CC 03-21-72
-.
\
'~;)i: "'!""'·'~-''''·
.~'
.
..
,
e
-
CIIJ or wrCJd1!1O, State of Califcmúa
'.""" Torre Av_e, CuperUJIO. Ca11fom1a
-....~e: 252-4505
,.ç¡
.&:{, .
"~;'.',.:
'1~: :~
(';Ii ;i
J:i');;' 'r, "~, '
M,i~;:,:p "JllìuS OF THE UGUI.&R' ADJOOJ,..... hmIHG or THE CIn COUICIL
, . ' , HELD HAlCH 21. 1972. III THE COUIICIL CHAHBEI
. " CIT! BALL. ~IIIO. c.u.IFOIRIA
'¡¡;
.;rOJ: Noel called the aeeUJlI U» order at 7 :07 PH.
CoaDcillllen present: ritzlerald. Frol1cb, Irvin, Stc.ltes. Mayor Noel
Coals Commit:ee Members present: Anger, Cooper, C;onzales, !!all,
Hirscbfeld, Nellis, llice.
Cbait1D!ln Karpen
Suff Members present: City Manager ~inlan
Director of Administration Ryder
Director of Planning and Development Sisk
Y-~e D1rect~= ~f Administrative Services intrcduced tbe matter
carried o~er fram the Council mee~ing the prcvious evening in re-
lard to ~he ,ont1ngency claim request by the County in the off-
chance that rhe trans1~ district is not voted in. The staff's
recommenda:i~ was that tbe City Manager be authorize1 to file
...ch cla1c.
So moved by Councilman Stokes. seconded by Councilman Irvin.
Motion carried, 5-0
Mayor Noel suggested the Chair=an of tbe Goals C0m01~tee begin the
review of the RepOrt.
Qairaan Karpen noted that the Iteport bas been reviewed and sug-
.astions ba~e been ..de by ~be various Commissions and Committees.
.. requested by ~he City Council. The Steering Committee feels
chat the goals are needed JIOV. with all the pellÓ1ng development
-.I the Ge!leral Phø r."iev _ 10 process. He asked tbat the
Goal. eo.,ittee ll.port be adopted by tbe City ss 600n as posaible
.. the official policy of the tity of Cupertino.
eo.øcilun Irvin noted that the ttae has cOllIe to knit togetber the
_1&iDltl Report, taU.. into conaideration the opinions and rec__
'ations of the co..i..ions aød Commi~tee.. He noted ~ha~ tbe
POUP. represent a varied back&round. He sul&es~ed a 3-bour time
1JII1t be placed on the d~.1on at this .e.ting and continue
_tber ni&h~ if llac..aary.
. c, '.. I
CC-I09
Page 1
City Mgr.
authorized ~o
file con~1n¡;enC)'
claim
Steering Coc:n.
su¡;¡;es~ed Report
be adop~ed as
Official Pol1c>'
of the City
~1t tOlather
~he odllnal
Itepor~ and the
sUlgestions of
others
i
t
,
I,
'e
e
œ TO AD.J0UII-.m1lGØLØ MD'1'IlIG OF TO CITr WVIICIL HAICII 21. 1972
'""',,
.
, ,
n.a frolich......é.t t."t"l another step firsts
> -",
~:.' ,,"
n. c-.--n c:oa1d'~..t ad receive theleport .. pres.ted ..
tbeD fIOCeeel lIIWe Or,l... on their ow tilllilll eccordilll to the
deane of iIIport.œ.'ad/or IIrlenCJ·
The Cauaell could try to 10 through the Report Daecliatel1 ..
r_e controversial it_ alii! theø put their stamp of approval
on the Report.
2.
The Counc:ll could try to arrive at _e ~e80lution that the Coab
Coaaittee and Cit1 COuacll are basically in agre..ent and accept
the aeport on tbat basis.
yor Noel asked Chaitll8l1 Karpen's opinion. Mr. Karpen said be hoped
the problcs could be resolved. He did not want ~ review every Une
f ~he Report a~ this tise because 1~ is very ttce-consuain~. He would
prefer the Council establish a baseline to proceed to a~opt a Policy for
the City.
Council:an Stokes noted tha~ this Goals C~ittee was originally
~stabliShed to put together the policies of the City to see what kind
of city in Io'h1ch they want ~o live. !Ie said rol1cies can be c:,anged
by ~he ver~ same group who establishes policies. These will be guidelines
f ~a~ the public thinks, to be used by the staff an~ consultants.
¡Chairman Karpe~ agreed. He believes it "oul~ be better to have a
IC1~y set of goals rather ~han a citizen set of goals anended by the City.
It was then ¿ec1ded the groups would go over the report, page by page,
¡nd differences of opinion would be discussed and resolved.
age 3. Goal 1, Policy 2 shall now read:
'The General Plan should be subject to a five-year review by an ad hoc
coaa1ttee. "
shall now read:
'Prior to, or concurrently with consideration of ~he zoning request an
pplication should be ..de to &mend tbe General Plan, with ~he decision
e1ng made by tbe City COuncil after rec~endation by the Planning
158100."
le~e Policy 9 b.
·'
.
_u.:. OF THE ADJ. IEGUIAll KEETIIiG OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3/21/72
CC-I09
Page 3
)t.
.,.".~¥i.:"" .,~t,~';.";~{,~"
",~, <~;Goall. ~:lcJiL,~'~.~W:
ftlr';a- Uœ ':. '::..~£~.::. ..~:::;
.,:;,\-,·,i "
.... 14. Goal t. Policy 7: Delete b.
'1,";
,j; ,
.:: 'c;,,'i
~}'·,~l' .
';¢~1~ :-
,<þ
,
.,
1, .
.... 14. Policy 8 shall read:
'"I.ea1alative action at all levels should be encouraged to provide
C8K relief and other incentives ~ preserve agricultural and sc.ni
l...s. "
Delet. 8Ubparag~a'~$ a and b.
Page 17 to be restujied and resolved at the n~~t neet1ng.
hge 18, Goal II. Pelicy 8 shall reed:
-rbe Cuperti~c C1:y Council and staff should seek development of
lcov and moden:e 1::~ooe housing in the City, ~ased on a coord1nat
C-ty effort."
Page 19, Goal II:. Policy 13 shall read:
-Iuv..tigate a~ seek ~o for. a Housing Agency, on the Coun~y
1....81. to provide t~e followioa s.rv1ces: "
.... 20, Goal III, Policy 13 d. shall read:
-a..elop and enforce the use of a ~el lease and/or rental
ear_·nt."
.... 27, Goal IV, PoUcy 7 c. shall read:
-Conv.rs1on of residential structures to c~ercial use."
..",> '....~
I"
,
e
or tE W. REGULt& ~.LJIIj or THE CIn COUNCIL 3/21/72
;33. Goal I. roliC7 2 "--11'1 reM:
."~
~J¡I--t.. JRIr" d...e1:J.~ 18' CODjac:tioD with locà1. ~l 41atdcC..-
,: ," . ~Ci14~~~~ ' ' '
, '" ce c1C7 caap~" .: ' ftth .aequre IlUpeJ:Vbi-,· ,
, "~"?:,, ~~~\"~Hf,,~,),,:~,~"'" '
.~.~' ",h
'". Goal I. 1'o11cy'is-> D-t-.. b. aað c. " ":
34. Goal I, Policy" tI. sba1l reacl:
: of a drul 1BfoI:DatioD cba-1 vithtn the Clty.-
";: The .ee--' ._cence sball !)ecOlÌle Pol1C7 5 a.
.e 34, ec.: :1, Policy 7 is vichdrawn for re~ons1deracioD.
34, ?::~:1 8 shall readr
City s.=-~:~ include park l&nd acqu1s1ti~:1. development, and
inCc:.1ance ~:: ~ts five-y~r c.a;o1t&1 impr:>ve<:en: progrlCls."
35, c::a:. ::, FoUcy 13 ~11 read:
e City s~~:i strive to acquire properties ~n the Stevens Creek flood
F: 3:~ :',:O.:::.:~ :o:l:::~:::~':::."<k "",0."
¡Page 40, ~.¿: :. ¡'ollcy 3 s~:l read:
~suffic1e"'::T :uge amounts .:>auld be aFpr",ri3:ed fr01ll the General Fund
~or purc~s~~ outside services or for su.~r::ng eventual local servIces
liD or.der :: ,=:vide quality police service."
, '
a.e 40, ~: :, poUcy 4 ~ !)e reworded anJ =......iewed at the D_~ .eat1ng.
¡
I
I
i
.
,
.
.
1111IUTES OF .~ AD.). RECULU!!IG I)F TIlE CITY COUNCIL 3/21/72
.... 43, Go&! 1, Policy 1: Del.t. c and d.
~,>"')~;~~~;':',",'::" ":::,.':','" - ,'~
~{~;'.f¡~ 43, Goal I, Policy 2: Delet. a.
~,.!'';':''¡ß-ili~.:>·.
t,1?~~.,~,..,~¡IJ,~"~",M¡t'" 43, Goal 1, Pol~~,'~" ahøl1cI read:
.,,< "<":'J{J.::>;",~ . ,,",,,t ':!It', ", ..'
, i, ;, ",·'~,.yt',.",· 'lID early cœpletio1l'of the Torr. A"..., Tantau A,,__ aDd
~';f,1Iii9 __ Qftrcro..1Dp of the Junipero S.rra Fre_y.-
'.-', ".",7,'
", '~',. ,. '"
f'
~
,
~.
.... 45, Go&! Ill, Policy 7 sboald read:
'"rbe City cf Cupertino .boald support regional plannins of ....
transit sys:eas with local citizen par~1c1pation in the plannins
proce.s."
Pase 45, Geal III, Policy 13 should read:
"Th. City s~uld provide a bicycle network, with separate bicycle
paths where :~as1ble, to connect residential areas wi~h places of
work, sc~~:., parks and sbops. Cooperation with the Coun~y
.hould be 1U~:lta1ned for extension of the system to County areas."
Page 49, Gc.al I. Policy 2 shculd read:
"rhe Ci~y '-"",,,cil should abide by previous dec,1sion. by the voters
aod sho"lè ~::ec~ no "ontrary ac~rons w1~:.out a new popular vote
or a pub¡:~ =~aring to determine if the factors had chan¡ed suffi-
ciently t~ :l~: require a vote.
Pase 49, Cc,¿l I, Policy 3 should delete the word. "~ax rat." and
replace ....i:':>. :he word "budg.t".
Pas. 50, c..~~ 11, Policy 8 should read:
"Frior ~<.' :::.~ budget hearin¡ for ..tabU.b1ns any new City depare-
_t, tbe Ci:y Council _"-lei bold pubUc: bearillls to d.reraine th
aeed for ~ ~bjective. of aDY new proposed deparc.ent."
CC-I09
Page 5
,.
e
e
OF THE ADJ. I1!CtJI,.U IIIC or THE CITY COUNCIL 3/21/72
... SO. c:oallI. .olSc7 10 trill b. reconsidered at the øøt .etiDI·
",:~~:·:~¡;;\"",;:3-:'-,~~:',t~,:~· j' ";:,;-
51. GoalUI'..~ftâJ;. . ~~**er Goal 111 sball "i'''Ñ~.
" ')l\~;1f:jii,!t . . .
-. 52. Goal~it~~~~,~ .' ", .;tetened to tba cui Ât~.
::~' lr,;/;,:;·,.'j:,:,,~,~ ,:/,'
, 'v:'. ,.,"',' }:
a.. 52. CoalII1..oÌiC7Ì4;~.r aubperasrapb a. 'dÌe Worel ".joIDecI"
11 be deleted aait up1....... vith the word "mdtacl",
age 53, Goal III, Policy 16 to be reworded by the.Goals CoIø1ttee.
age 57, Goal 1 shall read: "TO HAUlTAIN SOUND FINANCIAL POLICY"
57, Goal I, Policy 3 shall be reworded.
age 57, Goal 11, Policy 5 shall be reworded.
age 53, Goal 111 shall read: "TO MA.'!AGE A.'!D CO:''TROL T!iE CITY' 5 FINANCIAL
FFAIRS THROUGH YEARLY ~" LONG RA.'!GE FlSANCIAL PLANNING."
age 58, Goal III, Policy~: Delp.te the last sentence.
age 61, Goal I shall read: "TO 3E A CITY OF u:nCII ITS RES IDEt.'TS AllE
ROUD 1..,1> TO WI!1CH ITS SEICH30llS GIVE RESPECT"
oved by Councilman Irvin, seconded by Councilman Stokes to adjourn the
eeting at 1:40 A.M. to Tuesday, March 28, 1972 at 7:30 P.M.
HDtioD carried, 5-0
Respectfully submitted,
~->~_"o-..l-.)
Recording Secretary