Loading...
Desk ItemsIL E -_- i .i ' '{ ' I I Il i I I _ I Beth Ebben From: Chi Yeh <ckyeh@sbcglobal.net> Y Sent: , February Tuesday, Februa 12, 2019 1:50 PM ®° To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject- Be fair to our community I understand you will have a meeting tonight with new appointed members - keep In mind, growth is trend and keep your mind open to the new trend and please don't put Cupertino behind the world ! Best, Chi Yeh Sent from my iPhone Total Control Panel LO�n To: planning@,cupertino.org Message Score: 1 High (60): E'ass From: ckyeh@sbcglobal.net My Spam Blocking Level: Custom Medium (75): E'rs Low (90): Pass Block this sender Custom (45): Pass Block sbcglobal.net This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level. 1 Beth Ebben uj,/�U� �7/u 1 From: Joe Cleaver <joepacleaver@gmail.com> � q Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:33 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. subject: Kitty. Moore Dear Commissioners, In view of the circumstances surrounding Ms Moore's background that make her ineligible to vote on planning commission issues, I strongly urge that she resign her post. Joe Cleaver 22105 Dean Court; Cupertino (408) 838-5982 Total Control Panel To: planning@cunertino org Message Score: 1 High (60): Pass From: joepacleaver@gmail.com My Spam Blocking Level: Custom Medium (75):11�,zss Low (90):.l'ass Block this sender Custom (45):.1'ass Block gmail.com This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level. 1 I Beth Ebben From- Pete Heller <peteheller@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:35 PM To- City Council Cc- City of Cupertino Planning Dept.; City Clerk, City Attorney's Office; Cupertino City Manager's Office Subject: Kitty Moore unsuited as a Planning Commission member City Council Members, Following on the heels of the mayor's imprudent and insensitive comments about building a wall around Cupertino, the City Council's selection of Kitty Moore as a Planning Commission member only adds to the city's woes. Ms. Moore has clearly been opposed to housing development at Vallco—the largest potential site for new housing in the city. There's nothing wrong with that in and of itself. However, she is also one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the City's approval of the Vallco redevelopment plan. On the basis of this alone Ms. Moore must recuse herself from all Vallco related matters coming before the Planning Commission. Hence, the commission will be 4 strong at best for the biggest and most important planning challenges the city faces. Furthermore Ms. Moore has gone so far as to posit on a Nextdoor posting that building apartments at Vallco would enable or even foster, legalized prostitution and endanger female students at Cupertino High School. Such statements are worse than.offensive. In fact they are disqualifying. Under the federal Fair Housing Act, it is illegal to discriminate in housing on the grounds of sex:_ Furthermore, under the FEHA, it is illegal to discriminate on grounds of sex, gender, or marital status in matters of housing.. These public statements by Commissioner Moore are clearly prejudicial against of sex, gender, and marital status under California housing single males. i.e., they are discriminatory on the basis law. Empaneling a planning commissioner who has a history of making remarks prejudicial on the basis of protected class goes against both state and federal housing law. Bottom line, the City Council needs to step back and rescind the commission selection of Ms. Moore to avoid further damage to the city's reputation and to enable the planning commission to operate at full strength when considering Vallco decisions. Pete Heller 30 Year resident 'Total Control .Panel To: pllanninancupertino.org From: peteheller@pacbell.net Message Score: 1 My Spam Blocking Level: Custom Block this sender Block pacbell.net This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level. High (60): Pass Medium (75):.Pass Low (90): Pass Custom (45): Pass Login 1 Beth Ebben From: mludwig417@earthlink.net Mail Account <mludwig417@earth link.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:57 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept.; City Clerk; City Council; City Attorney's Office; Cupertino City Manager's Office Subject: planning commission appointees Dear City Officials: What has happened to Cupertino? We have a mayor who proposes building a wall around this city where I have lived for 48 years. We have been a tolerate city in the past. I live in the Eichlers which were the first to allow people of color especially Asians to buy here. Our school have been noted for their scholastic achievement. Now we find that three members of the Council who are part of Better Cupertino are appointing three members to the Planning Commission who are also participants and vocal about building in Cupertino. I am appalled at the lack of discretion in this matter. While I may have voted in the past to stop Sand Hill from their first plan at Vallco I have becometorealize that something needs to be built there that certainly must have low income housing. I sincerely hope that these new council and planning commission members will be open to ideas which will help those who need to work here and are not high end earners to be able to live here. For instance teachers. Being a citizen with knowledge of good government, I really wonder what is happening to my city with all of conflict of interest happening. Marcia Ludwig Total Control Panel To: planning@a cupertino.org From: mludwig417@earthlink.net Message Score: 1 My Spam Blocking Level: Custom Block this sender Block earthlink.net This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level. High (60): Pass Medium (75):.Pass Low (90): Pass Custom (45): Pass Login Beth Ebben From: Sent: Subject: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Monday, February 11, 2019 11:03 AM FW: R-2018-20, INT-2018-01 From: Richard Oshiro [rnailto:rjoshiro@yahoo.comj 'Seat: Saturday, February 09, 2019 5:33 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. <planning@cupertino.org> Subject. R-2018-20, INT-2018-01 I lived across from this property in a 2 story home. They are a nice family who take care of their property which has a row of very tall evergreens to their north that extend well above the current roof. line. I do not see the addition as detracting, rather adding value to the neighborhood and Cupertino community. Richard Oshiro, 10530 Pineville Ave, Cupertino, CA 95014. Total Control of Panel Logm To: planning@Mertino.or Message Score: 10 High (60): Pass From: rioshiro@yahoo.com My Spam Blocking Level: Custom Medium (75): Pass Block this sender Block yahoo.com This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level. Low (90)::Pass Custom (45):=Pass 1 Commissioner More Nextdoor Posts Kitty Moore, Fairgrove - Edited 25 Feb Fran, lets ponder 1 4,000 residential emits at Vallco Shopping District --- catering to Apple Park in your micro apartments.. Apple tech workers are 80% male. That could result in 3,:200 men living at Va[[co. That vk,,ould increase the rule population from 28.771 to 31,971 and the femalelpopulatiorr from9jr53-t to 30,331. That is an 1 1% increase in the rule population and, 'a .9% increase in the ferrule population. Wit prostitution be legalised for the 3,203 males in the illca Specific Plan 4,000 Residential units editlnn2 Bars? Strip lurks? This another one forttre EUR to study -- North, Dakota's frackjpg boom is a great example of societal g.5ioes from an unbalanced population: Laps.[,(kk�,oA,li.cnbc.coml,20 77 +711'21niark-zucl��eriber-d[sco,,jiers-i.ghat-fra,ckirrg-boom'does-for- datin ..htrni Mtty lvloore, Fairgruve 26 Feb Frank, 3.200 single males living at Vallco Shopping District�ti�ithin a coulp[e hundred yards of Cupert, inoo High School. Are these underage high school females the 'you n ladfes�wM will go thereto meet apple professionals WoLfld you waint a teenage daughter visiting retail bellow a complex that had 3,200 men residing in it It's a surpervalicl question and parents near Valloo should be aware, even if It is an uinpleasant reality. And this will be reviewed in the Ells because It is an !impact on the population, eVen [if It offends you. Relevant Sections of AB 686, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Act, 2018 https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.aov/faces/bilINavClient xhtml?bill id=201720180AB686 This bill would require a public agency, as defined, to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing, and to not take any action that is materially inconsistent with this obligation, as provided. (2) "Public agency" means all of the following... (8) A city, including a charter city, county, including a charter county, city and county, and a redevelopment successor agency. [Emphasis mine] California Protected Classes Under California Fair Employment and Housing Act hftps://www.dfeh.ca.aov/eMDloyment/ • Race, color • Ancestry, national origin • Religion, creed • Age (over 40) • Disability, mental and physical • Sex, gender (including pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding or related medical conditions) • Sexual orientation • Gender identity, gender expression • Medical condition • Genetic information • Marital status • Military and veteran status 6b268b s•w•xm GRANT OF RiGIC3`4 OF WAY FOR ELECTRIC °I'Rfi.NSIbI[SSfON LINE .0 hereinafter Called the "Grantor," for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar ($1.00) in lawful money of the United States of America paid by the PACMi QGAS AND ELECTRIC GOMPANY,.a eorporation duly organized and existing under and by virtae of the laws of the State of California, hereinafter called the "Grantee," the receipt whereof is aelmowledged, does hereby grant unto the said Grantee, its successors, or assigns, the right and privilege of erecting, maintaining and.using, for the transmission and. distribution of electricity and for all pur-: poses connected therewith, a single line of poles and wires suspended thereon and all necessary and proper guys, cross -arms and braces and other fixtures for use in connection therewith, .and also a right of way. along, said line of ,poles, together with the right of ingress .thereto. and egress therefrom- along said line, over and across the Grantor's land situate in the County State of California, and more particularly described as follows: Tno qerta1v 3.5 -kw§ fight :of y s southftettrly from Sauey .1 aW fte Qa::f, aAaA*G. 4,0384tad in that *004b dud 060 awa M ft : �. & 494" -of, 2 *4.. Boasumis. W. O.da, a atd s €IV . . afue ftt it . APAW.ho d ' 8a1*a,vUM Gowbn s he. of eg0liorvins, . n .zwls,330 0 `PRO X6 The route of said line of poles and wires across said land shall be as follows: Alm& =d upon the -Boutboo, AudAryU14. ag AA zU .0,4g p .cad :lam .f :ths 9 ngt.1a therviDi`.. 1h ;dia:i<aaiga of 19.025 IbAms:, more or Isaoh The Grantee is also hereby granted the right to trim any trees along said line of poles and wires whenever considered by it .necessary for the complete enjoyment of the rights hereby granted, gn WitUe.09 Whereof, the Grantor has executed these presents this_--- __day of Executed in the Presence of _ Wiiness. t i ®I Q N O 9� N ;_Y7 P4 D W ��11 QA �, •�, _ �, S Q cfJ -•� i`QIi � V�l N �0 �' :r• t 1 I p �, `J �� — 1 Y earl t� Fi•i .. - oaf _: L+u F — °•�U:.,J -j �t It 4 ci �., STATE OF CALIFORNIA ......... County of �Santa__Clara_. ) On this 7— a of A,D. One Thousand Nine Hundred and ____ QjXtY..... before y-.-_-.. a Notary public in and for said County, �-• S- �-..- -- residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn per"naily appeared____________________________ L. R. BRIT+ON --•............................•--••-- •--- .............................. ................ known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, as a witness thereto, who, beinC by me duly sworn, deposed and said, that he resides _in San T-"e -__e ._........ ., that he vas present and sari..... ............................... .. - ................. ER1SE$ _?N�i. .__9 •--------------------- ...... _(personally known to him to be the person__,__ described in and who executed the said instrument, as -,,art .... thereto), thereto), sign and execute the same, and that the said ......... - - duly acknowledged in the prasence of said af,fiant, t hat_S.he ___executed the same, and that he; the -..said affient, thereupon and at. request, subscribed his name as a witness thereto-. IN FITNESS 1711EREO ', I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at my office-, in the said County of Santa Clara , the day and year in this, certificUefirst ab +�ritten`, 0, ------- - �./yl_---•-- TARY PUBLIC OF THE STATE OF. CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUTIT OF SA2?. CLaRA.