Loading...
Annex 94-09 - 21760 Lomita AvePlease record without fee 12863217 Govt. fiC�de aSq.C,.� 61031)-_-- e. S4 FILE J FOR RECOPD u C�Q AT REOL'EST OF 41 CA! IrORNIA -J LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION �� •:\�'�0��� �C APR � � P� 3� 59 County Government Center, East Wing �� �7t' OFFICIAL =?LCGRDS 70 West Hedding Street t ''�'�C SANTA CLAR l. COUNTY San Jose, California 95110 BRENDA DAViS (408 ) 299-4321 P, E C O R C E R '..: r.:". CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION I, Autumn H. Arias, the Executive Director of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission, issue this Certificate of Completion pursuant to Sections 57200 and 57201 of the Government Code. I hereby certify that I have examined the Resolution for a change in organizationH004i0f2itHA attached hereto and have found this document to be in compliance with Section 56826 of the Government Code authorizing cities within the County of Santa Clara to assume authority over certain changes in government organization. The name of the City is: CUPERTINO The entire City is located in Santa Clara County. The change of organization completed is an ANNEXATION A map and description of the boundaries of the change of organization is appended hereto. The title of this proceeding is: LOMITA 94-09 (uninhabited). The change of organization was ordered subject to the following terms and conditions: NONE The date of adoption of the City Resolution ordering the change of organization is APRIL 3, 1995 Dated:_ 1?) �/ `7 AA-( Autumn H. Arias, Executive Director Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission Attachments: City Resolution Legal Description Map RESOLUTION NO. 9295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO SETTING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXING AREA DESIGNATED "LOMITA 94-09", PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOMITA AVENUE BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND PASADENA AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY 0.30 ACRE, HELLESOE/HOUSER (APN 357-18-001) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a request for annexation of territory designated "Lomita 94-09" from property owners, Bruce Hellesoe and Ann and Charles Houser; and WHEREAS, the property, 0.30+ acre on the west side of Orange Avenue between Dolores Avenue and Alcazar Avenue (APN 314-18-001) is contiguous to the City of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on June 4, 1984, to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 zone; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmental review completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section 56826, the boundaries to be definite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above certification has been paid; and RESOLUTION NO. 9295 WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 56826 the City Council of the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an annexation to the City; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider annexation of the territory designated "Lomita 94-09" at their regular meeting of April 3, 1995. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 6th day of March, 1995 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: Bautista, Burnett, Koppel, Sorensen, Dean NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: /s/ Kimberly Smith City Clerk res o I uti/res929 5. res APPROVED: /s/ Wally Dean Mayor, City of Cupertino UJ ".EXHIBIT A" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO LOMITA 94-09 DECEMBER 1994 All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Begin -ring at the southeast corner of LOT B, BLOCK 9, as shown upon that certain map entitled, "Map of Resubdivision of Subdivision No. 1, Town of Monta Vista", which map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on April 11, 1917 in Volume P of Maps, at Page 24; Thence NORTH, 96.00 feet to the northeast corner of said LOT B, BLOCK 9, said point also being along; the southerly boundary line of Lomita Street as shown upon said map and also being along that certain aimexation to the City of Cupertino entitled, "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02"; Thence WEST, 135.00 feet along the southerly boundary line of Lomita Street and also being along said annexation "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02" to the northwest corner of LOT A, BLOCK 9 as shown upon said, "Map of Resubdivision of Subdivision No. 1, Town of Morita Vista"; Thence SOUTH, 96.00 feet along; the easterly boundary line of Orange Avenue as shown upon said map, also being; along; said annexation "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02" to the southwest corner of said LOT A, BLOCK9; Thence EAST, 135.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.30 acres, more or less. A.P.N. 357-18-001 ]AV ISNV�10 �n O Z 0, ZOF- ( z O Of I �u �I F -i U x wQ Z <>�, 1 W 0 N el O0 O Z 0, ZOF- ( z O Of I �u E--� w �- X : °� -i V)i �4 W wQ Z <>�, ~LLJ ¢oo U cUi rn °' Y O LJ Q- w FJ- w z }+ O_E- o w E-+ 0w L U o m RESOLUTION NO. 9312 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "LOMITA 94-09", APPROXIMATELY 0.32 ACRE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOMITA AVENUE BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND PASADENA AVENUE; HELLESOE/HOUSER (APN 357-18-001) WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.30 acre on the west side of Lomita Avenue (APN 357-18-001) has been filed by property owners Bruce Hellesoe and Ann and Charles House; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 1995, the City Council adopted resolution No. 9295 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Lomita 94-09; and WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the proposal consent to this annexation; and WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting authority for said annexation; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: Resolution No. 9312 1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the Government Code for the annexation of property designated "Lomita 94-09", more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; 2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino: a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.30 acre. b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy of annexing when providing City services. C. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment, and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration. d. The City Council on June 4, 1984, enacted an ordinance prezoning the subject territory to City of Cupertino R1-7.5 zone. e. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special districts. £ That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission. g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions. h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this determination. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. j. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of ownership. k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan. 2 Resolution No. 9312 1. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area. M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under provisions of the Government Code. 3. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 35151 et seq. of the Government Code. 4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give notice of said annexation as prescribed by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of April, 1995 by the following vote: Vote Members Qfhiei " Council AYES: Bautista, Burnett, Koppel, Sorensen, Dean NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: /s/ Kimberly Smith City Clerk resol uti/res9312. doc APPROVED: /s/ Wally Dean Mayor, City of Cupertino 3 "EXHIBIT A" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO LOMITA 94-09 DECEMBER 1994 All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of LOT B, BLOCK 9, as shown upon that certain map entitled, "Map of Resubdivision of Subdivision No. 1, Town of Monta Vista", which map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on April 1 l , 1917 in Volume P of Maps, at Page 24; Thence NORTH, 96.00 feet to the northeast corner of said LOT B, BLOCK 9, said point also being along the southerly boundary line of Lomita Street as shown upon said map and also being along that certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled, "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02"; Thence WEST, 135.00 feet along the southerly boundary line of Lomita Street and also being along said annexation "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02" to the northwest corner of LOT A, BLOCK 9 as shown upon said, "Map of Resubdivision of Subdivision No. 1, Town of Monta Vista"; Thence SOUTH, 96.00 feet along the easterly boundary line of Orange Avenue as shown upon said map, also being along said anriexation "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02" to the southwest corner of said LOT A, BLOCK9; Thence EAST, 135.00 feet to the Point of Beghming. Containing 0.30 acres, more or less. A.P.N. 357-18-001 County of Santa Clara Environmental Resources Agency Building Inspection/Land Development Engineering and Surveying County Government Center, East Wing 70 West Hedding Street, 7th Floor San Jose, California 951 10 Bldg. Inspec. (408) 299-2351 Land Devel. 299-2871 FAX 279-8537 February 17, 1995 Kim Smith, City Clerk City of Cupertino P. O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 The attached map and description dated December, 1994 of territory proposed for annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled LOMITA 94-09 is in accordance with Government Code Section 56826. The boundaries of said territory are definite and certain. The proposal is in compliance with the Local Agency Formation Commission's road annexation policies. oai4iX 006e��, Martin D. Marcott County Surveyor Attachment cc: LAFCO Executive Officer (w/attachment) Board of Supervisors: Michael M. Honda. Blanca Alvarado, Ron Gonzales, James T. Beall Jr., Dianne McKenna County Executive: Richard Wittenberg B-010 "EXHIBIT A" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO LOMITA 94-09 DECEMBER 1994 All that certain real properly situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of LOT B, BLOCK 9, as shown upon that certain map entitled, "Map of Resubdivision of Subdivision No. 1, Town of Monta Vista", which map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on April 11, 1917 in Volume P of Maps, at Page 24; Thence NORTH, 96.00 feet to the northeast corner of said LOT B, BLOCK 9, said point also being along the southerly boundary line of Lomita Street as shown upon said map and also being along that certain annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled, "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02"; Thence WEST, 135.00 feet along the southerly boundary line of Lomita Street and also being along said annexation "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02" to the northwest corner of LOT A, BLOCK 9 as shown upon said, "Map of Resubdivision of Subdivision No. 1, Town of Morita Vista"; Thence SOUTH, 96.00 feet along the easterly boundary line of Orange Avenue as shown upon said map, also being along said annexation "ORANGE AVENUE 90-02" to the southwest corner of said LOT A, BLOCK9; Thence EAST, 135.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.30 acres, more or less. A.P.N. 357-18-001 z 0 F d x w z z d z F x W cn o F O �° a E-. C) Of IE' F -i o LLJ U) � W z�Q ~ ¢o W z N 00 P: I Q O X O) w z z Q O w z (D F- z NQ _ of W J Q U 0 N �I O o O �° z C) Of IE' w� X -i o LLJ U) � W z�Q ~ ¢o C)Wa V) o U C:) >- --I w cnvo CD 0 w IJ- O = w M I- w W U O ~ 0 m Statement of Boundary Change State Board of Equalization Tax Area Services Section 450 N Street, MIC: 59 Sacramento, California 95814 B.O.E File No: County: SANTA CLARA I County #: 43 1 Acreage: 0. 32 Fee: $ 200. Resolution/Ord. No.: 9312 Conducting Authority- CITY OF CUPERTINO LAFCo. Res. No.: _ Short Title: LOMITA 94-09 Effective Date: _14/95 Type of Action: City/District(s) Affected by Action: Affected Territory is legally: The affected territory: Enclosed are the following items required at the time offiling: City Boundary Changes only: 01 Annexation to District 06 Consolidation of TRA's 10 Formation Redevelopment X 02 Annexation to City 07 Detachment from District I 1 Name Change 04 City Incorporation 08 Dissolution of District 12 Reorganization 05 Consolidation of District 09 Formation -District 13 School District Chan e BOE Code N District Type of Change 02 CITY OF CUPERTINO ANNEXATION Inhabited X Developed Number of Areas: X I Uninhabited Undevelo X will be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations as set forth by the terms and conditions as stated in the resolution. Map(s) d Supporting Documents will not be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations. X Fees X Map(s) d Supporting Documents X Legal Description X Assessor parcel number(s) of affected territory X Resolution of Conducting Authority NA County Auditor's Letter of TRA Assignment (consolidated counties) X Certificate of Completion X Map of limiting addresses 2 copies) Vicinity Maps (2 copies) X Alphabetical list of all streets within the affected area to include beginning and ending street numbers Estimated p2gulation is: 3 Board of Equalization will acknowledge receipt of filing to: Name: Maxine Grace, LAFCO Clerk Title: Deputy Clerk of the Board Agency: Santa Clara County LAFCO Street: 70 W. Hedd i ng St., 10th Fir. City and Zip Code: San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone: (408) 299-4321 Autumn H. Arias, Executive Director Dace Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission PT400-TA (10-94) ch amt~ B.O.E. use only April 5, 1995 Maxine Grace Deputy Clerk of the Board/LAFCO Clerk Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission County Administration Building 70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 ANNEXATION - "LOMITA 94-09" City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 94014-3202 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Resolution No. 9312 was adopted on April 3, 1995, for annexation of property to the city of Cupertino. Enclosed are six (6) certified copies of the resolution and the Statement of Boundary Change. Also enclosed are a warrant in the amount of $200 for you to forward to the State Board of Equalization for annexation fees, a check to you for $50 for final filing fees for the annexation, 2 copies of a map of limiting addresses and an alphabetical list of streets within the affected area. This territory will be taxed with others already in the City. Sincerely, v ROBERTA WOLFE DEPUTY CITY CLERK Printed on Recycled Papor B.O.E. F,ili.ng No. CountyofSanta Clara LOCM AgCnCv 1 orniation coninjissi011 COUilly Government Cerner. Gass wing �� = 70 \1'csl Hedding Sireel. 1011, Floor San Jose. California 951 10 (408) 299-2424 (4-08) 295-1613 FAX i\ulumn ,,rias, tissisjanl Excculivc Officer-Q,�• . '/A STATEMENT OF BOUNDARY CHANGE C COUNTY: Santa Clara COUNTY NO: 43 EFFECTIVE DATE: CONDUCTING AUTHORITY: City of Cupertino RESOLUTION N0: 9312 SHORT TITLE: Lomita 94-09 LAFCO RESOLUTION NO: NA TYPE OF ACTION: ( M Annexation ( ) Detachment ( ( ) Formation ) ( ) Dissolution ( Reorganization ( ) ) Incorporation p ( ) Other: Consolidation AFFECTED CITY/b4 a; Cupertino TYPE OF CHANGE: annexation to the CitZ of Cupertino AFFECTED TERRITORY IS LEGALLY: ( ) Inhabited (XX) Uninhabited (X) Developed ( ) ACREAGE: 0.32 acre ESTIMATED POPULATIONC 3 Undeveloped . (City Boundary Changes Only The affected territory will/W�'�9i *tx be taxed for existing bonded tractual obligations indebtedness as set forth i-0 the Resolution; the terms and or con- conditions are: Enc•losed.are the following Items required at the time of filing: X tion Fees $ 200.00 . X Legal Descri �- Resolution of Conducting Authority p X Certificate Completior NA County Auditor's Letter of TRA Assignment X (Consolidated Map(s) S supporting p Documents Counties) FOR CITY BOUNDARY CHANGES ONLY X Map of Limiting Airdresses (2 copies) X Alrhabetice 1 list e` y, X 1 streets i•;:thi;, Vicinity Maps (2 copies) the affected area to include beginning and end street numbers BOARD OF EQUALIZATION WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF FILING TO: Deputy Clerk of the Board/LAFCO Clerk Santa Clara County LAFCO 70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 299-4321 COMMIssloners: Joe Head, N1iCllij(-1 N1. Honda, f Vj)(l1 )c Lave. 'Lu(• Lofgre•n. sig SjjIjCI1CZ qg) �c1�3-432 1 Commission Sccretarn•: (4 AN ORANGE AVE N O S,ni ITN 0 sLZ �. F � O � r %' � W N.O,C4 I% � O to.(n.un W cl) m • \o �A 9 21760 Lomita Avenue \NOR HT 30' II 96.00' -< C/) O y b r -3e En a z z a � 9 .O y z O z ^LTJ n d OX A N D ZZ C) aD �z M (0x O )> I :j 00 N Z �4 S CO -C 0 D —I m0� -3 �'?' �, � --q0 '-C Z o C7 --i m rr 0 cn �M SOD C7 V) Z 'b S D D Q m C tij m o m ' ' cp X -P. M D O—�O �c Z O � O AN ORANGE AVE N O S,ni ITN 0 sLZ �. F � O � r %' � W N.O,C4 I% � O to.(n.un W cl) m • \o �A 9 21760 Lomita Avenue \NOR HT 30' II 96.00' -< C/) O y b r -3e En a z z a � 9 .O y z O z ^LTJ n d OX A N D ZZ C) aD �z M (0x O )> I :j 00 N Z �4 S City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408)252-4505 PETITION for proceedings pursuant to the CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACP OF 1985 The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of Cupertino for approval of a proposed change of organization or reorganization, and stipulate(s) as follows: 1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 560001 Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985). 2. The proposed change of organization is designated as: LOMITA 94-09 and consists of: X annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO detachment from (name City/District) of .30 (number of) acres on the side of Lomita Avenue between Orange Avenue and Pasadena Avenue and (if applicable) _ annexation _ detachment of the same to/from S (n/s/e/w) (Street/Avenue) (Street/Avenue) (Street/Avenue) (name City/District(s)) 3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the territory(ies) in'iluded in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map of said territory(ies), marked Exhibit B, are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein. . 4. The territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited. ("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited. 5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence is not of the affected city and district(s). 6. The reasons(s) for the proposed Annexation (annexation, . detachment, reorganization, etc.) is/are: Toprocure rocure City services. Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2- 7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to the following terms and conditions: 8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one): owner(s) of land within the affected territory. registered voter(s) within the affected territory. 9. The undersigned proponent(s) ✓ do own 100% of the territory _ do not proposed for change of organization or reorganization. Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows: CHIEF PETITIONERS (not to exceed three) Signatures of Petitioners (Please print) Assessor's Election name below Street Address Parcel or Precinct Date si ature City/State/Zip No.* No.** i/13o/1A ?0.30 74-0 557-M-0 J ,BR IXE LA 50INU E 5M) h 5, C A gsbsL Phone: (911k) M-3127 11130/ 'y 7 s-ia c4-1 3�7-1S-t0 Phone: (1r�)L- //- 3 10�q a lG� . � 7 /� Gl% l 2. 357 -aa 6t �f/z Phone ) a 6l_-! a ? * - For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner -initiated proposals. ** - For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident -voter initiated proposals. City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408)252-4505 SUPPLEMENTAL SAL APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with any petition to the City for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorganization (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.) PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: LOMITA 94-09 Annexation ) Betatftwt ) to/from City of Cupertino itza) (City or Spec. District) ENVIRONMEN'T'AL STATUS OF PROPOSAL X The City of Cupertino , as Lead Agency for environmental review (Name of City/District) of the project, has already prezoned (prezoned? other approval action?) the territory on June 4, 1984 , and in ccuupliance with CEQA, has: (date) determined that the annexation is categorically provisions of CE)QA pursuant to Cal.Adn.Code Sec. (cite class exemption section). exempt from X completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. ccmpleted a` Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the project and the completed Environmental Information Form required by Planning staff is attached to this application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 252-4505.) Proposal is categorically exempt from provisions of CE)QA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec. because CHARAC`T'ERISTICS OF THE AREA 1. Number of acres .30 2. Number of inhabitants 1 3. Number of registered voters 3 4. Number of dwelling units 1 5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific): Single Family Residential b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract under provisions of the Williamson Act: C. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above parcel(s) from the contract? 6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing requirement for city annexations): If f l b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change.in this zoning if and when the territory is annexed to the City? YES NO ./ If YES, indicate the new zoning which will be sought. 7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being proposed for the territory, if any, and when this development is expected to begin. New single family residential ... 1995 0 8. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership? YES x NO If NO, please explain the reason for non -conformity and provide justification for approving the boundary change as proposed: Suppl. Appl. -2- 9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES NO_X If YES, answer the following questions: a. Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? (If more than one island is being created, indicate the acreage of each island.) b. Number of inhabitants? C. Assessed value? d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip? e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island: f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an island? YES x NO If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified. 10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in the City or District's urban service area: YES NO_X 11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without conummity sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES NO x If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal? 12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construc- tion of any public improvements to the affected territory be fin- anced by the formation of a special assessment district? YES NO X If YES, describe service(s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner of the district. service/ improvement: Cost: $ /yrr. for Supp. Appl. -3- yrs. $__/yr. for —yrs. 13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal. (Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importation.) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information): Cupertino Elem School District Cupertino Sanitary District Fremont High School District Mid Peninsula Open Space District Foothill Community College Dist 14. Please provide the information requested below: a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexatoirVdetachment/reor- ganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by property -owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or print names, addresses, etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and, if 100% property -owner consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be added prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained. Assessed Signature Street Address/ Parcel Value of Date (Print name below) City/State/Zip Tel. No. No. Land See petition's .3")7isj (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.) * "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to be sham as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency owning land." Government Code Section 56048. Supp. Appl. -4- 15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Director of ComYmnity Developnent I s Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district): Street Address Name City/State/Zip (1) (2) (3) 16. I hereby certify that all LAFOO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate. Bert Viskovich �---_ 10300 Torre Avenue =(Signat) complete- Cupertino, CA 95014 (Address) (Date) NOTE:j It A a general LAFOD filing requirement that a copy of this. application be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential developrent of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to submit this information -to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met. t CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal) I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by this application and that the ;3 (number) signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City will make determinations on this proposal without notico,or hearing. Dater cr ity Clerk (Seal) City of Cupertino b. Owners of land within the proposed annexationfdetachment/reor- ganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number and assessed land valuation below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be held for less-than-100%-c*nsent applications. Street Address Street Address Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet & attach.) C. FOR NOT -100% CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters residing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/re- organization if different from the landowners shown in 14a. and 14b. above. Street Address Street Address Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.) Supp. Appl. -5- C1Ly of Copei-I ino Nl-:cn•I' I Vh; DF,(:I,AItA'I' 1oN- May 21, 11-);1/1 A:; Itr'ov i do d by I lw liliv i ronmenl a l 11:;:;c :;:,nu nl Provodiffe , arlolt t ed by the C11%, Council of 1111-' City of Cuperl ino on March 71, 1071, an amvnclrrl, thin following divsvribed 11rojvrl was }minted a Nvgat ivp I)rrlrtral ion by the Elly Council of I he Ci Ly of Culiet-I ino on Play 21 , 191)11. I'rr,jc.c•l Dc:;rripl ion and I,oral.ion AI'I'I irat inti 4 -1 -A -81t n1,111 Iran) : Cily rel Culwrl ino ((11x1 Pionla Vi:;l;r nrc; I,or:tC i on : Cr nc t'a l I v hounded by Cramuln Avenuc [,I the 11111-1.11, Imperial Avcune to [It(, eaa;l., MrC l c I Ian Road Io the soul It and by the wr.r;l cit I y honn(1:11-y of l he Ill nrkhorry I'.1 rut (;o I f Cot r:;c Io I he w(,:;1 . D i' vret ionaryArl Ion kr clot :;l : I'1-( xrnlc and rr•y.nun apprOKIMalVly 97 acres within the Old Munn Vina al-vn to Itl-)1 (ItrAclrnt inl SingIv.f;lmilv), PI -7.5 (Rvnld6nl i.al Singlv-fannlly), I',(Plnnnvd DevvIcipmcnnl. wiLh a Rvmidvnl ial 4.4-12 clwP1I% units Per mross arrv), P (PIonnpd DvvvIol,mpnl with a ItP X11-111 i;11 11.4-7.7 dwvl I inti• ""Am 11pr gross arra), I' (Planned Devololnn(-111 wills I,i)"Itl In(1u:;11-1;11 and 14.!;ldcul ial), P (Planned Itr vc 11111111(111 with Agi-IrolIlire/ItccI-t,;)1 lonal), and 110 (1'1(111 i r• Building) -r.on i lit; (l f :;l r i m s. 1 i (lnmalc i nf, L'o Iy 'I'll(, City Council grant -H a Nvgnl ivv Wr l arat ion :; fnc•(, (lit, 111-0 jcrl I:; con:: i.,;l cnl with the Uncral Ilan and ha.s no signil Want vnvironirivnLal Imparts. ,I;unc . II . S i tilt I'IannInl, 1)irrrlor This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on May 22, 19811. • eputy City Clerk Initial Study City of Cupertino Environmental Assessment Procedures E. A. File Number(s) 4 -EA -84 Application File Number(S) 1-7.-84 Date February 27, 1984 The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, requires public agencies to evaluate public and private projects to determine their paten-L-ial impact on the environment. This worksheet is intended to provide guidance for both you, the applicant, and City officials in assessing a proposed project to determine whether it may or may not have a significant impact on the environment. If, based upon the information provided below, the City makes a determination that your project may have a significant impact on the environment, you will be required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report as provided by State law and the City of Cupertino's Environmental Assessment requirements. Detailed information regarding the environmental assessment procedure is avail- able from the Director of Planning and Development. Fart I Information to be completed by the Applicant Project Type (Pre)Zoning I n l Tentative Map Other Use Permit C- Variance 01-cl MonLa VisLa Are,,i }{enera y )ounc eL y rani, a venue to the n(,r Imperial Location Avenue to the east, McClellan Road to the sc th and by the westerly boundary of the E.Iackberry Fnrm Golt nurseo ie wc� s . Applicant City of. Cupertino Address of Applicant 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone (408) 252-4505 General Description of Project Prezone and rezone the above areas to zoning districts consistent with the General Plan. The ro c,,,r. site contains approximately 97 acres. Rev. 7/8/80 -1- Description of Project (cont'd.) Specific Details of the Project 1. Size of Site Nin 2. Intensity of Development (a) If residential: (1) Number of units per gross acre (2) Residential Unit Schedule: Unit type 111 Unit type #2 Unit type 113 Unit type 114 Unit type 115 (3) Percentage in area of building coverage Percentage in area of recreational open space (4) Parking required Parkin g proposed (b) If commercial, industrial, or institutional: (1) Building square footage (2) Percentage of building coverage of site (3) Estimate of maximum number of employees per shift_ (4) Parking required Parking proposed -2- Questions Related to Potential Impact of Project A. Social/Cultural Impacts: (1) Will the proposed project result in the dis- placement of people? (2) Will the project alter the employment base of the community? (3) Will the project alter the housing needs of the community? (4) Does the proposed project affect a h:istoricai or archaelogical site? B. Physical Impacts: (1) Will the project result in a change of a natural body of water, vegetative cover, or land form? (2) Will the project result in a change in a scenic view or vista from existing residential area or public lands or roads? (3) Will the project change the development pattern, scale or character of general area of project? (4) Will the construction and/or operation of the project result in significant amount of solid waste, litter, dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the vicinity? (5) Will the project result in a change in stream or ground water quality or quantity or altera- tion of existing drainage patterns? (6) Will the project substantially change existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity? (7) Is the project site on filled land or on slope of 10% or greater? (8) Does the project involve the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammable or explosive? (9) Is the project a phase of an existing or future larger project or series of projects? -3- Yes Mavbe No X X X X (Note 1) (Pac,e 4) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Description of the Environmental Settin Provide the following information on a separate attachment: (1) Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of structures. A plot plan may be required for the description. (2) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commer- cial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of devel- opment (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor- mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information pre- sented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date (Signature) For 6_UPe-g'Ptia (1) The project site is comprised of existing urban development including; n acre golf course and picnic ground recreation complex. The entire area has general historic value. A few structures may have greater historicn.l value as separate entities. The rc•cre,'1tinn complex is located in the 1.00-yea17 event flood plan for Stevens Creek. (2) The Project area is bordered by the Old Monta Vista Commercial District to the north, by the West Valley Industri.a.l Parlc to the east and by single-family residential neighborhoods to the south and west. -4- Part 11 Information to be completed by City Officials. A. Primary General Plan Considerations: (1) Is the project in violation of the City of Cupertino's adopted General Plan? (2) Will the project burden public utilities and services? (a) Fire and police services (b) Parks and recreation system (c) Schools (d) Water system (e) Sewer system (f) Storm system (g) Solid waste (3) Is the project side outside of the Urban Ser- vice Area of the City as defined by Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission? B. Social/Cultural Impacts: (1) Will the proposed project result in the dis- placement of people? (2) Will the project alter the employment base of the community? (3) Will the project alter the housing needs of the community? (4) Does the proposed project affect a histori- cal or archaelogical site? (5) Will the proposed project eliminate an existing recreational use at the project site? (6) Does the proposed project decrease public access to any public body of water or recrea- tional area? (7) Will the proposed project alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yes Mavbe No X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X (8) Will the project result in: (a) The disturbance of a natural or man-made feature in the project area which is unique? (b) The obstruction of a -scenic vista open to the public? C. Physical Impacts: (1) Will the proposed project result in the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? (2) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical feature? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soil, either on or off the site? (3) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Substantial. air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? (4) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (b) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (c) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dieeolved oxygen or turbidity? Yes Mavbe No X X X X X X X X X X X X X X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X (e) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X (f) Reduction'of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? (g) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? (h) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? (6) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Increase in existing noise levels? (b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (7) Does the proposed project significantly affect the potential use extraction or conservation of a scarce natural resource such as agricultural land, a mineral deposit, or woodland? X X X X X X Yes Mavbe LNo (d) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? X (e) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation? X (f) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X (g) Exposure of people or property to water- related hazards such as flooding or tidal wave. X (�) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X (c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X (e) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X (f) Reduction'of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? (g) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? (h) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? (6) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Increase in existing noise levels? (b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (7) Does the proposed project significantly affect the potential use extraction or conservation of a scarce natural resource such as agricultural land, a mineral deposit, or woodland? X X X X X X (8) Will the proposed project involve the use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials? (9) Will the proposed project result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or -require the development of new sources of energy? (10) Will the proposed prcjeL;t result in: (a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? (11) Mandatory Findings of Significance: (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (a short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 10 - Yes Mavbe No 94 X X X X X X X X X (c) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) (d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Determination: Yes Mavbe No X x (Note: Use additional sheets if necessary.) On the basis of this initial evaluation, the Environmental Review Committee finds: That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and therefore recommends the GRANTING OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. F7 That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. It is recommended that A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BE PREPARED. �I That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date X ` ' v -9- an, Environmental Review Committee For