Loading...
PresentationVallco -:- Plan Environment moa Impact R [.1j Purpose EIR 0 Inform decisio n makers .lejAa/Spublic a - '0 project a OD Identify measur davoid reduce - u - impactso- _ oG 9 Identify _ 3lIj �'ra3,ij�rl [�U ,/i6A't' to projelct l -! �,�-9 .`j °.�If �, i� aii N.> eRe the i�r t� or r Draft EIR Initiatedin . y2017/Completed 'in May 2018 6 Analyzed .} of alternatives, \\dat} e% Is, Proposed P — GP Allocatioin $ /� aildout. w}t Max. e o res. Allocation z� R eta ) \ R e s }d e n / }a I \ Occupied/Re-Tenantedmail VJllcO Specific Plan EIR . . < EIR Amendment Incorporate community benefits: Cl� H Cit yaH a , Performing Arts Center Space for shoo Revised �: � r `\ }, � } g � 9 [ncludes R e s po e m to S Text Revisions to Draft EIR a n d EIR 0717T! � m"'Zow daft �)Uppllementa,l Text Rev*is'ions . Refine Mitigation Mea.ur ss Make corrections 0 substantial c gs to the analysi s t I AlIternat'i'ves Revis6& Project, Previous Project, and Project Alternatives Development Summary, Land Uses Commercial Office Hotel Res de ial ic Green (square (square oms) (dwelling Space Roof ssfootage)units) (square fekf RevisedMProject,460,600 r ►rt _ i� Previous Project* Project Alternatives . G• Buildout with Maximum Residential _ and Residential AlternativeRetail . Il Occupied/Re-Tenanted Mall I _ _ EI ,207,774 Housing Rich Afternativell *Iii Draft and project alternatives analyzed in the 'Projectject I e e . . Revised Project ~ 46,0,,000 s.\. o/ commercial 1,750,000 .f. of off ) e . ^\ 339 h rooms e ) 7� ` 23 residential units � 0, 35,,000 - ,\ , civic sp:'e 6 ^ ( acres green � r �o\ ��. V011cO Specific Plan E/R * Air Quality * Biological Resources e Greenhouse Gas @ Hazardous Materials: Va1lco Specific Plan EIR MjII#II 11011 �i Recreation Revised Project Transportation Analysis Scenarios • Scenario 1: Existing Conditions • Scenari-o 2m Existing with Project Conditions • Scenario I Background Without Project Conditions • Scenario a Background withproject Co,n&'tions • Scenario 5: Cumulative Without Project Conditions Total •ai ® r •rFreeway eSegments i 9 Impact: r � �� 'rvrf / :e I t Valls® Specific Plan EIR < 3,8Ilk p API � s » Rd u� 'i�. m> r Some ilk Tor Aye ` » SE- Qim. ills! %4£ f Binh R r,, ���*� r }•� �:, ,�� `�� `� n S <n ap WrldMg Rai r Lw11.{$"# RyAS FITi Y S ae Aim 7-1 04 in NOW go; To oil =00, RAY A - me q t silly. WON oa� ARE < 3,8Ilk p API � s » Rd u� 'i�. m> r Some ilk Tor Aye ` » SE- Qim. ills! %4£ f RevisedProject Summary of Freeway Impacts Vallc® Specific Plan EIR Vallc® Specific Plan E9 . U A L � TYA I .,I U . L I TY Q t d t O I E perational Air Quality Impact Valla® Specific Plan EIR mew a i 1= i ®f Projec S n fi3 A+ li Unavoidabje a r _• ng -term Nois ,o e Level 1- r,J Operational Quality t 1 Vallc® Specific Plan EIR I TUAL0Y C t :. . :: T , � � 2>x,. 2�n/� §���\ A \� ]r`%\/� \/ �,/ `�: y:° z �� .. ^.>_ «- � '` � (!) � ^ �r22� � > ! - J` :, , to n:§ § lE/J « z w Cultural Resource �. GHIG� Operabonal A Qua].Ity ) VJllcO Specific Plan EIR 0 M% * d go'hro'ect - Impacts!. to :,_r j Less than QUALITT Hazardous Matenail Opera�blonal Air Quality I Vallc® Specific Plan EIR sj{{ Air ty I It C_'' .cI rtl Quall I i!^II t {/®�zl��� r i I }{®!ii I j� k r� f,� ;® �I i 9 Valle® Specific Plan EIR Summary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Platt Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous with retail end Re -Tenanted No Project Mousing Impacts residential Rich Project Project Makimuna Alternative Mall AIternaative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Aesthetics Impact AES -1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not result in significant aesthetic impacts. Impact AES -2: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS TSI LTS alternatives) would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative aesthetic impacts: Agricultural resources Impact AG -1: The project (and project ISI NI NI NI NTl NTI NI alternatives) would not convert farmland, conflict with zoning for agricultural use, or conflict with a Williamson Act contract. Impact AG -2: The project (and project NTI NI NI NI NI NI NTI alternatives) would not conflict with existing zoning of :forest lanai or timberland, or result in the loss or conversion of forest land. Scuumary € fProje+ct and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous with Re#ail and Re -Tenanted No Project Housing Impacts Project Project Maximum Residential Residential Alternative Rich Residen2tial Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Air Quality Impact AQ -1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NII LTS alternatives) would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. Impact Aid -2: The construction of the SUM SUIM SUIM SU/NI LTS NI SU/M project (anti General Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and housing Rich Alternative) would violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air.' quality violation. Impact AQ -3: The operation of the project SUM SUM SUM SUM LTS NI SUM (and General Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential. Alternative,, and Housing Rich Alternative) would violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Impact AQ -4: The proposed project (and SUM SURVI SUM SUIM LTS NI SUM General Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Saionmary of Project and. Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Retail and Occupied/ Raising Impact7S Revised Previous '%vith Residential Re -Tenanted No Project Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich ,Alternative) would result in. a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants (ROG, NOx, PM1o, and/or PM2.$) for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air. quality standard. Impact Aft -5: The proposed project (and LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI MIS project alternatives) would not result in a cumulatively considerable not increase of criteria pollutants (CO) for Which the: project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Impact AQ -6: The proposed. project (and SUM SUM SUM SU/M LTS NI SUM General Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative; Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would expose sensitive receptors to substantial construction dust and diesel exhaust emissions concentrations. Impact Ate -7: The proposed project (and LTS/1\4 LTSINJI LTS/TVI LTS/M LTS NI LTS/M General Plan Buildout with Maximum Summary of Project and Pi-oject Alternative Impacts General'I'lan .Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous with Retail and No Project Housing Impacts Project Project maximum Residential Mall Alternative Rich Rich Residential Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would expose sensitive receptors to substantial TAC pollutant concentrations. Impact AQ -8: The proposed project (and LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS project alternatives) would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Impact AQ -9: Implementation of the sum SUM SU/M SU/1V1 LTS NI SUM proposed project (and General Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would cumulatively contribute to significant air quality impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin. Biological Resources Impact BIO -1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not have a substantial adverse effect on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species. / Sumniary of Project and Project Alternative Inipacts General, Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous Avith Retail and Re -Tenanted No Project Housing Impacts Residential Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mail Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Impact BIO -1: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) would not have a substantial adverse eff-ea on riparian habitat, wetland, or other sensitive natural community. Impact BIO -3: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not intcrf-bre substantially with the movement of fish or wildlife species or with established -wildlife corridors, or irapede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Im pact BIO -4: The project (and project LTS LTS us LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Impact BIO -5: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI NI LTS alternatives) would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved habitat conservation plan, rSuin&X9s` ry ofProject '-inn PB'(DJect Altern tine Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised. Previous Avith Retail and Re -Tenanted No Project Housing Impacts ResidentialRiclr Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Impact BIND -5: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS 1'I LTS alternatives) would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative biological resources impact. Cultural Resources Impact CR -1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not cause a substantial strange in the significance of a historic resource. Impact CR -2): The Pr.•oject (and General LTS/A4 LTS11vI LTSIM LTS/M LTS P+dI LTS Plan Buildout With Maximum Residential Retail and residential Alternative, and housing Rich Alternative) would not significantly impact archaeological resources, human remains, or tribal cultural resources. Impact CR -3: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI Ni NI alternatives) Would not destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature. Impact CR -4: The project (and project, LTS/1\4 LTSlM LTS YM LTS/1M LTS NI LTS/1\4 alternatives) would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a Summary of Project and Project Alternative impacts General Plan Buildout Retail, and Occupied/ HousingRevised Impacts Previous with Residential Re -Tenanted No Project Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative significant cumulative cultural resources impact. Energy Impact EN -1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would, not result in a significant. environmental impact flue to the wasteful, inefficient. or unnecessary consumption of energy during construction or operation, Impact EN -2: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plains for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Impact EN -3: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS I;FS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not have a considerable contribution to a significant cumulative energy impact. Geology and Soils Impact GEO-1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects from,. rupture of a known fault, strong Sunin7ary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous iVltlt Retail and Re -Tenanted No Project Housing Impacts Residential Residential Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative seisnuc ground shaking, seismic -related ;round failure (including liquefaction), and/or landslides. Impact GEO-2: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil or create substantial risks to life or property clue to expansive soil. Impact GEO-3: Tlieproject (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result: in on- or off- site landslide, lateral spreading or site subsidence. Impact GEG-4: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) would not be located on soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where Sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water. `Impact GE 0-5: The project (and project. LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not have a cumulatively Summary. of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Previous With Retail an Re -Tenanted No Project Housing HousingRevised. Residential Rich Project Project Maxinium Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative .Alternative considerable contribution to a significant cumulative geology and soil impact. Greenhouse Gas Impact GHG-1: The project (and General LTS/1\4 LTS/1\4 LTS11\4 LTS SU NI LTSIM Plan Buildout with NFaxiinum Residential Alternative and Housing Rich Alternative) would not generate cumulatively considerable GHG emissions that would result in a significant cumulative impact to the environment. Impact G17IG-2: The project (anal General LTS LTS LTS LTS NI NI LTS Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 17JAZ-1: The project -(and General LTS/1V1 LTS/1V1 LTS1M LTS/1'V1 LTS NI LTS/1V1 Plan Buildout with Ma: imuin Residential, Retail and Residential Alterative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would not create a significant.hazard.to the public or tate SII€ntB sai-y of Pi-ojeet and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/Retail Revised Previous With and Re-Tenanted No Project Housing Ii1lpaCtS ResidentialP',icll Project. Project Maximum, Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative environment through routine transport, use, disposal, or foreseeable upset of hazardous materials; or emit hazardous emissions or hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing, or ptoposed school. .Impact HAZ-2: The project (arid project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) is located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5; however, the project (and project alternatives) would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment as a result. lin pact HA7,-3: The project (and project INTI NII NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. lin pact HAZ-4: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not impair implementation. of or physically interfere With an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Summary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Retand OccupieRetail Housing Revised Previous With Re -Tenanted No Project Impacts Project Project Maximum Residential Mall Alternative Rich Alternative Alternative Residential AIternative Alternative Impact HAZ-5: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fres. Impact IIAZ-6: The project (and General LTS/1\4 LTS/Ni LTS/M LTS/ivi LTS/M 1\11 LTS/1\4 Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and housing Rich Alternative) would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative hazardous materials/impact. 'Hydrology and Water Quality Impact HYD -1: The project: (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Impact HYD -2: The project (anti project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Impact 11YD-3: The project (anti project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS. NI LTS alternatives) would not substantially. alter Summary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan. Buildout Retail and Occupied/ Housing Impacts Revised Previous with ResidentialR'rclr Re -Tenanted No Project Project Project Maximum Alternative Ni all Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative the existing drainage pattern of the site or area which would result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding; violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; or degrade water quality. Impact In'D-4: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area; impede or redirect flood Mows; expose people or structures to significant risk involving flooding; or be inundated by seiche, tsunami, or mud'Ilow. Impact HNID-5: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative hydrology and water quality impact. Land Use Impact LU -1: The project (anti project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not physically divide an established community. Impact LU -2: The project (and General LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential SuUnnAs`6ry: of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General'PI'a n Buildout Retail and Retail occupied/ (lousing Revised Previous with Na Project Impacts Project Project Maximum Residential ResidentialMall Alternative Rich Residential Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Ricli Alternative) would not conflict :with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impact LU -3: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) would not conflict with applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Inrpact LU -4: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative land use impact.. Mineral Resources Impact MIN -1: The project (and project NI NI NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) would not result in the loss of availability of a known.mneral resource or locally -important mineral resource recovery site. Impact MIN -2: The project (and project , NI NI NI NI NI NI NI alternatives) would not contribute to a Sntnm ary of Pi-oject and Project Alternative Inipa€ts General Plan Buildout and Occupied/Retail Housing ImpactsRevised Previous with Residential Re -Tenanted { Project Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative' Alternative Alternative significant cumulative mineral resources impact. Noise and 'vibration Impact NOT- 1: The project (and General SUIM SU/M SU/M SUM LTS NI SUM Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would not expose persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the General plan 1vlunicipal Code, or applicable standard of other agencies. Impact NOI-2: The project (and General LTS/1\4 LTS/N/1 LTS/111 LTS/IV1 LTS NI LTS/1\4 Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would not expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration. Impact NOI-3: The project (arid General SUM SUIM SU/1\4 SUM SU NI SUM Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative; and Housing Rich Alternative) would result: in a substantial permanent increase in ambient Summary of Pi-o ject and PB-o jest Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied! Revised Previous With with and Re-Tenanted Njec No Prot Housing; Impacts Residential Rich Project Traject Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Impact NOI-4z The project (and General SUM SUM SUM SUM I,TS NI SUM Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity alcove levels existing without the project. Impact NOI-5: The project site is not NI NI NI NI NI NI NI located within an airport land use plan, witlunIwo miles oda public airport or public use airport, or in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Impact NOI-6: The project (and General SUM SUM SUM SU/M SU I'vI SUIM Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would result in a cumulatively considerable permanent noise level increase at existing residential land uses. Summary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plain Buildout OccupieRetail Revised Previous with Retand Re -Tenanted No Project l=l4aiSiiil; Impaci:.s� Project Project Maximum ResidentialRich Mall Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Population and housing Impact POP -1: The project (anal project LTS LTS LTS, LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not induce substantial population growth in the area. Impact POP -2: The project (and project NI Ni NI NI Ni NI NI alternatives) would not displace substantial numbers of e%isting Housing or residents, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Impact POP -3: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative population and housing impact. Summary of Project and Ps"oject Alternative Impacts Genes"al Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous With Retail andHousingSi Re -Tenanted No Project Impacts Residential Rich Project. Project Maximum Alternative Mail Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Public Services Impact PS -1: Tlie project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) wotild not require new or physically altered five protection facilities (tile construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts) in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Impact PS -2: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not require new or physically altered police -protection facilities (the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts) in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Impact PS -3: The project (and General LTS LTS LTS LTS IMI NI LTS Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would not require new or physically altered school facilities (tile construction of which could Summary of Project orad Project Alternative Impacts General Platt. Buildout Retail anti Occupied/ Housing Revised Previous with . Re -Tenanted No Project Impacts�Resicleiatial Project Project Ma�imunr Mall Alternative Rich Residential Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative cause significant enviromnental impacts) in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Impact PS -4: 'Ilii project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not require new or physically altered library 'facilities (the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts) in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Int pact PS -5; The project (and General LTS LTS LTS LTS NI NI LTS Plan Builtloutwitla.Maxiznum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would not require new or physically altered park- arkfacilities facilities(the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts) in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives, Sunimary of Project and Project°Alternative Inip acts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Occupied) Previous withRe-Tenanted Retail, anti No Project " Impacts Residential Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative Impact PS -6: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not result insignificant Cumulative impacts to public services. Recreation Impact REG -1: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not result in substantial physical deterioration of recreational facilities. Impact REG -2: The Proposed open space LTS LTS LTS LTS NI NI LTS under the project(and General Plan Buildout with Maximum. Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich. Alternative) would not result in an adverse physical effect on the environment. Impact REG -3; The project and project LTS LTS LTS LTS NI NI LTS alternatives would not result in significant cumulative recreation impacts. Transportation Impact TRNLI: Under existing with project SUM SUM SU/M SU/M SU NI SUM conditions, the project (and General Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail Summary of Project and ProjectAltern-,ifive Impacts General"Plan. Buildout Retail and Occupied/ HOtHSiHt � Revised Previous with _; Re -Tenanted No Project: Impacts Project Project Maximum Residential Alternative Rich Residential AlteAlternativeMall Alternative Alternative Alternative and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system; and conflict with an applicable congestion management program, includ,i g standards established for designated roads or highways. Impact TRN-Z: Under background with SUIM SUIM SUtM SU/M SU NI SUIM project conditions, the project (and project alternatives) would conflict, with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing; measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system; and conflict with an applicable congestion management program; including standards established for designated roads or highways. Impact TRN-3:.Project and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternative construction -related -traffic would not conflict. with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy, establishing measures Suou unary of Pn'oject and Pa`o jest: lteu'native Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied! Previous with Retail and Re -Tenanted No Project HousingRevised Impacts Residential Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative of effectiveness for the performance of the circulations system. Impact TRIM -d: The project (and project NI NI NI NI Ni NI NI alternatives) would not result in a change in air traffic patterns that results in substantial safety risks. Impact TRN-5: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS NI NI LTS alternatives) would not substantially increase hazard due to a design features (e.g., sharp'CUrves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.,,- emsfarm firmequipment); and would not result in inadequate emergency access. Impact TRN-G: The Housing Rich LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI SU/M Alternative would conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease'the performance of safety of such facilities. Impact TRN-7: The project (and General SUIIVI SUtM SURVI SUM SU NI SU/T\4 Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential Alternative, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) Summary of Project and Project Alternative atiive Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised, Previous with Retail and No Project Housing Impacts Residential Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative transportation impact. Utilities and Service System Impact UTL-1.: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional 'Fater Quality Control Board. Impact UTL-2: The project (and General LTS/M LTS/JV1 LTS/1\4 LTSfi I LTS NI LTS/1\4 Plan Buildout with Maximum Residential, Retail and Residential Alternative, and Housing Rich Alternative) would require improvements to the existing sewer system, however, the construction of the improvements would not cause significant environmental effects. Impact UTL-3: The wastewater treatment LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS provider (RWli) would have adequate capacity to serve the project (anti project alteratives) demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. Impact UTL-4: Vie project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not require the Surnniary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout Occupied/ Revised Previous with Retail rind Re -Tenanted No Project Housing Impacts Residential Rich Project Project Maximum Alternative Mall Alternative Alternative Residential Alternative Alternative construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. Impact UTL-S: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS 14I LTS alternatives) would have sufficient water supply available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources. Impact UTL-6: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would be served by a landfill witli sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal and would comply with applicable statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Int pact UTL-7: The project (and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS ISI LTS alternatives) would not result in significant cumulative impacts to utilities and service systems. Growth Inducing Impacts Impact GRO-1: The project(and project LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI LTS alternatives) would not foster or stimulate significant economic or population growth in the surrounding environment. Summary of Project and Project Alternative Impacts General Plan Buildout i-ceupied/ Revised Previous With Retail and Re-Tenanted No Project Housing Int pa cts Project Project Maximum Residential Mall Alternative Rich Residential Alternative Alternative Alternative —7 Alternative Meets Project Objectives? Yes Yes Yes Yes Partially No Yes Notes: SU= significant and unavoidable impact; SU/M = significant and unavoidable impact with mitigation incorporated; LTS/M = less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated; LTS = Less than significant impact; NI = no impact Bald text indicate being environmentally superior to the proposed project.