CC 05-31-90
, ,
t
CITI OF aJPERI'lNO I STATE OF CAL.IfORNIA
10300 'IORRE AVENUE, ~, CA 95014
TELEPHCNE: (408) 252-4505
MINlJI'ES OF '!HE ADJaJRNED REnJIAR CITY CXXJNCIL ~
HErD CJti· MAY 31, 1990, cnIF'ERrnCE ROC.t1S C &. D, CITY HAIL
10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTIN::>, CALIFORNIA
CC-79OC
CAlL 'ro ORDER
'!he meetirq was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by Mayor
Rogers .
Ca.mc. Present:
Goldman, Kq:pel, Sorensen, Szabo, Mayor Rogers
staff Present:
City Manager Brown
City Clerk COrnelius
Director of Public Wœ:Jœ viskavidl
others Present:
Will KeIIpta¡, Santa Clara COOnty Traffic Authority
æAL cx:IKJNICATIœs - Na1e.
1. study session to review information pertaininq to the
þLV\A2JS of devel~ing base data and traffic projection
for the General Plan Transportation Element study and
the resolution of mitigating the loss of "'~EI to
stevens Creek Boulevard frail oorthbound 280.
Director of Fublic Works viskavidl said that material beinq
pnsellted to the Council is a derivative of the
Met.rcp)litan Transportatim ChIoni....ion and Associatim of
Bay Area GoYerrIIIents --.iø 1 . '!his is to be used as a tool
to judge different alternatives. Mr. V1skcvidl reviewed
different scenarios as }AI. s _,Led in the diagrams attacñed
to his staf:' L"'t"'LL. 'Ihe --.iøl ....- a four-lane bridge
at Mary if Mary is opened.
will Keq:tat stated that he is oonoemed because ..mat is
beirq presented is ......ILLcIIy to other stu:ties that shew a
reduction in CUpertino traffic with the cx:tIpletim of
Highway 85. What Mr. Viskavidl shows is just a shift of
'-1-
,.
~
MINl1I'ES OF '!HE MAY 31, 1990, AIlJOORNED REX>UIAR CITY cnJNCIL
MœI'ING (œ-79OC)
traffic pattems resultirq frail the aeXlitianal capacity
frail Higrn.1ay 85, whereas 85 actually provides overall
iJIprovement. '!his dces net shaw any =ntractim of the
peak period, Wich may booane one hoor instead of 3-4
haIrs .
Mr. viskcvich said that Highway 85 is good, rot QJperti.no
IIIJSt be careful in doirq its General Plan. '!he material
beinq PI :'S='llted to Council includes the ID-year ABI\G
projectim with no n:M (Traffic Demani Mar.ageme¡It) figured
in.
Mr. KeI\pta'1 said that, as of rY::M, ABI\G figures have been
accurate.
Mr. viskcvich said the consultant has prepared 1IIXIels and
the CUpertino 1II<Yiøl is consistent with san Jose's.
It was mcved by Counc. Sorensen, secarrled by Counc. Goldman
and l'"'~-9d unaniJlr::¡usly to forward all traffic 1II<Yiøl
infomatim to the r~l", Chnnittee for use in the General
Plan ~. ~'5'.
It was mcved by Counc. Iq:pel, secorx!ed by Counc. Sorensen
and p"ee9d unanimously to include the a........."e i ...... as part
of the transp,ortatim eldu&IL in the General Plan review
tAL" .106.ð_.
Hr. Kspt:a\ stated that the Traffic Authority is totally
agailwt closinq off ~e to 85 frail northbcun:l 280.
'!here is still up to $3 millim l'Y'mOIIi tted for mitigatim
should that hawa.. '!he City and Traffic Authority need to
0CIIIe to terms in use of those funds so they can be
reJ.-~. Next week, Hr. KeDpton will be meeting with
caltrans.
GoLd&.., Frolich, Belknap Court, said two years ago, City
Council directim was that there be no c....:b...lI!tim of
private prcp!rty. He 5I.XJgeSted that Council may wish to
rec......ider that positim.
It was pointed out that the sirqle-lane a........."a may be an
operatia1al i"""'le rather than a liability issue. If there
is any dec:isim regardirq criteria for closirq the açoese,
caltrans should net be the sole P.'.ialuator of 'When that
criteria is perœi.ved to have been met.
-2-
·
MnVl'ES OF '!HE MAY 31, 1990, ADJOORNED RESJIAR CITY CXXJNCIL
MEEl'IN; (œ-79OC)
It was IIICVed by COIn::. Goldman, seoc:n:ied by Oounc. I<'qpel
and pae",«, UM1ÙJID,¡sly to ~L=8ively plrSUe the timinq
i'"«le for RD.tte-~ 280 and 85 with the Authority and
caltrans.
At 7:55 p.m., Oouncil adjoomed.
iéI ~¿ .
Ci ClerK
-3-