CC 11-20-72
.
.'
CD![ ,. UII'~INO, S~ate of Ca1UOZIIia
11 Tone AVeD"'. Cupertino. ~
- - _ - : 2S2-4SGS
.-¥'
,
'~f~~~ œ DE pent a.~--:':'~-~~t_, CITf COU1CCIL
~,,1IIUt ...dD 20. l~~~....-..rn. CIWIBE1l
;t:" em IW.L. UJRIIa~ c;&'IIOØIA
;f~r " ~i ~rt~~l~o
., ,. DI I'IMõ
.~.~:/;_ ,{f
~;~t:..l1ch caned tile aeet~ Co..r at 7132 P.M. with tile Salate
IIIÌ ilia ftaa·
~.
.... C&L
t"
t'
1'1--.. prue::
1'1......... absent:
Irvin, J-"--. *1en, Sparn, Mayor rroUch
None
.
Saff present:
City KaDcer q.....t_
Cit)' Attoney .w-
Director of ,J --."1 and Develop::ent S1sk
Director of PubLic Worn Yaroorough
Director of Parka and Recreation
Director of ~.ftt.trative Services
_.--..~~ OP 'REV:OCS !ŒETIIGS
1- Approval of !C:Sutes of MJ~ -, ~ar meat1ns November 9, 1972.
Qa .... 3, Une 1, CoUDC~lman .1-:.-_ .814 the references are in fact
!' ._ 235 and s.cUon 236 rat::ler thaD .u-23S and A3-236.
.... 3. paragrap:. .., .ecoad 1iAa. eft..... Irwin a.ked to have the
~ "1.1"10&" deleted aDd replac84 rich the word "working".
Qa .... S, para¡~b S, last 1iDe. C::W-~1aaD Me)'ers asked that the
~ -CoaDt)''' be teleted aDd revl~'" rich the word "Cit)'".
. .A ),y CouDcilu:1 :!!e)'u., nc: f.... It» C:-c1lman Jackson to approve
ilia --.. of s..--ncber 9, 1972. _ corrected.
.
Hotioa ~. ~
,
CC-136
Page 1
Nov. 9th K1nut
approved as
corrected .
.
.
a:-136
.... 2
__...!! or THE ....A..mEll 20. JÐ2 an COIIIICIL IIUoUIlG
.
jpprønl of llillut.. of ~t.:~ ~ Till of 1Io.....u6. ~¡ .
~#~1fda "'41&ph~, .' .'.. ~...- ta T_"1,~,":''r:,~ ~";'
~..,.," ."accorcUDa to ,,'i'~" . '«'~:"..F:,;s.,.-1<!)~~,
. ,,5,1.- paÜar~pít."...." 1iot101l QG t1Ie ...,~'ftíþ1t.>
:'''i3~''-1.oI1Ie cIe1aÞ4:,' Wida "a-l". ' , ',',
,15. m~ i.au ..l~····~~"~h wœldl1ka t!Ia:~~'¡¡' ~
that a cert1fieol1"~,' 'hèD _t to Hr. DDru. ... doaC
tB ... rat...... ... ":':::-¡,,:~:t'~ ::"" ,
';' ~
:rev. 6 If"
approved _
",,"ected
.. Å by Connri1..... IrwiD. _ ".... IIy Counc11=an JawOl1. to ..........
die !liDutes a! Sovaber 6. 1972. _ corrected.
~ canted, 5-0
3.
~SICATIC'5S
Written
I
I
The Director of AclmiDù~t~_ Services stated there were dtr_
agenda-related cOllllllUl1ic:at1.cDs received:
A. Req-¡:est from Direc~ of Publ1c Health that the City of
CUl'er:1"" adopt an .........t on an urgency basis to its
ord~~c~ rela~ing ~ ~~.1 and rabies control so that
dog license fees caD be chaaged OR Deceaber 1, 1972.
B. Req::est frOlll 1ntersU. IDe.. for approval to provide a<!::1t1onal
off~~e space from Soweobcr 20, 1972 through April 1973 by
the ,¡Be of coutruc:t!ø2 trailers.
C. An ~"~ce from Hr. Peter !t. Nakahara, Attorney repres...tift¡
Hr. a::d ~rs. Daniel ~. I%u, cnmers of property 1Iith1D che
proposed undergro~ utility dls~rict, stating ~hat hiS
clim:s are in fa~ of such a d1stric~.
D. Three notices froa the ~lic Utilities Coam1ss1on:
Hearing scheduled for SøYecber 20, 1972, on the petitiDo
by Paci!ic Teleplloae aod Telegraph Co"'pa.~y for au~hor1t,.
to increase certa1n iDtrasta~e ra~es.
Heari:g scheduled far ~&DU&ry 5, 1973, on motion by Pacific
Tele,hone and Te1egra?Þ Caapany for consolidation of 2 applications.
f,
.
\
¡
e·
- 20. 1972 CITY COUIICIL IŒETlS
& _UiaÌa"i~,_ orIIeriD¡ that eas.lo. 1993 be
nopeaed ,.&if- ,):.. of cooa1deriDl the appllcatloll
of,the..sl'~~. . r~OuIIIIlaa rules fo~ e1ectric aDd
te1epJioae'~-";"'''C:O aDd vtthiD IUIV ruu.aUaln!l-
, tI1ri1iq1Ì11. .
"" ~','" '~","
E. AD ..uiju4 t .....1011 depol1ted iD the .....tloll box
"CaD't ~ tie'" about all the JOIIIII ch11drUl who
p~ iD the .U_C .... all the dOls "0 ro. aar..tra1.'ed
iD the vlcWcy of ftaJ: Lap Dd"e and Madera Dri".. II
r. TVD I: ."f...-ioas nlatiøa to the interpretation aDd
applicat100 of che 1964 General Plan .. related to the
cuneat, proposea oMvelopmeøu:
lIoveaber 12. 1972. frca Friends of the roothiUs and
lIon.ber 13. 1972. fraa Chairman of C1~1zens Goals CoI=it
~...
lfoved by Counc1lJ:1&D !".eyers. aeconded by Councllaan Irwin to
~ece1ve and file the Written CotmNDications.
Øot1øn carried, 5-0
4. Oral CoaaunicatioDs
A. ¡¡one
B. ..quest by CoaDcil:MD for removal of items froa the
Conaent Cal8llÜr.
Cou.1cU_ .JacksoD said he had sOlae questions abou~
Alen4a It. 43.
upon OF COUIICIL IIEl'USØU%IVES
's. Ka:ror rrol1cb:
Traasportat1on Advisory Coaa1ttee
.
A questionnaire 1a loiJla out to the cities from the P18l1l1iDg
c:-1Ue. of the Traasportation Advisory ColllÚ.~~ee to try to
..tablish a way for tbe Transportation Advisory Comaittee to
consider clevel. U iøvolviaa projects of a certain magni-
tulle. Inpu~ boa tile Capertino City S~aff will be apprec1at
CC-136
Pap 3
4
;~
,.
.~
"
Written
COI:II:IUn1catio:1s
received and
filed
.
Ques~ionnaire
going ou~ to
the citi..
e
'-
, ,
, .
.
__uw:o or DE ..._UlII&Á 20. 1972 Crn' ~CIL ~.1114
titèr.::t1t CòaIIc11
, '1
~:r.::=:r~,;¡;;~~:L~~~::~:-C1a ~:,r:~!.:..!:;~ :¡::'
If,ûU. Saa,,',Jòn bas;iát:aè.:.l., tbaJ ·ar. aoiDI to, .... t°al"· --;
·~iou tlÏOÍsÍht to tb8ÛCÔDtribut1on to' tbia if the "ot!Da proce40Þ
i.DOt chaD&tid. Soour, ft later. this utter 'v.U1 baY. to 'be reaol...a.
Leape of l:.al1fom1a Cities - 110 report.
Lq1alatlve .."lev c-1uee - 110 report.
,
6. Couac1luD IrviD:
Drul Abuse Coordination Commission - No report.
Police ComDittee -- No repor~.
In regard ~o the Leape of Cal1fomia Cities neeting, CouncUI!I&D Irvin
said t~e priBe i~em was a discussion by Mr. Bell re~ard1ag revenue
shariag. The cities vere advised not to spend i~ until the, have it.
7. Councilman Jackson: Association of Bay Area Govum:oents
A Reglonal Crowth Policy vas approved. It indicated a 1.7% per year
Irowth until 1980. CrovtD rates from 1980 ~o 2000 are be1nl s~ud1ed.
Santa Clara County Water C0m01ssion - ~o report.
Urban ~evelopmen~ and Open Space Subc~1~tee
of PPC
ABAG gave a presen~a~ion on regional planning. It vas poln~ed out that
study should be !1ven to various means of se~ting aside open space lands.
.
Airpor~ Land Use Subcommi~tee of PPC
A gen~lecan from the San Jose A1rpor~ gsve a presentatlon of a nolse
study tha~ has been conducted. As soon as ~he equipMent is available,
ve will conduct a noise study.
8. Councllman Keyers: Planning Policy Comm1t~ee - No report.
Hillside Subcommittee of PPC -- Will meet 11/21,
7:30 P.M., Planning Department, Room 314,
Coun~y Building.
. ,,-~ ~""" '
-
.
lUIIUJ:d OF THE IlUVI!IIIID 20. 1972 CITY COUNCIL KEETIRG
\-'-""J!~;-<", ;, " ' .
" .' :;:,~,. ',f., , c-1JIIIID S~!,¡: ,~11øocI CoutNl Mv180ry c-ittee - ~~
,t..,':':;,IT'". A,\" ,.' .-r-
",",,' '.K"'",,, .~- .'
}~¿" 7;l1:P;:',':,,-· ·b~:· "'& ('- ..
f", 'J,)<~~~:> \~- ~::~:'j\ 1e-· f·.iooOQ Aleobol1sa
""~:,,.. e_ -, -"--: i~:: ,.,' ',:;~ii'¡;i;:':")k;;:~~ ','. . .
';·..,,:i~ , . '., Spub:~~~f4'~~;-et1Da the previoua 'fuudÀ1. aloøl
.~~~:>\~,;~~~ 23x.bera _)~ Members. Of the six a11110a dollar
~r\!"~:"~t'- the lut~t1!O'yeBS. two 111111011 dollars baY. .- for
) ,,'riha!ÞUltatiOD at staDford. Be also learued there are fourteeD
, pri"ate. proUt...,Irf.. halfway bouses in the area. Be is a
IIØIIer of &11 ad boc ~tt.. who will b.. visiting theee estab-
ti~ts in the near future. Sometiœ before Chrutaaa they will
also be visit1ns the druDk tank.
PLA1IN1NG cœHISSION
10. Subl11ss10n of Minutes of regular :eet1na of Nove:lber 13, 1972
11. Application l8-TM-72 of Hacka>" HC':Iu, Dl9is1on of lta1ser-
Ae~... for Ten~atlge !fa;> ~o subd1,,~de 8.3 + acres iaro 34 lo~s
consisting of 29 single-family cluster residential lots and
1 lo~ to be held in coamon 0~~er5h1p, 3 single-f~1ly detach
residential lo~s and one lot ~o re:a1n undeveloped. Said
property is located adjacent ~o and westerly of ~cClellan Roa
approœ1cately 250 fee~ ~esterly of the intersectio~ of Byrne
Aveaue. Reco_aded for approval. Con~inued frOll!
~oveDber 6, 1972.
SEE IŒLATED AGENDA 1T~ ~o. 24.
"
12. Application l7-TK-72 of Es~ate H~es, Inc., for Ten~at1ve
Hap ~o subdivide 5.20 acres into 11 11-7.5 (Residential,
s1Dgle-fa=lly, 7,500 sq. f~. per d~ell1ng unit) lots. Said
property is located in the sou~heast quadrant of H1ghvay 85
aDd Romes~ead Road. Recomaended for denial.
SEE iELATED AGENDA ITEM NO. 25.
MCHITECtI;UL AND SITE APnOVAL CO~Ië't[E
13. Suba1ss10n of K1øutes of regular =eet1ng of Nove=ber 8, 1972.
14. Application HC-Sl,30S.l of Baywest Associates requesting
approval of site. architecture, landscap1ng, grading and
UDderground1ng of utilities for eleven duplex un1~s located
westerly of and adjacent to Foothill Blvd. be~ween Voss
Avenue and Alcalde Road. Approval reco_ended.
Høved by Counc1l1ll&l1 Heyen, seconded by Councllman Irwin to ap-
prove application HC-5l,305.1.
, lløtion carried, 5-0
CC-136
Pase S
~ i
l8-TK-72 --
See Agenda
1~e::Í 24.
17-TM-72 --
See Agenda
Ite 25.
HC-5l,305.l
approved
.
.
CC-I36
.... 6
_...S lIP till! MIØlBD 20, 1972 cm COIIIICIL IllErDIG
;-"
App1fcad- BC-51.2IS.2. of r..nJ ø-s-LJtla ~epr",. ~... .,
raCtUl Sip. t ,.í '-c approval of a lip pUll '.',at. ~da1
" ....,.11. 1oc.t_ac;,~<:_CbIIut comer of Sar~. ....
..;>j;-;a.! Un1a ......'.;"..JfJ;.~a ft_ trr.... . ,
-,~ ,." ..
j
c
:' .
'117 c -n__ Iz1da~¡ j r' .-. II)' CoaIIcn.. J...·-oa CÒ/~.....
'1cat1aa 1C-51.285.2.' '
BDCfaD carried. 5-0
aC-5l,07S.3O
approved
16. Application øc-51.075.3O of VaIlco Park, Ltd.. requelt1q approval
of a sip plaa for a 11&ht 1DcIustr1al bulldiDa located at nooo
Volfe load. ApprOYal r« -ioecl.
lløged by c........cllman 1rviD, aecoaded by Councilman Jacuoa to appl'OYe
.ppl1catic~ ac-5l,075.30.
J,
I
.
!
!lotion carded, 5-0
17. Appli:ation HC-5l,230.6 of Federal Siln and Signal Co~rat1on
(Bill Jeane Goodyear) requesting ap~roval of a sign plan for a
co~=:ial building located at ~he c~rthwest corner of Hoses~ead
Road a:::.: Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road. Approval recooceaded.
:iC-5l,230.6
approved
Koved by C:~~~ilman 1rJia, seconded by C~uncilman Jackson to approve
applica~1:: :(-51.230.6.
Motion carried, 5-0
18. Appli~ation HC-5l,209.l of Any ~~untain, L~d., reques~1ag approval
of ~¿i:ication of architecture for a ~c~rc1al building located
in the !ancno De ADza ~noppiDI Center at 20603 Valley Green Drive.
Refer=ed back ~o Archi~ectural and Si:e Approval Co:sittee by ~h.
City C:~cil. Approval recommended.
:i:-5l,209.1
r,lproved
Koved by c,,;;::cilman IrwÚl. seconded by c:.:-u:dlman Meyers to approve
appl1caU"" !iC-51,209.l
Mo~ioD carried, 5-0
PARKS A.\1I !lECR£ATION C~SI0JII
19. Sub..i..i~n of Minutes of regular meeting of Nov~bcr 14, 1972.
.
.
...-n1'S OF ym; JO'lEIIBD 20. 1972 CITY COUNCIL !ŒETING
'('ftMT~C¡lœ
~"'~IO!I
~ruaIllO CITIZDS GOALS UR2IUU...
22. 10 _till¡ scheduled.
1'UlL1C 1i£ß::S;;S.
23. Fo~:::~:: a~ Undergrou~ U~il1ty Dis~rict, the area being
in t~e ~==thves~ quadrant of the intersection of Stevens
Cree;' ,:..~. and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road.
The Llre~:== :: Public ~orks reviewed the te=~nical data in his
ataff rep'=: :at.d Nove--ber 20, 1972. He noted the proper~y
-..er has :;,e :¡ot1on of doinr; his 010'II trenc:>1ng, hiring a con-
~rac~or a: =:; ~.~ expense, or may add the cost of the work to the
to~al ass.s>='~: costs and finance ~he vork along vith ~he rest of
d1e wor;'.
Kayor Frc::~~ ss;'ed for coamer.ts from ~he a~1ence.
!Ir. Charles :.a.r, 20451 Stevans Creek Blvd., Cupertino, asked
abou~ the .r:.:~10n for s~ree~ lights. The D1rec~or of Public
¡Orks sa~; :~.r. viII be li~ting provided shortly, at ~he expense
of the d~·e:=..rs. Only the c~rner light. viII be included in the
..ses...e:: ;:,:=:ct. Mr. Saer next sta~ed t!1at he had monitored
~he traf::c a: that 1n~er.ect1on at various hours and did not feel
£he double :.:t-turn lane is warranted. He is very concerned
about h1s ¡oers=~al expense in ~his assessmen~ dis~r1ct and feels
tha~ he vU: ~.:'t benefit fro: it.
CC-136
Pea- 7
,~
.
. '~
Pro..er~y O'.:uer
objects ~o
LID
lløved by C"'-':>o: U:aan Jackson, seconded by Councilman Irvin to close Public Hear 1ng
'che Public iuring. closed
Mo~1oD carried, 5-0
, <f$"
~::. .:,;~, "
¡"fit4':;}'
j :·~i:1~;:~{;;~-
\;'i~'~~ .,7,'
'C~~ ' ,;(,
':...
". .', ' ~..
,The developer'
proposal.
.
':-
i"
.
.
ImIrns OF 111& __ 20. 1972 ern OOUIICIL IlUòUJlC
CI) 1Mo1llCioD 110", ..431 .. Iuolucioa of the City CoII1ICil of
tile C1Cy ot~¡'~.J.'- Cruc1q a S,.c1f1c UDd.'*~OIIII4 Vcility
:-:::.;....... f' ;"""4"1 w........ma: Vt11ity D1ft, ricc h. 2.
~r~ --t DIaU1ct.hoject 71-2." -,r.... ~ Hayor
froUc:Ia.
.... ~ ~'~n--,Inta. secDlldotð ~ CouIIc1bD .factaOD to appEowe
.. MopC '-lacs.' 110. 3101-23 1a1tiatiJl¡ fonatioa of aD UDdera'o ,..a
VCUit)' Dlaukc ta áccorimce with the øb1b1t aDd ct..cdptioa of the
trOject Uldt. '
'.,
~
:.,
ATDI
IOU:
CoIIIIcU- Inta. JackaoD. !!eyers, Sparks, Mayor FroUch
...
MoUn can-iClcl. s-o
24, Appll~stln 1~Z-72 of ~ßckar Homes, Division of Ka1ser-Aetna
~or prezoninl of 8.3+ acres, as f~llows: 5.4 acres from Santa
Clara County AI (Residential and Agricultural) Zone ~o City of
~upert1ao alC-7.5 (Jesiden~1al, sinsle-fa=11y cluster. 7,500 sq. it.
,er dwelling uait) Zone, 1.0 &Cre fron San~a Clara Coun~y A1
(~esident1al and A&ricul~~ral) Zone to Clty of CUper~!no Rl-7.5
'~'sidential, sinale-fanily, 7,500 sq. ft. per d~el11n~ uni~) Zone,
:.9 acres from Santa Clara Co~~:y A: (Residen~ial and A~rirul~~ral)
:~~. ~o Ci~y of Cuper~1no Al-43 (Agrtcul~~ral-P.esident~al, single-
:~~tly, l-acre lots) loroe. Said pro?erty is located adjacent to
a~~ we.terly of McClellan R~~~ apìioxl~4~ely 2~~ feet ~esterly of
~~~ 1ntersect1oa of !Yl"ne Av~nae. RccOCQen~ed for ap~roval.
,Continued fraa 5OVr.:lber 6, B72.)
SEE RELArED AGESDA ITEM XO. 11, Page 5. these Minutes.
Tho P:3nninl Direc~or revt...·cd the ~:ove:::ber 17, 1972 staff rt>?Ort on
thole ~at~.rs. Colored s11¿es, ~p' an1 photogra?hs of the area ~ere
Ihc~. He indicated t~i. propo5al ¿ces confcr~ tQ the 1964 General Plan.
110 Len reviewed ~"e traffic pa~ter',', i"eluding a bicyele path across
thl :::od plain. He said the Flood Plaln Ordinance will be available
b.fcre April of 1973. There follo.ed a Jiscusslon of ~he overall,
'Ventual density of ~he entire nelg~~orhood.
Mr. L. ~:eWlDan, Vice-President of Mackay lIomes, stated they Are developing
hore a t,'pe of unit designed for the "e::!pty nester", fer ~hich there is
. areat demand. Statis~ics show less than 2 pecple per ~nit for the3e
hol'lu. They are using ~he basic "Flnnegan Cluster Concept". lie asked
thl1t the Council consider the additlon of th.. 29t~. ua!t to help k..ep
the ~onthly service charge for the residents do~~. Th..v lntcnd to cut
off the bain winery building to one floor and will use 1t for recreational
purposes. The ban~ will be landscaped. The historic De Anza slte will be
"
.
e·
KIJlDrES or THE IIOYEØIIIJl 20, 1972 CITY COUlCClL IØŒTDlG
pre___'" aDd pro'liaioo v1l1 be ..de 80 the>' C&D sit clouD ~
relaa aDd ""01 the ~cy of the area. I1s offer to show sUdes
of tile stte vere ctec1iDe11 swe the Councl1, b'.,., f.l1iar with
it. A portfolio of the proposal ... pas.... oat to the Council.
Be clW DOt object to the adctitioola1 ccmditioD of approval 8U"e.~
111 the 1Io91'1'beT 17, 1972 staff report.
MaTOr FroUch asked for ~ta frOll the .uctieuce. There vere
DOh.
Kov'" b, Councilll&n Irvin. .eccmd'" b, Counc1111aD Sparks to c10.e
the Public Rearing.
Motion canied, 5-0
As to ~he question of ~2 uni~. rather tha~ the 31.8 ~o which they
are entitled, Cou~cil2an Meyers ob.erved ~~ey could coce back at
a later date for rezoning of the additional property and pick up
the extra unit.
Cou~cil~an Jackson questioned ~~e~her or no~ ~he real objective of
clustering for the purpose of providing open space 15 being over-
looked. This is a fairly dense develo?Men~, vith ~he bank as thc
open space. The flood plain cannot be developed in any case.
Mr. D~ico asked that the public hearing be reopened, due to a
point raised by the Ci~y Council.
So "",ved by CouncU=ø Irwin, .econded by Councilman Jackson.
Hotion carried, 5-0
Mr. Da=ico .a1d he has lived here more than fifty ,ear.. The
question of flood plain is somewhat recent. The threat of a flood
here is minimal. He said the Flood Control District !>ade hi!> ,an
offer for the low land.. He .a1d all hi. proper~y has been svb-
divided siL~e 1917 and ~axe. have been paid, ba.ed on ~he h1"des~
and best use of this property. If ~he channel were cleaned up
~here vould oe no dan¡er of flooding. The intended altern,ate use
of this property i. ~he extended park and recreation, which viII
fit into ~h. General Plan as open .pace. The Flood Con~rol Distr1 t
viII pa, hi!> for this proper~y based on ~he zoning of th1. propert
He sub!>itted ~ha~ ~he condi~ion ~hat this be zoned as flood plain
.hould be deleted. This i. a reasonable request becau.e the zonin
tha~ ~hey have on that parcel viII determine to a grea~ ex~ent ~~a
the rlood Control Dis~r1ct viII pay for this property. There are
property owners, botb ups~reæD and downstream who are also very
concerned about ùOWDgrading of the zoning of their properties.
CC-136
ragt ~
~
Public Ruring
clo.ed
Public Hearing
reopened
Mr. Da:>ico's
statel:Jents
1~1~
.... 10
iÍJ.tbaf~ ,
~-~
:,a1t1e'
~,
.~.
~,
"
~
"
~ l'ro;>osal is a
~loodQne
U-32.S (Y~
Addicional
la."1guage
18-Z-72
appro'led
w/cond~cio"s
.
.
IWIUUS or TIIB IlUfAOa 20.' 1972 cnr COUICIL MDrDIC
CoaIIcn- IIV1â,Þb4. ,f)-till Director 11 the _t lIf ....,
offered to Hr.D~ICO{t.¡;COQt1n¡lIIIt 0\1 vhàt the City CouDd1 41088 to
this propertY~T1Wt},"~f"l Director sa14 that .iaee it ia a rert of
the OpeD :;iI8èeltt~o/,t.!of the GIIIIeral 'I.. it vUl haYea laflaeace
OD the f1ooc1pfa1D~"ª\it. ia',detemiDed that it 18 developable property.
it vUl thllll bave,¡.~~OD the price of the proputy.
, <,'" '" ,",
Rultor JU&Ditalid..ria; 22101 Lindy Lane. Mid she baa rapreseoted
this property ower for tve1ve years. Taxe. hav., beeo over $500 per
!lOath. She went over the past negotiations with the City 011 thi.
property. She said these people have cooperated 100% w1..h the City.
They feel the property should be retained in its oriainal state. ¡¡he
appeald to the City Council for the 29th UD.tt. She assured them there
vas no way they would put sOIDe additional hc=es in front of the family
home.
Hrs. Ann Anger, Konta Visu, was very wch in favor of ~hi3 proposal.
She felc it was very carefully designed. Ther~ will be no strain on
the school district. It will be private ~~ership rather than rentals.
Hr. Damico said he did Dot object to Rl-32.5 zoning on the home s1~e.
Mo~ed by Counciloan Irwin, seconded by Councllaan Jack50n Co close
the Public Hearing.
Motion carried, 5-0
Co""cl1uu.1 Jackson susgesced SOllie addit1on.,l language be added ~o the
effe~t that the fixing of the purchase price shall be established prior
to che recordation of the final ""'p.
Moved by Councilman Mayers, seconded by Councilman [r~ln co approve
applica~ion 18-Z-72 wi~h ~he %oning ~o be identified on lot 33 as
RI-32.S and the remaining zon~ng to be in accordance with Planning
Commlssion Resolu~ion 1111 and further, that a purchase price be agreed
upo~ prier to the recordation of the final map.
AYES:
NOES:
Councilmen Irwin, Jackson, Meyers, Sparks, Mayor Frolich
None
Motion carried, 5-0
, Bœ;JTES OF TIlE !lJLa 20, 1972 CITY COUNCIL HE~~
Ct;-l36
Page 11
l&-1'K-72
approved
v/_clitions
,
j
lined by Counciboan Meyen. seconded by CouncUman Irwin to
.J œVIII application l&-tH-n in ac:cordance with Planning ('0-..-
: ,i" ~'JIøolution No.1U2. with the additional condition rec_ --"'41
,"" ,", " .'
}~ ",.l_illl Director·...., ~d by the City Council tbattJle
'of Lot 33 bel1-32.S:with the reuinillg zoning to be Is
d.
~
,.
, ''\..,>¡:~
, ü~"__-'" ',,~
, , ' "'/<"", ''I.''''-'--?'''':
," c:oåK".....-"I!dø¡;J'-*-. Heyen. Sparks.
~;¡~'... J ~'l,:~',~.~:..~: ,;__,\",c
4('/ ' :'.- '-r:?',
"j;~';__ .'C >~..,
'~:'?1IõtÜG carded. 5-0
,
"",}
i:,:'> ~--
Kayor FroÍ1da <,
,~~.-, ~':~',~l~J:·~ ,
,.{iJkjói Frolic:b c:al1ed a n_ at 9:30 P,N. The meeting reconwucl
l' 8&:,,9145 P.K. '
(8) Pirat Jeadillg of Orcl1DaDce No. 562: "An Ordinance of the
City of Cupertillo AMøclina Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2 by
Pre zoning 8.3f Acres. .. Follows: 5.4 Acres from Santa Clara
County Al (Resideøtial az:i Agricultural) Zone to Ci~y of
Cupertino RlC-7.5 (Besidential, Single-Family Cluster, 7,500
Sq. r~. per DweJ.ling UDit) Zone; 0.3 Acre from Santa Clara
County Al (Residential ~d Agricultural) Zone to City of
Cupertino Rl-7.5 (Residential, Single-FalDily, 7,500 Sq. Ft.
per Dwelling Unit) Zone; 0.8 Acre from Santa Clara ('.cunty Al
(Residential and Agricultural) Zone ~o City of Cupertino
II-32.5 (Residential, Single-ram11y, 32,500 Sq. Ft. per Duel-
ling Unit) Zone; 1.9 Acres from Santa Clara . County Al (Jesi-
deøtial and Þ.gricultural) Zone to City of Cupert1no AI-43
(Agricultural-Residential, Single-Family, l-Acre Lots) Zone;
Loca~ed Adjacent ~o and W~s~erly of McClellan Road Approxi-
..tely 250 Feet Wes~erly of the Intersec~ion of Byrne Avenue."
-- read by Mayor rrol1c:b.
JIowd by Councilman Jackson, seconded by Councilman Irwin to have
OrcI1lUUU:e No. 562 read by title only and ~he Mayor's Reading is
CO c:oaatitu~e the First Reading.
Or'll. 562
First !leading
AYES: Councilmen Irwin, Jacltson, Meyers, Sparks, Mayor Frolicb
mES: Hone
MOtion carried, 5-0
25. Appl~ca~ion 17-Z-72 of Es~ate Homes, Inc., for rezoning of
5.2~ acres from 11-10 (Residen~ial, single-family, 10,000
sq. ft. per dwelling UDit) Zone to City of Cupertino 111-7.5
lasidential, single-faaily, 7,500 sq. ft. per dwelling unit)
Zone. Said proper~y i. located in the sou~heast quadrant of
Highway 85 and H01IIestead Road. Jecollllllended for denial.
SEE RELATED AGENDA !TEH !D. 12, Page 5, these minutes.
Tbe Planning Director reviewed the proposal, including colored
s11des of the site. The ~ity of Sunnyvale has stated there should
. lie s_ further consideration as to jurisdiction of this area.
Jurisdictional
consideration
ought.
3,4 ,;-bedr>:>om
ho--e~
Jur~sdicc!.ou
110 i'~o¡'l= to
, develo;>e~
, Conc.,ssi~
offered
DuplicaUcm
of services
the area
.
.
.
HDIUTES OF 11ΠNOVEKBD. 20, 1972 CITY COIIIIC1L KEETIlIG
ScÍme citiaeas of:suunrrá1e line approached the City ot S-.....z..a1e .. eo
"..".¡ng this area !lito . pañ.
" '!" :'"" " . ,..' ,: .',:'
Hi~KerviD UausOrif;1141iWob1aberVaJ. rnaicleGt of Eatne~"", _tell
ß~~~~t =:.:~tt~fi~:-,~_f=:'~:~:: :~;::~~:=-;f
, tl1élots, need for~add~tiolla1par1uJ'rather tMlIlIOre 110M.., '~~ appro-
pdate judsdict101l~',JIa said tJaerev111 be c;,re. homes to'êtlleac:n.
whereas the boIIIes already in tJae area are 4+ to the acre. A park could
genera~e IDOre carsliad traffic 011 the D8ighborhood strests. 5erY1ciDa
of this area is too 88all to juatify a park in this locaUoa. according
to the City of Sunnyvale. because it would serv,. a l1l::ited no=ber of
people. If a park is not feasible, he questioned ,,'hat would be the
highest and best use of the Iliad. These homes will cost _re than the
existing hoces. They have designad the layout to allcr.r a _1a= buffer
from the freeway, which is recessed in this area. This property is
bordered by shopping centers, aajor thoroughfares and industrial parks.
There is a 9 acre corner by the existing homes where a school is planned.
Street i:::prcvo!tlents will provide parking spaces. There are 172 f...111es
now living ~~thin the existing neighborhood; adding 17 ho~es will o~ly
increase t~e density slightly. He sai~ a traffic ccu~t o~ Paye~te and
Wright was not si8n1fi~antly high, and ther.. is a traffic signal at
Wright Avenue and Hooestead Ro,~. He asked what could be less
objectionable than 17 high-quality homes on this prooerty.
Counc~lcan S?arks was an~ered these viII be 3, 4 and 5-bedrooc ho~e.;
i r"ostly 4-~c?.iroom.
II ~Ir. Hanson an5wered Council<:an Jac<.son tha~ it ",akes no difference to
him if he annexed to ei~her Su~nyvale or Cupertino.
In ans~er to Councilman ¡~~in's concern about the nois~ genera~ed from
the free~a~, ~r. Hanson said ~e ~ould be prepared to in5tall a concrete
berm or scund mound near those hO:!1es ai'proxi"ately the sa,ce ele·ration
as ~h" free,'ay. The ?l"aning Director said this ,",ould be carefully
reviewed by the Arch1te~tural and Site Approval Co~r.ittee.
Mr. H~~5~n cfiered to put 5~ngle story hones on Lots 10, 11 and ,12
and ~ ~ound or concre~e ~all t? attenuate the noise.
Mayor Frolich asked for co:oents from the audience.
in'
Planning C,,=i5s1oner )lellis said the Planning COlr.:nission was also
concerned that so many ~f ~he :ot5 are backed up to the free~ay and
the duplication of services fr= Sunnyvale and Cupcrtino going do.."
these streets.
.
..
.
IIDIUTES OF TIlE r.n-& 20, 1972 CITY COURCIL MEETDIC
A Sunnyvale reaideAC _ leDdleton Avenue said be ... DOt opposed
to the devdopI8DC of, 1aDð, but he vas opposed to baYúI& it
_ed to CupertiID'åitIIer than Sunnyvale. Be qu..Uoned the
cndibllity of tile ~flc study by the dcveloper. If there were
a fire in the pre, r--tlleYelop1llent he did not IuDv of any Cupertin
fire stations .....1.. <:., ,"Dear the area. He vould lib the tvo
cities to get toa.~'" set~le the jurisdicUoD81 .attar.
The Sunnyvale PI_iJIa ".-iRdon, in an informal .ecing, baa
studied ~h1s proposal aad nated it is a viable one.
!fr. Leeeh, Sunnyvale ¡[..!dent, said he lives adjac:ent co Lo~ 12.
Be said he eould DOt aDdarstand ~he necessity for developing every
pieee of open spaee. Be ecphasized this is one of ~he last pieees
of open spaee in the area. He asked if there .ere federal funds
available for open apac:e. Mayor Frolich said ~h£re are federal
funds for this purpose. Sunnyvale ~ay no~ be interested in using
their federal funds in this location.
Councll:":.:> Me)"ers asked' Mr. Leech if I,e wanted at th~s tbe ~o
es~ablisa a local ~rov8Dent district for t~e neig~boring proper~
owners to purc~ase chia property. Sunnyvale has indicated they
are no~ interested ~ us1n~ federal funds for open .pace in this
isola~ed area. Mr. Le.c~ ~~s not prepared to do t~i. at ~his t~~e
Couneil~n Sparks sUl&ested they form a ho~eo~~ers association ~o
work vith the sc:,col !>oard as to . r..creation area '''' t:'05e 9
acr~s of school land =earby.
Candy Johnson, 1760 Calgary Drive, Sunnyvale, said t~ey really
have a problec in ~~t area as to noise, pollution, traf(ie and
congestion. The only baIfer she has fro: the fre~Jay interchange
is ~he large water t.e::ås. The ...ater tan" were p-.1t on their park
land. She vas op,.,._ to having larger, better quality hoces put
into ~heir neighborhood.
Hrs. Ann Anger, Konta V1s~a, asked if those residents in the area
objee~ing to deve10paenc of ~his land could at least pay ~he
present owner's tazes. Yb1ch are substantial.
Another resident oa Payette Avenue said this whole area is sort of
an ialand unto i~se1f. Be called attention ~o the difficul~
traffic situation on Øoaestead, making i~ difficult for children
to get ~o Serra Park. Be asked for a pos~ponecen~ on ~his appli-
cation.
CC-136
Page 13
Settle
judsd1cdonal
Clatter f1rat"
rederal funds
available for
open s,ace, bu
,,111 they !Ie
used here?
I
Sugg~~::':::l t:..J
:-.eig:lc:J:- ~ -j
purc~.a=e: ::, 'is
open S;:I::£c.
Poss~b~:':':y 0:
rec are. 0:1
&choo!. :iI~~.
Many rr=:':'E;=S
in tha: z=ea
cite:!
I
,1
Pos~,o_nt 'I'
requeste.i
,
!
j
,
Illes 1c1ez1u I'
should have
'taken pos1the
Ktioa.
I
I
,
17-Z-72 and
17-TH-n
pcstpoaed
.
.
.
àUWUIi or TIlE .aNlllan 2D. 1972 Cln COUNCIL Ju¡u..1IG
'JIultor Jolm Ìi1Iuu.. 101D1 Sceø1c Blvd,. Cupert1Do.. u1d be 1wt vodled
'lour years to flit toptlaer . n1table proposal for tbis propertJ~
"rhey held the property oft tile ..rut whUe Suanyv.xa studied the
'1IOHibl1ity of . park ..... - it vas turned dOllD. The property _1'
'4oea DOt vat to ..n tile pzuperty but is forced to do so. Be said
the S1IßD7Vale CeDera1 PI. calla for 8000 sq. ft. lots in tbie area.
ØcmId by Counc1t.ø' Izv1a. seconded by CouncUman Jackson to close the
Public HeariDs.
ttDt10n carried, 5-0
Councilman Irvin review.. the alternatives open to those residents
objecting to development of ~h1s property. They should have taken
more positive action after the proposal for multiples was turned down.
Councilman Jackson said there is very little chance of getting federal
funds for this property. He feels it would be a ~i3take for Cupertino
~o develop this, however, knowing they will ~robably be de-annexed from
Cupertino ~~d annexed by SU:4~yvale. ~e may be saddled with police and
fire prote~tion here. The ~irector of Public Works said Sunnyvale would
have admintscr~tlve cont!"::l o~:cr tht;; vr\)p~rlJ. TIl\: ~l:"i :,:.:..n.:16,\.!r :,¡ald
a meeting h.", been sched~led with the City of Sunnyv~le next ~~nday con-
cerning this property.
¥~yor Froli~h vas in faYQr
at ~his meeting ünd before
report on the meet1u3 wit~
I could !>e galned by bo ld1:l.&
1
,
~f having the First Reading of the Orùinance
the Second Reading we would have the staff
Sunnyv~le. He cbulù not see where anything
off on this single-family development.
Moved by CouncUman 1rv1ft, secoudcd by Councilman Jackson to reopen the
Public Hearings on applications 17-Z-72 and 17-TM-72.
Af~er further discussion, it was moved by CouncUMan Irvin, ..econded by
Councilman Sparks to postpone applica~ions 17-2-72 and i7-TM-72
to allow time for the pO~Slbi11ty of de-annexation of this property
and to a11o'l the residents in the area to make their plans.
Mo~ion carried, 5-0
26. Consideration to ~Dd Section 6.8 of Sisn Ordinan~ No. 353
regarding off site "ù Estate For-Sale signs. Recoa=ended
for denial.
The Planning Director reYt.ewd the November 17th staff report on this
i.sue. Both the Architectural and Site Approval Coma1t~ee and ~he
Planning Commission reco~Qded retention of present wording in
Section 6.18.
"
f
f.
;, ~~
.
.'
KDIUl'ES OF Tl!E NOVEHBEIl 20. 1972 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
~, Hoved by Councllll&l1 JI'~. seconded by CouncilaaD Sparks to
close the Public HearfllC.
JlÌþdøD carried, s-o
.. ~~",,,,}~
',:'.<.¡"iiI
¿;-
Hoved by CcuncllmaD .Jack.àïÎ{seconded by CouncilmaD Heyus to
adopt Planning CoDaiss1øD .esolut1on No. 1118.
Counc11=an Irwin no~ed tbere,vere no realt~rs in the audience at
this ueeting and they had offered nothing positive at the previous
hearings ~n this matter.
Motion carried, 5-0
ORD lNA."\CES
27. F:'rst Read ing of Ordl"-a:1ce No ° 561,: "A:! Ordina.~ce 0: t::e Cit
c: Cupertino Am~:!¿i~¡ Ordinance 1':0. 546 Relatin~ t.o the
I=;r0\"£!IH'!nt of C~:':-:~':"\·ed Streets by T:-:o~c Persons ~u~l¿!ng
on Aijacent Lar.d. n - r~ad by Hayor Frolic:,_
l~ved b:,- C~\1~cil:nan ~€.y~rs, seconded by Counrilx:.an Ir·:-in t~ ~.a·.....e
O~:iina::..;:: ~o. 564 read :.:; ~itle only and tht."! ~tÎyor's rea¿ing :5
to cor,::::tute the First Jt~àingo
AYES:
NOES:
Council~en Irvin, Jackson, Meyers, Sp8rk~, Kayor Frolich I
~ne
Motion carried, 5-0
28. t:rgency Ordinance 5<>. 565: "An Ordinance of the Cl~y of
Cupertino Amending Ordinance Noo 18 Pertaining to the Con~roll
of Dogs and Other Animals and the Regulation of A.~iDan
Establishments S~~ as Kennels, Pet Shops, Pe~ Groo:lng
Parlors and Menageries. Repealing City of Cupertino Ordinance
No. 408, and Declarin& The Urgency Thereof, To Ta~e Effect
I....ediately. II _ read by the City Attorney.
MOved by Councilman Keyers. seconded by Councilman Sparks to have
Urgency Ordinance No. 565 read by title only and tha~ ~be Ci~y
Attorney's reading CODSt1cate ~he readingo
AYES:
NOES:
Councilmen IrviA. Jackson, He)Oers, Sparks, Mayor Frolich
None
Motion carried, 5-0
CC-136
Page 15
Iles. 1118
adopted
Ord ° 554
Fin;;t Reading
Read ing of
Urgency Ord. ~
a:-136
h&e 16
~. 565
:_ted
,
,f
,
!i
!
".....iing of
t:r¡;..,,':y
'Jr¿. 566
I "~'~
~ .'-::;. 566
,
,
,
,
t
¿c~.:t~d
3.ea.:!i.ng of
t:r~e~cy
Ord. 567
.
-
.
.
,,~"t' - OF THE ...~ 20, 1912 CøT'.....-tJ. KEETI1IG
,¡., '
-,
./
,if
s6c: þ -[."1.i Cbaac11man Irvin to eøacc
, ·;'f
..,. Cound13D. ~~Ir""l1.
- OrdiDaDce~. 565.
,,,,~, ," '-' ','
CouIlCU- Inr1D, J.cksoa~,jÌiÌj~:;¡SPãrks, Mayor Frol1cb
~ " .>' ,; "'~~~.;>;;,,:,:-; ,
Hot10D..,,~~¡'1l.'5-4
,
8.
1k&enry Ord~e 110. 566: -AD Ordtaance of ~he City of CupertiDo
JIIIeø;i1ng Or¿=e No. 002(a) (ZoDfDa Ordinance) Regarding the
hyment of FM$ to Cover the a..e. of the Pre....ration of Env1roamental
I8pact Rep,r:3 &l.i Declaring the Urseacy Thereo! to Take Effect
blmediately.' - r"'3d by Hayor Frolich.
;
¡.
,
:!!bTeII 1>y C"unc~:::.<o ~:-:in. seconded '!Jy Councll!:\an S;:ar:-. to have Urgency
, ~~e No. 50: :<~~ ;y title ::017 and the 1'.ayor's =,ading is to
~~ute the ~:!~:~~.
LTLS :
]£E5 :
Coun.: _: -.~ .:-.::.n, Jackson. ~e.rs. S?arks. ~~.l::ùr Frolich
Kone
Moti~~ ca~~ed. 5-0
:'=-=::::ac-i1:~an Jd':.:~:: . "':'~red whethl';t" 5ec.tio:.¡ ¡ ~h;.:u~':':: I.: ;c.; m...H'U "!" r~C1.se.
~ ~~ested ::.::..;;, '-_::': tonal la..'1g::.age. c.:,uncilman ~'~':::'~:'.':: sug~c~.ted t:'at
~ 1!1ore st~:': :.:- ~ ·..·~ll be put ::::.:0 it.. pErha~-5 ::-.~ :t';,! ~houlri be
"'~.
~e:: '!J] Com:.:::-:: _- .i:·...son, seco:".ëe:d 0; Cguncilrt<!.: ~~.:::~=; to enact
r'%We=.:y Ordi".;~¿ ¿ :,. 5~6 as amendd.
,~~:
, :saœ:s:
~
,
¿
Cour:..: _,:::,!,:: ::-~..·i.n, Jac~:l. ~yers, Spår~s. "_::"'-..'t" Frolich
None
Motion carried. 5-0
I
. 3D.
"
t1rgency 0:-':':-:-..i~~; ~:o. 567: lib Ordinance of t::~ c¡~·.. of Cuoertino
_end in; ~:''''::'<,:'o! :10. 537 (¡¡q:'l:li~ Code) R£?"~.!::1:;· the Pa;"""nt of
Fees to c..~..¿= :,:, Costs for the Pre tarat ion c: ~".: ::cnDI"nt31 r!::?act;
~orts a~~ ~~::.r:ng the Urg~~ 1r38reaf to Td~. ~:fect Immediate1y.~
- read by ~ù"!;r Frollch.
!
I
.
! ~ 1:»y c~u:-'.C::':'l,:: ,:~'::'n, seconded b7 Cou:1cilrnar jrt~:....s::n to
i J)rot4""""e :;Io.~, ~,",;y title 031}' and tho! Mayor', =¿,1J;ng
. -itute the :-::':'0.: ~-...;.
have Urgency
is to
SD:
s::IES:
Cou~c:~~~~ _~~~n, Jackson, Y.eyers, S?arks. ~~y~r Frolich
None
Motion carried. 5-0
.
.
1UNU1'ES OF ,:"£ Y.JVE1GER 20, 1972 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1IøVed by ec"Ddl:!an JacuOI1. seco:lded by Councilman Sparks to
sect Urgency Or.i1nance lfo. 567 .. D8IIded.
,A'IES :
~-.s:
Couocilllen Irvin. .JaclésoD. Heyen, Sparks, Mayor rrol1ch
!lone
, lfot:tOD carried, 5-0
USOLUT10:\S
31. No. 335;: "! Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Cuperti~ Alloving Cer~a1D Claims and Demands Payable in the
Amou,,:s ~n:' from the runds as Hereinafter Described for
Salari~, a:-::' ,:ages for the Payroll Period Eading November 14,
1972. '" -- =i'ad by Mayor rrolich.
~oved by C:·.;-_:~::=..m ~leYJ!:rst seconded by Cou:1cil:-:.an Jackson to
ad:>pt R8$O',"'::: :;0. 3367.
AYES:
~JES:
C::;:::::=-:"~ Irvin, Jacks~:":. ~eyers. S?arks. :'1aY0r Frol i.ch
~\::.:?
Matico carried, 5-0
32. No. ~::>: 0'.\ RMolution of the Cit)' Cour-,"il of thc City of
Cupe':."::::: }.:1.o~·:ing Certain Cla::-:s and Dt.~31':d3 :'\"l\"ab]c in t;-.e
Ar::ouc:, ...._ :rom the Funds as Hereinafter Descrcb",! lor
GeneT'::": .~~.:. ·t:'~ccllaneous £Xpend it.urcs." - read b)p the ~ayor.
Y"""ed by "-:",,;' ":::.1" Meyers, seco:>det! bj' Councilman lr"in to
adopt R~so:,,:i:~ x~. 336f.
AYES:
NOES:
C:~~~~::en Irwin. Jac£son. Meyers. S,arks, ~~yor Frolich
~:-:.~
",tion carried, 5-0
33. No. 3310: ",\ Resolution of ~h~ ("~i.;j C...".,cE of the Ci~y of
Cupen;.:>.> Authorizing Execu~lon "i J,,~~.i: F.xerc1se of Powers
Agree=ent 3etween the City of San Jose, the City of Ca~pbell.
the City 0: Gilroy, the City of ~:Organ lIi11, the To"" of Los
Gates, t~~ City of H11pi~a., ~he City of Mountain Viev, the
City of ~ta Clara, the Ci~y of ~he TOlin of Los Altos lIills,
thp C>ty 0: Sunnyvale. ~he Ci~y of Saratoga, the City of
Cupen ~c. t~e City of HoDte Sereno, the City of Los Altos,
and the Co~ty of Santa Clara for the Bicycle Safety Project
for Sant~ Clara County." - read by Mayor Frallcn
CC-136
Page 17
klended Urg.
Ord. 567
enacted
Res. 3367
adopted
Res. 336~
adoptEd
0:-136
h~.. 18
!es. 3101-24
~opted
",. 3:0:-25
.:i,"'?te¿
'..... :;6l t...sÌ',~
;_~ ca.l¿::.¿ar
L~ts
.
.
OF THE ØEM!lEI. 20, 1971 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
eel by COUDCilDan Heyers, seconded by Councilman Irwin to adopt
ut10n 110. 3370.
~t
KotføD carried, ~
1110. 3101-24: "A 1lesolat1OG of the City Council of the City of
CupertiDO AuthoddDS the Execution of Modification of Agre_t
for Eng1oeeriD&Seri1ces, Crossroads Assessment District Unit 1."
- read by !fayor ;rol1ch.
Jløved by Councilaaa Meyers, seconded by Councilman Jackson to adopt
~lution ~. 3101-24,
Mo~ioD carried, 5-0
35. No. 3101-15: "A Resolut~cn of the City Cound 1 of the City of
Cupert:~ Authorizing the Execution of a~ A~re:~ent 3etwecn the
City ~: C~?ertion and ~he County of Santa Clara for Relocation
Sarv :ce...· -- read by Mayor Frolic:'.
!Moved by Cou,:::è::~n ~!eyers, seconded by Cotlncih.l~ Ir""i:'! to Adopt
;Resoltlti_'" :::. 1:01-25.
í
! Mot:~n carried, 5-0
·
,
·
,
!::;F¡::IS::;2,) :r5::~::::;S
·
, 3~.
,
¡
I
I
i Since the C:::· ~.;.n.j~er said .....e are a'~aitll\g
i~!1 thi$, i:. ".',1:;: -;'0Vt'J by C"un-:il:naa ~~e:'cLs,
. In-in to t3.!,;,¿ :::i~ matter off cale~.lar.
PrI11~-:~~.i:':: Jiscussion rE:lating, to Ord·iI'~.h"'!. ~:'.,. Sl}l: uAn
Crl.:::.},:,:,,:, ~f t:~e City cf C':pp-rtino Pt":':1:;;'it.:n,:; ;':1:Ii!~sfon or
Cr~,1t:::'1 :: Soise Be)'?nd Certain LeveL,;.." (Cl~!'t:i,n',;cd fro:.\
City (:,'.:"-:,1 !:'.o>cting 0: :'ovc=:ber 6, 1972.)
r('f'rts t n\;:1 other agl!ncte.s
.sc~.~:"':\·: b:: C'Junc ~ l"'1;1n
Motion carriad, 5-0
37.. Report -=:1 .:cnsultants for EC'Jno>:1ic - (ene-r.1: 1'1.111 review.
The Direc::r ,:f ?!.:mning and Dt::"..clo;·:1ent ('~f.~rre,t to :1 is r.te":'iO of
Sovec-.be!- 16, ~~:.2. After disc"J~siC'ns ~lith l~ur tir-:.;, the staff's
Irecommcnd.J.t:::1::: ~.\Vlo! been narrc.'...:cd down Lll cith:.:!' t!:c Instltutp. of
aegional 3:",j ~·=:~'m Studies of Palo Alto 01" Jh'V...'l ')~~":'·:lt ReseArch
Associates ~: ~~~ Francisco..
I
'..'
.
.
JlINUTES 0, :;¡:: ~OVE!!BER 20. 1972 CITY CO¡;:;CIL ~ETING
Jløved b:¡ C.~Uaan J.c~. ucø:ICIed by C;'iJnCUMn Meyers to
.tborhe üe City ManaS_,CO aeaotiate a COD~ract with the
&sUtu~e e! Regional aDd'Vrhan Studies, pursuant to the ccmdi~ion
,_tamed 1& the propos~ ~:tbe City and t"at firm's reapODse
I:IIereto. '
:'~
,
C."OU>Cilll8n lrwiD...j~"-, Meyers, S?arits, Mayor rrol1ch
5.>".
.\yES:
... ......:
BD£JøD carried, 5-0
38. Co"si':~ration of alterDatives for f~"~:"g Curert1nc Roundu?
and r.~~rl from City ~torøeï as t~ "ev.al:ty of City
part:::pation.
Y"ne Cit~ :,:::r~cy advised t~t t~is is . 1,:~1 rx?enditure. Nc
action c, :<~:::'rcd by the City C~uncll .: te.:., ",,,eting.
The City ·.1-..1~1:!: rcv,:,coJed h:'s -,;r:'ttcn r-:::- :-:. ,::: t:,15 aat.tC!'. Ee
said th~'~c :.s a good ross1=i~1tJ they ::1". .'....þ fundjng f:-o=. the
U:1iteJ :"~ .:. ~ut thC')· woø't 1"-='1:;).... until ;~j:-~"-'.
39. SL:.' :...ort of rhe c..;>ert'I>'J Cit .:, ~,'.l~ St".rl,,!!
Cc=-_:: ="'_
Hr~. Jl:," ~::..er. Prcsi¿e:t ~f the G~aI, : ,-,-"tte" r,a\'(: .. brie:
report c:-, ..'~ 1':. t::c Cc:::t:ee t....œ& bE"en d~',;,: :".:.:":~t' tr.cir las~
direct'::.":- ~:...~ t¡H~ Cou:-.cf¡. At t:.e bc~':::~ :,-,~ :1 P:'C.fiC II1 th~y
d1vid~¿ ~:: ;he ite=s int.o categ:rlc... ...,' hJ.v~ sent out a dra!t
of an i=;:-::!:lc!ntatit'n r1a:-.. aD~ policy to :'::1.' :"'a~:'t1ns C::"C.is.!o:n.
B-COntr~:. 104 Parks an~ &ecreat:on Cc~.»':~ and asked for
feedba~~. :::= th('~. Non-!- ~s been reoce!''''''''! t:":U$ far. S~e asked
that th, ~.:~-Gencra1 PIa" ~U:"S :,e con,i~,""~ by t:'t' City Cour:ci1
a bloek " 1 the. S:'e hopes tè.e impIc""c.~aLon sheets ·,~11 be
complete: :' February. They ~ould a1s~ 1:"e to add s~e input ~o
the >-yel: ~a?ita1 improve:eDt plan.
40. A~ar:.f Contract, Crossroads AsseS5~'~" District,
Pro;."r 71-2.
(a) ~solut1on No. 3101-18: "A Resdution of the Ci~y
(.:-uncil of the City of Cuper~in' ~f A':ard of Contrac~,
Cr~ssroads Ass.s_t Distric~, rr~ject 71-2." - read
OJ !layor Frol1cb.
, .
CC-136
Page 19
Q{ authorized
to negotiate
con~ract
Curertino
RounJu? !'lay
~ct United
Fu~¿'~elr !n
l-íarch
Or :'s it
Jud:.· Hall 11
Ccals Co:n¡n~ttce
re?Jrt
·
;C-136
?age 20
Ies. 3101-11
Jdopted
7 CJle Deposits
l':arded
-
JWlllutS or THE lIìOV~EB. 20, 1972 CITY COUIICIL .ŒETING
lined 'by CouDciJ&a:1 Jackson, sec:cmded by Councilman Sparks to adopt
&eso1ution No. 3101-18, &Warding the contract to R. J. Zipse at the
Jaw bid of $292.553.06.
"
,ØES:
WOES :
Coanc:11aen Irwin, Jackson, Heyers, Sparks, Mayor FroUch
None
Motion carried. S-O
JŒV BUSINESS
41. Award of ti:lle depos1ts.
Upon recomae~dati~n of the Director of ^dainiõtrative
was moved by ~~~oilQan Irwin, seconded by Cnuncilman
ërJard the Ti:~ ~~p~5its as follows:
~~S of ,~erica $100,000
Ba=_:ay', Bank $125,000
Services, it
Sparks to
5-1. 2%
5-1/2%
180 days
180 days
AYES:
s;:JES :
C0U~':::::~-.1 Irwin, Jc1'=.kscn, ~teyers I S;:Mr~:s, ~ta}·or Frnl '_c;¡'
N'c:\t!
~!ct ion carr lcd, 5-0
Rcql1¿:=;:~ :::,,~ I:1tcrsil, Inc.. for trailcr'3 t~ ~e uc;erl fl.'t' te:"'":;,~r:1ry
otfl~e :~:~~~~~.
, 42.
I
I
t
:~:Le trail.er ¡ ~.oved by Cl''..::~':::=-_~~ lrutn, se:::r..¿ed by C')uncil:-:.1:": StHrks, tCl a:1prrwe
_~~ OK'd ! request fr,,::. ::.: 0:"::; i 1 , Inc. l,.:> temporarily u~,t.". ~<::~t;e tr:a!l'!r"i.
". 3369
:1~..::.en off
_,1 ~ ~ndar
the
Motic~ carrIed, 5-0
cœ;SE.'IT CAL::~-::'H
43. Resolut:::: ';:. 3369: ",\ Resolution o( l:',e 1::::: Council of t~'" City
of" Cuperl:'::":- :~king Its ')rder Describin~ t~~í' ~ollndarie5 Dl!s!~n3ted
as '}~~n ;;-S' to be An~exed to the City d~1 Ordering A~nexations
to the City "::'thout Publ ic Hearin\\s as Pr'vided by La...,; Appro:<b'1tely
1.32 Aores. ~catcd on the East Side of ~~~~ Drive Between Stevens
Creek Sl...¿. .md Oakv iew I.ane."
!tøved by C=u:'!...:~l:L."\n Jackson, seconded hj' Cou~cilr!;:tn ~leyp.rs to take!
ILeso1ution ~c. Jh9 off ca1c"dar u:ltil pr",zcnin" is accomplished.
Motion carrIed, 5-0
"'-
.
-
"~-~7-~"":"I"'"
.
.
e
.,
;
..
,'... Accept.D<:e of aunieipa1 I ~¿w~ -~.:
,
(a) 'i1t:ID~ ApartlleGt ea.pla
.1-"} Avenue -m '" Stnens Creek Blvd.
~~':,:'f~;
~., ~",.t (II) Tzac:t »0. 4824. V 'ì ~. VUleS. Unit 2
'. . ii.~"~ Footbill n-..l ,I àortb of Stevena Creek 111"...
'" ~;ti'tf?'Ç,: " v.u of , "'"
,~,~,~., "~¡;{, ~!;¡' '," '.-, ".," ," " '~~,','c "',',.' .
<" "2¡~":¢":' "," ','I:,' ~.< .
:ii~~~iilby t n....n Hey.r..·. .'DdecJ by Couuc:1lun Izw1A to apprøv
'"1';, :~ "Côøaent Calendar. " "
'."
Jl)ctåD c:ânied, 5-0
.-Er01U OF OFFICERS
'"\s. City S~~f - Nothiq funber.
46. City Co?:::Idl:nen
Councilman J~~~~n noted ab_t 75% of the signs reviewed by H-Con-
trol are i~= :.,5 than ~he allCTlable s~uare foota~e. Perhaps this
Sbould be :a<t= into account Vben the Ordinance is revie~ed.
Councilcac ~~:t=5 would like to start thinking about having another
Tcn."n Hal~ ::,,,::::S early 1973. The Council '-"ould like pèrha?s a !
boaeowner5 g::~? to sponsor it. They asked to have this :entionedi
1D the Cu~.:::,,~ Courier a=d Cu~ert~no Sce"e.
Council!Da" ::-.'::t brought u? :):¡e Sa.~dpiper·s "te::porary" sign.
The PlaMl::g ~::=ector said i: is a rather elaborate tcporary sign'
Tbe1r sig::~g ','ill be futC3e:" discussed when the shoppin;; center .
sign co~e, ~= :~r revie~. ~a:kie Hall, 10629 Baxter Avenue, said
the l1ght~g ~: that teQ~orary sign is blinding. It was noted
those Spot. ~e to be r~ved and some will be,put in the ground.
47. Reco~i:~~n by Mayor of DOn-agenda ite:s. -- Nothing further
AD.JOURmŒ~¡:
lløved by (;':)=~ilcan Irwin, seconded by Councilman Sparks to adjour
che Council :oee~1ng at mfdnfp..
JlDCioD earried, 5-0
APPROVED:
-,--. ----
ArnST:
/a/ Donald A. Prolieh
Hayor, City of Cupertino
1./ ilia. E. bdu
City Clerk
Ct-136
'a.e 21
Conaent
Calendar
approved