CC 09-11-73
.
.
cm OF CUPERTI~'O, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
Te1t1phoue: 252-4505
IUlWUI:i OF THE ADJOUlUŒD RECULAR !mETING OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL
BIUI ON SEPTEMBER 11. 1973 IN THE COUNCIL CBAHBER, CITY HALL
CUPERTIJrO, CALIFORNIA
Mayor 'Irvin called the meet1ng to order at 7:38 P,M.
ROLL CALL
CeozDcilmen present:
CeozDcilmen absent:
Frolich. Jackson, Meyers, Sparks, Mayor Irwin
None
Staff present:
City ~Anager Quinlan
Direc',or of Planning 4nd Development Sisk
Deputy City Attorney Kilian
Deputy City Clerk Pagnini
Director of Public Works Viskovich
Consultants present: Economist Steve Levy
Court Reporter: Marilyn ~:"nno
Mayor Irwin ex?lained this is a continuation of the General Plan
rev1ev. The neetinv. began vith a discussion on the Town Center.
The Planning Director first sumcarized his written report on the
Planning C<-"~issinn's findings on the Town Center. It vas an arca
of high prIority ¿e~ignated as community oriented. lfie Planning
Coamission t~¡ked about the total site as a PD.
The Planning Dir~ctor next summarized thb City ~ouncil's statements
~~ the last neeting on the lawn Center: It is not necessarily
lfatted to 250,000 sq. ft.. It should not include major deparl~ent
stores. Access to Stevehs Creek Blvd. from the T01o-n Center vas
cJ~ussed but not resolved. nlc question of density vas reviewed.
There was a question of the legalities of policy stat~ments tl~t
acco.pany a ge~era¡ p]an. It vas detel~inud that it is vithin the
capabUity of the communit}· to establish the t}'Pe.> of development
aDd al88S to bl! considered.
I
CC-17S
Page I
.
,
.
e
S OF THE sEl'TEKBElt 11. 1973 ADJOOL'ŒD CITY COUIfCIL MEErING
Director of Public 8ørks .,laiDed the street pattem proposal for
lie Tovn Ceater. the nv-'" _ lUde by the City ~n t" look at
lane viii-ills and 8'- Id.tIeftiII& of the inter_don of 1flgbvay 9
St_S Creek Blvd. Two aketc:hcs were placed on t1:e bulletin board.
said... vU1 p1:ohablJ eddnà ounehes to 8 I... ualess transit
es iD. It _ld be.~ .~t!\r.o.ical tó) take all 50' £roa one side
ather than 25' fEOla each s!de. Be said It is up to the City Council
decide on Wether tt Is t~ frea the east or wst side. SiDce
transition has to be aade, it would probably take larelays Bsnk and
rthem Ca11fomis SaviD&s buildinas.
Director of ?ublic Vorlts said that on Stevens Creek Blvd. it is
ot a difficult probl.. because we have 120' right-of-way. We can go
WIt to a 10' wide lane and still get Level B traffic. On Highway 9
they are not going less than 11' lane widths.
ith the above proposal we vould be taking something less than one acre
f Cali ?ro~rty, but it will be taking most of the existing buildings
along the east side of Highway 9. The Director said these proposals
f 6 and g lanes do not include bike lanes.
Council=an ~eyers said the City woul1 have to very seriously considcr
the tra:fi~ necds before going to 8 lanes because it would be taking
s~~ very .~11 developed properties already in the Town Center.
Tbe Director of Public Yorks said we must first determine the levels
of traffi~. You have to first take care of the intersections that
cause t~e ;~:tleneck. He said the grade s~?aration proposal has not
yet been "~vcstigated. ïr~re is also the .ossibility of having the
inte.secticn without any left turns.
.r. Levy revie,~d the Core Area Decisior.s by the Planning Commission.
During the discussion of tbe regional center, a fuli fashion center
was pr~senteJ, not as an addition to the regional center but rather
instead cf a regional center. Everyone ha3 contended that two regional
centers ,",,'\lId probably not be feasible; you would get frag.nentati0n.
Ir. Lev)· said the 50 acres with the two high fashion department stores
would be a ~all regior.al center. The Pla~nlng Commission recommended
that the PD for the entire parcel would ~ave a nix of 250,000 to 300,000
square feet of commercial and the balance ia some type(s) of residential.
It see~e¿ tc him that if tbe prope~ty ~ere split it would be logical to
consider c""""ercial development of the Cali and part of the Northr.rn
Califorr.ia Savings property and some other uses for the Chuck and Torre
propertie~. The cOllllllUnity seems to reall~' want the City Council to try
to achie,·c s""",,thing truly unique on titis ,orner. There is a big
differencc ~ctween having just a cow~erc~31 development on this corner
and socethIn~ that really stands out. 'é'.e staff has detailed infor"'3t Ion
0" the Old ~Iill developo<CDt in Hountai" \'"c·~ t ;~t is avaèlable for
referen~e.
·
I
KDlUTES OF
.'-
SEPTÐœER 11, 1973 ADJOUR.\"ED CIty COUNCIL MEETING
CC-l75
Page 3
JIr. Levy sai:! tbe difficult qaeåtion is whether or not you split
the TOIIII Ce::ur properties, ,. are going to require tbe 8_ care
aød ordiaance on the c_rctal ad otber uses of the properties.
~ proper .....id,,& of tlw! ordfluDce requiring detailed usage is
_t 1apcrta::. Ve would lwYe to get an agreeaent IROIIg the pro-
perty owners !or the lIOat potIlt1ve mpacts. It would be better
_ically for the property OIIIIers to develop togetlw!r.
1Ir. Levy sa:: it is up to tile City Council to decide if the ob-
jectives of t:ö! c_nity c_ be lIet with development on 30 acres.
Before t:-..o: ,~opcrty is decided upon, we should go over the image
of the en:::~ intersection. The Planning C~ission did the Town
Ceoter pr~,<~:ies first and then came back auch later with the
corners. å~~~ they CaDe back to look at the corner they felt
there .ere ,~:3tantial negative impacts at the intersection. He
said "pa~;c' '.'13 probably a poor choice of ","Ords for the northeast
corner ,,: :....i.: intersection.
Counc l~¿~ :'o~~on said cost of the audience comments are still
fresh ¡" : O' :'"ds of the City Council so ,e!laps if the Council
gave the:: _-o:~ations tirst, they could t!len go to the audience
a:ld hear: _,:: -,:!r t\;·sti~cny. He has so::!€' ¿..:-u::'ts in his mind as
to the ~c::,: :f total develo~ent at one t~~e, although he could
see no FC: .," :n zonin;; it all at once. :;-,~ Planning lJirect.or
"aid th,' ;: cO: .ould like to :tave it all ,l;;""ed at <,;Ie tL:¡e, but
:'lot nee.: "':-:.:- ~ ::: all develoj)eG. at one ti."':lC. T:'H2' Plar~ning COIr..-lissio 1
would 1:';';', : -¿ ~nti['e 50 acr£:s planned a: .:-¡:~ tiC1::: but it C0'..11d
be a p~~>i_ :,~elopment. Councilman Ja~ksc" sa~" ~hat if anyone
of the è..... ~:. :-.:r$ came ia õtit.h an overall p!a¡-: witi10Ut agre~rnent
of the CO',," :t could crea~e some proble~~.
Council¡-;;.:: -'<Y"rs said he would like the C,?0rtunity to study the
Old Mil I ~,., :~p¡:¡.,nt pI ans. He is interestcJ in development of
the mix~, _,;; in our To.~ Center. Mayor Ir.in agreed.
CouQcil~c' ;~~:ks "aid he h".5 had tÞe q'Fr:caity recently to
travel ::. :'~ ~ Fremont 2re.~. and h~ was quite: i~pressed with Planned
Develop:-l:".: : '-:~re. He 1o.·"u.id 1 ikí" to see .a :-.:ix of uses in our
Town Cer.:::, L.,d they should not all be res:;'rèd to develop at
one t~~, ::. ~ thin 5 years, it appears to b~ an impossible
situat i,c. ',; City should reconsider. Ma""r Irwin was hes1tant
about F": :cc; .1 t!me 1 im:'t aD this. The ik;,,,t y City Attorney said
this ti=.__ ~ _~:~ could result in serious ~r.:~l'-=:1s.
.
.
Œ-115
,Pace 4
j
MINUTES OF THE SEl'TEKBEJl 11. 1973 ADJOUR.'iED CITY COUNCIL HEETINC
Councllaan Frol1ch. -.14 the 'fIND Center's PO OrdiDånce should describe
types of ~rcf.al aød other uses. The property owners then have the
right to cœt! in and ask the City to revise the plan as their. plans'
becoøe .ore precise.
Councllaan Jacks_ sa14 he caøerally agreed with the thought of going
ahead and draftiDa the ord~. because January 1 will be here before.
we know it.
.
Councila3n FroUch said these ordInances can be fairly general or
fairly sp~ific. ø. feels there should be some way tbe City can
assign a bill number to a project, as the Statc does.
Mayor Ir~in said tbe vordiDa of this ordinance should not be so con-
strictive that It must apply only to the Town Center.
Council~an Sparks asked baw specific we can get at this point. The
Deputy City A.torney said t~is is a question 0f reasonableness. The
courts ~a.e been very lib~ral in allowiug cIties some latitude in these
cases.
COllncil::3c1 'Nlich felt that a really th-:mghtful developer '"ould ".lnt
to c=~ :c, .md help the City draft the PD Ordinance.
Counci:::.;.:. :rolich yould like to see the policy statement as brea.d
as pC:5~:'·::~ :0 allow an imag1nativ~ proposal for this propert.y.
The Co,,::c:: '.ould be sending it back to the Planning C","",Ission for
revie~ ¿~¿ :~ come up with a list cf restrl~ticns.
Hayor ::"':n felt the 16, 12 and, 10 unit per acre densIties ·.ou1<I not
3110... c:::c;'l :atitude for a unique plan. Ct'uncilman J:ickso:\ said he
would ,," '.:1t1t to exchange :!IUcll higher density than 16 units per acre
for ~e~::i~sþ etc.
Council:::;:: 1:"r0lich s;old he could vlsuallz<, a sitU.lt [en where there is
no resi":t":1t, !al in there at all. For instaul..~e, then.~ could be a. cOC\!tlunity
hospita: ,'1' theater. For thIs r........son, he is reluctant to put any
boundari", .'n the r.. at this time. Councilmall Jackson said that unless
the C"""dl !lives the Planninz CO!:llllission so"," guidelines, .:hen January I
gets h"rë ... will probably get applications i0r cOl~ercial in one area
and resi¿<ntlal in another. There ",as the f"",ling that the Ordfnartce
~hould ~on:..1in the phrase.....It should not eXI..:eed a certa.in density
unless Ü has a unique approach." The Assistant Clty Attorney reviewed
the it..::s r\!quired under the Gover:t:neut Cod.. for a General Plan.
In sU~.lry, it should give some g..neral indicatIon of land uses and
major r~a¿s and public utilitIt!s, densicy .lnd building intensity. It
is not a rr"dse plan. Coun..Ulft3n FroIich "aid the Council has Indicated
we want scv::"thing creative in the TOlo."ß C.'nler. ¡nth that, it should be
returned ~.) the Planning Cœcoission without .my const raints.
.
.
.
KIN\1TES OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 1973 ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CC-175
Page 5
The Ecol1Olllic Consultant .aid the question appean to be whether
the Council wants to foøally or informall~· cOIIIIIIU1Ûcate with the
Plannin& eo..ission on this issue. He saw thre'!! major points
.:_ing out of tbis discu..1DD: 1) Overall plan on the property;
2) KixWre of land uses; 3) Bigher density in order to attain· a
particular com.unity goal.
Hayor Irvin called a recess at 8 :50 P.M. The meeting reconvened
at 9:l4 P.M.
Attorney Tom O'Donnell, 1700 Hollywood Drive, Los Gatos, said he
represented the Cali family. He is troubled with the implementa-
tion of what the City COuncil has said about the Town Center. He
said they have no particular reason for checking with their neigh-
bors as to their plans; they only can speak to the 25 acres. He
asked how there can be an overall zoning for properties owned by
diÍÎerent people. He could find no' precedent. He wondered how to
proceed without sane guidelines as to the !'ishes of the Council.
He wondered if they could go to a developer and say they have
zero zone..
Mayor Irwin said that from the standpoint of the property owner,
the easiest thing would be to sell the property and l"t sonebod)·
else worr)· about it. He as:ted if they I<ould rather h"ve a "clean
piece oi paper" or some very specific guidelines. ~Ir. HcConncll
said it is typical of developers to have contingencies in the
contract such as zoning, ErR, etc. The property mmer is in the
picture until the zone is established.
Mr. O'Donnell asked why the entire 50 acres has to be planned at
one". Why not plan the 25 commercial acres and require the balanc
to conform with that development. ~~yor Irwin said the Council
is giving the opportunity to the developers and property ownors to
cou:" up with a very unique plan. The "'hole point covolves around
wor..ing \òlth a larger parcel. The ide:! behind I'D is to ha"e a
large encuþh parcel to .~rl with so it can ue innovative, with the
proper controls. CouncU,-,an Frolich s3hl there is a difference
between this and other parcels in the City. The Council wnnts to
draw up an ordinance including how the City wants it to look,
along with input from the developer. The .-hol.. point is to kce,p
,this as open as long as we can for the benefit of the property
owners and for the community. The option is ah,ays there [or the
developer to cite reasons wh)· he would 1 ike to n¡ilk.. changes in the
plan.
CC-17S
Page 6
,
KuCltIl!S OF TI"EPTEMBEll 11, 1973 ADJOUR.\'ED cl COUNCIL MEETING
1Ir, O'DolIIIAIll 8414 that 1II1en he has taken polS in to city staffs
preriøasly t'" baYe spent tbouaands of dollars by the time they
.etput the ctaff. Then additional thousands of dollars sre ,ally
lIpIDi t~þt *PD é~ou¡h the City Councils. Councillllan Frolich
saUtthit,CityCoancll haS clearly said they would go alOU& With 250,000
sq. ft. pl'" ~b11'aa1... You don't even have to caaa in with
~aw1. vfth;the first' proposal.
Hr. O'Donnell said they will be happy to maka theaaselves available to
work on this ordinance.
.
Hr. Levy said one problem has cOGIe up that will came up time and
again. It ceaes down to the fact that he said they will come in with
SODa tenants along the froøtage and sometime later will but in the
balance of the cOIIIIIIercial.
Mrs. Ann Anger, Monta Vista, said she is confused by this and the
previous meeting. The developer came in with 520,000 sq. ft. for the
Town Center. It was pointed out this was too much. She would very
much like to see the 48-50 acr<,s kept intact. She was hoping the
City Council would take the same approach with this development as
they did with the regional center. ~~yor Irwin said Mr. Ifhitted made
it very clear he was not interested in less than 520,000 sq. ft.
Mrs. Anger said the d~,eloper aiways wants the very most; she would
like to see a compromise here.
Kayor Irwin said we are trying to put together an ordinance, keeping
the 50 acreS intact. It will b~ semi-specific, but not so specific
that it restricts the developer. Hrs. Anger th~n told them to speed it u¡>.
.
Alma Dippel, 10402 Soaerset Court offered citizen input on drafting
this ordinance. About two years ago an apartment complex was proposed
for the Town Center, with much resistance from the citizer.s. She
said she would hate to see that repeated. ~he does not see how you
can take 4-12 units per acre and have mixed uses. She would like ~o
keep residential out of the Town Center.
Juanita McLaren, 22101 Lindy Lane, Cupert ino, said she has spoken
previously about the problems of trying to k~ep this property as a
whole. In the meantime, taxes have gone up c"nsiderably. She docs not
feel she can find a better tenant than ~:eur.la!'l Propert ies for the
development of the Town Center. She a:>ked the Council not to discri!Di-
nate. We have the developer with the knm..how, but we have to g lve him
a chance. She would like to hav~ thi5 sent back to the Planning
COIIIIIIission for further study of the ~eur.lan pruposal. Hayur Irwin
said that Mr. Whitted would have to he willing to discuss sOr.lethin~
significantly less than a regional center. Councilman Jackson said he
understood Hrs. McLaren would like to have this go back to the Planning
Commission to be conslder~d as a third alternative fer a regional
shopping center.
.
.
MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 1973 ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CC-175
Page 7
Mrs. Mclaren said Hr. ¡ bitted made his prescntation in February.
Hr, Arnold told her that. he was' rctained to consider the Vallco
Park and Hariani Hall regional shopping ccnter proposals.
Hr. LeVy said Kr. MlúJ;ted had ample chance to come forward with
his plans, but beøever did. The City Manager said that Insofar
_ be knows, there'" DO discussion of a major department store
:in the Town Center cliKU8sions. He was talking in terms of a
junior department store. The statement was also made that this
could be compatible with either Vallco Park or Mariani Hall re-
gional center. FrOla £hat standpoint, there has been a change In
the pre~entatioD of the proposal for the Town Center. Councilman
Jackson said that froa the standpoint of the community, we need
to study all three proposals.
Mr. O'Donnell said that at the mecting 1a~t fall they were told
the regional shop?1Dg center would have 3 to 5 department stores.
This was an impossibility to them so the)· decided to come up with
something compatible rather than competitive. There is no way
you can put 5 departoent stores on 50 acr~3.
Nancy SaIlan, 10141 Bilich Place, Cupertino, said this is an
ir:-.;>ortant iR£ue in tha:: the Planning Comissio" never had the
opportunity to evaluate the TO\m Cellt"r plan as an al terna te
regional shopping center. She fcelfi that Hrs. NcLaren has rr.ade a
fair request to have ::his returned to the Planning Cormnjssion for
their evaluat ion. Th:'5 is somr..ttin¡:; the cor.~r:mnity is entitled to
---a full hearing on t.~.i5 al tern<1t ivc.
Councilman FroUch said the Planni.n¡: ConmisRion had the opportunit
tQ make any choice =!-J~:" "",oj shed. It 1s not nec(~ssary tc> have a
proposal bef"re ma.l<in¡; G designation of la:1d use. He feels that
all the reascnuble al:.e~:1&tivcs ha\'e been explored. The City
Council did not il:1pose t!1e requirement on the Planning Commission
to C'onsidcr specific si::es for a regional center. It '..ras very
thoroughl}' explored and rejected. IIc "auld not be in fav{·r of
sending it back to t¡'" Plan'1ing Commi.ssion at this point. This
enti.re core ,1rca t.:ill t'f: refcrrcù h'1C.k to the Planning CO::L.'TI.ission
and at that time they <-culd, if they chose, restudy th.. regional
center matter.
Mayor Ir~in said Sear~ isn't going to move. The traffic patterns
:nc not going to cha:-¡¡;e. Councilman Jackson said the onc) main
dif £ercncc 1'h: sees is that we ended. up with twt."\ departm.ent stores
in all thr(_~ locat:v:15.. He ~~lIld 1 ikc the Planning Cor.¡:1:Ï5sion
to take a look at all th!'ee posRibHities for a reg;'on:ll shop\>ing
center.
.
'.
_--175
ce 8
KIBUTES OF T1ΠSEPTEMBER 11, 1973 ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING
'DIe Deputy CIty Attomey - . ed Coune1lllan Fralich that after the
CU:y Cowell aa!tes a dec1sioa ~ the reco_endat1on goes back to.
de Planning (;.;)ØII18s1oo tbe7 ...,. thirty days in vhich to answer.
, CcMIDdllllaD !f¿yers agreed tbat:.1è: wold be unwise to tum this, back
..ell the entire core area ... back. Councilman Spuks said his
wote vould not change here. Be _ted that 40% of the ~rc:lal
vithin Cupertino is in Sears at the. present time. Th1s is one reason
llla1 the regional center sJ-,..1d be in Valle;' Park. Whatever regional
ceBter we bave should be located in Vall co Park... it is almost pre-
4estined.
.Judy Cooper, 21906 Hyannisport Drive, CupertIno. asked if it would
be possible for the City Council to discuss what they would like to
see in the Te",,. Center. The Planning Commission began in this way.
When you start to make a aajor decision you can get bogged do",,,.
She would like to see the individual Councilmen discuss "'~at they
e:wision ;':1 t:,~ Town Center. If the CouncIlmen can express this, It
,",auld be hd¡>:ul to the Planning Co:nmissioners "nd to the property
u...'"Ilers.
I
I! Mrs. Cooper 3s~ed if, i:1 discussing the PD zone, it ~ould be possible
~~ speak i~ ~~nns of p~rc~nta¡es of specific u~~s.
:~ the m3tt~r oi tot~l ?~?u~ation, Mrs. Cooper ~sked hoy ~e can
. é.:::'drcss g::,¿o-::'~ic plJ~Ulali'=:l in Cuperti.no ~..ilen density ranges arc
.
:'·t'iog desi.:::::;r.~d.
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
!
i
I
!':rs. Coor~r .l:3() want~¿ t'o ¿iSCU5S housing. The Housing ElcMcnt 0.£
::te Gt"ner3: ?:3.n hag :'.:::en ¿:a..":1 '.;?_ She r~~ls it 1:; i~?ortant for
:~-\1s City C'.~~:..:il to ad¿r&::s~ ¡ô..... incorJ.c housfn?_ 'fha lC·J inc(..~~
'.:>usi'\g has ""t been fac~ored iI1to these decisions. CCU:1Cil"'3n Jackson
said the C:::·- Council h:s n.;J: sent anything to disa~ree ·...it!1 anythinR
::--~e Plannir.; C\.lrmlission has said._ He feel:; thr nc~ t)r¿i:lance should
~e startEd ,-;1 now so it C~ a.:co".Ul1odate the c"nceots pr",sented by the
?l3nning C~~is~lon an.¿ la::è.o-Jt1crs themselv(t$. Perha?c; =.he staff
=~ould St.:1::-: a""w to draft. a:: ordinance.
!ifr. Noor B~ :::l·.olala, 20252 Rill Avenue, Saratoga, ac::ked if thpre has been
a study by :.:-:e Traff ic C0~~..l1t.ant or st~f:a!; to the lan~ rer¡uirer:wnts
vith trans:t being off",red in the Ccunty by 1980. The Director of
Public Wor~s said the de·..el:>pers indIcated ...hat they thought th" rcduc-
!ion of la::~ r..quirements ...auld be. The CUlInty l~ saying 20-301.
reduction. ~~. Blll"",,,L1 scggesteù that perhaps the traffic situation
ø.ay not be d~ bad as dL-n.cnstrated in pre-.¡ieus meet inKs_
.
.
!nJIuuS OF THE SEPTEMBER 11. 1973 ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL KPZr11lG
. 1Iir. Levy said the questiOD has _ up before where there are
:~:... types of cOIIIIII!rcial tba~ ~ City might want to a1101f. the
~. --fng C--i...~ion dceidec! daM: they eouId not see any øeeI for
, Mllil:ional kinds of comm.erefa1 acl:ivity in the City of euperd.DO.
"~ 'Dey bao: difficulty in coaiJla up with a definition of these CflIe8
, ., _erdal.
-....>
JIr. BUlawala said he could pr_ide at the next meeting a lisl:
_ profit__king activities.
... Billawal;;. said when you pol: a Planned Development together you
are aaking it casier for the "&uy with a lot of bread" to buy cut
the other fcl:è~. He said deaocracy is not perfect, but it does
consider pcc;:¿. If people are being hurt by a certain type of
1'rii>, this ~~,'~:d be taken into consideration.
~. Billa.a:~ ":~O wanted to c~ent on the 50-acre limitati~.
1.:1 throuf:: "'.' Planning Cc:1issi"" l!Ieetin~5, the 50-acre figure
""45 used ;I~..':; -~'ith 500,000 S';.. ft. Howcv(~r~ this is net 2 ::"oze~
f::',¡t·.;re.
~..z~.-':.r Ir""¡~ ~- .:...: there are scr~ restrictio!~s C't .\rea 6C.. 1~e
?:a~~ing (~~:::~i~n rut ~Jas~ ?ü=lic Zonin~ 0n that propê~:Y at
:.:.: c.ornt'r .: ~~":-re k:cr.u£ a..:-.! Fa~ific3. 1 f thi.s is not D"'.J!"c:-.as~~
_. t:..c Cit", ',:ill be cC';1si¿ê=L: :n the sa:~¿ context as l:~¿ :-t:st
:.: t:-¡e To',::. ,: .~~,- propert:....
~::. TC'n)· :-:.::" . _:-..J,. 12985 Ten ~~: :";óy, Sarat\'f.ú, sniel h(~ i~ r':'''J7:-
:.~r::.€:d ab.=-'.: ~ pr':"7(:="t.:: :-i::'-~ tied to th:- results of t!'".é ::c¿
iss1,;~, \:h': .:~_ ..:..1 òt'laj' 1.:':= .3 :.: 4 months. H~ referred t.~ ::i.s
:£t:.er r.f ..1".. :;, 1973, re::'a:''::=''g to his discu:~sions \-lit~ t~e
:,,:,,::ef Di:r, -: . ~f } ublic ;;C=L= Yarborour.h. This prorerty .Ja.£ to
be a~quiTl:": :-:-_ _-::·_LJ-l~..172. Ee :-é";¡;~stcd Pr,"")f('~~ional/Adrr.:i,,::"st.=éiti-i~
z='=li:1g on L.c ::-:-,.'¡'IerLy.
C:r.::-:cilman ~~c ~:':-=: sai.d l:e hoa': :::'.;¿:ed the P~~1tlning C'Jm!,~:i~si::: 's
~::=H,lte5 ¡.¡n.: :-.':':": a prece¿e::1:.. ::e asked if t ¡~('re is anyt¡.in~ :;-~t'"
C:;.,¡::,cil C~:: '....;._.11y do here t= a11c.''J the S¡U\t' L'1titudc. 35 h:iS be~!".
t:>ne with ~-:. .::: ~í"rinp's R~:1ch.. 1h!' Plannin~ !Hrct.:tor sa.i": the
Q-Jasi Pub] i, ,'~'nr. ,",ould gC':ë t:.e city the intent but it ¿~c, r.:o~
bi:1.: thp rr..~;-"':""':Y o'...u~r. ~y=~ lr\.iin said tb..it until the Ge~t::-.a.!.
Plan is adi.....:-:~.: .....(! cannot a:L.J;:~ a position ..")n the To\.,'Tl CE:n:'er..
1t !-.as hCC'i~ .-..:.:....;\led this :'::.. E0:':tg to bt~ QUJ,ii Public, ..·~i,:!-.
:nclud.c:¡ l'~-;:,--;~i('lnal 3nd ~~¿:':'c.:.. In the event the bond :'s.s:;E:
fail>. the::. :-~r:y OWïcr ca:: s....":.::..it an aprli.....ation.. This ·.~t.:lè
:.-..:.c appn,;;' _o_.::~:: 90 days. C:....:-.c¡lman Frl.lj tcll sllgg~~ste¿
!!:'. Huso] i:~~~ ;:.......:ee:d o.;ith his T~7.oning .appl:c~ltion !1c',-l, rat!ler
than wait lor ,~¿ r~sults of t~e bond issue.
CC-175
Page 9
.
.
.
BUIldS or tBE :¡udHllm n. 1973 ADJOUL'ŒD cm COUIIC1L HEETIS
&.._1 IiwIa calW ., f ..... _ U 107 P .11. the .ect1ìl& reconven'"
_ U:20 Poll. ..
..... ., c:oaad.... ,"u~. .11 c -""-eel by Couuclltun Sparks that .
r__ of the .'r_ - -... .,å.....rty at the comer of Torre Aveaaa
... ..1f1ca be 1D1C1aht 117 t1aa City instead of the property WMr
able. ;. is bolcU.. t1aa 1C4,J n,. for the City.
JIoCtoa ~arried. 5-0
"
Kayor Irvin an~ed the 4t.casslon would next be on the sub-are..
left 10 the T~ Ceater area. He wel~aoed audience parti~¡pation.
Area 6r - 3-a~r.. parcel aijKent to Saratoga-Sunny"/ale !Wad. south..rly
of SilveraJ~. OK
Area 6D - th" lOO' dee~ :..t 0:1 the s""th $lJ.. of Pacifi.o... 1djacent to
residential. OK
.;.rea 6E - T:Ü< h 3 par co: t<>at i5 basicaIl, "1 .. s!"gle f,,-,ily an'a
" at '.11itney .'·'>:me, adja.:~t to sinr,le fani!j' r,-,:,!p",,1i:!l, :O,CCC 5q. Ft.
4 - 7.6 units per acre.
,A=ea 6A - Off ft!rry W'a~t. 2 acres between ~x.l.:"2t iag ~."\::i.b:. t..; ?ÞJt,iur.1nl
I a...1.d ~i.·ti,:",..~ ..:'OIZIercia.l. :'h.e Plaanins COC'......i5:ü,:n is rí.'C'~;-~-·..~:-¿ia~ t!lat
" 'be cor.aer":!,ll, as Is :.he rest of thd.t strip. T~~c Pla!'l:lÜ-.¡ Direct"c
added that t.:1~ Plannir.J Co::::is51on indiC'at~d th\!rc i:; no r~:1$on t..'hy
. the property ironting en :err)· Way should be anyth[¡\g be;';des reslJentlal.
OK
Ar"a 6B - This is at th.. ::\ce~section, fronting on High'""y 9 and
Pacifica, adj3cent to p~::fes3ion,1l offices and rel3t"d cc,"""ercial.
OK
Mayor lr-..ri::a asked Cor c.C':::;;:.ents fro;.¡ the ."1ud1ence. There. w~rc: none.
P.e said he ",ill put togF,~t-.er a tentative schedule for d tscussions of
each area. The Charlie ;oaer property wilL be discussed iirst on
Thursday. A preliminary grade separation plan might also be prepared
for the ThursJay night ceeting.
Councilman Frolich
~allot arg~ents.
~he Bond C.Jun$c;l.
is not tru... The
the printers.
ask.,¿ the City Attorney what the posit!"" is on the
The ¡;,,::uty City Attorney referred this question t<>
Council"",,, Frolich read .1 pllrase that he sal.! slt,,,l,
Deputy City Clerk said they have alrea¿j" gone to
t .
m:a.'Tf:s 0, ,¡:;: S¡:rn:;';¡¡LR 11, 1973 A1J.IOUR:;fJ) ClI'y COI;;;CII. }!f.F.TI~:G
Council::!.l:'l ::"Yi'rs anr.ou:1ced that he ,~ould be out of to'in on
busi:'lcss t¡'" follo·..in,;; ..eek. The Deput)· City Attorney said it
is best to have all fi-:e C!)uncUr.\en present at these J:leetingz;
b~¿ever, it !s le~al to have these mcctinas with a quorur.\. He
advised any Council:o.,n that vould' be abs('nt fro!!! any of these
.eetings to c~" in and listen to the tapes.
1J)J0t:R.\~::::r
!".oved by C<c::dlt\:tn :!t·yers. secondt'à by CouacJ Iman Jackson to
adjo'~rr: t1,c ,-,.-..cing "t 11 :42 P.~I. to Thursd1!Y, September 13, 1973,
at 7:00r.::.
Motion carripd. 5-0
APPROVED:
Isl Keith Eo Ir.-iÏn
H:lyor, -City -Of ë~pr~!'tb;¿;----
A: 7[$T:
/5/ \':!~1. :~. !~\-J.cr
CitY-Ô-;:-,:;:--
<:C-175
Par." 11