Annex 00-08 - Alcazar Ave Resos 00-195 and 00-206Please record without fee
(Govt. Code Sec. 6103)
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
CALIFORNIA
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION
County Government Center, East Wing
70 West Hedding Street, 10th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
(408) 299-4321
Doc#: 15378333
9/05/2000 2:56 PM
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
I, Neelima Palacherla, Executive Director of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation
Commission, issue this Certificate of Completion pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200
and 57201.
I hereby certify that I have examined Resolution No. 00-206 for a reorganization attached hereto
and have found this document to be in compliance with Government Code Section 56826
authorizing cities within the County of Santa Clara to assume authority over certain changes in
government organization.
The name of the City is: Cupertino.
The entire City is located in Santa Clara County.
The change of organization completed is a REORGANIZATION which includes annexation to the
City of Cupertino and detachment from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. A map
and description of the boundaries of the change of organization is appended hereto.
The title of this proceeding is: Alcazar Avenue 00-08 (uninhabited).
The change of organization was ordered subject to the following terms and conditions: NONE.
The date of adoption of the City Resolution ordering the reorganization is July 17, 2000.
I declare under penalty of perjury in the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: c
Attachments: City Resolution
Legal Description
Map
Neelirri<a Palacherla, Executive Director
Santa Clara County Local Agency
Formation Commission
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
ENTITLED:
ALCAZAR AVE. 00-08
All that certain real property situated in the County of Santa
Clara, State of California, being all of Lot 20 of Tract No. 300,
MAP OF NOONAN SUBDIVISION - UNIT No. 2, which map was filed for
record on May 6, 1946 in Book 10 of Maps at Page 16, in the
Office of the Recorder of said County, more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot on the
Southerly line of Alcazar Avenue, 50 feet wide, said point being
distant S89058'E 200.24 feet from the Southwesterly corner of the
"Alcazar 86-01" annexation to the City of Cupertino, California.
Thence along the Northerly line of said Lot, also being the
Southerly line of said Alcazar Avenue and the Southerly line of
said annexation, continue S89°58'E 60.00 feet to the North-
easterly corner of said Lot, also being the Northwesterly corner
of the "Alcazar Ave. 97-10" annexation to said City.
Thence along the Easterly line of said Lot, also being the
Westerly line of said "Alcazar Ave. 97-10" annexation, South
132.59 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot, also being
the Southwesterly corner of said "Alcazar Ave. 97-10" annexation.
Thence along the Northerly line of the "Noonan 73-8"
annexation and along the Southerly line of said Lot, N89°58'W
60.00 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said Lot.
Thence leaving said Northerly line of said Noonan annexation
and along the Westerly line of said Lot, North 132.59 feet to the
point of beginning.
Containing 0.183 of an acre, more or less.
APN: 357-19-012
Date: May 10, 2000
Prepared by: E.J. Hahamian, Civil Engineer
14e, �. NA
P'y4,, y
Y
C133 d�
, � 3-31 s
OF
I
L E 6 E N D
B9unciay (rne apex►'Sting Crrinexafion
Bound arc/ ll'ne o�- Proposed ,qr,n ---
exQ on
Uj
1q, I
W -
Q
N
N
P5ALCA-Z-A9 AVE.f'n9 ''AZCA2AR 86-0ve
... _� 5 89�58'F A,�atiat
Z D O.d 6 0.00
2 0 .
1 7 is f"•]
(3CM
L EXP:
d
"/�laona� 73- 00
T n/O
-� EXHIBIT 118"
V° PRoPo5ED ANNEXATION TOTHE
,4 L°j c A ZA i CITY OF CUPERTINO ENITLED:
Cao !ores \,� v %SA LCAZ4R AVE 00"08"
L
u nloor? ar7 H A PN. 357-19- 01Z
N1 c C (e- /I arl SCALA - I" =,50' jai 10, 2000
VICINIT`( MAP
NOT 70 5 CA L F
RESOLUTION 00-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKING
DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
DESIGNATED "ALCAZAR AVENUE 00-08", APPROXIMATELY 0. 183 ACRE LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ALCAZAR AVENUE BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND
IMPERIAL AVENUE; BRUFFY AND EASTMAN (APN 357-19-012)
WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Cupertino in
the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.183+ acre on the south side of
Alcazar Avenue (APN 357-19-012) has been filed by property owner Bill Bruffey and Patricia
Eastman; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 00-195 initiating
proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Alcazar Avenue 00-08"; and
WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the proposal
consent to this annexation; and
WHEREAS, Section 35150.5 of the California Government Code states that the Local
Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an annexation to any City
in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within the urban service area of the
city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body and therefore the City
Council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting authority for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for annexation is
signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council may approve or
disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and
WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino
as follows:
1. That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 35150.5 of the Government Code
for the annexation of property designated "Alcazar Avenue 00-08", more particularly
described in Exhibit "A";
2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino:
a. That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0. 183 acre.
b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory with the
City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy of annexing when
providing City services.
Resolution 00-206
Page 2
C. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the annexation
of said territory has no significant impact on the environment, and previously
approved the granting of a Negative Declaration.
d. The City Council on May 16, 1983, enacted an ordinance prezoning the subject
territory to City of Cupertino Pre R1-7.5 zone.
e. Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special districts.
f. That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the Local
Agency Formation Commission.
g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions.
h. That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed
annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the Commission's
road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the County for actual costs
incurred by the County Surveyor in making this determination.
That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be
difficult to provide municipal services.
j. That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of ownership.
k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan.
That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the commission for
inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area.
in. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under
provisions of the Government Code.
3. That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 35151 et seq.
of the Government Code.
4. That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give notice of
said annexation as prescribed by law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of these reorganization proceedings
the territory annexed will be detached from the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District.
Resolution 00-206
Page 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 17'h day of July, 2000, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
Burnett, Chang, Lowenthal, James
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
Statton
ABSTAIN:
None
ATTEST:
/s/ Kimberly Smith
City Clerk
APPROVED:
/s/ Sandra James
Mayor Pro Tem, City of Cupertino
RESOLUTION NO. 00-195
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
SETTING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF REORGANIZATION OF AREA
DESIGNATED "ALCAZAR AVENUE 00-08", PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF ALCAZAR AVENUE BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND
IMPERIAL AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY 0. 183 ACRE, BRUFFEY AND EASTMAN
(APN 357-19-012)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a request for
annexation of territory designated "Alcazar Avenue 00-08" from property owners, Bill
Bruffey and Patricia Eastman; and
WHEREAS, the property, 0.183+ acre on the south side of Alcazar Avenue
between Orange Avenue and Imperial Avenue (APN 357-19-012) is contiguous to the
City of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and
WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and
WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on May 16, 1983, to
City of Cupertino Pre R1-75 zone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmental review
completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and
description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section
56826, the boundaries to be definite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance
with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and
WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above
certification has been paid; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 56826 the City Council of
the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an
annexation to the City; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider annexation of the
Resolution 00-195
Page 2
territory designated "Alcazar Avenue 00-08" and detachment from the Santa Clara
County Lighting Service District at their regular meeting of July 17, 2000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 19th day of June, 2000, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Burnett, Chang, James, Lowenthal, Statton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
/s/ Kimberly Smith
City Clerk
APPROVED:
/s/ John Statton
Mayor, City of Cupertino
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3249
PETITION
for proceedings pursuant to the
CORTESE-KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985
The undersigned hereby petition(s) the City Council of the City of Cupertino for approval of a
proposed change of organization or reorganizations, and stipulate(s) as follows:
1. This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California
Government Code (commencing with Section 56000, Cortese -Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985).
2. The proposed change of organization is designated as:
ALCAZAR AVE. 00-08
Situs Address 21730 Alcazar Avenue
and consists of:
X annexation to CITY OF CUPERTINO
X detachment from Santa Clara County Lighting Service Assessment District
of 0.183 acres on the south side of
Alcazar Avenue (Street/Avenue)
between Orange Avenue (Street/Avenue)
and Imperial Avenue (Street/Avenue)
and (if applicable) annexation
detachment
of the same to/from
(name City/District(s))
3. A metes and bounds description of the exterior boundaries of the territory(ies) included
in the proposal, marked Exhibit A, and a map of the said territory(ies), marked Exhibit B,
are attached to this petition and by this reference incorporated herein.
4. Territory to be organized/reorganized is: inhabited.
("inhabited" = 12 or more registered voters) X uninhabited.
5. This proposal X is consistent with the Sphere of Influence
is not of the affected city and district(s).
Cupertino: Annexation Petition, page 2
6. The reason(s) for the proposed annexation (amiexation, detachment,
reorganization, etc.) is/are
7. It is desired that the proposed change of organization or reorganization be made subject to
the following terms and conditions:
8. The person(s) signing this petition has/have signed as (check one):
X owner(s) of land within the affected territory.
registered voter(s) within the affected territory.
9. The undersigned proponent(s) X do own 100% of the territory
do not proposed for change of
organization or
reorganization.
Wherefore, petitioner(s) request(s) that proceedings be taken in accordance with the provisions of
Section 56000 et seq. of the Government Code and herewith affix signature(s) as follows:
Signatures
of Petitioners
(Please print
name below)
(Sign here)
Date:
CHIEF PETITIONERS
(not to exceed three)
Street Address
City/State/Zip
Assessor's
Parcel No.* or
10371 811,4 4S& rte( 3573-1q,612-
Phone:
5'7-19.612
Phone: ( - _
P6 - -I c,; d-ynar2 16371 !tel ikA Vis k 4C W ki f -o i �L.
here)
S,
Phone:
Election
Precinct No.**
* For proposals involving uninhabited territory or for landowner -initiated proposals.
** For proposals involving inhabited territory or for resident -voter initiated proposals
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3354
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FOR
MUNICIPAL AND/OR DISTRICT
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY
This supplemental application must be completed in full and submitted with any petition to the
City for a change of organization (annexation or detachment) or reorganization (multiple
annexations and/or detachments) made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Sect. 56000 et seq.)
PROPOSAL DESIGNATION
Annexation
to
ALCAZAR AVE. 00-08
CITY OF CUPERTINO
(City or Spec. District)
Detachment from SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIGHTING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF PROPOSAL
XX CITY OF CUPERTINO, as Lead Agency for environmental review of the project,
(Name of City/District)
has already prezoned the territory on May 16, 1983
( prezoned? other approval action?) (date)
and in compliance with CEQA, has:
determined that the annexation is categorically exempt from provisions of CEQA
pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code Sec. (cite class exemption section.)
XX completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the annexation, a copy of which
is attached to this application.
completed a Final EIR for the amiexation, a copy of which is attached to this application.
City of Cupertino City Council is to be Lead Agency for the environmental review of the
project and the completed Environmental Information Foran required by Planning staff is
attached to this application. (Planning staff phone: (408) 777-3308).
Proposal is categorically exempt form provisions of CEQA pursuant to Cal. Adm. Code
Sec. because
Suppl. Appl. -1-
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AREA
1. Number of acres 0.183
2. Number of inhabitants 3
3. Number of registered voters 2
4. Number of dwelling units 1
5. a. What is the present use of the area (be brief, but specific):
Single Family Dwelling
b. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if any, which are under contract under
provisions of the Williamson Act: N/A
c. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to be taken to release the above
parcel(s) from the contract?
6. a. For city annexations what is the prezoning that has been applied by the city to the
affected area (Note: Prezoning is a filing requirement for city annexations):
Pre R1-7.5
b. Does the applicant intend to propose a change in this zoning if and when the territory is
annexed to the City? YES _ NO X
If yes, indicate the new zoning which will be sought?
7. For City or district annexations, describe the development being proposed for the territory, if
any, and when this development is expected to begin.
New single family dwelling.
8. Do the boundaries of the subject territory conform to lines of assessment and ownership?
YES X NO
If NO, please explain the reason for non -conformity and provide justification for approving
the boundary change as proposed:
Suppl. Appl. -2-
9. Do the boundaries of any proposed city annexation create an island, corridor or strip of
unincorporated territory? YES NO X
If YES, answer the following questions:
a. Number of acres in the island, corridor or strip? (If more than one island
is being created, indicate the acreage of each island.)
b. Number of inhabitants?
c. Assessed value?
d. Land use and zoning in island, corridor or strip?
e. Describe present and proposed sewer and water services in island:
f. Does the proponent request waiver of restriction against creation of an island?
YES NO
If YES, explain why creation of an island is justified?
SERVICES
10. Is the territory proposed for annexation/detaclunent/reorganization in the City or District's
urban service area: YES X NO
11. If new development is proposed on the site, will this new development be permitted without
community sewage discharging into an existing sanitary sewer system and disposal plant?
YES NO X
If YES, what arrangements will be made to provide sewage disposal?
Suppl. Appl. -3-
12. Will the extension of sewerage and/or water services or the construction of any public
improvements to the affected territory be financed by the formation of a special assessment
district? YES NO X
If YES, describe service (s) or improvement(s) and the average cost per resident/landowner
of the district.
Service/improvement:
Cost: $
/yr. for yrs
/yr. for yrs.
13. List all cities, special districts, (including school districts) and County Service Areas located
within the area of this proposal. (Exclude Santa Clara County Water District, San Francisco
Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, County Library Zone, and Water Importation.)
(Refer to County Tax Rate Code Book for this information):
Cupertino Elementary School District Cupertino Sanitary District
Fremont Union High School District Mid -Peninsula Open Space District
Foothill Community College District County Lighting Service Assessment
Central Fire Protection
LANDOWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
14. Please provide the information requested below:
a. Owners of land* within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who consent
to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names
and addresses, with date, below. (Signatures not required if proposal is initiated by
property -owner petition: put "see petition" below and type or print names, addresses,
etc.) Assessor's parcel number, assessed land (not improvements) valuation, and if 100%
property -owner consent has been obtained, certification by City Clerk must be added
prior to consideration. Hearing not required if 100% property owner consent is obtained.
Date (Print name below City/State/Zip
See
Petition
Bill Bruffey 10371 Mira Vista Ave.
Cupertino, CA 95014
Patricia Eastman same as above
*See next page
Tel. No. Parcel No. Value of Land
(408) 252-4663 357-19-012 $99,114
Suppl. Appl. -4-
"Owner of land means any person shown as the owner of land on the last Equalized
Assessment Roll; where such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to
be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment Roll; where land is subject to a
recorded written agreement of sale, any person shown therein as purchaser, and any
public agency owning land." Govermnent Code Section 56048.
15. Print or type the name and address of officers or persons, not to exceed three in number,
who are to receive copies of the Director of Community Development's Report and
mailed Notice of Hearing (in addition to the Clerk/Administrator of each affected city
or district):
Name
(1) Mr. Bill Bruffey
Ms. Patricia Eastman
(2) Mr. & Mrs. Barry Chang
Street Address
City/State/Zip
10371 Mira Vista Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
PO Box 2523
Cupertino, CA 95015-25243
16. I hereby certify that all LAFCO filing requirements will be met and that the statements made
in this application are to the best of my knowledge accurate.
BERT VISKOVICH
(Print name of person completing this
a2oicati
;'.44-7r 1i
(Signa re)
10300 TORRE AVENUE
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
/(I 12�o
(Date
NOTE: It is a general LAFCO filing requirement that a copy of this application be filed with
each school district shown on question 413 of this document if the proposal involves ultimate
new residential development of five acres or more. It is the City's responsibility to submit this
information to the appropriate school district(s) and the signature above is considered verification
that this filing requirement has been met.
Suppl. Appl. -5-
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK (Required for 100% Consent Proposal)
I CERTIFY that I have checked the number of owners of property located within the
annexation/detachment/reorganization proposed by this application and that the G- (number)
signatures above represent all of the owners of property included in this proposal. I FURTHER
CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section 56839, the City will make determinations
on this proposal without notice or hearing. ;
Date:
ity Clerk
(Seal)
City of Cupertino
a. Owners of land within the proposed annexation/detachment/reorganization who do not
consent to this proposal should be listed by name, address, parcel number and assessed
land valuation below. Signatures and dates are not required. Hearing will be held for less
than 100% consent applications.
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/Zip Naive City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
b. FOR NOT -100% CONSENT PROPOSALS, list all registered voters residing in the
territory proposed for annexation/detachment/reorganization if different from the
landowners shown in 14a. and 14b. above.
Street Address Street Address
Name City/State/Zip Name City/State/Zip
(If additional space required, continue list on separate sheet and attach.)
Suppl. Appl. -6
Order No.
Escrow No. 112993 KMK
Loan No.
APN # 357-19-012
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Mr. and Mrs. Bill Bruffey
10371 Mira Vista Road
Cupertino, California 95814
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
Same as above
same as above
M739PAGE0945
1 1 876345
Rocorded at the request of
Commonwealth land Title Insurance Co.
APR 2 7 19938-00
A.M.
A.M
A.M.
LAURIE KANE, Recorder
Santa Clara County, Official Records
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $.- NONE ..................
.................
...... Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR
...... Computed on the consideration or value leu liens or encumbrances
remaining at time of sale.
Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tax — Firm Name
GRANT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
BILL BRUFFEY and PATRICIA EASTMAN, husband and wife, who acquired title as, BILL BRUFFEY,
an unmarried man, and PATRICIA EASTMAN, an unmarried woman
hereby GRANT(S) to
BILL BRUFFEY and PATRICIA EASTMAN, husband and wife, as Jpfell +e1-)Gni"5
the real property in the XXfWM unincorporated area,
County of Santa Clara
S
, State of California, described as
Lot 20, Tract No. 300, filed May 6, 1946 in Book 10 of Maps, at page 16, Santa Clara
County Records.
THIS DEED IS CREATED TO CORRECT THE MARITAL STATUS OF BILL BRUFFEY AND PATRICIA EASTMAN,
GRANTORS HEREIN, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE.
Dated April 16, 1993
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS.
COUNTY OF Santa Clara
On April,,k611�l�-' �1 before me, KATHRYN KELSEY
t
personally appeared
BILL BRUFFEY AND PATRICIA EASTMAN
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is / are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his / her / - u,_,.`W i`��"'
their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her / their signature(s) on the ;;; ::.' I, i
instrument the person (s), or theentity uponbehalfof which the erson s
acted, executed the instrument. L;olary Pubiic - CaMornis
;. v
yante Clara CounLy
WITNESS my hand and official se 141;1 Carnln, Exp. June 2, 1995
Signature KATHRYN KELSEY (Seal)
Form 3212-1 (Rev. 1-1-92) (! F„_ �i 1 r: i is {y 17 A` u'ci"� + J : ✓ �-� Y G
+.r '.i.
I'i•i �;
I �..
\::Yi•
TF07 Pa..61It
1 1 876345
Rocorded at the request of
Commonwealth land Title Insurance Co.
APR 2 7 19938-00
A.M.
A.M
A.M.
LAURIE KANE, Recorder
Santa Clara County, Official Records
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $.- NONE ..................
.................
...... Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR
...... Computed on the consideration or value leu liens or encumbrances
remaining at time of sale.
Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tax — Firm Name
GRANT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
BILL BRUFFEY and PATRICIA EASTMAN, husband and wife, who acquired title as, BILL BRUFFEY,
an unmarried man, and PATRICIA EASTMAN, an unmarried woman
hereby GRANT(S) to
BILL BRUFFEY and PATRICIA EASTMAN, husband and wife, as Jpfell +e1-)Gni"5
the real property in the XXfWM unincorporated area,
County of Santa Clara
S
, State of California, described as
Lot 20, Tract No. 300, filed May 6, 1946 in Book 10 of Maps, at page 16, Santa Clara
County Records.
THIS DEED IS CREATED TO CORRECT THE MARITAL STATUS OF BILL BRUFFEY AND PATRICIA EASTMAN,
GRANTORS HEREIN, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE.
Dated April 16, 1993
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS.
COUNTY OF Santa Clara
On April,,k611�l�-' �1 before me, KATHRYN KELSEY
t
personally appeared
BILL BRUFFEY AND PATRICIA EASTMAN
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is / are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his / her / - u,_,.`W i`��"'
their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her / their signature(s) on the ;;; ::.' I, i
instrument the person (s), or theentity uponbehalfof which the erson s
acted, executed the instrument. L;olary Pubiic - CaMornis
;. v
yante Clara CounLy
WITNESS my hand and official se 141;1 Carnln, Exp. June 2, 1995
Signature KATHRYN KELSEY (Seal)
Form 3212-1 (Rev. 1-1-92) (! F„_ �i 1 r: i is {y 17 A` u'ci"� + J : ✓ �-� Y G
+.r '.i.