Loading...
CC 02-07-72 . . . . . , mr op CI!1'EJ:IDIO, State of Ca1UørD1a / - Torre beIIK, Cuput1ao. ea:·fomia ;i~: 2Sl-4S05 ..;r.';', " ,"" ,¡i,¡'^' ", 'é. , .~~;e';J.' ,~,:';)~', <,"'t" ,"4~',~" ';',' ;};'~~~i'ii ", ' ~\j..,-~' , . "~'ï' ~:~"..¡¥~? :;,~;I ':T!t.'t~'~""'" ',:f~t~~t~; ',~, . ,.;.j¡-, _."1. 'hus~ or tIlE 1ŒGUUa.~".,''': OF THE CIr: COtIHCIL ,.. '1, ~, ... IEDUAKY 7. J.9#'fìJìm' COUllCIL awmu crrr BALL, :\Mr'~.J..~~'. CALIIOIIU ~',' '" - ", ',.:;. '''y'. ," ,i-. ¡.';~,,;;~ i,' SII8rE TO nœ: nAG '~,,;,. ._,[ Noel c~~ the aeetiq ac 7:30 PH witb the Salute to the Zb8. 8DU. CALL Ccvroc1.l:oen ;:r<~c: QlaDcil:oen a::~:: Fitzgerald. Fro11ch, Ir.in. S:okes, Major 50e ~one Su!f prese:: City Ha:ager ~~1nlan City MtOr-...ey /tda:¡s Director of Aè=in1strat:~e S~rv1ces Ryder Director of ?lann1ng a~c De~clc~ent Sis£ Director o! ?ar~s and Rccr~a:~o~ Butler Assistant D:.rector of Pu':: ~c ',orks Viscov:c:, Traffic '-I~~eer ~r1Sg Director of Public ~or:~ Yar:orough Jecord1:>& Secretary Lois In'.:arda ~zor Noel ;a::icly recognized Cir¡ Scout Trcu?s 954 and 626 vhc ~e ~rese~t a: :~e first ?art of t~is Council =.ect~ng, workin¡ on C1>e1r ¡;1tize=! s 3adge. aulII1ES OF "J!\':C'l'S !iEET1HG 1. ApprovL =í ~::utes of replar _eUns of January 17. 1972. Biwed by Cou:c' '......- S~okes, secoD'ied by Cou~cil:an Fitzgerald to IIf'Prove the !C.::u:u of Janua~ 17. 1972, as \;r~tten. Køtion carried. 5-0 CC-104 rase 1 an. 11th 1nutes a;:;>rov8t s written. . 71-82 eel f ¡ ! . e OF TIŒ rnMI:Þ.,. 7. 1972, 1Iegular City Council KHt1Da CAnalS 2. VrittllD a. llequest f~~~tSarlta Clara CouDty nood Control Water District that the C1t1C:GUu:1l adoI't a rolso1ut1on œging 1œIediate 1nvea- tigatlon of .t.....uda of mercury cont8lll1øat1on by the rood aøð Dru¡ M:úD!stration of the United Statu. :oved by Councilman Irvin, secom, e t by Councll1:1an Fitzgerald to &elopt solution No. 71-82. Motion carried, 5-0 b. ~equest froc the Parent-Hawaii Group of Hoover School for a so:1c1~ation permi~ to sell candy and raffle tickets si~1lar to the aut~orizat1on granted last year. If approved, it is requested the busi~ess license fee be waived. Hoover ca~y ¡ So D~ved by CouncilDan S~okes, seconded by Counc1lcan Irwin. raffle ~1cltet permissl~ Motion carr~ed, S-O arant!!d c. Request froc Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children and Adults of Santa Clara County for pe~iss1on to conduct its a~nual c8m?aign within the c~unity an¿, in addition, for a ?roclacat1on ~o be issued ~y the Mayor. If a?proved, it is requested the business license fee be waived. laster Seal So ~cved ~y CouncilDa~ Stokes, secon¿ed by Councilman Fitzgerald. Socie;y reqaes granted. ~~t1on carried, S-O mer. ~..r Soc. request ¡ranted. d. Request:'y A:1er1can Cancer Society, Santa Clara Coat~ty Unit, for pet':lission to solicit funds for the =a1endar year of 1972. If approved, it is request~d the business license fee be ~aived. o coved by CouncilDan Fitzgerald, seconded by C0:1nc1lQan Fro1ich, Motion carried, S-O I e MDJUrES OF THE FEBIWARY 7, 1972, 1lEGULA1l CITY COWCIL MEETING e. A petition siped by various City residents, resiatering complaint about certain masazine solicitors. Councilman Stokes said he, too. bad some telephone calls on this and suggested that if this ~robles arises again they should call City Ball. f. A resolution of the Board of Supervisors fixing 2 PH, February 23, 1972, in th1 Chambers of the Board as the time and place for holding a public hearing to deteroine whether or not the public interest or necessity deoands the formation of the Santa Clara County Transit District. g. Notification fro: San Jose Water Wor&s advising of the f~ling with t~e Public Utilities Co~1ssion of a r~que5t for authorization to adopt ",onthl}" billir:gs w1~h bimonthly readings. They state this will not result in an increase of rates to any customer. h. 1nforcational letter fro: Office cf Education, County of Santa Clara, advising ~ha~ ~his office is co~?iling in- fo~.at¡on rela~ing to the studies and hearings o~ unifi- ca~ion of school districts not already within a unifo~ school district. This oatter relates to t~e June electio i. ~o~ice frOD the Board of Supervisors that a public hear in is scheduled for 9:30 ~~ on Fe~ruary 16, 1972, in the ChaDbers of the Board for the consideration for inclusion of properties into t~e agricultural preserve for the Coun~y of Santa Clar~ as follows: Ht. Eden Road between Pierce and S~evens Canyon Roads by A. & J. Fall1co, 22700 Mt. Eden Road, Saratoga, and Along Stevens Creek Canyon Road by J. , A. Picchett1, 10165 Adriana Avenue, Cupertino. j. Le~~er frOD Mrs. Mary Lcu Zoglin, President, Board of Trustees, Foothill Co~un1ty Collese District, advising the City of their pleasure in having the new recycling center on campus. k. Letter from Sharon Ca~ura, Secretary, Board of Directors, Oakdell Ranch ~eowners Association, thanking the City for planning ~he Ph~r Lap Drive - Stevens Creek Blvd. walk fAC1l1ties . CC-I04 age J 11 City Ball 111 th coaplainu bout solicitorl i-no:lthly water eeter readings chool nificatio:. gricuit:Jral reserva:. :'0:". ubllc hearing ecycling Phar Lap Dr he walk facilities ~itten Co=. received , filed Res. to 1r.1;:;>or Transit Din. e . OF tHE rEBlDAJtt 1. 1972, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL HEETIBG 1. Letter fraa A8erican Society for Quality Cootrol requa.tins that the __ of Karch 5-11, 1972 be proc1a18ecl "QualIty Veek". So 1IIØftd by Counc:illlaD InriD. seconded by Councilman litzseraleS. !lotion csrried, 5-0 1:1. Letter fr_ Kr. Robert Karpen, requestins a œetins of the Steerins ~ttee of the Coals Coccittee with the City Council prior to ~Arch 6th Council Heet1ng. ~. P.G.' E. bas filed a request for gas rate increase with ~he PUC. c. Le~ter fro: Shirley Aden regarding a na~ter on ~h1s agenda, second rea:i~g of Ordinance 524. p. Letter fro: Eure~a Federal Savings. Counc11~n Sto~es felt ~~at a =eeting ~ith the Steer1ng C~lttee prior to March 6th ~ould pree~pt any reco~"enàations by the C~1ss1ons and ~1ttees. Mayor Noe: ~~d Co~ncil~an Fitzgera:d agreed. ve¿ by C:uncil~n Sto~es, seconded by Counc1~an IrJin, to receive and file the .r:tten coc=u~icat1o~s. ~tio~ carried, 5-0 It was ~oveå by Counci:=an Sto~es, secondêd by Counc1lnan Ir:1n, 1f it ~as not 3:ready been done, ~o ~ave a Resolutio~ ;orepared to ~he Board f Superv1~ors to supp:rt t~e Transit District. Y~tion carried, 5-0 Oral Co=cun1cations -- None (a> Request by Col1ncilcen for re=oval of items fron Consent Calendar. Tnere ,ere none. . . IIDIU'I'ES OF 'IE FEBRUARY 7. 1912 .JŒGtJLA1l CITY COUNCIL HEETIJlG II&&'VU OF COtJ:\CIL REl'1I1:S1!JIrATIF'..5 4. Transportation Policy c:-ttee - Coll:lc:ilman Frol1c:h ",'< CaaDc:lllD8n Fro"-ic:h said ~ -1'1_ Stokes went in his stea4. CoaIIc:ib::laa Stcò<es said tbe TK çec1al :eetins was held. JIa Cbat the Advisory District .nL11 be successful i~ the election. For instance, San Jose. with 40% 0: the pO¡IUlaUon, o:11y u. ODe wote. He said he votecl .pt.....~ the tIOUO:1 bec:ause he felt the City of Cui'er~ino was DOt eqlÚtably represe:1ted. S. Plann1,.g ?o:icy Co=mdttee - Gounc1~n :~tzgerald CounCil::laD n:zg~rald said :e bad not:1ing to report on the ppe, but the or.:: S;>ace Co=1ttee hMI a ::::eeti~g. 6. Inter-C1:y Council - ~or !I<:>el Mayor Xo~l sa:¿ t~ey ~d a d~3~~~~ion the pre~iJus Thursday ~ t~e S~yvale Eo~.:~g E=erge~C7 so. 911. He said it is vorò<i~g ~~ite well, and ~~:: ~e disc:ussed ~ other co-~unities no~. Also dis- cussed ~er' ~~~ividual jur~3éic:tio~ for secretarial services a.~ South Bay =i$~~arge. 7. League:: California Cit~s - ~~yor Noel 50 report. 8. Ast'ociat~~n of Bay Area Go:rver=ents - Councilman Frolic!:. A seneral ::eeting is coa1::g Vi' 0: either February 16 or 24. no.. City Manager ..ill check ~;¡1s OIIt. 1røe City ~A~~er said he does ~t ~uest1on the entry fee; but he does questi":: the appropri.at::..o:::: OIl Cr1!::1nal Justice. Mayor 11081 eaid ~;1is \o'as also quest1cr...ec! at t:'e last Ma)"ors' meeting. ~e Council Me:±us are ~o re.r-ev c:.e ôudget and contact Council::lan I'rolicb. 9. rlood Co::~rol Advisory r~i.sion - Cou::cilQ&n Stokes JIo _eting. -104 age S AG General etinø; ",1ew the D\1dge , CC-Io. ,~~. 6 :{ , ~( t Solid ~- Sy:çoslJe t: :!(arch . . JmmTES OF mE FEBllUAKt 7. 1972 IlEGtILAll CITY couøCIL KEETUG ~o. Santa Clara County VaU1' (>-hs1on - CouncihaD Stoku ..etiAl· u. SoUd Waste c-ftÞe of PlanøiAg Policy Ca:aittee - CoI:D. PueU A .olid vaste site Wail sulMdttecl to the plaaniAa Policy Coaaicce. at their last :.et1n8. 'Ihere will !Ie a Solid Vasc. SJ2POsiUIII 111 March at the Jlanada IUD in S_ta Gus. Co::r:ú.sio:aer Puetz ..id a ceaber of the staff shauld attend. ~iss1o~er ?uetz said va have . unique situation in the fact that the JC's too~ an .c~iYe role in .ett1nl u~ the recycling ~rogram. :2. Drug .\:"... Co=I~~ee - CoWIC1l1ua Irwin Councit=a,. :~õin said the education ~rolra= continues to =e the ~ost ~port~~: :55'"". He sa1j that he wI:1 be headinl u~ a sub-c~1ttee to revIr~ :~. feedback. lJ. Hil~>:~. Co~ittee - Ccuncl1=an Stoke. :Öunc11=A,. ::o~es was u~.a=le to a~~end ~~Is =ee~ing. Planning ~lsslon ~.aIr--a= ~<y.r5 re?orte~ t~ere ~as a revir~ of ~he =a~s. The Hillside Study ~, ,=:~ress1n~. with a revl~õ of t~e ¡ol_c1es. It ~as decided t~ey wou:~ :. cataloge~ before .d~1tio~~: review. Aer~a: ~hotogra~hs of the ~~:¿ 3e:¡o area are ~~3ila~~e t~ t~e ru~l~c. A f:el¿ trip is .Jei.'!'1@ ~l~:1::.!j. ?I.A...~XI:;G :J~ ~ISS1o.'I l'. Su=~~:,::n of Minutes 0: regular ~eetlng 0: January 24, 1972. , 15. Recoc:::e,.!at1on to the City Council that the na:::e of "Bubb Road" be reu~:led. CouncI::a,. S:o~es coonented tha~ he was not in favor 0: creating a new 3treet ~¿: ~owever. fro¡ the re?ort~. there are prese~tly three street .es for ::~t street a~~ the C1~y Council cay wish to consider reducing thIs n"-~¿r :0 one or two. ~ere is nothJng historl~ ~bout the naoe "penin3ula Drio/e", so he would ~cns1der rena."1in¡¡ the ent~re street "Bubb". . . !WIun.S or THE FEBllUAllY 7, 1972, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Caaøcillllan Irwin noted that if aøything, we do not want to add co the confusion. He would like to keep the name that represents ~1n1 historical. ..... by CouncU:uan Stoke8. seconcIed by Councilr:1an Frol1ch to 10- vestisate the possibility of cbaD¡1D¡ the entire street n~ to Babb. IIot1oo carried, 5-0 !foved by Councill::an Sto~e.. secœu!ed by Councllcan Irwin to deny the reques~ of Tycshare to naoe the street sooething besides Bubb. Motion carried, 5-0 AJICIIITECfURAL A.'ID SITE APPIIDVAL co.~ITTEE 16. Submission of M1nu~es of regular :eet1ng of January 19, 1972. 17. Application HC-Sl,273B of Ditz-Cra.~e re~ue3t1~g approval of architecture of an alter3ate t~o (2) bedroo~ and den. Rec~~cn ed for approval. (con~1nued fr~ City Council ~eeting of January 3, 1972.) The D1rec~or ?f Planning and Develop~ent vent over the alterna~e ¥bicb creates the pos.ib1li~y of a third bedro~ instead of a ~e~. Of the en~ire 204 units 10 P~ase 1, 34 are one bedroo: and de~, 125 are two bedroOt:l, and 45 are r~o oedroon an~ den units. He reviewed the f¡oor plans for the t~ree sch~es. He said t~e basic CODCern vas whether or oot t~e TV roOD (or den) could be converted to another bedroom. The school dis~rict has been contacted a:¡~ they indicated that the addition of 24 units with the potent~al of anot:'er bedroO!:1 was of no concern to theo. The H-Contro1 Co_i~te reco==ended approval of the delux tvo-bedroO!:1 units. It ~as noted there is a 4' difference in roof heigb~. !fro Pat O'Connell, of Diu-,Crane, said the only change ill about 4' on the roof line. It wU'" Wle ex.ac~ly the s8l:te ground coverage. !foved by Councilman Stokes, seconded by Councilman Frolich to approve the alternate 2-bedrooa anri den proposal. Motion carried, S-O C-I04 age 7 os&1bly change cire street tl bb share re!lues1 enied 1tz-Cra"e Iter~a:e roposa: itz-Crane alt. pproved BC-51,l47.l approved !!C-51,2'~:. 2 approve¿ IiC~l,234 a?õ'rov..¿ :,«~, . . lllAuu.5 OF THE FEBllUAllY 7, 1972 JECULAJl CITY COUNCIL MEETING ,. II. Application HC-51,147.1 of Paul Swanson requesting approval of .ite. ; _cbitecture, landscaping for ajlaus10n of service facility loca~ed y!,: ac 20235 SteveDS Creek Blw. Iec~ed for approval. ~';';Â" . l1li ' Øiìøted slides of tbe site were, sIIoIm. Elevations and site plan sh _Å ó";'¡'proposed office building aDd the addlt1cmal landscaping. Hr. JtøD , explained the building materials were slumps tone brick, plywood ;m¡¡¡ wood shùe œnsard roof. CouDciJJuD Stokes noted that the t-ulldiq have to be s¡Jr1nklered. CoaDc1lJ:lan Irwin asyed about the cœapr... ve landscape plan. Hr. Barris said it has been approved by the trol Co1!Dittee. ad by Counciloan Stokes, seconded by Councilnan Irwin, to approve .ppllcatio~ HC-5l,147.l. Moticm carried, 5-0 :3. Application ~C-5:,202.2 of J:=es ~d G11~ertson requesting approval I of a sign pla~ for a professi~~al office building locate~ at 19240 Steve..s Cree~ Blvd. Reco=oende¿ for approval. Aiter establi,~ing this was in accordance with the Ord1~ance, it was ~~d by Counci::::an Stokes, seco~¿ed by Cou~cil:1a:l Fitzgerald to &?~rove application 3C-51.202.2. ~otio~ carrieå, 5-0 20. Ai'i'l1~a~1on ~C-51.284 of QRS S~~~ Sign Co~rany requesting appro7al of a ~a:l 3ig~ i'reviousl, Laur~=ti¿e F1,.ance Conpany. located at 20021 S~eve=s Cr~e~ Blvd. Recu__~nñe¿ for approval, lored slides of the site -..ere sho..". The pole sign ,,111 be re:'love¿. ad by Ccunci:~n Sto~es. seco~.de¿ ~y Council~an Fit7.gerald to rove appaca~1o:l llC-51,284. Motion carried, 5-0 l. Ai'pl1catio:l HC-51,l08.3 of Y.M.C.A. requesting approval of archi- tecture for f~:lce scree:ling of e~ui~e:lt lo~ated at 20803 Alves Drive. Reco=en"ed for a;:proval. . . øa-.u.S OF TIlE FDlRUARY7, 1972 JIZGOL,AJt CITY COUNCIL MEETING '~_ J b1 CoUIICiman Stokes. se, -..-.. b1 Councilman Irwin. to " ":r ,'!La] '" appl1catio:1 HC-Sl.lOS.3. " ' .w, Motion unW. 5-0 , < ", ~.~ 22. ~Ication BC-51,07S.17B o£YaUco Park, Ltd. requesting approval of la:clscapius. 1!PUna. sign exce?tion and under- sroundiug of utilities for 1=dastrial òuilding located south of private road I:et\õeen interSecUo:1 of Ho::estead and F~ch løads and Ta:tt¡::; Avenue. JIeC_"""'ed for a?proval, n:. Director of l'la:mi:lg and Deve1o¡lc:.e:>t ::x;,lained the exception co ~e Sign Orèina:tce. ~ by C:>u"c~:=~ Sto:-es, sec~ed :')" Counciban Irwin to ~oye a?;,lica::~~ HC-51,075.l7B. Motio:t carried, 5-0 23. Ap~licatic,. ~:-5l,075.2~ of Vallco excep~1cn to th~ Sign Ord~nacce to project cc~struct~on s~gns ~ocate: Wolfe aoad and Stevens CreeL 31vd. Par:-, Ltd., requestinr allo'; t..'o (2) o~.-s1te at the northeast cor:ler of Reco~ended for a?proval. ~ed by Cou~c:l=an S~okes, se~¿ed :'y Counc1l~a:l Irwin to ~ove application HC-5l,075.20. Hø~ion carr:'ed, S-O 24. Applicatio,. ~C-5l,285.l of F~y Homes-Lytle requesting ap- proval of site, architecture, landscaping, lighting, signs and undergrounding of utili~ies for a ?rofess1onal office buil¿in; in a CG (C~~eral C~rcial) Zo:1e. Located at the southwest c"rner of Kirw~:l La:le and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. llecoacend for approval. ~ Planning Director said the sigDinS po~tion of this applIcation ----)d be dele~ed from t~C azenda; it will come u? later. Colored slide. of the site were sh~~. The architecture of the building .. Spanish mo~if" The site plan indicated the parking facilities. CC-I04 age 9 C-5l,075.17B pproved C-51,075.20 pproved lete signing ort1on of this ppl1cation at his time. ~, . e CC-I04 Pase 10 ~ OF 15£ F"WlTa1l'l 7. 1972 ~..&.. CITY coœcn HEETlS . l.arr! Þ1cla (Co-ov:18) ~:BIh .aU (co:atractor) wen .~.. ..~ lain t2 architecture "-~,' "ft'-ists of a stuCCO bv1141.., tdtla tile NOf. redwood p1ì -;t".:... the vÞIøn. aDCl · &11, II aDd ---o!z arouud the," ':1Iiíai1I1iZ1¡. All nof ....;ìt. - '" " be 8b .....:.el. '. " ' ' ;/. by c- '-.. Stokes. ti~ 3:-51.285.1. t"Jt" c:a.mc11:c Irvin to .rr---" !toU- can..s. ~ . '!here "'"" ~ a¡eada ites #25 dda tiM. AND A:3.:.1::0S CCHf1SSIaI . JIo ""'"t::,. CC»OC:::.:!i Subm1ss::c :: ~:~ute9 of :a:r~ 26, 197:. :'~"orary f=z1- Ci~y ~:a- .L;<= ~,.,"erec! ~-"i:::a" Stokes t 1: :"ere is not~i:11 ft.·.· :ur" s~ac:¡s treport ...:.: :", library :=~ture. :"'i¡:.t1;:¡ ;s..~~ :1C:!.1::-.a:-. ::-..:: ·..:u:d l~ke t.: ~e scøe k!n-:... ::'g~t:'~g "..i:"¿y. City :''':';f.= .~~: c::ecit ·or:':':- é1e arch1:ect. ""L\RY C~~;::;S _ Submi$~-:-. :: ~:'~u:es 0: :w-.-ry 18. 191':. (a) S'":=_'L~n of minute.5 ~f Steer1:t¡ C:-.::::::ee ",eet1nl of J..:...=-: :" 1972. (b) S~:,.::::~~ of Minu:es 0= Steering C:~_::"e ~eet1nl of J"-=-1;:- ::., 1972. . . KDI1JTES OF 11IE FEIIRUARY 7. 1972 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING lUBLIC 1IEAlL'iGS ~ 30. Proposal for the establ1abaeøt:of precise plan lines for the realiJFIMUt of McClellan IDad frOlll Bryne Avenue to Foothill Blvd. (Continued froa ....tiDg,.of January 17, 1972,) ~ Assista:t Director of Public"WOrks turned the presentation over to the Traffic Engineer. who presented three alternatives to the City Council: Alternate 1 goes straight across, eU:2inat1n the curves; Alternate 2 consists of widening of portions of the .creet to 1:ring it up to City standards; and Alternate 3 increases the radii 0: the turns. :'::-->'f;' '~... ;":"':'. ~,' "f Traffic fl~ naps were placed on the board. A 30' street ~idt~ vith an 8' s~dewalk on one side and a 14' c~uestrian/bike path on t~e other s~¿e was proposed was suggested. Kayor Noe: 3sked about t~e cost of Alternate 3. Tne Traffic Engineer s~:~ t~is has no~ yet ~een studied. Councl1~a~ S:o~es feels that Alternate 2 ia t~e ~est pro~o5.:. Be fee:s t~4: Stevens Cree~ Blvd. should r~~in t~e ~ain e~jt-west route tc S:c7cns Canyon Road. Counc1:~n Ir.,'in agreed. He wap in fav~r c: :a~ing as little property as possi1:1e ~n~ doinl as nuch as rcõs:1:1e to reduce sreed and hazards on ~cC:ellan. Councilo4" ~olich observed that .ith the adop~lo" 0: Alte~ate . it vou:d :cAve us the option to see if the plan ~1.l work. ~at stree~ i~rr:7e:ent will ult1=ately have to 1:e done in any case. i>e object<= :0 t~e real1g=ent of Alcalde, ;'c':ever. CO'.1nc U:-:an Irvin agr.e= with this Ias: state=ent. It .as poln~ed ou~ ~hat S..nta Paula and McClellan .ill stay ~~ere they are novo vi~h road i:2provele~.: s . Plannln¡ C~issioner Puetz suggested ~he Council consider s1lna:- isatlon at ~range Avenue. ?e then asked .hat _ould be the ingress sad egress 1: and when the horse ranch par~ ~~terlal1zes. Counci~,.n 5:o~es said acce:eration/deceleration lanes can be constructe: a:ong the horse ranch if needed. Mayor Noel sa~d ~her viII be sig~a:s at Bu~b Road. Mr. Paul Reece, 10490 Mira Vista, said is is a distinct pleasure to see t~e ~unc11 takes into account what they hear froQ the citizenry. ae asked what a standard street L~provp.~ents pac~ge iDvolvcs. T:1e Traffic Engineer said the pIa:> line rei\lly only sets the s:reet width but does not discuss ccr.struct10n at all. Br. Reece :~e:\ asked if Santa Paula chould be shifted to the south to avoid ta~i~g the two structures. This was taken under con- s1deratio::. C-l04 age 11 Clellan lternative. ,:t. 2 best ro~osal ignals a~ Su"b oss1bl11tj· of h1ft~n¡ San:& aula ,,:l¡h~ly o ~he so'~ th CC-104 .... 12 p ~~: ic ;(,,,!'l,,.s c:osed lit. 2 ~=::~j)te¿; ~taff to c:,~~:, .,:\ ::ov1::1 Sa:'!ta P.u:'~ t:) t~e aQ':::. e e or THE n:BIIJAU 7. 1972 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINC · AU ltIdin., PruDe, Tne Lane. OIpertino, asked bow :wch land will . to be taken OD, tJu(Íl1ope down, soinS vest. Diac:uss1oD followed. rec.ived a copyof"u.}pl- durin¡ the intemias1011. , ..... :,:¡"'-(:-« · Davis. 10620 Hërdllliâ"tøad. cœaentf!d that he vas Slad the ey «:ou:cil liatens to~~ dì. PeOPle; they have diapelled _ rumors. then asked the CouDc:1.t'tó leave the Santa Paula-Alcalde-Foothill C.rsecUo;1 &loa. lie . does noC feel there is that nuch of a traffic 111_ there. Mayor 1IOe1 explained that is what they are now plannins. · IDbert Ippolito. 2256 Alcalde, asked if her property is going to be .ft aloae. She vas told there will be some street dedication, but not s extr.-o a~ first anticipated. Ste vas advised to check with the staff for :ur~her clarification. · Ec~ert, 2233 Santa Paula, asked for specific info~at1on for that ortio:: ~f ~ae s~re.t 13 front of ~1~ house. He cooplainp.d abou~ t~e ~eedl~g car3 and the ¡AC£ of =uff:ers O~ 30:e 0: the cars. He _as v1$2d to call the H1glr~a; Patrol ~it~ t~ose cocplai::ts. · Carl :e:ler said ~.. would llke ~o ~ave the sharp cor.1er eli::inaced y havi"i t.:. street go straight up tie hill. lie ..as tol¿ this was ~~ancia::: ?roh1bitive. !r. !:ar,,:l Stevens, 10JOl) Mira Vista. ·.·a.~ter\ to a¿~ t:,at ~e ,,"auld Ilke to have t~e streets re:a1n the way t~ey ar~. 10ved ~: C:u~c:l~n S~o£es. secondej JY Cou~ci¡=an Ir~:n to close t~e a~':i~ b,~.tr~ngs. YES: ;QES: C~u~cil~n Fitzlera1d. Frc~ic~. I~'i~. Sto~es. ~aïor Noel :\o::.e Mo~ion carri~:!, 5-0 ove': b~· CO·.1ncl1':\a:1 Sto~es. aeCO:1¿e:' ~y Coun.;:!.:~a!\ Fro:':'ch. tLat Alteraate :.:1 :~C'. 2. =-~ sent to t:.e ?la:1n:':1!; C=~:~S5:0:: ':or re~():- ":e~¿ation a:1d _he sta:: i~ instructed to c~eck t.1~ rossibil!.t}- of ;jbi:ting Sa:1ta aula s:ig~~:y to the south. \YES: ;OES: C""n~il1:len Fitzgerald, Frc:io::, 1n:i::, Stoke~, :·!.'\:.."r ~oel X~~e MOt1oa ca~r:~~. 5-0 ... .,. t þ f \, r L HI' r ~~' MINUtES OF tHE FEBRUARY 7, 1972 REGULAll CITY COUNCIL MEETING CC-104 Page 13 Mayor Øoel called a rece.. at 9:15 PM. The meeting reconvened at 9:27 PM. 31. çpl1c:ation 35-%-71 by City of Cupertino for the prezon1ng of 0.57 acre frOD Santa Clara County "A" (Exclusive A¡riculture Greenbelt) Zone to Cay of Cu,ertino' R2-4.25 (Duplex Residen- tial - 4,250 sq. ft. per dwelling unit) Zone or to other z~e deC2ed appropriate by the City Council. Said property is located ..esterly of and adjacent to Stelling Road, approx1cate ¡ lCO feet north of Lilac Way. (PostFoned fro~ meeting of Jan'.1ary 17, 19" :~rst reading of Ordinance No. 525: ".I,:¡ Od~nance of the City of Cu;>ert~no k::en¿ing Sect!on 1 of CT¿~~~ce No. 2 by Prezo~i~g ~ Certaé~ Port:on of t~e County fr~= Co\.:nty "Au (Excl:.:si"le Agr~culture Gree:l:'elt) Zo~e to C~:y 0: C~rertino R2-4.25 (~Jrlex Resi¿e~t~a: 4,250 sq. ft. pe ~~:::~g Unit) Zo~e; A;>;>roxi~te.y 0.57 ~cre, Located "esterl7 0: a,,¿ Adjacen~ t~ Stelli~; ~oa¿. A??roxi'~te:y :00 Feet So:-:::: o~ Lilac War." - read t... ~ayor :\o~l. The :_a"~::.¡; Dlrec~or rev~e..e¿ the ;:re'l~ous !:eari:1g3 on this ap- pli~a: :.~::. ~unc:!l:1a:¡ Fitzgeral.¿ as',ed t:.e D:r2ctor if :1e :eels thi.i¿·~r:~':(. zoning is a ho;'¿ir.g zone. Director 5 :s:t said t~e ~ro- ;>ert:." s:u is :;uffic:ent for t:;o du¡::ex",. T.:e=!! is a¡';ays t;,e possi'oi:it}' of the ap;>i1cant co,lin¡; ~ac;;' 1" for increas!!¿ de~sit:· witt :~e 5;>ec1fic ;>ian. Duplex holdj~~ zone Atto=".y R~bert McN~ee, 12 Sou~h First Street, San Tose, said the} ro.erty le~~~ are ~~:~r;ste: ~n putt~~1 about Ó u~i:s on t~:5 ~roperty. ae does ~tself :0 a nct ti~,,~ ¿u?lex zon~~g :ekes t~e best use of t~is property. T:~e single, ó-un:t prortrty le"ds itself to a s~~gle :,uild1n¡; ";ith 6 u~its. This "n ui¡¿~ng give =~rt o?en space and only one e~trance to t~e street. All i~pr~7¿~e~ts h&ve been ,ut in at t~e ex;>ense of the property owner. He ¿i¿ ~: think it was fair :0 sugg~St the pr~;:erty O'T.er should have tc co=e in ~1~h a rezon~n& a?plication at a later da~e. Mayor See 1 asked for c~ents froo ~he aud1e:1ce. There were none. Mr. y'~'a~~e answered Co~cci~an F!tz¡;erald that t~ere is no specifi plan at this tlce for 6 units. Moved by Councilman Ir~in, seconded by Councilman Frolich to close the Pu:,lic Hearings. Public Hear ing! closed AYES: NOES: Councilmen Fitzgerald, Frolich, Irwin, Stokes, Mayor Noel None Motion carried, 5-0 CC-I04 Pase 14 ,12 Cluter Ori. to' be '. ,rawl.... '-A" Zone -c be taUn off before _- atioø 35-Z-71 a;>;,roved I Cr". 5¿S F:'-::H Rëa~~ ;; . . OF T!E FE311UAU 7, 19"12 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETIHG Cøaac:11:w1 frolich asked what. 1£ any prosress has been made reprdiDa IZ Cluter Ord1nance. The Plann1nS Director said the Pl·....f~1 , non. at their lat _tÚlS adopted a schedule to review the , 1IIaDc:u. TMa w11l c:oåa up a week from Wednesday night. 1=an bvin said he woa1d be in favor of a 6-unit development here. Coanciban Fitzgerald did DOt see how they would be acco::Ipl1shina a\11tb1na ruoni:!& t3is to B2-4.S. Counci1l!lan Stokes asked if there is any _raenc:y c:I tab, and if not, he would like to consider taldna this off the ..~a temporarily until t?le Ordinances are straightened out. Director Sisk said this "A" Zone has to be taken off before it can be annexed by the City. ed by ~~~ci:nan 1r~in, seco~ded by Counc11aan Stokes to approve appl1cati~~ 35-Z-7l. AYES: :roES: :c~~cil~en Fitzgerald, Frolic~. 1r~in. Sto~es, Mayor Noel ~;~=t! Motio~ carried, 5-0 ved by :c~"=::~an Sto~es, seco~ded by Co~"ci:~~ In/in, to have Ordinanco ;::. 323 read :,y title only and t:,e ~!ayor's readi~g to constit:.::: :':: ?irst lleading. AYES: XOES: c",.~=:: __en Fitzgerald, Frolic~, Ir'o'in, Stokes. ~.ayor Noel :;,:-::,Ç.. ~ot~o~ carried, 5-0 32. A?p:i:a::"" 32-Z-71 by C:ty of c-Jperti"c for the rezor,in; of O.)l! a:.... frœl lU-22 (S~"~:e-fam:l:' R,sidentia1 22,0::>0 sq. ft. :ûts~ Z",,= to Rl-¡I) (S:::,le-fa::i.y R~si","'tia¡ l~,:JOO s:;. it. lo:s) ZO:1~. ::aid propert}' is lotated ';esterly oi an.! adjace~t to }Iou~t Cres: ~~':'" approxi:..atel;' 150 feet SO'Jtr. of Linda Vista Drive. FirH re..~1ng of Ordi:1.i1~ce 526: ,. 0.,0. "A.~ Cr::i,..:¡c2 of t:'e C1C}' of Cu¡>ertino ,\.__e:1.ding Scctio~ 1 of Grdiila:1CC No. : =;, R¿cla3sifyic,g a certain Pør':o" o~ t:le City 0< Cu?ertino Fro", R¡-2: (5:':l;lè-;õa",~l}' Rosi¿~"tia! 22,JJ,) S~. Ft. Lots) Zc"e to &1-10 (Si~g:..-~~~ly Residential lG,OGO Sq. Ft. :ots) 7.o:!e; A?proxi",ate1y J.3: A~~¿ Locate~ ~es~er~J of a~¿ A~jace~t to Mount Cre~: Drive. Apprc:t~::~:¿l:' ¡50 Feet Souti¡ of I.i:!.!.. V:sta Dri '/e. II - read hj' Ma)'or ~;,,~ i. . . ILUIUYt;S OF .t"~ FEBRUARY 7, 1972 REGtJJ.AR CITY COUNCIL'1ŒETIHG " '~; .I'l_in& Director recapped the bearinss on this matter ac che i;,"'......."g Cocnission level. He said ,there ara atill oll1y two loes ",,,.'1:111. tlroperty. altbougb there 1øaD illegal Tentative Hap. } " !<FJiIr. Sea Harchese said hI! 1ø the OImer of Parcel A. This propoul 1ÌJ1l upgrade the property. It 13 presently a nuhanca rith the _torcycles cd cars 11;» there. The road 11 in. The buildable pad is 7000 .'\. ft. They are DOt grading &:1Y aUit10Dal building âtes. They ..-ill build and laDdscap. and II1gra:le the property. Mr. Take, ll~35 Mount Crest Place (Parcel C), said ~e would like to see Mr. ~Ãrc~ese build his h~e; however, t~ere is a proble2. There are :~~r lots up t~ere for sale. ~.re is unt:proved pro- perty behi~¿ a~d bel~~ ?arcel A. If this iI reduced to lO,~O sq, ft. lots it ','0:1:1 be setting a precedent, This is hUl are. and t~ere is s~~ ::11. t~e n~' o'~er of Parcel B ~as a~are t~at her lot was not :egal. ~~. M~rc~ese has ~ore tr.an one acre, b~t Parcel B de'> "ot. Colored s::'::", of t:,.. pro;ert:," "ere sho'.-n. ~. :'arc!¡ese sai:! ~;¡e pai sizes \-:'';:.:1 ::ot c:-_a::~'! ·.;~t~ t{.e rezon1~g. Tn.ese ;ta¿~ ..re cut, =-ot fill. Move:! by C:~":~:~n Stc~es, seconded by Council,.~ Irwin to close t:,e Public ""arings. AYES: 5OES: Ce~,,:i:~en Fitzgera:¿, Frol1ch. Irwin, Sto~es, Mayor ~oel XC~~ Motion carried, 5-0 HOved by Cc~,,:il~an Sto~es, seco~jed by Council~a~ Fitzgerald to approve ap;:::ation 3¡-Z-71. The City At::rney said ~his ~ould be contrary to the Urgency Ordinance c:=:ng Ur later o~ thlS agen~a. Af~er s~e discussion he said his aivice appli£s only to those pro,erties ~ithin t;¡e Hillside S:~~: area. AYES: 50£5: C~~":il~en Fitzg~ral~, Frolich, I~1n, Stokes, Ma¡or Noel S~"e Mo~ion carried, 5-0 TentaU'Ii arcel A owner's tatl!::lents arcel C o:..-ner's tate-:e~~s ~b!ic Hear~:-:';$ :.O&¿! 2-Z-71 ppr~ve¿ r I ¡ ¡ CC-I04 k..,... 16 "Ord. 526 I,,',""':'" " at......iø8 " ~; " ¡ , ApI' llca"t . s state.""nts Prcp:>5aI ~_ct ~:111g==:ou~ to the at'e:a. e e KINUTES or TIlE FEBauAU 7, 1972 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING : Hovecl by Counc1blan Stoke., ..coll4ec1 by CouDc1lman Irwin, to have OrdiDallCa S26réacl by title only aDd the Hsyor'. ceaclina to constitute the l1rst Þ.A6ta. AYES : HOES: Coanc:U- FitzsetaU, Frol1cb, Irvin, Stokes, Hayor ~oel lOne .. Hotion carried, S-o 33. Appeal of Herle and Ruthann Loney requesting reversal of the Plal1l11ng Co=ciss1on denial of application 37-Z-71 requesting to prezone 1.17+ acres froo County 113-2.4 (Multiple Residential 24~O sq. ft.-per d~ll1ng unit) Zone ~o Ci~¡ of Cu?ertino R3-2,2 (Multiple &es1¿ential 2200 sq, ft. ?er d~ell1dg unit) Zone. Said ::>roperty is located northeast corner of the intersection of Palo Vista Road and Janice Avenue. C~l~rcd slides and visual aids were used to acquaint the Council ~1th the area. The Pla.,~in~ Director s~ated t~at the PI ann in; CO~~i5sion r¿co~~¿nded denial 0: this appll.ation. ~r. Merle Lonc7, 1137 Bernard:', ~u~1~~ale, said he o.~3 t~o du;~exes in ~urertino and ".Jsed to :,ive here hi::Eelf. ~e 5ai¿ t>.c previolJs "wner of t3is pro¡>erty a::>::>lied for rezoning in lS~7. There 'cere t:~r~~ re3sons for de:'lial at t:'1.at ti:-.e: 1) nU:1:cipal faci;'ities; 2) irstigat1"g a street stud}' ?lan; an1 3) a ptann?r, ,;ho ':35 to be ..i:<" s:l~rtly, would be a"le to ad,-ise t::e t}'pe 0: zO"l1ng to go on t.~e pro;oerty. T;~e rea~on it ~"as d~nied hy t:1e ]a3r¿ 0': S'Jpcrv tsars ','as t"dt it wou:¿ 1:e near Rl and would a:fect t~le -,..be of t:le Rl :to:::~S i:1 t:..at area. ~tr. Loney said he d isagree¿ -:t:1 t:-.cse statp.:1e:tts. .Ie sa¡~ he :las 1r.itiated ..~ne7.atio:\ proceed ::\g~. ::e has Co':ntj' R3-2.4 ZO:linS; t:~~re is no co~para'Jlc zou....ng !.;1 Cup~rtino. The wcll-'(~?t. .' cdest :,:o::es in t;¡e araa "·:ere built 12 - 2D years :1;0. T'1e ~~ite ?lan and arc::itecturdl plans were placed on t:,e :'o'lr¿. The plan c"Us for i'~~ t·...·o-~edroon 2-1/2 bat;....:.; un~ts ~.:ith t··o on-,:!t? ?ar'·.::1~ 5?a~~:= ?~r unit. In addition, there ,<ill be t;,·o off-sit" pa:.ci;'g spa~es ?er unit. r~12 dc¿icated $treets \1:.11 be put in. No ~3rag~3 a.rt:. facing t::e 5treet. r,e r('creational area will be self- ;ontain"C:. T:I"r" "U 1 1:" aåp.quate landscaping. V~yor ~"el asked for co~ents fro~ the audi"nce. Rev. John Donaldson. 22281 n"llevue, said his ho~e is acrOS3 t~e street fro;:; this property. He f"cls the propGsal would r,"t :,e in,!i;C!10U3 to the ~·..1rrou:1ding arè&. lie :ccls the Plaanin[: Con:~j r"R:f.O!1 Tf.;co:.t:::endation for d_nial of this a::>plic3tio~ is just. T~is pro?osal will greatly incr~aso th" traffic. ",,8, . - e JwlU1r.S OF TIlE FDIIJAU 7, 1972 llEGULA1I. CITY COUNCIL MEETING CC-I04 age 17 ¡:.... I 1Ir. Qule. A...Ctøaoo ..id tha applicant pre_tell aD IIDt~a plct1ln of taaria~~;:hBa 18 tl'Yiug to set a ~ec:ecIent. If giveD tile IODiÌ1I be.........~~tbe appliC:aDt could make uae of 1IIO%a thaD tile 8 1ID1ts he ie, ¡4.Þ~.1q. 'P- Itr. DDD K1mIt,t~:.m3;:Jamce said his mot~er owns the bollia he lives iDe J I the, piopòHci devel0P_Dt is built he vill have their If.&ltt~ shiDiug ript in h1a viDdO'.18. ~;~.~:}. i~" ~, : .~...,;i;t' ~"'''] -'-,' eighbon' t. Mr. Fred Kills. 10271 Hira Vista said the comcunity is 100% agains ~is proposal. ae owns duplexes, too. But thia plan does not fit iDto this area. Mr. Walter !f.erric:t, 10200 Pa=elee Road, said he lives at the end of .J&:1ice. There are a lot of scalI children in the area ,,110 play in the streets, With this plan, we are ta1~1ng about 72 =ore cars. Mr. Gary G1l~reth. 10228 Palo Vista, presented ~¡ides of the area, ~has1zing his disapproval of the applicant's plans. He said mos~ of the h02es in t~e area are on 1/4 to 1/3 acre and are worth between $20,000 and $50,OJO. Mr. Keith Tho=pson, Palo Vista, said a ho:ogeneous group is living there and this proposal ~1ll not fit in. Mr. BaÒness, 22291 Ra=na, said he has a 1913 :::ap c:hich calls th1 area "lns¡l1ration i'o~nt". r.~ere are all :'lice res~dences aroun:i there. He coved there 20 years ago a~ if this ~s òu~lt he will lose his view, He ~ou¡d :1~e to see i~ go òac:~ to County aI-IO. Mr. Loney explaihed that ~his is the kind of desig:'l that ~s being built these days. Housing has to be provided for people who can't afford ~o buy a hooe. He said R3 adjacent to co==erc:al property is good planning. The paper roads are still paper roads; tha~ is why the traffic is bad. He feels the business of providin; hous1n for people is a legiti:a~e business. He said he has no intention of putting core ~han 8 units on the property. The driveway could be switched over to the other side of the property. He said he talked to people living by this property and they are not happy about t~e minibikes, li~ter, etc.,on the vacant property. his õ<ind of ous~ng is :eede( Haved by Counc1Iaan Sto~es, seconded by Counc11=an Frol1ch to close Public H&&ri~g3 the Public Hearings. closed AYES: NOES:, CounciIcen Fitzgerald, Frolich, Irwin, Stokes, May~r Noel None Hation carried, 5-0 ',00.104 " Pap 18 , )- ¡,' t";':;<' ;.~ t~~ ;" ,~," 37~Z-i1: . dÌla1ed ~ando~~: of .,ro;oer::; e e OF mE FEBItILUr 7. 1972 REGULA1t CITY COURCIL huUlIIG i1DaD Stokes N1cI be cIoea DOt think the propoNl 18 coapatible ,,' tb ths area. ~....,~ Frol1ch said it was macta clear 111 1967 tÎlat this would nöt w~..toprlate loning in that area. 1,;. ,:" ell by Co1mc:i1IIIm scoJres. seconded by Counc1llll&n Frol1cb to deny , plication 37-Z-71. CoUncilmen nuserald, Frol1ch, Irwin, Stokes, Mayor 11081 None . . : !lotion carried, 5-0 (a) Resolut1on~. 3207: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cu?ertino Ordering Vacation of a Portion of a Public Service Ease=ent Within the City of C~.,ert1no Pursuant to Section 50430 of the Govern~ent Code of ~he State of California. II - read by }layor Noel. ~e Ass~stant Director of Public Works explained this involves the aèando~~nt of property. Public !:~"-i=g '~oved b:: Council:::an S~OLeS, sec ,..ded by Councilnan 1rò1n, to close closeè t~e Publ~c Hearings. Res. 32~7 adopt!!C! '\YES: >DES: Counc11nen Fitzgerald, Frolich, Irwin, Stokes, Mayor Noel )lone Motion carried, 5-0 ~ved by Counc1l:::an StoLes. seconded by Councilman Iròin to adopt solution No. 3207. Councilnen Fi:zgerald, Frolich, Irwin, Sto~es, Y~yor Noel None ~Jotion carried, 5-0 . - "'UJ:!\S OF D!£ FEBRUARY 7, lÐ2 EGULAll CITY COUNCIL ME~IJIG ;:/ ,3t. Approv1:l¡ the Ñ'n.....·rfda of Cereain Contiguous Uninbab1U11 :T/~i'::.~·~erritory De8iguaCe4' ~ ' ~ 7l-S" as follow.: ' " , t '" i :" ' , . i"~!'(a) OrcIi:w1ce lito. n,: -ààØrcl1Danl:e Approving the,-- 't' ,tI~',.~,',},~,,'.r ' of Certain eon"., .h:~ft"."ited Territory., De.'~.~ :; ^,;, 'IIoDestead 7l"~' .\to ttIIe City ot Cupertino in AcCøiillíDce with the Prod.~;'~ Section 35300 It Seq. of th!'.~'; Goverment Code of 'die State of Cdifornia." - reaa It)' '- Mayor Noel. u.e Assista:1t Director of .....u.. Works explained that this ... a City-initiated a:mexatiDr1. ~ll:Dan Sto~es <:uestioned wether _ could ax:.::ex State Higlr.nt)" 1dchout a ietter fro::l ti:e State. 'DIe Director of Public llora 8Uted that the staff has beeD in amtact with Ùe State &boat ë1.s .00 they have not objected. BDved by Cou=z:l~n Stokes, ~ed by Counc1l~n Irwin to close the Puòiic E~rings. AYES: JIDES : ~~~~~l~en Fi~zgera}¿. Froiic~, 1r;in, Sto~es, Mayor ~el Nc=~ MOt1o= carried, 5-0 !bYed by Cc~~il~ Stokes. £~:ed by Counc1ioan Irwin t~t OrdiDance Sc. 529 be read :y :i~le only and t~e Mayor's reading to constitute t~e F1r3~ äeadz-g. AYES: WDI£S : Cc~:~l~en Fitzgeral~. Frolich, 1~1~, Stokes, Mayor Xoel N:"~e MO~1ø: carried, 5-0 OKDINA.'iCES 36. Second reading of Ordi:a::e s~. 523: "An Ordinance of ~~e City of Cu~~rt1no A:endz-t Sec~ion 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by Prezonin¡ a Certain Por~~ of ~he County froQ County ~-8 (Slngle-:~ily Res1den:La: 8,000 Sq. Ft. Lots) Zone to City of Cuperti~o Rl-7.5 (SZ-g'--f~ily Res~dent1al 7,500 s;. f~. Lots) Zo~e; Approx~tely J.~3 Acre, Located Northerly of and Adjace~~ to HetQosa Ave=-e. Ap?roxinately 200 Feet East of Byrne Au,::"e. tI - read DJ' ~or Noel. c-104 Page 19 exation of. rtio::1s of the Ute :iig1way !ieari::g rd. 529 irst 'teading ,~,;;" by CouDcllman Stokes. 8eCOII4I.ð by Councilman Irwin CO bay. -II. Qrdf........ 523 read by Ucla 01117 ad the Mayor'. rudin8 to couC1tute , ''',~' ;;">,' LL~, ',S---" ---"..- ,~, ,," c s... _VIM -'I...... ,'T-' ' . ~< t ,", '", C:C-104 Pale 20 " "Ord. 523 'SecOlld - ~. Ord. 523 enacced ?r.:;-erty ...~ ?o;taè. a::';;' ad..:er:i~~ 4_ .:.i!.·.·spJ.i'~r"i" Rec;·~est <!_i ed . . 1IUI1T1£S OP THE FEBIWAD 7, 1972 UGULA1l CITY COUNCIL HEETUG 1j<, : CouDcill:len nupraW. J'nl1cb. IniD. Stokea. Kayor 1Ioe1 :R_ HottøG carried, 5"( eel by Councilman Scoka. secoDdeel by Councihlan Irwin to enact d1nance 523. Counc1ben Piul.raId, Frol1ch, Inin, Stokes, Ksyor Noel None . . MDUo:1 carried, 5-0 37. Second reading of Or¿~ce 1(0. j24: "A.~ Ordinance of the City of Cuper~1~o ~end1ng Sectio=. 1 of Crdinance 1(0. 2 by lleclassifying a Certain Portion of t~e C~:y of Cupertino fr~ Rl-l~ (S1n;le-fa~1ly Residential IO,JOe S;. Ft. Lots) Zone to R2-4.25i (~~plex 1les1den- ~ial 4,~50 Sq. Ft. Per ~òe:l1ng Unit, I!e~ght Re3~r1cted to One S~ory a~~ ~ot to Exceed Sixteen Feet) Zone; A?proxL~te:y 3.92 Acres, Loca~ed Sasterly of a=.d ñdjacent to ~~ine Av~nue; B~u~ded on tåe Eas~ b:: Stevens Fre....ay and on the South by J,.~.i?ero Serra Freeway." - read ty Mayor Noel. ~e Director of Ad~inistrative Services read a letter fr~ Xrs, Shirley '~eil: requesting she =e given t~e opportunity to 3pea~ on t~is ~ac~er. ~yor ~oel asked t~e Ci:y ~ttorney if there i~ anything t~e Council can '0 abou~ t~is at this peint. ~ere åave been duly advert~sed public ~earing3 on tåis. Tne Ci:y Attorney said it is t~e prerogative of the _ity Council, Mrs. O'Seill -aid the property ~as not posted. The lrector of ?:anni~g a~¿ De~elo~=eat said ~enber3 of t~e sta:: posted igns on Dece::lber 17, 197: and in addition, it ,:as in tr.e ,...,:spapers. Ja:nes Od£, IJ249 3arranca, said he wal;,s by this ;>ropert)' every ay and did ~ot see a~y pos:1ng. ved by Counc11can Sto£es, seconded by Councilcan Frolich to deny the equest. C'1uncllmen Fitzgerald, Frol1ch, Irwin, Stokes, !~ayor :¡oel NJne Motløn carried, 5-0 . . _,;1:.5 OF 'IH£ Ft3RUARY 7. 1972 CITY COUllCIL MEETING d. 524 ecend Rudina &..... by Counc~bln Stokes. øcoDdecl by CouDcilman Frolich to baYe ."'..'I(e 10. 52,. reld by title ODly and the Mayor's relldiD¡ to I:1tute the Second ÞadiDI. ....: -.s: CoulldlJlleD F1taaeÞl!l. Frol1cb. lrv1ll. Stokes. MaJor Bod Noae Hot1oß eaq1ed. 5-0 ._eo! by Counc~l::an Stoites. seconded by Councll::um Frol1ch to e88C~ Ordinance ~o. 524. rd. 524 enacteé AYES : ~: Council::en Fiuseral:!. Frol1ch. I~71n, Stokes, Mayor Keel !lone Hotio::a carried, 5-0 3ð. Second rea~i~g of Ordinance So. 522: "~~ Ordinance of the C1t~ of Cu~er:1~o A=ending Secti~ 1 o! Ordinance 1(0. 2 b¡ llecla5s~ fy1ng a C~rtain ?ort1on cf t~e City of Cu?ert1no fro= 1l3-2.2 (Mal~i~¡e R's~¿ent1al 2,J)= S;. Ft. Per ~~elling Unit) ~ne to Al-43 (S~ng¡e-f~ily A¡r1cult~ral-Residential One-Acre Lots) Zone; Ap?r:x~~ately 13 Acres Located at t~e ~es~ern Terminus of Voss A·..e~ue." - read :'y Ma)·or Noel BC9ed by Co~n~~:=.3n 5~okes, seccn¿ed by Council=an Irwin to r.~/e er:~ance 1(0. 522 read by ti~le only and t:.e }!a:;or's reading to cø=.st1tu~e t::e 5eoo:-.d Read1nl. rd. 522 eco:'1-:i "Rea¿i:1¡ AYES: Co~~ci:=en Fit~ser.ld, Frol1c~, Irwin, Stokes. Mayor !loel None SJI£S : HDtlon carried, 5-0 ~.. Voss, in t::e audience, requested the Mayor read t~e letter ~t this. She ~as told she could coce up and read i~ during the Itreak in t:,e ::eetins. ~ City Attorney said the Urgency Ordinance would t~<e precedence _r Ordinance 522. Once Ordinance 528 expires, Ordinance 522 ~d require ."other First Reading. Tne City Attorney said the lecter in quest1~n should not be considered any more than a ~tten c~uni=ation. rd. 528 takes recedence over rd. 522 cc-_ . p... 2Z ~:-~,~-6t-r %' 6 'f~. "j > orc!. 52Z af~u Ite: " 90-day in:er= :-r:'. Ord. 522 rewJ "::I). t1tl~ =ly Orci. 528 enacted II . or TIlE rEBBIJAU 7. 1972 JEGULAJl CITY COUNCIL MEETØG 111 CaIm~n..... StokeS. ..waded by cOuncilman ImD to recei". I11III l1e De letter frcr.a IanIra Þðeul Savinas aDd LoaD. -, Cøauc1lmeD nupSat4. !'roUch, Irvin, Stokes, Mayor JIoe1 .,. · · · · JiJdøII carried, 5-0 ed by CoImc1lmaD Stoø.. eecouded by Couøcil::an Frol1ch to place c!buce 322 after A¡'" Itea 39. Iføt10D canied, 5-0 9. Urge~: Crd1~ce So. 328: "An Ordinance of the'C1ty of Cupertino 1le:£t~ to the A;pl~cation of ~nte 3e~10 Ridge 1nter~ ZODiD, Reg'~:ati:ms, an~ Decarins the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect I=e'::'st~1.y. II _ read ~y !"...a¡or Noel. s. Vo., &S~ed about this, saying t~e County j~st put a 90-day 1ntert= rd1nan:e :n t~1s. She ~as :old ~he City is :o::~J1n; suit. o~nc1:=.a~ st~~es asked a=ou~ the pro~erty at the end of Lin~y Lane. ~e Pla~~~; Director aaid ~t is in the County. o~nc1:=an =rolic~ asked -:hat is re~u1red ~1ti an Urgency Ordinance. ~e C1~y A::orney said t~ere is no public ~ear1ng, anci it i8 no lonser eq~1r£d t~t ~~ey be read in full. ved by ~~nc1l:an Sto£es, seconded by Cou,.c1:~n Frol1ch to have rd1nar.ce 5:3 read by title ~ly. :~;nci:Cen Fitzgerald. Frol1ch, Irvin, Sto~es, Mayor Noe: S,:~ )'.otion carried, 5-0 ed by Cc~c1:::an Stokes, seconded by Cou.:c11::an Frol1ch to enact d1nance ~. 328. Cc~~il=.en Frol1ch, :r~in, Stokes, ~~yor Noel ~~c1l::an Fitzgerald ~btioD carried, 4-1 uncil::ar. F:':zgerald explained his "No" vote ..as because he is gainst cora:~r1~. -. .'...,.....,.-...,-.. , e dl. OF THE ....7"..~ 7. 1972 ~ CITY COL~C1L ~TTING ~104 Page 23 c,,:'t~:'~ '~ ~.. r:r~..:.~~a~;;;.~. 522 (See page 21 of the.. ",. """;,,, "., "- Yø~'::'- , ,/,;' ,Íccm.idera:.:e C15c¡sa1on 011 this ~cer. it vas :oønc! by P Fro:-:'". saccøled by Co f1- Stokes to defer the of or.---:e Jo. 522 tmU1 die JlØC _et~DI· Ord. 522 euact:llenl deferred co next ...Uq ~J.,.~ "'-~'~ t " it' Counc::':= !':'oUch, Irv1A. SC~.. Mayor !loe: Cou~~-'~ Fitzgerald o Motion carried. 4-1 - -rICX{S 4oG. SIt. 3204: 'L::.=:,,:1on of t:~e City Counci: ;:>= :',~ City of Cõqert1n~ .'__~; .=; Corta:n C:a~ atrl Dca:l~. :~:' .-,:. 1:1 t~e ~nts a~: :=:~ ::~ Fun~s as ~ere~~ai~er D;~~~:;!; =~r Salaries C~ ~;~: :~r the ?ayro:: ?eriod E~~:~~ :1~'~ry 25. ¡'972." - :-~L.: ; - :':~asurer Fro: :c~. !lølre: ~y Cou:::__-.i"': :::Á~s, secon:1e:: ~;''1 Cou:1cil:"'~:l .r.:':: to adopt Res. 32:'':' .....::.rt1o:! No. ' ~:., adC'p~e" ~: 2E5: Cou~:_~~ :::=gp.rald, Fro¡1c~. Ir~1n, St~~!~, ~£yor Noel NO:1e Motion carr ~e-!, 5-0 41. So. 3205: ,i.u.::"tio:! of r:-.e C1:7 Counc1: 0: t:.. City of c.pert1n~ L.:-.-:~ Certa1n C:.&::.::.s _:i Dr.und, :-a:a::. b the .a:»'.¡nts &:'; == ""' :,~e Fun¿i; as ~ere~f~er DéSC= ::.: = ,or CeDeral ~; ~i~!~:.L-:eOU3 Ex;te=-:.:'tares." - rea': ::.- ::-easurer hol1ch. a. ~ by Coun~:-=.LC õ:~:'es, secot:dK ::7 Counc1i:::a,. -...bzt1o'\ :iC'. :.::;. ._....¡- ..." .... to adop~ es. 3205 :iopted ~: .-:5: Co~~.:~= :::zgerald, Fro:~h, Irwin, Sto~." Yayor Noel None Mot~on carried. 5-0 1:1:-104 hp24 ~. 3206 ariaptecl 1.=.... 3210 1-.:~:.eci d 3211 --.:;ttec. 0-".>. 3212 l.:.=?ted . . or THE F'~""'" 7, 1972 J:ECULI& CITY COUNCIL !ŒETIIC .".... 3206: -J. 1es01uticm of tile C1C7 Council of the City of " - _ rtino JIe:::ariq Its IDteac eo Adopt a Houstns E1cent of t~ ~. - ,rü PJ..a ?riør to. Juue n. 1f72._ - re8d by Mayor Roel. ,117 Coi..'..i1-.r.t Iron. seœß¡J~ .,. CouDcilaan Frol1ch to lIdopt n Bo. 3ZQQ. Moticm c:ardeoI. s-o . JIlt. 37.:C: -.\ 1esoluticm of the C~ty Council of the City of Oapert1no k::::'''r~ziq the ÞecutioD of an Agrel!!:ent Between ~ Coun~y =: 5a~ta Clara aad the City of Cuperti~o Relative UI Street ~::::.:-.a~ce progr_, 1972-73." - read by Mayor Boe1 ¿ ~y Coun.:::.:-..¡:: :-:~:ich. 3C:"'::'~io:t ~:o. :':::'. ~. k--- seco~ecI ~y Counc11~:: 5to~es, to adopt =-C: Coun.:::._~~:: :::zgerald. Frolich. Irwin, Stc~e$. Mayor Noel None ~ot1on carriee. 5-0 ~. 3211: A ,:>~~ution of t~e City Council c: t~e City of :'~pertir.c 7:~';:'::~; In:or--.a.t1o;¡ :':1 Co~pliance '.,::'::-: t~e E:tviro~- ::.ental Q'u.~,:" ,,:: of 1~7() for R&~...est1ng Gra';e ôe,arat10n FU:lds !cr the I~~:1__3:~:~ of a Gra¿e Ee~aration 0V¿r~aJ5 at t~1e Point 7~ere Ta:::i.~ .'.;~~''':''- Crosse3 Sta~~ i.oute 28:1. tI - t'~.:1:: by :'~::or ~oel. ~~ ty COU~::~=4~ :::lich, seconded by Council::a:¡ 5:o~es, to adopt 1:"':10:. :¡~. :-~:. , ~~tion carr1e¿, 5-0 ~. ~. 321:: A ~=5~:~tion of t~e C~~y Co~nci: ~f t~e City of Cu?ertir.o A.:J~::.orlzi-:.; : : ':::y ~1a~ager to Z4e:cute DocU:::~:::'j :cor Obta'::li:1¡ ž~:lcial .1-'i:.,:..,.:e Under t~e Federal C~vil :-~~e,.>e Act." - read ~ Mayor S:¿~. :;'I"!d by Cou,,::~~..i:' £:~"es, seco:u!ec! b;¡ Council::a,. Fr:l~c" to ":!O?t -~tion Kc. :~~:. ~otion carried, 5-0 . . . lWIun;S OF TRE mlWAKY 7, 1972 IEGULAll CITY COt'NC1L MEETING CC-104 Page 25 ~ ' I '..'. 1IIIFDIISBED !Iusmo;s ~",. ','. '!' ¡.!,'" 46. Rone DV BUSINESS t·, 47. Coufir:3ation for proposed aøøeSSJ:IeDt agaiust Weed AbatetleDt expenditures. <a> Resolutio~ No. 3216: '"A Resolution of the City Cou.~ci1 of t~e City of ~pertino praiiding for Lien Asses~ents a::d for the Collectio~ of Sa::Ie llesultin¡ FrCl:1 the Abat~- :lent of Public Nuisances." - read 1>y }!ayor 1(oe1. Moved by Co~nc1l:lan Stokes, seconded by Council:an Fitzgerald to adopt Res~:u:io~ ~o. 3216. Res. 3216 ado;>ted Motion carried, 5-0 48. Pro;>~sa: for Boundaries and Sphere of Influence. The City !'..:>.ager referred to his Februal"}° 4, 1912 r:e"o. 49. Proposed A,end~ent to the County General Plan (Parks and Recreatio,. E:e~nt>. The Par~s and llacreation Director referred to his =e:o of February .:, 1972. CONSENT CA!.£:m.u 50. Resol~t~on ~o. 3208: "A Resolu~1on of the City Council of t~e City of Curert1no Making Its Order Descr~bing t~e Bo~ndar1es Desig~ted as 'Stevens Ca:yon 71-14' to be A.~nexed to t~e City L~d Or!ering Anncxations to the City Witho~t Public Hearing as Prov~¿c.;! bj- Law." 51. llesolu~1on ~o. 3209: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Cu;>ertino Accepting a Street or Road Known as Mercedes Road Into tàe City Street Systen.·' ClC-104 .... 26 Coltseat Calendar approved . . OF 'lIIE FEBKUAØ 7. 1972 JŒGULAR cm COUNCIL ~I.uIG . Iaaolut1o:1l0. 3213: -. "olutton of the City Couaell of tt. City of Cçenillo kceptiøa;~1cation of Ileal Property for 1øadv&J Pur- ~ froa the StCl"'-.... ....lopaent Corporatiou; Approx1aataly 0.204 Acre Locate4 AI.... tile Wasterly Side of !fary Ave_e lortharly of Stneus Creek ,11vd.- ) 30 1I:solut1o:11o. 3714: -. Jlesolutton of the City Council of the City of Clpert11lo Af·provfDs :'FiAal Plan for the l:¡provlment of !'rODt.._ AtOll¡ Mary Avenu.' aDd St..,ens Creek Blvd.; Authoriztng t!1e City E:1g1Deu to Sig:1 ':he FiDel Plan; and A:.1thoriz1ng ExecutiOD of A¡ree:MDt in Co:llwct1on therewith. n -4. Res~:utio~ No. 3215: "A Keoslution 0: t~~ C!ty Council of tbe City of Ca:er:i~o Y~king Its Order DeGcr1b1~g :~e B~u~dar1e~ Designated as 'Eer=csa 71-15' to be ~nexed to t~e City and Ordering Annexations to t::'e C~:y Without Public Hearing as Frovided by ).avo" ~~ed b7 C~=,il=.an S~o~s, seconded by Coun,ilnan 1rrln to adopt the nsent Calo!::!ar. Mo~iOl1 carried, 5-0 ?ORT or êFFrcERS City S:aH e City Atto~ey said he h.¿ received a let tor fro~ ~he Depar~e~t of us~ice. A!tor 16 ooat~s' litigation, both app~ications ~ere denied, ¡¡holding t::! C~pct1no Cit7 Cou:1cil àeci,ioas. he Director of Ad~1~1strat17e Services su~~itte1 a report on cash ayca~ts :c .a~lco Par.~ i~~rov~ents, as re,uest~d by t~e Cc~nc1¡. ac Director of Administrative Services stated there are fifteen a~dirlat~$ :or the next election. ae D1re~:or of Aænln1strat~ve Services asked the City Coanc1l to ppropriate a¿¿it1onal expenditures to ta~e aùvantage of s~~ Federal unds fcr sa=~~y 1te~s: $2,540 for four rec0rdin& traffic counters nd $900 i~ ve..icular :Üleage. . e - IIUI11rES OF THE FEBllUAI!' 1. 1972 REGULA1l CITY COlmCIL HEEtIJlG . So aoved by Councll:un Føllch. seconded by CouncU- Stokes. " "'" ~, ADS: -.s: Coundben F1tzpnU. Frolich, Irdn. Stokes. lfaJor Noel Hone ;.: ØDeIoD carried, 5-0 56. City Councll::en JIo reports. 57. Recog~ìtion by }~yor of ~on-aganda ite~s. Since Fe~. 21st is a ~o¡~ay, t~e next Council ~eetir.g vill ~e on the 22nd 0: F~~ruar1. AD.JOUR:;~'\1' Par~s an¿ Rccr~ati~n C:~ir-~ Ga~r1e1 as~ed t~at t~~ ~¿jo~r~ad nee~ing O~ :z~ruary 8t~ cJ~¡¿ ~e he1~ at 3 ?M ratner :~a~ ï:30 ?M. Moved :'y C.':mci:~an 5to",te~, s2con¿ed b)" Cou~cil,"an 1r-...ir: ::> adjour. t:c ~eet:~b t~ S p~, Ta~s~a:9 7~~r~ary S, ¡972 in ~~e Ccu~ci~ (;;:a:::ber. T,,~s ::Ièeting adj=r~ed at 11 :503 P~I. Kotioc carried, 5-0 APPROVED : . /s/ ~lyde L. Noel Mayor, City of Cupertino ArrEST: /./ VIII. E. Ryder City Clerk. CC-I04 rage 27 Funds appropriated