CC 02-18-75
ee
ee
r
¡
,.
I,
\
,-
f
(
an OF QJPEKUJlO, STATE or CALllOlJIIA
1Ø3OO Torre Avenue, Cupe1."CiDo, California 95014
1'e1ephone: 252-4505
HIN11rES œ tBZ ....... - IIŒIDG OF THE em COUIICIL
DLD (It ft--a.. 18, 1975. D DB CXI\JHCIL alAHBD, crn BALL
~&IU..,. CALIIOIR1A
saurn TO THE FLAG
llø:yor Sparks ~alled the ~1A. to order at 1 :30 p... with the
Salute to the Pla¡,
IOU CALL
Counc. present: Frolich (8:45), Jackson, Meyers, JI~llis,
Mayor Sparu
CoImc. absent: Jlone
5~aff present:
City Haaaaer Quinlan
Director of Administrative Services Ryder
Assis~aa~ City A~torney Kl1ian
Director of Planning and De.elopmen: Sisk
Director of Public Works Viskovich
Director of Parks and Recreation Butler
OL\L COMMl:~¡CATlONS
I. 1'.:>ne
2. Submitted req.....ts to address the Council.
(a) None
3. Recognition by Hayor of audience requests.
(a) None
PUBLIC HEARI1'CS
4. Public hearioa relating to the noise assessnent study
of McClellan Square. (continued from meeting of
January 20, 1975)
CC-25l
Paae 1
CC-251
Paae 2
Noise Asses..
study "ded to
Q( pe~ina
projec~s list
ee
..
MINUTES OF THE FEBIØAJrY l8, 1975 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Hana¡er referred to his report of February l4" 1975, liviDS
the nsults of the _~1ng with the property owners. It was proposed
that tlw vall he raiaed SCIIIMI 4.5'. The present wall cannot support
the addit100sl heiaIat. but an independent structure could be inetslled
00 pol.. IIdjaceat to the exist iDS vall ~ 5_ of the prope1."ty ofmers
bave indl::ated thac they vould p1."8fer to have the probl.. solved in
sœe otber _r. Secondly, the City does not at the present tt.e
bave the authority to require allevlation of this problem. 50_
operatiooal cbaaps have been introduced, SAGES is l18king a nois.
study aDd Publle Safety Comalssion is revlevina the probl...
Since the1.". _re DO c~ts f1."oa the audience, i~ was"1IIOvcd by
Counc. Heye1."s, HCOllded by Counc. Nellis to close the public hearing.
Motion carried, 4-0
Moved by Counc. Meyers. seconded by Counc. Jackson to remove the
noise assessment study of McClellan Square from the agenda and ~o
add it to the City Hana1er's list of pendina projec~s,
Motion carried, 4-0
5. Public hearing on application 6-EIR-74 of the proposed Rancho
Deep Cliff project, a sixty-one unit residential cluster development.
Said project contains approximately 17.9 acres and is located
adjacent to and eastèrly of Stevens Canyon Road approximately
2-0 feet southerly of Riverside Drive.
6. Application 28-Z-74 of W. J. Herman (Kester Property): Rezoning
approxbaately 2.7 acres from Rl-7.5 (Residential, single-family,
7,500 sq. ft. pe1." dwelling unit) Zone; and 15.2 acres from A-ua
(Agricultural/lecrea~ional) Zone; to P (Planned Development with
residential cluster. 61 units maximum intent) Zone. Sald property
is locat,d adjacent to and easterly of Stevens Canyon Road approxi-
mately 200 feet southerly of Riverside Drive. Recommended for approval,
14.(c) Application 2-U-75 of W. J. Herman (Kester Property): Use
Perait to allow construction of a maximum of 61-unit cluster
developaeDt on 11.9 acres located adjacent to and easterly of
Stevens Canyon Road approximately 200 feet southerly of Riverside
Drive. lecoamended for approval,
The above three it..s were introduced by the City Clerk at one time,
since they concern the same property and the same proposal.
~'
1!'
~' '.
11,
.'"
~
},
ee
ee
HINUTES OF TIlE FEJlIIØdI 18, 1975 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The Plllllninl DlreceØr 8Ùted that the matte1."S befo1."e tbaClty
Council on tbia }n!J~ ac this tille are the EIR. e<""lÍt...,.UOD
of'the Pllll8iDa ,~.i..1OD rec_daUon of chllllP 01.-4.. aød
the use pemit:~ ~àffb:. aeolol1 ànd the question of.,1IOn
precise a1."alliDl p~ for the property COM at us. pemit .....
Be then revl.... the CODceptual pIau posted on the buU_4.. board.
The Plannina D1reetor said then ha been concern by __ of the
nsldents in the area reprdlng earess and Il1pai~t of v1ev
frOlD their boaes. Be furthe1." stated that a problem arose the
day of this _etiDc reca1."dlng the elevation of one of the hcaes
along Rive1."side Dri"e. It Involved transposition of _orements
aade in the field. The streets within the project are pri"ate,
24' wide with no parkina allowed on the street. The fiDdings will
have to be made as to fees or dedication of land fo1." pa1."ks.
Counc. Jackson said he bad a problem with this proposal in that it
is not in keeping with the 1964 General Plan.
Counc. Nellis noted that an application on thls property came
before the City same two years ago and at that time it-was decided
this property was being studied. She has studied this property
on both the Planning Commission and City Council level.
The slope density formula is to be considered for maxl~
dens ity. .
I
I
I
,
I
I
There was ~~~ ~iscussion about the possibility of provision for
parking of campers. ~tc.
Mr. Geoffrey
representing
questions.
II. Swett, P.O. Box 1l46, Los Altos, Ca. 94022.
Enviros Consulting Firm, offered to answer any
Mayor Sparks asked If this environmental impact report address~s
the condition of health as it relates to the BUlCk Norred stables;
e.g., flies, smells, etc. Mr. Swett said that vertically. it is
far enough away that this should not be a problem. The Planning
Director added that the stable's use permit conditions take care
of these problems.
Counc. Nellls commented that the ElR was very well done.
Mr. W. J. Kerman, developer, answered Coune. Meyera that they can
change the contou1."S without any major problems. Along Riverside
Drive, he will alleviate the problem of view by simply aaving the
house down the hill soaewhat.
Hr. Herman answered Counc. Jackson that Deep Cliffe has proposed
a property exchaaae to take care of the problem of the na1."rOW
fai",ay.
cc-251
Pace 3
· ~.'-'
..-
:.,?;.
28-Z-14
apprc-.d
2-U-14
app rovd
w/conciic1-ocs
Ord. 678
First Jleadln&
ee
..
MINUTES OF THE mllUMY 18, 1915 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Hayor Sparks aked for c ·ts frOll the audleoce oa -aea4a it... 5,
6. ad l4 (e). nen __ .e.
'" ", ',j,.." ':,~. >
Hr. 8eraa _ed Co_~.lIeyers that there vi11 be __a to the
s.¡_le questiaDa ,rior cftteDtatlve up t1ae.
Moved by COUDC. Key81."S, Meoadoed by Counc. Nellis to eloH the publ1e
bearinas,
Motion carried, 4-0
Moved by COlØ\e. Rellis, seconded by Counc. Meyers to certify the
enviro......ntal 1JIIpact report 6-EIR-74 to be complete.
Motlon carried, 4-0
Moved by Counc. Nellis, seconded by Counc. Meyers to approve ópplication
28-Z-14.
Motion carried, 3-l
Lounc. Jackson clarified hls dissenting ·vote, saying he believes this
to be ~ good proposal bcc that we should wait the 45 days for the Hlllside
Element of the General Plan.
Moved by C<Junc. Nellis, secondcd by Counc. Meyers to appro"e appl ication
2-U-14 in accordance wich Planning Commission Resolution No. 1393 with
the change to condition 17 (b) amended to read 431 feet.
Motion carried, 3-l
Counc. Jackson dissenting
(a) First Reading of Ordinance No. 618: "An Ordinance of the City of
Cupertino Amending Section I of Ordlnance No.2 by Rezoning
Approximately 2.7 Acres from Rl-7.5 (Residential, Single-Family,
7",500 Sq. Ft. Per J),IeUing Unit) Zone and 15.2 Acres from A-ua
(Agricultural/Recreational) to P (Planned Developmenc wlth Resi-
dential Cluscer, 61 units Maximum Intent) Zone: Located adjacent
to and Easterly of Scevens Canyon_Road Approximately 200 Feet
Southerly of Riverside Drive." - read by the City Clerk.
Moved by COUDC. Heyers. seconded by Counc. Nellis to have Ordinance 618
read by title only, and cbe Clerk's reading shall conscicute the
Fi rst Readina.
Koti~n carried, q-O
..
ee
HINUrES OF THE FEBJIIAKY la. 1975 CITY CO~CIL MEETINC
IIøved by Counc. Heyen. HC"J"'" .., Coune, Nel11s to elect to take
fees in lieu of 1II1I4I for pøk "'1eatlon.
.11:'..... carried, 4-0
IIoved by Coune, Nellie. Hn'....... 111 Counc, Meyers to direct the
staff to make a IIOtice_ of ~ftatlon with the County that ,::...
Environmental Iapsct J.eport is eo.plete.
lID£ion car1."ied, 4-0
Mayor Spsrks called a rece.. at 8:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened
at 8:44 p.lI.
7, Public hearina on Application 5-EIR-74 of the proposed
De Anza Racquet Club aÐ4 De Anza Village Green project,
which project consists of approximately 13 acres located
at the northwest COrDer of the intersection of Stelling
Road and Stevens Creek Blvd. The proposal 1s to construct
a cOllllDØrcial racquet club consisting of a clubhouse, res-
taurant, pro shop, Ol~ic swimming pool, eighteen tennis
courts and resldential custer development containina 64 units
8. Application 25-Z-14 of De Anza Racquet Club and Village Green
(Don O. Bandley and Equity Development Company): Rezoning
l3.2+ acres from P (Planned Development with Gene1."al Cocmerci I
Inteñt) Zone: to P (PJan~ed Development with Residential/
Recreational and Incidental Commercial Activities Intent)
Zone. Said prope1."ty is located at the northwest corner of
the intersection of Stelling Road and Stevens Creek Llvd.
Recommended for denial. Appealed by Equity Development
Company, Inc" and Don O. Bandley.
9. Application 27-U-74 of De Anza Racquet Club and Village Green
(Don O. Bandley and ¿quity Development Company): Use Permit
to allow construction of a commercial racquet club ccnsisting
of a clubhouse, restaurant, pro shop, Olympic swlmaing pool,
and eighteen tennis courts. Said property is located at the
northwest corner of the intersection of Stelllng Road and
Stevens Creek Blvd. Kecazmended for denial. Appeal by
Equity DevelopDeDt Coapany, Inc., and Don O. Bandley.
lO. Application 31-U-14 of De Anza Racquet Club and Village Green
(Don O. Handley and Equity Devclopment Company) ~ Use Permit
to allow construction of a residential cluster development
containing sixty-four units. Said property is locatrd at the
northwest corner of the inte1."sectlon of Stelling Road and
Stevens Creek Blvd. ~nded for denial. Appealed by
Equity D~velopaent Cnapany, Inc., and Don O. ßandley.
---'-
CC-251
Pai:!' 5
<
'I
,
i
~
1
,
III\ filed VlthJ
the Countyi
Pees instead
of park
dedleation
ee
Ie
INurES OF THE FEllIIJARY l8, 1915 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4 (b) Appl1cat1oD 26-TK-14 of De ADza Racquet Club ...i Village Grean
(DoD;.O'; s.4ley aad Equity Developeeat CoapaD1): Tentative Hap
:;~d"· 13.2+ acru into two puc:eb. Said property 18
. "~',_ the nõrtbvut corner of tbe !nter..ctl00 of Stellina
10000;;·...StÞeø. Cr..k Blvd. Rec Mðed for denial. Appealed
by I~i DÌwelopaent CoapaD1, Ine., _d Don O. Bandley.
.'.'"
Di1."ectœ:'ofAlla1n1strative Seniees innoduced the above 5 It_
deallna with tile _ property,
ExhlblU A, ., C. D. B and r "1."e placed 00 the bulletin board.
Pl_tna Diractor reviewed the land use bsue here'that has been
p1."evloual1 resolved by the Pl_ina eo-tssioo and City Council,
Counc. Frol1ch arrived at the _et1na at this point.
The Plannina Director read into the record the Plannina Commission's
findings in Resolution No. l387.
The Assistant Clty Attorney advised that if there are material chanaea
in the plan frOll what was presented to the Plannina Coamission, it has
been the policy of the City Council tð return the proposal to that body
for review prior to Council action on it. However, if the changes are
consldered .inor, the City Council could proceed with their review and
dec is Ion .
Counc. Nellis sald she had no quarrel with the zonina, per see The
Plannina Director advised that in this case, the plan is tied to the
zoning.
Attorney Keith P1."itchard, 525 W, Remington, Sunnyvale, stated he w»s
representina both applicants in this .atter. He said they have not
deviated substantially fro. the plans presented to the Planning Commission.
The unusual probl.. here is that this property is contiauous to the
Memorial Park and across the street from De Anza Colleae. Secondly, the
Plonnina Comaission deterained this shoulù be low to DOderate income
housina. Thirdly, the City Council determined there were certain
policies attached to this property in re¡ard to an overall plan for
developaent of the property. There are two developers involved here.
From an econo.tcal standpoint, it is alMOst impossible to finance
condominiums in this County at the present t~e. The recommendations
made by the Planning staff are all acceptable to both applicants.
Mr. Pritchard said at the Planning Commission meetlng 3 nuaber of
questions were raiaed after the public hearing WaS closed so the
applicant was unable to respond.
Mr. Pritchard said that once a~proval is granted, there will be an
application for dlvlslon of the property. Although there will be
coordination of landscaping, there can't be any interplay between the
two properties.
¡
{:~'.
,.
,
I
¡
t
¡
i
I
I
f
,
,
I
ee
ee
ImmrES OF THE p...uay l8, 1975 CITY COUNCIL HEE'fDlG
Mr. Prltchud saiII they reco¡nJ.ze tbe fact the: then will be
1apac:t of noise ...·~f&ht. frOll tbe _pl:itbeater ~ the Memorial
Park.
Hayor Sparks as" ..,. the tennis courts couldn't be aoved over
and act as a . buff_ '&etween tbe park and the~. Hr. Pritchard
said this woulcl·~e tbe dislocation of tbe club house, etc.
He added tbat the7 v11l landscape as much as i. practical.
Landscape architect Da"id Boos, 30 A Bryant Street. Palo Alto,
went over the Ifll....-:.p- plan. The tennis court. will be slightly
depressed - s_ 3 feet. with a c<mtour berm with a variety of
t1."ees and shrubs. Tbe1."e wUl be a 12' masonry wall between the
tennis courts aad redd2Dt1al units. Generally, there will be a
20' vide space for heavy plantings along the perilaeter.
Discussion tU1."ned to the residential units. Each wll1 have a doub e
garage with electronic eye door openers. There will be 32 addi-
tional guest parklng spaces -- chis is in addition to the 3.5
park:~g ratio. The eaphasis will be on the market for couples
wit~~ut children. There will be private, meandering walks through
the units, through the mounds and trees and shru'~ery and meadows
to :~e pool area. A wall system surrounds the development.
The tennis courts are i~dividually lighted.
In .:ewing the elevations, Counc. Meyers noted the similarity of
these units to those existing by Genco, which are generally quite
unattractive. Hr. fritchard said this develop~ent will be quite
dlffe:eut from those apartments. For one thing, there will be a
considerable amount of landscaping. -
Ceun:. Jackson referred to item 13 on page 43 regarding privacy.
The developer said this will be solved by flip-floppinS of some
the un:ts.
The Planning Director said the Planning Co""",ission felt there migh
be s~e problem of intrusion of the parking area.
The ~irector of Public ~orks ans~ered Counc. Nellis that the reas~
the City is asking for Anton Wa,' is for patroling and in order to
make Stevens Creek Blvd. .intersection function better.
The Planning Director learned from the police department that one
of the problems with our parks is that they are surrounded for the
most part with rear yards rather than with a street.
Counc. Nellis noted on the plans that the developer has not com-
plied with the alniaua 20' sethack on Anton Way and Alves Drive.
e<;-2,5l
P"Ie 7
'"
·~ ,: ^ -
{,
"
.
Ie
'I
KIKUrES OF THE FEBRlJAID' 18. 1915 cm COUNCiL HEETIIIG
Ik. . Pritchard said the DOf;Ita. eaanatiDa frGa the _phitbeater vith ..
rock _cut will ~. "tt~tbe W3' dOllD here to City Ba11. Be
__red llayor sparucJllii'Ü8 tennis courts ad 64 UDitsare øeulaIJ
froa _ econollie.t~. The density Is 9.98 øcJ ba1141aa cover...
is 31.61. The Counel1___",:iDdicated there could be up to 16 units
per aeø here. These ao1U will 1."\111 $40 to $50.000. With 18 teDDie
courts, the aeabership v1U be l800,
Mayor ~ I8rks asked for .
,.ts frOlll the audience,
ífary CoDzalea, l0461 Stokes, Cupertino, asked how this proposal coapares
to other kinds of uses.. far as traffic is concerned. As to t.mn!a
tournaaeats, she woodered bow many there would be per tear and how IUDY
people are I'!1ticipated .JOt were they will pult, Also, she would lik.
to make sure we don't ereate a tunnel effect along Slevens Creek Blvd.
3he would like to avoid strip commercial. She observed that this is
aoing to be an expensive club and wondered where the members will be
comlna frOG,
The Director of Public Works said this pr~posal gene1."ates less traffic
than all residential would.
The de,·eloper said this is not a "Billie Jean King type" tournament,
It will only involve about 100 spectat~r~ about o~ce a year.
Moved "y Counc. Nellis, seconded by Count. Meyers to close the public
heari".;.
Motion carried, 5-0
Counc. ~eyers said he has no objectio"s to the overall uses; however, he
had s~e questions about the residential. Perhaps the land value is
overpri~e~ if It demands this high a density. He would like to see
around 6 units per acre here.
Counc. J~~kson said he could see no problem with the tennis courts.
The resIdential is only ~ adjunct herc. As long as the traffic prohl~m
is no ~reater than residential, it ~ould appear to have no special pro~lem.
Counc. 'iellis noted that the Cit~· Urst ",:mted thl,; land for an extensiun
of Ke~rial Park; however, the City could not purchase it for economic
reasons. She wO'Jld like to see the devdopment of this land relate to
Memorial Park.
<>"
f(
..
..
JOlIUTE'> or rtΠFEBRUARY la. 1975 CITY COUIICIL IlEEtING
Coaac. lrolich said be'Jt~,tJda c:oncept. Be.... no probl_
w1t:h the mat ponlcD.~.t~.,~~.3i,dens1t1 is DOt really that b8ð.
_ ... redesip is neces.~?~, }'ibe aoae sense of o~ space.
~.._r.~>-~:"t~, ~~ ,"
.;f";;:' ',',e
Ia the ..-t this is ret~.to the P1SIIDiø¡ C.-i-don, the
deva10per asked 1£ the c-.... could be split and we could ¡no-
_d with t!>e tennis courts ¡IOrtion of the plan. It waa the
_e_ :of the City eo--~ that this plan neecla 1."edesign and
that It sbculd be referrea '-ck to the Plsnnfna Commission.
Moved by ~.=c. Nellis. ._-"-4 by Counc. Jackson to certify
tbe EnYir<:OloOntal tapact "port as being cocplete, and to instruc!:
tbe staff :~ file it vltb the County.
ØDcion ca1."1."ied, 5-0
Moved by ';-."':. Meyers, secoaded by Counc. Jackson to refer
applica:::ci 2~-Z-74, 17~74. 31-U-74 and ló-TM-14 back to the
Planning :_~c:ssion wltn the recOIIIIendati0n that the developer
re-eval~~:~ :~e design based on Council c~~ents. The concept
of the ,"':_:t was approved. Further, tr.ese a?plications are to
be reta'~_·; .." the Council aa....da a8 being open under public
hearing. .
MOtion carrieè, 5-0
Mayor SFõ~'> :~lled a recess at 10:58 p.=. The meeting reconvened
at 11 :07
13. Re.::_::~n No. 3849: "A Resolution ~f the City Council of
the : .:.. ~f Cupertino to Change Str~"t :;~= of a Portion of
Imrt:": Avenue Nort~.rly of Bubb R~~¿ to Results Way as
Pr.~_;," in Section 5026 of the Streets and Highways Cede,
Sta:, :: California."
Moved b~- : :".::. Nell is, secoaded by Counc. Jac,"son to adopt
Re80Iuti~~ ~,. 3B49.
MOtlon carried, 5-0
CC-25l
Page 9
5-EIR-14
certified
25-Z-74
17-U-74
31-U-74 [.
26-nl-74
returned t ('
Planning Co:.¡~.
Res. 3849
adopted
._--~
C'.C- 2Sl
I'..e lO
>;
{
,
i
,
38-Z-74
Approvetl
te
..
HINUTES OF THE FDJUAaY 18, 1975 CITY COOHCIL MEETING
..~ .
11. AppUcatioa ~~.,of Sob1."8to-leq-lusso: JIazo1I1ns 4+ ICres
fraa P ("..~:@8...';~ I..... . ~t witb Ceaeral c-rc1al Intent) Zone
to P"(P1D~è~ ~~t with IadUst1."lal Use Intent) ZoDe.
Said p1."cpert,- ~'-~...,. at the southeat corner of the Interseetion
of Beardoa Drl""""Yalley Gr_" Ddve. Rec~ed for apP1."oval.
CoUIII:. .Jac:ksoa ~. l1ke . ¡GOd edteria or written "policy statement
on how to achieve the trip end standard here,
Kay01." Sparks askeel for e_ts frOll the audlence. There were none,
Moved by Counc. Nellis, seconded by Counc. Heyers to close the publie
hearina·
Motion car1."ied, 5-0
Moved by Co~nc. Meyers, seconded by Counc. Nellis to reopen the public
hearin¡.
Motion carried, 5-0
~Ir. John S",'orat3, 2175 ~ddleficld, Palo Alto, said he has been building
these type~ of buildings since 1968. This is his tenth pr?ject and this
is the f¡r~: time he objects to onc of the conditions. He feëlq
strongly t~at they necd the loading dock on the south side behind
building:'. The theory is that the Mari.anl property ",ay be developed
residentidlly. Due to land costs, it is a very remotc possibility that
it will Ò~ Jeveloped residentially. He prescnted a copy of the landscape
plan that cJÙls for 5 feet of perirn~tcr landscaping.
The City Manager said that 1."atber fhan the 6' masonry wall requirement
in Conditl.3 19, it should addrcs$ the sound wall.
Moved by Counc. Meyers, seconded by Counc. Jackson to close the public
headna·
Motion carrled, 5-0
Moved by Counc. Meyers, seconded by ~ounc. Nellis to approve 38-Z-14
with the conditions in accordance wLth Planning Commission Resolution 1384
with the exception that Condition E' shall rcfer to a common sound wall,
and Condition 22 shall be eUminat.·d.
ee
..
~
KINUTES Of THE FEBRUARY ld, 1975 CITY COUNCIL MEETUIG
!lotion was .-ucIed by Co_e. .Jac:ltsoa. seConded by Coon·e. Meyers
to iaelude a Dew Condition 22: To prCl91de tbat gperatioa of the
fK111t1es ~d be eoødUCCeð ia auch a UllD8r that DO 8Øre than
SOl of tbe eIIp10JeU 1IOu1cI be releaHd durina the peak hour.
& "--at CS1'1."led, 5-0
..toa cS1'1."led, s-o
IIoftd by Counc. !leyen, .-.-Ied by Couac. Rellb to approve
28-~74 in accørclaace with n_ina eo-1ssion Resolution 1385
with a new Coadltioa 19 to aitlpte aOUDd nanatina fn.. the
10ad1na dock.
IIotion carried, 5-0
Moved by C.::unc. Heye1."s. seconded by Counc. J2cksoa to approve
32-U-14 in &ccordance with Planning Commission Resolution 1386
with conditi~~ 12 revised as above and c~ndltion 22 deleted and
replaced as ..."ave.
Motion carr.~d, 5-0
(a) Firs: !'ë~inl of O1."dlaance )(0. 616: "An Ordin¿¡nre of the
C~ty 0: Cupertino Aaending Section 1 of Ordinancé ~o. 2 by
lez~ni~¡ Approximately 4 + acres fr~ P (Planned DP~c:lopm~nt
wlth General Coccercial lñt..nt) Zone to P (Plann"d Developmen
with Ir.Justrial Use Intent) Zone; Located at t!¡e Southeast
Con.e: d the Intersection of Reardon Drive and Valley Green
Drive." - read by the City Clerk.
Moved by Ccune. Jackson, seconded by Counc. Nellis to have
Ordinance s~. 615 read by titl~ only and the Clerk's reading sh¿¡) I
constitute t~e First Readinl.
Hot ion carr ied, 5-0
A øentlcman in the audience requested agenda item 33 be continued
to the following night.
.
CC-251
Paae 11
28-~74
approved
32-U-14
approved
Ord. 676
First reading
'ì
_._-~-
et
..
,
Œ- 2Sl
Pðee 12
MINUTES OF ~IE FEBIlØAKt 18, 1975 CITY COUNCIL I1EETØG
l-V-75
approved
AppUcatiøD 1-9-75 of D1'¡ldend Industries. Iøc:.: Vadance
to reduce dÌíár.re4 alnbna rea1." aetback distance for a
duplex 1Iu1J.H~I'ftÎÌlt8D feet to nine feet on Lot 1. Tract 5615.
Said prv"..~ iå located at the aoúthwut corner of Vista Drive
and Fonn SC~. bco...nded fo1." approval.
(1) IIesolûiøD 10. .3SS0: "A "solution of the City Council of the
City of Cafert1no Granting a Variance to Dlvideod Industries.
Ine.. to ledaee the Required Miniaua Rear Setback Distance
for a Daplex Building fro. Ten Feet to Rine Feet on Lot 1,
Tract 5615 Wcated at the Southwest Corner of Vista Drive
and Forest Street." - read by the City Clerk.
Moved by Counc. Nell1a. seconded by Coonc. Meyers to approve application
I-V-15 and adopt Resolution Ro. 3850.
14.
(d)
Motion carr!ed, 5-0
ARCHITE':''TURAL AND SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION
15. (a) Application HC-5l,264.1 of Urich Oil Company requesting
approval of signing for an existing service station located
on the southeast corner of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Blaney
Avenue. Recommended for approval.
Hr. Robert Brower, representing Urich, asked for approval as origina~ly
sub~itted and not as agended by the H-Control. Their reco~~endation would
cost 3 times as much. Also, it was a 2 to 2 tied vote of the H r~ntrol
with one member absent. Photos of b typical sign were submitted by the
appl i:ant.
Mr. Brower asked for ?ermission to lnstall astro turf and artlficial
landscaping, but said he was told the City is totally against this.
Their experience is that since they have only payroll employees without
a flnancial interest ~n the station, that they will have maintenance
problCQ~ with live landscapina.
Counc. Frolich said he has no problem with the size of the sign as
prc?"sed. As to the artificial landscaping, if done properly it is
hard to spot. Also, if we insist on live l.ndscaping we should also
have sprinklers on tLaers.
Counc. Jackson said M has trouble going along with artificial landscapina
but could go alona with the original sign pr~posal.
Counc. Meyers ..as in favor of artificial landscaping where the trees hide
the pole.
..
ee
,.
ØINUTES OF THE FEBlWAJtY la. 1975 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Øøved by COaDc, IIellis. SH T~ by Counc. Heyers to appraYe
IIC-Sl,264.l with stad" ~. -"11:10118 1 through 7. CoD,Utioo 8
sball read 8' hiah.CClØð..,4 9. 10, and cODdltiOD 11 that the
¡.aclaeapinaU.e slø'ubber7'DOt to exceed a 3' hi&h Ii"t with It
1ÞeiDa watered by . ~ï,,.t_ connected to an BUt_tie
tiMr. The size &Del color Of the sign as odatnally propose4 v..
.-pproved ,
IIDUaD carried, 5-0
Mr. B1."OIIe1." said he can't lID al.oø& with SOl'inklus because the1."e
ia no water out to the comer.
(b) Application HC-Sl,Ol4.2 of Walt Hanson, D.C. requestlna
approval of slgniDg f~ an existing office bullding located
at 20432 Silverado Av~. Recommended for approval.
Moved by Counc. Nellis, seconded by Counc. Frolich to approve
application HC-5I,OI4.2.
Motion carried, 5-0
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
16. Adoption of Affirmative Action Plan for the City
(continued from meeting of February 3, 1975)
(a) Resolution No. 3833: "A Resolution of the City Council
of the City of CUpertino Adopting an Affirmative Action
Plan for the City of Cupertino. 01 (continued from meet in
of February 3, 1975)
Ms. Rine Rosenberg, Director, C.S.W., 10 Wost Hedding Street, San
Jose, read her prepared speech in favor of equal opportunity for
all people. In addition to the moral implications, she reminded
the City C"uncil of Federal Lavs regarding this. She "uggested
the City lo~k at the possibility of upgrading of present peoplo
on board for filling decision-making positions.
Counc. Meyers believed the st.ff has already spoken to these issue
and wanted to ao ahead with tbe Resolution.
Counc. Frolich quoted D1.". Jaazell in regard to all citizens being
treated e~uslly, according to individual merit.
We should advertise OU1." openings where people who might be quallfi
aiaht see them. His concern is how our goals are interpreted.
Page 12, paragraph 2 speaks to quotas and goals and page IS spcaks
to implementation.
CC-251
Pace 13
øc-Sl,264.1
àppl'OYed
HC-5l,014.2
approved
;~~,:;:.
..~
-I.
-,
"
ee
Ie
.'
MINUTES OF tHE mlllLUY 18. 1975 CITY COUNCIL MEETIIG
Counc. J-"""" 8aid the 14th Mendment of the Const1t11tial bas been in
. effeet _ nœber of,..n. JIa thinks it is high ti8B tho.« in.r1tutiona
that are sedoua about erølDl lome of these probl'" beeoIIe specific.
e be1ians that the CiCy staff is In ~d faith tryiDa to achieve!
these BOalS. ·
t
CoIIIIC. 1'ro11ch be1iev.. ~ 18 posslble to be specific without beiDa
ted.
,
Moved by Counc. Nell18, se.:...wed by Counc. Jackson to adopt the
Afflraative Action Plan and Resolution No. 3833.
Mo,lon carried, 5-0
NEW BUSL'ŒSS
II. Pro~sal for adoption of a new City Flag.
No action at this time.
Continued to March 3, 1975.
8. Discussion on ~alter Hayes' request that the Clty oppose the
roposed elimination of l1alts on ground water charges,
Mr. Dave Gill, Santa Clara Valley Water District, 5150 Al"~den Expressway,
San Jose, 95118, urged the City to not adopt the reco~enèed resolution.
Moved by Ceunc. Jackson to table any further action on_~!r. Hayes request~
his motion died for lack of a second.
Moved by Counc. Frolich, seconded by Counc. Jackson to go on record as
being in favor of the r820val of the elimination of li~its on ground
water charges and to reGuest the staff submit letters a~cordingly to
our State legislators.
Motlon carried, 5-0
The staff was instructed to develop written sl'odards in explanation
of the determination of t,<,ip ends prior to the 5ubmission of the next
applicable application.
~..
- ,
,..(.
Ie
ee
ØDU'1'ES OF THE FEBRUARY 18. 1975 CITY COUNCIL HEETIKC
IIIJor Sparlts stated that ... to tbe hour, the bal_ce of the
I ø.Ja sbould be taJcea eøa of die follov1na D1¡1at:.
Ø3iuullllOft.1lf
Ifne4 by Counc. JaeltsoD. _.....ed by Counc. Meyen to ..Jjoum this
--:lna at 12:13 a... to 1:30 p... on lebruo1,"J 19. 1975 in the
Caaference Roœ.
lIot1oø carded, 5-0
APPJIØVED :
Is/ Reed Sparks
Mayor, City of Cupertino
IJTEST :
/./ wm. F. Ryder
City Cluk
CC-2S1
Pap lS
.