The URL can be used to link to this page

02-05-19 Searchable packetCITY OF CUPERTINO AGENDA CITY COUNCIL 5:30 PM 10300 Torre Avenue and 10350 Torre Avenue Tuesday, February 5, 2019 Non-televised Special Meeting Closed Session (5:30) and Televised Regular Meeting (6:45) NOTICE AND CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Cupertino City Council is hereby called for Tuesday, February 05, 2019, commencing at 5:30 p.m. for a Closed Session in City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014. Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business on the subject matters listed below under the heading, “Special Meeting." The regular meeting items will be heard at 6:45 p.m. in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. SPECIAL MEETING ROLL CALL - 5:30 PM 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Conference Room A CLOSED SESSION 1.Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code Section 54956.8); Property: Cupertino Municipal Water System; Agency Negotiator: Timm Borden; Negotiating Parties: City of Cupertino and San Jose Water Company; Under Negotiation: Price Terms for City Leased Asset 2.Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant Exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING Page 1 1 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 PM 10350 Torre Avenue, Community Hall Council Chamber ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject: Recognition of Fine Arts Commission Emerging Artists and Young Artists. Recommended Action: Present awards to winners 2.Subject: Presentation from the Toyokawa Sister City Committee regarding recent delegation Recommended Action: Receive Presentation from the Toyokawa Sister City Committee regarding recent delegation POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 3.Subject: Approve the January 15 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the January 15 City Council minutes A - Draft Minutes 4.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 02, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-013 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 02, 2018 A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report Page 2 2 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA 5.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 09, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-014 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 09, 2018 A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report 6.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 16, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-015 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 16, 2018 A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report 7.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 23, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-016 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 23, 2018 A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report 8.Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 30, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-017 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 30, 2018 A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report 9.Subject: Annual adoption of Pension Trust Investment Policy Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-018 accepting the City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Pension Investment Policy 10.Subject: Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 Recommended Action: Accept the Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 Staff Report A - Investment Portfolio, Wells Fargo Value Comparison Report, Supplemental Portfolio Analysis SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Page 3 3 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA 11.Subject: Second reading and enactment of an ordinance to amend regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission. Recommended Action: Conduct the second reading and enact Ordinance No. 19-2182: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code, Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission” Staff Report A - Draft Ordinance 19-2182 PUBLIC HEARINGS ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 12.Subject: Approval of a Legal Services Contract for City Attorney Services with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger. Recommended Action: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger for City Attorney Services in the amount of $600,000 annually. 2. Approve Budget Modification Number 1819-038 reducing the Administration-City Attorney budget by $770,889. Staff Report A – Request for Proposal B - Agreement 13.Subject: Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 (Continued from January 15) Recommended Action: Note objections and adopt Resolution 19-019 ordering abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Weed Abatement Program Commencement Report C - Notice to Destroy Weeds and Program Schedule D - Approved Resolution No. 18-111 STUDY SESSION Page 4 4 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA 14.Subject: Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Recommended Action: Accept presentation on the Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan ("Master Plan") and provide direction regarding desired revisions. Staff Report A - Input on Draft Master Plan, Bicycle Pedestrian Commission, 01.16.19 B - Input on Draft Master Plan, Teen Forum, 01.22.19 C - Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Workshop, 01.23.19 D - Input on Draft Master Plan, Parks & Rec Comm. Draft Meeting Minutes, 01.24.19 E - Input on Draft Master Plan, Additional Public Comments, through 01.28.19.pdf F - Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Comments Received, 01.29.19 to 02.03.19 ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS - Continued 15.Subject: Possible Formation of a Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) subregion allowing the City the option of trading allocation of housing needs among participating entities (continued from January 15). Recommended Action: That the City Council 1. Review the by-laws proposed for the RHNA subregion and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 19-009 authorizing the City Manager to discuss the formation of a Santa Clara County RHNA subregion and develop a work plan, budget and schedule of actions leading to the formation of a countywide RHNA subregion. Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - SCC RHNA Subregion by-laws C - San Mateo County RHNA Subregion Bylaws 2011 D - RHNA subregion overview E - Pros and Cons of RHNA Subregion 16.Subject: Adopt a resolution to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No 19-020 to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Staff Report A - Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study B - Draft Resolution REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF 17.Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Page 5 5 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA ADJOURNMENT Page 6 6 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Prior to seeking judicial review of any adjudicatory (quasi-judicial) decision, interested persons must file a petition for reconsideration within ten calendar days of the date the City Clerk mails notice of the City’s decision. Reconsideration petitions must comply with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code §2.08.096. Contact the City Clerk’s office for more information or go to http://www.cupertino.org/index.aspx? page=125 for a reconsideration petition form. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next City Council meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the Council meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, City Council meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during Page 7 7 February 5, 2019City Council AGENDA consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Council, and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to the podium and the Mayor will recognize you. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. Page 8 8 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4890 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/18/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code Section 54956.8); Property: Cupertino Municipal Water System; Agency Negotiator: Timm Borden; Negotiating Parties: City of Cupertino and San Jose Water Company; Under Negotiation: Price Terms for City Leased Asset Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Government Code Section 54956.8); Property: Cupertino Municipal Water System; Agency Negotiator: Timm Borden; Negotiating Parties: City of Cupertino and San Jose Water Company; Under Negotiation: Price Terms for City Leased Asset CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™9 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4221 Name: Status:Type:Closed Session Agenda Ready File created:In control:7/26/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant Exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant Exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™10 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4653 Name: Status:Type:Ceremonial Matters & Presentations Agenda Ready File created:In control:11/27/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Recognition of Fine Arts Commission Emerging Artists and Young Artists. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Recognition of Fine Arts Commission Emerging Artists and Young Artists. Present awards to winners CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™11 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4734 Name: Status:Type:Ceremonial Matters & Presentations Agenda Ready File created:In control:12/11/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Presentation from the Toyokawa Sister City Committee regarding recent delegation Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Presentation from the Toyokawa Sister City Committee regarding recent delegation Receive Presentation from the Toyokawa Sister City Committee regarding recent delegation CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™12 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4521 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:10/24/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Approve the January 15 City Council minutes Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A - Draft Minutes Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Approve the January 15 City Council minutes Approve the January 15 City Council minutes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™13 DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 15, 2019 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING At 5:30 p.m. Mayor Steven Scharf called the Special City Council meeting to order in the City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue. Present: Mayor Steven Scharf, Vice Mayor Liang Chao, and Councilmembers Darcy Paul, Rod Sinks, and Jon Robert Willey. Absent: None. CLOSED SESSION Council went into closed session and reconvened in open session at 6:45 p.m. in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chambers, 10350 Torre Avenue for the Regular Meeting. In open session, Mayor Scharf reported out from the January 15, 2019 closed session that was added at 5:15 p.m. regarding one item: Subject: Public Employee Dismissal/Release; (Gov’t Code Section 54957(b)); Consideration of terms of separation for Acting City Attorney/Senior Assistant City Attorney. Written communications included an email to Council. The following individual spoke in open session before Council went into closed session: Kitty Moore (Cupertino resident) Mayor Scharf reported that no reportable action was taken. 1. Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiator (Gov't Code 54956.8); Property: 10800 Torre Avenue, Agency Negotiator: Chad Mosley (Coffee Society); Under Negotiation: Lease Extension Mayor Scharf reported that further direction was given to the City’s negotiators and no reportable action was taken. 14 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 2. Subject: Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Properties: APN 375-21-001, Lawrence Expressway at Mitty Avenue and APN 381- 19-015, Lawrence Expressway at Doyle Road. Agency Negotiators: Chad Mosley. Negotiating Parties: San Jose Water Company; County Roads and Airports; City of San Jose. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment. Mayor Scharf reported that further direction was given to the City’s negotiators and no reportable action was taken. Mayor Scharf also reported out from the January 2, 2019 closed session regarding one item: Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One Potential Case (regarding tort claim). Written communications included emails to Council and a statement by Barry Chang. The following individuals spoke in open session before Council went into closed session: Barry Chang Lisa Warren (Cupertino resident) Tessa Parish (Cupertino resident) Mayor Scharf report that no reportable action was taken. A copy of the claim is available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office. Mayor Scharf also reported out from the January 8, 2019 closed session regarding two items: Subject: Public Employee Appointment; Title: City Attorney; Authority: California Gov. Code Sections 54957, 54957(b); Interviews with outside law firms to provide City Attorney services under contract. Written communications included an email to Council. The following individuals spoke in open session before Council went into closed session: Jim Moore (Cupertino resident) Kitty Moore (Cupertino resident) 15 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 Mayor Scharf reported that Council selected the law firm of Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger and directed staff to negotiate a contract with the firm. The City Attorney contract with Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger will be scheduled for a regular meeting of the City Council once it is finished. This is a contract City Attorney firm. Subject: Public Employee Appointment; Title: City Attorney; Authority: California Gov. Code Sections 54957, 54957(b); Topic: Recruitment of in-house City Attorney Mayor Scharf reported that Council discussed whether to recruit for an in-house City Attorney or to not move forward and Council decided to not move forward with an in- house City Attorney. Mayor Scharf also reported out from the January 14, 2019 closed session regarding three items: Subject: Conference with Labor Negotiator (Government Code Section 54957.6); City designated representatives: Director of Administrative Services and City Manager; Employee organizations: Operating Engineers Local No. 3 Union; Cupertino Employees' Association; Unrepresented (Management and Confidential) Employees' Compensation Program Written communications included emails to Council. The following individuals spoke in open session before Council went into closed session: Rhoda Fry (Cupertino resident) – distributed written materials James Moore (Cupertino resident) Kitty Moore (Cupertino resident) Mayor Scharf reported that no reportable action was taken. Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)): a. Significant Exposure to Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)) (2 matters) b. Possible Initiation of Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)) (2 matters) Mayor Scharf reported that Council discussed three complaint letters received from the Coblentz Law Firm, attorneys for Vallco Property Owners, alleging common law conflicts 16 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 of interests and other allegations pertaining to financial interests under the Political Reform Act and new FPPC rules and that no reportable action was taken. The Council discussed with legal counsel the letters of complaint it received from the Nielsen law firm attorneys, for Vallco Property Owners, challenging the validity of two referendum petitions related to the Vallco Specific Plan and no reportable action was taken. The Council discussed possible initiation of litigation in two matters and no reportable action was taken. Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation; (Government Code section 54956.9(d)): Mayor Scharf reported that the Council met in closed session to discuss with legal counsel pending litigation for which discussion in open session would prejudice the City and the litigation. Legal counsel provided an update on the following matters and the Council requested that the legal counsel return to a future closed session for further updates and deliberation so no reportable action was taken at this time. This was on the cases of Friends of Better Cupertino, et al. v. City of Cupertino. a. Friends of Better Cupertino, et al. v. City of Cupertino (SB 35 Vallco Project); Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 18CV330190 b. Friends of Better Cupertino, et al. v. City of Cupertino (Vallco Specific Plan - 2 Ordinances); Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 18CV337015 c. Committee Supporting Cupertino Citizens’ Sensible Growth Initiative, et al v. Schmidt, et al. (Measure C); Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 16CV296322 d. Sparks, et al., v. Schmidt, et al. (Gateway Initiative); Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 16CV301471 Regarding four items about legal counsel for pending litigation, with respect to two of the items, Vice Mayor Chao recused herself from discussion out of abundance of caution, pending further advice from the Olson Hagel law firm, the City’s outside counsel on the matter, and from the FPPC regarding a potential financial conflict. This concerns the Vice Mayor’s residence, which is about 939 feet away from Vallco. And with respect to the item Committee Supporting Cupertino Citizens’ Sensible Growth Initiative, even though he is no longer a plaintiff on that case, Mayor Scharf recused himself 17 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 from that discussion, out of abundance of caution. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Steven Scharf called the Regular City Council meeting in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chambers, 10350 Torre Avenue and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Steven Scharf, Vice Mayor Liang Chao, and Councilmembers Darcy Paul, Rod Sinks, and Jon Robert Willey. Absent: None. CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS - None POSTPONEMENTS 1. Subject: Continue Item No. 18 to Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 until February 5 and the item will be re-noticed Recommended Action: Continue Item No. 18 to Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 until February 5 and the item will be re-noticed Paul moved and Sinks seconded to continue Item No. 18 to Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18 -111 until February 5 and the item will be re-noticed. The motion carried unanimously. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Gayla Johnson (Cupertino resident) talked about concern over 5G small cell deployment in the City. Jennifer Griffin talked about concern over new hotel being built in San Jose on Cupertino border in Rancho Rinconada area. Jean Bedord (Cupertino resident) talked about Councilmembers’ conflict of interest 18 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 regarding Vallco and posting letters to the City website. Cathy Helgerson (Cupertino resident) talked about concerns over Lehigh Cement and Quarry – distributed written comments Jayan Trujillo on behalf of AYSO 64 Soccer talked about using the fields on Sundays to play soccer. Edwin Chavez on behalf of AYSO 64 Soccer talked about using the fields on Sundays to play soccer. Barry Chang talked about the former City Attorney’s tort claim and the referendum petitions. Marie Liu (Cupertino resident) talked about the current and potential lawsuits against the City. Tom Pyke (Cupertino resident) on behalf of Congressman Ro Khanna talked about an upcoming congressional town hall meeting in Cupertino on January 26 at Lawson middle school. Hemant Buch (Cupertino resident) on behalf of CCA talked about cricket. Lawrence Fan (Cupertino resident) talked about Regnart Creek Trail. Victoria Fierce on behalf of CaRLA talked about SB35 - distributed written comments. Julia Miyakawa (Cupertino resident) talked about the Regnart Creek Trail and feasibility study. Connie Cunningham (Cupertino resident) talked about affordable housing and traffic. Heather Dean (Cupertino resident) talked about concern over current Councilmembers’ ties to Better Cupertino. Ganesh Prasad (Cupertino resident) on behalf of CCA talked about using the fields on Sundays to play soccer. Jay Kanth (Cupertino resident) on behalf of AYSO Soccer talked about using the fields on Sundays to play soccer. 19 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 Rhoda Fry (Cupertino resident) talked about concerns with pollution by Lehigh Hanson. CONSENT CALENDAR Sinks moved and Paul seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as presented with the exception of item numbers 10 and 12 which were pulled for discussion. Ayes: Scharf, Chao, Paul, Sinks, and Willey. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 2. Subject: Approve the December 18 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the December 18 City Council minutes 3. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending September 21, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-001 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending September 21, 2018 4. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending September 28, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-002 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending September 28, 2018 5. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending October 05, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-003 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending October 05, 2018 6. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending October 12, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-004 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending October 12, 2018 7. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending October 19, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-005 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending October 19, 2018 8. Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending October 26, 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-006 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending October 26, 2018 9. Subject: Out of Class Compensation for Interim City Manager Appointment Recommended Action: 1. Adopt Resolution 19-007 to revise the Appointed (City Manager and City Attorney) Employees’ Compensation Program; and 2. Approve Out of Class Compensation for Interim City Manager, Timm Borden. 20 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 10. Subject: Rescind Resolution No. 18-115 which adopted the City of Cupertino Code of Ethics and Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-008 rescinding Resolution No. 18-115 which adopted the City of Cupertino Code of Ethics and Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials Written communications for this item included emails and letter to Council. Senior Management Analyst Katy Nomura reviewed the staff report. Mayor Scharf opened public comment and the following individuals spoke: Heather Dean (Cupertino resident) Jean Bedord (Cupertino resident) Cathy Helgerson Ed Hirshfield (Cupertino resident) Marie Liu (Cupertino resident) Jennifer Griffin Mayor Scharf closed public comment. Paul moved and Scharf seconded to adopt Resolution No. 19-008 rescinding Resolution No. 18-115 which adopted the City of Cupertino Code of Ethics and Conduct for Elected and Appointed Officials under the November 20, 2018 agenda item, number 11 which was titled, “Overview of City Commissions and recommendations for improving their effectiveness and communications with the City Council.” The motion carried with Sinks and Willey voting no. 11. Subject: Approve Budget Modification No. 1819-035 resulting in an increased budget appropriation of $17,927 to fund Cupertino’s contribution to the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Community Roundtable on aircraft noise Recommended Action: Approve Budget Modification No. 1819-035 resulting in an increased budget appropriation of $17,927 to fund Cupertino’s contribution to the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz Community Roundtable on aircraft noise 12. Subject: Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) subregion formation. Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 19-009 (Attachment A) to authorize the City Manager to: 1. Enter into discussions related to the formation of a Santa Clara County RHNA subregion and develop a work plan, budget and schedule of 21 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 actions leading to the formation of a countywide RHNA subregion; and 2. Present a recommendation on whether or not to participate in the RHNA subregion upon further study and discussions. Written communications for this item included a staff presentation. Principal Planner Piu Ghosh reviewed the staff report. Andi Jordan from the Cities Association of Santa Clara County responded to questions from Council. Mayor Scharf opened public comment and the following individuals spoke: Connie Cunningham (Cupertino resident) Jennifer Griffin Barry Chang (Cupertino resident) Mayor Scharf closed public comment. Paul moved and Willey seconded to continue this item to a future meeting. The motion carried unanimously. 13. Subject: Application for Alcohol Beverage License for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (dba Kura Revolving Sushi Bar), 19600 Vallco Parkway, Suite 160 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the application for Alcohol Beverage License for Kura Sushi USA, Inc. (dba Kura Revolving Sushi Bar), 19600 Vallco Parkway, Suite 160 Council recessed from 9:00 p.m. to 9:10 p.m. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 14. Subject: Consider whether to authorize the formal submission of a General Plan Amendment application to increase height, revise building plane, and reduce setback for a modified General Plan Amendment Authorization application for a 155-room hotel to replace an existing 8,323 sq. ft. commercial building (Goodyear Tire.) A previous General Plan Amendment Authorization application (GPAAUTH-2017-01) was authorized to submit General Plan Amendment applications by the City Council in August 2017. 22 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 (Application No.(s): GPAAuth-2018-01; Applicant: Sherly Kwok(De Anza Properties); Location: 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard; APN(s): 326-10-061) Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-010 after determining if General Plan Amendment Authorization application (GPAAUTH-2018-01) is authorized to move forward to apply for General Plan Amendments. Written communications for this item included emails to Council, updated page to plan set, and a staff presentation. Associate Planner Gian Martire reviewed the staff report and presentation. Applicant John Vidovich gave a presentation regarding the application. Architect Bill Winkleman answered questions from Council. Mayor Scharf opened the public hearing and the following individuals spoke: Peggy Griffin (Cupertino resident) Bin Liu (Palo Alto resident) Jennifer Griffin Sherley (Cupertino resident) Claudio Bono (Cupertino resident) Khryati (Cupertino resident) Barry Chang (Cupertino resident) Gilbert Wong (Cupertino resident) Charles Cheng (Cupertino resident) Rhoda Fry Mayor Scharf closed the public hearing. Scharf moved and Paul seconded to adopt Resolution No. 19-010 authorizing General Plan Amendment Authorization application (GPAAUTH-2018-01) to move forward to apply for General Plan Amendments with the following voluntary community amenities: • Complementary use of conference facilities for public schools within Cupertino and City of Cupertino for up to 12 days per year; • Reduced rate for use of hotel shuttle for Cupertino residents for airport transportation needs on the hotel’s schedule; • Funding of a one-time payment of $500,000; and 23 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 • An enclosed rooftop restaurant/bar with public access, not to exceed height of any rooftop mechanical equipment enclosure. The motion carried with Willey voting no. Council recessed from 11:20 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 15. Subject: Accept the City of Cupertino Storm Drain Master Plan dated September 2018 Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-011 accepting the City of Cupertino Storm Drain Master Plan dated September 2018 Written communications for this item included a staff presentation. City Engineer and Acting Assistant Director of Public Works Chad Mosley reviewed the staff report and presentation. Paul moved and Sinks seconded to adopt Resolution No. 19-011 accepting the City of Cupertino Storm Drain Master Plan dated September 2018. The motion carried unanimously. 16. Subject: Discussion and consideration of a potential new property-related fee for clean water and storm drainage; approve funding of up to $140,500 to complete a Proposition 218 compliant storm water management fee study and balloting process; receive completed public opinion survey findings of SCI Consulting Group concerning the proposed fee; and approve the following recommendations: Recommended Action: 1. Receive the findings of the survey; and 2. Authorize staff to retain SCI Consulting Group for a contract amount not to exceed $140,500 to complete a Proposition 218 compliant property related storm water management fee study by March 2019 and completion of a potential balloting process as early as July 2019; and 3. Direct staff to bring the storm water management fee study back for Council consideration with an amount of up to an additional $50 per year charge for a typical residential parcel and a new additional charge for apartment/commercial/industrial and vacant parcels as will be determined by the storm water management fee study; and 4. Approve Budget Modification 1819-036 and adopt Resolution No 19-012 approving a Budget Adjustment in the amount of $140,500 to complete a storm water management fee study and balloting process. Written communications for this item included emails to Council, a staff presentation, and consultant presentation. 24 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 Acting Director of Public Works Roger Lee reviewed the staff report and presentation. John Bliss and Susan Barnes from SCI Consulting Group gave a presentation. Sinks moved Scharf seconded to: 1. Receive the findings of the survey; and 2. Authorize staff to retain SCI Consulting Group for a contract amount not to exceed $140,500 to complete a Proposition 218 compliant property related storm water management fee study by March 2019 and completion of a potential balloting pro cess as early as July 2019; and 3. Direct staff to bring the storm water management fee study back for Council consideration with an amount of up to an additional $50 per year charge for a typical residential parcel and a new additional charge for apartment/commercial/industrial and vacant parcels as will be determined by the storm water management fee study; and 4. Approve Budget Modification 1819-036 and adopt Resolution No 19-012 approving a Budget Adjustment in the amount of $140,500 to complete a storm water management fee study and balloting process. The motion carried unanimously. 17. Subject: Introduction of an ordinance to amend regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission Recommended Action: Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 19-2182: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code, Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission” and schedule second reading for February 5, 2019 to enact said ordinance Senior Planner Catarina Kidd reviewed the staff report. City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of Ordinance No. 19-2182: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code, Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission.” 25 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 Paul moved and Sinks seconded to read Ordinance No. 19-2182 by title only and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Ayes: Scharf, Chao, Paul, Sinks, and Willey. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 18. Subject: Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 (under Postponements was continued to February 5 and will be re-noticed) Recommended Action: Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 (under Postponements was continued to February 5 and will be re-noticed) Under Postponements, this item was continued to February 5 and will be re-noticed. 19. Subject: Council Committee assignments Recommended Action: Approve Council Committee assignments Paul moved and Willey seconded to approve Council Committee assignments. The motion carried unanimously. REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF 20. Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Councilmember Willey asked staff to look into use of sport s fields on Sundays (Mayor agreed to agendize this); noted interest in a Resident Advisory Group and will bring this to the goal setting meeting on February 2; asked staff to explore a new community survey on heights, planes, and setbacks. Councilmember Paul asked staff to follow-up on a Code of Ethics and Conduct being posted in the Senior Center. Vice Mayor Chao asked that staff follow-up on these items: Post all letters sent by Coblentz, Patch Duffy & Bass LLP regarding conflict of interest allegations to the City’s website; post information regarding the upcoming town hall meeting with Congressman Ro Khanna on January 26 at Lawson Middle School; provide status on Apple transportation in lieu of a head tax (Mayor agreed to agendize this); look into ability to recruit members of the public and/or college students to review legislative bills with the City’s Legislative Review Committee. 26 City Council Minutes January 15, 2019 Councilmember Sinks asked that staff look into the financial impact of the CASA Compact (Mayor agreed to agendize this); asked staff to explore an op-ed on jobs/housing balance to educate the public on steps the City has taken regarding housing. Mayor Scharf asked staff to post an updated version of the Regnart Creek Trail Feasibility Study. Councilmembers highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events. ADJOURNMENT At 1:05 a.m. on Wednesday, January 16, 2019 , Mayor Scharf adjourned the meeting . ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk 27 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4855 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/10/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 02, 2018 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 02, 2018 Adopt Resolution No. 19-013 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 02, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING November 2, 2018 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Zach Korach, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor, City of Cupertino 29 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Main Account - Main Checking Account Check 717863 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable 3M $1,689.52 Invoice Date Description Amount 9402425702 10/15/2018 Streets Sign Markings: Cuttable Film, Tape $1,158.30 9402385488 10/10/2018 Streets Sign Markings: 3M Marker $531.22 717864 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable 4LEAF INC $37,058.77 Invoice Date Description Amount J1848A35 10/26/2018 AC2 #501 Building Inspections 2018/09 $37,058.77 717865 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ADVANCED SYSTEMS GROUP $898.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 23802 08/24/2018 Tiger Technology Maintenance & Support (one year)$898.00 717866 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ADVANTAGE GRAFIX $658.77 Invoice Date Description Amount 42493 10/26/2018 SF food scraps pilot door hangers $380.96 42449 10/19/2018 SF food scraps pilot postcards $277.81 717867 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable AIA(AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECT $846.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 2010057401 10/08/2018 2019 Membership for Alex Acenas $846.50 717868 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALDANA, JOSE, B.$270.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2955 10/27/2018 AV Office Rack; ProBlox & Fiber Optic Cable project $270.00 717869 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALHAMBRA & SIERRA SPRINGS $105.36 Invoice Date Description Amount 4984902 100618 10/06/2018 water $105.36 717870 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC $103.17 Invoice Date Description Amount 11046175 10/19/2018 Hazmat No Air Repair Kits $80.63 11045871 10/18/2018 Misc Equipment Parts $22.54 717871 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING $599.01 Invoice Date Description Amount 0124703 10/16/2018 2018 S-69 Supplement pages $495.46 0124747 10/25/2018 2018 S-69 Folio supplement $103.55 717872 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ANDY BADAL $53.40 Invoice Date Description Amount AndyB102818 10/28/2018 AndyB102818 Phone Reimburse 9/29/18 - 10/28/18 $53.40 717873 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ANYA KROTH $10.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 Flex Passes from QiGong Instruction - 3 $10.80 717874 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable AT&T $15,754.58 Invoice Date Description Amount 12031721 10/12/2018 9391023219 09/12/18-10/11/18 $100.59 12031725 10/12/2018 9391023223 09/12-10/11/18 $99.66 12031722-1 10/12/2018 City Council $150.38 12031722-2 10/12/2018 City Manager $75.32 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 1 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 30 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 12031722-3 10/12/2018 City Clerk $224.13 12031722-4 10/12/2018 City Attorney $276.17 12031722-5 10/12/2018 Sherriffs $125.53 12031722-6 10/12/2018 Code Enforcement $175.74 12031722-7 10/12/2018 Community Services $50.21 12031722-8 10/12/2018 Disaster Preparedness $75.32 12031722-9 10/12/2018 Govt Channel $75.32 12031722-10 10/12/2018 Finance Admin $75.32 12031722-11 10/12/2018 Finance Acctg $150.64 12031722-12 10/12/2018 Business License $75.32 12031722-13 10/12/2018 Human Resources $150.64 12031722-14 10/12/2018 Information Tech $477.02 12031722-15 10/12/2018 Parks & Rec Admin $75.32 12031722-16 10/12/2018 QCC Cultural superv.$175.74 12031722-17 10/12/2018 Quinlan Center $401.70 12031722-18 10/12/2018 Youth Teen program $50.21 12031722-19 10/12/2018 Sports Physical prog.$75.32 12031722-20 10/12/2018 Sports Ctr prog.$301.27 12031722-21 10/12/2018 Senior Center $301.27 12031722-22 10/12/2018 Case Manager $25.11 12031722-23 10/12/2018 BBF Office $251.06 12031722-24 10/12/2018 BBF Park $125.53 12031722-25 10/12/2018 Blackberry Golf $25.11 12031722-26 10/12/2018 Nature Program $25.11 12031722-27 10/12/2018 Planning Admin $75.32 12031722-28 10/12/2018 Planning Current $225.95 12031722-29 10/12/2018 Planning Long Range $50.21 12031722-30 10/12/2018 BMR Housing $50.21 12031722-31 10/12/2018 Building $326.38 12031722-32 10/12/2018 Plan Check $25.11 12031722-33 10/12/2018 Building Inspector $100.42 12031722-34 10/12/2018 Public Works Adm $125.53 12031722-35 10/12/2018 Resource Recovery $25.11 12031722-36 10/12/2018 Non Point Source $25.11 12031722-37 10/12/2018 Engineering $225.95 12031722-38 10/12/2018 PW Inspector $25.11 12031722-39 10/12/2018 Service Center Adm.$189.07 12031722-40 10/12/2018 City Hall $793.87 12031722-41 10/12/2018 Service Center $673.85 12031722-42 10/12/2018 Quinlan Center $100.42 12031722-43 10/12/2018 McClellan Ranch $225.95 12031722-44 10/12/2018 Monta Vista $50.21 12031722-45 10/12/2018 Wilson Park $20.59 12031722-46 10/12/2018 Sports Center $95.85 12031722-47 10/12/2018 Teen Center $105.00 12031722-48 10/12/2018 Creekside $50.40 12031722-49 10/12/2018 Traffic $75.32 12031722-50 10/12/2018 Signal Maintenance $100.42 12031722-51 10/12/2018 Street Maintenance $20.72 12031722-52 10/12/2018 City Hall 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $1,053.82 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 2 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 31 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 12031722-53 10/12/2018 City Attorney's Office 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $715.70 12031722-54 10/12/2018 Quinlan 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $715.70 12031722-55 10/12/2018 Sr Center 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $715.70 12031722-56 10/12/2018 Spt Center 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $446.85 12031722-57 10/12/2018 Service Center 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $715.70 12031722-58 10/12/2018 BBF 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $406.05 12031722-59 10/12/2018 Nature Program 2343448559849 - circuit/IP services $406.05 12031820 10/12/2018 9391023217 09/12/18-10/11/18 $88.27 12031724 10/12/2018 9391023222 09/12/18-10/11/18 $20.59 12031819 10/12/2018 9391023218 09/12/18-10/11/18 $69.52 12031723 10/12/2018 9391023221 09/12/18-10/11/18 $227.09 12031727 10/12/2018 9391023225 09/12/18-10/11/18 $21.03 12031821 10/12/2018 9391023216 09/12/18-10/11/18 $98.81 12031822 10/12/2018 9391023215 09/12/18-10/11/18 $109.77 12018124 10/10/2018 9391051384 09/10/18-10/09/18 $1,952.85 12031729 10/12/2018 9391023227 09/12/18-10/11/18 $18.94 717875 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BALANCE HYDROLOGICS INC $9,502.56 Invoice Date Description Amount 216119-0718 08/08/2018 SCC Park & Restore Phase 2 Monitoring - Payment #29 $6,080.06 216119-0918 10/03/2018 SCC Park & Restore Phase 2 Monitoring - Payment #30 $3,422.50 717876 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC.$21,126.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 18139-A 10/22/2018 Haul Road Trail, Service 9.7.18 through 10.15.18 $21,126.00 717877 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BENCH, MICHAEL , L $1,710.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 18-086C 10/08/2018 Wesptort #864 Arborist Consultant 2018/08 $1,710.00 717878 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BLUETARP FINANCIAL, INC $98.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 41272748 10/17/2018 Double Sided Pyramid Wheel Shock $98.00 717879 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BOETHING TREELAND FARMS INC $1,629.20 Invoice Date Description Amount SI-1174590 10/19/2018 Trees/ROW - Medians: Plants, SO-1170837 $772.67 SI-1174674 10/19/2018 Trees/ROW-Medians: Plants Order #SO-1170533 $856.53 717880 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BUSINESS FURNITURE SOLUTION, INC. $10,672.89 Invoice Date Description Amount 10172018 10/17/2018 Deposit for furniture and installation for 6 new work stations $10,672.89 717881 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE $589.53 Invoice Date Description Amount 2019 10/31/2018 Cust#947065 2019 CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW POSTERS $589.53 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 3 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 32 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717882 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE $4,800.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 18050-3 10/26/2018 McClellan Trash Enclosure CA Services thru 9/30/18 $1,800.00 18049-1 10/26/2018 McClellan Community Center CA Services Rendered thru 9/30 $3,000.00 717883 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable CDW-G $1,066.99 Invoice Date Description Amount PLX1302 10/03/2018 Extreme Network Switch $727.99 PMQ9881 10/06/2018 Extreme Network Switch $339.00 717884 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable CENTURYLINK $22.18 Invoice Date Description Amount 468R-100718 10/07/2018 Emergency Phone Services 10.07-11.06 $22.18 717885 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Colonial Life & Accident Insurance $231.79 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 4800 - *Colonial Products - Pre-Tax*$231.79 717886 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST $799.85 Invoice Date Description Amount 3310-100718 10/07/2018 3310-100718 10/12/18 - 11/11/18 $799.85 717887 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST $241.20 Invoice Date Description Amount 9917-10192018 10/19/2018 8155100050719917 10/24/18-11/23/18 $241.20 717888 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC $2,649.48 Invoice Date Description Amount 70295925 10/01/2018 Business Class Internet $2,649.48 717889 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Community Health Charities of California $257.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 4400 - Community Health Charities $257.00 717890 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES INC $16,140.32 Invoice Date Description Amount 180001091 10/15/2018 Street Sweeping Oct. 2018 $12,091.34 180001121 10/15/2018 Extra Street Sweeping on Foothill Oct. 2018 $4,048.98 717891 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable CORIX WATER PRODUCTS (US) INC $273.59 Invoice Date Description Amount 17813034396 10/22/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Bolt Up sets, Gaskets $273.59 717892 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable DAVID J POWERS & ASSOCIATES $310.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 22931 10/25/2018 Permit Consulting thru 9/30/2018 17-50 McClellan Ranch Park Lot $310.00 717893 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable DEEP CLIFF ASSOCIATES L P $1,996.02 Invoice Date Description Amount 102918 10/29/2018 Fall Payment 1 $1,996.02 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 4 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 33 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717894 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable DIGITAL PRINT $477.61 Invoice Date Description Amount 19850 09/28/2018 business cards $477.61 717895 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable DIRECTV $165.98 Invoice Date Description Amount 35318925082 10/26/2018 DirecTV (10/25/18 - 11/24/18)$165.98 717896 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ELCOR ELECTRIC $1,120.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2187 10/22/2018 Installation of 2 circuits for MFP printer deployment $1,120.00 717897 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable EPAC TECHNOLOGIES INC $510.05 Invoice Date Description Amount E311481 09/21/2018 ENVELOPES WITH CITY ADDRESS $510.05 717898 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ESRI $18,200.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 93539306 10/23/2018 ArcGIS Maintenance 1/17/19 - 1/16/20 $18,200.00 717899 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable EVERGREEN PRODUCTIONS $17,833.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1002 10/29/2018 Brochure payment for Winter 2019 $17,833.00 717900 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable EWING IRRIGATION $578.30 Invoice Date Description Amount 6416193 10/25/2018 Grounds-School Site Maint: ABS Western Scoop 48 in Handle $269.69 6423081 10/26/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Topper $308.61 717901 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC $713.78 Invoice Date Description Amount 432419-00 10/24/2018 Street Tree Maint: Hard Hats, Helmets, Laser Pointer, etc. $713.78 717902 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Friends of Vision Literacy $280.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 ESL Instruction (9.5-10.31) 14 Students $280.00 717903 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable FUHSD $67,978.00 Invoice Date Description Amount FUHSDFall2018 10/30/2018 FUHSD - Fall 2018 Payment and Summer Remainder $67,978.00 717904 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRAINGER INC $2,705.85 Invoice Date Description Amount 9925388499 10/04/2018 Facilities-Service Center: Masonry Saw, Kneeling Pad $1,843.16 9933906753 10/12/2018 Facilities-Sport Center: Fluorescent Linear Lamps $817.51 9925502438 10/04/2018 Facilities-Service Center: Goggles $45.18 717905 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRANICUS INC $3,831.60 Invoice Date Description Amount 104941 10/26/2018 Legistar, Encoding, Transparency, Streaming, Open Platform $3,831.60 717906 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRIFFIN PAINTING INC $7,800.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 18059423 10/25/2018 Creekside Restroom Floors $7,800.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 5 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 34 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717907 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GYM PRECISION INC $382.10 Invoice Date Description Amount 9133 10/22/2018 repairs $382.10 717908 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable HEIDI MERRY HENN-ECKER $520.00 Invoice Date Description Amount HeidiFall2018 10/30/2018 HeidiFall2018 $520.00 717909 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable HEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS $6,247.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11980 08/03/2018 10505 Miller Ave #875 Traffic Study 2018/07 $4,000.00 12186 10/11/2018 10506 Miller Ave #875 Traffic Study 2018/08 $1,000.00 12170 10/05/2018 Cupertino Village Hotel #812 Traffic Study 2018/09 $1,247.00 717910 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS $1,200.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 266545 10/11/2018 2018-19 Membership for Aarti Shrivastava $1,200.00 717911 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ID WHOLESALER $160.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 1505888 08/28/2018 office supplies $160.50 717912 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable IFPTE LOCAL 21 $1,890.03 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 4200 - Association Dues - CEA $1,890.03 717913 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY $91.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 3527690-00 10/23/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Flags, Pipe Wrap, PVC, etc $91.16 717914 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF SAN JOSE INC. $112.79 Invoice Date Description Amount 10281324 10/29/2018 MTP-65 Battery $112.79 717915 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable JOSEPH ELECTRONICS INC.$992.44 Invoice Date Description Amount 70126 10/12/2018 Rewiring Equipment Racks in the Control Room $992.44 717916 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Keith Day Company, Inc.$300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 16431 10/24/2018 Compost delivered to Compost Site $300.00 717917 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable KIMBALL-MIDWEST $790.97 Invoice Date Description Amount 6669518 10/11/2018 Fleet: Equipment General Supplies $685.35 6677593 10/16/2018 Street Sign Markings: Lag Screws $105.62 717918 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable KMVT COMMUNITY TELEVISION $5,277.53 Invoice Date Description Amount 7321 10/31/2018 Community Access TV October 2018 $5,277.53 717919 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MAY SHEI $573.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 Brush Painting w/ May Shei Instruction (9.13-10.18) 13 students $573.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 6 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 35 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717920 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Mersich, Misty $227.81 Invoice Date Description Amount MistyM0102718 10/24/2018 Reimbursement for USDN Annual Meeting Expenses 10/14/18-10/17/18 $177.82 MistyM102418b 10/24/2018 General Supplies - Reimbursement for ipad keyboard $49.99 717921 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MICHELE WESTLAKEN $406.60 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 Feldenkrais Instruction (9/11-10/30) 11 Students 6 FLEX passes $406.60 717922 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MIG INC $8,373.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 54956 08/28/2018 Payment #15, Services from Jul 1 to Jul 31, 2018 for Parks MP $1,093.50 55356 09/28/2018 Payment #16, Services from Aug 1 to Aug 31, 2018 for Parks MP $7,280.00 717923 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Milkes, Jeff $487.68 Invoice Date Description Amount JeffM10118 10/11/2018 Reimbursement for NRPA Conference in Indiana, 9/23 -9/28 $402.01 SO3613 10/23/2018 Pizza and Politics - Reimbursement for Silver Eagle Prizes $85.67 717924 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MING FEN LEE $2,397.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 Chinese Brush Painting Instruction (9.10-10.29) 24&23 Students $2,397.00 717925 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOLARO, LISA $5,196.60 Invoice Date Description Amount MolaroFall2018-1 10/30/2018 Molaro - Fall 2018 Payment 1 $5,196.60 717926 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOOD MEDIA $94.28 Invoice Date Description Amount 54248398 11/01/2018 Music $94.28 717927 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CENTER $190.48 Invoice Date Description Amount 96683 10/30/2018 Grounds-Sports Fields: D-Comp $190.48 717928 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST $39.00 Invoice Date Description Amount Neopost100318 10/03/2018 Late Fee for Postage $39.00 717929 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable NIDHI MATHUR $540.55 Invoice Date Description Amount NidhiM100318 10/03/2018 NidhiM100318 Travel Reimburse MISAC Conference $540.55 717930 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $619.67 Invoice Date Description Amount 2591-363675 10/25/2018 Air Filter $42.41 2591-363465 10/24/2018 Window Switch $59.63 2591-364434 10/29/2018 Air Filters $159.59 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 7 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 36 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 2591-364527 10/29/2018 Diesel Engine Fuel & Hydraulic Oil $358.04 717931 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable OFFICE DEPOT $2,053.15 Invoice Date Description Amount 213572965001 10/04/2018 Coffee supplies $25.19 210930740001 09/28/2018 general office supplies $124.81 210894508001 09/28/2018 office small equipment $64.38 216358252001 10/10/2018 office small equipment $502.03 216358423001 10/10/2018 office small equipment $157.93 210873347001 09/28/2018 office supplies and small equipment $788.78 210910066001 09/28/2018 office supplies $72.29 210910068001 09/28/2018 office supplies $88.06 214583024001 10/08/2018 Surge, 8 Outlet, 12' Cord $21.18 220832686001 10/19/2018 PW Admin Office Supplies $77.39 221054374001 10/22/2018 SR2S Fall Bike Fest Cups $55.62 216752282001 10/12/2018 Office Supplies $9.12 217250852001 10/12/2018 Office Supplies $66.37 717932 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable OLM Recycling Services $50.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1915 10/29/2018 Environmental Materials: E-Waste $50.00 717933 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Operating Engineer #3 $1,512.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 4100 - Union Dues $1,512.16 717934 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable OPTICOS DESIGN, INC.$23,176.48 Invoice Date Description Amount 2018-0141 09/30/2018 Vallco #805 Specific Plan Preparation 2018/09 $23,176.48 717935 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION, INC $104,925.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 446101 10/15/2018 Purchase of 15 Multi-function Printers $104,925.80 717936 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable PERS Long Term Care Program $30.28 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 0530 - PERS Long Term Care $30.28 717937 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable PITNEY BOWES RESERVE A/C $2,202.07 Invoice Date Description Amount 1922-09232018 09/23/2018 Account # 8000909009171922 PB Account Payment Brochure Mailing $2,202.07 717938 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable PLACEWORKS, INC $4,706.37 Invoice Date Description Amount 66681 09/30/2018 Cupertino Village Hotel #812 IS/MND 2018/09 $4,706.37 717939 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable R & R INDUSTRIES INC $1,256.72 Invoice Date Description Amount 547551 10/08/2018 Safety Vests $1,256.72 717940 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable RONALD D OLDS $1,735.30 Invoice Date Description Amount 5233 10/27/2018 AV Office Rack; ProBlox & Fiber Optic Cable project $1,202.50 5232 10/21/2018 AV Office Rack Project $532.80 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 8 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 37 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717941 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SABRO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.$5,495.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2243-C 10/19/2018 Cabling BBF, Quinlan, Sports Center $5,495.00 717942 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SANTA CLARA CNTY CLERK/RECORDER $450.00 Invoice Date Description Amount ASA-2018-07 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 DP-2018-06 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 ASA-2017-06 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 R-2018-15 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 RM-2018-10 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 TR-2018-32 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 TR-2018-38 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 TUP-2018-05 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 RM-2018-24 10/23/2018 exempt filing $50.00 717943 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SCHOOLHOUSE SERVICES $19,373.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1118 06/10/2018 Fiscal and Enrollment Impact Analysis 2018/06 $19,373.00 717944 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY $183.38 Invoice Date Description Amount 102918 10/29/2018 Fall Payment 1 $183.38 717945 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SPIKES GOLF SUPPLIES, INC.$186.81 Invoice Date Description Amount 760698 10/08/2018 Golf Tees and gloves for resale $186.81 717946 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC $4,318.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1404127 08/31/2018 *Dev-in-lieu* traffic & parking impacts monitoring & mitigation $4,318.00 717947 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE $1,181.81 Invoice Date Description Amount 3391944871 10/02/2018 paper for qcc $44.04 3392010916 10/03/2018 office supplies for qcc $513.53 3392010918 10/03/2018 Credit - office supplies for qcc ($223.66) 3392010919 10/03/2018 office supplies for qcc $223.66 3392010917 10/03/2018 POSTER PAPER FOR QCC $45.77 3393623947 10/19/2018 Office Supplies- Cherry colored paper $126.35 3393623944 10/19/2018 Office supplies $28.33 3393479824 10/17/2018 General and office supplies $241.98 3393843166 10/20/2018 Office supplies $181.81 717948 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable State Disbursement Unit $276.92 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 0100 - Child Support $276.92 717949 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Strategic Economics Inc $7,536.25 Invoice Date Description Amount 1816.03 09/28/2018 Economic Feasibility of Inclusionary Housing Policy 2018/09 $7,536.25 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 9 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 38 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717950 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUPPLYWORKS $386.06 Invoice Date Description Amount 460387939 10/17/2018 Facilities-Park Bathrooms: Janitorial Supplies $386.06 717951 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable U S HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL GROUP PC $28.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 3413872-CA 10/12/2018 TB Test- KAJTAZ $28.00 717952 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable VALLEY OIL COMPANY $8,285.17 Invoice Date Description Amount 946858 10/23/2018 Clear Diesel Fuel $8,285.17 717953 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable VAN METER WILLIAMS POLLACK LLP $780.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1816-201809 09/30/2018 Westport #864 Design Review 2018/09 $780.00 717954 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SVCS AGENCY $29,480.75 Invoice Date Description Amount WVCS VV Q1FY1819 10/23/2018 CDBG Capital Housing WVCS VV Q1 FY18-19 $29,480.75 717955 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC $253.10 Invoice Date Description Amount 72787H 10/10/2018 Facilities-City Hall: Flourescent Lamp $253.10 717956 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Alamdar, Ali $8,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 212443 10/24/2018 21912 Gardenview Ln - Encroachment Bond - #212443 $8,000.00 717957 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Attia, Maged $4,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 217362 10/24/2018 10424 Sterling Blvd - Encroachment Bond - #217362 $4,000.00 717958 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Bains, Kulvinder $8,200.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 203870 10/24/2018 10265 Judy Ave - Encroachment Bond - #203870 $8,200.00 717959 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Barron Builders Inc. $5,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount RefundB2017-0741 10/29/2018 TCO Refund 20525 Mariani Blvd. - B-2017-0741 $5,000.00 717960 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Chang, Sue-Fay $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 143 10/22/2018 Refund for Cupertino Room security deposit, 10.17.18, P#R143 $500.00 717961 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Commisso, Anne $350.00 Invoice Date Description Amount RCCertCommisso 10/31/2018 Reimbursement - Lifeguard Cert. for BBF employee Sophia Commisso $350.00 717962 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Cupertino Bhubaneswar Sister City $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 251 10/22/2018 Refund for Community Hall security deposit, 10.15.18, P#R251 $500.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 10 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 39 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717963 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Dooley, Eileen $100.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 619 10/22/2018 Refund for Creekside Building security deposit, 10.13.18, P#R619 $100.00 717964 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Farran, Laurie $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499684 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $55.00 717965 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Frolich, Rosalyn $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499685 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $55.00 717966 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hill, Robert $116,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 214058214059 10/24/2018 10679 Santa Lucia Rd- Grdng Misc Dpst (214058)/Grdng Bond(214059) $116,000.00 717967 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Holiday Lights Bay Area $6,175.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2338 10/26/2018 Deposit for Quinlan Holiday lights $6,175.00 717968 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Huber, Jeannette $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499686 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $55.00 717969 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Malaun, Sara $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499688 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $55.00 717970 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Malaun, Sara $15.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499689 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $15.00 717971 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Morton, Jeff $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 122 10/22/2018 Refund for Cupertino Room security deposit, 10.18.18, P#R122 $500.00 717972 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Namokar Corporation $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 144 10/22/2018 Refund for Social Room security deposit, 10.16.18, P#R144 $300.00 717973 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Ramelli, Carole $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499687 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $55.00 717974 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Spitsen, Paul $132.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499691 10/31/2018 Senior Center Refunds 10/24-10/31/18 $132.00 717975 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Suresh, Sivaprakasam $19,500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 212760 10/24/2018 21030 Gardena Dr - Encroachment Bond - #212760 $19,500.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 11 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 40 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717976 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Ueno, Tatsuya $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 149 10/22/2018 Refund for Social Room security deposit, 10.15.18, P#R149 $300.00 717977 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Zume Pizza, INC $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7786 10/25/2018 ZUME PIZZA Inv#7786 Refund $144.00 Type Check Totals:115 Transactions $681,322.92 EFT 28064 11/01/2018 Open Accounts Payable STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $5,245.00 Invoice Date Description Amount QTR3- 2018 10/01/2018 SR GH 026-818149 Sales/Use Tax July'18-Sep'18 $5,245.00 28067 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ACENAS, ALEX $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount AlexA101318 10/13/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement, 9.14.18 to 10.13.18 $55.00 28068 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable BAZ INDUSTRIES, INC $1,760,294.46 Invoice Date Description Amount QTR3-2018 10/01/2018 Apple Consulting July 2018 - June 2019 $1,760,294.46 28069 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable COLLEEN FERRIS $45.20 Invoice Date Description Amount ColleenF10112018 10/11/2018 reimbursement for cell phone CF 12/12-10/11 $45.20 28070 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable Eflex Group, Inc $4,574.06 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 4700 - *FSA Employee Health*$4,574.06 28071 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GOLDFARB & LIPMAN $4,526.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 128389 09/25/2018 Westport Legal Services 2018/08 $1,572.00 128641 10/18/2018 Legal Services for Aviare Apt 2018/09 $2,568.00 128639 10/18/2018 Housing Legal Services 2018/09 $386.00 28072 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRACE DUVAL $384.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 Zumba Instruction (9.7-10.26) 13 Participants $384.80 28073 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable GULU SAKHRANI $717.81 Invoice Date Description Amount GuluS103018 10/30/2018 Travel Reimbursement for CACEO Conf 2018 10/9- 10/11 Gulu S. $717.81 28074 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable ICMA Retirement Trust-457 $954.73 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 3100 - *ICMA Deferred Comp*$954.73 28075 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable LAW OFFICES OF BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN $241.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 232033 09/28/2018 Legal Services Marina Plaza #400 2018/08 $103.50 232036 09/28/2018 De Anza Hotel #851 Legal Fees 2018/08 $138.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 12 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 41 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 28076 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable LIFETIME TENNIS INC $271,974.99 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 payment 2 $271,974.99 28077 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOSLEY, CHAD , E $25.00 Invoice Date Description Amount ChadM101818 10/18/2018 MPWO Meeting 10-18-2018 $25.00 28078 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable National Deferred (ROTH)$3,345.77 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 3010 - Nationwide Roth $3,345.77 28079 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable National Deferred Compensatin $29,457.86 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 3000 - *Nationwide Deferred Compensatio $29,457.86 28080 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable NICK ALVAREZ $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount NickA102518 10/10/2018 Cell Phone Service Reimbursement; 9.11.18-10.10.18 $55.00 28081 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable OH, JENNIFER $80.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 10/30/2018 Nutrition Made Easy Instruction 4 students $80.00 28082 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable PARS/City of Cupertino $4,516.19 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 3321 - PARS Employee *$4,516.19 28083 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable PROFESSIONAL TURF MGMNT INC $17,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 866 10/22/2018 Golf Course Maintenance $17,000.00 28084 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable REBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY $3,484.34 Invoice Date Description Amount RTSVQ1FY1819 10/23/2018 CDBG Capital Housing Repair Q1 $3,484.34 28085 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable RICHARD WONG $205.10 Invoice Date Description Amount Wong102018 10/25/2018 Lyft for all attendees CALPERS Edu Forum $205.10 28086 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SAVANT SOLUTIONS $6,387.50 Invoice Date Description Amount SS-0175 10/23/2018 Simplivity Professional Services $6,387.50 28087 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable SLAB HAPPY CERAMICS $2,923.05 Invoice Date Description Amount BurneyFall2018-1 10/30/2018 BurneyFall2018-1 $2,923.05 28088 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable TIMM BORDEN $36.00 Invoice Date Description Amount TimmB10012018 10/01/2018 Parking at SJC for NACTO conference in LA Oct. 1-2, 2018 $36.00 28089 11/02/2018 Open Accounts Payable TWISTERS SPORTS $17,273.28 Invoice Date Description Amount 102918 10/29/2018 Fall Payment 1 $17,273.28 Type EFT Totals:24 Transactions $2,133,802.64 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 13 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 42 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 115 $681,322.92 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 115 $681,322.92 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 24 $2,133,802.64 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 24 $2,133,802.64 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 139 $2,815,125.56 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 139 $2,815,125.56 $0.00 Grand Totals: Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 115 $681,322.92 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 115 $681,322.92 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 24 $2,133,802.64 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 24 $2,133,802.64 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 139 $2,815,125.56 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 139 $2,815,125.56 $0.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 14 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 10/27/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/2/2018 43 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4856 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/10/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 09, 2018 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 09, 2018 Adopt Resolution No. 19-014 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 09, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™44 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING November 9, 2018 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Zach Korach, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor, City of Cupertino 45 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Main Account - Main Checking Account Check 717978 11/06/2018 Open Accounts Payable RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO $205.00 Invoice Date Description Amount DiegoR050318 03/09/2018 Trees: Spray License $140.00 DiegoR042618 04/26/2018 Trees: Certified Tree Worker Recertification $65.00 717979 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL $1,850.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1208 11/02/2018 Memorial Park Goose Control for October 2018 $1,850.00 717980 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable 4LEAF INC $2,720.00 Invoice Date Description Amount J1181PP 10/22/2018 Building On-Call Inspection September 2018 $2,720.00 717981 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable A T & T $121.02 Invoice Date Description Amount 5558-10282018 10/28/2018 9607317142 555 8 10/28/18 - 11/27/18 $121.02 717982 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable AdTaxi | Bay Area News Group $604.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 0001158004 10/31/2018 Advertising and Legal $604.00 717983 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ADVANTAGE GRAFIX $2,417.62 Invoice Date Description Amount 42399 10/12/2018 Business Cards Toan Quach and Iqraam Nabi $106.82 42167 08/31/2018 BAAG & CIP $2,310.80 717984 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALDANA, JOSE, B.$135.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2954 10/06/2018 Demod Cable $135.00 717985 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES $11,995.02 Invoice Date Description Amount 57219 10/25/2018 Crossing Guard Svcs 10/7-10/20/18 $11,995.02 717986 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALMADEN VALLEY PRINTING CO INC $5,555.44 Invoice Date Description Amount 26945 10/10/2018 Tree Badges with QR Code $5,555.44 717987 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable AMAZON WEB SERVICES INC $326.59 Invoice Date Description Amount 155126764 11/03/2018 Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Oct 2018 $326.59 717988 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION $825.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 316316-18107 10/19/2018 2019 APA renewal for Ellen Yau $448.00 109688-18107 10/19/2018 2019 APA membership for Aarti Shrivastava $377.00 717989 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $120.00 Invoice Date Description Amount I500-00379561 10/22/2018 Haz Mat $120.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 1 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 46 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 717990 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable BENCH, MICHAEL , L $1,800.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 18 087C 10/08/2018 Vallco Town Center SB35 #852 Arborist 2018/09 $1,800.00 717991 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES INC $925.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 74976 10/05/2018 Stevens Creek Bridge Funding App Bridge 37C0011 Sep. 2018 $925.00 717992 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable BRUCE'S TIRE INC $129.95 Invoice Date Description Amount 11-25263 11/01/2018 Alignment for Dually Truck/4WD $129.95 717993 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE $47,776.17 Invoice Date Description Amount 09212018 09/21/2018 5926633333 08/18/18 - 9/18/18 $34,766.41 10172018 10/17/2018 5926633333 9/19/18 - 10/16/18 $13,009.76 717994 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable CINTAS CORPORATION $953.52 Invoice Date Description Amount 630552509 10/30/2018 Uniforms / Safety Apparel $453.66 630555989 11/06/2018 Uniforms/Safety Apparel $499.86 717995 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable CITY OF SAN JOSE $38,084.44 Invoice Date Description Amount 1161614 10/24/2018 Animal Care Services for Sept & Oct 2018 $38,084.44 717996 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST $284.81 Invoice Date Description Amount 1232-10232018 10/23/2018 8155100050011232 11/01/18-11/30/18 $284.81 717997 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable CSG CONSULTANTS INC $36,722.10 Invoice Date Description Amount B1832 08/27/2018 Building Record Archive Scanning August 2018 $920.35 B1831 08/27/2018 Building Record Archive Scanning August2018 $109.20 B1845 10/18/2018 Building Record Archive Scanning October 2018 $6,353.70 B1844 10/17/2018 Building Record Archive Scanning October 2018 $908.85 21220 10/29/2018 SO1 McClellan Road Sidewalk Improv-Ph 2, Sept 2018 $28,430.00 717998 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable CURREN CONSULTING $2,887.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 2018-10-04 10/31/2018 2017 Pave Maint Project Phase I, II & III $2,887.50 717999 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable DAVID J POWERS & ASSOCIATES $73,606.13 Invoice Date Description Amount 22935 10/25/2018 Vallco #805 Specific Plan EIR 2018/09 $73,606.13 718000 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable DCSE, INC $900.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 9 10/31/2018 Digitization, Parcel, Lot Line $900.00 718001 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable DOLPHIN DESIGN INC $2,160.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 30516 11/01/2018 Library Aquarium Service for November 2018 $2,160.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 2 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 47 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718002 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS INC $10,050.74 Invoice Date Description Amount 171128-10 09/30/2018 Vallco #805 Specific Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis 2018/09 $10,050.74 718003 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable EWING IRRIGATION $2,301.07 Invoice Date Description Amount 6462960 11/02/2018 Grounds-Sports Fields: Ath Wht Pnt $2,301.07 718004 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable FLINT TRADING COMPANY $684.35 Invoice Date Description Amount 228908 10/23/2018 Repair Kit, Shrink Sleeve, Pressure Regulators, Igniters, etc. $684.35 718005 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable FU, BENJAMIN $845.55 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/8 to 10/10/18 11/06/2018 APA conference, San Diego $845.55 718006 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY $80,420.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2, 2017-19.02 11/01/2018 CM Services Oct. 2018 CTYCU001_J05934.200_201810-J586 $12,045.00 22, 2015-21.01 11/01/2018 CM Services Oct. 2018 CTYCU001_J05934.100_201810-J560 $68,375.00 718007 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Guerra Construction Group $236,573.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 1-2015-19 10/31/2018 McClellan Road Sidewalk Improvements Payment 1 $236,573.75 718008 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hartford Life Insurance $10,843.20 Invoice Date Description Amount 656451581480 11/07/2018 November 2018 Life and AD&D Benefit $10,843.20 718009 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hartford-Priority Accts $529.37 Invoice Date Description Amount 755357094337 11/07/2018 November 2018 $529.37 718010 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Health Care Dental Trust $29,159.40 Invoice Date Description Amount November2018 11/07/2018 November 2018 Dental Benefit $29,159.40 718011 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable HOMESTEAD 76 $58.97 Invoice Date Description Amount 20181101 11/01/2018 Car Wash $58.97 718012 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable IMPEC GROUP (CLEAN INNOVATION) $61,289.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 1811106 11/01/2018 November 2018 Janitorial Services $60,889.16 1810513 10/31/2018 Facilities: Special Job Fee - BBF Shack Bar $400.00 718013 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable INSERV COMPANY $350.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 60260 10/19/2018 Community Hall Water Testing $350.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 3 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 48 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718014 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF SAN JOSE INC. $657.13 Invoice Date Description Amount 10281464 11/02/2018 Batteries $162.80 10281465 11/02/2018 Batteries $494.33 718015 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMNT $2,111.67 Invoice Date Description Amount AHFA636 10/31/2018 Contract Services- 11/01/2018 - 11/30/2018 City Attorney Office $212.09 AHCT855 10/31/2018 Document Storage November 2018 $1,899.58 718016 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION INC $146,924.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 12-224 10/30/2018 Progress Payment 1 Reconstruction Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk $146,924.16 718017 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable JEREMY DAVID SUTTON $1,125.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2018-11-08-01 11/08/2018 Live Artist for Tree Lighting Event $1,125.00 718018 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable John Cahalan Landscape Architect $8,838.25 Invoice Date Description Amount 2019-009 10/25/2018 DeAnza Blvd. Medians Landscape Improvements Phase 1/Inv 12 $1,781.25 1, 2019-04 10/25/2018 DeAnza Blvd. Medians Phase 2 Lndscp/Improv Inv. #1 9/15-10/24/18 $7,057.00 718019 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable KIMBALL-MIDWEST $257.10 Invoice Date Description Amount 6701150 10/25/2018 Misc General Supplies $257.10 718020 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable KNORR SYSTEMS INC $755.06 Invoice Date Description Amount PWSVI-4018 10/25/2018 Facilities: Install EPD Cylinders at BBF $755.06 718021 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Life Insurance Company of North America $13,172.76 Invoice Date Description Amount 183053-CIGNA 11/07/2018 November 2018 CIGNA $13,172.76 718022 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable LIVE OAK ADULT DAY SERVICES $5,334.29 Invoice Date Description Amount Live Oak CDBG Q1 10/02/2018 Live Oak Q1 CDBG Public Services $5,334.29 718023 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable MAHAN AND SONS INC $1,400.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1635 10/30/2018 Varian Park Orchard Oct 2018 Maintenance $1,400.00 718024 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable MAIL FINANCE $207.46 Invoice Date Description Amount N7379385 10/10/2018 Contract Services- Lease Payment $207.46 718025 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable MAITRI INC $6,695.71 Invoice Date Description Amount MTHQ1FY1819 10/09/2018 Q1 Maitri HSG $6,695.71 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 4 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 49 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718026 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Maletis-Massey, Lisa $47.05 Invoice Date Description Amount Lisamm102418 10/24/2018 Lisamm102418 Phone Reimburse $47.05 718027 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Managed Health Network Inc $733.30 Invoice Date Description Amount PRM-030536 11/07/2018 November 2018 EAP BNEFIT $733.30 718028 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable MEIR, ERIKA $268.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 110618 11/06/2018 Yoga Foundations Instruction (9.6-11.1) 7 Students $268.80 718029 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CENTER $1,286.44 Invoice Date Description Amount 96652 10/27/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Planter Mix $352.83 96759 11/03/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Noiyo 1 1/2"$454.37 96760 11/03/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Fabric 3/50 $24.87 96756 11/03/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Noiyo 1 1/2" for Quinlan $302.91 96762 11/03/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Noiyo 1 1/2" for Quinlan $151.46 718030 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable NAPA Auto Parts $533.47 Invoice Date Description Amount 558711 11/05/2018 Synthetic Bay Box $93.75 558712 11/05/2018 Misc Auto Parts & Supplies $439.72 718031 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC $79.04 Invoice Date Description Amount 8101257125 11/01/2018 Satellite Phone Services for CM 10/1/18 - 10/31/18 $79.04 718032 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $318.02 Invoice Date Description Amount 2591-364849 10/31/2018 Oil Filter $21.71 2591-365896 11/05/2018 Air Filter $106.77 2591-365319 11/02/2018 Capsule for Truck $22.21 2591-366047 11/06/2018 Fuel Filter $167.33 718033 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ORCHARD BUSINESS $16.21 Invoice Date Description Amount OSH101718 10/17/2018 8665 CC Charges $16.21 718034 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC $16,239.62 Invoice Date Description Amount 1715-102218 10/22/2018 4993063171-5 09/15/18-10/16/18 $16,239.62 718035 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable PACKET FUSION, INC $93,288.85 Invoice Date Description Amount PB12067 10/15/2018 VoIP Equipment and Labor $93,288.85 718036 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable PG&E $1,082.87 Invoice Date Description Amount 4212-10292018 10/29/2018 3535370421-2 09/21/18-10/22/18 $69.51 0349-102518 10/25/2018 3042033034-9 09/20/18-10/19/18 $170.68 9785-102918 10/29/2018 2016881978-5 09/20/18-10/21/18 $10.76 6480-103118 10/31/2018 5587684648-0 09/25/18-10/24/18 $831.92 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 5 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 50 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718037 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable PLACEWORKS, INC $3,613.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 66779 09/30/2018 Westport #864 IS/MND 2018/09 $2,610.32 66778 09/30/2018 De Anza Hotel #851 Env Svc 2018/09 $1,003.43 718038 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Quench USA, Inc $2.25 Invoice Date Description Amount INV01365893b 07/30/2018 tax for invoice INV01365893 $2.25 718039 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable RONALD D OLDS $462.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 5234 11/04/2018 Camera #7; network switch; tripod spreader $462.50 718040 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO INC $1,926.80 Invoice Date Description Amount I13964 10/31/2018 Grounds: Dumor Parts - Armrest and hardware $1,926.80 718041 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SABRE BACKFLOW INC $258.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 659 10/31/2018 Trees & ROW: Calibration Model 835, Filter, Gastket, etc $258.16 718042 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SABRO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.$480.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2252-C 11/01/2018 Run RG6 Coax & one Cat 6 Cable in Community Hall $480.00 718043 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SAFETY COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT INC $1,095.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 00009541 10/31/2018 Loader Training on 10/17/18 $1,095.00 718044 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SAN FRANCISCO OPERA $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1-016 07/27/2018 It's A Wonderful Life Dress Rehearsal 11/15/18 $300.00 718045 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY $85,456.86 Invoice Date Description Amount 0003-10252018 10/25/2018 Case Management Client water bill $182.72 Import - 54097 10/22/2018 0063820000-6 - Janice Av.LS $68.39 Import - 54098 10/22/2018 0067500000-4 - Oro Grande PL LS $300.88 Import - 54099 10/22/2018 0068410000-1 - 22221 McClellan 8302 $526.92 Import - 54100 10/22/2018 0134100000-6 - 8303 Memorial Park $3,735.50 Import - 54103 10/22/2018 0345710000-0 - Alderbrook Ln.FS $77.86 Import - 54104 10/19/2018 0573900000-7 - 22120 Stevens Creek Blvd $50.38 Import - 54105 10/22/2018 0677310000-0 - 10300 Torre Ave LS (Comm.Hall)$1,316.20 Import - 54106 10/26/2018 0879200000-5 - Stelling Rd. LS $472.03 Import - 54107 10/22/2018 1198300000-8 - 21979 San Fernando Ave. 6620 $140.14 Import - 54108 10/22/2018 1250520000-1 - 6620 Blackberry/Snack $733.93 Import - 54109 10/22/2018 1332100000-5 - Hyde Avenue $2,953.61 Import - 54110 10/22/2018 1393820000-6 - Irrig SC/Stelling LS (Stev Crk Blvd)$84.73 Import - 54111 10/22/2018 1444810000-9 - Hyannisport Dr. LS $3,354.95 Import - 54113 10/29/2018 1670900000-0 - Stelling Rd. LS $276.88 Import - 54114 10/26/2018 1731610000-1 - De Anza Blvd.S.$431.80 Import - 54115 10/22/2018 1735700000-3 - 8303 Memorial Park Restroom $156.50 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 6 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 51 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Import - 54116 10/22/2018 1787904559-3 - 22221 McClellan 8302 $462.54 Import - 54117 10/22/2018 1832500000-0 - Ruppell PL LS $2,482.50 Import - 54118 10/22/2018 1836700000-9 - 8322 Mary Mini Park $167.39 Import - 54119 10/22/2018 1987700000-0 - Alderbrook Ln LS $5,612.86 Import - 54120 10/22/2018 2228610000-7 - 21111 Stevens Crk LS $472.45 Import - 54121 10/22/2018 2243500000-9 - 10300 Ainsworth Dr.LS $3,087.24 Import - 54122 10/22/2018 2286120000-8 - 21251 Stevens Creek Blvd $48.84 Import-54123 10/22/2018 2288800000-1 - 8306 Somerset Park (Strokes ave)$630.42 Import - 54125 10/22/2018 2649300000-9 - 10300 Torre Ave. FS (Comm.Hall)$77.86 Import - 54126 10/22/2018 2892070144-9 - 22221 McClellan 8320 $97.69 Import - 54127 10/22/2018 2958510000-0 - 10555 Mary Ave.$111.95 Import - 54128 10/22/2018 2974010000-2 - 21251 Stevens Creek Blvd $706.68 Import - 54129 10/22/2018 2984810000-3 - 8504 Alves and Stelling $270.88 Import - 54130 10/29/2018 3156700000-0 - Prospect Rd.LS $237.83 Import - 54131 10/22/2018 3207400000-4 - 21710 McClellan 8312 $4,029.67 Import - 54132 10/22/2018 3296700000-4 - Irrig SC/Stelling LS (Stev Crk Blvd)$90.16 Import - 54134 10/22/2018 3430520000-4 - 21111 Stev. Crk Blvd Teen Ctr $33.00 Import - 54135 10/22/2018 3530520000-4 - 21111 Stev.Crk Blvd 8510 $276.02 Import - 54136 10/22/2018 3612707315-7 - Stocklmeir Ct $2,008.64 Import - 54137 10/22/2018 3673220000-5 - Stev.Crk/Cupertino Rd.$275.38 Import - 54138 10/19/2018 3688120000-4 - Mary Ave Footbridge $82.36 Import - 54140 10/22/2018 3746710000-6 - 21111 Stev.Crk BL FS $73.28 Import - 54141 10/22/2018 3841010000-2 - 8507 Monta Vista Park $210.97 Import - 54142 10/22/2018 3856110000-9 - 8322 Stella Estates $41.18 Import - 54143 10/22/2018 3857710000-1 - 8322 Foothill/Cupertino Rd $217.40 Import - 54144 10/19/2018 3872100000-8 - Park Canyon Oak Wy $407.58 Import - 54145 10/22/2018 3900520000-9 - 10300 Torre Ave $488.04 Import - 54146 10/22/2018 4012210000-7 - 22601 Voss Av 8304 $3,248.39 Import - 54147 10/22/2018 4103020000-4 - 6620 Blackberry/Snack $494.24 Import - 54148 10/22/2018 4227520000-6 - 8303 Memorial Park $864.67 Import - 54149 10/26/2018 4242600000-8 - Irrigation-Median (Bollinger Rd)$88.43 Import - 54150 10/29/2018 4676110000-0 - Rainbow Dr.LS $237.83 Import - 54151 10/19/2018 5022148584-5 - 10301 Byrne Ave $80.31 Import - 54152 10/22/2018 5122900000-8 - Portable Meter $266.41 Import - 54153 10/22/2018 5237400000-9 - Dumas Dr, LS $5,532.41 Import - 54156 10/26/2018 5461910000-8 - De Anza Blvd.S.$351.41 Import - 54158 10/26/2018 5676310000-7 - Creekline Dr.$174.06 Import - 54159 10/22/2018 5778910000-5 - 8504 Quinlan Ln.FS $48.84 Import - 54160 10/22/2018 5835000000-4 - 8322 Stelling/Alves $102.99 Import - 54162 10/22/2018 5948100000-4 - Emerg Irrig/Golf $6,203.05 Import - 54163 10/22/2018 5986710000-6 - 10300 Torre Ave. FS (Comm.Hall)$298.44 Import - 54164 10/22/2018 5997110000-9 - 7555 Barnhart Pl $4,061.62 Import - 54165 10/22/2018 6292600000-1 - 10800 Torre Ave LS $2,475.92 Import - 54166 10/22/2018 6296810000-8 - 8322 Stev.Crk Bl median $106.50 Import - 54167 10/22/2018 6405210000-1 - 8506 McClellan Ranch $79.28 Import - 54168 10/22/2018 6578520000-0 - 8322 Foothill/Alpine LS $81.24 Import - 54169 10/22/2018 6730700000-9 - 21975 San Fernando Av $536.88 Import - 54170 10/29/2018 6756510000-4 - Yorkshire Dr.LS $6,297.95 Import - 54171 10/22/2018 6788620000-4 - 10555 Mary Ave. 8503 $167.39 Import - 54172 10/19/2018 6875120000-4 - 21979 San Fernando Av $226.69 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 7 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 52 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Import - 54173 10/22/2018 6907100000-9 - Alderbrook Ln $127.25 Import - 54174 10/22/2018 6935200000-9 - 8303 Memorial Park $3,691.92 Import - 54175 10/22/2018 6973320000-5 - 8301 Linda Vista PK1 $777.50 Import - 54176 10/22/2018 7036000000-7 - 85 Stev.Crk/Mary LS $108.45 Import - 54177 10/29/2018 7038819286-9 - 22050 Stevens Creek Bl $57.92 Import - 54178 10/22/2018 7054200000-8 - 8322 Phar Lap LS $57.83 Import - 54179 10/19/2018 7112900000-7 - Oak Valley Rd $174.93 Import - 54180 10/22/2018 7495200000-3 - 10300 Torre Ave FS $77.86 Import - 54181 10/19/2018 7523510000-7 - Oak Valley Road LS $196.72 Import - 54182 10/22/2018 7630410000-1 - Salem Av.LS $380.82 Import - 54184 10/29/2018 7808300000-6 - Irrigation-Median (Westlynn Wy)$157.40 Import - 54185 10/22/2018 7930000000-1 - 8322 Stelling/Christensen Dr.$97.53 Import - 54186 10/22/2018 8006810000-9 - 10450 Mann Dr $25.19 Import - 54187 10/22/2018 8065700000-8 - Peninsula and Fitzgerald Is $30.59 Import - 54189 10/22/2018 8270010000-9 - Janice Ave.LS $265.45 Import - 54190 10/22/2018 8287220000-9 - 8322 Stevens Cr/San Antonio Ls $84.73 Import - 54191 10/22/2018 8427420000-9 - 8322 Foothill/Vista Knoll $435.29 Import - 54192 10/22/2018 8549600000-2 - Bubb Rd.LS $2,665.50 Import - 54193 10/22/2018 8605220000-2 - Stev.Crk/Orange LS $41.18 Import - 54194 10/22/2018 8647520000-1 - 10555 Mary Ave/Corp Yard FS $122.12 Import - 54195 10/22/2018 8755010000-9 - 10455 Miller Ave/Creekside $258.25 Import - 54196 10/22/2018 8879620000-9 - 8504 Christensen Dr $227.30 Import - 54197 10/22/2018 8886800000-6 - 8301 Linda Vista PK2 $755.72 Import - 54198 10/19/2018 9118810000-1 - 21121 Stevens Ck Bl Ls $244.16 Import - 54200 10/22/2018 9377600000-7 - 8307 Varian Park $2,172.08 Import - 54202 10/29/2018 9511610000-9 - Donegal Dr.$54.33 Import - 54203 10/19/2018 9584020000-0 - Byrne Ave - Irrigation $1,269.87 Import - 54205 10/26/2018 9705420000-7 - 10300 Torre Avenue Ls $1,034.88 Import - 54206 10/22/2018 9785210000-3 - 8322 Stev.Crk BL median $41.18 Import - 54207 10/22/2018 9824500000-9 - 8322 Irrig SC/Stelling $233.73 718046 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE $2,603.38 Invoice Date Description Amount SALAQ1FY1819 10/26/2018 HSG SALA Q1 FY 18-19 $2,603.38 718047 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SSA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC $7,305.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 6277 10/26/2018 McClellan Ranch West Lot Improvements from 9/26/18 to 10/25/18 $7,305.50 718048 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE $335.49 Invoice Date Description Amount 3392777153 10/07/2018 Credit - office supplies for qcc ($232.89) 3393623946 10/19/2018 paper for qcc $43.03 3393623945 10/19/2018 Paper for qcc ($43.03) 3392777154 10/07/2018 Credit - office supplies qcc ($23.64) 3393479825 10/17/2018 Office Supplies for qcc $394.80 3394034221 10/24/2018 Credit - paper qcc ($43.03) 3394269198 10/26/2018 Coffee supplies $38.12 3393843167 10/20/2018 Copy paper and labels $202.13 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 8 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 53 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718049 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable STATE OF CALIFORNIA $230.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 58661 11/06/2018 Civil Engineer License Renewal for David Stillman $115.00 45512 11/06/2018 Civil Engineer License Renewal for Timm Borden $115.00 718050 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable STUDIOS ARCHITECTURE $600.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 0112030 10/18/2018 De Anza Hotel #851 Design Review 2018/09 $600.00 718051 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUE AND KATHY LINE DANCE $1,917.60 Invoice Date Description Amount 110618 11/06/2018 Line Dance Instruction (9.4-10.23 + 9.6-11.1) 29+18 Students $1,917.60 718052 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUNNYVALE FORD $457.71 Invoice Date Description Amount 135298 11/05/2018 Element (Auto Part) $228.90 135424 11/06/2018 Replacement Key $228.81 718053 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC.$785.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2571531 09/21/2018 Motion Picture Rental $435.00 2567448 09/14/2018 Motion Picture Rental $350.00 718054 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable THE CALIFORNIA CHANNEL $253.34 Invoice Date Description Amount 19282 11/01/2018 California Channel (November 2018)$253.34 718055 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable THERMAL MECHANICAL, INC.$29,674.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 74492 10/31/2018 Replaced AC Unit in Server Closet as Quoted $29,674.00 718056 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable TRAFFIC DATA SERVICE LLC $38,480.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 18134 11/02/2018 Bike Counts, Traffic Vehicle Counts $38,480.00 718057 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable TRAVLN TOYS, INC. $17,508.30 Invoice Date Description Amount 01-2063 10/31/2018 Dump Trailer for Trees & Rows $17,508.30 718058 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable TREESTUFF.COM $569.42 Invoice Date Description Amount INV-433686 10/25/2018 Trees & Row: Gloves, Poles, Best Mgmt Practices documents $569.42 718059 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable US BANK-PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM $71,414.94 Invoice Date Description Amount JuliaK101518 10/15/2018 0918 CC Charges $1,570.28 JeffO101518 10/15/2018 CC Charges 0459 $464.67 ShawnT101518 10/15/2018 0179 CC Purchases $1,465.06 JasonF101518 10/15/2018 0161 CC Charges $164.60 CliffM101518 10/15/2018 0112 CC Charges $1,408.57 Bethe101518 10/15/2018 CC charges 5593 $960.72 ElizabethS101518 10/15/2018 0862 CC Charges $5,405.00 ColleenF101518 10/15/2018 0798 CC charges $99.71 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 9 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 54 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference AS10152018 10/15/2018 0890 CC Charges $121.31 AlexC101518 10/15/2018 0400CCCharges $3,380.70 AmandaH101518 10/15/2018 9326 CC Charges $113.88 KarenL101518 10/15/2018 8993 CC Charges $57.39 BrianG101518 10/15/2018 6202 CC Charges $259.55 TyB101518 10/15/2018 3195 CC Charges $1,039.97 RudyL101518 10/15/2018 8736 CC Charges $1,772.13 RobertG101518 10/15/2018 6980 CC Charges $59.52 karengo101518 10/15/2018 0882 CC Charges $336.41 BillM101518 10/15/2018 6500 CC Charges $4,867.73 JasonG101518 10/15/2018 2795 CC Charges $707.85 BillB101518 10/15/2018 5247 CC Charges $1,049.04 IsaacP101518 10/15/2018 0125 CC Charges $339.66 DomingoS101518 10/15/2018 7167 CC Charges $366.17 CarlV101518 10/15/2018 6520 CC Charges $837.24 ReiD101518 10/15/2018 9254CCCharges $3,705.17 BarbaraB101518 10/15/2018 8712CCCharges $509.10 MikeL101518 10/15/2018 9433 CC Charges $2,528.19 KeithW101518 10/15/2018 8803 CC Charges $50.58 AndrewS101518 10/15/2018 9993 CC Charges $385.14 CesarG101518 10/15/2018 9076 CC Charges $1,362.20 Claref101518 10/15/2018 0078 CC Charges $801.74 BrianB101518 10/15/2018 4195 CC Charges $2,323.59 ChristineH101518 10/15/2018 5957CC Charges $915.63 JeffM101518 10/15/2018 4203 CC Charges $838.15 KevinK101518 10/15/2018 8746 CC Charges $568.14 KimC101518 10/15/2018 8696 CC Charges $175.40 JennyK101518 10/15/2018 8829CCCharges $1,279.95 LauraL101518 10/15/2018 8688 CC Charges $1,482.92 Rachell101518 10/15/2018 8269 CC Charges $4,540.89 MarcL101518 10/15/2018 0138 CC Charges $339.43 AlbertS101518 10/15/2018 7270 CC Charges $546.35 KelseyH101518 10/15/2018 1679CCCharges $97.91 RobertD101518 10/15/2018 2557 CC Charges $214.19 PeggyF101518 10/15/2018 0924 CC Charges $864.84 UrsulaS101518 10/15/2018 2512 CC Charges $239.73 MariluM101518 10/15/2018 8795CCCharges $442.02 EmmaS101518 10/15/2018 1986 CC Charges $158.83 AndrewW101518 10/15/2018 1952 CC Charges $526.33 DanielM101518 10/15/2018 8787 CC Charges $162.95 KimF101518 10/15/2018 6867 CC Charges $2,895.15 ChyleneO101518 10/15/2018 5561 CC Charges $2,471.33 TimC101518 10/15/2018 6518CCCharges $348.40 JeffP101518 10/15/2018 3990CCCharges $26.68 JasonB101518 10/15/2018 2565 CC Charges $102.68 MollyJ101518 10/15/2018 5546 CC Charges $3,184.19 GraceS101518 10/15/2018 2958 CC Charges $1,982.27 MariaJ101518 10/15/2018 3859 CC Charges $8,311.16 KenE101518 10/15/2018 5954 CC Charges $186.55 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 10 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 55 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718060 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable VALLEY OIL COMPANY $1,633.64 Invoice Date Description Amount 43150 11/01/2018 Shell Rotella Diesel Lubrication $1,633.64 718061 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable VASANTHI BHAT $330.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 110618 11/06/2018 Hatha Yoga Instruction (9.6-11.1) 6 Students + 3 Flex Passes $330.80 718062 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Vision Service Plan (CA)$383.20 Invoice Date Description Amount Vision110718 11/07/2018 November 2018 Vision Benefit $383.20 718063 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Vision Service Plan (CA)$3,480.42 Invoice Date Description Amount VisionG1118 11/07/2018 November 2018 Vision Benefit- Glasses $3,480.42 718064 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable WENDEL ROSEN BLACK & DEAN LLP $7,533.72 Invoice Date Description Amount 2000173261 09/30/2018 Vallco Town Center SB35 #852 Legal Fees 2018/09 $7,533.72 718065 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SVCS AGENCY $20,997.57 Invoice Date Description Amount HH Q1F FY 18-19 10/15/2018 Haven Home Q1 FY 18-19 $11,246.69 CARE Q1 FY 18-19 10/15/2018 CDBG Capital Housing WVCS Q1 $9,750.88 718066 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable WESTMORELAND, EVAN $390.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 55 11/01/2018 AV Maintenance $390.00 718067 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable WHOLE BRAIN HEALTH INITIATIVE $231.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 110618 11/06/2018 Brain Club Instruction (9.17-10.29) 11 Students $231.00 718068 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Willkomm, Phillip $944.92 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/9 to 10/12 10/24/2018 CACEO Conference, Seaside $944.92 718069 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable YAU, ELLEN $334.66 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/8 to 10/10/18 11/06/2018 APA conference, San Diego $334.66 718070 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable ADSULE, ABHIJIT $445.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1447366 10/23/2018 QCC CLASS Check refunds for 10.23.18 - 11.05.18 $445.00 718071 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable AGRAWAL GROUP $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7794 11/05/2018 AGRAWAL GROUP Inv#7794 Refund $144.00 718072 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Ferro, Cheryl $80.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 649 10/15/2018 Refund PP rental on 11.3.18 P#-649 $80.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 11 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 56 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718073 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Frei-Jager, Barbara $118.93 Invoice Date Description Amount BarbaraF10/08/18 10/08/2018 SR2S Program Supplies $118.93 718074 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hom, Arnold $115.00 Invoice Date Description Amount ArnoldH10292018 10/31/2018 Civil Engineer Certificate Renewal $115.00 718075 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Kinst, Julia $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount R1884 11/02/2018 Refund Deposit - Bay Room - 10/29/18 - Permit #R1884 $300.00 718076 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Nguyen , Mayra, I $45.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1446545 10/11/2018 QCC Rental Refunds $45.00 718077 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable O'Sullivan, Paul $170.00 Invoice Date Description Amount PaulOS10222018 10/31/2018 ICC Certification Renewal $170.00 718078 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Persijn, Travis $86.00 Invoice Date Description Amount Refund11040123 11/05/2018 Refund 10200 N Tantau 11040123- no duplicate job card needed $86.00 718079 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Poveda, Ericka $864.98 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/8 to 10/10 10/25/2018 APA conference, San Diego $864.98 718080 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Rising Star Pathway $120.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 246 10/28/2018 Refund for hourly fees of Social room on 10.28.18 $120 $120.00 718081 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Salvador, Albert $1,397.50 Invoice Date Description Amount AlbertS10302018 10/31/2018 Conference Attendance $1,397.50 718082 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Serrano, Erick $350.76 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/8 to 10/10/18 11/06/2018 APA conference, San Diego $350.76 718083 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable Tsumura, Jeffrey $295.82 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/8 to 10/10/18 11/06/2018 APA conference, San Diego $295.82 Type Check Totals:106 Transactions $1,274,105.05 EFT 28090 11/05/2018 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT $39,008.63 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 CA - CA State Tax pp 10/13-10/26/18 $39,008.63 28091 11/05/2018 Open Accounts Payable IRS $126,982.20 Invoice Date Description Amount 10262018 10/26/2018 FED - Federal Tax pp 10/13-10/26/18 $126,982.20 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 12 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 57 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 28092 11/07/2018 Open Accounts Payable P E R S $354,025.74 Invoice Date Description Amount 102618 10/26/2018 CalPERS 10/13/18-10/26/18 $354,025.74 28093 11/08/2018 Open Accounts Payable California Public Employees' Retirement System $318,027.55 Invoice Date Description Amount 101518 10/15/2018 Health Premiums 11/2018 $318,027.55 28094 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable FIRE & RISK ALLIANCE, LLC $1,706.25 Invoice Date Description Amount 142-001-23 10/31/2018 AC2 #501 Plan Review 2018/10 $1,706.25 28095 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable GOLDFARB & LIPMAN $53,447.74 Invoice Date Description Amount 128390 09/25/2018 VSP #805 Legal Services 2018/08 $36,788.00 128640 10/18/2018 VSP #805 Legal Services 2018/09 $16,659.74 28096 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable GULU SAKHRANI $407.39 Invoice Date Description Amount GuluS110518 11/05/2018 Reimbursement for Travel/Hotel Women Leaders 10/21-10/23 $407.39 28097 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable HALL, DEBORAH KAY $714.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 110618 11/06/2018 Beading + Kumihimo Instruction (10.4-11.1) 9 + 15 Students $714.00 28098 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable LAW OFFICES OF BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN $118,653.37 Invoice Date Description Amount 232030 09/28/2018 VSP #805 Legal Services 2018/08 $78,165.44 233112 10/26/2018 Cupertino Village Hotel #812 Legal Fees 2018/09 $69.00 233111 10/26/2018 VSP #805 Legal Services 2018/09 $40,418.93 28099 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable LINDA RIOS $4,900.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1253 11/02/2018 Contract Services $4,900.00 28100 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable M-GROUP $8,927.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 1000413 07/31/2018 Vallco Town Center SB35 #852 Planning Consulting 2018/07 $5,725.00 1000606 09/30/2018 Vallco Town Center SB35 #852 Planning Consulting 2018/09 $3,202.50 28101 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable O'GRADY PAVING INC $3,221.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2930 10/31/2018 Dig Out & Repair Trench on Stvs Creek Blvd 11-20-17 $3,221.00 28102 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable PIU GHOSH $1,262.43 Invoice Date Description Amount 10/8 to 10/10 10/30/2018 APA conference, San Diego $1,262.43 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 13 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 58 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 28103 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP $34,123.41 Invoice Date Description Amount 257567 09/24/2018 VSP #805 Legal Services 2018/08 $34,123.41 28104 11/09/2018 Open Accounts Payable TIMM BORDEN $110.00 Invoice Date Description Amount TimmB102418 10/24/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement 9/25-10/24/18 $55.00 TimmB09242018 09/24/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement - 8.25.18-9.24.18 $55.00 Type EFT Totals:15 Transactions $1,065,517.21 Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 106 $1,274,105.05 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 106 $1,274,105.05 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 15 $1,065,517.21 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 15 $1,065,517.21 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 121 $2,339,622.26 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 121 $2,339,622.26 $0.00 Grand Totals: Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 106 $1,274,105.05 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 106 $1,274,105.05 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 15 $1,065,517.21 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 15 $1,065,517.21 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 121 $2,339,622.26 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 121 $2,339,622.26 $0.00 Tuesday, November 13, 2018Pages: 14 of 14user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/3/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/9/2018 59 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4857 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/10/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 16, 2018 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 16, 2018 Adopt Resolution No. 19-015 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 16, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™60 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING November 16, 2018 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Zach Korach, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor, City of Cupertino 61 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Main Account - Main Checking Account Check 718084 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ACTIVE NETWORK, INC $11,263.00 Invoice Date Description Amount CB2018Q2_0070 10/19/2018 ActiveNet Chargebacks or Disputed Transactions $1,838.00 1013417 10/31/2018 Remote Refresher; Go Live $9,425.00 718085 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALDANA, JOSE, B.$360.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2956 11/10/2018 AV Office Rack Project $360.00 718086 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC $142.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 951675 11/01/2018 PO Bond- Kristina $142.00 718087 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ANYA KROTH $174.63 Invoice Date Description Amount AK.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $174.63 718088 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ARBORPRO INC $11,800.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 61205 11/13/2018 GPS Inventory $11,800.00 718089 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ARTHUR HALL, LLC.$525.00 Invoice Date Description Amount B1018136B 11/13/2018 Trees & ROW: Bee Hive Removal Lomita Ave - 2nd Pmt $525.00 718090 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable BEAR ELECTRICALSOLUTIONS, INC. $45,950.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7095 10/30/2018 Streets: Cupertino SL-Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd $27,850.00 7125 10/31/2018 Streets: Homestead & De Anza Type 15 Foundation Install $5,200.00 7121 10/31/2018 Streets: Orange Ave Conduit and Streetlight Foundation $12,900.00 718091 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable BOETHING TREELAND FARMS INC $1,239.20 Invoice Date Description Amount SI-1175736 10/29/2018 Trees & ROW-Medians: Plants: Order #SO-1171204 $847.32 SI-1175744 10/29/2018 Trees & ROW: Street Trees, Orig Order SO-1171491 $391.88 718092 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable BRAD ALEXANDER $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount BradA110418 11/04/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 10.05.18-11.04.18 $55.00 718093 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable BRIGHTVIEW TREE COMPANY $670.35 Invoice Date Description Amount 6024223 10/25/2018 Trees & ROW: Street Trees; Sales Order 745613 $670.35 718094 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CALIF BUILDING OFFICIALS (CALBO) $418.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2376 10/08/2018 CALBO Website Job Ad.$418.00 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 1 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 62 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718095 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CAPITOL WHOLESALE NURSERY INC $459.94 Invoice Date Description Amount 46626 11/13/2018 Grounds-Sports Fields : Dymondia Marguerite Flat $459.94 718096 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CARL JECH $255.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 111318 11/13/2018 Humanities Instruction (9.25-11.13) 8 Students $255.00 718097 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CHAO YONG CHEN $660.00 Invoice Date Description Amount CC.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $660.00 718098 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CINTAS CORPORATION $514.06 Invoice Date Description Amount 630559413 11/13/2018 Uniforms/Safety Apparel $514.06 718099 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE INC $190,862.17 Invoice Date Description Amount PAY APP #7-Rev#1 11/08/2018 Progress Payment 7 Contract 2015-21.02 $190,862.17 718100 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Colonial Life & Accident Insurance $231.79 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 4800 - *Colonial Products - Pre-Tax*$231.79 718101 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST $300.84 Invoice Date Description Amount 2330-110118 11/01/2018 8155 10 005 0182330 11/12/18-12/09/18 $300.84 718102 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC $2,458.40 Invoice Date Description Amount 71580728 11/01/2018 CalNet Charges $2,458.40 718103 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES $2,535.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1640 10/31/2018 Project Coordination ShoreTel PBX System $2,535.00 718104 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Community Health Charities of California $257.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 4400 - Community Health Charities $257.00 718105 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CSG CONSULTANTS INC $202.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 21178 10/29/2018 Design Svs Mas Agreement Contract #2018-007 9/1- 9/28/18 $202.50 718106 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC $185.40 Invoice Date Description Amount 184059 10/22/2018 Grounds-Civic Center Maint: Pipe, Ratchet Cutter, etc.$164.12 184226 10/23/2018 Facilities-Park Bathrooms: Brass Spud $11.25 184236 10/23/2018 Facilities-Park Bathrooms: Brass Spud $6.93 184303 10/24/2018 Facilities-Park Bathrooms: Small Lavy Hanger $3.10 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 2 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 63 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718107 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CUSD $645.00 Invoice Date Description Amount AM18-00649 06/14/2018 Kennedy Waste Audit $645.00 718108 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DANCE FORCE LLC $1,968.20 Invoice Date Description Amount DF.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $1,968.20 718109 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DASHER TECHNOLOGIES, INC $74,630.83 Invoice Date Description Amount 342651 10/19/2018 Aruba Hardware for Campus Wireless LAN $74,630.83 718110 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DELL MARKETING L.P.$5,159.15 Invoice Date Description Amount 10276536972 11/06/2018 Mobile Precision 5530 $5,159.15 718111 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE $96.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 335867 11/05/2018 Fingerprint Apps $96.00 718112 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND COLLECTIONS $592.38 Invoice Date Description Amount 5551232 09/18/2018 984-02-005 Stevens Creek Blvd $592.38 718113 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DIGITAL PRINT $165.87 Invoice Date Description Amount 19853 11/07/2018 Bus Cards Cherie W. + John R.$165.87 718114 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DISH NETWORK $55.84 Invoice Date Description Amount 0187-10252018 10/25/2018 DishNetwork (11/5/18 - 12/4/18)$55.84 718115 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable DOGGIE WALK BAGS INC $5,150.25 Invoice Date Description Amount 0075832-IN 10/31/2018 Grounds: Doggie Walk Bags $5,150.25 718116 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Employment Development Department $2,970.00 Invoice Date Description Amount L1969908128 10/30/2018 Employment TAX 07/01/18 - 09/30/18 $2,970.00 718117 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable FOLGER GRAPHICS INC $3,370.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 121047 10/31/2018 October 2018 Cupertino Scene $3,370.00 718118 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable FORD, PEGGY $260.89 Invoice Date Description Amount 111418 11/14/2018 Reimbursement for Birthday Bash Program Supplies - Smart & Final $260.89 718119 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable FRANK VILLA $173.62 Invoice Date Description Amount FrankV070418 07/04/2018 Cell Phone Service Reimbursement; 07.05.18- 08.04.18 $32.51 FrankV080418 08/04/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 08.05.18-09.04.18 $31.16 FrankV090418 09/04/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 09.05.18-10.04.18 $36.55 FrankV100418 10/04/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 10.05.18-11.04.18 $36.70 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 3 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 64 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference FrankV110418 11/04/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 11.05.18-12.04.18 $36.70 718120 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable FRIENDS OF STEVENS CREEK TRAIL $9,900.00 Invoice Date Description Amount DCFP-2018-Cupert 11/09/2018 Support Deep Cliff Fish Project 2018 $9,900.00 718121 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable GARDENLAND $490.48 Invoice Date Description Amount 624448 11/09/2018 Trees & Row: Link Roll, Link Cutter $490.48 718122 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRAINGER INC $530.32 Invoice Date Description Amount 9945120450 10/24/2018 Street Pave Maint: Screwdriver Set $73.42 9943197344 10/23/2018 FLEET: Fire Extinguishers $258.79 9950086638 10/30/2018 Streets: Shipping Cartons $198.11 718123 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HE, JUAN $655.20 Invoice Date Description Amount JHE.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $655.20 718124 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HILTI $519.13 Invoice Date Description Amount 4612567355 10/30/2018 Street Sign Markings: Batteries, Belt Hook, Angle Grinder, etc $519.13 718125 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HMH ENGINEERS INC $570.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 34798 09/11/2018 5283.08 McClellan Sep Bikeways PS&E P1 Svs Thru 9/1/2018 $570.00 718126 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HOLLY KIMURA-CARLIN $68.42 Invoice Date Description Amount HollyK11072018 11/07/2018 Reimbursement for CBSM Workshop $68.42 718127 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES $1,027.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7016409 09/28/2018 CLIFF MABUTAS $117.80 3010029 10/02/2018 CLIFF MABUTAS $21.88 300951 10/05/2018 CARIAGA ABRAHAM $29.43 4011348 10/11/2018 CLIFF MABUTAS $34.08 3011482 10/12/2018 FRAUTH JASON $48.44 11991 10/15/2018 ALVAREZ RICARDO $10.12 292658 10/15/2018 ALVAREZ RICARDO $32.58 8050877 10/17/2018 WOLFE KANE $41.44 7027214 10/18/2018 BRIDGE BILL $85.66 3013113 10/22/2018 ALVAREZ RICARDO $349.47 1020284 10/24/2018 CLIFF MABUTAS $116.87 1020364 10/24/2018 ALVAREZ RICARDO $35.55 1310946 10/24/2018 BRIDGE BILL $59.09 9013700 10/26/2018 FRAUTH JASON $44.59 718128 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HU, POLLY $305.00 Invoice Date Description Amount PH.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $305.00 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 4 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 65 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718129 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable HUB INTERNATIONAL $148.68 Invoice Date Description Amount Cert 85628 10/27 10/27/2018 Oct. 2018 Block Party Insurance $148.68 718130 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable IFPTE LOCAL 21 $1,862.05 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 4200 - Association Dues - CEA $1,862.05 718131 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY $877.19 Invoice Date Description Amount 3537854-00 11/01/2018 Grounds: Quinlan Project Supplies $877.19 718132 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable INTERNATIONAL DISPOSAL CORP $116,017.96 Invoice Date Description Amount M180800 09/30/2018 Landfill expense for August 2018 $61,957.31 M180900 10/31/2018 Landfill expense for September 2018 $54,060.65 718133 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable JANICE WRIGHT $716.00 Invoice Date Description Amount JW.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $716.00 718134 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable JIA THOMPSON $1,638.00 Invoice Date Description Amount MM.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $1,638.00 718135 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable JILL HAFF $949.63 Invoice Date Description Amount JH.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $949.63 718136 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable JOHN RAMOS $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount JohnR101318 10/13/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 09.14.18-10.13.18 $55.00 718137 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Keith Day Company, Inc.$300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 16497 10/29/2018 compost delivered to Wilson Park $300.00 718138 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC $415.30 Invoice Date Description Amount 808-00000705730 10/11/2018 FLEET: CLRSHLD EXTLOW NT AUTO PAINT $38.49 808-00000700689 08/30/2018 Facilities: Paint for Senior Center $127.40 808-00000699948 08/23/2018 Facilities-Senior Center: Paint,Trays, Buckets, etc for Sr Ctr $249.41 718139 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable KENYATTA ALI $468.00 Invoice Date Description Amount KA.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $468.00 718140 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable KIMBALL-MIDWEST $2,119.13 Invoice Date Description Amount 6716540 11/01/2018 Fleet: Roto-Kut Drill, Order No. 113359CH $1,742.91 6710551 10/30/2018 Fleet: Drill and Cutter - Order No 013359CH $376.22 718141 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable LETTIRE, COLLEEN $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount ColleenL111318 11/13/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement 10/7/18 -11/06/18 $55.00 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 5 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 66 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718142 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable LOU THURMAN $52.00 Invoice Date Description Amount LT.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $52.00 718143 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable MALLIKA M THOPPAY $160.00 Invoice Date Description Amount MT.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $160.00 718144 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable MARC LABRIE $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount MarcL101918 10/19/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 10.20.18-11.19.18 $55.00 718145 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable MAU TRUONG $334.95 Invoice Date Description Amount MTR.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $334.95 718146 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Mersich, Misty $25.90 Invoice Date Description Amount MistyM11012018 11/01/2018 Reimbursement for ABAG power meeting 10/25/18 $25.90 718147 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS, INC. $152.52 Invoice Date Description Amount INV53671 11/05/2018 Grounds-Civic Center: Flow Regulator $152.52 718148 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CENTER $268.97 Invoice Date Description Amount 96495 10/17/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Topsoil $169.82 96586 10/23/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Gold Fines $99.15 718149 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS $2,530.05 Invoice Date Description Amount TRFINV007088 10/31/2018 Street Sign Markings: Delineator, Post Punch/Stop Radius, etc. $2,530.05 718150 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $145.46 Invoice Date Description Amount 2591-366497 11/08/2018 Oil Filter $49.28 2591-366695 11/09/2018 Oil Filter $117.89 2591-366530 11/08/2018 CREDIT: Oil Filter (Return)($21.71) 718151 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Operating Engineer #3 $1,512.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 4100 - Union Dues*$1,512.16 718152 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC COAST FLAG $145.63 Invoice Date Description Amount 21387 11/05/2018 Facilities-Service Center: 3'X5' United States Nylon $145.63 718153 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PartsTree.com $38.85 Invoice Date Description Amount 7222600 11/02/2018 Misc Equipment Parts: Order #2926753 $38.85 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 6 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 67 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718154 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC $23,443.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 1810-079 11/06/2018 Oct. 2018 Services: Phase 1 PO 2018-628 + Phase 2 PO 2018-631 $23,443.75 718155 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PERS Long Term Care Program $30.28 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 0530 - PERS Long Term Care $30.28 718156 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PG&E $52,454.94 Invoice Date Description Amount Import - 54710 10/31/2018 116367001 -E27H4 Wolfe and Rte 280 NB Loc A $44.86 Import - 54711 10/31/2018 116367013 -1486 S Stelling Rd, Irrigation Control $10.51 Import - 54712 10/31/2018 116367025 -De Anza and Lazaneo, Traffic Signal $66.44 Import - 54713 10/31/2018 116367026 -Behind 10343 N Wolfe, Fountain Pump Pub Works $49.61 Import - 54714 10/31/2018 116367035 -De Anza Blvd and Mariani, Traffic Signal/Safety Lts $68.47 Import - 54716 10/31/2018 116367044 - 10555 Mary Ave NEM $36.89 Import - 54717 10/31/2018 116367045 -De Anza Blvd and Hwy 280 S/Ramp, Traffic Signal $65.74 Import - 54718 10/31/2018 116367050 -NW Corner Stevens Crk, Traffic Signals $69.26 Import - 54719 10/31/2018 116367055 -Saich Wy and Stevens Crk NE Corner, Traffic Signal $56.09 Import - 54720 10/31/2018 116367060 -E37R0 Stevens Creek and De Anza Blvd, Traffic Signal $86.57 Import - 54721 10/31/2018 116367065 -Stevens Creek Blvd E/Saich Wy, Sprinkler Control $11.01 Import - 54722 10/31/2018 116367067 -Stonydale Dr and Varian Park, walkway lighting and Ir $89.37 Import - 54723 10/31/2018 116367070 -Stevens Creek and Blaney Ave., Traffic Signal $75.48 Import - 54724 10/31/2018 116367071 -Linda Vista Dr / Hillside Park, Hillside Park $21.71 Import - 54725 10/31/2018 116367075 -Vallco Pkwy and Perimeter Rd., Traffic Signals $54.86 Import - 54727 10/31/2018 116367090 -Wolfe and Vallco Pkwy, Traffic Signals $78.98 Import - 54728 10/31/2018 116367100 -E37H3 Wolfe and 280 SB Loc B, Traffic Signal $69.45 Import - 54729 10/31/2018 116367105 -Stevens Crk and Wolfe Rd, Traffic Signals $68.91 Import - 54730 10/31/2018 116367110 -SW Cor Stevens Crk and Portal, Traffic Signal $64.57 Import - 54731 10/31/2018 116367113 -Miller E/S 100N off Calle De Barcelona $57.95 Import - 54732 10/31/2018 116367115 -Stevens Crk and Perimeter Rd, Traffic Control Signal $64.00 Import - 54733 10/31/2018 116367120 -Vallco Prky/Tantau Ave, Traffic Signal $77.61 Import - 54734 10/31/2018 116367125 -Stevens Crk and Tantau, Traffic Signals $69.49 Import - 54735 10/31/2018 116367130 -NW Corner Steven Crk and Torre, Traffic Signal $68.20 Import - 54736 10/31/2018 116367145 -10300 Torre Ave, City Hall $11,314.48 Import - 54737 10/31/2018 116367150 -Homestead and Wolfe Road, Sunnyvale $79.33 Import - 54738 10/31/2018 116367154 -22601 Voss Ave $1,397.94 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 7 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 68 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Import - 54739 10/31/2018 116367155 -Homestead and Blaney, Cupertino Traffic Signal, Sunny $45.05 Import - 54740 10/31/2018 116367165 -S/E Wolfe-Pruneridge, Sprinkler Control and Traffic S $82.45 Import - 54741 10/31/2018 116367170 -Tantau Ave and Tandem D/W, Traffic Signal $67.14 Import - 54742 10/31/2018 116367171 -10155 Barbara Ln, Irrigation and Scoreboard $84.89 Import - 54743 10/31/2018 116367175 -S/E Corner Pruneridge and Tantau, Traffic Controller $60.68 Import - 54744 10/31/2018 116367180 -Finch and Stevens Creek, Traffic Signals $71.30 Import - 54747 10/31/2018 116367185 -Wolfe Rd 500 Ft S/O Homestead, City/Sign Lighting $29.12 Import - 54748 10/31/2018 116367195 -Corner Miller and Phil Ln, Traffic Signal $53.87 Import - 54749 10/31/2018 116367200 -Homestead and De Anza Blvd, Traffic Signal/Dept Pub W $69.68 Import - 54750 10/31/2018 116367205 -Homestead Rd and Franco Ct, Traffic Signals $44.66 Import - 54751 10/31/2018 116367215 -N/Ramp De Anza Blvd, Traffic Signal $56.79 Import - 54752 10/31/2018 116367220 -Homestead Rd and Bluejay Rd, Traffic Signals $52.47 Import - 54753 10/31/2018 116367225 -WS Portal Btw Amhurst-Wheaton , Portal Prk Ltg, Prk L $127.98 Import - 54754 10/31/2018 116367236 -Stelling Rd Median 450' S/O Stevens Crk, Landscape Ir $11.93 Import - 54755 10/31/2018 116367245 -Stevens Creek Blvd and Janice Ave, Sprinkler Control $16.19 Import - 54756 10/31/2018 116367255 -Lucille and Villa De Anza, Sprinkler Control $253.15 Import - 54757 10/31/2018 116367269 -Cor/Lucille and Randy Ln, Sprinkler System $11.80 Import - 54758 10/31/2018 116367274 -1170 Yorkshire Dr.$10.74 Import - 54759 10/31/2018 116367275 -Homestead and Tantau, Cupertino Traffic Signal, Sunny $75.76 Import - 54760 10/31/2018 116367280 -Stevens Creek Blvd and Fwy 85 East Ramp, Traffic Sign $72.29 Import - 54761 10/31/2018 116367285 -21111 Stevens Creek Blvd, Sports Center $8,376.53 Import - 54762 10/31/2018 116367285 -21111 Stevens Creek Blvd, Teen Center $375.00 Import - 54763 10/31/2018 116367290 -Stevens Creek and Mary Ave, Traffic Signals $70.92 Import - 54767 10/31/2018 116367325 -21975 San Fernando Ave, Picnic Area $3,264.46 Import - 54768 10/31/2018 116367332 -821 Bubb Rd #B/Building Concession $111.05 Import - 54770 10/31/2018 116367343 -Foothill Blvd 150' N/O Alpine E/S, Irrigation Control $10.57 Import - 54771 10/31/2018 116367357 -N De Anza 188 FT N/Valley Green Dr, Irrig Controller $14.26 Import - 54772 10/31/2018 116367359 -Homestead and Heron, traffic control svc $52.66 Import - 54773 10/31/2018 116367360 -10300 Aninworth Dr, Ball Park Stevens Creek SV $10.43 Import - 54774 10/31/2018 116367370 -Stevens Creek Blvd and Fwy 85 West Ramp, Traffic Sign $9.86 Import - 54775 10/31/2018 116367375 -10710 Stokes Ave, Somerset Park $31.10 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 8 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 69 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Import - 54776 10/31/2018 116367380 -NE Corner Peninsula and Stevens Creek, Traffic Signal $66.11 Import - 54777 10/31/2018 116367385 -End/Stokes W/Wilson Crt, Sprinkler Control $12.05 Import - 54778 10/31/2018 116367395 -N/E corner Foothill and Starling Dr, Traffic Signals $53.06 Import - 54779 10/31/2018 116367401 -Miller W/S N of Greenwood $12.98 Import - 54780 10/31/2018 116367408 -Stevens Creek Bl and Mary Avenue, Memorial Park Pump $60.48 Import - 54783 10/31/2018 116367437 -10455 Miller Ave, Creekside Park $339.23 Import - 54785 10/31/2018 116367447 -Stelling Rd Median 500' S/O Peppertree Ln, Landscape $12.28 Import - 54786 10/31/2018 116367449 -10350 Torre Ave, Community Hall $3,590.23 Import - 54787 10/31/2018 116367455 -E37R9 Rodriguez and De Anza Blvd, Traffic Signal $72.29 Import - 54788 10/31/2018 116367465 -De Anza Blvd and Scofield Dr, Sprinkler Controller $11.79 Import - 54790 10/31/2018 116367474 -10500 Ann Arbor Ave, Field-Garden Gate $15.58 Import - 54791 10/31/2018 116367475 -Foothill and Stevens Creek, Traffic Signal $62.73 Import - 54792 10/31/2018 116367476 -Salem Ave and Foothill Blvd, Irrigation Control $10.53 Import - 54793 10/31/2018 116367477 -21121 Stevens Creek Blvd, Memorial Park $2,257.15 Import - 54794 10/31/2018 116367484 -20220 Suisun Dr, Parks and Rec Free Standing Panel $95.73 Import - 54795 10/31/2018 116367493 -Dumas Dr/Jollyman Park, Jollyman Park Restroom $373.44 Import - 54796 10/31/2018 116367505 -Stevens Crk and Stelling, Signal $40.03 Import - 54797 10/31/2018 116367510 -Bubb Rd and Results Wy, Traffic Signal $49.04 Import - 54798 10/31/2018 116367515 -Bubb Rd and McClellan Intersection, Traffic Signal $71.30 Import - 54799 10/31/2018 116367520 -Stelling Rd and Peppertree, Traffic Signal $47.41 Import - 54800 10/31/2018 116367525 -Stelling and McClellan, Signals $60.49 Import - 54801 10/31/2018 116367527 -Foothill Blvd 200' N/O Stevens Creek W/S, Irrigation $10.53 Import - 54802 10/31/2018 116367530 -Orange Ave and Stevens Creek N/E corner, Traffic Cont $45.51 Import - 54803 10/31/2018 116367536 -Senior Center $5,035.64 Import - 54804 10/31/2018 116367545 -Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd, Traffic Signal $64.87 Import - 54805 10/31/2018 116367550 -W/S Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd @ RT85, Traffic Signal $56.85 Import - 54806 10/31/2018 116367559 -21011 Prospect Rd, Irrigation Control $10.61 Import - 54807 10/31/2018 116367560 -S/E corner De Anza and Pacifica, Traffic Signal $71.69 Import - 54808 10/31/2018 116367568 -CORP YARD NEM $21.53 Import - 54809 10/31/2018 116367570 -De Anza Blvd, Sprinkler Controller *$11.79 Import - 54810 10/31/2018 116367585 -Rainbow and Stelling, Traffic Signal $63.68 Import - 54811 10/31/2018 116367587 -10430 S De Anza Blvd, Holiday Lighting $10.51 Import - 54812 10/31/2018 116367590 -Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd and Hwy 85, Traffic Signal $57.40 Import - 54813 10/31/2018 116367605 -E37C1 Prospect and Rte 85, Traffic Signal $67.50 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 9 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 70 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Import - 54814 10/31/2018 116367610 -E37R6 Kentwood/S. De Anza Blvd, Traffic Signal $66.34 Import - 54815 10/31/2018 116367615 -Fallenleaf Ln and S De Anza Blvd, Traffic Signal $69.26 Import - 54816 10/31/2018 116367620 -S De Anza Blvd and Sharon Dr , Irrigation Controller $16.76 Import - 54817 10/31/2018 116367625 -Stevens Creek Blvd Orange S/W Cor, Irrigation Control $10.51 Import - 54818 10/31/2018 116367628 -N/W corner Alpine Dr and Foothill Blvd, Irrigation Co $10.51 Import - 54819 10/31/2018 116367630 -22100 Stevens Creek Blvd, Golf Pro Shop $332.21 Import - 54820 10/31/2018 116367648 -Linda Vista Park/Linda Vista Dr, Irrigation Control $142.84 Import - 54821 10/31/2018 116367656 -Scofield and De Anza, 100HP $11.98 Import - 54822 10/31/2018 116367677 -De Anza and Lazaneo, Sprinkler System $10.68 Import - 54823 10/31/2018 116367685 -Ruppell Pl and Moltzen Dr, Sprinkler Control $83.69 Import - 54824 10/31/2018 116367740 -Carmen Rd and Stevens Creek S/E corner, Irrigation Co $10.51 Import - 54826 10/31/2018 116367763 -10630 S De Anza Blvd, Holiday Lighting $10.51 Import - 54827 10/31/2018 116367782 -N/S Stevens Creek Blvd in front of 20301, Irrigation $10.53 Import - 54828 10/31/2018 116367793 -101 Skyport Dr, DG A, San Jose, PGandE-Owned St/Highw $832.17 Import - 54829 10/31/2018 116367815 -19784 Wintergreen Dr $485.97 Import - 54831 10/31/2018 116367836 -De Anza Blvd E/S S/O Lazaneo, Sprinkler Control $10.62 Import - 54832 10/31/2018 116367840 -community ctr -NEW $9,267.12 Import - 54833 10/31/2018 116367902 -10246 Parkside Ln, Wilson Pk Sprinklers,Snack Shack,I $264.32 Import - 54834 10/31/2018 116367907 -S/W Corner Stelling and Green leaf, Traffic Signal $65.46 Import - 54835 10/31/2018 116367910 -Foothill Blvd 100' N/O Starling E/S, Irrigation Contr $10.51 Import - 54836 10/31/2018 116367925 -22601 Voss Ave, Outdoor Lighting-MV Park $26.37 Import - 54837 10/31/2018 116367941 -7548 Donegal Dr, Irrigation Control /Hoover Park $10.94 Import - 54839 10/31/2018 116367988 -21710 McClellan Rd, Playground Reception Area $10.53 718157 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Plotter Pros, Inc.$928.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 53036 11/07/2018 T2500 service call: paper jam $928.75 718158 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PSOMAS $740.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 145758 10/23/2018 Cupertino Property Info Web Improvements $740.00 718159 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable REBECCA MCCORMICK $545.30 Invoice Date Description Amount RM.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $545.30 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 10 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 71 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718160 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable REPASKY, CELESTE, E $556.00 Invoice Date Description Amount CR.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $556.00 718161 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable REUSER INC.$2,263.60 Invoice Date Description Amount 8816 10/23/2018 Weekend Work Program: Wood Chips $2,263.60 718162 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable RONALD D OLDS $1,239.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 5235 11/11/2018 AV Office Rack Project; Audio Cable Harness $1,239.50 718163 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ROYAL COACH TOURS $6,124.40 Invoice Date Description Amount 15088 11/14/2018 15088 Yule at the Oakland Zoo $1,026.96 15089 11/14/2018 15089 'Tis the Season $997.24 14713 11/14/2018 14713 Nevada City Holiday $4,100.20 718164 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable RUBY CHEN $200.00 Invoice Date Description Amount RC.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $200.00 718165 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY $50.38 Invoice Date Description Amount 2869-101918 10/19/2018 7038819286-9 - 22050 Stevens Creek Bl $50.38 718166 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT $1,076,704.94 Invoice Date Description Amount 1800065119 11/01/2018 Law Enforcement Services for November 2018 $1,076,704.94 718167 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SANTA CLARA CTY SHERIFF (FINGERPR.) $110.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1800065066 10/30/2018 Live Scan Services Sept. 2018 $110.00 718168 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANS AUTHORITY $75,052.99 Invoice Date Description Amount 1800025328 10/31/2018 Bill 15 Apple Campus 2 Traffic Mit Improv/Rapid 523 Bus Improv $75,052.99 718169 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SMITH'S FAMILY OF COMPANIES, INC $185.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 47429 09/15/2018 Grounds: 3 Oaks Park - Gopher Mgmt $185.00 718170 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SOPHORA MANDARIN LEARNING $288.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 110618 11/06/2018 Intermediate Mandarin Instruction (9.14-11.2) 9 Students $288.00 718171 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE $165.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 3394908455 10/31/2018 General supplies $125.21 3394616869 10/30/2018 General Supplies $52.52 3386901428CR 08/14/2018 Credit for Diet coke not received ($11.98) Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 11 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 72 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718172 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable State Disbursement Unit $276.92 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 0100 - Child Support $276.92 718173 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUZANNE MARIE BESLER $86.13 Invoice Date Description Amount SB.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $86.13 718174 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF SF $1,638.46 Invoice Date Description Amount 250439235 11/02/2018 Sr. Center coffee/food/social supplies $1,638.46 718175 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable TGIB MARKETING, INC $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 10264967 11/01/2018 Hot Z-3 pull carts for resale $144.00 718176 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable The Consulting Team LLC $9,516.36 Invoice Date Description Amount 879 11/06/2018 Consulting Team- CM $9,516.36 718177 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Tripepi, Smith and Associates, Inc $807.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 3679 10/31/2018 Newsletter Support for November 2018 $807.50 718178 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable TSAI , JENNY $320.00 Invoice Date Description Amount JT.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $320.00 718179 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CO $534.08 Invoice Date Description Amount IV28006 11/06/2018 Hedge Trimmer & Power $534.08 718180 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable VALLEY OIL COMPANY $913.64 Invoice Date Description Amount 43169 11/07/2018 PC Supreme SW20 Bulk Oil $913.64 718181 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable VIOLATION PROCESSING DEPARTMENT $30.00 Invoice Date Description Amount T711878278435 11/02/2018 Trees & Row-Medians: Toll Violation $30.00 718182 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable WILEY PRICE & RADULOVICH LLP $8,848.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 29118 10/31/2018 Professional Services October 2018 $8,848.50 718183 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable WILLIAM RASSIEUR $400.00 Invoice Date Description Amount WR.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $400.00 718184 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable AIRBNBMARGIE $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7726 11/13/2018 AIRBNBMARGIE Inv#7726 Refund $144.00 718185 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Bortner, Eleanor $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499781 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 12 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 73 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718186 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Burkart, Bruce $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499782 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718187 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Chin, Elizabeth $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 172 11/08/2018 QCC Rental Refunds $500.00 718188 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Chuang, Yung-Ho $21,600.00 Invoice Date Description Amount BS29166 11/05/2018 10734 S. Stelling Rd. - 100% LM Bond - BS29166 $21,600.00 718189 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Cupertino Chamber of Commerce $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 267 11/08/2018 Refund for Community Hall security deposit, 10.22.18, P#R267 $500.00 718190 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CUSTOMPAX INC $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7330 11/14/2018 CUSTOMPAX INC Inv#7330 Refund $144.00 718191 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Donnelly, Lorraine $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499783 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718192 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Ebisui, Paul $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499784 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718193 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Finn, Rita $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499785 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718194 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Friends of Better Cupertino $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2502 11/08/2018 Refund for Cupertino Room security deposit, 11.7.18, P#R2502 $500.00 718195 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hieta, Ruth Ann $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499786 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718196 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hsu, Cindy $15,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 212499 11/05/2018 10240 Lebanon Dr - 100% Labor & Material Bond - #212499 $15,000.00 718197 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable INTRAHEALTH PHYSICAL THERAPY $185.04 Invoice Date Description Amount 7522 11/14/2018 INTRAHEALTH PHYSICAL THERAPY Inv#7522 Refund $185.04 718198 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable JIEYUAN GARDEN $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7710 11/14/2018 JIEYUAN GARDEN Inv#7710 Refund $144.00 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 13 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 74 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718199 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Kuila, Kaushik $2,250.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 205975 11/05/2018 21891 Lomita Ave - 10% FP Bond & Dev Maint Dpst - #205975 $2,250.00 718200 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Lange, Susan $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499787 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718201 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Lederer, Lee $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499788 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718202 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Li, Ying $11,600.00 Invoice Date Description Amount BS28256 11/05/2018 20791 Dunbar Dr. - Encroachment Bond - BS28256 $11,600.00 718203 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable LOVELY GIRAFFE LLC $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7564 11/14/2018 LOVELY GIRAFFE LLC Inv#7564 Refund $144.00 718204 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Schaeffer, Sally $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499789 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718205 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SF ACPU $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 239 11/08/2018 Refund for Cupertino Room security deposit, 11.08.18, P#R239 $500.00 718206 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SIGNATURE REALTY $144.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7418 11/14/2018 SIGNATURE REALTY Inv#7418 Refund $144.00 718207 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SK Education Consulting Group $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 226 11/08/2018 Refund for Social Room security deposit, 10.21.18, P#R226 $300.00 718208 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Uffer, Glenda $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499790 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718209 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Wessler, Ed $3.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 499791 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $3.75 718210 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Wulff, Nancy $98.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499778 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $98.00 718211 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Wulff, Nancy $98.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499780 11/09/2018 Senior Center Refunds 11/01-11/09/18 $98.00 718212 11/15/2018 Open Accounts Payable HU, POLLY $1,184.90 Invoice Date Description Amount 101718 10/17/2018 Chair Exercise (9.10-10.15) 34 Students $1,184.90 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 14 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 75 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718213 11/15/2018 Open Accounts Payable JI, ZHAOHUI $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1448053 12/14/2017 QCC Rental Refunds $300.00 Type Check Totals:130 Transactions $1,831,842.65 EFT 28105 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Employment Development $1,320.03 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 SDI - State Disability Insurance*$1,320.03 28106 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PERS-457K $8,895.55 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 3200 - *PERS Deferred Comp*$8,895.55 28107 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ANGELA TSUI $751.06 Invoice Date Description Amount LazyDog_09-26-18 09/26/2018 Business lunch to discuss Small Business Saturday Celebration $61.60 OCK_10-25-18 10/25/2018 Business development meeting with broker $86.60 Panera Order8542 10/24/2018 Meeting with consultants to discuss EDSP items $137.61 DoppioZero102618 10/26/2018 Refreshments for CBPWG Monthly Lunch Meeting $265.25 11-06-18_CREW 11/06/2018 CREW November meeting $180.00 Rotary_10-17-18 10/17/2018 Rotary weekly meeting $20.00 28108 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable BRIAN GATHERS $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount BrianG110418 11/04/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 10.05.18-11.04.18 $55.00 28109 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CHERI DONNELLY $24.75 Invoice Date Description Amount CheriD 110518 11/05/2018 Reimbursement CASQA 2018 conference meal and incidentals $24.75 28110 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable CLIFF MABUTAS $83.41 Invoice Date Description Amount CliffM091218 09/12/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 08.13.18-09.12.18 $41.67 CliffM101218 10/12/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 09.13.18-10.12.18 $41.74 28111 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Eflex Group, Inc $4,381.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 4600 - *Dependent Care FSA*$4,381.75 28112 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRACE DUVAL $615.00 Invoice Date Description Amount GD.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $615.00 28113 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRACE SCHMIDT $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount GraceS11/9/18 11/09/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement10/05/18 - 11/04/18 $55.00 28114 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable Guzman , Jacqueline $165.00 Invoice Date Description Amount JaquiG11142018 11/14/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement 9/8/18 - 12/7 $165.00 28115 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable ICMA Retirement Trust-457 $1,827.54 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 3100 - *ICMA Deferred Comp*$1,827.54 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 15 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 76 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 28116 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable JASON FAUTH $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount JasonF101918b 10/19/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimbursement; 10.20.18-11.19.18 $55.00 28117 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable KONGBOON, SA-AD $506.57 Invoice Date Description Amount SK.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $506.57 28118 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable MONA AHUJA $292.50 Invoice Date Description Amount MA.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $292.50 28119 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable National Deferred (ROTH)$3,345.77 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 3010 - Nationwide Roth $3,345.77 28120 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable National Deferred Compensatin $27,897.84 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 3000 - *Nationwide Deferred Compensatio*$27,897.84 28121 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable NESSIA STARR $308.85 Invoice Date Description Amount NS.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $308.85 28122 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable O'GRADY PAVING INC $104,333.18 Invoice Date Description Amount 2924 10/31/2018 18143-2018 Minor AC Repairs Payment 1 $104,333.18 28123 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable PARS/City of Cupertino $4,459.72 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 3321 - PARS Employee *$4,459.72 28124 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SARA FRAZIER $377.00 Invoice Date Description Amount SF.2F 11/13/2018 2nd fall payment $377.00 28125 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable SHRIVASTAVA, AARTI $266.15 Invoice Date Description Amount REIM110918 11/09/2018 2018/19 Planning Staff Retreat lunch at Drake's Dealership $266.15 28126 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS LEUNG $740.41 Invoice Date Description Amount CalpersEdu2018 10/21/2018 Travel for CalPERS Educational Forum $740.41 28127 11/16/2018 Open Accounts Payable TIMM BORDEN $733.73 Invoice Date Description Amount TimmB100218 10/02/2018 Hotel during NACTO meeting 10/1-10/2/2018 $229.25 TimmB091418 09/14/2018 Hyatt during League of CA Cities Conf. 9/12-9/14/18 $504.48 Type EFT Totals:23 Transactions $161,490.81 Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 130 $1,831,842.65 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 16 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 77 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Total 130 $1,831,842.65 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 23 $161,490.81 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 23 $161,490.81 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 153 $1,993,333.46 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 153 $1,993,333.46 $0.00 Grand Totals: Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 130 $1,831,842.65 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 130 $1,831,842.65 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 23 $161,490.81 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 23 $161,490.81 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 153 $1,993,333.46 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 153 $1,993,333.46 $0.00 Monday, November 19, 2018Pages: 17 of 17user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/10/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/16/2018 78 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4858 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/10/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 23, 2018 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 23, 2018 Adopt Resolution No. 19-016 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 23, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™79 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING November 23, 2018 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Zach Korach, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor, City of Cupertino 80 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Main Account - Main Checking Account Check 718214 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable 3M $531.22 Invoice Date Description Amount 9402636531 11/05/2018 Street Sign Markings: 3M Marker Ylw Two-Way $531.22 718215 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable 4LEAF INC $36,628.71 Invoice Date Description Amount J1848A36 11/14/2018 AC2 #501 Building Inspections 2018/10 $36,628.71 718216 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable ABAG POWER PURCHASING POOL (GAS) $4,644.57 Invoice Date Description Amount AR018703 11/01/2018 CUPACPC001 $4,644.57 718217 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable ADVANTAGE GRAFIX $947.96 Invoice Date Description Amount 42558 11/08/2018 Veterans Day Memorial Programs 2018 $947.96 718218 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable AIRGAS USA LLC $185.44 Invoice Date Description Amount 9957439713 10/31/2018 Streets-Env Materials: Cylinder Rental $60.41 9957439714 10/31/2018 Streets-Env Materials: Cylinder Rental $125.03 718219 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALDANA, JOSE, B.$600.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2957 11/17/2018 Audio connector soldering for Office AV Rack $600.00 718220 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable AMERICAN BEVERAGE EQUIPMENT INC $175.90 Invoice Date Description Amount 44602 11/05/2018 Facilities: Senior Ctr Refrigerator Repair $175.90 718221 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable AVANTI STORAGE SYSTEMS, INC $2,191.42 Invoice Date Description Amount 3822 11/16/2018 Lockers for City Hall women's locker room $2,191.42 718222 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable AZTECA SYSTEMS INC $52,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 15295 11/01/2018 Cityworks Logins & Storeroom Licenses 12/31/18- 12/30/19 $52,000.00 718223 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable BELLAFRESCA FOODS $783.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 368466 10/19/2018 Bella Fresca Foods - Pumpkins $783.50 718224 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable BOETHING TREELAND FARMS INC $170.47 Invoice Date Description Amount SI-1174359 10/18/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Plants, Order #SO- 1170634 $170.47 718225 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable BRIGHTVIEW TREE COMPANY $670.35 Invoice Date Description Amount 5998488 10/12/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Trees $670.35 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 1 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 81 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718226 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable CAPITOL WHOLESALE NURSERY INC $2,538.42 Invoice Date Description Amount 46669 11/16/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Plants $2,538.42 718227 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable CENTURYLINK $22.18 Invoice Date Description Amount 468R-110718 11/07/2018 Emergency Phone Services 11.07-12.06 $22.18 718228 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST $118.43 Invoice Date Description Amount 6411-110318 11/03/2018 8155100050376411 11/6/18 - 12/05/18 $118.43 718229 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable CSG CONSULTANTS INC $6,480.91 Invoice Date Description Amount B181161 11/01/2018 Building Plan Review Services 10/1-10/31 $6,480.91 718230 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC $1,453.75 Invoice Date Description Amount 184427 10/25/2018 Trees & ROW: Cop MIP Adapt, Cop St 90, Map/Pro Gas $115.40 184632 10/29/2018 Facilities-Creekside: CP Grid Strainers $27.59 182194 10/30/2018 Facilities-Sport Center: Solis Faucet $1,310.76 718231 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND COLLECTIONS $263.58 Invoice Date Description Amount 5538161 09/18/2018 984-02-007 10800 Torre Ave. Property Tax 7/1/18- 6/30/19 $263.58 718232 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable DIGITAL PRINT $182.22 Invoice Date Description Amount 19854 11/07/2018 Business Cards for Savita Vaidhyanathan and Barry Chang $182.22 718233 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC $279.95 Invoice Date Description Amount 432419-01 10/31/2018 Trees & ROW: Prusik, Zig Zag Mechanical $279.95 718234 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Friends of Vision Literacy $180.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 111918 11/19/2018 ESL Advanced Instruction (9.20-11.15) 9 Students $180.00 718235 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable GARDENLAND $85.25 Invoice Date Description Amount 624447 11/09/2018 Trees & ROW: Blue Grip Gloves $85.25 718236 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRAINGER INC $246.19 Invoice Date Description Amount 9953848794 11/02/2018 Streets-Street LIghting: Batteries, Order #1335590403 $32.35 9953848786 11/02/2018 Streets-Street Lighting: Supplies, Order #1335610075 $153.37 9955674602 11/05/2018 Service Center Admin: Batteries, Order #1335788884 $20.37 9958708779 11/07/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Hard Hat, Order #1335984396 $40.10 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 2 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 82 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718237 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable GRANITE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC $3,767.56 Invoice Date Description Amount IN44407-1 11/13/2018 Dell OIpti Plex 7460 $3,767.56 718238 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable HDL COREN & CONE $4,081.25 Invoice Date Description Amount 0026094-IN 11/05/2018 Property Tax October - December 2018 $4,081.25 718239 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY $1,691.76 Invoice Date Description Amount 3541813-00 11/05/2018 Trees & ROW: Fert Best 10Gr Best-Pak Pack $493.44 3466178-01 11/07/2018 Grounds-Memorial Park: Sprinkler supplies $848.35 3545817-00 11/07/2018 Grounds-Sports Fields: sprinkler supplies $349.97 718240 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable INDEPENDENT CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. $19,687.36 Invoice Date Description Amount 1062 11/05/2018 Building On Call Plan Review Services $19,687.36 718241 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable INSERV COMPANY $722.67 Invoice Date Description Amount 60328 11/01/2018 Facilities: Water Treatment Product Agreement $722.67 718242 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable JAM SERVICES INC $154,958.76 Invoice Date Description Amount 112641 11/06/2018 Street Lighting Packages and Steel Plate Covers $17,945.76 111309 10/09/2018 Trees & ROW-Medians: Pedestal w Anchor Bolts $1,580.50 112520 11/05/2018 70 fixed base and 70 overhead feed streetlights $135,432.50 718243 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Jarvis, Fay, Doporto & Gibson, LLP $9,114.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 12121 06/30/2018 Legal Services $9,114.00 718244 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable John Cahalan Landscape Architect $8,480.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1, 2019-003 10/25/2018 SENIOR CENTER ADA SIDEWALK PROJECT Inv #1 9/5-10/14/18 $8,480.00 718245 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable KIMBALL-MIDWEST $1,125.61 Invoice Date Description Amount 6727699 11/07/2018 Equipment Maint: Supplies, Order No. 013399CH $394.21 6727471 11/07/2018 Streets Sign Mark:Tape, Air Duster, Zymex, etc., Order #013389CH $731.40 718246 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable LUIS MACIAS SALAMANCA $1,000.73 Invoice Date Description Amount MaciasCater1 11/19/2018 Breakfast with Santa Food $1,000.73 718247 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Mersich, Misty $117.58 Invoice Date Description Amount MistyM111418 11/14/2018 Reimbursement for food for Employee Carpool Event on 11/14/18 $117.58 718248 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST $4,141.37 Invoice Date Description Amount Neopost110418 11/04/2018 Postage fee and Late fee $4,141.37 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 3 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 83 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718249 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS $469.70 Invoice Date Description Amount TRFINV007208 11/05/2018 Streets Sign Markings: Delineator and Buttons, etc.$469.70 718250 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SVCS $543.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2005269 11/09/2018 payphone svcs 12/01/18 -12/31/2018 $543.00 718251 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable PAUL DAVIS $140.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 111918 11/19/2018 Bridge Instruction (11.3-11.17) 8 Students $140.80 718252 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable PINE PRESS $866.55 Invoice Date Description Amount 00049840 10/15/2018 50+ Scene Newsletter Printing $866.55 718253 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable R & B Company $372.07 Invoice Date Description Amount S1794829.001 11/14/2018 Trees & ROW: Valves, Cust order #2019-00000275 $372.07 718254 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable ReadyRefresh by Nestle $388.02 Invoice Date Description Amount 18K0027344597 11/08/2018 Employee Drinking Water $388.02 718255 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable RONALD D OLDS $1,091.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 5236 11/19/2018 Office AV Rack Wiring $1,091.50 718256 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable RPM EXTERMINATORS INC $1,050.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 0070500 10/31/2018 Facilities: Change Rodent Bait $1,050.00 718257 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SAN FRANCISCO ART COMMISSION DOCENT PROGRAM $100.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 12052018 12/05/2018 Fee for SF City Hall Docent Tour 12/05/2018 $100.00 718258 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT $31,228.31 Invoice Date Description Amount 1800064236 08/20/2018 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services July 18 $17,926.13 1800065129 11/02/2018 Supplemental Law Enforcement for September 2018 $13,302.18 718259 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SCCCMA $40.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 12052018 11/19/2018 Check Req. for CM to attend Holiday Appreciation Lunch on 12/5 $40.00 718260 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SCREEN DESIGNS $1,036.58 Invoice Date Description Amount 37739 08/19/2018 Preschool Shirts 2018-2019 $1,036.58 718261 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SERVICE STATION SYSTEMS, INC.$3,225.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1615615 10/31/2018 Compliance Testing, Completed, Test SB989 $3,225.00 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 4 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 84 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718262 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SMITH'S FAMILY OF COMPANIES, INC $710.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 49948 11/15/2018 Grounds-School Site Maint: Gopher Mgmt Garden Gate $150.00 49954 11/15/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Monthly Gopher Mgmt Hoover Park $200.00 49962 11/15/2018 Grounds-Neighborhood Parks: Monthly Gopher Mgmt: 3 Oaks Park $185.00 49966 11/15/2018 Grounds: Monthly Gopher Mgmt: Linda Vista Park $175.00 718263 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable STATE OF CALIFORNIA $115.00 Invoice Date Description Amount C46380 11/14/2018 Civil Engineer License Renewal M. Zimmermann $115.00 718264 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUNNYVALE FORD $2,166.28 Invoice Date Description Amount FOCS786539 11/12/2018 VEH470-Brake Replacement, Reline Rear Disc, Check Tire Pressure $2,166.28 718265 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUPPLYWORKS $595.74 Invoice Date Description Amount 462309626 10/30/2018 Facilities-Park Bathrooms: Janitorial Supplies, Order #20688982 $50.62 463400697 11/06/2018 Facilities-Park Bathrooms: Janitorial Supplies, Order #20812795 $545.12 718266 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable T & T PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND $2,045.06 Invoice Date Description Amount 2018557 11/09/2018 Street Sign Markings: UB256 buckles $225.63 2018555 11/09/2018 Street Sign Markings: Supplies $65.40 2018556 11/09/2018 Street Sign Markings: Bandit Clamps, Rivets, Mount Bases, etc. $1,754.03 718267 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable THE BIG DREAMERS $750.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1106 10/24/2018 Entertainment for Small Business Saturday Community Celebration $750.00 718268 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable UNITED SITE SERVICES INC.$560.09 Invoice Date Description Amount 114-7562951 10/29/2018 Facilities-Creekside Park: Restrooms Weekly Service $560.09 718269 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable VALLEY OIL COMPANY $7,322.22 Invoice Date Description Amount 949701 11/14/2018 Mid 10% Ethanol Fuel $7,322.22 718270 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable VERDE DESIGN INC $2,090.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 7-1723500 11/07/2018 Payment #7, services from Sept 26 to Oct 25, 2018 $2,090.00 718271 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable VERIZON WIRELESS $8,544.30 Invoice Date Description Amount 9817752250-1 11/04/2018 408-605-2546 Michael Zimmerman $49.89 9817752250-2 11/04/2018 408-688-1613 Ricardo Alvarez $38.01 9817752250-3 11/04/2018 408-482-9730 Steven Scharf $143.97 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 5 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 85 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 9817752250-4 11/04/2018 408-340-3524 Amy Chan $53.78 9817752250-5 11/04/2018 408-234-0843 Misty Mersich $38.01 9817752250-6 11/04/2018 408-510-0198 Gilee Corral $38.01 9817752250-7 11/04/2018 408-318-1635 Brian Babcock $38.01 9817752250-8 11/04/2018 408-466-4450 Colleen Lettire $38.01 9817752250-9 11/04/2018 408-691-9432 Jaqui Guzman $38.01 9817752250-10 11/04/2018 408-828-5489 Grace Schmidt Ipad $38.01 9817752250-11 11/04/2018 408-891-7964 Kirsten Squarcia $38.01 9817752250-12 11/04/2018 408-483-5947 Araceli Alejandre MiFi $38.01 9817752250-13 11/04/2018 408-483-9976 Rocio Fierro MiFi $38.01 9817752250-14 11/04/2018 408-963-9329 Rocio Fierro $38.01 9817752250-15 11/04/2018 650-269-5567 Araceli Alejandre $38.01 9817752250-16 11/04/2018 408-316-7320 Gulu Sakhrani $38.01 9817752250-17 11/04/2018 408-497-4862 Jeff Trybus/IT Wireless $38.01 9817752250-18 11/04/2018 408-655-8680 Jeff Trybus $53.73 9817752250-19 11/04/2018 408-204-3449 Rei Delgado $38.01 9817752250-20 11/04/2018 408-340-3184 Peter Coglianese $38.01 9817752250-21 11/04/2018 408-340-3387 Robert Kim $38.01 9817752250-22 11/04/2018 408-963-3875 Robert Kim $38.01 9817752250-23 11/04/2018 408-340-8060 Nidhi Mathur $38.01 9817752250-24 11/04/2018 408-489-2932 Ross Slaney $38.01 9817752250-25 11/04/2018 408-630-0900 Shivani Tripathi $38.01 9817752250-26 11/04/2018 408-309-7042 Kristina Alfaro $49.89 9817752250-28 11/04/2018 408-515-7650 Karen Bernard-Guerin $49.89 9817752250-29 11/04/2018 408-761-3636 Zach Korach $81.59 9817752250-30 11/04/2018 408-483-0309 Maria Jimenez $91.59 9817752250-31 11/04/2018 408-642-4504 Jeff Milkes $38.01 9817752250-32 11/04/2018 408-314-9200 Rebecca Shaffer $38.01 9817752250-33 11/04/2018 408-479-0894 Mariah Dabel $38.01 9817752250-34 11/04/2018 408-234-4724 Building Attendants Quinlan $49.89 9817752250-35 11/04/2018 408-315-6764 Rachelle Sander Mifi $38.01 9817752250-36 11/04/2018 408-891-9503 Rachelle Sander $50.30 9817752250-37 11/04/2018 408-204-4497 D. Kristina Grandbois $70.86 9817752250-38 11/04/2018 408-205-3349 Senior Ctr/Rafael $50.30 9817752250-39 11/04/2018 408-340-8688 Kim Frey $38.01 9817752250-40 11/04/2018 408-497-1946 It Stock $38.01 9817752250-41 11/04/2018 408-857-4414 Kim Frey $6.84 9817752250-42 11/04/2018 408-202-5384 Adrianna Stankovich $38.01 9817752250-43 11/04/2018 408-234-1543 Karen Goss $51.50 9817752250-44 11/04/2018 408-439-8937 Alex Corbalis $14.01 9817752250-45 11/04/2018 408-693-7088 Adrianna Stankovich $50.28 9817752250-46 11/04/2018 408-857-2355 Alex Corbalis Travel Agent $54.21 9817752250-47 11/04/2018 408-891-9971 Karen Goss $38.01 9817752250-48 11/04/2018 408-891-9008 Park Ranger Corridor $49.89 9817752250-49 11/04/2018 408-309-5709 Clare Francavilla $38.01 9817752250-50 11/04/2018 408-841-6612 C. Internet Emergncyva $38.01 9817752250-51 11/04/2018 $DUWL6KULYDVWDYD$38.01 9817752250-52 11/04/2018 650-203-4048 Aarti Shrivastava $49.89 9817752250-53 11/04/2018 408-482-5991 Benjamin Fu $38.01 9817752250-54 11/04/2018 408-489-8336 Beth Ebben 2 $38.01 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 6 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 86 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 9817752250-55 11/04/2018 408-568-6465 Beth Ebben 1 $38.01 9817752250-56 11/04/2018 408-688-6252 Benjamin Fu $52.04 9817752250-57 11/04/2018 408-309-0340 Piu Ghosh $50.50 9817752250-58 11/04/2018 408-309-4294 Albert Salvador $60.02 9817752250-59 11/04/2018 408-892-5553 Albert Salvador $38.01 9817752250-60 11/04/2018 408-314-6637 Sean Hatch $38.01 9817752250-61 11/04/2018 408-334-9082 Sean Hatch/ City of Cupertino $49.89 9817752250-62 11/04/2018 408-309-7640 Bob Sabich $526.44 9817752250-63 11/04/2018 408-309-9249 Jeff Greef $49.89 9817752250-64 11/04/2018 408-309-9252 Antonio Torrez $50.98 9817752250-65 11/04/2018 408-316-2067 Paul O Sullivan $526.45 9817752250-66 11/04/2018 408-318-7365 Bob Sabich $38.01 9817752250-67 11/04/2018 408-472-6522 Jeff Greef $38.01 9817752250-68 11/04/2018 408-472-7295 Antonio Torrez $38.01 9817752250-69 11/04/2018 408-472-7857 Paul O'Sullivan $38.01 9817752250-70 11/04/2018 408-472-7927 Bill Mitchell $17.18 9817752250-71 11/04/2018 408-309-0536 Phillip Wilkomm $49.89 9817752250-72 11/04/2018 408-340-8119 Phillip Wilkomm $38.01 9817752250-73 11/04/2018 408-781-4139 Julia Kinst $38.01 9817752250-74 11/04/2018 408-340-8648 Chad Mosley $38.01 9817752250-75 11/04/2018 408-489-9310 Kevin Rieden $38.01 9817752250-76 11/04/2018 408-510-9158 Winnie Pagan $38.01 9817752250-77 11/04/2018 408-472-6541 John Raaymakers $38.01 9817752250-78 11/04/2018 408-234-8494 Roger Lee $55.71 9817752250-79 11/04/2018 408-460-1821 Ty Bloomquist $69.59 9817752250-80 11/04/2018 408-628-8745 Ken Tanase $38.01 9817752250-81 11/04/2018 408-693-9515 Carl Valdez $49.89 9817752250-82 11/04/2018 408-693-9822 Carl Valdez $38.01 9817752250-83 11/04/2018 408-781-9922 Chylene Osborne $31.88 9817752250-84 11/04/2018 408-857-3211 Kim Frey $51.19 9817752250-85 11/04/2018 408-313-5321 Paul Sapudar $38.01 9817752250-86 11/04/2018 408-313-6943 Travis Warner $38.01 9817752250-87 11/04/2018 408-315-8165 Brian Gathers $38.01 9817752250-88 11/04/2018 408-482-6096 Marc Labrie $38.01 9817752250-89 11/04/2018 408-497-3338 Marc Labrie $38.01 9817752250-90 11/04/2018 408-497-3691 Ricardo Alvarez $38.01 9817752250-91 11/04/2018 408-497-4686 Cliff Mabutas $38.01 9817752250-92 11/04/2018 408-497-4809 Kevin Greene $38.01 9817752250-93 11/04/2018 408-966-0384 Cliff Mabutas MiFi $38.01 9817752250-94 11/04/2018 408-966-0471 Brian Gathers MiFi $38.01 9817752250-95 11/04/2018 408-309-8468 Jerry Anderson $38.01 9817752250-96 11/04/2018 408-334-4885 Jason Pato (Ipad)$38.01 9817752250-98 11/04/2018 408-781-0663 Brad Alexander Street Division #2 $38.01 9817752250-99 11/04/2018 408-206-4856 Curtis Bloomquist $62.57 9817752250-100 11/04/2018 408-483-7997 Curtis Bloomquist MiFi $38.01 9817752250-101 11/04/2018 408-781-0799 Brad Alexander Street Division #3 $38.01 9817752250-102 11/04/2018 408-314-4452 HazMat/S. Tognetti $50.57 9817752250-103 11/04/2018 408-483-7859 Shawn Tognetti $38.01 9817752250-104 11/04/2018 408-781-1340 Brad Alexander Street Division #4 $38.01 9817752250-105 11/04/2018 408-234-1270 Jonathan Ferrante Medians Group #1 $38.01 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 7 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 87 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 9817752250-106 11/04/2018 408-318-8726 Jason Fauth $38.01 9817752250-107 11/04/2018 408-493-3534 Jonathan Ferrante Median Crew 2 $38.01 9817752250-108 11/04/2018 408-313-3558 Street Tree Maintenance #3 $38.01 9817752250-109 11/04/2018 408-313-4364 Street Tree Maintenance #4 $38.01 9817752250-110 11/04/2018 408-315-3044 Jonathan Ferrante $50.35 9817752250-111 11/04/2018 408-489-9309 Jonathan Ferrante $38.01 9817752250-112 11/04/2018 408-472-8289 Jonathan Ferrante WWP $28.86 9817752250-113 11/04/2018 408-568-3911 Jonathan Ferrante WWP $38.01 9817752250-114 11/04/2018 408-309-8401 Rudy Lomas $38.01 9817752250-115 11/04/2018 408-609-4188 Jason Giorgianni $38.01 9817752250-116 11/04/2018 408-609-4367 Isaac Preciado $38.01 9817752250-117 11/04/2018 408-609-8711 Bill Bodene $38.01 9817752250-118 11/04/2018 408-609-8796 Rob Griffiths $38.01 9817752250-119 11/04/2018 408-609-8826 Domingo Santos $38.01 9817752250-120 11/04/2018 408-472-7011 Ty Bloomquist $38.01 9817752250-121 11/04/2018 408-472-1568 David Stillman $53.73 9817752250-122 11/04/2018 408-497-9307 David Stillman $38.01 9817752250-123 11/04/2018 408-510-9632 Julie Chiu $38.01 9817752250-124 11/04/2018 408-568-0737 Chris Corrao $56.59 9817752250-126 11/04/2018 408-781-3499 Jennifer Chu $38.01 9817752250-127 11/04/2018 408-610-0601 Paul Tognetti $50.03 9817752250-129 11/04/2018 408-781-4360 Paul Tognetti $38.01 9817752250-130 11/04/2018 408-472-9907 Manuel Barragan $55.12 9817752250-131 11/04/2018 408-466-4906 Kerri Heusler Housing Planner $38.01 9817752250-132 11/04/2018 408-318-2012 Kane Wolfe $38.01 9817752250-133 11/04/2018 408-691-2466 Kane Wolfe $53.73 9817752250-134 11/04/2018 408-781-0290 Brad Alexander Street Division #1 $38.01 9817752250-135 11/04/2018 408-204-3430 Lauren Dickinson $38.01 9817752250-136 11/04/2018 408-316-1233 Cheri Donnelly $396.19 9817752250-137 11/04/2018 408-340-8128 Cheri Donnelly $38.01 9817752250-138 11/04/2018 408-599-4937 Ursula Syrova $38.01 9817752250-139 11/04/2018 408-642-4263 Alex Wykoff/IT Wireless $38.01 9817752250-140 11/04/2018 408-655-8685 Alex Wykoff $49.89 9817752250-141 11/04/2018 408-781-6411 Compost Site $28.86 9817752250-142 11/04/2018 408-497-7220 Colleen Ferris iPad $38.01 9817752250-143 11/04/2018 408-309-2693 Christine Hanel $38.01 9817752250-144 11/04/2018 408-309-1985 Barbara Banfield $51.10 9817752250-145 11/04/2018 408-438-7489 Karen Levy $38.01 9817752250-146 11/04/2018 408-234-0189 Bill Mi-Fi $38.01 9817752250-147 11/04/2018 /LVD0DOHWLV0DVVH\$38.01 9817752250-148 11/04/2018 408-316-1283 Bill Mitchell $38.01 9817752250-149 11/04/2018 408-205-4541 Iqraam Nabi $38.01 9817752250-150 11/04/2018 408-205-6589 It Stock $70.86 9817752250-151 11/04/2018 408-206-0538 Quinton Adams $53.73 9817752250-152 11/04/2018 408-209-0148 It Stock $51.18 9817752250-153 11/04/2018 408-209-3255 Quinton Adams iPad $38.01 9817752250-154 11/04/2018 408-309-5733 It Stock $38.01 9817752250-155 11/04/2018 408-313-0045 Toan Quach $38.01 9817752250-156 11/04/2018 408-313-1148 Toan Quach $70.86 9817752250-157 11/04/2018 408-497-5327 IT Stock $49.89 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 8 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 88 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 9817752250-158 11/04/2018 408-497-6765 IT Loaner iPad 12.9 64GB $36.31 9817752250-159 11/04/2018 408-497-6873 IT Loaner iPad 10.5 64GB $38.01 9817752250-160 11/04/2018 408-510-1975 IT Stock $49.89 9817752250-161 11/04/2018 408-510-2759 IT Stock $49.89 9817752250-162 11/04/2018 408-568-9211 IT Test Phone $49.89 9817752250-163 11/04/2018 408-605-3078 Quinton MiFi $38.01 9817752250-165 11/04/2018 408-691-4458 Mayor Intern $38.01 9817752250-166 11/04/2018 408-761-2941 IT Stock $38.01 9817752250-167 11/04/2018 408-891-1004 Benny Hsieh $4.92 9817752250-168 11/04/2018 408-892-1486 Iqraam Nabi $50.03 9817752250-170 11/04/2018 408-963-8123 I&T Loaner 2 128gb Air $36.31 9817752250-172 11/04/2018 408-234-0978 GIS Department $38.01 9817752250-173 11/04/2018 408-440-7136 Andy Badal $38.01 9817752250-174 11/04/2018 408-466-4765 GIS #1 $38.01 9817752250-175 11/04/2018 408-483-3215 Teri Gerhardt $38.01 9817752250-177 11/04/2018 408-206-7512 Tracy Ayala $38.01 9817752250-178 11/04/2018 408-605-3905 Andrew Schmitt MiFi 2 $38.01 718272 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Vintage Contractors, Inc $131,480.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 6451 11/14/2018 LED Sign 2017-19.02 $131,480.00 718273 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable WESTERN SYSTEMS $6,436.11 Invoice Date Description Amount 0000036659 08/10/2018 RMA: C34157-C34164 & C34182 $6,436.11 718274 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable WESTMORELAND, EVAN $240.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 0056 11/19/2018 Office AV Rack Wiring Project $240.00 718275 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Abracosa, Ritchie $750.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1635 11/16/2018 Teen Center security deposit refund, 10.20.18, Permit R1635 $750.00 718276 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Albert Salvador $108.16 Invoice Date Description Amount AlbertS111318 11/14/2018 Reimbursement for IPhone 7 Smart Battery Case $108.16 718277 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Blach Construction $10,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount RefundB2018-0384 11/14/2018 Refund 10123 N Wolfe Rd B-2018-0384- TCO Bond $10,000.00 718278 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Chandra Reddy Devireddy $5,500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount RefundB2017-0196 11/14/2018 Refund 10561 Wunderlich Drive B-2017-0196- TCO Bond $5,500.00 718279 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable Barron Builders Inc. $5,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount RefundB2017-0741 10/29/2018 TCO Refund 20525 Mariani Blvd. - B-2017-0741 $5,000.00 Type Check Totals:66 Transactions $545,233.56 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 9 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 89 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference EFT 28128 11/19/2018 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT $32,801.55 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 CA - CA State Tax pp 10/27-11/9/18 $32,801.55 28129 11/19/2018 Open Accounts Payable IRS $107,786.14 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/09/2018 FED - Federal Tax pp 10/27-11/9/18 $107,786.14 28130 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable P E R S $123,848.15 Invoice Date Description Amount 11092018 11/19/2018 CalPERS 10/27-11/9/18 $123,848.15 28131 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable P E R S $644.87 Invoice Date Description Amount 11012018 11/19/2018 CalPERS 11/1-11/30/18 Council $644.87 28132 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable GULU SAKHRANI $15.87 Invoice Date Description Amount GuluS110118 11/19/2018 Travel Reimbursement for CACEO Class on 11/01/18 $15.87 28133 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable KIRSTEN SQUARCIA $60.00 Invoice Date Description Amount KirstenS111618 11/16/2018 Satellite Phone Services for Kirsten 7/29-10/28 $60.00 28134 11/21/2018 Open Accounts Payable SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP $350.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 257842 10/23/2018 AC2 #501 Legal Fees 2018/05 $350.00 Type EFT Totals:7 Transactions $265,506.58 Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 66 $545,233.56 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 66 $545,233.56 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 7 $265,506.58 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 7 $265,506.58 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 73 $810,740.14 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 10 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 90 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Total 73 $810,740.14 $0.00 Grand Totals: Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 66 $545,233.56 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 66 $545,233.56 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 7 $265,506.58 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 7 $265,506.58 $0.00 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 73 $810,740.14 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 73 $810,740.14 $0.00 Thursday, November 29, 2018Pages: 11 of 11user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/17/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/23/2018 91 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4859 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/10/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 30, 2018 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:A – Draft Resolution B – AP Report Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Accept Accounts Payable for the period ending November 30, 2018 Adopt Resolution No. 19-017 accepting Accounts Payable for the period ending November 30, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™92 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING November 30, 2018 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in the attached Payment Register. CERTIFIED: _____________________________ Zach Korach, Finance Manager PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February, 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor, City of Cupertino 93 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference Main Account - Main Checking Account Check 718280 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable 4LEAF INC $11,643.20 Invoice Date Description Amount J118100 09/25/2018 On Call Building Inspection Services - 08/01 - 08/31 $6,883.20 J1181QQ 11/26/2018 On Call Building Inspection Services - 10/01-10/31 $4,760.00 718281 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable AARABI RAJESHWARAN $40.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $40.00 718282 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable ABOLI JAYDEEP RANADE $175.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $175.00 718283 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Action Research $6,956.25 Invoice Date Description Amount AR18-1103 10/31/2018 CBSM Project $6,956.25 718284 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable ADVANTAGE GRAFIX $1,478.83 Invoice Date Description Amount 42605 11/14/2018 100 door hangers for outreach to homes next to creek $194.66 42632 11/21/2018 410 door hangers for organics cart outreach pilot $262.29 42633 11/21/2018 BAAG CHINESE $1,021.88 718285 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALHAMBRA & SIERRA SPRINGS $300.59 Invoice Date Description Amount 4950379102718 10/27/2018 27837474950379 $117.93 4984729110318 11/03/2018 Water for QCC Staff $182.66 718286 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES $13,314.06 Invoice Date Description Amount 57456 11/08/2018 School Crossing Guard Svcs 10/21-11/3/18 $13,314.06 718287 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Alta Planning and Design $480.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 00-2017-271-8 11/16/2018 Cupertino, CA UPRR Trail Feasibility Study Services to 10/31/18 $480.16 718288 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CAL-WEST LIGHTING & SIGNAL MAINTENANCE INC $12,788.51 Invoice Date Description Amount 181159 11/21/2018 Job 18387 Stvs Creek / Stelling Traffic Pole Knockdown $3,483.28 181157 11/21/2018 Job 18385 DeAnza Blvd. / McClellan Traffic Pole Knockdown $4,996.54 181158 11/21/2018 Job 18386 DeAnza Blvd / McClellan Traffic Pole Knockdown $4,308.69 718289 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE $10,760.68 Invoice Date Description Amount 11162018 11/16/2018 5926633333 10/17/18-11/14/18 $10,760.68 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 1 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 94 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718290 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE $10,206.77 Invoice Date Description Amount 17056-15 11/19/2018 I-280 Channel Trail Feasibility Study Services Thru 10/31/18 $5,890.77 18050-4 11/27/2018 McClellan Trash Enclosure Services thru 10/31/2018 $464.00 18049-2 11/27/2018 McClellan Community Garden Services thru 10/31/18 $3,852.00 718291 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CEPEDA, GILBERT $410.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $410.00 718292 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY $23,400.00 Invoice Date Description Amount FWPS-4475180112 11/15/2018 Right of Way Title Services Orange & Byrne $23,400.00 718293 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CINTAS CORPORATION $426.36 Invoice Date Description Amount 630562849 11/20/2018 Uniforms/Safety Apparel $426.36 718294 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CLEAN HARBORS ENV SERVICES $1,637.29 Invoice Date Description Amount 1002586920 11/05/2018 Non-emergency spill cleanup $1,637.29 718295 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Colonial Life & Accident Insurance $175.83 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 4800 - *Colonial Products - Pre-Tax*$175.83 718296 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST $218.43 Invoice Date Description Amount 1155-11152018 11/15/2018 8155100050381155 11/20/18-12/19/2018 $218.43 718297 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Community Health Charities of California $257.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 4400 - Community Health Charities $257.00 718298 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable CSG CONSULTANTS INC $85,067.80 Invoice Date Description Amount 21601 11/14/2018 SO 2 McClellan Road Bikeway Improvements Phase 1 9/29-10/26/18 $2,850.00 21600 11/14/2018 SO 1 McClellan Rd Sidewalk Improvements Phase 2 $36,025.80 21696 11/19/2018 Design Svs Mas Agreement Contract #2018-007 9/29- 10/26/18 $2,475.00 B180902 - Rev. 1 09/17/2018 Building Plan Review Services 08/01 - 08/31 $43,717.00 718299 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS $225.00 Invoice Date Description Amount E 1597037 SJ 11/02/2018 Inspection: Passenger, Hydroelectric, PA-1 at 21111 Stevens Crk $225.00 718300 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable EWING IRRIGATION $308.61 Invoice Date Description Amount 6525232 11/14/2018 Trees&ROW: Klg Topper $308.61 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 2 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 95 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718301 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable GAME TIME $1,308.76 Invoice Date Description Amount PJI-0100795 11/14/2018 Grounds: Varian Park Dinos $1,308.76 718302 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable GARY HOLLOWAY $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11282018 11/27/2018 Tour Guide Services for Gary's Treasure Island Adventure Trip $300.00 718303 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable HMH ENGINEERS INC $20,795.70 Invoice Date Description Amount 35051 11/12/2018 Cupertino Bridge Maintenace $2,904.50 35034 11/09/2018 Payment 41 McClellan Rd Sidewalk Imp Ph II $2,881.20 35169 11/14/2018 McClellan Separated Bikeways PS&E - P1 $2,210.00 34799 09/11/2018 Signal Foundation Potholing Services Thru 9/1/18 $12,800.00 718304 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable HOLIDAY LIGHTS, LLC $5,975.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2338 10/26/2018 payment for holiday lights at Quinlan $5,975.00 718305 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable HU, POLLY $336.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $336.00 718306 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable IFPTE LOCAL 21 $1,876.88 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 4200 - Association Dues - CEA $1,876.88 718307 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable J.J.R. CONSTRUCTION INC $259,309.40 Invoice Date Description Amount 17-235 11/26/2018 Prog. Pay 2 $259,309.40 718308 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable JAIN, ARCHANA $148.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $148.00 718309 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Jarvis, Fay, Doporto & Gibson, LLP $16,136.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 12416 09/30/2018 Legal Services $2,960.00 12509 10/31/2018 Legal Services $11,314.00 12508 10/31/2018 Legal Services $120.00 12510 10/31/2018 Legal Fees Small Cell Cust Extenet 905 & Crown Castle 866 $1,742.00 718310 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable JEREMY DAVID SUTTON $1,125.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2018-11-08-02 11/08/2018 Live Digital Painting for Tree Lighting Event $1,125.00 718311 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable JOHN RAMOS $110.00 Invoice Date Description Amount JohnR071318 07/13/2018 Cell Phone Service Reimbursement; 6.14.18-7.13.18 $55.00 JohnR091318 09/13/2018 Cell Phone Service Reimbursement; 08.14.18- 09.13.18 $55.00 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 3 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 96 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718312 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN $195.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 8567-11092018 11/09/2018 Occ Health and Safety Serv Due 12/09/2018 $195.00 718313 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE $135.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1468317 10/31/2018 Professional Services October 2018 $135.00 718314 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable LOPEZ, COLLEEN $3,680.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 2018-3 11/14/2018 Housing Consultant 2018/10 $3,680.00 718315 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable MARIELA RODRIGUEZ $274.93 Invoice Date Description Amount Thkslunch2018 11/14/2018 Thanksgiving Lunch Reimbursement $274.93 718316 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable MONTGOMERY, KAE $336.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $336.00 718317 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CENTER $54.45 Invoice Date Description Amount 97004 11/26/2018 Grounds: Quinlan Project $54.45 718318 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC $79.04 Invoice Date Description Amount 8071240097 08/01/2018 CM Satellite Cell Phone Services 7/1-7/31 $79.04 718319 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable NICHOLAS ANDREA $191.00 Invoice Date Description Amount Nick111318 11/13/2018 Class A License Reimbursement $76.00 Nick111218 11/12/2018 Trees & ROW: Med Exam for Class A License $115.00 718320 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable NOSSAMAN, LLP $80.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 488849 11/13/2018 Legal Services $80.00 718321 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable OFFICE DEPOT $1,140.18 Invoice Date Description Amount 216306503001 10/10/2018 Office Supplies $14.04 213509237001 10/10/2018 Credit: Ink-wrong size cartridge ($1,171.67) 214702576001 10/11/2018 Building Office Supplies 2018-10 $64.30 214699757001 10/08/2018 Building Office Supplies 2018-10 $177.47 215113341001 10/08/2018 Building Office Supplies 2018-10 ($13.28) 222390734001 10/23/2018 Creamer and Tea $106.60 213702516001 10/04/2018 Sr. Ctr. Hot Chocolate $74.04 221457767001 10/23/2018 General Supplies $45.59 215138466001 10/09/2018 Hidden Treasures & ACTIVE Supplies $28.47 222398671001 10/23/2018 Office Supplies $125.92 219703589001 10/19/2018 Packing Tape $26.37 219700934001 10/18/2018 copy paper $38.72 226012943001 11/01/2018 Office Supplies PW admin $19.16 218703287001 10/16/2018 Kitchen Supplies $5.89 226555162001 11/05/2018 Building Office Supplies 2018-11 $66.80 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 4 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 97 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 224586311001 10/30/2018 Coil, Cord, 12Ft, Black $6.55 225412952001 10/31/2018 Calendars, Sanitizer, Kleenex, Wipes, Lotion, Creamer, etc. $776.71 225412952003 11/06/2018 Calendar $17.65 225412952002 11/05/2018 Calendar 16X23 $107.86 222996984001 10/25/2018 Hot Chocolate $148.08 231768471001 11/14/2018 Batteries, Scissors $25.69 225085467001 10/31/2018 Planners $40.41 224747205001 10/30/2018 PAD SCREEN $24.82 224738179001 10/30/2018 Binders & File Folders $92.15 223124632001 10/25/2018 Forks $7.98 221834880001 10/23/2018 MousePad, Paperthermal, Planner $47.35 221834723001 10/22/2018 Mouse Ergo. Vertical $108.99 220218086001 10/18/2018 Printing Calculator $37.27 226854085001 11/05/2018 Folder, File $65.79 226858083001 11/05/2018 Labels $24.46 718322 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Operating Engineer #3 $1,512.16 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 4100 - Union Dues $1,512.16 718323 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC WEST SECURITY INC $231.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 10935 10/01/2018 BBF Golf Maintenance Security $231.00 718324 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable PAUL SAPUDAR $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount PaulS111418 11/14/2018 Cell Phone Svc Reimursement; 10.15.18-11.14.18 $55.00 718325 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable PERS Long Term Care Program $30.28 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 0530 - PERS Long Term Care $30.28 718326 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable PG&E $24.74 Invoice Date Description Amount 7100-11142018 11/14/2018 7166121710-10 /08/2018-11/06/2018 $24.74 718327 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable PROJECT SENTINEL $7,954.22 Invoice Date Description Amount PS Q1 FY1819 11/08/2018 BMR AHF Rental Medition Q1 FY18-19 $7,954.22 718328 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable RANES-GOLDBERG, MONICA $640.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $640.00 718329 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable RAO, GEETHA $420.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $420.00 718330 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable REDGWICK CONSTRUCTION CO $19,601.66 Invoice Date Description Amount 1-2017-01.04 11/27/2018 Paymnt 1 McClellan Road Separated Bikeways-Phase 1 $19,601.66 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 5 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 98 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718331 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable RELIANCE FOUNDRY $5,450.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 35894 10/12/2018 Sales Order 19211 McClellan Rd Bike Corridor $5,450.00 718332 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable RUBY CHEN $296.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $296.00 718333 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Sapudar, Lauren $55.00 Invoice Date Description Amount LaurenS11282018 11/28/2018 Cell Phone Reimbursement November 2018 $55.00 718334 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE $398.01 Invoice Date Description Amount 3395814748 11/07/2018 Office Supplies $90.91 3395888098 11/08/2018 Office Supplies $195.48 3396560617 11/16/2018 Building Department Kitchen Supplies 2018-11 $111.62 718335 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable STARBIRD CONSULTING LLC $787.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 0022 11/13/2018 Regnart Road Environmental Consulting Payment 1 $787.50 718336 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable State Disbursement Unit $276.92 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 0100 - Child Support $276.92 718337 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable SUBURBAN PROPANE-1644 $120.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 234638 11/14/2018 Acct 1644-034249: Equipment Rental $120.00 718338 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF SF $1,183.78 Invoice Date Description Amount 2505204202 11/08/2018 Supplies for NOV Birthday Bash and Coffee $1,183.78 718339 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable The Consulting Team LLC $17,409.89 Invoice Date Description Amount 870 10/02/2018 Planning Meeting $17,409.89 718340 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable THE WILFRED JARVIS INSTITUTE $562.50 Invoice Date Description Amount 11032018AC 11/03/2018 Professional Services - Leadership and Organizational Effectiven $562.50 718341 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable THOMSON REUTERS - WEST $919.77 Invoice Date Description Amount 839174250 11/01/2018 Subscription 10.01.18-10.31.18 $919.77 718342 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable UNITED STORM WATER, INC.$76,104.72 Invoice Date Description Amount SW34627 10/31/2018 189 Vertical Wing-Gate ARS Screens installed in catch basins $76,104.72 718343 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable UNIVAR USA INC $154.24 Invoice Date Description Amount SJ901617 09/10/2018 Grounds: Gopher Gasser and Smoke Oil $2,334.19 SJ317288 09/17/2018 Grounds: Credit for payment on gopher gasser ($2,179.95) Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 6 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 99 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718344 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable YEE, ANITA $156.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $156.00 718345 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable ALTAP Electrical $186.70 Invoice Date Description Amount RefundB2018-1526 11/27/2018 Building Permit Refund $186.70 718346 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Bernard, Margaret $45.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 103018 11/20/2018 Teen Center Refund $45.00 718347 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable California Cricket Academy $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 593630 11/20/2018 Refunding security deposit for Cupertino Room, November 17, 2018 $500.00 718348 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Cupertino-Hsinchu Sister City Association $500.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 586202 11/20/2018 Refunding security deposit for Cupertino Room, November 2, 2018 $500.00 718349 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Hestia Home, LLC $4,900.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 205805 11/28/2018 21800 Almaden Ave - 10% FP Bond & Dev Maint Dpst - 205805 $4,900.00 718350 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Lawrence, Judy $74.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499859 11/27/2018 Sr Ctr Trip Refunds $74.00 718351 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Lederer, Lee $74.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499853 11/27/2018 Sr Ctr Trip Refunds $74.00 718352 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Miller, Francoise $62.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499855 11/27/2018 Sr Ctr Trip Refunds $62.00 718353 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Santa Clara Valley Quilt Association $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1389 11/20/2018 Social Room security deposit refund, 11.13.18, Permit R1389 $300.00 718354 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Santha Chittajallu $5,000.00 Invoice Date Description Amount Refund 14110014 11/27/2018 Building TCO Bond Refund $5,000.00 718355 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Spitsen, Paul $62.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499857 11/27/2018 Sr Ctr Trip Refunds $62.00 718356 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Tian Hong Foundation $300.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 138 11/26/2018 Social Room security deposit refund, 12.22.18, Permit R138 $300.00 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 7 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 100 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 718357 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable Ushiba, Julie $7.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 499851 11/27/2018 Sr Ctr Class Refunds $7.00 718358 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable YANG, LI $176.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1463019 02/28/2018 QCC Class Refunds $176.00 718359 11/30/2018 Open Accounts Payable IFPTE LOCAL 21 $2.89 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018PaulT 11/23/2018 4200 - Association Dues - CEA $2.89 Type Check Totals:80 Transactions $640,389.69 EFT 28135 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable Employment Development $1,513.76 $1,513.76 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 SDI - State Disability Insurance $1,513.76 28136 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable PERS-457K $14,588.05 $14,588.05 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 3200 - *PERS Deferred Comp*$14,588.05 28137 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable ARCHANA PANDA $175.00 $175.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $175.00 28138 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable CP6CPC, LLC $5,825.08 $5,825.08 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 12012018 12/01/2018 Rent, December 2018 $5,825.08 28139 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable CRUZ, RAYCHEL $4,407.50 $4,407.50 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $4,407.50 28140 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable Eflex Group, Inc $4,381.75 $4,381.75 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 4700 - *FSA Employee Health*$4,381.75 28141 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable GOLDFARB & LIPMAN $5,254.50 $5,254.50 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 128940 11/17/2018 Legal Services $2,448.50 128939 11/17/2018 Legal Fees for Aviare Apts 2018/10 $2,806.00 28142 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable GRACE DUVAL $360.00 $360.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $360.00 28143 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable HILL, JENNIFER $111.00 $111.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $111.00 28144 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable ICMA Retirement Trust-457 $1,827.54 $1,827.54 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 3100 - *ICMA Deferred Comp*$1,827.54 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 8 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 101 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 28145 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable JEFF ORDWAY $36.00 $36.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11142018 11/14/2018 Cell Phone Service Reimbursement (10/13/18 to 11/14/18) $36.00 28146 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable KONGBOON, SA-AD $273.00 $273.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $273.00 28147 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE E. KERN, INC. $8,898.23 $8,898.23 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 38534 08/29/2018 Legal Services $4,068.00 38895 11/16/2018 Legal Services $4,830.23 28148 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable M-GROUP $8,001.11 $8,001.11 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 1000703 10/31/2018 For professional services through 10/31/2018 $604.00 1000704 10/31/2018 For professional services through 10/31/2018 $929.25 1000705 10/31/2018 For professional services through 10/31/2018 $2,033.60 1000550 08/31/2018 For professional services through 2018 $1,605.50 1000551 08/31/2018 For professional services through 08/31/2018 $2,182.00 1000628 09/30/2018 For professional services through 09/30/2018 $411.76 1000629 09/30/2018 For professional services through 09/30/2018 $235.00 28149 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable MERCHANT, TEJAL $328.00 $328.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $328.00 28150 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable MOSLEY, CHAD , E $40.00 $40.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount ChadM111418 11/14/2018 11/14/18 APWA Dam Splillway Luncheon $40.00 28151 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable National Deferred (ROTH)$3,345.77 $3,345.77 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 3010 - Nationwide Roth $3,345.77 28152 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable National Deferred Compensatin $27,600.76 $27,600.76 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 3000 - *Nationwide Deferred Compensatio $27,600.76 28153 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable PARS/City of Cupertino $3,136.91 $3,136.91 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 11232018 11/23/2018 3321 - PARS Employee *$3,136.91 28154 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable PROFESSIONAL TURF MGMNT INC $17,060.00 $17,060.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 874 11/05/2018 Scenic Circle Gate $60.00 873 11/26/2016 Golf Course Maintenance $17,000.00 28155 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP $28,489.20 $28,489.20 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 257895 10/23/2018 Legal Services $11,322.30 257843 10/23/2018 Legal Services $12,850.50 257844 10/23/2018 Legal Services $4,316.40 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 9 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 102 Number Date Status Void Reason Reconciled/ Voided Date Source Payee Name Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Difference 28156 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable SWICK, MELISSA $840.00 $840.00 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount 112718 11/27/2018 November payment $840.00 28157 11/30/2018 Reconciled 11/30/2018 Accounts Payable THOMAS LEUNG $1,449.44 $1,449.44 $0.00 Invoice Date Description Amount Travel102918 11/29/2018 Reimbursement $1,449.44 Type EFT Totals:23 Transactions $137,942.60 $137,942.60 $0.00 Main Account - Main Checking Account Totals Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 80 $640,389.69 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 80 $640,389.69 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 0 $0.00 $0.00 Reconciled 23 $137,942.60 $137,942.60 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 23 $137,942.60 $137,942.60 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 80 $640,389.69 $0.00 Reconciled 23 $137,942.60 $137,942.60 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 103 $778,332.29 $137,942.60 Grand Totals: Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 80 $640,389.69 $0.00 Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 80 $640,389.69 $0.00 EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 0 $0.00 $0.00 Reconciled 23 $137,942.60 $137,942.60 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 23 $137,942.60 $137,942.60 All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 80 $640,389.69 $0.00 Reconciled 23 $137,942.60 $137,942.60 Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00 Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 103 $778,332.29 $137,942.60 Tuesday, December 04, 2018Pages: 10 of 10user: Zeng Wang Payment Register **LIVE** Cupertino **LIVE** From Payment Date: 11/24/2018 - To Payment Date: 11/30/2018 103 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4909 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/23/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Annual adoption of Pension Trust Investment Policy Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Pension Investment Policy Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Annual adoption of Pension Trust Investment Policy Adopt Resolution No. 19-018 accepting the City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™104 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Annual adoption of Pension Trust Investment Policy. Recommended Action Adopt Resolution accepting the City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust. Description The Audit Committee is recommending full implementation of the policy as revised and approved in its Audit Committee Meeting held December 11, 2018. Discussion The California Government Code requires a statement of investment policy to be reviewed and adopted by the City Council on at least an annual basis. This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City’s Pension Trust’s idle cash. Upon adoption of the Resolution Accepting the City Pension Trust Investment Policy, the Policy (Attachment B), will be effective immediately. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Zach Korach, Deputy Treasurer Reviewed by: Kristina Alfaro, City Treasurer Approved for Submission by: Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attachments: A - Draft Resolution B - Investment Policy 105 RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCEPTING THE CITY INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE PENSION TRUST WHEREAS, the City’s Pension Trust, established to benefit the general public, has available funds to invest in accordance with principles of sound treasury management; and WHEREAS, the City invests funds in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Section 53600; and WHEREAS, the City’s Audit Committee reviewed and accepted the attached City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust on December 11, 2018. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino accepts the attached City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust dated February 5, 2019. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _______________________ ______________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor, City of Cupertino 106 Version Jan. 2019 Pension Trust Investment Policy Citywide Policy Manual Attachments: N/A Effective Date: February 5, 2019 Responsible Department: Administrative Services Related Policies & Notes: N/A Investment Policy Statement Overview The City has established a Section 115 Trust with PARS to assist in stabilizing the potential impact of pension cost volatility on the City’s operating budget. The City intends to use the Section 115 Trust to pre-fund pension costs and proactively address the unfunded liability. The City’s goal is to have sufficient assets in the trust to increase the funded status to over 80% within 20 years, as well as fund the difference between a 7.0% and 6.25% discount rate. Executive Summary Account Name: City of Cupertino Pension Trust Account Number: 6746050100 Investment Authority: Full Investment Authority Current Assets: $8 Million (February 2019) Time Horizon: Long-Term Target Rate of Return: 7% Communication Schedule: Meetings will be conducted at least twice per year U.S. Bank Portfolio Manager: Rick Rosenthal richard.rosenthal@usbank.com 213-443-1848 U.S. Bank Relationship Manager : Carolyn Cox carolyn.cox@usbank.com 415-677-3603 107 Version Jan. 2019 Investment Objective: ‘Balanced’ This investment objective is designed to provide a moderate amount of current income with moderate growth of capital. Investors should have sufficient tolerance for price and return volatility and substantial periodic declines in investment value. This objective is recommended for investors with a long-term time horizon. The strategic asset allocation ranges and tactical targets for this objective are listed below: Investment Guidelines Overview This document defines the investment policy, guidelines and performance objectives applicable to the assets of The City of Cupertino’s Pension Trust. The goal of this Policy is to create an investment framework within which the assets can be actively yet prudently managed. The purpose of this document is threefold.  First, it will set forth an investment structure for managing the Portfolio assets. This structure is expected to produce an appropriate level of overall diversification and total investment return over the investment time horizon.  Second, it will serve as to encourage effective communications between the organization and parties involved with investment management decisions.  Third, these guidelines will provide a framework to measure ongoing investment performance. Within the constraints imposed by these policies, Investment Managers are expected to comply with all applicable fiduciary and due diligence requirements under the “prudent investor” rules, which state: “Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived.” All applicable laws, rules and regulations from various local, state, federal and international political entities that may impact the Portfolio are to be adhered to. Asset Class Range Benchmark Target Fixed Income 20-40% 29% Equities 50-70% 63% Real Estate 0-15% 5% Commodities 0-10% 2% Cash 0-10% 1% 108 Version Jan. 2019 Diversification Your Portfolio Manager is responsible for maintaining the balance between the various asset classes based on the investment objective’s strategic asset allocation. As a general policy, the Investment Manager will maintain reasonable diversification at all times by asset class, credit quality, issuer, sector, industry, and country. The following parameters shall be adhered to in managing the portfolio: Fixed Income Assets  The fixed income investments are to maintain intermediate -term average weighted duration, between three-seven years.  At the time of purchase, no single fixed income issuer shall exceed 2% of the total market value of the Portfolio, with the exception of U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.  The direct high-yield portion shall constitute no more than 10% of the total market value of the Portfolio. Equity & Growth Assets  The domestic equity investments are expected to be diversified at all times by size, industry, sector, and style (Large Cap, Mid Cap, and Small Cap).  At the time of purchase, no individual equity security shall exceed 2% of the total market value of the Portfolio.  The international equity investments (including emerging markets) shall constitute no more than 20% of the total market value of the Portfolio  The real estate investments shall be captured through the use of diversified mutual funds or ETFs investing in REITs; and shall constitute no more than 15% of the total market value of the Portfolio .  The commodities investments shall be captured through the use of diversified mutual funds or ETFs; and shall constitute no more than 10% of the total market value of the Portfolio. Permitted Asset Classes and Security Types Fixed Income & Cash Equivalent Investments:  Domestic Certificates of Deposit (rated A-1/P-1 or better)  Domestic Commercial Paper (rated A-1/P-1 or better)  Floating Rate Notes  Money Market Mutual Funds  U.S. Treasury Bonds, Bills and Notes  U.S. Agency (and Instrumentality) Discount Notes, Notes, and Bonds  Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)  Municipal Bonds and Notes  Corporate Bonds  Mortgage-Backed Bonds (MBS)  Asset-Backed Bonds (ABS)  High-Yield Bonds (rated B-/B3 or better) 109 Version Jan. 2019  Dollar denominated Foreign Bonds and Notes  Bond Mutual Funds Equity Investments:  Common & Preferred Stocks  American Depository Receipts (ADRs)  Domestic and International Equity Mutual Funds (Open and Closed)  Emerging Market Equity Funds or Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) Alternative Investments:  Commodities Mutual Funds or Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs)  REIT Investment or Pooled Strategy or Fund of REITs  Registered Hedge Funds or Hedge Fund of Funds Prohibited Asset Classes and Transactions The Investment Manager is prohibited from purchasing or holding any of the following types of investments:  Partnerships unless investing in Master Limited Partnerships invested in a mutual fund and limited in scope and allocation of Portfolio based on asset class limitations of table above  Letter stock and other unregistered securities; commodities or other commodity contracts; and short sales or margin transactions  Investments in the equity securities of any company with a record of less than three years continuous operation, including the operation of any predecessor  Investments for the purpose of exercising control of management Duties and Responsibilities 1) CITY OF CUPERTINO AUDIT COMMITTEE a) Establish, approve, and maintain investment objectives, guidelines, and policies (including this Policy). b) Appoint Investment Managers who can be reasonably expected to adhere to the investment guidelines and meet the investment objectives as established. c) Monitor the investment performance of the Portfolio and compare actual investment performance relative to an appropriate benchmark index given the stated investment guidelines and objectives set forth in this Policy. d) Conduct a formal review of the Portfolio’s asset allocation, investment structure and performance annually or more frequently as the need arises. e) Periodically review the Portfolio performance against objectives. 2) CITY OF CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL a) Adopt the Policy by resolution of the City Council on an annual basis. 110 Version Jan. 2019 3) PORTFOLIO MANAGER The Portfolio Manager will be responsible for carrying out the activities related to the Portfolio in accordance with the Policy including: a) Manage the day-to-day investment of Portfolio assets in accordance with the Policy guidelines and objectives included herein. b) Exercise full investment discretion and prudence in the selection and diversification of investments. c) Promptly bring to the attention of the City Treasurer or designee any investment that is subsequently downgraded and fails to meet the quality guidelines, along with a recommendation of retention or disposal. d) Provide on a quarterly basis the following investment reporting: (i) Year-to-date rate of return (ii) Annualized one, three, five, etc. rates of return e) Provide annually to the City’s Audit Committee a commentary and analysis of investment performance to include an evaluation of the current and future investment environment and potential impact of the investment environment on achievement of investment objectives. Investment Policy Statement Review The City’s Audit Committee will review and the Cupertino City Council will adopt this Investment Policy Statement at least annually to determine whether stated investment objectives are still relevant and the continued feasibility of achieving the same. It is not expected that the Policy will change frequently. In particular, short-term changes in the financial markets should not require adjustments to the Policy. If at any time the Portfolio Manager finds the above guidelines too restrictive or possibly injurious to investment returns, they should communicate that information immediately to the City’s Audit Committee. Revisions: City Manager’s signature: _______________________________ Date: _______________________________ 111 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4910 Name: Status:Type:Consent Calendar Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/23/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Investment Portfolio, Wells Fargo Value Comparison Report, Supplemental Portfolio Analysis Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 Accept the Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™112 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3220 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 Recommended Action Accept the Treasurer’s Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 Discussion and Fiscal Impact The attached slides and investment portfolio listing comprise the Treasurer’s Investment Report. Together they show the composition of the portfolio; total portfolio yield in comparison to the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), the 1-year Treasury, and the 2- year Treasury; diversification within the government agency securities; and portfolio compliance with the City’s Investment Policy. For quarter ending December 31, 2018, the market value of the City’s portfolio total $137.8 million which is $0.1 million lower than last quarter. The portfolio’s average yield was 1.60% which is an increase from its 1.40% yield of the previous quarter ending September 30, 2018. The average length to maturity decreased from 0.46 to 0.36 years. The LAIF yield increased to 2.29% from last quarter’s yield of 2.06%. LAIF’s balance was $56.3 million which is in compliance with the City Investment Policy and state code. LAIF’s same- or next-day liquidity insures that the City is able to pay its obligations for the next six months and also provides strong liquidity in the short, intermediate, and long-term horizons. Market values on individual securities in the investment portfolio are provided by Wells Fargo Bank Institutional Trust Services using valuations from Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, Inc. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Zach Korach, Deputy City Treasurer Reviewed by: Kristina Alfaro, City Treasurer Approved by: Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attachments: A – Investment Portfolio, Wells Fargo Value Comparison Report, Supplemental Portfolio Analysis 113 City of Cupertino Investment Portfolio December 31, 2018 ACTIVITY DATE COUPON Annual PRICE ADJUSTED MATURITY MARKET UNREALIZED PURCHASE MATURITY DESCRIPTION RATE YTM YIELD PURCH COST VALUE VALUE PROFIT/LOSS SECURITIES MATURED 01/26/17 10/26/18 Agency notes - FHLB 1.20%1.20%1.20%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,998,020 (1,980) 11/23/16 10/31/18 US Treasury Note 0.75%1.04%1.04%99.444 3,001,439 3,000,000 2,996,820 (4,619) CITY PORTFOLIO CASH 12/31/18 Wells Fargo - Workers Comp Checking 25,939 25,939 25,939 12/31/18 Wells Fargo - Regular Checking 15,040,212 15,040,212 15,040,212 15,066,151 15,066,151 15,066,151 LAIF 12/31/18 LAIF - State Pool 2.29%2.29%2.29%56,259,630 56,259,630 56,259,630 MONEY MARKET FUNDS 12/31/18 Wells Fargo Advantage 100% Treasury 1.92%1.92%1.92%20,953,728 20,953,728 20,953,728 20,953,728 20,953,728 20,953,728 GOVERNMENT AGENCY NOTES 02/01/17 02/01/19 Agency notes - FFCB 1.30%1.30%1.30%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,997,660 (2,340) 05/07/15 02/27/19 Agency notes - FNMA 1.68%1.30%1.30%101.406 1,000,586 1,000,000 998,770 (1,816) 06/22/16 03/22/19 Agency notes - FHLMC 1.25%1.25%1.25%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,992,290 (7,710) 11/23/16 05/24/19 Agency notes - FHLMC 1.30%1.30%1.30%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,985,870 (14,130) 10/16/15 09/13/19 Agency notes - FHLB 2.00%1.21%1.21%103.000 2,010,756 2,000,000 1,990,940 (19,816) 06/22/17 10/11/19 Agency notes - FHLB 2.00%1.43%1.43%101.292 2,008,726 2,000,000 1,989,620 (19,106) 11/23/16 11/18/19 Agency notes - FFCB 1.10%1.36%1.36%99.238 1,995,498 2,000,000 1,972,280 (23,218) 03/30/16 12/30/19 Agency notes - FHLMC 1.50%1.50%1.50%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,966,580 (33,420) 06/30/16 12/30/19 Agency notes - FHLMC 1.02%1.02%1.02%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,952,450 (47,550) 06/22/17 05/16/20 Agency notes - FHLB 1.50%1.58%1.58%99.779 1,997,905 2,000,000 1,970,660 (27,245) 05/31/16 05/26/20 Agency notes - FHLMC 1.35%1.35%1.35%100.000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,966,740 (33,260) 05/26/16 05/26/20 Agency notes - FNMA 1.38%1.38%1.38%100.000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,968,040 (31,960) 06/30/16 06/30/20 Agency notes - FHLMC 1.50%1.50%1.50%100.000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,968,440 (31,560) 05/25/16 11/25/20 Agency notes - FNMA 1.50%1.50%1.50%100.000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,942,520 (57,480) 01/19/17 12/10/21 Agency notes - FHLB 2.63%1.90%1.88%103.363 3,060,726 3,000,000 3,008,130 (52,596) 36,074,197 36,000,000 35,670,990 (403,207) US TREASURY SECURITIES 03/31/17 03/31/19 US Treasury Note 1.25%1.25%1.25%100.000 1,000,000 1,000,000 997,150 (2,850) 03/31/17 07/31/19 US Treasury Note 0.88%1.32%1.32%98.969 2,992,302 3,000,000 2,971,170 (21,132) 09/12/16 08/15/19 US Treasury Note 0.75%0.84%0.84%99.750 1,998,936 2,000,000 1,977,420 (21,516) 03/30/17 09/30/19 US Treasury Note 1.00%1.42%1.42%98.969 1,993,840 2,000,000 1,976,320 (17,520) 05/07/15 04/30/20 US Treasury Note 1.38%1.54%1.54%99.203 1,995,744 2,000,000 1,969,220 (26,524) 9,980,822 10,000,000 9,891,280 (89,542) Total Managed Portfolio 138,334,528 138,279,509 137,841,779 (492,749) Average Yield 1.60% Average Length to Maturity (in years) 0.36 Duration as of 12/31/18 (calculated by US Bank)0.695 TRUST PORTFOLIO Institutional MM Account Wells Fargo Bank Secured 0.75%0.75%48,585 48,585 48,585 BOND RESERVE PORTFOLIO Bond Lease Pymt Acct Goldman Sachs Financial Sq Money Mkt 0.00%0.00%433,619 433,619 433,619 Bond Reserve Acct Goldman Sachs Financial Sq Money Mkt 0.00%0.00%1,630,726 1,630,726 1,630,726 Total Bond Reserve Portfolio 2,064,345 2,064,345 2,064,345 114 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 12/31/2018CITY OF CUPERTINO 01/05/2019 04:19:47 PM ESTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition UnitsACCOUNT: 16737400 CITY OF CUPERTINONET CASHNET CASH.0000$.00$.00$.00 .00.0000.00U.S. DOLLARSSUBTOTAL.0000$.00$.00$.00 .00.0000.00CASH SWEEPPROPRIETARY FUNDSVP452000420,953,727.6200$20,953,727.62 $20,953,727.62$.00 .00.0000.00WELLS FARGO 100% TREASURY MONEY MARKET FUND - #008NON-PROPRIETARY FUNDS99299594448,585.4900$48,585.49 $48,585.49$.00 .00.0000.00WFB PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNTSUBTOTAL21,002,313.1100$21,002,313.11 $21,002,313.11$.00 .00.0000.00US GOVERNMENTUS TREASURY NOTES AND BONDS9128282B52,000,000.0000 08/15/2019 $1,977,420.00 $1,995,000.00 ($17,580.00) (.88) N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 08/15/16 0.750 08/15/2019912828K582,000,000.0000 04/30/2020 $1,969,220.00 $1,984,062.50 ($14,842.50) (.75) N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 04/30/15 1.375 04/30/2020912828TH33,000,000.0000 07/31/2019 $2,971,170.00 $2,969,062.50 $2,107.50 .07 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 07/31/12 0.875 07/31/2019912828TR12,000,000.0000 09/30/2019 $1,976,320.00 $1,979,375.00 ($3,055.00) (.15) N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 09/30/12 1.000 09/30/2019912828W971,000,000.0000 03/31/2019 $997,150.00 $1,000,000.00 ($2,850.00) (.29) N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 03/31/17 1.250 03/31/2019SUBTOTAL10,000,000.0000$9,891,280.00 $9,927,500.00 ($36,220.00) (.36).0000.00FEDERAL AGENCYGOVERNMENT AGENCIES3130ABGP52,000,000.0000 05/19/2020 $1,970,660.00 $1,995,580.00 ($24,920.00) (1.25) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK SER 0001313376C943,000,000.0000 12/10/2021 $3,008,130.00 $3,100,890.00 ($92,760.00) (2.99) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 11/04/11 2.625 12/10/2021Page 1115 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 12/31/2018CITY OF CUPERTINO 01/05/2019 04:19:47 PM ESTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition Units313378UP42,000,000.0000 10/11/2019 $1,989,620.00 $2,025,840.00 ($36,220.00) (1.79) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 04/11/12 2.000 10/11/2019313383VN82,000,000.0000 09/13/2019 $1,990,940.00 $2,060,000.00 ($69,060.00) (3.35) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 08/12/13 2.000 09/13/20193133EG5Q43,000,000.0000 02/01/2019 $2,997,660.00 $3,000,000.00 ($2,340.00) (.08) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED FARM CREDIT BK DTD 02/01/17 1.300 02/01/20193133EGJ302,000,000.0000 11/18/2019 $1,972,280.00 $1,984,760.00 ($12,480.00) (.63) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED FARM CREDIT BK DTD 11/18/16 1.100 11/18/20193134G8S833,000,000.0000 12/30/2019 $2,966,580.00 $3,000,000.00 ($33,420.00) (1.11) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE SER 00053134G9G433,000,000.0000 12/30/2019 $2,952,450.00 $3,000,000.00 ($47,550.00) (1.59) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE3134G9MU83,000,000.0000 05/24/2019 $2,985,870.00 $3,000,000.00 ($14,130.00) (.47) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP DTD 05/31/16 1.300 05/24/20193134G9MW42,000,000.0000 05/26/2020 $1,966,740.00 $2,000,000.00 ($33,260.00) (1.66) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE SER 00003134G9SB43,000,000.0000 03/22/2019 $2,992,290.00 $3,000,000.00 ($7,710.00) (.26) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE3134G9SK42,000,000.0000 06/30/2020 $1,968,440.00 $2,000,000.00 ($31,560.00) (1.58) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE SER 00013136FTP371,000,000.0000 02/27/2019 $998,770.00 $1,014,055.00 ($15,285.00) (1.51) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED NATL MTG ASSN DTD 02/27/12 1.680 02/27/20193136G3QB42,000,000.0000 05/26/2020 $1,968,040.00 $2,000,000.00 ($31,960.00) (1.60) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED NATL MTG ASSN DTD 05/26/16 1.375 05/26/20203136G3QQ13,000,000.0000 11/25/2020 $2,942,520.00 $3,000,000.00 ($57,480.00) (1.92) N/A N/A.0000.00FED NATL MTG ASSN SER 0002SUBTOTAL36,000,000.0000$35,670,990.00 $36,181,125.00 ($510,135.00) (1.41).0000.00ACCOUNT 16737400 TOTAL 67,002,313.1100$66,564,583.11 $67,110,938.11 ($546,355.00) (.81).0000.00GRAND TOTAL67,002,313.1100$66,564,583.11 $67,110,938.11 ($546,355.00) (.81).0000.00END OF REPORTPage 2116 Audit Committee Meeting Treasurer’s Investment Report Quarter Ending December 31, 2018 117 Portfolio Composition ●Total portfolio decreased $0.1 million over previous quarter from $137.9 to $137.8 million ●Average maturity decreased from 0.46 years to 0.36 years ●Average yield increased from 1.40% to 1.60% ●Duration decreased from 0.856 to 0.695 (Information provided by US Bank) LAIF 40.8% Cash 10.9% Money Market 15.20% Agency Notes 25.9% US Treasuries 7.2% 118 Yield Comparison 119 Agency Diversification ●Debt issued by federal credit agencies and fully backed by U.S. government guarantee but not its full faith and credit ●High credit rating –second only to Treasury bonds ●Maturity periods from 1 month to 15 years ●Agencies that can issue: o FHLMC –Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association (Freddie Mac) o FHLB –Federal Home Loan Bank o FNMA –Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) o FFCB –Federal Farm Credit Bureau FHLB 25.1% FHLMC 44.4% FNMA 16.6% FFCB 13.9% 120 Policy Compliance City of Cupertino December 31, 2018 Category Standard Comment Treasury Issues No limit Complies US Agencies No limit Complies Medium Term Corporate Bonds 30% with A rating Complies LAIF $65 million Complies Money Market Funds 20%Complies Maximum Maturities Up to 5 years Complies Per Issuer Max 10% (except for Treasuries and Agencies)Complies Bankers Acceptances 180 days & 40%Complies Commercial Paper 270 days & 25%Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30%Complies Repurchase Agreements 365 days Complies Reverse Repurchase Agreements Prohibited Complies 121 Cash Flow -Coverage The LAIF investment is $56.3 million and yielding 31 basis points lower than the 1-year Treasury bill. The City is able to pay its obligations for the next 6 months and overall liquidity is strong. NOTE:Derived from actual revenues and expenditures as a ratio of actual ending cash and cash equivalent balance for corresponding quarter end. 122 Cash Flow –Coverage Using three year historical trend data, the City estimates expenditures ($20.9 million) in excess of revenues ($17.5 million), resulting in an ending cash and cash equivalent balance of $95.7 million for the period ending March 31, 2019. 123 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-3567 Name: Status:Type:Second Reading of Ordinances Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/25/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Second reading and enactment of an ordinance to amend regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Draft Ordinance 19-2182 Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Second reading and enactment of an ordinance to amend regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission. Conduct the second reading and enact Ordinance No. 19-2182: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code, Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission” CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™124 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Second reading and enactment of an ordinance to amend regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission. Recommended Action Conduct the second reading and enact Ordinance No. 19-2182: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending regulations in Title 2, Administration and Personnel of the Municipal Code, Chapter 2.80, to allow up to five (5) members for the Fine Arts Commission” (Attachment A). Discussion On January 15, 2018, the City Council conducted the first reading of Ordinance No. 19-2182 (5-0). During the first reading, Council did not direct any modifications to the proposed Ordinance. No changes have been made to the ordinance since the first reading. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _________________ Prepared by: Catarina Kidd, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development Approved by: Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attachment: A. Ordinance No. 19-2182 125 ORDINANCE NO. 19-2182 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING REGULATIONS IN TITLE 2, ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.80, TO ALLOW UP TO FIVE (5) MEMBERS FOR THE FINE ARTS COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Section 2.80.010 of the Cupertino Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.80.010 Established. The Fine Arts Commission of the City is established. The Fine Arts Commission shall consist of five members, none of whom shall be officials or employees of the City, nor cohabit with as defined by law, nor be related by blood or marriage to any member of the Commission, the City Manager or the staff person(s) assigned to this Commission. At least three members shall be City of Cupertino residents. Members of the Fine Arts Commission shall be appointed by the City Council. Membership will be drawn to represent the arts, citizens and business community on an approximately equal basis. 2. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City within 15 days after its adoption, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933, and shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 15th day of January, 2019 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 5th day of February, 2019 by the following vote: Vote: Members of the City Council Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: APPROVED: 126 Ordinance No. 19-2182 Page 2 PC/DIR/O/OA 2 ______________________________ ______________________________ Grace Schmidt Steven Scharf City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 127 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4912 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/24/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Approval of a Legal Services Contract for City Attorney Services with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger. Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A – Request for Proposal B - Agreement Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Approval of a Legal Services Contract for City Attorney Services with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger. 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger for City Attorney Services in the amount of $600,000 annually. 2. Approve Budget Modification Number 1819-038 reducing the Administration-City Attorney budget by $770,889. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™128 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Approval of a Legal Services Contract for City Attorney Services with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger. Recommended Action 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Shute Mihaly and Weinberger for City Attorney Services in the amount of $600,000 annually. 2. Approve Budget Modification Number 1819-038 reducing the Administration- City Attorney budget by $770,889. Discussion On June 5, 2018, as part of the 2018-19 Fiscal Year Final Budget Hearing and Adoption (FY19), City budget staff were given direction by the City Council through a straw vote to conduct analysis on the possible outsourcing of the City Attorney’s Office (CAO). In May of 2018 the former City Attorney was placed on paid Administrative Leave. City Council then placed the Senior Assistant City Attorney in an Acting capacity per the City’s Municipal Code 2.18.070. In October 2018 the former City Attorney accepted a job with another agency, creating a vacancy. In November 2018 the Administrative Services Director provided City Council with analysis regarding the outsourcing of the CAO that consisted of cost comparisons with neighboring cities that have both an in house or contract city attorney and service level survey of those cities contracting out these services. That analysis concluded that the City could save a substantial amount by contracting out city attorney services, largely due to the finding that cities with contracted legal services have variable costs. The characteristic of these variable costs is that on a unit basis, costs are fixed but the total varies depending on the workload. In the fixed scenario, for an in-house attorney, regardless of the workload the costs would still exist and with the variable model costs could increase or decrease based on demand. Potential savings would need to be weighed against possible impacts to service levels. Council then directed staff to gather additional feedback on customer service levels from city managers and elected officials for cities with outsourced city attorney services. 129 In December 2018, staff received direction from the City Council to proceed with a Request for Proposal (RFP) for contracted city attorney services. On December 21, 2018, the RFP (attachment A) was sent out to the following ten firms; 1. Atkinson Farasyn 2. Berliner Cohen 3. Best Best & Krieger 4. Burke Willans Sorenson 5. Goldfarb & Lipman 6. Meyers Nave Riback Silver & Wilson 7. Renne Public Law Group 8. Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger 9. Siegel McClure Flegel 10. Sloan Sakai Yeung & Wong Three firms responded, Burke, Williams & Sorenson, Meyers Nave Riback Silver & Wilson, and Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger and all were invited to interview. On January 8, 2019 a closed session was held for the City Council to interview the three firms. City Council unanimously selected Shute Mihaly & Weinberger (SMW) with Heather Minner to serve as City Attorney and Richard Taylor to serve as Assistant City Attorney. Staff was directed to negotiate the contract and bring it back to a future City Council meeting for approval, to retain the services of the Legal Services Manager and manage the transition of the existing Senior Assistant City Attorney, whose position was being eliminated and to allow for a four week transition period. Lastly, staff was directed to return to Council with options for the current leased space where the City Attorney’s Office is located. Follow up on the last two items will come before Council at a later date. SMW was selected based on its experience working exclusively with government agencies, nonprofits and community groups, their areas of legal expertise, and their approach to staffing the City Attorney with lawyers from their firm serving exclusively as City Attorney for only one City at a time. Heather Minner will however continue to serve as Assistant City Attorney to Half Moon Bay. The Assistant City Attorney Richard Taylor, will continue to serve as City Attorney for the City of Saratoga. SMW also proposed the lowest costs. The contract with SMW is based on a monthly retainer of 200 hours at $50,000 per month. Hours over this amount in a given month will be billed at the listed rates in the agreement. In months when the City does not meet the 200 hours, the fee will be reduced by $250 for each hour less than the 200 hours worked that month. The contract excludes the following special services as outlined in the agreement these exclusions are consistent with the other two proposals received by the City:  Code enforcement administrative proceedings and litigation.  Litigation services, including arbitration, mediation and administrative proceedings before agencies other than the City. 130  Real estate transactions;  The Firm’s existing special matters for the City, specifically advice related to the Vallco project and Lehigh Quarry, and CEQA advice related to the Cupertino Village Hotel project, the Westport project, Apple Campus 2, and De Anza Hotel.  CEQA and land use advice on major development applications, specific plans, and general plan amendments.  Advice related to ballot measures.  Special projects assigned by the City Council.  Reimbursable Matters and  Recovery Matters. Heather Minner will be onsite two days a week for seven hours per day but will be accessible via phone and email on days when she is not onsite. Richard Taylor will attend City Council and executive meetings if Heather Minner is unavailable. Sustainability Impact No sustainability impact. Fiscal Impact The approval of Budget Modification Number 1819-038 is anticipated to result in reduced costs in salary and benefits of approximately $729,784 due to the elimination of all but one position in the CAO as described in the following chart: No other budget adjustments are requested at this time, it is projected that savings in contract services will be sufficient to cover the costs of the new contract estimates at $250,000 thru the end of the current fiscal year. _____________________________________ Position Salary Benefits Total Costs Projected Costs Projected Savings City Attorney 255,601$ 99,650$ 355,251$ 110,416$ 244,835$ Sr. Assistant City Attorney 214,212$ 87,924$ 302,136$ 251,712$ 50,424$ Assistant City Attorney 176,606$ 72,439$ 249,045$ -$ 249,045$ Deputy City Attorney (Limited Term, 2 Years Remain) 127,073$ 58,406$ 185,479$ -$ 185,479$ Legal Services Manager 99,142$ 50,219$ 149,361$ 149,361$ -$ Total 872,634$ 368,639$ 1,241,273$ 511,489$ 729,784$ 131 Prepared by: Kristina Alfaro, Director of Administrative Services Approved for Submission by: Timm Borden Interim City Manager Attachments: A – Request for Proposal B - Agreement 132 CITY OF CUPERTINO Request for Proposals Contract City Attorney Services December 21, 2018 133 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 1 The City Council of the City of Cupertino is requesting interested full-service law firms with experience advising and representing California municipalities to submit Statements of Qualifications and Proposals to provide contract legal services as City Attorney to the City. Background City and City Government. Cupertino is a General Law City operating under a Council- Manager form of government which serves a community of just over 64,000 residents. Five Councilmembers elected at large for a four year term and a two-term limit appoint the City Manager, who is responsible for the strategic direction and day -to-day operations of the City. The City Council appoints and is supported by ten Commissions and six Committees covering a variety of subject matters. Municipal services prov ided include, streets, parks, storm drains and facilities maintenance, engineering, community development, recreation and administrative services. Police services are contracted with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office. Fire protection is provided by the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District. Garbage and recycling services are also contracted. The City is fiscally strong, in part due to conservative and prudent fiscal planning. With a one-year budget cycle, the City’s current total annual budget is $131.7 million (including CIP), which funds 248 full-time equivalent positions. The Mission of the City of Cupertino is to provide exceptional service, encourage the community engagement, and support the values of education, innovation and collaboration. The City Council has regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month which begin at 6:45 p.m. In addition, the Council may schedule closed sessions, joint sessions or study sessions before, during, or after the regular meetings of Council. The work of the City Attorney. Appointed by the Council, the City Attorney reports to the City Council and provides legal support to the City Council, City Manager and Department Directors. The successful applicant must possess a strong generalist background in municipal law with emphasis on governmental issues, contracts, transportation, public works, planning and land use. She or he will advise on issues regarding resolutions, ordinances, leases, zoning, code enforcement, contracts, policies, procedures, sale and purchase agreements, numerous planning-related matters, Brown Act, conflict of interest, ethics, Public Records Act and various agreements relevant to construction and municipal government. The City Attorney also monitors changes in pertinent state and federal legislation, regulations, case law and updates the Council and City Manager as appropriate. 134 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 2 Upon request by the City Manager or Council, the City Attorney may be secondarily involved with outside legal counsel in matters related to employment law, workers’ compensation, labor negotiations, bond counsel, real estate transactions, government tort claims filed against the City and general liability litigation covered by the City’s Joint Powers Association (JPA) pool providers. These areas do not comprise the primary responsibilities of the City Attorney. However, the City Attorney will be apprised of such matters as is relevant to his or her duties as the City Attorney. The initial period of contract services will be one year with annual renewals contemplated based on a mutually agreeable working relationship. The City Attorney serve s at the pleasure of the Council and may be removed at any time with thirty-day notice by the vote of a majority of the City Council. 135 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 3 Request for Proposals (RFP) The City Council is seeking proposals from full-service law firms with substantial experience in advising and representing California cities for contract city attorney services on a set retainer fee basis. 1. Scope of services. Legal services shall include those generally understood within the field of municipal law to fall within the category of “general counsel” work and shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: 1.1 Representation of and advice to the Council, committees and commissions and all City officials in legal matters of municipal government 1.2 Attendance at all City Council meetings, unless excused by Mayor or Council (attendance at special meetings or study sessions and closed sessions) 1.3 Available to attend up to twelve meetings per year of commissions, public forums, training sessions such as commission trainings on the Brown Act 1.4 Consultation with City Manager, City staff, or authorized representatives to provide legal advice on proposed policies and activities 1.5 Implement directed communications by City Manager in response to members of the public and press/media 1.6 Preparation/review of all proposed ordinances, resolutions, contracts and other documents pertaining to City business 1.7 Code enforcement including filing complaints or administrative proceedings for litigation 1.8 Available to assist with personnel issues (excluding collective bargaining) in coordination with employment law counsel and with general liability claims and litigation in coordination with JPA legal counsel 1.9 Keep the Council and City Manager informed of the status of litigation involving City. Attorney shall submit a quarterly status report briefly outlining the status of each litigation, including code enforcement litigation. This status report shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth of the following months (April, July, October and January). Attorney shall also advise the City Council and City Manager of significant developments in litigation involving City as they occur. 136 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 4 1.10 Provide written legal opinions when requested by a majority of City Council 1.11 Assist with management of outside legal counsel and provide advice on available options for City Council or City Manager consideration 1.12 Manage all attorney correspondence reproductions, Public Records Act responses, mailing and miscellaneous expenses for communications with City 1.13 Assist City Council and appropriate staff in continuing to identify feasibility options toward implementing and achieving the goals, policies and objectives of the City Council 1.14 Consultation with individual City Council members on questions regarding City legal matters as it relates to them as Council members and City business 1.15 Available at City Hall for office hours twenty-four hours per week as is needed 1.16 Litigation services to include court and administrative proceedings of every type or nature and includes client conferences, file and report reviews, interviews, legal research, site visits and discussions with witnesses and experts prior to formal proceedings 1.17 Provide defense litigation for all actions and other proceedings brought against City, its elected officials, appointed officers and agents, except for JPA provided defense for general liability matters. In cases of unusual significance or complexity, retention of additional outside counsel can be approved by City Council 1.18 Prosecution for violations of the Municipal Code and enforcement litigation will be compensated at a predetermined billable rate plus costs customarily charged to clients 1.19 Legal services that constitute a special project as assigned by City Council would be provided on a contracted hourly basis beyond the established retainer fee 1.20 The City will provide temporary office space to a contract City Attorney for office hours at City Hall 1.21 City Council will conduct a review of the contract City Attorney performance 137 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 5 on a six-months basis for the first year of commencing service 1.22 Upon the termination of the Contract City Attorney Services Agreement, all files pursuant to City business and legal activities will be returned to the City within thirty days of notice of termination of the Agreement 1.23 The City will require the firm with which a contract is established, prior to commencement of work, to provide evidence of appropriate general liability, errors and omissions, malpractice insurance, Workers’ Compensation insurance, auto insurance, etc. to indemnify the City as needed 2. Firm’s qualifications. Please describe the firm’s qualifications for providing legal services. Include in your response: 2.1 Name of the partner(s)/associate(s) who would be designated as the contract City Attorney and her or his overall capabilities, qualifications, training and areas of expertise from the areas listed below. The name(s) of the person likely to be assigned to substitute for the City Attorney when he or she is not available. Include this attorney’s overall capabilities, qualifications, training and areas of expertise 2.2 Include resumes for all attorneys named 2.3 Requested information should include: a. Length of employment with firm b. Specialization c. Legal training d. Scholastic honors, awards and professional affiliations e. Date of admittance to California Bar f. Years of practice g. Municipal or other local public sector experience h. Years of experience as a City Attorney, with cities represented, and references for each city i. Knowledge of, and experience with California Municipal Law; what percentage of practice represents municipal law, and statement of other types of clientele represented j. Litigation experience and track record k. Knowledge and practice of law relating to land use and planning including CEQA, general plans, condemnation/eminent domain, development, zoning, real estate, environmental issues, hazardous waste, l. Knowledge and practice of law relating to telecommunications, code enforcement and, construction law/public works/prevailing wage 138 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 6 matters and other general municipal law related matters; m. Experience in the area of contracts, public purchasing and public/private partnerships, annexations n. Experience in the areas of taxes, fees and charges such as sewer and waste disposal service charges and rates o. Experience in public contracting for planning, construction, operations of public facilities such as street, water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage issues p. Experience in the preparation and review of memoranda, contracts, ordinances and resolutions q. Experience in the area of the Public Records Act, the Brown Act, the Political Reform Act and conflicts of interest, and Elections Code r. Experience in negotiating agreements and resolving disputes s. Whether the partner/principal or likely associates have ever been successfully sued for malpractice, been the subject of complaints filed with the State Bar, or had discipline imposed by the State Bar. Please provide any information on the nature of the incident, dates concluded and results of the situation t. Describe any work, whether by subject area or nature of work, which would not be covered by services rendered under the retainer fee u. Date by which contract City Attorney is available to commence full services to the City in the role of City Attorney v. Propose how contract City Attorney will achieve on-site office hours for twenty-four hours per week. Please disclose any political contributions or in-kind services or loans made to any member of the City of Cupertino Council, either directly or thru third parties within the last five years by the applicant law firm and all of its attorneys w. Please list all public clients for which your firm currently provides legal services. Please list all public clients for which your firm has provided services over the last five years and if necessary, private clients wherein a conflict may arise if the firm represents the City x. Please provide a list of companies in or doing business in the City of Cupertino for which you had or have provided services during the last 5 years that exceeded $20,000 y. Please provide a monthly retainer fee proposed for compensation for the above legal services. For those projects assigned by Council, please propose a billable hourly rate and specific expenses for which the firm will claim reimbursement including type and unit rate (i.e. rate for mileage, reproduction of documents, travel expenses). For your reference, attached to the RFP, are sections of the City of Cupertino Municipal Code related to provisions for retention and functions of the City Attorney (see 139 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 7 Attachment) Submittal Guidelines Firms who will be submitting a proposal should notify the City by no later December 28, 2018 and confirm their availability to meet on Tuesday January 8, 2018 beginning at 5:30 p.m. Proposals should be submitted no later than January 4, 2019. Proposals must be submitted:  Electronically to the interim City Manager, Amy Chan, at amyc@cupertino.org by 5:30 p.m. on Thursday January 3, 2019.  With one hard copy of the proposal to be received no later than Monday January 7, 2019. in a sealed envelope bearing the caption: “City of Cupertino– Proposal for City Attorney Legal Services” addressed to: Amy Chan, Interim City Manager City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave Cupertino, CA 95014 The City Council will conduct interviews with interested firms on January 8, 2019 beginning at 5:30 p.m. at the City of Cupertino City Hall. All inquiries regarding this RFP and current legal services in the City should be directed to Amy Chan, Interim City Manager, at the above address or by telephone at (408) 777- 1312 or by email at amyc@cupertino.org The City reserves the right to reject all proposals; to request additional information concerning any proposal; to accept or negotiate modifications to any proposal; to interview any proposer; and to waive any irregularities in any proposal submission deadline date in order to serve the best interests of the City. On behalf of the City of Cupertino, thank you for your consideration and efforts in responding to our RFP. 140 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 8 Attachment - City of Cupertino Municipal Code CHAPTER 2.18: CITY ATTORNEY Section 2.18.010 Office of the City Attorney established. 2.18.020 Function and duties. 2.18.030 Council–Attorney relations. 2.18.040 Attorney-staff relations. 2.18.050 Relations between Attorney and individual members of the public. 2.18.060 Bond. 2.18.070 Acting City Attorney. 2.18.080 Agreements on employment. 2.18.090 Assistants and employees. 2.18.100 Eligibility. 2.18.110 Suspension–Removal–Resignation. 2.18.010 Office of the City Attorney Established. A. The office of the City Attorney, as set forth in Government Code Section 36505, is established. The City Attorney shall be appointed by the City Council wholly on the basis of his or her qualifications. The City Attorney shall hold office for and during the pleasure of the City Council. B. The office of the City Attorney shall consist of the City Attorney and such assistants as may be authorized by the Council. C. The City Attorney shall administer the office, be responsible for the successful performance of its functions, and shall serve under the direct supervision and control of the Council as its legal advisor. D. The Council may retain or employ other attorneys, assistants, or special counsel as may be needed to take charge of any litigation or legal matters or to assist the City Attorney therein. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.020 Function and Duties. The functions of the office of the City Attorney shall be to: A. Advise the Council and all City officers in all matters pertaining to their offices; B. Furnish legal services at all meetings of the Council, except when excused or disabled, and give advice or opinions on the legality of all matters under consideration by the Council or by any of the boards, commissions, committees or officers; C. Prepare and/or approve all ordinances, resolutions, agreements, contracts, and other legal instruments as shall be required for the proper conduct of the business of the City and approve the form of all contracts, agreements, and bonds given to the City; D. Provide the necessary legal services required in connection with the acquisition of land or easements on behalf of the City; E. Subject to the general direction of the Council, prosecute and defend the City, and all boards, officers and employees in their official capacities, all civil proceedings before judicial and quasi- judicial tribunals. The City Attorney shall not compromise, settle or dismiss any action for or against the City without permission of the City Council. Nor shall the City Attorney commence any civil action without the permission of the Council. F. Prosecute all violations of City ordinance; provided, however, that the City Attorney is not required to prosecute any misdemeanor or infraction within the City arising out of a violation of State law. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 141 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 9 2.18.030 Council-Attorney Relations. Individual Councilmembers may seek and obtain legal advice from the City Attorney on any matter or matters pertaining to the legal position of the City. Any such advice given to individual Councilmembers, however, may be repeated to the entire Council at any regular or special Council meeting. With respect to advice to individual Councilmembers regarding potential conflicts of interest, the City Attorney may render informal advice; provided, however, that it is understood that a Councilmember is automatically protected from potential liability for conflict of interest only upon taking action which conforms to a written opinion issued by the California Fair Political Practices Commission. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.040 Attorney-Staff Relations. Periodically, but not less than once per year, the City Attorney and the City Manager will meet and confer in good faith regarding the allocation of the City Attorney’s time among City departments. (Ord. 2033, § 1, 2008; Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.050 Relations Between Attorney and Individual Members of the Public. Consistent with the functions and duties of the City Attorney's office described in Section 2.18.020 of this chapter, the City Attorney or the Assistant City Attorney may, but is not required, to meet or discuss any matter with individual members of the public, legal counsel, or the media. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.060 Bond. The City Attorney shall furnish a corporate surety bond to be determined and approved by the City Council, and shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of the duties imposed upon the City Attorney as prescribed in this chapter. Any premium for such bond shall be a proper charge against the City. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.070 Acting City Attorney. A. The Assistant City Attorney shall serve as City Attorney pro tempore during any temporary absence or disability of the City Attorney. B. In the event there is no Assistant City Attorney, the Council shall appoint a qualified attorney to act as City Attorney pro tempore. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.080 Agreements on Employment. The terms and conditions of employment of the City Attorney shall be established by ordinance or resolution. If the City Attorney is a full time employee, any employment agreement between the City and the City Attorney shall contain a provision for performance evaluations of the City Attorney to be conducted by the City Council at least once per calendar year. If the City Attorney is an independent contractor, the City Council shall endeavor to provide periodic feedback regarding the performance of the independent contractor. (Ord. 2040 § 1, 2009; Ord. 2033 § 2, 2008; Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.090 Assistants and Employees. Notwithstanding the provision of Section 2.52.100 of the Municipal Code, but subject to the other applicable provisions of Chapter 2.52, the City Attorney shall appoint, discipline and remove all assistants, deputies, and employees under his or her authority. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 142 City of Cupertino, CA – RFP for Contract City Attorney Services Page 10 2.18.100 Eligibility. No person elected or appointed as a Council-person of the City shall, subsequent to taking office as Councilperson, be eligible for appointment as City Attorney until one year has elapsed after the Councilmember has ceased to be a member of the City Council. (Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 2.18.110 Suspension–Removal–Resignation. A. The removal of the City Attorney shall be only on a majority vote of the entire City Council. B. The City Attorney may resign from his or her position upon at least four weeks’ written notice to the City Council. (Ord. 2096, 2012; Ord. 1673, § 1 (part), 1994) 143 396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 T: (415) 552 -7272 F: (415) 552 -5816 www.smwlaw.com HEATHER M. MINNER Attorney Minner@s mwlaw.com February 05, 2019 City of Cupertino Mayor Steven Scharf Cupertino City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3202 Re: Legal Retainer Agreement Dear Mayor Scharf: This letter sets forth the terms under which Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP (“Firm”) will provide City Attorney legal services to the City of Cupertino (“City”). If the City agrees to the terms of this retainer agreement (“Agreement”), please sign one copy of this letter and return it to me at your earliest convenience. 1. Legal Services to Be Provided The Firm is retained to serve as City Attorney for the City of Cupertino. The primary City Attorney responsible for representing the City will be Heather M. Minner. Heather will attend and provide advice at City Council meetings. Heather will hold office hours at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino two days per week, for approximately seven hours per day. Office hour times will be determined in consultation with the City Manager and are anticipated to include attendance at executive team meetings. Richard Taylor will attend City Council and executive team meetings if Heather is unavailable. Other members of the Firm may provide services to the City as directed by Heather or Richard. In addition, the Firm will perform all services generally understood within the field of municipal law to fall within the category of “general counsel” work as defined under Government Code sections 41801, 41802, 41803 and 41803.5, and shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: 144 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 2 (a) Representation of and advice to the Council, committees and commissions, and all City officials in legal matters of municipal government. (b) Attendance at all City Council meetings, unless excused by the Mayor or Council (attendance at special meetings or study sessions and closed sessions). (c) Available to attend up to twelve meetings per year of commissions, public forums, and training sessions such as commission trainings on the Brown Act. (d) Consultation with the City Manager, City staff, or authorized representatives to provide legal advice on proposed policies and activities. (e) Implement directed communications by City Manager in response to members of the public and press/media. (f) Preparation or review of all proposed ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and other documents pertaining to City business. (g) Code enforcement, including filing complaints or administrative proceedings for litigation. (h) Available to assist with personnel issues (excluding collective bargaining) in coordination with employment law counsel and with general liability claims and litigation in coordination with JPA legal counsel. (i) Keep the Council and City Manager informed of the status of litigation involving the City. Attorney shall submit a quarterly status report briefly outlining the status of each litigation, including code enforcement litigation. This status report shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth of the following months (April, July, October and January). Attorney shall also advise the City Council and City Manager of significant developments in litigation involving the City as they occur. (j) Provide written legal opinions when requested by the City Manager or a majority of the City Council. (k) Assist with management of outside legal counsel and provide advice on available options for City Council or City Manager consideration. (l) Manage all attorney correspondence, and, in coordination with City staff, Public Records Act responses. 145 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 3 (m) Assist City Council and appropriate staff in continuing to identify feasibility options toward implementing and achieving the goals, policies and objectives of the City Council. (n) Consultation with individual City Council members on questions regarding City legal matters as it relates to them as Council members and City business. (o) Litigation services to include court and administrative proceedings of every type or nature (except those handled by outside counsel) and includes City conferences, file and report reviews, interviews, legal research, site visits and discussions with witnesses and experts prior to formal proceedings. (p) Provide defense litigation for all actions and other proceedings brought against City, its elected officials, appointed officers and agents, except for litigation related to matters on which the City is represented by outside legal counsel, as identified below. In cases of unusual significance or complexity, retention of additional outside counsel can be approved by City Council. (q) Prosecution for violations of the Municipal Code and enforcement litigation. (r) Special projects assigned by City Council. (s) Real estate transactions. The Firm represents that it possesses all necessary training, licenses and permits to perform the Services, and that its performance of the services will conform to the standard of practice of a professional that specializes in performing professional services of a like nature and complexity. The Firm further agrees to perform legal services in a manner that complies with the California Rules of Professional Conduct and state laws relating to conflict of interest and self-dealing, including the California Political Reform Act (Government Code section 81000 et seq.) and Government Code section 1099 et. seq. Violation of the professional conduct and ethics laws is cause for termination of this Agreement and recovery by the City of fees paid for services performed in violation of said rules and laws. The Firm’s services under this agreement do not include matters related to the following specialized services, which the firm expects will primarily be handled by outside legal counsel: 146 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 4  Disciplinary proceedings and other matters related to employment law.  Workers’ compensation claims and litigation.  Labor negotiations and interpretation of M.O.Us with represented employees.  Bond counsel.  Government tort claims filed against the City and general liability litigation covered by the City’s Joint Powers Association (JPA) pool providers. However, the City Attorney may be secondarily involved with these outside legal counsel matters upon request by the City Manager or Council. And the City Attorney will be apprised of these matters as is relevant to her duties as the City Attorney. 2. Legal Fees, Costs, and Billing Practices (a) General Services: General Services are those legal services to be provided by the Firm as described in Section 1 of this Agreement, excluding Special Services and Reimbursable Matters as defined below in Subsections 2(b) and (c) of this Agreement. The Firm will provide General Services for a monthly retainer fee of $50,000 for the first 200 hours billed during the month. If General Services do not reach 200 hours in a given month, the retainer fee will be reduced by $250 for each hour less than 200 worked that month. If General Services exceed 200 hours per month, the following hourly billing rates apply for that additional time: Partner $300 Jr. Partner $275 Associate III $265 Associate II $255 Associate I $220 Planner $185 Paralegal $115 Law Clerk $80 147 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 5 Consulting Attorney/Of Counsel $300 (b) Special Services: Special Services include the following:  Code enforcement administrative proceedings and litigation.  Litigation services, including arbitration, mediation and administrative proceedings before agencies other than the City.  Real estate transactions;  The Firm’s existing special matters for the City, specifically advice related to the Vallco project and Lehigh Quarry, and CEQA advice related to the Cupertino Village Hotel project, the Westport project, Apple Campus 2, and De Anza Hotel.  CEQA and land use advice on major development applications, specific plans, and general plan amendments.  Advice related to ballot measures.  Special projects assigned by the City Council. The Firm’s hourly billing rates for these Special Services will be as follows: Partner $375 Jr. Partner $345 Associate III $330 Associate II $315 Associate I $270 Planner $240 Paralegal $145 Law Clerk $95 Consulting Attorney/Of Counsel $375 148 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 6 (c) Reimbursable Matters: Reimbursable Matters are those matters for which City expenses are reimbursed by private parties; for example, processing development applications on a cost recovery basis, or reimbursement pursuant to an indemnity agreement. The Firm is providing City Attorney legal services described above at significantly less than commercial rates because public funds pay for these City Attorney services. Compensation for Reimbursable Matters, however, are at standard rates, to ensure reasonable parity between the rates charged by applicants’ attorneys and the City Attorney. The Firm’s hourly billing rates for Reimbursable Matters will be as follows: Partner $550 Jr. Partner $510 Associate III $485 Associate II $460 Associate I $395 Planner $350 Paralegal $210 Law Clerk $140 Consulting Attorney/Of Counsel $550 (d) Recovery Matters: In the event the Firm represents the City in matters in which the City becomes eligible, as part of a negotiated settlement or successful conclusion of litigation, to recover attorneys’ fees from adverse parties, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 or other applicable law (“Recovery Matters”), the Firm will be entitled to recover attorneys’ fees at higher rates than the hourly billing rates for General and Special Services listed above and the rates for Reimbursement Matters. Under state law, those fees should be assessed on the basis of commercial rates. For your information, commercial rates for the types of litigation services being provided under this Agreement currently range from $550 to $750 per hour for a partner, and are likely to increase over time. Any amounts for attorneys’ fees or costs incurred by the Firm actually received by us or by City, as a result of agreement or court order in Recovery Matters, shall be divided between the City, which shall be reimbursed for fees actually paid to the Firm for work covered by the recovery, and the Firm, which shall be compensated consistent with prevailing market rates (i.e., the difference between the award and the 149 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 7 amount reimbursed to the City). This fee distribution scheme is not set by law but is negotiable between the firm and City. (e) Bills and Costs: Fees will be charged in increments of one-tenth of an hour. Beginning in January 2021, the Firm will annually increase these billing rates consistent with any annual increase in the Consumer Price Index (October over October time period) for All Urban Consumers (not seasonally adjusted) San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area (1982-1984 = 100) as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, rounded to the nearest whole $1. The Firm will implement the increase each year on January 1st, or as soon thereafter as the CPI information is published. If City declines to pay for the Firm’s services at any increased rates, the Firm will have the right to withdraw as City’s attorneys. The Firm has errors and omissions insurance coverage applicable to the services being provided under this Agreement. City will also reimburse Firm for payments to third parties incurred in the course of representation. City will not reimburse for ordinary costs of business, including but not limited to, overhead costs, staff time, long-distance telephone, facsimile, postage, and routine photocopying. City will reimburse for non-routine photocopying costs (e.g., litigation matters, document review, color copies, and large print jobs) at a cost of 10 cents per page and will reimburse for charges for electronic legal research time. The Firm will not charge travel time for travel to and from the City for office hours, regularly scheduled City Council meetings, or up to twelve other Commission meetings. City agrees to pay for all mileage reimbursement costs ($0.58 per mile as may be adjusted from time to time). City also agrees to pay for one-half the attorney time traveling to and from meetings or site visits for Special Services or meetings other than those listed above. In the event of travel outside of the City on City business, City agrees to pay all transportation costs, lodging, parking, and meals, as well as one-half the hourly rates for attorney travel time. The Firm will provide detailed monthly billing statements for fees and costs incurred. City agrees to pay the Firm’s billed costs and fees within thirty (30) days following billing. Monthly statements shall set forth a description of all work performed, hours worked, identify person undertaking work, and rates charged. 3. Insurance The Firm agrees to maintain insurance in the following amounts: 150 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 8 1. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with coverage limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) including products and operations hazard, contractual insurance, broad form property damage, independent consultants, personal injury, underground hazard, and explosion and collapse hazard where applicable. 2. Automobile Liability Insurance for vehicles used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claimant and One Million dollars ($1,000,000) per incident. 3. Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the laws of the State of California. 4 Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance with coverage limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). The policy or policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in the State of California and with a rating of at least A: VII in the latest edition of Best’s Insurance Guide, or a California approved Surplus Lines carrier (e.g,. Lloyd’s of London). 4. Authorized Representative of City The City Council as a whole shall direct the Firm’s provision of services under this Agreement. The City designates the City Manager as the authorized representative to be the primary person to communicate with the Firm regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. This designation is intended to establish a clear line of authority and to minimize potential uncertainty, but not to preclude communication between the Firm and other representatives of City. Unless directed otherwise by City, all correspondence and bills will be directed to the designated authorized representative. 5. Discharge and Withdrawal City may discharge the Firm at any time, with or without cause, by providing written notice to the Firm, which is effective upon receipt by the Firm. Discharge without cause will normally include a ninety (90) work day notice period to permit transition of matters and responsibilities to new counsel. In the event of discharge, if the Firm is City’s attorney of record in any proceeding, the Firm will promptly provide City with a substitution of attorney form if requested by the City. City will execute and return the substitution of attorney form immediately upon receipt from the Firm. 151 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 9 The Firm may withdraw upon ninety (90) work days’ prior written notice, with or without cause. The Firm may withdraw at any time as permitted under the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California. A valid reason for withdrawal by the Firm would include, but not be limited to, City’s consent, City’s breach of this Agreement, City’s failure to pay fees and costs as provided in this Agreement, City’s conduct renders it unreasonably difficult for the Firm to carry out the representation effectively, or any fact or circumstances that would render the Firm’s continuing representation unlawful or unethical. At such time as the Firm’s services conclude, all unpaid fees for legal and related services and costs and expenses will immediately become due and payable. 6. Case Files After the Firm’s services conclude, the Firm will, upon City’s request, deliver the files for all City matter to City. If City does not request the files, the Firm will retain them for a period of five years after the matter is closed. If City does not request delivery of the files before the end of the five-year period, the Firm will have no further obligation to retain the files and may, at the Firm’s discretion, destroy them without further notice to City. At any point during the five-year period, City may request delivery of the files. If City so requests, paper copies of original documents (or the originals themselves) will be provided free of charge. City agrees to pay for any additional fees or costs incurred to produce copies of electronic files, if City requests those files. 7. No Guarantee Nothing in this Agreement and nothing in the Firm’s statements to City will be construed as a promise or guarantee about the outcome of this matter. The Firm makes no such promises or guarantees. 8. Conflicts The Firm does not have, and shall not acquire, any interest not disclosed to City that creates a legal conflict with its performance of services under this Agreement, unless the City consents in writing to such conflict. 9. Independent Contractor The Firm shall at all times herein be deemed an independent contractor wholly responsible for the manner in which it performs the services under this Agreement and fully liable for the acts and omissions of its employees, subconsultants and agents. 152 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 10 Under no circumstances shall this Agreement be construed as creating an employment, agency, joint venture or partnership relationship between City and the Firm, and no such relationship shall be implied from performance of this Agreement. The terms in this Agreement referring to direction from the City Manager shall be construed as providing for direction as to the scope of services, and not as to the means and methods by which a result is obtained. The Firm shall pay all other taxes including but not limited to any applicable City of Cupertino business tax, not explicitly assumed in writing by City hereunder. The Firm shall comply with all valid administrative regulations respecting the assumption of liability for the payment of payroll taxes and contributions as above described and to provide any necessary information with respect thereto to proper authorities. Notwithstanding the Firm’s independent contractor relationship with City, City may, from time to time (i.e. annually), and at its sole discretion, conduct an evaluation of the Firm’s services as City Attorney, including conducting such evaluation in closed session as permitted under Government Code section 54957. 10. Indemnification and Liability To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Firm shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its officers, agents, departments, officials, representatives and employees (collectively ‘Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, loss, cost, damage, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Firm or its subconsultants), expense and liability of every kind, nature and description (including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, paralegal and attorneys’ fees (including costs attributable to in-house paralegals and attorneys), City staff costs, litigation expenses and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation) that arise from or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from the services under this Agreement, or any part thereof, but only to the proportionate extent caused by any negligent act or omission of the Firm, any subconsultant of the Firm, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control (collectively “Liabilities”). Irrespective of any language to the contrary in this Agreement, the Firm has no duty to provide or to immediately pay for an up-front defense of City against claims or allegations unproved in a final judgment in all courts, but shall reimburse those litigation costs and expenses referenced herein that are incurred by the City to the proportionate extent caused by the negligence of the Firm, any subconsultant of the Firm, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone that they control . The Firm’s indemnification and hold harmless obligation shall not exceed the Firm’s finally determined percentage of liability based upon the comparative fault of the Firm. The 153 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 11 parties agree, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to submit to mediation, any dispute, cause, or controversy arising out of or relating to the validity, enforceability, interpretation, performance, or breach of this section, including, but not limited to, the determination of liability based upon the comparative fault of the Firm (the “Claims”). In the event the parties do not resolve any Claims through mediation, then the Firm and City agree to binding arbitration of such Claims through JAMS, under California Code of Civil Procedure sections 1280 through 1294.4. The parties further agree that this Agreement is intended to be strictly construed to provide for mediation followed by arbitration, if necessary, as the sole and exclusive means for resolution of all disputes under this section (including, but not limited to, the determination of liability based upon the comparative fault of the Firm) to the fullest extent permitted by law. The parties expressly waive any entitlement to have such controversies decided by a court or a jury. Any mediation and/or arbitration of Claims under this section shall occur in Santa Clara County, California. The parties shall be responsible for their own attorneys’ fees and related hearing costs and shall split equally the costs for the mediator and/or arbitrator. The provisions of this section shall survive the completion of the services or termination of this Agreement. * * * If any provision in this Agreement is held in whole or in part to be unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of that provision and of the entire Agreement will be severable and remain in effect. This Agreement may be modified by subsequent written agreement. This Agreement will be effective when it is signed by you. However, this Agreement will apply to any services, including transition, we may provide in connection with the engagement before the effective date. We look forward to working with you as City Attorney for the Ci ty of Cupertino. If this Agreement is satisfactory, please execute it and return a copy to me. Very truly yours, SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP Heather M. Minner 154 City of Cupertino February 05, 2019 Page 12 This Contract was approved by the City Council at its regular meeting of ______ 2019. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: City of Cupertino ________________________ Date: ________________ Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attest:________________________ Date: ________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk 1076204.6 155 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4829 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/7/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 (Continued from January 15) Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Weed Abatement Program Commencement Report C - Notice to Destroy Weeds and Program Schedule D - Approved Resolution No. 18-111 Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 (Continued from January 15) Note objections and adopt Resolution 19-019 ordering abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™156 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Order the abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111. Recommended Action Note objections and adopt the draft resolution ordering abatement of a public nuisance (weeds) pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 724 and Resolution No. 18-111. Discussion Chapter 9.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code requires property owners to remove or destroy weeds on their property for fire protection. The weed abatement process is in place to notify the property owners of this responsibility, authorize the County to remove the weeds if the property owner doesn’t, and allow the County to recover the costs of abatement. The process consists of eight steps that begin in November and go through August of each year. At this time, the process is at Step 4. 1. County prepares a list of all properties that have been non-compliant in removing weeds in the last three years and provides that list to the City (Nov). 2. City Council adopts a resolution declaring weeds a nuisance and setting a hearing date to hear objections by property owners to having their name on the list (Nov-Dec). 3. County sends notice to the property owners on the list notifying them of the hearing date and explaining that they must remove weeds by the abatement deadline of April 30 or it will be done for them, and the cost of the abatement plus administrative costs assessed to their property (Dec). 4. City Council holds the hearing to consider objections by property owners and adopts a resolution ordering abatement (Jan). 157 5. County sends a courtesy letter to property owners on the list notifying them again of the abatement deadline and noting that they will work with the property owner to be sure the weeds are removed (Jan). 6. After April 30, the properties are inspected by the County to verify th at weeds were removed and proceeds with abatement if the inspection fails. County makes a list of all costs associated with the abatement and provides that list to the City (June-July). 7. City notifies the property owners on the assessment list notifying them of the hearing date. (July-Aug). 8. City Council holds a hearing, notes any disputes, and adopts a resolution putting a lien assessment on the properties to allow the County to recover the cost of weed abatement (July-Aug). Fiscal Impact Any fees waived by the Council will be billed to the City by the County to cover their cost of servicing the property. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Approved for Submission by: Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attachments: A - Draft Resolution B - 2019 Weed Abatement Program Commencement Report C - Notice to Destroy Weeds and Program Schedule D - Approved Resolution No. 18-111 158 RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ORDERING ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.08 AND RESOLUTION NO. 18-111 WHEREAS, the City Council has declared that the growth of weeds, the accumulation of garden refuse, cuttings and other combustible trash upon the private properties as described in Resolution No. 18-111 adopted November 20, 2018, to be a public nuisance; and WHEREAS, after due notice, a public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the City Council on February 5, 2019 to allow the impacted property owners to contest the matter; and WHEREAS, from the evidence presented, both oral and written, at the public meeting of February 5, 2019, the City Council finds it’s in the City’s best interests for the City to abate these conditions by authorizing the County’s Agricultural Commissioner to do so on the City’s behalf and in accordance with the law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Agricultural Commissioner is hereby ordered to abate such nuisance or cause the same to be abated by having the weeds that have been declared a nuisance, destroyed or removed by cutting, dicing, chemical spraying or any other method determined by the Commissioner to be appropriate, and that all debris, whether in piles or scattered, be hauled away; 2. That the Agricultural Commissioner and his/her deputies, assistants, employees, contracting agents or other representatives shall have express authorization to enter upon said private properties for the purpose of causing said public nuisance to be abated, in accordance with all applicable legal requirements; 3. That any affected property owner shall have the right to destroy or remove such weeds or debris himself or herself or have the same destroyed or removed at his/her own expense provided that such destruction or removal shall have been completed prior to the arrival of the Agricultural Commissioner or his authorized representative to destroy or remove them by the Parcel Abatement Deadline of April 30, 2019. 159 Resolution No. 19- Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That the Agricultural Commissioner shall keep account of abating said nuisance and embody such account in a report and assessment list to the City Council, which shall be filed with the City Clerk. 2. Said reports of costs, hearing and collection procedures involved shall be provided as stated in Chapter 9.08. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on the 5th day of February 2019, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: _______________________ ________________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor City of Cupertino 160 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAMCOMMENCEMENT REPORTCITY OF CUPERTINOSitus APN CITy/STATE10531 POKTAL AV 316-30-102 TANG, GEORGE AND TSAO, JLTNG 1053I PORTALA\TN CUPERTINO CA 95014-244719641 DRAKE DR 316-32-028 YOT]NG, KATHY AND EDBERG, 1964I DRAKE DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-2433O 326.07-035 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO 1 I I ALMADEN BLVD SAN JOSE CA 95 I I5-OOO510337 GLENCOE DR 326-30-083 ANDREWS, JOYCE H TRUSTEE 20643 CHERYL DR CUPERIINO CA 95014-290910467 GLENCOE DR 326-30-106 DAMASKROBERTT POBOX24}I CUPERTINO CA 9501510712 PEBBLE PL 326-43-044 WINGEI CHARLES MAND 10712 PEBBLE pL CUPERTINO CA 95014-1333O STEVENS BL 342-13-A12 DEANEANDDEANEINC 4O4OMOORPARKUNIT#II6 SANJOSE CA 95II7-I85I10744 SANTALUCIA RD 342-16-073 BANGALORE, MANJLINATH SAND 10744 SANTALUCIARD CUPERTINO CA 95014-394022661 SANruAN RD 342-17-11A CODDING,NATHANIELJAND 2266I SANruANRD CUPERTINO CA 950I4-OOOOO ELCERRITO RD 342-21-004 ITEM,WERNER ANDGLORIAE 22670SANruANRD CUPERIINO CA 95014-393322765 SAN ruAN RD 342-22-031 NEHAWANDIAN, NASIM 22765 SAN ruAN RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-393423026 VOSS AV 342-50-016 TSAI,VICKYTSAY-HSAI TRUSTEE& 23O26VOSSAV CUPERTINO CA 95014-2663O (LAND ONLÐ 342.50-019 CHAMBERLAIN, JACK T TRUSTEE 655 SKYV/AY SAN CARLOS CA 94070O MC CLELLAN RD 356-05-005 LOWENTHAL, zuCHARD AND ELLEN 2I6O2VILLAMARIACT CUPERTINO CA 9501410750 RAE LN 356-07-076 CHANG,CHzuS ETAL sSOALBERTAAV SUNNYVALE CA 94087-OOOO10750 RAE LN 356-07-077 CHANG, CHzuS ETAL 5SOALBERTAAV SUNNYVALE CA 94087-OOOO21885 HYANNISPORT DR 356-13-050 BERGMAN, JACQUELINE 21885 HYANNISPORT DR CUPERTINO CA 95014401521576 LAPLAYA CT 356.23.015 SAHA,ANGSHUMAN AND OPOBOX29IS CUPERTINO CA 95015-291821862 LINDY LN 356-24-018 CHEN, JENNIFER AND SMITH, MARK 21862 LINDYLN CUPERTINO CA 95014-481321987 LINDY LN 356-25-031 KANG, PING QI AND LIANG, YU ruAN 2408 CLEMENT ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 9412121989 LINDY LN 356.25-032 SLIN, XI HUA AND ZHU, SHAN IISOI DOROTHYANNE WY CUPERTINO CA 95014-5258I 1395 CANYON VIEW CL 356.27.022 HOPKINS, JOHN N AND CAROLYN S I 1395 CANYON VIEW CL CUPERTINO CA 950I4-OOOO11450 CANYON VIEW CL 356.27.423 CHANG, CHIAO-FU AND SUE-FAY 20832 HANFORD DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-182423 records of 78Santa Clara County Weed Abatement ProgramPage I161 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAMCOMMENCEMENT REPORT- CITY OF CUPERTINO22032223101004020940205922061620840002065211835l l84l02204510375104418791916018930LNAVWYBLRDRDDRDRDRAVWYWYLNRDAVAVAVBLAVCACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA0LINDYPALMBIANCHISTEVENSMC CLELLANMC CLELLANCHERRYLANDCRANBERRYCRANBERRYCLEONO SITUSUPLANDUPLANDSTAUFFERREGNARTLINDSAYOAKVILLEBETTESTEVENSTILSON356-27-025357-04-023359-07-021359-07-022359-1 8-01 0359-1 8-048359-24-442362-02-048362-04-058362-09-026362-16-037362-1 9-033362-31-OO2362-31-030366-03-056366-03-062366-09-05336646-004369-12-412369-12-035369-27-050375-47-AA1375-09-049CITY/STATECUPERTINOSAN JOSECUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOROSEVILLEROSEVILLEROSEVILLEROSEVILLEROSEVILLECUPERTINOPALOALTOCUPERTINOSARATOGAROSEVILLECUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOMILPITASSAN JOSECUPERTINO95014-481I9s12s-320095014-16439s014-217095014-29559s0t4-29ss9s014-1802957479574795747957479574795014-503394304-132395014-51069s01044319s7479s014497995014-16649s0144s209503s95 126-000095014-3655DE, KALPAJIT AND MAJUMDE&VAN BLOMMESTEIN, ROBERT ANDLIN, JASON CAND FANG, YING HOLIN, JASON CCHANG, LANCE CAND MELODYFHARDEMAN, MELODY F ETALCHERRYLAND LLCUNION PACIFIC CORPORATIONUNION PACIFIC CORPORATIONUNION PACIFIC CORPORATIONI]NION PACIFIC CORPORATIONUNION PACIFIC CORPORATIONBURROW, BRADLEY J AND ruANITA SALMASI, AZITA TRUSTEE & ETALVENKATESH, BHIMACHARVEMPATX HYMA T ANDLTNION PACIFIC CORPORATIONBIGLE& ROBERT AAND PUNITA PTLING, CTIARLES CVRCELJ, MICHAEL JCT{ANG, ruI POSTEVENS CREEK L PLIU, ZHENG AND CHEN,AIDONG22032 LINDY LNII44 BRACEAV10228 STELLING RDN20940 STEVENS CREEK BL2O592MC CLELLAN RD2O6I6MCCLELLAN RD20846 DLINBAR DRIOO3I FOOTHILLS BLVDIOO3I FOOTHILLS BLVDIOO3I FOOTHILLS BLVDIOO3I FOOTHILLS BLVDIOO3I FOOTHILLS BLVD20652CLEO AV965 LAUREL GLEN DRI1835 UPLAND WY13304 GLEN BRAE DRIOO3I FOOTHILLS BLVDII23O BUBB RDIO3T2ANNARBORAVIO44I OAKVILLEAVII98 EAGLE RIDGE WAYI4OO PARKMOORAV STE I9O18930 TILSON AV46 records of 78Santa Clara County Weed Abatement ProgramPage2162 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAMCOMMENCEMENT REPORTCITY OF CUPERTINOSitus102001884118880188441027110331103911040810272t877010240187341036110391186551042418671104561061010590105401074010730APNAV 375-12-AA2wY 375-12-033wY 375-13-005wY 375-13-008LN 375-15-028LN 375-15-039LN 375-15-048LN 375-16-004LN 375-17-017AV 375-17-039DR 375-18-022AV 375-18-025AV 375-18-039AV 375-18-A42AV 375-19-008BL 375-24-003cr 375-25-039AV 375-26-045DR 375-27-019DR 375-27-026DR 375-27-037DR 375-29-016AV 375-31-008CITY/STATESTERNARATAARATAARATAMENHARTMENHARTMENHARTMENHARTMENHARTTILSONCALVERTLOREEJOHNSONJOHNSONLOREESTERLINGPRINGJOHNSONWLINDERLICHWUNDERLICHWLINDERLICHGASCOIGNEJOHNSON0PoBox2422I884I AR/JTA WYISSSOARATAWYI8844ARATAWY20730 FARGO DR5878 MACADAM CT48236ARCADIANT STIO4O8 MENT{ART LN10272 MENHART LNIO55 MCKINEYAVWIO24O CALVERT DRI8734 LOREEAVaPoB.ox242245449LTTTLE FOOT PL18655 LOREEAV842 SAN PETRONIOAV1867I PRING CT10456 JOHNSONAVIO6IO WLTNDERLICH DR27769EDGERTON RD10540 WLTNDERLICH DRIO74O GASCOIGNE DRIO73O JOHNSONAVPALOALIOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOSAN JOSEFREMONTCUPERTINOCUPERTINOSLTNNYVALECUPERTINOCUPERTINOPALOALTOFREMONTCUPERTINOSUNNYVALECUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOLOSALTOS HILLSCUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOMC GRATH, PATRICK WTHOMPSON,ZORA TRUSTEEYI, QINGHONG AND ZHOU,TTEDSOUZA, SANTHOSH A AND SABITHANULLHORIO, LELAND S ETALHU, YUGEN AND YINGHEBARDSLEY, BRENT GBULLOCK, JOSEPH RAND STELLAEHOVEYDA, NILOUFAR AND JALILI,WANG, NADIAJAND XING, PEIGUO, XIANZHENG AND YAN, DONGMC GRATH, PATRICK WLU, YING-WULIANG, WAN HARCINDY TRUSTEEAITIA, MAGED AAND BEDAI&HUANG, CHANG-KAI AND TSENG,CHOI,IHNAEE AND CHO, SLINGruNIE, XIAOQIONGCHOONG, PHILIP TAND HSIA SZHANG, YUAN AND CHEN, FENNAFAULKNE& BARBARA JEANNE ETALLEE, YU-MING AND MING-TZUNGCACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACACA94309-242295014-367095014-36349s0r4-3634950t4-190495123-433294s39950 l4-363 I95014-36309408695014-380895014-383994309-242294s399s014-38379408s-344995014-382295014-38149s014-36s294022-323595014-3650950t4-384695014-381869 records of 78Santa Clara County Weed Abatement ProgramPage 3163 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAMCOMMENCEMENT REPORTCITY OF CUPERTINO108011063010616l 887010657l 89301073210627t9200GASCOIGNECARVERCARVERTUGGLEMORENGOTUGGLEMORENGOCULBERTSONTILSONDR 375-31-027DR 375-32-020DR 375-32-021AV 375-32-424DR 375-34-013AV 375-34-045DR 375-35-059DR 375-36-027AV 37540-0614231 NORWALK DREEIOI0PoBox242210616 CARVERDRI8870 TUGGLEAV10657 MORENGO DR16230 AZALEAWY10732 MORENGO DR1184 VALELAKE CTI92OO TILSONAVCITY/STÄTESAN JOSEPALOALTOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOCUPERTINOLOS GATOSCUPERTINOSLINNYVALECUPERTINOAGARWAL, SANJAY TRUSTEE & ETMC GRATH, PAIRICK WYETTAW JERzu LAND JACKIEADELA CRUZ, SHERWIN PETER LORTIZ, ROSAF ETALSHEN & TIAN LLCZHANG, JIANYONG AND XIAO, YANMC GRATH, PATRICK WLEE, JOHN C AND NGUYEN, NGOCCACACACACACACACACA9st2994309-242295014-360795014-362695014-35 l395032-3622950r4-351594089-20329s014-3s2978 records of 78Santa Clara County Weed Abatement ProgramPage 4164 (over) TRA 13 Notice to Destroy Weeds NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on November 20, 2018 pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the City Council passed a resolution declaring that all weeds growing upon any private property or in any public street or alley, as defined in Section 9.08.010 of the Cupertino Municipal Code constitute a public nuisance, which nuisance must be abated by the destruction or removal thereof. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that property owners shall without delay, remove all such weeds from their property and the abutting half of the street in front and alleys, if an y, behind such property and between the lot lines thereof as extended, or such weeds will be destroyed or removed and such nuisance abated by the County Agricultural Commissioner, in which case the cost of such destruction or removal will, including but not limited to administration costs, be assessed upon the lots and lands from which, or from the front or rear of which, such weeds shall have been destroyed or removed and such cost will constitute a lien upon such lots or lands until paid and will be colle cted upon the next tax roll upon which general municipal taxes are collected. All property owners having any objections to the proposed destruction or removal of such weeds are hereby notified to attend a meeting of said City to be held in the Council Chambers of City Hall, located at 10300 Torre Ave., Cupertino, California, on Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 6:45 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, when their objections will be heard and given due consideration. The language and format for this notice is required by California Health and Safety Code Sections 14891 Et. Seq. 165 (over) CITY OF CUPERTINO WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE February 5, 2019 Public hearing to consider objections to Abatement List. April 30, 2019 PARCEL ABATEMENT DEADLINE Parcel must be free from hazardous vegetation by this date or Inspector will order abatement. July/August 2019 Assessment Hearing date to be scheduled by City Council. 2019 COUNTY WEED ABATEMENT FEES Properties in the Weed Abatement Program, you will be responsible for an annual inspection fee of $80.00 per parcel. Please be advised that the property owner of any parcel found to be non-compliant on or after the March 1st deadline will be charged a processing fee of $495.00 and the property will be scheduled for abatement by the County contractor. If you complete the abatement work before the County contractor performs the abatement, you will not incur further charges. Should the abatement work be performed by a County contractor, you will be assessed the contractor’s charges plus a County administrative fee of $806.00 per parcel. 2018 COUNTY CONTRACTOR’S WEED ABATEMENT PRICE LIST A) Disc Work** PARCEL SIZE: 1st Disc + 2nd Disc = Total Discs 0-12,500 sq.ft. $202.86 $136.00 $338.86 12,501sq.ft.- 43,560sq.ft. $235.72 $170.00 $405.72 Larger than 1 Acre $100.87 $89.53 $190.40 (PER ACRE) ** It is required that parcels be disced twice a year. The cost for the first discing is higher due to additional work normally required during the first discing. B) HANDWORK $3.38 PER 100 sqft C) FLAIL 6 Foot Mower $4.50 PER 1000 sqft MOWING 12 Foot Mower $3.50 PER 1000 sqft D) LOADER WORK $110.50 PER HOUR E) DUMP TRUCK $102.00 PER HOUR F) BRUSH WORK $3.38 PER 100 sqft G) Debris removal $38.86 PER 1000sqft G) DUMP FEE 100% Added to orders with debris removal at 100% of the dump site charge. *Please note this program does not offer herbicide application as a method of abatement. 166 RESOLUTION NO. 18-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL DECLARING WEEDS ON CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND SETTING A HEARING FOR OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED REMOVAL WHEREAS, weeds as described in Chapter 9.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code are growing in the City of Cupertino upon certain streets, sidewalks, highways, roads and private property; and WHEREAS, said weeds are undesirable, noxious, and dangerous and due to their rapid growth are or may become a fire menace; as such, said weeds constitute a public nuisance under state law and Chapter 9.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, property owners and other persons occupying or having charge or control of any building, lot, or premises within the City are required to remove weeds in accordance wi.th the provisions of Chapter 9 .08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: 1. Weeds growing upon any private property or in any street or alley within the City in violation of Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.08 constitute a public nuisance; 2. The weeds found on the streets, sidewalks, highways, roads and private property, which are identified by common names or by reference to the tract, block, lot, code area, and parcel number on the report prepared by the County Agricultural Commissioner and attached hereto, are declared to be a public nuisance; 3. That the 15th day of January, 2019, at the hour of 6:45 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the Council Chamber in the Community Hall, City of Cupertino, is hereby set as the time and place where all property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of such weeds may be heard; 167 Resolution No. 18-111 Page 2 4. That the Agricultural Commissioner is hereby designated and ordered to give notice of the adoption of this resolution, in the manner and form provided in Chapter 9.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20th day of November, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Members of the 6.ty Council Paul, Sinks, Chang, Scharf, Vaidhyanathan None None None APPROVED: ~/})J- Grace Schmidt, City Clerk 168 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM COMMENCEMENT REPORT CITY OF CUPERTINO Situs APN CITY/STATE 10531 PORTAL AV 316-30-102 TANG , GEORGE AND TSAO, JUNG 10531 PORTALAVN CUPERTINO CA 95014-2447 19641 DRAKE DR 316-32-028 YOUNG , KATHY AND EDBERG, 19641 DRAKE DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-2433 0 326-07-035 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO Ill ALMADEN BLVD SAN JOSE CA 95115-0005 10337 GLENCOE DR 326-30-083 ANDREWS, JOYCE H TRUSTEE 20643 CHERYL DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-2909 10467 GLENCOE DR 326-30-106 DAMASK ROBERT T P0BOX242I CUPERTINO CA 95015 10712 PEBBLE PL 326-43-044 WINGET, CHARLES MAND 10712 PEBBLE PL CUPERTINO CA 95014-1333 0 STEVENS BL 342-13-012 DEANE AND DEANE INC 4040 MOORPARK UNIT #116 SAN JOSE CA 95117-1851 10744 SANTALUCIA RD 342-16-073 BANGALORE, MANJUNATH SAND 10744 SANTALUCIA RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-3940 22661 SAN JUAN RD 342-17-110 CODDING, NATHANIEL J AND 22661 SAN JUAN RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-0000 0 EL CERRITO RD 342-21-004 ITEM, WERNER AND GLORIA E 22670 SAN JUAN RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-3933 22765 SAN JUAN RD 342-22-031 NEHAWANDIAN, NASIM 22765 SAN JUAN RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-3934 23026 VOSS AV 342-50-016 TSAI, VICKY TSAY-HSAI TRUSTEE & 23026 VOSS AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-2663 0 (LAND ONLY) 342-50-019 CHAMBERLAIN, JACK T TRUSTEE 655 SKYWAY SAN CARLOS CA 94070 0 MCCLELLAN RD 356-05-005 LOWENTHAL, RICHARD AND ELLEN 2 I 602 VILLA MARIA CT CUPERTINO CA 95014 10750 RAE LN 356-07 -076 CHANG, CHRIS ET AL 580 ALBERTA AV SUNNYVALE CA 94087-0000 10750 RAE LN 356-07 -077 CHANG, CHRIS ET AL 580 ALBERTA AV SUNNYVALE CA 94087-0000 21885 HYANNISPORT DR 356-13-050 BERGMAN, JACQUELINE 21885 HYANNISPORT DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-4015 21576 LAPLAYA CT 356-23-015 SAHA, ANGSHUMAN AND 0 PO B0X29l8 CUPERTINO CA 95015-2918 21862 LINDY LN 356-24-018 CHEN, JENNIFER AND SMITH, MARK 2 I 862 LINDY LN CUPERTINO CA 95014-4813 21987 LINDY LN 356-25-031 KANG, PING QI AND LIANG, YU JUAN 2408 CLEMENT ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94121 21989 LINDY LN 356-25-032 SUN, XI HUA AND ZHU, SHAN 11801 DOROTHY ANNE WY CUPERTINO CA 95014-5258 11395 CANYON VIEW CL 356-27-022 HOPKINS, JOHN N AND CAROLYN S 11395 CANYON VIEW CL CUPERTINO CA 95014-0000 11450 CANYON VIEW CL 356-27-023 CHANG, CHIAO-FU AND SUE-FAY 20832 HANFORD DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-1824 23 records of 78 Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program Page 1 169 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM COMMENCEMENT REPORT CITY OF CUPERTINO Situs APN CITY/STATE 22032 LINDY LN 356-27-025 DE, KALPAJIT AND MAJUMDER, 22032 LINDY LN CUPERTINO CA 95014-4811 22310 PALM AV 357-04-023 VAN BLOMMESTEIN, ROBERT AND 1144 BRACE AV SAN JOSE CA 95125-3200 10040 BIANCHI WY 359-07-021 LIN, JASON C AND FANG, YING HO 10228 STELLING RON CUPERTINO CA 95014-1643 20940 STEVENS BL 359-07-022 LIN,JASONC 20940 STEVENS CREEK BL CUPERTINO CA 95014-2170 20592 MCCLELLAN RD 359-18-010 CHANG, LANCE C AND MELODY F 20592 MC CLELLAN RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-2955 20616 MCCLELLAN RD 359-18-048 · HARDEMAN,MELODYFETAL 20616 MCCLELLAN RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-2955 20840 CHERRYLAND DR 359-20-042 CHERRYLAND LLC 20846 DUNBAR DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-1802 0 CRANBERRY DR 362-02-048 UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95747 0 CRANBERRY DR 362-04-058 UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95747 362-09-026 UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95747 0 362-16-037 UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95747 362-19-033 UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95747 20652 CLEO AV 362-31-002 BURROW, BRADLEY J AND JUANITA S 20652 CLEO AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-5033 NO SITUS 362-31-030 ALMASI, AZITA TRUSTEE & ET AL 965 LAUREL GLEN DR PALOALTO CA 94304-1323 11835 UPLAND WY 366-03-056 VENKATESH, BHIMACHAR 11835 UPLAND WY CUPERTINO CA 95014-5106 11841 UPLAND WY 366-03-062 VEMPATY, HYMA T AND 13304 GLEN BRAE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-4431 · 0 STAUFFER LN 366-09-053 UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95747 22045 REGNART RD 366-46-004 BIGLER, ROBERT AAND PUNITA P 11230 BUBB RD CUPERTINO CA 95014-4979 10375 LINDSAY AV 369-12-012 TUNG, CHARLES C 10372 ANN ARBOR AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-1664 10441 OAKVILLE AV 369-12-035 VRCELJ, MICHAEL J 10441 OAKVILLEAV CUPERTINO CA 95014-4520 879 BETTE AV 369-27-050 CHANG, JUI PO 1198 EAGLE RIDGE WAY MILPITAS CA 95035 19160 STEVENS BL 375-07-001 STEVENS CREEK LP 1400 PARKMOORAV STE 190 SAN JOSE CA 95126-0000 18930 TILSON AV 375-09-049 LIU, ZHENG AND CHEN, AIDONG 18930 TILSON AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3655 46 records of 78 Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program Page 2 170 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM COMMENCEMENT REPORT CITY OF CUPERTINO Situs APN CITY/STATE 10200 STERN AV 375-12-002 MCGRATH, PATRJCK W OPOBOX2422 PALO ALTO CA 94309-2422 18841 ARATA WY 375-12-033 THOMPSON, ZORA TRUSTEE 18841 ARATA WY CUPERTINO CA 95014-3670 18880 ARATA WY 375-13-005 YI, QINGHONG AND ZHOU, JIE 18880 ARATA WY CUPERTINO CA 95014-3634 18844 ARATA WY 375-13-008 DSOUZA, SANTHOSH A AND SABITHA 18844ARATA WY CUPERTINO CA 95014-3634 10271 MENHART LN 375-15-028 NULL 20730 FARGO DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-1904 10337 MENHART LN 375-15-039 HORIO, LELAND S ET AL 5878 MACADAM CT SAN JOSE CA 95123-4332 10391 MENHART LN 375-15-048 HU, YUGEN AND YINGHE 48236 ARCADIANT ST FREMONT CA 94539 10408 MENHART LN 375-16-004 BARDSLEY, BRENT G I 0408 MENHART LN CUPERTINO CA 95014-3631 10272 MENHART LN 375-17-017 BULLOCK, JOSEPH RAND STELLA E 10272 MENHART LN CUPERTINO CA 95014-3630 18770 TILSON AV 375-17-039 HOVEYDA, NILOUFAR AND JALILI, 1055 MCKINEY AVW SUNNYVALE CA 94086 10240 CALVERT DR 375-18-022 WANG , NADIA J AND XING, PEI I 0240 CALVERT DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3808 18734 LOREE AV 375-18-025 GUO, XIANZHENG AND YAN , DONG 18734 LOREE AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3839 10361 JOHNSON AV 375-18-039 MC GRATH, PATRJCK W 0 POBOX2422 PALOALTO CA 94309-2422 10391 JOHNSON AV 375-18-042 LU, YING-WU 45449 LITTLE FOOT PL FREMONT CA 94539 18655 LOREE AV 375-19-008 LIANG, WAN HAR CINDY TRUSTEE 18655 LOREE AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3837 10424 STERLING BL 375-24-003 ATTIA, MAGEDAAND BEDAIR, 842 SAN PETRONIO AV SUNNYVALE CA 94085-3449 18671 PRING CT 375-25-039 HUANG, CHANG-KAI AND TSENG, 18671 PRING CT CUPERTINO CA 95014-3822 10456 JOHNSON AV 375-26-045 CHOI, IHNAEE AND CHO, SUNGJU 10456 JOHNSON AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3814 10610 WUNDERLICH DR 375-27-019 NIE , XIAOQIONG 10610 WUNDERLICH DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3652 10590 WUNDERLICH DR 375-27-026 CHOONG, PHILIP T AND HSIA S 27769 EDGERTON RD LOS ALTOS HILLS CA 94022-3235 10540 WUNDERLICH DR 375-27-037 ZHANG, YUAN AND CHEN, FENNA I 0540 WUNDERLICH DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3650 10740 GASCOIGNE DR 375-29-016 FAULKNER, BARBARA JEANNE ET AL 10740 GASCOIGNE DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3846 10730 JOHNSON AV 375-31 -008 LEE, YU-MING AND MING-TZUNG 10730 JOHNSON AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3818 69 records of 78 Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program Page 3 171 2019 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM COMMENCEMENT REPORT CITY OF CUPERTINO Situs APN CITY/STATE 10801 GASCOIGNE DR 375-31-027 AGARWAL, SANJAY TRUSTEE & ET 4231 NORWALKDREEI01 SAN JOSE CA 95129 10630 CARVER DR 375-32-020 MC GRATH, PATRICK W OPOBOX2422 PALO ALTO CA 94309-2422 10616 CARVER DR 375-32-021 YETTAW, JERRI LAND JACKIE A 10616 CARVER DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3607 18870 TUGGLE AV 375-32-024 DELA CRUZ, SHERWIN PETER L 18870 TUGGLE AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3626 10657 MORENGO DR 375-34-013 ORTIZ, ROSA F ET AL 10657 MORENGO DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3513 18930 TUGGLE AV 375-34-045 SHEN & TIAN LLC 16230 AZALEA WY LOS GATOS CA 95032-3622 10732 MORENGO DR 375-35-059 ZHANG , JIANYONG AND XIAO, YAN 10732 MOREN GO DR CUPERTINO CA 95014-3515 10627 CULBERTSON DR 375-36-027 MC GRATH, PATRICK W 1184 VALELAKE CT SUNNYVALE CA 94089-2032 19200 TILSON AV 375-40-061 LEE, JOHN C AND NGUYEN, NGOC 19200 TILSON AV CUPERTINO CA 95014-3529 78 records of 78 Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program Page4 172 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4751 Name: Status:Type:Study Session Agenda Ready File created:In control:12/13/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Input on Draft Master Plan, Bicycle Pedestrian Commission, 01.16.pdf B - Input on Draft Master Plan, Teen Forum, 01.22.19 C - Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Workshop, 01.23.19 D - Input on Draft Master Plan, Parks & Rec Comm. Draft Meeting Minutes, 01.24.pdf E - Input on Draft Master Plan, Additional Public Comments, through 01.28.19.pdf F - Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Comments Received, 01.29.19 to 02.03.19 Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Accept presentation on the Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan ("Master Plan") and provide direction regarding desired revisions. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™173 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Recommended Action Accept presentation on the Draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan (“Master Plan”) and provide direction regarding desired revisions. Discussion A process to develop Cupertino’s first citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan (“Master Plan”) has been underway. A draft Master Plan has been prepared and shared for public input. On January 16, 2019, the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission provided feedback (see Attachment A). On January 22, a Youth and Teen forum on the Master Plan was held, co-sponsored by the Teen Commission and Youth Activity Board. More than 50 youth and teens attended the forum, and they submitted 54 comment cards (see Attachment B). The majority of attendees were high school age, but middle school-age students were present as well. On January 23, the draft Master Plan was presented at a public workshop. Although attendance was light, the attendees were engaged in the ensuing discussion and provided verbal feedback as well as one comment card (see Attachment C). On January 24, 2019, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the draft Master Plan at a special meeting. Feedback received at that meeting is contained in the draft meeting minutes provided as Attachment D. Public input has also been arriving via electronic ‘comment cards.’ Comment card input submitted through January 28 is provided as Attachment E. Public input arriving subsequent to the preparation of this staff report will be provided on February 4 as Attachment F. A variety of documents that have been prepared in association developing the draft Master Plan are posted on the City’s website on the project page, at the link below, as well as in the on-line records associated with the Commission and City Council meetings. http://forms4.cupertino.org/parks&recmasterplan/projectUpdates.html 174 A presentation will be provided to the City Council. The City Council’s input and feedback on the draft Master Plan is invited. Sustainability Impact The project will support the City’s sustainability and environmental policies and objectives. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager Reviewed by: Jeff Milkes, Director of Recreation & Community Services Approved for Submission by: Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attachments: A – Input on Draft Master Plan, Bicycle Pedestrian Commission, Jan. 16, 2019 B – Input on Draft Master Plan, Teen Forum, Jan. 22, 2019 C – Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Workshop, Jan. 23, 2019 D – Input on Draft Master Plan, Parks & Recreation Commission, Draft Meeting Minutes, Jan. 24, 2019 E – Input on Draft Master Plan, Additional Public Comments, through Jan. 28, 2019 F - Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Comments Received, Jan. 29 – Feb. 3, 2019 - pending, to be provided Feb. 4, 2019 175 ATTACHMENT A BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION INPUT ON DRAFT PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN JAN. 16, 2019 Below is an informal account of Bicycle Pedestrian Commission input received on the draft Parks & Recreation System Master Plan on January 16, 2019. It is provided as background information, as official meeting minutes are not yet available. Comment #1: Community Gardens are a top priority; the need for them should be more prominent in the Master Plan. Comment #2: The Cupertino Loop Trail should be explicitly mentioned as a priority for implementation; this Master Plan should propose facilitating the Loop Trail. Comment #3: On Table E-1, under the Civic Center – add language regarding providing trailhead amenities & connections to nearby bikeways and off-street trails (i.e. the Loop Trail/Regnart Creek Trail), similar to the language used for Wilson Park. Other input: Safety is important. 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 ATTACHMENT C PUBLIC WORKSHOP INPUT DRAFT PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN JAN. 23, 2019 Below is a summary of public input received on the draft Parks & Recreation System Master Plan at a workshop held at the Cupertino Senior Center on the evening of January 23, 2019. It is provided as a summary of key points made by speakers. One written comment card was submitted by an attendee, and is attached. Among the comments were: • Park land acquisition is a top priority • Park equity, adding parks on the east side, walkable parks – are a top priority • Trails & walkability are important • Why spend $$ on a performing arts center? • Unsure about the need for swimming pools; consider partnering if needed • It’s important for kids to learn to swim • To provide more basketball, consider partnering with schools • If a major facility is pursued, important to identify the O&M costs • What further potential is there for school joint use agreements? Other general input and questions included: • Rancho San Antonio needs more parking • Do community outreach for Lawrence Mitty • Consider a parcourse on Saratoga Creek Trail • What is the status of the Lawrence-Mitty acquisition? The San Fernando/Byrne parcel? • Plan for flexibility, changing trends 239 240 CITY OF CUPERTINO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Community Hall 10350 Torre Ave, Cupertino, CA Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:00 PM SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Tambe called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Hall, at 10350 Torre Ave, Cupertino, CA. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners present: Meenakshi Biyani, Neesha Tambe, Carol Stanek, Judy Wilson (arrived at 7:05pm), Helene Davis (arrived at 7:34pm) Commissioners absent: None Staff present: Jeff Milkes, Kevin Khuu, Gail Seeds Guest speakers: Cindy Mendoza APPROVAL OF MINUTES None CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS None POSTPONEMENTS None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None OLD BUSINESS 1. Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan – Draft Master Plan Jeff Milkes, Director of Recreation and Community Services, introduced Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager, and Cindy Mendoza, Director of Parks and Recreation from MIG, to present to the Commission the draft Citywide Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, reviewing the history of the project, a general overview of the plan, outreach efforts, feedback received so far, and asked for 241 feedback and comments from the Commission and the public on the draft master plan. The Commission received two documents, which included online comments and written comments taken at the public workshop on January 23, which were given to the Commission and will be uploaded as public records. Cathy Wang, Cupertino Resident, commented on the release time and outreach efforts for the draft plan, the decision making process, and the budget allocation for the performing arts center. Qin Pan, Cupertino Resident, inquired on the outreach efforts for the draft plan, commented on the cost estimates of the large projects, and questioned survey data taken and the foundation of the plan. Kitty Moore, Cupertino Resident, inquired about the all-inclusive playground and commented on the teen comments received, park availability measurements, not counting roofs as parks, gym space on the east side, no lights on the trails and maintain the ice rink and bowling alley. Rhoda Fry, Cupertino Resident, supports the conservation and partnerships goals, commented on water features at local parks and Blackberry Farm Golf Course and watering at the golf course, Blackberry Farm pool and parking area, and opening an entrance to Rancho San Antonio off Stevens Creek Boulevard/Permanente Road. Submitted written comments that will be uploaded as public records. Emily Shek, Cupertino Resident, suggested having more free and low cost programs, activities, and exercise available to community, Teen activities, and bringing people together and learning at low cost. Alicia Shober, Cupertino Resident, supported providing an all-inclusive playground. Commissioner Stanek commented on better clarifying the purpose of the Master Plan and the estimated cost values listed within, noting that it is an informational document and is not a budget, blueprint or recommendation. Suggested greater emphasis on programming in the parks to enhance community building. Commissioner Wilson summarized the goal of the Master Plan and suggested emphasizing the funding sources info gathered to City Council. Suggested more emphasis on recreation opportunities at the large parks, and creative solutions for 242 providing park and recreation spaces due to the lack of park space in areas such as the east side. Chair Tambe addressed the questions and concerns asked during the public comments: - clarifying that the master plan is not a blueprint or decision on future projects, but an informative study and review of suggestions from the general public - outreach efforts and strategies done in the past several years and that the plan includes data from various surveys results and information gathered - the cost of facilities - water features - watering at the Blackberry Farm Golf Course - all-inclusive playground study and current status of the project Vice Chair Biyani suggested highlighting that feedback will be accepted until late February and supported the outreach to youth and teens. Commented on the ease to read the document and suggested highlighting that the goals listed are not set in any particular priority. Suggested more emphasis on the expansion of the neighborhood events and partnerships with the schools. Commissioner Davis reiterated the goal of the master plan. Supports the connectivity theme in the plan, including the emphasis on greater walking and biking, having more natural features at parks and making them less static, better programming and customer service, financial stability and safety, public -private partnerships, historical preservation, and aquatics. Chair Tambe suggested having emphasis on “grey” spaces, adequate parking, a citywide shuttle service, no international sized cricket field, connectivity and incorporating the Cupertino Loop trail into the plan, having more consistent trail head amenities, multiuse facilities, greater diversity, relooking at the golf course, and highlighting the benefits of greater investment in parks. The Commission suggested stronger emphasis on adult exercise features in the parks such as par courses and adult outdoor exercise equipment, the all-inclusive playground, Lawrence-Mitty acquisition, a healing garden, parklets or other small-space solutions, and off leash dog areas. Also suggested emphasizing the role of the prioritization tools for evaluating potential projects. 2. Potential Priority Areas for the 2019 Recreation and Community Services Work Plan, Part of the City Council Approved City Work Plan 243 Jeff Milkes reviewed the item from the previous meeting, updated information learned since then, and asked for feedback from the Commissioners on potential priorities or to postpone to next month. Kitty Moore, Cupertino Resident, recommended waiting for more input and direction from the current City Council and commented on the Sunday field use, prioritization of groups, related fees, and permitting of the fields. Chair Tambe suggested adding a citywide grey water system, finding ways to engage with new community members, public private partnerships, such as with Deep Cliff Golf Course and De Anza College’s V-Pak, and citywide shuttle service. The Commission will discuss this item again in the February meeting. NEW BUSINESS None STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS Vice Chair Biyani and Chair Tambe attended the Cupertino Spelling Bee and suggested expanding the event next year. Vice Chair Biyani also attended the Youth & Teen Forum. Commissioner Stanek attended the Master Plan Workshop at the Cupertino Senior Center. Chair Tambe suggested collaborating with Whole Foods or Target to host events in their parking lot or a local 5k My Cupertino run. ADJOURNMENT – Chair Tambe adjourned the meeting at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kevin Khuu, Administrative Assistant Recreation and Community Services Department Minutes approved at the___ regular meeting 244 CUPERTINO's DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Input on Draft Master Plan, Additional Public Comments, though Jan. 28, 2019 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 39 Well thought out.I suggest: 1. Consider adding to MP4, 4.F, ii Safe Adventure experiences such as ropes courses, zip lines, giant slides, climbing walls, skate board parks, giant swings. Note that MP5, 5B already has some of these things, but they are focused on teens. All ages need some safe adventure. 2. Currently MP4, 4G, vii says, “Provide equipment and technology in parks to support recreation activities, especially fitness.” Add “For example a sound system that would enable regularly scheduled outdoor zumba classes” (Note that in Ecuador and other S American countries outdoor Zumba classes are held early each day and roughly 50 people attend. The cost is very low and the benefits of social interaction and exercise are huge.) 3. I see no mention of tourists. Cupertino could be a tourist destination. We have many assets tourists would enjoy including nearby museums, bicycle trails, wineries, horse back riding, hiking, birding, and Apple Campus. Being a tourist destination can be a significant economic engine powering lodging, restaurants, and guide services. In our travels we've found towns that became tourist destinations by offering nothing more than the world's largest sweater, for example. Cupertino has far more to offer as a tourist destination. Dan Marshall DanMarshall 22@Gmail.co m 38 It is very forward-thinking. It preserves resources that would otherwise be lost nothing Ron rknoack1@g mail.com 37 The plan creates a vision for a healthy sustainable community that keeps folks connected Thank you for your inclusive and thoughtful process. 36 Environmentally friendly I support the mission to restores, preserve, and protect our creeks, meadows, trees and natural areas”, and look forward to the implementation of the goal of “Conservation: Protect nature, trees and natural areas in parks and throughout the city to support wildlife, ecological functions and a stronger connection to Cupertino’s natural environment” Kim Freitas kim.freitas@ gmail.com 245 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 35 I want to give my support for the Plan’s vision which aspires to “create an inspiring, lively, healthy, diverse and sustainable community by connecting our residents to outstanding parks, nature and one another”; that you support the mission to restores, preserve, and protect our creeks, meadows, trees and natural areas”, and look forward to the implementation of the goal of “Conservation: Protect nature, trees and natural areas in parks and throughout the city to support wildlife, ecological functions and a stronger connection to Cupertino’s natural environment”. Marian Fricano fricano.maria n@gmail.co m 34 Its work connecting people with outside spaces and nature 33 Connecting residents to nature. Restoring and protecting creeks, meadows, trees and natural areas. and we helped create Protecting nature, trees and natural areas in parks to support wildlife, ecological functions. Improving park and facility access and trail connectivity. Overall I support the plan. Speed up implementation of habitat restoration 32 Bike trails The master plan needs to include more hiking trails. 31 Will help people connect to nature, and also help to restore some natural features/areas. 30 It is a comprehensive, pro-active approach to planning recreation areas and use currently and in the future. In Canmore, Canada, they did an innovative design combining their library, city administrative office, café and sports facility in one building. If the City Center site is redeveloped, it merits exploration. On page 82, the proposed changes should only be pursued if approved by City Council M.G. Wong 29 Audubon society likes it and I love keeping the nature park Can you add a trail from the orchard at blackberry on the west side of th creek back to the picnic area so we have a little loop ?? Thanks for all your hard work. It really shows !!Susan norman Norman.susa n@comcast.n et 28 I do not like it overall because it is vague and does not appear to be a plan but brainstorming with a $200Milliion price tag. The survey samples are small and not reflecting the population. Delete the Performing Arts Center. Move park equity to the top of the importance list. Halt the Stevens Creek Corridor Plan until park equity is resolved. City funds need to be allocated in a balanced way. This plan fails to take care of that both from a geographical standpoint and when addressing age groups. It’s a great start but isn’t ready. 27 Enhancements to existing parks and trails. School joint use partnerships. less indoor and theaters, items in pages 87, 88 and 89 Have more open spaces and green lawns at Northeastern part of the city. Establish new parks. Page 2 of 7 246 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 26 Seems well thought out except getting a balance across the entire city. 1. Put a General Plan Policy in place preventing ‘Quasi-Publicly’ zoned/land use areas from changing. Add a municipal code (law) that would give the City first dibs on purchasing these parcels. They are typically churches, utilities, etc. Keeping them quasi- public means they can be easily converted to parks and community facilities or fire, police substations, libraries, senior centers, etc. 2. Also, develope a relationship with fitness centers, private pools, etc. to work towards a joint relationship. #3. Page 173 of 209 (Table E1sites). Add “Joint-use sites then list - Lawson Middle School which has a track, outdoor fitness equipment, tennis and basketball courts - Sedgwick Elem School which has multiple facilities open to the public - Cupertino High which has a track, tennis courts - Fremont High School in Sunnyvale but cupertino residents have access to the pool and track - Homestead High School residents have access to the track #4 Table E-3 page 179 of 209, under Basketball Courts ADD AN ‘X’ under ‘Schools’ and ‘Public/Private Partnerships because Lawson, Sedgwick, Cupertino HS, etc come under this. Under ‘Outdoor Recreation Diversity’ ADD AN ‘X’ under ‘Schools’ they have outdoor fitness and tennis. #5 On Map D-2, add a spur off of the I-280 trail along the Apple wall (behind Larry Way) that goes from I-280 trail straight to Lawson Middle School. This would give kids in Garden Gate off- road access to the middle school (no crossing De Anza!). It would also give kids safer access to classes at Memorial Park, Quinlan, Garden Gate area. Peggy Griffin Griffin@com puserve.com 25 The idea and motivation to have a master plan for long term development is good. I think it should address the issue of park land being very insufficient on the east side of De Anza. This is a known issue and has not been addressed in at least 12 years since I moved to Cupertino. Green land will be much more important than a performing art center. The city should prioritize them. Green land park will benefit almost all residents and accessible in the daytime, any time, but performing art center has its own specific use that only a portion of the residents may benefit from it. Ping Gao gaoping@gm ail.com 24 I like that the plan has considered adding more neighborhood accessible small parks that are family friendly and close to home. I also am glad that more water play has been recommended, since this is something I wanted to bring up as I notice there is no water play facilities in the public parks in Cupertino, and every summer we had to go to other cities for the kids. I would add having more shade in the play areas. I would also recommend more public schools' sports or play ground to open up for the neighbor after school hours. 1. I hope the city would exploit more ways to approach for public inputs, the current schedules for public meetings are generally not friendly to people like me who work full time, got little kids at home, with partner or myself had to work overtime quite frequently. In this age, an app can be more convenient for us to provide feedback in such public issues that we do care. 2. I live in eastern park of Cupertino, we don't have as many parks or trails per household. I'd hope to have more trails planned in the future so we can take a walk after dinner or on the week more conveniently. Lili lili.l.xu@gmai l.com 23 Not like it Add fund for some park at east side.Don't waste city money to build art center. East side need park. Should be more urgent. Dongming yao Page 3 of 7 247 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 22 I don’t like this plan Add a park @east Cupertino We don’t need performing arts center in Cupertino , there is a Flinter center already 21 Don’t like it at all. I was totally shocked by the ridiculous master plan, especially that it claimed to spend two years and with resident outreach but still manage to resemble nothing close to the real need of the residents. It is fishy who was behind the master plan, but one thing is for sure, it is definitely not pro-resident. We don’t need performing arts center. We need parks!!! Master plan should be redone to include more parks and no performing arts center. 20 I don’t like the plan at all. This plan does not represent residents need at all. We need parks!!! Spending 100M on performing arts center is totally ridiculous. No performing arts center. More spending on parks.The master plan redone all over. 19 Not sure I can use "like" for a 20yr master plan which will change the city I live, but I did know anything about it until this week Do we need to spend $100m out of the total $204m budget 9n a performance art center?! Does every resident know about it? I for one strongly oppose to this project Remove project "performing art center" from page 104, cause I don't believe we have been well informed in this big budget spending ahead of time 18 Remove the performing art center at Vallco. It is not only costly, but also not necessary. We can use Flint Center. Add parks on the east side of Cupertino. 17 I like the part that we need to build more parks on the east side of the city- but I’m very shocking to see that among the 200M budget, 100M is devoted to a performing art center- why performing art center is consider as park, as it’s not going to be accessible every day for citizens , for two why we need a new performer art center where we already have two under utilized performance center at de Anza college already. And why another 60M for a swimming pool- how many people will use that pool? We need more park space on the east side of the city. Please add specificllly the budget that city plan to help build more park on the east side of the city . Qin Pan Qinpan@gm ail.com 16 I like that the plan is general enough to allow staff to work with. It's far better than a plan that is too detailed. page 85 CUSD is ready and available to work with the City on these plans. Steven Kaufman Kaufman_ste ven@cusdk8. org Page 4 of 7 248 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 15 The diversity of input from interest groups and community members has produced a very comprehensive plan that reasonably addresses everyone's concerns. I love that we have the opportunity to make Cupertino an even better place to live, work & go to school by improving and properly maintaining our parks & rec site. I'm most excited about improving Memorial Park, which is currently an uninviting "eyesore". No changes necessary.Keith Warner 14 -Robust, exemplary planning process led by excellent staff and consultant. -Focus on protecting nature and integrating habitat into city park policies Add educational training to ground maintenance crews about native plantings and how to care for them and keep viable habitat Cupertino should be proud of this plan!Shani Kleinhaus, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, McClellan Ranch shani@scvas.c om 13 A lot of work and public input was put into it! I love the preservation of our ecology and natural assets. I would add our historic markers into our master plan...the Native American habitats, DeAnza’s encampment and the early settlers influence I would add an historic element. So much history occurred along Stevens Creek...The Ohlone’s DeAnza encampment, Elisha Stephen’s settlement. Historic markers can memorialize Cupertino history Goals and vision should add the importance of our unique history! Donna Austin Primadona1 @comcast.ne t 12 I like that you are doing a Master Plan. And, I like that you are asking residents what we residents think should happen at our parks. I would like to see our parks without organized outside groups using them for organized soccer leagues and outside baseball groups renting them. I feel our parks should be available to our residents all the time. There is little enough space for kids to just run and play in open spaces, and to have "dis"organized groups playing volleyball, soft ball, or just running on our open green space, Yes I do: We are so fortunate, as a community, to have open green space. Let's keep it "open" to all our residents, and not just to organized groups. Ruby Elbogen rgelbogen@a ol.com Page 5 of 7 249 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 11 None. The fact that you are putting more money into a cricket field (>$5M) and Dog park (>$600K) than the sorely needed lighted basketball field (>$250K??) Not enough emphasis on having more basketball courts in the city. Most of the parks (eg. Jollyman) have excess grass area but only allocated a half sized basketball court at the moment and even those courts are neglected (surface cracked, etc). To get kids to go out and be more active especially in the winter time, create more "lighted" basketball court area. Out parks are pretty much "dead zone" after 5pm, consider looking at how some southern California towns have done in upgrading their parks so they are still pretty much utilized extensively even after 7-8pm by kids, young adults, etc. Again, number of basketball courts in the city of this size is laughable. The best court right now is not in Cupertino but in West San Jose (Calabazas Park). Andy Teoh kateoh@sbcg lobal.net 10 performing arts center, aquatics add park land on north-east side of city. consider a junior museum/zoo like in palo alto. de-prioritize jollyman park, stevens creek corridor senior center and sports center are good enough today 9 The park space is very limited around the city. Are there plans to acquire additional land to expand parks in residential neighborhoods? The current park space in the Monta Vista area, and Memorial Park is difficult to get to, especially with traffic, from other parts of the city. Blackberry Farm Park should be open year round. 8 I like the idea of increased trail connections and bike connections to the parks. Parks are getting more overburdened. We need more parks and especially parks with trees around the outside perimeter. There are more and more units being built and more people in each park. This is making the parks less desirable and off-leash dogs are taking up large sections of the parks even though it is posted "all dogs must be on-leash". Parks are getting overcrowded as residents per unit park area increases. Also, the average size of homes lot is decreasing significantly. In 2013, the average size of lot per home sold was 11,000 ft^2. But in 2018 the average size of hot per home sold was 9,000 ft^2. This is almost a 20% drop in 5 years. Homes are becoming more and more cramped and parks are too. Homes are becoming more like prisons and this is ruining the feel of Cupertino. If we stay on this trend, within 30 years, the average lot size per home sold will be 2400 ft^2. This is approaching prison-like conditions. No one would want to live in such a city. San Francisco is a mess. I don't want that crime, crowd, traffic, or stench. That is why I AM in Cupertino and not San Francisco. I will fight with the City, the State, the money- grubbing developers and whoever else wants to ruin the existing city in this way. Thanks for asking my sincere opinion. Randal Salvatore rsalvatore@i nfinera.com Page 6 of 7 250 #What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) 7 Not much Should be more accessible to the illiterate 6 I didn't read it Portals Portal park doesn't live up to its name. 5 Please spend park funds on parks. It is wrong for park funds to be spent on a duplication of the under utilized Flint center. I am very happy with Flint center. It can meet all of Cupertino’s needs. Cupertino needs more parks especially in east Cupertino. We have no need for another performing arts center. An arts center would be a misuse of precious funding. The residents of monta vista are fortunate to live amongst nature. Not so for east Cupertino. We who live east of miller live on crowded streets and in dire need of beautification and s serenity. Rancho Rinconada is the slum of Cupertino. A very expensive slum. Hanna Drive resident and parent 4 I am very hopeful that lots of trails (bike, walking, paved/unpaved) will be built. We have fantastic weather and outdoor assets - we should do everything we can to encourage people to get out of cars and walk, bike, run, skate, stroll etc. Please please please figure out how to get access from West Stevens Creek into Rancho park. There was access before, and then it was all fenced off for the flooding project. Now there is no way to enter the park without going all the way around. Please figure out how to allow pedestrians and cyclists to get to Rancho via Stevens Creek Rama Polefka 3 Interest in expanding the number of parks throughout the city by purchasing the land is good for the city. Pg. 87 Aquatics Facility has listed Wilson Park as a Potential Location. This is a small park and should not be considered for aquatics. We need to keep the ball fields at this location. Pg. 82 Longer Term Selected Enhancement Opportunities. Must modify the statement "Connect via trails and bike lane network to Cupertino High, Wilson Park and Civic Center/Library" to specify that these are subject to city council approval of design and environmental impact review. 2 It must have taken much time to draft this detail plan. To attract many responses with comments on the draft, the draft wording is a long documents for initial responses. Shorter highlighted version can interest more Cupertino citizens Shorter highlighted version can interest more responses 1 Very Little.I'm disappointed with the utter lack of genuine community engagement. Get a broad outreach of different neighborhoods and age demographics. What is going on? Please be more transparent and have genuine community engagement. Have you taken into consideration the needs of park-starved East Cupertino? Please make another attempt because Cupertino Residents demand accountability from those that hold office and commission posts R Page 7 of 7 251 CUPERTINO's DRAFT PARKS RECREATION MASTER PLAN Input on Draft Master Plan, Public Comments Received from January 29 to February 3, 2019 What do you like about the Master Plan? What would you change or add to the Master Plan? Do you have any other comments? (Please be as specific as possible. Include page numbers if known.) Name (optional) Email (optional) * This attachment will be posted under separate cover on Monday, February 4, 2019, pending the input received online via electronic comment cards between January 29 to February 3, 2019. 252 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:119-4882 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:1/16/2019 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Possible Formation of a Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) subregion allowing the City the option of trading allocation of housing needs among participating entities (continued from January 15). Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - SCC RHNA Subregion by-laws C - San Mateo County RHNA Subregion Bylaws 2011 D - RHNA subregion overview E - Pros and Cons of RHNA Subregion Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Possible Formation of a Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) subregion allowing the City the option of trading allocation of housing needs among participating entities (continued from January 15). That the City Council 1. Review the by-laws proposed for the RHNA subregion and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 19-009 authorizing the City Manager to discuss the formation of a Santa Clara County RHNA subregion and develop a work plan, budget and schedule of actions leading to the formation of a countywide RHNA subregion. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™253 394\20\2415540.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 5, 2019 Subject Possible Formation of a Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) subregion allowing the City the option of trading allocation of housing needs among participating entities. Recommended Action That the City Council: 1. Review the by-laws proposed for the Santa Clara County RHNA subregion and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 19- (Attachment A) authorizing the City Manager to discuss the formation of a Santa Clara County RHNA subregion and develop a work plan, budget and schedule of actions leading to the formation of a countywide RHNA subregion. Discussion Background This item was presented to the City Council as a consent item in January 2019. At the January 2019 meeting, the Council postponed action on this item since councilmembers wished to review the draft by-laws for the RHNA subregion that had previously been shared in August 2018 and the by-laws for the San Mateo RHNA subregion from the fourth Housing Planning cycle (see Attachments B and C.) State Planning and Zoning Law requires cities and counties to 1) adopt General Plan policies to address housing issues in each community and 2) identify adequate sites to accommodate the regional housing need allocated to that jurisdiction within a required Chapter of the General Plan called the Housing Element. A final draft of the Housing Element is sent to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for its review and approval prior to adoption by the City Council. 254 394\20\2415540.1 The process of setting targets for housing growth, a necess ary precursor to updating Housing Elements, is called the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The state mandates that different California regions begin their eight- year housing planning cycle on a staggered basis identified by the HCD. HCD determines housing demand for the state and subsequently, allocates this housing demand by region upon consultation with the regional Council of Governments (COG). The COG for each region then plans for this demand by distributing the need among all of its constituent cities and counties. By law, the methodology the COG uses to allocate the housing need must comply with State policy objectives in the Government Code and be adopted through a public process. The task of allocating the housing needs among the nine county San Francisco Bay Area falls to the Association of Bay Area Governments/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (ABAG/MTC). Once each jurisdiction receives its final RHNA from ABAG, they must amend their Housing Element to show how it plans to accommodate the growth allocation, including identifying and zoning sites appropriately, according to state law requirements. Cupertino’s next Housing Element update is expected in 2022 with the housing allocation process occurring in 2021. State law allows the formation of subregions to conduct an allocation process parallel to, but separate from, the regional COG process. Jurisdictions that have not been satisfied with housing allocation occurring at the geographically larger regional level (COG) have formed their own RHNA subregions to develop their own methodology and allocate housing in a more locally relevant regional level. In the subregional process, the COG assigns a percentage of the region's total housing need to the subregion as a whole. The subregion then has the ability to either allocate the RHNA to its members using its own methodology, provided that the subregion's methodology is consistent with the objectives listed in Government Code section 65584(d) and follows the state-mandated public process for assigning allocations, or it could accept the allocation assigned by the COG and then determine whether there are any local housing needs allocation trades that may/could be conducted. The most important specific limitation from state law is that every city and county must be assigned at least some very low and low - income units under Government Code section 65584.04(i)(2). Once a subregion arrives at a final allocation, including any trades between member jurisdictions, the subregional allocations must be submitted to the COG for approval, and the COG retains the ability to modify the allocations, if necessary, to meet state law requirements. 255 394\20\2415540.1 In the ABAG/MTC region, of which Cupertino is a part, subregions were formed in Napa, San Mateo and Solano counties for the 2015-2023 RHNA cycle. The jurisdictions in these subregions worked together to allocate their housing allocation based on local factors, and ABAG/MTC approved agreed-upon distribution. As an example, in the fifth Housing Cycle, of the 21 jurisdictions in the San Mateo subregion, seven jurisdictions did not see any changes to their COG allocated RHNA allocations, nine jurisdictions had a reduction in their RHNA allocations and 5 jurisdictions had an increase. In most cases, jurisdictions that were willing to accept more units did so because they had already contemplated the development of a higher number of units in their adopted general plan. Several jurisdictions in the Santa Clara county expressed their concerns with the regional housing allocation process from the prior housing planning cycle to the Cities Association of Santa Clara County1; as a result of which, in the interests of improving the implementation of housing in a more locally relevant regional manner, the Board adopted the exploration of a Santa Clara County RHNA subregion as a priority for the upcoming RHNA cycle (2023 - 2031.) To that end, the Board approved the formation of a Regional Housing Task Force/Subcommittee in 2015 to: 1. Develop of a framework and process needed to form and implement a subregion in Santa Clara County for the next RHNA cycle (2023 – 2031); and 2. Review potential options for further regional response. The Subcommittee presented its findings at the June 14, 201 8 Cities Association Board meeting and requested board members to take the topic of a subregion back to each individual City Council for discussion prior to the Board’s vote on the formation of a subregion. The Cupertino City Council reviewed this item at its August 21, 2018 meeting and had the following comments:  Concern that Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) are heavily weighted toward big cities;  Big cities are championing business impact fees that are levied regionally but passed on to cities that generate more housing, so big cities would receive more money since they have more developable land; 1 The Cities Association of Santa Clara County was formed in 1990 to represent the mutual interests of the diverse fifteen cities of Santa Clara County. The Cities Association presents a unified (and equal) voice to other agencies, organizations, and levels of government. 256 394\20\2415540.1  With subregions, larger cities would be motivated to force more allocation on job rich cities at the regional level (MTC/ABAG) and expect allocation trading in exchange for financial consideration at the subregional level;  Right way to allocate housing is objective needs for each City of Cupertino;  Wary of allocation trading;  Need to have vote on regional body, so proceed, but make sure staff gets answers to questions such how does a city consent to an increase in allocation (is it a majority vote or super majority vote)?;  Keep autonomy over any increases in allocation. Following input from all the jurisdictions in the Santa Clara County, at its October 11, 2018 meeting, the Cities Association Board voted unanimously to establish a subregion. The subregion Task Force will be reconvened to oversee the RHNA subregion formation process. Housing Commission Recommendation: The Housing Commission reviewed this item at its December 13, 2018 meeting and recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into discussions through the Cities Association to form a RHNA subregion. Analysis The Regional Housing Task Force/Subcommittee presented a number of items for the Board’s consideration in June and October 2018. These include proposed by- laws for the formation of the RHNA subregion (Attachment B,) an overview of the RHNA subregion (see Attachment D,) and pros and cons of forming a RHNA subregion (Attachment E.) Overview: Subregions may be formed between any two jurisdictions but must include a county. A subregion is allowed to develop its own methodology, issue draft allocations to member jurisdictions, conduct the revision and appeal processes, and issue final allocations. Each subregion is also required to ensure that its final housing allocation is consistent with the Bay Area's Sustainable Communities Strategy.2 2 The Sustainable Communities Strategy or SCS is a state -mandated, integrated long-range transportation and land use plan. Required by Senate Bill 375, all metropolitan regions in California must complete a SCS as part of a Regional Transportation Plan. In the Bay Area, ABAG/MTC is responsible for developing and adopting a SCS that integrates transportation, land use and housing to meet greenhouse gas reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The most recent SCS for the San Francisco Bay Area is the Plan Bay Area 2040, updated last in 2017. 257 394\20\2415540.1 Proposed Organization: For purposes of this RHNA subregion, the Cities Association is not proposing to change the methodology for determining the allocation (See Attachment B.) The subregion would allow cities the opportunity to make mutual agreements with cities in the subregion to trade allocations, provided such agreements are consistent with State-defined objectives and that each jurisdiction retain at least some allocation of units for low- and very low income households. Cities can choose not to make any agreements and simply accept the regional allocation. However, being a member of the subregion would allow each city a vote in the final subregional RHNA allocation. If a city chooses not to be a part of the subregion, they would neither have the opportunity to trade allocations nor have a vote in the proposed trades and allocations within the subregion. The SC county RHNA subregion could consist of one member of each City Council and one member of the County Board of Supervisors. The final structure of the subregion would be part of the discussions the City Manager would be involved in. Several standing committees that would assist in the goals of the RHNA subregion could be established. As currently proposed, these include the:  Policy Committee – elected officials provide policy direction, review the Technical Advisory Committee recommendations and adopt policy consensus for transmittal for cities and counties for ratification;  Technical Advisory Committee – Senior staff technical experts in the field of housing and land use from each jurisdiction to develop recommendations for the City Manager’s Association to consider;  City Managers Association – monthly outreach through the City Manager’s Association to allow ongoing input and consideration of the Technical Advisory Committee recommendations, prior to approval of the final by the Policy Committee;  City Councils and Board of Supervisors – Ratify the final allocation; and  ABAG – Final approval of the RHNA Final Allocation. At the January 2019 Council meeting, a question about whether the Council would adopt the by-laws was posed. As a point of clarification, the Council will not adopt the proposed by-laws. These are intended to be adopted the RHNA subregion Policy Committee at its first meeting. As previously mentioned, upon request, the by-laws of the San Mateo RHNA subregion from the prior housing element planning cycle are included as Attachment E. Timeline: State law requires that all RHNA subregions be formed by September 30, 2020 - at least 28 months prior to the Housing Element due date of January 31, 2023 (Govt. Code Section 65584.03(a)) for this region. 258 394\20\2415540.1 Pros and Cons: The Subcommittee identified several advantages of forming a RHNA subregion. These are attached as Attachment E and include:  Allowing jurisdictions flexibility and an opportunity for them to trade RHNA allocations. For e.g., notwithstanding the subregions allocation, a city could choose to accept the regional allocation or choose to make agreements with cities in the subregion for trading allocations.  Empowering cities to have a say in regional planning. For e.g. should a city’s appeal on their regional allocation get upheld, it is up to ABAG/MTC to decide how to redistribute the appealed allocation. However, with a subregion, a city can trade allocations with another city.  Allow cities to collaborate on better planned development since they can work together to address regional issues such as transit and would not necessarily be confined by a city boundary.  Create a forum to discuss sharing of planning resources. For e.g. in the San Mateo subregion, all 21 jurisdictions share in the cost to pay a consultant to assist in the preparation of their housing elements and data needs. It also identified disadvantages of the formation of a subregion, which include:  Putting in time, effort and resources and ending up with the same result as the regional allocation.  Lack of trust for a fair and equitable process.  Loss of political distance from ABAG/MTC which may result in pressure on the community to produce additional housing.  No role model since no other existing subregion has such large variance in population in each of the cities. Impact of new housing laws: Recent and proposed changes to housing laws may also impact the effect of subregions in future housing cycles. For example, SB 166 was adopted in 2017 to require jurisdictions to make specific findings or upzone additional property if development on housing element sites is proposed and/or approved at different affordability levels than are shown in the housing element's inventory. This requirement may make jurisdictions more hesitant to accept additional lower income RHNA allocations than they have been previously, because there are greater consequences of not approving housing for lower - income households. Other 2017 changes in housing element law have increased the standards for designating acceptable sites to accommodate housing development, so even if a jurisdiction wants to accept a higher allocation of RHNA, it may not have adequate sites available to do so. Finally, two bills signed by the Governor in September 2018, AB 1771 and SB 828, give HCD additional review authority over regional and subregion al allocations 259 394\20\2415540.1 and, in general, would assign more units to high-income, high-job cities. If these bills are adopted, it could further impact potential subregional processes in Santa Clara County and throughout the state, particularly in job-rich cities. In addition to these recently adopted laws, future laws could also severely impact cities ability to negotiate trades. These and other issues will be discussed and evaluated by the City Manager in presenting staff’s recommendation at a later date. What are other cities doing?: Most of the cities in Santa Clara County have signed resolutions authorizing their City Manager to enter into discussions on the formation of a RHNA subregion. While the City of Milpitas has not, as yet, taken action on formation of a RHNA subregion, the item is on the Council agenda for February 5, 2019. Fiscal Impact It is expected that there will be costs associated with the establishment of a RHNA subregion related to administration, legal review, outreach, noticing and communicating with ABAG/MTC. The Cities Association expects that an estimate for the Santa Clara County RHNA subregion will be developed as the process moves along but does not expect it to be high. It is anticipated that the costs of participation will be low since existing infrastructure, e.g. the Cities Association, and staff from each individual city will be used, and that the primary expenses will be for noticing and hosting of public meetings for the RHNA subregion.. Conclusion Given the pros and cons, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into discussions related to the formation of a Santa Clara County RHNA subregion and develop a work plan, budget and schedule of actions leading to the formation of a countywide RHNA subregion. Keeping abreast of the subregional activity on RHNA trades will require staff time in any case. Additionally, being a part of the RHNA subregion will allow the City the flexibility to trade allocations if an opportunity arose and the opportunity to vote on the RHNA trades of other jurisdictions in the County as well. Next Steps If authorized to, the City Manager will engage in discussions related to the RHNA subregion, and as noted earlier, the RHNA subregion will be formed no later than September 2020. Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Principal Planner 260 394\20\2415540.1 Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager Authorized for Submission by: Timm Borden, Interim City Manager Attachments A. Draft Resolution B. Santa Clara County RHNA subregion proposed by-laws C. San Mateo County RHNA subregion bylaws 2011 D. RHNA subregion Overview E. Pros and Cons of RHNA subregion 261 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 19 - XXX OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO INDICATING INTENT TO SUPPORT FORMATION OF A HOUSING SUBREGION OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS TO FACILITATE AND IMPLEMENT COUNTYWIDE HOUSING PRODUCTION CONSISTENT WITH THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION (RHNA) FORMULA CURRENTLY ASSIGNED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS (ABAG) WHEREAS, Housing Element Law (Gov. Code Sections 65580 – 65589.8) provides for a Regional Housing Need Allocation process (RHNA); and WHEREAS, to implement such RHNA process in the San Francisco Bay Area, the State of California has delegated to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) responsibility to adopt an allocation methodology, then use the adopted methodology to assign to each jurisdiction in the Bay Area the obligation to zone enough housing development capacity to accommodate production of a specific number of housing units during the period from 2023 through 2031; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65584.03 provides that certain combinations of local governments may form a subregion to perform RHNA for themselves in order to allocate among themselves the total number of housing units assigned to the m collectively by ABAG; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino is interested in exploring the formation of a Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) subregion consistent with the California Government Code Section 65584 et seq and acceptable to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to facilitate collaboration with the county and all cities in the County of Santa Clara, to efficiently and effectively deliver housing production goals; and WHEREAS, the Board of the Cities Association of Santa Clara County has directed the review of the benefits of such a subregion and subsequently representatives of the Cities Association of Santa Clara County (CASCC) have formed a committee to ev aluate and 262 make recommendations regarding the importance of and opportunities for success through shared housing strategies which could be facilitated by a subregional effort; and WHEREAS, the committee formed by the CASCC has proposed draft by-laws for the RHNA subregion which have been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Cupertino at its duly noticed February 5, 2019 City Council meeting; WHEREAS, housing is a countywide challenge, and housing production types, numbers, density, appropriateness and affordability levels can vary in different communities, and the Cities’ recognize all production types are important to the housing supply of the County and its related economic and social health; and WHEREAS, Cities are individually accountable for, and retain full local authority for, identifying sites for housing development and for adopting and implementing housing policies intended to facilitate production of housing to meet local, regional and state policy objectives embodied in the numbers prescribed by ABAG the Sustainable Community Strategy that will be adopted by ABAG and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in 2021; and WHEREAS, through mutual cooperation and planning, the production of these housing units may be enhanced through collective efforts and resources, therefore creating a forum for developing countywide policy consensus on matters related to the Sustainable Community Strategy; NOW, THEREFORE, upon review of all the documents and information presented to the City Council, the City Council of the City of Cupertino does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows: Section 1: That it is in the best interest of the City to join with other cities in Santa Clara County to explore creation of the RHNA subregion and that by working together to plan for housing growth, the stage is set for implementing housing and more housing will ultimately be built to meet the needs of the entire County. Section 2: That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to enter into discussions regarding the formation of a RHNA subregion and the development of a workplan and budget, and schedule of actions leading to the countywide, self - administration of the housing needs allocation process, allocating the countywide total housing needs allocation among all the Cities and unincorporated County by consensus. The item will be scheduled before the City Council for the ultimate decision whether to join a RHNA subregion. 263 PASSED AND ADOPTED this __th day of ____________, 2019, at the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Grace Schmidt Steven Scharf City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 264 By-laws of the Santa Clara County Subregional RHNA Process PURPOSE & BYLAWS The cities within the County of Santa Clara, and the County of Santa Clara, have adopted resolutions to participate as a Subregion (hereinafter referred to as “Subregion”) in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Process. The Cities Association of Santa Clara County (hereinafter referred to as “CASCC”) will act as the representative for the Subregion. The Subregion hereby adopts the following bylaws for the purpose of providing for the orderly conduct of its affairs. ARTICLE I NAME The name of the separate entity established by the resolutions is the “Santa Clara County Sub- Regional RHNA Process” and may be referred to as “Subregion”. ARTICLE II PURPOSES Section 1. Subregion shall have the following purposes: (a) Plan, organize, and maintain the work of the Subregion and be responsible for its overall operation; (b) Advise City Managers, City Councils and the Board of Supervisors of all significant activities of the Subregion; (c) Prepare, review, monitor, present to the cities and the County, and facilitate a consensus on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation housing shares for all the cities and the County for the 2021 Housing Element; (d) Submit to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for approval the housing shares for Santa Clara County (cities and County). (e) Provide a forum for developing a countywide policy consensus, to the greatest extent possible, on matters related the Sustainable Communities Strategy process of which the Regional Housing Needs Allocation is a part; and a channel for communicating such consensus to the Joint Policy Committee of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments overseeing the Sustainable Communities Strategy process from time to time when such a consensus is requested or required by the Joint Policy Committee. 265 Section 2. Subregion shall not participate in or endorse any political activity involving any individual candidate for public office. The selection of officers within Article IV herein shall not be considered a political activity subject to this section. ARTICLE III MEMBERS Section 1. The County of Santa Clara and each city which has adopted a resolution of participation shall be members of the Subregion. Section 2. The RHNA Policy Committee (PC) of the Subregion shall consist of a member of the City Council of each participating city to be selected by that city, and one member of the Board of Supervisors to be selected by the Board of Supervisors. Section 3. Each member City Council and the Board of Supervisors may select one alternate member from its body who shall participate when the regular member is absent. Section 4. If both the member and the alternate will be absent, the City or County, respectively, may designate a substitute for that meeting and notify CASCC, in writing, of the designation. Section 5. Any member may withdraw from the Subregion by adopting a resolution and providing a written notice of intention to do so to the chairperson of the PC. The rights and obligations of any such member shall terminate 30 days after acceptance by the PC. Section 6. If any member, or designated representative, fails to attend two consecutive meetings, without notification of the Chairperson or the Executive Director, the Chairperson will notify the City Council or Board of Supervisors to encourage future participation. ARTICLE IV- OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the PC shall consist of a chairperson and vice chairperson. Section 2. The chairperson and vice chairperson shall be elected by the PC and shall serve at the will of the PC. Section 3. Nomination for officers of the PC shall be made from the floor. Nominations shall be made by voting members of the PC only. Section 4. The chairperson and vice chairperson must be voting members of the PC. Section 5. Nominations and election of the chairperson shall precede nominations and election of the vice chairperson. Voting shall be public. 266 Section 6. The chairperson shall preside at all meetings and may call special meetings when necessary. Section 7. The vice chairperson shall perform the duties of the chairperson in the absence of the chairperson. Section 8. A special election shall be called by the Board of Directors if the chairperson and/or vice chairperson is unable to serve. Section 9. All officers shall serve without compensation. Section 10. The chairperson or vice chairperson may be removed from office at any time by a majority vote of those members present. ARTICLE V STAFF SUPPORT Section 1. The CASCC Executive Director, CASCC staff and contractors shall provide support to the Subregion and all the established committees. Section 2. The PC shall have dealings with staff and contractors through the CASCC Executive Director. Section 3. All participating jurisdictions will share in the cost. ARTICLE VI COMMITTEES/ STAKEHOLDER REVIEW Section 1. The following standing committees shall assist in accomplishing the goals of the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUB REGIONAL RHNA PROCESS: • RHNA Policy Committee • RHNA Technical Advisory Committee • City Managers Association • City Councils and Board of Supervisors • Association of Bay Area Governments Section 2. RHNA Policy Committee (PC) - 16 Members, one member from each city and the county, composed of elected officials. The primary role is to provide initial policy input to the process, review the RHNA TAC recommendations and adopt a policy consensus for transmittal to the cities and the County for ratification. Section 3. RHNA Technical Advisory Committee (RHNA TAC) - 16 Members - One member from each city and the county. Composed of senior staff technical experts in the field of housing and land use. Member agencies may flexibly assign different technical experts as a function of the 267 subject being discussed. However, it is important that there be good communications between the different representatives such that issues do not need to be repeated or there are no conflicting positions from the representatives. Primary role is technical development of the issues and solutions. Section 4. City Managers Association - Monthly reports will be provided to the City Managers through the City Managers Association. This will allow ongoing input by the City Managers in the process. The final product will be presented to the City Managers for their recommendation to the RHNA PAC for approval of the final product. Primary role of the City Managers is practical assessment of the issues and solutions. Section 5. City Councils/ Board of Supervisors - Primary role is ratification of the RHNA Final Allocation prior to submittal to Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). Section 6. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - Final approval of RHNA Final Allocation. Section 7. An appeals process will be established by the PC in conjunction with ABAG to hear appeals by any cities or the County that disagree with their housing share as allocated by the Subregion. ARTICLE VII MEETINGS Section 1. The PC shall establish by resolution the date, time, and place for regular PC meetings. Section 2. The PC may hold special meetings called in accordance with Article IV, Section 6. Section 3. All meetings of the PC shall be held in accordance with the Brown Act, Government Code section 54950 Ct seq. ARTICLE VIII CONDUCT OF BUSINESS Section 1. A quorum shall consist of at least a majority of the members and shall be required for all meetings of the PC. Section 2. Except as state otherwise in these by-laws, all decisions of the PC shall be by majority vote of those present. Section 3. Adoption of the Final Regional Housing Needs Allocation shall require: 1. consent of a majority of all cities and the County participating in the Subregion, and 2. consent of each jurisdiction that has been allocated a greater share of housing than the ABAG default allocation. 268 Section 4. Upon adoption of the final regional housing numbers, the subregion will share support for outcome and support each other, for example the subregaion releasing a resolution, annual report, and press event. Section 5. Except as provided in these bylaws, or by a majority vote of those present, Roberts Rule of Order Revised shall constitute the parliamentary authority for the PC. Section 6. These by-laws may be amended by a two-thirds majority vote of members present and who represent a majority of all cities and the County. ARTICLE IX OTHER MATTERS Section 1. No member shall receive compensation or reimbursement from PC or CASCC for expenses incurred in attending any meeting or other function. 269 BYLAWS OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY SUB REGIONAL RHNA PROCESS The County of San Mateo and the cities within the County of San Mateo have adopted resolutions to participate as a Subregion (hereinafter referred to as “Subregion”) in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Process. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (hereinafter referred to as “CCAG”) will act as the representative for the Subregion. The “Subregion” hereby adopts the following bylaws for the purpose of providing for the orderly conduct of its affairs. ARTICLE I NAME The name of the separate entity established by the resolutions is the “San Mateo County Sub-Regional RHNA Process”and may be referred to as “Subregion”. ARTICLE II PURPOSES Section 1. Subregion shall have the following purposes operating through the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) for control, direction and administration. (a) Plan, organize, and maintain the work of the Subregion and be responsible for its overall operation. (b) Advise City Managers, City Councils and the Board of Supervisors of all significant activities of the Subregion. (c) Prepare, review, monitor, present to the cities and the County, and facilitate a consensus on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation housing shares for all the cities and the County for the 2014 Housing Element. (d) Present to the City Councils and the Board of Supervisors for approval of the housing shares for the 2014 Housing Element. (e) Submit to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for approval the housing shares for San Mateo County (cities and County). (f) Provide a forum for developing a countywide policy consensus, to the greatest extent possible, on matters related the Sustainable Communities Strategy process of which the Regional Housing Needs Allocation is a part; and a channel for communicating such consensus to the Joint Policy Committee overseeing the Sustainable Communities Strategy process from time to time when such a consensus is requested or required by the Joint Policy Committee. Section 2. Subregion shall not participate in or endorse any political activity involving 270 any individual candidate for public office. The selection of officers within Article IV herein shall not be considered a political activity subject to this section. ARTICLE III MEMBERS Section 1. The County of San Mateo and each city which has adopted a resolution of participation shall be members of the Subregion. Section 2. The RHNA Policy Advisory Committee (RHNA PAC) of the Subregion shall consist of a member of the City Council of each participating city to be selected by that city and one member of the Board of Supervisors to be selected by the Board of Supervisors. Section 3. Each member City Council and the Board of Supervisors may select one alternate member from its body who shall participate when the regular member is absent. Section 4. If both the member and the alternate will be absent the City Council or Board of Supervisors may designate a substitute for that meeting and notify CCAG, in writing, of the designation. Section 5. Any member may withdraw from the Subregion by adopting a resolution and providing a written notice of intention to do so with the chairperson of the Policy Advisory Committee. The rights and obligations of any such member shall terminate 30 days after acceptance by the RHNA Policy Advisory Committee (RHNA PAC). Section 6. If any member, or designated representative, fails to attend three consecutive meetings, without notification of the Chairperson or the Executive Director, the Chairperson will notify the City Council or Board of Supervisors to encourage future participation. Section 7. San Mateo County Transportation Authority and SamTrans shall each appoint or designate a member of each respective governing board to the RHNA PAC. The representative may be one of the RHNA PAC members who has been appointed by a city or the County, serving in a dual role. Transportation agency representatives shall be full members of the RHNA PAC for all matters pertaining to the Sustainable Communities Strategic, except they shall serve in an ex officio, non-voting capacity for certain actions required by Regional Housing Needs Allocation process, namely adoption of the RHNA Methodology, the Draft Allocation and the Final Allocation. ARTICLE IV- OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the RHNA Policy Advisory Committee shall consist of a chairperson and vice chairperson. Section 2. The chairperson and vice chairperson shall be elected by the RHNA Policy Advisory Committee and shall serve at the will of the RHNA PAC. Section 3. Nomination for officers of the RHNA Policy Advisory Committee shall be 271 made from the floor. Nominations shall be made by voting members of the RHNA Policy Advisory Committee only. Section 4. The chairperson and vice chairperson must be voting members of the RHNA Policy Advisory Committee. Section 5. Nominations and election of the chairperson shall precede nominations and election of the vice chairperson. Voting shall be public. Section 6. The chairperson shall preside at all meetings and may call special meetings when necessary. Section 7. The vice chairperson shall perform the duties of the chairperson in the absence of the chairperson. Section 8. A special election shall be called by the Board of Directors if the chairperson and/or vice chairperson is unable to serve. Section 9. All officers shall service without compensation. Section 10. The chairperson or vice chairperson may be removed from office at any time by a majority vote of those members present. ARTICLE V STAFF SUPPORT Section 1. The C/CAG Executive Director, C/CAG staff and contractors including the County Department of Housing, shall provide support to San Mateo County Sub Regional RHNA Process and all the established committees. Section 2. The RHNA PAC shall have dealings with staff and contractors through the C/CAG Executive Director. ARTICLE VI COMMITTEES/ STAKEHOLDER REVIEW Section 1. The following standing committees have been established to assist in accomplishing the goals of the SAN MATEO COUNTY SUB REGIONAL RHNA PROCESS: RHNA Technical Advisory Committee RHNA Policy Advisory Committee City Managers Association (Stakeholder) City Councils and Board of Supervisors (Stakeholder) Association of Bay Area Governments (Stakeholder) 272 Section 2. RHNA Technical Advisory Committee (RHNA TAC) - 21 Members - One member from each city and the County. Composed of senior staff technical experts in the field of housing and land use. Member agencies may flexibly assign different technical experts as a function of the subject being discussed. However, it is important that there be good communications between the different representatives such that issues do not need to be repeated or there are no conflicting positions from the representatives. Primary role is technical development of the issues and solutions. Committee also includes ex officio members from Transporation Agency and SamTrans. Section 3. RHNA Policy Advisory Committee (RHNA PAC) - 21 Members - One member from each city and the County. Composed of elected officials. Primary role is to provide initial policy input to the process, review the RHNA TAC recommendations and adopt a policy consensus for transmittal to the cities and the County for ratification. Committee also includes ex officio members from Transporation Agency and SamTrans. Section 4. City Managers Association - Monthly reports will be provided to the City Managers through the City Managers Association. This will allow ongoing input by the City Managers in the process. The final product will be presented to the City Managers for their recommendation to the RHNA PAC for approval of the final product. Primary role of top management is practical assessment of the issues and solutions. Section 5. City Councils/ Board of Supervisors - Primary role is ratification of the RHNA Final Allocation prior to submittal to Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). Section 6. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) - Final approval of RHNA Final Allocation. Section 7. An appeals process will be established by the RHNA PAC in conjunction with ABAG for those cities and the County that disagree with their established housing share. ARTICLE VII MEETINGS Section 1. The RHNA Policy Advisory shall establish by resolution the date, time, and place for regular RHNA PAC meetings Section 2. All meetings of the RHNA PAC AND RHNA TAC shall be held in accordance with the Brown Act, Government Code section 54950 Ct seq. Section 3. The RHNA PAC shall have such other meetings as are deemed necessary. ARTICLE VIII CONDUCT OF BUSINESS Section 1. A quorum shall consist of at least a majority of the voting members and shall be required for all meetings of the RHNA PAC. 273 Section 2. All decisions shall be by majority vote of those present. Section 3. Final adoption of the housing shares needs to be by consensus since each city and the County can accept or reject their housing shares. Section 4. Except as provided in these bylaws, or by a majority vote of those present, Roberts Rule of Order Revised shall constitute the parliamentary authority for the RHNA PAC. ARTICLE IX OTHER MATTERS Section 1. No member shall receive compensation or reimbursement from RHNA PAC or C/CAG for expenses incurred in attending any meeting or other function. 274 275 Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Subregion Overview 1 What is a RHNA subregion? (Government Code Section 65584.03) In recognition of the common interests and mutual challenges and opportunities associated with providing housing, two or more contiguous cities and a county may form a subregional entity for the purpose of allocation of the subregion’s existing and projected need for housing among its members in accordance with the allocation methodology established pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.04. All decisions of the subregion shall be approved by vote as provided for in the rules adopted by the local governments comprising the subregion, or shall be approved by vote of the county and the majority of the cities with the majority of population within the county. What are the steps to create a subregion, following the prescribed timelines in State law? 1. Each participating jurisdiction adopts a resolution indicating its commitment to participating in the subregional entity. 2. For Santa Clara County, the subregional entity could be a committee of the Cities Association with participating cities and the County. 3. The Cities Association (or other entity) would enter into an agreement with the Council of Governments (COG, in our case ABAG/MTC) that sets forth the process, timing, and other terms and conditions of the delegation of responsibility by the COG to the subregion. What does the subregion do, following the prescribe timelines in State law? 1. The subregion determines the methodology for allocating housing need to its participating jurisdictions according to State law (or accepts the methodology factors from the COG as a starting point for further distribution), providing opportunity for public comment and modification prior to adoption of the methodology. 2. The COG allocates a share to the subregion based on a proportion consistent with the distribution of households assumed for the comparable time period of the applicable regional transportation plan. 3. The subregion allocates the distribution of the RHNA to the participating jurisdictions according to the adopted methodology, providing an opportunity for public comment and modification prior to finalizing the distribution. What is the estimated cost of a subregion versus typical participation in the RHNA process? Assuming that the subregion does not hire a consultant to create a separate methodology, the costs would be: 1. Administrating and documenting the subregion meetings and decisions; 2. Conducting the required outreach prior to the subregion making its decisions ; 3. Communicating with ABAG/MTC as needed; and 4. Publishing the required notices. The Planning Departments of the participating jurisdictions typically absorb the RHNA evaluation without additional staffing or consultant assistance. 276 Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Subregion Overview 2 What are other activities that the subregion could assume outside of the RHNA process and State law?  Foster collaboration between cities within Santa Clara County o Focus on Measure A implementation o Facilitate an open dialogue between the jurisdictions, public, and interested organizations on housing issues and opportunities o Share best practices regarding rehabilitating existing housing stock, addressing gentrification/displacement, etc.  Work together to obtain and commit more financial resources to affordable housing production o Support for 2018 ballot measure for affordable housing funding o Consider potential legislative efforts to seek meaningful tax credits and other mechanisms 277 SANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE PROS & CONS OF RHNA SUBREGION FORMATION Pros Cons Example Creates flexibility & allows cities to trade Distribute the subregion’s numbers or can use ABAG’s distribution Empowers cities to have a say in the regional planning process Self-determination: a city is able to accept or not accept allocation from another city. Allows better alignment between local and regional needs Ability to plan along on transit corridors and near employment. Can find innovative solutions Collective problem-solving which may include negotiating credits and creative financing May facilitate the production of more housing Utilizes economies of scale and eliminates duplication. Siting housing near supportive services. Creates a forum for collaboration that leads to innovative solutions San Mateo County Trade Woodside/Redwood City & Daly City/Colma/County Creates awareness (and healthy competition) Creates a forum to share knowledge and success. When one city is doing the heavy lifting, may encourage other jurisdictions to step up to the plate. If success, may create additional opportunities for collaborative work Success may be housing or spill over to other technical areas (transportation). May use collaboration for legislative advocacy. Better development Cities can work together to build near transit and not 278 SANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE PROS & CONS OF RHNA SUBREGION FORMATION necessarily confined by a city boundary. Creates a forum to discuss sharing of planning resources Share resources - - may share in cost to pay consultants for housing element preparation or program ideas (for those who want to share). Time, effort & resources which may end in same result. What if subregion fails to produce a different allocation? Lack of trust for fair and equitable process. Some cities may shirk their responsibility to step up and accept housing. Increases local control Ability to control own numbers and improve county-wide performance. Loss of political distance from MTC and ABAG Pressure on community to produce additional housing. Lack of clarity of the benefits to accept someone’s numbers/housing City worried about allocation dumping Still need to plan for housing for all income levels Can’t go to zero. Every jurisdiction still has an allocation in every income level. No role model No other subregion has such large population variances. Increased use of ADUs ADUs more feasible with cities with large residential lots. 279 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4460 Name: Status:Type:Ordinances and Action Items Agenda Ready File created:In control:10/4/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Adopt a resolution to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments:Staff Report A - Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study B - Draft Resolution Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Adopt a resolution to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Adopt Resolution No 19-020 to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™280 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: February 5, 2019 Subject Adopt a resolution to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Recommended Actions Adopt Resolution No. 19-XXX to approve the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Background The Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan (Bike Plan), adopted by City Council in 2016, is a long-range planning document designed to encourage bicycling as a safe, practical and healthy alternative to the motor vehicle. Similarly, the Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan (Ped Plan), adopted by City Council in 2018, provides the blueprint for Cupertino to achieve its vision of an inviting, safe and connected pedestrian network that enhances the quality of life for all community members and visitors. Within both of these Plans, the need for a shared bicycle-pedestrian path or trail along the Junipero Serra Channel, parallel to and immediately south of Interstate 280, is highlighted. Within the Bike Plan and the Ped Plan, the Junipero Serra Trail is identified as a Tier 1 (high priority) project. It is also one leg of the larger The Loop Cupertino Trail, which would provide a mostly off-street network of bike paths circumnavigating the city. The Junipero Serra Trail is anticipated to provide a vital off- street east-west connection across Cupertino for bicyclists and pedestrians, a facility which currently does not exist and for which demand has been demonstrated by a broad spectrum of the community, including school-aged children, parents, commuters/local workers, and Walk Bike Cupertino, a local advocacy organization. Persons potentially not supporting the project include residents who live in close proximity to the trail, citing concerns primarily related to privacy and security. FY17/18 capital budget authorized the funding of the Junipero Serra Trail feasibility study, which was funded by a $250,000 contribution from Apple as a condition of their Development Agreement with the City for the Apple Park development . In August 2017, city staff hired Callander Associates to complete this work. The study includes a review of existing conditions along the trail alignment, research and documentation of trail design criteria, the development and evaluation of various trail alternatives, the development of cost estimates, and a rigorous public outreach process. 281 Discussion The Junipero Serra Trail would extend along a Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) maintenance road that runs adjacent to the Junipero Serra Channel, an existing drainage ditch parallel to and immediately south of Interstate 280 that runs between the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge and Calabazas Creek. At Calabazas Creek, the trail will turn south and follow the SCVWD maintenance road on west side of Calabazas Creek to Vallco Parkway. The Project would include three roadway crossings, at Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard, and Wolfe Road. The alignment is primarily within the SCVWD right-of-way and would use the existing SCVWD maintenance/access road along most of its length. The channel was originally designed and constructed by Caltrans to intercept drainage on the south side of Interstate 280 when the freeway was built. The channel generally has a trapezoidal section and is concrete-lined west of Wolfe Road. East of Wolfe Road, the channel is unlined until the confluence with Calabazas Creek. The trail would utilize the existing SCVWD maintenance road which varies in width from approximately 7’-6” to more than 15’-0”, with the narrowest sections being along the westernmost extent of the channel in the vicinity of the Don Burnett Bridge. For the purposes of studying feasibility, the trail was divide d into three segments. Segment 1 is defined as the segment between the Don Burnett Bridge and De Anza Boulevard; segment 2 is the segment between De Anza Boulevard (including the intersection) and Wolfe Road; and segment 3 is the segment between Wolfe Roa d and Vallco Parkway. See attachment A, Figure 3-4 and Figures 3-12 thru 3-14, for an aerial depiction of the proposed trail. There are several challenging conditions and locations along the creek. The first is the constrained width of the existing maintenance road, especially towards the west end where the 7’-6” width is insufficient to accommodate a Class I multi-use trail, which is specified by Caltrans as a 10-foot-wide two-way bicycle facility with two-foot shoulders on each side. The second is the Stelling Road street crossing, where the maintenance road currently intersects Stelling Road at roadway grade, the channel converts to a box culvert under the roadway and there is no existing controlled intersection that would allow for a user-friendly trail crossing. The third is the De Anza Boulevard crossing, where the combination of a busy freeway interchange, major arterial roadway and utility constraints make constructing a safe, convenient and cost-effective trail crossing problematic. Finally, due to being constrained by Interstate 280 on the north, private property on the south and infrequent roadway crossings, much of the trail would not be proximate to trailhead access, resulting in special consideration being necessary to ensure adequate safety and security for trail users. 282 Several alternatives were considered in the study to address these, and several lesser, challenges. These, as well as a general description of the trail alig nment, are described below by segment. Segment 1 Segment 1 runs between the Don Burnett Bridge (Mary Avenue) and the west side of De Anza Boulevard. Starting at the western-most trail extent, segment 1 begins at the Don Burnett Bridge plaza. The bridge approach plaza presents a choice for how to access the trail within the SCVWD corridor at this location. The existing bridge approach slopes up from the Mary Avenue/Meteor Drive intersection to meet the bridge deck elevation over Interstate 280, while access to the Junipero Serra Trail requires an access path, on either the east or west side of the bridge approach, to slope down from the Mary Avenue/Meteor Drive intersection in order to conform with grades at the SCVWD maintenance road. Both access path options are feasible. The east option runs along the east side of the bridge approach, directly behind residential properties along Nathanson Avenue. Due to considerable cross-slopes and limited space, the trail would need to be narrower than a standard Class I facility. In addition, a retaining wall would be required, and several mature trees would need to be removed. The west option runs along the west side of the bridge approach, adjacent to the Loc-N-Stor facility. There is more space on this side of the bridge approach, fewer impacted trees, and a full Class I facility could be provided. The community at large, local residents, and staff recommend considering only the west side option moving forward due to its lower cost, higher feasibility, and lower impact. Continuing eastward from the bridge, the trail would follow the channel alignment behind single family residences and PG&E towers for about half mile to Stelling Road. As noted previously, the maintenance road, which is immediately adjacent to the concrete channel, is as narrow as 7’-6” along this section. This would not allow a trail to be built to full Class I standards; additionally, the SCVWD would not allow a railing to be constructed separating the trail from the channel in this case. In order to address this challenge, the open channel could be converted into a box culvert, which would essentially fully enclose the channel and which would allow the trail, at full Class I standards and including considerable trail amenities, to be placed directly over the culvert. This box culvert alternative, however, has considerable cost implications and would likely require that ownership and maintenance responsibility for the culvert be transferred from the SCVWD to the City. In the absence of a concrete box culvert, a trail which is narrower than Class I standard could be constructed. While constructing a trail to Class I standards is ideal, there are no demonstrated safety issues with constructing a narrower trail and trails as narrow as eight feet wide are commonly constructed throughout the region. 283 Stelling Road presents a street crossing challenge within this segment. The SCVWD maintenance road intersects Stelling Road; however, there is no controlled intersection at this location, the channel flows into a box culvert underneath Stelling Road, and traffic volumes along Stelling Road are substantial. At the community meetings, a desire for a grade-separated crossing for trail user convenience and safety was heard, so several options were evaluated. These included a bike-pedestrian bridge over Stelling Road, a tunnel underneath the road, and an undercrossing that would ramp down underneath the road onto Caltrans right-of-way. Of these options, the undercrossing minimizes utility conflicts and eliminates space constraint concerns that exist with both the bridge and tunnel options, and so was the preferred option moving forward. At - grade connections to Stelling Road would still be provided for trail access with this option. The trail continues east from Stelling Road towards De Anza Boulevard. This sectio n of segment 1 is located behind the Villages at Cupertino residential community, Public Storage, and the multi-family residential development at 10745 De Anza Boulevard. Segment 2 Segment 2 extends from De Anza Boulevard, inclusive of the intersection, to Wolfe Road. Maintenance road widths along this segment are generally less than the ideal minimum 14’-0”, but wider than those within Segment 1. The significant challenge within this segment is the crossing of De Anza Boulevard. Three options were evaluated: constructing a tunnel underneath De Anza Boulevard, constructing a bridge over De Anza Boulevard, and using the existing at-grade crossing at the De Anza Boulevard/Interstate 280 southbound ramp. There are a number of obstacles and constraints to building a tunnel. Property acquisition would be required on both sides of De Anza Boulevard to accommodate stairs, the tunnel will directly conflict with underground utilities, and there is a conflict with a large steel PG&E pole, which would need to be relocated. The bridge option presents fewer obstacles, though engineering challenges with respect to avoiding high - voltage overhead electrical wires still exist. Use of the existing at -grade crossing, instead of constructing a grade-separated structure, is the least expensive alternative and poses the fewest engineering challenges; however, this introduces potential pedestrian-vehicle conflicts that would need to be managed. This could be mitigated by providing a separate pedestrian-crossing-only phase at the intersection, however, a preliminary discussion with Caltrans indicates that an additional lane on the southbound off-ramp would be required in this case in order to keep an acceptable level of service at the intersection. This would necessarily increase costs considerably. Continuing eastward, the trail alignment approaches Lucille Avenue, where the creek parallels the street for ¼ mile before entering a short culvert under Blaney Ave, which is 284 elevated at this location to pass over Interstate 280. The Lucille Avenue segment presents an opportunity for either continuous or discrete trail access, as well as landscaping. Continuing east from Blaney Ave, the trail would continue behind Lock It Up Storage and residential neighborhoods, to Wolfe Ro ad. There is a CalWater facility at the north end of Portal Avenue that could potentially be used as a trail access point, subject to further discussions with CalWater and the neighboring residents. Segment 3 Segment 3 of the trail extends from the west side of Wolfe Road, continuing east along the Junipero Serra Channel to Calabazas Creek, where it turns south and follows the west side of the creek to Vallco Parkway. The channel is unlined along this entire segment. It is anticipated that the trail would utilize the Perimeter Road undercrossing of Wolfe Road, which would likely be improved as a condition of the Vallco site development. The trail would connect to the Hyatt House project on the east side of Wolfe Road, which is constructing a 10’-wide trail as part of their project. A full Class I trail would then continue eastward along the SCVWD maintenance road alignment as described above to Vallco Parkway. At Vallco Parkway, trailhead access would be provided adjacent to Calabazas Creek on the north side of Vallco Parkway. Outreach and Public Hearings Staff committed to providing a robust community outreach process as part of this feasibility study and developed multiple formats for community dialogue and interaction. Following is a list of methods used to notify and inform the community:  City website  City Channel  Social Media – Next Door, Facebook, Twitter  Flyer Postings at Library and City Hall  Door hangars and flyers to residents and businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail  Safe Routes to School monthly newsletters  Postcard mailings to residents and businesses within 300 feet of the proposed trail  Email notification to subscribers of the “Bicycle Transportation Plan” email list  Email notification to the Cupertino block leaders in the nearby surrounding neighborhoods Community meetings and events were the primary means of obtaining input from the public. The public outreach plan included hosting four community meetings, held December 6, 2017, February 20, 2018, February 26, 2018, and June 6, 2018, and attending 285 two community events, between September 2017 and June 2018. Additionally, the trail was discussed at Bicycle Pedestrian Commission meetings held on March 21, October 17, and December 19, 2018. The community meetings were designed as “open house” style events within a two- hour time window on weekday evenings. The rooms were set up with stations which participants could navigate while reviewing project background information and segment-specific details. Participants were invited to provide feedback directly to staff, as well as submit written surveys and comment cards. In addition to the community meetings, staff hosted an information table at the Diwali Festival at Memorial Park on September 30, 2017 and at the Earth Day Festival at the Cupertino Civic Center on April 21, 2018. The tables were utilized to disseminate project information and meeting dates as well as to allow the community to review and comment on the project concepts. Community response to the project was mixed, although generally positive. Approximately half of the attendees at the community meetings indicated that they lived in close proximity to the trail, and roughly two -thirds of those responding to the written surveys were in favor of the trail. General concerns raised by attendees pertained to the safety and security of trail users with respect to the relatively long distances between trail access points, trail crossings of major streets, and the constrained width of the trail, especially towards the western end. Location-specific concerns were raised mainly with respect to the neighborhoods in the vicinity of the Don Burnett Bridge and Lucille Avenue/Blaney Ave, where the potential for increased parking and traffic impacts, and noise/security concerns resulting from trail users, were raised. Details of the public outreach feedback can be found within Chapter 3, as well as the Appendix, of the Study. The Feasibility Study has considered and researched these concerns, and offers a toolbox of potential mitigation measures, including:  Installation of lighting, security cameras and/or emergency call boxes along the extent of the trail, where feasible.  Sheriff will regularly patrol the trail, including bicycle patrols. Patrols will likely be conducted daily and more often as necessary.  Coordinate with adjacent property owners to construct new seven-foot-high wooden fencing as part of the City’s project cost, with some possible reimbursement of a portion of the cost from SCVWD if the fence is in disrepair.  Provide grade-separated crossings and/or enhanced at-grade pedestrian crossing treatments at the major street crossings.  Construct trail on west side of Don Burnett Bridge to remain clear of residential properties 286  Consider limited trail access and/or providing permit parking in the Lucille Avenue neighborhood In addition to community outreach and engagement, a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consisting of representatives of Cal Water, Caltrans, the City of Sunnyvale, PG&E, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the Santa Clara County Valley Transit Authority (VTA) was created in order to give these utility companies and public agencies an opportunity to identify impacts and concerns related to their specific property interest in the trail alignment and to assist in the decision making. During the feasibility study process, staff and the consultant team held two meetings with all TAC members, and supplemental individual meetings with some TAC members were held to gather more specific information where appropriate. When the project moves forward in the design phase, staff will work closely with all affected residents, utility companies, public agencies, and other affected stakeholders, to ensure that all stakeholder concerns are addressed to the extent possible. Sustainability Impact Construction of the Junipero Serra Trail will encourage bicycling, reduce reliance on the single-occupancy vehicle, and will therefore have a positive impact on sustainability. The trail is consistent with General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040 Policy M-1.3: Regional Trail Development, Policy M-2.3: Connectivity, and Policy M-5.3: Connections to Trails. With the inclusion of mitigation measures, to be determined during future environmental review, impacts of the proposed trail are likely not to be significant. A full environmental assessment will be performed during the design phase of the project. Fiscal Impact This feasibility study was completed with a contribution from Apple, Inc. in the amount of $250,000. There is no immediate fiscal impact resulting from the approval and adoption of the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study. Costs to design, perform environmental analysis, and construct the trail depend heavily upon which of several alternatives are chosen within each of the trail segments. The most significant of these choices are (1) whether to enclose the channel within a new concrete box culvert between the Don Burnett Bridge and Wolfe Road in order to accommodate a wider trail; and (2) whether to pursue an enhanced at-grade crossing, a grade-separated bridge, or a grade-separated tunnel at the De Anza Boulevard crossing. Cost estimates for these alternatives are presented in the Table s below. For the option that does not construct a concrete box culvert, but leaves the existing concrete channel 287 in place (note that within Segment 2, only one of the De Anza Boulevard crossing alternatives would be selected): Costs, $M Engineering Construction Total Segment 1 0.5 3.0 3.5 Segment 2 De Anza At-grade De Anza Bridge De Anza Tunnel 0.5 1.9 2.6 3.5 15.7 22.2 4.0 17.6 24.8 Segment 3 0.3 1.5 1.8 For the alternative that constructs a concrete box culvert between the Don Burnett Bridge and Wolfe Road: Costs, $M Engineering Construction Total Segment 1 1.5 9.6 11.1 Segment 2 De Anza At-grade De Anza Bridge De Anza Tunnel 2.5 3.8 4.6 16.3 28.6 35.1 18.5 32.4 39.5 Segment 3 0.3 1.5 1.8 Staff is not requesting a budget appropriation at this time to proceed with the project. Staff anticipates including the engineering design and environmental clearance of one or more segments of the Junipero Serra Trail within the 2019/20 Capital Improvement Program budget request, to be presented to Council later this year. At that time, the project will be included within the context of other prioritized capital projects for discussion and potential funding. As this project would provide connectivity between several Apple campuses, staff will share details of the various segments with Apple to determine not only their preferences but also what funding they can contribute to the project. Bicycle Pedestrian Commission The Draft Junipero Serra Feasibility Study was presented to the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission at their regularly scheduled meeting of December 19, 2 018. At the meeting the Commission, with Lyn dissenting, voted 4-1 to endorse the trail alternative that 288 does not construct a concrete box culvert in place of the existing drainage channel and which enhances the existing at-grade crossing at De Anza Boulevard rather than construct a grade-separated crossing. _____________________________________ Prepared by: David Stillman, Transportation Manager Reviewed by: Roger Lee, Acting Director of Public Works Approved for Submission by: Timm Borden, Acting City Manager Attachments: A – Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study B – Draft Resolution 289 December 14, 2018 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 290 291 Introduction Planning Process Trail Alignment Summary Recommendations Acknowledgments Appendix Executive Summary Figures 2 3 4 6 5 1 Background & Project Purpose Local & Regional Policies Project Goals & Objectives Existing Conditions Stakeholder and Agency Coordination Trail Criteria and Standards Community Outreach Alternatives Evaluation & Preferred Alternative Segment 1 - Mary Ave to De Anza Boulevard Segment 2 - De Anza Boulevard to Vallco Segment 3 - Vallco to Vallco Parkway Safety, Privacy, and Security 5 6 7 9 22 30 34 1 5 9 39 85 91 92 39 49 57 75 81 Table of Contents 292 293 2-1 2-2 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 3-7 3-8 3-9 3-10 3-11 3-12 3-13 3-14 3-15 3-16 3-17 3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24 3-25 5 7 9 9 10 10 11 12 12 13 13 13 14 15 17 19 22 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 26 27 33 Don Burnett Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Cupertino Loop Trail Existing Conditions – Less than 14’ Existing Conditions – 14’ or More PG&E Utility Poles in SCVWD Corridor Overall Site Map Bike Lanes on Stelling Road Don Burnett Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Trailhead Existing Conditions at Stelling Road Existing De Anza Boulevard Crossing Existing Conditions along Lucille Avenue Existing Conditions below Blaney Avenue Underpass at Wolfe Road Site Analysis – Segment 1 Site Analysis – Segment 2 Site Analysis - Segment 3 Vallco Parkway Potential Trailhead CalWater Facility Fence De Anza Boulevard On-Ramp Loc-N-Stor Fence on Right Hyatt Hotel House Under Construction Lock It Up Self Storage Fence PG&E Tower Public Storage Wall and SCVWD Corridor Fence Straddling SCVWD Corridor and Residents Vallco Mall Sign CalTrans Two-Way Class 1 Bikeway Figures 294 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 4-11 4-12 4-13 4-14 4-15 4-16 4-17 4-18 4-19 4-20 4-21 4-22 4-23 4-24 Pedestrian Trail, Less than 14’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Min. 14’ Wide, Covered Channel Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Min. 14’ Wide, On-Grade Public Storage Sections Alternative Alignment Plan – Segment 1 Alternative Alignment Plan – Segment 2 Alternative Alignment Plan – Segment 3 Mary Avenue Enlargement East Option Mary Avenue Enlargement West Option Mary Avenue Sections High Visibility Crosswalk Example Grade-Separated Under-Crossing under Stelling Road Existing Conditions under Stelling Road Stelling Road Intersection Enlargement Under-Crossing Example Stevens Creek Trail Tunnel Example 1 Stevens Creek Trail Tunnel Example 2 Tunnel Finishes Tunnel Visual Simulation 1 Tunnel Visual Simulation 2 De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement – Tunnel Under-Crossing Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Visual Simulation 1 Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Visual Simulation 2 De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement – Bridge Over-Crossing 40 40 40 41 43 45 47 50 51 52 53 54 54 55 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 62 62 63 295 4-25 4-26 4-27 4-28 4-29 4-30 4-31 4-32 4-33 4-34 4-35 4-36 4-37 4-38 4-39 4-40 4-41 4-42 High Visibility Crosswalk Example De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement – At-Grade Crossing – Alternative #2 Pinch Point between Sound Wall and Guard Rail Lucille Avenue Sections Blaney Avenue Trail Access Enlargement North Portal Avenue Trail Access Enlargement Hyatt House Hotel Enlargement Apple Campus Sections Calabazas Creek Sections Privacy/Security Fence Example Split Rail Fence Example Under-Crossing Barrier Example Guard Rail Example Fencing Example Rendering – Before Fencing Example Rendering – After Trail Patrol Security Camera Milestone Marker 65 67 69 70 71 73 77 79 80 81 81 81 82 82 82 83 83 83 296 297 Executive Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 1Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Executive Summary 1 1 The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Junipero Serra Trail is a feasible project for the City of Cupertino. The City anticipates the report will serve as a springboard for further detailed study and identification of project funding, if the trail is deemed feasible. The trail was first identified and approved in the City’s 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan and further supplemented in the City’s 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan. The Junipero Serra Trail is envisioned to be one segment of a larger community wide “Loop” of on and off-street bicycle facilities. Through an extensive public outreach process, it became clear the community has a variety of opinions on the merits of a trail at this location, with many supporting the trail and others not. In addition, community members indicated preferences for easy trail access, grade separated street crossings, neighbor privacy, and security. These and other factors discussed in this report are important considerations to carry forward in the development of this trail. The resulting feasibility study provides a narrative and graphic road map to guide further detailed study of the trail’s development. Based on community input, City goals for trail development, and input from key agency stakeholders, trail alignment alternative #2 is the preferred alternative. Alternative #2 converts the Junipero Serra Channel between the Don Burnett Bicycle- Pedestrian Bridge and Wolfe Road into a box culvert and allows the trail to be located over the top of the culvert. The Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) preliminarily agreed to alternative #2 under the condition the City accepts all right of way and maintenance of the channel as part of the City storm drain system prior to any construction improvements. Final approval would be subject to approval from SCVWD’s Board of Directors. Other trail development considerations are presented along the alignment and are discussed as to their feasibility and costs of implementation. The study also addresses community concerns surrounding safety and privacy by suggesting various measures including fence options, police patrols, security cameras and increasing the number of access points as much as possible. Detailed cost estimates are provided for each trail alternative, as well as costs for standalone items such as the grade-separated crossings at Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. 298 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study2Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility StudyExecutive Summary2 Top Image: Callander Associate’s Staff talking to a community member at a community meeting Middle Image: Santa Clara Valley Water District corridor existing conditions Bottom Image: Visual Simulation of a Bridge Over- Crossing for De Anza Boulevard 299 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 3Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Executive Summary 3 This report summarizes the feasibility study process and contains the following sections: Introduction Provides a brief overview of the project purpose, background, goals and objectives, as well as project alignment with local and regional trail policies. Planning Process Provides an overview of the planning process including an assessment of existing site conditions along the alignment, ranging from typical corridor conditions, adjacent land uses, relationship to nearby facilities and existing roadway crossings; trail development opportunities and challenges; and the community outreach process with details from each event and input received. Trail Alignments Provides an in-depth evaluation of each alignment alternative including design considerations, trail access points, roadway crossings, safety and security measures and other site-specific challenges. Summary Recommendations Provides a summary of the recommended trail alternatives to further pursue. Appendix Includes meeting summaries, technical documents, outreach materials, input results, detailed cost estimates, and other supplemental project information for reference. 300 301 Introduction Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 5Introduction 2 Background & Project Purpose This feasibility study evaluates the potential for development of the Junipero Serra Trail identified in the City of Cupertino’s 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan and 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan. If implemented, the trail would create an important east west off-street trail across the heart of the City providing recreational opportunities, commuter options, safe routes to school, and an off-street alternative for bicycle trips. This planning effort was commissioned by the City in the summer of 2017 with the purpose of developing a feasibility study for the trail. As part of the study, a comprehensive public outreach process was initiated to better understand community concerns and desires for the project. The study aims to identify challenges, opportunities, and estimated costs associated with implementation of the 2.91-mile trail. This trail segment represents the northern reach of the “Cupertino Loop”, identified in the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan. The Junipero Serra Trail is one of three trail segments being studied as part of the Loop. The proposed alignment falls almost entirely within Santa Clara Valley Water District right- of-way and utilizes the existing maintenance road that follows the Junipero Serra Channel on the south side of Interstate 280 from Mary Avenue at the western extent to the intersection of Calabazas Creek and Vallco Parkway at the eastern extent. See Figure 2-2. A number of street crossings are required within the alignment including Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard, and Wolfe Road. If completed, the trail would provide connections to other on-street facilities, the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge, residential neighborhoods, schools, retail centers, and employment hubs. Figure 2-1Don Burnett Bike-Pedestrian Bridge 302 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study6Introduction Local & Regional Policies The Junipero Serra Trail project is consistent with a number of local and regional policies relative to trail development. 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, City of Cupertino “The City of Cupertino envisions an exceptional bicycling environment that supports active living and healthy transportation choices, provides for safer bicycling, and enables people of all ages and abilities to access jobs, school, recreation, shopping, and transit on a bicycle as a part of daily life.” - Vision Statement from the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan The 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan recommends implementation of a loop trail around central Cupertino. The loop would be accomplished by implementing Class I trails along Regnart Creek, along the Interstate 280 Junipero Serra Channel (Junipero Serra Trail) and along the Union Pacific Railroad corridor. These trail segments would be connected to each other by on-street bikeways. See Figure 2-2. 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan, City of Cupertino The 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan outlines goals to improve pedestrian safety, access, and connectivity within the City. The Junipero Serra Trail is identified as a Tier 1 project within the 2018 Pedestrian Plan. The trail will supplement the extensive pedestrian network the City is aiming for and supports all of the plan’s goals. General Plan – Community Vision 2040, City of Cupertino The City of Cupertino General Plan – Community Vision 2040 contains twelve guiding principles that encompass a broad range of community aspirations. The following guiding principles are consistent with the trail being considered along Interstate 280: #3 Improve Connectivity: Create a well- connected and safe system of trails, pedestrian and bicycle paths and create access to interesting routes to different destinations. #4 Enhance Mobility: Ensure the efficient and safe movement of pedestrians and bicyclists to fully accommodate Cupertino’s residents, workers, visitors and students of all ages and abilities. Pedestrian and bike paths should comprise of an integrated system of fully connected and interesting routes to all destinations. Goal M-3 in the City’s General Plan says, “Support a safe pedestrian and bicycle street network for people of all ages and abilities”. Further policies within goal M-3 encourage adoption of bicycle and pedestrian master plans along with encouragement of pedestrian and bicycle crossings at physical barriers. Policy LU-2.1: Gateways identifies the De Anza Boulevard and Interstate 280 on/off ramp intersection as a potential gateway location into the City of Cupertino. Future design for the trail crossing at this intersection may consider incorporating a “gateway” design feature. Countywide Bicycle Plan, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority The Countywide Bicycle Plan identifies the Junipero Serra Trail as a Cross-County Bicycle Corridor (CCBC). District 4 Bike Plan, Caltrans The District 4 Bike Plan identifies policies, strategies and actions for Caltrans and partner agencies to improve the safety and comfort of pedestrians and bicyclists. The Junipero Serra Trail is identified as a “Top Tier” priority project for Santa Clara County. 303 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 7Introduction Project Goals & Objectives 1. Form a clear understanding of the project area, including adjoining neighborhoods, businesses, and community services, and align with other City plans that impact the study area. 2. Have an inclusive community outreach process and encourage participation and input throughout all phases of the study. 3. Identify if the trail is feasible (in entirety or in segments) and provide reasoning for these findings to support future City of Cupertino trail projects. I-280 85 85 I-280 Junipero Serra Trail Figure 2-2Cupertino Loop Trail 304 305 Planning Process Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 9Planning Process 3 Existing Conditions The proposed trail alignment runs east-west across the northern part of Cupertino, just south of Interstate 280. The SCVWD currently owns and maintains the right-of-way which contains the Junipero Serra Channel and maintenance road being considered for trail development. The channel was originally designed and constructed by Caltrans to intercept drainage on the south side of Interstate 280 when the freeway was built. The right-of-way varies in width from 27’-0” to 140’-0” and the maintenance road is unpaved and also varies in width from 7’-6” to at least 15’-0” within the project limits. The Junipero Serra Channel generally has a trapezoidal structure and is concrete lined for much of the corridor. Where the channel encounters roadway crossings, the channel extends beneath the street via reinforced concrete pipe culverts. East of Wolfe Road, the channel is unlined until the confluence with Calabazas Creek. Figure 3-2Existing Conditions - 14’ or More Existing Conditions - Less than 14’ Figure 3-1 CHANNEL LESS THAN 14’-0” SCVWD CHANNEL 14’-0” OR MORE SCVWD 306 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study10Planning Process Figure 3-4Overall Site Map Trail Segment Transition Trailhead Opportunity Street Crossing Mary Ave Trailhead Lucille Ave Trailhead Calabazas Creek Trailhead North Portal Ave Trailhead The corridor is currently access controlled and has a combination of chain link fence, wood fence, locked gates and freeway sound walls enclosing the perimeter. Overhead PG&E transmission and distribution lines are located within or immediately adjacent to the corridor starting at the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge and extending to Blaney Avenue. For purposes of studying feasibility, the trail was divided into 3 segments. Segment 1 starts at Mary Avenue near the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge approach, heads eastward along Interstate 280, across Stelling Road, and terminates just west of De Anza Boulevard. Segment 2 includes the De Anza Boulevard intersection, Blaney Avenue, and terminates just east of the CalWater facility at North Portal Avenue. Segment 3 extends east of the CalWater facility, past Vallco and Wolfe Road to the confluence of the Junipero Serra Channel and Calabazas Creek. The trail then turns south along the west bank of Calabazas Creek and terminates at Vallco Parkway. See Figures 3-4 and 3-12 through 3-14. Figure 3-3PG&E Utility Poles in SCVWD Corridor 307 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 11Planning Process Land Use The proposed trail spans a variety of adjacent land uses. Between Mary Avenue and Stelling Road, the trail is adjacent to single family residences. Between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard, land uses include multi- family residences and general commercial/ light industrial. Between De Anza Boulevard and Blaney Avenue, land uses vary and include single family residences, general commercial/ office and multi-family residences. Between Blaney Avenue and Wolfe Road, land uses include single family, residential duplex and regional shopping. Finally, between Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway, land uses include regional shopping and the “Heart of the City” Specific Plan Area. See Figures 3-12 through 3-14 showing the different land uses near the proposed trail area. Existing Bicycle / Pedestrian Facilities There are a number of existing bike and pedestrian facilities that would have direct connections to the Junipero Serra Trail including; • Mary Avenue: Class II bike lanes in both directions • Don Burnett Bike-Pedestrian Bridge: Class 1 bike path over Interstate 280 • Stelling Road: Class II bike lanes in both direction • De Anza Boulevard: Class II bike lanes in both directions • Blaney Avenue: Class II bike lanes in both directions • Wolfe Road: Class IV separated bike lanes planned as part of Interstate 280/ Wolfe Road interchange improvements • Vallco Parkway: Class II bike lanes in both directions The proposed trail’s proximity to existing bike infrastructure will improve connectivity across the City, particularly for east to west travel. See Figures 3-12 through 3-14 to see the existing bicycle facilities relative to the proposed trail. Nearby Facilities The area surrounding the Junipero Serra Trail alignment includes schools, residential neighborhoods, commercial, retail, hotels and major employment centers. The addition of a trail would provide an off-street link between these various uses. Below is a list of adjacent facilities along with their travel distance from the trail: Schools • Garden Gate Elementary School – 0.5 miles • Homestead High School – 0.4 miles • Lawson Middle School – 0.4 miles Commercial/Retail/Hotels • Vallco – direct connection to trail • Hyatt House – direct connection to trail • Courtyard by Marriot –0.5 miles • Hilton Garden Inn – 0.5 miles • Heart of the City Specific Plan Area – direct connection to trail Employment • Apple – direct connection to the trail at two locations, within 0.5 mile to other nearby campuses including Apple Park • Other various employers Figure 3-5Bike Lanes on Stelling Road 308 Figure 3-6 Figure 3-7 Don Burnett Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Trailhead Existing Conditions at Stelling Road Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study12Planning Process Roadway Crossings Much of the trail alignment runs through residential, commercial and retail areas as described in the Land Use section. The trail alignment encounters multiple roadways within the project limits: Mary Avenue, Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard, Lucille Avenue, Blaney Avenue, Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway. Mary Avenue Mary Avenue is a two-lane road with a speed limit of 35 mph. It runs north and south between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Meteor Drive, continuing north of Interstate 280 at Homestead Road into the Sunnyvale city limits. The existing Don Burnett Bike- Pedestrian Bridge spans over Interstate 280 to connect these two segments of Mary Avenue with a Class I bike path. The trailhead at Meteor Drive also serves as the western extent of the Junipero Serra Trail. The section of Mary Avenue closest to the trailhead is surrounded mostly by single family and multi- family residential as well as a City corporation yard and storage facility. See Figure 3-6. Stelling Road Stelling Road runs north and south between Homestead Road and Prospect Road. It is a two-lane collector road with a speed limit of 30 mph and crosses Interstate 280 with an overcrossing bridge. Stelling Road intersects the Junipero Serra Channel and is one of the major crossings for the Junipero Serra Trail. This portion of Stelling Road is located within residential neighborhoods of single-family residences to the west and apartments to the east. Stelling Road currently has class II bike lanes in both directions and there is no existing crosswalk where the trail would cross Stelling Road. The trail’s intersection with Stelling Road will need careful consideration as an at-grade crossing would represent a new mid-block crossing. Sightlines, traffic volumes and speed are all factors in designing for a mid- block crossing at this location. See Figure 3-7. 309 Figure 3-8 Figure 3-10 Figure 3-9 Existing De Anza Boulevard Crossing Existing Conditions below Blaney Avenue Existing Conditions along Lucille Avenue Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 13Planning Process De Anza Boulevard De Anza Boulevard is an arterial with a speed limit of 35 mph that runs north and south between Homestead Road and Prospect Road. De Anza Boulevard intersects the Junipero Serra Channel and is another major crossing for the Junipero Serra Trail. The street at this location has five northbound through lanes and one right turn lane and four southbound lanes. There is an existing crosswalk across De Anza Boulevard just south of the on and off ramps to southbound Interstate 280 with a pedestrian refuge island at the landscape median. The trail’s intersection with De Anza Boulevard will require considerable attention as there are numerous constraints affecting any crossing alternative under consideration. A bike- pedestrian bridge is constrained by overhead utilities, while a tunnel is constrained by underground utilities. An at-grade crossing has impacts to traffic operations. Each of these alternatives are discussed in greater detail later in this report. See Figure 3-8. Lucille Avenue Lucille Avenue is a two-lane road with a speed limit of 25 mph, running east and west from approximately Larry Way to North Blaney Avenue. This section of roadway parallels the trail corridor and provides opportunities for trail access and visibility. See Figure 3-9. Blaney Avenue Blaney Avenue crosses over Lucille Avenue and Interstate 280 with a bridge and does not intersect with the trail alignment. However, there is a separate section of Blaney Avenue separate from the overcrossing that connects to Lucille Avenue at a sharp 90-degree bend just east of the overcrossing bridge. A trail access opportunity is possible at this location as well. See Figure 3-10. 310 Figure 3-11Underpass at Wolfe Road Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study14Planning Process Wolfe Road Wolfe Road runs north and south between Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard, bisecting the Vallco property. Wolfe Road crosses over Perimeter Road near the on and off ramps to Interstate 280. The proposed trail is anticipated to utilize the existing Perimeter Road undercrossing beneath Wolfe Road. Additionally, plans are in development for a new interchange at Interstate 280 and Wolfe Road. Preliminary plans make provisions for trail connections from the sidewalks on Wolfe Road to the proposed trail. See Figure 3-11. Vallco Parkway Vallco Parkway runs east and west between Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue and has class II bike lanes in both directions. Vallco Parkway is a four-lane road with a speed limit of 30 mph. The trail is planned to terminate at Vallco Parkway on the west bank of Calabazas Creek, which presents an opportunity for a trailhead. However, careful consideration is needed at this location as the trail does not end at a signalized intersection. Site Analysis Plan The process for developing the feasibility study included an extensive evaluation of existing conditions and criteria as previously described. A Site Analysis Plan was prepared that synthesizes the existing conditions into an exhibit that can be used to analyze opportunities and challenges, at a corridor- wide scale. Preliminary steps included gathering base data, conducting a detailed site reconnaissance, and reviewing easements, utilities, and property ownership. The City’s geographic information system (GIS) files were used to develop base mapping including parcel identification, streets, sidewalks, tree canopies, structures, utilities, contours, and other pertinent information. The consultant team and City staff walked the full length of the trail to photograph existing conditions and make observations relevant to trail development. A critical component of the site reconnaissance was to identify available width for a trail. During the field walk, width measurements were taken of the existing maintenance road throughout the corridor. Because a class I multi-use trail is desired to meet the goals of the City’s bicycle and pedestrian policies, a minimum 14’-0” overall trail width would be required. Generally, most of the maintenance road within the limits of the project is less than 14’-0” wide. In some pinch point locations, the maintenance road narrows to approximately 7’-6” wide. The section between Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway is the only exception and provided widths in excess of 14’-0”. The variation in maintenance road width is depicted on the Site Analysis Plan. See Figures 3-1 and 3-2 for graphics showing the width of the corridor. Using the base map and site observations, a Site Analysis Plan was prepared. The plan identified the existing maintenance road widths, City limits, utilities, potential trail access locations, adjacent land uses, schools, major retail centers, major employers, existing on- street facilities, among other existing features. See Figures 3-12 through 3-14. Additionally, cross sections and existing conditions were generated to better understand various trail configurations. See Figure 4-4, 4-10, 4-28, 4-32, and 4-33. 311 Planning ProcessJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 15 Available Width, less than 14’-0” (does not meet class 1 multi-use standards) City Limits Available Width, 14’-0” minimum (meets class 1 multi-use standards) Trail Connection Point Existing Conditions Land Uses Near Proposed Trail Area Heart of the City Specific Plan Area Public Building (BA) Quasi-Public Building (BQ) / Mini Stor General Commercial (CG) Office/Planned Office (OA/OP) Residential Duplex (R2) / Mini-Stor Agricultural Residential (A1) Regional Shopping / Hotel HE Priority Housing Sites (Housing Element) *residential zoning is not shown Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike Route Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Overhead Utilities Gateway Class 1 Bike Path Light Industrial (ML) / Planned Industrial Zone (MP) 0 50 100 200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (BA) (CG, ML) (BA) (BQ, Mini- Stor) (BA) (BQ) HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL GARDEN GATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Don Burnett Bike-Pedestrian Bridge MARY AVENUESTELLING ROADI-280 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Figure 3-12Site Analysis - Segment 1 312 Planning Process Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study16 this page intentionally left blank 313 Planning ProcessJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 17 (CG, ML, OA)(BQ) (R2, Mini-Stor) (A1) (BQ) APPLE LAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL BLANEY AVENUEDE ANZA BOULEVARDI-280 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0 50 100 200Available Width, less than 14’-0” (does not meet class 1 multi-use standards) City Limits Available Width, 14’-0” minimum (meets class 1 multi-use standards) Trail Connection Point Existing Conditions Land Uses Near Proposed Trail Area Heart of the City Specific Plan Area Public Building (BA) Quasi-Public Building (BQ) / Mini Stor General Commercial (CG) Office/Planned Office (OA/OP) Residential Duplex (R2) / Mini-Stor Agricultural Residential (A1) Regional Shopping / Hotel HE Priority Housing Sites (Housing Element) *residential zoning is not shown Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike Route Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Overhead Utilities Gateway Class 1 Bike Path Light Industrial (ML) / Planned Industrial Zone (MP) Figure 3-13Site Analysis - Segment 2 314 Planning Process Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study18 this page intentionally left blank 315 Planning ProcessJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 HE HE (Regional Shopping) (Heart of the City Specific Plan Area) HE Enlargement Area - Hyatt House Hotel Bike/ Ped Path Connection (Hotel) HYATT HOUSE HOTEL - CUPERTINO, CA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - AUGUST 13, 2014AADROP-OFF / ENTRY PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OUTDOOR DINING POOL EXISTING TREE SHADE TREE FLOWERING / SEASONAL TREE IN GRATE UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREE STREET TREE IN GRATE PUBLIC ART DECORATIVE PAVING BANDS (GRAVEL OR CONCRETE) PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK TRASH/RECYCLING BIN STORMWATER PLANTING ADA ACCESSAIBLE RAMP SCREENED TRANSFORMER LEGEND NORTH SCALE:1” = 20’-0” L-1 12 12 13 13 8 1 3 4 6 7 2 2 2 7 7 10 11 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 16 15 14 13 8 0’ 5’20’10’10’ proposed class IV separated bike lane as part of I-280/Wolfe Road interchange improvements Green-backed bike lanes along N Tantau Ave. and Vallco Pkwy. See enlargement area connection to proposed trail hotel bicycle/ pedestrian path CALABAZAS CREEKN TANTAU AVENUE VALL C O P A R K W A YN WO L F E ROAD I-280 Vallco marquee sign P(MP) APPLE 33 32 31 30292827 2625 24 23 0 50 100 200 Available Width, less than 14’-0” (does not meet class 1 multi-use standards) City Limits Available Width, 14’-0” minimum (meets class 1 multi-use standards) Trail Connection Point Existing Conditions Land Uses Near Proposed Trail Area Heart of the City Specific Plan Area Public Building (BA) Quasi-Public Building (BQ) / Mini Stor General Commercial (CG) Office/Planned Office (OA/OP) Residential Duplex (R2) / Mini-Stor Agricultural Residential (A1) Regional Shopping / Hotel HE Priority Housing Sites (Housing Element) *residential zoning is not shown Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike Route Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Overhead Utilities Gateway Class 1 Bike Path Light Industrial (ML) / Planned Industrial Zone (MP) Figure 3-14Site Analysis -Segment 3 316 Planning Process Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study20 this page intentionally left blank 317 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 21Planning Process Below is a summary of the opportunities and constraints identified during site analysis. Opportunities 1. Suitable overall width of corridor for trail 2. Connections to existing on-street facilities at Mary Avenue, Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard, Blaney Avenue, Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway 3. Corridor owned by single agency Constraints 1. Utilities below grade and overhead throughout corridor 2. PG&E easement restrictions with regard to placement of structures at De Anza Boulevard 3. Narrow maintenance road in much of the corridor 4. Difficult grade separated crossings at Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard 318 Vallco Parkway Potential Trailhead Figure 3-15 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study22Planning Process Stakeholder and Agency Coordination Stakeholders With any project, there are numerous agencies, utility companies and property owners directly or indirectly affected by the proposed improvements. This is especially true with trail projects, due to their linear nature. Trails interface with more stakeholders than just about any other project type. The Junipero Serra Trail is similar in that regard. Below is a list of adjacent stakeholders along with preliminary opportunities and challenges for each. Specific design considerations pertaining to each stakeholder are discussed further in Chapter 4. Stakeholders are listed in alphabetical order. Apple To date, the City has had informal conversations with Apple regarding the trail project. Apple has expressed interest in the project as the trail would provide an off-street trail connection between their various campuses in Cupertino. Should the trail project advance into the design phase, further coordination will be needed to better understand Apple’s needs and to ensure the community’s concerns about Apple’s impacts on the trail are met. Primary topics to be coordinated further with Apple include: Trail Access The proposed trail alignment passes directly adjacent to Apple’s Infinite Loop and Vallco Parkway campuses. Employees using the trail would have quick access to restaurants, retail and other Apple campuses. Security and access control would need to be addressed in the design. Fencing at the Apple campuses may need to be upgraded in terms of height and durability for security needs. Property Impacts De Anza Boulevard Tunnel Option The proposed stairs shown in the tunnel option under De Anza Boulevard encroach into Apple’s property. If this option is selected, an easement or property acquisition would be required. The bridge option would not require an encroachment into Apple’s property. Further discussion about the tunnel and bridge options follow in Chapter 4. Vallco Parkway Trail Head The proposed trail terminates near Calabazas Creek at Vallco Parkway midblock between two signalized intersections. The most ideal trailhead in this area would be at the northeast corner of the Vallco Parkway and Main Street Driveway signalized intersection. To better facilitate bicycle and pedestrian movement at this corner, an easement within Apple property may be necessary. See Figure 3-15. 319 CalWater Facility Fence Figure 3-16 Figure 3-17De Anza Boulevard On-Ramp Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 23Planning Process CalWater CalWater has underground facilities in and around the proposed trail alignment which need to be considered in the trail design process. There are several CalWater lines that cross the trail alignment: • Stelling Road – 6” and 18” water lines • De Anza Boulevard – 8” water line • East edge of Apple Infinite Loop – 8” water line • Blaney Avenue – 6” water line • Western extent of Vallco – 12” line • Interstate 280 off-ramp at Wolfe Road – 12” water line One of CalWater’s facilities is an underground water tank and service yard at the north end of North Portal Avenue. This facility serves a large portion of Cupertino’s water needs. The CalWater service yard also provides an opportunity for an additional trail access point. Trail users would access the trail from North Portal Avenue, following CalWater’s driveway and the southern portion of the service yard to create a straight path to the trail. CalWater would need to grant a trail easement to the City of Cupertino for the trail connection on their property, and access control security would need to be addressed. Public trail access through the North Portal Avenue facility’s driveway was preliminarily discussed with CalWater and would require further coordination with them. A draft concept was prepared to illustrate how access to the trail could be addressed, while maintaining security and access control. This is further discussed in Chapter 4. See Figure 3-16. Caltrans The proposed trail runs along the south side of Interstate 280. While much of the trail would remain outside of Caltrans right-of-way, there are two locations where the trail is proposed to encroach: • Stelling Road: Due to constraints with the at-grade crossing, a grade- separated undercrossing is proposed within the embankment along Interstate 280. • De Anza Boulevard: A bike-pedestrian bridge over De Anza Boulevard may require encroachment into Caltrans right-of-way. Preliminary concepts have been shared with Caltrans depicting these improvements and are further discussed in Chapter 4. Additionally, Caltrans has reserved ingress- egress rights through SCVWD’s corridor and will need to review the plan development process to confirm their access needs are met. See Figure 3-17. 320 Loc -N-Stor Fence on Right Hyatt Hotel House Under Construction Lock It Up Self Storage Fence Figure 3-18 Figure 3-19 Figure 3-20 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study24Planning Process City of Sunnyvale At two locations, the proposed trail passes through the City of Sunnyvale’s City limits: 1. Between Mary Avenue and Stelling Road behind single family residential homes, encompassing approximately 330 feet of the trail 2. Directly north of North Portal Avenue and in an undeveloped, triangular shaped parcel, encompassing approximately 360 feet of the trail. Any trail development would need to be coordinated with the City of Sunnyvale, especially as it pertains to trail maintenance, plan approvals, and cost sharing if applicable. Cupertino Loc-N-Stor Cupertino Loc-N-Stor is a storage facility located at 10655 Mary Avenue, at the western extent of the proposed trail, near the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge. Two trail access alternatives have been prepared showing how trail users would get from Mary Avenue to the proposed trail. One alternative shows the path immediately adjacent to Cupertino Loc-N-Stor’s facility, within the existing slope easement. Additional coordination during the design phase will be required to address concerns related to security and privacy along this edge. Cupertino Loc-N-Stor is currently considering upgrades to their facility and any improvements made should not preclude trail development. See Figure 3-18. Hyatt House Hotel Currently under construction, the Hyatt House Hotel located on Perimeter Road just east of Wolfe Road and near Vallco, is scheduled to be finished by early 2019. In anticipation of the Junipero Serra Trail being constructed in the future, the hotel project is constructing a 10’ wide trail on the west side of the property that connects to the sidewalk undercrossing on Perimeter Road and the SCVWD property to the north. See Figure 3-19. Lock It Up Self Storage The Lock It Up Self Storage facility is located, at 10730 North Blaney, along the proposed trail immediately east of North Blaney Avenue. The back wall of the storage units faces the proposed trail. Security, access control and vandalism will need to be considered in concert with the property owner during the design phase. See Figure 3-20. 321 PG&E Tower Figure 3-21 Public Storage Wall and SCVWD Corridor Figure 3-22 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 25Planning Process PG&E PG&E has numerous facilities throughout the project. Most notably, high voltage overhead transmission lines and lower voltage distribution lines run adjacent to or directly above the proposed trail from the western extent at Mary Avenue to just east of Blaney Avenue, where the overhead lines traverse to the north side of Interstate 280. See Figure 3-21. PG&E easements are located within and immediately adjacent to the corridor. At De Anza Boulevard, the PG&E easement is within SCVWD property where a potential bridge or tunnel crossing would be located. The easement language prohibits structures within the easement taller than 15’-0”. Additionally, CPUC General Order 95 mandates clearances between structures and wires. For these wires, 12’-0” vertical and 6’- 0” horizontal clearance is required, pending final confirmation from PG&E. Detailed plan enlargements were prepared at Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard to show how trail improvements avoid or impact PG&E electrical facilities. At Stelling Road, overhead and underground PG&E facilities cross the proposed trail. Overhead lines run north and south along Stelling Road as well as east and west along the trail alignment. Underground gas lines are also present in Stelling Road. The PG&E easement on both sides of De Anza Boulevard is currently being mapped to better understand the location and width of the easement. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the easement and potential infeasibility of a bridge or tunnel, an at-grade crossing option has also been evaluated and is discussed further in Chapter 4. There are also underground utilities (electrical and gas) that would impact in the tunnel option under De Anza Boulevard. On-going coordination will be required with PG&E to determine the best overall means of achieving street crossings near their facilities. Public Storage Public Storage is located at, 20565 Valley Green Drive, west of De Anza Boulevard. The back wall of the storage units faces the proposed trail. Security, access control and vandalism will need to be considered with the property owner during the design phase. Public Storage is currently considering upgrades to their facility and any improvements made would not preclude trail development. See Figure 3-22. 322 Fence Straddling SCVWD Corridor and Residences Figure 3-23 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study26Planning Process Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) The proposed trail alignment alternatives lie almost entirely within SCVWD property. Currently, SCVWD manages and maintains the Junipero Serra Channel in the corridor. Occasional maintenance activities are required to clear the channel of debris and provide general upkeep of the facilities. SCVWD is most concerned with maintaining sufficient access after trail development occurs. Concept plans have been shared with the SCVWD for review and comment. Alternative #1 proposes constructing a trail over the existing maintenance road with a guard rail placed between the maintenance road and the open channel. In reviewing trail alternatives, the SCVWD indicated that guardrails at the edge of the open channel would not be acceptable. Reasons for opposing a guardrail include narrowing of the existing maintenance road and limited channel access for maintenance operations. Due to the SCVWD’s position on guardrails, alternative #1 is not feasible as currently envisioned in this study. Without a guardrail, the steep drop-off adjacent to the trail would be hazardous and therefore cannot be recommended. For this reason, guard rails are still shown in all alternative #1 graphics. If alternative #1 is selected for further study, an alternative edge treatment will need to be vetted with the SCVWD. A potential solution may include constructing a wider maintenance road with removable guardrail. There would be additional capital costs, design effort and time associated with mitigating these concerns. Alternative #2 involves converting the Junipero Serra Channel into an underground box culvert. SCVWD staff has preliminarily agreed to alternative #2 on the condition that the City of Cupertino assume full ownership and maintenance of the Junipero Serra Channel as part of the City’s storm drain system prior to any modifications being implemented. The transfer of the District’s right of way and Junipero Serra Channel to the City is subject to prior approval by the District’s Board of Directors. Additionally, regulatory approval may be required by the US Army Corps of Engineers, California State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) VTA has an interest in many modes of transportation including trail development as planned from a regional perspective. This project is consistent with their goals and policies for Cross County Bicycle Corridors (CCBC) and is shown on their 2018 Countywide Bicycle Plan. VTA is also managing the Interstate 280 and Wolfe Road Interchange project. Preliminary alternatives have been prepared for the interchange project, each of which depict connections from sidewalk facilities to the future Junipero Serra Trail. Single-Family Residential A large portion of the proposed trail is abutted by single-family residences. Through multiple community meetings and events, a number of comments and concerns have been raised by this critical stakeholder group. The most common concerns revolved around safety and security of having a trail directly behind their homes. A number of measures have been suggested to help mitigate these concerns and are described in more depth in Chapter 4. Detailed community input can be found in Chapter 3 and the Appendix. See Figure 3-23. 323 Vallco Mall Sign Figure 3-24 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 27Planning Process Vallco Shopping Mall The Vallco Special Area consists of approximately 70 acres under the ownership of three different entities: Vallco Property Owner, LLC, Simeon Properties, and KCR Properties. It is bisected by North Wolfe Road and bounded by Stevens Creek Blvd to the south, Main Street Cupertino and commercial/office developments to the east, Interstate 280 to the north, and the North Blaney neighborhood to the west. On September 19, 2018, the Cupertino City Council adopted the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan (Plan), which specifies the requirements for land uses, design standards and guidelines for any development within the Vallco Special Area. The Plan aims to transform the existing Vallco Shopping Mall site into a walkable, mixed-use district anchored by retail, entertainment and cultural uses, and supported by new neighborhoods, employment areas and public open spaces. City Council approved the Tier 2 development program identified in the Plan, and community benefits identified within the development agreement. The Tier 2 program includes up to 2,923 residential units, up to 1.75 million square feet of office and office amenity spaces, and up to 485,000 square feet of commercial/ retail and civic/cultural spaces. The community benefits include a new City Hall, a Performing Arts Center, affordable housing to moderate income households, and financial and in-kind contributions toward local transportation improvements and public schools. The Plan acknowledges the proposed Junipero Serra Trail, identifying potential future connections to the trail as part of the development. The Plan is one of two development options, the other being a development pursuant to Senate Bill 35 (SB 35), a new state law targeted to streamlining city approvals for housing developments in cities that do not currently meet state guidelines for affordable housing. City staff approved the SB 35 development on September 21, 2018, which includes up to 2,402 residential units, up to 1.81 million square feet of office space, and up to 400,000 square feet of retail space. Fifty percent of the residential units would be affordable housing in compliance with SB 35. With either development, the City would incorporate a 20-foot wide trail easement along the northwest quadrant of the Vallco Special Area, following the alignment of the Interstate 280 off-ramp, as part of the entitlement process. Villages at Cupertino The Villages at Cupertino is a large apartment, townhome and cottage residential complex located between Stelling Road to the west and Beardon Drive to the east, centered around Valley Green Drive. The proposed trail abuts perimeter parking for most of the Villages development. Additional coordination during the design phase will be required to address concerns related to security and privacy along this edge. 324 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study28Planning Process Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) A critical part of determining project feasibility was to identify and engage key stakeholders and agencies early in the process. This assembled group was called the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The TAC consists of utility companies, affected municipalities, and other agencies critical in decision-making. The TAC convened on multiple occasions to vet materials being prepared for community outreach meetings and provide overall input. The TAC included members from the following agencies: Below is a brief summary of the primary comments from each commenting TAC member: Santa Clara Valley Water District • Open to covering the channel to accommodate trail, however maintenance would become City’s responsibility. • Will not approve any physical barriers between the maintenance road and Junipero Serra Channel. Barriers impede maintenance operations. Concerned also that guardrail would effectively narrow maintenance access road. • Primary need for access is vegetation control. • Maintenance vehicles require a minimum of 15’-0” vertical clearance. PG&E – Pacific Gas and Electric • The tunnel option running East to West through De Anza Boulevard would impact gas lines and other utilities currently below De Anza Boulevard. Relocating these utilities for the tunnel option will be costly. • The bridge option must meet required clearances from the existing overhead transmission lines. • PG&E expressed concern for relocating one of the tubular steel pole (TSP) towers in either the tunnel or bridge option. Relocation would be very disruptive and expensive. • There may be no structures taller than 15’-0” located within the PG&E easement. • City of Cupertino • City of Sunnyvale • CalWater • Caltrans • PG&E – Pacific Gas and Electric • SCVWD – Santa Clara Valley Water District • VTA – Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority In addition to hosting two TAC meetings with all TAC members, individual meetings with some agencies were held to gather more in- depth technical input and discuss initial design alternative options for the study area on an as- needed basis. Input from TAC members was used to directly inform preliminary concepts. 325 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 29Planning Process CalWater • Support a wider trail for maintenance purposes. Main concerns are related to security around their facilities. • There is a water main along Stelling Road across I-280 through the bridge. • There is a water main along De Anza Boulevard, which may conflict with the tunnel option. • Open to providing access through their service yard site for a trail access point. Caltrans • The Lucille Avenue segment under the Blaney Avenue overpass is within Caltrans right-of-way, but Caltrans has a maintenance agreement with the City. • An encroachment permit would be needed for any trail development on Caltrans right-of-way. Access control review may be needed if the trail alignment moves onto the north side of the sound wall. The review process is dependent on the size of the project. • Caltrans approval may be required for any changes to the District’s fee title right of way for Junipero Serra Channel where they reserved ingress egress easement. VTA • Develop a trail consistent with the updated Countywide Bicycle Plan. • Concern about lack of access points. Adding one at CalWater facility would help. • Project could be eligible for 2016 Measure B, Safe Routes to School and ATP funding. • Concern about removal of crosswalk at De Anza. People will still cross instead of using circuitous route to the ramp and over the bridge. City of Sunnyvale • No comments 326 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study30Planning Process Trail Criteria and Standards There are numerous trail design standards and guidelines, sometimes in direct conflict with one another. The following references were reviewed to develop a design basis for the Junipero Serra Trail project. ADA, GDHS, and CHDM provide mandatory standards for trail design. GSLU, NACTO, SJTN, UITD, and WRPM are references providing guidelines and recommendations. Reference Code Reference Title ADA Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design NACTO National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide GDHS American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO): A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets GSLU Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams: A Manual of Tools, Standards, and Procedures to Protect Streams and Streamside Resources in Santa Clara County SJTN City of San Jose Trail Network Tool Kit Planning & Design, Chapter 4 UITD Santa Clara County Uniform Interjurisdictional Trail Design, Use, and Management Guidelines CHDM Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Chapter 1000 WRPM Water Resources Protection Manual Trail Structures Trail structures, such as bridges or tunnels, may be necessary for trail continuity or to create safer trail connections. Intersections with Highways • Where motor vehicle cross traffic and bicycle use are heavy, grade separated crossings are desirable to eliminate intersection conflicts. Where grade separations are not feasible, assignment of right of way by traffic signals shall be considered. Where traffic is not heavy, “STOP” or “YIELD” signs for either the path or the cross street (depending on volumes) may suffice - CHDM – 1003.1 (5) Trail Bridges • Bridges should be a minimum 12’ wide and structurally capable of carrying maintenance vehicles. Fill over culverts, at a minimum, should equal the trail and shoulder widths combined - UITD – 4.1.2 Trail Under-crossings • Clearance of 14’ is desirable to allow for maintenance access - SJTN – p.61 Retaining Walls • Retaining walls parallel to trails are usually discouraged. Where necessary, they should be signed as a hazard - UITD – 4.1.4 Access Controls and Safety Barriers • Where necessary, to prevent motor vehicles from entering the trail, bollards and/or metal gates shall be used at any trail crossing of a public road right-of- way - UITD – 4.2.1 Fencing • Chain-link is only appropriate for temporary installation during construction - SJTN – p. 63 327 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 31Planning Process Trail Relationship to Properties The trail’s proximity to neighbors – single family residential, businesses, apartments, utility facilities – should be taken into consideration. Areas Where Trail Routes are Adjacent to Private Property • Visible fencing should be used, if requested by the adjacent property owner to deter users from leaving the trail. Type of fencing should be determined in consultation with the property owner(s). Security fencing or walls should be no closer to the trail than 3’-6” and no lower than 4’-8” - UITD - 1.1.4 Trail Safety Consideration of trail user safety and security is a key consideration, especially where there are limited access points and opportunity for visual surveillance. Trail Alignments and Intersections with Motorized Vehicles • Trail Alignments should be selected that minimize intersections with motorized vehicles. Where feasible, trail grades should be separated from roadway grades at crossings. Where separated crossings are not possible, at-grade crossings must be designed to equally consider vehicular and trail user safety - UITD – 1.1.5 At-Grade Trail Crossings • At-grade trail crossings should be developed with appropriate safety and regulatory signs for both trail users and motorists where either: a trail route crosses the street; or where a trail terminates at a street designated as in on-street bicycle route – UITD – 1.1.6.2 Grading and Drainage Good grading and drainage need to be designed into the trail to ensure ease of using the trail and to ensure water drains properly throughout the trail site. Grades • Cross slope grades should be limited to 2% – HDM – 1003.1 (14) • Grades are to be held to a minimum. Longitudinal grades of 5% or less are desirable and are to not exceed 8.33% - UITD – 2.3 Drainage • The bike path shoulder shall slope away from the traveled way at 2% to 5% to reduce ponding and minimize debris from flowing on to the bike path – CHDM – 1003.1 (16) • Surface water shall be diverted from trails by out sloping the trail tread between 2% and 3% - UITD – 3.5.5 Drainage Grates, Manhole Covers, and Driveways • Drainage inlet grates, manhole covers, etc., should be located out of the travel path of bicyclists whenever possible. When such items are in an area that may be used for bicycle travel, they shall be designed and installed in a manner that meets bicycle surface requirements. See Standard Plans – CHDM – 1003.5 (2) 328 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study32Planning Process Trail Design Practices Trail design and construction practices set standards to create safe trails. Clearance to Obstructions • A minimum 2-foot horizontal clearance from the paved edge of a bike path to obstructions shall be provided. The clear width of a bicycle path on structures between railings shall not be less than 10 feet. There should be a minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet across the width of the trail and 7 feet over the shoulders – CHDM – 1003.1 (3) Sight Distance • The trail design should provide an optimum 100-foot average sight distance where possible., If sight distances on curves, around hills or through densely vegetate areas are less than 100 feet, safety signs and reduced speed limits should be considered - UITD –2.5 Pavement Structure • It is important to construct and maintain a smooth, well drained, all-weather riding surface with skid resistant qualities, free of vegetation growth. Principal loads will normally be from maintenance and emergency crews – CHDM – 1003.1 (15) Widths and Cross Slopes Trail Width for a Class 1 Multi-Use Trail See Figure 3-25. • Shared-use trails should be designed as paved two-way paths and should have an optimum width of 12’ with a center stripe and a minimal 2’, flush graded shoulders or clear - UITD – 2.2.1 • The minimum paved width of travel way for a Class I, two-way bike path shall be 8 feet, 10-foot preferred - CHDM – 1003.1 (1a) Trail Width • Trail tread width should be determined by amount and intensity of trail use and field conditions. Where treads are narrower than 8 feet, they should be signed and wider turn-out passing areas should be provided at regular intervals. In most cases these trails should not be narrower than 6 feet in order to allow two wheelchairs to pass easily – UITD- 2.2.1 Shoulder • A minimum of 2-foot wide shoulder, composed of the same pavement materials as the bike path or all- weather surface material that is free of vegetation, shall be provided adjacent to the traveled way of the bike path when not on a structure. A shoulder width of 3 feet should be provided where feasible. A wider shoulder can reduce bicycle conflicts with pedestrians. Where the paved bike path width is wider than the minimum required, the unpaved shoulder area may be reduced proportionately – CHDM – 1003.1 (1b) Private Access to Public Trails  Private gates onto public trails are typically not allowed where they present a public safety concern due to operation and maintenance needs – SJTN – p. 40 Based on the above trail design criteria, a class I multi-use trail is defined for this project as having a minimum 10-foot wide paved trail with 2-foot shoulders on either side, for a total width of 14’-0”. Alternative #1 does not meet the minimum standard for a class I multi- use trail between Mary Avenue and the Hyatt House hotel site. For this reason, sections of trail not providing 14’-0” width are described as a Pedestrian Trail. Alternative #2 provides a minimum of 14’-0” width throughout and is designated as a class I multi-use trail. 329 CalTrans Two-Way Class 1 Bikeway Figure 3-25 ES = Edge of Shoulder ETW = Edge of Traveled Way HP = Hinge Point * 1% cross-slope minimum Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 33Planning Process Trail Next to a Stream Local policies dictate trail development along streams. For the Junipero Serra Trail, the portion along Calabazas Creek will be affected. • Trail alignment will be limited to one side of the stream to minimize impacts to impact to habit – WRPM – 3.52 • The goal is to remove the minimum of vegetation as necessary – WRPM – 3.51 330 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study34Planning Process Community Outreach Community meetings and events were the primary means of obtaining input from the public on the project. Input was gathered throughout the design process using a variety of methods. Public input was critical in identifying and evaluating impacts and developing the preferred alternative. To help guide the process, a public outreach plan was prepared and reviewed by City staff and included a total of three (3) community meetings and two (2) community events between September 2017 and June 2018. Additionally, a series of Bike and Pedestrian Commission meetings and Council meetings were utilized to gather more community input and feedback from advisory and decision- making bodies. The community meetings were designed as “open house” style events held within a two- hour window of time on weekday evenings. This allowed participants to arrive at a time that worked best for them. The rooms were set up with stations which participants could navigate reviewing project background information, segment specific details, and other opportunities for input including written surveys. Meeting locations alternated between the Quinlan Community Center and Community Hall to allow a broader cross section of the community to attend. In addition to the community meetings, the team attended two community events including the Diwali Festival at the Quinlan Community Center on September 30, 2017 and Earth Day Festival on April 21, 2018. Booths were utilized to disseminate project information and meeting dates as well as to allow the community to review and comment on plans. Outreach Methods Below is a list of methods used to notify the community: • City’s Website • City Channel • Social Media – Next Door, Facebook, Twitter • Tabling/Flyer Distribution at the Fall Festival, Diwali Festival, Fall Family Bike Fest, and Earth Day • Flyer postings at the Library and City Hall • Door hangers and flyers to residents and businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail • Safe Routes to School (SR2S) monthly newsletter • Postcard mailings to residents and businesses within 300 feet of the proposed trail • Email notification to subscribers of the “Bicycle Transportation Plan” e-mail list • E-mail notification to the Cupertino Block Leaders in the nearby surrounding neighborhoods 331 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 35Planning Process Community Outreach Events Diwali Festival Date: September 30, 2017 Time: 11:00am to 4:00pm Location: Memorial Park, Cupertino, CA A booth was set up at the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce’s annual Diwali Festival announcing the project and upcoming outreach process. The goal was to inform the community about the project and how the project ties into the City of Cupertino’s overarching goal to create a loop trail around the city for pedestrians and cyclists. Community Meeting #1 Date: December 6, 2017 Time: 6:00pm to 8:00pm Location: Quinlan Community Center, Cupertino Room Number of people who signed in: 29 Number of input packets received: 13 The goal of community meeting #1 was to introduce the project goals and objectives, related planning efforts, review opportunities and constraints, and to obtain initial thoughts and concerns from the public. Participants were asked to complete an input packet. Key Comments/Concerns from Meeting:  Safety from Vehicles o Grade-separated crossing at Stelling Road o Grade-separated crossing at De Anza Boulevard  Safety along trail o Lighting, emergency phones, access control fencing behind residences 332 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study36Planning Process Community Meeting #2 Community Meeting #2 was held on two separate dates at two separate locations to provide an opportunity for the community to attend at least one of the meetings and provide input. The same material was presented at both meetings. This meeting followed the same format as community meeting #1, with the addition of a recap of all of the project activities that had transpired since the first meeting. Trail alignments, trail sections and enlargement plans were presented to the public, by segment. Participants had the opportunity to evaluate the alternative alignments and provide feedback. Number of people who signed in between meetings 2A and 2B: 37 Number of input packets received between meetings 2B and 2B: 37* *5 packets were submitted by a neighbor for others who could not attend either meeting Community Meeting #2A Date: February 20, 2018 Time: 6:00pm to 8:00pm Location: Quinlan Community Center, Cupertino Room Community Meeting #2B Date: February 26, 2018 Time: 6:00pm to 8:00pm Location: Community Hall, Cupertino Civic Center Key Comments/Concerns between Meetings 2A and 2B:  Majority of attendees: o Live in Cupertino o Are supportive of the trail o Would bike on the trail o Did not attend community meeting #1  55% of attendees preferred Alternative #2, 16% preferred Alternative #1 and 29% preferred neither alternative o Trail width was a major factor for attendees on deciding which alternative they prefer  58% of attendees live next to the trail  56% of attendees prefer both a grade- separated crossing under Stelling Road and spur trail access with a crosswalk across Stelling Road  When asked which crossing they prefer at De Anza Boulevard, the Bridge Over- Crossing (43%) and Tunnel Under-Crossing (50%) were closely preferred  Safety, Security, and Privacy were some of the main concerns amongst attendees 333 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 37Planning Process Earth & Arbor Day Festival Date: April 21, 2018 Time: 11:00am to 3:00pm Location: Civic Center Plaza, Cupertino, CA A booth was set up at the City of Cupertino’s annual Earth & Arbor Day Festival. Materials presented were similar to what was presented at Community Meeting #2. Instead of an input packet, an interactive board was displayed where community members could vote by placing stickers on the board. Community Meeting #3 Date: June 6, 2018 Time: 6:00pm to 8:00pm Location: Community Hall, Cupertino Civic Center Number of people who signed in: 19 Number of input packets received: 13 This meeting followed the format of the community meeting #1 and #2, with the addition of a recap of all the project activities that transpired since the first meeting. Visual simulations were provided to assist in understanding the undercrossing at Stelling Road and the pedestrian bridge and tunnel options at De Anza Boulevard. Additionally, there was more information pertaining to fencing improvements. Sergeant Brown from the Santa Clara County Sherriff’s office was present to address concerns about safety and security along the trail. Key Comments/Concerns from Meeting:  Majority of attendees: o Had not attended previous meetings o Supported the location of the trail o Would primarily walk on the trail o Live in the City of Cupertino  Mixed feedback about the De Anza Boulevard crossing o Some attendees liked the having a grade-separated crossing option o Other attendees were concerned about safety of a tunnel  Concerns about trail access for Apple employees 334 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study38Trail Alignments 335 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 39Trail Alignments 4 Based on input received from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and community, and evaluation of existing conditions, two trail alignment alternatives were studied in further detail. See Figures 4-5 through 4-7 for the Alternative Alignment Plans. Both alternatives are feasible and represent different solutions for achieving the City’s goal of providing the community with an off-street trail. In addition, opportunities for trailheads and street crossings were studied and are discussed at length in this chapter. Alternatives Evaluation & Preferred Alternative The alternatives evaluated include different options for accessing the trail around the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge approach and crossing alternatives at Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. The alignment alternatives also suggest trail heads at Mary Avenue, Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard, Blaney Avenue, North Portal Avenue, Wolfe Road, Lucille Avenue, Vallco Parkway and connecting to approved trail plans at Vallco and Hyatt House. The community generally expressed a preference for grade separated crossings where possible. They also preferred alternative #2 as it provided a wider trail with more physical separation from residential fences and more potential for trail enhancements. Alternative #2 is also preferred by SCVWD. Pedestrian Trail (less than 14’-0” wide) Alternative #1, next to channel The primary difference between the alternative alignments is their relationship to the existing Junipero Serra Channel in the SCVWD corridor between the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge and Wolfe Road. Alternative #1 utilizes the existing SCVWD maintenance road adjacent to the channel. This trail alternative varies in width, between approximately 7’-6” and 13’-0”. The available width is insufficient in most areas to accommodate a Class I multi- use trail, as described in Chapter 3. This limits the usefulness of this alternative as a two-way bike facility. Bicycles may still use the trail, but the trail would be more uncomfortable for users and could lead to unsafe conditions due to its sub-standard width. 336 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study40Trail Alignments Because the trail would be immediately adjacent to the steep drop-off at the channel, a barrier railing would be required to prevent trail users from falling into the channel. SCVWD expressed they will not approve this alternative because the barrier railing would reduce the usable width of the maintenance road and could impede channel maintenance activities. See Figure 4-1 for typical alternative #1 section. Class I Multi-Use Trail (min. 14’-0” wide) Alternative #2, covered channel and on-grade Alternative #2 converts the open channel into a concrete box culvert, allowing the trail to be located directly over the box culvert. This alternative can accommodate a full Class I multi-use trail including a 10-ft wide paved trail, with 2-ft wide shoulders on each side, for a total width of 14’-0”. Locating the trail over the box culvert also allows the trail to shift northward and be more centered within SCVWD right-of-way. By shifting the trail, there are more opportunities for trail enhancement and screening for the neighboring properties. Trail enhancements may include planting areas that address storm water treatment as well as provide visual screening. Converting from an open channel to a box culvert will require storm water connections to be re-established and tied into the box culvert. Surface run-off, within SCVWD right- of-way, previously entering the channel will also need to be captured and piped into the box culvert. Access manholes would need to be provided at approximately 400-ft intervals to allow for box culvert maintenance. Another consideration related to the conversion from an open channel to a covered box culvert is a change in maintenance responsibility. Maintenance of enclosed culverts or channels is not the District’s expertise. If Alternative #2 is pursued by Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Min 14’ Wide, Covered Figure 4-2 the City, the District will request that the City accept ownership and maintenance responsibility prior to project construction. Based on a preliminary engineering analysis of the watershed contributing to the channel, approximate culvert sizes were determined. From Mary Avenue to Stelling, the culvert would be 4’x4’. From Stelling to De Anza Boulevard, the culvert would be 5’x8’. From De Anza Boulevard to Wolfe Road, the culvert would be 6’x10’. East of Wolfe Road, the channel would remain unlined. Periodic flushing of the box culvert will be required via access manholes spaced at approximately 400’. See Figure 4-2 for typical alternative #2 section. East of Wolfe Road, the existing maintenance road widens sufficiently to support a class I multi-use trail. Trail improvements in this section would leave the unlined channel as-is and would be described as on-grade improvements. See Figure 4-3 for typical standard section. Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Min. 14’ Wide, On-Grade Figure 4-3 The sections that follow describe the trail alignments by segment. The alignments are illustrated and detailed in this chapter through the use of the following: • Narrative Description • Alternative Alignment Maps • Enlargement Plans • Sections • Visual Simulations Figure 4-1 Pedestrian Trail, Less than 14’ Wide 337 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 41Trail Alignments Pedestrian Trail Guardrail, 4’- 6” Tall SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies Public Storage PG&E Transmission Lines To Remain Existing Tree To Remain Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 Drainage Channel To Remain+-35’- 0” PG&E Transmission Pole To Remain Chainlink Fence To Remain +-9’- 0” 2’-0” Shoulder Alternative #1 Existing Public Storage Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 11’- 6”+- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies PG&E Transmission Lines Existing Trees PG&E Transmission Poll Existing Concrete Lined Drainage Channel Existing Chainlink Fence 35- 0”+- Alternative #2 Class 1 Multi-Use Trail SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies Public Storage 10’-0” Min.2’-0”2’-0” Existing Tree To Remain Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 Planted Stormwater Treatment Area Decomposed Granite Shoulder Concrete Box Culvert Shoulder, Typ.Asphalt Trail +-35’- 0” PG&E Transmission Pole To Remain Chainlink Fence To Remain PG&E Transmission Lines To Remain Access Manhole at 400’- 0, typ. Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Figure 4-4 Public Storage Sections 338 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study42Trail Alignments this page intentionally left blank 339 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 43 0 50 100 200 HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL GARDEN GATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PUBLIC STORAGE Mary Avenue Bridge MARY AVENUESTELLING ROADI-280 See Stelling Road Intersection Enlargement HOMESTEAD ROAD CASTINE DRIVEGARDENA DRIVE METEOR D RI V E See Mary Avenue Enlargement (East Option and West Option) City Limits Trail Connection Point / Enlargement Area Existing ConditionsTrail Types Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike RouteGateway Class 1 Bike Path Alternative #2, covered channel On-grade Alternative #1, next to channel Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Pedestrian Trail, less than 14’ wide Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Figure 4-5Alternative Alignment Plan - Segment 1 340 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study44 this page intentionally left blank 341 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 45WOLFE ROADCity Limits Trail Connection Point / Enlargement Area Existing ConditionsTrail Types Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike RouteGateway Class 1 Bike Path Alternative #2, covered channel On-grade Alternative #1, next to channel Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Pedestrian Trail, less than 14’ wide Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide 0 50 100 200 APPLE LAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL BLANEY AVENUEDE ANZA BOULEVARDI-280 See Blaney Avenue Intersection EnlargementSee De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement (Tunnel Under-Crossing and Bridge Over-Crossing) HOMESTEAD ROAD Potential Trail Access Point LUCILLE AVENUE Figure 4-6Alternative Alignment Plan - Segment 2 342 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study46 this page intentionally left blank 343 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 47 0 50 100 200 1 2 Area in-flux, especially on the west side of Wolfe Road. Goal is the get a class 1, multi-use trail into the planning process. Hyatt House development made provisions for trail. City Limits Trail Connection Point / Enlargement Area Existing ConditionsTrail Types Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike RouteGateway Class 1 Bike Path Alternative #2, covered channel On-grade Alternative #1, next to channel Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Pedestrian Trail, less than 14’ wide Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Figure 4-7Alternative Alignment Plan - Segment 3 CALABAZAS CREEKCALABAZAS CREEKTANTAU AVENUE VALL C O P A R K W A YWOL FE ROAD I-280 Vallco Marquee Sign APPLE See Hyatt House Hotel Enlargement Vallco / I-280 Interchange Projects Class 1 Multi- Use Trail, Proposed 20’ Wide Public Trail Easement Potential Future Connection to Vallco Special Area Specific Plan, Typ. 1 2 APPLE 344 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study48 this page intentionally left blank 345 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 49Trail Alignments Segment 1 – Mary Avenue to De Anza Boulevard The community expressed concern with this alternative, including privacy and security for the neighbors, impacts to the trees and the narrower trail width. This alternative is not preferred for the trail because significant tree removal and grading will have to occur. See Figure 4-8 for an enlargement of the East Option. West Option Near Mary Avenue The West Option runs along the west side of the bridge approach, adjacent the Loc- N-Stor facility. This alternative stays entirely within the existing slope easement on Loc- N-Stor’s property. Due to the location of the slope easement, the trail ties into the bridge approach path further north. There is more physical space on this side of the bridge approach, which allows for a full Class I multi- use trail. Additionally, the grades are gentler than the East Option, which means there is less retaining wall length required and it is anticipated to be much lower in height (approximately 1’ to 3’ tall). A few trees would need to be removed, but not as many as the East option. Loc-N- Stor expressed concern with security having the trail so close to the fence line, as they have had break-ins in the past. Loc-N-Stor is proposing to improve their property and has submitted preliminary plans for City approval. The City may request a condition of approval on the redevelopment of Loc-N-Stor’s property to allow for future implementation of a trail. Continued coordination will be required between the City and Loc-N-Stor along this edge to satisfy any outstanding concerns of having a trail in this location. The community expressed a preference for this alternative as it locates the trail further away from residences, allows for a wider trail and requires far fewer tree removals. See Figure 4-9 for an enlargement of the West Option. Segment 1 runs from Mary Avenue to the west side of De Anza Boulevard. Starting at the westernmost trail extent, Segment 1 begins at the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge plaza. The bridge approach presents a choice for how to access the trail within the SCVWD corridor. The approach slopes upward to meet the bridge deck elevation over Interstate 280, while access to the proposed Junipero Serra Trail requires an access path, on either side of the bridge approach, to slope down to conform with grades at the SCVWD maintenance road. Both access path options are feasible and a more detailed description of each option is presented below. See Figure 4-10 for a section of the East Option and West Option for Mary Avenue. East Option Near Mary Avenue The East Option runs along the east side of the bridge approach, directly behind the residential properties on Nathanson Avenue. The trail would tie into the existing plaza at Mary Avenue and run parallel to the residential wood fences northward to the SCVWD right- of-way. The trail would be offset from the fence a minimum of 3’-0” to provide a privacy buffer. Due to considerable cross slopes and limited space available, the trail may need to be narrower than a full Class I multi-use trail. For these reasons, the paved trail width through this section would be reduced to 10’ wide. Additionally, a retaining wall up to 8’ in height would be required to obtain suitable flat area for a 10’ wide trail. The east side of the bridge approach also contains numerous mature trees, including large redwoods requiring removal to accommodate a trail. Lastly, the trail parallels overhead utilities and poles that would need to be avoided in this area. 346 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study50Trail Alignments Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Centerline Culvert Tree To Be Removed Class I Bike Path Existing Trail to Mary Avenue BridgeInterstate 280Open Channel Low Split Rail Fence, Typ. Begin Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel Guardrail Private Residence Fence 10’ wide Pedestrian Trail Proposed Tree, Typ. Storm Water Management Proposed Vegetation, Typ. Minimum 3’ Wide Buffer from Residential Fence Existing Loc-N- Stor Property Fence To Remain Existing City Property Fence To Remain, Typ. Existing Maintenance Gate To Remain Retaining Wall, 6’ to 8’ Tall 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Figure 4-8 Mary Avenue Enlargement East Option 347 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 51Trail Alignments Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Centerline Culvert Tree To Be Removed Class I Bike Path Wood Fence To Remain Re-aligned Maintenance Gate Private Residence Fence Existing Maintenance Access To Remain Existing Loc-N- Stor Property Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel Guardrail Retaining Wall, 1’ to 3’ Tall Proposed Tree, Typ.Existing Trail to Mary Avenue BridgeProposed trail within existing slope easement Interstate 2800 15’ 30’ 60’ Figure 4-9 Mary Avenue Enlargement West Option 348 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study52Trail Alignments Existing Tree Existing Tree To Be Removed Existing Public Service EasementCity of Cupertino Width Varies Existing Trail Residential Existing Tree Existing Tree To Be Removed Existing Chain-link Fence with Barbed Wire Existing Fence Mary Avenue Bridge Existing Pedestrian Lighting Cupertino Loc-N-Stor Existing Slope Easement Cupertino Loc-N-Stor Existing Public Service EasementCity of Cupertino Width Varies Looking North Looking North Existing Slope Easement Existing Trail Residential Existing Chainlink Fence With Barbed Wire To Remain Existing Fence To Remain Existing Fence To Remain Mary Avenue Bridge Existing Pedestrian Lighting To Remain Retaining Wall Retaining Wall 12’-0”2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ.2’-0”2’-0” Pedestrian Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. 10’-0” Narrowed Trail to Gain Buffer From Residential West Option: Multi-Use Trail Along Loc-N-Stor Property With Minimal Grading To Adjacent Hillside East Option: Pedestrian Trail With Reduced Trail Width To Pull Trail Away From Adjacent Residential Property. Significant Tree Removal and Grading Will Be Required. Existing Proposed 75’- 0”+- 75’- 0”+- Figure 4-10Mary Ave Sections 349 High Visibility Crosswalk Example Figure 4-11 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 53Trail Alignments Mary Avenue to Stelling Road After Mary Avenue, the trail turns east within SCVWD right-of-way towards Stelling Road for approximately 0.5 miles. This section of trail is located behind single family residences and runs parallel with PG&E’s overhead electrical transmission lines supported by lattice towers. Many of the homes in this section are physically separated from SCVWD right- of-way by a greater distance than elsewhere on the trail due to the presence of the PG&E easement next to the SCVWD right-of-way. Stelling Road Stelling Road represents the first major street crossing. The community expressed a desire for grade-separated street crossings for trail user convenience and safety reasons. With that input, a number of options were evaluated for crossing Stelling Road. A bike-pedestrian bridge over Stelling Road was evaluated but quickly proved problematic due to the large number of overhead electrical lines impeding any proposed alignment over the street. The overhead lines on the west side of Stelling Road are particularly low and would require relocation or undergrounding to accommodate a bike-pedestrian bridge. Additionally, this section of SCVWD’s right-of- way is very constrained with respect to width. Accommodating a bike-pedestrian bridge and a spur trail side by side within a 25’ to 30’ wide space is challenging. The bike-pedestrian bridge also introduces privacy concerns as the bridge approach on the west side of Stelling Road would give trail users views into backyards. The east bridge approach would be adjacent to a parking lot, so privacy concerns there are not as significant. A tunnel was also evaluated at this location. CalWater and PG&E have significant underground utilities at this location that would require relocation to accommodate a tunnel. The width constraint is also a factor as running a tunnel side by side with a spur trail would be difficult within the space available. The drainage culvert under Stelling Road would also need to fit alongside the tunnel. The space doesn’t accommodate a tunnel, spur trail and culvert, side by side. For these reasons, the tunnel is not a feasible option. Another option evaluated was an undercrossing at Stelling Road. The trail would meander north onto Caltrans right-of- way, ramping down underneath Stelling Road at the west approach and ramping up at the east approach. A nearby example is along the Stevens Creek Trail at Middlefield Road and Highway 85. This option minimizes the utility conflict concerns present with both a bike-pedestrian bridge and tunnel option. It also eliminates the space constraint concerns since the main trail and spur trail utilize both SCVWD and Caltrans right-of-way. There would also be reduced privacy concerns as the trail undercrossing would be below street level on Caltrans right-of-way and away from residences. See Figure 4-12 and 4-13. At street level, a high visibility crosswalk with flashing beacon signal is recommended to increase visibility of pedestrians and cyclists crossing Stelling Road at-grade. Trail head plazas are proposed for both sides of Stelling Road as a trail amenity and branding opportunity for the trail. The community preferred the undercrossing option to an at- grade only crossing of Stelling Road. See Figure 4-14 for an enlargement of the Stelling Road Intersection Enlargement. Stelling Road to De Anza Boulevard The trail continues east after Stelling Road. This section of Segment 1 is located behind the Villages at Cupertino residential community, Public Storage and the multi-family residential development at 10745 De Anza Boulevard. See Figure 4-4 for a typical section through this area. Segment 2 starts just west of De Anza Boulevard. 350 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study54Trail Alignments Figure 4-12Grade-Separated Under-Crossing at Stelling Road Existing Conditions under Stelling Road Figure 4-13 351 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 55 0 15’ 30’ 60’Stelling RoadInterstate 280 Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel Barrier Railing, Typ. At-grade Higher Visibility Crosswalk, with pedestrian beacon Open Channel Access Control Fence At Trail Edge Sloped Trail Undercrossing, <5% Running Slope, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Cross Sections = 14’ Wide Trailhead Plaza With Seating, Typ. 30 MPH Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Channel (When Covered) HWY 85 Stevens Cre e k T r a i l Middlefield Overhead Figure 4-15Under-Crossing Example Figure 4-14Stelling Road Intersection Enlargement 352 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study56 this page intentionally left blank 353 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 57Trail Alignments Segment 2 – De Anza Boulevard to Vallco De Anza Boulevard Overall, Segment 2 runs from the west side of De Anza Boulevard to the west side of Vallco Shopping Mall. The intersection at De Anza Boulevard is adjacent to multi-family residential, Apple’s Infinite Loop campus and I-280 on and off ramps. Additionally, the PG&E overhead transmission lines cross over De Anza Boulevard and the Junipero Serra Channel is conveyed via culvert under De Anza Boulevard. There are CalWater and PG&E facilities (among others) beneath De Anza Boulevard running north and south. The community expressed a strong desire for a grade separated crossing to mitigate conflicts between trail users and vehicular traffic at this busy intersection. Three alternatives for crossing De Anza Boulevard were evaluated and are discussed further below. Tunnel Alternative There are a number of obstacles to avoid with a tunnel option beneath De Anza Boulevard. The existing culvert beneath the street will need to remain in its current alignment, so any tunnel option will need to remain entirely on one side of the culvert. Additionally, there needs to be space for a spur trail and a set of stairs to access the tunnel from the street. With constraints on available width, the proposed tunnel option would require property acquisition on both sides of De Anza Boulevard to accommodate stairs. The tunnel will directly conflict with underground utilities in De Anza Boulevard. Further utility coordination would be required if the tunnel option is pursued. Additionally, the existing PG&E poles present a challenge for the footprint of the tunnel. The pole on the west side of De Anza Boulevard is located on the south side of the Junipero Serra Channel and the pole on the east side of De Anza Boulevard is located on the north side of the channel. Keeping the tunnel within SCVWD right-of-way would require the relocation of one of the poles. The proposed plan shows the relocation of the west-side pole into Caltrans right-of-way. This clears enough room to accommodate the spur trail, the tunnel approach ramp and the stairs. The tunnel itself would be at least 10’-0” wide and 10’-0” tall and equipped with security lighting and a skylight at the median to allow natural light. Stairs into the tunnel should consider bike runnels to allow more direct trail access for bikes. The wall opposite the stair entrance may be angled to allow more visibility and natural light into the tunnel approach. The stairs and spur trail would all be accessed at grade from a trail head plaza on both sides of De Anza Boulevard. See Figures 4-19 through 4-21 for an enlargement plan and a visual simulation of this alternative. Stevens Creek Trail Figure 4-17Stevens Creek Trail Tunnel Example 2 Figure 4-18Tunnel Finishes Figure 4-16Stevens Creek Trail Tunnel Example 1 354 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study58Trail Alignments Figure 4-19 Figure 4-20 Tunnel Visual Simulation 1 Tunnel Visual Simulation 2 Tunnel under De Anza Boulevard, looking west Tunnel approach under De Anza Boulevard, looking West 355 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 59 Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Channel Centerline CulvertDe Anza Boulevard0 15’ 30’ 60’ Interstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p PG&E Tower To Be Removed Tunnel Under-Crossing With Skylight For Natural Lighting Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain Tunnel Approach Ramp Tunnel Approach Ramp Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide 40 MPH Reocated PG&E Tower on Caltrans R.O.W. Existing Property Fence, Apple Stairs to Tunnel Under-Crossing, Typ. Figure 4-21De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - Tunnel Under-Crossing 356 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study60 this page intentionally left blank 357 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 61Trail Alignments Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Like the tunnel option, there are obstacles associated with the bike-pedestrian bridge. Because the bridge is an aerial structure, the conflicts associated with underground utilities and the culvert under De Anza Boulevard are reduced. However, the overhead electrical lines become problematic. An initial alternative of the bike-pedestrian bridge illustrated relocation of the PG&E pole on the east side of De Anza Boulevard would be required to keep the bridge away from overhead wires and remain entirely within SCVWD right-of-way. Concern for significant construction costs and coordination effort related to relocation of a PG&E pole led to the development of a second alternative where the PG&E pole would not have to be relocated. At the same time, a supplemental survey was commissioned to determine exact pole locations and vertical clearance between the roadway and the lowest wires. The survey indicated that the lowest wires were approximately 37-feet above the roadway surface on De Anza Boulevard. Thirty-seven-feet does not provide enough clearance for a bike-pedestrian bridge. The required vertical clearance over De Anza Boulevard is 17’-0”. Assuming a concrete structure, the depth of the bridge deck would be approximately 4’-6”, resulting in a bridge deck elevation of 21’-6” above De Anza Boulevard. The barrier fencing on the bridge adds another 8’-0” minimum, bringing the total structure height to 29’-6” above De Anza Boulevard. With the wires being 37’-0” above the roadway, that leaves approximately 7’-6” between the top of bridge structure and the lowest hanging wires. PG&E requires 12’-0” vertical clearance from any of their overhead supply conductors and supply cables running between 750 to 22,500 Volts. This information further solidified the requirement to minimize the bridge footprint from being under the wires. In this second bridge alternative, the alignment was shifted north to avoid the PG&E poles with a minimum of 6’-0” horizontal clearance per PG&E requirements. The bridge would be located within Caltrans right-of-way and would require modifications to a traffic signal pole, a street light, a utility box and a pull- out along the on-ramp. There would be stairs leading up to the bridge deck on both sides of De Anza Boulevard. On the west side, the stairs would come from an at-grade plaza at the intersection. On the east side, the stairs need to be shifted far enough east to keep the stairs below PG&E’s vertical cable clearance and 15’-0” maximum height for structures within their easement. See Figure 4-24. 358 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study62Trail Alignments Figure 4-22 Figure 4-23 Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Visual Simulation 1 Bike-Pedestrian Bridge Visual Simulation 2 De Anza Blvd bike-pedestrian bridge overhead view looking south at De Anza Blvd De Anza Blvd bike-pedestrian bridge on the west plaza looking west at the stairs up to the brige 359 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 63 this page intentionally left blank 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Santa Clara Valley Water District Property PG&E Easement De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - Bridge Over-Crossing Figure 4-24 De Anza BoulevardInterstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Bridge Access Ramp, 4% PG&E Tower To Remain Stairs to Bridge Over-Crossing Bridge Approach Ramp, 4% Trailhead Plaza, Typ. Bridge Over-Crossing Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Bridge Approach Ramp, 4% PG&E Tower To Remain 40 MPH Traffic Light to be Relocated Utility Box to be Relocated Pull Out to be Removed Cobra Light to be Relocated Drainage Channel Centerline Culvert 360 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study64 this page intentionally left blank 361 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 65Trail Alignments At-Grade Crossing At-grade trail crossing alternatives were also evaluated for the De Anza Boulevard crossing. The current signal timing has high potential for conflicts with two south-bound off-ramp right hand turn lanes turning at the same time as the pedestrian “walk” signal phase. Two different at-grade alternatives were explored: Alternative 1 would not include the construction of any physical improvements, but signal timing would be modified such that the off- ramp right-turn and pedestrian crossings would not be in conflict. It is anticipated this would result in a degradation of traffic operations at the intersection. Alternative 2 would include the construction of an additional lane on the southbound I-280 off-ramp, resulting in a left-turn lane, shared left-turn/through lane, and two dedicated right-turn lanes. This change would allow separation of the ramp signal phase, making it possible for the crosswalk phase to operate concurrently with the eastbound off-ramp left turn/through movement. Overall delay would remain relatively consistent with existing conditions in this scenario. See Figure 4-26. Alternative 2 is the recommended at-grade alternative as there would be minimal traffic impacts, while also increasing trail user and vehicular safety. The complete design memorandum for the at-grade crossing can be found in the Appendix. De Anza Boulevard to Blaney Avenue Between De Anza Boulevard and Blaney Avenue, the trail runs adjacent to Apple’s Infinite Loop campus and along Lucille Avenue in a residential neighborhood. Apple may desire to have an employee access point in this section of trail adjacent to their campus. The overhead electrical transmission lines continue to run through this section with PG&E’s tubular steel poles (TSPs) located very close to the proposed trail alignment, particularly if trail alternative #1 is selected. Due to width constraints, the locations of these poles and trail alignment will require further study during a detailed design phase due to the narrow width available between the PG&E pole and the top of channel. See Figure 4-28 for typical sections of this trail section. Figure 4-25High Visibility Crosswalk Example 362 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study66Trail Alignments 363 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 67 this page intentionally left blankDe Anza BoulevardInterstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Add 4th Traffic Lane, Redesignate Lanes - 2 Left Turn and 2 Right Turn Trail PG&E Tower To Remain, Trail Pinch Point PG&E Tower To Remain Trailhead Plaza, Typ. Existing Utilities and Infrastructure to be Relocated - Backflow, TS Cabinet, Irrig. Controller, 2-(E) Service Me- ter, Transformer, TS Pole, Curb Ramp, Signs, Pull Boxes, Crosswalk Widen Median Opening to accomodate crosswalk width 14’ Wide High Visibility Crosswalk with two 4’ wide Ped Lanes, and one 6’ wide Bike Lane Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain Trail Existing Property Fence, Apple Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Drainage Channel (When Covered) 40 MPH De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - At-Grade Crossing - Alternative #2 Figure 4-26 364 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study68 this page intentionally left blank 365 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 69Trail Alignments Blaney Avenue The 0.22-mile section parallel to Lucille Avenue is the only portion of the trail that’s not behind homes or businesses. This section of the trail provides an access opportunity not often available between major intersections elsewhere along the trail. Should trail alternative #2 be pursued, there’s potential for the trail to be separated from Lucille Avenue with planting enhancements, a lower fence to allow improved visibility and aesthetics. Intermittent decomposed granite paths connect to the trail from Lucille Avenue. If trail alternative #1 is selected, the trail will be narrower in places and located closer to the street. A trail head with amenities such as seating, signage and decorative paving is depicted. Also, improved connections to the trail are shown such as a crosswalk, traffic calming bulb-outs and sidewalk improvements. Some neighbors expressed concern at the community meetings about parking and speeding concerns along Lucille Avenue with the implementation of a trail. The City may want to explore as a policy, implementing permit parking for portions of Lucille Avenue, while allowing for some expected trail use parking. Bulb-outs may also help alleviate any speeding along Lucille Avenue. See Figures 4-28 and 4-29. Pinch Point Below Blaney Avenue Further east, the trail encounters a challenging 100’ long section starting below the Blaney Avenue overcrossing to the open Junipero Serra Channel adjacent to Lock It Up storage. At the bend of North Blaney Avenue, there is a 10-foot wide pinch point between the sound wall and metal beam guard rail. A potential solution for widening the trail here is to shift the street curb line 2’ inward and relocate the guard rail accordingly. A guy anchor would need to be modified to allow vertical clearance for trail users. See Figure 4-29 for the location of the 10’ wide pinch point on the Blaney Avenue Enlargement and Figure 4-27 for an image of the pinch point. The sound wall, near the pinch point, stops just east of the Blaney Avenue overcrossing and becomes chain link fence. Further consultation with Caltrans may be required to install additional sound wall to protect trail users from a vehicle potentially leaving the freeway and ending up on the trail. North Portal Avenue Trail Access Heading east from Blaney Avenue, the trail goes behind Lock It Up storage and residential neighborhoods. At the CalWater facility at North Portal Avenue, there is another trail access opportunity. In early meetings with CalWater, they have been amenable to the idea of providing trail access through their facility, provided appropriate security protections are designed. The CalWater property is currently used to maintain vital water supply for the City. For the trail entrance, an access easement should be obtained to allow trail users to travel through the property to access the trail at the east end of the property. To give access to trail users, the existing fence and gate should be removed and a new fence and gate should be installed to still allow CalWater access and security of their facility. Bollards should be placed after the new gate, trail signage at the entrance to the CalWater property, and “NO PARKING” signs on the asphalt along the trail entrance should be placed to deter trail users from parking within the trail entrance and to prevent CalWater vehicles from being blocked from accessing their equipment on their property. See Figure 4-30 for the North Portal Avenue Trail Access Enlargement. Figure 4-27Pinch Point between Sound Wall and Guard Rail 366 City R.O.W.Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 18’- 6”+- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 40’- 0” Existing Tree Existing Tree Existing Sound Wall PG&E Transmission Pole Lucille Avenue Existing Chain-link Fence Existing Concrete Lined Drainage Channel PG&E Transmission Lines Existing Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study70Trail Alignments Figure 4-28 Alternative #1 Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 40’- 0” Varies, 10’-0” Max.2’-0”2’-0” Pedestrian or Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. City R.O.W. Existing Tree To Remain Sound Wall To Remain Guardrail, 4’-6” Tall, Only Where Drop-Off Slope Exceeds 3:1 Concrete Lined Drainage Channel To RemainLucille Avenue Existing Tree To Remain 3:1 Split-Rail Fence, 3’-0” Tall, With Openings Along Lucille Avenue For Trail Access PG&E Transmission Lines To Remain PG&E Transmission Pole To Remain Alternative #2 Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 40’- 0” 10’-0”2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. City R.O.W. Existing Tree To Remain Sound Wall To Remain Lucille Avenue Existing Tree To Remain Split-Rail Fence, 3’-0” Tall, With Openings Along Lucille Avenue For Trail Access Concrete Box Culvert PG&E Transmission Lines To Remain PG&E Transmission Pole To Remain Planted Stormwater Treatment Area Access manhole at 400’- 0”, typ. Lucille Avenue Sections 367 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 71 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Interstate 280 Blaney AvenueRandy LaneVilla De Anza AvenueProposed Sidewalk To Meet Existing Sidewalk at Olivewood Street Metal Beam Guardrail At Curve Existing Edge Of Street Proposed Curb Shift, 2’-0” approximately 10’ Width At Pinch Point Paved Trail Access Point Guy Anchor To Be Modified, Maintain Min. 10’ Vertical Clearance Over Trail Trail utilizesexisting undercrossing Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel Trailhead Existing Tree To Remain, Typ.Landscaping, Typ. Existing On-street Parking Seatwall, Typ. Low Split Rail Fence, Typ. Wires Overhead, Typ. D.G. Path Connection, Typ. PG&E Tower, Typ. Proposed Crosswalk and Sidewalk With Ramps 25 MPH Lucille Avenue Enlargement Legend Trail Parking, explore extension of permit parking on Lucille Curb Bulbout, Typ. Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Channel Centerline Culvert Blaney Avenue Trail Access Enlargement Figure 4-29 368 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study72 this page intentionally left blank 369 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 73 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Int e r s t a t e 2 8 0 Proposed Double Gate New Asphalt Pavement Existing Gate to be Removed Existing Driveway to Remain Existing On Street Parking Existing Asphalt Path to Remain Proposed Removable BollardsProposed Trail Access Spur, Utilize Ex. Cal Water Driveway Proposed Trail Wayfinding SignagePortal AveDrake DrivePARKINGNO 15’Proposed Access Control Fence Proposed Trail CA L T R A N S R . O . W . S. C . V . W . D . P R O P E R T Y Drainage Channel Centerline Enlargement Legend North Portal Avenue Trail Access Enlargement Figure 4-30 370 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study74 this page intentionally left blank 371 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 75Trail Alignments Segment 3 – Vallco to Vallco Parkway Segment 3 of the trail runs from the west edge of Vallco to Vallco Parkway alongside Calabazas Creek. Starting at the western extent, the Vallco site is currently being proposed for re-development and is in a state of flux. The developer is working with City staff on a proposal for the site. It is anticipated that the trail will follow the northern edge of the Vallco site and connect to the Perimeter Road undercrossing below Wolfe Road. Additionally, VTA is leading a design effort to reconstruct the Wolfe Road interchange at I-280. Caltrans’ Project Study Report for the project has been completed, and an environmental assessment of the alternatives is being performed. Preliminary alternatives depict connections from the Wolfe Road sidewalks to the Junipero Serra Trail. The trail project will need to conform to the interchange project as designs advance. The trail would utilize the Perimeter Road undercrossing and connect to the Hyatt House development project, currently under construction. The Hyatt House is constructing a 10’ wide trail as part of their project, which will serve as a small reach of the overall trail. See Figure 4-7 for the enlargement plan of this area and Figure 4-31 for the Hyatt House Enlargement, which is a part of this area. Commencing at the Junipero Serra Channel side of the Hyatt House project, a full Class I multi-use trail can be constructed adjacent to the channel. This section of the channel is unlined and will remain unlined. The trail continues east behind the Apple campus until the unlined channel’s confluence with Calabazas Creek. The trail at this point, turns southward along the west bank of Calabazas Creek. This section continues to accommodate a class 1 multi-use trail adjacent to the creek. SCVWD studies indicate that the maintenance road along Calabazas Creek is below top of bank and subject to inundation during 10-year storm events and greater. During large storm events, temporary trail closures will be needed to ensure trail user safety/locking swing gates accompanied by signage are recommended as means for securing the area. City staff would be responsible for monitoring flow conditions and closing this section of the trail as needed. Improvements to the Calabazas Creek maintenance road may require approvals from regulatory agencies including the California State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. There is a potential trail head and connection to a signalized intersection on Vallco Parkway, which would connect the trail to existing bike street infrastructure and Main Street, a popular mixed-use neighborhood. Additional coordination with Apple and the City is required for this trail head location. See Figures 4-32 and 4-33 for sections through segment 3. 372 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study76Trail Alignments 373 Trail AlignmentsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 77 HYATT HOUSE HOTEL - CUPERTINO, CA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - AUGUST 13, 2014AADROP-OFF / ENTRY PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OUTDOOR DINING POOL EXISTING TREE SHADE TREE FLOWERING / SEASONAL TREE IN GRATE UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREE STREET TREE IN GRATE PUBLIC ART DECORATIVE PAVING BANDS (GRAVEL OR CONCRETE) PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK TRASH/RECYCLING BIN STORMWATER PLANTING ADA ACCESSAIBLE RAMP SCREENED TRANSFORMER LEGEND NORTH SCALE:1” = 20’-0” L-1 12 12 13 13 8 1 3 4 6 7 2 2 2 7 7 10 11 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 16 15 14 13 8 0’ 5’20’10’10’ To Existing Under-crossing HYATT HOUSE HOTEL - CUPERTINO, CA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - AUGUST 13, 2014AADROP-OFF / ENTRY PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OUTDOOR DINING POOL EXISTING TREE SHADE TREE FLOWERING / SEASONAL TREE IN GRATE UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREE STREET TREE IN GRATE PUBLIC ART DECORATIVE PAVING BANDS (GRAVEL OR CONCRETE) PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK TRASH/RECYCLING BIN STORMWATER PLANTING ADA ACCESSAIBLE RAMP SCREENED TRANSFORMER LEGEND NORTH SCALE:1” = 20’-0” L-1 12 12 13 13 8 1 3 4 6 7 2 2 2 7 7 10 11 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 16 15 14 13 8 0’ 5’20’10’10’ Connection to Proposed Trail Hotel Bicycle / Pedestrian Path, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Wol fe Road Concept Plan prepared by Bruce Jett Associates, 8/13/14 Trail Types Alternative #2, covered On-grade Alternative #1, next to Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Pedestrian Trail, less than 14’ wide Class I Multi-Use Trail, min. 14’ wide Hyatt House Hotel Enlargement Figure 4-31 374 Trail Alignments Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study78 this page intentionally left blank 375 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 79Trail Alignments Existing Apple Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 21’- 0”+- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies Existing Tree 65- 0” Existing Tree Chainlink Fence Existing Vegetated Drainage Channel Existing Chainlink Fence Proposed Existing Tree To Remain Existing Tree To Remain 10’-0”2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. Apple Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 65- 0” Chainlink Fence To Remain Vegetated Drainage To Remain Chainlink Fence To Remain 3:1 Figure 4-32Apple Campus Sections 376 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study80Trail Alignments Apple SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 70’- 0” + Existing Tree To Remain 10’-0” Min. 2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. Chainlink Fence To Remain Calabazas Creek Riparian Vegetation To Remain 3:1 Proposed Apple 24’- 6”+- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 70- 0” + Existing Tree Calabazas Creek Riparian Vegetation Existing Existing Chainlink Fence Figure 4-33Calabazas Creek Sections 377 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 81Trail Alignments Safety, Privacy, and Security The previous sections of this chapter have discussed the trail alignment in detail. This section discusses trail safety, privacy and security. Suggestions are provided for fence types to suit various conditions along the trail. Privacy/Security Fence Adjacent to Residential The existing fencing behind homes varies with regard to materials, height, visual openness and condition. Many neighbors expressed two concerns in particular. One is privacy and how trail users may be able to see into their properties. The other is security and whether fencing will discourage intrusion into their property. One potential solution regarding the privacy concern is to install opaque fencing for those properties with open chain link or similar fence type. A solution for discouraging intrusion is installing a fence of such height and design that climbing over it is a deterrent. To meet these two criteria, it is recommended that a 7’-0” tall wood fence be installed at those properties currently deficient in either privacy and/or security. It is anticipated there may be some existing fences or walls that meet this standard, and no work is required to upgrade fencing. See Figure 4-34. Split Rail at Lucille Frontage A split rail fence is recommended at the Lucille Avenue frontage. Aesthetically, this would be more inviting than the existing chain link fence. This fence type also allows more visibility since it’s lower than the existing chain link and more visually open. But it still provides a delineation between trail use and street use. There would be openings in the fence to allow trail access from the street. See Figure 4-35. Undercrossing Barrier at Stelling Road Where the trail goes beneath Stelling Road, a Caltrans approved barrier fence will be required to keep trail users from entering the freeway. Additionally, the fence may need to be designed to resist vehicular impact. The design of this fence will require further coordination with Caltrans as the design advances. See Figure 4-36. Figure 4-35 Figure 4-34 Privacy/Security Fence Example Figure 4-32 Split Rail Fence Example Figure 4-36 Under-Crossing Barrier Example 378 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study82Trail Alignments Figure 4-38Fencing Example Rendering - Before Figure 4-39Fencing Example Rendering - After Figure 4-37Guard Rail Example Guard Rail Adjacent to Open Channel Where trail alternative #1 is pursued, a 4’- 6” tall guard rail is recommended along the open Junipero Serra Channel to prevent trail users from accidently falling into the channel. However, the SCVWD will not approve any trail with a guard rail along the Junipero Serra Corridor due to maintenance access constraints. Further discussion with SCVWD will need to occur if a guard rail is pursued for the trail. See Figure 4-37. Middle and Bottom Images: Show the impacts of the Privacy/ Security Fence adjacent to residential and the Guard Rail Fence adjacent to the open- for alternative #1. 379 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 83Trail Alignments Trail Security One of the main concerns amongst community members was security along the trail. To address some of their concerns, the following options may be considered for the trail. Patrols Increased sheriff presence on the trail and near trailheads would help deter undesirable activity along the trail. The trailheads could be designed to allow vehicular access for policing activities, whether by patrol car or ATV. Bicycle patrol could also be included in the policing plan for the trail. See Figure 4-40. Security Cameras Security cameras could be installed at key locations, such as trailheads and intermediate points along the trail with limited visibility. The cameras can record suspicious activity on the trail and aid law enforcement in the event of criminal activity. The visual presence of security cameras also acts as a deterrent. See Figure 4-41. Milestone Markers Milestone markers provide emergency personnel and first responders specific location information in the event of an emergency along the trail. They can also provide trail users with distances to measure their exercise regimen. See Figure 4-42. Lighting Lighting along trails is generally discouraged when adjacent to a riparian zone. The Junipero Serra Trail is planned to operate dawn to dusk. However, the following exceptions may apply: • Lighting along commuter corridors during the winter months from 5am to 7am and 4pm to 8pm • At trail under-crossings • Where the trail is parallel to lighted streets and roads • At street intersections and street crossings Figure 4-40 Figure 4-41 Figure 4-42 Trail Patrol Security Camera Milestone Marker 380 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study84Summary Recommendations 381 Summary Recommendations Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 85Summary Recommendations 5 The study recommends alternative #2. This alternative provides an off-street, paved class I multi-use trail and is consistent with current bicycle and pedestrian plans adopted by the City. The trail links to existing on- street facilities, residential neighborhoods, employment centers, schools, retail and commercial uses. The estimated cost to build out the recommended alternative is $45.2 million. The SCVWD and the City of Cupertino will have to enter into a joint use agreement for the corridor if any of the alternatives are pursued. The City would also be responsible for all trail maintenance. Utility agencies would continue to operate and maintain their facilities. Safety, security and privacy were the biggest concerns raised by the community. To address these concerns, fencing upgrades will be recommended where existing fences are deficient in terms of privacy and security. The study recommends implementing a sheriff patrol program and that the City consider the use of security cameras and milestone markers. Throughout the alignment, there are a number of sub-alternatives at specific locations to consider. The table below summarizes the alternatives and provides recommendations for each. 382 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study86Summary Recommendations Trail Alignment Recommendations Summary Location Location Options Options Overall Trail Alignment Mary Ave Connection to Trail Stelling Rd Crossing Alt #1 East Under-Crossing Only Alt #2 West At-Grade Crossing Only Alternatives Sub-Alternatives Both Under-Crossing and At-Grade Crossing De Anza Blvd Crossing Tunnel Bike-Pedestrian Bridge within SCVWD Right-of-Way At-Grade Crossing, Alt #1 Bike-Pedestrian Bridge within both SCVWD and Caltrans Right-of-Way At-Grade Crossing, Alt #2 = Recommended Option 383 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 87Summary Recommendations Options Alternative #1 (in millions of dollars) Alternative #2 (in millions of dollars) Basic Project $7.1 $29.4 Basic Project, Stelling Rd Under- Crossing and At-Grade Crossing, and De Anza Blvd Bike-Pedestrian Bridge within both SCVWD and Caltrans Right-of-Way $22.9 $45.2 Basic Project, Stelling Rd Under- Crossing and At-Grade Crossing, and De Anza Blvd Tunnel $30.1 $52.4 Trail Alignment Cost Matrix Cost Estimate Costs for the Junipero Serra Trail were estimated for each trail alternative, broken out by segment, and in 2018 dollars. A line item was developed for “basic project” costs. Those costs include all the work required to build a basic trail project plus contingencies, escalation, and professional services related to the basic project. The basic project includes costs for construction of the trail with trailheads (including the Mary Avenue West Option) and at-grade crossings. Costs for the Stelling Road undercrossing, De Anza Boulevard tunnel, De Anza Boulevard bike- pedestrian bridge, and De Anza Boulevard at- grade crossing were broken out as separate ‘all-in’ costs. This estimating strategy allows decision-makers to see price points at various levels of trail implementation and starts to suggest where project phasing might occur. Detailed cost estimates for alternative #1 and alternative #2 can be reviewed in the Appendix. 384 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study88Summary Recommendations Grant Funding Sources There are several grant funding programs the Junipero Serra Trail will be eligible for, including the Transportation Fund for Clean Air: Bicycle Facilities Grant Program (TFCA), administered by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), administered by the California Department of Parks and Recreation; and the Active Transportation Program (ATP), funded by the California Transportation Commission. Funding for these programs has concluded for Fiscal Years 2018-2019, but additional cycles are anticipated. The 2018 TFCA program allocated over $5 million to fund construction of new bicycle facilities that will reduce vehicle trips for commutes to work and/or school. With its proximity to multiple schools and direct connection to multiple large employers, the Junipero Serra Trail would be a strong candidate for the award. Minimum awards in this past cycle were $100,000 with a 10% required match. The LWCF aims to fund park projects that meet the goals of the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. This project meets those goals by providing community space for healthy lifestyles, and through its process of community engagement. The maximum award for this program’s 2018 cycle was $3,000,000 with a required minimum 50% match. The ATP Cycle 4 is expected to announce the award of approximately $440 million in May, 2019. The program extends through 2023, and is awarded annually to California infrastructure projects that enhance safety and mobility for non-motorized transportation. It also gives consideration to Safe Routes to School projects, with the stated goal of enhancing public health and reducing childhood obesity. Because the project is within two miles of more than one public school, it qualifies for the Safe Routes to School designation, and enhanced consideration under this program. Another potential source is the Pedestrian and Bicycle Project Funds available under the Transportation Development Act, Article 3. For a project to be included in annual allocation of these funds, a city must request that the county recommend the project for inclusion in its allocation. These funds are available for projects that exclusively benefit pedestrians and/or bicyclists, and that are consistent with the City’s bicycle and pedestrian plan. Continuous interconnected routes, continuity with longer routes, and access to activity centers are all preferred qualities. Santa Clara County voters approved Measure B in 2016, which would have funded a variety of transportation projects, including bicycle and pedestrian improvements. However, a legal challenge and subsequent appeal has delayed initiation of any projects related to the measure until the suit is resolved. The Junipero Serra Trail would be a strong candidate for award of funds pending resolution of the lawsuit. 385 Summary RecommendationsJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 89 this page intentionally left blank 386 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study90Summary Recommendations 387 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 91Summary Recommendations Figures City Council Steven Scharf, Mayor Liang Chao,Vice-Mayor Rod Sinks, Council Member Darcy Paul, Council Member Jon Willey, Council Member Barry Chang, Former Council Member Savita Vaidhyanathan, Former Council Member Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Jennifer Shearin, Chair Gerhard Eschelbeck, Vice Chair Pete Heller, Commissioner Eric Lindskog, Commissioner Sean Lyn, Commissioner City Staff Public Works Department Community Development Department Acknowledgments Technical Advisory Committee Chris Wilson, CalWater Sergio Ruiz, CalTrans Lillian Tsang, City of Sunnyvale Ted Quach, PG&E Albert Le, PG&E Usha Chatwani, Santa Clara Valley Water District Lauren Ledbetter, VTA Taghi Sadaati, Cupertino Sanitary District Richard Tanaka, Cuperinto Sanitary District Consultant Team Callander Associates, Landscape Architecture Brian Fletcher, Principal-in-charge David Rubin, Project Manager Jana Schwartz, Graphics Kelly Kong, Graphics Fehr and Peers, Transportation Consulting Steve Davis Sandis, Surveying/Civil Engineering Ron Sanzo Jenner Phillips 388 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study92Appendix Meeting Summaries Start Up Meeting Summary SCVWD Meeting Summary TAC Meeting #1 Summary Staff Meeting Summary Community Meeting #1 Summary CalWater Meeting Summary PG&E Meeting Summary CalTrans Meeting Summary TAC Meeting #2 Summary Community Meeting #2 Summary Community Meeting #3 Summary Outreach Materials City Flier City Postcard City Door Hanger City Door Hanger for Portal Ave Residents CALA Hand Out Apple R.O.W. Acquisition Exhibit Sandis - Surveyor Box Culvert E-mail CalTrans Box Culvert Notes De Anza Blvd Overhead Wires Survey Input Materials Community Meeting #1 Input Packet Community Meeting #2 Input Packet Community Meeting #3 Questionnaire Input Board for Diwali Festival 94 94 96 98 102 104 112 114 116 118 122 136 148 148 149 150 151 152 153 155 155 157 161 163 163 167 175 177 389 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 93Appendix 6 179 179 185 185 189 190 192 209 209 219 227 209 209 227 235 235 236 240 (to be included) Community Meeting #3 Materials What We Heard Boards Memos Document Review Public Outreach Outline Public Outreach Plan De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo Cost Estimate Cost Estimate for Alternate #1 Cost Estimate for Alternate #2 Engineering Option of Probable Construction Costs for Box Culvert for Alternative #2 Draft De Anza Boulevard Crossings Draft - De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - Bridge Over-Crossing - PG&E Tower to Remain Draft - De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - Bridge Over-Crossing - PG&E Tower to be Removed TAC Comments on Draft Study City of Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Comments Caltrans Comments SCVWD Comments City of Cupertino Responses to TAC Comments 390 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study94Appendix Start Up Meeting Summary BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via E-mail Only August 23, 2017 Meeting Summary I-280 Channel Trail Feasibility Study RE: Project Start-Up Meeting Date: Tuesday, 8/22/17 Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. (Site Walk: 3:30 p.m. to 5:15 p.m.) Attendees: City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com A meeting was held to kick-off the project, review background information and materials needed, discuss project goals and objectives, and review the City’s preliminary thoughts on public outreach, branding, and TAC coordination. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in bold identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Discussed 1)City to send back executed agreement by 8/29 or soon after, CA submitted signed agreement to JC at meeting on 8/22. 2)Roles and Responsibilities a)CA to correspond through JC and copy DS b)City to correspond through DR and copy JS 3)Project Materials a)JC to request 2016 contours and aerial by 8/25 (received by CA on 8/23) b)CA to send link for contours and aerial to Sandis by 8/29 and ensure files are AutoCAD compatible c)JC to send link to assessors maps by 8/25 (received by CA on 8/23) d)CA to ask Sandis about materials needed by 8/25 and correspond with City e)Other planning efforts underway include: •Pedestrian Trail Guidelines (expected adoption later this year) •Countywide Bicycle Plan by VTA (late 2017) 391 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 95Appendix Start Up Meeting Summary I-280 Channel Trail Feasibility Study RE: Project Start-Up Meeting August 22, 2017 Page 2 of 2 17056_SUM_StartUpMtg © copyrighted 2017 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Discussed •City to provide input from Parks and Recreation Master Plan (in-progress) f)CA to review City standard details, suggested by City 4)TAC Formation a)CA to separate invite for TAC and businesses/private owners, TAC will be agencies only b)DS to correspond with businesses/private owners •Likely businesses/private owners: −Apple −Loc-N-Stor −Vallco −HOAs c)CA to create directory by 9/30 for TAC and businesses/private owners 5)Public Outreach Plan a)City/CA to staff 2 community events (Diwali Festival-Sep., Earth Day-Apr.) b)Consider small community events (i.e. Farmers’ markets, Bike to Work Day) throughout study period to promote project. These would be attended by City staff c)City to select outreach dates/locations by 9/15 and reserve space for events d)CA to get notices out by 9/20, before Diwali Festival e)CA to send examples of prior notices/flyers by 8/23 for City to review 6)Branding a)City to review and provide feedback on branding by 8/30 •City to meet on 8/28 to review/discuss branding for the trail •City to discuss use of “The Loop” •City to suggest use of branding colors, font, graphic style from other City-signage programs b)City to send wayfinding signage example to CA from bike boulevard project (received by CA on 8/23) c)CA to provide branding alternatives by 9/13 for City to review and to incorporate in outreach materials - END - The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 392 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study96Appendix SCVWD Meeting Summary BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: SCVWD Review Meeting Date: November 28, 2017 Time: 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Attendees: SCVWD : Sue Tippets (ST), SCVWD, stippets@valleywater.org Usha Chatwani (UC), SCVWD, uchatwani@valleywater.org Cody Houston (CH), SCVWD, chouston@valleywater.org Devin Mody (DM), SCVWD, dmody@valleywater.org Consultants: Jon Cacciotti (JCa), HMHca, jcacciotti@hmhca.com Jodi Starbird (JS), DJP, jstarbird@davidjpowers.com City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review the project with SCVWD, gather technical input, and discuss design alternative options for the drainage ditch that runs parallel to the trail alignment study area. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take 1.SCVWD generally prefers no barrier between trails/maintenance roads and creeks. However, if there is a severe drop they would consider a low open barrier. CA to study edge conditions 2.SCVWD discussed the desire for "permeable pavement" use however during further discussion the intent is for more natural looking pavements. They talked about a recent project that Google did near Crittenden Bridge. CA to review example project 393 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 97Appendix SCVWD Meeting Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: SCVWD Review Meeting December 1, 2017 Page 2 of 2 17056_SUM_SCVWDMtg.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. 3.The Junipero Serra Creek was never a creek. The drainage ditch was constructed when I-280 was built. It was constructed by Caltrans then transferred over to the Water District. CA to remove “creek” from all materials 4.Would be open to considering an option that would replace the ditch with a closed pipe and buried. This should not be the only option studied. SCVWD expressed some hesitance with the maintenance of a closed pipe as they are more comfortable with maintaining open channels. CA to include covered and open alternative options -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 394 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study98Appendix TAC Meeting #1 Summary BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: TAC Meeting #1 Date: November 29, 2017 Time: 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Attendees: TAC Member: Richard Tanaka (RT), CSD/Mark Thomas, rtanaka@markthomas.com Usha Chatwani (UC), SCVWD, uchatwani@valleywater.org Lauren Ledbetter (LL), VTA, lauren.ledbetter@vta.org Lillian Tsang (LT), City of Sunnyvale, ltsang@sunnyvale.ca.gov City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Erick Serrano (ES), Planning, ericks@cupertino.org Ben Fu (BF), Planning, benjaminf@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review the project background and existing conditions of the site, discuss the trail alignment locations, and gather technical input and documents from the TAC members. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take 1.The Junipero Serra Trail (trail) has been identified as a high priority by City Council. The trail would be a recreational/transportation corridor. Apple has a large bicycle population that would likely use it. The trail supports Cupertino’s interconnectivity. Noted 2.SCVWD refers to the waterway in the corridor as a “drainage ditch”, it is not a natural channel. It was constructed in conjunction with the construction of I-280. Noted 395 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 99Appendix TAC Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: TAC Meeting #1 December 1, 2017 Page 2 of 3 17056_SUM_TACMtg#1.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 3. LL noted personal security concerns, lack of access points. Access points are identified on the site assessment plans; an access point at the CalWater facility is to be evaluated. Stevens Creek is a trail that also has limited access points, high volumes of users makes it feel safe. CA to review project with CalWater by 12/15 4. Treatment of trail crossings over major streets: Stelling is an on- street crossing with possible beacons; City is encouraging grade- separated crossing at De Anza; Blaney has a curve that creates pinch point; Vallco will be coordinated with concurrent planning projects. Noted 5. SCVWD has maintenance requirements in the corridor; need access for maintenance and vegetation management; installation of a concrete guard rail closed off access near Wolfe Rd. recently. Noted 6. Caltrans should have a hydraulic report available for I-280 that would elaborate on the drainage ditch. It is believed that the ditch was constructed to accommodate 100 year storm from overland flows, from the neighborhoods, intercepted before flowing onto the freeway. Waters from I-280 are not believed to be flowing into the drainage ditch. Caltrans turned responsibility over to SCVWD. CA to request hydraulic report and drawings for the ditch from Caltrans by 12/8 7. RT discussed CalWater 14” ACP water line at the confluence of the drainage ditch and the Calabazas Creek. Location of facilities is unknown. CalWater crosses the creek at image #30. Check 14’-0” trail width availability. CA to discuss with CalWater by 12/15 8. There is a sanitary easement adjacent to the SCVWD property in the vicinity of the Apple campus (photo images #13 - #20). There is an undersized 8” sewer line within the easement that the Sanitary District to upgrade to at least 12”. They are studying options. CA to review by 12/15 9. Sanitary District needs width of 8’-0” (HydroFlush truck capabilities); SCVWD will inform CA of width requirements/preference. UC to provide width requirements by 12/15 10. VTA is updating the Countywide Bike Plan now (available February 2018); trail eligible for 2016 Measure B, Safe Routes to School, and ATP funding. CA to review funding options with VTA and include in report estimate 396 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study100Appendix TAC Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: TAC Meeting #1 December 1, 2017 Page 3 of 3 17056_SUM_TACMtg#1.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 11.SCVWD is seeing a lot of challenges in dealing with trails – people want them available 24/7, but SCVWD has to occasionally close trail for maintenance. SCVWD has noticed impacts to riparian areas and trails are getting more constrained. There is a trend towards evaluating trails policy (CSJ developing Toolkit). SCVWD wants to review VTA Countywide Bike Plan when available to include SCVWD policies. SCVWD wants to stay away from lighting and bridge crossings. Noted 12.RT asked if the City would consider ownership of R.O.W. where trail is being proposed; it would be a multi-use trail over a drainage facility, not a flood control facility. City to review 13.VTA is managing Wolfe interchange project with HMH. No plans available yet; in environmental review phase (15-18 month timeline); not fully funded. Noted -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 397 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 101Appendix this page intentionally left blank 398 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study102Appendix Staff Meeting Summary BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Staff Meeting, Phone Call Date: November 30, 2017 Time: 10:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Attendees: City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review TAC Meeting #1 and prepare for Community Meeting #1. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take TAC Meeting #1 1.VTA funding sources for the Junipero Serra Trail is a part of the County-wide bicycle plan. Funding sources will be incorporated into the estimates for the feasibility study. CA to email VTA (Lauren Ledbetter) by 12/8 2.Need to better understand the structure of the drainage ditch and how stormwater intercepted. In a covered alternative, consider appropriate pipe sizing/capacity. Access and maintenance requirements will also need to be accounted for. CA to review with Caltrans by 12/15 3.Need to show a non-covered alternative for the trail alignment. Alternatives show cost difference and ability to accommodate class 1 facilities. CA to include in alternatives 4.Send email with TAC meeting materials to non-attendees (Caltrans, Cal Water, PG&E) and schedule follow-up call/meeting to discuss project purpose/objective and agency concerns. JS to send draft email text and materials to City. City to send email by 11/30 399 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 103Appendix Staff Meeting Summary Meeting Summary Juniper0 Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Staff Meeting, Phone Call December 1, 2017 Page 2 of 2 17056_SUM_StaffMtg_171130.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 5.Send Doodle poll to TAC members to coordinate time for next TAC meeting (February). JC to send Doodle by 12/8 Community Meeting #1 6.Room layout for event has attendees visiting 7 stations and recording input in a handout. CA created diagrammatic layout of the Cupertino Room with table/chair layout and the purpose for each station. JC to send layout to City staff by 12/1 for room preparation 7.City staff includes Jenn, David, and Erick. CA will be positioned at segment stations; City staff will be positioned at sign-in, goals + objectives, background, and floating around the room. Noted 8.Finalize all materials for the meeting and bring to event. Remove “creek” on all materials. CA to bring materials to event 9.Refreshments to be provided at community meeting CA to provide -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 400 Community Meeting #1 Summary SAN MATEO SAN JOSE RANCHO CORDOVA Recreate 311 Seventh Avenue 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate San Mateo, CA 94401 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 12, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 Location: Quinlan Community Center, Cupertino Room Date: December 6, 2017 Time: 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Number of people who signed-in: 29 Number of people who turned-in an input packet: 13 Attendees: City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Erick Serrano (ES), Planning, ericks@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com Community Meeting #1 was open house style where participants were invited to arrive at any time during the event window (6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) and provide individual feedback on the trail project. Community members were notified about the event through the following methods: •City’s website •City Channel •Social media (Next Door, Facebook, Twitter) •Tabling/flyer distribution at the Fall Festival, Diwali Festival, Fall Family Bike Fest •Flyer postings at the Library and City Hall •Door hangers and flyers to residents/businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail extents •Safe Routes to School (SR2S) monthly newsletter The meeting included six stations for community participants to provide their input at their own pace. Station #1 was the welcome table, where participants were greeted by City staff and provided an input packet to record comments as they traveled between stations. The five additional stations included project background and goals and objectives (Station #2), Stations #3, 4, 5 were for the three segments of the proposed trail, and refreshments (Station #6). Participants were asked to return their input packets to Station #1 before leaving so that their comments could be recorded. The next sections review the input methodology and summarize the input received at the meeting. Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study104Appendix401 Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 2 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Commenting Material Community Meeting #1 included several opportunities to provide written input and have that input recorded. Input methods included the input packet, the trail segment plans, and large flip charts. Participants were not limited to one commenting method and everyone was encouraged to document their input. Below is a description of each input method available: Input Packet The input packet included the same two open-ended questions for each trail segment. Community members were asked to respond to these questions as they traveled to each of the trail segments. •Questions 1: What do you like about this segment of the trail? •Question 2: What can be improved in this segment of the trail? Trail Segment Comments The trail was divided into three segments and set up at three separate stations (Stations #3, 4, 5). Each trail segment plan was printed at a large scale to help community members identify neighborhood features and the proximity of the trail to community resources (i.e., schools and businesses). Participants were invited to draw and write on each plan to provide feedback on each trail segment. Commenting directly onto the large plans is a useful tool for input because context can be applied to a specific comment and ideas can be drawn and documented. Each of the trail segments provided this input method, but the geographic differences between each segment generated unique comments from the community. •Trail Segment #1 – Mary Avenue to De Anza Boulevard This segment includes the connection to Mary Avenue Bridge and the on-street bicycle network that connects to Garden Gate Elementary School. This segment includes a street crossing at Stelling Road. •Trail Segment #2 – De Anza Boulevard to Vallco Center This segment is in close proximity to Lawson Middle School and runs along the northern edge of the Infinite Loop. This segment includes a street crossing at De Anza Boulevard and would have the trail running under Blaney Avenue. •Trail Segment #3 – Vallco Center to Vallco Parkway This segment is near the Vallco Center and runs along the northern edge of to the new Hyatt Hotel and Apple. The trail runs under Wolfe Road and terminates at Vallco Parkway and Calabazas Creek. Flip Charts Flip Charts were placed at Station #2 and each of the three trail segment stations (Stations #3, 4, 5). Flip charts did not include a prompted question, all feedback provided was open-ended. Not all Stations with flip charts received comments. Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 105Appendix402 Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 3 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Input Received Station #2 - Project Background and Goals and Objectives Flip Chart •Please keep redwood trees along I-280 frontage. Do not cut down. They run the length of I-280 from Los Altos to San Jose so the provide a greenbelt along the freeway and buffer residential from the freeway. Redwoods also clean impurities from the air. Station #3 – Trail Segment #1 (Mary Avenue to De Anza Boulevard) Input Packet – Question #1 •I would like to have lights on the way, some benches to sit, a water station, restroom facility •Connecting the trail to the bridge is great! •No stoplights (well almost) •Minimal cross streets •The bike bridge •Everything •Good access to western areas in the city •It's a trail •Less car traffic for students going to De Anza College •Easy connection to Mary Ave. bridge and avoids Stevens Creek Blvd. •Connectivity to Mary Avenue Bridge •Takes you to Mountain View •Connection to Mary Avenue Bridge Input Packet – Question #2 •Protect bikes from falling into ditches •Have a camera at the main junctions •Put up signs (dog on-leash, no loitering, speed limit) •Stelling Rd. crossing needs bridge over •Need mile markers •Access to the trail via Stelling Rd. is too dangerous for kids •Take it along the wall all the way to De Anza College; use the City maintenance land to go from Mary Ave back to the sound wall here •Put underground crossing under Stevens Creek Blvd to De Anza College •Have the City buy a house along [Flora Vista Ave.] to allow Lawson students to access the trail (Garden Gate Elem. feeds into Lawson Middle) •Need access near [photo] #4; buy a house, tear it down, provide access •A glass sound wall so Teslas stuck in traffic can see how fast bikes go •East end of bike bridge (Homestead Rd and Mary Ave) needs to be reconfigured •Need grade separation (prefer underpass) for trail at Stelling Rd. •Improve Stelling Rd. crossing if possible •Safety and security of residence and businesses - how are we going to protect our business and homes along the path? Need regular monitoring for security concerns! •Parents will still drive kids to neighborhood regardless Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study106Appendix403 Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 4 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Crossing at Stelling Rd. should be above or below street, no crosswalk is near the access point right now •Widen 14' for multi-use •All segments use over or under grade crossings to major streets •Extend via bridge or tunnel to De Anza College and across 85 with dedicated bridge protected from cars/ramps •Traffic light or bridge tunnel between [picture] #6 and #7 •Prefer the route be closer to storage, as it would have less impact on the residents and it is wider •Safety and security of the trail while maintaining safety, security and privacy for the residents impacted by the trail Trail Segment Plan Comments •This speed table [on Meteor Dr.] will drive cars to Amulet then Nathanson Ave. •Median on Meteor Dr. slows traffic and is a good thing •Nobody stops at Nathanson Ave. turning onto Meteor Dr. •Some late night noise at trail head [Mary Avenue Bridge] •Hit by car at Glenbrook •Mini-store employee concern about vandalism and homeless •Purchase property at curve of Castine Ave. to Gardena Dr. •Pedestrian bridge would be great between image #7 and #8 (Stelling Rd.) [other response] - or tunnel •Suggest 20' minimum width to accommodate bikes, strollers, etc. Flip Chart Comments •Deter vehicular speed •Drivers don't respect hawk signals •Steven's Creek Blvd and Homestead Rd are existing east-west on-street connections •Fencing for neighbors •Trail is very isolated Station #4 – Trail Segment #2 (De Anza Boulevard to Vallco Center) Input Packet – Question #1 •Keep the existing trees and plant some new trees •IDEA: Give property owners a cut in their property taxes to allow a portion of their land for the trail is selected cases. Bar Harbor along their harbor does this •Spur to Lawson Middle along the east edge of Apple's property •Will help Apple and it’s near my house :) •Everything •This is a great connector across the city without riding/walking on busy streets •It's a trail •Less vehicle traffic •Avoids Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 107Appendix404 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study108Appendix Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 5 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Good east-west trail through Cupertino Input Packet – Question #2 •Under/over bridge at the De Anza Blvd. crossing •Add underground crossing under De Anza Blvd. •Do not remove car access under Blaney Ave. bridge, it is used heavily •Do not remove parking on Lucille Ave because it is used by PBC Church, apartment tenants, and Apple •Take trail UNDER De Anza Blvd., look at Loveland, CO for examples! •Removing vegetation to put trail in will increase sound from freeway, please put sound considerations high on design list •Use negotiations with Apple to get Lawson students off the street [arrow pointed to east edge of Apple property] •A wide, bright tunnel at [image] #17 •Suggest oaks with hairy leaves that will filter the freeway soot (East PA has done this) •Pedestrian/bike undercrossing at De Anza Blvd. •Add connection along Apple sound wall (parallel to Larry Way) to permit direct route to Lawson Middle and Merrit Way bike boulevard •De Anza Blvd. crossing •Safety of bikes •Widen 14' for multi-use •De Anza Blvd crossing should be above or below street level •Make access for Garden Gate Elementary •Reduce conflict between north-bound De Anza Blvd. to south-bound I-280 vs. crossing Trail Segment Plan Comments •Suggest a tunnel or bridge (built by Apple of glass and chrome…) •Evening backup on I-280 south-bound on-ramp at De Anza Blvd. •Will this trail connect to De Anza Blvd. bike lanes? Optimize the crossing •Loveland, CO has lots of underpass connections •Bar Harbor - gave a cut in property taxes to allow for trail •Could there be a spur [east side of infinite loop Apple property], provide connection to school and bike boulevard [other response] - yes! •[Between image #15 and #16] Church parking, don't take parking away •Add label for all BQ zoned properties •When apartments are full [between Blaney Ave. and Randy Ln.] they park on street •Don't close the loop under Blaney Ave. •[Behind Mini-Stor] - Lots of graffiti when fence comes down; •Wolfe improvements get tagged, may have taken another chain-link fence •If trail is narrower than full width, is it harder to obtain funding? •I would use [the trail] on commute and evening walks •Look at Santa Clara Agilent property - proposed trail 405 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 109Appendix Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 6 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Flip Chart Comments •No comments provided at this station Station #5 – Trail Segment #3 (Vallco Center to Vallco Parkway) Input Packet – Question #1 •Overall love this idea of Cupertino Loop; can't wait to start running on the trail •Will help Vallco and retail, when it's built •Everything •Utilization of existing Wolfe underpass at Vallco •Access to Main Street and future Vallco activities and shopping •It's a trail •Less Apple traffic •Wolfe crossing is not at street level •Allows access to Vallco and Main Street •Scenic •Connection to Main Street, hotels, Apple Input Packet – Question #2 •Add emergency blue poles throughout the trail •Vegetation all along wall helps with freeway pollution and sound reduction, please consider this when designing the entire trail •Bridge trail over Wolfe Rd. •Overall, I suggest a 20' minimum width to accommodate a wide range of transportation preferences; trees, trees, trees (large species) •Why not a full width new trail around "Section A"? [Hyatt Hotel Trail segment] •Make sure bicycles abide by same rules as road users •Make SHP developer incorporate bike access to trails •Nothing •Turning left onto Vallco Pkwy. on a bicycle is impossible/dangerous/requires using sidewalk? Trail Segment Plan Comments •Why not go across? [keep trail parallel to I-280, cut through Wolfe Rd. interchange and hook into trail at the Hyatt Hotel] •Make the new trail at the hotel property wider, it's new •Bridge over Wolfe Rd.? [Where underpass is currently] •Is Perimeter Rd. public or private; is there an easement? •Be aware of how a dotted melted strip bike lane feels on 110 psi bike tires •Radius of speed hump should exceed that of 27" bike wheel! •Traffic volume will increase at Vallco Pkwy. and Tantau Ave. intersection •Continue trail across I-280 [follow Calabazas Creek] and connect at Tantau Ave. •Add button for cyclists well ahead of intersection with priority timing [Idea is to be able to hit the button while on your bike and the light will be green by the time cyclist gets to the intersection] •[At the Vallco Pkwy. trailhead] - What happens when you want to turn left onto Vallco Pkwy.? 406 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study110Appendix Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 7 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Add roundabout at Tantau Ave./Vallco Pkwy. intersection [other response] - I would be scared to use that Flip Chart Comments •No comments provided at this station Community Meeting #1 Images This section illustrates images captured from the meeting. Sign-in and Input Packet Pick-Up Trail Section Background and Goals and Objectives Background and Goals and Objectives Trail Section Input Packet 407 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 111Appendix Community Meeting #1 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #1 December 12, 2017 Page 8 of 8 17056_SUM_CommMtg#1_171206_Final.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If you have any questions, additions, or corrections to this memo, please contact this office in writing within three days. Submitted by: Dave Rubin, Project Manager, Callander Associates cc: All attendees Attachments: 1.Input Packet Response Data Presentation 2.Notification Flyers 408 CalWater Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study112Appendix BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 7, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: CalWater Review Meeting, Phone Call Date: December 6, 2017 Time: 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Attendees: California Water Service (CalWater): Chris Wilson (CW), CalWater, cwilson@calwater.com City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review the project with CalWater and gather technical input. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take 1.CalWater is supportive of the project. There are certain security measures to consider in implementing a trail next to their facilities, mostly concerning access control. Noted 2.CalWater is adding concertina wire to address intrusion issues. CalWater has vandalism and trash dumping in the past. Noted 3.CalWater has an underground tank at this site that serves a large portion of Cupertino. Noted 4.CalWater supports a wider trail for maintenance purposes. Currentl they access corridor from N. Portal Avenue. Noted 5.CalWater is open to the idea of providing access through their site to access the trail. CA to consider CalWater site as a potential trail access point. -END- 409 CalWater Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 113Appendix Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: CalWater Review Meeting, Phone Call December 7, 2017 Page 2 of 2 17056_SUM_CalWaterMtg.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 410 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study114Appendix PG&E Meeting Summary BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 14, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: PG&E Review Meeting (Conference Call) Date: December 12, 2017 Time: 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Attendees: PG&E: Jessy Borges (JB), PG&E, jy16@pge.com Ramiro Coronel (RC), PG&E, RSC7@pge.com Ted Quach (TQ), PG&E, tpq1@pge.com Albert Le (AL), PG&E, ahla@pge.com City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review the project with PG&E, gather technical input, and discuss initial design alternative options for the study area. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take 1.PG&E noted the presence of gas lines near the drainage ditch. There are gas lines at Stelling Rd. City to request gas facilities throughout project limits. 2.115kv overhead electrical transmission lines run along the project limits. City to request electrical facilities throughout project limits. 3.PG&E needs a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) to provide mapping information. City to coordinate with PG&E. 4.Maintenance road would need to support line trucks, trucks weigh approximately 80 tons. Noted. 411 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 115Appendix PG&E Meeting Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: PG&E Review Meeting (Conference Call) December 14, 2017 Page 2 of 2 17056_SUM_PGEMtg.docx © copyrighted 2017 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 5.Wire height will need to be verified. The voltage goes up as the height increases. PG&E to verify wire clearances. 6.Identify locations where poles potentially conflict with trail alignments. CA to mark up and send exhibit to City. -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 412 CalTrans Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study116Appendix BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only December 22, 2017 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Caltrans Review Meeting (Conference Call) Date: December 20, 2017 Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Attendees: Caltrans: Sergio Ruiz (SR), Caltrans, sergio.ruiz@dot.ca.gov City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review the project with Caltrans, gather technical input, and discuss initial design alternative options for the study area. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take 1.SR has requested drainage ditch As-Builts from the hydraulic team and has not heard back. SR will follow-up with the design team to get turn-around time for drawings. SR to request drainage ditch As- Builts within the project limits. 2.The road segment under the Blaney Rd. overpass (on Lucille) is Caltrans R.O.W., but Caltrans believes that segment has a maintenance agreement with the City. SR to locate the maintenance agreement and send to JC. 3.An encroachment permit would be needed for any trail development on Caltrans R.O.W. Access control review may be needed if the trail alignment moves onto the north side of the sound wall. The review process is dependent on the size of the project. Caltrans can review the drawings once a trail alignment is decided. Noted. 413 CalTrans Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 117Appendix Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Caltrans Review Meeting (Conference Call) December 22, 2017 Page 2 of 2 17056_SUM_CalTransMtg.docx © copyrighted 2017 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 4.Caltrans will make their draft Bicycle Plan available. SR to provide draft plan. -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 414 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study118Appendix TAC Meeting #2 Summary BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only February 6, 2018 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: TAC Meeting #2 Date: January 31, 2018 Time: 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Attendees: TAC Member: Usha Chatwani (UC), SCVWD, uchatwani@valleywater.org Lauren Ledbetter (LL), VTA, lauren.ledbetter@vta.org Lillian Tsang (LT), City of Sunnyvale, ltsang@sunnyvale.ca.gov Ted Quach (TQ), PG&E, tpq1@pge.com Albert Le (AL), PG&E, ahla@pge.com Chris Wilson (CW), CalWater, cwilson@calwater.com Steve Davis (SD), Fehr&Peers, s.davis@fehrandpeers.com T. Saadati (TS), Walk Bike Cupertino, tsaadati@sbcglobal.net Dianne Yee (DY), Caltrans, dianne.yee@dot.ca.gov City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Erick Serrano (ES), Planning, ericks@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com The purpose of this meeting was to review input received from Community Meeting #1, discuss the trail alignment plan alternatives, and gather technical input and documents from the TAC members. The following information was discussed and/or decided upon in our meeting. Items in the “Action to take” column identify specific action items and the party responsible. Item Action to take Segment 1 – Mary Avenue Bridge to De Anza Boulevard 1.The public storage facility near De Anza Boulevard may include a public access easement as a part of a redevelopment project. Plans should identify easement and review impacts. CA and City to review by 2/14 2.JC asked what “covering the ditch” means. Is the action to cover or to rebuild? The design assumes a box culvert. Noted 415 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 119Appendix TAC Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: TAC Meeting #2 February 6, 2018 Page 2 of 3 17056_SUM_TACMtg#2.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 3.LL asked how the alternative route for maintenance closures was selected. It is based on existing bike/ped facilities and directness. Noted 4.All development projects are subject to PG&E review. Noted 5.How much is the undercrossing encroaching on Caltrans R.O.W? CA to review and provide to Caltrans by 2/14 6.There is a water main along Stelling Road (unknown if the line runs through the bridge or under I-280). CW sent drawings on 2/6 Segment 2 – De Anza Boulevard to the Vallco Shopping Center 7.The guy anchor near trail entrance at the curve of Lucille Road can be repositioned for vertical clearance. Noted 8.If the ditch stays open (along Lucille) versus a closed ditch, amenities shown in the enlargement (i.e. bioswale retention, a continuous class 1 facility, etc.) will not be included. Noted (this is true for all alternative #1 scenarios) 9.Relocating a steel transmission pole is expensive (~$1 million). Noted 10.If the crosswalk is removed across De Anza Boulevard, people will still cross and additional treatments may be required. CA to review with the City by 2/14 11.LL asked about bicycle behavior in response to the circuitous route at De Anza Boulevard with the stair and ramp approaches. Noted 12.SCVWD asked how the bridge will be supported and still preserve maintenance access? CA to review by 2/14 13.TS asked if there is an option to move the spur trail onto Caltrans R.O.W. for the tunnel crossing scenario. CA to review by 2/14 14.There is a CalWater water main along De Anza Boulevard (through tunnel option) and one behind Apple’s Infinite Loop. CW sent drawings on 2/6 15.What are the lighting requirements for the trail? Are there CMAQ requirements? The lighting may be dawn/dusk or 24 hours. CA to review by 2/14 16.Clearance from PG&E wires is still unknown. SCVWD requires 15’-0” vertical clearance for maintenance vehicles. Noted 416 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study120Appendix TAC Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: TAC Meeting #2 February 6, 2018 Page 3 of 3 17056_SUM_TACMtg#2.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Item Action to take 17.5% grade might be too steep for bridge and tunnel approaches; consider switchbacks or reducing the grade. Noted Segment 3 – Vallco Shopping Center to Vallco Parkway 18.Identify and preserve access gate for SCVWD near the Hyatt Hotel (at I-280 on-ramp); hotel plans do not show access for SCVWD. Noted 19.CalWater has a water main that crosses I-280 and moves towards Vallco Parkway. CW sent drawings on 2/6 20.Incorporate design recommendations from this feasibility study into the Wolfe Road / I-280 / Vallco Plans Noted 21.Design a better transition at the Vallco Parkway trailhead. Noted -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. Submitted by: Dave Rubin Callander Associates cc: All attendees 417 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 121Appendix this page intentionally left blank 418 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study122Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary SAN MATEO SAN JOSE RANCHO CORDOVA Recreate 311 Seventh Avenue 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate San Mateo, CA 94401 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only March 5, 2018 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #2a and 2b Meeting #2a Location: Quinlan Community Center, Cupertino Room Date: February 20, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Meeting #2b Location: Community Hall, Cupertino Civic Center Date: February 26, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Total number of people who signed-in: 37 Total number of people who turned-in an input packet: 37* *5 packets were provided by a neighbor for others who could not attend either meeting Attendees: City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Erick Serrano (ES), Planning, ericks@cupertino.org Julie Chiu (JCh), Public Works, juliec@cupertino.org Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Jana Schwartz (JS), jschwartz@callanderassociates.com Community Meeting #2 was held on two separate dates at two separate locations to provide an opportunity for the community to attend one of the meetings and provide input. Community Meeting #2a was held in the Cupertino Room at the Quinlan Community Center on February 20th and Community Meeting #2b was held in the Community Hall at the Cupertino Civic Center on February 26th. Community members were notified about the event through the following methods: •City’s website •City Channel •Social media (Next Door, Facebook, Twitter) •Tabling/flyer distribution at the Fall Festival, Diwali Festival, Fall Family Bike Fest •Flyer postings at the Library and City Hall •Door hangers and flyers to residents/businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail extents 419 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 123Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 2 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Safe Routes to School (SR2S) monthly newsletter •Postcard mailings to residents/businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail extents including residents/businesses within 300 feet of a proposed trailhead •Email notifications to subscribers of the “Bicycle Transportation Plan” email list •Email notification to the Cupertino Block Leaders in the nearby surrounding neighborhoods The format of the meetings, as well as the project displays and the questions asked of the community, were the same at both meetings. Each meeting was open house style where participants were invited to arrive at any time during the event window and provide individual feedback on the trail project. Six stations were set up for participants to visit at their own pace. Station #1 was the welcome table, where participants were greeted by City staff and provided an input packet to record comments as they traveled between stations. The five remaining stations included: •Project background and goals and objectives (Station #2) •The three segments of the proposed trail (Stations #3, 4, 5) •Refreshments (Station #6) Participants were asked to return their input packets at Station #1 before leaving so that their comments could be recorded. The following summarizes input received for both meetings, including from input packets, flip charts, and comments applied onto the trail segment plans, enlargements, and sections. Input Packet The input packet included seven sections of questions, and was comprised of general questions, trail design alternative questions, and segment-specific questions. The following organizes the comments received from the public in the order they appear in the input packet. Multiple choice questions are summarized to show the percentage breakdown of the answers received. Questions that had an open ended answer include the individual comments received. I. General Background Question 1: Did you attend Community Meeting #1? Yes No 37% 63% Question 2: Do you support a trail at this location? Yes No 62% 38% Question 3: How would you use the trail? (circle all that apply) Biking Jogging Walking Commuting Other 40% 10% 33% 4% 13% Answers under “Other” include: •Would not use it •Not at all •Not at all! 420 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study124Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 3 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Wouldn’t use it! •Not •To walk to restaurants and stores •To shops and restaurants Question 4: Do you live or work in Cupertino? Live Work Live and Work Do not Live or Work 77% 0% 14% 9% II. Trail Design Question 1: Which alternative do you prefer? Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Neither 16% 55% 29% Question 2: What factors impact your decision in selecting a trail alternative? •Cost: significantly more for alternative #2. Use: Alternative #1 will be used multi-use anyway. •Wider, multi-purpose, dream big - one time cost •Wider trail, safety that someone not going to fall in ditch. •Safety •Multi Use - Bike and Pedestrian •Safety, traffic, parking, noise, lack of privacy, Increase of strangers in the area •No bikes, lighting, noise, less privacy, security •Open Space. It would provide a better experience. •Impact of people and traffic •Aesthetics, Width-allows easier bike + pedestrian traffic •Separation from traffic •Allowing bicycles on the trail is vital in order for the trail to provide a good commuting alternative •Potential users; impact on privacy, security of residents along trail; reversibility; potential impact to water authority activities •More room for ped and bike •Trail width •I like the extra width provided by Alt #2, but I think Alt #1 would be much simpler and less expensive which will help it happen! Would particularly be concerned about limiting water flow or complicating maintenance when covering the ditch. Alt#2 also adds some additional green buffer to neighbors, but I don't think this will be a problem after it is constructed •Safety, security, noise impact, privacy for those houses impacted •This is the "aging of America" (I don't think this is being considered). The aged are not going to be riding bicycles (nor walking over bridges/trails) to get to their medical appointments or bring home groceries, etc. We have enough bicycle/access infiltrating our area, bringing in outsiders. These "designs" will impact the quiet enjoyment of our homes even more!! •Walking along a trail built right next to a major highway is not something of great appeal; physical and environmental safety concerns (i.e. fumes from many motor vehicles, noise) will 421 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 125Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 4 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. not be great appeal; Building and maintaining such a trail, built next to a major highway will be much more expensive? What is the projected cost? •The proposed trail would run directly behind my house, it would impact my privacy as well as increase the noise level •Safety of existing redwood trees along 280; presence of bikes and pedestrians on same trail - how safe? •For the second alternative, there is more space for people to commute to work, or go on a family walk. For people going to work, it is a longer commute by bike without the trail •It would be cosmetically nicer and it might keep out any random undesirable smells •I am concerned about security for property owners next to the trail. As is, there is graffiti on I- 280 sound wall •Multi-use trail more useful than narrow pedestrian only trail •It is wider, it looks nicer, there is more greenery •This is for Apple-only and don't care about us who live next to the trail •Consistent width, avoids falling in ditches, more visually appealing, avoids conflict with location on PG&E poles, especially in Station #4 area •Width! The wider trail is safer to allow pedestrians, bikes, skateboards, etc. Question 3: Do you live next to the trail? Yes No 58% 42% Question 4: Do you have children that would use the trail? Yes No Possibly in the Future 19% 72% 9% Station #3 (Trail Segment 1 – Mary Avenue to De Anza Boulevard) III. Mary Avenue Question 1: Which alternative do you prefer? Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Neither 6% 65% 29% Question 2: What factors impact your decision in selecting a trail alternative? •Wider, bike friendly •Do the right thing. If trail is not proper and wide it won't be usable and people won't use it. Having wider trail is right idea. •Safety •Multi Use, wider trail •Security, noise, lighting, privacy •Terrible proposal •Width of the trail being better for multiple uses - pedestrian and bicycles; plant a new tree or bush to replace tree removed. •Maintain trees along residences 422 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study126Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 5 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Slope is more natural and pleasing. In an emergency, trail users can leave the trail by climbing the slope; sharp easement feels walled in. •Security underpass area •Pleasant landscaping •Easier, cheaper, better •Again, making a choice for a simpler solution has a better chance of getting approved and built; I would encourage you to maintain as much natural screening as possible and NOT excavate more to create neighbor isolation; the perception of the negative is greater than the reality •Why can't the existing Mary Ave. bridge on-ramp be used to access trail? That will reduce the project costs. Alternative 2 is my second choice, do not support Alternative 1 •See former page [Trail Design] •Concerns over expense of such a project versus the benefit to public. Do not believe this project will have a great deal of appeal to most people •I am not in favor of either alternative especially because it will be right behind our house/property. This trail would be an invasion of my privacy. The foot and bike traffic would result in noise and debris left on the trail •Amount of water flowing in ditch •Alternative #2 is safer in certain situations since you can escape up the hillside (unless you have parkour skills, which most people don't). Also, if you are walking along the trail, if it is wider and next to a hillside, it would be nicer •It would be better for any animals living there, would look nicer and possibly cost less :) •Multi-use of bicycles •Wider, I ride my bike long distance, bike riders need a wider trail •Alleviates concerns with adjacent homes seems more scenic •Width to allow safer multi-use and to get it away from the residential area. Question 3: Would you use Mary Avenue Bridge to connect to this trail system? Yes No Maybe 35% 44% 21% Question 4: Do you have any additional comments about the Mary Avenue Trail access point? •Restroom, Water station, bench, camera, lighting, mile marker, safety patrol, website to promote •Putting water, parking spaces, lighting, maybe restrooms near parks is a good idea. •You should plan trail on 'storage' side at pedestrian bridge •Consider collaborating with residences to improve robustness of fences along trail •Amenities for bikers and walkers here please! Benches and congregating spaces here would be great (mini-park). Keep those away from the neighbors though •Concerns over effects and disruption to the local residents, especially over Alternative #1 •Have police on bike patrol at the Stelling undercrossing to deter loitering and theft and graffiti •Concerned w/ safety for trail users, particularly with potentially being in a secluded area out of plain sight, by the Loc-N-Stor •Safety - it seems secluded. Add mirrors for blind spots. 423 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 127Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 6 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. IV. Stelling Road Crossing Question 1: What type of crossing do you prefer? Grade-Separated Crossing Under Stelling Road with Spur Trail Access and No Crosswalk Across Stelling Road Crosswalk Across Stelling Road and No Grade- Separated Crossing under Stelling Road or Spur Trail Access Both a Grade-Separated Crossing Under Stelling Road with Spur Trail Access and a crosswalk Across Stelling Road 36% 8% 56% General Station #3 Question: Do you have any additional comments about the Station #3 trail segment? •This is heavy traffic area, option C is better. Least preferred choice is A. •Stelling is extremely busy at rush hour in morning and evening. A surface crosswalk would be a disaster •Not option B: will cause traffic backups on Stelling. Will cause safety issues. Also the bridge railing when traveling south on Stelling blocks sight line to the trail toward the west making it much less safe. •For biking on busy streets, like Stelling, separation is very important to induce casual/weekend bicyclists •Crosswalk good for pedestrian access and in case of flooding (?) •Traffic on Stelling is heavy and depends on events at De Anza College. A crosswalk is likely to be overlooked (note crosswalk near Quinlan); A Stelling Road entrance to the bike path is likely to influence and impact traffic on Stelling •Very noisy •Very clever solution, if possible and affordable •Both please! Don't know if Stelling will be a big turning point, the underpass path would obstruct people wanting to get on Stelling. The crosswalk support will be nominal in cost for the benefit •Apple employees have access to trail from campus and not on streets!!! •Security of undercrossing •A crosswalk across Stelling Road will make traffic on Stelling much worse than now. The traffic is bad enough now with traffic from Gardena Dr., Greenleaf, and the apartment complex feeding into Stelling. During peak hours, traffic can back into Hollenbeck in the north and all the way to Stevens Creek Blvd to the south •Both would be great, but any of the options seems workable •For long distance bike riders, it is much faster to have a grade-separated crossing, it is also safer •Very concerned about a crosswalk and the interaction with traffic - especially during school drop-off/pick-up and during rush hour •If you can't do #1C then do #1A. Do not do just 1B! Add mirrors for blind spots. 424 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study128Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 7 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Station #4 (Trail Segment 2 –De Anza Boulevard to Vallco Center) V. De Anza Boulevard Crossing Question 1: What type of crossing do you prefer? Bridge Over-Crossing with Crosswalk Across De Anza Boulevard Tunnel Under-Crossing with Crosswalk Across De Anza Boulevard No Grade-Separated Crossing and Maintain Existing Crosswalk Across De Anza Boulevard 43% 50% 7% Two people who voted for the bridge option said either the tunnel or bridge option would be fine. Question 2: Would you support removal of the existing crosswalk across De Anza Boulevard if the bridge of tunnel grade-separated crossing was provided? Yes No Maybe 48% 21% 31% VI. Blaney Avenue / Lucille Avenue Question 1: Regarding trail access and amenities, which of the following do you support? Informal Trail Access and No Trailhead or Trail Amenities Single Trail Access Point and Trailhead with Limited Trail Amenities Multiple Trail Access Points and a Trailhead with Greater Level of Amenities 29% 32% 39% General Station #4 Question: Do you have any additional comments about the Station #4 trail segment? •Must have direct Apple access (infinite loop) to trail, to reduce bikes on Randy Ln/Larry Way. Limit access points to two: One east of Randy, (just far enough away from Apple to discourage parking) and one at Blaney. This grade-level proposal for crossing at Blaney is great. •Right next to my house. Privacy concerns. Live on Larry/Lucille. •Privacy, parking, traffic are concerns for residents of Lucille, Larry and Randy. 1: Consider wall to help with privacy. 2: Big no to any access points on Lucille Ave. •Not familiar with this section so no comment. •No trail access on Blaney/Lucille •Maintain fence - ideally make opaque for privacy. Make Lucille permitted parking M-F like Randy and Larry. Need frequent garbage clean up. Limited access - far from apple side to prevent parking problems. Maintain access under bridge for car traffic. Need police patrol for safety. •I support none of these. I live here and would be impacted. •Maintenance of trash can emptying would be very important •Multiple access points make the trail more usable for people living in the neighborhood, and would provide trail users route options •Informal trail access could serve as a pilot and could be upgraded if the trail use supports expansion •Some convenience but less cost •I prefer tunnel over bridge at De Anza mainly because of reduced elevation gain/loss; Use box culvert only when needed for trail width 425 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 129Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 8 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Mostly just need trailhead here; benches would be the only amenities needed •How is security mentioned? Security patrol? How about people using trail for "hanging out"? •Don't care… •As shown •Get Apple off the streets; safer alternatives for walkers/bikers; be mindful of neighborhood •Section east of Blaney - no soundwall; trail users protection form vehicles leaving the road •Provide access to Portal Ave. through CalWater site •I live next to the trail on Randy Lane; trail would cause such a problem for traffic and people, let alone criminal activity •Consider adding Trailhead/access point at the end of Lucille adjacent to the Apple campus. Work with Apple to create a linkage to Lawson Middle School along the edge of the Apple property, parallel to Larry Way, It would be nice to have some way to go directly from the trail up to the Blaney overpass. •Do not put the additional access points in the middle of Lucille. Trail amenities needed: a map of trail, a beach, mile markers, lighting. Extra security around the main entrance & under the bridge. There has been tagging & dumping (mattresses, etc) in this area. Keep the road (Lucille) open under the bridge. Do not close it. The neighborhood relies on it to get to Homestead without having to cross Blaney. Critical to AM/PM traffic flow & school traffic. VII. Vallco Center to Vallco Parkway General Station #5 Question: Do you have any additional comments about the Station #5 trail segment? •Keep Crossing at Wolfe not competing with cross traffic •This trail is for apple only. What a shame. •Be sure the contractor of Vallco includes space for bikeway •Perhaps stipulate that a proper multi-use trail along the south and east edges of hotel development be included in future development there. •The proposed path behind the new hotel is bad! It's still under construction - is there a way to create a path (or alternative path) that passes in front of hotel tracing Perimeter Road. •Nice •Have Vallco future pay for access to trail and out of neighborhood!!! Access to trail from Vallco itself not in neighborhood at all! •It is important to keep redwoods along 280 intact behind Hyatt House and property behind the old Macys. Will there be public creek trail along Calabazas Creek from 280 and Calabazas intersection to the Calabazas and Vallco Parkway intersection? One portion of the creek trail mentioned above along the small portion of Calabazas Creek should be both pedestrian and bike. •Provide easy access to hotel for residents and guests. Use CalWater area for access to Portal Ave. •East-west connectivity for bikes between Blaney and Tantau is important, especially with Pruneridge gone •Underpass is good •Make all sections of it as wide as possible to allow lots of multi-uses & improve safety. Add mirrors for blind spots & destination signs. 426 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study130Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 9 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. General Project Comments (end of input packet) •Great handout! Do this again. •Make it a world class trail. Heart of Silicon Valley must look good. Plant new trees. •Should be trail that represents Cupertino. Home of Apple. Best of best shall be created. •My property backs up to the trail between Mary and Stelling. I currently see the trail used by PG&E. My concerns are: 1. liability - I have tall trees that have dropped branches on the trail. 2. Safety - giving easier access to my back yard. 3. Privacy - I have no fence (just chain link). I am not against the bike/ped path, just want my concerns addressed. •This part of Cupertino has been impacted enough by the freeway, the schools, Apple and it's employees. •We are very worried about safety, security, privacy. Homestead high school kids jumping the fence (which they do), homeless, smokers, drugs and nuisance. •It's a shame that Apple can cause such a project to be contemplated that would impact the residents of this area. •I support alternate #2 for Mary to De Anza Blvd. •Very supportive. Good luck! •Please, please build it! This trail would remove a lot of local commuting traffic off the roads (Apple employees between campuses, students to De Anza college…) and provide a great off- street recreational alternative within the city (jogger, dog walkers...). Provide trash cans along trail : dog walkers; drinking fountains at trail ends would be great bonus •Consider if paving is necessary. No lights - encourage dawn to dusk use; Consider Alternative #1 as a pilot which could be expanded if use of trail becomes high. •Seems like there needs to be more thought about intermediate access points. The major points are too far apart. While I favor choices that reduce cost and complexity, I would encourage setting standards for trail width - there are too many narrow pinch points identified already. Please spend the money to widen where needed. •I am extremely concerned about safety, privacy, and noise issues. Currently, we have a lot of people hanging out at 2am during summer nights at the Mary Avenue Bridge trail head, located directly behind my house. 1) I am extremely concerned this trail will add to the noise we experience. 2) Make sure security is enforced after dusk (when officers are not busy with school patrolling). We already clean up broken glass bottles in our yards. 3) We are concerned about any trash, debris items that can be thrown over the fence into our backyards. 4) Can existing bike bridge be used to access 280 per alternative #2 near Mary Avenue? This would perhaps reduce capital costs. •All-in-all, do not think this to be a very worthwhile project. Probably very expensive and lacking in widespread appeal. Walkers, joggers, or cycling along trail next to major highway not very appealing, especially at times of rush-hour traffic. •I am totally opposed to the construction of the trail •Super •Very good graphics and presentation of trail options. Please keep the redwood trees along 280 •Really make sure Apple campus 1 and 2 have good connection to path •Please think about possibly separating bikers and pedestrians if the trail becomes crowded, in the future •Why do I and my neighbors have to suffer because the city can't say no to Apple 427 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 131Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 10 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Mile Markers (1/4 mile markers), security cameras in key areas and convex mirrors for blind corners, all for safety. Please make an effort to tie into the new signage style proposed for the City's Bike Boulevards, including "destination" signs indicating what is near the access points. Post a 25 mph speed limit (or less). Allow E-bikes with 25 mph max speed. Prohibit other motorized vehicles (gas, diesel, etc.). I LIKE HAVING A CROSS-TOWN CONNECTION OFF OF THE BUSY STREET LIKE STEVENS CREEK •When it opens, safety & security has to be very good to "set the tone" of the project. If people think it is not safe they won't use it or let their kids use it. Prevent Apple bikes from riding 2-3-4 across & taking over the path like we currently see them, do on our neighborhood streets like Vista Drive. (Comments provided via email after both community meetings) •After briefly reviewing the online story boards, I believe that accompanying trail construction, permit parking must be extended to the entirety of Lucille between Blaney and Apple. Lucille already has the occasional Apple employee parking and is used daily for Employees to smoke at the cul de sac at Apple. The neighborhood is permit parking because of the Apple overflow, and active vehicle commuters on Lucille is inconsistent with the trail’s use for the three schools nearby. Also, if smoking is not allowed on the trail, then it somehow should be restricted in the neighborhood. Apple doesn’t allow smoking on their campus, and if they think the trail bordering their property is also non-smoking, they will be driving smokers into the neighborhood which is unacceptable. We already have employees parking on Lucille then coming back to the area to smoke during breaks. •I just learned about a potential bike path along the Junipero Serra Channel. This is exciting, as it would give bicycles a protected way to get from Mary to Tantau. Currently, if you're near 280, you need to go to Homestead or Stevens Creek to go between Blaney and Wolfe. This change would encourage more bicycling, getting even more cars off the roadways. Hope you find some common ground with the water district and Caltrans to get this done. Of course, it would be great if the road crossings weren't at grade, but I'll leave that to the experts. Flip Charts Flip Charts were placed at Station #2 and each of the three trail segment stations (Stations #3, 4, 5). Flip charts did not include a prompted question, all feedback provided was open-ended. Not all Stations with flip charts received comments. Project Background And Goals and Objectives – Station 2: •Goal 4 - Have the trail access along I-280 be strictly for bike traffic. That way bike riders can travel at a faster speed. This would be good for people commuting on bikes between Apple Campus (Sunnyvale) and Apple Campus 2 (Tantau). •If pedestrian and bikes are on the same trial, the bikes need to go slower and pedestrians need to understand how to go on a trail with bikes Trail Segment 1 – Station 3: •Safety, security #1 issue. Graffiti already there. Had a burglary. •Connect to Stevens Creek Trail to the west? 428 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study132Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 11 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Trail on north side of 280 •No monitoring of ex. Plaza. Needs monitoring. Use cameras. •Concern about beacon crossing stopping traffic on Stelling. Concern about safety. Low visibility southbound. •Do a soundwall for safety and privacy. •Light for night use. •Amenities, drinking fountains, seating, "dream big" •Security cameras at problem/key areas. •Traffic stacks at Stelling. Trail Segment 2 – Station 4: •Concerns at Lucille Trailhead: •Safety •Parking (unwanted!) •Traffic •Increase of activity (peds/bikes/crime) •Apple employees (this project is for Apple only) Trail Segment 3 – Station 5: •No e-bikes (more than 25 mph) •No motorized •Allow e-bikes, speed < 25 mph Trail Segment Plans Trail segment plans were placed at each of the three trail segment stations. Participants were invited to draw and write on each plan to provide feedback for each trail segment. Trail Segment 1 – Station 3: •Concern over liability of trees dropping branches •Graffiti •Privacy & security •Stats on crime - how will police monitor •Parking will be issue •Leave redwoods •Why paved? Leave gravel •No lights •Homeless, privacy, security •Alt 2 viable? •Do we need a trail? Is demand there? For Apple employees? 429 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 133Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 12 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Trail Segment 2 – Station 4: •Blaney avenue: don't block •Blaney impacted by traffic •Concern bringing kids through an already congested area. •Keep fence to prohibit access from Lucille •Drive kids to school due to speeding cars •One access point may be ok •No sidewalk •Lucille not under some parking permit. Needs to be included in permit program •Will trail encourage parking on Lucille? •Lots of Apple bikes •Can you provide access here? For Lawson & Apple •Need access to Apple to Trail •Two access points •Speeding traffic to school •Use mirrors for blind spots •Call boxes along trail. Emergency. •Bike runnels at stairs? •Can we have police cameras on the trail •Consider security of users in tunnel crossing •Access for Apple employees to trail & the streets •Would not preclude Alt 2 in the future •Look @ stair channels Trail Segment 3 – Station 5: •Access for Guests & Visitors Trail Enlargements/Sections Mary Avenue Bridge •Pedestrian Trail: concern about buffering Stelling Road Crossing •Would people loiter here? Sheriffs need to patrol trail. Presence. •Heavy traffic on Stelling Rd •Lights in ground too •No loitering Blaney Avenue / Lucille Avenue •Might not be feasible •Moving trucks double park and isn't safe •Shift road to enable consistent class I 430 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study134Appendix Community Meeting #2 Summary Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #2a and 2b February 20 and 26, 2018 Page 13 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#2_180226.docx © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Prohibit access in this area...not safe •Add mirrors •Redwood trees @ curb •Trash & homeless •Cut through lots of trash •Hiding spot under bridge •Homeless living in ex tunnel •Taggers •Can you put a sidewalk here? •Parking concerns •Safety - can you have call boxes? Mile markers •Car theft (Lucille ave) •Consider alternative fencing - that provides features of existing chainlink (e.g. animal/pedestrian control) -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If you have any questions, additions, or corrections to this memo, please contact this office in writing within three days. Submitted by: Dave Rubin, Project Manager, Callander Associates cc: All attendees Attachments: 1.Input Packet Response Data Presentation 2.Meeting notification material 431 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 135Appendix this page intentionally left blank 432 SAN MATEO SAN JOSE RANCHO CORDOVA Recreate 311 Seventh Avenue 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate San Mateo, CA 94401 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email Only June 18, 2018 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meeting #3 Location: Cupertino Civic Center, Community Hall Date: June 6, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Total number of people who signed-in: 19 Total number of people who turned-in an input packet: 13 Attendees: City of Cupertino (City): Jennifer Chu (JC), Public Works, jenniferc@cupertino.org David Stillman (DS), Public Works, davids@cupertino.org Santa Clara County Sergeant Jason Brown (JB), jason.brown@shf.sccgov.org Sheriff’s Office: Callander Associates (CA): Brian Fletcher (BF), bfletcher@callanderassociates.com Dave Rubin (DR), drubin@callanderassociates.com Kelly Kong (KK), kkong@callanderassociates.com Community members were notified about the event through the following methods (refer to the end of the report for example outreach materials): •City’s website •City Channel •Social media (Next Door, Facebook, Twitter) •Tabling/flyer distribution at the Fall Festival, Diwali Festival, Fall Family Bike Fest •Flyer postings at the Library and City Hall •Door hangers and flyers to residents/businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail extents •Safe Routes to School (SR2S) monthly newsletter •Postcard mailings to residents/businesses directly adjacent to the proposed trail extents including residents/businesses within 300 feet of a proposed trailhead •Email notifications to subscribers of the “Bicycle Transportation Plan” email list •Email notification to the Cupertino Block Leaders in the nearby surrounding neighborhoods Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study136Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 433 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 2 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. The format of the meeting was an open house style where participants were invited to arrive at any time during the event window and provide individual feedback on the trail project. Sergeant Brown was present to address concerns about safety and security along the potential trail. Six stations were set up for participants to visit at their own pace. Station #1 was the welcome table, where participants were greeted by City staff and provided a questionnaire to record comments as they traveled between stations. The five remaining stations included: •Project background and goals and objectives (Station #2) •The three segments of the proposed trail (Stations #3, 4, 5) •Refreshments (Station #6) Participants were asked to return their questionnaire at Station #1 before leaving so that their comments could be recorded. The following summarizes input received at and after the meeting, including from questionnaires, flip charts, comments written onto the trail segment plans, enlargements, sections, and follow-up e-mails. Questionnaire The questionnaire included two sections of questions and was comprised of general questions and more specific input. The following organizes the comments received from the public in the order they appear in the questionnaire. Multiple choice questions are summarized to show the percentage breakdown of the answers received. Questions that had an open-ended answer include the individual comments received. I. General Background Question 1: Did you attend Community Meeting #1 or Community Meeting #2? Only #1 Only #2 Both #1 and #2 Neither 8% 17% 17% 58% Written Comment: •#1 or #2 Question 2: Do you support a trail at this location? Yes No 75% 25% Written Comment: •Maybe only if its Alternative #2 on Mary Question 3: How would you use the trail? (circle all that apply) Biking Jogging Walking Commuting Other 21% 21% 53% 0% 5% Answers under “Other” include: •Getting around town! Question 4: Do you live or work in Cupertino? Live Work Live and Work Do not Live or Work 50% 0% 50% 0% Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 137Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 434 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 3 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. II. Input Question 1: What aspects of the trail design do you like? What do you like about the proposed trail? •Very nicely done. •The bridge concept. Definitely is superior in my opinion. Aspects of safety, aesthetics, cost etc. are best. I totally don’t like the tunnel concept. Not good for safety, cost, etc. •Thank you for listening to people’s comments. •It’s a trail, where neighbor kids can ride/scooter/run safely. It’s an off-street cross route for the non-motorized. If there’s a problem with homeless encampment, it would probably help. •In Alt 2 I like the buffer of increased space = plantings to have trail impact residents less. I like how this would connect Apple’s campus making biking easier & safer between campus. Like the idea of walking trail. •Connect Apple to Apple relieving city streets of dangerous bikes. Safer bike/vehicle separation is preferred. Trail option #2 east of De Anza is the only acceptable option. •Enclosed culvert with trail on top. Undercrossing at De Anza and Stelling (and Wolfe). At Mary, prefer trail NOT adjacent to home (Alt 2) •Under grade coming at Stelling bridge at De Anza Blvd •The design where the trail sits on top of the drainage Question 2: How can the proposed trail be improved? •Don’t like the current plans for De Anza Blvd. Overcrossing or undercrossing. •A beautiful designed bridge is the ideal. •Mitigation for encroaching homeless and crime. •Can’t think of anything in particular. The consultants have some good ideas, albeit expensive. •Add lighting. Lighting that does not impact homes, but low enough to highlight misuse during darkness. Trail heads official physical closure from dawn to dusk. Need more parking at trailhead on Mary. It’s not realistic to say that people won’t park at the trailhead. •More parking would be needed at trailheads. Trail needs official closure from Sherriff’s office and needs to be actively enforced. Lighting needs to be added. It should be low profile as to not cause light pollution onto resident homes. •Apple employees who will use this trail need access from their own campus to get on trail. Having them come down onto the neighborhood to access trail is unacceptable to Linwood Acres residents. No access point at end of Randy. Too many bikes – pedestrians at this busy Apple school neighborhood. •Vehicle barrier between Blaney overpass and Wolfe = dangerously close pedestrian/homeless access to freeway and trail. As proposed no grade or vertical barrier protecting path. •Add the access from N Portal along Calwater Property. Add access on Apple side of wall adjacent to homes on Larry way with a spur to Lawson Middle School. Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study138Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 435 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 4 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •It good enough •Mary Ave @ Bridge: prefer Alt #2 because it’s away from residents and allows trail users to get on bridge faster. Blaney Ave Intersection – prefer Alt #2 because the width can be 12’ fixed rather than varying, there’s more plantings bordering Lucille to buffer sound of freeway and trail users, safer for all users because it will be wider. •Remove all access points on Lucille except one by the Blaney overpass bridge and one at the other end of Lucille at the cul de sac. •It is critical to have an access point to this trail from Apple Infinity Loop to get Apple employees off the streets and encourage them to use the trail. •Negotiate a spur from the trail to Lawson Middle School on the Apple side of the wall bordering residents on Larry Way. Question 3: Do you have any other comments about the project? •It is nice you can plan this even when we don’t know what will happen at Vallco. •I do not like the trail across De Anza Blvd. I live in the condominium at the SW corner of 280 and De Anza. Very impressed with the crew here on 3rd community night. •What is the upside for homeowners along Gardena and Mary? The trail will bring security and privacy invasions with no apparent benefit to these residents. Reevaluate necessity with existing bike boulevards. •The wider you can make the path the safer it will be because bikes, peds, strollers, skateboard, dogs, etc. will use it. Wider means fewer collisions. •Good work with it! •Is this a project that will be put up for a vote by the community or does the community not have a say? Gardena Drive will become even more dangerous with a greater influx of commuters commuting to the start of the trailhead on Mary. •This project should be put to an official vote. It negatively impacts several residents while benefitting mostly Apple employees that want to bike to work. These meetings are tough to make it to when you work outside of Cupertino. Every neighbor that I have personally talks to is very against this project. I reside on the proposed trail path. •Prefer Alternative 2 – Why is Apple not yet involved as this literally will connect its 2 campuses? Prefer lots of trees where the trail impacts neighborhoods to mitigate noise, trash impact. •The lack of detail between Randy and De Anza does not build public trust. A failure to document access to Apple from the North and East, which does not exist now, and which would have an immediate impact on neighborhood, is unacceptable. Apple controls its own fences, and without documenting city barrier intent, all that exists currently is Apple fence. •Keep going! Negotiate to have Apple access point to trail that does not require Apple bikes to ride through neighborhood streets to access trail. •Mary Avenue – Use Alt #2/Segment 1 – Use Alt #2 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 139Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 436 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 5 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Bridge over De Anza looks good •Alternative #1 on Mary is right behind our house. I strongly oppose it. It would impact our privacy, safety and potentially other issues such as more noise, obstructed views. If at all, Alternative #2 should be evaluated for this project and the only option. Please take the homeowners along the trail @ Mary in consideration & big negative impact it has with Alternative #1. •The proposed 8 ft fence (wood) maintenance should also be the City’s responsibility. Control area bike use should also be established which is not evident in the I-280 overpass. •Mary Ave @ Bridge – prefer Alt #2 because its away from residents & allows trail users to get on bridge faster •Blaney Ave Intersection – prefer, Alt #2 because: 1.The width can be 12’ fixed rather than varying 2.There are more plantings bordering Lucille to buffer sound of freeway and trail users 3.Safer for all users because it will be wider •Remove all access points on Lucille expect one by the Blaney overpass bridge and one at the other end of Lucille at the cul-de-sac •It is critical to have an access point to this trail from Apple Infinity Loop to get Apple employees off the streets and encourage them to the trail •Negotiate a spur from the trail to Lawson Middle School on the Apple side of the wall bordering residents on Larry Way Alternative Alignment Plan: Alternative Alignment plans were placed at each of the three trail segment stations. Participants were invited to draw and write on each plan to provide feedback for each trail segment. •Conduct sensibility of parking for those who will drive to Mary entrance •Privacy and security concern for residents along path •Consider mitigation for crime during non-use hours •No tunnel – feels unsafe •No at-grade crossing – most dangerous •Trail safety critical for everyone •Apple access point? Connect to Apple Park campus. •Blaney: homeless •Blaney intersection: wall? What We Heard: What We Heard boards were placed at stations 2 through 5. Participants were invited to draw and write on each board to provide comments on what we heard from previous meetings. •Alternative #1 too close to fence. No privacy. Alt #2 •Like’s Alt #2 @ Mary. Less impact to privacy. •Establish rules of the road. Prepare a document explaining how shared use trail works. Public outreach. Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study140Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 437 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 6 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •Series of public presentations in the City Hall to discuss proper trail etiquette. This means what type of behavior is expected of pedestrians and bicyclists on the Loop Trail. Flip Charts Flip Charts were placed at stations 2 through 5. Participants were invited to draw and write on each flip chart to provide feedback for each station where there was a flip chart. Bike path across De Anza Blvd. (Sunnyvale – Saratoga): •Issue with the bike bridge over Sunnyvale – Saratoga Ave. This is a good idea, but it is visual clutter and makes the whole area look like the middle of a big freeway going over Sunnyvale – Saratoga Rd. This design detracts from the beauty of the Apple I campus and the trees and the other buildings. Too much clutter. •On other view of having an underground tunnel in lieu of the bike bridge over Sunnyvale – Saratoga Avenue, the current tunnel as presented is dark and scarey [sic] and looks like it would not be safe to walk in. There could be pick-pockets and purse snatchers. There is too much enclosed area in the tunnel and as a woman I would not feel safe walking or bicycling in that dark tunnel with no one else around. •Can you come up with a better plan? •Underground is good, but currently it is too dark and scarey [sic] and unsafe. •Remove multiple access points on Lucille and keep only one at Blaney overpass and one at Apple parking lot corner (possibly open on both Apple and Lucille sides) •Negotiate with Apple to add a spur along edge of parking lot adjacent to homes on Larry Way to provide off street parking access to Lawson Middle School and Apple employees •Homelessness concern: What mitigations will be taken if homelessness does become a problem after the trail is built? •Connections Map: Show access points to trail! Trail Enlargements/Sections Trail Enlargements and Sections were placed at each of the three trail segment stations. Participants were invited to draw and write on each plan to provide feedback for each trail segment. Blaney Avenue / Lucille Avenue •Apple access is very important •Would rather have parking •Flashing beacon •Can a flashing sign be put here to alert cars of peds? •Trash concerns •Keep existing redwoods and water valve & existing boxes •New landscape •Informal trail •Lots of litter Stelling Rd Under Crossing: Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 141Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 438 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 7 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. •More solid @ bottom of fence •Deterrent to potential homeless camp •Close •Signage for cyclists Community E-mails Some community members who were not able to attend the community meeting sent Jennifer comments about the project via e-mail. E-mail #1: Jennifer, It was good meeting with you during last meeting in this topic. I won't be in town to participate in person. As expressed during our meeting I am reiterating my points, 1. Our primary stance is "complete No- No for this initiative." The reason is we are very seriously concerned with Security, privacy as well Our safety. In addition, unknown people hanging around and noise are concerns as well. I had expressed similar concerns during Mary avenue bridge. City officials were deaf to our concerns. We continue to suffer from late night noise, some illegal acts, unknowns hanging around in the area between our backyard and empty area off Bridge. 2. However if city officials still continue to take same stance ( as in the past )and build a trail, here are options, 1. Trail will be used only for walking/ Jogging. 2. No bike access / Skate boarders. 3. Strict access control to Homestead high students. 4. City officials Meeting with neighbors every quarter for any concerns. I also insist on following, 1. We need 10 feet solid wood fence to be built. This will be maintained and managed by city. 2. No access to trail after 7 pm till 7 am. 3. More cops and police to monitor trail access and faster response in case of any issues or concerns. 4. 24x7, monitoring Cameras to be installed at the trail entrance. Alarms in case of access after 7 PM till 7 AM. 5. Strict control policy on noise level. Currently we have several days the year people hanging around bridge area making loud noises, chatting which goes on till late night. Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study142Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 439 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 8 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Lastly, we need guarantee from city on our safety, security concerns are, if not a firm commitment from city and owning responsibility for any issues / concerns arising from such incidences as well being legally liable. Please ensure our concerns and voice is heard clear and loud in any further planning. Thank you, ”Name Omitted for Privacy” E-mail #2: Dear Jennifer, As 20+ year residents of Cupertino, we would like to voice our support for the Junipero Serra bike trail. ”Name Omitted for Privacy” -END- The information above is Callander Associates’ understanding of items discussed and decisions reached at the meeting. Callander Associates is proceeding with the project based on this understanding. If you have any questions, additions, or corrections to this memo, please contact this office in writing within three days. Submitted by: Dave Rubin, Project Manager, Callander Associates cc: File Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 143Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 440 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 9 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Pictures of Community Meeting #3 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study144Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 441 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 11 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Door Hanger: Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 145Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 442 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 12 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Door Hanger for Residents Around Portal Avenue: Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study146Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 443 Meeting Summary Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study RE: Community Meetings #3 June 6, 2018 Page 13 of 13 17056_SUM_CommMtg#3_180606.docx © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Meeting Postcard: (Front of Postcard) (Back of Postcard) Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 147Appendix Community Meeting #3 Summary 444 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study148Appendix Outreach Materials - City Flier 445 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 149Appendix Outreach Materials - City Postcard 446 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study150Appendix Outreach Materials - City Door Hanger 447 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 151Appendix Outreach Materials - City Door Hanger for Portal Ave Residents 448 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study152Appendix Outreach Materials - Hand Out 449 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 153 Apple R.O.W. Aquisition Exhibit 450 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study154 this page intentionally left blank 451 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 155Appendix Sandis - Box Culvert E-mail Jana Schwartz <j.schwartz@callanderassociates.com> Box Culvert Information - Junipero Serra Trail 1 message David Rubin <drubin@callanderassociates.com>Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:07 PM To: Jennifer Chu <JenniferC@cupertino.org>, David Stillman <DavidS@cupertino.org> Cc: Jana Schwartz <jschwartz@callanderassociates.com>, Brian Fletcher <bfletcher@callanderassociates.com> Jenn/David, I wanted to follow up on your questions yesterday regarding the box culvert. I was able to connect with Sandis and get some additional information. Below is the email from Jenner Phillips at Sandis regarding sizing of the culvert. Also, attached to this email are Caltrans details for box culverts, similar to what we'd propose here. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I suspect the channel was designed for the full build-out condition as well as to accommodate the 100-yr storm. Assuming everything from Stevens Creek Blvd flows north into the channel, I roughly calculate a 100-yr flow rate of 1329 cu-ft/sec. This is based on a composite run-off coefficient of 0.64 for a drainage area of 940 acres. I then compared that to the flow capacities of different parts of the channel. The box culvert (10ft wide x 6ft tall) just before the naturalized channel at Wolfe has a roughly calculated capacity of approximately 1340 cu-ft/sec. Based on our conversations to cover the culvert to gain more space for the path, I think a good option might be to replace the trapezoidal channel with a box culvert where the top of the culvert could be the top of the path (or at least a part of the path) with direct manhole access for maintenance personnel. The following segments of could be changed per the following: Mary to Stelling – 4’x4’ Box Culvert; Stelling to De Anza – 8’x5’ Box Culvert; De Anza to Wolfe – 10’x6’ Box Culvert; Wolfe to Calabazas Creek – Remain Unlined Trapezoidal. The unlined channel will very likely have to remain unlined. I doubt the Waterboards will allow a naturalized channel to be paved. They actively try to do the reverse. Drain inlets should be installed along the length to allow surface water to flow in and culvert water to flow out if the channel floods. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional information regarding access and maintenance: Q: How is culvert accessed and how far apart are access points? A: Can cast the manhole access flush with the top of the culvert or add a riser if there is fill above. Typically manholes are either 300 or 400 ft apart. It depends on maintenance preferences and costs. Either end of the culvert will need bars or something to restrict access. Q: How big are the access locations? A: Typical 2' manhole access. Q: What kind of equipment is needed to maintain culvert? A: Smaller sections probably need to be flushed clean similar to circular pipe sections, larger sections could allow a crew inside with equipment (power washers, brooms, shovels, etc…). The box culverts are designed to handle H-20 loading Lastly, alternative #2 means converting 10,100 linear feet of ditch from Mary Ave. to Wolfe Rd to box culvert (or about 1.91 miles). The last section east of Wolfe would remain unlined as it is today. I hope this helps and please let me know if you need anything else regarding the culverts. Thanks, 452 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study156Appendix this page intentionally left blank 453 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 157 Sandis - CalTrans Box Culvert Notes 454 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study158 this page intentionally left blank 455 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 159 Sandis - CalTrans Box Culvert Notes 456 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study160 this page intentionally left blank 457 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 161 Sandis - De Anza Blvd Overhead Wires Survey 458 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study162 this page intentionally left blank 459 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 163Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #1 Input Packet 17056_CommunityMeeting#1CommentHandout.indd December 6, 2017 • Travel to each of the stations and provide your input • Enjoy the refreshments • Ask us lots of questions Junipero Serra Trail December 6, 2017 How would you use this trail? Circle all that apply. Walking/Jogging/Biking Commuting to Work Taking children to school None of the above 1. 2. 3. 4. How often do you currently use a trail system elsewhere? Circle one. Never Once a year Once a month Once a week More than once a week 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Regarding trail development, what’s most important to you? Circle all that apply. Safety and security Trail access Trail amenities Connections to other bike and pedestrian facilities Other: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Community Meeting #1 Welcome! How to get started Tell us what you think 460 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study164Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #1 Input Packet December 6, 2017Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #1 Available Width, less than 14’-0” (does not meet class 1 multi-use standards) City Limits Available Width, 14’-0” minimum (meets class 1 multi-use standards) Trail Connection Point Existing Conditions Land Uses Near Proposed Trail Area Heart of the City Specific Plan Area Public Building (BA) Quasi-Public Building (BQ) / Mini Stor General Commercial (CG) Office/Planned Office (OA/OP) Residential Duplex (R2) / Mini-Stor Agricultural Residential (A1) Regional Shopping / Hotel HE Priority Housing Sites (Housing Element) (BA) (CG, ML) (BA) (BQ, Mini-Stor) *residential zoning is not shown Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike Route Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Overhead Utilities Gateway Class 1 Bike Path Light Industrial (ML) / Planned Industrial Zone (MP) (BA) (BQ) THE LOOPCupertino 0 50 100 200 17056_SiteAnalysis.indd Junipero Serra Creek Trail - Site Analysis HOMESTEAD HIGH SCHOOL GARDEN GATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mary Avenue Bridge MARY AVENUESTELLING ROADI-280 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 STATION #3 - Mary Ave to De Anza Blvd What do you like about this segment of the trail? What can be improved in this segment of the trail? Please rate this segment’s overall desirability: Please rate this segment’s suitability for the following activities: Low High 0 1 2 3 4 5 Low High 0 1 2 3 4 5 Commuting to work Walking/Jogging/Biking Going to school 461 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 165Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #1 Input Packet December 6, 2017Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #1 B(CG, ML, OA)(BQ) (R2, Mini-Stor) (A1) Available Width, less than 14’-0” (does not meet class 1 multi-use standards) City Limits Available Width, 14’-0” minimum (meets class 1 multi-use standards) Trail Connection Point Existing Conditions Land Uses Near Proposed Trail Area Heart of the City Specific Plan Area Public Building (BA) Quasi-Public Building (BQ) / Mini Stor General Commercial (CG) Office/Planned Office (OA/OP) Residential Duplex (R2) / Mini-Stor Agricultural Residential (A1) Regional Shopping / Hotel HE Priority Housing Sites (Housing Element) *residential zoning is not shown Bike Lanes on Street Bike Route Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Overhead Utilities Gateway 0 50 100 200 Existing Connections Class 1 Bike Path Light Industrial (ML) / Planned Industrial Zone (MP) (BQ) 17056_SiteAnalysis.indd THE LOOPCupertino Junipero Serra Creek Trail - Site Analysis APPLE LAWSON MIDDLE SCHOOL BLANEY AVENUEDE ANZA BOULEVARDI-280 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 STATION #4 - De Anza Blvd to Vallco Center What do you like about this segment of the trail? What can be improved in this segment of the trail? Please rate this segment’s overall desirability: Please rate this segment’s suitability for the following activities: Low High 0 1 2 3 4 5 Low High 0 1 2 3 4 5 Commuting to work Walking/Jogging/Biking Going to school 462 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study166Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #1 Input Packet December 6, 2017Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #1 HE HE (Regional Shopping) (Heart of the City Specific Plan Area) HE Enlargement Area - Hyatt House Hotel Bike/Ped Path Connection Available Width, less than 14’-0” (does not meet class 1 multi-use standards) City Limits Available Width, 14’-0” minimum (meets class 1 multi-use standards) Trail Connection Point Existing Conditions Land Uses Near Proposed Trail Area Heart of the City Specific Plan Area Public Building (BA) Quasi-Public Building (BQ) / Mini Stor General Commercial (CG) Light Industrial (ML) / Planned Industrial Zone (MP) Office/Planned Office (OA/OP) Residential Duplex (R2) / Mini-Stor Agricultural Residential (A1) Regional Shopping / Hotel HE Priority Housing Sites (Housing Element) *residential zoning is not shown Bike Lanes on Street Bike Route Class 1 Bike Path Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Overhead Utilities Gateway 0 50 100 200 Existing Connections (Hotel) 17056_SiteAnalysis.indd THE LOOPCupertino Junipero Serra Creek Trail - Site Analysis HYATT HOUSE HOTEL - CUPERTINO, CA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - AUGUST 13, 2014AADROP-OFF / ENTRY PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OUTDOOR DINING POOL EXISTING TREE SHADE TREE FLOWERING / SEASONAL TREE IN GRATE UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREE STREET TREE IN GRATE PUBLIC ART DECORATIVE PAVING BANDS (GRAVEL OR CONCRETE) PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK TRASH/RECYCLING BIN STORMWATER PLANTING ADA ACCESSAIBLE RAMP SCREENED TRANSFORMER LEGEND NORTH SCALE:1” = 20’-0” L-1 12 12 13 13 8 1 3 4 6 7 2 2 2 7 7 10 11 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 16 15 14 13 8 0’ 5’20’10’10’Aproposed calss IV separated bike lane as part of I-280/Wolfe Road interchange improvments green-backed bike lanes along N Tantau Ave. and Vallco Pkwy. see enlargement area connection to proposed trail hotel bicycle/pedestrian path CALABAZAS CREEKN TAN TAU AVENUE VALLC O P A R K W A YN WO L FE ROAD I-280 Vallco marquee sign P(MP) APPLE 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 33 32 3130292827 26 25 24 23 STATION #5 - Vallco Center to Vallco Pkwy What do you like about this segment of the trail? What can be improved in this segment of the trail? Please rate this segment’s overall desirability: Please rate this segment’s suitability for the following activities: Low High 0 1 2 3 4 5 Low High 0 1 2 3 4 5 Commuting to work Walking/Jogging/Biking Going to school 463 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 167Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet 17056_CommunityMeeting#2CommentHandout.indd February 20 and 26, 2018 • Travel to each of the stations and provide your input • Enjoy the refreshments • Ask us lots of questions Junipero Serra Trail February 20 and 26, 2018 1. Did you attend Community Meeting #1? Circle one. Yes No A. B. 3. How would you use the trail? Circle all that apply. Biking Jogging Walking Commuting Other: A. B. C. D. E. 4. Do you live or work in Cupertino? Circle one. I live in Cupertino I work in Cupertino I live and work in Cupertino I do not live or work in Cupertino A. B. C. D. Community Meeting #2 Welcome! How to get started I. General Background 2. Do you support a trail at this location? Circle one. Yes No A. B. 464 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study168Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 II. Trail Design 1. Which alternative do you prefer? Circle one. Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Neither A. B. C. 2. What factors impact your decision in selecting a trail alternative? Please provide your response below. 3. Do you live next to the trail? Circle one. Yes No A. B. THE LOOPCupertinoTrail Sections 17056_TrailSections.indd Public Service Easement City of Cupertino Width Varies 75’- 0” Existing Trail ResidentialCupertino Loc-N-Stor Slope Easement Cupertino Loc-N-StorPublic Service Easement City of Cupertino Width Varies 75’- 0”Slope Easement Existing Trail Residential 12’-0” 2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt TrailShoulder, Typ. 2’-0”2’-0” Pedestrian Trail Asphalt TrailShoulder, Typ. 10’-0” Alternative 2: Multi-Use Trail Along Loc-N-Stor Property With Minimal Grading To Adjacent Hillside Alternative 1: Pedestrian Trail With Reduced Trail Width To Pull Trail Away From Adjacent Residential Property. Significant Tree Removal and Grading Will Be Required. Existing Class 1 Multi-Use Trail SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies +- Public Storage 12’-0” 2’-0”2’-0” Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 Shoulder, Typ. Asphalt Trail 35’- 0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Existing Proposed Pedestrian Trail +- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies +- Public Storage Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 35’- 0” 9’- 0” 2’-0” Shoulder Public Storage Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 11’- 6”+- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies PG&E Transmission Lines Existing Trees 35- 0” PG&E Transmission Poll Existing Concrete Lined Drainage Ditch Existing Chainlink FenceASECTION A B SECTION B +- +- THE LOOPCupertino Trail Sections 17056_TrailSections.indd Public Service EasementCity of CupertinoWidth Varies 75’- 0”Existing Trail ResidentialCupertino Loc-N-StorSlope Easement Cupertino Loc-N-Stor Public Service Easement City of Cupertino Width Varies 75’- 0” Slope Easement Existing Trail Residential 12’-0” 2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt TrailShoulder, Typ. 2’-0”2’-0” Pedestrian Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. 10’-0” Alternative 2: Multi-Use Trail Along Loc-N-Stor Property With Minimal Grading To Adjacent Hillside Alternative 1: Pedestrian Trail With Reduced Trail Width To Pull Trail Away From Adjacent Residential Property. Significant Tree Removal and Grading Will Be Required. Existing Class 1 Multi-Use Trail SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies +- Public Storage 12’-0”2’-0”2’-0” Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 Shoulder, Typ. Asphalt Trail 35’- 0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Existing Proposed Pedestrian Trail +- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies +- Public Storage Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 35’- 0” 9’- 0” 2’-0” ShoulderPublic Storage Caltrans R.O.W.I-28011’- 6”+-SCVWD R.O.W.Width Varies PG&E Transmission Lines Existing Trees35- 0”PG&E Transmission PollExisting Concrete Lined Drainage DitchExisting Chainlink FenceASECTION A B SECTION B+- +- Alternative #1 Open Drainage Ditch, Pedestrian Trail Alternative #2 Covered Drainage Ditch, Class 1 Multi-UseTrail 4. Do you have children that would use this trail? Circle one. Yes No Possibly in the future A. B. C. 465 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 169Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 STATION #3 - Mary Avenue Trail Access THE LOOPCupertino Trail Sections 17056_TrailSections.indd Public Service Easement City of Cupertino Width Varies 75’- 0”Existing Trail ResidentialCupertino Loc-N-Stor Slope Easement Cupertino Loc-N-Stor Public Service Easement City of Cupertino Width Varies 75’- 0” Slope Easement Existing Trail Residential 12’-0”2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. 2’-0”2’-0” Pedestrian Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. 10’-0” Alternative 2: Multi-Use Trail Along Loc-N-Stor Property With Minimal Grading To Adjacent Hillside Alternative 1: Pedestrian Trail With Reduced Trail Width To Pull Trail Away From Adjacent Residential Property. Significant Tree Removal and Grading Will Be Required. Existing Class 1 Multi-Use Trail SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies +- Public Storage 12’-0” 2’-0”2’-0” Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 Shoulder, Typ. Asphalt Trail 35’- 0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Existing Proposed Pedestrian Trail +- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies +- Public Storage Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 35’- 0” 9’- 0” 2’-0” Shoulder Public Storage Caltrans R.O.W.I-28011’- 6”+-SCVWD R.O.W.Width Varies PG&E Transmission Lines Existing Trees35- 0”PG&E Transmission PollExisting Concrete Lined Drainage DitchExisting Chainlink FenceASECTION A B SECTION B+- +- Alternative #1 Pedestrian Trail Alternative #2 Class 1 Multi-Use Trail III. Mary Avenue 1. Which alternative do you prefer? Circle one. Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Neither A. B. C. 2. What factors impact your decision in selecting a trail alternative? Please provide your response below 3. Would you use Mary Avenue Bridge to connect to this trail system? Circle one. Yes No Maybe A. B. C. 4. Do you have any additional comments about the Mary Avenue Trail access point? 466 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study170Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 STATION #3 - Stelling RoadTHE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Auzerais Ave Stelling Road Intersection EnlargementStelling RoadInterstate 280 Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Barrier Railing, Typ. At-grade Higher Visibility Crosswalk Open Ditch Access Control Fence At Trail Edge Sloped Trail Undercrossing, <5% Running Slope, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Cross Sections = 16’ Wide Undercrossing Example Trailhead Plaza With Seating, Typ. HWY 85 Stevens Cree k T r a i l Middlefield Overhead 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Higher Visibility Crosswalk Example 30 MPH Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) 1. What crossing type do you prefer? Circle one. A grade-separated crossing under Stelling Road with spur trail access and no crosswalk across Stelling Road A crosswalk across Stelling Road with no grade-separated crossing under Stelling Road or spur trail access Both a grade-separated crossing and crosswalk across Stelling Road with spur trail access A. B. C. Do you have any additional comments about the Station #3 trail segment? Stelling Road Crossing Options IV. Stelling Road Crossing THE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Auzerais Ave Stelling Road Intersection EnlargementStelling RoadInterstate 280 Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Barrier Railing, Typ. At-grade Higher Visibility Crosswalk Open Ditch Access Control Fence At Trail Edge Sloped Trail Undercrossing, <5% Running Slope, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Cross Sections = 16’ Wide Undercrossing Example Trailhead Plaza With Seating, Typ. HWY 85 Stevens Cree k T r a i l Middlefield Overhead 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Higher Visibility Crosswalk Example 30 MPH Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) 467 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 171Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 STATION #4 - De Anza BoulevardTHE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Bicycle / Pedestrian Bridge Over-Crossing Examples De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement Bridge Over-CrossingDe Anza BoulevardInterstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide PG&E Tower To Remain Stairs to Bridge Over-Crossing, Typ. Bridge Approach Ramp, <5% Trailhead Plaza, Typ. Bridge Over-Crossing Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Bridge Approach Ramp, <5% Relocated PG&E Tower PG&E Tower To Be Removed Existing Property Fence, Apple Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) 40 MPH 1. What crossing type do you prefer? Circle one. Bridge over-crossing with crosswalk across De Anza Boulevard Tunnel under-crossing with crosswalk across De Anza Boulevard No grade-separated crossing and maintain existing crosswalk across De Anza Boulevard A. B. C. THE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Bicycle / Pedestrian Under-Crossing Examples Stevens Creek Trail Local Example: Stevens Creek Trail, Mountain View Under-Crossing Below El Camino Real With Center Skylight And LightingDe Anza BoulevardDe Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement Tunnel Under-Crossing 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Interstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p PG&E Tower To Be Removed Tunnel Under-Crossing With Skylight For Natural Lighting Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain Tunnel Approach Ramp Tunnel Approach Ramp Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide 40 MPH Reocated PG&E Tower on Caltrans R.O.W. Existing Property Fence, Apple Stairs to Tunnel Under-Crossing, Typ. Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) De Anza Boulevard Bridge Over-Crossing De Anza Boulevard Tunnel Under-Crossing V. De Anza Boulevard Crossing THE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Auzerais Ave Stelling Road Intersection EnlargementStelling RoadInterstate 280 Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Barrier Railing, Typ. At-grade Higher Visibility Crosswalk Open Ditch Access Control Fence At Trail Edge Sloped Trail Undercrossing, <5% Running Slope, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Cross Sections = 16’ Wide Undercrossing Example Trailhead Plaza With Seating, Typ. HWY 85 Stevens Cree k T r a i l Middlefield Overhead 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Higher Visibility Crosswalk Example 30 MPH Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered)THE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Auzerais Ave Stelling Road Intersection EnlargementStelling RoadInterstate 280 Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Barrier Railing, Typ. At-grade Higher Visibility Crosswalk Open Ditch Access Control Fence At Trail Edge Sloped Trail Undercrossing, <5% Running Slope, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Cross Sections = 16’ Wide Undercrossing Example Trailhead Plaza With Seating, Typ. HWY 85 Stevens Cree k T r a i l Middlefield Overhead 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Higher Visibility Crosswalk Example 30 MPH Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) 2. Would you support removal of the existing crosswalk across De Anza Boulevard if the bridge or tunnel grade-separated crossing was provided? Circle one. Yes No Maybe A. B. C. 468 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study172Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 STATION #4 - Blaney RoadTHE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements / Sections 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 C 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Interstate 280 Blaney AvenueRandy LaneVilla De Anza AvenueProposed Sidewalk To Meet Existing Sidewalk at Olivewood StreetMetal Beam Guardrail At Curve Existing Edge Of Street Proposed Curb Shift, 2’-0” approximately 10’ Width At Pinch Point Blaney Avenue Intersection Enlargement Alternative #1Existing SECTION C Alternative #2 City R.O.W.Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 18’- 6”+- SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 40’- 0” Existing Tree Existing Tree Existing Sound Wall PG&E Transmission Pole Lucille Avenue Existing Chainlink Fence Existing Concrete Lined Drainage Ditch PG&E Transmission Lines Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 40’- 0” Varies, 12’-0” Max.2’-0”2’-0” Pedestrian or Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. City R.O.W. Existing Tree To Remain Sound Wall To Remain Guardrail, 4’-6” Tall, Only Where Drop-Off Slope Exceeds 3:1 Concrete Lined Drainage Ditch To RemainLucille Avenue Existing Tree To Remain 3:1 Split-Rail Fence, 3’-0” Tall, With Openings Along Lucille Avenue For Trail Access PG&E Transmission Lines To Remain PG&E Transmission Pole To Remain Caltrans R.O.W. I-280 SCVWD R.O.W. Width Varies 40’- 0” 12’-0” 2’-0”2’-0” Class 1 Multi-Use Trail Asphalt Trail Shoulder, Typ. City R.O.W. Existing Tree To Remain Sound Wall To Remain Lucille Avenue Existing Tree To Remain Split-Rail Fence, 3’-0” Tall, With Openings Along Lucille Avenue For Trail Access Concrete Box Culvert PG&E Transmission Lines To Remain PG&E Transmission Pole To Remain Planted Stormwater Treatment Area Paved Trail Access Point Guy Anchor To Be Modified, Maintain Min. 10’ Vertical Clearance Over Trail Access manhole at 400’- 0”, typ. Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Trailhead Existing Tree To Remain, Typ.Landscaping, Typ. Existing On-street Parking Seatwall, Typ. Low Split Rail Fence, Typ. Wires Overhead, Typ. D.G. Path Connection, Typ. PG&E Tower, Typ. Proposed Crosswalk and Sidewalk With Ramps 25 MPH Lucille Avenue CEnlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) Do you have any comments about the Station #4 trail segment? VI. Blaney Avenue / Lucille Avenue Blaney Avenue with Trail Access on Lucille Avenue THE LOOPCupertino Trail Enlargements 17056_TrailEnlargements_V2.indd February 20/26, 2018 Auzerais Ave Stelling Road Intersection EnlargementStelling RoadInterstate 280 Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Ditch Barrier Railing, Typ. At-grade Higher Visibility Crosswalk Open Ditch Access Control Fence At Trail Edge Sloped Trail Undercrossing, <5% Running Slope, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, Cross Sections = 16’ Wide Undercrossing Example Trailhead Plaza With Seating, Typ. HWY 85 Stevens Cree k T r a i l Middlefield Overhead 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Higher Visibility Crosswalk Example 30 MPH Enlargement Legend Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Ditch (When Covered) 1. Regarding trail access and amenities, which of the following do you support? Circle one. Informal trail access and no trailhead or trail amenities at this location Single trail access point and trailhead with limited trail amenities at this location Multiple trail access points and a trailhead with greater level of amenities at this location A. B. C. 469 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 173Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 0 50 100 200 City Limits Trail Connection Point / Enlargement Area Existing Conditions Trail Types Bike Lanes on Street Existing Connections Bike Route Crosswalk Stop Sign Traffic Signal Gateway Class 1 Bike Path Covered Ditch, Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’-0” minimum Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’-0” minimum Pedestrian Trail, less than 16’-0” Alternative #2 Alternative #1 Standard 17056_AlternativeAlignmentPlan.indd THE LOOPCupertino Junipero Serra Trail - Alternative Alignment Plan CALABAZAS CREEK TAN TAU AV ENUE VALLC O P A R K W A YWOL F E ROAD I-280 Vallco marquee sign APPLE See Hyatt House Hotel Enlargement Vallco / I-280 Interchange Projects Class 1 Multi- Use Trail, 20’ Wide Public Trail Easement Potential Trailhead and Connection to Signalized Intersection DE STATION #5 - Vallco Center to Vallco Parkway Do you have any comments about the Station #5 trail segment? VII. Vallco Center to Vallco Parkway THE LOO P Cupertino Trail Enl a r g e m e n t s 17056_Tra il E n l a r g e m e n t s _ V 2 . i n d d February 2 0 / 2 6 , 2 0 1 8 Auzerais A v e Stelling R o a d I n t e r s e c ti o n E nl a r g e m e n tStelling RoadInterstate 2 8 0 Existing C a l t r a n s F e n c e T o R e m ai n Class 1 M ul ti - U s e T r ail, 1 6’ Wi d e Over Cov e r e d Di t c h West Trail S p u r , 10’ Wide East Trail S p u r, 10’ Wide Class 1 M ul ti - U s e T r ail, 1 6’ Wide Ove r C o v e r e d Di t c h Barrier Rai li n g, Typ. At-grade Hi g h e r Visibility C r o s s w al k Open Dit c h Access C o n t r o l F e n c e A t T r ail E d g e Sloped T r ail U n d e r c r o s si n g, < 5 % Running Sl o p e, Cl a s s 1 M ul t i - U s e Trail, Cro s s S e c ti o n s = 1 6’ Wi d e Undercro s si n g E x a m pl e Trailhead Pl a z a Wi t h Seating, T y p.HWY85Stevens Creek T r a i l Middlefie l d Overhead 0 1 5’ 3 0’ 6 0’ Higher Vi si bili t y C r o s s w al k E x a m pl e 30 MPH Enlargem e n t L e g e n d Primary V ol t a g e O v e r h e a d Seconda r y V ol t a g e O v e r h e a d Drainage Di t c h ( W h e n C o v e r e d) 470 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study174Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #2 Input Packet February 20 and 26, 2018Junipero Serra Trail | Community Meeting #2 Please return your packet to the sign-in table Thank you for your participation! Please join us again for: Community Meeting #3 Wednesday, June 6, 2018 6:00pm – 8:00pm Cupertino Community Hall 10350 Torre Ave, Cupertino, CA 95014 Do you have any other comments about the project? 471 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 175Appendix Input Handout - Community Meeting #3 Questionnaire 17056_CommMtg#3_Questionnaire.indd June 6, 2018 • Travel to each of the stations • Provide Input • Enjoy the refreshments • Ask us lots of questions Junipero Serra Trail 1. Did you attend Community Meeting #1 or Community Meeting #2? Circle one. Only, Community Meeting #1 Only, Community Meeting #2 Both, Community Meeting #1 and #2 Neither A. B. C. D. 3. How would you use the trail? Circle all that apply. Biking Jogging Walking Commuting Other: A. B. C. D. E. 4. Do you live or work in Cupertino? Circle one. I live in Cupertino I work in Cupertino I live and workin Cupertino I do not live orwork in Cupertino A. B. C. D. Community Meeting #3 - Questionnaire How to get started I. General Background II. Input 2. Do you support a trail at this location? Circle one. Yes No A. B. 1. What aspects of the trail design do you like? What do you like about the proposed trail? 2. How can the proposed trail be improved? 3. Do you have any other comments about the project? Please return this questionaire to the sign-in station. Thank you for your participation! June 6, 2018 472 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study176Appendix this page intentionally left blank 473 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 177 Input Board for Diwali Festival Pop-Up Booth THE LOOPCupertino Share Your Thoughts! 17056_AlternativesInputQuestions.indd April 21, 2018 Do you support a trail at this location? 1 Yes How would you use the trail? 3 Biking Jogging Walking Commuting Other No Do you live next to the trail? 2 Yes No Which trail alternative do you prefer? 4 Alternative #1 Alternative #2 At Stelling Road, what type of crossing do you prefer? 5 Crosswalk On Stelling Rd. At De Anza Boulevard, what type of crossing do you prefer? 6 Both Crossing Options Grade-Separated Crossing Under Stelling Rd. Bridge Crossing Over De Anza Blvd. Existing Crosswalk Across De Anza Blvd. Tunnel Crossing Under De Anza Blvd. 474 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study178 this page intentionally left blank 475 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 179Appendix Communtiy Meeting #3 Material - What we Heard Boards THE LOOPCupertino What We Heard 17056_WhatWeHeard_Comments.indd Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts • Cost: significantly more for alternative #2. Use: Alternative #1 will be used multi-use anyway. • Wider, multi-purpose, dream big - one time cost • Wider trail, safety that someone not going to fall in ditch. • Safety • Multi Use - Bike and Pedestrian • Safety, traffic, parking, noise, lack of privacy, Increase of strangers in the area • No bikes, lighting, noise, less privacy, security • Open Space. It would provide a better experience. • Impact of people and traffic • Aesthetics, Width-allows easier bike + pedestrian traffic • Separation from traffic • Allowing bicycles on the trail is vital in order for the trail to provide a good commuting alternative • Potential users; impact on privacy, security of residents along trail; reversibility; potential impact to water authority activities • More room for ped and bike • Trail width • I like the extra width provided by Alt #2, but I think Alt #1 would be much simpler and less expensive which will help it happen! Would particularly be concerned about limiting water flow or complicating maintenance when covering the ditch. Alt#2 also adds some additional green buffer to neighbors, but I don’t think this will be a problem after it is constructed • Safety, security, noise impact, privacy for those houses impacted • This is the “aging of America” (I don’t think this is being considered). The aged are not going to be riding bicycles (nor walking over bridges/trails) to get to their medical appointments or bring home groceries, etc. We have enough bicycle/access infiltrating our area, bringing in outsiders. These “designs” will impact the quiet enjoyment of our homes even more!! • Walking along a trail built right next to a major highway is not something of great appeal; physical and environmental safety concerns (i.e. fumes from many motor vehicles, noise) will not be great appeal; Building and maintaining such a trail, built next to a major highway will be much more expensive? What is the projected cost? • The proposed trail would run directly behind my house, it would impact my privacy as well as increase the noise level • Safety of existing redwood trees along 280; presence of bikes and pedestrians on same trail - how safe? • For the second alternative, there is more space for people to commute to work, or go on a family walk. For people going to work, it is a longer commute by bike without the trail • It would be cosmetically nicer and it might keep out any random undesirable smells • I am concerned about security for property owners next to the trail. As is, there is graffiti on I-280 sound wall • Multi-use trail more useful than narrow pedestrian only trail • It is wider, it looks nicer, there is more greenery • This is for Apple-only and don’t care about us who live next to the trail • Consistent width, avoids falling in ditches, more visually appealing, avoids conflict with location on PG&E poles, especially in Station #4 area • Width! The wider trail is safer to allow pedestrians, bikes, skateboards, etc. What factors impact your decision selecting a trail alternative? 16% 55% 29% #1 #2 Neither Which alternative do you prefer? Do you live next to the trail? Do you have children that would use the trail? 16% 55% 29% #1 #2 Neither 62% 38% Yes No 19% 72% 9% #1 #2 Possibly in the Future Community Meeting #1 Overall Input Community Meeting #2 Overall Input 26% 35%4% 35% 0% 1. Safety and security 2. Trail access 3. Trail amenities 4. Connections to other bike and pedestrian facilities 5. Other 26% 35%4% 35% 0% 1. Safety and security 2. Trail access 3. Trail amenities 4. Connections to other bike and pedestrian facilities 5. Other 8% 17% 0% 50% 25%1. Never 2. Once a year 3. Once a month 4. Once a week 5. More than once a week 8% 17% 0% 50% 25%1. Never 2. Once a year 3. Once a month 4. Once a week 5. More than once a week 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 Suitability for Commuting to Work 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 Overall Desirablility 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 Suitability for Going to School Suitability Going To SchoolSuitability For Commuting To WorkOverall Desirability TRAIL SEGMENT 1 TRAIL SEGMENT 2 TRAIL SEGMENT 3 0 1 2 3 4 5LOW HIGH How would you use this trail? 72% 14% 7% 7% 1. Walking/Jogging/Biking 2. Commuting to work 3. Taking children to school 4. None of the above 72% 14% 7% 7% 1. Walking/Jogging/Biking 2. Commuting to work 3. Taking children to school 4. None of the above How often do you currently use a trail system elsewhere? Regarding trail development, what’s most important to you? Circle all that apply. 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5# OF RESPONDENTS58% 42% Yes No Input Packet 476 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study180Appendix Communtiy Meeting #3 Material - What we Heard Boards THE LOOPCupertino What We Heard 17056_WhatWeHeard_Comments.indd Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts General Project Comments • Great handout! Do this again. • Make it a world class trail. Heart of Silicon Valley must look good. Plant new trees. • Should be trail that represents Cupertino. Home of Apple. Best of best shall be created. • My property backs up to the trail between Mary and Stelling. I currently see the trail used by PG&E. My concerns are: 1. liability - I have tall trees that have dropped branches on the trail. 2. Safety - giving easier access to my back yard. 3. Privacy - I have no fence (just chain link). I am not against the bike/ped path, just want my concerns addressed. • This part of Cupertino has been impacted enough by the freeway, the schools, Apple and it’s employees. • We are very worried about safety, security, privacy. Homestead high school kids jumping the fence (which they do), homeless, smokers, drugs and nuisance. • It’s a shame that Apple can cause such a project to be contemplated that would impact the residents of this area. • I support alternate #2 for Mary to De Anza Blvd. • Very supportive. Good luck! • Please, please build it! This trail would remove a lot of local commuting traffic off the roads (Apple employees between campuses, students to De Anza college…) and provide a great off-street recreational alternative within the city (jogger, dog walkers...). Provide trash cans along trail : dog walkers; drinking fountains at trail ends would be great bonus • Consider if paving is necessary. No lights - encourage dawn to dusk use; Consider Alternative #1 as a pilot which could be expanded if use of trail becomes high. • Seems like there needs to be more thought about intermediate access points. The major points are too far apart. While I favor choices that reduce cost and complexity, I would encourage setting standards for trail width - there are too many narrow pinch points identified already. Please spend the money to widen where needed. • I am extremely concerned about safety, privacy, and noise issues. Currently, we have a lot of people hanging out at 2am during summer nights at the Mary Avenue Bridge trail head, located directly behind my house. 1) I am extremely concerned this trail will add to the noise we experience. 2) Make sure security is enforced after dusk (when officers are not busy with school patrolling). We already clean up broken glass bottles in our yards. 3) We are concerned about any trash, debris items that can be thrown over the fence into our backyards. 4) Can existing bike bridge be used to access 280 per alternative #2 near Mary Avenue? This would perhaps reduce capital costs. • All-in-all, do not think this to be a very worthwhile project. Probably very expensive and lacking in widespread appeal. Walkers, joggers, or cycling along trail next to major highway not very appealing, especially at times of rush-hour traffic. • I am totally opposed to the construction of the trail • Super • Very good graphics and presentation of trail options. Please keep the redwood trees along 280 • Really make sure Apple campus 1 and 2 have good connection to path • Please think about possibly separating bikers and pedestrians if the trail becomes crowded, in the future • Why do I and my neighbors have to suffer because the city can’t say no to Apple • Mile Markers (1/4 mile markers), security cameras in key areas and convex mirrors for blind corners, all for safety. Please make an effort to tie into the new signage style proposed for the City’s Bike Boulevards, including “destination” signs indicating what is near the access points. Post a 25 mph speed limit (or less). Allow E-bikes with 25 mph max speed. Prohibit other motorized vehicles (gas, diesel, etc.). I LIKE HAVING A CROSS- TOWN CONNECTION OFF OF THE BUSY STREET LIKE STEVENS CREEK • When it opens, safety & security has to be very good to “set the tone” of the project. If people think it is not safe they won’t use it or let their kids use it. Prevent Apple bikes from riding 2-3-4 across & taking over the path like we currently see them, do on our neighborhood streets like Vista Drive. (Comments provided via email after both community meetings) • After briefly reviewing the online story boards, I believe that accompanying trail construction, permit parking must be extended to the entirety of Lucille between Blaney and Apple. Lucille already has the occasional Apple employee parking and is used daily for Employees to smoke at the cul de sac at Apple. The neighborhood is permit parking because of the Apple overflow, and active vehicle commuters on Lucille is inconsistent with the trail’s use for the three schools nearby. Also, if smoking is not allowed on the trail, then it somehow should be restricted in the neighborhood. Apple doesn’t allow smoking on their campus, and if they think the trail bordering their property is also non-smoking, they will be driving smokers into the neighborhood which is unacceptable. We already have employees parking on Lucille then coming back to the area to smoke during breaks. • I just learned about a potential bike path along the Junipero Serra Channel. This is exciting, as it would give bicycles a protected way to get from Mary to Tantau. Currently, if you’re near 280, you need to go to Homestead or Stevens Creek to go between Blaney and Wolfe. This change would encourage more bicycling, getting even more cars off the roadways. Hope you find some common ground with the water district and Caltrans to get this done. Of course, it would be great if the road crossings weren’t at grade, but I’ll leave that to the experts. Project Background, Goals and Objectives • Goal 4 - Have the trail access along I-280 be strictly for bike traffic. That way bike riders can travel at a faster speed. This would be good for people commuting on bikes between Apple Campus (Sunnyvale) and Apple Campus 2 (Tantau). • If pedestrian and bikes are on the same trial, the bikes need to go slower and pedestrians need to understand how to go on a trail with bikes Flip Chart Input Packet 477 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 181Appendix Communtiy Meeting #3 Material - What we Heard Boards THE LOOPCupertino What We Heard 17056_WhatWeHeard_Comments.indd • Wider, bike friendly • Do the right thing. If trail is not proper and wide it won’t be usable and people won’t use it. Having wider trail is right idea. • Safety • Multi Use, wider trail • Security, noise, lighting, privacy • Terrible proposal • Width of the trail being better for multiple uses - pedestrian and bicycles; plant a new tree or bush to replace tree removed. • Maintain trees along residences • Slope is more natural and pleasing. In an emergency, trail users can leave the trail by climbing the slope; sharp easement feels walled in. • Security underpass area • Pleasant landscaping • Easier, cheaper, better • Again, making a choice for a simpler solution has a better chance of getting approved and built; I would encourage you to maintain as much natural screening as possible and NOT excavate more to create neighbor isolation; the perception of the negative is greater than the reality • Why can’t the existing Mary Ave. bridge on-ramp be used to access trail? That will reduce the project costs. Alternative 2 is my second choice, do not support Alternative 1 • See former page [Trail Design] • Concerns over expense of such a project versus the benefit to public. Do not believe this project will have a great deal of appeal to most people • I am not in favor of either alternative especially because it will be right behind our house/property. This trail would be an invasion of my privacy. The foot and bike traffic would result in noise and debris left on the trail • Amount of water flowing in ditch • Alternative #2 is safer in certain situations since you can escape up the hillside (unless you have parkour skills, which most people don’t). Also, if you are walking along the trail, if it is wider and next to a hillside, it would be nicer • It would be better for any animals living there, would look nicer and possibly cost less :) • Multi-use of bicycles • Wider, I ride my bike long distance, bike riders need a wider trail • Alleviates concerns with adjacent homes seems more scenic • Width to allow safer multi-use and to get it away from the residential area. • Restroom, Water station, bench, camera, lighting, mile marker, safety patrol, website to promote • Putting water, parking spaces, lighting, maybe restrooms near parks is a good idea. • You should plan trail on ‘storage’ side at pedestrian bridge • Consider collaborating with residences to improve robustness of fences along trail • Amenities for bikers and walkers here please! Benches and congregating spaces here would be great (mini-park). Keep those away from the neighbors though • Concerns over effects and disruption to the local residents, especially over Alternative #1 • Have police on bike patrol at the Stelling undercrossing to deter loitering and theft and graffiti • Concerned w/ safety for trail users, particularly with potentially being in a secluded area out of plain sight, by the Loc-N-Stor • Safety - it seems secluded. Add mirrors for blind spots. • Amount of water flowing in ditch • Alternative #2 is safer in certain situations since you can escape up the hillside (unless you have parkour skills, which most people don’t). Also, if you are walking along the trail, if it is wider and next to a hillside, it would be nicer • It would be better for any animals living there, would look nicer and possibly cost less :) • Multi-use of bicycles • Wider, I ride my bike long distance, bike riders need a wider trail • Alleviates concerns with adjacent homes seems more scenic • Width to allow safer multi-use and to get it away from the residential area. What factors impact your decision in selecting a trail alternative (Mary Ave Alternative)? Do you have any additional comments about the Mary Ave Trail access point? Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts 6% 65% 29% #1 #2 Neither At Mary Ave., which alternative do you prefer? Would you use Mary Avenue Bridge to connect to his trail system? 16% 55% 29% #1 #2 Neither 35% 21% 44%#1 #2 Maybe Trail Segment #1 (Mary Avenue to De Anza Boulevard) Input Packet • Pedestrian Trail: concern about buffering Comments on Mary Avenue Bridge Enlargement 478 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study182Appendix Communtiy Meeting #3 Material - What we Heard Boards THE LOOPCupertino What We Heard 17056_WhatWeHeard_Comments.indd • Safety, security #1 issue. Graffiti already there. Had a burglary. • Connect to Stevens Creek Trail to the west? • Trail on north side of 280 • No monitoring of ex. Plaza. Needs monitoring. Use cameras. • Concern about beacon crossing stopping traffic on Stelling. Concern about safety. Low visibility southbound. • Do a soundwall for safety and privacy. • Light for night use. • Amenities, drinking fountains, seating, “dream big” • Security cameras at problem/key areas. • Traffic stacks at Stelling. • Concern over liability of trees dropping branches • Graffiti • Privacy & security • Stats on crime - how will police monitor • Parking will be issue • Leave redwoods • Why paved? Leave gravel • No lights • Homeless, privacy, security • Alt 2 viable? • Do we need a trail? Is demand there? For Apple employees? Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts Trail Segment #1 (Mary Avenue to De Anza Boulevard) Input Packet (cont.) Flip Chart Comments on Trail Segment 1 Plan • This is heavy traffic area, option C is better. Least preferred choice is A. • Stelling is extremely busy at rush hour in morning and evening. A surface crosswalk would be a disaster • Not option B: will cause traffic backups on Stelling. Will cause safety issues. Also the bridge railing when traveling south on Stelling blocks sight line to the trail toward the west making it much less safe. • For biking on busy streets, like Stelling, separation is very important to induce casual/weekend bicyclists • Crosswalk good for pedestrian access and in case of flooding (?) • Traffic on Stelling is heavy and depends on events at De Anza College. A crosswalk is likely to be overlooked (note crosswalk near Quinlan); A Stelling Road entrance to the bike path is likely to influence and impact traffic on Stelling • Very noisy • Very clever solution, if possible and affordable • Both please! Don’t know if Stelling will be a big turning point, the underpass path would obstruct people wanting to get on Stelling. The crosswalk support will be nominal in cost for the benefit • Apple employees have access to trail from campus and not on streets!!! • Security of undercrossing • A crosswalk across Stelling Road will make traffic on Stelling much worse than now. The traffic is bad enough now with traffic from Gardena Dr., Greenleaf, and the apartment complex feeding into Stelling. During peak hours, traffic can back into Hollenbeck in the north and all the way to Stevens Creek Blvd to the south • Both would be great, but any of the options seems workable • For long distance bike riders, it is much faster to have a grade-separated crossing, it is also safer • Very concerned about a crosswalk and the interaction with traffic - especially during school drop-off/pick-up and during rush hour • If you can’t do #1C then do #1A. Do not do just 1B! Add mirrors for blind spots. Do you have any additional comments about the Station #3 trail seg- ment (Stelling Road Crossing)? 36% 8% 56% Grade-separated Crossing Crosswalk Both 36% 8% 56% Grade-separated Crossing Crosswalk Both At Stelling Rd., what crossing type do you prefer? Comments on Stelling Road Crossing Enlargement • Concerns at Lucille Trailhead: • Safety • Parking (unwanted!) • Traffic • Increase of activity (peds/bikes/crime) • Apple employees (this project is for Apple only) 479 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 183Appendix Communtiy Meeting #3 Material - What we Heard Boards THE LOOPCupertino What We Heard 17056_WhatWeHeard_Comments.indd Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts Trail Segment #2 (De Anza Boulevard to Vallco Center) Input Packet 43% 50% 7% Bridge Tunnel Existing At De Anza Blvd., what crossing type do you prefer? Would you support removal of the existing crosswalk across De Anza Blvd, if a bridge or tunnel grade-separated crossing was provided? Regarding trail access and amenities, which of the following do you support? 43% 50% 7% Bridge Tunnel Existing 21% 31% 48% Yes No Maybe 39% 32% 29% Do you have any additional comments abou the Station #4 trail segment? Flip Chart • Concerns at Lucille Trailhead: • Safety • Parking (unwanted!) • Traffic • Increase of activity (peds/bikes/crime) • Apple employees (this project is for Apple only) Comments on Trail Segment 2 Plan • Blaney avenue: don’t block • Blaney impacted by traffic • Concern bringing kids through an already congested area. • Keep fence to prohibit access from Lucille • Drive kids to school due to speeding cars • One access point may be ok • No sidewalk • Lucille not under some parking permit. Needs to be included in permit program • Will trail encourage parking on Lucille? • Lots of Apple bikes • Can you provide access here? For Lawson & Apple • Need access to Apple to Trail • Two access points • Speeding traffic to school • Use mirrors for blind spots • Call boxes along trail. Emergency. • Bike runnels at stairs? • Can we have police cameras on the trail • Consider security of users in tunnel crossing • Access for Apple employees to trail & the streets • Would not preclude Alt 2 in the future • Look @ stair channels • Must have direct Apple access (infinite loop) to trail, to reduce bikes on Randy Ln/Larry Way. Limit access points to two: One east of Randy, (just far enough away from Apple to discourage parking) and one at Blaney. This grade-level proposal for crossing at Blaney is great. • Right next to my house. Privacy concerns. Live on Larry/Lucille. • Privacy, parking, traffic are concerns for residents of Lucille, Larry and Randy. 1: Consider wall to help with privacy. 2: Big no to any access points on Lucille Ave. • Not familiar with this section so no comment. • No trail access on Blaney/Lucille • Maintain fence - ideally make opaque for privacy. Make Lucille permitted parking M-F like Randy and Larry. Need frequent garbage clean up. Limited access - far from apple side to prevent parking problems. Maintain access under bridge for car traffic. Need police patrol for safety. • I support none of these. I live here and would be impacted. • Maintenance of trash can emptying would be very important • Multiple access points make the trail more usable for people living in the neighborhood, and would provide trail users route options • Informal trail access could serve as a pilot and could be upgraded if the trail use supports expansion • Some convenience but less cost • I prefer tunnel over bridge at De Anza mainly because of reduced elevation gain/loss; Use box culvert only when needed for trail width • Mostly just need trailhead here; benches would be the only amenities needed • How is security mentioned? Security patrol? How about people using trail for “hanging out”? • Don’t care… • As shown • Get Apple off the streets; safer alternatives for walkers/bikers; be mindful of neighborhood • Section east of Blaney - no soundwall; trail users protection form vehicles leaving the road • Provide access to Portal Ave. through CalWater site • I live next to the trail on Randy Lane; trail would cause such a problem for traffic and people, let alone criminal activity • Consider adding Trailhead/access point at the end of Lucille adjacent to the Apple campus. Work with Apple to create a linkage to Lawson Middle School along the edge of the Apple property, parallel to Larry Way, It would be nice to have some way to go directly from the trail up to the Blaney overpass. • Do not put the additional access points in the middle of Lucille. Trail amenities needed: a map of trail, a beach, mile markers, lighting. Extra security around the main entrance & under the bridge. There has been tagging & dumping (mattresses, etc) in this area. Keep the road (Lucille) open under the bridge. Do not close it. The neighborhood relies on it to get to Homestead without having to cross Blaney. Critical to AM/PM traffic flow & school traffic. Comments on Blaney Ave/ Lucille Ave Crossing Enlargement • Concerns at Lucille Trailhead: • Safety • Parking (unwanted!) • Traffic • Increase of activity (peds/bikes/crime) • Apple employees (this project is for Apple only) Multiple Trail Access Pointsand Trailhead withGreater Levels of Amenities Single Trail Access Point and Trailhead with Limited Trail Amenities Informal Trail Access and No Trailheads or Trail Amenities 480 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study184Appendix Communtiy Meeting #3 Material - What we Heard Boards THE LOOPCupertino What We Heard 17056_WhatWeHeard_Comments.indd General Station #5 Question: Do you have any additional comments about the Station #5 trail segment? • Keep Crossing at Wolfe not competing with cross traffic • This trail is for apple only. What a shame. • Be sure the contractor of Vallco includes space for bikeway • Perhaps stipulate that a proper multi-use trail along the south and east edges of hotel development be included in future development there. • The proposed path behind the new hotel is bad! It’s still under construction - is there a way to create a path (or alternative path) that passes in front of hotel tracing Perimeter Road. • Nice • Have Vallco future pay for access to trail and out of neighborhood!!! Access to trail from Vallco itself not in neighborhood at all! • It is important to keep redwoods along 280 intact behind Hyatt House and property behind the old Macys. Will there be public creek trail along Calabazas Creek from 280 and Calabazas intersection to the Calabazas and Vallco Parkway intersection? One portion of the creek trail mentioned above along the small portion of Calabazas Creek should be both pedestrian and bike. • Provide easy access to hotel for residents and guests. Use CalWater area for access to Portal Ave. • East-west connectivity for bikes between Blaney and Tantau is important, especially with Pruneridge gone • Underpass is good • Make all sections of it as wide as possible to allow lots of multi-uses & improve safety. Add mirrors for blind spots & destination signs. Trail Segment #3 (Vallco Center to Vallco Parkway) Do you have any additional comments about the Station #5 Trail Segment? Input Gathered From Community Meeting #2 Input was gathered through the input packet, comments written directly onto the plans, and comments written on large flip charts Input Packet Comments on Trail Segment 3 Plan Flip Chart Comments on Stelling Road Crossing Enlargement • Access for Guests & Visitors • No e-bikes (more than 25 mph) • No motorized • Allow e-bikes, speed < 25 mph • Concerns at Lucille Trailhead: • Safety • Parking (unwanted!) • Traffic • Increase of activity (peds/bikes/crime) • Apple employees (this project is for Apple only) 481 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 185Appendix Document Review BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email February 26, 2018 MEMO TO: Jennifer Chu FROM: Jana Schwartz, Designer Dave Rubin, Project Manager Callander Associates RE: JUNIPERO SERRA TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY / Document Review Summary Memo The Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study is evaluating the feasibility of a trail segment that supports a bicycle and pedestrian connection south of and roughly parallel to Interstate 280 between Mary Avenue and Tantau Avenue. This trail segment is a part of a larger vision plan, called the “Loop”, for a bicycle and pedestrian network within the City of Cupertino, as well as a greater regional planning effort. The study includes providing background on the project history, goals, and relationship to existing plans and other relevant documents. This memo provides a summary of relevance to other planning efforts and describes how the Junipero Serra Trail aligns with previous planning efforts and standards, as well as any additional findings that would affect trail development. Documents Reviewed Standards Reviewed Local Planning Efforts Cupertino General Plan (2015) Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan (2016) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) South Vallco Connectivity Plan (2014) Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Regional Planning Efforts Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Study (2015) Santa Clara Countywide Trails Master Plan Update (1995) Countywide Trails Prioritization and Gaps Analysis (2015) VTA Bikeways Map D (Cupertino, Campbell, Saratoga, Los Gatos) (2016) Santa Clara County I-280 Corridor Study (2017) The trail is envisioned as a 2.88 mile-long off-street, multi-use trail and serve as the City of Cupertino’s first east/west off-street transportation corridor. The City views this trail project as a high-priority and would like to see the trail allow for the shared use of bicycle and pedestrian users. A majority of the trail runs adjacent to a drainage ditch, owned by SCVWD. The proposed trail has a limited number of street crossings, located at Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard, and Wolfe Road. There are underground and overhead utilities, identified by partnering agencies PG&E and CalWater. Overhead transmission lines run roughly parallel to the proposed trail west of Blaney Avenue. Underground utilities, such as water and gas mains have been identified and planned for in the development of the preferred trail alignment. 482 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study186Appendix Document Review Memo RE: JUNIPERO SERRA TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY / Document Review Summary Memo February 26, 2018 Page 2 of 4 17056_MEM_DocumentReview.doc © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Local planning efforts that correlate with this study include the Cupertino General Plan (Land Use and Community Design, Mobility, Parks and Open Space), City of Cupertino 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, Santa Clara County I-280 Corridor Study, and the South Vallco Connectivity Plan. Each of these plans encompasses the geographical study area and includes goals and objectives that have been reviewed and complimented by the study. Each of these plans has overarching goals that hit on two main ideas: 1.Improving connectivity for bicycles and pedestrians by creating a multi-modal transportation network. 2.Enhancing accessibility and safety for bicycles and pedestrians through trail design and maintenance. Each of these plans provides a framework for the trail to align with and contribute towards the City- wide goal of elevating bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The South Vallco Connectivity Plan focuses on a specific section of the study area and provides information about the Vallco redevelopment project. The timeline of this effort coincides with this study and a final decision on the outcome of the Vallco project is unknown. Thus, the study will need to work in parallel with the final plan for the Vallco development to include a trail system as contemplated in this study. Regional planning efforts have created plans that work together to strengthen the regional bicycle and pedestrian network. Documents that were reviewed include the Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Study, Santa Clara Countywide Trails Master Plan Update, Countywide Trails Prioritization and Gaps Analysis, and VTA Bikeways Map D (Cupertino, Campbell, Saratoga, Los Gatos). To balance the identity and goals of each jurisdiction, many of the regional plans relied on a city’s general plan for city-specific information. The Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Study referenced the City of Cupertino General Plan from 2000. Information about City facilities and demographic information has been updated in the recent General Plan from 2015. The other regional plans take a similar snapshot of the Santa Clara County region and highlight bicycle and pedestrian facilities and opportunities to connect and expand the network. Countywide Trails Prioritization and Gaps Analysis summarizes the existing and potential trail reaches. This document, as well as the VTA Bikeways Map D, do not include the study area and only identify the Stevens Creek Trail and on-street connections as major bicycle and pedestrian projects for the City. More recent planning efforts, like the Caltrans District 4 Bicycle Plan (to be released spring 2018) and VTA’s Santa Clara Countywide Bike Plan (in-progress) have been asked to include the study area in textual and graphic depictions of trail opportunities. Standards that were reviewed are also across jurisdictions and not specific to the City of Cupertino. The review of standards ensures the safety of trail users and compliance with related entities. Since the trail is located in SCVWD right-of-way and includes PG&E facilities, standards related to maintenance and access were reviewed before proposing design alternatives. PG&E Standards 4.4.4 Vertical Clearance Table 4-3, “Vertical Clearance From the Ground on Nonresidential Property,” located below, provides the minimum vertical distance (in feet) from the ground on nonresidential property. 483 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 187Appendix Document Review Memo RE: JUNIPERO SERRA TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY / Document Review Summary Memo February 26, 2018 Page 3 of 4 17056_MEM_DocumentReview.doc © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. Table 4-3 Vertical Clearance From the Ground on Nonresidential Property1 Description Minimum Vertical Distance (In Feet) Over private driveways, lanes, and other areas (e.g., alleys and parking lots) accessible to vehicles. 16 Over areas accessible to pedestrians only. 12 Over buildings and bridges, or over structures (attached or unattached) that do not ordinarily support conductors and on which people can walk.8 1 Clearance requirements may be different than local electrical codes. −4.4.4A-1: Normal radial clearance: a minimum of 24 inches. −4.4.4A-2: Within 15 feet of the point of attachment on a building or structure: the normal radial clearances may be reduced to a minimum of 12 inches. 4.10 Required Vegetation Clearances −4.10.1 General Requirements: For electric distribution, high-voltage lines rated up to 60,000 volts, applicants must establish a 15-foot “low-growth” zone on both sides of all new lines. Also applicants must not plant trees that exceed 25 feet in height at maturity under or within 15 feet of distribution power poles. SCVWD Standards Most of the guidelines and details, which are specifically related to streams, grading and riparian resources, have been excerpted from the document, Uniform Interjurisdictional Trail Design, Use and Management Guidelines (UD) (April 15, 1999), which was prepared by the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department. −To control trail use and prevent environmental damage, the design should include barriers such as fences, vegetation, stiles and fallen trees. (UD – 1.3.1.3) −Use existing maintenance trails, access route and levees wherever possible to minimize impacts of new construction in riparian zones (UD – 1.3.2.3) −Trail use will generally be limited to the hours between dawn and dusk to minimize impacts to wildlife. −Lighting of trails should be avoided. Exceptions include security lighting in downtown commercial and entertainment areas where lighting should be minimized. −Surface water shall be diverted from trails by cross sloping the trail tread between 2 and 3%. (UD – 3.5.4) −Do not locate irrigation systems within 2 feet of the edge of the trail. Irrigation for turf areas around a trail should use only a pop-up variety of irrigation head. To avoid erosion and undercutting of the trail, the irrigation system should be controlled so that only incidental spray might reach the trail surface and edge. (UD – 3.5.6) −Select plants for streamside areas that do not require irrigation beyond an establishment period. −Use permeable pavements where possible. −Where overland direction of drainage away from the creek is constrained, provide positive drainage. 484 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study188Appendix Document Review Memo RE: JUNIPERO SERRA TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY / Document Review Summary Memo February 26, 2018 Page 4 of 4 17056_MEM_DocumentReview.doc © copyrighted 2018 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. The study area is almost entirely within the City of Cupertino but would have regional and local benefits as a transportation and recreational corridor. Due to the location of the study area, the local planning efforts and the standards provide the most guidance for implementing a trail at this location. The regional planning efforts should include this study area to best illustrate the collective bicycle and pedestrian network. The trail study area does not connect directly with any other regional trail system, but there are potential future connections that may be captured in future development plans. - END - 485 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 189Appendix Public Outreach Outline BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email September 15, 2017 MEMO TO: Jennifer Chu FROM: Dave Rubin Callander Associates RE: I-280 CHANNEL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY/ Public Outreach Outline Below is an outline of all outreach events, as listed in the project scope. Details for each event are described to help anticipate the necessary materials and preparation. Details with “TBD” shall be discussed and decided on between the City of Cupertino (City) and Callander Associates (CA). Community Events (2) When: 9/17 – 4/18 Where: Pop-up style at City events •Diwali Festival – September 30, 2017 •Earth Day – April 2018 Who: CA, City, Community What: Outreach materials, table banner, map of site/specific sections, meeting newsletter, pop-up tent, link to on-line resources, on-line survey link (?), balloons/eye catcher Why: Generate project interest, publicize upcoming meetings, and discuss project objectives TAC Meeting #1 When: Wednesday Nov. 29, 2017, 630pm to 8pm (scope: 11/27-12/1) Where: Working meeting; City Hall – Conference Room C Who: CA, City, TAC Members What: Review project purpose, background, and Public Meeting #1 materials Why: Gather input and apply edits to materials prior to public meeting, discuss next steps Public Meeting #1 When: Wednesday Dec. 6, 2017, 6pm to 8pm (scope: 12/4-12/8) Where: Quinlan Community Center – Cupertino Room Who: CA, City, Community, Commission and Council Members What: Existing conditions, local/regional context, goals and objectives, opportunity and constraints, initial public reactions, refreshments, on-line survey link Why: Listen to public input, discuss project objectives (short and long term), next steps TAC Meeting #2 When: Monday Feb. 12, 2017, 630pm to 8pm (scope: 2/12-2/16) Where: Working meeting; City Hall – Conference Room C Who: CA, City, TAC Members 486 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study190Appendix Public Outreach Plan BURLINGAME SAN JOSE GOLD RIVER Recreate 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 133 300 South First Street, Suite 232 12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140 Educate Burlingame, CA 94010 San Jose, CA 95113 Gold River, CA 95670 Live+Work T 650.375.1313 T 408.275.0565 T 916.985.4366 Connect F 650.344.3290 F 408.275.8047 F 916.985.4391 Sustain www.callanderassociates.com Via Email August 22, 2017 MEMO TO: Jennifer Chu FROM: Dave Rubin Callander Associates RE: I-280 CHANNEL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY/ Public Outreach Plan Below is the language to be used on promotional materials for upcoming meetings. Items include, but are not limited to, meeting newsletter, meeting postcard, social media, utility mailer, and NextDoor postings. Dates for these events shall be confirmed by 9/15. Document Text: Large Text: We want to hear from you! Come share your thoughts! Sub Text: Please join us to review trail alignment plans to help build connections in Cupertino. A series of community meetings have been planned for you to provide input on a proposed trail system near I- 280 and participate in improving the pedestrian and bicycle network near you! Upcoming events: Pop-Up Events •West Coast Farmers’ Market | Cupertino Oaks Shopping Center, October 15, 2017 9am to 1 pm •Silicon Valley Fall Festival | Memorial Park in Cupertino, September 9, 2017 from 10am to 5pm Public Meeting #1 •Cupertino Public Library (10800 Torre Ave, Cupertino, CA 95014)|December 5, 2017, 6pm to 8pm Public Meeting #2a •Homestead High School (21370 Homestead Rd, Cupertino, CA 95014)|February 20, 2017, 4pm to 8pm Public Meeting #2b City Hall (10800 Torre Ave, Cupertino, CA 95014)|March 1, 2018, 4pm to 8pm Bike and Pedestrian Commission Meeting #1 City Council Meeting #1 Public Meeting #3 •Cupertino Public Library (10800 Torre Ave, Cupertino, CA 95014)|June 6, 2017, 4pm to 8pm Bike and Pedestrian Commission Meeting #2 Park and Recreation Commission Planning Commission City Council Meeting #2 Thank you. - END - 487 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 191Appendix this page intentionally left blank 488 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study192Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo 160 W. Santa Clara Street | Suite 675 | San José, CA 95113 | (408) 278-1700 | Fax (408) 278-1717 www.fehrandpeers.com MEMORANDUM Date: October 3, 2018 To: David Rubin, Callander Associates Landscape Architects From: Steve Davis, PE, Fehr & Peers Subject: Alternatives Evaluation for Junipero Serra Trail Crossing at De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, California SJ17-1771 The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of a traffic operational analysis conducted to evaluate alternatives for an at-grade crossing of De Anza Boulevard for the proposed Junipero Serra Trail in Cupertino, California. It is our understanding that the City of Cupertino prefers a grade-separated crossing for the Junipero Serra Trail at De Anza Boulevard. However, due to construction and logistical challenges, a grade-separated alternative may not be feasible. The potential at-grade crossing would be provided at the location of the existing crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection of De Anza Boulevard with the Southbound Interstate 280 (I-280) Ramps. EXISTING CONDITIONS The intersection of De Anza Boulevard, which is oriented north-south, and the Southbound I-280 Ramps, which are oriented one-way eastbound, is signalized with crosswalks provided on the east, west, and south legs. The existing lane configuration and turning movement volumes from counts collected in December 2017 during the morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours are shown in Figure 1. 489 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 193Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 3, 2018 Page 2 of 6 Figure 1: Existing Traffic Volumes and Lane Configuration Fehr & Peers conducted field reconnaissance at this location to identify signal timing and phasing as well as overall traffic operational characteristics during the AM and PM peak periods as part of the Vallco Specific Plan EIR project. The eastbound approach of the Southbound I-280 Off-ramp operates concurrently with the parallel pedestrian crossing across De Anza Boulevard as depicted in Figure 2. This arrangement is most efficient for vehicle operations given the existing geometry, but results in a high potential for conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles since eastbound right turns from two lanes occur during the pedestrian “walk” signal phase. These concurrent movements increase the risk for collisions involving pedestrians as well as rear-end crashes resulting from vehicles unexpectedly stopping to wait for pedestrians. Figure 2: Existing Signal Phase Sequence 490 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study194Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 3, 2018 Page 3 of 6 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Due to the potential for collisions, high level of pedestrian exposure, and anticipated increase in usage of the at-grade crossing with the completion of the Junipero Serra Trail, it is desirable to modify the intersection to minimize interactions between modes. As such, two project alternatives have been developed for consideration: Alternative 1 – No physical improvements would be constructed, but signal phasing would be modified such that the eastbound right-turn movement and pedestrian crossings would not be in conflict. As the eastbound approach has a shared left/through/right-turn lane, all movements on this approach would continue to operate together as a standalone phase and pedestrian crossings of De Anza Boulevard would operate concurrently wit h the southbound left turn as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Proposed Alternative 1 Signal Phase Sequence Alternative 2 – An additional lane would be constructed on the Southbound I-280 Off-ramp, as shown in Attachment A, to provide a left-turn lane, shared left-turn/through lane, and two dedicated right-turn lanes. This change would allow separate signal phases for the right-turn movement and the shared left-turn/through movement, making it possible for the crosswalk phase to operate concurrently with the eastbound left-turn/through movement as shown in Figure 4. Eastbound right turns and southbound left turns would operate concurrently in this alternative. Figure 4: Proposed Alternative 2 Signal Phase Sequence 491 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 195Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 3, 2018 Page 4 of 6 OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic operations were evaluated for the existing (no- build) conditions and two project alternatives using the HCM 2000 methodology included in Synchro 10 software. Level of Service The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service. Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on factors such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, the best operating conditions, to LOS F, the worst operating conditions. LOS E represents “at-capacity” operations. When traffic volumes exceed the intersection capacity, stop-and-go conditions result, and operations are designated as LOS F. The method described in Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board) was used to prepare the level of service calculations for the subject intersection. This level of service method, which is approved by the City of Cupertino and VTA, analyzes a signalized intersection’s operation based on average control delay per vehicle. Control delay includes the initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections is correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 1. 492 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study196Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 3, 2018 Page 5 of 6 TABLE 1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS USING AVERAGE CONTROL VEHICULAR DELAY Level of Service Description Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. ≤ 10.0 B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. 10.1 to 20.0 C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. 20.1 to 35.0 D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 35.1 to 55.0 E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. 55.1 to 80.0 F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. > 80.0 Source: Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines, October 2014; VTA Congestion Management Program, June 2003; Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Analysis Results The Existing operating conditions as well as anticipated operated conditions for Alternatives 1 and 2 are presented in Table 2. HCM 2000 capacity analysis outputs can be found in Attachment B. As can be seen, the intersection generally operates acceptably in the Existing condition with LOS D or better during both peak periods. Operations would degrade with the implementation of Alternative 1 due to less efficient signal timing constraining overall intersection capacity. Overall delay would remain relatively consistent compared to Existing Conditions with the implementation of Alternative 2 as the reduction in efficiency caused by modified traffic signal phasing is largely offset by the increase in physical capacity associated with ramp widening. Additionally, the separation of left-turn/through and right-turn traffic signal phases in Alternative 2 would allow more efficient signal phasing than proposed in Alternative 1. 493 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 197Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 3, 2018 Page 6 of 6 TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Alternative AM PM Delay LOS Delay LOS Existing 38.7 D 34.3 C Alternative 1 78.5 E 48.9 D Alternative 2 38.2 D 35.4 D Source: Fehr & Peers (2018) FINDINGS Based on the analysis the following can be concluded: • This existing intersection configuration at De Anza Boulevard and the Southbound I-280 Ramps, while most efficient for vehicle operations, results in a high potential for conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles since eastbound right turns from two lanes occur during the parallel pedestrian “walk” signal phase. • Alternative 1 would not include any physical improvements, but signal phasing would be modified such that the eastbound right turn and pedestrian crossings would not be in conflict. It is anticipated this would result in a degradation of traffic operations at the intersection. • Alternative 2 would include the construction of an additional lane on the Southbound I- 280 Off-ramp, resulting in a left-turn lane, shared left-turn/through lane, and two dedicated right-turn lanes. This change would allow separate signal phases for the right-turn movement and the shared left-turn/through movement, making it possible for the crosswalk phase to operate concurrently with the eastbound left-turn/through movement. Overall intersection delay would remain relatively consistent with Existing Conditions in this scenario. • As a result of the above, Fehr & Peers recommends Alternative 2 should an at-grade crossing be pursued for the Junipero Serra Trail at De Anza Boulevard. Attachment A – Proposed Alternative 2 Concept Attachment B – HCM 2000 Capacity Analysis Outputs 494 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study198Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 2, 2018 Attachment A Proposed Alternative 2 Concept 495 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 199 De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo 496 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study200 this page intentionally left blank 497 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 201Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo David Rubin October 2, 2018 Attachment B HCM 2000 Capacity Analysis Outputs 498 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study202Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Configuration 1: De Anza Blvd & I-280 EB Off-Ramp/I-280 EB On-Ramp Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 636 2 782 0 0 0 0 1571 407 594 1492 0 Future Volume (vph) 636 2 782 0 0 0 0 1571 407 594 1492 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 0.95 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1665 1452 1448 7471 1443 3400 5036 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1665 1452 1448 7471 1443 3400 5036 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)662 2 815 0 0 0 0 1636 424 619 1554 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 26 0 0 0 0 0 282 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 517 477 447 0 0 0 0 1636 142 619 1554 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)18 18 23 23 14 Heavy Vehicles (%)3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Turn Type Split NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 8 8 6 52 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.4 48.4 48.4 43.6 43.6 26.0 73.6 Effective Green, g (s) 48.4 48.4 48.4 43.6 43.6 26.0 73.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.34 0.34 0.20 0.57 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 619 540 539 2505 483 680 2851 v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 c0.33 c0.22 c0.18 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.65 0.29 0.91 0.55 Uniform Delay, d1 37.2 38.2 37.0 36.8 31.9 50.9 17.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.5 15.7 10.2 1.3 1.5 18.4 0.8 Delay (s)46.7 53.8 47.2 38.1 33.4 69.3 18.4 Level of Service D D D DCEB Approach Delay (s)49.2 0.0 37.1 32.9 Approach LOS D A D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Intersection Capacity Analysis De Anza Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour 499 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 203Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo Existing PM Exisiting Configuration 1: De Anza Blvd & I-280 EB Off-Ramp Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 369 26 507 0 0 0 0 1930 519 428 2102 0 Future Volume (vph) 369 26 507 0 0 0 0 1930 519 428 2102 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 0.95 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.94 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.89 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1430 1413 7544 1514 3433 5085 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1430 1413 7544 1514 3433 5085 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)380 27 523 0 0 0 0 1990 535 441 2167 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 323 303 270 0 0 0 0 1990 535 441 2167 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)51 51 12 10 10 12 Turn Type Split NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 8 8 6 52 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 54.0 54.0 36.0 94.0 Effective Green, g (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 54.0 54.0 36.0 94.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.26 0.67 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 456 388 383 2909 583 882 3414 v/s Ratio Prot 0.19 c0.21 0.26 0.13 c0.43 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 c0.35 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.78 0.70 0.68 0.92 0.50 0.63 Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 47.2 45.9 35.9 40.9 44.3 13.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 9.8 5.8 1.3 21.7 2.0 0.9 Delay (s)51.0 57.0 51.7 37.2 62.6 46.4 14.1 Level of Service D E D DEDB Approach Delay (s)53.2 0.0 42.6 19.5 Approach LOS D A D B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Intersection Capacity Analysis De Anza Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour 500 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study204Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo Existing AM Option 1 Configuration 1: De Anza Blvd & I-280 EB Off-Ramp/I-280 EB On-Ramp Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 636 2 782 0 0 0 0 1571 407 594 1492 0 Future Volume (vph) 636 2 782 0 0 0 0 1571 407 594 1492 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 0.95 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1665 1443 1435 7471 1443 3400 5036 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1665 1443 1435 7471 1443 3400 5036 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)662 2 815 0 0 0 0 1636 424 619 1554 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 64 371 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 517 426 102 0 0 0 0 1636 424 619 1554 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)18 18 23 23 14 Heavy Vehicles (%)3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Turn Type Split NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 3 3 6 5 8 2 Permitted Phases 3 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 41.7 41.7 48.3 50.7 Effective Green, g (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 41.7 41.7 48.3 50.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.32 0.32 0.37 0.39 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 358 310 309 2396 462 1263 1964 v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 0.29 0.22 c0.18 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.29 v/c Ratio 1.44 1.37 0.33 0.68 0.92 0.49 0.79 Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 51.0 43.1 38.4 42.5 31.4 35.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 215.1 187.1 0.6 1.6 25.7 0.3 3.4 Delay (s)266.1 238.1 43.7 40.0 68.2 31.7 38.3 Level of Service F F D DECD Approach Delay (s)185.7 0.0 45.8 36.4 Approach LOS F A D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 78.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Intersection Capacity Analysis De Anza Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps Alternative 1 AM Peak Hour 501 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 205Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo Existing PM Option 1 with Extended Cycle Length 1: De Anza Blvd & I-280 EB Off-Ramp/I-280 EB On-Ramp Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 369 26 507 0 0 0 0 1930 519 428 2102 0 Future Volume (vph) 369 26 507 0 0 0 0 1930 519 428 2102 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 0.95 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 0.90 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.89 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1388 1355 7544 1514 3433 5085 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1388 1355 7544 1514 3433 5085 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)380 27 523 0 0 0 0 1990 535 441 2167 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 69 247 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 323 240 51 0 0 0 0 1990 535 441 2167 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)51 51 12 10 10 12 Turn Type Split NA Perm NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 3 3 6 5 8 2 Permitted Phases 3 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 57.6 57.6 46.4 66.6 Effective Green, g (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 57.6 57.6 46.4 66.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.41 0.41 0.33 0.48 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 288 237 232 3103 622 1137 2419 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.17 0.26 c0.13 c0.43 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.35 v/c Ratio 1.12 1.01 0.22 0.64 0.86 0.39 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 58.0 58.0 49.9 32.9 37.5 35.9 33.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 89.8 62.0 0.5 1.0 14.5 0.2 5.7 Delay (s)147.8 120.0 50.4 34.0 52.0 36.1 39.2 Level of Service F F D CDDD Approach Delay (s)107.4 0.0 37.8 38.7 Approach LOS F A D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Intersection Capacity Analysis De Anza Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps Alternative 1 PM Peak Hour 502 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study206Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo Option 2 Existing AM 1: De Anza Blvd & I-280 EB Off-Ramp/I-280 EB On-Ramp Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 636 2 782 0 0 0 0 1571 407 594 1492 0 Future Volume (vph) 636 2 782 0 0 0 0 1571 407 594 1492 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1665 1669 2760 7471 1443 3400 5036 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1665 1669 2760 7471 1443 3400 5036 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)662 2 815 0 0 0 0 1636 424 619 1554 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 652 0 0 0 0 0 241 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 331 334 163 0 0 0 0 1636 183 619 1554 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)18 18 23 23 14 Heavy Vehicles (%)3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Turn Type Split NA custom NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 8 8 1!6!5! 2! Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 36.0 26.0 56.0 56.0 26.0 56.0 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 36.0 26.0 56.0 56.0 26.0 56.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.20 0.43 0.43 0.20 0.43 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 461 462 552 3218 621 680 2169 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.20 0.06 0.22 c0.18 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.30 0.51 0.29 0.91 0.72 Uniform Delay, d1 42.4 42.5 44.2 27.0 24.1 50.9 30.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.3 5.5 1.4 0.6 1.2 18.4 2.1 Delay (s)47.7 48.0 45.6 27.5 25.3 69.3 32.5 Level of Service D D D CCEC Approach Delay (s)46.6 0.0 27.1 43.0 Approach LOS D A C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.0 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Intersection Capacity Analysis De Anza Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps Alternative 2 AM Peak Hour 503 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 207Appendix De Anza Boulevard At-Grade Crossing Traffic Impacts Memo Existing PM Option 2 1: De Anza Blvd & I-280 EB Off-Ramp/I-280 EB On-Ramp Synchro 10 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 369 26 507 0 0 0 0 1930 519 428 2102 0 Future Volume (vph) 369 26 507 0 0 0 0 1930 519 428 2102 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1696 2787 7544 1514 3433 5085 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1696 2787 7544 1514 3433 5085 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)380 27 523 0 0 0 0 1990 535 441 2167 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 426 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 206 97 0 0 0 0 1990 535 441 2167 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr)51 51 12 10 10 12 Turn Type Split NA custom NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 8 8 1!6!5! 2! Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.6 32.6 26.0 69.4 69.4 26.0 69.4 Effective Green, g (s) 32.6 32.6 26.0 69.4 69.4 26.0 69.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.19 0.50 0.50 0.19 0.50 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 391 394 517 3739 750 637 2520 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.12 0.03 0.26 c0.13 c0.43 v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.52 0.19 0.53 0.71 0.69 0.86 Uniform Delay, d1 46.8 46.9 48.1 24.2 27.5 53.3 31.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 1.3 0.8 0.5 5.7 6.1 4.1 Delay (s)47.9 48.2 48.9 24.7 33.3 59.4 35.1 Level of Service D D D CCED Approach Delay (s)48.5 0.0 26.5 39.2 Approach LOS D A C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Intersection Capacity Analysis De Anza Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps Alternative 2 PM Peak Hour 504 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study208Appendix this page intentionally left blank 505 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 209 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al A Pr o j ec t St ar t -Up 1.Bonding and mobilization 8% LS Allow $118,452 Allow $121,184 Allow $76,128 2.Construction staking $10,000.00 LS Allow $10,000 Allow $10,000 Allow $10,000 3.Temporary construction fencing $5.00 LF 200 $1,000 460 $2,300 1,440 $7,200 4.Traffic control $20,000.00 LS Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 5.Tree protection and pruning Allow LS Allow $5,000 Allow $5,000 Allow $2,500 $154,450 $158,480 $115,830 $428,760 B Dem o l i t io n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 70,000 $52,500 70,400 $52,800 68,800 $51,600 2.Chain link fence $10.00 LF 35 $350 1,050 $10,500 20 $200 3.Wood fence at Mary Ave $10.00 LF 490 $4,900 0 $0 0 $0 4.Chain link gate $500.00 EA 3 $1,500 4 $2,000 2 $1,000 5.Tree removal $750.00 EA 7 $5,250 0 $0 0 $0 $64,500 $65,300 $52,800 $182,600 C Gr ad i n g & Dr ai n ag e 1.Rough grading, 8" depth $30.00 CY 1,730 $51,900 1,750 $52,500 1,670 $50,100 2.Adjust manholes and vaults to grade $25,000.00 LS Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 3.Soil off haul, 8" depth min.$50.00 CY 1,730 $86,500 1,750 $87,500 1,670 $83,500 $163,400 $165,000 $158,600 $487,000 D Er o s i o n Co n t r o l 1.Temporary construction entrance $3,000.00 LS Allow $3,000 Allow $3,000 Allow $3,000 2.Fiber rolls $4.00 LF 5,100 $20,400 4,000 $16,000 3,500 $14,000 3.SWPPP maintenance Allow LS Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 $48,400 $44,000 $42,000 $134,400 E Tr ai l & Sit e Fu r n i s h i n g s 1.Asphalt path including base rock, 10' average width $5.00 SF 52,230 $261,150 52,860 $264,300 51,600 $258,000 2.Asphalt shoulder, 2' wide both sides $5.00 LF 6,200 $31,000 4,400 $22,000 7,000 $35,000 3.Striping, on-trail $2.00 LF 5,600 $11,200 4,400 $8,800 4,300 $8,600 4.Decorative concrete pavement at trailhead $30.00 SF 480 $14,400 2,700 $81,000 2,300 $69,000 5.Retaining curb $50.00 LF 5,100 $255,000 4,400 $220,000 4,000 $200,000 6.Retaining wall (height varies, see plan)$200.00 LF 375 $75,000 0 $0 0 $0 7.Concrete seatwall at trailhead $300.00 LF 30 $9,000 120 $36,000 70 $21,000 8.Signal timing upgrades at De Anza (base project)Allow LS 0 $0 1 $30,000 0 $0 9.Flashing beacon and crosswalk at Stelling (base project) $50,000.00 EA 1 $50,000 0 $0 0 $0 10.Intersection modifications at Vallco Parkway trailhead Allow LS 0 $0 0 $0 1 $50,000 11.Curb and gutter $45.00 LF 0 $0 400 $18,000 160 $7,200 12.Curb ramp $3,500.00 EA 2 $7,000 2 $7,000 1 $3,500 Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #1 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val lc o Pk w y 17056_CE_Alt#1.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.1 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #1 506 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study210 this page intentionally left blank 507 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 211 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #1 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val lc o Pk w y 13.Interpretive sign $6,000.00 EA 1 $6,000 1 $6,000 1 $6,000 14.Dog waste bag dispenser $1,200.00 EA 2 $2,400 2 $2,400 2 $2,400 15.Trash receptacle $1,500.00 EA 3 $4,500 3 $4,500 3 $4,500 16.Trail directional signage $500.00 EA 2 $1,000 2 $1,000 2 $1,000 17.Security and privacy wood fence, 8'$100,000.00 LS Allow $100,000 Allow $100,000 Allow $0 18.Barrier railing, 4'$60.00 LF 5,600 $336,000 5,400 $324,000 0 $0 19.Chainlink fence, 6'$60.00 LF 70 $4,200 0 $0 0 $0 20.Vehicular crash barrier $100.00 LF 0 $0 75 $7,500 0 $0 21.Trail map sign $2,000.00 EA 2 $4,000 2 $4,000 2 $4,000 22.Collapsible bollard $1,000.00 EA 3 $3,000 4 $4,000 3 $3,000 $1,174,850 $1,140,500 $673,200 $2,988,550 F Pl an t i n g & Ir r i g at io n 1.Soil preparation, irrigation, planting, maintenance Allow LS Allow $25,000 Allow $100,000 Allow $25,000 2.Tree, 24" box $500.00 EA 9 $4,500 0 $0 0 $0 $29,500 $100,000 $25,000 $154,500 G Co n s t r u c t i o n Su b -To t al , B as e Pr o j ec t $1,635,100 $1,673,280 $1,067,430 $4,375,810 H Des i g n Co n t i n g en c y 15%LS Allow $245,265 Allow $250,992 Allow $160,115 $245,270 $250,990 $160,110 $656,370 I ANTICIPATED L OW B ID, B as e Pr o j ec t $1,880,370 $1,924,270 $1,227,540 $5,032,180 J Co n s t r u c t i o n Co n t i n g en c y 10%LS Allow $188,037 Allow $192,427 Allow $122,754 $188,040 $192,430 $122,750 $503,220 K Es c al at io n (3% p er yr f o r 3 y ear s )9%LS Allow $169,233 Allow $173,184 Allow $110,479 $169,230 $173,180 $110,480 $452,890 L TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS, B ASE PROJ ECT $2,237,640 $2,289,880 $1,460,770 $5,988,290 M Pr o f es s i o n al Ser v ic es , B as e Pr o j ec t 1.Topographic survey Allow LS Allow $15,000 Allow $15,000 Allow $15,000 2.Geotechnical services Allow LS Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 3.Design development 3% LS Allow $67,129 Allow $68,696 Allow $43,823 17056_CE_Alt#1.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.2 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #1 508 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study212 this page intentionally left blank 509 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 213 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un it Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #1 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val l c o Pk w y 4.Construction documents and permitting 8% LS Allow $179,011 Allow $183,190 Allow $116,862 5.Bidding and construction administration 3% LS Allow $67,129 Allow $68,696 Allow $43,823 6.Testing and special inspection 1% LS Allow $22,376 Allow $22,899 Allow $14,608 7.Environmental documentation (MND), assumes no NEPA Allow LS Allow $35,000 Allow $35,000 Allow $35,000 $405,650 $413,480 $289,120 $1,108,250 N TOTAL B ASE PROJ ECT COSTS $2,643,290 $2,703,360 $1,749,890 $7,096,540 O St el l i n g Un d er c r o s s i n g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 13,380 $10,035 0 $0 0 $0 2.Chain link fence removal $50.00 LF 30 $1,500 0 $0 0 $0 3.Tree removal $750.00 EA 10 $7,500 0 $0 0 $0 4.Rough grading, 8" depth $50.00 CY 250 $12,500 0 $0 0 $0 5.Soil off-haul, 8" depth $100.00 CY 250 $25,000 0 $0 0 $0 6.Barrier fence $100.00 LF 460 $46,000 0 $0 0 $0 7.Concrete pavement $25.00 SF 4,600 $115,000 0 $0 0 $0 8.Retaining wall $400.00 LF 840 $336,000 0 $0 0 $0 9.Striping, on-trail $5.00 LF 840 $4,200 0 $0 0 $0 10.Security lighting $40,000.00 LS Allow $40,000 0 $0 0 $0 11.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $89,660 Allow $0 Allow $0 12.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $59,774 Allow $0 Allow $0 13.Inflation 9% LS Allow $53,796 Allow $0 Allow $0 14.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $89,660 Allow $0 Allow $0 $890,630 $0 $0 $890,630 P De An za Ped es t r i an B r i d g e Cr o s s i n g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 0 $0 19,700 $14,775 0 $0 2.Tree removal $750.00 EA 0 $0 12 $9,000 0 $0 3.Steel utility pole relocation (PG&E)$1,000,000.00 EA 0 $0 1 $1,000,000 0 $0 4.Pedestrian bridge, approaches, stairs, support columns and railing $8,000,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $8,000,000 0 $0 5.Box culvert, 5'x8'$1,250.00 LF 0 $0 730 $912,500 0 $0 17056_CE_Alt#1.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.3 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #1 510 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study214 this page intentionally left blank 511 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 215 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #1 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val lc o Pk w y 6.Asphalt path spur trail including base rock, 10' wide $5.25 SF 0 $0 7,300 $38,325 0 $0 7.Security lighting $60,000.00 LS Allow $0 0 $60,000 0 $0 8.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,505,190 Allow $0 9.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,003,460 Allow $0 10.Inflation 9% LS Allow $0 Allow $903,114 Allow $0 11.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,505,190 Allow $0 $0 $14,951,550 $0 $14,951,550 Q DeAn za Tu n n el Cr o s s i n g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 0 $0 16,900 $12,675 0 $0 2.Chain link fence removal $10.00 LF 0 $0 170 $1,700 0 $0 3.Underground utility relocation $500,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $500,000 0 $0 4.Tunnel drainage $150,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $150,000 Allow $0 5.Tree removal $750.00 EA 0 $0 2 $1,500 0 $0 6.Steel utility pole relocation (PG&E)$1,000,000.00 EA 0 $0 1 $1,000,000 0 $0 7.Tunnel, stairs, approaches, railings $12,000,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $12,000,000 0 $0 8.Box culvert, 5'x8'$1,250.00 LF 0 $0 450 $562,500 0 $0 9.Asphalt path spur trail including base rock, 10' wide $5.25 SF 0 $0 4,500 $23,625 0 $0 10.Skylight $10,000.00 EA 0 $0 1 $10,000 0 $0 11.Chain link fence $60.00 LF 0 $0 200 $12,000 0 $0 12.Property acquisition costs $8,000,000.00 Acre 0 $0 0.05 $400,000 0 $0 13.Security lighting $200,000.00 LS Allow $0 0 $200,000 0 $0 14.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $2,231,100 Allow $0 15.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,487,400 Allow $0 16.Inflation 9% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,338,660 Allow $0 17.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $2,231,100 Allow $0 $0 $22,162,260 $0 $22,162,260 R DeAn za At -g r ad e Cr o s s i n g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 0 $0 6,550 $4,913 0 $0 2.Curb removal $15.00 LF 0 $0 220 $3,300 0 $0 3.Concrete removal $3.00 SF 0 $0 1,500 $4,500 0 $0 4.Asphalt removal $3.00 SF 0 $0 480 $1,440 0 $0 5.Sawcut $5.00 LF 0 $0 280 $1,400 0 $0 17056_CE_Alt#1.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.4 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #1 512 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study216 this page intentionally left blank 513 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 217 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #1 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val lc o Pk w y 6.Tree removal $750.00 EA 0 $0 2 $1,500 0 $0 7.Traffic signal modification $500,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $500,000 0 $0 8.Traffic sign relocation $7,500.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $7,500 0 $0 9.Asphalt pavement $5.00 SF 0 $0 5,200 $26,000 0 $0 10.Concrete pavement $25.00 SF 0 $0 3,400 $85,000 0 $0 11.Concrete ramp $2,500.00 EA 0 $0 4 $10,000 0 $0 12.Concrete curb and gutter $70.00 LF 0 $0 200 $14,000 0 $0 13.Retaining wall, max. 4'$500.00 LF 0 $0 360 $180,000 0 $0 14.Traffic striping $5,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $5,000 0 $0 15.Relocate irrigation $25,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $25,000 0 $0 16.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $130,433 Allow $0 17.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $0 Allow $86,955 Allow $0 18.Inflation 9% LS Allow $0 Allow $78,260 Allow $0 19.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $130,433 Allow $0 $0 $1,295,630 $0 $1,295,630 The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level of document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates has no control over construction quantities, costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices. B as ed o n d r aw i n g s en t it l ed "Al t er n at i v e Al i g n m en t Pl an ", d at ed "2/20/2018" 17056_CE_Alt#1.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.5 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #1 514 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study218 this page intentionally left blank 515 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 219 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al A Pr o j ec t St ar t -Up 1.Bonding and mobilization 8% LS Allow $471,460 Allow $817,824 Allow $77,536 2.Construction staking $10,000.00 LS Allow $10,000 Allow $10,000 Allow $10,000 3.Temporary construction fencing $5.00 LF 200 $1,000 460 $2,300 1,440 $7,200 4.Traffic control $20,000.00 LS Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 5.Tree protection and pruning Allow LS Allow $5,000 Allow $5,000 Allow $2,500 $507,460 $855,120 $117,240 $1,479,820 B Dem o l i t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 67,800 $50,850 70,400 $52,800 68,800 $51,600 2.Concrete lined ditch $30.00 LF 5,260 $157,800 5,030 $150,900 0 $0 3.Chain link fence $10.00 LF 35 $350 1,050 $10,500 20 $200 4.Wood fence at Mary Ave $10.00 LF 490 $4,900 0 $0 0 $0 5.Chain link gate $500.00 EA 3 $1,500 4 $2,000 2 $1,000 6.Tree removal $750.00 EA 7 $5,250 0 $0 0 $0 $220,650 $216,200 $52,800 $489,650 C Gr ad i n g & Dr ai n ag e 1.Rough grading, 8" depth $30.00 CY 1,680 $50,400 1,750 $52,500 1,670 $50,100 2.Adjust manholes and vaults to grade $25,000.00 LS Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 3.Earthwork at box culvert Allow LS Allow $50,000 Allow $50,000 Allow $0 4.Drainage re-connections to box culvert Allow LS Allow $50,000 Allow $50,000 Allow $0 5.Soil off haul, 8" depth min.$50.00 CY 1,680 $84,000 1,750 $87,500 1,670 $83,500 $259,400 $265,000 $158,600 $683,000 D Er o s i o n Co n t r o l 1.Temporary construction entrance $3,000.00 LS Allow $3,000 Allow $3,000 Allow $3,000 2.Fiber rolls $4.00 LF 5,100 $20,400 4,000 $16,000 3,500 $14,000 3.SWPPP maintenance Allow LS Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 Allow $25,000 $48,400 $44,000 $42,000 $134,400 E Tr ai l & Si t e Fu r n i s h i n g s 1.Asphalt lift over box culvert, 4" deep $2.50 SF 62,940 $157,350 52,800 $132,000 8,400 $21,000 2.Asphalt pavement over agg base $5.00 SF 4,230 $21,150 8,800 $44,000 43,800 $219,000 3.DG shoulder, 2' wide both sides $4.00 LF 22,400 $89,600 17,600 $70,400 17,200 $68,800 4.4'x4' box culvert $500.00 LF 2,710 $1,355,000 0 $0 0 $0 5.5'x8' box culvert $1,250.00 LF 2,550 $3,187,500 0 $0 0 $0 6.6'x10' box culvert $1,750.00 LF 0 $0 5,030 $8,802,500 0 $0 7.Striping, on-trail $2.00 LF 5,600 $11,200 4,400 $8,800 4,300 $8,600 8.Decorative concrete pavement at trailhead $30.00 SF 480 $14,400 2,700 $81,000 2,300 $69,000 9.Retaining curb $50.00 LF 5,100 $255,000 4,400 $220,000 4,000 $200,000 10.Retaining wall (height varies)$200.00 LF 220 $44,000 0 $0 0 $0 11.Concrete seatwall at trailhead $300.00 LF 30 $9,000 120 $36,000 70 $21,000 12.Signal timing upgrades at De Anza (base project)Allow LS 0 $0 1 $30,000 0 $0 Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #2 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B lv d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val l c o Pk w y 17056_CE_Alt#2.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.1 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #2 516 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study220 this page intentionally left blank 517 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 221 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #2 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val l c o Pk w y 13.Flashing beacon and crosswalk at Stelling (base project) $50,000.00 EA 1 $50,000 0 $0 0 $0 14.Intersection modifications at Vallco Parkway trailhead Allow LS 0 $0 0 $0 1 $50,000 15.Curb and gutter $45.00 LF 0 $0 400 $18,000 0 $0 16.Curb ramp $3,500.00 EA 2 $7,000 2 $7,000 1 $3,500 17.Interpretive sign $6,000.00 EA 1 $6,000 1 $6,000 1 $6,000 18.Dog waste bag dispenser $1,200.00 EA 2 $2,400 2 $2,400 2 $2,400 19.Trash receptacle $1,500.00 EA 3 $4,500 3 $4,500 3 $4,500 20.Trail directional signage $3,500.00 EA 2 $7,000 2 $7,000 2 $7,000 21.Security and privacy wood fence, 8' tall $100,000.00 LS Allow $100,000 Allow $100,000 Allow $0 22.Chainlink fence, 6'$60.00 LF 70 $4,200 0 $0 0 $0 23.Vehicular crash barrier $200.00 LF 0 $0 75 $15,000 0 $0 24.Trail map sign $3,500.00 EA 2 $7,000 2 $7,000 2 $7,000 25.Collapsible bollard $1,000.00 EA 3 $3,000 6 $6,000 3 $3,000 $5,335,300 $9,597,600 $690,800 $15,623,700 F Pl an t i n g & Ir r i g at i o n 1.Soil preparation, irrigation, planting, maintenance Allow LS 25,000 $25,000 Allow $100,000 Allow $25,000 2.Tree, 24" box $500.00 EA 9 $4,500 0 $0 0 $0 $29,500 $100,000 $25,000 $154,500 G Co n s t r u c t i o n Su b -To t al , B as e Pr o j ec t $6,400,710 $11,077,920 $1,086,440 $18,565,070 H Des i g n Co n t i n g en c y 15%LS Allow $960,107 Allow $1,661,688 Allow $162,966 $960,110 $1,661,690 $162,970 $2,784,770 I ANTICIPATED L OW B ID, B as e Pr o j ec t $7,360,820 $12,739,610 $1,249,410 $21,349,840 J Co n s t r u c t i o n Co n t i n g en c y 10%LS Allow $736,082 Allow $1,273,961 Allow $124,941 $736,080 $1,273,960 $124,940 $2,134,980 K Es c al at i o n (3% p er y r f o r 3 y ear s )9%LS Allow $662,474 Allow $1,146,565 Allow $112,447 $662,470 $1,146,560 $112,450 $1,921,480 L TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS, B ASE PROJ ECT $8,759,370 $15,160,130 $1,486,800 $25,406,300 M Pr o f es s i o n al Ser v i c es , B as e Pr o j ec t 17056_CE_Alt#2.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.2 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #2 518 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study222 this page intentionally left blank 519 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 223 Cost Estimate for Alternate #2 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #2 Mar y Av e t o De An za B lv d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val l c o Pk w y 1.Topographic survey Allow LS Allow $15,000 Allow $15,000 Allow $15,000 2.Geotechnical services Allow LS Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 Allow $20,000 3.Design development 3% LS Allow $262,781 Allow $454,804 Allow $44,604 4.Construction documents and permitting 8% LS Allow $700,750 Allow $1,212,810 Allow $118,944 5.Bidding and construction administration 3% LS Allow $262,781 Allow $454,804 Allow $44,604 6.Testing and special inspection 1% LS Allow $87,594 Allow $151,601 Allow $14,868 7.Environmental documentation (MND), assumes no NEPA Allow LS Allow $35,000 Allow $35,000 Allow $35,000 $1,383,910 $2,344,020 $293,020 $4,020,950 N TOTAL B ASE PROJ ECT COSTS $10,143,280 $17,504,150 $1,779,820 $29,427,250 O St el l i n g Un d er c r o s s in g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 13,380 $10,035 0 $0 0 $0 2.Chain link fence removal $50.00 LF 30 $1,500 0 $0 0 $0 3.Tree removal $750.00 EA 10 $7,500 0 $0 0 $0 4.Rough grading, 8" depth $50.00 CY 250 $12,500 0 $0 0 $0 5.Soil off-haul, 8" depth $100.00 CY 250 $25,000 0 $0 0 $0 6.Barrier fence $100.00 LF 460 $46,000 0 $0 0 $0 7.Concrete pavement $25.00 SF 4,600 $115,000 0 $0 0 $0 8.Retaining wall $400.00 LF 840 $336,000 0 $0 0 $0 9.Striping, on-trail $5.00 LF 840 $4,200 0 $0 0 $0 10.Security lighting $40,000.00 LS Allow $40,000 0 $0 0 $0 11.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $89,660 Allow $0 Allow $0 12.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $59,774 Allow $0 Allow $0 13.Inflation 9% LS Allow $53,796 Allow $0 Allow $0 14.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $89,660 Allow $0 Allow $0 $890,630 $0 $0 $890,630 P De An za Ped es t r i an B r i d g e Cr o s s i n g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 0 $0 19,700 $14,775 0 $0 2.Tree removal $750.00 EA 0 $0 12 $9,000 0 $0 3.Steel utility pole relocation (PG&E)$1,000,000.00 EA 0 $0 1 $1,000,000 0 $0 4.Pedestrian bridge, approaches, stairs, support columns and railing $8,000,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $8,000,000 0 $0 17056_CE_Alt#2.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.3 of 5 520 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study224 this page intentionally left blank 521 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 225 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #2 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val l c o Pk w y 5.Box culvert, 5'x8'$1,250.00 LF 0 $0 730 $912,500 0 $0 6.Asphalt path spur trail including base rock, 10' wide $5.25 SF 0 $0 7,300 $38,325 0 $0 7.Security lighting $60,000.00 LS Allow $0 0 $60,000 0 $0 8.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,505,190 Allow $0 9.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,003,460 Allow $0 10.Inflation 9% LS Allow $0 Allow $903,114 Allow $0 11.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,505,190 Allow $0 $0 $14,951,550 $0 $14,951,550 Q DeAn za Tu n n el Cr o s s i n g Op t io n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 0 $0 16,900 $12,675 0 $0 2.Chain link fence removal $10.00 LF 0 $0 170 $1,700 0 $0 3.Underground utility relocation $500,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $500,000 0 $0 4.Tunnel drainage $150,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $150,000 Allow $0 5.Tree removal $750.00 EA 0 $0 2 $1,500 0 $0 6.Steel utility pole relocation (PG&E)$1,000,000.00 EA 0 $0 1 $1,000,000 0 $0 7.Tunnel, stairs, approaches, railings $12,000,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $12,000,000 0 $0 8.Box culvert, 5'x8'$1,250.00 LF 0 450 $562,500 0 $0 9.Asphalt path spur trail including base rock, 10' wide $5.25 SF 0 $0 4,500 $23,625 0 $0 10.Skylight $10,000.00 EA 0 $0 1 $10,000 0 $0 11.Chain link fence $60.00 LF 0 $0 200 $12,000 0 $0 12.Property acquisition costs $8,000,000.00 Acre 0 $0 0.05 $400,000 0 $0 12.Security lighting $200,000.00 LS Allow $0 0 $200,000 0 $0 13.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $2,231,100 Allow $0 14.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,487,400 Allow $0 15.Inflation 9% LS Allow $0 Allow $1,338,660 Allow $0 16.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $2,231,100 Allow $0 $0 $22,162,260 $0 $22,162,260 R DeAn za At -g r ad e Cr o s s i n g Op t i o n 1.Clear and grub $0.75 SF 0 $0 6,550 $4,913 0 $0 2.Curb removal $15.00 LF 0 $0 220 $3,300 0 $0 3.Concrete removal $3.00 SF 0 $0 1,500 $4,500 0 $0 17056_CE_Alt#2.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.4 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #2 522 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study226 this page intentionally left blank 523 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 227 Estimate of Probable Construction Costs prepared for the City of Cupertino prepared on: 5/17/18 prepared by: LC checked by: DR Seg m en t s It em #Des c r i p t i o n Co s t Un i t Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Qt y It em To t al Su b t o t al Su b t o t al Tr ai l Seg m en t #1 Tr ai l Seg m en t #2 Tr ai l Seg m en t #3 Junipero Serra Trail Alternative #2 Mar y Av e t o De An za B l v d De An za B l v d t o Val l c o (w es t ex t en t )Val l c o (w es t ex t en t ) t o Val l c o Pk w y 4.Asphalt removal $3.00 SF 0 $0 480 $1,440 0 $0 5.Sawcut $5.00 LF 0 $0 280 $1,400 0 $0 6.Tree removal $750.00 EA 0 $0 2 $1,500 0 $0 7.Traffic signal modification $500,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $500,000 0 $0 8.Traffic sign relocation $7,500.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $7,500 0 $0 9.Asphalt pavement $5.00 SF 0 $0 5,200 $26,000 0 $0 10.Concrete pavement $25.00 SF 0 $0 3,400 $85,000 0 $0 11.Concrete ramp $2,500.00 EA 0 $0 4 $10,000 0 $0 12.Concrete curb and gutter $70.00 LF 0 $0 200 $14,000 0 $0 13.Retaining wall, max. 4'$500.00 LF 0 $0 360 $180,000 0 $0 14.Traffic striping $5,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $5,000 0 $0 15.Relocate irrigation $25,000.00 LS Allow $0 Allow $25,000 0 $0 16.Design contingency 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $130,433 Allow $0 17.Construction contingency 10% LS Allow $0 Allow $86,955 Allow $0 18.Inflation 9% LS Allow $0 Allow $78,260 Allow $0 19.Professional Services 15% LS Allow $0 Allow $130,433 Allow $0 $0 $1,295,630 $0 $1,295,630 The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on Callander Associates' judgment at this level of document preparation and is offered only as reference data. Callander Associates has no control over construction quantities, costs and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variation may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices. B as ed o n d r aw i n g s en t i t l ed "Al t er n at i v e Al i g n m en t Pl an ", d at ed "2/20/2018" 17056_CE_Alt#2.xls © copyrighted 2016 Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc.5 of 5 Cost Estimate for Alternate #2 524 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study228 this page intentionally left blank 525 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 229Appendix Engineering Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for Box Culvert for Alternative #2 Date:24-Apr-18 Project #:617052 Project:I-280 Channel trail Prepared By:DPH Engineering Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Bid Amount 1 Earthwork (subgrade prep)SF 53240 $0.50 $26,620 TOTAL $26,620 Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Bid Amount 2 4'x4' Box Culvert LF 2686 $500.00 $1,343,000 3 8'x5' Box Culvert LF 2532 $1,250.00 $3,165,000 4 10'x6' Box Culvert LF 2224 $1,750.00 $3,892,000 TOTAL $8,400,000 Notes: EARTHWORK STORM DRAINAGE 1. This Preliminary opinion of probable construction costs should be used only as a guide. There is no responsibility assumed for fluctuations in cost or quantity of material, labor or components. 1 of 1 X:\P\617052\(4) ENGINEERING\(1) DOCUMENTS\STUDIES & REPORTS\2018-04-24 I280 Cost Estimate.xlsx Date:24-Apr-18Project #:617052Project:I-280 Channel trailPrepared By:DPHEngineering Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Bid Amount 1 Earthwork (subgrade prep)SF 53240 $0.50 $26,620 TOTAL $26,620 Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Bid Amount 2 4'x4' Box Culvert LF 2686 $500.00 $1,343,000 3 8'x5' Box Culvert LF 2532 $1,250.00 $3,165,000 4 10'x6' Box Culvert LF 2224 $1,750.00 $3,892,000 TOTAL $8,400,000 Notes: EARTHWORK STORM DRAINAGE 1. This Preliminary opinion of probable construction costs should be used only as a guide. There is no responsibility assumed for fluctuations in cost or quantity of material, labor or components. 1 of 1 X:\P\617052\(4) ENGINEERING\(1) DOCUMENTS\STUDIES & REPORTS\2018-04-24 I280 Cost Estimate.xlsx 526 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study230Appendix this page intentionally left blank 527 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 231 Enlargement LegendDe Anza BoulevardInterstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide PG&E Tower To Remain PG&E Tower To Remain Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Caltrans Easement Stairs to Bridge Over-Crossing, Typ. Bridge Approach Ramp, <5% Trailhead Plaza, Typ. Bridge Over-Crossing Traffic Light to be Relocated Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide Over Covered Channel Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Bridge Approach Ramp, <5% Utility Box to be Relocated Pull Out to be Removed Cobra Light to be Relocated Existing Property Fence, Apple 40 MPH Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Centerline Culvert Draft - De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - Bridge Over-Crossing - PG&E Tower to Remain 528 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study232 this page intentionally left blank 529 AppendixJunipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 233 Enlargement Legend 0 15’ 30’ 60’ Primary Voltage Overhead Secondary Voltage Overhead Drainage Centerline Culvert Draft - De Anza Boulevard Intersection Enlargement - Bridge Over-Crossing - PG&E Tower to be Removed De Anza BoulevardInterstate 2 8 0 O n - R a m p Intersta t e 2 8 0 O f f - R a m p Existing Caltrans Fence To Remain East Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 14’ Wide PG&E Tower To Remain Stairs to Bridge Over-Crossing, Typ. Bridge Approach Ramp, <5% Trailhead Plaza, Typ. Bridge Over-Crossing Class 1 Multi-Use Trail, 16’ Wide Over Covered Existing SCVWD Fence To Remain West Trail Spur, 10’ Wide Bridge Approach Ramp, <5% Relocated PG&E Tower PG&E Tower To Be Removed Existing Property Fence, Apple 40 MPH 530 Appendix Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study234 this page intentionally left blank 531 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 235Appendix City of Sunnyvale Comments November 12, 2018 Jennifer Chu, Associate Civil Engineer City of Cupertino Public Works 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Comments for the Draft Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study Dear Jennifer: Thank you for allowing the City of Sunnyvale to review and provide comments for the Draft Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study in the City of Cupertino. Comments concerning the draft feasibility study are as follows: 1. On pages 15 and 17, the City Limits symbol shown on the legend do not match the City Limits show on the figures. We truly appreciate your consideration of our comments in this matter. Please keep us up-to-date on any trail development. You can reach me by email at ltsang@sunnyvale.ca.gov or by phone at 408-730-7556. Sincerely, Lillian Tsang, P.E. Principal Transportation Engineer Division of Transportation and Traffic Department of Public Work Cc: Shahid Abbas, Transportation and Traffic Manager 532 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study236Appendix Caltrans Comments 533 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 237Appendix Caltrans Comments 534 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study238Appendix Caltrans Comments 535 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 239Appendix Caltrans Comments 536 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study240Appendix SCVWD Comments 537 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 241Appendix SCVWD Comments 538 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study242Appendix SCVWD Comments 539 Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study 243Appendix SCVWD Comments 540 Attachment B DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 19-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE 2019 JUNIPERO SERRA TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY CONDUCTED BY CALLANDER ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Junipero Serra Trail is consistent with General Plan: Community Vision 2015- 2040 Policy M-1.3: Regional Trail Development, Policy M-2.3: Connectivity, and Policy M-5.3: Connections to Trails; and WHEREAS, the Junipero Serra Trail is identified within the City of Cupertino 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan as a Tier 1 high priority project and a significant element of the Cupertino Loop Trail; and WHEREAS, the Junipero Serra Trail is identified within the City of Cupertino 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan as a Tier 1 high priority project ; and WHEREAS, Community outreach has occurred at the following community meetings, in which support was considerable, but concerns were raised regarding privacy, safety, street crossings and neighborhood-specific impacts:  Community Meeting #1, December 6, 2017  Community Meeting #2A, February 20, 2018  Community Meeting #2B, February 26, 2018  Community Meeting #3, June 6, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), Cal Water, Caltrans, the City of Sunnyvale, PG&E, and the Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) have been involved and provided input throughout the Feasibility Study development process; and WHEREAS, Conceptual project plans have been developed to best address concerns raised during the outreach process; and WHEREAS, approval of the Junipero Serra Trail feasibility study are to accept the findings of the study only and do not include the approval of design and/or construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino hereby approves the Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 5th day of February, 2019 by the following vote: 541 Attachment B Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ /s/ _________________________ ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Steven Scharf, Mayor 542 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Details (With Text) File #: Version:118-4780 Name: Status:Type:Reports by Council and Staff Agenda Ready File created:In control:12/20/2018 City Council On agenda:Final action:2/5/2019 Title:Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Sponsors: Indexes: Code sections: Attachments: Action ByDate Action ResultVer. City Council2/5/2019 1 Subject: Report on Committee assignments and general comments Report on Committee assignments and general comments CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 1/30/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™543