The URL can be used to link to this page

09-17-19 Searchable packetCITY OF CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 10300 Torre Avenue and 10350 Torre Avenue Tuesday, September 17, 2019 5:30 PM Non-Televised Special Meeting Closed Session (5:30) and Televised Regular Meeting (6:45) NOTICE AND CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Cupertino City Council is hereby called for Tuesday, September 17, 2019, commencing at 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Conference Room A, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014. Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business on the subject matters listed below under the heading, “Special Meeting." The regular meeting items will be heard at 6:45 p.m. in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. SPECIAL MEETING ROLL CALL - 5:30 PM CLOSED SESSION 1.Subject: Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Gov't Code Section 54957). Title: City Attorney. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 PM ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject: Present award to Cupertino resident Vishnu Athrey from Saint Andrews Episcopal School for winning the Qalaxia Build_your_ BOT contest (continued from September 3) Recommended Action: Present award to Cupertino resident Vishnu Athrey from Saint Andrews Episcopal School for winning the Qalaxia Build_your_ BOT contest. Page 1 09/17/19 1 of 132 City Council Agenda September 17, 2019 POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on any matter not on the agenda. The total time for Oral Communications will ordinarily be limited to one hour. Individual speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. As necessary, the Chair may further limit the time allowed to individual speakers, or reschedule remaining comments to the end of the meeting on a first come first heard basis, with priority given to students. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Council from discussing or making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF (10 minutes) 2.Subject: Report on Committee assignments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 3.Subject: Approve the September 3 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the September 3 City Council minutes A - Draft Minutes 4.Subject: Application for Alcohol Beverage License for I&P Runway, LLC (dba Ippudo Ramen), 19540 Vallco Parkway, Suite #130 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the application for Alcohol Beverage License for I&P Runway, LLC (dba Ippudo Ramen), 19540 Vallco Parkway, Suite #130 Staff Report A-Application 5.Subject: Application for Alcohol Beverage License for Stak Partners, LLC (dba El Greco Grill), 20080 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #104 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the application for Alcohol Beverage License for Stak Partners, LLC (dba El Greco Grill), 20080 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #104 Staff Report A-Application 6.Subject: Application for Alcohol Beverage License for Little Dipper Cupertino, LLC (dba Little Dipper Shabu Shabu), 20588 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 2 09/17/19 2 of 132 City Council Agenda September 17, 2019 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the application for Alcohol Beverage License for Little Dipper Cupertino, LLC (dba Little Dipper Shabu Shabu), 20588 Stevens Creek Boulevard Staff Report A-Application 7.Subject: Application for Alcohol Beverage License for Ramen United, Inc. (dba Afuri Ramen & Dumpling), 20803 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #110 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the application for Alcohol Beverage License for Ramen United, Inc. (dba Afuri Ramen & Dumpling), 20803 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #110 Staff Report A-Application 8.Subject: Approve option to use design-build procurement for qualifying projects and establish a corresponding conflict-of-interest limitation pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-114 approving the use of design-build project delivery pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq., and establish a corresponding conflict-of-interest limitation pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22162. Staff Report A - Draft Resolution SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES PUBLIC HEARINGS ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 9.Subject: Receive information report and presentation on Regnart Creek Trail 65% design and revised estimated costs; consideration of various trail improvement options (some of which also include on-street bicycle improvements) and alternative trail alignments to the proposed trail (on-street Alternatives 4 and 5); and, if design of the proposed trail continues, consider an increase to the design and environmental budget. Page 3 09/17/19 3 of 132 City Council Agenda September 17, 2019 Recommended Action: Receive information report and presentation on Regnart Creek Trail 65% design and revised estimated costs; trail improvement options, and Alternatives 4 and 5 to the proposed trail; and if Council continues to move forward with design of the proposed trail: 1. Provide direction to staff regarding completion of design with a preferred trail improvement option A, B, C, D, E, or F; and 2. Adopt draft Resolution 19-115 amending the FY 2019/20 Capital Improvement Program budget to increase the budget to perform design and environmental clearance services from $538,000 to $813,000. Staff Report A - Valley Water Letter B - Community Outreach and Engagement C - 65% Plans D - Drawing of Intersection Crossing E - Alternative 4 and 5 Alignments F - Popular Trail Widths G - Alternative Scenario Cost Comparison H - Draft Resolution I - Items that Remain in Progress with Valley Water ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - CONTINUED (As necessary) COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Prior to seeking judicial review of any adjudicatory (quasi-judicial) decision, interested persons must file a petition for reconsideration within ten calendar days of the date the City Clerk mails notice of the City’s decision. Reconsideration petitions must comply with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code §2.08.096. Contact the City Clerk’s office for more information or go to http://www.cupertino.org/index.aspx?page=125 for a reconsideration petition form. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next City Council meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the Council meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, City Council meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Page 4 09/17/19 4 of 132 City Council Agenda September 17, 2019 Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Council, and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to the podium and the Mayor will recognize you. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. Page 5 09/17/19 5 of 132 DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 3, 2019 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING At 5:30 p.m. Mayor Steven Scharf called the Special City Council meeting to order in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chambers, 10350 Torre Avenue. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Steven Scharf, Vice Mayor Liang Chao (5:34 p.m.), and Councilmembers Darcy Paul, Rod Sinks, and Jon Robert Willey. Absent: None. STUDY SESSION 1. Subject: Study Session regarding Below Market Rate (BMR) Residential Housing Mitigation and Commercial Linkage Fees for the Cupertino BMR Housing Program. Application No(s).: CP-2019-01; Applicant(s): City of Cupertino; Location: Citywide Recommended Action: Receive update and provide any input to Staff Written communications for this item included two presentations. Director of Community Development Ben Fu introduced the item. Eric Phillips from Goldfarb & Lipman and Sujata Srivastava from Strategic Economics reviewed the presentation. Mayor Scharf opened public comment and the following individuals spoke: Jean Bedord (Cupertino Resident) – concern over increase in linkage fees. Jennifer Griffin – Need BMR rental; don't reduce parking requirements; need vital City resources Mayor Scharf closed public comment. 09/17/19 6 of 132 Council comments included: possibly lower retail fees and increase hotel fees; get away from linkage fee and develop BMR housing for each type of individual project; provide example of a development that includes a commercial bonus in connection with BMR housing; there is a delta (4.2% and 4.6%) between in lieu fees for lower and higher density rentals so calculate how linkage fees would change to get to baseline of 4.2% including looking at historical ranges to justify any change; include Extremely Low Income (ELI) category in City’s BMR program; have staff look at change in rental unit mix and made up of ELI and Moderate keeping total percentage at 15%; would also consider going to 10% to include ELI; have a second round of peer review; incent diversity of companies including small and medium sized; hesitant to increase demands on developers who build housing in the City; increase on-site production for ownership housing but don’t increase fees; consider higher percentage of BMR for ownership housing with mixed -use development under certain conditions; have staff work out numbers as don’t want to discourage for sale housing; incent more moderate and medium income housing for government employees, teachers, etc.; levy fee on office and not housing; also look into fees for hotel. Direction to staff included: more information regarding incentive programs to encourage more affordable housing in commercial developments; in-lieu fees as compared with the cost of on-site compliance; changes in feasibility thresholds over time; possible reductions in fees for retail uses; and options for providing more extremely low income housing, housing for the developmentally disabled, and moderate income housing; and also requested additional peer review of the office and hotel feasibility studies. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 7:08 p.m. Mayor Steven Scharf called the Regular City Council meeting to order in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chambers, 10350 Torre Avenue and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Steven Scharf, Vice Mayor Liang Chao, and Councilmembers Darcy Paul, Rod 09/17/19 7 of 132 Sinks, and Jon Robert Willey. Absent: None. CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Subject: Present award to Vishnu Athrey from Saint Andrews Episcopal School for winning the Qalaxia Build_your_ BOT contest. Recommended Action: Present award to Vishnu Athrey from Saint Andrews Episcopal School for winning the Qalaxia Build_your_ BOT contest. This item was not heard as the recipient was not in attendance. 2. Subject: Proclamation for September as National Preparedness Month Recommended Action: Present Proclamation for September as National Preparedness Month Mayor Scharf presented a proclamation to Citizen Corps Coordinator Ken Erickson and the CERT group for September as National Preparedness Month. Mayor Scharf reported out from the Special Meeting Closed Session held on September 3, 2019: Subject: Conference with Legal Counsel pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1); Re: Pending Litigation; Friends of Better Cupertino, et al. v. City of Cupertino; Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 18CV330190 (SB 35 Vallco Project). He reported that the Council discussed with legal counsel this pending litigation for which discussion in open session would prejudice the City in the litigation. No reportable action was taken. POSTPONEMENTS – None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Jennifer Griffin talked about R1 housing in Seattle and Oregon. Julia Miyakawa (Cupertino resident) talked about protecting creeks, riparian habitats, wildlife, etc. when trails are built, and to pursue an alternative to Regnart Creek Trail outside of the creek corridor. Linda Wyckoff (Cupertino resident) talked about Regnart Creek Trail and outreach. 09/17/19 8 of 132 Gary Wong (Cupertino resident) speaking on behalf of Campo De Lozano HOA talked about requesting a boundary survey for Regnart Creek Trail. Suraj Dalvi (Cupertino resident) talked about Regnart Creek Trail and 65% design. Ilango Ganga (Cupertino resident) talked about Regnart Creek Trail and concern over privacy and noise; should be reviewed by the Planning Commission; publish information early. Benaifer Dastoor (Cupertino resident) talked about Regnart Creek Trail and asked to see a feasibility report for alternatives 4 and 5. Beth Knodel (Cupertino resident) talked about no support for Regnart Creek Trail due to dirt path and erosion, and accessibility concerns with crossing at Rodrigues, Estates, and Blaney. REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF (10 minutes) 3. Subject: Report on Committee assignments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments Councilmembers highlighted the activities of their various committees. CONSENT CALENDAR Paul moved and Scharf seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as presented except for item number 9 which was pulled for discussion. Ayes: Scharf, Chao, Paul, Sinks, and Willey. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: None. 4. Subject: Approve the August 6 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the August 6 City Council minutes 5. Subject: Approve the August 20 City Council minutes Recommended Action: Approve the August 20 City Council minutes 6. Subject: Resolution adopting the City of Cupertino's State-mandated Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Plan Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-112 adopting the City of Cupertino's Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Plan which demonstrates the City's long -term commitment to implementation of green stormwater infrastructure as required by the City's Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit for the San Francisco Bay Region 09/17/19 9 of 132 7. Subject: Award of contract to G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. for $270,000 for 2019 Speed Table Installation Project No. 2019-112 Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to award a contract to G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. in the amount of $246,100 and approve a construction contingency of $24,000 for a total of $270,000 for 2019 Speed Table Installation Project No. 2019-112 8. Subject: 2018-2019 Civil Grand Jury of Santa Clara County Report Entitled, "Inquiry into Governance of the Valley Transportation Authority" Recommended Action: Approval of response to the 2019-2019 Civil Grand Jury of Santa Clara County Report Entitled, "Inquiry into Governance of the Valley Transportation Authority" 9. Subject: Amendment to existing voluntary collection agreement with Airbnb regarding transient occupancy taxes to allow certain short -term rental hosts to remit taxes directly to the City Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to enter into Amendment No. 1 to the voluntary collection agreement with Airbnb and to enter into other minor amendments to the voluntary collection agreement in the future Mayor Scharf opened public comment and the following individual spoke: Jennifer Griffin Mayor Scharf closed public comment. Assistant to the City Manger Katy Nomura answered questions from the speaker and Council. Sinks moved and Scharf seconded to authorize the City Manager to enter into Amendment No. 1 to the voluntary collection agreement with Airbnb and to enter into other minor amendments to the voluntary collection agreement in the future. The motion carried unanimously. 10. Subject: Library Commission Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 Work Program Recommended Action: Approve the Library Commission FY 2019-20 Work Program SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 11. Subject: Second reading of Ordinance Nos. 19 -2187 and 19-2188 adopting Zoning Text and Map Amendments related to the Vallco Shopping District Special Area. (Application No(s).: 09/17/19 10 of 132 MCA-2019-02, Z-2019-01 (EA-2013-03); Applicant(s): City of Cupertino; Location: 10101 to 101333 North Wolfe Road APN#s:316-20-080, 316-20-081, 316-20-103, 316-20-107, 316-20- 101, 316-20-105, 316-20-106, 316-20-104, 316-20-088, 316-20-092, 316-20-094, 316-20-099, 316- 20-100, 316-20-095) Recommended Action: Conduct the second reading and enact: 1. Ordinance No. 19-2187 (MCA-2019-01): "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino eliminating references in the Municipal Code to the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan and adding language establishing development standards for a new Mixed Use Planned Development with Multifamily (R3) Residential and General Commercial zoning designation (P(R3,CG))" and 2. Ordinance No. 19-2188 (Z-2019-01): "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending the zoning map to rezone 13.1 acres within the Vallco Shopping District Special Area to Mixed Use Planned Development with Multifamily (R3) Residential zoning P(R3,CG) and General Commercial uses and the remainder of the Special Area to General Commercial (CG)" City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of Ordinance No. 19-2187: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino eliminating references in the Municipal Code to the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan and adding language establishing development standards for a new Mixed Use Planned Development with Multifamily (R3) Residential and General Commercial zoning designation (P(R3,CG))." Written communications for this item included a letter to Council. Vice Mayor Chao recused herself from this item out of an abundance of caution and left the dais. Director of Community Development Ben Fu corrected an address in the subject to read, “10133 North Wolfe Road.” Mayor Scharf opened public comment and the following individuals spoke: Jennifer Griffin – concern with loss of shopping and retail in Cupertino; don’t overload Cupertino High School. Tim Cornwell (San Rafael resident) on behalf of The Concord Group and retained by the property owner – economic, BMR, and other concerns. Jonathan Bass on behalf of the property owner – asked Council to reconsider General Plan Amendment and zoning ordinances adopted at the last meeting; legal concerns. 09/17/19 11 of 132 Katherine Van Dusen ceded her time to Jonathan Bass. Jean Bedord (Cupertino resident) – concerns over zoning and asked Council to reconsider actions as makes no economic sense. Lisa Warren – support for moving forward with rezoning. Liana Crabtree (Cupertino resident) – support for moving forward with rezoning. Mayor Scharf closed public comment. City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of Ordinance No. 19-2187: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino eliminating references in the Municipal Code to the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan and adding language establishing development standards for a new Mixed Use Planned Development with Multifamily (R3) Residential and General Commercial zoning designation (P(R3,CG)).” Paul moved and Scharf seconded to read Ordinance No. 19-2187 by title only and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes: Scharf, Paul, and Willey. Noes: Sinks. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Recuse: Chao. Paul moved and Scharf seconded to enact Ordinance No. 19-2187: Ayes: Scharf, Paul, and Willey. Noes: Sinks. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Recuse: Chao. City Clerk Grace Schmidt read the title of Ordinance No. 19-2188: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending the zoning map to rezone 13.1 acres within the Vallco Shopping District Special Area to Mixed Use Planned Development with Multifamily (R3) Residential zoning P(R3,CG) and General Commercial uses and the remainder of the Special Area to General Commercial (CG)." Paul moved and Scharf seconded to read Ordinance No. 19-2188 by title only and that the City Clerk’s reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Ayes: Scharf, Paul, and Willey. Noes: Sinks. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Recuse: Chao. Paul moved and Scharf seconded to enact Ordinance No. 19-2188: Ayes: Scharf, Paul, and Willey. Noes: Sinks. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Recuse: Chao. Vice Mayor Chao returned to the dais. ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 09/17/19 12 of 132 12. Subject: Application and Review Procedures for Projects Proposed Pursuant to Senate Bill 35 (Application No(s): CP-2019-04; Applicant(s): City of Cupertino; Location: Citywide) Recommended Action: That the City Council find adoption of the proposed Resolution exempt from CEQA, adopt Resolution No. 19-113 for Application and Review Procedures for Projects proposed pursuant to Senate Bill 35, and review and provide any input on the Draft Senate Bill 35 Application Package. Written communications for this item included a presentation and exhibit. Director of Community Development Ben Fu introduced Caitlin Brown from Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger who reviewed the presentation. Mayor Scharf opened public comment and the following individuals spoke: Lisa Warren – shorten age of title report accepted with application to one month. Jennifer Griffin – concern with SB35 and other housing bills coming out of the State. Kitty Moore – spoke on item #21 from chart in packet; add language to certification of compliance of eligibility requirements and/or hazardous waste and substances statement. Mayor Scharf closed public comment. Paul moved and Sinks seconded to find adoption of the proposed Resolution exempt from CEQA, adopt Resolution No. 19-113 for Application and Review Procedures for Projects proposed pursuant to Senate Bill 35 with an amendment to the language in Section 5, page 3 of the resolution to read, “…. the City will determine whether the project conflicts with any of all of the required objective planning standards.” The motion carried unanimously. Council also directed staff:  Regarding Application Checklist Item # 5, consider requiring a title report prepared within the last one month if appropriate. Also consider requiring submission of a hyperlinked title report.  Consider color coding the square footage exhibit to visually demonstrate residential, non-residential, and shared uses. Encourage applicants to also color code their plan exhibits demonstrating compliance with the 2/3 residential requirement.  Consider explaining how square footage in structures utilized by both residential and non-residential uses will be credited proportionally to intended use. 09/17/19 13 of 132  City should double check all square footage calculations submitted with an application.  As the Council makes updates to the objective standards in the municipal code, make sure to also update the Application Package, as necessary.  Consider publishing/providing the City’s standard conditions of approval along with the Application Package (including any revocation standards).  Amend Section 5 on page 3 of the Resolution to read “the City will determine whether the project conflicts with any of all of the required objective planning standards.” 13. Subject: Options for unofficial transcription of City Council meetings (continued from July 16) Recommended Action: Receive options for unofficial transcription of City Council meetings and provide direction to staff to use the free YouTube auto -captioning feature for transcription of Council meetings. City Clerk Grace Schmidt reviewed the staff report. Council received options for unofficial transcription of City Council meetings and provided direction to staff to try the free YouTube auto-captioning feature for transcription of Council and other City meetings. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - CONTINUED (As necessary) Brent Bardsley (Cupertino resident) talked about parcel taxes for rental units built at Vallco. COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Councilmembers highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events. City Manager Deborah Feng noted that documents regarding Regnart Creek, including options, would be posted September 6 and that the staff report would be ready for review by September 9. ADJOURNMENT At 9:43 p.m., Mayor Scharf adjourned the meeting. 09/17/19 14 of 132 _______________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk 09/17/19 15 of 132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 17, 2019 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for I&P Runway, LLC (dba Ippudo Ramen), 19540 Vallco Parkway, Suite #130. Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for I&P Runway, LLC (dba Ippudo Ramen), 19540 Vallco Parkway, Suite #130. Description Name of Business: Ippudo Ramen Location: 19450 Vallco Parkway, Suite #130 Type of Business: Restaurant Type of License: 41 – On-Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place (Restaurant) Reason for Application: Original Fees, Annual Fee Discussion There are no other zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed. Therefore, staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 41 authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. This business is located in Main Street Cupertino. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Jeffrey Tsumura, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development Approved for Submission by: Deborah Feng, City Manager Attachment: A - Application COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 09/17/19 16 of 132 09/17/19 17 of 132 09/17/19 18 of 132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 17, 2019 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Stak Partners, LLC (dba El Greco Grill), 20080 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #104. Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Stak Partners, LLC (dba El Greco Grill), 20080 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #104. Description Name of Business: El Greco Grill Location: 20080 Steven Creek Boulevard, Suite #104 Type of Business: Restaurant Type of License: 41 – On-Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place (Restaurant) Reason for Application: Original Fees, Annual Fee Discussion There are no other zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed. Therefore, staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 41 authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. This business is located in the Biltmore Shopping Center. This space was previously occupied by Jersey Mikes. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Jeffrey Tsumura, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development Approved for Submission by: Deborah Feng, City Manager Attachment: A - Application COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 09/17/19 19 of 132 09/17/19 20 of 132 09/17/19 21 of 132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 17, 2019 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Little Dipper Cupertino, LLC (dba Little Dipper Shabu Shabu), 20588 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Little Dipper Cupertino, LLC (dba Little Dipper Shabu Shabu), 20588 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Description Name of Business: Little Dipper Shabu Shabu Location: 20588 Stevens Creek Boulevard Type of Business: Restaurant Type of License: 47 – On-Sale General – Eating Place (Restaurant) Reason for Application: Annual Fee, Person-to-Person Transfer Discussion A Conditional Use Permit (U-1993-14) for the previous tenant (Hong Fu Restaurant) was approved by Planning Commission on January 24, 1994 to allow the expansion of the existing restaurant and bar facility. This prior approval remains active for Little Dipper Shabu Shabu as an existing use pending ABC license issuance. There are no other zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed. Therefore, staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 47 authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the licenses premises and authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the licenses premises. This business will be located in the Cupertino Crossroads Shopping Center in the space previously occupied by Hong Fu Restaurant. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 09/17/19 22 of 132 Prepared by: Jeffrey Tsumura, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development Approved for Submission by: Deborah Feng, City Manager Attachment: A - Application 09/17/19 23 of 132 09/17/19 24 of 132 09/17/19 25 of 132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 17, 2019 Subject Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Ramen United, Inc. (dba Afuri Ramen & Dumpling), 20803 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #110. Recommended Action Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Ramen United, Inc. (dba Afuri Ramen & Dumpling), 20803 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #110. Description Name of Business: Afuri Ramen & Dumpling Location: 20803 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite #110 Type of Business: Restaurant Type of License: 41 – On-Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place (Restaurant) Reason for Application: Annual Fee Discussion There are no other zoning or use permit restrictions which would prohibit the sale of alcohol as proposed. Therefore, staff has no objection to the issuance of this license. License Type 41 authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. This business is located in the Saich Way Station Shopping Center. This space was previously occupied by The Melt. Sustainability Impact None Fiscal Impact None _____________________________________ Prepared by: Jeffrey Tsumura, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development Approved for Submission by: Deborah Feng, City Manager Attachment: A - Application COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 www.cupertino.org 09/17/19 26 of 132 09/17/19 27 of 132 09/17/19 28 of 132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 17, 2019 Subject Approve option to use design-build procurement for qualifying projects and establish a corresponding conflict-of-interest limitation pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq. Recommended Action Adopt Resolution No. ____ approving the use of design-build project delivery pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq., and establish a corresponding conflict-of- interest limitation pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22162. Discussion The City Council has indicated its interest in having the option of using design-build delivery for future public works projects as an alternative to conventional design -bid- build project delivery. Benefits of design-build delivery could include reduced project costs, expedited project completion, and superior design features. Using design-build procurement, a single entity, known as the “design-build entity” (DBE) provides both design and construction for a project. In theory, this process can afford greater integration of services and provides a single entity responsible for both design and construction. By contrast, with conventional design-bid-build delivery process, the City initially contracts with a design firm to develop plans and specifications for a project, and then bids out the project to a qualified contractor to construct the project as designed. However, even with design-build procurement, the City will need to separately retain the services of a design professional (architect or engineer) to develop preliminary project documents, often referred to as “bridging documents” or “requirement documents”, which are used during the design-build procurement. City use of design-build procurement is governed by Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq., which is currently scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2024. (All subsequent statutory references are to the Public Contract Code, unless otherwise specified.) Only certain types of projects may be procured on a design-build basis. Pursuant to section 22161(g), a qualifying “project” includes “the construction of a building or 09/17/19 29 of 132 buildings and improvements directly related to the construction of a building or buildings . . . and park and recreational facilities, but does not include the construction of other infrastructure, including, but not limited to, streets and highways, public rail transit, or water resources facilities and infrastructure .” A qualified project also includes construction of wastewater, solid waste management, or water recycling facilities. Prior to using the design-build process, City Council must approve use of design-build procurement pursuant to section 22162(a), which also establishes a $1,000,000 minimum on qualifying projects. The draft resolution approves the use of design-build project delivery for any qualifying project in excess of $1,000,000 which the Director of Public Works has determined could be delivered more efficiently using design -build instead of design-bid-build procurement. For specific projects that the City intends to procure using design-build, City Council will approve the award of a contract to a design professional for preparation of the preliminary bridging documents when the contract amount requires Council approval under the City’s procurement policy, and the City Council will consider the approval of any subsequent contract awarded to a design build entity. Section 22162(c) further provides that a city must adopt conflict-of-interest guidelines, “consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity, that performs services for the local agency relating to the solicitation of a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity, or to join a design-build team.” Applicable law includes Government Code section 1090, which can apply to outside consultants, including design professionals, who are involved in the development of a public contract (e.g., by preparing bridging/requirement documents). The draft resolution complies with section 22162(c) and Government Code section 1090, by providing that any person or entity providing services for the City related to solicitation of a design-build project, including, but not limited to, services pertaining to preparation of the preliminary documents required pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22164(a), may not submit a proposal as a design-build entity or join a design-build team for that project. Subject to the draft resolution being adopted by Council and the Director of Public Works determining that a project could be delivered more efficiently using design-build instead of design-bid-build procurement the design-build procurement would proceed in four stages: (1) Pursuant to section 22164(a), the City retains a licensed design professional to develop bridging documents for the project, including the scope and estimated price, and which may also include preliminary plans, building layouts, performance specifications, etc. 09/17/19 30 of 132 (2) The City issues a request for qualifications (RFQ) pursuant to section 22164(b) to either prequalify or short-list the design-build entities who will then be eligible to submit proposals during the next stage. (3) The City issues a request for proposals (RFP) pursuant to section 22164(d) to prequalified or short-listed design-build entities. (4) Proposals are evaluated as specified in section 22164, which may include discussion and negotiation with proposers, and the design-build contract may be awarded to the design-build entity that offers the best value or that submits the lowest price, depending on the RFP requirements. In addition, there are requirements for an “enforceable commitment” to use a “skilled and trained workforce” which must be addressed at the RFQ stage pursuant to section 22162(c), which states: “(c) (1) A design-build entity shall not be prequalified or shortlisted unless the entity provides an enforceable commitment to the local agency that the entity and its subcontractors at every tier will use a skilled and trained workforce to perform all work on the project or contract that falls within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades, in accordance with Chapter 2.9 (commencing with Section 2600) of Part 1.” The term “skilled and trained workforce” is defined in detail in section 2601(d), and generally requires that a specified percentage of journeypersons and subcontractors are graduates of apprenticeship programs. There are exceptions to the “enforceable commitment” requirement that may apply if the City enters into a project labor agreement, as further specified in section 22161(c)(2). However, the City is not required to enter into a project labor agreement as a precondition to using design-build procurement pursuant to section 22160 et seq. With adoption of the draft resolution, qualifying public works projects may be delivered and constructed on a design-build basis, subject to the applicable legal limitations and requirements and City Council approval for construction award. Sustainability Impact No sustainability impact. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impact. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Roger Lee, Director of Public Works 09/17/19 31 of 132 Reviewed by: Michael Zimmerman, CIP Program Manager Approved for Submission by: Deborah Feng, City Manager Attachments: A – Draft Resolution 09/17/19 32 of 132 RESOLUTION NO. ____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE USE OF DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT DELIVERY PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 22160 ET SEQ., AND ESTABLISHING A CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST LIMITATION PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 22162 WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq. authorizes local agencies, including cities, to use the design-build method of project delivery for qualifying projects in excess of $1,000,000, and sets forth requirements for use of design-build project delivery; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has declared that the design-build method of project delivery, which may use a best value procurement methodology, has reported benefits, including reduced project costs, expedited project completion, and design features that are not achievable through the traditional design-bid-build method; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22162(a), City Council approval is required in order to procure design-build contracts for qualifying public works projects in excess of $1,000,000; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to approve the use of design-build project delivery pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq. for any qualifying project in excess of $1,000,000 which the Director of Public Works has determined could be delivered more efficiently using design-build instead of design- bid-build procurement; and WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22162(c) requires local agencies to develop conflict-of-interest guidelines, consistent with applicable law, regarding the ability of a person or entity that performs services relating to the solicitation for a design-build project, to submit a proposal as a design-build entity or to join a design- build team. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the use of design-build project delivery pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22160 et seq. for any qualifying project in excess of $1,000,000 which the Director of Public Works has determined could be delivered more efficiently using 09/17/19 33 of 132 design-build instead of design-bid-build procurement, subject to the conflict-of- interest limitation set forth herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any person or entity providing services for the City related to the solicitation of a design-build project, including, but not limited to, services pertaining to preparation of the preliminary documents required pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22164(a), may not submit a proposal as a design-build entity or join a design-build team for that project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution, which pertains to general authorization of use of design-build project delivery for future qualifying projects, is not a project under the requirements of the California Quality Act of 1970, together with related State CEQA Guidelines (collectively, “CEQA”) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, either directly or ultimately. In the event that this Resolution is found to be a project under CEQA, it is subject to the CEQA exemption contained in CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty to have no possibility of a significant effect on the environment. CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential of causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. In this circumstance, the authorization would have no or only a de minimis impact on the environment. The foregoing determination is made by the City Council in its independent judgment. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this ____ day of __________ 2019, by the following vote. Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 09/17/19 34 of 132 SIGNED: ________ Steven Scharf, Mayor City of Cupertino ________________________ Date ATTEST: ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk ________________________ Date 09/17/19 35 of 132 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY HALL 10 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 www.cupertino.org CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 17, 2019 Subject Receive information report and presentation on Regnart Creek Trail 65% design and revised estimated costs; consideration of various trail improvement options (some of which also include on-street bicycle improvements) and alternative trail alignments to the proposed trail (on-street Alternatives 4 and 5); and, if design of the proposed trail continues, consider an increase to the design and environmental budget. Recommended Actions Receive information report and presentation on Regnart Creek Trail 65% design and revised estimated costs; trail improvement options, and Alternatives 4 and 5 to the proposed trail; and if Council continues to move forward with design of the proposed trail: 1. Provide direction to staff regarding completion of design with a preferred trail improvement option A, B, C, D, E, or F; and 2. Adopt draft Resolution 19-XXX amending the FY 2019/20 Capital Improvement Program budget to increase the budget to perform design and environmental clearance services from $538,000 to $813,000. Background The Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan (Bike Plan) was adopted by the City Council in 2016. Similarly, the Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan (Ped Plan) was adopted by City Council in 2018. Within these Plans the Regnart Creek Trail (Project), which is ranked as a Tier 2 priority project in the Bike Plan and a Tier 1 project in the Ped Plan, was identified as a vital connector of the neighborhood to local destinations in the vicinity of the creek, including the Cupertino Library and Civic Center, Wilson Park, and Creekside Park. The Project was also recognized in the Plans as a critical link for schoolchildren on their route to school and to access the above destinations. The City Council authorized the funding of the Regnart Cre ek Trail feasibility study during the FY16/17 budget process with the feasibility study commencing in September 2017 and adopted by City Council in August 2018. Included in the action of the City Council in August 2018 was the authorization to proceed with design and environmental clearance. The below flowchart illustrates the timeline for the Project. (this area intentional left blank) 09/17/19 36 of 132 Current Status of Project As the Project has progressed through the design phase, additional information has been collected from resident input, the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water), and physical inspections at the site. As a result, City staff’s understanding of Project attributes and constraints has grown. During this process, it has remained feasible to build the Project as a multi-use path. Attachment A is letter from Valley Water dated September 6, 2019 indicating that the Project meets their standards. Attachment I documents the items that remain in progress with Valley Water. Estimated costs have also increased, and the reasons are described in detail within the Discussion section, below. City staff, with the assistance of the consulting engineer (HMH Engineers) have reached an approximate 65% design level for the Project. Reaching this 65% design milestone has been the result of a focused effort of working through design challenges, as well as ongoing community and stakeholder engagement. Reporting to the City Council the status of a project at 65% is not typical, as design normally proceeds to 100% prior to reporting to Council. The purpose in bringing forward a 65% project design is to detail:  Proposed trail improvements with additional specificity in order to provide more information for residents concerned with the Project. 09/17/19 37 of 132  How Valley Water requirements are being incorporated into the Project.  How resident requests for privacy considerations are being incorporated into the Project. The City has offered to meet individually with all 84 affected property owners and has conducted 42 such meetings to date. Many property owners have declined to meet with staff to discuss how the City may mediate and incorporate privacy concerns into the Project. Instead, some property owners have demonstrated interest in stopping the Project in lieu of discussion with the City. This has prevented the City staff from being able to detail how privacy considerations are being incorporated into the Project for all adjacent properties. In April 2019, the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission (BPC) passed a motion to oppose the on-street improvement Alternate 4. The context of this action was that the Regnart Creek Trail Alignment was preferred over Alternate 4 in the feasibility study. The BPC did not separately consider Alternative 5. Alternate 4 proposes to use Pacifica Drive, Blaney Avenue, and La Mar Drive as a bikeway connection between the Civic Center area and Creekside Park. In June 2019, the BPC passed a motion that the BPC wanted to see the 65% design before it went to City Council. Staff did attempt to call a special meeting of the BPC last week for this purpose. Neither the chair nor a majority of the BPC Commissioners wanted a special meeting. Consequently, the BPC has not reviewed or made any additional recommendations regarding the design options being considered in this report. Community Outreach and Engagement The City has engaged in a robust community outreach and engagement during the initial design phase of the Project. This included community meetings on:  December 20, 2018  April 24, 2019  March 30, 2019. (“Walkshop” along the trail and along Alternative 4) In order to reach as many residents and community members as possible, outreach events were announced through several channels online and through postcard mailings. Information about the events was shared through social media on NextDoor, Twitter, and Facebook. Additional outreach included emails to subscribers of the City’s “Regnart Creek Trail” e-notifications, emails to participants from previous outreach events, flyer postings, notifications from Cupertino Safe Routes to Schools group, and the posting of door hangers on residences adjacent to the proposed trail. Staff maintained an active online presence by posting outreach materials, meeting presentations, and outreach summaries following each event on the City’s Project website. 09/17/19 38 of 132 As described above, the City attempted to meet with all households adjacent to the trail alignment and was successful in meeting with half of these households between March 18 and April 12, 2019. During these meetings, residents were able to express their individual concerns, and to ask questions about the Project. Feedback received at the meetings was documented and used to inform many design decisions made to date. This feedback is included as Attachment B. Discussion If constructed, the Project would follow the existing creek alignment between Pacifica Drive and E. Estates Drive, where it would connect to the existing Creekside Trail into Creekside Park. See Attachment C for trail alignment. Near Pacifica Drive, a separate and fully-funded McClellan Road Separated Bike Lane project terminates near Torre Avenue on the east and Monta Vista High School to the w est. This McClellan Road Separated Bike Lane project is currently under construction and is scheduled for completion by the summer of 2022. The Project would include two roadway crossings, at S. Blaney Avenue and at E. Estates Drive. The alignment is primarily within the Valley Water right-of-way and would use the existing Valley Water maintenance/access road along most of its length. The 65% design plans are included as Attachment C. The feasibility study and community outreach efforts identified many k ey issues and concerns to be further worked out during completion of Project design. These issues include:  Concerns from adjacent property owners regarding privacy, security and noise  Maintaining Valley Water access requirements for creek maintenance and erosion control  Trail user safety, both along the trail and at the street crossings  Construction and ongoing maintenance costs  Liability, for the City and for adjacent property owners  Adherence to published guidelines and standards for trail design Each of these issues will be discussed further in turn, below. Privacy, Security and Noise The City has been working closely with the property owners adjacent to the creek in order to understand and attempt to address concerns regarding privacy, security and noise. The concerns primarily include vandalism, burglary, disturbing of peace, personal safety, and damage to property (fencing). While experience countywide with properties adjacent to trails indicates that these properties are no more susceptible to these problems than properties not adjacent to trails, City staff acknowledges the concerns and have proposed measures to help address them. These include replacement of backyard fencing with more robust or taller wooden fencing, replacement of 09/17/19 39 of 132 backyard fencing with a concrete block wall, installation of security cameras, sheriff monitoring, and closure of the trail at night. In discussions with property owners, the reactions to these measures have varied. While several property owners have expressed interest in new fencing, many have not and would prefer no changes to their backyard setting. To accommodate these differences, staff recommends that existing wood fences be replaced when requested by the property owner. The cost to replace fencing is approximately $50/linear foot for wooden fencing and $500/linear foot for a concrete block wall. It is staff’s opinion that wooden fencing is sufficient and provides for a more context-sensitive solution than a concrete block wall; additionally, a concrete block wall would likely encroach further into private property due to its increased thickness. However, either solution is feasible. An approximate upper limit to the cost to replace fencing is $130,000 for wooden fencing and $1,300,000 for a concrete block wall, if all fencing abutting the trail is replaced. These costs would be substantially higher if all fences along both sides of the creek are replaced. For the construction cost estimate accompanying the 65% design, it was assumed that 2,600 linear feet of wood fence would be replaced at a cost of $130,000. All options presented in Attachment G assume that 2,600 linear feet of fencing will be replaced. The 400-foot-long segment of existing public-use trail fronting properties along Lozano Lane and De Palma Lane within Valley Water property presents a unique situation (see below photo). Along this segment, the trail runs in very close proximity to the front yards and front doors of several private residences, with no screening currently separating the two. Options for screening along this segment are limited due to Valley Water requirements that no permanent structures, trees, or other plantings be placed within their property. 09/17/19 40 of 132 City staff has attempted to work closely with the residents along this segment to address concerns of privacy and security, and has a goal in having solutions identified prior to 100% design completion. Some solutions for the Lozano Lane properties potentially include removal and replacement of existing fencing with fencing that provides more privacy and/or removable privacy fencing, street furniture or planter boxes on Valley Water property. For the trail segment fronting properties along De Palma Lane, where there is the additional consideration of the shared space between the trail and the private driveway, potential solutions include separating the trail from the private driveway with raised pavement mar kers, and/or reconstructing the driveway and replacing it with a textured pavement shared space area (similar to the “Woonerf” concept in Europe) where bicyclists and vehicles are encouraged to proceed cautiously. All options presented in Attachment G provide up to $40,000 for these potential improvements. With respect to security along the trail, experience countywide with trails has not shown the need for security cameras. However, cameras could be wired closed-circuit to an archived recording system that could be accessed in the event of an incident. With the installation of security cameras, signs indicating the presence of cameras would also be placed at trail entrances. The cost to install a network of security cameras depends heavily upon many factors, including the source of power, ability or desirability to transmit wirelessly, and number of cameras. A very approximate cost estimate for installation of a complete system is $300,000. Installation of cameras is not recommended and no costs for cameras has been included in the cost of any options shown in Attachment G. The Sheriff’s Department has indicated that they would patrol the trail regularly, including during the night hours. They also have bicycle patrols that would be used for this purpose. Public trails in the region are typically closed from dusk to dawn, through signage and monitoring. Gates at trail entrances are generally not closed and locked nightly. Doing so is resource-intensive, as the trail would need to be surveyed each evening prior to closure to ensure that no trail users would be inadvertently trapped behind the closure. In the event Council desires to have trail gates locked at night, the ongoing operational cost to lock gates at the trail entrances each evening is approximately $54,000 annually. Closure of gates at trail entrances is not recommended due to the additional operational cost. Installation of security cameras and the addition of an activity to close gates could be implemented following opening of the trail if the need or desire surfaces, however, some disruption to trail use would occur due to the need to install conduits for video cable. Valley Water Access and Maintenance City staff has had several meetings with Valley Water staff in order to understand their requirements for creek access for the purposes of regular maintenance and erosion control. Valley Water’s general requirements are: 09/17/19 41 of 132  Maintain 12-foot clear width everywhere for maintenance vehicle access;  Any railing must be removable in order to allow easy access to creek banks;  Maintenance vehicles must be able to access the creek bed throughout;  Valley Water reserves the right to close the trail at any time for maintenance or other needs: and  A Joint Use Agreement must be executed between Valley Water and the City in order to clearly delineate respective responsibilities. The 65% design includes a design for a removable railing between the creek and the trail at the top of bank that maintains the required 12-foot clearance throughout the trail. The railing is proposed to consist of wooden split rails supported by steel posts which are inserted into steel sleeves imbedded in the ground near the top of bank. In addition, the proposed bridge between the trail and Wilson Park will be removable, so that Valley Water trucks will be able to drive unimpeded along the creek bed during the infrequent times that this is necessary. The bridge will consist of prefabricated steel and have a 12-foot clear width. The Joint Use Agreement that will be negotiated with Valley Water and considered for authorization by the City Council will clearly delineate the City’s and Valley Water’s responsibilities relating to trail closures, and a detour plan would be worked out in advance to ensure trail users have sufficient notice (unless the trail is closed for emergency purposes) and alternate routes available to them. Given that Valley Water’s requirements have been met, they have no opposition to the Project and will enter into a Joint Use Agreement with the City, to be executed at a later date prior to construction. Trail User Safety Creekside trails throughout the region are varied with respect to the inclusion of railing separating the trail from the creek bank. While Valley Water would generally prefer that railing not be installed due to the potential impact on maintenance operations, as stated previously they will accept railing if it can be removed and if it does not restrict access. During community outreach events, there was nearly unanimous support for railing in order to enhance trail user safety. As a result, options A-E design (as shown in Attachment G) includes the provision for removable railing, meeting Valley Water’s requirements, throughout the extent of the trail. Option F, which is not recommended by staff, only provides railings at trail head locations. The trail street crossings at Blaney Avenue and E. Estates Drive are being designed for pedestrian crossing safety using best current design practices. At Blaney Avenue, the crossing will consist of three-foot-wide bulb-outs on each side of the street, reducing the total crossing distance to 30 feet, along with pedestrian-actuated rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB’s) to warn drivers. Where trail users exit onto Blaney Avenue, a mild chicane treatment will be included in order to discourage bicyclists from riding directly into the street. The trail crossing at E. Estates Drive will also consist of bulb-outs and RRFB’s; and since E. Estates Drive is a lower-volume residential street, a raised 09/17/19 42 of 132 crosswalk will also be provided. All options presented in Attachment G provide these street crossing treatments. Attachment D provides a drawing of a proposed intersection crossing. For option A & B, the multi-use trail will be, at a minimum, eight-foot paved with two- foot earth shoulders on each side. For options C-F, the trail footpath will be, at a minimum, eight-foot decomposed granite with two-foot earth shoulders on each side. Where width allows, most notably along the reach between Pacifica Drive and Rodrigues Avenue, a 10-foot paved width will be provided with two-foot earth shoulders on each side (option A & B) or a 10-foot decomposed granite path with two- foot earth shoulders (option C-F). Some members of the community have expressed concern about the perceived narrowness of the trail. However, although not required, the trail meets Caltrans Class I standards, and it is consistent with (and even wider than some) successful and popular shared-use trails countywide. Exhibit F highlights the widths of several existing popular bicycle/pedestrian trails throughout the County. The exception to this is the segment fronting properties along De Palma Lane a nd Lozano Lane, where a utility pole creates a pinch point, reducing the width to 10.5 feet. This area will be highlighted with warning signs and striping. Emergency vehicles will be able to access all points along the trail. Construction and Ongoing Maintenance Costs The current construction estimate for the trail including contingencies is:  Option A - $5,000,000  Option B - $3,400,000  Option C - $2,800,000  Option D - $2,200,000  Option E - $2,000,000  Option F - $1,600,000 See Attachment G for options A-F construction cost estimates. The cost increase of $2.9M or 138% from the previous estimate of $2.1M for option A are as a result of several factors:  Trench drain and drainage items (=$250,000): A trench drain was added along the entirety of the creekside portions of the corridor to address Valley Water’s concerns of capturing additional runoff in the event the porous pavement becomes clogged.  Removable split rail fence with steel posts (=$300,000): With the results of the geotechnical report, detailed topographic survey, and clear guidance regarding maintenance widths, it has been determined that in order to meet various requirements and achieve a sufficient soil passive pressure for horizontal railing loading, a narrow and deep foundation concept is necessary. This feature is more costly than traditional railing foundations. Additionally, a greater length of railings has been assumed for the 65% plans 09/17/19 43 of 132  Water pollution control (=$150,000): This is an additional item in anticipation of additional requirements from Valley Water regarding protection of the creek during construction.  Valley Water ramp relocation (=$370,000): Relocation of Valley Water maintenance ramps to the north side of the creek, and associated environmental permitting, to avoid Wilson Park baseball field impacts resulting from the originally proposed western bridge location.  Additional required detailing of bridge abutments due to constrained condition (=$120,000)  Roadway improvement additional required detailing (=$100,000)  General escalation of costs over the past couple years (=$1,610,000) Opportunities to value engineer the project between 65% design and 100% design to reduce costs include:  Reduction in width of bridge from 12’ to 10’. Estimated savings $20,000  Elimination of trench drain. Estimated savings: $250,000  Conversion of trench drain to valley gutter. Estimated savings: $100,000  Reduction in extent of top-of-bank railing. Estimated savings: $100/linear foot  Reduction in privacy fence replacement. Estimated savings: $50/linear foot Additionally, staff considered several reduced-scope options. A summary table of these alternative options is shown in Exhibit G and summarized below:  Option A: This is a highest-cost scenario and consists of full grading and drainage improvements along with an aggregate base and asphalt pavement for the entire trail surface. Railings would be provided along the top-of-bank throughout. 2,600 linear feet of concrete block wall privacy fencing replacement is assumed.  Option B: This is similar to Option A, except 2,600 linear feet of wooden fencing, rather than concrete block wall fencing, is assumed.  Option C: This option would construct full grading and drainage improve ments along with an aggregate base for the trail surface to allow for possible future asphalt improvements. The final surface would be decomposed granite. Railings would be provided along the top-of-bank at trailheads and along the segment between Blaney Avenue and E. Estates Drive. 2,600 linear feet of wooden privacy fencing replacement is assumed. “Alternate 4” on-street bikeway improvements would also be constructed.  Option D: This option would consist of only minor grading and drainage improvements, along with an aggregate base for the trail surface to allow for possible future asphalt improvements. The final surface would be decomposed granite. Railings would be provided along the top-of-bank at trailheads and along the segment between Blaney Avenue and E. Estates Drive. 2,600 linear feet of wooden privacy fencing replacement is assumed. “Alternate 4” on-street bikeway improvements would also be constructed. 09/17/19 44 of 132  Option E: This option would consist of only minor grading and drainage improvements, along with an aggregate base for the trail surface to allow for possible future asphalt improvements. The final surface would be decomposed granite. Railings would be provided along the top-of-bank at trailheads and along the segment between Blaney Avenue and E. Estates Drive. 2,600 linear feet of wooden privacy fencing replacement is assumed. “Alternate 4” on-street bikeway improvements would also be constructed.  Option F: This option would consist of only minor grading and drainage improvements, along with an aggregate base for the trail surface to allow for possible future asphalt improvements. The final surface would be decomposed granite. Railings would be provided only at trailheads. 2,600 linear feet of wooden privacy fencing replacement is assumed. “Alternate 4” on-street bikeway improvements would not be constructed. This option is not recommended by staff. All options include full pedestrian crossing safety improvements at Blaney Avenue and E. Estates Drive and assume that Valley Water access ramps across from Wilson Park will be relocated to the north side of the creek. No new staff is required, however ongoing maintenance is expected to cost approximately $15,000 to $20,000 annually for a decomposed granite trail surface, $10,000 to $15,000 for an asphalt trail surface, and $20,000 every three years for railing removal and re-installation to accommodate Valley Water maintenance activities if railing is provided along the entire trail. Liability Government Code § 831.4 provides that public entities are not responsible for injuries caused by a condition of any unpaved road which provides access to fishing, hunting, camping, hiking, riding (animal and vehicular), watersports, recreational or scenic areas or any trail (paved or unpaved) used for these purposes. The law also protects private property owners who deed public easements (access rights) to municipalities for those same recreational purposes. California courts interpret the immunity provided by Section 831.4 broadly, encompassing paved and unpaved trails and roads, even sidewalks and paths that are used for a recreational purpose, including hiking, biking, skating, etc., or used for providing access to another recreational area. The immunity applies to negligent maintenance, design or the location of trails. A policy will be written by Public Works to document the responsibilities of the City regarding the preservation of private fences immediately adjacent to public trails. In this policy it will state that the City will be responsible for the timely abatement of graffiti and that the City will make timely repairs to private fencing if the fencing is damaged by the public or the City. The City will only make repairs if it receives property owner permission. Homeowners will be responsible to replace their fences when they reach end of life. 09/17/19 45 of 132 Adherence to Published Standards and Guidelines Standards and guidelines covering trail design are addressed in a wide variety of documents, including the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM), the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, and the Uniform Interjurisdictional Trail Design, Use and Management Guidelines (UD) prepared by the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Commission. These documents differ somewhat in their recommendations, and ultimately it is the project engineer’s discretion to design a safe and functional facility based upon these recommendations, the current state of the practice, and the site-specific conditions. The two most important design considerations relate to the provision of railing along the top of the creek bank and the width of the trail. Railing is being proposed along the entire length of the trail (options A-E) conforming to or exceeding requirements of all standards and guidelines. A minimum eight-foot paved trail with two-foot earth shoulders (options A & B) or a minimum eight-foot de-composed granite trail with two- foot earth shoulders (options C-E) is being provided everywhere, and more where space is available. Although some guidelines, such as the UD, recommend an optimum width of 12 feet with two-foot shoulders, the HDM requires a minimum paved width of eight feet with two-foot earth shoulders, with which the Regnart Creek Trail would conform. Additionally, shared-use trails across the County frequently have widths that do not meet one or more of these standards, including the Saratoga Creek Trail, San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail, and the Los Gatos Creek Trail, and all function satisfactorily. Bridges and Impacts to Wilson Park Baseball Field The current 65% design plans for the trail includes two bridges between the trail and Wilson Park. The purpose of the bridges is to provide trailhead access from Wilson Park and to provide access around an existing concrete Valley Water maintenance access ramp on the south side of the creek immediately adjacent to Wilson Park. Staff is now proposing that the existing ramp be moved to the north side of the creek. Relocation of the ramp does require environmental regulatory permits. The estimated additional cost in relocating the ramp, engineering, and the additional environmental compliance is $370,000, with a 12-18-month project delay. The bridge will be removable in order to allow Valley Water access to the creek bed with their maintenance vehicles. There are several long-term advantages to this approach, which include eliminating the cost and impacts of a second bridge, facilitating Valley Water creek access and maintenance, maintaining a trail alignment along the creek without the need to detour through Wilson Park, reducing the frequency of bridge removal for Valley Water maintenance, and eliminating the need to close the trail when the bridg e is removed. Cost estimates for all options (as shown in Attachment G) being currently considered by Council assume this approach is taken. Moving forward to 100% design plans, the 65% design will be modified to incorporate this change. 09/17/19 46 of 132 Alternatives to the Proposed Regnart Creek Trail The Regnart Creek Trail Feasibility Study identified four alternatives t o the creekside trail alignment. The most popular of these among residents adjacent to the Project, identified as “Alternative 4”, is an exclusively on-street alternative that proposes to use Pacifica Drive, Blaney Avenue, and La Mar Drive as a bikeway connection between the Civic Center area and Creekside Park. These streets were chosen as an alternate to the trail without regard to whether they had been identified for improvement within the Bicycle Transportation Plan, rather they were chosen for their ro ughly parallel alignment to the trail and their ability to provide a similar connection. Other alternatives include a mix of on- and off-street alignments which use portions of Wilson Park and the creek maintenance road. Alternative 4 proposes a Class III bikeway (bicycle boulevard) along La Mar Drive, and a Class III or Class II (striped bike lane) treatment along Pacifica Drive, subject to further analysis. There would also be an enhanced crossing of Blaney Avenue at Pacifica Drive (for eastbound bicyclists) and at La Mar Drive (for westbound bicyclists). There would be no direct access to Wilson Park. As the most popular of the non-creekside trail alternatives, staff reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of Alternative 4. The advantages include (1) lower cost; (2) potentially lower impact to adjacent residences; and (3) quicker implementation. The disadvantages include (1) decreased level of safety and encouragement for bicyclists; (2) little advantage for pedestrians; (3) one additional crossing of Blaney Avenue; and (4) inconsistency with goals of the Bicycle Transportation Plan. It should be noted that this inconsistency exists only if Alternative 4 is improved in lieu of the creekside trail, since Policy 2.A.2 of the Bicycle Transportation Plan states, “Identify opportunities to reduce bicyclist exposure by …providing dedicated and separated facilities where feasible,” and a creekside trail is feasible in this case. Improvements to the streets identified with Alternative 4, if done in conjunction with a creekside trail, would not violate Bicycle Transportation Plan goals. Based on an initial concept design, the estimated cost to design and construct Alternative 4 is $530,000, including contingencies. This could be constructed for significantly less cost if pop-up-type bollards are used to delineate the bulb-outs, rather than reconstructing the curb with permanent concrete improvements. In this case, the work could be completed for an estimated $175,000. Similarly, there was some interest expressed for “Alternative 5” from the feasibility study. Alternative 5 proposes to use the existing Class II bike lanes on Rodrigues Avenue, and on-street bike route along Parkside Lane and Vicksburg Drive, and a path through Wilson Park to connect Parkside Lane w ith Vicksburg Drive. Similar to Alternative 4, these streets were also chosen for their ability to provide a similar connection as the trail and without regard to their inclusion within the Bicycle Transportation Plan. The advantages of Alternative 5 include (1) lower cost; (2) potentially lower impact to adjacent residences; and (3) faster implementation. The disadvantages include (1) decreased level of safety and encouragement for bicyclists; (2) 09/17/19 47 of 132 no advantage for pedestrians; (3) inconsistency with the goals of the Bicycle Transportation Plan (if improved without creekside trail improvements, similar to the Alternative 4 discussion above); and (4) difficulty safely navigating bicyclists through the often-crowded Wilson Park parking lot and along the Wilson Park trails. Of these disadvantages, the first and fourth are of particularly significant concern. Rodrigues Avenue is a curving, two-lane roadway with high-turnover on-street parking, many high-use driveways and only part-time bike lanes along the eastern segment on the south side. Additionally, the Wilson Park parking lot and Parkside Lane area become very congested during scheduled sporting events at the park, making navigating the area on bike very challenging. For these reasons, staff does not recommend any further consideration of Alternative 5. The estimated cost to design and construct Alternative 5 is $50,000-$250,000. The wide range in costs is due largely to the uncertainty regarding whether the existing paths through Wilson Park will be widened to Class I standards in order to accommodate the increased shared bicycle-pedestrian use. The existing path is approximately 7.5’ wide with no shoulders and is likely inadequate for this increased usage. Attachment E shows the potential alignment for both Alternates 4 & 5. Staff recommends that, if the City Council recommends moving forward with Option C-E, that the improvements associated with Alternative 4 be constructed in addition to the trail improvements. Because Options C-E would construct a decomposed granite rather than asphalt trail, it is not intended for regular bicycle use and a complimentary on- street facility should be provided for that purpose. Similarly, as the proposed trail is closed during night hours, there are merits to including Alternate 4 improvements to any of the options. Next Steps As staff has previous City Council authority to proceed to 100% design, it is staff’s intention to take input received by the City Council at this meeting to progress towards a 100% design of the desired option A, B, C, D, E, or F selected. Although moving the design to the 100% level could be accomplished w ithin a few months, the regulatory agency review, approval and mitigation process will likely take anywhere between 9 and 15 months in order to receive final permits. As a result, a return to Council for approval of 100% design will likely occur Summer or Fall 2020. During this time, staff will continue to work closely with residents regarding their ongoing concerns and with Valley Water to draft a Joint Use Agreement, which will be presented to the Valley Water Board and to the City Council with the 100% design. When the 100% plans are complete, staff will agendize the item with Council for authority to advertise for a construction contract and to review required CEQA documents. At this time, staff will provide an update of estimated costs. Sustainability Impact Construction of the Regnart Creek Trail will encourage bicycling and reduce reliance on the single-occupancy vehicle and will therefore have a positive impact on sustainability. The trail is consistent with General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040 Policy M-1.3: 09/17/19 48 of 132 Regional Trail Development, Policy M-2.3: Connectivity, and Policy M-5.3: Connections to Trails. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, conforming to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will be completed. Staff anticipates commencing the 30-day public review period after the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is filed with the County Recorder’s Office. Fiscal Impact Total budget for Regnart Creek Trail is $538,000 and is included as part of the 2016 Bike Plan Implementation Project. Staff is requesting a $275,000 increase in the budget to $813,000 to complete the design and environmental review of the project. These additional dollars are due to many unforeseen complications to this project related to existing conditions, Valley Water requirements and preparation of engineering materials to support this 65% design check-in. To date, $357,790 has been expended on this project for feasibility and design (excluding staff time). The authorized budget for feasibility and design was $158,000 and $380,000, respectively. Previously approved but unspent budget have been carried forward to FY 2019-20. No new dollars have been allocated for this project in the FY19/20 Capital Improvement Budget. If a budget adjustment is approved it will be funded from the Capital Reserve projected fund balance for the reserve. As of FY 2018-19 the Capital Reserve is estimated to begin the year with $13.6M in fund balance. In FY 2019-20 it is estimated based on the amended budget the reserve will end the year with $12.9M. The $12.9M also includes an estimated $15M transfer in from the General fund excess unassigned fund balance. It is anticipated this transfer would occur as part of the Mid-Year Financial Report in March of 2020. With this adjustment the estimated year end fund balance for the Capital Reserve would be $12.24M. If Council approves continuing with the design of any of the options for this Project, $1,600,000 to $5,000,000 in additional dollars will be requested and required in the future to complete construction. This request may be made as early as mid -year 19/20 or for FY20/21. This request would further deplete the Capital Reserve to between $10.64M and $7.24M. Grant funding opportunities are available for this project, including through Santa Clara County’s 2016 Measure B program which allocates $250 million in funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects through a competitive program countywide. Staff is also researching other potential grant funding programs. If the project does not proceed beyond the 65% design, no additional funding is needed. _____________________________________ Prepared by: David Stillman, Transportation Manager Reviewed by: Roger Lee, Director of Public Works 09/17/19 49 of 132 Approved for Submission by: Deborah Feng, City Manager Attachments: A – Valley Water letter dated September 6, 2019 B – Community Outreach & Engagement C – 65% Plans D – Drawing of a proposed intersection crossing. E – Alternate 4 and 5 Alignments F – Popular Trail Widths G – Alternative Options Cost Comparison H – Resolution I – Items that Remain in Progress with Valley Water 09/17/19 50 of 132 Attachment A09/17/19 51 of 132 REGNART CREEK TRAIL ONE-ON-ONE RESIDENT MEETINGS DETAILS: March 18, 2019 through April 12, 2019 www.calendly.com/cityofcupertino/regnart-resident-meeting #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 3/19/19 @ 3:30pm Y The resident is concerned about Redwood trees because roots are spread into the trail path. High fence option will be a problem, as it will obstruct the sunlight. As the trail will be very close to the backyard, the resident is also concerned about privacy, sounds, and vegetation. Why separated Class IV bike lanes are not considered on Rodrigues Avenue and Blaney Avenue. During heavy rains, the creek flows like a river which will be dangerous for the trail users. Also concerned about how midblock crossing will affect the Blaney traffic in peak hours and with the project, we will impact the existing greenery and scenic beauty. No 3/20/19 @ 3:30pm Y The proposed project is not a proper use of open space. Not interested in high fences and does not support the project. Love all the animals that live in the creek; the project will disturb the natural habitats and possibility of migration/shifting. De Palma Lane would be used by the trail users, which is a private street. Concerned about how midblock crossing will impact the Blaney traffic in peak hours. Considers the proposed project is an expensive project with bridges and fences. During the creek maintenance period all the fences and decks need to be removed and restored. Worried about the safety and security of the trail users, who will be monitoring the trail. It would be not good to complete the project up to Blaney Avenue; it should be continued to Creekside Park. Median island on the proposed midblock crossing is not advisable. Concerned about safety and privacy No 3/19/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about how midblock crossing will affect the Blaney traffic in the peak hours. Why alternative 4 was not considered. Don't like to share De Palma Ln with the trail users. is fine with the project if the neighbors are fine with the path. Will the project encourage the trail users to park their vehicles on De Palma Lane and walk on the trail. Did not provide any direction 4/2/19 @ 3:30pm --------- 4/2/19 @ 3:30pm --------- 4/2/19 @ 3:30pm NoCombined meeting. Concerned about safety, privacy, kids walking on the top of the bank, Car/Ped/bike collisions, illegal activities, trash, trail users using private property and graffiti. Who will be responsible for the accidents/graffiti/damage to the resident's property? Can we have a gate, which will stop trail users entering into the private property? Alternative 4 is a good option. Property values will go down. Because of the slope, there is a possibility of bicycle collisions, which is very unsafe. Water flow during rains is high and fast. It would be good if there is a proper separation between trail and roadway. All these things should be considered in the design. Y Page 1 of 9 09/17/19 52 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 4/2/19 @ 2:30pm ---Y Concerned about safety/privacy/ throwing garbage on the creek/noise/security. Will the emergency vehicles will have access to the trail. Why railing is not provided, it will be not safe if the fence is not provided. The path is narrow on specific locations. The second floor is clearly visible from the trail. Opposes the project. Reliability of city promises. No 4/3/19 @ 3:30pm Y Concerned about safety, noise, security, kids throwing rocks and someone breaking the windows. The homes where the trail will be facing front yards, their property values will go down. On-street options can be considered. Alternative 4 looks like a good option. Bikers need to be educated to follow the rules. Did not provide any direction 4/1/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about safety, noise and, security. Why other alternatives have not been considered. Does not support the trail. Will there be fencing on the creekside and how the creek will be monitored. Suggests considering for automatic closing gates from dusk to dawn and cameras facing trail. Did not provide any direction 3/19/19 @ 2:30pm Y Concerned about someone will jump over the fence, break the window, kids will throw the rocks, robbery e.t.c.Not interested in a tall fence. Cost of the project will be very high. Ground squirrels will be digging into the slopes, consider in the design. Some sections of the trail has a steep slope. During the rains, the flow of water in the creek is fast. No 3/28/19 @ 3:30pm Y Concerned about safety, noise and, security. Planting trees along the trail will be helpful to mitigate the noise. Construction shouldn't happen during the breeding season. Concerned about the fire hazard, if someone accidentally throws cigarette buds into bushes. Interested in a higher fence. Yes 3/28/19 @ 2:30pm Y Asked about the justification of the project, why the trail is needed and what will city gain from this project. is neutral about the project. Interested in having a higher fence. Proper measures should be taken so that the path does not attract crime and illegal activities. Yes Page 2 of 9 09/17/19 53 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 4/1/19 @ 3:30pm Y Concerned about safety and security. There have been burglaries recently. The second floor is clearly visible from the trail. Worried about who will be liable, if someone breaks a window; if someone throws smoke buds in the bushes and it catches fire; if someone runs into the fences and if tree fells down. Concerned that the proposed trail width is not per standards. If fencing is not provided, there is a probability of kids falling into the creek. The second floor is visible to the path. The recommended shoulder width of 2 feet is not sufficient. Need enough time to review 65 percent plans (2 to 3 weeks). The proposed trial of 8 feet with 2 feet shoulders on both sides is as per minimum criteria of Caltrans HDM manual, but AASHTO guidelines differ. The proposed project is not a promoter of a safe route to school program as the creek is very close to the trail. Water levels fluctuate rapidly. Why alternative 4 is not considered, as this a good option. Does not support the proposed project. How many kids are expected No -Y expressed privacy concerns related to the project and would like a taller wood fence as part of the design. didn't think a 1-on-1 meeting was necessary since relayed this message at the event. gave business card in case changed her mind or had additional questions/concerns. Yes @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about safety. Currently resident has a fence gate. Water flow during rains is high and fast. How can we prevent someone from falling into the creek/accident? It would be safe if we have a railing, as it will stop someone falling into the creek and drowning. Alternative 4 is a good option. Did not provide any direction 4/4/19 @ 3:00pm Y feels we shouldn't shield kids from the reality of traffic and potential conflicts, and should teach kids how to ride safely on the street. Feels that the trail gives a false sense of security. Would prefer to have bike lanes along La Mar. Concerns include no access for immediate residents, cost, Blaney crossing, and fence maintenance. Has a recently new fence and would consider adding a lattice extension for a taller fence. Yes 4/8/19 @ 3:00pm Y Avid bikers and advocates of trail although they may not use it. They have no problem riding onstreet. Thinks that security and privacy should not be a concern. Do have concerns about not providing a railing at the top of bank. Feels the trail is too narrow even without a railing and that people may fall into the creek. No Page 3 of 9 09/17/19 54 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 3/25/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about safety and privacy. The trail will attract homeless people and illegal activities like smoking pot and burglary. The second floor is visible to the path. bought this home last year only if the trail was active would not have purchased this home. The resident is also concerned that if someone bumps into the fence and will file a lawsuit on the owner. Will there be 24/7 surveillance for security and maintenance, as the water level raises very fast when it rains. Considers trail without fencing will cause problems. The slope is steep. Will the path will be 14 feet wide? Does not support the proposed project. Did not provide any direction 4/1/19 @ 2:30pm ---Y Concerned about safety and, privacy. Coyote has been spotted on the creekside, there may be a possibility of two pups with a den. Fewer kids bike and walk through Lamar, trail won't be much useful. The path will attract homeless people, noise and illegal activities. The proposed midblock crossing at Blaney and E. Estates will create traffic problems. Interested in having a taller fence with a gate. Yes 4/9/19 @ 2:30pm Y Concerned about safety/security/privacy/survival. Blaney mid-block crossing will create more traffic problems, to the existing congestion. Residents think that there will be a wall built on their property side. What type of bridge/height/materials will be used to access Wilson park? The path will attract crime. Maintaining two-way traffic on the creek will be hard. Will the project increases our property tax. How high will be the proposed fencing? Yes 3/26/19 @ 3:30pm Y Concerned about safety and privacy. There used to be a walkway previously, and the city removed it. There were 3 to 4 robberies couple of years ago. Prefers to have a wall or higher fences. Worried that kids will create a mess like hanging out up to light night, smoking pot e.t.c which happens in the summer time. Currently, La Mar has cut- through traffic and speeding issues. Recommends bicycle safety measures at Blaney and E. Estates midblock crossings. Yes N/A Y Opt-out 3/27/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about the proposed bridge alignment. Will it be straight/slant/angled? Won't prefer to be straight as it will disturb the resident's privacy. The existing creek path is narrow. Is the fence considered on the creekside? Why other Alternatives have not been studied. Midblock crossing at Blaney and E. Estates is not a good option. Interested in having a tall fence with a gate. Yes 3/27/19 @ 3:30pm Y Initially opted-out. No issues with privacy as the trail will not pass behind their property. Does not support the project. Midblock crossing at Blaney is not safe, and it will impact the traffic. Prefers to have a fence on the creekside. Is SCWD supporting the project/what is their stand? No Page 4 of 9 09/17/19 55 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 3/26/19 @ 2:30pm Y The existing concrete (slope) ramp falls behind the property. The resident is concerned about the loose soil around the fence. The ground soil is not stable; with the project it may become more unstable. Neighbors also have the same problem. Will the trail have patrolling in the night time. Interested in high fencing. The project will attract homeless people Yes 3/20/19 @ 2:30pm Y Does not support the project at all. When the city council approves the project, will share the concerns about the design. The primary concerns are safety and privacy. Did not provide any direction 4/9/19 @ 3:00pm Y Concerned about safety/privacy/noise/strangers/narrow width of the trail and traffic issues. Alternative 4 should is a good option. Speeding is an issue on Lamar. Lamar will be used, even if the project is built; so we can improve Lamar instead of constructing the trail. Neighbors opinion should be valued. The path will not be much useful for school kids. Blaney Avenue already has traffic issues; proposed mid-block crossing will add more problems. Blaney is also used as a cut-through route. Did not provide any direction 4/3/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about safety/privacy/will attract crime/illegal activities/noise/kids misusing the trail/stone pelting. Is the trail project eligible for Measure B funding? Feels like the community was not informed at the starting phase of the project. Lazano Lane properties will be significantly impacted by the project. It will be unsafe if the trail is not physically locked during the night time, who will be liable if something wrong happens on the path? The community should have been informed when the project was introduced in the bicycle plan. Before awarding the project to the consultant, the city should have reached out to the community. Won't support the project. Did not provide any direction 4/2/19 @ 3:00pm Y Concerned about safety, privacy, and security. The trail will not be a safe route to school project, as it does not meet AASHTO trail guidelines. Midblock crossing at Blaney Ave is not safe. The trail without fencing is not safe for kids. The water flow in the creek is fast, there is a possibility of kids drowning. Do not promote the project as a safe route to school project. It would be good if the 65 percent plans are provided couple weeks before May 21st council meeting for community review. It would be good if there is clear documentation on which guidelines to be followed (Caltrans HDM or AASHTO). The feasibility study is not documented correctly. No 10302 Page 5 of 9 09/17/19 56 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 4/8/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about noise, safety, privacy. The trail will attract illegal activities. Does not support the project. Cost of the project will be very high. The money can be used on other projects like improving the sidewalks etc. Did not provide any direction 3/26/19 @ 3:30pm N 3/21/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about safety, privacy, someone breaking windows, garbage, fireworks, cigarettes , and kids noise. Not interested in having high fences No 3/25/19 @ 2:30pm Y The resident is concerned about safety and privacy, as it was not a pleasant experience when the trail was open last time. If the project comes in, fencing is required as the slopes are steep. If someone falls, there will be a liability issue. Not much concerned as the trail is not so close to the property. Okay with the higher fence. Is the trail closed during nights? Yes 4/1/19 @ 3:00pm N Cancelled: Submitted the following email comments: I just want to state that I am against this creek trail as it violates the privacy of the adjoining houses, will lead to burglary, violence, and unsafe for them to walk along the creek. It is such a peaceful n'hood and I want to let it stay as it is. There are some houses in the path that are literally on the creek and folks can see through the windows. Moreover I am against disrupting the abundance birds, squirrels and other small water creatures like ducks and frogs. PLEASE LEAVE THIS AREA AS IT IS YOU WILL BE DOING MORE TO THE NATURE INSTEAD OF DOING ANY FAVOR TO A FEW CYCLISTS AND OUT OF AREA WALKERS AND JOGGERS WHO HAVE NO INTREST TO THE RESIDENTS WHO HAVE CALLED HOME FOR DECADES. Did not provide any direction Page 6 of 9 09/17/19 57 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 4/12/19 @ 8:10am m Y Opposed to having a trail, but has had discussions with HOA on what screening treatments would be acceptable if a trail moves forward. No consensus could be achieved. Would be helpful if we provided some treatment options they can consider/decide on. Mentioned that existing drainage slopes towards homes -- can this be fixed with trail design? Could we possibly explore bridge to other side and provide a pedestrian path along the southern shoulder to bypass their frontage? Yes, would like us to provide options of proposed treatments (mentioned "glass block" as an option) 4/4/19 @ 2:30pm ------ 4/4/19 @ 2:30pm Combined meeting. Concerns about SCVWD/private property ownership (10' vs. 20') - mentioned had recently communicated with SCVWD staff confirming 10' - wants this settled before moving forward with design. Concerns about safety, noise, pollution, cost ineffectiveness. Feels that trail is being advertised as safe route to school when it is not safe for kids. Does not think this trail is a good selection. Y Did not provide any direction Page 7 of 9 09/17/19 58 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? 3/18/19 @ 3:30pm Y Existing fence height is approx. 5' on property and 6' on creekside, with gate to access creek which owner doesn't currently use. There is an approx 1' grade difference at fence. Trail grade appears to be approx 1' higher than property grade (2' from creekside fence). Owner prefers a tall, solid wooden fence with no gate access. Design may want to consider raising creekside grade at fence to match existing property grades and provide a 6'-7' tall fence with 1' solid lattice extension. Yes 3/27/19 @ 2:30pm Y Concerned about privacy, safety, and noise. Trail grade appears to be higher than the property grade (2'-3' from the creekside fence). Some kids try to use the trail path right now. If the project is built, interested in higher fence and door. Concerned about how the midblock crossing will affect the existing traffic on Blaney Drive. Yes 4/9/19 @ 3:30pm Y Concerned about the impact of the trail crossing on ability to pull safely into and out of her driveway, and had made City Staff back into driveway to experience the issues firsthand. Congestion along Blaney is a potential safety issue for trail users. Concerned about personal safety, with the proximity of the trailhead to property and the potential for bad people to easily access, or vandalize. Concerned about the risk of a fire being started by mischievous trail users. Did not Provide any direction 3/25/19 @ 3:30pm Y Strongly opposes the project. The project keeps on coming back, and it would be good if a make a final decision this time. Concerned about privacy and safety. The trail will attract crime. Is there enough width to construct a Class 1 bicycle path. If lighting is provided in the trail, it will be a disturbance for the neighbors. Concerned about how midblock crossing will affect the Blaney traffic in peak hours and also it will result in pedestrian and bicycles accidents. Does not support the proposed midblock crossing which is very close to the property. Suggests using the project funds for other uses like providing free wifi etc. No 10301 Page 8 of 9 09/17/19 59 of 132 #MEETING DATE/TIME RESIDENT NAME RESIDENT PHONE RESIDENT EMAIL COMPLETE (Y/N) COMMENTS INTERESTED IN TALLER FENCE? Yes - When Beth came to review the 65 percent plans 4/11/19 @ 2:00pm Y Introduction of the project to the community was not good. When will be the Walkshop and Santa Clara Water District meeting minutes will be available. What type of bridge is considered and where will be it located. Don’t cut the trees. Cost of the bridges will be high. What is the procedure for the Noise monitoring study and what will be the environmental clearance - MND/EIR? What will be the setback distance from the fences/property? Alternative 4 was not displayed on the boards in the Walkshop. The project will impact my neighbor's safety/privacy/security. The proposed mid-block on Blaney will create traffic issues and having a median island will be unsafe. How many kids are expected to use the trail? If someone gets injured, they will sue the City/Water District and Owners. Closing the path during the maintenance time will not be easy. The project will significantly impact Lozano Lane properties. Did not Provide any direction 4/11/19 @ 3:30pm Y Who proposed the project. What is the need/motivation of the project? The resident is concerned about noise and privacy. The resident feels that his quality of life will be affected and not happy about the project. The project funds can be used wisely for other top priority projects, like improving Miller/Calle De Barcelone and Calle De Barcelone/Finch Avenue intersections. Why Alternative 4 is not considered. Don't see a severe need for the path. Not interested in a higher fence. No 4/4/19 @ 3:30pm Y biggest concern is the safety of the kids. watches out for them on the street as they walk to/from school and has the greatest visibility of the street from her house. Concerned that if the kids use the trail, will not be able to help them if they become in danger. Thinks the trail is a waste of money and would prefer bike lanes on La Mar. Did not provide any direction 3/26/19 @ 2:00pm Y Concerned about the safety, noise and privacy, as the kitchen will be visible from the path. I am interested in having a higher fence. How long the project will take to finish. Where will be the bridge connecting to Wilison Park? Okay with the project, if taller fencing/vegetation is provided. Currently resident has a wooden gate to access the path and interested in having the gate in the future. Yes Page 9 of 9 09/17/19 60 of 132 STOPSTOP STOPSTOP STOPSTOPSTOPSTOP STOPSTOP zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF TITLE SHEETTS01UUCA: 811EDRDNUORGNULLACECIVRESLAEGIDTSAR OBFEEROYWILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES & USES:THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS REGNART CREEK TRAILPROJECT NO. XXXXXCUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA1 TS01TITLE SHEET2 NT01NOTES AND LEGEND3 DT01TYPICAL SECTIONS4-7 DT02-DT04 DETAILS8-18 IP01-IP11 IMPROVEMENT PLAN19-23 D01-D05 DRAINAGE PLAN24-49 L01-L25 LANDSCAPE PLAN50-56 WCP01-WCP06 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN57 WCP07 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS58-63 S-1-S-6 STRUCTURAL PLANSHEET INDEXSHEET NO. TITLE DRAWINGHORIZONTAL CONTROLPROJECT BENCHMARKELEV DATUM: SCVWD BM237, ELEV=238.46' (NAVD88). DATE ADJUSTED MARCH 14, 2017, SCVWD 6.5CM DIAMETERBRASS DISK; IN UPSTREAM LEFT WING WALL (LOOKING U/S), ANTOINETTE DR @ REGNART CREEK.SET 1980. CITY OF CUPERTINO.SITE MAPLOCATION MAP© 2010 NAVTEQ © AND © 2017 Microsoft Corporation PROJECT LOCATIONDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SIGNATUREDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKSTIMM BORDENAPPROVED BY:RCE 45512DATEREGNART CREEK TRAIL / 65% SUBMITTAL / APRIL 26, 2019 S BLANEY AVE E E S T A T E S D R LA MAR DRSCALE: 1"=200'PACIFICA DRSOMERSET DRLAS ONDAS WAYCPNORTHINGEASTINGDESCRIPTION300 1941208.45 6116988.34 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB301 1941195.65 6117380.71 SET CUT X ON WALK302 1942372.24 6117476.84 SET GEAR SPIKE303 1942341.65 6117311.91 SET CUT X ON WALK304 1942355.63 6118017.11 SET MAG NAIL305 1942348.97 6118304.96 SET MAG NAIL306 1942278.73 6118768.65 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB307 1942101.10 6118767.67 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB308 1941878.58 6118764.61 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB309 1941988.26 6119527.41 SET HUB & TACK310 1942063.48 6119822.01 SET MAG NAIL311 1941941.93 6120604.37 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB312 1941747.52 6120557.50 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB313 1941573.54 6120546.74 SET CUT X ON TOP OF CURB314 1941747.92 6117395.15 SET GEAR SPIKE315 1942274.77 6117401.99 SET GEAR SPIKE316 1942362.79 6117761.07 SET GEAR SPIKE317 1942325.31 6118453.77 SET GEAR SPIKE318 1942136.92 6118624.77 SET GEAR SPIKE319 1942005.38 6119088.38 SET GEAR SPIKE320 1941932.00 6119448.22 SET GEAR SPIKE321 1941850.64 6119898.69 SET GEAR SPIKE322 1941777.74 6120302.30 SET GEAR SPIKE FARALLONE DR 1ST.1955E Attachment C09/17/19 61 of 132 zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF NOTES AND LEGENDNT01CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL NOTESABBREVIATIONS@ATAC ASPHALTIC CONCRETEAD ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCEANG PT ANGLE POINTARV AIR RELEASE VALVEBC BEGIN CURVEBOA BLOW OFF ASSEMBLYBOW BACK OF WALKBEG BEGINBVC BEGIN VERTICAL CURVEBW BOTTOM OF WALLCL/C CENTER LINECoC CITY OF CUPERTINODIP DUCTILE IRON PIPEDW DRIVEWAYEC END CURVEEG EXISTING GRADEELEC ELECTRICEL/ELEV ELEVATIONEP EDGE OF PAVEMENTER END OF RETURNESA ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAESMT EASEMENTEVC END VERTICAL CURVEEX/(E) EXISTINGFG FINISHED GRADEFH FIRE HYDRANTFL FLOW LINEFOC/FC FACE OF CURBGA GAUGEGB GRADE BREAKHDS HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATORHP HIGH POINTINV INVERTIRR IRRIGATIONJT JOINT TRENCHLP LOW POINTLT, RT LEFT, RIGHTMUTCD CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICESNTS NOT TO SCALEPCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATUREP / PL PROPERTY LINEPG PROFILE GRADEPLE PRIVATE LANDSCAPE EASEMENTPOC POINT ON CURVEPRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVEPSDE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENTPSE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTPUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTPVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTIONPVMT PAVEMENTRAD/R RADIUS(R) REMOVERL RAILINGRCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPER/W RIGHT OF WAYRRFB RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONSSLOPESD STORM DRAINSDCB STORM DRAIN CATCH BASINSDCI STORM DRAIN CURB INLETSDFI STORM DRAIN FIELD INLETSDJB STORM DRAIN JUNCTION BOXSDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLESDRE STORM DRAIN RELEASE EASEMENTSL STREET LIGHTSS SANITARY SEWERSSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTSSFI SANITARY SEWER FLUSHING INLETSSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLESTA STATIONSTD STANDARDS/W SIDEWALKTBD TO BE DETERMINEDTBV TO BE VERIFIEDTC TOP OF CURBTDC TOP OF DEPRESSED CURBTOB TOP OF BANKTR TRAILTVC TOP OF VERTICAL CURBTW TOP OF WALLTYP TYPICALVC VERTICAL CURVEVCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPEW WATERWM WATER METERWV WATER VALVELEGENDWATER MAINWATER SERVICE AND METERWATER VALVEELECTROLIERCONDUITPROJECT BOUNDARYCURB AND GUTTERSTREET MONUMENTEASEMENTSANITARY SEWERSANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CENTERLINEPROPERTY LINESIDEWALKSTORM DRAIN LINERIGHT OF WAYFIRE HYDRANTSTREEPROPOSEDEXISTINGSTORM DRAIN MANHOLE PULL BOXSTREET SIGNDIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGESANITARY LATERALSANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUTSTORM DRAIN CURB INLETTHROUGH CURB DRAINBLOW OFFENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAPAVED TRAILJOINT TRENCHGASOVERHEADSTORM DRAIN FIELD INLET (1X1)STORM DRAIN LARGE CURB INLETSTORM DRAIN FIELD INLET (2X2)OVERLAND RELEASE PATHSAWCUT LINEWWBACK FLOW VALVEFIRE SERVICE CONNECTIONUTILITY POLEOHDETAIL CALLOUTDETAILSHEET NUMBERA3CONCRETEASPHALT PAVEMENTDECOMPOSED GRANITETOE OF CREEK1. All work shall be in accordance with the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (latest edition, as amended), and Standard Plans(latest edition, as amended), and City of Cupertino Standard Details unless otherwise indicated. The Contractor shall perform the work described in the specification,and as shown on the drawings, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.2. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure the approved plans or the latest revised plans are furnished to its subcontractors and to ensure the latestapproved plans are onsite at all times during construction.3. The Contractor shall notify the City Inspector two (2) working days prior to requiring an inspection. Call (650) 333-0831 to schedule Public Works inspections.4. Construction area traffic control devices shall be installed prior to beginning of work.5. The Contractor shall locate underground facilities in the area of work. The Contractor shall contact Underground Service Alert (USA) at 811 two (2) working days inadvance of any work for location of the underground facilities.6. All underground utilities shall be installed and backfilled before placement of the base material and surface structures.7. All water lines, valves, hydrants, and appurtenances thereto installed within the public right-of-way shall be the property of the water utility company.8. Storm drain lines installed as part of the work on these plans shall be cleared of all debris and obstructions prior to final acceptance.9. All trench backfill, fill areas, and base material shall attain a minimum relative compaction consistent with the requirements of existing street Trench Restoration Detail.For typical trench sections, except for sanitary sewers, refer to the City Standard Details or Trench Restoration Detail.10. Foreign matter in existing or proposed right-of-way shall be removed to a depth of two (2) feet below subgrade and disposed of per Caltrans Standards. In the case oflive tree roots from trees, Contractor shall contact the City for field observation and determination of removal.11. Trench plates in the traveled way shall be traffic rated, properly secured and shall be recessed.12. All trenches located within 5' of the edge of pavement (ie. curb, lip of gutter, edge of pavement, etc.) shall be repaved to the edge of pavement.13.All new pavement shall at a minimum, match the existing pavement section. A minimum pavement section of 3” AC/6” Class 2 AB is required.14. Existing pavement that is removed or damaged shall be replaced as required by the City Engineer.15. Manhole frames and covers shall be brought to finish grade prior to final acceptance.16. Five (5) working days prior to installing permanent striping, the Contractor shall cat track the striping and request review of the cat tracks by the City Traffic Engineer.The City Engineer shall have the right to make changes in the location of the alignment of traffic stripes, pavement markings, and pavement markers.17. Concrete for use in all concrete structures shall conform to California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications Section 90. Drop inlets, sidewalks, curbsand gutters shall contain 590 lbs. of cement per cubic yard and shall attain a minimum strength of 3,000 psi in 28 days.18. Drop inlets shall be constructed conforming to City Standard Details unless otherwise noted on the plans. Drop Inlets shall be installed concurrent with the constructionof the curb and gutter “No Dumping Flows to the Bay.” plaque, furnished by the City, shall be installed on the curb adjacent to all inlets or grates.19. A minimum thickness of five (5) inches of concrete shall be required for commercial driveway approaches and four (4) inches for residential. The driveway approachshall be installed concurrent with the construction of the curb and gutter.20. One pound of dispersing black shall be mixed with each cubic yard of concrete at the batch plant.21. New City standard street monuments and other permanent monuments disturbed during construction shall be replaced before acceptance of the improvements by theCity Engineer. Attention is directed to Section 8771 of the California Business and Professions Code for the requirements concerning survey monuments. Existingsurvey monuments shall be located and referenced by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer prior to construction operations anda corner record or record of survey shall be filed with the County Surveyor of the County of Santa Clara. Existing survey monuments shall be reset to finish grade and acorner record or record of survey shall be filed with the County Surveyor of the County of Santa Clara prior to the recording of the certificate of completion for theproject.22. Construction survey stakes or marks (control stakes) to establish lines and grades shall be set by the Contractor's surveyor or engineer.23. Notify the City Inspector two (2) working days in advance of requiring services for checking field staking. Three (3) copies of the cut sheets shall be furnished to the CityInspector.24. Contractor is responsible for dust control and ensuring the area adjacent to the work is left in a clean condition daily.25. Contractor shall review City Detail 6-4 on tree protection prior to accomplishing any work or removing any trees and implement accordingly.26. Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for ANY activity which disturbs the soil.27. Driveway conforms shall consist of 4" PCC on 4" Class 2 AB.28. Contractor shall be responsible to ensure compliance with American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) for all affected pavement and sidewalk features.29. Adjustment of utility boxes shall be performed in accordance with the specifications and requirements of the utility owner. Contractor shall coordinate with applicableutility companies for inspection requirements including PG&E, AT&T, SJWC, and CSD.30. Contractor shall trim existing trees as necessary to maintain 8' clearance above proposed sidewalks and as necessary for construction.31. Contractor shall install top soil to a depth of 8" below FG in all constructed parkstrips and areas of curb, gutter and sidewalk removal where hardscape is not replaced.Top soil shall be installed flush with back of curb, front of sidewalk, and existing utility boxes.32. Relocation of mailboxes shall be performed to the satisfaction of the engineer and to USPS standards and in a method allowing resuse of the existing mailbox whenpossible. Contractor is responsible for furnishing replacement mailboxes. Mailbox door shall be placed 6" - 8" from face of curb and 41" - 45" above road face.Contractor to coordinate work with USPS prior to disturbing mailbox.33. Fence removal shall remove fence panels to the nearest post beyond limit of work. Contractor shall protect existing fence posts and panels to remain and shall beresponsible for replacing any fence portions which are damaged by construction activities or which are unable to be relocated due to existing condition.34. Contractor shall replace and/or restore any onsite private facilities, including but not limited to irrigation and electrical systems affected by the project, to the satisfactionof the engineer. Contractor shall restore, to the satisfaction of the engineer, any areas within temporary construction easements or otherwise affected by the contractoras a result of the project. This shall include vegetated or landscaped areas on private properties fronting the project.35. Contractor shall make reasonably available to the respective property owner salvageable frontage improvements, including, but not limited to pavers, boulders, lightfixtures, irrigation heads, fence panels, fence posts and other appurtenances which are in conflict with the ultimate project improvements.36. Top of curb elevations at driveways and other depressed areas represent theoretical full height curb elevation. Depressed curb sections at driveways shall beconstructed 0.45' below elevation shown per City standard detail.209/17/19 62 of 132 TOP OF BANK10.33' OGFC0.17' ATPB0.33' CLASS 2 AB10.33' DG0.17' ATPB0.33' CLASS 2 AB20.33' HMA (TYPE A)0.66' CLASS 2 AB3COLD PLANE 0.15' AC PAVEMENT0.15' HMA (TYPE A)41.00' HMA (TYPE A)560.33' HMA (TYPE A)0.5' CLASS 2 AB70.33' DG0.5' CLASS 2 AB2%EXISTING CHAIN LINK/WOOD FENCE1PERFORATED HDPE PIPEWOOD PRIVACY FENCE (TYPE B)ALUMINUM HEADERREMOVABLE RAILINGRAILINGRAISED CERAMIC CHANNEL MARKERRETAINING CURB6" DASHED YELLOW THERMOPLASTIC STRIPE4" WHITE SHOULDER STRIPE2346731352%2%2343776333EXISTING TREEEXISTING TREE8'1'1'10'2'2'1' &VARIES1' &VARIES7748'2'2'2' &VARIES0.5'7758'2'2'0.5'±2'66410'3'3'0.5'33EXISTING TREEEXISTINGRETAININGWALLEXISTINGRETAININGWALLEXISTINGRETAININGWALLEXISTING TREE53353865TOP OF BANK12%EXISTING CHAIN LINK/WOOD FENCE12348'2'2'0.5'&VARIES3TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"L" 0+18.3 TO 4+11.0TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R1" 27+33.2 TO 28+64.3TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R1" 10+51.4 TO 27+33.2TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R1" 28+64.3 TO 29+78.9TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R1" 29+78.9 TO 30+93.3TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R2" 50+28.9 TO 51+36.7"R2" 68+17.5 TO 68+28.998882%2%888EXISTINGPAVEMENTSECTIONEXISTINGPAVEMENTSECTIONEXISTINGPAVEMENTSECTION992' &VARIES223zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF CONSTRUCTION DETAILSDT01REGNARK CREEK TRAIL / 65% SUBMITTAL / APRIL 26, 20193 09/17/19 63 of 132 TOP OF BANK12%EXISTING CHAIN LINK/WOOD FENCE12348'2'2'0.5'&VARIES7TOP OF BANK12%12348'2'2'0.5'&VARIES22%76338'2'2'7332%763310'2'2'7332%76338'2'2'773TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R2" 51+36.7 TO 52+74.8"R2" 63+95.1 TO 68+17.6TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"R2" 52+74.8 TO 56+30.7"R2" 60+36.9 YO 63+95.1TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"W" 400+00.0 TO 400+70.5TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"W" 400+70.5 TO 401+38.6TYPICAL CROSS SECTION"W" 401+38.6 TO 404+02.3888882332zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF DT02REGNARK CREEK TRAIL / 65% SUBMITTAL / APRIL 26, 2019CONSTRUCTION DETAILS409/17/19 64 of 132 zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF DT03REGNARK CREEK TRAIL / 65% SUBMITTAL / APRIL 26, 2019CONSTRUCTION DETAILS509/17/19 65 of 132 1' MINGATE OPENING 12', 20' (AS SPECIFIED)NOTES:12' MINTOP OF BANK/OGTRAIL/FG REMOVABLE RAILING(SEE DETAIL LEFT)3" MIN2%STEEL SLEEVEEXISTING CHAINLINK/WOOD FENCE3.5'9'1. THE FENCING SHALL BE #9 GAGE FENCE FABRIC, STANDARD 2-INCH CHAIN LINK DIAMOND MESH.2. INSTALL LOCKING ROD RECEIVER FLUSH WITH FG IN FULLY OPENPOSITION.REMOVABLE SPLIT RAILING DETAILNTS3.5'2"X4" CAP1"X8" BOARDS WITH 1"OVERLAP2"X4" STRINGERCONCRETE FOOTING1.25'NTSCHAIN LINK GATE DETAILNTS6'2.5' MIN1' MIN8'7'3.5'6'X6' PRESSURETREATED POST @ 8'O.C. MAXIMUM1"X8" BOARDS WITH 1"OVERLAP2"X12" KICKER BOARDCLASS 2 AB2"X4" STRINGER1.25'WOOD PRIVACY FENCE (TYPE A) DETAILNTS8'7'3.5'2"X4" CAP6'X6' PRESSURETREATED POST @ 8'O.C. MAXIMUM1"X8" BOARDS WITH 1"OVERLAP CLASS 2 AB2"X4" STRINGERCONCRETE FOOTING1.25'WOOD PRIVACY FENCE (TYPE B) DETAILNTS4"8"TYP4"6"CONCRETEFOOTINGBOTTOM HINGESTRAIGHT PLUGSTRETCHER BARHOOK BOLTSDOUBLE GATEFORK LATCHTRUSS RODSCORNER ELBOWTOP HINGETENSION WIRE END CLAMP0.5'0.5'4'8'1DT042DT043DT044DT042"x6" WOODRAILS (TYP)TUBULAR STEELPOST, 3" SQ., 12GAUGE (TYP)STEEL SLEEVE, 3.5" SQ.,11 GAUGE (TYP)1/4" WELDED PIN(TYP)EGGROUT (TYP)EG/FGEG/FGEG/FG OFTRAILEG/FG OF PRIVATEPROPERTYCENTERLINE STRIPE DETAILNTS5DT043'TYP9'TYP4" YELLOWTHERMOPLASTICSTRIPE4"X3" L-SHAPEDALUMINUM EDGINGGEOGRID APRON3/8" x 10" SPIRAL STEEL SPIKE AT 12" O.C.DECOMPOSED GRANITE(DG) 4" THICKOPEN GRADED FRICTIONCOURSE (OGFC) 4" THICKASPHALT TREATED PERMEABLEPAVEMENT BASE (ATPB) 2" THICKNATIVE GRADE OR CERTIFIEDCOMPACTED SUBGRADECALTRANS CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE,MIN 4" THICK, INCREASE DEPTH WITH SLOPEOF UNDERDRAIN. MAINTAIN 2" MIN AB ON ALLSIDES OF UNDERDRAIN.6" HDPE PERFORATED UNDERDRAINPIPE WITH PERFORATIONS DOWN.SEE PLAN FOR SLOPEIMPERMEABLE LINER ON BOTTOM ANDSIDES OF AGGREGATE BASE, 30 MIL PVCPOROUS ASPHALT SECTION DETAILNTS6TYPzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF DT04REGNARK CREEK TRAIL / 65% SUBMITTAL / APRIL 26, 2019CONSTRUCTION DETAILS609/17/19 66 of 132 10' MAX7'CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAILNTS1' MIN2.5' MIN1' MIN9 GAUGE ALUMINUMFABRIC2.875" O.D. GALV.CORNER OR TERMINALPOST1.66" O.D. GALV.BOTTOM RAIL1.66" O.D. GALV.TOP RAIL4.5" DIAMETERPOLYETHYLENEFENCE CAPS(OPTIONAL)2.875" O.D. GALV.CORNER OR TERMINALPOSTCONCRETE FOOTING9 GAUGE TIEWIRES @ 12" O.C.RAISED CERAMIC CHANNEL MARKERSNTS8" TYP2.75" TYP1"TYPEXISTING ACRAISED CROSSWALK DETAILNTS; VERTICALLY EXAGGERATED VARIABLE DEPTHAC OVERLAYR=1" (TYP)EG0.15' COLD PLANEEXISTING ACRETAINING CURB DETAILNTSEGFG12"12"6.75"6"4"4"8"TYP 8'3.5'1'3.5'2"x6" WOODRAILS (TYP)CONCRETEFOOTINGEGEXISTINGRETAININGWALLEXISTING TREE6"TRAIL/FG REMOVABLE RAILING(SEE DETAIL LEFT)CONCRETE FOOTINGSPLIT RAILING (TYPE A) DETAILNTS1DT052DT053DT054DT055DT05EG/FG#4 REBAR @ 12" O.C.HMA (TYPE)TCAFFIX PERMANUFACTURERSRECOMMENDATIONRECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) DETAIL NTS6DT05TUBULAR STEELPOST, 3" SQ., 12GAUGE (TYP)zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF DT05REGNARK CREEK TRAIL / 65% SUBMITTAL / APRIL 26, 2019CONSTRUCTION DETAILS709/17/19 67 of 132 0+001+002+003+004+004+1710+00 11+00"L" LINE"L" LINEL1L2C1C2C3LINE TABLELINEL1L2L3L4LENGTH57.95'38.37'79.53'99.24'BEARINGS79°43'28"ES85°34'03"EN00°33'03"EN00°49'30"EBEGIN NORTHING1941280.851941210.871941168.651941248.18BEGIN EASTING6116967.296117337.796117386.176117386.94END NORTHING1941270.511941207.911941248.181941347.41END EASTING6117024.316117376.056117386.946117388.37CURVE TABLECURVEC1C2C3LENGTH29.62'146.69'143.95'RADIUS205.00'480.02'532.89'DELTA8°16'43"17°30'30"15°28'38"L3L4"R1" LINE 1044110425TOBR/WR/W R/W R/WESA1DT042DT04 2DT0471'8'1'672'10'2'121' 8' 1'2FG 235.400+47.50 ~ GBFG 234.561+38.53 ~ GBFG 234.531+62.60 ~ GB FG 232.42 3+37.43 ~ GB FG 232.57 3+86.34 ~ GB FG 231.82 4+11.67 ~ GB FG 233.92 2+02.84 ~ GB FG 233.37 2+58.45 ~ GB FG 234.851+17.05 ~ GBFG 235.610+86.92 ~ GB FG 232.09 10+56.56 ~ GB FG 232.73 11+19.02 ~ GB FG 233.25 11+47.18 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP02IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILEIP01PACIFICA DRTORRE AVEL PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V1+001+500+502+503+002+004+003+5023023524010+0010+5011+0011+50225230235R1 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' VMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP02 FOR TRAILHEAD DETAILS,SEE SHEET L1.1FOR TRAILHEAD DETAILS,SEE SHEET L1.2PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'809/17/19 68 of 132 12+0013+0014+0015+0016+00L5L6L4"R1" LINELINE TABLELINEL4L5L6LENGTH99.24'182.01'267.97'BEARINGN00°49'30"EN00°47'17"EN00°51'39"EBEGIN NORTHING1941248.181941347.411941529.40BEGIN EASTING6117386.946117388.376117390.87END NORTHING1941347.411941529.401941797.34END EASTING6117388.376117390.876117394.90103951038510375103651035510345TOBR/WREGNART CREEKR/WR/WR/WESA1DT042'10'2' 2'10'2'122FG 232.8212+12.05 ~ GB FG 233.24 13+60.28 ~ GB FG 232.66 14+19.12 ~ GB FG 232.56 14+73.72 ~ GB FG 231.84 15+59.67 ~ GB FG 231.57 15+85.65 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP01 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP03 IP0211+5012+0012+5013+00225230235R1 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' VMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP01 24013+5014+0014+5015+0015+5016+00MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP03225230235 240PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE909/17/19 69 of 132 16+0017+0018+0019+0020+0021+00L7L8L9L10L11C4C5C6C7LINE TABLELINEL6L7L8L9L10L11LENGTH267.97'126.83'35.07'78.62'134.57'47.13'BEARINGN00°51'39"EN01°35'58"EN00°50'47"EN02°55'46"EN01°03'45"EN03°35'52"EBEGIN NORTHING1941529.401941797.341941926.741941969.081942054.111942197.50BEGIN EASTING6117390.876117394.906117398.496117399.256117403.496117406.35END NORTHING1941797.341941924.111941961.811942047.601942188.661942244.54END EASTING6117394.906117398.446117399.016117403.276117405.996117409.31CURVE TABLECURVEC4C5C6C7C8LENGTH2.63'7.27'6.52'8.85'157.96'RADIUS200.00'200.00'200.00'200.00'127.00'DELTA0°45'11"2°04'59"1°52'01"2°32'07"71°15'45"L6C8"R1" LINE1033510325103051029510285102751026510265TOBREGNART CREEKR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WESA1DT042'10'2' 2'10'2'122'10'2'2FG 230.5216+39.26 ~ GBFG 229.3716+94.98 ~ GB FG 224.75 19+62.32 ~ GB FG 224.53 20+24.73 ~ GB FG 224.32 20+82.57 ~ GB FG 228.08 17+35.40 ~ GB FG 226.97 17+80.76 ~ GB FG 226.35 18+31.11 ~ GB FG 225.96 18+41.96 ~ GB FG 225.86 18+52.51 ~ GB FG 225.30 18+83.00 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP02 IP03MAT C H L I N E - S E E S H E E T I P 0 416+0016+5017+0017+50225R1 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' VMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP02 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP0418+0018+5019+0019+5020+0020+5021+00230235220225230235220FOR TRAILHEADDETAILS,SEE SHEET L1.3PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE1009/17/19 70 of 132 21+00 22+0023+0024+0025+0026+00L12L13L14L15L16L17L18C8C9C10C11C12C13C8LINE TABLELINEL12L13L14L15L16L17L18LENGTH11.92'76.29'78.35'75.50'37.33'14.38'93.41'BEARINGN74°51'38"ES87°58'23"ES88°04'10"EN89°17'07"ES89°22'09"ES87°29'37"EN89°58'26"EBEGIN NORTHING1942359.161942367.451942364.751942362.021942362.961942362.371942361.55BEGIN EASTING6117502.896117559.476117635.716117723.256117803.446117847.316117870.52END NORTHING1942362.271942364.751942362.111942362.961942362.551942361.741942361.59END EASTING6117514.396117635.716117714.026117798.756117840.776117861.686117963.93CURVE TABLECURVEC8C9C10C11C12C13LENGTH157.96'45.54'9.23'4.70'6.55'8.84'RADIUS127.00'152.00'200.00'200.00'200.00'200.00'DELTA71°15'45"17°09'59"2°38'43"1°20'44"1°52'32"2°31'57""R1" LINE20217201972018720177201672015720147202322022220202201922018210265TOBREGNART CREEKR/W R/W R/WR/WR/W23+15.03 39.48' R 23+86.77 38.09' R ESA26+06.95 20.52' L3DT041DT04 1DT043DT042DT04212'10'2'2'10'2'2122FG 223.8121+01.47 ~ GBFG 223.8921+42.73 ~ GBFG 223.5322+12.08 ~ GB FG 219.98 26+18.85 ~ GB FG 220.16 25+68.96 ~ GB FG 220.39 25+76.07 ~ GB FG 221.58 23+88.76 ~ GB FG 221.53 24+71.80 ~ GB FG 223.3621+74.18 ~ GBFG 223.3021+95.10 ~ GBFG 223.4122+38.55 ~ GBFG 223.0622+52.61 ~ GB FG 222.34 23+17.35 ~ GB FG 222.66 22+85.19 ~ GB FG 222.64 22+99.38 ~ GB FG 222.33 23+38.84 ~ GB FG 222.25 23+46.53 ~ GB FG 219.89 26+60.18 ~ GB FG 219.67 26+88.00 ~ GB FG 220.38 25+45.36 ~ GB FG 221.12 25+12.30 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP03IP04MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP05 RODRIGUES AVER1 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V21+5022+0021+0023+0023+5022+5024+5024+0022022521525+5025+0026+5026+0027+00220225215MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP03 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP05 FOR TRAILHEADDETAILS,SEE SHEET L1.4PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE1109/17/19 71 of 132 CURVE TABLECURVEC14C15C16C17C18C19LENGTH7.16'6.85'19.41'17.58'6.86'98.73'RADIUS20.00'20.00'160.71'236.04'20.00'220.00'DELTA20°30'03"19°37'21"6°55'15"4°16'02"19°39'52"25°42'50"27+0028+0029+0030+0031+0032+0033+00L19L20L21L22L23L24L25L26L27L28L29C14C15C16C17C18C19L29LINE TABLELINEL19L20L21L22L23L24L25L26L27L28L29LENGTH15.06'8.53'127.31'20.02'57.75'40.01'95.00'7.13'54.64'24.36'71.08'BEARINGS69°31'31"ES89°08'52"ES89°08'52"ES86°17'07"ES89°08'52"EN89°25'12"ES89°08'52"ES82°49'32"ES79°13'41"ES59°33'49"ES33°50'59"EBEGIN NORTHING1942360.331942353.801942353.671942351.781942350.481942349.621942350.031942347.181942343.651942331.031942251.55BEGIN EASTING6117970.936117991.746118000.276118127.576118147.556118205.306118245.316118359.646118384.106118444.176118536.44END NORTHING1942355.061942353.671942351.781942350.481942349.621942350.031942348.621942346.291942333.441942318.691942192.52END EASTING6117985.046118000.276118127.576118147.556118205.306118245.316118340.306118366.726118437.776118465.176118576.03"R1" LINE20137201232010920095200832007110358103681037810388200452003520025200302002010275200852005520147201821030220020TOBREGNART CREEKR/WR/WR/WR/WESAR/WPROTECT EX POLE ANDGUY IN PLACE27+34.18 26.90' L3DT041DT045DT05 2DT042DT0531+21.78 13.76' L 29+85.81 13.00' LPLANTER (TYP),SEE SHEET L25FOR POTTERY LEGEND27+21.85 2.53' R 5DT0531+00.47 2.20' R 1DT0512" WHITE STRIPE@ 4' O.C.2'10'2' 10'2'8'2'452'8'2' 3'772'8'1' 2'122'8'2'2FG 216.5727+97.63 ~ GBFG 216.4128+29.00 ~ GBFG 215.7528+64.39 ~ GB FG 215.15 29+64.59 ~ GB FG 213.23 30+72.56 ~ GB FG 216.33 32+32.72 ~ GB FG 216.08 32+74.13 ~ GB FG 216.23 33+02.66 ~ GB FG 216.24 33+27.27 ~ GB FG 216.16 33+48.67 ~ GB FG 213.62 30+93.30 ~ GB FG 216.70 31+78.42 ~ GB FG 215.46 31+30.11 ~ GB FG 216.41 31+53.46 ~ GB FG 216.5927+60.45 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH L INE - SEE SHEET IP06IP05 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP04 DE PALMA LNR1 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V27+5028+0027+0029+0029+5028+5030+5030+0021522021031+5031+0032+5032+00MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP04 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP0633+0033+50215220210PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE1209/17/19 72 of 132 STOP34+0035+00L29L30L31C20C21L29"R1" LINELINE TABLELINEL29L30L31LENGTH71.08'10.37'61.69'BEARINGS33°50'59"ES75°05'11"ES44°07'19"EBEGIN NORTHING1942251.551942118.851942107.53BEGIN EASTING6118536.446118679.196118703.95END NORTHING1942192.521942116.181942063.25END EASTING6118576.036118689.226118746.90CURVE TABLECURVEC20C21LENGTH129.55'17.29'RADIUS180.00'32.00'DELTA41°14'12"30°57'52"103081027510265103012002010275R/WTOBREGNART CREEKR/WR/WESA1DT042'8'2'2'8'2'122'8'2'2STOP 51+0052+0053+00L34LINE TABLELINEL34LENGTH1855.12'BEARINGS79°47'52"EBEGIN NORTHING1942067.61BEGIN EASTING6118746.96END NORTHING1941739.02END EASTING6120572.75"R2" LINE199911997110280102851029519991REGNART CREEKR/WR/WR/W1999152+74.92 12.30' R 50+52.83 0.40' L 1DT044DT054DT042'8'2'122'8'2'122'8'2'22FG 216.1833+70.79 ~ GBFG 215.5334+24.34 ~ GBFG 215.5634+41.69 ~ GBFG 215.4434+65.39 ~ GB FG 215.39 35+50.78 ~ GB FG 215.7335+18.29 ~ GB FG 215.72 50+29.74 ~ GB FG 216.22 50+52.34 ~ GB FG 215.84 50+80.64 ~ GB FG 215.50 51+19.32 ~ GB FG 215.49 51+58.48 ~ GB FG 215.21 52+14.29 ~ GB FG 214.91 52+54.31 ~ GB FG 214.96 52+96.10 ~ GB FG 214.92 53+33.81 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP05 IP06MATCH L I N E - S E E S H E E T I P 0 7R1 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V34+0034+5033+5035+5035+00220215MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP05210 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP10 51+0051+5050+5052+5053+0052+0053+50MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP07R2 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V220215210PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' S. BLANEY AVENUE MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP10 IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE1309/17/19 73 of 132 211111333333222LINE TABLELINEL35L36L37LENGTH77.26'77.95'7.82'BEARINGS80°43'22"ES86°05'45"ES10°25'24"WBEGIN NORTHING1941996.761941994.711941937.53BEGIN EASTING6119399.916119580.506119769.33END NORTHING1941984.301941989.401941929.83END EASTING6119476.166119658.286119767.9154+0055+0056+0057+0058+0059+0060+00400+00401+00402+00403+00L34LINE TABLELINEL34LENGTH1855.12'BEARINGS79°47'52"EBEGIN NORTHING1942067.61BEGIN EASTING6118746.96END NORTHING1941739.02END EASTING6120572.75L34L35L36C22C23C24CURVE TABLECURVEC22C23C24C25LENGTH61.36'44.35'100.50'33.08'RADIUS133.74'113.00'278.06'25.00'DELTA26°17'17"22°29'09"20°42'31"75°48'37""R2" LINE"W" LINECL B R I D G E1992519913199011988519867 19851198411983119821TOBREGNART CREEKR/WR/WR/W56+05.79 0.18' L 56+31.08 0.86' L 56+20.92 39.33' L 56+54.63 39.47' L1DT04 1DT051DT0457+75.13 41.24' L 56+71.28 39.68' L 57+28.08 54.10' L 56+75.93 53.26' L 56+49.75 1.14' L 56+94.92 12.17' R R/W2DT042DT041DT06R/WR/W4DT041DT041DT044DT054DT0457+64.89 12.02' R 58+34.90 11.70' R 59+04.92 12.11' R 4DT042'8'2'1212'6772'8'2' 2'10'2'2FG 214.5254+15.56 ~ GBFG 214.4155+00.40 ~ GBFG 214.1455+40.36 ~ GB FG 214.40 55+77.73 ~ GB FG 214.18 55+99.27 ~ GB FG 215.59 56+30.50 ~ GB FG 215.60 56+49.17 ~ GB FG 213.95 56+61.96 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP06 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP08IP0754+0053+5021522021055+0054+5056+0055+50MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP06 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP08215 220210R2 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V57+0058+0057+5059+0058+5056+5059+50PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' 200200FOR TRAILHEADDETAILS,SEE SHEET L1.6FOR "W" LINE ALIGNAND PROFILE, SEESHEET IP0960+00IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILEBASEBALLDIAMONDWORK NOT SHOWN14FOR BRIDGE DETAILS,SEE SHEETSS-1,S-3,S-509/17/19 74 of 132 60+0061+0062+0063+0064+0065+0066+00404+02404+00L34 LINE TABLELINEL34LENGTH1855.12'BEARINGS79°47'52"EBEGIN NORTHING1942067.61BEGIN EASTING6118746.96END NORTHING1941739.02END EASTING6120572.75L37C25"R2" LINE"W" LINECL BRIDGE19787 19773197591973119717197031975619736197181970219811198011974519766TOBREGNART CREEKR/WR/W60+00.94 43.94' L60+20.94 43.96' L60+37.48 43.79' L60+57.48 43.80' L1DT04 62+46.86 43.00' L 63+59.86 43.03' L4DT04 1DT0463+94.92 11.96' R 1DT04R/WR/W1DT041DT043DT044DT0512'2'10'2'122'8'2'7672'8'2'2FG 212.7260+08.54 ~ GBFG 214.3260+21.03 ~ GBFG 214.3260+37.03 ~ GBFG 212.4760+78.16 ~ GB FG 212.10 62+53.05 ~ GB FG 211.88 64+80.70 ~ GB FG 212.10 65+92.08 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP07 IP08MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP0960+0021521061+0060+5062+0061+50MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP07 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP09 215210R2 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V20062+5063+5063+0064+5064+0065+0066+0065+50200PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE15FOR BRIDGE DETAILS,SEE SHEETSS-2,S-4,S-509/17/19 75 of 132 STOP66+0067+0068+00L34LINE TABLELINEL34LENGTH1855.12'BEARINGS79°47'52"EBEGIN NORTHING1942067.61BEGIN EASTING6118746.96END NORTHING1941739.02END EASTING6120572.75"R2" LINE1968819674196891967519661TOB19660R/WR/W66+77.17 11.66' R R1-1 REGNART CREEKR/WR/W4DT054DT0467+44.94 11.49' R4DT05 1DT042'8'2'122FG 213.4366+94.99 ~ GBFG 213.7667+74.62 ~ GB FG 213.16 68+09.63 ~ GB FG 212.19 68+29.00 ~ GB FG 215.60 400+00.00 ~ GB FG 212.32 400+72.77 ~ GB FG 213.14 401+30.45 ~ GB FG 213.99 401+87.12 ~ GB FG 210.12 403+08.98 ~ GB FG 210.81 402+57.67 ~ GB FG 214.32 404+02.29 ~ GB zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF IP09MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP0866+5066+0021522021067+5067+0068+00MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP08 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP11R2 PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' VPLANSCALE: 1" = 20'W PROFILESCALE: 1" = 20' H; 1" = 5' V215220210210215205210215205400+50400+00401+50401+00402+00403+00402+50403+50404+00IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILE1609/17/19 76 of 132 STOPSTOPSTOPLINE TABLELINEL38LENGTH539.02'BEARINGN00°51'04"EBEGIN NORTHING1941856.58BEGIN EASTING6118743.83END NORTHING1942395.53END EASTING6118751.843 5 + 9 3200+00201+00202+00203+00204+00205+00205+3950+00 L31C21L38"B" LINE"R2" LINE"B" LINE 202+06.69 = "R1" LINE 35+93"B" LINE 202+11.05 = "R2" LINE 50+0019991R1-139392222393939A393912"WHITEMARKING39AMARKINGMARKINGMARKING12"WHITER1-1MARKING6'3'11'11'3'6'EX SIGN POSTPROTECT IN PLACECoC STD S/WCoC STD CURB AND GUTTER(A2-6)CALTRANS CASE ACURB RAMPCoC STD S/WCALTRANS CASE ACURB RAMPCoC STD S/WCoC STD CURB AND GUTTER(AS-6)CALTRANS CASE ACURB RAMPCoC STD CURB AND GUTTER(AS-6)MARKING5DT055DT05119991202+37.42 19.92' RTC 215.50± CONFORM202+31.42 17.01' RTC 215.61202+25.75 17.10' RTC 215.70202+21.55 17.16' RTC 215.73202+16.02 17.24' RTC 215.74202+10.38 19.99' RTC 215.70± CONFORM202+48.33 29.36' RBOW 215.80± CONFORM202+48.37 19.98' RTC 215.40±CONFORM202+33.13 29.27' RBOW 215.80± CONFORM202+20.63 29.28' RBOW 216.00± CONFORM202+08.03 24.89' RFOW 215.90± AP CONFORM202+08.04 29.27' RBOW 216.10± CONFORM202+37.46 20.09' LTC 215.50± CONFORM202+31.88 17.23' LTC 215.54202+37.60 29.54' LBOW 215.50± CONFORM202+25.80 17.37' LTC 215.63202+25.75 29.70' LBOW 215.60±202+21.55 29.70' LBOW 215.70±202+21.57 17.37' LTC 215.65202+07.98 29.68' LBOW 215.90±202+15.68 17.37' LTC 215.67202+07.99 20.20' LTC 215.80± CONFORM202+37.51 13.31' L 215.30± CONFORM 202+08.14 12.87' L 215.60± CONFORM 202+48.28 12.76' R 215.20± CONFORM 202+10.32 13.33' R 215.60± CONFORM 201+00 19991200+82.11 39.85' RTC 215.91200+88.17 56.65' RTC 215.50±CONFORM200+92.95 57.44' RFOW 215.80± GB CONFORM200+97.36 58.17' RBOW 215.80± CONFORM200+99.24 46.86' RBOW 215.90± ER CONFORM201+00.43 33.57' RFOW 215.93 GB200+97.03 39.08' RFOW 215.90 GB201+18.90 29.22' RBOW 216.50± ER CONFORM201+18.83 24.74' RFOW 215.40± CONFORM201+18.75 19.87' RTC 216.30± CONFORM201+18.69 15.87' R 216.10± CONFORM200+95.34 22.38' RTC 216.27200+88.22 27.55' RTC 216.14200+84.88 31.92' RTC 216.07200+82.22 38.00' RTC 215.96200+77.48 16.47' R216.30± CONFORM200+78.06 56.79' R215.30± CONFORMzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF IP10FOR GRADING DETAILS,SEE BELOWFOR GRADING DETAILS,SEE BELOWPLANSCALE: 1" = 20'PLANSCALE: 1" = 10'PLANSCALE: 1" = 10'MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP06MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP06BLANEY AVE "B" LINE "R1" LINE"R2" LINE"B" LINE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILEBLANEY AVELA MAR DR DE PALMA LN HALL CT BLANEY AVE 1709/17/19 77 of 132 303+00303+37.68 40.19' LTC 210.71303+37.32 41.32' LTC 210.70303+33.35 27.69' LTC 210.82302+98.90 19.96' LTC 211.20±CONFORM302+98.83 29.39' LBOW 211.40± CONFORM303+37.59 38.24' LTC 210.73303+35.87 31.80' LTC 210.79303+40.48 54.71' L210.20± CONFORM303+18.13 20.12' L TC 210.96 303+22.11 20.62' L TC 210.93 303+28.06 23.03' L TC 210.88 303+11.48 20.06' L TC 211.04 303+19.23 55.64' LBOW 211.50± CONFORM303+28.85 54.11' LTC 210.30± CONFORM303+42.41 16.61' L210.70± CONFORM302+99.13 15.67' L210.80± CONFORM301+0019641301+01.24 26.54' RFOW 212.60± CONFORM301+01.64 31.13' RBOW 212.60± CONFORM300+87.04 54.00' RBOW 212.90± CONFORM300+88.68 41.93' RBOW 212.80± CONFORM300+99.69 31.80' RBOW 212.70± CONFORM300+84.51 40.08' RFOW 216.76301+00.61 19.39' RTC 212.48301+12.85 16.51' R212.10± CONFORM300+86.82 18.71' RTC 212.63300+82.81 19.70' RTC 212.66300+77.01 22.90' RTC 212.69300+66.07 13.38' R212.90± CONFORM300+72.66 27.66' RTC 212.72300+70.70 31.46' RTC 212.74300+69.45 37.86' RTC 212.77300+70.04 39.71' RTC 212.79300+65.89 53.63' R 212.60± CONFORM300+77.39 53.74' RTC 212.80± CONFORM301+59.66 22.96' RTC 212.00± CONFORM301+59.72 31.98' RTC 212.10± CONFORMSTOPSTOPSTOP STOPSTOPSTOPLINE TABLELINEL39LENGTH448.77'BEARINGN13°31'36"EBEGIN NORTHING1941555.95BEGIN EASTING6120528.71END NORTHING1941992.27END EASTING6120633.6868+0068+55 301+00302+00303+00304+00L39"E" LINE"R2" LINE 68+55 = "E" LINE 301+88.29196601964119661R/WR/W3DT06222212"WHITEMARKINGR1-13DT06R9-5R9-5R1-2R1-2MARKINGMARKINGR1-1R1-111'R1-1MARKINGMARKING12"WHITE11'EX SIGN POSTPROTECT IN PLACEEX SIGN POSTPROTECT IN PLACE11'CoC STD S/WCALTRANS CASE ACURB RAMPCoC STD S/WCoC STD CURB AND GUTTER(A2-6)CALTRANS CASE ACURB RAMPCoC STD CURB AND GUTTER(A2-6)CoC STD S/WCoC STD S/W4DT064DT051DT04STOP68+55 302+00301+98.74 16.72' LTC 211.80± CONFORM301+98.65 26.13' LBOW 212.00± CONFORM301+76.38 26.09' LBOW 212.20± CONFORM301+57.24 26.46' LBOW 212.30± CONFORM301+56.92 17.14' LTC 212.10± CONFORM301+84.68 8.72' LTC 212.83301+90.63 12.19' LFS 211.50± CONFORM301+84.84 3.27' RFS 215.55301+90.84 3.26' RFS 212.10± CONFORM301+72.84 3.10' RFS 212.64301+66.84 3.02' RFS 212.10± CONFORM301+91.06 18.79' RFS 211.50± CONFORM302+00.00 23.52' RTC 211.70± CONFORM302+00.20 32.57' RBOW 211.80± CONFORM301+84.39 26.04' LBOW 212.10± CONFORM301+72.61 8.77' LTC 212.93301+66.96 18.86' RFS 211.65± CONFORM301+59.66 22.96' RTC 212.00± CONFORM301+59.72 31.98' RTC 212.10± CONFORM301+84.97 15.52' RTC 212.83301+73.02 15.39' RTC 212.92301+66.52 12.08' LFS 211.73± CONFORMzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF IP11VICKSBURG DRE ESTATES DR1" = 10'FOR GRADING DETAILS,SEE RIGHTFOR GRADING DETAILS,SEE BELOWFOR GRADING DETAILS,SEE BELOWMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET IP09PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'PLANSCALE: 1" = 10'E ESTATES DRPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'PLANSCALE: 1" = 10'IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROFILELA MAR DR E ESTATES DR"R2 LINE"1809/17/19 78 of 132 0+001+002+003+004+004+173+47.00 7.00' LT "L" 4" AD~GR 232.1 INV 229.74~4" 10+00 11+00 10+52.69 1.00' LT "R1"INSTALL END CAPINV 229.386" SD 4" SD 4 " S D 3+58.04 20.24' LT "L" 4" AD~GR 232.5± INV 229.66~4"~45° BEND 10+63.30 1.00' LT "R1" INSTALL 4"X6"X6" TEE INV 229.32 11'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.00517'~6" HDPE@ S=0.00566'~6" HDPE @ S=0.005 1044110425REGNART CREEK "L" LINE"L" LINE"R1" LINE12+0013+0014+0015+0016+0015+57.36 1.00' LT INSTALL 6"X6"X6" TEE INV 226.85 15+57.09 11.00' LT2'X2' SDDI~GR 232.0INV 226.66~6" HDPEEX INV 224.5±~18" CMP6" SD 493'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00510'~6" HDPE SOLID@ S=0.020EX 18" CMPEX SD OUTFALLEX INV 223.13~18" CMP103951038510375103651035510345REGNART CREEK"R1" LINEzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE S T.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF DRAINAGE PLAND01PACIFICA DRTORRE AVE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D02PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' MATCH LINE - SEE BELOW1909/17/19 79 of 132 16+0017+0018+0019+0020+0021+0016+92.35 1.00' LTINSTALL END CAPINV 228.00135'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00817+78.37 1.00' LT INSTALL END CAP INV 224.30 17+96.91 1.03' LT AP~INV 224.21 18+82.42 0.97' LT AP~INV 223.78 20+24.68 1.05' LT AP~INV 223.07 20+76.23 1.00' LT AP~INV 222.81 20+82.37 1.00' LT INSTALL 6"X6"X6" TEE INV 222.81 19'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 86'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.005142'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00552'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.0056'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 13'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.020 EX SD OUTFALL EX INV 218.54 15" CMP 6" SD 6" SD 21+01.47 1.00' LTINSTALL 90° BENDINV 222.00~6" HDPE10335103251030510295102851027510265REGNART CREEK"R1" LINE21+00 22+0023+0024+0025+0026+0020+82.37 1.00' LTINSTALL 6"X6"X6" TEEINV 222.81@ S=0.00513'~6" HDPE SOLID @S=0.020EX SD OUTFALLEX INV 218.5415" CMPEX SD OUTFALLEX INV 215.41~60" CMP6" SD 21+01.47 1.00' LTINSTALL 90° BENDINV 222.00~6" HDPE134~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00512'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.005 25+01.59 18.17' LT "R1" EX INV 219.8±~15" CMP INV 219.90~6" HDPE EX SD OUTFALLEX INV 218.27~15" CMP22+34.19 1.00' LT "R1"INV 221.33~ER22+49.94 1.00' LT "R1"INV 221.27~ER 22+91.65 1.00' LT "R1" INV 221.04~ER 23+67.94 1.00' LT "R1" INV 220.66~AP 24+50.91 0.95' LT "R1" INV 220.25~AP 25+01.47 1.00' LT "R1" INV 219.99 46'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 76'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 83'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 51'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 17'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.005 43'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.017 25+98.40 0.95' LT "R1" INV 218.18 25+76.33 1.03' LT "R1" INV 218.55 25+33.38 1.01' LT "R1" INV 219.28 25+03.47 1.00' LT "R1" INSTALL END CAP INV 219.79 22'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.017 98'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.017 30'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.01720217201972018720177 201672015720147202322022220202201922018210265REGNART CREEK"R1" LINEzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D01 D02MATCH LIN E - S E E B E L O WPLANSCALE: 1" = 20' MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVEMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D03 RODRIGUES AVEPLANSCALE: 1" = 20' DRAINAGE PLAN2009/17/19 80 of 132 27+0028+0029+0030+0031+0032+0033+0027+60.45 1.00' LT "R1"INV 215.4227+21.87 0.72' LT "R1"INV 216.0726+99.81 1.34' LT "R1"INV 216.4426+96.23 1.00' LT "R1"INV 216.5138'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.01722'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.0174'~6" HDPE SOLID@ S=0.017101'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.01028+61.14 1.00' LT "R1"INV 214.4128+81.22 1.00' LT "R1"INV 214.21 29+38.93 1.00' LT "R1" INV 213.63 29+78.93 1.00' LT "R1" INV 213.23 30+72.56 1.00' LT "R1" INV 212.30 20'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.010 58'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.010 40'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.010 93'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.010 30+82.93 1.24' LT "R1" INV 212.25 30+93.33 1.00' LT "R1" INV 212.20 10'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.005 10'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.005 31+00.48 1.00' LT "R1" INV 212.16 31+18.05 1.00' LT "R1" INV 212.08 31+72.69 1.00' LT "R1" INV 211.80 31+79.56 1.00' LT "R1" INV 211.77 32+03.92 1.00' LT "R1" INV 211.65 33+02.66 1.00' LT "R1"INV 215.0733+73.74 1.00' LT "R1"INV 214.727'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 18'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 55'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 7'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 24'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 59'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00538'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 32+42.20 1.00' LT "R1" INV 211.46 32+42.27 12.50' LT "R1" 36"X36" DI~GR 216.3 INV 211.22~6" HDPE EX INV 211.0±~30" CMP 12'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.020EX SD OUTFALLEX INV 209.5±~30" CMP71'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00532+44.19 1.00' LT "R1"INSTALL END CAPINV 215.3620137201232010920095200832007110358103681037810388200452003520025200302002010275103851035520147201821030220020REGNART CREEK"R1" LINE35+9334+0035+0050+0051+0033+73.74 1.00' LT "R1"INV 214.7235+03.29 1.00' LT "R1"INV 214.07 35+30.95 1.00' LT "R1" INV 213.93 35+13.66 1.00' LT "R1" INV 214.02 35+48.83 1.00' LT "R1"INSTALL END CAPINV 214.00129'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00510'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.005 18'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 EX SDCB~GR 215.3±EX INV 213.1±~12" CMPINV 213.60~6" HDPE13'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.02012'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.00535+32.61 12.74' LT "R1"2'X2' SDDI~GR 215.7INV 213.8635+32.61 1.00' LT "R1"INSTALL 6"X6"X6" TEEINV 213.9216'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.0052'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 71'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.00550+30.21 3.89' LT "R2" INSTALL END CAP INV 214.40 10'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 6'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 50+44.08 2.93' RT "R2" INV 214.32 103081027510314103011999119990 2002010275REGNART CREEK"R1" LINEBLANEY AVE 51+0052+0053+00605'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 19971199511993710280102851029519991"R2" LINEzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH L INE - SEE BELOWD03MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D02 DE PALMA LNPLANSCALE: 1" = 20'MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVEPLANSCALE: 1" = 20' MATCH LINE - SEE RIGHT PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' DRAINAGE PLANMATCH LINE - SEE LEFT MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D0421 09/17/19 81 of 132 21111133333322254+0055+0056+0057+0058+0059+0060+00400+00401+00402+00403+00BC = 400+77.26 PRC = 401+38.62EC = 401+82.97BC = 402+60.9256+87.39 3.15' RT "R2" 2'X2' SDDI~GR 214.4 INV 211.10~6" HDPE EX INV 207.4±~18" 38'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.005 56+49.17 3.11' RT "R2" INV 211.30 400+72.77 5.00' RT "W" 1'X1' SDDI~GR 212.3 INV 209.30~6" HDPE 403+08.98 11.50' RT "W"1'X1' SDDI~GR 209.9INV 206.38~6" HDPE401+43.23 16.57' RT "W"EX SDDI~GR 211.2±EX INV 207.7± ~6"INV 208.55~6"75'~6" HDPE SOLID @ S=0.010199251991319901198851986719851 19841198311982119811REGNART CREEK403+08.89 42.97' LT "W"EX SDDI~GR 208.2±EX INV 206.0±~8"INV 206.10~6"55'~6" HDPESOLID @ S=0.005POTENTIALBIOTREATMENT CELLEX SD OUTFALLEX INV 206.3±~18" CMP"R2" LINE"W" LINE60+0061+0062+0063+0064+0065+0066+00403+08.98 11.50' RT "W"1978719773197591973119717197031975619736197181970219811198011974519766REGNART CREEKEX SD OUTFALL EX INV 206.5±~12" CMP EX SD OUTFALL EX INV 206.7±~15" CMP 60+21.04 3.07' RTINSTALL END CAPINV 210.57233'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.010 62+53.74 3.00' RT INSTALL 6"X6"X6" TEE INV 208.24 62+53.74 1.00' RT 2'X2' SDDI~GR 212.1 INV 208.22~6" HDPE EX INV 207.2±~15" CMP 64+81.29 9.49' RT EX SDDI~GR 212.0± ADJUST GRATE TO GRADE EX INV 209.8±~12" CMP 63+95.00 1.58' RT INV 208.95 63+85.00 2.96' RT INV 208.90 10'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 131'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 "R2" LINE"W" LINEzuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D03 MATCH LINE - SEE BELOWD04MATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D05 PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' PLANSCALE: 1" = 20' DRAINAGE PLAN2209/17/19 82 of 132 STOPSTOP66+0067+0068+0068+55196881967419660196891967519661 19641 19661 1036019660REGNART CREEK68+26.83 3.32' RT INSTALL END CAP INV 211.00 27'~6" HDPE PERF @ S=0.005 67+99.32 2.35' RTINV 210.96404'~6" HDPEPERF @ S=0.005 301+00 302+00 303+00 301+55.67 17.20' LT SDBC~TC 212.15 INV 207.7~12"301+58.35 22.95' RT "E"SDBC~TC 212.00INV 207.50~12"301+75.85 2.01' LT "E"EX SDMH~RIM 212.1±EX INV 205.1±~15"EX INV 204.9±~18"INV 207.20~12" SWINV 206.90~12" SE25'~12" RCP @ S=0.020 30'~12" RCP@ S=0.020"R2" LINE"E" LINE SLOPE TO DRAINSLOPE TO DRAIN4" PLASTIC ATRIUMGRATE (COLOR GREEN)LONG RADIUSFITTING 1/8 BENDINSTALLVERTICALLY ANDCUT TO LENGTH(RISER TO BE 4")WYE CONNECTIONSD PIPE. SEE PLANFOR SIZE & SLOPEAREA DRAINNTSTYPD05zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF D05PLANSCALE: 1" = 40'DRAINAGE PLANMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET D04 2309/17/19 83 of 132 R/W R/WR/W R/W PACIFICA DRIVETORRE AVENUE KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L01L03L04L02zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L01( In Feet )1 inch = 50 feetGRAPHIC SCALE2001005025050TREE PROTECTION PLANMATCHLINE, SEE SHEET L02NOTES:1.WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS TO TAKE PLACE BENEATH A TREECANOPY, FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED PER DETAIL A ONSHEET L05.2.SEE TREE PROTECTION NOTES, L05.EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDTREE PROTECTION LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN1" = 50'ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREA (ESA),TYPICAL.2409/17/19 84 of 132 R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WRODRIGUES AVENUEKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L01L03L04L02zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L02( In Feet )1 inch = 50 feetGRAPHIC SCALE2001005025050TREE PROTECTION PLANMATCHLINE, SEE SHEET L01NOTES:1.WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS TO TAKE PLACE BENEATH A TREECANOPY, FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED PER DETAIL A ONSHEET L05.2.SEE TREE PROTECTION NOTES, L05.EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDTREE PROTECTION LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLEXISTING TREE TO REMAINDE PALMA LANEMATCHLINE, SEE SHEET L031" = 50'ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREA (ESA),TYPICAL.2509/17/19 85 of 132 R/WR/WR/WR/WR/W SOUTH BLANEY AVENUE KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L01L03L04L02zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L03( In Feet )1 inch = 50 feetGRAPHIC SCALE2001005025050TREE PROTECTION PLANNOTES:1.WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS TO TAKE PLACE BENEATH A TREECANOPY, FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED PER DETAIL A ONSHEET L05.2.SEE TREE PROTECTION NOTES, L05.EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDTREE PROTECTION LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLEXISTING TREE TO REMAINMATCHLINE, SEE SHEET L04 MATCHLINE, SEE SHEET L021" = 50'ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREA (ESA),TYPICAL.2609/17/19 86 of 132 R/WR/WEAST E S T A T E S D R I V E KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L01L03L04L02zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L04( In Feet )1 inch = 50 feetGRAPHIC SCALE2001005025050TREE PROTECTION PLANNOTES:1.WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS TO TAKE PLACE BENEATH A TREECANOPY, FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED PER DETAIL A ONSHEET L05.2.SEE TREE PROTECTION NOTES, L05.EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDTREE PROTECTION LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLEXISTING TREE TO REMAINMATCHLINE, SEE SHEET L031" = 50'ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREA (ESA),TYPICAL.2709/17/19 87 of 132 Azuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L05TREE PROTECTION NOTES AND DETAILTREE PROTECTION NOTESSECTION ISITE PREPARATION: ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL BE FENCED OFF WITHIN, AT OR OUTSIDE THE DRIPLINE (FOLIAR SPREAD) OF THE TREE USING THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: TWELVE INCHES IN DISTANCEFROM THE TRUNK FOR EVERY INCH IN TRUNK DIAMETER, MEASURED 2.0 FEET ABOVE THE AVERAGEGROUND LEVEL. EXAMPLE: A 24 INCH DIAMETER TREE WOULD HAVE A FENCE ERECTED 24 FEET FROMTHE BASE OF THE TREE (24 X 12 = 288 / 12 = 24). THE FENCE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET HIGH,MADE OF WIRE WITH STEEL STAKES, SUCH AS CYCLONE FENCING. IF THE FENCE IS WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREES, EVERY ATTEMPT SHOULD BE MADE TO RELOCATE THE FENCE OUTSIDE THEDRIPLINE OF THE TREE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, THE TREE SHALL BE PRUNED TO REDUCE THE CHANCE OFLIMB BREAKAGE FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ENCROACHING WITHIN THE DRIP LINE. ALLCONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS AND OTHER PERSONNEL SHALL BE WARNED THATENCROACHMENT WITHIN THE FENCED AREA IS FORBIDDEN WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE CERTIFIEDARBORIST ON THE JOB. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, STORAGE OF LUMBER AND OTHERMATERIALS, DISPOSAL OF PAINTS, SOLVENTS OR OTHER NOXIOUS MATERIALS, PARKED CARS,GRADING EQUIPMENT OR OTHER HEAVY EQUIPMENT. PENALTIES, BASED ON THE COST OF REMEDIALREPAIRS AND THE EVALUATION GUIDE PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OFARBORICULTURE, SHALL BE ASSESSED FOR DAMAGES TO THE TREES.SECTION IIGRADING/EXCAVATING: ALL GRADING PLANS THAT SPECIFY GRADING WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF ANYTREE, OR WITHIN THE DISTANCE FROM THE TRUNK AS OUTLINED IN SECTION I WHEN SAID DISTANCE ISOUTSIDE THE DRIP LINE, SHALL FIRST BE REVIEWED BY THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST. PROVISIONS FORAERATION, DRAINAGE, PRUNING, TUNNELING BENEATH ROOTS, ROOT PRUNING OR OTHER NECESSARYACTIONS TO PROTECT THE TREES SHALL BE OUTLINED BY THE ARBORIST. IF TRENCHING ISNECESSARY WITHIN THE AREA AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, SAID TRENCHING SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN BYHAND LABOR. ALL ROOTS 2 INCHES OR LARGER SHALL BE TUNNELED UNDER AND OTHER ROOTSSHALL BE CUT SMOOTHLY TO THE TRUNK SIDE OF THE TRENCH. THE TRUNK SIDE SHOULD BE DRAPEDIMMEDIATELY WITH TWO LAYERS OF UNTREATED BURLAP TO A DEPTH OF 3 FEET FROM THE SURFACE.THE BURLAP SHALL BE SOAKED NIGHTLY AND LEFT IN PLACE UNTIL THE TRENCH IS BACK FILLED TOTHE ORIGINAL LEVEL. THE ARBORIST SHALL EXAMINE THE TRENCH PRIOR TO BACK FILLING TOASCERTAIN THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF ROOTS CUT, SO AS TO SUGGEST THE NECESSARY REMEDIALREPAIRS.SECTION IIIREMEDIAL REPAIRS: THE ARBORIST ON THE JOB SHALL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OBSERVING ALLONGOING ACTIVITIES THAT MAY AFFECT THE TREES, AND PRESCRIBING NECESSARY REMEDIAL WORKTO INSURE THE HEALTH AND STABILITY OF SAID TREES. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ALLARBORIST ACTIVITIES BROUGHT OUT IN SECTIONS I AND II. IN ADDITION, PRUNING, AS OUTLINED INTHE "PRUNING STANDARDS" OF THE WESTERN CHAPTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OFARBORICULTURE, SHALL BE PRESCRIBED AS NECESSARY. FERTILIZING, AERATION, IRRIGATION, PESTCONTROL AND OTHER ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PRESCRIBED ACCORDING TO THE TREE NEEDS, LOCALSITE REQUIREMENTS, AND STATE AGRICULTURAL PEST CONTROL LAWS. ALL SPECIFICATIONS SHALLBE IN WRITING. FOR PEST CONTROL OPERATIONS, CONSULT THE LOCAL COUNTY AGRICULTURALCOMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR INDIVIDUALS LICENSED AS PEST CONTROL ADVISORS OR PESTCONTROL OPERATORS.SECTION IVFINAL INSPECTION: UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE ARBORIST SHALL REVIEW ALL WORKUNDERTAKEN THAT MAY IMPACT THE EXISTING TREES. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO CUTSAND FILLS, COMPACTING, DRAINAGE, PRUNING AND FUTURE REMEDIAL WORK. THE ARBORIST SHOULDSUBMIT A FINAL REPORT IN WRITING OUTLINING THE ONGOING REMEDIAL CARE FOLLOWING THE FINALINSPECTION.SECTION VTREE RELOCATION:·TREES TO BE RELOCATED SHALL BE RELOCATED DURING THE FALL MONTHS. FOR DECIDUOUSTREES, RELOCATION SHALL OCCUR AFTER LEAF DROP.·THE SOIL BENEATH THE DRIPLINE OF TREES TO BE RELOCATED SHALL BE WATERED 72 HOURSPRIOR TO RELOCATION SO THE SOIL IS MOIST, BUT NOT SATURATED AT THE TIME OFRELOCATION.·LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR ARBORIST SHALL SUPERVISE THE RELOCATION SO TREE CAN BETRANSPLANTED IN A OPTIMAL ORIENTATION.·ROOT BALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 30 INCHES DEEP. THE ROOT BALL EXCAVATIONDIAMETER SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 10 INCHES PER 1 INCH OF TRUNK DIAMETER. ROOTBALLSHALL BE SUPPORTED DURING TRANSPORT AND WRAPPED IN WIRE OR BURLAP.·ALL TREES SHALL BE TRANSPLANTED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF EXCAVATION.·TRANSPLANT HOLE SHALL BE PREPARED AND TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL, BUTNO DEEPER THAN THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL.·TRIMMING AND PRUNING OF RELOCATED TREE SHALL BE LIMITED TO DISEASED OR DAMAGEDLIMBS FOR THE YEAR FOLLOWING THE TRANSPLANT.TREE PROTECTION DETAILSCALE: NONENOTES:1.PROTECTION FOR TREES SHALL BEPROVIDED BEFORE GRADING OROTHER EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ONTHE PROPERTY. WHENCONSTRUCTION IS TO TAKE PLACEBENEATH A TREE CANOPY FENCINGSHALL BE LOCATED PER ARBORIST. IFCONSTRUCTION OR PAVING IS TOTAKE PLACE THROUGHOUT THE AREABENEATH CANOPY, AND DRIP LINEFENCING IS NOT PRACTICAL, WATTLEAND SNOW FENCING SHOULD BE USEDTO PROTECT THE TRUNKS FROMDAMAGE PER DETAIL.2.PRUNING MAY BE NECESSARY TOFACILITATE REMOVAL OF DEAD WOOD,CONFLICT WITH NEW STRUCTURE, ORREDUCE STRESS AND SHALL BECARRIED OUT BY A QUALIFIEDARBORIST.3.CONSULT WITH ARBORIST TODETERMINE FERTILIZING ANDWATERING SCHEDULE FOR EXISTINGTREES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TOREDUCE SHOCK AND STRESS.4.ONLY TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OFGRADING OR ADJACENT TOCONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS ANDCONSTRUCTION ACCESS AREASSHALL RECEIVE TREE PROTECTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH ARBORISTFOR METHODS OF TRENCHING FORINSTALLATION FOR UTILITIES WITHINROOTZONE.DRIP LINE FENCE THE PERIMETER OF DRIP LINE WITH 6'HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE. SECURE ONE SIGNPER ZONE AS DETAILED BELOW OR APPROVEDEQUAL TO FENCE WITH WIRE TIES.WHERE PROTECTIVE FENCING CAN NOT BEINSTALLED AT THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE ORWHEN FENCING IS REMOVED FORCONSTRUCTION, INSTALL LODGE POLE POSTS (4PER TREE) AROUND TREE AND WRAP TRUNK INSTRAW WADDLE THEN ORANGE SNOW FENCINGTO BRANCHING STRUCTURE.SECTIONTREE PROTECTION ZONEDO NOT REMOVE EXCEPT FOR UNDER THEDIRECTION OF THE PROJECT ARBORISTSIGN123DRIP LINE 132AS NOTED2809/17/19 88 of 132 10'-0 " TYP4'-6"R20'-0 "1'-6"TYPPAPA1'-6"8'-0 "60° TYP19'-10"16'-5"4'-0 "4'-6 " 13'-0"5'-6"CL CLCL R/WR/W PACIFICA DRIVETORRE AVENUE KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L06( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANEXISTING PLANTING AND TURF TOREMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIRAND REPLACE IF DAMAGED, TYPICAL.EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK, CURB,AND GUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCELANDSCAPE WALLTYPICALL14APEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'A'TYPICALL13AVEHICULAR CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'B'L13BEXISTING LIGHT POLETO REMAIN.EXISTING MONUMENTSIGN TO BE RELOCATEDPER CITY DIRECTION.PRIMARY TRAILHEAD SIGNL15AIRREGULAR EDGE ON PEDESTRIAN PAVINGWITH STAMP "A". 2' - 4' WIDTH TYPICAL.1" = 10'2909/17/19 89 of 132 4'-9"R12'-0"CL3'-6"R 1 2 ' - 5 " 4'-6"R/WR/WR/WPACIFICA DRIVEKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.EXISTING WATER METERS ANDBACKFLOW TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L07( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANTRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.EXISTING PLANTING AND TURF TOREMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIRAND REPLACE IF DAMAGED, TYPICAL.EXISTING STORMWATERPIPE TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING DRIVEWAYAPPROACH TO REMAIN.EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK, CURB,AND GUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCEPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'A'TYPICALL13AVEHICULAR CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'B'L13BPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGL13ASECONDARY TRAILHEAD SIGNL14CIRREGULAR EDGE ON PEDESTRIAN PAVINGWITH STAMP "A". 2' - 4' WIDTH TYPICAL.1" = 10'3009/17/19 90 of 132 8'-0" R/W R/W R/W R/W KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.RAILING, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L08( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANTRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.EXISTING PARKING TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCEPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'A'TYPICALL13AVEHICULAR CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'B'L13BIRREGULAR EDGE ON VEHICULAR PAVINGWITH STAMP "B". 2' - 4' WIDTH TYPICAL.1" = 10'3109/17/19 91 of 132 2'-0"2'-0"10'-0" TYP1'-6"TYPPAPA1'-0" TYP30'-10" TYP22'-8" TYP R/ W R/WR/WR/WRODRIGUES AVENUEKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.EXISTING UTILITIESTO REMAIN, TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L09( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANEXISTING STORMWATER OUTLETTO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING DRIVEWAYAPPROACH TO REMAIN.EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK, CURB, ANDGUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCESPLIT RAIL FENCETYPICALL14BLANDSCAPE WALLTYPICALL14APEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'A'TYPICALL13AVEHICULAR CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'B'L13BPRIMARY TRAILHEAD SIGNL15AIRREGULAR EDGE ON VEHICULAR PAVINGWITH STAMP "B".1" = 10'RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.3209/17/19 92 of 132 STOPSTOP 4'-6"CL 2'-0"CL4'-6"CL 2'-0"CLR/WR/WR/WR/WSOUTH BLANEY AVENUE KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.CROSSWALK MARKINGS, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L10( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANEXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACHTO REMAIN, TYPICAL.RRFB, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.CURB RAMP AND TRUNCATED DOMES,SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS, TYPICAL.EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB ANDGUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCESECONDARY TRAILHEAD SIGNL14C1" = 10'RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.TYPICAL3309/17/19 93 of 132 211111333333222R10 ' - 0 " R3'- 0 " T Y P 16'-0" TYP3'-0" TYP 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"6'-0" TYP1'-6" TYP 4'-6" 8'-6"6'-0"5'-6" 6'-0" 4'-0"5'-6"3'-0"5'-0"4'-0"5'-6"1'-6"4'-6"33'-0"CL17'-0"PAPAPAPAR4' -0 " 19'-4"1'-7"2'-5"78° TYP5'-0"403+00404+00 CL5'-0"87°404+02 R/W R/WR/WKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.EXISTING WATER METER TO VERIFYIN FIELD AND REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING BASEBALL FIELDFENCE TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING CONCRETEPICNIC AREA WITHBARBECUE TO REMAIN.BRIDGE, SEE STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L11( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANEXISTING TURF TO REMAIN.CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANDREPLACE IF DAMAGED, TYPICAL.EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOXES TOVERIFY IN FIELD AND REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING AC WALKWAYREMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCESPLIT RAIL FENCETYPICALL14BLANDSCAPE WALLTYPICALL14ASPECIMEN STONETYPICALL13EPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGL13APEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING WITH STAMP 'A'TYPICALL13AIRREGULAR EDGE ON VEHICULAR PAVINGWITH STAMP "B". 8' - 10' WIDTH TYPICAL.PRIMARY TRAILHEAD SIGNL15A1" = 10'402+87.5RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.BIOTREATMENTAREA, TYPICAL.3409/17/19 94 of 132 STOP2'-6"CL 2'-6"CLR/WR/W( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010LANDSCAPE PLANEAST EST A T E S D R I V E KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L06L07L08L09L10L11L12EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREA (ESA),TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L12EXISTING OVERHEADPOWERLINES TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB ANDGUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.CROSSWALK MARKINGS, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.RRFB, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.EXISTING BICYCLE TRAIL TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.NOTES:1.SEE SHEETS L13 - L15 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.2.SEE SHEET L16 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND MATERIALS LIST.CONCRETE HEADERRRADIUSCL ALIGNEQPAPLANTING AREAEQUALTYPTYPICALEXPANSION JOINTBACK OF WALKBOWLANDSCAPE WALLCENTER LINECONTROL JOINTLANDSCAPE LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVINGPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'A'VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP 'B'SPLIT RAIL FENCESECONDARY TRAILHEAD SIGNL14C1" = 10'RAILING, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.3509/17/19 95 of 132 ACEBDzuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L13LANDSCAPE DETAILSEXPANSION JOINTCONTROL JOINT3/4"PAVING JOINTS (PEDESTRIAN)SCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTES:1.SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR COLOR,TYPE AND FINISH.2.CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDEDAS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND WITH AMAXIMUM SPACING OF 8' O.C.EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE ASSHOWN ON PLANS WITH A MAXIMUMSPACING OF 12' O.C.1/2" RADIUS EDGE1/2"X3" POLYFELT EXPANSION JOINT(TYPICAL). TOP WITH 2 PARTSELF-LEVELING SEALER TO MATCHCONCRETE COLORTOOLED OR SAW CUT CONTROL JOINT3/4" DEEPREINFORCEMENT PER PAVING DETAIL12" SMOOTH DOWEL. SLEEVE ORGREASE ONE END. FOR SIDEWALKS UPTO 8' WIDE USE 2 EQUALLY SPACEDDOWELS PER EXPANSION JOINT. FORFLAT WORK GREATER THAN 8' WIDE ANDAT CURBS SPACE DOWELS AT 36" O.C. ATEXPANSION JOINT.CONCRETE PAVING, SEE CONCRETEPAVING DETAIL12345643612546EXPANSION JOINTCONTROL JOINTPAVING JOINTS (VEHICULAR)SCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTES:1.SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR COLOR,TYPE AND FINISH.1/2" RADIUS EDGE1/2"X5" POLYFELT EXPANSION JOINT(TYPICAL). TOP WITH 2 PARTSELF-LEVELING SEALER.TOOLED OR SAW CUT CONTROL JOINT3/4" DEEPCONCRETE PAVING, SEE DETAILREINFORCEMENT PER VEHICULARPAVING DETAIL24" SMOOTH DOWEL. SLEEVE ORGREASE ONE END. FOR SIDEWALKS UPTO 8' WIDE USE 2 EQUALLY SPACEDDOWELS PER EXPANSION JOINT. FORFLAT WORK GREATER THAN 8' WIDE & ATCURBS SPACE DOWELS AT 36" O.C. ATEXPANSION JOINT.3/4"12345634124556CONCRETE PAVING (PEDESTRIAN)SCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTES:1.SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR COLOR TYPEAND FINISH.4" THICK CONCRETE PAVING4" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASEFINISH GRADE TO BE 1" BELOW FORTURF, 2" FOR SHRUB AREASCOMPACTED SUBGRADE#3 REBAR @ 18" O.C. EACH WAY1/2" RADIUS EDGE123456123456CONCRETE PAVING (VEHICULAR)SCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTE:1.SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR COLOR,TYPE AND FINISH.6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING6" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASEFINISHED GRADE 1" BELOW FOR TURF 2"BELOW FOR SHRUB AREASCOMPACTED SUBGRADE#3 REBAR @ 18" O.C. EACH WAY1/2" RADIUS EDGE123456156324NOTES:1. SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR TYPE ANDSIZE.SPECIMEN STONEFINISHED GRADENATIVE GRADE OR CERTIFIEDCOMPACTED SUBGRADE2/31/3SPECIMEN STONESCALE: N.T.S.123123AS NOTED3609/17/19 96 of 132 ABCzuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L14LANDSCAPE DETAILSSPLIT RAIL FENCESCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"8'-0"3'-9"1'-2"NOTES:1.ALL FENCE POSTS AND FOOTINGS TO BE NEW.2.USE DRILLED MORTISE AND CARVED TENON ATTACHMENT METHOD FOR RAIL TOPOST CONNECTION.2" x 6" CEDAR RAILSFINISH SURFACE/GRADE SEE PLAN4"x4" SPLIT CEDAR POSTS @ 8' ONCENTER MAX.CONCRETE FOOTING1'-2"1'-6"3" COMPACTED SUBGRADEBASE ROCK PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT6"ADJACENT PLANTINGSECTIONELEVATION12345671271365121'-2"9"9"LANDSCAPE WALLSCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTES:1.REFER TO MATERIALS LIST FORCOLOR, TYPE AND FINISH.1/2" RADIUS ROUND HORIZONTAL EDGES, CHAMFER ALL VERTICALS, TYPICAL1'-0" MIN.21" MAX. SEEGRADING PLANS.12"12"TYP.1'-6"POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE WALLREBAR #4 CONTINUOUSADJACENT PAVING PER PLAN8" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASECERTIFIED COMPACTED SUBGRADE.CONCRETE FOOTING123567857863OVERALL LENGTH PER PLANSECTIONSIDE ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATIONREBAR #4 @ 16" O.C. CLEAR,ALTERNATE HOOKS INTO FOOTING ASSHOWN449123" CLR.MIN.99BOARD FORM FINISH911EXPANSION JOINT1010SECONDARY TRAILHEAD SIGNSCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTES:1. SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR COLOR, TYPEAND FINISH.A A GLUE LAMINATED TIMBER BEAMS#4 REBAR, 12" O.C. EACH WAY, 3" CLEARMINIMUM, TYPICAL8" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASENATIVE SUBGRADE1234568THREADED BOLT B, SIZE TBDTHREADED BOLT C, SIZE TBD1/4" CARBON STEEL BASE PLATEPOURED IN PLACE CONRETE FOOTING,SIZE TBD791/4" CUSTOM CARBON STEELESCUTCHEONTHREADED BOLT D, SIZE TBD10SIDE ELEVATION A45671238910CARBON STEEL PANEL WITH LASERCUT LETTERING11118'-0" 7"7"3'-9"3 1/2"1'-3"1'-6"FRONT ELEVATION45671238910118"6"AS NOTED3709/17/19 97 of 132 Azuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L15LANDSCAPE DETAILSPRIMARY TRAILHEAD SIGNSCALE: 1"=1'-0"NOTES:1.SEE MATERIALS LIST FOR COLORSAND FINISHES.GLUE LAMINATED TIMBER BEAMSA A 1/4" CARBON STEEL BULLETIN BOARD HOUSINGTHREADED BOLT A, SIZE TBD#4 REBAR, 12" O.C. EACH WAY, 3" CLEAR MINIMUM, TYPICAL8" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASENATIVE SUBGRADE213456781011FRONT ELEVATIONSIDE ELEVATION APLAN VIEWTHREADED BOLT B, SIZE TBDTHREADED BOLT C, SIZE TBD1/4" CARBON STEEL BASE PLATEPOURED IN PLACE CONRETE FOOTING, SIZE TBD9121/4" CUSTOM CARBON STEEL ESCUTCHEONBULLETIN BOARD MATERIAL AND BACKING213456789101112THREADED BOLT D, SIZE TBD13133'-0"3'-0" 8'-0" 2" 1" 2"2"4" 6"1'-6"3'-0"1'-0" TYP 6" TYP5" TYP4" TYP3'-0"67898" TYP 1" TYP 2"6"4"2"4"2"4"6" 2"4" 4"213571121345101112132" BB SIDE ELEVATION B6789214510111213CARBON STEEL PANEL WITH LASERCUT LETTERING1414146'-9" 7"7"3'-9"3 1/2"14AS NOTED3809/17/19 98 of 132 zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L16CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND MATERIALS LISTMATERIALS LISTPEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING: SHALL BE NATURAL GREY WITH LIGHT BROOM FINISH, SCORED PER PLAN.PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WITH STAMP A: SHALL BE DAVIS INTEGRAL COLOR LIGHT GRAY WITH MEDIUM BROOMFINISH, STAMPED WITH MATCRETE 'GARDEN STONE' OR APPROVED EQUAL, WITH 1/4" MAXIMUM RELIEF.VEHICULAR CONCRETE WITH STAMP B: SHALL BE DAVIS INTEGRAL COLOR SANDSTONE WITH MEDIUM BROOMFINISH, MATCRETE 'ITALIAN SLATE RUNNING BOND' STAMP OR APPROVED EQUAL, WITH 3/16" MAXIMUM RELIEF.CONCRETE HEADER: SHALL BE NATURAL GREY WITH SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH.EXPANSION JOINT: ASPHALTIC FELT MATERIAL WITH MASTIC FILL. MASTIC COLOR TO MATCH CONCRETE.SPLIT RAIL FENCE: RAILS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTION GRADE WESTERN RED CEDAR, APPLY 2 COATSWATERPROOF WOOD SEALER FOR WESTERN RED CEDAR. POSTS SHALL BE PRESSURE-TREATED WOOD.LANDSCAPE WALL: SHALL BE NATURAL GREY WITH BOARDFORM FINISH, DIMENSIONS PER DETAIL.PRIMARY TRAILHEAD SIGN:- POSTS SHALL BE GLUE-LAMINATED TIMBER- CARBON STEEL SHALL HAVE SPECKLED POWDERCOAT FINISH SIMILAR IN APPEARANCE TOCORTEN STEEL.SECONDARY TRAILHEAD SIGN:- POSTS SHALL BE GLUE-LAMINATED TIMBER- CARBON STEEL SHALL HAVE SPECKLED POWDERCOAT FINISH SIMILAR IN APPEARANCE TOCORTEN STEEL.SPECIMEN STONES:SHALL BE SIZED AS FOLLOWSSHALL BE BOUQUET CANYON OR APPROVED EQUAL, 3x4 FEET, H=2' MIN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE.SHALL BE HOOKER CREEK OR APPROVED EQUAL, 2x3 FEET, H=18" MIN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE.SHALL BE HOOKER CREEK OR APPROVED EQUAL, 1-1/2x2 FEET, H=12" MIN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE.LANDSCAPE NOTESCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE INSTALLATIONOF ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THESPECIFICATIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID ANDPRIOR TO COMMENCING INSTALLATION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST, THEY SHOULD BEBROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND STAKING ALL SEWER, WATER ANDUTILITY LINES ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE THAT MIGHT BE DAMAGED AS A RESULT OFCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANYCOST INCURRED FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF AFOREMENTIONED UTILITIESDAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.DEVIATIONS BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TOTHE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS OTHERWISE, ALL MATERIALS DESIGNATED FOR REMOVALSHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE.COSTS INCURRED DUE TO REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTSWHICH ARE DESIGNATED "TO BE PROTECTED" OR "TO REMAIN" WHICH ARE DAMAGED AS A RESULTOF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS OTHERWISE, MATERIALS TO BE PURCHASED ANDFURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE NEW.CONCRETE INDICATED FOR SAWCUTTING AND REMOVAL SHALL BE CUT TO A TRUE LINE WITHNEATLY SAWED EDGES. IF A SAWCUT IS WITHIN THREE FEET (3') OF AN EXISTING EXPANSION ORCONTROL JOINT, CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED TO THAT NEAREST JOINT.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, MANUFACTURER'S CUT OR DATA SHEETS FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE OWNER'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR SUCH FURNISHEDMATERIALS.ABANDONED PIPES SHALL BE CAPPED OR PLUGGED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE OWNER'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.213AS NOTEDSTAMP BSTAMP A3909/17/19 99 of 132 zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L17IRRIGATION NOTES AND LEGENDAS NOTEDON GRADE TREE BUBBLER20-75 PSITORO FB-25-PC MOUNTED ON FLEX TUBE WITH TORO SHRUBADAPTERS IN QUANTITIES AS FOLLOWS: 2 PER 15 GALLON OR 24" BOXTREE, 4 PER 36" BOX AND LARGER TREENOTE:INSTALL TORO DL2000 PERMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONSFOR GROUND COVER & SHRUB AREAS:DL2000 DRIPLINE SPACING =12"EMITTER SPACING =12"FLOW RATE =0.53 GPH12" DRIP ON-GRADETORO DL2000TORO DL-2000 SERIES (RGP-212-10)40 PSIBUBBLERSMODELMPFVDRIPZONE VALVE KIT INC. REMOTE CONTROLVALVE, PRESSURE REGULATOR & FILTER FORDRIP AND TREE BUBBLER VALVESIRRITROL 1" 700 ULTRAFLOW IN-LINE DRIP ZONE VALVE KITMODEL: DKZ-700 (0.10-30 GPM)1" QUICK COUPLER VALVE WITHYELLOW VINYL COVERTORO FCH-H-FIPT, MINIMUM ONE PER VALVETORO DL-MP9 MINIMUM ONE PER VALVETORO YD-500-34 MINIMUM ONE PER VALVESPRAY, ROTOR, AND BUBBLER VALVESDRIP TUBING VALVESGALLONS PER MINUTE THROUGH VALVECONTROL VALVE SIZECONTROLLER STATION NUMBERZONE TYPE, IF APPLICABLELENGTH OF DRIP TUBING, IF APPLICABLEIRRIGATION LEGENDDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLPVC BALL VALVEWATER METERFLUSH VALVE FOR DL2000 SYSTEMOPERATION INDICATOR FOR DRIP SYSTEMAIR VACUUM RELIEF VALVE FOR DRIP SYSTEMMASTER VALVEPRESSURE REGULATORNONPRESSURE IRRIGATION SUPPLYLINE-3/4" MIN.PRESSURE SUPPLY MAINLINESLEEVE: 2x ENCLOSED PIPE DIAMETER OR ASINDICATEDCONTROLLER STATION NUMBERGALLONS PER MINUTE THROUGH VALVECONTROL VALVE SIZEFLOW SENSOREXISTING IRRIGATION WATER METER TO REMAIN, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION ANDCURRENT CONDITION WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.MANUFACTURER/MODEL/SIZETORO 100-2SLVC (2 PIECE, 1" SINGLE LUG, WITH YELLOW VINYL COVER)LINE SIZE WILKINS MODEL 500-HLR-P INCLUDE PRESSURE GAUGE,INSTALL IF PRESSURE AT P.O.C. EXCEEDS 90 PSIIF ONE DOES NOT EXIST OR IS NOT WORKING PER CITY AND STATE INSTALL:GRISWOLD 2160, NORMALLY OPEN VALVE, LINE SIZEDRIPSCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE NONPRESSURE DRIP IRRIGATION LATERAL,SIZED PER PIPE SIZING CHARTCLASS 200 PVC PIPE1120 SCHD. 40 PVC PIPE FOR SIZES 1-1/2" AND SMALLER1120 CLASS 315 PVC PIPE FOR SIZES 2" AND LARGER1120/SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPEOPERATINGPRESSUREMODELOPERATINGPRESSUREMODEL#GPMX"XXXX'X"GPM#CENTERFEEDREQUIRED DRIP EQUIPMENT NOT GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED ON PLANS:(INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.)DRIP TUBE FITTINGSTORO TRI-LOC FITTINGSNIBCO PVC BALL VALVE 4660-S OR EQUAL, LINE SIZEDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONIF ONE DOES NOT EXIST OR IS NOT WORKING PER CITY AND STATE INSTALL: IRRITROL PVCFLOW SENSOR SIZE PER LINE SIZE.MODELS: FS-10/15/20 (FS-10 FOR 1" LINE, FS-15 FOR 1-1/2" LINE, AND FS-20 FOR 2" LINE.)FLOW SENSOR SHIELDED CABLE: EV-CAB-SEN (FLOW SENSOR SHIELDED CABLE SHALL NEVERBE CLOSE TO HIGH VOLTAGE WIRES. USE SEPARATE CONDUIT FOR FLOW SENSOR WIRE.)BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE ANDSECURE ENCLOSUREIRRIGATION LINES ANDSLEEVESWEATHER SENSORINSTALLATION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS, SEE DETAILS FOR MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS:1. INSTALL ON ROOF EVE OR GUTTER (PREFERRED)2. MOUNT TO 12' TALL PRESSURE TREATED POST WITH REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING INOPEN LOCATION PER DIRECTION OF SITE SUPERINTENDENTIATBD -CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IF SITE IS ON ONE OR MULTIPLECONTROLLERSWALL MOUNT ET BASED ELECTRIC IRRIGATIONCONTROLLERWIRELESS WEATHER SENSING KIT (CL-100-WIRELESS). INSTALL CLIMATELOGIC MODULE IN ENCLOSURE CABINET PER DETAIL.W1.CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE EXISTING MAINLINES AND IRRIGATION SLEEVES WHENEVER POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2.DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL THE OFFSETS AND FITTINGS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN A PLANTING AREA WHEREVERPOSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY TO CONFORM TO ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.3.EQUIPMENT INCLUDING MAIN, LATERALS, AND VALVES SHOWN GRAPHICALLY IN HARDSCAPE AREAS ARE FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTED AREAS AT A REASONABLE, REACHABLE DISTANCE FROMHARDSCAPE OR TURF AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL WIRE AND PIPE UNDER HARDSCAPE AREAS IN SEPERATE P.V.C. SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE PIPING AND SLEEVING LOCATION PRIOR TO HARDSCAPE INSTALLATION. SLEEVING SHALL BEINSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, CONTROL WIRES SHALL OCCUPY THE SAME TRENCH AS PIPES. EACH CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE AN INDEPENDENT GROUND WIRE.5."I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM ACCORDINGLY FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE IRRIGATION DESIGN PLAN." INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE CODESAND ORDINANCES.6.THE EXISTING WATER PRESSURE AT THE PROPOSED WATER METER LOCATION IS UNKNOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WATER PRESSURE IS ADEQUATE FOR THE SYSTEM AS DESIGNED. IF ANY DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN DESIGN ANDACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING FOR A DECISION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE INSTALLATION.9.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE AND EFFECTIVE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING AREAS. DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL PLANTMATERIAL RECEIVES AS MUCH WATER AS IS NECESSARY FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND TO SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH ALL LINES AND ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. COSTS INCURRED DUE TO ANY ADJUSTMENTS FOR 100% COVERAGE, INCLUDING THOSEREQUESTED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH THE LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION OF THE PLANT MATERIAL TO ENSURE THAT THERE WILL BE COMPLETE AND UNIFORM IRRIGATION COVERAGE OF PLANTING. THEIRRIGATION LAYOUT SHALL BE CHECKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE IF ANY CHANGES, DELETIONS, OR ADDITIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALLBE INSTALLED AND TESTED PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANT MATERIALS.12.TRENCHING DEPTHS FOR IRRIGATION PIPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: MAIN = 24", ALL LATERALS = 12". ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3" SAND ENVELOPE AROUND ALL MAINLINE PIPE.13.MINIMUM LATERAL SIZE SHALL BE 3/4". SEE PIPE SIZING CHART FOR SIZING.14.IF SETTLEMENT OCCURS ALONG TRENCHES AND ADJUSTMENT(S) TO PIPES, VALVES, OR HEADS IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR, AS PART OF WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT, SHALL MAKE ALL ADJUSTMENTS WITHOUT EXTRA COSTS TO THE OWNER.15.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FILL AND REPAIR ALL DEPRESSIONS AND REPLACE ALL NECESSARY LAWN AND/OR PLANTING DUE TO THE SETTLEMENT OF IRRIGATION FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTED COMPLETION OFMAINTENANCE.16.CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THAT ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND WORKMANSHIP FURNISHED BY HIM BE FREE OF DEFECTS FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTED COMPLETION OF MAINTENANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FORREPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF FAILED MATERIAL DURING THIS GUARANTEE PERIOD.17.ALL PLASTIC FITTINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18" APART TO FACILITATE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF INDIVIDUAL FITTINGS.18.SPLICING OF 24 VOLT WIRES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED EXCEPT IN VALVE BOXES. CONTRACTOR TO LEAVE A 24" COIL OF EXCESS WIRE AT EACH SPLICE AND EVERY 100' ON CENTER ALONG WIRE RUN. TAPE WIRE BUNDLES 10' ON CENTER. NO TAPINGWILL BE PERMITTED INSIDE SLEEVES. WIRE CONNECTORS SHALL BE SCOTCH DBY OR APPROVED EQUAL, INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.19.CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE SIZED AS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN VALVE BOXES AS INDICATED IN THE DETAILS. BOXES SHALL BE SET FLUSH WITH THE FINISH GRADE OR SURFACE AND PERMANENTLY MARKED ASINDICATED IN THE DETAILS.20.EXACT LOCATION OF CONTROLLERS TO BE DETERMINED AT JOB SITE BY PROJECT MANAGER. USE THIN WALL METAL CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE AND IN GARAGES. PAINT ALL CONDUIT TO MATCH BUILDING OR WALL COLOR. USE WATERPROOFCONNECTIONS FOR OUTDOOR INSTALLATION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. SEAL ALL CONDUIT HOLES WITH SILICONE OR EQUAL. PROGRAM CONTROLLER TO IRRIGATE USING MULTIPLE REPEAT CYCLES OF SHORT DURATION.CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT RUNOFF OF WATER AND SLOPE/SOIL EROSION DUE TO PROLONGED APPLICATIONS OF WATER.21.CONTROL WIRES SHALL BE 14 GAUGE (RED). SEPARATE WIRES SHALL RUN FROM THE CONTROLLER TO EACH VALVE. COMMON GROUND WIRES SHALL BE 12 GAUGE (WHITE) ALL CONTROL WIRES LEADING FROM VALVES TO CONTROLLER SHALL BELOOPED-UP A MINIMUM OF 30" INTO EVERY VALVE BOX INTERCEPTED ON THE WAY TO THE CONTROLLER.22.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONTROLLER POWER HOOK-UP WITH PROJECT ELECTRICIAN. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS PORTION OF WORK WITH THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS.23.EXISTING BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND TESTING TO THE EXTENT MANDATED BY LOCAL BUILDING CODE.24.BUBBLERS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TREES.25.ALL WATER TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING PER LOCAL BUILDING CODE.26.DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEENCONSIDERED IN THE ENGINEERING. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OF DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. IN THE EVENT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTORSHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY.27.A LAMINATED, COLOR CODED, REDUCED SIZE IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE OWNER AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE. PLACE ANOTHER LAMINATED COPY INSIDE THE CONTROLLER CABINET DOOR.28.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING MAINLINE AND CONTROLLER WIRE FOR FUTURE USE.29.IF THE INTENT IS TO DEMO ANY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN NEW CONSTRUCTION AREA, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL NEW MAINLINE AND CONTROLLER WIRE TO NEW REMOTE CONTROL VALVE AS DESIGNED PER THIS PLAN, TYPICAL.30.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DRIPLINE ON SLOPES PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS WITH 25% INCREASED SPACING AT BOTTOM 1/3 OF SLOPE.31.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL LATERAL LINE CHECK VALVES WHERE NECESSARY TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. MODEL SHALL BE NDS FLO CONTROL SPRING CHECK VALVE RATED TO 200PSI, MODEL 1790 (SLIPxSLIP CONNECTION WITH UNION), LINESIZE OR APPROVED EQUAL.32.CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AN IRRIGATION AUDIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL WELO AND TITLE 23 DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES SECTION 492.12: IRRIGATION AUDIT, IRRIGATION SURVEY, AND IRRIGATION WATER USE ANALYSIS PRIOR TOPROJECT ACCEPTANCE.33.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AS REQUIRED TO THE LOCAL REVIEWING AGENCY. SEE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 23 WATERS DIVISION 2 DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER 2.7 MODELWATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE APPENDIX C.34.SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AND SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED PER THE REPORT. PHYSICAL COPIES OF THE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CLIENT, PROJECTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND LOCAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL CONFORM TO STATE AB1881 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE OR AGENCY ADOPTED WELO.35.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAND WATERING INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING AREAS DURING PLANT ESTABLISHMENT: BIO-CELL AREAS, SODDED AREAS. THESE AREAS WILL NEED SUPPLEMENTAL HAND WATERING IF THEYARE IRRIGATED BY DRIP UNTIL ROOTS ARE ESTABLISHED AS DRIP IRRIGATION MAY NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WATER TO THESE AREAS FOR HEALTHY PLANT ESTABLISHMENT.36.ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL REMAIN OPERATIONAL DURING CONSTRUCTION WHERE PRACTICAL. IF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE SHUT OFF FOR PERIODS OF TIME LONGER THAN THREE DAYS A HAND WATERING MAINTENANCEPROGRAM SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TO MAINTAIN CURRENT PLANT HEALTH. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY DEAD OR DECLINING PLANT MATERIAL DUE TO LACK OF WATERING. ALL EXISTING MAINLINE, CONTROL WIRES,LATERAL LINES, SPRAY HEADS, DRIP TUBING OR OTHER IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDAMAGED. IF MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM NEED TO TAKE PLACE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR, REPLACE OR ADDNEW EQUIPMENT AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN PROPER COVERAGE AND WATER DISTRIBUTION FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS. ANY UNUSED CONTROL WIRES RESULTING IN THE RETROFIT SHALL BE PUT IN A NEW VALVE BOX AND LABELED. UPDATE THECONTROLLER SCHEDULE TO INDICATE THAT THESE VALVE STATIONS ARE NO LONGER IN USE. IRRIGATION NOTESPIPE SIZING CHARTFLOW RATE(GPM)PIPE SIZE(DIAMETER)0 TO 9.75"9.1 TO 181"18.1 TO 301.25"30.1 TO 401.5"40.1 TO 602"60.1 TO 702.5"MAXIMUMNUMBER OFWIRESCONDUIT & SLEEVE SIZING GUIDEMINIMUMCONDUIT SIZE(SCH 40 PIPE)MAXIMUM LATERALOR MAINLINE PIPESIZEMINIMUM SLEEVESIZE REQUIRED(SCH 40 PIPE)>505035256"4"4"-6"8"3"3"6"2-1/2"2" TO 2-1/2"4"8171242"3/4"1-1/4"2"1-1/2"3"1-1/2"1" TO 1-1/4"2-1/2"1-1/2"1/2"1"EXISTING BACKFLOW TO REMAIN, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION AND CURRENT CONDITION INFIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF ONE DOES NOT EXIST OR IS NOT WORKING PER CITY ANDSTATE STANDARDS INSTALL - LINE SIZE, FEBCO 825Y- OR APPROVED EQUAL.4009/17/19 100 of 132 DCCCCCDADDAABBBCCDR/WR/W PACIFICA DRIVETORRE AVENUE KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L18( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010EXISTING PLANTING AND TURF TOREMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIRAND REPLACE IF DAMAGED, TYPICAL.EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK, CURB,AND GUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.PLANTING PLANTREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'4109/17/19 101 of 132 R/WR/WR/WPACIFICA DRIVEKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.EXISTING WATER METERS ANDBACKFLOW TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L19( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010PLANTING PLANTRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.EXISTING PLANTING AND TURF TOREMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIRAND REPLACE IF DAMAGED, TYPICAL.EXISTING DRIVEWAYAPPROACH TO REMAIN.EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK, CURB,AND GUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.TREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'NO WORK THIS SHEET4209/17/19 102 of 132 R/W R/W R/W R/W KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.RAILING, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L20( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010TRAIL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.EXISTING PARKING TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.PLANTING PLANTREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'NO WORK THIS SHEET4309/17/19 103 of 132 DDDDCCCCAADCCCCAAAR/ W R/WR/WR/WRODRIGUES AVENUEKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.EXISTING UTILITIESTO REMAIN, TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L21( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010EXISTING STORMWATER OUTLETTO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING DRIVEWAYAPPROACH TO REMAIN.EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK, CURB, ANDGUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.PLANTING PLAN4AES CAL24" BOXTREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.4409/17/19 104 of 132 STOPSTOP R/WR/WR/WR/WSOUTH BLANEY AVENUE KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.CROSSWALK MARKINGS, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L22( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010PLANTING PLANEXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACHTO REMAIN, TYPICAL.RRFB, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.CURB RAMP AND TRUNCATED DOMES,SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS, TYPICAL.EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB ANDGUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.TREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'RAILING, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.NO WORK THIS SHEET4509/17/19 105 of 132 DDDDDDDDDDDDCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBR/W R/WKEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING TREE TOREMAIN.EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVEAREA (ESA), TYPICAL.EXISTING WATER METER TO VERIFYIN FIELD AND REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING BASEBALL FIELDFENCE TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING CONCRETEPICNIC AREA WITHBARBECUE TO REMAIN.BRIDGE, SEE STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.TRAIL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L23( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010EXISTING TURF TO REMAIN.CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANDREPLACE IF DAMAGED, TYPICAL.EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOXES TOVERIFY IN FIELD AND REMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING AC WALKWAYREMAIN, TYPICAL.PLANTING PLAN2AES CAL24" BOX1QUE AGR36" BOXTREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'4609/17/19 106 of 132 STOPR/WR/W( In Feet )1 inch = 10 feetGRAPHIC SCALE4020105010PLANTING PLANEAST EST A T E S D R I V E KEY MAPPACIFICA DRTORRE AVE S. BLANEY AVE E. ES T A T E S D R RODRIGUES AVE.L18L19L20L21L22L23L24EXISTING FENCE TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREA (ESA),TYPICAL.TRAIL, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L24EXISTING OVERHEADPOWERLINES TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB ANDGUTTER PAN TO REMAIN, TYPICAL.PROPOSED CROSSWALK MARKINGS,SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS, TYPICAL.RRFB, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS,TYPICAL.EXISTING BICYCLE TRAIL TOREMAIN, TYPICAL.TREE LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLSHRUB LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLGROUNDCOVER LEGENDBOTANICAL NAMESYMBOLAES CALQUE AGRAESCULUS CALIFORNICAQUERCUS AGRIFOLIAARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSVERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'ADCBNOTES:1.SEE SHEET L25 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES.2.SEE SHEET L26 FOR PLANTING DETAILS.1" = 10'RAILING, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS, TYPICAL.NO WORK THIS SHEET4709/17/19 107 of 132 zuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L25PLANTING NOTES AND LEGENDPLANTING PLAN NOTESCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND INSTALL PLANTMATERIAL AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS OTHERWISE, STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS AND HARDSCAPE SHALL BEINSTALLED PRIOR TO PLANTING OPERATIONS.PLANT LIST ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE USED AS A GUIDE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEOFF AND VERIFY SIZES ANDQUANTITIES BY PLAN CHECK.A SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AND SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BEFOLLOWED PER THE REPORT. PHYSICAL COPIES OF THE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CLIENT,PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND LOCAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. THE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL CONFORMTO STATE AB1881 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (WELO) OR LOCAL AGENCY ADOPTED WELO. CONTRACTORSHALL OBTAIN A SOILS MANAGEMENT REPORT AFTER GRADING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION.SAMPLES OF FERTILIZERS, ORGANIC AMENDMENT, SOIL CONDITIONERS, AND SEED SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TOINCORPORATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE A CERTIFICATE OFCOMPLIANCE FOR SUCH FURNISHED MATERIALS.ALL WORK ON THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, INCLUDING HYDROSTATIC, COVERAGE, AND OPERATIONAL TESTS AND THEBACKFILLING AND COMPACTION OF TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO PLANTING OPERATIONS.LOCATIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REVIEWED ON SITE BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NO CLOSER THAN TEN FEET (10') FROM UTILITIES.TREES PLANTED WITHIN FIVE FEET (5') OF HARDSCAPE OR STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A ROOT BARRIER ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ARBORIST AT XXX-XXX-XXXX TO VERIFY SPECIES (EVEN IF SHOWNON THE PLANS), LOCATIONS, AND QUANTITIES OF ALL STREET TREES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIAL. IF STREET TREESARE TO BE PLANTED IN TREE WELLS, FINAL LOCATION OF TREE WELLS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ARBORIST PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK.ALL PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE 3" THICK BARK MULCH LAYER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAMPLE OF PROPOSEDBARK MULCH FOR APPROVAL. BARK MULCH SHALL BE LYNGSO SMALL FIR BARK (3/4" TO 1-1/2") OR APPROVED EQUAL.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SELECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSIZ60.1)FOR STANDARD FORM TREES, CALIPER SIZE SHALL BE MEASURED 6" ABOVE THE SOIL LINE FOR CALIPERS EQUAL TO ORLESS THAN 4" FOR CALIPERS GREATER THAN 4", CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURES 12" ABOVE THE SOIL LINE. FORMULTI-TRUNK TREES THE CALIPER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY TAKING THE AVERAGE OF THE CALIPER OF THE TWOLARGEST TRUNKS. CALIPER IS MEASURED 6” ABOVE ORIGINATION POINT OF THE SECOND LARGEST TRUNK OR 6” ABOVE GROUND IF ALLTRUNKS ORIGINATE FROM THE SOIL.CALIPER SIZES STANDARDS:15 GALLON: 0.75-1.25"24" BOX: 1.25-2"36" BOX: 2-3.5"48" BOX: 3.5-5"60" BOX: 4-6"WATER NEEDS CATEGORY BASED ON WUCOLS IV (JANUARY 2014) LANDSCAPE COEFFICIENT METHOD:CATEGORYPERCENTAGE OF ETo(H) HIGH:0.7-0.9(M) MEDIUM:0.4-0.6(L) LOW:0.1-0.3(VL) VERY LOW:<0.1PROPOSED PLANT PALETTETREES24" BOXCALIFORNIA BUCKEYE20'X20'AESCULUS CALIFORNICA6SYMBOLQTY.BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEMINIMUMCONTAINER SIZEHxWWUCOLSAES CALVL36" BOXVALLEY OAK50'X40'QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA1QUE AGRVLSHRUBS1 GALLONYARROW2'X2'ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 'SENTINAL'26LGOLD VELVET KANGAROO PAW5'X3'ANIGOZANTHOS 'GOLD VELVET'25LSENTINAL MANZANITA5'X5'DIANELLA 'COOLVISTA'14LCOOLVISTA DIANELLA2'X2'ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM CALIFORNICA36LDEER GRASS4'X4'MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS31LPURPLE CEDROS ISLAND VERBENA2'X3'VERBENA LILACINA 'DE LA MINA'22LGROUNDCOVERYANKEE POINT CEANOTHUS36" O.C.CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS VAR. GRISEUS'YANKEE POINT'LSPACING5 GALLON5 GALLON1 GALLON5 GALLON1 GALLON1 GALLONADCBAS NOTED(96"L 24"W 36"H)ALUMINUM 17 (S)OLDTOWN FIBERGLASSRL962436 WITHINTERNAL RESERVOIRAND DRAIN, ORAPPROVED EQUALPLANT ONE ROW OF THREE (3) RHAMNUS CALIFORNIA 'TRANQUILMARGARITA' EVENLY-SPACED, 36" ON-CENTER, IN EACH PLANTER.POTTERY LEGENDSYMBOLMODEL NUMBER/MANUFACTURERCOLOR/FINISHSIZE/DIMENSIONSPLANTING(S)/FILL WITH4809/17/19 108 of 132 ACBzuzu SHEET OF REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13 2019CJTCJTWBSWBS63L26PLANTING DETAILSNOTES:1. ALL PLANTS TO BE PLANTED AT EQUALSPACING "TRIANGULATED" UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLANS.2. INFILL PLANTS AS REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN SPACING AT IRREGULAR EDGES.EQUALEQUALEQ U A L EQUAL1/2 PLANT SPACING PLUS 6"GROUNDCOVER SPACINGSCALE: N.T.S.EDGE OF PLANTING AREATYPICAL PLANT SPACING VARIES SEEPLANTING LEGEND AND PLANS.2112NOTES:1. SEE PLANTING SPECIFCATIONS PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS.2. ROOTBALL CROWN TO BE 1" ABOVEFINISH GRADE.A SHALLOW BASIN 2" DEEP SHALL BEFORMED AROUND ROOTBALL BELOWFINISH GRADEFINISH GRADENATIVE GRADE OR CERTIFIEDCOMPACTED SUBGRADEAPPROVED BACKFILL, THOROUGHLYMIXED PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONAGRIFORM PLANT TABLETS 2 PER 1GALLON, 3 PER 5 AND 15 GALLON2X DIAMETEROF ROOTBALLDEPTH OF ROOTBALL SHRUB-SEE PLAN AND LEGEND FORSIZE AND TYPE6"FOOT TAMP BASESHRUB PLANTINGSCALE: N.T.S.CL12345671253647NOTES:1. SEE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS.2. THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO 15 GALLON AND24" BOX TREES.3. ROOTBALL CROWN TO EXTEND 1" ABOVEFINISH GRADE.4. TREES INSTALLED WITHIN TURF AREASSHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 'ARBOR-GARD'AT BASE OF TRUNK.2" DIAMETER TREATED LODGE POLE PINESTAKE PLACED ON WINDWARD SIDES OFTREE, AND OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALLA SHALLOW BASIN 2" DEEP SHALL BE FORMEDAROUND ROOTBALL BELOW FINISH GRADE.TREES PLANTED IN TURF SHALL NOT HAVEBASINS.FINISH GRADENATIVE GRADEAPPROVED BACKFILL, THOROUGHLY MIXEDPRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PUDDLE ANDSETTLE PRIOR TO PLANTING TREE.ROOTBALLAGRIFORM PLANT TABLETS 3 PER 15 GALLON,6 PER 24" BOX AND 8 FOR 36" BOXCINCH TIE OR APPROVED EQUALTREE-SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND TYPEPLANPREVAILINGWINDS2X DIAMETEROF ROOTBALLDEPTH OFROOTBALL6"FOOT TAMP BASETREE STAKING (DOUBLE)SCALE: N.T.S.101323165781033212349987654321AS NOTED4909/17/19 109 of 132 THVFTHVF THVF THVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE BELOWWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANWPC01PACIFICA DRTORRE AVEMATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC02 LEGENDFIBER ROLLINLET PROTECTION - TYPE 4ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREA (ESA)TEMPORARY HIGH VISIBILITY FENCETHVFDETAILSHEET NUMBERA3DETAIL CALLOUT5009/17/19 110 of 132 THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08THVF THVF THVF THVF THVF THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC01 MAT C H L I N E - S E E B E L O WMATCH LINE - SEE ABOVEMATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC03RODRIGUES AVEWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANWPC025109/17/19 111 of 132 THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH L INE - SEE BELOW MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC02 DE PALMA LNMATCH LINE - SEE ABOVE MATCH L I N E - S E E S H E E T W P C 0 4 S BLANEY AVE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANWPC035209/17/19 112 of 132 THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC03 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC05WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANWPC045309/17/19 113 of 132 THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08211111333333222zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC04 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC06WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANWPC055409/17/19 114 of 132 THVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVFTHVF2WCP075WCP08zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET WPC05 E ESTATES DRWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANWPC065509/17/19 115 of 132 zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF N.T.S.ENCROACHMENT DETAILN.T.S.FIBER ROLL INSTALLATION3/4" x 3/4" WOOD STAKES MAX4" SPACING4" MAX12" MIN2" MINFIBER ROLL 8" MIN4' MAX4' MAX4' MAX4' MAXNOTE:INSTALL FIBER ROLL ALONG A LEVELCONTOURFIBER ROLLSINSTALL FIBER ROLL NEAR SLOPEWHERE IT TRANSITIONS INTO ASTEEPER SLOPECONCRETEWASHOUT4"2"1/8" DIA. STEEL WIREPLANN.T.S.CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN OR EQUIVALENTN.T.S.SECTION B-BN.T.S.STAPLE DETAILN.T.S.BB10' MIN.VARIES10 MIL PLASTIC LININGSTAKE TYP.STRAW BALE TYP.TYPE "ABOVE GRADE" STRAW BALESBLACK LETTERS 6" HEIGHTPLYWOOD 48"x24" PAINTED WHITE0.5" LAG SCREWSWOOD POST 3"x3"x8'NOTES:1. ACTUAL LAYOUT DETERMINED IN FIELD2. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN SHALL BEINSTALLED WITHIN 30 FT. OF THETEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUTFACILITYSTAPLES (2 PER BALE)10 MIL PLASTIC LININGSTRAW BALEWOOD OR METAL STAKES(2 PER BALE)NATIVE MATERIAL (OPTIONAL)BINDING WIRECRUSHED AGGREGATE GREATER THAT 3" BUTSMALLER THAN 6"50' MIN.OR FOUR TIMES THE CIRCUMFERENCEOF THE LARGEST CONSTRUCTIONVEHICLE TIRE, WHICHEVER ISGREATER10' MIN OR AS REQUIRED TOACCOMMODATEANTICIPATEDTRAFFIC, WHICHEVERBBSECTION B-BEXISTING PAVED ROADWAY DITCH FILTER FABRIC-12" MIN. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDBY SOILS ENGINEERR= 2 0 ' M IN .ORIGINAL GRADEN.T.S.MATCH EXISTING GRADEIS GREATER.24' MIN.NOTE:CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT BARRIERAND CHANNELIZE RUNOFF TOSEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE-12" MIN. UNLESSOTHERWISE SPECIFIEDBY SOILS ENGINEERCORRUGATED STEEL PANELSFILTER FABRICORIGINAL GRADECRUSHED AGGREGATE GREATER THAT 3" BUTSMALLER THAN 6"SECTION A-AN.T.S.CORRUGATED STEEL PANELSSEDIMENT TRAPPINGDEVICEAANOTES:1. INTENDED FOR SHORT TERM USE2. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTION3. PERFORM MAINTENANCE PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONTEMPORARYGEOTEXTILEINSERTWIDTH = WLENGTH = LDEPTH = DFILTER FABRICMAINTENANCE NOTES1. MAINTENANCE IS TO BE PERFORMED AS FOLLOWS:A. REPAIR DAMAGES CAUSED BY SOIL EROSION OR CONSTRUCTION AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.B. SWALES SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND MAINTAINED AS NEEDED.C. SEDIMENT TRAPS, BERMS, AND SWALES ARE TO BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH STORM AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED.D. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND SEDIMENT TRAP RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS WHEN SEDIMENT HASACCUMULATED TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT.E. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM TRAP SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN A SUITABLE AREA AND IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT WILL NOTERODE.F. RILLS AND GULLIES MUST BE REPAIRED.2. SAND BAG INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE CLEANED OUT WHENEVER SEDIMENT DEPTH IS ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF ONESAND BAG.1. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONAND TO KEEP THE ENTIRE SITE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN.2. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR INTERIM EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE USEDFOR FINAL ELEVATIONS OR PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS.3. CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT TO THE CITY MONTHLY (AT THE FIRST OF EACH MONTH BETWEEN OCT 1ST AND APRIL 30TH)CERTIFICATIONS THAT ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT MEASURES IDENTIFIED ON THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANARE IN PLACE. IF MEASURES ARE NOT IN PLACE, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A WRITTENEXPLANATION OF WHY THE MEASURE IS NOT IN PLACE AND WHAT WILL BE DONE TO REMEDY THIS SITUATION.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING WATER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR, DURING, ANDAFTER STORM EVENTS.5. REASONABLE CARE SHALL BE TAKEN WHEN HAULING ANY EARTH, SAND, GRAVEL, STONE, DEBRIS, PAPER OR ANYOTHER SUBSTANCE OVER ANY PUBLIC STREET, ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE. SHOULD ANY BLOW, SPILL, OR TRACKOVER AND UPON SAID PUBLIC OR ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, IMMEDIATE REMEDY SHALL OCCUR.6. SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE.7. DURING THE RAINY SEASON, ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF EARTH MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THE SITESHALL BE MAINTAINED SO AS TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INCLUDINGEXISTING DRAINAGE SWALES AND WATER COURSES.8. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WATER POLLUTION WILL BE MINIMIZED.STATE AND LOCAL LAWS CONCERNING POLLUTION ABATEMENT SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DUST CONTROL AS REQUIRED BY THE APPROPRIATE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCALAGENCY REQUIREMENTS.WATER POLLUTION CONTROL NOTESWATER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES1. THE FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE DESIGNED TO CONTROL WATER POLLUTION DURING THE RAINY SEASON,OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 30. FACILITIES ARE TO BE OPERABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15 OF ANY YEAR. GRADINGOPERATIONS DURING THE RAINY SEASON WHICH LEAVE DENUDED SLOPES SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING GRADING ON THE SLOPES. DURING THE NON-RAINY SEASON BESTMANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) MUST BE IMPLEMENTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOTLIMITED TO: STABALIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TIRE WASH AREA AND INLET PROTECTION.2. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING. CONTRACTOR SHALLMAINTAIN STABILIZED ENTRANCE AT EACH VEHICLE ACCESS POINT TO EXISTING PAVED STREETS. ANY MUD OR DEBRISTRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED DAILY AND AS REQUIRED BE THE CITY.3. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT OPEN INLETS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE STORM DRAINSYSTEM. INLETS NOT USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH EROSION CONTROL ARE TO BE BLOCKED TO PREVENT ENTRY OFSEDIMENT.4. THIS WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN MAY NOT COVER ALL THE SITUATIONS THAT MAY ARISE DURINGCONSTRUCTION DUE TO UNANTICIPATED FIELD CONDITIONS. VARIATIONS AND ADDITIONS MAY BE MADE TO THIS PLANIN THE FIELD. NOTIFY THE CITY REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY FIELD CHANGES.BMP SUMMARY TABLEBMP CATEGORYBMP USEDEROSION CONTROLSCHEDULING, PRESERVATION OF EXISTING VEGETATIONSEDIMENT CONTROLFIBER ROLLS, STREET SWEEPING, STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION,CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXITGOOD SITE MANAGEMENTMATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE, MATERIAL USE, STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT,SPILL PRESERVATION AND CONTROL, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, HAZARDOUSWASTE, CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENT, SANITARY-SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENTNON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENTPAVING AND GRINDING OPERATION, ILLICIT CONNECTION-ILLEGAL DISCHARGECONNECTIONRUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROLFIBER ROLLS, SANDBAGSACTIVE TREATMENT SYSTEMS NOT APPLICABLESTORM DRAIN INLETPROTECTIONCONTROLSTABILIZEDENTRANCEMAINTENANCE SCHEDULECONSTRUCTIONWEEKLY & AFTER EACH RAININSPECTION FREQUENCYWEEKLY & AFTER EACH RAINREMOVE GRAVEL AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITED ON PAVED ROADWAYS WITHIN 24 HOURSREPLACE GRAVEL MATERIAL WHEN VOIDS ARE PRESENTREMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE FILTERREPLACE CLOGGED FILTER FABRIC IMMEDIATELYMAINTENANCE/REPAIR MEASURESFIBER ROLLSREMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLLSREPAIR WHENEVER STRAW ROLL IS DAMAGEDESPECIALLY IF HEAVY RAINS ARE EXPECTEDWEEKLY & AFTER EACH RAINWATER POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILSWPC07STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - TYPE 4NTSWPC071FIBER ROLLSNTSWPC072CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WITH TIRE WASHNTSWPC074CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENTNTSWPC0735609/17/19 116 of 132 zuzu 63REVISIONSMarch 2018IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORREGNART CREEK TRAILCALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile:Scale:Proj. Engr:Checked:Drawn:Designed:Date:APPR.CITYDATEAPPR.DATEDESIGNBYDESIGNSAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK CUPERTINOCITY OFLand Use EntitlementsLand PlanningLandscape ArchitectureCivil EngineeringUtility DesignLand SurveyingStormwater Compliance1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.comE ST.1955MAY 13, 2019AS SHOWNMVCMVCJCJCSHEET OF STAKE AFABRIC SECTION B (SEENOTES 6, 7 & 12)FABRIC SECTION A (SEENOTES 6, 7 & 12)STAKE BJOINING SECTION DETAIL (TOP VIEW)END DETAILEND STAKE DETAIL (TOP VIEW)FABRIC (SEE NOTE 8)2"x2" WOOD STAKE(SEE NOTE 3)END STAKE (SEE NOTE 2)SILT FENCE24"8'458'SANDBAGS TWOLAYERS HIGHSLOPETOP OF SLOPEEND STAKESTAKEFABRICOPTIONAL MAINTENANCE OPENING DETAILSECTION A-ADETAIL ASILT FENCE FABRIC6"6"2"x2" WOOD STAKE(SEE NOTE 3 & 5)SETBACK VARIES (SEE NOTE 4)SLOPETOE OF SLOPESEE DETAIL AFABRIC18"30"5"-2"x2" WOOD STAKE (SEENOTE 3 & 5)SLOPE CCSEE NOTE 10SANDBAGSN.T.S.SECTION C-CN.T.S.CROSS BARRIER DETAILN.T.S.SILT FENCE PLANTOE OF SLOPESILT FENCESLOPESLOPEA ACROSS BARRIER (SEE NOTE (10)TOE OF SLOPECROSS BARRIEREND DETAILFABRICWOOD STAKEOPTIONALMAINTENANCEOPENING DETAIL(SEE NOTE 1)MAX REACH = 500'NOTES:1. CONSTRUCT LENGTH OF EACH REACH SO THAT THE CHANGE IN BASE ELEVATION ALONG THE REACH DOES NOT EXCEED 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE LINEAR BARRIER IN NOCASE SHALL THE REACH LENGTH EXCEED 500'2. THE LAST 8'-0" OF FENCE SHALL BE TURNED UP SLOPE3. STAKE DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL4. DIMENSION MAY VARY TO FIT FIELD CONDITIONS5. STAKES SHALL BE SPACED AT 8'-0" MAXIMUM AND SHALL BE POSITIONED ON THE DOWNSIDE OF THE FENCE6. STAKES TO OVERLAP AND FENCE FABRIC TO FOLD AROUND EACH STAKE ONE FULL TURN. SECURE FABRIC TO STAKE WITH 4 STAPLES7. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN LIGHTLY TOGETHER TO PREVENT POTENTIAL FLOW-THROUGH OF SEDIMENT AT JOINT. THE TOPS OF THE STAKES SHALL BE SECURED WITH WIRE8. FOR END STAKE FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE FOLDED AROUND TWO STAKES ONE FULL TURN AND SECURED WITH 4 STAPLES9. MINIMUM 4 STAPLES PER STAKE. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TYPICAL10. CROSS BARRIERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1/3 AND A MAXIMUM OF 1/2 HEIGHT OF THE LINEAR BARRIER11. MAINTENANCE OPENINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INA MANNER TO ENSURE SEDIMENT REMAINS BEHIND SILT FENCE12. JOINING SECTIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACES AT SUMP LOCATIONS13. SANDBAG ROWS AND LAYERS SHALL BE OFFSET TO ELIMINATE GAPSFABRICNOTES:1. FOR USE IN CLEARED AND GRUBBED AND IN GRADED AREAS2. SHAPE BASIN SO THAT LONGEST INFLOW AREA FACES LONGEST LENGTH OF TRAP3. FOR CONCENTRATED FLOWS SHAPE BASIN IN 2:1 RATIO WITH LENGTH ORIENTED TOWARDS DIRECTION FLOWEDGE OF SEDIMENT TRAPAADRAIN INLETGEOTEXTILE BLANKETSILT FENCE PER SE-01ROCK FILTER (USE IF FLOW ISCONCENTRATED)SHEET FLOWSHEET FLOWSHEET FLOWPLAN12"-24" MAX4'STABILIZE AREA AND GRADE UNIFORMLYAROUND PERIMETERSECTION A-ANOTE:REMOVE SEDIMENT BEFOREREACHING ONE-THIRD FULL1:1 SLOPE1:1 SLOPEWATER POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILSWPC08SILT FENCENTSWPC085STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - TYPE 2NTSWPC0865709/17/19 117 of 132 SHEET OFREVISIONS IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REGNART CREEK TRAIL CALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile: Scale: Proj. Engr: Checked: Drawn: Designed: Date: GENERAL PLAN - BRIDGE 1 S-1 ` 4/22/19 AS SHOWN KOV SMH JOHN ALCIATI 2018389S1 1 65% SUBMITTAL KOV 4/26/19 GENERAL PLAN - BRIDGE 1 S-1 58 63 09/17/19 118 of 132 SHEET OFREVISIONS IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REGNART CREEK TRAIL CALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile: Scale: Proj. Engr: Checked: Drawn: Designed: Date: GENERAL PLAN - BRIDGE 2 S-2 2 4/22/19 AS SHOWN KOV SMH JOHN ALCIATI 2018389S1 1 65% SUBMITTAL KOV 4/26/19 GENERAL PLAN - BRIDGE 2 S-2 59 63 09/17/19 119 of 132 SHEET OFREVISIONS IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REGNART CREEK TRAIL CALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile: Scale: Proj. Engr: Checked: Drawn: Designed: Date: ABUTMENT LAYOUT - BRIDGE 1 S-3 3 4/22/19 AS SHOWN KOV SMH JOHN ALCIATI 2018389S1 1 65% SUBMITTAL KOV 4/26/19 ABUTMENT LAYOUT - BRIDGE 1 S-3 60 63 09/17/19 120 of 132 SHEET OFREVISIONS IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REGNART CREEK TRAIL CALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile: Scale: Proj. Engr: Checked: Drawn: Designed: Date: ABUTMENT LAYOUT - BRIDGE 2 S-4 4 4/22/19 AS SHOWN KOV SMH JOHN ALCIATI 2018389S1 1 65% SUBMITTAL KOV 4/26/19 ABUTMENT LAYOUT - BRIDGE 2 S-4 61 63 09/17/19 121 of 132 SHEET OFREVISIONS IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REGNART CREEK TRAIL CALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile: Scale: Proj. Engr: Checked: Drawn: Designed: Date: ABUTMENT DETAILS No. 1 S-5 5 4/22/19 AS SHOWN KOV SMH JOHN ALCIATI 2018389S1 1 65% SUBMITTAL KOV 4/26/19 ABUTMENT DETAILS No. 1 S-5 62 63 09/17/19 122 of 132 SHEET OFREVISIONS IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR REGNART CREEK TRAIL CALIFORNIACUPERTINOFile: Scale: Proj. Engr: Checked: Drawn: Designed: Date: S-6 6 4/22/19 AS SHOWN KOV SMH JOHN ALCIATI 2018389S1 1 65% SUBMITTAL KOV 4/26/19 STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS AND TESTING S-6 63 63 09/17/19 123 of 132 Roadway Crossing at Blaney Ave Plan View Elevation of Pole with Sign and Ped-Actuated Flashing Beacon Attachment D 09/17/19 124 of 132 Trail Alternative 4 and 5 Alignments Alternative 4 Pacifica Dr – Blaney Ave – La Mar Dr – E. Estates Dr Alternative 5 Rodrigues Ave – Parkside Lane – Wilson Park – Vicksburg Dr – E. Estates Dr Attachment E 09/17/19 125 of 132 Popular Trail Widths 1 09/17/19 126 of 132 Popular Trail Widths 2 09/17/19 127 of 132 Popular Trail Widths 3 Saratoga Creek Trail 7’ paved, 11.5’ clear 09/17/19 128 of 132 Regnart Creek Trail Cost Comparison of Options *All options assume that Valley Water maintenance ramps are relocated to north side of creek and no impact to Wilson Park ballfields **Wood privacy fencing estimated $50/LF. Concrete block wall privacy fencing estimated $500/LF. 2600 linear feet is the approximate length of private fencing adjacent to trail. ***Improvements to home frontages along Lozano Lane and De Palma Lane to be determined through cooperative discussions with affected property owners to replace or alter existing private fencing, estimated cost $40,000. ****On-street bikeway improvements per “Alternative 4” along Pacifica Drive, Blaney Ave and La Mar Drive estimated cost $175,000. Pop-up bollards at crossings. *****Costs include 20% soft cost and 15% contingency allowance Option* A B C D E F Multi-use Path Yes Yes No, footpath. AC paving only to make multi-use No, footpath. AC paving, grading and underdrain to make multi-use No, footpath. AC paving, grading and underdrain to make multi- use No, footpath. AC paving, grading and underdrain to make multi-use Roadway Crossings Full Improvement (High-vis X-walk, Bulb-outs, RRFB's) Full Improvement (High-vis X- walk, Bulb-outs, RRFB's) Full Improvement (High-vis X-walk, Bulb-outs, RRFB's) Full Improvement (High-vis X- walk, Bulb-outs, RRFB's) Full Improvement (High-vis X-walk, Bulb-outs, RRFB's) Full Improvement (High-vis X- walk, Bulb-outs, RRFB's) Surface AC pavement on aggregate base, 8’ w/2’ shoulders AC pavement on aggregate base, 8’ w/2’ shoulders 8’ wide decomposed granite w/binder on aggregate base 8’ wide decomposed granite w/binder on aggregate base 8’ wide decomposed granite w/binder on aggregate base 8’ wide decomposed granite w/binder on aggregate base Railings Throughout Throughout At trailheads and at Top of Bank from Blaney to East Estates At trailheads and at Top of Bank from Blaney to East Estates At trailheads and at Top of Bank from Blaney to East Estates Only at trailheads Grading Full Improvement (Graded throughout) Full Improvement (Graded throughout) Full Improvement (Graded throughout) Minor to address localized drainage issues (no underdrain) Minor to address localized drainage issues (no underdrain) Minor to address localized drainage issues (no underdrain) Drainage Improvements Full Improvement (Underdrain throughout) Full Improvement (Underdrain throughout) Full Improvement (Underdrain throughout) Minor Minor Minor Privacy Fencing** 2,600’ concrete 2,600’ wood 2,600’ wood 2,600’ wood 2,600’ wood 2,600’ wood ADA Compliant Yes Yes No No No No Lozano/De Palma Area Improvement*** Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes On-street Bikeway Improvements (“Alt. 4”)**** No No Yes Yes Yes No Cost***** $5,000,000 $3,400,000 $2,800,000 $2,200,000 $2,000,000 $1,600,000 Attachment G 09/17/19 129 of 132 RESOLUTION NO. 19-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019- 20 BY APPROPRIATING, TRANSFERRING, AND UNAPPROPRIATING MONIES FOR SPECIFIC FUNDS WHEREAS, the orderly administration of municipal government depends on a sound fiscal policy of maintaining a proper ratio of expenditures within anticipated revenues and available monies; and WHEREAS, accomplishing City Council directives, projects and programs, and performing staff duties and responsibilities likewise depends on the monies available for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that the balances from the funds specified in this resolution are adequate to cover the proposed amended appropriations, and therefore recommends the fund reallocations described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the recommended fund reallocations and ratifies the attached amended appropriations. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 17th day of September 2019, by the following vote: Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ________ Steven Scharf, Mayor City of Cupertino ________________________ Date ATTEST: ________________________ Grace Schmidt, City Clerk ________________________ Date 09/17/19 130 of 132 Project Original Budget Estimated New Budget Increase / <Decrease> Outside Funding Additional Required Regnart Creek Trail Design and Environmental Clearance $380,000 $813,000 $433,000 0 $433,000 09/17/19 131 of 132 Attachment I - Items that Remain in Progress with Valley Water 1)Proposed retaining curb along South Blaney to East Estates Drive recommended to be built along the property line. 2)Valley Water prefers drainage to be sloped away from the creek. 3)A portion of the existing chain link fence along Cupertino Civic Center to Rodrigues Avenue resides within a Valley Water easement. 4)Trailhead features should not impede maintenance vehicle access. 5)Proposed water pollution control measures. 6)Location and structural aspects of the bridge. 7)Bridge replacement and removal plan. 8)Land swap locations to be determined based on the City’s calculation of impacted Valley Water right-of-way area. 9)Proposed improvements if the unpaved trail is implemented. 10) Fencing treatments along the De Palma Lane and Lozano Lane properties. 11) Details of the proposed/relocation of maintenance ramp. 12) Joint use agreement. 13) Potential improvements within Valley Water land at De Palma/Lozano to address impacts to adjacent property owners concerns regarding privacy and security. 09/17/19 132 of 132