Loading...
CC 01-17-83 . .. '¡'-"'.' '--."'" . . . . . . ~:·~·"~q¿:F:f~,i~ ';~ ~?~ . CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE or CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 252-4505 KImES or THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD ON JANUARY 17, 1983 IN THE COUNCIL C1WIBER, CITY BALL CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA Mayor Gatto called the meeting to order in Council Chamber at 6:45 p.m. SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL Counc. Present: Johnson, Plungy, Rogers, Sparks, Mayor Gatto Staff Present: Acting City Manager Viskovich City Clerk Cornelius Director of Planning and Development Sisk Director of rinance Snyder (left at 7:25 p...) Director of Parks and Recreation Dowling City Attorney Kilian (8:35 p.m.) Assistant City Engineer Whitten (left at 7:05 p.m.) CC-598 Pale 1 Mayor Gatto welcomed visitors from our Sister City, Toyokawa, Japan. Toyokawa Counc. Plungy presented the viaitors with gifts. The Mayor of Toyokawa visitors thankec:' ~be City for its hospitality and invited ten junior high school btudents along with two or three chaperones to visit the City of Toyokawa. Other than air fare to Japan, Toyokawa will take care of expenses incurred. STAFF REPORTS I. Oral reports by staff members and submission of written reports. The City Manager's Report was continued until the arrival of the City Attorney. It was announced that publie hearings will be conducted February 7, 1983 to consider a garbage rate increase and a water rate increase. (City Clerk's Note: Assistant City Engineer Whitten left at 7:0S p.m.) CONSENT CALENDAR Counc. Rogers removed Item No. 13. It was moved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Rogers and passed unanimously to approve the bal- ance of the Consent Calendar. Garbage rate and water rate increases Consent Calen- dar approved Ce8 Page Z . . I 1 ".._~ ... , "',': .' '~'~'~1':!" , MlIlUTES OF THE JANDARY 17, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7. Resolution No. 6015: "A Resolution of the City ColIIICll of tlw Cicy of Cupertino Allowing Certai~ Claims and Demandø 'ayable in to. Amounts and from the Funds as Hereinafter Described for Salart.a and W'Iges for the Payroll Period Endins December 28, 1982." 8. Resolution No. 6016: "A Resolution of the City CouIIcil of the City of Cupertino Allowing Certain Claims and Dellanda ,.,able in the Amounts am! from the Funds as Hereinafter Deacribed for General and Miscellaneous Expenditures for the Period Ending December 23, 1'182." 9. Resolution No. 6017: "A Resolution of the ~ity Council of the City of Cupertino Allowing Certain Claims and Demands Payable in the Amounts and from the Funds as Hereinafter Described tor General and Miscellaneous Expenditures for the Period Ending January 7, 1983." 10. Resolution No. 6018: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cup~rtino Approving Improvement Agreement of 'roperty Located on Stevens Creek Boulevard East of Byrne Avenue. Developer, rerry 8rown, Authorizing Execution of Improvement Agreement." II. Resolution No. 6019: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupercino Approving the Final Map and Improvement Plan') of Tract No. 73Z5 Located on the North Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard between B1>mey Avenu" and Randy Lane. Developer, Abbass Golpour, Parvin Golrour, Ali Yazdanmanesh, and Sakineh Yazdanmanesb, Ac~epting Certain Easements, Authorizing Signing of Final Map and Improve- ment fl~ns. Authorizing the Execution of Agreement ir. Conneetion Therewith." lZ. Resolution No. 60Z0: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Approving Parcel Map of Property Lo~ated on Carmen Road at Hoo 800 Court. Developer, Gerry Federspiel, James and Ursula Kaschmitter. Authorizing Execution of Improvement Agree- ment, Author!zing Signing of Parcel Map." 13. Remo"ed. 14. Application HC-Sl.SO'1..2 - Wayne Sargent - Requesting architectural and site approval to construct a single-family residential house in a planned development zoning district. The subject property is located on the north side of Orogrande Place, approximately 4'1.S ft. west of Stelling Road. Recommended for approval. lS. Resolution No. 6023: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Setting Time and Place for Public Hearing to Conside~ a Raise in Water Rates." 16. Resolution No. 6024: "A Resolution of the City Council of tÞe City of Cupertino Approving Parcel Map and Imprevement Plans of . . . ··""·-"':('~::::(~"';.'v~::~~):·~;··,,o;~~_:;' MINlJTES or THE JANDARY 17, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 16. (contintw,d) Property Located At Lomita and I.o,perlal Avenue; nev"loper. Antonio and Jessica Reyes;Autho~1zin¡ Execution of IIIprov..-nc Agree.nt; Authorizing Signing of Parcel Map and IlI IroWMllt Plans." 17. Acceptaace of 1IUDicipal iølpr~nt.: Margaret1cb Construction, Ice. - lOllS Crescent Road. , 18. Minutes of the regular City Council Meting of January 3, 1983. (CC-597) Vote Ke~r& of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT : ABSTAIN: Johnson, Plungy, Rogers, Sparks, Gatto None None None ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 13. Resolution No. 6022: "A Resolu,lon of the City Council of ehe City of Cupertino Superseding Resolutio~ No. 6011 and Initiating Preliminary Procedures for Reorganization betwe~ Cupertino, San Jose and the County cf Santa Clara in Accordance with the District Reorganization Act of 1965." It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously to ad~pt Resolution No. 6022. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 20. Members of t.~_ audience regarding matters not on the agenda. Mr. Walter Ward, General Manager, Vallco Fashion Park, requested clarification of the minutes of tlw C·.)\:I1cil_eting of November 23, 1982 regarding the undevelopeò land of Vallco being removed from constraints He stated that Vallco would ~ike to start the development of a hotel. He urged staff to Wúrk with Vallco regarding the removal of constraints prior to the adoption of the General Plan. He ~dS informed by Mayor Gatto that this could be done through the use permit process. The Director of Planning and Development informed Hr. Ward that should he file an application to amend Vallco's use permit, it could run through the process concurrently with the General Plan Amendment. Mr. Ward also addressed Council regarding payments. He sta~~d that he has approximately $400,000 due from the City from an asses~ment district which had been closed a year and a "~lf ágO. He was informed that the audit was not completed. Di~ector of Finance Snyde~ ir.formed Council that he has spoken with Mr. Ward and informed him thae the process i~ just about complete. Mr. Ward should receive a check from the City by the end of February. Mr. Snyder sent a letter to the bonding attorney. He stated that L;e amount is approximately ~:~ CC-598 Page 3 Res. No. 60ZZ adopted -.,:--;:"" "","·""'ê~~~r;>if~' '" '¡"-.,-, .,'. ~ .~_ '. -,,'.'s:, .' . "\' , _ , -; ",j-.'.'-<-'" ' ::~, ~-,.i-"!~ ,-~ .8 Page 4 MINUTES OF THE JANDARY 17, 1983 CITY COtJNCIL MEETING $358,000. The I!'¡()nies have been invested and the assessment district is currently earning money. (City Clerk's Note: Director of rinance S~Jder,left at 7:~5 p.m.) PUBLIC HEARINGS 21. Appeal of MAC denisl for a aip perait for Micchell Bros. Auto- motive Distributors. Application BC-5I,582.1. Direct.or of Planning and Deve~t Sisk reviewed the appeal and the arplication with the City Council. Mr. Ken Mitchell, applicant. 1afo~d Council that he is planning to pay for installation snd desiga of the sign. However, he had told others in the center that the .... of their business could be added if they so desired. He stated tbat he is willing to do what ASAC desires regarding size, colors. etc. . Council expressed concern regardiag the size of "Auto Parts" being as large as the center's name. 1Ir. Mitchell infor1iled Council th.'it ASAC had requested they be the S8IIIe size. He expressed the feelL~ that the':e is a need for tbe sip in the shopping center and that it is good for the cOlllDUnity. Also, the ceuter was not named prior to the pIau for installation of a sign. ~ told Council that two building signs would come down. Ann Anger, Manta Vista, stated t~. she felt Mitchell Bros. should not have the whole sign for themselves. She request~d that Monta Vista be upgraded and that when applicants request SiSDS, it is a good time to ask property owners to upgrade the area. She felt that the ten tenants of the center should diYide the signs. She did not care for the color or material planned to be used. She felt it looked like a billboard. Helen Lu, Northern Neon Sign Co. of San Francisco, reviewed the proposed sign ,:i.il Council and was available to answer any questions. ~aury Nelsen, 21801 Stevens Creek Boulevard, said that he wou!d like 1,0 see the sign more in the the theme of Menta Vista. Wes Williams, Monta V1sta He_owners Association, felt that the "Auto Parts" portion was too large for the sign. He aho expressed concern regarding wind blowing the sign over as well as vandalism to the sign. de felt that the theme to be used in Monta Vista wculd be with more natural materials. He also expressed opposition to an 1nternally lighted sign. He expressed agreement with Mrs. Anger in that the sign does look like a billboard. . Helen Lu stated that the size would be approved by a structural engineer. She informed Councii that the proposed si~n is not plexiglass but a high impact material. . . þ MINUTES OF THE JANDARY 17, 1983 CITY COmrCIL MEETING Ken Kitchell said he W3S not opposed to a smaller aign. He felt a larger sign is better for retail business. The light would b.. on a timer. He stated that he is willing to I:Iake the lettedng 81I81ler. He d cd point out to Council that he was paying for the entire sign. In respect to the size of '~tchell Bros." Mr. Mitchell stated that he would reduce the size of those letters as other tenants requested a sign on the board. Mrs. Anger expre&sed concern regarding 1IIIprovements. She reiterated that this is the time to ask for 1IIIprovements. She feels that business people have an obligation to the c~ity. I.' was IIIOved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Plungy and paolsed unanimously to close the public hearing. Discussion followed among Councilmeabers regarding a sign and street program for Monta Vista as well as the po~sibility of requesting cer- tain improvements when a sign application is considered. It was IIOved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously to reopen the public hearin~. It was IIIOved by Counc. SPUD, seconded by Counc. Rogers and passed unanimously that staff report back on rebruary 7, 1983 regarding a sign and street ?rogram for MoLta Vista and consideration of this ap;>eal. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 22. Application 16-U-82 of Shell Oil Company (Howard Smith): Use Permit to construct a self-~ervice eashier's kiosk at an existing service station and Environmental Review, The project is cate- goricallyexempt, hence, no actioo is required. The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Homestead Road and Wolfe Road in a P (Planned Development with commercial intent) zoning district. Recommended for approval. Director of Planning and Developmeot Sisk reviewed the application with Co unc il. "-" CC-598 Page 5 Public hearing closed Public hearing reopened Menta Vista sign and street program It was move~ by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Johnson and passed l6-û-82 unanimously to approve Applicatiûn l6-U-82 per Plann1ng Commission Res- approved olution No. 2360. 23. Application 19-U-82 of John Vidovich (Dr. Joseph Brown): Use Permit to construct a 62,000 sq. ft., three-sto~y office building and Environmental Review: The Planning Commission recommends the granting of a Ne~ativ~ Declaration. The scbject property is located on the west side of De Anza ~oulevard approximately 250 ft. north of Lazan~o Urive and 450 ft south of Ma.iani Avenue in a P (Planned Develop~nt with commerci~l. light industrial and residential, 4-10 dwelling units per gross acre intent) zoning district. Recommended for denial. 'f\'\r}',.!~-:>~:,~~~~> ~: KINUTES OF THE JANUARY 17, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Director of Planning and Development Sisk reviewed the application for Council and pointed out that it is consistent with the North De ADza plan in regard to access. Discussion followed regarding the Planning Coaaisaion concerns and reason for recommendation for denial. John Vidovi.;h, developer, stated that the project puts together five parcels and eltLtlnates possible applications from five different owners. Mr. Vidovich stated that he was not asking for any bonus density. He said that ASAC did not deny the application but criticized the eleva- tions. The Planning COlllllission recommended denial based on the archi- tecture. He stated that it was a difficult site to work with and that the developer would be willing to have the elevations reviewed by ASAC again and if approved,proceed. He said that high quality meterials ~ were going to be used, and it would be a pleasing building. Director of Planning and Development Sisk reviewed the ASAC minutes with Council. . Denis Henmi, San Francisco, reviewed renderings with Council and said that the mechanical screen on the roof was serving as a point of archi- tectural interest. He also discussed a concern expressed by the Commission, i.e., the sameness as the other buildings slong De Anza Boulevard. (City Clerk's Note: City Attorney Kilian arrived at 8:35 p.m.) In regard to the "squared off" corner of the building, he felt it ereated an identity for the building where it is facing the most traffi~. It serves as an entry point of the site (not the building). Most visitors would arrive at the building via vehicle, not on foot. He showed slides of various buildings showing the use of different types of materials and answered questions from Council. Sylvia Kwan, partner of the architect, reviewed the setbacks with the Council. Discussion followed regarding the piece of property on which the auto shop is located. Dora Miller addressed Council stated that the shop had been planned to continue leasing. any real incentive to join i~ regarding the auto shop property. She leased by the same parties since 1967 and However, she felt they had not been given this particular project. they It was moved by Counc. Sparks to return the application to ASAC. The motion died for lack of a second. . Items discussed by Council were the following: Council expressed concern regarding the appearance of mass of building along De Anza Boulevard as proposed on the site. . ".-."',' "~'.. .'y" . MINUTES OF THE JANDARY 17, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING If.ayor Gatto stated that his main Critic1811 was the clo.e proxi- IÚty of the majority of the building to De Anza Boulevard. Council felt that entrances to the property should be identified more clearly. The feeling was expressed that the three puking spaces in the front were not appropriate there. Council felt that the site plan needed to be revised, but Council was not concerned regarding the material or overall design. A suggestion from the Council was that the L building be "flipped" over (not right against the property line) so that one leg of the L backs onto the property to the south which is the reMainder of the fish area of the nursery. That leg should back onto a land- scaped area rather than a d-rJvearea so, .tbat'81'een space _ld ,be combined. It was suggested that the architect open the center of the L so a landscaped area opens onto De Anza Boulevard. It was felt that another driveway could be acceptable with that particular configuration. . The Mayor requested that a drawing of the entire frontage of the area be presented. It was also suggested that with the redesiDn of the site plan the arehitect may wish to look at 30me refine- ments of the proposed building. It vas moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Johnson and passed unanimously to return the application to the Planning Commission for reconsideration of design issues. 24. Application 5-V-82 of Ranee R. Carlson and Jeraldine Mszzurco: Variance from Section 8.4 of the Rl (Residential Single-family) Zoning Ordinance to permit a 10 ft. rear yard setback for an addition to a single-family home where the remaining usable rear yard area will be less than required by Ordinance and Environ- mental Review: The project is categorically exempt, hence, no action is required. The subject property is located on the west side of Betlin Avenue between John Dn.ve and Clifford Drive at 849 Betlin Avenue in a RI-6 (Residential Single-family, 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) zoning district. Recommended for denial. þ (a) Resolution No. 60L1: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Granting a Variance to Ranee R. Carlson and Jeraldine Mazzurco from Section 8.4 of the Rl (Residential Single-family) Zoning Ordinance to Permit a 10 Ft. Rear Yard Setback for an Addition to a Single-family Home Where the Remaining Usaòle Rear Yard Area will be Less Than Rquired by Ordinance; Located on the West Side of Betlin Avenue between John ~~ae and Clifford Drive at 849 Betl1n Avenue in a Rl-6 (Residential Single-family, 6,000 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Size) Zoning District." ~~~''''4i;1?:~_:>~ CC-598 Page 7 19-U-82 returned to Planning Com. . Ca8 Page 8 l'iinute Order re variance procedure . Facilities tee waived for Kiwanis . ""_, ".-·c"·",·- ~;~'\<i"'!f,,;~">....~,...,;~~_~ê . ....~ ~->- <.\ >;~, -"" .. ..-,....,. MINUTES OF THE JANDARY 17, 1983 CIrt COUNCIL MEETING Director of Planning and Dev~lopment Sisk reviewed the request for variance with the Council and stated that there are alternatives available to the applicant that are consistent with the City's ordinance. Ranee Carlson, applicant, submitted a picture of a screen room and told the Council that it would be located off the kitchen. Discussion fo110WP.d regarding the findings and subconclusions nece.sary to grant a variancp.. It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously to send a Miaute Order to the Planning Director, the Planning Commission and appropriate staff members stating the following: For pUrp0BeR of detera1ning rear yard area for additions, take the existing area in back of the house as it is presently situated, and for any additions that are 10% or less in total area of the house in- cluding its attached garage, that addition can take place anywhere in that existing back yard area as strictly a deduction in the total area. Side yards adjacenc; to these small additions shall be included in the usable rear yard calculations. In any event, the remaining area would s~il1 not be less than 20 times the width of the lot as originally situated. If you have a lot with a varying width across the back (a lot that tapers) you take the average width for that depth to determine the IlUlitplier. The variance was removed from the calendar. Director of Planning and Development Sisk will review this interpretation with the City's ordinance. Should there be a eonf1ict, he will initiate proceedings to revise the ordinance. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMKITl'EB APPLICATIONS 25. None UNFINISHED BUSINESS '1.6. None NEW BUSINESS L7. Request for fee waiver of Monta Vista Community Center for Kiwanis Club fund raiser. It was moved by Counc. Sparks. seeonded by Counc. Rogers and passed unanimously to waive facilities use fees for the Kiwanis fund raiser to be held at the Monta Vista Community Center. 28. Request for waiver or reduction of park "in lieu" fee filed by Hugh F. Jackson. . . . .... .....~ .<;:..~ ::~~\';"1:'~''7''~.-:.rr._,~ ."-"C )'1'~;-:;- !~~''f(~'';~'~-';_':~o" . MINUTES CF THE JANDBY 17, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Acting City Manager Viskovich reviewed the request received fro. Mr. Jackson and the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. He stated that there was no hardship or extenuating circumstances in this par- ticular instance. M. Hugh Jackson (son of the Mr. Jackson requesting the waiver) stated that if the Council were unable to grant a waiver of park in lieu fees he would like a reduction of those fees. Mr. Viskovich infon.d Counci 1 of the formula used to assess the amount of fee. City Attorney Kilian informed Council that the property owner can get his own appraisal and sub~t that to the City. The applicant stat'd that he would go along with wh~t was said. He is planning to sell the property to his two sons and felt the selling price should be used as this would be fair. He was informed by the Aeting City Mana~r that thE fee is set by fair market values in the area. It was moved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Plungy and passed unanimously to deny the request of Mr. Jackson for a waiver or re- duction of the park dedication in lieu fee. 29. Review of taxi subsidy agreement with Outreach and Escort. Director of Parks and Recreation Dowling reviewed the proposed agree- ment with Council. Roberta G3rdello of Outreech and Escort, Inc. answered questions from Council regarding the necessary prescheduling and informed them that there would be immediate response in an emergency, especially a medical emergeney. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks and passed unanimously to endorse the proposed agreement with Outreach and Ex- cort, Inc. for the taxi subsidy services for fiscalyear 1983-1984. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 30. None ORDINANCES 31. Urgency Ordinance No. 1215; "An Ordinance of the City of Cuper- tino Adding Section 8.08.255, Vaccination of Dogs, to the Cuper- tino Municipal Code and Declaring the Urgency Thereof." It was ~ved by Coune. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers and passed unanimously to read Ordinance No. 1215 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the only reading thereof. "-' CC-598 Pap 9 Waiver of in- lieu park fee denied Agreement for taxi subsidy services Reading of Urgency Ord. No. 1215 . . .98 Page 10 Urgency Ord. 110. 1Z15 enacted Second reading of Ord. 1208 Ord. No. lZ08 enacted . Second reading of Ord. lZl" Ord. No. 121Z enacted Second read ing of Ord. 1213 Ord. No. L~13 enacted . ,~"1;~":"::'J'i'~'''' --,,~> - < '~_<r,","?~!,,~,..' -·""'ë:;::q?·.(.<\æ-'+~:;~; , ' . ", '·(,~;!';Y. _~~"';~'! "~I, ;~·:\~:;;.l1::,:";"'_;). MINUTES or THE JANUARY 17, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Flungy and pused unsnimously to enact Urgency Ordinance No. 1215. 32. Secoad reading of Ordinance No. 1208: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino .wending Section 17.32.070 and Adding Sections 17.32.1001' and 17.08.085 to the City of Cupertino Municipal Code." It waa moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers and pused unanimously to read Ordinance No. 1208 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the second reading thereof. It was ..ved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers and passed unanimously to enact Ordinance No. 1208. 33. Secoød reading of Ordinance No. 1212: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Rezoning Approxillat31y 30 Acres from Rl-6 Zone to Rl-6i Zone; The Rezoning Propoges to Add the "i" Designation Which Will Impose a Building Beigbt: Restriction of One-Story Not to Exceed 15 Ft. Upon All New Construction Within the Zoning Boundary; the Subject Property Consists of the Laurelhurst Subdivision, Tract Number 1939, 2320, 2483 and 2539 Which Are Located on the Following Streets: Beat.....rwood Drive, Colony Hills Lane, Fallenleaf Lane, Tiptoe Lane and lilestlyn Way, Generally Bordered as Follows: Beginning Approxi- mat,dy 350 Ft. West of Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road at the Intersec- tion with Fa11enleaf Lane, 200 Ft. Northeast of the Unimproved HigbKay 85 Right of Way, 600 Ft. East of Stelling Road and 1,000 Ft. South of Bollinger Road (Adjacent to and Southerly of Jolly- man School)." It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers and passed unanimously to read Ordinance No. l2lZ by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the second reading thereof. It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rog~rs and passed unanimously to enact Ordinance No. 1Zl0. 34. Secocd reading of Ordinance No. lZ13: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter Z.32, Planning Commission, of the Cupertino Municipal Code." It was mov~d by Counc. P1ungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers and pasaed unanimously to read Ordinance No. lZ13 by title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the second reading thereof. It was ~ved by Coune. Plungy, seconded by Coune. Rogers and passed unanimously to enact Ordinance No. lZ13. RESOLUTIOSS 35. Non", . . t ~ . ··'?·>~~""·7- --'"~'^:'~7~~T~'~;~;~:~~'~~''''' -':" . MINUTES OF THE .lANDAU 17, 1983 cn'!' comrcIL WmTING NON-AGENDA BUSDlBSS 36. None STAFF REPORTS (c01Itinued) City ManaKer's "port - By conse_.. che CUy Clerk.. direcced Co send a letter to Sally Sc¡,......nn. CJíai.rper80u of tbP Library eo.a1ssion, requesting that she or her represaltat:ive frOla the Co~.sioD attend the next Council meeting to discuss their request for lelJlÜ research. This item will be scheduled early 1u the meeting. At 10:30 p.., the meeting was adjouraed. ~~~~~~) City Clerk ~ CC-598 PQge 11 I Letter to Library Com.