CC 04-03-72
.
íØ,
/(J. ~ /
.
CITY OF CUPERTINO, State of California
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California
Telephone: 252-450S
IURUTES· or 'TIll IEGIJI.B HEETING OF THE CITY' aJUNCIL
íIEI.D ÀF1lI1. 3. 1972 IN THE COUNCIL c:IIAHBEIl
CIT! BALL. C1IPE1lTINO, CALIFORNIA
SALUTE TO THE FlAG
The mee~1ng was called to order at 7:31 PM by Mayor Noel with the
Salute to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Counciloen present: Fitzgerald, Irwin, Stokes, liayor Noel
Counciloan absent: rrolich
Staff present:
City Manager Quinlan
City Attorney Adams
Director of Administrative Services Ryder
Director of Plannin~ and Developoent Sisk
Direc~or of Parks and Recreation ~utler
Assistant Director of Public ~orks Viscovich
Recording Secretary Lois Inwards
mNUTES OF PIU;V10US MEETINGS
l(a).
Approval of Minutes of adjourned regular mee~ing of
March 28, 1972.
Moved by Councilman Fitzgerald, seconded by Councilman S~okes to
approve ~he Minutes of Karch 28, 1972.
Motion carried, 4-0
l(b).
Approva! of Minutes of adjourned regular meeting of
Karch 21, 1972.
Moved by Councilman Irvin, seconded by Councilman Fitzgerald to
approve the Minutes of March 21, 1972.
Motion carried, 4-0
CC-lll
Page 1
3;28/72 !:inutes
approved
3;21/72 minutes
approved
.
.
CX:-IU
bee 2
¡
S OF tIlE APllIL 3. 1972 C11"l COUNCIL MEETI1IC
Approval of IUJDcee fl«" ~eplal' ...t1D& of IfIIrdl 20. 1972.
iby Coa-f1.-.. 'r,ltI;..~~,~ed b1 Cowell.. Imalt' ,to
'>. the !UDUte. of tfiRit2øl1972.
," .. :,;', .," ,'"
~; ~/>,~ ',:-<:>;;¡~' .
~, ' Hot1GaåløÜd. 4-0
.
.
í
ICATIO.'IS
2. Vdttea
a. Advice from the City of Campbell on their referral to the
In~er-City Council. the Bay Area Pollution Control District's
proposed amendaents to Regulation No, 2.
b. Recr"ô!st from the £leccrical Contractors' Assoc1a~1on of
S3nta Clara Valley for prompt adoption of the 1971 ~ational
Ele~trical Code vit:h øin1cal amendments.
c. Res:lutions froc tbe cities of Creenfield and Gilroy i~ support
of :~e San Felipe .ater Project.
I
I
d. A.:v~~e from Cotln<;itnan Hayes of San Jose in opposition to the
5a= Felipe ~ater ?roject.
e. Re~~e$t from the Sierra Club for a pu~lic he3ring a~ which
C'rF$it'on to the ?roject could be eXi'ressed.
f. Re~~es: from Attor:ey De2pster tn3t his a¡>peal to Planning
C.:-c=i;;sion's decislcn on 3..TM-72 be heard concurrently wi~h
C~u~~~l review of 3-C-72.
g. AJv~~e froQ S~ate ~par~=ent of Public Wor~s on apport1~en~s
0: Ca:iforn1a's Federal TOPICS funds.
h. Rô!~~est from the Yoaen's Auxiliary of the Tri-Cit1es Little
League for a perait to hold a flea market at Portal Shopping
Cer.~er, Stevens Creek Blvd. and Portal Avenue.
.
1.
R~"est from, ~he Cupertino de Ora Club for the City Council to
declare their buildlng as a historical land~~rk, whic~ act is
cla!~ej as being necessary for 3 reduction in property taxes.
;. Ora Club
"Hter refe=~
:: the s~aff
Moved by Cou=c~l!:lan Stokes, seconded by Ccuncilman Irwin to refer ~he
de Ora Clu~ ~tter to the staff.
Motion carried, 4-0
",.,,.,..,~ -
I
.
__illS or T1IF. APUL 3. ~912 CItY COUHCIL MEETING
.....t fro. Job 1.1 ' -.ø.ber. Board of Directors.
!r1-ciUea Uttla ,- ¡--foe-the City Council to prQClaia
die period of April ~' öiø..ah Kay 6th as "Little 1eal1le
i( 1reeJtI'. $
Wtft' fro. the s-føor..i ~..ldent of Oalt Keadows. askiDl
tile City to accepe .....,.~... of the parll: lands.
..... 117 Co;mcl1aan Stokes. aT ..ad by Councilman Irwin to hear
.,.l1caUou )-121-72 aad 3-V-12 uaether.
IIDtioa carried. 4-0
..eel by Coun.:il:'lan '1~a¡:eraU, seconded by Councilman Stokes to
approve ~he r.~it for the Trl-Cltle.' Ll~tle League flea marke~
to be held at :.:real Sbopp1q Ceftter.
CauDcilman :~~:~ stated ~~.at alt30agh these ~hing. are worthwhile,
they C&ll bec.:",,, a prohle:.>. Be a.;c.d the City !'Ianager to c!leck ~hi
_to
!lotion carr~ed, 4-0
!laved by C.:u~:: :=n Stoke... .econded by Councilman Irwin to
proclaim t.", ,a :.:>d '_pr~¡ 29t:: t~rou&h !'lay 6th as "L1~tle League
Veek.··.
!lotion carried, 4..0
h. Kayor ~e: stated he had received a letter from Cupertino's
Sister .i::r. Copertlno. Italy. asking for financial ass1stane
in the re5t.:>rat1oD and repair of the local church organ. He
fel~ ta&t 1t would be in ørder to ask for a..istance on this
throulb the news media aDd tbe staff.
So aoved by C~ncilllaD 5 to"" , seconded by Councl1aan Irvin.
!lotion carried. 4-0
iDwed by Council:an Stokes. s.c~éd by Councilman Irvin to refer
die Oak Mude'olS matter to the auff and the Parks and Recreation
cc...iss1on fer coaaents.
..",ed by Coundlaan S~okes, secoa4ed by Councilman Irwin to with-
__ the above :ot1on because the person from Oak Meadows was not
Jet present at the meeting.
Motion carried. 4-0
CC-111
Page 3
.
3-TK-72 &
3-U-72 to be
heard together
Flea ~Iarket
approved
April 29 -
~ay 6 proclai"O'"
Little League
\leek
Assis~ance
requested fro""
news media &
staff fo~
Copertino, Italy
Oak Meadows
lDa~ter deferred
a... 32;'<;
r.->ve<! ~ ~~
tbis ale-.....:a
(ounc. ~u"e.
named Cb&~!1I.aD
for Ju_ ~:ec:.
on tra:>s:'t
dl.trlc~
.
.
IIIIUTES or THE APlIL 3. 1972 CITY COCBCIL IlElTIJIG
e4 by CoaDCÜIUD Stoka. .. C ",...ea '" CoIØICibIaD Irvin to DOt1f7 eM
, w,of superY1lO1'.tbIa'.'- v- r-"--t to Þp1atlCID 10."2 of,tIIa.
~" kea roUat1oD CODUOt'ø.ulet '....'·c1ou Û DOt appropdØe
~t ebb tbM.
-ft"
JIotioD caø1e4. 4-0
!loved by CoaocilaaD Irv1D. sec-". bJ C-Cilll&D Fitzgerald to fU.
eM writteD c_icat1øu.
!IotiOD carried. 4-0
3. Oral eo..unica~ioaa
(a> :lone
(b) Re1ue9t by CouncI~en for r~cval of 1t~l. froM Conseft-
Caltmdar.
t:pon. request tht! th~ Dlr...:t :-:- ~~ ?la:1nlng and Dcv¡.l'Jpr.ten:. lt was r:oved
oy Council",""" gtokes, ..eco::-;ed '0)" Co"nc~l"'an Irwin to rc-oov" Res.,lu~Ion
~o" 3246 ir~ thIs agenda.
Motion :arried, 4-0
ttPORT OF COU:;CIL REPRES":,,-:AT:VES
4. Tran~por~atIoo Policy ~itte" - Counciloan frolIch
Coun"Ilman Frollch has as'~e<i C"unci 1:"13" Stok". to act a, C:,aIman for
CupertIno in tl,c formatIor. of a trar:slt district. Discu,sI"" followed.
5. Planning Polley eo-itt"~ - Cou""cU,,an FItz;;.'rald.
No aeeting.
6. Inter-City CouncIl - ~4yor SO"l
No meeting.
7. League of California CIt ie5 - Hayor No..1
\Jill meet the followln¡ T~"rsday.
.
.
IUJlUTES OF TEE APRIL 3, 1972 CITY COU::Cll. H£ETING
e. Association of Bay Area Governments - Councilman Frol1cb
::i'~. absent f~OII this eounc:ii ..eting.
)::!;"';~f:',~:?,:'
'" ,,'.''¡;; :~r100d Control Advisory ea.ission - Councilman Stokes
'.~",,;>',:~:1.' ",~. .
',.__dng.
~ Santa Clara County Water Commission - Councilman Stokes
Jilt .eeUng.
11. Solid Yaste Committee of Planning Policy Committee -
Commissioner Puetz
JOt present at this meeting.
12. Drug Abuse Committee - Councilman IrwIn
Councilman lr.in r~ported t~e last meeting was devoted largely to
attemp~ing tc resolve where we are going; the opinions of the
priorities \"a=y among the groups represented. !Ie added that be
15 disappointed in the instruction received thus far.
13. ll1l1si¿e Committee - Councilman Stokes
Councilman Stckes deferred to Planning Commission Chairman ~eyers
who reported a discussion between the Cornmit~ee and ~he Santa
Clara County Planners. , Tbere is an attenpt to bave tbem cone
..fore the C.~ittee to discuss the problems. As to the Monte
..110 Road property split, tbe 30ard of Supervisors are now
chinking of approving sl1gh~ly less than five-acre lots if it can
De proved they are buildable lots.
~ING C~~ISS10N
14. Submission of tl1nutes of regular meeting of t~rch 27, 1972.
CC-ll1
Page 5
Pr ~ori: i es to
!>e res"lved
Monte 3e! 10 !to
property split
t
CC-l11
Pal. 6
.
.
JaUUl£S OF r,,¡ !PilL 3, 1912 em œtIIC1L MEETING
"l
:as. Application 4-TK-72 of BIlL c Scllllta to subdivide 1.84+ acr..
'1',' into e1pt (8) Iota. s.u,:'r JTrCJ 18 located veated)' of ...
,~ ,adjaceut to II1llc~..C ~;~, ~t..~tel)' 400 feet IIOrth.d:r of
,;, 'the iDtersec:t1ou of o.~.1 t ,... _ Hillcrest tIDed.
h,', ' :J',,-,",,:,,,, <'''-'¡'-''::,', '.-'
~¡ Oed for .pp~.t,,''''''; ..
"~ømllS Director DOt~';1.¡lî 1Lt~~1oaal)' approved teøta~:
, ,00 this ?Opert., ..),11" ~"aøf1!.;' Council..n Irwio jaU
"~ticed _ diacrepøda'1)Î -'ChI two venious of the UDta-
','.. ..p. The PIlIDnml DiièCw .au tile aecoM revision is 111
~"claDCe with tbe ordi"'-', ,¡
JI-CoDuat
apprøwa1 _
U io .,,1:'1_
dis"".-ei
Amend
Cond. 17 á
delete
Cod. II!
:'-T:,~-72
a¡>pr"'~e<1
w/cC!~.ði::.=
r -illll8n St~1tes asked what... ~-... Condition 18, maUng deve14 -"C
_ this property subject to B {'~ol approval. The Planning Director
_1d this \01&5 ~ecause tbe p~w",.L7 is on . h11ls1de. Council.aD Sco1tes
oõjected on :,,~ grounds that., pcecedent has been set for H-COntrol
~oval on 5i~le f811111y " r 011 10,000 sq. ft. lots.
~ed by C~~,,::l~an Stokes, ~ed by Councilaan Fitzgerald ~o dele~e
all but the ::~5: sen~ence of Coadition 17 and all of CondItion 18 from
~ ?lanni~g ~~ission rec_ ~~~tiOD.
}Iotlon carried. 4-0
~ed by c~~ -c: :::<In Stokes, sec.on<:ecd ~y CouncUn.m Irwin to a;:prove
12;';>liCati~" _-:-:~-;2 with the 11 ",z::.~i~ions as a¡J"n~"d.
,
1
i
I
~. Gene :I?';:-::. represent1::g ~be ¿evelopers. asÌteå ior possible
::-eimburse:"'".i-:".:. ~i~l1cr nov or in t.he future, f(,r e;..;cess!·;t.'! 3treê!t
';':provcmen::. :h~rt! could =.e & ::'et: on the p'oí)i~rty on the do....~hi1.:.
side for ~::" >.1:: street. r""" City Attorney sai¿ ther", ~cu I¿ be an
.a;>plieatic:: :.:< r"i,-"ourse=lent 1£ the City of CUi'ertino :I':opts such an
",..dirmnee. :c~"cilman Stc.kes œ:t :he ¿evelop,'r that he 1~ g2ttin~
tne bene£;.: __ . lots with street i::provetlents alon.; cnly 4 here.
Motion carri.ed. 4-0
.,--
_Co
Applia::~" 3-U-12 of Houar¿ auth, Jr., (.or" ::se P',rmlt to allow
cons:~":::,'n of 41',925 5';G&re feet Of o(fi~e S?"C" 1'1 a l'
(Ph:.,,:-~ 2e'.-elopment) Zoce. Said pro?"rt)' is ["rated at the
nort!-,.-,,,: C0rner of :he i:1~!!rsection o( ra~:':i,-" Drill" and rerre
Aven~e. ~~co~ended for ~1.
I
I
", ""
,
.
.
_U~ 01' THI ....'"1:: J, 1972 C1Tf ClØDllCIL MEETING
.
.'Appl1eatiœ J-Df-72 of ~~~,Jr.. to divide 3.89!
¡ ."l¥~l:'I:;' acn. 1Dto fift (5) lot~"~" SdIJ yt.ótuty 1s located at the
;~i";/~~;¡i.ili,~~;I;:.f ,ìÍôrt~t conK of thé .~~$~l: of Pacifica Drive and
, ',(~'¡<!.iii;".{ " ,;j\ Torre A..._.!tecoaa :~ ::::'."'1. Aclmin1s~rative hear!
, :~ '~'!"<""I' ", '" ." 1IiUed oa ~ applicant'.'; , :rr- the Planning ea.1ssioD
,..f" ",., " .' ~"..,
,'\" ; '~1:; ac1s1011. , j!f¡¡<"
,-,:,._,~,:' ~ ·;\')i~~- ">1..
"'SIie P1aøDing tIi~~= revie¥é4'" 'jiddbits on the b::lletin board
- '''& the bcC:04 envelop"'~~. traffic circulation, the
I wUve map. EO! £ graph1c-- .le of bow the buildings may
._... He IIDte: :::..: the appropriate 8M)Unt of eler>en~s and ex-
Mldu have 1'<': ~,~ provided to ~re a unified a~r:each to the
~ 1nJllllent e: :::':3 !,r~perty. '!2 int.ent of the P~.n:l1n" Com-
siss!on denia. :.s ~:O.a: there sbould be a thread of c=n~inu1ty.
~ey J. R~-::: =~?ster said the reason the a,?>:a:i~n was
~ted in :~:s ~~,.~r is that ~. B=t~ has ha~ i,.:~iri~s fro~
~ous den::s:: ::::Jrs, etc., vbo ~~ulè like to -.il¿ their
"""" building. .. :.'$~coned ..r..et::ler all the :)Ui,3::::s s;,~ulå 100'
2~·k_ in or¿~r :~ ::: into th: 7~~ Ce~ter. usi~~ :~~ ;a:~ Alto
Sari.:>gs, 1~.,1:,·7":;,. ~:archant:'s. a:ci ~be other '~~::5:S' t>ulldin
_ ~a"'pl..s. :< ,~~:; that ...::::' r......i.,... of each ~O':~::~-e::: '>)1 l:,
:'...-n!ng Co"."-:;:..-. :~-Control "0:: City Council, :,<r, ,..ill be nO
~~1~ in c:~:::.~_~; :~e de~e:~ent: of this rr~?,::v. ~., also
~e:: that a:: :" :__:~in¡;s 1~ .es: \-alley Ind",::i?: ?ar;, arc
~ ~he sacco '.=. :e=?stcr sa:; :!r. I.:.¡t:¡ has a::""~': :....:- the
se::bac~s and :....:.:; ~:: ?r~"'posed. pa.r.Li::g .."itldn t:~CS.1 5':~:.1'::('s.
]3.e s.a1¿ he. :::. : ~: ": .i:".J the designer ::et twic~ "..i :~: :h~ ~}lanninb
r..a!f the pr<'; co.' '.¿¿:<.
.!!IIr'. De<:1pster :.::<" :.:.1: there is ""ice a difference ,=,,:·;.'en this
~oposed use :: ::~ ,=aperty and :he Civic Center, ~~<r¿ you have
~le lIIeanl!.: .:.; 1:,:,"t after Gar;'. :e said they ¿:::' t ..ant
~le wande=:~.; i::~J these professional offices a::er dark
-.cause this ::.. ~: ':...:ome a proble=..
~ have Ie:: ~":.,s to the adjacenr property. T~è la,.¿scapin&
éU help tc ::~ ::$¿:her th..se c!ewelopoents. Their int~nt for
~ lands~a.i~ '';:U presenced co the Cit)" Cou'1cil.
~_ B. lluth, ::-.: ':s:eria Courc, _ere<! Council!::.",. Sto:'es that
éiIe driveways ::.::..: ::1 Exhibit A vill ""ist. The !:ucl¿>ngs will
-.e ~o be b~~::..~::Oin ~he build1n& envelope. He a~~ed that he
au JIO~ enur:.;.::: .>::.y notion :0 allov a developer t~ :,uild a
n.a top bui::'~.
tc-lll
Pale 7
JIo insurance
; of cODtiDUi~y
of deve107o=lent
'Ibe prc;>osal
PreCf::;e~:- ha!"o
=een se:.
~o Fa.r~~ng in
5et::a::~:~
Don't \o·:t.~t
peop:e va~'H!er i::,
.~out a~t('r
dar~
Lar.:isca¡>:n;
tie it all
coget:,cr
..:"
. ..
So flat-to~
bull¿ing;s to be
aUo'òed
cc-ll1
t>aae 8
~.
...,,1
_tell. ?
oIeclaioD:
that
::'15 appl.
,-;uld anew
",,,e var1a::;.:m
, ::!',e et~~.
.:~ pro,¡~::.·!:f
, <J~erall :;1:'",.
..:J {v 1dual
... PC1"::',1~
',.{on to
J..·prove
-ij-7Z
, '<.':>:1d1t1c:_
" andCleln
,'t1ed votc
.
.
'~'-.Ba or tIlE .\nIL 3, 1972 C1Tl wCWCIL KEETIIIC
Q-fc'ffoa CIIa1DIIiII'&..~.aoUd chac basically, the ~""',for
" _ QOt becaø..,of".,Widdaal _eubip of the 'buUcUDI. !lac
'tit... --'f. ," ..'~appllcat. to C01I81der a pò"tporll "IIC
-~ CWe for tha cet,·..· ",'~'d.e~.c"ffto consider e1..á~,co'
'prOject tOl.thu'~¥Æ' ~. "', '7~.th.pi&ìll11111 ea.ai.sf.oaer. tbat
",' "',,,lIadltioaa11Dforut~,'~(...~"-,' ";..,.,.t to the City. Hr. u.pac.r
,be did _ car. hov, ttie:¡ , ....,,.-1..108 voted, but be _tell '
.IIÌ¡~~~t.1oa that :üght. 'lbéreftN. ...:receivcd the denial.
i~ ..,
{"" , 1lmaD Stl!Us asked if the p1........' CcDIissioners realized this would
t.r. to CODe »0:£ 1:oefore t~ aad II-CoDtrol. The Planning Dir.ctor .aid
die applicant ,¡an:ed the Us. Pera1t ac thi. tim. also,
, -lll113n l:v:" s-dd he _1d bat. to see this proper~y developed
esactly like ;õe rest of the T~~ Center. He ~uld 11ke to get avay
~~ the r""'.':'"Si e:fect we !>av. t~re now; str1?s "f buildings wl~h
~king 1n ::':'.-, ,,,. ¡Ie ~'Ould like to see so::et!l1ng '.oIl:h a littl.
.,._iat1on. ("".'::l:03n Stokes 5:;1'.1 this app11catio:1 gives us a chance:
:ø I~~ so=e '; 1:: 1: :on.
~;¡.e Plannl;:~ ~:.:o;:.::."r referre~ ~': the :,:.arch 23r¿ staff repcrt ,..hi~h had
~ :ist or S-f~'::~~":' c"n¿it~"ns. ~r. De::pster 5:1i--: t~H~Y r.1K;)~ not want
:: livc ",..i::. : ':~' ¿XJ:ct c"n::.;-;ra::ons. Th~>- arc! ~0t. ,,-orrio-!'j a;,C'ut
~lcsure .:-: : ~ .' ;rt}-al"ds. ~tc. CcJ.ncil;.;,an 5:to;'¿s said p."1r~ln;t
~!:..:a?in!- .:.. _ :::; of traffic ar~ ::-:e elenent$ ?-rO\1ideå \..":th thl~
a;:;:icatior...
.. : ,<.,lJ -,'as in ra":or cf on<! o';erall C.c Pemit and a
,__, ¡evel'ptIe:1t.
Ccr--<:c 11t13:1
::5.. Per::1it .
~ed by C,c:,:,~"~,, Stokes, s~co~e¿ ~y Counc1!~'n fitzRerald t? a?prove
a~licati~~ ~-'.--: o;ith the ¡~ sta~ard cond!tions as q~alified in the
~~t.:h 23. :: -: '5- 1 -: ~ I'cpor:; Condi tiQn 15 ns ane!':¿~ ~ ~o loc] ..~c the
~asc "cx.:::__ :;'~;¡?'2 a~d arc:-:.ltec.':urc of t:-I~ :-:.::'i.;.:'ings"; c!clction of
Cc::td._ion l~~ .:.,-.: ~~clus:'on of Con¿itionJ 17. 1S ;.tn'! 19.
nr.e City .\:::=::.v ,:ated that t:'1:õ ¿o,-,s not m,,!t t:,·· literal re<;u1re""ents
c.~ t:hl:: TO\a~ :!.:.;~= ..'lan. ..hic:.. sbo~..s tni;;¡ as cC'!:"J1'::"'clal. DisL:ljssion
:followcd. 1:,':: l7?ticant did not "'ëtn~ to rule C\ut conr.1ercia1 use in
:.t.s 'l'r·'fessi':"..C~ ;cnter; say, a place to fill prc<c"ipt1ons.
n.e 1110:10'. 1ocl> ".,,,n:ed by Counc1lr:an Irvin, ser""C:cd by ~!ayor :<oel
1:4 £..rli1c:· ::<.:,,:1 the approval vitr_ the pr"":';',,'n that this be for
7C:Jfessfù:-:'..: .'::"- :...:¿. a¿r.1in1strative and rclate,.! c~es.
A~endoent yote ~1eJ, 2-2
'1"'--
'",:"" ''.'
f
k.,
i-,
~':.i:;
, ~.
~,'I~~
·'·;r~,:<,~_.
><',.:-.
-
e
-
IlIIIITES OF THE AI"':;' ". 1972 CITY COUNCIL KEETIMC
kion aaeDded by CoÓDcilaan Stokes, seconded "" Counc1t.an
ft~z&era1d that .cc........ show on both Tentat1ve Hap and Us.
,..it. . '
.' - ....c carried, 4-0
~
Yote on the ort&1nal _cion on pa&e 8:
Ifotion carried, 4-0
MOved by Cou~cl1man Stokes. seconded by Cvur.cilnan Fitzgerald
to approve application 3-TM-72 with t:¡e 17 conèiti"ns.
Motion carried, 4-0
ARCHITECTrJl\L MID SITE APPROVAL CO:-lX1TTEE
18a. Submi..!on of Mi:\utes of meet::"g 0° ::arÒ 22, 1972.
1810. Ap¡'li:~:iCln HC-5l,0l5.14 of Paulin.. ~:oCldruff (Sun ':; Soi'.)
reques::'ng exception to the Sign Or~inancc; locate¿ in the
Cuper:inu Crossroads Center at Stl"'ens Cre!'k :lvd. and
Sarat",;a-Sunnyvale RClaC:. Rec.ocmcndd for approval.
The Planni~g Director stated the Council referr!'d this applicatlol
back to the H-Control Committee in Fl'òruary for the purpose of
holdi,,! a dul)' noticed public hcarbo. Su;secuenl ]v, the !:-Contr
Committee approved this applicat~on alter public hearing for the
non1ll~inated sign in order ~o keep a consistency of sign sizes
throughout this center.
MOved by Councilman Stokes, seconded by Councilman Irwin to
approve application HC-5I,OI5.14.
Motion carried, 4-0
19, Application UC-5l,126. 7 of the Ddgn C01IIpany requesting
approval of sign plan for Foothill Apartments locat.ed at
10210 roothill Expressvay. llecommended for approval.
The Planning Director briefly reviewed the proposal.
CC-lll
Page 9
".enc!llent
passed
.
3-U-'2
approved
3-T'4-72
approve.!
"I conti i t iO:1S
Sun '~! So!:
sign a~"in
1 2;,provcè. ~j.
II-Contro¡
HC-5l,015.14
approved
..:,;~-,,~',
e
e
_1~ at TIlE ¡.nIL 3. 1972 ern COtINC1L MEETDIC
,...... 1ty CnlDcU_a Stou.. HCODded by Cøuadll'Jaa Irvia to ."rewa
.~~t1ae 1IC-51.126.1.
IIodoD cauied, 4-0
,
øc-51.27J.2
ai'proved
Library
, furniture
M3yor to
report to
Board of
Supervisors
20. Appl1e.at~on BC-51.273.2 of Diu-Crane reqwtsUng approval of
lite, architecture aød landscaping for Northpo1nt Unit Two;
lcocated at BoIIelteed load ard Blue Jay Drive, llecOCllMDded for
appronI.
The applica:ioQ ~s briefly reviewed by t~e Planning Direc~or. phase
1\10 is essoO:t:lally the same as Phase Oce.
Hoved ~, :~c~cl~an S~okes, seconded OV :~a~cilman IrJln to approve
applicd:::: cC-Sl,273.2.
~otlo~ carried, 3-1
(Counc:L."an lr"'r. "cte! ag:l1nsl t:,13.)
PARKS.\ ;.: :_{;:,\TIO~ Co:~::SS 10:;
21. ,.. »:<:::1g.
·lATER :..... .~,:: ~ ~o:,
22. ~:. ,-=..;;~:.'':'\ of ~lnute!! of regular ~h.:~~ng ()f :'!f1rc:l 22, 1972.
LI I!IL\R': :: è.: SS [ON
23. ~..'=-=:SS.0n of :Unutes of rC;;lllar ~,-·è~i.n'!:) í~f H..1r..:h 21, j971..
Mayor \~~~: ::.",:eJ that th~ pe?plc arc ~:' '.tt' \:onct?rnl~(I .1~C"J.t the status
of thl' :'.·:~J.rv furniture. The Clt~· ~~.l:-.1:1~r stated t:\1:': he haä ·..'rltt\·~l
Mr. ~&r~~e= a letter on t~1s ßu~jcct.
Mðved ~y ::~¡\.:ilr.hln Stokes, scco:\de.: ~y l>uncilnan Ir'"in, 8~su!:"(n~ that
1f tl.e:'~ is ;10 answer fr:ö:a ~he Count:; ·.:';I.:('.l~iv~ by the t :I;1C of t.he 30.:1r.1
of SUt~:-;:~~!'';:' ~t¿etinB ncx':: vcck. thi' .~:SYJr is lO bt'jng ;,;p th'~ n.1.tter
of the ::~:~ry fur"iture before the So~rl.
Cour'..:i~-.1-. !r....·ii.1 noted that furniture ,':lert'¿ aftl'r ,)urs hac; alle;\d)·
been fí"':'::'V¿..!.
Mc:;t1on carrll?G, :.,.;}
I
.
.
e
t
IlUUTES or T"..E APRIL 3. 1912 CITY COUNCIL MEEtING
œPEKfIIIO CITIZENS' GOALS ___uU
24. Subliuion qf !l1:Iutea of Steering CœDittee of Karch 23.1972.
25. Sub!lhsion of Minutes of Steering Committee of Karch 20,1972.
PUII/1C I'-WJ:iGS
26. (.sJ Ao?ul of Charles II. Clifton and Stanley C. Jarvis
r<,"~st1ng reversal of the Planning Cooaiss1on denial
~i application I-Z-72 r~questing to rezone .39t acre
f=~ &1-10 (S1ngle-fanily Residential 10,000 Sq~are Foot
L-:~' Zone ~o R2-~.25 (Residential Duplex 4,250 Square
T~~: Fer Dwelliaa Unit) Zone. Sai¿ property is located
A: :C~37 and 10241 South 3lane, Aven~e.
The P.an,.,~. J,rector ran through the sli¿es ani visual
!~ilia:::i :oc Council v1~~ t~e preper:, :n Que~tion.
:he app: ::.::5 ::av!! n~t beeu s'"ccessfu: in their effort
:he ne:¡~:::. :~ join in vith then on to is plan.
ai¿s to
~e sah~
to get
~r. Xds::, : ,,.,.is. 10237 ~:¡aney Aven'Je, "d:,: he owns t!le Jarvis
property __:__; '.it;, ~tr. Jar-,,":..
Council::a:', ::::¡;era:¿ as:':ed ~!le Plannlo; :'irector 1£ t:,. "1anllin;
Depart".,,., " "~nvinced t:1is is a prcl'e< ,,,e for this I>rOI>',rtv.
.~e Plan~:c. J:rect~r ~ald it probablv is a~l>ropr1a~e vith single,
family r"',:~:CS on one side and an ap~rt~.nt cOAplex on the '
other. 'Ci ::a~nir~ r~par~nt did ~an: to talk about an overall
f'lan tor L< ¿rea. but tills did no~ re."h :ruition. Counc11"an
Fltzgeral' -Ai~ that ~en years ago these sa~e proper~y o.~ers
elect.>d ~:: :~ join the T",,. Cen~er, so it is reasonaole to
a5s~e t~cy ~ll not ~e c~~liag their :in¿, a~ this ti~e.
Counci:~,. ':~'es objec~eè to splitting t~e lot into four. He
feels tha: eo'en thou", the '-ases are not torn down, ~he property
Should be re:oned
Kr. 1la)~~~ Lozano said be 18 the owner 0: the adjacen~ property.
ae and his :.:ily objected to the rezon1n¡ because ia the future,
they p~aQ :~ build aev ~ on his pr~pert~.
CC-111
Page 11
Xeigh:'ors not
interested i,.
rart:ci?at::>;
in o\cral1 i':a~.
Pr<,?<,s 9~ i,
an arpropr1ate
~~c here.
Rez~ne even t:.?
use does not
change
Ne!.;hbor o:'ject
to rezonrn~
'>
, CIC-W
.... 12
I'Isbl1c
closed
:ue~ we'':":.· ':. I'='
..p i: use
:::ea:::5 th.<.
sa=:..
"?O~ zonl:.g
:'~ct:'O:1 to
.?~rcve I-Z-72
:ub 11e Hear~
~eol'ened
,.() chanc:e cf
eX?ansion
e
.
Itg¡rDa CW TIlE APIIL 3. 19n &m COURCIL MEETING
ÍIr. Ian1e 1Iac~. 1075 u..... Vista Drive, disagreed with eM tblD1t1DI
~t tIa1a ,,-,1d r.-1D r"l1-falli1y.
N:
'.. -hi lid not obj-':~ to re:ronlng the entire parcel. With Lab
IUc.ore AputMDt c:o.pla across the street now, it precludes INUdlDI
m. 011 tIa1a JI'OPHty.
~ed by COaøc1lman Irvin. seconded by ~unc:llmaD Fitzgerald to c:los.
the Public: liea1'1l11s.
AYES: C~~1lmen ritzlerald, Irwin, Stokes, }layor Noel
50ES : S~
AJlSÐIT : c..",""c l1_n rrol1ch
Motion c:arried, 4·,0
cnuncil~a" 5~okes agree¿ that the zoning is pr~pe:r in light of the fact
Lha~ it is ~,t prime: s1n~1e-:a=.ily preperty wi~h thø. aparL~pnts ac:ross
the stt'eet. !:O\:ever, t::is rezoning \:ill not solve t:,:c p!'obleM.
Counc:'>a:: Fitzgerald r.cte': t:-.at :!r. LouD.) ~'35 c,:;nee:ne<J about a raise
in his :t:,f$ i; this is r~z:o~ed. HI' sa¡'~ he d')èS n?t 'oelieve the taxes
will g, ;,::- .< l~ng as t~.ey c=nti~',le to li"e in Rl '10:7."5 on '11s p!"operty.
lip. ag~c~~ :--..:1.: a cluster ·.."'0';1-: b~ bt~tter ~1cre, hut the ð~?licant has
been ~~r~:~~ ~n this -~tter s:nce last s~~,~r.
llayor :;,..: ,lid this 15 s:;<>: zoni!!q. Co"ne~lma'l SL>Jkes did not agree,
if the I'=:,:..r:y around there ,,111 als" be rez,':\pd to R2. !Us c:oncern
vas tha~ i: this pro,osal is permitted to proeecd it ~il~ ?revent any
good de\'el::;o'"nt of the propertl in tilat area.
Moved ~y c:'"~~ U..an F1 tZ f ,raId. seeonde~ by Coune UOla:\ Stoke:; to uphold
the a"pea: :~ rezone th" propert)' to R2-~.25 an'!er a,plicat!on I-Z-72.
Counc:l:a~ 3:okps fel~ t~~re vas a ~rpat deal of justification both
vays. roe ",,\,e¿, and CouucllJlan r1tz¡;"ral:! seconded the :ooti"n ~o
reop":> th.. p"1>l1c Hcar1ng.
.
AYES: Councilmen ritzgerald, lr'dn, Stokes, !layor Koel
1:0£5: ~..)tw'
ABSß'T: Cou.lcllman Frol1ch
Motion carried, 4-0
!fro Dennis ,,,swered Counc:U:un Stokes taat there is absolutely no
pouslbili:y of putting zny sore property together for this development.
iit,
:~
:.Ii'
~,
f1':
;_:.~~.
¡'{1:'
..l;'
.
.
MINUTES OF TIiE APRIL 3, 1972 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
seconded by Counc1lÌ1iD litaguslel to
Moveel by, CounCUuD Stokes,
close the Public BeariDa~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEIIT :
·:1~~'.'~<;
1fa1or. 1foe1
CouncUaea r1talerald,
Bone
CÒUncilun Frcl1ch
Irvin, Stokes,
Hotion tarried, 4-0
Councilaan Irvin DOted, from s buffer standpoint, 12 aates sease
here, althoagh it 1s not a coordinated effort. It does the best
with what we have.
Vote on mo~ion on page 12:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSE~-r :
Coun~1~en Fitzgerald, Yrwin
Councllnan Sto;';es, :!ayor lI"e1
Councilcan Fr~l1ch
Motion tied, 2-2
Moved ;y Council~an Sto;';es, secon1ed òy Cou~ciloan Fitzgera¡~ to
cont~nue application l-Z-72 to the n~xt regular ~eetinb for t~e
purpose of gettin; a full Council vote.
Mot~on carr~cd, 4-0
Moved by Councilnan S:okes, seconded by Council~an Fitzgerald to
continue applicat~on 2-1r.~-72 ~o the next regular meeting.
Motjon carried, 4-0
Moved by Counc11can Stokes, seconded by Councilman Irwin to
reopen the Public Hearings on applications l-Z-72 and 2-~72.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen Fitzgerald, Irwin, Stokes, Mayor Noel
None
Councilman Frolich
Motion carried, 4-0
CC-Ill
Page 13
l-Z-72
con: in'..: ~::
2-1'}[-72
cont1r::.Jeè
1-2-72 A!:-:
2-'P1-72 i'u"~ic
Hear in,s
reopened
Xore de:ails
Ndf,~¡"'r
obj~:s
Ne1¡b.ocr
fa.=s the
proposal
~e1pbor
lib. plan
.
.
nUlw.~ OF THE Al'UL 3. 1972 CITY COUlCCIL KEETIlIG
27.
AppUcatsOD 2-1-72 of Hay Invest:lleDt CUlllpa, for the pTezoDiq of
3.3ft. .cr.. fr_ CouDt, A1-40 (lesidat ial-qdcultural S1Dgle-
f"µy~;,:~ø~qoo Scf1.Ire Foot Lots) ZoDe ".0 Ue-7.S (5iIl&11l-£_I1,
.el1c1eattal'C1...tû. '7,500 Square 'Ht Per Dvelliaa Unit) Zone.
Said þU¡pertt lit located em the IOUtbveat comer of "e LaDe and
HcCle11aa 1øaII.
,
The Pl&lll11D1 Director revlwed previOUll dlacu..1oftS about whether or DOt
a cluster abou1d be allowed em a property of thia sbe. The deøait, va
reduced to 4.6 aDd sub..quontly. it was decided that this vas a good use
for this property, for 15 individual boI:Ies with a bcmecnmers' aSSOCiatiOD
to mainta1ll the øteriors and c_on ar.... There is no puòlic roadway.
Tbe PlRnniug Director said a Tentative Hap will have to be filed. The
proposal is for 37' frontage to private sidewalk and ~wo travel lanes.
The Planning C~iss1on asked that as ll.e La.~e approaches ~lcClellðA.
tbat there òe full street 1mprovemen~s.
Hessrs. Mar~y Bess and Uarty \lall were pres'!:1t on òehalf of the
a,plicant. Mr. Hess aa1d all u~its ~avp. priv.~e areas in addition to
the common areas. They will sell In the ne':'g,,':;.orhooo! of të.e ",iddle
$40,000' s. All units will have tw-car gauges. T;¡cy have ~o'/ed the
units 1uite a ","ay '>acK fron ~\cClellan and "a\"e re:ocateJ ~he ene unit
in question ~o ~he bes~ possi~le sp~~.
C,>uncit.".n Stokes asked if t~'ey are in agr,,'~-:en~ with all 31 conditions.
~(r. ;·!arty Hall, 1627 è!olle:1àec<. Road, 5,":1"1'".:e, o;aid t ;"y .'ave had
7 ca~ls alrea":" fI'o::> ,eo;>le ";:0 '"ish t') ;JUTo.-.aze th,,~·, units, j':;t since
the Planning Co=isslon action en it. T:1Cj· aTe in agree:".ent ".:ith the
conditions.
}~yor Noel as~ej for cocnents fron the aUdie~ce.
Mr. Bernie 3uchna:'l, Linda Vista Drive, ~,.ld he O"'t1~ a ho""" ar)'~nd ~he
cornel" from this. He objcctei to th~ ori;l~al prcpo$31 a~¿ ioe~ not see
any su'Jstantlal chA.,,;es to il. His o:'jc,;t.':'O~3: o,;l':n: c.orn~r. the dens!:':,.
~u:lnell1.1g of traf!ic out onto alr<>ady bu",y :~cClcllan, and t:." :Hea n... 011:
single-family re~ide=ce8.
~(rs. Patricia Phillips, 1167 L1n¿a Vista, sd;! she i~ "Jer)' "1UC" in favor
of this propusal. Ehe ll"el· in this area..'~ ".I~nts to st"y in the ar"a.
She felt this vas a "eau'Hul s;>ot for ti:is ¿ev~lop::ent.
Mr. Glas, 108~ Linda Vi ;ta, ·..as very ",,"ch j,,,- fallor of t:'i:;. !Ie is a ..en"":-
of the sw10 club ano! Ul.ùerstandò "'er,bers~,i¡> "ill be a p::rt ?~ t;',:o packa!';e
I.ere. They will be within ""Ikin" di$taD~e 0: t:'e club. The intersection
at McClellan "ill be inproved.
.
.
MINUTES OF TIlE APRIL 3, 1972 em COUNCIL MEETING
Hr. BarTY Bobb1tt.l186 ,-....... Vista Drive, said he __ ..ery _cb
in favor of this. project.
Hr. Buclmall nbÚtted that the last two persons who spoke in favo
of this project have their ballles up for sale.
Mr. Hess said these are single-family homes which will be sold.
Tbe condi~1ons adequately take care of the intersection.
Koved by Councilman St~kes, seconded by Councilman Fitzgerald to
close t~e Public Hearing.
AYES:
NOES:
A!!SE.\ï:
Councilmen ritzgerald, Irwin, Stokes, ~ ayor Noel
:ione
C~u"cilman Frolic~
Motion carried, 4-0
Moved ~y Councilaan 1r~in, seconded by Council~an Stokes :~
appro\"~ ap?¡:cation 2-Z-7~ ilit~ the 31 cc-nù.iti:!'s rec..._e::-:e:1
by the r:annins C~issij~.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSE:_¡ :
C~':ncll::¡en Fitzgerald, Irwin, Stokes, :'!ayor :;oel
Xcne
C~unc11man Frolic~
Ko~ion carried, 4-0
First Reading of Ordinance So. 532:
"An Or¿inance of the City of Cupertino ~"endlng Section 1 of
Ordinance So. 2 by Prezo~ing a Certain Portion of the County fr~
COunt:r Al-~O (Single-f~ily Residential-Agricultural, 40,000 S~.
Ft. Lots) Zone to City of Cu,ertino llIC-7.5 (Single-faoily lles1-
dential Clus~er 7.500 Sq. Ft. Per Dwelling Uni~) Zone; A??roxi-
..tel)" 3.36 Acrec Located on the Southl.est Corner of Rae Lane and
lkClellan Road." - read by Mayor Noel.
Koved by Councilman Stokes. seconded by Councilman Irvin ~o have
Ordinance No. 532 read by t1tle only and the Kayor's reading to
constitute the First leading.
AYES:
HOES:
AaSEN!:
Council.en Fitzgerald, Irwin, Stokes, Mayor !roel
None
Councilman rro11~
Kotian carried, 4-0
CC-lll
Page 15
,
~
.1
1
Neighbor in
favor of proj
,
,
Public Hearin§
closed
2-Z-72 a:"r="I"~
~~!c~;1dit: =~s
"j
Ord. 532
irst llead1:1&
1
f
Res. ;.~..:. J
aèo;:~,'¿
Res. 3241
adopce4
..'----~'......... -
.
.
'1ùJIurES or THE APRIL 3. 1972 CITY COUNCIL HEETDIG
iOlDxw-
!'
""~" '.
First Réadina of jJ¡¡",.'" =0:. No. 531: "An arðf- - of tbe City of
Cupertino 1legul.~.;..ì¡¡¡' Use of and Conduct 1D die Public Parks of
the City of O1percf;i1ø.;;.,":" (continued frOlll meetiDs of !larch 20. 1972)
Upon rec_endation of ê1ae City Hanager, it vas JIIOYe4 by Councilman
Fitzgerald, seconded by Coo-ilman Stokes to cOI1:i_e ~ First Reading
of Ordinance No. 531. '
,::-
,'28.
},
Hotiaa carded, 4-0
RESOLUT10SS
29. !i~. 3240: "A RI;so1c:!.oa of the City Council 0: ~he City of
Cu~ertipo Allov~~g eer:ain Cla~s and Denan¿5 ?a:a=:e in the
~~unts an~ fra= the ï~nds as Hereinaftel" ne5C~~~e~ for Salaries
a~¿ .agcs for the rayro:l Period Ending }fa.rc:.. 2:. :972." -
read by Counc1l=an S:okes in the aõscnce of Tr~=~~e~ Fr~lich.
~~vcd :y Council~n lrJi=, seconded by Counc~lman Fi~=;era:¿ to adopt
Resolut:'"n ::0. 324C.
AYES:
:iOES:
A:;SE~:r :
Ccuncilnen Fi:z;~:'al¿, Irwin, 5t.okes. ~'ta::c= :':<jel
:;o~e
Co~ncil~n Frol~c~
Mcti~ carried, 4-0
30. :>0. 32U: "... Resol;tion of the City Council 0: ::." City of
C:z;o!rtino Allo",~ng Certain Clai..,~ :mJ DE!I!Ian"; ?7a::", in the
o\::o~n:s and frClS the Funds as Hereinafter D"sorco~ for General
,¡;,¿ lliscellanE.ous !x;>e:>d1tures." , read by CC';~~~:::.ao, 5'''''es.
MoveJ òy Councilmafi 1rJ1:, seconded by Counctlna~ F::z¡ë=ald to
adopt Resolution ~o. 3241.
AYES:
Nob:
AB5EXr:
Councilcen F1:%cerald, Irwin, S:okes, Xay:r ~el
Sone
C,-,unc limen Frolich
Mocic3 carried, 4-0
.
.
..-n.S OF THE .\PR1L 3, 1972 CIT! COUNCIL MEETING
B..
'" ;.
'.i1'i
.. 3244: "A Resolut1oD of die City Council of the City of
Cupertino APpointin8'~i:'Að"'''' as City Attorney. Lawr.en~
'I. Terry as Assistant C1tJ Attorney. and Charles T. Kilian as
Deputy City Attorney. øescdb1Dg Their Duties,an4 Providing
for Their Compensation.- ~ ~eâd by Mayor Noel.
, ·:~i
^,
,
, a. .A by Counc1lz:1an Irwin. .t-cõøded by Councilaan Fitzgerald to
.... an executive session at: tile eDd of this agenda to discuss
&e.Jlution No. 3244.
Motion carried, 4-0
UI71SISHED BUSIXESS
,
32. Recommendation for appraisals and preliminary reports -
Crossroads Assessment District.
ne Assistant Director of P"bl~:: IJor:ts stated the ne"t step in
~i£ matter is to select an arpra1~er.
Cc:.mci l!1an Ir..::n \.'3.5 conce!"ne~ a~ut cost :f t C7:'lS to the :1"y. Ee
voul¿ like to s~;gest the Ç1:y Finance Director st~dy the Matter
~ fi~d a ~ay to include aces: icpact stat~cnt. Counc1:~n
S~ke5 noted that all cost~ for t~1s asses~ent district, up until
a certain point, are to be b"rne by the people as:<ing for thlL
C".Ioo=c1L."..n Fitzgerald as:~e¿ if it is too late at this point to go
=-=k and ask t~at the property ~.-ners be required to bear this
cost in the sli~ht chance ~hat the LID fails. fhe Assistant
~ector of Public ~orks said ~t ~ost of the agreements have
been signed, so it ~~uld be rather d1ff1cul~. Councilman F1~zgera d
felt that this cla~se was inadvertently left out of the Agre~ent.
Bowed by Counci13an Stokes, seco~ed by Counc11~an Irwin to pos~-
poDe ac~ion on ~~e Crossroads Asses~~nt - ctrict to allow tice
far the staff to check with the properLY ~wners and with Attorney
~s, who is in charge of se~t1:g up this Lit.
Motion carried, 4-0
33. Staff report on San Felipe Water Project.
~_ Lester, Vallco Park representative asked the Council for
~tmous suppor~ on this San Felipe Water Project.
CC-ll1
Page 17
.
",
Res. 32" to
exec, session
Cost 1::pact
statc~ent
requeste¿
Crossro;,':!s
Asses~nent Dis:
postponed
cc-w
l'aS. 18
.",'.
,,':
3asketba:.l
c~::rt rE:f~ed
t., ? &R Co:-ra..
";ra:"1a::l l~r
r~fe=re~ :..:J
3ta': f for
report
,0PlCS a_.
ct.1c'pted
.
e
','
OF THE APRIL 3. 1972 CITY COUICIL HEITØõ
E
,> ~'" ;
"':', '.. .. .,,>:;L,.^,. '." ..' .":.' . <'. i; -", ..
~,ed by CoaneiliuDSèa"': ¡ ÑêÖDðed by CouncllÌ1111 P1Uiuald to adopt
"1" ~1Io 3247, ',' "',' ",
ut.&.OD.. .~:':··:;"'.-;;-:.~}.'f',",':;i?-,'- ',":," ;:
. .'-. ,..¡¡...."
'~·~rded, 4;.0
,,¡,
.@., '
': ifayor Noel
.r;,'
" court.
iDtroducêditJ.e leuer he bad received' aIIout the buketba11
1Ir. Ed Rutledge, 10640 Stokes Avenue, Cup"!'tlno, said he and two
of his neighbors are coacerned about the eruction of a basketball
court on the property beh1Dd him. He feels those people living
adjacent to the location of the basketball court should have been asked
perm1ss10n.
Moved by Councilman Sto£es. seconded by COunci~n Fitz~erald ,to ask
t~e Parks and Recreat~on Coon1ssion to consider rel~cat1on or deletion
of the basketball court in ~he So~erset Square area.
~?tion carried, 4-0
The l~tter froc ~r. Gra~ regard~nb the l6-~/2 acres a~jac~n~ to Oak
~eadov. ~JS introduced.
~oved ~y ~~ncil~an S~O~~t seconded by Coancl1ða~ Fltzseral~ to cef~r
Xr. Crah,,,,'s letter to the staff for It report and fo t.1e City Attorney
for his c~ents on ~O~ :~1s affects the project.
:~tion carried, 4-0
SEll I:USI:;;:SS
34. StJÎÎ report on ap?Crtio~ent of California's Fe¿eral TOPICS Funds
a~J a request for a resolu~ion of intent to o=li~ate the
8rPortiorcent.
Hoved by Councilman Stokes. seconded by Councll~an Irvin to adQpt
the Resolution of lnte"t~on Concërnin.:; Accu,""la::ion .11'11 Expe:1ditClre of
TOPICS F,,~ds by the City of Cupertino.
AYES:
SOES:
. SENT:
COuncil:;)"n F1~zgerald. Irwin, Stokes, :.ay.,r Soel
Sonc
Councib<ln Fro11.:h
~tlOn carried, 4-0
.
.
,
~:'
It
~.'"
.
.
IlIKUTES OF r~E APRIL 3, 1972 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
36. Request fro-. W_"s AII:d11ary of Tri-CH~es Little League
for a penoit to operaté a flea mark¡¡t at the shoppiDg center
OD Steveos Creek B1,,4. aad Portal Avenue on June 24. 1972~
;¡/
~ "":',,~'
,{'
''Ibis matter vas apProvCÎIIIIDIIer Written CoIIaunications.
37. Request frOGl JoImB. YOUII8ns. !fenber, Board of Directors.
Tti-Cities Little League for the City Council to proclaim the
period of April 29 throu¡b Hay 6 as "Little League Week".
This utter "..s approved UDder Written Coc:municat1ons.
CONS~IT CAu:xDAll
38. Resolu:i~n No. 3243: "A Resolution of the City Council of
:h" Ci:~o of Cupertbo Approving Una: :-lap of Tract :;0. 5128,
Gl~~ C~~s, Located on Eoaestead Roa1 _~sterly of Barranca
D=:ve; ;~iser Aetna, A P2rtnership (:-Ia~kay ~o~es D1v~s1on)
DCV":O?i=: Accepting Cer:ain Publ~c S~rvice f.asc=ent;
A~t~:~::ing the City Engineer anJ the City Clerk t~ 5ign the
F:~a: ~~~; and Authorizing the Agre~ent in Connection
Th;:rc....i:~. It
39. R<'so:'":ion ~o. 3245: "A Resolution =: the City Coun:~l of
t~~ Ci:~ of Cuper~in: Accept~n~ Grant or ~as~ent for Pe~e:op
",,,,,t Riohts frOlll ::a1ser Aetna, " Pan::ersnip (Mac~a:" 2=es
Dhoisi:,,); Located 0:: the Southed)" Si~e of Ho-:est ea¿ Road
500 Fie: _esterly of the Intersection of f~oestead R~ad and
3arr3:1:'¡ Drive. It
40. Reso:~:ion ~o. 3246: "A Resolution 0: :he City Council of
th~ City of Cuper~~DO Acceptin$ Grant of Easement for Develop
ment Rights frOlll Deane' Deane, a Delaware Corporation;
Lo~ate~ Southerly of and Adjacent to Stevens Cree~ !:vd.,
Appr.oxi::ately 1600 Feet ;;est of Foothill Blvd."
41. A~~ep:&nce of aunicipal iIoproveoents:
Cali Shopping Cen~er, ~orthwes~ Corner of McClellan
~d and Sara~oa.-Sunnyvale Road.
Hoved by Cc""cUman Stokes, seconded by Councilnan Irwin to adopt
the Conse:\t Calendar.
Ho~ion carried, 4-0
CC-lll
Page 19
Consent
Calendar
adopted
,,-111
Pa.e 20
,
,~,
..
..
OF r:ΠAPlltL 3, 1972 Cln COUNCIL UEEIltiG
OF OfFICEBS
City u_ I" cOlllllel1teð tha£ __ of the woTit on the CUPE&TDlO SCIRE
done 011 the outside. "cost-keakdown vas included in his ,,-ritten
~rt.
~::
$ph.e of
'.&fluenc-
Sunnyvale·.
:~l1cy r_
boring UDf.-
1.-::..roved sr:reer
for ~'ater i..iae
:?,:,ltce Ro!>M!%'Y"
r~co&n1,;:!.o12
erPT. SŒ~
e.~?end 1 ';·_r ~
c':'arif iea: :~,::::
City Staff
~ checldlll with ~he Palo &1co .,.........g Deparœent. the City Manager
learned that the Sphere of Iøf1--..e line is also ~he city l1a1ts line
før the City of Palo Alto dlrøçgb the Ka1ser-Per.:l8nente property.
Ia checking vi:h the sunnyvale City Manager, it vas learned that it is
S:SDDyvale's j Ol1cy to bore UDder all existing i::!?r.1ved streets for
vater main o::ens1on. The only exception ~o this policy wculd be
where condit:ous occur which would make it vir:ually impossible to
install the ~i~e by t~e bor!:g ~rocedure.
P~:1ce Re;.~' =~c~~nition cereøony vill take place in the City Hall
C="ndl C~=~'7 It 7 :30 p~ on ^;>rll 12th.
¡-~e City y~~~~= cc~ent~ O~ the letter writ~e~ tc AS3~bl~an H3y~eR
1::1 regaró :: Å;seaëly Bills.
Co~nciJ-a- :~._~ ~~<~d t~p C~ty ~~a1.er t~ ~onta:~ t~p. F.~~tnr ~f the
C:;?~r:i.:-:- :_. _::.~r to r:i.ear 'J,? ';.~e natter t~\at ';t? ..!~.:: not sp..nri $4000
coo: CUp·~R;::~: :''::~;E.
C.:'.:nci:c.~:. ~:-::..~ ·.·antc1 to k:'l~· 1: Sun:\Y"al~'s ;,~:io::' re:crre'! only
~: ""atC'r ::.l_ -:~. :-i'cause he has seen count ~I;:'S:; ? ·_.1:~S in Sann}··/a le
v~re ..~...¿~::-::.: ";fr.'~(S are !.re~c~"\.ed. It ....:1.3 n:o:.c':' t~~<l( t':"enc~.in~ ":lust
t~'e pl.a.:'; ~..~~-:,:-_("s for re?a1r.
':":.e Dire.::,: ... \..;.~inistra:ive ~ervices anno·.:~.:e.! there 'Wo1l1¿ ~e a
Pzrsonnc; _~1r~ ~tujy sess:o~ ~D äednesday, A~~~l 5lh, a~ 7:30 P~.
44. Rcc~f.:..::::_:on:y ~aYf)r of nen-agenda ite:1S.
There ",,,r,, :>:"".
.
-t
.
IWIU'IES OF I;':' APRIL 3, 1972 CIty COUNCIL MEtrING
.
..7:",,'
't~;,,,,,ed by eo=iblan Stok... seCoDded by Councilaan Irwin to adjour
i'f ' , :,~ aD execut:'n session at 10:20 PK.
,.-,
Motion c:ar;rfed. 4-0
,; ';....i;
,¡, ..",,:~'ttk,
}:r?! .-,~·;t/f'
,,;!~:Ybe lIeet1~ =~onvened at 10:32 1'K.
lIMred by Ct-;::.:¡l:an Irwin. seconded by Councilman Stokes to adopt
IJtsolutioc ~_ 3244.
AYES:
mES:
ABSENT:
~'~~:~en Fitzgerald. Irwin, Stokes, Mayor Noel
~...-~
C,_:"c:=a~ Frolic~
Motion ca~r1~, 4-0
ADJO¡;RS~S::
~~e¿ Þy (:~-~_~~~~ Irw~n. 5e:~n:e~ by Co~~ci:=~~ Stokes to a¿-
_~,urn thi' ,.,,::- _' at 10:3:) P"!..
Motion carried, 4-0
Respectfully sub~itted,
~ <:.. ~~~\.'-<'-"-G~
Recording S~~~etary
CC-lll
Page 21
Adjourned to
exec. session
.
Res. 3244
ado?ted