CC 07-19-83
.
. ~
I.
.
I
I
,
.
T
.
--
~< "~":I
~"ji!ofJ__
CC-616
?age 1
CI'I'Y OF CUPERTINO, S'I'A'I'E OF CALIFORNIA
10300 'I'orre Avenue, CapertilJo, CA 95014
~.l.phone: (408) 252-4505
MINO'l'ES or 'l'HB ADJOORIIZO RBGOLAR MEE'1'IIIG or
'I'HE CI'I'Y COOIfCIL IßLD Oil JOLY 19, 1983
IN THE COONCIL CHAMBER
CI'I'Y HALL, COPER'l'IIIO, CALIPORNU
Mayor Gatto called the meeting to order in the ~ouncil
CI._ber at 7:05 p.m.
SALO'I'B TO 'l'HE FLAG
ROLL CALL
Coone. Present: 30hnson, Plangy, Rogers, Spar~s (7:15
p.m.), Mayor Gatto
Staff Present: City Manager Ooill an
Ci ty Clerk Corneli- J
Director of Public Works Viskovich
Director of Planning. Development Sisk
Director of Parks and Recreation
Dowling
Assistant Planning Director Cowan
City 'ttorney Kilian
18. Application 2-GPA-83 of City of Cupertino (Vallco Park
Planning Area): General Plan Land ~se Amendment which
proposes to shift the location of a 720 room hotel from
Pruneridge Avenue to Vallco Parkway; expand the size of
the Vallco Park Fashion Plaza (shopping center) by
approximately 300,000 sq. ft. and to moai!y the Vallco
Park Construction Phasing Memo. The Memo regulates the
location and timing of building construction in Vallco
Park commensurate with specific street improvements.
The proposed modification of the Construction Phasing
Memo would permit approximatœly 225,000 sq. ft. of
Corporate Research and Development (R . 0) offic~ space
to be con3truct~ ahead of schedule contingent up~~ ~
new road construction plan based upon upd~ted traffic
information. Environmental Review: The ~lanninq
Commission recommends the granting of a Negative
Declaration. Recommended for approval.
(a) Resolution No. 6138: "' Resolo~ion of the City
Council of the City of Cupe~tino 'doptinq an
Amendment to the Comprehensive General Plan."
Director of Planning and Developm~nt Sisk informed Council
that it would be appropriate lo take some action on this
application even though ~pplication 1-~PA-8~ had been
---_._....._----_.~._----_._---,..__._--~_._-------_..._--_.,--~---
,
'-
.'
CC-fl1tþ
Page 2
.
pac
h_ng
closed
Negative
Dec. for
2-GPA-83
2-GPA-83
approved
e
~
.
. , 7
'MINUTES or THE JOLY 19, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
.~~... '."
'f¡; ., >\-, 1:>", , ,"~,'_'!
. ~:>, ";t~~ ' "
''''':'':::'.:.¿~.~~.~.::::':,
approved. He felt this would be a backup and r!ltoguard.
The application pertains to the r.location of the propo..d
hotel ait. and additior.al office apace.
(City Clert's Note: Counc. Sparts arrived at 7:15 p.a.)
It was aoved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Plungy
and ~aøsed with Counc. Sparks ebstaining to clos. th.
public hearing.
It waa mov.ad by Counc. JOhnson, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed with Counc. Sparts abstaining to approve the
granting of a Negativo Declaration.
It was moved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Plungy
and passed with Counc. Sparts abstaining to approve
Application 2-GPA-83 and adopt Resolution No. 6138 adopting
an amendment to the comprehensive General Plan.
l~. Applica~ion l-Z-83 of Vallco Part, Ltd.: R.zoning
approximat.ly .2 acres from OP (Professional Office)
and CG (General Commercial) to P (Planned Development
with commercial, office and hotel intent) zoning
district and Bnvironmental Review: The Planning
Commission recommends the graD~ing of a Negati,e
Declaration. The rezoning is requested to per.it
construction of a hotel and approximately 1.6 ~illion
sq. ft. mixed use development consisting of multi-story
office and commercial expansion to the Vallca Fashion
Park Regional Shopping Cent.r. The subject property is
located on th. north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard,
east side of Wolfe Road, south side of Vallco Partway
and at the northeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard
and "'antau Avenue. Recollllllended for approval.
9. (continued)
(a) First re~ding of Ordinance No. 1229: "An
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending
Section I of Ordinance No. 2 by Rezoning
Approxi.ately 42 acres from OP and CG Zone to P
Zoning District; Located on the North Side of
Stevens Creek Bouelvard, JEast Side of Wolfe Road,
South Side of Vallco Parkway and ~t the Northeast
Corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Tantau
Avenue."
3. Application 6-U-73 of Vallco Park, Ltd. (Vallco
Fashion Park ~egio~al Shopping Center): Amendment of
the 1973 use permit to rescind certain conditions of
approval pertaining to street i.provements. ~ruck
barricades and limitations on expansion of the Regiona~
Shopping Center and Environmental Review: The Planning
Commission recomme~ds the granting of a Negative
':'f;;\ ""
;::~!:
K1NU'1'!S 0' 'HI JULY 19, 1983 CIft COUNCIL MtE'rING
Declaration. The subject property consists of the
Vallco Fashion Park Regional Shopping Center located on
the east and _st side of Nolfe Road soath of Highway
280 and north of Stevens Cr_k Boulevard. The Regional
Shopping Cent.r is located in a P (Planned DeveloPlNnt
wi th regional shoppi"9 c81lter/c~ercial use intent)
zoning district. Rec~nded for approval.
Director of Planning and Development Sisk informed Council
that the application woald be _nded to use the wording
reqarding Vallco height as per I-GPA-80.
Discussion followed regarding Condition No. 19 of the
original application 6-0-73.
It was moved by C~unc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Sparks
and passed unanimously to close the public hearing.
Council requested that Exhibit A be modified to show the
quantities of different kinds of land uses L'\owed.
Burrel Leonard, 10050 N. Nolfe Road, Cupertino, requetted
that staff prepare a digest of what is in effect at Vallco
after final action is talten. This would help to elimir.ate
different recollection.
It was moved hy Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed unanimously to grant a Negative Declaration for
Application I-Z-83.
It was moved by Counc. Sp3rks, seconded by Counc. Plungy
and passed unanimously to approve Application l-Z-83 per
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2413 with the changes in
the height limitation.
It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed unaaimously to read Ordinance No. 1229 by
title only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the
first reading thereof.
It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed unanimously to grant a Negative Declaratinn for
Application 6-u-73.
It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconde~ by Counc. Rogers
and passed unanimously to a?prove Application 6-U-73 per
Planning Commission R&~olution No. 2400 and to ñirect staff
to prepare the digest as requested by Mr. ~eonard.
,
Mayor Gatto announced that I~em 26 h~d been (~moved from
the calendar. It will be readvertised for scheduling,
probably in October.
CC-616
Pa.e 3
Public hearing
closed
Negative Dec.
for l-Z-83
I-Z-83
approved
First reading I
of Ord. 1229
Negative Dec.
for 6-U-73
6-U-73
approved
Item removed
i
.' .
cc-U(¡
Page 4
.
e
e
-
.
I
-"-~~~~-~,,~- ~'F.~~;:'Jl!"//'
,'- . '..."/........:,.-.
", ,.
.,..~~''';:;; -
MII0'!!S 0' or,,! JULY l§, 191n CI'n COUNCIL MUIfIIC rt·~~H~
20. Application 2-Z-83 of Cupertino City Center
(Prometheus Development): Rezoning approximately 26
acres from P (Planned development with residential,
c~rcial and office us. intent) zoning district to p.
(Planned Development with commercial, office,
industrial and hotel intent) zoning district and
Envilo~ental Review: No additional Invironmental
Impact Report need be prepared regarding this
application because the
Environmental Impact Report for ~pplication l-GPA-80
fully addresses the impact associ~ted with the proposed
project. The zor.e change is requ\!!sted to allow
constructIon of approximately 1.2 million sq. ft.
industrial buildings and a hotel. The subject
property is located on the southeast corner of Stevens
Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard. Recommended for
approval.
(a) Pirst reading of Ordinance No. 1230: wAn
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino Amending
Section \ of Ordinance No. 2 by rezoning
approximately 26 acres from P Zone to P lone (with
hotel intent) located on the southeast corner of
Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard.w
Director of Planning and Development sisk reviewed the
application with the Council and corrected Condition No. 16
of the Planning Commission Resolution.
Mark Kroll, 10080 N. Wolfe Road, representing Prometheus
Development and Cali Properties, presented a brief
background regarding the project to Council. He stated
this would be a phased project over a 5-10 year period and
felt a development agreement would~e appropriate.
Jim Fair, HOK architects of San Francisco, show~ slides to
Council of the proposed development. It would consist of
approximately 800,000 sq. ft. with five office buildings
and a hotel facing Stevens Creek Boulevard. '1"vo parking
structures would be built which would incorporate the
housing. An amphitheater is tentatively pl~nned, with open
space diagonally across the site.
~r. Kroll addressed Council regarding access to the
development.
Jeff Daimon of Barton-Aschman, 99 Almaden Boulevard, San
Jose, reviewed the neighborhood protection strategy with
Council.
MINUTES OF THE JULY 19, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Council expressed objections to the proposed closure. of
Rodrigues and Pacifica Avenues.
Discussion followed regarding use permits and development
agre_nts.
Hr. Kroll addressed Council regarding Conditions No. 17 and
20. He stated that there will be co.aercial in the hotel
and perhaps in some of the office buildings as well as in
the parking structures. He stated that the dedication of
development rights complicates the financing process. He
stated that Council has control regarding either the use
permit process or development agreement. In regard to
street closures, he stated they were a remote possibility
and did not feel they would occur.
Council requested that Con~ition No. 20 be removed.
Fred St. Claire, Cupertino, stated that he found the
changes made in the General Plan disturbing. He felt that
the nWDber of shelter units had boaen cut in half. He felt
that the proposed development was a beautiful architectural
concept, in fact grandiose, but he h5d a real concern
regarding traffic. He suggested the City consider the
system used in Paris. He stated mild opposition to a hotel
so close to residential.
Al Chappell, South Blaney Avenue, stated the Lake Biltmore
Association had not been notified of the plans, and he
expressed concerns regarding fire danger and elimination of
the access presently used by the Central Fire Protection
District. He stated that three years ago the Lake Biltmore
complex had had a fire. He stated that the residents could
provide input. He requested a single notification to the
apartment complex association and they would notify all the
tenants.
Mr. Chappell was told that the proposed development does
not affect the road.
Mr. Chappell stated that he feels the impact of the density
of the proposed project will be felt by the developer of
the area next to the fire lane.
Dierctor of Public ~orks Viskovich informed Council that
the new owner of the Lake Biltmore Apartments has applied
to close the fire lan~. He stated that the approved
conditions would alloll such a closure. The City staff
requesred that the pr,)perty owners contact Central Fire
Protection District. The access road is on the Biltmore
property.
It ~as moved by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Plungy
and passed unanimously to close the public hearing.
CC-6l6
Page S
Public hearing
closed
CC7616, .
Page 6 .
Policy
statement
reaffic
e
2-Z-83
approved
e
....,~'.,':¥'!,...:,"J"-~; '"':.~~-~ '~'~"T~~:
. ~ ~If.
".,'.-:-:Y" :. "",,,.:', .:. .,,.....
, . MINUTES 0' !ME JUL1 it 198~ Cl'f! CQUICIL "'1!'ttl\1"'f;:(·;~\ê,~:;~,::;¡Y'r'
By consensus, Council issued a policy stat...nt tb.t
anything i.pacting e.isting residential areas fr~ their
noraa1 traffic pattern is unacceptable and .itigation
should be achieved through internal design and not street
closures.
oncerns expressed by Council were the amount of parking
seen fro. the street, the traffic impact, the proposed
eight story height and the triangular shaped land east of
Torre Avenue.
It vas IIOVed by Counc. Sparks, seconded by Counc. Rogers.
and passed vith Counc. Plungy dissenting to approve
Application 2-Z-83 per Planning Commission Resolution No.
2410 a..ended as fo11ovs:
ondition No. 16 shall state 158 dwelling units and the
ord ".inimWII" shall be deleted. The condition shall read,
"The number of dwelling units ...y exce.~ 158 provided that
the overall nWllber of residential units for the 50-acre
Tovn Center property does not Gxceed 600."
ondition No. 16 shall state that under this conceptual
plan there is no development potential of the triangular
iece of land east of Torre Avenue. All presently allowed
evelopaent potential is being used.
ondition No. 20 shall be eliminated. The development
agreement shall be permissive.
The ...p shall be a..ended to sbow open space areas and to
include the area east of Torre Avenue as open space. Tbe
ap shall also show quantities of different kinds of land
uses allowed.
ondition No. 19 shall include a statement that particular
attention is to be given to the parking structures so that
they are adequately screened from major arterials.
ouncil determined that at such time as it is necessary to
extend Torre most traffic concerns shall be answered.
ouncil also requested a survey from the architect
regarding where tiered parking as proposed prosently
exists.
~lrst read- It waS moved by Counc. plungy. seconded by Counc. Rogers
~~ °i230 and passed unanlmously to read Ordlnance No. 1230 by title
~ only and the City Clerk's reading to constitute the first
~ reading thereof.
.
(Clerk informed Council that the word "residential" shall
be inserted in the resolution.)
þ
t
.
þ
.
.
<"~"', 'ic7"1!<r':
.'
MINUTES or THI JULY 19, 1983 CITY COUNCIL MII'I'IRG
It was 80ved by Counc. Sparts, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed unanimously to find that no additional
environ.ental impact report need be prepared regarding
Application2-Z-83 because the Enviromaental Impact aeport
for the General Plan fully addresses the impacts associated
with the proposed project.
21. Review of Application 3-U-77, AAA Ambulance Company.
It was moved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. aogers
and passed unanimously to close the public hearing.
It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Johnson
and passed unanimously to eliminate Condition No. 20 of th.
use permit.
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
22. Application 15-0-83 of Design Analysis: Ose Permit to
construct two office buildings totaling approximately
39,000 sq. ft. and Environmental Review: The Planning
Com.ission recom.ends the granting of a Negative
Declaration. The subject property is located in the
southeast quadrant of De Anza Boulevard and Rodrigues
Avenue. Re,~~ended for approval. (Continued from the
meeting of July 5. 1983).
Director of Planning and Development Sist reviewed the
redesign of the site plan, particularly the parking.
It was moved by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Sparts
and passed unanimously to grant a Negative Declaration for
Application 15-0-93.
It was moved by Counc. Johnson. seconded by Counc. Sparks
and passed unanimously to approve Application 15-U-83 per a
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2406 with Condition No.
22 amended to read, "The applicant is required to provide
one parting space for every 285 sq. ft. of gross floor area
for corporate administrative office and general office
space. Medical/dental office space shall provide one
parking space for every 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area.
Commercial uses shall provide parking at the ratios
identified in the City's parking ordinance."
Condition No. IS shall be amended to reflect Exhibit A 1st
Revision.
24. Applications 22-U-83 and Il-TM-83 of Canada Development
Company: Use Permit to construct nine at~~ched
residential townhouses; tentative subdivision map to
subdivide approximately one acre into nine residential
townhouse lots and one lot to be held in common
cc-616
'as. 7
110 ED re-
quired
Public bearing
clo..d
Condition 20
.11a1nated
froa 3-U-77
Negative Dec.
for l5-U-83
15-U-83
approved
CC-616
Pa&e8 :-
.
2a83
a"'d
ll-TM-83
approved
e
-
.
""0.. .
;" , ~
~ "" ... -' >~
"."':
, ~'.
;,..'
. .
.
"- .'
'<t?;~:t, ,~'
MUIU!lS OP 'HI JOLY 1' 1, 1981 Clf! COtJIClL MlmMC 'III1iIit~;~i)'~'q. '.
ovnership and Envirorœental Revi_: '!'he project v..
previously assessed, hence, no action is required. ~
subject property is located in the northeast quadrant
of Blaney Avenue and Beekmen Place in a P (Planned
Development vith 5-10 dvelling units per gross acre
intent) zoning district. Recommended for appro.al.
It vas moved by Counc. Sparts, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed unanimously to appro"e Application 22-0-83 per
Planning C~ission Resolution No. 2417.
It vas Counc. Sparts, seconðed by Counc. Rogers and passed
unanimously to approve Application II-TM-83 per Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2418.
25. Application l-u-68 (Revised) ~f Dale Applegate and
Robert Morgan: Revision of a use permit to allow
retail use in an existing offi~e building and
Environmental Review: The project is categorically
exempt, hence, no action is required. The sUbject
property is located on the south side of Stevens Creet
Boulevard approximately 270 ft. east of Stelling Road
in a P (Planned Development) zoning district.
Recommended lor approval.
Director of Planning and Development Sist stated that th~
issue was the dedication of Bianchi Nay as required by
Condition No. 17.
Robert Morgan, one of the property owners, requested that
the Council exclude Condition No. 17. He stated that the
previous consent of one of the owners which was given at
the Planning Commission meeting was withdrawn. The other
thr~e owners do not agree to the dedication. He felt that
the previous agreement had been made under intimidation.
The property is currently in escrow, and the new owner does
not agree to that condition. In regard to Council's
condition requiring Community Housing Developers to acqulre
access, he stated that this was reasonable as it serves
their project. He stated that the principle of law
regarding roadway improvements requires that such
improvements be reason3bly connected tc the project. He
felt that the improvement of Bianchi Nay is connected to
the Community Housing Developers project. He stated that
he had beer. told the dedication issue was a dead issue.
~r. Morgan stated he had been denied advance access to the
staff report and had just received it the day of the
meeting. He called Jim sist and told him that the City
Council had already turned down dedication. Community
Hou~ing Developers told the Planning Commission that they
have limited resources. Theref~re, he and the other
property owners are being required to donate the land. Mr.
Morgan stated that Community Housing Developers had
misstated the facts when they informed the Commission that
all landowners had been contacted and agreed to the
<'
,MINUTES or THE JULY 19, 1983 CITY COUNCIL H!lfIRG
.
dedication other than their portion. Hr. Horgan stated ,.
had contacted the owners who said they had not been
contacted by Community Housing Developers. Hr. Horgan
stated he had not opposed CHD before. He stated that now
one owner wants to overburden the roadway with
approximately 100 trip ends per day. He requested that th.
permlt be granted without Condition No. 17.
City Attorney Kilian stated he was present at the Planning
Commission hearings and Community Housing Developers vere
present at that tim.. Th. Planning Commission had approved
a compromise which requir.d dedication, not improvement.,
of Bianchi Way. At that meeting he asked if the applicant
agreed and was told .y.... At that point discussion
ceased. Had there not b.en agreement, there probably would
have been more discussion.
City Attorney Kilian stated that he believed Community
Housing Developers should have the opportunity to respond
to the withdrawal of approval. The application should
either be sent back to the Planning Commission or contj~~ed
to allow the others to come and speak. Hr. Kilian further
stated that he saw no undue influence or harassment
occurring at the Planning Commission meeting.
Dale Applegate, applicant, informed Council that he was
present at the Planning Commission meeting. In regard to
"intimidation," the reference was that Hr. Applegate sp~ke,
then Community Housing Developers' representative spoke and
said that all owners except he had been contacted and
agreed t~ the dedication. At that point CHD demanded that
the applicants agree. Hr. Applegate felt it looked like
the owners of this particular parcel were the only
holdouts. It was later that they found out the others had
not been contacted. Hr. Applegate stated that he would
call that intimidation.
Mr. Morgan agreed to a t~o week continuance.
It was moved by Counc. Sparks, seconde¿ by Counc. Johnson
and passed unanimously to continue consideration of
Application I-U-68 (Revised) to the ~eeling of August 1,
1983. Neighbors, Community Housing Developers, and
interested parties shall be sent notice.
~
26. Application 10-TM-76 (Revised) of Walter and Roseann
Frederick (BAS Homes): Tentative map revision to amend
Condition 17 of Appliction 10-TM-76 to permit a
second-story addition. Condition 17 currently limits
residences adjacent to Lazaneo Drive to on~ story in
height. ~nvironmental review: The project is
categorically exempt, hence, no action is required.
The subject property is located on the southeast corner
of Lazaneo Drive and Miner Place in a P (Planned
I
.~~.~f~.'"'"'
,<œ.616
"'" 9
-~,')
I-U-68 (Rev.)
continued
"
CC-616
Page 10
.
e
Planning
Co_ission
ilrviews
Fee waived
for Arts and
Wine festival
Fawaived
f rt
a on
.
,. .
.
HINU'I'BS OF 'l'ft!: JULY 1~, 1983 CITY COONCIL KBB'ING~'
oeve1opeent vith residential sing1e-fa.i1y intent) aonlft9
district. Reco..ended for denial.
This it.. vas r..oved from the calendar.
ARCHI'ECTURAL AND SI'I APPROVAL COMMI"!I APPLICA,rORS
27. lIone
OMPIR!SHID BUSIMESS
28. Consideration of request from Cable 'e1evision Advisory
Co..ittee regarding remote origination van provided for
in cable franchise agreement.
This it.. was continued to later in the agenda as the
representative fro. the Cable Television Advisory committee
vas not yet present.
29. Selection of date to interviev Planning Commission
applicants.
It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Johnson
and pas.ed unanimously to conduct inter~iews on Tuesday,
August 2, 1983 at 6:00 p.m. Council requested that
applicants unable to arrive by 6:00 p.m. notify the City
Clerk, but should be there by 6:30 p.m.
N~ BUSINESS
30. Request from Cupertino Chamber of Commerce for waiver
of business license fees and parking on Rodrigues
Avenue during their 8th Annual ~rts and Crafts and Wine
Tasting Festival.
It was moved by Coone. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Johnson
and passed unanimously to vaive business license fees fOE
the Chamber of Co.merce Annual Arts and Crafts and Wine
Tasting Festival to be held August 6 and 7, 1983, and to
allow parking along Rodrigues Avenue.
31. Request from De Anza Lions of Cupertino for waiver of
business license fees and facility use fees for their
art auction al the Senior Community Center.
It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Plungy
and passed unanimously to waive buainess license fees.
It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Sparks
and passed unanimously to waive use fees at the Senior
Community Center for the fund raiser auction to be held on
September 24, 1983..
.
.
þ
þ
þ
.,. .,,",'~ ',- .
~i"~;}:~~7::~,",:-:"'-'
"
"I'
. .
-
MINUTES or THB ~ULY 19, 1983 CITY COUNCIL HE~I.c
32. Request fr~ Any Mountain Ltd. for a variðnc. fro.
Policy Stat...nt of Outdoor Sales, Section 2D for their
annual "Labor Day Ski Sale.N
It was IIOVed by Counc. Johnson, seconded by Counc. Rogers
and pessed anenlllOusly to approve a vadance to Policy
Stat...nt of OUtdoor Sales, Section 2D, for Ski Any
Mountain L.bor Day ski sale so they lI.y open Sept..ber 3 at
6:00 a.m.
33. Report on Bid Opening for Stevens Creek Bicycle
Detection Project, 82-25, and award of contract.
It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Sparks
and passed unani.ously to award the project to Howard
Electric for the low bid of $34,666.
34. Claim for daaages filed by Robert ~atson.
It was moved by Counc. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Sparks
and passed unanillOusly to reject the claim filed by Robert
Watson and to direct the City Clerk to so notify the
claimant.
35. Summons and complaint fiied in Superior Court: Evelyn
Seaberg, plaintiff.
Council received the summons an~ complaint for filing.
36. Report - Stora Drain problem at Foothill and Copertino
Road.
It was moved by Coone. Rogers, seconded by Counc. Sparks
and passed unanimoos1y to direct staff to retain a
consulting engine.r to design storm improvements as
outlined per report of Director of Public Works dated Joly
18, 1983 in order to complete improvements prior to next
year's storm and to appropriate $75,000 from the Master
Storm Drain Fund for engineering and construction.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
37. None
ORDINANCES
38. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1127: "An Ordinance of
the City of Cupertino Amending Section 1 of Ordinance
No. 1 by Rezoning Approximately 10 Gross access from OP
Zone to P Zone; Located in the southeast quadrant of De
Anza Boulevard and Rodrigues Avenue."
CC-616
ras. 11
V.rriaøc:e
,M
Contract to
Howard Elec-
tric
Watson claim
~ejected
Storm improve-
ments
'j"",
-,...~ -'''''7"/:' ";'~~;~'~'~!'i?:"",--:"",~~~~:!",~.,~{. '_r-,
:; _ - .i;",¡>!:;..'i;:·~'Ì"\"./~:, "', <~~1,?~~
RlltJ'fES 0' 'fHE JOLt'., 1913 e'tn ðJårclL gnt.".
CCl616 -:' ....
Page iz .
Ofd; 1127
.d, read-
Ord. 1127
-wed
Second raad-
ing of Ord.
1128
Ord. 1128
enacted
·
·
·
It vas IIOved by Counc. Pluft9Y, seccmded by Coonc. *~.
and passed un5ni80asly to read OEdiaaoce Ro. 1111 bY ttel.,
only and the Ci ty Clerk'. readinc to coast! tate tbe .ecOftd
reading thereof.
It va. moved by Counc. Plaft9Y, .eccmded by Coanc. Roger.
and passed unanimou'ly to enact ot4iaaoce Ro. 1127.
39. Second Reading of Ordinance RO. 1128. NAn Ordinaace of
tbe City of Cupertino Allending Uction 11.08.290 and
11.08.300 and Adding Section 11.08.]10, Cupertino
Municipal Code Relating to Bicycle Lane., Route.; and
Violations.N
It was moved by Counc. Plungy, seconded by Counc. Rogers
nd passed unanimously to read Ordinance No. 1128 by title
nly and the City Clerk's reading to constitute tbe second
reading thereof.
It was moved by Coune. Plungy, seconded by Coune. Roger.
nd passed unanimously to enact Ordinance No. 1128.
ESOLU'l'IONS
o. None
ON-AGENDA BUSINESS
41. Recognition by Mayor of special requests.
(a) General Audience - None
(b) City Council
City Attorney Kilian stated he would have a draft
of a development agre..ent enabling ordinance
prepared for Council by Augu.t I. He suggested
that a committee of review be formed.
Solid Waste
North Santa Clara County Municipal Solid Waste
Management Program - By consenaus, Council
~equested that the City Manager prepare a written
document stating that Council has determined that
if the dump site is to be located in Cupertino the
road shall be elsewhere and shall mitigate traffic
problems. Council also authorized staff to look
at costs, expected revenues, etc., should
Cupertino have its own dump site.
I .' ·
MINOTBI or THB JOLY 19, !~33 CITY COOMCIL MI17tIC
The City Hanagar announced that he would lite a closed
session at the end of the meeting.
~~" ~;~ "'~~'~"-"õ"~,<?""_;t~~~~i,V:r'~~'r7-"0 ~~~,*,' -~~.f~~~~·F~~;:-'~." tr?,'"~·':"-. »;
·
·
ONFIRISHID BOSINISS (continued)
¿B. (continued)
Don Mackenzie, Chairperson, Cable 'lY Advisory Com.itt..,
stated that he had ..t with the General Manager frOll oaU4Ið
Cable who ha. .tated that an interim van will be provid-'.
Mr. Macleensie infomed Coancil that the request trOll th.
Cabl. 'IV Mvhory C~ittee is withdrawn, continqent apo"
the interim van being a.ailable until the new van is
provided.
At 10:35 p.m., the meeting adjourned to the Conference RoOll Cloaed session
for a Closed Session regarding a personnel matter.
At 10:37 p.m., the meeting was reconvened in Council
Chamber with all Council_bers present. City Manager
Quinlan and City Clerle Cornelius were also present.
·
It was moved by Coane. Sparle., seconded by Counc. Rogers
and passed unanimously to increase compensation for the
City Attorney for non-retainer duties by $~.OO per hour.
The City Attorney's compensation will be reviewed next
y..ar.
Attorney's
compensation
ADJOURNMBNT
At 10:40 p.m., the meetinq was adjourned.
~. ~~-~)
Cl t Cle~
·
þ