The URL can be used to link to this page

09-18-18 Item #17 Presentation Vallco Specific Plan Environmental Impact ReportCity Council for the Vallco Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report September 18, 2018 Purpose of an EIR • Inform decision makers and the public about project impacts e-~ 9 It 'i l l ~ \+ev{-1. \, • Identify measures to avoid or reduce impacts • Identify alternatives to the project to avoid or reduce impacts Draft EIR • Initiated in Dec. 2017 /Completed in May 2018 • Analyzed range of alternatives: • Proposed Project-GP Allocation • GP Buildout with Max. Residential -max. density • Retail/Residential • Occupied/Re-Tenanted mall Val/co Specific Plan EIR EIR Amendment • Housing Rich Alternative -June 4 Council SS • Go "long on housing" including increased housing affordability • Incorporate community benefits: • City Hall • Performing Arts Center • Space for schools VaJ·n Sper j1c Pf,u, -: ' Final EIR • Revised Project refined • Includes Responses to Comments • Text Revisions to Draft EIR and EIR Amendment Vo/!, o Sp~cif1c Pion EIR Supplemental Text Revisions • Refine Mitigation Measures • Make corrections • No substantial changes to the analysis • August 2018 • September 2018 • September 2018 -desk item EIR Alternatives Program L•ndUses 600,000 Alter ativ * Retail and Residential 600,000 ll9 4,000 Housing Rich Alternative' Notes:* Project and proie ct alternatives analyzed int e Ora~ EIR. 'ProJect alternative analyzed in the EIR Amend enL - T,m o Tier 2 46o,ooo 1,500,000* Notes·** Addrt1onal 250,ooos f allowed as office amemtyspace that shall not generate add1tionaltraffic Val/co Specif1r: P, }n EJP Revised Project • 460,000 s.f. of commercial • 1,750,000 s.f. of office • 339 hotel rooms • 2,923 residential units • 35,000 s.f. civic space • 30 acres green roof II o St-~·- Environmental Issues • Aesthetics • Hydrology • Air Quality • Land Use • Biological Resources • No i se & Vibration • Cultural Resources • Population & Housing • Energy • Public Services • Geology & Soils • Recreation • Greenhouse Gas • Transportation • Hazardous Materials • Uti l ities & Service Systems Revised Project Transportation Analysis Scenarios · ..... Existing Conditions Cumulative · Conditions .. · : 2018 Counts Pend ing Developments Co mpare Without an d W ith Project Compa ~e W ithout and W ith Proj ect Compare without and With Project Impacts ana Mitigations Impacts and Mitigations .f i Significant and Unavoidable (SU) Impacts • Total number of Intersection with SU Impact: 18 (including not fully funded TIF programs and mitigations with responsibility of other jurisdictions) • Total number of Freeway Segments with SU Impact: 31 Val/co S pec1f1c Pion El.'? i! "'•--! ··1.1:1r,i1ioc.1i9,or . Intersection Analysis WRernlnglonOr 0 l:Fremo11 t Ave 0 I # V 0 i! frw~ J1'iuWay ~ ~ 0 G ' '! ~. £lC11mlnoRta1 G ED .. ~ • Study In tersection Significant and Unavoidable with no feasible mitigation Significant and Unavoidable with TIF mitigation (not fu ll y funded/timing unknown) Significant and Unavoidable with mitigation responsibility of other jurisdiction Impact mitigated to Less Than Significant • Prcju1 Siteo a P,uks Freeway Impacts .. ... Va/!co Specfc Plun EIR Revised Project VMT Analysis I -tmpatledfrctway .ProjectSite .Parks Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Estimates I Project Alternative Revised Project General Plan Buildout with Residential Allocation (Previous Project) Housing Rich Alternative TotalVMT 416,531 330,220 401,316 Average Trip VMT Per Service length P0Rulation1 10.66 29 .7 8 .92 30 .0 9 .71 28.5 Revised Project Significant Unavoidable Impacts AIR QUALITY • Construction Air Quality Impacts • Operational Air Quality Impacts Va/le-a Speof:c Pion EIR Revised Project Significant Unavoidable Impacts NOISE • Construction & Operational Noise Impacts • Long-term Noise Level Increases • ' • ' C: ,/•L Pl I ) E/D Revised Project -Impacts Reduced to Less than Significant with Mitigation • Construction Air Quality -TACs • Cultural Resources • GHG Emissions Val/co Spec,[,,: P/,111 t!P Revised Project -Impacts Reduced to Less than Significant with Mitigation • Hazardous Materials • Construction Vibration • Utilities lmpncl.s 111111:icl AES-I: llu: rrojccl (am.I projec t al!cmativc~) would not result in signific;int ae sthetic imp.icls . Impact AES-2: 111c proj c&t (am.I project altemali ni) would not h.1 \.·c a c umulati vely coruiid crabh: contribution lo a. significant cumulative ac.~th etic impacts. ' lmp11cl AG-I: The project (:ind project all cm:itivc!i ) would not con,·ert forml.:111J, confl ic l wi th 1.0ning fo r agriculturnl use, or co nfli ct wi th 3 Williamson ,\cl cu n1ra cl. lmpnct AG-2: ·nu: project (and project alrcmathrcs) would 1101 conflict with ex isting zoni ng of fores t land or timbcrbnd, or result in the lo ss or conver.ii on of forest la nd. Summnry nr Prnject and Project Altcrn11tin lmp;1ct.5 Rc,·l:m l ProjKt LTS LTS NI P r el'ious Proj ect LTS LTS GeneralPl:l.n Buildout Mnximum Rt'c'i hfcntinl Altc rnalh•e Aeslhcllcs LTS l.TS ,\gricultura l Resources NI N1 NI Relnlland Rl'sidentiul Alternative LTS LTS NI NI Occupied/ R e-Tenanted ~fo ll Alt.crnath·c LTS LTS NI No Project Allernulin NI NI '11 NI Housing Rich Alternalh·e LTS LTS NI lmpacl AQ-l :'l111.:pmj1.:cl (a111l1 11"0j ..:c l all cmali\'C!i) would nol connict with or obs truct impkm..:ntation of tlu: appl icahlc .1irqwli1y pl.111 . lmpucl AQ-2: The: conslruc tio n of the projccl (and Chmc r.tl Plan Buildout with ~fa.xi mum Rc:sidcnlial Alkmativc:, Rttai1 am.I Residential Alh.Tilalivc, and Housi ng R.icl1 Allc:mati ve) would viol :1tc an ai r quali ty ~t:mdard or contriliutr.: sulisl;mti:i.lly to :u1 ex isting or proj.:c1cd air qualil)' \iolation. lmpuc t AQ-3: The: operation oftlu:: projc:c l (a nd G~'fli.:ral Plan Dui ldnut wilh Maximum Reside nti al Alh.:rnJEh •(', Re lail and R.:sidr.:ntial Alh:mati vi; an d l-J ou;;ing Ri ch r\11<."l'TIJl ivc) would ,,.;ol:ite an air Qll.'.ll ity standard or conlri buh: substanli ally lo an ex is ring or projec ted air quality \'iol ation. Impart AQ -4: 111.: proflO!lcd proj ect (and Gem.Til l Plan Dui ldout wilh Maximum Residential Alt('!Th'lli\'c , Rclail and Impacts Rcliiidcn lia l Alternative, and J-lm1\ing Ri c h Alt i:ma ri vc ) wou ld rc9u l! in a cumulati,·c ly con!iiidcrablc net incn:ascorcrir.:ria pol\u1ants (ROG, NOx, PL\'110, and/orPMu) for which lhc projccl region is oon - ana in mcnr und er an applicahlc rcdcral or sl,111l ambient a ir quality s tand:1nl Impact AQ-S: 11,c propoicd projec t (a nd project alt.:maliv(."S ) would n o t res ul t io a cumul31i,'t ly con.~idcr:1lil c nc l increa.1e o f critcria pollutants (CO) for which the pl'ojccl region i~ non-anainmcnt und er an appli ca bl e fedc rill o r slate ambient air quality .standard. Im pact AQ-6: The proposed proj,;:ct {a nd Gcm_-ral Plan nuildout wi1h M:1ximum Reside ntial Alt cmali\'e, Re ta il :intl Rc sidcnli :11 All cmati ve, an d Housin g Ri c h .-\lt cmativc) would ex pos.: gc n ~iti ,·c re.:eptors lo i ubs1.1nl ial cunstructio n dU.'lt and di es el e:<lt.1us1 emi ss ions concentrations. lmp::ic:l AQ-7: ·n u: pr0Jx1111:d proj ec t (and Gc:n,.:r:il Plan Buildout wi 1h Ma."imum Sumnm~· of l'r oji!rt nnd Pnije,·t Altern11th•e lmpm·t~ Hl'l'isc d Proj ect LTS SU/M SU!M SUI:\<! Pr cl·iuus Proj ect GeneralPl3n Uuihluut with Muiimum Re5ldentinl Altl•rnuth'l' ,\irQu:i.llly LTS LTS SU/M SU~f SU/~! SU/1\I SU~I SU/M Retail and Rt•s idcnllal Alterna1\ve LTS Sll/~I SU/~-1 SU/1.1 S umrn11ry of Projcl'l 1md Project Alternuti,·e Impacts Revised Project LTS SUiM LTS~I Prl'l·ious Project LT S sun,-1 LTSflv l Genl'ralPlau Builtlnut with Muilrnum Re!iildentlul Altc rnntlve LTS SUlM l.TSi~:I Retai11111d Re!iihlential A lternative LTS SUIM LTS~t Occupied / Re-Tenanted Mu ll A lte rn atin LTS LTS LTS LTS Orcupicdl Re-Tenanted Mull A lt ernative LTS LTS LTS No Project Altcrnutin NT NI N I NI No Project A lll'rnulil·c NI NI NI Housing Rich All t>tnath·e I.TS SU/M SU/M SU/:\•! Hou.s in g Ric h A)terna th·e LTS SUtM LT S/M lmpacl'i Rc~i<lcntial ,\lh:malivc, lktail and Residential Ahe malivo, and Housing Ri ch ,\ltcmalivc) would cx pusc sensitive rec eptor.. to ~ubslantial TAC pollutanf concc:ntr.,l ions . lmpncl AQ-8: The proposed proj ect (a nd proje:c l allcmalivcs) would not cn:atc objectionabl e odo l"!I affecting a sub~tantial number of p,.:opk. lmp:1ct AQ-9: lmpkmcntalion of th e propos,;:d projec l {:md Gen eral Pl.in Buil doul with Maximum RcsiM 111i.l) Allcmative, Rc:lail and Rcsidcnli al Alll-mativc, :int.I Housing Ridt All 1.-mali l'c) would cumulativel y conlribtu, to significant air quali1y impacts in th~ San Fr.,nci sco Bay Area Air Basin . lmp11ct mo.t: The project (and proj cc l alte rnati ve~) w ould not have 3 suh~tanlial adverse cffccl on speci es itl\."lllificd as a candidil1c ,stll.!liti vc , or s pecial s latus s p.:c ic s. lm(lacls Impact BIO-l : Thc projec t (and projcc l alt.:maliv,s) wo uld n ot ha\',;: a suhslantfal advcnc cffccl on riparian hahilat, wetland, or other sen.~itivc natural communi ly. Impact 810-3 : The projcc:1 (and proj ect al1 .:mali ve!) w ould nol interfere substantially wilh lhc movement offi sh or wildlife: spec ies or with eslabHs hcd wildlife corridoni , orimpcdc th,: U.'ic ofnalivc wildlifonurscrysilcs . Impact lll0-4: The proj e ct (anti pmj cc l alt~mativ.:s) would not conflict with local polici<.:s or ordin:mccs pro1ccling biological resources, such as a tree prcserv,uion pol icy or ordinance. Imp11ct mo .s: The projcc 1 (,mt! projcc t altcmali ves) would not confli ct with the provi sions nfan ado pt ed Habitat Conservati on Plan, Natural Community Cons ('f"V:tli oo Plan , or ocher app roved habitat co nserv alionplan. Summary of Projccl nnd Pn1jcct Altemath·r lm[mclli Re\·lsed Proj ec t LTS SU/M LTS Prl'l'ious Project LTS sun., General Plan BuihJout \flth Maximum Reside nti11I Altcrn11th'r LTS SUfl,..f Biu lo g!CH I Rl!sou r ces: LTS LT S Rrlnilnntl Rnhlenlial Alternative LTS SU!M LTS Surnmury of Pr-ojut und Project Alternuth·r lmpuct!i Genera l Plan Builtlout Relall und Rt>\'isl'd Prel'ious with Rc5itil'ntial Project Project M11:dmum Alternnllve Re:rildentlal AltcrnPth"e ,1 1'1 NJ NI LTS LT S LTS I.TS LTS LTS LTS LTS NI NI Urcupict..1 / Re-Tennnled Mull Altern:i tln LTS LTS LTS Occ upil'd/ Re-Tenanted Mu ll Altl.'rnnth·e 1'1 LTS LTS NI No Project Altern111h·c NI Nl N I NoProjrct Altl'rnnlin- !\:l NT NI NI Housing Rich Altern:tth·e LTS SUl~·J LTS Housin g Rich Allernath·e NI LTS LTS LTS lmpacL1 lmp:ict DI0-6: 111c projec t (and projtcl ;ilu:malivcs) would nol have a cumub1iv c:ly consider:ihk conlrihuli on lo a sig nilicmt cumul:iti vc biological rcso un.:es imp.:i ~I. lmpnr.l CH.-1: Tl11: projec t (and pruj~c t all cm:itivcs) would nol C3lLS C a substmlial ch:m ge in lhi:significanci: ofa hi s 1orfo Impact C R-2: The project (and Gcnrr.i l Plan Buitdoul with ~,fa ximum Rl!s ident i:il Re tail an d Res idi:ntial AJl~mativo::, and Housing Ri ch Alternative) would not signili cantly impacl mhacologi c .i\ n:soun:c.", human remaiEL'>, or1rib;1I cull ural lmpaclCR-3: 1l1cprojccl (and projec t altc rn :11ivc11) would not dcstrn}' a unique 11alcontologica l rcsoun::c or sile o r uni4uc geological featu re:. lnipnct CR-I: The projec t (illld projxl altcrn:1 1h:c!) would not result in a cumul:u.i vdy cons id~'fabl c conlrihution to a lmparlli siy,nific:111tcumulatil'e culturalrcsour.:es impac t. Jmpnct EN-l : The project (and p.-ojw alternatives) would nol result in a signilicanl environmenlal impac t tlu e 10 the was teful, incfficir..-nt or unnecessary consumption of energy during con structio n orop,.:r:nion. Impact &'\'-2: The proj«:t (and project allcmalh·cs) would nol conflict wi lh or obstruct a state or loca l plans for n:ncwablc- cncrgy or energy ef1icit.1tcy . Im pact EN.J : ll1c projt.'Ct (and project altcma1i vc11) would nol h:,vc a ci msid ~r:ib l,: co ntribution lo a significant cumul ati\·, energy impac1. lm p;ict GEO-l : The project (and projec t allcmativcs) would nol cx po!oe pt.!ople or slru c ture! to subs lantial advcnc effem from ruplure of a known fault, strung S umnmry or Project und Pn,jrrl A ltrrnutlw lmrmcb Genern l Plan lluihJnul Rr h11l 11nd Rl'l'lscd Prc,·lou! with Residential Proj ect Project M111lmum Alll'rn:itlve R ei;lde ntial Alh•rn11tln LTS LTS LTS LTS C ultural Resourcei; LTS LTS LTS LTS LTSIM LTStrvl LTSiM LTS tl\·1 NI NI NI LTS ,'M LTS/M LTSi):f LT S,'11.•f S umntt1ry or Project und Projl'ct Alternuth·t lrnpnct:1 General Plan Duihloul Rl'tall nnd Rr,•isl'd Pn,·lous with Residential Prnjecl Proj ect Mudmum A lt ernative Re!1lde11tl11I Altcrnuth·r lo:nergy LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS I.TS LTS Gt'u lu gy and Solis LTS LTS LT S LTS Occupil'd / Housing Rr-Ten:mted i'\o Projl'cl Rich Mull Alt crnatin A ltrr1rnth·e ,\ltern:iu,·e LTS NI LTS LTS NI LTS LTS NI LTS NI LTS NI LTS.IM Occupied/ Hous ing Re-Tenanted No Project Rich Mull Alll•rnn tin A llerm11 i,·e Alternnth·e LTS NI LTS LT S NI LTS LTS LTS LTS NI I.TS lmpacl,; s.:is mic g.ruund sh3k ing, s.:ismic-rel:11cd ground fai lure (i ncludin g liquefaction), .ind/or land.'l lides. Impncl GE0-2: Th e project (and proj ec t altcmaLi ves) would not result in substanti al soil erosion or loss oftopgoi) or cn:,ue s ubstanli a\ risks to life or pro peny d ue to c:<pa nsiv.:soil. Impact CE0-3: 11,c project (and projce l altcm:itivc!) would not be loc at.:d on a geologic unit or soil thal is unstable , or tha t would become unstable 3!I a result of th e projec t, and potentially result in on-or olf- sil c lancls:lid.:, lateral s11rcadingor su bs id ence. lm pncl GEO-I: TI1 c project (and proj .:c t alternatives) would not be [oca lt'd on soils in cap.:ibh: of adc qualcl y supporting th e use of septi c tanks or alternative was1c \'\'alcr dispu sal i1ystcm~ wh~-n:: sewer., arc nol avai labh: for the dis ponl uf w:isll: waler. lmpncl Gl:::0 -5: lltc project (.1 nd projec t altern ati ve~) would nul l111ve ,1 cumulalin:ly lm pacl:t cmuidcr.1blc contri bution lo a significanl cumul.:uive geo logy l'.l nd soil impact. lmpnct GUG-1: Th e projec t (and Gcnrnl Plan l)ui ldout wi lh ~fa:{im um Res id.:ntial :\ltem,1liw: and Housing Rich Al rcmative) would not gcncralt: curnulali ve ly considerable GHG .:missio11!1 lha t would rcs ull in a significant cum ul ative im pact lo d1ecn'\iron mrnt. Impact G HG -2: 1l1c proj ec t (and Genera l Plan Buildout with ~faximum Res idcn1i al All;..'Tllalivc, Re tail and Reside ntial All;..'fllalivc, and Howin g Rich All crnati vc) would nut .:onfli ct with an .rpplicabh: pl,111 , poli cy, or r~-gulati on adop ted for lhc purp ose of reducing GHG emis sions. Impact IIAZ-1: ll1cpmjctl (and Genera l Plan Dui ld oul with ~·fa :timum Residential, Retai l and Res identi 31 Alternative . and Housing Ric h Ahcmati vc) wo ultl not cr~a lc 3 signi.ficanl hazard to lh c pu bli c or the Sumnmry of Project nnd l'rnjrct Aherm1li\'e lmf)'Jt'l!'I Re,·bt•d Projed LTS LTS Ll'S Prt•,·ious Proj ec t LT S LTS NI LTS General Plan BuihJuut with Mu.dmum Residen tial Alkrnuth·c LTS LTS NI LTl:i Rrl11.llond Rcsidcntial A ltt'r na liVl' LTS I.TS NI LTS Summury of Proje("t 11nd Projl'l:1 Alterm1th•r Imp11cfs Re\·lsc d ProJ ttt LTS,'M LTS LTS.'M Pre\'lo us Project Gen eral Plan Builduut Mn ximum R~ldentlal Alt t.>rn ath·e CHcnhousc Ca.I LTSflvl LTSIM LTS LTS Rrlailand Res idential .Alternnllvt' LTS LTS Hazards und Ha.urdous ~laterla.l~ LTS,~l LTSiM LTS/M Occupied/ Re-Tenanted M ull ,\lternath'e LTS LTS NI LTS Occupied/ Re-Tenanted ~foll , Alt ernatln SU LTS No Project ,\lt crnalh'e N1 NI NI NI No Project Alll•rnuth·e NI NI N I Ho usi ng Ric h All er nalin LTS LTS LTS Hou sing Rich Allt•rnath·e LTS/M LT S LTS/M Impact~ environment through routine tran~porL, use, di sposal , or fon.:sc.:ablc up set oflrn 1..:ird ous malcrials; or cmi l lt:1 1..anlou.1 cm iuion.1 or hazardous materials within one-qu:in cr mil e of an existing or propo,ed sc hoo l. Jmp11ct lL\Z.l: The project {and projec l alh:maliv..:s) is l ocaled on a i;i tc whic h is in clude d ona li sl of h:1 1.1rdous malcri::i ls sit es compiled purs u .. 1111 to Gnvcmmcnt Code S,;ction 65%2.5; however, th .: projcc 1 (and proj ec t all ,::mativt:s) wou ld nut crt:a lc a signifi c::1111 ha zard to th e publi c or lh c cnvironnu:nt as a n=sult. hnp~cl HAZ-3 : Th.: project {an d project altcm..1tivcs) is no t located within an airpon lan d u.~c pbn or ,,,i thin two mile s o f a publi c airpon or puhli c ll~c airport. Impact HAZ-4: 111'.: projec t (an d proj ect alt c:ma ti vc:s) would nol impair imph:mt..'11\:J li on of or physically interfere wi th an :t(lop tcd cmergaicy res ponse plan or emerg..:ncy c:vacuati on pl an. lmpacls lmpn ct HAZ-5: 111c proj~c t (and proj ccr al1 em::ili\·i:s) would not e.1pose peo ple or stru c tun:s lo ::i significant risk of Ion, inj ury , o rdi::Jlh in vohing wi ldland lin:s. Impact J-L\Z-6: Th e projcc l {a nd Ge neral Plan Duild out with ~faximum Rc:si dc:ntial All cmati ve, Retail and Res ide ntial Alternati ve, :11111 Housing Rich All crnativc) would not have a cumulatively consid crahli: co nlribution to a signific,mt cmnul:tti ve h:v..ardo us mate ri als imp.:ict. Im pact HYD-1: Th e projec t (and project ahcm::ith·es) woul d nut ,,;oJate wat crqualil~· 51::a mlanl.~ or waste di!!chargc n.:quin."mcnts, or oth~T\vis~ substanti al ly dc grad ,:: wa ler 11ua lity . Impact HYD-2 : 111 c project (and projec t ::iltc malh·c!) wo uld nol suli!!lanli ally dcplc!c groundwater su pplies or inh:rfcrc subs tantiall y wi th groundw::i rer rec harge. lmpacl HYD-3: Th e project (and proj cc l al tcma.ti ,,·cs) wou]d not suhs1an1i :d ly altt..-r S umnmry of l'rojcct ond Pn,jC'l'I Alte rm1lln lmp:1cl ~ General Pla n lluihluul Reta il a nd Re,·lsrcl Pre1·fous with Res it.l e nli a\ Projttt Proj e ct Maximum Alll'r natlve Residential A lte rnutln~ LT S LTS LTS LTS NJ Nl NI LT S LTS LTS LTS S ummary of Project und ProjC'ci ,\ll('rnuth·C' l m pucts Rel'iSl'd Projec t !\:1 LTS~I LTS LTS LT S Prel·io us Proje<:1 LTS/M Genenl Pion Buil dout with JH11 xlmum Reslde11tla l A lh.'tnMll\'c Nl LTS1~·J Hytlrology ::in d Water Qua l it y LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS Re ta il a nd Re!iil..lcnlia l Alte r na tive NI LTS/JI..I I.TS LTS LTS Occupll'\l f Re-Tenanted M ull Alle rnntln LT S NI LTS O ccu pied / Re-Tenanted Mull A lternnt h·e LTSIM LTS LTS LTS No Project Alt ernnlin- M NI No Project Alt t•r1mth·e NI NI M M M Housing H.lch Allernatlve LTS Nl LTS Housi ng Rich A lte rnnlin LTSflvf LTS LTS I.TS lmpacl'i lh c c.~ist ing drai nagc palh.-m o ftlu: si h: or ar.:a whi ch would r.:,;ull in suh sta ntial erosion, sillation, or Ooo<ling; violalc waler quality S13ndards or W3~h.: disc harge n:<111ircmen1s ; or dt:gradc wa ler qu:tlil y. Im pncl HYD-4: Tht: projt:c l (ornd proj~i.:• alh:ma li ws) would not place housing wit hin a 100-ycar fl ood hazardan:a; im p,;:dc or redire ct ll ood !lows; cxpmc people 01· struc1Urcs 1osignifi ca ntri sk involving fl oodi ng; or be inund:11,:d b}' seichc, tsun:im i, or mudOow. lmpucl HYD-5: 111c project (and projec1 alt cnrn tivc!I) would not have a cumulatively comidcrable conlribu tion 10 a significant cumulali vc hydrology :imhwa tcr qwlil y imp:i ct. lmpnct LU-I : The projcct {and project alt ernative~) wou ld not physically di\idc :i n ..:slabli sh..:d community. lmp:icl 1..U-2: 111,: pm,ii.:i.::I (:i nd General Plan Buildou t witl1 tl.faxim um Resid ential lmracU Alt ... -m:iliv..:, Retail and ll..:s id..:nti:i l Alt.:malivc, and H01uing Ric h Allcrnativc) would nol confli ct wi 1h appli cabk land use plan, policy, or regulatio n oran :igcncy wit h jurisdi clion over U1,: proj..:cl adopted for U1c purpose or avoidi ng or mitigating an em>iroruncmal t:ITcct. Impact LU-J: ·n1c projec t (and projcc1 al1cm:1tivc~) woul d not conflict with appli cable ha bi tat co ns..:rvatio n plan or oatur.1 ! conununily conservation plan . Impact LU -4: The project (and proj..:ct alc cnuli vcs) would not have a cumu lali \"dy i.::orui itlcr:i blc cuntrihulion lo a signifi canl cumul.11i vc land use impacl. lmpncl Ml N-1: The proj ec l (and projett ahcmati\·cs) would not result in 1he loss of availabi lity of :i known mineral resource or locall y-impor1ant min..:rnl resource rcco\'t!f)" sit..:. Impact ~IJ N-2: 11,c proj~cl {:i ml project ahcnu1iv.:s) would nor cont.ri bu1e ro a 8umm11ry or Project nnd Pn1jrct A llc r nutivr lmpnl.°fs Generul Pla n Duildout Rrtalland Rc\·brd Pr c,·lous with RcsldenUa l Project Project Mu:imum Altrrnatlve Re5hlential Altun11tln· LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS Summary of Pr-njcrt 1md Projrrt ,.\ltcr1111t i\'l' l m(Hu:ts General Pla n Buildout Rt'talland Re11isl•d Prc,·lous with Residential Projecl Project l\.luxlmum Alternntlve RC5ldentlal All rrn11lh'c NI ~, NI NI LTS LTS LTS LTS Minera l Reso urces NI NI NJ NI NI NI NI Occupied/ Housing Re-Tenanted No P roj ect H.lc h Mull Altcrn11liH AUernath·e AlternatiH LTS NI LTS LTS NI LTS LTS N I LTS LTS NI LTS Occupied/ Housin g Rl!-Tenanted No Project Rich Mall Altcrm1lin Alter nath·e Alt ernntlve N1 NI LTS NJ LTS NI NI NI NJ NI NI lmpact1 significa11t cumulativ.: mini:ral n.':So un;c ~ itnp3 CI. lmpuct NOl-1: lltc projccl (aml Gc:nml l'lan 13uildoUl with t\faximu.m 1lcsid1.-nt ial , Rclail anti Res idential .-\hernativc, an~ I-l aming Rich All cmatin:) would n o l cx pmc pcn;ons lo or g en era tion of n oii~ levels in c:1:cc~s ofstam!.mls .:s 1Jb]is lml in th.: General Pl3n ~·lunicipa l Codi.:, o r appli cable s1 nndard of other agencies. lmpnct ~OJ-?: TI1c projec t (and General Plan Builtlout with i\•faximnm Rcsi d i.:nl ial, R.:tail and Rcsid<.'fllia1 Allc mali\';::, and Hou.~ing Ri ch Alt~ma1h-c) would n o l c.'iposc persons lo or gcn1:ralion of exct:s.si\•c groundbomc \~bra liun. lmpm:t NOl-3: 111c projec l (:ind Ch:nml Pl:in Bui ldoul with Maximum Rcs idt:ntial , Rct:iil and Ucsidcntial Altcmativc, and Housing Ri ch Ahcmali\'e) w o uld rc~ult in a subslantial pem1anenl increase in ambient lmpaclll ' noise levels in the projcct vicinity ahuvc levels existing without th : projec t. Impact ~01-4: The projec t (and Genm l Pl.in Buildout with Ma.'l:imum Res idi:nl ial, Ro.:lail and RcsidcntiaJ ,\ltcmali\·,:, a .nd Housing Ri ch Altema ti vt) woulJ resull in a su~tantial temporary orp1.Tiodi c incrcm: in arnbicni noi se lcvds in the project vicinity above lc\•o.:\s ex isting without th e project. lrnpnct NOI-5: The project s it,;: is n ot loca h:d wi1hin an ai.rpmt I.ind use plan. wi1 hin lwo mil es ofa pu blic airport o r public use Jirport, or in lhc vicinity of a private airstrip . lmpucl NOl-6: 111c proj~t l (anti General Phm Buildoul with Ma.'l:irnum RcH idcmial All emalive, Retail and ReJidc:ntial Alt.:malivc, and HolL'ling Rich All c nutivc) would result in J cumubci<.·e ly cons iderab le 1);:nnancn t noise level imrcasc at existin g residential land u.~~s. Sunmutr)' of Project ond Prnjl'd Ahtnmth•e lmJ)lu·h Re,·lsl•d Project SU/).1 LT StM SU/M Prr1·ious Project Genera l Pbn Uuih.lout with Mulmum Rahlentlnl Alttrnulin Nulseaud \%ration SU/M SU/?,..( LTSiM LTS/?vl SUfM SU/J\.I Retail a nd Residential Allt>r n:i 1ive SUlM LW M SUI!\.·! Summury nf Project 1md Projut Alt,m11fiYl' lmpnl'ts General Plan Ouildout Rt'lt ilund Re,·lstd Prc\·lous with RcslJcntial Project Project ri.luxlmum Altcrnatlvt> R~ldentlal AllcrnnllH SU/M SU/M SUi1vl SUl)..I ~, NI SU/M sunvt SU/M SU/M Occupi«tl Rt-Tenanted Mull Alte rm1th'e LTS L.TS Sl/ Uccupictl l Re -Ten1111ted l\foll Alter,mtln LTS SU No Proj ect Alttrnnti n i'-1 NI NJ No Project Altrrnati\'I.' N I N1 NI Hou~lnc Hich Altl'rn:ttl,·e SU/1111 LTSIM SU//1.·l Housi ng Rkh Altrrnath·e SU/~·I SU/M l 11q1aclc; Impact POP-I: 111.: project (and projcc l alt cm:itivcs ) ,•.-ould not induce suh§tantial pupulalion growth in llu: an::a. lmpa<'t POP-2: The project (and proj ec t allt:mati \',:ll) would nol tli11 p1Jcc !Uh!lanlial num be rs or exi sting housing or rcsid cnlll , nece~~il;iting the con~1nu:tinn of n..-,i la cc m..:nthousingclscwhcrc. Impact POP-3: ·111..: prnj..:cl (;mtl proj cc l ahematives) would nol ha\'e a cumulati ve ly consitlernble contribution lo J signific.anl cumul:itiYc population and hou.'iing impact. Impacts Im pact PS-1: 111c project (and project alt cm.ari,•c s) would 001 require new or physically altered fir e prot ec tion fo cililics (th e construction of whi ch co uld cause signilh:anl environmental impacls) in order rom:iinl.ainacccpt.Jblcscrvicc ratio s, response limes, or oth er performance: obj ec ti v..:s. Jmpuct PS-.2 : Th e project (Jnd proj ~t alh:matiws) would nol Nquin: new or phys ically altcn:d poli ce protcclion facilitic ~ {th e conslruclion of which could cau.~c sign.ific.101 cmironmcntal impa cts) in ord <.-r lo maintain acc ept.1ble seT\i cc rati o~, rcsp ol1!lc tim e!, or oth er pcrfomian c.: obj ec tive s. Impact PS-3: lhe projcc l (.and Gc n.::ral Plan Builtlout will1 Ma:d mum Res idential , Retail ;ind Rcs id.::ntial Alternative , and Hou.\ing Ri ch ;\ltcmati vc ) would not require new or phy ~icall y alt ered school fa cilities (lh c co nstru ction of whi ch could Sumnm ry or Project nnd l'rojttl A ll,rnulh·c Impacts Re,·lscd ProjKl LTS LTS Prl'\'luus Projed Generul Plan Uuildoul with Mu1imum R~ltlentlal A lh•rnulil'r Populallon and I lousing LTS LTS LTS LTS Rrtallnntl Resit.lenlia l Allerna1lve LTS NI LTS Su111111 11ry or Proje"t nnd Prnjrct Allernutivc lmpucb Revised Project LTS LTS LTS General Plan Uuildout Pre,·lous with Project M11dmum Re!i ldentlal Alternulln Public Sl•n·ices l.TS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS Rttall 11nd Residentia l .. \lternnUve LTS LTS LTS Occupictll Re -Tenanted Mull Alteruath·e LTS NI LTS Occupied/ Re -Tenanted Mull Alt ernntln LTS LTS No Project Alkrnali\'l• NI Nl NI No Project AIIL'l"llllti\'e NI NI Housing Rich Altern:1tln LTS LTS Housing Rich ,\ll ernatl,·e LTS LTS LTS Impact.~ ca w,..: signifi cant cnvimnm",11al impacl~) in ord e r to maintain accc111Jbl.: scnicc ra1i os, ~Jm n.~c tim es, or olh.:r pi:rf01ll13m:c obj..:c li \'cs. lrn 1m c t PS-4: 111c project (and proj ect a!lcnutivcs) would n o 11rquire new or physi c all y :i hcrcd libr.uy faci1i ria (the co n!1truc1ion or which could c ause signi li canl .:nvimnmcntalimpac ls) in nrdcr 10 ruain1ain acccpul,lc s~ivi cc rJtios, respo nse time s, or other pcrrornM m:e objccti \'CS. lmp11 c l PS-5: Th.: projetl (and Ge neral Plan Buildout wi th Ma:<i mum lksid~ti:il, Re tail aml Rcsidcolial Al1ema1in:, and Hous ing Rid1 Allcmati,·c) would no l require new or physically altered pa rk fac ilities (lhc conslruc li on o f whic h could ca\L'IC significant environmental imp.:1 cts ) in order 10 rnainlain acci.:11tab lc service ratio.~, res poll.'l e tim es, or other pi:rConn.t nce ohjecti v.:s. lm p.icts Jmp ncl PS-6 : The projc,t (.111d projec t ilhcmath·ts) would n ot ruult in §ig nificant cu mula1i vc imp:ict5 to publi c scni ces. lmpnct RE C-I: The projec t (and projccl al 1em :i 1i vc~) would no l m ull in sub.<1tan1ial physic al deterioration of rec t'cational faci lilic~. Impac t REC -1: Th e proposed op en space unde r th 1.1 pmjt:c l (and Gcnc ral l'l an Bui ld out l"ltith Ma.'\imum Rcsid~1uial Alt emalivc, Rclail and R~si tlc:ntia l ,\llcmative, ;ind Housing Ric h All cm ati\'c) would not rcs ult in an adl'crse phys ic al df.:c l on the ,m vi mnm.:nl. lmpuc l RE C.J: The projec l and projec l al 1.:m.a 1ivcswouldnoln.:sul1 in 1igniric:a nt cu mul.-iti \'.: recreati on impa c l:ii. Impact l UN-1: UmJcr ~xi s Ii 11!1 wi lh pmj.:cl con di 1ions,1he projec l (md Genr:ral Plan Dui ldoul with Maximum Re s idmli al. Re t:ail Sumnmry ofl'rojecr 11nd Pn1j l't't Alrl'rnu ll,·l' lmpnct1 Rl',·lst>d Project LT S LTS Prt>,·lous Proj e ct I.TS LTS Generul Plan Buihlnul with t,.faxlmum Re!!ldentinl A ltcrnnliH LTS LTS Rr t11il nnd Residl!nlial AlternatlH LTS LTS Summery of Project und Projl'l't Altl'rm1fin l mpucts General Pinn Buihluut Rr l a iland Re ,•is ed Prn·ious \Vlth Residential Project Project Muxlmum Alt ernnl[\'e Reslde ntla l A ltcrnutiH LTS LTS LTS LTS Rrcrc111ion LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LT S LTS LTS LTS I.TS LTS LTS Tran~purt;1tiu11 su.r~ .. , SU/M SU/M SU/M Occupi('(]/ Re-Tena nted No Project ri.tul l Alternntin Aherna tln LTS NI r,;1 Ni Oi:cupicdl Re-Tenanted No Project Mull Alll'rnntin Alternntln LTS NJ LTS NI ~~ NI !\l NI SU NI Hous ing Rich Alte rnnth·e LTS LTS Housing Rich Alte rnatt,·e LTS LTS I.TS LTS SUit\·! lmpacl~ am.I Rc$idcnti3.l Alt .. mativ.::, and Housing Rh::h Allcmati vc) would co nfli ct with an ap pli ca hh: plan, ordinance, Of" po licy utablishin g m.::asurc s or cff.:cli\·.::ncss for thc performance or th e circulation sy,1em; and conflict with an appli ca ble co ngcuion llt3nagc ment program . including stand.ird, C$tal:ilishc<l ford cs ig11:11cd maili or highways. Jmpnct TRN-2: Undt!r b3 ckground wi lh proje cl condi tions. th.: proj ec t (3nd projec 1 ahemalivcs) wouJd confli ct with :m applicahlc plan. ordinance, or poli cy establi shin g mcasurc s orcffccti,;cnc~~ for tile performance or the circulalion sys h:m ; and cunOic t \\ith an appli cable congC!ltiun mana geme nt progr.1111, including stand.ird.5 cstahlished fo r d.:signat ed roatl.'i or hi ghW:J)'B . lmpucl T~-J: Proj eel .1nd prnjcct .t11.::rn.:1li\'c conslructi on·rcla1 edtraffic wo uld not conflicl wi th an applii:abl .: 11lan, or<li nama:, or poli cy C!l lahlishing mea sun:s lmpacL, or .::ffcctivcn'-":!LS for 1hc pcrfom13nce or the: ci rcu l.:ition s}·s t.:m . Impact TRN4: TI,c projec t (and projccl ll.1cnuti \'cs) would not result in a change in air trallic pall cm s that n:sulli in s ubstanti.:il safety ri sks. Impact TRN-5: l11c proj ec t (and proj ect altc rn.3.tivcs) would not substanli:illy incrca.~~ ha1.:mls due to :i dcsi gn fe atures (e.g., sharp curv1!s or d:ingcrous inlersec ti ons) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment); :ind would nor result in inadequ.il c emc rgt:nc)' acc ess. lmpuct TR~.6: 11,c Hou,i ng Ri c h :\il\.TIJativc wo uld conflict wilh atloph:d poli cies, plans, or pmgr3ms n:gJrdifl!! publi c tr:msit, bicycle , or pc:dutrian fa cilitksorolhcm·ise dc crc as.;th c pc:rfom1an.:c of ufcry or such fa ciliti es. Impact T~.7: The projec t {and Genera l Plan Uuild out with Maximum Resid ential Altcrn~live, RelJil and Res idcnlial Ah1.T1111livc, :ind HolL,ing Rich AII LTI1 ath·c) Sumnmry ofl'rojcct nnd l'n,jert A ltcrnuth·e Impucts Re,·lsl'tl Projed SUiM LTS Prl·\·lou, Project SU/~·I LTS Ge neral Plan BullJuul Mu1lnrnm Re11ldential Altcrnulin !i V/M LfS Retail 11nd Rl•s idenlial Altt>rnath·e SU/M LTS Smnmury of Project und Pmjecc Alternutin lmpucts Gent ral Plan lluiltlo ul Relai1 1md Rc11i sl'd Prri·iou s with l\l111lmum Residential Project Project Altenmti11e Re!ildcntlal Altrrn11th'e NI NI NI NI I.TS LTS I.TS 1.:rs LTS L.TS LTS LTS SU/M Sli/M Sll/~I Uccupiell/ Re -Tenanted Mull Ahcrnatl\"e SU LTS O ccupied/ Re-Tenanted t\foll AlternnUn NI I .. TS SU No Project Alll'rnntin- NI NI No Pr oject Allt•rnulin NI NI Nl NI Housing Rich Altern:1th·e SU/~·f LTS Housing Rich Alternath·e NI LTS SUiM SU/1·1 lmpacl~ woul d n.:su lL in a cumul ati vely conside ra ble contributio n to a signifi c:mt cunm1 ati\'c tram;port.1tion impact. Impact UTL-1: 1111: projccl (J ntl projec t allt:ma li w s) woul d not exceed waslc\Ya lcr lreahm:nt n.:q ui n.,ncnlli or th e applicJhlc R..:g ion.11 Wllcr Quali ty Concro\ BoJrd. Impact lJrL-2: 111c project (.1 ntl G~nc ral Pl.1 11 Dui ld ou t with Maximum Residen ti al, Re tail .1nd Reitid<.-nti.11 Alternative, and Ho using Ri ch Allclll.ltivc) would require impro\'cmenls to 1111: exis tin g sewer J}'J l<.-m , howe v..::r, the constru.:ti on of the improvement~ woul d not c .1115( ,iguilicanl 0::111.·imnmcntal effects. lmpu ct lrfL-J : 1111: 1,·as tewiller lrc:Jl mt:nl providcr {R WF) would h.:wc ildcquilt~ ca p,1e i1y to serve tho:: projecl (~nd prnje c l al11m1.1tivc !I) demand in addi1ion to the provillcr'!l .:xisting comm itmco 111. Impact lJl'L-4: The project (:ind pruji:..:t altcniativcs) would nol requi re lh c · lmpa(L~ con,tru ction of ni:w storm wale r dr.rinagt: facil iti es or expansion of exisling fa d litics. Impact UTL-5: 'Ille project (:ind proj ect .tll ematives) wo uld h.1vc sufficient Walc:r supply avail .ibl,,: to ,erve 1hi: prnjccl fro m existing enl itlcmenl!l and resourct:s. Impact lffL-6: l11e projei;t (ant.I project al1 cmativc11) would he: served lly a IJndfill with suffi cit.-nt pennilh:d capacity lo .1cc ommoda1e 1hc projci.:fs solid W.l!tc dispO!'lal and would co mpl y wilh. a pp licable sla tutcs and rcgul at in~s relat,:d 10 solid Wlltt:. lmpuc l liTL-1; ·111epmjcct (an d prujcc t allcmall\'es) would not result in significant cumul at ive imp acL~ to uliliti .:s anti service 5ys 1c ms. Impact GR0-1; The pmjccl (anti project allemallvcs) would not fo ster or s 1.imulatc significant economic or popul;uio n grot>.:th in 1hi.: surrountling cnvinmment. Sumnmry o f l'rojecl 11nd Pn1j el'f Alr e rn11 th·r lmpud.1 Rl'1·15cd Proj rc l LTS LTS fM LTS LTS Prc ,·ious Proj ect General Pla n ·Jlui ld out with Maximum ReJide ntlal Altl'rnutln• Ulllillcs an d Scn·Jce Systt'm LTS LTS LTS/M LTS/M LTS LTS LTS LTS Retailnnd Rl'sidl'ntial Alt t•r natll·e LTS LTSfl,.I LTS LTS Summury of PrnjcC"t und Projrd A llernulin• lm()l.lrb Rl','ised Project LT S LTS LTS LTS Pre,·iou Proj ect LTS LTS I.TS Gemm1 I Plnu Buildnut with l\lnlmum R~ldentlal A1ternulh'l' LTS LTS LTS Grov.1h Inducing Imp:i.cl'I LTS LTS Rrtniland Rl'si d entia l Alter n atiw LTS l.TS LTS LTS Orcuph.'t.1 1 R e-Tenante-d Mu ll ,\ltcrnntl\'e LTS LTS LTS LTS Urcu piro/ No Proj ect Alt crnnlin NI NI NI NI Re-Te na nt ed No Project f\.foll Altr rnnth·e Alt rrnntl\'C LTS NI LTS NI LTS NI NI Housing R ich Altern:1tl1·e LTS Cl'Sftl l LTS LTS Hou sin g Rich Alleruatil'e LTS LTS LTS LTS Im pact.<; ~k cls Proj.:ct Objectives? Sumnmry or Projrct nnd Pn1jrt't Altern ulive lmp1icb R e\·lscd Projec t P r c\·ious Projttt G f11er11 IPla11 Bu ilt.lout Rclall 1111d with Rcsidential !!:~!:~~l:I Alcernatlve Alll'rn utln· Yes Occuph.•t.1 1 Re-T en:rnted Nu Project Mull Alt l'rOlllin Al ternatl\"e No Houslni:: Rich Altenmth·e Yos I Noles: SU• signifi c:mt and unavuidahlc im11act ; SUtil = significanl and una voida b k impact wilh miti galion-incorporalc<l ; LTSIJl.•I = less llian signifi cant impact wi 1h miligafion incorpor.itcd; L TS = less U1an signi fi cant impact; Nl :a ~o impa.:I Do lt! 1.: . ....:1 indicalc being .:nviromncnlall y s uperior lo th~ propo!-c d J>tt!i..:ct. Recommendations -Past Actions • Environmental Review Committee (ERC) • Certification of the EIR on August 31, 2018 with a 5-0 vote • Planning Commission (PC) • Certification of the EIR, adoption of CEOA findings, a statement of overriding considerations, mitigation measures and conditions of approval into the project and a Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program on September 4, 2018 with a 5-0 vote. Questions? \/al/co Spec,f,c Pion Ell~