CC 08-08-00AGENDA
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
Blackberry Farm Retreat Center
21979 San Fernando Avenue, Cupertino
Tuesday, August 8, 2000
8:00 a.m. - $:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter
not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit
the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP
Civic Center plan
Review fund reserve level policy
Set capital improvement project priorities
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be on Monday, August 21, 2000.
General Fund Reserves
1. Purpose and Definition
2. General Fund Trends
3. Comparative Statistics for California Cities
35,000
30,000
25,0O0
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
General Fund ReservesI
94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
· Reserve
· Policy Level
· Goal Level
Reserve (in thousands)
Fiscal Years
* Reserve
Policy Level
Goal Level
{ Actual I t Projected
94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
15,430 16,382 17,383 32,085 21,574 19,464 16,368 7,058
15,128 15,089 16,562 16,632 17,854 19,501 20,541 21,620
20,150 20,119 22,082 22,176 23,806 26,001 27,388 28,827
Current City Council policy establishes reserves at 75% of annual general fund
operations plus debt service. The current goal for reserves is 100% of this base.
* Net of designated reserves for loans, affordable housing and public access
television ($4,388)
Budgeting A General Fund Reserve
CSMFO Survey Results
February 21, 2000
City/Town Name General % Basis Comments
Fund
Balance
Camarillo Reserve 50-75 Operating expenditures, Policy addressed during budget
plus transfers to support deliberations, mid year and
other fund operations upon major budget amendment
Campbell Reserve 10 Operating revenues Financial or physical emergency
Campbell Reserve 5 Revenues Operating contingency -
unanticipated expense or
shortfall of revenue
Campbell Reserve $2.5 million Economic fluctuations
Campbell Designated Surplus Used for Capital projects
Chico 7.5 Expenditures Budgetary reserve
Coalinga Reserve Six months expenditures Goal disussed during mid year
review.
DMG-Maximus Fed Circular A-87 permits
setting up a "reasonable"
working capital reserve in ISF's.
The Feds allow setting billing
rates for services out of those
type funds to build up a reserve
equal to 60 days (or 1/6th) of the
annual budget without requiring
any credits to the users.
El Cajon Reserve $140,000 Council contingency
El Cajon Reserve 20 Operating budget Within General Fund
El Centro Reserve 10 Annual Expenditures Per financial policy - at
discretion of City Council.
Emeryville Designated 25 Excess revenues Transfer to separate fund for
capital exp, major maintenance
of City facilities, post retirement
health benefits.
Fremont Reserve 12.5 Operating expenditues Maintain reserve in separate
fund.
Healdsburg Reserve Currently there is no policy.
The City is working on a policy.
Hemet Reserve 15 Adopted by resolution a fiscal
policy
Hemet Reserve Excess funds Transfer to equipment
replacement fund.
Imperial Beach Reserve 25 Total Expenditures Emergency Reserve
Lancaster Reserve 10 Per adopted policy
Lancaster Reserve 10 - 20 Varies from year to year
Manhattan Beach Reserve 20 By policy. Set up additional as
needed in proposed budget to
cover revenue loss. Transfer
excess above 20% to CIP fund.
Moorpark Reserve 100 Annual Revenues
07/26/00 1
Budgeting A General Fund Reserve
CSMFO Survey Results
City'own Name t General % Basis Comments
Fund
Balance
Moreno Valley Designated 15 Operating budget Contingencies
following year
Moreno Valley Designated Fixed @ $1,500,000 Operating Deficits
Moreno Valley Designated Operating surplus - Capital Expenditures
leaves unreserved,
undesignated fund
balance of O.
Napa Reserve One-half property tax Emergency
Napa Reserve $1,500,000 Contingency
Palmdale Reserve 5 - 10 Expenditures, net of
interfund transfers in/out
Patterson Reserve 20 Appropriations 1999/00
Pismo Beach Reserve 15 Expenditures $500,000 originally, increased
by $100,000 per year.
Pleasanton Reserve 10 Revenue Per General Plan - for
economic uncertainty.
Pleasanton Reserve One-time money or To be used for capital projects
surplus in excess of
reserve.
Redondo Beach Designated 7.5 Budget
Rolling Hills Estates 30 Revenues Adopted 1999 policy of
$1,500,000 unreserved,
undesignated fund balance.
Rolling Hills Estates Designated Two mo. expenditures Contingencies
San Francisco Reserve 10 General Fund payroll Emergency
Santee Reserve 20 Adopted budget
Saratoga Reserve $2 million Equals 3.5 mo. Operating
expense
Suisun Reserve One time revenues Stabilization Reserve Fund -
separate fund began two years
ago with $275,000.
Sunnyvale Designated 20 Operating expenses Contingency
reserve
Sunnyvale Designated 5 Operating expenses Service level contingency
reserve
Sunnyvale Designated Excess fund balance Non recurring events, i.e. one-
reserve from one-time revenues time capital expenses, not
and excellent economy continuing operations
Sunnyvale Restricted Includes land acquisition, cable
Reserve TV franchise, debt service, etc.
Sunnyvale Restricted Other - floats up and down over
reserve pedod of LT financial plan. As
long as it's positive, fund is
considered healthy.
Thousand Oaks Reserve 15 Next year General Fund Within General Fund
budget
07~6~0 2
Budgeting A General Fund Reserve
CSMFO Survey Results
City/Town Name General % Basis J Comments
Fund
Balance
Tracy Reserve 10 Operating budget Undesignated fund balance
Truckee Reserve 19 Expenditures
Tustin Reserve 15 Expenditures Council stated policy. At year
end transfer excess out or
adjust current budget to stay
within 15%.
TVMWD Reserve Water operations budget Water district. Per policy surplus
revenue reserved at year end.
Vacaville Reserve 15 Operating Revenues Goal 15% - current operating
reserve is 18%
Visalia Reserve 20 Annual operations From year end surplus.
Reviewed annually.
Vista Reserve 8 Budgeted appropriations Set aside funds annually during
budget preparation. Increase
reserve 1% annually until 10%
reached.
Yucca Valley Reserve/De 5 Expenditures
signation
07/26/00 3
While California cities
have lost a considerable
amount of revenue flexi-
bility, they retain a rela-
tively high degree of
overall financial flexibility
with which they can
respond to future fiscal
pressures; In general,
ciries hold ample general
fund reserves. At the end
of fiscal 1997, the median
California city's total
general fund balance
equaled 31.1% of general
fund revenues; 80% of
cities had a general fund
balance in excess of
15.1%.
Available fund bal-
ances - that portion of
total fund balances which
is not encumbered, is rel-
atively liquid, and is actu-
ally available for confin-
Distribution of General Fund Reserves All Cities
<0% 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% >70%
Availal31e Fund Balance as % of Revenues
City Reserves by Population
30.0%-
<:25,000 25,000-99,999 100,000-249,999 >250,000
8 Moody's Out/ook _ A/~v. 9~
gencies - are also significant. At the end of fisc~ 1997, the median city's available fund balance equaled
20.2% of revenues; 80% of cities have an available fund balance in excess of 8.4%.
Larger cities tend to have relatively smaller fund balances when these reserves are expressed on a per-
centage basis. Cities with population over 250,000 (the 10 largest cities in the state), have a median total
fund balance of 13.4% of revenues and a median available fund balance of 7.9% of revenues. To an extent
rhi_~ is appropriate because large cities, with their larger tax bases, generally have less volatile revenues.
Nevertheless, it is norad that the small reserves of some of the state's lzrgest cities are credit concerns of
Moody's.
Cities also retain the ability to reduce expenditures as needed, at least within the limits permitted by
their local political environments. Unlike counties and school districts, cities have few mandated services.
While hard-to-cut services such as police and fire are the largest area of city expenditures, city
with a few exceptions have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to reduce expenditures with hiring
freezes, layoffs, and service reductions. Also, many cities regularly fund capital expenditures with cash,
prodding another source of expenditure flexibility.
Perhaps the most significant evidence of cities' ability to adjust expenditures as needed is that most
emerged from the last recession with their general fired reserves intact. At the end of fiscal 1995, when
many cities were only just beginning to see a recovery in revenues, the median city's general fund balance
was 22.4% of revenues.
Table 1:
Comparative Financial Statistics for California Cities
Fund hal as Fund hal as Fund hal as
% of rev % ofrev % of rev
FY 1995 FY 1996' ::: FY 1997
Cities over 250,000 10
Cities 100,000 to 249,999 45
Cities 25,000 to 99j999 181
Cities under 25,000 234
Rated Cities over 75.000
Alhambra C h a'-a'-a'-a'-a'-a'-~ ~ 19.4%
Anaheim Charter 21.2 %
Bake~'field
iterkelev
BurbanE;
Concord
Corona
Costa Mesa
:., · .
Fresno :' · .' "'' Charter
Fullenon '~' ..' · .':... General Law
Garden Grove ...... General Law
Glendale General Law
Chan~r
Charier
Modesto
Momno ValleY
Oakland
Oceanside
Ontario
22.4% 27.9% 31.1%
14.8% 11.5%.. 13.4%
27.2% 28.0% · ' 33.1%
:25.8% 30.7% :31
15.5% · 29.0% .:" 37.1%
22.9%'~ 30.7%
21.0% 22.2%
26,4%
Avail. fund Ay'aiL fund hal Ava1 fund hal
bal as % of rev as%ofrev as%ofrev
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
14.4% 17.4% 20.2%
9.3% 7.4% 7.9%
18.3% 20.0% 20.2%
13.6% 20.1% 19.1%
11.6% 17.8% 28.1%
10.4% 21.4% 28.0%
6.6% 8.5% 9.7%
18.3% 18.1% 12.3%
12.4% ~ 14.0% 17.1%
25,3% 23.5% .. · 34.8%
24.9% 16.0% ' 13.7%
24.9% ' 30.5% 35.6%
47.8% 50.1% 51.2%
9.0% '11.8% 6.3%
103.9% 103.5% .' '.87.4%
.;:11.3% 10.2% 7.4%
16.3% ":~':. -' 20.5%;:: .:21.
"13.1%
5.8% :.
::;'90.9%: /:~ 105.7%
9.3% :. 7.8% · .. 10.5%
,3.4%
1%' ~:'::' 9.3%
Redding
Riverside
Salinas
San Buenaventura
.San .Diegq.
3.an i-ranctsco
San Jose
San Mateo
Santa Aha
Charter
':. hiM.6% :59.7%
33.6% ;:'- 19.3% .:.:::.;
Santa Mo~ica
87~8%
N'ev '?o° Moody'sOut/ook 11
Five Year Capital Improvements Program
1. Adopted Budget - Fiscal Year 2000/01
2. Additional CIP Requests
3. Proposed Criteria for Project Ranking
Five Year
Capital
Improvements
Program
Fiscal Years 2000-01 to 2004-05
227
Fund
Description
Prior
Approval
Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003.04 2004.05
Not
Funded
9100
420-9108
420-9115
560-9112
420-9116
280-TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
Parks/Trails
Park Renovation Program
Skate Park
Blackberry/McClellan Ranch Master Plan
San Thomas/Saratoga Trail Improvement
Portal Park Expansion
Acquire Fronting Prop. Creekside Park
Stevens Creek Trail Master Plan Study
Union Pacific RR Trail Feasibility
McClellan Ranch Park Immprovement
DeAnza Trail Feasibility
Ongoing 100,000
350,000
50,000 100,000
15,000
150,000
125,000
400,000
2,000,000
2.350,000
3,400,000
200,000
200,000
50,000 915,000 125,000 0 400,000 0 7,950,000
To~l
9200
420-9216
~-~ 560-9105
420-9219
420-9220
420-9221
420-9222
TBA
Buildings
Sen~ice Center Expansion 250,000 160,000
Blackberry Farm Improvements Ongoing 175.000 175,000 175,000 200,000 225,000
Animal Control Facility 500,000
Varian Park Restroom Facility 150,000
Sports Center Building 1,300,000
Library 2,500,000 19,500,000
Community Gymnasium
5,000,000
2,000,000
Total 250,000 4,785,000 19,675,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 7,000,000
9300
420-9315
TBA
TBA
Medians and Overpasses
Torre Avenue Median
Rainbow (De Anza to Stelling)
Stevens Creek Blvd Specific Plan
125,000
700,000
950,000
Total 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 1,650,000
Description
Prior
Fund
Approval
Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003.04 2004-05
Not
Funded
9400
270-9435
270-9443
270-9444
270-9445
270-9446
270-9430
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
Streets
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Measures
Bollinger Rd Bike Facility Improvement
Bubb/McClellan Intersection Modification
Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrade
DeAnza/Stev Creek Crosswalk Enhanc.
Stevens Canyon Road Widening
Foothill BIvd/Voss Signal Replacement
Enhanced Walkway in Unimproved Areas
Foothill Bird Bike Lanes
Imperial Avenue Cul-De-Sac
Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge
McClellan Rd (Orange to Linda Vista)
McClellan RdlStelling to DeAnza
100,000
175,000
1,000,000
150,000
23§,000
50,000
125,000
120~00
250,000
150,000 150,000
75,000
75,000 75,000
75,000
75,000
550,000
310,000
400,000
740,000
2,500,000
1,000,000
Total
Total Capital Improvement Program
1,275,000 931,000 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,000 5,500,000
1,575,000 6,756,000 20,100,000 400,000 675,000 300,000 22,100,000
SUMMARY FIVE YEAR PROGRAM FiVE YEAR
00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 TOTAL
SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES
GF=GENERAL FUND 5,550,000 19,625,000 0 0 0 25,175,00(
RC=BLACKBERRY FARM 275,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 1,050,00(
GT=GAS TAX 931,000 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,000 1,606,00(
El=ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0
PD=PARK DEDICATION 0 0 0 400,000 0 400,00(
SD=STORM DRAIN 0 0 0 0 0 (:
RA=RESERVE ACCOUNT 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 6,756,000 20,100,000 400,000 675,000 300,000 28,231,00(;
SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS
PARKS / TRAILS 915,000 125,000 0 400,000 0 1,440,00(
BUILDINGS 4,785,000 19,675,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 25,060.00C
MEDIANS AND OVERPASSES 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,00C
STREETS 931,000 0 0 0 0 931
STORM DRAIN 0 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,000 675,000
TRAFFIC 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 6,756,000 20,100,000 400,000 675,000 300,000 28,231,000
SUMMARY OF OPERATING MAINTENANCE
OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE 0 92,000 340,000 356,500 413,000
GF=GENERAL FUN D 815,000 125,000
RC=BLACKBERRY FARM 100,000
GT=GAS TAX
El=ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
PD=PARK DEDICATION 400,000
SD=STORM DRAIN
PARKS TOTAL 915,000 125,000 400,000
ACQUIRE PROP. FRONTING CREEKSIDE PARK 2,000,(XX]
PARK RENOVATION PROGRAM 100,000 ,
SKATE PARK 350,000 ,~
PORTAL PARK EXPANSION 400,000
BLACKBERRY I MCCLELLAN RANCH MASTER PLAN 100,000
STEVENS CREEK TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY 150,000 2.350,00(]
SAN THOMAS/SARATOGA CREEK TRAIL IMPROVE. 15,000 125,000
UNION PACIFIC RR TRAIL FEASIBILITY&IMPLEM. 200,000 3,200,0(X]
MCCLELLAN RANCH PARK IMPROVEMENTS 200,00(]
LAND ACQUISITIONS - PRIVATE LANDS TBD
TOTAL 915,(xx) 12s,000 ,mo,mo ?.7so,oo~
OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE 67,000 73,000 77,500 122,00~
ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FRONTING
CREEKSIDE PARK SITE
I,r~.ct cost 2.ooo.oo~
PARK RENOVATION PROGRAM
,K)LLYMAN AND WN. SON PARKS
Ih'oJed Cost 100.000 GF
SKATE PARK
MMMenlnce eom 30,0(]0 OM 32,000 OM 34.000 OM 36.000 OM
Operating Cost 37,000 OM 39,000 OM 41,000 OM 43.000 OM
PORTAL PARK EXPANSION
Maintenance cost 40,000 OM
BLACKBERRY FARM I MCCLELLAN RANCH
MASTER PLAN
STEVENS CREEK TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
Project Cost 2,350,000
Maintenance Cost
FEASIBILITY STUDY. OAK VALLEY (CEQA) 150,000 GE*
SAN THOMAS AQUINO I SARATOGA CREEK TRAIL
BICYCLE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Pt~se I: Troll from T&ntsu to I~umfloe Exl)mssw~y vb B~mh~. ( ~Jlly funded by
Grant - S350,000)
Design Cost 15,000 GF
Project Cost t25,000 GF
Maintenance Cost 2,000 OM 2,500 OM 3,000 OM
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TRAIL FEASIBILITY &
IMPLEMENTATION
ConMnlct ~ ,long mdMlng Union Pmc~c R~llwly trill tmclmge m
Project Cost 3,200,0(X
FEASIBILITY STUDY 200,000 GF
MCCLELLAN RANCH PARK IMPROVEMENTS
LAND ACQUISITION - PRIVATE LAND8
BLE$CH ~.~ ACRES
~N ~PACE
~~~~ TBD
GF'GENERAL FUND 4,610,000 19,500,000
RC'BLACK:BERRY FARM 175,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 225,000
CT'GAS TAX
El'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
PD'PARK DEDICATION
SD-STORM DRAIN
RA.,RESERVE ACCOUNT
BUILDING8 TOTAL 4,785,000 19,675,000 175,000 200,000 225.000
SERVICE CENTER EXPANSION 1~0,000
BLACKBERRY FARM REPAIRS ! 75.000 175,000 175,000 200,000 225,000
ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY 500,000
VARIAN PARK RESTROOM FACILITY 150,000
$PORT$ CENTER BUILDING 1,300,000
COMMUNITY GYMNASIUM 2.000,00~
TEEN CENTER TBD
LIBRARY 2,500,500 19,500,000 5.000,000
TOTAL 4,785,000 1g,675,500 175,000 200,000 225,000
OM-OPERATING MAINTENANCE 15,500 256,000 267,000 278,000
SERVICE CENTER EXPANSION
PII~I~ ~ 1~0,000 OF
BLACKBERRY FARM REPAIRS 9105
Project CoM 175,000 RC 175,000 RC 175,000 RC 200,000 RC 225,000 RC
'ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITY
· ,~-.~dlne e dudy md ood~mcll~ e fmdmy (~dimeied SS 2 lo S~.~
C#y's Sham 500,000 GF
I/ARIAN PARK RESTROOM FACILITY
To be con~ileM wllh ollw laurel ol' .Mdle ~ize and .le. i ~slnx~m
Project Cost 150,000 GF
Malstenance Cost 15,0(O OM 16,000 OM 17,000 OM 18,000 OM
SPORT8 CENTER BUILDING
PTO~ Cost 1.300,000 GF
COMMUNITY GYMNASIUM
Maintenance Cost
operating cod
TEEN CENTER
TBD
LIBRARY
e mint $~2 m~lim by 71~.
AJ'chltect 2,5(X),000 GF
Constn~.fflon ~9,500.000 GF
Maintenance Cod 240,(X)0 OM 250,000 OM 260,000 OM
Renovstimt of E~lstlng Ubrar~ Building $.000,000
SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES
GF'GENERAL FUND ~ 25,000
RC=BLACKBERRY FARM
CT-GAS TAX
El-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
PD-PARK DEDICATION
SD-STORM DRAIN
RA-RESERVE ACCOUNT
SC-STEVENS CREEK FUND
MEDIANS AND OVERPASSES TOTAL 125,000
RAINBOW (DE ANZA TO STELUNG)
STEVENS CREEK BLVD. SPECIFIC PLAN 950,00~
TORRE AVENUE MEDIAN 125,000
TOTAL 125,000 1,650,00~
OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE 10,000 11,000 12,0~0 13,000
I~MNBOW (DE ANZA TO 8TELLING)
Immm~:tw~ ~ RMM~.
ProJed Cost 7~,~
5TEVEN~ CREEK BLVD SPECIFIC
~~.
TORRE AVENUE MED~
~ c~ ~,~
Ma~~ 10,~ OM 11,~ OM 12,~ OM 13,~ OM
GF"GENERAL FUND
RC"BLACKBERRY FARM
CT"GAS TAX 931,000 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,00~
El"ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
PD"PARK DEDICATION
SD"STORM DRAIN
RA-RESERVE ACCOUNT
STREETS TOTAL 931,000 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,000
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES 150,000 150,000 150,000 550,000
BOLLINGER RD. BICYCLE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 236,000
BUBB/MCCLELLAN INTERSECTION MODIFICATION 50,000
TRAFFIC SIGNAL HARDWARE UPGRADE 125,000
DEANZAOSTEVENS CREEK CROSSWALK ENHANC. 120,000
FOOTHILL BLVDJVOSS SIGNAL REPLACEMENT 75,000
ENHANCED WALKWAYS IN UNIMPROVED AREAS 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,00~
FOOTHILL BLVD. BIKE LANES 310,00~
IMPERIAL AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC 400,00~
MARY AVENUE BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE 740,00C
MCCLELLAN RD.(ORANGE TO UNDA VISTA) 2,500,00~
MCCLELLAN ROAD I STELLING TO DEANZA 1,000.00~
STEVENS CANYON ROAD WIDENING 250,000
TOTAL
931,000 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,000 5,500,0(X
SUMMARY OF OPERATINGMAINTENANCE!iii~iiii::ii:~i:~i:: :~:~i:' ii :::. : '
, , ,, ,;~ , , .,, . ...... ... .. . ...... . . .........:.:.:..:.....:............................. ......... .,,. ............... :: :il . ::. : . .
OM"OPERATING MAINTENANCE
~IEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
~roJoct
~..ek~ M Tm~..NM,M~ ~,~
~~~~ 1~,~ GT 1~.~ GT 1~,~ GT
BOLUNGER RD. BICYCLE FACILI~ IMPROVEMENTS
~ Co~ ~,~ GT
BUBB RD. AT MCCLEL~N INTERSECTION
MODIFICATIONS
~ C~ ~,~ GT
T~FFIC SIGNAL HARDWARE UPG~DE
Pr~ c~ 1~,~ GT
DEAN~ BLVD. AT STEVENS CREEK BLVD.
CROSSWALK ENH~CEMENT
(~ ~.~
Pr~ C~ 1~,~ GT
FOOTHILL BLVD. I VO$8 81GNAL REPLACEMENT
PmJe~ CoM 75,000 GT
ENHANCED WALKWAY$ IN UNIMPROVED AREAS
Project Cost 75,000 GT 75,000 GT 75,000 GT 75,000 GT
FOOTHILL BLVD. BIKE LANES
IMPERIAL AVENUE CUL-DE-SAC
Projec~ Cos~ ,~o,oo~
MARY AVE. BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE
I
MCCLELLAN RD(ORANGE TO LINDA VISTA)
Fro)K( Cost 2.5OO.OO(
MCCLELLAN ROAD/~TELLING TO DEANZA
· T~EN~ GANYON ROAD WlDENiN~
~ C~ ~.~ GT
City Council Worksession
Additi~nai CIP R~q~ests
-F~sscal Year 2000-2001
Item ~Requested by $ Estimate
1 ~Install sidewalk on Stevens Creek Blvd - Compaq property i Burnett $100,000
2 Improve the intersection of DeAnza and Stevens Creek ! Lowenthal $125,000
3 Install round a bout/bike plan on Stelling and Huntridge Lowenthal $125,000 CIP
4:Install sidewalks in Rancho Rinconada ~Lowenthal Completed
5 iParticipate in track and gymnasuim at Portal Middle School i CUSD $5,360,553
61Fitness/misc equipment for Sports Center rennovation i Park and Rec $525,000
i¢ip requests 00-01
Projects Committee Evaluation Sheet
CRITERfA 5 poktts 3 point~ I poi~s 0 points Score
Pub~ He;l~ and S~dy; Pm'lect needed to a~; Pr~ ~d to ~.~ate ~ m ~ ~uM ~ ~ m~ NO ~a~ or s~ im~
~Me ~ C~; ~ (~d ~ ~ ~d ~ C~
~c ~ P~ h~ ~a~ ~~ a ~ ~ff r~ ~at ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~d ~m pried ~ P~ has ~t e~ a s~c
L~~ ~m~~~ ~~~'~ ~~~s~~
~ mm~~8~ ~~~,~ ~~~m t.0
1.a (~ o~h ~) ~ff~r~ m~~h (~ ~~)
Emnam~ ~t Pr~ rely ~ ~1 ~ ~11 n~ ~ ~c
~et ~ ~ and ~m~ l~ m~m~m~ ~s~ ~g ~b ~or p~l ~ ~ ~omd m o~m
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
12
Overriding Considmation(s): TOTAL
Project involves a c~lcal fac~'fltylasset or essentral sYES I KO
A window of opportunity exhto for trd8 project
YES I NO
Otl~r:.
(
[,
C
[ Cupertino Capital Improvements Program (Costs in in $1~000)
Promise
Total to Need of Preserv
Funding Health & Communit Numbers Interest ation of Score Final Cumulative
Title Reqd. Safety y Benefitted Interests Served Group assets Total Ranking Cost
ADA $245 5 5 1 Handicapped 5 0 1 6 1 $245
Blackberry Farm $1,275 5 3 3 Patrons 4 1 1 6 2 $1,520
DeAnza Median Rainbow to
Prospect $75 4 4 4 Motorists 4 0 I 6 3 $1,595
Freemont Older Park Eastern
Improvements $2,000 1 5 3 Neighborhoods 4 1 1 4 4 $3,595
Signal Bollinger @ Tantau $100 5 2 2 Travelers, Neighbors 5 0 1 4 5 $3,695
McClellan Orange to Linda Drivers, Bikers,
Vista, Curb, Sidewalks $1,075 5 3 2 Walkers, Neighbors 4 0 1 4 6 $4,770
Homestead Medians, De Anza
to Franco $250 5 3 2 Motorists, Neighbors 4 0 1 4 ? $5,020
McClellan Stelling to DeAnza,
Curb, Sidewalks $410 4 2 3 Walkers, Disabled 4 0 1 3 8 $5,430
Bollinger Widening at Pedestrians,Nearby
Calabasas Creek $50 4 2 2 Residents 3 2 1 3 9 $5,480
Garden,
Environmental,
McClellan Ranch Bldgs. $301 3 3 1 Neighborhood 3 3 1 3 I 0 $5,781
Homestead West of 85
Sidewalks $120 4 1 I Walkers 4 0 1 0 I I $5,901
Freemont Older Park Houses Park users,
Pumhase $1,500 4 1 2 Neighbors 2 1 1 0 I 2 $7,401
Readers, Students,
Library Expansion $2,000 0 1 4 Reseamhers 3 2 1 0 1 3 $9,401
Rainbow DeAnza To Stelling
Medians $385 4 2 1 Local Residents 3 0 1 0 I 4 $9,786
Senior Center Expansion $955 1 2 2 Seniors 3 I 9 1 5 $10,741
Stevens Creek - Carmen to
Foothill Widening $300 3 2 2 Walkers, Disabled 2 0 9 I 6 $11,041
Stevens Creek E of Tantau
Sidewalks $56 3 2 2 Walkers, Disabled 2 0 9 1 7 $11,097
Forest Ave. S. Side
Curb,Gutter, Sidewalk $130 3 2 1 Walkers, Disabled 1 1 8 1 8 $11,227
Stocklmeir/Blesch/Nelson Land
6 Acres $4,500 0 2 2 Western Residents 1 0 5 I 9 $15,727
Stevens Creek Specific Plan $4,500 0 I 3 General I 0 5 2 0 $20,227
Signal Stevens Creek at Saich $150 3 0 1 Developer, Travelers I 0 5 21 $20,377
Imperial Cul-de-sac $ 50 1 I I Neighbors I 0 4 2 2 $20,427
Open Space ?? 0 0 3 Depends 1 0 4 2 3 #VALUE!