81-014 Williams, Platzek & Mocine Consultants - EIR for the Villas Mariani Project(ATTACHMENT)
ir
City of Cupertino
AGREEMENT NO.
BY THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on the 2nd day of February 19 81
by and between the CITY OF CUPERTINO (Hereinafter referred to as CITY) and
Name (1) Williams, Platzek & Mocine (2)
Address 221 Cgledonia Strppt City sail -sal -it -o, CA Zip94�Phone 132-2892
(Hereinafter referred as CONTRACTOR), in consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree as follows:
CONTRACTOR Shall provide or furnish the following specified services and/or materials:
Final Environmental Impact Report for the Villas — Mariani Project
DELIVERY:
EXHIBITS: The following attached exhibits hereby are made part of this Agreement:
Exhibit A —"Work Program and Proposal"
Exhibit B —"Cost of services to be rendered"
Exhibit C — Description of service rates for additional work
TERMS The services and/or materials furnished under this Agreement shall commence on February 2, 1981
and shall be completed before 46 days from commencement as stated above, or as extended by
both parties hereto
COMPENSATION For the full performance of this Agreement, CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR: $16,275.00 — 80% upon
delivery of the draft; remaining 20% upon certification of the final EIR
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Hold Harmless. Contractor agrees to save and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and
all damage and liability of every nature, including all costs of defending any claim, caused by or arising out of the per-
formance of this agreement. City shall not be liable for acts of Contractor in performing services described herein.
Insurance. Should the City require evidence of insurability Contractor shall file with City a Certificate of Insurance
before commencing any services under this agreement. Said Certificate shall be subject to the approval of City's
Director of Administrative Services.
Non -Discrimination. No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons under this agreement because of
the race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion or sex of such person.
Interest of Contractor. It is understood and agreed that this agreement is not a contract of employment in the sense
that the relation of master and servant exists between City and undersigned. At all times Contractor shall be deemed to
be an independent contractor and Contractor is not authorized to bind the City to any contracts or other obligations in
executing this agreement. Contractor certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest under this
agreement is an officer or employee of City.
Changes. This agreement shall not be assigned or transferred without the written consent of the City. No changes or
variations of any kind are authorized without the written consent of the City.
CONTRACT CO-ORDINATOR and representative for CITY shall be:
Name James H. Sisk Department Planning & Development
Address 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone 252-4505
This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution by CITY, in witness thereof, the parties have executed this
Agreement the day and year first written above.
CONTRACTOR: Ayj
ERTINO:
By \�
Title ing l�irp�tnr
APPROVALS
EXHIBIT A
WORK PROGRAM AND PROPOS
EIR FOR THE VILLAS AT LAKE MARIANI DEVELOPMENT
CUPERTIN O, CALIFORNIA
GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK
1. Collect and review available data, update and revise if
needed, and collect new data where required.
2. Contact affected public agencies, organizations and indi-
viduals.
3. Conduct a field survey of the site and surrounding neigh
borhoods.
4. Describe the environmental setting,.analyze the impacts
of the proposed project, and recommend mitigations.
5. Prepare 3 copies of an Administrative Draft EIR for -staff
review.
6. Print and deliver 40 copies of the Draft EIR and 10 copies
of the Final EIR.
7. Attend up to four public meetings, if required.
SPECIFIC WORK TASKS
Traffic and Circulation
The report will provide a detailed analysis of the project
related impacts and the cumulative effects on local traffic
patterns.
1. Acquire available counts and information from the City:
2. Conduct traffic counts on selected roads at various
"screen lines." Extend to 24 hours where necessary.
I
5. Discuss existing levels of service at key intersections.
Assign future traffic volumes and resulting levels of
service for general growth, project growth, and with
major improvements to 280 Freeway, DeAnza Boulevard and
Homestead Road.
6. Summarize impacts and interpret levels of service for the
public.
7. Provide viable mitigations such as restriping, signal and
directional improvements.
Land Use and Site Plan Analysis
The report will identify the compatibility of the project with
surrounding development and fulfillment of recreational needs..
1. Review applicable development policies, the Cupertino
General Plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance.
2. Discuss the conversion of orchard to residential use.
3. Consider the effects of eliminating the fruit packing
plant on local agriculture and employment.
4. Describe the existing neighborhood, including density and
housing types.
5. Analyze the neighborhood recreational needs and compare
to the project proposal.
6. Evaluate the compatibility of the proposed plan with the
site and existing neighborhood character. Assess the
adequacy of on-site recreational facilities.
7. Discuss the potential for privacy intrusion from the
Villas at Lake Mariani on the adjoining Northpoint resi-
dential community.
8. Recommend site design mitigations which incorporate and
integrate recommended mitigations from this and other
sections
Public Services
The report will focus on sewer capacity and the school system
and include the following;
1. Contact public service agencies. Determine capacity.of
systems.
2
2. Calculate water requirements and sewage generation and
capability of agencies to provide service in conjunction
with anticipated growth.
3. Suggest'water conserving techniques to reduce service
demand.
4. Estimate number of school children and age distribution
from the project. Assess the impacts on local schools.
Provide mitigations as necessary.
5. Determine capability and concerns of other agencies
(police, fire) to serve the site.
Visual Quality and Design
'i
A visual analysis will be conducted to study the effects of
the project on existing neighborhood character and form.
1. Identify City policies on urban design, review subdivision
standards for site planning, and review architectural
drawings for the project.
2. Identify and describe existing visual conditions in the
project area and on the site, including tree cover, views,
buildings and roadways.
3. Prepare photographs of the project site and compare with
sketches of the proposed development. Analyze the effects
on neighborhood form and character.
4. Assess the effects of the project on the adjoining North-
point development in terms of scale, visual intrusion, and
privacy.
5. Evaluate the suitability of the proposed project with City
policies on urban design and aesthetics.
6. Make recommendations to mitigate all possible adverse
visual impacts of developing the site.
Climate and Air Quality
The project will be evaluated with careful attention to air
quality degradation which has occurred in the Santa Clara
Valley. Mitigation measures will be emphasized.
1. Assemble existing climate and air quality information.
2. Prepare analysis based on Air Quality requirements, in
-
eluding wind rose, atmospheric, topographic and seasonal
conditions and,inversion characteristics.
3 _ .
3. Identify Federal, State, Regional, County and City
i standards and regulations for air quality.
4. Evaluate a summary of ambient air quality pollutants and
the effects on sensitive receptors, such as children, the
�I elderly and crops.
5. Compute the site specific and cumulative effects of the
project on air quality.
6. Compare the project with Non -Attainment Plan and discuss
inconsistencies.
7. Recommend mitigations to reduce vehicular travel and air
degradation and alternatives, if appropriate.
Noise Conditions
The short-term effects of removal of the warehouses and site
construction will be evaluated. The report will also consider
the effects of traffic noise from the 280 Freeway on resi-
dential development at the site.
1. Identify applicable noise contours and standards of City
and State; review and compile other relevant data.
2. Define the existing anf future Ldn and L10' L50 and L90
noise levels for the site.
3. Identify the effects of 280 Freeway on future Lake
Mariani residents.
4. Identify the significant short- and long-term impacts,
both on- and off-site for project -related noise.
5. Recommend mitigation measures, such as construction
materials .and building design to reduce residential noise
levels.
Alternatives
Analyze possible alternatives to the proposed project includ-
ing the following:
1. No project - retain existing uses.
2. Lower density development.
3. Other land uses.
i
�t
Study Management and Report Production
Overall responsibility for project completion will be Rudy
Platzek, Partner in Charge. Paul Fenner will act as Project
Manager and coordinate the work of the other members of the
WPM EIR Team.
Reports received from subconsultants will be unified and
interrelated within the report format established by the pro-
ject manager, resulting in a cohesive and complete document.
All report graphics will be executed by WPM staff members to
ensure format consistency and uniform quality.
Reports will be printed back to back to reduce bulk and velo-
bound to facilitate filing and distribution by mail.
5
EXHIBIT B
COST FOR SERVICES TO BE RENDERED
TO PREPARE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON
VILLAS -AT -LAKE MARIANI DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
TOTAL: $16,275
.6
Per -
Gross
for -
Budget Item
Fee
mance
Introduction Section
150
WPM/PF
Project Description
200
WPM/PF
Summary Section
450
WPM/PF
Land Use and Site Plan Analysis
1,950
WPM/PF
Traffic and Circulation
2,800
DG
Air Quality
750
WPM
Noise Conditions
750
Wpol
Public Services
1,000
WZ
Energy Conservation
300
WPM
Visual Quality/Design
1,500
PF
Unavoidable/Cumulative/Growth Inducement Analyses
800
WPM
Alternatives Section
600
WPM/PF
Report Typing and Production
1,000
WPM
Report Mapping and Graphics
1,100
WPM
References and Appendices
100
WPM/PF
Revisions and Responses to Comments
1,000
WPM/PF
Public Meetings
1,000
WPM
Printing and Delivery
825
WPM
3 copies ADEIR @ 25.00 ea = $ 75.00
40 copies DEIR @ 12.50 ea = 500.00
10 copies FEIR @ 15.00 ea = 150.00
pick up and delivery = 100.00
TOTAL: $16,275
.6
EXHIBIT C
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE RATES
FOR ADDITIONAL !CORK
In order to complete the services hereinabove described by
the agreed-upon date and price, no significant modifications
to the development proposal will be allowed unless mutually
agreed to by Williams, Platzek and Mocine and City. Addi-
tional services shall not be performed and Williams, Platzek
and Mocine shall not be entitled to receive any compensation
for additional services unless prior written approval of such
additional services has been given by the City. Any addition-
al services provided by Williams, Platzek and Mocine beyond
those services described herein shall be billed separately,
on a time and material basis as set forth below:
LABOR RATE/HOUR
Principals $50
Senior Planners $40
Associate Planners $25
Assistant Planners $18
Planning Technicians
$15
WILLIAMS, PLATZEK & MOCINE / CITY & REGIONAL PLANNING
221 CALEDONIA STREET SAUSALITO CALIFORNIA 94965 TELEPHONE 4153322892
SYDNEY H. WILLIAMS,A.I.P. RUDOLPH R. PLATZEK, A.I.P. CORWIN R. MOCINE, A.I.P. (EMERITUS)
28 January 1981
James H. Sisk,
Planning Director
City of Cupertino
P.O. Box 580
Cupertino, CA 95015
RE: Villas Mariani EIR Project
Dear Mr. Sisk:
This is to notify you that WPM does not have any past
nor present professional or financial relationship
whatsoever with the Mariani Group of Companies nor
Richardson Nagy Martin, Architects.'
Sincerely,
Rud ph R. latzek
RRP:ni
Site Developments Plans Master Plans Specific Plans General Plans
Environmental Assessments Land Use Capability Plans Intergovernmental Relations