CC 08-19-91
. .
. .
.
CITY œ aJPBRTnO, 91MB œ CALDœHIA
10300 '!uuœ; AVIIMB, ~.uÐ, C'A 95014
'J1IUSIIDIB: (408) 252-4505
MIl«1ŒS œ '11IB PI!mLAR ~.UG or 'DIB Cl'l'f ~
H!U) CIl ~.I.' 19, 1991, ITQ1t"IL Ͽ -I Cl'l'f DIl.,
10300 '!I.IUQS AVENC!, ~.üÐ, CALDtRIIA
œ-818
pl'mr.R œ AIUX;IANœ
'!he meeting _ called to .....dtr.. by ~ lfcppel. at 6:45
p.m.
RCLL CAlL
(bmc. PL s_IL:
Golåœn, SOrensen, Rogats, ~ lfcppel.
'"'
ca.n:. AŒ_IL:
~aM
Staff Pk. B IL: \
city Manager Brcwn
City Clerk Camelius
Direc:tor of Public H:Jrkø Vi.slll:wiå1
Direc:tor of I'hnnmity DeYRl, 'I. .L QMm
Director of pi.-- SDyder
PubliC' Tn'... ..~Lia1 Offi""'t' Kœy
8011:18;"'9 am Serviœø Qxmiiœtar Norling
lbJ8;ng ~..1;at Gil
City Attamey }ri 1 ;,m
POS'ŒCIØI!N.l'S
By ,.".,-.mlS, Item No.2.. .........i....-, to tbe III! !~i'9 of
Sept_.i«: 16. '!be Dir~ of n-mi:ty nø.-1''I...-.L..
directed to notify Mr. Proøøer.
ŒRI!HIaAL MIb.'~ - ~
:rnt:rcxmct:.i. of Bci) ~ 1 ~, ~..in aDd 1III8t:8idIt 9t'-~....
... ..........-- and Rubeo Diaz, Assistant Sberiff.
City Manager
Sberiff Diaz.
~ _.a_IL.
8roIoIn ÏúL..·.1."'e"I ~..i n ~ 1...... aDd A88i.øtaat
He also poiDt:ed cut that Lt. M. 1U:Ier..
-1-
e
MDI7mS œ 'BIB AIDJS'l' 19, 1991, RIGJIAR C1'l'!' CXDI:IL
l'ZIri.l.'J.1Ð (œ-818)
aw:. CXlIDlIC'ATICIIB
Consent
:alendar
BaIbara Plungy, 20720 Gatden MImor Court, ~"¥L B .Ling the
Gardenview l'à..~_ Ji ..- ~a Assoc:iatia1, 1& Bl>;:Led
rn""..i 1 with 4 petitiœ and letter to CXX1Sider road hmpe
en Glm:llmside lane.
'.DIe Director of Public Wades will look into the JIIItter am
"<yA L back.
<XI&Nl' ClWIIaR
QJunc. Rcga.... rem::MId It:.eIœ 39 am 40. It _ IŒM!!d by
QJunc. ~'" ~.Ja1 by QJunc. SOreIuIen and puøed
unm1ÎDDWIly (4-0) to aåJpt the 0:I1sent CaleDdar as
}& s_~Led.
1. Review of
1 i ..-.- for
Bculevard.
request far Alooholic ~CI.""" OJntrol
IAJCky Stores '155, 10425 South DeAnz4
.
2. A¡poval of L..! S to be pl..-1 along ellSterly edga of
project, Çliœtia1 11-0-90, &.b..alo DtM:'1. ,,··-.L
n "I"'l'IY, 1oaIt:ed at the IICUt:heast qu...:h.aúL of 1'IIaa...,....
1bù.evan1 and 1-280. (Previously cx:ntinued to
Sept _.1 -ea: 16, 1991.)
3. !'II........... and MAh. for Tw.......ity for ~.-J"'" f'iled en
........11' of stewD Hi.......l !fI'o..bza, plaintiff. Rsœive.
4. Request for wiver of busi...... li'-'~ fees: (a)
united r...n...... Des ,..b !:hoi-t:y¡ (b) 1I:Jrld FriM1lW1ip
!:hoi""::y; (c) 1II!Ist valley ......"....cy ServiϿ Vbl"*~
Fire I>" 6&.1 .1 .
5. ltJDtbly n. JUn/r'8 ~L aD1 tllvigPot ~, July,
1991.
6. ltJDtbly Activity ~L, July, 1991.
7. 1\ß'1 iœt.iœ 8 JISIIC-91 - Phil aD1 Nancy Pa1mintere -
Request for reviøf and G;¥L....ral of architectural '-i'7'
for a ..ingJ_f'''''; ly bcIIIe 1ccsted CI'1 Stauffer lane in
the Seven Spr:iDgs ~1,,, ··-aL. R$o· _...~_iAi far
.wmvaJ..
.
-2-
MDÐmS CP 'mE MJ}]ST 19, 1991, RI!GJ1AR Cl'l"f CDH:IL
........i".uG (CX:-818)
8. !:III............ and O::IIplaint, Perice D. Sibley, It minar, by
and thIauIj1 her QJantian Ad Litem, Hiram A. Sibley.
Receive.
9. Acœptanœ of d:natia1 of pi III'V'I to the ()1inlan
rn-1I\i.ty Center fraa Mel Retzer.
10. .II1md of u..uL..aCt to IIxteI-·.......,L PubH..~ for
printing of recreatim schedule.
11. Request far Parks aD1 Recreat.i.œ oo-spcnsarsbip fmm
Iaø !b:h.c& '90.
12. Deø~ of voting delegate for T--::r- of Cal!.fomia
Cities Annual amfeœnœ.
13. Reøolutia1 lb. 8468: "A Reøolutia1 of the City n..1IV"Il
of the City of QJpertino Acœpt.ing Orlt-t'!l..im Deed and
Autharizatia1 for tL;It...'>JL.....md Water RiIIts fmm Wing C.
1-"'9 and Cindy K. Leo1lYJ, RI,Rhomti and Wife, as JOint
TenImt8¡ Scenic Circle."
14. ~ of JIIII'Ii";~l iDprcNaœnts:
a) Tract lb. 8249, Gaxdeoside LIme ...wHvisiœ
(T...........TIt ~""i""L L}')
b) SteveIIs creek/OJpertino JI~-_, tIus tumcut at
SteV'ens CL h..lRMvIl~ ('nIrget)
15. ReøolnH,..., lb. 8469: "A Reøolutia1 of the City n..1IV"I1
of the City of O:prtino ~ Final Plan for the
Dy._.........L of Frcotage at 10710 South n.a_
Bon}-nmi, DBY8lqIer, 'nIoo Bell Cl....pu..ól ;...--¡
ADt'Mri...ing the City ~--- to SÏ91 the Final Plan¡
and Autharizing the BIec:I1tiœ of JIo"..-·-.t in
n ..._.....i,.... lJba&.allith.·
16. Reøolnt-;,..., lb. 8470: "A ReøolnH,..., of the City n..1IV"Il
of the City of O:prtino 1-. -vi ;"9 Qed. of ----.1
for ~ Pl.n:pcns fmm 01rist:ina B. Ia """;00 and
MIItt:bBw P. Ia )h1; 00, Trustees of the Ia )h1;1'ft
~'e Trust n.t-~ Mtu...h 28, 1989, a:msistiDg of
J\wL...I-tely 0.0433 Acœø, IDeated œ the Nort:hea8t
(I)....w of n.a".,..IO Boulewrd and 801 Hnc;por RoIId."
17. Reøolutia1 lb. 8471: "A Reøolutia1 of the City n..1IV"'Il
of the City of 0Jpertin0 ~;ng QaùL of RA-·_.L
for Public utilities fmm 0Iristina B. Ia 1I:ni00 and
Matthew P. Ia H:x1i00, Trustees of the Ia H:x1ico
ReIIcœble Trust Dated Mard1 28, 1989, IDceted œ the
Northeast Cbmer of De1tDza Boulevard and 80llingBr
RoIId. "
-3-
I
,:
MDÐmS œ '!HE AIGJST 19, 1991, RI!GJIAR CITY aDCIL
.......:¡,..ur; (CC-818)
18. Reøo1uticn No. 8472: "A Reøo1uticn of the City n-."""¡l
of the City of CUpertino AœI!pt:ing Grant of --·-.L
far ~ Puqx:øes £ran John P. n-i.... and Peggy A.
Dozier, O>-'l'nIstees of the JoIm P. rwi~ and Peggy A.
~illO[' Inter vives 'l'J:ust Dated JaIJImy 10, 1984, and
JæIes H. Dozier and virginia P. tmier, O>-Trusteeø of
the JæIes H. Dozier aD1 virginia P. n-i.... Inter Vives
'l'J:ust ~~.:L Dated March 30, 1984, as '.DIeir
Respective Interest May ~r, Ccœisting of
A¡paxiJœtely 0.0287 Acres, IDeated CI'1 the Alcazar
RIOIId. .
19. Reso1uticn No. 8473: "A Reso1uticn of the City council
of the City of CUpertino AœI!pt:ing Grant of 11',,"_._ ,L
for Ten-Foot wiele water Line 1bo......_.L £ran the a.......4
Catholic Bishcp of Sðn Jose and Rancho Sðn Antaúo
Retiraœnt Iblsing 0Jrp0raticn, IDeated Cristo Rsy
Drive at St. Joø.p¡'ø -;"""Y."
20. Resoluticn No. 8474: "A Resoluticn of the City n-."""¡ 1
of the City of CUpertino AœI!pt:ing Grant of --.- ,L
for 'lhirty-Foot wiele water Line 1bo......,.....L £rem the lL.au
Catholic Bishcp of Sðn Jose and Rancho Sðn Antaúo
Retinm!nt Iblsing 0Jrp0raticn, IDeated Cristo Rsy
Drive at St. .Joø"'P" ø -;"""Y."
21. ~;mt"JR of city projects:
JollYJlllUl Park Dat-.uvaac:a.:L, Project 91-9101 (0)11; om-
Ccœtructiœ)
22. Reso1uticn !i). 8475: "A Reso1uticn of the City (b1llV"'l1
of the City of CUpertino A¡:ipt'OVing IDt Line Mjust.-.L
BetI" en 'l\ic Parœl.ø of Lm:i Withcut a Parœl MIIp in
Aa:DrdImœ with Sect:ia1 66412(d) of :,}riiñøicn Mi!Ip Act
as ..._-~ .'Tllnluny 1, 1984, Nl!l8ley ~~Li' ami ra. ..---
~'-'t"'I'-L)'; SoutboIeøt a.......... of Pb1..-t AWIJUe and 'l\:mi
Cburt. "
23. Reøoluticn No. 8476: "A Resoluticn of the City (b,."..i 1
of the City of 0Jpertin0 ~ing o.dt,.l,.im Deed and
Authorizatia1 for tA.:b."......md water RiqJtø £rem Palo
Vista Im..::tit-:uL, Inc., a n.1ii'lYrnia~, 10570
santa !}V'!;,. RDIId."
24. Reso1uticn No. 8477: "A Resolution of the City n-.1I'V";1
of the City of 0Jpertin0 .an-v;ng Grant of 1I'...a-·_,L
far Roac:\!oIay Plu.l"=øes £ran Palo vista :rm..:...L..ICIIL, Inc.,
a California corporat.i.Œ1, Ccœisting of J\w¡......n....œly
.006 Acres, IDeated at santa T",.;~ RIOIId."
-4-
MIlÐŒS œ '!HE NDBr 19, 1991, RI!GJIAR CITY CDH:IL
..........ue (Œ-818)
25. ReøolnHI'Wl Nt.. 8478: -A Resolution of the City no-.1IV"'Il
of the City of CJpertim Approving Qmtract ~
order No. 1 far Annual OIIerlay, Project 91-104.-
26. Resoluticn No. 8479: -A Resoluticn of the city no-.1IV"'Il
of the City of CJpertim Approving Parœl MIIp and
~UYaIIIOOìI_ Plans; Autbatizing Executiœ of Ckl-Site
~u.--'Î.t J\yL~lL; CJpertim Gat:øey Pa...t.-..D
(Çle a:mput:er Project) 10700 North n.a..",...
Boulevard) . -
27. Resoluti.on No. 8480: -A Resolution of ths City no-.1IV"'Il
of the City of CJpertim ApprOVing Parœl MIIp and
IDprovement Plans; Autbatizing Executiœ of Off-Site
DIprO\IOIIeIlt J\yL~'~'1. with!U....-..t.o DIMIo],,'i·,....\L n."..."}'
'910 (JIßIle 0:IIp1ter Project) 10700 North ~""'...
BciI.tleYBrd. -
28. Resoluticn No. 8481: -A Resolution of the City no-.1IV"'Il
of the City of 0Jpert:in0 Approving Executiœ of 'SU:eet
aD1 Bridge ~uy.....-1. J\yL~.-.L' with !U....alo Int:.erest
II, a Ca1.ifomi.a General Partnership; North De Anza
Boulevard and Roote 280.-
29. P-l-t for GK""u.tal for deí...,..- .L of ÍJIpI:'OII'8III fees
on ~ project, 81"""'Y 1M!IJue.
30. RscJ-t to .."¥L...."..- $100,000 fraa B:lu8ing for
~""""'l. Pecple (HIP) project aoccunt: to the
Affu... W\le Hcus;ng PImd ~.
(a) Resoluticn No. 8467: -A Resoluticn of the City
0::/1""'; 1 of the City of Q]pertino ReecindiDg
Resoluticn No. 8397 aD1 Approving the
~....".._....ing of $100,000 fraa tba B:lu8iüg far
T'-~·'!.-.L People (HIP) Project JIccoUnt to the
Afiia.. J..h le B:lu8ing PImd ~. -
31. Reøol1.H,.., No. 8483: -A Resoluticn of the City no-.1IV"'Il
of the City of CJpertim )601dng Det:eIDdnatiauI and
J\¡:p:tJVing the ~.~r..ia1 of TeIrit.œ:y Desi.9Jated
'~.lal Avenue 91-1', JIK....... i-tely .16 Acre I.oœted
on the East Side of ~.lal Avenue B8tueen Olive
Avenue and Alcazar Avenue; Frat.arœngeli (APN
357-19-0(4).-
32. Resoluticn No. 8484: -A Resoluticn of the City no-.""';l
of the City of 0Jpert.in0 Allowing Certain C1Ah.... aÐd
Dba.mlds Pay8ble in the ADaInts and FlaIl the FUnds as
Hereinafter Described far Gt:uo:u.al and Misoellanecus
Expenditures far the Period Erv:ling June 26, 1991.-
-5-
MINí11ZS CP 'mE AlGJST 19, 1991, RIG1IAR crrr <DH:IL
...--r.uG (0::-818)
33. Res)1utia1 No. 8485: "A Res)1utia1 of the city 0Juncll
of the city of CUpertino Al1awing Certain l"1.i.... and
I)-.-..rn. Payable in the ADDunts and FraIl the l"Imðs as
HereiMft:er Described for Genc..al and Misœl1~
~lditures far the Period Ending JUne 30, 1991.-
34. Reøolutial No. 8486: "A Reøolutial of the city n,.,."..¡ 1
of the City of CUpertino Allowing Certain l"1.i.... and
I)-.~..IA Payable in the ADDunts and FraIl the I'Imd8 as
Hereinafter Described for Gen&al and Misœ11~
ll"l-·Htures far the Period Ending July 17, 1991.-
35. Reøolutial No. 8487: "A Reøolutial of the City 0Juncll
of the City of CUpertino Allowing Certain ('1.i.... and
~ Payable in the ADDunts and FraIl the I'Imd8 as
Hereinafter Described for GerIeral and ~llanecwl
1l-1-·iitures for the Period Ending ~ 9, 1991.-
36. Reøolutial No. 8488: -A Reøolutial of the City o-.1N"i1
of the City of CUpertino Allowing Certain ('l.i.... and
1).....-."iA Payable in the ADDunts and FraIl the I'Imd8 as
HereiMft:er Described for Salaries and WI!gBs for the
Payroll Period Ending July 16, 1991.-
37. Reøolutial No. 8489: -A Reøolutial of the City n,."".i1
of the City of CUpertino Allowing Certain l"1.i.... and
1)-.-. .i<I Payable in the J\JII:JuntIJ and FraIl the I'Imd8 as
Hereinafter Described far Salaries and WI!Ige8 for the
Payroll Pericd Ending July 30, 1991.-
38. Acceptanœ of resit;Jlatiœ of Dlllrlene 'D&....... £:mil PubHc
Safety Chnni a'ili.cn aD1 roo- .....~ .iAti.cn reg!Œding
rec::roiI..u::aJL.
39. p...... .ed £:mil the '"""-at Calendar.
40. L..../tId £:mil the '"""~ Calendar.
41..AppEtMù of minutes of the July 29, 1991, adjoumed
I"'?'1..... meeting of the City n,."".; 1.
I'ß!HJ RI!IDIBD P1UI <XHII!Nl' CAIBtmIUt
39. AßJroval of minutes of the July 1, 1991, I'""9',1....
meeting of the City n,.m,.i 1 .
0:Junc. Rogers requested that CI'1 pIIgB 5, it ~Hy that her
cbjectia1s were to hlrIt;rt increases in <Dmty
Camlmicatiœs.
-6-
MnUŒS œ '!HE JWGI:JS'1' 19, 1991, RIGJIAR CITt CXDCIL
..........&.rC (a:-818)
It .. JJDYed by n"",.... Rogar&, ...........Jt.d by Q:Junc:. SoIe&\8eI1
and r-"sed UM11.ÍJIrJUSly (4-0) to ClJ:¥Luv'8 the minutes as
tlmended.
40. Approval of minutes of the JUly 15, 1991, I""9',b,.
meeting of the City rQI",...; 1 .
Counc. Rogars stated that en page 15, her intent _ to
state that in aJUrt, DBtters pertaining to rooHg;<W\ TQ~1d
have a great deal of waiIJt and prcœbly carry any caøe
involved. Also, en page 22, she stated that -train- ..lv1oo)t'
be -trail-.
It _ JJDYed by Q:Junc:. ~a, s.........Jt.d by ~UK". Sorensen
and ["'''sed UM11.ÍJIrJUS1y (4-0) to ClJ:¥Luv'8 the minutes as
o!!IIIleIlded.
PUBLIC HI!'ARIlGI
42. CcD8ideratica of m.mg;'1I1 atreet DI!IIIIB, -Parkside LIme-
to "Ib.~ LIme-.
(a) Reso1uticn No. 8490: -A Reso1uticn of the City
C'QI"""'; 1 of the City of 0Jpert.ÏID ordering a SL....et
Nsæ 01ðnge Within the City of 0Jpertjn0 Pur8uIII1t
to Sectiœ 5026 of the SL..~ and R'9-YB axte,
State of no1if'nruia¡ nvm.;p. 'Parkside LIme' to
'ø....~ LIme' . -
Pbllawing review of the staff ~"¥",,L, the meeting..
q- -1 to the PJblic.
Harry ~, 10224 South R1'"""'f AvemJ8, said that his
parents own the ~"i"""Li puallel to Parkside LIme. Be
stated that if the City plans to ~ that ..L..eeL DIllIe,
they .........;...... the DIllIe of Gbeno.
'l!Iere -'''9 no other pnblic ÌJIplt, the Mayor ..1. BIleS the
publ i c bearing.
It _ IIDV'ed by n"",.... Sorensen, ~ ..~ by (bmc-. GoJ"-'
and p-sed (3-1) with C'QI1IK'. a...",..... dissenting, to lœep the
DIllIe of Parkside LaDe.
43. Q:;¡-.aideratica of --..Ii'1l1 user fees.
(a) Resoluticn No. 8465: -A Resoluticn of the City
Ccuncil of the City of CUpertino Resc:ind.ing
Resolutian No. 7454 aD1 Establishing user Fees.-
-7-
Street Name
Change' Parks ide
Ln. to Murdock Lr
User fees
MDI71BS CP 'DIB AIJGVST 19, 1991, RI!GJLAR crrr aucIL
...........uG (œ-818)
(b) RII!Iøolutiœ No. 8466: -A Resolutiœ of the City
n."mM 1 of the city of 0Ipertin0 .an-vti"'1 the
BDvircnœnt:a1 AsB!S~lL 1».. o()Aollrre as Orig:ll1Ally
JItfrý-' CI'1 MIIrå1 27, 1973 aD1 Au.:..dt.d CI'1 MIIrå1 4,
1974, January 17, 1977, May 1, 1978, July 7, 1980,
anc1 MIIrå1 13, 1984.-
Di.rec:t:.œ: of pi.......... Snyder reviewed his ~q,A.AL L to n."mM 1
anc1 stated that he .....'ld be back in 60 days with planninl¡
fee po.. _...-..Jat.ia1s.
'1here "";"'1 DO cme t"- s--::L who wished to ca1:h.c..s n."mMl,
the MIIyor <:,1œad the public hearing.
n.",."... Gol- stated that when the new caterpry for use of
the 01,;"1..,, Chnn"1i.ty Center _ a¡:proved, he felt it _
n."mMl'8 intent that busiœss interests Bhou1d pay Ii
hitþ!r: fee, such as $125 instead of $100.
Mr. Snyder stated he will reviev that aD1 a:me back to
():)O,."..; 1 wbeo be bringB the pll111n;ng fees.
n.",."... GoJ- then IIDIIed that the I!:rJvira'Denta Røview
n-ittee . "'I".itico be .....- - "- , anc1 include a nca-voting
cit-;- ,,_...... /IR)OÏDted by the Clair. '.DIe ciH-.¡
. ~ .....·111 serve for a period of cme year rnnning
A'1I)CII u<:aíL with the e1.ect.im year (~ to NoI.....t.....).
'bt 1"=-' .....·1d receive all ~"'I DOtifiœt.ials, and
IIIIIterial anc1 ....·ld atterId œ a r-;p.l_ basis. n.",."...
Gol"-n felt this ....,11'1 qB1 the 1&...-:'eBB anc1 All.... for
tJrnootWr citizen part.i.cipaticn.
'DIe DDt.iœ W8 ae-. --1A.:J by n..wv-. SoreI1sen.
City Att:amey p:i li.." st'-«I that Ii DDt.iœ _ DOt
~ ty. By. n -"'US, (bmci 1 ...'n1tt direct staff to
a:me beck with a 1&""" seri arñi~.
I1bllawiDg di ....""eien regIIJ:'ding the need far this and
"'H&.....I....-B of this, n.",."... Gol""'" stated the n.",."...¡ 1
~ints ....-i_i.... aD1 voting advisory.bœrd ..~'~«9. '.DIe
po:...-. he is 81.....,poLing for ERe wcu1d not be a voting
II~,. ......, bIt 1111 obsetver.
City MIInIIger, Brcwn aslœd if n.,,1DC. Golåœn were looking for
any part.Ï.a1lar QI'" 1 ; 1'i cat.iœs ar representat.ial. Perhaps,
it ....'ld be adequate just to send .....~ agendas, as
anyooe am speak CI'1 eny itan.
-8-
MDI1ŒS œ 'DIB JWGI:JST 19, 1991, RI!GJIAR crrr a:xH::IL
...........uG (CI:-818)
f"<:¡I~. Q)lttnom ..,,£eed that at I!'.RC anycœ is An-JId to
'P"'1r and participste¡ hI:JIIIever, be felt that if & .I...... "" is
there in DDr8 of lID of¥;,.;"1 ~ty, that ~...... .....,JrI
understand the ~...œsS DDr8.
city ~ Brown stated that the role of I!'.RC is vety
limited and it is not a policy........¡dng body. He stated be
is not in fawr of a citizen àJeerver.
'!he previous DDtia1 l"'ased 3-1 with MIIyor lfqpl
dissenting. Staff will 1&qaLe aD1 bring back to n-.1I1I"j) a
~~ øed œ:dinm1ce.
It _ IIDIIed by counc. Sorenaen, ..... ...iø;j by n-.1I1l", RogI!Q:&
and pe'ased \J.I'1An;''''~ly (4-0) to aàJpt Resolut.ia1 No. 8465.
It _ IIDIIed by n-.,.".. Sorensen, ....... .iø;j by n-.,."., ØuyaL.
aD1l"'ased \J.I'1An;""~JSly (4-0) to aà::pt Resolut.ia1 No. 8466.
44. J\{p""1 of p1Am1;ng /'hnn;-iœ .-.;,,1, J\ppliœtia1
4-0-91, which .....,1rI allaw an existing awn:1--..a utility
line to røœin in service to an existing reei.......,..
which is part of a previously approved bo-lot
s>JbdiviB;lT. '.DIe 1&,¥,,-ly is 10œted at 22050 ~
RDIId (Jhuo1rl E. HImsen, œc: As"'O"';Ates, Inc.,
~l1Ant) .
Dh'ec:tor of ()"nInm;ty Dewl'\··~.L QMIn reviewed P1Anning
Chnni _;...... acti.c:n with n-.,.".; 1 .
~1(! E. -........, 8pp""l1Ant, reviewed his 1&' v»al that DBII
CXIISttuctia1 be undergr:o.uxied, bIt existing r--in abcJve
ground. '1his is a hi 11 Aide devool'\..~.L with 2-1/2 + acre
~. He At. Jed 81 ;..... of the area and ---·,.lee of
wbBœ be 1&''I,oI<SBS ~J'\··-.L be All~d to lœep utilities
above ground. He stated that vials to Pì.~L Older axe
not atBtruct:ed by );..- and that the aesthetic quality and
natum1 beImty axe not affected. tI1at staff is ~,~;ng
far the w..:]my¡.....ming will IXISt '"1-¥L' ,. i_te1y $45,000. He
~,~ Bed that ~,.".; 1 require undergrounding far DBII
dev001'\··-.L ar 25' .-··œl, bIt that they All(;IW the
CI\'!rl1-_..a in existing semi-rural areIUI until there is a
......."9'" to 1/2 acre or less lots.
Hr. ec-n pointed out that this area will be OOilt out to
its III!IXÏJIun as per the cw....::..L General Plan when the
~,~.:sed secood house is OOilt.
-9-
Res, 8465 adoptee
Res. 8466 adoptee
Appeal, App. No.
4-U-91
MDUŒS œ 'mE AIGJST 19, 1991, RIGJLAR crrr CXDCIL
........-.uC (CC-818)
GeneIrieve Zi"'9ler, 22085 ~Y"t AoIId, stated she did not
r-1 i_that uncIm:groundiDg bad been in effect far 20
years. She said that she sees no problem with (J\ftoo.1 --...
lines, as the LI: ! BS are DBture and the lines are not
exposed.
'ltm NBineger, ~Y"t CanycD, ~....sed agt:o::o::IIICItL with Mr.
Hansen. He felt that rlig;¡:h1CJ will dt::..L.."1' the land and not
benefit the canp1. He urged Q:Iuncil to grant the ~l.
Dick Oùldress, 22025 JhoT-t RcIId, said that he bad been
inv;:)lved with devel<:p;ng the canp1 aD1 did not WIlDt IIIIIIIl1
lots there. He urged 0Juncl1 to keep density low and
retain the rural and semi-rural .,.1 n. ~. He stated the
belief that PG&B has a ruling of mini"..n three acre lots
for over---'" of utilities. He stated that he 1&..tábly bad
the best view of Mr. Hansen's poles and they did not bother
tùm. He preCCL~...J QJuncil to keep the area low density as
is.
Jjm Wallœr, RPT"Y"t CanycD AoIId, said his deck overlooks
the Hansen i'L"'l'""-L)'. 'lheee are minor aD1 insi9úfiamt
poles that are hardly ~;--"'1e. Residents of the area
enjoy living the way they are. He .....,1ti hate to see œavy
equipœnt <DIII!I in to UI.:It....".....m. He urged ,..",,.,,.i 1 to
leave thingB the way they are.
Jotm Garlick, ~Y"t CanycD AoIId, said it is unfair to
require u..:It....".....1I'Viing. Peqùe do not really see these
poets. He stated that if """vr!1 wnted to get rid of any
of the poets, they ..}roa,1rI get rid of the big, tall œeø
that are not included as pert of this. .
As there 10Ieœ no other I,_.J &6 of the p.lblic wishing to
~1c, the Mayor ,.l-sed the p.lblic hearing.
It _ DIM!d by ,..",,.,,.. Ib~.. and ~a.It:..l by Cbmc.
Sorensen to ."..CII1l. the ""fI-1.
Mr. Hansen reiterated that he was tTmIIIitted to
undergrounding the new devel''i,,'''''.L.
Counc. Go]tftom stated a preference that the uncIm:groundiDg
<DIII!I £ran the roBd.
'!he DDt.ion to ."....uL the 1I['{"'""1 was ~ unaniJlDusly.
-10-
MDUŒS œ 'ltŒ AOOUST 19, 1991, RI!GJIAR CITY <DH:IL
...........uG (a:-818)
45. Public hearing to CDlSider ClUCllaiðcaìL of 0Iapter 16.16
of the CUpertino Kmicipù. QxIa to adept. the 1990
CaliforniA Electrical 0Jde, par~~ 5, restrictiDg
adcptia1 of local amesalucaìL eN qIl for }""'" 1 c:liJIBtic,
geological or t.'IÞ:fL~cal cxniitiœs.
(a) ardinance No. 1567: "An ordinance of the City
0:Iuncil of the City of CUpertino Amending 0Iapter
16.16 of the CUpertino ItJrùrjp"'1 Q)de to Adept the
1990 Fditim of the California Electrical COde."
It was IIDIIed by counc. ~'" ~.dt.d by counc. 90reIISen
am passed UMIÚJID1Sly to reIId ordinance No. 1567 by title
c:rùy and the city Clerk's reeding to amrtitute the first
reøding tt.:Leof.
46. CCIIsi.deratia1 of çlicatiœs 1~A-91 and 2-U-91-
!b1ta Vista Centerf1'enY Brown - GeI.....al Plan Aìu.a~L
to allc:Jw residential use ~is CI'1 APN 326-19-117 in
lieu of meeting the NeiqIborhccd a..w.eo::cial use
objective far the !b1ta Vista (\ ...,...., cial district
stated in the "FUncticI1 " st:ateIDeDt for the Ib1ta vista
~;..1 Planning AreII in the I.aB1 Use In~,~.L. Use
Pemit to dBlDlish an existing retail oenter and
deI/eJ.q) 28 1IEIIIi.-det:adJed townhcme units en 2.77 grœs
acres, and retain the m;,..,.t use 8,400 sq. ft.
, . ...._. ci.al/offiœ st:cucture with 10 ar DDre SEIù.or
Citizen aperaœnts abave CI'1 the r--;nhq.84 ac:œ.
Envircnœnta1 Dete1:mination: 'lbe p111m1;ng n-ni_i.a1
r..... ...._.iR the granting of a Negative Dec1aratiœ. '.DIe
i""~ Lj is located CI'1 the north side of St:eIII!!n8 Creek
Bculevm:d, 300 ft. west of MIInn Drive (Old Ib1ta Vista
HardwIIre site). P.Þo ....,~.dt.d far -.;..1.
Reøolutiœ No. 8491: "A Reøolutiœ of the City
(b~l of the City of ~ ~.
çlialt:ún 1-GPA-91 -!b1ta Vista Center."
ü.í.:œCtor of C"rmIIImity DeIIelqment CDi8n reviewed historical
inf.....oALicn and stated his ""1ief that the i""'oyCBBd
a¡:plicatiœ WBS not in exmcmœnœ with the Gmc..a.l PlIIn.
He stated that he did not feel, . ....-. o.;Íal activity WBS
viable without a "super-sized' store. 'lbe deIIeloper is
lcoking at a c:Mnge £ran u..oluê/:cial to residential
deI/I01. 'I..,~.L. If council wished, they could set direc:ti.a1
and return the matter to the planning O:IIi!'.i.aaicn for a
report .
(a)
-11-
Amendment to
Chap. 16.16 CHC.
[Calif. Electrical
Code
I
i
¡1st reading Ord.
No. 1567
App. 1-GPA-91 6-
2-U-91, Terry
Brown, MY Center
MI!I7la œ 'DIB AIG:JS'l' 19, 1991, RlGJIoAR crrr <XOJCTJ.
.......1".Ll'IG (œ-8l8)
Terry Brown, applit"Æ1t, Sðid tbat when be mœ1wd biB
1A_s.LIL a¡:prova1, he r~·.AM to a ftA"'TJ-..1AA4 BUrWIf and
1IIII!I1t aøy £ran the ~'.P....1 path. He felt that that ..
iAL..Lably lID ......UL. '1hiø plan, as 1&--tt.!d, is sim 1... to
Plan F. He reviewed Plan F fraD ..-.... f. He stated be bas
ŒI1e a study &DId atteIIpted to .......ket the plan &DId sell the
site, bIt with no suooe&s. Be £-1A the a...~-L plan
umnot be made to work. He felt that be n"'II,1tt not gøt
<X1Ip1et;e .....,-"cial use œ the site &DId that the plan
iAL..')S-tlad has a little 8CJIIBthing far everycœ. He:tllted
that be felt be CXAÙð put in a CDM!!II1imœ stu.... of abaut
2400 sq. ft. For CIW'-....n-te1y 4800 sq. ft. ar DDnt, be
oould provide all the øerviœs a...~aùUy there. AnIas of
ocnœrn at Planning er-iAoaien~: 1) per~ is..-
such as parking, traffic, noise, &DId privacy intrusicn; 2)
the ~al ..........qA.. of losing . .....-...d.al øpM"I; &DId 3)
project desicp. HI:'. Brown stated that be .....,1tt li1œ
Council to give op.aral c:liJ:ecticn to the p1A1'111ing
t'rMfti_ien far this kind of de\.-1.,··.....L CD this site. Be
'Ð11ti 1&2)Set'V8 the ~al .JI_-~4.. of less .......--..d.al,
senior lxIusing, and tawnbaœs. He urged (bI"""; 1 to CIW'-...18
the ~al plan ~''''''''·-,L &DId let him rp back to the
Planning rronni ABien to work out the desicp.
RI!i~; 8:40-8:50 P.M.
Mayor ~I stated tbat the pj,lic hearing.. new open
&DId requested that indivMn.1A limit their pœsentat1cns to
three JIIÏm1te8 eIId1.
AIm AngBr, 10185 m.pire Avsme,~, said that she
can't a11eY8 øay everything in three minutes. She has
........t-J 35 yeers to iJIprove tb1ta Vista. She is not "9'int¢
'nIrry Ih...-n's project &DId 8\.Iw"l.ed it ari-;¡;....11y. She
urged ()'w"""; 1 to Iœep IbJta Vista -law prnf'i1~-.
Mayor lfqp-1 """""uv-I that three minutes bad p-øed,
(bIJrr-. Go»-n requested tbat ~- testifying state the
œme of bID st.u..e6 they .....,Jrl li1œ in the center if they
went any œtail.
Dick Hayes, 10460 Madera Drive, øpoØ in . 'W)9itim to the
project as it too severely r-to..- retail. He requested
that there be a median sized """..........~ store &DId øpe'"i.lty
shcpe. He felt there ware bID issues: N1at does the
20,000 sq. ft. reducticn of retail -- a ~ of
cMract:er? He pointed out the difference betlÆen retail
space and ' . .,...... cial "I"".... and said that fraD the railroad
tracks to the iAL,~:Bed ;¡reject, there are 12,500 sq. ft. of
-12-
I
I
I
I
I
.
MIlÐŒS œ 'DiE AIGJS'l' 19, 1991, RI!GJLAR crrr CCQCIL
.........u(; (a:-818)
retail œ the BOUth side of St:eIIena Creek Boulevard and
36,000 sq. ft. CI'1 the north side of the boulevatd,
incl"rtiIWJ 29,000 sq. ft. in the ~ S~.iL Mx1ta vista Center.
HIlyer Kqpù 8IIl""~ that three minutea had puaed.
Mr. Hay\!I8 stated that he protests this limit and intends to
ta1œ sane legal act:.iœ.
City Attorney Kilian stated that the (])air can put
reBSCX1IIble tbœ cxmstraints CI'1 a speaker as la1g as it is
done for all. '!here is also the qJticn of eœleOlà eløe
willing to give túm time, rather than use it thœøelves.
.
'1\iO Jkl<2.i:-.e of the .."rHI'!I1œ piAl'rl hands at that point,
stating that they ...",1" give their time to Mr. Hayes.
Mr. Hayes then questimed why Cbuncil "'8S CDlSidering the
new ~,~. '!here is DCJIf a zero vacancy rate far retail
~,¥=L)' CI'1 the Ib1ta vista strip that is actively œ the
Jœr1œt. '!be area will ß'uw.n. L retail. He urged that
Cbuncil look before they lesp CI'1 this. He stated he .....,M
turn his data Oller: to I'h"""; 1 and ....~ why the City has a
GeIIeral Plan if it is not fol1næd. He as1œd why
devel.cþ:.... routinely b1y in 0JpertinD for prices above what
it ~Ild bring for a.u......d.. use am 8I1B\-..cd his questic::o by
stating it _ ~- de\Ielq:Iers knew that the use ",11M
be ~. Mr. Hayes did .,;-Ir in ~rt of bringing the
}OW,i Mjngs to the ..L.._L.
~L """,,,,,.1_..,,, 22008 n.-U Place, ~"'i"" S~ILing the
08kdell RaDch II ..- -~. .., read a letter frail WIIyne
I.ellenfeld into the lOO<AALd. Mr. I.ellenfeld 'U" Bed the
review/it; ..,,;¡ssiœ of the new plan and stated that CI'lly the
a¡:pMl ..MI1M be beIm:S. He œjected to the 1&.....-oS used.
Mr. '/111...._.1..,..." stated that he 00es agree with Mr. IBIIenfeld
in pr;""';p"'l.
.
!kIw.in BL...., 21852 Oakview Lane, ~v -sed the pllln. He
stated it is mt in .....¡f.)l'....·...... with the neil1borhood. He
felt it .......'M try to IIII1:ch the 6-8 urûts per acre and that
the ~l,'I..,-.L include only duets and no triads. He
stated the qúnial that the structures are massive and too
hi~. He felt that a 4:1 ratio sOOuld be used. His
preference for bID stores wculd be a food store such as a
7-11 and IS small restaurant. He stated he is willing to
......I"'''""ise reg¡miing the plans, but still thinks it is too
dense .
-13-
MDI7ŒS œ '!HE AIG)ST 19, 1991, RI!GJLAR crrr CXDCIL
..........uG (0:-818)
Qnm Pa1g Ng, 10009 Oakleaf Place, stated that the 1atest
~.'V.....l à;)eø &Ji:h..,.,s IIDre of the ~l......d ...............08.
lie 1IIIII1ts no DDr8 than 20 haœs aD1 1010111" lilœ to be
involved with the reøolut.ia1 of the project. lie stated be
.....,11'1 li.1œ a use for this site so he wOI1M not have to lœep
".."ing back to 0:Juncil meetings. His preference for st......_
1IIOUld be a fresh prnrIov-e stare, auch as Franzella's and a
rhil""e1's store that 1IIOUld include books and lII18ic far
d1ildræ. Eleven tl1cwuorvI square feet retail 1II1II8
aooeptable. lie stated that viable parking and the øtaœ
ftœt towards the street _ necessary.
Ann RåJertøcn, 21979 <Jakdoo>ll Place, expressed the qrlniœ
that she feels Mr. Brown is going in It better direc:ticn.
1t:IIiIeIIer, she is not u..Wfortable with tri-plexes and felt
the most der1øity 811ÿm øhculd be duplexes. '.DIe retail
still existing ST -.. adequate. As far as types of retail
she .....,1ti like to Bee go in, she ~eesed preferenœ for It
fresh prrvi''''''' store, e&pe"i..lly P'rImzella's, aD1 a freøh
fish and poultry market.
Sally BreIman, 19917 'l\dli.cjrt: Court, "'''¥L s~Ling 0Jpertin0
Chnn"Úty Services, øtreøøed the iDpJrtanœ of .-oift("
housing aD1 ç-l.....- Mr. Brcwn far trying to get .-o~.....
oo.l8ing. '!be General Plan says that JIDt'8 musing and
""'.i.ty are ne -IArt "JI'ftJ the main oorri.dars. In regard to
retail, she stated preference far a CCIM!!IÚenCe-type 61:......
with IIDre ~_ and a rh;¡~'s focused store.
Helmy Hfersping, ~ of Hendrick's at the oaks ~ing
Center, ca1h.....øed fh'tV'; 1 œgardinq the need for .-oi.....
musing. Sbe stated her 1øJsing rent is ~ fmD $700 a
IIICI1th to $800 a 1IICI1th. Sbe is øelf-BIJR1Orting and there is
a fear that older people will tJe...,,,, ~Ieøs. Sbe urged
that 0:Juncil ..11..... for the "";lding of .-o;nt' affu..,1Ahle
oo.!Øi ng.
Patrick )Ii 11 i'JlU1, 10018 Oakleaf Place, provided a
~dL....epective of wbIIt has been 1&,¥,ud and the new
altemlltive. lie felt the new alternative is a fine
~. ...i_. It is a respoose to the neitIborhcod and the
Planning t'nmt; AS:i.a1. He suggested that the IIaJeY that
staff is re-. .,.,~.Jing for the survey IIÜ41t be used to study
wbIIt has hawcaJed in MxIta vista and Wy retail has
failed. His choice of stores .....,1ti be far an iœ ..........
atore and a fresh food store, including bBkeIy, ~1Oe,
neat and poultry.
-14-
MDI7D!:S œ 'IBB AlGJST 19, 1991, RI!G1LAR crrr a:ucn.
.......:.-.uG (0:-818)
Ø)llie I1Iolp-, 1384 MIIripoøa, San Jose, ~....... Bt.JUnq
øeniors en -.i.ting lists, including biD far Sunnyview, CI'lly
~'ee there is 110 place else far thBn to gJ, stated that
'n!rry Brown has been ext:.reIœly . oq:¡e.....u.ve. Her
øuggestia1Ø for retail far the c:IiEIvo&L"·'...lL 'oICUld bel a _11
supeIJMr1œt and a fresh fish DBrIœt:.
1M Bloan, 22150 Wlt11"Oe Drive, told en"".; 1 that they are
......... Ber..Ling 0Jpertin0. He as1œd hew this 1&'~Bed
develqment helps QJpertino. '.DIe citizens Goals lhnnittee
far the General Plan ¡q:portecI subøirli..-f housing. '1his is
an .,.."......i.c issue. COUncilIllJ8t 811}' what is ne i"Ci here.
In regard. to retail, his preference was far a major
BUpeU.ar1œt, sud1 as a r.x:ky ar Safeway.
Phil Zeitman, 22907 cricket Hill, aaid·he does not 1i!œ
that spot vacant, but the issue is the Genclcal Plaa1. tmk
is gJing en at PIAnn;IVJ QJmdasia1 with the Gen.:...cal Plan,
but City (b¡"""; 1 ~ acting CI'1 thingø am taking apart
the General Plan. In regard. to his choice for retail
there, he øug]I!Sted a CXXM!IÚ.enoa store.
As there _ 110 CI'18 else 1& e_L We wiA~ to BpMk, MIIyDr
Kqpel ðßIV'Jlm.-t that the public bearing _ cloBed.
It was IIDIIed by en1'1('. Go i...... and ku....dt.d by en""..
~.. to refer the ~licat.iœs to the Planning Ccmni.ssia1
fOr a ~ t with the di.rectico that there are biD opt:ia1aJ:
1. '1\) qualify UDder the O""~"'"'L Ger.e1:cal Plan
. . ....-. cla1 ~]8h'9 rate, the project IIIJ8t cxmta.in
501 .._._._.~ m;n;...... Senior affordable hooø;ng
ar any affordable housing am be CDUI1ted with the
I]I...._.~.
2. Any project }'L'1I.:øed requiring a Gen.:...cal Plan
JII·....·I.·-·L IIIJ8t have the yco....cal ~L of the
....i'1'.....b..ud and review by the Planning lhnniaeim
with 20 -hnuse units """';""", 15,000 sq. ft. of
first floor retail mini....., a IIIÍIÚJIUn of six
.......i",.. affordable units, be within the !b1ta vista
9"in..1i..- and amsider north to south gr-iing.
(1.,.._, ...ï.al area sInùd be IfL..o:d. frart:agB and
angled parking CI'1 the sL..~ sInùd be explored.
Mr. Brcwn stated that a 50-50 project .....'ld be diHicult.
He will ~ with the bnœdiate nei9Jborhood which he
identified as the 011-11 area and Mann Drive, but did
state it wculd be hard to quantify ~rhood stJRXrt.
-15-
.
pp. 81,119,
mending Ord.
20(1 )
.
ego Dec.
ranted
st reading
rd. 1568
.
MIR11ZS ~ THB AlUJST 19, 1991, nG(J1M crrr <DH:IL
...........uG (CI:-818)
'lba IIIOticn .. AIiIý'l!ld \I1IOI1~nr.IJ81y.
47. Appliœticn 81,119 - City of 0Jpertin0 - ~i"'",,·cdJœ
of _.....~ing Qrrti.....",., lb. 220(1), 8ectiœ 128,
~ ()JaSi-pnh1i... (BQ) h,i1t4i"91 to ..11.-
rotating shelter 1&..."..-' 1Dvù... -La!
DetemIiœtion: 'lba pllllming n-nmi...iœ p.... -do the
grIIDt.inr of a Negative Dec::laratiœ. Pb . . . ....~ far
~""'8l.
(a) First r-I;ng of Qtrl;- lb. l568: -An
Qrrti_ of the City <:'OIl1",..i 1 of the City of
QIpertino ..........ing Sec:t.icn 128.1 of Qrrii_ lb.
220(1) Relating to F'~ Public Ani 1t4~'1gII,
O...i-PubUc 9ni 1I'Ih...... m 'l'ransportati. ZcDe.-
l'bllawing revisIf of the staff I."¥""L by Mr. 0cIIIm, Catb8y
~, 0Iair of the Sbelter BoIIrd, stet'l!ld that it ..
tiiHi~t to ~le IIDœ tMn 15-20 at a time; hclJ8I.W, 25
.. doIIble.
Mr. 0cIIIm stated also that be is reo ....,__Ung that the fee
be wived.
SIIlly BL~u,,"", 0Jpertim n-mity Services, stated &be..
proud of this and ew]~v4ooñ I"no"""'¡ 1 .
It 1l1li8 JII:MIId by C001DC. ~.., *.ntooil by I"no..".. &...~ 1m
and ,,"Bed '.......iM"QIly (4-0) to ,*-...L a !fe.,.+: {ve
Dec1.arat.i.œ.
It .. _.~~....... ~., ..........:Itd by I"no....... &...~ In
and F--ncl ly (4-0) to CWL...18 the IIß)1.icaticD per
Pll11ming n-n.nt...im Reøolutia1lb. 4353.
It .. _..IId by Coo",.... &...~ .-..0, "' n"- by t"(JIJD('. Q:Iol"-n
and r II j '.......inr.lJ81y (4-0) to reIId Qrrti.....-o lb. l5ð8 by
title aaly and the City Clerk'. r--t;ng to .........--Utute the
fint r--t~ng tb....-d:.
It .. _.~ by <bmc'. Sw~ ~, _n.-wj by I"no... ~..
and peeeed '.......inr.lJ81y (4-0) to ~ the wiviDI.J of
the fee.
It .. JII:MIId by t"(JI1I'V". lL,p.., ..........1ed by Coo... Sw~-'
and pueed '.......inraJSly (4-0) to authorize the Di.œctar of
n-mity Dewl"l"-jL to ..11... the project to """.. -.i until
the 0Idinance is effective.
-16-
HIlf1JIS œ '1HE Jv.ißil' 19, 1991, RIGJIM. em a:ncn.
~..~ (CC-818)
48. .llpp-l of Planning lhmIi,,!,sicn denia1. of .IIßùJ.œticns
6-0-91 and 4-~91, Grand AWIJUe A. J. JIpplicat.iœ
4-'M-91 provides far a lot split and wu .w.ied.
'lb.:...a!01..., the Use Pemit _ not ÇPI.'OWd. '!he
project is located at the øoutheIIst 0.......... of Grand
AWIme and Santa Clara AWIme. (Terry J. MIIrtJn,
Pararpl Desjql Group, Inc., 6ß'e 11 "'tt) .
Ro.,p. Gri£fin of PanIq:n DesÏ91 Group, Inc., ~ S_JUng
DIInie1 Puentes, said be hðd met with adjat'81t 1&....-.Lj'
owners and they 1IIIBt'8 <¥ -"le in regard to adjustjng the .
i""....-.Lj' line. 'lbere are various size lots in the area.
He """t"'-øed the œHIIIIf that a duplex: ....,.,,,.. be out of ......le
in the ex:isting r-ig.J...huud. He also feels that
enœuraging þ..,~ is a positive thing to em.
D!lniel Puentes, 1&,,¥=Lj' owner and œsi.dent, said be will
be œsirli"9 in CI'18 of the i""'~Bed h..,_. Mr. Grif'f'in has
desi~ t10ID hc.uc.. across the st:œet am those 1&' ~:ud
will be ,..,i'aUble. He wculd ~ n-."""¡1 GK'Luv'al.
. Staff 1"- ....,~ .iItt-...ia1 to the Planning Chnni -sial WII!I8 far
~ with larger øet'haciœ than pk.,v-:sed and a r-tov-d
floor area ratio. '1h9 applicant has amplied with both of
the staff r-." ............Jat.ia1s.
Mr. Griff;n explained the lot line adjusbœnt. He stated
be _ ~,¥""e1 to amply with the øet'Ml+a.
Nedine P-n-t, attorney''''''¥L B íLing Mrs. Virc.J:Jø, a
I1Ai'1'mr, stated that &be, too, is in ðy&.-.....·-.L to the lot
line adjusbœnt and the plan as 1& s~Led.
Ed 9l.oaa "-bod wbat the aquare fcot:aga diffbL.,......" WII!I8
bet,'UD a .45 and a .50 floor area ratio.
Ann ADger, Pree~"-t, JbJta vista ~u.~L Associaticn,
~.o" in favor of the applicatiœs.
Mr. Griffin stated that in a house with the square feet
"";"9 1&'~. nd, the .45 FAR, rather than a .50 .....'lti be of
a s;~;f'iosnt amount.
It _ IIDIIed by Counc. Sorensen, -......Jt.d by 0,01111". ~.
and passed urvm;~ly to GK'Lu¥e the granting of a
Negative Declaratia1.
-17-
Appeal, App.
6-U-91 & 4-TK-
Grand Ave. Hon
Neg. Dec.
granted
.
Density Bonus
ordinance
.
g. Dec.
anted
.
MIII7D!IS œ 'DIB ~r 19, 1991, RI!GCIM crrr ..... 111
.........uG (œ-818)
It .. _.1Od by Qux:. a:.y..... , ~.dt:od by now...... !L..-,'"«1
am p--tIed "ru"'~""'UII1y to grant the ~l, a¡:pt'DViDg the
app1.icat:.iaJø with a .50 FAR aIXl set"MI1æ adjusted with
amditiœs _ per 1bt1ihit A for Appliœti.on No. 6-0-91 and
1bt1ihit B for Appliœtiœ 4-'JH-9l.
49. O:Ðøideratiœ ol A¡plicatia1 81,120 - -Vi"" of
deœity bams cm:!i.œnœ which ':I'-allls at least 25' aIXl
cme ackiiticnal uuœss.iœ to cIeve~. 1oIbo ""':1'-.... to
amst:roct WD:y law, law aIXl senior citizen housing.
EnviraJœntal Deter:minaticn: '.DIe Planning n-ill..iœ
~. ....-odt. the gœnting ol a Negative Dec1araticn.
RJe.. ....-d:d for GK&wal.
(a) First r-ii"'1 of Ordinance No. 1569: 'An
Ordinance ol tho City .:ouncl1 ol the City of
Qp.Jrtino JIdcpt:ing am IDp1ementing the State
Density Bcnus.·
Following presentatiœ by lbJsing aIXl Serv:! œs 0xmiinIItar
Norling, the mstter we cp!I1 for public .input.
Ed Rlnaq asJœd hew other cities have bmxned this state
requirement. He _ inf·.. ...".:1 that other cities .....,Jrl be
ñQi"9 1IIbat QJpertjD) is doiIç.
Dick Odldress, p.oqvnt Canym, said that IID8t cities have
à:me a pear jœ reg¡m1ing affordable housing. a...~c:Ut.ly,
be is in Hollister wrIdng CI'1 8CIIIB affw.·l.oohl~ lølsinq. He
stated that the ilL' '1' led mdinance is a step in the rlqJt
dir-+ilW1; hcuev..., be felt that cwnerabip units are
better .
Pbil zeitmm, 0Jair of aJRB, stated that ~r-:r Jrnoroo8 the
City bBø not JIBt the affUl.·1oohl.. housing - 18. A lfDuDing
ð1---t IIIJ8t be œ,-l<p3d that is ...·1....tib1e to both the
City and the state. He referred to dIanges in 1:be H:Dta
Vista Plan and stated that he still does DOt see ':bat the
c:.:ity WDtø 6!fI.....,1oohl.. housiIç. He also felt thaI: the City
.mnl11tt he able to include the unincatporated ~ within
the ~'" ol inf1""ooe in cIetetmining the jd:ø/lnlSinq
ratio. He aslœó for a clarificatia!. of œrtain i1:ell8 in
the arrliNITV'JIII and stated that there .....,Jrl be no need far a
Geœlal Plan if the State 1œeps IIIIIXSating requinments.
It _ IIDIIed by 0:J\Jn(', ~'" Sðu.A..bl by Cbunc. SorsIsen
am r-ased lIn8IliDDusly (4-0) to "i¥'-\N'e the granting ol a
Neglltive Declarati.cn.
-18-
MIlÐŒS œ '!HE AtDJST 19, 1991, RmnAR crrr CXQ¡I('II,
~.I.·uC (<X:-818)
It .. JIDINId by Q,unc. ~D, ~,j¡,d by CWnc. Go}"-n
and I"''J8ed UDIUÚJIIJUSly (4-0) to CHALU1Ie the çliœtico per
P1Am1i"'1 thnni"lJ.ia1 Reøolutia1 No. 4358.
It _ JIDINId by n,o....... Sorensen, ~,j¡,d by 0:Junc. Gol"-n
and J?t'I8øed UDIUÚJIIJUSly (4-0) to ræd om;....""" No. 1569 by
title ally aD1 the City Clerk's reeding to cxmstitute the
f.irst ~i"'1 tbe...,u!.
50. Þw-1 of Architectural and Site A¡~ thnn~ttee
act:iœ, Applicatia1 ASiIC 51,910.2, ".\.<a) ~,.
10625 North DeAnza Bou1e\raJ:d, requiring reduct:.ia1 of
existing sign cabinet fran 36 incbes to 24 inœeø.
(De!m D. PLcy=......, PLcy=1Ml and Rictmm, ~11aat).
Director of Canrunity Dellelq..",,)L Cowan reviewed the
previcus actiaIs with 0:Juncil.
De!m D. PLcy=...A1, ~ 11>mt, said AR(D is not asking far
enything new, but is ally asking to keep existing square
footage. '!be st.atia1 is riumg;i"'1 the paint oolar and
1IIDIding. 'DIe a¡:plicant has alreIIdy ....,......d to the
illœdnating cxn1i.tiCI'1. He 1& s....!Lt:d phat:oø of the staticn
and of a CbevIa1 and Shell st.atia1 in Q]pert.ino.
Bci) Haxsi.e, .."¥'- s lUng the Architeci::ura1 aD1 Site
A¡pmval thnnittee, expl...i.-.! why they bed Jœde their
.w.t..itw1 and provided eddiH.......l infoJ:Jœti.cn. ASiIC felt
the letters are too largB, the overall ~ is too largIt,
the si9J8 are intrusive, they "'O'"rl have prefbu'l:lCl caly
"AR(D ~. as seen CI'1 other st:atiœs. 'D1ey also felt
that there _ NioootpJate 1111"" ""j "'1 now.
It _ JIDINId by n-........ s......~ an, _ ...-Iow! by n-.!n('. a..."....D
and J?"'vøed 11rumi~ly (4-0) to grant the ~1 and
requi:ce AR(D to provide the eddit-i.......l 1amscaping.
At 11:40 p.m., the meeting _ adjourned to 7:00 p.m.,
Au9Jst 20.
~.&: Ú~
~ éity Clerk
-19-
I
!
¡
I
I
I
I
I ht reading of
lOrd. 1569
I
j
Appeal, App. ASAC
51,9l0.2-ARCO