CC 01-03-92
\.
.
.
þ
/
C::rri OF aJPml'1}Ð, 8JM'F' OF CALIRRŒA
10300 'ltRæ AVENJE, C1JPERl'IK), CA 95014
'IßIF.PfUŒ: (408) 252-4505
MDVl'ES OF 'lHE ADJOORNED CI'lY CDUNCII,lCI'lY MANI\GER N:Rl<SIÐP
HE[l) œ ~ 3, 1992 AT 'lHE CX11RlYARD BY HARRIOIT,
aJPERl'IlÐ, CALIRRŒA
CAIL TO œœR .
'D¡e meeting was called to order at 8:35 a.m,
roIL CAlL
CCA.InC. PL 1;[ ht:
Dean, GoldllBn, Kqpel, Szabo, Mayor Sorensen
staff ~ SEnt:
City Manager Dan Brown
1. Rt:r<>rt Œ1 1991-92 City O::iuncil Goals
'D¡e city manager went: thrcugh item by item the 1991-92 goals update
~""t'UI.l that was c1istrib1ted to the city oounc:i1 in advance of the
meetinq. 'lhe follcwin:¡ additi.a1al ctirec:tion and ç. ........Its were
provided 00 this report.
1. -........H,.,... -......... Elm: 'lhe oamcil requested an estimate of the
)'11-" of hcuxB allocated to each project sham in the matrix
o."'t'UI.t. O::iuncil also reIJJ8Sted a DDre detailed report of the
varlcus scbool sites that are slated to be ~..coC1tod by the city
to in:lude the )'11-" of sites, the order of their inpravement,
the timeline and the linn".. amcunt per site. Direction was also
given to CCI1Sider doinJ a biddin;J Œ1 all the sites at CI'1e time to
get the best pœsJble bid even t:hcugh the "-'Ot'k wculd be (.tIased
CNer two to three years. ChI Jœy ocnoem Œ1 this issue was the
ability to .....il...ul costs so that these scbool sites c:x:minq Œ1
line later wculd not face a fUnd shortage. 'lhe oounc:il's desire
is to establish a _vi__ linl1ar amcunt per site that 1o'CW.d be
authorized. U additiooal i:aptovements above this lI1<',dnlllft amcunt
were to be amsidered, they wculd only CXIIIB after all the scbool
sites had received their share.
1'iI!1 ~ RI~: 'lhe oamcil has tentatively agl..,.,d to not
pm;ue this matter at this time.
~ 1J.œnse 1'Ix: O::iuncil as.~ the staff to verify that a
~ IIœnSiii tax update oculd be a<xx:.apli.shed by a vote of
the city oamcil. If so, it may be ptUdent to begin the update
Œ1 a P.ased bilsis SOCI1Ør rather than later. 'Ihe staff was also
asJœd to look into the possibility of providiJ'g for offsets on
the bJsiness li.œnse tax to ref1..ect the positive bpact fran
retail sales of different kinds of bus.iJ'-.--as.
2.
3.
~lVUllellt: As <li......- Ell in the 1992-93 Goals report later Œ1
in this meetinq, the city oamcil wculd 1iJœ to take another look
at redevel'¥'"'".t frail a political point of view versus a
teduùca1 point of view,
5. &§ In· .tJ.w 2f SiW:II lU !Qr S2U1sæ: '!he city oounc:i1 will
review this as part of the general plan review process in the
œxt few mcnt:hs.
4.
en a related matter, the city oounc:il instructed the city manager
to review the status of iix:J:easing the construction tax and to
report the status durinJ the ~t review process,
" ~.. ..
·
PatJe 2
6.
·
Grand 1'nllevard: 'D¡e owncil agreed that to pmIUO this I«Uld
nq.ù.re a brœd-ba~ ~"1ity <.ó.l lUSUS an1 cU.rec:tien was qiven
in the 1992-93 goals 1oIOrlc pt~aua to IIICJIIe toward that kind of
..atsensus P'"~aua.
7. Narrow.tl» Def;nit';m S2t ~...i1": 'Ihe ocuncl.1 bel~ that
this is an aw<-'"t'tiate matter ard shculd be included in the
revised ZŒÚDJ cxxJe that is ~ dewloped 1:7¡ the """""'''1ity
devel_1t staff. In additien, there _ a fair amcunt of
ooocem with the historic use of the planned devel_d. zaúrq
t:eåII1iq.¡a. 'lhere is a grcwinJ .:xn::ml. that the planned
dsve1___1t za~,),/'ide8 too uu;:h n8ldbility to dsve1cprs and
ocnsideratien be given to a mare precise zaúrq definitia1
for various lan:l uses.
8. General 5AD: 'D¡e city council _ -ad their desire to be able
to revieor the p1arIni.n9 ,."..,."i-i.en's 1oIOrlc product well in advanCe
of a joint meirtin;r With the ,."..,."i....ien. In additia1, the
possibility of scbedulin;J a ~_ _~k "i 1m with the council ard
=1'~_~ ~t~~~ to the joint ræeting with
9. Rorir1øt-, InfcmDi!l~i m: 'D¡e city manager with the S\1¡:v'( t of the
aiUiCil c:xmaitted to cbiIJ;J a mare b......JqJLh lii..,.."....icn of the
significance of sales tax to the City of 0Ip8rtin0 as part of the
0JPertin0 SCene bo~ 0CIII8t'aIJ8.
10. ,..,........~1 : '1be city CDJnCi.1 pœ1.iminarilr C-.DIÚ.tted
to in the league of califŒT".:;..t Cities
counc ~..-,i1di1Y;J wrlœhcp in JUne of this year.
2. 1992-93 ~ AND PRJGIW( DIRæl'Iœ:
·
AttaàIed to ther,p IIIin1tes are the results of the extensive di.....-i.CI'IS
held 1:7¡ the city ownciland city manager en the 1992-93 9"""1... 'lbese
goals Will "be reviewed 1:7¡ the city's department heads to identify
lespaøibilities ard deadlines for ~lishi:aen'v.
3. RE:VIEH AND RE.VL'"E Cl'lY CXXJNCJL 1IR6:
'D¡e city cn1l1Cil n:mœ were reviewed h1t with an élr.jlee.uent to keep
them intact.
'lbere was saœ additiooal di"",'1-icn en correspcn:ienoe frail individual
oounci1........n..TS to ocnstituents. It was generally agreed that
iniividual counc; 1.._.~ era may ..........~.d with ocnstituents ard such
........o.cSpOI'denoe shculd be cxpied to the other oounci1-.~ era ard city
managa. In additia1, ..........~idenœ to ocnstituents shoold indicate
whether the issue at hard is a view held ŒÙY 1:7¡ the city
counci1~ writin;J the letter or if it. .is a shared vieor 1:7¡ others
on the city council.
·_....~ _'._,.....~".';"..."';':"'" ~~;"':'~r....
.
Page 3
4 , REVIBf 'DIE FœIAT AND IWŒ R:R C1'lY JWW;ER EVAIIJld'Iaf:
Mayar SuL.....een offend an øvaJ.uat.icn faDat that "",.111 be used for the
city ~ evaluaticn. '1ba __cd ......._IMUS ,.. that it _ a gocx1
fomat to use. '!be city IIIIIIIIII)IIr also CIIfA....ed a survey of
organizat.ic:lllll effect.i,--- tbat ..".",lIt be a IIa1881t to the fœ:m
¡m::NidIId by the -z-. It,..~ tbãt the sw:vay of
0rgan1zaticnal --11-xa ( CJI,lIt be ......, DDt cnly by the ci~
CD.II1Cn.. J...... but by city ~ and a ~11'"9 of t&e _-.
pJblic.
'n1e city ccunci1 and city IIIIIIIIII)IIr _-'1 that the faI::mal evaluatia1
sessiœ will be belct en FeiD:uuy 15, 1992 at 9 a.a. in ocnftoL......... roaa
A at 0Jpertin0 City Ball.
AD]
Þ City
1992-93 ec.Js
Action
~
.
Deadline
Primary
.
GOAL
A. FINANCE/ECONOMIC
1. City Manager review w /
Chamber potential Boon.
Dev. Officer
-report to coun& pros/cons/c:œts
2. New Rev, sources
-review as part of budget process
-åty manager do a report of budget
process
3. 5- Year Forecast
-tie closer to 1 year budget
--show options
a. Basic: needs worst case to run
business
b. Normal growth - projections
on target
c:. Luxury
-Blaine does report
.,-check bid process re 2-stage bids
<_I?)
199243 GoØ
Action
sø
.
Deadline
Primary
.
GOAL
B. GENERAL PLAN
1. Finish it - set firm deadline
2. Protect hillsid~
3. Finished product should be clear
and meaningful
4. Revisit Goals Committee Report
5. Adopt Affordable Housing mitiga-
tion policy
6. Subcommittee (2 counå1 and staff) -
to develop strategy for redevelopment
w /Bus. Comm. and County
7. Begin the interactive process to develop
the consensus points of Grand Blvd.
Committee
.
Action
~
Deadline
1992-93 Goals
Primary
.
.
GOAL
C. ISSUES WJTH ADJACENT crrœs
1. Evaluate annex/deannex of San Jose
area to Cupertino (Rainbow/Bollinger/
Blaney)
2. Evaluate rename Hwy. 9 to De Anza
Blvd. (S'vale, San Jose, Cup.)
D. REGIONAL ISSUES
1. Measure A Extension
--Active monitoring/involvement
-Council position at appropriate time
2. Regional Govt.
-Adopt council position on regional
consolidation and rev. sharing (include
property tax)
-Stay closely tied into process
--Insure shared position(s)
.
1992-93 Goù
Action
Strø
.
Deadline
.
GOAL
E. TRAFFIC
1. Stevens Creek Blvd.
-Proceed w/permissive left
--Evaluate keeping interconnect on
longer
-Followup report to coundl on status
of traffic committee
-Consider hiring consultant to do an
overall analysis of traffic flow improve-
ments. (include eliminate barriers)
F. CULTURAL DIVERSrrY
1. Ke-energize liaison committee (residents)
of various cultures (mayor and åty manager)
-Find ways to promote greater community
partiåpation
.
\".¡o.;>"
.
,
19P2-93 Goals
Action
-.
.
n.....n111C
.
GOAL
G. IMPROVE OPERATIONS
--Better communicate w/Planning
Commission (and ASAC)
-minute orders
-regu1ar study sessions
--Provide structured orientation for
new commissioners
.- Transmit priority for customer service
and "user friendly" environment
--Volunteer program
-pursue as part of budget
H. MISCELLANEOUS
1. Sr. Center expansion
-consider w l5-yr. CIP
2. Ordinances (update or new)
--cigarette maclúne restriction
-blight in side/front yards (Joe A-
Gilroy)
--Roofs-hillside
-Sign ord.
. -private tennis lessons preempt public
. use
. .
.
Action
~
Deadline
1992-93 GoùI
Primary
I GOAL
I 3. Evaluate computer communication
i w / cow\cil at homes
I
,
4. Review possible move council meetings
to 1\1esday
. .
/ ,
. e
,