The URL can be used to link to this page

03-01-2016 Searchable packet 1CITY OF CUPERTINO AGENDA Tuesday, March 1, 2016 10300 Torre Avenue and 10350 Torre Avenue CITY COUNCIL 4:00 PM Special Meeting Non-televised Closed Session (4:00) Immediately Followed by a Televised Study Session (Approximately 6:00); Followed by the Televised Regular Meeting (6:45) NOTICE AND CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING (CLOSED SESSION AND STUDY SESSION) AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Cupertino City Council is hereby called for Tuesday, March 1, 2016, commencing at 4:00 p.m. for a closed session in City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 and immediately followed at approximately 6:00 p.m. by a study session in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014. Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business on the subject matters listed below under the heading, “Special Meeting." The regular meeting items will be heard at 6:45 p.m. in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. SPECIAL MEETING CLOSED SESSION - 4:00 PM City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue 1.Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Properties: APN 375-21-001, Lawrence Expressway at Mitty Avenue and APN 381-19-015, Lawrence Expressway at Doyle Road. Agency Negotiators: Carol Atwood and Gail Seeds. Negotiating Parties: San Jose Water Company; County Roads and Airports; City of San Jose. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 2.Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) - Two cases STUDY SESSION - immediately following closed session (approximately 6:00 PM) Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue Page 1 CITY OF CUPERTINO 1 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA 3.Subject: Study session on options for increasing business license taxes Recommended Action: Conduct study session on options for increasing business license taxes and provide direction to staff on recommended approaches for consideration of either special or general taxes ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 PM Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS POSTPONEMENTS 1.Subject: Continue Item No. 20 Approval of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Fee Schedule to March 15 Recommended Action: Continue this item to March 15 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 2.Subject: Approve the January 26 (teleconferencing) City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the minutes A - Draft Minutes 3.Subject: Approve the February 2 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the minutes A - Draft Minutes 4.Subject: Set application deadline and interview date(s) for terms expiring on the Page 2 CITY OF CUPERTINO 2 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA Teen Commission Recommended Action: Staff recommends the following deadlines: 1.) Applications due in the City Clerk's office by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 6; and 2.) Interviews held beginning at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24 and Wednesday, May 25 (as needed) Staff Report A - Adopted Resolution No. 09-115 5.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 8, 2016 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-014 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending January 8, 2016 A - Draft Resolution B - AP Report 6.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 15, 2016 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-015 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending January 15, 2016 A - Draft Resolution B - AP Report 7.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 22, 2016 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-016 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending January 22, 2016 A - Draft Resolution B - AP Report 8.Subject: Support of the “Safety for All” Ballot Initiative, A Series of Gun Reform Measures Initiated by Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-017 supporting the “Safety for All” ballot initiative. Direct staff to send copies of the resolution to President Barack Obama, U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, Congresswoman Barbara Lee, Governor Jerry Brown, Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom, California Senator Loni Hancock, and California Assemblymember Tony Thurmond. Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Safety For All Act 9.Subject: Orchard Supply Hardware is making a $5,000 donation to the City of Cupertino for specific use at the McClellan Ranch Preserve Recommended Action: Staff is requesting the Council to accept the monetary donation to be used for supplies and equipment and/or facility enhancements at McClellan Ranch Preserve Staff Report Page 3 CITY OF CUPERTINO 3 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA 10.Subject: Friends of Stevens Creek Trail request for partnership and contribution towards a feasibility study of fish migration improvements along Stevens Creek Recommended Action: Authorize a contribution of $6,380 towards the local matching fund requirement of a Santa Clara County Water District grant proposal by the Friends of Stevens Creek Trail and regional partners. Staff Report A - Letter from Friends of Stevens Creek Trail B - Steelhead Passage Feasibility Study 11.Subject: Approaches to address continued noise complaints regarding cement plant operations Recommended Action: Direct the following actions to ensure ongoing sound compliance of the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company’s Plant, located outside of Cupertino’s boundary, and address ongoing residents’ related noise concerns: - Direct staff to send a letter to the County acknowledging that residents’ complaints regarding noise associated with Plant operations continue and that quarterly noise monitoring should commence as recommended in the DEH December 2015 Report of Findings. - Direct staff to provide City Council with updates on the quarterly noise monitoring studies conducted by the County, when available. - Appropriate $15,000 to conduct an independent City-led noise study. Staff Report A - Study B - Peer Review C - County Findings D - Letter 12.Subject: Planning Commission’s recommendation to select Alan Takahashi as the Environmental Review Committee representative Recommended Action: Accept the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Environmental Review Committee. Staff Report 13.Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for 7 Eleven Store #2367, 21530 Stevens Creek Boulevard Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for 7 Eleven Store #2367, 21530 Stevens Creek Boulevard Staff Report A - Application 14.Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Target T3224, 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO 4 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Target T3224, 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard Staff Report A - Application 15.Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Steins Beer Garden, 10088 North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Steins Beer Garden, 10088 North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 Staff Report A - Application 16.Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for The City Fish, 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard Recommended Action: Recomment approval to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for The City Fish, 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard Staff Report A - Application 17.Subject: Survey of residents to provide feedback on willingness to support a sales tax measure or an employer tax. Recommended Action: 1)Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a consultant contract and/or agreements with other cities with a cost to the City of Cupertino of up to $40,000 to survey residents on their willingness to support a sales tax measure or an employer tax to fund mass transit services along major commute corridors; and 2)Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget (Transportation-Traffic Engineering 100-88-844) by an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000. Staff Report 18.Subject: 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I, City Project No. 2015-22 & 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project, City Project No. 2014-15 contract amendment. Page 5 CITY OF CUPERTINO 5 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA Recommended Action: Staff recommends Council take the following actions for consulting services provided by Pavement Engineering, Inc. (PEI): 1.Authorize an increase in the contract amount from $305,380 to $400,380 for the 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I; and 2.Authorize an increase in the contract amount from $75,685 to $85,000 for the 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project; and 3.Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute amended service order agreements for the 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I and 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project for the not to exceed amounts of $400,380 and $85,000, respectively. Staff Report 19.Subject: Conceptual Study for Route 85 Corridor Mass Transit Alternatives Recommended Action: 1)Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a consultant contract and/or agreements with other cities with a cost to the City of Cupertino of up to $40,000 to complete a conceptual alternatives study for the State Route 85 Corridor, between State Route 87 and Highway 101; and 2)Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget (Transportation-Traffic Engineering 100-88-844) by an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000. Staff Report A - Resolution for Regional Mass Transit B - Light Rail or Dedicated Bus Lane Information Sheet SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES PUBLIC HEARINGS 20.Subject: Approval of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Fee Schedule which was originally noticed for tonights agenda will be continued to March 15. Recommended Action: Under Postponements this item will be continued to March 15 ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 21.Subject: Consideration and approval of the Mid-Year Financial Report and recommended budget adjustments for Fiscal Year 2015-16 Recommended Action: 1. Accept the City Manager’s Mid-Year Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2015-16 2. Approve the Mid-Year adjustments for Fiscal Year 2015-16 as described in the Mid-Year Financial Report 3. Adopt Resolution No. 16-018 approving Mid-Year budget adjustment Page 6 CITY OF CUPERTINO 6 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA Staff Report A. Mid-Year Financial Report B. Draft Resolution C. Accounting Staff by Size of GF Budget D. Accounting Staff Burden Ratios by GF Budget E. Accounting Staff Burden Ratio by Total Budget F. Performance Measures - Clean Version G. Performance Measures - Redline Version 22.Subject: Proposed Initiative submitted by Kenneth Silvery Tersini regarding the Oaks Shopping Center Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-019 directing City staff to prepare a report on the effects of the Oaks Initiative pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212 and appropriate $150,000.00 for such purpose Staff Report A - Proposed Initiative B - Draft Resolution ordering preparation of an Elections Code Section 9212 Report C - City Attorney Title and Summary 23.Subject: Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction Recommended Action: Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction; defer a decision on whether to place the measure on the November 8, 2016 ballot until after the 9212 Report on the Initiative is completed Staff Report A - Certification B - Letter from proponents REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF 24.Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments and general comments ADJOURNMENT Page 7 CITY OF CUPERTINO 7 March 1, 2016City Council AGENDA The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Prior to seeking judicial review of any adjudicatory (quasi-judicial) decision, interested persons must file a petition for reconsideration within ten calendar days of the date the City Clerk mails notice of the City’s decision. Reconsideration petitions must comply with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code §2.08.096. Contact the City Clerk’s office for more information or go to http://www.cupertino.org/index.aspx?page=125 for a reconsideration petition form. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next City Council meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the Council meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, City Council meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Council, and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to the podium and the Mayor will recognize you. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. Page 8 CITY OF CUPERTINO 8 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1350 Name: Status:Type:Closed Session Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/12/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Properties: APN 375-21-001, Lawrence Expressway at Mitty Avenue and APN 381-19-015, Lawrence Expressway at Doyle Road. Agency Negotiators: Carol Atwood and Gail Seeds. Negotiating Parties: San Jose Water Company; County Roads and Airports; City of San Jose. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Subject:ConferencewithRealPropertyNegotiatorspursuanttoGovernmentCodeSection 54956.8.Properties:APN375-21-001,LawrenceExpresswayatMittyAvenueandAPN381- 19-015,LawrenceExpresswayatDoyleRoad.AgencyNegotiators:CarolAtwoodandGail Seeds.NegotiatingParties:SanJoseWaterCompany;CountyRoadsandAirports;CityofSan Jose. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™9 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1491 Name: Status:Type:Closed Session Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/10/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) - Two cases Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Subject:ConferencewithLegalCounsel-AnticipatedLitigation:Significantexposureto litigationpursuanttoparagraph(2)ofsubdivision(d)ofGovernmentCodeSection54956.9(d) (2) - Two cases CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™10 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1458 Name: Status:Type:Study Session Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/1/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Study session on options for increasing business license taxes Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Study session on options for increasing business license taxes Conductstudysessiononoptionsforincreasingbusinesslicensetaxesandprovidedirectionto staff on recommended approaches for consideration of either special or general taxes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™11 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1514 Name: Status:Type:Postponements Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/18/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Continue Item No. 20 Approval of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Fee Schedule to March 15 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Continue Item No. 20 Approval of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Fee Schedule to March 15 Continue this item to March 15 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™12 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1475 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/4/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Approve the January 26 (teleconferencing) City Council minutes Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A - Draft Minutes Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Approve the January 26 (teleconferencing) City Council minutes Approve the minutes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™13 DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 26, 2016 (6:55 PM Teleconferencing) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING At 7:04 p.m. Mayor Barry Chang called the Special City Council meeting to order in Cupertino City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Barry Chang, Vice Mayor Savita Vaidhyanathan, and Council members Darcy Paul, Rod Sinks and Gilbert Wong. Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 1. Subject: Resolution modifying the policy for teleconferencing during Council meetings to include open sessions in addition to closed sessions Recommended Action: Consider adopting Resolution No. 16-010 modifying the policy for teleconferencing during Council meetings to include open sessions in addition to closed sessions Council discussed concerns about facility capabilities and technical challenges. City Attorney Randolph Hom spoke on the legalities of the Brown Act and said that the policy would not be in violation of the Act as long as a quorum of Council was present in the Cupertino meeting location. Wong moved and Paul seconded to approve the policy on a one-time basis for February 2 and to bring the item back to Council on March 1 for public input. Paul made a friendly amendment to approve the policy for the entire month of February. Wong agreed to the friendly amendment. Ayes: Paul, Vaidhyanathan and Wong. Noes: Chang and Sinks. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 14 CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 2 City Council Minutes January 26, 2016 Vice Mayor Vaidhyanathan said she was unclear of the motion and Council continued its discussion. Councilmember Wong withdrew his motion. Sinks moved and Chang seconded to approve the policy as a general policy and to bring the item back to Council on March 1 for further discussion. Ayes: Chang and Sinks. Noes: Paul and Wong. Abstain: Vaidhyanathan. Absent: None. The motion failed and no action was taken. Council concurred to bring the item back to Council on March 1 for further evaluation. ADJOURNMENT At 7:25 p.m., Mayor Chang adjourned the meeting to the special commission interviews meeting of Tuesday, January 26, 10300 Torre Avenue, Community Hall Council Chamber, Cupertino, CA. _______________________________ Kirsten Squarcia, Deputy City Clerk Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the City Council meeting are available for review at the City Clerk’s Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click on the appropriate Packet. 15 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:115-1241 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:11/19/2015 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Approve the February 2 City Council minutes Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A - Draft Minutes Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Approve the February 2 City Council minutes Approve the minutes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™16 DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 2, 2016 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL At 5:30 p.m. Mayor Barry Chang called the Special City Council meeting to order in Cupertino City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue. Present: Mayor Barry Chang, Vice Mayor Savita Vaidhyanathan, and Council members Darcy Paul, Rod Sinks and Gilbert Wong. Absent: None. Council went into closed session and reconvened in open session at 6:45 p.m. in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue. CLOSED SESSION Council also met in a special closed session meeting at 5:15 p.m. regarding: Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9. Name of Case: City of Cupertino v. Siemens, et al. Mayor Chang announced that Council gave direction to counsel. 1. Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel-Existing Litigation pursuant to Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9. Name of case: City of Saratoga; City of Cupertino; Town of Los Gatos v. California Department of Transportation, et al. Mayor Chang announced that Council gave direction to counsel. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 17 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 2 At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Barry Chang called the Regular City Council meeting to order in Cupertino Community Hall Council Chambers, 10350 Torre Avenue and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Barry Chang, Vice Mayor Savita Vaidhyanathan, and Council members Darcy Paul, Rod Sinks and Gilbert Wong. Absent: None. CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATION 1. Subject: Present Young Artist Awards to Saailey Palekar (Age 6-10), Kathy Liang (Age 11-14) and Maya Kapur (Age 15-18) Recommended Action: Present Young Artist Awards to Saailey Palekar (Age 6-10), Kathy Liang (Age 11-14) and Maya Kapur (Age 15-18) Written communications for this item included a PowerPoint presentation. Mayor Chang presented the Young Artist Awards to Saailey Palekar (Age 6-10), Kathy Liang (Age 11-14) and Maya Kapur (Age 15-18). 2. Subject: Presentation of "TacoCat" transportation video by students Derrick Lee and Jonathan Fung and first place monetary award Recommended Action: View video presentation and present first place monetary Award Council viewed the video presentation and presented the first place monetary award to Derrick Lee and Jonathan Fung. POSTPONEMENTS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Phyllis Dickstein talked about the Cupertino Citizens Growth Initiative petition and deferring any development until that process is complete. Bob McKibbin on behalf of Concerned Citizens of Cupertino talked about the Initiative petition, putting a moratorium on all General Plan Amendments (GPA) until June and adopting the ordinance instead of sending it to a ballot vote. 18 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 3 Brooke Ezzat talked about the Initiative petition and gathering signatures. Steven Scharf talked about the Initiative petition and the number of signatures gathered. Cathy Helgerson talked about accountability of City officials and listening to residents. Jon Willey talked about the Initiative petition and school crowding with new housing developments. He distributed written comments. Liana Crabtree talked about where petition signatures could be gathered. Joan Chin talked about the Initiative petition and setting up a commission regarding development proposals. Peggy Griffin talked about putting the Initiative petition on the June ballot. Danessa Techmanski talked about traffic and other environmental issues with the Vallco development proposal. Qin Pan talked about crowding in Cupertino schools. Richard Bernhardt talked about crowding in schools, traffic and withholding any development decisions until the Initiative can be resolved. Cathy Wang talked about the Initiative petition. Ignatius Y Ding talked about traffic issues in the bay area and Council judiciary duty. Dennis Whittaker talked about the Initiative petition and putting off any GPA decisions until that process is complete. Liang-Fang Chao on behalf of Cupertino Citizens for Sensible Growth talked about the Initiative petition. Yanping Zhao talked about overdevelopment of Cupertino. Lisa Warren talked about the Initiative petition and Council member campaign promises. 19 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 4 Dang Ming Yao talked about the Initiative petition. Larry Hendler talked about the Initiative petition and holding off on development until the Initiative process is finished. CONSENT CALENDAR Wong moved and Sinks seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as presented with the exception of item numbers 9 and 12 which were pulled for discussion. Ayes: Chang, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Sinks and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 3. Subject: Approve the January 12 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the minutes 4. Subject: Approve the January 19 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the minutes 5. Subject: Approve the January 25 (commission interviews) City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the minutes 6. Subject: Approve the January 26 (commission interviews) City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the minutes 7. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending December 18, 2015 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-011 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending December 18, 2015 8. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending December 30, 2015 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 16-012 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending December 30, 2015 9. Subject: Letter Agreement between The Irvine Company, LLC, a California limited liability company and the City of Cupertino, a municipal corporation agreeing to an advance contribution of $200,000 to be used for the I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvement Project and to be credited against Irvine Company’s $7,000,000 future contribution that is currently contemplated as a Development Agreement item for their proposed development for the Hamptons Apartment Project at 19500 Pruneridge Avenue 20 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 5 Recommended Action: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Irvine Company, LLC to accept an advance contribution of $200,000 to be used for the I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Project 2) Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget by an additional expense amount of $1,200,000 for I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Project budget 3) Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget by an additional revenue amount of $1,200,000 for I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Project budget Jennifer Griffin asked questions regarding this item. Staff answered questions from Council. Sinks moved and Chang seconded to 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Irvine Company, LLC to accept an advance contribution of $200,000 to be used for the I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Project 2) Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget by an additional expense amount of $1,200,000 for I- 280/Wolfe Road Interchange Project budget 3) Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget by an additional revenue amount of $1,200,000 for I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Project budget. The motion carried unanimously. 10. Subject: Bubb, Elm & McClellan Storm Drain/Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project - Increase Contingency Authorization Recommended Action: Authorize an increase in the construction contingency amount by an additional $32,000 with funds from the current appropriated project budget 11. Subject: Discontinue headline translations Recommended Action: Discontinue headline translations and redirect the funds to other budget priorities 12. Subject: Transportation Tax Measure Allocations Recommended Action: Approve advocacy direction to City representatives regarding the proposed Santa Clara County sales tax, including general funding levels within expenditure categories, as developed in coordination with other North County and West Valley cities Written communications for this item included a letter from County Supervisor S. Joseph Simitian and emails to Council. The following individuals spoke on this item: 21 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 6 Jennifer Griffin Chris O’Connor on behalf of Silicon Valley Leadership Group Jason Lungaard on behalf of Apple Steven Scharf Kent Vincent Cathy Helgerson Richard Bernhardt Cheriel Jensen Greg Schaffer Staff answered questions from Council. Sinks moved and Wong seconded to approve advocacy direction to City representatives regarding the proposed Santa Clara County sales tax, including general funding levels within expenditure categories, as developed in coordination with other North County and West Valley cities. Council also gave direction to Council member Sinks to go back to the West Valley and North County mayors to clarify the $500 million for congestion relief/transit/mode shift; with $250 million allocated towards the Route 85 Corridor and $250 million allocated toward the North County. Council also directed staff to come back at the next Council meeting with a request for authority to spend $20,000-$30,000 on a transportation poll. The motion carried unanimously. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 13. Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance amending the Cupertino Municipal Code to prohibit marijuana cultivation, dispensaries, and deliveries and commercial cannabis activities within the City of Cupertino. (Application No. MCA-2015-01; Location: City- wide; Applicant: City of Cupertino) Recommended Action: Conduct the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 16-2140: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 19.08.030 and adding Chapter 19.98 of Title 19 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, Marijuana Cultivation Facilities, Commercial Cannabis Activities, and Medical Marijuana Deliveries” Written communications for this item included a desk item showing minor edits to the ordinance. Cathy Helgerson spoke on this item urging Council to adopt the ordinance. 22 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 7 City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of the ordinance and the minor edits to the ordinance. Wong moved and Sinks seconded to read Ordinance No. 16-2140 by title only and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the second reading thereof with an amendment to include the minor edits as noted. Ayes: Chang, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Sinks and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Wong moved and sinks seconded to enact Ordinance No. 16-2140. Ayes: Chang, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Sinks and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 14. Subject: An ordinance amending Sections 14.04.100 and 18.56.040 of the Cupertino municipal code to provide for a limited waiver of reimbursement requirements when a property owner dedicates right-of-way for a city street improvement or facility project. Recommended Action: Conduct the second reading and enact Ordinance No. 16-2141: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending Sections 14.04.100 and 18.56.040 of the Cupertino Municipal Code to provide for a limited waiver of reimbursement requirements when a property owner dedicates right-of-way for a city street improvement or facility project,” with an amendment directed by the City Council during the first reading of the ordinance amendment on January 19, 2016 to include a provision in the ordinance language such that the city council determines the percent of a waiver to offer for right of way acquisition for individual projects as they are approved during the CIP budget process, to facilitate the provision of sidewalks and street widening in certain areas where pedestrians and bicyclists are prevalent Written communications for this item included an email to Council. City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of the ordinance. Wong moved and Paul seconded to read Ordinance No. 16-2141 by title only and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the second reading thereof with an amendment to remove the highlighted portion on pages 3-4 regarding City Council approval of the percentage of waiver to offer at the time a capital project is approved. Ayes: Chang, Vaidhyanathan, Paul and Wong. Noes: Sinks. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 23 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 8 Wong moved and Paul seconded to enact Ordinance No. 16-2141. Ayes: Chang, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Sinks and Wong. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Council recessed from 9:31 p.m. to 9:41 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 15. Subject: Review and consider two development proposals (the Goodyear Tire and Oaks sites) submitted for consideration by the City Council to authorize the applicants to submit an application for General Plan Amendments and staff to commence environmental and project review. (Application No.(s): GPAAuth-2015-01 & GPAAuth- 2015-02; Applicant: KT Urban, Mark Tersini and De Anza Ventures (Oaks shopping center); Location: 21255-21755 Stevens Creek Boulevard, 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard (Goodyear Tire); APN: 326-27-039, -040 and -041; 326-10-058) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 16-013 after determining which applications are authorized to move forward to apply for General Plan Amendments Written communications for this item included emails to Council and a staff PowerPoint presentation. Principal Planner Piu Ghosh reviewed the staff report via a PowerPoint presentation. Property owner John Vidovich talked about the Goodyear Tire site proposal. He answered questions from Council. Mark Tersini, Principal at KT Urban and owner of the Oaks Shopping Center, Beverly Bryant, community outreach, and Doug Yount, Principal at Applied Development Economics talked about the Oaks Shopping Center proposal via a PowerPoint presentation. The following individuals spoke on the item: Cathy Helgerson – opposed (distributed written comments) Greg Schaffer– in favor Kevin McClellan on behalf of Cupertino Chamber of Commerce – in favor of both projects 24 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 9 Art Cohen on behalf of Cupertino Chamber of Commerce and as an individual – in favor Richard Bernhardt – opposed Heather Dean – opposed Rhoda Fry – opposed Larry Hendler – opposed Scott Hughes – opposed Khyati – Mayor Chang read from speaker card – in favor of hotel at Goodyear site but opposed to Vallco and Oaks Kelly Lambert – in favor Xiaowen Wang – opposed Jon Willey – opposed (distributed written comments) Park Chamberlain – opposed Mark Santoro – in favor Penny Whittaker – opposed Dennis Whittaker – opposed Jennifer Griffin – opposed Don Krenn – in favor of Oaks Craig Hofstetter – in favor of Oaks Steve Elich – in favor of Oaks Lisa Warren – opposed Peggy Griffin – opposed Steven Scharf on behalf of Better Cupertino - opposed Liang-Fang Chao – opposed Luke Lang – opposed Joseph Ventimiglia – opposed Lee Chiang – in favor Staff answered questions from Council. Sinks moved and Vaidhyanathan seconded to adopt Resolution No. 16-013 denying authorization of prospective development proposals to proceed as General Plan Amendment applications. The motion carried with Chang voting no. REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF 16. Subject: Construction Project Updates Recommended Action: Receive updates 25 City Council Minutes February 2, 2016 10 This item was not heard. 17. Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments and general comments This item was not heard. ADJOURNMENT At 12:49 a.m. on Wednesday, February 3, Mayor Chang adjourned the meeting. _______________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the City Council meeting are available for review at the City Clerk’s Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, then click on the appropriate Packet. Most Council meetings are shown live on Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U-verse Channel 99 and are available at your convenience at www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes, and then click Archived Webcast. Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. 26 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1409 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/22/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Set application deadline and interview date(s) for terms expiring on the Teen Commission Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Adopted Resolution No. 09-115 Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:Setapplicationdeadlineandinterviewdate(s)fortermsexpiringontheTeen Commission Staff recommends the following deadlines: 1.) Applications due in the City Clerk's office by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 6; and 2.)Interviewsheldbeginningat3:30p.m.onTuesday,May24andWednesday,May25(as needed) CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™27 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3223 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Set application deadline and interview date(s) for terms expiring on the Teen Commission. Recommended Action Staff recommends the following deadlines: 1.) Applications due in the City Clerk's office by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 6; and 2.) Interviews held beginning at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24 and Wednesday, May 25 (as needed) Discussion The Teen Commission, comprised of nine members, has three vacancies this year. The Recreation and Community Services Department will print and distribute flyers, as well as include the information in the summer Recreation Schedule and the Cupertino Scene. The City Clerk’s Office will advertise the vacancies in the Courier and the World Journal. Interviews should be scheduled in May in order to interview applicants before they leave the area for summer activities. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Kirsten Squarcia, Deputy City Clerk Reviewed by: Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A - Adopted Resolution No. 09-115 28 RESOLUTION NO. 09-115 RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 09-078 TO DELETE SECTION A REGARDING RANKING SO THAT ALL APPLICANTS WOULD BE INTERVIEWED WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 02-065 establishing a Teen Commission and adopted Resolution Nos. 02-167, 04-405, 05-095, and 09-078 making various adjustments; WHEREAS, the Council wishes to amend the composition to delete section A regarding ranking to result in all applicants being interviewed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: • The Cupertino Teen Commission will be comprised of nine (9) members, at least one person from each public middle school and public high school in Cupertino, if possible. Membership on the Commission will be limited to Cupertino residents. Members may attend schools outside of the city limits, or be schooled at home. Commissioners must be in 8th through 12th grade. • The members of the Teen Commission shall be appointed pursuant to the current recruitment process adopted by City Council, with the following exceptions: Applicants under the age of 18 must have written permission of a parent or guardian to participate in the Teen Commission. The Parks and Recreation Department will work with the City Clerk to notice vacancies so that outreach to schools and youth organizations is accomplished. A letter of recommendation shall be submitted as part of the application process. The Council shall appoint new commissioners in June, to be seated in September, except in the case of reappointment of vacant seats. A) For all applications in the interview pool, the City Clerk will summarize the applications on a chart that indicates applicants' names, schools, and grades in order to assist the Council decision process. The summary chart will be distributed to the Councilmembers before interviewing begins. B) Each applicant in the interview pool will then be interviewed by Council. The applicant will start with a two-minute speech answering the questions: Why do you wish to serve? and Why do you feel you are qualified to serve? C) Each Councilmember will then have the opportunity to ask at least 1 question of the applicant. D) When the entire pool has been interviewed, Council will discuss the applicants. After the discussion, ballot voting will take place to determine the appointments. 29 Resolution No. 09-115 2 E) If no applicant is appointed from one of the 5 public schools in Cupertino, Council may choose to re-advertise for a subsequent appointment process, fill the vacancy with any other applicant, or leave the seat vacant. • Commissioners should reflect the broadest possible representation of Cupertino youth. • The term of office of each commissioner shall be two years, beginning in September with the new school year. • Commissioners shall not serve consecutive terms unless there is a vacancy for which there is no eligible applicant, at which time the City Council may waive this restriction. • None of the Teen Commissioners shall be otherwise officials or employees of the City of Cupertino nor be related by blood or marriage to any official or employee of the city. • The Commission shall elect a chair and vice-chair at the beginning of each year. • Meeting times and location will be decided by the commission at the first meeting of the year, and will be adopted as the annual meeting schedule pursuant to the Brown Act. • Actions taken by the Commission will be by majority vote. • The Department of Parks and Recreation will provide staff support to the Teen Commission and will post meeting agendas. • Commencing in 2009, five (5) Teen Commissioners shall be appointed for a two-year term bringing the number to eleven (11). In 2010, four (4) Teen Commissioners shall be appointed for a two-year term bringing the number to nine (9). Teen Commissioners will then be appointed to a two-year term setting staggered terms of five (5) appointments in odd- numbered years and four (4) appointments in even-numbered years. Vacant seats will be filled with applicants willing to finish the term. • The powers and function of the Teen Commission will be to advise the City Council and staff on issues and projects important to youth. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of July, 2009 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: Mahoney, Sandoval, Santoro, Wang, Wong NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 30 Resolution No. 09-115 3 ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Kimberly Smith /s/ Orrin Mahoney City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 31 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1445 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/28/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 8, 2016 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A - Draft Resolution B - AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 8, 2016 AdoptResolutionNo.16-014acceptingAccountsPayablefortheperiodendingJanuary8, 2016 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™32 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING January 8, 2016 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Lisa Taitano, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 16th day of February, 2016, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Barry Chang, Mayor, City of Cupertino 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1446 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/28/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 15, 2016 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A - Draft Resolution B - AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 15, 2016 AdoptResolutionNo.16-015acceptingAccountsPayablefortheperiodendingJanuary15, 2016 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™48 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING January 15, 2016 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Lisa Taitano, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 16th day of February, 2016, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Barry Chang, Mayor, City of Cupertino 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1447 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/28/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 22, 2016 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A - Draft Resolution B - AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending January 22, 2016 AdoptResolutionNo.16-016acceptingAccountsPayablefortheperiodendingJanuary22, 2016 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™70 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING January 22, 2016 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Lisa Taitano, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 16th day of February, 2016, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Barry Chang, Mayor, City of Cupertino 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1456 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/1/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Support of the “Safety for All” Ballot Initiative, A Series of Gun Reform Measures Initiated by Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Safety For All Act Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:Supportofthe“SafetyforAll”BallotInitiative,ASeriesofGunReformMeasures Initiated by Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom AdoptResolutionNo.16-017supportingthe“SafetyforAll”ballotinitiative.Directstaffto sendcopiesoftheresolutiontoPresidentBarackObama,U.S.SenatorsBarbaraBoxerand DianneFeinstein,CongresswomanBarbaraLee,GovernorJerryBrown,LieutenantGovernor GavinNewsom,CaliforniaSenatorLoniHancock,andCaliforniaAssemblymemberTony Thurmond. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™84 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3212 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Support of the “Safety for All” Ballot Initiative, A Series of Gun Reform Measures Initiated by Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Recommended Action Adopt a Resolution supporting the “Safety for All” ballot initiative. Direct staff to send copies of the resolution to President Barack Obama, U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, Congresswoman Barbara Lee, Governor Jerry Brown, Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom, California Senator Loni Hancock, and California Assemblymember Tony Thurmond. Description California Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom announced a 2016 ballot initiative that would enact stricter gun laws in California. If approved, the package of commonsense gun reforms known as the “Safety for All” Initiative would require instant background checks for purchases of ammunition, strengthen background checks for gun purchases, prohibit possession of large detachable military-style magazines, and require individuals convicted of serious and violent crimes to immediately surrender of firearms in their possession. Lieutenant Governor Newsom has partnered with the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence to draft the initiative with the following provisions: 1. Prohibit Possession of Large-Capacity Military-Style Magazines: The Safety for All Initiative will outlaw possession of large-capacity magazines of 11 rounds or more and provides for their legal disposal. If passed, California would join New York, New Jersey, Hawaii and the District of Columbia in banning possession of these military-style clips. 85 2 2. Treats Ammunition Sales Like Gun Sales: The Initiative requires licensing of ammunition vendors and point-of-sale background checks for ammunition purchases. Under the initiative, if a person is convicted of a felony, a violent misdemeanor, has a restraining order or has been declared dangerously mentally ill, they will no longer be able to buy ammunition in California. California would be the first state to require background check at point of sale. 3. Ensures People Prohibited from Owning Guns Do Not Possess Them: The Initiative prescribes a clear firearms relinquishment process for those convicted of a felony or a violent misdemeanor. 4. Requires Reporting Lost or Stolen Guns: The Initiative requires firearm owners to notify law enforcement if their firearm has been lost or stolen. If the Safety for All initiative is approved, California would join 11 other states and the City of Sacramento in requiring lost and/or stolen firearm reporting. 5. Shares with Federal System on Prohibited People: The Initiative mandates that California share data with the FBI/NICS (National Instant Criminal Background Check System). More than 32,000 deaths occur each year in the United States due to gun violence. There have been 150 school shootings since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary took place in December 2012. Estimates show that between 1982 and 2014 as many as 78 mass shooting occurred in the United States, and in the vast majority of these instances, the guns used were obtained legally. The Safety for All Initiative is intended to make it more difficult for dangerous people to get guns and ammunition legally in California. California has been a leader in the nation in advocating sensible gun laws that are intended to save lives and improve public safety. By aligning with the state on this critical initiative, Cupertino can be recognized as a leader in regulatory reforms and collaborative approaches to address gun violence. The City can expand this leadership by supporting restricted access to firearms and ammunition and advocating for strengthening existing federal and state gun control laws in the future in partnership with other communities across the region and the nation. Council review of this initiative was supported by Cupertino City Council’s Legislative Review Committee. The proposed “Safety For All” Ballot Initiative has been endorsed by the following: 86 3 Elected Officials:  US Senator Dianne Feinstein  Speaker of The Assembly Toni Atkins  San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo  San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee  Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf  West Hollywood Mayor Lindsey Horvath Cities:  The City of Oakland  The City Of West Hollywood  The City of Berkeley Sustainability Impact Protecting and promoting the health, wellbeing and vitality of all members of the community is an imperative of the City, institutionalized in its varied plans, including its most recent Climate Action Plan. Supporting this initiative will work to further safeguard the community and enable all members to achieve their economic, environmental and social potential, creating public good and sustainability gains. Fiscal Impact Staff does not anticipate any costs involved in the adoption of the attached resolution, nor the distribution of letters. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Erin Cooke, Assistant to the City Manager & Sustainability Manager Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A. Draft Resolution B. The Safety for All Act of 2016 87 RESOLUTION NO. ---- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CUPERTINO SUPPORTING THE "SAFETY FOR ALL ACT OF 2016" BALLOT INITIATIVE WHEREAS, more than 1 17,000 Americans were killed or injured by guns in 2013, including nearly 7,500 minors, and 8,935 Californians; and, WHEREAS, there have been at least 160 school shootings in America since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in December 2012; and, WHEREAS, California has been a leader in adopting effective, common sense gun safety laws to save lives and increase public safety, but the state still has loopholes in its laws that allow too many dangerous individuals to obtain firearms and commit acts of violence; and WHEREAS, California Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom introduced a 2016 ballot measure known as the "Safety for All Act of 2016," which is a package of common sense reforms to protect our families and communities from gun violence; and, WHEREAS, this initiative would help keep ammunition from falling into dangerous hands by requiring ammunition sellers to be licensed, to conduct background checks on purchasers and employees, and to report records of ammunition sales and lost or stolen ammunition to law enforcement; and WHEREAS, this initiative would strengthen oversight of firearm dealers by requiring them to conduct employee background checks and report lost or stolen ammunition, as well as firearms; and, WHEREAS, this initiative would help protect our city from mass shootings by making it illegal to possess the kinds of military-style, large-capacity ammunition magazines that enable mass killings, and by providing for the legal disposal of these magazines; and, 88 WHEREAS, this initiative would help enforce existing gun laws by implementing a clear process for those convicted of a felony or other firearm- prohibiting crime to relinquish their firearms after conviction; and, WHEREAS, this initiative would help law enforcement break up gun trafficking rings and return lost or stolen firearms to their lawful owners by requiring individuals to notify law enforcement if their firearm has been lost or stolen; and, WHEREAS, the initiative would ensure that California law enforcement shares crucial data with the FBI's Background Check System; and, WHEREAS, recent public polls show the vast majority of Californians support all of these proposals to close loopholes and strengthen our state's gun safety laws; and, WHEREAS, it is essential for the public safety of the people of Cupertino to support effective and reasonable reforms to protect our community from gun violence; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby supports the "Safety for All Act" ballot initiative. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February, 2016, by the following vote: Vote: Members of the City Council Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: APPROVED: ______________________ __________________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Barry Chang, Mayor, City of Cupertino 89 THE SAFETY FOR ALL ACT OF 2016 Lost or Stolen Firearms (section 4) Beginning July I , 20 I 7, owners of firearms have to report the theft or loss of a firearm within 5 days. First and second offenses for failure to report are infractions with fines up to $1000, subsequent offenses are misdemeanors with up to 6 months in jail and/or up to $1000 fine. Additional fines and/or penalties available for false reports. Law enforcement must comply with respect to their personal guns. Strengthening Federal Background Checks (section 5) Beginning July 1, 2017, require all future AGs to do what current State DOJ does voluntarily: report information to NICS (federal background check system) about which California residents are prohibited from owning guns, and continue conducting its own background checks on gun buyers. Contains privacy safeguards for reported information. Large-Capacity Magazines (section 6) Require owners to get rid of large-capacity magazines by July 1, 2017 by removing them from the state, selling them to a dealer, or giving them to law enforcement for destruction. Violators can be given an infraction with a $100 fine per magazine, or a misdemeanor with up to one year in jail or $100 fine per magazine. Firearms Dealers (section 7) Require firearms dealers to report lost or stolen ammunition, and, by January 1, 2018, conduct background checks on employees. Sales of Ammunition (sections 8 and 9) Beginning January 1, 2018, require dealers who sell more than 500 rounds of ammunition per month to become licensed ammunition venders. Dealers who are already licensed firearms dealers would automatically be deemed licensed ammunition dealers. Require venders to report the loss or theft of ammunition to law enforcement, and conduct background checks on employees. Beginning July 1, 2019, require all sales of ammunition to be made through licensed vendors. Sales of ammunition by unlicensed individuals would have to be processed through a licensed ammunition vendor, and sales over the Internet would have to be delivered to a licensed ammunition vendor. Require ammunition purchasers to apply to DOJ for an ammunition purchase authorization number that would be valid for 4 years at a cost of $50 and a possible 30 day wait. Purchasers would have to use that number for an "instant" background check at each ammunition purchase, but sales would be immediate (no waiting period). 90 Transfers of ammunition - where no money is exchanged - would not have to be processed through vendors but would have to be conducted in a face-to-face transaction. Impose misdemeanor for straw purchases. Relinquishment of Firearms by Convicted Criminals (section 10) Beginning January 1, 2018, require courts to inform defendants, at the time of conviction, that their conviction deprives them of the right to own a firearm for 10 years or permanently. Requires them to dispose of firearms, generally within 14 days or less, and provide court with documentation about disposal. Court would issue search warrant if known firearms were not proven to be relinquished as required. Theft of Firearms (section 11) Clarifies that the theft of a gun can be charged as a felony. Makes it illegal for people who have been convicted of the theft of a firearm to possess firearms. 91 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1476 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/5/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Orchard Supply Hardware is making a $5,000 donation to the City of Cupertino for specific use at the McClellan Ranch Preserve Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:OrchardSupplyHardwareismakinga$5,000donationtotheCityofCupertinofor specific use at the McClellan Ranch Preserve StaffisrequestingtheCounciltoacceptthemonetarydonationtobeusedforsuppliesand equipment and/or facility enhancements at McClellan Ranch Preserve CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™92 RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT QUINLAN COMMUNITY CENTER 10 10185 N. STELLING ROAD • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5733 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3120 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject: Orchard Supply Hardware is making a $5000 donation to the City of Cupertino for specific use at the McClellan Ranch Preserve. Recommended Action Staff is requesting the Council to accept the monetary donation to be used for supplies and equipment and/or facility enhancements at McClellan Ranch Preserve. Description Orchard Supply contacted the City of Cupertino on February 2, 2016 with news that they would like to donate $5000 to McClellan Ranch Preserve. This donation is being made on behalf of the grand opening of the new Cupertino Orchard Supply Hardware Store at Hollenbeck/Homestead. Each Orchard Supply store partners with a local non- profit in the community as part of its Neighbors Helping Neighbors Program. Discussion The donation will be used to replace outdoor equipment used by the Community Garden program participants as well as the other park users (Rolling Hills 4-H, Acterra, Santa Clara Valley Audubon). City staff also benefits from the new equipment which can be used with program participants enrolled in the after school classes, camps, and school creek tour programs. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact to the city upon receiving the donation. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Christine Hanel, Recreation Manager Reviewed by: Carol Atwood, Director of Recreation and Community Services Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: None 93 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1481 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/9/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Friends of Stevens Creek Trail request for partnership and contribution towards a feasibility study of fish migration improvements along Stevens Creek Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Letter from Friends of Stevens Creek Trail B - Steelhead Passage Feasibility Study Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:FriendsofStevensCreekTrailrequestforpartnershipandcontributiontowardsa feasibility study of fish migration improvements along Stevens Creek Authorize a contribution of $6,380 towards the local matching fund requirement of a Santa Clara County Water District grant proposal by the Friends of Stevens Creek Trail and regional partners. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™94 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3212 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject: Friends of Stevens Creek Trail request for partnership and contribution towards a feasibility study of fish migration improvements along Stevens Creek. Recommended Action: Authorize a contribution of $6,380 towards the local matching fund requirement of a Santa Clara County Water District grant proposal by the Friends of Stevens Creek Trail and regional partners. Description: On June February 8, 2016 the Santa Clara County Creeks Coalition submitted a written request to Mayor Chang and the Council to become a partner in a Santa Clara County Valley Water District (Water District) grant proposal to improve Steelhead Trout sustainability along Stevens Creek and contribute a portion of the local share requirement. Discussion Council provided direction to staff on July 7, 2015 to support regional efforts by local conservation groups to improve fish passage along Stevens Creek. In response, staff prepared letters to the Water District and potential partners to express Cupertino’s support of regional efforts. As a result of lobbying efforts by local conservation groups and regional partners like Cupertino, the Water District funded the Stevens Creek Fish Passage Assessment Project proposed by the Friends of Stevens Creek Trail in summer 2015. More recently, the Water District Board voted to include planning studies in their March grant cycle, which opens the door for additional improvement project proposals along Stevens Creek. The Friends of Stevens Creek Trail plans to submit a proposal for the Water District’s March grant cycle with regional partner support. The proposal consists of a feasibility study to evaluate alternatives and identify preferred solutions to improve fish passage at five locations along Stevens Creek, including three sites in Cupertino. Water District grants require a 25% local matching fund contribution. The Creeks Coalition estimates the project planning phase will cost $76,237 and require a $19,140 local match. The Friends of Stevens Creek Trail, therefore, requested financial contributions from the City of Cupertino, City of Mountain View, City of Sunnyvale and the Mid-Peninsula Open Space District should their proposal be selected. While this grant only covers the planning portion of 95 needed improvements, the Friends of Stevens Creek Trail expect the construction phase will be fully funded under the Water District’s Fisheries and Aquatic Habitat Collaborative Effort (FAHCE) Settlement Agreement and will not require additional local matching funds. Staff recommends signing on as a grant partner and providing a contribution of one-third ($6,380) of the local match requirement should the grant proposal be approved by the Water District. Supporting regional efforts to improve migration of Steelhead fish along Stevens Creek is in line with the City’s sustainability goals. Moreover, this particular project targets three sites within Cupertino’s boundaries. The City of Sunnyvale recently authorized a contribution of $4,785 (with up to $9,800 if needed) and partnership requests are scheduled for considered by the Mountain View City Council and Open Space District Board. Sustainability Impact: As guided by the City’s 2014 Adopted General Plan Environmental Resources/Sustainability Element, improving Steelhead fish migration along Stevens Creek aligns with the City’s goal to maintain biodiversity and ecological integrity of our local natural systems (Policy ES-7.8.1: Natural Water Courses to ensure wildlife habitat protection within our agency’s boundaries). Fiscal Impact: Discretionary funds in the FY 2015-16 Sustainability Division are available to cover this expenditure. No additional funds are needed. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Jaqui Guzmán, Assistant to the City Manager Reviewed by: David Brandt, City Manager Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: Exhibit A – Letter from Friends of Stevens Creek Trail Exhibit B – Steelhead Passage Improvement Project 96 Board of Directors Officers Tim Oey President Garth Williams Vice President Anne Ng Secretary Alan Ross Treasurer Directors Kathy Bettman Tom Bornheimer John Brazil Steve Garrity Ross Heitkamp Greg Unangst Associate Directors Husam Chekfa Philip Hocker Executive Director Aaron Grossman Programs & Media Manager Michelle Hocker Advisory Board Art Takahara Kevin Duggan Roy Verley 8 February 2016 City of Cupertino Mayor Barry Chang and Council Members Stevens Creek Fish Passage Improvement Project Next Steps Dear Mayor Chang and Members of the Council, We appreciated the attendance of Ms. Guzman of your staff at our February 8, 2016 meeting where we presented our proposal for conducting a feasibility study of alternatives to improve steelhead trout fish passage on Stevens Creek. We have assembled an excellent consultant project team to conduct the study and are planning to move ahead with a grant application to fund the project. Also attending were representatives of Mountain View, Sunnyvale, the Open Space District, and CALTRANS, all of whom expressed support for the project concept and interest in exploring possible options for support of the project. The Friends of Stevens Creek Trail will be applying for a grant prior to March 8, 2016 from the Santa Clara Valley Water District for evaluating alternatives and recommending a preferred alternative to improve fish passage at 5 locations along Stevens Creek. The Water District has been recently involved in projects in Stevens Creek, including the just completed Evelyn Avenue Fish Passage Improvement Project and the funding of the Stevens Creek Fish Passage Assessment Project, scheduled for completion in April 2016, the latter being the project previously proposed by the Friends of Stevens Creek Trail last summer. As the Water District Board voted on December 8, 2015 to include planning studies as eligible projects for the March 8 grant cycle, it has officially opened the door to the type of project that we proposing. Creating conditions conducive to steelhead trout sustainability in Stevens Creek would be an excellent way to further enhance the habitat of the creek in Cupertino and we therefore request your consideration of ways to support this project. We request that Cupertino become a partner in the project and provide a portion of the $19,140 needed as the 25% local share of the $76,237 total cost. The project involves only the planning phase of the work; we will not request City funding for the construction portions of the project as we expect the construction will be funded under the District’s FAHCE Settlement Agreement. We are also asking Cupertino for a letter to the Open Space District encouraging their participation in the project. We need a decision on this by March 8. Thank you for considering our request! Best regards, Aaron Grossman, Executive Director Friends of Stevens Creek Trail Friends of Stevens Creek Trail 22221 McClellan Road, Cupertino, California 95014 exec-dir@stevenscreektrail.org www.stevenscreektrail.org 408-255-5780 Exhibit A 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1399 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/21/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Approaches to address continued noise complaints regarding cement plant operations Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Study B - Peer Review C - County Findings D - Letter Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Approaches to address continued noise complaints regarding cement plant operations Direct the following actions to ensure ongoing sound compliance of the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company’s Plant, located outside of Cupertino’s boundary, and address ongoing residents’ related noise concerns: - Direct staff to send a letter to the County acknowledging that residents’ complaints regarding noise associated with Plant operations continue and that quarterly noise monitoring should commence as recommended in the DEH December 2015 Report of Findings. - Direct staff to provide City Council with updates on the quarterly noise monitoring studies conducted by the County, when available. - Appropriate $15,000 to conduct an independent City-led noise study. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™126 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3212 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Approaches to address continued noise complaints regarding cement plant operations Recommended Action Direct the following actions to ensure ongoing sound compliance of the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company’s Plant, located outside of Cupertino’s boundary, and address ongoing residents’ related noise concerns:  Direct staff to send a letter to the County acknowledging that residents’ complaints regarding noise associated with Plant operations continue and that quarterly noise monitoring should commence as recommended in the DEH December 2015 Report.  Direct staff to provide City Council with updates on the quarterly noise monitoring studies conducted by the County, when available.  Appropriate $15,000 to conduct an independent City-led noise study. Description During the January 19th, 2016 City Council meeting a resident shared concerns regarding noise that she described were emulating from the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company’s Plant located in unincorporated Santa Clara County. She referenced recent noise studies conducted by Santa Clara County and shared a concern that the Company worked to mitigate the noise source during the time the study was conducted, thereby invalidating its results. An additional resident affirmed he had a similar experience with persistent noise from the Plant, which had temporarily diminished during the study timeline but had once again commenced, during his communications with Council during this section of the agenda. In response to these concerns, Council agendized a discussion regarding three items during Council Reports: (1) drafting a letter to send to the County regarding noise issues at Lehigh; (2) reviewing Cupertino’s Noise Ordinance; and (3) considering conducting independent study of the plant, and the costs involved in such a project. This report is prepared to inform that discussion and share a draft letter for Council’s review. 127 2 Background On May 15, 2015, the Department of Environmental Health requested that Lehigh Southwest Cement Company assist with the Department's investigation to determine whether noise levels generated by the Permanente Cement Plant (the “Facility”) comply with the Santa Clara County noise ordinance (Chapter VIII – Control of Noise and Vibration commencing with Section B11-150 of the SCCOC). The County’s Ordinance (Chapter VIII. of the Santa Clara County Code of Ordinances, Section B11-152) establishes exterior noise limits based upon the receiving land use identified in the table shared below, and allows for “corrections” to be applied to the limit if certain conditions and/or time factors apply (e.g. “The noise standard plus five dB for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour”). Table A The investigation was commenced in response to fourteen complaints received by the Department between March and June 2015 describing varied noise emanating from the Plant. This followed a meeting with Lehigh, where officials explained that likely source was a new 295-foot tall exhaust stack and induced draft fan, activated in March 2015 to comply with Bay Area Air Quality management District standards. To that end, Lehigh retained a third-party noise expert, Kansas City, MO-based Burns & McDonnell, to test and analyze noise from the Facility, which was provided to the County on December 14, 2015 (Attachment A). The 52-page report (Attachment A) concluded that the “measurements and modeling show that the sound levels generated at the Facility are in compliance with Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance at the surrounding residential communities, applying a 40 dBA during nighttime hours and 50 dBA during daytime hours, “corrected” universally by 5 dBA over the limits shared in the table above for sampling locations where “steady, audible tones” are present. The results also “demonstrate that the fan modifications reduce sound levels from the Facility.” 128 3 Noise Increment Above Normal Standard Noise Duration in 2-Hour Period 5 DBA 15 minutes 10 dBA 10 minutes 15 dBA 5 minutes 19 dBA 1 minute Land Use at Point of Origin Maximum Noise Level at Complaint Site of Receiving Property Nighttime Daytime Residential 50 dBA 60 dBA Nonresidential 55 dBA 65 dBA At the request of the County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health, dBF Associates, Inc. conducted a peer review of the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company Sound Compliance Study performed by Burns & McDonnell, which was completed on December 30, 2015. The report concludes that the Study was conducted using a methodology and approach consistent with generally accepted industry standards (Attachment B). Based upon these combined findings, the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) issued a 26-page Report of Findings (Attachment C), which shares that both DEH staff and dBF consultants were “present to observe operating conditions and to provide a level of quality control to ensure accurate reporting” and affirms that no readings “revealed a violation of the noise limits.” The Report also catalogs “additional noise monitoring” conducted by DEH staff at alternate locations as “independent verifications” of noise observed, as the Facility was “not notified of any of the measurements dates, times, locations or results.” Findings from these “independent verifications” conclude that “none of the readings…revealed a violation of the County’s noise ordinance due to the predominance of background noise,” (namely observed crickets and traffic). Finally, the Report recommends that the Plant establish a noise monitoring program to regularly evaluate noise and share this data with the public and notes DEH’s intention to perform unannounced quarterly noise monitoring for one year and share its results on the County’s website. As questioned by Council, it should be noted that codified noise limits for Cupertino and Santa Clara County are presented differently. Cupertino’s Ordinance includes a table, shown below that includes daytime (55 dBA) and nighttime (65 dBA) maximum noise levels (Table B, per Section 10.48.040 of the Cupertino Municipal Code) for nonresidential origin sources (vs. receiving land use as defined by the County) and then allows for “Brief Daytime Incidents” (Table C, per Section 10.48.050) for exceeding these limits per two hour period (vs. “corrections” applied by conditions and time factors). Table B Table C 129 4 Given this information and the County’s recent activities, recommended actions for Council’s direction are provided as follows:  Direct staff to finalize and send a letter (Attachment D) to the County acknowledging that residents’ complaints regarding noise associated with Plant operations continue and that quarterly noise monitoring should commence as recommended in the DEH December 30, 2015 Report (Attachment C).  Direct staff to provide City Council with updates on the quarterly noise monitoring studies conducted by the County, when available.  Appropriate $15,000 to conduct an independent City-led noise study (see Fiscal Impacts section below for further details on cost estimates). Sustainability Impact Noise pollution is a quality of life issue. Though prior studies conducted by the County, Lehigh and a series of consultants suggest that topographical, atmospheric, and existing conditions likely contribute to continued community noise-related concerns, persistent and/or intermittent noise pollution is recognized by the Environmental Protection Agency, under the Clean Air Act, as a nuisance that impacts environmental and human health. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact of options outlined in this report depend upon Council direction shared at its meeting. If opting to start first with sending the draft letter to the County requesting the agency fund follow-up quarterly studies, the cost is negligible (postage). Depending upon the response of the County, should Council determine its wishes to pursue and fund an independent study, costs are estimated range from $5,000 - $25,000 depending on the directed scope of work for the consultants commissioned to perform the assessment. The City Manager’s office received initial estimates from four qualified firms that specialize in acoustical services who recommended a range of approaches to conduct a third-party independent monitoring survey and prepare a report detailing general mitigations and additional noise control recommendations. If recommended by Council, it would be appropriate to await and review the County’s forthcoming quarterly report to initiate the City’s own analysis so that it may be informed by DEH findings. As an interim step, several firms suggested staff connect with initial complainants to request they begin to collect logs on the expressed nuisance (e.g. when are they hearing the noise, where do they hear the noise, scale of the noise (e.g. louder, similar, softer to prior experience)) to inform locations that should be prioritized for monitoring equipment locations. This should be a simple phone call to identified individuals that 130 5 will take limited staff time and, therefore, limited costs for the agency and will save consultant costs if the project is advanced. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Erin Cooke, Assistant to the City Manager & Sustainability Manager Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A. December 15, 2015, Burns McDonnell “Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Sound Compliance Study” B. December 30, 2015 dBF Associates Peer Review of Burns McDonnell Study C. December 30, 2015 Department of Environmental Health Report of Findings D. Draft Letter to Santa Clara County, Department of Environmental Health 131 Lehigh Hanson HEIDELBERCCEMENT Group 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 996-4000 December 14, 2015 VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL / RETURN RECEIPT 7015 0640 0007 4329 0020 Michael Balliet, Director County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health Consumer Protection Division 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95112-2716 Re: Permanente Quarry, Noise Complaints - Response to May 15,2015 Correspondence Dear Mr. Balliet: On May 15, 2015, the Department of Environmental Health requested that Lehigh Southwest Cement Company assist with the Department's investigation to determine whether noise levels generated by the Permanente Cement Plant (the "Facility") comply with the Santa Clara County noise ordinance. To that end, Lehigh retained a third-party noise expert, Bums McDonnell, to test and analyze noise from the Facility. Attached is a copy of the Sound Compliance Study prepared by Bums McDonnell based on noise sampling taken at the Facility and in the surrounding residential communities. The Study demonstrates that the Facility is in compliance with the County's ordinances. We trust that this resolves the County's concems regarding compliance, and we look forward to working with the County to address any related concems. Please call with any questions. Sam Barket Environmental Manager Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. cc: Distribution 132 Permanente Quarry, Noise Complaints Response to May 15, 2015 Correspondence Page 1 2 Distribution (via email): Kirk Girard, Director, Department of Planning and Development Marina Rush, Planner III, Department of Planning and Development Kristina Loquist, Board Aide District 5 Alan Sabawi, Lehigh Ana Damonte, Lehigh Sean Hungerford, Harrison, Temblador, Hungerford & Johnson 133 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Sound Compliance Study Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Sound Compliance Study Project No. 86895 December 2015 134 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Sound Compliance Study prepared for Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Sound Compliance Study Santa Clara County, California Project No. 86895 December 2015 prepared by Gabriel Weger Ian Brewe, INCE Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Kansas City, Missouri COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. 135 Sound Compliance Study Table of Contents Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. TOC-1 Burns & McDonnell TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY ....................................................................... 2-1 3.0 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ......................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Use Permit ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Santa Clara County Regulations .......................................................................... 3-1 4.0 SOUND SURVEY .............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Sound Survey Methodology and Conditions ....................................................... 4-1 4.2 Comparative Sound Measurements ..................................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 Comparative Near-Field Measurements ............................................... 4-3 4.2.2 Comparative Far-Field Measurements .................................................. 4-3 4.3 Compliance Far-Field Measurements .................................................................. 4-7 5.0 SOUND MODELING ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Sound Modeling Methodology ............................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Sound Modeling Results ...................................................................................... 5-2 6.0 COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 7-1 APPENDIX A - CERTIFICATES OF CALIBRATION APPENDIX B - FACILITY OPERATING DATA APPENDIX C - COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENT DATA APPENDIX D - COMPLIANCE MEASUREMENT DATA APPENDIX E - MODEL CALIBRATION DATA 136 Sound Compliance Study Table of Contents Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. TOC-2 Burns & McDonnell LIST OF TABLES Page No. Table 2-1: Typical Sound Pressure Levels Associated with Common Sound Sources ............... 2-2 Table 3-1: Santa Clara County Exterior Noise Limits ................................................................. 3-1 Table 4-1: Meteorological Conditions During Sound Measurements ......................................... 4-2 Table 4-2: Facility Operation During Sound Measurements ....................................................... 4-2 Table 4-3: Compliance Sound Level Measurements ................................................................... 4-9 Table 5-1: Modeled Lehigh Facility Sound Levels at Residential Receivers .............................. 5-2 Table 6-1: Comparison of Sound Level Measurements and County Nighttime Noise Limit ....................................................................................................................... 6-2 137 Sound Compliance Study Table of Contents Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. TOC-3 Burns & McDonnell LIST OF FIGURES Page No. Figure 4-1: Near-Field Measurement Points ................................................................................ 4-5 Figure 4-2: Far-Field Comparative Measurement Points ............................................................ 4-6 Figure 4-3: Far-Field Compliance Measurement Points .............................................................. 4-8 Figure 5-1: Modeled Sound Level Contours ............................................................................... 5-3 138 Sound Compliance Study List of Abbreviations Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. i Burns & McDonnell LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation Term/Phrase/Name ANSI American National Standards Institute Burns & McDonnell Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibels Hz hertz ID induced draft ISO International Organization for Standardization Lehigh Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. L90 90% exceedance sound level Leq equivalent-continuous sound level Lx exceedance sound level rpm revolutions per minute 139 Sound Compliance Study Executive Summary Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 1-1 Burns & McDonnell 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (Burns & McDonnell) conducted an environmental sound assessment study for the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (Lehigh), located in an unincorporated area of Santa Clara County, California (Facility). The Facility includes mining operations, material transport conveyors, grinding operations, a cement plant and associated cement kiln, and other cement making processes. The Facility also includes an induced draft (ID) fan and a 295-foot tall exhaust stack. This study was completed to determine whether or not sound generated by the Facility complies with the standards contained in Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance. The objectives of this study were as follows: • Identify the appropriate standards in Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance • Measure sound levels in and around the Facility • Perform modeling based on onsite noise measurements to calculate noise generated by the Facility at nearby residential receivers • Determine if fan modifications made by Lehigh in June 2015 reduced sound levels from the Facility • Compare the measured and modeled sound levels against Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance standards These objectives have been accomplished. Near-field sound level measurements were taken in locations near the ID fan and preheat tower to eliminate extraneous sound sources. Far-field measurements were taken in areas surrounding the Facility, including local residential communities. Measured and modeled sound levels were compared to the County’s ordinance standards. The results of the measurements and modeling show that the sound levels generated at the Facility are in compliance with Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance at the surrounding residential communities. The results also demonstrate that the fan modifications reduced sound levels from the Facility. 140 Sound Compliance Study Acoustical Terminology Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 2-1 Burns & McDonnell 2.0 ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY The term “sound level” is often used to describe two different sound characteristics: sound power and sound pressure. Every source that produces sound has a sound power level. The sound power level is the acoustical energy emitted by a sound source and is an absolute number that is not affected by the surrounding environment. The acoustical energy produced by a source propagates through media as pressure fluctuations. These pressure fluctuations, also called sound pressure, are what human ears hear and microphones measure. Sound is physically characterized by amplitude and frequency. The amplitude of sound is measured in decibels (dB) as the logarithmic ratio of a sound pressure to a reference sound pressure (20 microPascals). The reference sound pressure corresponds to the typical threshold of human hearing. To the average listener, a 3-dB change in a continuous broadband sound is generally considered “just barely perceptible,” a 5-dB change is generally considered “clearly noticeable,” and a 10-dB change is generally considered a doubling (or halving, if the sound is decreasing) of the apparent loudness. Sound waves can occur at many different wavelengths, also known as the frequency. Frequency is measured in hertz (Hz), and is the number of wave cycles per second that occur. The typical human ear can hear frequencies ranging from approximately 20 to 20,000 Hz. Normally, the human ear is most sensitive to sounds in the middle frequencies (1,000 to 8,000 Hz) and is less sensitive to sounds in the lower and higher frequencies. As such, the A-weighting scale was developed to simulate the frequency response of the human ear to sounds at typical environmental levels. The A-weighting scale emphasizes sounds in the middle frequencies and de-emphasizes sounds in the low and high frequencies. Any sound level to which the A-weighting scale has been applied is expressed in A-weighted decibels, or dBA. For reference, the A-weighted sound pressure level and subjective loudness associated with some common sound sources are listed in Table 2-1. 141 Sound Compliance Study Acoustical Terminology Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 2-2 Burns & McDonnell Table 2-1: Typical Sound Pressure Levels Associated with Common Sound Sources Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Subjective Evaluation Environment Outdoor Indoor 140 Deafening Jet aircraft at 75 feet -- 130 Threshold of pain Jet aircraft during takeoff at a distance of 300 feet -- 120 Threshold of feeling Elevated train Hard rock band 110 -- Jet flyover at 1,000 feet Inside propeller plane 100 Very loud Power mower, motorcycle at 25 feet, auto horn at 10 feet, crowd sound at football game -- 90 -- Propeller plane flyover at 1,000 feet, noisy urban street Full symphony or band, food blender, noisy factory 80 Moderately loud Diesel truck (40 mph) at 50 feet Inside auto at high speed, garbage disposal, dishwasher 70 Loud B-757 cabin during flight Close conversation, vacuum cleaner 60 Moderate Air-conditioner condenser at 15 feet, near highway traffic General office 50 Quiet -- Private office 40 -- Farm field with light breeze, birdcalls Soft stereo music in residence 30 Very quiet Quiet residential neighborhood Inside average residence (without TV and stereo) 20 -- Rustling leaves Quiet theater, whisper 10 Just audible -- Human breathing 0 Threshold of hearing -- -- Source: Adapted from Architectural Acoustics, M. David Egan, 1988, and Architectural Graphic Standards, Ramsey and Sleeper, 1994. 142 Sound Compliance Study Acoustical Terminology Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 2-3 Burns & McDonnell Sound in the environment is constantly fluctuating, such as when a car drives by, a dog barks, or a plane passes overhead. Therefore, sound metrics have been developed to quantify fluctuating environmental sound levels. These metrics include the exceedance sound level. The exceedance sound level, Lx, is the sound level exceeded during “x” percent of the sampling period and is also referred to as a statistical sound level. L90 levels are presented throughout this study. The L90 is a common Lx value and represents the sound level with minimal influence from short-term, loud transient sound sources. The L90 represents the sound level exceeded for 90 percent of the time period during which sound levels are measured. The L90 value is regarded as the most accurate tool for measuring relatively constant background noise and for minimizing the influence of isolated spikes in sound levels (i.e., barking dog, door slamming). Use of the L90 value to measure relatively constant noise sources is endorsed by the California Energy Commission to determine noise levels emitted from power plants, which have similar constant noise levels. The L90 value is the optimal tool for this study because the Facility generates a relatively constant sound during normal operations. Other common measurement standards, such as Leq or L50 values, were not considered appropriate for this study because they are highly influenced by short duration noise sources such as cars passing by, dogs barking, and aircrafts. 143 Sound Compliance Study Applicable Regulations Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 3-1 Burns & McDonnell 3.0 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Facility is located in an unincorporated area of Santa Clara County. Therefore, the Facility is subject to the Santa Clara County, CA Code of Ordinances. 3.1 Use Permit The Facility is authorized to operate under a use permit from Santa Clara County. The use permit was first issued on May 8, 1939, and has been modified several times since. The county use permit requires that the Facility comply with the county noise regulations. 3.2 Santa Clara County Regulations The Santa Clara County, CA Code of Ordinances, Chapter VIII Control of Noise and Vibration, Section B11-152 defines the limits for maximum permissible sound levels by receiving land use category, when measured on the receiving property. Table B11-152 from the Code of Ordinances provides the limits for each land use category, and is included below as Table 3-1. The regulation defines nighttime as the hours between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The land uses immediately surrounding the Facility are rural and residential. Table 3-1: Santa Clara County Exterior Noise Limits Receiving Land Use Category Time Period Noise Level (dBA)a One- and Two-Family Residential 10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. 45 55 Multiple-Family Dwelling 10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. 50 Residential Public Space 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. 55 Commercial 10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. 60 65 Light Industrial Any Time 70 Heavy Industrial Any Time 75 Source: Santa Clara County, CA Code of Ordinances Chapter VIII Control of Noise and Vibration, Table B11-152 (a) Levels not to be exceeded more than 30 minutes in any hour The Code of Ordinances provides that noise levels in Table 3-1 will be reduced downwards by five dB where the noise contains a steady, audible tone. As explained below, the Facility was not audible at each sampling location, and, where audible, there was no steady, audible tone or “pure tone” present, as defined by the ordinance. Nonetheless, for the purpose of this study, Burns & McDonnell have assumed that the most restrictive possible standard applies, and assumes a limit of 40 dBA at residential properties during nighttime hours and 50 dBA during daytime hours. 144 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-1 Burns & McDonnell 4.0 SOUND SURVEY A sound survey was performed by Gabriel Weger, Tess Fuller, and Ian Brewe, INCE, all with Burns & McDonnell, on September 8 and 9, 2015. Sound level measurements were taken at far-field measurement locations near residential receivers to determine compliance with county regulations. Sound level measurements were also taken at near-field and far-field locations previously measured on May 6 and 7, 2015. Burns & McDonnell took these additional sound level measurements at previously measured locations to quantify any changes in sound emitted from the Facility due to modifications made to the ID fan. Jeff Fuller, INCE, of dBF Associates, Inc. and Peder Eriksson, Senior Environmental Health Specialist at the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health, selected the far-field measurement locations and witnessed various, representative far-field measurements at these locations. Mr. Fuller was retained as an independent, third-party expert at the request of the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health. 4.1 Sound Survey Methodology and Conditions Measurements were taken using three American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S1.4 type 1 sound- level meters (Larson-Davis Model 831). The sound-level meters were calibrated before and after each set of measurements. None of the calibration level changes exceeded ± 0.5 dB, which is within the acceptable variance per ANSI guidance. A windscreen was used at all times on the microphone to avoid the influence of wind-induced sound increases. Certificates of calibration for the equipment used are provided in Appendix A. Far-field measurements were taken during four time periods over a 24-hour span on September 8 and 9, 2015. Near-field measurements were taken on the morning of September 9, 2015. Meteorological conditions were favorable for conducting ambient sound measurements during each time period. Burns & McDonnell personnel obtained the meteorological conditions presented in Table 4-1 using a Kestrel 3000 anemometer. 145 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-2 Burns & McDonnell Table 4-1: Meteorological Conditions During Sound Measurements Date Measurement Type Time Period Temp. (°F) Relative Humidity (%) Wind Speed (mph) Sky Cover September 8, 2015 Far-Field 7:00 p.m.– 9:00 p.m. 87 19 Calm Clear September 9, 2015 Far-Field 12:00 a.m. – 2:00 a.m. 71 35 Calm Clear September 9, 2015 Far-Field 6:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m. 65 42 Calm Clear September 9, 2015 Far-Field 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. 94 18 0-5 Clear September 9, 2015 Near-Field 8:15 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. 75 30 0-5 Clear Sound measurements were collected during two different operational conditions. During the midnight and morning measurement time periods, the plant was in full operation under normal operating conditions with the fan running at between 759 and 867 revolutions per minute (rpm). Facility noise during these periods would be at its most impactful to the surrounding communities because the fan is operating at its highest level while the extraneous ambient noise (i.e., freeways, etc.) reaches its lowest level. During the evening and noon measurements, the fan operated at a reduced speed, of between 586 and 778 rpm – an operating condition that occurs when kiln maintenance or repairs become necessary. A summary of the operating conditions is provided in Table 4-2; detailed fan operating data is provided in Appendix B. Table 4-2: Facility Operation During Sound Measurements Time Period Kiln Fan (rpm) Minimum Average Maximum Evening 7:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Off 578 643 742 Midnight 12:00 a.m. – 2:00 a.m. On 759 779 800 Morning 6:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m. On 862 863 867 Noon 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. On 586 668 778 Near-Field 8:15 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. On 839 861 864 4.2 Comparative Sound Measurements Sound level measurements were made by Burns & McDonnell on May 6 and 7, 2015, at near-field and far-field locations in and around the Facility. Subsequently, the Facility made modifications to the ID fan in June 2015. On September 8 and 9, 2015, sound level measurements were taken at the same near-field and far-field measurement locations (in addition to County-selected “compliance” locations described in Section 4.3) to determine noise levels emitted from the Facility following the ID fan modifications. 146 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-3 Burns & McDonnell 4.2.1 Comparative Near-Field Measurements Near-field measurements minimize the influence of extraneous background sounds. Since the Facility is not operating in a controlled environment, it is impossible to isolate and measure only the cement plant’s sound levels. However, the near-field sound levels are considered generally representative of the cement plant’s operational sound levels, as most background sound sources have little influence this close to the equipment. The near-field measurements were taken over 10-second intervals along an envelope around the ID fan and stack base, and at other critical points near onsite sound-emitting equipment in addition to the ID fan and stack. The near-field measurement points are labeled NF1 through NF35, as indicated in Figure 4-1. A comparison of the May and September near-field measurements showed an average sound level reduction of 2.2 dB between May and September. Detailed measurement data, and a comparison of the data from each of the near-field measurements, can be found in Appendix C. 4.2.2 Comparative Far-Field Measurements Burns & McDonnell personnel took far-field sound level measurements at six locations, labeled MP1 through MP6, as shown in Figure 4-2. Onsite locations (MP1 to MP4) were selected because they were accessible, close to the Facility property line, and representative of sound levels on all sides of the Facility. Offsite locations (MP5 and MP6) were selected due to their accessibility and proximity to residential areas. Because MP5 is in a residential area, it also is included in the compliance analysis beginning at Section 4.3. County selected locations MP14 and MP15 also were used in the compliance analysis instead of MP6 since they are located in the same area but closer to residences. The far-field sound level measurement periods were 5 minutes long when measured in May and 10- minutes long when measured in September. The measurement duration was increased for September measurements to be consistent with the California Energy Commission’s requirements for short term noise monitoring. Measured values were logged by the sound meter at each measurement location. The sound levels varied at each measurement point due to the extraneous sounds that occurred. Sounds measured included sound associated with the Facility, vehicular traffic from nearby roads (including large trucks), and airplanes flying overhead. Sounds generated by the Facility were audible at some but not all far-field measurement points. Sound emitted by operation of the Facility is mostly constant at a given operating condition. As described in Section 2.0, the metric used to determine compliance was the L90 standard, considered the most appropriate standard for identifying the sound levels associated with constant background noise and for 147 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-4 Burns & McDonnell minimizing the influence of extraneous noise. The lowest, or minimum, L90 readings recorded at each location during the midnight or morning time period have the least amount of extraneous noise and best represent the sound emitted by the Facility during normal operation. Therefore, the minimum-measured L90 sound level during the midnight or early morning time period at each location is considered representative of the levels generated by the Facility. The comparative sound levels measured at each location during the May and September periods are presented in Appendix C. The data demonstrates that the fan modifications in June 2015 caused a reduction in sound levels between 2.1 and 9.8 dBA, with the exception of the sound levels at MP5. The minimum L90 sound levels measured at MP5 in September were higher than the minimum sound levels measured in May. The measured sound levels at MP5 are, however, very low and dominated by intermittent, extraneous noise associated with sources other than the Facility (traffic, crickets, aircrafts, and animals). 148 COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Issued: 10/12/2015 Path: Z:\Clients\ESP\LehighSouthw\85239_Lehigh\Studies\Tech_Consult\Second Sound Study\Report\Figures\Figure 4-1 Near-Field Measurement Points.mxd irbrewe 10/12/2015 Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NORTH 125 0 12562.5 Scale in Feet Figure 4-1 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Near-Field Measurement Points NF29 NF35 NF34 NF33 NF32 NF31 NF30 NF28NF27 NF26 NF25 NF24 NF23 NF22 NF21 NF20 NF19 NF18 NF17 NF16 NF15NF14 NF13 NF1-NF12 Near-Field Measurement Points Source: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.149 COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Issued: 10/12/2015 Path: Z:\Clients\ESP\LehighSouthw\85239_Lehigh\Studies\Tech_Consult\Second Sound Study\Report\Figures\Figure 4-2 Comparative Measurement Points.mxd irbrewe 10/12/2015 Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NORTH 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Scale in Feet Figure 4-2 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Far-Field Comparative Measurement Points !( !( !(!( !( !(MP6 MP5 MP4MP3 MP2 MP1 !(Comparative Far-Field Measurement Points Source: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Lehigh Facility 150 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-7 Burns & McDonnell 4.3 Compliance Far-Field Measurements Burns & McDonnell personnel took far-field, environmental sound level measurements during four time periods on September 8 and 9, 2015, near residential areas in the vicinity of the Facility. These measurements were taken to determine if the Facility’s sound levels are in compliance with the Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance. Sound level measurements were made at eight locations, labeled MP5, MP7, MP8, MP9, MP11, MP14, MP15, and MP16, as shown in Figure 4-3. County representatives and Burns & McDonnell personnel determined that measurements were not feasible at locations MP10, MP12, and MP13 due to restricted access or safety concerns. County selected locations MP14 and MP15 were used in the compliance analysis instead of MP6 since they are located in the same area but closer to residences. The far-field sound level measurement periods were 10-minutes long, and measured values were logged by the sound meter at each measurement location. The sound levels varied at each measurement point due to the extraneous sounds that occurred. Sound generated by the Facility was audible at several, but not all, of the far-field measurement points. 151 COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Issued: 10/12/2015 Path: Z:\Clients\ESP\LehighSouthw\85239_Lehigh\Studies\Tech_Consult\Second Sound Study\Report\Figures\Figure 4-3 Compliance Measurement Points.mxd irbrewe 10/12/2015 Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NORTH 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Scale in Feet Figure 4-3 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Far-Field Compliance Measurement Points !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( MP9 MP8 MP7 MP5 MP16 MP15 MP14 MP11 !(Compliance Far-Field Measurement Points Source: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Lehigh Facility 152 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-9 Burns & McDonnell Extraneous sounds during the measurement periods included vehicular traffic from nearby roads (including large trucks), crickets, birds, and airplanes flying overhead. The measured, L90 sound levels from all noise sources measured at each location (i.e., Facility, traffic, aircraft, animals, crickets, etc.) are presented in Table 4-3. Ambient, L90 sound levels varied from a minimum of 33.1 dBA at MP14 during the evening measurements to a high of 54.9 dBA at MP8 during the morning measurements. Far-field measured values that exceed the noise limits were associated with noise from sources extraneous to the Facility. In these cases, accordingly, sound modeling is required to determine the Facility’s impacts in regards to the compliance. Detailed far-field compliance measurement data is included in Appendix D. Table 4-3: Compliance Sound Level Measurements (Including all extraneous noise sources) Time Period Measurement Point Measured L90 (dBA)a Facility Audible Noise Limit (dBA) Extraneous Noises Se p t e m b e r 8 , 2 0 1 5 7: 0 0 p. m . - 9 : 0 0 p. m . MP5 41.5 Yes 50 Local traffic, highway traffic, aircraft, crickets, and talking MP7 49.0 No 50 Highway traffic dominant, crickets, birds, and aircraft MP8 49.4 No 50 Highway traffic dominant, aircraft, local traffic, birds, and crickets MP9 47.4 Yes 50 Aircraft, local traffic, highway noise, residential HVAC, and crickets MP11 44.2 Yes 50 Highway traffic dominant, aircraft, local traffic, birds, dog barking, and crickets MP14 33.1 Yes 50 Shooting range, highway and local traffic, aircraft, birds, dog barking, and crickets MP15 40.2 Yes 50 Shooting range, highway and local traffic, aircraft, birds, dog barking, and crickets MP16 42.2 No 50 Highway traffic dominant, substation, aircraft, local traffic, birds, and crickets 153 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-10 Burns & McDonnell Time Period Measurement Point Measured L90 (dBA)a Facility Audible Noise Limit (dBA) Extraneous Noises Se p t e m b e r 9 , 2 0 1 5 12 : 0 0 a . m . - 2 : 0 0 a. m . MP5 34.2 Yes 40 Highway traffic, dogs, aircraft, and crickets MP7 48.2 No 40 Highway traffic dominant, crickets, and animal in woods MP8 46.8 No 40 Highway traffic dominant, talking, birds, and crickets MP9 36.6 Yes 40 Highway noise, local traffic, and crickets MP11 40.2 Yes 40 Highway traffic dominant and crickets MP14 45.5 Yes 40 Crickets dominant, highway traffic, and local traffic MP15 50.5 Yes 40 Crickets dominant, highway traffic, aircraft, and local traffic MP16 39.0 No 40 Highway traffic dominant, substation, aircraft, local traffic, birds, and crickets Se p t e m b e r 9 , 2 0 1 5 6: 0 0 a . m . - 8 : 0 0 a. m . MP5 45.8 Yes 40 Local traffic, highway traffic, remote control plane, and aircraft MP7 53.5 No 40 Highway traffic dominant and birds MP8 54.9 No 40 Highway traffic dominant, aircraft, talking, local traffic, birds, and a horn MP9 49.0 Yes 40 Local and highway traffic MP11 43.8 Yes 40 Highway traffic, birds, construction noise, and local traffic MP14 39.7 Yes 40 Local traffic, birds, aircraft, and highway traffic MP15 40.8 Yes 40 Local traffic, trucks, biker, birds, aircraft, and highway traffic MP16 40.7 No 40 Local traffic, siren, birds, aircraft, and highway traffic 154 Sound Compliance Study Sound Survey Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 4-11 Burns & McDonnell Time Period Measurement Point Measured L90 (dBA)a Facility Audible Noise Limit (dBA) Extraneous Noises Se p t e m b e r 9 , 2 0 1 5 12 : 0 0 p. m . - 2 : 0 0 p. m . MP5 37.9 Yes 50 Local traffic, highway traffic, remote control plane, and aircraft MP7 46.0 No 50 Highway traffic dominant and birds MP8 45.6 No 50 Highway traffic dominant, aircraft, talking, local traffic, and birds MP9 36.3 Yes 50 Local and highway traffic MP11 38.6 Yes 50 Highway traffic, aircraft, local traffic, and birds MP14 39.8 Yes 50 Local and highway traffic, birds, and construction noise MP15 36.1 Yes 50 Local and highway traffic, birds, and construction noise MP16 44.7 No 50 Local and highway traffic, birds, and construction noise (a) Measured sound levels include noise created by extraneous sources not associated with the Facility. 155 Sound Compliance Study Sound Modeling Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 5-1 Burns & McDonnell 5.0 SOUND MODELING Field observations demonstrated that Facility-generated sound levels were sometimes dominated by sound levels from extraneous sources, and the Facility’s sound contributions at those locations could not be determined from L90 sound measurements, As a result, a sound modeling program was used to project measured sound levels from the Facility out to the nearest residential properties. Modeling is accepted by the acoustic scientific community as an appropriate method to isolate and calculate sound from specific noise sources without the influence of extraneous sources. Using industry-accepted sound modeling software, CadnaA, the expected sound-pressure levels of the Facility were calculated at the County- selected compliance locations (Section 4.3) based on near-field measurements taken at the Facility in September 2015. 5.1 Sound Modeling Methodology The software is a scaled, three-dimensional program which takes into account each piece of sound- emitting equipment at the Facility and predicts sound-pressure levels over a gridded geographic area of interest. The model calculates sound propagation based on International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9613-2:1996, General Method of Calculation. ISO 9613-2 assesses the sound levels based on the octave band center frequency range from 31.5 to 8,000 Hz. The ISO standard considers sound propagation and directivity. The sound-modeling software calculates sound propagation using omnidirectional, downwind sound propagation and worst-case directivity factors. In other words, the model assumes that each piece of equipment propagates its maximum sound level in all directions at all times. Empirical studies accepted within the industry have demonstrated that modeling may over-predict sound levels in certain directions, and as a result modeling results generally are considered a conservative measure of a facility’s actual sound level. The modeled atmospheric conditions were assumed to be calm, and the temperature and relative humidity were left at the program’s default values. Layers in the atmosphere often form where temperature increases with height (temperature inversions). Sound waves can reflect off of the temperature inversion layer and return to the surface of the earth. This process can cause sound waves at the surface to travel farther than they would under normal atmospheric conditions, especially if the height of the inversion begins near the surface of the earth. Temperature inversions tend to occur mainly at night when winds are light or calm. CadnaA calculates the downwind sound in a manner that is favorable for propagation (worst-case scenario) by assuming a well-developed, moderate ground-based temperature inversion. 156 Sound Compliance Study Sound Modeling Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 5-2 Burns & McDonnell Therefore, by modeling worst-case-scenario sound levels and sound propagation, the predicted sound level results would be higher than what would actually occur, even during an inversion. Reflections and shielding were considered for sound waves encountering physical structures. Sound levels around the Facility can be influenced by the sound reflections from physical structures onsite. The physical structures onsite were modeled with structured facades, which account for the amount of sound reflected and the amount of sound absorbed by the structure itself. To provide a conservative estimate of sound traveling offsite, no foliage or residential structures were included in the model. The area surrounding the Facility has a significant amount of elevation change, which scatters and absorbs the sound waves. Thus, terrain was included to account for surface effects such as ground absorption. However, ground absorption was set to a value such that only half of the potential benefits were realized in the model. With all of these assumptions considered, the model provides a conservative calculation of Facility-generated sound received at the neighboring residential properties. 5.2 Sound Modeling Results The model was used to calculate the Facility-generated noise levels at nearby County-selected compliance locations. The modeled values were then compared to the applicable County standards. The calculated sound levels for the Facility are presented in Table 5-1. Figure 5-1 graphically shows a representation in 5-dB contours of the sound generated by the Facility and projected outward to the County-selected offsite locations. The contours represent the expected sound levels of the Facility only, without the influence of sound generated by extraneous sources. The model shows that the Facility operates within the Santa Clara County noise regulations at each of the County-selected locations. Table 5-1: Modeled Lehigh Facility Sound Levels at Residential Receivers Receiver Modeled Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Santa Clara County Nighttime Limit (dBA)a MP5 32.8 40 MP7 27.9 40 MP8 27.8 40 MP9 31.5 40 MP11 37.5 40 MP14 31.1 40 MP15 30.9 40 MP16 34.8 40 (b) Assumes most restrictive noise limits under Santa Clara County ordinance. 157 COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Issued: 11/25/2015 Path: Z:\Clients\ESP\LehighSouthw\85239_Lehigh\Studies\Tech_Consult\Second Sound Study\Report\Figures\Figure 5-1 Modeled Sound Level Contours.mxd irbrewe 11/25/2015 Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NORTH 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Scale in Feet Figure 5-1 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Modeled Sound Level Contours !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( MP9 MP8 MP7 MP5 MP16 MP15 MP14 MP11 30 dBA 35 dBA 40 dBA 45 dBA 50 dBA 55 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA !(Compliance Measurement Points Source: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Comapny, Inc.158 Sound Compliance Study Compliance Analysis Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 6-1 Burns & McDonnell 6.0 COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS For the purposes of this compliance analysis, Burns & McDonnell assumed the application of the most restrictive noise limits available under the Santa Clara County ordinance, a limit of 40 dBA at residential properties during nighttime hours and 50 dBA during daytime hours. The measured and modeled noise levels were compared against these limits to determine compliance. The Facility is designed to operate 24-hours per day. The sound emitted by normal operation of the Facility is mostly constant. The metric used to determine compliance was the L90, an industry-accepted technique for isolating constant sounds over a given time period. The lowest, or minimum, L90 sound levels measured at each location during the midnight or morning time period best represent the sound emitted by the Facility without influence from extraneous noises. Therefore, at most locations, the minimum-measured L90 value during the midnight or early morning time period was considered most representative of the levels generated by the Facility and was used to determine compliance with the Santa Clara County’s noise ordinances. In addition to the measured values from the sound survey, sound modeling results were analyzed to calculate the amount of Facility-generated sound at each location. Sound modeling was used because field observations indicate that Facility-generated sound levels are often dominated by, and are low in comparison to, sound levels from extraneous sources. For example, constant traffic noise from I-280 dominated the sound levels at measurement locations MP7, MP8 and MP11, and during the evening and midnight measurements, cricket noise (characterized by higher frequency noise between the 2,000- and 8,000–Hz frequencies) was prominent at all measurement locations. As indicated in Table 4-3, the measured sound levels at several locations are not valid representations of the Facility-generated sound levels. At these locations, the modeled sound levels were used to demonstrate compliance with the noise limits. The measured and modeled values provided in Table 6-1 show that the Facility is in compliance with the Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance in the surrounding residential communities. 159 Sound Compliance Study Compliance Analysis Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 6-2 Burns & McDonnell Table 6-1: Comparison of Sound Level Measurements and County Nighttime Noise Limit Measurement Location Minimum Measured L90 (dBA) c Modeled Sound Levels (dBA) Santa Clara County Nighttime Noise Limit (dBA) Compliant with County Noise Ordinance MP5 34.2 32.8 40 Yes MP7 a 48.2 27.9 40 Yes MP8 a 46.8 27.8 40 Yes MP9 36.6 31.5 40 Yes MP11 a 40.2 37.5 40 Yes MP14 39.7 31.1 40 Yes MP15b 40.8 30.9 40 Yes MP16 39.0 34.8 40 Yes (a) Highway traffic noise dominated the sound levels at MP7, MP8 and MP11. Modeled results are used to determine compliance at these locations. (b) Local traffic, aircraft, and other ambient noise influenced the sound levels at MP15. Modeled results are used to determine compliance at this location. (c) Minimum-measured L90 sound levels used because they capture the least amount of extraneous noise and best represent the sound emitted by the Facility’s constant noise source. 160 Sound Compliance Study Conclusion Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. 7-1 Burns & McDonnell 7.0 CONCLUSION A sound assessment study for the Lehigh Southwest Cement Plant was completed to determine whether sound generated by the Facility complies with the noise standards set forth in Santa Clara County’s ordinances. On September 8 and 9, 2015, Burns & McDonnell personnel took far-field, sound level measurements at offsite locations selected by the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health in residential areas in the vicinity of the Facility. Measurements were taken during four different time periods and under different operating conditions to determine if the Facility’s emitted sound levels are in compliance with the most restrictive standards (40 dBA nighttime, 50 dBA daytime) in the County’s noise ordinance. Sound modeling was completed to calculate the Facility-generated sound levels at the County-selected locations. The modeling was based on near-field measured sound levels at the Facility, and was used to calculate the Facility-generated noise levels at each measurement location because some measurement locations were dominated by highway noise and other extraneous, non-Facility noise sources. The results of the measurements and modeling are shown in Table 6-1. The results demonstrate that the sound levels generated at the Facility are in compliance with most restrictive limit (40 dBA nighttime and 50 dBA daytime) contained in Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance at the surrounding residential communities. 161 APPENDIX A - CERTIFICATES OF CALIBRATION 162 163 Certificate of Calibration and Conformance This document certifies that the instrument referenced below meets published specifications per Procedure PRD-P263; ANSI S1.4-1983 (R 2006) Type 1; S1.4A-1985; S1.43-1997 Type 1; S1.11- 2004 Octave Band Class 0; S1.25-1991; IEC 61672-2002 Class 1; 60651 -2001 Type 1; 60804-2000 Type 1; 61260-2001 Class 0; 61252-2002. Manufacturer: Larson Davis Temperature: 75 °F Model Number: 831 23.89 °C Serial Number: 3141 Rel. Humidity: 24.9 % Customer: TMS Rental Pressure: 994.4 mbars Description: Sound Level Meter 994.4 hPa Note: As Found / As Left: In Tolerance Upon receipt for testing, this instrument was found to be: Within the Stated tolerance of the manufacturer's specification Calibration Date: 21-Jan-15 Calibration Due: Calibration Standards Used: Manufacturer Model Serial Number Cal Due Traceability No. Larson Davis LDSigGen/2239 0760/0109 4/14/2015 2013-176324 This Certificate attests that this instrument has been calibrated under the stated conditions with Measurement and Test Equipment (M&TE) Standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). All of the Measurement Standards have been calibrated to their manufacturers' specified accuracy / uncertainty. Evidence of traceability and accuracy is on file at The Modal Shop and/or Larson Davis Corporate Headquarters. An acceptable accuracy ratio between the Standard(s) and the item calibrated has been maintained. This instrument meets or exceeds the manufacturer's published specification unless noted. This calibration complies with ISO 17025 and ANSI Z540. The collective uncertainty of the Measurement Standard used does not exceed 25% of the applicable tolerance for each characteristic calibrated unless otherwise noted. The results documented in this certificate relate only to the item(s) calibrated or tested. Calibration interval assignment and adjustment are the responsibility of the end user. This certificate may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of The Modal Shop. Technician: Wayne Underwood Signature: •••MODAL •shop INC. A PC B GROUP CO. PRD-F242 revNR December 2, 2008 The Modal Shop, Inc. 3149 East Kemper Road Cincinnati, OH 45241 Phone: (513) 351-9919 (800) 860-4867 www.modalshop.com Page 1 of 1 164 Certificate of Calibration and Conformance This document certifies that the instrument referenced below meets published specifications per Procedure PRD-P263; ANSI S1.4-1983 (R 2006) Type 1; S1.4A-1985; S1.43-1997 Type 1; S1.11- 2004 Octave Band Class 0; S1.25-1991; IEC 61672-2002 Class 1; 60651-2001 Type 1; 60804-2000 Type 1; 61260-2001 Class 0; 61252-2002. Manufacturer: Larson Davis Temperature: 72.6 °F Model Number: 831 22.56 °C Serial Number: 3651 Rel. Humidity: 34.5 % Customer: TMS Rental Pressure: 986.9 mbars Description: Sound Level Meter 986.9 hPa Note: As Found / As Left: In Tolerance Upon receipt for testing, this instrument was found to be: Within the Stated tolerance of the manufacturer's specification Calibration Date: 21-Apr-15 Calibration Due: Calibration Standards Used: Manufacturer Model Serial Number Cat Due Traceability No. Larson Davis LDSigGen/2239 0760/0109 4/7/2016 2014-193220 This Certificate attests that this instrument has been calibrated under the stated conditions with Measurement and Test Equipment (M&TE) Standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). All of the Measurement Standards have been calibrated to their manufacturers' specified accuracy / uncertainty. Evidence of traceability and accuracy is on file at The Modal Shop and/or Larson Davis Corporate Headquarters. An acceptable accuracy ratio between the Standard(s) and the item calibrated has been maintained. This instrument meets or exceeds the manufacturer's published specification unless noted. This calibration complies with ISO 17025 and ANSI Z540. The collective uncertainty of the Measurement Standard used does not exceed 25% of the applicable tolerance for each characteristic calibrated unless otherwise noted. The results documented in this certificate relate only to the item(s) calibrated or tested. Calibration interval assignment and adjustment are the responsibility of the end user. This certificate may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of The Modal Shop. Technician: Wayne Underwood Signature: -2T H E SMODAL rrfrS HOP N A I*C It GROUP CO. PRD-F242 revNR December 2, 2008 The Modal Shop, Inc. 3149 East Kemper Road Cincinnati, OH 45241 Phone: (513) 351-9919 (800) 860-4867 www.modalshop.com Page 1 of 1 165 Calibration Certificate Certificate Number 2015007808 Customer: The Modal Shop 3149 East Kemper Road Cincinnati, OH 45241, United States Model Number Serial Number Test Results CAL200 12371 Pass Initial Condition As Manufactured Description Larson Davis CAL200 Acoustic Calibrator Procedure Number D0001.8386 Technician Calibration Date Calibration Due Temperature Humidity Static Pressure Scott Montgomery 17 Aug 2015 24 °C ± 0.3 °C 33 %RH ± 3 %RH 101.4 kPa ± 1 kPa Evaluation Method Compliance Standards The data is aquired by the insert voltage calibration method using the reference microphone's open circuit sensitivity. Data reported in dB re 20 pPa. Compliant to Manufacturer Specifications per D0001.8190 and the following standards: I EC 60942:2003 ANSI S1.40-2006 Issuing lab certifies that the instrument described above meets or exceeds all specifications as stated in the referenced procedure (unless otherwise noted). It has been calibrated using measurement standards traceable to the SI through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), or other national measurement institutes, and meets the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Test points marked with a $ in the uncertainties column do not fall within this laboratory's scope of accreditation. The quality system is registered to ISO 9001:2008. This calibration is a direct comparison of the unit under test to the listed reference standards and did not involve any sampling plans to complete. No allowance has been made for the instability of the test device due to use, time, etc. Such allowances would be made by the customer as needed. The uncertainties were computed in accordance with the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). A coverage factor of approximately 2 sigma (k=2) has been applied to the standard uncertainty to express the expanded uncertainty at approximately 95% confidence level. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, unless permission for the publication of an approved abstract is obtained in writing from the organization issuing this report. Standards Used Description Cal Date Cal Due Cal Standard Agilent 34401A DMM 09/04/2014 09/04/2015 001021 Sound Level Meter / Real Time Analyzer 04/07/2015 04/07/2016 001051 Microphone Calibration System 08/20/2014 08/20/2015 005446 1/2" Preamplifier 10/09/2014 10/09/2015 006506 Larson Davis 1/2" Preamplifier 7-pin LEMO 08/20/2014 08/20/2015 006507 1/2 inch Microphone - RI - 200V 02/26/2015 02/26/2016 006510 Pressure Transducer 05/07/2015 05/07/2016 007310 Larson Davis, a division of PCB Piezotronics, Inc A,n<>i 1681 West 820 North Provo, UT 84601, United States Cert. #3622.01 8/28/2015 4:29:48PM Page 1 of 3 LAR50NDAVI5 ,,6-684.0001 — —A PCB PIEZOTRONiCS DIV. 166 167 MODAL SHOP INC. APCII GROUP CO. Manufacturer: Model Number: Serial Number: Description: ~Certificate of Calibration PCB 377B02 142162 Free-Field Microphone Asset ID: Customer: Calibration Date: Due Date: 3 149 East ICemper R.d. Cincinnati, OH 45241 Ph: 513-351-9919 Fax: 513-458-2172 www.modalshop.com 51386 TMS Rental Jan 30, 2015 16:22:49 Sensitivity: Cal. Results: 250 Hz 1 kHz -26.47 -26.57 dB re. lV/Pa 47.48 46.92 mV/Pa In Tolerance Temperature: Humidity: Ambient Pressure: Polarization Voltage: 75 (24) °F (°C) 20 % 1008.6 mbar 0 VDC -5 -10 Frequency Response Characteristics : The upper curve is the free field characteristic for the microphone with protection grid. The lower curve is the pressure response recorded by electrostatic actuator. Sensitivity : The stated sensitivity is the open-circuit sensitivity. When used with a typical preamplifier the sensitivity will be 0.2 dB lower. -15 10 100 1000 Frequency [Hz] Traceability: The calibration is traceable through 683/281764-12. Notes: Calibration results relate only to the items calibrated. This certificate may not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission. This calibration is performed in compliance with ISO 9001, ISO 17025 and ANSI Z540. Measurement uncertainty (250 Hz sensitivity calibration) at 95% confidence level: 0.30 dB. Calibrated per procedure PRD-P204. User Note : As Found/As Left; In Tolerance 10000 Frequency Response with reference to level at 250 Hz Frequency Upper Frequency Upper Frequency Upper (Hz) (dB) (Hz) (dB) (Hz) (dB) 20 -0.11 630 0.04 4500 -0.39 25 -0.14 800 0.03 5000 -0.41 31.5 -0.03 1000 0.02 5600 -0.38 40 -0.02 1120 0.01 6300 -0.55 50 -0.04 1250 0.00 7100 -0.52 63 -0.02 1400 0.00 8000 -0.41 80 0.02 1600 -0.03 9000 -0.33 100 0.00 1800 -0.05 10000 -0.42 125 0.01 2000 -0.06 11200 -0.36 160 0.00 2240 -0.11 12500 -0.05 200 0.00 2500 -0.13 14000 0.40 250 0.00 2800 -0.16 16000 0.95 315 0.00 3150 -0.20 18000 1.29 400 0.00 3550 -0.26 20000 1.29 500 0.01 4000 -0.33 (Hz) (dB) mm Technician: Wayne Underwood Approval: IACCREPITEPI Calibration Lab CALIBRATION CERT 2649.01 Reference Equipment Used: Manuf. Model Serial GRAS 40AG 9542 Cal. Date Due Date 9/15/2014 9/15/2015 : 1 of 1 168 169 MODAL SHOP INC. A PC B GROUP CO. ~Certificate of Calibration- 3149 East Kemper R.d. Cincinnati, OH 45241 Eh : 513-351-9919 Fax: 513-458-2172 www.modalshop.com Manufacturer: PCB Model Number: 377B02 Serial Number: Asset ID: Description: LW137584 49582 Free-Field Microphone Sensitivity: 250 Hz 1 kHz -26.62 -26.74 dB re. lV/Pa 46.68 46.05 mV/Pa Cal. Results: In Tolerance Customer: Address: Calibration Date: Due Date: Temperature: Humidity: Ambient Pressure: Polarization Voltage: TMS Rental Jun 10, 2015 09:57:01 72 (22) °F (°C) 46 % 990.4 mbar 0 VDC -5 ' Frequency Response Characteristics : The upper curve is the free field characteristic i for the microphone with protection grid. The lower curve is the pressure response ' recorded by electrostatic actuator. -io -: Sensitivity : The stated sensitivity is the open-circuit sensitivity. When used with a ; typical preamplifier the sensitivity will be 0.2 dB lower. -15 10 Traceability: Notes: 100 1000 10000 Frequency [Hz] User Note: The calibration is traceable through 683/281764-12. Calibration results relate only to the items calibrated. This certificate may not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission. This calibration is performed in compliance with ISO 9001, ISO 17025 and ANSI Z540. Measurement uncertainty (250 Hz sensitivity calibration) at 95% confidence level: Calibrated per procedure PRD-P204. As Found/As Left In Tolerance 0.30 dB. Frequency Response with reference to level at 250 Hz Frequency Upper Frequency Upper Frequency Upper (Hz) (dB) (Hz) (dB) (Hz) (dB) 20 -0.09 630 -0.01 4500 -0.53 25 -0.01 800 0.02 5000 -0.63 31.5 -0.03 1000 0.00 5600 -0.68 40 -0.03 1120 0.00 6300 -0.72 50 0.00 1250 -0.02 7100 -0.73 63 -0.01 1400 -0.03 8000 -0.66 80 0.01 1600 -0.07 9000 -0.57 100 0.02 1800 -0.09 10000 -0.60 125 0.01 2000 -0.11 11200 -0.57 160 0.01 2240 -0.16 12500 -0.32 200 0.01 2500 -0.19 14000 0.18 250 0.00 2800 -0.24 16000 0.73 315 0.01 3150 -0.30 18000 0.71 400 0.00 3550 -0.38 20000 0.20 500 0.01 4000 -0.47 Frequency (Hz) Upper (dB) mm Technician: Wayne Underwood Approval: IACCREPITEPI Calibration Lab CALIBRATION CERT 2649.01 Reference Equipment Used: Manuf. Model Serial GRAS 40AG 9542 Cal. Date 9/15/2014 Page 1 of 1 Due Date 9/15/2015 170 APPENDIX B - FACILITY OPERATING DATA 171 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix B Operating Data Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm) 9/8/15 19:00578 9/8/15 19:53578 9/8/15 20:46721 9/8/15 21:39738 9/8/15 19:01581 9/8/15 19:54578 9/8/15 20:47723 9/8/15 21:40738 9/8/15 19:02581 9/8/15 19:55578 9/8/15 20:48721 9/8/15 21:41738 9/8/15 19:03578 9/8/15 19:56578 9/8/15 20:49724 9/8/15 21:42738 9/8/15 19:04578 9/8/15 19:57578 9/8/15 20:50724 9/8/15 21:43738 9/8/15 19:05578 9/8/15 19:58585 9/8/15 20:51725 9/8/15 21:44738 9/8/15 19:06579 9/8/15 19:59592 9/8/15 20:52731 9/8/15 21:45738 9/8/15 19:07578 9/8/15 20:00599 9/8/15 20:53727 9/8/15 21:46738 9/8/15 19:08578 9/8/15 20:01605 9/8/15 20:54732 9/8/15 21:47738 9/8/15 19:09578 9/8/15 20:02612 9/8/15 20:55732 9/8/15 21:48738 9/8/15 19:10580 9/8/15 20:03621 9/8/15 20:56732 9/8/15 21:49738 9/8/15 19:11 578 9/8/15 20:04 629 9/8/15 20:57732 9/8/15 21:50738 9/8/15 19:12578 9/8/15 20:05637 9/8/15 20:58732 9/8/15 21:51738 9/8/15 19:13580 9/8/15 20:06656 9/8/15 20:59732 9/8/15 21:52738 9/8/15 19:14578 9/8/15 20:07681 9/8/15 21:00732 9/8/15 21:53738 9/8/15 19:15578 9/8/15 20:08701 9/8/15 21:01732 9/8/15 21:54738 9/8/15 19:16578 9/8/15 20:09711 9/8/15 21:02732 9/8/15 21:55738 9/8/15 19:17581 9/8/15 20:10716 9/8/15 21:03732 9/8/15 21:56738 9/8/15 19:18578 9/8/15 20:11717 9/8/15 21:04732 9/8/15 21:57742 9/8/15 19:19578 9/8/15 20:12716 9/8/15 21:05729 9/8/15 21:58738 9/8/15 19:20578 9/8/15 20:13711 9/8/15 21:06728 9/8/15 21:59738 9/8/15 19:21578 9/8/15 20:14703 9/8/15 21:07726 9/8/15 22:00741 9/8/15 19:22584 9/8/15 20:15 695 9/8/15 21:08 727 9/8/15 19:23586 9/8/15 20:16692 9/8/15 21:09731 9/8/15 19:24586 9/8/15 20:17686 9/8/15 21:10732 9/8/15 19:25586 9/8/15 20:18686 9/8/15 21:11732 9/8/15 19:26586 9/8/15 20:19687 9/8/15 21:12732 9/8/15 19:27586 9/8/15 20:20690 9/8/15 21:13732 9/8/15 19:28586 9/8/15 20:21703 9/8/15 21:14732 9/8/15 19:29584 9/8/15 20:22715 9/8/15 21:15732 9/8/15 19:30582 9/8/15 20:23718 9/8/15 21:16732 9/8/15 19:31582 9/8/15 20:24716 9/8/15 21:17732 9/8/15 19:32580 9/8/15 20:25713 9/8/15 21:18732 9/8/15 19:33580 9/8/15 20:26708 9/8/15 21:19738 9/8/15 19:34582 9/8/15 20:27711 9/8/15 21:20738 9/8/15 19:35583 9/8/15 20:28724 9/8/15 21:21734 9/8/15 19:36579 9/8/15 20:29737 9/8/15 21:22733 9/8/15 19:37 578 9/8/15 20:30 738 9/8/15 21:23733 9/8/15 19:38578 9/8/15 20:31732 9/8/15 21:24734 9/8/15 19:39578 9/8/15 20:32729 9/8/15 21:25732 9/8/15 19:40578 9/8/15 20:33723 9/8/15 21:26732 9/8/15 19:41578 9/8/15 20:34720 9/8/15 21:27732 9/8/15 19:42578 9/8/15 20:35716 9/8/15 21:28734 9/8/15 19:43578 9/8/15 20:36716 9/8/15 21:29735 9/8/15 19:44578 9/8/15 20:37716 9/8/15 21:30738 9/8/15 19:45578 9/8/15 20:38716 9/8/15 21:31738 9/8/15 19:46579 9/8/15 20:39716 9/8/15 21:32737 9/8/15 19:47578 9/8/15 20:40716 9/8/15 21:33733 9/8/15 19:48578 9/8/15 20:41716 9/8/15 21:34737 9/8/15 19:49580 9/8/15 20:42716 9/8/15 21:35738 9/8/15 19:50582 9/8/15 20:43716 9/8/15 21:36738 9/8/15 19:51578 9/8/15 20:44 716 9/8/15 21:37 735 9/8/15 19:52578 9/8/15 20:45716 9/8/15 21:38737 172 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix B Operating Data Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm) 9/9/15 0:00799 9/9/15 0:53767 9/9/15 1:46778 9/9/15 0:01793 9/9/15 0:54770 9/9/15 1:47780 9/9/15 0:02796 9/9/15 0:55763 9/9/15 1:48781 9/9/15 0:03799 9/9/15 0:56769 9/9/15 1:49786 9/9/15 0:04800 9/9/15 0:57770 9/9/15 1:50786 9/9/15 0:05800 9/9/15 0:58770 9/9/15 1:51786 9/9/15 0:06800 9/9/15 0:59770 9/9/15 1:52786 9/9/15 0:07800 9/9/15 1:00770 9/9/15 1:53786 9/9/15 0:08800 9/9/15 1:01773 9/9/15 1:54786 9/9/15 0:09800 9/9/15 1:02781 9/9/15 1:55786 9/9/15 0:10800 9/9/15 1:03786 9/9/15 1:56786 9/9/15 0:11800 9/9/15 1:04785 9/9/15 1:57786 9/9/15 0:12798 9/9/15 1:05778 9/9/15 1:58786 9/9/15 0:13800 9/9/15 1:06771 9/9/15 1:59786 9/9/15 0:14800 9/9/15 1:07 765 9/9/15 2:00 788 9/9/15 0:15799 9/9/15 1:08762 9/9/15 0:16799 9/9/15 1:09762 9/9/15 0:17799 9/9/15 1:10762 9/9/15 0:18799 9/9/15 1:11762 9/9/15 0:19799 9/9/15 1:12762 9/9/15 0:20798 9/9/15 1:13762 9/9/15 0:21798 9/9/15 1:14760 9/9/15 0:22792 9/9/15 1:15759 9/9/15 0:23790 9/9/15 1:16763 9/9/15 0:24786 9/9/15 1:17763 9/9/15 0:25786 9/9/15 1:18762 9/9/15 0:26787 9/9/15 1:19762 9/9/15 0:27790 9/9/15 1:20762 9/9/15 0:28790 9/9/15 1:21762 9/9/15 0:29786 9/9/15 1:22764 9/9/15 0:30786 9/9/15 1:23762 9/9/15 0:31785 9/9/15 1:24762 9/9/15 0:32784 9/9/15 1:25762 9/9/15 0:33784 9/9/15 1:26762 9/9/15 0:34 782 9/9/15 1:27 763 9/9/15 0:35782 9/9/15 1:28765 9/9/15 0:36780 9/9/15 1:29764 9/9/15 0:37779 9/9/15 1:30764 9/9/15 0:38775 9/9/15 1:31764 9/9/15 0:39770 9/9/15 1:32765 9/9/15 0:40770 9/9/15 1:33769 9/9/15 0:41772 9/9/15 1:34770 9/9/15 0:42770 9/9/15 1:35770 9/9/15 0:43770 9/9/15 1:36770 9/9/15 0:44773 9/9/15 1:37770 9/9/15 0:45778 9/9/15 1:38773 9/9/15 0:46771 9/9/15 1:39778 9/9/15 0:47770 9/9/15 1:40778 9/9/15 0:48770 9/9/15 1:41778 9/9/15 0:49770 9/9/15 1:42778 9/9/15 0:50770 9/9/15 1:43778 9/9/15 0:51770 9/9/15 1:44778 9/9/15 0:52767 9/9/15 1:45778 173 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix B Operating Data Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm) 9/9/15 6:30863 9/9/15 7:23862 9/9/15 8:16864 9/9/15 9:09790 9/9/15 6:31864 9/9/15 7:24862 9/9/15 8:17862 9/9/15 9:10783 9/9/15 6:32865 9/9/15 7:25862 9/9/15 8:18862 9/9/15 9:11775 9/9/15 6:33862 9/9/15 7:26862 9/9/15 8:19862 9/9/15 9:12768 9/9/15 6:34863 9/9/15 7:27862 9/9/15 8:20864 9/9/15 9:13761 9/9/15 6:35864 9/9/15 7:28862 9/9/15 8:21862 9/9/15 9:14753 9/9/15 6:36867 9/9/15 7:29862 9/9/15 8:22862 9/9/15 9:15745 9/9/15 6:37865 9/9/15 7:30864 9/9/15 8:23864 9/9/15 9:16738 9/9/15 6:38863 9/9/15 7:31863 9/9/15 8:24862 9/9/15 9:17731 9/9/15 6:39864 9/9/15 7:32863 9/9/15 8:25862 9/9/15 9:18724 9/9/15 6:40864 9/9/15 7:33864 9/9/15 8:26862 9/9/15 9:19717 9/9/15 6:41 862 9/9/15 7:34 862 9/9/15 8:27862 9/9/15 9:20709 9/9/15 6:42862 9/9/15 7:35862 9/9/15 8:28862 9/9/15 9:21701 9/9/15 6:43865 9/9/15 7:36862 9/9/15 8:29862 9/9/15 9:22693 9/9/15 6:44864 9/9/15 7:37862 9/9/15 8:30862 9/9/15 9:23689 9/9/15 6:45863 9/9/15 7:38862 9/9/15 8:31862 9/9/15 9:24681 9/9/15 6:46864 9/9/15 7:39862 9/9/15 8:32862 9/9/15 9:25673 9/9/15 6:47866 9/9/15 7:40864 9/9/15 8:33862 9/9/15 9:26666 9/9/15 6:48862 9/9/15 7:41862 9/9/15 8:34862 9/9/15 9:27659 9/9/15 6:49862 9/9/15 7:42863 9/9/15 8:35862 9/9/15 9:28651 9/9/15 6:50862 9/9/15 7:43863 9/9/15 8:36862 9/9/15 9:29644 9/9/15 6:51862 9/9/15 7:44862 9/9/15 8:37862 9/9/15 9:30637 9/9/15 6:52862 9/9/15 7:45 862 9/9/15 8:38 864 9/9/15 9:31629 9/9/15 6:53862 9/9/15 7:46862 9/9/15 8:39862 9/9/15 9:32623 9/9/15 6:54865 9/9/15 7:47862 9/9/15 8:40862 9/9/15 9:33615 9/9/15 6:55863 9/9/15 7:48862 9/9/15 8:41862 9/9/15 9:34608 9/9/15 6:56863 9/9/15 7:49862 9/9/15 8:42862 9/9/15 9:35601 9/9/15 6:57864 9/9/15 7:50862 9/9/15 8:43862 9/9/15 9:36600 9/9/15 6:58867 9/9/15 7:51862 9/9/15 8:44862 9/9/15 9:37600 9/9/15 6:59864 9/9/15 7:52862 9/9/15 8:45862 9/9/15 9:38599 9/9/15 7:00863 9/9/15 7:53862 9/9/15 8:46862 9/9/15 9:39592 9/9/15 7:01862 9/9/15 7:54862 9/9/15 8:47862 9/9/15 9:40592 9/9/15 7:02864 9/9/15 7:55862 9/9/15 8:48862 9/9/15 9:41592 9/9/15 7:03862 9/9/15 7:56862 9/9/15 8:49 862 9/9/15 9:42 592 9/9/15 7:04862 9/9/15 7:57862 9/9/15 8:50862 9/9/15 9:43592 9/9/15 7:05865 9/9/15 7:58862 9/9/15 8:51862 9/9/15 9:44586 9/9/15 7:06866 9/9/15 7:59863 9/9/15 8:52862 9/9/15 9:45589 9/9/15 7:07865 9/9/15 8:00863 9/9/15 8:53857 9/9/15 9:46592 9/9/15 7:08864 9/9/15 8:01863 9/9/15 8:54857 9/9/15 9:47592 9/9/15 7:09864 9/9/15 8:02866 9/9/15 8:55855 9/9/15 9:48592 9/9/15 7:10862 9/9/15 8:03865 9/9/15 8:56854 9/9/15 9:49592 9/9/15 7:11864 9/9/15 8:04864 9/9/15 8:57852 9/9/15 9:50592 9/9/15 7:12862 9/9/15 8:05863 9/9/15 8:58846 9/9/15 9:51592 9/9/15 7:13863 9/9/15 8:06864 9/9/15 8:59839 9/9/15 9:52592 9/9/15 7:14863 9/9/15 8:07862 9/9/15 9:00836 9/9/15 9:53 592 9/9/15 7:15864 9/9/15 8:08862 9/9/15 9:01843 9/9/15 9:54592 9/9/15 7:16866 9/9/15 8:09865 9/9/15 9:02841 9/9/15 9:55589 9/9/15 7:17862 9/9/15 8:10862 9/9/15 9:03835 9/9/15 9:56591 9/9/15 7:18862 9/9/15 8:11862 9/9/15 9:04827 9/9/15 9:57592 9/9/15 7:19862 9/9/15 8:12864 9/9/15 9:05819 9/9/15 9:58592 9/9/15 7:20864 9/9/15 8:13862 9/9/15 9:06811 9/9/15 9:59588 9/9/15 7:21863 9/9/15 8:14863 9/9/15 9:07803 9/9/15 10:00587 9/9/15 7:22862 9/9/15 8:15863 9/9/15 9:08797 174 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix B Operating Data Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm)Date / TimeFan (rpm) 9/9/15 11:30586 9/9/15 12:23649 9/9/15 13:16724 9/9/15 11:31586 9/9/15 12:24654 9/9/15 13:17724 9/9/15 11:32586 9/9/15 12:25654 9/9/15 13:18728 9/9/15 11:33586 9/9/15 12:26659 9/9/15 13:19732 9/9/15 11:34586 9/9/15 12:27662 9/9/15 13:20735 9/9/15 11:35586 9/9/15 12:28662 9/9/15 13:21738 9/9/15 11:36586 9/9/15 12:29662 9/9/15 13:22738 9/9/15 11:37586 9/9/15 12:30662 9/9/15 13:23738 9/9/15 11:38586 9/9/15 12:31662 9/9/15 13:24740 9/9/15 11:39586 9/9/15 12:32662 9/9/15 13:25741 9/9/15 11:40586 9/9/15 12:33667 9/9/15 13:26746 9/9/15 11:41586 9/9/15 12:34670 9/9/15 13:27746 9/9/15 11:42586 9/9/15 12:35670 9/9/15 13:28746 9/9/15 11:43591 9/9/15 12:36677 9/9/15 13:29746 9/9/15 11:44599 9/9/15 12:37 679 9/9/15 13:30 746 9/9/15 11:45601 9/9/15 12:38680 9/9/15 13:31751 9/9/15 11:46611 9/9/15 12:39683 9/9/15 13:32755 9/9/15 11:47617 9/9/15 12:40684 9/9/15 13:33758 9/9/15 11:48624 9/9/15 12:41685 9/9/15 13:34762 9/9/15 11:49626 9/9/15 12:42686 9/9/15 13:35762 9/9/15 11:50630 9/9/15 12:43689 9/9/15 13:36762 9/9/15 11:51630 9/9/15 12:44685 9/9/15 13:37760 9/9/15 11:52631 9/9/15 12:45686 9/9/15 13:38761 9/9/15 11:53631 9/9/15 12:46692 9/9/15 13:39762 9/9/15 11:54631 9/9/15 12:47699 9/9/15 13:40762 9/9/15 11:55631 9/9/15 12:48700 9/9/15 13:41762 9/9/15 11:56632 9/9/15 12:49700 9/9/15 13:42764 9/9/15 11:57634 9/9/15 12:50700 9/9/15 13:43767 9/9/15 11:58640 9/9/15 12:51700 9/9/15 13:44 770 9/9/15 11:59640 9/9/15 12:52703 9/9/15 13:45770 9/9/15 12:00640 9/9/15 12:53708 9/9/15 13:46770 9/9/15 12:01640 9/9/15 12:54708 9/9/15 13:47770 9/9/15 12:02640 9/9/15 12:55708 9/9/15 13:48770 9/9/15 12:03640 9/9/15 12:56708 9/9/15 13:49770 9/9/15 12:04640 9/9/15 12:57708 9/9/15 13:50770 9/9/15 12:05640 9/9/15 12:58708 9/9/15 13:51770 9/9/15 12:06640 9/9/15 12:59711 9/9/15 13:52770 9/9/15 12:07640 9/9/15 13:00715 9/9/15 13:53771 9/9/15 12:08640 9/9/15 13:01716 9/9/15 13:54775 9/9/15 12:09640 9/9/15 13:02715 9/9/15 13:55775 9/9/15 12:10640 9/9/15 13:03711 9/9/15 13:56772 9/9/15 12:11644 9/9/15 13:04716 9/9/15 13:57771 9/9/15 12:12643 9/9/15 13:05716 9/9/15 13:58776 9/9/15 12:13 646 9/9/15 13:06 716 9/9/15 13:59778 9/9/15 12:14646 9/9/15 13:07710 9/9/15 14:00778 9/9/15 12:15646 9/9/15 13:08716 9/9/15 12:16646 9/9/15 13:09716 9/9/15 12:17646 9/9/15 13:10716 9/9/15 12:18646 9/9/15 13:11716 9/9/15 12:19646 9/9/15 13:12718 9/9/15 12:20649 9/9/15 13:13720 9/9/15 12:21654 9/9/15 13:14717 9/9/15 12:22653 9/9/15 13:15724 175 APPENDIX C - COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENT DATA 176 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix C ‐ Comparative Data Far‐Field Measurement Data Measurement PointTime Period May 6 - 7 Overall L90 (dBA)Sept 8 - 9 Overall L90 (dBA)Overall Change (dBA) MP1Evening ‐‐42.2 ‐‐ MP2Evening63.958.3 ‐5.6 MP3 Evening 46.0 42.6 ‐3.4 MP4 Evening 46.6 50.0 3.4 MP5 Evening 42.3 41.5 ‐0.8 MP6 Evening ‐‐31.2 ‐‐ MP1 Midnight 52.3 47.4 ‐4.9 MP2 Midnight 63.1 60.0 ‐3.1 MP3 Midnight 44.2 42.1 ‐2.1 MP4 Midnight 46.4 47.0 0.6 MP5 Midnight 30.9 34.2 3.3 MP6 Midnight ‐‐53.0 ‐‐ MP1 Morning 51.5 45.8 ‐5.7 MP2 Morning 62.8 61.3 ‐1.5 MP3 Morning 46.1 46.9 0.8 MP4 Morning 53.7 44.7 ‐9.0 MP5 Morning 40.4 45.8 5.4 MP6 Morning 45.3 35.5 ‐9.8 MP1 Noon 51.7 44.3 ‐7.4 MP2 Noon 62.7 58.1 ‐4.6 MP3 Noon 47.2 49.4 2.2 MP4 Noon 46.6 41.7 ‐4.9 MP5 Noon 40.1 37.9 ‐2.2 MP6 Noon ‐‐38.7 ‐‐ Leq = Average sound level. L90 = Sound level exceed 90% of the measurement period. Note: The noise measurements presented in the table represents all noise sources recorded at each location, and does not isolate noise generated exclusively by the facility 177 Le h i g h So u t h w e s t Ce m e n t Co . Ap p e n d i x C Fa r ‐Fi e l d Me a s u r e m e n t Da t a Ma y 6 an d 7, 20 1 5 Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 To n a l L i m i t s 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 88 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Ev e n i n g Ti m e Pe r i o d 7: 0 0 PM to 9: 0 0 PM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 53 . 1 ‐‐ MP 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 57 . 3 5 6 . 0 5 4 . 8 5 6 . 8 5 7 . 6 5 5 . 6 5 0 . 8 4 6 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 5 0 . 2 4 7 . 6 5 4 . 0 4 6 . 0 4 6 . 7 52 . 0 4 4 . 1 4 2 . 9 4 1 . 5 3 8 . 2 3 5 . 4 3 1 . 0 2 8 . 0 2 3 . 7 2 1 . 3 1 9 . 2 1 7 . 8 1 6 . 0 14.5 MP 2 6 6 . 0 6 3 . 9 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 66 . 3 7 0 . 4 6 6 . 7 7 0 . 3 6 6 . 1 6 3 . 3 6 1 . 8 6 0 . 3 6 3 . 0 6 4 . 5 5 7 . 9 5 9 . 0 71 . 2 59 . 1 5 8 . 0 59 . 4 5 4 . 3 5 3 . 4 5 2 . 3 4 9 . 9 4 7 . 6 4 7 . 0 4 5 . 0 4 0 . 6 3 7 . 3 3 2 . 0 2 6 . 4 2 3 . 1 21.3 MP 3 4 9 . 8 4 6 . 0 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 65 . 0 6 3 . 5 6 1 . 5 5 9 . 9 5 8 . 0 5 5 . 6 5 3 . 3 4 9 . 4 4 8 . 4 5 0 . 2 4 3 . 3 4 1 . 1 53 . 2 37 . 9 3 8 . 3 44 . 4 4 0 . 9 4 0 . 4 3 9 . 1 3 5 . 9 3 2 . 5 2 9 . 4 2 8 . 3 2 6 . 3 2 1 . 7 2 0 . 7 2 0 . 8 2 1 . 5 21.6 MP 4 4 9 . 7 4 6 . 6 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 63 . 8 6 1 . 8 5 9 . 0 5 7 . 5 5 4 . 6 5 1 . 6 5 1 . 5 4 7 . 4 4 6 . 7 4 7 . 9 4 2 . 8 4 3 . 6 5 0 . 1 4 4 . 1 4 3 . 8 43 . 6 4 1 . 6 4 0 . 5 3 8 . 7 3 4 . 7 3 1 . 7 2 8 . 1 2 6 . 0 2 5 . 7 2 6 . 2 2 7 . 2 2 7 . 1 2 7 . 9 28.3 MP 5 4 5 . 7 4 2 . 3 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 62 . 8 6 1 . 1 5 9 . 2 5 6 . 9 5 4 . 2 5 3 . 1 5 0 . 5 4 7 . 7 4 7 . 2 4 4 . 7 4 0 . 9 3 9 . 5 3 8 . 7 3 5 . 9 3 5 . 3 36 . 0 3 6 . 4 3 6 . 6 3 6 . 0 3 4 . 2 3 2 . 5 3 1 . 6 3 0 . 6 3 4 . 6 3 4 . 9 2 7 . 5 2 3 . 0 2 2 . 3 20.4 Mi d n i g h t Ti m e Pe r i o d 12 : 0 0 AM to 2: 0 0 AM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 54 . 0 5 2 . 3 MP 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 53 . 1 5 4 . 7 5 3 . 4 5 9 . 2 6 1 . 3 5 7 . 1 5 1 . 6 4 9 . 9 5 5 . 0 5 5 . 2 5 2 . 1 4 6 . 8 57 . 5 4 4 . 8 4 7 . 7 5 0 . 0 4 4 . 5 4 6 . 2 4 0 . 9 3 9 . 5 3 6 . 7 3 2 . 7 3 0 . 9 2 9 . 0 2 9 . 8 24.922.220.216.6 MP 2 6 3 . 9 6 3 . 1 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 63 . 9 7 0 . 6 6 7 . 8 7 2 . 4 6 6 . 5 6 3 . 3 6 3 . 1 5 9 . 6 6 1 . 6 6 4 . 5 5 7 . 7 5 8 . 1 68 . 1 5 8 . 4 5 8 . 9 5 8 . 3 5 3 . 7 5 2 . 8 5 2 . 1 4 9 . 0 4 7 . 9 4 7 . 3 4 5 . 2 4 1 . 3 3 7 . 3 30.523.618.816.9 MP 3 4 6 . 8 4 4 . 2 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 53 . 2 5 6 . 6 5 5 . 0 5 6 . 9 5 6 . 2 5 3 . 3 5 2 . 6 4 9 . 5 4 9 . 8 5 6 . 3 4 1 . 2 3 4 . 8 49 . 0 3 4 . 1 3 5 . 2 4 1 . 5 3 6 . 6 3 9 . 0 3 6 . 6 3 1 . 4 2 6 . 5 2 1 . 9 1 8 . 2 1 5 . 3 2 8 . 1 20.612.913.813.0 MP 4 4 7 . 8 4 6 . 4 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 50 . 1 5 3 . 4 4 8 . 9 5 1 . 8 5 0 . 9 4 8 . 2 4 9 . 2 4 5 . 3 4 6 . 6 5 0 . 4 4 3 . 4 4 3 . 4 47 . 9 4 2 . 9 4 2 . 7 4 2 . 5 4 1 . 0 3 8 . 8 3 8 . 4 3 3 . 3 3 1 . 4 2 6 . 9 2 7 . 5 2 0 . 8 2 0 . 2 20.521.622.322.9 MP 5 3 3 . 7 3 0 . 9 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 42 . 2 4 2 . 8 4 2 . 2 4 4 . 0 4 3 . 8 4 2 . 3 4 0 . 1 3 7 . 1 3 6 . 0 3 2 . 0 2 7 . 0 2 5 . 5 34 . 2 2 6 . 0 2 5 . 5 2 7 . 6 2 3 . 9 2 5 . 3 2 4 . 9 2 2 . 8 1 8 . 6 1 4 . 6 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 6 1 7 . 7 15.213.313.512.8 Mo r n i n g Ti m e Pe r i o d 8: 0 0 AM to 10 : 0 0 AM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 53 . 0 5 1 . 5 MP 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 54 . 4 5 3 . 6 5 3 . 3 5 8 . 0 5 9 . 4 55 . 9 5 4 . 0 5 3 . 0 5 2 . 7 5 3 . 7 4 9 . 9 4 7 . 3 5 3 . 9 4 3 . 7 4 4 . 0 5 1 . 2 4 4 . 2 4 1 . 6 4 3 . 0 4 0 . 4 3 8 . 0 3 5 . 0 3 2 . 4 2 8 . 3 2 4 . 4 2 0 . 3 1 8 . 0 15.713.6 MP 2 6 4 . 5 6 2 . 8 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 64 . 5 6 9 . 9 6 6 . 6 7 1 . 8 6 8 . 0 63 . 3 6 3 . 6 6 0 . 2 6 3 . 1 6 5 . 7 5 6 . 8 5 7 . 4 7 0 . 0 5 7 . 7 5 7 . 5 5 8 . 8 5 3 . 6 5 3 . 2 5 1 . 1 4 8 . 9 4 7 . 6 4 6 . 5 4 4 . 9 4 1 . 7 3 8 . 3 3 2 . 5 2 6 . 8 21.816.8 MP 3 4 8 . 1 4 6 . 1 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 56 . 4 5 6 . 5 5 6 . 4 5 9 . 2 5 6 . 8 54 . 7 5 4 . 0 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 3 5 5 . 3 4 5 . 1 4 1 . 2 5 0 . 9 3 6 . 8 3 7 . 0 4 1 . 8 3 7 . 7 3 9 . 2 3 7 . 9 3 4 . 8 3 0 . 3 3 0 . 5 3 1 . 9 2 8 . 6 2 1 . 6 2 0 . 5 1 9 . 4 18.618.9 MP 4 5 7 . 5 5 3 . 7 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 9 5 6 . 0 5 4 . 3 5 5 . 9 5 5 . 4 72 . 0 5 8 . 2 5 5 . 6 5 6 . 5 5 4 . 3 5 0 . 9 5 1 . 2 5 3 . 7 5 1 . 4 5 1 . 3 5 1 . 0 4 9 . 0 4 8 . 7 4 8 . 5 4 6 . 1 4 5 . 3 4 3 . 5 4 2 . 1 3 9 . 8 3 7 . 0 3 5 . 0 3 4 . 2 33.733.2 MP 5 5 9 . 1 4 0 . 4 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 50 . 9 5 1 . 4 5 2 . 0 5 4 . 4 5 8 . 2 57 . 5 5 7 . 8 5 2 . 6 5 0 . 5 4 9 . 5 4 8 . 9 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 8 4 8 . 4 4 7 . 6 4 8 . 9 5 0 . 3 5 2 . 1 5 2 . 7 5 1 . 1 4 9 . 1 4 5 . 1 4 0 . 8 3 7 . 8 3 4 . 8 3 1 . 7 2 9 . 2 26.623.4 MP 6 4 7 . 8 4 5 . 3 MP 6 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 56 . 7 5 1 . 4 5 0 . 5 5 0 . 9 5 1 . 3 53 . 8 5 7 . 6 5 1 . 7 4 6 . 6 4 5 . 1 4 5 . 1 4 6 . 4 4 8 . 4 4 3 . 6 4 3 . 2 4 1 . 0 3 8 . 2 3 8 . 0 3 6 . 3 3 5 . 4 3 1 . 1 2 8 . 5 2 6 . 9 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 5 2 6 . 1 3 4 . 4 28.619.6 No o n Ti m e Pe r i o d 12 : 0 0 PM to 2: 0 0 PM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 61 . 4 4 0 . 1 MP 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 7 5 3 . 8 5 3 . 8 6 0 . 0 5 9 . 8 5 5 . 2 5 3 . 8 5 4 . 0 5 5 . 1 5 4 . 0 5 1 . 0 4 9 . 5 5 5 . 8 4 9 . 4 4 9 . 2 53 . 5 47 . 1 4 6 . 2 4 5 . 1 4 0 . 4 3 7 . 4 3 3 . 3 3 1 . 0 2 8 . 8 2 7 . 0 2 6 . 2 2 5 . 1 2 3 . 8 2 2 . 6 MP 2 56 . 9 4 6 . 6 MP 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 64 . 1 7 0 . 4 6 7 . 7 7 2 . 7 6 9 . 0 6 4 . 6 6 4 . 9 6 2 . 0 6 4 . 9 6 5 . 6 5 8 . 7 5 7 . 6 6 5 . 8 5 8 . 5 5 9 . 4 5 8 . 8 5 4 . 3 5 3 . 6 5 1 . 8 4 9 . 6 4 8 . 4 4 7 . 5 4 6 . 1 4 2 . 9 3 9 . 7 3 4 . 2 2 8 . 9 2 4 . 9 2 1 . 2 MP 3 49 . 8 4 7 . 2 MP 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 58 . 8 5 8 . 3 5 6 . 8 5 9 . 2 5 6 . 8 5 5 . 0 5 3 . 4 5 0 . 9 5 1 . 1 5 5 . 6 4 5 . 2 4 2 . 9 4 7 . 5 4 0 . 2 4 1 . 2 4 3 . 9 4 1 . 2 4 2 . 7 4 1 . 5 3 8 . 4 3 6 . 3 3 3 . 3 2 9 . 2 2 5 . 0 2 1 . 5 1 9 . 7 1 9 . 0 1 8 . 4 1 8 . 2 MP 4 63 . 7 6 2 . 7 MP 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 8 5 6 . 3 5 5 . 2 5 6 . 4 5 6 . 5 5 3 . 0 5 4 . 7 5 6 . 1 5 2 . 9 5 4 . 2 5 1 . 2 5 1 . 5 5 2 . 0 4 9 . 7 4 8 . 7 4 8 . 7 4 8 . 2 4 7 . 7 4 8 . 0 4 6 . 8 4 4 . 4 4 4 . 5 4 3 . 9 4 1 . 8 4 0 . 3 3 7 . 5 3 5 . 6 3 7 . 8 3 3 . 8 MP 5 55 . 4 5 1 . 7 MP 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 57 . 5 6 0 . 8 5 6 . 4 5 8 . 0 5 7 . 9 6 2 . 8 6 4 . 2 5 1 . 2 5 4 . 6 5 2 . 1 5 2 . 9 5 2 . 9 5 3 . 3 5 1 . 9 5 0 . 6 5 0 . 8 5 1 . 3 5 3 . 2 5 4 . 9 5 3 . 2 5 1 . 0 4 8 . 3 4 6 . 6 4 4 . 7 4 0 . 9 3 9 . 2 3 7 . 6 3 3 . 8 3 1 . 4 Leq = Av e r a g e so u n d le v e l . L90 = So u n d le v e l ex c e e d 90 % of th e me a s u r e m e n t pe r i o d . No t e : Th e no i s e me a s u r e m e n t s pr e s e n t e d in th e ta b l e re p r e s e n t s al l no i s e so u r c e s re c o r d e d at ea c h lo c a t i o n , an d do e s no t is o l a t e no i s e ge n e r a t e d ex c l u s i v e l y by th e fa c i l i t y 17 8 Le h i g h So u t h w e s t Ce m e n t Co . Ap p e n d i x C Fa r ‐Fi e l d Me a s u r e m e n t Da t a Se p t e m b e r 8 an d 9, 20 1 5 Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 To n a l L i m i t s 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 88 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Ev e n i n g Ti m e Pe r i o d 7: 0 0 PM to 9: 0 0 PM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t F r e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 45 . 7 4 2 . 2 MP 1 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 46 . 2 4 8 . 3 4 9 . 9 5 0 . 6 4 9 . 7 4 6 . 8 4 7 . 7 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 2 4 9 . 2 4 2 . 5 4 2 . 1 4 1 . 9 4 0 . 8 4 0 . 7 4 0 . 9 3 7 . 8 3 6 . 0 3 4 . 7 3 0 . 1 2 7 . 8 2 5 . 2 2 9 . 3 2 8 . 7 3 1 . 6 2 5 . 1 2 1 . 5 1 7 . 4 1 4 . 6 MP 2 58 . 9 5 8 . 3 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 64 . 2 7 0 . 8 6 7 . 2 7 3 . 2 6 3 . 8 6 1 . 1 6 0 . 2 5 9 . 1 6 4 . 2 6 2 . 2 5 6 . 2 5 5 . 7 5 5 . 1 5 5 . 5 5 5 . 4 5 1 . 6 5 0 . 2 4 9 . 4 4 7 . 5 4 6 . 2 4 4 . 3 4 3 . 7 4 2 . 0 3 7 . 5 3 3 . 8 2 7 . 2 1 8 . 0 1 5 . 8 1 5 . 5 MP 3 44 . 8 4 2 . 6 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 54 . 4 5 4 . 5 5 4 . 4 5 5 . 9 5 5 . 5 5 1 . 4 5 1 . 3 5 3 . 6 5 7 . 5 5 4 . 9 4 3 . 8 4 1 . 2 3 6 . 0 3 4 . 4 3 5 . 4 3 4 . 4 3 2 . 4 3 1 . 4 3 0 . 1 2 6 . 4 2 2 . 9 1 9 . 2 1 8 . 1 3 0 . 0 33.314.215.414.012.4 MP 4 52 . 3 5 0 . 0 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 52 . 0 5 1 . 5 4 9 . 8 4 9 . 4 4 8 . 0 5 1 . 6 5 0 . 2 4 8 . 3 5 1 . 8 5 1 . 9 4 9 . 2 4 7 . 5 4 5 . 0 4 3 . 1 4 1 . 9 4 0 . 6 3 9 . 9 3 8 . 9 3 8 . 3 3 7 . 0 3 4 . 7 3 3 . 3 3 6 . 5 47.742.027.126.626.729.7 MP 5 55 . 9 4 1 . 5 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 48 . 5 4 8 . 6 4 9 . 5 4 8 . 0 4 8 . 9 4 7 . 9 4 7 . 5 4 7 . 6 4 5 . 7 4 4 . 6 4 7 . 4 4 6 . 1 4 7 . 0 4 5 . 2 4 4 . 5 4 5 . 3 4 5 . 9 4 8 . 3 5 0 . 0 4 8 . 2 4 5 . 9 4 1 . 5 3 7 . 2 3 4 . 6 3 7 . 0 2 9 . 6 2 5 . 2 2 1 . 3 1 8 . 3 MP 6 39 . 9 3 1 . 2 MP 6 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 40 . 9 4 0 . 3 4 1 . 3 4 0 . 0 3 9 . 8 4 1 . 2 4 1 . 9 4 4 . 0 4 1 . 3 3 7 . 3 3 7 . 7 3 4 . 8 3 4 . 6 3 5 . 2 3 5 . 8 3 5 . 0 3 3 . 1 3 0 . 5 2 8 . 6 2 7 . 8 2 4 . 7 2 4 . 6 2 4 . 0 2 2 . 1 1 8 . 9 1 7 . 2 1 4 . 9 1 3 . 8 1 2 . 5 Mi d n i g h t Ti m e Pe r i o d 12 : 0 0 AM to 2: 0 0 AM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t F r e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 48 . 3 4 7 . 4 MP 1 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 3 5 2 . 5 5 0 . 4 5 2 . 4 5 0 . 9 4 5 . 3 5 1 . 2 4 8 . 4 5 0 . 6 5 2 . 4 4 2 . 4 4 1 . 1 4 6 . 9 4 2 . 6 4 3 . 4 3 9 . 9 3 7 . 4 3 6 . 6 3 5 . 0 3 0 . 7 2 8 . 0 2 6 . 1 36.041.527.719.320.415.513.5 MP 2 60 . 4 6 0 . 0 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 64 . 1 7 0 . 4 6 5 . 9 7 3 . 9 6 5 . 5 6 2 . 9 6 0 . 8 5 8 . 4 6 2 . 8 6 4 . 5 5 4 . 0 5 7 . 6 5 9 . 8 5 7 . 3 5 6 . 5 5 2 . 9 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 5 4 8 . 5 4 8 . 0 4 6 . 3 4 6 . 7 44.140.535.329.522.520.217.2 MP 3 45 . 9 4 2 . 1 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 54 . 5 5 5 . 7 5 3 . 2 5 5 . 2 5 0 . 1 5 0 . 3 5 1 . 6 4 9 . 2 5 1 . 0 5 7 . 8 4 5 . 7 4 3 . 8 4 3 . 8 4 3 . 1 4 0 . 3 3 7 . 6 3 4 . 2 3 1 . 0 2 8 . 5 2 3 . 9 1 9 . 4 1 6 . 6 17.429.429.218.213.111.910.5 MP 4 48 . 4 4 7 . 0 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 54 . 2 5 6 . 6 5 5 . 1 5 4 . 5 5 2 . 4 5 2 . 4 4 9 . 2 4 7 . 1 4 8 . 4 4 8 . 8 4 5 . 0 4 2 . 4 4 3 . 5 4 3 . 4 4 3 . 1 4 0 . 5 3 7 . 8 3 5 . 4 3 4 . 8 3 2 . 7 3 2 . 1 2 8 . 7 36.541.632.622.522.722.923.5 MP 5 36 . 3 3 4 . 2 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 9 4 5 . 5 4 5 . 6 4 6 . 1 4 6 . 0 4 4 . 6 4 3 . 8 4 0 . 8 3 8 . 8 3 7 . 8 3 7 . 4 3 3 . 0 2 8 . 2 2 6 . 8 2 6 . 4 2 7 . 7 2 7 . 5 2 7 . 1 2 5 . 7 2 2 . 8 2 0 . 7 2 0 . 9 27.721.817.616.514.713.412.5 MP 6 54 . 3 5 3 . 0 MP 6 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 40 . 9 4 0 . 1 3 8 . 7 3 9 . 0 3 8 . 8 3 8 . 3 3 8 . 2 3 6 . 1 3 2 . 9 3 6 . 7 3 0 . 9 2 6 . 0 2 7 . 4 2 4 . 8 2 2 . 9 1 9 . 5 1 8 . 4 1 7 . 9 1 8 . 2 1 8 . 3 1 8 . 1 1 7 . 5 35.248.551.129.824.924.718.5 Mo r n i n g Ti m e Pe r i o d 6: 0 0 AM to 8: 0 0 AM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t F r e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 47 . 6 4 5 . 8 MP 1 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 56 . 4 5 2 . 3 5 3 . 7 5 4 . 3 5 0 . 6 4 8 . 2 4 9 . 4 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 5 2 . 3 4 3 . 7 4 2 . 2 4 6 . 8 4 1 . 2 4 3 . 9 4 2 . 8 3 9 . 4 3 8 . 5 3 7 . 3 3 2 . 6 3 0 . 6 2 6 . 6 2 5 . 4 2 5 . 9 2 2 . 9 2 0 . 4 2 1 . 7 1 6 . 6 1 5 . 3 MP 2 62 . 0 6 1 . 3 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 65 . 8 7 0 . 0 6 7 . 5 7 2 . 7 6 5 . 7 6 3 . 8 6 3 . 4 6 0 . 4 6 2 . 4 6 2 . 9 5 6 . 0 5 8 . 4 6 5 . 2 5 7 . 3 5 8 . 3 5 3 . 6 5 2 . 5 5 1 . 6 4 9 . 7 4 9 . 2 4 5 . 2 4 3 . 4 4 2 . 0 3 7 . 7 3 4 . 0 2 7 . 3 2 2 . 1 1 7 . 1 1 4 . 0 MP 3 48 . 1 4 6 . 9 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 58 . 2 5 8 . 2 5 5 . 5 5 8 . 2 5 4 . 8 5 5 . 0 5 5 . 9 5 3 . 8 5 2 . 3 5 8 . 1 4 8 . 2 4 4 . 4 4 3 . 1 4 0 . 9 4 1 . 4 4 2 . 3 4 1 . 4 3 9 . 9 3 6 . 3 3 0 . 2 2 6 . 2 2 2 . 4 2 0 . 1 1 8 . 7 1 6 . 2 1 3 . 7 1 2 . 3 1 2 . 2 1 1 . 5 MP 4 55 . 4 4 4 . 7 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 1 5 4 . 2 5 1 . 1 5 2 . 8 5 3 . 2 5 3 . 7 5 7 . 9 5 5 . 3 5 3 . 0 5 4 . 8 4 8 . 9 4 8 . 7 5 0 . 1 4 8 . 9 4 7 . 7 4 8 . 3 4 7 . 2 4 7 . 1 4 6 . 5 4 4 . 9 4 3 . 1 4 1 . 0 4 0 . 6 3 9 . 4 3 6 . 1 3 3 . 4 3 5 . 3 3 3 . 7 2 7 . 8 MP 5 59 . 3 4 5 . 8 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 51 . 2 5 1 . 4 5 1 . 8 5 3 . 8 5 3 . 3 5 3 . 4 5 3 . 4 5 3 . 0 4 9 . 5 4 9 . 7 4 8 . 2 4 9 . 4 5 0 . 4 4 9 . 3 4 8 . 7 4 9 . 2 5 0 . 6 5 3 . 1 5 3 . 3 5 1 . 1 4 8 . 2 4 4 . 0 4 0 . 0 3 6 . 6 3 3 . 0 2 8 . 8 2 5 . 3 2 2 . 3 1 8 . 7 MP 6 38 . 6 3 5 . 5 MP 6 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 45 . 1 4 3 . 7 4 3 . 5 4 4 . 9 4 5 . 4 4 6 . 0 4 7 . 0 4 5 . 8 4 3 . 5 4 2 . 8 3 9 . 9 4 0 . 2 3 6 . 9 3 5 . 4 3 3 . 6 3 2 . 4 2 9 . 9 2 7 . 8 2 5 . 5 2 2 . 1 1 8 . 1 1 6 . 4 1 4 . 9 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 7 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 7 9 . 8 No o n Ti m e Pe r i o d 12 : 0 0 PM to 2: 0 0 PM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t F r e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 1 47 . 9 4 4 . 3 MP 1 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 58 . 5 5 5 . 8 5 3 . 4 5 4 . 4 5 4 . 6 5 2 . 6 5 1 . 2 5 1 . 2 5 8 . 2 5 2 . 2 4 6 . 4 4 6 . 0 4 4 . 6 4 3 . 8 4 2 . 6 4 1 . 4 3 9 . 6 3 9 . 0 3 6 . 1 3 2 . 8 3 0 . 9 2 8 . 7 2 6 . 3 2 4 . 5 2 5 . 7 2 4 . 1 2 1 . 4 2 1 . 0 1 6 . 0 MP 2 60 . 0 5 8 . 1 MP 2 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 62 . 2 6 7 . 7 6 4 . 1 7 4 . 3 6 6 . 2 6 5 . 7 6 4 . 3 6 2 . 1 6 6 . 5 6 4 . 3 5 9 . 7 5 7 . 9 5 5 . 1 5 5 . 4 5 5 . 1 5 2 . 3 5 0 . 8 5 1 . 0 4 8 . 4 4 7 . 8 4 6 . 1 4 5 . 0 4 4 . 6 4 0 . 8 3 7 . 5 3 4 . 8 3 2 . 2 2 9 . 1 2 6 . 7 MP 3 51 . 5 4 9 . 4 MP 3 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 67 . 9 6 6 . 4 6 5 . 0 6 3 . 1 6 0 . 3 6 9 . 1 5 7 . 9 5 6 . 2 6 4 . 8 6 0 . 7 5 2 . 1 5 0 . 5 4 5 . 4 4 3 . 7 4 1 . 4 4 3 . 5 3 9 . 8 3 8 . 4 3 9 . 2 3 6 . 3 3 3 . 1 3 0 . 2 2 7 . 2 2 5 . 0 2 2 . 1 1 9 . 5 1 7 . 9 1 7 . 5 1 8 . 7 MP 4 54 . 3 4 1 . 7 MP 4 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 53 . 7 5 3 . 7 5 5 . 3 5 7 . 2 5 5 . 3 5 7 . 9 5 7 . 7 5 2 . 3 5 3 . 9 5 1 . 4 4 8 . 3 5 0 . 3 4 7 . 8 4 7 . 0 4 6 . 8 4 7 . 5 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 1 4 5 . 7 4 3 . 7 4 1 . 6 4 0 . 0 3 8 . 6 3 6 . 6 3 3 . 9 3 2 . 4 3 1 . 0 2 8 . 3 2 7 . 1 MP 5 59 . 8 3 7 . 9 MP 5 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 8 5 3 . 9 5 2 . 3 5 1 . 5 5 1 . 3 5 0 . 5 5 6 . 8 5 4 . 1 4 8 . 8 4 9 . 6 4 9 . 2 5 2 . 1 5 1 . 7 4 8 . 5 4 8 . 7 4 9 . 7 5 0 . 3 5 2 . 6 5 4 . 3 5 2 . 2 4 8 . 9 4 4 . 3 4 0 . 1 3 6 . 3 3 2 . 7 2 8 . 8 2 4 . 8 2 1 . 4 1 8 . 2 MP 6 41 . 7 3 8 . 7 MP 6 O v e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 7 4 2 . 7 4 2 . 7 4 3 . 2 4 3 . 8 4 3 . 7 4 4 . 8 4 2 . 9 4 2 . 0 4 1 . 2 4 0 . 3 3 9 . 7 3 8 . 8 3 7 . 9 3 6 . 7 3 5 . 1 3 3 . 7 3 2 . 8 3 2 . 5 2 9 . 9 2 6 . 6 2 3 . 6 2 1 . 3 2 0 . 2 1 8 . 1 1 7 . 1 1 8 . 3 1 8 . 6 1 3 . 9 Leq = Av e r a g e so u n d le v e l . L90 = So u n d le v e l ex c e e d 90 % of th e me a s u r e m e n t pe r i o d . No t e : Th e no i s e me a s u r e m e n t s pr e s e n t e d in th e ta b l e re p r e s e n t s al l no i s e so u r c e s re c o r d e d at ea c h lo c a t i o n , an d do e s no t is o l a t e no i s e ge n e r a t e d ex c l u s i v e l y by th e fa c i l i t y 17 9 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix C ‐ Comparative Data Near‐Field Measurement Data Measurement Point File Name May 7 Overall Leq (dBA)Sept 9 Overall Leq (dBA)Overall Reduction (dBA) NF1 020 89.6 86.8 ‐2.9 NF2 021 89.8 86.2 ‐3.6 NF3 022 88.9 87.6 ‐1.3 NF4 023 90.4 87.3 ‐3.1 NF5 024 88.3 86.4 ‐1.9 NF6 025 87.1 84.7 ‐2.4 NF7 026 85.4 85.3 0.0 NF8 027 87.4 89.0 1.5 NF9 028 91.2 87.6 ‐3.7 NF10 029 91.5 90.2 ‐1.3 NF11 030 93.0 91.1 ‐1.8 NF12 031 91.4 88.9 ‐2.5 NF13 017 73.4 72.5 ‐0.9 NF14 018 79.1 83.7 4.6 NF15 019 87.7 87.2 ‐0.5 NF16 020 83.2 84.9 1.7 NF17 021 79.9 77.1 ‐2.8 NF18 022 75.3 74.3 ‐1.0 NF19 023 78.2 74.5 ‐3.7 NF20 024 76.5 74.7 ‐1.7 NF21 025 76.9 75.5 ‐1.4 NF22 026 78.4 77.1 ‐1.3 NF23 027 79.4 76.2 ‐3.2 NF24 028 78.4 73.5 ‐5.0 NF25 029 77.6 74.9 ‐2.7 NF26 031 81.8 75.7 ‐6.1 NF27 032 83.4 76.5 ‐6.9 NF28 033 78.4 81.1 2.7 NF29 034 85.1 78.8 ‐6.3 NF30 035 85.3 77.4 ‐7.9 NF31 036 78.9 74.2 ‐4.7 NF32 037 73.9 72.0 ‐1.9 NF33 038 70.6 68.3 ‐2.2 NF34 039 70.2 69.2 ‐1.0 NF35 040 71.5 71.2 ‐0.3 Leq = Average sound level. L90 = Sound level exceed 90% of the measurement period. Note: The noise measurements presented in the table represents all noise sources recorded at each location, and does not isolate noise generated exclusively by the facility 180 Le h i g h So u t h w e s t Ce m e n t Co . Ap p e n d i x C Ne a r ‐Fi e l d Me a s u r e m e n t Da t a Ma y 7, 20 1 5 Me a s u r e m e n t P o i n t Fi l e N a m e Ov e r a l l L e q Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 5 . 0 3 1 . 5 4 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 6 3 . 0 8 0 . 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 NF 1 01 7 89 . 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 82 . 3 9 0 . 6 8 5 . 0 8 7 . 4 8 6 . 5 8 4 . 0 7 9 . 2 7 8 . 4 8 1 . 1 9 3 . 4 8 8 . 9 7 9 . 7 8 9 . 9 8 0 . 6 8 0 . 9 8 5 . 7 7 8 . 1 7 8 . 2 7 7 . 8 7 7 . 3 7 2 . 5 7 7 . 3 7 6 . 5 7 4 . 8 7 2 . 4 7 1 . 6 6 4 . 7 5 9 . 5 5 5 . 9 NF 2 01 8 89 . 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 4 8 8 . 9 9 0 . 0 8 6 . 8 8 5 . 0 8 3 . 6 8 0 . 1 7 8 . 6 7 9 . 9 8 7 . 9 8 6 . 5 8 1 . 1 9 1 . 6 8 1 . 4 8 2 . 5 8 4 . 1 7 8 . 1 7 7 . 7 8 0 . 5 7 7 . 1 7 3 . 8 7 6 . 2 7 6 . 7 7 6 . 7 7 3 . 1 7 3 . 2 6 5 . 9 6 0 . 2 5 5 . 7 NF 3 01 9 88 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 6 8 7 . 6 8 8 . 5 8 6 . 8 8 8 . 1 8 4 . 8 7 9 . 2 8 0 . 3 7 9 . 6 8 3 . 5 8 6 . 3 8 0 . 9 8 7 . 4 8 2 . 1 8 3 . 0 8 5 . 4 7 8 . 8 7 8 . 7 7 7 . 9 7 6 . 3 7 4 . 1 7 5 . 1 7 7 . 4 7 1 . 0 6 9 . 1 6 8 . 2 6 2 . 9 6 0 . 4 5 7 . 2 NF 4 02 0 90 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 1 8 5 . 8 9 0 . 8 8 9 . 8 8 7 . 9 8 5 . 4 8 1 . 0 8 1 . 8 8 0 . 7 8 4 . 7 8 4 . 7 8 2 . 2 9 0 . 7 8 2 . 2 8 3 . 4 8 8 . 9 7 9 . 8 8 2 . 6 7 8 . 1 7 5 . 6 7 3 . 6 7 3 . 7 7 3 . 4 6 9 . 9 6 7 . 3 6 5 . 9 6 1 . 5 5 8 . 4 5 6 . 0 NF 5 02 1 88 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 78 . 3 8 6 . 7 8 9 . 2 8 8 . 0 8 5 . 3 8 1 . 8 8 0 . 8 8 0 . 7 7 8 . 7 8 7 . 2 8 3 . 2 7 9 . 6 8 6 . 3 8 1 . 7 8 1 . 4 8 7 . 1 7 9 . 6 7 8 . 5 7 6 . 6 7 3 . 8 7 2 . 2 7 2 . 1 7 2 . 0 6 8 . 9 6 6 . 7 6 4 . 7 6 0 . 6 5 8 . 4 5 5 . 4 NF 6 02 2 87 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 76 . 2 8 0 . 3 8 5 . 9 8 4 . 4 8 1 . 3 7 8 . 1 7 5 . 4 7 8 . 5 7 7 . 1 8 2 . 3 8 1 . 5 7 9 . 0 9 0 . 8 8 0 . 0 8 0 . 3 8 4 . 8 7 6 . 7 7 6 . 1 7 4 . 5 7 2 . 0 6 8 . 6 6 8 . 6 6 8 . 0 6 5 . 1 6 2 . 8 6 1 . 0 5 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 4 9 . 1 NF 7 02 3 85 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 78 . 0 7 9 . 3 8 1 . 8 8 3 . 8 8 0 . 3 7 8 . 7 7 8 . 9 8 2 . 0 7 8 . 3 8 0 . 3 8 2 . 2 8 1 . 1 8 6 . 2 7 9 . 9 8 1 . 0 8 1 . 4 7 6 . 4 7 6 . 6 7 3 . 1 7 1 . 4 6 8 . 4 6 8 . 4 6 8 . 5 6 4 . 5 6 1 . 8 6 0 . 5 5 6 . 9 5 4 . 4 5 2 . 0 NF 8 02 4 87 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 1 8 4 . 6 8 6 . 4 9 1 . 0 8 4 . 6 8 3 . 5 8 2 . 4 8 1 . 8 8 0 . 5 8 4 . 1 8 2 . 7 8 1 . 3 8 5 . 1 8 1 . 6 8 1 . 9 8 4 . 6 7 9 . 1 7 8 . 5 7 6 . 3 7 4 . 2 7 2 . 1 7 2 . 5 7 2 . 2 6 8 . 6 6 6 . 0 6 3 . 3 5 9 . 8 5 7 . 4 5 4 . 3 NF 9 02 5 91 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 4 8 6 . 5 9 1 . 0 9 3 . 8 8 6 . 3 8 9 . 3 8 3 . 4 8 5 . 3 8 4 . 2 8 7 . 8 8 8 . 4 8 3 . 7 8 8 . 3 8 2 . 8 8 3 . 1 9 0 . 5 8 1 . 0 8 1 . 6 7 9 . 9 7 6 . 4 7 5 . 1 7 5 . 2 7 5 . 0 7 3 . 2 7 2 . 7 7 0 . 2 6 7 . 5 6 6 . 8 6 4 . 3 NF 1 0 02 6 91 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 4 8 7 . 9 8 8 . 3 9 2 . 3 8 6 . 5 8 7 . 8 8 2 . 5 8 5 . 4 8 5 . 4 8 8 . 2 8 7 . 9 8 6 . 7 9 2 . 7 8 2 . 2 8 3 . 0 8 8 . 6 8 1 . 9 8 0 . 5 8 0 . 1 7 9 . 0 7 6 . 4 7 7 . 1 7 6 . 4 7 5 . 5 7 3 . 1 7 0 . 1 6 6 . 9 6 5 . 4 6 2 . 5 NF 1 1 02 7 93 . 0 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 1 8 8 . 4 8 8 . 8 9 0 . 0 8 7 . 8 8 8 . 5 8 3 . 6 8 3 . 9 8 7 . 5 9 1 . 3 8 7 . 2 8 2 . 7 9 0 . 4 8 2 . 0 8 1 . 7 8 6 . 9 8 2 . 6 8 1 . 4 8 1 . 9 8 0 . 6 8 0 . 6 8 0 . 5 8 0 . 8 8 0 . 6 8 2 . 3 7 6 . 2 7 3 . 6 7 2 . 0 6 9 . 3 NF 1 2 02 8 91 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 7 8 9 . 8 8 4 . 8 8 4 . 6 8 7 . 1 8 5 . 3 8 2 . 4 8 3 . 1 8 2 . 7 8 6 . 1 8 7 . 0 8 2 . 1 9 3 . 0 8 1 . 3 8 1 . 6 8 7 . 3 7 9 . 0 7 8 . 4 7 9 . 7 7 8 . 9 7 5 . 7 8 0 . 6 7 9 . 8 7 6 . 4 7 5 . 0 7 4 . 2 6 7 . 2 6 3 . 8 6 1 . 0 NF 1 3 02 9 73 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 71 . 3 7 4 . 4 6 8 . 9 7 3 . 8 7 2 . 1 6 8 . 8 7 1 . 2 7 0 . 3 7 0 . 4 7 6 . 8 7 2 . 8 7 0 . 9 7 3 . 0 6 6 . 1 6 7 . 5 6 6 . 5 6 4 . 2 6 4 . 0 6 2 . 5 6 2 . 1 6 0 . 8 5 9 . 3 5 6 . 9 5 4 . 8 5 1 . 6 4 8 . 1 4 5 . 6 4 2 . 0 3 8 . 1 NF 1 4 03 0 79 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 70 . 9 8 5 . 4 7 7 . 6 7 5 . 5 7 5 . 0 7 4 . 4 7 3 . 5 7 3 . 4 7 5 . 4 8 0 . 3 7 8 . 5 7 5 . 9 7 4 . 8 7 1 . 9 7 7 . 5 7 3 . 1 7 0 . 4 6 9 . 6 6 7 . 9 6 6 . 2 6 4 . 5 6 3 . 3 6 0 . 5 5 7 . 7 5 5 . 0 5 1 . 2 4 7 . 6 4 4 . 1 3 8 . 3 NF 1 5 03 1 87 . 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 75 . 4 8 9 . 9 7 8 . 1 7 7 . 5 7 9 . 1 7 9 . 6 8 0 . 3 8 0 . 9 7 8 . 0 8 3 . 4 8 4 . 5 8 3 . 2 8 2 . 3 7 9 . 6 8 6 . 5 8 0 . 0 7 8 . 7 7 8 . 9 7 7 . 4 7 6 . 3 7 4 . 1 7 2 . 6 6 9 . 9 6 7 . 8 6 5 . 2 6 2 . 1 5 9 . 2 5 6 . 7 5 2 . 4 NF 1 6 03 2 83 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 7 7 8 . 0 7 6 . 2 7 6 . 7 7 9 . 6 7 9 . 6 8 0 . 0 7 7 . 2 7 6 . 3 9 0 . 5 8 8 . 5 7 8 . 7 7 8 . 6 7 7 . 4 7 8 . 7 7 5 . 3 7 4 . 4 7 2 . 5 7 1 . 2 6 9 . 4 6 7 . 6 6 9 . 4 6 5 . 5 6 1 . 5 5 9 . 4 5 6 . 1 5 2 . 9 5 0 . 4 4 6 . 0 NF 1 7 03 3 79 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 1 7 7 . 6 7 6 . 9 7 5 . 9 7 8 . 8 7 6 . 5 7 7 . 6 7 6 . 1 7 5 . 9 8 3 . 4 7 9 . 3 7 6 . 4 7 5 . 4 7 1 . 8 7 4 . 1 7 2 . 7 7 2 . 2 7 0 . 5 6 8 . 9 6 7 . 5 6 6 . 5 6 7 . 2 6 5 . 1 6 3 . 9 6 3 . 1 6 1 . 2 6 0 . 8 5 9 . 1 5 5 . 8 NF 1 8 03 4 75 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 71 . 0 7 7 . 4 7 5 . 4 7 6 . 5 7 6 . 3 7 5 . 0 7 4 . 4 7 2 . 0 7 3 . 5 7 7 . 6 7 3 . 4 7 4 . 0 7 5 . 7 7 0 . 2 7 0 . 4 6 7 . 6 6 5 . 4 6 4 . 8 6 4 . 1 6 3 . 0 6 1 . 4 6 1 . 5 5 9 . 3 5 6 . 8 5 6 . 3 5 1 . 9 4 7 . 5 4 4 . 8 3 8 . 4 NF 1 9 03 5 78 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 71 . 6 7 2 . 6 7 5 . 6 7 7 . 7 7 6 . 6 7 4 . 3 7 3 . 8 7 1 . 9 7 6 . 3 7 8 . 2 7 2 . 5 7 2 . 5 8 4 . 8 7 0 . 3 6 9 . 6 6 7 . 5 6 5 . 8 6 4 . 9 6 4 . 1 6 2 . 1 6 0 . 4 6 0 . 1 5 8 . 6 5 6 . 2 5 5 . 3 5 0 . 8 4 6 . 2 4 2 . 7 3 6 . 9 NF 2 0 03 6 76 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 73 . 2 7 3 . 3 7 6 . 2 8 0 . 6 7 8 . 1 7 4 . 8 7 5 . 4 7 2 . 9 7 7 . 5 8 0 . 0 7 2 . 8 7 3 . 2 7 8 . 4 7 1 . 9 7 0 . 5 6 9 . 1 6 6 . 6 6 5 . 9 6 5 . 0 6 3 . 4 6 1 . 9 6 1 . 9 6 1 . 2 5 7 . 4 5 5 . 8 5 2 . 6 4 9 . 4 4 6 . 5 4 2 . 3 NF 2 1 03 7 76 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 4 7 6 . 8 7 5 . 7 7 8 . 8 7 7 . 2 7 9 . 9 7 7 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 6 . 2 7 5 . 8 7 2 . 6 7 5 . 3 7 8 . 8 7 2 . 0 7 0 . 9 7 0 . 4 6 7 . 4 6 6 . 1 6 6 . 0 6 3 . 8 6 1 . 8 6 2 . 4 6 2 . 3 5 7 . 5 5 5 . 1 5 1 . 1 4 6 . 9 4 4 . 5 3 9 . 3 NF 2 2 03 8 78 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 72 . 3 7 7 . 4 7 5 . 5 7 9 . 0 7 7 . 9 7 7 . 3 7 6 . 1 7 4 . 0 7 2 . 8 7 6 . 3 7 4 . 2 7 4 . 7 7 7 . 4 7 3 . 3 7 2 . 5 7 2 . 9 6 6 . 9 6 6 . 5 6 9 . 5 6 5 . 9 6 3 . 2 6 3 . 4 6 4 . 5 6 3 . 3 6 2 . 2 6 0 . 8 5 9 . 0 5 8 . 2 5 4 . 1 NF 2 3 03 9 79 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 72 . 9 7 5 . 4 7 7 . 3 7 4 . 7 7 6 . 3 7 3 . 8 7 4 . 7 7 3 . 2 7 0 . 6 7 3 . 9 7 2 . 5 7 1 . 1 8 6 . 7 7 2 . 2 7 0 . 7 6 9 . 2 6 5 . 1 6 4 . 1 6 4 . 7 6 3 . 4 6 0 . 5 6 0 . 0 5 9 . 1 5 5 . 3 5 3 . 5 5 1 . 2 4 8 . 3 4 5 . 9 4 2 . 8 NF 2 4 04 0 78 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 72 . 9 7 4 . 6 7 6 . 7 7 8 . 4 7 4 . 8 7 1 . 5 6 9 . 8 6 8 . 8 7 1 . 0 7 1 . 3 7 0 . 3 7 0 . 3 8 5 . 2 7 2 . 9 7 1 . 0 6 8 . 7 6 4 . 0 6 5 . 6 6 4 . 1 6 3 . 3 6 0 . 8 5 9 . 0 5 7 . 7 5 4 . 3 5 1 . 8 4 9 . 5 4 5 . 6 4 2 . 9 3 7 . 8 NF 2 5 04 1 77 . 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 72 . 4 7 7 . 7 8 0 . 7 7 8 . 4 7 6 . 4 7 2 . 2 7 1 . 2 7 0 . 8 7 0 . 9 7 1 . 0 7 4 . 2 7 0 . 5 7 6 . 4 7 4 . 0 7 3 . 4 7 3 . 8 6 7 . 5 6 6 . 2 6 6 . 2 6 6 . 5 6 1 . 9 6 4 . 4 6 3 . 2 5 7 . 8 5 5 . 8 5 4 . 0 4 9 . 3 4 6 . 2 4 2 . 9 NF 2 6 04 2 81 . 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 9 8 1 . 9 8 1 . 1 8 2 . 1 7 6 . 8 7 3 . 0 7 0 . 8 7 2 . 1 7 1 . 1 7 2 . 6 7 3 . 1 7 1 . 1 8 4 . 3 7 3 . 6 7 3 . 2 7 4 . 4 6 8 . 3 6 7 . 2 6 6 . 7 6 6 . 7 6 3 . 7 7 3 . 9 7 3 . 3 6 1 . 1 6 2 . 8 6 2 . 8 5 8 . 9 5 4 . 2 5 2 . 2 NF 2 7 04 3 83 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 78 . 6 8 2 . 6 8 2 . 6 8 0 . 6 7 9 . 1 7 3 . 0 7 2 . 8 7 1 . 4 7 1 . 2 7 7 . 0 7 6 . 5 7 3 . 1 8 5 . 5 7 2 . 9 7 1 . 5 7 3 . 0 6 8 . 1 6 8 . 4 6 7 . 8 6 7 . 6 6 5 . 2 7 6 . 1 7 6 . 4 6 3 . 6 6 5 . 5 6 6 . 0 6 0 . 4 5 7 . 5 5 5 . 0 NF 2 8 04 4 78 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 77 . 8 7 9 . 5 7 5 . 8 7 7 . 5 7 5 . 0 7 3 . 2 7 3 . 4 7 2 . 2 7 1 . 1 7 1 . 8 7 5 . 2 7 7 . 9 7 9 . 1 7 1 . 9 7 1 . 0 7 1 . 7 6 7 . 4 6 7 . 9 6 6 . 5 6 5 . 2 6 2 . 7 6 7 . 7 6 7 . 8 5 8 . 3 5 8 . 4 5 7 . 4 5 4 . 4 5 3 . 8 5 2 . 2 NF 2 9 04 5 85 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 1 8 3 . 2 8 3 . 3 8 0 . 8 7 9 . 1 7 4 . 9 7 2 . 4 6 9 . 7 7 0 . 6 7 9 . 6 8 1 . 9 7 4 . 5 8 4 . 8 7 2 . 3 7 1 . 0 7 2 . 6 6 8 . 2 6 7 . 6 6 8 . 2 6 8 . 7 6 5 . 7 7 8 . 2 7 9 . 5 6 5 . 1 6 7 . 7 6 8 . 7 6 2 . 0 5 8 . 4 5 4 . 3 NF 3 0 04 6 85 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 81 . 5 8 3 . 1 7 7 . 9 7 9 . 7 7 8 . 9 7 4 . 2 7 3 . 0 7 0 . 6 7 0 . 8 7 6 . 0 7 8 . 3 7 4 . 7 7 7 . 6 7 1 . 0 7 2 . 4 7 1 . 1 6 9 . 0 7 0 . 3 6 9 . 8 6 8 . 4 6 6 . 6 7 9 . 0 7 9 . 2 6 8 . 3 6 9 . 9 7 0 . 1 6 8 . 9 6 9 . 8 7 0 . 4 NF 3 1 04 7 78 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 75 . 9 7 6 . 8 7 4 . 5 7 6 . 2 7 7 . 3 7 6 . 0 7 1 . 8 7 2 . 7 7 1 . 1 7 2 . 8 8 4 . 2 8 3 . 3 7 2 . 8 6 9 . 2 7 0 . 7 6 9 . 0 6 5 . 0 6 3 . 4 6 2 . 8 6 2 . 4 5 9 . 2 7 0 . 6 6 9 . 0 5 6 . 8 6 0 . 6 5 9 . 0 5 4 . 6 5 3 . 3 5 1 . 2 NF 3 2 04 8 73 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 78 . 1 7 7 . 7 7 3 . 8 7 4 . 1 8 3 . 0 7 7 . 0 7 0 . 4 6 9 . 4 6 9 . 8 7 9 . 0 7 5 . 4 7 2 . 3 7 2 . 9 6 6 . 2 6 9 . 2 6 5 . 2 6 5 . 7 6 3 . 0 6 1 . 3 6 1 . 3 6 0 . 5 5 9 . 5 5 9 . 2 5 5 . 0 5 3 . 0 5 1 . 0 4 7 . 3 4 5 . 8 4 7 . 8 NF 3 3 04 9 70 . 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 72 . 9 7 1 . 7 6 9 . 6 7 4 . 0 7 9 . 1 7 2 . 9 7 0 . 0 6 7 . 6 7 0 . 4 7 1 . 0 7 2 . 7 6 8 . 2 7 2 . 9 6 4 . 7 6 5 . 0 6 3 . 0 6 0 . 8 5 9 . 4 5 7 . 7 5 8 . 2 5 5 . 9 5 4 . 7 5 4 . 0 5 0 . 8 4 8 . 7 4 6 . 5 4 2 . 6 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 6 NF 3 4 05 0 70 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 67 . 5 70 . 8 68 . 0 70 . 2 7 3 . 3 6 8 . 3 6 6 . 2 6 5 . 2 6 7 . 0 7 0 . 0 7 2 . 7 6 7 . 2 6 8 . 3 6 2 . 7 6 4 . 0 6 2 . 5 6 1 . 9 6 1 . 4 5 9 . 1 5 9 . 2 5 7 . 8 5 5 . 8 5 4 . 9 5 2 . 3 4 8 . 5 4 4 . 5 3 9 . 4 3 4 . 3 3 2 . 0 NF 3 5 05 1 71 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 70 . 0 7 1 . 7 6 7 . 9 7 2 . 5 7 3 . 6 6 8 . 9 6 8 . 2 6 7 . 7 6 7 . 6 7 2 . 3 7 2 . 5 6 9 . 8 6 9 . 3 6 4 . 8 6 6 . 2 6 3 . 5 6 3 . 1 6 3 . 4 6 0 . 1 6 0 . 2 5 9 . 2 5 7 . 1 5 5 . 6 5 2 . 6 4 8 . 8 4 4 . 6 4 0 . 2 3 5 . 0 2 9 . 0 Leq = Av e r a g e so u n d le v e l . L90 = So u n d le v e l ex c e e d 90 % of th e me a s u r e m e n t pe r i o d . No t e : Th e no i s e me a s u r e m e n t s pr e s e n t e d in th e ta b l e re p r e s e n t s al l no i s e so u r c e s re c o r d e d at ea c h lo c a t i o n , an d do e s no t is o l a t e no i s e ge n e r a t e d ex c l u s i v e l y by th e fa c i l i t y 18 1 Le h i g h So u t h w e s t Ce m e n t Co . Ap p e n d i x C Ne a r ‐Fi e l d Me a s u r e m e n t Da t a Se p t e m b e r 9, 20 1 5 Me a s u r e m e n t P o i n t F i l e N a m e Ov e r a l l L eq Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 5 . 0 3 1 . 5 4 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 6 3 . 0 8 0 . 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 NF 1 02 0 86 . 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 84 . 8 8 1 . 4 9 0 . 7 8 5 . 6 8 7 . 8 8 1 . 0 7 7 . 7 7 6 . 3 7 8 . 4 9 3 . 1 8 3 . 5 7 6 . 1 8 3 . 4 7 8 . 2 8 4 . 3 7 8 . 4 7 9 . 0 7 5 . 2 7 4 . 6 7 6 . 2 7 1 . 7 7 2 . 1 7 1 . 4 6 9 . 7 6 7 . 2 6 5 . 0 6 3 . 0 5 5 . 8 5 1 . 7 NF 2 02 1 86 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 81 . 0 8 0 . 6 8 9 . 8 8 4 . 3 8 4 . 6 8 1 . 1 7 6 . 6 7 4 . 9 7 8 . 9 9 2 . 8 8 1 . 6 7 5 . 9 8 2 . 4 7 8 . 3 8 1 . 9 7 8 . 1 7 7 . 2 7 7 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 6 . 4 7 1 . 1 7 1 . 4 7 1 . 3 7 0 . 5 6 7 . 1 6 4 . 4 6 0 . 6 5 5 . 6 5 1 . 0 NF 3 02 2 87 . 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 80 . 6 8 5 . 2 8 8 . 0 8 1 . 1 8 4 . 1 7 9 . 4 7 5 . 3 7 4 . 5 7 8 . 8 9 5 . 3 8 3 . 8 7 6 . 4 8 8 . 4 7 9 . 4 8 4 . 1 8 1 . 3 7 8 . 1 7 6 . 2 7 4 . 9 7 4 . 2 7 0 . 8 7 0 . 9 6 9 . 9 6 7 . 1 6 6 . 2 6 2 . 6 5 8 . 0 5 4 . 3 5 0 . 1 NF 4 02 3 87 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 6 8 2 . 8 8 8 . 2 8 4 . 1 8 3 . 4 8 0 . 9 7 7 . 8 7 7 . 8 7 8 . 3 9 1 . 7 8 1 . 6 7 8 . 0 8 7 . 4 7 9 . 0 8 5 . 6 8 0 . 3 7 8 . 5 7 8 . 7 7 5 . 0 7 3 . 8 7 1 . 0 6 9 . 8 6 8 . 0 6 6 . 5 6 3 . 7 6 0 . 7 5 7 . 5 5 4 . 7 5 1 . 6 NF 5 02 4 86 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 78 . 8 8 0 . 8 9 0 . 0 8 4 . 2 8 2 . 5 7 9 . 7 7 8 . 2 7 8 . 3 7 8 . 4 9 3 . 5 8 0 . 6 7 5 . 7 8 4 . 8 7 9 . 0 8 5 . 2 8 0 . 2 7 7 . 5 7 6 . 3 7 4 . 0 7 1 . 6 6 8 . 8 6 8 . 2 6 6 . 1 6 4 . 6 6 1 . 9 5 9 . 0 5 5 . 6 5 3 . 3 4 9 . 2 NF 6 02 5 84 . 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 77 . 2 7 6 . 4 8 2 . 1 8 2 . 7 7 9 . 3 7 7 . 0 7 5 . 6 7 6 . 5 7 5 . 7 8 6 . 8 7 8 . 1 7 5 . 7 8 0 . 7 7 8 . 8 8 3 . 0 7 8 . 0 7 7 . 5 7 6 . 5 7 4 . 0 7 1 . 7 6 9 . 3 6 7 . 6 6 7 . 1 6 3 . 1 6 1 . 2 5 8 . 5 5 5 . 0 5 2 . 8 4 9 . 0 NF 7 02 6 85 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 78 . 6 7 6 . 1 7 9 . 0 8 0 . 2 7 8 . 8 7 6 . 3 7 8 . 2 7 6 . 7 7 7 . 8 8 2 . 8 7 9 . 1 7 9 . 2 8 6 . 7 7 7 . 5 8 4 . 9 7 9 . 2 7 7 . 0 7 4 . 3 7 1 . 8 6 9 . 6 6 7 . 1 6 6 . 7 6 5 . 9 6 4 . 4 6 3 . 6 6 1 . 3 6 0 . 1 5 8 . 3 5 5 . 3 NF 8 02 7 89 . 0 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 8 8 0 . 8 8 5 . 1 8 5 . 8 8 3 . 0 8 2 . 1 8 1 . 0 8 0 . 8 8 0 . 9 8 8 . 2 8 2 . 7 8 0 . 5 9 0 . 4 7 9 . 3 8 9 . 3 8 1 . 8 7 9 . 3 7 7 . 8 7 5 . 1 7 4 . 3 7 1 . 3 7 0 . 8 6 9 . 6 6 6 . 8 6 5 . 3 6 1 . 4 5 8 . 0 5 5 . 6 5 1 . 6 NF 9 02 8 87 . 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 82 . 6 8 3 . 9 8 7 . 4 8 8 . 4 8 3 . 6 8 3 . 4 8 1 . 7 8 2 . 9 8 3 . 4 8 8 . 8 8 5 . 4 8 1 . 8 8 3 . 0 8 0 . 2 8 5 . 9 8 0 . 9 7 9 . 7 7 7 . 7 7 6 . 8 7 5 . 0 7 3 . 2 7 3 . 2 7 0 . 8 6 9 . 0 6 8 . 3 6 4 . 3 6 1 . 1 5 8 . 7 5 4 . 9 NF 1 0 02 9 90 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 84 . 0 8 2 . 7 8 5 . 6 8 7 . 4 8 3 . 9 8 5 . 8 8 2 . 4 8 4 . 4 8 4 . 4 9 1 . 9 8 5 . 9 8 5 . 2 9 1 . 7 8 0 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 3 . 7 8 1 . 7 8 0 . 5 7 9 . 3 7 8 . 7 7 5 . 5 7 5 . 4 7 4 . 2 7 2 . 8 7 2 . 4 6 8 . 0 6 5 . 4 6 3 . 6 6 0 . 4 NF 1 1 03 0 91 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 83 . 1 8 4 . 8 8 6 . 2 8 8 . 4 8 5 . 1 8 7 . 2 8 4 . 9 8 2 . 9 8 5 . 0 8 9 . 5 8 4 . 6 8 0 . 7 8 7 . 7 8 0 . 7 8 2 . 8 8 5 . 5 8 1 . 2 8 0 . 2 7 9 . 8 7 9 . 7 8 1 . 3 7 9 . 2 7 8 . 0 7 7 . 3 7 7 . 7 7 1 . 8 6 8 . 4 6 6 . 0 6 3 . 5 NF 1 2 03 1 88 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 83 . 8 8 1 . 8 8 3 . 7 8 5 . 3 8 3 . 6 8 3 . 6 8 0 . 7 8 2 . 6 8 4 . 2 9 4 . 7 8 2 . 6 7 8 . 7 8 3 . 4 8 0 . 1 8 3 . 6 8 1 . 4 7 9 . 3 7 7 . 7 7 6 . 4 8 0 . 6 7 4 . 8 7 7 . 6 7 4 . 9 7 1 . 9 7 2 . 0 6 8 . 5 6 7 . 3 5 9 . 9 5 6 . 9 NF 1 3 01 7 72 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 73 . 2 7 2 . 2 7 1 . 2 7 0 . 9 7 2 . 6 7 1 . 3 7 4 . 5 7 4 . 8 6 8 . 5 7 0 . 4 6 7 . 7 6 7 . 8 6 5 . 1 6 4 . 8 6 3 . 8 6 2 . 1 6 0 . 6 5 8 . 3 5 6 . 5 5 3 . 8 5 0 . 5 4 6 . 6 4 1 . 8 3 5 . 6 2 9 . 8 2 7 . 4 2 5 . 1 2 0 . 9 1 7 . 8 NF 1 4 01 8 83 . 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 81 . 0 7 9 . 0 7 2 . 2 7 3 . 8 8 0 . 1 7 8 . 8 8 5 . 4 7 8 . 8 7 7 . 6 7 4 . 3 7 8 . 5 7 9 . 2 7 8 . 4 7 5 . 4 7 5 . 7 7 4 . 5 7 3 . 0 7 0 . 5 6 8 . 5 6 6 . 0 6 3 . 0 6 1 . 5 5 6 . 9 5 2 . 3 4 5 . 6 3 8 . 8 3 1 . 4 2 4 . 1 1 7 . 3 NF 1 5 01 9 87 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 77 . 4 8 0 . 6 7 9 . 0 7 9 . 6 7 7 . 4 7 8 . 9 8 6 . 0 8 8 . 8 8 7 . 5 7 8 . 4 8 0 . 6 8 0 . 8 8 0 . 0 8 0 . 4 7 8 . 0 7 7 . 8 7 6 . 3 7 4 . 4 7 2 . 5 6 9 . 7 6 7 . 1 6 4 . 4 6 1 . 1 5 7 . 2 5 3 . 3 4 8 . 7 4 3 . 9 4 0 . 5 3 6 . 3 NF 1 6 02 0 84 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 75 . 8 7 6 . 9 7 6 . 8 7 6 . 9 7 8 . 4 7 6 . 8 8 3 . 0 8 2 . 1 7 9 . 7 8 0 . 6 8 0 . 3 8 0 . 6 7 7 . 7 7 7 . 9 7 6 . 9 7 4 . 9 7 3 . 9 7 1 . 7 6 9 . 8 6 7 . 2 6 4 . 8 6 1 . 8 5 7 . 8 5 3 . 7 4 9 . 6 4 5 . 3 4 0 . 6 3 6 . 6 3 2 . 4 NF 1 7 02 1 77 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 77 . 6 7 8 . 0 7 6 . 9 7 6 . 6 7 7 . 4 7 5 . 8 7 9 . 2 7 6 . 1 7 4 . 1 7 2 . 4 7 1 . 7 7 3 . 0 7 1 . 0 7 0 . 7 6 8 . 3 6 6 . 6 6 4 . 8 6 2 . 3 6 0 . 3 5 8 . 5 5 6 . 1 5 4 . 4 4 9 . 6 4 2 . 9 3 6 . 9 2 9 . 9 2 3 . 2 2 5 . 9 1 4 . 9 NF 1 8 02 2 74 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 76 . 1 7 5 . 5 7 4 . 6 7 3 . 2 7 4 . 4 7 3 . 5 7 6 . 8 7 2 . 1 7 0 . 7 7 0 . 4 6 8 . 6 6 9 . 4 6 6 . 7 6 5 . 3 6 5 . 1 6 3 . 7 6 2 . 9 6 0 . 2 6 0 . 7 5 9 . 1 5 9 . 4 5 8 . 8 5 3 . 3 4 3 . 8 3 6 . 4 2 7 . 6 1 5 . 6 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 7 NF 1 9 02 3 74 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 2 7 3 . 4 7 5 . 9 7 2 . 9 7 1 . 4 7 5 . 1 7 7 . 5 7 2 . 3 7 4 . 6 7 1 . 5 6 9 . 8 7 0 . 1 6 5 . 3 6 5 . 4 6 4 . 7 6 3 . 5 6 4 . 8 5 9 . 6 5 9 . 2 5 7 . 3 5 5 . 2 5 5 . 1 4 8 . 8 3 9 . 7 3 2 . 8 2 3 . 0 1 3 . 9 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 8 NF 2 0 02 4 74 . 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 4 7 7 . 3 7 6 . 5 7 2 . 3 7 4 . 1 7 6 . 9 7 8 . 1 7 2 . 2 7 2 . 9 7 3 . 5 7 0 . 3 7 0 . 7 6 8 . 4 6 6 . 3 6 4 . 5 6 3 . 7 6 1 . 7 5 9 . 5 5 9 . 2 5 6 . 7 5 4 . 1 5 2 . 1 4 6 . 0 3 9 . 0 3 3 . 3 2 5 . 0 1 9 . 0 1 5 . 2 1 2 . 9 NF 2 1 02 5 75 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 9 7 7 . 7 7 4 . 9 7 5 . 3 7 4 . 6 7 6 . 5 7 7 . 9 7 0 . 1 7 1 . 6 7 6 . 5 7 0 . 7 7 1 . 8 6 8 . 3 6 6 . 8 6 5 . 1 6 4 . 3 6 2 . 7 6 0 . 2 5 9 . 5 5 7 . 6 5 4 . 2 5 2 . 0 4 6 . 1 4 2 . 7 3 9 . 6 3 4 . 8 2 7 . 5 2 0 . 5 1 4 . 9 NF 2 2 02 6 77 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 3 7 5 . 5 7 5 . 8 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 6 7 5 . 2 7 9 . 2 7 2 . 1 7 2 . 7 7 3 . 4 7 1 . 0 7 8 . 4 6 9 . 4 6 6 . 1 6 4 . 8 6 4 . 5 6 2 . 7 6 0 . 2 5 9 . 7 5 8 . 0 5 5 . 1 5 3 . 1 4 8 . 3 4 4 . 8 4 0 . 7 3 4 . 6 3 0 . 3 2 4 . 9 1 8 . 6 NF 2 3 02 7 76 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 9 7 2 . 1 6 9 . 7 7 0 . 0 6 8 . 7 7 0 . 6 7 8 . 6 7 0 . 0 6 9 . 2 7 7 . 8 7 0 . 6 7 6 . 7 6 6 . 2 6 3 . 7 6 3 . 5 6 2 . 7 6 2 . 0 5 8 . 8 5 7 . 4 5 6 . 0 5 6 . 1 5 0 . 9 4 7 . 9 4 7 . 1 4 5 . 3 3 6 . 2 2 7 . 1 2 0 . 2 1 3 . 9 NF 2 4 02 8 73 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 75 . 4 7 3 . 2 6 9 . 2 6 8 . 0 6 7 . 5 6 9 . 5 7 7 . 5 6 6 . 5 6 7 . 2 7 5 . 2 6 9 . 7 7 0 . 7 6 5 . 5 6 4 . 1 6 1 . 8 6 1 . 7 6 0 . 3 5 7 . 9 5 5 . 9 5 3 . 8 5 1 . 4 4 8 . 5 4 3 . 7 3 8 . 8 3 2 . 6 2 5 . 8 1 9 . 7 1 3 . 5 1 1 . 9 NF 2 5 02 9 74 . 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 74 . 6 7 2 . 7 6 8 . 8 6 9 . 0 6 8 . 7 6 7 . 6 7 6 . 9 7 0 . 1 6 8 . 3 7 2 . 9 7 1 . 2 7 3 . 9 6 7 . 6 6 4 . 9 6 5 . 4 6 3 . 8 6 3 . 4 5 9 . 3 5 7 . 5 5 5 . 2 5 2 . 4 4 9 . 9 4 4 . 9 4 0 . 3 3 4 . 9 3 1 . 0 2 5 . 1 1 8 . 5 1 3 . 1 NF 2 6 03 1 75 . 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 79 . 7 7 6 . 0 7 2 . 1 7 1 . 2 6 7 . 2 6 8 . 8 7 7 . 4 7 0 . 3 6 9 . 2 7 2 . 5 7 1 . 0 7 3 . 4 6 8 . 4 6 7 . 4 6 5 . 6 6 5 . 6 6 4 . 1 6 0 . 7 6 2 . 1 6 0 . 1 5 4 . 1 5 3 . 0 4 9 . 8 4 5 . 1 4 0 . 1 3 5 . 9 3 0 . 7 2 6 . 4 2 1 . 5 NF 2 7 03 2 76 . 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 81 . 5 7 4 . 7 7 1 . 2 6 8 . 7 6 7 . 1 6 9 . 5 7 8 . 5 7 4 . 9 7 3 . 3 7 8 . 6 7 0 . 2 7 2 . 0 6 7 . 9 6 7 . 0 6 7 . 0 6 3 . 7 6 2 . 7 6 0 . 9 6 3 . 0 6 2 . 3 5 5 . 7 5 4 . 5 5 1 . 4 4 8 . 2 4 3 . 6 3 9 . 3 3 5 . 7 3 2 . 5 3 0 . 1 NF 2 8 03 3 81 . 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 81 . 2 7 8 . 5 7 4 . 8 7 3 . 4 6 9 . 0 7 1 . 8 8 9 . 2 8 3 . 3 7 1 . 8 8 2 . 7 7 3 . 0 7 5 . 9 7 0 . 9 7 0 . 5 6 9 . 9 6 6 . 6 6 7 . 2 6 4 . 3 6 6 . 9 6 7 . 4 5 9 . 7 5 8 . 4 5 6 . 3 5 3 . 5 4 9 . 4 4 5 . 5 4 1 . 6 3 8 . 6 3 6 . 5 NF 2 9 03 4 78 . 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 81 . 7 7 7 . 1 7 3 . 5 7 4 . 3 6 9 . 0 7 2 . 3 8 0 . 0 7 5 . 3 7 2 . 4 7 3 . 9 7 2 . 1 7 3 . 3 7 1 . 0 7 2 . 3 7 0 . 7 6 5 . 6 6 5 . 2 6 4 . 6 6 6 . 0 6 5 . 7 6 2 . 6 6 3 . 1 6 1 . 3 5 9 . 7 5 9 . 2 5 8 . 1 5 3 . 3 4 8 . 5 4 5 . 1 NF 3 0 03 5 77 . 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 77 . 9 7 4 . 1 7 2 . 7 7 1 . 0 6 7 . 8 7 2 . 5 7 9 . 3 7 6 . 3 8 0 . 6 7 4 . 2 7 2 . 7 7 7 . 4 6 6 . 2 6 5 . 3 6 3 . 9 6 2 . 5 6 1 . 3 5 9 . 7 6 1 . 5 6 3 . 9 5 6 . 6 5 5 . 7 5 3 . 4 5 0 . 8 4 7 . 8 4 4 . 6 4 1 . 9 3 8 . 3 3 4 . 5 NF 3 1 03 6 74 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 75 . 3 7 1 . 5 6 8 . 3 7 1 . 1 6 8 . 1 7 1 . 0 8 0 . 2 7 4 . 5 7 9 . 3 7 0 . 8 6 7 . 7 7 2 . 4 6 3 . 3 6 2 . 7 6 2 . 2 5 9 . 6 5 8 . 3 5 6 . 3 5 6 . 5 5 5 . 2 5 2 . 6 5 3 . 6 4 9 . 0 4 5 . 9 4 2 . 5 3 9 . 5 3 3 . 9 2 7 . 8 2 1 . 2 NF 3 2 03 7 72 . 0 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 72 . 1 7 0 . 2 7 4 . 7 6 8 . 3 6 8 . 3 6 9 . 9 7 2 . 3 7 0 . 2 7 3 . 7 6 9 . 4 6 6 . 4 6 5 . 9 6 5 . 0 6 4 . 1 6 1 . 9 6 0 . 3 5 9 . 4 5 9 . 2 5 8 . 0 5 7 . 1 5 3 . 2 5 0 . 5 4 7 . 8 4 4 . 7 4 0 . 1 3 6 . 4 3 1 . 7 2 9 . 8 2 3 . 3 NF 3 3 03 8 68 . 3 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 70 . 5 6 8 . 1 6 8 . 7 6 6 . 1 6 3 . 9 6 4 . 6 7 0 . 1 6 8 . 3 6 4 . 8 6 6 . 8 6 3 . 5 6 4 . 9 6 0 . 0 5 9 . 9 5 8 . 6 5 6 . 9 5 6 . 4 5 5 . 1 5 3 . 7 5 2 . 1 5 0 . 1 4 7 . 0 4 1 . 9 3 7 . 4 2 8 . 1 2 1 . 2 1 5 . 2 1 1 . 4 1 0 . 5 NF 3 4 03 9 69 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 69 . 3 6 7 . 8 6 8 . 0 67 . 3 6 8 . 0 6 8 . 2 7 3 . 8 7 3 . 7 6 7 . 3 6 5 . 2 6 2 . 6 6 3 . 9 6 3 . 0 6 2 . 2 5 8 . 7 5 7 . 1 5 7 . 1 5 4 . 6 5 2 . 7 5 0 . 2 4 6 . 9 4 2 . 4 3 5 . 9 2 9 . 3 1 8 . 6 1 1 . 5 9 . 6 9 . 9 1 0 . 5 NF 3 5 0 4 0 7 1 . 2 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 75 . 9 7 2 . 1 6 9 . 9 7 0 . 6 6 9 . 6 7 1 . 9 7 6 . 9 7 7 . 8 6 9 . 2 6 6 . 7 6 4 . 8 6 5 . 3 6 4 . 8 6 1 . 5 6 0 . 9 5 9 . 5 5 8 . 0 5 5 . 9 5 4 . 1 5 0 . 4 4 7 . 3 4 3 . 8 3 8 . 6 3 1 . 8 2 3 . 5 1 4 . 8 1 0 . 3 9 . 9 1 0 . 7 Leq = Av e r a g e so u n d le v e l . L90 = So u n d le v e l ex c e e d 90 % of th e me a s u r e m e n t pe r i o d . No t e : Th e no i s e me a s u r e m e n t s pr e s e n t e d in th e ta b l e re p r e s e n t s al l no i s e so u r c e s re c o r d e d at ea c h lo c a t i o n , an d do e s no t is o l a t e no i s e ge n e r a t e d ex c l u s i v e l y by th e fa c i l i t y 18 2 APPENDIX D - COMPLIANCE MEASUREMENT DATA 183 Le h i g h So u t h w e s t Ap p e n d i x D Co m p l i a n c e Me a s u r e m e n t Da t a Se p t e m b e r 8 an d 9, 20 1 5 Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 To n a l L i m i t s 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 88 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Ev e n i n g Ti m e Pe r i o d 7: 0 0 PM to 9: 0 0 PM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 5 55 . 9 4 1 . 5 MP 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 48 . 5 4 8 . 6 4 9 . 5 4 8 . 0 4 8 . 9 4 7 . 9 4 7 . 5 4 7 . 6 4 5 . 7 4 4 . 6 4 7 . 4 4 6 . 1 4 7 . 0 4 5 . 2 4 4 . 5 4 5 . 3 4 5 . 9 4 8 . 3 5 0 . 0 4 8 . 2 4 5 . 9 4 1 . 5 3 7 . 2 3 4 . 6 3 7 . 0 2 9 . 6 2 5 . 2 2 1 . 3 1 8 . 3 MP 7 51 . 0 4 9 . 0 MP 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 51 . 9 5 3 . 8 5 2 . 1 5 2 . 2 5 1 . 7 5 1 . 0 4 9 . 4 4 7 . 8 4 7 . 3 4 6 . 6 4 4 . 8 4 2 . 3 4 2 . 6 4 3 . 0 4 3 . 9 4 5 . 1 4 5 . 2 4 4 . 7 4 3 . 3 4 0 . 0 3 7 . 0 3 2 . 1 3 1 . 9 2 8 . 6 2 4 . 2 2 2 . 0 2 1 . 4 2 0 . 8 1 8 . 2 MP 8 51 . 5 4 9 . 4 MP 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 49 . 7 4 9 . 4 5 2 . 5 5 0 . 7 5 1 . 9 5 3 . 2 5 2 . 2 4 9 . 3 5 0 . 8 4 8 . 5 4 4 . 7 4 2 . 8 4 6 . 3 4 5 . 3 4 4 . 9 4 4 . 6 4 4 . 3 4 4 . 1 4 4 . 4 4 2 . 6 3 7 . 5 3 1 . 2 2 7 . 0 2 4 . 5 2 1 . 5 1 9 . 3 1 8 . 2 1 6 . 9 1 5 . 5 MP 9 50 . 5 4 7 . 7 MP 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 46 . 3 5 3 . 3 5 3 . 2 4 9 . 4 4 7 . 9 5 0 . 2 4 9 . 2 4 7 . 7 4 5 . 9 4 6 . 1 4 4 . 1 4 3 . 0 4 2 . 2 4 3 . 0 4 4 . 1 4 4 . 8 4 3 . 2 4 3 . 7 4 3 . 4 4 0 . 9 3 6 . 0 3 1 . 1 2 9 . 1 2 9 . 8 2 3 . 1 1 9 . 7 1 7 . 9 1 6 . 4 1 4 . 8 MP 1 1 50 . 7 4 4 . 2 MP 1 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 47 . 9 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 4 4 7 . 3 4 7 . 5 5 0 . 5 4 7 . 5 4 5 . 4 4 4 . 9 4 9 . 5 4 4 . 2 4 6 . 7 4 3 . 7 4 1 . 0 4 0 . 4 4 1 . 1 4 1 . 4 4 4 . 4 4 2 . 0 4 0 . 3 3 8 . 1 3 5 . 3 3 7 . 6 3 9 . 6 2 9 . 9 3 1 . 7 2 9 . 5 2 5 . 0 2 3 . 4 MP 1 4 39 . 2 3 3 . 1 MP 1 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 43 . 5 4 4 . 0 4 4 . 8 4 5 . 1 4 3 . 1 4 4 . 8 4 3 . 1 4 2 . 3 3 9 . 7 3 8 . 6 3 6 . 8 3 3 . 5 3 4 . 2 3 4 . 8 3 6 . 2 3 4 . 5 3 2 . 1 3 0 . 4 2 8 . 5 2 5 . 3 2 1 . 8 2 0 . 2 1 9 . 5 2 2 . 1 1 4 . 7 1 3 . 1 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 4 1 0 . 6 MP 1 5 46 . 0 4 0 . 2 MP 1 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 43 . 8 4 4 . 7 4 5 . 4 4 2 . 3 4 1 . 2 4 2 . 3 4 0 . 7 4 0 . 3 3 9 . 8 4 0 . 5 3 9 . 2 3 5 . 6 3 7 . 6 3 7 . 4 3 8 . 4 3 7 . 6 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 9 2 7 . 0 2 2 . 7 2 0 . 5 2 0 . 2 2 7 . 0 4 2 . 3 3 5 . 7 1 9 . 7 1 8 . 0 1 4 . 9 1 4 . 9 MP 1 6 47 . 4 4 2 . 2 MP 1 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 0 4 5 . 9 4 8 . 1 5 2 . 6 4 7 . 1 5 3 . 3 4 8 . 2 5 0 . 2 4 7 . 6 4 7 . 2 4 8 . 7 4 3 . 7 4 2 . 6 4 1 . 1 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 3 3 8 . 9 3 7 . 6 3 6 . 8 3 5 . 6 3 3 . 4 3 2 . 2 3 5 . 3 3 5 . 2 2 5 . 7 2 2 . 8 2 0 . 9 2 0 . 1 1 9 . 5 Mi d n i g h t Ti m e Pe r i o d 12 : 0 0 AM to 2: 0 0 AM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 5 36 . 3 3 4 . 2 MP 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 9 4 5 . 5 4 5 . 6 4 6 . 1 4 6 . 0 4 4 . 6 4 3 . 8 4 0 . 8 3 8 . 8 3 7 . 8 3 7 . 4 3 3 . 0 2 8 . 2 2 6 . 8 2 6 . 4 2 7 . 7 2 7 . 5 2 7 . 1 2 5 . 7 2 2 . 8 2 0 . 7 2 0 . 9 2 7 . 7 2 1 . 8 1 7 . 6 1 6 . 5 1 4 . 7 1 3 . 4 1 2 . 5 MP 7 49 . 2 4 8 . 2 MP 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 46 . 1 4 6 . 7 4 7 . 6 4 5 . 9 4 8 . 6 4 5 . 0 4 2 . 5 4 1 . 8 4 2 . 5 4 2 . 6 4 0 . 0 3 7 . 4 3 8 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 8 . 5 3 8 . 9 3 8 . 0 3 6 . 8 3 5 . 0 3 2 . 3 2 8 . 9 3 9 . 4 4 5 . 2 3 2 . 8 1 8 . 9 1 9 . 0 1 7 . 5 1 6 . 2 1 4 . 6 MP 8 48 . 1 4 6 . 8 MP 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 0 4 2 . 3 4 1 . 5 4 1 . 1 4 0 . 0 4 1 . 8 4 2 . 9 4 1 . 7 3 8 . 1 3 8 . 7 3 4 . 5 3 2 . 5 3 5 . 1 3 6 . 8 3 5 . 4 3 5 . 7 3 5 . 4 3 5 . 3 3 6 . 0 3 4 . 0 2 9 . 6 2 6 . 4 4 5 . 1 3 1 . 3 1 7 . 1 1 8 . 3 1 5 . 1 1 3 . 7 1 2 . 4 MP 9 40 . 2 3 6 . 6 MP 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 39 . 6 3 9 . 3 3 7 . 7 3 9 . 0 3 9 . 3 3 8 . 5 3 7 . 3 3 8 . 3 3 8 . 4 4 1 . 2 3 0 . 4 3 1 . 8 3 5 . 2 3 9 . 1 3 8 . 2 3 1 . 5 2 8 . 0 2 8 . 2 2 7 . 4 2 4 . 0 1 9 . 7 2 4 . 1 3 1 . 9 2 1 . 2 1 5 . 0 1 5 . 4 1 4 . 5 1 2 . 9 1 1 . 9 MP 1 1 42 . 0 4 0 . 2 MP 1 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 4 4 5 . 9 4 1 . 4 4 2 . 2 4 0 . 4 4 0 . 3 4 0 . 4 3 7 . 2 3 4 . 1 3 4 . 4 3 1 . 5 3 0 . 9 3 1 . 9 3 2 . 0 3 2 . 2 3 2 . 8 3 2 . 2 3 2 . 1 3 1 . 1 2 7 . 2 2 3 . 0 2 2 . 2 3 6 . 4 3 2 . 6 1 9 . 3 2 0 . 1 1 9 . 7 1 8 . 3 1 7 . 5 MP 1 4 45 . 8 4 5 . 5 MP 1 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 2 4 1 . 5 4 0 . 0 4 1 . 0 3 9 . 1 3 8 . 7 3 7 . 8 3 5 . 9 3 5 . 3 3 9 . 6 3 0 . 8 2 7 . 5 3 3 . 6 2 6 . 5 2 3 . 8 2 5 . 1 2 0 . 1 1 9 . 6 2 0 . 1 1 9 . 8 1 9 . 1 1 8 . 7 3 1 . 3 4 4 . 1 2 2 . 1 1 2 . 8 1 4 . 3 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 2 MP 1 5 50 . 8 5 0 . 5 MP 1 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 44 . 8 4 4 . 0 4 3 . 4 4 4 . 1 4 3 . 2 4 3 . 1 4 1 . 6 3 9 . 7 3 9 . 4 4 2 . 5 3 8 . 9 3 3 . 7 3 2 . 5 2 9 . 6 2 5 . 6 2 0 . 7 1 8 . 4 1 6 . 8 1 7 . 2 1 7 . 3 2 2 . 0 1 7 . 1 3 8 . 0 4 9 . 1 3 1 . 8 1 6 . 0 2 1 . 2 1 3 . 6 1 3 . 6 MP 1 6 40 . 3 3 9 . 0 MP 1 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 36 . 8 4 1 . 6 3 8 . 1 4 0 . 6 4 0 . 4 4 0 . 2 4 1 . 7 3 8 . 8 3 8 . 4 4 1 . 8 3 4 . 0 3 3 . 0 3 1 . 4 3 2 . 4 3 6 . 4 3 2 . 6 3 0 . 2 2 7 . 5 2 7 . 6 2 5 . 2 2 1 . 5 2 2 . 7 3 5 . 1 1 9 . 0 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 1 9 . 7 1 0 . 5 9 . 8 Mo r n i n g Ti m e Pe r i o d 6: 0 0 AM to 8: 0 0 AM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 5 59 . 3 4 5 . 8 MP 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 51 . 2 5 1 . 4 5 1 . 8 5 3 . 8 5 3 . 3 5 3 . 4 5 3 . 4 5 3 . 0 4 9 . 5 4 9 . 7 4 8 . 2 4 9 . 4 5 0 . 4 4 9 . 3 4 8 . 7 4 9 . 2 5 0 . 6 5 3 . 1 5 3 . 3 5 1 . 1 4 8 . 2 4 4 . 0 4 0 . 0 3 6 . 6 3 3 . 0 2 8 . 8 2 5 . 3 2 2 . 3 1 8 . 7 MP 7 55 . 6 5 3 . 5 MP 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 1 5 4 . 2 5 4 . 6 5 4 . 7 5 4 . 3 5 5 . 2 5 4 . 0 5 3 . 0 5 2 . 2 5 3 . 7 5 0 . 7 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 7 5 0 . 1 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 4 9 . 1 4 7 . 6 4 7 . 1 4 4 . 8 4 1 . 1 3 6 . 0 3 6 . 6 3 1 . 2 3 1 . 4 2 6 . 5 2 6 . 2 2 0 . 8 1 9 . 4 MP 8 56 . 8 5 4 . 9 MP 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 50 . 5 4 9 . 8 5 0 . 3 5 0 . 6 5 0 . 7 5 1 . 7 5 3 . 1 5 4 . 6 5 3 . 2 5 3 . 3 4 7 . 3 4 9 . 1 4 9 . 9 4 9 . 6 5 0 . 9 5 0 . 5 4 9 . 2 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 1 4 7 . 1 4 2 . 7 3 7 . 5 3 0 . 5 2 8 . 1 2 4 . 3 2 1 . 9 2 0 . 3 1 6 . 3 1 4 . 8 MP 9 51 . 1 4 9 . 0 MP 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 49 . 2 4 9 . 0 5 0 . 7 5 1 . 1 5 1 . 0 4 9 . 8 4 9 . 1 5 0 . 0 4 9 . 6 4 8 . 1 4 3 . 5 4 3 . 2 4 4 . 1 4 5 . 3 4 5 . 0 4 4 . 1 4 4 . 4 4 4 . 8 4 3 . 8 4 0 . 4 3 6 . 4 3 2 . 7 2 7 . 9 2 4 . 1 2 0 . 8 1 8 . 8 1 6 . 3 1 5 . 3 1 3 . 8 MP 1 1 58 . 7 4 3 . 8 MP 1 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 54 . 0 5 4 . 0 5 2 . 7 5 3 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 1 . 7 5 2 . 2 5 3 . 5 5 3 . 1 5 4 . 3 4 9 . 8 5 1 . 5 5 1 . 6 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 0 4 9 . 4 4 9 . 7 5 1 . 7 5 1 . 8 4 9 . 9 4 8 . 0 4 4 . 4 4 1 . 1 3 8 . 8 3 6 . 9 3 6 . 1 3 3 . 2 3 0 . 1 2 7 . 2 MP 1 4 44 . 1 3 9 . 7 MP 1 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 53 . 5 4 5 . 2 4 6 . 7 4 7 . 9 4 8 . 9 5 2 . 0 5 0 . 4 4 8 . 0 4 5 . 3 4 5 . 8 4 2 . 4 4 0 . 4 4 2 . 5 4 1 . 2 4 0 . 3 4 1 . 0 3 7 . 2 3 4 . 1 2 9 . 7 2 5 . 7 2 1 . 2 1 8 . 6 1 6 . 9 1 5 . 6 1 4 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 6 1 0 . 2 MP 1 5 45 . 8 4 0 . 8 MP 1 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 52 . 2 4 8 . 4 4 9 . 5 5 0 . 8 5 1 . 2 5 2 . 3 5 1 . 7 4 9 . 4 4 5 . 8 4 5 . 6 4 4 . 0 4 3 . 7 4 1 . 9 3 9 . 5 3 8 . 0 3 8 . 8 3 7 . 0 3 5 . 9 3 4 . 9 3 5 . 3 3 3 . 7 3 2 . 1 3 1 . 1 2 7 . 6 2 6 . 6 2 3 . 5 2 5 . 0 2 1 . 9 1 8 . 6 MP 1 6 45 . 6 4 0 . 7 MP 1 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 45 . 7 4 5 . 0 4 6 . 1 4 8 . 2 4 8 . 6 4 8 . 9 4 9 . 6 4 7 . 0 4 6 . 0 4 4 . 0 4 2 . 5 3 9 . 9 3 9 . 9 3 8 . 9 3 8 . 4 3 7 . 9 3 6 . 2 3 5 . 1 3 4 . 8 3 5 . 0 3 7 . 4 3 2 . 8 2 7 . 6 2 9 . 3 3 0 . 3 2 5 . 1 2 2 . 8 1 8 . 1 1 5 . 6 No o n Ti m e Pe r i o d 12 : 0 0 PM to 2: 0 0 PM LA e q L A 9 0 Me a s u r e m e n t Fr e q u e n c y ( H z ) 1 6 2 0 2 5 3 1 . 5 4 0 5 0 6 3 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 1 6 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 1 5 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 8 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 2 5 0 1 , 6 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 3 , 1 5 0 4 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 6 , 3 0 0 8 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 MP 5 59 . 8 3 7 . 9 MP 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 8 5 3 . 9 5 2 . 3 5 1 . 5 5 1 . 3 5 0 . 5 5 6 . 8 5 4 . 1 4 8 . 8 4 9 . 6 4 9 . 2 5 2 . 1 5 1 . 7 4 8 . 5 4 8 . 7 4 9 . 7 5 0 . 3 5 2 . 6 5 4 . 3 5 2 . 2 4 8 . 9 4 4 . 3 4 0 . 1 3 6 . 3 3 2 . 7 2 8 . 8 2 4 . 8 2 1 . 4 1 8 . 2 MP 7 52 . 7 4 6 . 0 MP 7 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 53 . 7 5 2 . 9 5 1 . 9 5 1 . 8 5 1 . 5 5 0 . 8 5 1 . 1 4 9 . 5 4 8 . 5 4 6 . 3 4 5 . 6 4 5 . 0 4 1 . 9 4 2 . 8 4 3 . 2 4 3 . 9 4 3 . 8 4 4 . 2 4 3 . 8 4 0 . 9 3 8 . 2 4 2 . 2 3 9 . 1 4 1 . 5 3 6 . 3 3 5 . 9 3 4 . 2 3 0 . 2 2 6 . 8 MP 8 48 . 8 4 5 . 6 MP 8 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 52 . 0 5 1 . 0 5 0 . 1 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 5 5 4 . 4 5 0 . 7 4 9 . 1 4 8 . 6 4 8 . 2 4 6 . 2 4 4 . 4 4 5 . 2 4 3 . 5 4 2 . 9 4 2 . 9 4 1 . 6 4 0 . 0 3 9 . 8 3 7 . 7 3 5 . 4 3 2 . 8 2 8 . 3 2 5 . 5 2 2 . 8 2 1 . 5 2 1 . 2 1 7 . 3 1 5 . 8 MP 9 40 . 7 3 6 . 3 MP 9 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 50 . 4 4 9 . 9 4 8 . 3 4 8 . 1 4 7 . 8 4 5 . 2 4 3 . 4 4 0 . 7 4 0 . 0 3 7 . 9 3 4 . 4 3 2 . 8 3 3 . 3 3 3 . 1 3 3 . 5 3 2 . 3 3 3 . 1 3 3 . 9 3 3 . 0 3 0 . 8 2 8 . 3 2 5 . 8 2 3 . 9 2 2 . 6 2 0 . 6 1 9 . 0 1 8 . 1 1 7 . 9 1 6 . 8 MP 1 1 53 . 0 3 8 . 6 MP 1 1 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 52 . 6 5 1 . 0 4 9 . 4 5 1 . 2 5 1 . 7 5 0 . 0 4 9 . 8 5 5 . 3 5 0 . 8 4 8 . 3 4 6 . 7 4 9 . 6 4 8 . 9 4 4 . 1 4 4 . 1 4 4 . 7 4 4 . 1 4 5 . 8 4 5 . 6 4 3 . 3 4 0 . 0 3 7 . 8 3 7 . 0 3 4 . 8 3 2 . 2 3 3 . 3 3 2 . 0 2 8 . 4 2 6 . 6 MP 1 4 44 . 5 3 9 . 8 MP 1 4 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 53 . 1 4 9 . 9 4 6 . 8 4 6 . 9 4 7 . 9 4 8 . 3 4 7 . 7 4 8 . 2 4 5 . 3 4 2 . 9 4 2 . 8 4 1 . 3 4 0 . 9 3 9 . 9 4 0 . 2 4 0 . 0 3 7 . 6 3 6 . 3 3 3 . 9 3 1 . 3 2 6 . 9 2 4 . 7 2 2 . 6 2 1 . 5 2 0 . 4 1 7 . 3 1 4 . 3 1 1 . 8 1 0 . 8 MP 1 5 40 . 2 3 6 . 1 MP 1 5 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 50 . 7 4 5 . 0 4 5 . 1 4 5 . 3 4 5 . 7 4 7 . 8 4 4 . 7 4 3 . 4 4 3 . 6 4 1 . 5 4 0 . 4 3 8 . 5 3 7 . 1 3 5 . 6 3 5 . 5 3 6 . 4 3 2 . 2 3 0 . 0 2 8 . 1 2 7 . 4 2 2 . 5 2 0 . 8 1 9 . 2 1 8 . 5 1 7 . 4 1 5 . 5 1 5 . 0 1 3 . 4 1 2 . 4 MP 1 6 55 . 4 4 4 . 7 MP 1 6 Ov e r a l l 1 / 3 S p e c t r a 55 . 1 5 4 . 2 5 1 . 1 5 2 . 8 5 3 . 2 5 3 . 7 5 7 . 9 5 5 . 3 5 3 . 0 5 4 . 8 4 8 . 9 4 8 . 7 5 0 . 1 4 8 . 9 4 7 . 7 4 8 . 3 4 7 . 2 4 7 . 1 4 6 . 5 4 4 . 9 4 3 . 1 4 1 . 0 4 0 . 6 3 9 . 4 3 6 . 1 3 3 . 4 3 5 . 3 3 3 . 7 2 7 . 8 Leq = Av e r a g e so u n d le v e l . L90 = So u n d le v e l ex c e e d 90 % of th e me a s u r e m e n t pe r i o d . No t e : Th e no i s e me a s u r e m e n t s pr e s e n t e d in th e ta b l e re p r e s e n t s al l no i s e so u r c e s re c o r d e d at ea c h lo c a t i o n , an d do e s no t is o l a t e no i s e ge n e r a t e d ex c l u s i v e l y by th e fa c i l i t y 18 4 APPENDIX E - MODEL CALIBRATION DATA 185 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Appendix E Model Calibration Data NF1 86.889.02.2 NF2 86.288.11.9 NF3 87.687.60.0 NF4 87.387.80.5 NF5 86.486.60.2 NF6 84.782.5 ‐2.2 NF7 85.383.8 ‐1.5 NF8 89.087.8 ‐1.2 NF9 87.690.12.5 NF10 90.291.00.8 NF11 91.191.70.6 NF12 88.991.62.7 NF13 72.569.2 ‐3.3 NF14 83.775.1 ‐8.6 NF15 87.282.0 ‐5.2 NF16 84.984.1 ‐0.8 NF17 77.174.8 ‐2.3 NF18 74.369.8 ‐4.5 NF19 74.569.6 ‐4.9 NF20 74.772.9 ‐1.8 NF21 75.573.8 ‐1.7 NF22 77.173.6 ‐3.5 NF23 76.274.4 ‐1.8 NF24 73.574.91.4 NF25 74.977.62.7 NF26 75.779.13.4 NF27 76.579.53.0 NF28 81.184.23.1 NF29 78.883.44.6 NF30 77.482.65.2 NF31 74.277.63.4 NF32 72.077.35.3 NF33 68.370.01.7 NF34 69.266.7 ‐2.5 NF35 71.264.3 ‐6.9 Average Difference ‐0.2 Receiver Measured Sound Leq (dBA)Modeled Sound Leq (dBA)Difference (dBA) 186 Burns & McDonnell World Headquarters 9400 Ward Parkway Kansas City, MO 64114 O 816-333-9400 F 816-333-3690 www.burnsmcd.com 187 3129 Tiger Run Court, Suite 202 Carlsbad, CA 92010 619-609-0712 December 30, 2015 Mr. Michael Balliet County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health 1555 Berger Drive Suite #300 San Jose, CA 95112 Re: Lehigh Southwest Cement Company Burns & McDonnell Sound Compliance Study Peer Review Mr. Balliet: At the request of the County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health (DEH) dBF Associates, Inc. (dBFA) conducted a peer review of the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company Sound Compliance Study performed by Burns & McDonnell (B&M) (December 2015). The following are our observations and review of the study methodology and analysis performed by B&M. Work Plan Prior to the start of the study, the B&M Work Plan was reviewed. In our opinion, the proposed approach and methodology was consistent with generally accepted industry standards. Sound Survey A sound survey was performed on September 8 and 9, 2015. Ian Brewe led the sound survey for B&M. Peder Eriksson observed the sound survey for DEH. I observed the sound survey for dBFA. B&M staff performed the sound level measurements at the agreed upon locations using three American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S1.4 type 1 sound-level meters (Larson-Davis Model 831). B&M provided the current calibration certificates for the sound level meters. Far-field measurements (outside the plant in the community) were taken during four time periods over a 24-hour period on September 8 and 9, 2015. Near-field measurements (near the plant equipment) were taken on the morning of September 9, 2015. 188 Mr. Michael Balliet December 30, 2015 Page 2 Prior to conducting the sound level measurements, I accompanied three B&M staff members to each of the agreed upon locations where sound level measurements were to be performed. Minor adjustments were made to determine the optimal location to perform the measurements. B&M staff then separated into teams and proceeded to perform the sound level measurements during the daytime, mid-day, evening, and nighttime periods. During the measurement periods, I proceeded on my own to each of the locations to observe Burns & McDonnell staff perform the sound level measurements. I performed my own random sound level measurements during the evening and nighttime periods at MP5, MP11, MP15 and MP16 as shown on Figures 4-2 and 4-3 of the B&M study. The sound level measurements were performed using a calibrated Rion NA28, ANSI S1.4 type 1 sound-level meter. The sound level measurements were within +/- 1.5 dBA Leq and L90 of the measurements performed by B&M during the same time interval. Noise from the plant was not audible at the measurement locations due to extraneous noise produced by distant vehicular traffic and crickets. Plant operational and meteorological conditions during the measurement period are presented in the B&M report and appear to be correct, based on conversations with B&M, Lehigh staff and my own observations. In our opinion, B&M staff performed the sound survey according to generally accepted industry standards. Sound Modeling B&M used the Datakustik Cadna/A noise prediction model to estimate noise levels from the plant noise sources to the measurement locations. The model uses industry-accepted propagation algorithms and accepts sound power levels (in decibels re: 1 picoWatt) and sound pressure levels based on International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9613-2 standards. ISO 9613-2 is an internationally recognized standard that establishes a method for calculating the attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors in order to predict the levels of environmental noise at a distance from a variety of sources. The Cadna/A model is considered by many industry professionals as state-of-the-art. dBFA reviewed the Cadna/A electronic data files developed by B&M. Source sound levels were obtained from the near-field sound level measurements performed by B&M within the plant. In our opinion, the Cadna/A model was developed and calibrated according to generally accepted industry standards and 189 Mr. Michael Balliet December 30, 2015 Page 3 represents a conservative estimate of noise from the plant at the measurement locations. Compliance Analysis B&M applied the most restrictive noise limits available under the Santa Clara County ordinance, a limit of 40 dBA at residential properties during nighttime hours and 50 dBA during daytime hours. The lowest, or minimum, L90 sound levels measured at each location during the midnight or morning time period best represent the sound emitted by the plant without the influence from extraneous noises. Although the County Noise Ordinance is based on the Equivalent Sound Level (Leq), dBFA agrees with the use of L90 because it more accurately reflects the plant noise level at the measurement locations by eliminating a substantial portion, but not necessarily all of the higher noise levels from ambient noise sources, such as vehicular traffic and crickets that are prevalent throughout the community. In addition to the measured values from the sound survey, B&M utilized the sound modeling results to analyze the amount of plant-generated sound at each location. B&M concluded that the sound levels generated at the plant are in compliance with the most restrictive limits (40 dBA nighttime and 50 dBA daytime) contained in Santa Clara County’s noise ordinance at the surrounding residential communities. dBFA agrees with the conclusions. Recommendations dBFA was requested by County staff to recommend general measures that may further reduce noise levels from the plant if warranted. A more detailed analysis of the plant’s equipment and processes would be required to provide site specific recommendations. However, additional engineering controls at the noise source may further reduce noise from the plant. Measures to reduce noise levels from the plant generally include the following: • Replace selected components with quieter components. • Reduce the speed of stack exhaust fans. • Install acoustic silencers within the stack. • Install strategically placed noise barriers. The amount of noise reduction resulting from the implementation of one or a combination of these measures is unknown without additional analysis. 190 Mr. Michael Balliet December 30, 2015 Page 4 In conclusion, the Sound Compliance Study was performed consistent with generally accepted industry standards. Please contact me at 619-609-0712 ×101 if you have any questions. Sincerely, dBF ASSOCIATES, INC. Jeffrey D. Fuller, INCE Principal 191 County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health Consumer Protection Division 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95112-2716 (408)918-3400 FAX (408)258-5891 www.EHinfo.org Board of Supervisors: Cindy Chavez, Mike Wasserman, Dave Cortese, Ken Yeager, S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith December 30, 2015 Sam Barket, Environmental Manager Lehigh Southwest Cement Company 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Noise Complaints – Department of Environmental Health Report of Findings and Peer Review Report by dBF Associates Inc. Dear Mr. Barket: We are in receipt of the Sound Compliance Study dated December 14, 2015. I have enclosed a copy of the peer review performed by Jeff Fuller, dBF Associates Inc. and the Department of Environmental Health Report of Findings. Based on this information, we have not found evidence that Lehigh was in violation of the noise ordinance during the time noise readings were taken. We want to thank you for your cooperation throughout this investigation. Please note that we will continue to perform random, unannounced monitoring for a period of one year. Please feel free to contact us at 408-918-3400 or via email at dehweb@deh.sccgov.org if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael Balliet, Director Consumer Protection Division 192 Page 1 of 7 County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health Noise Monitoring Report of Findings for Lehigh Southwest Cement Company 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 I. Introduction The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) is authorized to enforce the County of Santa Clara (“County”) noise ordinance in unincorporated County. The noise ordinance is codified in Chapter VIII – Control of Noise and Vibration commencing with Section B11-150 of the Santa Clara County Ordinance Code (SCCOC). DEH responds to noise complaints such as neighborhood noise and other noise generating activities. DEH also coordinates with the Sheriff’s Office for enforcement related to a one-time event, such as an after-hours disruptive party or other special event. DEH received complaints starting in March 2015, alleging that noise related to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (Plant, located at 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. in unincorporated Santa Clara County) had increased. DEH continued to receive complaints in April, May and June, for a total of fourteen complaints. The complaints generally described a low steady hum as the constant source of the increased noise, although some additional loud high pitched noises were also described. DEH undertook an investigation regarding these complaints. On May 15, 2015, DEH requested that Lehigh Southwest Cement Company assist with the Department’s investigation to determine whether noise levels generated by the Plant comply with the County noise ordinance. Lehigh retained a third-party noise expert, Burns & McDonnell, to test and analyze noise from the Plant. On December 14, 2015, Lehigh submitted a Sound Compliance Study to DEH. DEH separately retained a third-party noise consultant to peer review the Sound Compliance Study. The peer review report was submitted to the County on December 30, 2015. DEH also conducted an ongoing independent investigation that included concurrent readings during the Sound Compliance Study and a separate analysis of the noise. The results of the investigation and analysis are hereinafter set forth in this Report of Findings. The Sound Compliance Study, Report of Findings, and third-party peer review of the Sound Compliance Study are intended to review noise coming from the Plant and evaluate that noise with applicable standards in the SCCOC. 193 Page 2 of 7 II. Report of Findings A. County Investigation In March 2015, DEH received a complaint alleging noise from the Plant was higher than usual and requested monitoring by DEH. DEH responded by taking noise readings at different locations near the complainant’s address and at a location closer to the Plant. The investigation revealed that DEH could not definitively link any specific noises to the Plant without additional monitoring. A violation of the noise ordinance is evidenced when: 1. The noise consistently exceeded the County noise ordinance; and 2. The noise was definitely originating from the Plant and not some other nearby source. Given the number of complaints received, the type of noise, and complexity of the Plant operations, DEH met with Lehigh representatives on May 8, 2015, to discuss the concerns raised by neighbors. Lehigh officials explained that a new 295-foot tall exhaust stack and induced draft fan was activated in March 2015, in accordance with requirements from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District to meet air quality standards. The noise from the induced draft fan could be the source of the noise emanating from the Plant; however, due to the complexity of the noise evaluation and analysis, DEH requested that the Plant prepare a noise study and separately retain a third-party expert independently selected by the County to complete a peer review of that noise study. The County selected dBF Associates Inc. to serve as the peer reviewer. During this time the County also prepared a map identifying specific locations for where noise testing would occur. Locations were selected based on available information. The County and dBF Associates Inc. also reviewed the scope of work for the Sound Compliance Study and approved the locations of the residential measurement locations. During the September 8th and 9th monitoring DEH requested consent to access private properties that had filed a complaint, but was only successful at one property. In most cases, the monitoring took place at a nearby publicly accessible location. B. Report of Findings Methodology Noise is everywhere in the environment and the ability to determine if a specific noise is in violation of the noise ordinance relies on trained professionals to render their opinion based upon measurement data and field observations. The methodology used for the Report of Findings was designed to evaluate whether the Plant was in compliance with the noise ordinance. DEH measurements were made at certain receiving or impacted receptors, which are classified in Table 1 in accordance with the noise ordinance: 194 Page 3 of 7 Table 1 – Noise Limits (SCCOC § B11-152, Table B11-152) Receiving Land Use Category Time Period Maximum Noise Level (dBA) One and two-family residential 10:00 pm-7:00 am 45 7:00 am-10:00 pm 55 Multiple-family dwelling 10:00 pm-7:00 am 50 Residential Public Space 7:00 am-10:00 pm 55 Commercial 10:00 pm -7:00 am 60 7:00 am-10:00 pm 65 Light Industrial Any Time 70 Heavy Industrial Any Time 75 Table 1 lists the various maximum noise levels as measured in dBA for different types of land uses and time periods throughout the day. “dBA” is the A-weighted sound level which is the sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted network. An “A-weighted” network best replicates human hearing. The complaints received by the County came from persons living at one or two family residential units and thus fell into the one and two family residential land use category. The noise ordinance also provides for two noise level corrections: 1. If the noise measurement occurs on a property adjoining a different land use category, the noise limit applicable to the lower land use category, plus five dB, will apply. DEH did not apply the increase for adjacent land use category (SCCOC B11-152(a)(4)). 2. In the event the alleged offensive noise contains a steady, audible tone such as a whine, screech or hum or contains music or speech, the standard limits set forth in Table 1 (above) will be reduced by five dB (SCCOC B11-152(b)). The complaints described, and field observation confirmed, that the noise contained a steady whine or hum. Therefore, DEH reduced the noise limits by five dB. Consequently, the one and two-family residential limits for DEH’s investigation were: 10:00 pm-7:00 am 40 dBA 7:00 am-10:00 pm 50 dBA For the purposes of the Lehigh Noise Compliance Study the same regulatory limit was used. 1. Time Factor in Noise Monitoring The noise ordinance also takes into account the amount of time the sound can exceed the noise limits identified in Table 1: 195 Page 4 of 7 Table 2 – Time Factor in Noise Monitoring (SCCOC B11-152(a)(2)) Noise Standard Described in Table 1 Time Limit (cumulative minutes in any hour) Noise Standard in Table 1 30 minutes Noise Standard in Table 1 plus five dB 15 minutes Noise Standard in Table 1 plus 10 dB 5 minutes Noise Standard in Table 1 plus 15 dB 1 minute Noise Standard in Table 1 plus 20 dB Not allowed for any period of time Since the DEH measurements presented in Table 4 only showed an exceedance due to background noise (i.e. crickets, traffic), there was no adjustment for the time factor in determining a violation. 2. Noise Monitoring Equipment Standard The calibrated sound level meter used was a type two 3M SoundPro DL conforming to the current ANSI standard. The meter was last calibrated in April 2015 (Attachment 1). All noise levels that were measured were filtered to use the “A-weighted” network that best replicates human hearing on a type two meter. C. DEH Review of Lehigh Sound Compliance Study (Burns & McDonnell, December 2015) The measurements for the Sound Compliance Study were performed by Burns & McDonnell on September 8 and 9, 2015. DEH staff and Jeff Fuller of dBF Associates were present to observe operating conditions and to provide a level of quality control to ensure accurate reporting. In addition, DEH performed its own independent readings at several locations (all residential land use). The results of the independent monitoring and observations by DEH are summarized in Table 3 below. Table 3 – DEH Readings for September 8 and 9 Noise Monitoring DATE / TIME LOCATION*** (From Sound Compliance Study, Burns & McDonnell Figure 4-2 & 4-3) DEH NOISE MEASUREMENT RANGE dB(A) ** OBSERVATIONS / COMMENTS 09/08/15 7:13pm MP6 32-39 Cricket and gunfire noise (from nearby gun range) were dominant Sounds from plant were not audible 09/08/15 7:36pm MP15 33-35 Cricket and gunfire noise (from nearby gun range) were dominant 196 Page 5 of 7 Sounds from plant were not audible 09/08/15 7:52pm MP14 39-49 Cricket and gunfire noise (from nearby gun range) were dominant Sounds from plant were not audible 09/09/15 12:15am MP7 47-50 Freeway and cricket noise were dominant Sounds from plant were not audible* 09/09/15 12:34am MP8 45-47 Freeway and cricket noise were dominant Sound from plant was barely audible* 09/09/15 12:52am MP9 37-38 Freeway and cricket noise were dominant Sound from plant was audible 09/09/15 01:10am MP5 34-36 Freeway and cricket noise were dominant Sounds from plant were not audible 09/09/15 01:25am MP11 40-41 Freeway and cricket noise were dominant Sounds from plant were not audible* 09/09/15 06:40am MP6 35-36 Freeway noise and rooster crowing Sounds from plant were not audible 09/09/15 06:57am MP15 41-43 Freeway noise and chirping birds Sounds from a plant were audible (could have been a nearby plant)* 09/09/15 07:15am MP14 41-43 Freeway noise and backup truck noise Sounds from a plant were audible (could have been a nearby plant)* * Exceedance was due to background noise ** The indicated sound level measurements represent the Leq within the 10 minute intervals. (Leq is the noise level that is the equivalent continuous sound over time – also considered an average.) 197 Page 6 of 7 *** Figures from Sound Compliance Study, Burns & McDonnell Figure 4-2 & 4-3 included as Attachment 2 None of the readings above revealed a violation of the noise limits in the SCCOC. D. Additional DEH Noise Monitoring Results In addition to the September 8 and 9 monitoring conducted by Burns & McDonnell, DEH also performed additional noise monitoring at the locations listed below before and after September 8 and 9, 2015. The Plant was not notified of any of the measurement dates, times, locations, or results. The additional readings were taken by DEH and in conjunction with the Lehigh Sound Compliance Study and provides independent verification that the noises DEH was hearing and measuring were either directly linked back to the Plant or not. Table 4 – DEH Readings on Dates Other Than September 8 and 9, 2015 DATE AND TIME LOCATION dB(A) NOISE MEASUREMENT** OBSERVATIONS / COMMENTS 3/15/15; 4:04 am Lebanon Drive 34.9 No background noises observed 3/15/15; 5:34 am Stevens Creek Blvd. (near the plant entrance) 54.8 No background noises observed Location of noise reading was Heavy Industrial Land Use (75 dBA limit) 9/23/15; 3:05 pm Montebello Road 48.9 None except occasional cars. Plant noise audible but could be another source 10/3/15; 2:22 am Sycamore Drive* 43.4 Traffic and cricket noise dominant; Lehigh Cement plant noise audible 10/3/15; 3:49 am Canyon Oak Drive* 41.7 Traffic and cricket noise dominant; Lehigh Cement plant noise audible 10/11/15; 11:21 pm Montebello Road* 49.5 Cricket noise was dominant; Lehigh Cement plant noise audible 10/12/15 12:34 am Montebello Road* 45.6 Cricket noise was dominant; Lehigh Cement plant noise audible 198 Page 7 of 7 10/15/15; 10:23pm Lebanon Drive* 39.9 Cricket noise dominant; Lehigh Cement plant barely audible 10/15/15; 11:46pm Ridgeway Drive* 60.2 Cricket noise and heavy truck and car traffic noise was dominant; Lehigh noise was audible *Background noise at Sycamore Drive and Canyon Oak Drive on 10/3/15 was higher than the Lehigh Cement Plant which was barely audible; Locations near Montebello Road on 10/11/15 and 10/12/15 background noise was higher than the Lehigh Cement Plant noise which was audible; Location near Lebanon Drive and Ridgeway Drive on 10/15/15- background noise was higher than the Lehigh Cement Plant noise which was audible. ** Noise meter Session Reports included in Attachment 3 None of the readings above revealed a violation of the SCCOC noise ordinance due to the predominance of background noise. E. Conclusions Based upon DEH’s review of the Burns & McDonnell Sound Compliance Study (dated December 2015), the peer review report prepared by dBF Associates Inc., and the independent DEH monitoring, DEH concludes that when the noise monitoring occurred, the Plant was operating in compliance with the SCCOC noise ordinance. III. Recommendations Although no violations of the noise ordinance were observed by DEH, we encourage the Plant to establish a noise monitoring program to evaluate noise on a more regular basis. We also recommend that the noise readings generated be made available for public review. DEH intends to continue to perform unannounced quarterly noise monitoring for a period of one year to ensure ongoing compliance. Results from this noise monitoring will be posted to the County’s website. 199 ATTACHMENT 1 200 3M Oconomowoc Personal Safety Division 3M Detection Solutions 1060 Corporate Center Drive Oconomowoc, WI 53066-4828 www.3M.com/detection 262 567 9157 800 245 0779 2625674047 Fax Page 1 of 2 3IVI Certificate of Calibration Certificate No: 5511301QILOI0123 Submitted By: COUNTY Of SANTA CLARA DEH 1555 BERGER DR #300 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 SA Serial Number: QILOI0123 Date Received: 4/16/2015 Date Issued: 4/27/2015 Valid Until: 4/27/2016 Model Conditions: Customer ID: Model: QC-IO CALIBRATOR Test Conditions: Temperature: Humidity: 18°C to 29°C As Found: As Left: IN TOLERANCE IN TOLERANCE 20% to 80% Barometric Pressure: 890 mbar to 1050 mbar SubAssemblies: Description: Serial Number: Calibration Procedure:56V981 Reference Standard(s) : I.D. Number Device ET0000556 B&K ENSEMBLE Last Calibration Date Calibration Due 6/19/2014 6/19/2015 T00230 FLUKE 45 MULTI METER 2/14/2014 2/14/2016 Measurement Uncertainty: +/- 1.1% ACOUSTIC (O.lDB) +/- 1.4% VAC +/- 0.012% HZ Estimated at 95% Confidence Level (k=2) Calibrated By: 4/27/2015 - Reviewed/Approved By: 4/27/2015 T~eputy This report certifies that all calibration equipment used in the test is traceable to NIST or other NMI, and applies only to the unit identified under equipment above. This report must not be reproduced except in its entirety without the written approval of 3M Detection Solutions. An ISO 9001 Registered Company ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration Laboratory 098-393 Rev. B Calibration Laboratory CERT#1326.01 201 3IVI 3M Oconomowoc Personal Safety Division 3M Detection Solutions 1060 Corporate Center Drive Oconomowoc, WI 53066-4828 www.3M.com/detection 262 567 9157 800 245 0779 262 567 4047 Fax Page 2 of 2 Certificate of Calibration Certificate No: 5511301QIL010123 (A) indicates out of tolerance condition Test Type Nominal Tolerance- Tolerance+ As Found As Left Unit AC OUT/1kHz 1.000 0.950 1.050 1.001 1.001 VAC Calibration 114.0 113.7 114.3 113.9 114.0 dB Frequency 1000 980 1020 999 999 Hz * indicates non accredited An ISO 9001 Registered Company ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration Laboratory ~ IAllEDIT"ffi) 098-393 Rev. B Calibration laboratory CERT# 1326.01 202 3M Oconomowoc Personal Safety Division 3M Detection Solutions 1060 Corporate Center Drive Oconomowoc, WI 53066-4828 www.3M.com/detection 262 567 9157 800 245 0779 2625674047 Fax Page 1 of 2 3IVI Certificate of Calibration Certificate No: 5511301BGK120021 Submitted By: COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEH 1555 BERGER DR #300 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 SA Serial Number: BGK120021 Date Received: Date Issued: 4/16/2015 4/27/2015 4/27/2016 Customer ID: Model: SOUNDPRO DL-2 SLM Valid Until: Test Conditions: Model Conditions: Temperature: Humidity: As Found: As Left: OUT OF TOLERANCE IN TOLERANCE 20% to 80% Barometric Pressure: 890 mbar to 1050 mbar SubAssemblies: Description: Serial Number: MICROPHONE QE 7052 1/2 IN. ELECTRET TYPE 2 PREAMP 39850 1211 6388 Calibration Procedure:53V899 Reference Standard(s) : I.D. Number EF000255 ET0000556 Device QUEST-CAL B&K ENSEMBLE Last Calibration Date Calibration Due 12/15/2014 12/15/2015 6/19/2014 6/19/2015 Measurement Uncertainty: +/- 2.2% ACOUSTIC (0.190B) Estimated at 95% Confidence Level (k~2) Calibrated By: 4/27/2015 Reviewed/Approved By: 4/27/2015 TeC~Manager/Deputy This report certifies that all calibration equipment used in the test is traceable to NIST or other NMI, and applies only to the unit identified under equipment above. This report must not be reproduced except in its entirety without the written approval of 3M Detection Solutions. An ISO 9001 Registered Company ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration Laboratory D (AillEDIT"IDJ Calibration Laboratory CERT#I326.0 I 098-393 Rev. B 203 3M Oconomowoc Personal Safety Division 3M Detection Solutions 1060 Corporate Center Drive Oconomowoc, WI 53066-4828 www.3M.com/detection 262 567 9157 800 245 0779 2625674047 Fax Page 2 of 2 3IVI Certificate of Calibration Certificate No: 5511301BGK120021 (A) indicates out of tolerance condition Test Type Nominal Tolerance- Tolerance+ As Found As Left Unit Linearity/30 to 120/114dB 114.0 113.8 114.2 A 114.5 114.1 dB Linearity/20 to 110/104dB 104.0 103.8 104.2 A 104.5 104.1 dB Linearity/l0 to 100/94dB 94.0 93.7 94.3 A 94.6 94.2 dB Linearity/O to 90/84dB 84.0 83.6 84.4 A 84.6 84.2 dB Linearity/-l0 to 80/74dB 74.0 73.5 74.5 A 74.7 74.3 dB A Weighting/125Hz 97.9 96.9 98.9 98.5 98.1 dB A Weighting/250Hz 105.4 104.4 106.4 105.9 105.5 dB A Weighting/500Hz 110.8 109.8 111.8 111.4 111.0 dB A Weighting/1kHz 114.0 113.8 114.2 A 114.5 114.1 dB A Weighting/2kHz 115.2 114.2 116.2 115.7 115.3 dB C Weighting/31.62Hz 111.0 110.5 111.5 111.0 111.0 dB C Weighting/7943Hz 111.0 110.5 111.5 110.9 110.9 dB Z Weighting/10Hz 114.0 113.5 114.5 114.0 114.0 dB Flat Response/19950Hz 114.0 113.7 114.3 113.7 113.7 dB * indicates non accredited An ISO 9001 Registered Company ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration Laboratory M (AillE DIT"AAJ Calibration Laboratory CERTffl326_OI 098-393 Rev. B 204 ATTACHMENT 2 205 COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Issued: 10/12/2015 Path: Z:\Clients\ESP\LehighSouthw\85239_Lehigh\Studies\Tech_Consult\Second Sound Study\Report\Figures\Figure 4-2 Comparative Measurement Points.mxd irbrewe 10/12/2015 Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NORTH 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Scale in Feet Figure 4-2 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Far-Field Comparative Measurement Points !( !( !(!( !( !(MP6 MP5 MP4MP3 MP2 MP1 !(Comparative Far-Field Measurement Points Source: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Lehigh Facility 206 COPYRIGHT © 2015 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Issued: 10/12/2015 Path: Z:\Clients\ESP\LehighSouthw\85239_Lehigh\Studies\Tech_Consult\Second Sound Study\Report\Figures\Figure 4-3 Compliance Measurement Points.mxd irbrewe 10/12/2015 Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NORTH 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Scale in Feet Figure 4-3 Lehigh Southwest Cement Co. Far-Field Compliance Measurement Points !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( MP9 MP8 MP7 MP5 MP16 MP15 MP14 MP11 !(Compliance Far-Field Measurement Points Source: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Lehigh Facility 207 ATTACHMENT 3 208 Session Report 12/17/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement-Lebanon Dr Start Time 3/15/2015 4:04:37 AM Stop Time 3/15/2015 5:04:37 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13D Comments Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 34.9 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Lehigh Cement-Lebanon Dr: Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 3/15/2015 3:59:22 AM CalibraƟon 114.0 Page 1209 Session Report 12/17/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement-Stevens Creek Bl near plant Start Time 3/15/2015 5:34:56 AM Stop Time 3/15/2015 6:34:56 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13D Comments Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 54.8 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Lehigh Cement-Stevens Creek Bl near plant: Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 3/15/2015 5:33:01 AM CalibraƟon 114.0 Page 1210 Session Report 10/6/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement Noise EvaluaƟon Start Time 9/23/2015 3:05:26 PM Stop Time 9/23/2015 3:20:38 PM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Unclear whether noise is from Lehigh Cement or Stevens Creek Quarry Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 48.9 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Near 15100 Montebello Road: Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 9/23/2015 3:04:58 PM CalibraƟon 114.1 Page 1211 Session Report 10/6/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement Noise EvalulaƟon Start Time 10/3/2015 2:22:42 AM Stop Time 10/3/2015 3:22:42 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Traĸc and Cricket Noise, Lehigh Cement Plant Noise Audible Logged Data Chart Sycamore Drive LocaƟon #MP7: Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 10/3/2015 2:14:55 AM CalibraƟon 114.0 10/3/2015 3:24:05 AM VeriĮcaƟon 114.0 Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 43.4 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Page 1212 Session Report 10/6/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement Plant Noise EvaluaƟon Start Time 10/3/2015 3:49:46 AM Stop Time 10/3/2015 4:49:46 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Less Cricket and Traĸc Noise, Lehigh Plant Noise Audible Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 41.7 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Canyon Oak Drive-LocaƟon #MP11: Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 10/3/2015 3:48:37 AM CalibraƟon 114.0 10/3/2015 4:50:53 AM VeriĮcaƟon 114.0 Page 1213 Session Report 10/13/2015 Information Panel Name Start Time Lehigh Cement-near Montebello Road-MP14 10/11/2015 11:21:41 PM Stop Time 10/12/2015 12:21:56 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Background noise: crickets-dominant noise; Lehigh Cement was audible; Noise spikes were due to occasional planes Ňying overhead and cars passing nearby. Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 49.5 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Lehigh Cement-near 15100 Montebello Road-MP14: Logged Data Chart Page 1214 Session Report 10/13/2015 Information Panel Name Start Time Lehigh Cement Plant-uphill from Montebello Road-MP6 10/12/2015 12:34:24 AM Stop Time 10/12/2015 1:34:24 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Dominant noise was from crickets; Lehigh Plant noise was audible; occasional noise spikes were due to planes Ňying overhead Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 45.6 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Lehigh Cement Plant-uphill from 15100 Montebello Road-MP6: Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 10/12/2015 12:32:24 AM CalibraƟon 114.0 10/12/2015 1:36:52 AM VeriĮcaƟon 114.0 Page 1215 Session Report 10/16/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement-Lebanon Drive Start Time 10/15/2015 10:23:46 PM Stop Time 10/15/2015 11:25:19 PM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Dominant noise was crickets with occasional cars and overhead plane Ňybys; Lehigh Cement Plant was barely audible Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 39.9 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Lebanon Drive; CuperƟno, CA : Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 10/15/2015 10:19:57 PM CalibraƟon 114.0 10/15/2015 11:29:20 VeriĮcaƟon 114.1 Page 1216 PM Page 2217 Session Report 10/16/2015 Information Panel Name Lehigh Cement Plant-Ridgeway Drive; CuperƟno, CA Start Time 10/15/2015 11:46:18 PM Stop Time 10/16/2015 12:46:18 AM Device Name BGK120021 Model Type SoundPro DL Device Firmware Rev R.13H Comments Background noise was crickets and numerous truck and car traĸc noise; Lehigh Cement Plant was audible but background noise was dominant. Summary Data Panel Description Meter Value Description Meter Value Leq 1 60.2 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB WeighƟng 1 A Response 1 FAST Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB WeighƟng 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart Ridgeway Drive; Cupertino, CA : Logged Data Chart Calibration History Date Calibration Action Level Cal. Model Type Serial Number Cert. Due Date 10/15/2015 11:44:48 PM CalibraƟon 114.0 Page 1218 Enclosure: cc: Lehigh Southwest Cement Company MAYOR BARRY CHANG CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3192 • FAX: (408) 777-3366 bchang@cupertino.org March 1, 2016 Santa Clara County, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95112-2716 Dear County DEH Team: During the January 19th, 2016 City Council meeting a resident shared concerns regarding noise that she described were emulating from the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company’s Plant located in unincorporated Santa Clara County. She referenced recent noise studies conducted by Santa Clara County and shared a concern that the Company worked to mitigate the noise source during the time the study was conducted, thereby invalidating its results. An additional resident affirmed he had a similar experience with persistent noise from the Plant, which had temporarily diminished during the study timeline but had once again commenced, during his communications with Council during this section of the agenda. In response to these concerns, Council agendized a discussion regarding these noise complaints and was provided a staff report that detailed the County and Lehigh’s recently completed noise monitoring studies. In the subsequent issued Report of Findings, the County recommended that the Plant establish a noise monitoring program to regularly evaluate noise and share this data with the public and notes DEH’s intention to perform unannounced quarterly noise monitoring for one year and share its results on the County’s website. This letter seeks to encourage the County and Lehigh to make available these findings via the proposed quarterly schedule and to share its results with our community, when available. Cupertino’s City Council also urges DEH to conduct all future monitoring activities independent of Lehigh, as proposed, to elevate our residents’ confidence in the data gathered and results. Thank you for this continued monitoring and prompt advancement of any noise abatement activities that would address our resident’s ongoing concerns. Barry Chang, Mayor 219 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1526 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/22/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Planning Commission’s recommendation to select Alan Takahashi as the Environmental Review Committee representative Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:Planning Commission’s recommendation to select Alan Takahashi as the Environmental Review Committee representative Accept the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Environmental Review Committee. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™220 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Planning Commission’s recommendation to select Alan Takahashi as the Environmental Review Committee representative Recommended Action Accept the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Environmental Review Committee. Description On February 23, 2016, the Planning Commission made its annual recommendations for the selection of a member to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). In accordance with City of Cupertino Municipal Code, the City Council shall review and affirm the selection. The recommendation is Alan Takahashi. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Beth Ebben, Administrative Clerk Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager 221 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1492 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/11/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for 7 Eleven Store #2367, 21530 Stevens Creek Boulevard Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Application Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicensefor7ElevenStore#2367,21530Stevens Creek Boulevard RecommendapprovaltotheCaliforniaDepartmentofAlcoholicBeverageControlofthe ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicensefor7ElevenStore#2367,21530StevensCreek Boulevard CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™222 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for 7 Eleven Store #2367, 21530 Stevens Creek Boulevard Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for 7 Eleven Store #2367, 21530 Stevens Creek Boulevard Description Name of Business: 7 Eleven Store #2367 Location: 21530 Stevens Creek Boulevard Type of Business: Package Store Type of License: 20 – Off Sale Beer & Wine (Package Store) Reason for Application: Annual Fee, Person-to-Person Transfer, Issue Temporary Permit Discussion There are no zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed and staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 20 authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises where sold. Permit U-2011-09, approving concurrent sales was approved on May 22, 2012 and has been consistently been in use since the application was approved. This address is located at the corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Bubb Road; formerly a 76 Gas Station. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 223 March 1, 2016 Cupertino City Council page 2 Prepared by: Julia Kinst, Planning Department Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development; Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager - Community Development and Strategic Planning Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachment: A - Application 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1493 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/11/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Target T3224, 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Application Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicenseforTargetT3224,19499StevensCreek Boulevard RecommendapprovaltotheCaliforniaDepartmentofAlcoholicBeverageControlofthe Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Target T3224, 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™233 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Target T3224, 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Target T3224, 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard Description Name of Business: Target T3224 Location: 19499 Stevens Creek Boulevard Type of Business: Package Store Type of License: 21 – Off Sale General (Package Store) Reason for Application: Original Fees, Annual Fee Discussion There are no zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed and staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 21 authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption off the premises where sold. This address is located at Main Street. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Julia Kinst, Planning Department Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Principal Planner; Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager - Community Development and Strategic Planning COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 234 March 1, 2016 Cupertino City Council page 2 Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachment: A - Application 235 236 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1510 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/17/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Steins Beer Garden, 10088 North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Application Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicenseforSteinsBeerGarden,10088North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 RecommendapprovaltotheCaliforniaDepartmentofAlcoholicBeverageControlofthe ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicenseforSteinsBeerGarden,10088NorthWolfeRoad, Suite 130 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™238 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Steins Beer Garden, 10088 North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Steins Beer Garden, 10088 North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 Description Name of Business: Steins Beer Garden Location: 10088 North Wolfe Road, Suite 130 Type of Business: Restaurant Type of License: 47 – On-Sale General – Eating Place (Restaurant) Reason for Application: Person-to-Person Transfer, Premise to Premise Transfer, Annual Fee, Federal Fingerprints, State Fingerprints Discussion There are no zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed and staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 47 authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the licenses premises and authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the licenses premises. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Julia Kinst, Planning Department COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 239 Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development; Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager - Community Development and Strategic Planning Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachment: A - Application 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1453 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/1/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for The City Fish, 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Application Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ApplicationforAlcoholicBeverageLicenseforTheCityFish,21678StevensCreek Boulevard RecommentapprovaltotheDepartmentofAlcoholicBeverageControloftheApplicationfor Alcoholic Beverage License for The City Fish, 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™247 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for The City Fish, 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for The City Fish, 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard Description Name of Business: The City Fish Location: 21678 Stevens Creek Boulevard Type of Business: Restaurant Type of License: 41 – On-Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place (Restaurant) Reason for Application: Person-to-Person Transfer, Annual Fee, Issue Temporary Permit Discussion There are no zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed and staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 41 authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. This location was formerly Flour and Spice and Gumba’s Restaurant. The nearest cross street is Imperial Avenue. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Julia Kinst, Planning Department COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 248 March 1, 2016 Cupertino City Council page 2 Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Principal Planner; Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager - Community Development and Strategic Planning Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachment: A - Application 249 250 251 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1474 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/4/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Survey of residents to provide feedback on willingness to support a sales tax measure or an employer tax. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:Surveyofresidentstoprovidefeedbackonwillingnesstosupportasalestaxmeasure or an employer tax. 1)AuthorizetheCityManagertonegotiateandexecuteaconsultantcontractand/or agreementswithothercitieswithacosttotheCityofCupertinoofupto$40,000to surveyresidentsontheirwillingnesstosupportasalestaxmeasureoranemployertaxto fund mass transit services along major commute corridors; and 2)AmendapprovedFY15/16OperatingBudget(Transportation-TrafficEngineering100- 88-844) by an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™252 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Survey of residents to provide feedback on willingness to support a sales tax measure or an employer tax. Recommended Action 1) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a consultant contract and/or agreements with other cities with a cost to the City of Cupertino of up to $40,000 to survey residents on their willingness to support a sales tax measure or an employer tax to fund mass transit services along major commute corridors; and 2) Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget (Transportation-Traffic Engineering 100-88-844) by an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000. Background At the City Council meeting of February 2, 2016, in discussing the potential 2016 Transportation Tax Measure being led by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), the Council directed staff to return to the next meeting with a proposal to enter into a contract to conduct a survey of Cupertino residents on questions that may not be posed as part of the current surveying being done by the Silicon Valley Leadership Group (SVLG). This proposed VTA transportation tax measure would be focused on enhancing public transportation systems such as BART and Caltrain, improving pavement maintenance, highways, and expressways, and improving active transportation alternatives for bicyclists and pedestrians. While staff have been told that questions to be included in the remaining surveying that the SVLG will be conducting have not fully been finalized, they ultimately may not yield information of the willingness of voters to support a sales tax to extend mass 253 2 transit into the West Valley and North County. Also, the SVLG will not be asking residents if they would support an employer tax to support similar improvements. Fiscal Impact This action would authorize a not to exceed amount of $40,000 for a survey consultant contract, however it also may be possible that other cities collaborate in the effort which could reduce the cost to the City of Cupertino. If other cities agree to participate in this surveying, this Council authorization would also allow the City Manager to enter into cost-sharing agreements with the other cities. The transfer of funds will not occur unless the consultant contract is needed. Sustainability Impact Any future projects that enhance non-vehicular transportation modes or reduce congestion will have positive effects on greenhouse gas emissions. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: None 254 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1390 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/15/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I, City Project No. 2015-22 & 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project, City Project No. 2014-15 contract amendment. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I, City Project No. 2015-22 & 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project, City Project No. 2014-15 contract amendment. StaffrecommendsCounciltakethefollowingactionsforconsultingservicesprovidedby Pavement Engineering, Inc. (PEI): 1.Authorizeanincreaseinthecontractamountfrom$305,380to$400,380forthe2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I; and 2.Authorizeanincreaseinthecontractamountfrom$75,685to$85,000forthe2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project; and 3.AuthorizetheCityManagertonegotiateandexecuteamendedserviceorderagreements forthe2015PavementMaintenanceProject-PhaseIand2014SidewalkAccessibility ImprovementProjectforthenottoexceedamountsof$400,380and$85,000, respectively. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™255 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I, City Project No. 2015-22 & 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project, City Project No. 2014-15 contract amendment. Recommended Action Staff recommends Council take the following actions for consulting services provided by Pavement Engineering, Inc. (PEI): 1. Authorize an increase in the contract amount from $305,380 to $400,380 for the 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I; and 2. Authorize an increase in the contract amount from $75,685 to $85,000 for the 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute amended service order agreements for the 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I and 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvement Project for the not to exceed amounts of $400,380 and $85,000, respectively. Discussion On May 5, 2015, the City Council authorized an agreement with PEI for consultant services on various street improvement projects in the amount of $431,000. The scope of work required of the consultant includes testing and inspection, construction management of the pavement projects and design support for concrete improvements. The agreement required these services for three City projects. The amount authorized, expended to date and additional budget need is as follows: Project Authorized Amount Amount Expended to Date Total Expected Expenditure Savings / (Shortfall) 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase I $305,380 $276,250 $400,380 ($95,000) 2015 Pavement Maintenance Project - Phase II $49,935 $28,292 $28,292 $21,643 2014 Sidewalk Accessibility Improvements $75,685 $62,641 $85,000 ($9,315) Total $431,000 $367,183 $513,672 $82,672 256 2 The $431,000 previously authorized to assist with the management of these three projects is 5.2% of the total authorized construction contract amounts. Increasing the consultant budget amount to $513,672 will increase this percentage to 6.3% for all three projects. The typical fee for these services has generally been in the range of 6 – 9% of total construction costs. Additionally, the total increase to the contracts of $82,672 will be partially offset by approximately $26,000 in reimbursements from the pavement contractor, the City of San Jose, and the City of Saratoga, as described below. The request to increase the authorized amount for consultant services for these projects is due to:  Competitive unit pricing of pavement maintenance and sidewalk accessibility contracts o The pavement maintenance contract awarded by Council (May 19, 2015) authorized a total project of $6.287M with $571k earmarked as a contingency. The sidewalk accessibility project contract award by Council (April 7, 2015) authorized a total project of $1.138M with $135k earmarked as a contingency. Because of the competitive pricing received on these projects, staff has directed additional work and intends to expend the contingency. This additional construction work will increase the efforts of PEI.  Added consultant work to manage technical construction complexities in areas where streets are not completely improved with curb and gutter. o Specifically on McClellan Road from Foothill Blvd to Mira Vista Road, work was done to improve drainage and to maximize paved surfaces for bikes and pedestrians. Monta Vista area streets, due to lack of curb and gutter improvements, will require similar efforts.  Cost share agreement with the Cities of San Jose and Saratoga o The authorization of this agreement by Council (October 6, 2015) added $156,000 to the Phase I asphalt project. Per the agreement, each agency pays 110% for improvements, which the 10% surcharge is intended to cover the pro-rata share of construction management services for work within their City. This cumulatively, between the two cities, is expected to reimburse the Cupertino by approximately $17,000 for construction management.  Construction contractor scheduling issues o G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. (Bortolotto) is the contractor for the pavement maintenance project. A subcontractor to Bortolotto responsible for lowering and raising manholes and water valves has failed to perform, causing project delays and additional costs to the City for PEI to provide their services. As provided in the contract documents, the City will receive reimbursement from Bortolotto for this additional cost. This credit is expected to be approximately $9,000. 257 3 Sustainability Impact None. Fiscal Impact No additional appropriation is needed to cover the increased contract amount, as the current appropriation for the annual pavement projects are sufficient. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Roger Lee, Assistant Director of Public Works Reviewed by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: None 258 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1535 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/24/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Conceptual Study for Route 85 Corridor Mass Transit Alternatives Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Resolution for Regional Mass Transit B - Light Rail or Dedicated Bus Lane Information Sheet Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Conceptual Study for Route 85 Corridor Mass Transit Alternatives 1)AuthorizetheCityManagertonegotiateandexecuteaconsultantcontractand/or agreementswithothercitieswithacosttotheCityofCupertinoofupto$40,000to completeaconceptualalternativesstudyfortheStateRoute85Corridor,betweenState Route 87 and Highway 101; and 2)AmendapprovedFY15/16OperatingBudget(Transportation-TrafficEngineering100- 88-844) by an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™259 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Conceptual Study for Route 85 Corridor Mass Transit Alternatives Recommended Action 1) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a consultant contract and/or agreements with other cities with a cost to the City of Cupertino of up to $40,000 to complete a conceptual alternatives study for the State Route 85 Corridor, between State Route 87 and Highway 101; and 2) Amend approved FY 15/16 Operating Budget (Transportation-Traffic Engineering 100-88-844) by an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000. Background The Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) is actively discussing the possibility of placing a countywide transportation sales tax measure on the November 2016 ballot. This tax measure would be focused on enhancing public transportation systems such as BART and Caltrain, improving pavement maintenance, highways, and expressways, and improving active transportation alternatives for bicyclists and pedestrians. Recently, through the advocacy of a coalition of West Valley and North County cities, there is an element of the tax measure being discussed that is titled, “West Valley/North County Transit.” Additionally, the City Council had, in July 2015, adopted Resolution No. 15-077, “Implementation of long-term mass transit solutions to serve major employment centers along and near the highway 85 corridor” (Attachment A). Subsequently, the VTA established a State Route (SR) 85 Corridor Policy Advisory Board to ensure the stakeholder cities in the SR 85 corridor are involved in the development of existing and potential transportation capital projects along the corridor 260 2 and have the opportunity to provide input and recommendations to the VTA Board of Directors At the February 2, 2016 City Council meeting, there was an item discussed to establish an advocacy position for the City of Cupertino with regard to possible allocations for the proceeds from the proposed Transportation Tax Measure. There was an attachment (Attachment B to this report) that provided some very general orders-of-magnitude estimates for a light rail system, a bus rapid transit system, and a lane widening for the State Route 85 between the limits State Route 87 and Highway 101. Discussion In order to provide the City Council with more detailed, but still very conceptual studies of alternatives and cost estimates, it is recommended that a transportation consultant, with mass transit and highway construction experience be retained. The alternatives to be studied could range from a lightrail system, a conversion of the existing HOV lane to express lane with a widening for a bus-only, or BRT lane, and possibly other combinations. This study would need to provide results by the beginning of May in order to provide information to inform negotiations on what may be included in the transportation tax measure in November. Fiscal Impact This action would authorize a not to exceed amount of $40,000 for a transportation consultant contract, however it also may be possible that other cities collaborate in the effort which could reduce the cost to the City of Cupertino or provide a more robust alternatives analysis. If other cities agree to participate in this effort, this Council authorization would also allow the City Manager to enter into cost-sharing agreements with the other cities. The transfer of funds will not occur unless the consultant contract is needed. Sustainability Impact Any future projects that enhance non-vehicular transportation modes or reduce congestion will have positive effects on greenhouse gas emissions. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Timm Borden, Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A - Resolution for Regional Mass Transit 261 3 B - Light Rail or Dedicated Bus Lane Information Sheet 262 Attachment A 1 RESOLUTION NO. 15-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO SUPPORTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LONG-TERM MASS TRANSIT SOLUTIONS TO SERVE MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTERS ALONG AND NEAR THE HIGHWAY 85 CORRIDOR WHEREAS, many cities in the West Valley and the North County area desire a new, long- range transportation vision for the entire region, thinking beyond the car; and WHEREAS, the vision shall focus on mass transit improvements to reduce/replace single- occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips; and WHEREAS, the vision recognize the evolution of where jobs are located in relation to where people live; and WHEREAS, the new transportation vision shall include a sustainable, financially viable mass transit solution that services housing and employers along and near the Highway 85 corridor from San Jose to Mountain View; and WHEREAS, the new transportation vision shall include infrastructure and facilities that support the system, such as “last-mile” shuttle (private or public) or bicycle/pedestrian corridors between stations and employers, as well as transit center(s) to facilitate a robust shuttle network; and WHEREAS, the vision shall identify transit center locations near mass transit system as connection for last-mile services; and WHEREAS, the vision shall improve connections to other inter-county mass transit systems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino City Council was presented with all of the information described in the recitals and has considered this information in adopting this resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino City Council determines that this proposal for near-term and long-term regional mass transit is in the best interest of the City; and 263 Attachment A 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to submit this proposal (Exhibit A), in similar content and form, to the Valley Transportation Agency to be included in the Valley Transportation Plan 2040. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 18th day of August, 2015, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: ________________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Rod Sinks, Mayor 264 Attachment A 3 Exhibit A MASS TRANSIT PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION IN VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2040 Proposed Project Name/Title: Future Mass Transit Needs for Santa Clara County. Proposed Project Description: Develop, finance and construct a mass transit system to serve job centers along and near the Highway 85 Corridor. The project would:  Focus on mass transit improvements to reduce/replace single- occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips.  Recognize where jobs are located in relation to where people live.  Include a mode with an exclusive guideway.  Develop plans for effective last-mile connections from transit corridors to major employment areas. Connection modes should include public and private shuttles and highly developed and accessible bicycle and pedestrian links.  Identify transit center locations near the mass transit system as connection for last-mile services.  Improve connections to other inter-county mass transit systems.  Anticipate/incorporate new and emerging transportation technologies as mass transit alternatives. Project Cost: Estimated $800 Million which would include design, environmental clearance, as well as the local match to support full construction of a project which would serve the mass transit needs of the region, with an initial phase on the Highway 85 corridor from Highway 87 to immediately north of Highway 101. 265 Attachment B Light Rail or Dedicated Bus Lane Information Sheet Cupertino City Council Meeting February 2, 2016 Item #12 Light Rail Characteristics Assumptions: Typical Train Length: 91 Feet Long, articulated Width: ~9 Feet Capacity: 220 people Top Speed: ~66 MPH 2-5 Cars in Train Car v. Bus v. Light Rail Capacities Car: Max 2,400 people/lane/hour, assuming 1.2 passengers/car Bus: Up to 7,000 people/lane/hour, assuming dedicated lane such as BRT, but number typically limited by demand Light Rail: Up to 20,000 people/lane/hour, but typically limited by demand. Typical ridership less than 4,000 people/lane/hour, however SF system is approximately 9,000 people/lane/hour Typical Light Rail Construction Costsi Construction Cost: $15M (i.e. Sacramento, Salt Lake City) -$179M/mile (i.e. Seattle), but average cost in U.S. is about $35M/mile Rough Route 85 Corridor (Route 87 to Highway 101) LRT Cost 18.7 Miles X $35M/mile = $655M, however in 2014 VTA provided information to the Cupertino City Council in conjunction with their Express Lanes project that a LRT in the Route 85 Median would be approximately $1.4B, which could be likely due to bay area construction costs and regional factors. Freeway Lane Expansion Cost Construction Cost: $1.0M to $8.5M per lane mile with an average of $2M Bus Lane (BRT) Expansion Cost Very Roughly $150M for a dedicated lane in the median from Route 87 to Highway 101 in Mountain View i The cost of light rail construction varies widely, largely depending on the amount of tunneling and elevated structures required. Seattle's new light rail system is by far the most expensive in the US, at $179 million per mile, since it includes extensive tunneling in poor soil conditions, elevated sections, and stations as deep as 180 feet (55 m) below ground level. This results in costs more typical of subways or rapid transit systems than light rail. At the other end of the scale, four systems (Baltimore, Maryland; Camden, New Jersey; Sacramento, California; and Salt Lake City, Utah) incurred construction costs of less than $20 million per mile. Over the US as a whole, excluding Seattle, new light rail construction costs average about $35 million per mile. 266 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1424 Name: Status:Type:Public Hearings Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/26/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Approval of the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Fee Schedule which was originally noticed for tonights agenda will be continued to March 15. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ApprovaloftheFiscalYear2016-17FeeSchedulewhichwasoriginallynoticedfor tonights agenda will be continued to March 15. Under Postponements this item will be continued to March 15 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™267 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1362 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/13/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Consideration and approval of the Mid-Year Financial Report and recommended budget adjustments for Fiscal Year 2015-16 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A. Mid-Year Financial Report B. Draft Resolution C. Accounting Staff by Size of GF Budget D. Accounting Staff Burden Ratios by GF Budget E. Accounting Staff Burden Ratio by Total Budget F. Performance Measures - Clean Version G. Performance Measures - Redline Version Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ConsiderationandapprovaloftheMid-YearFinancialReportandrecommended budget adjustments for Fiscal Year 2015-16 1. Accept the City Manager’s Mid-Year Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2015-16 2.ApprovetheMid-YearadjustmentsforFiscalYear2015-16asdescribedintheMid-Year Financial Report 3. Adopt Resolution No. 16-018 approving Mid-Year budget adjustment CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™268 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3220 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Consideration and approval of the Mid-Year Financial Report and recommended budget adjustments for Fiscal Year 2015-16 Recommended Action 1. Accept the City Manager’s Mid-Year Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2015-16 2. Approve the Mid-Year adjustments for Fiscal Year 2015-16 as described in the Mid-Year Financial Report 3. Adopt a resolution approving Mid-Year budget adjustments Background On June 2, 2015, the City Council adopted the FY 2015-16 Budget, a $118.6 million spending plan for the City of Cupertino. On November 17, 2015, Council received an update on the City’s spending plan as part of the City Manager’s First Quarter Financial Report, which revised the budget to account for encumbrances and carryover expenditure appropriations from FY 2014-15. Council approved $3,164,029 in additional expenditures in the first two quarters of the fiscal year resulting in an amended budget of $154,781,894. These FY 2015-16 budget adjustments are summarized in the table below: Fund FY 15-16 Final Adopted Carryovers Encumbrances Adjustments Approved in 1st-2nd Quarters FY 15-16 Amended Budget as Dec 31, 2015 General $67,575,053 $2,550,765 $6,997,542 $1,900,571 $79,023,931 Special Revenue $20,894,961 $5,452,758 $9,102,429 $617,065 $36,067,213 Debt Service $3,167,538 - - - $3,167,538 Capital Projects $8,950,000 $5,609,187 $1,106,226 $500,000 $16,165,413 Enterprise $9,577,071 $964,209 $183,786 $34,518 $10,759,584 Internal Service $8,401,015 $988,734 $96,591 $111,875 $9,598,215 Total All Funds $118,565,638 $15,565,653 $17,486,574 $3,164,029 $154,781,894 Discussion The Mid-Year Financial Report focuses on the status of the City’s budget as of December 31, 2015, and recommends adjustments to ensure the budget reflects the City’s current revenue outlook and is responsive to changing spending priorities. As 269 2 shown in the chart below, $4,262,725 in budget adjustments are being requested, of which $2,791,725 involves a transfer of excess fund balance to the Capital Reserve per the City’s Reserve and One Time Use Policy. If approved, the City’s new spending plan would total $159,044,619. Mid-Year Financial Report Summary by Fund Fund Amended Budget as of Dec 31, 2015 Requested Mid-Year Adjustments Year End Projections General $79,023,931 $3,721,740 $82,745,671 Special Revenue $36,067,213 - $36,067,213 Debt Service $3,167,538 - $3,167,538 Capital Projects $16,165,413 - $16,165,413 Enterprise $10,759,584 $350,000 $11,109,584 Internal Service $9,598,215 $190,985 $9,789,200 Total All Funds $154,781,894 $4,262,725$159,044,619 The recommended budget adjustments would be funded using department revenue of $3,403,725 and unassigned fund balance of $859,000 as summarized in the table below: Fund Department Description ExpenditureRevenueFund Balance General Fund Administrative Services 50,000 - (50,000) Accountant I/II position General Fund Administrative Services 191,000 (191,000) Litigation claims General Fund City Manager Discretionary Fund(40,000) - 40,000 Transfer out to pay costs associated with backfilling a position for employee working on a special project General Fund Community Development 120,000 - (120,000) Anticipated litigation/code enforcement (closed session item) General Fund Public Affairs 41,160 - (41,160) Reallocation of employee costs for compensation and benefits to the General Fund from Internal Service Fund General Fund Commissions (5,145) - 5,145 Reallocation of employee costs for compensation and benefits General Fund Public Works 150,000 - (150,000) Traffic Impact Fee Study (Council Work plan item to implement a citywide transportation plan and enact a transportation impact fee for new developments to ensure sustainable funding levels for the plan) General Fund Public Works 100,000 - (100,000) Comprehensive Water System Audit General Fund Public Works 41,000 - (41,000) Converting Safe Routes to Schools Coordinator position from part-time to full-time General Fund Recreation and Community Services 20,000 - (20,000) Replacement of AED's for Disaster Preparedness/Citizen Corps General Fund Recreation and Community Services 35,000 35,000 - New part-time Code Enforcement Officer General Fund Non-Departmental 3,018,725 - (3,018,725) Transfers out to other funds 3,721,740 35,000 (3,686,740) Capital FundNon-Departmental 2,791,725 2,791,725 Transfer in excess fund balance to Capital Reserve Enterprise FundsPublic Works 350,000 350,000 - International Disposal Corp unanticipated cost increases Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 12,000 12,000 - GIS Intern for the second half of the Fiscal Year (data entry; assistance with Cityworks and easements for City Clerk, Public Works and Planning) Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 5,000 5,000 - Freeance Software/Maintenance Cityworks Mobile Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 170,000 170,000 - IT (EPC Contractors) professional services for server room upgrades, deployment of WiFi, deployment of VDI and significant improvement of Help Desk support Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs (36,015) - 36,015 Reallocation of employee costs for compensation and benefits Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 40,000 40,000 - Transfer in costs associated with backfilling a position for employee working on a special project 540,985 3,368,725 2,827,740 4,262,725 3,403,725 (859,000) Recommended Adjustments Total General Fund Total Other Funds TOTAL ALL FUNDS 270 3 General Fund Update Revenue Property tax, sales tax, and transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues are strong and projected to exceed estimates by $4.7 million. This increase is offset by lower than anticipated revenues of $3.4 million in development-related fees and charges. Overall, General Fund revenues are projected to be $1.2 million above budgeted levels. Expenditures As of Mid-Year, several General Fund departments are requesting adjustments totaling $3.7 million. These requests include litigations costs, a traffic impact fee study, a water system audit, equipment purchases, software and maintenance costs, contract services, staffing and transfer out of unassigned fund balance. These requests would be funded by increases in revenue and General Fund unassigned fund balance. These requests are summarized in the Mid-Year Report. Fund Balance As part of the Mid-Year Financial Report the City projects unassigned fund balance for Fiscal Year 2015-16 is estimated at $.5 million, a decrease of $12.95 million or 96% under the first quarter projection. This decrease is due to an increase in encumbered funds and the recommendation to transfer out $2.8 million in unassigned fund balance to the Capital Reserve per the City’s Reserve and One Time Use Policy. Staffing Currently, the city has a total of 181.75 FTEs. As of Mid-Year, staff is requesting two additional full-time positions, the conversion of a part-time Safe Routes to Schools Coordinator to a full-time position and an additional Accountant I/II. ActualActualsFinal Budget1st Qtr Year End Projection CLASSIFICATION 2013-142014-152015-16Estimates2015-16 Total Non Spendable3.36 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Total Restricted- 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Assigned - - - - - Economic Uncertainty I 12.50 0.03 19.00 - 19.00 Economic Uncertainty II 1.40 12.50 - - - Economic Fluctuation 2.00 2.00 1.40 - 1.40 CIP Future Project - 1.40 - - - PERS 0.50 0.50 0.10 - 0.10 One Time Revnue - - - - - Equipment Fund Loan for 1A - - - - - Reserve for Encumbrances 1.27 7.00 2.08 - 10.00 Revenue Liability 3.92 - - - - General Building 1.15 - - - - Wolfe Road Transportation Study 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 I-280 Trail Study 0.25 0.25 0.25 (0.25) - Total Assigned23.99 24.68 23.83 32.83 31.50 Total UnAssigned18.33 15.31 10.89 13.45 0.50 TOTAL FUND BALANCE 45.68 41.85 36.58 - 33.86 271 4 Safe Routes to School Coordinator Public Works is requesting additional funds to expand the Safe Routes to School Coordinator role to a full-time position, aligned with ongoing Council direction to prioritize and pair traffic safety improvements around schools with expanded active mobility engagements with students and parents alike. The program was initiated last year as a pilot program and has been very successful. The additional expense will allow the City to expand the program to additional school sites. Accountant I/II The size of the accounting staff in the Finance division was 4.4 full-time equivalent positions in FY 2009-10. The budget for FY 2009-10 was $17.0 million for the general fund and $33.7 for all funds (total budget). In FY 2015-16, the general fund and all fund budgets grew to $67.6 million and $118.6 million, respectively. That growth is almost 400% for the General Fund and 350% for the total budget. Although this is great news for Cupertino, it is exceptionally challenging to manage this level of financial growth with no growth in accounting resources. As staff becomes more burdened, it is difficult to maintain effective segregation of duties and continually train and develop line staff who enter financial transactions into the City’s financial system. Both are integral to maintain adequate internal controls of City financial processes. Additionally, when compared to other Santa Clara County cities, the City of Cupertino has the smallest number of staff dedicated to the accounting function with only one exception, Los Altos Hills (see attachment C). When a burden ratio is applied to staffing levels (attachments D and E), Cupertino ranks second for its burden to staffing ratio when comparing size of General Fund budget and third when evaluated against total budget. Adding an accountant position will provide improved internal controls and assist the City to better manage its finances while providing more timely and transparent reporting. Performance Measures Updated performance measures that align with government and private industry best practices have been included in the Mid-Year Financial Report. Staff will continue to provide updates to Council on the performance measures as part of the quarterly budget reports and the proposed and final budgets. Attachment F represents the status of the performance measures as of Mid-Year. Conclusion City staff recommends adjustments of $4,262,725 in appropriations and $3,403,725 in projected revenue resulting in an increase use of fund balance of $859,000 across all funds. Staff will continue to monitor the 2015-16 Fiscal Year Amended Budget and be 272 5 prepared to make recommendations and changes based on business needs and Council priorities before June 30, 2016 to ensure the City ends the year within budgeted appropriations. Prepared by: Karen Bernard-Guerin, Senior Management Analyst Reviewed for submission by: Kristina Alfaro, Director of Administrative Services Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A – Mid-Year Financial Report - FY2015-16 B - Draft Resolution C - Accounting Staffing by Size of GF Budget D - Accounting Staff Burden Ratios by GF Budget E - Accounting Staff Burden Ratios by Total Budget F - Performance Measures - Clean Version for each Department G - Performance Measures - Redline Version for each Department 273 General Fund—General Fund Five Year Comparison of Expenditures, Revenues and Changes to Fund Balance Mid Year Actuals Amended Budget Year End Actuals Mid Year Actuals Amended Budget Year End Actuals Mid Year Actuals Amended Budget Year End Actuals Mid Year Actuals Final Budget Amended Budget FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 Revenue $19.3 $66.7 $54.7 $21.6 $52.2 $73.9 $48.7 $56.1 $83.5 $24.9 $68.2 $68.2 Expenditures $30.6 $66.5 $44.7 $26.4 $59.4 $64.4 $37.7 $89.7 $86.2 $28.1 $67.6 $79.0 Fund Balance $(11.3)$0.2 $9.9 $(4.8)$(7.2)$9.5 $11.0 $(33.6)$(2.7)$(3.2)$0.6 $(10.8) $(40.0) $(20.0) $- $20.0 $40.0 $60.0 $80.0 $100.0 In M i l l i o n s MID-YEAR REPORT The following is the Mid-Year Financial Report for the period of July 2015-December 2015 for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year. It has been prepared to inform the City Council, City leadership and the public of the City’s financial status at the mid-point of this fiscal year. The report provides revenue and expenditure summaries and recommends adjustments to City budg ets needed since the adoption of the Final Budget in June 201 5. BACKGROUND On June 2, 2015, the City Council adopted the FY 2015-16 Budget, a $118.6 million spending plan for the City of Cupertino. On November 17, 2015, Council received an update on the City’s spending plan as part of the City Manager’s First Quarter Financial Report, which revised the budget to account for encumbrances and carryover expenditure appropriations from FY 2014-15. Council approved $3,164,029 in additional expenditures in the first two quarters of the fiscal year resulting in an amended budget of $154,781,894. FY 2015-16 Proposed Budget thru the Mid-Year | Amended Budget FY 2015-16 | Flow of Funds Chart (in Millions) GENERAL FUND UPDATE 274 Revenues General Fund—General Fund Revenue Five Year Comparison $17.5 $19.3 $21.6 $48.7 $24.9 $47.6 $51.1 $83.5 $83.5 $69.4 $43.3 $54.7 $88.4 $73.9 $68.2 $- $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0 $50.0 $60.0 $70.0 $80.0 $90.0 $100.0 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 6 Month Actual Year End Actual Budget Property tax, sales tax, and transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues are strong and projected to exceed estimates by $4.7 million. This increase is offset by lower than anticipated revenues of $3.4 million in development-related fees and charges. Overall, General Fund revenues are projected to be $1.2 million above budgeted levels. EXPENDITURES General Fund—General Fund Expenditure Five Year Comparison $20.4 $30.6 $26.4 $37.7 $28.1 $41.3 $44.7 $64.4 $86.2 $82.7 $66.5 $59.4 $89.7 $79.0 $79.0 $3.2 $13.3 $7.3 $15.8 $7.5 $- $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0 $50.0 $60.0 $70.0 $80.0 $90.0 $100.0 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 6 Month Actual Year End Actual Budget Transfers Out As of Mid-Year, several General Fund departments are requesting adjustments totaling $3.7 million. These requests include litigations costs, a traffic impact fee study, a water system audit, equipment purchases, software and maintenance costs, contract services, staffing and transfer out of unassigned fund balance. These requests would be funded by increases in revenue and General Fund unassigned fund balance. These requests are summarized below: GENERAL FUND UPDATE (continued) 275 58% 68% 29% 41% 36%35% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Revenue Expenditures High Low FY 15-16 Fund Department Description ExpenditureRevenueFund Balance General Fund Administrative Services 50,000 - (50,000) Accountant I/II position General Fund Administrative Services 191,000 (191,000) Litigation claims General Fund City Manager Discretionary Fund(40,000) - 40,000 Transfer out to pay costs associated with backfilling a position for employee working on a special project General Fund Community Development 120,000 - (120,000) Anticipated litigation/code enforcement (closed session item) General Fund Public Affairs 41,160 - (41,160) Reallocation of employee costs for compensation and benefits to the General Fund from Internal Service Fund General Fund Commissions (5,145) - 5,145 Reallocation of employee costs for compensation and benefits General Fund Public Works 150,000 - (150,000) Traffic Impact Fee Study (Council Work plan item to implement a citywide transportation plan and enact a transportation impact fee for new developments to ensure sustainable funding levels for the plan) General Fund Public Works 100,000 - (100,000) Comprehensive Water System Audit General Fund Public Works 41,000 - (41,000) Converting Safe Routes to Schools Coordinator position from part-time to full-time General Fund Recreation and Community Services 20,000 - (20,000) Replacement of AED's for Disaster Preparedness/Citizen Corps General Fund Recreation and Community Services 35,000 35,000 - New part-time Code Enforcement Officer General Fund Non-Departmental 3,018,725 - (3,018,725) Transfers out to other funds 3,721,740 35,000 (3,686,740) Recommended Adjustments Total General Fund GENERAL FUND TRENDS As of December 31, 2015, General Fund expenditures are $28.1 million; this represents 35% of the budgeted appropriations. Expenditures at the mid- year point of the prior three years were between 41% and 68% of the final actual expenditures, placing this year below the range. This is primarily due to the timing of expenditures in Capital Outlays and Special Projects being completed later in this fiscal year than in previous fiscal years. General Fund revenues are at $24.9 million; this represents 37% of the budgeted revenue. Revenues at the mid-year point of the prior three years were between 29% and 58%, placing this year within the range. As part of the Mid-Year Financial Report the City projects unassigned fund balance for Fiscal Year 2015-16 is estimated at $.5 million, a decrease of $12.95 million or 96% under the first quarter projection. This decrease is due to an increase in encumbered funds and the recommendation to transfer out $2.8 million in unassigned fund balance to the Capital Reserve per the City’s Reserve and One Time Use Policy. General Fund - Fund Balance 276 Fund Department Description ExpenditureRevenueFund Balance 3,721,740 35,000 (3,686,740) Capital FundNon-Departmental 2,791,725 2,791,725 Transfer in excess fund balance to capital reserve Enterprise FundsPublic Works 350,000 350,000 - International Disposal Corp unanticipated cost increases Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 12,000 12,000 - GIS Intern for the second half of the Fiscal Year (data entry; assistance with Cityworks and easements for City Clerk, Public Works and Planning) Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 5,000 5,000 - Freeance Software/Maintenance Cityworks Mobile Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 170,000 170,000 - IT (EPC Contractors) professional services for server room upgrades, deployment of WiFi, deployment of VDI and significant improvement of Help Desk support Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs (36,015) - 36,015 Reallocation of employee costs for compensation and benefits Internal Service FundsPublic Affairs 40,000 40,000 - Transfer in costs associated with backfilling a position for employee working on a special project 540,985 3,368,725 2,827,740 4,262,725 3,403,725 (859,000) Total General Fund Total Other Funds TOTAL ALL FUNDS Recommended Adjustments STAFFING Currently, the City has a total of 181.75 FTEs. As of Mid-Year, staff is requesting two additional full-time positions, the conversion of a part-time Safe Routes to Schools Coordinator to a full- time position and an additional Accountant I/II. SUMMARY City staff recommends adjustments of $4,262,725 in appropriations and $3,403,725 in projected revenue resulting in an decrease use of fund balance of $859,000 across all funds. Staff will continue to monitor the 2015-16 Fiscal Year Amended Budget and be prepared to make recommendations and changes based on business needs and Council priorities before June 30, 2016 to ensure the City ends the year within budgeted appropriations. ActualActualsFinal Budget1st Qtr Year End Projection CLASSIFICATION 2013-142014-152015-16Estimates2015-16 Total Non Spendable3.36 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Total Restricted- 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Assigned - - - - - Economic Uncertainty I 12.50 0.03 19.00 - 19.00 Economic Uncertainty II 1.40 12.50 - - - Economic Fluctuation 2.00 2.00 1.40 - 1.40 CIP Future Project - 1.40 - - - PERS 0.50 0.50 0.10 - 0.10 One Time Revnue - - - - - Equipment Fund Loan for 1A - - - - - Reserve for Encumbrances 1.27 7.00 2.08 - 10.00 Revenue Liability 3.92 - - - - General Building 1.15 - - - - Wolfe Road Transportation Study 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 I-280 Trail Study 0.25 0.25 0.25 (0.25) - Total Assigned23.99 24.68 23.83 32.83 31.50 Total UnAssigned18.33 15.31 10.89 13.45 0.50 TOTAL FUND BALANCE 45.68 41.85 36.58 - 33.86 MID YEAR BUDGET REQUESTS – ALL FUNDS 277 RESOLUTION NO. 16- Attachment B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 BY RATIFYING THE ADEQUACY OF ESTIMATED AMENDED REVENUES TO THE GENERAL AND SPECIAL FUNDS TO COVER AMENDED APPROPRIATED MONIES AND APPROPRIATING MONIES THEREFROM FOR SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES AND ACCOUNTS WHEREAS, the orderly administration of municipal government is dependent on the establishment of a sound fiscal policy of maintaining a proper ratio of expenditures within anticipated revenues and available monies; and WHEREAS, the extent of any project or program and the degree of its accomplishment, as well as the efficiency of performing assigned duties and responsibilities, is likewise dependent on the monies made available for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has submitted his estimates of amended anticipated revenues, has determined that estimated amended revenues are adequate to cover amended appropriations, and has recommended the allocation of monies for specified program activities NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby ratify that the attached anticipated amended resources are to be received in the General and Special Funds listed in the attachment during fiscal year 2015-16 and that such resources are sufficient to cover the attached amended appropriations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there is appropriated from the General and special funds the sum of money set forth as amended expenditures for those funds, to be used for the purposes as expressed and estimated in the report before the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this1st day of March 2016, by the following vote: 278 Page 2 Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Barry Chang, Mayor, City of Cupertino 279 280 Accounting Staff by Size of GF Budget Attachment C City FY2015-16 GF Budget FY2015-16 Total Budget Sr/Supv Accountant Accountant Acct Tech Account Clerk Total Accounting Staff Ratio of GF Budget to Staff (millions) Ratio of Total Budget to Staff (millions) San Jose 1,215,409,515 3,815,638,049 13.0 14.0 9.0 21.0 57.0 21.3 66.9 Sunnyvale 243,599,681 355,826,448 1.0 5.0 13.0 - 19.0 12.8 18.7 Santa Clara 184,992,229 720,203,772 3.0 5.5 6.6 0.7 15.8 11.7 45.7 Fremont 172,623,000 287,696,000 3.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 12.0 14.4 24.0 Palo Alto 162,960,152 457,020,459 4.0 5.0 3.0 8.5 20.5 7.9 22.3 Cupertino 67,575,053 118,565,638 1.0 - 1.0 2.0 4.0 16.9 29.6 Gilroy 47,990,486 133,962,146 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 10.0 4.8 13.4 Campbell 42,835,126 64,169,672 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 8.6 12.8 Los Gatos 37,876,373 54,650,135 0.5 1.0 3.4 - 4.9 7.7 11.2 Morgan Hill 34,606,402 127,213,917 - 2.0 1.0 4.0 7.0 4.9 18.2 Saratoga 18,597,647 39,383,052 0.5 0.9 3.0 - 4.4 4.2 9.0 Los Altos Hills 7,108,000 13,841,000 0.5 - 1.0 - 1.5 4.7 9.2 281 Accounting Staff Burden Ratio by GF Budget Attachment D City FY2015-16 GF Budget FY2015-16 Total Budget Sr/Supv Accountant Accountant Acct Tech Account Clerk Total Accounting Staff Ratio of GF Budget to Staff (millions) Ratio of Total Budget to Staff (millions) San Jose 1,215,409,515 3,815,638,049 13.0 14.0 9.0 21.0 57.0 21.3 66.9 Cupertino 67,575,053 118,565,638 1.0 - 1.0 2.0 4.0 16.9 29.6 Fremont 172,623,000 287,696,000 3.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 12.0 14.4 24.0 Sunnyvale 243,599,681 355,826,448 1.0 5.0 13.0 - 19.0 12.8 18.7 Santa Clara 184,992,229 720,203,772 3.0 5.5 6.6 0.7 15.8 11.7 45.7 Campbell 42,835,126 64,169,672 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 8.6 12.8 Palo Alto 162,960,152 457,020,459 4.0 5.0 3.0 8.5 20.5 7.9 22.3 Los Gatos 37,876,373 54,650,135 0.5 1.0 3.4 - 4.9 7.7 11.2 Morgan Hill 34,606,402 127,213,917 - 2.0 1.0 4.0 7.0 4.9 18.2 Gilroy 47,990,486 133,962,146 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 10.0 4.8 13.4 Los Altos Hills 7,108,000 13,841,000 0.5 - 1.0 - 1.5 4.7 9.2 Saratoga 18,597,647 39,383,052 0.5 0.9 3.0 - 4.4 4.2 9.0 282 Accounting Staff Burden Ratio by Total Budget Attachment E City FY2015-16 GF Budget FY2015-16 Total Budget Sr/Supv Accountant Accountant Acct Tech Account Clerk Total Accounting Staff Ratio of GF Budget to Staff (millions) Ratio of Total Budget to Staff (millions) San Jose 1,215,409,515 3,815,638,049 13.0 14.0 9.0 21.0 57.0 21.3 66.9 Santa Clara 184,992,229 720,203,772 3.0 5.5 6.6 0.7 15.8 11.7 45.7 Cupertino 67,575,053 118,565,638 1.0 - 1.0 2.0 4.0 16.9 29.6 Fremont 172,623,000 287,696,000 3.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 12.0 14.4 24.0 Palo Alto 162,960,152 457,020,459 4.0 5.0 3.0 8.5 20.5 7.9 22.3 Sunnyvale 243,599,681 355,826,448 1.0 5.0 13.0 - 19.0 12.8 18.7 Morgan Hill 34,606,402 127,213,917 - 2.0 1.0 4.0 7.0 4.9 18.2 Gilroy 47,990,486 133,962,146 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 10.0 4.8 13.4 Campbell 42,835,126 64,169,672 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 8.6 12.8 Los Gatos 37,876,373 54,650,135 0.5 1.0 3.4 - 4.9 7.7 11.2 Los Altos Hills 7,108,000 13,841,000 0.5 - 1.0 - 1.5 4.7 9.2 Saratoga 18,597,647 39,383,052 0.5 0.9 3.0 - 4.4 4.2 9.0 283 Administrative Services - Key Performance Measures by Division FINANCE GOAL Deploy tools to empower and boost the efficiency of our employees. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Allow our customers the ability to quickly and securely make payments using their devices. N/A 25% 25% Strategy Launch state-of-art online payment portal (cloud based). Measure Attain banking expansion with Wells Fargo. Track user experience in payment portal through user survey. Metric Positive customer experience surveys. # of payments processed via old system (online/in person ratio). # of payments processed in new system (online/in person ratio). 2015/16 Outcome Payment system implementation complete. Customer payment process simplified. Status Initial Meeting with Wells Fargo completed. No further progress as of 2nd quarter. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Employee dashboard to complete time cards, review leave balances, and initiate personal and benefit changes. N/A 100% N/A Strategy Launch Full-Service Employee portal. Measure New World Systems, time card entry purchased, implementation in- progress. User survey pre-and-post implementation to learn time savings, ease of use, change in capabilities. Metric Positive customer experience surveys. # of users, click through rate. HR/Admin services survey pre-and-post implementation to learn # of requests addressed in-person vs. new tool. 2015/16 Outcome New World Systems implementation complete. Employees trained and utilizing tool. Status Completed, all city users are trained on the portal. Training manual is available on the intranet and training videos are expected before fiscal year end. 284 Administrative Services - Key Performance Measures by Division FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop a City Telework policy that allows flexibility to work outside City offices in a productive and environmentally-beneficial manner. N/A 50% 50% Strategy Implement Telework policy and associated technology needs to enable remote working options for City employees. Measure Develop draft policy for review by Department Heads. Work with IT to determine and source technology needs. Pilot policy. Adjust where needed and deploy globally. Metric # of employees approved to participate. # of hours logged @ home. GHG and fuel savings cataloged. 2015/16 Outcome Build a flexible work arrangement that reduces commutes and associated emissions, benefits the employee, departments and customers by making more efficient use of staff time. Status 50% complete. Launched pilot program with policy in September. We will be surveying participants and their supervisors to get feedback on the program. If pilot was successful, anticipate a full roll out by fiscal year end. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Consistent hardware and software technology at each workstation for improved efficiencies. Conference rooms equipped consistently with same audio/video technology. N/A 75% 75% Strategy Establish standard departmental workstations and conference room set- up to expand technology access and user experience. Measure Standard established. User experience surveys administered pre-and- post deployment. Metric # of workstations upgraded. # of conference rooms upgraded. Positive user experience recorded and improvement recommendations prioritized. 2015/16 Outcome Employee productivity improved. Technology staff time reduced for workstation and conference room trouble-shooting. Status 75% Complete. All workstations in Administrative Services are utilizing the Virtual Desktop Integrator (VDI). Staff continues to test the speed of the system. VDI console also installed in conference room. 285 Administrative Services - Key Performance Measures by Division HUMAN RESOURCES GOAL Diversify employee training opportunities across all work classifications. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Explore internal opportunities for mentorship (mentee- driven). N/A +-10% +10% Strategy Offer web or computer- based supervisory trainings; intra-departmental mentorships and cross-trainings; explore personal and professional growth opportunities. Measure Send out surveys to learn employee training needs. Compile training rosters and offer evaluation forms to provide feedback. Metric Training needs survey received from all employees. Attendee satisfaction. Training roster attendance. 2015/16 Outcome Create training catalog/schedule Status In progress, anticipate training survey in early 2016. 286 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division SUSTAINABILITY GOAL Establish indicators for sustainability that will enable short and long-term Climate Action monitoring reporting and continuous improvement. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Each of Sustainability Division's programs has an effective data collection and management tool. Reporting on program metrics is simplified by having templates and data collection system in place. Each City department considers sustainability- related metrics for their projects. Hired staff to lead environmental and utilities tool development and staff engagement. Developing Clear Path tracking database for monitoring, tracking and measuring GHG data. Field checked parks, schools, and facilities water meters. Developed interim energy utility database to support enterprise software procurement . Strategy Lead data gathering, assessment and reporting of metrics of sustainability measures for the purpose of driving accountability and improvements across municipal operations and the community at large. Measure Reporting templates, open data platform. Metric Number of programs out of total for which an effective data collection and management tools has been found and is in use across all departments/divisions. 2015/16 Outcome Data for each program is efficiently collected and easily analyzed; results of programs are efficiently reported out to Council and community, and synched to open data platform. Status Entered GHG inventory data into Clear Path tracking tool. Organizing GHG reduction measures into actionable timeline for implementation. Completed ground-truthing of park, school, and facility water meters. Researched utility management software solutions and developed criteria to guide the procurement process over the next quarter. Piloted City Works asset management tool as a potential solution for GreenBiz program data. 287 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division GOAL Demonstrate technologies and municipal practices that promote sustainability both in the City’s own operations and in those of its suppliers. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop employee survey to assess needs and define use cases. Design and pilot procurement tool. Refine based upon feedback. Finalized update to 2008 green purchasing policy to drive this action inside and outside the organization. Hosting departmental trainings. Provided training @ departmental meetings on Green Purchasing Policy, User Guide and Cheat Sheet. Strategy Develop planning tools to enable comparative analysis of procurement decisions and to support long-term economic, environmental, and socially responsible decision-making. Measure Employee survey. Planning tools and user guide. Metric Number of employees using or inputting into the tool. Number of employees accessing the user guide. 2015/16 Outcome Survey administered to employees and baseline results calculated. Pilot users become power users and champions to other purchasing staff. Status Finalized updated Green Purchasing Policy and developed a User Guide and 1-page Cheat Sheet to support staff policy implementation. Delivered brief presentation on Green Purchasing Policy documents at Public Works and Planning Department meetings. Provided all staff with hard copies and online access to documents. Next phase, developing a tool to track usage/procurement efforts to ensure policy is truly implemented. 288 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division GOAL Build Cupertino as sustainability leader among comparable cities through innovative, cost-effective, resource-saving initiatives and partnerships. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter EPP and Demonstration internal policies finalized. Tracking tool and database developed and relevant staff trained on its use. Researching certification programs (e.g. STAR Communities) and awards (e.g. Beacon Award) to benchmark and/or recognize city sustainability leadership efforts and identify new environmental actions. City accepted into ILG’s Beacon Awards program, in which requires progress reports on industry BMPs to allow continual and evolutionary benchmarking of City activities. Strategy Continue and expand collaborative procurement, grant, technical assistance and fellowships efforts to grow programs and enable advanced technology acquisition Measure Updated Green Purchasing Policy, new Technology Demonstration Policy, tracking tools. Metric Policies and tracking tools developed. 2015/16 Outcome City staff has an approved IT-endorsed green purchasing policy and PW- endorsed technology demonstration policy with which to make decisions. Grant, award, technical/fellowship assistance database and tracking tool in place and utilize across relevant departments. Status To pursue acknowledgement of leading City sustainability efforts, Cupertino’s application was accepted for participation in the Institute for Local Government’s Beacon Award Program for 2016. Staff will be contributing activity data for possible award in late 2016. Council approved re- joining the Compact of Mayors, to increase recognition and accountability for sustainability programs nationally, in which staff will also be submitting progress in late 2016. GOAL Lead outreach to ensure that all community members acquire the knowledge, skills, and tools to meet current and future sustainability 289 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division challenges. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Development and roll out of resident and business surveys. Polling is forthcoming as part of the community survey and updated Cupertino green website. Exploring appropriate utilization of Peak Democracy, Town Hall tools and Community Based Social Marketing techniques for surveying and activating residents and businesses on CAP Measures. Strategy Elevate awareness of and participation in existing and pilot sustainability initiatives among residents and businesses, to advance ecological citizenship models. Measure Number of new surveying tools that produce meaningful or actionable results; program participation, satisfaction, retention. Metric How many people take the surveys; number/percent of people aware of each program/service/survey question. Number of program participants from baseline, over time. 2015/16 Outcome Have baseline idea of how knowledgeable residents and businesses are of programs, services, technologies. Produce list of discrepancies between services offered and results of community interest surveys. Initiate outreach campaign development. Status Researching other agency models for this type of exercise that are the most cost effective and achieve the highest response rate. Attended Community Based Social Marketing training to gather best practices, knowledge and insight into options for effective surveying of and engagement with residents and businesses on targeted CAP Measures. CITY CLERK 290 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division GOAL Streamline information processing for Council, staff, and public. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 50% of employees sign acknowledgement and answer questions successfully. Records Retention policy and procedures packet to be included in the new employee hiring package given out by HR and this PM will not be included in the next budget cycle for the City Clerk’s division. Records Retention Policy distributed to all employees and via email and new employee hiring package.. Strategy All employees receive Records Retention policy and procedures. Measure Clerk's office receives signed acknowledgement that employee received and reviewed policy and procedures. Also, employee will answer two questions about the policy and/or procedures. Metric Percentage of employees who sign acknowledgement and answer questions successfully. 2015/16 Outcome Success enabled by having simple, clear instructions and/or policies for records retention, formatting staff reports and attachments, and drafting agenda items in Legistar; training individuals on these instructions/policies; support from City Manager and Department Heads to respect packet deadlines. Status City Clerk’s office emailed the Records Retention Policy and Procedures packet to the Department Admins to forward to each employee in the department. As noted in 1st Quarter, Records Retention Policy and Procedures packet to be included in the new employee hiring package given out by HR. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 291 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division 75% of users sign acknowledgment City Clerk’s office will contact Department Admins and Commission staff liaisons to identify all employees who draft Council agenda items and/or create commission agendas. Alt. pathway to user agreement pursued: Relevant users identified and received written instructions. Clerk’s Office conducted/will continue to conduct trainings on Granicus Legistar/InSite. Strategy Identify employees who draft Council agenda items and/or create commission agendas and train them on Granicus Legistar/Insite. Measure Clerk's office receives signed acknowledgement from employee and trainer that instructions were received and employee was trained. Metric Percentage of users who sign acknowledgement. 2015/16 Outcome All users trained proficient in program. Status Employees who draft Council agenda items and/or create commission agendas have been identified. Users have received written instructions. The City Clerk’s office has trained the commission liaisons and Department Admins have trained users in their department on Granicus Legistar/InSite. The City Clerk’s office feels confident in the training without receiving a signed acknowledgment. The City Clerk’s office will continue to identify any new employees who need training on the software but will not require a written acknowledgment. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 50% of the time, each Dept. Head and City Manager will have Council agenda items approved and Clerk's office will have packet prepared by specified deadline. Departments are already aware of the agenda deadlines and PM will not be included in the next budget cycle Departments are already aware of the agenda deadlines. 292 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division for the City Clerk’s division. Strategy Final approval of Council agenda items by 4:00 p.m. on packet day. Clerk's office will post packet and send information to Council members no later than 6:30 p.m. on packet day. Measure Clerk's office will track when each department's Council agenda items were approved by the Dept. Head and City Manager. Metric Percentage of time each department's Council agenda items are approved and packet ready by specified deadline. 2015/16 Outcome All departments aware of and adhere to deadlines. Packets processed no later than 5pm on packet day. Status This Performance Measure strategy and outcome relies on the performance of other departments getting their agenda items in the system in a timely manner for the City Manager’s approval. Departments are already aware of the deadlines and the City Clerk’s office can only begin processing the packet once all agenda items are in the system and approved. This PM will not be included in the next budget cycle for the City Clerk’s division. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter NEW: 100% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. 100% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. 94% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline. Strategy Public Record Act requests responded to in a timely manner. Measure Public Record Act requests log “due date” column (including any “extension”) and “date fulfilled” column match. Metric Percentage of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. 2015/16 Outcome 100% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. Status 17 Public Record Act requests were logged for second quarter FY 2015-16 and 16 were responded to by the deadline date. The one request not responded to by the deadline date required 16 staff hours including outside counsel support. The request was responded to partially and was completed within a week. 293 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter NEW: 80% of City Council minutes for regular meetings presented for Council approval by the following regular meeting. 71% of minutes for regular Council meetings submitted for approval at the next regular Council meeting. 100% of minutes for regular Council meetings submitted for approval at the next regular Council meeting. Strategy City Council minutes prepared and presented for City Council approval in a timely manner. Measure Clerk’s office will track the date of each regular Council meeting and when the draft minutes were presented for approval. Metric Percentage of regular Council meeting minutes approved by the next regular Council meeting. 2015/16 Outcome 80% of minutes for regular Council meetings submitted for approval at the next regular Council meeting. Status Five regular Council meetings occurred in second quarter. Five sets of minutes for regular Council meetings were submitted for approval by the next regular meeting. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter NEW: 90% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 100% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 100% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of 294 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division final, signed documents. Strategy Adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances signed and scanned to Laserfiche in a timely manner. Measure Clerk’s office will track time it takes to process adopted resolutions and ordinances after a City Council meeting until the time they are scanned to Laserfiche. Metric Percentage of City Council adopted resolutions and ordinances signed and uploaded to Laserfiche for public viewing within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 2015/16 Outcome 100% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. Status 34 resolutions and three ordinances were adopted in first quarter and 100% were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 295 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division ADMINISTRATION GOAL Improve customer service experience and relationships. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Enhance website functions and usability/searchability. Enhance access to online documents. In progress In progress Strategy Provide the public and customers with the ability and tools to answer questions online resources. Measure Updated website with survey prompts. Track Comcate tickets/utilize services through alternative Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software if/when piloted. Metric Track number of website views, hits, and/or downloads. Survey responses. 2015/16 Outcome Customers are empowered to get the information and tools they are seeking easily to increase transparency and efficiency. Status Building website reorganized for better usability. Planning website reorganization in progress. City-wide website re-design in progress, but not complete. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop curriculum and presentations to achieve specific and targeted learning outcomes. Once administered, convert workshop content into online sessions to heighten information sharing and access. Create tools to enable text survey/polling. In progress Peak Democracy’s Open Town Hall utilized In progress Strategy Increase community outreach and education to foster greater awareness and build community knowledge of the planning and development process by organizing, hosting, and recording local training or informational workshops and presenting to relevant stakeholder groups. 296 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Measure Updated website with survey prompts. (Paper, Text, Online) Surveys provided to workshop attendees to gauge knowledge before and after session as well as satisfaction to information delivery. Metric Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software (if/when piloted by department) or community outreach tracking tool (excel) denoting # of workshops hosted, # of attendees, # of survey responses (text or CRM) on the quality/usefulness of materials presented. Number of page views/downloads of online community workshop videos. 2015/16 Outcome Online public education and public information (articles, tips, fact sheets) generate greater customer support and education and serve as a more efficient and effective community outreach. Increased connectivity between the public and department builds community engagement and trust, thereby enabling expanded community input from broader participants. Model effective private-sector customer engagement and interactions where applicable. Status Conducted Economic Development Strategic Business Plan Roundtable community meeting Vallco, The Oaks, and The Hamptons developers sponsored several community outreach meetings to provide information and gather public comments. Utilized Peak Democracy’s Open Town Hall as an online forum to engage the public for the General Plan Amendment. GOAL Build, Support, Sustain Workforce Performance Excellence. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Strengthen employee development opportunities to encourage professional growth and improvements and stronger understanding of processes within and among Department. Ongoing Ongoing Strategy Improve teamwork and employee satisfaction to foster stronger customer service experience. Measure Expand professional development opportunities to include training and career enrichment courses/seminars, cross training with other departments, special topics or learning from guest speakers /educators. Metric Track/schedule numbers of special sessions and topics each year. Employee survey responses. 2015/16 Outcome Professional development efforts build a cadre of better trained and efficient staff and improve the quality of public service. 297 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Status Planning Division staff attended annual California American Planning Association conference for continuing education and professional development. Building Division provided four Title 24 training sessions at Staff meetings. Building Division staff attended annual Calbo conference for continuing education and professional development. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Host department retreats/ work sessions (1/year), alt. dept. job shadowing, mentorship program with experts in the field. Improve Economic Dev. interface via quarterly updates. Ongoing In progress Ongoing Economic Development Manager attends Planning staff meeting on a quarterly basis to share updates Strategy Build inter/intra dept. relations to expand City staff support network required to enable successful operations/planning processes. Measure Quarterly/annual employee reviews, prioritize professional development discussions with supervisors. Staff/supervisors collaborate to develop professional development plans. Metric Track work sessions and retreats in professional development matrix/plan. Progress in achieving objectives and actions outlined in professional development plans. 2015/16 Outcome Grow relationships within divisions and across departments to take advantage of opportunities to learn, improve team partnership and grow greater work satisfaction, build a better trained and well-rounded staff, and improve quality of public service and customer satisfaction. Status Conducted annual employee reviews as they are due. Planning Division retreat on September 17, 2015 provided team building exercises and addressed challenges and solutions. Weekly work sessions for planners are conducted weekly following the division staff meeting. Economic Development Manager provides quarterly updates at Planning Division Staff meetings. 298 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division PLANNING GOAL Demystify the planning process. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Enable customer to access status of plan/development review through new online permitting system. In progress New permit system went live on Jan 11, 2016. Online public portal expected to go online in Spring 2016. Strategy Empower customers to get useful information and helpful tools easily online. Measure Updated website with survey prompts, Comcate tickets or alt. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software if/when piloted. Implement online permitting system to provide customer access to information. Metric Track # of website views, hits, and/or downloads. Customer satisfaction and user experience via survey responses. Track project development timelines prior to and after system implementation. 2015/16 Outcome Department increases transparency and efficiency through heightened public access and improves accountability and overall customer experience. Status Planning Division website reorganization in progress. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Team w/ dpts. to increase community outreach through new technologies. Build youth engagement by connecting regularly with Teen Commission, De Anza College, and High Schools student groups In progress Ongoing. Strategy Tap quiet majority of community members not currently participating in the planning, development, ordinance, or public hearing process. 299 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Measure Deploy new community engagement and/or Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tools. Expanded social media and pro-active vs. reactive planning-led outreach efforts. Metric Track website views, hits, and/or downloads. Customer satisfaction and user experience survey responses. 2015/16 Outcome Garner greater customer support and education to build and operationalize efficient and effective community outreach, strengthen community engagement and relations, and gain access to broader and more diverse community input. Status Utilized Peak Democracy’s Open Town Hall as an online forum to engage the public. Engaged the Teen Commissioners to provide ideas and comments for the General Plan Amendment. Conducted WELO community outreach meeting on February 1, 2016, with Sustainability Division. GOAL Expand outreach to the business community to surface and address business needs through available and future City services. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Engagement strategy drafted and includes,: visiting companies, retail businesses, meeting with Chamber leadership, participating in local/regional business organizations, attending networking events, meeting with real estate brokers and property managers. In progress Ongoing Econ Dev Manager continues to host monthly Women’s Networking Mixers (average attendance is 25). Economic Development supported and hosted the Silicon Valley StartUp Cup entrepreneurship competition. Strategy Develop business engagement strategy, targets, timeline, milestones and tracking tool. Evaluate lessons learned to integrate into future performance measures and work program. Measure Feedback tool developed to learn experiences of businesses to date and assess future informational and service needs. Tracking tool developed to 300 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division record # of site visits, meetings, functions, etc. Metric Quantity of meetings. Business experience survey results. 2015/16 Outcome Increase business relations with the City, evaluate existing business services, define new business support resources, and generate new business to business partnerships. Status Assistant City Manager, Economic Development Manager and Senior Housing Planner regularly attend the Legislative Action Committee, Chamber of Commerce meetings, Rotary meetings, Santa Clara County Association of Planning Official meetings. Economic Development Manager hosted Women’s Networking Workshop. GOAL Improve City economy, vitality, sustainability, and economic diversity. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop curriculum and presentations to achieve specific and targeted learning outcomes. Once administered, convert workshop content into online sessions to heighten information sharing and access. Create tools to enable text survey/polling. In development Ongoing Conducted community and business outreach meetings as part of EDSP process. Completed and presented the background/current conditions report to City Council. Continue to meet with prospective businesses interested in Cupertino. Strategy Running in parallel to and informed by the in-progress Economic Development Strategic Plan, create a customized suite of support resources for businesses, emphasizing small businesses. Measure Host, sponsor and co-sponsor workshops and training events. Provide online. Surveys provided to workshop attendees to gauge knowledge before and after session as well as satisfaction to information delivery. Metric Community outreach tracking tool (excel) denoting # of workshops hosted, # of attendees, # of survey responses (text or CRM) on the quality/usefulness of 301 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division materials presented. Number of page views/downloads of online community workshop videos. 2015/16 Outcome Amplify suite of services offered to small local businesses to better enable their ongoing success and ensure their long-term viability in our community. Status In development GOAL Improve outreach and information sharing targeting internal staff and the public to create greater connectivity with our business base. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Map current connection points between staff, electeds, the broader public, and our local businesses including, but not limited to: BizBuzz electronic newsletter, "How to Start a Business in Cupertino" Guide, Items of Interest, Council Work Program, Scene Articles, website. Ongoing Ongoing Economic Development utilizing Constant Contact service for its BizBuzz newsletter. Translated “Welcome to Cupertino” and Demographics handouts into Chinese. Strategy Increase internal and external outreach channels and resources to increase community knowledge of and orientation towards local business services, activities, products. Measure Inventory current informational materials and resources. Learn "user" experience through surveys, page views, downloads, inquiries logged through Comcate or other Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tool. Consider tools to track how this information is generating "leads" or driving customers to local businesses. Metric Quantity of page views, downloads, positive survey, customer experiences, information to customer conversions. 2015/16 Outcome Identify informational gaps and embed plan to address in Strategic Plan. Develop tool to track how City resources lead to greater local business support/sales. Status Updates and information published regularly in BizBuzz, Items of Interest, Cupertino Scene and on the website. 302 Law Enforcement - Key Performance Measures by Division 20 LAW ENFORCEMENT GOAL Maintain adequate Sheriff response times to citizen calls. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Per Contract Priority One: 5 minutes Priority Two: 9 minutes Priority Three: 20 minutes N/A Exceeding expectations Continuing to exceed expectations Strategy Monitor average response time for emergency calls Measure Priority One: Respond within 5 minutes Priority Two: Respond within 9 minutes Priority Three: Respond within 20 minutes Metric Logged in Public Safety Report 2015/16 Outcome Priority One: Response 3.54 minutes Priority Two: Response 6.55 minutes Priority Three: Response 11.26 minutes Status Priority One 1st Quarter: July - 2.99 / Aug – 3.52 / Sept – 3.86 Priority One 2nd Quarter: Oct – 1.57 / Nov – 4.93 / Dec – 4.35 Priority Two 1st Quarter: July - 6.80 /Aug – 6.10 / Sept – 7.06 Priority Two 2nd Quarter: Oct – 6.27 / Nov – 6.57 / Dec – 6.48 Priority Three 1st Quarter: July – 11.10 / Aug- 11.35 / Sept – 11.02 Priority Three 2nd Quarter: Oct – 10.35 / Nov – 12.65 / Dec – 11.04 GOAL Provide crime prevention efforts through public interaction and education. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 3 N/A Started Fall Academy Completed Fall Academy Strategy Conduct Teen Academy classes. Measure Number of Teen Academy classes held. 303 Law Enforcement - Key Performance Measures by Division 21 Metric 2015/16 Outcome 2 Status The Fall Teen Academy runs from 9/29-12/17/15. There will be 12 sessions with 22 students participating. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 25 N/A 11 14 Strategy Conduct Code Red training and drills. Measure Number of training/drills held. Metric 2015/16 Outcome 21 Status 21 Schools are currently scheduled for the Run, Hide, Defend trainings and lock down drills. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1 N/A No meetings scheduled 3 meetings attended Strategy Conduct "Every 15 Minutes" program. Measure Number of presentations held. Metric 2015/16 Outcome 1 Status “Every 15 minutes” is currently scheduled to be held at Homestead High School in April 2016 304 Law Enforcement - Key Performance Measures by Division 22 FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 9 N/A One meeting attended Six meetings attended Strategy Conduct school attendance review board (SARB) meetings for Cupertino Unified School District and DA Mediation for the Fremont Union High School District. Measure Number of meetings held. Metric 2015/16 Outcome 1 SARB in the first quarter and 3 SARB/ 3 DA Mediation meetings in the second quarter. Status Seven meetings conducted through December which conform to school year. 305 Public Affairs - Key Performance Measures by Division 23 ADMINISTRATION GOAL Provide superior customer service both in-house and public-facing. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Customer satisfaction survey ratings of good to excellent. N/A Annual Annual Strategy Develop customer service best practice guide and host training to institutionalize practices. Measure Customer satisfaction index based upon user satisfaction and number of cases reported. Metric Use Access Cupertino and user surveys to assess community satisfaction. 2015/16 Outcome Satisfied customers as indicated by high internal and end-user ratings. Ratings included in employee performance evaluations. Status Survey conducted annually. New Survey planned for 4th Quarter. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase rate of online utilization by 10% over previous year. Number of users accessing City information through each channel. 2014 Jul 2,270 Oct 7.8% Increase 2,426 Dec 15.3% Increase Strategy Strive for innovation in customer service approaches. Build in-house experts to serve diverse customer needs. Measure Be an adaptive organization and act as facilitators, enablers, and experts on technology and communications to provide customers and end-users relevant access to City information. Metric Utilize monthly social media and web usage statistics to determine access to City information. Utilize intranet statistics and Google Analytics. 2015/16 Outcome Deploy widely used and growing variety of differentiated online services. Status Continuing to promote and expand use of social media. 306 Public Affairs - Key Performance Measures by Division 24 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOAL Build an IT strategic plan to serve as a management tool, guide decision making, and prioritize staffing. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Actionable plan developed, all staff engaged in its implementation, resources adequately aligned to achieve plan goals. N/A Initial document complete Matrix of IT priorities documented Strategy Hire third-party consultant to survey staff needs, assess technology gaps and develop an implementation plan. Measure Plan developed. Technology projects listed. Tracking tool implemented. Metric Number of completed technology projects. Inventory and status of technology services. 2015/16 Outcome Formally adopt IT strategic plan. Status Consultant provided document. First staff governance meeting held. Recruitment for CTO in process. COMMUNICATIONS GOAL Develop a Communications strategic plan to guide organizational outreach priorities and associated staffing. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Actionable plan developed, all staff engaged in roll-out, resources adequately aligned to achieve plan goals. N/A Communication assessment complete Action plan being implemented Strategy Explore consultant options to survey community and staff needs, assess media gaps, implementation plan to address those needs and gaps. Measure Plan developed. Needs and gaps identified. Communications projects listed. Tracking tool implemented. Metric Number of current and prospective communication projects. Inventory of communication services. 307 Public Affairs - Key Performance Measures by Division 25 2015/16 Outcome Formally adopt strategic plan. Status Communications assessment complete. Action plan being implemented. Studies complete. Priority established and citywide communication meetings have commenced. GIS GOAL Assist community in visualizing and transforming geographic data into usable information. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Actionable plan developed, all staff engaged in roll- out, resources adequately aligned to achieve plan goals. N/A N/A N/A RFP Strategy Provide high-quality geospatial data, application development and expertise to the City of Cupertino staff and general public. Measure Utilize website to track visits to the home page, Open Data, map/app gallery and MapGuide/Magnet. Metric Track the number of requests for assistance in general GIS, mapping requests, data request and Cityworks. 2015/16 Outcome Formally adopt strategic plan. Status Monitoring requests for assistance. 308 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 26 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS GOAL Clean creeks in Cupertino. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) One business day response to illegal discharge to creeks 2) Conduct minimum of 14 creek cleanup events annually 3) Receive no negative actions from enforcement agencies 100% New measure New measure 100% 4/14 complete None received 100% 8/14 Complete None received Strategy Prevent to the maximum extent practicable items other than rain water from entering the storm water system. Measure 1) Respond to reported discharge event within one business day. 2) Annual cleanups 3) Quantify actions from enforcement agencies. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time or time after call or email is received. 2) Quantification of the number of Annual Clean Up Events 3) Quantification of negative actions received from enforcement agencies. 2015/16 Outcome Achieve stormwater compliance requirements, ensure healthy protected water system. Status Ongoing with additional efforts to increase community involvement. GOAL Provide efficient and effective recycling, organic and disposal services. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Develop organics ordinance. Define data needs and assess tracking tools available (i.e. EPA ReTRAC). 2) Implement organic diversion requirements to affected businesses New measure New measure Complete Completed for Businesses Provide Ongoing support and education for businesses implementing the ordinance. 309 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 27 generating > 8cy of organic waste - Sept. 2015 Completed for Businesses generating > 3cy of organic waste or 25% of total waste stream comprised of organics – Jan 20, 2016 Strategy Divert materials from landfill through expanded recycling and organic policies and services, paired with effective outreach campaigns to increase residential and commercial participation. Measure Monthly diversion reporting from solid waste franchisee and annual CalRecyle diversion rate equivalent (DRE) calculation. Metric Achieve 75% (DRE) diversion, 60% commercial & multifamily diversion. Customer service satisfaction (Godbe Survey). 2015/16 Outcome Adopt organics ordinance and utilize data collection to track progress. Status Ongoing DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GOAL Provide timely development review and permitting services. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 2 week response 90% of time Strategy Review and permit private development in a timely and consistent manner in accordance with applicable codes, standards and policies. Measure Respond to complete plan submittals or applications within 2 weeks Metric Track response times using Development Tracking System (not yet implemented) 2015/16 Outcome Strengthened partnership with Community Development. Clear roles and timelines defined. Customer experience improved. Status Development Tracking System was implemented in January 2016. Staff are currently gathering data and will be able to provide updates in the near future. 310 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 28 CIP ADMINISTRATION GOAL Deliver Capital Projects on time and within budget. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter On time and within budget 80% of time. 10/12 (83%) Strategy Meet published commitments to Council and community in an effective, timely, and quality manner. Measure Project and/or budget management software or alternative tracking tool to enable better accountability of costs, expenses and revenues related to a project. Metric Timeline and budget variances for each project and tracked for program over time. 2015/16 Outcome Deliver project within budget and achieve beneficial occupancy within one month of projected completion date at time of award. Status Measurements methods under development. STREETS GOAL Safe street markings, legends and signs for motorist, cyclists, and pedestrians. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) One business day response to reported unsafe conditions. 100% 100% Strategy Appropriately placed street markings, legends and signs benefit motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. Measure 1) Respond to street marking, legend and sign issues within 3 business days Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2) CityWorks software 2015/16 Outcome 2015 & 16 paving projects have had scope of work increased to include safe street marking and legend work on both streets scheduled and not scheduled for pavement improvement. 311 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 29 Status Ongoing GOAL No viewable graffiti within Cupertino. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Remove 100% of known graffiti on public City property within 2 business days 100% 100% Strategy Remove graffiti before more tagging occurs. Measure Clean up within 2 business days of call. Metric Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Community aesthetic maintained. Status Ongoing. Coordination required as needed when graffiti occurs on Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) or Caltrans property. GOAL Maintain reliable storm drain system. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond to reported storm drain system deficiencies within one business day 100% 100% Strategy Efficiently inspected and maintained storm drain system assists in minimizing the potential for localized flooding. Measure 1) Respond to reported storm drain system deficiencies within 24 business hours. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 312 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 30 2015/16 Outcome Ongoing Status Collection system cleaning / videoing of hot spot areas completed in November ’15. Installation of three manhole monitoring systems to be complete in February ’16. GOAL Effectively maintain streetlight network. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond to reported streetlight outages within 2 business days 2) Resolve issues with City owned streetlights within 5 business days. 100% 100% 100% Strategy Repair streetlights in a timely manner. Measure 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback 2) CityWorks software Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Reliable streetlight network that promotes community safety. Status Ongoing GOAL Citywide street network pavement condition index (PCI) of 80 by 2019; no street below 30 for two consecutive years. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 313 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 31 1) Network PCI of 80 by FY19/20. 2) No individual street PCI <30 for two consecutive years. Network PCI = 70 3.8% of network <PCI of 30 Network PCI = 70 3.8% of network <PCI of 30 Strategy Well maintained streets conserve resources, promote commerce and promote community safety. Measure 1) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) StreetSaver reports. Metric 1) Sufficient operating budget recommended and approved. 2) Annual pavement condition report as calculated by StreetSaver and submitted to the MTC. 2015/16 Outcome Street network PCI is calculated to be 72 and approximately 4 miles of streets will have a PCI <30 at the end of 2016. Status Network PCI is calculated to improve from a current value of 70 to 72. Continued improvement is conditional to future budget appropriation. GOAL Safe pedestrian pathways FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond and mitigate reported pathway deficiencies within 1 business day. 100% 100% 100% Strategy Maintain sidewalks, curb and gutter to a standard that minimizes liability. Measure 1) Respond and mitigate pathway deficiencies within 1 business day. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Safer pedestrian pathways mitigate potential issues and support citizen's quality of life. Status Ongoing TREES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY 314 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division 32 GOAL Healthy and expanding urban forest. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond to reported safety issues with 1 business day 2) Inspect and maintain all street trees and park trees within 5 year cycle. 3) Plant more trees than removed. 100% New Measure 100% New Measure 100% 1804 Trees maintained and inspected 142 Trees Planted, 31 Trees Removed Strategy Maintain urban forest to ISA standards that minimize liability, improve and/or maintain tree values. Measure 1) Respond and mitigate safety issues within one business day. 2) Inspect and maintain all street trees and park trees within 5 year cycle. 3) Number of trees planted compared to number of trees removed. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2) CityWorks software. 2015/16 Outcome Urban canopy expanded, protected, serviced. Safety issues mitigated. Status FY15/16 is the last year of a 4 year program to plant 1600 trees citywide. 315 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 33 ADMINISTRATION GOAL Develop a healthy, positive and connected team. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 100% of priorities complete by June 30, 2016. N/A On Track On track Strategy Identify Department priorities for FY 15/16 and form sub-committees to work on each goal. Measure Priorities list developed, readily accessed and tracked by each implementing program. Metric Percentage of priorities completed by December 2015 and June 2016. 2015/16 Outcome Improved technology, marketing and customer service levels. Status Perfect Mind contract signed. New Business & Community Services Division rollout in May 2016 addresses the above. All 2015 goals in process or completed. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Benchmark current inner departmental communications tools and develop a priority list of expansion opportunities. Deploy tools to improve RCS staff knowledge of ongoing and prior successes. N/A On Track On track Strategy Establish a department newsletter denoting quarterly accomplishments and items of interest. McClellan Ranch quarterly newsletter implemented. Measure Survey staff at departmental meetings to evaluate experience and gauge awareness of colleague's projects. Metric Increase awareness of City and department issues and projects by 10%. 2015/16 Outcome Enhanced communication of department projects and accomplishments. Status Monthly department meetings have been implemented as well as a quarterly newsletter. Utilizing items of interest to increase awareness of department projects and accomplishments. Monthly meetings implemented with senior management and Public Works. 316 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 34 FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increased participation in cross-division events by 25%. N/A On Track On track Strategy Establish monthly department wide meetings to team build, communicate subcommittee milestones and organization issues/successes. Measure Meetings convened, hosted, tracked. Information shared with all departmental members. Metric Percentage of participation at meetings and department events. 2015/16 Outcome Strong cohesive team developed to expand partnerships and elevate customer services and experience. Status Monthly Department meetings implemented achieving 90% participation. Sub-committees established for technology, customer service and marketing and facility use policies FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 100% participation in annual training for all full- time staff. Annual enhancement of customer service modules for all part- time staff during in-service training. N/A On Track On track Strategy Place high priority on training and encourage expanded professional development opportunities for staff. Measure Percentage of participation in annual training courses, communicating new ideas, program concepts and service delivery tips via internal communications cataloging /project management tool. Track customer service experience before/following implementation via online, in-class surveys, Comcate. Metric Quantity of courses offered, participant attendance. Tool to foster greater team dialog and brainstorming explored. Positive customer experiences recorded. 2015/16 Outcome Customer service experience improved. Customer service modules available online and shared with all departments to ensure consistency. Status All staff required to attend skill enhancement training. On track for 100% compliance. Staff “reports out” to full department what they learned at monthly meetings. Annual department workshop off-site scheduled for June 2016 317 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 35 GOAL Increase use of technology to facilitate efficiency, expand marketing and bolster customer experience. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Registration available at any facility 100% of the time. Participant feedback readily available. N/A Pending Perfect Mind Software Installation Pending Perfect Mind Software installation Strategy Implement a new registration system department-wide. Measure Development of methods to register and obtain customer feedback electronically using internet and smart devices. Metric Quantity and quality of customer feedback received prior to and following system deployment 2015/16 Outcome Improved employee efficiency and productivity. Customer experience improved and access to information enabled. Status Contract signed 1/31/16. Staff has proposed new procedures to streamline facility rental process. Perfect Mind discovery process to start within 30-60 days. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 10% increase in social media outreach. N/A On Track On track Strategy Effective use of social media marketing for classes and events. Measure Development of methods to notify customers via social media. Metric List of methods currently used. List of new approaches. Project management schedule and timeline to implement methods. 2015/16 Outcome Strengthen partnership with Communications Department to develop an outreach plan for RCS that defines effective messaging, civic media assets, roles, timelines, and responsibilities. Status -Marketing seminar attended in September 2015 -Target marketing media identified -Pilot program anticipated for Big Bunny 5K/Fun Run -Implementation of Perfect Mind will enhance capabilities as well as establishment of Business division in May 2016. 318 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 36 FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Scala screen Installation at four facilities with weekly program information. N/A On Track On track Strategy Install Scala monitors in each facility with program specific content for the facility and then the department. Measure Development of marketing information for each site and department wide. Metric Inventory of information to share. Timeline to implement system. 2015/16 Outcome Expanded customer access to information on programs and services on a facility-by-facility basis. Status Scala screens now installed at Quinlan, Senior Center and Sports Center. Environmental Educ Center at McClellan is pending. City Channel to schedule training with staff. PARK PLANNING AND RESTORATION GOAL Pursue new parks and improvements to existing parks, guided by community input. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Corridor Master Plan report delivered by Spring 2016. Incorporate user comments into programming. N/A On Track On track Strategy Facilitate a Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Ranch Road Corridor Master Plan. Measure Solicit community input through a wide number of outreach events including public meetings, web site outreach, surveys and stakeholder interviews. Metric Online survey participation, post card mailing, social media/civic engagement tool tracking. 2015/16 Outcome Provide a 20 Year master plan for the BBF Golf Course, BBF Swim & Picnic facility, Stevens Creek Trail and McClellan Ranch Preserve (Environmental Education Center/Blacksmith Shop/Barn, etc.) Consultant, M.I.G., is in process of completing report. Golf Course component complete by National Golf Foundation (NGF). Status Report is scheduled for Parks & Recreation Commission in March 2016 and City Council in May 2016. 319 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 37 FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter City wide Park Master Plan report delivered by February 2017. Incorporate user comments into programming. N/A On Track On track Strategy Facilitate a City Wide Park Open Space and Recreation Master Plan. Measure Solicit community input through a wide number of outreach events including public meetings, web site outreach, surveys and stakeholder interviews. Metric Online survey, , social media/civic engagement tool tracking, public meetings. 2015/16 Outcome Provide a 20 year Park, Open Space and Recreation Master Plan to improve customer service experience. Status Contract awarded to RHAA. Work began October 2015. Website and on- line survey rollout February 2016. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Lawrence Mitty - Complete appraisals & soils testing; negotiate property acquisition; annex property, apply for grant funding by 12/2016. Main Street - Review and recommend modifications by 5/2015. N/A N/A On Track Complete On track Strategy Pursue the acquisition of parks and trails on the east side of Cupertino. Measure Identify and carry out the steps to acquire the County Roads and Airport property known as the Lawrence Mitty Linear parcel; Review the Main Street Park Plan and facilitate Park and Recreation Commission and City Council review and approval. Metric Project management timeline developed, milestones achieved. Budget prepared and achieved. 2015/16 Outcome Expand park assets and associated community benefits citywide. Status Lawrence Mitty – appraisals done. Soil testing scheduled for early 2016. Main Street park design revised and approved by Parks & Recreation Commission and Council. Construction pending. 320 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 38 FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY EVENTS GOAL Upgrade the Quinlan Community Center to increase usage and revenue generation from the facility. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Reduce energy costs by 10%. Reduce maintenance time by 10%; Enhancements complete by 12/2015. N/A On Track Completed Strategy Complete the Quinlan Community Center Upgrade project: energy efficient lighting, facility upgrades. Measure Replace lighting fixtures. Replace flooring for more efficient maintenance. Paint all public spaces and remodel front office. Metric Pre-and-post site energy use tracked. Project timeline and milestones tracked. 2015/16 Outcome Facility energy use and aesthetics improved. Status Quinlan Community Center remodel complete; interior painting and New lighting in Cupertino Room complete. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase facility rentals by 5%. N/A On Track On track Strategy Utilize new marketing materials for promotion of the Center. Measure Prepare new marketing materials: virtual tours, marketing brochures, marketing binders, social media announcements. Metric Online user surveys. Site access/click-throughs. 2015/16 Outcome Additional revenue generated through increased program enrollment. 321 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 39 Status New Business Division will be addressing after May 2016. Facility use policy being revised with goals for easier registration process for customers. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase facility rentals by 5%. N/A On Track On track Strategy Book multiple rentals per day if possible. Measure Implement scheduling software. Metric Bookings pre-and-post deployment. 2015/16 Outcome Additional revenue generated through increased space programming. Status New Business Division will be address with installation of Perfect Mind reservation system and new facility use policy. 322 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 40 GOAL Implement creative solutions at Blackberry Farm to improve the customer service experience while complying with new bus restrictions into the complex. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase revenue by 10%. N/A Complete Strategy Expand pool and picnic programs for the summer season. Measure Outline current programs and services. Evaluate expansion opportunities based upon resident surveys, assessment of adjacent city municipal services. Metric Survey results. Service gap analysis. Programs proposed. 2015/16 Outcome Expand services and resultant revenues through: pool party packages; catering packages; water aerobic classes, etc. Status 1-Staff will be pursuing expanded programming in conjunction with Foot Golf groups. 2-For the 2015 season, revenue increased by 13.4% or $35,514 compared to 2014. This increase was primarily in the areas of swimming and café sales. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Maintain status quo re: number of field trips and not loose patrons. N/A Complete Strategy Educate patrons on transportation options and provide acceptable customer service alternatives to bussing children into BBF. Measure Evaluate current site transportation services and alternatives via survey. Meet off-site busses with carts to carry in their coolers and supplies. Metric Service summary developed. Alternatives proposed. Traffic mitigations recommended. Informational materials developed. Survey results recorded. 2015/16 Outcome Mitigate site traffic impacts and create a more pleasant guest experience. Status The efforts listed have been implemented, however, due to the inconvenience of walking small children into the facility and other factors beyond our control, several groups will not be using the facility next year. 323 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 41 YOUTH AND TEEN PROGRAMS GOAL Grow a healthy community by evaluating opportunities to expand community participation in programs and facilitate greater access to services, facilities and parks across all demographics. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Adjust weekend hours at the Teen Center to provide more opportunities for private events and increase rental revenue by 20%. N/A On Track Objective Accomplished Strategy Adjust current Teen Center operational hours to increase rental periods. Measure Teen Center rental revenue monitored and managed via facility rental software. Metric Yearly rental revenue reviewed and compared to previous yearly revenue reports. 2015/16 Outcome Rental opportunities and facility options expanded for community and revenue from facility rentals increased. Status Currently a 66% increase in rentals. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase number of Teen/Adult Art, S.T.E.M., nature programs by adding at least 2 new contractors to support student demands. Review opportunities and requirements to expand preschool program. N/A On Track On Track Strategy Consult with current contract instructors to explore additional service offerings and expand classes for teens and adults. Acquire feedback from target population on desired programming, including expanded preschool. Measure Registration software reports including returning students; Class satisfaction surveys administered to participants of all new and existing programs, including requests for new or expanded services. 324 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 42 Metric Participant and revenue totals measured against figures before new program deployment. Customer feedback would be reviewed through survey results detailing participant satisfaction. 2015/16 Outcome Teen and Adult recreational class selections expanded for community. Revenue for Teen/Adult classes increased. Preschool program has clearly defined expansion pathway. Status Teen S.T.E.M.-youth start-up expanded their offerings. Includes two new computer coding camps and quarterly afterschool web design class. New contractor, Clinton Brownley, will offering youth and teen programs and data analysis programs in Winter. May offer adult programs in future. Nature Classes—New instructor, Charlie Kennard, will be teaching a Twined Tule and basket making class geared for teens and adults (13+) this Winter. Cait Hutnik will be teaching a Lichen class for all ages. Adult Art—Mobile Art Academy added as instructor last Spring; Offering youth camps and quarterly adult classes. Two youth camps were full this summer, while adult classes have been slow to gain momentum. Additional classes being offered for Teen and Adults: 3D Modeling and Sculpturing and e-book Creation. Also added a computer coding class: Heads Up Hands down Android Development. SPORTS AND FITNESS GOAL Offer Sports Center programs targeted at school age groups in order to entice more families to join the Center. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 5% increase in family memberships N/A On Track Strategy Expand memberships through expanded services desired by the community. Measure Survey members to identify needs and the broader public to identify service gaps. Evaluate programs to find gaps in programming for these age groups. Metric Survey results. Service gap analysis. Programming proposals. 2015/16 Outcome Age appropriate programming developed to provide family opportunities such as kids’ club and parents’ night out. Status Implemented Kids Club and Parents Night Out. Restriped gym floor for multi-sport programming. 325 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 43 GOAL Provide a fun and memorable recreational experience for families at the 2016 Big Bunny 5K. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 10% increase in participation N/A On Track Curently falling short. Strategy Investigate different online survey options to increase awareness and identify improvements for the event. Measure Develop appropriate program modifications to improve family experience. Survey prior to and following implementation. Metric Survey results. 2015/16 Outcome Big Bunny fun run receives positive press, user-generated social media accolades. Participation grows year after year. Status Coordinated with CEEF 5K and Super Heroes 5K for shared and targeted marketing. Implementing new amenities at events to improve experience. To date, enrollment numbers are down by 20% compared to 2015. Ongoing marketing strategies are being utilized. GOAL Introduce foot golf at the BBF golf course. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 8% increase in participation. N/A Complete Strategy Target participation at BBF golf course to those who don't currently use the facility (i.e. after school youth league). Measure Develop list of groups currently using site. Develop list of prospective users. Outreach to all. Track site use prior to and following outreach. Track outreach channels. Metric Site use. Outreach metrics - number of messages developed, shared; click-throughs. 2015/16 Outcome Expand partnerships with youth and adult groups (AYSO, Apple, etc.) to market programs. Customer notification of specials, events, shared via social media. Status Foot Golf Kick-off on 7/4/15. Chamber promotion currently underway for October/November 2015. AYSO promotion planned for November/December. 326 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division 44 SENIOR PROGRAMS GOAL Expand membership and existing member satisfaction. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Complete marketing plan and develop surveying and tracking tools. N/A On Track On Track Strategy Using effective outreach strategies, informed by the departmental marketing plan, to grow membership by 2 percent per year. Measure Quantity of memberships and renewals measured; Number of membership referrals. Feedback received on services, programs, Center. Metric Number of memberships, renewals, referrals, positive feedback via surveys (online, Comcate, in-person), social media hits. 2015/16 Outcome Implement marketing plan and gather data on memberships, member satisfaction. Status Membership drive started October 26. We are trending 1% ahead in membership sales and 93% overall for customer satisfaction rating collected from program evaluations. 327 Administrative Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version FINANCE GOAL Deploy tools to empower and boost the efficiency of our employees. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Allow our customers the ability to quickly and securely make payments using their devices. N/A 25% 25% Strategy Launch state-of-art online payment portal (cloud based). Measure Attain banking expansion with Wells Fargo. Track user experience in payment portal through user survey. Metric Positive customer experience surveys. # of payments processed via old system (online/in person ratio). # of payments processed in new system (online/in person ratio). 2015/16 Outcome Payment system implementation complete. Customer payment process simplified. Status Initial Meeting with Wells Fargo completed. On target for fiscal year end implementation.No further progress as of 2nd quarter. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Employee dashboard to complete time cards, review leave balances, and initiate personal and benefit changes. N/A 100% N/A Strategy Launch Full-Service Employee portal. Measure New World Systems, time card entry purchased, implementation in- progress. User survey pre-and-post implementation to learn time savings, ease of use, change in capabilities. Metric Positive customer experience surveys. # of users, click through rate. HR/Admin services survey pre-and-post implementation to learn # of requests addressed in-person vs. new tool. 2015/16 Outcome New World Systems implementation complete. Employees trained and utilizing tool. 328 Administrative Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Status Completed, aAll cCity users are trained on the portal. Training manual is available on the intranet and training videos are expected before fiscal year end. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop a City Telework policy that allows flexibility to work outside City offices in a productive and environmentally-beneficial manner. N/A 50% 50% Strategy Implement Telework policy and associated technology needs to enable remote working options for City employees. Measure Develop draft policy for review by Department Heads. Work with IT to determine and source technology needs. Pilot policy. Adjust where needed and deploy globally. Metric # of employees approved to participate. # of hours logged @ home. GHG and fuel savings cataloged. 2015/16 Outcome Build a flexible work arrangement that reduces commutes and associated emissions, benefits the employee, departments and customers by making more efficient use of staff time. Status 50% complete. Launched pilot program with policy in September. We will be surveying participants and their supervisors to get feedback on the program. If pilot wasis successful, anticipate a full roll out by fiscal year end. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Consistent hardware and software technology at each workstation for improved efficiencies. Conference rooms equipped consistently with same audio/video technology. N/A 75% 75% Strategy Establish standard departmental workstations and conference room set- up to expand technology access and user experience. Measure Standard established. User experience surveys administered pre-and- post deployment. Metric # of workstations upgraded. # of conference rooms upgraded. Positive user experience recorded and improvement recommendations prioritized. 329 Administrative Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 2015/16 Outcome Employee productivity improved. Technology staff time reduced for workstation and conference room trouble-shooting. Status 75% Complete. All workstations in Administrative Services are utilizing the Virtual Desktop Integrator (VDI). Staff continues to test the speed of the system. VDI console also installed in conference room. HUMAN RESOURCES GOAL Diversify employee training opportunities across all work classifications. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Explore internal opportunities for mentorship (mentee- driven). N/A +-10% +10% Strategy Offer web or computer- based supervisory trainings; intra-departmental mentorships and cross-trainings; explore personal and professional growth opportunities. Measure Send out surveys to learn employee training needs. Compile training rosters and offer evaluation forms to provide feedback. Metric Training needs survey received from all employees. Attendee satisfaction. Training roster attendance. 2015/16 Outcome Create training catalog/schedule Status In progress, anticipate training survey in early 2016. 330 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version SUSTAINABILITY GOAL Establish indicators for sustainability that will enable short and long-term Climate Action monitoring reporting and continuous improvement. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Each of Sustainability Division's programs has an effective data collection and management tool. Reporting on program metrics is simplified by having templates and data collection system in place. Each City department considers sustainability- related metrics for their projects. Hired staff to lead environmental and utilities tool development and staff engagement. Developing Clear Path tracking database for monitoring, tracking and measuring GHG data. Field checked parks, schools, facilities water meters. Developed an interim energy utility database to support enterprise software procurement . Strategy Lead data gathering, assessment and reporting of metrics of sustainability measures for the purpose of driving accountability and improvements across municipal operations and the community at large. Measure Reporting templates, open data platform. Metric Number of programs out of total for which an effective data collection and management tools has been found and is in use across all departments/divisions. 2015/16 Outcome Data for each program is efficiently collected and easily analyzed; results of programs are efficiently reported out to Council and community, and synched to open data platform. Status Entered GHG inventory data into Clear Path tracking tool. Organizing GHG reduction measures into actionable timeline for implementation. Completed ground-truthing of park, school, and facility water meters. Researched utility management software solutions and developed criteria to guide the procurement process over the next quarter. Piloted City 331 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Works asset management tool as a potential solution for GreenBiz program data. GOAL Demonstrate technologies and municipal practices that promote sustainability both in the City’s own operations and in those of its suppliers. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop employee survey to assess needs and define use cases. Design and pilot procurement tool. Refine based upon feedback. Finalized update to 2008 green purchasing policy to drive this action inside and outside the organization. Hosting departmental trainings. Provided training @ departmental meetings on Green Purchasing Policy, User Guide and Cheat Sheet. Strategy Develop planning tools to enable comparative analysis of procurement decisions and to support long-term economic, environmental, and socially responsible decision-making. Measure Employee survey. Planning tools and user guide. Metric Number of employees using or inputting into the tool. Number of employees accessing the user guide. 2015/16 Outcome Survey administered to employees and baseline results calculated. Pilot users become power users and champions to other purchasing staff. Status Finalized updated Green Purchasing Policy and developed a User Guide and 1-page Cheat Sheet to support staff policy implementation. Delivered brief presentation on Green Purchasing Policy documents at Public Works and Planning Department meetings. Provided all staff with hard copies and online access to documents. Next phase, developing a tool to track usage/procurement efforts to ensure policy is truly implemented. 332 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version GOAL Build Cupertino as sustainability leader among comparable cities through innovative, cost-effective, resource-saving initiatives and partnerships. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter EPP and Demonstration internal policies finalized. Tracking tool and database developed and relevant staff trained on its use. Researching certification programs (e.g. STAR Communities) and awards (e.g. Beacon Award) to benchmark and/or recognize city sustainability leadership efforts and identify new environmental actions. City accepted into ILG’s Beacon Awards program, in which requires progress reports on industry BMPs to allow continual and evolutionary benchmarking of City activities. Strategy Continue and expand collaborative procurement, grant, technical assistance and fellowships efforts to grow programs and enable advanced technology acquisition Measure Updated Green Purchasing Policy, new Technology Demonstration Policy, tracking tools. Metric Policies and tracking tools developed. 2015/16 Outcome City staff has an approved IT-endorsed green purchasing policy and PW- endorsed technology demonstration policy with which to make decisions. Grant, award, technical/fellowship assistance database and tracking tool in place and utilize across relevant departments. Status . To pursue acknowledgement of leading City sustainability efforts, Cupertino’s application was accepted for participation in the Institute for Local Government’s Beacon Award Program for 2016. ,S staff will be contributing activity data for possible award in late 2016. Council approved re- joining the Compact of Mayors, to increase recognition and accountability for sustainability programs nationally, in which staff will also be submitting progress in late 2016. 333 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version GOAL Lead outreach to ensure that all community members acquire the knowledge, skills, and tools to meet current and future sustainability challenges. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Development and roll out of resident and business surveys. Polling is forthcoming as part of the community survey and updated Cupertino green website. Exploring appropriate utilization of Peak Democracy, Town Hall tools and Community Based Social Marketing techniques for surveying and activating residents and businesses on CAP Measures. Strategy Elevate awareness of and participation in existing and pilot sustainability initiatives among residents and businesses, to advance ecological citizenship models. Measure Number of new surveying tools that produce meaningful or actionable results; program participation, satisfaction, retention. Metric How many people take the surveys; number/percent of people aware of each program/service/survey question. Number of program participants from baseline, over time. 2015/16 Outcome Have baseline idea of how knowledgeable residents and businesses are of programs, services, technologies. Produce list of discrepancies between services offered and results of community interest surveys. Initiate outreach campaign development. Status Researching other agency models for this type of exercise that are the most cost effective and achieve the highest response rate. Attendeding Community Based Social Marketing training to gather best practices, knowledge and insight into options for effective surveying of and 334 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version engagement with of residents and businesses on targeted CAP Measures. CITY CLERK GOAL Streamline information processing for Council, staff, and public. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 50% of employees sign acknowledgement and answer questions successfully. Records Retention policy and procedures packet to be included in the new employee hiring package given out by HR and this PM will not be included in the next budget cycle for the City Clerk’s division. Records Retention Ppolicy distributed to all employees and via email and new employee hiring package.. Strategy All employees receive Records Retention policy and procedures. Measure Clerk's office receives signed acknowledgement that employee received and reviewed policy and procedures. Also, employee will answer two questions about the policy and/or procedures. Metric Percentage of employees who sign acknowledgement and answer questions successfully. 2015/16 Outcome Success enabled by having simple, clear instructions and/or policies for records retention, formatting staff reports and attachments, and drafting agenda items in Legistar; training individuals on these instructions/policies; support from City Manager and Department Heads to respect packet deadlines. Status City Clerk’s office emailed the Records Retention Ppolicy and Pprocedures packet to the Department Admins to forward to each employee in the 335 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version department. As noted in 1st Quarter, Records Retention Ppolicy and Pprocedures packet to be included in the new employee hiring package given out by HR.. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 75% of users sign acknowledgment City Clerk’s office will contact Department Admins and Commission staff liaisons to identify all employees who draft Council agenda items and/or create commission agendas. Alt. pathway to user agreement pursued: Relevant users identified and received written instructions. Clerk’s Office conducted/will continue to conduct trainings on Granicus Legistar/InSite. Strategy Identify employees who draft Council agenda items and/or create commission agendas and train them on Granicus Legistar/Insite. Measure Clerk's office receives signed acknowledgement from employee and trainer that instructions were received and employee was trained. Metric Percentage of users who sign acknowledgement. 2015/16 Outcome All users trained and sufficient proficient in program. Status Employees who draft Council agenda items and/or create commission agendas have been identified. Users have received written instructions. The City Clerk’s office has trained the commission liaisons and Department Admins have trained users in their department on Granicus Legistar/InSite. The City Clerk’s office feels confident in the training without receiving a signed acknowledgment. The City Clerk’s office will continue to identify any new employees who need training on the software but will not require a written acknowledgment. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 336 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 50% of the time, each Dept. Head and City Manager will have Council agenda items approved and Clerk's office will have packet prepared by specified deadline. Departments are already aware of the agenda deadlines and PM will not be included in the next budget cycle for the City Clerk’s division. Departments are already aware of the agenda deadlines. Strategy Final approval of Council agenda items by 4:00 p.m. on packet day. Clerk's office will post packet and send information to Council members no later than 6:30 p.m. on packet day. Measure Clerk's office will track when each department's Council agenda items were approved by the Dept. Head and City Manager. Metric Percentage of time each department's Council agenda items are approved and packet ready by specified deadline. 2015/16 Outcome All departments aware of and adhere to deadlines. Packets processed no later than 5pm on packet day. Status This Performance Measure strategy and outcome relies on the performance of other departments getting their agenda items in the system in a timely manner for the City Manager’s approval. Departments are already aware of the deadlines and the City Clerk’s office can only begin processing the packet once all agenda items are in the system and approved. This PM will not be included in the next budget cycle for the City Clerk’s division. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter NEW: 100% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. 100% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. 94% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline. Strategy Public Record Act requests responded to in a timely manner. 337 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Measure Public Record Act requests log “due date” column (including any “extension”) and “date fulfilled” column match. Metric Percentage of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. 2015/16 Outcome 100% of Public Record Act requests responded to by the deadline date. Status 36 17 Public Record Act requests were logged for first second quarter FY 2015-16 and 36 16 were responded to by the deadline date. The one request not responded to by the deadline date required 16 staff hours including outside counsel support. The request was responded to partially and was completed within a week. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter NEW: 80% of City Council minutes for regular meetings presented for Council approval by the following regular meeting. 71% of minutes for regular Council meetings submitted for approval at the next regular Council meeting. 100% of minutes for regular Council meetings submitted for approval at the next regular Council meeting. Strategy City Council minutes prepared and presented for City Council approval in a timely manner. Measure Clerk’s office will track the date of each regular Council meeting and when the draft minutes were presented for approval. Metric Percentage of regular Council meeting minutes approved by the next regular Council meeting. 2015/16 Outcome 80% of minutes for regular Council meetings submitted for approval at the next regular Council meeting. Status Seven Five regular Council meetings and one special Council meeting occurred in first second quarter. including two meetings that went past 11:00 p.m. Five sets of minutes for regular Council meetings were submitted for approval by the next regular meeting. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 338 Administration - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version NEW: 90% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 100% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 100% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. Strategy Adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances signed and scanned to Laserfiche in a timely manner. Measure Clerk’s office will track time it takes to process adopted resolutions and ordinances after a City Council meeting until the time they are scanned to Laserfiche. Metric Percentage of City Council adopted resolutions and ordinances signed and uploaded to Laserfiche for public viewing within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 2015/16 Outcome 100% of adopted City Council resolutions and ordinances were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. Status 34 resolutions and three ordinances were adopted in first quarter and 100% were processed and scanned to Laserfiche within a week of Clerk’s office receipt of final, signed documents. 339 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version ADMINISTRATION GOAL Improve customer service experience and relationships. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Enhance website functions and usability/searchability. Enhance access to online documents. In progress In progress Strategy Provide the public and customers with the ability and tools to answer questions online resources. Measure Updated website with survey prompts. Track Comcate tickets/utilize services through alternative Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software if/when piloted. Metric Track number of website views, hits, and/or downloads. Survey responses. 2015/16 Outcome Customers are empowered to get the information and tools they are seeking easily to increase transparency and efficiency. Status Building website reorganized for better usability. Planning website reorganization in progress. City-wide website re-design in progress, but not complete. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop curriculum and presentations to achieve specific and targeted learning outcomes. Once administered, convert workshop content into online sessions to heighten information sharing and access. Create tools to enable text survey/polling. In progress Peak Democracy’s Open Town Hall utilized In progress Strategy Increase community outreach and education to foster greater awareness and build community knowledge of the planning and development process by organizing, hosting, and recording local training or informational workshops and presenting to relevant stakeholder groups. 340 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Measure Updated website with survey prompts. (Paper, Text, Online) Surveys provided to workshop attendees to gauge knowledge before and after session as well as satisfaction to information delivery. Metric Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software (if/when piloted by department) or community outreach tracking tool (excel) denoting # of workshops hosted, # of attendees, # of survey responses (text or CRM) on the quality/usefulness of materials presented. Number of page views/downloads of online community workshop videos. 2015/16 Outcome Online public education and public information (articles, tips, fact sheets) generate greater customer support and education and serve as a more efficient and effective community outreach. Increased connectivity between the public and department builds community engagement and trust, thereby enabling expanded community input from broader participants. Model effective private-sector customer engagement and interactions where applicable. Status Conducted Economic Development Strategic Business Plan Roundtable community meeting Vallco, The Oaks, and The Hamptons developers sponsored several community outreach meetings to provide information and gather public comments. Utilized Peak Democracy’s Open Town Hall as an online forum to engage the public for the General Plan Amendment. GOAL Build, Support, Sustain Workforce Performance Excellence. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Strengthen employee development opportunities to encourage professional growth and improvements and stronger understanding of processes within and among Department. Ongoing Ongoing Strategy Improve teamwork and employee satisfaction to foster stronger customer service experience. Measure Expand professional development opportunities to include training and career enrichment courses/seminars, cross training with other departments, special topics or learning from guest speakers /educators. Metric Track/schedule numbers of special sessions and topics each year. Employee survey responses. 341 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 2015/16 Outcome Professional development efforts build a cadre of better trained and efficient staff and improve the quality of public service. Status Planning Division staff attended annual California American Planning Association conference for continuing education and professional development. Building Division provided four Title 24 training sessions at Staff meetings. Building Division staff attended annual Calbo conference for continuing education and professional development. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Host department retreats/ work sessions (1/year), alt. dept. job shadowing, mentorship program with experts in the field. Improve Economic Dev. interface via quarterly updates. Ongoing In progress Ongoing Economic Development Manager attends Planning staff meeting on a quarterly basis to share updates Strategy Build inter/intra dept. relations to expand City staff support network required to enable successful operations/planning processes. Measure Quarterly/annual employee reviews, prioritize professional development discussions with supervisors. Staff/supervisors collaborate to develop professional development plans. Metric Track work sessions and retreats in professional development matrix/plan. Progress in achieving objectives and actions outlined in professional development plans. 2015/16 Outcome Grow relationships within divisions and across departments to take advantage of opportunities to learn, improve team partnership and grow greater work satisfaction, build a better trained and well-rounded staff, and improve quality of public service and customer satisfaction. Status Conducted annual employee reviews as they are due. Planning Division retreat on September 17, 2015 provided team building exercises and addressed challenges and solutions. Weekly work sessions for planners are conducted weekly following the division staff meeting. Economic Development Manager provides quarterly updates at Planning Division Staff meetings. 342 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 343 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version PLANNING GOAL Demystify the planning process. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Enable customer to access status of plan/development review through new online permitting system. In progress New permit system went live on Jan 11, 2016. Online public portal expected to go online in Spring 2016. Strategy Empower customers to get useful information and helpful tools easily online. Measure Updated website with survey prompts, Comcate tickets or alt. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Software if/when piloted. Implement online permitting system to provide customer access to information. Metric Track # of website views, hits, and/or downloads. Customer satisfaction and user experience via survey responses. Track project development timelines prior to and after system implementation. 2015/16 Outcome Department increases transparency and efficiency through heightened public access and improves accountability and overall customer experience. Status Planning Division website reorganization in progress. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Team w/ dpts. to increase community outreach through new technologies. Build youth engagement by connecting regularly with Teen Commission, De Anza College, and High Schools student groups In progress Ongoing. Strategy Tap quiet majority of community members not currently participating in the planning, development, ordinance, or public hearing process. 344 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Measure Deploy new community engagement and/or Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tools. Expanded social media and pro-active vs. reactive planning-led outreach efforts. Metric Track website views, hits, and/or downloads. Customer satisfaction and user experience survey responses. 2015/16 Outcome Garner greater customer support and education to build and operationalize efficient and effective community outreach, strengthen community engagement and relations, and gain access to broader and more diverse community input. Status Utilized Peak Democracy’s Open Town Hall as an online forum to engage the public. Engaged the Teen Commissioners to provide ideas and comments for the General Plan Amendment. Conducted WELO community outreach meeting on February 1, 2016, with Sustainability Division. GOAL Expand outreach to the business community to surface and address business needs through available and future City services. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Engagement strategy drafted and includes,: visiting companies, retail businesses, meeting with Chamber leadership, participating in local/regional business organizations, attending networking events, meeting with real estate brokers and property managers. In progress Ongoing Econ Dev Manager continues to host monthly Women’s Networking Mixers (average attendance is 25). Economic Development supported and hosted the Silicon Valley StartUp Cup entrepreneurship competition. Strategy Develop business engagement strategy, targets, timeline, milestones and tracking tool. Evaluate lessons learned to integrate into future performance measures and work program. 345 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Measure Feedback tool developed to learn experiences of businesses to date and assess future informational and service needs. Tracking tool developed to record # of site visits, meetings, functions, etc. Metric Quantity of meetings. Business experience survey results. 2015/16 Outcome Increase business relations with the City, evaluate existing business services, define new business support resources, and generate new business to business partnerships. Status Assistant City Manager, Economic Development Manager and Senior Housing Planner regularly attend the Legislative Action Committee, Chamber of Commerce meetings, Rotary meetings, Santa Clara County Association of Planning Official meetings. Economic Development Manager hosted Women’s Networking Workshop. GOAL Improve City economy, vitality, sustainability, and economic diversity. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Develop curriculum and presentations to achieve specific and targeted learning outcomes. Once administered, convert workshop content into online sessions to heighten information sharing and access. Create tools to enable text survey/polling. In development Ongoing Conducted community and business outreach meetings as part of EDSP process. Completed and presented the background/current conditions report to City Council. Continue to meet with prospective businesses interested in Cupertino. Strategy Running in parallel to and informed by the in-progress Economic Development Strategic Plan, create a customized suite of support resources for businesses, emphasizing small businesses. Measure Host, sponsor and co-sponsor workshops and training events. Provide online. Surveys provided to workshop attendees to gauge knowledge before and after session as well as satisfaction to information delivery. 346 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Metric Community outreach tracking tool (excel) denoting # of workshops hosted, # of attendees, # of survey responses (text or CRM) on the quality/usefulness of materials presented. Number of page views/downloads of online community workshop videos. 2015/16 Outcome Amplify suite of services offered to small local businesses to better enable their ongoing success and ensure their long-term viability in our community. Status In development GOAL Improve outreach and information sharing targeting internal staff and the public to create greater connectivity with our business base. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Map current connection points between staff, electeds, the broader public, and our local businesses including, but not limited to: BizBuzz electronic newsletter, "How to Start a Business in Cupertino" Guide, Items of Interest, Council Work Program, Scene Articles, website. Ongoing Ongoing Economic Development utilizing Constant Contact service for its BizBuzz newsletter. Translated “Welcome to Cupertino” and Demographics handouts into Chinese. Strategy Increase internal and external outreach channels and resources to increase community knowledge of and orientation towards local business services, activities, products. Measure Inventory current informational materials and resources. Learn "user" experience through surveys, page views, downloads, inquiries logged through Comcate or other Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tool. Consider tools to track how this information is generating "leads" or driving customers to local businesses. 347 Community Development - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version Metric Quantity of page views, downloads, positive survey, customer experiences, information to customer conversions. 2015/16 Outcome Identify informational gaps and embed plan to address in Strategic Plan. Develop tool to track how City resources lead to greater local business support/sales. Status Updates and information published regularly in BizBuzz, Items of Interest, Cupertino Scene and on the website. 348 Law Enforcement - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT GOAL Maintain adequate Sheriff response times to citizen calls. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Per Contract Priority One: 5 minutes Priority Two: 9 minutes Priority Three: 20 minutes N/A Exceeding expectations Continuing to exceed expectations Strategy Monitor average response time for emergency calls Measure Priority One: Respond within 5 minutes Priority Two: Respond within 9 minutes Priority Three: Respond within 20 minutes Metric Logged in Public Safety Report 2015/16 Outcome Priority One: Response 3.54 minutes Priority Two: Response 6.55 minutes Priority Three: Response 11.26 minutes Status Priority One 1st Quarter: July - 2.99 / Aug – 3.52 / Sept – 3.86 Priority One 2nd Quarter: Oct – 1.57 / Nov – 4.93 / Dec – 4.35 Priority Two 1st Quarter: July - 6.80 /Aug – 6.10 / Sept – 7.06 Priority Two 2nd Quarter: Oct – 6.27 / Nov – 6.57 / Dec – 6.48 Priority Three 1st Quarter: July – 11.10 / Aug- 11.35 / Sept – 11.02 Priority Three 2nd Quarter: Oct – 10.35 / Nov – 12.65 / Dec – 11.04 GOAL Provide crime prevention efforts through public interaction and education. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 3 N/A Started Fall Academy Completed Fall Academy Strategy Conduct Teen Academy classes. Measure Number of Teen Academy classes held. 349 Law Enforcement - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 2 Metric 2015/16 Outcome 2 Status The Fall Teen Academy runs from 9/29-12/17/15. There will be 12 sessions with 22 students participating. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 2519 N/A 11On track 14 Strategy Conduct Code Red training and drills. Measure Number of training/drills held. Metric 2015/16 Outcome 210 Status 21 Schools are currently scheduled for the Run, Hide, Defend trainings and lock down drills. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1 N/A No meetings scheduledProgram not offered for FY 15/16 3 meetings attended Strategy Conduct "Every 15 Minutes" program. Measure Number of presentations held. Metric 2015/16 Outcome 1 Status “Every 15 minutes” is currently scheduled to be held at Homestead High School in April 2016 going through funding and personnel changes with the 350 Law Enforcement - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 3 sponsoring agencies. As a result, no high schools have scheduled this exercise for FY 15/16. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 9 N/A OneOne meeting attendedto date Six meetings attended Strategy Conduct school attendance review board (SARB) meetings for Cupertino Unified School District and DA Mediation for the Fremont Union High School District.. Measure Number of meetings held. Metric 2015/16 Outcome 1 SARB in the first quarter and 3 SARB/ 3 DA Mediation meetings in the second quarter.12 Status SevenOne meetings conducted through SeptemDecember which conform to school year. 351 Public Affairs - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 1 ADMINISTRATION GOAL Provide superior customer service both in-house and public-facing. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Customer satisfaction survey ratings of good to excellent. N/A Annual Annual Strategy Develop customer service best practice guide and host training to institutionalize practices. Measure Customer satisfaction index based upon user satisfaction and number of cases reported. Metric Use Access Cupertino and user surveys to assess community satisfaction. 2015/16 Outcome Satisfied customers as indicated by high internal and end-user ratings. Ratings included in employee performance evaluations. Status Survey conducted annually. New Survey planned for 4th Quarter. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase rate of online utilization by 10% over previous year. Number of users accessing City information through each channel. N/A2014 Jul 2,104 Jul 2,270 Oct 7.8% Increase 2,426 Dec 15.3% Increase Strategy Strive for innovation in customer service approaches. Build in-house experts to serve diverse customer needs. Measure Be an adaptive organization and act as facilitators, enablers, and experts on technology and communications to provide customers and end-users relevant access to City information. Metric Utilize monthly social media and web usage statistics to determine access to City information. Utilize intranet statistics and Google Analytics. 2015/16 Outcome Deploy widely used and growing variety of differentiated online services. Status Continuing to promote and expand use of social media. 352 Public Affairs - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GOAL Build an IT strategic plan to serve as a management tool, guide decision making, and prioritize staffing. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Actionable plan developed, all staff engaged in its implementation, resources adequately aligned to achieve plan goals. N/A Initial document complete Matrix of IT priorities documented Strategy Hire third-party consultant to survey staff needs, assess technology gaps and develop an implementation plan. Measure Plan developed. Technology projects listed. Tracking tool implemented. Metric Number of completed technology projects. Inventory and status of technology services. 2015/16 Outcome Formally adopt IT strategic plan. Status Consultant provided document. First staff governance meeting held. Recruitment for CTO in process. COMMUNICATIONS GOAL Develop a Communications strategic plan to guide organizational outreach priorities and associated staffing. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Actionable plan developed, all staff engaged in roll-out, resources adequately aligned to achieve plan goals. N/A Communication assessment complete Action plan being implemented Strategy Explore consultant options to survey community and staff needs, assess media gaps, implementation plan to address those needs and gaps. 353 Public Affairs - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 3 Measure Plan developed. Needs and gaps identified. Communications projects listed. Tracking tool implemented. Metric Number of current and prospective communication projects. Inventory of communication services. 2015/16 Outcome Formally adopt strategic plan. Status Consultant submitted final communicationsCommunications assessment complete. Action plan being implemented. Studies complete. Priority established and citywide communication meetings have commenced.implementation next phase. GIS GOAL Assist community in visualizing and transforming geographic data into usable information. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Actionable plan developed, all staff engaged in roll- out, resources adequately aligned to achieve plan goals. N/A N/A N/A RFP Strategy Provide high-quality geospatial data, application development and expertise to the City of Cupertino staff and general public. Measure Utilize website to track visits to the home page, Open Data, map/app gallery and MapGuide/Magnet. Metric Track the number of requests for assistance in general GIS, mapping requests, data request and Cityworks. 2015/16 Outcome Formally adopt strategic plan. Status Monitoring requests for assistance. 354 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS GOAL Clean creeks in Cupertino. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) One business day response to illegal discharge to creeks 2) Conduct minimum of 14 creek cleanup events annually 3) Receive no negative actions from enforcement agencies 100% New measure New measure 100% 4/14 complete None received 100% 8X/14 Complete None received Strategy Prevent to the maximum extent practicable items other than rain water from entering the storm water system. Measure 1) Respond to reported discharge event within one business day. 2) Annual cleanups 3) Quantify actions from enforcement agencies. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time or time after call or email is received. 2) Quantification of the number of Annual Clean Up Events 3) Quantification of negative actions received from enforcement agencies. 2015/16 Outcome Achieve stormwater compliance requirements, ensure healthy protected water system. Status Ongoing with additional efforts to increase community involvement. GOAL Provide efficient and effective recycling, organic and disposal services. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Develop organics ordinance. Define data needs and assess tracking tools available (i.e. EPA ReTRAC). 2) Implement organic diversion requirements to New measure New measure Complete Completed Provide Ongoing support and education for businesses implementing the 355 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 2 affected businesses for Businesses generating > 8cy of organic waste - Sept. 2015 ordinance. Completed for Businesses generating > 34cy of organic waste or 25% of total waste stream comprised of organics -– Jan 20,. 20165 Strategy Divert materials from landfill through expanded recycling and organic policies and services, paired with effective outreach campaigns to increase residential and commercial participation. Measure Monthly diversion reporting from solid waste franchisee and annual CalRecyle diversion rate equivalent (DRE) calculation. Metric Achieve 75% (DRE) diversion, 60% commercial & multifamily diversion. Customer service satisfaction (Godbe Survey). 2015/16 Outcome Adopt organics ordinance and utilize data collection to track progress. Status Ongoing DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GOAL Provide timely development review and permitting services. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 2 week response 90% of time Strategy Review and permit private development in a timely and consistent manner in accordance with applicable codes, standards and policies. 356 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 3 Measure Respond to complete plan submittals or applications within 2 weeks Metric Track response times using Development Tracking System (not yet implemented) 2015/16 Outcome Strengthened partnership with Community Development. Clear roles and timelines defined. Customer experience improved. Status Development Tracking System was implemented in January 2016. Staff are currently gathering data and will be able to provide updates in the near future. CIP ADMINISTRATION GOAL Deliver Capital Projects on time and within budget. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter On time and within budget 80% of time. 10/12 (83%) Strategy Meet published commitments to Council and community in an effective, timely, and quality manner. Measure Project and/or budget management software or alternative tracking tool to enable better accountability of costs, expenses and revenues related to a project. Metric Timeline and budget variances for each project and tracked for program over time. 2015/16 Outcome Deliver project within budget and achieve beneficial occupancy within one month of projected completion date at time of award. Status Measurements methods under development. STREETS GOAL Safe street markings, legends and signs for motorist, cyclists, and pedestrians. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 357 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 4 1) One business day response to reported unsafe conditions. 100% 100% Strategy Appropriately placed street markings, legends and signs benefit motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. Measure 1) Respond to street marking, legend and sign issues within 3 business days Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2) CityWorks software 2015/16 Outcome 2015 & 16 paving projects have had scope of work increased to include safe street marking and legend work on both streets scheduled and not scheduled for pavement improvement. Status Ongoing GOAL No viewable graffiti within Cupertino. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Remove 100% of known graffiti on public City property within 4 2 business days 100% 100% Strategy Remove graffiti before more tagging occurs. Measure Clean up within 48 2 business hours days of call. Metric Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Community aesthetic maintained. Status Ongoing. Coordination required as needed when graffiti occurs on Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) or Caltrans property. GOAL Maintain reliable storm drain system. 358 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 5 FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond to reported storm drain system deficiencies within one business day 100% 100% Strategy Efficiently inspected and maintained storm drain system assists in minimizing the potential for localized flooding. Measure 1) Respond to reported storm drain system deficiencies within 24 business hours. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Ongoing Status Collection system cleaning / videoing of hot spot areas scheduled forcompleted in November ’15 completion. Installation of three manhole monitoring systems to be complete in February ’16. GOAL Effectively maintain streetlight network. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond to reported streetlight outages within 2 business days 2) Resolve issues with City owned streetlights within 5 business days. 100% 100% 100% Strategy Repair streetlights in a timely manner. Measure 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback 2) CityWorks software 359 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 6 Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Reliable streetlight network that promotes community safety. Status Ongoing GOAL Citywide street network pavement condition index (PCI) of 80 by 2019; no street below 30 for two consecutive years. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Network PCI of 80 by FY19/20. 2) No individual street PCI <30 for two consecutive years. Network PCI = 70 3.8% of network <PCI of 30 Network PCI = 70 3.8% of network <PCI of 30 Strategy Well maintained streets conserve resources, promote commerce and promote community safety. Measure 1) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) StreetSaver reports. Metric 1) Sufficient operating budget recommended and approved. 2) Annual pavement condition report as calculated by StreetSaver and submitted to the MTC. 2015/16 Outcome Street network PCI is calculated to be 72 and approximately 4 miles of streets will have a PCI <30 at the end of 2016. Status Network PCI is calculated to improve from a current value of 70 to 72. Continued improvement is conditional to future budget appropriation. GOAL Safe pedestrian pathways FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond and mitigate reported pathway deficiencies within 1 business day. 100% 100% 100% 360 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 7 Strategy Maintain sidewalks, curb and gutter to a standard that minimizes liability. Measure 1) Respond and mitigate pathway deficiencies within 1 business day. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2015/16 Outcome Safer pedestrian pathways mitigate potential issues and support citizen's quality of life. Status Ongoing TREES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY GOAL Healthy and expanding urban forest. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 1) Respond to reported safety issues with 1 business day 2) Inspect and maintain all street trees and park trees within 5 year cycle. 3) Plant more trees than removed. 100% New Measure 100% New Measure 100% 1804 Trees maintained and inspectedOngoing Ongoing142 Trees Planted, 31 Trees Removed Strategy Maintain urban forest to ISA standards that minimize liability, improve and/or maintain tree values. 361 Public Works - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 8 Measure 1) Respond and mitigate safety issues within one business day24 business hours. 2) Inspect and maintain all street trees and park trees within 5 year cycle. 3) Number of trees planted compared to number of trees removed. Metric 1) Comcate logged response time and customer feedback. 2) CityWorks software. 2015/16 Outcome Urban canopy expanded, protected, serviced. Safety issues mitigated. Status FY15/16 is the last year of a 4 year program to plant 1600 trees citywide. 362 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 1 ADMINISTRATION GOAL Develop a healthy, positive and connected team. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 100% of priorities complete by June 30, 2016. N/A On Track On track Strategy Identify Department priorities for FY 15/16 and form sub-committees to work on each goal. Measure Priorities list developed, readily accessed and tracked by each implementing program. Metric Percentage of priorities completed by December 2015 and June 2016. 2015/16 Outcome Improved technology, marketing and customer service levels. Status Perfect Mind contract approved signedin negotiations. Estimated completion 09/2016. New Business & Community Services Division rollout in January May 2016 addresses the above. All 2015 goals in process or completed. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Benchmark current inner departmental communications tools and develop a priority list of expansion opportunities. Deploy tools to improve RCS staff knowledge of ongoing and prior successes. N/A On Track On track Strategy Establish a department newsletter denoting quarterly accomplishments and items of interest. McClellan Ranch quarterly newsletter implemented. Measure Survey staff at departmental meetings to evaluate experience and gauge awareness of colleague's projects. Metric Increase awareness of City and department issues and projects by 10%. 363 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 2 2015/16 Outcome Enhanced communication of department projects and accomplishments. Status Monthly department meetings have been implemented as well as a quarterly newsletter. Utilizing items of interest to increase awareness of department projects and accomplishments. Monthly meetings implemented with senior management and Public Works. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increased participation in cross-division events by 25%. N/A On Track On track Strategy Establish monthly department wide meetings to team build, communicate subcommittee milestones and organization issues/successes. Measure Meetings convened, hosted, tracked. Information shared with all departmental members. Metric Percentage of participation at meetings and department events. 2015/16 Outcome Strong cohesive team developed to expand partnerships and elevate customer services and experience. Status Monthly Department meetings implemented achieving 90% participation. Sub-committees established for technology, customer service and marketing and facility use policies. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 100% participation in annual training for all full- time staff. Annual enhancement of customer service modules for all part- time staff during in-service training. N/A On Track On track Strategy Place high priority on training and encourage expanded professional development opportunities for staff. Measure Percentage of participation in annual training courses, passing- oncommunicating new ideas, program concepts and service delivery tips via internal communications cataloging /project management tool. Track customer service experience before/following implementation via online, in-class surveys, Comcate. 364 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 3 Metric Quantity of courses offered, participant attendance. Tool to foster greater team dialog and brainstorming explored. Positive customer experiences recorded. 2015/16 Outcome Customer service experience improved. Customer service modules available online and shared with all departments to ensure consistency. Status All staff required to attend skill enhancement training. On track for 100% compliance. Staff “reports out” to full department what they learned at monthly meetings. Annual department workshop off-site scheduled 2/23-2/24/16.for June 2016 GOAL Increase use of technology to facilitate efficiency, expand marketing and bolster customer experience. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Registration available at any facility 100% of the time. Participant feedback readily available. N/A Pending Perfect Mind Software Installation Pending Perfect Mind Software installation Strategy Implement a new registration system department-wide. Measure Development of methods to register and obtain customer feedback electronically using internet and smart devices. Metric Quantity and quality of customer feedback received prior to and following system deployment 2015/16 Outcome Improved employee efficiency and productivity. Customer experience improved and access to information enabled. Status Contract approved by City Council and in negotiations.signed 1/31/16. Staff has proposed new procedures to streamline facility rental process. Perfect Mind discovery process to start within 30-60 days. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 10% increase in social media outreach. N/A On Track On track Strategy Effective use of social media marketing for classes and events. 365 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 4 Measure Development of methods to notify customers via social media. Metric List of methods currently used. List of new approaches. Project management schedule and timeline to implement methods. 2015/16 Outcome Strengthen partnership with Communications Department to develop an outreach plan for RCS that defines effective messaging, civic media assets, roles, timelines, and responsibilities. Status -Marketing seminar attended in September 2015 -Target marketing media identified -Pilot program anticipated for Big Bunny 5K/Fun Run -Implementation of Perfect Mind will enhance capabilities as well as establishment of Business division in January May 2016. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Scala screen Installation at four facilities with weekly program information. N/A On Track On track Strategy Install Scala monitors in each facility with program specific content for the facility and then the department. Measure Development of marketing information for each site and department wide. Metric Inventory of information to share. Timeline to implement system. 2015/16 Outcome Expanded customer access to information on programs and services on a facility-by-facility basis. Status Scala screens now installed at Quinlan, Senior Center and Sports Center. Environmental Educ Center at McClellan is pending. Training with City Channel to be schedule training with staffd. PARK PLANNING AND RESTORATION GOAL Pursue new parks and improvements to existing parks, guided by community input. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Corridor Master Plan report delivered by January Spring 2016. Incorporate user comments into N/A On Track On track 366 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 5 programming. Strategy Facilitate a Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Ranch Road Corridor Master Plan. Measure Solicit community input through a wide number of outreach events including public meetings, web site outreach, surveys and stakeholder interviews. Metric Online survey participation, post card mailing, social media/civic engagement tool tracking. 2015/16 Outcome Provide a 20 Year master plan for the BBF Golf Course, BBF Swim & Picnic facility, Stevens Creek Trail and McClellan Ranch Preserve (Environmental Education Center/Blacksmith Shop/Barn, etc.) Consultant, M.I.G., is in process of completing report. Golf Course component complete by National Golf Foundation (NGF). Status Report is scheduled for Parks & Recreation Commission in December March 20165 and City Council in January May 2016. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter City wide Park Master Plan report delivered by September February 20176. Incorporate user comments into programming. N/A On Track On track Strategy Facilitate a City Wide Park Open Space and Recreation Master Plan. Measure Solicit community input through a wide number of outreach events including public meetings, web site outreach, surveys and stakeholder interviews. Metric Online survey participation, post card mailing, social media/civic engagement tool tracking, public meetings.. 2015/16 Outcome Provide a 20 year Park, Open Space and Recreation Master Plan to improve customer service experience. Status Contract awarded to RHAA. Work began October 2015. Website and on- line survey rollout February 2016. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Lawrence Mitty - Complete appraisals & soils testing; negotiate property N/A On Track On track 367 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 6 acquisition; annex property, apply for grant funding by 12/2016. Main Street - Review and recommend modifications by 5/2015. N/A Complete Strategy Pursue the acquisition of parks and trails on the east side of Cupertino. Measure Identify and carry out the steps to acquire the County Roads and Airport property known as the Lawrence Mitty Linear parcel; Review the Main Street Park Plan and facilitate Park and Recreation Commission and City Council review and approval. Metric Project management timeline developed, milestones achieved. Budget prepared and achieved. 2015/16 Outcome Expand park assets and associated community benefits citywide. Status Lawrence Mitty – appraisals done. Soil testing scheduled for November early 2016. Main Street park design revised and approved by Parks & Recreation Commission and Council. Construction pending. FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY EVENTS GOAL Upgrade the Quinlan Community Center to increase usage and revenue generation from the facility. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Reduce energy costs by 10%. Reduce maintenance time by 10%; Enhancements complete by 612/2015. N/A On Track Completed Strategy Complete the Quinlan Community Center Upgrade project: energy efficient lighting, facility upgrades. Measure Replace lighting fixtures. Replace flooring for more efficient maintenance. Paint all public spaces and remodel front office. Metric Pre-and-post site energy use tracked. Project timeline and milestones tracked. 2015/16 Outcome Facility energy use and aesthetics improved. 368 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 7 Status Quinlan Community Center remodel complete; pending (a) interior painting and (b) New lighting in Cupertino Room complete. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase facility rentals by 5%. N/A On Track On track Strategy Utilize new marketing materials for promotion of the Center. Measure Prepare new marketing materials: virtual tours, marketing brochures, marketing binders, social media announcements. Metric Online user surveys. Site access/click-throughs. 2015/16 Outcome Additional revenue generated through increased program enrollment. Status New Business Division will be addressing after January May 2016. Facility use policy being revised with goals for easier registration process for customers. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase facility rentals by 5%. N/A On Track On track Strategy Book multiple rentals per day if possible. Measure Implement scheduling software. Metric Bookings pre-and-post deployment. 2015/16 Outcome Additional revenue generated through increased space programming. Status New Business Division will be address with installation of Perfect Mind reservation system and new facility use policy. 369 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 8 370 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 9 GOAL Implement creative solutions at Blackberry Farm to improve the customer service experience while complying with new bus restrictions into the complex. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase revenue by 10%. N/A Complete Strategy Expand pool and picnic programs for the summer season. Measure Outline current programs and services. Evaluate expansion opportunities based upon resident surveys, assessment of adjacent city municipal services. Metric Survey results. Service gap analysis. Programs proposed. 2015/16 Outcome Expand services and resultant revenues through: pool party packages; catering packages; water aerobic classes, etc. Status 1-Staff will be pursuing expanded programming in conjunction with Foot Golf groups and an “Adult Learn how to Swim” campaign in April 2016. 2-For the 2015 season, revenue increased by 13.4% or $35,514 compared to 2014. This increase was primarily in the areas of swimming and café sales. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Maintain status quo re: number of field trips and not loose patrons. N/A Complete Strategy Educate patrons on transportation options and provide acceptable customer service alternatives to bussing children into BBF. Measure Evaluate current site transportation services and alternatives via survey. Meet off-site busses with carts to carry in their coolers and supplies. Metric Service summary developed. Alternatives proposed. Traffic mitigations recommended. Informational materials developed. Survey results recorded. 2015/16 Outcome Mitigate site traffic impacts and create a more pleasant guest experience. Status The efforts listed have been implemented, however, due to the inconvenience of walking small children into the facility and other factors 371 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 10 beyond our control, several groups will not be using the facility next year. YOUTH AND TEEN PROGRAMS GOAL Grow a healthy community by evaluating opportunities to expand community participation in programs and facilitate greater access to services, facilities and parks across all demographics. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Adjust weekend hours at the Teen Center to provide more opportunities for private events and increase rental revenue by 20%. N/A On Track Objective Accomplished Strategy Adjust current Teen Center operational hours to increase rental periods. Measure Teen Center rental revenue monitored and managed via facility rental software. Metric Yearly rental revenue reviewed and compared to previous yearly revenue reports. 2015/16 Outcome Rental opportunities and facility options expanded for community and revenue from facility rentals increased. Status Currently a 66% increase in rentals. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Increase number of Teen/Adult Art, S.T.E.M., nature programs by adding at least 2 new contractors to support student demands. Review opportunities and requirements to expand preschool program. N/A On Track On Track Strategy Consult with current contract instructors to explore additional service offerings and expand classes for teens and adults. Acquire feedback from 372 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 11 target population on desired programming, including expanded preschool. Measure Registration software reports including returning students; Class satisfaction surveys administered to participants of all new and existing programs, including requests for new or expanded services. Metric Participant and revenue totals measured against figures before new program deployment. Customer feedback would be reviewed through survey results detailing participant satisfaction. 2015/16 Outcome Teen and Adult recreational class selections expanded for community. Revenue for Teen/Adult classes increased. Preschool program has clearly defined expansion pathway. Status Teen S.T.E.M.-youth start-up expanded their offerings. Includes two new computer coding camps and quarterly afterschool web design class. New contractor, Clinton Brownley, will offering youth and teen programs and data analysis programs in Winter. May offer adult programs in future. Nature Classes—New instructor, Charlie Kennard, will be teaching a Twined Tule and basket making class geared for teens and adults (13+) this Winter. Cait Hutnik will be teaching a Lichen class for all ages. Adult Art—Mobile Art Academy added as instructor last Spring; Offering youth camps and quarterly adult classes. Two youth camps were full this summer, while adult classes have been slow to gain momentum. Additional classes being offered for Teen and Adults: 3D Modeling and Sculpturing and e-book Creation. Also added a computer coding class: Heads Up Hands down Android Development. SPORTS AND FITNESS GOAL Offer Sports Center programs targeted at school age groups in order to entice more families to join the Center. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 5% increase in family memberships N/A On Track Strategy Expand memberships through expanded services desired by the community. Measure Survey members to identify needs and the broader public to identify service gaps. Evaluate programs to find gaps in programming for these age groups. Metric Survey results. Service gap analysis. Programming proposals. 373 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 12 2015/16 Outcome Age appropriate programming developed to provide family opportunities such as kids’ club and parents’ night out. Status Implemented Kids Club and Parents Night Out. Restriped gym floor for multi-sport programming. GOAL Provide a fun and memorable recreational experience for families at the 2016 Big Bunny 5K. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 10% increase in participation N/A On Track Curently falling short. Strategy Investigate different online survey options to increase awareness and identify improvements for the event. Measure Develop appropriate program modifications to improve family experience. Survey prior to and following implementation. Metric Survey results. 2015/16 Outcome Big Bunny fun run receives positive press, user-generated social media accolades. Participation grows year after year. Status Coordinated with CEEF 5K and Super Heroes 5K for shared and targeted marketing. Implementing new amenities at events to improve experience. To date, enrollment numbers are down by 20% compared to 2015. Ongoing marketing strategies are being utilized. GOAL Introduce foot golf at the BBF golf course. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter 8% increase in participation. N/A Complete Strategy Target participation at BBF golf course to those who don't currently use the facility (i.e. after school youth league). 374 Recreation and Community Services - Key Performance Measures by Division Tracked Changes Version 13 Measure Develop list of groups currently using site. Develop list of prospective users. Outreach to all. Track site use prior to and following outreach. Track outreach channels. Metric Site use. Outreach metrics - number of messages developed, shared; click-throughs. 2015/16 Outcome Expand partnerships with youth and adult groups (AYSO, Apple, etc.) to market programs. Customer notification of specials, events, shared via social media. Status Foot Golf Kick-off on 7/4/15. Chamber promotion currently underway for October/November 2015. AYSO promotion planned for November/December. SENIOR PROGRAMS GOAL Expand membership and existing member satisfaction. FY 14-15 Adopted 1st Quarter 2nd quarter 3rd quarter 4th quarter Complete marketing plan and develop surveying and tracking tools. N/A On Track On Track Strategy Using effective outreach strategies, informed by the departmental marketing plan, to grow membership by 2 percent per year. Measure Quantity of memberships and renewals measured; Number of membership referrals. Feedback received on services, programs, Center. Metric Number of memberships, renewals, referrals, positive feedback via surveys (online, Comcate, in-person), social media hits. 2015/16 Outcome Implement marketing plan and gather data on memberships, member satisfaction. Status Membership drive starteds October 26November 1. We are trending 1% ahead in membership sales and 93% overall for customer satisfaction rating collected from program evaluations. 375 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1484 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/9/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Proposed Initiative submitted by Kenneth Silvery Tersini regarding the Oaks Shopping Center Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Proposed Initiative B - Draft Resolution ordering preparation of an Elections Code Section 9212 Report C - City Attorney Title and Summary Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject:ProposedInitiativesubmittedbyKennethSilveryTersiniregardingtheOaks Shopping Center AdoptResolutionNo.16-019directingCitystafftoprepareareportontheeffectsoftheOaks InitiativepursuanttoElectionsCodeSection9212andappropriate$150,000.00forsuch purpose CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™376 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3212 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Proposed Initiative submitted by Kenneth Silvery Tersini regarding the Oaks Shopping Center. Recommended Action Adopt a resolution directing City staff to prepare a report on the effects of the Oaks Initiative pursuant to Elections Code Section 9212 and appropriate $150,000.00 for such purpose. Background On February 9, 2016, Kenneth Silvery Tersini (Proponent) submitted to the City Clerk a Notice of Intent to circulate an initiative petition and a request for the City Attorney to prepare the official ballot title and summary. A copy of the proposed initiative measure (“Initiative”) is attached to this report as Attachment A. Pursuant to the Elections Code, the City Attorney subsequently prepared the official title and summary for the Initiative. The official title for the measure is: “Initiative amending Cupertino’s General Plan and Heart of the City Specific Plan to: (1) allow 280,000 square feet of office space, 200 hotel units, and 270 residential units, and a height limit of 88 feet for a mixed-use development project at the Cupertino Oaks Shopping Center (“Property”); (2) exempt the Property from some development standards; and (3) require the City to promptly process and approve an application for a project that includes specified community benefits and is consistent with the terms of the proposed initiative.” The Proponent has until August 22, 2016—which is 180 days from the time he received the official title and summary—to gather and submit the requisite number of signatures to qualify the measure for placement on the ballot. As with the prior initiative submitted by the Cupertino Residents for Better Zoning, under state law, the City Council now has the option, if it so chooses, to direct staff to prepare a report on the effects of the Oaks Initiative. Such reports are authorized by 377 Elections Code section 9212 and are frequently referred to as “9212 Reports.” The purpose of 9212 Reports is to enable elected officials and the community to obtain a thorough understanding of the potential fiscal, legal, and other impacts of proposed initiatives. A 9212 Report may be ordered at any time during the period that the Initiative is being circulated for signatures, or alternatively, at any time up until the City Council is presented with the City Clerk’s certification that the proponents have submitted sufficient signatures to qualify the measure for placement on the ballot. Discussion The Elections Code grants city councils broad discretion whether to order preparation of a 9212 Report and what topics to cover in such a report. Specifically, section 9212 provides that the City Council “may refer the proposed initiative measure to any city agency or agencies for a report on any or all of the following: (1) Its fiscal impact. (2) Its effect on the internal consistency of the city’s general and specific plans, including the housing element, the consistency between planning and zoning, and the limitations on city actions under [certain affordable housing and anti-discrimination in housing statutes]. (3) Its effect on the use of land, the impact on the availability and location of housing, and the ability of the city to meet its regional housing needs. (4) Its impact on funding for infrastructure of all types, including, but not limited to, transportation, schools, parks, and open space. The report may also discuss whether the measure would be likely to result in increased infrastructure costs or savings, including the costs of infrastructure maintenance, to current residents and businesses. (5) Its impact on the community’s ability to attract and retain business and employment. (6) Its impact on the uses of vacant parcels of land. (7) Its impact on agricultural lands, open space, traffic congestion, existing business districts, and developed areas designated for revitalization; [and] (8) Any other matters the legislative body requests to be in the report.” Elections Code § 9212(a) (emphasis added). The Elections Code gives the Council broad discretion when to order such a report. It may do so now, or at any time during the circulation of the Oaks Initiative. 378 Alternatively, the Council could wait to see if the Oaks Initiative qualifies for the ballot and then order preparation of the report, or decide not to proceed with this analysis. However, any such report must be presented to the Council no later than 30 days after the City Council meeting at which the City Clerk certifies the Oaks Initiative has qualified for the ballot. Elections Code § 9212(b). After receiving the report, and in the event that the Initiative qualifies for the ballot, the Council would then have the option of either adopting the Oaks Initiative exactly as proposed, or ordering it placed on the ballot. Staff recommends that the Council order preparation of a Section 9212 Report and that it do so now in order to ensure that staff has the maximum amount of time to retain any necessary consultants and prepare a thorough analysis of the Oaks Initiative’s impacts. Staff further recommends that the Council direct that the report address each of the specific items identified in Elections Code section 9212, to the extent applicable, and any other specific matters the Council desires to be discussed. In addition, in order assist with the timely preparation of the report and to perform certain types of analyses that require additional expertise, staff recommends that the Council authorize the City Manager to retain appropriate consultants. Based on its preliminary review of the Oaks Initiative, staff presently envisions that the primary consultant would be one that specializes in environmental analysis. Fiscal Impact Staff recommends that the Council authorize the City Manager to spend up to $150,000 to retain the necessary economic, environmental, and legal consultants to help prepare the Report and appropriate these funds. Sustainability Impact: There is no sustainability impact for the preparation of the report. _____________________________________ Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A - Proposed Initiative B - Draft Resolution Ordering Preparation of an Elections Code Section 9212 Report C – City Attorney Title and Summary 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PREPARE A REPORT ON THE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED INITIATIVE ENTITLED, “INITIATIVE AMENDING CUPERTINO’S GENERAL PLAN AND HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN TO: (1) ALLOW 280,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE, 200 HOTEL UNITS, AND 270 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AND A HEIGHT LIMIT OF 88 FEET FOR A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT THE CUPERTINO OAKS SHOPPING CENTER (“PROPERTY”); (2) EXEMPT THE PROPERTY FROM SOME DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND (3) REQUIRE THE CITY TO PROMPTLY PROCESS AND APPROVE AN APPLICATION FOR A PROJECT THAT INCLUDES SPECIFIED COMMUNITY BENEFITS AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED INITIATIVE”; AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE REPORT WHEREAS, on February 9, 2016, Kenneth Silvery Tersini submitted to the City Clerk a Notice of Intent to circulate an initiative petition (“Oaks Initiative”) and a request for the City Attorney to prepare the official ballot title and summary; and WHEREAS, on February 24, 2016, the City Attorney prepared the Title and Summary for the Oaks Initiative and provided it to the proponents; and WHEREAS, Elections Code section 9212 authorizes the City Council to direct City staff to prepare a report on the impacts of the Initiative, including seven specified types of impacts as well as on “any other matter” that the City Council requests to be included in the report; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that such a report would provide valuable information about the Oaks Initiative to the Council and to all interested residents of the City; and WHEREAS, the preparation of an Elections Code section 9212 report is not a project under provisions and requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, together with related State CEQA Guidelines (collectively, "CEQA"), in that this is administrative action which does not involve a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the physical environment; and; NOW THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED: 389 Resolution No. 16- Page 2 1. The City Council directs City staff to : a. Prepare a Report on the effects of the Oaks Initiative pursuant to Elections Code section 9212, addressing each of the impacts specified in subsection (a)(1)-(7) of that section, to the extent applicable, as well as any other items identified by the City Council; and b. Retain, at the direction of the City Manager, any consultants that the City Manager determines are necessary to complete the Report, in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00; and c. Present the Report to the City Council no later than the latest date authorized by Elections Code section 9212(b); and 2. The City of Cupertino’s Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 is hereby amended to appropriate $150,000.00 for the preparation of the Report. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this ___ date of March, 2016, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ___________________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Barry Chang, Mayor, City of Cupertino 390 1 CITY ATTORNEY’S BALLOT TITLE AND SUMMARY FOR PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUBMITTED ON FEBRUARY 9, 2016 TITLE: Initiative amending Cupertino’s General Plan and Heart of the City Specific Plan to: (1) allow 280,000 square feet of office space, 200 hotel units, and 270 residential units, and a height limit of 88 feet for a mixed-use development project at the Cupertino Oaks Shopping Center (“Property”); (2) exempt the Property from some development standards; and (3) require the City to promptly process and approve an application for a project that includes specified community benefits and is consistent with the terms of the proposed initiative. SUMMARY: As required by State law, the City of Cupertino’s General Plan establishes permissible land uses, maximum development densities, and intensities for all properties within the City. The City recently completed a multi-year planning effort for its new General Plan, Community Vision 2015 – 2040, guiding development through 2040. The City has also adopted several specific plans, which provide additional development guidance for certain areas of the City. The eight-acre Property, bounded by State Route 85, Stevens Creek Boulevard, and Mary Avenue, is within the Heart of the City Specific Plan. The proposed initiative amends the City’s General Plan and the Heart of the City Specific Plan including to: (1) add an additional 280,000 square feet of office space and an additional 200 hotel rooms to the development permitted within the Heart of the City area exclusively for the Property; (2) change the “Maximum Residential Density” for the Property from “25 units per acre” to a provision allowing 270 residential units; (3) exempt the Property from the 1:1 slope line setback requirement; (4) increase the maximum allowable building height from 45 feet to 88 feet and change the land use designation and zoning to allow office uses; (5) remove the Neighborhood Center designation; (6) allow for “parcelization” (i.e., the division of the property into smaller parcels that may then be re-sold) of the Property; (7) remove the requirement that the Property contain a “substantial retail component”; 391 2 (8) remove restrictions on the percentages of certain uses allowed along Stevens Creek Boulevard and the rear of buildings; and (9) reduce the percentage of the required common outdoor space that must be landscaped. The initiative states that its intent is to revitalize the Oaks Shopping Center with a mixed use project that would generate an estimated $2.5 million in new annual tax revenues and an additional $8 million worth of specified community benefits, such as funds for construction of schools, public facilities, and transportation, and affordable housing in excess of City requirements. It directs the City to promptly review a development application that is generally consistent with the initiative’s attached “Site Plan” and promptly approve a development permit and development agreement that would require the landowner to provide community benefits and amenities in substantial conformance with those specified. The initiative, which has no expiration date, states that the General Plan and Heart of the City Specific Plan provisions it amends could be amended by the voters or, “upon application of the landowner”, by the City Council. 392 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1485 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:2/9/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Certification B - Letter from proponents Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction; defer a decision on whether to place the measure on the November 8, 2016 ballot until after the 9212 Report on the Initiative is completed CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™393 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3223 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: March 1, 2016 Subject Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction. Recommended Action Receive the Certification of Sufficiency for the Initiative petition submitted by Cupertino Residents for Sensible Zoning Action Committee and provide direction; defer a decision on whether to adopt the Initiative or place it on the November 8, 2016, ballot until after the 9212 Report on the Initiative is completed. Discussion On February 2, 2016, the proponents filed an Initiative petition proposing to amend Cupertino’s General Plan to limit redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District, limit building heights and lot coverages in areas throughout the City, establish new setbacks and building planes on major thoroughfares, and require voter approval for any changes to these provisions. The Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters examined the signatures for verification pursuant to the Elections Code and has certified the results as follows: Raw Signatures: 4,204 Percent Examined 100% Signatures Valid 3,759 Required Number of Signatures: Total Voters: 26,866 10% (Regular Election) 2,686 15% (Special Election) 4,029 The complete Registrar’s Certification of Sufficiency (Certification) is attached to this staff report as Attachment A. The Certification indicates that the proponents have submitted a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify the measure for placement 394 on the ballot at the City’s next regular election, which is the November 8, 2016, general election. The proponents have requested that the City Council instead place the measure on the ballot for the June 7, 2016, special election. See Attachment B. However, the proponents did not submit the requisite number of valid signatures to qualify for a special election. As set forth in the Registrar’s certification, the proponents needed 4,029 valid signatures (15% of the 26,866 registered voters) for a special election. They submitted 3,759 valid signatures. The requirement to submit the measure at a regular —as opposed to a special—election comes from the mandatory language of Elections Code Section 1405(b). This section provides that: “The election for a municipal or district initiative that qualifies pursua nt to Section 9215 or 9311 shall be held at the jurisdiction’s next regular election occurring not less than 88 days after the date of the order of election.” Elec. Code § 1405(b) (emphasis added). Pursuant to its Municipal Code, the City’s regular elect ion dates are held at the November election date of even-numbered years. C.M.C. §2.04.005; see also Elections Code § 348 (defining “regular election”). Where a proposed initiative measure contains sufficient signatures to qualify for a regular election, the City Council has three options. It can: (1) adopt the initiative exactly as proposed, either at the regular meeting at which the certification of the signatures is presented, or within ten days after the certification is presented; (2) submit the initiative exactly as proposed, to the voters at the City’s next regularly scheduled election; or (3) order a report pursuant to Elections Code section 9212 (or await completion of a previously ordered report), and “when the report is presented” take one of the first two steps. On January 19, 2016, Council adopted a Resolution ordering preparation of the 9212 Report. The Report is due 30 days after the Certification of Sufficiency, or March 31, 2016. The time authorized by Council is necessary to ensure that the report is not only comprehensive, but also accurate. Staff recommends that the City Council schedule a special meeting during the last week of March, 2016 to receive the Report (and public comment) and decide whether to adopt the Initiative or order it placed on the November 8, 2016 ballot. Sustainability Impact No sustainability impact. 395 Fiscal Impact The City's next General Municipal Election will be held on November 8, 2016. The cost of a consolidated election to include this Initiative is estimated at $34,000 for the base cost for City Council vacancies plus an additional $35,350 per ballot measure. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Approved for Submission by: David Brandt, City Manager Attachments: A – Certification B – Letter from proponents 396 County of Santa Clara Registrar of Voters I 555 Berger Drive, Bldg. 2 San Jose, CA 951 12 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 6l 1360, San Jose, CA 95161-1360 l(408) 299-VOTE (s683) l(866) 430-voTE (8683) FAX: l(408) 998-7314 ww.sccvore.org February 23,2016 Ms. Grace Schmidt City Clerk, City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: Initiative amending Cupertino's General Plan to limit redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District, limit building heights and lot coverages in areas throughout the City, establish new setbacks and building planes on major thoroughfares, and require voter approval for any changes to these provisions. Dear City Clerk Schmidt: The initiative petition submitted to our office on February 2,2016 contained 4,204 signatures. Based on the 26,866 registered voters in the City of Cupertino, as of the February 10, 2015 report of registration to the Secretary of State, the petition needs 2,686 (100/o) or 4,029 (15o/o). Your jurisdiction requested that the Registrar of Voters examine and verify 100% of the signatures. The Registrar of Voters verified 4,204 of the signatures filed in accordance with Elections Code Section 9114, within 30 days from the date of filing of the petition and from the records of registration ascertain whether or not the petition is signed by the requisite number of voters. The verification results of 100% of the signatures submitted found 3,759 signatures were valid. Your jurisdiction required 2,686 (10%) or 4,029 (15o/o), therefore the petition is sufficient. lf you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (408) 282-3009. Saenz , Election Division Coordinator Voter Registration Division County of Santa Clara js:local jur ltr req 100 JobD31 Board ofSupervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Dave Cortese, Ken Yeager, S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jeffrey V. Smith /ai\t!, Sincerely, 397 Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters CLERK'S CERTIFICATE TO INITIATIVE PETITION l, SHANNON BUSHEY, Registrar of Voters of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, hereby certify: That the "lnitiative amending Cupertino's General Plan to limit redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District, limit building heights and lot coverages in areas throughout the City, establish new setbacks and building planes on major thoroughfares, and require voter approval for any changes to these provisions" Initiative measure has been filed with this office on February 2,2Q16 That said petition consists of 111 sections; That each section contains signatures purporting to be the signatures of qualified electors of this county; That attached to this petition at the time it was filed was an affidavit purporting to be the affidavit of the person who solicited the signatures, and containing the dates between which the purported qualified electors signed this petition; That the affiant stated his or her own qualification, that he or she had solicited the signatures upon that section, that all of the signatures were made in his or her presence, and that to the best of his or her knowledge and belief each signature to that section was the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be; That after the proponent filed this petition I verified the required number of signatures by examining the records of registration in this county, current and in effect at the respective purportive dates of such of signing, to determine what number of qualified electors signed the petition, and from that examination I have determined the following facts regarding this petition: 1. Number of unverified signatures filed by proponent 4.2042. Number of signatures verified 4.204 a. Number of signatures found SUFFICIENT 3.759 b. Number of signatures found NOT SUFFICIENT 445 1. NOT SUFFICIENT because DUPLICATE 43 lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official sealthis 23'd day of February 2016. ShannonBushey of VotersRegi JOBD31 398 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:116-1369 Name: Status:Type:Reports by Council and Staff Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/14/2016 City Council On agenda:Final action:3/1/2016 Title:Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council3/1/20161 Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Report on Committee assignments and general comments CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/24/2016Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™400