Loading...
CC 08-25-80 . . - - . CITY r:JF CUPERTINO, STATE 01 CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue, Cup::rtillO, CA 950n Telephone: 252-450S KINUTES OF TIlE Al).JOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF TIlE CITY COUllCIL HELD OR AUGUST 2S, 1980 IN THE COUIICIL CHAMBER, CITY BALL CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA Mayor Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. in the Council Chamber of Ci ty Hall. ROLL CALL Counci Counc. Present: Absent: Plungy, Sparks, Mayor Rogers Gatto Staff Present: City Manager Quinlan City Clerk Cornelius Director of Public Works Viskovich Director of Planning and Development Sisk PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Application 32-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Scenic Boulevard/Riviera Road): Prezoning approximately 1.4 gross acres from Santa Clara County Rl-IO (One family residence, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) zone to City of Cupertino P (Planned Development with Residential 1-5 dwelling unite per gross acre intent) and approximately 2.6 acres from Santa Clara County Rl-IO (One family residence, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size> zOPe to City of Cupertino Rl-IO (Residential, Single-familj, 10,000 sq. ft. minimum let size) zone and Environmenta Review: The Planning CoIllll1ssion recolIIDends the granting of a Nega- tive Declaration. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Scenic Boulevard and Palm Avenue and easterly of Scenic Boulevard approxtaately 500 ft. northerly of Palm Avenue. Recom- mended for app~oval. (a) First reading of Ordinance Nt.. 1043: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinànce No. 2 by Pre~oning Approximately 1.4 Gross Acres from Santa Clara County Rl-IO Zon to City of Cupertino? Zone and Approximately 2.6 Acres from Santa CIOJra County Rl-IO Zone to City o¡"Cupertino Rl-IO' ZIMIe; Located on the Northeast Corner of Scenic Boulevard and Palm Avenue and Easterly of Scenic Boulevard Approximately 500 Ft. Northerly of Palm Avenue." It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passzd un?n- imously by those present to close the pUb'ic hearing. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those present to grant a Négative Decl3ration f0r Application 32-Z-80. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those prrsent to approve Application 32-Z-BO per Qlanning C~mmi~sion Rp.solution No. 2116. CC-513 Page 1 Public hearing closed Negative Dec. for 32-Z-BO 32-Z-BO approved CC-513 P"2 ~t reading of Ord. 1043 Continued . .. MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COU:¡CIL MEETING It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy anel paased unani~usly by those present to read Ordinance No. 1043 by title only and the City Clerk'a reading to constitute the first reading. 2. Application 33-Z-80 of City of Cu¡>ertino (West Valley Industrial Park): Prezon1ng approxillately . s± gross acres from Santa Clara County A (Exclusive Agricultural) to City of Cupertino HI. {Light Industrial) zone and Environmental Review: The Planning Co.-ission rec_nds the granting of a Negative Declaration. The subject property is located adjacent to and northerly of McClellan Road approximately 700 ft. east of Bubb Road adjacent to the unimproved State Freeway 85 right of way. Recommended for approval. (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1044: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Prezoning Approximately .Sf Gross Acres from Santa Clara County A Zone to City of Cupertino ML Zone; Located Adjacent to and Northerly of McClellan Road Approximately 700 Ft. East of Bubb Road Adjacent to the Unimproved State Freeway 85 Right of Way." It vas moved by Counc. Sparks, s~conded by Cotmc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to continue the hearing to the regular meeting of Tuesday, September 2, 1980. 3. Application 34-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Stelling Road/Rainbow Drive): Prezoning approximately 6 gross acres from Santa Clara County Rl-lac (Agricultural/Residential, one acre minimum lot size) zone to City of Cupertino Rl-6 ~Residential, Single-family, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) zone and Environmental R~view: The Planning Comuission recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. The subject property is located on the east side of St~lling Road approximately 150 ft. northerly of Shadowhill Lane. Rec~nded Îor ..pproval. (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1045: '!An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Prezoning Approximately 6 Gross Acres from Santa Clara County AI-lac Zone to City of Cupertino RI-6 Zone; Located on the East Side of Stelling Road Approximately 150 Ft. Northerly of Shadowhill Lane." Lois Kirchner, 11360 S. Stelling, addressed Council regarding restrained growth. She read a letter into the record. Mr. Kirchner, 11360 S. Stelling, spoke in objection to a squeezed community and noise problems. Mr. John Mangano spoke against the a lower density. He stated he was against the Planning Commission's of Application 35-Z-BO. proposed prezoning and requested leaving the community and was decision regarding the prezoning . . . ·'-r"''',""''''';:_:I''''' :"- MINUTES OF TIlE ADGUSr 25, 1980 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mr. John Delgado, l1400 South Stelling Road, told Council that he doea keep horses on his property and he felt the City should give property owners the zoning to ..xia1ze the owners inveac.ent. He requesteel his property De prezoaed ~-6. Mr. J_ P. Hof~. 11414 South Stelling Road, requested that the area be maintained in a rural.ode. Be also felt that Rl-6 zoning would max- imize the property CNDer8 profit at time of sale. Other property ~~. requesting the RJ-~ zoning were Arthur R. Scbaidt. 11420 South Stell1DB Road; Roy HIehe, 1~358 South Stelling Road and Bob Schey, 10762 South Stelling Joad. It was moved by CoaDc. Sparks, seconded by Cowc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those present to close the public hearing. It was moved by Co1m<:. Plungy, seconded by CoImC. Sparks and passed unan- imously by those present to approve the application pe~ Planning Colllllis- sion Resolution 1"0. 2118, _nded to read "City of Cupertino Rl-6" zoning. It was moved by CoUDC. Sparks, seconded by Cowc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those present to grant a Negative Declaration for Application 34-Z-80. !t was moved by Couac. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those present Lv read Ordinance No. 1045 by title only and the City Clerk's readiDB to constitute the first reading, as amended. 4. Application 3S-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Bollinger Road/Stelling Road): Prezonlng approximately 8 gross acres from Santa Clara County AI-lac (Agricultural/Resi~ential, one acre minimum lot size) zone to City of Cupertino Rl-6 (Residential, Single-family, 6,000 sq. ft. mini_ lot size) zone and Environmental Review: The Planning C~ion rec~nds the granting of a Negative Declaratio The subject property is located between the westerly most terminus of Bollinger Road and Stelling Road. Recommended for approval. (a) First readiug of Ordinance No. 1046: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Se~tion 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Pre zoning Approximately 8 Gross Acres frLm Santa Clara County AI-lac Zone to City of Cupertino Rl-6 Zone; Located between the Westerly Host Terminus of Bollinger Road and Stelling Road." Mr. John Mangano, 10716 South Stelling Road. requested RI-6 zoning as did Mr. John Delg~do, 11400 South Stelling Road and Mr. Bob Schey, 10762 South Stelling Road. It was moved by COUDC. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those present to close the public hearing. CC-513 Page 3 Public hearing closed 34-Z-80 approved as amended Negative Dec. for 34-Z-80 First reading of Ord. 1045 as amended Public hearing closed CC-513 P.4 Z ng alllended Reopen public hearina MIIlUTES OF TIlE AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COUNCIL MEETIIIG It vas lIOVed by CoUDC. Sparb....·_oadecI,.".CIaIIàIi.,,'!'laav'~.__ ø..SOIIÜS:,CO;I1i:fÞ..~""'~·"':Ubå at tbac:U-." It vas moved by Counc. Sparks, eeconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to reopen the public hearing. Mr. Ed Jauch, 10760 South Stelling load, owner of 1.8S acres in the area asked how consistent the 6,000 sq. ft. would be. Public hearing 1t vas moved by Counc. Plungy, secoaded by Counc. Sl'arks and passed closed unanimously by those present to close the public hearing. Approve Rl-6 zoning Negative Dec. for 35-Z-80 35-Z-80 approved as amended First reading O~d. 1046 a ended , . It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. PIUDgy and passed unanimously by those present to approve Rl-6 zoning. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to grant the Negative Declaration for Application 35-Z-80. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, eeconded by Counc. PIlD1gy and passed unanimously by those present to approve Application 35-Z-80 per Planning eo-ission Resolution No. 2119, amended to read "Rl-6". It was moved by Counc. Sparks, secMJded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to read Ordinance No. 1046 as amended to read "Rl-6" by title only and the City Clark's reading to constitute the first reading. 5. Application 36-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Stelling Road): Prezoning approximately 28 gross acres from Santa Clara County A (Exclusive Agricultural) and AI-lac (Residential and Agricultural, one acre minimum lot size) zone to City of Cupertino A (Agricultural), T (Transportation) and Rl-6 (Residential, Single-family, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) zone and Environmental Review: The Planning Commission recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. The subject property is located on the east and west side of Stelling Road northerly of the intersection with Orion Lane in the north- west quadrant of Stelling Road and Orogrande Place between Stelling Road and November Drive; and on the east side of Stelling Road opposite Carriage Circle and adjacent to Jollyman Park. Recom- mended for approval. (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1047: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Prezoning Approximately 28 Gross Acres from Santa Clara County A Zone to City of (upertino A, T and RI-6 Zones; Located on the East and West Side of Stelling Road Northerly of the Inter- section with Orion Lane; in the Northwest Quadrant of Stelling Road and Orogrande Place between Stelling Road and November Drive; and on the East Side of Stelling Road Opposite Carriage Ci rcle and Adj acent to Jollyman Pa rk. " . . . HIIIUTES OF THE AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COUNCIL MEEnNG Claire Perusino, a resident of South Stelling Road, reqcested 11-6 zonins rather than 11-7.5. It vaa moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. PlwSY and paased unan- iõllOusly by tbose present to close the public hearing. It was JIIDved by Counc. S..arks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed UDaD- iJIIDualy by those present to grant a Negative Declaration for Application 36-Z-80. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unan- imously to approve Application 36-Z-80 per Planning Commission Resolution No. 2170 amended to read "11-6" rather than "11-7.5". It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Cowc. Plungy and passed unan- imo"sly by those present to read Ordinance No. 1047 as amended by title o~ly Jnd the City Clerk's reading to constitute the first reading. 6. Application 37-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Mariani Packing Plant): Prezoning approximately 27 gross acres from Santa Clara County HL-lac (Light Industrial, one acre minimum lot size) zone to City of Cuper- tino P (Planned Development with Residential, 20-35 dwelling units per gross acre intent) zone and T (Transportation) Zone. Environ- mental Review: The Planning Co_ission recommends the gran tine of a Negative Declaration. Said property is located on the southeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard. (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1048: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending S..ction 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Prez;>Qins Approximately 27 Grosa o\cres from Santa Clara County Ml-lac Zone to City of Cupertino P Zone; Located on the Southeast Corner of Homes tead Road and De Anza Boulevard." It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plunsy and passed unan- imously by those present to close the publi~ hearing. It was moved by Counc. Plungy. seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unan- imously by those present to grant a Negative Declaration for Application 37-z-80. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unan- imously by those present to approve Application 37-Z-80 per Planning Commission Resolution No. 2121. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unan- imously by those present to read Ordinance No. 1048 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the first reading. C-513 age 5 Public hearing closed Nega ti ve Dec. for 36-Z-80 36-Z-80 approved as amended First reading of Ord. 1047 Public hearing closed Negative DeL. for 37-Z-80 37-Z-80 approved First reading of Ord. 1048 ... \ ..f . CC-513 paw . Public hearing closed Negative Dec. for 39-Z-80 39-Z-80 approved .t reading of Ord. 1049 HlRIJTI!S OF THE AUGUST 2), 1980 '=I'r.' COUNCIL MD'l'ING 7. ApplicatiOD 39-Z-80 of City of CU h!rtino (Mann Drive/Adriaøa Avenue): Pre zoning approximately 45.7 acres presently zoned Santa Clara CountY Rl-lO (One family resielence, 10,000 sq. ft. mint.D lot size) Zone to City of Cupertino Rl-IO (Residential, Single-familv, 10.000 aq. ft. mini_ lot ,ize) zODe and Environ- mental Rev..ew: The PlanDing Co.-1saion r.~enda the granting of a Ne!\8tive Decl81~¡;~.OQ. The subject property consista of tooae unincorporated parcela (~onting Adriana Avenue from a point approximately 200 ft. northerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard to the northerly terwdaua of Adriana Avenue and those unincorporated properties fronting Mann Drive fr~~ a point appro~mately 175 ft. northerly of Steveos Creek Boulevard to a poi""\t approximateJ.y 130 ft. northerly of Doa Palos Court and including ail unincor- porated parcels fronting Dos Palos Court, Meadovview Lane, Corte Madera Lane, Woodbury Drive, Monte Court, Gardenview Lane and Oakview Lane. Rec~ended for approval. (a) Firs~ reading of Ordinance No. 1049: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section I of Ordinance No. 2 by Prezoning Approxt.ately 45.7 Acres Presently Zoned Santa Clara County Rl-IO Zone to City of Cupertino Rl-IO Zone; Consists rZ Those Unincorporated Parcels Fronting Adriana Avenue from a Point Approximately 200 Ft. Northerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard to tde Northerly Terminus of Adriana Avenue and Those Unincorporated Properties Fronting Mann Drive from a Point Approxtaately 175 Ft. Northerly of Stevens Creek Boule- var¿ to a Point Approximat.ly 130 Ft. Northerly of Dos Palos Court and Including Ali Unincorporated Parcels Fronting Dos Palos Court, Meadowview Lane, Corte Madera Lane, Woodbury Drive, Monte Court, "ardenview Lane and Oakview Lane." Mr. Tom Peterson, 10196 Adria~a Avenue, inquired as to what will happen with the }ld gas stations along Stevens Creek Boulevard. H~ also mentioned difficulty of driving onto Stevens Creek Boulevard coming out of Adriana. Roy Hampton, 21821 Oakview Lane, inquired about walking access. Lee Cheney, 10221 Adriana Avenue, suggested tbe name nAdri~n2_n..." for the street when the redesign occurs. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed ~nanimously by those present to close the public hearing. ~t was moved by Counc. Plungy. seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed ~nanimously by those present to grant a Negative Declaration for Applica- tion 39-Z-80. It wa3 moved by Counc. Plungy. seco~ded by Counc. Sparks and passeò :lnanimously by those present to approve Applicatio'l ]9-·Z-80 !Jer Planning Comcission Resolution No. 2122. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by those present to read Ordinance No. 1049 hy title only and the City Clerk's reading to c0nsti~~t~ the first reading. '.,,:,".~' . MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 28, 1980 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8. Application 4G-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Stevena Creek Boulevard/ iio:;nta Viata): Prezoniug and lezonina approximately 25 acr.. con- sis~ing of 21 acres from Santa Clara County CN (Neighborhood Co-.er- cial), ML (Light Industrial), City' of Cupertino P (Planned Develop- ment with co.mercial and offic. intent), City of Cupertino CG (Gen- eral Co_rcial), and City of Cupertino ML (Light Industrial); to City of Cupertino P (Planned lkIvelo~nt with Co_rcial and Inci- dental Industrial and/or Residential intent) zone. The aubjllCt properties are generally located on the north side of Stwellll Creek Boulevard beginning at a point approxi..tely 600 ft. v.øterly of Mann Drive to the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way and southerl of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Orange Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way. 4.15 acre from Sant& Clara County Rl-8 (One family residence, 8,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size), R3-2.4 (Low density multiple dwellings, 16 unit per net acre), R3-4 (Low density multiple dwellings) and City of Cupertino Rl-7.5 (Residential, Single-family, 7,500 aq. ft. minim lot size) to City of Cupertino P (Planned Developmant .ith residen- tial 4.4-12 dwelling units p~r groaa acre intent) zone. Tha subject property is located in the sontbwest quadrant of Stevena Creek Boul- evard and Orange Avenue. . 1.0 acre frolD Santa Clara County R3-4 (Low density multiple dwellings and City of Cupertino ML (Light Industrial) to City of Cupertino RI-6 (Residential, Single-family, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) zone. The subject property is located in the northeast quadrant of Pasa- dena Avenue and Loait_ Avenue. .85 acre from Santa Clara County ML (Light Industrial) to City of Cupertino ML (Light Industrial) zone. The subject property is lo- cated on the west side of Imperial Avenue approximately 100 ft. south erly of Granada Avenue. Euvironmental Review: The Plan:1ing Conaio- sion recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. RecOJDDended ior approva1. . (a) First reading of Ordinance ~. 1050: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Pre- zoning and Rezoning Approximately 28 Acres Consisting of 21 Acres from Santa Clara County CN, ML, City of Cupertino P, City of Cupertino CG and City of Cupertino ML to City of Cupertino P Zone; Generally Located on the North Side of Stevens Creek 30ulevard Beginning at a Point Approximately 600 Ft. westerly of Mann Drive to the Southern Pa~ific Railroad Right of Way and Southerly of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Ora3ge Avenue and the Southerr. Pacific Railroad Right of Way; 4.15 Acre from Santa Clara County RI-8, R3-2.4, and R3-4 and City of Cupertino RI-7.5 to City of Cupertino P Zone; Located in the Southwest Quadrant of Stevens Creek Boulevard Gnd Orange Avenue; 1.0 Acre fro~ Santa Clara County R3-4 and City of Cupertino ML to City of Cupertino RI-6 Zone; Located in the Northea~t Quadrant of Pasadena Avenue ar.d Lomita Avenue; .85 Acre from Santa Clara County ML to City of Cupertino ML Zone; Located on the West Side of Imperial Av~nue Approximately 100 Ft. Southerly of Granada Avenue." CC-S13 Pege 7 CC-513 pa. Pub:!.ic heari closed Negative Dec. for 40-Z-80 40-Z-80 approved First reading of Ord. 1050 . Public hearin closed Negative Dec. for 41-Z-80 4l-Z-80 approved First reading of Ord. 1051 . .- :.:;:~:~ÇT~"";~" HIØUTES OF TIlE AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COURCIL MEETING Rutb roster, 10120 P~..elena Avenue, addressed Council re8llrelin¡ atreet ..!ntenance and fire hydrants. It vas moved by Counc. Sparks, -seconded by Counc. Pllmgy and passed unant.ously by those preser.t to close the public hearing. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, aeconelecl by Counc. Pllm!y anel passed unanimously by those present to grant a Regative Declaration for Appli- Cl"tÍDn 40-Z-80. I t was moved by CoIDIC. Sparks, seconde-J by CoIDIC. Plungy and pa..sed Imanimously by those present to approve Application 40-Z-80 per Planning Commission ResolutioL No. 2123. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by tho.... present to read Ordinance No. 1050 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the first reading. 9. Application 41-Z-80 of City of Cupertino (Orange Avenue/McClellan Road): Pre zoning Approximately .7 Acre from Santa Clara County Rl-6 (One family residence, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size> and Santa Clara ColDlty Rl-8 (One family residence, 8,000 sq. ft. minimun lot size) zone to City of Cupertino RI-7.5 (Residential, Single- family, 7,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size> zone and Environmental Review: The Pl.a::ming eo-ission reco_ds the granting of a Negative Declarati.m. The subject property consists of several unincorporated parcels located in the northwest quadrant of Mc- Clellan Roaè' and Orange AvenIV-. Recommended for approv'Ü. (a) First reading of Ordinarr.e No. 1051: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino A~ending Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Pre zoning Approximately .7 Acre from Santa Clara County Rl-6 and Santa CI,.ra County Rl-8 Zone to City of Cupertino Rl-7.5 Zone; ConsIsts of Several Unincorporated Parcels Locate<' in the Northwest Quadra"t of McClellan Road and Orange Avenue." It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by those present to close the public hearing. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by those present to grant a Negative Declaration for Ap~lica- tion 4l-Z-80. It was moveå by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by those present to approve Application 41-Z-80 per Planuing Commission Resolution No. 2124. It was moved by Counc. PJungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unani~usly by those present to read Ordinance No. 1051 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the first reading. -,: ~Y~:"'~~~~.~:t(.o:;,,¡;;, . """"~'--"""'~'>~II"'1""",,,,,~......,~~"'9t."""".'"'''~''':::<í'.~~~~,~'7~'I'!'C:~--:7<!-~ "-', "·.¡·C-':,' ·:".'~<:-:,"'-;-i ,:,,<." ,', ':/¡':>#'··"~~-f.j':."-""'":/;"Y',,"i"~f7~~~~';' "":;:"'1' :.: -'''::> -; :~",'> . H1JIUTES OF THE AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COU1fCIL huIUIG 10. Application 42-;:-80 of ~ity of Cupertino (Bubb ltoad/PUllpkin Drive)1 Pre_ina approxillate1y 1.0 arc" acre frea Santa Clara County A (Excloabe Agricultural) aDd AI-lac (Agricu1taraI-...ldenUaI) to City of Cupertino Rl-7.5 (leaicleDtial, Sina1e-f8ll11y, 7,500 sq. ft. 111m- lot size) zone .Dd EDvir_ta1 lIev1..1 The PI_iDS Co.. lI1.eloD rec~a the p'autiða of a "ptive D6claration. The aubject property is located adjacent to aucI MIItedy of Bubb Road approxiutely 50 ft. northerly of Pumpkia Drive. "c~ed for approval. Ca) First reading of Ordinance Bo. 1052: "An Ordinauce of the City of Cupertino Amendina Sectioa I of Ordi_e No. 2 by Pre- zODing ApproxV:01te1y 1.0 Gross Acre froa Santa Clara County A and Al-lac to City of Cupertino RI-7.S Zone; Located AdjaceDt to aud Easterly of Bubb load ApproxiBate1y SO Ft. Northerly of PUlllPIdD Drive." It vas moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by CoDDC. Sparks and passed unan- i80usly by those present to close the public hearina. It was IIIOved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by CoImC. Sparks and passed Iman- i80usly by those present to grant a Hegative DeclbratioD for Applicåtion 42-Z-80. . T.t vas moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by CoDDC. Sparks and passed wan- i80usly by tbose present to approve Application 42-Z-80 per PI aDDing Co-.tssion Resolution No. 2125. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Colmc. Sparks and passed wan- ilM)usly by those present to read Ordinance No. 1052 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to consritute the first reading. RECESS: 9:30-9:45 p.m. 11. Applicatiou 31-Z-80 of Woodspring, Inc. (Homestead Road): Rezoning approxiaately 3 Gross Acres from KL (Light Industrial) to P (Planned Deve10pllent with medium to high density residential, 10-20 dw..Uing units per gross acre intent) zone and Environ&ental Review: The Planning CommissioD recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration The subject property is located on the south side of Homestead Road approxiamtely 300 ft. easterly of Foothill Expressway (opposite FaIle - leaf Lane). Recommended for approval. (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1053: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Sectiou 1 of Ordinance No. 7. by Rezoning Approximately 3 Gross Acres from ML to P Zone; Located on the South Side of Homestead Road Approximately 300 Ft. Easterly of Foothill Expressway (Opposite Fallenleaf Lane)." . CC-S13 Paae 9 Public hearing closed Negative Der.. for 42-Z-80 42-Z-80 approved First reading of Ord. 1052 CC-5:3 1'.10 pu!c closed hearing Senior unit requirelllent Negative Dec. for 31-Z-80 31-Z-80 approved First reading of Ord. 1053 Neí tive Dec. for 17-U-80 17-U-1s0 a.oved I MINUTES OF TIlE AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COUBCIL MEETING PLANNING APPLICATIONS 12. Applicatioa n-U-80 of VoocIaprins, IDe. (IIoMateecl a.oad)1 Ua. Permit to construct a 67 unit reaieleotial cODcloa:l.D1_ bul1dina and EavironmentaI Review: The PI8DDing Co..tsa10D rsc~a the granting of a IlepUve Declaration. The subject prOPerty is located on th. aouth aiele of Homestead Road approxiaately 300 ft. easterly of Footh11_ izpreøsvay (opposite 'allen1eaf Lane) . ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COIMITTEE APPLI.::ATIONS 13. Application UC-5I,471.1 - Woodaprins, Inc. requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping and Ughting for a propos'" 67-unit condom1nillll developaent. Said property 18 situated on the south side of Bo_atead Roael, easterly of Foothill Boule- vard, in a P (Planned Development) zoning district. Recoøaended for approval. Mr. John Hanna, 525 University Avenue, Palo Alto, attorney for the developers, askeel Council if they hael any qu~stions. Mr. Gary Johnson, 125 Willow Road, Menlo Park, requested that Council waive any requirl!lllent that a certain number of units aust be sold to seniors. It waa moved by Counc. Sparks. seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to close the public bearing. It was moved by Counc. i'lung¡. seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously b7 thoae present that the senior unit requirement is not implemented for the 20.94 units per acre. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to grant a Negative Declaration for the project. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimo~sly by those present to approve to approve Application per Planning Commission Resolution No. 2127. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to read Ordinance No. 1053 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the first reading. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by those present to grAnt a Negative ~~claration for I7-U-80. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously by those present to approve Applica~ion 17-U-80 per Planning Commission Resolution No. 2128. . KIIIUTES OF THB AUGUST 25, 1980 CITY COUNCIL HEETIJIG It vila lluved by Counc. Sparks, seconeled by Counc. PIUIIIY and paaaed UI18D- imoualy by those preaent to approve Appli~'~'1.411i»,..,~tted. NEW BUSIHESS 14. Consideration of poasible &nnexation of area deaignated ''Monta Vista 80-34" . <a) Re8olution No. 5387: "A Resolution of the City CoUllcil of the City of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings for the Ann...tion of the Island Designated '!f<¡nta Vista (West) 80-34', Approximately 57 Acres; Generally Located East of Foothill Boulevarel, West of Riviera Road and North of McClellan Road." The City Kønager read a letter received from Hr. Abel for the record. This letter protested any annexation to the City of Cupertino. It was moved by COunc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and pa8sed unan- imously by those present to adopt Resolution No. 5387 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 15. Consideration of possible annexation of area designated "Pasadena 80-35", . (a) Resolution No. 5388: "A Resolution of the City Council of the 'ity of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of he Island lIesignated 'Pasadena 80-35', Approximately S.7 Acres; Generally Located South of Stevens Creek Boulevard, North of Lomita Avenue and East of Pasadena Avenue." It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unan- imously by those ~resen~ to adopt Resolution No. 5388 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 16. Consideration of possible annexation of area designated "Orange/ McClellan 80-37". (a) Resolutior. ,:0. 5389: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of the Island Designated 'Orange/McClellan 80-37', Approximately .7 Acre; Generally Located in the Northwest Quadrar.t of Mc- Clellan Road and Orange Avenue." It w~s moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by COilnc, Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to adopt Resolution No. 5389 and approve the Site Specific Plan. . 17. Consideration of pos9ible annexation of area designated "Stelling/ Bollinger 80-40". (a) Resolution No. 5390: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings for the Annexation of the Island Designated 'Stelling/~ollinger 80-40', Approximately 6.55 Gross Acres; Located between the Westerly Most TerLinus of Bolling"r Ro,,': and Stelling Road." CC-513 Page 11 IC-Sl,471. 1 a'þproved Protest latter read Res. No. 5387 adopted Res. No. 5388 adopted Res. No. 5389 adopted . CC-513 P.12 R No. 5390 adopted Continued . Res. No. 5392 adopted Res. )10. 5393 adopted . . ·T"'~"""'i~j!'~' MINUTES OF TIlE ADGUST 25, 1980 CITY COONCIL MlŒTI1fG It vas moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Coone. PlUU81 eel p..... unanimous1.y by those present to adopt Reaolutiun No. 5390 and approye the Site Specific Plan. 18. Con.øideration of possible allD8xstion of area designated "West Valley Industrial/Gaaliaaao 80-41". (a) Resolution No. 5391: "A Rnolut1on of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings for the Annexa- tion of the Island Deaignated 'West Valley Industri.ll GagUasso 8~41', A;tproximately .5 Gross Acree; Located Adjacent to and Northerly of McClellan Road Approximately 700 Ft. East of Bubb Road Adjacent to the Unimproved State Freeway 85 Right of Way." It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to continue this item to the regular meeting of September 2, 1980. 19. Consideration of possible annexation of area designated "Stelling 80-42" . (a) Resolution No. 5392: "A Resolution of tlte City Council of the City IJf Cupertino Initiating Procee.:ings for the J.-- tion of the Island Deaignated 'Stelling 80-42', Approxi8ately 4.85 Acres; Located on t"- Southwest Comer of Stelling Road and Orion Lane." It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those present to adopt Resolution No. 5392 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 20. Consideration of possible annexation "f area designated "Stelling 8~43". (a) Resolution No. 5393: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings for the Annexa- tion of the Island DBaignated 'Stelling 80-43', Approximately 2.2 Acres; Generally Lccated East of Stelling Road along the West Valley Freeway." It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously by those pre5ent to adopt Resolution No. 5393 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 21. ':onsideration of possible annexation of area designated "Stelling ¡;~44". (a) Resolution No. 5394: "A Resolution of the City COUl'cil of the City of Cupertino Initialing Proceedings for the Annexa- tion of the Island Designated 'Stelling 80-44'. Approximately 6.3 Acres; Located on the East Side ot Stelling Road Approxi- mately 150 Ft. Northerly of Shadowhill Lane." . . . . MINUTES OF TIlE AUGUST 25. 1980 CITY COUNCIL MU'rDIG It was moved by Counc. Plt.ngy, seconded by Counc. Sparks aDC! paaaeel unan- imously to adopt Resolution No. 5394 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 22. Consideration of possibl& annexation of area designated "Stelling 8()-45" . (a) Resolution.fe. 5395: "A Resolution of the City ColDldl of the City of Cupertino Initiating ProceediDaa for the Annexation of the Island Designated 'Stelling 8()-4S', Approxtaately 2 Acres; Located on the East Side of Stelling RDad Oppoaite Carriage Circle &ncI Adjacent to Jollyman Park." It was moved by Counc. S:>arks, seconded by Coone. Plongy and passed unan- imously by those present to adopt Resolution No. 5395 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 23. Consideration of possible anncation of area designated "Mann 80-32". (a) Resolution No. 5403: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Initiating Proceedings :~r the Annexation of the Island Designated 'Mann 80-32', Approximately 52.7 Acres; Consisting of Those Unincorporated Parcels Fronting Adriana Avenue and Mann Drive Including all Unincorporated Parcels l'ronting Dos Palos Court, Keadowviev Lane. Corte Madera Lane, Woodbury Drive, MusIli' Court, wrdenviev Lane and Oakview Lane and Including the Area Bounded on the north by Stevens Creek Boulevard, on the South by Granada, on the East by Orange Avenue and on the West by Byrne Avenue." It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unan- imously by those present to adopt Resolution No. 5403 and approve the Site Specific Plan. 24. Report pettaining to Cable TV franchise with the City ~f Cupertino. This matter was continued to the regular meeting of Tuesday. September 2, 1980. 25. Report regarding parking facility at Cupertino Civic Center. -513 age 13 Res. No. 5394 adopted Res. No. 5:>95 adopted Res. No. 5403 adopted Continued It was moved by Coune. SparL~, seconded by Ccuac. Plungy and passed unan- Continued imously by those present to ~ontinue this item to the regular meeting of September 2, 1980. STAPF REPORTS It was moved by Coune. Sparks, seconded by Counc. ~ll;r.gy and p.:l.ssed unan- imously by those present to accept the dedication from the Tap Room on Stevens Creek Boulevard and set the reimbursement amount at $10,000. It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. PL..<y "nd passed unan- imously by those present to take the following legisia:ive actions: Dedication accepted from Tap Room Legislat ive actions CC-513 P.14 National League of Ci ties Has October Counc. meeting . . "~'"",,::-(,", .'.:~''-~~~~''.?''r:' "'ë':~~i~~:>~""" " .' MIBIITES OF TIlE AUGUS'l' 2S. 1980 CITY t:OUItCn. ØU"1£<fG No action - AS 2376~ support - SB 1352. SB 1m. ;.t;A 14. ø 611,;..ø 1948; oppoae - SB 1960, SB 467. AS 3046. .u 2674. .u 260:J. By cOII8ens..., Council request'" chac cha tol1__ it.. r_eiftd frOll tbe Rational Lea... of Cfti.. be. ...dIf1i1't'cf 1ft tr. sqt.... 2. 1980 meeting: ~~ .~~~~~~!Ø' (1) Kess Transit. Council requested that a review of the due of the aecODd CðaødJ _Cia. ia October be agendized for Sept8ber 2. 1980. At 10:2S p;m., the meetiD8 vas adjoumecl tð Septemller 2. 198C) wt 6145 p.m. L1-.ø ~~..~ Cicy Clezk