Loading...
Annex 99-03 - Greenleaf Drive. Resos 99-197 and 99-239Please record without fee (Govt. Code Sec. 6103) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION County Government Center, East Wing 70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor San Jose, California 95110 (408)299-4321 Doc#: 14966412 9/01/1999 12:03 PM �Nuu�NEu �u�r CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION I, Autumn H. Arias, Executive Director of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission, issue this Certificate of Completion pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200 and 57201. I hereby certify that I have examined the Resolution for a reorganization attached hereto and have found this document to be in compliance with Government Code Section 56825 authorizing cines within the County of Santa Clara to assume authority over certain changes in government organization. I hereby certify that I have examined the Resolution for a reorganization attached hereto and have found this document to be in compliance with Government Code Section 56826 authorizing cities within the County of Santa Clara to assume authority over certain changes in government organization. The name of the City is: Cupertino. The entire City is located in Santa Clara County. The change of organization completed is a REORGANIZATION which includes annexation to the City of Cupertino and detachment from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. A map and description of the boundaries of the change of organization is appended hereto. The title of this proceeding is: Greenleaf Drive 99-03 (uninhabited). The change of organization was ordered subject to the following terms and conditions: NONE. The date of adoption of the City Resolution ordering the reorganization is August 16, 1999. I declare under penalty of perjury in the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: 19 Attachments: City Resolution Legal Description Map T�Autumn H. Arias, Executive irector: Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission C RESOLUTION NO. 99-239 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "GREENLEAF DRIVE 99-03", APPROXIMATELY 0.235 ACRE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GREENLEAF DRIVE BETWEEN BEARDON DRIVE AND STELLING ROAD; WANG (APN 326-09-05) WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.235 acre on the north side of Greenleaf Drive (APN 326-09-05) has been filed by property owner Lisa Lei Wang; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 1999, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-197 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Greenleaf Drive 99-03"; and WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the proposal consent to this annexation; and WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting authority for said annexation; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: 1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the Government Code for the annexation of property designated "Greenleaf Drive 99-03", more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; 2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino: a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.235 acre. Resolution No. 239 Page 2 b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy of annexing when providing City services. C. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment, and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration. d. The City Council on May 17, 1999, enacted an ordinance prezoning the subject territory to City of Cupertino R1-10 zone. e. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special districts. f. That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission. g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions. h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this determination. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of ownership. k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area. M. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under provisions of the Government Code. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 35151 et seq. of the Government Code. 4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give notice of said annexation as prescribed by law. Resolution No. 239 Page 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of these reorganization proceedings the territory annexed will be detached from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 16"' day of August, 1999, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: Burnett, Chang, James, Statton, Dean NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: /s/ Kimberly Smith City Clerk APPROVED: /s/ Wally Dean Mayor, City of Cupertino 3 " EXHIBIT A " ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO GREENLEAF DRIVE 99 - 03 MARCH 1999 All that certain real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, more particularly described as follows; Beginning at the point on the Southeast corner of Lot 13, also the Northerly line of Greenleaf Drive, as shown upon that certain Map entitled, " Tract No. 783, Garden Gate Village Addition", which Map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on September 6, 1950 in Book 30 of Maps, at pages 30, 31, 32 and 33; Thence running with Southerly boundary line of said Lot, West 74.50 feet to a point in the Westerly boundary line of said Lot; Thence running with the Westerly boundary line North 137.26 feet to a point of the Northerly boundary line of said Lot, also the Southerly limits of incorporation of the City of Cupertino; Thence along said City limits and running with said Northerly boundary line N 89 51' 20" E 74.50 feet to a point in the Easterly boundary line of the said Lot; Thence running with the said Easterly boundary line South 137.45 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing : 10,233 square feet, more or less. 0.235 acres, more or less A. P. N.: . 326-09-05 r ��cv 25538 19Te L C)� D � <Tcn 0 �Q NOMJV99 a 0 I 0 p n rn Oz rn I I C W Q ~ � . Qo U �No �� a 0L0 � �` w J o n W O GR ~ `nz Z Q o M c� w�Z ►-� z O con G J U1 w Z Q 1-1 O Z �+ Z w Q} 0)W rn c/� U Q L� �, F- (� W U rn '- Z N '2Ja 03N]�O 0''' � 0 W = n a�- Of u O p of Q U 1 N UX a� JN1��31S a0W cn O w Wm Q > QO ri I O I W w O I ja�' Q�' �re� • Cyd U- Q O �I H1flOS o w a 2!OcoC�m V �cwOO I \~0 (n �i \� , w cc v O a P� ��e� U¢ m? 00 t\ I \,9Z'L� \ 1� S Z l �� l z Hi�JON Li ILi l U z Q Ln C:) w I �1 Co�� O w I I zZ J J o-1 Ln a „0-,0c �� ,OC Q Ln CN I I rG o W v n N N I 0 0 z 0- Z 1= z .- Q I D o O Iz cn X I ma W I o O I I Cl) RESOLUTION NO. 99-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO SETTING DATE I~OR CONSIDERATION OF REORGANIZATION OF AREA DESIGNATED "GREENLEAF DRIVE 99-03", PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GREENLEAF DRIVE BETWEEN BEARDON DRIVE AND STELLING ROAD; APPROXIMATELY 0.235 ACRE, WANG (APN 326-09-05) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a request for annexation of territory designated "Greenleaf Drive 99-03" from property owner, Lisa Lei Wang; and WHEREAS, the property, 0.235+ acre on the north side of Greenleaf Drive between Beardon Drive and Stelling Road (APN 326-09-05) is contiguous to the City of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on May 17, 1999, to City of Cupertino Pre R1-10 zone; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmental review completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section 56826, the boundaries to be definite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above certification has been paid; and WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 56826 the City Council of the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an annexation to the City; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider amlexation of the territory designated "Greenleaf Drive 99-03" and detachment from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District at their regular meeting of August 16, 1999. City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3249 PETITION for proceedings pursuant to the CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985 The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of Cupertino for approval of a proposed change of organization or reorganizations, and stipulate(s) as follows: 1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese -Knox Local Goveriunent Reorganization Act of 1985). 2. The proposed change of organization is designated as: GREENLEAF DR. 99-03 Situs Address: 20819 Greenleaf Dr. and consists o£ X annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO X detachment from Santa Clara County Lighting Service Assessment District of 0.235 acres on the north (n/s/e/w) side of Greenleaf Drive (Street/Avenue) between Beardon Drive (Street/Avenue) and Stelling Road (Street/Avenue) and (if applicable) annexation detachment of the same to/from (name City/District(s)) 3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the territory(ies) included in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map of the said territory(ies), marked Exhibit B, are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein. 4. Territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited. ("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited. 5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence is not of the affected city and district(s). Cupertino: Annexation Petition, page 2 6. The reason(s) for the proposed annexation (annexation, detachment, reorganization, etc.) is/are 7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to the following terms and conditions: 8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one): X owners) of land within the affected territory. registered voter(s) within the affected territory. 9. The undersigned proponent(s) X do own 100% of the territory do not proposed for change of organization or reorganization. Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows: Signatures of Petitioners (Please print name below) L 142A- 1-L 1 SAA kiI 5-1 (Sign here) Date: wia . L� I L (Sign here) Date: CHIEF PETITIONERS (not to exceed three) Street Address Assessor's City/State/Zip Parcel No.* or CIBC LIE 611 o, �t3 LL 6-01OVE # 3,2C--cq--Oo! Phone: Phone: ( ) - Election Precinct No.** * For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner -initiated proposals. ** For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident -voter initiated proposals City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3354 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with any petition to the City for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorganization (multiple annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.) PROPOSAL DESIGNATION: GREENLEAF DR. 99-03 Annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO (City or Spec. District) Detachment from SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL XX CITY OF CUPERTINO, as Lead Agency for environmental review of the project, (Name of City/District) has already prezoned the territory on May 17, 1999 ( prezoned? other approval action?) (date) and in compliance with CEQA, has: determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec. (cite class exemption section.) XX completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. completed a Final EIR for the annexation, a copy of which is attached to this application. City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the project and the completed Environmental Information Form required by Planning staff is attached to this application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 777-3308). Proposal is categorically exempt form provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec. because Suppl. Appl. -1- CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA 1. Number of acres 0.235 2. Number of inhabitants 4 3. Number of registered voters 2 4. Number of dwelling units 1 5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific): Single Family Dwelling. b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract under provisions of the Williamson Act: N/A c. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above parcel(s) from the contract? 6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing requirement for city annexations): PR R1-10. b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is annexed to the City? YES NO X If yes, indicate the new zoning which will be sought? 7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being proposed for the territory, if any , and when this development is expected to begin. Construction of a new single family residence as soon as possible. 8. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership? YES X NO If NO, please explain the reason for non -conformity and provide justification for approving the boundary change as proposed: Suppl. Appl. -2- 9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of unincorporated territory? YES NO X If YES, answer the following questions: a. Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? (If more than one island is being created, indicate the acreage of each island.) b. Number of inhabitants? c. Assessed value? d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip? e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island: f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an island? YES NO If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified? SERVICES 10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization in the City or District's urban service area: YES X NO 11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant? YES NO X If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal? Suppl. Appl. -3- 12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construction of any public improvements to the affected territory be financed by the formation of a special assessment district? YES NO X If YES, describe service (s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner of the district. Service/improvement: Cost: $ /yr. for yrs. $ /yr. for _yrs. 13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located within the area of this proposal. (Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importation.) (Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information): Cupertino Elementary School District Fremont Union High School District Foothill Community College District Cupertino Sanitary District Mid -Peninsula Open Space District County Lighting Service Assessment LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS 14. Please provide the information requested below: a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who consent to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by property -owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or print names, addresses, etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and if 100% property -owner consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be added prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained. Date (Print name below City/State/Zip Tel. No. Parcel No. Value of Land See Petition Lisa Lei Wang 18818 Bellgrove Circle (408) 209-8368 326-09-005 $357,000 Saratoga, CA 95070 *See next page Suppl. Appl. -4- "Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any public agency owning land." Government Code Section 56048. 15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number, who are to receive copies of the Director of Community Development's Report and mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city or district): Street Address Name City/State/Zip (1) Lisa Lei Wang 18818 Bellgrove Circle Saratoga, CA 95070 (2) (3 ) 16. I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate. BERT VISKOVICH (Print n e of person completing this applicon) 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO. CA 95014 E -l-7 l (Date) NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this application be filed with each school district shown on question #13 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate new residential development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to submit this information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification that this filing requirement has been met. Suppl. Appl. -5- CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal) I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by this application and that the f (number) signature$ above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Sectio 6839, the City will make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing. Date: / City Clerk % i (Seal) City of Cupertino a. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who do not consent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number and assessed land valuation below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be held for less Name than 100% consent applications. Street Address City/State/Zip Name (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.) Street Address City/State/Zip b. FOR NOT -100% CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters residing in the territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization if different from the Name landowners shown in 14a. and 14b. above. Street Address City/State/Zip Name (If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.) Suppl. Appl. -6 Street Address City/State/Zip 77 -R -,.-CORDING REQUESTED BY CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY -AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Lisa Lei Wang 18818 Bellgrove Circle Saratoga, California 95070 DOCUMENT: 13691938 111111111111111111111111I BRENDA DAVIS SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDER Recorded at the request of Chicago Title Titles:l / Pages: 2 Fees.... 10.00 Taxes... 473.00 Copies., AMT PAID 483.00 L Escrow No. 771208 -GC Order No. 771208 - LAD SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAXIS $473.00 ❑ unincorporated area FTJ Cityof Cupertino X❑ computed on the full value of the interest or property conveyed, or is ❑ computed on the full value less the value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, and (� FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Bulin Junchu Cao and Bo Hu, Husband and Wife hereby GRANT(S) to Lisa Lei Wang, an Unmarried Woman tl'e following described real property in the City of Cupertino C`cunty of SANTA CLARA , State of California: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE Dated April 28, 1997 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTYOF Santa Clara } SS. On April 28, 1997 before me, Grace Chen a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Bulin Junchu Cao and Bo Hu personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)-lig/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he jshe/they executed the same in War/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hioef/their signsture(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Buli J chu Cao lel, A Bo Hu RDE # 003 5/01/1997 8:00 AM GRACE CHEN Comm. # 1051821 ►n • NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA f Santa Clara County My Comm. Expires June 14,1999 "+ Signature of NotaryFOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOLLOWING LINE: IF NO PARTY SO SHOWN, MAIL AS DIRECTED ABOVE Name Street Address City, State & Zip GD1-08/07/94bk Ilk Page 1 Escrow No. 771208 -GC LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT All that certain Real Property in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows: Lot 13 as shown on that certain Map entitled, "Tract No. 783 Garden Gate Village Addition", which Map was filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California in Book 30 of Maps, at Pages 30 to 33 inclusive. Excepting therefrom the underground water or rights thereto with no rights of surface entry as granted to Calor Construction Co., recorded on August 11, 1950 in Book 2033 of Official Records, Page 130. Also excepting therefrom the underground water or rights thereto with no rights of surface entry, as granted to City of Cupertino, A Municipal Corporation recorded on March 1, 1960 in Book 4713 of Official Records, Page 493. DEE DLEG L-03/09/93-Irc