Annex 98-01 - Judy Ave (3 properties: 10052 Judy, 10038 Judy and 19030 Stevens Creek) Resos 98-077, 98-106Please record without fee
(Govt. Code Sec. 6103)
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
CALIFORNIA
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION
County Government Center, East Wing
70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
(408)299-4321
ENDORSEU
Doc#: 14224570
6/09/1998 8:27 AM
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
I, Autumn H. Arias, Executive Director of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation
Commission, issue this Certificate of Completion pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200
and 57201.
I hereby certify that I have examined the Resolution for a reorganization attached hereto and have
found this document to be in compliance with Government Code Section 56826 authorizing cities
within the County of Santa Clara to assume authority over certain changes in government
organization.
The name of the City is: Cupertino.
The entire City is located in Santa Clara County.
The change of organization completed is a REORGANIZATION which includes annexation to the
City of Cupertino and detachment from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. A map
and description of the boundaries of the change of organization is appended hereto.
The title of this proceeding is: Judy Avenue 98-01 (uninhabited).
The change of organization was ordered subject to the following terms and conditions: NONE.
The date of adoption of the City Resolution ordering the reorganization is May 4. 1998.
I declare under penalty of perjury in the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated:
Autumn H. Arias, Executive Director:
Santa Clara County Local Agency
Formation Commission
Attachments: City Resolution
Legal Description
Map
RESOLUTION NO. 98-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING
THE REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "JUDY
AVENUE 98-01 ", APPROXIMATELY 0.861 ACRE LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
BETWEEN JUDY AVENUE AND BRET AVENUE; ROBINSON
OIL CO. AND CHENG (APN 375-11-0725 -0139 -014)
WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of
Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.861 acre on the south side of
Stevens Creek Boulevard (APNs 375-11-072, -013, -014) has been filed by property
owners Cheng T. Cheng, Nancy S. Cheng, and Robinson Oil Co.; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 98-077
initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Judy Avenue 98-01; and
WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the
proposal consent to this annexation; and
WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that the
Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an
annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within
the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the
legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the
conducting authority for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and
WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino as follows:
Resolution No. 98-106
Page 2
That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the Government
Code for the annexation of property designated "Judy Avenue 98-01", more
particularly described in Exhibit "A";
2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino:
a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.861
acre.
b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory
with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy
of annexing when providing City services.
The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the
annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment,
and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration.
d. The City Council on May 16, 1983, enacted an ordinance prezoning
the subject territory to City of Cupertino Pre P zone.
Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special
districts.
£ That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the
Local Agency Formation Commission.
g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions.
h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed
annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the
Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the
County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this
determination.
i. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it
would be difficult to provide municipal services.
That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of
ownership.
k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan.
That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the
commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area.
Resolution No. 98-106 Page 3
M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under
provisions of the Government Code.
3. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 35151
et seq. of the Government Code.
4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give
notice of said annexation as prescribed by law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of these reorganization
proceedings the territory annexed will be detached from the Santa Clara County Lighting
Service District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Cupertino this 4h day of May, 1998, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the Lily Council
AYES: Burnett, Dean, James, Statton, Chang
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
/s/ Kimberly Smith
City Clerk
APPROVED:
/s/ Michael Chang
Mayor, City of Cupertino
EXHIBIT A
For Annexation JUDY AVENUE 98-01
Consisting of all of that certain 0.431 acre lot as shown upon the Record of Survey
recorded in Book 512 of Maps, at page 31, Santa Clara county records and all of lots
65 and 67 as shown on that certain Tract Map entitled Tract No. 550 Loree Estates
Unit No. 2 as recorded in Book 22 of Maps, at page 4 Santa Clara County records and
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point at the Northeasterly corner of said 0.431 acre lot, said point
also being on the Southerly line of Stevens Creek Blvd., and the Southerly limits of
incorporation of the City of Cupertino as shown on the Municipal Reorganization for
the Annexation "Stern Ave. 82-1"; thence along said Southerly boundaries
S89°44'00"W 104.96 feet to a point of curvature; thence leaving said Southerly
boundaries and proceeding along the Easterly boundary of Judy Avenue as shown on
the above mentioned Tract Map on a curve to the left with a radius of 20.00 feet, an
internal angle of 90007'00" and a length of 31.46 feet to a point of tangency; thence
continuing along said Easterly boundary of Judy Avenue S00°23'00"E 280.85 feet to
the Southwesterly corner of the aforementioned Lot 67; thence leaving said Easterly
boundary of Judy Avenue and proceeding along the Southerly boundary of said Lot 67
N89°37'00"E 125.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot 67; thence along the
Easterly boundaries of Lots 67 and 65 and the above mentioned 0.431 acre lot
N00°23'00"W, 300.63 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing 0.861 acre.
Revised 3-9-98
Mso(ficelwinword/windos/CHENG EXHIBIT A
o QROF ESS14
E.
Uj No. 2(3597 m
.91 CIVIL ��Q
F CF CAOF
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ENTITLED
JUDY AVENUE 98-01"
0.861 ACRE
— — CUPERTINO CITY LIMITS
1" = 60'
.... .............
.........................
..........................
A V E N U E ............. .............
..........................
...................
90'07'00"
R - 20.00'
280.85' L =31.4
............ .........
X/130.85'
...............
..........
..........
-A OD ..........
to
....................
0 -1 �3
0 O.S. BK. 12 M 1 cli .. , ;%r
.
N/ et
0.4SI 'Ad
AM J76-11' 072
.................
............ .. ...........
60.00'.. . 60.00'...
..........................
............ .............
..........................
150.63, ............ .............
0
z
.. .........
.0 ....
.'.�'pR'606SE'b'AI4NEXAYION'
TO THE 'CITY OF' CUPERTINO .""'.'. Z'LL Z
......
Z-0
:..ENTITLED -STEVENS CREEK .. .. ..
BLVD. 97-17"
LA.w..... w...
P
30' ....... w
B A E T AVE. 30' .............
...
........ ...
.................. .'W ...
.. . . ......
.......... .. ......
............ ......
ElS,o
Vlof ESS19,V
4
.... ......
.............
- PROPOSED ANNEXATION LIMITS
No. -2
0
REVISED 3-9-98
RESOLUTION NO. 98-077
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO SETTING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF
REORGANIZATION OF AREA DESIGNATED "JUDY AVENUE
98-01 ", PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN JUDY AVENUE
AND BRET AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY 0.861 ACRE,
ROBINSON OIL CO. AND CHENG
(APNs 375-11-072, -013, -014)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a
request for annexation of territory designated "Judy Avenue 98-01" from property
owners, Robinson Oil Co., Cheng T. Cheng, and Nancy S. Cheng; and
WHEREAS, the property, 0.861+ acres on the south side of Stevens Creek
Boulevard between Judy Avenue and Bret Avenue (APNs 375-11-013, -014 and -072) is
contiguous to the City of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and
WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and
WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on May 16, 1983, to
City of Cupertino Pre P zone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmental review
completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and
description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section
56826, the boundaries to be definite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance
with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and
WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above
certification has been paid; and
Resolution No. 98-077 Page 2
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 56826 the City Council of
the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an
annexation to the City; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider annexation of the
territory designated "Judy Avenue 98-01" and detachment from the Santa Clara County
Lighting Service District at their regular meeting of May 4, 1998.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 6th day of April, 1998, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Burnett, Dean, James, Statton, Chang
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
/s/ Kimberly Smith
City Clerk
APPROVED:
/s/ Michael Chang
Mayor, City of Cupertino
2
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3249
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of Cupertino for approval of a
proposed change of organization or reorganizations, and stipulate(s) as follows:
1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California
Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese -Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985).
2. The proposed change of organization is designated as:
JUDY AVENUE 98-01
Situs Address: 10038 & 10052 Judy Avenue
and consists of: 19030 Stevens Creek Blvd.
X annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO
X detachment from Santa Clara County Lighting Service Assessment District
of 0.861 acres on the south (n/s/e/w)
side of Stevens Creek Blvd. (Street/Avenue)
between Judy Avenue (Street/Avenue)
and Bret Avenue (Street/Avenue)
and (if applicable) annexation
detachment
of the same to/from
(name City/District(s))
3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the territory(ies) included
in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map of the said territory(ies), marked Exhibit B.
are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein.
4. Territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited.
("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited.
5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence
is not of the affected city and district(s).
6. The reason(s) for the proposed reorganization (annexation, detachment,
reorganization, etc.) is/are: Annex three parcels.
Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2-
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to
the following terms and conditions: N/A
8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one):
X owners) of land within the affected territory.
registered voter(s) within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) X do own 100% of the territory
do not proposed for change of
organization or
reorganization.
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of
Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows:
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please print Street Address
name below) City/State/Zip
Assessor's Election
Parcel'No. * or Precinct No.**
, Z - //-/TAF, Itz
.
x96- 1f l3
* For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner -initiated proposals.
* * For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident -voter initiated proposals.
Cupertino: Annexation Petition -2-
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to
the following terms and conditions: N/A
8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one):
X owner(s) of land within the affected territory.
registered voter(s) within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) X do own 100% of the territory
do not proposed for change of
organization or
reorganization.
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of
Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows:
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please print
name below)
Vobinsah 0" l (...lA
Date: 13W
Date:
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Street Address
City/State/Zip
Assessor's - Election
Parcel No.* or Precinct No.**
g2So pill,awS I2j_ S q3.j
Phone: (W) 2.VC - 5 �31
Phone: ( ) -
3 75 //- 07.,2
* For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner -initiated proposals.
* * For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident -voter initiated proposals.
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3354
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with any petition to the
City for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorganization (multiple
annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.)
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: JUDY AVENUE 98-01
Annexation
to CITY OF CUPERTINO
(City or Spec. District)
Detachment from SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIGHTING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
XX CITY OF CUPERTINO, as Lead Agency for environmental review of the project,
(Name of City/District)
has already Prezoned the territory on May 16, 1983
( prezoned? other approval action?) (date)
and in compliance with CEQA, has:
determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA
pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec.
(cite class exemption section.)
XX completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which
is attached to this application.
completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the
project and the completed Environmental Information Form required by Planning staff is
attached to this application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 777-3308).
Proposal is categorically exempt form provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code
Sec. because
Suppl. Appl. -1-
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA
1. Number of acres 0.861
2. Number of inhabitants 6
3. Number of registered voters 5
4. Number of dwelling units 2
5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific):
Single family dwellings and gas station.
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract under
provisions of the Williamson Act: N/A
c. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above
parcel(s) from the contract?
6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the
affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing requirement for city annexations):
PRE -P
b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is
annexed to the City? YES _ NO X
If yes, indicate the new zoning which will be sought?
7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being proposed for the territory, if
any, and when this development is expected to begin.
Construct townhouses or condiminiums on parcels 375-11-013 and 375-11-014
Development to begin in 1999.
Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership?
YES X NO
If NO, please explain the reason for non -conformity and provide justification for approving
the boundary change as proposed:
Suppl. Appl. -2-
9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of
unincorporated territory? YES NO X
If YES, answer the following questions:
a. Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? (If more than one island
is being created, indicate the acreage of each island.)
b. Number of inhabitants?
c. Assessed value?
d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip?
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island:
f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an island?
YES NO
If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified?
SERVICES
10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in the City or District's
urban service area: YES X NO
11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without
community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant?
YES NO X
If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
Suppl. Appl. -3-
12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construction of any public
improvements to the affected territory be financed by the formation of a special assessment
district? YES NO X
If YES, describe service (s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner
of the district.
Service/improvement:
Cost: $
/yr. for _yrs. $
/yr. for yrs.
13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located
within the area of this proposal. (Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco
Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importation.)
(Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information):
Cupertino Elementary School District
Fremont Union High School District
Foothill Community College District
Cupertino Sanitary District
Mid -Peninsula Open Space District
County Lighting Service Assessment
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
14. Please provide the information requested below:
a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who consent
to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names
and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by
property -owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or print names, addresses,
etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and if 100%
property -owner consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be added
prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained.
Date (Print name below City/State/Zip Tel. No. Parcel No. Value of Land
See
Petition
Cheng T. Cheng
Nancy S. Cheng
Robinson Oil Co.
*See next page
27200 Carrington Cir.
Los Altos Hills, CA 94043
4250 Williams Road
(650)966-1688 375-11-013 $122,775
375-11-014 $130,449
(408)255-9531 375-11-072 $233,813
Suppl. Appl. -4-
* "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized
Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to
be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a
recorded written agreement of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any
public agency owning land." Government Code Section 56048.
15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number,
who are to receive copies of the Director of Community Development's Report and
mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city
or district):
Name
(1)
(2)
(3)
Street Address
City/State/Zip
16. I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made
in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate.
BERT VISKOVICH 10300 TORRE AVENUE
(Print parne of person co pleting this CUPERTINO, CA 95014
app ation
(SignI [ator (bate)
NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this application be filed with
each school district shown on question #13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate
new residential development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to submit this
information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification
that this filing requirement has been met.
Suppl. Appl. -5-
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal)
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the
annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by this application and that the 3 (number)
signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER
CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City will make determinations
on this proposal without notice or hearing. D
Date:—T
City Clerk l &1`'`'`
(Seal)
Name
City of Cupertino
Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who do not
consent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number and assessed
land valuation below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be held for less
than 100% consent applications.
Street Address
City/State/Zip
Name
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
Street Address
City/State/Zip
b. FOR NOT -100% CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters residing in the
territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization if different from the
landowners shown in 14a. and 14b. above.
Name
Street Address
City/State/Zip
Name
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
Suppl. Appl. -6
Street Address
City/State/Zip
JAN -13-98 TUE 16;57
Order Ne.. pDN 375—.1.1—QI5 L
Escrow or loon No... 902.807
RECORDING REOUESTED BY REC. PEE
Santa Clara County Title �mpan. y `;11CI;0
When Recorded Mad To:
Robinson Oil ConTany
4250 Will iarns Road
San ,lose, CA 95129
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO'
Sarre ca,- 1);OVC
LIt14
I'
_ tzY
RECORDED (It T}tE R OF
SANTA CLARA W11mv TMF (Y1WANY
MAR 17 1961 91`10A "
GMME A. VA MIMMIER
SANTA C),ARA C=TY. OFPI AL AMCRD3
SMPF 4 l(
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USC —
CITY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S i�6.s5
_Y fMtlnUlcd on the udnsiderauun nr' valuC J{ :vnrurty cony; p•n,
I2/a OR
pi r•ru;um
CrIV, �, CP tL Vif•{ .1n the eomi�lrrnl,cn a• u�hle Ir.3 ke"5
ul aa(7ner, mmau+ina it tiale a, :ale.
$iyn.wra nl Ccgran ,w Aa ! detNmininp ou a um ?lam.:
Santa C1,jra r'rllmr3• 'I,it1,z ccmpny -
GRANT DEED
POR A VALUABLC CONSIDERATION, receipt of whirl, N hereby acknowledged,
JOHN B. SICLTON and LX= SHZ[=N, his wife
hereby GRANT(S) to
1CBINSON OIL• co' ?Amy, a California Corporation
the real p,operty in the City of Unincorporated Arca. Stare of California, described as
County of Santa Clara
RFi;TNNTNC; at a point on the BRstprly line of Jlx3y P.venue at the Northtaesterly
corner. of Lot 65 as said Avenue and Lot are shown upon that certain Map entitled,
�, "Tract No. 550 T.oree :states Unit No. 2", which Map TOjs Cited for record in the
4Z�tZbffice of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on
January 3, 1949 in Book 22 of M_%ps, at pages 4 and 5; mmning Cher ce bbrth 8911 37'
—� Fast along the Northerly line cf said Lot 65, a distance of 125.00 feet to the
Northeasterly corner thereof; mmning thence Nor+ -h oe' 231 West and parallel
with the said Easterly lane of Judy Aver=- 150.63 feet to a point on the SOULh-
i easterly line of Stevers Creek Road, as said Road is shotrn on. t1TR Map of Tract N..
- --; )5 above referred to; running then-? South 89° 44' West along the said Soot-ely
-3-; line o: Stevens CweeT: Fb3d 104.96 feet; thence on a curve to the left with a
", radius of 20 feet through ar. angle of 90° 07' for a distance of 31.46 feet to a
point on the said Easterly line of Jkttiy Averuc; running titerx r south 00 231 East
alcng the said Easterly line of Judy Avenue 130.85 feet to the point cf beginnung.
L i
r..
Dated
March 12, 1981
STATE OF CALIFL)KNIA 1
COUNtY OF
Santa Clara I
belgr! nu:, INC 0Yblit Ane lar Girl :!SIC,
personally anne're4
John B. Shelton and
TCei 11.0 S1Telt'nn
known to my In bq no person _ w{rpvr nAme_ %A –"n
tuburibcd to the within in.trument and aaknu..I,dwd roar
t be r—, ,00d Inc same.
WITNESS my hood and u{rici.r Wal.
f�
CIRN F3. SIjF.LZOt� � ��`�•i •c
LUCZT2-E SHELION
ounisumplumansumum2umMilaisillunu
C OFFICIAL SEAL
s BECKY ANDRIJASEVICH
rarer mans CAIWMMA
Inmcg-L 0"KII A tM
C*Uwy OF yRfA cue
I
3 Caw Fro. Nar �. 1
5ionaeure f-� / '0t'' ; �-;,/. , (This .,T,.Inr off,u3I noti,iel S-01)
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
D•l
9J7 l�
swru
5ionaeure f-� / '0t'' ; �-;,/. , (This .,T,.Inr off,u3I noti,iel S-01)
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
D•l