Loading...
Exhibit CC 02-07-2017 Item No. 12 Petition for Reconsideration-u ::::r en (J) l a. (/) ;a CD CD C I""'+-CD CD I""'+- I""'+-0., () CD () I""'+-CD CD I""'+-l ::::r "'O 0 CD "'O 0 :::::; :::::; l () :::::; cc cc "' en 3 ~ 0 CD ' a. :::::; l I""'+-0 CD 0., :::1 en 0 C :::::; l I""'+-0 :::::; 0., -· C/J 0., l I""'+-0 0 "'O CD a. I""'+-o·:::::; C -· () en ::::r Cl. "'O 0 CD :::::; 0., :::::; CD :::::; CD CD en () CD 0., en >< CD >< -< I""'+- , a. en CD en 0 3 0) CD -I""'+-I""'+- l :::::; ~ 0., r+ I""'+--· I""'+-Oo ::::r ~ 0 ::::r CD CD CD 0 0 I""'+-en :::1 C C ::::r en :::::; :::::; CD 0., C () () l :::::; -u O'" 0 en l CD I""'+-3 :::::; 0., a. :::::; r+ :::::; 0., CD I""'+--· ~'< I""'+-0 0., r+ CD I""'+--· < 0 CD l cc () 3 l "'O :::1 3 0 :::::; 0 , :::::; C 0 • • CD a. CD :::::; () l C en a. CD I""'+-() en a. en I""'+-I""'+-C ::::r --+, l 0 0., 0., 0 0., --+, I""'+-l Basis for Reconsideration Section 2.08.096(8) provides ti· e grounds for reconsideratio'n. Petitioner lleges three, I emphasized in bold. I Basis for Reconsideration cont. 1 . An offer of new relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced at any earlier city hearing. 2. An offer of relevant evidence which was improperly excluded at any prior city hearing. City finding: No relevant evidence was improperly excluded from any hearing. Basis fan Reconsideration I cont. 3. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council proceeded without, or in excess of its, jurisdiction. 4. Proof j of facts which J demonstrate that the C~ty Council faile~ to provide a fair hearing. City Finding: The City provided fair hearings. I Basis for Reconsideration 5. Proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council abused its discretion by: a. Not preceding in a manner required by law; and/or b. Rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact; and/or c. Rendering a decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the evidence. City Finding: The City proceeded in a manner required by law, its decision was supported by findings of fact, and the decision was supported by the facts.