Loading...
DRC Reso 141ASA -2004-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 141 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL ARCHITECTRUAL ENHANCEMENTS AND AN ADDITIONAL STAIRWELL FOR AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL/ COMMERCIAL PROJECT (U-2003-03) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA -2004-01 Applicant: Tom Sloan Location: 1375 S. De Anza Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. Abrupt changes in building scale is avoided and a gradual transition related to height and bulk is achieved; and 4. Design harmony between new and existing buildings and structures is protected through the use of consistent or compatible design and color schemes Resolution No. 141 ASA -2004-01 February 18, 2004 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and , That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA -2004-01 set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, February 18, 2004, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Mixed Use Project, 1375 S. De Anza Blvd., Cupertino, CA", dated January 8, 2004 except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. SIGNAGE: No signs are approved as part of this application. A master sign program consistent with the City's Sign Ordinance shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The large non -conforming freestanding sign at the corner of S. De Anza Blvd. and Wildflower Way shall be either be removed or be revised to be consistent with the City's Sign Ordinance. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 - day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. Resolution No. 141 ASA -2004-01 February 18, 2004 Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Miller and Chairperson Wong NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner G: \ Planning\ DRC \ res \ASA -2004-01 res.doc APPROVED: Gilbert Wong, Chairper n Design Review Committee