The URL can be used to link to this page

ERC Packet 06-20-2019CITY OF CUPERTINO AGENDA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 9:30 AM 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Conference Room C Thursday, June 20, 2019 ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Subject: Draft Minutes of December 13, 2018 Recommended Action: approve or modify the Draft Minutes of December 13, 2018 Draft Minutes of December 13, 2018 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the members on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the members from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC HEARINGS OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Subject: Welcome new Committee members Recommended Action: Welcome the new members and review the role and responsibilities of the Committee Chapter 2.84; Environmental Review Committee Example - Initial Study and ERC approval STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Page 1 June 20, 2019Environmental Review Committee AGENDA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment. Page 2 Community Development Department Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HELD ON December 13, 2018 Committee Members:Geoff Paulsen Aarti Shrivastava Steven Scharf Timm Borden Amy Chan Committee Members absent:Darcy Paul Staff present:Erick Serrano, Associate Planner David Stillman, Transportation Manager Chad Mosley, Civil Engineer Consultant Presenters:Michael Strahs, Kimco Realty Terri McCracken,Placeworks (Initial Study) Jessica Setiawan, Placeworks (Initial Study) APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 31, 2018 The minutes of the August 31, 2018 meeting were approved as written ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Reserved for persons wishing to address the Committee on issues that are not already included in the regular Order of Business) None PUBLIC HEARING: 1.Application No.(s):EA-2017-06, GPA-2017-05, DP-2018-04, DA-2017-01, ASA-2017-09, TR-2017-46 Applicant(s):Michael Strahs (Kimco Realty) Location: 10801 N Wolfe Rd APN # 316-45-017 The project Applicant is proposing the Cupertino Village Hotel Project which would construct a boutique hotel on a 1.72-acre site in the Cupertino Village Shopping Center. The project would also involve demolition of two existing commercial buildings on the sites. The development would be a new 5-story, 185-room boutique hotel including event meeting rooms, a restaurant, and rooftop lounge and bar. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. Geologic/Soils o Standard construction techniques for earthquake zones are incorporated in the construction calculations Hydrology o The Initial Study indicated that there is less than a significant impact on the exiting sewer system, however, a mitigation measure has been drafted which be implemented should the hotel’s operation exceed the contractual limit Trees/Landscaping o 68 trees are on site o City trees along Wolfe Road will not be removed Air Quality/Traffic o Mitigation measures will be employed during construction for dust control o One driveway will be closed but the trip count shift to other driveways is minimal o A shuttle service program, joint with other local businesses, will be explored in the future o Both of the parking garages on the site are available to hotel guests and retail shoppers creating more parking spaces than are required by the Ordinance Archeological/Cultural/Biological o There will be a Stop Work Order in the construction documents should any remains or artifacts be discovered on site. o A tribal resource specific mitigation has been incorporated into the Iinitial Study o No known habitats have been identified, however, should construction fall during nesting season, all measures will be taken to ensure the safety of the nests Noise o Construction Best Management Practices will be employed to reduce construction noise to the surrounding businesses and neighbors Additional Discussion o Valet parking service will be offered to customers to the shopping center during construction o The hotel location on the site hopefully will encourage more pedestrian traffic than car traffic by hotel guests ACTION: Recommendation for approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for EA-2017-06 MOTION: Paulsen SECOND: Scharf NOES: none VOTE: 5-0-0 OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, /s/Beth Ebben Beth Ebben Deputy Board Clerk CITY OF CUPERTINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Alcalde Road Lot Split Project INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION January 2018 1501 Sports Drive, Suite A,  Sacramento  CA  95834 Office 916.372.6100  Fax 916.419.610 Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i January 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 1 B. SOURCES ....................................................................................................................................... 2 C. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ............................................. 3 D. DETERMINATION ...................................................................................................................... 4 E. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 5 F. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 5 G. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST .......................................................................................... 11 I. AESTHETICS........................................................................................................12 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. .................................................14 III. AIR QUALITY. .....................................................................................................16 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. ..............................................................................24 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. .................................................................................27 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. .....................................................................................30 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. .....................................................................33 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. ...............................................36 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. ..........................................................42 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. ............................................................................46 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. ....................................................................................47 XII. NOISE. ...................................................................................................................48 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. .........................................................................51 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. ............................................................................................52 XV. RECREATION. .....................................................................................................54 XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION. .....................................................55 XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. ..................................................................58 XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. .............................................................59 XIX. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. .............................................62 Appendix Air Quality and GHG Modeling Results Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1 January 2018 INITIAL STUDY January 2018 A. BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Alcalde Road Lot Split Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Cupertino Community Development Department 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gian Paolo Martire Associate Planner (408) 777-3319 4. Project Location: 22561 Alcalde Road Cupertino, CA 95014 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: Cindy Hsu Greenleaf Group LLC 10229 Scenic Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 6. General Plan Designation: Low/Medium Density (5-10 du/ac.) 7. Zoning Designation: Single-Family Residential (R1-7.5)] 8. Project Description Summary: The Alcalde Road Lot Split Project is located at 22561 Alcalde Road in the City of Cupertino, California. The proposed project site is bordered by Alcalde Road to the south, and by existing one- and two-story, single-family residential development to the north, east, and west. Additional single-family homes are located south of the site across Alcalde Road. The project would include demolition of a small number of existing on-site structures and subdivision of the 19,562-square-foot property into two approximately 8,892-square-foot lots. The site would be redeveloped with two single-family two-story residences. In addition, the proposed project would include widening of the Alcalde Road right-of-way along the project frontage. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 January 2018 B. SOURCES The following documents are referenced information sources used for purposes of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: 1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Plans & Climate. Available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate. Accessed September 2017. 2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status. Available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/research-and-data/air-quality-standards-and- attainment-status. Accessed November 2017. 3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CalEEMod Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimates for the Proposed Alcalde Road Lot Split Project, Cupertino, California. January 2018. 4. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act, Air Quality Guidelines. May 2017. 5. California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model, User’s Guide, Version 2016.3.2. November 2017. 6. California Department of Conservation. Santa Clara County Important Farmland Map 2014. Published October 2016. 7. California Department of Conservation. Special Studies Zones, Cupertino Quadrangle. Effective July 1, 1974. 8. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Santa Clara County, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. October 8, 2008. 9. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. Available at: http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. Accessed March 2017. 10. California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm. Accessed March 2017. 11. California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration, Guidance Manual. September 2013. 12. California Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005. 13. City of Cupertino. Emergency Operations Plan. September 2005. 14. City of Cupertino. General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning Draft EIR. June 18, 2014. 15. City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040. Adopted October 20, 2015. 16. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition. September 2012. 17. PIERS Environmental Services. Addendum to Report of Subsurface Investigation and Transmittal of Additional Results, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California. January 8, 2018. 18. PIERS Environmental Services. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California 95014. July 17, 2017. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 January 2018 19. PIERS Environmental Services. Report of Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California 95014. August 19, 2017. C. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.  Aesthetics  Agriculture and Forest Resources  Air Quality  Biological Resources  Cultural Resources  Geology and Soils  Greenhouse Gas Emissions  Hazards and Hazardous Materials  Hydrology and Water Quality  Land Use and Planning  Mineral Resources  Noise  Population and Housing  Public Services  Recreation  Transportation and Circulation  Tribal Cultural Resources  Utilities and Service Systems  Mandatory Findings of Significance Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 January 2018 D. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial study:  I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.  I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.  I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.  I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.  I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Gian Paolo Martire, Associate Planner City of Cupertino Printed Name For Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5 January 2018 E. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION This Initial Study identifies and analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the Alcalde Road Lot Split Project (proposed project). The information and analysis presented in this document is organized in accordance with the order of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) checklist in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Where the analysis provided in this document identifies potentially significant environmental effects of the project, mitigation measures are prescribed. The mitigation measures prescribed for environmental effects described in this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) would be implemented in conjunction with the project, as required by CEQA. The mitigation measures would be incorporated into the project through project conditions of approval. The City would adopt findings and a Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program for the project in conjunction with approval of the project. On October 20, 2015, the City of Cupertino adopted an amended General Plan 1 and an associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR).2 The General Plan EIR is a program EIR, prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq.). The General Plan EIR analyzed full implementation of the General Plan and identified measures to mitigate the significant adverse impacts associated with buildout of the General Plan. The proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan; therefore, in accordance with Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines (Section 21083.3 of the Public Resources Code), this IS/MND will tier from the previously certified EIR (SCH# 2014032007) prepared for the City’s General Plan where appropriate. F. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following provides a description of the project site’s current location and setting, as well as the proposed project components and the discretionary actions required for the project. Project Location and Setting The proposed project site consists of an approximately 19,562-square-foot (0.45-acre) property located at 22561 Alcalde Road in the City of Cupertino, California (see Figure 1). The site is identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 341-29-063 and is zoned Single-Family Residential with a minimum lot size of 7,500 (R1-7.5). The City’s General Plan designates the site as Low/Medium Density (5-10 du/ac). The proposed project site is bordered by Alcalde Road to the south, and by existing one- and two-story, single-family residential development to the north, east, and west (see Figure 2). Additional single-family homes are located south of the site across Alcalde Road. The nearest major roadway, South Foothill Boulevard, is located approximately 165 feet east of the site. 1 City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040. Adopted October 20, 2015. 2 City of Cupertino. General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning Draft EIR. June 18, 2014. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 January 2018 Figure 1 Regional Location N Project Location Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 7 January 2018 Figure 2 Project Vicinity Map Project Site N Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8 January 2018 The proposed project site currently contains a residence (approximately 2,520 square feet). Access to the residence is provided by a concrete driveway from Alcalde Road. A 180-square-foot shed and a concrete patio are also present on the site. Vegetation on the site consists primarily of landscaping associated with the residence, including some grass and shrubs, as well as nine trees. Aquatic or riparian habitat on or in the vicinity of the site does not exist. Currently sidewalks do not exist along the frontage of the project site. Existing sidewalks along Alcalde Road are discontinuous in the vicinity of the project site, particularly towards the west of the site; however, portions of the existing sidewalks along Alcalde Road connect to other nearby roadways including Santa Lucia Road and Lockwood Drive to the west of the project site, and South Foothill Boulevard to the east. Project Components The proposed project would include demolition of the existing on-site residence and associated structures, removal of seven of the on-site trees, subdivision of the 19,562-square-foot lot into two approximately 8,892-square-foot lots, and redevelopment of the site with two single-family two- story residences (see Figure 3). In addition, the proposed project would include widening of the Alcalde Road right-of-way by ten feet at the widest point (an approximately 370-square-foot area) along the project frontage, which would be dedicated to the City. The project would be consistent with the existing zoning and General Plan land use designations for the site. Both of the proposed single-family residences would be two stories. As shown in Figure 4, the proposed single-family residences would include attached garages, and front and rear porch areas. Sewer and water service for the proposed residences would be provided by the City by way of connections to existing sanitary sewer and water supply lines located in Alcalde Road. New paved driveways would connect the garages of the two residences to the widened roadway. On-site runoff would be captured by a new series of downspouts on the eastern and western sides of both of the proposed residences (see Figure 4). Runoff from the downspouts would enter a six- inch perforated pipe continuing into a bubbler drain system that would collect and route the water onto vegetated areas within the front yards of the proposed residences. Discretionary Action Implementation of the proposed project would require City approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the proposed project site into two approximately 8,892-square-foot lots. . Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 9 January 2018 Figure 3 Conceptual Site Plan Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 January 2018 Figure 4 Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 11 January 2018 G. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following Checklist contains the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The checklist form is used to describe the impacts of the proposed project. A discussion follows each environmental issue identified in the checklist. Included in each discussion are project-specific mitigation measures recommended, as appropriate, as part of the proposed project. For this checklist, the following designations are used: Potentially Significant Impact: An impact that could be significant, and for which no mitigation has been identified. If any potentially significant impacts are identified, an EIR must be prepared. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: An impact that requires mitigation to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. Less-Than-Significant Impact: Any impact that would not be considered significant under CEQA relative to existing standards. No Impact: The project would not have any impact Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 12 January 2018 I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?     b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?     c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?     d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?     Discussion a,b. Examples of typical scenic vistas would include mountain ranges, ridgelines, or bodies of water as viewed from a highway, public space, or other area designated for the express purpose of viewing and sightseeing. In general, a project’s impact to a scenic vista would occur if development of the project would substantially change or remove a scenic vista. Given that the proposed project site is currently developed and is located in a residential neighborhood, redevelopment of the site with two single-family two-story homes would not obstruct views of a scenic vista. Furthermore, according to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, the proposed project site is located approximately 4.5 miles north of the nearest State Scenic Highway, State Route (SR) 9, and approximately 1.2 miles south of Interstate 280 (I-280), an Eligible State Scenic Highway.3 Neither SR 9 or I-280 are visible from the project site. Based on the above discussion, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista and would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. Thus, no impact would occur related to such. c. Distinguishing between public and private views is important when evaluating changes to visual character or quality, because private views are views seen from privately-owned land and are typically associated with individual viewers, including views from private residences. Public views are experienced by the collective public, and include views of significant landscape features and along scenic roads. According to CEQA (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) case law, only public views, not private views, are protected under CEQA. For example, in Association for Protection etc. Values v. City of Ukiah (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 720 [3 Cal. Rptr.2d 488], the court determined that “we must differentiate between adverse impacts upon particular persons and adverse impacts upon the environment of persons in general. As recognized by the court in Topanga Beach Renters 3 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm. Accessed March 2017. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 13 January 2018 Assn. v. Department of General Services (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 188 [129 Cal.Rptr. 739]: ‘[A]ll government activity has some direct or indirect adverse effect on some persons. The issue is not whether [the project] will adversely affect particular persons but whether [the project] will adversely affect the environment of persons in general.’” Therefore, the focus in this section is on potential impacts to public views. Sensitive public viewers in the surrounding area would primarily consist of motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists travelling on Alcalde Road. Views of the proposed project site from Alcalde Road currently consist of the existing on- site single-family residence, the existing on-site driveway, and various trees and shrubs located on the southern portion of the site. The project site is bordered on the east and west by two-story, single-family residences. The proposed project would include demolition of the existing on-site structures, removal of a majority of the on-site vegetation, and redevelopment of the site with two single-family two-story residences and new landscape plantings. As discussed previously, Alcalde Road would be widened along the project frontage. The proposed residences would be designed to be visually congruous with the existing residences to the east and west of the project site. Given that the site is already developed with a residential use, and the project would be consistent with the surrounding single-family residential development, the project would not substantially degrade the aesthetic character or quality of the site for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists travelling along Alcalde Road. In addition, the project would be consistent with the site’s existing zoning and General Plan land use designations. As such, changes to aesthetic character and quality associated with buildout of the site have been previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, impacts related to degrading the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings would be less than significant. d. The project site is currently developed with a residential structure, and, thus, the site contains existing sources of light and glare associated with such, including, but not limited to, headlights on cars using the on-site driveway, exterior light fixtures, and interior light spilling through windows. In addition, the site is surrounded by existing residential development that currently generates similar light and glare in the area. Therefore, redevelopment of the site with two residential homes would not introduce new sources of substantial light or glare to the site which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area, and implementation of the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 14 January 2018 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?     b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?     c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?     d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?     e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland to non-agricultural use?     Discussion a,e. The proposed project site is currently developed with a residential use and is surrounded by existing residential development. While the project site and vicinity to the north and east historically consisted of orchards, the site was developed with the existing residence in 1962. 4 Thus, the site has not been used for agricultural production for some time and is currently designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” on the Santa Clara County Important Farmland map.5 Furthermore, the site is not zoned or designated in the General Plan for agricultural uses. Given the designation of the site as Urban and Built-Up Land, development of the proposed project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use, or otherwise result in the loss of Farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore, no impact would occur as a result of the proposed project. b. The proposed project site is not under a Williamson Act contract and is not designated or zoned for agricultural uses. Therefore, buildout of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract, and no impact would occur. 4 PIERS Environmental Services. Report of Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California 95014. August 19, 2017. 5 California Department of Conservation. Santa Clara County Important Farmland Map 2014. Published October 2016. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 15 January 2018 c,d. The project site is not considered forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220[g]), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), and is not zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104[g]). The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low/Medium Density Residential. The zoning designation for the project site is Single-Family Residential. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact with regard to conversion of forest land or any potential conflict with forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production zoning. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 16 January 2018 III. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?     b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?     c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?     d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?     e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?     a,b. The City of Cupertino is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The SFBAAB is currently designated as a nonattainment area for the State and federal ozone, State and federal fine particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), and State respirable particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The SFBAAB is designated attainment or unclassified for all other AAQS. It should be noted that on January 9, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued a final rule to determine that the Bay Area has attained the 24- hour PM2.5 federal AAQS. Nonetheless, the Bay Area must continue to be designated as nonattainment for the federal PM2.5 AAQS until such time as the BAAQMD submits a redesignation request and a maintenance plan to the USEPA, and the USEPA approves the proposed redesignation. In compliance with regulations, due to the nonattainment designations of the area, the BAAQMD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the AAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions through regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies. The current air quality plans are prepared in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). The most recent federal ozone plan is the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan, which was adopted on October 24, 2001 and approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on November 1, 2001. The plan was submitted to the USEPA on November 30, 2001 for review and approval. The most recent State ozone plan is the 2010 Clean Air Plan (CAP), adopted on September 15, 2010. The 2010 CAP was developed as a multi-pollutant plan that provides an integrated control strategy to reduce ozone, PM, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Although a plan for achieving the State PM10 standard is not required, the BAAQMD has prioritized measures to reduce PM in Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 17 January 2018 developing the control strategy for the 2010 CAP. The control strategy serves as the backbone of the BAAQMD’s current PM control program. The aforementioned air quality plans contain mobile source controls, stationary source controls, and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the State and federal AAQS within the SFBAAB. Adopted BAAQMD rules and regulations, as well as the thresholds of significance, have been developed with the intent to ensure continued attainment of AAQS, or to work towards attainment of AAQS for which the area is currently designated nonattainment, consistent with applicable air quality plans. The BAAQMD’s established significance thresholds associated with development projects for emissions of the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), as well as for PM10, and PM2.5, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day) and tons per year (tons/yr), are listed in Table 1. By exceeding the BAAQMD’s mass emission thresholds for operational emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10, or PM2.5 a project would be considered to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the BAAQMD’s air quality planning efforts. Table 1 BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance Pollutant Construction Operational Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year) ROG 54 54 10 NOx 54 54 10 PM10 (exhaust) 82 82 15 PM2.5 (exhaust) 54 54 10 Source: BAAQMD, CEQA Guidelines, May 2017. The proposed project’s construction and operational emissions were quantified using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) software version 2016.3.2 - a Statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify air quality emissions, including GHG emissions, from land use projects. The model applies inherent default values for various land uses, including construction data, trip generation rates based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, vehicle mix, trip length, average speed, etc. In addition, the model assumes compliance with the most recent 2016 Title 24 Standards. However, where project-specific information is available, such information should be applied in the model. Accordingly, the proposed project’s modeling assumed the following: • Construction would occur over an approximately five-month period; • The existing structures to be demolished was assumed to consist of a total of approximately 5,166 square feet; • A total of approximately 0.45-acre of land would be disturbed during site preparation; Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 18 January 2018 • A total of 130 cubic yards of material would be imported during site preparation; and • A total of 363 cubic yards of material could be exported during site preparation as part of the soil remediation activities discussed in Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this IS/MND. It should be noted that the actual volume of soil to be removed would likely be less; however, the soil amount assumed is based on a worst-case scenario in order to provide a conservative analysis. All CalEEMod results are included as an appendix to this IS/MND. The proposed project’s estimated emissions associated with construction and operations are presented and discussed in further detail below. A discussion of the proposed project’s contribution to cumulative air quality conditions is provided below as well. Construction Emissions According to the CalEEMod results, the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated construction criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 2. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s construction emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance for ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. Table 2 Maximum Unmitigated Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Pollutant Proposed Project Emissions Threshold of Significance Exceeds Threshold? ROG 1.89 54 NO NOX 30.31 54 NO PM10 (exhaust) 0.86 82 NO PM10 (fugitive) 1.66 None N/A PM2.5 (exhaust) 0.80 54 NO PM2.5 (fugitive) 0.44 None N/A Source: CalEEMod, January 2018 (see appendix). Although thresholds of significance for mass emissions of fugitive dust PM10 and PM2.5 have not been identified by the City of Cupertino or BAAQMD, the proposed project’s estimated fugitive dust emissions have been included for informational purposes. All projects within the jurisdiction of the BAAQMD are required to implement all of the BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures, which include the following: 1. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. 2. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. 3. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 19 January 2018 4. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. 5. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. 6. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer‘s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. 7. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. The proposed project’s implementation of the BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures listed above would help to further minimize construction-related emissions. Because the proposed project would be below the applicable thresholds of significance for construction emissions, the proposed project would not be considered to result in a significant air quality impact during construction. Operational Emissions According to the CalEEMod results, the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated operational criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 3. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s operational emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance. Because the proposed project’s operational emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance, the proposed project would result in a less- than-significant air quality impact during operations. Table 3 Maximum Unmitigated Operational Emissions Pollutant Proposed Project Emissions Threshold of Significance Exceeds Threshold? lbs/day tons/yr lbs/day tons/yr ROG 2.20 0.04 54 10 NO NOX 0.22 0.03 54 10 NO PM10 (exhaust) 0.38 0.00 82 15 NO PM10 (fugitive) 0.09 0.02 None None N/A PM2.5 (exhaust) 0.38 0.00 54 10 NO PM2.5 (fugitive) 0.03 0.00 None None N/A Source: CalEEMod, January 2018 (see appendix). Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 20 January 2018 Conclusion As stated previously, the applicable regional air quality plans include the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan and the 2010 CAP. According to BAAQMD, if a project would not result in significant and unavoidable air quality impacts after the application of all feasible mitigation, the project may be considered consistent with the air quality plans. Because the proposed project would result in emissions below BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance, the proposed project would not be considered to conflict with or obstruct the implementation of any regional air quality plans, violate any air quality standard, or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Therefore, a less- than-significant impact would occur. c. Past, present and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. A single project is not sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, BAAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. The thresholds of significance presented in Table 1 represent the levels at which a project’s individual emissions of criteria air pollutants or precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SFBAAB’s existing air quality conditions. If a project exceeds the significance thresholds presented in Table 1, the proposed project’s emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse cumulative air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions. Because the proposed project would result in emissions below the applicable thresholds of significance for both construction and operation, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the region’s existing air quality conditions. Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would result. d. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others, due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Heightened sensitivity may be caused by health problems, proximity to the emissions source, and/or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with existing health problems are especially vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. Sensitive receptors are typically defined as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (i.e., children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. Accordingly, land uses that are typically considered to be sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, retirement homes, convalescent homes, hospitals, and medical clinics. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 21 January 2018 The nearest existing sensitive receptors to the project site would be the single-family residences located immediately to the east, north, and west of the site. The major pollutant concentrations of concern are localized carbon monoxide (CO) emissions and TAC emissions, which are addressed in further detail below. Localized CO Emissions Localized concentrations of CO are related to the levels of traffic and congestion along streets and at intersections. High levels of localized CO concentrations are only expected where background levels are high, and traffic volumes and congestion levels are high. Emissions of CO are of potential concern, as the pollutant is a toxic gas that results from the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels such as gasoline or wood. CO emissions are particularly related to traffic levels. In order to provide a conservative indication of whether a project would result in localized CO emissions that would exceed the applicable threshold of significance, the BAAQMD has established screening criteria for localized CO emissions. According to BAAQMD, a proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to localized CO emission concentrations if all of the following conditions are true for the project: • The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans; • The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour; and • The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, underpass, etc.). The applicable Congestion Management Plan (CMP) for the proposed project site is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) CMP.6 As discussed in the Transportation and Circulation section of this IS/MND, the proposed project would not conflict with the VTA CMP. In addition, the proposed project would be anticipated to generate a total of 19 average daily trips (ADT). Given the relatively small number of trips that would be generated, the project would not substantially affect traffic volumes at intersections in the project vicinity. Furthermore, areas where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is limited due to tunnels, underpasses, or similar features do not exist in the project area. As such, based on the BAAQMD screening criteria, the proposed project would not be expected to result in substantial levels of localized CO at surrounding intersections or generate localized concentrations of CO that would exceed standards. 6 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. 2013 Congestion Management Program. October 2013. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 January 2018 TAC Emissions Another category of environmental concern is TACs. The CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (Handbook) provides recommended setback distances for sensitive land uses from major sources of TACs, including, but not limited to, freeways and high traffic roads, distribution centers, and rail yards. The CARB has identified diesel particulate matter (DPM) from diesel-fueled engines as a TAC; thus, high volume freeways, stationary diesel engines, and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic are identified as having the highest associated health risks from DPM. Health risks associated with TACs are a function of both the concentration of emissions and the duration of exposure, where the higher the concentration and/or the longer the period of time that a sensitive receptor is exposed to pollutant concentrations would correlate to a higher health risk. The proposed project would not involve any land uses or operations that would be considered major sources of TACs, including DPM. As such, the proposed project would not generate any substantial pollutant concentrations during operations. However, short- term, construction-related activities could result in the generation of TACs, specifically DPM, from on-road haul trucks and off-road equipment exhaust emissions. Nevertheless, construction is temporary and occurs over a relatively short duration in comparison to the operational lifetime of the proposed project. All construction equipment and operation thereof would be regulated per the In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation, which is intended to help reduce emissions associated with off-road diesel vehicles and equipment, including DPM. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources. In addition, construction activity (except for street construction) would be limited to daytime hours per Section 10.48.053 of the City’s Municipal Code. Because construction equipment on-site would not operate for long periods of time and would occur on a relatively small scale, associated emissions of DPM would be minimal. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the relatively short duration of potential exposure to associated emissions, sensitive receptors in the area would not be exposed to pollutants for a permanent or substantially extended period of time. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not be expected to expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Conclusion Based on the above, the proposed project would not expose any sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of localized CO or TACs from construction or operation. Therefore, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e. Due to the subjective nature of odor impacts, the number of variables that can influence the potential for an odor impact, and the variety of odor sources, quantitative methodologies to determine the presence of a significant odor impact do not exist. Typical Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 23 January 2018 odor-generating land uses include, but are not limited to, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and composting facilities. The proposed project would not introduce any such land uses. Residential land uses, such as the proposed single-family homes, are not typically associated with objectionable odors. Construction activities often include diesel-fueled equipment and heavy-duty trucks, which could create odors associated with diesel fumes that may be considered objectionable. However, as discussed above, construction activities would be temporary, and operation of construction equipment would be restricted to daytime hours per the City’s Municipal Code. Project construction would also be required to comply with all applicable BAAQMD rules and regulations, particularly associated with permitting of air pollutant sources. The aforementioned regulations would help to minimize air pollutant emissions, as well as any associated odors. Accordingly, substantial objectionable odors would not be expected to occur during construction activities. For the aforementioned reasons, construction and operation of the proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and a less-than- significant impact related to objectionable odors would result. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 January 2018 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?     b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service?     c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?     d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites?     e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?     f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?     Discussion a. The proposed project site comprises a 19,562-square-foot property located in a residential neighborhood. The site is currently developed with a residential use and is highly disturbed as a result. Vegetation on the site consists of landscaping associated with the residence, including some grass and shrubs, as well as nine trees (seven of which are to be removed). The proposed project site does not contain any aquatic or riparian habitat. A query of CNDDB was performed in order to determine the potential plant and wildlife species that could occur within the proposed project area. The Cupertino Quad was used as the search area. The CNDDB query results indicate 18 special-status plant and wildlife species that are known to occur within the project vicinity. However, due to the highly- disturbed nature of the project site, the requisite habitat types for any of the identified special-status species do not occur on-site. For example, the species require aquatic, Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 25 January 2018 woodland, chaparral, or proximate open grassland habitat, which does not occur on-site or in the immediate project vicinity. While special-status species would not occur on-site, migratory birds have the potential to nest within the on-site trees and shrubs. Birds and their nests are protected under California Fish and Game Code (Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3513), and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The proposed project would include removal of trees during construction, and, thus, could result in impacts to nesting raptors and/or migratory birds, potentially occurring in the trees. Therefore, the proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and a potentially significant impact could result. Mitigation Measure(s) Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above impact to a less-than-significant level. IV-1. A pre-construction survey for nesting birds shall be conducted for the project site and a 250-foot radius around the project site by a qualified biologist not more than two weeks prior to site disturbance during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31). If site disturbance commences outside the breeding season, a pre-construction survey for nesting birds is not required. If active nests of migratory birds are not detected within approximately 250 feet of the project site, further mitigation is not required. Results of the survey shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. If nesting raptors or other migratory birds are detected on or within 250 feet of the site during the survey, a suitable construction-free buffer shall be established around all active nests. The dimensions of the buffer shall be a minimum of 75 feet for passerine birds and 250 feet for raptors. The buffer size may vary depending on location and species. The buffer areas shall be enclosed with temporary fencing, and construction equipment and workers shall not enter the enclosed setback areas. Buffers shall remain in place for the duration of the breeding season or until a qualified biologist has confirmed that all chicks have fledged and are independent of their parents. b,c. The project site is currently developed with a residential use, and, thus, is highly disturbed. The site does not contain any aquatic features or riparian habitat, and sensitive plant communities, including wetlands, do not exist on or near the site. As a result, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or federally protected wetlands. Thus, no impact would occur. d. The project site is surrounded by existing development and is not linked to any open space areas through which wildlife movement would occur. As noted above, the project does not Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 January 2018 contain streams or other waterways that could be used by migratory fish or as a wildlife corridor for other wildlife species. As such, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites. Thus, no impact would occur. e. Based on the project plans, as shown in Figure 3, the project would involve the removal of seven trees, some of which may be considered protected trees pursuant to Section 14.18.050 of the City’s Municipal Code. If the on-site trees to be removed are indeed protected trees, the applicant must first obtain a tree removal permit from the City’s Community Development Department and pay the permit fee. The information required when submitting a tree removal permit application, includes, but is not limited to, the following: • A drawing outlining the location of the tree(s) and proposed tree replacements. • A written explanation of why the tree(s) should be removed. In conjunction with the tree removal permit, the City would impose tree replacement standards or in-lieu fees pursuant to Section 14.18.160 of the Municipal Code. Furthermore, per Section 14.18.060 of the Municipal Code, the project applicant would be required to adopt a maintenance plan for any protected trees that would be retained as part of the project. Compliance with Chapter 14.18 of the City’s Municipal Code, as described above, would ensure that the proposed project would not conflict with the City’s tree preservation policies and ordinances. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. f. The City of Cupertino is not currently participatory to a Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP). Therefore, the project site is not located in an area with an approved HCP/NCCP, or local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan, and no impact would occur regarding a conflict with the provisions of such a plan. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 27 January 2018 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?     b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?     c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource on site or unique geologic features?     d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.     Discussion a. Historical resources are features that are associated with the lives of historically-important persons and/or historically-significant events, or that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction. Examples of typical historical resources include, but are not limited to, buildings, farmsteads, rail lines, bridges, and trash scatters containing objects such as colored glass and ceramics. As discussed previously, the proposed project site currently contains a residential structure and a shed. According to a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared for the proposed project by PIERS Environmental Services, the on-site residence was constructed circa 1962. In order to determine whether the on-site structures constitute historical resources, the structures were evaluated using the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility criteria. CRHR Criteria The CRHR eligibility criteria include the following: (1) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the U.S.; (2) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; (3) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or (4) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. In addition, the resource must retain integrity. Integrity is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 January 2018 NRHP Criteria The NRHP eligibility criteria include the following: “The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of state and local importance that possess aspects of integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, and (a) is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; (b) is associated with the lives of a person or persons significance in our past; (c) embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic value, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or (d) has yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. In addition, the resource must be at least 50 years old, except in exceptional circumstances. Evaluation The existing on-site structures are not associated with any significant historical events or narratives in the City of Cupertino or California, and are not likely to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. The site has not been occupied or owned by any persons important to local, State, or national history, and, thus, is not associated with the lives of a person or persons of significance. Additionally, the residence does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, represent the work of a master, possess high artistic value, or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Conclusion Based on the above, the on-site structures are not eligible for consideration as historical resources per the CRHR or NRHP eligibility criteria, and, thus, would not be considered historical resources. Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b-d. The proposed project site is currently developed with a residential structure, and, thus, is highly disturbed. In addition, the site is located within a residential neighborhood. Due to the disturbed nature of the site and the surrounding area, the discovery of underlying archeological, paleontological, and/or tribal resources is not expected. However, unknown archaeological resources, including human bone, have the potential to be uncovered during ground-disturbing construction activities at the proposed project site. In compliance with State law (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code), as well as the City’s standard conditions of Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 29 January 2018 approval, in the event human remains are encountered during grading and construction, all work within 50 feet of the find would be stopped, and the Santa Clara County Coroner’s office would be notified. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner would notify the Native American Heritage Commission to identify the “Most Likely Descendant” (MLD). The City of Cupertino, in consultation with the MLD, would then prepare a plan for treatment, study, and re-internment of the remains. Therefore, given the low likelihood of encountering resources, and the proposed project’s compliance with the City’s standard conditions of approval regarding cultural resources, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or geological feature on site, or disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 January 2018 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area based on other substantial evidence of a known fault (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Pub. 42)?     ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?     iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?     iv. Landslides?     b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?     c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off- site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?     d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?     e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?     a,c. According to the California Geological Survey Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps, the proposed project site is not located within the vicinity of an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.7 Figure HS-5 in the City’s General Plan identifies areas in the City that are potentially at risk for fault rupture, landslides, and liquefaction/inundation. Areas mapped as Liquefaction/Inundation Zones by the City are also generally at risk for lateral spreading hazards.8 Per Figure HS-5, the site is located within a Valley Zone, which is defined as an area with relatively low levels of geologic hazard risk. Therefore, the proposed project would not be at risk for fault rupture impacts, seismic-related ground failure (including liquefaction, lateral spreading and subsidence), or landslides. In addition, the project would be designed to comply with all applicable State and local regulations, including the California Building Code (CBC), which would minimize any potential risks associated with seismic ground shaking. 7 California Department of Conservation. Special Studies Zones, Cupertino Quadrangle. Effective July 1, 1974. 8 City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040 [pg. E-5]. Adopted October 20, 2015. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 31 January 2018 Consequently, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, and/or liquefaction or landslides. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would result. b. The proposed project would require excavation and grading of the site prior to construction, including soil excavation and off-haul associated with on-site soil remediation (see Section VIII for additional discussion). During such early stages of construction, topsoil would be exposed. After grading and prior to overlaying the ground surface with structures, while topsoil would be exposed, the potential exists for wind and/or water erosion to occur, which could affect the project area and potentially inadvertently transport eroded soils to downstream waterways. However, topsoil exposure would be temporary during site preparation and would cease once development of the proposed single-family homes occurs. The City’s Municipal Code requires applicants to provide and comply with an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Interim Plan). The Interim Plan shall show the location of erosion control measures and erosion control planting shall be shown on the site map/grading plan. The applicant shall provide the following information with respect to conditions existing on the site during land-disturbing or filling activities or stockpiling of soil: 1. A delineation and brief description of the measures to be undertaken to retain sediment on the site, including, but not limited to, the designs and specifications or berms and sediment detention basins, and a schedule for their maintenance and upkeep; 2. A delineation and brief description of the surface runoff and erosion control measures to be implemented, including, but not limited, to types and methods of applying mulches, and designs and specifications for diverters, dikes and drains, and a schedule for their maintenance and upkeep; 3. A delineation and brief description of the vegetative measures to be undertaken, including, but not limited to, seeding methods, and type, location and extent of preexisting and undisturbed vegetation types, and a schedule for maintenance and upkeep. Because the project would comply with the City’s interim erosion control requirements, the project would not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Therefore, a less- than-significant impact would occur. d. Expansive soils increase in volume when they absorb water and have the potential to crack or otherwise compromise the integrity of building foundations. According to the City’s General Plan EIR, the proposed project site is not located in an area of the City known to contain highly expansive soils.9 Furthermore, the proposed project would be subject to applicable CBC regulations and provisions, as adopted in Chapter 16.04 of the City’s 9 City of Cupertino. General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning Draft EIR [4.5- 18]. June 18, 2014. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 January 2018 Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. e. The proposed project would connect to the City’s existing sewer system and would not require the use of a septic tank or other alternative waste water disposal method. Therefore, no impact would occur related to having soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternate wastewater disposal systems. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 33 January 2018 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?     b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gasses?     a,b. Emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on earth. An individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts. Implementation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities (electricity and natural gas), water usage, wastewater generation, and the generation of solid waste. The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e/yr). A number of regulations currently exist related to GHG emissions, predominantly Assembly Bill (AB 32), Executive Order S-3-05, and Senate Bill (SB 32). AB 32 sets forth a statewide GHG emissions reduction target of 1990 levels by 2020. Executive Order S-3- 05 sets forth a transitional reduction target of 2000 levels by 2010, the same target as AB 32 of 1990 levels by 2020, and further builds upon the AB 32 target by requiring a reduction to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. SB 32 also builds upon AB 32 and sets forth a transitional reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. In order to implement the statewide GHG emissions reduction targets, local jurisdictions are encouraged to prepare and adopt area-specific GHG reduction plans and/or thresholds of significance for GHG emissions. A discussion of the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP), as well as applicable BAAQMD thresholds related to GHG emissions, is provided below. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 January 2018 Climate Action Plan As a means of achieving the statewide GHG emissions reduction goals, the City has adopted a CAP. The targets are consistent with statewide goals. In addition, the CAP includes a number of reduction measures intended to be implemented by the City in order to accomplish the reduction goals. The emissions reduction strategies developed by the City follows the BAAQMD’s CEQA Guidelines and the corresponding criteria for a Qualified Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Program as defined by the BAAQMD. Because the provisions included in the CAP mirror the elements required per Section 15.183.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, the CAP is consistent with existing State regulations related to GHG emissions, as well as BAAQMD thresholds of significance. It should be noted that a quantitative threshold for GHG emissions for individual development projects has not been established by the City or set forth in the CAP. The GHG inventory contained in the City’s CAP was derived based on the land use designations and associated densities defined in the City’s General Plan. The proposed project would be consistent with the project site’s existing General Plan land use designation, and would not modify the type of use previously anticipated for the site by the City. It should be noted that the project would result in a slight increase in development intensity relative to existing site uses; however, associated increases in GHG emissions related to such would not be substantial. BAAQMD Thresholds The proposed project is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD threshold of significance for project-level operational GHG emissions is 1,100 MTCO2e/yr. BAAQMD’s approach to developing a threshold of significance for GHG emissions is to identify the emissions level for which a project would not be expected to substantially conflict with existing California legislation adopted to reduce statewide GHG emissions needed to move towards climate stabilization. If a project would generate GHG emissions above the threshold level, the project would be considered to generate significant GHG emissions and conflict with applicable GHG regulations. The proposed project’s estimated construction and operational GHG emissions were quantified using CalEEMod, using the same assumptions as presented in the Air Quality section of this IS/MND. The proposed project’s required compliance with the current California Building Energy Efficiency Standards Code was assumed in the modeling. In addition, the CO2 intensity factor within the model was adjusted to reflect the Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s anticipated progress towards statewide renewable portfolio standard goals. All CalEEMod results are included as an appendix to this IS/MND. Based on the results of the modeling, the project would result in total construction emissions of approximately 78.99 MTCO2e/yr. While neither the City nor BAAQMD has established GHG emissions thresholds for construction, construction emissions associated with the proposed project would be far below the BAAQMD’s adopted operational threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e/yr. Construction-related GHG emissions are a one-time Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 35 January 2018 release and are, therefore, not typically expected to generate a significant contribution to global climate change, as global climate change is inherently a cumulative effect that occurs over a long period of time. Furthermore, construction activity associated with the proposed project would occur over a short duration and be limited in scope. The project’s estimated operational emissions are summarized in Table 4 below. As shown in the table, the proposed project would result in operational GHG emissions well below the 1,100 MTCO2e/yr threshold. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in operational impacts related to GHG emissions. Table 4 Project Operational GHG Emissions Emission Source Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/yr) Area 0.36 Energy 7.53 Mobile 18.84 Solid Waste 1.27 Water 0.36 TOTAL ANNUAL GHG EMISSIONS 28.36 Source: CalEEMod, November 2017. Conclusion Based on the above, the proposed project would be consistent with the City’s adopted CAP. In addition, the estimated annual operational and construction GHG emissions would be below the applicable BAAQMD thresholds of significance. As such, the proposed project would not be considered to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, or conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 January 2018 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?     b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment?     c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?     d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?     e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?     h. Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?     Discussion a. Residential land uses are not typically associated with the routine transport, use, disposal, or generation of substantial amounts of hazardous materials. Future residents may use common household cleaning products, fertilizers, and herbicides on-site, any of which could contain potentially hazardous chemicals; however, such products would be expected to be used in accordance with label instructions. Due to the regulations governing use of such products and the amount that would be used on the site, routine use of such products would not represent a substantial risk to public health or the environment. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 37 January 2018 routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. The following discussion includes an analysis of hazardous and toxic materials that could be used on the proposed project site during construction activities, as well as existing hazardous materials known to be present on the site. Construction Equipment Construction activities associated with the proposed project would involve the use of heavy equipment, which would contain fuels and oils, and various other products such as concrete, paints, and adhesives. Small quantities of potentially toxic substances (e.g., petroleum and other chemicals used to operate and maintain construction equipment) would be used at the project site and transported to and from the site during construction. However, the project contractor would be required to comply with all California Health and Safety Codes and local City and County ordinances regulating the handling, storage, and transportation of hazardous and toxic materials. Compliance with such regulations would ensure that the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment during construction activities, particularly associated with construction equipment. Existing Soil Contamination A Phase I ESA was prepared for the proposed project by PIERS Environmental Services in July 2017.10 The Phase I ESA did not reveal evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), Historical RECs (HRECs), or Controlled RECs (CRECs). As discussed previously, the proposed project site has historically been used for agricultural purposes, particularly as an orchard. As such, pesticides and herbicides may have been used on the site. To comply with the City of Cupertino Planning Department requirements, and to investigate any residual effects of the former use of the project site as an orchard, a Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation (Phase II) was prepared for the proposed project by PIERS Environmental Services.11 As part of the Phase II, and in accordance with DTSC guidelines for sampling for agricultural chemicals, four soil samples were collected on-site on August 10, 2017 and analyzed for organochlorine pesticides (including, but not limited to, chlordane, a-Chlordane, g-Chlordane, p, p-DDD, p, p-DDE, p, p-DDT, dieldrin, and heptachlor), arsenic, and lead. The soil samples were located in future landscape areas, as the landscape areas would not be covered by impervious surfaces and, as a result, exposure to soil contaminants in such areas could occur. Concentrations of organochlorides pesticides, arsenic, and lead were compared to the applicable Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs), which are the concentrations of contaminants in soils and groundwater established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) used to determine the 10 PIERS Environmental Services. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California 95014. July 17, 2017. 11 PIERS Environmental Services. Report of Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California 95014. August 19, 2017. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 38 January 2018 relative risks to human health and the environment. Generally, the presence of a chemical in soil or groundwater at concentrations below the corresponding ESL can be assumed to not pose a significant threat to human health or the environment. The ESLs for soil differentiate between residential and commercial usage, although in some cases the values are the same. The only organochlorine pesticide detected above the residential ESL of 0.48 parts per million (ppm), was chlordane, which was detected in two soil samples (S1 and S2) at concentrations ranging up to 2.3 ppm at a depth of 0.4 feet.12 Although arsenic was detected in all four soil samples at concentrations ranging between 1.2 ppm and 5.4 ppm, which exceeds the residential ESL of 0.067 ppm, the concentrations are within the range of naturally-occurring background concentrations (0.6 ppm to 11 ppm) that are typical for Bay Area soils. Lead was detected in all four soil samples at concentrations ranging up to 15 ppm, which is below the residential ESL of 80 ppm, and in the range of, or below, naturally-occurring background concentrations. In order to better characterize the vertical extent of the soil contamination, PIERS Environmental Services conducted further soil sampling and analysis at the same sample points at a depth of 0.5 feet below grade. According to the addendum prepared by PIERS Environmental Services on January 8, 2018, the results of the additional soil sampling determined that the concentration for all contaminants was below the relative ESL at a depth of 0.5 feet (or six inches). While the reported chlordane levels in the two samples are above the residential ESLs, they are below the construction worker ESL of 14 mg/kg, thereby alleviating short duration construction worker exposure concerns. However, based on the above, future occupants could be exposed to soil contaminants. Therefore, the proposed project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment, particularly related to existing soil contamination at the site. Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paint Asbestos is the name for a group of naturally occurring silicate minerals that are considered to be “fibrous” and, through processing, can be separated into smaller and smaller fibers. The fibers are strong, durable, chemical resistant, and resistant to heat and fire. They are also long, thin, and flexible, such that they can be woven into cloth. Because of the above qualities, asbestos was considered an ideal product and has been used in thousands of consumer, industrial, maritime, automotive, scientific, and building products. However, later discoveries found that, when inhaled, the material caused serious illness. For buildings constructed prior to 1980, the Code of Federal Regulations (29 CFR 1926.1101) states that all thermal system insulation (boiler insulation, pipe lagging, and related materials) and surface materials must be designated as “presumed asbestos- containing material” unless proven otherwise through sampling in accordance with the standards of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act. Because the existing residence 12 PIERS Environmental Services. Addendum to Report of Subsurface Investigation and Transmittal of Additional Results, 22561 Alcalde Road, Cupertino, California. January 8, 2018. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 39 January 2018 was built prior to 1980, the potential exists that asbestos-containing materials were used in the construction of the on-site residence. Lead-based paint (LBP) is defined by federal guidelines as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has one milligram of lead per square centimeter or greater. Lead is a highly toxic material that may cause a range of serious illnesses, and in some cases death. In buildings constructed after 1978, the presence of LBP is unlikely. Structures built prior to 1978, and especially prior to the 1960s, are expected to contain LBP. As previously mentioned, the existing residence on the property was constructed in 1962, before the phase-out of LBPs. Therefore, the potential exists that LBPs are present in the on-site residence. Based on the age of the existing on-site residence, asbestos-containing materials and LBP are presumed to be present. The proposed project would include demolition of all on-site structures. Therefore, without implementation of the appropriate safety measures, the proposed project could potentially expose construction workers during demolition activities to LBP and asbestos-containing materials. Conclusion Based on the above, development of the proposed project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment, particularly associated with contaminated soils, asbestos-containing materials, and LBPs. Therefore, a potentially significant impact would occur. Mitigation Measure(s) Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce the above impact to a less-than-significant level. VIII-1. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the following measures shall be reflected on the project grading and foundation plans, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer: • Six inches of soil shall be removed within the proposed landscape areas along the northern and western boundaries of the project site. The aforementioned landscape areas shall subsequently be capped with a minimum of 0.5 feet of clean imported fill. • The top six inches of soils removed within the aforementioned landscape areas shall be off-hauled by a licensed hazardous waste contractor (Class A) and contractor personnel that have completed 40-hour OSHA hazardous training, and shall be disposed of appropriately in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations associated with hazardous waste. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 40 January 2018 The project applicant shall provide proof of implementation of the above measures to the Community Development Department. VIII-2. After demolition and removal of on-site structures and hardscapes, but prior to initiation of grading, the applicant shall conduct additional soil sampling within the previously inaccessible on-site areas to determine if the underlying soils contain contaminants in excess of the applicable Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) set by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The results of soil sampling shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to initiation of grading. If contaminants are not detected above applicable ESLs, then further mitigation is not required. If contaminants are detected above the applicable ESLs, then the soils shall be remediated by off-hauling to a licensed landfill facility. VIII-3. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for any on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and submit for review to the Community Development Department an asbestos and lead survey. If asbestos- containing materials or lead-containing materials are not discovered during the survey, further mitigation related to asbestos-containing materials or lead containing materials shall not be required. If asbestos- containing materials and/or lead-containing materials are discovered by the survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and Safety (Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal-OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training, engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos that is friable are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one (1) percent friable asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303. c. The proposed project would not be located within one-quarter mile of a school. Therefore, the project would have no impact related to hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 41 January 2018 d. The proposed project would not be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.13 Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment related to such, and no impact would occur. e,f. The nearest airport to the project site is the San Jose International Airport, located approximately 8.2 miles northeast of the site. As such, the proposed project site is not located within two miles of any public airports or private airstrips and does not fall within an airport land use plan area. Therefore, no impact related to a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area would occur related to such. g. The City of Cupertino Office of Emergency Services is responsible for coordinating agency response to disasters or other large‐scale emergencies in the City of Cupertino, with assistance from the Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services and the Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD). The Cupertino Emergency Operations Plan establishes policy direction for emergency planning, mitigation, response, and recovery activities within the City.14 Implementation of the proposed project would include widening of the Alcalde Road right- of-way by ten feet at the widest point (an approximately 370-square-foot area) along the project frontage, however, such modifications would not physically interfere with the Emergency Operations Plan, particularly with identified emergency routes. Furthermore, the proposed project would not include land uses or operations that could impair implementation of the plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not interfere with an emergency evacuation or response plan, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. h. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Fire and Resource Assessment Program, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.15 In addition, the site is currently developed, surrounded by existing development, and is not located adjacent to wildlands. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands, and a less-than-significant impact would occur. 13 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. Available at: http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. Accessed March 2017. 14 City of Cupertino. Emergency Operations Plan. September 2005. 15 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Santa Clara County, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. October 8, 2008. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 January 2018 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?     b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?     c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?     d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site?     e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?     f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?     g. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?     h. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?     i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.     j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?     Discussion a,f. The following section describes the project’s consistency with applicable water quality standards and waste discharge requirements during construction and operation. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 43 January 2018 Construction The proposed project site is currently developed with a residential use. As such, the site contains a substantial amount of impervious areas. Nonetheless, during the early stages of construction activities, topsoil would be exposed due to grading of the site. After grading and prior to overlaying the ground surface with impervious surfaces and structures, the potential exists for wind and water erosion to discharge sediment and/or urban pollutants into stormwater runoff, which could adversely affect water quality downstream. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) regulates stormwater discharges associated with construction activities where clearing, grading, or excavation results in a land disturbance of one or more acres. The project site is 19,562 square feet (0.45-acre), and, thus, construction activities would not be regulated by the SWRCB. However, the City’s Municipal Code requires applicants to provide and comply with an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Interim Plan). The Interim Plan shall show the location of erosion control measures and erosion control planting shall be shown on the site map/grading plan. The applicant shall provide the following information with respect to conditions existing on the site during land-disturbing or filling activities or stockpiling of soil: 1. A delineation and brief description of the measures to be undertaken to retain sediment on the site, including, but not limited to, the designs and specifications or berms and sediment detention basins, and a schedule for their maintenance and upkeep; 2. A delineation and brief description of the surface runoff and erosion control measures to be implemented, including, but not limited, to types and methods of applying mulches, and designs and specifications for diverters, dikes and drains, and a schedule for their maintenance and upkeep; 3. A delineation and brief description of the vegetative measures to be undertaken, including, but not limited to, seeding methods, and type, location and extent of preexisting and undisturbed vegetation types, and a schedule for maintenance and upkeep. Because the project would comply with the City’s interim erosion control requirements, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, or otherwise degrade water quality, during construction. Operation The proposed residential use would not involve operations typically associated with the generation or discharge of polluted water. Thus, typical operations on the project site would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, nor degrade water quality. However, the potential for urban runoff would be increased with the addition of impervious surfaces on the site, which could contain pollutants if the runoff comes into contact with vehicle fluids on parking surfaces and/or landscape fertilizers and herbicides prior to reaching downstream waters. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 44 January 2018 As of December 1, 2012, detached single-family homes that create or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface are required by the City of Cupertino to install one or more of the following design measures: • Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas (standard condition of approval, unless infeasible); • Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse; • Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas; • Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas; • Construct sidewalks, walkways and/or patios with permeable surface; or • Construct bike lanes, driveways and or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. As discussed previously, the proposed project would include a series of downspouts and storm drains that capture runoff created by impervious areas on the project site. Runoff from the downspouts would enter a six-inch perforated pipe continuing into a bubbler drain system that would collect and route the water onto vegetated areas in the front yards of the proposed residences. The proposed drainage system would satisfy City requirements by routing on-site runoff through vegetated areas prior to entering the City’s storm drain system. Therefore, during operation, the project would comply with all relevant water quality standards and waste discharge requirements, and, thus, would not degrade water quality during operation. Conclusion Based on the above, the project would comply with all applicable water quality and waste discharge regulations during construction and operation, and would not involve uses associated with the generation or discharge of polluted water. Therefore, a less-than- significant impact would occur related to a violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or degradation of water quality. b. As discussed previously, the project site is currently developed with an existing residence. The proposed project site would not substantially increase demand for water supplies associated with the site, including groundwater, and the proposed on-site drainage system would allow for stormwater to percolate into the underlying soils, contributing to the recharge of groundwater. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, and a less-than- significant impact would occur. c-e. The proposed project site is currently developed with an existing residence and other impervious surfaces such as a driveway, a concrete patio, and shed. As such, development of the proposed project would not result in a substantial increase in impervious surfaces or runoff from what currently exists on-site. In addition, as discussed above, the project would include a drainage system that would manage all on-site runoff without directly connecting to the City’s existing stormwater drainage system. Runoff entering the perforated drainage Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 45 January 2018 pipes and the bubbler drain system would be able to infiltrate the soil and erosion, siltation, and/or flooding would not occur. In conclusion, the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area in a manner which would result in erosion, siltation, or flooding on- or off-site, or create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Consequently, the proposed project would result in a less-than- significant impact related to such. g-i. According to the City’s General Plan,16 as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Number 06085C0204H,17 the proposed project site is located in Zone X, which is an area of minimal flood hazard, outside of the 100-year floodplain. As a result, the project would not place housing or structures within the 100-year floodplain, nor expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. Therefore, no impact would result. j. Tsunamis are defined as sea waves created by undersea fault movement, whereas a seiche is a long-wavelength, large-scale wave action set up in a closed body of water such as a lake or reservoir. Tsunamis typically affect coastlines and areas up to one-quarter mile inland. The project area is located over 20 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Due to the project’s distance from the coast, the project site would not be exposed to flooding risks associated with tsunamis. Seiches do not pose a risk to the proposed project, as the project site is not located in close proximity to any large closed bodies of water. Mudflows typically occur on steep, unstable slopes. Given that the proposed project site is relatively flat and not located on a slope, mudflows would not pose an issue. Based on the above, no impact would occur related to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. 16 City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040 [pg. E-5]. Adopted October 20, 2015. 17 Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA’s National Flood Hazard Layer (Official), Panel #06085C0208H. Available at: http://fema.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=cbe088e7c8704464aa0fc34eb99e7f30&exte nt=-122.05675800688134,37.31906767684711,-122.0534481609565,37.32047549983092. Accessed October 2017. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 46 January 2018 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Physically divide an established community?     b. Conflict with any applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?     c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan?     Discussion a. A project risks dividing an established community if the project would introduce infrastructure or alter land use so as to change the land use conditions in the surrounding community, or isolate an existing land use. The proposed project site currently contains a single-family residence, which would be demolished as part of the proposed project. Given that the proposed project would include redevelopment of the site with two new single- family residences, the proposed project would not alter the land use of the site. Accordingly, the proposed project would not change the land use conditions in the area or isolate an existing land use. In addition, the project would be consistent with the site’s existing zoning and General Plan land use designations. As such, the proposed project would not physically divide an established community and a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. The City of Cupertino General Plan designates the 19,562-square-foot site as Low/Medium Density (5-10 du/ac), and the site is currently zoned Single-Family Residential (R1-7.5). The proposed project would include division of the site into two approximately 8,892- square-foot lots and dedication of approximately 370 square feet of land to the City to allow for the widening of the Alcalde Road right-of-way along the project frontage. The two new lots would maintain the existing zoning and General Plan land use designations for the site, and would be consistent with Sections 19.28.050 and 19.28.060 of the City’s Municipal Code relating to zoning districts and site development regulations. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. As a result, the proposed project would result in a less- than-significant impact. c. As discussed previously, the project site is not located in an area with an approved HCP/NCCP. As a result, no impact would occur. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 47 January 2018 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?     b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?     Discussion a,b. The proposed project site is located in a developed area and is currently developed with residential use. According to the City’s General Plan, the project site is located in an area which is unsuitable for mineral extraction.18 Therefore, no impact to mineral resources would occur as a result of the proposed project. 18 City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040 [pg. ES-10]. Adopted October 20, 2015. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 January 2018 XII. NOISE. Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?     b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?     c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?     d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?     e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     Discussion a,c. The existing noise environment of the site is currently defined by traffic noise on Alcalde Road. Such traffic is primarily generated by the surrounding residences in the project vicinity, as well as the occupied single-family residence currently located on the project site. The proposed project would include demolition of the existing on-site structures and redevelopment of the site with two single-family two-story residences. The project could be considered to result in a potentially significant impact if the net increase in traffic generated by the proposed project would cause an exceedance of noise levels established in the City’s Municipal Code or an increase in the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. As discussed in the Transportation and Circulation section of this IS/MND, the proposed project would be anticipated to generate a total of 19 ADT. A total of 19 new vehicle trips spread over a 24-hour period would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Furthermore, approximately half of the trips generated by the project would replace trips currently generated by the occupied single-family residence on the project site. Therefore, given that the proposed project would not substantially increase the number of vehicle trips associated with the project site, the project would not result in the exposure of persons to Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 49 January 2018 or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in City of Cupertino Municipal Code, or substantially increase ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. Heavy-duty construction equipment would be used during construction of the proposed project (e.g., tractors, pavers, bulldozers). Such equipment has the potential to generate groundborne vibration. Levels of vibration include imperceptible vibrations at low levels, low rumbling and minor vibration at moderate levels, and structural or architectural damage at high levels. For structural damage, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) uses a vibration limit of 0.5 inches per second, peak particle velocity (in/sec, PPV) for buildings structurally sound and designed to modern engineering standards, and 0.2 in/sec PPV for buildings that are found to be structurally sound but where structural damage is a major concern. The threshold of 0.2 in/sec PPV is also used by Caltrans as the threshold for human annoyance caused by vibration. Although all surrounding structures are assumed to be structurally sound, the 0.2 in/sec PPV threshold offers a conservative value with regard to structural damage and is used as the threshold of significance for the analysis within this IS/MND. The primary vibration-generating activities associated with the project would occur during demolition of the existing on-site structures, construction of the two proposed single-family residences, and widening of the Alcalde Road right-of-way. Table 5 below presents typical vibration levels that could be expected from construction equipment at a distance of 25 feet. Table 5 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment PPV at 25 ft (in/sec) Large Bulldozer 0.089 Caisson drilling 0.089 Loaded trucks 0.076 Jackhammer 0.035 Small bulldozer 0.003 Source: Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, September 2013. The most significant source of ground-borne vibrations during project construction would be the use of large bulldozers, which, as shown above, would generate vibrations of approximately 0.089 in/sec PPV at a distance of 25 feet.19 The nearest buildings relative to the proposed project site are the existing single-family residences located to the north, east, and west of the site. The residences are situated approximately 15 feet at the closest point from the nearest proposed construction areas. Using the maximum vibration level anticipated during construction of 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet and adjusting for a distance of 15 feet,20 the maximum vibration levels anticipated at the nearest residences would be approximately 0.16 in/sec PPV during construction activities associated with the project, 19 California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration, Guidance Manual. September 2013. 20 California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration, Guidance Manual [Equation 12, pg. 37]. September 2013. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 50 January 2018 which would be below the applicable 0.2 in/sec PPV threshold. As such, groundborne vibrations associated with development on the project site would not damage any existing buildings. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary in nature and would be limited to normal daytime working hours in accordance with Section 10.48.053 of the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur related to exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. d. During demolition of the existing on-site structures, construction of the proposed residences, and widening of the Alcalde Road right-of-way, noise from such activities would temporarily add to the noise environment in the project vicinity. Noise would also be generated during the construction phase by truck traffic associated with transport of heavy materials and equipment to and from the project site. However, per Section 10.48.053 of the City’s Municipal Code, grading, construction, and demolition activities are permitted to exceed the City’s established noise limits during daytime hours provided that any piece of equipment involved in such activities has high-quality noise mufflers and abatement devices installed, is in good condition, and the activities meet certain established criteria. Compliance with the Municipal Code requirements would be verified as part of the City’s standard conditions of approval. Furthermore, noise associated with construction activities would be temporary, would occur intermittently throughout implementation of the proposed project, and would occur on a relatively small scale. Thus, while demolition and construction activities associated with the project could result in temporary increases in noise levels at nearby noise-sensitive receptors, such increases would not be substantial, would be minimized through compliance with the City’s Municipal Code, and would be typical of residential construction activities. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur. e,f. The project site is located approximately 8.2 miles southwest of the nearest airport, which is the San Jose International Airport. Given the distance between the airport and the project site, noise levels resulting from aircraft traffic at the nearest airport would be negligible at the proposed project site. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 51 January 2018 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)?     b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     Discussion a. The proposed project would include the demolition of the existing on-site residence and the construction of two new single-family homes. The increase of one home would not result in a substantial increase in population, and, thus, the project would not be considered to induce substantial population growth through the construction of new homes. In addition, the project would be consistent with the existing zoning and General Plan land use designations for the site. Consequently, a less-than-significant impact would occur with regard to the project inducing substantial population growth. b,c. The proposed project currently contains a single-family residence. The on-site structure would be demolished as part of the proposed project, and the site would be redeveloped with two new single-family residences. Given that the project would provide new housing to replace the existing residence, the proposed project would not displace a substantial number of existing housing or people and would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 52 January 2018 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less- Than-Significant Impact No Impact a. Fire protection?     b. Police protection?     c. Schools?     d. Parks?     e. Other Public Facilities?     Discussion a. Fire protection services to the project area are provided by the Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD), which serves Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, and Saratoga. The SCCFD operates 17 fire stations; the Cupertino Fire Station, located at 20215 Stevens Creek Boulevard, currently serves the project site. The SCCFD would continue to provide service following construction of the proposed project. Given that the proposed project would be consistent with the existing land uses on the site and the General Plan land use designation for the site, provision of fire protection services to the project site has been previously anticipated by the City. In addition, demand for fire protection services would not substantially increase, as the site is currently developed with a residential use. Per Section 16.40.060 of the City’s Municipal Code, the proposed project would be required to pay applicable fire protection fees to the SCCFD. In addition, the proposed residential buildings would be constructed in accordance with the fire protection requirements of the 2016 California Fire Code, which contain provisions to minimize fire hazard risks. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact related to the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. b. The City of Cupertino contracts with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office (Sheriff’s Office) and the West Valley Patrol Division for police protection services. The West Valley Patrol Division is headquartered at the Westside Sheriff’s Substation at 1601 South De Anza Boulevard in Cupertino. Given that the proposed project site is already developed with a residential use and provided with police protection services, and the project would be consistent with the City’s General Plan land use designation, the project would not substantially increase the demand for police protection services at the site from what currently occurs or what has been anticipated by the City for the site. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact related to the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 53 January 2018 c. Public schools in the City of Cupertino are managed by the Cupertino Union School District (CUSD) and the Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD). The proposed project would be required to pay the school impact fees specified in the City’s General Plan.21 As noted in the General Plan, in accordance with Senate Bill 50, school impact mitigation fees are presumed to fully mitigate any school impacts associated with development. Because the project applicant would be required to pay the applicable school impact fees, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact regarding an increase in demand for schools. d,e. The City of Cupertino assesses park maintenance fees for new residential development based on the density of the proposed development. Given that the proposed project would include the construction of single-family housing, the project applicant would be required to pay the appropriate park maintenance fee to the City. Pursuant to Section 14.05.060 of the City’s Municipal Code, the final amount of the fee would be determined by the Director of Public Works. The in-lieu fees would fund improvements to and expansion of park facilities within the City. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than- significant impact related to the need for new or physically altered parks or other public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts. 21 City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040 [pg. B-83]. Adopted October 20, 2015. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 54 January 2018 XV. RECREATION. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less- Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?     b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?     Discussion a,b. The proposed project would include the construction of two new single-family homes. Residents of the proposed homes would likely use existing neighborhood, regional, parks and/or other recreational facilities. However, given that the project site is currently developed with a residential use, the proposed project would not be anticipated to substantially increase the demand for parks or other recreational facilities associated with the site. In addition, development of the site with residential uses has been previously anticipated in the City’s General Plan. As discussed in Section XIV, Public Services, above, the project applicant would be required to pay applicable park maintenance fees to the City. Therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to result in substantial physical deterioration of any existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities, and would not require the construction or expansion of facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 55 January 2018 XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?     b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?     c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?     d. Substantially increase hazards due to design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?     e. Result in inadequate emergency access?     f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?     Discussion a,b. The Institute of Traffic Engineer’s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used to estimate weekday AM, PM, and daily trip generation forecasts for the proposed project based on the proposed single-family residential land use.22 As shown in Table 6 below, implementation of the proposed project would be expected to result in a total of 19 ADT, with two trips occurring during the AM peak hour and two trips occurring during the PM peak hour. Table 6 Weekday Project Trip Generation Rates and Estimates Units Rate Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate In Out Total Rate In Out Total 2 9.52 19 0.75 1 1 2 1.00 1 1 2 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012. 22 Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition. September 2012. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 56 January 2018 According to the Santa Clara VTA, projects anticipated to generate fewer than 100 peak hour trips are not subject to review by the VTA.23 Because the project would generate fewer than 100 peak hour trips, preparation of a traffic impact study for the proposed project is not required and the project is not subject to review by the VTA. Because the project would result in less than 100 peak hour trips, and traffic associated with buildout of the site has been previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR, the project would not be expected to adversely impact levels of service at nearby signalized intersections or roadways. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, and would not conflict with the applicable CMP. Consequently, a less-than-significant impact would occur. c. The proposed project is not located near an airport and does not include any improvements to airports or a change in air traffic patterns. The nearest airport to the site is San Jose International Airport, located approximately 8.2 miles northeast of the site. Therefore, because the proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in air traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks, no impact would occur. d,e. The proposed project would include widening of the Alcalde Road right-of-way by ten feet at the widest point (an approximately 370-square-foot area) along the project frontage, which would be dedicated to the City. Both of the proposed single-family residences would include paved driveways, which would connect to the widened roadway. Thus, adequate emergency access would be provided to the site. In addition, as previously mentioned, sidewalks do not currently exist along the frontage of the project site; however, implementation of the proposed project would include the addition of a sidewalk that would help to improve the currently discontinuous sidewalks along Alcalde Road. Thus, the addition of a sidewalk along the frontage of the project site would increase the pedestrian network in the project vicinity, and, thus, would increase access to the project site. Residential uses associated with the proposed project would be considered consistent and compatible with the existing residential development in the surrounding area. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to design features. In addition, emergency vehicles would have reasonable access to the proposed residences from the existing roadways and project frontage. Based on the above, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to design features or incompatible uses, and emergency access to the site would be adequate. Therefore, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact. f. The proposed project site is located in a residential subdivision. While bike lanes are not present on the surrounding roadway network, bicycle travel in the project vicinity remains a viable transportation option due to the low levels of traffic experienced on the neighborhood roadways. As noted above, the proposed project would include the provision of a sidewalk at the project frontage, which would improve the pedestrian network in the 23 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. 2013 Congestion Management Program [pg. 12]. October 2013. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 57 January 2018 area. Thus, the project would be consistent with Policy M-3.2 of the City’s General Plan, which requires new development and redevelopment to increase pedestrian connectivity. The nearest transit stop relative to the project site is located at the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and South Foothill Boulevard, approximately less than half a mile north of the project site. Thus, residents of the proposed single-family homes would be provided with reasonable access to the City’s public transportation system. Given the presence of existing transit and pedestrian facilities, and incorporation of a new sidewalk along the project frontage, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact with respect to conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or with respect to degradation of such facilities. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 January 2018 XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less- Than-Significant Impact No Impact a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?     b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.     Discussion a,b. As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, of this IS/MND, the proposed project site does not contain any existing permanent structures or any other known resources listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, NRHP, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), and does not contain known resources that could be considered historic pursuant to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. Furthermore, the potential for unrecorded Native American resources to exist within the project site is relatively low based on the highly- disturbed nature of the site, and Native American resources have not been identified within the vicinity of the project site. Given that the project would be required to comply with the City’s standard conditions of approval regarding cultural resources, construction of the proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, and a less-than-significant impact to tribal cultural resources could occur. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 59 January 2018 XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?     b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?     c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?     d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?     e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?     f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?     g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?     Discussion a,b,e. Wastewater service at the proposed project site would be provided by the Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD). The proposed project would connect to the CSD’s existing sanitary sewer system by way of connections to existing sewer lines in Alcalde Road. The CSD collection system directs wastewater to the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SCWPCP), a joint powers authority. The project area is currently provided sewer services by the CSD, including the existing on-site residence. The proposed project would demolish the existing residence and construct two new single-family residences. The net increase of one residence on the project site would not substantially increase the demand for wastewater services associated with the site and would not affect the available capacity of the SJ/SCWPCP. Furthermore, wastewater generation associated with buildout of the project site has been anticipated by the City, as the project would be consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation of the site. In addition, the proposed project would involve typical household wastewater generation, which would not have the potential to exceed any wastewater Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 60 January 2018 treatment requirements of the RWQCB. Based on the above, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to wastewater. c. As discussed in further detail in Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this IS/MND, the proposed project would not include direct connections to the City’s existing stormwater drainage facilities, and, thus, would not necessitate the expansion of such facilities. Rather, runoff from the downspouts would enter a new six-inch perforated pipe continuing into a bubbler drain system that would collect and route the water onto vegetated areas in the front yard areas of the proposed residences. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact with respect to requiring or resulting in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. d. Water service to the proposed project site is currently provided under contract with San Jose Water. The proposed project would connect to existing water supply infrastructure located in Alcalde Road. The proposed project would demolish the existing on-site residence and construct two new single-family residences. The net increase of one residence on the project site would not substantially increase the demand for water supplies associated with the site. In addition, the proposed project would be consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation of the site, and, thus, the City has previously anticipated the demand for water supplies associated with buildout of the site. Therefore, sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the proposed project from existing entitlements and resources, and new or expanded entitlements would not be needed. In addition, the project would not necessitate the construction of new water supply facilities. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur. f,g. The City contracts with Recology South Bay (Recology) for solid waste collection services. All non-hazardous solid waste collected under the Recology franchise agreement is taken to Newby Island Sanitary Landfill for processing. Under the agreement recyclable materials also are handled by Recology. Of the 27,593 tons of solid waste disposed in 2012, 25,440 tons, or 92 percent was disposed of at the Newby Island Landfill. The Monterey Peninsula Landfill, the Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill and the Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility accepted the next highest amounts of waste from Cupertino, respectively receiving 1,260 tons (4.6 percent of total), 321 tons (1.2 percent) and 238 tons (0.9 percent) of all waste. Per the General Plan EIR, sufficient landfill capacity is available to serve buildout of the General Plan. The proposed project site is currently developed with a residential use and is designated as Low/Medium Density Residential in the City’s General Plan. The proposed project would demolish the existing on-site residence and construct two new single-family residences. The net increase of one residence on the project site would not substantially increase the solid waste generation associated with the site. In addition, the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. As such, generation of solid waste associated with the project site has been previously anticipated by the City. Based on the above, the project would not increase solid waste generation such that the capacity of any landfills serving the City would be exceeded. In addition, construction and Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 61 January 2018 any demolition debris associated with the project would be subject to Chapter 16.72 of the City’s Municipal Code, which requires that a minimum of 60 percent of construction and demolition debris be diverted from a landfill. Therefore, the proposed project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs and would comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Accordingly, a less-than-significant impact would occur. Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 January 2018 XIX. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Significant Impact Less-Than- Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?     b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?     c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?     Discussion a. As described throughout this IS/MND, impacts related to special-status plants and cultural resources would be less than significant. In addition, potential impacts related to reducing the habitat for nesting migratory birds would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of the mitigation measures required by this IS/MND, as well as compliance with General Plan policies and all applicable sections of the Municipal Code. As such, development of the proposed project would not: 1) degrade the quality of the environment; 2) substantially reduce or impact the habitat of fish or wildlife species; 3) cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels; 4) threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; 5) reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or 6) eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur. b. The proposed project in conjunction with other development within the City of Cupertino could incrementally contribute to cumulative impacts in the area. However, as demonstrated in this IS/MND, all potential environmental impacts that could occur as a result of project implementation would be reduced to a less-than-significant level with implementation of project-specific mitigation measures, as well as compliance with applicable General Plan policies and Municipal Code standards. In addition, the site has been anticipated by the City for residential development. Thus, buildout of the site with residential uses was considered in the cumulative analysis of buildout of the General Plan. When viewed in conjunction with other closely related past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects, development of the proposed project would not substantially Alcalde Road Lot Split Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 63 January 2018 contribute to cumulative impacts in the City of Cupertino, and the project’s cumulative impact would be less than significant. c. As described in this IS/MND, implementation of the proposed project could result in potential impacts related to existing soil contamination at the site. However, the proposed project would implement the project-specific mitigation measures within this IS/MND, as well as applicable General Plan policies, which would ensure that any potential direct or indirect effects to human beings would be reduced to less-than-significant levels. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact. APPENDIX AIR QUALITY AND GHG MODELING RESULTS Project Characteristics - Intensity Factors for CO2 adjusted based on PG&E RPS reductions Land Use - Applicant provided Construction Phase - Applicant provided Grading - Applicant provided Demolition - Applicant provided Vehicle Trips - Based on ITE rate (Single Family Homes, 210) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 2.00 Dwelling Unit 0.45 3,600.00 6 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 409.81 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Alcalde Road Lot Split Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 1 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/21/2018 11/28/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/7/2018 11/14/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/14/2018 6/27/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/15/2018 7/12/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/21/2018 6/28/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2018 6/21/2018 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.45 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 363.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 130.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.65 0.45 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 409.81 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 9.52 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 9.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 2 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.1046 0.7497 0.5547 8.7000e- 004 5.5200e- 003 0.0483 0.0538 1.3600e- 003 0.0451 0.0465 0.0000 78.4962 78.4962 0.0197 0.0000 78.9878 Maximum 0.1046 0.7497 0.5547 8.7000e- 004 5.5200e- 003 0.0483 0.0538 1.3600e- 003 0.0451 0.0465 0.0000 78.4962 78.4962 0.0197 0.0000 78.9878 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.1046 0.7497 0.5547 8.7000e- 004 5.5200e- 003 0.0483 0.0538 1.3600e- 003 0.0451 0.0465 0.0000 78.4961 78.4961 0.0197 0.0000 78.9877 Maximum 0.1046 0.7497 0.5547 8.7000e- 004 5.5200e- 003 0.0483 0.0538 1.3600e- 003 0.0451 0.0465 0.0000 78.4961 78.4961 0.0197 0.0000 78.9877 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 3 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0288 4.3000e- 004 0.0321 4.0000e- 005 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 0.2542 0.0867 0.3409 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3578 Energy 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.4848 7.4848 3.0000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 7.5298 Mobile 6.0800e- 003 0.0287 0.0686 2.1000e- 004 0.0164 2.6000e- 004 0.0166 4.4000e- 003 2.5000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 0.0000 18.8212 18.8212 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 18.8408 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5115 0.0000 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0413 0.1845 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Total 0.0354 0.0331 0.1023 2.7000e- 004 0.0164 3.1300e- 003 0.0195 4.4000e- 003 3.1200e- 003 7.5100e- 003 0.8071 26.5772 27.3843 0.0361 2.4000e- 004 28.3588 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 6-4-2018 9-3-2018 0.4626 0.4626 2 9-4-2018 9-30-2018 0.1440 0.1440 Highest 0.4626 0.4626 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 4 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0288 4.3000e- 004 0.0321 4.0000e- 005 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 0.2542 0.0867 0.3409 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3578 Energy 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.4848 7.4848 3.0000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 7.5298 Mobile 6.0800e- 003 0.0287 0.0686 2.1000e- 004 0.0164 2.6000e- 004 0.0166 4.4000e- 003 2.5000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 0.0000 18.8212 18.8212 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 18.8408 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5115 0.0000 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0413 0.1845 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Total 0.0354 0.0331 0.1023 2.7000e- 004 0.0164 3.1300e- 003 0.0195 4.4000e- 003 3.1200e- 003 7.5100e- 003 0.8071 26.5772 27.3843 0.0361 2.4000e- 004 28.3588 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 5 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 6/4/2018 6/15/2018 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/16/2018 6/18/2018 5 1 3 Grading Grading 6/19/2018 6/20/2018 5 2 4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/28/2018 11/14/2018 5 100 5 Paving Paving 6/21/2018 6/27/2018 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/12/2018 11/28/2018 5 100 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 7,290; Residential Outdoor: 2,430; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.45 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 6 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 23.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 62.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 7 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.5400e- 003 0.0000 2.5400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.3200e- 003 0.0472 0.0389 6.0000e- 005 3.1100e- 003 3.1100e- 003 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 5.3041 5.3041 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 5.3297 Total 5.3200e- 003 0.0472 0.0389 6.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 3.1100e- 003 5.6500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 2.9700e- 003 3.3500e- 003 0.0000 5.3041 5.3041 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 5.3297 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 8 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.1000e- 004 3.7900e- 003 7.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8999 0.8999 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9011 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5400e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3684 0.3684 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3687 Total 3.1000e- 004 3.9400e- 003 2.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.2684 1.2684 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2698 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.5400e- 003 0.0000 2.5400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.3200e- 003 0.0472 0.0389 6.0000e- 005 3.1100e- 003 3.1100e- 003 2.9700e- 003 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 5.3041 5.3041 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 5.3296 Total 5.3200e- 003 0.0472 0.0389 6.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 3.1100e- 003 5.6500e- 003 3.8000e- 004 2.9700e- 003 3.3500e- 003 0.0000 5.3041 5.3041 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 5.3296 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 9 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.1000e- 004 3.7900e- 003 7.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8999 0.8999 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9011 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5400e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3684 0.3684 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3687 Total 3.1000e- 004 3.9400e- 003 2.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.2684 1.2684 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2698 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.9000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.4458 0.4458 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4492 Total 3.9000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 4.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.4458 0.4458 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4492 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 10 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 3.0000e- 004 0.0102 1.9500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 5.6000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.4259 2.4259 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4291 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0184 0.0184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0184 Total 3.1000e- 004 0.0102 2.0300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.4443 2.4443 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4475 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.9000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.4458 0.4458 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4492 Total 3.9000e- 004 4.8800e- 003 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 4.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.4458 0.4458 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4492 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 11 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 3.0000e- 004 0.0102 1.9500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 5.6000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.4259 2.4259 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4291 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0184 0.0184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0184 Total 3.1000e- 004 0.0102 2.0300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 5.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.4443 2.4443 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.4475 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 7.5000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0600e- 003 9.4300e- 003 7.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.2000e- 004 6.2000e- 004 5.9000e- 004 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.0608 1.0608 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0659 Total 1.0600e- 003 9.4300e- 003 7.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.5000e- 004 6.2000e- 004 1.3700e- 003 4.1000e- 004 5.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 1.0608 1.0608 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0659 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 12 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0737 0.0737 0.0000 0.0000 0.0737 Total 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0737 0.0737 0.0000 0.0000 0.0737 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 7.5000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0600e- 003 9.4300e- 003 7.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.2000e- 004 6.2000e- 004 5.9000e- 004 5.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.0608 1.0608 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0659 Total 1.0600e- 003 9.4300e- 003 7.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.5000e- 004 6.2000e- 004 1.3700e- 003 4.1000e- 004 5.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 1.0608 1.0608 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0659 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 13 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0737 0.0737 0.0000 0.0000 0.0737 Total 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0737 0.0737 0.0000 0.0000 0.0737 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0542 0.5516 0.3876 5.7000e- 004 0.0354 0.0354 0.0326 0.0326 0.0000 52.0058 52.0058 0.0162 0.0000 52.4106 Total 0.0542 0.5516 0.3876 5.7000e- 004 0.0354 0.0354 0.0326 0.0326 0.0000 52.0058 52.0058 0.0162 0.0000 52.4106 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 14 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5400e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3684 0.3684 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3687 Total 2.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5400e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3684 0.3684 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3687 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0542 0.5516 0.3876 5.7000e- 004 0.0354 0.0354 0.0326 0.0326 0.0000 52.0058 52.0058 0.0162 0.0000 52.4105 Total 0.0542 0.5516 0.3876 5.7000e- 004 0.0354 0.0354 0.0326 0.0326 0.0000 52.0058 52.0058 0.0162 0.0000 52.4105 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 15 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5400e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3684 0.3684 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3687 Total 2.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5400e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3684 0.3684 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3687 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 2.3000e- 003 0.0219 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.4270 2.4270 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.4441 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.3000e- 003 0.0219 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.4270 2.4270 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.4441 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 16 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.3900e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.3900e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 2.3000e- 003 0.0219 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.4270 2.4270 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.4441 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.3000e- 003 0.0219 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.4270 2.4270 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.4441 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 17 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.3900e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.3900e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0149 0.1003 0.0927 1.5000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 0.0000 12.7663 12.7663 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 12.7966 Total 0.0403 0.1003 0.0927 1.5000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 0.0000 12.7663 12.7663 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 12.7966 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 18 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0149 0.1003 0.0927 1.5000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 0.0000 12.7663 12.7663 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 12.7966 Total 0.0403 0.1003 0.0927 1.5000e- 004 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 7.5300e- 003 0.0000 12.7663 12.7663 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 12.7966 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 19 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 20 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 6.0800e- 003 0.0287 0.0686 2.1000e- 004 0.0164 2.6000e- 004 0.0166 4.4000e- 003 2.5000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 0.0000 18.8212 18.8212 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 18.8408 Unmitigated 6.0800e- 003 0.0287 0.0686 2.1000e- 004 0.0164 2.6000e- 004 0.0166 4.4000e- 003 2.5000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 0.0000 18.8212 18.8212 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 18.8408 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 19.04 19.04 19.04 43,975 43,975 Total 19.04 19.04 19.04 43,975 43,975 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.570523 0.041853 0.194077 0.115893 0.018544 0.005373 0.016909 0.024079 0.002502 0.002562 0.005975 0.000872 0.000837 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 21 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9677 2.9677 2.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.9859 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9677 2.9677 2.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.9859 NaturalGas Mitigated 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.5171 4.5171 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 4.5440 NaturalGas Unmitigated 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.5171 4.5171 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 4.5440 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 84647.5 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.5171 4.5171 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 4.5440 Total 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.5171 4.5171 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 4.5440 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 22 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 84647.5 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.5171 4.5171 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 4.5440 Total 4.6000e- 004 3.9000e- 003 1.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.5171 4.5171 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 4.5440 Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 15965 2.9677 2.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.9859 Total 2.9677 2.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.9859 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 23 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0288 4.3000e- 004 0.0321 4.0000e- 005 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 0.2542 0.0867 0.3409 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3578 Unmitigated 0.0288 4.3000e- 004 0.0321 4.0000e- 005 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 0.2542 0.0867 0.3409 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3578 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Single Family Housing 15965 2.9677 2.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.9859 Total 2.9677 2.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.9859 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 24 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 2.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0118 2.6000e- 004 0.0171 4.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 0.2542 0.0624 0.3166 4.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3330 Landscaping 4.6000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0149 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0243 0.0243 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0249 Total 0.0288 4.3000e- 004 0.0321 4.0000e- 005 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 0.2542 0.0867 0.3409 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3578 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 25 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 2.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0118 2.6000e- 004 0.0171 4.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 2.4700e- 003 0.2542 0.0624 0.3166 4.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3330 Landscaping 4.6000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0149 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0243 0.0243 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0249 Total 0.0288 4.3000e- 004 0.0321 4.0000e- 005 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 2.5500e- 003 0.2542 0.0867 0.3409 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.3578 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 26 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Unmitigated 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Single Family Housing 0.130308 / 0.0821507 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Total 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 27 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Single Family Housing 0.130308 / 0.0821507 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Total 0.2259 4.2600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 0.3630 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Unmitigated 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Category/Year CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 28 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Single Family Housing 2.52 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Total 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Single Family Housing 2.52 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Total 0.5115 0.0302 0.0000 1.2673 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 29 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 11.0 Vegetation 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:58 AMPage 30 of 30 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - Intensity Factors for CO2 adjusted based on PG&E RPS reductions Land Use - Applicant provided Construction Phase - Applicant provided Grading - Applicant provided Demolition - Applicant provided Vehicle Trips - Based on ITE rate (Single Family Homes, 210) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 2.00 Dwelling Unit 0.45 3,600.00 6 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 409.81 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Alcalde Road Lot Split Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 1 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/21/2018 11/28/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/7/2018 11/14/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/14/2018 6/27/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/15/2018 7/12/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/21/2018 6/28/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2018 6/21/2018 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.45 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 363.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 130.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.65 0.45 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 409.81 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 9.52 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 9.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 2 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 1.8945 29.7849 9.6389 0.0607 1.6571 0.8593 2.1559 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,411.069 1 6,411.069 1 0.5838 0.0000 6,425.663 6 Maximum 1.8945 29.7849 9.6389 0.0607 1.6571 0.8593 2.1559 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,411.069 1 6,411.069 1 0.5838 0.0000 6,425.663 6 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 1.8945 29.7849 9.6389 0.0607 1.6571 0.8593 2.1559 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,411.069 1 6,411.069 1 0.5838 0.0000 6,425.663 6 Maximum 1.8945 29.7849 9.6389 0.0607 1.6571 0.8593 2.1559 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,411.069 1 6,411.069 1 0.5838 0.0000 6,425.663 6 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 3 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Energy 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Mobile 0.0380 0.1524 0.3891 1.2000e- 003 0.0935 1.4400e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3600e- 003 0.0264 120.7671 120.7671 4.7800e- 003 120.8866 Total 2.2091 0.2156 3.2446 6.4000e- 003 0.0935 0.3831 0.4766 0.0250 0.3831 0.4081 40.7567 160.7008 201.4575 0.0560 3.3800e- 003 203.8632 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Energy 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Mobile 0.0380 0.1524 0.3891 1.2000e- 003 0.0935 1.4400e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3600e- 003 0.0264 120.7671 120.7671 4.7800e- 003 120.8866 Total 2.2091 0.2156 3.2446 6.4000e- 003 0.0935 0.3831 0.4766 0.0250 0.3831 0.4081 40.7567 160.7008 201.4575 0.0560 3.3800e- 003 203.8632 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 4 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 6/4/2018 6/15/2018 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/16/2018 6/18/2018 5 1 3 Grading Grading 6/19/2018 6/20/2018 5 2 4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/28/2018 11/14/2018 5 100 5 Paving Paving 6/21/2018 6/27/2018 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/12/2018 11/28/2018 5 100 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 7,290; Residential Outdoor: 2,430; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.45 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 5 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 23.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 62.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 6 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5085 0.0000 0.5085 0.0770 0.0000 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.5085 0.6228 1.1313 0.0770 0.5943 0.6713 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 7 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0218 0.7425 0.1396 1.8700e- 003 0.0402 2.9800e- 003 0.0432 0.0110 2.8600e- 003 0.0139 199.7543 199.7543 0.0103 200.0107 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0421 0.0272 0.3350 8.8000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 87.3564 87.3564 2.5500e- 003 87.4202 Total 0.0639 0.7697 0.4746 2.7500e- 003 0.1223 3.5300e- 003 0.1259 0.0328 3.3700e- 003 0.0362 287.1106 287.1106 0.0128 287.4309 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5085 0.0000 0.5085 0.0770 0.0000 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.5085 0.6228 1.1313 0.0770 0.5943 0.6713 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 8 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0218 0.7425 0.1396 1.8700e- 003 0.0402 2.9800e- 003 0.0432 0.0110 2.8600e- 003 0.0139 199.7543 199.7543 0.0103 200.0107 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0421 0.0272 0.3350 8.8000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 87.3564 87.3564 2.5500e- 003 87.4202 Total 0.0639 0.7697 0.4746 2.7500e- 003 0.1223 3.5300e- 003 0.1259 0.0328 3.3700e- 003 0.0362 287.1106 287.1106 0.0128 287.4309 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5330 0.0000 0.5330 0.0600 0.0000 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.4180 0.4180 0.3846 0.3846 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Total 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.5330 0.4180 0.9510 0.0600 0.3846 0.4445 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 9 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.5872 20.0141 3.7621 0.0505 1.0831 0.0805 1.1636 0.2968 0.0770 0.3738 5,384.679 7 5,384.679 7 0.2766 5,391.594 0 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0211 0.0136 0.1675 4.4000e- 004 0.0411 2.8000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.6000e- 004 0.0112 43.6782 43.6782 1.2800e- 003 43.7101 Total 0.6083 20.0277 3.9296 0.0509 1.1242 0.0807 1.2049 0.3077 0.0772 0.3849 5,428.357 9 5,428.357 9 0.2779 5,435.304 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5330 0.0000 0.5330 0.0600 0.0000 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.4180 0.4180 0.3846 0.3846 0.0000 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Total 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.5330 0.4180 0.9510 0.0600 0.3846 0.4445 0.0000 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 10 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.5872 20.0141 3.7621 0.0505 1.0831 0.0805 1.1636 0.2968 0.0770 0.3738 5,384.679 7 5,384.679 7 0.2766 5,391.594 0 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0211 0.0136 0.1675 4.4000e- 004 0.0411 2.8000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.6000e- 004 0.0112 43.6782 43.6782 1.2800e- 003 43.7101 Total 0.6083 20.0277 3.9296 0.0509 1.1242 0.0807 1.2049 0.3077 0.0772 0.3849 5,428.357 9 5,428.357 9 0.2779 5,435.304 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.7528 0.6228 1.3755 0.4138 0.5943 1.0081 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 11 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0421 0.0272 0.3350 8.8000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 87.3564 87.3564 2.5500e- 003 87.4202 Total 0.0421 0.0272 0.3350 8.8000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 87.3564 87.3564 2.5500e- 003 87.4202 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.7528 0.6228 1.3755 0.4138 0.5943 1.0081 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 12 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0421 0.0272 0.3350 8.8000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 87.3564 87.3564 2.5500e- 003 87.4202 Total 0.0421 0.0272 0.3350 8.8000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 87.3564 87.3564 2.5500e- 003 87.4202 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Total 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 13 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.2100e- 003 2.7200e- 003 0.0335 9.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.7356 8.7356 2.6000e- 004 8.7420 Total 4.2100e- 003 2.7200e- 003 0.0335 9.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.7356 8.7356 2.6000e- 004 8.7420 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 0.0000 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Total 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 0.0000 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 14 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.2100e- 003 2.7200e- 003 0.0335 9.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.7356 8.7356 2.6000e- 004 8.7420 Total 4.2100e- 003 2.7200e- 003 0.0335 9.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.7356 8.7356 2.6000e- 004 8.7420 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 15 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0758 0.0490 0.6030 1.5800e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 157.2415 157.2415 4.5900e- 003 157.3563 Total 0.0758 0.0490 0.6030 1.5800e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 157.2415 157.2415 4.5900e- 003 157.3563 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 0.0000 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 0.0000 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 16 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0758 0.0490 0.6030 1.5800e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 157.2415 157.2415 4.5900e- 003 157.3563 Total 0.0758 0.0490 0.6030 1.5800e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 157.2415 157.2415 4.5900e- 003 157.3563 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.5068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Total 0.8055 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 17 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.5068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Total 0.8055 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 18 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 19 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0380 0.1524 0.3891 1.2000e- 003 0.0935 1.4400e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3600e- 003 0.0264 120.7671 120.7671 4.7800e- 003 120.8866 Unmitigated 0.0380 0.1524 0.3891 1.2000e- 003 0.0935 1.4400e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3600e- 003 0.0264 120.7671 120.7671 4.7800e- 003 120.8866 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 19.04 19.04 19.04 43,975 43,975 Total 19.04 19.04 19.04 43,975 43,975 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.570523 0.041853 0.194077 0.115893 0.018544 0.005373 0.016909 0.024079 0.002502 0.002562 0.005975 0.000872 0.000837 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 20 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 NaturalGas Unmitigated 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 231.911 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Total 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 21 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Unmitigated 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 0.231911 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Total 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 22 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0139 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 2.0726 0.0399 2.6806 5.0500e- 003 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 40.7567 12.3529 53.1096 0.0504 2.8800e- 003 55.2265 Landscaping 5.0800e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.1658 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 0.2971 0.2971 2.9000e- 004 0.3044 Total 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6500 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 23 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0139 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 2.0726 0.0399 2.6806 5.0500e- 003 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 40.7567 12.3529 53.1096 0.0504 2.8800e- 003 55.2265 Landscaping 5.0800e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.1658 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 0.2971 0.2971 2.9000e- 004 0.3044 Total 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6500 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 24 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 9:59 AMPage 25 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Project Characteristics - Intensity Factors for CO2 adjusted based on PG&E RPS reductions Land Use - Applicant provided Construction Phase - Applicant provided Grading - Applicant provided Demolition - Applicant provided Vehicle Trips - Based on ITE rate (Single Family Homes, 210) 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 2.00 Dwelling Unit 0.45 3,600.00 6 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 409.81 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Alcalde Road Lot Split Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 1 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/21/2018 11/28/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/7/2018 11/14/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/14/2018 6/27/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/15/2018 7/12/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/21/2018 6/28/2018 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/8/2018 6/21/2018 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.45 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 363.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 130.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.65 0.45 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 409.81 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.91 9.52 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.62 9.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 2 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 1.8947 30.3063 9.6373 0.0598 1.6571 0.8593 2.1575 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,320.589 0 6,320.589 0 0.5992 0.0000 6,335.569 5 Maximum 1.8947 30.3063 9.6373 0.0598 1.6571 0.8593 2.1575 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,320.589 0 6,320.589 0 0.5992 0.0000 6,335.569 5 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 1.8947 30.3063 9.6373 0.0598 1.6571 0.8593 2.1575 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,320.589 0 6,320.589 0 0.5992 0.0000 6,335.569 5 Maximum 1.8947 30.3063 9.6373 0.0598 1.6571 0.8593 2.1575 0.4356 0.8026 1.0304 0.0000 6,320.589 0 6,320.589 0 0.5992 0.0000 6,335.569 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 3 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Energy 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Mobile 0.0334 0.1613 0.3962 1.1200e- 003 0.0935 1.4600e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3700e- 003 0.0264 112.9590 112.9590 4.8800e- 003 113.0809 Total 2.2045 0.2245 3.2517 6.3200e- 003 0.0935 0.3832 0.4766 0.0250 0.3831 0.4081 40.7567 152.8927 193.6494 0.0561 3.3800e- 003 196.0576 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Energy 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Mobile 0.0334 0.1613 0.3962 1.1200e- 003 0.0935 1.4600e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3700e- 003 0.0264 112.9590 112.9590 4.8800e- 003 113.0809 Total 2.2045 0.2245 3.2517 6.3200e- 003 0.0935 0.3832 0.4766 0.0250 0.3831 0.4081 40.7567 152.8927 193.6494 0.0561 3.3800e- 003 196.0576 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 4 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 6/4/2018 6/15/2018 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/16/2018 6/18/2018 5 1 3 Grading Grading 6/19/2018 6/20/2018 5 2 4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/28/2018 11/14/2018 5 100 5 Paving Paving 6/21/2018 6/27/2018 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/12/2018 11/28/2018 5 100 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 7,290; Residential Outdoor: 2,430; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.45 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 5 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 23.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 62.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 6 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5085 0.0000 0.5085 0.0770 0.0000 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.5085 0.6228 1.1313 0.0770 0.5943 0.6713 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 7 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0224 0.7617 0.1518 1.8400e- 003 0.0402 3.0500e- 003 0.0432 0.0110 2.9100e- 003 0.0139 196.5253 196.5253 0.0108 196.7962 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0336 0.3184 8.1000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 80.4787 80.4787 2.4100e- 003 80.5390 Total 0.0670 0.7953 0.4702 2.6500e- 003 0.1223 3.6000e- 003 0.1259 0.0328 3.4200e- 003 0.0362 277.0040 277.0040 0.0133 277.3352 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5085 0.0000 0.5085 0.0770 0.0000 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.5085 0.6228 1.1313 0.0770 0.5943 0.6713 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 8 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0224 0.7617 0.1518 1.8400e- 003 0.0402 3.0500e- 003 0.0432 0.0110 2.9100e- 003 0.0139 196.5253 196.5253 0.0108 196.7962 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0336 0.3184 8.1000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 80.4787 80.4787 2.4100e- 003 80.5390 Total 0.0670 0.7953 0.4702 2.6500e- 003 0.1223 3.6000e- 003 0.1259 0.0328 3.4200e- 003 0.0362 277.0040 277.0040 0.0133 277.3352 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5330 0.0000 0.5330 0.0600 0.0000 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.4180 0.4180 0.3846 0.3846 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Total 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.5330 0.4180 0.9510 0.0600 0.3846 0.4445 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 9 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6048 20.5323 4.0911 0.0497 1.0831 0.0821 1.1652 0.2968 0.0786 0.3754 5,297.638 4 5,297.638 4 0.2921 5,304.940 4 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0223 0.0168 0.1592 4.0000e- 004 0.0411 2.8000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.6000e- 004 0.0112 40.2393 40.2393 1.2100e- 003 40.2695 Total 0.6271 20.5491 4.2503 0.0501 1.1242 0.0824 1.2066 0.3077 0.0788 0.3865 5,337.877 7 5,337.877 7 0.2933 5,345.209 9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5330 0.0000 0.5330 0.0600 0.0000 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.4180 0.4180 0.3846 0.3846 0.0000 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Total 0.7858 9.7572 4.2514 9.7600e- 003 0.5330 0.4180 0.9510 0.0600 0.3846 0.4445 0.0000 982.7113 982.7113 0.3059 990.3596 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 10 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6048 20.5323 4.0911 0.0497 1.0831 0.0821 1.1652 0.2968 0.0786 0.3754 5,297.638 4 5,297.638 4 0.2921 5,304.940 4 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0223 0.0168 0.1592 4.0000e- 004 0.0411 2.8000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.6000e- 004 0.0112 40.2393 40.2393 1.2100e- 003 40.2695 Total 0.6271 20.5491 4.2503 0.0501 1.1242 0.0824 1.2066 0.3077 0.0788 0.3865 5,337.877 7 5,337.877 7 0.2933 5,345.209 9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.7528 0.6228 1.3755 0.4138 0.5943 1.0081 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 11 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0336 0.3184 8.1000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 80.4787 80.4787 2.4100e- 003 80.5390 Total 0.0446 0.0336 0.3184 8.1000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 80.4787 80.4787 2.4100e- 003 80.5390 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.6228 0.6228 0.5943 0.5943 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Total 1.0643 9.4295 7.7762 0.0120 0.7528 0.6228 1.3755 0.4138 0.5943 1.0081 0.0000 1,169.350 2 1,169.350 2 0.2254 1,174.985 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 12 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0336 0.3184 8.1000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 80.4787 80.4787 2.4100e- 003 80.5390 Total 0.0446 0.0336 0.3184 8.1000e- 004 0.0822 5.5000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 0.0223 80.4787 80.4787 2.4100e- 003 80.5390 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Total 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 13 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4600e- 003 3.3600e- 003 0.0318 8.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.0479 8.0479 2.4000e- 004 8.0539 Total 4.4600e- 003 3.3600e- 003 0.0318 8.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.0479 8.0479 2.4000e- 004 8.0539 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 0.0000 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Total 1.0848 11.0316 7.7512 0.0114 0.7087 0.7087 0.6520 0.6520 0.0000 1,146.532 3 1,146.532 3 0.3569 1,155.455 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 14 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4600e- 003 3.3600e- 003 0.0318 8.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.0479 8.0479 2.4000e- 004 8.0539 Total 4.4600e- 003 3.3600e- 003 0.0318 8.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 6.0000e- 005 8.2700e- 003 2.1800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2300e- 003 8.0479 8.0479 2.4000e- 004 8.0539 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 15 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0802 0.0605 0.5731 1.4600e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 144.8616 144.8616 4.3400e- 003 144.9702 Total 0.0802 0.0605 0.5731 1.4600e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 144.8616 144.8616 4.3400e- 003 144.9702 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 0.0000 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9202 8.7447 7.2240 0.0113 0.5109 0.5109 0.4735 0.4735 0.0000 1,070.137 2 1,070.137 2 0.3017 1,077.679 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 16 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0802 0.0605 0.5731 1.4600e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 144.8616 144.8616 4.3400e- 003 144.9702 Total 0.0802 0.0605 0.5731 1.4600e- 003 0.1479 1.0000e- 003 0.1489 0.0392 9.2000e- 004 0.0401 144.8616 144.8616 4.3400e- 003 144.9702 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.5068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Total 0.8055 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 17 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 0.5068 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Total 0.8055 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 18 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 19 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.0334 0.1613 0.3962 1.1200e- 003 0.0935 1.4600e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3700e- 003 0.0264 112.9590 112.9590 4.8800e- 003 113.0809 Unmitigated 0.0334 0.1613 0.3962 1.1200e- 003 0.0935 1.4600e- 003 0.0949 0.0250 1.3700e- 003 0.0264 112.9590 112.9590 4.8800e- 003 113.0809 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Single Family Housing 19.04 19.04 19.04 43,975 43,975 Total 19.04 19.04 19.04 43,975 43,975 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.570523 0.041853 0.194077 0.115893 0.018544 0.005373 0.016909 0.024079 0.002502 0.002562 0.005975 0.000872 0.000837 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 20 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 NaturalGas Unmitigated 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 231.911 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Total 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Unmitigated 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 21 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Unmitigated 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6501 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Single Family Housing 0.231911 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Total 2.5000e- 003 0.0214 9.0900e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 27.2837 27.2837 5.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 27.4458 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 22 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0139 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 2.0726 0.0399 2.6806 5.0500e- 003 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 40.7567 12.3529 53.1096 0.0504 2.8800e- 003 55.2265 Landscaping 5.0800e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.1658 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 0.2971 0.2971 2.9000e- 004 0.3044 Total 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6500 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 23 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0139 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0770 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 2.0726 0.0399 2.6806 5.0500e- 003 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 0.3791 40.7567 12.3529 53.1096 0.0504 2.8800e- 003 55.2265 Landscaping 5.0800e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.1658 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 9.1000e- 004 0.2971 0.2971 2.9000e- 004 0.3044 Total 2.1686 0.0418 2.8464 5.0600e- 003 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 0.3800 40.7567 12.6500 53.4067 0.0507 2.8800e- 003 55.5309 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 24 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:00 AMPage 25 of 25 Alcalde Road Lot Split - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Bay Area AQMD Air District, Mitigation Report Alcalde Road Lot Split Construction Mitigation Summary Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 1 of 11 Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel No Change 0 4 No Change 0.00 Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Graders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Pavers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Rollers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel No Change 0 8 No Change 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 2 of 11 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated tons/yr Unmitigated mt/yr Air Compressors 1.49300E-002 1.00290E-001 9.27100E-002 1.50000E-004 7.53000E-003 7.53000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.27663E+001 1.27663E+001 1.21000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.27966E+001 Cement and Mortar Mixers 4.40000E-004 2.76000E-003 2.31000E-003 1.00000E-005 1.10000E-004 1.10000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.43710E-001 3.43710E-001 4.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 3.44600E-001 Concrete/Industria l Saws 3.12000E-003 2.34900E-002 2.23400E-002 4.00000E-005 1.60000E-003 1.60000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.22594E+000 3.22594E+000 2.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.23218E+000 Cranes 1.42700E-002 1.70520E-001 6.30500E-002 1.40000E-004 7.38000E-003 6.79000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.31677E+001 1.31677E+001 4.10000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.32702E+001 Forklifts 1.33600E-002 1.18090E-001 9.08400E-002 1.10000E-004 9.42000E-003 8.67000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.04635E+001 1.04635E+001 3.26000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.05450E+001 Graders 2.60000E-004 3.56000E-003 9.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.20000E-004 1.10000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.03880E-001 3.03880E-001 9.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 3.06240E-001 Pavers 7.10000E-004 7.89000E-003 6.40000E-003 1.00000E-005 3.90000E-004 3.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 9.38920E-001 9.38920E-001 2.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 9.46220E-001 Rollers 5.60000E-004 5.45000E-003 4.23000E-003 1.00000E-005 3.80000E-004 3.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.23710E-001 5.23710E-001 1.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.27790E-001 Rubber Tired Dozers 8.70000E-004 9.42000E-003 3.28000E-003 1.00000E-005 4.60000E-004 4.20000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.85250E-001 5.85250E-001 1.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.89810E-001 Tractors/Loaders/ Backhoes 2.97200E-002 2.93710E-001 2.60980E-001 3.50000E-004 2.08100E-002 1.91400E-002 0.00000E+000 3.16908E+001 3.16908E+001 9.87000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.19375E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 3 of 11 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Mitigated tons/yr Mitigated mt/yr Air Compressors 1.49300E-002 1.00290E-001 9.27100E-002 1.50000E-004 7.53000E-003 7.53000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.27663E+001 1.27663E+001 1.21000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.27966E+001 Cement and Mortar Mixers 4.40000E-004 2.76000E-003 2.31000E-003 1.00000E-005 1.10000E-004 1.10000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.43710E-001 3.43710E-001 4.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 3.44600E-001 Concrete/Industrial Saws 3.12000E-003 2.34900E-002 2.23400E-002 4.00000E-005 1.60000E-003 1.60000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.22593E+000 3.22593E+000 2.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.23218E+000 Cranes 1.42700E-002 1.70520E-001 6.30500E-002 1.40000E-004 7.38000E-003 6.79000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.31677E+001 1.31677E+001 4.10000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.32702E+001 Forklifts 1.33600E-002 1.18090E-001 9.08400E-002 1.10000E-004 9.42000E-003 8.67000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.04635E+001 1.04635E+001 3.26000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.05450E+001 Graders 2.60000E-004 3.56000E-003 9.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.20000E-004 1.10000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.03880E-001 3.03880E-001 9.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 3.06240E-001 Pavers 7.10000E-004 7.89000E-003 6.40000E-003 1.00000E-005 3.90000E-004 3.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 9.38920E-001 9.38920E-001 2.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 9.46220E-001 Rollers 5.60000E-004 5.45000E-003 4.23000E-003 1.00000E-005 3.80000E-004 3.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.23710E-001 5.23710E-001 1.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.27790E-001 Rubber Tired Dozers 8.70000E-004 9.42000E-003 3.28000E-003 1.00000E-005 4.60000E-004 4.20000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.85250E-001 5.85250E-001 1.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.89810E-001 Tractors/Loaders/Ba ckhoes 2.97200E-002 2.93710E-001 2.60980E-001 3.50000E-004 2.08100E-002 1.91400E-002 0.00000E+000 3.16908E+001 3.16908E+001 9.87000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.19374E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 4 of 11 Fugitive Dust Mitigation No Soil Stabilizer for unpaved Roads PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction No Replace Ground Cover of Area Disturbed PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction No Water Exposed Area PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Frequency (per day) No Unpaved Road Mitigation Moisture Content % Vehicle Speed (mph) 0.00 No Clean Paved Road % PM Reduction 0.00 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction Air Compressors 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 7.83313E-007 7.83313E-007 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.56291E-006 Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 3.09987E-006 3.09987E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Cranes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.51886E-006 1.51886E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 7.53567E-007 Forklifts 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.55700E-007 9.55700E-007 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.89664E-006 Graders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Pavers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rollers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Tractors/Loaders/Ba ckhoes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.46646E-007 9.46646E-007 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.25245E-006 Yes/No Mitigation InputMitigation InputMitigation InputMitigation Measure CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 5 of 11 Operational Percent Reduction Summary Unmitigated Mitigated Percent Reduction Phase Source PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 Architectural Coating Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Architectural Coating Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 6 of 11 Category ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Electricity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Natural Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operational Mobile Mitigation Mitigation Selected No No No No No No Category Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use % Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 -0.01 Input Value 1 0.13 Input Value 2 Input Value 3 Measure Increase Diversity Land Use SubTotal Integrate Below Market Rate Housing Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Destination Accessibility Improve Walkability Design Increase Density Project Setting: CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 7 of 11 No No No Neighborhood Enhancements Neighborhood Enhancements Neighborhood Enhancements 0.00Implement NEV Network Provide Traffic Calming Measures Improve Pedestrian Network No No No No No No Parking Policy Pricing Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Parking Policy Pricing Parking Policy Pricing Parking Policy Pricing Neighborhood Enhancements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Limit Parking Supply Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal Transit Improvements Subtotal Increase Transit Frequency Expand Transit Network Provide BRT System Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal On-street Market Pricing Unbundle Parking Costs Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal No No No No No No No No Commute Commute Commute Commute Commute Commute Commute Commute Commute 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transit Subsidy Commute Subtotal Provide Ride Sharing Program Employee Vanpool/Shuttle Market Commute Trip Reduction Option Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules Workplace Parking Charge Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out" Implement Trip Reduction Program CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 8 of 11 Area Mitigation Measure Implemented No No No No No No No No No No Mitigation Measure No Hearth % Electric Chainsaw % Electric Leafblower % Electric Lawnmower Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior) Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior) Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior) Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior) Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Only Natural Gas Hearth Input Value 150.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 Energy Mitigation Measures Measure Implemented No No No Mitigation Measure Install High Efficiency Lighting On-site Renewable Exceed Title 24 Input Value 1 Input Value 2 No School Trip 0.00Implement School Bus Program 0.00Total VMT Reduction No Use Low VOC Paint (Parking)150.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 9 of 11 Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % Improvement ClothWasher 30.00 DishWasher 15.00 Fan 50.00 Refrigerator 15.00 Water Mitigation Measures Measure Implemented No No No Mitigation Measure Use Reclaimed Water Use Grey Water Apply Water Conservation on Strategy Input Value 1 Input Value 2 No No No No Install low-flow bathroom faucet Install low-flow Toilet Install low-flow Shower Install low-flow Kitchen faucet 32.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 No No No Turf Reduction Water Efficient Landscape Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems 6.10 Solid Waste Mitigation Mitigation Measures Input Value CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 10 of 11 Institute Recycling and Composting Services Percent Reduction in Waste Disposed CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/10/2018 10:01 AMPage 11 of 11