The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 01-07-02 AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Monday January 7, 2002 6:45 p.m. CITY COUNCH, MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATFERS - PRESENTATIONS POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. 6:50 (5) CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of thc public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 1. Approval of minutes: Dec~mber 3, 4, and 17. 2. Accounts Payable: Decei~ber 14, 21, and 28, Resolution Nos. 02-001 through 02-003. 3. Payroll: Decen~ber 21 and January 4, Resolution Nos. 02-004 and 02-005. 4. Extend the participation of the City of Cupertino in the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVASA), Resolution No. 02-006. 5. Acceptance of improv¢~iients (may include grading, street improvements on site and off- site impwvements): Tbinh H. and Ruby T. Nguyen, 10325 Orange Avenue, APN 357- 15-060. 6. Reallocation of Senior Civil Engineer to Assistant Public Works Director (a) Appwval of Assistant Public Works Director position (b) Resolution No. 02-007: Amending Resolution No. 00-185, Policy No. 4 to add auto allowance to new classification of Assistant Public Works Director January 7, 2002 Cupertino City Council & Page 2 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 7. Award of a contract to Republic Electric in the amount of $89,350 and an approximate contingency amount not to exceed $10,000 for signal modifications at Blaney and Stevens Creek. 8. Accept gif~ from Apple Computer and authorize the Mayor to send a thank you letter. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) PUBLIC HEARINGS 6:55 (30) 9. Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 09-U-01, regarding a use permit for the continued use of a shopping center parking lot for car storage at 10071 S. Blaney Avenue (APN 369-03-014). The appeal was filed by the applicant, Gary Schmidt. (Continued fi'om December 3). 7:25 (10) 10. Public nuisance abatvi-ent: Public hearing to consider abating a public nuisance (vacant lot containing an accumulation of trash and debris) at 10200 Stem Avenue (APN 375 12 002, Patrick W. McGrath property owner), Resolution 02-008. 7:35 (15) 11. Request for a Municipal Code amendment to define what constitutes a second living unit, application No. 01-MCA-01. This project was initiated by the City of Cupertino and is citywide. The project is categorically exempt and is recommended for approval. Actions to be taken: 1. Approve, modify, or deny application 2. Conduct fh-st reading of the ordinance First reading of Ordinance No. 1891: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 19.08, Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Structures/Buildings of the Cupertino Municipal Code Concerning Definitions and Related to Accessory Buildings/Stmcturos and Second Dwelling Units in Single-Family Zones." PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS 7:so (15) 12. Preparation of action minutes for all televised me,tings. s:05 (5) 13. Appointment of one council me~iber to serve on a Policy Advisory Board (PAB) for the Comprehensive County Expressways planning Study. January 7, 2002 Cupertino City Council & Page 3 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency s:lo (is) 14. Designating preferential parking on Tula Court, 8 a.m. - 12 p.m. first Saturday of each month, Resolution No. 02-009. s:2~ (15) 15. Designating preferential parking on Clearcreek Court, 6 p.m. - 2 a.m. Friday through Sunday, Resolution No. 02-010. s:40(~) 16. Consider adding a second meeting on January 15 to conduct interviews for boards and commissions. ORDINANCES - None STAFF REPORTS s:45 (5) 17. Revenue and expenditure status report. s:50 (5) 18. Falun Gong report. COUNCIL REPORTS CLOSED SESSION - None AD,IOURNMENT Adjourn to a study session at 1:30 p.m. in the Cupertino Senior Center Bay Room, 21251 Stevens Creek Boulevard, to discuss recreational services. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled for lack of business. DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Monday Dec~ber 3, 2001 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 7:16 p.m. Mayor Lowcnthal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff prcscnt: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith, Public Works Director Ralph Quails, Public Info,-~afion Officcr Rick Kitson, Senior Plauner Vera C-il, Senior Planner Peter Gilli, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Assistant City Attorney Eileen Murray, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 1. Annual Report of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Frank Selinch presented the report in PowerPoint presentation. The report reviewed their accomplishments in 2001 and their three main goals for 2002. POSTPONEMENTS Item No. 12, appeal regarding a shopping center parking lot on Blaney Avenue, was continued to January 7, 2002. The public hearing was opened at 7:31 p.m. James moved to: 1) Continue the item to Jan,,~ry 7 and 2) Indicate that the appeal would not be continued past that date. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Kwok abstaining. grRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS · A letter dated November 27 from thc City of Sunnyvale regarding the Mary Avenue Footbridge (Item No. 15 on the agenda) · A letter dated December 3 from Nagamani Nataraj opposing the Mary Avenue · Footbridge · -. · A letter received December 3 from Robert Gicbeler in favor of the Mary Avenue Footbridge December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 2 A map of 20075 De Palma Lane (Item No. 13 on the agenda) plus a list of staff- recommended actions ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue offered congratulations to the new Mayor and City council members. Lucia Wu, Chair of the Moon Festival, thanked Cupertino for hosting the festival. She presented the hand-painted Moon Cake box to the City for display and read a lctter of congratulations from President George Bush regarding the Moon Festival. Lowenthal accepted both items on behalf of the City. The Council members thanked Ms. Wu for her work. CONSENT CALENDAR Sandoval moved to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as recommended. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 3. Treasurer's Budget Report - October 2001. 4. Accounts Payable, November 16 and 21, Resolution Nos. 01-246 and 01-247. 5. Payroll, November 21, Resolution No. 01-248. 7. Approvc the donation of rccords from the City Clerk files, which are in excess of two years old and are of historical interest, to the Cupertino Historical Society, Resolution No. 01-249. 8. Public nuisance abat¢iiient: Set public hearing to consider abating a public nuisance (vacant lot containing an accumulation of trash and debris) at 10200 Stem Avenue (APN 375 12 002, Patrick W. McGrath property owner), Resolution 01-250. 9. Fee Waiver from State of California Employment Development Depa~h~cnt (EDD) Tax Branch and the local Internal Revenue Service in the approximate amount of $70.00 for a free employment tax seminar at the Quinlan Community Center on January 23, 2002. 10. Acceptance of improvements (may include grading, street improvements on site and off- site improvements): Steve Zankich, Zanldch Construction, 10281 Imperial Avenue; Gregory & Joan Price, 18671 Starrett Court, APN 375-26-023 (no documentation in packet). 11. Authorization for the City Manager to approve an amendment to the Agreement for Architectural Design Services with SMWM for schematic design of the Civic Center Plaza and Impwvements projects in an amount not to exceed $165,000 and a provision December 3, 2001 Cup~fino City Council Page 3 for up to $50,000 in additional services as may bc required solely at the City's option and approved by the Director of Public Works. Votc Members of the City Council AYES: Lowenthal, Chang, Jnmes, Kwok, Sandoval NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) 2. Approval of minutes, November 19. James clarified that page number 2-9, ire-, No. 30 should be corrected to read, "She said that she would not object to Council member Chang choos'mg 2 more commissioners if that was the recommendation of the Teen Commission, but abe still felt that it wasn't the right message to give to young people." James moved to approve the minutes of November 19 as amended. Chang seconded and the motion carded 3-0 with Kwok and Sandoval abstaining. 6. Revenue and expenditure status report. Lowenthal said that there needed to be a mandatory check on the City's budget status. So he pulled this item from the consent calendar in order to hear the report from finance. Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood reviewed the highlights of the report. James moved to accept the report. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Apphcation 09-U-01, regarding a use permit for the continued use of a shopping center parking lot for car storage at 10071 S. Blaney Avenue (APN 369-03-014). The appeal was filed by the applicant, Gary Schmidt. (Applicant requests continuance to January 7, 2002). At the beginning of the meeting, Council moved to continue this item to San. 7, 2002, and noted that the appeal would not be continued past that date. 13. Approve Use Permit to construct 8 single family townhomes on an approximately one acre parcel and rezoning of an approximately one-acre parcel from RI-10 to P(Res); Tentative map to subdivide an approximately one-ac~e parcel into 8 townhome lots and 1 . common lot; Application Numbers: 08-U-01, 06-Z-01, 03-TM-01, 14-EA-01; R&Z _ Development. The project is located at 20075 De Palma Lane; APN 369-32-003. A Negative Declaration was previonsly granted on November 19, 2001. December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 4 A. Second reading of Ordinance No. 1889: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Rezoning a 1.04-Acre Lot from RI-10 to P(Res) to Allow 8 Single-Family Townhonses Located at 20075 Dc Palina Lane." City Attorney Charles Kilian said that Council member Kwok had participated on this ite~-~-~ as a Planning Commission member and that Kwok indicated that he would abstain fi-om participation. Community Development Director Steve Piasecki reviewed the item and suggested wording for council actions. The public hearing was opened at 7:50 p.m. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project: Tony Fong, 20182 Rodrlgnes Avenue Nelson Dennis, 20055 De palina Lane John Lieu, 20172 Roddgues Avenue Lucy Lieu, 20172 Rodrigues Avenue They were opposed to the trail location along Regnart Creek from Rodrigues Avenue to the back of the units, but not opposed to the development of the property. Glenn Cahoon, designer of the project, said that he changed the design as council directed by reducing each unit appwximately 150 square feet, increasing the setback on one location to 15 feet and straightening out the creek trail and moving it away from adjacent property as much as possible. Mark Roberts, 10227 Adriana Avenue, represented the applicant, R & Z Development Co. He said that they have followed Council direction, the General Plan and all City ordinances for this project. He asked Council to reconsider allowing 9 units, but said that he would try to work with 8 units if Council would allow the size unit to be 2000 square feet. He also asked Council to consider waiving park fees since the site would have a public benefit from the open space and the trail. He asked the Council to clarify that it would indemnify the use of the trail both on the site and on Santa Clara Valley Water District property. He asked for fu~er clarification from Council regarding the trail use both now and later, and asked that the City assume the maintenance for the underlying trail system on and offsite. Community Development D/rector responded to the apphcant's questions. The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James moved and Chang seconded to read . the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitutc thc second reading thereof. The motion carried 4-0 with Kwok abstaining. James moved and Chang seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1889 for zone change No. 06- Z-01. The motion canied 4-0 with Kwok abstaining. Deceit~ber 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page $ James moved to approve the Use Permit No. 08-U-01 for 8 units with 2000 square feet of living area, allow tempora~ gates until the City takes responsibility for the trail and its maintenance, and reference the following 3 bullets taken from the handout: · Approval was based on exhibits titled: "Campo.de Lozano betwccn Rodrigues Avenue and 20075 De Palina Lane, Cupertino, California," consisting of 13 pages labeled: C, S, 1 through 11 dated July 2001, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this approval · A final landscapc plan shall be approved by thc DirecWr of Community Development at the building p~,uit stage · Allowed tcsiiporary gates on the Santa Clara Valley Water District right-of-way Sandoval seconded and the motion carried 3-1, with Chang voting no and Kwok abstaining. James moved to approve Tentative Map No. 03-TM-01adjusted to reflect the 2000 square feet of living area and to reference the following 3 items taken from the handout: · The approval was based on exhibits titled: "Tentative Map, 20075 De Palma lane, Cupertino, California," consisting of 1 sheet labeled: I and dated 11/29/01, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this approval · A final grading and drainage plan shall be approved by the Director of Public Works at the final map stage · Required Park Fees will be revised for 8 townhouse units with a credit for the one single-family detached dwelling Sandoval seconded and the motion carried 3-1-1 with Chang voting no and Kwok abstaining. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS 14. Request from Stevens Canyon Residents Association to consider an amendment to General Plan Policy 2-80 related to public and quasi-public land uses. At 8:40 p.m. City Attorney Charles Kilian abstained from participation and left the room. Assistant Attorney Eileen Murray replaced him. Community Development Director Steve Piasecld did a PowerPoint presentation and answered questions from Council. The following individuals spoke in favor of the item: December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 6 Cfis Wendt, 22600 Ricardo Road, representative from Stevens Canyon Resident's Association Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue Greg Harrison Sharon Blaine, 22284 De Anza Circle Lyn Faust, 11033 Canyon Vista Drive Paul Parker Virginia Fanelli, Principle of Canyon Heights Academy Steve Faust, 11033 Canyon Vista Their comments included the following: · The policy was originally included in the General Plan to make it easier for churches, child-care facilities, convalescent homes and private recreational uses to be located in the neighborhoods which would serve the population · The policy wording is too vague and is not in line with the intent and goals of the General Plan specifically with the hillside development pwvisions. James brought up the policy of applicants needing Council approval first for a General Plan amendment before bringing their plans forward that would require a General Plan amendment. This policy gives the appearance of Council advocating the change in the General Plan by allowing the applicant to apply for a General Plan amendment. She asked that this topic be brought to a future'Council meeting. lames moved to authorize a City-initiated General Plan amendment to evaluate Policy 2- 80. Kwok seconded and the motion carried 5-0. James moved to direct the .Plannlrtg Commission to hold a public hearing to evaluate Policy 2-80, consider how their recommendation to change or delete the policy would affect any applications in progress, and determine the appropriate language or possible deletion of Policy 2-80 and make a recommendation to Council. Sandoval seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 15. Report on Mary Avenue bicycle footbridge feasibility study. Public Works Director Ralph Quails reviewed the staff report. Mr. Steven C-rover gave an ovendew of the Feasibility Study using a powerpoint presentation. Quails said that the consultant gave a preliminary estimate of $4.65 million for conslruction costs and a total project cost estimate of $6.6 million. He said that the current funding commitment from the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) is $3.1 million. December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 7 The following individuals spoke on this item: Gary Tietz, 10520 Castine Avenue Jack Funk, 10679 N~th~n~on Avenue Len Doberne, 1601 Honfleur Drive in Sunnyvale Dieckmann Wolfe, traffic engineer for Sunnyvale Kevin Jackson fi'om Sunnyvale Bob Kundich from Sunnyvale Donald Bumett, 729 Stendhal Lane Joe Walton, 21721 Columbus Avenue, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member Anne Ng, 6031 Bollinger, (BPAC member) David C-reenstein, chair of BPAC Mike Bullock, 21831 Hermosa Avenue Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue Kevin Gregory from Sunnyvale Their comments included the following: · Cost concerns · Potential lack of utilization · A need to survey residents in the affected areas to see if there is interest · That it is important for private property intrusion, noise, graffiti concerns to continue to be addressed · l~aintenance conc~i£~ · The bridge would reduce automobile traffic · The bridge would be money well-spent in comparison with global costs of maintaining the planet · The bridge would help with bus transit · More students could attend Homestead High School relieving some population pressure fi~m Monta Vista High School. Kwok moved to: l) Accept the feasibility study by Steven C.~rover and Associates for the implementation of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge; and 2) Request that the Director of Public Works develop a project implementation schedule and preliminary budget for the project and evaluate the current funding against other sources of potential funding; and 3) Report back to the Council with a schedule and budget with appropriate recommendations in early 2002. James seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 16. Preparation of argument in favor of the March 2002 measure to extend the utility users excise tax. ._ Lowenthal reviewed the purpose of this item. December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 8 Council discussed the pros and cons of having this measure on the November election versus the March election. Council concurred to continue this item to Tuesday, December 4 at 4:00 p.m. 17. Appointments to Council committees. Lowenthnl Animal Control JPA (until rotated to Los Gatos) Economic Development Public Dialog SCC Library JPA West Valley Mayors and Managers SCC Cities Association North Central Flood Alternate Northwest Flood Alternate SCC Cities Legislative Alternate Toyokawa Sister City Alternate VTA PAC Alternate Chang Audit Committee Leadership Cupertino Legislative Review Library Steering Committee Public Dialog SCC Library $PA Alternate West Valley Mayors and Managers Alternate SCC Housing and CDBG Alternate James Economic Development Library Steering Committee SCC Emergency Preparedness Skate Park Santa Clara Valley Water Alternate Environmental Review Alternate Kwok Leadership Cupertino North Central Flood Zone Northwest Flood Zone SCC Recycling December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 9 Santa Clara Valley Water Toyokawa Sister City SCC Cities Alternate Skate Park Alternate Library Steering Committee Alternate Snndoval Audit Committee Environmental Review Committee Legislative Review Committee SCC Cities Legislative Review SCC Housing and CDBG VTA PAC SCC Emergency Preparedness Altotaatc SCC Recycling Alternate ABAG Alternate 15. Consider cancellation of meeting on February 19, 2002. Council concurred to cancel the meeting. ORDINANCES 19. Second reading of Ordinance No. 1890: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Rezoning Approximately 20 Acres of Property Located on Results Way From ML(Light Industrial) to P(ML) (Planned Development Light Industrial)". The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James moved and Kwok seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Thc motion carried 5-0. James moved and Kwok seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1890. The motion carried 5-0. STAFF REPORTS COUNCIL REPORTS CLOSED SESSION At 11:37 p.m. Council adjourned to a closed session rogard~ing pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding Cupertino Citizens for Affordable Housing et al. All Persons Interested in the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project, et al., Case No. CV 793260. December 3, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 10 At 11:50 p.m. Council reconvened in open session. The City Attorney announced that the Council gave direction to its representative to proceed along lines discussed in closed session. AD,IOURNMENT At 11:59 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to Tuesday, December 4 at 4:00 p.m. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk DRAFr MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned Meeting Tuesday December 4, 2001 ROLL CALL At 4:00 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order. City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Patrick Kwok and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: Sandra Sames. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Public Works Dh'ector Ralph Quails, Assistant City Attorney Eileen Murray, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS - None POSTPONEMENTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None -- ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None CONSENT CALENDAR - None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) - None PUBLIC ItEARINGS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS 1. Preparation of argument in favor of the March 2002 measure to extend the utility users excise tax (continued from Monday, December 4). Barbara Rog~ said that the language of the measure needed to be strengthened and suggested that it specifically refer to the library. She said that all five Council members should sign the rebuttal to any argument submitted against the measure and that the election should not be delayed until November. After discussion, the Council members agreed upon the following wording for the .- argument in favor of the measure: December 4, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 2 "In 1990, the voters of Cupertino approved a 2.4% utility tax to fund the capital improvement program, which included the preservation of Blackberry Farm and Creekside Park as permanent open space. These properties are now public parks for all residents to enjoy. In March 2000, Cupertino voters overwhelmingly favored a new library. In order to finance these projects we are asking you to extend the utility users tax until the year 2030 from its sunset of 2015. This is not a new tax but an extension of the current tax, and will not increase your tax liability. Moreover senior citizens will continue to be exempt from this tax. In order to fund the city's capital improvement program, which includes the construction of the new library, it is imperative that the city preserves its ~xisting revenue sourees. The utility tax is 2.4% of electricity, gas, and telephone charges. The utility tax currently provides $2.4 million per year towards capital project financing. The measure would provide that the existing utility users tax be extended from 2015 to 2030. This would allow the city to refinance its debt to pay for capital projects. This will not raise your taxes. A yes vote. will also safeguard the revenues for future capital projects while maintaining a prudent budget reserve. Those projects may include traffic safety, enhanced parks, and the new library. Cupertino residents have always been intelligent visionaries. Your support for past capital improvements has ensured our quality of life in a fiscally responsible manner. Please help our city maintain this vision, without increasing taxes, by voting Yes on Measure The four Council members present said that they would all like to sign the Argument in Favor of the measure, and the City Manager said he would contact Council member James to see if she would also like to sign it. ORDINANCES - None STAFF REPORTS - None COUNCIL REPORTS - None CLOSED SESSION - None December 4, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 3 ADJOURNNI~NT At 6:10 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to Monday,'Dccembcr 17 at 6:00 p.m. for a Council workshop discussion of thc Mary Avenue/Stevens Creek Boulevard Improvement project. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk DRAFT~N~ES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned Meeting Monday December 17, 2001 CALL TO ORDER At 6:05 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order in Conference Room C/D, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council meiiibers Sandra Sames, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Public Info~wation Officer Rick Kitson, Public Works Director Ralph Qualls, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1. Discussion of the Mary Avenue/Stevens Creek Boulevard Improvement project. Public Works Director Ralph Quails reviewed a conceptual layout chart titled "Mary Avenue Civil Improvements Project" which would narrow Mary Avenue by 13 feet, add 12 diagonal spaces by the Senior Center, add bulb-outs at both sides of the intersection, and add a crosswalk with imbedded lights. He said that a budget of $13,000 had been set aside for the design and $187,000 for construction. Council mei~bers noted that this street was originally designed as a freeway offramp and there is an opportunity now to increase the emphasis on pedestrian use. Their ideas for the improvements, included the following: A safe and pleasant way to cross the street with enhanced landscaping and a planted median, possibly with a trellis; a raised crosswalk with a refuge island for pedestrians; reducing the number of lanes by combining the lef~ turn lane with the forward lane, changing the turning movements, and slowing traffic; creating diagonal parking all the way on Mary; and moving the crosswalk to the other side of the Senior Center parking lot entrance. James suggested that staff also talk to owner of the Glenbrook Apaxhvents and the manager of the Oaks Shopping Center. Council members agreed they would accept fewer spaces directly in front of the Senior Center so there can be a wider median in that location. City Manager David Knapp · noted that the bike lane should go straight through to DeAnza College. December 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 2 Planning Commissioner Marc Auerbach said the Commission was considering methods of traffic calming throughout the city, as well ways to create beautiful public works with interesting detail, so the goal does not always have to be low maintenance. He suggested trying parallel parking' on both sides of the street ii' the budget allows, because parked cars act as a buffer for pedestrians. He noted that raised sidewalks also increase the safety for pedestrians, but perhaps both locations should be marked as crosswalks in someway, with one being preferred. Council directed staff' to include additional parking spaces for the Senior Center, add a median, and provide an enhanced, more protected crosswalk from the Senior Center to the Oaks Shopping Center. Quails said that staff would work with the landscape' architect to imploment these ideas and mal~e sure there are no safety concerns. He expected to report back on this matter in March. RECESS Council was in recess from 6:40 p.m. to 6:50 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:50 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith, Public Works Director Ralph Quails, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, Senior Planner Vera Gil, Recreation Coordinator Rich G-onzales, Recreation Supentisor Don McCarthy, City Attorney Charles Kilian, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATI'ERS - PRESENTATIONS 2. Presentation of a plaque recognizing the City of Cupertino as a founding donor for contributing $250,000 to the Hous'mg Trust of Santa Clara County. Chris Block presented a plaque to City Council in addition to 120-day report cards. December 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 3 3. Presentation of a plaque recognizing Helen and Sanford Diller as founding donors for contributing $250,000 to the Housing Trust of Santa Clara County. Chris Block presented a plaque to Pwmetheus Development for their pa~h:ership and support of affordable housing in the community. 4. lSresentafion of a video from Fariba Nejat, president of the Iranian Women's Federation Club, for their support of the Cupertino community. Fariba Nejat and Sharareh Deralch.~handeh showed a video titled "Hand in Hand" fi~om Payvand Cultural School, which is an Iranian-American cultural organization. They presented a poster to Council and displayed a rug that the students had made, to be sent to New York in memory of the Septe,~iber 11 tragedy. Nejat mentioned that the group would be having 2 fundraisers, January 27 and March 17, 2002. Annual Report of the Cupertino Housing Committee. Julia Abdnla, Chair of the Housing Committee, presented the report. She reviewed a handout, which listed the projects that the con~mittee worked on this year in addition to anticipated projects for the upcoming calendar year. POSTPONEMi~,NTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A thank you letter from Pacific Scribes was handed out. They had received a fee waiver for use of the Quinlan Center's Social Room for their December card exchange. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Marc Auerbach showed photos of Calabazas Creek and suggested opening up a creek trail. Chun Lee of San Jose read a statement asking for a resolution condemning China's persecution of the practice of Falun Gong in China. Lowenthal referred it to staff for review. CONSENT CALENDAR James moved to approve the items 6-12 on the Consent Calendar as recommended. Chang seconded and the motion carried S-0. 6. Approval of minutes, November 28 7. Accounts Payable: November 30 and Dee¢i~ber 7, Resolution Nos. 01-251 and 01-252. 8. Payroll: December 7, Resolution No. 01-253. December 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 4 9. Approval of a resolution documenting that v~t~rans' preference shall not be Ivanted in the City of Cupertino's hiring process, Resolution No. 01-254. 10. Approval of a resolution authorizing enhanced 457 deferred compensation plans, which reflect current amendments to the Int=,,a! Revenue Code, Resolution No. 01-255. 11. Annexation: Make det~,,v/nations and appwve the reorganization of territory designated "Alcazar Avenue 01-01", property located on the south side of Alcazar Avenue between Byme Avenue and Almaden Avenue; appmxhnately 0.2088 acre, Lewizky {APN 357-14- 036), Resolution No. 01-256. 12. Improvement A/recment, Sherman Tuan and Yun Zheng, 20706 Kirwin Lane, APN 359- 23-005, Resolution No. 01-257. Vote Members of the Cit~ Council AYES: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, and Sandoval NOES: None ABSHNT: None ABSTAIN: None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) 13. Approving conlract change order No. 1, Safe Routes to Schools Project No. 9541, Resolution No. 01-258. L0wenthal spoke briefly about the necessity for this project. Kwok moved to adopt Resolution No. 01-258. James seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 14. Recommendation from Cupertino Telecommunications Commission to award a $10,000 educational grant to a Cupertino High School video production class. Public Info~,~,ation Officer Rick Kitson reviewed the staffreport. He introduced 2 instructors from the school, Library Technology Instructor Laura Dominguez-Yon and Television and Video Production Instructor Bill Boggle. Dominguez-Yon spoke about the project the class produced. Sandoval moved to award the educational grant. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None _ PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None December 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 5 NEW BUSINESS 15. Ordering abatement of public nuisance (city-wide weed abatvment) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 01-239, Resolution No. 01-259. City Clerk Kimberly Smith reviewed the Staff report. Gwan-Ling Deng, 7855 Festival Drive, said that he received notice about weeds in his yard and said that the notice wasn't clear about what needed to be cleaned up. He asked that future notification be more specific. Smith said that she would have the Fire Marshal's Office contact Mr. Deng directly with more specific instructions about which portion of his property is still a probl¢i~i. Chang moved to adopt Resolution No. 01-259. James seconded and the motion carried 5- 0. 16. Review of Parks and Recreation Commission and Teen Commission recommendations for Sports Center programming. Parks and Recreation Director Therese Ambrosi Smith introduced the consulting team, Lauren Livingston and Mark Schatz in addition to staff members Don McCarthy and Rich Gonzales. Smith gave some background regarding the Sports Center and then showed a video giving additional background. 'Schatz talked about the condition of the existing building. Livingston did a PowerPoint presentation regarding the demographic and demand analysis and discussed 3 program options. Smith talked about staff recommendations (option B of the PowerPoint presentation), which included: · 3,800 square foot fitness room · Aerobics room · Child watch room The youth amenities included: · Lounge area · Table tennis and pool tables · Climbing wall December 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 6 Smith said that only 2 tennis courts maximum would be removed, if any at all. She mentioned the results of a racquetball survey shown on pages 16-37 and 16-38 of the packet. She responded to questions from Council, which included the mention of a possible joint use agreement with the Foothill Union High School District (FUHSD) of their new field house facility at Cupertino High School for a competitive table tennis and badminton program. The following individuals spoke on this item: · Ed Hirshfield, 734 Stendhal Lane · Harry Kaplan from Palo Alto (used to be Cupertino resident) · Sherm Waldrnan, 7585 Bollinger Road · Jack Murphy, 7603 Newcastle Drive · Jim Guidotti, 22640 Ricardo Road · Amid Salari, 21551 Regnart Road Reza Mortezaci · Steven Hoffman, Varian Way · Marc Auerbach, 18860 Barnhardt Avenue · Sofia Song and Renee East · Denise East (and husband), 10635 Johnson Avenue · Jon Kessler, 10090 United Place · Tony Scarpa from Mountain View (representing 15 people that play racquetball) · Vijay Pathak, 1085 Oak Tree Drive · Leslie Bumell, Holly Oak Drive · Marcus East Their comments included the following: · Keep the center as it is but repair and replace as needed without diminishing the use of the tennis courts · Much support for racquetball Concern about "streetscape and urban form" (types of buildings, pedestrian access, etc.) · Concern about the site of the new facility · Other ideas for paying the cost of racquetball, for example keeping the membership fees low, but charging for the cost of playing · Comments on the relative costs of subsidizing tennis players ($1,000 per person) versus the library at $50 per person · Consider reducing tennis courts for space at a future time for a gym or other uses · Encourage support for diverse sports Smith commented that there would be at least 3 more community workshops on the design of the Sports Center. Dec¢i~iber 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 7' Sandoval's comments included: · Council should not just talk about the capital cost to build a facility but also what the long-term use would be · She was interested in the FUHSD joint use agreement for the Cupertino High School facility Chang's comments included: · This is still a work in progress and there needs to be a better sense of how the different parts fit in · He thought the joint use with the FUHSD was an interesting alternative for a table tennis facility and would like to see a dra~ of the agreement · He suggested a study session to look at the different components, the vision for the Sports Center, and how it fits in with other groups, like the YMCA Kwok's comments included: · Having a sports center which included racquetball, tennis, fitness, table tennis and badminton so that everybody from all ages could benefit from its use · Interest in a workshop with Parks and Recreation and Teen Commission · Question regarding the membership breakdown Smith responded that 45% of Cupertino residents and 55% of non-residents are currently members and that there is no difference in thc fec currently, but that in the pro forma there would be a resident discount. Kwok's comments continued: · Need to look at return investment and decide whether this is a business venture or a service to thc community · Discuss location and possible mixed usc · Concern about the down-turn in thc economy · Interested in a workshop before hc could make a decision · Look at what thc YMCA is offering James' comments included: · Due to ADA compliance and legal issues, time is a concern · It is the City's business to provide services for the community · Non-residents should pay more for a membership than residents · Liked thc Teen Commission idea of lighting additional courts to offset the possibility of having fewer courts · Wanted to move forward with the joint use agreement with FUHSD · Liked the idea of a climbing wall · Liked the ideas from the Teen Commission and ways to encourage usage from young people without having a formal teen center December 17, 2001 Cupertino City Council Page 8 Lowcnthal's cormncnts included: · Council needs to spend time with the input and come up with a plan · Put the mixed use item on the agenda for discussion Council concurred to hold a study session on January 25, 2002 from 9-2 at Blackben'y Farm, 21975 San Fernando Avenue. ORDINANCES - None STAFF REPORTS 17. Revenue and expenditure status report. Director of Admirdstrative Services Carol Atwood reviewed the staff~¢port. COUNCIL REPORTS James mentioned the annual Rotary Club children's shopping excursion, a senior luncheon, in which the Cupe~_ino Middle School choir sang and the Rotary Club donated $500 to the school's music program, and bell ringing in front of Target for thc Cupertino Community Services charity drive. Kwok mentioned that the Leadership Cupertino committee was scheduled to meet in January, and that thc Asian Community would bc sponsoring a luncheon for the seniors and low-income residents of Cupertino the following day at the Quip_lan Community Center. Chang commended the staff for the holiday luncheon. He also commended staff, Council and the community for working together on the wording for the utility user tax extension. Sandoval she enjoyed thc employees' holiday luncheon and thanked the organizers, and that she had attended the Valley Transportation Authority (VI'A) Political Action Committee last week and they discussed noise mitigation on highway 85. Lowenthal said he attended an award ceremony at Cupertino High School for two teachers in the Phoenix Program who had won the Disney Award for excellence in teaching. CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT At 10:00 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. o2-ool A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 14, 2001 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certifi~! to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of fund~ for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: < '- · DireCtor of Adm'mistrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7~:h dayof ,Ianuary , 2001, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 13/14/01 CZTY OF CUPERTZ~O PAGE 1 ~"CO~i'ING P~RI'OD: 6/02 CH~CK ~EGIS'Z~R - DZSBURS~I~I' ~ ~0~0 583866 V 02/~6/0~ ~00~ ~ZS ~Z~Z~S ~6SOT ~Z00000 ~ ~R B~ ~ZC ~Z~ 0.00 ~020 583062 V 02/~3/0~ 857 ~ 3~S ~0Z000 ~Z~ 0.00 · ~020 583678 V 03/23/0Z ~00~ ~;, LZ~ Z~0 ~ D~P ~Z~ F~E 0.00 -200.93 ~020 5840~9 V 04/0E/0Z ~00Z ~Z8, ~ 560 ~C ~ 0.00 Z0;0 584082 V 04/06/0~ ~00Z T~, SU~ 580 ~C ~ 0.00 -72.00 Z020 589803 ~2/~4/0~ Z695 3M 2708405 3983 36~ X 50 VZ~ 0.00 238Z.~ Z020 589804 ~2/~4/0~ 4 A T · T Z~08S0~ ~V200~ S~VZ~ 0.00 Z4.43 Z020 589804 ~2/~4/0~ 4 A T & T ~0850Z ~-~00~ S~VZ~ 0.00 28.86 Z020 589804 ~2/~4/0~ 4 A T & T Z~0850~ ~V ;00Z S~VZ~ 0.00 ~4.43 Z020 589804 ~/~4/0~ 4 A T & T ~0850~ ~ 200Z S~VZCS 0.00 33.20 ~ ~ 0.00 90 · 92 1020 589805 12/14/01 2161 ~:~S~ OF ~Y ~ G 62045~0 g.~ ~ F~ DB~001 0.00 1654.17 1020 5898~6 12/14/01 2110 ~C ~ ~TI~ RgP 1108312 TI~/~Z~ 0.00 50.00 1020 589~07 12/14/01 13 ~ & SONS S~ZTATZON C 5606640 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C O.00 ? 0 10;0 5~980~ 12/14/01 2539 A~ ~A~ & ~ SO~Z 1102101 ~ ~10~ ~ 10/20 0.00 1020 589809 12/14/01 18 ~NA O1~ ~R~TZON 210961; ~ 1780 S~ D~ZN 0.00 1020 589810 12/14/01 26 AZ~ ;ZL~ ~O~ ZNC 1108502 P~TS/S~PLZgS 0.00 250.00 10~0 589810 12/14/01 26 AZR FZL~ ~OL ZNC 1108504 P~/~P~XKS 0.00 500.00 1020 589810 12/14/01 26 AZR FZL~ ~OL Z~ 1108501 P~TS/S~PLI~ 0.00 500.00 1020 589810 12/14/01 26 AIR FZL~ ~L I~C 5708510 P~TS/S~PLZ~ 0.00 478.19 1020 589810 12/14/01 26 AIR FZL~ ~OL l~ 1108507 P~TS/SUP~IES 0.00 250.00 ~ ~ 0.00 1978.19 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AI~ 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 100.00 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AZ~ 1108303 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 100.00 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AZR~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 100.00 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AZR~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 36.12 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 ~ 1108303 ~ 2001-2002 OPEN ~C 0.00 100.00 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AZR~ 1108503 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 100.00 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AIR~ 1108314 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 93.44 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AZR~ 1108314 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 40.39 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AZ~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 ~00.00 1020 589811 12/14/01 28 AIR~ 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 100.00 ~ ~ 0.00 869.95 1020' 589812 12/14/01 2276 ~ 11045~0 ~P~ MAWR 0.00 366. 1020 589812 12/14/01 22V6 ~ 1104510 ~P~YEB ~ 0.00 238.26 ~ ~ 0.00 604.92 R~,-~ DAT~ 12/14/01 T'rMg 11:55:32 - FZNANCIA~, ~'rNG 1'~/14/Ol cz~/ o~' c~t~z~z~o PAGE 2 I~'0t,~HNG PgRZOD: 6/02 ~ ~zS~ - Dz~ ~E~ION ~I'~IA: ~ransac~.~rans_~e ~ween "~2/~0/200~" and -~/~4/~oo~- ~020 589813 ~2/14/01 1611 ~A*S DE~I ~ZNG 1104510 P~. ~IN S~ 0,00 81.00 1020 589814 12/14/01 44 ~1~ ~D ~S 1106448 FI~ A~D ~A~I~ ~g 0.00' 300.00 10~0 589815 12/14/01 5~ ~E 1104510 ~P~ ~FFBE 0.00 656.11 1020 559~16 12/14/01 1032 A~ DI~ I~C 6308840 .~PPLZg8 ~15019 0.00 165.~3 1020 ~9~16 12/14/01 1032 ~ DZ~ INC 630~840 SUPPLZES ~24427 0.00 51.89 ~ ~C~ 0.00 217.02 1020 589~17 12/14/01 2460 B~, ~ 1104300 PIE~I~ 12/5-12/7 0.00 138.00 1020 5~981~ 12/14/01 1475 B~'8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1105302 ~I~/~ 0.O0 950.00 1020 5~9~19 12/14/01 ~002 BZ~IP PRODU~S, INC. 5806649 ~U~TIO~ ~1~ 0.00 ~8.14 1020 5~9820 12/14/01 96 B~C~ ~AIN S~Z~ ~A 5606680 SUPPLIES 0.00 40. 1020 589821 12/14/01 1704 ~1~ 5806449' F~ INS~ ~R 2002 0.00 200.00 1020 589822 12/14/01 H ~, ~ 580 Re[~d: ~eck - F~. 0.00 16.00 1020 589~23 12/14/01 ~002 BUZ~I~ P~ITS ~ B~ 110~503 ~11500752 589824 12/14/01 ~ B~ZgL, ~VZD 580 Re~u~: ~egk- ~I~SR 0.00 40.00 1020 5~982S 12/14/01 1101 C.H, B~ ~. 1108501 P~TS/S~IES 0.00 V6.62 1020 589~36 12/14/01 12~ ~ ~I~IA ~L 1103500 ~Z~ DEC20Ol 0.00 221.95 1020 589827 12/14/01 132 ~ ~A~ S~VIC~ 1108314 sg~I~ N~ 2001 o. oo 298.03 1020 589827 12/14/01 132 ~Z~ZA WA~ SERVI~ 1108314 S~VZ~ ~ 2001 0.00 -2~3.82 1020 589827 12/14/01 132 ~I~IA HA~ S~VZ~ 1108407 S~VZ~ ~OV 2001 0.00 24~7.46 1020 589827 12/14/01 132 ~I~IA MA~ S~VZ~ 1108407 S~VZ~ ~ 2001 0.00 -5~.46 1020 589827 12/14/01 132 ~I~IA HAT~ S~VI~ 1108508 S~VI~ N~ 2001 0.00 74.51 ~ ~CK 0.00 2557.72 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~H 1104000 ,~-~'f ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 10.00 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~ 1108601 P~-r~ ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 34.00 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~H 1104000 PB~ ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 35.00 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~H 1104400 ~*~ ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 23.97 1020 58982~ 12/14/01 149 ~ 1104510 P~-~'f ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 43.V5 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~H 1104510 b~'z ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 3.18 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~H 1101200 P~ ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 25.45 1020 589828 12/14/01 149 ~H 1100000 ~ ~H 12/2-12/12 0.00 -0.05 ~ ~CK 0.00 175.30 1020 589829 12~14/01 150 ~S P~I~ & ~Z~I 4209530 ~OF S~V 9/1-9/30 0.00 1089.45 1020 589830 12/14/01 1820 ~RZDI~ B~FZT8 S~V/C 1104510 1020 589830 12/14/01 1820 ~ID~ ~FZTS ~VIC 110 DATE 12/14/01 TI[IR 11:55:33 - F'r~CZA,I, ACCOU~I'ZI,~G 12/14/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 A~ING pERIOD: G/02 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: trans&c~.t~ane_date between "12/10/2001" and "12/14/2001" F~ - 110 - GI~ FU~D CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTZCH~ ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL C~CK 0.00 50.00 1020 589831 12/14/01 M CHZJtNG, YU-HWA 580 Refund: Check o FALL. 0.00' 30.00 1020 589832 12/14/01 160 CHIT,~REN'S ART ST~ZO 5806349 SERVICE A~EMENT FOR 0.00 1515.34 1020 589833 12/14/01 N CHIMOVITS, YAFIT 580 'Refund: Check- WINTER 0.00 59.00 1020 589834 12/14/01 M CHO, ~ 580 Refund; Check - WINTER 0.00 80.00 1020 589835 12/14/01 M CHOX, SSUNG 580 Refund.* Check - FALL. 0.00 16.00 1020 889836 12/14/01 2258 CLARE PRECISION SHEET NE 2708405 TIME/MATERIALS 0.00 810.00 1020 889837 12/14/01 175 COCA-COLA USA 5606620 FOIAVTAZN MACHINE 0.00 21.60 1020 589838 12/14/01 183 COTTON SHIP, SS & ARSO IN 1108101 PROP $ERV OCT2001 0.00 2231.?E 1020 589839 12/14/01 1194 COURTESY TOW 6308840 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PI~C 0.00 65.00 1020 585840 12/14/01 187 MARY J C~AWFORD 5806349 S];RVXCE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 ?55.42 1020 589841 12/14/01 194 COPERTINO SUPPLy XNC 1108408 P~RTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 0E 1020 589841 12/14/01 194 CI/PERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108402 P~/~TS/SUPPLZES 0.00 .60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 172.85 1020 589642 12/14/01 196 C~JPERTINO TOW 6309840 CITY %~HICLE TONING 0.00 80.00 1020 589843 12/14/01 M Chan, Ruth (Shuk Yee) 550 Refund: Check - Cancel 0.00 20.00 1020 589844 12/14/01 201 DAPPER TIRE CO 6308840 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 221.68 1020 589845 12/14/01 222 DES ~,~SO~IATES 2709440 CONSLT SERV WOLFE BIKE 0.00 1234.47 1020 589846 12/14/01 223 DON & MIRE'S SWEEPING IN 2308004 FY 2001-2002 OPEN P~C 0.00 14184.75 1020 589847 12/14/01 225 DONE RIGHT ROOFING & GUT 1108502 TXME/MATERIA~ 0.00 1253.75 1020 589848 12/14/01 228 DUBAy'E TIRE SERVICE ZNC 6308840 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 75.00 1020 589848 12/14/01 228 DUBAY*S TIRE SERVICE INC 6308840 FY 2001-2002 OPEN ;qJRC 0.00 2709.82 ~TAL CHECK 0.00 2784.82 1020 589849 12/14/01 235 EDWARD B WARD CO 1108504 SUPPLIES #15049 0.00 135.72 1020 589850 12/14/01 1434 EDMAED S. WALSH CO. 1108314 P~RTS/SUPPT.ZES 0.00 12.55 1020 5#9850 12/14/01 1434 EDWARD $. WALSH CO. 1108314 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 437.02 1020 S89850 12/14/01 1434 EDWARD S. WALSH CO. 1108314 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 77.75 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 527.32 1020 589851 12/14/01 ~q F~DO, ZILDA 580 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 P" 00 RUN DATE 12/14/01 TI~: 11~55:33 - FIHANCIAL A~ING 12/~4/Ol crr,~ oF c'~?ilm PAGE 4 ACC(X,]~II~ P~RIOD: 6/02 ~ ~Is~ - D~Sa~ ~ $~I~ ~l-izklt: tra~ac:.~r~s~te ~t~en "12/10/2001" al '12/14/2001' 1020 589852 12/14/01 250 ~T ~OF ~T 5806~49 SERVI~ ~ ~R 0.00 3248.67 1020 589853 12/14/01 1949 ~ S~VI~S 520800~ ~ 11/01-11/14 0.00' 1020 589~53 12/14/01 1949 ~ S~VI~ 1108503 ~ 11/01-11/30 0.00 162.00 1020 589854 12/14/01 2~0 FBD~ ~ ~ 1104510 ~I~ S~VI~ 0.00 31.~ ~020 589855 12/14/01 2558 FS~ FI~T ~TAI~ 5~06349 ~ ~ 12/14/01 0. O0 400.00 ~020 589~56 12/14/01 2361 FI~~ 5806249 S~ 1~/~9/01 0.00 167.05 1020 589856 12/14/01 2361 FZ~K~ 5806349 S~ 11/19/01 0.00 1405.08 1020 589~56 12/14/01 2361 FZ~K~ 1106647 S~ 11/19/01 0.00 422.62 1020 5~9856 12/14/01 2361 FI~T ~ 1106343 ~ 11/19/01 0.00 632.86 1020 5~9~56 12/14/01 2361 FI~T ~ 1106265 ~ 11/19/01 0.00 33.98 ~ ~ 0.00 2661.59 1020 589857 12/14/01 273 ~ ~Z~ H.S. DI~. 5806449 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 1870.81 1020 58985~ 12/14/01 281 ~ 1108312 P~/~PLIES ~15039 0.O0 336.42 1020 589858 12/14/01 281 ~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 169.54 1020 5~9858 12/14/01 281 ~ 1108303 P~TS/~P~I~ ~22463 0.00 26,90 1020 589858 12/14/01 281 ~ 6308~40 ~ 2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 73,19 ~ 589858 12/14/01 2~1 ~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 419.52 589858 12/14/01 281 ~ 1108321 P~TS/~PLI~ ~15024 0.00 291.49 1020 5898~8 12/14/01 281 ~ 5606640 P~TS/~IES ~15712 0.00 163.29 1020 5898~8 12/14/01 281 ~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 28.66 ~ ~B~ 0.00 1509.01 1020 589859 12/14/01 204~ ~ FZ~ OFF~C 1104000 ~ ~ ~ 0.00 415.00 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~l~ ~NC 110~503 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 96.39 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~l~ ZNC 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 150.60 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~Z~ ~NC S708510 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 289.00 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~Z~ ZNC 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.0D 96.39 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~I~ /NC 1100501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.0O 227.25 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~I~ ZNC 1108505 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 96.39 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~l~ I~C 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~I~ Z~C 630~840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 239.96 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~ XNC 110~504 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 96.39 1020 589860 Z2/14/01 298 ~ ZNC 5708510 ~2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 47.69 1020 589860 12/14/01 298 ~Z~ Z~ 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 100.70 ~ ~ECX 0.00 1503.57 1020 589861 12/14/01 1364 ~IFFZN PAI~Z~ ZNC 1108502 TZ~/~Z~ 0.00 914.00 20~0 589862 12/14/01 1544 ~ PA~ 6204800 HP ~ ~T ~R P 0.00 693.98 1020 589862 12/14/01 1544 ~ PAC~ 1104400 HP ~~R P 0.00 379.00 ~.~ECX 0.00 1072.98 102~ 589863 12/14/01 1228 ~ZZg HO~ZN 5806249 S~VI~ ~ ~ 0.00 4811.89 R~ ~TE 12/14/01 TI~ 11:55:34 12/14/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5 J~'COUI~ZNG PERIOD: 6/02 CH~CK REGIS~'~. - DISBURSBI~TI' ~ ~=~Y.~I(~' ~I~: transact.tra~_~te ~t~en -~2/10/2001" ~ "12/14/2001" ~ - 110 - G~ ~ ~H ~ ~ NO IS~ ~ .............. ~R ............. ~/DB~ ..... DSS~I~ION ...... S~S T~ ~ 1020 589864 12/14/01 334 H~ DB~/G~ 1108315 S~PLZ~ 915486 0.00 102.73 1020 S89864 12/14/01 334 H~ DE~/GECF 1108601 ~PL~ES %21820 0.00 ' 13.78 1020 S89864 12/14/01 3~4 H~ DE~/GE~ 1108407 S~PLI~ ~1S009 0.00 214.~4 1020 589864 12/14/01 ~34 H~ DE~/GE~ ~108~02 SUPPLES ~1~016 0.00 130.43 1020 589864 12/14/01 334 ~ DE~/GE~ 1108303 ~PPLI~ ~24402 0.00 40.34 1020 589864 12/14/01 334 H~ DE~/GECF 1108314 ~P~IES ~22466 0.00 48.91 1020 589864 12/14/01 334 ~ ~/GB~ 1108407 S~PLIES 822427 0.00 11.74 1020 589864 ~2/~4/0~ 334 H~ DE~/GECF 1108501 ~P~I~ ~15619 0.00 9.46 1020 589864 12/14/01 334 H~ DE~/~ 1108506 S~PL~ ~=S277 0.00 190.S0 1020 589864 ~2/~4/0~ 334 H~ DE~/GECF 110~503 ~PPLIES 915617 0.00 32.80 1020 589864 ~2/~4/0~ 334 ~ DE~/~ 5606620 S~PLIES ~15710 0.00 191.88 ~ ~ 0.00 987.11 1020 589865 12/14/01 2553 ~SS~ BR~., INC. 1108505 TI~/~RI~ 0.00 342.9o 1020 589866 12/14/Ol 341 I~ ~ 5806449 S~VI~ ~ ~R 0.00 2546.00 1020 589867 12/14/01 2299 I~I~ ~ a ~ 1108201 ~S ~S~AT1~ 0.00 360.00 1020 589868 ~2/14/01 2392 ~ S~b-~-~ ~ S~ 1108501 ~DEL FI~ DE~ S 0.00 2361.74 1020 589868 22/24/02 2392 Ih-~-~OR SYS~ ~ SER 1109215 ~DgL F2~ DE~ S 0.00 222~2.26 ~ ~CK 0.00 14 F 0 1020 589869 12/14/01 1981 I~TA~ ~FIC ~ 1108314 P~TS/S~PLIES ~15029 0.00 338.04 1020 589870 12/14/01 1009 ~.A. S~ I~ 1108501 P~TS/SUPPLI~ 0.00 346.27 1020 589871 12/14/01 M JAIN, ~ S80 Refund= ~eck - WI~ER 0.00 135.00 1020 589872 12/14/01 1969 ~IL ~S~ 2204022 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ P~C 0.00 375.00 1020 589873 12/14/01 ~2002 J~S~, ~ 1104300 ~I~ 12/5-12/7/01 0.00 138.00 1020 589874 22/24/o2 M ~lS~, ~ 580 Ref~d; ~eck - F~. 0.00 21.00 1020 589875 22/24/o2 1630 KIDZ ~ S~ ~ 5806449 SERVI~ ~ ~R 0.00 4384.80 1020 589876 12/14/01 M KlM, ~ 580 Refun~ 222222/222222 0.00 90.00 1020 589877 12/14/01 2355 K1~-HO~ ~ ~S~IAT 4209534 ~LIC W0R~ ~ 0.00 18531.28 1020 589878 22/24/02 2~2 L2~ Xl~ 5806449 S~VI~ ~ ~R 0.00 28.00 1020 589879 22/~4/o~ 3~3 KIRK XP~ 1104310 ~ 2002-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 407.72 2020 S89880 ~2/24/02 2302 ~2 INC. 1~08101 SERVICE ~ ~R 0.00 222.88 2020 589880 22/24/02 2302 ~3 2NC. 2208202 SnVI~ ~ ~ 0.00 2985.S0 ~ ~CX 0.00 3308.38 1020 589881 12/14/01 400 LIF~I~ ~IS 1NC 5706450 S~V1~ A~ ~R 0.00 228: RIAq DATE 12/14/Ol TIM 11:55:34 - FINANCIAL ACCOL~I'ING 12/14/01 CT~ OF CUP~'r~o PAGE ~t. Cl~iJ~II~ PERIOD: $/02 ~ ~I~-r~ = DI~ S~I~ ~I~: tra~act.t=ans~te ~en '12/lo/2oo2" and ~ - 110 - G~ ~ ~H ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ .............. ~E ............. 1020 589882 12/14/01 2514 L, OS~Z~TOSC*d~RB~GS 1106265 NOV2001 S~ 0.00 4.84 1020 589883 12/14/01 M I,~U'D~ZG, N~RCZA 580 Refund: Check - WZNTER 0.00 40.00 1020 589884 12/14/01 2356 Llq~XTEC'~OL. OGZES 6109853 GIS CONV& IMPLB~/qT 0.00 5000.00 1020 589809 12/14/01 1968 ~ ,R~t,~) ASSOCZATgS 1104000 FIN, R, IqCZ~.T., AUDIT SBRVIC 0.00 2442.30 1020 569885 12/14/01 1968 N~,BAI~ASSOCZAT~S 1104000 GASB 34 PH~.SK III 0.00 950.00 TOI'AI~ CH~CK 0.00 3392.30 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NCI NORI,DC0~4 1103500 ¥1326426 NOV 2001 C/*JRG 0.00 8.82 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NCI ~OR,TaDCOt4 1104400 Y1326426 ~ 2001 C~IRG 0.00 1.90 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NCI ~ 1104100 Y1326426 ~OV 2001 CHRG 0.00 13.08 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NCZ ~ORUX,"Ot4 5606620 ¥1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 3.14 1020 589888 12/14/01 1292 MC/ NOR,~DC0~4 1104300 Y1326426 I~OV 2001 C'I~G 0.00 7.95 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NCI t~)RIaDCON 1103300 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 2.99 1020 589586 12/14/01 1292 NCI h~ORI, DCON 1104000 ¥1325426 NOV 2001 C~.~G 0.00 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 HC! IJOR,T.~"0(~ 1108602 Y1326426 )~OV 2001 C~J]tG 0.00 ?.91 1020 589606 12/14/01 1292 NCZ NOB,7,.~DCON 1108501 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 18.28 1020 589808 12/14/01 1292 NC! ~0~ 1108001 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 24.58 1020 509886 12/14/01 1292 NC! NOR.T.2~N 5?06450 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 11.11 1020 509886 12/14/01 1292 NC! MOR,I,DCO~ 1104530 Y1326426 ~ 2001 (:~RG 0,00 14.58 589886 12/14/01 1292 NC! NOP,12~"OI4 1104510 Y1326426 NOV 2001 C'HRG 0,00 8.33 589885 12/14/01 1292 NC! NOP..L,DCON 1106100 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 1.57 1020 559886 12/14/01 1292 14CZ ~ORI2)CON 1108503 Y1326426 NOV 2001 (~RG 0.00 35.38 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NC! tlOR.M:~:~4 1307301 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0,00 20.49 1020 589856 12/14/01 1292 NCZ NOltT.,DCO~4 1106265 ¥1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0,00 29.49 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 14C! NOR/,DCOJ~ 1101500 ¥1326426 NOV 2001 C~RG 0.00 5.95 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 HC! ]~:],RI,DCOI4 1106500 ¥1326426 IJOV 2001 C~4RG 0.00 15.18 1020 589886 12/14/01 1292 NCZ ~ 1107501 Y1326426 NOV 2001 CHRG 0.00 14.13 1020 509886 12/14/01 1292 NC! ~ORMX::ON 1101200 Y1325426 NOV' 2001 CHRG 0.00 4.57 TOT~T.~CH~CK 0.00 25?.06 1020 50958? 12/14/01 2554 NC~Ut. ST~R-C,R, RR 1108501 P~,R?S/STJPP~IF.S 0.00 ?4.69 1020 589090 12/14/01 1868 NETRO NOBII~E COt~4~qlC~?! 1108501 PAR?S/SUPPIaIES 0.00 1244.16 1020 589889 12/14/01 439 HZCI~R, EI,S #13333 5806349 SUppr~IES #23204 0.00 50.53 1020 589890 12/14/01 2301 NICH/~,SI,S #8698 5806349 SUPP~ZIS #23300 0.00 51.32 1020 559890 12/14/01 2301 NZ~ #8698 5806349 SUPPLZBS ~23203 0.00 50.60 TOTAI~ CHSCK 0.00 101.92 1020 589891 12/14/01 940 NI~PIT~S NO~SRS INC 6308840 P~,RTS #15030' 0.00 74.?3 1020 589092 12/14/01 2157 b~qAKON~NATO 5806349 $BRVZCBAGR,E~4~%'T FOR 0.00 546.39 1020 589893 12/14/01 444 NZIfT0~mS M,~ER 1108501 P,MtT$/SUPPI,IES #23602 0.00 11.83 102~ 589894 12/14/01 46? NISSI0~'*L~flFORNSgRyZCE 1108201 ~DAT& ~RROR 0.00 -12.48 DATE 12/14/01 TI~ 11~55~35 - FINANCIAl,, ACCO~"I'ING 12/14/01 CTTY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACC0r~ITING PERIOD: 6/02 CHECK RSGTSTER - DISBTJRSENBNT FUND S~I~CTION CRI-~-~RI&: transact~.t:rarm_date between "12/10/2001# and '12/14/2001" FtmD- 110 - GB~. FUN~ CASH ACCT C~I~CK NO ISSU~ DT .............. V~NDOR ............. P't,~qD/DEPT ..... D~SCRIPI'ION ...... S~T.~S TAX AHOUNT 1020 589894 12/14/01 447 HTSST(:~q L~IIFOSM SERVIru 1108201 FY 2001-2002 OP~ PURC 0.00 100.03 1020 589094 12/14/01 447 MISSION UNIFORM SRRVTCX 1108201 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 84.16 1020 589894 12/14/01 447 HTSSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00' 84.16 TOTAL CHECK 0,00 256.47 1020 589895 12/14/01 455 HRATLIER MOT*T* 5806249 SERVICE AGRESM~/TI' FOR 0.00 648.00 1020 589895 12/14/01 455 HEATHER MOLl, 5808249 .' SERVTCK AGREKNKHT FOR 0.00 1236.00 TOTAL CH~CK 0.00 1884.00 1020 589896 12/14/01 465 MP& DI~STUN 4209119 SERVICE AGR~SME/TI' FOR 0.00 S858.00 1020 5f~9897 12/14/01 475 LqATIOHAT~ CONSTRUCTIUN RE 1108312 RENTAL 11/14-12/11 0.00 41,65 1020 559890 12/14/01 2197 LqA?~rOHA~ T~CI~OLOGY /qIAN 1108201 TRAZN/~G CT~ASS 0.00 1095.00 1020 589899 12/14/01 1550 ADONTS Y- ENCESTTO 1103500 SSRVICE AGIU~EMEIT~ FOR 0.00 532.50 1020 589900 12/14/01 407 NORTHAIRE SUPPT.¥ CO 1108505 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 211.19 1020 589901 12/14/01 489 NO/~WORTHY MUSIC SCHOOT. 5806349 SERVICE A~RF~NEITI' FOR 0.00 3273.04 1020 589902 12/14/01 491 IJL~R8 MANUF&CTURTNG 6308840 PARTS/SUPP~TES #24428 0.00 21.88 1020 589903 12/14/01 1970 BARBARA l~T~llq~S 2204011 FY 2001-2002 OPER PURC 0.00 JO 1020 589904 12/14/01 498 O'GRAD¥ PAVING TNC 2709435 ROAD BUNP ON EAST SS?& 0.00 0400.00 1020 589905 12/14/01 503 ORCHARD SUPP~,¥ 5806640 ONTTME DISCOUNT 0.00 -5.35 1020 589905 . 12/14/01 503 ORCHARD SUPPLY 5608640 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 220.23 TOTAL CHSCK 0.00 214.85 1020 589906 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUppT~¥ HAREMARE 1108503 SUPPLTS$ 0.00 24.25 1020 509906 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUPpY.¥ HAR/~JAJ~E 1108505 SUPPT*IES 0.00 40.71 1020 589908 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUPPIa¥ HARDMARE 1108501 SUPPT.I~S 0.00 39.24 1020 589906 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDMARB 1108503 ONTI~ DTSCOiAT~ 0.00 -0.97 1020 589908 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUPPly ~ 1108502 SUPPI, ISS 0.00 24.27 1020 509908 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUPPF-y ~ 1108501 RETURN SUPPI, TIGS 0.00 -19.43 1020 509908 12/14/01 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDMAR~ 1108503 SUPP~.ZBS 0.00 182.19 TOTAL (~I~CK 0.00 290.25 1020 589907 12/14/01 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDlfARE 2700405 SUPPLIES #15408 0.00 237.70 1020 589907 12/14/Ol 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDMARB 1100321 SUPPLTSS #15483 0.00 207.30 1020 589907 12/14/01 981 OROIARD SUPPLy HARDNARE 1108315 SUPPLIES #15485 0.00 310.54 1020 589907 12/14/ol 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDiVARE 1108312 SUPPI, ISS #15027 0,00 108.96 1020 589907 12/14/Ol 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARUNARE 2708405 SUPPLIES #15014 0.00 180o94 1020 589907 12/14/01 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDffAR.B 5708510 SUPPLIES #15071 0.00 23.00 102.0 589907 ~.2/14/Ol 981 OROOLqD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108407 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 45.34 1020 589907 12/14/Ol 981 ORCHA.qD SUPPLY HARDMARI~ 1108314 SUPPLI'SS #15481 0.00 378.84 1020 589907 12/14/01 901 ORCJ&~RD SUPPLY HARDWARB 1100321 SUPPLIER #15023 0.00 113.24 1020 589907 12/14/01 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY ~ 5706450 SUPPLIER #21750 0.00 3fl 32 1020 589907 12/14/01 981 ORCHARD SUPPT.Y HARDWARE 2708405 SUPPLISS #15005 0.00 J RUN DAT~ 12/14/01 ?T~ 11:55~36 - FINANCIAL Accor~iTING ACCO~J~TI~ PERIOD: 6/02 C~ECX m~zsl~ - DZSS~ ~ ~ ~CK 0.00 1652.37 1020 589908 12/14/01 504 ORI~ ~Z~ ~ 5806349 ~LIES ~16894 0.00' 499.69 1020 589909 12/14/01 1650 O~S ~ ~E 1108501 ~ ~ 2001 0.00 11~.63 1020' 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC~LL 1108529 .~ S~V N~200 O.00 28.66 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC B~ 1106100 ~O~ S~V~V 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~ZFZC B~.L 1104400 ~PHO~ S~V N~ 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC B~ 1104530 ~O~ SERV ~ 200 0.00 2'00.64 1020 589912 1~/14/01 511 P~ZFIC B~J. 1106647 ~PH~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 28.66 1020 589912 12/14/01 511' P~IFIC BB~ 1108501 11/13-12/12 0.00 324.00 1020 509912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC ~ 5606640 ~ SERV N~ 200 0.00 196.50 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC ~Lb ~708510 ~ SERV~ 200 0.00 229.31 1020 589912 12/14~01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1108265 ~ S~V~V 200 0.00 200.64 1020 509912 12~14/01 511 PP~IFIC BELL 1104510 ~ S~V ~V 200 0.00 171.98 1020 58991~ 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1104200 ~ SERV N~ 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC Bg~ 5606620 ~0~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 286.63 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFZC~ 110~507 ~ S~V N~ 200 0.00 109.35 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC BE~ 1108503 ~ S~V N~ 2O0 0.00 814,92 1020 S69912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC B~ 1104100 ~ SERVe200 0.00 171.98 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC B~ 1104000 ~LEPH~ SSRV N~ 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BB~ 1103500 ~ SERV N~ 200 0.00 85,99 : 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC B~ 1103300 ~0~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 5~.33 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC BE~ 1104300 ~LEPH~ S~V N~ 200 0.00 258.85 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFZC B~LL 1101500 ~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 315.30 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1102100 ~O~ SERV N~ 200 0.00 143,32 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC B~ 1107301 TB~NE S~V N~ 200 0.00 57.33 1020 589912 1=/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1101000 ~ SERV ~ 200 0.00 171.98 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC ~LL 1108~04 ~PH~ SERV ~ 200 0.00 114.65 1020 589912 12/14/01 Sll PACIFIC BE~ 1108511 ~.~S~V~V 200 0.00 57.33 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC B~ 1108602 ~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 114.65 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1108601 ~ SERV~ 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC ~ 5706450 ~PH~ S~V N~ 200 0.00 343.96 1020 5~9912 12[14/01 511 PACIFIC BB~ 1101200 ~PH~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~ZFIC BE~ 1106265 TE~O~ SERV ~ 200 0.00 458.61 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PP~IFIC BE~ 1108101 ~ S~V ~V 200 0.00 272.74 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC ~ 1108001 ~ S~V N~ 200 0.00 14].]2 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC B~ 1107503 ~ SERV NOV 200 0.00 114.65 1020 5~9912 12/14/01 511 P~CZFIC.B~ 6104800 11/26-12/25 0.~0 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1106265 ~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 85.99 1020 5~9912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC B~ 1107502 ~O~ S~V~V 200 0.00 28.66 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1106647 ~O~ S~V NOV 200 0.00 257.9~ 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC ~ 1105201 ~LEPg~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 368.~8 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFIC BELL 1108508 ~hEPH~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 57.86 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BS~ 110~509 ~O~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 62.02 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC B~ 6104800 ~ SERV ~ 200 0.00 544.60 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BS~ 5606620 T~ S~V ~V 200 0.00 302.56 1020 ~9912 12/14/01 511 P~ZFIC ~ 2308004 ~ S~V ~V 200 0.00 28.-66 1020 569912 12/14[01 511 PACIFIC B~ 5208003 ~ S~V ~ 200 0.00 2~.66 1020 589912 12/14101 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1107501 ~ S~V~V 200 0.00 3~2.62 12/14/01 TX~ 11:55:37 - FX~CI~ ACCOUNTX~ 12/14/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO PA~E 9 ACCOU~T~II~ P~RIOD: ~02 ~SCK ~IS~R - DISB~ ~ · ~.~I~ ~Z~I~ ~c~.~ans_~e ~w~en "12/10/2001~ a~ "12/14~2001" ~ - 110 - G~ ~ ~H A~ ~NO ISS~ ~ .............. V~R ............. ~/DE~ ..... DES~I~I~ ...... S~S T~ ~ 10~0 589912 12/14/01 511 P~IFZC BE~ 1107302 TE~O~ SERV ~V 200 0.00 57.33 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1108501. TE~B~ONE SERV N~ 200 0.00 759.31 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BS~ 1106265 ~E~ S~V NOV 200 0.00' 91.25 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC B~ 1107301 TE~O~ S~V NOV 200 0.00 257.97 1020 599912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1107200 TE~PH~ SERV NOV 200 0.00 85.99 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BB~ 1108102 ~0~ S~V N~ 200 0.00 2~.66 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BS~ 1106500 ~E~ SBRV ~V 200 0.00 343.96 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BB~ 1108504 TE~O~ S~V NOV 200 0.00 31.58 1020 589912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1108407 ~ONE SERV N~ 200 0.00 15.07 1020 S89912 12/14/01 511 PACIFIC BE~ 1108201 TE~O~ S~V NOV 200 0.00 82.26 · O~CK 0.00 10491.51 1020 589913 12/14/01 S20 PAPE~ INC 1106265 SUPPLIES ~16744 0.00 251.85 1020 5~9914 12/14/01 ~002 PC ~Z~ 6104800 SO~ ~ZB~Y 0.00 25.00 1020 589915 12/14/01 526 P~NS~ DZGIT~ Z~ZN 2709430 P~ ~P~ES 0.00 207.36 1020 589915 12/14/01 526 P~ZN~ DZGZT~ Z~N 110 P~ COP~ES 0.00 307.14 1020 5~9915 12/14/01 526 P~NS~ DZGIT~ I~IN 110 P~ ~PIES 0.00 40.50 1020 589915 12/14/01 526 P~INS~ DZGZT~ Z~ZN 4209528 P~ ~PZ~ 0.00 57.51 ~ ~CK 0.00 612.51 1020 589916 12/14/01 542 PI~ ~ ~ 5609105 L~ER ~ ~g ~ 0.00 F ~6 1020 589916 12/14/01 542 PI~ ~N~ L~R 5609105 ~ER ~ ~D~E ~ 0.00 1. .04 ~ ~CK 0.00 77~1.30 1020 5~9917 12/14/01 545 ~E~F PIS~R~IO 5606640 ~F ~E ~ i 0.00 1844.00 1020 ~89918 12/14/01 552 PRECISION P~PE~INE 1108401 TI~/~TSRZ~ 0.00 14~5.85 1020 589919 12/14/01 124~ ~IS P~S~ 1106100 B~ 0.00 24.25 1020 589919 1~/14/01 1249 ~ZZ ~ 4269212 SUPPLIES 0.00 167.32 ~ ~ 0.00 191.57 1020 589920 12/14/01 ~002 ~l~, ~O~ 110 ~FD G~Z~ ~ REL 0.00 3500.00 1020 589921 12/14/01 ~002 PRI~, ~O~ 110 45t BO~ REdE 0.00 2250.00 1020 559922 12/14/01 1186 ~g ~I~ 5506549 N~ ~g~ ~HP 0.00 111.24 1020 589923 12/14/01 2555 ~ ~INEERI~ 1108830 P~TS/S~P~ZES ~15001 0.00 430.00 1020 589924 12/14/01 ~002 ~U~A ~PBRTINO 1104400 D~S/L~ES 12 ~ ~.00 370.00 1020 589925 12/14/01 570 ~IO S~CK 1104400 ~PP~IES ~165~1 0.00 112.28 1020 589~26 12/14/01 2441 ~E ~EY 5806249 SERVZ~ ~ ~R 0.00 862.50 1020 589927 12/14/01 581 ~LI~E 1107503 ~PPLZBS ~12358 O.00 153.13 1020 589927 12/14/01 581 R~LZ~ 1107301 SUPPLIES ~12358 0.00 ~' q6 1020 58992~ 12/14/01 581 ~I~ 1107503 S~P~ZES ~12358 0.00 1 RU~i DAI~ 12/14/01 7I~ 11~55:37 - Fll~t,~CI~Ua ACCOUNT~ 12/14/01' CITY OF CUP~TZNO PAGE J~'~C~,,~'FXNO P~RX~: 6/02 CHEC]C P.,,~GX~I~ - DX~ ~ - 110 - ~ ~ 1020 5~992~ 12/14/01 581 ~Z~ 1107503 SUP~Z~ ~12358 0.00 51.~7 ~ ~ o.00 334.93 1020 ~89928 12/14/01 2482 ~Z ~X~ 1108101 S.~ ~/E 11/30 0.00 1276.00 1020 589928 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~Z~ 6109865 S.~ H/S 11/30 0.00 ~00.00 1020 5~9928 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~TX~ 6104800 ~.S~ N/B 12/07 0.00 1680.00 1020 589928 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~TZ~ 6104800 ~.8~ ~/B 11/16 0.00 1008.00 1020 58992~ 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~TX~ 6104800 J.S~ ~/~ 11/30 0.00 1680.00 1020 5B9928 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~TZ~ 6109865 S.~ ~/E 11/16 0.00 1750.00 1020 589928 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~S~TX~ 6104800 ~.S~ ~/E 11/23 0.00 1008.00 1020 ~89928 12/14/01 2482 ~X ~TZ~ 1108101 S.~ ~/E 12/0~ 0.00 2320.00 1020 58~930 12/14/01 601 ROY~ B~ 1NC 6308840 P~TS/S~PL~gS 0.00 122.64 1020 589931 12/14/01 2043 ~S PE~ ~ 5606620 B~ HZ~ ~ 0.00 75.00 1020 58~932 12/14/01 959 ~ ~B ~Y ~S 1106265 ~S~X~ 12/24-3/24/0 0.00 47.46 1020 589933 12/14/01 625 ~ ~E ~R ~P~ 1108312 9/27-11/03 0.00 82~.21 ~D 589933 12/14/01 625 ~ ~E ~A~ ~ 1108407 9/27-12/03 0.00 18.95 ~ ~ 0.00 842.16 1020 5~9934 12/14/01 628 ~A ~ ~ B~X 1102100 ~ ~R~ S~VZC 0.00 471375.10 1020 589935 12/14/01 1919 ~A~V;T.T.~Y ~S 5500000 18 STXC~ 12/2001 0.00 162.00 1020 589936 12/14/01 1916 ~ S~ 4239222 S~P~X~8 12/05 0.00 3~2.~5 1020 589937 12/14/01 652 SX~ S~I~ ~A~ ~. 1106265 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 68.60 1020 589938 12/14/01 1837 SZ~Z~ ~T~,~ p~VX~ ~ 1108314 P~ ~ORK AT ~ 0.00 47547.00 1020 589940 12/14/01 2~20 ~-~ X~X~ 6308840 1020 588941 12/14/01 2474 ~ S~RT8 ~~4269212 S~VI~~ ~R 0.00 9596.46 1020 589942 12/14/01 1421 ST~ ~ 1108504 TX~/~X~ 0.00 480.00 1020 5~9943 12/14/01 1011 ~A~ ~ OF ~X~T 110 ~001 S/~E T~ P~P 0.00 1046.00 1020 589944 12/14/01 1090 ~ ~OF ~X~T 1104300 ~ FE~ 0.00 ~00.00 1020 589945 12/1~/01 686 ~ ~-~ 2204010 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 750.00 1020 5~9946 12/14/01 6~9 ~Z~X~ 1104530 ~1~ ~ ~E 0.00 500.00 R~,~ DA'I~ 12/14/01 ?ZN~ 11:55:38 12/14/01 CITY OF CUP~TIHO PAGE ACCOUNTING PSRTOD: 6/02 CHECE REGISTER - DT$BURSS~4SNT FUND SELECT/ON CRITEHIA: ~ransact.=r&ne_da~e between '12/10/2001~ and ~12/14/2001w CASH ~CT C~CK NO ISS~ DT .............. %~DOR ............. PT.~D/DE~T ..... DESCrIpTION ...... SAL~S TAX 1020 589947 12/14/01 M So, Shiu C~un 550 R~fund: Chec~ - Cancel 0.00 20.00 1020 589948 12/14/01 M Sun,ar, Arena 550 Refund: Check - change 0.00 ' 750.0C 1020 589949 12/14/01 698 TALLY~S ENTERPRISES 2708403 FY 2001-2002 OpEN PURC 0.00 59259.5? 1020 509950 12/14/01 701 TARGET STORES 1106500 'SUPPLIE~ #16019 0.00 194.01 1020 509950 12/14/01 701 TARGET STO~ES 1106265 SUPPLIES #23899 0.00 25.38 1020 589950 12/14/01 701 TARGET STOR~S 5706450 SUPPLIES #23845 0.00 10. 1020 509950 12/14/01 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 SUPPLIES #22382 0.00 34.56 1020 589950 12/14/01 701 TARGET STORBS 5706450 SUPPLIES #23046 0.00 16.14 ~OTAL C~TBCK 0.00 281.67 1020 589951 12/14/01 M2002 TIlE IIw£~K~ATION~L 110 R#7262 DEV MAINT DPST 0.00 1000.00 1020 589951 12/14/01 M2002 ~ INTt~ENATIONAL 110 R#7276 ESFD ENC BOHD 0.00 500.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1500.00 1020 589952 12/14/01 1564 TEA(~IERS~ HELPER 5806349 SUPPLIES 923202 0.00 40,94 1020 589952 12/14/01 1564 TEA~' HELPER 5006349 SUPPLIES #23801 0.00 46.29 1020 589952 12/14/01 1564 TEACHERS~ H~LPER 5006349 EUpp*r. IES #23201 0.00 52,43 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 139.56 1020 589953 12/14/01 1753 THEATERFUN TNC 5806349 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 3 0 1020 589954 12/14/01 2556 TH0~ SWAN $IG~ CO. o IN 1109215 DEPOSIT 50% SINAGE 0.00 3290.00 1020 589955 12/14/01 ?09 Z, OU THURMAN 5506449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 2493.14 1020 589956 12/14/01 2396 TREAI~SIJ,, & ROLl&) 4239222 SERVICE AGREE~4ENT FOR 0.00 2409.?5 1020 589957 12/14/01 ?27 U $ POSTWASTER 1106100 #341 (A) RATE BULK 0.00 125.00 1020 589950 12/14/01 ?33 UPBEAT INC 1100505 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0,00 192.01 1020 589958 12/14/01 ?33 UPBRAT /NC 1108505 P, ETU~ OF TNV 409717 0,00 -176.00 ~TAL CHECK 0,00 16.01 1020 589959 12/14/01 2030 VAL~INO, LISA 1103500 TRAINING *r.~CK 0.00 48.11 1020 ~89960 12/14/01 742 COSETTE VIAUD 5806349 SERVICE AGREE~ FOR 0.00 1~33.34 1020 509961 12/14/01 2117 RADHA VIGNOLA 5806449 SERVICE AGREZD4ENT FOR 0.00 1550.20 1020 589962 12/14/01 ?46 ¥IKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 5506549 SUPPLIES #16018 0.00 91.94 1020 589963 12/14/01 ?66 WEST BAY ST~ REMOVAL I 1100400 16 ST~PS RZ~4OVED 11/2 0.00 560.00 1020 ~89964 12/14/01 2557 W~ST V~t,.T.~y CHARTER LINE 5006"t49 DP:PST DISNSYI~ 2002 0.00 1000.00 1020 559965 12/14/01 ??4 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2?08405 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 92?.29 1020 589966 12/14/01 1939 WINZI,ER & KELLY CONSULT/ 2?09443 PUBLIC WORI~ CONTR~ 0.00 RtH~ DATE 12/14/01 TIME 11:55:39 - FINANCIAL 12/14/ol CTI~/ OF CUPERTINO PAGE 12 ~'*COI,~IT'rI~ P~RTOD: 8/02 CIIECK R~G~STER - DTSBURSE~ENT Ft~D FUND - 110 - GENERAL ~ CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE IY~ .............. VENDOR ............. FUI~D/DEI~ ..... DESCRT~'i'ION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT'1* 1020 589968 12/14/01 793 NANCY ~u'LFF 5806249 SERVICE AGREE~X~E~i~ FOR 0.00 2251.80 1020 589969 12/14/01 794 XEROX CORPORA?IOH 1104310 FY 2001-2002 OPI~ PURC 0.00 804.63 1020 589969 12/14/01 794 XEROX CORPORAT'FON 1104310 FY 2001-2002 OPE~q L:~JRC 0.00 46~..82 TOTAL CHKCE 0.00 1266.45 1020 589970 12/14/01 1081 YAMAGAMTtS NURSERY 1108315 SUPpr.IE-q #15559 0.00 25.1.7 1020 589971 12/14/01 M YOO~, SET SEUNG 580 Refurid: Check - #I'HTER 0.00 59.00 1020 589972 12/1.4/01 802 ZEP NAHUFACTURING COMPAI~ 6308840 SUPPI, TES #15006 0.00 210.21 1020 5899'73 12/14/01 805 ~.AR~AL? ENGINEERING GROU 4209541* SERVICE AG~ FOR 0,00 3504.21 1020 585973 12/14/01 805 ZI,~AL? ~IGINEERING GROU 4209534 PRO~TECT MGM/' SVC 0.00 2437.40 1020 589973 12/14/01 805 EUJ4WAL? E~GZNRERING GROU 2709443 SERVICE AGREF. Y~.NT FOR O. 00 2924.80 1020 5899"/3 12/14/01 805 ZI]M~ALT RHG'rNEERT'I,~G GROU 2709531 PuB'r.Ic ~ORI~ CONTRACT O. 00 3480.08 1020 889973 12/14/01 805 lq,'~4ifAL? EIqGINEERING GROU 4209533 SERVICE AGREEI~d~iT FOR 0.00 1361.36 1020 589973 12/14/01 805 ZI]/~O~AI, T EF, GTHEBRIHG GROU 4209535 J~ORK PLAH COS/' PROPOSA 0.00 2204.16 889973 12/14/01 805 EIAR~AL? I~IGZNEERIHG GROU 2709448 SERVICE AGR,EEMElfl' FOR 0.00 318.00 589973 12/14/01 805 ET,~'4MAL? I~IGZaI~aI~.ING GROU 4209528 -qERV #OLFE 'I'RAFFTC SAF 0.00 2102.10 TOTAL CHKCI( 0.00 23034.55 TOTAL ~ 0.00 877498.31 TOTAL REFORT 0. O0 877498.31 Rr~I DA'I~ 12/14/01 T'rl~ 11:55;39 - F/NAHCTAL RESOLUTION NO. 02-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 21, 2001 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of January ,2001, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino z2/2o/oz CITY OF CUPERTINO PRE ~ Accom~rzzm en~oD~ 6/02 ~SC~ P. SGTSTS~ - DZ~ ~ ~ - 110 ~ ~ ~ 1020 584917 V 0~/18/01 ~001 ~, E~ 110 ~ ~SED D~ZT 0.00 -500.00 1020 584971 V 05/18/01 ~001 ~. ~ 110 ~ ~ED DE~IT 0.00' -51.25 1020 S84983 V 05/18/01 ~001 0'~ D~ 110 ~ ~ DE~IT 0.00 -454.40 1020 58~15 V 05/18/01 ~001 S~, ~-~ 110 '~ ~ DE~ZT 0.00 -640.75 1020 S85135 V 05/25/01 ~001 ~, I~ 550 S~X~ ~C RS~ 0.00 -40.00 1020 585156 V 05/25/01 ~001 ~ GI~ 1103300 ~I~ION 0.00 -12.50 ~"~ 585170 V 05/25/01 ~001 O~, ~IN F 110 ~ ~D ~ DEP 0.00 -151.48 1020 585645 V 06/15/01 ~001 ~IN, ~ 550 REF ~ ~S T 0.00 -46.00 1020 585B21 V 06/22/01 M ~IY~, ~HI 5B0 Ref~d: ~eck - S~I~ 0.00 -168.00 1020 589974 12/21/01 2445 A.Y.BI~ SUP~I~ 5506549 ~P~ A~ZC 70 0.00 7814.97 1020 589974 12/21/01 2445 A.V.BI~ ~PLI~ 5506549 ~ A~ONIC 70 0.00 2309.8~ ~ ~ 0.00 10124.84 1020 589976 12/21/01 8 ~ P~ ~RP 6204550 RP~ OF ~ 11/2 O.00 6183.79 1020 589977 12/21/01 13 ~ i S~S ~ZTATZ~ C 1108321 ~ 11/3-11/30 0.00 154.00 1020 SB9978 12/21/01 1884 ~TS~-~ DZYI 5806349 ~P~IES 923843 0.00 46.62 1020 589978 12/21/01 1884 ~T~S-NOR~ DZVZ 5806349 ~PLZ~ ~23876 0.00 44.59 1020 589978 12/21/01 1884 ~TS~S-NOR~ DZVI 5806349 S~PLI~ 923842 0.00 49.34 ~ ~ 0.00 159.31 1~' 5899~9 12/21/01 2071 ~.~ 1107302 D~/LIFE ~. CITIE 0.00 17.95 DATE 12/20/01 TZI~ 10:56:10 - PXNANCXAL 12/20/01 CTT~' OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 AC~TZNG PERIOD.* 5/02 CHECK R~GTS~*~K - DISBURS~4~HT FU/qD SgI,ECTIOH CRITERIA: trmrmact.trans_dal:e between .12/17/2001# a~d #12/21/2001' ~ - 110 ~ ~ ~ CJ~,SR ~ I~I~CK NO Z~SU~: DT .............. V~IDOR ............. ~'./ND/DEL:r'~ ..... DESCRZP'I'T(~I ...... ~*r.~ TAX AMOUNT 1020 569980 12/21/01 2330 AMKRZCAN INDUSTRIA~ S~T~P 2706405 SUPPLIES #15034 0.00 361.18 1020 589980 12/21/01 2330 AN~RICAN INDUSTRIAL S~PP 1108312 P~TS/~P~IES 0.00' 417.34 ~ ~ 0.00 778.52 1020 589981 12/21/01 ~002 ~I~ P~Z~ ~S~. 1107301 ~S C.~ ~018980 0.00 367.00 1020 589982 12/21/01 2298 ~ ~RB~SS 1106400 12/02-1/01/02 0.00 13.60 1020 589982 12/21/01 2298 ~ ~SS 1108501 12/02-1/01/02 0.00 129.64 1020 589982 12/21/01 2298 ~ HIRSUTE 6104800 12/02-1/01/02 0.00 13.80 1020 589982 12/21/01 2298 ~H~SS 1106265 12/02-1/01/02 0.00 11.80 1020 589982 12/21/01 2298 ~ ~Z~SS 110~501 12/02-1/01/02 0.00 ~.80 'z~ ~B~ 0.00 176.64 1020 589983 12/21/01 H ~, ~ZAT 580 Ref~d: ~eck - F~. 0.00 44.00 1020 589984 12/21101 61 ~TI~ZC P~ ~TIO~S 1108504 P~ ~g D~001 0.00 81.00 10~0 589984 12/21/01 61 ~TZST~C P~ ~TZ~ 1108505 ~ ~ DS~001 0.00 130.00 1020' 589984 12/21/01 61 ~TZST/C P~ ~TZ~S 1108501 P~ ~ D~C2001 0.00 214.00 1020 589984 12/21/01 61 ~TZ~ZC P~ ~T/~S 1108503 P~ ~S DEC2001 0.00 65.00 ~ ~CK 0.00 490.00 1020 ~899~5 12/21/01 864 ~0L A~ 1104000 ~834 ~ 12/18 0.00 '9 1020 589985 12/21/01 864 ~0~ A~D 1101000 ~YO~ ~ 0.00 .00 T~ ~ 0.00 141.49 1020 589986 12/21/01 1032 AH DI~ /NC 6308840 P~TS/SUPP~IBS ~24429 0.00 41.37 1020 589987 12/21/01 968 ~ A~ P~TS 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 52.16 1020 58998~ 12/21/01 968 ~ A~ P~TS 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OPEN ~C 0.00 5V.54 1020 589987 12/21/01 968 ~P ~ P~TS 6308840 FY 2001~2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 65.06 1020 589987 12/21/01 968 ~ ~ P~TS 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 94.12 1020 589987 12/21/01 968 ~ A~ P~TS 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 O~ ~C 0.00 50.21 1020 589987 12/21/01 968 B~ ~ P~TS 6308840 1020 5~9987 12/21/01 968 ~ A~ P~TS 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 19.22 1020 589987 12/21/01 968 ~P ~ P~S 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 O~ P~C 0.00 43.46 ~ ~CK 0.00 348.30 1020 589988 12/21/01 720 ~'~-r~KY SYS~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 69.07 1020 589988 12/21/01 720 ~Y SYS~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 24.30 1020 589988 12/21/01 720 ~Y SY~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 48.55 ~ ~B~ 0.00 141.92 1020 589989 12/21/01 88 ~Y ~ SHE~VZ~ ZNC 2708405 P~TS/~P~ZSS 0.00 43.20 1020 589989 12/21/01 8~ ~Y ~ SHELVZ~ ZNC 2~08405 P~TS/SUPP~/ES 0.00 1836.00 1020 589989 12/21/01 88 ~Y ~ SHS~V~ Z~C 2708405 ~ZG~ ON ~30880 0.00 142.86 ~ ~g~ 0.00 2022.06 1020 589990 12/21/01 1348 ~Y$~ F~ ~ ZNC 1108407 TI~/~TERI~ 0.00 1120.00 1020 589991 12/21/01 2495 ~OLI~ B~ 5806449 SBRVI~ ~ ~R 0,00 3 RUN DATE 12/20/01 1'THE 10:56:11 - FINANCZA~ ACC'0~XNG 1020 589992 12/21/01 2480 BERNARD, KAR~N 1104300 SUPPLIES 0.00 81.59 1020 S89993 12/21/01 904 BNYNESTER~T~UST C0~PAN 3555301 1992 ~S~IES A 0.00 4058.74 1020 589994 12/21/01 867 BRI~ ~ ~ 2709430 P.0.900030281 ~Y~ 0.00 47423.28 1020 · 589995 12/21/01 2563 ~I~IA J~I~I~ 5208003 ~PLI~ ~16668 0.00 65.38 1020 589995 12/21/01 2563 ~I~IA J~I~I~ 5208003 ~IT ~ ~16668 0.00 -6.00 ~ ~ 0.00 59.3~ 1020 589996 12/21/01 1476 ~ ~SI~ ~O~ 1107302 ~ ~I~ ~ 0.00 4.8~ 1020 589996 12/21/01 1476 ~ DESI~ ~ 110 ~ ~I~ ~ 0.00 985.15 ~ ~ 0.00 990.00 1020 S89997 12/21/01 2232 ~I~, ~ES 110 C~ 0.00 ~06.50 1020 589997 12/21/01 2232 ~, ~ 110 S~ 0.00 103.84 ~ ~ 0.00 410.34 A020 589998 12/21/0~ 147 ~H 5506549 ~ ~H 11/27-12/14 0.00 81.60 1020 589998 12/21/01 147 ~H 5S06549 P~L'AT ~H 11/27-12/14 0.00 17.00 ~020 589998 12/21/01 147 ~ 1106500 P=A-A'f ~H 11/27-12/14 0.00 27.84 %~ 589998 12/21/01 147 ~H 5506549 Pb'~-rY ~H 11/27-12/14 0.00 2.00 589998 12/21/01 147 ~H 5506S49 P=~-A'f ~H 11/27-12/14 0.00 65.62 1- ~ ~ 0.00 194.06 1020 589999 ~2/21/01 149 ~H ~101000 P~ ~H 12/12-~2/18 0.00 309.20 1020 589999 12/21/01 149 ~H 1104510 P~ ~H 12/12-12/18 0.00 26.15 ~020 589999 12/21/01 149 ~ ~104000 Pmrrf ~H ~2/12-12/18 0.00 1020 S89999 12/21/01 149 ~ 1104100 P~-~-A'f~H 12/12-12/18 0.00 15.87 1020 589999 12/2~/01 149 ~H 1104300 P~n'~ ~ 12/12-12/18 0.00 8S.71 1020 589999 12/21/01 149 ~H 1108503 Pn'rL-f ~ 12/12-12/18 0.00 40.00 1020 589999 12/21/01 ~49 ~H 1100000 P~r~ ~H 12/12-12/18 0.00 1020 589999 12/21/01 149 ~H 1104000 ~A-~'f ~ 12/12-12/18 0.00 18.50 1020 589999 12/21/01 149 ~H 1101200 P=-rA-f~ 12/12-12/18 0.00 27.96 1020 S89999 12/21/01 149 ~H 61098S6 ~'~ ~H 12/12-12/18 0.00 10.79 ~ ~ 0.00 564.13 1020 590000 12/21/01 155 ~ ~0~ ~ 1108303 S~IBS ~1S057 0.00 304.6~ ~020 590000 12/21/01 155 ~ ~O~ ~ 1~08303 ~PLI~ S15063 0.00 274.64 ~ ~ 0.00 S79.2S 1020 590001 12/21/01 1057 ~IDI~ B~FITS SERVIC 110 *F~ ~/24012S 0.00 1020 590001 12/21/01 1057 ~DI~ B~FI~ $~V[C 1~0 *F~ DEP/240125 0.00 172.75 ~ ~ 0.00 454.00 1020 590002 12/21/01 1156 ~ 110 ~ 0.0O 117.00 ~020 · 590003 12/21/01 2552 ~R S~ I~ 270840S P~TS ~ ~ 0.00 1180.92 1~ , 590004 12/21/0~ ~91 ~TI~ ~ OF ~ 2204011 ~T 0.00 S9.46 12/20/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO pAGE 4 ACCOUNT'rNG pBRIOD~ 6/02 CHECK REGT~T~A - DTSBU'RS~MS~T FUt~ SEL~TION CRITERIa.: trar~act.t~ans_dal;e bet~eer~ "12/17/2001" and "12/21/2001" FUNI) - 110 - G~/~I~IA~ FU~q) OI~$H ACCT CHECK NO ZsSU~ DT .............. VE~IDOR ............. F~D/DI~pT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SA3.,SS 'lAX ~40UNT 1020 590004 12/21/01 191 CUPERTINO CH~ER OF ~ 2204011 /~T 0.00 129.85 1020 590004 12/21/01 191 CUPERTINO CHT~ER OF C0M 2204011 Tr, T 0.00 18.67 TOTAl, OI~CK 0.00 207.98 1020 590005 12/21/01 2564 D~I,E SANFORD'S 1100501 36# TV & 1'~3601 NO~I*TO 0.00 2592.00 1020 590006 12/21/01 209 DE ~IqZA SBRVICSS IgC 5708510 SPSC.$ERV. NOV 18, 200 0.00 75.00 1020 S90006 12/21/01 209 DE A~A SERVICES ZI~TC 1108504 SPSC.SSRV. NOV 28,2001 0.00 195.00 1020 590006 12/21/01 209 DE AHZA SSRVZCES ZNC 5606640 ~TMIZTORI~L DSC2001 0.00 420.68 1020 590006 12/21/01 209 DE ~'~- S~RVZC~S ZNC 5708510 SPSC.SEgV. DBC 2,2001 0.00 75.00 1020 590008 12/21/01 209 DE Alf~ SERVICES INC 5606620 ~TITORIAI~ DSC2001 0.00 420.68 TOTAl, OISCK 0.00 1185.36 1020 590007 12/21/01 ME2002 DEJ.~-,~Z~O, RB1'HAI~)O 1103300 DR'rNKs FOR ~ pARTY 0.00 62,01 1020 590008 12/21/01 676 DSP~.R'II~NT OF ~*,dS'IZCR 1104510 OCT2001 FZNGBRPRZNTS 0.00 128.00 1020 590008 12/21/01 676 DRPAR~ OF ~TJSTICE 1104510 NOV2001 FINGERPRINTS 0.00 . 96.00 TOTAL CH~CK 0.00 224.00 1020 590009 12/21/01 214 DEPAR'I't~,~IlT OF TRA~SPORTA 1108602 FY 2001-2002 OPEN ~J'RC 0.00 141.35 1020 590010 12/21/01 213 DSPT OF GBI~R~T~ SSRVZCRS 5606640 CA I~tUI,TIPI~ AI~ARDS SO! 0.00 '~ 79 1020 590011 12/21/01 850 * DIDDA~~: A*4~ZINO p~RTY ET 5806349 SUpPLISS #23867 0.00 ' o.47 1020 590011 12/21/01 850 DIDD~M4S A~-~ZING PAR'IY ST 5806249 SUFPLIS$ #23880 0.00 21.49 TO'IAL CHSCK 0.00 27.96 1020 590012 12/21/01 1994 DIS'Z'RZCT A'I'I~R/4~y '~ltUST 110 A I,OPSZ JR 566398126 0.00 23.08 1020 590013 12/21/01 225 DONS RIGHT ROOFZNI3 & GUI' 1108407 ' TZMB/I,~.TERZALS 0.00 4576.62 1020 590014 12/21/01 1434 EDII~U) S. II~SH CO. 1108314 PARTS/SUPPLTES 0.00 3486.46 1020 590014 12/21/01 1434 ED~MID S. IIA~SH CO. 1108314 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 3842.21 TOTA~ CHSOI 0.00 7328.67 1020 590015 12/21/01 1912 ]~D~CU:J~RG~qCY LTGHTII~ 1108502 P~I'S/SUPPLZSS 0.00 42.13 1020 590015 12/21/01 1912 ST.~BSCO:~I'4SRC,~-~TCY ~.ZGHTZN 1108504 PAR'IS/SUPPr.ZSS 0.00 42.38 TOTAL OIECR 0.00 84.51 1020 590016 12/21/01 242 KMPLOYM~F DEVEL DSPT 110 -qI?/932-0014-5 0.00 '16905.11 1020 590017 12/31/01 243 EMPLOYM~IT DRVELOPI~NT 110 SDI/776~5260~0 0.00 246.9S 1020 590018 12/21/01 258 FANII,Y SUPPORT TRU~-i'ag 110 14 ORDZNIZA 548373456 0,00 157,38 1020 590018 12/21/01 258 F~4Z~.¥ SUPPOR'I TRUS'lBS 110 V ORTEG~ 563312780 0.00 352.62 TOTAI~ OIECK 0.00 510.00 1020 590019 12/21/01 260 FBDSRA~ ~XPRSSS CORP 1108601 COURIER SBRVI*CR 0.00 16.48 1020 590020 12/21/01 261 FBI-Gl & PBERS ASSOC ZNC 110 TRAFFIC STUdy R#16985 0.00 134 '3 RUN DATB 12/20/01 TI~4~ 10:56:13 12/20/01 CITY OF CUPSRTIH0 PAGE S ACOD~ll~G PSRTOD: 6/02 ~CK ~ZS~ - DISB~ ~ 1020 590021 12/21/01 ~002 ~, ~ 1104400 ~X~S~P~ ~X~E 0.00 15.00 1020 590022 12/21/01 268 ~ ~ SE~X~ SYS 1108~03 P~/~PLZ~ 0.00 188.79 1020 590023 12/21/01 ~ Falak, ~inde~ 550 Reft: ~eck - Rental 0.00 750.00 1020 590024 12/21/01 2027 ~ ~CX~ 1104400 S~Z~ 12/13 0.00 128.00 1020 590025 12/21/01 281 ~ 1108406 ~Z~ ~15055 0.00 518.]6 1020 590026 12/21/01 776 ~ ~ ~ A E~l 6308840 S~PLZ~ ~15499 0.00 542,41 1020 59002~ 12/21/01 1335 D~XSE ~S 5806249 S~VZ~ ~ ~R 0.00 45.40 1020 590028 12/21/01 ~002 ~X~ 1108101 ~T~E & ~LI~ 0.00 XS.00 1020 590029 12/~1/01 298 G~BR ZNC 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 65.84 1020 590029 12/21/01 298 ~Z~ XNC 1108830 P~TS/~XES 0.00 703.08 1020 590029 12/~1/01 298 G~X~ ZNC 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 65.84 ~ ~ 0.00 834.76 1020 590030 12/21/01 2116 ~18 & ~XA~S 1108101 S~VZ~ ~ ~R 0,00 8550.00 590031 12/21/01 1898 HORX~ 1108303 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0,00 386.46 1020 590032 12/21/01 2096 ~IC ~O~, INC. 6308840 P~TS/SUP~Z~ ~15040 0.00 248.77 1020 590033 12/21/01 343 ~ ~Z~ ~-45 110 *I~ 0.00 444B.79 1020 590034 12/21/01 995 ZNS~V ~ 1108502 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 167.04 1020 590034 12/21/01 995 ~NS~V ~P~ 110~504 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 16~. 04 1020 590034 12/21/01 995 ZNS~V ~ 1108501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 167.04 10~0 590034 12/21/01 995 I~S~V ~ 1108504 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 167.04 1020 590034 12/21/01 99~ ZNS~V ~ 1108502 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~ 0.00 167.04 1020 5900~4 12/21/01 995 ZNS~V ~ 110~501 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 i67.04 ~ ~CK 0.00 1002.24 1020 590035 12/21/01 1242 INS~- ~I~ ~102100 B. ~/~Vl~ 0.00 51.98 1020 590035 12/21/01 1242 Z~-~S 1104510 ~OB ~~ 0.00 505.83 1020 590035 12/21/01 1242 I~-~I~S 1104530 B. ~/~US 0.00 51.97 ~ ~ 0.00 609.78 1020 590036 12/21/01 1981 I~A~ ~FIC ~ 2708404 SUP~Z~ ~15052 0.00 V5.60 1020 S90038 12/21/01 2335 KI~ HO~ A ~A~S 4209538 ~ZC ~ ~ 0.00 608.35 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KI~ ~ & ~IA~ 4209537 ~LZC ~ ~ 0.00 380.22 1020 590038 ~2/2:/0~ 2335 KI~ H~ & ~S~IA~S 4209536 ~IC MOR~ ~ 0.00 608.35 1020 590038 ~2/2~/0~ 2335 K~ HO~ & ~ZA~S 2709532 ~LZC ~ ~ 0.00 3293.30 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 K~ ~ & ~A~ 4209539 ~1C ~ ~ 0.00 458.30 1020 S90038 12/21/01 2335 KI~ H~ & ~S 4209538 ~LIC NOR~ ~ 0.00 488.85 · ~ 590038 12/21/01 2335 KZ~ HO~ & ~IA~ 4209539 ~ZC MO~ ~ 0.00 570.33 RUIt~ D~'I'S 12/20/01 T~'~,~ 10:56:13 - FZNAI~CZAL 12/20/01 CITY OF t.3Jt-]/.qTlN0 PAGE 6 &~TNG p~Ri'OD: 6/02 CHECK P, BGISTES o DZSBORS~ITI' FUND SELECTI0~ C3tlTERI&: t. ranfic~-.t-x'ans_dat, e be~'ween #12/17/2001# and #12/21~2001# Ft~D - 110 - G~SRAL FU~D CAS~ ACCT CH~CK NO ZBSU~ DT .............. VSNDOR ............. FUliD/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAILS TAX ~4OL4~ 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KXM~EY HORN & ASSOCIATES 4209536 PUBT-XC MORKS CO~C~ 0.00 488.85 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KZ~,E¥ HORN & ASSOCIATES 4209536 PUBLIC WORKS CO--CT 0.00 208.38 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KI~Y H~ & ASSOCIATES 4209537 POBLIC I~ CC~ 0.00 110.97 1020 S90038 12/21/01 2335 EIM~EY HORS & ASSOCIATES 4209537 I~TH 1fORKS CC~CT 0.00 305.53 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICIt4LEY HO~ & ASSOCIATES 2709532 PUBLIC WORX# C~TRACT 0.00 2646.38 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICIML~Y HORN & ASSOCZATS~S 2709532 PT~T-1C WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 1128.10 1020 590038 12/2:1/01 2335 ]CIMLEY ~ & ASSOCIATES 4209539 'PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 523.44 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCTA~ES 4205536 PUBLIC HORS# C(~4TRACT 0.0O 177.55 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICInG, BY HORN & ASSOCIATES 2709532 PUB~.IC #ORKS CONTRACT 0o00 961.14 1020 590038 12/21/01 2325 ]CIMI, BY HORI~ & ASSOCIATES 4209538 PL1BLTC WORKS C0~CT 0.00 558.33 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICIMI~Y HOR~ & ASSOCZAI'ES 4209530 PUBZ, IC JfORKS C~CT 0.00 177.55 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICTML~"~ HORN & ASSOCTATSS 4209539 P~IC #ORES COSTRACT 0.00 166.45 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 XI~ HOR~ & ASSOCIATES 4209537 PUBLIC ~fOiXS CC~CT 0.00 348.95 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KI~&,EY HO~.N & ASSOCTA~ES 4209S36 PUBLIC ~(ORKS C~CT O.00 558.33 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICI~,EY HOItI4 & ASSOCIATES 4209539 p~TC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 195.35 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KIMI,EY HOP~/ & ASSOCIATES 4209530 PUBLIC WORKS C0~TTEACF 0.00 208.29 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 KTI~ HOR/4 & ASSOCIATES 4209537 PUBT-IC J~ CO--CT 0.00 130.24 1020 590038 12/21/01 2335 ICI~I~EY HORN & ASSOCIATES 2709532 PUBLIC WORKS CC~fl'RACT 0.00 3022.53 ~OTA~ (~IBCIC 0.00. 18324 * 19 1020 590039 12/21/01 372 KIlfl(O~$ INC 1106300 SUPPLIES S23890 0.00 6.26 1020 590039 12/21/Ol 372 KINEO'$ /NC 1106200 SUppT-II~S J23890 0.00 ' 27 1020 590039 12/21/01 372 KINk"O*S ZNC 1106400 SV~-PLIES #23890 0.00 26 7~ (~IECI( 0.00 lu.79 1020 590040 13/21/01 2550 ICREI~S & J~ZliE5o INC. 1107302 PROF $ERV WIREI~SS PLA 0.00 9470.00 1020 590041 12/21/01 M2002 IC~I, HRMA 1101042 TTIE #A~ RECEPTIOrJ 0.00 39.97 1020 550042 12/21/01 2300 BARBARA LAT~C 5506549 SI~RVICE AGRB~ FOR 0.00 160. O0 1020 590043 12/21/01 404 LONGS DRUG STORES #250 5806349 SUPp~II~S #23208 0.00 39.18 1020 590043 12/21/01 404 I~ DRUG STORES 8280 5806349 SUPPLIES #23209 0.00 34.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 73.70 1020 590044 12/21/01 142002 KAHN, BRZA~ 5506549 PIANO DED. ~ KXPN 0.00 250.00 1020 590045 12/21/01 M2002 M~, DO~, BRO~ 250?304 C~? FEES LAHD USE 0.00 330.00 1020 S90046 12/21/01 1252 F, CT ~ 1104400 Y1483502 11/1-11/30 0.00 3.06 1020 S90047 12/21/01 2301 MIC~I~Y-q 88698 5806349 SUppT.IBS #23206 0.00 49.42 1020 590047 12/21/01 2301 MIC~TM #8698 5806349 SUPpLTSS #23207 0.00 53.30 TC~rAL CRNCX 0.00 102.72 1020 590048 12/21/01 540 MII~PI?AS MO~ INC 6308840 PARTS/SUPPLIES #15055 0.00 122.74 1020 S50045 12/21/01 444 MIlTL~'S IA~mER 11O85O1 PARTS/SUPPLIES #2O472 0.00 24.66 1020 590049 12/21/01 444 HIm~l'S I,UJa~S 11O8312 SUPPLIBS #22469 0.00 20.73 TOTAL CHSCIC 0.00 '9 DATE 12/20/01 ?ZMB 10:56;14 - FZNAI~CIAL ACCOI,q~II~ 12/20/01 ¢IT~ OF C~I~'~ZNO PAGE ~020 590050 ~2/2~/o~ 2448 ~, ~ F. 5506549 ~K~ SYS~/~Y~S 0.00 ~99.79 ~o20 59o05~ 12/2~/o~ 455 ~ ~ 5806249 S~V~ ~R~ ~R 0.00 22.00 1020 590052 ~2/22/0~ ~002 ~IS, ~ 580 ~P~ ~T ~ 584019 0.00 LS.00 1020 590053 12/21/0~ 1123 ~I~ S~ ~PPhlES 5806349 ~UP~ ~23889 0.00 42.6~ 1020 590054 12/2L~0~ 465 ~AIN VI~ ~ ~ ~1083~5 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0,00 112.32 1020 590054 12/21/01 465 ~A~N VI~ ~ ~ 1~08315 ~ 200~-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 64.69 ~ ~CK 0.00 17~. 0~ 1020 590055 12/21/01 113V EZ~ ~Y 1101500 ~SES 10,11,12-2001 0.00 60.07 1020 590056 12121/01 470 ~ ~Z~ 1106500 ~P~ZgS ~16021 0.00 190.~1 1020 590057 12/21/01 302 ~TI~ ~F~D ~ 110 *~T'L DEF 0.00 15255.85 1020 590058 12/21/01 2534 NC ~ ~p~ 6309820 NC SZX B~ 0.00 1195.00 1020 590058 12/21/01 2534 NC ~L ~ 6309820 ~l~, SHZPPZ~ ~ 0.00 119.00 ~ ~ 0.00 1314.00 ~ 590059 12/21/01 2562 ~ ~Z~ ZNC. 1108501 TI~/~RZ~ 0.00 1785.00 lO~u 590060 12/21/01 485 ~ ~FZC SI~S 2708405 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 27V6.00 1020 590061 12/21/01 2488 ~R~ ~ 6308840 P~TS ~15004 0.00 101.66 1020 590061 ' 12/21/01 2488 ~R~ ~T 6308840 P~TS ~15004 0.00 208.72 ~ ~g~ 0.00 310.38 1020 590062 12~21[01 489 ~ ~ZC S~ 5806249 S~V1~ ~ ~R 0.00 508~.00 1020 590063 12~21~01 1681 ~-~AY ~ ~P~Y I~C 5606620 SUPP~Z~ ~21004 0.00 21.60 1020 590064 12~21~01 2206 O.K. FIR~ ~ ~ 1104400 S~VZ~ & ~PPLIES 0.00 257.30 1020 590065 12/21/01 ~2002 O~ZV~S, R~ZN 1100000 R~ ~ ~53518 0.00 41.39 1020 590056 12/21/01 501 OP~TZ~ ~Z~ ~3 110 1020 590067 12/21/01 507 ~ OS~ D~:~ 6308840 1020 590067 12/21/01 507 ~ ~ ~ 6308840 TZ~/~Z~ 0.00 1~5.00 1020 590067 12~21/01 507 ~ ~ D~:~B0~ 1108315 TZ~/~Z~ 0.00 322.~6 1020 590067 ~2~21/01 507 ~ ~ ~ 6308840 ~Z~/~Z~ 0.00 245.59 1020 S90067 12/21~01 50~ ~ ~ D~:~ 1108602 TZ~/~Z~ O.00 385.47 1020 590067 12/21/01 507 ~ ~ D~ 6308840 TZ~/~Z~ 0.00 285.00 1020 590067 12~21/01 507 ~ ~ D~:~ ~108303 TI~/~I~ 0.00 322.~6 ~ ~ 0.00 1939.2~ 1020 590068 12/21/01 ~33 P g R S 110 *P~ B~K 0.00 269.95 1~' 590068 12/21/0~ 833 P E R S 110 PERS 1959 0.00 98.49 R~ D~TS 12/20/01 T'rM~ 10:56:15 12/20/01 CITY OF CUPBRTZNO PAGE 5 ~ING PERIOD: 6/02 CHECEREGIb-i~R - DISBURSEMENT ~ SEhECTION CRITERIA: crans&cC.Crans_da~e between "12/17/2001" and "12/21/2001~ ~ - 110 - GENERAL FU~D CASH ACCTO.IBCKNO ISSU~DT .............. V~IDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX 1020 590068 12/21/01 533 P E R S 110 PERS EMPLY 0.00 23818.51 1020 590068 12/21/01 833 F E R S 110 *PSRS BYBK 0.00 180.14 1020 590068 12/21/01 833 P E R S 110 pERS SPEC 0.00' 120.59 1020 590068 12/21/01 833 P E R S 110 PERS BUYBK 0.00 37.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 24525.20 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 12/7-1/06 0.00 245.17 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 12/7-1/06 0.00 89.44 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 5606620 12/07-1/06 0.00 89.45 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 5708510 12/07-1/06 0.00 89.45 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108505 12/07-1/06 0.00 59.45 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 11085O4 12/07-1/06 0.00 89.44 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 12/07-1/06 0o00 89.45 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 5708510 12/7-1/06 0,00 245.17 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108504 12/7~1/06 0.00 490.33 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 12/7ol/06 0.00 245.17 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108505 12/7ol/06 0.00 245.17 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1101500 12/7-1/06 0.00 245.17 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 6104800 12/07-1/06 0.00 259.20 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1101500 12/07-1/07 0.00 89.45 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 12/07-1/06 0.00 89.45 1020 590069 12/21/01 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108505 11/13-12/06 0.00 TOTAL CH~CK 0.00 3 1 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECT, IRITY IH 1108507 REC FIRE FEB2002 0.00 160.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108506 SECURITY/FIRE FEB2002 0.00 45.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST EECU~I/~ IN 1108503 SEC~JRZ~f/FIRE YJ%R2002 0.00 78.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108506 SECURITY/FIRE MAR2002 0.00 45.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108504 FIRE SYSTEM JAN2002 0.00 199.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108504 FIRE SYSTEM FEE2002 0.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 110850~ FIRE SYSTEM MAR2002 0.00 199.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108511 SECURITY/FIRE JAN2002 0.00 68,00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SEC~RITY IN 1108508 SECURITY FSS2002 0.00 36.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108508 SECURITY MAR2002 0.00 36.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 SECURITY/FIRE JAN2002 0.00 122.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY ZN 1108501 ACCESS SYSTEM FEE2002 0.00 101.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 SECURITY/FIRE FEB2002 0.00 122.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108508 SECURITY JAN2002 0.00 36.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1106501 SECURITY/FIRE MAR2002 0.00 122.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 ACCESS SYSTEM JAN2002 0.00 101.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1106511 SECURITY/FIRS MAR2002 0.00 68.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC ~EST SECURITY IN 1108506 SECURITY/FIRE JAN2002 0.00 45.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108501 ACCESS SYSTEM MAR2002 0.00 101.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY ZN 1108511 SECURITY/FIRE FEB2002 0.00 68.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 RSC FIRE MAR2002 0.00 160.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFZC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 SECURI,TYMAR2002 0.00 38.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 SRCURITY FEB2002 0.00 38.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 SECURITY JAN2002 0.00 38.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 REC FIRE JAN2002 0.00 160.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108503 SECURITY/FIRE FEB2002 0.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510 SECURITY/FIRE J~N2002 0.00 1. RUN DATE 12/20/01 TIWE 10:56:16 - FINANCIAL ACCO~ING 12/2o/o~ C~TY OF CUI'~TIRO 1020 59007~ 12/21/01 515 P~FIC ~ SB~Z~ ZN 1108503 ~I~/F~ ~002 0.00 ~8.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 P~F~C ~T SE~ IN 5708510 S~I~/FZ~ F~2002 0.00 136.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 P~IFZC~ST SE~Z~ IN 1108503 SB~Z~ FEB2002 0.00' 36.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC ~ SB~Z~ IN 5708510 SB~Z~/F/~ ~2002 0.00 136.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACIFIC ~T SE~Z~ ZN 110850~ SE~Z~ ~2002 0.00 45.00 1020 590071 · 12/21/01 515 PACZFZC ~ST Sg~l~ IN 1108505 SE~Z~ ~82002 0.00 45.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 S15 P~IFIC~S~Z~ IN 1108503 S~~002 0.00 36.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 P~IFIC ~ 8E~Z~ ZN 1100503 SE~I~ ~002 0.00 36.00 1020 590071 12/21/01 515 PACZFZC ~ST ~S~I~ IN 110~505 SB~ ~002 0.00 45.00 ~ ~ 0.00 3192.00 1020 590072 12/21/01 1099 PA~Z~ Z~2709450 S~VI~~ ~ 0.00 21820.00 1020 590073 12/21/01 533 P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 110 ~ ~/~2405 0.00 262.16 1020 590074 12/21/01 5]7 P~O ~S ZNC 1108314 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 1093.66 1020 590074 12/21/01 537 ~0 ~ Z~ 1108303 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 1093.66 1020 590074 12/21/01 537 P~O ~O~S Z~ 1108315 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 1093.66 1020 590074 12/21/01 537 P~O ~OD~S INC 1108302 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 1093.66 590076 12/21/01 509 ~ S~S~S ~NC 5806349 ~P~IBS ~23874 0.00 ~9.93 ,._d 5900~6 12/21/01 509 ~ S~S I~ 5806349 ~Z~ ~16785 0.00 98.41 10~0 590076 12/21/01 509 ~ S~S Z~ 1106343 S~IES ~23861 0.00 10.59 1020 590076 12/21/01 509 ~ ~S I~ 5806349 ~PP~IES ~23888 0.00 50.00 1020 590076 12/21/01 509 ~ ~PB~S INC 5806349 S~P~Z~ ~23900 0.00 21.45 1020 590076 12/21/01 509 ~ ~S ~NC 5806349 S~Z~S ~15630 0.00 200.00 1020 590076 12/21/01 509 ~ S~TS INC 1106343 1020 590077 12/21/01 ~002 ~A OF ~ERTINO 1104510 ~S/~ ~01-02 0.00 270.00 1020 590078 12/21/01 1406 ~I~S ~0~ 6308840 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 32.43 1020 590079 12/21/01 944 ~ILZTAT~S~S 1104510 ~R~Z~ ~TZ~ O.00 256.20 1020 590080 12/21/01 581 ~LZ~ 1104300 ~PP~ ~12095 0.00 67.67 1020 590080 12/21/01 581 ~Z~ 1104300 S~I~ ~12096 0.00 92.58 ~ ~C~ 0.00 160.25 1020 590081 12/21/01 600 R~-R~ S~ 8~RVIC 1105505 ~I~/~I~ 0.00 540.00 1020 590082 12/21/01 602 ROY~ ~ ~ ~506549 ~S DBC 10,11,12 0.00 2262.00 * 1020 590082 12/21/01 602 ROY~ ~ ~ ~506549 ~S~RTATI~ ~ 6 0,00 466.56 1020 590083 12/21/01 2043 R~B~S PB~ ~ 1108503 ~1~/~I~ 0.00 415.00 1~. 590083 12/21/01 204~ R~'S ~~ 1108504 RUN DA'Z~ 12/20/01 TIH~ 10:56:16 12/20/01 CITY OF CU~'TNO PAGE 10 ACCOUTRING pERTOD: 6/02 CHECK R~GISTER - DZ~U~S~ ~ SEI,ECTIC~ CRTTERIA: t:::ans&ct..l:::arm_da~.e be~-ween '12/17/2001" and '12/21/2001' FLI~D - 110 - G~HERAI, FLeD C~SIt ACCT Ci~CK NO ISSU~ DT .............. VSNDOR ............. l~q.q~D/Dglvr ..... DESCRZPTZOIq ...... S~.,ES TAX 1020 590083 12/21/01 2043 RUDg'S PENT MANAGEMENT 1108505 TTME/MATERIAt,S 0.00 415.00 'I~OTAL CHECK 0.00 1380.00 1020 590084 12/21/01 614 SAFE MOVES 1108603 BTCyCI,K AND pEDENTRTAN 0.00 1600.00 1020 590086 12/21/ol 026 ~Am'A ~ CO DEP'F OF R 11023.00 CTTATIOI~S 0C1'2001 0.00 2826.00 1020 590086 12/21/01 1636 SANTA CLARA CTY SHERIFF 1104510 I~OV2001 F1'NGERpRTNTS 0.00 36.00 1020 590007 12/21/01 833 SANTA CT,ARA COUNTY SHERT 1102100 V~ SECUR:ITY 0.00 324'7.77 1020 690087 12/21/01 833 SANTA CI,ARA ~ SHERX 11023.00 VAIalaCO SECURITY 0.00 43.87.16 TOTAL CH~CK 0.00 7394.93 3.020 590088 12/21/01 3.488 SEARS 1108501 SUPPLX~S #15936 0.00 32.38 1020 590089 12/21/01 2430 SENVICE STATION S'~Tt:aSS, 6308840 REpATEN #15496 0.00 146.25 3.020 590090 12/23./01 651 SIERRA pACTFZC TURF SUPp 5606640 SUPPLIES #15709 0.00 202.77 1020 580091 12/21/01 1837 $TI,`1C'O~ VAI,I,K~' PAVTNG CO 2708404 TTt,~/MA'I'KR`1ALS 0.00 2910.00 1020 590092 12/21/01 1548 $OI,ANO PRESS BOOKS 1101500 SU'BSCRXPTTONS (3) 0.00 '~'~.02 1020 590093 12/21/0'1 665 SOUTH BAY Pt~'~'ROPOT.:~TAN 5806449 SERVICE AGRS~UU~'F FOR 0.00 1~t,:~.44 1020 590094 12/23./01 891 ~OAN SPI'TSEN 5506549 ~'AN 6&24 GRATUITTES 0.00 72.00 1020 590095 `12/21/01 677 STATE STRRET BANK & TRUE 1`10 *PERS DEF 0.00 2220.10 1020 590096 12/21/01 f*~2002 $~, DOR(YI'HY 2204010 I,RAD~R~HIP SUPPLIES. 0.00 61.65 1020 590097 12/21/01 2513 MAR"AIA MARIA STE**rNER 5506549 pACK/TAZCH'r SESSIONS 0.00 220.00 1020 590098 12/21/01 690 ~AX~ FOP. D 6308840 Lu'Y 2001-2002 OPBH PORC 0.00 7.96 1020 590098 12/21/01 690 ~AL~ FORD 6308840 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 34.60 1020 590098 12/21/01 690 SI,*~N*FVAL, E FORD 6308840 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 03.57 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 106.13 1020 590099 12/21/01 1825 SUPENTOR FRTCT'FON 6308840 pAR?B/STJF'pT.IES #15031 0.00 102.51 1020 590100 12/21/01 694 STECHRONEX 1108602 GREEN LED FOR tl TURAq *r. 0.00 33'7.50 1020 590100 V 12/21/01 694 EYHCI'~-OHE,X 1108602 GREBH ZED FOR ti ~ 'r. 0.00 -33?.50 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00 1020 590101 12/21/01 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVZCBS OF S 4249210 KI~ SUPPLIES 0.00 3341.10 1020 590102 12/21/01 ?00 ?ARGOT SPECTAI, TY PRODUCT 1108321 FY 200~o2002 OPEN FO~C 0.00 201.74 1020 590103 12/21/01 701 TARGET STOENS 13.08312 SUPI~ZES #15045 0,00 280.16 1020 590103 12/21/01 701 ?ARGST STO~.J~ 5806349 BtiPPX, IEN #16861 0.00 52 `1020 590103 12/21/01 701 TARGET B/'ORE~ 1106343 BUPPLXE$ #16861 0.00 RON BATE 12/20/01 TIME 10:56:17 - FTI~ANCI. A~ AC~XNG zz/3o/oz ACCO~TI'~NG PERIOD: 6/02 Ci~CK REGISTER - DZSB~ ~ - 11o * G~ ~ ~H A~ ~CK NO l~ ~ .............. ~ ~ o.oo s~s.~2 1020 590104 12/21/01 2545 TZ~r~Y 5506549 ~ 6 FZN~IO'S 0.00' 2400.00 ~020 SS0~0S ~2/2~/o~oo2 ~TI, S~ 1108315 ~T~.~ 11/05-~2/04 0.00 66.40 1020 590106 ~2/2~/0~ 710 ~ ~S 5806249 S~V1~ ~ FOR 0.00 7053.70 1020 590107 ~2/2~/01 1993 ~ OF ~ ~ LiO A ~PEZ ~ 566398~26 0,00 161.54 Ao2o 59o~o8 ~2/2~/0:724 ~ & i~i~ui~ 6308840 ~2oo:-2oo2 o~ ~c o.oo 42.5~ 1020 590109 ~2/2~/0~ 727 U S ~ 1104300 BLK~ 74 ~A~ ~/9/0 0.00 125.00 1020 590110 12/21/01 1631 ~I-~-~ G~ ~ IHC 11083~5 P~TS/~PLI~ 0.00 41.78 1020 590114 ~2/21/01 310 ~T~WlRE~S (~ 1~08505 ~408456999 11/05-12/04 0.00 -61.62 1020 590114 12/21/01 310 ~I~MlpeT.~e~ (~1108602 S408456999 11/05-12/04 0.00 61.59 ~020 590~14 12/21/01 310 ~I~ WI~SS (~ 1108~02 ~408456999 11/05-12/04 0.00 310,52 1020 5901~4 12/21/01 310 ~I~ WI~ (~ 5606620 ~408456999 1~/05-12/04 0.00 58.57 1020 590114 ~2/2~/01 310 ~I~ WIU~.~ (~ 1107503 ~408456999 ~1/05-12/04 0.00 524.04 1020 590114 12/21/01 3~0 ~RI~WlP~$S (~6104800 ~408456999 11/05-12/04 0.00 62.64 1020 5901~4 ~2/2~/0~ 3~0 ~IZ~U~T-~"$ (~ 5208003 J408456999 11/05-12/04 0.00 57,64 1020 590~14 ~2/21/0~ 310 ~Z~MT~r.~e~ (~1101200 ~408456999 Z~/05-~2/04 0.00 64.~2 ~CK 0.00 2353.29 1020 590115 ~2/2~/01 746 VIKI~ OPFI~ ~O~S ~08503 ~BS 0.00 97.94 ~020 5~0115 12/2~/01 746 V~KI~ OFFI~ PRODU~S 6308840 S~PLI~ ~2442S 0.00 49.10 ~CK 0.00 147.04 1020 S90~ ~2/2~/02 745 ~020 590~16 12/21/0~ 745 ~I INC ~03500 ~O~ S000 DIIN SDI 0.00 583.20 RUt~ DATE 12/20/01 TIt,~ 10:56:18 12/20/01 Cz~Y OF CUeaJtYZNO PAGE 12 ACCO'tI~I'TNG P~RIOD: 6f02 ~CK ~I~R - DZSB~ ~ SS~I~ ~ZT~: cra~act. Crans_~ce ~c~een ~12/17/2001' ~ '12/21[2001· ~ - 110.- G~ ~ 1020 59011~ 12/21/01 2174 ~0~ ~ S~I~ 1104000 ~SFO~D/~V TE~ 0.00 29.45 1020 590119 12/21/01 2561 NOR~ ~l~ B~, INC. 1104400 ~ ~165~2 0.00 392.~ 1020 590120 12/21/01 2093 ~ ~FF 1104530 R~P~ ~T CK~585063 0.00 39.99 1020 590121 12/21/01 2000 XP~ F/~T AID 1108504 'S~P~Z~ 0.00 113 1020 590122 12/21/01 962 ~I~ ~Vl~ 5506549 ~P~l~ ~ 12/10 0,00 35'.93 ~ ~H ~ 0.00 33e563.99 ~ ~ 0.00 338563.99 ~ ~RT 0.00 318563 . 99 RLq~ DATR 12/20/01 TINE 10:56:18 - FINAI~CIAT, ACCOi~TZh'G RESOLUTION NO. 02-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDs PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 28, 2001 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of tho following claims and demands and to the availability of fimds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and. do,Lands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the' following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this ?th day of January ,200l, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino. 12/27/01 CZT~ OF CU~ERTIN0 PAGE ACCO'~TING PERZOD: 6/02 'CHECK REGZST~R - DISBURSEmeNT 'FUND $EI~CI'ZON CRITERIA: ~ansac~.~ans_da~e bekween '12/24/2001· and .12/28/2001" ~ - 110 - G~RAI, ~ C~.SH ACCTOISCKIqO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FU~D/DSPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... S~,~S TAX 1020 588630 V 10/19/01 H2002 ~PPL~ CONPUTER, INC. 5506549 S~IH~IC~4BNT EDI?ING C~ 0.00 -400.00 1020 590123 12/28/01 4 A T & T 1108501 NOV2001 SERVICE 0,00' 14.43 1020 590124 12/28/01 29 LYNI~ DIAI~E&ITI~N 5806449 S~RVZCS ~RE~NT FOR 0.00 299.00 1020 590125 12/28/01 H A~USH-ABEN, NIT&I 580 . Refund: Check - FALl. 0.00 51.00 1020 590126 12/28/01 993 H&CI~YN BADDE.~EY 5506549 RS-INBURSSNENTS 0.00 ' 300.04 1020 590127 12/28/01 H2002 P, ACE 1104530 2002 DUES (4 ~BRS) 0.00 120.00 1020 590128 12/28/01 H2002 CUPERTINO HIGH SCHOOL 1101031 2001 EDUC~TION~I, GRANT 0.00 10000.00 1020 590129 12/28/01 208 DE AN~,A COL~EGH I~DIA CE 1101031 PU'9~IC ACCESS 3RD QTR 0.00 24515.50 1020 590130 12/25/01 890 DE ~;gA PRZNTING SERVICE 1101000 PHOTO (D.BU'/~-~-J 0.00 29.00 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE AN~,A SERVICES INC 1108502 DEC 2001 HAN2TORI~ 0.00 3930.59 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE ~/~/~ SERVICES INC 1108511 DEC 2001 ~IITORZA~ 0.00 1091.16 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE ANnA SERVICES INC 1108407 DEC 2001 ~ANITORI~T,, 0.00. 1004.89 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE ~4q~J~ SERVICES ZNC 1108314 DEC 2001 HAI~ITORIAI, 0.00 7397.09 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE ANnA S~RVICES INC 1108505 DHC 2001 HANITORI~J, 0.00 00 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE ;Mq~A SERVICES IHC 5708510 12/5 & 12 C~RPETS 0.00 ,25 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE AI~A SERVICES 1NC 5708510 SPEC SERV DEC 11 0.00 75.00 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE AN~J~ SERVICES INC 1108501 DEC 2001 ~ANITORI~ 0.00 2659.57 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DB ~ER SERVICES I~C 1106509 DSC 2001 H~iITORI~ 0.00 1306.45 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE AN~ EERVICES INC 1108503 DEC 2001 ~ITORIAL 0.00 1675.05 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE AN;A SERVICES INC 1108506 DE~ 2001 H~ITORIA~ 0.00 323.78 1020 590131 12/28/01 209 DE AI~ZA SERVICES 1NC 1108504 DEC 2001 H~ITORZA~ 0.00 5679.18 1020 590131 12/26/01 209 DE ANnA SERVICES INC 5706510 DEC 2001 HAIqITORIAL 0.00 2356.09 1020 590131 13/26/01 209 DE M;ZA SERVICES INC 1108507 DEC 2001 ~ITORIA~ 0.00 1440.53 TOTA~CHECK 0.00 32752.63 1020 590132 12/28/01 1838 DE~'.~. HARK~TING L.P. 6104800 DIHENSION 4300 P4 1.6 0.00 1333.80 1020 590133 12/28/01 1983 DESIGVA GATES CONSTRUCt! 2709450 PUBLIC NORES CONTRACT 0.00 119592.90 1020 590134 12/28/01 2468 ANN ~ 5806449 SERV2CE AGRESNENT FOR 0.00 322.00 1020 590135 12/28/01 2040 E3,SYRE~DING VO2*~GUIDB 11O4330 S~SY READIi;GV.GUIDS 0.00 120~00 1020 590136 12/28/01 1434 EDHARD S. #ALSH CO. 1108314 PARTS/SUPPGIES 0.00 32.40 1020 590136 12/28/01 1434 EDHARD $. #A~SH CO. 1108314 PAR?S/SUPPLIES 0.00 352.73 1020 590136 12/20/01 1434 girARD S. #AI~H CO. 1108314 P~.RTS/SUpp~zES 0.00 735.48 TOTaL CHECK 0.00 1130.61 1020 590137 12/28/01 262 FIRST PId~CE INC 11010O0 ESSEX CLOCE/H~YOR 0.00 233.65 1020 590136 12/28/01 273 ~ UNION H.S. DIS~. 5806449 FY 2001-2002 OPEN PURC 0.00 5~ 00 RUE DA/~ 12/27/01 TI~ 10:07:03 - FINANCIA~ ~ING 12/27/01 CTTY OF CUPERTINO PAG; 2 S;~I~ ~lA: ~=~act. ~rana_~e ~t~en "~2/24/200L" ~d 'Z2/28/200~~ ~H A~ ~CK NO IS~ ~ .............. ~R ............. ~/DE~ ..... D~Z~ION ...... S~T.~ T~ ~ ~020 5~0139 12/28/01 275 S~ ~ 580644~ SERVI~ ~ FOR 0.00 4684.60 1020 590~40 12/28/01 ~O02 G B ~A~ H~, ~ ~10 ~ 4St B~ ~E 0.00 4500.00 ~020 590~41 ~2/28/01 H ~R, YI~ 580 Ref~d: ~eck - F~. 0.00 ~7.00 Z020 590142 ~2/28/02 H ~, RI~ 580 Ref~d: ~eck - F~. 0.00 ~7.00 1020 590143 12/28/01 M ~, ~ 580 Ref~d: ~eck - F~. 0.00 75.00 ~020 590~44 ~2/28/0~ 296 ~ ~B 5806449 ~VI~ ~RE~ ~ 0.00 1800.00 ~020 500145 12/28/0~ 3~5 ~ ~F 5806449 SERVI~ ~ ~R 0.00 402.50 · 020 590~46 ~2/28/01 M H~, RI~ 580 Refund: ~ck - WlH'r~ 0.0O 17.00 1020 590147 12/28/01 M HOR~, NZ~O~ 580 Ref~d: ~eck - ~ ~ 0.00 499.00 1020 590148 12/28/01 353 IR~ ~N 1104300 ~ 2001-2002 OP~ ~C 0.00 198.36 1020 590149 12/28/01 2374 ~ZI/SPA, ~NC. 1101000 ~p ~p ~ ~ 0,00 963.60 ~ 590150 12/28/01 2285 ~ ~Y ~O~-~'~ 1106265 S~VZ~ ~ ~R 0,00 53.74 590150 12/28/01 2285 ~ ~y ~ 1106500 S~VI~ ~RE~ ~R 0.00 133.76 ,z. ~ ~ 0.00 187.50 1020 590151 12/28/01 N ~o~Bon, Alan 550 RE~ 124~0 A 12472 0.00 ]90.00 1020 590152 12/28/01 385 ~ ~a-*-~ S~P~Y 1104400 ~ SUPP~Z~ PgR ~ 0.00 1622.16 1020 590153 12/28/01 ~2002 ~, ~ 1108830 P~TS/~ZES 0.00 106.92 1020 590154 12/28/01 ~ ~RZA, ~ 580 Rerun: ~eck- ~R 0.00 16,00 1020 590155 ~2/28/0~ 405 ~ DR~ ~114 1108601 ~P~IES ~21822 0.00 21.38 1020 590156 12/28/01 H ~u, ~en ~lng 550 Reft: ~eck - RenkaZ 0.00 ]00.00 1020 590157 12/28/01 910 N A T O A 1101031 ~TZ~ ~S~IATZ~ O O.OO 960.00 1020 590158 12/28/01 1550 ~IS L ~I~ 1103500 S~VZ~ ~ ~R 0.00 585.00 1020 590159 12/2~/01 1850 ~IN ~YS~ P~ 6308840 P~TS/~PLI~ ~15060 0.00 163.40 1020 590160 12/2~/01 248~ ~R~ ~T 630~840 P~TS/SUPP~IES ~15046 0.00 ~77.63 1020 590160 12/2~/01 2488 ~R~ ~ST 6308840 P~TS/S~Z~ ~15046 0.00 244, B~ ~ ~CK 0.00 . 622.51 1020 590161 12/2~/01 1190 R~ O~S 1103500 S~VI~ ~ ~R 0.00 200.00 10~. 590162 12/29/01 2241 O~ ~ 1108501 S~V;~ ~ FOR 0.00 337.50 RUN DATE 12/27/0X T,X~,~ 10t07:03 - FTNAHCXA~ AC~XI~' 12/27/01 CTTY OF CUP~9.TINO PAGE 3 ACCO~I'NG P~RTOD: 6/02 CH~CK REGTSTBE - D'rSBURSE/~ FT~iD 8BI~CTION C~TTSRIA: t~m~sact.t~ans_date beC~een "12/24/2001" and "12/28/2001" Ft~D - 110 - G~A/ER~ ~ C~.SH ACCT CH~CK ~ 'rSSUE DT .............. VE~IDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCR'rPT'rC~T ...... ~ TAX AYIOUNT 1020 5901~3 12/20/01 N PER,'1'2:, OEZT 500 R~FUl~DS 122577 & 12257 0.00 46.50 1020 . 590164 12/28/01 545 ~TEFF pI'SBRCH'ro 5/;06640 GOt'.F COURSE CONTRACT I 0.00 1544.00 1020 590165 12/28/01 647 EI, I'ZABETH SHA~N 5006449 SERVICE AGRt~I~,NT FOR 0.00 460.00 1020 590166 12/28/01 1954 SPH~q.~'ON CORPORATI'O~T 1107301 ~T.GEORGE #/E 12/09 0.00 064.00 1020 590167 12/28/01 684 Cf/ERYC, $'~ODDARD 5606449 SERVTC~ AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 373.75 1020 590160 12/28/01 (;95 b~SCO FOOD S~RVTCE,q OF S 5506t;49 EUPPL~ES 0.00 157.56 1020 590168 12/28/01 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SUPPr.'rEs 0.00 $6.39 TOTA,I. CHBC~ 0.00 214.25 1020 590169 12/20/01 M2002 THE TRUST l~'OE PUBI,IC JAN 1106100 ?.SMITH CONF 1/28/02 0.00 25.00 1020 590170 12/28/01 708 NANCY THOMPSON 5806449 SERVICE AGRE~HEIqT FOP, 0.00 322. O0 1020 590171 12/28/01 725 T~IST~R$ G~TTCS zNC 5806449 $BRVICE AGR~ FOR 0.00 14533.75 1020 550172 12/26/01 M YASICANA, YO0'! 580 Refund: Check- FAT,I,. 0.00 9..50 ~¥A~ C,~SE ACCOUNT ~ . 00 227~,. ,4 TOTAI~ ~ 0.00 227053."/4 · ~¥AI~ RSPORT 0.00 227553.74 DATE; 12/27/01 T'r~ 10:07:04 - FI~MIC'rAy., RESOLUTION NUMBER o2-oo4 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFYER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON December 21, 2001 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL $397,281.52 Less Employee Deductions $(122,000.63 ) NET PAYROLL $275.280.89 .-. Payroll check numbers issued 57789 through 58000 Void cheek number(s) CERTIFIED: ~ ~.~ Dir~tor of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of January ,2001, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino RESOLUTION NUMBER 02-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON January 4, 2002 WHEREAS, the Director of Adminis~ative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and' to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL $424,290.25 Less Employee Deductions $(145,754.17) NET PAYROLL $275,536.05 Payroll check numbers issued 58002 through 58223 Void check number(s) CERTIFIED: (x~ff~jZ~7 ~ Director of Admunstrat~ve Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o£the City Council of the City of' Cupertino this 71:h day of ' January ,2001, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 3-).. City Hall ._ 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 CITY OF Telephone: (408) 777-3182 CU PEI;LTINO (408)777-3109 CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION SUMMARY Agenda Item No. q Meeting Date: Jammry 7, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE: Adoption of a resolution extending the participation of the City of Cupertino in the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVASA). BACKGROUND: In 1992, the City of Cupertino and a majority of the cities within the County adopted resolutions that authorized participation in the AVASA program. The AVASA program provides State reimbursement for COsts that participating cities incur for vehicle abatement services. During the fiscal year 2000-2001, the City of Cupertino received a -- reimbursement amount of $33,213.34 for the removal of 285 abandoned or inoperative vehicles from both public and private property. This program has a ten-year life with a te,,,ination date of April 30, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: To continue participation in the AVASA program through April 30, 2012, Staff reCOmmends adoption of this resolution. ATTACHMENT: Memorandum from AVASA Treasurer, Lt. Joseph F. Kirby, Sheriff's Office Submitted by: Approved for submission: Alex Wykoff David W. Knnpp Code Enforcement Otllcdr City Manager Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority - AVASA-AVABA-AVASA-AVASA-AVAGA-AVABA-AVABA-AVASA-AVA~A-AVASA-AVASA-AVASA - December 7, 2001 M~ORAND~ To: City of Cupertino From: Joseph F. Kirby, Lieutenant, Sheriff's Office Treasurer, AVASA Subject: Extension of the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority for Another 10 Years Recommendation: Adoption of a resolution that: (a) Requests thc extension of thc Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVASA) for another 10 year term beginning May 1, 2002; Co) Authorizes the continuation of the Cupertino's participation as a member of the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority; (c) Approves the City's continued participation in the existing "Agreement for Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority" and the collection, by the Depmh,ent of Motor Vehicles, of one dollar ($1.00) vehicle regi~hation fee for this purpose. Backaround: Sections 9250.7 and 22710 of thc California Vehicle Code provide for thc establishment of a service authority for abandoned vehicle abatement if the county board of supervisors, and a majority of the cities within a count~,, adopt resolutions supporting such action. In 1992, the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities within the county adopted resolutions authori~in.a participation in the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Smwice ... Authority. This service authority was e~__nb!ished on May 1, 1992 for a term of ten years to .._ provide County law enforcement and code enforcement agencies with resources to facilitate the proper removal and disposal of abandoned vehicles. Santa Clara County's AVASA sunsets on April 30, 2002. Analvsis: Senate Bill 106, recently s/gued into law, amended Section 9250.7 of the California Vehicle Code wh/ch es~___bl/sbed the AVASA prolpum. The amendment authorizes the extension of the serv/ce fee for each Service Authority for increments of l0 years if the County Board of Superv/sors, by a two-th/rds vote, and a majority of the c/ties having a majority of the incorporated population within the county, adopt resolutions prov/ding for the extension of the fee. The County of Santa Clara and its cities and towns are ctu~ently participating in tiffs pror~um. A City Counsel Resolut/on approving the extension of the program is required for thc prolgam to continue beyond April 30, 2002. Adoption of this resolution would reauthor/ze the City's participation in the AVASA Program until Apr/l 30, 2012. To prevent a disruption of our current fund/n~ all resolutions must be completed, colleclrd by the AVASA Board of Directors and then set on to the California H/ghway Patrol no later than the end of Januao, 2002. Pursuant to California Vehicle .Code 9250.7, this prolPam imposes an annual vehicle regiah~tion fee of one dollar on each vehicle registercd to an owner with an add,ss in Santa Clam County. Revenue coH/~ted by the Depa~'tmont of Motor Vehicles in Santa Clara County is used to reimburse participating agencies in the county based on a formuln that allocated 50% of available -. funding based on the jurisdiction's population percentage and the other 50% based on a jurisdiction's percentage of vehicles abated county-wide. In FY 2000-2001, the City of Cupertino received reimbursements in rite amount of $33,213.34 from the AVA,SA Program for its expenses related to the removal of 285 abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperative vehicles from public and private property. This amount is equal to 52% of the total cost of providing one of our most requested calls for service. Vehicle abatement enjoys strong community support. Cost lmulications: This program provides State reimbursement for ongoing costs the City will continue to incur for vehicle abatement response services whether or not the AVASA Program continues. AVASA STATE REPORT WORK SHEET FY2001 Year to DATE Revenue~ pmnn~ savlms ..d Su~im Idq=r P. Kmms TOTAL. C~ ~ S ~.01 S 1~,~.~ S 610.~ S S 1~,240.~ ~l ~ S ~,81Z~ $ 21,~5.~ S S $ 21,~.~ C~ S ~,21~ $ ~,613.28 S 1~.~ S $ ~,~1.~ ~ $ ~,~.~ S 71,810.~ t 4,~.40 S $ L~ S 15,~.~ S 1~.~ S 1,4~.~ S $ 13,~.~ L~ ~T~ ~ S 4,1~ S 6,~.~ S ~.~ S S 6,~.~ L~T~ S ~118.~ S ~,1~.15 S ~4.~ S" S ~,516.~ MI~ S ~,~1.11 S 61,1~.~ S Z~.~ $ $ ~,411.~ ~ ~ S 1,~.~ S 4,~1.~ ~ 2~61 S $ 4,~0.~ ~ ~ S ~,~.~ S 11~.~ S 8,~78 $ S lg,~.~ P~O ~TO S 51,~.~ S 4K~.~ $ ~.0t S $ ~,1~ ~ ~ $ ~,~ S 1,~,~ S 113,~.~ S S 1,1~,~.~ ~A~ S ~,112.91 S ~1.11 ~ 1,~4.~ S $ 73,~5.~ ~T~ $ 17,~ S 17,~.~ S S S 17,~.~ ~ S 151,81~51 S 1~,173.~ & 9,~.13 S S 1~,~ NUMBER OF VEHICLES ABATED FY2001 Quaffer I Qullt~ 2 Quml~ $ Qumtlr 4 YEAR TO DATE AVA.~A Authodiy ~.~e~ 4~1 4A46 6,101 21J71 COUNTY 191 161 201 183 7'~ ~ ~ 273 lg2 157 275 GtLROY 271 283 272 313 1,138 LO~ .4d.'l'O~ 28 18 19 19 82 LOS .~L.'ro~ HIU.S 5 3 4 I 13 IdOflTE 8ERENO 2 2 2 2 MORGAN HILL 76 34 24 205 MOUNTAIN VIEW 83 91 88 120 PALO AJ. TO 174 1~0 175 209 718 6AN JO~E 3,038 2.735 2.381 3,467 11.~01 SANTA CLARA 49~ 2~ 200 317 1.'~'~ - RESOLUTION NO. 02-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING CONTINUED PARTICIPATIOIN IN THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR ANOTHER 10 YEAR TERM BEGINNING MAY 1, 2002 WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code authorizes the establishment of a service authority for the abatement of abandoned vehicles in Santa Clara County and the imposition of a one dollar ($1.00) vehicle registration fee, if the Board of Supervisors, by a two-thirds vote, and a majority of the cities having a majority of the incorporated population within the County have adopted resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority and thc imposition of thc fcc; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that abandoned, inoperable, wrecked, dismantled vehicles or parts thereof pose a health and safety hazard and are found to be public nuisances; and, WHEREAS, on November 4, 1991, the Cupertino City Council adopted Resolution No. 8531 approving the establishment of and participation in the Santa Clara County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVASA) and authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino desires to continue participation in the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and share in the monies in said Abandoned Vehicle Trust Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by thc City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: 1. That the City of Cupertino shall continue to participate in the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Pwgram from May 1, 2002 to May 1, 2012; and 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the contract with the Department of thc California Highway Patrol for participation in said Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program. Resolution No. 02-006 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meet/nE of thc City Council of thc City of Cupertino this 7* day of Sanuary, 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino ~ City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue CITY OF c~-~t~o, (408) 777-3~27 ¢ U Pl:l l NO 777. 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM ~ AGENDA DATE: January 7, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE 1. Approval to reclassify one Senior Civil Engineer position in the Public Works Department to Assistant Director of Public Works. 2. Approval of a $250 monthly automobile allowance for the new classification of Assistant Director of Public Works. BACKGROUND - Four senior management positions (the Director of Public Works, Senior Civil Engineer, Senior Architect, and the Service Center Manager) are allocated to the Department of Public Works to oversee the Department's workload and resources. In the Engineering and Traffic Divisions, this includes continual oversight of consultants who serve as the prime resource for engineering, architecture and construction management, the review of development projects, as well as the day-to-day management of the Municipal Service Center. In February one Senior Civil Engineer position was added to assist in the management of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The current staffing structure provides engineering and architectural expertise for oversight and implementation. However the activity and demand for project and general department management is rapidly out stripping current capacity. While consultants continue to be the prime resource for Engineering, Architecture and Construction Management, the Public Works depazhuent staff must manage the consultants and have continual oversight of the ClY as well as the management of the traffic and transportation activities, review of private development projects and environmental issues, and the Service Center Manager is fully engaged with maintenance projects and operations. In the early 1990's a number of cities reduced ongoing expenses by eliminating mid- management positions. Cupertino was no exception and several engineering positions were eliminated including the position of Assistant Director of Public Works. With the retirement of the incumbent in 1992 that position was eliminated from the department and never restored. ta#nteUonF?ecy~leataa~er With the retirement of the incumbent in 1992 that position was eliminated from the department and never restored. Recently, the Senior Civil Engineer position became vacant, and in a review of the department's current and future management needs, it is recommended that the vacant Senior Civil Engineer position be reclassified to the position dropped in 1992, i.e., the Assistant Director of Public Works. This position is at a higher level than the other management positions and would be a more competitive recmiti~ent for the broad range of engineering and management responsibilities of the Department of Public Works. Therefore, to fully discharge the department's responsibilities and ensure continuous and full managr~r~ent of the many demands.for the department's services, staff is proposing the reclassification of one vacant Senior Civil Engineer to the position of Assistant Director of Public Works in the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. FUNDING Annual funding for the reallocated Assistant Director of Public works position would be approximately $138,000 including salary and benefits. Although the recommended salary range for Assistant Director is approximately 10% above the salary range for Senior Civil Engineer, funding for the proposed reclassification can be absorbed from current salary savings resulting from existing vacancies and no budget adjustment is necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that thc City Council approve: 1. The reclassification of a vacant Senior Civil Engineer to Assistant Director of Public Works. 2. Resolution No. (~- 01~ amending Resolution No. 00-185, Policy No. 4, to add a $250 monthly automobile allowance for the new classification of Assistant Director of Public Works. Submitted by: Approved for Submission: Ralph A. Quails, Sr. David W. Knapp Director of Public Works City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 02-007 A RESOLLrrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING POLICY NO. 4 OF THE UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION PROGRAM TO ADD A $250 MONTHLY AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 00-185, Unrepresented Employees Compensation Program, set forth a number of policies, including Policy No. 4, Automobile Allowances and Mileage Reimbursements; and WHEREAS, Policy No. 4 authorizes automobile allowances for specified classifications which require the use ofpersonsl vehicles for City business as a condition of employment; and WHEREAS, the new classification of Assistant Director of Public Works is required to regularly use a personal vehicle for said City business. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Unrepresented Employees' Compensation Program, Policy No. 4, Automobile Allowances and Mileage Reimbursement, be emended as shown in "Attachment A" which is incorporated in this resolution by this reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7~ day of January, 2002 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino ATTACHMENT A City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTRD EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 4 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCES AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall- be compensated fairly for the use of personal automotive vehicles on City business. In many instanccs the use of personal vehicles is a condition of ~t-ployment due to the absence of sufficient City owned vehicles for general transportation purposes. It is not intended, however, that such a condition of employment should work an undue hardship. For this reason, the following policies shall apply for mileage reimbursements. Those persons who occasionally are required to usc their personal automobiles for City business shall be reimbursed for such use at an appropriate rate established by the City Council. Submission of reimbursement requests must be appwved by the Depa~h,ent Head. Employees in the following classifications shall be paid on a monthly basis the following automobile allowance: Classification Allowance City Manager $350.00 City Attorney 350.00 Director of AdminisWative Services 300.00 Director of Community Development 300.00 Director of Parks and Recreation 300.00 Director of Public Works 300.00 Assistant Director of Public Works 250.00 City Clerk 250.00 Human Resources Manager 250.00 Public Information Officer 250.00 Traffic Engineer 250.00 Recreation Superv/sor 200,00 Secretary to City Manager 200.00 Senior Architect 250.00 Senior Civil Engineer 250.00 Employees receiving automobile allowance shall be eligible for reimbursement for travel that exceeds two hundred miles round trip. Adopted by Action of the City Council April l, 1974 Revised 7//4, 5/?9, 6/80, 7/81, 8/84, 7/87, 1/89, 7/90, 7/92, 6/96, 8/99, 6/00, 5/01, 9/01, 1/02 8 City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue '-- Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 CITY OF (408) 777-3354 CUPE INO FaX (408)777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM -~ AGENDA'DATE January 7, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Award of the Traffic Signal Modification Project at Blaney Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard, City Project No. 2001-01, to Republic Eleclric in the mount $ 89,350.00 and approval of a contingency of $10,000.00. BACKGROUND The intersection of Stevens Creek and Blaney Avenue has required several modifications to provide more efficient turning movements and better accommodations for pedestrians. This project will include adding protected left tums for both northbound and southbound movements, provide full-protected pedestrian crossings, and promote an efficient traffic flow. Additionally, last year, while attempting to install protected pedestrian signal indications as an upgrade, it was discovered that some of the conduits were filled to capacity and required replacement, thereby requiring this project to fully upgrade the pedestrian signals. This project will fully accommodate our previous attempts to improve the intersection as more pedeslrian friendly in promoting a "walk-able" community. The schedule originally called for completion by the first of this year. However, some additional redesign was necessary which pushed the bid date back more than one month. In order to partially offset this delay, the City has already procured the traffic signal equipment. Therefore, assuming favorable weather conditions, this modification will most likely be completed in February 2002. The Engineer's Estimate was $57,400.00 within a project budget of $75,000.00. Only one bid was received at $89,350.00. After evaluating the bid received to reconcile the difference, several items in the estimate were lower than actual trait prices which appear to prevail in this bidding climate. Therefore staff believes that this bid, even though a sole bid, represents a fair price for the work required. However additional funding to award the contract and allocate a contingency of $10,000 will be required. The required additional funding of $25,000 is available in the neighborhood traffic calming account. Because the main intent of this project is to increase pedestrian protection, this would be an appropriate source of funds to complete the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council award the project to Republic Electric, in the amount of ' $ 89,350.00 with a 10 % contingency amount of $10,000.00, for a project total of $ 99,350.00. '~~~ Appr°ved f°r submissi°n:~ Ralph A. Q-~!ls, Jr. ~ David W. Knapp Director of Public Works City Manager City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3262 CITY OF FAX: (408) 777-3366 PEI INO Public Information office SUMMARY Agenda Item ~' Date: January 3, 2002' Subject: Acceptance of Titanium G-4 laptop computer from Apple Computer. Background: On December 21, 2001, the City Manager received a letter from Apple computer acknowledging the gift of a Titanium (34 laptop computer to be used by city council and staff for business purposes. The attached letter fxom Michael Foulkes, State and Local Government Affairs Manager for Apple Computer concisely explains the gift and its intent. Recommendation: Accept the Titanium G-4 laptop computer from Apple Computer and authorize the Mayor to send the attached thank you letter. Submitted by: Approved for submission: Rick Kitson David Knapp Public Information Officer City Man~ger December 21, 2001 City Manager, Dave Knapp Cupertino City. Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino CA 95014-3202 RE: laptop Gift to City of Cupertino On behalf of Apple Computer, Inc., I am happy to present the City of Cupertino with a Titanium G4 laptop computer ~ a gift. This computer is to be used by the City Council and City Staff for business purposes. I leave it to your collective discretion as to how it will be used beyond that. Cupertino is Apple's home, and I hope that our city offic!als will take this opportunity to become more familiar with the latest Technology we have developed. As we discussed previously, this computer has already been delivered to City Hall. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or would like any technical help at 408-974-2503. Sincerely, L~'~.~?.~-~77 ~ ........... State & ~ Government Affairs cc: Jason Kaune, Nielsen Merksamer 1 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014-~84 408 996-1010 phot 408 996-0275 fax www. apple.com .~ City I-lall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3212 CITY OF FAX: (408) 777-3366 CUPE INO OFFICE OF THE MAYOR January 7, 2002 D. Michael Foulkes Manager State and Local Government Affairs Apple 1 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014-2084 Dear Mr. Foulkes, . On behalf of the City Council and staff of the City of Cupertino, thank you for the generous gift of the Apple laptop computer. The Titanium G-4 is another excellent example of why Apple Computer continues to represent the state of the art in personal computer design and performance. Your gift will allow us to continue to provide state of the art service to to residents of Cupertino. Sincerely, Richard Lowenthal Mayor of Cupertino 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CITY OF (408) 777-3308 C U PEtLTINO c4o8) ??7-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDA NO. (~ AGENDA DATE January 7, 2002 SLTMMARY: Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 09-U-01, regarding a use permit for the continued use of a shopping center parking lot for car storage at 10071 S. Blaney Avenue (APN 369-03-014). The appeal was filed by the applicant, Gary Schmidt. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council may take any of the following actions: 1) Uphold the appeal and approve use permit 09-U-01 (see enclosed Model Resolution for approval). 2) Uphold the appeal and approve use permit 09-U-01 with modifications as desired by the City Council. 3) Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission decision to deny 09-U-01. BACKGROUND: · On October 22, 2001, the Planning Commission denied the above request tbr a use permit (see attached staff reports and minutes). · On November 1, 2001, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission decision to the City Council (see attached appeal). · On December 3, 2001, the City Council granted a one-time continuance of the appeal to this meeting of Saon~ry 7, 2002. DISCUSSION: A six-month use pe~,~it for car storage was originally approved by the Director of Comm~mlty Development in February 1999. Subsequently, the Planning Commission approved a use permit in August 1999 and a one-year extension in September 2000, to allow the car storage use to cor~finue. The use permit extensions continued to identify car storage as a temporary use. The property is bordered to the east (across Blaney Avenue) by the homes on Brenda Court and the Shell gas station. It is bordered to the south by the Biltmore apartments and to the west by Chili's restaurant. The car storage area is located to the rear and side of the "Blaney Center" retail building. Pdnted on Recycled Paoer Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 09-U-01 January 7, 2002 Page 2 ISSUES: Planni~ Commission: The Planning Commission's denial of the use permit was generally based on the incompatibility of the proposed use with the City's Iongoterm~ land use plans for Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Commission was interested in encouralling another use for the pwperty. The discussion also included comments that the usc was. innocuous (not highly visible), and that an extension might be considered to allow the applicant to develop more permanent plans. However, the Planning Commission ultimately voted 5-0 to deny the use permit. A1)vlicant: The applicant and his representative included the following points in support of the application: the car storage use is not necessarily permauent; efforts are being made to develop perwsnent development plans for tho property; the car storage is at the rear of the property and not along Stevens Creek Boulevard and consequently is not highly visible; and there have not been any complaints. Public: There were no public comments at the Pla~n;ng Commission meeting, only a written comment supporting the Planning Commission decision to deny the usc permit that was included on the enclosed public hearing appeal notice. Staff: Staff believes thai the City's long-te~m interest in the site is defined by the General Plan and the Heart of the City Specific Plan that describe Stevens Crook Boulevard as a unique pedeshlan-oriented activity area. Continuation of temporary storage uses on the subject property may discourage its ndevelopment and may undermine tho viable uses of · surrounding propellies. Similar requests for temporary outdoor storage uses have been discouraged by staff because such plans are inconsistent with the orderly use and development of properties consistent with the Heart of the City Plan. Staff believes it is not fair to other commercial property owners to deny or discourage their requests while continuing to pe~it temporary storage on this property. Enclosures:. Planning Cowm~ssion Resolution 6115 p]annlng Commission staff reports October 22, 2001 (includes model resolution fbr approval ffuecded by the City Council) Planning Commission minutes of October 22, 2001 Appeal dated November 1, 2001 Letter from applicant (Fax dated October 22, 2001) Letter from applicant's attorney, Dell R. Ansland dated October 13, 2000 (requested to be part of the record) Comment fi'om nearby property owner, Arbor Professional Center Color photographs of property, provided by applicant (requested to be part of the packet) Site Plan Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 09-U-01 J~-.~ 7, 2002 Page 3 Submitt ~ by: Approved by: David W. Knapp Director of Community Development City Manager G:planflJn~pdepor t/cc./OguO 1 09-U-01 Denial CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION 6115 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONED PARCEL FOR AN AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE STORAGE FOR TEMPORARY CAR STORAGE SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 09-U-01 Applicant: Gary Schmldt Location: 10071 S. Blaney SECTION H: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL WHEREAS, the Plmmin__g Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section H of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the plsnning Commission finds: a) That the use is not in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and is detrimental to existin___g uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located because it delays redevelopment of the site into a more appropriate use for Cupertino's main street; b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. NOW, THEI~.~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That alter careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for 09-U-01 is not approved. That the subconclusious upon which the findings, and conditions specified in this resolution are based and cox~tslned in the public hearing record concerning Application No. 09-U-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 22, 2001, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 6115 ' ' 09-U-01 ~';': © October 22, 2001 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of October, 2001, at a Rogular Mooting of tho Planning Commission oft he City of Cupertino, State of California, by tho following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Painoe, Chen, Auerbach and Chairperson Kwok NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: .. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATrEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Pias~cki /s/Patrick Kwok Steve Piasecki Patrick Kwok, Chairman Director of Community Development plsnnlng Commission G:~Planning~PDREPORT~RES\09-U-0 Idenial res.doc C~ ~ ~ City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 77%3308 Department of Community Development Application No.(s): 09-U-01 Agenda Date: October 22, 2001 Applicant: Carny Schmidt Location: · 10071 S. Blaney Application Summary: Use pe,mit for continued use of.a vacant commemial parcel for storage of automobiles. · RECOMII~.NDATION: · i Staff recommends denial of 09-U-01 per the model resolution. · 'A model resolution for approval is provided should the Pl~nr6ng Commission decide to approve the use por,,,it. · The application is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, hence no environmental determination is required. · The Planning Commission action is final unless appealed to the City Council. BACKGROUND: · In Febv~sry, 1999, the applicant received a temporary use permit, granted by the Director of Community Development, for new automobile storage for sixth months on a .6 acre parcel to the rear of the commercial area. The parking area provides new car storage for an automobile dealership on Stevens Creek Boulevard in San Jose. · In August 1999, the applicant received a use permit from the Planning Commission for a one-year approval for this use, since a temporary use permit cannot be extended. (see Exhibit A). The use was approved for one year from September 1, 1999 to August 31, 2000. · Last year the Planning Commission granted a one year extension, from September l, 2000 to August 3 l, 2001, which required that a new use permit be applied for should the property owner seek to continue automobile storage on this property. · On August 16, 2001, the applicant applied to extend the use permit for another year, but requested two postponements until this meeting. The property is bordered to the east (across Blaney Avenue) by the homes on'Brenda Court and the Shell gas station. It is bordered to the south by the Biltmore apartments and to the west by Chili's restaurant. The car storage area is located to the rcar and side of the "Bleney Center" retail b~_~i!ding. The existing conditions of approval limit activity on the site to working hours between 8 AM to 5 PM with limited delivery times and no merchandising activities. To date, staff has not received complaints or inquiries from neighboring property owners. Use permit for continued use cfa vacant commercial parcel for storage o£automobiles October 22, 2001 Page 2 DISCUSSION: l~revious staff reports and approvals pointed out that the use of property along Stevens Creek Boulevard for car storage is not desired because it has a detrimental effect on property values and the general ambiance of the street. The General Plan and the Heart of the City Specific Plan describe Stevens Creek Boulevard as a unique pedestrian- oriented activity area, which will be a positive and memorable gathering place for Cupertino citizens. Car storage was approved on a year-to-year basis becaus.e the applicant was pursuing more long-te~'u~ uses for the pwperty and car storage was considered an interim use. The automobile storage use has continued now for 2 years and 9 months. Staff l~elieves that car storage should not be permitted on a continuing basis for several reasons. First, car storage .is not compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses. Secondly, staffroutinely discourages requests from other property owners for temporary outdoor storage uses, including automobile storage, for the reasons stated above. For instance, the staffrecently discouraged a request to store trucks on property located on Imperial Avenue. It is not fair to other commercial property owner to deny or discourage their requests for outdoor storage uses while it is being permitted on this property. The applicant states that the car storage use is unobtrusive because it is not visible from Stevens Creek Boulevard and that he continues to explore development options for the property. Over the past year, the property owner approached staff with several development concepts and staff agrees that the use is not highly visible from Stevens Creek Boulevard. However, staffdoes not believe it is good public policy to allow a use on one property that is not generally allowed for other similarly situated commercial properties and the use is clearly not compatible with the. adjacent retail/restaurant uses or the adjacent residential uses. ,Accordingly, staff recommends denial of this request. The Planning Commission action is final unless appealed to the City Council. Enclosures: Model resolutions Exhibit A: Staff report, conditions of approval and site plan for 6-U-99 P~pared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Communily Developmen~r~. G:planninp~pdepor~pc/pc09u01 2 09-U-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Tort~ Avenue Cupertino, California 9:5014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNINO COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF:CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONED PARCEL FOR AN AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE STORAGE FOR TEMPORARY CAR STORAGE SECTION h PRO~ECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 09-U-01 ; Applicant: Gary Scbmidt Location: 10071. S. Blaney SECTION II: FINDIN(}S FOR USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Pe.-,it, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds: WHBREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: a) That the use is in confmumnce with the Oeneral Plan of the City of Cupertino, and is not detrimcntal to existing uses specifically permitted in the zonc in which the proposed use is to bc located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed usc. SECTION IH: CONDITIONS BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based upon Exhibit labeled Call-land Site Plan as may be modified by additions contained hereim CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. Times of delivery are confined to Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to $:00 p.m. 2. There shsl! be a maximum o£ 10 deliveries per month. 3. All access shall be from Stbvens Creek Boulevard. 4. All portions of thc area to be used for vehicle storage will have a minimum of gravel base. $. No mslntenanceYservicing or merchandising of cars shall occur on site. 6. The use permit is granted for a one-year period beginning on Octobcr 23, 2001 and expiring October 22, 2002. The applicant may request an extension prior to the expiration date. Resolution No. 09-U-01 October 22, 2001 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of October, 2001, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, Stare of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COlVlIVlISSIONERS: NOES: COIvIIVlISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COIVIIVlISSIONERS: ABSENT: COlv~VlISSIO~: -' . ATTEST: APPKOVED: Steve Piaseclti Patrick Kwok, Chairman Director of Community Development PlAnning Commission G:\Plaaning\PDREPOKT~KES\Og-U-O 1 approval res.doc Exhibit A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 (408) 777-3308 DEPARTMENT OF CO~ DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM ApplicationNo.(s): 6-U-99 Applicant: Call-Land Associates Location: 20030 Stevens Creek Boulevard The appl~cant's request is for a temporary use permit to allow the storage of vehicles in a planned development zone district located within the southeast c~mer of the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Blaney Avenue. The property involved is located behind the BIA,~ey Center and Hamasushi Restaurant located withi,~ said intersection. .~ looking toward southeast Vie~, looking toward northeast · ,...~,~?..,.=.. ...... .~.. ........... .,::...~...:.~,,.~._..~.~...~.~~,~ · - .. ~ ' . ~-~ ';~ ~ ~ ~ .~.:;:~.~:.'..'!.;....~i:;:. :.~'..-: ..,..~'::.,'~.:..~,.:~ :~,..~,. ~. .... ~----.~- ~" . ' .-~ ...._~.~ . .~iL,. .... .~.~,.....,,~. ............... ~.~.~.:.'.t,,,,.' ...... ':'.7-'?, ~,.. ~ ." .' ':' "''~ ~5¥~::'.."..~'.....;~... '.'.','-:~'-~"' ........ ~ · ' .' "" '."'.-! 2:.'. ¥.'-.C ...... :., ~...-,.....,--..~.-....~..,:---~......:.-~.?v...~ " ' ' 'i : i~.,! · · · . ., ~ o' ..... .... ....... l%kin~ Vie~, looking to south. Vie~, from Blaney Avenue· . .~'est . DISCUSSION In February 1999, the Director of Comm~mlty Development issued a temporary six-month use permit to allow car storage on said site subject to six conditions of approval..The approval was granted to Don Lucas Corporation, which is headquartered in Cupertino for the purpose of storing Honda vehicles while the Honda Dealership in San $ose was being remodeled. The site plan, labeled "Cali-Land site plan", is attached to describe the general location of the site relative to the Blaney Center, Hamasushl and Ciceros Pi~ Parlor. The property is bordered to the east (across Binney Avenue) by the Brenda Court resid~1 commlm~ty ~ld the Shell ~q ~tiOIL It is bordered to the south by the Bfltmore apsrtments and to the west by the Chili's restaurant. The photo~-aphs describe the general condition of the site. The conditions of approval are intended to limit activity on tho ~ite to worldng hours between 8 to S with limited delivery times and no merch..,ti.ing activities. To date, staffhas not receiwd compl.i~ts from n~ighboring property owners and nor has the city received phone ~11.~ or inquin'es f~om residents since the notice has bcell ~nil~L The attached letter from Matthew Lore, General Manager of Honda Dealersh¥ addressed to the Di~ctor of Comtmmlty Dovolopl~ent states thnt th~ constrtlctioll activity oi1 the Stev~ls Creek Ho,da site was not started du6.ng the initial six-month period. Lucas miuests a 14-month period be~uning in S~tember. Although the parlring lot has not generated Nreb~,~ms for the ~mmct~fi_nte neighborhood, staff Ls concerned about the le~h of time involved in tho request. The City of Cupertin6 hn.~ traditionally been opposed to the use of property along Stewns Creek for storage because it has a detrimental affect on the property values and the general ambience of the street. The lease arrangem .~ on the property held by Call interests preclude total redevelopmm~t of the site within the foreseeable future and thus it is likely that the vacant property behind the Binney Center will be kept in an undeveloped status for some time. Tho site is relatively isolated and the use is quiet, therefore ~,~less residents testi~y at tho hearing that the storag~ has created problems~ staff supports the extemion for one year from Septmaber 1~. RECOMMENDATION: ,a,s~mlng that the Planning Commission oa~ mn~ the ~lnding that tho use will not bo detrimental to neighbozs ba~ed upon testimony at the August 9n hearing, staffrec, omm~ad~ approval of the use pe~nit subject to the conditions of approval that were imposed by the six month use point last Feb~mty. The conditions are outlined in the model ~v, solufion. Submitted by:. Robert S. Cowan Enclosures: Model Resolution Site plan labeled "Call Laud Site Plan" Matthew Lore letter dated July 12, 1999 Director's approval x~port dated February 10, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 5064 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING TEMPORARY USE OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONED PARCEL FOR AN AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE STOP, AGE FOR LUCAS DEALERSHIPS SECTION h PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: '6-U-99 Applicant: Cali-Land Associates Location: 20030 Steve, us Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHERE,~., the Pla-ri{hi Commi.~-sion of the City of Cupertino received an application for extension of a temporary use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds: a) That the use is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and is not detrimental to ~xisting uses specifically permitted in rite zone in which the proposed use is to b~ located. b) That the proper~y involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. - NOW, THEREFOKE, BE IT RESOLVED: that after carefiil consideration of ex. hibits and testimony submitted in this matter, application 6-U-99 is hereby approved and the temporary use of the subject propen'y for auto storage will be resulated in a manner to preclude visual and non impact to neighboring properties. SECTION Irh CONDITIONS BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based upon Exhibit labeled CalioLand Site Plan as ma~, be modified by additions contained her~in. CONDITIONS OF APPKOVAL 1. Times ofdelive~ are confined to Monday through Friday, i:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 2. There shall be a maximum of 10 deliveries per month. 3. All access shall be from Stevens Creek Boulevard. 4. All portions of the a_~a to be used for vehicle storage will have a minimum of gravel base. 5. No maintenance/servicing or merchandising of cars shall occur on site. 6. The use permit is granted for a one-year period beginning on September I, 1999, and. expiring August 31, 2000. The applicant may request an extension prior to the expiration date. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9~ day of August, 1999, at a regular meeting of thc Planning Commission of thc City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS ... ATTEST: :APPROVED: Is/Robert S. Cowan /s/David Doyle · Robert S.iCowan, Dir.ector of David Doyle, Chairman . Community Development Flaaning Commission ~'-,rtas 3 October 22, 2001 5. Application lXlo.: 09-U-01 Applicant: Gary Sohmidt ' Location: 19961 So. Binney Avenue Use permit for continued use of a shopping center parking lot for ear storage Hlanning Com~niJsion decision ftnal unles~ ap~pealed. _l~eque~t ~ost~o. nernent to October 22, 2001 Hltz/ming Commi~ion meeting Chair ]~wok indicated that a request for postponement had beeo received from Mr. Schmidt, and the applicnnt was requesting that a site visit bo conducted with staff. StaffDresentation: Mx. Steve l~iaseeki, Community Development Director, said that staff did not feel a continuance of the application was warranted, and that he felt it would be highly unusual to contia~.e a project .of this scale for the purpose of a sits visit. He said I~oth staff and the applicant could ~/dequately explain the progress of the pmj~'ct without the need for a site visit. Ms. ¢iddy Wordull, City Planner, reviewed the background of the application as outlined in the staff report. She noted that the intent of the various use permits over the last two-and-a- half years were for interim use, not only for the dealer that wanted to store the cars, but also because the applicant vau pursuing other uses for the property. She noted that staff cited a General Plan policy addressing the Stevens Creek area and the Heart of the City Specific Plan area as being a unique pedestrian oriented area; and it was considered through these various procedures as an interim use. Staff&els there are problems with compatibility with the area, as there are residential uses nearby and also the long-term use for something more appropriate for Heart of the City. She said that it has not caused problems in terms of the area, and no complaints about the use had been x~eeived. She pointed out that there are numerous properties throughout the city, particularly in the Heart of the City where other people have been discouraged from applying for storage of automobiles or any kinds of storage activities because of the more desired use for the area. Ms. ~rordell said that staff' feels it is a public policy issue at stake for a more desirable use for the property. Staff mcoramends denial of the extension of the use permit for the property. Mr. Gary $cltmidt, 10071 So. Binney Avenue, dislributed photos of the property and adjacent areas. He illustrated the area of the existing use permit for a 28,000 square foot buildin§issued in 1988, which runs ,~vith the land, noting that it was a two'phase use permit; the first phase tbr a major remodel on the building exterior, in addition to putting in all the Stevens Creek landscape ancording to the Stevens Creek landscape plan, taking out the entire perking lot, regrading it, putting in storm drains, and undergrounding all the mechanical/electrical. He said hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent to upgrade the Stevens Creek area, and it is one of the few parcels on Stevens Creek that fully complies with the Stevens Creek landscape corridor plan and has been in compliance for 12 years. In return, the city granted an unlimited time period to build a building in the rear and partially due to the fact that they were long-term leases on the Binney Center running up to 10 years, which made it difficult to do it moro timely. Mr. Schmidt pointed out what he said be felt ,~vere numerous errors or nomenclatures in the staff report; such ns the use of parking not being compatible with adjacent residential and commercial uses. lie illustrated the property where he had full ownership and the areas where he had only partial ownership in the past. Planning Cbmmis~ion M" ',t~ 4 O{~tO~}Or ~2, 2001 Mr. Schmidt repotted that since the last one-yusr extension, he has submitted four potential plans for approval. He expressed his willingness to put in temporary vegetation, which would soften the ama in the rear parking lot of Hamasushi. Relative to the reference in the staff report to Stevens Creek ba~ng a unique pedestrian experience, and it not being an appropriate use on Stevens Creek, he pointed out tlutt it fronts on Blaney Avenue, not Stevens Creek. He said he felt he, along with other partners, contributed as much or more than any other pan:el' along Stevens Creek to the unique pedestrian experience. He referred to the Imperial Avenue parcel and said that it was not comparable to. the application property, as it was a non-improved dire.log on the street, with no landscaping;, and again streescd that a visit to the sites would be illnstrativaof that. He said that there have been no complaints; and it was within the discretionary power of the Planning Commission to ~,,ant the use permit, and the claim by the city that to grant the use permit would somehow delay ultimate developm~ut of the pwperty was no offer of proot~, and as conjecture he said to deny the moderate economic return on this parcel would be what would delay the develolDment of the propen'y, since ha was using all the money to submit plans and deal with staff. Ho req. hested that the application for an extension to the use permit be approved and a walking tour of'the site be.taken to discuss the comer. He said he felt it was important not to develop it fast, but to develop it fight Mr. Del Osland, aRomey, representing Gary Schmidt, said that he felt the point made by the Planning Department that denial of the permit would enhance or speed up the development of the property into some sort of planned development or redevelopment was not correct. He said that the present agreement with the Honda dealership is on a month-to-mouth basis, and could bc cancelled at any time, and they would be looking to see the highest and best use for the property not just to generate the smallest amount of income; but the money would help in developing the property rather than leaving it completely vacant. Ho pointed out that prior to the cars being stored there, it was vacant for many years. He requested that the letter he wrote prior to last year's meeting be made a part of the records, as it was not presently on file. Chair Kwok opened the meeting for public input; there was no one present who wished to speak. Com. Corr said that he was not concerned with the particular use being obtrusive or bothering anybody, as it was well hidden. He expressed concern that the use was counter to the uses in the Stevens Creek Plan, and noted that it was not just that it was on Stevens Creek, but it was in the Stevens Creek Plan area. He recalled that it was the third time in two years that the applicant was asking for an extension; and what started out as a request for temporary help has turned into an expectation from the applicant to continue granting extensions oftbe use permit. Com. Corr said that he was apprehensive about supporting the extension of the use permit. Ms. Wordell provided a history of thc usa permit, noting that the Hamasushi development was approved as a phased project; Hamasushi was phase 1 and an office building was phase 2, with no time limit on when it could be built. Phase 2 has notbeen built, and is still vested since it was part of the original use permit. She noted that if the applicant provided a valid building plan, the Planning Commission would have to accept it. Ms. Wordell also pointed out that the applicant is proposing a change in plans, and has been working with staff on a different set of plans. Mr. Piasecki said that the city receives no sales taxes from the storage of the autos on the pwperty. and it was presumed the applicant was referring to the economic benefit to him'self and also indirectly allowing him then to pursue plans for development of '/he property, which ultimately could result in an economic benefit to the city. He suggested that concern not be focused on Planning Commission l~:-'~tes ~ October 22, 2001 whether or not it enhances development, but rather is it'an appropriate use, and is it equitable to other property owners since other applicants ate discouraged from doing the same thing. Chair Kwok said that the issue was where to draw the line, as there were two policy decisions; one relative to equity and the other compatibility. He said hc concurred with Com. Corr that a period of two-and-a-half years for extensions of the use permit was ample time to secure the permit, and another extension with no assurance that it would be thc last request, was not in the best interest of the city. Chair Kwok said he felt staff provided an excellent detailed presentation about the site, and he did not feel a site visit was necessary; and would not support continuation of the application for the purposes of a site visit. Com. Auerbach said he learned ab6ut the use of the site as a result of the application, and noted that since it is so well hidden, there have not been consumer complaints about the use. He said initially he felt that the project did not fit inwith the Heart of the City plans, as outlined in the current. I. Genersl Plan and most likely not the future General Plan amendment. He said he felt it was an inert thing, and could be canceled at any time. He said he was more concerned with what was more appropriate for the site if they did not want the car storage there. He pointed out that it was a suburban style development, each building an island with ingress and egress of the street, and not pedestrian friendly. Com. Auerbach said that thc Pinn Brothers development across the street was more in character to their liking; but the question of parking would always be an is, sue. Com. Auerbach said that in layouts such as Mountain View, Pale Alto and others, cars are parked in lots back behind the buildings. He said it was ironic that a future use could be a parking IoL which makes it difficult to argue new cars/used cars as there may eventually be cars back there. He said it was conjecture on his part as to where the General Plan goes; hence he was conflicted over a relatively innocuous use of the site. He said he felt there would not be any development in a year; but was conflicted as he felt it did not meet the General Plan requirements, but he did not see it doing any damage at this point. 'Mr. Piasecki clarified that if the extension was denied, the applicant could appeal the decision to the City Council, and if the City Council upheld the decision, the applicant would not be allowed to store cars on the property. He reiterated that the applicantwas asking for a one year extension of the use permit. Chair Kwok summarized the pros and cons of an extension, stating that an extension would provide more time; since the site is a suburban setting, more ~time is needed to look at the site to review and come to a conclusion what the best land use is for that particular site. In light of the development across the street, he said it should be as compatible as possible in a sense that the applicant does not rush into a plan that would later have to be changed. As to where to draw the line on extensions, he said it might give a three-month extension to work with sta~ff and come up with a better plan, but it would be the final extension. Mr. Piasecki said that the applicant has provided drawings and has been talking with staff, but said three months would not provide enough time to come up with an agreeable plan. He said it' an extension was granted, the period of time in question should be one year; either gran. t the extension or deny the extension. Com. Auerbach said that the drawings shown did not depict what he felt belonged oh the property. He added that he was not pleased with the approved current use, and he felt things had changed over time. Planning Commission IV' ~s 6 October 22, 2001 Mr. Pinsecki said that the approved plan could proceed a~ is; however, if the applicant intended to change the plans, they would have to be presented to the Planning Commission. I-la said that tho applicant was considering both options, to build the approved plan, or build some other plan, but evaluating what is a good use for the property. Chair Kwok reviewed the options: support staff recommendation to deny tho permit extension (applicant could appeal to City Council); 8rant an extension for one year so that the applicant could come up with a better plan; or 8rant an extension of 3 to 6 months so that they could continue to work on an approved plan and give them more time to come up with a plan consistent with the neighborhood. Com. Con' said that another alternative may be to approve the extension for the one year period, but stipul~te that ir'is the last one. ' Com. Patnoo said that the applicant had suggested as part of the approval that he would be willing to add greenery on a portion of the fence .that is exposed, located directly behind the restaurant; which might be considered if tile applicak.~io~ is extended. Mr.' Piaseeki suggested that the Planning Commission ask the applicant that if given one more year, would he agree not to pursue further continuation at the end of the year extension; which is a right he retains; butif he states that it is his intention not to pursue the extension further, it would be a matter of record in the event the issue came back in another year. Mr. Piaseoki said that staff was concerned with setting a precedent, and emphasized that all people have to be treated fairly and equitably; and cautioned about making the distinction of what is visible and not visible and allowing storage of cars, in the event another applicant wanted to store boats. MOTION: Com. Auerbach moved to approve Application 09-U-01 for a one year extension of the existing use permit as shopping center parking lot for car storage SECOND: Com. Corr Com. Con' asked the applicant if he would be willing to state this would bo the last extension requested. Mr. Sohmidt said that he would make every effort to move forward with the pan:el. He questioned if the Planning Commissioners were willing to meet at the property the next day to discuss the matter in detail. Ho reiterated what he felt were his constraints on developing the property as ho. did not own all the parcels. He said there were other considerations involved relative to the possibility of changing office to residential on the second floor of one of the buildin~ and ped~aps adding a third floor of residential. Com. Auerbaoh said that tho corner speaks for itself, and he felt there would bo '~o benefit from taking a tour of the site. He said it was unlikely that the same group of commissioners a year from now would grant a further extension to the use permit; but the present Planning Commission was seeking feedback on whether the applicant would be amenable to the idea and would work to rind an alternate use for the property. Mr. Schmidt said that he would continue to work diligently with the hope that the city. [ncl,',ding the Planning Commission and City Council would continue to do so. Planning Commission 1V' '~tes 7 October 22, 2001 Chair Kwok said that it was important to note in the' use permit that they recognize ail the roadblo~ks,.ooncems and constraints in the project; and that the applicant is aware that it would be the final extension. Com. Corr said that the uso was not related to the development of tho property, and he said he felt if the extension was not approved, the property would still be developed in the same timeline had it been approved. He said it was a question of whether they should allow the storage of cars for another year.. Com. Patnoe said that Com. Auerbaoh could choose to amend the motion to include the portion with regard to some greenery on it,. but he would not support the application. He said ho did not like the use of parking, whether for 10 or 40 cars on the empty lot; and he felt the city has the opportunity to take a stance and not allow the continuance on and on. He said he would rather leave tho area vacant and possibly work to encourage some other uso for tho property. He reitera.l.~d that he would vote to deny the application, as he felt the applicant has had plenty of opportunity. Com. Chert said she concurred with Com. Patnoe; and she did not feel the extension of the use permit would help tho project to move on, and it would set a precedent for future applicants, putting the city in the difficult position to say no to future applicants for a different use of tho lot. She said she would not support the motion to ~rant a one-year extension. Chair Kwok said that he would not support the project as indicated earlier;, and stated that two- and-a-half years was ample time, and by denying the request, it might move tho applicant to expedite the project faster. Com. Auerba/:h withdrew his motion; Com. Corr concurred. MOTION: Com. Patnoe moved to deny Application 09-U-01 SECOND: Com. Chert VOTE: Passed 5-0-0 Chair Kwok noted that the applicant had 14 days to appeal the decision to City Council. OlD BUSINESS: None · NEW BUSINESS: None REPORT OF Tnr~. PLANNING COMMISSION: Environmental Review Committee: Chair Kwok noted that the last meeting as well' as the meeting scheduled for this week were canceled. Housing Committee: Com. Patnoe reported that he had no formal report; but noted ti~at the committee would be busy in the next months relative to the City Council approval et' the housing element, particularly the BMR pro~un. Mayor's Breakfast:. Com. Auerbach reported on the use of the public library, noting that the Cupertino library ranked third or fourth in circulation in the state, behind Los An§e[es and San i ~~ CA 95014 ~on ofP~ Co~ion , OCT--22--e .. .....: ..'.,'.:.. ~..::.:,:..; .... . · ' ~'u~.~.'.~' . · '~i'. ~ .... · · · zo-owm8 .xm~! " ,': ' ~s ":.'; I: '"* * ' · ' ... · ~., ! '~ ,,.~j~., '/.: ..~. ·. ·'."' ': ~ '~ ""'~),I?:'::-:~'.. · .' ......., .: :',.::.. ,;.' . ~?,,~,~ ~L. ~__ ........ : .a~lt. ~ lots f~r th. rgated adj" ' Cic~o'~ ' '~~:"":" ' o.~ p.~ ~ ~ <..)~:.,.... ' ' '; · .:::1 · : -~ ..r .. ~:.1 · ~. :,,..J},:, ,...,. . .,u~ qt,,,o,,,,~ m' ia,it tm,.er~, no ~..'~ .~..~ City'~.s,,in~stion ~ has .... S, The req .uc~ed extension i ~ is a reasot~le ~'quiet and. N .{:N'.in..violmtion of or eonfliot with ale City Mas~ Plan. ', .: October 13, 2000 "'.. Steve Piasccki Director of Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Real Property in Cupertino owned by Cali-Land Associates Dear Mr. Piasccki: This office represents Call-Land Associates in regards to their properties in Cupertino commonly identified as The Blaney Center, the H~ma Sushi Building and the undeveloped 26,000 square foot lot to the rear of same. We have concerns with what may appear to be a pattern and practice of pcx~£rissiveness or perhaps failure to enforce current standards in regards to the City's approval and or regulation of contiguous properties to my clients properties and other properties in the immediate neighborhood that have and/or may have adversely effected my clients efforts to develop their property. While my clients have been attempting for many years to establish a plan for the development of the "undeveloped 26,000 square foot lot" or the re-development of portions of the Blaney Center or the Hama Sushi lot in connection with the development of the 26,000 square foot lot they have in recent years been met with "strict" interpretations of standards and inflexibility on the part of the City of Cupertino in regards to the City's reaction to concepts for development that my clients have presented for review on a pre-application informal basis to the City. The presentations have involved substantial dollars in architectural, legal and'other fees as well as substantial personal time and expenses. As I am sure you are aware, there is an approved development plan which calls for the ramoval of the Blaney Center building, the consolidation of the Blaney Center lot and the rear undeveloped 26,000 square foot lot, a lot line adjustment and thc construction · of a 30,000 square foot commercial office building with underground parking. This '. was a two phase use pei-,,it issued in 1988 which called for substantial expenditures in the six to seven figure range by my clients to, among other things, complete the provisions of the Stevens Creek sidewalk and landscape plans of the City of Cupertino as they related to my clients property. As a part to the approval process to this two phase use pei-~hit and as a consideration of the hundreds of thousands of dollars of monies that my clients were to spend on improvements per the direction of the City that would bring my clients no direct increase in return on their property, the City agreed that the construction of the cOmmercial office building to the rear would be in Phase II of the use p~r,nit and there would be NO time limit for the initiation or completion of Phase II. Thc approval by the City of this usc permit declared that completion of Phase I of the project would activate their use permit and then the rights of construction of the rear bnilding (30,000 sq. Ft. commercial office) would nm with the land. Some years ago because of fiustration with their efforts to finalize agreements to consummate arrangements to facilitate construction of said 30,000 sq. fi. commercial office building, my clients begun to consider, investigate and revicw alternative development projects. They have had numerous conversations over the last 5 or 6 years with a variety of City officials including plan~ing commission members in an effort to craft a development plan that would be acceptable to the City that would be feasible within the constraints of the marketplace. They met personally numerous times with the then director of planning, Bob Cowen, to go over preliminary plans for various potential projects that had been drawn at great expense to my clients but no "light at the end of the tunnel" ever occurred. It should be noted that of primary importance and consideration in any development or re-development proposal is the fact that the rear undeveloped lot is only 80 feet deep (80' x 320'). This creates grcat constraints on its' development especially if the City is unwilling to look creatively at the situation and be flexible in thc application of normal development standards especially set back and day light plane requirements. This brings us to a most important portion ofthls comm~_mication to you. Please note for the record, that approximately 5 years ago the Chili's building to the immediate west of my clients property went through a major remodel and new construction of an amount in exccss of $1,000,000.00. During this permit and approval process, they apparently were not required by the city to complete their portion of the Steven's Creek sidewalk/landscape plan as a condition of their approval. We would like an explanation of the lack of this continuity in the general plsn~ Please forward or make available copies of their application and related files for that Chili's project along with minutes and/or transcripts for all hearings on said applications as well as the final approval resolution and related documents. We will pay for all reasonable costs of duplicating said records. The failure of the City to require the/h to complete thdr portion of the Stevens Creek sidewalk/landscape plan as a requirement of the redevelopment would appear to be disparate but I hope not representative of some bias when compared to the inclusion of that requirement in my clients' project in 1988. Chili's failure to. iomplete this portion of the sidewalk/landscape plan reflects adversely and has a negative hnpact on the neighborhood and my clients' property. It should also be noted that Chili's at that time was p~uittcd by thc City of Cupertino to construct a new buildlng on the property linc common with my clients' property without any s~tback. In subsequent years my clients have conferred with thc City of Cupertino Planning Officials about possible projects on their property, the o/~cials have insisted on my clients to provide for a set back from 10 to 20 feet. This lack of consistency is now occ'un'ing again. The Biltmore Apartments to the south (rear) of my clients' property are in the process of new construction with less than a 5 foot setback from my clients property and also does not appear to meet a 45 degree day light plane. I feel that it would be in the best interest of all parties if we could meet to discuss the foregoing issues prior to any planning Commission hearing on the parking use of the rear parcel. In any event, because of a medical procedure scheduled for October 23, 2000, I have been advised that it would not be prudent to schedule any meetings for that evening. Mr. Schmidt also has a civil trail in Reno that would conflict with that date. Therefore, we respectfully request that the scheduled hearing be taken offcalend~r until we can discuss all of the above and at time set a new hearing date. Thank you in advance for your anticipated courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Dell R. Ausland DRA:me City of Cu~rtino of Co~unity Develo~ent Department0300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 -- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO wILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE HATTER DESCRIBED BELOW: Application No.(s)= 09-U-01~ APN 369-03-004 Applicant~ Diversified Property Group/Gary Schmidt Location~ 10071 S. Blaney Avenue Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 09-U-01, regarding a use permit for the continued use of a shopping center parking lot for car storage at 10071 S. Blaney Avenue THE MEETING TIME THAT SAID APPLICATION WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BEGIN AT: 6~45 P.M. ON Monday, December 3rd, 2001 The time this item will be heard on the agenda can not be predicted. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS INTERESTED THEREIN MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD ON. SAID MATTER. THE AGENDA FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE FRIDAY AFTERNOON PRECEDING THE MEETING. IF YOU CHALLENGE THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL IN COURT, You HAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING. NOTE: ITEM MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. IF INTERESTED IN AN ITEM, PLEASE CALL PRIOR TO MEETING DATE TO VERIFY IF APPLICATION IS STILL ON THE AGENDA. NOTE TO OWNERS OF RECORD: Notice to tenants is the responsibility of owners. Klm Smith City Clerk City i APPLICATION FORM Of Commm~.iB' D~'¢lopm~mt D~ t~ent C up ergo ,mm To~ Av~u, (4~)m-~ Cup~, CA 95014 F~ (~) ~-~ ~'A Land Use ~ Parcel $1ze Net ~2~aO 0 G~ ~O Ne ~ Dwe~ U~ ~ D~i~ per ~ Buil~g Squ~ Foo~ge Moor ~a ~o (F~) Building H~t Paring H~di~pped Hou~ of Opera,on - Number of Employees or p~m~ Prope~ Si~a~ / Date ~ File,(s). E.A., ~.. Preheating ERC PC CC B. Act Confe~nce October 31,199~ CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone (408) 777-3256 F~x (408) 777=3175 CITY OF CUPFI INO Code Enforcement Office SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM NO. I~) MEETING DATE: January 7, 2002 SUBJECT Public nuisance abatement: Public hearing to consider abating a public nuisance (vacant lot containing an accumulation of trash and debris) at 10200 Stem Avenue (APN 375 12 002, Patrick W. McGrath property owner). BACKGROUND Chapter 9.22 of the Cupertino Municipal Code establishes minimum standards regarding property maintenance. This chapter requires property owners to keep their property free of blighting or -- deteriorating influences or conditions that contribute to the downgrading of neighborhood aesthetics and property values. On August 31, 2001 a complaint was received regarding the condition of a vacant lot at 10200 Stem Ave. This lot was subject to a similar complaint in June of 2000. Violations were corrected by the absentee landowner just prior to going before the City Council. It was reported that currently there is an accumulation of trash, dog feces in plastic bags, abandoned car parts, other debris and a partially dismantled shed on the property. On September 4, 2001 I inspected the property and found it was exactly as reported. On September 5, 2001 I sent a letter to the property owner. In the letter, I gave the owner until September 20, 2001 to clean up the property. Based on the past ease in June 2000, I sent the letter to three known addresses we have found for the owner. Exhibit #1 These letters were sent to the property owner at 550 Balsam Ave., Sunnyvale and On September 14, 2001 two copies of my letter were returned by the Post Office. to P.O. box 2422, Palo Alto. On September 27, 2001 I inspected the property and found no change in conditions. On September 28, 2001 I sent second notice letters to the three known addresses again. In the letter, I gave the owner until October 10, 2001 to clean up the property. Exhibit #2 On October 10, 2001 I inspected the property and found no change in conditions. I installed a "No Dumping" sign on a City owned tree at the edge of the property.. On October 11, 2001 I sent final notice letter to the owner at 1572 Quebec Ct. g4, Sunnyvale, which is the only known address that mail has not been returned by the Post Office. I gave the owner until October 23, 2001 to clean up the property. This letter was sent via Certified mail. Exhibit #3 On October 30, 2001 I inspected the property and found no change in conditions. On November 13, 2001 I inspected the property and found no change in conditions. Digital photos were taken of the property and printed for review by Supervisor. On December 3, 2001 the City Council passed Resolution number 01-250 declaring their intent to conduct a Public Hearing regarding the property. On December 7, 2001 The Notice of Hearing to Abate and Resolution number 01-250 were posted on the property by Code Enforcement Officer Wykoff. Said notices were then mailed to the property owner via certified and regular mail. Exhibit g4 and Exhibit #5 On January 3, 2002 1 inspected the property. The "No Dumping" sign and all abatement notices have been removed from the City owned tree at the edge of the property. No other changes in the conditions were noted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has made every attempt to contact the property owner and have him clean up the property. This is a recurrence of a similar problem in June 2000. The violation in June of 2000 was only cleaned up after many months and many staff hours spent. The property owner was very evasive during the past investigation. To date, the property owner has yet to contact staff regarding our most recent violation letters. Based on the fact that the property owner is uncooperative and the violation has reoccurred, it is the staff recommendation that the City Council declare the storage of trash/debris, car parts, dog feces and the dismantled shed at 10200 Stem Ave. a public nuisance; and furthermore, that the property owner be ordered to permanently abate said nuisance by January 20, 2002 or City Staffwill have said items removed and all costs of this action assessed to the property owner. Staffalso asks that the City Council order the property owner to maintain the property in the future to avoid a recurring public nuisance. Submitted by: Approved for submission to the City Council: Gary t David W. Knapp Code Enforcement Officer City Manager Cfly of Cupertino Code ~nf'o~T.~ment Of~e ~ ' 103~ TO~ Ave. CI~ Of Cu~nino, Ca 95014 September 5, 2001 Patrick McGrath P.O. Box 2422 "· Palo Alto, Ca 94309 To whom it may concern, t I have received a complaint regarding the condition of your property located at 10200 Stern Ave., Cupertino. I have observed that you have an accumulation of trash, discarded vehicle seats and a partial storage shed on the property. These items am all visible from the Public Right of Way. The storage of these items is contrary to the City Prop~ty Maintenance Ordinance and thus a violation of the M~-ficipal Code. Please remove all _. items referenced above prior to my next inspection on September 20, 2001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Please .call me at (408) 777-3256 should you have any questions. Sinc~fly, Gary Kornahrens Code Enforcement Officer City of Cupertino Code Enforcement Office 10300 Torte Ave. CITY OF Cupertino, ca 95014 CUPE INO (405) 777.3182 or (408) 777.3175 Fax September 28, 2001 Patrick McOrath P.O. Box 2422 ; "· Palo Alto. Ca 94309 Second Notice To whom it may concern, I have received a complaint regarding the condition of your property located at 10200 Stern Ave., Cupertino. I have observed that you have, am accumulation of trash, discarded vehicle seats and a partial shed on the prol~rty. These items are all visible from the Public Right of Way. The storage of these items is contrary to the City Property Maintenance Ordinance and thus a violation of the Municipal Code. Please remove all items referenced above prior to my next inspection on October 10, 2001. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Please call me at (408) 777-3256' should you have any questions. Sincerely. Gary Kornahrens Code Enforcement Officer cc. Property Owner Prfnte~ an Recycled Paper September 28, 2001 Patr:ck McGrath 1 $72 Quebec Ct. #4 Sunnyvale, Ca 94087 Final Notice Sent via Certified Mail To whom it may concern, I have received a complaint regarding the condition of your property located at 10200 Stem Ave., Cupertino. I have observed that you have am accumulation of trash, discarded vehicle seats and a partial shed on the property. These items arc all visible from thc Public Right of Way. Thc storage of these items is contrary to thc City Property Maintenance Ordinance and thus a violation of the Municipal Code. Please remove all -- items referenced above prior to my next inspection on October 23, 200J. This letter serves as final notice. If this violation is not con'ected prior to my next inspection, Nuisance Abatement proceedings will commence. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Please call me at (408) 777-3256 should you have any questions. Sincerely, GaD' Komah~ens Code Enforcement Officer State of California ) County of Santa Clara ) ss. City of Cupertino ) I, Kimberly Smith, City Clerk of the City of Cupertino, hereby certify the foregoing document to be a true and correct copy of Resolution NO. 01-250, adopt~l by the Cupertino City Council on December 4, 2001, the original of which is on file in the Cupertino City Clerk's Office Date city RESOLUTION NO. 02-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIiF~ CITY OF CUPERTINO ORDERING ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 10200 STERN AVENUE I~CITALS: (a) On Decrauber 3, 2001, the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopted its Resolution No. 01-250 (attached) declaring a public nuisance at 10200 Stem Avenue because of an accumulation of trash and debris. (b) Pursuant thereto, thc City Council of the City of Cupertino held a hearing with on January 7, 2002, at 6:45 p.m., in the Council Chambers, in the City Hall, located at 10300 Torte Avenue; (c) Thc following members of the City Council were present: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, and Sandoval. (d) The following membcrs of the City's staff, among others, were present: '-' Director of Administrative Services Carol Atwood, City Clerk Kiw~berly Smith; and City Attorney Charles Kilian (e) The following interested persons were also present: (0 After hearing opening remarks, the City Council heard and considered all relevant evidence including, but not limited to, testimony under oath from owners, witnesses and parties interested, as well as received into evidence exhibits and staff reports, relative to said matter; (g) Following the presentation of all evidence and closing ~omarks, the City Council considered the matter, and resolved as follows: 1. The following findings of fact are hereby made: (a) Notice of the time and place of the hcaring to abate, and Resolution No. 01-250 were duly and regularly posted and served, as required by the provisions of Ordinance No. 1793, Chapter 1.09.060 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. -- Co) The accumulation of debris/~rash and other materials stored on parcel 375-12-002 located at 10200 Stem Avenue in the City of Cupertino, State of Resolution No. 02-008 Page 2 California, constitutes a public nuisance, in that said storage constitutes a hazard to public health, safety and general welfare, by reason of threatening the free use and enjoyment of adjoining property. 2. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: (a) Said public nuisance shall be abated. (b) A description of the needed corrections and/or repairs, necessary to comply with the abate,.,ent order is as follows: · Reiiiovai of accumulation of debris/trash and other materials at 10200 Stem Avenue by January 20, 2002. (c) Any propezx'y owner shall have the fight to have the public nuisance, as declared, abated, provided the sarae is completed as per Item 2Co) of this Resolution, which time, upon good cause shown, may be extended for a reasonable time by the City Council. (d) If such public nuisance is not abated within such time or any extension of time that may be granted, the Director of Administrative Services shall, by City forces or private con'tract, cause the same to be abated. (e) The property owner shall continue to maintain the property in such a way as to avoid a recurring public nuisance. ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this day of January, 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVF. LOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: 01-MCA-01 Agenda Date: January 7, 2002 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Application Summary: Consideration of a Municipal Code.^mendment revising Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures in single-family zones as may be needed to prevent conslruction of "illegal" second dwelling units, and to ensure that accessory sll~lctures are subordinate to principal swactures in single-family zones. RECOMM~.NDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: · Approve smeudments to Chapter 19.08 Defini~ion~ and Chapter 19.80 Accessory BuiMings/Structures based on the Model OiYl~inance attached as Exhibit A; and · Authorize staff to make modifications, within the next six months, to the Second Dwelling -- Unit Ordinance to encourage the building of second units as recommended in the Housing Element and the Planning Commission minute order (dated December 10, 2001). BACKGROUND The COmlD!mity Development Department has received several building permit applications for accessory buildings such as pool houses and guest cottages in R-1 (Single Family Residential) and RI-IS (Residential Hillside) zones that include habi~hle space, bathrooms and wet bars. In reviewing these applications, staff has discovered a lack of clarity of "dwelling unit" in the ordinance. This has resulted in the construction of pool houses with full baths and wet bars that have the potential to be used as "illegal" units, that do not meet the requirements of Chapter 19.84 Second lhvelling Units (attached). Additionally, in reviewing Chapter 19.80Accessory Buildings/Structures, staff identified loopholes in the ordinance that allow accessory buildings/ structures in single-family residential zones that are larger than the principal structure. Staff brought forward modifications to Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures at a planning Commission public hearing on November 26, 2001..The planning Commission approved the modifications with some revisions on December 10, 2001. II-I Consideration of a Municipal Code Ameodm~nt r~vising Chapt~ 19.08 and Chapter 19.80 January 7, 2002 Page 2 DISCUSSION Following are the ordinance changes recommended for approval by the Planning Commission: l'l'l,~l ()ltl)IN\',,('l,~i~\~(;[ \(;I,i I,~I,~\~()N "Kitchen" "An area, in living space, for the preparation Helps to define a of food that includes at least three of the "dwelling unit." following: counters, refrigerator, sink, and/or cooking appliance (or provisions for a cooking appliance such as 220V outlets, separate gas connection, space for appliances between counters, etc.)." "Habit~oble Space" "Space in a structure for living, sleeping, Referenced in Chapter eating or coolring. Bathrooms, toilet 19.08 in definition of compartment, closets, halls, storage or utility "kitchen" and "living space, and similar areas are not considered space." habitable space." "Living Space" "Habitable space and sanitation." Referenced in Chapter 19.80 for accessory buildings that include "habitable space" and bathrooms. "Second Dwel]ing "An attached or a detached residential Required because it is not Unit" dwelllr~g unit which provides complete currently del'reed in the independent living facilities for one or more ordinance. persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooirin~, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated." Delete "accessory Not required because all dwelling" and accessory buildings with "guest cottage" "living space" will be required to confo.,- to Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. · ~ ', '-l~'~-.~',~:-~.r.~.,~!i~.. ~,.' .... ~, "-'*? . !' r~ ....... · ...... ......~ .......... . ...... ~ ......... · ........ ,,,.... ,~.. ~~., ....... ~. ............ . ........... ...~,.,,.~,~¥~ I.imit size of The area of an accessory building/structure, Accessory buildings accessory structures not inclurling garage space, shall be limited required to be to maximum to the gross building area as per Section subordinate to principal ' allowed for second 19.84.030D. structure. Can be units converted to second unit that does not exceed max. size allowed. Reduces Consideration of a Municipal Code Amendment revising Chapter 19.08 and Chapter 19.80 January 7, 2002 Page 3 Detached accessory Detached accessory buildings with living Accessory buildings buildin,gs with space shall conform to Chapter 19.84, required to be living space subordinate to principal conform to Chapter .structure. Can be 19.84 convex*ed to second unit that does not exceed max. size allowed. Reduces visual and traffic impacts. Include basements Basements in accessory buildlngs/stmctures Accessory buildings in FAR for shall count as floor area. Basement required to bc accessory bnildings lightwe]Js shall conform to Section subordinate to principal 19.28,060F. structure. Reduces visual and traffic impacts. Staff Prouosed Revision to Ordinance Chan~es Auuroved bv the Plannim, Comm[z~ion As indicated in the matrix, the Planning Commission approved the following definition for kitchen: "An area, in living space, for the preparation of food that includes at least three of the following; counters, refrigerator, sink, and/or cooking appliance (or provision~ for a cooking appliance such as 220V outlets, separate gas connection, space for appliances between counters, etc.)." However, the Planning Commission approved a revised definition for Uving space as follows: "Living space is habitable space and sanitation." Therefore, to ensure that sanitation is not a requirement for an area to be defined as a kitchen, staff proposes to revise the definition of a kitchen as foUows: "An area, in living spacc habitable space, for the preparation of food that includes at least three of the following; counters, refrigerator, sink, and/or cooking appliance (or provisions for a cooking appliance such as 220V outlets, separate gas connection, space for appliances between counters, etc.)." Prom~! Proc~* for Future Auolicatiom · Projects that meet all ordinance regulations will only require a building permit. · Applicants who propose dc!ached accessory buildings with Uving space will need to comply '- with Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. Consideration of a Municipal Code Amendment revising Chapter 19.08 and Chapter 19.80 January 7, 2002 · Applicants who propose detached accessory buildings larger than 640 square feet (excluding garage space) would be required to apply for a variance as per Chapter 19.124. Modifications to the Second Unit Ordinance In addition to the recommendation for approval of the proposed ordinance changes, the Commission passed a minute order (attached) on December 10, 2001, recommevdlng that thc City Council authorize staff to make modifications to the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance, within the next six months, to encourage the building of second units. The following recommendations were included in the minute order:. · Consider increasing the maximum size of second dwelling units from the current 640 square feet to a range of 800-1200 square feet on a sliding scale, based on the lot size. · Use the AARP (American Association of Retired Persons) Model Ordinance as a guide. Steve Pi~ki, Director of David W. Irmapp, City Manager Commullity l~velopm~nt Attachments Exhibit A: Model Ordinance No. 1891 Exhibit B: Planning Commission Resolution 6118 Recommending that the City Council Amend Chapters 19.08 and 19.80 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. Exhibit C: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6120 (~inute Order) Recommending that the City Council Authorize Staff to make Modifications to the Second Unit O/~qinance. Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance Planning Commission staff report, November 26, 2001 Planning Commission staff report, December 10, 2001 G flPlanain~PDRF. POR'l~cMCArepor~01 -MCA-010 f..C.doc Exhibit A ORDINANCE NO. 1891 AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIl- OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO A1V~NDING CHAP'rER 19.08, DEFINITIONS AND CHAPTER 19.80 ACCESSORY STRUCtURES/BUn.DINGS OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING DEFINITIONS AND RELATED TO ACCESSORY Bun.r)INGS/ STRUCTURES AND SECOND DWI=].!.ING UNITS IN SING!-g-FAM11.Y ZONES. WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to prevent construction of "illegal" second dwelling units in single-family zones; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to ensure that' accessory buildings/structures are subordinate to principal structures in s'mgle=fnmily zones; NOW, Tt/F_2,EFORE, BE rr ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: Proposed text is underlinea~ Deleted text is struck through. Chapter 19.08 of the Municipal Code of Cupertino is hereby amended to read as follows; DI~.IRN1TIONS "Aoeoaoory dwolllng" moan~ n dwolllng unit inoidontnl to a prinoipnl u~o on n aitc and -- intended for occupancy by persona residing there'm by re/~on of employment of one or more oecopnnt~ on tho same site. "Guest cottage" menn~ an ncoessory bui~dlng containing n lodging unit without kitchen facilities and ~ to house oeensional visitor~ or nonpaying gucnts of tho oeeupants of n dwelling unit'on tho aamc sitc. "Habitable space" means space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating or cooking, Bathrooms, toilet compartment, closets, halls, storage or utility space, and similar areas are not considered habitable space. "Living space" mesns habitable space and sanitation. "Kitchen" means au area in habitable space used for the preparation of food and including at least three of the following: 1. Cooking applianceCs~ or provision for a cooki~ appliance Csuch as 220V outlets, gas connections and space for appliances between counters: 3. Refrigerator. 4. Sink, "Second dwelling unit" means an attached or a det~gehed residential dwelling unit Ordinance No. 1891 Cupertino City Council Page 2 which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include pe~umnent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated. Chapter 19.80 of the Municipal Code of Cupertino is hereby amended to read as follows: ACCESSORY BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES 19.80.030 Site Development Regulations B. Residential and Agricultural Zones. 2. With respect to detached accessory buildings/structures (including an R2 zoning district): a. In RI. RHS. A and A1 zones: i. The area of an accessory building/structure, not including garage space, shall be limited to the gross building area as per Section 19.84.030D. ii. Basements in accessory buildings/structures shall count as floor area. Basement lightwells shall conform to Section 19.28.060F. iii. Detached accessory buildings with living space shall confo,u to Chapter 19.84. ~ b. The maximum lot coverage is thirty percent of the useable rear yard area. ~ c. The minimum distance from a principal dwelling is five feet (measured between the eaves); ~.. d_. Small, portable storage buildings less than six feet in height, which are not attached to a building, permanent foundation, or pad, may be located closer than five feet to a principal dwelling, but no closer than three feet from any property line; d:. e_. No detached accessory building or structure shall be located less than three feet from any property line, er. f. Detached accessory buildings and structures shall be limited to a single story and shall not exceed a height of seven feet beginning at a three-foot.setback from rear or side property lines. The height encompasses the entire wall plane nearest the property line, including the roof, eaves, and any portion of the foundation visible above the adjoining finished grade. The wall plane height may be increased by one foot for each additional one and one-half feet of setback (corresponding to a thirty- three-degree angle), up to a maximum wall plane height of fifteen feet, as depicted in the diagram attached to thc ordinance codified in this title. Thc maximum height of construction shall not exceed twenty feet-; ~.. ~. Walls which are less than five feet to a property llne may not have windows or if windows are installed they must be obscured glass or have the sill height above five Ordinance No. 1891 Cupertino City Council Page 3 feet from the floor. This requirement shall not apply to skylight or windows which face a right=of-way or a nonresidential zoning district. h. Detached recreational buiidings/stmamr~s, which have a floor or step height greater than eighte~.n inches above any point at the adjoining f~ished grade, must have a setback of ten feet from any property. An affixed play structure, such as a swing or climbing apparatus, is allowed in the setback area if it is at least three feet from the property line and if it excc. c~ the heights and setbacks as required in subsections B2b and c of this section and meets one of the two following conditions: It is adjacent to a corner property line, or if not on a comer, the immediately adjacent property owner agrees to the location prior to construction, i_. The minimum front-yard setbacks for detached accessory buildings/structures are: i. Twenty feet in residential zones, ii. Thirty feet in agricultural zones, ~. With respect to corner lots, the street-side yard setback must he no less than f'tfteen feet and no less than twenty feet in the event that the comer lot is adjacent to a key lot, k. In R-2 and R-3 zones, in the case of an interior lot abutting only one street, no detached accessory building or structure, except a detached garage, may occupy the front fifty percent of the lot area. Ordinance No. 1891 C'upcr~o City Council Page 4 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of January, 2002, and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of January, 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino EXtlmlT B 01-MCA-01 CrrY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6118 OF TH]/PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF CUPERTINO RECOMM~.NDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMF-ND CHAFrERS 19.08 AND 19.80 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING DEFINITIONS l~h-~ ATING TO ACCESSORY BUII.DINGS/STRUCTURES AND SECOND DW~.I I .rNG UNITS. Recommendation of appwval is based on Exhibit A as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED this l0ta day of December 2001 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following mil call vote: .-. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Pamoe, Chen, Auerbach and Chairperson Corr NOES: · COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVF. D: /s/Steve Piasecki /s/Charles Corr Steve Piasecki Charles Corr, Chairperson Director of Commnnlty Development Planning Commission EXHIBIT C O1-MCA-OI CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION 6120 (MINUTE ORDER) OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORr~:. STAFF TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO TI~ SECOND DWRILING UNIT ORDINANCE. The p]snnlng Commission of the City of Cupertino recommends that the City Council authorize staff to make modifications withi~ the next six months to the Second Dwelliug Unit Ordinance to encourage the building of second units with the following suggestions: · Consider increasing the maximum size of second dwelling units from the current 640 square feet to a range of 800-1200 square feet on a sliding scale and based on the lot size. · Use the AARP (American Association of Retired Persons) Model O~inance as a guide for changes. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~' day of December 2001 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMI.~SIONERS: Patnoe, Chen, Auerbach and Chairperson Corr NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATrEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki /s/Charles Corr Steve Piasecki Charles Corr, Cbslrperson Director of Community Development Planning Commission II-I0 19.84.010 Clmpter 19.84 C. AU ac:ceases m secondary uuiu shall bc scree:mi titan a public SECOND DWEI,I,~G UNITS IN R-l, pR.q, D. The gross building azea of a secm]d dwelling A, AND A-1 ZONES unit slmll not exceed six hundred for~ square feet of living space, exclusive of decks and prqes. 19.84.010 Purpese. omi ,mi~ shall not exceed forty petcmt of the 19~L020 Applicability or rek~htio~ lm ar~ exce~ ~.* in ~ zones lot covmge of 19~4.030 Site development roBulntions, all s13'ucmres shall no~ exceed yhh-~ per-'ant O~ 19.~L050 Occ~. F. A sec~d dw~111~ unit may be lo~?,a on a 1924.070 'Noncoafo,...I.~miilk~l 1. En~ to the secomi dwelling tmit is not ~/o. 1924,010 ~ Developm~, ~be s~md mit does m reml~ in of aif~,4~kle ho~.= wifl/n tbe Ci~ ~,h pm- 3. h is mnclmi m ~ laimary ~ (O~ vision cf ,ddifim~d. housing in certain msidon,~l 1811 (pan), 1999;. OgL 1601 F. xh. A (.lm,-t), 1992) whichmln|m;~:~ldv~'~e;mla, e~sm~. In liddilio~l ~o t~. plrldn_e z~,.l.,;.G.~.d~ ill t[~ (OrcL 1601 Bxh. A (pan), 1992) applicable z-.,nh,g district for a paflicular lot. cue 19.84.920 ApplkaMlity of r,,~l-iiomt space 0mcovemJ.) shall be provided for ~be second ~c:,~with,~na.~ any ~,,dsio~ of this title mt, be ~ ~ ~, dm rtz ,,~a~.io,,,! space in R-l, RHS, A ami A-1 zo,,;-- distri~:s, provided nity Develepmnlt, dot~;,,,,,,- the :'.,,~t setl:mck atmm dm in addition m cn~. lyin~ ~,iih the si~ de~lop- of ~he lot in such a ,,,-~r as m d,,,,{_~.,,~, tho~ mere z~g~d~ml ipec~r~ in e~ ~ for areas peserved as lmkape space. dw~11ing m. itoh second dwell;ns ,,nit complies sm'faces may not exceed fifty pemcent of the f3ront with ~h~m~fisti°~l~c/l~g~'~;dintM-~c~pll~. (Old- ~ area (See Section IL29.040 Ale). (Ord. 1~01 ~ X (pm), l~) 1601 ~ A (p~X A. Aseconddwelli~unitlccatedmalot con- The owner of a lot which contains a second tbep~wifll except ~n A nrta A-1 zoning ai-~c~s auce ofabu~ding ~ forasecond dw~m,,~ er which can ~tve ti~ second ii unit ~ th~issmmce of any ___~CCUlanCy ~mepermit f~ an ammb~ m' desacbed mp~ll_,~__ of lm ~---= existing seeoud dwp-.~g, the owner shall n~0~d a B. All seea~d dwelliz~ agss d~ll ~,~ dim~ 19.84.050 -- CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 9~014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPM~NT REPORT FORM Application: 01-MCA-01 . Agenda Date: November 26, 2001 ; Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Application Summary: Consideration of a Municipal Code Amendment revising Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures in single-family zones as may be needed to prevent construction of"illegal" second dwelling units, and ensure that accessory structures in single-family zones are subordinate to the use/function of the principal structure in order to reduce visual and traffic impacts in single-family zones. RECOMb~NDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: · Review, comment and provide direction to staff regarding the proposed Municipal Code Amendments. OR if the Planning Commission is satisfied that the proposed ameodments sufficiently address the issues: · Request that thc City Council authorize modifications to ¢/~ter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Building~t~tures based on the Model Ordinance attach~ as Exhibit A. BACKGROUND The Community Development Department has received several building permit applications for additions and accessory buildings with habitable space such as, pool houses and guest cottages, in R-I (Single Family Residential) and RHS (Residential Hillside) zones that include habitable space, bathrooms and '`wet bars". In reviewing these applications, staff has discovered a lack of clarification of "dwelling unit" and "guest cottage" in the ordinance. The Municipal Code defines a "dwelling nnlt" as having one "kitchen" and prohibits "kitchen facilities" in guest cottages. However, there is no definition of a "kitchen" in the Municipal Code. This has resulted in the construction of additions with habitable space (including pool houses and guest cottages) with full baths and "wet bars" that have the potential to be used as kitchens or converted into full kitchens with very minor changes, often without building permits. These improvements create the potential for "illegal" dwelling units, which do not meet the requirements of the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance, Chapter 19.84 (Exhibit B). Staff, therefore, recommends the following modifications to the Municipal Code to prevent the construction of "fflegal" second dwelling units: = Clarify definition of a "kitchen", '`wet bar" and "habitable space"; and · I.imit the nnmher of plumbing fixtures in accessory buildings with habitable space. i1- $ Consideration of a Muni¢ipa~de Amendment ~evising Chapter 19.08 and C'~er 19.80 November 20, 2001 Page 2 In reviewing Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures, staff also identified loopholes in the ordinance that allow accessory.buildings/structures in single-family residential zones to be effectively larger than the ordinance intends. A provision of the ordinance states that, "accessory uses and facilities ... should be subordinate to the primary activity of the principal use or principal facility ... ", in order to ensure that there are minimal' visual and traffic impac~ in single-family zones. The current ordinance however only limits the accessory structure to the allowed lot coverage and does not include basements in the FAR (floor area ratio) calculations. In some cases, would result in larger accessory structures/buildings than the principal structure and related visual and traffic impacts. Staff therefore recommends the following changes to the ordinance: · Limit size of accessory buildings/structures; and · Include basements in the FAR calculations for accessory slxucmres in single-family zones. DISCUSSION Comuarison Of Reaulafions In Other Cities Staff requested information from jurisdictions in California, including the cities of Sunnyvale, Los Altos, Campbell, Morgan Hi!! and San Rafael, regarding del'tuitions of a dwelling unit, kitchen, and other mechanisms to prevent construction of illegal dwelling units in single-f~mily zones. The following table compares pertinent sections of the Cupertino Municipal Code with regulations used by other cities to prevent construction of illegal dwelling noits: I'l'l,~Xl i CI I'I'~RrI'IN() ('()I)E ()'I'IIER (Till'..", DEFINITIONS Kitchen None. A cooking facility with proximal arrangement of at least two/three or more of storage, refrigerator, sink, cooking appliance, 220V outlets, separate ga~water connections, space for appliances between counte~s, etc. Wet Bar None. (Policy) Wet bars defined to~.limit counter/cabinet space (6 ft. max), number of outlets (1 outlet/6 lin. ft.), 'restricting sink/apphance size and prohibiting specific appliances (stoves, ovens, dishwashers). DETAC~rI~.i~ ACCESSORY BU~'.I~IN~TRUCTURF~ Habitable space Allowed. Not allowed except for second dwelling units by 10etafit. Size Limited to FAR maximum Limited to maximum size allowed for a for lot. second dwelling unit. Number of No limit. Maximum of two/three. Require a plumbing f'uttures conditional use permit for more Consideralion ofa Munioipnl ~ ~o ~m. endm~nt revising Chapter 19.08 and Ct,- '~r 19.~0 November :20, 2001 Page 3 I'1'1:.'~I ('1 ~lq(l~]'lXl) ~1)1}11 : ()Till(P, ('1 I'll(S plumbing fixtures or conformance with second dwellina unit ordinance. Deed restrictions None. Detached accessory buildings w/plumbing fixtures required to record deed restriction stating that the accessory building shall not be used as a dwelling unit. Post construction Code enforcement in Code enforcement, searching rental monltorin~ response to calls from public, advertisements, etc. Criteria For Selectine Reeulaflons Staff used the following criteria in the developing the ordinance modifications: 1. Utilize Existing City Review Procedures- The regulations should be accommodated within existing City review procedures (such as building permits, address requests, planning application review, code enforcement). 2. Consistency with Uniform Building Code = The definitions and regulations should be .-. consistent with Unifo~u Building Code (UBC) requirements. Based on the above rationale, staff developed the following regulations to be added to Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures. Recommended Regulations for Prohibitinf Illegal Second Units Chapter 19.08 De. fl~diiens Define "Kitchen" Since the code currently identifies a dwelling unit as having only one "kitchen", the definition of a "kitchen" would help staff identify when improvements constitute an additional "kitchen" and therefore, a separate dwelling unit. Staff reviewed various city ordinances for t~e definitions of a "kitchen." A m~mber of commlmities defined a "kitchen" as "a facility that contains two (or in some cases) three or more of storage, refrigerator, sink, cooking appliance, 220V outlets, separate gas~ater connections, space for appliances bet~veen counters." Staff developed the definition for a '4',itchen" based on the following discussion: · DelSning a kitchen as containing two of qnnllfying elements (storage, refrigerator, etc.) the above is too restrictive, because in some cases laundry areas (contnlning stora~ and a sink). would be defined as a kitchen. Staff believes thn~ including three or more of the qualifying - elements (such as sink, cooking appliance and refrigerator) would meet the criteria of a kitchen while exempting laundry or workshop areas from qualifying as kitchens. I/-/5 Consideration ora Municipal ~ 'lo Amendment revising Chapter 19.08 and CI' 'er 19.80 November 20, 2001 Page 4 · The inclusion of"habitable space" was necessary in the definition in order to exclude garages containing a laundry area (with storage, sink) and an extra refrigerator from being defined as kitchens. · In many cases, building permit plans do not show a cooking appliance but show provisions for one such as: a gas connection, a 200V outlet or space between counters to hold a stove: Including such features were therefore necessary in defining a kitchen. · Wet bars would be allowed in a~t~ched/detached family rooms and poolrooms but would be limited in terms of size and type of appliances permitted. ~, definition of"wet bar" would be added as well (see below). Based on tho above discussion, staffproposes to adopt a definition for a "kitchen" as "~ area, in habitable space, for the preparut~on of food that includes at least three of; counters, refrigerator, sink, and/ar cooking appliance (or provisions for a cooking appliance such as 220V outlets, separate gas conaection, space for appliances between counters, etc.). Wet bars do not constitute kitchens." Define "Wet Bar" Several building permit applications include detached pool houses and family room additions with "wet bars", While the code does not specifically prohibit ''wet bars" in guest cottages, pool houses and family rooms, it does not permit cooking facilities/kitchens. Staff therefore believes that ''wet bars" should be defined in order to distinguish them from "kitchens." In reviewing ordinances for other communities, staff did not come across a definition of a "wet bar." Some commRnities however, included policies to limit the size of counters, outlets, appliances, and prohibited certain appliances in wet bars. Staff reviewed and included some of these policies in developing a definition for '`wet bars." In order to allow "wet bars" while deterring illegal conversions to "kitchens", staff proposes that the size of storage and appliances in "wet bars" be restricted and that they should be prohibited from incorporating features that are required in kitchens by the I. IBC as follows: · Limit size of cabinets~counters in wet bar area- Staff proposes that cabinets/counters in wet bars should be limited to a maximum of 6 linear feet including sink/appliance area. This would allow space for storage and serving drinks/snacks while making it difficult to add appliances to convert it into a full kitchen. ~ · Limit size of appliances andprohibit certain appliances/features - Staff proposes thot sinks and refrigerators should be limited to a minlmnm sizo (12" li 12" for sinks and 4.3 cu.ft, for refrigerators). In addition, cooking facilities, dishwashers, gas connections, 220V wiring, etc., should be prohibited. · Limit number of electrical outlets- The UBC requires one outlet every 6 linear feet for living areas and one outlet for every 2 linear feet of counter space for kitchens. Staff proposes limiting the number of outlets in wet bars to the minimum re~ulredl one outlet every 6 ft. Consideration of a Municipal c' 4e Amendment revising Chapter 19.08 and Chv.-.~er 19.80 November 20, Pag~ $ Define "Habitable Space" Since the ordlnallce changes refer to "habitable space", staff proposes to use the definition in the UBC, which states that, "Habitable space is space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating or cooking. Bathrooms, toilet compartment, closets, halls, storage or utility space, and similar areas are not considered habitable space." However, while the UBC, specifically excludes hallways, closets, bathrooms, and storage/utility space from the definition of "habitable space", staff does not propose to exclude them because these areas would be no~mally be part of the living space. Staff therefore proposes to amend the definition to add bathrooms and to remove the exclusion. The new definition would therefore read as, "habitable space is space in a structure for ]iving, sleeping, eating, cooking or sanitation." Cha~ter 19.80 Accessory Buiidines/ Structures Limit Plumbing Fixtures in Habitable Space Staff also recommends modifications to Chapter 19.80 Accessory l~uildings~trucmres to ensure that detached acoessory buildings/structures with habitable space (including pool houses and guest cottages) in R1, RHS, A and A-1 zones are limited to three plumbing fixtures. This would allow guest cottages and pool houses with a half-bath and a "wet bar", a full bath and no "wet bar" or a detached garage with a laundry and sink, However, full baths and "wet bars" would not be allowed in detached accessory building/structures, since they could be easily converted to second units without building permits. Detached accessory bnildings/stmctures with habitable space and more than three plumbing fixtures would be required to conform to Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. Reeulations Considered but not Recommended Deed Restriction for Detached Accessory Structures with Habitable Space A number of communities require a deed restriction for detached accessory buildings with habitable space stating that the building will not be used as a second unit (unless permits are obtained in accordance with the second dwelling unit ordinance) to alert future property owuers that the accessory building is not a second ,nit. Staff felt that the new regulations ',~ proposed were adequate to prohibit illegal conversions to second units. Therefore, the deed restriction requirement was not included. Recommended Renulafions for Sin~le-Familv Residential Zones to Ensure That Aecessorv Structures are Subordinate to the Princiual Use Or Fadlitv Chapter 19.80 Accessory Building~Stmctures Limit Size of Accessory Buildings/Structures in Single Family Residential Zones Most communities, including Cupertino, limit the si~_e of a second dwelling unit in single- family zones (currently 640 square feet in Cupertino). A number of communities additionally Consideration of a Municipal ~' 4e Amendment revising Chapter 19.08 andCh~-.er 19.80 November 20, 2001 Page 6 limit the size of "habitable space" in nccessory structures in single-fnmily zones to the mnximum size of a second dwelling unit. Currently in Cupertino, the size of an accessory buiJding/strucmre is limited to the amount of floor area ratio (NAR) available on the site after deducting the primary residence and gnr'age. Pool houses and guest cottages are therefore allowed to exceed the maximum size allowed for a second dwelling .nit and, in some cases, even the area of the primary residence. This is contrary to one of the provisions in Chapter 19.80 which states that "Accessory uses and facilities.., should be subordinate to the primary activity of the principal use or principal facility ..." Staff therefore proposes that accessory det__n_ched buildings should be limited to the maxlmnm Unit size allowed in the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinallce. Crarages would not be included in the FAR calculations since they are not "habitable space." The ordinance change would have the following advantages: · It would ensure that the structure is subordinate to the primary single-family residence and has minimum impacts (traffic, parking, visual, etc.) on the neighborhood. · It would remove the incentive for applicants to build a large "pool house" with a "wet bar" and illegally convert it into a non-conforming second unit. · If a resident decides to convert a guesthonse or pool house into a second dwelling unit, he/she would not be prevented from doing so because the size of the "habitable space" exceeds the maximum for a second dwelling unit. Include Basements in FAR for Accessory Structures in Single Family Zones In keeping with the purpose of ensuring that accessory buildings are subordinate to the principal use or principal facility, staff proposes an additional modification to Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures to limit the size of basements in detached accessory buildings/strnctures. While the code limits detached accessory buildings (including detached second dwelling units) to a single story, fully submerged basements in these structures are currently exempted from FAR calculations. Staff is concerned that exempting basements from FAR calculations in detached accessory structures may have the following consequences: 1. Accessory structures with basements would no longer be "subordinate" to the primary structure in terms of size. Also, in cases where both the primary structure and the accessory structure have full basements, the effective FAR of the lot could be exceeded by as much as 100%. 2. As indicated above, second dwelling units in single-family zones are currently limited to 640 square feet to ensure that the second unit is subordinate to the primary residence and minlmiTes adverse impacts to neighborhoods. If bas6ments are built in detached second ~mits, they could potentially be converted to habitable space and effectively result in units larger than the maximum size allowed by code. Staff therefore proposes a modification to the code to include basements in detached accessory structures/buildings in the FAR calculations for single-family zones. Detached second dwelling units would be subject to the same regulations since they are required to conform to Section 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures. II-/ Consideration of a Municipal C' 4e Ame. ndmcnt mvi$1n$ Chapter 19.08 and Ch~-' .~ 19.80 November 20, 2001 Pag~ 7 Prouosed Process 1. Projects that meet all ordinance regulations will not require additional approvals. 2. Applicants who propose detached accessory structures with mom than 3 plumbing fixtures will nell to comply with Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. ' 3. Applicants who propose detached accessory buildings larger than 640 sq.ft. (excluding · . garage space) would be required to apply for a Variance as per Chapter 19.124. Sununarv Given the complexity of the issues, staff has brought this forward to the plnnning Commission for review, comment and to provide direction to staff regarding thc proposed ordinance changes, If the Phmning Commission is satisfied that the issues have been sufficiently addressed in the proposed code sm-.ndments, it may request that the City Council approve the amendments to Chapter 19.08 Defnitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures based on the Model Ordinance (Exhibit A) with or without revisions. In the event that the Planning Commission feels that the issues need further cli.v:ussion, staff will come back at a later date with proposed am~'.ndments based on the Commission's direction. Prepared by: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Plnnner ' n~--''A't~~_ Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme Attnclunents Model Resolution Exhibit A: Model Ordinance Exhibit B: Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance G:~lanning~PDKEPOR~CAmpor tsV) 1 -MCA-OI .doc /I-I CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 9~014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: 01-MCA-01, Agenda Date: December 10, 2001 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Application Summary: Consideration of a Municipal Code Amevdment revising Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures in single-family zones as may be n~..ded to prevent conswacfion of '~.liegal' second dwelling units, and ensure that accessory structures in single-family zones are subordinate to the use/function of the principal structure in order to reduce visual and traffic impacts in single-family zones. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the planning Commission: · Request that the City Council authorize modifications to Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures'based on the Model Ordinance attached as Exhibit A. BACKGROUND At the Planning Commission meeting on November 26, 2001, staff brought forward the following modifications to revising Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures to prevent construction of "illegal" second dwelling units and to ensure that accessory structures are subordinate to principal structures in single-family zones: · Define "kitchen," "wet barf' and "habitable space"; · IJrnit the number of plumbing fixtures in accessory buildings with habitsble space. · Limit size of accessory buildings/structures; and · Include basements in the FAR calculations for accessory structures in single-family zones. At that time various members of the Planning Commission had the following comments: · The proposed modifications were prescriptive and unnecessary; · The modifications would make it more difficult to build second units; · The modifications should be combined with changes to the second nnlt ordinance (proposed. as part of the C-cneral Plan Housing Element); and · staff should get input from applicants for poolhouses/guest cottages in order to get their perspective on the issue. The Commission voted to continue the item to the meeting of December 10, 2001. Comidmttion of a Municipal r '7 An~ndn~nt ~visin~ Chapt~ 19.08 and ~ ',-r 1930 El~smb~r 5, 2001 Page 2 DISCUSSION Staff has the following recommendations regarding the Commission's comments: · The proposed modifications are necessary in order to clarify the ordinance and to pwvide adequate direction to staff and applicants; · While the second unit ordinance is a work item for next year, it is necessary to make the proposed ordinance modifications as soon as possible. In keeping with the comments from the Planning Commission, staff contacted two applicants for their input on the issue. Staff will forward their comments to the Planning Commission as soon as they ltre received. Also, in response to the Commission's comments, staff has made chan~es to the earlier proposed ordinance modifications as discussed below. Recommended MedHications to C~er 19.lM Dei~iti~ns Define "Kitchen" Staff feels that since the code identifies a dwelling unit as having only one "ldtchen", the definition of a '~dtchen" is necessary to help identify whe, n improvements constitute an additional "kitchen" and therefore, a separate dwelling unit. Staff therefore proposes to move forward with the proposed definition modified as follows: "Kitchen means an area, in habitablc livine space, for the preparation of food that includes at least three of; counters, refrigerator, sink, and/or cooking appliance (or provisions for a cooking appliance such a~ 220V outlets, separate gaz connection, space for appliances between counters, etc.). W~t bars do not constitutc kiwlwns." Define "Wet Bar" Staff had felt earlic~ flint "wet bars" should be defined in order to distinguish them from "kitchens." In response to the Commission's comments that the definitions were too prescriptive and that they would complicate the ordinance, stuff proposes to exclude the definition for "wet bars." Define "Living Space" The previous ordinance changes had included a definition for the "habitable space", which modified the UBC (Unifotai Building Code) definition for the same. Some members of the Commission felt th~! definitions should stay consistent with the UBC without any modifications. Staff therefore proposes to replace the te,a "habitable space" with "living s_~ace" and to define it as follows: ._ "Living space means space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating, cookin8 or sanitation." Co~idera~on~aMunicip~~ %Ame~me~visi~Clmpt~rlg.~nndCh--'erlg.80 DecemberS, 2~l P~e3 Delete Definition of Accessory Dwelling and Guest Cottage The code includes definitions for "accessory dwelling" and "guest cottage" separately from a "second dwelling unit". These define living quarters for the employees or guests of the principal residence who do not pay rent for the unit. Since the'proposed code modifications require all accessory buildings with "living space" conform to thc second unit ordinance (discussed later in this report), the above definitions would no longer be necessary or pertinent. Staff therefore pwposes to delete these definitions and add a de6nifion for second dwelling unit ns discussed below. Define "Second Dwelling Unit" While the code has a chapter on "second dwelling units", it does not include a definition for the same. Also ns stated earlier, staff proposes to eliminate definitions of accessory dwelling and guest cottage and require accessory buildings with "living space" conform to the second unit ordinance. Therefore, staff proposes to include a definition for second dwelling unit which consistent with the definition in the California Government Code ns follows: "Second dwelling unit, means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include pe~ianent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated." Recommended Modifications to Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buiidintts/Stmctures Staff had recommended thc following modifications to Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/ Structures: 1. !.imit the number of plumbing fixtures in detachcd accessory buildings with living space to a maximum of three. If more than three plumbing fixtures were proposed, the project would be required to conform to Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. 2. I.imit the size of accessory buildings to the maximum unit size nllowed in the second nnit ordinance (currently 640 sq.ft, in Cupertino) for the followi.ng reasons: · To ensure that the structure is subordinate to the primary single-family residence and has rniniml~m impacts on the neighborhood. ·To remove the incentive for applicants to build a large "pool house" with a "wet bar" and illegally convert it into a non-confol',x~ing second unit. · If a resident decided to convert a guesthouse or pool house into a second dwelling unit,, he/she would'not be prevented from doing so because the size of the "living space" exceeded the maximum for a second dwelling unit. 3. Include basements in the FAR maximum (size allowed by the second unit Ordinance) .for accessory bui]dln~stmctures in single family zones for the following reasons: ·To ensure that the effective size of accessory structures with basements are subordinate to the size ora prlmnry structure. · Basements in detached second ~mits could potentially be converted to living space and effectively result in units larger than the maximum size allowed by code. Considoratlon of a Municipal ~ *e Arnen(~mont rev~siilg Chapter 19.08 and Ch' '~r 19.80 ~ $, 2001 Page 4 Some members of the Commission felt that the above regulations were too prescriptive and should be strenmllned. So~le also felt that basements in accessory structures should not be included in the FAR since they did not add to the bulk or volume of the accessory structure. Staff therefore proposes the following: 1. F. limln:~te the Plumbing Fixture l.lmit for Accessory Blli]dings. 2. Require that all Detached Accessory Buildings with "Living Space" be required to conform to Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. 3. Retain Proposed Modifications to Include Basements in FAR for Accessory Structures in Single Fmnily Zones - Even though basements do not si~tmificantly add to the bulk or volume of an accessory building/s~.~, staff is concerned that exempting basements from FAR calculations could result in effectively larger accessory buildings and second units than the code allows. Therefore, staff therefore proposes to retain the proposed modification to include basements in the FAR calculations for detached accessory structures/buildings in single-family zones. Detached second dwelling ,nits would be .subject to the same regulations since they are required to conform to Section 19.80 Accessory Buildings/S~uctures. 1. Projects that meet all ordinance regulations will not require a building permit. 2. Applicants who propose detached accessory buildings with living space will need to comply with Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. 3. Applicants who propose detached accessory buildings larger than 640 sq.ft. (excluding garage space) would be required to apply for a variance as per Chapter 19.124. Summary The proposed modifications, as smended, address the Commission's concerns in the following inanner:. ~ 1. They help to clarify the ordinance without being overly restrictive; 2. The definitions in the ordlnallce do not conflict with those in the UBC. 3. They ensure that detached accessory buildings with living space can be conver'~.d to/used as second units, which conform to the ordinance. If the Planning Commission is satisfied that the issues have been sufficiently addressed in the proposed code Ame. ndmants, it rosy request that the City Council approve the modifications as amended to Chapter 19.08 Definitions and Chapter 19.80 Accessory Buildings/Structures based on tho Model Ordinance (Exhibit A) with or without revisions. In the event that the p]nnnlng Commission feels that the modifications should be combined with the second unit ordinance, staff will come back at a later aa,~. with the above modifications along with proposed changes to Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Units. Consideration of a Municipal' ~ Amendment revising Chap~r 19.08 and Cb :r 19.80 Dec~mlmr I~, 2001 Page $ Prepared by: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecld, Director of Community Developmen~ Model Resolution Exhibit A: Model Ordinance Exhibit B: Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance G:'~P~snnln~DREPOR~~ns~ 1 -MCA-01 (2).do~ Ci~ Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 CITY OF Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 CUPEILTINO kimberlys~:upenino.or8 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SUMAIARY Agenda Item No. I ~- Meeting Date: January 7, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Preparation of action minutes for all televised meetings. BACKGROUND The City Clerk is responsible for preparing the minutes of the City Council meetings. These draft minutes are reviewed and adopted by the City Council before they are considered final. A - similar process is followed for the Planning Commission and the other advisory boards, each of which reviews and adopts its own minutes. Once adopted, the minutes become the only official record of what took place at a meeting and may be subpoenaed for court purposes. Approved minutes are distributed by post to individuals upon request. The City Clerk currently mails out 23 sets of Council minutes and 18 sets of Planning Commission minutes. The Council and Planning Commission minutes are also posted on the City's Web site at www.cupertino.org. In 1983 the Cupertino City Channel began showing the Council and Planning Commission meetings on cable television. These meetings are shown live on Channel 26, and repeated twice each month. The Parks and Recreation meetings are also televised. Videotapes of the meetings are kept permanently, and may be purchased for a nominal fee. The videos of recent meetings are also available for checkout at the Cupertino library. Types of Minutes Minutes can be prepared in several different fo,mats, including action minutes, summary minutes, or a verbatim transcript. The City Clerk has been preparing summary minutes of the Council meetings, but with the advent of Webcasting and archived media on the Intemet, it is time to rethink our mode of recording and reporting Council actions to the public. One approach is to prepare action minutes instead of summary minutes. These action minutes would be complemented by on-demand Webcast of the actual meeting. January 7, 2002 Page 2 Action minutes have the following information: · Meeting date · Indication whether the meeting is regular, regular adjourned, or special · Location · Starting and ending times · Names of members and staffpresent , Description of items · A listing of speakers and whether they were in favor or opPosed to an item · A statement of action (motion, resolution or ordinance) and how the members voted. · Any statement of by a member that that person announced was "for the record." If the meeting is a workshop or study session, action minutes can be expanded into summary minutes when appropriate. Summary Minutes Currcntly the City Clerk's Office prepares summary minutes that include all of the items in action minutes with the addition of commentary by members of the public and Council. The comments of each speaker range from a few sentences to a few paragraphs. Summary minutes provide more of a flavor of what happened at the meeting, but have some inherent difficulties. It can be very difficult to distill 20 minutes of commentary, questions, and answers while providing the appropriate context. Further, the time it takes to prapare summary minutes can be much longer than the original meeting. Readers may not appreciate the additional text since they are usually reading the minutes to determine only what action was taken. Webcasting Now that the City of Cupertino is Webcasting the televised meetings, Inte~-itet users can watch those meetings live on computer. They can also watch the archived meeting at any time using streaming video. The city's current computer storage capabilities make the archived meetings available for 3-4 months, and next year additional storage will be available. The viewing software operates in the same way as a tape player, with volume, stop, pause, and fast-forward controls. Intemet users must have RealAudio installed (Version 8.0 is available by download free of charge). For those who do not have a computer at home, thc meetings may be viewed on the City Clerk's computers, and the Cupertino Library anticipates that they will be sbic to offer streaming video in a year or so. January 7, 2002 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staffto prepare action minutes for all televised meetings of the City. Submitted by: Approved for submission: Kimberly David W. Knapp City Clerk City Manager CC Misc./Staff Report- A¢fioa Minutes ~ ccs u1~43~J: November 14, 2001 The Honorable Sandm Mayor, City Council City of Cupertino 10300 Torte Avenue Cupmino, CA, 9S014-32S$ Dear Mayor James: The Couaty of Santa Clara is formins a Policy Advisory Board (PAB) ~or the Comprehemivo County Bxprusway Plannin~ Study. We invite your city to participate on the PAB by appointins one council 'me Comprehermive County Hxpressway Plsonins Study will develop and document consensus on pedestrian and bicycle facilities, sound walls, end landscwpin~. In addition, the Study will develop fundi~ roquircments, tq~nr~qg scenm-ios, and recom,qepdatiom regardin$ issues such as maintetmnce support and traffic enforcement. The PAB will provide s forum for policy input finn3 elected officials. The PAB's composition includes one city council member ~rom each city tluoush w~ch the expressways pass or border and one council member each fi'om Morsan Hill and Oilmy. Two County Supervisors and two Santa Clm Valley Ttampomtion Authority (VTA) Board members will ftho serve on the PAB. ]~sch q,~ialam3t to the PAR will i~t for the duration of the project, which is ;,~,~,,~,aimately one year. The first PAD meeting is sehedvlod for 7:30 am on January 17, 2001 in the Hyatt San Jose at 1740 North First Street, San Jose. " Plasse notify Mr. Mtchacl Mutdtet, Director, Santa Clam County ltoads end Airports Depaflmcnt, 101 Skyport Drive, Sen Jose, CA 9S110.1302, with your ci~,'s appoinmtents to the PAD by December 2001. If you have an), questions, please call my once at (408) 299-3924 or Mr. Mordter st (408) 573- 2438. Sincerely, Jmnts T. Beall, Jr. Senta Clara County Board of S~ Cit~ Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupe~ino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 CITY OF CUPE INO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM I ~ AGENDA DATE January 7. 2002' SUBJECT AND ISSUE Designation of Preferential Parking on Tula Court BACKGROUND De Anza College, west of this neighborhood holds a flea market is on the first Saturday of each month. The flea market has been very successful and generates a great amount of traffic. Not only is the neighborhood impacted with increased vehicular parking, but also traffic generated fi'om buyers seeking places to park.. A number of residents living on blocks adjacent to the flea market site have petitioned for and received permit parking during the period when the flea market is in operation (See attached Map). Residents of Tula Court have seen a steady intrusion of flea market patrons into their neighborhood over the years. This is in part a result of permit parking streets adjacent to their neighborhood as shown on the attached map. The adjacent street, Tula Lane, was approved for permit parking on June 4, 2001. At that time the residents on Tula Court had requested consideration their block as well but were advised that the he city's practice has been to require that at least of 67% of the residents in a given area must support a petition to approve permit parking and agreed to follow that procedure. Residents of the Tula Court neighborhood have now submitted a petition requesting permit parking on the 1st Saturday of each month for residential permit parking only. The petition represents 6 residents on Tula Court and all residents are in support. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 02- 00~ designating preferential parking on Tula Court on the First Saturday of each month between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM Submitted by: Approved for submission: Ralph A. Quails, Jr. David W. Knapp Director of Public Works City Manager - 74,006.1 RESOLUTION NO. 02-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCH, OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DESIGNATING PREFERENTIAL PARKING ON TULA COURT ON THE FIRST SATURDAY OF EACH MONTH BETWEEN 8:00AM AND 12:00PM. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1197 of the City of Cupertino ordains that a preferential parking zone be established in Cupertino in which parking will be prohibited on streets as designated by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, exemption to such prohibition shall be by parking pe,,it as established in said Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED that said re.-,~ictions on permit parking include the following: Street Name Side Limits Special Da~s Special Hours Tula Court Both All On the first Saturday 8:00 a.m.- of each month 12:00 p.m. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of January, 2002 by the following vote: Vote Council M¢i~bers AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 '-- FAX (408) 777-3333 CITY OF CUPERTINO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM ~ ~ AGENDA DATE January 7,2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Designation of Pex'afit Parking on Clearereek Court BACKGROUND The Blue Pheasant Restaurant is a popular local establishraem and regularly generates enough overflow parking to intrude into the adjacent neighborhood. Streets close to the Blue Pheasant Restaurant have petitioned for and received permit parking (see attached map). Residents of Clearcreek Court have seen a steady increase in parking, noise and traffic by the patrons of The Blue Pheasant Restaurant during the weekend evenings. This has prompted the residents to seek permit parking during these times, which reflect the current permit parking times on the adjacent streets. Residents of the Clearcreek Court submitted a petition requesting permit parking. The petition is to limit parking on Clearcreek Court, Friday through Sunday between the hours of 6:00 PM and 2:00 AM for residential pen'o_it parking only. This is consistent with the existing permit parking limits on the adjacent streets of Phar Lap Drive and Clearwood Court. The petition has been verified by staff and indicates neighborhood support by over 80% of the residents, which exceeds the city's practice to require that at least 67% of the residents are in support of the permit parking. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 02- 0~0 designating preferential parking on Clearereek Court, Friday through Sunday between 6:00 PM and 2:00 AM. Submitted by: Approved for submission: Ralph A. Quails, Jr. David W. Knapp Director of Public Works City Manager 74,006.1 RESOLUTION NO. 02-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DESIGNATING PREFERENTIAL PARKING ON CLEARCKEEK COURT, FRIDAY THROUGH SUNDAY BETWEEN THE HOD-RS OF 6:00 P.M. AND 2:00 A.M. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1197 of the City of Cupertino ordains that a preferential parking zone be established in Cupertino in which parkln§ will be prohibited on streets as designated by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, exemption to such prohibition shall be by parking p~m~it as established in said Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said parking prohibition shall include the following restriction: Street Name Side Limits Days Hours Clearereek Court Both All Friday, Saturday 6:00 p.m. -2:00 a.m. and Sunday PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7t~ day of January, 2002 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino City Hall 10300 Torrc Avenue -~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3262 CITY OF FAX: (408) 777-3366 CUPERTINO Public information Office SUMMARY Agenda Item ] ~ Date: Jnnuary'~, 2002' Subject: Report on Falun Gong proclamation request. Background: At its last meeting on December 17, 2001, the City Council was naked to adopt a resolution in support of Falun Gong and condca~ming policies in the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). Local supporters and practitioners of Falun Gong have solicited the involvement of runny local and state officials to address persecution of Falun Gong members in the PRC. To date, Cupertino has not adopted or taken positions on issues that are not of specific significance in Cupertino. This practice has helped to mitigate community involvement in controvercial issues over which it has no control. The Falun Oong/PRC is an apparently simple issue that pwves to be more complex with further analysis. Reports by Anmesty International indicate that the PRC is pursuing policies in regards to the Falun Gong that are inconsistent with the values of Western democracy. Yet, the San Jose Mercury News recently reported that Falun Gong doctrine "explains the existence of mixed race people - who number 1.6 million in California - as instruments of an alien plot to destroy humanity's link to heaven." Similarly negative attitudes are held for homosex-als. Policies and practices of both the Falun Gong and the PRC are at least controversial. Recommendation: The City Council decline to adopt resolutions or proclamations that are not of specific importance or impact to the residents, city or community of Cupertino. Submitted by: ~ Approved for submission: Rick Kitson David Knapp Public Information Officer City Ma~nger THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS PASSED OUT DURING THE MEETING ~?.' Request for Cupertino City Counsel Vote on the Road Bump Plan for .... ~. Maxine Ave. Thi~ i~ a mqu~t for C~ Coun~l vot~ on th~ ~oad Bump ~lan and the a~propriat~n~ of taxpayer ~nditum~ up to $~ ~,ri00 for road bump At issue is the just~cation of ci~ expend~u~s for road bumps pu~uant to CMC 11 .~'.030 (K) when it is not evident by the raw data ob~ined dudng the ~u~e of the tm~c study pe~o~ed on W~nesday, November 7~, 2001, that tra~c speed on Maxine Ave. is unsafe, merging the installation of mad bumps. III. Argument Against: ;~:'. We am ~n~rned about the sa~ of our children, and the value ~ safe .... '.. residential street. However, we a~ also fis~lly ~nscious in terms of .~, .... value for our tax dollam spent. We a~ appealing to the Ci~ Counsel to vote and ,~.?." eliminate the ins~llation of any mad bumps on Maxine Ave. as the mw data does not suppo~ that tm~c spe~ is unsafe nor d~s it just~ the expend~ure of taxpayer dollam for road bumps. Cleady, Maxine Ave. w~h an average speed of ~:, ' 21.69 MPH is a safe street and does not wa~nt mad bumps. The money saved on'safe str~s like Maxine Ave, c~ld be be~r utilized on ci~ stme~ where traffic speed, is in fa~, unsafe. · ..IV. Discussion: ~ ~ :~ ' 'This request affe~ the ~en~-~o (22) pa~ls pu~uant to the executed petition ~ ~".. requesting that a tm~c study be pe~ormed with mga~ to possible road bump ,.installation on Maxine Ave. See Appendix I - Petition. '*~ .V~' Profile of Maxine Ave: ~Ave. is a sho~, wide, No~h/South ~nninG street with a 'blind cuwe', inteme~ions, and numerous ovemize (three ~r wide) d~veways ' ' :~n the roadway. See Appendix 2 - Pardi Map. round: of Public Works, hereinafter called the City Engineer, perfoh¥~ed the IV Ave. on Wednesday, November 7th, 2001. The traffic study was conducted on the roadway and included both north and southbound -, lanes. ,, Per the City Engineer, traffic studies are, 'conducted over a one week period. However, the set-up day, (typi~lly Monday) and the pickup day (usually Friday) · ~- are discounted since they am not complete days. It is and has been standard , ' practice in (Cupertino) and other cries to u,~ the Wednesday data as · ..-. representative of a typical (traffic) flow pattern." " VII. Road Bump Evaluation Guidelines per CMC 11.34.030 (K): --":.' In layman's terms, the text of CMC 11.34.030 (K) states the criteria for mad :! .' ' bump installation is that more than 15% of the traffic must indicat~ a speed faster ~',. than 32 MPH during the course of the study. See Appendix 3 - CMC 11.34.010, '.. 11.34.020, and 11.34.030. · ~... ' VIII. Road Bump Evaluation Results: The resulting mw data obtained from the engineering evaluation for Maxine Ave. · '"~:' on Wednesday, November 7th, 2001, indicates: .~i}. · Them were. a total (north and southbound traffic) of 706 cars involved ~' ~:"' , during the course Of the traffic study on November 7th. When the math is -- '.:.' ' done, ,14.3% of the traffic drove faster than 32 MPH. Less than 15% of ~ ~'~!!~"~.:. the cars' met the criteria required for the installation of road bumps. . :..:.:.:. ' · .. The average speed of both north and southbound traffic was 21.69 MPH. · The average median 'speed of both north and southbound traffic was 21.46 MPH. ',.-" ~. 'See Appe;ndix 4 - Raw Data obtained on Wednesday, Nov 7th, 2001. IX. Summation of Evaluation Reeults: .... The criteria for the installatiOn of road bumps requires that 15% or more of traffic - .". be.traveling faster than 32 MPH during the course of the traffic study. The raw show~ that only 14.3% of the traffic met the criteria. Planned Road Bump Ins~llation and Cost(s): ,neer is in the process of approving the Road Bump Plan for Maxine traffic study results obtained onWednesday, November 7th, 2001. ' " in the process of planning the installation of one (1) to three ,i~Maxine. Ave. at a ~ost to taxpayers of $3,500 to $11,500, :):installat. ion is shown: See Appendix 5 - Typical Road Xll. Conclusion: The raw data, as a result of the traffic study, has not proven that traffic speed on Maxine Ave. is unsafe.. A thoughtful review of the raw data indicates that Maxine i ' Ave. is not only a safe street, but also does not meet the criteria of CMC ,'. 11.34.030 (K) for the installation of road bumps. i Appendix t. Petition ' Appendix 2. Parcel Map ~.~-, Appendix 3. CMC 11.34.010, 11.34.020, and 11.34.030 ? Appendix 4. Raw Data obtained on Wednesday, November 7th, 2001 ,., ~-'~':,:."' Appendix 5. Typical Road Bump Installation / -- TO: Director of Public Works DATB: ,2001 . - City of Cupertino ... FROM: Residents of Maxine Avenue < RE: ROAD BUMPS f:..'". The speed of traffic on Maxine Avenue is a concern to us. Consequently, we are petitio, i.g the City to perform ' · / J~''a~W~ traffiC, and engineering survey and to place mad l~mps on Maxine Avenue between Homestead Road <' ~'~. ~nd Caroline Drive to rexluo~ tl~ vehicle sp~d oftnflti¢ to tl~ legal llmlt of 25 mil~ pot hour. I have r~,~,ed / '~ ~:. ' Hyannisport Drive for a typical street road bump installation and I am aware that the road bump or sign " !!.~onld be pheed in front of my property. ' ~.' ADDRBSS NAME (Print) SIGNATURE ~,' Book 326 Page 3 Lot # '~'};.10921 Maxine Avenue 12. ~L': Ma~.ine Avenue 15 ~',~_, Hibiscus Drive 16 ~ e'Drive ]6 . ~?* "Maxine Avenue 53/ '~Avenue 55 · ~..'A.v=ue 56 TO: Director of Public Works DATE: ,2001 City of Cupert~r~o FROM: Residents of Marine Av.enue RE: ROAD BUMPS i".... The speed of/r~c on Byrne Avenue is a concern to us. Consequently, we. ~ petitionlng the City tO'perform. appropriate traffic end engineering surv~ and to place wad bumps on B~'rne' Avenue between MeC!elI~n'.R~d,i, and Gr~nada Avenue to .r~clu.ce the vehicle sT, ccd of traffic to thc leEal limit of 25 miles per houri Hyannisport Drive for s t~plcel street reed bump instelhtion endI em aware.that the' reed .. could be placed in front of my properS. · ADDKEss NAME (Print) SIGNATURE ' ' ' '" '"' "'""" · · :".i' .:':~, .' · )iBook 326 Page2 Lot# ... '" 10768 M~.]ne Avenue $7 ~,. 10,,/78M~xine Avenue 58 Mexfne Avenue 5g 10"/g8 Maxine Xvenue 60, · 1080~ Mexine Avenue 61 Ivhxine Avenue 6~ 10860 Mmcine Avenue 63 P~2of 2 · 11.~4.010 Chapter 11,34 · B. Th~ strem; is 'no wider than forty feet from a~rb to aa'b or from ed~ of pavement ~o edg6 of ROADWAY DF, SIGN FFA~ pavemea~.. C. The steer co~t~,,s no more than on~ lan~ in Sections: each direction. 11.34.010 Road bmnp~I)efinilion. D. A speexl ~a,~it of tweat~-fiw mil~s per hour 1134.020 A flminisirative authority, has ~ p. stnhllqhp~:[ in CoIIfocIIIRIIG~ wi~h S~tp- 1L34~)30 Win'rants for the.instahtion E. Ti~ sU'eet is not a l~,_,ck roum o~ a Iransit bus bnmps. F. The ~ has an ave, rage,annual daily traffic .. volume of less than four thousand vehicles. Road bump--Definition. O. The m-..et has a maximum grad~ of' five .i'.: A bump is a vertical rise in tim surface of the pmcent or less for any segment between "parturient of tlur. e to thre~ and one-quarter inchestions. '" and twelve feet in leagth. There is no ve.~ical ~- or curve' to the road Immp shall b~ one hundred fifty ~':. pla~ment start to flnlsb of the mad .Ip,rnI~' The feet. · shpe is consisteat for the full width of the pave- L Thc spacing between mad bumps s~n~ be a · meat ex.c.e~ for the last one foot at each cad. Thc minim,un of four hundred feet and a maximum of .ends win be tapered so that they arc flush, with the five hundred fif~ feet. · roadway at the edge of pavement or at the tip of a I. Thc road bump is vin'ole for a distance of gutter. (Ord. 1837, 1999:-Ord, 14~0 (l~art), 1987) one hundred fifty feet. K. The re. mit of a Iraffic and e~neering survey 11.34.020 Administrative authority, must indicate a minimum eighty-five percent ap- . Them arc ~afencd Upon the CityMs-,?_er those proach speed of tblny-two miles per hour. (Ord. :powers and duties necessary for the administration 1847, 2000; Ord. 18~9, 1999; Ord. 14:~0 (pan), chapt~. In addition, them is also conferred !987) i~ksismte such officers an;t emplo).ees of the City, Sheriff's !~.pa, t, ocut and Fue D~pa, h~.~t, as to s~st him in cmyiag out the . purpose of this c~ter. (OuL 18~8,1999: Win'rants for the ~n"t-~on and , be installed and msintsi.,.d on · . all of thc followin~ criteria haw bccn luid~n~ial sram as ck~ncd by ti~ Califor. is ~r b), Cit~ Council actions. ~', Site Name Maxine S/O Homestead SB i.~.' Jurisdiction Cupt. ~.. Study Type ~peed Location Coda 20 f ?" Dlre¢~on South ~ ;~ Real Time t0:51 '~, Start Data t 1/05/2001 *;~, Start Time. 11:00 ~ Sample Time 01:00 9.' Operator Number 2032 ~ ~"' Machine Number 20908 ~ii'. In¢ Speed 2 ~ ~:' Begin 0-24 25-26 27-28 29-30 31-32 33-34 35-36 37-38 39-40 4142 43-44 45+ Total C ~,, 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 2' 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ',.~,. 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ '~:... ·04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;;,',, ·05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~'~.'.. 1 %:. 0g:00 3 0 ' 1 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 ,~!-.. 09:00 2 ~ 4 ~ 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ~,:,. 10:00 4 0 2 t 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 21 23 ~ 43 2O ~ · 10 ~ g 7 ~ 2 27 28 14 4 10 ' 21 2 299 Total ~ 0.O3 0.3, 7.361 4.68 1.34 3.34 0.671 0.67 % ~ · .Oeilv Summery " !:' Average Speed 20.74 ~ '~ .~',,: Median Speed 23.51 ,15th Percentile Speed . 7.05 / 85th Percentile Speed 3.1.51 ~ 110 mph Pace 23-33 ,ce T=l .' 265 88.O3 % ~ ~ Vehi;ies >= 55 mph 0 0.00 % ~ehtcles :,= 60 mph 0 0.00 % ~ ~.'~ >= 65 mph 0 0.00 % ~ ~ .l:~ak Hour Start 07:00 ~.F~Bak HOur Total 26 ~ ..R~..kc~e~(. Hour Start 18:00 i .ourT 43 ~ P.~L/=~tak Hour Fe(:~,or 100.00 % Site Name Maxine S/O Homeateed NB ...: Jurisdiction Cupt. :~' Study Type Speed ;~ Location Code 10 · ,~, Direction NOrUl '; Dale 11a)5/2001 :~ Real Time 10:40 , Stert Date 11/05/2001 .~' Start Time 11:00 ·'* ~' Sample Tune 01:00 :? ~! Operator Number 2t04 ,,. Ma=Nne Number 21908 ,,,, Begin 0-24 25-26 27-28 29.30 31-32 33-34 35-36 37.-38 39-40 4142 43-44 45+ Total ;,'~'~ 00:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 · o1:0o o o o o I o o o o o o o :~- ;!? 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~.', · 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :,.. 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ~, '~J 05:00 I I 1. 0 0 2 0 0 I 0 0 0 6 ;, ~: 06:00 4 I I 2 1 ~ 2 0 0, 0 0 0 0 11 .~'.' 07:00 50 · ~, . .. 10:00 5 ' 2 .3 2 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 20 ,. 18;00 27 .~; h~ ' ':.Dailv Summary :~- : :"Average Speed 22.63 ¥ . Median Speed 25.41 ~-" ':. ,Moda Speed 12.00 · -" :t 5th ?ementlle Speed 8.57 ~ 33.00 i 23.33 340 83.54 % mph 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % Hour 8t~ 07:00 45 P-,C~'q.e~ wtlrre 12' RCr'LECTIVE WHITe 5TRJPP.5 ·PAVEMENT L,~GISqD ~ 5PAC, ING )* W' ~; OMUTCD W'I3-1)-I § MPH ?ISNN VIEW W37 OvlUTCD WG (MUTCD WI 3- I) (~tandard 51=CTION A-A SECTION D-D STANDARD DET~,TL$ I ~ ..... City ! APPLICATION FORM 0 I Co~m~nit3' Development Depa~ tment Cup~o, CA 95014 Fax (4~) ~ Ad, firess ~.{~, ~"~o~ tt "z . Phone ~ APN ~ i R-~[-~ ~ ~ning ~, ~' ~ral Plan D~i~afio. ~ D~ption of Project Ex~sging Proposed Land Use ~, ~ ~ Parcel Size Net 3.1~o0 0 G~ ~O Ne G~ ~ Dwe~ng Uni~ ~ D~i~ per G~s A~ ~ Build~s Squm Foo~se ~ 0 ~ ~ Lot Coverage (P~c..~) ..~{ ~ ~ Pa~ng ~ea (Perc~ge) ~.vel ~ Lands~pe ~a (Pe~en~ge) ~ } ~ '~ ~ [ ~ Building HeiSt ~ / ~ Re~lar H=dicapped g~ ~ N~ber of Employees ~M ~ inml~ an dpg, o~l ~ t~ P~nning ~ ~ ~ ~u~l of t~s ~lim~n. I un~M~ ~t ~ a~l~tion ~ ~ ~itM~ ~ I ~ ~ au~ ~m~ not ~t at t~ ~u~ m~), or ~ a ~ttm ~t ~ ~s~t ~ ~ p~ ~ t~ P~nning C~mi~~ ~ ~ ~~ th~ a~li~n ~ith t~ Public Wor~ ~ff a~ I un~ta~ t~ ~ id~hmun~altyofp~t~tlamt~ofm~p,.p, lyor~P~ofAtt~fat~)~m~p~andt~tl Print Prope~ O~e~s Name ~ ~ Signa~ Date ~ File,(s): E.A., ~. P~headn~ ERC PC CC B. Act P~app~cafion Ph~ Si~a~:. Con/e~nce October 31, 1995 City .,I APPLICATION FORM Communit3- Development Department Cupertino Cupertino, CA 95014 Fax (408) 777-3333 Property Owner ¢ LI- 1..~, ~ Addres~Oi--{~,.,~ j~,l'j e-.-c,'[3~i.'~',lm.,,~ t" 'd}- Phone _ Fax Project Clntact Person ~ % ) .I . ~,~q ~'a ,iO ~. ~. ~-~ ~ ) / Address'~-0q ~ P~b~-rl4~ ~,) j2,a, Phone APN2~-~-~~oning.: - ~t 0,'-- P p G~enlPlanDesi Propa$~d Land Use ~ Dwelling Units ~ Density per Gross Acre ~ Building -~qua~ Footase ~ LmCovense (Per~en~se) ( ~' ~uildi~g Height ~ Paring ~ R~lar . Compact I Handi~pped Hou o Op, .o. Number of Employees I ~ t~t t~fo~g~g s~ts ~ ~e and ~t to t~ ~t of ~t~l~aut~~mt~not~tatt~s~m~gs),vr~a~ttm~t~n~t~ publicP~mt~tm~mtta t~ P~ni~mui~m~Comm~n~t~ ~ ~;~th th~t. I d~m und~ ~lty of~u~ t~t I am t~ ~n~ of~ p~ or ~ P~ ofAtto~ (atta~ '~Fy)~m m~ ~ ~ md t~t l co~t to tM a~ ~plim~n. P~nt Propellers Name ~ i ~. } . Pmhea~ng ~C PC CC B. Act P~app~ca~on Planwr Si~. Co~e~n~ October 31, 1995 t, ~., City ~APPLICATION FORM of : ] Development D~ad.~e~t . 1~ To~e Aveflue (~) ~-~08 ~roject Ad~ __ ~ Lot Co--ge ~) Compact Handicapp~ ~ ~. / ~), P~hea~ng ERC PC CC B. Ac~ October 31, 199~ 06-U-99(M) CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6064 OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR ONE YEAR FOR AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE STORAGE AT 20030 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit Modification, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the .City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and V~tlEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title. 3) The proposed use will foster the Heart of the City goal of creating a positive and memorable image of Cupertino on or near Stevens Creek Boulevard, since it will be a temporary use while long-term plans are being prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Modification is hereby approved; and That the subconclusious upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. 06-U-99(M) as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 27, 2000, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 6064 06-U-99 (M) November 27, 2000 Page -2- SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 06-U-99 (M) Applicant: Cali-Land Associates Location: 20030 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION III: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based upon Exhibit labeled Call-Land Site Plan as may be modified by additiorm contained herein. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. Times of delivery are confined to Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 2. There shall be a maximum of 10 deliveries per month. 3. All access shall be from Stevens Creek Boulevard. 4. All portions of the area to be used for vehicle storage will have a minimum of gravel base. 5. No maintenance/servicing or merchandising of cars shall occur on site. 6. The use p¢,uit is granted for a one-year period beginning on September 1, 2000, and expiring August 31, 2001. All automobile storage use shall terminate on that date. The applicant shall apply for a new use permit should continued automobile storage be desired. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of November, 2000 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call ' vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Kwok, Stevens and Chairperson Harris NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Steve Piasecki /s/ Andrea Harris Steve Piasecki Andrea Harris, Chairperson Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission g:/planning/pdreportJrea/O6u99(M) Planning Commission/V es 9 November 27, 2000 Mr. Piasecki noted that the two would be meshed into the records, so that it stands as file motion. Com. Kwok asked if the applicant had any problems with the modifications or changes. The applicant responded no. MOTION: Com. Kwok moved approval of Application 1-EXC-00 with the conditions as modified by Mr. Piasecki in Condition No. 5 above and according to the recommendations by the geologist dated April 25, 2000; and to periodical evaluation to provide stability and ensure that there were no cracks; to post a bond for appropriate maintenance for 2 rainy seasons at a cost equal to the cost of putting in piers; to be held two years after the completion of the project. Also, Condition No. 9, no grading during wet seasons, as defined in the Municipal Code, unless approved by the City Engineer. SECOND: Com. Corr ABSENT: Com. Doyle VOTE: Passed 4-0-0 Mr. Piasecki said that he wanted to ensure that it included "as defined in thc Cupertino Municipal Code unless approved by the city engineer." The reason we include 'unless approved' is there can be some minor grading; they can be at the end of their grading cycle; it may not be that substmatiaL MOTION: Com. Stevens moved to approve Application 03-EA-00 SECOND: Com. Kwok ABSENT: Com. Doyle VOTE: Passed 4-0-0 Mr. Piasecki noted, for the record that the architect and the applicant Mr. Yeh, had worked cooperatively with the city, and went through a long process to get tile building lowered and minimize some oft. he impacts. Com. Corr concurred, and said that they appeared before the Environmental Review Committee multiple times and worked very hard to get to the point where they could secure tile approval tonight. Com. Stevens expressed concern regarding the rapid flow of water from tile street when it is raining. He said the Director of Public Works, who has since retired, was looking at moving culverts and similar things. He questioned where all the downhill water would go to. It was suggested that the minutes be forwarded to the present Director of Public Works so that he would be aware of the issue. 6. Application No.: 06-U-99(M) Applicant: Cali-Land Associates Location: 20030 Stevens Creek Boulevard Request to extend an approved use permit for one year for automobile vehicle storage. Postponed from Planning Commission meeting October 23, 2000 Planning Commission decision final unless appealed Planning Commission s~:-,~tes 10 November 27, 2000 Staff presentation: The video presentation reviewed the application for a one year extension on an approved use permit for automobile vehicle storage, as outlined in the staff report. Staff recommends approval of the one-year extension; Planning Commission decision on application is final, unless appealed within 14 calendar days. Ms. Wordell pointed out that the applicant was unable to be present at the meeting and requested that if approval was not granted or there were questions to be answered by him in order to approve it, a continuance would be requested. She said that if a decision could not be made, the Planning Commission might want to honor the applicant's request; however, they are already stretching the expiration of their prior use permit. Ms. Wordell said that the zoning was Planned Development, part of the Heart of the City. Chair Harris noted that the permit had expired three months ago. Ms. Wordell provided background history on the application to extend the use permit. She said that one of the reasons staff did not want to have it continue m roll over was that there have been talks in the past about developing the remainder of the property and the plans have not been implemented and could continue for some time. Staff does not want to prolong that kind ct' discussion because they feel it is not a good ultimate use for such prime property in the heart of the city. Com. Stevens commented that the last time the application was reviewed the owners of the other two properties were'aisc present at the meeting and they could not reach a decision on what to do with all three parcels, making the future unknown at that time. He said that on Page 6-I it says that staff can support an additional year while stating in the resolution that no further extensions will be considered, and also states if the applicant wishes to apply for continued car storage, a new permit would be required. Ms. Wordell said that the permit could not be extended again, the applicant would have to apply. Mr. Piasecki said that they need to emphasize that this is not a good long term use of the property, and that the applicant needs to decide what to do with the property. Staff. is not inclined to grant a new use permit; however, the applicant has the option to ask for one. MOTION: Com. Corr moved approval of Application 6-U-99(M) SECOND: Com. Stevens ABSENT: Com. Doyle VOTE: Passed 4-0-0 7. Application No.: 21-ASA-00 Applicant: Pinn Brothers (Adobe Inn) Location: 20328 Stevens Creek Blvd. Appeal of architectural and site approval for design details of an approved 77 room hotel. Postt~oned~rom Planning Commission meeting o;f ~Vovember 25, 2000 Planning Commission deeision final unless at~t~ealed Note that the action on this application is final, although any action regarding an ordinance change is subject to City Council approval Staff presentation: Chair Harris noted that she filed the appeal and was advised by counsel that she could remain and be part of the discussion and vote since the appeal was made as a Planning Planning Comn~ssion Minur.~ 2 August 9, 1~)9 Locmion: 10645 Cordova Road (Lot B) Hiilsid~ Exception to consmmt a new 3,133 squar~ foot rosidanc~ on an existing lot. Planmng Commission decision final unless appealed Request continuance to Planning Commission meeting of September 13, 1999 1 o. Application No.(s): 8-U-99, 21-EA-99 Applicauc HOK Architects Location: 20330 Torte Avenue (for Symantec Corporation) Us~ Pe~nit to consUuct a 1,750 squa~ foot addition (L~irnin~ Center ) at an exisling office building Planning Commission decision final unless appealed. Request continuance to Planning Commission meeting of September 13, 1999 1 I. Application No.(s): 5-U-99, 17-EA-99 Applicant: Evershlne Group (Marketplace) Location: 19750 SteYens Creek Boulevard Us~ Pramit to demolish an exis6ng 9,464 square foot vacant reP-a,,aul and conslruct two new commt~a~al buildings totaling 26,159. squar~ fe~t. Continued from Planning Commission meeting of July 26, 1999 Tentative CiO~ Council hearing date: August 16, 1999 Request contirtutmce to Planning Commission meeting of September 13, 1999 MOTION: Com. I-I~,is moved to postpone Items 2, 3, 4, 10 and I1 to the September 13, 1999 plam~-',,~o Co ...... ission me~g SECOND: Con~ Corr ABSENT: Co,,, Kwok VOTE: Passed 40-0 ORAL COI~MUNICATIONS: Mr. Alvin Deriddrr, 19146 Ann Lane, Cupe~dno, spoke on behalf of the residents of the Sam Ciist House, a home for independent living for handicapped people. He disimss~ a potential safety problem relative to the lark of a sidewalk for wheelchair a~essibility. He suggested a temporary asph,,~t sidewalk be iastalletL Mr. Robert Cowan, Community Development Director, said he would contact the Public Works D~p*,~ment and if a safety issue was involved, ther~ rosy be discr~ona~ ihn__ds available to improve thc b*--rdous exmditions. He noted that street improvements were normally completed by the develol~rs. Mr. D~ridder t~prcssed his appreciArlon to the planning Commission and staff for addressing the isslm. CONSENT CALENDAR: None Ch~irp~on Doyle olmned thc public hearing. 5. Application No.: 6-U-99 Applicant: Cali-Land Associaics Location: 20030 Stevens Creek Bonleva~d Request for a two-year Us~ Permit for a car storage lot on a vacant parcel. Planning Commission decision final unless appealevl RESOLUTION NO. 5064 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING TEMPORARY USE OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONED PARCEL FOR AN AUTOMOBILE VEHICLE STORAGE FOR LUCAS DEALERSHIPS SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 6-U-99 ~ Applicant: Cali-Land Associates Location: 20030 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WI-iEREAS, the planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application tbr extension ora temporary use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds: a) That the use is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and is not detrimental to existing uses specifically pe,ufitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that after careful consideration of exhibits and testimony submitted in this matter, application 6=U=99 is hereby approved and the temporary use of the subject property for auto storage will be regulated in a manner to preclude visual and non impact to neighboring properties. SECTION III: CONDITIONS BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based upon Exhibit labeled Cali=Land Site Plan as may be modified by additions contained herein. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Times of delivery are confined to Monday thxough Friday, g:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 2. There shall be a maximum of 10 deliveries per month. 3. All access shall be from Stevens Creek Boulevard. 4. All portions of the area to be used for vehicle storage will have a minimum of gravel base. 5. No maintenance/servicing or merchandising of cars shall occur on site. 6. The use pe,~$,it is granted for a one=year period beginning on September 1, 1999, and expiring August 31, 2000. The applicant may request an extension prior to the expiration date. Pla~aiag Commission Minutes 3 August 9, 1999 Stuff vresentation: Thc video presentation reviewed the application for a one year use p~,~,;t extension to allow continued storage of c,~a on 20030 Stevens Creek Boulevard, while Stevens Creek Honda undergoes remodeling. Stn/V ret,, ...... ends approval of a one-ye~ extension only; a decision if reached, will be fianl~ anless appenled within 14 calendar days. Mr. Cow~m clnri~ed that the prepo~d model resolution does not provide for the one yea~ approval. He recn ...... ended a 12 month extension beginning September 1, 1999, ending September 1, 2000. Mr. Gn~ S~hmldt, Economic Analysis and Development Emerprises, provided historical backgro~ of the pnrcel in question nmi e~pJnined th~ ~'~ for the swrnge space. Clufir Doyle opened tho meeting for l:rablic comment; the~e was no one present who wished to sp . MOTION:. Com. Sltrcens moved to approve Application 6-U-99 with the chnnge to a one-year eg~msion, endin$ August 31, 2000. SECOND: Con~ Corr ABSENT: Com. Kwok VOTE: Passed 4-0-0 6.. Appfication No.(s): 3-TM-99, 14--EA-99 Location: 7359 Rainbow Drive Tentative map to subdivide a 14,661 squar~ foot parcel into seven lots for m approved townhouse development. Continued from Planning Commission meeting of July 26, 1999 Tentative City Council hearing date: August 16, 1999 St~ff presents6on: The video p~c-~entation revi~'wed the application to mbdivide a 14,461 square foot parcel into eight lots for an approved townhous~ development, as ontllned in tho attached stnt~F report. The application to demolish the existing complex was approved in late 199~; and stnO' found the t~talive map to be consistent with the approved us~ permit. Issues concerning site d~,~nge and tree protection were resolved and conditions were drawn up during the use permit approval process, w/th the exception ora 19 inch deodora cedar located on the northwest corner of tho property, which the applicant is request/nE to remove. Ms~ Chen's proposal is to replace tho tre~ with a 36 inch box ~ree. S~,~ recommends approval of the 8 lot subdivis/on based upon conditions of approval; a decision will be forwarded to the City Council for a final decis/on. Mr. Tom Sloan, project arch/tect, ,m~vered questions relstlve to the tre~ removal and replacement. Chair Doyle opened the meeting for publi~ c,,,~,-,ent; there was no one present who w/shed to Ms. Judy Che~, applicant, referred to the prolimlnsry landscape plan and noted the ~ placement in the neighboring yards. She pointed out that the tree in question was blocking utility poles and was presemty not in h~althy cond/tion. Com. Stevens expressed concern that the ne/ghbor who was or/ginally concerned with the Ire~ removal when the project was approved, was not present, nor was there any indication the neighbor had any input on the latest proposal for removal. Com. Corr said that he felt the present lree may surv/ve. Com. Harris said thnt because of the root problems and condition of the present tree, she PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9* day of August, 1999, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Robert S. Cowan /s/David Doyle 'Robert S. Cowan, Director of David Doyle, Chairman Community Development ~/planning/res/fu99ext ~ ['----' '~i~Yli~--Ll~ ~ ~l~~ :: l~l~~ Stevens Cr~k Bou~vard Stratum ..................... ___. I _ , ~ . ~'..,'.-.~':~ ; · .' .' · .._ 2.'2Z.2 ....... ,~.' · -,~.~...., ...... · j :¢~ ~. -:7.~ _~ · -=_ · ._ ' "~" ~ ~x.':'."'. ~ ~ Gourtyard, ~ui~inO . · : . ...'..'::?;.. . .. :...'.< /. . .' ,.::.'~.-~::. .:~ .. .?~ [¢.i ?.~ ..;:~ -:.'~..-.. · '.:~;,.. · · .'.~ ....: z.~..~., . . ? ~: ':'~ .-.: ..'. '..' 'R~ '~ · ......... ..' ~~ . . .: . ~, · . .. .:'..: ).~.'; · llcnee i~_'!r? 101~0 Slum Ave. Culxtliao+ Ca. 9~014 lx~ G. lUch, l, Jaidmt TOTP~ P. 01