CC 06-18-19 #9 Housing Commission Work Program FY 2019-20_VM Chao's reportItem 3 from June 4 9:30 MTC/ABAG Regional Advisory Working Group meeting
https ://mtc.ca .gov /file/2 90986/ download ?toke n=b0Zee6n i
Item 3 : Cupertino is one region to be considered for office cap.
Meetin.g Agenda
Regiona l Advisory Working Group
Tuesday,June 2019 Yed>:a Buena -1st floor
3. 19-0534 onzon -Futures o nd 2: R stra egies · or ound 2 Analys.is
rose tation on proposed set of fi
second round of F res ana lysis .
mo ·on
· ael Germeraad
ateg es.pdf
V-7 Place Office Caps in Job-Rich Locations
Plan Bay Area 2040 and Futures Round 1 analysis included an office space caR in two Bay
Ar ea cities. The strategy was ineffective i n movi ng jobs to low-job areas in the region given
its limited geographic implementation. To study the effect of a more ex ansive strate y_
staff have develo ed a modified strategy to be applied in cities with ·obs-to-housing ratios
greater than or equal to 2.0 Cities affected by this strategy include: Colma , Brisbane , Mento
Park , South San Francisco , and Burlin ame i n San Mateo Cou nty; Palo Alto , Santa Clara ,
Mountain View, Milpitas, and Cu ertino in Santa Clara County; and Emeryville in Alameda
County . The goal of the strategy is to see where jobs would choose to relocate if limitations
wou l d put in place in job-rich areas. Staff acknowledge the critique that an office space cap
may have the unintended consequence of relocating jobs out of the region rather than to
other Bay Ar ea jurisdictions. While the land use modeling will not capture this potential ,
additi ona l off-model research will be prioritized to understand this unintended consequence.
Table: Office Cap Locations
(Strategy V-7)
Definition: Place office development
caps in eleven citi es with many more
jobs than residents -most of which are
located in above-a verage VMT per worker
locations .
Coordinated with: VMT Commercial
Development Fee (Strategy PBA-8),
w hich charges a fee on commercial
development outside of transit-rich
areas .
Bay Area Cities with Jobs-Housing Ratio >= 2.0
1 San Mateo County Colma 6.8
2 Santa Clara County Palo Alto 3 .5
3 Alameda County Emeryville 3.2
4 San Mateo County Brisbane 3 .1
5 San Mateo County Menlo Park 2.9
6 Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2 .5
7 Santa Clara County Mountain View 2.4
8 San Mateo County South San Francisco 2 .2
9 Santa Clara County Milpitas 2.1
10 Santa Clara County Cupertino 2 .0
11 San Mateo County Burlingame
Sou r ce : Ca lif ornia DOF; LEHD WA C (20 16)
9
Item 4 from 2019-06-04 MTC/ABAG Regional Advisory Working Group
https:// mtc.ca .gov /file/2 90986/ down load ?toke n=b0Zee6 n i
4. 1~0536 Area 2050 -Reg· Groi • doped
ea 2050 -Reg ·on Gr dope
.Shore
Attachments: pcfate: SummarySheetpdlf
Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments
Regional Advisory Working Group
June 4, 2019 Agenda Item 4
Report on Plan Ba y Area 2050 -Regional Growth Framework Adopted Update Overview
Subject: Report on Plan Bay Area 2050 -R egional Growth Framework Adopted Update
Ove1view .
Create h o PDA desianation which apply to existing and n.e, PDAs .:
Tran it-Rich PD . erved by a rail station, ferry te1minal, o bu s with 15-m inute
(freguencie s1during peak connnute period .
Connected Community PD . erved by a bns route wi th 30 -m inute fre quencie s
durin~ eak commute period and either: a located inside a · tate-de ignated High
Re source Area or b in a juri diction that ha adopted at lea t two upp011i e MT
reduction policie .
Plan .Bay Area 2050: Regional Growth Framework Update -Timeline
::1 • ·-.... , .. •, ~~.;,f, ~· ,-J~U:. • 1 ~~ .. '~ • ,_.: _ '.:.L .. • •• ,' • • , > •~ • ' ,,. • ~
:,for ,loca l'j udsdictiri ns in ~i:m:istgd .submit a new PDA/PCA/P~A or a modified ~DA/PCA:. . .. ·. : • .• ' fl; ~ ,• .. ~-•• .l,',,_ii:, .. •!.t'::.:":":'.1, I'. • -~.,~ ,~~~,-).,• ;_('~ \':" \ r-4.•">11 • > -,> , -', , ,I-,_.,.• ,t,). ,i ;, o :J., w•"':''"• ~,t, r • ~, ,,;. ~ • • • \ • • •~ ~ • ,-. .,. ~-• • "
Juno 2019 Announa> call for LottGrs o f lntQrost (mid-Jun e)
RQloasQ forms for submitting now or modifiQd priority aroas (mid-June)
July 2019
Wobinars, workshops a local prGSQntations by MTC/ ABAG (ongoing)
August 20 19
Soptgmoor 2019 Submissio n deadfine for Letters. of Interest (9/16/19)
Octooor 2019 RQViow of submittQd (gttgrs by MTC / ABAG staff
NovQmbgr 2019
Docombor 201 '9
Wobinars, workshops a local prGSQntations by MTC /ABAG ongoing)
Jan a ry2020 Deadline for City Council or Board of Supervisors Re:s-ol uti on of Support
Fobrua ry 2020 MTC /ABAG adoption of MW and modifiQd priority aroas
Ann unoo call for Lottgrs of lntont (mid-June)
RQlQaso form for ioontifying supportivo VMr r-oduction po icios (mid-June)
Juty 2019 ,___ _______ _, WQlfnars, orkshops & local pr.gsgntations by TC /ABAG (ongoing)
Augµst 20 9
Sopt@moor 2019 Submission deadline f or l etters of ,Intent ·( /1 6/1 9)
Octooor 2019 Ro ·ow of submittod lottors by MTC /ABAG staff
~· owmbor 2019 MTC /ABAG approval of transit/planning lottQrs o f lntont
illi?~~t ~EI~Rf€~~-:~th'!f·;~n-~.e~ctil ~-~-n:,:~~-~)tx!.~:A~--th~at~~o:.~~f q ~aijf}"a (~ig h'-~~~ource ·arei s :···_~·
JuM2019 Announco caU for LGttors of CommitmMt (mid-June)
Rdoaso form for idontifying supportivo VMT r-Gduction poticios i(mid-June)
Juty 2019
August 20 9
Soptomoor 2019
Wobinars, workshops 8: local prosontations by MTC / ABAG (onsoing)
Octobgr 201'9
Nowmb.Gr 20 9
Docomoor 2019
J anuary 2020 Submission deadline for Letters of Co mmitment (1/10/20 )
Percent Within 1/2 Pe rc.ent within 1/2 Percent Within 1/2
Mie of Transit MUe of Tronslt Mlle of Transit MTC
Meeting Current M .. ting Tr,nslMlich Meeting Connected PDAl'lan' EIR Funded
POANime Countv JI.Wisdlctlon Total Acres crtteria 1 Criteria1 Communities Criteria• Adooted Certified Plan
Santa dara Valley Transportation Authonty
Crty Cores, corridors & Station Area s Santa Clara Cupert.11l0 552 85'< No No
Timeline for Futures Round 2
June 2019 -August 2019
• Futures Round 2 Analysis -Reru n Fu t ures mode l i ng, incorporati ng new
strat egies and su mmarizing fi nd in gs in Fina l Futures Report.
September 2019 and Beyond
• Plan Bay Area 2050 Kickoff -Fi ndi ngs will be used to hel p policymake r s select
fina l proj ec t s and strategi es for the p r ef erred scena r io .
AB AG 2022 -20 3 0 RHNA an d P lan B ay Area 2050 Key M il estones
P er Government Code §65588( e )(3)(A), the Ho using E lement Due Date is 18 months after adoption of the Regional
Transportation P lan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTPISCS). Plan Bay Area 2050, the next regional plan, is
scheduled to be adopted in June -021, with the Housing Element Due D ate in December 20 ___ This schedule assumes that
there are subretzions D ates are tentative and subiect to change b
K ey Mileston es D eaclli ne
1 Plan B ay Area 2050 and RHNA Kickoff September 019
-Relea e Draft P lan Bay .A.rea 20 -0 Regional Growth Foreca t. Adopt Growth Frame, ork eptember 019
Update
3 Jurisdiction Sutv ey on RHNA factors , Fair H ousing 1 December 2019
4 Deadline for Subregions to F onn2 Febrnmy 2020
5 Adopt Final Plan Bay Area 2050 Regional Growth Foreca t~ Release Plan Bay Area 20 -0 April 2020
Draft Prefetnd Scenario
6 Dept. of Hous ing and Community D evelopment (HCD) Issues RHND 3 April 2020
7 Releas e Proposed Methodology, 4 Release Draft Subregion Shru·es May2020
8 Public Hearing on Propo ed Methodology, Subregion Shares JU11e 2020
9 Adopt Plan B ay Area 20 -0 Preferred Scenario July 2020
10 Assign Subregion Shares 5 July 2020
11 Releas e Draft Methodology and Submit to HCD for Review 6 September 2020
12 Release Plan Bay Area 2050 D raft P lan and EIR .,
January 2021 -
13 Adopt Final Methodology after 60-day HCD Review Pe1i o d 7 January 2021
14 Releas e Draft Allocation8 Januaiy 2021
15 Deadline for Appeals to Draft Allocation9 March 2021
16 Cmmnent Period o n Appeals Receiv ed10 April 2021
17 Public Hearing on Local Appeals 11 May2021
18 Decisio n on Appeals, Issue Final Allocation 12 May2021
19 dopt Plan Bay Area 20 -oFinal Plan and EIR June 20-1
20 Public Hearing to Adopt Final Allocation Plan 13 July 2021
21 HCD Determination of Consistency with Housing Element La w 14 Augus t 2021
22 L o cal Governments Ado pt Housing Element Update December 2022
<( z :c a:
"' z
0
G w a:
a:i
:::>
"'
{j Association of Bay Area Governments
Summary of Key Milestones
Key Milestones
Housing Methodology Committee kick-off
Subregions form
Regional Housing Need Determination
Proposed methodology ----~-~---~-~ Draft methodology
Final methodology, draft allocation
Appeals
Final allocation
Housing Element due date
Dates are tentative and subject to change
Association of Bay Area Governments
Proposed Deadline
October 2019
February 2020
April 2020
May 2020
September 2020
January 2021
March -May 2021
July 2021
December 2022
s
Item 5 from June 4 9 :30 MTC/ABAG Regional Advisory Working Group meeting
https:// mtc.ca .gov /fi le/2 90986/ down load ?to ken=b0Zee6n i
19-0541 eed cation ( )
) .
• pelf
Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments
Re ·onal Advisory Workin Grou
June 4, 2019 Agenda Item 5
Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA)
Subject: Repo11 on Regional Hou ing eed Allocation (RHNA)
Recent legi lation will re ult in the following ke · change for this RHNA cycle:
Expe ted hicller total regional hou ing need . H D identifi ation of the region ' total
ho in° need ha changed to accornn for uumet -exi-sting 11eed . rather than only projected
hou · ing ueed H D i now re guired to consider o ercrm ded hou ehol , co t burdened
hou eholds , and a minimum target vacancy rate
RHN
ore HCD o er ie.ht ofRHNA. ABAG and ubregior mu t no\ ubmit the draft
allocation methodology to HCD for re iev and comment.
erty
Summan of RHNA Objective (from Government Code §6558 4 (d) and (e))
The regional housing needs allocation plan hall further all of the following objectives :
(1) Increase housing upply and mix ofhou ing types. tenure, and affordability all citie and
counties within the region in an equitable manner
(2 ) Promote infill development and ocioeconomic equity, protect environmental and
agriculnrral re ource , encourage efficient development pattern , and achieve GHG
reduction targets
(3) Promote improved intraregional job -hou ing relation hip, including balance between
low-w age job and hous ing units affordable to low-wage worker in each juri diction
(4 ) Balance disproportionate household income distributions (more high-income RHNA to
lower-income area and vice-ver a)
(5) Affinnati ely finther fair housing