The URL can be used to link to this page

14040043CITY OF CUPERTINO BUILDING PERMIT BUILDING ADDRESS: 10420 BUBB RD CONTRACTOR: SC BUILDERS INC PERMIT NO: 14040043 OWNER'S NAME: HOME OF CHRIST CH CUPERTINO LLC 910 THOMPSON PL DATE ISSUED: 08/07/2014 OWNER'S PHONE: SUNNYVALE, CA 94085 PHONE NO: (408)328-0688 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION JOB DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ �� -7 ^ � 13 `7 APPLE- SITE IMPROVEMENTS, ADA UPGRADES, INSTALL License Class Lia # EVC CHARGING STATIONS Contractor SL(>(�,QF� 5 Date REV # I - RELOCATE POSITION OF EV CHARGERS - issued 12/3/14 I hereby affirm that 1 am licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business & Professions Code and that my license is in full force and effect. I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following two declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for Worker's Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 ofthe Labor Code, for the Sq. Ft Floor Area: Valuation: $550000 performance of the work for which this permit is issued. e and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 ofthe Labor Code, for the performance ofthe work for which this APN Number: 35720038.00 Occupancy Type: permit is issued. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is PERMIT EXPIRES IF WORK IS NOT STARTED correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating WITHIN I8U DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE OR to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentione property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save 180 DAYS FROM ED INSPECTION. indemnify and keep har less the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, _ costs, and expenses ich ma ccrue again said City in consequence of the v / granting oft is r it. A Wally the licant understands and will comply Issued _ Date: with all non so re ulati p ie Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 9.18. RE -ROOFS: C� Signature Date 1201 All roofs shall be inspected prior to any roofing material being installed. If a roof is installed without first obtaining an inspection, I agree to remove all new materials for inspection. ❑ OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION Signature of Applicant: Date: 1 hereby affirm that 1 am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for one of the following two reasons: ALL ROOF COVERINGS TO BE CLASS "A" OR BETTER 1, as owner ofthe property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code) 1, as owner ofthe property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE construct the project (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code). 1 have read the hazardous materials requirements under Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505, 25533, and 25534. I will I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one ofthe following three maintain compliance with the Cupertin Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and the declarations: Health & Safety Code, Section 25532 should re or handle hazardous I have and will maintain a Certificate of Consent to self -insure for Worker's material. Additionally, should us quip t r devices ich emit hazardous Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the air contaminants as defined b th ay A it Qualit anagement District I performance ofthe work for which this permit is issued. will maintain compliance wi a Cup ' OM lei ode, Chapter 9.12 and I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 ofthe Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this the Health & Safety Code, tons 25 25 �� 4 Owner or authorized a n . Date: permit is issued. I certify that in the performance ofthe work for which this permit is issued, 1 shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Worker's Compensation laws of California. If, after making this certificate of exemption, I CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY become subject to the Worker's Compensation provisions ofthe Labor Code, I must 1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. work's for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ C.) Lender's Name APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Lender's Address I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, ARCHITECT'S DECLARATION costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence ofthe I understand my plans shall be used as public records. granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply with all non -point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section Licensed Professional 9.18. Signature Date CUPERTINO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3228 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • building(a-cupertino.org U NEW CONSTRUCTION IJ ADDITION LJ ALTERATION / TI REVISION / DEFERRED ORIGINAL PERMIT # PROJECT ADDRESS 0,4? Q� 66 r[ no ^ D APN # OWNERNAME OME dFCRiZ(ST PtQnNO PHONE r2 5Q1 784-144 E-MAIL STREET ADDRESS AREA CITY, STATE, ZIP ❑' MAJOR ,' FAX CONTACT NAME PHONE KITCHEN E-MAIL STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP I FAX ❑ OWNER ❑ OWNER -BUILDER ❑ OWNER AGENT ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ CONTRACTOR AGENT ❑ ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ DEVELOPER ❑ TENANT CONTRACTOR NAME C AJ ^ (� ` LICENSE NUMBER Vl l cl( LICENSE TYPE 2 BUS. LIC # COMPANY NAME SG bull -068 W E -MA 11TH S .0 FAX STREET ADDRESS /�t +W O.MnOw \�Vjl�•, CITY, STATE, PHONE :SVNNYVALGf940F� ARCHITECT/ENGNEER NAME LICENSE NUMBER BUS LIC, #V COMPANY NAME 1\ v I F!L K V fl 1 � W A `/ I J r E-MAIL FAX STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK EvISRA Q CLrYAMMNJ EDF GV USE I TYPE I OCC. I SQ.FT. I VALUATION (S) EXISTG NEW FLOOR DEMO OVER-THE-COUNTER` TOTAL ❑ BUILDINGPLANREVIEW El EY LJPLANNING PLAN REVIEW - ❑ .- STAN AREA AREA AREA NET AREA ❑' MAJOR ,' ❑ SANITARY, SENNERDISTRICT, ; BATHROOM KITCHEN OTHER REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA PORCH AREA DECK AREA TOTAL DECKTORCH AREA GARAGE AREA: DETACH iJ ATTACH # DWELLING UMTS: IS A SECOND UNIT ❑ YES SECOND STORY ❑YES BEING ADDED? ❑NO ADDITION? [3NO PRE -APPLICATION ❑ YES IF YES, PROVIDE COPY OF IS THE BLDG AN ❑ YES RECEIVED BY , ^ VALUATION: PLANNING APPL # ❑ NO PLANNING APPROVAL LETTER EICHLER HOME?NO TTOTAL By my signature below, I certify to each of e following: I e prope mer or authorized agent to act on the property owner's behalf. I have read this application and the information I ha v pro ided is correct. a read t escription of Work and verify it is accurate. I agree to comply with all applicable local ordinances and state laws relating t bu' ing const ti o repres tatives of Cupertino to enter the above -identified p operty for inspection purposes. Signature of App]icandAgent: Date: SUPPLEI /rTAL INFORMATION REQUIRED New SFD or Multifamily dwellings: Apply for demolition permit for existing building(s). Demolition permit is required prior to issuance of building permit for new building. Commercial Bldgs: Provide a completed Hazardous Materials Disclosure form if any Hazardous Materials are being used as part of this project. Copy of Planning Approval Letter or Meeting With Planning prior to submittal of Building Permit application. PLAN CIMCKTYPE" ROUTING SLIP OVER-THE-COUNTER` ❑ BUILDINGPLANREVIEW El EY LJPLANNING PLAN REVIEW - ❑ .- STAN ❑ PUBLIC WORKS - .LARGE" ' ❑ FIRE DEPT ❑' MAJOR ,' ❑ SANITARY, SENNERDISTRICT, ; D ENVIRONMENTALHEALTA BldgApp 2011.doc revised 06/21111 CITY OF CUPERTINO FEE ESTIMATOR - BUILDING DIVISION ADDRESS: 10420 bubb rd FEE DATE: 12/03/2014 REVIEWED BY: melissa APN: 357 20 038 BP#: 14040043 tVALUATION: Iso PERMIT TYPE: Building Permit 0.0 PLAN CHECK TYPE: Addition PRIMARY USE: SFD or Duplex PME Plan Check: $0.00 PENTAMATION PERMIT TYPE: 1GENRES i WORK REV # 1 - RELOCATE POSITION OF EV CHARGERS - ISSUED 12/3/14 SCOPE T0.0 hrs NOTE: This estimate does not include fees due to other Departments (i.e. Planning, Public Works, Fire, Sanitary Sewer District, School District, etc.). These fees are based on the preliminary information available and are only an estimate. Contact the Dept for addn'l info. FEE ITEMS (Fee Resolution 11-053 Fff 7'1/13) FEE QTY/FEE MISC ITEMS Plan Check Fee: Hourly Only? 0 Yes Q No $0.00 hours Plan Check, Hourly $143.00 ISTPLNCK Suppl. PC Fee: ) Reg. Q OT 0.0 hrs $0.00 PME Plan Check: $0.00 Permit Fee: $0.00 Suppl. Insp. Fee:Q Reg. Q OT T0.0 hrs $0.00 PME Unit Fee: $0.00 PME Permit Fee: $0.00 Work Without Permit? Q Yes ) No $0.00 Advanced Planning Fee: $0.00 Select a Non -Residential E) Building or Structure 0 Strom Motion Fee: $0.00 Select an Administrative Item Bldg, Stds Commission Fee: $0.00 SUBTOTALS: $0.00 $143.00 TOTAL FEE: $143.00 Revised: 10/01/2014 aJ CITY OF CUPERTINO BUILDING PERMIT BUILDING ADDRESS: 10420 BUBB RD CONTRACTOR: XL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO: 14040043 OWNER'S NAME: HOME OF CHRIST CH CUPERTINO LLC 851 BUCKEYE CT DATE ISSUED: 08/07/2014 OWNER'S PHONE: MILPITAS, CA 95035 PHONE NO: (408) 240-6000 ❑ LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION JOB DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL APPLE- SITE IMPROVEMENTS, ADA UPGRADES, INSTALL License Class Lic. # '1 lob talo EVC CHARGING STATIONS Contractor �' I. v r��Er�S , 13 tr Date I hereby affirm that 1 am licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business & Professions Code and that my license is in full force and effect. I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following two declarations: l have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -insure for Worker's Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the Sq. Ft Floor Area: Valuation: 5550000 performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this APN Number: 35720038.00 Occupancy Type: permit is issued. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is PERMIT EXPIRES IF WORK IS NOT STARTED correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating WITHIN 180 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE OR to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save 180 DAYS FROM LAST CALLED INSPECTION. indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the ��n ^ L f fi, / L G Date: 7' granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply Issued by: /7/ 'z / f� C/ I with all non -point source regulat' ns per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 9.18. RE -ROOFS: Signature Date &(-0 IW All roofs shall be inspected prior to any roofing material being installed. If a roof is installed without first obtaining an inspection, I agree to remove all new materials for inspection. ❑ OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION Signature of Applicant: Date: I hereby affirm that 1 am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for one of the following two reasons: ALL ROOF COVERINGS TO BE CLASS "A" OR BETTER I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code) L as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE construct the project (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code). I have read the hazardous materials requirements under Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505, 2.5533, and 25534. I will I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following three maintain compliance with the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and the declarations: Health & Safety Code, Section 25532(a) should I store or handle hazardous 1 have and will maintain a Certificate of Consent to self -insure for Worker's material. Additionally, should 1 use equipment or devices which emit hazardous Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the air contaminants as defined by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District 1 performance of the work for which this permit is issued. will maintain compliance with the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by the Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505, 25_ and 25534. Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this Owner or authorized agent: Date: 1 iLk permit is issued. I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, 1 shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Worker's Compensation laws of California. If, after making this certificate of exemption, l CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY become subject to the Worker's Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, I must I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. work's for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ C.) Lender's Name APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Lender's Address I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, ARCHITECT'S DECLARATION costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the I understand my plans shall be used as public records. granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply with all non -point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section Licensed Professional 9.18. Signature Date CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 CUPERTINO (408) 777-3228 • FAX (4108) 777-3333 • buildinq�cupertino.org N NF.W CONSTRUCTION � ADDITION I 1 ALTERATION / TI F-1 REVISION / DEFERRED �a 1 ORIGINAL PERMIT # ROJECTADDRESS Road Bubb Roa UU U �� APN#30 ✓ co* 57.2 JJ L OWNER NAME PHONE E-MAIL STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP FAX CONTACT NAME Nektarios Matheou PHONE 408.727.6665 E-MA'Lnmatheou@kierwright.com STREETADDRESS3350 Scott Blvd. CITY, STATE,z'PSanta Clara, CA 95054 F`408.727.5641 ❑ OWNER ❑ OWNER -BUILDER ❑ OWNERAGENT ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ CONTRACTOR AGENT ❑ ARCHITECT 0 ENGINEER ❑ DEVELOPER ❑ TENANT CONTRACTOR NAME Greg Burda LICENSE NUMBER LICENSE TYPE BUS. LIC # COMPANY NAME S'C A'Lgburda@scbuildersinc.Corn ? FAX STREET ADDRESS 910 Thompson Place I CITY, STATE, ZIP Sunnyvale, CA 94085 PHONE 408.328.0688 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER NAME LICENSE NUMBER BUS. LIC # COMPANY NAME E-MAIL FAX STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK Sitework improvements, ADA upgrades. EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE CONSTR. TYPE # STORIES USE TYPE OCC. SQ.FT. VALUATION ($) EXISTG NEW FLOOR DEMO TOTAL AREA AREA AREA NET AREA BATHROOM KITCHEN OTHER REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA PORCH AREA TOTAL DECK/PORCH AREA GARAGE AREA: DETACH =AREADECK ❑ ATTACH # DWELLING UNITS IS A SECOND UNIT []YESSECOND STORY ❑YES BEING ADDED? MNO ADDITION? ❑NO PRE -APPLICATION ❑YES IF YES, PROVIDE COPY OF IS THE BLDG AN ❑ YES RECEIV TAL V LLnUATI PLANNING APPL # ❑NO PLANNING APPROVAL LETTER EICHLER HOME? E] NO �V. C)OO By my signature below, I certify to each of the following: 1 am the property owner or authorized ag6ntAkct on the property owner's behalf.- I have read this application and the information I have provided is,9&ecL I have read the I)tscription of Work and ver* it is accurate. 1 agree to comply with all applicable local ordinances and state laws relating to building codstruction. I authorize representatives of Cupertino to enter the at ove-iidentifiyd propr for inspection purposes. Signature of Applicant/Agent: �• /� �— — — �' — Dater SUPPLEMENTAir INFORMATION REQUIRED PLAN CHECK TYPE ROUTING SLIP I New SFD or Multifamily dwellings: Apply for demolition permit for ❑ OVER-THE-COUNTER ❑ BUILDING PLAN REVIEW existing building(s). Demolition permit is required prior to issuance of building permit for new building. ❑ EXPRESS ❑ PLANNING PLAN REVIEW Commercial Bldgs: Provide a completed Hazardous Materials Disclosure ❑ STANDARD ❑ PUBLIC WORKS form if any Hazardous Materials are being used as part of this project. ❑ LARGE ❑ FIRE DEPT Copy of Planning Approval Letter or Meeting with Planning prior to ❑ MAJOR ❑SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT submittal of Building Permit application. ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 11dg1pp 2011.doc revised 06/21/11 CITY OF CUPERTINO Fm -M FEE ESTIMATOR — BUILDING DIVISION ADDRESS: 1041WBUBB RD FEE DATE: 04/07/2014 REVIEWED BY: MENDEZ APN: BP#:104 5 hours $695.00 `VALUATION: 1$550,000 PERMIT TYPE: Building Permit Suppl. PC Fee: (F) Reg. 0 OT PLAN CHECK TYPE: Tenant Improvement PRIMARYPENTAMATION USE: Commercial BuildingT PME Plan Check: $0.00 PERMIT TYPE: 1GENC0 � WORK APPLE- SITE IMPROVEMENTS ADA UPGRADES Permit Fee: Hourly Only? ® Yes Q No SCOPE Suppl. Insp. Fee:) Reg. Q OT 1 0.0 1 hrs NOTE: This estimate does not include fees due to other Departments (i. e. Planning, Public Works, Fire, Sanitary Sewer District, School District, etc). These fees are based on the preliminary information available and are only an estimate. Contact the Dept for addn'1 info. FEE ITEMS (Fee Resolulion 11-053 EIT'17,1131 FEE QTY/FEE MISC ITEMS Plan Check Fee: Hourly Only? 0 Yes Q No $0.00 5 hours $695.00 Plan Check, Hourly 1sTPLNcx Suppl. PC Fee: (F) Reg. 0 OT 0.0 hrs $0.00 PME Plan Check: $0.00 Permit Fee: Hourly Only? ® Yes Q No $0.00 Suppl. Insp. Fee:) Reg. Q OT 1 0.0 1 hrs $0.00 PME Unit Fee: $0.00 PME Permit Fee: $0.00 7T_ Work Without Permit? 0 Yes (D No $0.00 Advanced Planning l=ee:$0.00 Select a Non -Residential Building or Structure E) i Strong Motion Fee: IBSEISMICO $115.50 5.0 hrs $695.00 Inspections ISTINSP Inspection, Hourly Bldg Stds Commission Fee: IBCBSC $22.00 SUBTOTALS:$137.50 $1,390.001 TOTAL FEE: 1 $1,527.50 Revised: 04/01/2014 CUPERTINO to-'� sq CONTRACTOR / SUBCONTRACTOR LIST Building Department City Of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: 408-777-3228 Fax: 408-777-3333 JOB ADDRESS: / U4- 20 19U1316' /� of}( ' PERMIT # l 4-0 +004,3 OWNER'S NAME: /40me OtIrCHRIIST14411? -1 PHONE #105R/ 302 (T -OG GENERAL CONTRACTOR$ 4)11Or,4eS' //L/6, BUSINESS LICENSE # =' `=1 0 % G ADDRESS: q 72 Q^DS5061 101-46r— CITY/ZIPCODE:S(/N AAE *Our municipal code requires all businesses working in the city to have a City of Cupertino business license. NO BUILDING FINAL OR FINAL OCCUPANCY INSPECTION(S) WILL BE SCHEDULED UNTIL THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS HAVE OBTAINED A CITY OF CUPERTINO BUSINESS LICENSE. I am not using any subcontractors: Signature Please check applicable subcontractors and complete the following information: Date Owner / Contractor Signature i Daie SUBCONTRACTOR BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS LICENSE # Cabinets & Millwork /�/ //-I --- " Cement Finishing 77FCF C? AJ j 1 Electrical Excavation 7;eC/-/C0/\/ T Fencing N//4 ---- Flooring / Carpeting lvllq i Linoleum /Woodf /� Glass / Glazing /V114 Heating Insulation- �= Landscaping TFCI-4COA/ Lathing IV11 l �-- Masonry /li/%) -- - Painting / Wallpaper M 4 6AIvA4 OR YWA�- Paving A///4- l/ /4"Plastering Plastering /'U A --- Plumbing %'VIA - -- Roofing s /"✓ / _. Septic Tank Sheet Metal IVIA - Sheet Rock Tile --Allt - - Owner / Contractor Signature i Daie CUPERTINO ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION ALBERT SALVADOR, P.E., C.B.O., BUILDING OFFICIAL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3228 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • build ing(a.cupertino.org BACKGROUND The Tri -Chapter Uniform Code Committee (TUCC) approved the Electric Vehicle (EV) charging system guidelines on August 12, 2010. This is the second part of the guideline for cornmercial and multi -family electric vehicle charging system. The employment of electrical vehicles will greatly help to reduce the air pollutants to meet the State and Federal emission targets. Efficient permitting and inspection for EV electric charging system will help encourage the use of EV in California. Currently, there are no clear requirements in the building code regarding accessibility for the installation of EV charging stations. A policy will provide consistency in EV permit approval in the Tri - chapter area. CODE REFERENCE(S): • 2013 California Building Code (CBC) • 2013 California Electrical Code (CEC) • 2013 California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen) • Underwriters Laboratory (UL) listed charging system PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: An alternate energy permit is required for an EV charging system. The following is a list of requirements needed to obtain this type of permit: 1. Provide a completed building permit application. 2. Provide three sets of completely dimensioned site plans showing the location of all new and existing EV Charging stations on the site. Show the required path of travel from the accessible EV Charging station to the accessible entrance of the closest building. The path of travel shall be along an accessible path 3. The EV parking stall shall have a maximum 2% slope and cross -slope. 4. EV system with UL listed number or other approved nationally recognized testing agency shall be provided on plan. 5. Identify if site is in the flood zone. If so, charging station shall be elevated or designed according to the flood requirement. 6. Provide electrical load calculations for the charging stations. New dedicated branch circuits from the central meter distribution panel to the charging station may be required. 7. Planning approval may be required. 8. EV charging systems installed within a single family or multi -family dwelling garage governed by a Homeowner's Association shall provide a letter of approval from the HOA. EVChargingStations_2014.doc revised 01115114 ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: If an EV charging station is provided on a site, the minimum number of accessible charging stations required for that site is one. The accessible EV charging station parking space shall not be counted as one of the required accessible parking spaces required by the CBC, because the space is allowed to be used by non -disabled persons. The size of the accessible EV charging station parking stall and its access aisle and other accessible requirements shall be in compliance with the current CBC for van accessible parking stalls, except that it need not be striped or provided with signage as required for accessible parking spaces. An informational sign shall be posted with suggested wording: "Parking for Electrical Vehicle charging only". Suggested wording for the accessible space: "Accessible parking for Electrical Vehicle charging only". The accessible charging station equipment shall meet all applicable reach range provisions and accessible path under the current CBC accessibility requirement. The EV charging parking space(s) may be counted towards the nurnber of required low- emitting/fuel-efficient parking in the CGBSC. OTHER REQUIREMENTS: • Charging system equipment, EVSE (Electric Vehicle Service Equipment), installed inside individual garage of a single family or multi -family dwellings shall follow TUCC policy #17. • Charging stations installed outside the multi -family dwelling buildings shall follow this guideline. • Publicly available charging system shall follow this guideline. But lighting and shelter are important consideration at public sites. • Identify if a second electric meter is required to be installed because of electric utility rate for EV charging. • EVSE shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's guideline and shall be suitable for the environment (indoor/outdoor). • Manufacturer installation guideline shall be available for the inspector at the site. EVChargingStations_2014.doc revised 01/15/14 ACCESSIBLE PARKING FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING ONLY ALLOWED FOR DISABLE AND] NON -DISABLE PERSON Accessible ramp if required PARKING FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING ONLY SAMPLE EV CHARGING PARKING SPACES EVChargingStations_2014.doc revised 01/15/14 Arbor yell. professional tree management "aA. rluiliry ! 2 "'I rul 1 4 / f -V��/o 1-3 YV Bubb 14 Tree Inventory 10420 Bubb Road Cupertino, California Prepared for: Apple Inc. CZ) Prepared by: Samuel Oakley ISA Certified Arborist WE -9474A CL V Arbor ell. ssional tree management Januar';' 1.". 2 011 n Table of Contents Title Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 1 Assignment & Scope 1 Method 2 Tree Count & Composition 2 Suitability for Preservation 3 Discussion 5 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions 8 Exhibit 1 — Figures & Tables 9 Exhibit 2 — Inventory Matrix 15 Exhibit 3 — Inventory Map 16 III Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A Arborwell Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment 1/14/2014 1 Summary Apple is preparing to implement capital improvements at the Bubb 14 campus and performed an assessment of all trees on the campus. The tree assessment consisted of thirty-eight (38) trees. All 38 trees are considered protected trees pursuant to Section 14.18.035 of the City of Cupertino's Municipal Code. Twenty-four (24) trees are not suitable for preservation and are recommended for removal. Fourteen (14) individuals are suitable for preservation. Introduction Arborwell was retained to inventory and assess all trees on the property of 10420 Bubb Road in Cupertino, CA (see Figure 1 of Exhibit 1). The inventory of all trees on the property was performed on January 3, 2014 and updated on January 14, 2014. The inventory is in preparation for proposed capital improvements. Included in this report are figures and tables referenced in the report (Exhibit 1), the inventory spreadsheet with tree numbering (Exhibit 2), and site map (Exhibit 3). Assignment & Scope This report intends to describe the state of the trees on the Bubb 14 property as observed on the date of the inventory. Data collected per individual tree for the inventory are as follows: tree number, scientific name, common name, diameter at fifty-four inches (54") above grade, crown height, crown spread, condition percentage, action, and any observational notes (see Exhibit 2). Each of the identified trees was mapped by using a combination of differential global position systems and geographic information systems. Of the data collected in the field, health and structure were combined to give each tree a condition rating, expressed as a percentage. The health of the tree is determined by its current size versus approximate install date, canopy density, coloration, the appearance of any abnormalities or deficiencies and the overall health of the trunk, crown, and visible roots. The structure of the tree was evaluated based on the tree's natural, expected growth habit and form versus current growth habit, as well as the tree's inherent and exhibited structural integrity and deficiencies. Health and condition are subjective and species -dependent. Note that the recommendations in this report are based on visual inspection on the above- ground parts of the tree at the time of the site visit. No soil was removed for below -grade inspection and no aerial inspection was performed. Information in this letter may warrant further investigation as site conditions change over time. 33' Air v, l 1 H.,r CA 9 4 r- 199', E,,_ Qai ,hone Road, r:ea-w .c...., C 053 F,-,-,,, ! b : 0 88. 5-20:9 320-11F R,, R .;CD ,..A_5 .._' .. _ _ �. Samuel Oakley, WE-9474AArbor VY �11 Apple, Inc. - Bubb 14 Tree Assessment Ve, managrmeot 1/14/2014 2 Method The specific tasks performed are as follows: • identify and physically tag the trees on-site; • measure the diameter of the individual at fifty-four inches (54") above grade, rounded to the nearest inch; • estimate crown height and canopy spread; • determine the individual's health and structural integrity and assign a condition rating; • note any significant defects, health issues, or other observational notes; • recommend action; • prepare a written report that presents findings and submit the report via email as a PDF document. Tree Count & Composition During the site visits, a total of thirty-eight (38) trees were quantified on-site. Of the 38 individuals observed on the property, there were ten (10) species (see Tables 1 and 2 of Exhibit 1). Pursuant to Section 14.18.035 of the City of Cupertino's Municipal Code, all individuals are considered protected. Twenty-four (24) trees are recommended for removal based on poor suitability for preservation. Fourteen (14) trees are suitable for preservation. Prior to my January 15, 2014 site inspection for the survey update, Tree #33, a dead coast live oak, had been removed and subsequently, 1 removed it from this report. Specific comments on individual performance are given in the Comments column of the Inventory Matrix (Exhibit 2). 23117 A,, ., rev t., ti 969-8733 1993 Fa` , Bay 0r R o a kedd,,vooc ;=ty A 4,01J3 .,. , 1039 E, Mn _, ., . , v. 1T; A, S ilvi GA 92,06,; V Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A ArborvvelI Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment Pfeseion�! tree managvreM 1/14/2014 3 Suitability for Preservation Each of the Protected Trees has been assigned a condition percentage from 0% to 100% (0% to 20% _ "very poor;" 21 % to 40% _ "poor;" 41 % to 60% _ "moderate;" 61 % to 80% _ "good;" 81 % to 100% _ "excellent"). Condition rating percentages are combined with other criteria and considerations (see below) to identify the overall value of an existing tree on- site and it's suitability for preservation. See Table 3 for a list of suitable candidates for preservation. Preservation Criteria & Considerations The following criteria and considerations were used to determine suitability for preservation: • size/vigor • functional value (shading, screening, etc.) • condition rating • location appropriate • climate adapted • water demand • aesthetic value • long term maintenance • hazard pre -disposition, signs, and symptoms • infrastructure damage observed and/or anticipated • competition and overcrowding with other desired shrubs and trees to be preserved • anticipated length of lifespan Condition Rating Categories Excellent: Exemplary health and structure for species. No individuals were identified as in excellent condition. Good: Some minor deficiencies noted in health and/or structure, with potential for corrective measures to be performed to improve upon condition (including but not limited to fertilizer, pruning, and chemical applications). Six (6) individuals were identified as in good condition and were identified for preservation. • Suitability for Preservation: 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 7Av�r� ACA 94V54c rp{,9.87 1993 Ea,,! Bay-�-oro Road, Rechvooi 'Cly. CA 940,63 3207 F_i _ C r l O's742 Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A Arbor I Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment pmfesy"[ t.Ee Ta,E9gLme�< 1/14/2014 4 Moderate: Higher level and/or incidence of deficiencies noted in health and/or structure, including possible hazardous conditions signs and symptoms observed, with higher corrective measures and input required to improve condition and where applicable, mitigate hazard. Four (4) individuals were identified for removal and six (6) individuals were identified for preservation. • Suitability for Preservation: 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 39 Poor: Significant deficiencies noted in health and/or structure, some irreversible, and may include hazardous condition signs and symptoms observed requiring corrective action. Twenty (20) individuals were identified for removal and two (2) individuals were identified for preservation. • Suitability for Preservation: 18, 19 Very Poor: Includes any of or combination of the following: very low canopy density, major disease signs and symptoms, dying or dead trees, imminent, irreversible hazardous condition present. One (1) dead individual was identified for removal during the January 3, 2014 and had been subsequently removed prior to the January 14, 2014 survey update. 23�7A-,CA ,45 1949", Eas,, Bay!!ore Road. Redwood C� �S�',• `'+ �-x^33 F `33? -5208 Samuel Oakley, WE-9474AArbor well Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment prote,s7Gnal tree marid9emenf 1/14/2014 5 Discussion The Bubb 14 property is an older commercial site that has a diverse group of tree species, having broadleaf -evergreens, conifers, and deciduous trees. Though there is evidence of recent pruning and tree maintenance, the on-site trees, in general, are declining due to deferred maintenance. Heavy compaction during the initial tree installation is likely the culprit for much of the decline exhibited in the onsite trees. Many of the trees on site have been topped and exhibit poor structure. Several individuals are planted in shallow planter beds directly below the building's eve, a poor planting location due to the potential for the tree to outgrow its space. Many of the redwood individuals are exhibiting external stress, likely caused by insufficient irrigation or using reclaimed water as irrigation. Human activity is often the cause of most problems that trees experience. For example, improper planting and pruning of trees, as well as poor care, will often lead to exhibited stress. Applying too much or too little water, especially after planting, may injure roots. Over application of fertilizer can also lead to root injury, or rapid but weak growth, that makes the tree prone to certain insect pests and plant diseases. Mechanical injuries from lawn mowers and weed trimmers can damage tree bark and create the opportunity for invasion by certain disease organisms. Excessive foot or vehicular traffic around trees can destroy the structure of soil leading to compaction of that soil. Compaction reduces the level of oxygen in soil, slows the penetration of water, and hinders the development of roots. Other consequences of human activity, especially air pollution, are a little more difficult to assess and to prevent. From our observations, we have recommended several trees for removal. Along with the removals, we recommended a full soil renovation throughout the entirety of the perimeter and building planters, including rototilling all soil to a depth of eighteen inches (18") and the addition of soil amendments into the root zone. This will encourage deeper rooting, vigorous growth, better performance, and, as a result, less potential for tree mortality. Mulch should be applied and irrigation upgrades should be installed. Selected trees were recommended for removal for the following reasons: Bottle Brush Two (2) individuals were selected for removal: • One (1) individual exhibited a severe lean towards the courtyard gathering area and encroaches on the available space of the aforementioned area. • One (1) individual selected for removal is a multi -stemmed, shrub -like tree of little value, exhibiting poor structure. 33 7 "1 ar A v, i Nwv� � C„ + 945 p ." 8 ' Cin'` 1 13 EaS, E. v7,hor Road. ReOv%,occ C' `J063 V J:J VIJO)1111,,- 1')P L._ ,, Samuel Oakley, WE-9474AArborvvelI Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment professranat tree n=anaidamen. 1/14/2014 6 Chinese Elm One (1) individual has been selected for removal: • A codominant trunk increase the likelihood of failure and is a safety concern. Coast Live Oak One (1) individual has been selected for removal: • The oak individual selected for removal is a multi -stemmed, volunteer of little value (Tree 12), exhibiting poor structure. Coast Redwood Seven (7) individuals have been selected for removal: • The redwood individuals selected for removal have extremely low canopy density due to water -stress possible cause by under -watering or using reclaimed water as irrigation (note: though candidates for removal, proper irrigation will extend the on- site longevity of this species). Crape Myrtle Three (3) individuals have been selected for removal: • The crape myrtle individuals are have outgrown their vertical growing space due to being planted directly beneath the building eve. Eastern Redbud One (1) individual has been selected for removal: • This tree has excessively poor structure due to being topped in the past. Silk Tree Two (2) individuals have been selected for removal: • The excessively poor structure of these individuals is likely a result of being over pruned in the past. 233 7 ANi r H , L A 9 4 5 Ar 1993 Es .[ Bu15j,0 _ Road. Re-ci- ✓oodC", r 940V, n FAx (5 0) 88 55208 3207 H, A _ R R. N cc -A, CA 9577` 1039 E. U =,'t A S-1 A S � M CA 62269 Samuel Oakley, WE-9474AArborvvelI Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment l'et management 1/1412014 7 • The trees have outgrown their growing space due to being constricted within a small, elevated planter box. Sweetg u m Six (6) individuals have been selected for removal: • The selected individuals have had years of topping and poor heading -cuts. • These trees are in serious health/structural decline. • Root damage has increased the potential for whole -tree failure. • This is a very water -needy, shallow rooted tree species and their seedpods present a slip hazard. White Birch Three (3) individuals have been selected for removal: These individuals have experienced years of topping and poor heading -cuts. These trees are declining in health. Exhibiting poor structure due to codominant leaders and are a safety concern. All recommendations are to be performed to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations. In addition, ANSI ZI33.1 Standards and Safety Requirements for Arboriculture Operations are to be explicitly followed. ANSI A300 and ZI33.1 standards are the generally accepted industry standards for tree care practices and safety procedures. ANSI A300 standards unify and take authoritative precedence over all previously existing tree care industry standards and guidelines. X37 r ti 9i- Gi z 'S45 19-93 Ea6�,, y ; or- Rodd, Red oo. CA 9-1063 R4., �_ o _,. _ , L_-195,?42 0 8883 96_.' 3 V Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A Arbor yell. Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment proPe"'cAa, tree la„aq—eM 1/14/2014 8 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions While trees vary in their tolerance to changed conditions, disruption in any form of the environment to which the trees have grown accustomed may result in adverse reaction. Human activity among and near trees is inherently contrary to tree welfare and there are inherent risks associated. The following are limitations to this report: • All information presented herein covers only the trees examined at the area of inspection, and reflects the condition observed of said tree at the time of inspection. • Observations were performed visually without probing, dissecting, coring, or excavation, unless noted above, and in no way shall the observer be held responsible for any defects that could have only been discovered by performing said services in specific area(s) where a defect was located. • No guarantee or warranty is made, expressed or implied, that defects of the trees inspected may not arise in the future. • No assurance can be offered that if the recommendation and precautionary measure are accepted and followed, that the desired result may be attained. • No responsibility is assumed for the methods used by any person or company executing the recommendations provided in this report. • The information provided herein represents an opinion, and in no way is the reporting of a specified finding, conclusion, or value based on the retainer. • This report is proprietary to Arborwell, and may not be reproduced in whole or part without written consent. This report has been prepared exclusively for use of the parties to which it has been submitted. • Should any part of this report be altered, damaged, corrupted, or lost the entire evaluation shall be invalid. ? i ice. -' A�t u,+ 4 i1d OY ! _` 888) 969-8733 199,3 E B.T:.I o _ Roy Red -woo",` Ofy. CA :1410,63 .. _� _, , _ ( < v , `.rix ' 3 , _ �' S2 Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14Tree Assessment 1/14/2O14 Supporting Materials ArboTwell. rmfessiona�lice =rage=ent g Figure 1: an aerial image depicting the area surveyed at the Bubb 14 property inventoried on January 3, 2014 (shaded red), and the area resurveyed on January 14, 2014 (shaded yellow). The removed dead oak, Tree #33, is indicated with ared dot. Table 1: The species and their common names found on-site including individual and removal counts. 1.99� Eas�Oa\uhoreRoad' Redwood City, [A94063 3207 R zomxmRuAu,RxwcnoCoeouvA^CA95742 1039E,M000wAvc.5rcA,SAN K4«ncocO\920O9 & (888) 969-8733 F/31X �(51O)881-52OG Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14Tree Assessment 1/14/2O14 ArboT�eil- lO Removals/Retain/Count Ratio Per Species White Birch Sweetgum �k Tree mster"mmbud Crape Myrtle Coast Redwood Coast Live Oak Chinese Elm o/o� �"� n 2 4 * u m 12 mRetain /"nw. 0Recommended Removals mc"""t m Figure 2: a graph illustrating the percentages of on-site species relative to the whole population (top), and the actual counts for removal/retention recommendations. 2337Amcn/c^m4vp.HAYWmnL),[A94545 O� (888)96Q-8733 l993East 8ayshoeRoad Re�woodO��[A94O63 ' FxX� (51U)801 -62O8 3ZO7F�z sn�mRo��'Hxmcoo[0000v��AS574� vvw^wAnaO[,!,vvcu-CDM lO39E.W',smwAxc.Sri A,SAN yNApcos'C492O69 Samuel Oakley, WE-9474Abor I Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14Tree A00000mant Ar�fessiorW»��eril 1/14/2014 || Figure 3: images of Trees 1 through 5 located at the building entrance (top image), and Trees 6 through 11 located at the parking lot entrance (bottom image). Tree 33, the dead coast live oak (foreground) has been removed (bottom image). 2337AiwonCAN Av�Hx,wxmD,O\94545 Opnos� (Q88)98g-8733 1993East gayshoreRoad, Redwood CiLy' [A94063 FAx(510) 881-5208 5207FnzacexmRox,,Rxmc*oCunoovx CA � v�mn��o0m��uCom 1039E K8/ssmmAve5rcA,SAN K8An�os'CA9Z069 Samuel Oakley, VVE'S474A�Vei Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14Tree Assessment ---��o�w�"��m� 1/14/2014 72 Figure 4: images of Trees 12 through 15 located along the northern perimeter of the property (top image) and Trees 13 through 25 located along the western perimeter of the property (bottom image). 2337Awcn/cxwAx�HA,wmRD,C&94545 {]Fp|�E� (8,138)969-8733l993EaotBayshoreRoad, Redwood City, [A94Od3 FAx�(51O)881-52OQ 3207 ROM), Rxmcno[onuow\CA�5742 ' wxxmvAR80RVvELLI0M 10319 E, M/ssmwAvi-Src4,SAmK8xncos'CA8ZO69 Samuel Oakley, WE -9474A Arbor 11 Apple, Inc. — Bubb 14 Tree Assessment pmk:�Fmionai treemanagemert 1/14/2014 13 Figure 5: images of Trees 26 through 29 located at the courtyard/gathering area (top image) and Trees 30 through 32 located adjacent to the eastern wall of the building (bottom image). 2337Amt,ji(.I,odAvi�, HAYw,,,jIL, CA 94545 OFi-icF (888) 969-8733 ' 1993 East Bay�,horc;, Road, Redwood City, CA 940(.16 '�/�,x (5,10)881-5208 3207 Rn/,,i RALD 1"),DN'J, R/v,wHo 0)mnml;f�, CA97'32 \ANWV'ARF11CA11ZV\/[ "I''("01M 10,31) E, W,sion AvS I I -A, SAN MAR(C5, CA 12069 Samuel Oakley, VVE-Q474Abor I Apple, Inc. —8ubb 14Tree Assessment Arpmfessiona�uVE�� 1/14/2014 14 Figure 6: an image ofTreeo34 through 30located south of the building entrance. 2993 EauL Road' Redwood City' [A94063 3207Rom\RANCHO Coxoow^^CA95742 2039E.K8usmwAvs,SrsA'SAN K0xncos'[A92O89 01 r/c� (088)Q8Q-8733 Fxxi(51O)GR1-52O8 Exhibit 2 - Inventory Matrix Apple, Inc. - Bubb 14 Tree Assessment 10420 Bubb Road, Cupertino, CA Denotes diameter measured at the ton of the root flare due to mulhole stem growth at breast heioht Tag If Common Name Species DBH (Inches) Height (Feet) Spread (Feet) Condition Percentage Recommended Action Notes 1 Sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 22 40 20 30% Remove Surface root damage; Topped 2 White Birch Betula pendula 7,7 30 15 30% Remove Codominant leaders; Topped 3 White Birch Betula pendula 12, 13 30 20 30% Remove Codominant leaders; Topped 4 Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua 20 35 20 30% Remove Surface root damage; Topped S Sweetgum Liquidambar s tyraciflua 4 20 10 40% Remove Stunted growth 6 lelecote Pine Pinus patulo 18 40 30 60% Preserve Deadwood throughout canopy; Overcrowded 7 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 18 35 20 60% Preserve Subdominant with Tree 8 8 Coast Live Oak quercus agrifolia 17 3S 20 60% Preserve Subdominant with Tree 7; Trunk damage; Visible decay 9 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 16 30 20 60% Preserve Leaning canopy 30 Chinese Elm Ulmus porvifolia 9, 10 20 20 50% Remove Codominant at trunk base 11 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 24 60 25 40% Remove Thin foliage density; Water -stressed 12 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 6' 30 10 30% Remove Multi -stemmed; 51hrub-like form 13 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 21 55 2S 30% Remove Thin foliage density; Codominant at base 14 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 11,18 30 25 40% Remove Thin foliage density; Water -stressed 15 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 9 30 15 40% Remove Thin foliage density; Water -stressed 16 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 17 30 30 60% Preserve Unbalanced canopy 17 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 4 30 5 30% Remove Water -stressed; Thin canopy 18 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 6 15 5 40% Preserve Water -stressed; Thin canopy 19 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 6 20 30 40% Preserve Water -stressed; Thin canopy 20 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 7 20 10 70% Preserve Ivy growing into canopy 21 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 7 20 30 70% Preserve Ivy growing into canopy 22 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 7 20 30 70% Preserve Ivy growing into canopy 23 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 6 20 30 70% Preserve Ivy growing into canopy 24 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 7 20 30 70% Preserve Ivy growing into canopy 25 Coast Redwood Sequoia sempervirens 6 20 30 70% Preserve Ivy growing into canopy 26 Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis 12 20 30 30% Remove Topped 27 Bottle Brush Callistemon citrinus 6 15 30 30% Remove Severely leaning 28 Silk Tree Albizio julibrissin 12 20 2S 40% Remove Poor structure 29 Silk Tree Albiziojulibrissin 10 20 20 40% Remove Poor structure 30 Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 4 15 30 50% Remove Growing under building eve; Outgrown existing space 31 Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 4 15 10 50% Remove Growing under building eve; Outgrown existing space 32 Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 5 15 10 50% Remove Growing under building eve; Outgrown existing space 34 Sweetgum Liquidambar styraclfluo 12 35 15 30% Remove Topped 35 White Birch Befula pendulo 14 30 20 30% Remove Competing leaders; Topped 36 Sweetgum Liquidambor styraciflua 14 30 15 30% Remove Topped 37 Sweetgum Liquidamborstyrocii lua 11 30 15 30% Remove Surface root damage; Topped 38 Bottle Brush Callistemon citrinus 6' 30 30 30% Remove Multi -stemmed; Shrub -like form 39 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 17 25 20 60% Preserve Codominant leaders; Included bark tissue; Deferred maintenance