DRC Summary 030305
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
To:
Mayor and City Council Members
Planning Commissioners
From:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development
Date:
March 7, 2005
Subj:
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE
March 3, 2005.
Chapter 19.136 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for
A eal of decisions made b the Desi Review Committee
1. Application
R-2005-05; Andy DeBaets, 10339 Byrne Avenue
Description
Exception for a 22' 9" front yard setback for a new residence where 25 feet is
required by the Stevens Creek subdivision map (Tract No. 139)
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective March 3, 2005. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on March
17,2005.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of March 3, 2005
Resolution No. 202
Approved Plans
2. Application
EXC-2005-04; Mike Strouse (Keypoint Credit Union), 10495 S. De Anza
Boulevard
Description
Sign Exception to allow 36-inch sign letter height when 18 inches is allowed.
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective March 3,2005. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on March
17,2005.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of March 3, 2005
Resolution No. 203
Approved Plans
3. Application
EXC-2005-03; Paul Bosman (Peers Coffee and Tea), 20807 Stevens Creek
Boulevard
Description
Sign Exception to allow two blade signs on an approved commercial building
and to exceed the allowed wall sign height.
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective March 3, 2005. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on March
17,2005.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of March 3, 2005
Resolution No. 204
Approved Plans
G:planning/Drc/030305 summaryletter.doc
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Gary Chao, Assistant Planner
Application: R-2005-05
10399 Byrne Avenue
Date: March 3, 2005
Proiect Description: Exception for a 22' -9" front yard setback for a new residence where
25 feet is required by the Stevens Creek subdivision map (Tract No. 139)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of R-2005-05, based on the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The project area was subdivided in 1940 under the County's jurisdiction. The
subdivision map and the property deed call for a 25-foot front yard setback. In cases
where the subdivision map and the deed clearly call for larger setbacks, the City
respects the larger setback.
DISCUSSION:
There are 10 homes in Tract No. 139 and seven were rebuilt between the years of 1997-
2002 with front yard setbacks less than 25 feet. Thus the neighborhood pattern is no
longer 25 and staff does not support requiring 25 feet for this project.
The exception process allows neighbors to be aware of the City's intention to allow
lesser setback.
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Property Photo
Plan Set
Prepared by: Gary Chao, Assistant Planner,
Approved by: Peter Gilli, Senior Planner ~
1- I
R-2005-05
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FOR AN EXCEPTION FOR A 22' -9" FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A
NEW RESIDENCE WHERE 25 FEET IS REQUIRED BY THE STEVENS
CREEK SUBDIVISION MAP (TRACT NO. 139)
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
R-2005-05
Andy DeBaets
10339 Byrne Avenue
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. The literal enforcement of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with
the spirit and intent of this chapter.
2. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in
the area, nor be detrimental to the public safety, health and welfare.
3. The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the
prescribed design regulation and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose
4. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed
from abutting properties.
5. The project will be compatible with the surround buildings and will not result in
any visual impacts when viewed from the abutting properties.
1-ó0
Resolution No.
Page 2
R-2005-05
March 3, 2005
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. R-2005-5, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
R-2005-5 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of March
3, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "New Single Family Residence for Mr. &
Mrs. Andy DEBAETS, 10339 Byrne Avenue, Cupertino, CA. 95004," dated June 9,
2004, except as amended by this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
APPROVED:
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
I-~
~
u
cd
~
(l)
r./'J
~
~
o
~
~
rJ:J
r-
~
o
.,.D
,..0
bJ)
.~
(l)
z
~
o
o
Q
~
><
(l)
z
.-...
~
t:Q
0\
('r¡
('r¡
o
......-<
"-"
0)
00
;::::s
o
:::r::
~
o
t
I-<
o
:ê
~
.....
0)
z
.......
$:1
o
~ 00
00 ro
0)" :;;-
~8~
...!::,DO
u...!::........ .
~ .~ ~ ¢::
SO)Otn
$:1 $:1 N
0) 0) 0) $:1
8;S...!:: ro
»O)~;S
t:Q :> $:1 ( )
O\.~ 0) ~
('r¡Q:.)7dd
8,D.......¡::¡
........0)00»
.......>'E+::
ro~O)...!::
0) a) S .~
00000)........
;::$ ;::$ I-< 00
o 0 ;::$ ~
...!::...!:: ~ g
~....oo 0) ...0
0) ~ S d)
$:1 ...0 $:1 00
O)...!::ooo
...!:: ~ .....
....... ..... "'0 0)
....... ( ) 0) 00
ro $:1 00 ....
...!::I-<ro......
.......0...0]
[j..9~ .......
00 "-' \0 $:1
o ......." 0)
o..><N ~
o 0) N ......
I-< $:1 ~ u
p.. 0) U I-<
O);Sro;::$
g~,DO
ro 0....... .
..... ~ 0) "'0
~ u : 0)
:> ro ..... ~
0)...0;::::: :;;-
...!:: ....... ro 15
f-;~~oo
\-4
R-2005-05
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 202
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FOR AN EXCEPTION FOR A 22' -9" FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR A
NEW RESIDENCE WHERE 25 FEET IS REQUIRED BY THE STEVENS
CREEK SUBDIVISION MAP (TRACT NO. 139)
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
R-2005-05
Andy DeBaets
10339 Byrne Avenue
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. The literal enforcement of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with
the spirit and intent of this chapter.
2. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in
the area, nor be detrimental to the public safety, health and welfare.
3. The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the
prescribed design regulation and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose
4. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed
from abutting properties.
5. The project will be compatible with the surround buildings and will not result in
any visual impacts when viewed from the abutting properties.
Resolution No. 202
Page 2
R-200S-05
March 3, 2005
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. R-2005-05, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
R-2005-05 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
March 3,2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "New Single Family Residence for Mr. &
Mrs. Andy DEBAETS, 10339 Byrne Avenue, Cupertino, CA. 95004," dated June 9,
2004, except as amended by this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020( d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Saadati and Acting Chairperson
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller
APPROVED:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
/s/ CiddyWordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
/s/ Lisa Giefer
Lisa Giefer, Acting Chairperson
Design Review Committee
'f
~
.
""
0-
~ª
.6-.çt
'-.
W
~ z'
z <
W
> ,....¡
< p...
"
W ËI~
z
~
r u>~
~
~
~
~
~
_ -F-~1::'1 .«:.
- I··,· ,. .
¡¡ - ---'- -- "
~~~ - - -
....,....,~.
Jhfl >I:waJ.]S
" ,,6-,ZZ
~-.rL
---<o~--t---
......':-'",
.o-,9\,
.. II ~
I :...... ~~ '"
.... ",i< ~
. .. ~
..---. , "
1:.' ,. ä
V} ,"I .' z<..>
; ~ 'I
~~
.,.\~II<
,';." _", __' I I _
'. -, Ò' ,^
, .. . " :2' .
.. r, I'
...;¡ . b··
...~ ~ J
"~' ~~. .,-.
',' ,0 ,'.
. ~"
J.,
Î
Î
J.,
Î
.o-.ll
------
o
J.,
J.,
(-I~
Î
Î
J.,
(- I ~
Î
.
,";'
, _.:,,\'ä.-
, . .") r,,::.'.f-
'r . "' .. PC. ...~.
.-"".ci'1:!(-}
.. ~ 'J.. ,:i',': ~- '" ~ ~ \ ";Jð
>IOI8J3S
.6-.(';z
,,9-.6
. =1 g ~ ,I~ :
! i~ n ~ ~ ~ ~i ~
~ ~¡.~ ~ ~ ~.~ .
~ ~I' gš ! I · ~ is g ~ I
~ 9 ~, ! ~ <i ~ > i
. . .~ ~ ;. . t~ . "'
. ~ iii;¡ ~ ~ ... ~"
~'l ~@ n ¡; ! i . < ~ij ~ ~ ~
:>~¡. H.~. "I · · I ~ I ~~. ~ . i<
~I U i'S ~ ." I":c- ~ ~ ~¡¡ '" j ~
;.11 · .~~ g " " ~ ~. ~ ~ 8
~~~ :n !~~ ;d ~ i d ; ¡~ ~ i ~
Ilil ;~ i i¡; ¡~ i : i · Î! ~ ii ~!! ~
!~II :f ~ !i! ~: ~; ! ~ ! I{ I !:~ ~ ; ~ ;!
~§~~ ~~! lii~ j! ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ i~ j ~§!i ~ ~ ~ ¡:
I~~m I~ ¡ .~~" ~ ~~ ..1 i ~ ii ~ -.! ~ j ~ ~!
1m i ~~ ~ !I~ ~I ~ ~s I ~ ~ ~ ~~ : !~~ ~ ! ! r!
"
~~
!I~
/i(¡ IJ!~'1: II!¡;
d s~I~G~ \'
~.. I~ ~ -< ! ~ . k
." ~ \ \
. \
InJfð
~~ill!! ~
I'~~H~I ! h
ÞnH~lhÎi
~n~1 q~~P~~~¡p
B~~ ~~U.~~~gU~
!8~+ ~.~®~l&~ml]]
tiliPl§¡J1
~. I I
Udh~ i
¡
~ I I' ,i ~~ II i ~"'
¡ " '; , h
.
--'
----1--
.0-,6
.o-,r¡
1:3 f:J
¡g ¡g
~ ~
. .
J.,
1
I
><
'1:\
",\j
~<Í
1"\
-'
~ '2
...... =
,/ ""
~ ~
¡,¡;. eN
Uz
,,' «
~I ~
., .
.~ ~
~" .
c_ ~
.~ *
Ii !
I~ ;
~i ¡
g- ~
.~ :¡
~I ~
~I ~
:¡. iiI
~~ ~
$1 !i
~i ~
~jd
'"
6
~
'"
u~ ~ I; I ;!;I~j
Is~a ~ i ¡I aa¡~"~
~'~; :1 ~~ ~g ~~lig6
~~ - iê ~~. ~i î _~i
~~ ~ Õ'"'" . !i
~.~! :; ~ ~~ §~. !~I!I!
i¡¡¡~ ~ ~ I~i ~~ ~~ ~I~~.~
I~~~ ! ! !:~ ;¡ gl iiil;~~1
~i~i ~ ~ If; ~i ~~ -!Ib;
~~!. I· :¡ ~~. ~~~. ~."~~.
. -i ~ ~~~. ~ i§~~~
d¡; ~~ ! I!! ¡; h !1~:lli
!h ~i ~ i·~ =1 ~I. i~~ui:
ul~ ;~ I ~h j. ~~~ ~~h;li
i'a ~ · ð"~ . 1/ g .~¡¡i~..
hb ~~ · I·~ "I~! m~-:.i~
Un II I ~h i; 1:1 dIm;
.. ....,.,;,..: 00 '"
-' N ...; ... ui
h ~
u ~ ~ ~
,~h ~
~~~~~
~i U I
" - .
..
-' N"';
>l:J'ÐJ3S
.6-,rz
"
.,
, ~I
. ; ;,1 :=ø :!~II
~ ¡ :i~ "i! nIl:
~ ¡ ~I~ ~!. ~"~
". Ii ¡ ~iiI~ ~.~h
\' -~ Id ~I~~gl
;! .\1 I '" i '
~ e . :;1 ·¡í !i'¡
, I .. 0 11 . Iii Iii b¡li;
, a: c: ffi ~i ~c ~i~*"
Q ,21 .. ~~~ ~i~~~1
en rD ~~. i~' ! ."~~
,~_. .......-..uJ ~; ~b ~~ ~g;i.
cB E---. ~., ill ;;i ~!;'=I
~ !; ..~I!
Q) ~ iU > g~~I=i
g <c · iiI~~ I~i 1¡I~i
Q) ~ "di ~I ~ ~I;
""0 "
.- ~
~Q
~ ~ z
~o ED
·s Z I I i ~s
æ <c "~'~--?r-
~ . ~?,4.i~' I
00"'1 ~"
_ ~'.'il
~-»,c:_ .~;~
01)'"'''''' 'f
d =so,"~" ! I"
"-
r./J !
0(3"
~ ~C.
~ ql Jib
. w....·
Q) ~ ~ d':~l' ;¡ ;¡
Z =s Vc;";(' ~
,""1' ~
::;:¡ ..."..". ~
~ I 'LiT' W~
w .c:cr.,)J l'r
E-< "
-
en ¡ i:,>_, , I'
b
,
_ _ _ ~J~
r;¡
~
!;:¡
§j
'"
~
1~
tf ,~ !i
..~ ~..
~~. ~ w ê~~8i
% ~ mu s U s§"S~
a: ~ :? ....Ia.õ(
" N .
!\~I!! ~" 8~~i1~
_... ::1...............
~. ÇJ ~~;i
~i § n~ê ~r
~.s. ~ ~ðð~ ,,·~I
~~ ~ ~~.~ ~iU
~~ ; 1;1; ~h~~ ¡
~ i i ~
I ~ ~ ~
o 9 0
If ð1 g
z
Q
"
Wu
5¡3
~
r'T1:"
I'
~
~;;¡I~ ti~ ¿;¡¿;¡~~;;¡
w_
'J
-<
E-<
-<
¡::¡
E-<
U
~
o
g;
:,.
vWÇ6 'VJ' ou!µ;¡dnJ ;¡nU;¡AV ;¡UJÁa 6££01 , ~~i
~ ~JUê~
" ..<ìI<~
SlHYHHG AGNY 'sJW 'W JW ø...i!<'>õ6'
_ 2 <r- ê~~
JOJ ;¡:JU;¡P!S;¡~ Á1!ured ( 1í!U!S M;¡N 8}~ ~~ ~~~
~
I
I
.
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Gary Chao, Assistant Planner
Application: EXC-2005-04
10495 S. De Anza Blvd.
Date: March 3, 2005
Proiect Description: Sign exception to allow 36-inch sign letters when 18-inches is
allowed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of EXC-2005-04, based on the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant (Midway Signs) is proposing new signs for Key Point Credit Union
located at an existing commercial building at the corner of De Anza Boulevard and
McClellan Road. The property currently has an approved sign program that allows for
wall signs up to 18 inches in height.
The applicant is proposing to locate:
· A wall sign on the building along De Anza Boulevard and a second wall sign on
the building along the interior parking lot.
· Reface of an existing ground sign in front of the building along De Anza
Boulevard.
The Sign Ordinance allows a maximum 18-inch wall sign height for this property. The
project proposes 36-inch tall wall signs. Due to the unusual architectural design of the
building, staff recommends approval of the sign exception because of the ability to
make the exception findings. The sign exception will modify the existing sign program
and will also apply to other tenants of the commercial building.
DISCUSSION:
Findings for Exception
Per Section 17.44.040 of the Municipal Code, the Design Review Committee may grant
an exception based upon the following findings:
A. Literal Enforcement of the Sign Regulations will result in restrictions inconsistent with the
spirit and intent of this tit/e.
The intent of the Sign Ordinance is to "provide architectural and aesthetic harmony of
signs as they relate to building design" and to "provide [sign regulations] that will
allow for good visibility for the public and the needs of the business ..." The existing
c2-¡
March 3, 2005
EXC-2005-04
building has an unusually large sign band along De Anza (6 feet tall) and the interior
parking lot (12 feet tall). Eighteen-inch tall wall signs along these two elevations would
appear awkward and not harmonious with the building design. The proposed 36-inch
sign height is better proportioned with the sign band around the building (Please see
photo renderings below).
18-inch wall sign (De Anza Blvd. Elevation)
36-inch wall sign (De Anza Blvd. Elevation)
2
¿;J-õL-
March 3, 2005
EXC-2005-04
36-inch wall sign (interior parking lot elevation)
B. The granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare.
The signs do not create any health or safety problems.
C. Least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum vanance that will
accomplish the purpose.
The maximum length and square footage of the wall signs are consistent with the
Ordinance. The taller wall signs are better proportioned with the existing sign band of
the building.
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Letter of Justification
Plan Set
Prepared by: Gary Chao, Assistant Planner
Approved by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner é~:d(ì-dt:¿(
G: \ PIaruling\ DRC\ staff rep \ 2005\EXC -2005-04.doc
3
d-3
EXC-2005-04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW 36-INCH SIGN LETTERS WHEN
18-INCHES IS ALLOWED.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-04
Mike Strouse (Midway Signs)
10495 S. De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2005-04, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
EXC-2005-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
March 3,2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
c9-4-
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
EXC-2005-04
March 3, 2005
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Keypoint, 10495 De Anza Blvd," received
January 7, 2005, except as amended by this resolution.
2. SIGN PROGRAM
The sign program shall be revised to reflect the allowance for 36-inch tall wall signs.
Revised sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department
prior to issuance of any building permits.
3. SIGN AREA
The wall sign areas shall not exceed one square foot per lineal foot of building
frontage. Specifically for the Keypoint signs, the wall signs shall not exceed 44
square feet. Revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
;2-5
Resolution No.
Page 3
EXC-2005-04
March 3, 2005
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
¡)-(O
Mr·'I· ,
~1!JJ..
<.Ie",' .~'W'4\w
[JGliTI!oIG. ~
......,.-- ~ ~ v
.-...~..":.... -...-
MA:~iTH'¡il.NO
February 14, 2005
CITY OF CUPERTINO
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
There are other signs in the area that are thirty-Six
(36") LETTER HEIGHT:
"Cathay Bank" accross the way on
Oe Anza Blvd and also "New Image Furniture" on the same
building that we are proposing signage for "Keypoint
Creait Union"
This building has very large Sign Bands. Twelve feet
(12') on the West Elevation and six feet (6') on the
East Elevation.
We feel that our client should be aforded the same
advantages as other businesses in the area.
Sincerely,
Mia Way Enterprise Inc.
I
¡. !/~¿iÞdi;[¿)7iJY::.)
Mike Strouse -
Sales Representative
d--::¡""
; il 1'. ,\, ",~ r:ï\~! i-~
- \ " ' \ ¡ '\ .\ :~\ ('.-\! ,I í 1,¡P'\,'I\
LTi')H)\·¡ il!:~ 'Ii-;~~ 'il)')!,
rr(\'() ",I H!
EXC-2005-04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 203
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW 36-INCH SIGN LETTERS WHEN
18-INCHES IS ALLOWED.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-04
Mike Strouse (Midway Signs)
10495 S. De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2005-04, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
EXC-2005-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
March 3, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. 203
Page 2
EXC-200S-04
March 3, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Keypoint, 10495 De Anza Blvd," received
January 7, 2005, except as amended by this resolution.
2. SIGN PROGRAM
The sign program shall be revised to reflect the allowance for 36-inch tall wall signs.
Revised sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department
prior to issuance of any building permits.
3. SIGN AREA
The wall sign areas shall not exceed one square foot per lineal foot of building
frontage. Specifically for the Keypoint signs, the wall signs shall not exceed 44
square feet. Revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Saadati and Acting Chairperson
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. 203
Page 3
EXC-200S-04
March 3, 2005
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Is/ CiddyWordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
I sl Lisa Giefer
Lisa Giefer, Acting Chairperson
Design Review Committee
:~
,~
I~
'"
!~ffi
~§
~~
....2
...:::i
..
>-
~i3
iSz
-0
!:O
frl~
~~
wx
~~'"
iwffi
-OX
0:0:>-,
"::>0
00>-1
I-øm,
~
~ ~I --
Z E--
o <:....,_
~ ~ ~
U a::I ~ j
OJ O,__~
'- - 151:0 -' t
caO .
--.- , <:...., . I
E-- ~ . I
.- 00 ~ I l!i
OJ ~ ~ ~ B " ~ ~~ z~~ ,
Q 23 ~ R!;¡. . goo" 0:
Z· <n 0', .!!.J ffi-->-g-S >-z<zw
a::: ..... a::,' => zll:: Z z~ ::
µ) I '2 Q @ ~ ¡..;;¡ ~~'6 0 ~ ~g ~§~~ ~~~~
> 0 rJ) >- ~ ow.! z ~ w~ c::wo~ ",NID::
'" ~OJ Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 115 8~ C)~t;w ~cd;~
I-"'.s:::. 0. 1ù r.n.c:: 0::« zOwa:: .....oz~
,,~ \ :r= :t: ::j w~...J W i: 1: GI- ¡OZo. >(Iw"'"
µ.! ..-I ~ ~ <!: 9li~ ~ 51 ~::J~ ¡¡~8§ ~~¡H
u <D ~ z I!
..,~ u.J
µ'; u.. . .
'\i ><
l____l~_ ÇQ
..
X
o
>-
~
>-
o
W
\~
~~
0<
o;!!
!!O:
","
::J~
=1 II
:;; I() I~¡,
=;--, Cf i ~ :
&! ";',1 0 I c.? I
~-~
un!"!
Ie I '<
=" . CI:
~ ~
,
'"
~
--
~
'-'
¡;.;'
~I
ð
~I I .
. I §I
I <'
....' -;' l' I
u ,.1..
~ 0 It)
~ Co ="
,.... ì,~
~ ,;;
00 '
I~.. f;;J ~.I>'
r-;¡,<.... ~
¡;!IZ !;;!ü
~ =~,
S; ...[
T
-1
xC>
>-z
;::f:,,
"'-<II
a::~?:i:!:::
1!'0:::l::>
:::¡¡ZLLO
~ozz
"~Oo
"0 '0
;g;w@...I
~~~~
æ:O<2
"
z
i<
s;::
"'~
0<
wo
>-z
!!I 0
~o
~w
::>'"
>-
5
o
z
o
o
!::!
'"
....
~
~
'I
.ì
-,,,:~::.y
0:
W
,.
0:
~
'"
z<
~~
'--
~
a:
c.
r c.
Ii <
'-.
1 I
~~
~~
I u
!
i
i
,
í
o
a:
Q
.~
r,
,.¡
I ·
"
..
..
'"
-
~
tJ
~
\C
0'\
\C
0'\
I
N
QC
0'\
--
QC
=>
~
~
~
~
-<
U
~
-<
~
U
~
Z
-<
00.
~
~
~
~
00.
~
~
~
00.
00.
-<
=
=>
0'\
N
~
=>
t--
~
0'\
I
N
QC
0'\
--
QC
=>
~
--
..
~
-------
--------
31.IS 1.:>3rOl:ld
:
m i I~ .
i· . -
IOI'fJHM¡7 6 ~ ;1·"
a ll)nSIof,
-
"
"]lArK
nQ!
Ol~
m
~
ç
~
'CIA"
~ .
Ii
"
ñ
x
., I;;: lõ ~
0
x x
z x "" It~~iii ::t11' \~ \ 0 ~ /J
·
~ -0 _ ..,1111....
~ ~ ~ - - mHI:>Jft
a " " Ii!
1.I,ä'lW) ! ~ " . 'I1ttV JOMS' [~ ~).,. .... WIØ1M II.,
:=¡ ¡:=
~ ;: !_~: .... 1., ",J""'O ¡ ,NfJ \'£:. - ÇJiI010
n ~ I \ ~
; ~ '15L) :z Ä \ ¡: 'Vi 'VlY.Il·
~
~ 0 t'1OS " 3Ð311CXJ \ ~ \ ..:s: ~ loW
» ~ """" ,.". \ ,,~ \ ." ~ ....."
.. ",'1)H~ iii "I ~'" . \ \ '~ LS :11.1
IS )n~U OOY ~ J(1 DIU Il1d.l J.. 'flHV30' \ r~ A'INJeMiI
~lØ '¥'"'3Y. :z
§ - \ \\ ~ AY'UII
lSIItNm: ; ·
~ · ~ A"INOI
Ii ~ , '.
Ii · I :s:!~ " <
· I ~ r
01]IJOJS~ ,~ "'J~N :J I""" ' íP\ \:::
0
.
.
œ
~
<
!"
IÎÕ
/if Or.>
-.JL
01H..-
"
1)lij"
.
1131"1:1 "MOl
:
. -~"
Õ
»
:0'"
~1II",a~'¡"'.".;"...,
»
dJ~NI11091~
'"
..
"0 Smoa
.~I '"' '0' ,.
1!)If\'JY'I]Q
~ .~
z :::
~ ~ ¡ Q
~ '10.,.
~
"'
.,
..
~
~
~
õ
x
.. "rli
dVLAJ AIINI~I^
_. ·-_-0_____---
.___n___ __
-----_._._--~-. ------~--
t
"~'
,
,
I i
: --·t
L
..J.
\!
r"-·-- ..
"
f"Ill
,
",
,,',
.... ",01.'
I .
.,:Ll i
.."
- --yr ,
j'" .
II'
Ylit--;
/1:1 ¡¡¡
HI!:'ì:; -
, /. I, n
" I 1" )Þ
r I Ii. ~
'lit
¡II:
1
I·
'T¡:.I
l "
. I'
i :
..,j:
if'li:
I
j l :
: i ¡
i I· : j~!r._ '
D. 1 Y';L ~ on_.
L
~.
,....,. .
".....~
.f!'
: x'
o' .,
o'",~' '14,
/ ... ......
..'/.... , ;~
"//-'-</
'·í ./
~ /....
.< .
.
., --f"'-
,
,
,
, !!
, ~
j I"'p l
· .
Ë' 'E
· . , I
~ i ·
·
,,'!(',
\! I /'·~'''Ii
;. l\:
;'1
, ~ 11
; ..
i ! .
" :
'f " , .
I. i (eli- . .
¡ I ¡
'I ~ .
. I : !i
i6. f , I ,
, it ~
..", r t
~¡:j ;
¡./i
FJI. .
6 . ~ J
'I'"
~1¡1 .
¡::.. ,
!OF
,;f'
h:ø
/-'
;/'/ i"
)' ' .
.(', / <,/ 0,0 V /'
. ~"/4~ ,.., / .
~;~/~ /. / .
( .,,' ,.'
(~ : (~~9"
!~~~-
¡ ~, J.
~ - ' " r
i 0 \ ¡ .
Z "
rO'
*
I(
~ t
·
.. .
, .
. .
i~
r
J
'"
~
·
·
·
..
o
z
!
J'_
"h
- . .-
¡I!I"
'.
i f
!!
¡ f
,.f,
J ~
~. \
OoOOOGlDO
£0'., ~Ot--' "."'1.' ~
90 "f --¡
<> ....'11$.'
,~,\I 1=
, J~.!'
,
'H·
:~
,,' i
i
I
I
,
.
¡
~~,.
/.-Á:~:/ ~ ::o¡¡=_
/ tt ..:.
. / ~ ~
/' 1.¡1..·.·__.
.-/ "" *,'.,..
" 1
u
Z
I ""~ "'I' '<1
". . .'.'¡.. , . " .' I~
... ¡: .. 'I- ~ )I t·.... I!
. I~ "...,... 1~1 ...... ..
," ".." .'} '1:'- ...
," ·'+"O........,....¡--
< / \
~',,>'" ,It
1 y. ..~ ,-
fl.'.' "'01_
~ ."
.'
f¡"--
, .
Ii >-
~
¡I ..'
A.._:..~··
If"
.
'.
,
---
-------------
4
01 \Js ~
j' ~
c: ~
~ ~
+- .'
.¡:.
:.
, ·-=Ÿ
',-
'-
--
o
a:,
Qi
I
~
Î
\
I
I
r-- .-1-
'"
~
i Iii
... . I
~J'
:><1 0 ~
~ iEi ~
~.
...
ð
~I, 1 ~I
dl :91 t
~ 8,i or¡
IE-< t'1 ~
:z; ...:'=
:< ~
i 00 ':z;
~"-II § ~I ~ ~
E-< ~ U
00 0 0
E-< ... ...¡
'E-<
I ¡;j 1 r-·r-·_·
100 I '
1< .
i~ i
!~
iN
II')
~
I
~ 1 ~
1 0
Q]I ~
~, ~
~, ==
I'~
\
';I - \j
~ J
(-~ §
~.-
Ir~ ~ ..
~ ~. ~ C
~....
.--=
CIC
"= '..---.. ..
.... ¡"¡¡' ¡.,¡¡ ><
.. E-<':i! ~
,~ ~ U ~
¡.¡ rIJ ~
'8, ==
'8,1 ~.
, ,
~
6ë"
=
....
'-'
~
..--...-..
/"",-...
---..-------
------.-
----.-
I
II
l'
I
I
,
I
I
, I
,
I
, ,
if:
I'
I Ii
I;,
. ,~.
,I
WI
'0
M
o
N
C
(fi
o
c
o
ã5
~
Q)
:6
~
~
----
---.--
---
________n__
I I
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
Application: EXC-2005-03
20807 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Date: March 3, 2005
Project Description: Sign exception to allow two blade signs and to exceed the allowed
wall sign height on an approved commercial building
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of EXC-2005-03, based on the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Peers Coffee, will occupy approximately 1,830 square feet of a 7,100
square foot new commercial building, currently under conStruction. The building was
approved by the City Council in June, 2004. The exceptions requested are for:
Two blade signs
Two blade signs are proposed, on the north and south elevations, respectively. These
result in more signs than the ordinance allows, and projecting signs are not specifically
allowed in the sign ordinance. Therefore, an exception is needed.
Wall sign height
Two walls signs are proposed, one on the south elevation facing Stevens Creek
Boulevard and one on the north elevation facing the parking lot. The sign ordinance
allows two walls signs if one of them is directed to the interior of the project and is not
visible from a public right-of-way. Therefore, the exception is only for the height of the
proposed wall signs. The sign ordinance allows a maximum wall height of 18 inches,
and 26 inches is proposed. (Signs are measured to the exterior limits of a border or
background.)
Illuminated window lo~o sign
An illuminated window logo sign, totaling approximately 5.75 square feet, is proposed.
Logo signs are exempt if they do not exceed four square feet and are not internally
illuminated. Staff recommends that this sign be reduced to two square feet and not be
internally illuminated, so that no sign exception is needed for it. The wall and blade
sign are sufficient to identify the business.
3- J
March 3, 2005
EXC-200S-03
DISCUSSION:
Findin~s for Exception
Per Section 17.44.040 of the Municipal Code, the Design Review Committee may grant
an exception based upon the following findings:
A. Literal Enforcement of the Sign Regulations will result in restrictions inconsistent with the
spirit and intent of this title.
The intent of the Sign Ordinance is to "provide architectural and aesthetic harmony of
signs as they relate to building design" and to "provide [sign regulations] that will
allow for good visibility for the public and the needs of the business...." The wall sign
height is exceeded by eight inches due to the sign background. Staff believes the sign is
attractive and is enhanced by the background. If the whole sign area were reduced to
18 inches, the letters would be too small.
Blade signs have been approved in other projects, like Travigne, because they add to the
pedestrian character of the development, in that they are strictly directed to pedestrians,
not to auto traffic as typical wall signs are. The blade height (nine feet from grade) is
adequate to allow pedestrian passage.
B. The granting of the exception will not result in a condition that is materially detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare.
The signs do not create any health or safety problems.
C. Least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will
accomplish the purpose.
The height of the wall sign provides adequate visibility for the lettering; a smaller size
could result in letters too small to easily read. The length of the wall sign (8' 4") is less
than that allowed by the ordinance (21 feet).
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Plan Set
G: \ Planning\ DRC\staff rep \2005\ EXC-2oo5-03.doc
2
3-.;L,
EXC-2005-03
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW TWO BLADE SIGNS AND TO
EXCEED THE ALLOWED WALL SIGN HEIGHT ON AN APPROVED
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-03
Paul Bosman (Peers Coffee and Tea)
20S07 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2005-03, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
EXC-2005-03 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
March3, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
3-~
Resolution No.
Page 2
EXC-2005-03
March 3, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Peet's Coffee and Tea Sign Standards,"
except as amended by this resolution.
2. ILLUMINATED WINDOW LOGO SIGN
The illuminated window logo sign shall be reduced to two square feet and shall not
be internally illuminated.
3. SIGN PROGRAM
The property owner shall submit a sign program for the entire building within 60
days of this approval or prior to any additional sign proposals, whichever comes
first.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
G:I Planning 1 DRCI res 12005 1 EXC-2005-03 res.doc
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
3-4
EXC-2005-03
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 204
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW TWO BLADE SIGNS
AND TO EXCEED THE ALLOWED WALL SIGN HEIGHT ON AN
APPROVED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-03
Paul Bosman (Peers CoHee and Tea)
20S07 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2005-03, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
EXC-2005-03 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
March 3, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. 204
Page 2
EXC-200S-03
March 3, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Peers Coffee and Tea Sign Standards,"
except as amended by this resolution.
2. SIGN PROGRAM
The property owner shall submit a sign program for the entire building within 60
days of this approval or prior to any additional sign proposals, whichever comes
first.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020( d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Saadati and Acting Chairperson
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Isl Ciddy Wordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
Isl Lisa Giefer
Lisa Giefer, Acting Chairperson
Design Review Committee
G: \ Planning \ DRCI res \ 2005 \ EXC-2005-03 res.doc
g£Q€Ql:JdleðeIMepueluð'H¡:ØJJOll:Jd/1le11e& o:J.,leedl:Jdl.^"~Vs¡:>eloJdleJn¡oe¡!u",veLlloJ:J:uOIIU'OI"IU
SU0!l"CA;;I1:>I lO!l;;l]X'iI I09V
:\~""C' .",~.,,,."_'A"__ .~~.-:¡.-:~;-.[¡
i
,1
:1
;.~
¡;,
'I
~
'>'1
~
-~}
I~
~
"
/'... ;""~l ..
r -'-
,
,.
,
I'
¡:
~:
.,
~
;¡
~
.
~3
-,
~~
<
,
:;;
,
N
o
.Q
.
>
Æ1"
~ .
- "
o.
~!!<
~~
::It.
,S¡
~".
-{
-{
-{
-{
IT-tl 0
0
-
~
.
~
"5",
z c
~
.
-{
,-,-,_.
~,
j~j~j~F~!
",,,','
,',',',',','
::::::;:::;:
::;:;:::::;:
::::::::::::
,',',',',','
,',',',',','
::::::::;:::
,',',',',','
.w:,:,:,:,:
:':':':':'
,',',',','
,',',',','
,',',',','
,',',',','
,',',',','
,',',',','
I:::::::::
,',',',','
i',',',','
::::::::::
H~~H
i""','"
i',',',','
I:':':':':
I':':';,;,
',',',','
I:':':':':
!J~H~
,',',',','
,',',',','
':::::::::
,',',',','
',',',','
':':':':':
::::::;:;:
,',',',','
",',',','
',',',','
',',',','
',',',','
',',',','
',',',','
:i:i:;:::
',',',','
',',',','
:::::::::
.',',',','
i',',',',','
;:;:i:i:;:::
n~lJ
::::;:;:::::
,',',',',','
,',',',',','
,',',',',','
,',',',',','
,',',',',','
~.:':':';':
~~:~J
': ': ': :; ,~
¡~ ¡~ 1~ ;:'
::::
,; ,~,
"
I'~
-{
>8lC~~S¡~ nü,¡jt,"~!7' OC6f6 .'U'DI'I"J ,aI''";! '1.""5 r,n~~pu,08~¡¡
aJnpa~!'pJ\f aWOJJ
-
.()-,a
"
g
.
"
ø
z
~
9
o
.
w
~
~
'" ·I~
c:z",
~:520'
...."'"""
-{
::"
,','
,','
':';',
:':';,
i:i:i:;:,
,..,..,'''''
,',','....
,',',',',',
,',',',',','
,',',',',','
,',',','"''
,',','..,','
¡.iiiiiiiii
,',',',',','
,',','...."
,',',',',','
::i:;:;:;:
::i:;:;:;:
i:;:;:;:::
~IT~
,',',',','
':':':':':
',',',',',
~t:n
,','",
,',',',','
,;,;':';':
;':':':':'
':':';':':
:':':':':'
,',',',','
,',',',','
::::::::::
¡'¡'¡!¡i¡
,',',',','
,:,:,:,:,'
:';':':':
,','..,',
1TJ
,',',',',
,:!!it!i¡:
"',',, ,
,',',',',',
':':':':':'
',',',',',',
',',',',',',
:::::::::::;
j:j:j:j:!:!:
H~t~¡
:':':':':':
,',',',',',
:::::::::::
::;::i:::::
',',',',','
:':':':':';
,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ': ,
z
~
~¡:
~~
~g
.
o
"
00
7."
~~
<0
o
S
N
o
"
ø
~
!;\
]
~
~~
" -
,0
U~
q
, -
';;.5
N ,
g g.
gu
J
l
~ .....
·CIt).....CIO
o -011)"
C.!~OO
-CCIOC'I)-o
- 0 I
"'-~C'I)It)
9!.0=»N.....
""0 _~"
O¡;¡G>__
E..... 0)..... 0-
- . '00.....
CZ;O::CIO:!J
OC'l)....-
G> oo::r ~ .. ..
ZNwA.u..
~
N
~
ð§
c:-
c: ~
"'.-
1!~
æ=
.~ g>
U 5'2
(!);e~
>.u>'"
.c 8. -g
l?;:¡..
~\'lg>
o Q)'-
o..~E
"'.£1> ~
.cu>>.
S-g-c
2:ë m
.c ª1!l2
.!II '0 i .,
c: -
i£ ~'E.g
.1; ~ B 8
8? e "0 eo Õ
_ :::s~2;> AI""",
.~ :;;::;;:~~,¡:¡ fj.s1ü
Q) . . u ~ ~ .- c.. en
- S!"". ~~ ij!'-o
~ ~~~~~ 'O~~
~~.I;
¡' ~~ ¡~~
11 ~ ~~.s
-a; '" Q.. ~ 7,¡ g>.g 'Š
to iì'" ~ ·_~ü
~llðlJ s <:> š; ~
.5'Vi=
-+
~( 1 ~
z ",.
0
31 ¡:::
u
a¡ g =>
-fi 11 2 >.~ f!:
~ 9 '"
£ "'" z
'" ~ -¡en en '" 0
IS - i€c, u
.~ ~ ~,,!Ii @
JJ! ..0 0.. >-x- I
E B " .!:" ~
" . '" ë.
1õ E - - ï
~ ii ~ ~1i e /.,
. -l! .2'i g ." .~
'f!! ~ ~fD tI= c
'" ~ ~ .-~~ .2' ,¡; '"
~ '" ~ .....
~
~
~
o
.V')
~
c¡)
~
,
~I
:.,.
ëo
-d
> "'"
- -
I:Q 0
"'" or)
.., 0..
..,
" u <
~ VI U
~ = .
Oð .., 0
> .S
.., .., t:
~ èi5 ~
o r---- §
U :¡; U
~ ~ ..
.., G> '"
~ it; '5 §
.. CI).. ~
ëG>CI)..
G>-a~.!
='0.-0
Uc(UC
-~~
C"\ t:'.t~~~
:;~;¡.Si.~
~~~'ã!1
~à':æ!::!
c
0
!
w
.c
~
0
U)
'"'
~
z
I~ a)
~
~
~i!5
.... Ñ
!::'
Þ
'"
:..
õo
~
'"
",ã¡i
i::!1~:o
-~~
- co
g
...
..;
~
I N I
--
II
..
...
U
-I
!~ ê'
0 ..
co
C) ...¡
.9 -
"
C co
...
$. ¡g 'S -
.~
i ð 0 ...
.J::. "
- ...
'~ þ
~ ~ co
C -
o U) C) ~
co
Z ëi) ...¡
ø ...
-
ëñ å) .~
C .. Q
.- '0
.c ~ ¡¡;
0 'C
"
U 2 ~
Q. ~
~ e
co
01::
'2.
~
~
<r>
E
~
~
:.õ
fj .,
fj <r> 0.
J!! g. -ª
'0.._
<r> . c:
.!ìj E B
'" ::I u>
~ 'êij ~
o ~ g
:-..--=
s
~
€
z
o
~
g
....
I
L_
if,
¡~
~
¡
,
'i
I
t!! t
~ ~
~ It ¡¡
a m ~
~
.-. ,;I.
..,..-:-:--.-
_..-
¡
i
,
!.
f"""r-. --- -l
,.
~ 1 1 I.
~
..:...
" C II) ... GO
u( )'OII)....
C_'II:I'oo
-COOI")'O
- .. 'I
ell( ) ~ I- I") II)
C;:)N...
æ u -'11:1'....
Cell( )_....
E IU æ... 0-
- ""Co...
5~ã2!2.~
( )'II:I'~....
ZNi:i:iA.u..
'\
-d
>
¡¡:¡
..I<
CI)
~
0:1 U <
~ '" U
~ '" .
.'>1 CI) 0
"'" ;;. '"
CI) CI) 'f
!ê ~ CI)
Or-Po
U ~ 81 I J
'" 0
t;NQj
æ ¡,; '5 I
.. II) ....
ê( )CI)..·
( )i5~.!
="C.-c~
Oc(OCa
l ~
"C
~
e
Q.
~
,
r
l
o
j
"C
.!
c
C
"E
:::I
õ
C
o
Z
Q)
" ~o.
i;W¡¡XiÚi¡-"
c"'"
{}}. en
o'IS 0
i ~
~ ~
o t/)
... z
¡ ~
A.
c
0
:;::¡
~
CI>
¡¡¡
.c
'$
0
t/)
o
.c
1::
0
Z
u.:
en
~
<ri
tn
cò
N
g
'"
;:~ ~
--"'~o Q.
ilt!~=i~8
~lll ~ IJI~
jg
i:¡ '"
.c. ~ ~
'" '"
'2 ~ '"
¡¡: 9 c:
~ ã ~
'" .
~ .~ ~
'C 51
Q) '"
õí .
::e ~
~I
-- -
C')C') C')
(:).,.....,.... 10"""
N....s,s,o>ç;,N
C5lli ~!ìì!ìì i ~ i
8 ~~~~~~~
z
o
!;;:
u
o
...J
i\
"'C ø is
~ ;::.!!:!
~ ~a¡~
-- '"
..
~~
0'-
-~
"0
!ã-*
"'es.
CD
~E
~.~
C1ii
~
~
,
co
'"
fJ
J!!
c
.2'
(/)
ë6
Õ
I-
-
N
-
,;¡
"
'is.
'" 'ª
..J ! :SE~.8
~ § ª >< ª
t ~'~~'ø
g ~ãi- ~
() ><!o ~
n- o: ~;:: Q)
n- O i:ij ¡i. I
c( '-'''''',) ...J
¡:!;
4
....~.-. "I~ w
CI
Z
0
~
...J
¡:!;
en
~
z
(!)
¡¡;
II1I1 CI
w
g I 11111 ~
u..;
.
W
...J
CC
.. II :::>
. . 8
.~ 1JI I
~ I
" "W-8l
g>
"
~
~
~
'j
~
~
\
¡
\
,
[¿
.~
~
ï
J
..:...
. C !2 ... CIO
() -."....
C.æ·OO
-CClOCW)oQ
- D I I
~-Þ-CW)II)
~D:JN...
..., () -.....
DU)G)....._
Ew æ...o.
- ''00...
cZæClO~
OCW) -
G)...:III:....
ZNWa.U.
,
"<:i
2:~
co8
..><:~
" 0'>
"
.. u <I';
~ '" U
Q .
-~~gl·~
'""'; OJ .- 0
J! cÏ5 1:: ¡:¡¡I
o t" == ~
Uou~
'" 00
.. 0 ..
'd) N '" ;
" '" =,
ø.. ¡';Õ ¡¡¡
.. en .... "'"""
+-Ø)cn...
¡-a~.æ.,
u:¡o8
l
'0
~
2
Q,
~
i
is.
~ i"
'" -
o
a¡ ~ §
:2 ~ Co)
~ f! - §
~ 15 .~ ~
,5 "" j._
.. .. Q:I E
~ 0, ..2
...... ..... _0 =
- >< §. g'
.!J1 ,g ,15,-
'C, c:
. ..., '11 .,
~ ..c == >
...... (I) ... Q)
OO.æ-S!'E
-g-¡3~
: ~ -g .5
~ ~ 8 15
is. ..2 ~ E
1:: ..c ¡¡:: >-
8. IN æ
Q. :;:: Q)
" - ~
~ .. o..e
'3 N ¢:: U)
'E .>< '" g
8 ~ - c::
. ><.j 8
q . e-= ës
- "'§-
. ., J!!
~ j c:~ 5!
;5 g,.~ CL j
,ii 0 ~ 0 c:
1"6~i¡ I
C/)~.sO)þ
c::..c c:.5 c .s
jJ¥~'§~ ~
Sa¡ ì¡@e ü
c: '!: c: c:!I! ~
cW'[Æ ·~Æ i=
c
0
=
~
c:,!!
.2 W
'§.c
..J~
U)
Sjg¡
<.,;
j U)
~Q
$ ð
8~
'" z
.. ø
i ;;;
a..
!g
.J:: :§
.~ :¡¡
~
;:f
:f!!
j
~ j'~I"'~I'
Õ;-",c:.g Q
c::¡.q:tG:sæ~a
i à:liii~::x:;¡¡
I~II~IJ t~ -J -J 8
-- -
..- ("')('0') ("")
- --'l)-
"''''~¿'¿''''¿''''
.2 ii~~~i~i
~ ~~æ~~~i~
~
J
.~
IJ
..,
i
~
~
{¡
~
~
811 'Iii
B ~ CIJ ~~
'" .-!€
""ì3,<:¡
- ~~
j .'" i:i
'0 ~ ~~
~ - ",<"I
I~
I !)~~ 01 "g·,S 'NI~
,
(::!
;;;;
'"
-
g
!!J/ I S8pe^
d!J!j
2,2
¡!:~
=:i t ... .
I!!~ (¡
M
"
8'
~ 2 ~ j{
~ go '~lIš ~i~j
§ 111
@ ~ ë. q.5'š~ . ,þ ~
~ E ;- E~"\1 - § ~ 'Ii. --
~ ~ -.¡¡ II ,I. &. ~ i ~
""g ... 1J U
~.t ~ lJ! j i ¡ ~
~
~l ~ .e~ j ¡ ~ ~
gõ ~ ... & w ~
~ 'ï .... ~ F-"
ci
ci
S:
-
b
-
,. ;~
¡
f
.~
~ t"1 ~ ~
if
9i\j) )æ> ~
r)\ ~ 0 ~. ' ,
2j~ .
I ~f') -!. S.
I:.J
§ t!!
~ ~ ì
t
¥ Q ü)
,.
'\........;.....- ---. ...- ~,.¡,¡,.
~
,g
'"
r
~
w
¡¡;
; It",JI
1<: 1<3-