CC 12-17-94
I '.
_.
- '.
CC-892A
.
MINUTES
Cupertino City CoUIICil, Regular Adjourned Meeting
Saturday, Dec. 17, 1994
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 9:00 a.m., Mayor Dean called the meeting to order in Confermce Room A of City HaIl, 10300
TOITe Avenue. Cupertino.
ROLL CALL
CoWlcil members present Don Burnett, Lauralee Sorensen, and Mayor Wally Dean. Council
members absent: Barbara Koppel and John Bautista. Staff present: City Manager Brown, City
Attorney Kilian, and Community Development Director Cowan
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
. STUDY SESSION
I. Legal update regarding League of California Cities -..i......, including housing issues.
The City Attorney reviewœ the State HOUSÌIIg Law and the League of Cities' City Attorney
Section Paper on Housing.
The City Attorney reviewœ the County of Madera Case. It did not provide much clarifiCldion
on the state ~ issue, and part of that case is still P"""i'1g
The City Attorney reviewœ the six findiT. one ofwbicl1 must be made to deny "affordable"
housing projects.
The Community Deve10pmcut Director reviewœ the language of Cupertino's Geœral Plan,
including the Housing Element.
CLOSED SESSION
At 9:47 a.m., CoUDcil rcœss.od to a closed session to discuss the fu110wing items:
1.
Pending litigation (Gm.~........ul Code Section 549S6.9(a) regarding Roman Catholic Bishop of
San Jose v. City of Cupertino (Superior Court Case Number 7J2658J).
.
, ~bcr 17, 1994
cupertiDo City Council
'.2
.
P......il'lg1itìga1ÏOD (Government Code Section S49S6.9(a) regarding Stephen Hau et aJ. Y. City
ofC"""tinu. (Note: This item c:amc to the attention of the City Attorney too late for ~I'Ig
OIl the ageada.)
3. InitiaIinø litiptioa (Go-....UItK4t Code Section S49S6.9(c) - City ofCIIpÐ1ino. Y Spitts, et a1.
2.
OPEN SESSION
At 10:35 LDL City Council reconvcoed in open sessioa. The City Attorney announced that CoUDCil
had taIœn the following actions related to these closed session items:
1. Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose y. City ofCupertilW - no action was taIœn and no direction
was given.
2. S'ephen Haze et. aJ. v. City of Cupertino - City Council directed the City Attorney to respond
to the plaintiff's attorney.
3. City of Cupertino v. Spins. et aJ. - City Council authorized the City Manager to take
ð )pIu 1I iate action.
. ADJOURNED
At 10:37 pm.. Council c:oncuned to adjourn.
.