The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 09-20-99 AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL -'REGULAR MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10300 Tone Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Monday, September 20, 1999 6:45 p;m. CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS & PRESENTATIONS POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS : OR~kL COMMUNICATIONS : This portion of thc meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff, or a member of the public, it is requested that items 1 through 12 be acted on simultaneously. 1. Minutes: September 7, 1999 regular meeting. : 2. Accounts payable: (a) September 3, 1999, Resolution No. 99-267 Co) September 10, 1999, Resolution No. 99-268 3. Payroll: September 3, 1999, Resolution No. 99-269 4. Approving destruction of certain records, Resolution No. 99-270. 5. Recommendation from Telecommunications Commi~ion to approve public af.~ess grallL 6. Authorizing amendment to Resolution No. 99-209 which authorized execution of an agreement for -- payment of costs between the city, the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency, and JG Cupertino LLC, Resolution No. 99-271. Page 2 Cupertino City' Council & September 20, 1999 Cupertino Redevelopment Center 7. Declaring intent to conduct a public heating concerning a nuisance on parcel 369-24-048, 862 Bette Avenue, weeds and accumulation of garbage and refuse in front and side yards, Resolution No. 99-272. 8.' Acceptance of city projects performed under contract: Medians and Roadsides, Landscape Improvements at Various.Locatious, Project 98-108 (Robert A. Bothman, Inc.). 9. Award of contract for Interstate Route 280 at Wolfe Road Interchange Traffic Safety Improvement Project. 10. Designation of permit parking: (a) Byrne Avenue .between McClellan Road and San Fernando Avenue, Resolution No. 99- 273 (b) Santa Teresa Drive between Hyannisport Drive and Columbus Avenue, Resolution No. 99- 274 11. Accepting grant of easement for storm drain purposes from First Baptist Church of Cupertino, 105.25 Miller Avenue, APN 369-16-001, R~olufion No. 99-275. 12. Accepting quitclaim deed from the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose, 22555 Cristo Rey Drive, Los Altos, APN 342-63-002, 005, Re~olution No. 99-276. ITEMS REMOVED FROM ~ CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Public hearing to consider abating public nuisances (inoperable vehicle, substandard roof) at 19337 Phil Lane, Lida Rivera, R~olution No. 99-277. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 14. Tentative map to subdivide a 14,661 sq. fl. parcel into 7 lots for an approved townhouse development, 7359 Rainbow Drive, Applications 3-TM-99, 14-EA-99, APN 362-31-029, Judy Chen. A Negative Declaration i~ recommended, and ~ item is recommended for approval. Actions to be taken: 1. Grant Negative Declaration 2. Approve applications per Planning Commission R~olution No. 5069, modify, or deny UNFINISHED BUSINESS ' NEW BUSINESS September 20, 1999 Cupertino City Council & Page 3 Redevelopment C~enter ORDINANCES 15. Second readings and enactments: (a) Ordinance 1833 - "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 16.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Electronic Security Gates" (b) Ordinance 1835 - "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 14.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Heritage and Specimen Trees~' STAFF REPORTS .. COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Dean: Cupertino Audit Committee Economic'Development Team- Alternate Environmental Review Committee ' Legislative Review Committee .. Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedne.~s Commissi°n Santa Clara County Solid Waste Committee West Valley Mayor~ and City Managers - Vice-Mayor Statton: " Association of Bay Area Governments - Alternate Economic Development Team Public Dialog Liaison Santa Clara County Committee on I-Io~illg and Community Development Block Grant Program - Alternate .. Santa Clara County Library ]PA Board Sister City Committee - Toyolmwa West Valley Mayor~ and City Managers - Alternate Councilmember Bumott: Environmental Review Committee - Alternate Libral'y Expall~ion CommiRoo North Central and Northwest Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee Santa Clara County Cities Assodation ~tativo, ABA(] Board of Ditmton Santa Clalll County Commlttoo on Housing and Community Block Grant Program Santa Clara County Library JPA Board - Alternate Santa Clara County Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee Sallta Clara Valley Water Commisgion Senior Center Expansion Design Committee - Councilmember Chang: Association of Bay Ama Governments Joint Venture Silicon Valley Public Sector Round Table - Alternate Leadership Cupertino Page 4 Cupertino City Council & September 20, 1999 Cupertino Redevelopment Center Legislative Review Committee Library Expansion Committee Public Dialog Liaison Santa Clara County Cities Association ' Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission - Alternate Councilmember James: Cupertino Audit Committee Economic Development Team Leadership Cupertino Santa Clara County Cities Association - Alternate Santa Clara County Drug and Alcohol Board Senior Center Expansion Design Committee CLOSED SESSION Initiating litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(c): Patrick Kwok, quo warranto. ADJOURNMENT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY .MEETING ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS & PRESENTATIONS wva N COMMUmCATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL OF ~S 1. Approval of minutes of the August 16, 1999, regular meeting. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 2. Authorizing amendment to Resolution No. RA-99-08, which authorized execution of an agreement for payment of costs between the Agency, the City of Cupez~o, and JG Cupertino LLC, Resolution No. RA-99-10. lVHNUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, September 7, 1999 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:50 p.m. Mayor Dean called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led.the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Wally Dean, Vice-Mayor $ohn Statton, and Council members Don Burnett, and Michael Chang. Council members absent: Sandra James. Staff present: Acting City Manager Bert Viskovich, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Bob Cowan, Parks and Recreation Director Steve Dowling, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, Human Resources Officer Bill Woska, and City. Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS Councilmember Don Bumett said that September 13, 1899, was the first automobile fatality. Since that time over 30 million people have been killed by automobiles. He said the city is sponsoring a workshop on walkable and rideable communities. It will be at the Quinlan Community center on Tuesday, October 19 from 8 a.m.to 4:30 p.m., and it is open to the public. POSTPONEMENTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Ms. Carol Gulley, 10368 Beardon Dr., discussed the problem of abandoned shopping carts in her neighborhood, and distributed photographs from last week as well as a viewgraph. She asked what laws may have been violated and how people who break those laws might be prosecuted. The council members agreed that this is an area of great concern. Viskovich said that staff was working closely with the various stores, and people should call 777-3354 to report abandoned ' carts so that staff could contact the store owner directly. Mr. Albert Hoffman said that he wished to remember Mr. Hemy Singleton, who had passed away. Mr. Singleton was one of the original board members at Apple Computers. CONSENT CALENDAR Chang moved to approve the items on the consent calendar as presented. Burnett seconded and the motion carried 4-0, with/ames absent. September 7, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 2 1. Monthly Treasurer's and Budget Report- July 1999. 2. Accounts payable: (a) August 13, 1999, Resolution No. 99-264 (b) August 20, 1999, Resolution No. 99-256 (c) August 27, 1999, Resolution No. 99-257 3. Payroll - August 20, 1999, Resolution No. 99-258. 4. Approval ofthe minutes of the regular meeting of August 16, 1999. 5. Acceptance of municipal improvements: Nasrollah & Nahid Kazemi, 22287 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 326-50-034. 6. Improvement Agreements: (a) Samuel Liang & Sandra B. Liang, 19010 Barnhart Ave., APN 375-37-041, Resolution No. 99-259 (b) Aric Gilbrecht, 22436 Palm AVe., APN 357-04-013, Resolution No. 99-260 7. Grants of Easement, Roadway: (a) Cupertino Village Associates H, LLC, SW Comer Homestead ~ Wolfe, Resolution No. 99-261 (b) Aric Gilbrecht, 22436 Palm Ave., APN 357-04-013, Resolution No. 99-262 8. Quitclaim Deed, Aric Gilbrecht, 22436 Palm Ave., APN 357-04-013, Resolution No. 99- 263. 9. Authorizing execution of Fifth Amendment to the Agreement between Santa Clara County and the City of Cupertino for Abatement of Weeds, Resolution No. 99-265. 10. Requests for fee waiver: (a) Monta Vista High School varsity football team for reserving the barbecue site located behind Quinlan Community Center at Memorial Park on Thursday, October 7 and October 14, Friday, October 29, and Thursday, November 4. (b) Iranian Federated Woman's Club and Payvand Cultural School for the Third Annual Iranian Art and Cul.mral Event scheduled on Sunday, October 10, at Quinlan Community Center. 11. Review of application for Alcoholic Beverage Control license for Albertsons Inc., 10425 De Anza Boulevard. Vote Councilmembers Ayes: Bumett, Chang, Dean, and Statton Noes: None. Absent: James Abstain: None. September 7, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 3 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR- None PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Reconsideration of appeals, Application 4-ASA-99 - Public hearing to reconsider appeals filed by Mr. Erh-Kong and Ms. Ding-Wei Chieh and Dr. Nancy and Mr. Henry Adelman. The application requested architectural and site approval to allow the construction of first and second story additions to an existing one-story duplex located at 10333 Degas Court. (Petition for rehearing filed by the Law Offices of Owen Byrd - Adelman's request continuation to September 20, 1999.) The City Attorney said the appellant asked for a continuance to September 20, and that the stop-work order be re-established. He noted that if the continuance is granted, it should be until such time as the Community Development Director will be available, and the earliest date would be November 1. The Adelman's daughter explained that her parents were out of town, 'and the continuance to November 1 was acceptable. Bumett moved to continue this item to November l, and to not reissue the stop-work order. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with James absent. 13. Electronic Security Gates - Public hearing to consider a General Plan Amendment to policies 2-33 and 6-17 .regarding discouraging electwnic security gates, and an amendment to Chapter 16.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code regarding prohibition of security gates in non-single family residential .parcels. A Negative Declaration is recommended and this item is recommended for approval. (Continued from August 16 meeting.) (a) Resolution adopting general plan amendment, Resolution No. 99-255 (b) First reading of Ord. 1833: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Ch~ter 16.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Electronic Security' Gates" Bumett moved to grant a Negative Declaration and approve the project per Planning Commission Resolution No. 5053, with the following amendment: Change the last bullet of the resolution to read" The elec4ronic gates are needed for demonstrated security reasons." Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with James absent. The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Burnett moved and Chang seconded to read the ordinance by title only; and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried 4-0 with James absent. September 7, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 4 14. Animal control - Public hearing regarding compliance with AB 1482 (Alquist), holding periods for animal prior to euthaniT.~tion: (a) Electing to comply with certain animal holding periods set forth under state law in effect on Sune 30, 1999, pursuant to thc terms of AB 1482 (Alquist) holding periods set forth in Chapter 752 of Statues of 1998 of the State of California, and authorizing the city manager to take any actions to effect this election and the actions contemplated under this resolution, Resolution No. 99-266. Ms. Anna Polman-Black asked if something can be done about the large number of feral cats on Gardena Drive near Highway 280. Woska said that he would contact the Humane Society to see if they could assist with the problem. Statton moved to adopt Resolution No. 99-266. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0, with James absent. 15. Tree Ordinance - Public hearing to consider amending Chapter 14.18: (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1835:- "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 14.18 of the CupertinO Municipal Code Regarding Heritage and Specimen Trees." Community Development Director Bob Cowan explained that the Planning Commission recommended preservation of more than oak trees in order to improve the quality of thc streetscape, particularly in residential areas. He reviewed the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and said that if Council adds trees to the list of pwtecied species, staff will send out a flyer with drawings illustrating the' additions to the list. Bumett said he was opposed to including the Coast Redwood because of its large size and shallow roots, and the California Pepper because it is brittle and creates a lot of litter. The public hearing was opened. There were no speakers, and the hearing was closed. Bumett moved to grant a Negative Declaration, and to accept the recommendations set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 5065, with the exception of the Coast Redwood and California Pepper. The trees to be added to the list will be the California Buckeye, the Big Leaf maple, the Deodar Cedar, and the Blue Atlas Cedar. Chang seconded and thc motion carried 4-0, with Jam~s absent. The City Clerk read the title of ordinance No. 1835. Bumett moved and Statton seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried 4-0 with lames absent. 16. Public hearing to consider elimination of the turning restrictions at Tone Avenue and Rodrigues Avenue. Negative Declaration recommended. Public Works Director Bert Viskovich reviewed the staff report and said that staff recommended that the turning restriction be removed and the situation be monitored to see if there is a substantial adverse impact. September 7, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 5 Ms. Paige Kirtle, 10224 Danube Drive, Mr. Howard Ashmore, 10224 Danube Drive, and Mr. Albert Hoffinan, 10209 Nile Drive, all spoke in favor of the removal of the turning restriction. Station remarked that it would also reduce the number of U-tums on Tone Avenue. Station moved to adopt a Negative Declaration, and to direct staff to remove the turning restriction. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with lames absent. Bumeti moved to approve the staff recommendation to remove the restriction, and if it is found that a substantial impact has been created., the City Council may consider re- installing the restriction. Statton seconded and the motion carried 4-0. PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None UNHNISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS 17. Parking prohibition, on the east side of Stevens Canyon Road, between McClellan and St. Andrews. Enactment of Urgency Ordinance No. 1836, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending Chapter 11.24.150 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, Parking Prohibition Along Certain Streets, East Side of Stevens Canyon - Road Between McClellan Road and St. Andrews Avenue and Declaring the Urgency Thereof." Public Works Director Bert Viskovich reviewed the staff report and said this ordnance was to prevent track drivers from parking their tracks on the street, which was causing a line of sight pwblem for drivers. The City Clerk read the title of urgency ordinance No. 1836. Bumett moved and Station seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the reading thereof. Motion carded 4-0 with James absent. Bumett moved and Chang seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1836. Motion carried 5-0. ORDINANCES 18. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1834: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Approving an Amendment to Title 19, Chapter 19.28 Single Family Ordinance of the Cupertino Municipal Code." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumeti moved and Station seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion carried 4-0 with lames absent. Bumeti moved and Statton seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1834. Motion carried 4-0 with lames absent. September 7, 1999 C, upertino City Council Page 6 STAFF REPORTS Parks and Recreation Director Steve Dowling said that council had received a letter from residents on Christianson regarding impacts from the recent Art & Wine festival held near the Quinlan center. He said the Chamber of Commerce has been very supportive, and will meet with him to identify the impacts. Recommendations will be taken to the Parks and Recreation Commission and then to City Council. In response to Burnett's comments about vendor traffic on the site, Dowling said that staff has been meeting with the Sheriff's department, and they will have to take a more organized and punitive approach to controlling the vehicles that are used for set-up and tear-down. Statton asked that the Parks and Recreation Commission consider changes to the front of the park to improve its functionality for such events, as well as considering other, suitable sites. He suggested that the Compaq Computer site may be able to include an area for community events. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Chang said he facilitated a meeting last week of the Leadership Cupertino program. They are now recruiting for class members for this program as well as a youth 'leadership program. Councilmember Bumett said the Walkable Communities workshop would be useful information for individuals interested in the leadership program. Bumett also discussed inequities in water conservation from one community to another, and said he would be pursuing that in his various roles in thc water district. CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT At 7:36 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Kimberly Smith City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 99-267 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 3, 1999 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, thc said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20thday of September ,1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 09/02/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between #08/30/1999' and "09/03/1999" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAHES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 6308540 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -4.50 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108501 PE~I'Y CASH REI~d~URSEME 0.00 -37.88 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108501 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -6.46 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108501 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMB 0.00 -13.86 1020 571458 V 0~/20/99 148 CASH 1108407 PETTY CASH REIMBUNSEME 0.00 -31.02 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -6.60 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108501 PETI'Y CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -2.70 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -2.00 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASE 5708510 PETTY CASH RBIMBURSEME 0,00 -16.71 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 6308540 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 -13,77 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108501 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -2.52 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -2.98 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108407 PETTY CASH REIWd~UNSFJ4E 0.00 -16.94 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108602 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 -16.35 1020 571458 V 08/20/99 148 CASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REIMBUNSEME 0.00 -17.30 TOTA~CHECK 0.00 -191.59 1020 571733 08/30/99 197 CUPERTINO TO~N CENTER 1101500 RENT 0,00 2894,00 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 'CASH 1108501 PETTY CASH REIMBUNSEME 0.00 6,46 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 5708510 PETTY CASH REIMBUNSEME 0,00 16.71 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108501 P~H-r~ CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108407 PETTY CASH REINBURSEME 0,00 3, 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 C. ASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REINBURSSME 0,00 2,98 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108201 P~-r~'~ CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 2,00 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108501 P~'rr~ CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 2.70 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 6308540 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 4,S0 1020 S71734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108602 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 16.35 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 6308540 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 13,77 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REINBURSEME 0,00 17,30 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108501 P=A-~'f CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 37,88 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108201 PETTY CASH REIMBUNSEME 0,00 6,60 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108407 PETTY CASH REINBUNSENE 0,00 16,94 1020 571734 08/30/99 148 CASH 1108501 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 13,86 TOTAL CHECK 0,00 191,59 1020 571735 09/03/99 918 ALAMO WORI~D TRAVELAND T 5506549 GRAPE ESCAPE BAh DUE 0,00 50.00 1020 571736 09/03/99 918 ~ WORLD TRAVSh ~ T 5506549 RIVER BARGING 10/20-27 0,00 47416,00. 1020 571737 09/03/99 1377 BAY AREA DISTRIBUTING CO 6308540 SUPPHIES 0.00 252,96 1020 571738 09/03/99 92 BEST OF COUPONS 5706450 DIRECT MAI~ ADVERTISIN 0,00 2000,00 1020 571739 09/03/99 873 DON BURNETT 1101000 NONTHHY INTERNET ACCES 0,00 60,00 1020 571740 09/03/99 M CAPIO 1101201 · MID4BERSHIP 0,00 125,00 1020 571741 09/03/99 147 CASH 5506549 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 12~" 1020 571741 09/03/99 147 CASH 5506549 PETTY CASH REIMBUNSEME 0,00 1020 571741 09/03/99 147 CASH 5506549 PS't~'~ CASH REIMBURSENE 0,00 12,~0 RUN DATE 09/02/99 TIM~ 14:53:23 - FINA~CZAL ACCOUNTING 09/02/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND :ION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_da~e between "08/30/1999" and "09/03/1999" FUND - 110 - GENERAl, FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... BABES TAX At4OUNT 1020 571741 09/03/99 147 CASH 5506549 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 37.10 1020 571741 09/03/99 147 CASH S506549 PETTY CASH REINBURSE~4E 0.00 9.19 1020 571741 09/03/99 147 CASH 5506549 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 10.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 198.70 1020 571742 09/03/99 1431 CAYOT, LINDA 5806249 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 .107.47 1020 571743 09/03/99 823 MICHAEL CHANG 1101000 MONTHLY INTERNET ACCES 0.00 60.00 1020 571744 09/03/99 M CHURCH, MENNONITE 110 R~FUND DEPOSIT R#3619 0.00 100.00 1020 571745 09/03/99 841 ROBERT COWAN . 1107200 REINBURSEMENT 0.00 25.06 1020 571745 09/03/99 841 ROBERT COriAN 1107501 REIMBURSID4F/qT 0.00 25.05 1020 571745 09/03/99 841 ROBERT COWAN 1108001 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 25.06 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 75.17 1020 571746 09/03/99 M CSMFO 1104000 BUDGET ANAWRD FEE 0.00 25.00 1020 571747 09/03/99 1430 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY 2708405 TITAN POWERLINER 449.79 6653.79 1020 571748 09/03/99 242 gMPhOYNENT DEVEL DEFT 110 STATE WITHHOI~)ING 8/29 0.00 13797.60 ~ 571749 09/03/99 243 ENPLOYNENT DEVEhOPMENT 110 STATE DISABILITY 8/29/ 0.00 224.48 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELESS 1108504 CEr.~.ULAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 95.17 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELESS 1107503 CELLUI~ PHONE SERVICE 0.00 20.16 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRELSSS 1108504 CELIJJLAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 128.72 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELESS 1108501 CEI~ PHONE SERVICE 0.00 87.60 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRELESS 1107503 CEI/iILAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 56.50 1020 571750 '09/03/99 310 GT~ WIRELESS 1108602 CELIAIIJ~R PHONE SERVICE 0.00 24.11 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTg WIREI~S 1108201 CE~.~.ULAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 83.00 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE WIRELESS 1108201 CEIJ~JI2~R PHONE SERVICE 0.00 27.89 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELRSS 1107503 CEI~ PHONg SERVICE 0.00 70.52 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 Gig NIREI~S 1107503 CEllULAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 40.35 1020- 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIHELESS 1107503 CEI~JLAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 55.47 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRE~BSS 5208003 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 ~2.32 ' 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIREL~SS 1108102 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 317.69 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELBSS 1108102 CELIAU, aAR PHOBE SERVICE 0.00 43.18 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 ~T~ NII~ 1108505 CELLULAR PHON~ SERVICE 0.00 27.89 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRRI~S 1108101 CHI~&II~ PHONE SENVICE 0.00 56.50 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTg #IRELESS 6104800 ~ PHONE SERVICS 0.00 263.69 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTS WIREI~ESS 6104800 CEIJ~JLAR PHONE SERVICg 0.00 169.31 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GT~ NIRghBSS 5108706 CELLULAR PHONE SERVlCg 0.00 10.58 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELESS 1108504 CEI~U~ PHONE SERVICE 0.00 71.45 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRELgSS 1107501 CEIJ~ULAR PHOiqE SERVICE 0.00 27.89 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE WIRELESS 1107501 CEIJ~JLAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 122.70 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELESS 1108102 CE~ PHO~IE SERVICE 0.00 110.59 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRELSSS 1107503 CELIA~ PHONE SERVICE 0.00 26.91 1020 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRgI~S 1107503 CELIA~ PH(H~R SERVICE 0.00 27.89 I 571750 09/03/99 310 GTE #IRELESS 1108501 CEI~I~JI~%R PHONE SERVICE 0.00 34.37 I S71750 09/03/99 310 GTE NIRELESS 1107503 CEIJ~J'I~R PHONE SERVICE 0.00 89.74 RUN DATE 09/02/99 TINg 14:53:24 - FII~IAL ACCO~IN(I 09f02/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between ~08/30/1999m and ~09/03/1999# " FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCHIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2112.19 1020 571751 09/03/99 1235 H]GHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 110 LIFE & AD&D . 0.00 6046.30 1020 571751 09/03/99 1235 HIGi~qARK LXFE INSURANCE 110 LIFE & AD&D 0.00 5967.80 1020 571751 09/03/99 1235 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 6414570 LTD 0.00 5145.58 1020 571751 09/03/99 1235 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 6414570 LTD 0.00 5141.15 1020 571751 09/03/99 1235 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 6414570 LTD 0.00 5105.67 1020 571751 09/03/99 1235 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 110 LIFE & AD&D 0.00 6054.36 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 33480.86 1020 571752 09/03/99 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 0.00 .6613.75 1020 571753 09/03/99 857 SANDRA JAMES 1101000 MONTHLY INTERNET ACCES 0.00 60.00 1020 571754 09/03/99 M JIMENEZo MARIA 1104510 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 295.90 1020 571755 09/03/99 M KEZJuY GORDON DEVELOEHENT 110 REFUND OF 45% BOND 0.00 2250.00 1020 571756 09/03/99 807 CHARLES KILIAN 1101500 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 472.85 1020 571757 09/03/99 M MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS 110 REFUND OF 45% BOND 0.00 7425.00 1020 571758 09/03/99 494 OFFXCE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500 FINANCE CHARGE 0.00 1020 571758 09/03/99 494 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500 SUPPLIES 0.00 56.16 1020 571758 09/03/99 494 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500 SUPPLIES 0.00 274.45 TOTAl, CHECK ~ 0.00 334.15 1020 571759 09/03/99 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 UNION DUES 0.00 378.00 1020 571760 09/03/99 833 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 305.65 1020 571760 09/03/99 033 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 579.37 1920 571760 09/03/99 833 P E R S' 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 20707.42 1020 571760 09/03/99 833 P E R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 * 91.79 1020 571760 09/03/99 833 P g R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 67.68 1020 571760 09/03/99 833 P g R S 110 RETIREMENT 0.00 2804.91 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 24556.82 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PBlqlNSUId% BLUEPRINT 110 BLUELINE PRINTS #11151 0.00 06.71 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 1108101 BLUELINE PRINTS 0.00 26.51 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 BLUELINg PRINTS #11151 0.00 44,11 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 116.93 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PSNINSUIa~BLUEPRINT 110 BLUELINS PRINTS #11194 0.00 301,22 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PENINSULA BLUBPRINT 110 BlUShINg PRINTS #11549 0.00 107,00 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 4209524 BIAIELINE PRINTS 0.00 207.39 1020 571761 09/03/99 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 66,45 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 956.32 1020 571762 09/03/99 533 PEltS LOitK~ TERM CARE PROG 110 LONG TEEM CARE 0.00 456.45 1020 571763 09/03/99 844 ROTARY 1106500 LUNCHF, S/D SNOW 0.00 1020 571763 09/03/99 844 ROTARY 1104001 GUESTS 0.00 72.U0 RUN DATE 09/02/99 TIME 14:53:25 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 09/02/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO, PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 5/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSENENT FUND ICl'ION CRITERIA: tranEacC.trans_date between ~08/30/1999' and '09/03/1999" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571763 09/03/99 844 ROTARY 1101500 LUNCHES/C KILHIAIq 0.00 72.00 1020 571763 09/03/99 844 ROTARY 1101200 I.,UNCHES/D ERONN 0.00 48.00 1020 571763 09/03/99 844 ROTARY 1101000 $ JA~4ES & J STATTON 9.00 240.00 1020 571763 09/03/99 844 ROTARY 1104000 LUNCHES/C ATNOOD 0.00 ?2.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 624.00 1020 571764 09/03/99 626 SANTA CHARA CO DEPT OF R 1102100 CITATIONS' 0.00 2685.00 1020 571764 09/03/99 626 SANTA CLARA CO DEPT OF R 1102100 CITATIONS 0.00 1990.00 1020 571764 09/03/99 626 SAI~FA CLd~RA CO DEFT OF R 1102100 CITATIONS 0.00 2790.00 TOTAl, CHECK 0.00 7465.00 1020 571765 09/03/99 1488 SEARS 1108503 SUPPLIES 0.00 226.35 1020 571765 09/03/99 1488 SEARS 1108503 SUPPLIES 0.00 33.54 TOTAl, CHECK 0.00 259.89 1020 571766 09/03/99 677 · STATE SI'REST BANK & TRUE 110 DEFERRED COMPENSATION' 0.00 538.68 1020 571767 09/03/99 698 TALH¥'S ENTERPRISES 2708404 INSTAI~ ISLAND 0.00 2100.00 1020 571767 09/03/99'698 TAI~Y*S ENTERPRISES 2709435 INSTALL ISLAND 0.00 500°00 TOTA~CHECK 0.00 2600.00 1.~0 571768 09/03/99 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 SUPPLIES 20.36 26?.20 J 571769 09/03/99 730 UNITED STATES POSTAl, EER 1104310 POSTAGE BY'PHONE 0.00 40000.00 1020 571770 09/03/99 750 VISION SERVICR PI, AN 110 VISION INSURANCE 0.00 1848.70 1020 571771 09/03/99 302 #ASHING'I'ON MUTUA~ 110 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 0.00 19578.35 1020 571772 09/02/99 1491 AIqY MOUNTAIN 2708405 SUPPLIES 0.00 349.75 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASH 1103300 PETTY CASE REII~UR,qEME 0.00 28.65 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 .. CASE 1104001 PETTY CASH REINI~URSENE 0.00 24.90 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASH 1104520 Pa-rr~ CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 36.37 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASE 1106100 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0,00 28.12 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASH 1104530 P~-i-rY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 ~7.12 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASE 1107503 PETTY CASH REII~URSEME 0,00 20.00 1020' 574001 09/01/99 149 CASH 1104000 PETTY CASH RRIMBUR~EME 0,00 25.50 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASH 1106100 PETTY CASH REINBUR~ENE 0.00 39.31 1020 574001 09/01/99 149 CASE 1104000 PETTY CASH REINBUR~EME 0.00 75.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 304.97 TOTAL CASE ACCOUNT 470.15 227269.00 TOTAL FUND 470.15 227269,00 TOTAL REPORT 470.15 227269.00 RUN DATE 09/02/99 TIME 14:53:25 - FINANCIAL ACCOIJ~iTxi~G g.~ RESOLUTION NO. 99-268 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE 1N THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEKEINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEHBER 10, 1999 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set fo~h in Exllibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Servic~ PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City council of the City of Cupertino this day of ,1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 49/10/99 CITY OF cuPgRTINO PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ct&ns_dace between "09/07/1999" and "09/10/1999" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571773 09/09/99 727 U S POSTMASTER 5208003 POSTAGE/SELF-MAILER 0.00 150.00 1020 571774 09/10/99 1503 A TO Z TREE NURSERY 1108407 SUPPLIES 0.00 287.79 1020 571774 09/10/99 1503 A TO Z TREE NURSERY 1108407 SUPPLIES 0.00 24.35 TOTAL. CHECK 0.00 312.14 1020 571775 09/10/99 M A.A. & C.H.R. 1100000 REFUND BUSINESS LICENS 0.00 86.00 1020 571776 09/10/99 1394 AAA REFRIGERATION' SERVIC 1108504 . Id~BOR & SUPPLIES 0.00 65.00 1020 571776 09/10/99 1394 AAA REFRIGERATION SERVIC 1108504 LABOR a SUPPLIES 0.00 95.04 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 160.04 1020 571777 09/10/99 13 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 5606640 PORTABLE TOILETS 8/99 7.34 175.35 1020 571778 09/10/99 M ADAMS, VERA 5500000 TRIP REFUND/DIFFERENCE 0.00 55.00 1020 571779 09/10/99 1504 AG V~/TI~JRE TOURS 5506549 TRIP DEPOSIT 9/23/99 0.00 500.00 1020 5~1780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108501 SUPPLIES 2.21 29.69 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 2708405 SUPPLIES 4.43 59.38 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108303 SUPPLIES 4.44 S9.40 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108503 SUPPLIES 1.52 21.23 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 6308540 S~PP~IES 1.52 ~' ~3 1020 571780 ' 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108314 SUPPLIES 0.76 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108314 SUPPLIES 2.21 2=.69 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 6308540 SUPPLIES 4.43 S9.38 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108503 SUPPLIES 4.43 59.38 1020 571760 09/10/99 28 AIRC4~S 1108501 SUPPLIES 0.76 10.62 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 1108303 SUPPLIES 1.53 21.25 1020 571780 09/10/99 28 AIRGAS 2708405 SUPPLIES 1.52 21.23 TOTAL CH~CK 29.78 403.10 1020 571781 09/10/99 29 LYNNEAITKEN 58064~9 RECRRATION FROGW b..00 92.00 lo2o 571782 O9/lO/99 36 )T.~N'S PRESS CLZPPIN~ 1103300 P~.SS CLIPPING 8/99 0.00 36.00 1020 571783 09/10/99 M ALLIANCE FOR COf~q~ZTY M 1101031 CONFERENCE 0.00 100.00 1020 S71783 09/10/99 M ALLIANCE FOR COIO~u~ITY M 1101Q31 COHFERENCE 0.00 100.00 1020 S71783 09/10/99 M ALLIANCE FOR C(]e~4~HITY M 1101031 C0ti~I~.ENCE 0.00 100.00 1020 571783 09/10/99 M AL~IANC~ FO~,~I~ .~£ M 1101031 Cu~Ju(BNCE 0.00 100.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 400.00 1020 571784 09/10/99 lS0S AT~'A~TO STORES 8308540 SUPPLIES '0.00 38.84 1020 571785 09/10/99 888 ALOHA POOL MAXNTEHANCE X 5708SX0 M0~AILY MAINTRNANCE 8/ 0.00 342.80 1020 571786 09/10/99 40 ALTEC XNDUSTRXES XNC. 6309820 ALTRCK ~ODEL LEIXI-S5 7682.14 100812.14 1020 571786 09/10/99 40 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 188.94 TOTAL CHECE 7683.14 101001.08 1020 571787 09/10/99 45 AM~RZCAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 2708405 bWJPPL~ES 0.00 4' ~ DATE 09/10/99 T'rM~ 08:55:52 - PZNANC'rAL ACCOUNTTNG 09/10/99 CITY OF CUPER?XNO PAG£ ACCOI~TING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND 8ELI~CTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between '09/07/1999' and '09/10/1999' FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCTCHECKNO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ....... . ...... FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAL~S TAX AMOUNT 1020 $71787 09/10/99 45 /M~RICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 2708405 .SUPPLIES 0.00 228.25 TOTAL CH~CK 0.00 650.43 1020 571788 09/10/99 57 AR$~4AHK 5506549 COFFEE SUPPLIES 0.00 97.45 1020 571788 ~9/10/99 57 AR3d~K 1104510 ~MPLOY~E COFFEE 0.00 361.08 TOTAL OI~CK 0.00 458.53 1020 571789 09/10/99 M ASSN FOR N0~ IN COt~ 1103300 ~ERSHIP I~S O.00 140.00 1020 571790 09/10/99 67 AUTOt4ATIC RAIN CO~4PAHY 1108314 SUPPLIES 45.56 597.89 1020 571790 09/10/99 67 J~TIC RAIN COMPANY 1108407 SUPPLIES 143.23 1879.41 1020 571790 09/10/99 67 AI~TIC RAIN C(HRPAHY 1108407 SUPPLIES 0.06 0.89 T~3TALC/~CK 188.85 2478.19 1020 571791 09/10/99 71 B & R ICE CREAM DZST 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 526.28 1020 571792 09/10/99 96 BLACK MTSPRINGWATER 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 95.80 1020 571793 09/10/99 98 BLAINETEC~SERVICE INC 6308540 FIELD SERVICES 0.00 155.00 1020 571794 09/10/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO COJ4R~ICATI 1108407 GP 300 MOTOROLA 51.49 675.66 1020 571794 09/10/99'106 BRIDGE RADIO C0JO4~HICATI 1108501 GP 300 MOTOROLA 51.49 675.66 1~2~ 571794 09/10/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO COI~ICATI 1108507 GP 300 MOTOROLA 51.49 675.64 571794 09/10/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO C~ICAT! 1108303 GP 300 MOTOROLA 51.51 675.68 1. . 571794 09/10/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO COI~qL~JICATI [108504 GP 300 MOTOROLA 51.49 875.66 1020 571794 09/10/99 106 BRIDGE RADIO C~ICAT! 1108S03 GP 300 MOTOROLA 51.49 675.66 TOTAL CHECR 308.96 4053.96 1020 571795 09/10/99 M BROCKETT, LISA 110 REFT~ DEPOSIT 8/7/99 0.00 100.00 1020 571796 09/10/99 M CACEO 1104530 SEMINAR 10/6-10/8/99 0.00 225.00 1020. 571796 09/10/99 M C]tCBO 1104530 SEMINAR 10/6-10/8/99 0.00 225.00 1020 571796 09/10/99 M CACEO 1104530 SEMINAR 10/6-10/8/99 0.00 225.00 TOTAl, C'dECK 0.00 6?5.00 1020 571797 09/10/99 130 CJtLiFORNIA PARK AHDRECR 1101200 II~t~ERSHIP/LLAGERGREN 0.00 ?0.00 1020 S71798 09/10/99 1145 CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & D 1108101 SUPPLIES 0.00 269.8~ 1020 571799 09/10/99 1506 C~d4PH0~ 1108501 SUPPLIES 0.00 ?8.49 1020 S71800 09/10/99 1476 CR~ DESIGHGRO~P. 110 SERVICES/ RCPT 3983 0.00 332.76 1020 571801 09/10/99 142 CARTER INlY~STRIES INC 6308540 LABOR & PARTS 0.00 487.59 1020 571802 09/10/99 143 C~SEY PRINTING INC 1103400 PRINTII~/CUPSCENR 9/9 0.00 2840.00 1020 571803 09/10/99 M CCAPA 1104510 1020 571804 09/10/99 1453 (~IRISTOPHBRS CARPET SERV 1108504 ~ REPAIRS 0.00 740.00 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK IHIN.~S'I'RIAL SUPPLY 1108321 SDPPLIES 0.00 65.56 RUff DAI'B o9/10/99 ?L~ O8:5S:S3 - FII~mCiAL .. 09~10/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE '3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CIiECK REGISTER * DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transac~.crans_da~e between m09/07/1999" and "09/10/1999# FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1108530 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.54 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1108314 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.54 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.54 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1108408 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.54 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 2708405 SUPPLIES 0;00 65.54 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CLARK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1108501 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.54 1020 571805 09/10/99 164 CL/~RK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1108303 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.54 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 524.34 1020 571806 09/10/99 983 CLARK'S HARDWOOD FLOORS 1108504 LABOR & MATERIAL 0.00 1197.00 1020 571807 09/10/99 1128 PEGGY CLARK 5806249 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 '1326.00 1020 571808 09/10/99 829 JONAS CLAUSEN 1103501 PROFESSIONAL SVC 0.00 145.00 1020 571809 09/10/99 173 COCA-COLABOTTLING O~ CA 5606620 SUPPLIESSE ORDER FOR B 0.00 534.72 1020 571809 09/10/99 173 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 SODA 0.00 156.15 1020 571809 09/10/99 173 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 SODA 0.00 298.17 1020 571809 09/10/99 173 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 SODA 0.00 269.68 TOTAL CH~CK 0.00 1258.72 1020 571810 09/10/99 178 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110 I~S PREMIUm4 9/99 0.00 66.~5 1020 571811 09/10/99 M CORY, O, ANNA 5500000 TRIP RFD/DIFFERENCE 0.00 1020 571812 09/10/99 1293 COSMO JUMP 5606620 SERVICE 8/21/99 0.00 140.00 1020 571813 09/10/99 183 COTT0~ SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 PROFESSIONAL SVC 0.00 918.00 1020 571813 09/10/99 183 COTTON SHIRF~ & ASSO IN 110 PROFESSIONAL SVC 0.00 271.80 1020 571813 09/10/99 183 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 PROFF~SIOHAL SVC 0.00 1000.00 1020 571813 09/10/99 183 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 PROFESSIONAL SVC 0.00 1565.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3744.80 1020 571814 09/10/99 1312 COUNTRY CLUB CAR WASH 6308540 COMPLETE DETAIL 0.00 75.00 1020 571815 09/10/99 M COUNTRYNIDE HOME LOANS ! 1100000 REFT,q~D.BUSINESS LICENS 0.00 135.78 1020 571816 09/10/99 984 CROSSROADS CHEVRON SERVI 6308540 GASOLINE/CITY VEHICLES 0.00 2056.96 1020 571817 09/10/99 191 CUPBRTZNOa4A~EROFC(]M 1101000 MICHAEL CHANG 0.00 S0.00 1020 571818 09/10/99 194 C~INO SUPPLY INC 5606640 SUPPLIES 0.00 13.12 1020 571819 09/10/99 198 CUPERTINO ONION SCHL DIS 5806349 FACILITY RENTAL 0.00 10.00 1020 571819 09/10/99 198 CUPERTINO ONION SCHL DIS S806349 FACILITY RENTAL 0.00 991.48 1020 571819 09/10/99 198 CUPERTINO ONION SCHL DIS 5806449 FACILITY RENTAL 0.00 50.90 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1052.38 1020 571820 09/10/99 1507 C~qtRANTIfRATERGROUP SAL 5506549 44 · $62BA & SVC CHRG 0.00 2734.00 1020 571821 09/10/99 201 DAPPER TIRE CO 6308540 PARTS 12.33 RUN DATE 09/10/99 TZM~ 08:SS:54 - PZNANCZAL ACCOTHiTZNG 09/10/99 CITY OF CTJPER?IN0 PA$£ 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK RE(~TSTRR - DZSBURSRt~I~' FUND .~TZON CRITERIA: transact.ct&ns_dace becveen '~09/07/1999" and "09/10/1999N F'~TND - 110 - C~I~TERAJ., FUND CASH ACY_'~'I'~C:HEC:K NO ISSUE I:)'1' .............. Y~IgDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... D£SCR~'P'I'ION ...... S)~..~S T)~C AZ4OTJNT 1020 571822 09/10/99 218 DESIGN SIGNS 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00' 3?3.46 1020 571823 09/10/99 222 DES ASSOCIATES 1108601 PROFESSIONAI~ SVC 0.00 1131.78 2020 571923 09/10/99 222 DES ASSOCIATES 1108602 PROFESSIONAl, SVC 0.00 1660.72 TOTAl, CHECK 0.00 2?92.50 1020 571824 09/10/99 223 DON & MIKE'S S~EEPING IN 2308004 STREET SIqEEPING 8/99 0.00 817?.74 1020 ~71825 09/10/99 225 DGNE RIGHT* ROOFING & GUT 5708510 TIME & HATERXAZ,S 0.00 1315.54 1020 571826 09/10/99 855' I~TLINAlWERTISINC3 INC 1104510 ADS/&IS & C'OP~ DE? DIR 0.00 1667.40 1020 571826 09/10/99 855 Z)U~INADVRRTZSING INC 1104510 AD/GIS COORDINATOR 0.00 769.50 TOTAL C:HEClC 0.00 2436.00 1020 571827 09/10/99 230 DURHAM TRAHSI'ORTATIGN 5806349 TRANSI'OR?AT~GN 8/20/99 0.00 484.20 1020 571828 09/10/99.M RBADAT, HAS,SAN 1100000 RFD DEPOSIT/TEHP ~ 0.00 100.00 1020 571829 09/10/99 234 El~ BNGIb~F, KING DATA SER 110 LEGAL NO'FECES 0.00 61.19 1020 871829 09/10/99 234 EDS ENGINEERING DATA SBR 1101070 L, RGA~ NOTICES 0.00 64.16 ~.~L.Q 571829 09/10/99 234 R~S ENCaINEERING DATA SER 1100000 Z, EGAL NOTICES 0.00 69.41 571829 09/10/99 234 E~q EHC~INEERING DATA SER 110 F. BGAL NOTICES 0.00 65o15 . 571829 09/10/99 234 EDS EZiGINEERINC~ DATA SERf110 LEGAL NOTICES 0.00 68.10 1020 571829 09/10/99 234 nnS ENGINEERINC~DA?A SER 110 LEGAL NOTICES 0.00 64.49 1020 571829 09/10/99 234 EDS EHCaIHEERING DA?A SRR 210 ~ NOTICES 0.00 60.20 TOTi~C~CX 0.00 482.?0 1020 571830 09/10/99 812 B)~Rb'~NCYV~IICr.~E SYSTEM 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 170.79 1020 571831 09/20/99 253 EXCHAN(IE LINEN'SERVICE 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 100.57 1020 571831 09/10/99 253 EXCHX~'E LZNGN SERVICX 5806249 LINEN RENTAL 0.00 63.90 1020 571831 09/10/99 253 %. EXCHANGE LII~N SERVICE 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 123.40 1020 571831 09/~0/99 253 EXCHANGE L:[NEN snvICE 5606620 suPPLiES : 0.00 163.70 1020 571831 09/20/99 253 EXC:HANGN LINEN SERVICE 5806249 LINnl RE)TTAL : 0.00 96.62 TOTAL(:31BClC · 0.00 54?.29 1020 571832 09/10/99 260 ~ERALEXPRESS CC~P 4209528 FREIGHT 0.00 17.75 1020 S71832 09/10/99 260 L"'BDBRAL BXPRBSS ~ 1107301 PRIORITY OVERIIIGh'T 0.00 35.75 2020 S71832 09/10/99 260 IFBD~RA~BXPRES~. CORP 4209528 FREI&JrT 0.00 19.25 1020 S72832 09/10/99 260 FImB;RAZ, EX~q~ES CORP :1108803 FREIGHT 0.00 29.25 1020 571832 09/10/99 260' ~ EXPRESS CORP 1104510 FEZ)EX 2 DAY 0.00 11.80, 1020 571832 09/10/99 260 FEDERAT~EXPRESS CORP 6308540 EXPRESS SAVER 0.00 ?,SO TOTAL CEECX 0.00 ~22.30 1020 S71833 09/10/99 1255 FIRS~ ~IVB DZSTRIB 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 S3.26 1020 571833 09/10/99 1255 FIRST AUTC]M3TZVE DISTRIB 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 286.48 TOTAL CHEC*K 0.00 339.?4 ~A~n, S71834 09/10/99 264 FITZPA'I'RICXBARRICADE & 2?08404 SOPPLIES 0.00 S1.85 571834 09/10/99 264 FITZPATRZClCRARRICADg i 2?08404 SUPPLIES 0.00 80.68 RUN DATE 09/:].0/99 TIME 08:55:54 - FZNMIClAL ACC(:X]BTIII~ 09/10/99 ~ITY OF ~JPERTINO PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTBR - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: cransacc.crans_dace becveen #09/07/1999" and ~09/10(1999m FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT .CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 132.50 1020 571835 09/10/99 1106 FRANK & RON HO~L-MOT~h 5708510 SUPPLIES 0.00 150.08 1020' 571836 09/10/99 274 FRY*S ELECTRONZC 1108303 SUPPLIES 0.00 98.43 1020 571837 09/10/99 275 SUSAN FUI(UBA 6806449 R~CR~TION PROGRAM 0.00 3223.00 1020 571835 09/10/99 1268 GALLI PRODUCE 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 117.50 1020 571838 09/10/99 1268 GA~J~I PRODUCE 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 108.15 1020 571838 09/10/99 1268 GALLI PRODUCE ~806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 220.60 1020 571838 09/10/99 1268 GALLI PRODUCE 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 91.60 1020 571838 09/10/99 1268 GALLI PRODUCE' 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 33.85 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 571.60 1020 571839 09/10/99 1510 GARCIA WELL & I~]~P COMPA 1108502 S~4P PUMP REPlACeMENT 0.00 113).52 1020 571B40 09/10/99 M GARRXTY, PHYLLIS 5500000 OV~RPAYMENT/SH~UDOAH 0.00 50.00 1020 S71841 09/10/99 282 GMUtOD FARMS/STABT.~S 5806449 I~CRSATION PROGRAM 0.00 700.00 1020 571842 09/10/99 292 GOIJFLANDU S A S806349 AD14ISSION. 7/28/99 0.00 1~h 00 1020 571842 09/10/99 292 GOLPLAND U S A 5806349 ADHISSION 0.00 1020 571842 09/10/99 292 GOLPLANDU S A '5806349 ADMISSION 0.00 14..S0 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 420.00 1020 571843 09/10/99 298 GRAINGER INC 1108315 SUPPLIES 0.00 407.85 1020 571843 09/10/99 298 GRAINGER INC 6308540 SUPPLIES 7.52 98.64 TOTAL CHECK 7.52 S06.49 1020 S71844 09/10/99 853 J~.RY HAAG 1107302 PROFESSIONAL SVC 8/31 0.00 1200.00 1020 571845 09/10/99 315 JILL HAFF S806449 RBCR~ATION PROGR/~4 0.00 230.00 1020 571846 09/10/99 318 HANDS ON LEARNING 5806349 SUPPLIES 0.00 3104.04 1020 S71847 09/10/99 325 DANIEL HEDDBN 1106265 SECT~ITY 8/28/99 0.00 75.00 1020 571848 09/10/99 328 LAUREN ~ 5806449 R~C~EATION ~ 0~00 69,00 1020 S71849 09/10/99 1228 uxzz. HODGXN 5806249 RECRBATXON PROGRAM 0,00 . . 1471,60 1020 S71850 09/10/99 995 XNSERV COMPANY . 1108502 NATER TREATMENT 9/99 0,00 159,49 1020' S71850 09/10/99 995 XNSERV C(~4PAHY 1108504 WATER TRRATMKNT 9/99 0.00 159,49 1020 571850 09/10/99 995 XNSBRV COMPANY 1108501 WATER TREATMENT 9/99 0,00 XSg.49 TOTAL CX. I~CK 0,00 478,47 1020 S71851 09/10/99 1121 XNTERACTXVE XDEHTXTY S806449 OHLXNE SOFTWARE 0,00 149.99 1020 S71852 09/10/99 353 XRON~AXN 1104300 RECORDS'FORAGE 0,00 1020 S71853 09/10/99 1508 J,H, WALTO~ & ASSOCXATES 1108601 PROFESSIONAL SVC 0,00 574,82 Rb~i DA'Z~ 03/10/93 ?II~E 08:$$:55. 09/10/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK RF~Ib-~k - DISBURSEMENT FUND .CTION CRITERIA: cr&nsacc.crans_da~e between m09/07/1999- and '09/10/1999" Ft~TD - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHSCK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571854 09/10/99 M J~SSELYN, ANASTASIA 5606620 REPLACE CK42553 7/23/9 0.00 935.02 1020 571855 09/10/99 879 E~YSER MARSTONASSOCZATE 1104001 PROFESSIONAL SVC 7/99 0.00 4355.63 1020 571856 09/10/99 373 KIRK XPEDX 1104300 PAPER SUPPLIES 60.09 773.53 1020 571857 09/10/99 390 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 2708405 SUPPLIES 0.00 591.30 1020 571858 09/10/99 397 LEELIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108303 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 125.55 1020' 571858 09/10/99 397 I~SLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108407 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 125.55 1020 571858 09/10/99 397 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108321 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 125.55 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3?6.65 1020 571859 09/10/99 1218 FRANK T LEWIS 1108315 DRAINAG~ AND IERIOATIO 0.00 2300.00 1020 571860 09/10/99 400 LI~TIME TENNIS 5706450 T~IS INSTRUCTION 0.00 36360.56 1020 571861 09/10/99 400 LOS ~ILTOS MEATS 5606620 ~TJPPLIES 0.00 231.16 · 020 571861 09/10/99 408 LOS GATOS MEATS 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 265.93 1020 571861 09/10/99 408 LOS ~ATOS M~ATS 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 1055.61 571061 09/10/99 408 LOS OATOS ~/~ATS 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 4041.56 ~CHECE 0.00 5594.26 1020 571862 09/10/99 422 HOI~NIE MANSOOR 5006449 ~TION ~ROOP~M 0.00 55.20 1020 571863 09/10/99 423 MANTEK CORP 1108005 SUPPLIES 0~00 1450.00 1020 571863 09/10/99 423 MANTEK CORP 1108501 SUPPLIES 0.00 93.95 1020 571063 09/10/99 423 MANTLE CORP : 1108312 SUPPLIES 0.00 93.95 1020 571863 09/10/99 423 M~T~X CORP 6300540 SUPPLIES 0.00 38?.92 TOTAL(~CK .0.00 2025.62 1020 571864 09/10/99 1500 DES~A)CC~_NN 5806249 ERC~ATION..F~OO]~X 0.00 iS4.00 1020 571865 09/10/99 437 I~T~ON]WSPAP~S 1101070 F~LIC ~IN~ NOTICR 0.00 ~17.S0 1020 S?L866 09/~0/99 443 MI~IUI(~OmNIC~ Ui ~108507 ~ a PARTS 0.00 2050.60 1020 S71866 09/10/99 443 I~IUM)~Y:~IlC~L IN 5?08510 S~F~CR CXT~ 0.00 105.00 1020 571866 09/~0/99 44~ M~LL~NI~I~)~(:~XNIC:~L IN ~108507 ~ & PARTS 0.00 2290.?0 1020 57~86~ 09/~0/99 443 MILL~UX~C~MIC~ IN 1108507 FA~S~BATERCX~mTS 0.00 239.49 1020 571866 09/10/99 443 N~.I~NI~I~M~C:N*NICX~ IN 1100507 ~ & P~TS 0.00 3590.42 1020 571866 09/~0/99 443 MIT.T.~M~T.~UEANIC~ IN ~08507 T~Oa & PARTS 0.00 3402.~6 TOTAL C~CK 0.00 116?0.37 1020 571867 09/~0/59 1450 OmISTOF~m MIT~.~ 560662O S~CE 0.00 63.00 1020 571866 .09/10/99 94O MI~ITAS ~ INC 63O854O SU~IES 0.00 26.30 1D-~ 571869 09/10/99 44? ~IESION m~Fo~! s~wIC~ 11o0201 mlIFO~M SERVICE 0.00 ?2.43 571869 .... 09/10/99 44? MISSION ~IFOP~! SERVICE 1108201 DNIFO~M SERVICE 0.00 ?2.4] T._~m,(:~C]C 0.00 ~44.86 RL~ DA'~, 09/10/99 ?IM~ 08:55:55 - PZNANCZAL ACCOUNTZNG 09/10/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: :ransacc.:rans_dace between ~09/07/1999# and ~09/10/1999e F~ - 110 - GENER~Ja FUblD CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCHIFTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571870 09/10/99 448 MISSION V~T.T.~y FORD INC 6308540 PARTS & LABOR 152.11 4640.84 1020 571871 99/10/99 455 HEATHER MOLL 5806249 R~C~TION PRCX~RAM 0.00 297.00 1020 571872 09/10/99 463 VIC'~OR G M~S~I 580~449 ~TION PR~ 0.00 161.00 1020 S71873 09/10/99 465 ~AIN VI~ ~ ~ 1108312 ~LIES 0.00 28.09 1020 S71873 09/10/99 46S ~AIN VI~ ~ ~ 1108312 S~PLIES 0.00 225.87 1020 ~71973 09/10/99 4&S ~AIN VI~ ~EN ~ 1108303 ~PLI~ 0.00 11.T0 ~ ~CK 0.00 265.66 1020 571874 09/10/99 M ~, PA~ICIA ~806349 ' REI~~ 0.00 64.93 1020 571875 09/10/99 479 ~S W~D ~606620 ~IES 0.00 484.42 1020 ~1876 09/10/99 499 DEBBIE O~I~ ~06620 ~R 0.00 425.00 1020 57187T 09/10/99 1231 MIlL O~IN 5806449 ~TION PR~ 0.00 153.00 1020 571878 09/10/99 4~5 OFFI~ ~PER 1104300 S~PLIES ' 4.23 &" 1020 571878 09/10/99 49S OFFI~ ~LP~ 1104300 ~PPLXES S. 87 J ~ ~CK 10.10 ~4~ .45 1020 571879 09/10/99 1190 R~ O~S 1103500 ~SSION~ SERVI~ 0.00 202.50 1020 571880 09/10/99 1379 O~IM ~ITION ZNC 5706450 ~I~ 0.00 139. 1020 571881 09/10/99 503 OR~ ~PLY 5606620 ~P~ZES 0.00 83.28 1020 571881 09/10/99 503 OR~ ~PLY . 5606620 ~I~ 0.00 31.20 1020 571881 09/10/99 503 OR~ ~PLY 5606620 ~PLIES '0.00 25. 1020 571881 09/10/99 503 OR~ ~PLY 5606620 ~PLIES 0.00 ' 141. 1020 S71881 09/10/99 503 ~ ~PLY 5606640 ~PLI~ 0.00 61.19 1020 5718~1 09/10/99 503 OR~ ~Y 5606640 SUP~I~ 0.00 11~. 102~ 571881 09/10/99 503 OR~ ~PLY 5606620 ~IES 0.00 21.62 ~T~ ~CK 0.00 1020 571882 09/10/99 504 ~l~ ~l~ ~. 1106248 ~l~ 0.00 S4.00 1020 5718~2 09/10/99 504 ~l~ ~l~ ~ 110624~ ~IES 0.00 ~ ~ 0.00 181. 1020 571883 09/10/99 507 ~ OS~ 1108530 ~TZ~ F~ 0.00 1125.00 1020 571883 09/10/99 507 ~ ~B~ 110~501 ~S PA~ 0.00 1420.63 1020 57188~ 09/10/99 507 ~ OS~ 1108503 ~ A ~T~I~ 0.00 385.00 1020 571883 09/10/99 507 ~ ~ 110830~ ~R & ~I~ 0.00 217~.24 ~ ~ 0.00 5103.~7 1020 571884 09/10/99 1466 ~ ~R ~ OF ~ 1108315 ~OR · ~I~ 0.00 1170.00 1020 571885 09/10/99 508 P E R S - ~ 1104510 ~ ~I~ 9/99 0.00 142, 1020 571885 09/10/99 SOB P E R S - ~ 110 ~ P~Z~ 9/99 0.00 3639i.~2 RUN PX'r~ 09/10/99 TI~ 08:55:56 ' - FINA~CU~., ACCOUI'rl'ING 09/10/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE S ~CCOUNTING P~RIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER o DISBURS~NT FU~D 1020 5~1885 09/10/99 50~ P ~ R S - H~ 1104520 ~ PREMZ~ 9/99 0.00 254.11 ~ ~ 0.00 5092~.83 ~020 S71886 09/10/99 510 P.D.M. ~EL 1108503 ' ~pPLZ~ 0.00 256.11 1020 57Z886 09/~0/99 510 P.D.M. STEE~ 6308540 S~PL1~ 0.00 256.~1 ~ ~ECK 0.00 S~2.22 1020 571887 09/10/99 S13 P~ZFIC ~ & E~IC 4209110 ~ZCI~ ~709033 0.00 36.86 1020 571888 09/~0/99 515 PACZFZC ~T SE~Z~ IN 5708510 S~VZ~ ~ 8/11/99 0.00 75.00 1020 571888 09/10/99 515 P~ZFIC ~ SB~I~ IN 4209206 ~ F1~ SY~ U~ 0.00 12197.50 ~ ~ECK 0.00 12272.50 1020 571889 09/10/99 525 PEEK~FIC ~108S02 ~~REPAZR 0.00 866.44 1020 571890' 09/10199 531 ~PS1-~ ~P~ 5806249 ~ 0.00 107.38 1020 5~1891 09/10/99 M ~~ ~INZ~ ~S 1108201 P ~VZS & C ~TZ~Z 0.00 790.00 1020 571892 09/10/99 $45 ~FF PISER~IO S606640 ~O~S1~ S~VI~S 0.00 1705.00 5~1893 09/10/99 1509 ~R~ ~S ZNC 5506549 T~ ~ 0.00 138.3V 1020 571894 09/10/99 ~24~ ~IE ~ 1104300 ~~ 0.00 429.22 1020 571895 09/10/99 S70 ~O S~ FZ~ J96062 1108407 ~ 0.00 21.63 1020 571896 09/10/99 S74 ~ FZ~SS ~ 5706450 ~SZ~ ~/~ I 0.00 1096.00 1020 571897 09/10/99 S75 ~ ~Y ~108504 ~ 11.64 172.40 1020 571898 09/10/99 1498 M1~ ~Z~Y 5806249 ~TI~ ~ 0.00 143.00 1020 571899 09/10/99 ~0?X ~C ~C X~08602 ~ & ~l~ 0.00 2585.00 1020 571899 09/10/99 1071 ~ZC ~ZC 2709405 ~ & ~ 0;00 16997.00 1020 571899 09/10/99 1071 ~LZC ~ZC 2?09405 ~ & ~ 0.00 999.B~ ~~ 0.00 21581.8? 1020 S71900 09/10/99 845 ~ ~A~ 1108321 ~ 0.00 925.00 1020 S71901 09/10/99 ~223 ~A~C~4209525 ~SZ~/~ I 0.00 6537,?8 2020 571902 09/10/99 ~332 RI~ A m ~lC 4209526 ~SSl~ ~C/~ 1 0.00 24060.60 1020 571903 09/10/99 1495 ~A~ RZ~ 5806249 ~T~ ~ 0.00 143.00 1020 571904 09/10/99 600 R~-~ S~ Snvzc 110850v P~ & ~ 0.00 ~ ~16.25 3~ s7190s 09/10/99 34s ~ ~cIs~ ~A~ 1108501 ~A~ ~C 9/9~ 0.00 136.68 S71905 09/10/99 345 ~ ~ZS~ ~A~ 1108502 ~A~R ~C 9/99 0.00 46.22 T~ ~ 0.00 182.80 RU~IDATE 09/10/99 TIME 00:55:56 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 09/10/99 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER o DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: Cransac~.crans_dace between -09/07/1999' and ~09/1'0/1999' FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCTCHECKNO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 571906 09/10/99 1442 SAR JOSE ICE C0~PANY 5606620 ICE 0.00 175.00 1020 571907 09/10/99 1164 SAN JOSE, CITY OF 6306540 ELECTRIC VEHICLES SVC 0.00 470.67 1020 571909 09/10/99 979 SAN JOSE, CITY OF 5806349 ADmISSION/HAPPY HOLLO~ 0.00 160.00 1020 571909 09/10/99 M SARCRA 5006449 SOFTBALL REGISTRATION 0.00 21.00 1020 571910 09/10/99 628 SANTA CIERA COUNTY SHERI 5606620 SECURITY 0.00 1197.60 1020 571910 09/10/99 626 SANTA CLARA COUt~TY SH~RI 5606620 SECURITY 0.00 1217.56 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2415.16 1020 571911 09/10/99 M SANTA CLARAMETRO 5866449 SOFTBALL REGISTRATION 0.00 42.00 1020 571912 09/10/99 M SANTA CLARA, CITY OF S600000 RFD/OVERPMT ADMISSION 0.00 212.50 1020 571913 09/10/99 647 EnlZABETH SHANNON 5806449 RECREATION PRO(]R2%M 0.00 806.00 1020 571914 09/10/99 659 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADSMY 5806449 R~CREATION PROGR~M 0.00 12671.00 1020 571915 09/10/99 1152 KlM MARIE SMITH 1104300 R~IMEURSEMENT 0.00 1020 571916 09/10/99 1116 SONY EI~CTR0~ICS INC 1103500 SUPPLIES 0.00 246.29 1020 571917 09/10/99 665 SOUTH BAY METROPOLITAR 5806449 ~4PIRES 8/99 0.00 923.00 1020 571918 09/10/99 M SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBL 1108005 UPDATED HAZMAT MATERIA 0.00 40.00 1020 571919 09/10/99 684 CHERYL STODDARD 5006449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 201.25 1020 571920 09/10/99 M STONE, JACKIE 5606620 REIME~qtS~MENT' 0.00 129.77 1020 571921 09/10/99 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606249 SUPPLIES 0.00 709.40 1020 571921 09/10/99 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 3140.00 1020 571921 09/10/99 695 SYSCO FO0~ SERVICES OF S 5606620 SUPPhIES 0.00 1213.80 1020 571921 09/10/99 695 SYSCO FOOD SEItVZCES OF S 5806249 SUPPLIES 0.00 312.29 TOTAL CHECK 0~00 S384.37 1020 571922 09/10/99 698 TAL~Y'S E~r~PHZSES 2708403 REC~IS~'~uC~ION OF CURB 0.00 14953.45 1020 571923 09/10/99 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108407 SUPPLIES 0.00 354.65 1020 571924 09/10/99 701 TARGET STORES 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 9.48 1020 571925 09/10/99 708 NANCY TH0~4PS0~ 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 ~61.00 1020 571926 09/10/99 712 TRACTOR EOUIP~NT CO 6308540 I~BOR & PARTS 0.36 550.03 1020 571927 09/10/99 724 TURF & INDUSTRIAL SOUIP 8308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 1 1020 571927 09/10/99 724 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EOUIP 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 15~.31 RT.~i D~TE 09/10/99 ?IHII 08:55:5'/ - FlliJ~¢II~., J~¢COI~IIqG 09/10/99 CITY OF CUP~ltTINO ' PAGE A~UNTINO PERIOD: 3/00 CHECK REGISTER - DISB~ ~. .~ION ~I~RIA: C~ansacC.Ccans_d~e becveeg '09/07/~9~9~ and ~ ~ECK 0.00 3L9.53 ~020 57~928 09/~0/99 725 ~l~r~ G~ZCS INC 5806449 ~TZON PR~ 0:00 1020 5~1929 09/10/99 1451 ~0 R.~.'S S~ ~ S~ 2V08404 . P~TS & ~RI~ 431.08 5656.25 1020 571910 09/10/99 H ~S 1108601 ~Z~T~ON/V~ 0.00 65.00 1020 5V1931 09/10/99 732. ~Z~ ~ ~IP ZN 6308540 ~R 0.00 292.50 1020 571931 09/10/99 7~2' ~ ~UC~ ~ZP IN 6308540 P~TS & ~OR 0.00 ]223.02 ~ ~CK 0.00 3515.52 1020 571932 09/10/99 1054 ~l~l~ OF ~RZ~ 1108601 P~SER ZZI ~ES 0.00 180.00 1020 5q1933 09/10/99 ~38 V~ OZ~ ~P~ 6308540 1020 571933 09/10/99 738 V~ OZ~ ~P~ 630~540 ~ZES 0.00 2~6.64 ~ ~CK 0.00 571.14 1020 571934 09/10/99 746 VZKI~ OFFZ~ ~O~ 1108501 ~ZES 0.00 ~6.V6 1020 571934 09/10/99 746 VIKZ~ 0~I~ PRO~S 1108501 ~ ~E~ 0.00 112.52 1~..~ 571935 09/10/99 761 ~~ ~Ry .5606620 ~Z~ 0.00 389.0~ 1020 571936 09/10/99 990 ~~ 1101500 ~ZB~Y 0.00 721.49 1020 571937 09/10/99 769 ~ ~ DZ~ZB~Z~ Z 6309820 FAIRLY ~ 2227.50 29227.50 1020 5V1938 09/10[99 V82 ~VI~ ~I~ 1108101 ~ ~ ~P~SES 0.00 25.00 1020 571938 09/10/99 782 ~VI~ ~Z~ 5609105 PRO~SSI~ ~C 0.00 1664.43 1020 571939 09/10/99 784 ~I~ ~ ~S~ZA~ 1108601 ~O~SI~ ~7/99 0.00 752.20 1020 571940 09/10/99 794 ~ ~R~TX~ 1104310 ~PZ~ ~E~ 0.00 926.04 1020 571941 09/10/99 ~ ~, ~ 11p0000 HZ~ZDE ~I~P 0.00 1167.00 ~H ~ 11130.78 472855.83 ~ 11130.78 47288S.83 ~ ~RT 11130.78 4728SS.83 RESOLUTION NUMBER 99-269 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON SEPTEMBER 03, 1999 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and'to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL $355,294.54 Less Employee Deductions $(112,492.26) NET PAYROLL $242,802.28 Payroll check numbers issued 43162 through 43422 CERTIFIED: Director of Adrri~msti'ative Serviee~ ' PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of September ,1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: -- City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino RESOLUTION NO. 99-270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS WHEREAS, the City Council did by adoption of Resolution Nos. 8894 and 8930 establish roles and regulations for records retention and destruction; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain records in excess of two years old no longer contain data of any historical or administrative significance; and WHEREAS, the departmental request for permission to destwy all said records in excess of two years old has been approved by the City Clerk and the City Attorney pursuant to Resolution Nos. 8894 and 8930; _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino authorizes destruction of the records specified in the schedule attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20~' day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members .of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino ~oy 2s. 23. ~, 25. 26, s?, ss, · 29 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR, DESTRUCTION Department: CitY Clerk Contact: Kimb~ly Smith or Roberts Wolfe ": ' Page: I of 5 - File Name: Destroy 22 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card ~ recent date) D -- to be destroyed Vallco Park & Vallco File Number 76-001 Agreement Vallco Park 5-3-76 Center - Quit¢laiming & Releasing Rights to Previous Agreement Not Vail¢o Park Ltd. - File Number 76-002, Second Amendment Vallco Park 3-1-76 d~troy0d - Modifying Existing Res. 4161 to Agr~ument .kept by Com~ Air Rights " Development Res. 4163 · ~. :. ':....'i Mayor's Signature File Number '/6-004 ':. '""-.~. Transmittal Letters- File Number 76-005 Various Transmittal Various 6-77 - · :. i' ~i:" Agmts. & Contracts Letters, Agmts., and 10-77 ..~i.. Contracts .... · Mackay & Somps File Number 77-001 Agreement for Regnart Canyon 8-26-77 " ..:..'~...i. '- Environmental Preparation of Area :.. '. ~. Impact Report Environmental .. ... Impact Report _.g_ Destory 22 Page 1 of 5 RECORDS INVENTORY FOk a~ICROFILMIN(3 OR. DESTRUCrlION · Department:. City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Robetta Wolfe Page: 2 of 5 - File Name: Destroy 22 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address ~r Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M -- to be microfi'lmed card ~ recent date) D = to be destroyed Santa Clara Valley File Number 77-002, 1. Agreements Santa Clara Valley 7-30-74 Employment and Res. 3706, Employment and 11-18-74 Trgi. 'ning Board 3776 Training Board 1-10-75 Contracts 3843 7-1-75 3986 11-3-75 4059 7-1-76 4216 10-18-76 4270 2. Contracts " 6-1-77 4741 4-1-78 -- · ' 10-1-79 ". ": ." ':.'i .'. Cupertino Garden File Number 77-003~ .Agreement Cupertino Gnrdens 9-7-77 " Patio Homes, Tract Res. 4534 Patio Homes 6059, Unit 2 '. Monta Vista Park File Number 77-004, 1. Contract Monta Vista Park 8-30-77 Phnse I Res. 4293 2. Contract " 11-7-77 '":' =i;'. ?.:.=: Change Order .' ?.':=::'. Clayton T. Woods File Number 77-005 Agreement Tract 6117 8-8-77 · and Twila C. Woods, .. ::. Tract 6117 · .:i ':..i: Gateway File Number 77-006 Agreement Rancho Deep 8-16-77 · ' "' Construction Cliff, Tract 6096 Company, Inc. Tract 6096 · .": Varian Park Phase I File Number 77-007 Contract Varian Park 8-30-77 '. .' :::." Pioneer Maintenance File Number 77-008 Contract Cupertino City 6-17-77 "" DPW 78-4, Misc. File Number 77-012 Contract City of Cupertino 1 0-11-77 · ":"" ~::.'ii'": Concrete Purchase " .....· Cap Concrete ~ Destory 22 Page 2 of 5 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR'MIC~R.OFILMINO OR DESTRUC'TION. '~:.',?" '. '. Department:. City Clerk Contact: gimt~erly Smith or Robem Wolfe. '. 'i:" ". Page: 3 of 5'~ File Name: Destroy 22 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location ' Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit. (or most M = to be microfilmed card ~ recent date) D = to be deslroyed Barnes, Barre L & File Number 77-014, Improvement 22660 San Juan 7-11-77 Wanda J. Res. 3339 3399 Agreements Rd., Cupertino 1-31-79 5034 6-5-79 5448 9-29-80 5931 2-16-82 5944 .....~i Blanc, o, Manuel & File Number 77-015, Improvement Tract 1093 7-26-77 Dorothy Res. 3339 Agreement · .:.. . :..-:::: ..::::?.i. Tract No. 5621, De File Number 77-016, Agreement De Anzn Pines 9-20-77 Anza Pines W.T. Res. 4551 Tract 5621 ':.':~..."' '..: ::.::.." ?::~:;'." May Investment Co. File Number 77-017, Agreement North Walnut 9-28-77 :..'. . .. -. :¥- :::..:..::: .... Recoating of File Number 77-018 1. Contrnct Mercedes Tank 9-28-77 " '"' Mercedes Tank No. 1 '2. Agreement No. 1 7-6-82 .. · ."..:"?.:: :.:' Resurfncing of De File Number 77-019, Agreement De Anzn 5-23-77 · .:..~': · :. ::... Anza Blvd. Res. 4478 Boulevard : Cooperative · ..,.:'.. · Agreement with State :'.' :'~' Design Dynamics File Number 77-020 Contract Civic Center 10-25-77 ·. :.~ :..::~:.:::: Corp. - Civic Center Parking Lot · "..:: ...: Parking Lot Lighting · .....::. Conversion 78-2 ~ Destory 22 Page 3 of 5 RECORDS INVENTORY FOtx ,dICROFRMHNG OR DESTRUGTION: :: i:i::":.: .... Department: City Clerk Contact= Kimbedy Smith or Roberta Wolfe :.": - Page: 4 of 5 .- File Name: Destroy 22 ' :::.. No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card ~ recent date) D -- to be destroyed Pacific Gas & File Number 77-021, Agreement North De Anza 8-16~77 Electric Co. No. De.Res. 4304.23, Boulevard Anza Blvd. 4304.24, 4456.3 Assessment District Not Vallco Park Ltd. File Number 77-022, Agreement Vallco Park 7-18-77 destroyed., .. Res. 4515 kept by c°m; Dev. Sept. '. · ... -:: '.. =~':~.: ::.'. Memorial Park File Number 77-024, Agreement Tract 6015 5-16-77 · '::..:".. ~'!,:.. Gatlin, Dale R. File Number 77-025 Agreement P.O. Box 933 11-15-77 ':::.'" '.:.':""::':i:/' Rolling Hills of File Number 77-027, License Agreement Rolling Hills 4-H 10-21-74 · '.:::..." '::.:'..:. Cupertino 4-H Club Res. 3736 Club of Cupertino · ...:.. ':...'::... ~. :~::i.'.::. Merrick, Robert G. &File Number 77-029, Improvement Hillcrest Road 11-1-77 ' .. :~..' (:..: ' Measurex File Number 77-030 Improvement Measurex 11-1-77 ": :.......... Corporation Agreement Corporation ....." '.'. Calabazas Creek File Number 77-031, 1. Agreement Santa Clara Valley11-15-77 ....." 'L.. Storm Drainage' Res. 3873.22 2. Conveyance Water District 2-3-82 · .-" ~::.;.:i~: ~:' ...' 5808 Document Calabnzas Creek :'".:.'".'" Baumgardner, Arthur File Number 77-033, 1. Improvement Crescent Road 9-14-77 :':. '"" :':' R. & Dorothy D. Res. 3339 Agreement " ... 2. Deferred 5-11-84 Destro7 22 Page 4 of 5 \ RF.K~RDS INVENTORY FOR MXCROFR. MING OR DESTRU~ON '7%?.i' '=' ~.' .' .'=. :'~'~ '.= "" ' .... D,~,~n~ Cit~ a=k Con~ Ximb=ly Smi,~ or aobem Wotre. '..: .~:'='=:.:.:.'.' 'i"... i.. : ".: Page:SolS' ' ' ' "' · :ii' ' ... =- File Name: Destroy 22 ..... . . . .....~... No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card/0 recent date) D = to be destroyed Vallco Pnrk Traffic File Number 77-034, A~eement Vallco Pnrk 11-10-77 Reduction Program Res. 4594 Engineering Services Desto~ 22 Page 5 of 5 RECORDS INVENTORY FOl, MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Deparlment: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberts Wolfe Page: 1 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D -- to be destroyed Community File Number 78-001 1. Grantee City of Cupertino 12-31-76 Development Block Performance to 1-1-78 Program Report Res. 5278 2. Housing Community 6-18-80 to Provision Housing 6-18-83 Agreement Developers Res. 5924 3. Amended " 7-27-82 to Agreement 7-27-85 Res~ 6409 4. Housing Provision " 11-6-84 Agreement Res. 8054 5. Agreement County of Santa 7-1-90 to Clara 6-30-91 · Re~/. 8509 6. Agreement " 7-1-91 to 6-30-92 Res. 8550 7. Agreement " 7-1-92 to 6-30-93 ~ Deslroy23 Page 1 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 2 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card ii) recent date) D = to be destroyed Joint Exercise of File Number 78-002 1. Joint Exercise City of Cupertino12-5-77 to Powers Agreement & of Powers 6-30-79 Pursuant to Title I of Agreement the Housing and 2." " 9-2:5-78 to Community 6-30-80 Development Act Res. 5'116 3." " 9-27-79 to 1974 6-30-81 Res. 5761 4." " 11-10- 81to 6-30- 85. Res. 6408 5." " 1985 to 1987 Res. 7347 6." " 10-27-87 to 6-30-91 7." " 7-1-89 to 6-30-90 Res. 8217 8." " 10-1-90 to 9-30-93 The Koll Company File Number 78-003 Agreement The Koll Company 2-6-78 ~ Destroy23 Page 2 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FO~, MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION · Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe. Page: 3 of 9 - File Name: Deslroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Sunnyview Lutheran File Number 78-004 1. Agreement Sunnyview 2-6-78 Home, Inc. Lutheran Home, Inc. 22445 .. Res.' 694 Cupertino Rd. 2. Agreement for " 5-25-78 Contingency Parking Area 3. Supplemental " 10-3-78 Agreement 4." " 11-9-78 Corporation Yard File Number 78-006 Contract for Public R.J. Zipse Paving 7-6-81 to 1981 Work Co., Inc. 8-10-81 Corporation Yard File Number 78-006 1. Contract for Apex Construction 11-16-81 Sound Wall Apex Public Work Inc. to 12-16- Const. 79-16 81 2." Saldivar 7-19-82 to Construction Inc. 8:19-82 3." Andero 9-21-82 to Construction Inc. 10-21-82 ~ Destroy23 Page 3 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 4 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M -- to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed R.L. Chaides File Number 78-006 1. Contract for A.L. Thiel, Inc. 1-16-78 to Construction Co., Public Work 2-20-78 Inc. (Corporation 2." Jack Horton 1-16-78 to Yard Contract No. 3) Drywall, Inc. 1-31-78 3." McCarthy & 1-25-78 to Spiesman, Inc. 2-9-78 4." Shaw Interior 1-30-78 to Specialties, Inc. 2-14-78 5." Joe. E. Hemandez, 2-9-78 to Co. 4-14-78 6." Garbini Electric 2-9-78 to Co. 4-14-78 7." Guardian 2-21-78 to Automatic 3-31-78 Sprinklers, Inc. 8." R.L. Chaides 2-21-78 to Construction Co., 4-10-78 Inc. 9." L.R. Triilo Co. 2-24-78 to 3-21-78 10." Joe Amaral 2-24-78 to Plumbing, Inc..- 4-29-78 11." Marmol Tile 6-15-78 to 6-30-78 12." Radonich 7-3-78 to Inshlation & 8-8-78 Roofing 13." B.L. Cohen 6-7-79 to Landscaping 7-7-79 ~ Destroy23 Page 4 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOB MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 5 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed cnrd #) recent dnte) D = to be destroyed Corporation Yard File Number 78-006 Payroll Sheets Santa Cl. ara Valley File Number 78-007 Agreement City of Cupertino 1-16-78 Water District Res. 4639 Hewlett Packard File Number 78-008 1. Agreement HeWlett Packard 10-78-78 Co. Res. 3339 2." " 4-3-78 Raisch Construction File Number 78-009 Change Order Vallco Pnrkway 1-17-78 Co. (Vallco Parkway and Calabazas & Calabazas Creek Creek Culvert Culvert) ~ Destroy23 Page 5 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Deparlment: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 6 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Safer Off-System File Number 78-010, ' Roads (Local Agency Res. 4496 1. Local Agency- City of Cupertino 7-14-77 - State Agreement State Agreement No. 04-5318) for Federal Aid Projects Res. 4496 2. Supplement No. Various Locations 6-10-77 1 to Local Agency-State Agreement Res. 4638 3. Supplement No. In the City of 11-29-77 2 Cupertino at 50 Locations Res. 4694 4. Supplement No. Various Locations 4-7-78 3 Res. 4736 5. Supplement McClellan Rd. 5-23-78 No. I to Local from Mira Vista Agency - State Ave. to Stevens Agreement Creek Bridge Res. 4832 6. Supplement No. " 9-14-78 I Rev. 1 Res. 4716 7.Supplement No. 5 Various Locations 5-4-78 Res. 4716 8. Supplement No. " 10-3-78 5 Rev Res. 8881 9. Supplement No. Saratoga- 4-19-93 7 Sunnyvale Rd. From Bollinger to Prospect Rd. 10. Supplement " 12-2-93 No. 7 Rev. 1 ~ Destroy23 Page 6 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FG.. ,,IICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Depamnent: City Clerk Contact:' Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 7 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Safer Off-System File Number 78-010 Roads (Local Ctd. Agency-State Res. 9216 11. Supplement De Anza Blvd. At 9-20-94 Agreement No. 04- No. 8 the De Anza Blvd. 5318) Over Crossing Res. 9360 12. Supplement . De Anza and 5-10-95 No. 9 Stevens Creek Allan, John Jr. File Number 78-011 Improvement City of Cupertino 3-28-78 Res. 3339 Agreement Mar-Al, Inc. File Number 78-012 Agreement Imperial Avenue 4-13-78 Albert Perrotti Silveroaks West File Number 78-013 Agreement Silveroaks West 6-6-78 Res. 4702 Master Storm Drain " 6-19-78 Reimbursement and Traffic Signal Participation Agreement Homestead Road File Number 78-014 1. Contract for McGuire & Hester 8-21-78 Storm Drain Public Work Improvements Res. 5955 2. Agreement for Kirkeby & 9-20-82 Project 78-18 Engineering Associates, Inc. Services Cobb Morton File Number 78-015 Standard Form of Cobb and Morton 2-7-78 Architects Agreement Between Architects Owner and Architect ~ Destroy23 Page 7 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 8 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date)D = to be destroyed Bas Homes of File Number 78-016 1. Agreement Lots 1-39, Tract 5-13-77 Cupertino II Tract Assigning 5858, Book 382, 6259 Rights Relating Pg. 46 & 47 to Real Property 2." Lots 1-54, Tract 5-13-77 5907, Book 382, Pg. 47 & 48 3. Agreement Tract 6259 3-6-78 4." Tract 6190 9-5-78 Nellis, Robert and File Number 78-017 1. Improvement 22322 Regnart Rd. 11-28-77 Kathy Agreement 'Cupertino, Ca 95014 2." " 3-20-78 Res. 4973, 4976 3. Equestrian " 4-16-79 Easement Res. 4960 4. Agreement Tract 6310 5-1-79 Res. 5852 5. Dedication of " 4-19-82 .Development Rights Chip Sealing Various File Number 78-018, Agreement Between City of Cupertino 7-3-78 Streets Within City Res. 4737 the County of Santa Limits for 1977-1978 Clara and the City of Cupertino Relating to Chip Sealing Various 'Streets Within the City Limits of Cupertino For the Year 1977-78 ~ Destroy23 Page 8 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FO~. ,dlCROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION · Depamnent: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe. Page: 9 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 23 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Caretakers File Number 78-019 1. Caretaker McClellan Ranch 3-21-78 to Agreement Agreement Park 3-21-79 Res. 5635 2." " 5-1-81 to .' 5-1-82 Res. 6091 3." " 5-1-83 to 5-1-84 Res. 6862 4." " 5-1-86 to 5-1-88 Res. 7507 5." " 5-1-88 to' 5-1-90 Res. 8283 6..Caretaker Lease " 11-12-90 Agreement to 11-12- Res. 8776 92 7." " i 1-1-92 to 10-31-94 ~ Destroy23 Page 9 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: I of I 1 - File Name: pestroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Applic.ation, Address or Location . Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Tarantola, Leonard E. File Number 78-020, Agreement Parcel 342-22-38 1-12-78 and Inge G. Res. 3339 Amaral, Wallace and File Number 78-021, 1. Improvement Foothill Blvd. 12-23-77 Betty Res. 3339 Agreement South of Stevens Creek Res. 4919 2." East Side of 2-14-79 Blaney Ave. North of Pacifica Dr. Togami, Minoru and File Number 78-022, Improvement Orange and 1-6-78 Marianne Res. 3339 Agreement Dolores Ave. · · Bayside Electric File Number 78-023 Agreement Bayside Electric 3-28-78 to Distributors Distributors 5-1-78 Multisonics, Inc. File Number 78-024 Agreement Multisonics, Inc. 3-28-78 to 9-28-78 Picone, Ambrose File Number 78-025 Contract for Public Corporation Yard 4-3-78 to Painting Co. Work 4-18-78 West Valley File Number 78-026 Contract for Public Merriman Rd. 4-24-78 to Construction Work Water Main 5-14-78 Company Extension Destroy 24 Page I of 11 _ ) ) RECORDS INVENTORY FO,. MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION DeparUnent: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 2 of 11 - File Name: Deslroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M -- m be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Griffin and Mun'en File Number 78-027, i. Improvement Griffin & Murren 2-24-78 Construction Co.. Res. 3339 Agreement Construction Inc. 2." Griffin 6-12-78 & Murren Construction Inc. and Bennie R. Norman and Linda S. Norman Res. 5346 3. Agreement Dennis E. Griffin 7-7-80 & John T. Murren Tract 6717 Res. 5461 4." Tract 6919 9-30-80 Res. 5461 '5. Deferred Tract Map No. 10-14-80 Improvement 6919 Agreement -' Perez, Reynaldo and File Number 78-028, Agreement Reynaldo P. Perez 3-20-78 Carmen Res. 3339 and Carmen C. Perez Destroy 24 Page 2 of I 1 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 3 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be de.stroyed Lambert and Gwozdz File Number 78-029 1. Improvement Albert Neai 7-6-78 Agreement Lambert and Peggy Ann Lambert, Peter S. Gwozdz and Barbara K. Gwozdz 2. Declaration of Peter S. & Barbara 7-23-86 Restriction K. Gwozdz, Parcel I in Book 423 of Maps Pg. 15 &16 Phyllis Chestnutt File Ntunber 78-030 Improvement 1273 Aster Lane 7-6-78 Agreement San Jose, Ca 95129 Sobrato-Berg File Number 78-031 1. Agreement May Investment 5-13-77 Properties Assigning Co.; Lots 1 Rights Relating through 40, Tract to Real Property 5698, Book 363 of Maps Pg. 49, 50, 51 2. Improvement Sobrato-Berg 6-12-78 Agreement Properties D.S.R. Properties File Number 78-032 Improvement D.S.R. Properties 7-6-78 Agreement Cupertino Patio File Number 78-033 improvement Cupertino Patio 7-3-78 Homes Tract 6059 Agreement' Homes Tract 6059, Phase I and II Destroy 24 Page 3 of 11 ' RECORDS INVENTORY FC~,. ,dlCROFILMING OR DESTRUCI'ION Deparlment: City Clerk Contact:. Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 4 of 11 - File Name: DesUoy 24 No. (to be used File Name File NUmber and/or Subject, Application, 'Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be desUoyed Williams Properties, File Number 78-034 Improvement Tract 6332 7-3-78 Inc. Agreement R. Esquivel & Son File Number 78-035 Contract for Public Memorial Park 7-3-78 to Construction Co. Work 8-3-78 Memorial Park Storage Building Interconnect Conduit File Number 78-036 Contract for Public Rosendin Electric, 7-3-78 to Project 78-3 Work Inc. 8-3-78 Monta Vista Park - File Number 78-037 Contract for Public Monta Vista Park, 6-19-78 to Voss Avenue Street Work Voss Avenue 7-9-78 ImProvements Project 78-10 Traffic Signal File Number 78-038, Cooperative Highway 85 and 4-3-78 Modification, Hwy. Res. 4682 Agreement Stevens Cre6k 85 and Stevens Creek Blvd. Blvd. Work-Study Program File Number 78-039 Work-Study City of Cupertino 7-1-78 Off Campus Project Program Off Agreement Campus Project Agreement Sales Tax File Number 78-040 Sales Tax City of Cupertino 7-1-78 to Memorandum of Memorandum of 7-1-83 Understanding Understanding Destroy 24 Page 4 of I 1 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Deparunent: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberla Wolfe Page: 5 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, AddrEss or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M -- to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Southern Pacific File Number 78-042, 1. Agreement City.of Cupertino 6-12-78 Transportation Co. Res. 4715 EN-41.1 l-xx(N), Res. 4747 2. Street or Southem Pacific 8-8-78 Morea Vista Highway Transportation Co. Easement · Res. 5091 3. Agreement City of Cupertino 7-16-79 Destroy 24 Page 5 of 11 RECORDS INVENTORY FO,, MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION · Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 6 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Senior Citizen Center File Number 78-043 1. Project City of Cupertino 6-20-78 to File No. i Agreement 6-30-82 2. Contract California 10-1-78 to Depm'tment for 9-28-79 Aging 3. Contract for McKee's Tractor 11-6-78 to Public Work Service 11-21-78 4. " J.C. Lomas Inc. 11-6-78 to 12-6-78 ' 5. " Joe Amaral 12-5-78 to Plumbing 1-9-79 6. " Peninsula Trane 2-5-79 to 4-5-79 7. " Advance 12-5-78 to Engineering 12-20-78 8. " Viking Electric 11-9-78 to 12-4-78 9. " Shaw Interior 11-6-78 to Specialties 1 I-11-78 10." Sanehes Dry Wall 5-25-79 to 6-14-79 11. Agreement Burmah Cabinet 5-30-79 Corporation Destroy 24 Page 6 of I 1 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberts Wolfe Page: 7 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Applic.ation, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit. (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Senior Citizen Center File Number 78-043 1. Contract for A.L. Thiel, Inc. 12-22-78 File No. 2 Public Work to 1-1-79 2. " Shaw Interior 10-24-78 'Specialties to 11-3-78 3. " Harry Murphy Co. 11-27-78 to 12-7-78 4. " Conklin Bros. 2-14-79 to 2-24-79 5. " Burcham Co., Inc. 2-27-79 to 3-9-79 · . 6. " Acropolis Painting 11-6-78 to & Decorating 11-16-78 7. " The Tile Place 2-26-79 to 3-8-79 8. " Joe G. Hemandez 12-5-78 to 12-30-78 9. " Radonich 5-7-79 to Insulation & 5-14-79 Roofing 10. " Neu Bros. Grading 7-19-79 to & Paving, Inc. 9-3-79 11. " B & B Landscape.. 7-12-79 to Contractors, Inc. 8-12-79 12. Agreement D.B. Construction 12-18-80 13." R.G. Smithson 1-9-81' Destroy 24 Page 7 of 11 ,RECORDS INVENTORY FG,..,~ICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Depacm~ent: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 8 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = m be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Memorandum of File Number 78-044, 1. Memorandum City of Cupertino 8-7-78 Understanding Res. 4767 of Between..the City of Understanding Cupertino and Between the Cupertino Employees City of Association 8/7/78 Cupertino and Cupertino Employees Association 2. " " 7-2-79 Res. 5329 3. " " 7-2-80 Res. 5659 4. " " 6-30-81 Res. 5902 5. " " 7-6-82 Res. 6124 6. " " 7-5-83 . . Res. 6371 7. " " 7-2-84 Res. 6631 8. " " 7-1-85 Res. 6792 9. Joint Powers " 12-11-85 Agreement 'Res. 6889 10. Memorandum " 7-1-86 of Understanding Between 'the City of Cupertino and Cupertino Employees Association · Res. 7232 i 1." " 7-1-87 Res. 7534 12." " 7-1-88 Res. 7860 13." " 7-1-89 Destroy 24 lid.age 8 of I 1 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 9 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed · card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Memorandum of File Number 78-044, 14. Memorandum City of Cupertino 7-1-90 Understanding Res. 8160 of Between the City of Understanding Cupertino and Between City Cupertino Employees of Cupertino Association 8/7/78 and Cupertino Continued Employees Association Res. 8412 15." " 7-1-91 Res. 8901 16." " 7-1-93 McClellan Road File Number 78-045, 1. Program of City of Cupertino 7-14-77 Project 78-7 · Res. 4868 Local Agency M.C. Slack Paving Federal Aid Company Safety Improvement Projects 2. City Contract McClellan Rd. 8-21-78 West of Bridge Asphalt Overlay - File Number 78-046 Contract for Public ' Piazza 8-7-78 to 78-20 Maintenance of Work Construction 9-7-78 City Streets Company Midpeninsula Open File Number 78-047, 1. Agreement Midpeninsula 7-17-78 Space District Res. 5920 Open Space District Res. 4963 2." " 4-1-79 Res. 5634 3." " 4-1-81 Res. 5868 4." " 5-17-82 Destroy 24 Page 9 of 11 RECORDS INVENTORY FO .... t~iCROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Deparlment: City Clerk Contact:' Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 10 of 11 - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M -- to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D -- to be destroyed Krzich Pipeline Co. File Number 78-048 Contract L.J. Krzich 9-5-78 HCD Water Line Pipeline Eng. Co, Project 78-11 Inc. Riley's Striping File Number 78-049 Contract Riley's Striping 7-28-78 Service, Inc. Service, Inc. Park Instructors, Fall File Number 78-050 Agreements 1978 Parks & Recreation File Number 78-050.1 Agreements Instructors Winter 1978 Peoples.Construction File Number 78-051 Contract for Public People's 9-29-78 to Co., Inc. Project 78- Work Construction Co., 10-24-78 15 and 78-16 Inc. Clark, Craig and File Number 78-052, 1. Improvement McClellan R6ad 10-9-78 Nancy Binneweg Res. 4813 Agreement Clark Res. 4971 2. " Scenic Avenue 5-1-79 Res. 6323 3. " " 4-26-84 Res. 7150 4. " Dolores Avenue 4-20-87 Wanderer Electric File Number 78-053 1. Contract for Wanderer Electric 11-17-80 Co. Project 78-14 Public Work Inc. to 1-1-81 2. " " 10-17-78 to 11-12- 78 Daniel Duarte - File Number 78-054, Improvement Daniel and Eva 8-10-78 Improvement Res. 3339 Agreement Duarte Agreement Santa Clara Avenue File Number 78-056, Improvement Santa Clara 8-10-78 Associates Res. 3339 Agreement Avenue Associates Destroy 24 Page 10 of 11 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 11 of I l - File Name: Destroy 24 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or most M = to be microfilmed card #) recent date) D = to be destroyed Drummond, Maxine File Number 78-057, 1.' Improvement 10428 S. Foothill 8-10-78 - Deferred Res. 3339 Agreement Blvd. Cupertino Agreement Res. 6804 2. " Carmen Rd. at 4-7-86 Stevens Creek Blvd. John Parham File Number 78-058 Improvement Cupertino Town 11-2-78 Agreement Center McGuire and Heater File Number 78-059 Contract for Public McGuire and 11-17-78 79-5 De Anza Storm Work Heater to 11-27- Drain Improvement 78' Varian Park Storm File Number 78-060 1. Contract for Varian Park Storm 11-27-78 Drain Improvement Public Work Drain to 12-17- Project 79-6 2. " Stevens Canyon 78 Storm Drain 12-22-78 to 1-22-78 Stevenot, Richard G. File Number 78-061, Improvement Santa Paula 9-29-78 Res. 3339 Agreement Avenue A & R Leasing Co. File Number 78-062, Agreement Bianey & Stevens 10-17-78 Undergrounding Res. 4811 Creek Blvd. Utility - Blaney & Stevens Creek " Hosono U. and C. File Number 78-063, Reimbursement Mr. & Mrs. U. '11-9-78 Gifu Restaurant Res. 4837 Agreement Hosono - Gifu Restaurant Mini Storage - D & File Number 78-064 Agreement Mini Storage 11-6-78 R Assoc. Development Blaney Avenue Destroy 24 Page 11 of 11 RECORDS INVENTORY FOt~,dlCROFILMING OR DESTRUCIION · Depamnent: City Clerk Contact: Kimb=ly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 1 of 2 - File Name: Destroy 25 No. (to be used File Name File Number and/or Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter for microfiche Resolution, Ordinance, Permit (or roost M = to be microfilmed card ~ recent date) D -- to be des~oyed General Plan File Number 298 Ordinance 1488 City of Cupertino 3-6-89 Not General Plan- 3-GPA-89 File Number 298, Res. Applications .3-GPA-89 NE Comer of Finch 5-19-89 destroyed- 7843, Res. 4163 and 13-EA-89 Ave. & St. Crk. Blvd. kept by Com. .. Dev. Sept. 1999 ' General Plan- 2-GPA-87 File Number 298 Applications 2-GPA-B7 Old Monta Vista Area 7-6-87 and 1 -GPA-87 · . ='. =..' . =.=.:.'..~ City of Cupertino 1-Z-84 File # 298, Res. 2504, Ordinance 1270 Old Monte Vista 2-27-84 · .' .=............. 2505, 2506, 2507 -'". ' NOt':.. '::?":' General Plan Amendntent File Number 298, Res. Apps. I-GPA-87 & Citywide 3-7-88 destroY~l'.~ ::i. I-GPA-87 7436, Res. 4036 52~EA-87 Urg. Ord. kept bY' cora~:- 1440, Ext. Urz. Ord. .Der,' Sept.'..:.;;". 1438 1999 ..' · · Not:='. '.:'"'.?:: I-GPA-85 File Number 298, Res. Applications -GPA-85 Citywide 2-3-86 des~l:~'.!::.'. 2762, 6761,6762, 2763 and 68-EA-85 kept by Devi 19~9 ...' :"" ':-.:: · Not .":' :=:. :. General Plan Amend. - File Number 298.1, Res. Application I-GPA-83 Inspiration Heights, 3-25-83 des~l'oyed ~: Inspiration Heights 1- 2387, Res. 2388 Lot 309 - kept by Corn: GPA-83 Dev. $~t. 1999 ... . Great Western Savings File Number 304 · . '. ' .... :' Architectural & Si~e File # 306, Res. 1697, Ord. 1630, 1596, 1594 City of Cupertino 6-15-92 Approval Committee 8683, 8675, 8055 Destroy 25 Page 1 of 2 RECORDS INVENTORY FOk ,~IICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION: Department: City Clerk Contact:. Kimberly smith or Roberta WOlfe Page: 2 of 4- File Name: Destroy 27 .. "..' · No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M -- to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D -- to be date) destroyed Bingo Permits 123.1 1985- D 1986 Landscaping/Trees 126 1977- D Water Conservation 1986 BAS Homes, Inc. 135 1986 D " Regnart Canyon 137 1979- D = =: 1983 .':'".':~::i~::. :": Vallco Park 146 Application 6-U-73 1975- D ~ :...: Res. 3896, 3903, 38971-Z-83 1984 '".. '.': 14-U-80 · ".'".~.~' 6-U-73 : · · I-TM-80 '::..~.....: · HC-51,075 ..'. :..'.. 16-U-78 · · '" 20-U-77 . :.' Quarries 153 1986- D :.. 1987 .'.'. $obrnto Berg/4 Phase155 Application 4-U-82 10001N. De Anza 1977- D · .: ':"' Apple (Nan Allen 46-U-85 Blvd. 1987 .;'.? .:'..i. School) 18-U-85 (Amended) . .'. ASAC-51,610.1 : HC-51,410.7 · ~ :':... HC-51,392.7 · 4-U-78 · :,:.?:':....." ':': Building Department 159 1987 D -4-- Destroy27.rtf RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Roberta Wolfe Page: 3 of 4- File Name: Destroy 27 No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Civic Center Parking 170 Civic Center 1983- D Lot Expansion Parking Lot 1985 Conversion 78-2 Expansion Project 83-53 16-U-83 and 5-TM- 83 Memorial Park 177 1973- D Storage building, 1985 tennis court lighting, closing hours Street Maintenance, 249 1981- D Project 88-116 1988 Annual Overlay, 249 1988 D Project 88-115 Foothill Blvd. 249 1984- D Overlay Project 88- 1988 103 Annual Overlay 249 1987 D Project 87-108 Slurry Seal Project 249 1986 D 86-112 Slurry Seal Project 249. 1985 D 85-101 Annual Overlay 249 1983 D Project 83-52 Destroy27.rtf RECORDS INVENTORY FOK ,dlCROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or'Robexta Wolfe Page: 4 of 4- File Name: Destroy 27 No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Annual Overlay 249 1986 D Project 86-111 Weed Abatement 281 1992- D 1996 Auditors 330 1978- D 1987 Committees and 378 General information 1984- D Commissions 1996 Rent Relief 499 1984- D 1987 Election November 949 1984 D 1984 Election 1699 1992 D Destroy27.rtf PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I. ADMINISTRATION FILES (Destroy) ABAG 1995 1996 1997 1998 ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS AGREEMENTS FOR TURF MAINTENANCE (CUSD) (blank agreement, no dates) ALCOHOL TAX INITIATIVE B.A.P.R.c.B.M.C. (1982-1989) BIKE LANES (1976) CHART OF ACCOUNTS CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS 1981 - 1991 CLUBS & ORGANIZATIONS - List of (1982) CLUBS & ORGANIZATIONS - DeAnza Optimist Club (1982) COMMUNITY CONTACTS PROGRAM 1989 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES C.P..R.S. Great America and Marine World (1980's) C.P.R.S. Affiliations Commission C.P.R.S. Trust Account # 980-206-39 (1980's) DEPARTMENT Staff Retreat - October 1991 ." EMERGENCY PROCEDURES (1977-1992)" FILING SYSTEM AND INDEX TO FILES - (1974/90) HISTORY OF RECREATION HOLIDAY OPEN HOUSE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (Legislative' Bulletin) (1991-1993) LEAGUE OF CITIES SPEECH (10/84) OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES (1972-1973) OFFICE EQUIPMENT IBM WARRANTY OFFICE EQUIPMENT SONY WARRANTY OPEN SPACE ORGANIZATION(1990) .. PERSONNEL REQUISITIONS (1986-1990) PUBLICITY RELEASES RECREATION SCHEDULE (1973) RESOLUTIONS No. 98-138 (1988) (user fees) RETREATS AND CONFERENCE CENTERS (1988) SURVEYS-LOCAL PARKS & REC. AGENCIES IN CALIF. TELEPHONES/VOICE MAIL TRAINING SEMINARS Deslroy28 Page 1 of 2 ~,..j ~ VENDORS VOLUNTEERS ( 1991) WEEKEND AND HOLIDAY STAND-BY (1975-1990) WHEELCHAIR GAMES (1983) WILDLIFE PROTECTION HABITAT (1990) Deslroy28 Page 2 of 2 RECORDS ]NVE~ORY FOR M~CROFILMI~G OR'DESTRUCTION. "'. Department: City clerk ContaCt: Kimberly Smitii °r'Rob~ W0ffe./,::')' '.' Page: 1 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 29 No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or' Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Pasadena Granada 1251 27-U-89 and 38- 1990 D Group EA-89 Tree Value center project .. '.'~ '."=' Pasadenn Gxanndn 1251 Res. 7955 - 1988-89 D " ' ·· '"".. :.~ "'":,:' Group quitclaim deed ..' .:..:.. ': 26-U-88 · ':,.::: .. :. ingress/egress; maintenance Destroy 29 Page 1 of 9 RECORDS INVE~ORY FOk ,~tiCROFII2VHNG OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact:" Kimberly smith'or Roberta WO~e Page: 2 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 29 No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Sislc, James 40-U-87 1985-92 D 4-U-88 2-TM-90 5-Z-90 Res. 6685 - parcel :i~. ' · Res. 6906- final plan · .' Res. 7380- final · . plan ·" '= = Res. 7381 - grant of · ' =" Res. 7382 - grant of easement · .. Res. 7457- parcel Res. 7465 - lot line · . adjustment ='=..'.i Res. 7495 - lot line .... adjustment =. Res. 7549- quitclaim deed Res. 7550- final plan Res. 7563- ~ ..... improvement of _.~ Destroy 29. Res. I~9 2-°f 9 quitclaim deed Res. 7624 - lot line RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contact:' ~ly Smith or Roborta WOlfe'" Page: 3 of 9 - File Name: De~troy 29 ....... : No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D -- to be date) destroyed Varian Park/Three 100 Res. 6536 - Grant 1991-94 D Oaks Park Deed Re~. 6566 - Grant Deed · Re~. 6566 - Grant .. Deed · ' · Res. 6578 - Grant · · Deed .. Res. 9114 - Lease · ' ...... =.'=.=" Automobiles 102 Pool car mileage . 1987-89 D '. .logs, etc. ..'. City Manager 104 1991 D "=' Weekly Notes Affinnntive Action 121 Res. 3833 - 1984-94 D adopting plan Trees - care, 126 81,004.151 1990-96 D ..: ..= preservation, removal Ord. 1543- ......="= of significant trees regulations for care · ...== ~= =.=~ and removal of trees =~. Ord. 1573 - care =. and removal ..... Ord. 1715 -~ tree · " removal procedure Destroy 29 Page 3 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOk ·alCROFH.MING OR DESTRUCTFiON Department: City Clerk contact~ KimberlY Smith orRoberta W°lfe. Page:4of9 " ' ' "?.'"' -File Name: Destroy 29 No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be roicrofiche Ordinance, roost microfilmed card #) recent D ='to be date) destroyed santa Clara Co. 128 Ord. 1501 - steel- 1987-93 D Health Dept. ' jawed traps Ord. 1722- Res. 8156- Hazardous roaterials Res. 8519- animal "":.i.'.. Regnart Canyon 137 Ord. 1659- 1994-95 D · 1-Z-94 \ Destroy 29 Page 4 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION · Department: City Clerk Contact.:.' KimberlY Smith or Robertn WOffe . Page:· 5 of 9 - File Name:. Destroy 29 .... '. ::::: · No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject,. Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application,'Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Vallco Park 146 31-U-86 1975-92 D 51,785.1 -. ASAC 51,908.1 & - '= ' Res. 925.42- ..... Res. 4916- ..:. ordering vacation "'.:. "' Res. 6995 - parcel map i?. i": Res. 7147 - grant of ~. Res. 7530- support '.'" . :..: for cai train shuttle · ' .... '. :. '. Res. 7626 - shuttle · ' :.. :=.::" agreement, shuttle ~ Deslroy 29 :. :' Res. ]~ll}~ 5of 9 Il ..eement Caltrans RECORDS INVENTORY FOR ~dlCROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION Department: City Clerk Contaot: K/mberly Smith or Robertn Wolfe Page: 6 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 29 . No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed 'card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Appeals 151 · Ord. 1672 - appeals 1994-95 D of ndministrative decisions Special meeting 1.52.1 1993 D · ...notices · ':" City Council minutes 152 1996 D "'.." ='..: :' City Council minutes 1997 D 152 ~.."=':=... Quarries - Kaiser 153 Res. 7809 - lot line 1993-96 D '" Cement adjustment .. Res. 7854- ~.' agreement, storm :.:.: . drain inlet Res. 7855 - grant of " Diocese lawsuit 1993 D " Cancellation of taxes 164 1987-91 D Press and public 173 1985-89 D relations Activity report 175 1993 D .=. Memorial Park 177 Concession sales, 1986-96 D · .'.' tennis court lighting =':: Willinmson Act 180 General info., 1977-93 D : : · correspondence \ Destroy 29 Page 6 of 9 RECORDS INVENTORY FOR'MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION-:' .' 'i Department: City Clerk Contact:. Kimberly Smith Or Roberta W~ffO '.'.:. ~..' Page: 7 of 9 - File Name: Destroy 29 :. '..' ~/'i.:'.' .' No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Federal surplus 183 1994 D property program Bus shelter 184 Res. 9446 - 1995-96 D ... agreement for : . . .,. transit shelter. :"' .... "' advertising program ..... ..~,i.~i i.~?..:'. Zoning-play 187 81.155 1994 D ..:.:. i..'::.!..:.:..'I ';:: structures Ord. 1654 · " i .i'~i..'.~ii,:'- .:... i:.'.::.i Zoning- recreational 187. 81.150 1994 D vehicles Ord. 1650 Destroy 29 Page 7 of 9 , RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILkIING'OR DESTRU~ '~ ' .'"= Department: City Clerk Contact:.Kimberly Smith br Rob~' WO~.. Page: 8 of 9 - File· Name; DestrOy 29 ="' . No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed '" Zoning 187 80,052.2 - day care 1982-96 D :'.' Ord. 1374- · .=:. repealing orda. .:' '~.?:" Ord. 1356- · :. moratorium · ~;'~ .... zones ....... ~=.:.=~': conferred · . =..':' development ==..=-: review bodies · .. ?..'. Ord. 1621 - 1-Z-93 - Kimin RECORDS INVE~ORY FOR MI~OFILMING OR'DE$~CTI~'=.~'i == :' '..'.' .... ' · Department: City Clerk Contact: ~berly smith °rR°~.W°~i:=..:= .... ". : " Page: 9 ofg' File Name: Destroy 29 .: .....'../:==.:.:.?i=..... No. (to be File Name File Number and/or Subject, Address or Date Enter used for Resolution, Application, Permit Location ranges (or M = to be microfiche Ordinance, most microfilmed card #) recent D = to be date) destroyed Planning dept. 190 Res. 6762 - land 1986-94 D character element of .' ..'. =.::::.?:=;. :.::.:....= Grnnts of easements 199 Resolutions 1989-93 D · · , land, compliance ' ""= ......... (9715139 · · .:." · ', K559Page879) .... Covenant for ".i'.' ':'~. ensement agreement .: :.: :'.. to grant future : '. :' .'. K559page 876) ~ Destroy 29 Page 9 of 9 -V--, ~ .' City [t~11 lO3OO Torr~ Avenue · ~ Cul~rfino, CA 95014-~255 (40g) ?77-~262 of FAX:'(408) 777-3366 Cupertino SUMMARY Agenda Item ~ Date: Sept. 20, 1999 Subject: Approval of recommendation fi'om Telecommunications Commission for awarding one public access grant. Background: At its meeting Sept. 1, the Telecommunications Commission reviewed an application for a public nexess grant in the nmount of $250. The commission has a $2,000 grants budget, and funding for such projects throughout the year come ~om this source. The' grant proposal was submitted by Hema Kundargi, to offset costs for her award-winning Indian vegetarian cooking show, which is aired twice weekly on the Cupertino public access channel. '-' Following discussion of the project, the commission unanimously approved the grant request. Recommendation: The City Council approve the recommendation from the Telecommunications Commission to award a grant in the amount of $250 to Hema Kundargi, access producer. Submitted By: Donna Krey Do Public Information Officer City Manager Cupertino Telecommunications Commission GRANT APPLICATION FORM Preamble. Public access producers wishing to apply for grants up to $250 for progrsmmin~ that meets the stated goals must complete the application below and submit it to the Public Information Officer, City of Cupe?2v.o, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014. Please submit eight copies of your completed application. Dendline for AppHention: October 15 of each year Describe your project, including the number of progrnm.~ you wish to produce and their length. Include a timeline and budget for the project. Use the Guidelines for Preparing a Gram Budget in the Grant Guidelines and Grant Application Procedure. As noted in the Budget Guidelines, gr~nt~ are not imended to be used for .salaries, wages or for a produeer's persOnal gaill. Th~ Commi-~sion will comid~r applications that show a clear benefit to the Cupertino community. Grant aDnlication for Indian Vegetarian Gourmet Indian vegetarian gourmet is a cooking show which is aired twice a week on the Cupertino Public access channel. The show has won the 1998 WAVE award in the non- professional instructional category Since there is no kitchen facilities available in the studio the taping is done in my kitchen. For better, programming quality we started using the remote cable car. For transporting this equipment a truck (with.a ramp) needs to be rented. I would like to ask a grant for covering the cost of the truck rental. My cooking show cassettes are now available in the Cupertino Public library. According to the librarian, they are very popular cassettes. Truck rental $250.00 ($50.00 per trip for next five shows) Total $250.00 I plan to do a show' every month. I have a sponsor to cover the grocery cost for the show. I firmly believe that the grant will help me. defray the cost for producing an excellent quality show. Than. king yo.u, Hema Kundargi P.S. I have included a paper clipping, about the show from the local Indian magazine 'India Currents'.4' Cucino Amore~ Jacques Pepin's Kitchen, Baking with Jtdia--the list is endless, espe- ciall~ for those keen food addicts who are glued to their TVs on weekends. And now there is Hema Kundargi's dian Vegetarian Gourmet,~ a · ! lng show on the Community Ch..de · ~ Network and TCI cable channels :~ from San Jose to Menlo Park. The show recently won the 1998 WAVE (Western Access Video Excellence) Award. Poona bom Kundargi has sim- plified traditional Indian recipes for the American kitch'en. 'I've western- ized the Indian r~cipes by using sup- · '~4 plies from the regular grocery stores and short-cut techniques,' says Kundargi. She also teaches at Draegers Culinary Center in San Francisco, where top chefs come and teach. Appointed in March 1998 to the Fine Aris Commission of Cupertino, Kundargi helps promote, encourage, and foster a~t in the city. "To educate the public about your culture, art and pass the torch to the succeeding generations is the biggest contribu- ......... tion to the society by an immigrant,' Santa Clara Rose Society, Kundargi has won manp prizes. A busy lady-she has a~ll~II many palates! [] J 0 Y C I= ~3I=M I~- E.gl L E IN -)assage to Inc a ~A~ WAY in World Health o~ p~ for - Organization he spice~ am- ~"'~ - h~ s~ted ~at nd ~ ~ .~.: ~ ~ ~e s. indiaff ~d -. most healthful :alifornia/ln- ~d ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ Hi~ma~ ~w ~ople, fo~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~g ~ ~ost among ~ ~..~ '~ fi~, ~ ~em celebfi~ ? · ~t~ ~' ~, i~ ~ hefs Jeremiah '~ }~- ~ ~, ~. X ~, ~g ~,. ~ad~l low rudhomme, ~ ~iremath ~. ~ credits the ne f~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ of Tower says, ~ ~'~ ~ =~ ~ &e ln&~ cu~ ~ ~d m~r ~ U.S. coo~. In ' ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ . addition, al- ~ ~ ~ ~ ' erally used in 1st array of' ~~m~ o~' : ~n ~ ~e ~g ~ ~' One hurdle ~ F~, ~ough, ~ ~at ~ =o~.= ~ ~ ~eremiah ~0v i~ cookboo~.' ~ ~it~ ~ ~d ~- '~ ~ ~ did away ~g teacher ~ ~d ~ ~ ~" ingredients, the.pi~a0v~ ~out inco~ - .Hiremath is t~g ~ ~ ., ~r~ng to d~ at S~fs a~d ~ ~ ~ ~ insmllod a So sure is ~~ ~ do~ '~ tando0r. mt he &d a~ ~& ~e ~ ~ ~'~ ~ h~ nd~r, ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ dm~~N~,~~ m~~N~~ : ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~t ~ Me~o ~ .,~ V~~' ' . lO~n~~e~e~ ~~~~~- ~ed lemon; an Indio/~nm She ~ ~ ~ ~1~, ~ ~,'~ ~ ~/Mex c~aaon ~ ~ch~h~e ~.~.~.u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ CITY OF CUPERTINO Communi~ Development Department 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 Phone (408) 777-3308 Fax (408) 777-3333 SUMMARY Agenda No.: ~ Agenda Date: September 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Amendment to Resolution No. 99-209; Resolution' of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Approving and Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement for Payment of Costs Between the City, The Cupertino Redevelopment Agency, and The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. DISCUSSION: The City Council and Redevelopment Agency previously approved a contract and scope of services with Keyser Marston Associates, which includes consulting services for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Subsequent to approval, City staff requested that the traffic analysis be added to the EIR work. In addition, the EIR consultant requested that two optional tasks, hazardous materials and cultural and historic resources, be added. The total increase in compensation is $21,070, for a total of $76,020 for the EIR. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendments. Enclosures: Proposed amendments Resolution No. 99-271 Resolution No. RA-99-10 Robert Cowan B Director of Community Development City Manager g:tplanning/pdreport/cc/Amendreso99-209 6 _[. RESOLUTION NO. 99-271 RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AND AUTHOR/ZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS BETWEEN THE AGENCY, THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND JG CUPERTINO LLC WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City of Cupertino an amendment to the Agreement for Payment of Costs Between the Agency, the City of Cupertino and JG Cupertino LLC; and WHEREAS, the amendment provides for an amendment to services provided by Keyser Marston Associates; and WHEREAS, the provisions of the amendment have been reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city of Cupertino hereby approves thc amendment dated September 10,. 1999 and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Cupertino City Council' this 20th day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk ' Mayor RESOLUTION NO. RA-99-10 RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND 'AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS BETWEEN THE AGENCY, THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND JG CUPERTINO LLC WHEREAS, there has been presented to the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency an amendment to the Agreement for Payment of Costs Betewen the Agency, the City Cupertino and JG Cupertino LLC; and WHEREAS, the amendment pro/tides for an amendment to services provided by Keyser Marston Associates; and WHEREAS, the provisions of the amendment have been reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. .-- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 'that the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency hereby approves the amendment dated September 10, 1999 and authorizes the Chairman and the Secretary to execute said agreement on behalf of the Agency. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency this 20t~ day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the Rede3elopment Agency AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: Secretary Chairman, Redevelopment Agency K E y S E R M A R S T O N A S S O C I A T E S I N C. A~wsoas la: COLOEN CA~EWA~ CoMMoNs SF-? I 5 19~ R~,~ ~,~ REDEVELOPME~ ~ PACIFIC AVENUE MALL A~RDABLE HO SAN FRANCISCO, CALI~RNIA 94] ] ] ECONOMIC DEVELc...~ PHONS: 415/398-3050 FINAL IMPA~ FAX: 415/397-5065 IN~STRU~ FINANCE E-MAIL: kmasf~kmainc.com VALUA~ON AND Ws~ S~TE: http://www.kmainc.com LmGA~N SUP~RT SaN ~1~,4NCI5C0 A. JER.~Y TIMOTHY C. KELLY ~(ATE EARLE FUNK D~NiSE E. COrdLEY MAeTHA N. PACKAeD September 10, 1999 Los ANGEL£S C^LWa E. HOLUS, II Ms. Giddy Wordell, AICP City Planner City of Cupertino GEe*LO M. T~UMELE Department of Community Development Ro~T I. Wm~ORE 10300 Torte Avenue eAUL ¢. Cupertino, Califomia 95014 Re: Amendment to July 19, 1999 Agreement for Adoption of a Redevelopment Project for Vallco Fashion Park Dear Ciddy: Pursuant to the City's request for Fehr & Peers Associates to conduct a supplementary traffic and parking analysis for the Vallco Fashion Park, as set forth in their August 30th proposal to Wags. taft and Associates, .and in accordance with Wagstaff and Associates letter dated September 3rd to the City of Cupertino, we hereby request the City to amend the above contract to include Fehr & Peers work scope, and to amend the maximum compensation by $21,070 for this work effort. In addition, Wagstaff & Associates has requested authorization to proceed on two "optional" work items identified in their August 31st letter to Keyser Marston in an amount of $950 for each optional task. Therefore, the total amount of the contract amendment requested is $22,970, which brings the total maximum compensation to $177,170. Please call if you need any additional information. Sincerely KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Martha N. Packard Enclosures Wagstaff and Associates Uriah and Environmental Planning ~12 Ninth Street, Suite 5 Berkeley, California 94710 (510) 540-0303 FAX (510) 540-4788 · September 3, 1999 Ms. Ciddy Wordell City Planner City of Cupertino Community Development Department 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: REVISED WORK SCOPE AND BUDGET-VALLCO EIR Dear Ciddy: Attached for your use is the September 3, 1999 revision to our original June 8, 1999 Proposal for Services (work scope and budget) for the Vallco Fashion Park Redevelol3ment Proiect EIR. The revised proposal is labelled as Subcontract Exhibit "A" for attachment to our subcontract with Keyser Marston. We are now completing this revised subcontractor agreement with Keyser Marston. The' prOposed revisions include: · (1) incorporation of the August 30, 1999 Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc., work scope and budget ($21,070); (2) incorporation of the "Public Health and Safety" and "Cultural and Historic Resources" tasks, which were described in our original June 8, 1999 Proposal for Services as "optional," into the work scope ($950 + 950 -- $1,900); and (3) revisions to the "Project Overview" section of the proposed to reflect our most recent understanding of the project. As indicated on page VI--3 of the revised proposal (Exhibit 2: Revised Cost Estimate for EIR), the revised Total Estimated Fee for the EIR is $76,020, derived as follows: .o- · Original Total Estimated Fee (June 8, 1999): $53,050 · Added Fehr & Peers traffic/parking study: 21,070 · Added Public Health and Safety (haz. mat.) section: 950 · Added Cultural and Historic Resources section: 950 · Revised Total Estimated Fee $76,020 Ms. Ciddy Wordell September 3. 1999 Page 2 Please call with any questions or additional information needs. Sincerely, FF AND ASSOCIATES /John Wagstaff JW:sr~6 cc: Diane Chambers, Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. r SUBCONTRACT EXHIBIT "A": PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES TO TIlE CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE VALLCO FASHION PARK REDEVELOPMENT PLAN _ Submitted by WAGSTAFF AND ASSOCIATES Urban and Environmental Planners in Association with Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc., Transportation Consultants Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., Noise Quality Consultants Donald Ballanti, Air Quality Management Consultant r September 3. 1999 WP51 tS961MISCtPRO-COV. EXA r Wags'taft and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I CONTENTS PaQe I. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND EIR APPROACH I--1 II. RECOMMENDED WORK SCOPE II--1 III. PROPOSED EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS III--1 IV. PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE IV--1 V. TEAM MANAGEMENT AND KEY PERSONNEL V--1 VI. FEE ESTIMATE VI--1 VII. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE CONSULTANT TEAM VII--1 VIII. REFERENCES VIII--I' IX, RELEVANT WORK EXPERIENCE IX-1 X. RESUMES OF ASSIGNED PERSONNEL X--1 Exhibits r 1. Basic Project Data I--2 r 2. Estimated Total Contract Fee VI-3 r Attachment: August 30, 1999 Proposal--Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Proiect EIR-- r Supplemental Traffic and Parkincl Analyses; Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. WP51 ~596iMI$C~PRO-CO V. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Su0contract Exhibit City of Cupertjllo Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page II WP51t596tMISClPRO-CO V. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I-1 I. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING'AND EIR APPROACH A. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Richard E. Jacobs Group, owners of the existing Vallco Fashion Park shopping center in downtown Cupertino, are proposing to modify and expand the center to increase its competitiveness in today's retail environment. The City of Cupertino Redevelopment Agency is proposing to facilitate the shopping center improvement program through adoption of an r associated redevelopment plan. The redevelopment plan facilitated project actions are r itemized in Exhibit 1. r The existing shopping center includes: (1) an enclosed approximately 1,137,140-square-foot enclosed mall'with three anchor department stores, a number of secondary mall stores, and an ice rink; (2) approximately 18,460 square feet of fringe commercial development comprised of two sit-down restaurants (El Torrito and TGI Fridays); and (3) an associated parking inventory of surface and "deck" (parking structure) spaces. The proposed shopping Center redevelopment plan includes the following modifications and additions to the center: r -. the addition of two more anchor department stores of 244,014 and 120,000 square feet each to the enclosed central mall area; r , the addition of an approximately 2,986-seat multiscreen cinema, new 10,000-square-foot r restaurant, and new 150-room hotel within the fringe area of the center; and · associated modifications to the center's surface and "deck" parking provisions to provide r a total of 6,371 parking spaces (i.e., a retail parking ratio of 4.00 cars per 1,000 square feet). Under state redevelopment law, implementation of the Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan will require the Redevelopment Agency to prepare and adopt a series of five documents: (1) a Preliminary Plan, (2) a Preliminary Report, (3) the Redevelopment Plan, (4) an Environmental Impact Report, and (5) a Final Report. This proposal for services by Wagstaff and Associates describes a recommended work scope, time schedule, and cost estimate for the preparation, processing, and certification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) component of the redevelopment program in compliance with CEQA and California Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code section 33333.3). In addition .to the redevelopment plan. implementation of the project may also require City approval of a development agreement amendment, a use permit amendment, and an WP511PRO- 1.EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A"' ' City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Pad< Redevelopment Plan Elfl Septemloer 3, 1999 Page I--2 Exhibit 1 VALLCO FASHION PARK REDEVELOPMENT PLAN--BASIC PROJECT DATA Redevelopment Plan: Redevelopment Plan: Location Existincl Initial Phase Future Phase Enclosed Mall: Sears w/Auto 280,185 280,185 '280,185 JC Penney 202,360 202,360 202,360 Macy's 176,962 176,962 176,962 Mall Stores 456,395 345,691 345,691 Ice dnk 21,238 19,798 19,798 Subtotal: 1,137,140 1,024,996 1,024,996 Mall Fringe: TGI Fddays 8,960 8,960 8,960 El Todto 9,500 9,500 9,500 Subtotal: 18,460 18,460 18,460 Modifications: New Department Store (Dillard) 244,014 244,014 New Cinema 65,000 65,000 New Restaurant 10,000 10,000 Future Hotel 45,000 150 rooms Future Department Store II 120,000 Subtotal: -- 319,014 484,014 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 1,155,600 1,362,470 1,527,470 (Gross Leasable Area~) Parking provided 4,806 5,7112 6,3712 Parking ratio 4.24 4.25 4.23 Initial Phase · Add department store (Dillard), food court, restaurant and additional area over Wolfe Road · Infill lower level-Dillard to JC Penney · Remove lower level mall stores--Sears to Macy's Future Phase: . Add additional department store, hotel and parking SOURCE: Richard E. Jacobs Group, August 1999 ~ All floor area square footages are gross leasable area (GLA), which excludes covered and uncovered pedestrian concourses, mechanical equipment areas, public lavatories, truck docks, interior loading areas, the ice dnk, security facilities, and the shopping center offices. = Parking total includes 600 cinema stalls; retail parking provided at a ratio of 4.0/1,000 square feet (ice rink excluded). wP51 tPRO. I. EXA r Wagstatf and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A' City of Cupertino , Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I-3 associated development plan. The EIR will also be designed to provide the necessary CEQA documentation for all of these anticipated approval requirements. B. EIR PREPARATION APPROACH AND OBJECTIVES 1. Proclram EIR Format Following the advice of the redevelopment team legal counsel, the Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR will be prepared as a program EIR under the authority of CEQA Guidelines section. 15168; i.e., it will address the aggregate effects of the series of related actions (the "program") that would be facilitated by the redevelopment plan. The program EIR will describe the likely cumulative environmental consequences of full realization of the redevelopment plan goal to foster blight elimination and economic development in the Vallco Fashion Park shopping center precinct, plus any anticipated offsite housing or Other improvement programs associated with the redevelopment .program. 2. EIR Scope It is anticipated that a careful and thorough Initial Study exercise at the outset by the EIR consultant will permit focussing the program EIR on the following specific issues: · land use and visual impacts, · population and housing impacts, · transportation and parking impacts, · public services impacts (specifically police, fire, and emergency medical services; project impacts on schoo.ls, sewer, and water services will probably be determined to be less than significant in the Initial Study); · air quality impacts (the anticipated level of growth and associated traffic increment will trigger the need for an air quality impact analysis); and · noise impacts (the projected Vallco redevelopment-related traffic increase along major downtown streets will be sufficient to require a noise impact analysis). Depending upon existing site conditions, the Initial Study may also determine that the proposed Vallco mall and surrounding site modifications warrant evaluation of associated geotechnical, drainage, public health and safety (hazardous materials), and/or cultural resources impacts. These particular analysis tasks are therefore identified in this proposed EIR scope as optional items. WP511P RO- I. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A"" City of Cupertino . Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I--4 3. Use of Existin~l Data In preparing the Vallco Fashion Park Redevelo0ment Plan EIR, Wagstaff and Associates will rely on information contained in the 1993 City of Cupertino General Plan Master EIR, and on data from site-specific traffic and other studies currently being or recently conducted by.the C~ty. C. SPECIFIC EIR OBJECTIVES The assessment program set forth in this proposal is designed to prepare a program EIR that achieves the following specific objectives: a. Fully informs the Redevelopment .Agency, City decision makers, other affected taxing agencies, and the public, of the redevelopment plan program and the environmental consequences if the various proposed redevelopment actions are implemented; b. Provides the CEQA documentation necessary to support ~ull processing of the Vallco Fashion Park redevelopment plan, development agreement amendment, use permit amendment, and development plan; · c. Is internally consistent with other relevant redevelopment plan documents (e.g., the Preliminary Plan, Preliminary Report, etc.); d. Makes efficient use of existing background information from the City/Agency and owner/ applicant; e. Provides a comprehensive and clear project description, including overall redevelopment plan actions, including anticipated specific development plan oharacteristics proposed by the Richard E. Jacobs Company, any associated offsite housing or other improvement assistance activities, required jurisdictional approvals, and anticipated implementation timing; f. Describes appropriate significance criteria for each impact section, based on the latest CEQA Guidelines, pertinent City policies, and common practice; g. Describes the land use and planning issues associated with the project, including project compatibility with internal, adjacent, and surrounding uses; h. Describes the visual implications of the project, including potential impacts of the proposed new department store, cinema, and parking structure designs; i. With the assistance of Fehr & Peers, Inc., describes the impacts of the project on future transportation, circulation, and parking characteristics in and around the Vallco Fashion WP515PRO- I.EXA · r Wagstaff and Associates Sul~contract Exhibit City of Cupertino VaJJco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I--5 r Park project area, including impacts due to displacement of existing parking, project-related r peak period traffic changes, and parking demands associated with the proposed additional retail and cinema uses, and cinema patron drop-off and pick-up activity along the cinema's Vallco Parking frontage; j. Describes the local and regional air quality impacts associated with project-generated traffic increases, based on the impact assessment guidelines and modeling requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; k. Describes the noise implications of the project, including the noise effects of project- related traffic volume increases along principal local travel routes; I. Describes project and cumulative implications for future public services provisions and needs, including additional demands for police, fire protection, and emergency medical service needs; m. If determined necessary during the Initial Study process: · Describes the soils and geology impacts of project buildout, including the implications of potential seismic shaking and other geologic and soil factors and constraints; and/or · Describes the public health and safety implications of project buildout, including potentials for construction pedod exposure to hazardous materials and conditions (asbestos, lead, contaminated soils, etc.); and/or · Describes the potential impacts of the project on identified or possible cultural and historic resources underlying or adjacent to the project site; n. Describes the relationship of the proposed project to relevant adopted local and regional plans; o. Includes identification and comparative evaluation of a realistic range of project alternatives' (to be identified in consultation with City and Agency staff and Keyser Marston), possibly including modifications to the proposed shopping center modifications/expansion program, one or more modified redeveloPment area boundary configurations, and/or a modified combination of redevelopment actions; p. Recommends a set of realistic mitigation measures as warranted to reduce or avoid all identified adverse impacts; and q. Includes an easy-to-use impact and mitigation summary table linked with codinc~ to the main EIR text and follow-up Mitigation Monitoring Checklist; WP51iPRO- t. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Ext~ibit 'A" City bt Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I--6 r. Provides for City/Agency compliance with state mitigation monitoring requirements (CEQA section 21081. .6), including a concise, coded checklist indicating monitoring responsibility, monitoring timing, and implementation verification needs, with qodin.q to directly relate the checklist to the EIR and the City's statement of findings. D. SUMMARY OF EIR PREPARATION TASKS AND SCHEDULE Our recommended work program would produce an administrative draft EIR in nine weeks (45 · working days) foil°wing City/Agency authorization to proceed and receipt of all relevant background information; and would consist of the .following nine tasks (detailed descriptions of each task are provided in the next section, RECOMMENDED WORK PROGRAM): TASK I. INITIAL SCOPING AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Initial Staff Meeting .B. Public Scoping Meeting (optional) C. Initial Field Surveys D. Initial Data Collection and Review E. Project Description F. Clarification of Key Issues and Concerns G. Completion of Initial Study Checklist and NOP TASK I1. DESCRIPTION OF SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATIONS. A: Land Use and Planning B. Visual Factors C. Traffic, Circulation, and Parking D. Air Quality E. · Noise F. Public Services G. Soils and .Geology (optional) H. Public Health and Safety I. Cultural and Historic Resources TASK III. RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS A. City of Cupertino General Plan B. Pertinent Regional Plans TASK IV. CEQA-REQUIRED ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS A. Growth-Inducing Effects B... Unavoidable Adverse Effects C. Irrev.ersible Environmental Changes WP511P RO- 1. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I--7 D. Cumulative Impacts E. Effects Found Not to be Significant TASK V. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION A. No Project B. Alternative Project Layout C. Alternative Renovation Program (variations on proposed new uses, e.g., larger cinema/less retail or smaller cinema, more retail, etc.) D. Modified Redevelopment Area Boundaries TASK VI. PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT EIR A. Administrative Draft EIR B. Screen Draft EIR C. Draft El R TASK VII. PREPARATION OF THE FINAL EIR ADDENDUM A. Administrative Draft Final EIR Addendum: Response-to-Comments B. Final EIR Addendum: Response-to-Comments/Revisions to the. Draft EIR TASK VIII. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST TASK IX. MEETINGS AND HEARINGS WP51tPRO, 1.EXA Wagstaff and Associates Sul:)comract Exh/Dit City of Cupertirlo Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I--8 ~ '/7 WP$1~PRO~ 1.EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A' City of Cupertino , Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page I1-1 II. RECOMMENDED WORK PROGRAM The following tasks will be undertaken by the EIR consultant. An Administrative Draft EIR will be submitted to the City/Agency within nine weeks (45 working days).from contract execution and receipt of all relevant background information, A detailed schedule is included in Section III of this proposal. TASK I. INITIAL SCOPING AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Initial Staff Meetin(3 Upon City/Agency authorization to proceed, an initial meeting will be held with City and Redevelopment Agency staff, the EIR consultant team principal-in-charge and project manager, and if the Agency desires, the redevelopment consultant and/or legal counsel to discuss and refine the EIR preparation approach, work scope, alternatives, schedule, and information needs. B. Public Scol3inq Meetincl (optional) If requested by the City/Agency, Wagstaff and Associates will attend a public scoping meeting to assist staff in describing the EIR process and the environmental issues raised by the project, and to solicit public comment on the EIR scope. C. Initial Field Surveys The project site and its surrounding environs will be driven and walked to identify existing conditions relevant to the project and its potential impacts. D. Initial Data Collection and Review Relevant data and analyses available at the Cupertino Department of Community. DeveloPment, pertinent information from other appropriate sources, and background information from the applicant, will be collected and reviewed. E. Prolect Description The objectives and characteristics of the proposed Vallco Fashion Park redevelopment plan will be described to the extent needed for adequate evaluation of environmental impacts. Using text, tables, and graphics, the description will provide a clear illustration of the WP51 t5961MISCtPRO.2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Sutx:ontract Exhibit City of Cupertino . Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR SeptemDer 3, 1999 Page 11--2 redevelopment site, and associated redevelopment plan and project objectives. Through close collaboration with City and RedevelOpment Agency staff, the redevelopment project description will identify the objectives and characteristics of the redevelopment project, and the range and extent of redevelopment actions likely to be implemented through the redevelopment plan. Specifically, the project description will include the following: ·the project's regional and local setting; · precise location and boundaries of the project;' · the basic project objectives; · the various jurisdictional entitlements and approvals requested from the City/Agency to implement the project; · the mall renewal plan physical characteristics and design particulars, with text, data, and graphics depicting the overall land use and circulation design (site plan), site access and internal circulation provisions, floor plans, architectural elevations, parking displacement and replacement plans; pedestrian, bicycle, transit provisions; signage features, exterior lighting features, street landscape features, building height and lot coverage information, grading aspects, etc.; · the anticipated construction schedule; · project operation and maintenance provisions (site and building ownership, proposed hours of operation, anticipated cinema operational characteristics and peak patronage, times and numbers, etc.); and · required jurisdictional approvals and permits necessary to permit construction 'and operation of the project. Note: Four (4) full size. sets of project plans and one (1) reproducible 1 1" x 17" reduction will be requested by the Wagstaff and Associates for team use in preparation of the EIR. It is .also assumed for purposes of this proposal that the project application submitted to the City/ Agency by the applicant will be accurate and complete, and that no substantive changes to the project description will be proposed during the course of EIR preparation. F. Clarification of Kev Issues and Concerns Wagstaff and Associates will clarify the environmental issues and concerns associated with the proposed project, based on City/Agency staff contacts, data review, field survey, and telephone contacts as necessary. G. Coml31etion of Initial Studv Checklist and NOP Based on the information gathered, Wagstaff and Associates will complete an Initial Study Checklist and accompanying narrative to 'determine more precisely the appropriate scope of the EIR, using the current format recommended by the State Resources Agency, or if desired WP51 t596tMISCIPRO-2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit"A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11--3 by the City, the City's own Initial Study checklist format. Wagstaff and Associates will also prepare the accompanying Notice of Preparation. The City/Agency will be responsible for reproducing and circulating the NOP and Initial Study. TASK I!. DESCRIPTION OF SETTING, POTENTIAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATIONS Existing onsite and offsite conditions relevant to the environmental implications of the redevelopment project will be described in written and graphic form. Potential project impacts and associated mitigation needs will then be identified. Emphasis will be placed on key issues and concerns identified in Task I. Suggested impact categories and related subtasks are discussed below. (The team member with principal responsibility is identified next to each subtasks heading.) In preparing these analyses, the consultant team will seek to avoid duplication of effort by making maximum possible use of existing environmental documents and other relevant studi~s available at or through the City (including any technical studies by the applicant). A. Land Use and Plannin_(:l (Wagstaff and. Associates) The primary land use issues raised by the mall renewal proposal are expected to include compatibility of the project (especially the multi-screen cinema) with existing and planned adjacent and sbrrounding uses in the downtown area, and project consistency with Cuoertino General Plan goals and policies for the downtown. The following subtasks will be completed to addi'ess these land use and planning concerns: 1. Settina. The existing land use pattern in the project's downtown vicinity will be concisely described in narrative, map, and aerial photograph form. General Plan policies related to the project site will be reviewed and reiterated. 2. Potential Impacts. The potential land use impacts of the project will then be evaluated and described, including: · Land use and other planning implications of the redevelopment plan, development agreement amendment, use permit amendment and any other planning approvals necessary to accommodate the project; · Compatibility with adjacent existing and planned retail, service, office, and residential uses; and · Internal compatibility of the general shopping center modifications layout. 3. Miti,qation. Measures will be recommended as warranted to mitigate any identified . potentially significant adverse land use impacts. WP5115961MISClPRO-2. EXA r Wagsta~f and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" · City 0f Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11--4 El. Visual Factors (Wagstaff and Associates)' Wagstaff and Associates will use the architectural and landscape drawings and any other project description materials submitted by the applicant to evaluate the visual implications of the project. Wagstaff and Associates Will apply its particular strengths in visual impact analysis and urban design to address these impacts. Primary visual issues raised by the proposed mall changes may include the marquee and other cinema design aspects, and the proposed height and bulk of the new department store, cinema and parking structures in relationship to the surrounding existing downtown environment. 1. Settin(3. The existing visual character of the mall edges and surrounding downtown area will be described with concise narrative, photographs, and illustrative map diagram. The description will address any pertinent visual factors that have been identified as important in the City's Cupertino General Plan, and will include: · Site relationships to the overall downtown layout; · ~;ite relationships to existing commercial frontages (storefronts) along and on the opposite sides of Vallco Parkway and Wolfe Road; and · Important viewpoints of the project site fi'om surrounding streets. 2. Potential Impacts. The potential impacts of the redevelopment project on the visual character of the area will then be evaluated. Adopted Cupertino General Plan policies relevant to the downtown area and any adopted City design guidelines pertinent to the project and its. building height and bulk, architecture, signage, exterior lighting, and landscape provisions will be considered in determining the significance of project visual impacts. 3. Mitigation. If necessary, project modifications and refinements will be recommended as conditions of negative declaration to reduce any identified significant adverse visual impacts. C. Traffic, Circulation, and Parkin¢l (Fehr & Peers Associates) Fehr & Peers Associates, consulting transportation engineers, as subcontractor to Wagstaff and Associates, under supervision of City Public Works Department staff, will complete a traffic and parking study for the project. The study will evaluate project impacts on average daily traffic and peak hour volumes along affected city and region-serving streets and highways, as well as vehicular access and internal project circulation adequacy; impacts on public transit, and cumulative circulation and parking impacts. The study will be subject to review and approval by the City's traffic engineer. The study scope is described in the attached August 30, 1999 Proposal--Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Proiect EIR-- Supplemental Traffic and Parkinc~ Analysis, by Fehr & Peers. WP5 ~ 1596tMISCIPRO-2. EXA r Wagstah' and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11--5 r Following review and acceptance of the study by City staff, Wagstaff and Associates will incorporate appropriate findings into the EIR. Using the traffic and parking analysis and current City policies as a basis, the EIR will focus on: (1) the need for offsite transportation mitigations; (2) any need for changes to onsite circulation, access, and parking provisions; and (3) the adequacy (convenience) of the proposed parking program. D. Air Quality (Donald Ba//anti, Air Quality Consultant) The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has established stringent thresholds of significance for regional air quality impacts. The BAAQMD considers projects that generate mom than 80 pounds per day of ozone precursors or PM-10 (combining stationary and mobile sources) to be significant. The air quality analysis for the Vallco .Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR will use these significance thresholds to determine the significance of the project's air quality impacts. Donald Ballanti will complete the following tasks to provide these findings: 1. Setting. · A description of the climate, meteorology, and historical air quality data for the project area, and of current efforts to attain and maintain the state and federal air quality standards, will be prepared. · Any existing sources of air pollution in the study area, including mobile sources, stationary sources and sources of toxic air pollutants, will be documented. 2. Potential Impacts.. · Any potential for nuisance impacts during the construction period both within the project site and for any neighboring properties will be identified. · Microscale modeling of local carbon monoxide levels near major intersections that would be affected by project-generated traffic will be performed, using the CALINE-4 computer model. · URBEMIS-5 modeling for project regional air quality impacts will 'be conducted. · The significance of project construction, local and regional impacts will then be determined, using the thresholds of significance recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 3. Mitic~ation. · Construction-phase controls and practices warranted to reduce dust impacts associated with construction will be identified. · Air quality mitigation measures or programs already included within the project operation and design will be identified. WP5115961MISCIPRO-2. EX,4 r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR .September 3, 1999 Page 11-6 · If required, additional mitigation measures for any identified significant air quality impacts, and evaluate the effectiveness of these measures will be developed. E. Noise (lllingworth & Rodkin, /nc.) Illingworth & Rodkin will describe the noise implications of the proposed mall renewal project, including the effects of associated traffic increases on ambient and cumulative future noise levels in the project area and along principal local travel routes. Implementation of the redevelopment plan could affect the local noise environment in two ways: (1) by increasing vehicular traffic, and (2) by generating short-term construction noise. The following tasks will be completed to address these issues. 1. Settin(~. The principal noise sources currently affecting the mall vicinity include vehicular traffic on the 1-280 freeway and the local street network, and aircraft overflights. The noise environment in the downtown area will be defined by Illingworth & Rodkin. A noise measurement will be conducted in order to quantify existing noise levels at the site. The setting discussion will also describe pertinent 'noise/land use compatibility standards set forth in the City of Cu0ertino General Plan Noise Element. 2. Impacts. The likely effects of the anticipated project-related traffic changes on the local noise environment will then be identified. The project-related traffic changes identified by Fehr & Peers will provide the primary basis for the noise impact assessment. General conclusions will be documented with respect to potential cumulative adverse noise effects of the project and their significance. Emphasis will be placed on potential creation or intensification of noise-related land use conflicts. Short-term noise impact potentials associated with the proposed project demolition and new construction activities will also be generally described. 3. Miti(3ation Measures. Measures warranted to mitigate any identified significant adverse noise impacts will be recommended. F.' Public Services (Wagstaff and Associates) The EIR will include an evaluation of project impacts on police, fire protection and emergency medical services needs. Project sewer, water, school, and parks and recreation impacts are expected to be less-than-significant. (This assumption will be confirmed through the Initial Study process described in Task I.G above.) · -' 1. Fire Protection/Ememencv Medical Services. Wagstaff and Associates will descdbe existing fire protection, paramedic and ambulance service in the city and project vicinity based on consultation with the Cupertino Fire Department. pOtential project demands on future fire protection, paramedic and ambulance service will be evaluated. The proposed mall WP5115961MISCIPRO-2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit"A" City o1' Cupertino . Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11--7 modifications site plan will be analyzed for fire and emergency vehicle access. Any possible special training or equipment needs associated with the multi-screen cinema or parking garage components will be identified in consultation with the Fire Department. Associated mitigation measures or site plan changes will then be recommended. 2. Police. Wagstaff and Associates will describe existing police station locations, beats, response times, officer-to-population ratios, and adequacy of existing facilities and equipment, based on consultation with the Cupertino Police Department. Potential project impacts related to increase demands for police service, including possible additional patrolling, personnel or facilities needs associated with the cinema and other new uses, will then be identified, and mitigation measures recommended. G. Soils and Geoloclv (Optional; Wagstaff and Associates) If a potential for a greater than normal geotechnical impact is identified in the Initial Study process (Task I.G), the City/Agency may authorize that the EIR scope be amended to include a Soils and Geology section. If this work scope option is selected, the following subtasks will be completed to concisely address the geologic conditions of the project site and the degree of hazard potential associated with the proposed mall changes and proposed occupancy. 1. Settin(3. Existing conditions pertaining to surface faulting, groundshaking, groundwater, and other potential development constraints would be summarized. The analysis would be based on existing data, including any geotechnical investigations available from the applicant. 2. Potential Iml3acts. The information described above would be considered in evaluating any site potentials for long-term instability and to gauge the hazards to the project associated with earthquake-induced groundshaking, and any other geotechnical factors. 3. Mitic~ation. It is expected that the construction on the project site in conformance with the Uniform Building Code would provide a sufficient level of structural integrity to resist catastrophic failure, so mitigations would likely focus on any need for special foundation or remediation techniques that may have been recommended in available ge.otechnical reports. r H. Public Health ahd Safety (was described.as optional in the original, June 8, 1999 r proposal; now included in work scope; Wagstaff and Associates) If the Initial Study identifies concerns regarding possible hazardous' building mate~;ials in the existing structures to be modified or demolished, or possible soil or groundwater contamination in the areas to be excavated, the City/Agency may elect to amend the EIR scope to address these EIR concerns, as follows: 1. Settin(3. The potential for presence of hazardous materials within the proposed demolition and construction (excavation) areas that could pose a significant health and safety risk would be described, based on existing available information. (The description would be WP511$961MISCtPRO-2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A- City 0I Cupertino . va~lco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11-8 based on a computer-assisted interagency records search commissioned by Wagstaff and Associates.) No onsite sampling would be conducted. 2. Impacts. The proposed modifications to existing structures would be evaluated to determine the potential for contact by construction period personnel with any existing hazardous materials during demolition (friable asbestos, lead paint, etc.), or contaminated soils or groundwater during excavation of the construction sites, based on available data. 3. Miti(3ation Measures. Any mitigation measures warranted to reduce or eliminate identified significant hazardous materials exposure impacts, including anticipated investigation and remediation protocols, would be identified. r I. Cultural and Historic Resources (was described as "optional" in original, June 8, 1999 r proposal; now included in work scope; Wagstaff and Associates) Similar to Task G and H above, the Initial Study may identify a concern regarding project impacts on or relationships to an underlying or adjacent cultural or historic resource (historic building or neighborhood, etc.). If so, the City/Agency may elect the amend to EIR scope to address such concerns, as follows: 1. Settin(~. Wagstaff and Associates would describe the existing setting and the likelihood that underlying cultural artifacts may b~ found during project-related excavation activities, or an adjacent historic resource may be affected by the project, and would describe the City's policies regarding such resources. 2. Potential Impacts. Potential for project disturbance of any potential subsurface archaeological values or adjacent historic values would be evaluated and documented based on existing available information, and the relative .impact significance described. 3. Mitiaation. Measures warranted to mitigate any identified archaeological or historic resource impact potentials would be recommended. TASK III. RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS Wagstaff and Associates will discuss the compliance of the proposed project and its anticipated impacts with relevant policies of the City of Cupertino General Plan and any other pertinent City-adopted downtown policies and/or development guidelines. As required by CEQA, project.consistency with relevant adopted reaional plans (Santa Clam County Congestion Management Program, Bay Area Air Quality Management District Bay Area '97 Clean Air Plan, Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Control Plan, etc.) will also be concisely discussed. WP~ ! ~5~6~MISC~PFIO-2. EXA r Wagsta['f and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11--9 TASK IV. CEQA-REQUIRED ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS A. Growth-lnducin(3 Effects Aspects of the project that' would be growth-inducing will be described. B. Unavoidable Adverse Effects Significant environmental effects identified in the EIR that could not be avoided if the project were implemented will be identified. (Unavoidable adverse impacts are those that could not be reduced to less than significant levels by the mitigation measures recommended in the E~R.) C. Irreversible Environmental Chancles Unavoidable adverse environmental changes due to the project that would be pe~;manent will also be identified. D. Cumulative Iml3acts A reference to identified significant cumulative impacts of the project described within the various topical sections of the EIR will be provided. E. Effects Found not to be Siclnificant Based on the Initial Study (Task I G), a brief statement will be provided explaining why various possible environmental effects were determined not to be significant and are therefore not discussed in detail in the EIR. TASK V. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT The alternatives chapter of the EIR will include an analysis of the "no project" alternative as required by CEQA, plus three or four additional project alternatives. Identification of the alternatives to be evaluated will be finalized in consultation with City/Agency staff. The alternatives will be developed to meet most of the basic goals of the project and to eliminate or reduce any identified significant environmental impacts. The alternatives could include mitigating modifications to the proposed project site layout and/or mitigating variations on the proposed new uses (e.g., a smaller cinema with increased retail and other entertainment space; or a larger cinema with reduced retail and other space). A comparative evaluation of the alternatives will be provided that includes a qualitative, order- of-magnitude comparison of key impacts such as land use and visual compatibility, traffic impacts~ public service implications, air quality impacts, noise effects, etc. WP51t596tMISC~PRO-2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11-10 As stipulated in the CEQA Guidelines, the "environmentally superior alternative" will also be identified. If the "no project" alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, the environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives will be identified. TASK VI. PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR The Draft EIR will be organized with existing condition, impact, and mitigation findings grouped by major topic (land use; visual factors; population and housing; transportation; public services; air quality; noise; etc.). The EIR will be concise and will be written for clear and easy understanding by City decision-makers and the general public. Appendices will be limited. A. Administrative Draft EIR Project description, existing setting, impact assessment, and mitigation measures developed in Tasks I and II will be refined and presented in an Administrative Draft EIR (ADEIR). The ADEIR will identify whether each impact is less-than-significant or significant. The ADEIR will also cleady identify whether an impact would.be reduced to a less-than-significant level with mitigation, or whether it would represent an unavoidable significant impact. These statements wil! be listed in a distinctive format so that they are easily identifiable. (For example, statements of significance will be coded and italicized.) Ten (10) copies of the Administrative Draft will be submitted to City/Agency staff for internal review, and comment. B. Screen Draft EIR Wagstaff and Associates expects that one consolidated set of comments will be submitted by City/Agency staff regarding changes needed to the Administrative Draft EIR. A Screen Draft EIR will then be prepared, incorporating as n~cessary, revisions and refinements to the Administrative Draft based on City/Agency staff comments. Two (2) copies of the Screen Draft will be delivered to City/Agency for approval before releasing the Draft EIR for public review. C. Draft EIR A public-release Draft EIR will then be released, incorporating any final refinements requested by City/Agency staff. Fifty (50) copies of the Draft EIR will be prepared and submitted to the City/Agency. The City/Agency will be responsible for distributing and circulating the Draft EIR pursuant to CEQA and Cupertino environmental review procedures. WP5 f t5961MISCI PRO-2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Sul3contract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page II--11 TASK VII. PREPARATION OF THE FINAL EIR A. Administrative Draft Final EIR Addendum An Administrative Draft Final EIR Addendum will be prepared to incorporate revisions to the DEIR text deemed necessary in response to public, review period comments, as well as the written responses of the EIR authors to substantive review period comments on the Draft EIR received from the public, the Planning Commission, and other responsible or interested parties. The FEIR will also include a list of persons and agencies that commented on the DEIR, an index to and summary of comments received, and a collection of verbatim comments (letters, memoranda, minutes, etc.). Five (5) copies of the Administrative Draft FEIR Addendum (with the document content limited to the responses to comments and associated DEIR text revisions only) will be submitted for City/Agency staff review and comment. Final EIR Addendum A Final EIR Addendum will be prepared, incoi'porating as necessary revisions and refinements to the Administrative Draft FEIR Addendum based upon City/Agency staff responses. Fifty (50) copies of the Final EIR will be submitted to the City/Agency for distribution. TASK VIII. PREPARATION OF MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM For a' project of this nature, most of the environmental mitigation measures likely to be · recommended in the EIR will be subject to effective monitoring through the normal City project approval and implementation process. However, to satisfy CEQA section 21081.6, a documented record of implementation will be necessary. A monitoring approach and checklist will be prepared by Wagstaff and Associates for use by City/Agency staff to ensurethat those mitigation measures that are ultimately required as plan changes or conditions of plan approval are implemented. TASK IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS John Wagstaff, Principal-in-Charge, will attend up to two (2) public meetings (Planning Commission and/or City Council) to present the EIR findings and answer questions regarding the environmental review process and content. John Wagstaff or Don Dean, Senior Planner and Project Manager, will also be available to attend up to two (2) additional work sessions with City staff during the preparation of the EIR and mitigation monitoring program. Attendance by Wagstaff and Associates staff at additional meetings, or meeting attendance by any of the EIR subconsultants, could be provided for an additional fee. WI~51L~96iMISCtPFIO'2. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A" ' City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 11--12 wP$115961MISCIPRO.2. F_..XA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit City of Cupertino , Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page III--1 III. PROPOSED EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS To meet the environmental documentation requirements described in sections I and II, the following Table of Contents for the Vallco Fashion Park Re'development Plan EIR is proposed. This preliminary table represents the EIR organization and content currently envisioned by Wagstaff and Associates. The EIR format would be finalized in consultation with City and Agency staff at the outset of the work program. I. INTRODUCTION A. EIR Purpose and Intended Use B. EIR Approach--"Program EIR" C. EIR Scope--Significant Issues and Concerns D. :Significant Impacts" and Other Key EIR Terminology E. Report Organization and Content F. Fiscal Impacts (reference to other reports). . I1. SUMMARY A. Proposed Project B. Environmental Issues C. Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures D. Summary of Project Relationships to Adopted Plans E. Summary of Alternatives F. Mitigation Implementation III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A, Project Location B. Project Background C. Basic Project Objectives D. Anticipated Overall Range of Redevelopment Plan Actions E. Project Scheduling and Environmental Assessment Time Frame F. Required Project Documentation and Approvals IV. SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATIONS A. Land Use and Planning B. Visual Factors C. Population and Housing D. Transportation and Parking WP5 f tS~6IMISClPRO-3. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates 5u0contract Exhibit "A' City 0! Cupertino , Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 111--2 E. Public Services 1. Police 2. Fire Protection 3. Emergency Medical Services 4. Parks F. Air Quality G. Noise H. Public Health and Safety I. Cultural and Historic Resources V. RELATIONSHIP TO ADOPTED PLANS' AND POLICIES A. City of Cupertino General Plan B. Pertinent Regional Plans VI. CEQA-REQUIRED ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS A. Growth-Inducing Impacts B. Unavoidable Significant AdverSe Impacts C. Irreversible Environmental Changes D. Cumulative Impacts E. · Effects Found Not to Be Significant VII. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. No Project B. Modified Project Layout C. Modified Redevelopment Actions D. Modified Redevelopment Boundaries E. Alternative Sites F. Conclusions: Environmentally Superior Alternative VIII. MITIGATION MONITORING A. Monitoring Requirements B. Monitoring Checklist IX. ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONTACTED A. City of Cupertino B. Cupertino Redevelopment Agency C. Others .... X. REFERENCES &.3/ WPS t t5961MISGtPR(:% 3. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 111--3 Xl. APPENDICES A. Program EIR Authority B. Notice of Preparation and Initial Study C. Supplemental Land Use, Housing, and Population Information D. Supplemental Transportation Information E. Supplemental Air Quality Data F.. CEQA Standards for EIR Adequacy G. CEQA Definition of "Mitigation" H. EIR Consultant Team WP51t596tMISCtPRO"3. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertitlo Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page 111--4 WP$1 t~96~MI$CtF~RO-3. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page IV-1 IV. PRODUCTS AND WORK SCHEDULE Wagstaff and Associates will submit the Administrative Draft EIR within approximately nine weeks (45 working days) of contract execution. This schedule assumes City/Agency acceptance of complete project description information and all needed background material from the applicant prior to commencing work. The schedule also assumes receipt of a City staff-approved version of the applicant-commissioned traffic and parking study (by Fehr & Peers) within two weeks of contract execution. Alternatively (whichever occurs later), the Administrative Draft EIR will be delivered within approximately two weeks (10 days) of receipt of the City staff-approved traffic and parking study. Product/Milestone Copies Delivery Schedule A. Contract Execution -- Week 1 B. Administrative Draft EIR Ten (1'0) copies Week 9 (45 working days from start date, or 10 days following City staff approval of applicant's ·traffic and parking study) C. City/Agency Staff Comments on One (1) copy Week 11 (2 weeks/10 working days from ADEIR receipt of ADEIR) D. Screen Draft EIR Two (2) copies Week 12 (one weal</5 working days from receipt of City/Agency staff comments on ADEIR) E. Draft EIR Fifty (50) Week 14 (2 weeks/10 working days from copies receipt of City/Agency staff comments on SDEIR) F. 45-day Public Review Period Ends -- Week 21 (45 days after release'of Draft EIR) G. Administrative Draft Final EIR/ Five (5) copies Week 23 (2 weeks/10 working days after Mitigation Monitoring Plan receipt from City/Agency staff of .all public review pedod comments) H. City/Agency Staff Comments on One (1) copy Week 24 (1 week/5 working days from ADFEIR receipt of ADFEIR) I. Final EIR Attachment Fifty (50) Week 25 (1 weekJ5 working days from copies receipt of City/Agency comments on ADFEIR) These delivery times are preliminary. Given our current and projected workl(~ad, we foresee no problem with completing the EIR within this timeframe. The Wagstaff and Associates team remains flexible with respect to changes in this schedule to meet City/Agency and redevelopment consultant team needs. WP51i596tMISCiPFIO-4.EXA Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A' City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page IV-2 r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City of Cupertino , Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page V-1 V. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND KEY PERSONNEL Wagstaff and Associates will have overall responsibility for all EIR preparation. Principal-in- Charge will be John Wac~staff. Mr. Wagstaff will have overall responsibility for EIR team management, staff liaison, and the preparation and editing of all work products; he will be editor of all environmental documents, and will attend up to two (2) public meetings and up to two staff/redevelopment team meetings. Mr. Wagstaff is a graduate architect with a master's degree in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Or?gon and over 28 years of experience in urban planning, urban design, and environmental impact assessment. Mr. Wagstaff was Principal-in-Charge of the 1999 Town Center Mall Redevelopment Project EIR for the City of Sunnyvale (included a 16-screen cinema); the 1999 Great Mall Modifications SEIR for the City of Milpitas (included a 20-screen cinema); the 1999 Sierra Vista Shoppinc~ Center Modifications EIR for'the City of Clovis (included a 16-screen cinema), the 1998 Downtown Hayward Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR for the Hayward Redevelopment Agency, the 1998 Citrus Heights Redevelopment Plan EIR for the City of Citrus Heights, the 1998 Buckeye Redevelopment Plan EIR for the Redding Redevelopment Agency, 1997 Folsom Redevelopment Plan EIR for the City of Folsom Redevelopment Agency, the 1997 Hiclhwa¥ 101 Redevelopment Plan EIR for the Redwood City Redevelopment Agency, the 1996 Hi(3hwa¥ 29 Corridor Redevelo[~ment Plan EIR for the American Canyon Redevelopment Agency, the 1996 Arvin Community Redevelopment Plan EIR for Kern County, the 1995 Sonoma General Plan Update EIR for the City of Sohoma, the 1994 Hollister Community Development Plan EIR for the Hollister Redevelopment Agency, the 1994 El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Plan EIR for the'City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency., and the 1994 El Cerrito Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR for the City of El Cerrito. He has also been Project Manager on a number of other similar program EIRs for redeveloPment programs, general plan updates, and specific plans. Donald Dean, Senior Planner with Wagstaff and Associates, will be EIR Project Manager for Wagstaff and Associates with responsibility for day-to-day project administration, subcontractor administration, staff liaison, completion of necessary research and analysis update tasks, field surveys, and product preparation. Don Dean holds a Bachelor of Arts degree Magna Cum Laude from the State University of New York (SUNY), a Master of City Planning (MCP) degree from the University of California at Berkeley, and has over 14 years of professional experience as a planning and environmental consultant. He has had project management and/or other major responsibilities in preparation of numerous similar environmental impact and urban planning projects, including the current Russian River Corridor Redevelopment Plan EIR. for the Sonoma County Community Development Commission, 1998 Fremont Redevelopment Plan Amendment and Mercier E'IR for the Fremont Redevelopment Agency, the 1998 Citrus Hek3hts Redevelopment Plan EIR for the Citrus Hts. Redevelopment Agency, the 1998 Buckeye Redevelopment Plan EIR for the Redding Redevelopment Agency, the WP511596tMISCt PFI(~ 5. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "A" City o1' Cupertino , Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page V-2 1995 Oaklev Old Town Specific Plan and Redevelopment Plan EIR for the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, and the 1993 Alameda Redevelooment Plan EIR for the City of Alameda Redevelopment Agency. Natalie Macris, Senior Planner with Wagstaff and Associates, will assist with various research, analysis, and editing tasks. Ms. Macris holds a Bachelor of Arts and Master of City Planning degrees from the University of California, Berkeley, and has nine years of professional planning experience, including seven as a planning Consultant. Most recently, Ms. Macris has been Wagstaff and Associates' Project Manager for completion of the 1999 Sierra Vista Rec~ional Shoppincl Center Modifications EIR for the City of Clovis, the 1998 Downtown Hayward Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR for the Hayward Redevelopment Agency, the 1998 Cowell Ranch Project EIR for Contra Costa County (a 5,300-unit new community near Brentwood), and the 1998 Southeast Annexation EIR for a 2,700-acre addition to the city of Pittsburg. r Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc., transportation consultants,, will conduct the transportation impact analysis which will be incorporated into the EIR. Jane Bierstedt, P.E., Principal, is managing the transportation impact analysis for the applicant, under the supervision of City staff. Ms. Bierstedt holds a Master of Science in Engineering (Transportation) from U.C. -- Berkeley and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from Drexel University. She has 16 years of experience in transportation 'planning, including traffic impact analyses, parking studies, traffic engineering projects, neighborhood traffic studies, transit studies, and congestion management programs. Representative projects have included the Downtown Sunnyvale Parking Analysis, the Monterey Corridor Redevelopment Plan, operational analyses for state Route 85 in Santa Clara County, and the Capital Corridor Project Definition Study and Downtown Evergreen Corridor Alternatives Planning Study for the Santa Clara County Transportation Agency. Iliingworth & Rodkin; Inc., acoustical engineers, will be responsible for the.noise impact and .mitigation aspects of the program EIR. The firm has prepared similar analyses for numerous other Bay Region EIRs, including six recent redevelopment plan EIRs and four recent multi- screen cinema EIRs for Wagstaff and Associates. The Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment · Plan EIR work will be supervised by Richard Rodkin, P.E., principal of the firm with over 20 years of acoustical consulting experience. Mr..lllingworth will be assisted on the noise analysis by James Reyff, Project Scientist. Mr. Reyff has effectively performed a similar role on seven recent Wagstaff and Associates EIRs. Donald Ballanti, certified consulting meteorologist, will be responsible for the air quality analysis of the EIR. Mr. Ballanti has more than 18 years of experience as a'consultant in the areas of air pollution meteorology, air pollution impact analysis, air quality planning, and ._. meteorological and climatic analysis. Mr. Ballanti also completed the air quality analysis for numerous Bay Area EIRs, including nine recent Wagstaff and Associates redevelopment plan EIRs.. ~ '37 WP51 t5961MISCtPRO-5. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A" City of Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page VI-1 r VI. REVISED FEE ESTIMATE 1. Estimated Contract Fee The approximate contract fee for professional labor and miscellaneous costs described herein through preparation and submittal of the Draft EIR and Final EIR Addendum would total r $76,020. Cost breakdowns, including current labor rates, are itemized in Exhibit 2. The The contract fee total includes attendance at the specified meetings (see Task IX) and the pdntin, g and delivery to the.Agency of ten (10) copies of the Administrative Draft EIR, two (2) copies of the Screen Draft EIR, fifty (50) copies of the Draft EIR, ten (10) copies of the Administrative Final EIR Addendum, fifty (50) copies of the Final EIR Addendum, and related PC computer disks for all products. r The estimate is based on the assumption that no more than $10,354 of the total fee for primary and subcontractors will be allocated to preparation and delivery, of the Final EIR Addendum. Any additional services requested of the EIR consultants by the City or Agency for labor (revisions, meetings, testimony, etc.), reproduction (additional copies) or other items beyond the scope of work described herein and itemized below would' be billed to the Agency on a time-and-materials basis at our standard rates. 2. Comoensation Payments to Wagstaff and Associates for services rendered in accordance with the scope of services and schedule described herein will be based upon submission of monthly statements.' These statements will itemize monthly totals and running totals. The following payment schedule is proposed: A. 15 percent of the total project fee upon contract execution; B. Monthly payments not exceeding 75 percent of the total fee prior to completion of the Administrative Draft EIR; WP51 [5961MISCIPRO-6. EXA r Wagstaff and Associates Subcontract Exhibit "/~" City of Cupertiflo Vallco Fashien Park Redevelopment Plan EIR ,C~eptember 3, t999 Page VI-2 C. Monthly payments not exceeding 80 percent of the total fee prior to completion of the Draft EIR; D. Monthly payments not exceeding 90 percent of the total fee pdor to completion and delivery of the Final EIR.Addendum; and E. Monthly payments not exceeding 100 percent of the total fee prior to certification of the Final EIR, or 75 days after submittal of the Final EIR Addendum, whichever occurs first. WPS f ~Sg61MISCIPRO-6.EXA r Wagsta~f and Associates Subcontract Exhibit 'A- City ot' Cupertino Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3, 1999 Page VI-? r Exhibit 2 r REVISED COST ESTIMATE FOR PROGRAM EIR Labor Hours Labor Costs Personnel Adm I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Ttl S/hr Ttl$ Wagstaff & Assoc, J. Wagstaff 10 14 23 2 2 4 20 13 I 16 105 138 14,490 D. Dean 20 31 43 10 6 12 48 44 6 6 226 110 24,860 N. Macris .... 10 .............. 10 110 1,100 Draftsperson -- 4 3 1 .... 2 ...... 10 55 550 r Original Total (June 8, 1999) ~1,0'00 r Added Tasks: r Public Health and Safety Section 950 r Cultural and Historic Resources Section 950 r New Total 42,900 Subcontractors r Fehr & Peers, Transportation $21,070 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., Noise .4,200 Donald Ballanti, Air Quality 3,740 r Subcontractor subtotal 29,010 TOTAL LABOR WITHOUT OPTIONS $71,910 Rel~ort Production and Delivery Administrative Draft EIR (13 copies, 10 to City) 364 Screen Draft EIR (4 copies, 2 to City) 112 Draft EiR (65 copies, 50 to City) 1,820 Administrative Final EIR (13 copies, 10 to City) 234 Final EIR (60 copies, 50 to City) 1,080_ Subtotal 3,610 Miscellaneous Costs Map and photo reproduction 250 Other miscellaneous 250. Subtotal 500 Total Reproduction, Delivery and Miscellaneous 4,110 TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE--REVISED $76,020 Optional Tasks: Soils and Geology Section $950 WI~51iSg61MISClPRO-6. EXA r Wagstaff ancl Associates Subcontract Exhibit City of Cupertino Vellco Fashion Perk Redevelopment Plan EIR September 3. 1999 Page VI-4 WP51 t5961MISCIPRO-6. EXA FEHR& PEERS ASSOCIATES, [NC. Transportation Consult, mrs I [53 Lincoln Avenue, Suite [ San Jose, CA 95125 408 278-1700 - Fax 408 278-/7[7 [ehrandpeers.com August 30, 1999 Mr. John Wagstaff Wagstaff and A~sociates 2512 Ninth Street, Suite 5 Berkeley, California 94710 Subject: Proposal- ~Tallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Project £IR -'Supplemental Traffic and Parking Analyses Dear Mr. Wagstaff: Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to conduct supplementary traffic and parking analyses for the Vallco Fashion Park Redevelopment Project EIR. The Scope and Fee Estimate are based on information contained in your memorandum dated August 11, 1999, with a slight modification to Scenario 2. The supplementary analyses will include evaluating three new traffic scenarios; evaluating parking impacts, and providing a more detailed analysis of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit impacts. The Scope of Work (Attachment A) outlines the tasks that we will undertake. We estimate that the total cost to complete the tasks outlined in Attachment A is approximately $21,070. A breakdown of the cost by task is presented in Attachment B. Additional services will be conducted with authorization and billed on time-and-materials basis according to our current rate schedule (Attachment C). Invoices for completed work will be submitted monthly and are due and payable upon receipt. We estimate that we can submit a report for inclusion in the administrative draft EIR within four weeks of our receipt of written authorization to proceed and confirmation of the project description and the existing entitlements. I::;EHR&PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. Tt'ansport~ltion Consultants Mr. John Wagstaff August 30, 1999 Page 2 Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call us. Otherwise, our receipt of a signed copy of this letter, showing your acceptance of its terms, will authorize us to proceed with the study. We are looking forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEP_TEDj;~: ~'o~ Principal Susan M. DeBorde Company~'~li~";~ /lJ. rl,~',l Senior Transportation Engineer Signature t ~-~ ~ ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK Vail'co Fashion Pa'rk Redevelopment Project EIR Supplemental Traffic and Parking Analyses The purpose of the transportation section of the EIR is to evaluate the relative impacts of the proposed expansion of Vallco Fashion Park vis a vis existing development entitlements. The impacts will be evaluated wifl'l level of service calculations for key intersections and arterials in the vicinity of the site. The following lists of intersections and arterials will be evaluated: Key Intersections 1. Miller Avenue and Bollinger Road 2. Miller Avenue and Phil Lane 3. Miller Avenue and Calle De Barcelona 4. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road 5. Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway 6. Wolfe Road and 1-280 Northbound Ramps 7. Wolfe Road and 1-280 Southbound Ramps 8. Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Avenue 9. Wolfe Road and Homestead Road '10. Vallco Parkway and Perimeter Road 11. Vallco Parkway and Finch Avenue 12. Vallco Parkway and Tantau Avenue 13. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Tantau Avenue 14. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Finch Avenue 15. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Perimeter Road 16. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Portal Avenue 17. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Blaney Avenue 18. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Tone Avenue 19. · Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard Key Arterials Wolfe'Road - Homestead Road to Bollinger Road Stevens Creek Boulevard - De Anza Boulevard to Tantau Avenue The analysis time periods are: Weekday Midday peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekend Peak Hour The weekday AM peak-hour time period will not be evaluated in detail since cinemas and regional shopping centers generate little to no traffic before 9:00 am on weekdays. Projected AM peak-hour traffic for the redevelopment project will be estimated and presented in the report. The key intersections will be evaluated for the following scenarios: Scenario 1: Existing Conditions - Existing volumes obtained fi:om counts. (This analysis has been completed but is being updated with new counts.) Scenario 2: Existing plus Approved (Base Case) Conditions - Existing volumes plus traffic fi:om approved, but not yet constructed developments in the area, _. including traffic associated with the currently built but vacant retail space in Vallco Fashion Park. Scenario 3: Existing plus Approved Conditions plus Proposed Project - Existing volumes plus traffic from approved, but not yet constructed developments in the area, plus the net difference in traffic between the project (both phases combined) and Scenario 2. Scenario 4: Cumulative Conditions -'Traffic from Scenario 4 plus traffic fi:om additional development included in the city's current General Plan. Other issues to be addressed include: 1. Adequacy of the parking program 2. On-site vehicular circulation and access impacts 3. Project impacts on pedestrian and bicycle access 4. Project impacts on public transit The analysis will be conducted with the following tasks: Task 1: Estimate Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, and Trip Assignment -- Traffic generated by the existing entitlements, the proposed entitlements, and the net difference (the project) will be estimated using information from the Institute Of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (5* and 6'~' Editions) aiad Caltrans trip generation reports. The trip generation estimates for the various analysis time periods will be submitted to City staff for review. The directions of approach and departure estimated for the preliminary analysis will be used for this analysis. The trips will be assigned to the roadway segments and intersection turning movements based on the' directions of approach and departure. Existing and proposed entitlem,nt trips will be assigned to site driveways based on the distribution of on-site parking and the traffic circulation patterns in the study area. TRAFFIX sofhvare will be used to assign project trips to the roadway network. Task 2 - Update Existing Conditions The results of recently completed counts will be used to update the levels of service for five of the key intersections close to the site, during the PM peak hour. The intersection and arterial levels of service will be calculated using the TRAFFIX software package. Task 3 - Evaluate Scenario 2 The list of approved, but not yet constructed, developments will be verified with City of Cupertino staff. Available traffic projections for approved developments added to the list in the preliminary analysis will be obtained fi:om staff. For those developments without formal traffic studies, we will estimate the traffic added to the roadway network using standard traffic engineering methods. Traffic for the approved developm&nts will be added to the existing volumes. The intersection and arterial levels of service will be calculated. Approved roadway improvements that are programmed to be completed prior to the proposed development will be assumed to be in place in the background level of service analysis. Task 4 - Evaluate Project Conditions (Scenario 3) Net-added project trips (estimated in Task 1) will be added to traffic volumes for Scenario 2 to obtain traffic volumes for Project Conditions. The operations of the roadway system under Project Conditions will be evaluated using intersection and arterial level of service calculations. The left-mm pocket storage lengths evaluated in the preliminary analysis will be re-evaluated with the revised projections. ATTACHMENT C ::. '-. FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC. [:... Hourly Billing Rates Classification S~nior.4~sociate $120.00 - $140.00 [' '"' . .' ' ' Associate $105.00 - $120.00 ~. ': · ~-..."-.'.; · oenior Engineer/Plauner $80.00 - $105.00 ~ '.'"' .'"'i . :...'.: "· ~ '' Engineer/Planner $65.00- $80.00 .... '"' Senior Technical Support $60.00 - $70.00 ~:,-' .' '-' . .~ ~- , -.~...? Administrative Support $40.00 - $65.00 ~;:.. · .... ,-:. ~.,.. ~ .... Intern ,imbursable expenses are invoiced at cost plus 10% for handling including the following: Reproduction work at $0.10 per sheet .... ' , ':"'...- "' .-"". .' ' '". "'" 'i. · ':. .. : · ... ..... '~,.., . ~. ~ City Hall i 0300 Torte Avenue ~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 77%3255 Citv of FAX: (408) 777-3366 up, rt o SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ( Meeting Date: September 20, 1999 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Schedule Nuisance Abatement Hearing BACKGROUND On July 6, 1999 a complaint was made to the Code Enforcement Division regarding the property located at 862 Bette Avenue, Cupertino. The following violations were reported: (1) Weeds were extremely high in the front and side yards creating a possible fire hazard. · - (2) There was a large accumulation of garbage and refuse being stored in the front yard. Letters were subsequently sent to the property owner on July 7, August 3, and August 19, 1999. All letters have been returned. RECOMMENDATION: Set hearing regarding the public nuisance. ;~fitte::l by: Approv_~y; Human Resources Manager -City Manager Printed on Recycled Paper RESOLUTION NO. 99-272 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DECLARING INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING A NUISANCE ON PARCEL 369-24-048 862 BETTE AVENUE, WEEDS AND ACCUMULATIONOF GARBAGE AND REFUSE IN FRONT AND SIDE YARDS WHEREAS, Section 1.09.03A of the Cupertino Municipal Code defines a nuisance as anything which is declared by the City Council to be or likely to become injurious to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property; and WHEREAS, there exist extremelcy high weeds in the front and side yards, creating a possible fire hazard; and a large accumulation of garbage and refuse being stored in the front yard on parcel 369-24-048; and WHEREAS, as provided by Ordinance No. 794, the City Council shall hold a public hearing to determine whether or not said condition constitutes a public nuisance and, if said determination is made, the City Council shall require abatement of said public nuisance by immediate removal of all debris/trash. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino does, upon adoption of this resolution, establish the date of October 18, 1999, 6:45 p.m., as the time and 10300 Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California as the place wherein public testimony will be taken relative to the determination as to whether or not a public nuisance exists and if so determined, what type of abatement is necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20~ day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue cupertino, CA 95014-3245 -- (408) 777-3354 of FAX (408) 777-3333 Cupertino PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM 7 AGENDA DATE September 20, 1999 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Award of contract for Traffic Engineering Services for Interstate Route 280 at Wolfe Road Interchange Traffic Safety Improvement Project BACKGROUND The City requested Statements of Qualifications from traffic engineering consultants for engineering services for the Interstate Route 280 at Wolfe Road Intemhange Traffic Safety Improvement Project. The project consists of evaluating traffic safety measures to reduce the number of accidents. In addition to the City's work at that intemhange, there is an approved project by Caltrans to modify the ramp configuration by realigning the northbound 280 to northbound Wolfe Road. This project is to be totally funded by the State. A grant has been received from the Hazard Elimination Safety Program by the federal government in the amount of $500,000, which is a fully funded grant. The consultant portion is $113,002. Proposals were received from four companies: DKS Associates, TJKM Transportation Consultants, Mark Thomas & Co., Inc. and CCS Planning & Engineering, Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council award the project to DKS Associates in the amount of $113,002.00 Su itted y: A~,~rov~d for submission: _ ~Director of~ublic Works City Manager City Hall ' 10300 Torre Avenue ~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 City of FAX (408) 777-3333 Cupertino PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM / O ~ AGENDA DATE September 20, 1999 Designating Preferential Parking Zone on Byrne Avenue between McClellan Road and San Femando Avenue BACKGROUND Residents of Byrne Avenue submitted a petition that requested a permit parking zone between McClellan Road and San Femando Avenue. This neighborhood has seen an increase in parking overflow from Monta Vista High School and Lincoln Elementary School by students and parents. Over the past several years, streets adjacent to the schools have implemented preferential parking zones, resulting in more encroachment onto this portion of Byrne Avenue. The petition has been signed by 70% of the resident owners (19 out of 27) of this neighborhood. They understand that permits will be needed for parking on the street and all vehicles will be subject to enforcement. The permit parking hours will be 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, while school is in session. .. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99- , designating permit parking on Byme Avenue between McClellan Road and San Fernando Avenue. .... ]~.ert J. Vi~?v.ic..h .... ~ Dodgid~b. ~"~ow~ p irector of ?ublic Works City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 99-273 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DESIGNATING PBRMIT PARKING ON BYRNE AVENUE BETWEBN MCCLBLLAN ROAD AND SAN FBRNANDO AVBNUE WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1197 of the City of Cupertino ordains that a preferential parking zone be established in Cupertino in which parking will be prohibited on streets as designated by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, exemption to such prohibition shall be by parking permit as established in said Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said parking prohibition shall apply Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. when school is in session. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20~ day of September, 1999, by the following vote:' Vote 'Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue ~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 City of Cupertino PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM / ~.~- AGENDA DATE September 20, 1999 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Designating Preferential Parking Zone on Santa Teresa Drive between Hyannisport Drive and Columbus Avenue BACKGROUND Residents of Santa Teresa Drive submitted a petition that requested a permit parking zone between Hyannisport Drive and Columbus Avenue. This neighborhood has seen an increase in parking overflow from Monta Vista High School and Kennedy Middle School by students, parents, and staff. Over the past several years, streets adjacent to the schools have implemented preferential parking zones, resulting in more encroachment onto this portion of Santa Teresa Drive. The petition has been signed by 75% of the resident owners (21 out of 28) of this neighborhood. They understand that permits will be needed for parking on the street and all vehicles will be subject to enforcement. The permit parking hours will be 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, while school is in session. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 99- , designating permit parking on Santa Teresa Drive between Hyannisport Drive and Columbus Avenue. E._rector of..'?ublic Works City Manager / Printed on Recycled Paper I 0 ~'~ [ RESOLUTION NO. 99-274 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DESIGNATING. PERMIT PARKING ON SANTA TERESA DRIVE BETWEEN HYANNISPORT DRIVE AND COLUMBUS AVENUE WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1197 of the City of Cupertino ordains that a preferential parking zone be established in Cupertino in which parking will be prohibited on streets as designated by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, exemption to such prohibition shall be by parking permit as established in said · Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said parking prohibition shall apply Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. when school is in session. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20th day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:. ATTEST: APPROVED: RESOLUTION NO. 99-275 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES FROM FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CUPERTINO; LOCATED 10525 MILLER AVENUE, APN 369-16-001 WHEREAS, First Baptist Church of Cupertino has executed a Grant of Easement which is in good and sufficient form, conveying to the City of Cupertino, Grantee, an easement for storm drain purposes over the pwperty situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, moro particularly de, scribed in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached h~reto and made a part hereof. All that certain real pwperty situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, located at 10525 Miller Avenue, APN 369-16-001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tho City of Cupertino accept said grant so tendered; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record - said Grant of Easement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20th day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members o_fthe City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino GRANT OF EASEMENT STORM DRAIN PURPOSES APN: 369-16-001 10525 Miller Avenue First Baptist Church of Cupertino, A California Corporation, hereinai~er called Grantor, hereby grant(s) to the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called Grantee, the right to excavate for, install, replace (of the initial or any other size), maintain and use for storm drain purposes as Grantee shall from time to time elect within the hereinafter described property of certain premises which are situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, and described as follows: (See Exhibit A & B) Grantor hereby further grants to Grantee the right and privilege to enter upon his lands contiguous to and along the line of said hereinabove described strip for the purpose of locating, constructing, repairing, maintaining, or replacing said storm drain or appurtenances thereto, for the purpose of doing any necessary or lawful act in connection with the construction or maintenance of said storm drain; there is also granted the right of the use of sufficient land contiguous to said strip on either or both sides thereof for the purposes of excavation of and deposit of earth and necessary building material during the time of constructing said storm drain and any repair thereof. The foregoing is subject to the following express conditions: The Grantee agrees to restore the ground surface and any improvements thereon to its original grade or condition insofar as it is practicable and reasonable to do so. ~l WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have executed this Grant of Easement this ~.~day Owne~: First Baptist Church of Cupertino A California Corporation By: A.~b~ Title: Pastor (Notary acknowledgment to be attached) LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California being a storm drain easement over, upon or under the parcel of land described as follows: Beginning at the northeasterly corner of that certain parcel of land labeled as Remainder Lot as shown on that certain Map entitled, "Tract No. 9143", filed for record in Book 718 of Maps at pages 17 and 18, Santa Clara County Records, said point being on the westerly line of Miller Avenue as shown on said Map; thence along the westerly line of said Miller Avenue and the easterly line of said Remainder Lot S 2.°18'05'' W 68.81 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left th~ a central angle of 12050' 19" with a radius of 590.00 feet for an arc length of 132.21 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the right thru a central angle of 9°55'41'' with a radius of 410.00 feet for an arc length of 71.04 feet to the northeasterly corner of Howard Court as shown on said Map; thence along the northerly line of said Howard Court along a compound curve to the right thru a central angle of 92054'38'' with a radius of 20.00 feet for an arc length of 32.43 feet; thence N 87°41 '55" W 5.00 feet; thence leaving said line of Howard Court N 00°25'58'' E 291.26 feet to the northerly line of said Remainder Lot; thence along said northerly line S 88°19'16".E 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel of land containing 4,050 square feet or 0.093 acres, more or less. Prepared by: ~ ~. 140 Marvin D. Kirkcby " R.C.E. No. 14001 ~/~'Exp. $.r~1/o 'KIRKEBY ENGINEERING PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION SCALE: /"-,90' 2397 FOREST AVENUE ,]( DATE: ,~UG./o)9=) SAN JOSE, CA 95128 (408) 984-0331 ' ~\/ JOB NO. 9807/,, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF Santa Clara On 09/01/99 before me, Juli Lake a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Albert J. Baker , personally known to me (or prove/~to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose na~ (s~are subscribed to the with~n instrument and acknowledged to me tha~ hA/she/they executed the same i~/her/their authorized capacity(ies), an~hat by : her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon if of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my ha/nc%.-.an~ official seal. THIS CERTIFICATE M~ST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DBSC~IBED A~: Titl~ or type of Document: Grant of Easement No. of Pages: one Date of Document: September 1, 1998 Signer(s) other than named above: none O ~"~ COMM. # '1200868 t'~ u,~~ COMM. # '1200868 ~I~"Z'~ ~i~'.,~- ~INOTANY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA-, .'~{~'~,~.~ ~NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA ~ ~*~._~.~/ COMM. EXP. NOV. 6, 2002 ~ ~ ~/ COMM. ~X.. NOV. ,, ~00:~ RESOLUTION NO. 99-276 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCEPTING QUITCLAIM DEED AND NON-EXCLUSIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR UNDBRGROUND WATBR RIGHTS FROM THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSB, A CORPORATION SOLE, 22555 CRISTO REY DRIVB, APN 342-63-002,005 WHEREAS, The Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose, a corporation sole, has executed a "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization", which is in good and sufficient form, quitclaiming all its rights in and authorizing the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, to extract water from the underground basin, underlying that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly described as follows: All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, as shown and delineated on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Cupertino accept said .... "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" so tend,~xl; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record said "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" and this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of thc City Council of the City of . Cupertino this 20'h day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members o_.fthe City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Recording Requested By And After Record Return To: City of Cupertino Attn: Director of Public Works 10300 Tone Avenue Cuptertino, CA 95014-3255 QUITCLAIM DEED AND NON-EXCLUSIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS APN: 342-63-002 and 342-63-005 Address: 22555 Cristo Rey Drive, Los Altos, California THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSE, a corporation sole, hereinafter referred to as the "GRANTOR," this 7th day of ~qo_ptomho_r' ,1999, hereby grants, bargains, assigns, conveys, remises, releases and forever quitclaims unto the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "GRANTEE," its successors and assigns, the right, title, interest, estate, claim and demand, both at Iaw and in equity,' and as well in possession as in expectancy of the GRANTOR as owner of that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, and specifi6ally described as 'follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" to pump, take or otherwise extract water from the underground basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley for beneficial use upon the lands overlying said underground basin, and GRANTOR hereby irrevocably authorizes GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, on behalf of the GRANTOR and its successors in ownership or overlying lands in the said lots to take from said underground basin within the said lots water which the owner or owners of said overlying 30119858.1/'/'3304-0005 09101/99 11:59 AM '-' lands may be entitled to take for beneficial use on said lands and to supply such water to such owner or owners or others as a public utility; provided, however, that nothing contained in this instrument shall be deemed to authorize GRANTEE to enter upon any of the lots delineated upon the above described map or to authorize GRANTEE to make any withdrawal of water which will result in any damage to any building or structure erected upon said lots. This grant of water rights is not exclusive and notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained .in this quitclaim deed, Crrantor reserves the right for itself and its successors and assigns to drill, appropriate, extract and utilize water from wells to be located on the land described in Exhibit "A" (the "Property") and to import, appropriate and transport .water for the use and benefit of the Property from wells located on lands outside the Property; provided that any source of water obtained from wells is permitted by and conforms to all roles and regulations of the Santa Clara Valley Water District or any successor agency. This assignment, conveyance and authorization is made for the benefit of lots within the above described plat and description and shall bind the owner of said lots within said plat and description. IN WI~rNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has executed this insti'ument the day and ' year first above Written. OWNER: TIlE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSE, a ~orporatio~. 2--,~ ' M)~)lael J. Mitchell, Vicar General .- Attomey4n Fact 2 /z, 30119858.1 OPTIONAL SECTION STATE OF CALIFORNIA '~ CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER Though statute does not require the Notary to fill in the data below, doing so may prove COUNTY OF invaluable to persons relying on the document. On ~.fl...t,.. 7, I¢l~Ibeforeme, ~'~t'['~'~, (~,~.'~'~':' , Notary Public, F1 INDIVIDUAL [3 CORPO.ATE OFFiCER(S) personally appeared I~r~r. ~ i'~.~n..I 5' ~(~' ~'-~ ~zt t NAME(,t~ OF SIGNER(~. TITLE(S) . rsonally known to me - OR [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED evidence to be the person(s) whose E]GENERAL name(s) is/are subscribed to the within [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in [] TRUSTEE(S) his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR that by his/her/their signature(s) on the [] OTHER: .... ,~ - - -'- - -_. instrument the person(s), or the entity I ,4~i;~;~ MNITNCOgTEZ ~ upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, ~ ~_~_#-Jan~ioTl~,~4 ~ executed the instrument. l~'~J II~m~-c.afo.~ _ \'~), . M~tectmo county Witness my hand and official seal. SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: ~ 1~41~1~. ~ ~ 10, )~ Name of Person(-,) or Entity(les) SIGNATURE OF' NOTARY OPTIONAL SECTIO.~; THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Title orType of Document Though the data requested hem is not required by law. it Number of Pages Date of Document could prevent fraudulent ,=altacl',,,~nt of this form. Signer(s) Other Than Named Above ~1993 National Notary Association. Canoga Park, CA 30119858.1 EXHIBIT 'A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real property located in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of Califomia, being all of that 58.44305 acre parcel shown as ~Parcel F" on that certain map of Tract No. 9054 filed for record in the Office of the County Recorder of Santa Clam County on July 9, 1998 in Book 705 of Maps at pages 13 through 22, together with all of that 2.76717 acre parcel shown as "Parcel G" on the same map of Tract No. 9054. · City H-II ~ 10300 Tort= Telephone: (408) 777-3255 Cupe in"c ' Code Enforcement Office STAFF REPORT Report From Alex Wykoff, Code Enforcement Division Re: The Lida Rivera property located at 19337 Phil Lane, Cupertino Subject and Issue On April 19, 1999 a complaint was made to the Code Enforcement Division regarding the property located at 19337 Phil Lane, Cupertino. The reporting party was concerned with following issues: 1) Overgrown weeds in the front yard creating a possible fire hazard. 2) A large accumulation of garbage and refuse being stored in the front yard. 3) An inoperative, unregistered vehicle abandoned in thc driveway. This office has written four letters to the property owner in an attempt to have the violations corrected. The property owner has removed the overgrown weeds and garbage from the front yard. The vehicle however, has yet to be removed from the driveway. Chronology of Events April 19, 1999: Complaint received via telephone. April 20, 1999: Inspected and photographed property. The house is vacant and appeared to be abandoned. Determined that several property maintenance' violations exist. Observed that the roof and exterior of the house was dilapidated and did not appear to be structurally sound. Referred the structural issue to the Building Division for investigation. Code Enforcement drafted and mailed a letter to the property owner related to the weeds, garbage and vehicle. (Exhibit A) April 28, 1999: Letter was returned with an expired forwarding address. Letter was re- mailed to another possible address of the property owner. May 5, 1999: Inspected the property, no change in conditions. 19337 Phil Lane, Staff Report Page 2 May 6, 1999: Second letter draRed and mailed to the property owner. (Exhibit B). May 19, 1999: Property owner contacted me and requested an extension to have the violations corrected. A three week extension was granted. June 1, 1999: Received a second complaint on the property via "Sound Off" card. (Exhibit C). June 12, 1999: Inspected the property and observed that the overgrown weeds and garbage had been removed. Property owner advised she was having difficulty removing the vehicle but would continue her efforts. June 13, 1999: Received a third complaint regarding the vehicle in the driveway now being vandalized. June 22, 1999:. Inspected property, no change in conditions. Final letter drafted and mailed to the owner. (Exhibit D). July 22, 1999: Inspected property, no change in conditions, no contact from the property owner. Vehicle abatement notices prepared and mailed to the property owner. (Exhibit E). August 10, 1999: Nuisance abatement item placed on City Council agenda consent calendar for August 16, 1999. City Hall . 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 --. Telephone (408) 777-3228 · Fax (408) 777-3333 Building Department CUPE iNO SUMMARY Agenda Item No. · Meeting Date: September 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Nuisance Abatement Hearing BACKGROUND: A complaint was filed with the Building Department concerning the residence at 19337 Phil Lane, Cupertino. It was reported that the residence was in a substandard state, having - large holes in the roof. Letters were sent on May 17 and June 7, 1999 to the property owner concerning this matter. On August 3, 1999 another site visit was made. The property owner has not responded to any of my correspondence or made any attempt to correct the situation. August 26, 1999, September 8, 1999, September 14, 1999 site visits were made. No change was noticed with the exception of windows are now being broken. August 31, 1999 the Resolution no 99-243 and Notice of Hearing to Abate Nuisance was mailed to the owner.by certified mail. The property was also posted on August 31, 1999 with the Notice of Hearing to Abate Nuisance. RECOMMENDATION: To abate the nuisance either by repair or demolition. Submitted by: Approvp~l for~Submission: '-~osep~t u~~i~-- .~d~ Chief Building Official City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 99-277 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ORDERING ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 19337 PHIL LANE RECITALS: (a) On August 16, 1999, the City Council of the City of Cupertino adopted its Resolution No. 99-243, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof by reference; (b) Pursuant thereto, the City Council of the City of Cupertino held a hearing with respect thereto, on September 20, 1999, at 6:45 p.m., in the Council Chambers, in the City Hall, located at 10300 Torte Avenue; (c) The following members of the City Council were' present: BurneR, Chang, James, Statton, Dean; (d) The following members of the City's staff, among others, were present: 1. Director of Administrative Services Carol Atwood 2. City Clerk Kimberly Smith 3. City Attorney Charles Kilian (e) The following interested persons were also present: (O After hearing opening remarks, the City Council heard and considered all relevant evidence including, but not limited to, testimony under oath from owners, witnesses and parties interested, as well as received into evidence exhibits and staff reports, relative to said matter;, (g) Following the presentation of all evidence and closing remarks, the City Council considered the matter, and resolved as follows: 1. The following findings of fact are hereby made: (a) Notice of the time and place of the hearing to abate, and Resolution No. 99-243 were duly and regularly posted and served, as required by the provisions of Ordinance No. 794 of the City of Cupertino, enacted on April 18, 1977. Resolution No. 99-277 Page 2 (b) The inoperative, unregistered vehicle parked in the driveway and the substandard roof at 19337 Phil Lane in the City of Cupertino, State of California, constitutes a public nuisance, in that said conditions constitute a hazard to public health, safety and general welfare,, by reason of threatening the free use and enjoyment of adjoining property. 2. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: (a) Said public nuisance shall be abated. (b) A description of the needed corrections and/or repairs, necessary to comply with the abatement order is as follows: · Repair/removal ofthe vehicle at 19337 Phil Lane by October 4, 1999; and repair/demolition of the house at 19337 Phil Lane by October 18, 1999. (c) Any property owner shall have the right to have the public nuisance, as declared, abated, pwvided the same is completed as per Item 2Co) of this Resolution, which time, upon good cause shown, may be extended for a reasonable time by the City Council. (d) If such public nuisance is not abated within such time or any extension of time which may be granted, the. Director of Administrative Services shall, by City forces or private contract, cause the same to be abated. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 20i day of September, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino nuisanc~aba~.do~ RESOLUTION NO. 99-243 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DECLARING INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING A NUISANCE AT 19337 PHIL LANE - INOPERATIVE, UNREGISTERED VEHICLE, AND A SUBSTANDARD ROOF WHEREAS, Section 1.09.03A of the Cupertino Municipal Code defines a nuisance as anything which is declared by the City Council to be or likely to become injurious to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use ofproperty, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property; and WHEREAS, there exists an inoperative, unregistered vehicle parked in the driveway at 19337 Phil Lane; and WHEREAS, the roof at 19337 Phil Lane is substandard; and WHEREAS, as provided by Ordinance No. 794, the City Council shall hold a public hearing to determine whether or not said condition constitutes a public nuisance and, if said determination is made, the City Council shall require abatement of said public nuisance by repair/removal of automobile, and repair/demolition of house. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino does, upon adoption of this resolution, establish the date of September 20, 1999, .6:45 p.m., as the lime and 10300 Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California as the place wherein public testimony will be taken relative to the determination as to whether or not a public nuisance exists and if so determined, what type of abatement is necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 16th day of August, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: BurneR, Chang, Dean, James, Statton NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Kimberly Smith /s/ Wally Dean City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino City of Cupertino 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 CITY OF CUPER TINO Community Development Department Planning Department / Agenda Item No. / ~' Agenda Date: September 20, 1999 Application: 3-TM-99 Applicant: Judy Chen Location: 7359 Rainbow Drive Project Data: General Plan Designation: High Density Residential, 20-35 dwellings/gr, ac. Zoning Designation: P(RES 10-20) Environmental Assessment: Categorically exempt Application Summary: Tentative map to subdivide a 14,661square-foot parcel into eight lots (one lot will be held in common) for an.approved townhouse development. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a tentative map to subdivide a 14,661 square foot parcel into eight lots (one lot will be held in common) for an approved townhouse development. DISCUSSION: The applicant received approval in late 1998 to construct a seven-unit townhouse development on Rainbow Drive. At the time of the use permit approval, many site issues typically brought to l!ght during the tentative map application were discussed and resolved, such as tree protection and site drainage. As a result, this tentative map is consistent with the approved use permit, with the exception of the removal of one tree, and does not pose any new concerns for staff. Drainage: During the use permit hearing process, neighbbrs voiced concern over the drainage of the proposed development. The Public Works and Planning Division staff worked with the applicant and the neighbors to resolve the drainage problem. As a result, conditions of approval were added to the use permit resolution addressing the drainage. These same conditions will be included in the tentative map resolution. Tree Removal: Also during the use permit process, the applicant agreed to protect a 19" Deodor Cedar tree located on the northwest comer of the property: The applicant agreed to protect the tree.as a concession to concerned neighbors. However, during the tentative map process, the applicant has discovered the tree will be severely impacted by the new construction and may not last more than two years after the completion of the construction. At the recommendation of a certified arborist (see attached report), the applicant requested permission to remove the tree and replace it with a 36" box tree, to be approved by staff, which will grow within the confined space. Planning Commission Meeting: At the September 13, 1999 planning commission meeting, the commission heard testimony from adjoining property owners who expressed interest in the tree remaining. The commission denied the applicant's request to remove the tree and is requiring the tree bond not be released until 24 months following the final building permit inspection on the property. To increase the tree's chance to survive, a condition of approval has been added to the resolution requiring the applicant to enter into a contract with a certified arborist. Furthermore, the condition requires natural grade be maintained around the tree so as not to impact the tree root structure. Staff, in consultation with the project arborist, will approve the landscape plan detailing how natural grade will be maintained around the tree. A bond of $10,000, to be released 24 months after the final building inspection, will be required to assure the tree is not harmed during construction. RECOMMENDATION: The planning commission ree°mmends approval of the subject subdivision based upon the conditions of approval contained in the attached planning commission resolution. Submitted by: Approv~,~ for Submittal: '1 s. Cow n Director of Community Development City Manager Enclosure: PC Resolution No. $069 Plan Set Negative Declaration Initial Study Arborist reports g/planning/pdreport/pc/pc3 tm992, doc ( 3 -TM-99 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION 5069 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 14,661 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL INTO EIGHT LOTS FOR AN APPROVED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AT 7359 RAINBOW DRIVE SECTION I: FINDINGS: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section H. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required 'by the Subdivision and Procedural' Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidable injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems. f) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That alter careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application 3-TM-99 for a Tentative Map is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution be~nning on page 2 thereof, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 3-TM-99, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of September 13, 1999, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution 5069 3-TM-99 September 13, 1999 Page -2- SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 3-TM-99, (14-EA-99) Applicant: Judy Chen Location: 7359 Rainbow Drive SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation for approval is based upon the submitted exhibits labeled Sheet 1 and dated 5/28/99, except as revised by these conditions of approval. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS ~" ". "The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that' the 90-day approval period in which you may protest'these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day · period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred fxom later challenging such exactions. 3. TREE PROTECTION The Deodor Cedar located at the northwest comer of the subject property shall be protected by maintaining natural grade surrounding the tree. The landscape design maintaining natural grade shall be approved by staffin eonsuitafion with the project arbofist. A contract shall be entered into with an Internationally Certified Arborist and a copy submitted to staff. The purpose of the contract will include an agreement to participate in initial site inspection prior to demolition, grading or construction activity to confirm protection measures are in place, participation in plan development which requires the arborist be involved prior to building demolition, grading and road construction plans to confirm recommended practices are proposed. The contract shall also require that the arborist submit quarterly reports to staff confirming site inspections have been completed and recommended protection measures are being met. A bond in the amount of $10,000 shall be submitted for all specimen sized trees required to be protected during development (demolition, grading and construction). This money may be released following final inspection (24 months following the final building inspection) by the above referenced arborist. The arborist shall submit in writing a report stating the trees have been adequately protected during construction and have not been adversely affected by the construction. Should the Deodor Cedar die due to poor health, the applicant shall replace the De. odor Cedar with a 36" box tree, which will grow within the cox~fined space. The location of the replacement tree shall be approved by staff. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be-provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. Resolution 5069 3-TM-99 September 13, 1999 Page -3- 5. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 6. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be approved by. the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoimg properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 7. FIRE HYDRANTS Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. 8. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 9. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in/tccordance with Ordinance No. 125. 10. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 11. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Surface flow across public sidewalks may be allowed in the R-l, R-2 and R-3 zones unless the City Engineer deems storm drain facilities necessary. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected-to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Drainage from neighboring properties at northeastern edge shall not be impeded during or after construction in order to preserve the natural flow along existing s. torm and sewer easement. 12. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 13. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Resolution 5069 3-TM-99 September 13, 1999 Page -4- ' Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $1,975.00 minimum b. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 3,000.00 c. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 926~acre + ($70 X 7) = $802.00 d. Power Cost: $75.00 per streetlight e. Map Checking Fees: $459.00 f. Park Fees: $9,000.00/lot g. Grading Permit: 5% of on-site improvement Cost or $156.00 min. The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 14. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 15. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Works for water service to the subject development. 16. FIRE ACCESS LANES Emergency fire access lanes shall be recorded as fire lane easements on the final map and shall meet Central Fire District standards. 17. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity that disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERiNG/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. Bert. Viskovieh, City Engineer Resolution §069 3-TM-99 September 13, 1999 Page -5- ' PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13~ day of September, 1999, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Robert S. Cowan /s/ David Doyle Robert S. Cowan David Doyle, Chairman Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission g:\pla~ning\pdreport/res/3tm99 ,4"7 CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARATION September 20, 1999 As provided by the Environmental Assessmem Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on September 20, 1999. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 14-EA-99 Application No.(s): 3-TM-99 Applicant: Judy Chen Location: 7359 Rainbow Drive DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Tentative Map .to subdivide a 14,661 sq. ft. parcel into seven lots for an approved townhouse development. FINDINGS OF DECISIONMAKING BODY The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistem with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on 1999. City Clerk g:/planning/erc/ncg 14ea99 · aPR--29--99 08:59 ~M 585912456 408?358828+ P.02 CITY OF CUPI~LR.TI~O 10300 To~ ^wnu~ Deplrtmcnt of Community ]Dm, cJopm~nt Cupertino. Ca 950 408-777-3308 Stat'fUse Only EA. Fire I',/o. Case Filg No. PROJECT D~ESCR/PTION: Atlachments ? ProJect/*[tie "~1-,.~ y Project Location ~$6"~ ,~,d~,/3,,~ "D~,~t= / ~,-./'-~,'~/~/e .~_ ProJect Description Environmental Se.ttin$ '~.:;::,:.** .. PROJECT DESCRIPTION*' Site Area (ac.) ,3'~J Build~ng Coverage -a.,~ .,4 Exist. Bu!?nr._,s.f. Proposed Bldg.~' ~/~.f. Zone ~'~/f~~. DesisnadoL~ lfRes[c~ntisl, Unh/Oron Acre / TotaW RentBl/Own Bdrms Total s,r. Price Unit #1 Unit T pe Unit Unit Unit Appli~ble Special Are~ Plans: (Check) · ~ Month Vista Design 0uidelines ~ S. De Anza Conceptual f~J N. De Ann Conceptual t==--J $. Sa~-gunny Conceptual ~ Stevens Grk Blvd. Gormeptual L==--I Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & I,'sc~pe If Non-Residential, Buildin$ Ar~a ~J.f. FAR Max. £mployees/ShJR Pm'king Required . Parking Provided Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service ~ YES_._~NO I INITIAL STUDY SOURCE LIST A) GENERAL PLAN SO~JRt'~S D) oUT$11}£ AG~NCl~ 2) C~n~ G,ne~ ~l~ Public 5afc~ El~cnt 24) Adj~enc Ci~'s Pl~nlnG 3) C~ O~ PIM, Houing Glgment 23) Coun~ ~p~men~ o~vJmnnmnml ~) Cu~cK~o G~ Pl~. En~m~cnt~ R~ou~S 2~ Coun~ P~ ~d P~o~ntioe ~p~cnt 6) Cu~nino ~ ~ Appendix A- HilIsi~ ~vclopmunt ~) C~ino 5~i~ OisKiet 7) Cu~ ~ Pl~. L~d Uec M~ 29) Pmmont Union HiGh StOol District B) ~ Eie~nt ~nd~nt 30) Cup~ino flish S~h~l to) c~n~ ~n~ ~u Cons~ifl~ ~ps ~) C~t~ FiR D~ ~3) County Shedr 24) B) CUP~NO SO~C~ DO~ IS) Coun~ T~po~ntlofl ti) T~ P~n o~e ~8 36) Safl~ Clog V~lr~y W~cr t2) c~ ~d ~u~ M~ 14) ~olos~ Xe~ ~im ~Kiflc) E) O~IDE AGENCY DO~M : ~ . -. · :;; .:," 16) ~ini ~ 3S) ~A M~d M~CVWD Mood Maps 18) ~ Noi~ ~ce 40) Co~ H~o~ W~t~ M~ent 41) Co~ Nerln~ Resou~ lflveflm~ · ~ C~ AG~CI~ 42) Snu CI~ Vnllcy W~r District Fuul Ig) Cu~ Comm~ Dcvdop~flt ~. ~ Site 20) C~ hbilc Wo~ ~L 43) C~EPA H~ Wu~ nnd 5ubs:~c~ 22) Cu~ W~ UWi~ ~ O~ER SOUR~ , M) ~ct Pl~ bY Appl~ofl 4S) Keld ~) ~onoe wi~ ~ot ofslmi~r l 4~) ABAO PmJealom Sefles .... ~ .~ ~ ..-.. .... ~. ~ ......:.~ ~ ... ;" ': 1) Complem ~ info.atica ~q~cd on 4) ~en explainin; any yes response, la~l :,. ~e Initial Study Cover parc, ~ your answer cl~rly (~ple "N - 3 B~ SPACES ONLY ~ A Hlstort~l") Ple~e ~ to ~spond concisely, SPE~C ~M ~ NOT and place ~ many explunu~ responses ~P~C~. possible ga each pa~e. 2) Co~ult ~e Initial S~dy Souse Li~ use ~ U~n comp[stihl ~e ohecklh~ si~ and · e me. rials li~d ~emin to complete, ~e ~ ~ Prophet's A~dnvit. ch~k[~t in~ation in Cate~rles A ·mugh O. ~ Ple~ enoch ~e ~ollowing materials ~Fore ~bmi~in~ the Initial Study to the You ~e encouraged to cite o~er ~lev~t Ci~. sources; if such soumes ~e used, Job in . ~ Pt~ s~ or~B~vu ~t (t) ·cir title(s) in "Souse" column nc t to ~e que~ion to which they to any qu~ions, you must ~aah ~ sheet INCOMPLE'I'E MAT[RIAL~ explaining thc potential impuct and susg~t ~;AE ~E P ROCt~N~ !~ ~ I)~ L,,~ ~'~ m[tigntion if needed. ]~PACT ,YES WILL THE PROJECT... NOt Sisnlfl¢ia! $18nlflmmt ~umulativ. SOURCE 5~iflc~ (MMI~ion ~o ~Ws~ Mifii~n ~ ~ USZ G~L t~ t) ~ui~ a ~anle ~ ~ l~d ~ 1,7,8 3) ~ui~ m ~p or~ ~d ~ ~M or dlvi~ ~e ph~ ~i~d? B) G~OL~I~MIC ~d~ ~ m~ ,,olo,lo ~? ~ ~ D ~ ~ 2,]4 2) Be I~d ~ or MJ~ ~ a ZoM? 2 s~s~ll, ~il ~N~ or ~ ~.I0 ~ Cm nbs~fll d~, ~pMme~ ~mp~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ 2.14.39 · ....' ov~d~ orsoil oi~ ~i~ ~ off- ~ C~ su~dd ~p ~ ~ h~ ~n oft hild~ ~) RESOURCES/PARKS 1) ln~rm~ du existing removal ~, m S,t0 I~ u ~& sm& ~av.I. n~ m~s ~u i w ~ nils) ~ o~M ~ YES TVILL THE PROJECT... ~o: 51FEfl¢~m Slinfll~m Cum.lmive SOURCE NO Pm~Ed) Pm~d) 5) Su~d~ly ~ect ~y exlstln~ ~bllc or pd~om mo~eatlo~ ~111~. p~. ~ldlih p~K publie ~il eider in e~s~nce ~y 0r pl~ned ~ ~ Impl~? . D) SEWAGF, AVATER QU,~t,JTY l) I~e~ult irt & sepal& field beini consbl~ted on soil wid3 severe d,ainfleld. ~ D D [] [~ 6.9 pe~olmmsc~ limitations? 2) Rasuit [n ~ sepdo Geld bbj ~ ~u~ lnfllnllofl ofm~d I) lam'l~ lUbl~nlbJl)'.wl~ Found 20,36 3) Sa~fldly G~ ~ di~i~ ~ ~ flow ~ q~fi~ of ~ ~, o,.llm~,i~r ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 20~6.42 or~ ~wm. ~ tach ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 36.42 ~r ~ lo.ns. ~um ~ ~ oFiu S) Be Ixmd in 8 fl~w~ or F) FLORA AND IPAUNA IM~)ACT WILL THE PROJECT... ~o~ sisnificLnt Si~nlf~i :~,~,d~' SOURCE NO ~ Mffillion ~) en~ J~hs ofplmt or ~ b ziu or 0 HEALTH AND SAFETY ,) ~,.,.,,~..b.., ffi E] D 12] D ,.,0.42., dispo~ or mndimur~ ofpoW~idl), hurdom mmd~b? ~ r-! r-I [=-I I~1 32,43 3) bwolve rblc ofixplolloa ar other bnu oruaeoa~ted r~lem or lunrdow mb~tmon? ~) bn, ofve U removal ar ~ontinued ,J~ 0 C~ 0 ~ 33.42.43 un ot st~, alt~l, or Jmt~l~on or my Pew und~rlMu~ dmnlcd or bt .) ..,..~,..--or--o~.. ~ D I-'1 D D 2," event ora bnaJtdown? RPR--2~--~ 08.'52 PIH 585'9124:~6 4087558828+ P. ~7 WILL THE PRO~... SOURCE Not Si~fllflc~l Slsni~c~nt Cumuiatlv~ Si~ific~t (~lltij~ti~ ~o ~0 Pm~) hlltt~ion ~poscd~ 6) Pmvi~ bm~ln~ ~unds ~r J) AIR, QUALITY 2) Vbhtle my ambient air quality ,trod.ds, conu'ibute subs.ti.lty to an ~ [~ [~] D O $,37,42 exlstin[ el' pro~eeted nit quality violation. or expose sensitive f~c~ptors to substantiM concgatmdofls of pollutants? M) ENERGY quamides of fbuil bela ar non- summ~ shgd~ or wind-breaks to an ~ D [--'] D [~ ti.19 cxjsdn~ or propaNd bulldin~ 3) SJgnlfle. Mdy ~uc~ solar acc~ to =-~j=..,~.~.,.b,,..~.=.. ~ ID O D D ,.,9 space or prtvat~ yard? N) IIlSTORICA, U ;IrCh4L'Ql~JJc:d or paloonmloSic, sl resources? .- · .' :.. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ,' '..'~.~ ' (To Be Completed by City Staff) · ::.::~..~.... .. ..~, .. _ .. _ ·'ILI, TI. IF, PRO,~ECT'... YES NO 1. Have the potenllal ~o subslLqtially da~rede the quality ofthe enviroumeut. ~o subslanlially diminish tha h~bitat oE · ~sh or wildlife species; to cause ,~ fi~h or wildXfe populetion to drop below self-s~staiuable levels.' to threaten o~ eliminate a phnl or animal community; ~o reduc~ the number of or restrict the nmse of,, rare or endaflsered plant or ~nimal; to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California's histotT or prehistoO'? 2. Have the potential to achieve short term environmental seals to the .... r.: .. disadvantage of lens term environmeataI Soais? I .,~.. I 3. Have environmental impaq'ts which am htdividtmlly limited, but ar~ cumulatively conskterable? ("Cumuhtivel7 considerable: means the~ the i I incmnental effects of'an individual project are substantive when viewed in conJunction with the effects of pest projects, other current projects, and probable ~uture projects) 4. Haw environmental eff'eGts which will cause substantial adver~ impacts on human haines, either directly or indirecti~ I hereby certi~ that the information provided In this Initial Study is lrue and correct to th*e best of'my knowledso and '.....: belief; I certi~, that I have used proper diligence in respondin8 accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted .. appropriate source r~erences wben necessary to ensure ~!1 and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. i hereby tcknowledse than any substantial alters dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby ar, r~ to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its stat'rand authorized siena, ~m the consequences of such dehy or dbcontinunc,. ,..,.......=. Print Preperer's Nam, ~)"' C~C~ ._.. · .' ENVIRONMENTAL. EVALUATION · . . · · (To be Completed by City Staff) IMPACT AREAS: ]~Land Use/General Plan [] Geologic/Seismic Hazard [] Resources/Parks ~ Housing [] Sewage/Water Quality [] Drainage/Flooding [] 'Flora & Fauna [] Transportation [] Historical/Archaeological [] Health & Safety [] Air Quality ~ Noise [] Public Services/Utilities [] Energy [] Aesthetics STAFF EVALUATION On the basis of this Initial Study, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Finds: Select One That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant effect will occur because mitigation measures are included in the project. ERC recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That the Proposed IV'~AY have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that an ['~. .~. ,.".NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared. g/planning~nt~tdy4.doc RAY MOgNEAU o ARBORIST - 135¢- Dale Ave. #8, Mountain View, CA 94040 · Telel2hone: 650-964-7664 eMail: rmarboris(@aol.como http://members.aol.com/RMArboris~ Pre-Construction ARBORIST'S REPORT PROJECT CLIENT REPORT DATE Eight Unit Townhouse Ms. Judy Chert March 12, 1998 7359 Rainbow Drive Cupertino, California Contents '. 1.0 Scope and Purpose, '1. 2.0 Site Description, 1. 3.0 Tree Chart, !. 4.0 Tree inventory Methods, 2. 5.0 Introduction to Tree Protection Measures, 3. ,.-, 6.0 Site-Specific Tree Protection Measures, 4 - 8. i':" ':-"' (7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino) 'i'... 6.1 Pre-Construction, 4-6. " 6.2 During Construction, 6 - 8. 6.3 Follow-up, 8. 7.0 Appendices: 7.1 Site Plan with Tree Locations, 9. 7.2 Consultant Qualifications, 10. 7.3 Background Cautions, 10. 7.4 Literature/Authorities, 10 - 11. Ray Morneau. Arborist: Certified Arborist's Report ['or Judy Chen: 7.159 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. 1.0 Scope and Purpose This pre-construction certified arborist's report results from my obsem'ation and inspection of the existing trees at 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino, Calitbmia. I have reviewed a copy ora drawing by Metro Design Group: Sheet A-l, dated 2-16-98. This report provides data for this site's significant existing trees, makes tree=specific recommendations, and suggest~ site-specific tree protection measures. 2.0 Site Description This site is in the comer of the neighborhood southwest of the Highway 85 and Sunnyvale- Saratoga Road interchange. It is currently occupied by a 6-plex apartment building with its :~"~:'"" asphalt parking lot. 4~..:-.' ' This site's climate is in USDA plant hardiness zone 9 (USDA, 1949, p. 817). The micro-climate conforms to the Sunset (1995, p. 29) zone 16. 3.0 Tree Chart [ · Retention Tree Condition Location Trunk Status & Protection Number Specle~ Diameter Ke~p Cut I Plan 9801 Cedar (Cedrus deodara) 19.1" X !46% (Poor) -Although drawn to remain, should be removed and !replaced with a better suited specimen. Central leaderdeatroyed by ~opping years ago to ~20' tell; multiple tope regrown since. Scars and ' Inails cause trunk defects. Foliage crown is declining. If retained [instead of removed, see tree protection n~asures below. "'-. 98-02 Palm (Phoer~ix canaden$is) 28.0" X 40% (Poor) - Although green foliage, pruning has destroyed structure · · 98-03 Juniper (J. chinensis 'torulosa') 16.8' X 40~ (Poor) - Although green foliage, pruning has destroyed structure 98-04 Juniper (J. chinensis 'tcrulosa') 11.3" X 40% (Poor) -- Although green foliage, pruning has destroyed structure 96-05 .Juniper (J. chinensia 'torul~e') 11.6' X 40~ (Poet) -- Although green foliage, pruning has destroyed structure 98-06 Junil3er (J. chinensis 'torulosa') 14.5" X 40% (Poor) -Although green foliage, pruning has destroyed structure 98-07 Zall<ova (Zelkova serulata) 14.7' X S8% (Fair) -Although drawn to remain, municipal public works staff I would allow removal and replacement with an appropriate, specimen. · If retained,not removed, then see ~ protection measures below. _ Ray Momeau. Arbodst: Certified Arborisfs Report fbr Judy Chen: 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. 4.0 Tree Inventory Methods Observations were made and data taken during my on-site inspection on March 9, 1998. Further conclusions and protection measures were refined from office research, seminar information, and past experience based on those observations and data. Per the City of Cupertino's Arborist Report Guidelines, the data is encapsulized into the "Tree' Data" section above. The categories are probably self-evident with only the following notes. · 'Map Location Number: The 7 trees were assigned sequential identification numbers (98-01 through, 98-07)..The 1998-prefix on our tags unmistakably links them to this project. Each tree was tagged with a 1" X 3" rectangular aluminum tag at about the 6' level. Species: We employ the initial common names from McMinn, if listed, otherwise from Sunset. ..?'!~ Scientific/botanical names are used across many disciplines, thereby minimizing · ..:.(~ .. · ?..,:-., confusion. As applicable, we used McMinn's key and/or.Sunset's descriptions. Trunk Diameter: Per Cupertino's standard,' this measurement is the tnmk diameter at three feet · - above grade, taken with a surveyor's diameter tape, recorded in inches. Retention Status (Keep / Cut): Reflects status as per drawing. Comments added in "Tree Condition... "'box. Tree Condition & Protection Plan: Percentage rating assessing the tree's overall vigor, recent growth, insects/diseaSes, and structural defects. Relative text rating included in the same cell as: Exce. llent, Good, Fair, Poor, Very Poor. ..' '. This corresponds iO the "Condition Percentage" factor in tree valuations per the Council ;" of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA) system used by the International Society of ".'. Arboriculture. (CTLA, 1992.) It combines foliage, branches, limbs, trunk, and root ratings into a composite condition score. Notes are included regarding the most obvious defects, insects, diseases or unique characteristics. If needed, site-specific "Tree Protection Measures" are set out below. Ray Momeau, Arbodst: Certified Arborist's Report for Judy Chert: 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. 5.0 Introduction to Tree Protection Measures "All trees, regardless of where they are growing, are genetically 'forest' trees .... The closer you can keep trees' environment to that ora forest, the healthier the trees will be." (Marx, 1995, p. 4.) No two trees react the same way to construction stress. Trees which are significantly impacted but appear to continue to survive, maybe even thrive, are exceptions to the rule. Changes in the below ground environment are the most catastrophic for trees. (Koehler, 1988, p. 3.) Decline and/or death of trees might not become evident until many years later. Some authorities allow as short a time as one to three years (Britton, 1992, p. 10). Many are less specific (Dreistadt, 1994, p. 41; Hams, 1992, p. 467; Schoenweiss, 1982, p. 169). Shigo (1986, p. 553) ~ .~. extends it to ten to twelve years after construction injury. Coate (1983, p.26) notes.that it may be · :?..:~:~ :,':~,:fifteen years or more following changes beneath patriarch oaks. Construction projects in the vicinity of existing trees inevitably alter their environments. Some details of a project more or less directly than others. Examples of more directly is cutting the tree back so the project can have the space or severing roots with a trench for utility undergrounding. Less direct alterations, although no less important, include constructing surfaces which absorb heat or reflect heat back as well as' unintentional soil compaction by traffic over the root zone. (Shigo, 1986, p. 552; Harris, 1992, p. 163) The more roots which can be left undisturbed, the greater a tree's chances of survival five or ten years beyond project completion. Most authorities emphasize that the root zones may well be' the most important part of our trees on construction sites. The root zones of most trees extend well beyond the spread of the branches, and'80%' to 90% of their absorbing root systems are in ,,:'.. the top 6" to 12" of soil, maybe having some of the larger laterals down to a depth of 3" (Hagen, ~"'" 1991, p. 3; Harris, 1992, p. 309; Shigo, 1986, p. 197; Watson, Dec. 1985, p..39; Willeke, 1992, "".. p. 54). This is in contrast to the standard 6th-grade science book which has shown a 40' tall tree with a mirror-image, 40' deep, root system. In reality, root systems are much more pancake- shaped, and we must take this into consideration. Where measures cannot be taken to care for a tree, planning for its early removal and · replacement might be more prudent than needing unanticipated removal after its subsequent demise. In the interest of mitigating the impact of construction stresses to trees to remain after this project's completion, the following Site-Specific Tree Protection Measures are proposed. They become an attachment to, and thus a part of, the project's construction documents. A~ details of the project chang~ or are refined, more individual measures can be drawn up to address those variations, with particularity. March 12, 1998. Page #3 ofl I. /¥ Ray Momeau, Arborist: Certified Arborist's Report for Judy Chert: 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. 6.0 Site-Specific Tree Protection Measures (7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino) 6.1 Pre-Construction: 6.111 ~.NCE: Before other phases of the construction project be~n, a continuous protective fence must usually be installed surrounding the bases of trees to be saved. For the ideal configuration, locate the fence to maximize the exclusion of traffic over the root zones, preferably at the drip lines. The proximity of the Cedar to the proposed building and the Zelkova to the sidewalk/driveway renders the above paragraph rather impracticable. Where the construction extends under a tree's canopy, define as much of that root zone as possible. Modification of the fence lines to the building cave lines and sidewalk can ~.: be allowable, if other methods are employed to buffer the roots to be saved. Where ..:.i'i:'i~':: modification is permitted, driven fence posts will not be acceptable within four feet "~i~? · (4') of the thinks; alternative supports might include pylons or concrete post bases set on grade. - The fence material is to be orange plastic'barr/er fence, snow fence, chain link fencing, or equivalent, of 4' height (minimum). To keep fences taut and effective, commonly acceptable post placement would be at 4-6' intervals for plastic or on 6-10' centers for the more rigid chain link. "T" -style fence posts would be appropriate here; 6' posts driven 1.5' into the earth. Any fence posts must be positioned to miss obvious major roots. When near tree trunks, spans are often centered on the tree's trunk to maintain maximum distance between the posts and the larger roots. An alternative fence support could be to set the posts in concrete pylons or on galvanized pipe frames on 6' (or otherwise appropriate) centers. )'" The fence shall remain in place, standing and continuous, until the final grading stage of the project. 6.1.2. BUFFER: When areas under trees' foliage canopies cannot be fenced, yet access is necessary on top of their root zones during the project, to avoid extra stress to tree roots, it will be necessary to install and maintain a temporary buffer to absorb the load and reduce soil compaction in the root zones. The buffer shall Cover and remain in place over any traffic area within foliage canopies. Acceptable alternatives include: 6" wood chips, 4" crushed rock, or 3/4" plywood sheets nailed together. The buffer shall remain in place and be continuously maintained at ~he above specified thickness until the final grading stage of the project. If wood ch/ps are used, it could 'ultimately be possible to incorporate them into the site soil as an organic amendment, since they will have begun to break down. Other buff'er materials might need to be removed from the site a/ter this time. Ray Momeau, Arborist: Certified ,,-~'borist's Report l"or Judy Chen: 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino 6.1.3 MOISTURE in ROOT 7ONE.: Root zone moisture for this area's trees is important. Construction projects change water availability in several ways, not the least of which is severing roots (like for foundations, trenching, or re-landscaping) reducing quantity of roots capable of water uptake. If seasonal precipitation is not at least normal, supplemental watering of important trees should be considered. Watering wand, hose bubbler, soaker hose, or hydraulic tree rig could make appropriate applications. Quantity of water applied should be no less than ten (10) gallons per trunk diameter inch. A twenty (20) gallons per inch rate is often preferable, especially during the honest part of the season. Additional supplemental water applications could be required as the soil becomes dry, as should be determined by periodic inspections of the root zone soils. -;:-'--:~,, 6.1.4 pRUNING: Pi'e-construction trimming is often suggested to reduce requirements of extra -~:...-.. care in. vicinity of(or risk of damage to) new construction features. "Crown cleaning", per I.S.A. or N.A.A. published pruning standards or equivalent could be prudent. (I.S.A., 1995) 6.1.5 UTII.ITIE~ TI~.MP.: Any temporary construction site utilities (electric, water, communication, etc.) shall be placed so as not to affect foliage crowns or roots of trees to be retained. Infringement on any tree's space requires qualified arborist consultation. 6.1.6 CI.EAN'-UP AI~EA: If on-site cleaning of equipment is required for cement forms and trucks, paint brushes, plastering tools, and such, then a location must be specified, posted with a sign, and noticed to all (sub)contractors. This area cannot be situated ,-~ :.., beneath any tree's canopy nor in any (proposed) planting area. Runoff from a ".'"~:' ~ designated clean-up area can be avoided by providing a temporary base of wood '.' chips or other absorbent material to be disposed of off' site at the close of the project. 6.1.7 PRIn.-Pr.AN: To pre-plan minimizing impact on the trees by factors not addressed above, the following areas need to be identified before construction begins: a. construction traffic: entrance, exit, on-site flow, b. staging sites for construction supplies, services, trailers, etc., c. construction equipment parking, d. construction worker parking and e. any other potentially problem area (considering frequent use area and/or tree- striss activity). 6.1.8 INSPECTION & SIGN-OFF, PRE-CONSTRUCTION: A qualified arborist shall verify that the above sections have been complied with by signing off after inspection (see 6.2.12 below). March 12, 1998. Page #5 of I I. Ray Morneau, Arbcrist: Certified Arborist's Report tbr Judy Chen: 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. "6.1.9 ARBORIST. QUALI'FI'E.D: Any necessary tr~mmin§, tree repair, and/or root Pmnin§ should be done to published standards under the supervision of' a qualified arborist. Locally, a "qualified arbodst" is either a Certified ,~borist (by International Society of' A,rboriculture), or a. member of.the California Arborists' Association, or a member of.the Ameriuan Society of. Consulting A. rboris.ts. Of' course the presumption stands that to be "qualified" any chosen arborist would have appropriate e×perience with comparable projects. 6.2 During Construction: 6.2.1 PR~-RF. QUIR~.MgTNTS: Applicable requirements from "Pre-Construction" Section above shall have been implemented and remain in place. .: ~:..6.2.2 DF. MOI.ITION: To pr. eserve the important absorbing roots of trees to remain after :~:~'""~:~' construction, no unexpected cuts or fills should be allowed beneath their canopies. As demolition often requires the razing and hauling of existing structures and features, equipment operators must remain aware of nearby trees and avoid contacting them or _. their rootS. For example here, during the removal of the ex/sting building (and maybe sidewalk and driveway apron?) care must be exercised for the' adjacent trees · and their roots. During any demolition stage of this project, care must be taken when portions of a discontinued utility system are near any tree to be retained, including, but not limited to, systems for irrigation, gas, electric, water. Rather than disturbing the root system, consider stubbing offthe pipe at the tree's drip line and leaving it in place in the soil. I :..:.."-' As with other excavations, ilTwhen exposed, roots should be protected from desiccation '": (see item 6.2.6, below). 6.2.3 TR~i'CI-1ING: Intrusion beneath any tree's canopy must be minimized for all trenches, including; electric, sewer, water, gas, decorative/security lighting, or irrigation. Where practicable (and approved), use common trenches for multiple utilities. Trenches must be routed to sever only a minimum of.tree roots. Positioning trenches in roadways is often least intrusive. Trench plans within any existing dripline must be reviewed and approved by a qualified arborist before being implemented. 6.2.4 TUNNlqI.IN'G: Tunneling under mots is preferable to severing, especially for larger roots. Note "6.2.5. Excavation", below. · '- 6.2.5 I:TXCAVATION: Manual excavation and pruning methods will be used When encountering roots with a diameter exceeding 1.5" to avoid the extensive damage which heavy equipment does to roots. March 12, 1998. Page #6 of 1 I. Ray Momeau, Arborist: Certified Arbofist's Report for Judy ~hen: 73 59 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. Roots which must be severed and measure over one and one-half inches (1.5") in diameter should be cut cleanly, smoothly without crushing, shattering, or tearing. If roughly cut by heavy equipment, re-cut to sound wood. Cuts should be made to lateral roots where possible. -~ Cut & Fill Note: Avoid setting up a tractor, or other dig~ng equipment, on soil to remain undisturbed, uncompacted. Similarly, sideways sheering of roots shatters many of them back into tissue hoped to be saved. Alternatively, situate the tractor in the (to be) disturbed area and pull soil to be removed away from the tree. Note "6.2.6 Exposed Roots", below. 6.2.6 ~XPOSF. D ROOTS: Curtail drying out of small roots. Within two hours of cut or opening, cover all exposed cuts in soil containing both root hairs and newly severed or exposed roots. To retain moisture, dampened Wood chip mulch (4" deep), moist · ...:'~i.~.):. soil (3"), Or wetted, burlap (4 layers) placed against freshly cut and exposed soil are ~,,..',.:-' some choices; all must remain moist. When more'than 10% ora tree's absorbing root system is exposed or otherwise stressed, the application of an organic biostimulant, comparable to Roots TM, can reduce shock. 6.2.7 POWl~.R F. QLrI~MI~.NT: Equipment operators should be informed that machinery can cause great injm-y' to standing tr~es. They must take unique care to operate with as much distance as possible between machines and trees - branches, trunks, and roots. Any accidental damage must be promptly repaired by a qualified arborist. 6.2.8 TRAFFIC: Avoid extra stress for tree roots to.remain by positively limiting machine and vehicle traffic and parking over mots. Where traffic must pass beneath a canopy, ['.' consider placement of a buffer to absorb the load and reduce soil compaction in the · '-. root zones; wood chips, crushed rock, or plywood sheets could be alternatives. 6.2.9 IJNTN'I"~qTIONAI. GR~,D~ CN'ANG~S: Avoid grade changes such as can occur when soil or other construction materials are stored or stock-p/led beneath any tree's canoPY and thus over its root zone. When construction materials must inev/tably be stacked atop root zone areas, employ pylons or cleats beneath loads. (This would also raise an alert regarding buffering of that root zone to avoid compaction by traffic.) 6.2.10 ClqW..MIC^I.S: No storage, pouring, or leaking of any fuel, oil, or chemical may be allowed beneath a tree's canopy. Time is of the essence in the event of any size spill; prompt containment and proper clean-up is necessary. 6.2.11 USE: No signs, wires, or other construction apparatus may be attached to any tree. March 12, 1998. Pas, e #7 ofl I. Ray Momeau, A~borist: Certified .-krborist's Report for Judy, Chen: 7350 Rainbow Drive. Cupertino. 6.2.12 INSPECTIONS & SIGN~OFFS: A qualified arborist typically verifies observation of implementation/compliance with sign-offs after inspections: Often site monitoring is scheduled at weekly intervals for a cursory status report. Important milestones for sign-offs include: tree protection, demolition, concrete forms and pouring, root pruning or exposure, final grading, landscape and irrigation preparation, project close, follow-ups. 6.3 Follow-up: 6.3.1 MONITOR for [-~.Ar.TH & VIGOR: A site's trees should be inspected upon project completion as well as at appropriate intervals to note changes and developing situations wh/ch could require action: foliage crown density, weight distribution, :.:.... and/or breakage; p.ests; diseases; cables and supports; root zone moisture and oxygen; 6.3.2 MONITOR MOISTURF. in ROOT 7.ON~.: In conjunction w/th #Fl, above, if the root zone soil is not moist at a depth of 8" below e,,dsting grade, then consider an application of supplemental watering similar to #P3, above. 6.3.3 FE. RTII.IZER: Upon inspection, after.new growth has been put out by the trees following "' the close' of the project, the qualified arborist inspecting can assess the advisability of making an application of fertilizer. 6.3.4 Nlq. W OWl~.R: The extent of care taken to minimize impact to any trees should be brought to the attention of any new owner/tenant. Mamh 12, 1998. Page #8 of I I. Ray Momeau, Arborist: Certified Arborist's Report tbr Judy Chen: 7359 Rainbow Drive, Cupertino. 7.2 Consultant Qualifications I have acquired my knowledge and skill with trees by completing graduate-level course work as well as by doing ex'tensive field work over a twenty-five year period on the San Francisco peninsula. My experience is strongest in private commercial arboriculture, with some in municipal, utility, and education. My predominantly commercial experience included nine years mrming my own tree service (All Seasons Tree Care) and two years as foreman for the M.F. Blair Tree Expert Company. My city experience was with the City, of' San Marco municipal crew (7 years), mostly as foreman. Besides tree inventories/analyses, my professional practice as a certified arborist has recently engaged me (immediately prior nine years), and current, ly involves me, with consultations regarding all phases of tree care, including appraisals, evaluations, pest control, and training seminars. My academic background was originally in Liberal 'Arts, with later graduate-level work in Horticulture, fin.ally in legal studies concluding with a J.D. I at-tend continuing education seminars and conferences as one aid to keep my skills current. This includes American .:;.....'-... Society of Consulting Axbodsts presentations: "Tree Preservation Advanced Workshop", June 1995; "Hazard Tree ,: i '":" Assessment Advanced Workshop", June 1995; and "Advanced Appraisal/Vab_u~tion", May.1995. Most recently was ;' :!"":':' the ISA "Bgdy Language of Trees", October 1996; "The Science of Tree Preservation", April 1997; and the NCTC "Turf and Landscape Expo", February 1998.' I am. active in professional organizations, including the California Arbodsts' Association, the American Society of Consulting Arborists, the International Society of Arbodculmre, and the California Association of Pest Control Advisors. I have maintained my Western Chapter ISA Certified Agoorist status since passing the examination when it was first administered in 1984. 7.3 Background Facts This report is specific to this unique site, these individual trees, and this particular situation. Although some of the principles herein discussed might appear to be applicable to another site, tree, or situation, it is not possible to effectively carry any of these ideas across to a different scenario. Uncatagodcally, further investigation of the different scene is required. ~. '"': This report is not written, offered, or intended as a legal opinion. Any and all references to c~rdinances, statutes, laws, legal words of art, and the province of jurisprudence are secondary to this work. Unequivocally, before they are to be interpreted or applied, any issues of law which might thus be mentioned herein must be researched and addressed by appropriate legal counsel. 7.4 Literature/Authorities Bdtton, Denice F. and Gene P. Snyder. December, 1992. "Construction Damage: Correction Begins With. Prevention." Arbor Age. 68-8960 Perez Road, Suite I, Cathedral City, CA 92234. Coate, Barrie D. October, 1983. "Planting Under Old Oak~.' Frernontia. Volume 1 l, Number 3. California Native Plant Society, 909 Twelfth St., Suite 116, Sacramento, .CA 95814. CTLA. 1992. Guide for Plant Apprai~l. (8th. ed.) Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, 1250 I Street, .. NV/, Suite 504, Washington, DC 20005. March 12, 1998. Page #10 ofl 1. Ray Momeau, Arboris:: Certified Arborist's Report t'or Judy Chen] 7359 R..~inbow Drive. Cupertino. Dreistadt, Steve' H. 19,94. Pests ot'Lmndsc,~e Trees and Shrubs..An [nte~'ated Pest .M~n~ement Guide. U.C Division of A~culture and Natural Resources; Publication ~3359..-~xiR Publications, University, of Calif'omia, 6701 San Pablo Avenue, Oakland, CA 94608-1239. Hagen. Bruce W., Barrie D. Coate, and Keith Oldham. 1991 Compatible Plants Under and Around Oaks. California Oak Foundation, 909 Tweli~h St., Ste. 125, Sacramento, CA 95814. Harris, R.W. 1992. Arboriculrare: integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs, and vines. (2nd. ed.) Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ' 07632. I.S.A. 1995. Tree-Pruning Cmidelines. International Society of Arboriculture. P.O. Box GG, Savoy, IL 61874- 9902: Koehler, C. S. and R. H. Hunt, D. FroeNich, and J. Geiger. 1988. Protecting Trees when Building on Forested Land. Leaflet #21348. Cooperative Extension, UC, DANR, Berkeley, CA 94720. Marx, Donald. May, 1995. "Roots and Mycorrhizae". Tree C, re i'ndustrv. National Arborist Association, P. O. ::.-,..., Box 1094, Amherst, NJ. 03031-1094. ,:.:. -.:-. Matheny, Nelda P. and James R. Clark. 1994. ~ Photogrlphic Cruide to the Ev, luation of Hsd, rd Trees in Urban Areas. (2nd. edition) International Society of'Arboriculture, P. O. Box GG, Savoy, IL 61874. MclVfinn, Howard E. and Evelyn Maino. 1974. ~m Illustrated M,n,,,l ofPaci~c Co,~t Trees. University of' California Press, Berkeley, California. National Arborist Association. Revised 1970. "Pruning Standards for Shade Trees." St,ndards. N.A.A. McLean, VA 22101. Schoenweiss, Donald F. July 1982. "Prevention and Treatment of'Construction Dam~e to Shade Trees." loumal of'Arboriculture. Volume 8; Number 7. International Society of'Arboriculture. Urbana, IL. Shigo, Alex L. 1986. ~. New Tree Biology: Facts. Photos. and Philosophies on trees snd their problems snd proper care. Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham, NH 03824. .~ :~i- ' Shigo, Alex L. 1986. ~ New Tree Riology 13iction~Br: Facts. Photos. ~nd Philosophies on trees und their problems and pr0~er e~re. Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham, NH 03824. Sunset. 1995. Sun.mt New Western Garden Book. Lane Publishing Compan.v, Menlo Park, CA 94025. U.S.D.A. 1949. Trees: The Y~oook of'Agricult~,ee_ 1949. Superintendent of'Documents, U S Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20025. Watson, Gary. December, 1985. "Root System Care." Arborist News. Volume 2; Number 6. International Society ofArboriculture. Urbana, IL. W'flleke, Donald C. April, 1992. "What Every Builder Should Know." Western Chapter News. Volume 18; Number 4. International Society of Arboriculture, Western Chapter, P.O. Box 255155, Sacramento, CA 95865. .~. Res_~pectfillly submitted, ,, : ISA Certified Arbofist #WC-132. March 12, 1998. P~e #I I of 11. Certified Arborist's Site Meeting Meeting Summary Ray Morneau, Arborist 650.964.7664 Site: Seven Unit Townhous¢, 7359 Rainbow Dr, Cupertino. Owner & Contact: Ms. ~ludy Chcn. Design Stage Meeting Date: 6.25.99 Inspector/Consultant: Ray Momcau Also Present: Judy Chen (Owner) Reference Arborist's Rpt = 3-12-98. Reference Drawings = Metro Design Group, dated 9-11-98. Recap Site Meeting 19" Deodsr Cedsr (Tree #1) 1. Thc tree/building conflicts here do not favor this cedar tree. a. This tree occupies a little more space than indicated. Thc drawings show the limbs extending less than 6 feet from thc center of thc trunk, and an unrealistically small trunk diameter, too. b. Sheets A-l, A-7, & A-8 show the building wall within 11 feet of the center of the mink and stamped concrete patio over about 25% of the root zone. c. Sheet A-6 shows a roof overhang of 2 feet. d. Sheet A-6 also shows the height of the comer of the roof/eaves by this tree to be at 18 feet above grade, This will necessitate pruning off all competing branches below this height. 2. When d~v¢loping property, it is cost effective to r~tain only tr~¢s which ~an b~ an asset to thc ",i ~'~. .:.: property aider completion of the project. 3. The first step is to establish the tree protection zone, the area within which no construction impacts may occur. The tree protection zone for this 19-inch diameter deodar cedar tree should be established no closer than 14 feet from the trunk. This is impossible since the build/rig itself will encroach w/thin that area~ Further, more room is needed both to accommodate the overbuild necessary beyond the actual building footprint and to allow workmen room for scaffolding and working on the exterior of the structure. 4. This tree would not likely survive more than a couple years after completion of the project. Recommendations-- Additional Comments 1. I have compiled a list of suggested trees to consider for the planting palate for this site. 2. My list of qualified tree workers is also attached. Form ad~pt~i by l~y Momm~ Arbori~t (650.964.7664) from Mattamy & Clark Trees and De~mt (1998) RU~-05-~ 08=~5 R~ 585~[24~6 4087~58828+ P.02 Check these suggestions with $~et W~te~ Gerden Book and/or East Bay MUD*s Water. con~erving Plants & I, and$capes for the Bay Area. Also, check with your plant designer/landscape architect. G~neral: TREES: Acerpalmatum Maple, Japanese ~tlnut cordata Alder, Italian Brachychiton ac~rJfolius Flame Tree, Australian CeltJs stnensis Hackberry, Chinese Crataegu~ specJts Hawthornes (many available) l(,oelreuteria biplnnata Chinese Flame Tree Punica granatum Pome~'anite Qu~rcus eocclne, a Oak, Scarlet :... Sapturn sebtferum Chinese Tallow Tree ..,.;~:~: .. gve~r~en ~lgontsfl~uosa Pcppermin! Tree Brachychitonpopulneu~ Bottle Tree Eriobotrya deflexa Loquat, Bror~ ' l, auru~ nobliis 'Saram~' Laurel, Saratoga '-' Melaleuca species Mclaleuca's (many available) Met~o$idero~ exceln~ New Zealand Christmas Tree Ptn~ th~erslaa~ Pine, 5apanese Black ~ lancee Sumac, African {~e~ ~.~o~jo Oak. Coast Live ~Jsf~ confer~a Brisbane Box Trjst~. Ja [al~.i~ Tristania, Laurel-like f!..--.,. Geuerah LARGE SHRIIBS: · ,~ .' ::. .4rbu~ ~o Strawberry Tree ,~ctosta~lo~ de~o~ Manzanita Berber~s sjc,ecl~ Barberry (several to choose fi'om) C~em:~mele~ $1veci~ Quince Cotone~ter lacte~ Pamey's Cotoneastar Fe~oe zeilowl~m~ Pineapple Guava Ilex zpecie~ Holly (many) Lepto,v~erm~m laevJg~m Tea Tree, Australian Myrlce cal~om~co Myrtle, Pacific Wax Myrsl#e ~'~co~ African Boxwood Myr~m co~va~$ Myrtle, True ~a~t~a~ dome.vtico Heavenly Bamboo R~ ime~,~ol~a Lemonade Berry 8yringa w~dg~rJs Ltla~ ORDINANCE NO. 1833 --' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING CHAPTER 16.28 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ELECTRONIC SECUR/TY GATES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: There is hereby added to the Municipal Code of Cupertino Section 16.28.045, which is to read as follows: 16.28.045. Vehicular eglectronic security gates. Vehicular_e~lectronic security gates -".y bs ¢omids:sO for m~pls fo'";ly, _~tt~chs~ d;vslopmsnio may be approved through a fence exception if the development meets any one of the following conditions: is a mixed-use development, where the parkingfor different uses needs to be separated to assure availability of parking for each use; ifa development includes a below-grade parking structure, where the gates are required to secure the below grade parking; if gates are required for a development to obtain federal or state funding; if the development is secluded; if the electronic gates are needed for security reasons; or if the electronic gates were in existence prior to [effective date of this ordinance]. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of September and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this day of August, 1999,by the following vote: Vote: Members of the City Council Ayes .' Noes:. Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino -- ORDINANCE NO. 1835 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING CHAPTER 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING HERITAGE AND SPECIMEN TREES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 14.18 is hereby amended to read as follows: Page 378-2 14.18.020 Definitions I. "Specimen tree" means any one of the following: Species Measurement Single- Multi- From Natural Trunk Diameter Trunk Diameter/ Grade /Circumference Circumference Native Trees: Oak trees 4.1/2' 10" (31 ") 20" (63") California Buckeye 4-1/2' 10" (31 ") 20" (53") Big Leaf Maple 4-1/2' 12" (38") 25" (79") Non-Native Trees Deodar Cedar 4-1/2' 12" (38") 25" (79") Blue Atlas Cedar 4-1/2' 12" (38") 25" (79'') Page 378-3 14.18.140 Exemptions. This chapter does not apply to the following: D. Removal of any tree in a developed residential single-family, residential duplex, agricultural residential, and residential hillside zoning district, except heritage, specimen or trees planted to comply with Privacy Protection pursuant to Section 19.28 (Single Family Residential Ordinance R-I) except those planted on the affected property owners' lot. Page 378-4 Resolution No. 1835 Page 2 14.18.170 Review of Application. A request for removal of any heritage or specimen tree protected by a condition of approval associated with a zoning, tentative map, use permit, variance and architectural and site approval application may be approved by the Director of Community Development if deemed unsafe or diseased or can cause potential damage to existing or proposed essential structures. The Director of Community Development may also require... INTRODUCBD at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 7th day of September 1999 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this day of ,1999, by the following vote: Vote: Members of the City Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino MINUTES CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - REGULAR MEETING Monday, August 16, 1999 CALL TO ORDER At 8:40 p.m. Chairman Dean called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California. ROLL CALL Redevelopment Agency members present: Chairman Wally Dean, Vice-Chairman John Statton, and Agency members Don Burnett, Michael Chang, and Sandra James..Agenc.y members absent: None. Staff present: Executive Director Don Brown, General Counsel Charles Kilian, Finance Director Carol Atwood, and Secretary Kimberly Smith. .cEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of the special meeting of July 19, 1999. The Agency unanimously approved the minutes of July 19, 1999. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESs - None ADJOURNMENT At 8:43 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to Monday, August 30, at 6 p.m., at the Quinlan Community Center, 10185 North Stelling, to discuss the preliminary design review of the proposed Vallco redevelopment. Kimberly Smith Secretary /