CC 11-15-99 AGENDA
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR MEETING
CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING
10300 Tone Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber
Monday, November 15, 1999
6:45 p.m.
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS
Proclamations to Optimist clubs recognizing Youth Appreciation Week.
POSTPONEMENTS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1. Request from Mr. Leonard Huflon to modify the City's annexation policy relative to the
requirement to annex newly developed properties contiguous to a city boundary.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion.of thc meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter
not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit
the council fi.om making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. '
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff, or a member of
the public, it is requested that items 2 through 15 be acted on simultaneously.
2. Minutes: November 1, 1999 regular meeting.
3. Accounts payable:
(a) October 29, 1999, Resolution No. 99-329
Co) November 5, 1999, Resolution No. 99-330
4. Payroll: October 29, 1999, Resolution No. 99-331.
5. Approving the 1999-2000 Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) Funding Allocation,
Resolution No. 99-332.
Page 2 Cupertino City Council & November 15, 1999
Cupertino Redevelopment Center
6. Review of applications for Alcoholic Beverage Control license: (a) Rags and Friends, 19979 Stevens Creek Boulevard
(b) Green Valley Liquors, 10073 Saich Way
7. Tank Protect Engineering of Northern California, Inc.: Change order No. 1, fuel tank
replacements, Pwject No. 98-117, Resolution No. 99-333.
8. Grant of easement, roadway, C.I.W. Trust, Diana Wong, Trustee, 10067 Bianchi Way,
APN 359-07-009, Resolution No. 99-334.
9. Improvement agreements:
(a) Ben Shyy and Monica H. Sun, 19028 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 375-11-071,
Resolution No. 99-335
Co) Xuan Ngoc Nguyen and Nguyet-Lan Thi Vu, 22056 Wallace Dr., APN 326-03-
041, Resolution No. 99-336
(c) C.I.W. Trust, Diana Wong, Trustee, 10067 Bianchi Way, APN 359-07-009,
Resolution No. 99-337
10. Quitclaim deed, Xuan Ngoc Nguyen and Nguyet-Lan Thi Vu, 220:56 Wallace Dr., APN
326-03-041, Resolution No. 99-338.
11. Acceptance of municipal improvements: Sobrato Dev. Co., 19310 Pruneridge Avenue.
12. Authorizing execution of the revised Memorandum of Agreement for the Santa Clara
Valley Urban RunoffPollution Prevention Program, Resolution No. 99-339.
13. Approving re-issuance of the City of Cupertino's Municipal Storm Water NPDBS Permit,
Resolution No. 99-340.
14. Resolution of intention to approve an amendment to a contract between the Board of
Administration of the California Public Employees Retirement System and the City of
Cupertino, Resolution No. 99-341.
15. Resolution extending the deadline for receiving arguments and rebuttals related to the
library ballot measure in March 2000, Resolution No. 99-342.
16. Report from Fine Arts Commission regarding grants.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
17. Public hearing to consider the proposed use of $25,$29.00 of Public Safety Block Grant
Funds for the Public Dialogue Consortium discussions on community safety, Resolution
No. 99-343.
November 15, 1999 Cupertino City Council & Page 3
Cupertino Redevelopment Center
18. Ordering vacation of roadway easement, 10201 Hillerest Rd., APN 326-16-060,
Resolution No. 99-344.
19. Public hearing concerning a nuisance on parcel 375-27-025, 18781 Tuggle Avenue,
overgrown weeds in the front and side yards, Resolution No. 99-345.
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
20. Santa Barbara Grill site - 10745 North De Anza Boulevard. Request to initiate a public
hearing for a general plan amendment to allow existing commercial retail site to be
developed as office space.
21. Appeal of the Planning Commission decision regarding applications 8-U-99 and 21-EA-
99 of HOK Architects (for Symantec Corporation). The application requested a use
permit to construct a 1,750 sq. fi. addition (Learning Center) to an existing office building
located at 20330 Torte Avenue. (Mayor Wally Dean, appellant.) (Continued from
November 1.)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
22. Consideration of a letter from Marc G. Hynes, Esq., attorney for Steven D. Hoffman,
appealing the decision of the city manager regarding use of city park facilities by the
Cupertino Unified School District for commercial day care center operations.
ORDINANCES
Second reading and enactments off
23. Ordinance No. 1837, "An Ordinance of the City Council of thc City of Cupertino
Amending Section 11.34 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Roadway Design
Features, Section 11.34.010, Relating to Road Bump-Definition."
24. Ordinance No. 1838, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Amending Section 11.34 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Roadway Design
Features, Section 11.34.020, Relating to Administrative Authority."
25. Ordinance No. 1839, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
Amending Section 11.34 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Roadway Design
Features, Section 11.34.030, Relating to Establishment of Warrants for the Installation
and Maintenance of Road Bumps."
26. Ordinance No. 1840, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the city of Cupertino
Amending Cupertino Municipal Code chapter 11.24.150 Relating to Parking Prohibition,
Chapter 11.24.160 Relating to parking Prohibition during Certain Hours on the East and
Page 4 Cupertino City Council & November 15, 1999
Cupertino Redevelopment Center
West Sides of Mary Avenue, and Chapter 11.24.180 Relating to Diagonal Parking on the
West Side of Mary Avenue."
27. Ordinance No. 1841, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the city of Cupertino
Amending Section 11.20.020 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Establishment
of Vehicular Stop and Section 11.20.030, All Directional Vehicular Stop Required at
Certain Intersections to Include Bahl street at the Intersection of Ainsworth Drive, Kondle
Street at the Intersection of Ainsworth Drive, and Carta Blanca Street at the Intersection
of Ainsworth Drive."
STAFF REPORTS
28. Human Services funding - preliminary report.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Dean:
Cupertino Audit Committee
Economic Development Team - Alternate
Environmental Review Committee
Legislative Review Committee
Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission
Santa Clara County Solid Waste Committee
West Valley Mayors and City Managers
Vice-Mayor Statton:
Association of Bay Area Governments - Alternate
Economic Development Team
Public Dialog Liaison
Santa Clara County Committee on Housing and Community Development Block Grant
Program - Alternate
Santa Clara County Library IPA Board
Sister City Committee- Toyokawa
West Valley Mayors and City Managers - Alternate
Councilmember Bumett:
Environmental Review Committee - Alternate
Library Expansion Committee
North Central and Northwest Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee
Santa Clara County Cities Association Representative, ABAG Board of Directors
Santa Clara County Committee on Housing and Community Block Grant Program
Santa Clara County Library IPA Board - Alternate
Santa Clara County Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee
Santa Clara Valley Water Commission
Senior Center Expansion Design Committee
November 15, 1999 Cupertino City Council & Page
Cupertino Redevelopment Center
Councilmember Chang:
Association of Bay Area Governments
Joint Venture Silicon Valley Public Sector Round Table - Alternate
Leadership Cupertino
Legislative Review Committee
Library Expansion Committee
Public Dialog Liaison
Santa Clara County Cities Association
Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission - Alternate
Councilmember James:
Cupertino Audit Committee
Economic Development Team
Leadership Cupertino
Santa Clara County Cities Association - Alternate
Santa Clara County Drug and Alcohol Board
Senior Center Expansion Design Committee
CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
To November 17, 6:00 p.m., in the City Council chambers. The purpose of the meeting will be to
swear in a new council member and to elect a new mayor and vice-mayor.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
ROLL CALL
CEREMONIAL MATTERS & PRESENTATIONS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF
CUPER TINO
Agenda No. / Agenda Date: November 15, 1999
Request from Mr. Leonard HuRon to modify the City's annexation policy relative to the
requirement to annex newly developed properties contiguous to a city boundary.
Mr. HuRon submitted an application for a building permit in the county tbr property located at
10322 North Stclling Road. Please refer to the attached location map tbr the location of the
property. Mr. Hufton was apparently unaware of the county ordinance that requires annexation
of redeveloping properties contiguous to city boundaries. He also was unaware of the city's
policy regarding annexation of said properties. Mr. Hufton is obviously concerned about the
'additional delay resulting from thc pre-zoning application and annexation. Although the City of
Cupertino's planning staffhas not reviewed the plans, there may also be issues involving the size
and design of the building.
Mr. Hufton argues that the incremental annexation of Gardengate is inappropriate and is also
inconsistent with the City's policy to annex large, contiguous blocks. My response to Mr.
Hufton dated October 25 is attached to this report. The annexation of this parcel is consistent
with City and County policy. Therefore staff recommends that council not change its poi icy to
allow this property to re-develop in the county.
SUBMITTED BY: SUBMITTED BY:
Robert S. Cowan, Director of Don Brown, City Manager
Community Development
Enclosures:
Mr. Leonard Hufton letter dated October 18, 1999
Memorandum for Robert Cowan to the City Council dated October 25, 1999
(with attachments)
Location Map
8/planninf/cc/hultou
/-/
s~,intan nn Plaeval~l P~er
Greater Bay Construction
4125 Blackford Ave · Ste 200 · San Jose, CA 95117 · 408 248-3636 · Fax 408-248-3667
October lS, 1999 ,'
I OCT 1 9 1999
City Council
City of Cupertino
.10300 Torte Avenue·
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Re: 10322 North Stelling Road, Cupertino
APN 326-30-089
Honorable Councilmembers,
On August 8, 1999 an application was filed with the County (plan check #14027) to
construct a new home at the above location. This home is similar to a house we built at
10214 North Stelling, which was approved by County Planning on October 5, 1998.
We were only recently informed on October 12, 1999, that the above application cannot
proceed and the property must be annexed to the City prior to development. The facts
pertaining to this property are:
1) It is within the Garden Gate unincorporated area.
2) It is within Cupertino's urban service area.
3) No formal city initiated annexation process has begun for the Garden Gate area.
We' feel this requirement for annexation cfa single parcel is unjustified and arbitrary, and
respectfully appeal this demand on the following grounds:
1) This requirement directly conflicts with Principle #2b of the City's annexation
strategy, approved on February 2, 1998. It states, "Annexation of Garden Gate ......
should generally occur in large, contiguous blocks and not on a piecemeal basis".
2) As further pointed out in the directive, "incremental'' annexing of single parcels will
result in fragmented and confusing ("checkerboard") annexation patterns in the area.
Why should one house be in the City and another in the County if they are side by
side? Under this policy, adjacent homes may never be annexed. It makes better
sense to annex an entire pocket area to maintain consistent service levels and
development standards. (Rancho Rinconada is a recent example).
3) The forced annexation deprives us, the property owner, of our right to a voice in the
annexation process; once the parcel is in the City limits, we have no right to vote' for
or against annexation.
- ..'"cECEIVED
City Council O(~T 1 9 1999
October 1 i, 1999
Page 2 "'~.
4) Our previous home at 10214 North Stelling was not subject to annexation. We
proceeded with the purchase and development of the herein-referenced property
based on its location and the approval of our other house. Much time and money has
been spent on the permit process thus far; it would be an extreme hardship to go
through an imposed annexation and then start from zero on the house design plans. A
delay of 6 - 8 months will create further financial hardship for us, as we are just a
small, local builder.
In closing, we sincerely request that you review Cupertino's annexation strategy and the
basis for our appeal. A more logical and orderly approach to annexing Garden Gate area
would be to follow the steps taken in the successful annexation of the Rancho Rinconada.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at (408) 248-3636.
Sincerely,
Greater Bay Construction
Project Manager
LH/kl
City or'Cupertino
M1r. MORANDUM
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 408-777-3308 FAX 408-777-3333
Date: October 2:5, 1999
To: Mayor Dean and City Councilmembers
From: Robert Cowan, Director of Community Development
RE: Annexation Requirement of 10322 North Stelling Road, Cupertino
APN 326-30-089 (Garden Gate)
I am responding to a letter you received, dated October 18, 1999 from a Mr. Leonard I-iuf~on oi'
Greater Bay Construction, concerning the City's annexation requirement prior to the
redevelopment of a residential lot on North Stelling Road in unincorporated Garden Gate
(Exhibit A). First, I would like to offer a more detailed sequence of events leading up to the
annexation requirement from staff's perspective and second, address the annexation issue
directly.
Sequence of Events
I have verified this information with Ms. Carolyn Walsh, who is in charge of development
coordination at Santa Clam County and Ms. Carmen Lynaugh, Public Works Manager, at the
City of Cupertino. All events are documented in written records.
Date Event Description
August 26, 1999 Greater Bay Construction/Pan-.Cai files a building permit with thc
County to build a new home on the North Stelling Road lot.
September 21, 1999 County informs building permit applicant o[' potential city
requirement for annexation and refers applicant to Cupertino
for annexation determination, using the standard [bm~ titled
"General Plan Conformance and Contiguity/Annexation
Statement" (see Exhibit B).
october 8, 1999 A representative of OB (Greater Bay?) Estate Homes delivers
the form to Cupertino staff more than two weeks later and seeks
a determination whether the City will require annexation (F-xhibit
B).
October 12, 1999 City Public Works Staffeomplete form and notify' Mr. I-lullon that
project is major and qualifies for annexation prior to development.
Building application may not be filed with the County (Exhibit 13).
Annexation Policy
The City has been prezoning and annexing individual lots in Garden Gate since October ! 907.
eight lots have been prezoned and six of them have been annexed to the City so tar.
Procedurally, all of the lots have followed the Same Pro(~ess as the applicant's property. Thc
property owners inquired about building in the County and County staff determined thc
"annexability" of the property to the City. If the property was annexable, the applicant was
referred to City staff who decided, based on Council direction, whether the property should bc
annexed prior to development. All of the annexed lots are contiguous to the City's boundaries
and involve reasonable to no right-of-way annexation as directed by City Council.
Following the numbered points in the applicant's letter:
I. This particular annexation, practice for Garden Gate does not conflict with "Principle #2b"
which was adopted by the City Council on February 2, 1998 when it adopted a citywide
annexation strategy. The full text of Principle #2b of)he City Annexation Strategy reads:
"Annexation of Garden Gate should generally occur in large, contiguous Mocks and not on tt
piecemeal basis. Parcel-by.parcel annexation should only lie cortvidered by the City when it
results in logical City boundaries which are easy to service and does not cruttte ttdditiont4l
pockets."
2. While an incremental annexation program is laborious for staffand applicants, it is being
done in the most logical pattern possible by annexing just around the edges which minimizes
City service impacts and jurisdictional confusion. At the same time this strategy al lows thc
City to control the redevelopment that most affects City residents while main'mining a
ongoing annexation presence in the neighborhood until the City can mount a larger
annexation effort in the furore.
3. Yes, this is a mandatory annexation requirement. 30+ years ago. Santa Clam County and thc
cities agreed that urban development should take place in the cities, not the County, and that
cities should annex existing pockets of County development. The County implements this
policy by requiring developers to seek annexation to the abutting city whenever significant
rebuilding is proposed.
4. 10214 North Stelling Road is a similarly situated property that should have been subject to
annexation aa well. A search of City records indicates no evidence ora County annexation
referral. It. appears to be a County oversight in processing a building permit tbr this property.
Staffis committed to easing the time burden on the applicant and is open to concurrent
processing of discretionary and building permits whenever possible. Afl. er speaking to
County staff, they are agreeable to refunding most of the applicant's building permit
application fees.
H:worddo/stellin~2
Exhibit A
Greater Bay Construction
4125 Blackford Ave · Sr.e 200 · San Jose. CA 95117 · 408 248-3636 · Fax 408-248-3867
October 18, 1999
City Council [ OCT 1 9 1999
City of Cupertino
10300 Tone Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Re: 10322 North Stelling Road, Cupertino
APN 326-30-089
Honorable Councilmembcrs,
On August 8, 1999 an application was filed with the County (plan check #14027) to
construct a new home at thc above location. This home is similar to a house we built at
10214 North Stelling, which was approved by County Planning on October 5, 1998.
We were only recently informed on October 12, 1999, that thc above application cannot
proceed and the property must be annexed to the City prior to development. The facts
pertaining to this property are:
1) It is within the Garden Gate unincorporated area.
2) It is within Cupertino's urban service area.
3) No formal city initiated annexation process has begun for the Garden Gate· area.
We feel this requirement for annexation of'a single parcel is unjustified and arbitrary, and
re'spcctfully appeal this demand on thc following groun, ds:
1) This requirement directly conflicts with Principle #2b of the City's annexation
strategy, approved on February 2, 1998. It states, 'Annexation of Garden Gate ......
should generally occur in large, contiguous blocks and not on a piecemeal basis".
2) As further pointed out in the directive, "incremental" annexing of single pam¢ls will
result in fragmented and confusing ("checkerboard") annexation patterns in the area.
Why should one house bc in thc City and another in the County if'they ar~ side by
side? Under this policy, adjacent homes may never be annexed. It makes better
sense to annex an entire pocket area to maintain consistent service levels and
development standards. 0;rancho Rinconada is a recent example).
3) The forced annexation deprives us, the property owner, of our right to a voice in the
annexation process; once the parcel is in the City limits, we have no right to vote for
or against annexation.
.... ECEIVED
City Council
October 18. 1999 OCT l ~ I~SS
Page 2 .','.
4) Our previous home at 10214 North Stelling was not subject to annexation. We
proceeded with the purchase and developmen~ of the herein-referenced property
based on its location and the approval of our other house. Much time and money has
been spent on the permit process thus far; it would be an extreme hardship to go
through an imposed annexation and then start from zero on the house design plans. A
delay of 6 - 8 months will create further financial hardship for us, as we are just a
small, local builder.
In closing, we sincerely request that you review Cupertino's annexation strategy and the
basis for our appeal. A more logical and orderly approach to annexing Garden Gate area
would be to follow the steps taken in the successful annexation of thc Rancho Rinconada.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at (408) 248-3636.
Sincerely,
Greater Bay Construction
Leonari~
Project Manager
LH/kl
.. ~ _ ~-~--~---~ . ~ ,..~, ...... ~,..,..~ .......
.e- : ~./S3 f~ [~ ~' "~ ~' ff ~-L'., ~ ~ /~ ~m~-,~ 'i i~
";. ~4 . . ...... ~ ......... ~'' e--''~'
' ~ ~ -- - .... ~ ..... ~--. ~ I ' · ~ ~ ~w ....
i~ m,,,.~ ~ i' ~"~"~' '~ ii ~-~-~ q j~ .-,~,-,. rl p ~' ~ _., ~ ~ ,.- .'..
.. ...... . - ..... t' . . .... "----. ~ ......... .r"' ....~ ............ . . I~__=s.~/~.~ P ffi . -.11
i; ~- _';~; :~ Il ~,,~-~ ~i I~ ~-~-~ g II ~ ,, ,,,,~ [~ J, ~- ----,--~~--"1"--"%,.
~i~ re-'il:,_,i' m",i "w'l I~ m.;.~ ti i' ~-'",. ti It~'.r'''--'~'
~" . ' ~ ti ' . ......L ........' ~' ~ ·" -- ; ' . .... ~,'~ ~1111 I · ~J l'lJ
. . ............................................ --
:, :.-..--- t rig. " , ~ · t t i ..[Jtt I J .....
..... , · . ~ . . , --~J ..........
~ I ~ ~]q ...-- .l Hame O~I · .-J~J u . i i l-- ---- .4~II qll . ! Iii
~--' ~ '-~'--~'I~C.--' ~ ......... ; ......... ~ ......... · ............. ~q. I m~ '1 J' ~ ' ~
~., ~. ~w ~; u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ]~ --.~ ....... m"'- ....
~ In ~ Il J .. , ..~ .... j' , J I ~_ I .~ I~~r I ~"1 -- Il Il ~I ,. J Il
--'l --'ql'T~'. ~l ' I~ I I I J ] i J i ~I fib ~ q~ ·
g --~,--~ ' I --~-'t'-~'" u ~ L ~ ~' td~;~l~ al 'a ~, jl~ a' ,i '
~ ~ ~ ~ i u ; u , -d , u I ~ ~,.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ! w I~ I n ~ r ~, -- , m '1~' '~
It ~a .Ir---.t .......... r'--T .... ~.--u.-l. ~ ~ ~/ ~ ..... ~ .... t'x- n t r t , _ , .. J
I ~1 .Ii- -- j -- ',j 'j J J J I Ii II II IJ J I '' 'J
.... ..~.~,., --.- _... -~ ~.,,.-~'--~... ....
· ' EXHIBIT B
'l'
.--. -: cOU~
General Plan Conformance and ~,~~~/ ~~~
Contiguity/Annexation Statement' ~~
Planning Offic~
General Plan Conformance Conti~ui~!
I I
STEP 1: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
Applicant Information · · Property Description -
· ?~g ~ - ~oo ~g Use
STEP 2: TO BE COMPLETED BY COUNTY STAFF
General Plan Conformance Contiguity/Annexation
~'~ · Subdivision F-~ Architectural a~d Site Approval
[--] Zone _~--se ['-[ B~UtiaS Si,-AVprov~ (adataon~
~ U~
STEP 3: TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Plan Conformance Confi~uity! Annexation
lle~Ht~ may b~ filed) ·
Project does not qualify ~'
(~:p~-~-~on way not bo filed)
Garden Ga-:e
' Location Map
.----- JUNIPERO SERRA
, . ~ -- ~ Fxhibit A-1
-- - . . ,. 2-Z-99 Pro P g ........
IIIIIII %
jw-, ( ,'"" I ....... /--- ... SCH
· "~ \ I -I _.-~
Unincorporated Areas Include Shaded Properties and Internal Streets.
MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Monday, November 1, 1999
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
6:45 p.m. Mayor Dean called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre
Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
City Council members present: Mayor Wally Dean, Vice-Mayor John Statton, and Council
members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Sandra lames. Council members absent: None.
Staff prcsent: City Manager Don Brown, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Administrative Services
Director Carol Atwood, Community Development Director Bob Cowan, Parks and Recreation
Director Steve Dowling, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Dean remembered Mr. Saleem Shaikh, Vice-Chairperson, Parks and Recreation
Commission, who had recently passed away.
POSTPONEMENTS - None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Floyd Meyer, 10186 Westacres Drive, discussed the malfunctioning traffic gate on Kim
Street, and suggested that if it won't, close automatically a civil servant should be assigned to
close it manually. He also discussed the traffic ticket process.
Ms. Anna Polman-Black, 21118 Gardena Drive, discussed the current council campaigns and
asked if there had been a violation of the Ralph M. Brown Act. The City Attorney said that three
council members met to discuss campaign issues but nothing was discussed that would
foreseeably come before the city council. Therefore, there was no violation of the Brown Act,
and to prohibit such a meeting would have been a restriction of free speech.
CONSENT CALENDAR
lames moved to appwve the items on the consent calendar as presented, with the exception of
item Nos. l, 7, and 1 l, which were pulled for further discussion. Statton seconded and the
motion carried 5-0.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 2
2. Accounts payable: (a) October 15, 1999, Resolution No. 99-310
(b) October 22, 1999, Resolution No. 99-311
3. Payroll: October 15, 1999, Resolution No. 99-312.
4. Monthly Treasurer's and Budget Report - September 1999.
5. Improvement agreements:
(a) Chandravadan N. Patel & Aarti C. Patel, 10220 Dubon Ave., APN 342-14-051,
Resolution No. 99-313
(b) Kenneth A. Clark, 10151 Amelia Ct., APN 326-17-022, Resolution No. 99-314
(c) Hossain E. Khaziri and Christine V. Khaziri, 10002 N. De Anza Boulevard, APN
316-26-017, Resolution No. 99-317
6. Quitclaim deeds:
(a) Chandravadan N. Patel & Aarti C. Patel, 10220 Dubon Ave., APN 342-14-051,
Resolution No. 99-315
Co) Kenneth A. Clark, 10151 Amelia Ct., APN 326-1%022, Resolution No. 99-316
8. Approving appropriation from the General Fund for local match.
9. Review of application for Alcoholic Beverage Control license for Dar's Hideaway, 10095
Saich Way.
10. Setting date for consideration of reorganization of area designated "N. Stelling Road 99-
06," property located on the west side of lq. Stelling Road between Gardena Drive and
GreenleafDrive, approximately 0.24 acre, Seet (APN 326-08-051), Resolution 99-324.
12. Electing to. comply with certain animal sheltering provisions set forth under state law in
effect on June 30, 1999, pursuant to the terms of AB 1482 (Alquist), Resolution No. 99-
326.
13. Acceptance of municipal improvements:
(a) Parviz Namvar, Phase H, Miramonte at Stevens Canyon Road, APN 356-01-036
and 037
(b) SCS Development Co., Citation Homes Phase HI (16 lots, 140 units), Tract No.
9797, APN 316-01-122
(c) SNK Arioso LP, West Side Wolfe Road ~ Pruneridge, Tract No. 8990, Tandem
Site (201-unit apartments).
14. Authorizing execution of agreement with Santa Clara Valley Water District for removal
of graffiti, Resolution No. 99-327.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 3
15. Confirmation of amended wording in Resolution 99-308, "A Resolution of the Cupertino
City Council Calling for a Special Municipal Election for the Purpose of Submitting a
Measure before the Qualified Voters."
Vote Councilmembers
Ayes: Bumett, Chang, Dean, James, and Statton
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Abstain: None.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes: October 18, 1999, regular meeting.
The City Clerk amended page 18, first and second paragraphs, to correct the names of
those who offered motions. James moved and Statton seconded to approve the minutes
as amended. The motion carried 5-0.
7. Grants of easement:
(a) Roadway, Kenneth A. Clark, 10151 Amelia Ct., APN 326-17-022, Resolution No.
'-' 99-318
Co) Sidewalk, Hossain E. Khaziri and Christine V. Khaziri, 10002 N. De Anza
Boulevard, APN 316-26-017, Resolution No. 99-319
(c) Roadway, Hossain E. Khaziri and Christine V. Khaziri, 10002 N. De Anza
Boulevard, APN 316-26-017, Resolution No. 99-320
(d) Landscape, Hossain E. Khaziri and Christine V. Khaziri, 10002 N. De Anza
Boulevard, APN 316-26-017, Resolution No. 99-321
(e) Public Art, Hossain E. Khazifi and Christine V. Khaziri, 10002 N. De Anza
Boulevard, APN 316-26-017, Resolution No. 99-322
Bert Viskovich, Public Works Director, explained that these easements were to create a
fourth traffic lane and a bicycle lane. Burnett moved and James seconded to approve the
grants of easement. The motion carried 5-0.
11. Setting public hearing for abandonment of emergency vehicle access easement, parcels 2
and 3, 22831 Mercedes Road, Resolution No. 99-325.
Bert Viskovich, Public Works Director, said that this easement could be abandoned now
that other access is available. All interested parties must agree to the release of this
easement. Burnett moved and James seconded to set the public hearing for this item. The
motion carried 5-0.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 4
PUBLIC HEARINGS
16. Consideration of appeals, Application 4-ASA-99 - Public hearing to reconsider appeals
filed by Mr. Erh-Kong and Ms. Ding-Wei Chieh and Dr. Nancy and Mr. Henry Adelman.
The application requested architectural and site approval to allow the construction of first
and second story additions to an existing one-story duplex located at 10333 Degas Court,
Resolution No. 99-328. (Petition for rehearing filed by the Law Offices of Owen Byrd. -
continued fi.om meeting of September 7.)
Community Development Director Bob Cowan reviewed the staff report. He said that the
Chiehs had signed a letter saying they understood the risk in. continuing to build even
though there was an appeal pending on the project. They have applied a stucco coat, the
roof, and made some internal impwvements, and the building is consistent with height
requirements. The Chiehs and the Adehnans have also reached an agreement about
landscaping with hedges instead of trees.
Mr. Adelman, 10333 Degas Court, showed some overheads taken since July, that he said
illustrated that the height will not be reduced by 2 feet, as claimed, and that the location
of the windows and roof lines are not consistent with approved plans. He said that the
proceedings were biased because the partially constructed building influenced the
council's decision. He also said that the Pla~ning Commission incorrectly interpreted the
35% rule and the Council did not systematically evaluate evidence related to findings.
Mr. Adelman said the Council rendered a decision in which findings were not supported
by the evidence, that the project will be detrimental to property in the vicinity, and the
design will not protect residents from noise, traffic, light, and visually intrusive impacts.
Mr. Rich Abdalah, representing the Chiehs, said that 'he had been in error about the
height, which had been lowered one foot, but noted that the roof is at the height that was
approved. The maximum height is 30 feet, and this roof will be just over 23 feet. The
Chiehs have also made an effort to come in under the maximums in all instances.
Mr. Chieh said that after a recent electrical fire in the neighborhood caused by tall trees,
the Chiehs and Adelmans came to an agreement that they would prefer a variety of tall
shrub instead of trees for landscaping. The Chiehs will install the tallest possible variety
that is readily available, but they are not sure they can meet the minimum size of 15
gallon, 6-foot height plant.
James said she would prefer to keep to the minimum height already specified for the
landscaping. Bumett said he had used a pittosporum shrub in .his back yard, and it was
fast growing and is a good choice.
Ms. Alice Ho, 22773 Voss Avenue, said her unit adjoins the Chieh's property, and she
appreciated being given a choice of landscaping to improve privacy. She also said she
found the addition to be a beautiful building.
November I, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 5
Ms. Nancy Adelman, 10333 Degas Court, said she also appreciated that they were given
a choice in the selection of the landscaping, and she agreed that the hedge would be a
better choice than trees. The pittosporum is also somewhat fire-resistant and drought-
resistant. She said she could obtain the information on a couple of nurseries that carry
large-gallon plants.
Bumett said it is important to be consistent, and all of the values important to people need
to be balanced against people's fights to develop their property. Council spent a great
deal of time working on second-story limitations to reduce impacts on neighbors, and this
project conforms to those limitations. The solution'seems to be a fair one overall, and he
was in favor of denying the appeal and approving the project.
Statton said that he would support the original requirement for a certain height and size of
landscaping.
James says she understands the Adelman's frustration because they would prefer not to
have a second-story building on the side of their house but council has done their best to
find a compromise, and she's in favor of denying thc appeal.
Chang said that all the modifications and mitigations that have been made will improve
the privacy of the neighboring family, and it seems the owners and neighbors have
arrived at a workable compromise.
Burnett moved to deny the appeal and approve the application. James seconded and the
motion carried 5-0.
The City Attorney referred to draft Resolution No. 99-328, which lists findings which are
more detailed than what was discussed, and which address the issues raised in the letter
from the Adelmans' attorney. He asked that council confirm these findings by adopting
the resolution, or by making any desired changes. James moved to adopt Resolution No.
99-328. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0.
James moved to amend condition No. 3 of the council action letter of July 22 related to
landscaping. It will be amended to require the planting of shrubs instead of trees. The
shrubs shall be one of the pittosporum species agreeable to the parties involved. Bumett
seconded and the motion carried 5-0.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 6
17. Consideration of appeal of the Planning Commission decision regarding Applications 8-
U-99 and 21-U-99 of HOK Architects (for Symantec Corporation). The application
requested a use permit to construct a 1,750 sq. ft. addition (Learning Center) to an
existing office building located at 20330 Torte Avenue. (Mayor Wally Dean, appellant).
The Community Development Director reviewed the report. He said that the City Center
is built out in terms of office development. The General Plan does permit development
above the floor area ratio limitations if the space is to be used for an employee amenity.
In this case the applicants wish to remove 6,000 square feet of office space and replace
that with a cafeteria and learning center. The learning center will be an additional one-
story building in a circular design.
Dean said that the proposed location of this building is currently a pleasant open space
with a fountain and seating. He was objecting to the architectural layout of the proposed
building. He asked what other options there are to obtain the same goals but retain an
airy structure with a lot of glass. He discussed a number of other drawings that the
architects had provided which would allow more space for the fountain. He noted that
the intersection of Torre and Rodrigues has been changed so .traffic can turn in all
directions; it is now a very attractive, swinging curve past this area. He wanted the new
building to be good-looking and to be representative of that free movement.
Mr. Richard Dowd, 71 Stevenson Street, Ste. 2200, Representing HOK Architects, said
they were privileged to have an opportunity to come back and make additions to a
building that they had designed 14 years ago. He distributed copies of alternative layouts
and discussed them in more detail. They are looking for a solution which will meet the
client's needs, be a compact form, minimize the impact on the open space, and still be a
graceful addition. The existing office building four stories, and the proposed addition
will be 15 feet in height. The entry shown on the design is a secondary entry and will
create a more informal place for employees.
Burner asked if there is any possibility of saving the trees that would be removed during
construction. Mr. Paul Lettieri, landscape architect, said the trees may be 1Jansplanted
depending upon the'time of year, although they will need to be pruned. They could be
placed on the edge ofthe property in the existing tree orchard and would match fairly
well in size. Otherwise, the trees would have to stored somewhere else during
construction.
Mr. Dowd said they planned to retain the fountain regardless of which alternative is
chosen because its location completes the circular planting pattern of the trees.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 7
James asked about their plans for allowing public use of the learning center. Mr. Jeff
Birdwell, of Saris Regis, Symantec's development advisor, presented a copy of a letter
from Mr. Sorci of Symantec about the allowable public uses. James said that she had
hoped this space would be available to public education and nonprofit agencies that can
normally not afford use that kind of facility. She asked whether it was necessary that the
event be city sponsored. Mr. Birdwell said that would not be a requirement, their letter
had simply been modeled after a similar agreement between the city and Apple
Computers.
Bumett said that he had also appealed this project because he objected to the rationale for
allowing extra amenity space. The provision was intended to allow people to build above
the allotted floor area ratio to encourage amenity space. This project, as well as the
whole development, are already far over the floor area ratio and will probably eventually
be built out to three times the floor area ratio for industrial office development. Since the
original 1984 plan there's been another extra Symantec building put upon De Anza
Boulevard, an area across the street designated as private open space was developed as
housing, plus a hotel and fairly large number of apartments are yet to come. He did not
feel the project was consistent with the general plan, and that it is inappropriate to apply
the amenity space pwvision. Burnett said this new building will take away some open
space, and he suggested as compensation the developer install a planted median on Torte
Avenue. He noted that public use of the facility as pwposed by Council Member James
is a nice idea, but can be very difficult to work out in practice. Bumett said this would
be a harmonious addition, but he would only support it if they planted the median.
Statton agreed with the median idea. Since Council removed the turning restrictions at
the intersection, it is becoming more widely used and it may be wise to slow down traffic.
He also noted that there is a sensitive population living across the street, and asked that
construction hours not begin until 8 a.m.
James said she had been opposed to the new Symantec building on De Anza Boulevard
because of the additional square footage density. However, she is in favor of this
addition, and preferred the design as originally proposed. She was interested in the
planted median idea. She understood Burnott's point about amenity space, but Symantec
has fulfilled the needs specified by council and this building will go onto ground covered
in hard surface, not a green space.
Chang said this addition will be fairly large and he thought the mitigations suggested in
tonight's discussion were appropriate, along with making the building available for the
community. He agreed with Dean that they should preserve as much open space as
possible, but preferred the original design.
· - Discussion followed regarding the potential median improvements. Burnett said that his
intent would be that the landscaped median would extend only as far as Symantec's
property limits.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 8
Mr. Dowd said they had explored the possibility of doing a landscaped median but it is
not financially feasible to do with this addition. If that condition were to be imposed,
Symantec would not go forward with this project. Statton asked if there could be cuts in
the middle of the street to place the trees. Mr. Lettieri said that it becomes a public works
issue at.that point because there may be traffic safety implications.
Mr. Sorci, representing Symantec, said they have spent a lot of time and money looking
at alternatives at the request of the city council, and have negotiated on this quite a bit.
The beginning of the project has been delayed for a number of months for a variety of
reasons and he was concerned that discussions about a median will delay it even more.
There are also funding constraints that would impact a change in schedule. Symantec is
willing to plant trees, and they have already made a substantial donation to the park at the
comer. They have been good corporate neighbors and now will allow community groups
to use their new facility. He said they would be willing to work with the city to perhaps
make a small donation towards a median project that the city would undertake.
Statton moved to deny the appeal and grant the application for the original design. James
seconded and the motion carried 4-1 with Dean voting no.
Bumett moved to approve the Planning Commission recommendations for the
application, with the following amendments:
· construction may not begin before 8:00 a.m.
· Symantec Corp. will amend its 'letter about the Learning Center's availability by
deleting reference to events "sponsored by the Cupertino city manager"
· the approval of the application is conditional upon subsequent approval by the city
council of median improvements on Torte Avenue.
· recommendations on the median improvements will come back to council in two
weeks
18. Public hearing to consider Application 7-Z-99, City of Cupertino, which requests Pre-
zoning of a portion of thc Stelling Road right-of-way, from north of Greenleaf Drive to
Hazelbrook Drive (Garden Gate), to Pre-RI-10 Zone for latex annexation. The Planning
Commission recommends granting a Negative Declaration and denying the request for
prezoning. Staff recommends removing the item from the agenda because the project
does not comply with Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) requirements.
Cowan explained that this annexation application was initiated by the Planning
Commission with the intent of taking advantage ofthe new state law AB 1555 which
gives cities the power to involuntarily annex county pockets of less than 75 acres. The
city has been working with the county for the last few years to aggressively pursue
annexation of county pockets, and the city was proposing to annex part of a strip of
Stelling Road that would create two pockets in the Garden Gate neighborhood. The
planning commission was concerned about the use of that tool because they felt
neighborhoods should have been notified not only of the annexation but also the broader
issues related to subsequent annexation. Therefore the commission recommended denial
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 9
of the pre-zoning application. In the mcantimc, the county counsel has determined that
the proposed pre-zoning was not appropriate under the law so staff recommended the
item be pulled from the agenda. Garden Gate residents interested in the annexation topic
are present tonight to address that issue. Cowan explained that there is a county
ordinance that specifies if a person tears down their house to 50% of its value, they must
be annexed to the nearest city if that city will accept the property. Cupertino's position
has been to accept the annexation if the property involved is contiguous to land owned by
the city. For mass annexations a different process.is followed which includes a protest
vote.
Ms. Marian Crowel, 10494 N. Stelling Rd., said she spoke to the Planning Commission
last week opposing annexation. She distributed an informal petition to property owners
close to Stelling Road. She discussed the requests made for a crossing guard at Garden
Gate Elementary School, and said that several years ago thc principal of garden gate
school started a safety patrol club to help the children across the street because of the
dangerous situation. She understood why many people feel a need for a crossing guard,
but the stop light has done a great deal of good to help the problem. She said she
opposed the annexation, and asked that council consider holding public meetings so the
residents can hear all sides of the issue. She also extended her thanks to the Planning
Commission for the way they handled the manner.
Ms. Margaret Limberatos, 20724 Garden Gate Dr., said she was strongly in favor of
annexation of Garden Gate Village to Cupertino because it would allow us the right to
elect those responsible for governing the area, and a local government would be more
responsive to their needs. Other benefits would be improved strut maintenance, street'
sweeping, more restrictive building codes resulting in more attractive homes and less
privacy intrusion, a crossing guard, and traffic enforcement by the County Sheriff's
Officers.
Ms. Melissa Hilton, 20861 Fargo Dr., said she is the school site chair for Garden Gate
Elementary School. She discussed the complications involved in trying to obtain a
crossing guard through the county, and two years later they have been told that funding
has not been identified and the school must find the employee. She said they are strongly
in favor of annexation. She also appreciates what thc county has done to more closely
match thc city guidelines.
Mr. Les Bowers, 2118 Hazelbrook Dr., said hc was in favor of annexation as soon as
possible because he sees that much of the development taking place is by developers
building spec houses who have no interest in living in thc neighborhood.
The City Attorney explained that there has been a modification in the law regarding the
separate elections held in the Rancho Rinconada area. The Attorney Ocn~ has given
the opinion that in a regular annexation no such tax election is necessary because it's all
included in one, so if the Council elects to pwceed with annexation on a volunteer basis
in Garden Gate, there will not be the same requirements as in Rancho Rinconada.
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 10
Mr. Lee Crothers, 20777 Fargo Dr., said he was opposed to annexation, and had moved to
this location so that he would not be in a city. He resented the fact that the city tried to
split the neighborhood into two pockets with no notice to the residents. Twice in the
recent past the property owners have voted down an opportunity to annex.
Chang said he is seeing strong feelings on both sides of the issue, and would want to get
as much public input as possible. Regardless of what the state has done to make it easier
for Cupertino to annex property, council should still let the residents determine the
outcome.
James apologized on the part of the city for any misunderstandings created by the lack of
notice. She agreed with Chang's comments about the city's philosophy of annexation.
Burnett said that the people should have an opportunity to vote on the question. If it
doesn't pass, then those people who want to be annexed can do so on an individual basis.
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
19. Road Bumps:
(a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1837, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.34 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
Relating to Roadway Design Features, Section 11.34.010 Relating to Road Bump-
Definition."
(b) First reading of Ordinance No. 1838, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.34 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
Relating to Roadway Design Features, Section 11.34.020 Relating to
Administrative Authority."
(c) First reading of Ordinance No. 1839, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.34 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
Relating to Roadway Design Features, Section 11.34.030 Relating to
Establishment of Warrants for the Installation and Maintenance of Road Bumps."
The City Clerk read the title of ordinance Nos. 1837-1839. Bumett moved and Chang
seconded to read the ordinances by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would
constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0.
20. First reading of Ordinance No. 1840, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino Amending Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 11.24.150 Relating To Parking
Prohibition, Chapter 11.24.160 Relating To Parking Prohibition During C~'~ain Hours on
the East and West Sides Of Mary Avenue, and Chapter 11.24.180 Relating To Diagonal
Parking on the West Side Of Mary Avenue."
November 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 11
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumett moved and James seconded to read
the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the 'first
reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0.
21. First reading of Ordinance No. 1841, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino Amending Section 11.20.020 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to
Establishment of Vehicular Stop and Section 11.20.030, All Directional Vehicular Stop
Required at Certain Intersections to Include Bahl Street at the Intersection of Ainsworth
Drive, Kendle Street at the'Intersection of Ainsworth Drive, and Carta Blanea Street at
the Intersection of Ainsworth Drive."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumett moved and Chang seconded to read
the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first
reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0.
22. Consideration of canceling the December 20, 1999, City Council meeting.
James moved and Chang seconded to cancel the meeting. The motion carried 5-0.
ORDINANCES
STAFF REPORTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
Chang reported that Leadership Cupertino programs were going well. There are 29 members in
the adult program, which is in its third year, and the youth program started this year. Chang said
he had been participating in community forums with other candidates and they provided a
valuable opportunity to hear what is on the residents' minds.
James said she sits in on both the Leadership Cupertino and the Teen Leadership programs, and
asked that the video crew take part in next years' program because it is important that the
commtmity hears what is said. James also attended the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Groups'
public policy lunch with fellow council members. The State Treasurer spoke at that meeting and
indicated that there is money available, but nothing has yet been done about Internet taxation.
CLOSED SESSION - None
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:10 p.m. the meeting was adjourned.
Kimberly Smith, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 99-329
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
OCTOBER 29, 1999
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated
representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the
availability of funds for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows
the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set
forth in Exhibit "A".
CERTIFIED:
Director of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15thday of November ,1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
10/28/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE I
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572924" and "572976"
FUND - 110 - GENEP~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 572924 10/25/99 1579 CUPERTINO LOC-N-STOR LLC 1106500 DEPOSIT & i MON RENTAL 0,00 272.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 WATER SERVICE 0.00 30.42
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CO~4PANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 855.15
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 WATER SERVICE 0.00 219.14
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 WATER SERVICE 0,00 1772.95
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 WATER SERVICE 0,00 317.70
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1244.53
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1421.63
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1161,70
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 WATER SERVICE 0.00 30.42
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1748.67
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 WATER SERVICE 0.00 50.92
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 21.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 22.43
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 WATER SERVICE 0.00 63.85
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 6.20
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 305.77
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 13.76
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER C(~PANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 10.90
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 46.45
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 'q.49
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 WATER SERVICE 0.00 .15
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CC~4PANY 1108506 WATER SERVICE 0.00 ~6.66
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 10.90
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 56.69
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COf4PANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 116.79
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COt4PANY 5606620 WATER SERVICE 0.00 165.22
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER 'C(~4PANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 22.43
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 WATER SERVICE 0.00 229.62
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108303 WATER SERVICE 0.00 295,44
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 WATER SERVICE 0.00 899.32
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108303 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1573.33
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COI4PANY 1108503 WATER SERVICE 0.00 73.64
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER C(~4PANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 35.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 67.91
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CO~PAI~Y 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 185.26
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CO~IPAI~Y 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 213.88
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATF~H CGE~P~NY 1108507 WATER SERVICE 0.O0 52.17
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 ~ JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 205.64
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSS WATER COt4P~TY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 128.02
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108302 WATER SERVICE 0.00 385.60
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108321 WATER SERVICE 0.00 30.42
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 S~N JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 72.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 16.03
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 9.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 5708510 WATER SERVICE 0.00 9.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 525 SAN JOSg WATER COHPANY 5708510 WATER SERVICE 0.00 9.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 746.21
1020 5?2928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108303 WATER SERVICE 0.00 53
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPANY 1108322 WATER SERVI~E 0.00 .59
RUN DATE 10/28/99 TII~ 14:55:30 - FINANCIA~- ACCOUNTING
10/28/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE :
ACCOTJNTING PERIOD: 4/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBTJ~SEMENT FUND
ECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no beuween "572924" and "572976"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 115.45
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 79.67
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 26.64
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 23.78
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER C~P/~ 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 30.93
1020 572928 10/28/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 26.23
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 10.49
1020 572928 10/25/99 62~ SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 30.93
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 383.04
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 215.62
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 WATER SERVICE 0.00 607.40
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 153.62
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 WATER SERVICE 0.00 361.27
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~ 1108323 WATER SERVICE 0.00 25.00
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 WATER SERVICE 0.00 149.48
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 WATER SERVICE 0.00 72.21
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 WATER SERVICE 0.00 103.69
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAIqY 1108303 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1344.37
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108322 WATER SERVICE 0.00 10.90
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 WATER SERVICE 0.00 10.49
1020 $72928 10/25/99 625 ~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640 WATER SERVICE 0.00 130.00
.-2-Q20 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 WATER SERVICE 0.00 9.00
0 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~TY 5606620 WATER SERVICE 0.00 358.41
.~20 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 WATER SERVICE 0.00 221.03
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 WATER SERVICE 0.00 727.50
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1283.58
1020 572928 10/25/99 625 SA~ JOSE WATER C(]4PAHY 1108312 WATER SERVICE 0.00 2044.47
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 24066.83
1020 572929 10/26/99 62~ SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/qY 1108314 WATER SVC SHORT PAID 0.00 1890.00
1020 572930 10/29/99 1160 DAVID BRADY 1103300 RETIREMENT GIFTS 0.00 205.24
1020 572931 10/29/99 M CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS* AS 1101200 SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 96.00
1020 572932 10/29/99 1460 TONI CARREIRO 6109855 WEBSXTE UPDATES 10/99 0.00 2915.00
1020 572933 10/29/99 144 CASH 1106647 PETTY CASH REII~JVJRSEME 0.00 35.00
1020 572933 10/29/99 144 CASH 5806649 PETTY CASH REXMBURSEME 0.00 84.90
1020 572933 10/29/99 144 CASH 5606640 PETTY CASH REXMBURSEME 0.00 86.62
1020 572933 10/29/99 144 CASH 5606620 PETTY.CASH REII~URSEME 0.00 30.11
1020 572933 10/29/99 144 CASH 5606680 PETTY CASH REIr~fl~URSEME 0.00 6.76
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 243.39
1020 572934 10/29/99 146 CASH 5806249 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 87.23
1020 572934 10/29/99 146 CASH 5806349 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 5.00
1020 572934 10/29/99 146 CASH 5806449 PETTY CASH REXMEURSEME 0.00 8.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 100.23
~0 572935 10/29/99 M CELSOC 1108601 REGXSTRATXON/R CHOND 0.00 250.0C
1020 572936 10/29/99 1580 CLARI(EeS MACRXH~ SHOP 6308540 PARTS 0.00 74.0C
10/28/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ]
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISEURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between #572924" and "572976"
FUND - 110 - GENEPJ~L FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FL~ND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AROUN~
1020 572937 10/29/99 1407 CU~t~INGS HENDERSON TIRE 6308540 PARTS 0.18 3.4.
1020 572938 10/29/99 191 CUPERTINO C~ER OF COM 1104000 C ATWOOD 0.00 60.00
1020 572939 10/29/99 191 CUPERTINO CT~ER OF COM 1101200 D BROWN 0.00 60.00
1020 572940 10/29/99 191 CUPERTINO C~ER OF C~ 1101000 M CHA/~G 0.00 60.00
1020 572941 10/29/99 1050 CUPERTINO COllie"/ SERV 1103300 ~ SVC FUNDING 10/1 0.00 50000.00
1020 572942 10/29/99 1586 CUPERTINO SENIOR DAY SER 1103300 ~ SVC FUNDING 10/1 0.00 12000.00
1020 572943 10/29/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108312 SUPPLIES 0.00 442.35
1020 572943 10/29/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108407 SUPPLIES 8.78 115.15
TOT~J~ CHECK 8.70 557.50
1020 572944 10/29/99 198 CUPERTINO UNION SCHL DIS 2308004 ~7~AIqSPORTATION 0.00 132.10
1020 572944 10/29/99 198 CUPERTINO UNION SCHL DIS 2308004 ~SPORTATION 0.00 138.28
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 270.38
1020 S72945 10/29/99 211 DELTA D~TT~Ja P~J~N OF CA 110 REPLACE CK 053908 0.00 .95
1020 572946 10/29/99 242 EMPLOY]~ DEVEL DEPT 110 STA~7~ HI~O~DING 0.00 15251.43
1020 572947 10/29/99 243 EMPLOY[~ DEVELOPMENT 110 STATE DISABILITY INSUR 0.00 54.93
1020 572948 10/29/99 1333 SSCOt4 SOF~;~RE S~RVICHS 6109854 CRYSTAL REPORTS 0.00 200.00
1020 572949 10/29/99 1581 'FORD WHOLESALE CO INC 1100312 SUPPLIES 0.00 82.65
1020 572949 10/29/99 1581 FORD WHOLESALE CO INC 1108312 SUPPLIES 0.00 393.60
1020 572949 10/29/99 1581 FORD WHOLESALE CO INC 1100312 SUPPLIES 0.00 194.85
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 671.10
1020 572950 10/29/99 313 H & H ATHLETIC T~ SUPP 1108312 SOCCER GOALS 105.66 1600.66
1020 572950 10/29/99 313 H & H ATHLETIC 1~ S~'PP 1108312 SOCCER GOA~ 17.68 267.60
TOTAL CHECK 123.34 1868.34
1020 572951 10/29/99 1584 i~IS PUBLICATIONS 5208003 DISPLAY AD 0.00 150.00
1020 572952 10/29/99 341 ICE C~ 5806349 ADMISSIONS 0.00 193.75
1020 572953 10/29/99 343 ICMA RSTIRBI~NT THUST-45 110 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 0.00 6963.25
1020 572954 10/29/99 392 T~ OF CALXFOi~NIA CIT 1101000 REGISTRATION/W DE~I 0.00 295.00
1020 572955 10/29/99 1587 LON~ TERM CARE 09~UDSMAN 1103300 HUMAN SVC FUNDIN(~ 10/1 0.00 4555.00
1020 572956 10/29/99 439 MICHAELS #13333 5806649 SUPPLIES 0.00 ,67
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107501 SUPPLIES 0.00 69.96
RUN DATE 10/28/99 TIME 14:SE:32 - FINANCXALACCOLINTXNG
10/28/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 4
~A.TCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
_.~ECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572924' and N572976"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104100 SUPPLIES 0.00 42.52
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104400 SUPPLIES O.00 18.36
1020 S72958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108601 SUPPLIES 0.00 13.00
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108601 SUPPLIES 0.00 16.62
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 16.62
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104000 SUPPLIES 0.00 46.73
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 2204011 SUPPLIES 0.00 35.93
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104400 SUPPLIES 0.00 147.76
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108001 SUPPLIES 0.00 41.38
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 16.30
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 13.01
1020 S72958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104400 CREDIT 9/29/99 0.00 -82.35
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 64.99
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104000 SUPPLIES 0.00 18.04
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104100 CREDIT 9/22/99 0.00 -36.69
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 313.95
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104000 SUPPLIES 0.00 69.26
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 154.36
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 SUPPLIES 0.00 256.30
1020 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108201 SUPPLIES 0.00 85.43
.J~20 572958 10/29/99 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 52.34
~L CHECK 0.00 1373.82
1020 572959 10/29/99 M OKAZAKI. JOANNE 6109850 REI~URSEMENT 0.00 75.22
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARD,ARE 4209110 SUPPLIES 0.00 221.31
1020 S72960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108530 SUPPLIES 0.00 193.70
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108312 SUPPLIES 0.00 70.90.
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108530 CREDIT 9/14/99 0.00 -94.17
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPI~Y HARD,ARE 1108503 SUPPLIES 0.00 10.21
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDMARE 1108312 SUPPLIES 0.00 198.0%
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108530 SUPPLIES 0.00 13.38
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108506 SUPPLIES 0.00 19.47
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPIF~Y HARDWARE 1108506 SUPPLIES 0.00 45.04
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLYHARDMARE 1108505 SUPPLIES 0.00 42.88
1020 572960 10/29/99 1220 ORCHARD SUPPhY HARI~ARE 5708510 SUPPLIES 0.00 18.56
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 739.35
1020 . 572961 10/29/99 1588 OUTREACH AND ESCORT INC 1103300 HUMAN SVC FUNDING 10/1 0.00 10000.00
1020 572962 10/29/99 833 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 305.65
1020 572962 10/29/99 833 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 579.37
1020 572962 10/29/99 833 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 67.68
1020 572962 10/29/99 833 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 21419.91
1020 572962 10/29/99 833 P E R S 110 RETXREMENT 0.00 107.07
1020 572962 10/29/99 833 P B R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 2903.05
TOTAL CHRCK 0.00 25382.73
''"~0 572963 10/29/99 533 PERS LONG TERMCARB PROO 110 LONG TERMCARE 0.00 521.53
1020 572964 10/29/99 M SANTA CLARA ~ ASSES 1107305 SERVICES 10/21/99 0.00 30.81
/'
RUN DATE 10/28/99 TIME 14:55:32 - FINANCIAL ~UNTXN~
10/28/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "5?2924" and #572978H
.FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 572965' 10/29/99 M SANTA CLARA COUNTY BAR A 1101500 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 0.00 193.0~.
1020 572966 10/29/99 1582 SCVWD-URBAN RUNOFF 2308004 ASSESSMENT 0.00 50717.00
1020 572967 10/29/99 1589 SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK 1103300 HU~ SVC FUNDING 10/1 0.00 5000.00
1020 572968 10/29/99 M SILICON VALLEY MANUFACTU 1107405 REGISTRATION/V GIL 0.00 125.00
1020 572969 10/29/99 677 STATE STREET BANK & TRUS 110 DEFERRED C(tMPENSATION 0.00 538.68
1020 572970 10/29/99 1590 SUPPORT NETWORK FOR BATT 1103300 HUMAN SVC FUNDING 10/1 0.00 5500.00
1020 572971 10/29/99 701 TARGET STORES 5806449 SUPPLIES 0.00 54.10
1020 572972 10/29/99 1013 TAX COLLECTOR 1104000 1ST INSTALLMENT 0.00 2215.30
1020 572973 10/29/99 M TULLY, ]CATHLEEN 1101031 PUBLIC ACCESS GP~ 0.00 500.00
1020 572974 10/29/99 M U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYOR 1101000 REGISTRATION/W DEAN 0.00 175.00
1020 5?2975 10/29/99 302 WASHINGTON MUTUAL 110 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 0.00 I 44
1020 572976 10/29/99 962 LINDA YELAVICH S506549 REIMBUR$~ 0.00 36.56
1020 572976 10/29/99 962 LINDA YELAVICH 5506549 REIZ~URSEMENT 0.00 41.34
1020 572976 10/29/99 962 LINDAYELAVICH 5506549 RRIM~URSIDdENT 0.00 3.88
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 81.78
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 132.30 254505.18
TOTAL FUND 132.30 254505.18
TOTAL REPORT 132.30 254505.18
RUN DATE 10/28/99 TIME 14:55:33 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10/2~/99 CIT~ OF CUPERTINO ~AG~ :
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
ECTION CRITERIA: transact.t_c~"20" and transact.trans_date between #10/25/1999" and "10/29/1999"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUN=
1020 572710 V 10/22/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108407 SUPPLIES -0.18 -3.42
1020 572710 V 10/22/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108407 SUPPLIES -8.78 -115.15
1020 572710 V 10/22/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108312 PART & SUPPLIES 0.00 -442.35
TOTAL CHECK -8.96 -560.92
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT -8.96 -560.92
TOTAL FUND -8.96 -560.92
TOTAL REPORT -8,96 -560.92
RUN DATE 10128199 TIME 14:56:21 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
RESOLUTION NO. 99-333
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR FUEL TANK REPLACEMENTS,
PROJECT NUMBER 98-117
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino, California, that Change Order
No. 1 for changes to work which has been approved by the Director of Public Worka and this day
presented to this Council, be, and it hereby approved in conjunction with the project known as
FUEL TANK REPLACEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER 98-117
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that funds are available and no further appropriation is
necessary.
'- PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15'~ day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED: '
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408)777-3354
Cupertino
FUEL TANK REPLACEMENTS
PROJECT NUMBER
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Contractor
Tank Protect Engineering of Northern California, Inc.
2821 Whipple Road
Union City, CA 94587-1233
The following changes are hereby approved:
lA. Construct handicap access ramp $ 1,500.00
lB. Dispose of contaminated soil 9,034.12
lC Excavate and stockpile contnmlnated soil 3.192.98
Total Change Order No. 1 $ 13,727.10
Total Project:
Original Contract $ 265,555.00
Change Order No. 1 13.727.10
Revised Contract $ 279,282.10
CONTRACTOR CITY OF CUPERTINO
Date ID:alutlon No.q~- ~ ~ ~
Printe~ on Recycled Paper
RESOLUTION NO. 99-330
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCKIBED FOR GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
NOVEI~BER 5, 19 9 9
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated
representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the
availability of funds for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows
the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set
forth in Exhibit "A'.
CEKTIFIED:
Director of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15thday of November ,1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
11/05/99 CITY OF C~3PERTINO PAGE
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT ~UND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1106100 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 12.54
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1108001 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 20.00
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1108601 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 24.36
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1101201 PETTY CASH REIMEURSEME 0.00 21.19
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1104001 PETTY CASH REIMEURSEME 0.00 15.00
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1104510 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 15.00
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1104400 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 114.42
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1104100 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 54.75
1020 5729?? 11/03/99 149 CASR 1107501 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 52.73
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1104001 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 19.00
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1108101 PETTY CASH RE/MBURSEME 0.00 14.00
1020 57297? 11/03/99 149 CASH 1101000 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 90.05
1020 572977 11/03/99 149 CASH 1101070 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 22.92
TOTAl., CHECK 0.00 475.96
1020 572978 11/05/99 7 ABAG PLAN CORPORATION 1104540 LIABILITY CLAIMS/AVELA 0.00 1601.65
1020 572979 11/05/99 858 AC! REAL PROPERTIES INC 1100000 SALES TAX INCENTIVE AG 0.00 141673.71
1020 572980 11/05/99 20 ADVANTAGE GRAFIX 1107301 SUPPLIES 0.00 79.56
1020 572980 11/05/99 20 ADVANTAGE GRAFIX 1108201 SUPPLIES 0.00. 271.43
1020 572980 11/05/99 20 ADVANTAGE GRAFIX 1107301 SUPPLIES 0.00
1020 572980 11/05/99 20 ADVANTAGE GRAFIX 1104310 SUPPLIES 0.00 3
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 55b.59
1020 572981 11/05/99 25 AIR COOI~"D EIqGINES INC 6308540 PARTS 10.63 139.47
1020 572982 11/05/99 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL ~NC 1108501 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 685.]3
1020 572982 11/05/99 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL INC 1108507 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 50.00
1020 572982 11/05/99 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL INC 1108501 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 117.43
1020 572982 11/05/99 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL INC 1108504 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 200.00
1020 572982 11/05/99 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL INC 1108505 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 50.00
1020 572982 11/05/99 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL INC 1108501 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 241.59
1020 572952 11/05/99 26 AIR ;ILTSR COHTROL INC 1108502 PARTS & SUPPLISS 0.00 200.00
TOTAl, CHECK 0.00 1544.]5
1020 572983 11/05/99 918 ~ HORLD TRAI/RLAND T 5506549 DEPOSIT/COLK,,1,ENIA OUEEN 0.00 6300.00
1020 572984 11/05/99 1591 ~I,~BRIC..~,N S'I'~EL AND STAIR 5?08510 REPLACH STAIR STEP 0.00 250.00
1020 572985 11/05/99 49 ~NACONDA SPORTS INC 5806449 SUPPLIES 0.00 107.84
1020 5?2986 11/05/99 M AOKZ, ~DWARD 1100000 REFUND/SQ FT DIFFSRBNC 0.00 150.00
1020 57298? 11/05/99 57 AR~M,iRRK 1104510 EMPLOYEE COFFEE 0.00 2]5.36
1020 572988 11/05/99 59 ARI{~ SIG~CO 2?08405 LGGUEST PARKING HANGR 163.19 2141,19
1020 S72989 11/05/99 M AR¥~d, iRIt', F,~R3d, iAR~ 5800000 RECR. E~TION REFUND 0.00 44.00
1020 572990 11/05/99 6? AUTOMATIC RAIN COMP~I'{I{' 1108314 SUPPLIES 61.07 0, ·
RUN DATE 11/05/~ TII~ 08:42:54 - FINANCIAL ACCO~,~IT~NG
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
~CTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 572990 11/05/99 67 AUTOMATIC RAIN COMPANY 1108407 SUPPLIES 11.08 145.07
1020 572990 11/05/99 67 AUTOMATIC RAIN COMPANY 1108303 SUPPLIES 22.12 290.24
TOTAL CHECK 94.27 1236.90
1020 572991 11/05/99 1519 AUTREY SUPPLY CO INC 1108315 GOAL LINE PAINT 0.00 822,15
1020 572991 11/05/99 1519 AUTREY SUPPLY CO INC 1108312 GOAL LINE PAINT 0.00 822.15
1020 572991 11/05/99 1519 AUTREY SUPPLY CO INC 1108314 GOAL LINE PAINT 0.00 822.15
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2466.45
1020 572992 11/05/99 M AHA 1108001 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 0.00 225.00
1020 572993 11/05/99 993 JACKLYN BADDELEY 5508549 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 90.00
1020 572994 11/05/99 M BAK, ERIC 5706450 REISSUE P/R CK 7/23/99 0.00 278.48
1020 572995 11/05/99 1557 DAVID BARNES 5806249 CATERING SERVICES 0.00 189.00
1020 572996 11/05/99 80 BARRY & VOLKMANN 5709209 ADA UPGRADE AUG-SEP 99 0.00 2204.50
1020 572997 11/05/99 M BATCHLER, LEUNARD 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R5024 0.00 100.00
10_~20 572998 11/05/99 720 BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308540 PARTS 67.45 885.00
J 572999 11/05/99 1057 BENEFXTAMERICA 110 REPLENISH FSA ACCT 0.00 1180.52
1020 573000 11/05/99 90 BEN~FITAM~RICA 110 ADf~q FEES 10/99 0.00 20.50
1020 573001 11/05/99 1592 BIDDLE ROOFING SUPPLY IN 1108312 BUFF FIRESTONE BASE 0.00 675.48
1020 573002 11/05/99 M BIIJ~IG, MICHaeL 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R98155 0.00 150.04
1020 573003 11/05/99 96 B~ACK MT SPRING #AT~R 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 95.80
1020 573004 11/05/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO CO~4L~ICATI 1108501 REPAIR RADIO 0.00 403.82
1020 573004 11/05/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO COI4~ZCATI 1108501 RADIO REPAIR 0,00 128.85
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 532.67
1020 573005 11/05/99 872 BSA ARCHI?ECTS 4249210 SR CFR EXPANSION 0.00 2538.88
1020 573005 11/05/99 872 BSA ARCHITECTS 4249210 SR CTR EXPANSION 0.00 290.40
1020 573005 11/05/99 872 BSA ARCHITECTS "*--_ 4249210 SR CTR EXPANSION 0.00 4479.30
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 7306.58
1020 573006 11/05/99 19 ROBERT C BURKE 2617402 RECORDING IOAR DOC~4EN 0.00 S0.00
1020 573007 11/05/99 1593 BUTTES PIPE & SUPPLY CO 5606640 SUPPLIES 0.00 124.92
1020 573008 11/05/99 874 C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC 5506549 SUPPLIES 0.00 188.05
1020 573009 11/05/99 120 C. B. TOOL CO 1108505 SUPPLIES 0.00 273.22
~ 573010 11/05/99 121 C.E.O. SERVICES ZNC 2204011 DIR/YOUTH LEADERSHIP 0.00 750.00
RT~IDAT~ 11/05/99 TZMB 08:42:54 - FINANCZAL ACCOUHTING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573011 11/05/99 122 JUAN CABRAL 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 892.80
1020 573012 11/05/99 124 CALIF S~FETY & SUPPLY 1108408 SUPPLIES 0.00 86.71
1020 573013 11'/05/99 1594 CALIFOHNIA SECURITY 5606640 SERVICE 0.00 145.00
1020 573014 11/05/99 813 CAMP DRESSER & MCK~E INC 4209801 PROP SVC 3/7-4/10/99 0.00 4656.00
1020 573015 11/05/99 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 SERVICES 0.00 237.90
1020 573016 11/05/99 146 CASH 5806649 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 141.17
1020 573016 11/05/99 146 CASH 5806249 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 36.79
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 177.96
1020 573017 11/05/99 1431 CAYOT, LINDA 5806249 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 138.94
1020 573018 11/05/99 M CHASE, MARLENE A 5506549 REII~3URSEMENT · 0.00 56.57
1020 573019 11/05/99 M CHEN, CHI-CHFI~G 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 43.75
1020 573020 11/05/99 M CHEN, MING 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 50
1020 573021 11/05/99 M CHOI, SEO-HWANG 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 100.00
1020 573022 11/05/99 911 RAYMOND CHONG 1108601 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 428.27
1020 573023 11/05/99 M CHOU, AILIN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 48.00
1020 573024 11/05/99 1453 C~IRISTOPH~RS CARPET S~RV 1108504 CARPET SEAM REPAIRS 0.00 550.00
1020 573024 11/05/99 1453 CHRISTOPHERS CARPET SERV 1108504 REPAIRS 0.00 360.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 910.00
1020 573025 11/05/99 M CHU, SALLY 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 17.00
1020 573026 11/05/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1108314 SUPPLIES 0.00 54.13
1020 573027 11/05/99 166 KIMBBRLY CLARK 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 240.00
1020 573028 11/05/99 1595 CLONNSAROUND CLUB 5806649 PERFORMERS 0.00 225.00
1020 573029 11/05/99 178 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110 INS PREMI~4 11/1-12/1 0.00 66.75
1020 573030 11/05/99 1423 CONCR~I~ GRINDING COI~PAN 2708403 SIDEWALK .GRINDZNG/I~4T 0.00 11708.93
1020 573031 11/05/99 1565 CONCRET~ PROJECTMGt4T CO 5609105 HANDICAP P.~MP 0.00 3201.00
1020 573032 11/05/99 1293 COSMOJU~4P 5606620 RENTA~ 0.00 140.00
1020 573033 11/05/99 183 ~ SHIP, SS & ASSO IN 110 PROFESSZON~J, SERVICES 0.00 I 0
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08:42:55 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTZNG
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 4
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENEP~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573034 11/05/99 1130 THE COURT WORKS 1108314 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 2824.47
1020 573034 11/05/99 1130 THE COURT WORKS 1108314 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 161.95
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2986.42
1020 573035 11/05/99 1194 COURTESY TOW 6308540 TOWING SERVICE 10/26 0.00 135.00
1020 573035 11/05/99 1194 COURTESY TOW 6308540 TOWING SERVICE 9/9/99 0.00 175.00
1020 573035 11/05/99 1194 COURTESY TOW 6308540 TOWING SERVICES 10/28 0.00 262.50
1020 573035 11/05/99 1194 COURTESY TOW 6308540 TOWING SERVICES 10/29 0.00 175.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 747.50
1020 573036 11/05/99 184 J/M4ES COURTNEY 5806649 PERFORmeR 0.00 200.00
1020 573037 11/05/99 841 ROBERT COWAN 1107200 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 190.00
1020 573038 11/05/99 984 CROSSROADS CHEVRON SERVI 6308540 FUEL/CITY VEHICLES 0.00 1760.71
1020 573039 11/05/99 1407 C~INGS HENDERSON TIRE 6308540 PARTS 34.96 716.48
1020 573039 11/05/99 1407 CT~INGS HENDERSON TIRE 6308540 PARTS 0.74 93.24
TOTAL CHECK 35.70 809.72
1020 573040 11/05/99 191 CUPERTINO CHEER OF COM 1101000 SANDRA JAMES 0.00 60.00
~ 573040 11/05/99 191 CUPERTINO CHEER OF CO~ 1101000 DON BURI~ 0.00 60[00
. CHECK 0.00 120.00
1020 573041 11/05/99 191 CUPERTINO CI~ OF COl4 2204011 MEETING 10/19/99 0.00 61.70
1020 573042 11/05/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108312 SUPPLIES 3.28 43.08
1020 573042 11/05/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108315 SUPPLIES 7.73 101.39
1020 573042 11/05/99 194 CUPERTIND SUPPLY INC 1108407 SUPPLIES 34.31 450.18
1020 573042 11/05/99 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC .1108501 SUPPLIES 0.00 191.33
TOTAL CHECK 45.32 785.98
1020 573043 11/05/99 M DABESTANX, REZA 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R1504 0.00 100.00
1020 573044 11/05/99 201 DAPPER TIRE CO 6308540 PARTS 6.54 138.60
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANnA SERVICES INC 1108501 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 409.49
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108511 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 639.87
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVIUES INC 1108507 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 1256.61
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE AN?.A SERVICES INC 1108502 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 3582.21
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICff~ INC 5708510 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 2092.84
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606620 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 383.40
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108501 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 2041.71
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108505 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 1075.29
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108503 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 1708.86
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANnA SERVICES ZNC 1108509 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 526.73
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108506 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 238,84
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES XNC 1108509 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 551.44
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES XNC .1108504 JANXTORXAL SVC 10/99 0.00 5160,60
~?"'- 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES ZNC 5606640 JANITORIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 383.40
573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES ZNC 1108314 SPECIAl, SVC 10/99 0.00 5709.96
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08~42:55 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER o DISBURSE~4ENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between #572977" and "573209#
FUND - 110 - GENEP~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. ~JND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573045 11/05/99 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108407 SPECIAL SVC 10/99 0.00 900.3~
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 26661.C~
1020 573046 11/05/99 1313 DELTA SAFETY SUPPLY CO 1108530 SUPPLIES 0.00 91.87
1020 573046 11/05/99 1313 DELTA SAFETY SUPPLY CO 1108530 SUPPLIES 0.00 28.14
TOTAL CNECK 0.00 120.01
1020 573047 11/05/99 1335 DENISE GOSS 5806249 RECREATION PROGRAm4 0.00 45.30
1020 573048 11/05/99 1596 DESIGN IN WOOD }~t~LNITURE 1106647 BOOKCASE 0.00 139.64
1020 573049 11/05/99 M DORMAN, SUSAN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 ' 43.00
1020 573050 11/05/99 M DRINKWATER, BARB~ 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 42.00
1020 573051 11/05/99 M DTSC 4209801 MANIFEST FEE 1998 0.00 245.00
1020 573052 11/05/99 1397 BYRON J DUHON 5806449 RECREATION PROG~ 0.00 332.00
1020 573053 11/05/99 855 DULZN ADVERTISING /NC 1104510 SJl~q - CASE MANAGER 0.00 749.25
1020 573054 11/05/99 M DUI~IWAY, LYNN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 '.00
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ENGINEERING DATA SER 110 WHALENaCO(SPRZNT PCS) 0.00 64.72
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ~NGINEERING DATA SER 110 HL~qTSMAN(STARBUCKS) 0.00 56.14
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ENGINEERING DATA SER 110 SANTA C~ARA FAM DENTAL 0.00 63.40
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ENGINEERING DATA SER 110 SY-PIN PANG 0.00 57.46
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 ~DS ENGINEERING DATA SER 1104300 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICSS 0.00 63.07
1020 S73055 11/05/99 234 ~DS ENGINEERING DATA SER 110 ST~VE S/Id~AY 0.00 67.69
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ~NGINEERZNGDATA SER 1101070 HOSSAIN K~IRI 0.00 61.42
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ~NGINEERING DATA SEA 1101070 APPLE COMPUTER 0.00 52.51
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 ~DS ENGINEEAING DATA SER 110 HUNTSMRN(STARBUCKS) 0.00 60.10
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 ~DS EAGIN~ERING DATA SER 110 STEVE SARAY 0.00 94.09
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ENGINEERING DATA SER 110 THE RIDING GROUP 0.00 88.91
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 EDS ENGINEERING DATA SER 110 P~TER&CARMEL BLAKE-BUR 0.00 62.94
1020 573055 11/05/99 234 ~D$ ~N~INEERINGDATA SEA 1101070 MAILZNG NOTICES 0.~0 490.35
~TAL CHECK 0.00 1252.60
1020 573056 11/05/99 239 ]~LBCTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1108503 SUPPLIES 0.00 260.52
1020 573057 11/05/99 251 EVANS ~EST V~aL~Y SPRAY 1108315 TURF SPRAYING 0.00 4200.00
1020 573058 11/05/99 253 EXCHANGE LXN~NSEAVXCE 6806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 42.00
1020 573058 11/05/99 253 ~XCHANGE LINEN SBRVICR 6806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 91.06
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 133.06
1020 573059 11/05/99 1255 PIRSTAUTONOTIVE DISTRIB 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 49.90
1020 573060 11/05/99 .266 RYAN FORBES 6806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 995.60
1020 573061 11/05/99 273 FR~HONT UNION H.So DIST. 6806449 FACILITY USAGE 7/1-8/1 0.00 b .00
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08:42:56 - FIN/d~CIALACCOUNTING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 6
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
~CTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between #572977" and '573209"
FUND - 110 - GENER~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573061 11/05/99 273 FREMONT UNION H.S. DIST. 5806449 FACILITY RENTAL7/19-23 0.00 542.50
1020 573061 11/05/99 273 FREMONT UNION H.S. DIST. 5806449 FACILITY USAGE 7/1-8/1 0.00 8370.00
1020 573061 11/05/99 273 FREMONT UNION H.S. DIST. 5806449 FACILITY RENTAL 0.00 39.38
1020 573061 11/05/99 273 FREMONT UNION H.S. DIST. 5806449. FACILITY RENTAL 0.00 2742.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 20063.88
1020 573062 11/05/99 274 FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108406 SUPPLIES 0.00 296.61
1020 573063 11/05/99 277 JOHN FUNG 5806249 RECREATION PROGP~ 0.00 72.60
1020 573064 11/05/99 1268 C4~LLI PRODUCE 5806249 SUPPLIES 10/27/99 0.00 59.75
1020 573064 11/05/99 1268 GALLI PRODUCE 5806249 SUPPLIES 10/21/99 0.00 42.30
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 102.05
1020 573065 11/05/99 M GANAPATHY. SUlqAN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 42.00
1020 573066 11/05/99 281 GARDENLAND 6308540 PARTS 18.73 245.79
1020 573066 11/05/99 201 OARDENLAND 6309820 EQUII~NT 219.44 2879.~6
1020 573066 11/05/99 281 OARDEIqI~ 6308540 PARTS 4.09 53.72
1020 573066 11/05/99 281 GA~DEI~ 1108408 SUPPLIES 0.00 423.39
1020 573066 11/05/99 281 C~ENI~ 6308540 PARTS 0.91 11.93
~AL CHECK 243.17 3614.19
..&0 573067 11/05/99 282 GARROD FARMS/STABLES 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 640.00
1020 573068 11/05/99 776 OCS WESTERN POWER & EQUI 6308540 EQUIPMENT PARTS 0.00 141.72
1020 573069 11/05/99 291 GOLDEN TOUCH LANDSCAPING 4209108 L~/~DSCAPE REPAIR 0.00 16071.00
1020 573069 11/05/99 291 GOLDEN TOUCH LANDSCAPING 1108315 ~,ABOR AND PLANTS 0.00 2250.00
1020 573069 11/05/99 291 GOLDEN TOUCH ~CAPING 1108315 LABOR AND P~M~TS 0.00 4650.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 22971.00
1020 S73070 11/05/99 H GOODg~R/q, MARILYN 110 REFUND DEPOSIT 250710 0.00 100.00
1020 573071 11/05/99 296 KAREN GOTTLBIB 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 1728.00
1020 573072 11/05/99 1276 GOO~J~'T EXPRESS 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 111.15
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 OEAINGER INC 1108530 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 152.92
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 G~AINGER INC 1108530 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 90.05
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 ~%,/NG~ INC 1108501 PARTS a SUPPLXES 0.00 251.84
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 GRAINGER INC 1108530 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 436.63
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 GEAXNGER XNC 1108530 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 720.66
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 GEAINGER INC 1108303 SUPPLIES 0.00 84.23
1020 573073 11/05/99 298 G~AINGES ZNC 6306540 SUPPLIES 0.00 23.41
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1759.74
1020 573074 11/05/99 299 GRRNT THORNTON LLP 1104000 FINANCIAL AUGIT SVCS 0.00 20000.00
~ 573075 11/05/99 1597 LAUHA GREEN SS0OO00 FASHIUN SHOW 0.00 S0.00
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08~42:57 - FXIO~iCXALACCOt~JTXNG
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransac~.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ............. ~VENDOR ............. FUND/DSPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUN~
1020 573076 11/05/99 M GROSS, TINA 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 146.0~
1020 S73077 11/05/99 853 JERRY HAAG 1107302 PROFESSIONAL SVC 10/99 0.00 2220.C
1020 573078 11/05/99 320 KATHI HARKNESS 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM · 0.00 · 1152.0C
1020 573079 11/05/99 327 HELLO DIRECT INC 1108602 SUPPLIES 0.00 132.04
1020 573080 11/05/99 1235 HIG~ARK LIFE INSURANCE 110 LIFE & AD&D /MEMETZ 0.00 -205.92
1020 573080 11/05/99 1235 HIOHMARK LIFE INSUR~CE 6414570 ADJ LTD/MEMETZ 0.00 -116.08
1020 573080 11/05/99 1235 HIGh'MARK LIFB INSURANCE 6414570 LTD 11/99 0.00 3349.35
1020 573080 11/05/99 1235 HIGX~K LIFE INSURANCE 110 LIFE & AD&D 11/99 0.00 8789.56
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 11616.91
1020 573081 11/05/99 1527 HOFF~ VIDEO SYSTEMS 4209524 EQUIPMENT ROCK 179.77' 2558.77
1020 573082 11/05/99 M HOLLER, GORDON 5700000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 99.00
1020 573083 11/05/99 1598 HORNBLOWER 5506549 MONTE CARLO 11/11/99 0.00 960.00
1020 S73084 11/05/99 M HSU, SHU CHIN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 55.25
1020 573085 11/05/99 336 HU~4ANE SOCIETY OF SANTA 1104530 FIELD SVC/SHELTER 12/9 0.00 .67
1020 573086 11/05/99 341 ICE CHALET 5806449 RECREATION PROGRJ%M 0.00 2584.00
1020 573087 11/05/99 M IMPA 1104510 MEMBERSHIP DUES 0.00 140.00
1020 573067 11/05/99 M IMPA 1104510 PUBLICATIONS 0,00 267.00
TOTAl, CHECK 0.00 407.00
1020 573088 11/05/99 M INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTAT 1108601 ANNUAL DUES 0.00
1020 573088 11/05/99 M INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTAT 1108601 MEMBERSHIP DUES 0.00 240.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 435.00
1020 573089 11/05/99 349 INTERIM PERSOLqNBL 1107301 TEMP/PLANNXNG 0.00 342.00
· 1020 573089 11/05/99 349 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1107301 TEMP/PhAIqNIN~ 0.00 360.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 702.00
1020 573090 11/05/99 M ITO, I~IKO 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 82.00
1020 573091 11/05/99 lS24 ~EFFREY JADRXCK 5806249 CATERIN~ SERVICES 0.00 507.00
1020 573092 11/05/99 M JENSEN, JAN 5800000 RECRF~TXON REFUND 0.00 114.00
1020 573093 11/05/99 N KAMAT, NIRUPAMA 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R5183 0.00 100.00
1020 573094 11/05/99 935 KAR PRODUCTS 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 187.93
1020 573094 11/05/99 935 KAR PRODUCTS 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 132.88
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 320.81
1020 573095 11/05/99 879 REYSER MARSTONASSOCXATE 1104001 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 S~ d0
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08:42:57 - FXNANCXAL ACCOUNTXNG
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 8
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
ECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and '5?3209"
FUND - 110 - GENE]~ FU~qD
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573095 11/05/99 879 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATE 2507304 PROF SVCS 9/1-10/10/99 0.00 3475.65
1020 573095 11/05/99 879 KRYSER ~U~RSTON ASSOCIATE 2507304 PROF SVCS 9/99 0.00 31159.53
TOT~J~ CHECK 0.00 39690.18
1020 573096 11/05/99 376 KNORR SYSTEMS INC 5606620 SERVICE C~L 9/24/99 0.00 132.00
1020 573097 11/05/99 M I~KAYA, ELINA 5600000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 12.00
1020 573098 11/05/99 1258 DONNA KREY 1103300 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 174.00
1020 573099 11/05/99 382 KWIK-KOPY PRINTING 5506549 NEWSLETTER NOV 99 0.00 308.51
1020 573100 11/05/99 M Ii, ON, SALLY 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 30.00
1020 573101 11/05/99 M LEE, DONG HEE 5700000 RECRETION REFUHD 0.00 43.00
1020 573102 11/05/99 M LEE, EUGENE 5700000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 86.00
1020 573103 11/05/99 400 LIFETIME TENNIS' 5706450 T~IqIS INSTRUC'FZON 0.O0 23333.16
'1020 573104 11/05/99 M LIU0 HUA-FU 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 45.00
) 573105 11/05/99 403 A~ELO M I~ 1108602 I~OR & MATERIALS 0.00 915.38
1020 573106 11/05/99 404 I~GS DR~ S~)I~S #260 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00. 22.90
1020 573106 11/05/99 404 LONGS DRUG STORES #260 5806349 SUPPLIES 0.00 7.82
TOTAJd CHECK 0.00 30.72
1020 573107 11/05/99 1263 AL LOPEZ 5806649 PERFORMER 0.00 200.00
1020 573108 11/05/99 408 LOS GATOS MEATS 5806649 SUPPLIES 0.00 264.21
1020 573109 11/05/99 413 M. LEE CORPORATIO~I 5709212 PROFESSIONAJd SERVICE 0.00 1360.00
1020 573109 11/05/99 413 M. LEE CORPORATIO~q 5709209 PROFESSIONAJ~ SERVICES 0.00 1700.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3060.00
1020 573110 11/05/99 415 K~N MACKAY 5806449 RECREATION PROGRJ~4 0.00 185.60
1020 573111 11/05/99 1007 MAGIC GLO 5806649 SUPPLIES 0.00 348.42
1020 573112 11/05/99 1599 MANAGED HEALTH NRTMORK ! 1104510 EAP 10/99 0.00 503.60
1020 573112 11/05/99 1599 MANAGED HEALTH NETMORK I 1104510 EAP 11/99 0.00 603,60
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1207.20
1020 573113 11/05/99 422 ROHNIE MANSOOR 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 183.40
1020 573114 11/05/99 1602 ~IAMU~qISENVICES COMPAN 1100000 SALES TAX AUDIT 0.00 7719.90
1020 573115 11/05/99 M MERCER, MONDAY 1100000 RRCREATION REFUND 0.00 100.00
573116 11/05/99 437 I~RO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 LRGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 345.00
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TI~ 08:42:58 - FINANCIAL ACCOL~TING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE g
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209'
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573116 11/05/99 437 METRO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 LEGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 400.0r
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 745.0
1020 573117 11/05/99 439 MICHAELS #13333 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 16.70
1020 573118 11/05/99 443 MILLENNIUM MECHANICAL IN 1106500 SERVICE ORDER 0.00 2257.00
1020 573118 11/05/99 443 MILJuENNIUM MECHANICAL IN 1108502 SERVICE CALL 0.00 955.16
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3212.16
1020 573119 11/05/99 975 MINUTEMAN HOLLERS 5606640 PARTS 0.00 239.00
1020 573120 11/05/99 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 UNIFORM SERVICES 0.00 72.43
1020 573120 11/05/99 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 UNIFORM SERVICES 0.00 72.43
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 144.66
1020 573121 11/05/99 448 MISSION VALLEY FORD INC 6308540 PARTS 0.00 8.32
1020 573122 11/05/99 1383 MITCHEr.T. EROS.AUTO PARTS 6308540 PARTS 1.80 23.G0
1020 573122 11/05/99 1383 MITCHELL EROS.AUTO PARTS 6308540 PARTS 3.50 45.96
1020 573122 11/05/99 1363 MITCHELL EROS.AUTO PARTS 6308540 PARTS 6.20 81.41
TOTAL CHECK 11.50 150.99
1020 573123 11/05/99 455 HEATHER MOLL 5606249 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 .50
1020 573124 11/05/99 463 VICTOR G MOSSOTT! E806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 345.00
1020 573125 11/05/99 1550 ADONIS L NECESITO 1103501 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 240.00
1020 573126 11/05/99 M NEJAT, FARIBA 1100000 REFUND ROOM RENTAL FEE 0.00 100.00
1020 573127 11/05/99 192 NOVACARS OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 PPD TUBERCULOSIS INTRA 0.00 15.00
1020 573127 11/05/99 192 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 PPDTUBERCULOSIS INTRA 0.00 15.00
1020 S73127 11/05/99 192 NOVA~ OCCUPATIONAL HE 1104510 PRE-PLACEMENT PHYSICAL 0.00 220.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 250.00
1020 573128 11/05/99 1600 JEREMIAH O'BRXRN 5506549 GUIDED TOUR 0.00 400.00
1020 573129 11/05/99 M O'DO,D, MICHAEL 5806649 REIMEURSEMENT 0.00 249.13
1020 573130 11/05/99 494 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PIJ~ 1101500 SUPPLIES 0.00 118.20
1020 573130 11/05/99 494 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500 SUPPLIES 0.00 63.36
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 101.64
1020 573131 11/05/99 495 OFFICE HELPER 1104300 SUPPLIES 38.42 568,31
1020 573132 11/05/99 1190 RO~IAIZ) OLDS 1103500 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 135.00
1020 573133 11/05/99 508 P g R S - HEALTH 110 INS PREMiuM 11/99 0.00 36293.92
1020 573133 11/05/99 508 P E R S - HEALTH 1104510 INS PREMIUM 11/99 0.00 14579.73
1020 573133 11/05/99 508 P E R S - HEALTH 1104510 ADt,~ FEES 11/99 0.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 51. · 31
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08~42:58 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE lO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between '572977" and '573209"
FUND - 110 - GENER~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573134 11/05/99 526 P~NINSU~A BLUEPRINT 110 BLUELINE PRINTS #12348 0.00 428 . 59
1020 573134 11/05/99 $26 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 RLUELINE PRINTS #12487 0.00 301.22
1020 573134 11/05/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 2308004 BLACKLINE PRINTS 0.00 37.22
1020 573134 11/05/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 BLUELINE PRINTS #12348 0.00 415.60
1020 573134 11/05/99 526 PENINSUI~A BLUEPRINT 110 FIXED LINE PHOTO#12449 0.00 43 , 39
1020 573134 11/05/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 ELUELINE PRINTS #12348 0.00 264.73
1020 573134 11/05/99 526 PENINSU~ ]~LUEPRINT 110 BLUELINE PRINTS #12348 0.00 415.32
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1906 . 07
1020 573135 11/05/99 M PEREZ, AURORA 1100000 ROOM RENTAL/CREEKSIDE 0.00 -50.00
1020 573135 11/05/99 M PEREZ, AURORA 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R 4883 0.00 100.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 50 . 00
1020 573136 11/05/99 545 .JEFF PISERCHIO 5606640 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 1705.00
1020 573137 11/05/99 1296 JANET LEE POWER 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 28.98
1020 S73138 11/05/99 559 PRO~ECT SENTINEL 1104510 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 4829.88
1020 573139 11/05/99 570 RADIO SHACK FILE #96062 5806649 SUPPLIES 0.00 28.08
573140 11/05/99 1566 RAILWAY DISTRIBUTING 1108407 SUPPLIES 70.36 923.21
,_-0 573140 11/05/99 1566 RAIIMAY DISTRIBUTING 1108407 SUPPLIES 14.43 189.32
TOTAL CHECK 84.79 1112.53
1020 573141 11/05/99 M P~PALIaI, RAJ~qDRA 5700000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 49.00
1020 573142 11/05/99 1406 RANTES CHEVORLET 6308540 PARTS 0.10 1.27
1020 573142 11/05/99 1406 RANIES CHEVORLET 6308540 PARTS 9.12 119.62
1020 573142 11/05/99 1406 I~TES CHEVOR~.BT 6308540 P/~TS 1.21 15.85
1020 573142 11/05/99 1406 R~IES CHEVOR~ET 6308540 PARTS 3.64 47.72
1020 573142 11/05/99 1406 R~I~S CH~VORI~ 6308540 PARTS 0.50 6.58
TOTAL CHECK 14.57 191.04
1020 573143 11/05/99 M RAO. CHANDRA 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 100.00
1020 573144 11/05/99 576 REED & GRAHAM /NC 2708404 SUPPLIES 0.00 87.88
1020 573144 11/05/99 576 REED a GRAHAM INC 2708404 SUPPLIES 0.00 42.76
1020 573144 11/05/99 576 REED & GRAHAM THC 2708404 SUPPT.IES 0.00 89.92
TOTAL CHECK 0 . O0 220 . 56
1020 573145 11/05/99 M RENAISSANCE ROOFING INC 1100000 REFUND BL FEE PD Ti~ICE 0.00 86.00
1020 573146 11/05/99 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108602 Id~BOR & MATRRIALS 0.00 4288.00
1020 573146 11/05/99 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108602 LABOR a MATRRIALS 0.00 4402.00
TOTAL CHECK O. O0 8690. O0
1020 573147 11/05/99 1417 JBNNXFER ROZ#OOD 5806649 PERFORMER 0.00 400.00
573148 11/05/99 614 SAFE MOVES 1108603 PROF SVC 6/99 0.00 720.00
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08:42:59 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 11
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573148 11/05/99 614 SAFE MOVES 1108603 PROF SVC 7/99 0.00 1080.00
1020 573148 11/05/99 614 SAFE MOVES 1108603 PROF SVC 5/99 0.00 1260.0t
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3060.0(
1020 573149 11/05/99 620 SAN JOSE CONSERVATI°N CO 1108601 INTER/D CAMARILLO 8/99 0.00 1856.00
1020 573150 11/05/99 959 SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS 1104000 SUBSCRIPTION 10/24-1/2 0.00 44.01
1020 573151 11/05/99 M SANTA CX,I~RA COUNTY EAR A 1101500 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 142.00
1020 573152 11/05/99 628 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5606620 SECURITY 0.00 665.32
1020 573153 11/05/99 628 SANTA CIJ~RA COUNTY SHERI 1102100 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 0.00 384846.67
1020 573154 11/05/99 633 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SRERI 1108601 SECURITY 0.00 2090.13
1020 S73155 11/05/99 637 SA~TOGA BUILDERS 2809213 TIME AND MATERIALS 0.00 4595.16
1020 573156 11/05/99 M SCHLOSSER, RITA 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R5209 0.00 S00.00
1020 573157 11/05/99 M SCHULTZ, CYNTHIA 5506549 REIMEURSEMENT 0.00 93.56
1020 573158 11/05/99 M SEFCHOVICH, MARILYN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 00
1020 573159 11/05/99 651 SIERRA PACZFIC TURFSUPP 5606640 SUPPLIES 0.00 308.06
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SISRRASAFBTYSTJPPLY 1108507 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 17.59
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIEJtRA SAFETY SUPPL~ 1108509 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 39.40
1020 S73160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108505 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 78.70
1020 S73160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108507 FIRST AXD SUPPLXES 0.00 31.88
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108504 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 64.65
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108503 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 100.02
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108503 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 113.12
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIFd~RA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108501 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 82.27
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIP~RA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108501 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 76.75
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108501 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 69.71
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIeRRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108501 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 72.74
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108504 FIRST AID SUPPLXES 0.00 40.81
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SX~P, RA .~AFEI"/ b~JPPLY 1108504 FXRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 75.34
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108503 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 120.81
1020 573160 11/05/99 1208 SIERRA SAFETY SUPPLY 1108503 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 0.00 118.53
TOTAl, CHECK 0.00 1102.30
1020 573161 11/05/99 M SILICON VALLEY MRNUFACTU 1101000 SANDEA JAMBS 0.00 125.00
1020 573162 11/05/99 M SILICON VALLEY M~ACTU 1101000 DON BURN~TT 0.00 125.00
1020 573163 11/05/99 658 SILVF, RADO SPRINGS BOTT~ 1104510 WATER 0.00 99.00
1020 573163 11/05/99 658 SILVERADO SPRINOS BOTTI~ 1104510 WATER 0.00 98.00
1020 573163 11/05/99 658 SILVSRADO SPRINGS ~ 1104510 WATER 0.00 *0
1020 573163 11/05/99 658 SILV~RRDOSPRINGS'BOTTLE 1104510 WATER 0.00 a0
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TINE 08:42:59 - FXNANCXAL A~XSU
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 12
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: $/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
~CTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and "573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573163 11/05/99 658 SILVERADO SPRINGS BOTTLE 1104510 WATER 0.00 88.00
TOT/~ CHECK 0.00 450.00
1020 573164 11/05/99 669 SPRAY MART 2708405. SUPPLIES 0.00 51.80
1020 573165 11/05/99 671 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHIN 1101500 SERVICE CALL 0.00 112.00
1020 573166 11/05/99 1421 STAN~Y STF~R 1108504 Z~OR 0.00 741.00
1020 573167 11/05/99 M STERN° DANA 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 63.00
1020 573168 11/05/99 681 CONNIE BANDA STEVENS 5806449 RECREATION PROGR~ 0.00 400.00
1020 573169 11/05/99 M S~)LITZKA, DALE 5800000 RECREATION REF~ 0.00 114.00
1020 573170 11/05/99 686 DARRYL STOW 2204010 LC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 0.00 750.00
1020 573171 11/05/99 690 SUNNYVAT~ FORD 6308540 PARTS 2.56 33.64
1020 573171 11/05/99 690 SUI~ALE FORD 6308540 PARTS 0.16 2.10
TOTAL CHECK 2.72 35.74
1020 573172 11/05/99 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806249 SUPPLIES 10/28/99 0,00 391.25
573172 11/05/99 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806649 SUPPLIES 0.00 351.00
573172 11/05/99 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806249 SUPPLIES 10/21/99 0.00 652.51
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1404.78
1020 573173 11/05/99 1601 TAR 1101500 SUPPLIES 0.00 154.37
1020 573174 11/05/99 696 TADCO SUPPLY 1108315 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.19
1020 573174 11/05/99 696 TADCO SUPPLY 1108314 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.19
1020 573174 11/05/99 595 TADCOSUPPLY 1108302 · SUPPLIES 0.00 29.19
1020 573174 11/05/99 696 TADCO SUPPLY 1108312 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.19
1020 573174 11/05/99 696 TADCO SUPPLY 1108303 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.19
1020 573174 11/05/99 696 TADCO SUPPLY 1108321 SUPPhIES 0.00 29.19
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 175.14
1020 573175 11/05/99 698 TALLYeS ENTERPRISES 2708403 RECONSTRUCTION OF CURB 0.00 14287.78
1020 573175 11/05/99 698 TALLY'S ~NTE~PRISES 2159620 U~iDERGROU~ID DRAINAGE S 0.00 6200.00
1020 573175 11/05/99 698 TALLY'S ENTERPRISES 2708403 RECONSTRUCTION OF CURB 0.00 18109.82
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 36597.58
1020 573176 11/05/99 M T~EJA, SANJIV 5700000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 43.00
1020 573177 11/05/99 599 TAP PLASTICS INC 1108506 SUPPLIES 0.00 32.59
1020 573178 11/05/99 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108407 SUPPLIES 44.07 578.31
1020 573178 11/05/99 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108407 SUPPLIES 4.94 64.78
1020 573178 11/05/99 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108407 SUPPLIES 47.84 627.76
1020 573178 11/05/99 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108407 SUPPLIES 0.21 2.71
T~L CHECK 97.06 1273.58
!
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08:43:00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 13
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.check_no between "572977" and #573209"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573179 11/05/99 701 TARGET STORES 8706450 FILM DEVELOPING 0.00 18.99
1020 573179 11/05/99 701 TARGET STORES 1106343 SUPPLIES 0.00 9.82
1020 573179 11/05/99 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 SUPPLIES 0.00 66.97
1020 573179 11/05/99 701 TARGET STORES 1106343 SUPPLIES 0.00 5.39
1020 573179 11/05/99 701 TARGET STORES 5806449 SUPPLIES 0.00 21.64
1020 573179 11/05/99 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 SUPPLIES 0.00 -26.19
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 149.00
1020 573180 11/05/99 1013 TAX COLLE~TTOR 1108001 PROPERTY TAX 99-00 0.00 321.34
1020 573181 11/05/99 1013 TAX COLLECTOR 1108706 PROPERTY TAX 99-00 0.00 303.12
1020 573102 11/05/99 1193 TOMARK SPORTS 5806449 SUPPLIES 0.00 133.69
1020 573183 11/05/99 M TOSHIMA, KAZUKO 5700000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 98.00
1020 573184 12/05/99 717 PAMELA j TREDER 2308004 DOCENT/COORDINATOR 0.00 1031.45
1020 573185 11/05/99 M TROGZECH, MANFPJgD 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R 8630 0.00 500.00
1020 573186 11/05/99 M TSAO, JEAN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 110.50
1020 573187 11/05/99 724 TURF A INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 6308540 SUPPLIES 1.48 40
1020 573187 11/05/99 724 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 5606640 EQUIPMENT PARTS 0.00 ~9.43
TOTAL CHECK 1.48 88.83
1020 573188 11/05/99 M TUTTLE, LUCETTA 5600000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 10.00
1020 573189 11/05/99 961 US BANK 3105306 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 525.00
1020 573190 11/05/99 M UTTARWAR, VEENA 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R8152 0.00 100.00
1020 573191 11/05/99 M VALDEZ, MARIA 110 REFUND DEPOSIT R 4884 0.00 100.00
1020 573192 11/05/99 738 VAT.Y~y OIL COMPANY 6308540 FUEL 23.12 358.32
1020 573192 11/05/99 738 VALLEY OIL CONPANY 6308540 FUEL 24.10 374.78
1020 573192 11/05/99 738 V~Y,L~Y OIL COHPANY 8308540 FUEL 36.54 551.86
TOTAL CHECK 83.76 1284.96
1020 573193 11/05/99 750 V/SION SERVIC~ PI, AN 110 VISION INS #1207446100 0.00 1904.30
1020 573194 11/05/99 745 VMI INC 1103500 REPAIR 0.00 134.81
1020 573195 11/05/99 754 B~J~BABA WALTON 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 . 1728.00
1020 573196 11/05/99 1559 WATEIN & BORTOLUES/, XNC 4219310 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 36156.50
1020 573197 11/05/99 761 NgD~YER BAKEltY 5806649 SUPPLIES O.O0 74.03
1020 573198 11/05/99 766 NEST BAY STT~4P REMOVAL I 1108408 STT~NP GRINDING SERVICE 0.00 ] 90
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TIME 08:43:00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
~1/o~/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO ~A~£ 14
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
~CTION CRITERIA: =ransacu.check_no between "572977" and '573209"
FUND - 110 - GENER~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 573199 11/05/99 768 WEST GROUP 1101500 LEGAL FILING DIRECTORY 0.00 68.74
1020 573200 11/05/99 1395 DAVID M WILLIAMS 5606620 SERVICE CALL 0.00 103.00
1020 573201 11/05/99 M WOODS, LYNN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 51.00
1020 573202 11/05/99 M WU, PIoHSUN 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 32.50
1020 573203 11/05/99 M XXNG, HONG 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 42.00
1020 573204 11/05/99 M YEATS, NINA 1100000 REFUND/CANCELLED PEP. MI 0.00 80.00
1020 573205 11/05/99 800 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING XNC 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 28.07
1020 573206 11/05/99 799 ZANKER ROAD LANDFILL 5208003 YARD WASTE PROCESSING 0.00 16676.67
1020 573206 11/05/99 799 Z~KER ROAD LANDFILL 5208003 COMPOST DELIVERIES 9/9 0.00 200.00
1020 573206 11/05/99 799 ZANKER ROAD LANDFILL 5208003 YARD WASTE PROCESSING 0.00 117.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 16993.67
1020 573207 11/05/99 M ZHU, XUE 5800000 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 46.75
1~0 573208 11/05/99 805 ZT~4WALT ENGINEERING GROU 1108601 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 608.00
,.~0 573209 11/05/99 1558 JOSE ZUNIGA JR. 1106265 SECURITY 0.00 195.00
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 1180.34 1007951.01
TOTAL FUND 1180.34 1007951.01
TOTAL REPORT 1180.34 1007951.01
RUN DATE 11/05/99 TZME 08:43:01 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTTNG
11/05/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE i
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
"'T,ECTION CRITERIA: =ransacC.t_c-"20" and Cransact.=rans_date between "11/02/1999" and "11/05/1999,
FUND - 110 o GENERA~ FUND
CAS~ ~CCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX A~OUNT
1020 572531 V 10/08/99 1552 SANTA CLARA COUNTY HSALT 5509549 SUPPLIES 0.00 -232.5c
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 -232.5~
TOTAl, FUND 0.00 -232.50
TOTAL REPORT 0.00 -232.S0
I ,007,951 -01+
~t,l~ 2 ~ 2 · ~ o -
000
1,00'I,'ll 8' 51'
RL~ DATE 11/0S/99 TIME 08:45:03
RESOLUTION NUMBER 99-331
A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES
AND WAGES PAID ON
OCTOBER 29, 1999
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative
has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds
for payment hereof; and
WI-IBP, BAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law;
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the
following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth:
GROSS PAYROLL $367,834.14
Less Employee Deductions $( 117,791.81)
NET PAYROLL $250,042.33
Payroll check numbers issued 44149 through 44382
CERjT~IED: · . /]
Director of Administrative Services '
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15th day of November ,1999, by the following Vote:
Vote M~nbers of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
'--' City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
Citv Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Cl'rY OF Telephone: (408) 777-3220
CUPERJINO Fax: (408)777-3366
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. Meeting Date: November 15, 1999
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Review of Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Funding Allocation
BACKGROUND
AB3229 (Bmlte) was enacted as part of the state budget package. The bill establishes the COPS
program and appropriates $100 million from the state general fund for the 1999-2000 fiscal year.
The COPS program provides funding for local agencies for the purpose of ensuring public safety.
The City of Cupertino has received $105,811 for fiscal year 1999-2000.
USE OF FUNDS
Cities are required to appropriate COPS revenues to fund front line municipal police services.
This can include anti-gang and community crime prevention programs. The funds are to be
appropriated pursuant to a written request from the Chief of Police or the Chief Administrator of
the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. Capt. Jeff Miles has
submitted the attached recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the sheriff's request for the expenditure of
COPS funds.
Submitted by: Approved for submission:
Carol A. Atwood Donald D. Brown
Director of Administrative Services City Manager
Printect on Recyclecl P~per
RESOLUTION NO: 99-332
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO APPROVING REQUEST FROM SHERIFF FOR USE
OF AB 3229 (BRULTE) CITIZENS' OPTION FOR PUBLIC
SAFETY (COPS) PROGRAM FUNDS OF $105,811
WHEREAS, AB 3229 (Brulte) was enacted as part of the state budget program; and
WHEREAS, the bill establishes the Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) program
and appropriates $100 million from the state general fund for the 1999-2000 fiscal year and the
City of Cupertino's per capita share is $105,811 for fiscal year 1999-2000; and
WHEREAS, the COPS program provides funding for local agencies for the purpose of
ensuring public safety; and
WHEREAS, cities are required to appropriate COPS revenues to fund front line
municipal police services which can include anti-gang and community crime prevention
programs; and
WHEREAS, these funds are to be appropriated pursuant to a written request from the
Chief of Police or the Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police
services for that city.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino
hereby approves the Sheriff's request for the expenditures of AB 3229 Citizens' Option for
Public Safety (COPS) funds.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15th day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
CUPERTINO
1999-2000
"COPS"
Citizen's Option for Public Safety
Office of the Sheriff
County of Santa Clara
CITIZENS' OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS)
PROGRAM TOTAL
School Resource Officer $36,667.00
Patrol Bicycles/Overtime Fund 14,600.00
Mobil Command Post Computer System 10,000.00
Sage Guns 9,800.00
Stop Sticks 7,800.00
Social Advocates for Youth 7,500.00
Preliminary Alcohol Screening Device 6,500.00
Fatal Vision Educational Goggles 4,200.00
Safe Restraints "The Wrap" 3,800.00
Maintenance/Repair Fund 2,800.00
Public Dialogue Consortium $1,634.00
In-Car Video Equipment 510.00
TOTAL $105,811.00
School Resource Officer (SRO)
Thc primary function of the School Resource Officer (SRO) is to establish and maintain a
positive relationship within thc schools of Cuperlino. The SRO shall be available as a
resource for all members of thc academic community. The SRO shall present a positive
image of the Office of the Shcriffand law enforcement in general.
A School resource Officer is a law enforcemen! officer who is assigned to a single
elementary, middle or high school or to a number of schools. The main goal of the SRO is
to prevent juvenile delinquency by promoting positive relations between youth and law
enforcement. The SRO position encompasses three major components that allow the SRO
to achieve this goal: law enforcement, education, and counseling. These three
components allow the SRO to take proactive approach to law enforcement. SROs are not
just "cops" on campus; however, they teach law-related education and other relevant
topics, they counsel students on various topics and are involved in the students lives as
positive role models. Some SROs are not teachers because of department policy.
However, their actions teach through positive role modeling. The intent is that the
positive experience's students have with the SRO will bridge the gap between juveniles
and law enforcement, and in doing so, help prevent juvenile crime.
Other SRO duties include; interact with and be a resource for the principals, vice or
assistant principals, dezn.~ and other ~,dmini.~-atorS of each school (grades K- 12). Interact
with and be a resource for the faculty of each school and encourage teachers to involve
'the officer in class siV,~fions. Interact with and be a resource for the school di._~rict
superintendents and school board members. Attend meetings and be a resource for the
PTA and other parent groups as necessary. Work with school officials and parent groups
to safeguard the safety of students and staff on and around school campuses. Work with
the Suvenile Probation Department to establish and maintain youth pwgrams including
peer courts, diversion alternatives, mumcy abatement and early intervention. Provide
reports and statistical data to department staff and city govemmenL
This position will be funded with 1/3 "COPS" funds, 1/3 funding fi'om the Fremont and
Cupertino Union School Districts, and 1/3 funding fi.om the City of Cupertino.
COST
"COPS" Funds $36,667.00
COMMUNITY BICYCLE PATROL AND NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH SUPPORT
Conventional methods of patrolling - vehicles, motorcycles, and foot beats do not meet
all the needs of today's changing environment. There is a need for new and innovative
patrol methods. Mountain bicycles were chosen for this task because of their versatility,
durability and mobility. Bicycle patrols have proven to be one oftbe most effective
methods in combating and preventing criminal activities.
The City of Seattle, Washington started a bicycle patrol in 1987 and there are now
currently over an estimated 1,000 police bicycle patrols in the United States. Agencies
have found advantages that include cost effectiveness, increased arrests and
overwhelming positive public response. The positive response comes fi.om increased
public interaction, high visibility and a more approachable policing style the patrols offer.
The bicycles fit in well with community policing where the bicycle is used as a tool to
promote work and increase community contact.
An effective bicycle patrol unit is comprised of two deputies riding together in parks,
shopping centers, school campuses, high density housing complexes, neighborhoods and
other congested areas. The deputies will utilize a patrol car equipped with a bicycle rack
to transport their equipment to the areas where they are needed. The bicycles are
--- equipped with l¥~hting devices for nighttime use, storage bags, locks and repair
equipment. Each deputy will wear a safety helmet and full duty belt. The deputy will
also wear a distinctively marked polo shirt and bicycle shorts. Communications will be
by use of the standard hand-held portable radio.
This unit is currently utilized for special events including Forth of July Celebration,
Cupertino Art & Wine Festival, Cupertino Parade, Tournament of Bands, Octoberfest,
Cupertino Cherry Tree Festival, and crime suppression in selected target areas.
Four fully equipped patrol bicycles were purchased using prior '~OPS" funds. With the
approval of these expenditures, this will increase the bicycle patrol fleet to a total of eight
fully equipped patrol bicycles. This would allow for sufficient coverage for special
details and events.
The overtime fund will provide training for new officers, and pay for the officers for
special events.
Costs: 4 Police Bicycles and equipment $4,600.00
Bicycle Patrol Overtime Fund $10,000.00
Total Costs: $14,600.00
MOBILE COMMAND POST COMPUTER SYSTEM
The Mobile Command Post Computer System. This system would allow a patrol sergeant
to set up a mobile command post in any location and provide ali of the same capabilities
that are available in a fixed location. This would included Internet, email and fax
capabilities via cellular telephone channels, Global Positioning Satellite ((]PS) capabilities,
computer mapping and printing.
This system would allow the transmission of printed information between a supervisor in
the field and any other location such as City Hall, Headquarters and County
Communications. The capability to quickly transfer written data as well as Internet access
has more benefits that can be listed.
Off-the shelf and speci~li~.ed software would provide the mapping of all urban, urban
interface and rural areas without the burden of carrying large amounts of printed maps.
The nature of law enforcement frequently requires the fidd supervisor to quickly set-up a
command post centered around his vehicle or in some other temporary location. All field
supervisors currently have verbal communications via cellular telephone and two-way
radio but there are no capabilities for transmitting text and graphics information. The field
supervisor can be called upon to coordinate a large number of units during events such as
an area search for a suspect or in response to a disaster. The successful response to an
incident such as these requires a variety of maps. In the ~ environment this need is
best met with a map of streets and addresses. The map books cmrently provided to not
adequately meet this requirement as they are large scale maps (a large area covered in a
small amount of space) and they do not show addresses, only streets. A computerized
street map that can be enlarged and fire maps ar~ much better suited for this purpose. In
the urban interface and in rural areas, topographic maps are ot~en the best choice. GPS
technology is a tool that benefits all areas. In order to have all of these different types of
maps available for each supervisor vehicle requires a significant investment as well as a
large amount of storage space. Using the various maps currently available on CR-ROM is
a better alternative. These maps, along with GPS equipment, would allow the field
supervisor to quickly access the map most appropriate to the situation. The addition of a
portable printer makes copies available to be produced and distributed as necessary.
The core of this system is a portable computer with a CD-ROM drive and a modem. The
addition of a cellular modem and a printer as well as the mapping and GPS sot~ware
would complete the system.
It would take three complete systems to outfit each supervisor's car. It would be idea] to
purchase six computers (one for each patrol sergeant) and three sets of peripherals and
software (one for each car). This proposal is.for the purchase of two complete systems.
HARDWARE
Gateway Solo 2150 Portable Computer $1899.00
Dell lnspiron 3500 Portable Computer $2109.00
Deli Inspiron 7500 Portable Computer $2589.00
Accessories (Carrying case, charger units, etc $ 100.00
Canon B,JC-50 Bubble ~Tet Printer $ 359.00
Additional Printer Cartridge (black) $ 39.00
Additional Printer Cartridge (color) $ 45.00
Global Freedom 5660 Cellular Modem $ 249.00
Global Freedom 5660 Cable Upgrade for Motorola $ 99.00
SOFTWARE
CoPilot GPS and navigation software $ 299.00
Topographic Map Software (San Francisco Bay) $ 99.00
AAA Street Map Software $ 99.00
Fire Map Software TBD
OTHER
Hardcase for printer and modem $ 200.00
Gateway: Home: port~b~: solo 2150 Page ! of 2
- ca_tew~y Entry Level.
'~'~ "~ So 10. 2150 Feature-Rich.
~,~.~,,..,~,~.,o, Affordable.
· starling at only $1599 including intema~
modern and support for an IOMEGA Zip
drive. But that's not all One look at the
2150's large display, superior video and
- ~'~ flexible modular option bay design, and
Find one for you.
ma4al · P __mc~__---~___ Memory Screen Hard Ddve Battery
Inte~
Celeron"' 6-c~1 $1599
Processor Lithium Ion ~anf
2t~4lc~ 400MHz 32MB 12.1" 4GB battery and · one?.
wI128K Full AC pack O info
Cek,ron'" 6-c~ $172~
Lithium Ion ,want
21~Cl ~ 400MHz 32MB 12.1' 4GB bat~ and · one?
w/128K Full AC pack ~1 info
Inte~
14.1- XGA 6-c~ $1899
Processor Active Mal~ix 4GB Lithium Ion · wanf
2l~d 4(X)MHz 64MB TFT Color battery and one?
wI128K Full ll~ info
Speed L2 O~ay AC pack
Inte~
Pmc~,~- .14.1" XGA 6-cell $2028
2t~ed,la,~ 400MHz 64MB Ac~.~ 4GB U~umk~ · ~
w/128K Full O info
Speed L2 Display AC pack
& o~def st~tu~
http://www.gateway.com/prod/hm_~2i50_Matrix.shtml 10/31/99
Gateway: Home Segment: Solo 2150 CL Page 1 of 2
C;tew;¥ $1899
So ] o. 2150c] or..,owos
$S2.75
The Sok~ 2150 gives you the fraedom to per month*
work where you want. with prices starting at (48 mcxlths)
only $1599 inoluding int~nal modem and
. support for an IOMEGA Zip drive. But that's ) Cu~omi=e It
~ not all One look at the 21~0';
_ ~ ~ supedor video and flexible modular option bay options
design, and you'll see the only thing we se~vioe &
overlooked was the big price tag. support
Feat u res
Processor Inte~) CeleronTM Processm 400MHz wI128K Full Speed 1.2 Cache
Memory 64MB SDRAM e.-.~andabio tx) 160MB
Keyboard Full Size Keyboard ~ MS Windows 95 Keys
Mouse EZ Pad~ Pointing Device
Operating Micfo~oft~ Windows 98 Sec~td Edition
NSTL Tested System
Year 2000
C omi)Ii an~ Expan$iofl Two deep socketed PCMClA Type II slots
O more info Slots
Battery 6-~11 Lithium Ion battery and AC pack
Screen 14.1" XGA ~ Matrix TFT Color Display
Hard Drive 4GB Ultra ATA Removable hard drive
Floppy Integ~a~l 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Disk Drive
Drive
CD-ROM or Modular 10X min./24X max. CD-ROM drive
DVD
2)( AGP 3D ATI MobilityM wiltt 4MB SDRAM
Zoomed Zoomed Vkieo Port
Video Port
Fax/Modem Internal V.90 56K Modem
Anti-Virus Nort~ Anti-Virus Software
Software
^pp#catio~ Microsoft~ Works Suite 99 - Including Microsoft~) Word and Encarla
Software
Service I Year Parts & Labor Limited Warranty. Limited Hardware & Software Tech
Program Support as long as you own your system
CertificatJons FCC Class B, UL and CSA certified
D,mensions 12.28inch x 10.15inch x 1.72inc, h (wxdxh), app, uxi-,at~ly 6.98 lbs
External USB, Parallel, Serial, VGA, PS/2 and R J11
Gat~ay: Home Segment: Solo 2/.50 CL Page 2 of 2
$1899
$62.76
per
(~ months)
I~ Buylt
suppor*
~y~.
Copyright E) 1997. 1996, 1999 Gateway. Inc. Ali rights msmYed.
Please see our Legal h~,,,Ndtion and Privacy StaMrnent. Please see our Temps end C, onditmn8 of S~le mhd Limimd WmTmnty.
pr=ceu~i;~g. Many products sire custom 3fiG' v..;r, KI to ~dm,w~y ,q~.~, wh~ vary fnxn,;.u. Prices qucdscl in U.S.
be guam~ by GaMway.
Dell HOme Systems - Inspiron 3500 Bundles Page ! of 2
DELL In pl 3500
· ~M, ~ ~fi~, a~ gr~ fm ~
e NEW I~~ ~ ~
· Up ~ I~B3 U~ ATA Ha~ D~ A~
~ A~ ~ a~ Su~
' S~ffi ~r U~ W~~
_ ~ Mn~ of CI~ EdH~'s C~ AwIM
ADD TO ~RT ~DD TO ~RT
CUSTOMIZE g D21CE .CUSTOMIZE ~ P~ICE
PU~IM ~in bib1 Pu~haM Pan ~ilsI Pum~N
~ 141 ~W~ 14.1'~ W ~ 141
~m ~w~ 4.~ ~ ATA 4.~ ~ ATA e.M m ATA
~~ ~ 2~ ~ V~ ~ ~r 2~ ~ V~ ~ ~r 2~ ~ Var
~ ~~V ~P ~ Wm ~V AGP
V~
~;~V~4~ .... ~~Vi~n4~ ~~V~. ' :
~ V~ ~ ~ V~ ~m ~ V~ W ~ V~
~ SYm ~M W~~ SYMr ~M W.~? SYmr L~M W~n
~ $1,7~ ~,1o~
Pu~ha~ Plan ~adst Pmcha~ PWn ~llS~ Purcha~ ~8n ~ils
WC~I ~1117 ~121F ~12~
ADD TO ~T ADD TO ~T
CUSTOMIZE & PRICE CUSTOMIZE & ~RICE
~ ~1 ~ U~:
S~1~.
. !~11 I~ S~ - [~p~m 3500 B~d~ P~ 2 of 2
I
[ ...... ~ Ir I I ' " -- 'i~:' I -1--~'-- r" --
~ 48~JIo. Purchase Plan offered ~
~ 1~ ~n.
~ ~ ~ui~.
10/32/99
Dell Home Systems - Inspiron 7500 Bundles Page 1 of 2
,-~oo.~.~s~ NEW DELL Insplr~ 7500
~ ~r~ ~ ~ e Up ~ ~B ~ AGP ATI RAGE ~1~TM P 3D'
~P~A~E~P ~A~~I~P ~P~BA~G
~ ~V~4~ ~ ~V~n4~ ~ ~V~
~ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ ~p v~ ~ ~ v~
ADD TO ~RT ADD TO ~RT
CUSTOMIZE g P~ICE CUSTOMIZE g PRICE
0~11 Home Systems - Znspirtm 7500 Bundles Page 2 of 2
http ://dell.com/forhone./bundle-7500.htm ~"'~" j ~
~allfomia Topographic Naps - (Plus Other States) - Nap Soltware Page I of I
California Topographic Maps - Map Software
Terrain Navigator (formerly
r~l'f~:n=- t, $ 3~:. ~ic maps, make up 14 CDs for the e~ire
Cove-. jr eo~tains 2805 topo maps at 1:24,000 and 117 ~ maps at 1:100,000 scale.
Click a map color below for a listing of topographic maps for that CD's re~ion.
Go To Another State
http:Hwww.mapsoftware.com/~t/CA.hl~nl 10/31199
· ~:~a,~ay: Hom~: port~t'l--: ~o 2150 Page 2 of 2
.--. Copyril~ ~ 1997, 1908, 1999 Gatlwmy, Inc. Ail I~]ilts rmmnmd.
Please m ~ ~11~,,~ ~ P~ 8~. ~ m = T~ a~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ W~.
P~ ~ ~k ~ W~ Cml. ~k~
O~ ;~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (8SL) ~
LUGGAGE
~ ' Lightweight cart carriesWorld's toughest waterproof computer case
. ZO times its weight p.,,..t y,,ur,.,,np.,er i,, ,he ~,ca. ~,ha,
T'
is clcsignc~l lo wilhslaud ~'~ w~ather
~ ~O~g~t~ly I Made of advanct~ ultra high impacl
a I~dd~ fold down handle PELICAN ~
: ~ I Padded lid o~ni~r PRODUCTS ~
" : I Optional pe~nali~ nameplate 1
· Fits bptop computers up to O-Ring ~akd
Item t 33422, $199 (QQ, l ) $1~ (QO, 5+) Shock :~..~
. Unconditional lifetime ~placement guamflt~t ~ Trey ~
; am~ with ~u, get the tort that can handle '
; 275 ~ ~t folds flat to a compact 2.5 inch~
~.~ Wi~ i~ 7.25" wh~l~ this can handl~ cu~
a~ s~ with ~ ~adv to u~, just unfold f
~ ~ ~mit~ lifetime warranty. -
Re~vable Podded ~ ~
.:' g ~S l 1.25 l~. - ~,'=, Shoulder Strap ....
I ~Me width: ]9
~ ~. .... . Wate~g~ ai~ghL and dent proof
Item ~ 26191, S1~9 (Q~ z), 5134 (Q~ 5+)
.~ 7The pqde~t low-costPortable work place An r
laptop bag PC Magazine ~ alarming
, ~ · The ~im rm
' pmbi~ of a~u~y using a laptop computer · Tra~i ~fety guide, Duracell baReri~ and
on ~ bp! ~pdog~ unique closure ~tem an insurance saving ~upon
and non dip surfaces let ~u u~ ~ur laptop A 110 db alarm sounds in the Notepac when
~e ~in~on ~ddle~g noteb~k comput- ~mfo~ably and ~curely aniline, an~la~, ~parated from owner. (10ft or 40ft)
ff ~r~ng ~ was d~ign~ for comfo~ and an~here. Its padded, fold open ~ are Automati~lly re-arms itself ~e ~ptop
bxibili~. ~e high-~city interior is padded designed to provide accessible storage for
br complete computer protection and includ~ ~mputer accessori~, ~ weU as to provide Up ~ures your laptop to a fix~ ob~ using
complete protection fi)r ~ur laptop when the your iaptop~ built-in <curity pon to p~nt
~ ~p-down organi~r to hold computer a~- brief~se is closed, walk-a-way thefts. It's the perfe~ cor~rate
eri~. ~e ~ddleBag gi~ you three car~ing
~tiom: over thc shoulder, on your back or in ~ Mili~ry s~c hardware ~urhy tooE
ee hand. ~t of all, %..i~ does not look like a · Storage for batlcries, external drives, paper ~plop Guardian,
~0mpmer ~ and therefore may ~ less likely and media item ~ 3~317, 51~ fQty i), $95 (Oty 5+)
'~a I~ tar~t~ by Ihic~." Spiril Magazine m Non slip surfaces keep your laptop sccu~ Tracklt,
~tt ~: 337~, $89 (Oty 1), ~5 (Oty 5+) item ~: 31283, S!29 (Oly I), 5125 (Qly 5+) ' Item ~: 31319, 530 (Oly I), $28 (Oty
~ Win a $1,449 JVC DualCam digital camcorder at www. iGoCorp.com/register · ~
.....;~
~ GPS
The talking nnvigation system for your car! ' ":"_. _..,
~ Winner
~ "CoPilot sh,ply wimps its competitors" ~ " . ....
· ".' ~-= -The Dallas Morning News Com,o~ie.t and portable, thc C~l'ilm i..car
: mwismio, s~stem ~mfu~ mlt~m~ ~d-timc
~able ~mpulc~ in any vehicle an~ in (h~ coumr}~ Simply enter ~mr d~i~tion, start (~m;puf~. ~;k~ if nnd~,
d~in&, ~d Ibten to ~Pilot~ p~ s~n d(rc~tmns. ~ou II ~' ~ur curvet k~tkm on thc r~~~~
:' rap, t~ ~ur pmar~ as ~u drip, and follow a hi;hli;hted mute to ~ur datiuation, l~tcr r
: ~. if ~u should mL~ a turn. ~Pilot's d~mic die, inns atmm~ati~lly provide ~u with a new ~ , ' ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ - .-"~
~ of di~ions, in addition, ~l'ilo, ~.i~ a.d r.-l-,,,a, to mo~ than 20 voice commands~ _ __ ~,~- ~;A', :~, '
' · U~ in mo~ than one car B Single ~ta CD cove~ thc entire con#into#al US ~., ~t ~ s . ~
~ I ~ G~ r~eiver I Auto~ti~lly finds ~ur sta~ io~tion ~ ~ . ' ~ ... ~
~. goor-to-goorPro ~ . ~_~,..~ ........ ~ .........
~ If ~u mi~ a turn, ~Piiot automatically
~:' ~e ~ atlas mfiwa~ that m~ns busing. Impel, ~p and get tu~-b),-turn dictions to determines the b~t n~, route to
~:. conm~ add~ in ~conds. Include up m 50 add~ and let D~r-to-D~r Pm automatically de~inagon. Inked of glancing at a map
~ p~de ~u with the most e~cient mute, Print it out, and you'~ on ~ur way. listen while ~Pilot~ state.of-the-art AT~T
~. i~ ~: 26139, $S9 (O~ I)~ ~ (Q~ 5+) t~hnoio~ tal~ )vu thmugh )~ur dirmions.
~:'
~ Never get lost again! ~ltimate notebook GPS and map
~. G~ m ~, ~ ~.~ ~ .~ ~ ~o. o. ~ ~avigatioo system
~. ~nic m~ ~p whi~ ~d~ ~ fit~, l~ ~d fi~
~d ~t~ ~t ~fomfion. A ~q~ ~-D ~i~y" ~ p~ ............
d~hy ~ ~de ~ or &~~ '~p" &e ~n for '~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Wor~ ~ ~ ~e ~rld
·~ ho~ of mn~uous ~ on
~ ba~ (not ~dud~)
&CIRmqilt
i Portable automotive navigator ~ Skylviap Pro guide your travels wi~ real-thee, easy-to-read, detailed
. maps of all 50 states. Simply download SkyMap Pro on your notebook,
J and handheld GPS ,.d you will have the power to search and find addresses by state, street,
The GARMIN StreetPiiot GPS features a large, city and zip code. You can quickly mark, store and map addresses to
automotive-grade display that shows your position on digitally record your journey so you can retrace your steps at a later date.
an electronic, real-time moving map. Insert an Sk'yMap Pro comes complete with a database of more than 700,000
optional MetroGuide cartridge (call for details) and points of interest including restaurants, banking, gas stations, en route
i find addresses and points of interest such as <~t~lkl[~l. information and business listings.
restaurants, hotels, entertainment,
: shopping and other services. ,..~ . ' ~, · · Remote control with carrying case for hand free use
~ · Dashboard mount . . .~.~...
i · 6AA batteries included .~..,._ _ _ :: ,~,~ :. ~,.,~. · Send e-mail, attach a file or launch a web page
~ "~--'~'~q~ · 12 channel GP$ receiver with PCMCI^ card
Item #: 42900, S499 ~ item #: 0105, $299 COty i), $294 COty 5+)
,, GARMIN $~reetPilot Color Mai;
Item #: 42899, ~699
it
· t~C]. You need it. We deliver it. Overnight! www. iGoCorp.com · 1-800-228-8374
...... MODEMS
563() CI; Cclluh,' C,l~h' L'p.k'r, dc~
phones
AT&T ~1~ NEC PI 10.1~,1~ ~
landlinc phones or anak~ and digital ~llular M~r~a EMe se~s ~ ~rtifi~ and compatiMc in more tout
network% thc Global Frc~om 5~ m~k'm NI ~1 t~n any other m~em, the
k~ps ~ou ~onn~ck~. ~c Global Fre~om NEC P~1~i~!~ ~ 33.6 K ~ a rci~bk, e~' to
5660 is compatibk' with international NECP~
~din8 emails or browsin~ th~ lnt~rnet
GS~/D~ digital mobile phon~ nctwor~ N0kiaGl~
over 72 countries. The ~untry
. allowin~ you to connect via your mobile ~9-~(Q~i),~-~(Q~5+) ~re included with th~ Global
phon~. ~n abroad. POP,CIA ,zodcm r~plncc,w, t c,hlc~ aU~ ~u to qui~y ~ie~ th~ d~ir~
~ ~ ~ continues for o~rations in with a pull-d~ menu.
m~tiple countri~ frll
a ~.i~ · optim~ iff ~r 7~ count
I lndud~ all ~a~ and 7 ~. phone cord GIo~l ~e~mm ~1 S15 SI4
.......... m Um with hndline phon~
~ V.~ standard, upgreadable to ~ture Global CI~m .{l~maffonalJ ~7 ~5 $14
· ~ GJob~ Fre~om 5~0 PC Global Nmgerm ~N ~1 S15 S14 ~tem ~: 8~5, $23~ (~ ~), ~2]~ (Qt), 5+)
: Item ~: 22542, 5249 (QO' I), $2~ (Qt), ~+) Global Ne~er~ M~em ~2 S15 SI4 ~ba[ ~ ~.6 Mac
~ item ~: 8~, $239 (Q~ i), $2]~ (Q~+)
A ach your cell phone to your n ebook Modem, MN and cellular in on
Ba~erie i
~ur notebook. Hoids phone ~a ~ s~ 33.6k ~i~ m~
t' upfi~t for m~mum sigfl~ .... ~ ~rd ~ b~t-in E~ ~ ~pa~
d~ when ~g. ~B /['TO~< '
I Mj~tofit~~phone ~/~ :~~;y m~em ~nn~ d~y to mo~ m~
No~ : and 0~2 ~N driers
. ~
....-re.rac..nu· Take your time and enjoy your shopping ex~rience at
modem
cable
~is han~y tra~J companion is a must ~.iGoCorp.(om. Broke our produ~ ~ ~t~o~ and
2~01 F rot anyone ~ho ~r~stl=s ~ith short, m~el number. You're sure to find w~t you need as ~11
broken hotcJ phon~ cord~ (or connca- as some of the things on your "wish Ii;.'
RE~O, { in~ m~cms. Th= ~1[ Rctracfin~
-80 pmvidm 14 feet of phone cahk' in a · Personaliz~ order verification - To ~ri~ receipt of your
compact, durable case. order, iGO will send you pe~onalized order ~rification via
~ V m i 4 feet of ret raaahJe R/I I cable e-mail aHer each and eve~ order you place with us. Your
L ~l ~ B ~lf relracling design .n verifi~tion e-mail will include the date you ordered, the
L. L v( Ix~lb ends prOud(s) you chine, the quantity and pa~ent option
dMLJ. L~ M lust 2"W x I"H you ~le~ed as well as an ETA for deli~.
Sl9(Oty l),ll7 (Oty5+) ::' .-'/-' ~ '
· ~ ~' You need it. We deliver it. Overnight~ www, iGoCorp,com · 1-800-228-8374
Ema
III I
Send end receive e-mail worldwide Portable hi-res color
,~.,, ~ ..~t ,.~i.s .i,~o,, ,~ c~,,,~, printin§ and scannin~
~nd n~ ~ ~mil or ~ online an~he~ No other small, )i~ht ~i~ht ~,~ahle primer
in thc ~dd. ~ the ~up~r in the m~t ~s ~nt it tak~ lo ~tc vihmnt, photo*
~mote I~tiom when no m~u~r telq~hon~ ~alL~gc ~non ador. Nor do th~ in~udc thc
~ck is a~i~blc. Simply ~nn~ the ~upIcr lo' o~tion to ~an. in o)lor. ~c BJC-~ and BJC-
any phonc'~ ha~. ~ color Bubble Jc~TMprintc~ Iza~ it all
m ~trk~ on any ~y plmnc, disital (PBX) optional IS- 12 ~dor Inm~c ~anner
pitons, or a~io8 pIm~ ~n~s ~non ~rtabl~ into ~ dpi ogor
m ~m~l~dbic with all m~cm, (I~MCIA, ~t f~ ~annc~.
internal, ~tc~al, and ~,rtablc) · Built-in lri)A for cabk-k~ printing
~ ~mits data at Sl~S up to 28,8~ bps., m Wind~ 3.1 ~ Windo~ 95/9~ compmihlc
V.~ com~tihJc m Prints on I~tcr, k~l, A4, AS,
m U~ 9V ~ttc~ (includc~l) ~]0
Wo~ at a desk in your car - ~ ~
~pT~lcr p~id~ a mobilc computing d~k for - **"
hotelS, ~nabic fax machin~ and PDA's. i -
~"'~ ..... ~'/', '~,' ,r~n~mfort.Adjusts to hund~s of ~sitions to pmvide ,' ~~
'. . ~ ~ !- ~
~ ~ ~ I ~able ~1 wi~ ~ d~ m~tion ..,
. and ~ d~ ~i~l ~ . ' ' ~ ....
~ ~ · Uni~ No-D~I ~ mo~t ~-" ..... ~' -~ '-' ~" "~ ;~ -~
~ m Vebt~p for note~k ~ dur~g t~it Po~ble ~C~ ~lor Bubblu ~ ~r
m ~mpu-~ ~ng S~em. ~ ~i~ m The ~d ~or's uiti~te companion
f~tu~ ~ ~ nook dur~8 ~sit. m Li~i~ lon batte~ & uni~l
m Weighs approx. 6 lbs. (additional shipping a~pter ~dud~
~ ~ apply) m Qui~ d~top-c~ sp~
l~m ~ ~5~2, SZ~9 (Q~ ~), $~ (Q~ 5+) [ 11.8" (w) x 1.9' (H) x 4.4' (D), Only 2 lbs
~. H~ ~ry MedeJ hem ~: 32~8~, m Option~ auto--tic ~t f~er: 30 ~ee~
_ ~9 (Q~ ~), S24~ (Q~ 5+) 10 tra~a~ or 5 ~1o~
~.~.. .n;-;*a~ conference recorder with amaz;n-. ~ c~n.;~.....~ ~'~ ~ ~s~. s~s~ ~ ~. s~ss ~o~
~e ~n~nic RR-DR~ ~ a ~pdm d~i~ ~9(QWI), ~5 (~5+)
~. ~ ~ ' to ~ up m ~ ~u~ of ~d, ~d ~ up ~
~ ~:~ to ~ n~ ~ for ~ ~ ~d p~
File Num~ ~e~on, Phy, S~ ~d In~-~
~ .... ~ ', ~e Vo~ ~ 5~ ~ auto~ ~
~ ' ~ ~e ~nd it d~ a m~d. .
I ~u~ or ~ ph~a~ ~ up m ~ ~.~ ~
online ~a~o~
D~ ~ ~10r Bubble ~ ~mer
· Real ~me Suppo~ - If ~u n~ help or have que~ions regarding 0 · ~opq~i~whe~urd~k~'
iGoprodu~ or ~ic~, our real4ime merging ~n provide your ~ · BuUt-~sh~t f~,~ ~ 10
~ trans~n&~ or 5 en~o~
~l~ion. Simply click for real time m~ging assi~ance on our we~ite, ~ m ~tion~ NiMH baHe~ ~
and within minut~ an iGo repre~n~ti~ will answer your que~ion(s~
all while you are on-line. ~ m ll.8'(W)x6.2"(D)x2.2'(H),3.1lbd~ign
· Mobile Computing ~ - Our archive of mobile computing tips cover a Batt~ ltm e 25710,
vari~ of topi~ such as conne~ing to the Internet from hotels, travel ~9 (QW 1), ~5
do's and don't, note~k and cellular advice as well as other FA~'s. To
view iGo tips, log on to ~.iGoCorp.co~ips TODAY - they are sure to ~d~ lor Bd~ & ~
Bla~ i~ e J~5, S3~ (Qty ~ ), S37 (Qty 5+)
help you work sma~er, not harder ~lor i~ ~:
Win a S~,449 JVC DuafCam digital camcorder at www. iGoCorp.com/register .a7.
- SAGE GUNS
"Less-Lethal"
The Sage Gun is a "less-lethal" weapon, which allows law enforcement officers to
temporarily incapacitate a subject that is combative towards officers, or may be a danger
to others. The Sage Gun ~es a rubber projectile, which strikes the subject with enough
force to befuddle and shock the subject into submission. Often times a subject will
comply with officer's orders at the mere sight of this imposing weapon, thus saving
physical confrontation between officers and the suspect.
Costs: 6 Sage Guns $9,800.00
Sage S!-1
br Flil~b'p .4.pernture Sight
Ckek Pi~e
(bg. Technical Specifications
.action Tvl~e:
Break open, single shot.
Caliber:
1-~' (37mm).
Overall Len~h:
28" (70mm).
Barrel Len~h:
10.5" (26.25cm) five groove rifled.
Ammunition Tyoe:
All Sage Control Ordnance, Inc. or ARWEN'r- ~pes.
Wei.oht:
6.5 lbs. (2.9kg)..
- THE STOP STICK
The Stop Stick device is designed to penetrate and deflate the tire(s) of a moving
(dynamic) target vehicle in a manner that will avoid a catastrophic failure of the
penetrated tire(s); thus ensuring the safest possible means of reducing the mobility of the
tarset vehicle. The Stop Stick device is designed to be used on four-wheel vehicles only,
and to be deployed on paved (concrete or blacktop) surfaces only. The Stop Stick is
recommended for use at speeds over 25 MPH. The Stop Stick can be placed in any
orientation perpendicular to the path of an oncoming target vehicle.
The use of The Stop Stick will reduce the number of lengthy high-speed chases by
terminating the chase at an early stage; thus minimizing property damage, and potential
injuries to innocent victims.
Costs: 20 Stop Sticks $7,800.00
Social Advocates for Youth
The City of Cupertino has earmarked "COPS" monies to fund the Social Advocates for
Youth Program.
Costs: $7,500.00
PRELIMINARY ALCOHOL SCREENING DEVICE (Aico-Sensor IV)
Due to thc increased use of alcohol by juveniles at school and at social events, measures
must be taken to stress zero tolerance. Zero tolerance means zero blood alcohol
concenmtion (BAC) in anyone under the age of 21 years.
Several of the schools in Saratoga and Cupertino have approached the School Resource
Officers requesting assistance in 'identifying students who may be under the influence of
alcohol.
For the past two years ,the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office has been using the
preliminary alcohol screening devices to assist in making accurate assessments of persons
suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol. The use of the Preliminary Alcohol
Screening device'has been very successful because it gives immediate results.
The .Mc, o-Sensor IV is a hand held breath testing device designed to analyze blood
alcohol concentrations of breath samples. The device is used as a field sobriety test to
obtain a preliminary indication of a subject's blood alcohol concentration. Thc Alco-
Sensor IV is a reliable insm~ent capable of accuracy comparable to that of evidentiary
breath testing in-~xuments. The result of the analysis is automatically displayed first with
a two digit approximstion and moments later in three digits as a final _r~dinE.
The Preliminary Alcohol Screening devices will be kept at each junior high and high
school, available to school deans and to the deputies called to the schools. The devices
will also be used at after school activities such as school dances and sporting events. The
use of the devices will be at the discretion of the school officials but they are not intended
to be used on every student, only those suspected of being under the influence. As with
any investigative device, this method can remove suspicion from those Who have not
consumed alcohol as much as prove the suspicion of those who have.
The Preliminary Alcohol Screening devices will be checked for calibration regularly by
the deputy currently maintaining the devices for Westside Patrol Divisio~ h will be the
{esponsibility of the beat deputy to pick up the device from the school for calibration.
All deputies, who will be using the device,, will be ir'dined by the Westside Traffic
Investigator. The school deans, who will be using the Preliminary Alcohol Screening
device, will be trained by any beat deputy with prior training. There is no cost for this.
training.
Currently, there are not enough Preliminary Alcohol Screening Units available to all
officers assigned to the City of Cupertino. The goal is to ensure that each patrol unit is
equipped with a Preliminary Alcohol Screening Unit, and with the purchase of 8
additional units, this will help to accomplish this goal.
Costs: 8 Preliminary.Screening Device Units
5000 plastic mouth pieces
Total Costs: $6,500.00
#V
THE UNIT SAMPUNG REQUIREMENTS
The Aloo-Sensor IV is a hand-held breath alcohol tester. Sample Error Detection
it oilers e simple, accurate and economical method of The software monitored diagnostic~ystem requires
determining a subject's blood alcohol level, proper battery power, proper instrument temperature,
sucx:esstul instrument pretest blank and the cleliven/of
UNIQUE FEATURES a 'deep lung' breath specimen before automatically
The ASlV follows an automated, software driven test protocol, taking a sample.
Each function is displayed on an LED panel, which provides
the operator with step-by-step instructions foe tail-safe testing. Mouthpiece
The Aloo-Sensoe IV automatically samples deep lung breath The disposable one-way mouthpiece is individually
and displays results in a three-digit readout. The unit has wrapped and can be automatically ejected from the
semi-automated calibration and a mouthpiece release feature instrument to avoid personal contact.
which eliminates operator contact with a used mouthpiece.
ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS
ANALYTICAL Power Supply
Sensor 9 volt heavy duty alkali, ne battery
The fuel cell sensor generates a response that is
proporfJonal to the Breath Alcohol Concentration. Battery Capacity
The response is linear and requires one point 300+ tests per battery
calibration.
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Accuracy & Precision Size/Weight
U.S. DOT approved for evidential use. Meets and Hand-held, 11oz
exceeds the federal model specification for traffic
enforcement and Omnibus breath alcohol testing. Case Construction
ABS plastic
Specificity
The fuel cell sensor is sensitive to alcohol. It does MEMORY/COMMUNICATIONS
not respond to acetone or other substances which · Data Storage
are found in the breath. Last test recall function
Linear Range Display
The Nco-Sensor IV can accurately detect breath Four digit alpha-numeric LED display
alcohol levels between .000 - .400 BrAC.
Communications
Response Time The Al(x~Sensor IV can be oonnected to and run with
The instrument responds within 10 seconds on negative a pdnter microprocessor or a computer. (RS232 cable
samples and within 30 - 45 seconds on positive and optional software available through Intaximeters).
Sampling System There are several test protocols available which satisfy
The patented analytical system permits quick results, a variety of testing requirements.
mom positive tests per time period with no loss of
Calibration
Checks and calibrations should be performed with
either a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) approved wet bath simulator or a dry gas
standard.
Environmental
Operating temperature range is 0° - 104° F.
Intnxinaeter ln :.
1901 I_ocus~ S~[oo~ ffi S~. louis. Missouri 63103 ·
Fatal Vision Educational Goggles'
These unique goggles are geared towards substance abuse simulation, which provide an
extreme level of impairment causing double vision, loss of depth perception and
coordination.
The Fatal Vision goggles have proven to very effective for the educational .benefits to all
age levels. The goggles simulate the impairment that is assooiated with substance abuse,
allowing students to see first hand what the effects of substance abuse would be without
'actually having used any alcohol or drags.
Students put the goggles on and are instructed to walk a line, balance on one foot, play
catch, and pick up various Rems. Students quickly learn how impairment affects them
even trying to complete simple tasks.
The Fatal Vision Goggles are an excellent training aid that is used for substance abuse
awareness.
2 Fatal Vision 12 Pack
6 Blue Label Goggles
2 Line Detectors
Total .Costs $4,200.00
~'I~OTE: The Fatal Vision~Goggic (Silver) simulates a high level of impairment (est. BAC level of. 17 m .20). Thc rata&
Vision® Goggle (Bronze) simulates a moderate level of impairment (est. BAt: level of.08 to .10).
Fatal Vtslon® Starter JOt (FVI) - The Fatal Vision® Starter Kit includes 4 Fatal Vision~ goggles (1 Silver hbcl clear, !
Bronze label clear. I Silver label shaded, ! Bronze label shaded), a ONECLOTI-Fu cleaning cloth, 4 Fatal Vision® carr~,in~
bags, Yellow & Black "Walk-the-Line" Tape, lnsu'uctor's Guide, reproducible Student Handouts (Adult, Adolescent, and
Elementary versions), and 2 Instructional Videos. The Fatal Vision Carrying Case is available for purchase. See l~eiow*
I.'atal Vision® Goggle (gVn) - I Fatal Vision® goggle & cloth bag, reproducible student handouts and instructor's guide.
Fatal Vision® 2Pack (2PAC) = 2 Fatal Vision® goggles & cloth bags, reproducible student handouts and instructor's guide.
Fatal Vision® 6Pack (6PAC) - 6 Fatal Vision® goggles & cloth bags, reproducible student handouts and ins~uctor's guide.
Fatal Vision® 12Pack (12PAC) - 12 Fatal Vision® goggles & cloth hags, student handouts and instructor's guide.
Blue LabelTMGoggles(FVB) - The Blue LabelmGoggle provides an extreme level of impairment causing double vision, loss
of depth perception and coordination. The application of the Blue LabelTM Goggle is geared toward substance abuse
simulation. The Blue LabelTM Goggle comes in both the clear goggle and thc night goggle.
Fatal Vision®Training Materials OMA'F) = All materials you find in Starter Kit without the Fatal Vision® goggles.
Your ChoiceTM CD/Video (CHOICE) = Teens choose to drink and drive and bear the consequences - 28 minutes.
The Line DetectorTM (LD2) - The llne DetectorTM speaks a m~ge each time the participant steps off a straight 10 foot 1/4
inch vinyl line.giving hnmediate feedback m the participant. The line acts as a switch that triggers an audio message. The Line
DetectorTM consists of the 10' line and a speaker unit. You record your own multiple messages, up to a total 12 seconds (i.e.
"Don't Drink and Drive!" ). The Line DetectorTM unit includes the Fatal Vision® Carrying Case.
Safety and Prevention Education Computer Software Proprnms
NEW - StudentSafeTM School Safety Program (STUSF) - A CD and video based tntining program for safe schools.
NEW -- Crash matchTM (CRSH) - An interactive computer game to drive home the message not to drink and drive.
NEW -- Fatal ReflectionsTM (FRS) - Fatal ReflectionsTM is a software program that lets you dramatically demonsuate the
physical injuries sustained as a result of driving ' ,re?aired or driving without wearing a seat belt.
Security Devices
Weapons CheckTM Metal Detector (W~) - Lightweight, portable and ragged. Easily ~n_~_ken anywhere on campus.
Accessories
ONECLOTHTM is manufactured from a 85% Polyester 15% Nylon Microfiber non-abrasive weave that is environmentally
friendly. Use cl~ or damp with water only. A great cleaning cloth for keeping your Fatal Vision® goggles clean.
Yellow & Black Walk the Line Tape (TAPE) - This is a 25 foot roll of adhesive backed yellow and black striped tape.
*The Fatal Vision® Carrying Case (CASK) - This hard case will securely carry 4 Fatal Vision® goggles, all the Fatal
Vision® ~alning materials, and the Line DetectorTM.
SHIPPING CHART
Allow up to 2 weeks for delivery. Indicate in "Con~ncnts" section on fx-ont your need for faster delivery time.
Fatal Vision® Educational Materials Shipping Cost
Starter Kit, Single Go~gle, 2-Pack, 6-Paclc, 12-Pack, Case [ Add $10 per item I
Line Detector [ Add $25 per Line Detector
Software, Security and Accessories Items Shippinj~ Cost
Orders to $100 Add Sg
Orders 5101 to S200 Add $12
Orders over $200, Add 6.5% of order
Special Orders
Ovt~'night or Express (2-5 days) shipping Actual shipping will I~ charged
STEP ~ Ffll out Billing and Shipping Information:
Bill to: Ship to: ~l Check here if same as 'Bill to'
Name Name
Organization Organization
P,O. Address P.O. Address
Street Address Street Address
City State~ Zip City State~ Zip
Phone No. ( ) Phone No. ( )
STEP (~ Fill out the Order --indicate number of each goggle type you want
Item [ Qty. I Price (ea.) [ Total .-Silver ~Bronze
Fatal Vision® Educational Materials Clear Night Clear Night
*Fatal Vision® Sturt~r Kit (1~ l) S595
*Fatal Vision® Goggle (FVn) S149
Fatal Vision® 2 Pack (2PAC) $265
Fatal Vision® 6 Pack (6PAC) S695
Fatal Vision® '12 Pack (12PAC) ~. $1,195
*Blue Label~oggle(FVB) (o $86
*Fatal Vision® Training Materials (NLAT) $99
*Your ChoiceTM CDNideo (CHOICE) $99
*The Line DetectorTM (LD2) ~. $495
Safety and Prevention Educational CompUter Software Pro,rams
*StudentSafeTM School Safety Pgm (STUSF) $249
*Crash MairitTM (CRSH3
*Fatal ReflectionsTM (FRS) $99
Safety and Security Devices
*Weapons Check'*' Metal Detector C~CMD)
Ae__f~ss__ories
*The ONECLOTHTM Cleaning Cloth (CLTH) $15
*Yellow & Black Walk the Line Tape (TAPE) $12
*The Fatal Vision® Carrying Case (CASE) $75
Add Shipping &
· Handling (see Chart)
*Call for bulk purchase pricing TOTAL
STEP 3~ Select Method of Payment
C] Check (payable to Innocorp, Ltd., PO Box 930064, Verona, WI 53593-0064)
KI MC or VISA Card #: - - Exp: /
Name ns it appears on card:
~]Please bill me* - Net Due on Receipt of Invoice, COD's not accepted
{~Note: We must have your Tax Exempt Certificate # on file before we can grant tax free
status. Please send with order.
STEP ~(~ Place the Order By Doing One of the Following: 1) Call: (800)272-5023 Use Reference Code: CUST
2) Fax order form to: (608)848-5558 Or,
3) Mail order form to: (NOTE: Please enclose order form with purchase orders)
Dept: CUST
PO Box 930064
Verona, WI 53593-0064
- SAFE RESTRAINTS
"The Wrap"
"The Wrap" is a device designed by law enforcement, which is used to restrain the
movement of a violent or dangerous suspect in a safe and humane manner. Use of"The
Wrap" not only protects the suspected individual from injury to them, but also protects
the arresting and transporting officers from injuries that otherwise might be incurred in
physically fighting with the subject.
Costs: 10 "Wraps" $3,800.00
MAINTENANCE/REPAIR FUND
This fund will cover costs for the maintenance and repairs of the In-car video systems,
and for the radar guns assigned to the City of Cupertino.
Costs: $2,800.00
Public Dialogue Consortium
The Cupertino Community Project is a collaborative initiative by the Public Dialogue
Consortium, the City of Cupertino, DeAnza College, some civic organizations, and many
citizens of Cupertino. Its purpose is to improve the quality of life through enhancing the
quality of public communication among citizens and between citizens and government.
This community-based action project in which residents of Cupertino, working with the
City government and law enforcement officials, will explore possible ways of enhancing
public safety. The project will link residents across generations and cultural
backgrounds, providing training and facilitated meetings for the discussion of these
issues.
Total "COPS funds: $1,634.00
IN-CAR VIDEO SYSTEMS
Using previous "COPS" funds, all patrol vehicles assigned to the City of Cupertino were
outfitted with the "Eyewitness" In-car video system. The video system records the
actions of the violator, as well as the officer. The camera systems have proved to be
invaluable, as it helps reduce allegations of wrong doing against an officer, and reduces
lengthy court time by expediting quick convictions.
The patrol supervisor on a regular basis reviews the tapes of the officers assigned to his
shift. This allows the supervisor to monitor the actions of his/her patrol officers.
The West Valley Patrol Division needs a combination 19" VCR/TV. This would allow
the supervisor to review recorded tapes, and allow for the rewind of used tapes that will
be recycled into use.
Costs: 19" VCR/TV $500.00
~ (.'it} Ilall
1030(} 'I orrc Avenue
CITY 0[: Cupertino. CA 95014
CUPEI(TINO ,40,, 777.3212
Fax: (408) 777-3366
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ AGENDA DATE //"~-'~'
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Application for Alcoholic Beverage License.
BACKGROUND
1. Name of Business: Rags and Friends
Location: 19979 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Type of Business: Restaurant
Type of License: On-Sale General
Reason for Application: Person to Person Transfer
RECOMMENDATION
There are no use permit restrictions or zoning restrictions which would prohibit this use and staff
has no objection to the issuance of the license.
Prepared by: Submitt/~. b~
Cid Donald D. Brown, City Manager
G :planning/misc/abcragsandfricnds
Printecl on Rscy~lecl P~oer
State or' California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
^,cAPPLICATION_',, .,,,,,, FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ',.-.f .".."' .
File Number: 3597:}7
'-~ TO:. Department of Alcoholic Beverage
!0() I'aseo de San Antonio Receipt Number: 1255330
Geographical Code: 4303
Room 119 Copies Mailed Date: October 13, 1999
San J,)sc. CA 95113 Issued Date:
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: SAN .lOSE
Fir~l Owner: ALEJANDRE INC
Name ,)f Business: RAGS AND FRIENDS
Loc:trion of Business: 19979 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
.CUPERTINO, CA 95014
County: SANTA CLARA
Is premise inside city limits'? Yes
Maili,tg Address: 2447 MICHELE JEAN WY
(If different from SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
pre,aisc address)
Type or' license(s): 47
Transl'eror's license/name: 323329 / PAUPERS LLC Dropping Partner: Yes.__ No
l.icensc Type Transaction Ty0e Fcc Type Master ~ Date Fee
47 ON-SALE GENERAL ] PERSON TO PERSON TRANSI: P40 Y 0 1011 3199 $1,250.00
¢7 ON-SALE GENERAL l ANNUAL FEE P40 Y 0 10113/9 9 $695.00
47 ON-SALE GENERAL I STATE FINGERPRINTS NA N 2 1011 3199 $78.00
Total $2,023.00
Haxc vtm ever been convicted of a felony': No
Ha~c you ever violated any provisions of thc Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the
Deparlment pertaining to the Act'? No
Expl:mt .my "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachmetn which shall be deemed pa~t of this application.
Applic=,nt agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the
qu;tlifications of a licensee, and (b) that hc will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the
provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SANTA CLARA Date: October 13, 1999
Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature apl)ca,'s below, certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an
execmi~c -fficer of the applicant corporation, named in thc t'orcgoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that
he h;,, toad the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and tirol each of the above statements therein mIKIc age tam; (3) that no person other
than ,he applicant or applicants has any di~ct or indirect itJtere.qt in the applicant or applicant's hosillees to ho conducted under the liccnse(s) for
which tht~ application is made; (4) that the transfer applicamm or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an
agrccmcm entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding iht day on which the transfer application is filed with the Dopnrtment or to rain or
estttbh,h a preference to or for any creditor or transferor ,,t it, defraud or injure any creditor of transferor. ($) that the transfer application may
be x~tthdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee will, m, resulting liability to the Dopertmant.
APl~liczmt Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) n'~""'.~L~
ALI'3ANDRE INC ~'~ ~' ~'~e~ ~"3~.0 T, n
~ City Hall
10300 Torrc Avenue
CITY OF Cupertino. CA 95¢)14
I~TINO (408) 777-3212
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ~ 1~ AGENDA DATE/I- I~-?f"
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Application for Alcoholic Beverage License.
BACKGROUND
1. Name of Business: Green .Valley Liquors
Location: 10073 Saich Way
Type of Business: . Liquor Store
Type of License: Off-Sale General
Reason for Application: Person to Person Transfer
RECOMMENDATION
There are no use permit restrictions or zoning restrictions which would prohibit this use and staff
has no objection to the issuance of the license.
Prepared by: Submitted/b~: ,
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Donal~D.\Brown, City Manager
G:planning/misdabcgrccn valley
Printed on Recycled Paper
State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
ABC 211 ~6/99)
TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number: 360133
100 Pasco de San Antonio Receipt Number: 1256971
Room 119 Geographical Code: 4303
San Jose. CA 95113 Copies Mailed Date: October 26, 1999
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: SAN JaSik.
First Owner: PATEL BHARAT RAMANBHAI
Name of Business: GREEN VALLEY LIQUORS
Location of Business: 10073 SAICH WY
CUPERTINO, CA 9S014
County: SANTA CLARA
Is premise inside city limits?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premise address)
Type. of license(s): 21
Transferor's license/name: 337858 /NGUYEN LANI BI Dropping Partner: Yes~ No
l.icense Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master ~ Date Fee
21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANSF NA Y 0 ! 012 6 / 9 9 $1,274.00
21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ANNUALFI/I/ NA Y 0 10/26199 $446.00
21 OFF-SALE GENERAL STATI/FINGERPRINTS NA N I 1012 619 9 $39.00
Total $1,759.00
Have you ever been convicted of a felony.'? No
Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the
Department pertaining to the Act? No
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pan of this application.
Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the
qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the
provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SANTA CLARA Date: October 26, 1999
Under penalty of perjury, each per, on whose signature appears below, cmifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an
executive officer of the applicant coFporation, tmmed in the foresoius application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: (2) that
he hes reed the foregoing and knows the contants thereof and ~lut em:h of the above statements therein made am true: (3) that no parian other
than the applicant or applicants has any diract or indirect in,rest in the applicant or applicant's .business to be conducted under the license(s) for
which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not mede to satisfy the payment of a iomn or to fulfill an
armament entered into more than ninety (90) days precedins the day on which the transfer' application is filed with the Depenment or to sain or
establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor;, (5) that the transfer application may
be withdrawn by citber the applicant or the licensee with no resuitins liability to the Department.
Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s)
PATEL BHA._R~._T RAMANBHAI ~{'~'// ~'U~ ~r'~l'~ ~ 'xP~'%
,,.,, ~,,,.,. I---~-~'. ~,-r,-~-~..,..,,~,:. 'i . -,...,~--.!
· .=,~:...~,.,,.~:,,.~., /. -,~-- ~,,,-~,_~,,..-
.- - ,., ', .. '.,~-.: ~ : ,.~ ...
__-.- : . : ~' ........... ': : ..... ,., ,.. '--..--,"~--' ,, ,,,. ~ .... ~ ./'%__
-
· · ,( . "~ ~ _h.. , ,.,,~ ..,~ ," ·
; '' "'d'"'t '"" "- '. .... J "' I
"°'' I "' I
P.M. : --
,~-
.,.....,.. .... ,o....
· ::;.... ~CL. ·
· : ~ '~ .J
·-
I
I :"' I ~ ,,
....
-.~.
's STEVEN.~ CRE:EK ( .... .,,,~.. ,~Jcc,~ ,~,~,) .j BLVD.'
,, (~)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-334
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES FROM
DIANA WONG, TRUSTEE OF C.I.W. TRUST, 10067 BIANCHI WAY,
APN 359-07-009
WHEREAS, Diana Wong, Trustee of C.I.W.: Trust has executed a Grant of
Easement for Roadway Purposes which is in good and sufficient form, granting to the
City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, easement over certain real
property for roadway purposes, situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which
is as follows:
All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of
Santa Clara, State of California, located at 10067 Bianchi Way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino accept said
_ grant so tendered; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record
said grant and this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15~ day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members o__f the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES
APN 359-07=009
10067 Bianchi Way
Diana Wong, Trustee of C.I.W. Trust, grant(s) to the CITY OF CUPERTINO for public
roadway purposes, together with the right to construct, repair, operate, and maintain any and all
public utilities and improvements which shall be or become necessary for preservation of the
public safety, welfar~ or convenience, the hereina~er described property which is situated in the
City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, and as described as follows:
(See Exhibit "A" & "B")
WITNESS WHEREOF, executed this~O day of ~c~ , 199 c~ .
C.I.W. Trust
Diana°Wong, Trustee
(Notary acknowledgment to be attached)
"EXHIBIT A"
PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
SEPTEMBER, 1999
All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, more
particularly described as follows;
Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of that certain 30 feet strip of land described in the
Deed from So.uthem Pacific Company to County of Santa Clara, dated April 5, 1937 and
recorded December 7, 1937 in book 853 Official Records, page 248 Santa Clara County
Records, distant thereon North 89 deg. 57 ' East 20.00 feet from Westerly line of that certain
parcel of land described in the Deed from Bank of American to Peter Bianchi, dated April l 0,
and record April 28, 1941 in Book 1038 Official Records, Page 156, Santa Clara County Record,
said point of be~rming also being in the center line of 40 feet right of way, hereinafter described;
running thence South along the center line of said 40 foot right of way and parallel with the
Easterly line of Stelling Road 297.26 feet to the true point of beginning of the description;
Thence leaving said true point of beginning and running South 00 deg. 03 ' 41 "East and parallel
with the said Easterly line of Stelling Road, also the Easterly boundary line, 9.29 feet;
Thence on a curve to the right, w/th a radius of 35 feet, through a central angle of 32 deg. 52 ' 42 ",
for a distance of 20.08 feet:
Thence running with the Northerly boundary line North 89 deg. 57 ' East 17.49 feet to the true
Point of BeEinn!ng.
Containing:100 square feet, more or less.
0.0023 acres, more or less
A. P. N.: 359 - 07 - 09
~ "~ 25538
N
' ~' EXHllSIT
_ ~: 25538
~F~
LI~E
~ ---- FROFER~ LINE ~Y: 4~ F~V:
' ~o. ~' 2o5o2i ~.J~,~
.- RESOLUTION NO. 99-335
A RESOLUTION OF TKE C1TY COUNCrI'. OF THE CITY OF CUPERT]2qO
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPERS BEN SHYY AND MONICA H. SUN,
19028 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD, APN 37:5-11-071
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed improvement
agreement between the City of Cupertino and developers, Ben Shyy and Monica H. Sun, for the
installation of certain municipal improvements at 19028 Stevens Creek Boulevard and said
agreement having been approved by the City Attorney, and Developers having paid the fees as
outlined in the attached Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mayor and the City Clerk are
hereby authorized to sign the aforementioned agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 'City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15~ day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
'- Vote Members o._fthe City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
Resolution No. 99-335
Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF BOND, FEES, AND DEPOSITS
DEVELOPMENT: Retail Building 8: Three Residential Units
Ben Shyy and Monica H. Sun
LOCATION: 19028 Stevens Creek Boulevard
A. Faithful Performance Bond: Off-site: $ 98,000.00
On-site: $ 60,000.00
NINETY-EIGHT THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
B. Labor and Material Bond: $ 98,000.00
NINETY-EIGHT THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
C. Checking and Inspection Fees: $ 5,880.00
FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS
D. Indirect City Expenses: N/A
E. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 3,000.00
THREE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
F. Storm Drainage Fee: Basin #3 $ 1,042.00
ONE THOUSAND FORTY-TWO AND 00/100 DOLLARS
G. One Year Power Cost: $ 225.00
TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS
II. Street Trees: By Developer
I. Map Checking Fee: N/A
J. Park Fee: $27,000.00
TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
K. Water Main Reimbursement: N/A
L. Maps and/or Improvement Plans: As specified in
Item #23 of agreement
- RESOLUTION NO. 99-336
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPERS XUAN NGOC NGUYEN AND
NGUYET-LAN THI VU, 22056 WALLACE DRIVE, APN 326-03-041
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed improvement
agreement between the City of Cupertino and developers, Xuan Ngoc Nguyen and Nguyet-Lan
Thi Vu, for the installation of certain municipal improvements at 22056 Wallace Drive and said
agreement having been approved by the City Attorney, and Developers having paid the fees as
outlined in the attached Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mayor and the City Clerk are
hereby authorized to sign the aforementioned agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15~' day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members o__f the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
Resolution No. 99-336
Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF BOND, FEES, AND DEPOSITS
DEVELOPMENT: Single Family Homes
Xuan Ngoc Nguyen and Nguyet-Lan Thi Vu
LOCATION: 22056 Wallace Drive
A. Faithful Performance Bond: Off-site: $ 7,000.00
On-site: $1,400.00
SEVEN THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
B. Labor and Material Bond: $ 7,000.00
SEVEN THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
C. Checking and Inspection Fees: $1,975.00
ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY=FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS
D. Indirect City Expenses: N/A
E. Development Maintenance Deposit: $1,000.00
ONE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
F. Storm Drainage Fee: Basin #3 $ 278.00
TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-EIGHT AND 00/100 DOLLARS
G. One Year Power Cost: $ 75.00
SEVENTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS
H. Street Trees: By Developer
I. Map Checking Fee: N/A
J. Park Fee: N/A
K. Water Main Reimbursement: N/A
L. Maps and/or Improvement Plans: As specified in
Item #23 of agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 99-337
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPER DIANA WONG, TRUSTEE OF C.I.W.
TRUST, 10067 BIANCHI WAY, APN 359-07-009
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed improvement
agreement between the City of Cupertino and developer, Diana Won§, Trustee of C.I.W. Trust,
for the installation of certain municipal improvements at 10067 Bianchi Way and said agreement
having been approved by the City Attorney, and Developer having paid the fees as outlined in
the attached Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFOKE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mayor and the City Clerk are
hereby authorized to sign the aforementioned agreement on behalf of' the City of Cupertino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City 'of
Cupertino this 15e day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members o__fthe City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
Resolution No. 99-337
Page 2 ·
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF BOND, FEES, AND DEPOSITS
DEVELOPMENT: Sin[lie Family. Homes
Diana Won[l, Trustee of C.I.W. Trust
LOCATION: 10067 Bianchi Way
A. Faithful Performance Bond: Off-site: $ 2,500.00
On-site: $ 2,000.00
TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS
B. Labor and Material Bond: $ 2,500.00
TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS
C. Checking and Inspection Fees: $1,515.00
ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTEEN AND 00/100 DOLLARS
D. Indirect City Expenses: N/A
E. Development Maintenance Deposit: $1,000.00
ONE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
F. Storm Drainage Fee: Basin #3 $ 362.00
THKEE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO AND 00/100 DOLLARS
G. One Year Power Cost: $ 75.00
SEVENTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS
H. Street Trees: By Developer
I. Map Checking Fee: N/A
J. Park Fee: . $31,500.00
THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS
K. Water Main Reimbursement: N/A
L. Maps and/or Improvement Plans: As specified in
Item #23 of agreement
Roadway Easement vacation: $44,632. O0
RESOLUTION NO. 99-338
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCEPTING QUITCLAIM DEED AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS FROM XUAN NGOC NGUYEN AND
NGUYET-LAN TI-II VU, 22056 WALLACE DRIVE, APN 326-03-041
WHEREAS, Xuan Ngoc Nguyen and Nguyet-Lan Thi Vu have executed a
"Quitclaim Deed and Authorization", which is in good and sufficient form, quitclaiming
all their fights in and authorizing the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of
California, to extract water from the underground basin, underlying that certain real
property situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly described as follows:
All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of
Santa Clara, State of California, as shown and delineated on that certain
map filed in the Office of County Recorder of the County of Santa Clara
on the 9th day of April, 1951, in Book 33 P of Maps at Pages 16 and 17,
Lot 29, Block 2, Tract No. 801.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Cupertino accept said
"Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" so tendered; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record
said "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" and this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15~ day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
QUITCLAIM DEED AND AUTHORIZATION
FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS
APN 326-03-041
22056 Wallace Drive
Xuan Naoc NRuyen and N~uyet-Lan Thi Vu, hereinafter referred to as the
"GRANTOR", this ,,~7~ day of ~ , 19 ~', hereby grant, bargain, assign,
convey, remise, release and forever quitclaim unto the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "GRANTEE", its successors and
assigns, all the right, rifle, interest, estate, claim and demand, both at law and in equity,
and as well in possession as in expectancy of the GRANTOR. as owner of Lot 29, Block
2 Tract No. 801, of that certain subdivision of real property situate in the Codntry of
Santa Clara, State of California, and specifically described in the map thereof filed in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of Santa Clara on the 9th day of April,
1951 in Books 33 of Maps at Pa~es 16 & 17, to pump, take or otherwise extract water
from the underground basin or any underground swam in the Santa Clara Valley for
beneficial use upon the lands overlying said underground basin, and GRANTOR hereby
· irrevocably 'authorized GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, on behalf of the
GRANTOR and its successors in ownership or overlying lands in the said lots to take
from said underground basin within the said lots any and all water which the owner or
owners of said overlying lands may be entitled to take for beneficial use on said lands and
to supply such water to such owner or owners or others as a public utility; provided,
however, that nothing contained in this instntment shall be deemed to authorize
GRANTEE to enter upon any of the lots delineated upon the above described map or to
authorize G~ to wake any withdrawal of water which will result in damage to
any building or structure erected upon said lots.
Page I of 2
This assignment, conveyance and authorization is made for the benefit of Lot 29,
Block 2 Tract No. 801, within the abo~e described subdivision and shall bind the owner
of said lots within said subdivision.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has executed this insmunent the day and
year first above written.
(Acknowledgement and Notarial Seal AttachecO
Page 2 of 2
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CALIFORNIA
State of
county ofA LA MEDA
LONG HUYNH, NOTARY PUBLIC
On O~.~.~ ) \C~C~C~ beforeme,. ,
__ Na~e and TWa of Officer (e.g., 'Jane Doe. Notify Publk=']
personally appeared ~.~, _'~O~ ~~~ ~,s~~t~-LE.A~ "T~ Vvk ,
[] personally known to me - OR -.~proved to me on the basis of. satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s~i~'are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknow{edged to me that J~sf,~/they executed the
same in ~their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
.~ ..~~,~~ ~their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
.... ,~,~~,~. ?'_~ ~_'~, executed the instrument.
~-~"'.~'~ W31~_te,~'.~.'~ WITNE~:S my hand a~d 3fficial seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachrnent of this fonw to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: ~[ ~".~{~i1~ ~{~ ~ ~[~0%. ,,~'
Document Date: I O- ~"~'- _ ~{~l~t~ Number of Pages: ~.~.~ /"~"'r' -
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Signer's Name:
[] Individual [] Individual
· [] Corporate Officer [] Corporate Officer
Title(s): Title(s):
[] Partner- [] Limited [] General [] Partner- [] Limited [] General
[] Attomey-in-Fact [] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee [] Trustee
or Conservator [] Guardian or Conservator
[]
Guardian
[] Other:. T® of thumb ~re [] Other: Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing:
o 10~5 NMional Nm~y AJeOdllJen · 82~6 FlemmelAve., P.O. Box 7184 · Canogl Prate, CA g1300.7184 Plod. NO. 5~07 ~ C4# TMI-FMe 1-800-87~-~827
City H~ll
10300 Torre Avenue
~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3354
[~ilv ()l' FAX (408) 777-3333
Cupertino
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Summary
AGENDA ITEM / ~" + I '~ AGENDA DATE November 15, 1999
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Approval of the revised Memorandum of Agreement for the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution
Prevention Program, and resolution to reapply for reissuance of the City of Cupertino's Municipal Storm Water
NPDES Permit.
BACKGROUND
In April 1990, the City Council approved Resolution No. 8076 authorizing Cupertino to enter into an Agreement
providing for the Implementation of the Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program
(Agreement). This Agreement joined Cupertino, twelve other cities in Santa Clara County, Santa Clara County
and the Santa Clara Valley Water District (District) together as "Co-permittees." The Agreement allowed these
entities to .jointly apply for, and implement, their National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
storm water permits and oUtlined area-wide programs including cohesive program planning, water quality
monitoring, and outreach and education programs. In August 1995, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water
Quality Control Board (Regional Board) re-issued the Co-permittees' NPDES permit for municipal storm water
discharges, in the second round of permits under the 1987 Clean Water Act Amendments. The Program is
currently preparing to apply for its third NPDES permit to be submitted in December. Under this permit, the
Co-permittees will continue to implement and annually evaluate and improve their Urban Runoff Plans, while
participating jointly in activities that are most efficiently implemented region-wide.
The revised MOA was developed to implement the following goals:
1. Ensure the continued systematic and orderly compliance with permit requirements.
2. Increase Program performance and promote efficiency by providing an opportunity to contract out
administrative tasks where costs could be reduced.
3. Allow cost-share savings to be redirected into local program implementation.
The Santa Clara Valley Water District's (District) resignation as program administrator in 1997 resulted in
additional revisions to the MOA to clarify the role and oversight of the current Program Managers, EOA, Inc.,
and the District's role as contracting agent and fiscal agent. There are no cost implications associated with
approval of the Memorandum of Agreement. Costs associated with the Program were presented to City Council
in July as part of the annual Engineer's Assessment of Fees Report.
City Council approval of the revised MOA would continue Cupertino's participation as a Co-permittee and
provide for orderly and systematic compliance with the ama-wide provisions of the NPDES permit for storm
water discharges.
Printecl on Rc~c~t,~ Pa~r
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99-~ 5~, authorizing the Mayor to sign the
revised Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on behalf of the City and adopt Resolution No. 99-~ff0, to
reapply for reissuance of the city's storm water NPDES permit. Approval of this MOA would continue
Cupertino's participation in the Program for the purpose of complying with Cupertino's Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System NPDES permit requirements, pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act.
Do:I~D.
irector of Pu -!ic Works City Manager
i. /tl 3- 2..
RESOLUTION 99-339
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE REVISED
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO PROVIDING FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY URBAN RUNOFF
POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Agreement providing for implementation of the Santa
Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program between the Santa Clara Valley Water
District and the City of Cupertino has been revised; and
WHEREAS, the revised Memorandum of Agreement was developed to ensure the
continued systematic and orderly compliance with permit requirements, increase Program
performance and promote efficiency, and allow cost-share savings to be redirected into local
program implementation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cupertino
hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute Memorandum of Agreement on behalf of the City of
Cupertino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15~ day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members o__f the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
RESOLUTION 99-340
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO TO REAPPLY
FOR REISSUANCE OF ITS MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT
WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Pwtecfion Agency, under amendments to the 1987
Federal Clean Water Act, imposed regulations that mandate local governments reduce to the
maximum extent practicable that amount of pollutants in storm water discharged from municipal
storm drain conveyance systems, and;
WHEREAS, under authority of California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the
State Water Resources Control Board and its Regional Boards have been delegated the authority
to adopt NPDES permits and waste discharge requirements for municipal stormwater discharges,
and;
WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board's Water
Quality Control Plan specifically requires that all municipalities in Santa Clara County that
discharge storm water to San Francisco Bay and the Santa Clara Valley Water District (District)
have municipal storm water NPDES permit coverage and;
WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted an
NPDES permit (CAS029718), Order No. 95-180, on August 23,1995 for the municipalities in
Santa Clara County and the District, as described above, and;
WHEREAS, the adopted NPDES permit requires that the municipalities in Santa Clara
County and the District reapply for reissuance of their municipal stormwater NPDES permit by
December 21, 1999, and;
WHEREAS, the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program's
(SCVURPPP) Management Committee has compiled the necessary information and prepared the
application package for N-PDES reissuance, and;
.WHEREAS, the permit application represents mainly a continuation of the storm water
pollution prevention and control activities that are currently being implemented and associated
costs.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino
that:
1. The City of Cupertino hereby agrees to re. apply to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water
Quality Control Board for reissuance of its municipal storm water N-PDES permit; and
Resolution No. 99-340
2. The City of Cupcrtino commits to implement it's Urban Runoff Management Plan and the
area-wide components of the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
(SCVURPPP) Urban Runoff Management Plan and requests that the SCVURPPP's Manager
sign and submit the NPDES Permit Application Package to the San Francisco Bay Regional
Water Quality Control Board as part of the reapplication for NPDES permit reissuance, and
3. The City of Cupertino Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the
SCVURPPP's Manager.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15~h day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
.~ L 1,,. ~m~,~ City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
ClX/OF Cupertino. CA 95014-3255
CU PEKIINO Telephone: (408)77%3213
F~,Y' (408) 7'~7.3109
HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. [~ ' Meeting Date: November 15,.1999
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Resolution of Intention to Amend the Contract with the California Public Employees'
Retirement System
BACKGROUND
The City of Cupertino does not belong to the Social Security System. As a result, dependents of
employees do not have social security survivor benefits. The California Public Employees'
Retirement System (CalPers) provides an optional benefit making survivor benefits available to
eligible dependents. City of Cupertino employees have expressed an interest in obtaining the
benefit which is officially referred to as the "1959 Survivor Benefit."
The 1959 Survivor Benefit does not result in an employer cost. There is a $2.00 monthly cost to
employees. Prior to employees making an individual election as to obtaining the benefit, the
attached Resolution of Intention must be adopted by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no cost to the City of Cupertino.
Sub.~l, nitted,I'~~ ~y: App?; /bY :/ro~~
W,... ara oska Donald D.
Huma: Res6urces Manager City Manager
Pr~ntecl on Re~y~leel Patter
RESOLUTION NO. 99-34]
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO PROVIDING NOTICE OF AN INTENT TO APPROVE AN
AMENDMENT TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
WHEREAS, THE Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the
participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees'
Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure
by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their
employees to amendments to said Law; and
WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is
the adoption by the governing, body of the public agency of a resolution giving
notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which
resolution shall contain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and
WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change:
To provide Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits)
for local miscellaneous members only.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Cupertino does hereby give notice of intention to approve an amendment to
the contract between the City of Cupertino and the Board of Administration of the
Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being
attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a part hereof.
VOTE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
CalPERS
EXHIBIT
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Cupertino
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter
referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred
to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective August 16, 1967, and witnessed
July 10, 1967, and as amended effective June 1, 1973, March 1, 1974, December 22, 1976,
December 18, 1978, June 17, 1981, December. 30, 1981, September 19, 1991 and January
7, 1993 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public
Agency hereby agree as follows:
A. Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective
January 7, 1993, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1
through 13 inclusive:
1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees'
Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise
specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local
miscellaneous members and age 55 for local safety members.
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System
from and after August 16, 1967 making its employees as hereinafter provided,
members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees'
Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency
and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter
enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the
election of a contracting agency.
"~.t,. '~',',',,. L~ ,~ , I"Ar'il~')l ! ''';; '
3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of
said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law
or this agreement:
a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members);
b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members);
c. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local
miscellaneous members).
4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said
Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members
of said Retirement System:
NO ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS
5. After March 1, 1974 and prior to January 1, 1975, those members who were
hired by Public Agency on a temporary and/or seasonal basis not to exceed 6
months were excluded from PERS membership by contract. Government Code
Section 20336 superseded this contract provision by providing that any such
temporary and/or seasonal employees are excluded from PERS membership
subsequent to January 1, 1975. Legislation repealed and replaced said Section
with Government Code Section 20305 effective July 1, 1975.
6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for local miscellaneous
members for each year of credited prior and current service shall be determined
in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law, subject to the
reduction provided therein for service pdor to December 31, 1981, termination
of Social Security, for members whose service has been included in Federal
Social Secudty (2% at age 55 Full and Modified).
7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited
prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in
accordance with Section 21366 of said Retirement Law subject to the reduction
provided therein for Federal Social Security (One-half pay at age 55 Modified).
8. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 21222.1 (Special 5% Increase-1970) for local miscellaneous
members only. Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1,
1980.
b. Section 20965 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave) for local miscellaneous
members only.
PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT
_ c. Section 20614, Statutes of 1978, (Reduction of Normal Member
Contribution Rate). From December 18, 1978 and until June 17, 1981,
the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate shall be
3.500%. Legislation repealed said Section effective September 29,
1980.
d. Section 20690, Statutes of 1980, (To Prospectively Revoke Section
20614, Statutes of 1978), for local miscellaneous members only.
e. Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation) for local miscellaneous
members only.
f. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of
1976 for local miscellaneous members only.
g. Section 21573 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local
miscellaneous members only.
9. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790, ceased to
be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on December 22,
1976. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be fixed and
determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and accumulated
_. contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as provided in Government
· Code Section 20834.
10. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said
Retirement System.
11. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21573 of said Retirement Law.
(Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public
Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on
term insurance rates, for survivors of all local miscellaneous members.
b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment
within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said
System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the
costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations
required by law.
.-- c. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment
as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on
account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic
investigation and valuations required by law.
iq~ '
12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to
adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees'
Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement
System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by
said Retirement Law.
13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid'by
Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the
period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board
regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for
any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent
remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any
employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the
Board.
B. This amendment shall be effective on the day of .19.
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
CITY
COUNCIL
CITY OF CUPERTINO
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT~t~STEM
C~ii!~'~~<~'~ BY
I~NNETH W. MAR. ZION, PRESIDING OFFICER,~<~,,~'
ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYE[~ERVICES DIVISION ,<
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' .I.I~'FIREMENT SYSTEM
<~,¥~,,%<C; Witness ~''~'''~:¢'~
Attest:
Clerk
AMENDMENT
PERS-CON-702A (Rev. 8~96)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-342
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR RECEIVING ARGUMENTS AND REBUTTALS
RELATED TO THE LIBRARY BALLOT MEASURE IN MARCH 2000.
WHEREAS, the City Council of thc City of Cupertino adopted Resolution No.
99-308 (amended) calling a special election in March, 2000, for an advisory measure
related to thc construction of a new library;
WHEREAS, that resolution set forth deadlines for thc receipt of arguments and
rebuttals related to the measure;
WHEREAS, additional time is necessary to allow thc publication of thc notice of
election and deadlines;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that thc City Council of thc City of
Cupertino (1) Extends the deadline for arguments to Monday, Nov. 22, at 5:00 p.m.; (2)
Extends the deadline for rebuttals to Wednesday, Dec. 1, at 5:00 p.m.; and (3) Directs the
City Clerk to publish these deadlines in thc Cupertino Courier on November 17, 1999.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 15th day of November, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members o_._fthc City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
Ciw Hall
_ 10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino. CA 95014-3255
CITY O[ Telephone: (408) 777-3223
FAX: (408) 777-3366
CUPEILTINO kimberlys@cupertino.org
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. / {7 Meeting Date: November 15, 1999
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Review of recommendations by the Fine Arts Commission for the fall 1999 fine arts grants.
BACKGROUND
Twice each year the Fine Arts Commission solicits grant proposals from artists and reviews
._. those applications for cultural projects that provide a direct benefit to the citizens of Cupertino.
A total of $12,000 was available for grants for fiscal year 1999-2000.
By September 1999, $6,000.00 had been awarded to The Euphrat Museum of Art for their
programs, including Family Day 2000.
The Fine Arts Commission received six requests for grants totaling $10,525.00. The commission
recommends the following awards:
· $2,000 for the 1999 Cherry Blossom Festival
· $1,200 for the California Youth Symphony. These funds will cover expenditures associated
with underwriting the senior outreach program for 600 tickets for the 48* season of the
California Youth Symphony.
· $975 (including receomrnendation to waive the Parks and Recreation fee) for the Bay Area
Showcase Chorus. These funds will go towards a free barbershop harmony concert at the
Cupertino community center.
Prinlec~ on ~ Paper
April 5, 1999 Fine Arts Grants Page 2
· $600 for the Cupertino Symphonic Band. These funds will go towards the presentation of a
concert at the Quinlan Community Center commemorating the best music of the past century.
The target audience is the military veterans of Santa Clara County, as well as those with
limited access to such events because of physical disability or financial hardship.
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council approve the Fine Arts Commission's recommendations for the award of funds
totaling $4,775.00
Submitted by: Approved for submission:
City Ma-roger
96 report to council
City Hall
--' 10300 Torte Avenue
Cupextino, CA 95014-3255
CITY OF Telephone: (408) 777-3220
CUPEI INO (408)777-3109
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. Meeting Date: November 15, 1999
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Public hearing on the 1999-00 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds.
BACKGROUND
The City of Cupertino has received $25,529 in Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
funds for the Fiscal Year 1999-00. Such funds were made available through the Bureau
of Justice Assistance for the purposes of reducing crime and improving public safety.
The grant requires a local match of 10%, or $2,837.
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds are restricted to specific types of program
expenditures. The City requested funds for the purpose of establishing crime prevention
programs involving cooperation between community residents and law enforcement
personnel to control, detect, or investigate crime or the prosecution of criminals. In prior
years, these funds have been used for the Public Dialogue Consortium (PDC) Projects.
These are community-based action projects in which residents of Cupertino, working
with the City government and law enforcement officials, explored possible ways of
enhancing public safety. The PDC links residents across generations and cultural
backgrounds, provides training and facilitates meetings for the discussion of these issues.
In addition, a small amount of the funding has been used to provide family counseling for
"at-risk" kids.
This year's allocation will be utilized to provide community outreach and neighborhood
training. In conjunction with specific programs developed by our new Community
Outreach Coordinator and our Sergeant position, the PDC will continue to meet with
students and citizens via Town Hall meetings and group sessions on community safety.
As part of the grant requirements, au advisory board was established to review the
application and make recommendations to the City for the use of funds received under the
program. The board includes representatives from law enforcement, the court system, the
public school system and local nonprofit groups active in crime prevention. This group
has concurred with the project.
Printecl on Flecycted Paper
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council receive public comments on the proposed use of
1999-00 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds.
Submitted by: Approved for submission:
Carol A. Atwood Donald D. Brown
Director of Administrative Services City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 99-345
---' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO ORDERING ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
AT 18781 TUGGLE AVENUE
RECITALS:
(a) On October 18, 1999, the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopted
its Resolution No. 99-306, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof by
reference;
Co) Pursuant thereto, the City Council of the City of Cupertino held a hearing
with respect thereto, on December 6, 1999, at 6:45 p.m., in the Council Chambers, in the
City Hall, located at 10300 Torte Avenue;
(c) The following members of the City Council were present: BurneR, Chang,
James, Statton, Dean;
(d) The following members of the City's staff, among others, were present:
1. Director of Administrative, Services Carol Atwood
_ 2. City Clerk, Kimberly Smith
3. City Attorney, Charles Kilian
(e) The following interested persons were also present:
(f) After hearing opening remarks, the City Council heard and considered all
relevant evidence including, but not limited to, testimony under oath from owners,
witnesses and parties interested, as well as received into evidence exhibits and staff
reports, relative to said matter,
(g) Following the presentation of all evidence and closing remarks, the City
Council considered the matter, and resolved as follows:
1. The following findings of fact are hereby made:
(a) Notice of the time and place of the hearing to abate, and Resolution No.
99-306 were duly and regularly posted and served, as required by the provisions of
Ordinance No. ?94 of the City of Cupertino, enacted on April 18, 1977.
Resolution No. 99-307 Page 2
(b) The overgrown high weeds in the front and side yards, creating a possible
fire hazard and health on parcel 375-27-025, located at 18781 Tuggle Avenue, in the
City of Cupertino, State of California, constitute a public nuisance, in that said weeds
constitutes a hazard to public health, safety and general welfare, by reason of threatening
the free use and enjoyment of adjoining property.
2. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
(a) Said public nuisance shall be abated.
(b) A description of the needed corrections and/or repairs, necessary to
comply with the abatement order is as follows:
· Removal of overgrown weeds in the front and side yards, creating a.possible fire
hazard and health hazard at 18781 Tuggle Avenue, by December 20, 1999.
(c) Any property owner shall have the right to have the Public nuisance, as
declared, abated, provided the same is completed as per Item 2(b) of this Resolution,
which time, upon good cause shown, may be extended for a reasonable time by the City
Council.
(d) If such public nuisance is not abated within such time or any extension of
time, which may be granted, the Director of Administrative Services shall, by City forces
or private con~'act, cause the same to be abated.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 6th day of December, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
2 lq-'
- RESOLUTION NO. 99-306
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO DECLARING INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC
HEARING CONCERNING A NUISANCE ON PARCEL
375-27-025, 18781 TUGGLE AVENUE, OVERGROWN WEEDS
IN THE FRONT AND SIDE YARDS
WHEREAS, Section 1.09.03A of the Cupertino Municipal Code defines a
nuisance as anything which is declared by the City Council to be or likely to become
injurious to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with
the comfortable enjoyment of life or property; and
WHEREAS, there exists an accumulation of overgrown weeds in the front and
side yards, creating a possible fire and health hazard, on parcel 375-27-025; and
WHEREAS, as provided by Ordinance No. 794, the City Council shall hold a
public hearing to determine whether or not said condition constitutes a public nuisance
and, if said determination is made, the City Council shall require abatement of said public
- nuisance by immediate removal of all debris/trash.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino does, upon adoption of this resolution, establish the date of November 15,
1999, 6:45 p.m., as the time and 10300 Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California as the place
wherein public testimony will be taken relative to the determination as to whether or not
a public nuisance exists and if so determined, what type of abatement is necessary.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 18th day of October, 1999, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Bumett, Chang, Dean, James, Statton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/Kimberly Smith /s/Wally Dean
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
OTV OF SUMMARY
CUPEI TINO
Agenda No. .~,O Agenda Date: November 15, 1999
SUBJECT:
Request for General Plan Amendment to change land use on the "Santa Barbara Grill" site I'rom
general retail to office. The project site is located at 10745' North DeAnza Boulevard.
A letter from Mr. Michael Del Monico and David Wheeler addressed to Mayor Wally Dean is
attached for your consideration. The letter seeks permission to initiate a general plan hearing to
consider modification to the land use section of the general plan to allow oft]ce development on
the existing retail site. Although the land use diagram for the general plan and zoning map allow
a mixture of land uses including office development, the development allocation tables del]nc
permitted land use intensity. The values were derived by applying floor area ratios to the land
use pattern which was in place in 1991 (the plan was ultimately adopted in December 1993).
The subject site was designated retail.
With regard to retail commercial, the existing retail building area tbr each parcel was l?ozcn.
Future development potential for retail was collected into a pool to be reaiiocated based upon
development objectives. (Please refer to the attached general plan excerpts) The applicant's
request is to demolish an existing restaurant building and to build an office development, in
order to accomplish that objective, the applicant must either obtain a transtar of ottlce
development potential from another site or seek a general plan modil]eation to allow c~mversi~m
of retail credits to office and to apply that credit to his property. Your attention is drawn to
general plan pages, 2-9 and 2-26 which state that the policy to allow the conversion of retail pool
space to office was only granted to the northeast comer of DeAnza Boulevard and Stevens Creek
Boulevard. This was done to promote the redevelopment of the Crossroads.
Criteria for adoption of General Plan
'l'l~e city's municipal cone section 20.02.025 contains criteria that the City Council should use to
determine whether a general plan amendment is wan'anted. The applicant's letter ot' November
3, 1999 states that the site has been used as a restaurant for fifteen years and that despite winning
several awards, the restaurant has failed and is in Chapter 11-bankruptcy reorganization. The
applicants have concluded that the location of and the access to the site are not conducive liar
retail use. The applicant's letter of November 3 does not directly address three criteria, however
one could conclude that the property owners could not have foreseen that the original
commercial designation and subsequent construction of a restaurant would not be successful due
to the lack of good access. In staff's perspective, lack of access would be particular true liar a
non-restaurant retail use.
Pnnl~/on Reclec~O
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recognizes the fact that three restaurants have failed on the subject site a,ad in mid 1980 il
relatively new, large restaurant building located next door was demolished and replaced bx' an
office. Staff recommends that the City Council initiate the hearing and that at the hearing thc
following analysis be conducted prior to making a decision regarding the amendment itsel f:
· The impacts of converting retail to office be assessed not in terms ofdetermining whether it
would result in diminished pool of retail space which would not meet the Cit?s retail
(fiscal) objectives.
· To evaluate the possible aesthetics relative to the general plan design ob. iectives and thc
North DeAnza Boulevard conceptual plan.
State law mandates that a mandatory element of the general plan can be amended ilo more than 4
times per year. Since the amendment will most likely be completed in the year 2000. 3
additional amendments can be. scheduled in year 2000 including the comprehensive general plan
amendment scheduled for the spring.
SUBMITTED BY: SUBMITTED BY:
Robert S. Cowan, Director of Don Brown, City Manager
Community Development
Enclosures:
Letter from Michael Del Monico dated November 3, 1999
General Plan excerpt (pages 2-7 through 2-9 and 2-26)
Excerpt from Section 20.02.025 of the Municipal Code regarding General Plan Amendment
g/planning/cc/gpchangc
~ · Michael Del Monaco
1070 Commercial St./SIc. 107
]~ ~r]f) ~ · s~ J6se, CA 95.112
S~m B~b~a Grill, LLC
- Cupe~mo, CA 95014
November 3,~1999
His Honor, Mayor Wally Dean ,
' Gl~pertino City H-ql
103'00 Tone Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Dear Mayor Dean:
We are requesting City Council and Planning Commit, sion approval o~a general plan amendment for the
site located at 10745 North De.Anza Boulevard. The existing zoning is Planned Development (General
Commercial, Light Industrial and Residential 4-10 Dwellings per Acre), and the general plan land use
design, ation is Office, Indus~al, Commercial and Residential. We are requesting a change to the
development reallocation, policies to permit the d~nolition of the existing restaurant to be replaced with an
office building which is consistent with the City's policies and gods.
Currently, and for the past 15 years, the site has bean used as a re~tanrant. Th~ current restaurant, Santa
Barbara Grill, is in chapter 11-bankruptcy reorganization. The failure of the restaurant is not an operational
issue as the restaurant has won several awards. This has simply proven to be an inappropriate use for this
site as three different restaurant tenants have failed over the years. The location of and access to this site are
not adequat~ fo[ retail use. ,
We have thoroughly analyzed all other potential uses for this site and have determined that an office use
would be the most appropriate becaus6 of the circulation and location, and it is consistent with the adjacent
, uses. Our proposal for this very visible site is for a three-story,0,000 square foot office building with a
parking structure, part of which Jill be subterranean. W~e will provide the necessary parking and satisfy the
setback and height requirements for this area and dsc. The quality of our design for the proposed project'
will be suitable for this gateway to the C/ty of Cupertino, and will be a design the City of Cupertino will be
proud of.
We bereby request that on Nov~raber 15, 1999, the City Council initiate a public hearing to considc~ the "
general pla~ amendm/nt to allow offi~ development at 10745 North De Anza Boulevard.
Sincerely, '
MICHAEL DEL MONACO SAN~~, LLC '
Michael Del Monaco ,. David Whaler
MDM/DW:ks
Cup(trine. CA
Phon~ ,kO8.2S3.22,33
Fix 4,0a.2S3.S982
Land Use/Community Character 2- 7
These policies had numerous effects on the City. Non-residential bufld~g patterns
have typicalJy been low pro~e and uniform in height, .making it difficult to focus develop-
ment intensity to shape the City's built form and identity. Imbalances in commercial, of-
lice/industrial and residential development potential in relation to mazket demand have
res~ted in under uH1;Ted commercial spaces, low office vacancies and hi~ housing demand.
To adcL~ess these issues, the development regulatory policies xre revised as
Polic~! 2-3: D~velopme~t ReallocaHo~
Development activity shouJd be controlled so that the City street system is
not overwhelmed with traffic and the desired transportation level of ser-
vice is maintained. To meet the City's goals and priorities, the remaining
uncommitted development potential that achieves the City's trax~,'portation
goaJs shouJd be rea[located as shown below. Further adjustments to these
allocations may be necessary to ensure that the City's transportation goals
a:e met.
Development Reallocation Table
Peak Hour
Raslloceted General Trip Factor/
Land Uas 1990 Committed Potential Plan 1000 Iq.ft., RNIIoceted
Built Growth(1~ Growth Buildout Room or DU THI~
~ " a b c a+b+c d c'd
Retail 3,359,000 573,000 500,000 4,431,CXX)m 2.60 1,300
(sq. fL)
Office/Ind 7,457,000 541,000 1,294,000 9,292,C)00~ 1.7C) 2,200
(sq. ft.)
Hotel 277 250 500 1,027 0.40 200
(morns)
Housing 17,460 584 2,000 20,044 0.80 1,600
(DU)
Total 5,300
o) Committed growth refer, to growth potential that has been approved through uae
permits, veating mape and/or development agreements, but has not been built as of S~ FOLZCY 2-24
1990. The committed growth will be mallaceted by the City if a use pemlit expirs~ or (ST~ 2)
the project i~ determined to be inconsistent with ~e General Plan.
m These numbers are flexible due to the ability to convert rataJl spe~e to office apace at
the northeast comer of DeAnzm/Steven. Creek Boulevards, as demcribed in Policy 2-24.
This policy recognizes that a finite amount of development can take place
committed development poten~ from !_,~_ than buildout ~,ro~,.., ~ would
approval processes and the following development priorities tables. The
d
THE r, GPEIITINO (~ENERAI. PLAN
Land Use/Community Character
Development hat~a-.~ity M~mu~l will be modified to provide detailed pro-
cedures regarclin§ development allocations.
Stretches
Housing or mixed-use 1. The Ci~ will modib/existing Planned Development zones and area plans
development Js eh- and/or develop new specific plans to "freeze" building areas on each re-
coura~.d on commer- tau commercial zoned or used propert7 as of June 1, 1993. Future retail
cial sites which do not commercial growth can occur in areas that have allocated retail growth.
have existing commer-
cial development po- l:uture retail commercial growth will not be regulated by PAR standards.
tmtial, particularly if Growth will be dependent upon allocation of space from retail commercial
the sites are unlikely to development priorities table.
receive commeudal
devel~t alloca-
uom ~howa i~ the 2. New retail comn,~ growth listed in the Development Reallocation Table
~ Commemal may be allocated as foUows:
Developme~mt Priorities
table.
Retail Commemlel Development Prioritlum
SE~ DEVEI.OFM~n' · Along or near Stevens Creek Boulevard to support the 250,000 sq. ft.
l~nu~,rr~ IVfAWJAL Heart of the City policy.
· Remodeling and development of major retail centers on 40,000 sq. ft.
5+ acre sites outside of the Heart of City and on major
arterial streets.
· Mixed use developments with residences outside of the 35,000 sq. ft.
Heart of the City.
· Development or revitalization of other commercial parcels. 50,000 sq. ft.
· Power Retailer (i.e. high volume discourtt retailer) 125,000 sq. ft.
· Full service hotel(s), appropriate Ioc~ion evaluated 500 rooms
at time of proposal
m These numbers are flexible due to the ability to convert retail space to office
space at the northeast comer of DeAnza/~tevane Creek Boulevards, as
described in Policy 2-24.
3.Office, Research and DevelOPment and Industrial growth listed in the De-
velopment Reallocation Table may be reallocated as foUows:
Offlc~lnduBtriM ~)lWIGV,,~e,at Pdorltles~')
S~ ~ · r'lv&iop,,,g,~ potential n~corcling to b~e FAR conatmints 1.033,000 sq. ft.
IN~E~srrY MAmmAL mVJ tr&'tsferred develop,,,e~4 c~ciits renmins with existing
office mid incluatrial pirrc:Ms.*
· Town Center & Crossroads Comers 91,000 sq. ft.
· Nort-dealgrmlid pool to be -Uc)c-,ted based on the 150,000 sq. ft.
following prtsritise: :'.. ': .~
- Company with 1,500+ emplwees ~
- compa corporm h,,dqu,rmrs
T,£ cuPmrr,No GG. NGRAL PLAN
Lancl Use/Community Character t 2-9
· . · Office and Industrial property owners may transfer unused development
potential from one property to another subject.to pdor City approval. Such
properties must be zoned Planned Development and the degree of transfer is
determined in part on the permitted land use intensity of the transfemng site.
New development will be subject to traffic mitigation measures as stringent as "
those imposed on the Apple Gateway Project (file no. 11-U-90).
Property owners possessing bonus square footage authorized by the 1983
General Plan retain such square footage.
The base FAR for industrial designation on the General Plan Land Use
Diagram is 0.33. The designation for office and office/R&D is .37.
(4) These numbers are flexible due to the ability to convert retail space to office
space at the northeast comer of De Anza/Stevens Creek Boulevards, as
described in Policy 2-24.
---- 4. Housing units listed in the Development 1/eellocation Table n~y be reallo-
cared as follows:
ReMdentlal Development Prioritise (See Figure 2-B)
· Residential density potential, based on existing general plan 516 S~ DL=vam.O~
residential land use designations, remains with existing ~ MANUAL
· ~- residential parcels.
..... ;"' · North De Anza Boulevard Area 150
· Vailco Park 500-550(s)
· Heart of the City Specific Planning Area 500
· Bubb Road between Stevens Creek Boulevard and McClellan Rood 150
· Undesignated pool 184
Housing in the North De Anz. a Boulevard and Bubb Road areas shall generate
no more peak hour traffic than the office/industrial uses it replaces.
~) 50 Additional unite may be transferred from the undesignated category to
accommodate applications 14-u-g6 and 15-u-g6.
5. Mm'e ~ crite~ fo~ evaluating projects which request a share of these
6. The squaze footase, zoom ami dwelling u~it allocafim~s o~ the clevelopmmt
priorities tables nay be reviewed by the City mm an aunual basis to ensure
fiat the development priorities meet City needs and 8oals.
2-26 Land Use/Community Character
I Policy 2-24: Hrban FOcal Points
Intensify the focus o~ urban development in Vallco Park, North De Anza
Boulevard, Town Center, and Stevens Creek Boulevard planning areas,
subject to design and transportation network controls.
Strategies
1. Multiple-Story Buildings and Residential Districts. Allow construction
of multiple-story buildings in Vallco Park, Town Center, Stevens Creek
Boulevard and North De Anza Boulevard [f it is found that nearby residen-
tial districts wiil not suffer from privacy intrusion or be overwhelmed by
the scale of a building or group of builctings.
2. Maximum Building Heights and Setback Ratios. The maximum height
and setback ratios for new buildings in various.plarming areas are speci-
fied in Figure 2-D.
Portions of planning areas abutting residential areas are subject to a
maximum height limit in addition to other measures to mitigate visual in-
trusion. The 45-~oot height area, as welt as other areas, are graphically de-
scribed in the building b-eights map. In the 'town Center, the maximum
existing building height is defined by the City Center twin office towers.
'- In the Vallco Park area, the maximum comu~ttmt building height is defined
by the Vallco Fashion Mall expansion (file no. 9-U-90), which is subject to a ~....~
development agreement. The Tandem Jackpot project (File No. 13-U-88),
approved at the northwest corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Tantau
Avenue, is specifica~y exmnptmi f~om the above new height limitations and
would define the maximum existing buildh~ height in the Vallco Park area
ff built. Th~ height exception applies to the current use permit and any
p~rmit e0am~on granted by the City. At the northeast comer only, allow a
stanfial re~. presence on that site. The maximum height of landmark build-
mg sUaU be ~ ft. with substantihl easement for dedication of open space
elements of the Genm~ Plan, including traffic, are satisfied. The Sandhill
Properties Hot~ Use Permit 15-U-96, approved at the southwest corner of
Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Avenue, is specifically exempted from the
Lmdmark buildings are buildings of promiv~nt community stature that
a) Location on a major street frontage.
occur per year under the provision of California
Government Code Section 65358, the City Council
may initiate consideration of a proposed generitl
plan nv~.ndm~t upon written request by the Plan-
ning Cc~-~i-~ion or any inunested person. Said
Comnmni~, Development and mtnnitted to the City
forty-five days of its
consider such a general plan nmendrrpnt proposal
· and is comp-~ble with th~ existing L, eneral plan
meet at least one of the following criteria:
1. The propoml appears m ~ ~ ~g
general plan goals and objectives (although th~
mined until the project is fully
Upon initi~tg ti~ con.~i,4~on of a gtmeral
plan ,~m~m,~t under this ~se.~*io~ tl~ City
Council will imnuet4i.teJy nsfm' the proposal lo the
Phmning Commi.~ion for its x,_co.,,.,.--,dntlcm, tm-
der the pt~.ci~cs described in the California Gov-
emmmt Code.
With respect m proposats co ..... .,-,,ce.4 by an
~ (pm), 1994)
$88..104 . .~..
.~. ~ SUMMARY
CITY OF Agenda No. ~ / Agenda Date: November 15, 1999
CUPEI TINO
Consideration of appeal for Planning Commission regarding application 8-U-99 and 21 -EA-g9.
HOK Architects: A 1750 sq. ft. "learning center" adjoining Torre Ave.
BACKGROUND
At its November 1 st meeting, the City Council denied the appeal and granted thc application
subject to additional conditions. The conditions are:
1. The construction may not begin before 8:00 a.m.
2. Symantec Corporation will amend its letter regarding the availability ct'the Learning Center
to public and non-profit groups.
3. The subsequent approval by the city council of landscaped median improvements on Torrc
Avenue.
The City Council agreed to limit the discussion on November 15" to the median. The applicants
met with the Director of Public Works. The meeting resulted in the preparation of a drawing
intended to meet the Council's objective. The plan includes the installatim~ of three additional
.-. median strips in the Torte Ave right-of-way. The conceptual drawing is attached, it is not
feasible to extend the median further than depicted on the drawing because of utilities in the road
section. The median would allow access to all the properties as illustrated.
The applicants are in the process of accessing the median proposal and will respond verbally at
the November 15 hearing.
The applicant re-drafted the letter regarding public and educational non-prolit access to the
Learning Center. The letter dated November 9 is attached together with the original letter dated
September 20.
RECOMMENDATION
Listen to the applicant's position regarding the construction of the median and respond by
approving, modifying, or denying the application.
SUBMITTED BY: SUBMITTED BY:
Robert S. Cowan, Director of Don Brown, City Manager
Community Development
g/planninfJcc/symantecmedian
P~nted on ~ Pa~r
November 9, 1999 "
Ci~ or ~o
lO:3OO Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-32S5
RE: S)~nautec City Center 2 Building
I~srwt~II Ceam'
Dem' Council Members:
On bob~ of
~ not ~
I99g m~.
We~~ o~ ~m'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~~
S~ly,
Scpmmber 20. 1999
Mr. David DoyJe
Chaizpg~on, Planning
City of Cupertino
10300 Torte Avenue
Cutgttino, CA 9~014-3255
RE: Syme~t,"c City Cer~r 2 Building
Le~g Center
~h"..-. ~ 1~'' Doylc:
On l~,wof Symantec Co, p~,~on. I would like to ofr~
available to thc co~,m,-;ty in mz Ci~ Cent~ 2 ~ We of~r to nutkc thc kenming
C~uun- eveilablc eppto~,,t~tely s4~imes · year ~or public or non. pro~ uses sponsored
by the Ci~. It is o~r proposal that any use of them fll-flle~ must be public events
_. sponsored by dm Office of the City M-n~r. durh~ non-wodci~ houra.
that ~ny oti~r conditions ofuse be ~ ulxm between d~ Cup~ City Manager and
Symantec's Vice Presi~ of Worldwide Lo~i.sdr. s ,~a Pacfll~ies.
assure that our on-going businms is not intmupu~ ,~a~ em our sccufity and
con~i,4t-nt;-BU are properly
We extmd rids of~r for the dumion of Symamec's occupancy. If Symantec is not tl~
sole occupant of the CC2 Building, commun~py uae may not be possible in the same
f-,b;rm Fugh~, this letter is aubjcct ~o l~e Lcarntn.e Cmuer'a approvals and desi~
(.:..- as proposed and discttssed althe September ~3,1999
We hapc this olT~r assists the pl.~,.;,~, Commission in supportl~ our ptajccc
; /oim . Sore, Jr.
L,~/'icc ~csident or' Worldwide Logistics end Facilities
8-U-99
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 5070
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 1,750 SQ. FT. ADDTION (LEARNING
CENTER) AT AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING
SECTION I: FINDINGS
~ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use
· ~" Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public
hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has
satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
i."."; Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this rifle.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based
and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No.8-U-99 as set forth in the
Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 27 1999, and are incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
Resolution No. 5070 8-U-99 September 27.1999
Page-2
SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: 8-U-99
Applicant: HOK Architects
Location: 20330 Torte Avenue (For Symantec Corp.)
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The approval is granted based upon Exhibit labeled "Symantec CC2, Proposed Learning
Center", Sheets A0 through A5 dated 6/3/99 and L-1 dated 7/1/99, except that the awning
leading to the main entrance may be removed.
',-.-:~::' 2. LEARNING CENTER
The 1750 square foot "Learning Center" is conditionally approved contingent upon the
reconstruction of approximately 6,000 square feet of office space to cafeteria space as depicted
on Sheet Al. The Learning Center shall be available for public or non-profit uses as described
in the Symantec letter of September 20, 1999.
3. GLAZING
The Learning Center shall use "vision" glass similar in color to the existing buildings.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
. such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
f" hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the
requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. GRADING
Grnding shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08
of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
2. DRAINAGE
-- Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Surface flow across public
sidewalks may be allowed in the R-l, R-2 and R-3 zones unless storm drain facilities are deemed
Resolution No. 5070 8-U-99 September 27, 1999
Page-3
necessary by the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on
site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains
are not available, drainage facilities shall be 'installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
3. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No.
331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate
with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall
submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions: Said plans shall be subject to prior
approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
4. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall ~ntcr into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino
providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm
drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be
,~-~:; executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 5% of Improvement Cost or $1,975.00 min
b. Development Maintenance Deposit: $3,000.00
c. Storm Drainage Fee: $4$0.00/acre
d. Power Cost: N/A
e. Map Checking Fees: N/A
f. Park Fees: N/A
g. Reimbursement fee: To be determined from reimbursement agreement
The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City
Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final
map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at
that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
5. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be
screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not
visible from public stl'eet areas.
6. DEDICATION OF WATERLINE
The developer shall execute a quitclaim deed for underground water rights to City of Cupertino
and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject
development.
Resolution No. 5070 8-U-99 September 27, 1999
Page-4
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF
ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 Callfomia Government Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. of this
Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices.
Bert Viskovich, City Engineer
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27~ day of September, 1999, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
,,;..:.~.... AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Kwok, Stevens and Chairman Doyle
,~.- NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Harris
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/ Robert S. Cowan Is/ David Doyle
Robert S. Cowan David Doyle, Chairman
Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission
· . g:/pdrepon/tes/tesSu99
PROPOSE:D:
I.IrARNING ~N~R
10201 T~re A~nue
~ 4
/ SYMANTEC CC2
! II / PROPOSED
~~ / AUOITORIUM
· ~ ....... ' ~";.- 10201 Torre Avenue
.. - ,,. ~ /' Symantec
Cupertino, CA 05014
/ (4Del 253-0600
//l'/ Fax: {4061 730-3594
I I I 1
i I I I I I /'/'GCM, TI, ~
. / ~,.,,,,,,,~ c,.,.,I,,~
i .' . ~ ~, ,...~.... -..-~A.,
~. . .. -:?::~,~,~ ~ -. ...~'-~ .~. ·
I~.
· . ..
· ~. : / L-I~
!
: I SYUANTEC CC2
PROPOSED:
T~re
A~ue
~: , ~ ~ ,/
~p~t~K CA 9~14
- [ ..... . .... .
~ ~ P~ ~ [ I ....
~ ~ .......
~ F ~ ......... J -
~T~ ~e F~LY
!
SUMMARY ~
Agenda No. Agenda Date: November 15, 1999
Consideration of appeal for Planning Commission regarding application 8-U-99
and 21-EA-99, HOK Architects: A 1750 sq ft "learning center" adjoining Torte
Ave.
Background
At its November 1 st meeting, the City Council denied the appeal and granted the
application subject to additional conditions.The conditions are:
1. The construction may not begin before 8:00 a.m.
2. Symantec Corporation will amend its letter regarding the availability of the
Learning Center to public and non profit groups.
3. The subsequent approval by the city council of landscaped median
improvements on Torre Avenue.
The City Council agreed to limit the discussion on November 15t" to the median.
The applicants met with the Director of Public Works. The meeting resulted in the
preparation ora drawing intended to meet the Councils objective. The plan
includes the installation of three additional median strips in the Torte Ave right of
way. The conceptual drawing is attached. It is not feasible to extend the median
further than depicted on the drawing because of utilities in the road section. The
median would allow access to all the properties as illustrated.
The applicants are in the process of accessing the meeting proposal and would be
able to respond verbally at the November 15 hearing.
The applicant re-drai~ed the letter regarding public and educational non-profit
access to the Learning Center. The letter dated November 9 is attached together
with the original letter dated September 20.
Recommendation
Listen to the appl. icants position regarding the construction of the median and
respond by either approving, modifying, or denying the application.
THESE ARE FOR STAFF INFORMATION
ONLY AND ARE NOT THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORD
COUNCIL ACTIONS AND STAFF RESPONSIBILITY
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL &
REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
November I, 1999
City Hall Council Chamber
17. Consideration of appeal of the Planning Commission decision regarding AI)l)lic~lti()ns 8-U-
99 nnd 21-U-99 of HOK Architects (for Symnntec Co~por'ation). The :~pplication requested
a use permit to construct a 1,750 sq. ft. addition (Learning Center) to ;m existing office
building located at 20330 Torre Avenue..(Mayor Wnlly Denn, appellant).
C/A Denied appeal and granted the application and approved the Planning Commission'.~
recommendations as amended:
I) construction may not begin before 8:00 a.m.
2) Symantec Corp. will amend its letter about the Lcaming Center's av;~ilnbiJity to
delete reference to events "sponsored by the Cupertino city manager"
3) the approval of the application is conditional upon subsequent approval by tl~c city
council of median improvements on Torte Avenue.
._ 4) recommendations on the median will come back to council in two weeks
S/R CC place on I !/! S agenda, notit'y interested parties: CD note.
City Hill,
10300 Torte Avenue
'~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone.' (408) 777-3223
('ii\' ()t' FAX: (408) 777-3366
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 22 Meeting Date: November 15, 1999
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Request from Marc G. Hynes, Esq., attorney for Steven D. Hoffman, appealing the decision of the
city manager regarding use of city park facilities by the Cupertino Union School District for
commercial day care center operations.
BACKGROUND
Attached are a series of letters that reflect correspondence between the City of Cupertino, Mr.
- Hoffman, and Mr. Hynes.
The letter dated October 11, 1999, includes the decision of the city manager which was appealed to
the city council.
Submitted by: Approved for submission:
Kimberly Smith Donald D. Brown
City Clerk City Manager
Attachments: Correspondence ranging from July 2, 1998 through Nov. 9, 1999
Printe~l on Recycled P,~er
I _~m in receipt of your letter 'dated October 27, 1999, ~di~g Mr.
Hoffman's appeal c~the deei-~nu of the City Me,~s~er Donald Brown regarcling the.
use afVm,~ Park by the Cupertino Union School Dislaict and the Northwest
YAICA for day care center operat/ons.
Mz. H_nfFman ~s presently engaged in sett/ement discussions with the
District and the YMCA. As a part of these di.sctm~ons, Mr. HoFF,-an also wishes to
explore the possibility of acquiring from the city a portion of city-owned proper~
adjacent to his residence. The proper~ is a portion of the half-~reet some_~mes
referred to as "old Crescent Way."
l~eco~mi~i~g the importance o~presenting all pertinent issues to the City,
Council at the he_~,~-g, as set out in your October 27, 1999, letter, it is requested '
that this matter be heard as scheduled, but continued for de-L~ion
and complete report can be presented to the Council by the City Staff concerning
Mr. Hoi~an's request. It is believed that the existing concerns regarding the
YIVICA use of Cupertino Union School Dist~ct property and the proper enforcemen~
of City ordi-snce, q concerning Varian Park can be successfully resolved if some
add/t/alia] bu~ering can be achieved through the pzoposed proper~y acquisition.
MGH:cwb ~ HYNES
cc: '" Donal~ Brown, City 1~
C. ~fl~, City Attorney
Fr~ and P~nelope Desa~ey
Briau and J~¢sr Stroub
Den-i- 'J. Ward, Esq. .~,~
J~mez R. Hawley, Esq.
!RECEIVED
.-- ' OCT 2 1 1999
ATKINSON · FARASYN, LLP
BY:
LEONARD J. SlEGAL ATTORNEYS AT LAW
HAROLD $. TOPPEL
ROBERT K. BOOTH, JR. 660 WEST DANA STREET
STEVEN 0. BAIRD P.O. BOX 279 j.ta. ATKIN$ON (1892-1982)
MARC O. HYNE~ MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94042 L.M. FARA~YN ( 1915-1979)
TELEPHONE (650) 967-6941
FACSIMILE (6,,~) 967-1395
October 19, 1999
HonOrable Mayor Wally Dean and City Council
City of Cupertino
City HaU
10300 Torte Avenue
Cuperti_'no, CA 95014
Re: YMCA Daycare Center
Varian Park Parking Lot
_ Stevens Creek Elementary School
Dear Mayor Dean and City Councflmembers:
This letter is intended to serve as an appeal of the decision of City
Manager Donald D. Brown dated October 11, 1999.
The City Manager has denied the appeal of Steven D. HoC'man which
m~intnlns that City park fseill.ties are being improperly used by the Cupertino
Union School District for commercial daycare center operations. This use has
adverse effects upon the neighboring residents including Mr. Hoff~n~n, ~nd violates
existing City land use and zoning requirements. The City Manager bases his
opinion upon the "spirit" of a joint use and maintenance agreement between the
City and the school district which, it is submitted, does not authorize the City to
ignore the provisions of its own ordinances, ~11 as recited in the documentation
presented by Steven D. Hoffman to the City Attorney and the City Manager.
A hearing on this matter before the City Council is hereby requested.
g a~o~aey for Steven D. Hoffman
MGH:cwb
City Hall
! 0300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel: (408) 777-3212
CITY OF F,,s,x: (4o8) 777-3366
CUPEILTINO donb( ¢upertino.otg
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
October 11, 1999
Steven D. Hoffman
20370 Town Center Lane, #100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Appeal Regarding Day Care Center
Parking at Varian Park
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
After reviewing all the evidence presented, I have determined the decision of the Public Works
Director is correct.
It appears, based upon traffic studies conducted by the City, that the cun'ent use of the Varian
Park parking lot as a pick-up and delivery point for children walking to and from the day care
center does not adversely affect the availability of the parking lot for park activities. Even though
the Varian Park parking lot is technically within the park boundary, the parking lot facilities need
only be sufficient to serve the park. See Cupertino Municipal Code § 19.68.0300~). The existing
joint use and maintenance agreement between the City and the school district specifically
recognizes and approves the location of the day care center. The spirit of this agreement suggests
that the City cooperate with the district in making available parking (which is generally unneeded.
for park purposes during the day care center's hours of operation) for pickup and delivery of
children to the center.
It further appears that any action taken by the City to prohibit pick-up and delivery of children at
the parking lot will move the problem closer to you in that cars will pick-up and deliver children
on the public street in front-of your house which would create more serious impacts to your
neighborhood.
You have the right to .appeal this administrative derision to the City Council by ~ing with the
City Clerk a written request which states the specific reason for the appeal within lO business
days of the date of the mailing of this letter.
__
C~y Marmger ~'~' ~
cc: Marc Hynes
LAW OF'PICICS, OF'
· -- ST~.v~.~ D. Ho~~
20370 TOWN CE~NT£1~ LANE, 5UIT~ IOO
CUP]~RTXNO, CALXFO~'XA 9~0t4
July 28, 1999
Mr. Don Brown, City Manager
City of Cupertino
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Appeal/Request for Reconsideration regarding City's Determination
Refusing to Enforce City Code
Dear Mr. Brown:
This letter is to confirm our conversation of this date in which we agreed to
· - reschedule the Hearing on the above referenced from Tuesday August 17th to
Thursday September 2nd at 10:00 a.m. in your office. This will also confirm that
this rescheduling was at my request.
Ve:!Y°ur,__$1y~-0ferati°nyours, in this regard is appreciated.
SDH:mn
Enclosures
cc: Marc G. Hynes, Esq.
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel: (408) 777-3212
City ol' FAX: (408) 777-3366
Cupertino
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
June 30, 1999
Steven D. Hoffman
20370 Town Center Lane Suite 100
Cup~dno, CA 95014
Re:. Appeal/Request for Reconsideration
Dear Mr. Hoffrnan:
In response to your letter dated June 10, 1999, and in accordance with the Cupertino Municipal Code,
Chapter 1.16, Sec. 1.16.020, I am hereby scheduling a hearing to review your appeal and request for
reconsideration.
The hearing will be on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at 9 a.m., at Cupertino City Hall, 10300 Torre ·
Avenue, Cupertino.
City Manager
cc. C. Kilian, City Attorney
B. Viskovich, Director of Public Works
S. Dowling, Director of Parks and Recreation
C. Corr, Cupertino Union School District
Cupcl ;ilio .....
Office of the City Attorney Charles T. Kilian
10320 S. DeAnza Blvd.,//ID City Attorney
Cupertino, CA 95014 Eileen Murray
Ph: (408) 777-3405 Assistant City Attorney
Fax: (408) 77%3401
June 7, 1999
Steven D. Hoffman
20370 Town Center Lane, #100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Request for Code Enforcement
iq/arian Park)
Dear Hoffman:
Thank you for your letter of May 27, 1999. As Mr. Viskovich has informed you by
telephone on a number of occasions, he plans to take no further action with respect to
your request. City staff has determined that:
1) The current incident use of a small portion of the Varian Park parking lot
by parents for pickup and delivery of children is de minimus vis-h-vis park usage and
therefore, does not violate Chapter 13.04 of the municipal code.'
2) Frankly, the City does not see anything wrong with parents temporarily
parking along the curb next to the child care center even though it technically lies
within the park boundary.
3) Any effort by the City to stop parents from temporarily parking at that
location would create more serious impacts in front of your house which is served by
a public street adjacent to the park.
4) The existing joint use and maintenance agreement between the City and the
school district specifically recognizes the location of the day care center. The spirit of
- this agreement envisions cooperation between the City and the school district with
respect to the use of the day care center. Parents have utilized a small portion of the
Varian Park parking lot to drop off and pickup their children for a number of years. __.~
Steven D. Hoffman
June 7, 1999
Page 2
To prohibit parents from parking along the curb where they have parked for a number
of years may violate the spirit of the joint use and maintenance agreement.
Section 1.16.020 of the City's ordinance code provides that any person aggrieved or
affected by any City determination, including any obligation fOr abatement of any
nuisance, may appeal said determination to the City Manager within ten business days
of this letter of determination.
If you have any questions, please feel free t o call.
Sineer~y7 J
Charles T. Kilian
City Attorney
SS
cc: Bert Viskovich
Don Brown
Jim Hawley, Esq.
,.w o.,c., o~ RECEIVED
--' STEVEN D. HOFFlv~AN
=o~?o ~'ow,~ c~-,~ ~-~, s~,-, ~oo JUN 1 4 1999
C~HT~O. C~~ ~O~4
,BY:
TELEPHO N E FAC51M
i408) a52-~gO0 {40Bi 252-5g0~
June ]0, ]9~
Mr. Don Brown, City Manager
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Appeal/Request for Reconsideration regarding City's Determination
Refusing to Enforce City Code
Dear Mr. Brown:
Enclosed please find a letter from the City Attorney, Charles Kilian, denying a
request for code enforcement, which I requested by letter of May 27, a copy of
· -' which is. also enclosed. Mr. Kilian's letter suggests that I may appeal the City's
determination to you for reconsideration. This appeal is made on the grounds set
forth below.
As set forth in my letter of lVlay 27th, the Municipal Code of the City of Cupertino
provides certain protection to property owners that adjoin a park. ! am such a
property owner as are the two neighbors which signed the letter of May 27th. The
City code provides plainly that use of parks, and in this case Varian Park, is
required to be for park purposes or is unlawful and is to be considered a public
nuisance.
The code also plainly provides that the School District was required to make
appropriate application for use of the park parking lot before using it inthe manner
it is now being used. Since it has not made an application or requested permission
to use the park parking lot and since no public hearing has been held to consider
that request, I find there is no reason why the i2ity should refuse to enforce its own
municipal code. It has never been requested by the School District that an
exception be allowed for the school in this particular situation.
- The denial of the request for code enforcement in Mr. Kilian's letter is based on
four statements:
Mr. Don Brown
June 10, 1999
Page 2
1. Mr. Kilian first indicates that only a small portion of the Varian Park parking
lot is used by parents ',"or pickup and delivery of children. I do not believe
that Mr. Kilian has made an investigation to determine how much of the park
parking lot is being used. I can tell you as a neighbor that the parking lot
is filled with day care users for the better part of the hours between
7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. in the morning and likewise during the afternoon
hours between 4:00 and 7:00 p.m. During these hours parents pickup and
deliver children. The parking lot is used all day by staff members of' the
student village. In relation to other users of' the park, this use is not de
iminimus but rather is significant.
2. Mr. Kilian then indicates that "the City does not see anything wrong with
parents temporarily parking along the curb next to the child care center even
though it technically lies within the park boundary." Again, reference is
made to the remarks in paragraph 1 above. If there were only occasional
traffic along the curb leading to the child care center, there would not be a
problem. Again, the parking lot is oRen full and the use of the parking lot
is not limited in any way to parking along the curb next to the child care
center.
3. Mr. Kilian then remarks that "any effort by the City to stop parents from
temporarily parking at that location would create more serious impacts in
front of your house which is served by a public street adjacent to the park."
My response to this conclusion is that it has nothing whatsoever to do with
the City's obligation to enforce its own code provisions, it is also
conclusory. Efforts certainly should be made to have parents who use the
day care center on the Stevens Creek Elementary School Ground use the
Stevens Creek Elementary parking lot. Use of the school parking lot is
appropriate for school related uses.- If the School District intended to use the
park parking lot when the da~ care center was built, it should have applied
for a permit to do so and allowed the neighbors, such as myself, notice and
an opportunity to be heard in the appropriate forum. Again, the City appears
to be siding with the School District without even having an application from
the School District requesting use of the Varian Park parking lot.
4. Mr. Kilian then cites the "existing joint rise and maintenance agreement
between the City and d~e School District" and indicates that its "specifically
recognizes the location of the day care center." if either the School District
or the City intended to use the park parking lot when the day care center was
built, it should have made appropriate application or given the neighbors
notice and opportunity to be heard. Chuck Corr of the School District
testified in his deposition that the School District had never intended to use
the Varian Park parking lot when it built the day care center.
Mr. Kilian then indicates that "parents have' utilized a small portion of the
Varian Park parking lot to drop off and pickup their children for a number
of years." In response to this I can only say that I have been complaining
about this situation for years. Rather than addressing my concerns when the
original day care building was installed, the School District went forward
with building and pla,:ing a second student village building at the same
location, increasing traffic, noise and congestion without again seeking
appropriate permission from the City or giving the neighbors notice and
opportunity to be heard. Again, the City has turned its cheek to this
situation for years and now Mr. Kilian is claiming that i should not be heard
to complain because it has been going on tbr years. I find this argument
without merit.
On the basis set forth above, I would ask you to reconsider the current situation.
The quiet use and enjoyment of our properties as well as our property values have
been dramatically adversely affected. The letter and intent of the City code seeks
to prevent this without proper process. I have nothing against the YMCA mid
endorse their programs. However, this is not a question of the propriety of the
programs but the propriety of the process used by the School District and the City
to impose their will on private citizens without appropriate due process. I trust you
will give this matter your serious consideration and appreciate your efforts in this
regar~.~.__
;
V el~, ,tgtt'iy yours,
/
Steven D. Hof~
SDH:mn
Enclosures
-' cc: Marc G. Hynes, Esq.
LAW OF'I='IC~,~ OF'
STYriaN D. I--IOFFMAN
20370 TOWN CEiNTICR LANI=', ,~UITIr IO0
CUPI~-]HTINO, CALIFOI:~NIA
May 27, 1999
Charles T. Kilian, Esq.
City Attorney for City of Cupertino
10320 S. DeAnza Blvd., #1D
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Requegt for Code Enforcement
Illegal Use of Varian Park as Daycare Center
Dear Mr. Kilian:
I am enclosing copies of my last two letters to Bert Viskovich, Director of Public
Works of the City of Cupertino, regarding the continued illegal use of Varian Park
and the Varian Park parking lot as an integral part of the daycare center located at
Stevens Creek Elementary School. To date no action has been taken by the City
in response to these or my other letters and phone calls regarding this problem.
I am 'also enclosing a copy of the Municipal Code which has the following
pertinent c.o. de sections:
Chapter 13.04 relates to parks and is for the purpose of regulating the use of parks,
the persons using them and protecting the rights of those in the sun'ounding areas.
ChaPter 19.04.050 provides that "using any property in a manner contrary to tile
provisions of this title" constitutes a public nuisance.
Under Chapter 19.68.030 the code permits uses for park and recreation zones
specifically limiting parking to "E. Parking facilities as necessary for park usage."
The Cupertino Union School District is clearly in violation of 19.68.010 and
19.68.030 E. The purpose of the limitation on the parking facilities as necessary
for park uses is for the protection of the rights of adjoining property owners such
as myself.
Chapter 19.100.40 indicates that if tile School District wished to use the park
kilian.l~r
Charles T. Kilian, Esq.
May 21, 1999
Page 2
parking area in connection with the Student Village, it was required to make
application with the City and submit a detailed parking study which demonstrates
that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed parking supply and that the
proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional
use permit application in a planned developmental zone or via an exception for a
project which, is not located in the planned development zone. The District has
made no such application.
Chapter 19.112 provides further protection for adjoining property owners. The
Student Village is a non-conforming use and the District was required to proceed
to obtain a conditional use permit or variance, neither of which have been issued.
Chapter 19.04.050 provides that any use o1' property in a manner ccmts'arv to the
._. provisions of the title is unlawfi~l and a public nuisance and the ('~x' Attorney shall
commence such action or actions, proceeding or proceedings, as may be deemed
appropriate by the City Attorney for the abatement, removal, and adjoining thereof
in the manner provided by law, and shall take such other steps and shall apply 'to
such court or courts as may have jurisdiction to grant such relief as will abate and
remove sticli buildings or use and restrain and enjoin any person, from, or
corporation from .... using any property in a manner contrary to the provisions of
this title.
Chapter. 19.04.070 provides that a violator is guilty of a misdemeanor.
This is my last attempt to request the City take appropriate action to abate the
nuisance and the violation of the Municipal Code. Please advise as soon as
possible what steps your office will take to ensure the School District does not
continue to use the public park parking lot for purposes related to the daycare
center ~:~which no application has ever been applied lbr m' issued
I /
Ve~ t~u~ yours, ~.
~teven~HoI~n~)
SDH:mn
Enclosures ~*- I~
kiliandlr
The undersigned property owners on Varian Way support this letter and join in the
request made:
22232 Varian Way
Frank Desafey
Penny Desafey
22250 Varian Way
Brian Sroub
Jennifer Sroub
..A The undersigned property owners on Varian Way support this letter and join in the
request made:
22232 Varian Way i~'~k~t~ l ~,~~~ Frank Desafey ~
222 5o Vadafi Way
Brian S"roub
Jennifer S'.'roub
The undersigned property owners on Varian Way support this letter and join in the
request made:
22232 Varian Way _.
Frank Desafey
Penny Desafey
222 'soVariafi ~Vay ~~,~.~
LAW oFIrlC£$ OF
~'O370 TOWN ~t~'NT~'R [.ANr. ~UITE IOO
C~Z~O. C~O~Z~ ~O[~
.,.-,.oo PUBLIC WORKS
~P~ ': ~ ~,~.-"
Mr. Ben J. Viskovich
Director of Public Works
Ci~ of Cupertino, Ci~ Hall
10300 To~e Avenue
Cupoffino, CA 95014
Re: Request for Code Enforcement
Illegal Use of Varian Park as a Day Care Center
Dear Mr. Viskovich:
This follows my last letter to you dated November 2, 1998 concerning the
continued illegal activity by the operators and users of the day care center at
.- . Stevens Creek Elementary School. As I mentioned to you last week, our family
dog was mn over by a vehicle driving down Varian Way. Neither the YMCA,
Stevens Creek Elementary School nor the Cupertino Union School District have a
permit to use the park parking lot for access to the day care center. As I have
pointed out before, the Municipal Code of thc City of Cupertino provides that a
park can only be used for park purposes.
The day care center and its users are illegally using Varian Park and its parking
lot. Staff uses the parking lot for parking all day, five days a week. Parents use
the parking lot to park temporarily and to drop off and pick up their children.
Other vehicles use the park parking lot for maintenance and cleanup of the day care
buildings which are located on the Stevens Creek Elementary School site. In
addition, Varian Way is often lined with cars during the busiest times. During all
these times the Stevens Creek School parking lot stands empty. I have complained
in the past on numerous occasions that this is both illegal and has created an
unsafe and dangerous conditton. Even if it does not create a dangerous condition,
it is illegal activity and request is made that Cupertino enforce its own Municipal
Code. Since it does create a dangerous condition and the fact that the City is
ignoring this, it appears that the City will wait until a child is run over before
-- anything is done at all.
viskovic.l~
Bert J. Viskovich
April 22, 1999
Page 2
Once again, request is made that the City take enforcement action immediately to
stop the ille~gai traffic and use of the park parking lot.
!
Very .trtkly'" yours,
- ,, li~'/
Stcven D.
SDH:mn
cc: Mark Hynes, Esq.
Bob Cowan, Director of Community Development, Cupertino
Office of Code Enforcement, City of Cupertino
Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department
vi~kovio.llr
November 2, 1998
Bert Viskovich, Director of Public Works
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
KE: HOFI~MAN VS. CUSD
Dear Mr. Viskovich:
I write again in follow-up to my previous correspondence concernin8 the activities ofthe YMCA
operated day care center located at Stevens Creek Elementary School. As you know, the School
District erected a second student village modular building next to the original building which borders
Varian Park which neighbors my property.
In my action against the School District it has come to light that the SchoOl District never intended
to use the Varian Park parking facility as a drop-off and pick-up point for the student village. This
conclusion is based on the testimony of Charles Corr, Director of Facility Modernization for the
District. Nevertheless, the parents continue to use the parking lot as a pick-up and drop-off point
causing traffic up and down Varian Way to the end of the park each morning and afternoon. The
park parking lot is like a commercial zone, something that was never intended.
The School District did not apply for permission to the City nor was any permission given to use the
park. There was no public hearing authorizing the use of the park parking lot for this purpose.
In fact, the School District entered into an agreement with the YMCA which provided that the use
oftbe student village would be limited to district students. It has also come to light that the YMCA
has recruited children from outside the District, particularly for use in their summer programs. The
agreement between the District and the YMCA' specifically provides that the enrollment will be
limited to the' District students and that no expanded use can take place without taking into
consideration the effect on neighboring property owners. The YMCA appears to be in breach of that
..-- agreement.
I write again to request that the City enforce the City Municipal Code which requires the use of park
parking facilities for park purposes. The entire purpose of the Municipal Code relating to parks does
not allow any activities without taking into consideration the rights of the adjoining proper~y owners.
I continue to be affected on a daily basis with the traffic and noise. Each morning when I excise in
my backyard I can see and hear the cars coming to and from the parking area and they can see me as
well.
Student access to the day care facility should be through the school parking lot which stands virtually
empty during the times of drop offand pick up.
Please advise me in writing whether the City will be assisting in enforcement to avoid further illegal
use of the park parking facility. As you know, I have been very patient with the City on this point
and have requested your cooperation on numerous occasions. I feel at this point that you are
ignoringi~), requests
/
!
Very t~rg~~ yours,
SDl-l/dmm
,=)=.2..
~_$?.
~ b J }uly 2. 1998
Honorable Mayor Michael Chang and
City Council, City of Cupertino
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014 -.
Re: Steven Creek Elementary. School
Varian Park
Dear Mayor Chang and City Council Members:
The Cupertino Union School District has developed a commercial day-care center
on its property at the Stevens Creek Elementary School located at J 0300 Ainsworth
Drive in the City of Cupertino. The YMCA is operating the day-care center
operation on a year-round basis. The day-care center operation has never been
brought before the City of Cupertino for review to determine conformity with City
zoning requirements.
Children using the day-care facility and the YMCA providing day-care services'
frequently use V arian Park which is located to the east of my home. People who
drive their automobiles to pick up and drop off children attending the day-care
center come down Varian Way and use the parking lot intended for Varian park.
None of these uses of the park for commercial day-care programs or of parking
intended to serve the park for the day-care center operation has been reviewed or
approved by the City.
The school district has now constructed three buildings on the Stevens Creek
Elementary School site without compliance with the provisions of City of
Cupertino land use and zonin, g regulations. No approvals have been obtained for
the non-school commer~al day-care use which is being conducted by the
Northwest YMCA. Some 80 children are involved in this year-round day-care
center operation. There has been no review or consideration by the City of the
large increase in traffic which uses Varian Way to access the day-care center. The
Honorable Mayor Michael Chang
July 2, 1998
Page 2
present day-care center operation has resulted in at least 300 automobile trips per
day with as many as 500 trips per day on Varian Way. The physical safety of
residents on Varian Way has been endangered by drivers speeding up and down the
street as they deliver children to the day-care center, particularly in the morning.
The day-care center heating, air conditioning units and fans operate throughout the
day and night. Location of this equipment is such that the noise it generates affects
adjacent residential dwellings. Lighting used outside the day-care buildings is more
consistent with commercial use than the quiet residential area and City park which
is adjacent to the Stevens Creek Elementary School. The day-care center is cleaned
nightly, with workers entering via the Varian Park Entrance and using the parking
lot to park their vehicles. Large delivery trucks also consistently deliver food and
· goods to the day-care center, also using the park parking lot, all in violation of the
letter and intent of the Cupertino Municipal Code designed to protect landowners'
adjoining park property by prohibiting use of City parks (including park parking
lots) for non-park purposes.
Because neither the School District nor the YMCA has ever applied for nor
obtained City approvals for a year-round commercial use on school property, and
for the reasons noted above, the present situation stands in violation of City codes.
The City has never approved, nor has the School District supplied, the parking
which would otherwise be required for this use. No parking plans for the day-care
center use have ever been submitted to the City of Cupertino for proper
consideration.
The point of this letter is to request your immediate attention and response to this
ongoing violation of zoning and parking regulations. The residential neighborhood
and landowners adjacent to and near the park are entitled to the protection for
which the City of Cupertino's land use regulations have been devised. Please let
me know?hat action I may expect the City to take.
2'
Very. trfily yours, ~
SDH:mn ' ~_
cc: Mark Hynes, Esq.
'-' ORDINANCE NO. 1837
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMENDING CHAPTER 11.34 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ROADWAY DESIGN FEATURES, SECTION 11.34.010
RELATING TO ROAD BUMP-DEFINITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that
Section 11.34.010 be mended to delete the following:
Section 11.34. 010 Road Bump - Definition.
A bump is a vertical rise in the surface of the pavement of three to three and one-half inches at its
midpoint. The profile is generally circular and twelve feet in length. There is no vertical
displacement start to finish of the road bump. The shape is consistent for the full width of the
pavement except for thc last two feet at each end. The ends will be tapered so that they arc flush
with the roadway at thc edge of the pavement or at thc tip of a gutter.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that
Section 11.34.020 be amended to include the following:
Section 11.34. 010 Road Bump - Definition.
A bump is a vertical rise in thc surface of thc pavement of three to three and one-quarter inches
at its midpoint. Thc profile is generally parabolic and twelve feet in length. There is no vertical
displacement start to finish of thc road bump. Thc shape is consistent for the full width of the
pavement except for the last one foot at each end. The ends will be tapered so that they arc flush
with thc roadway at the edge of the pavement or at the tip of a gutter.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of thc City of Cupertino this 1'~
day of November, 1999 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this
day of ,1999 by the following vote:
Vote Council Members
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
ORDINANCE NO. 1
AN ORDINANCE OF TI-lB CITY COUNCIL OF TMB CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMB~O CHAPTER 11.24.150 OF ThE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE RBLATINO
TO PARKING PROHIBITION, CHAPTER 11.24.160 RELATING TO PARKING
PROHIBITION DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES
OF MARY AVENUE, AND CHAFI~R 11.24.180 RELATING TO DIAGONAL PARKING
ON THE WEST SIDE OF MARY AVENUE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.150 be amended to delete the following:
Street Sides. of Street Portion
Mary Avenue East and North Between Stevens Creek Boulevard
and Homestead Road
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.160 be amended to delete the following:
Street Hours Sides of S~'eet Portion Exceptions
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. South Between a point None
._ $00 feet northerly of
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and a point 1,700 feet south
of Lubec Street.
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. West Between a point None
1,700 feet south Lubec
Street and 400 feet north
of Lubec Street.
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.180 be amended to delete the following:
Street Portion
Mary Avenue Between a point 500 feet northerly of Stevens Creek
Boulevard and a point 1,700 feet southerly of Lubec
Street
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.150 be amended to include the following:
Street Sides of Street Portion
Mary Avenue East Between Stevens Creek Boulevard and a point 340 feet
Northerly
" Mary Avenue East Between a point 440 feet south Lubec Street and
Homestead Road
Ordinance 1838
Page 2
Chapter I 1.24, Section 11.24.160 be amended to include the following:
Street Hours Sides of Street Portion Exceptions
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 5 a.m. East Between a point None
340 feet north of
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and a point 440 south
of Lubec Street
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 5 a.m. West Between a point None
500 feet north of
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and a point 770 feet north
Lubec Street
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.180 be amended to include the following:
Street Portion
Mary Avenue West side between a point 500 feet north of Stevens
Creek Boulevard to a point 380 south of Lubec Street
Mary Avenue West side between a point 430 feet north of Lubec Street
and a point 340 feet northerly
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 1st day Of
November, 1999 and ENACWED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this day of
,1999 by the following vote:
Vote Council Members
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
'-' ORDINANCE NO. 1839
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMENDING CHAPTER 11.34 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ROADWAY DESIGN FEATURES, SECTION 11.34.030
RELATING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF WARRANTS FOR THE INSTALLATION
AND MAINTENANCE OF ROAD BUMPS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that
Section 11.34.030 be mended to delete the following:
Section 11.34. 030 Warrants for the installation and maintenance of road bumps.
A. The street is a neighborhood residential street as defined by the California Vehicle Code
or by City Council actions.
J. The road bump is visible for a distance of two hundred feet.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that
Section 11.34.020 be amended to include the following:
Section 11.34. 030 Warrants for the installation and maintenance of road bumps.
- A. The (local or collector) street is a neighborhood residential street as defined by the
California Vehicle Code or by City Council actions.
J. The road bump is visible for a distance of one hundred-fifty feet.
IC The result of a traffic and engineering survey must indicate a minimum 85%
approach speed of 32 miles per hour.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this Iet
day of November, 1999 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this
day of ,1999 by the following vote:'
Vote Council Members
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
ORDINANCE NO. lg40
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMENDING CHAPTER 11.24.150 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO PARKING PROHIBITION, CHAPTER 11.24.160 RELATING TO PARKING
PROHIBITION DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES
OF MARY AVENUE, AND CHAPTER 11.24.180 RELATING TO DIAGONAL PARKING
ON THE WEST SIDE OF MARY AVENUE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.150 be amended to delete the following:
Street Sides of Street Portion
Mary Avenue East and North Between Stevens Creek Boulevard
and Homestead Road
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.160 be amended to delete the following:
Street Hours Sides of Street Portion Exceptions
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. South Between a point None
$00 feet northerly of
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and a point 1,700 feet south
of Lubec Street.
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. West Between a point None
1,700 feet south Lubec
Street and 400 feet north
of Lubec Street.
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.180 be amended to delete the following:
Street Portion
Mary Avenue Between a point 500 feet northerly of Stevens Creek
Boulevard and a point 1,700 feet southerly of Lubec
Street
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.150 be amended to include the following:
Street Sides of Street Portion
· Mary Avenue East Between Stevens Creek Boulevard and a point 340 feet
Northerly
Mary Avenue East Between a point 440 feet south Lubec Street and
Homestead Road
Ordinance 1840
Page 2
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.160 be amended to include the following:
Street Hours Sides of Street Portion Exceptions
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 5 a.m. East Between a point None
340 feet north of
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and a point 440 south
of Lubec Street
Mary Avenue 2 a.m. to 5 a.m. West Between a point None
500 feet north of
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and a point 770 feet north
Lubec Street
Chapter 11.24, Section 11.24.180 be amended to include the following:
Street Portion
Mary Avenue West side between a point 500 feet. north of Stevens
Creek Boulevard to a point 380 south of Lubec Street
Mary Avenue West side between a point 430 feet north of Lubee Street
and a point 340 feet northerly
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 1st day of '
November, 1999 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this day of
,1999 by the following vote:
Vote Council Members
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: . APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino
ORDINANCE NO. 1841
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMENDING CHAPTER 11.20.020 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF VEHICULAR STOP AND SECTION 11.20.030, ALL
DIRECTIONAL VEHICULAR STOP REQUIRED AT CERTAIN INTERSECTIONS TO
INCLUDE BAHL STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF AINSWORTI'I DRIVE, KENDLE
STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF AINSWORTH DRIVE AND CARTA BLANCA
STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF AiNSWORTH DRIVE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that Section
11.20.020 be mended to include the following:
Section 11.20.020 Vehicular Stop Required at Certain Intersections.
Approaching Street At Any Entrance
Required to Stop Thereof With
Bahl Street Ainsworth Drive
Kendle Street ginsworth Drive
Cam Blanca Street gins'worth Drive
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 1st day of
November, 1999 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this day of
,1999 by the following vote:
Vote Council Members
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Cul~'fino
Cil3, Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
.--. Cupertino, CA 95014
Tel: (408) 777-3212
FAX: (408) 777-3366
CITY 0[: donbi~cupertino.org
CUPEILTINO
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ AGENDA DATE November 15, 1999
Backaround:
At the October 18, 1999, meeting, the city council approved funding of $87,055 for human services
agencies serving Cupertino. The council also directed staff to develop a recommendation on future
human services funding to include: The level of need; the level of funding; and, the appropriate level
of public and private participation.
Summary:
This is a preliminary report to get additional direction from the city council. A thorough review of
human services funding and evaluation of need in Cupertino would require an extensive commitment
from staff, human services agencies, the city council, and potentially the commtmity. Three factors
.-- should be considered prior to taking this on:
1. The complexity and magnitude of human services funding and evaluation of need.
2. The potential unlimited need for additional funding.
3. The need for outside consultant(s) to take on a project of this complexity.
Recommendation:
There are a couple of primary options available to the city council:
1. Retain the current human services funding program based on historical funding levels and the
recommendation of the Human Services Committee. (A copy of funding for the past ten years is
attached.)
2. Develop a detailed scope of services for a thorough analysis of human services funding in
Cupertino.
If the first option is selected, no further action is required. If the second option is selected, it is
recommended that this be discussed when the city council sets the 2000/2001 work program. (January
14th Goals Workshop)
8-/
Prin~ecl on I~n/~l~l Paler
HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING CHART 1990-1999
Agency 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Increase
i!ili. Cu~itlno:bhlO~.DaY S~i~'"":.!i ~:'~00'....':.. '.3~00 3,500. : 3,500" :' ..4,000. ' 4,500 S,000 7,000 9,500 12,000 243%
'Mld~eitlnSula SUpP°rt Network. 4,500 '4,500 4,500 '. 4,500 ': 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,200 5,200 5,500 22%
ii::~i~e~,.:.~d ~ehk. i:i:..:~.:i".~":.i:~.:.i?4~.'::ii:/. 1'4,500 ' 4,500." ..'... 4~00"i':...:..' ::'4,500' 4,s00 4,500" 4,500 4,s00 s,ooo 11%
AGENDA
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Adjourned Meeting
City Hall Council Chamber, 10300 Torte Avenue
Wednesday, November 17, 1999
6:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CANVASS OF VOTES
(a) Resolution No. 99-346: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino Receiving Declaration of Election Results, General Municipal Election,
November 2, 1999."
CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS TO OUTGOING COUNCIL MEMBERS
OATHS OF OFFICE FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS
ELECTION OF MAYOR AND VICE-MAYOR
OATHS OF OFFICE FOR MAYOR AND VICE-MAYOR
COMMENTS BY NEW AND INCUMBENT COUNCIL MEMBERS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any
matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. In most cases, State law
will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on
the agenda.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
AD,IOURNMENT
'Adjourn to Friday, November 19, at 9:00 a.m. for a Council workshop~ The meeting will
be held at the Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21979 San Fernando Avenue.
AGENDA
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Adjourned Meeting
Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21979 San Fernando Avenue
Friday, November 19, 1999
9:00 a.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter
not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit
the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda.
NEW BUSINESS
Council workshop to discuss the following items:
1. Review City Center hotel, apartment and open space concepts.
2. Council/Management staff workshop on transition planning.
CLOSED SESSION