CC 06-17-74
.
~ ',~,
';"
;¡;'; ,
,..
·'''.{,-,v'
-
>~.~j~
,~ .
.
e
e
Ctn' OF ......uxIRO. . fP'N '01' CALIJOIIIIA '
10300 1bu.. A._".rø. J.:~.~."UDø. Califonia 95014
.,.h,1 .....; 252-4i ," 'I. "
,~;~.:::/t
«-41~
....1
~
",
""ilaUJ1I401'ÍU citr œøaçn.
:"ÏI;,ms" comien. .ftt&tIÌnrÍI em ø.w.
..... 110 ~1A ·
. ,
.
~ii4~'··..·\(:· .,~.'
ULU1'I TO till JtAØ." "
.~~:;
llaJor Spam cal1eð tJUa ..tin I to oreler at 7:30 p... vith the Salute
to the nq
lOLL CALL
Counc. present:
CoUIIC. absent:
Frol1ch. Jackson, Meyers, Nellis (7:37), Mayor Sparks
lIone
Staff present:
City Kanager Quinlan
Director of Administrative Services Ryder
Director of Planning and Development Sislt
Director of Public Works Viskovich
Director of Pam and Recreation Butler
Assistant City Attorney Kilian
IlIh1JTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS
l. Klnutes of adjourned regular meeting of JlØ\e 4, 1974 not
available at this time.
2. Minutes of regular meeting of JlØ\e 3, 1974 not available
at this tiae.
C(Øt1 NlCAtIONS
3. a. Letter fr_ c.;unty of Santa Clara that the City's appoint....nt
of a repreal!Qtative to the Transportation COlIIDission would
expire OQ JuDe 30, 1974.
b. Letter f~ SUIII11vaìe reco_,nding the support of the County
Hanagen' Group to the ABAG GrOlltt. Study Projzct.
c. 1.et;teø for and against reaional shoppina ce:ter.
t
¡
p cc-%J.S
t--2
~
; '.
: IUIIVlA 0' 'III' J"-', 1974 CIn COUNCIL MlErIlG
.
d. A,".iC ,díac te_ 15 (CupertiDo UdCID Scbool Distdct) !Ie
I" -~Ji4::'''' dae .... "..-. .
.
,
, ,.
tiIIIIIe.C1a1Þ of ~~,to 1Io1d __ n.1II.ðI"C.
, '~::LÌ np___~wa1ð be 't"Iì't~
'. ,...,... ......t.øt..'. coald DOC'" ,
'~~ '.
". .' ."."~' '
cOåIi&~,~".~1IkI1...·:tétj;ftA1IPotDt CouaC. frol1c1a .. the Cit1'. npneiarad_
to .",c:iiaot1"of.sauClaft!s TrasportadOD o..ûa1OD. S.cCTf-t" c.. II~.·
Jacka.. ' "
.
,
,
;'-{.,~~~
,,'-~;.II
~;
Jfød01l card". 4-0
CouaC. lfa1eta .,.,.. that the Counc:1l ao 011 øcor4 .. eupportin. the p.-telOD
I of the County Kmtapø' Group with reference to the AB&G GrOIIth StllllJ Project.
Seconded by Counc. Jackson.
ifotiOD carried, 4-0
Counc. Meyers aoved to ;remove item 15 (Cupertino thion School District)
froa alenda. Seconded by Counc. Jøc:kaon.
Mot~,on carried, 4-0
Counc. Meyers moved to file letters pertaining to) regional shoPpinl cent.r.
Seconded by Counc. Jac:kson.
Motion carried, 4-0
Counc. Meyers moved to authorize warrants be drawn to Bank of America
for $239,S69.l9, to the Santa Clara Valley Water District for $ll.2S0.8S,
to Ada1ll8, Ball & Wenzel for $790.9l and to the Bank of America in an
amount yet to be submitted by invoice for park and City Hall debt service
requirelllllnts. Seconded by Counc. 'rolich.
Motion carried. 4-0
Council alrced to hear residents card usage under item 19, report of
Parks and Recreatioa.
PUBLIC BEAlIINGS
4. Pœlic Bearinl on Ordinance No. 627. Uniform Buiidinl Code:
(a) Second reading of Ordinance No. 627: "An Ordinance
of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter l6.~~ of
the Municipal _Code by Adoptinl the 'Uniform Build-
tn. Code'. 1973 Edition and Appropriate Exceptions
thftreto. ..
", -, .:'" 'i~'~,'f,l,,' ..'..
.'
,
e
.
.u.unwo 01' DIE .... 17.' U~,C1'I't,CÞlllCIL IŒETDG
ClC-21S
r... 3
.~ '
":i
~. ~~. UIIlJrdtM (
';~~þ:I::;'~--
'0;".
;,~; ',"
1.... fnIt' tIíi
,
tp:";~::
"~~~ . "~7,~'
"~';'~ .' ''I::' '
. :'i'.·,'.-'"
l11ryec11ty Coac. _en. Mrnîr"'ti1 Couac:. Jac:bCID. to haw OEM..-....
110. 627 nad by title oaly, ... ,.. Clem's naMII' shall _tt.cuta the
SecODd leacl1nl. '
JacbCID. to c10M ...11c 1Iead.Dp.
IIott.CID carded,. 5-0
lfotiCID carrie.. 5-0
Moved by Counc. Jac:kson. secaulecl1ty Counc. Heyen. to eaact Orð1Q.."1Ice
Bo. 627.
!lotion carried. 5-0
5. Public hearina on Ord1naDCe No. 628, Vnifora 'ire Code:
(a) Second reacl1ø. of Ordinance No. 628: "An Ordinance
of the Ci~y of Cupertino Adding Chapter 16.100 to the
Municipal Code by Adapting the 'Uni form Fire Code',
1973 Edition and Appropriate E:A:ceptiona There~o.'·
Since there vere no COllllll!Dts froa tbe audience, it vas Dved by Counc.
Jac:ks on , seconded by COUllC. !feyen, to close the Public Heafing.
Motion carried, 5-0
Moved by COUIIC. Jac:kson, sec:cx1ded by CoUIIC. Meyen, to have Ordinance
No. 628 read by title only, and the Clerk's reading &ball constitute
the Second Reading.
Motion carried, 5-0
Moved by CoUIIC. Meyen, seconded by Coun~. Nellis, to enact Ordinance
No. 628.
Motion carried, 5-0
6. Item 17. No. 3492, ''Resolution of the City Council cf the
City of Cupertill<í, State of California, Adopting Hazardous
Fin Area Maps."
CoUIIC. Nellis IIIOved that ~his itea be continued as per "taff'. request.
Seconded by CoUllC. 'rolic:h.
Motion carried, 5-0
-
.
.
C:C-21S
.... 4
,~
.R:;US or 'l1li J1III 17. 1'74 cør alUlCIL IlUUJlG
''-'-:
.]
t. MUc 1aead.1a1 CID orM . '- 110. 634, lIatioaal BJacCdcal ewei
,~ ' , , ~
" ê~ >Secâicl'iI~' :,¡ ,H,,_~J.tT_ 10. 634: "AD,¡r1f ""'"v ,l
.,' ,," ~~,:~J~'i~..'..~'.,"~ :r't.~~!t~.!!~~~::
.' .... Hl1ilt' ~i ., . .".' ,.
!;Ç\i~*{r. .' .... ,,;{;j.<r,'·' .
þf."i/3:;~:t)I~me DO ~. '''''~;lì~<dIe ....,...ee. it ~"'w..·~ r..AlIt.
: ..Ut.",.aacœdeel by CoiiIè,.~I-~."~ c1_ hbUc JIe..t.....
,""
.¡)-
<'(
Hot1OD c:arr1eel. S-O
IIøftd by Coœe. ,J~1tIOD, lie-'ll by Counc. Nellis, to háve 0rM"-~
So. 634 read b-¡ titl~ 0011., sacJ the Clerk's readinl shall caaatt.C1ICa
die SeconcJ reacI1nl.
Motion c:arrieel, S-O
IIoftd by Counc. Jac:kson. sec:oaded by Comc. Nellia, to enact Ord"n.n...
JIo. 634:
Motion carried, S-O
8. Public h'!aring on ApplicaUon No. l-EIR-74 of the Westfield
Company to consider Draft Environmental Impact Report reprd-
ing CODSt r'.Jctton of two (2) 32,340 square feet !~dust rial
buildings located at the southeast comer of the 1ntersect1C11
of Prune ridge and Tantau Avenues. (continued fro... meeting of
June 3, 1974)
the Director of Planning and Development noted the use perait had been
denied by the Planning CoDØ1.ssion and would be heard by the City
Council on July l. It was supested it Jdght be appropriate to
continua.
Counc. Nellis IIIOved to continue to the next regular meeting. Seconded
by Counc. Keyers.
Motion carried. S-O
9. Public hearinl on Applic:ation No. 3-EIR-73, to consider Draft
Environmental Impact Report regarding the proposed constructiOD
of Vallco Park Regional Shopping Center located southerly of
and adjacent to 're_ay Route 280 at its intersection vida
Wolfe Road, extending s_therly on the westerly side of Volfe
Road froa s&d 'r_ay ~ Stevens Creek Boulevard aad ezÞDCl-
inl southerly frOll saiel 're_ay on the easterly side._of Volf.
Road to Vallco Park \lay. Said proposal 1& tl) construct a
regional shopping c:eøter vith ,a total of 765,000 square feet
t.n addition to the ezistiDg Sears facility. (Continued froa
_eting of June 3, 19n)
...-;-"
.
-
.
III.IIlIId 0' TBB J1IJIB 17. 1974 cur COURCIL MEETING
, . . - -'!;...,,~""'...... -- ...... .. ....
: also I;h' _~ t_ on whare it .boaU h. 1Ibat
,øn ~ clìs~.: , ,,>,.¡j¡t. d,Í8~',' . > > :,~'ta1 IIIpact ~'f, tt .... facto
f." ~~~tbis ftPOrt~~". ,,<~'" ' " ~e;'... of the 0piId.- ~t the
'" z ~_ anel ~,~~:æ:.C1I8.eel, but the... pelll1t bacI
'., ~> ,: :.~t b_ ia.úcI~ :~-~!Q1A ~4~tbi. vas correct. .. &c:.aion
.{ Y",..WbUld be held at .._____ ffnf tbiI usa pandt, not toIdlfat.
. ,>, ' . ,- ~ ,¡.: "
A '.
, >, 111. Director of tl'-i"l aJ!!I Deft10paent referred to the a......·_t
,,:. ftn preparadon of.. Døfl: ..........vuMðt.l lIIpact Report by DaDlel,
..., JoImson I11III _"-".11 (IIIJH) for the City of Cupertt.øø.
c&. ....cations had be_ øcet.ged froa persons who did øøt apee
with thia report. 'DIe ~a1taDts for the City had filed vrl.tten
statements on tht.a parti.ca1ar nport. There are anbers of the firla
present to answer ay qaeatt.oaa.
Counc. Nellis asked for a œ ftt froa the City Attorney _ to
1Ibether they would be deddinl whether to accept the report or
vas it complete enousÞ? !fro ~i_ said the City of Cupertino
¡uidelines which are a RYaÇ of the State lav provide that before
my lovemmental action .., he tåen on a project vhich lligh~ have
a sianificant impact on the environae1t, a public hearinl vill be
held on the EIR on the project. Alasically, he said, what they auat
find if they approve the EIR is that the report contains adequate
description about the project as proposed a4d then aske a decision
as to whether to approve or disapprove the project. The _ting
tonig 1t is to decide whether they have received enough input fro.
the EIR to make a decisioa. They _t decide whether the environ-
_tal impact as been aitipted sufficiently, or whether the project
h_ a significant illpact at all. Mr. ltiUan said if the couac:1lmen
felt there was insufficient data, they could send back to the con-
sultants for IIIOre infomation or could have a new c:onat.ltant provide
vith a new report.
Couac. Nellis asked bow the fee would be paid on so_thine like this.
Will it be held until ElR is found complete? At vhat point is the
fee paid! Mr. ltilim said he did not have the contract before him,
but it vas his opinion that if the proper services vere not per-
fOrMd properly under the contract they vould not be obl1.ated to
pay the fee. C,m:c. Nellis ascertained the fee had nor. been paid
yet. She felt it vas better to clear the air. She ref&rred to
~ts about DM.ßI and possible conflict of interest. '.::cuac. Nelli
lAve background of EIR c...tttee and their duties.
Mr. Sisk reported there vere 50 cOlll;ultants considered whic:h vere
aarrowed to three. Counc. Bellis asked the basis on which muM
vas chosen. Hr. Sisk said it vou a committee decision. Counc.
Bellis aslted th. coasultaøts to c_nt on ,their qualifications
md the question of conflict of interest; i.e. prior contact vith
OC-215
Paae 5
-
J
>
ì
í
t
~
¡,
HIRUTES OF THE ~ 17,
.
19',; CITY COIIIICIL HEErIlG
vith LJt'D" Gordoo.'~ it ·they ver.:deve1opeie,fôr'VallèoL'.ark,
¡ Mr. aaarl.. T. B1at.~. DÞiaI011 Hauler, saicJ Hr. pantuso vould spa_of
, tbair qaa11ftea~1... . Vith respect to c:GGfUct of 1nurest. he alenecl
to a latur vnthD ia'¡)_"I7, 1974, which Co.IDUcI on their coatnct:
With GorcloD .... 'LJ:Gt ....1IId,ch atated there'" no c:GGfl1ct of 1Dte~t~
~. Ie repeatad tllat ØÞK ...·not and is not f.Dte_ted iD ..s1 p1MDta wilen
there is cadUct:. .
~,~ i
" :'
,; ,
,:."
Mr. Uair nlenacJ to,utic:1aa vh1ch ap¡)earecl1D the nevapspeø. Be
.aid th81 an Dot cIne1open. have Dot been dewlopen and have no'
intel1tion of becomøl .....!open.
In _r to Co~. Re111s, Hr. Blair said the)' vere professional cleslpeØ.
Counc. laWs ..ked if IIf.JH vas involved in 8ff1 vay vith a project in SSDta
Clara CoUßty. Mr. Blair saicJ the)' vere srchitects, enlineers aacJ plamaers
f-,x a redewlop-œ project ~4 Santa Clara, but this is the only ODe. All
other projects are professional ..st pUII8Du. :ranaportation projects, etc.
They vere selected as architects for sports areoa.
Hr. J. Pantuso, 3250 Vilshire Blvd., Los AIIples, said their qualUications
are quite diversified. involvin3 tea. of assorted professional skills.
Clients r3nge froa gownment agenc:1es to private sector. He nllMd
:several of their preseat undartakings. Be said the Vallc:o study vas oøe
of relatively ~rate signifig.¡nce in teras of environmental scope.
Hr. Blair gaw several other areas for which they are doinl lIb.
Counc. Jac:kaon said then had see_d to ~e ..... conflict of interest
betveen fira OOil1l work _d also doing evaluation work. He asked if
DKJK had warÙl!i on' say other shopping center'1mroldng Lyon" Cordon. Kr.
Blair said no. Hr. Blair said the y had brouFt tbis out before the
contract vas siped. cd opportunity given to vithdr....
Coœc. ~n aaid be vas Dot a Mlllber of the El. C.,..ittee. He c:1ted
n~ndati_ that ~ out of co..1\.:_. DK.J!1 was far abedd of
other conceras. DKJM vas ch_ fer exp;lrthe. DKJM Invol_t
with Gordœ Ly_ vas lass than 1%. Be beUe_ under conditions pres_t
at that tå8 ü.y chose r1cbtly 1D dec:Uir4 there vas no conflict of blterest.
Counc:. 'rolic:h ...conded by Counc. Keyen .aiel. Be regreted difficulties
that had been ca.-ed. but felt the dec:1sion vas right. He .aid it
should be ell lbasized that the _n this .ort of thing is done the _n
difficult it is lOia. to be' to finel soaeoae who is COllpletely re_vecI
f~ the projec~.
Counc. Jac:k.œ .aia for the rec:ord it should be pointed out that wh_
Hx. Blair cffered to vithdrav. they vere half-vay throuF report.
Counc. Nellis said he,: intent in raisinl question vas to brinl up what
vas being printed in the papers and written to the Council and give
the consultants an opportunity to clear the air.
~
.
e
e
I
. CC-215
Pale 7
,¿,
t
':
^
IWIIT,n~S 0' mE JUNE 17. 1974 CIn~UNCIL MEETING
~
,
\':.
t"'-
\¡:
¡^
_or Spaxts said he vas on the c~tt,..e that picked tIM firm.
Expertise vas needed in diverse areas ~.r a larp project and
tDOlt a consulting ftra of this "anitu.-!,1 to provide such needed
expertise.
"". ~'
t, --'"
>
'die Planning Director sUlaested the project manaler for DKJH could
respond to questions.
·Hr.Pantuso said he would speak on behalf of the tec:bnical teaa.
Be noted there were representatives of each teaa vorltinl on diiteren
aspects of ErR present who could answer additional questions. He
referred to a S9-pa¡,;e addendum which had been .ubaitted, entitled,
"l!esponses to Comment.,". He noted the major issues raised by the
c:itlzens were traffic impact, noise and air pollution. and general
cDq)atibiUty of shopPt.n1 center with adjacent residential areas.
Counc. Hel Us re-emphasized this was not a use permit hearing but
a discussion of whether inf...rmation contained in El1l is cDq)lete
and correct.
Counc. Mo!yers asked to have new info:1llation explaine~. Hr. Ken
Heald, traffic engineer. said change in figure. on traffic not
associat..d wit.. shoppinl cenU~ ',.. Wolfe Road and south bound
\-olume at peak hour on 1-'-110 is .ub.'tantially a directior.al change,
vith little volume change. He said t~." "",.t h.porta:tt information
to c~ cut of this chanae was the .i~ificant increase in traffic
on Wolfe ¡¡"'ad north. The ADV on Wolfe Road wo·.ld be differe!Cot unde.. '
the two i'r~pollals (:iJ1dustrial versus S]ICII'!>ing center),' ""t under I
peak hour situation ¥ovId be very s:bailer. r".r. l!e:lld referred to ,
~~:; ,Jµ:-., ~.4,,1974¡eap0D5e to.C~. .'ad:son'. letter of May 29.
COunc. Ja~~.~ referred to a difference in figures for traffic
.outhbound on w"lfe load cros.ing freev3Y. Mr. HeAld said this
di.cl..pancy i. yet to be resolved. ~ the b""is of a count at
Volfe ~oad they .howed 2436 and at e..ent!~11y the .a.. place, the
Ih vision t'! Hi""way. .h_d 221'.. Be could not explain it !Other
than that they were taken on different day.. He explained how they
had arrh-ed at the 2070 figure. Cour.c. Jac:kson asked if this ....
type of difference in totals applied to other street assignaents of I
traffic. ~r. Beald pointed out they had not chanaed the total
.-unt of traffic. but directional distribution during peak hours.
"¡'"
In answer to Counc. Jac:kson, Hr. Heald said the total volume is the
sianificant thing reprding air pollution. Th~ important thing in
design is the directional .plit and they have revised their d.ta
to take this into consideration. Counc. Jackson referred to State
Division ,;! !fi¡hway. report that off-ramp for cars coming off
Volfe Road southbound toward shoPpinl center versus tbose coming
off freeway auat be siø;nalized, and that would be the critical
point for intersection capacity.
}
.
,
.
.
1ß]I1JTES 0' DIE J1JNE 17. D14 ern COUNCIL IlEETIJIG
Ccnmc. Jaå:sœ asked if . r-I-o;'~JS1s had l.~en aacIe of illPact and'inter-
section atiliaatiœ crosalDa 1blfa Road and off rup at Volf. load lI...d
œ new chaps aade. Hr. Ileal. said they bad not takèn a DeW analyeb,
but he p/.co II the Divis:lal of BiaJ1ways had and that they _n satis-
fied the}' !Law a WOddD& ~ II.
In answer to Cowc. Heyen. 1Ir. 1Ieå1d said all free rlg)¡t turns would
be eliminated.
1:IIe metotins vas opened to the p1bllc for c:o_nts.
Ms. Alma ~pe1, l0402 ~rset Court, Cupertino, said sT1e had read the
ErR. S¡,,, ""....nted on st~_t _de by \lalter Ward and Keith Irvin
that Cou::.=. ~e1lis and Prolic:h had been elected to the Coœc:il ~ecaU8e
they vo:"j :or the regiooa1 shopping center. They were elected in
spite of ....:t". r.ot because of it. She then referred to answers she
had rec,,:''''.;! from MJH, c:&11ing them ",.nanswers", noting £ilures
are easy:: juggle around. She referred to changes that had been
made in'.:.:" "f shoppinl center since its ?r.:>pc:;;al seven years a;:o.
Ka. Dirr~' 'o"1::1dered for vbom does Cupertin" "xi:;;t? Is the City's
£unctic:: 7::':arlly to serric:e the people who live in it or is it a
vehicle ~~ ·.~ich developers may make a lOL "f ="ney, She said a lot
of peoF:' .Jnt"d no shopping cente= at all ,ut realized that possibility
was 1",,;; ;:::e. so they were willing to c,,::;>,.,,:::.1se. She said they have
had a ~:: ::' "rong info~lon and lack "f ::1:"""",tion all slanting
the c,':::~ ....:.:<~ of the Ellt in favor of de·:e:"<,,,-,nt. How can this EIR
then b" : iJ.:id tool Oft which to malte a .:!r.::.Ü"n; Cupertino :Dust live
vith tè.:. :e·:etopment for a lOCI time and j,t i~ going to change living
cond1ti:-.>, She asked the Council to pIe...." .......1' asOtinl questions and
challe.";::: :'ipr'l!S.
I
I
Mayor 5;_~ ~k.d for docu=entation of fi&ur"~ contained in her letter
and Ms. :",el said o~.r 7SO aicnatures CJ.~ .out of the core area.
Counc. ~~~:i5 ~uestioned state=ent that pe:,le ~~o signed petition were
people ~-~": :'ad voted for 5ellis SlId Froli.:h; ~.... Dippel said most ...r
the. hac!.
Hr. Hal :;&=?'!r, l043S lIorvicb Avenue, t:u¡>"rttno. said the people seemed
to be q:.><:>:ioaing the inte¡r1ty of DH.JM. Ii" was a member of a Board of
Directors "ita had employed DM..'H. The most d.1:!aging thing they had had
to overe.... w' th Pla~D& eø-1ssion was mU~'s report on their project.
they had ="uoÜ DM.»!'¡; iDte¡rity to be beyonc! :eproach.
Ms. Je~ Cusb.an, lOi40 K. B~Y. Cupertino. referred to the questionable
veracity:: \.tUH and Vo)11co c!evelopers. Petitions of 800 people had been
received, aIs" .letters aDd phone calls. She commended questions that had
been raise<! by the Coœdl -.bers. She said it was time for the Ccw\cil-
IM!D to mÜ.e good a.~ c:~a1p proa1ses, She rderred to pen<!ing legislature
AB4064 ..":'.:h vould hsve ... [ØJK ineligibl" because of conflict of interest.
the only "table vay to .-J.øu,in public confidence is ',0 direct staff to
.
.
.
.
-P.,3
0' .J'13! 17, 1974 CIT'f 'V''''- "". JŒETING
CC-21S
Pale 9
'.
" thta In _ speak t~,"_1or . center no laraer th..
, lIqaue fee::. liÐ.y otbe~,~ will dest1'OJ Cupertiaø
.:1.tace to lift ad assUft,;tIf'pn1-10D111eDt vith elected IIIId
ôffichls ~f Cqlert1no. CIJ;y baff1c studies indicate that
. ~ of 10.(.'(0 can pas!! iD ~ of hu house every day. For
.,~ ~ resi~ts th. center II.- DO posittV'! assets. She askeel
W ð. Co=:il ~j'.ct t~e IKJIf report and start thinking in teas
4 .uc:h SU::U l'nneyarel tJpe ceDte'.c. Ms. Cushman then distri-
- ,:¡aoI copiu :: œr statement to "'.4 press.
__ ~rcy Ba=. :092\ Pepper Tree Lane, Cupertino, said she
_ .Jy res=:~¿ conf.1.: ct of ~t &be sees here, when Walter
~ aDd I!L~ ::S~ a Qst IlUltitœe of words to p~' the wool over
1M citizens' :7<$. She noted I:he averag:!! citizen cannot take the
d.e to rea¿ r~ $:~dy every iss_ that comes before the Councilor
n-tng Cc=""::::. That is the very rel'.son f)r having appointed
...aJor elec:..: =":=,,,sentatives. She referred to all article in the
_.._per i:: '.-::::': ';31lco Park ainiaized DMJM as a developer, but
aile said the' ,:: :cew IM.Df and Jlilson Constructicn Company are
jo!Jltly cons: :-...:::::; the vacant central core area of Santa Clara.
SIIe referre;; ,>: ::oe develop;:e:tt in Hawaii in ~·:1ich mUM and :'yon
~~rdOD are :: .:: ;"" She vas _zed at shoddy report, considering
dolo exp~rtÜí :::; :inn is su;oposed to have. [w" though this
~ort i~ i: .,. :~::::on biased. it says there ~:ll be an increase
of pollut.1!",:. ,: ~~; ;lnd tuffic ,,::'11 increase :,:' 55: in the area
of 280 a:,J '.'::." '1:"-vay. ~se fi¡;-ùres which s:,e believes to be
~ tell he: :, ,: "" builders are o:.llvious tC' ::,e ecological well-
beá& of t;,< :-,.:c:<. This is a significant i::'8Ct. ~I'I. Bauer
a*ied that s·, .:,..' ::re<' of hear'.-:>& Mr. Ward c,,' a~C'ut all the
~inga h. ':. 1: :o:d..d and the cost of delay. He earn!' his salary
~ the c1 t ::'..> .: Cu¡>ert ino h....e: tù.en time irè:: thei r jobs, thei r
f..tlies. t;-".: :..::.s for the ¡:...t 13 months ..'i:¡'.out pay to repeat-
..uy tell t::. ~:=::: and the ';&ll= developers t;,,,t they do not
~ a cent~: .,: :·~~rtino.
JIr. E.eith I....·::, :::<':'3 Bayvood. C~rtino, note¿ t;,at the reporter
tn. Mereu"'-'",.,, 0.l3 been notable in reportin~ ...hat he thinks is
_ and fs~:, :: :<?~rt many of the things that are very important.
.. clsrifie;; ::, 5:3:ement with regard to the election of Counc.
.11is and r:.:: ':. !fr. IrviA said he must tak~ the credit or
¡,:a- for !u'C:' 1.5;':ed :he CotmCil to continue ...ith the contract
altar they ::l~ i =".:in:; of Executive Session 0:1 F..bruary 19. 1974
~ vb1c:h tin< :: '~$ voted 4-l ~t there ~as no significant conflict
of 1Dterest ,-_:: :'ès;>ect to n..~"!I. Be then px¡>lained what va" c:on-
....red si¡;::~ :::~-.: .md how this decislo:! ¡.ad been arrived at. He
.... further :z'::";r:und for the selection of D~ after considert.ng
daet.r invoh"¿",,:::,: ::: other studi.es and dev..lo¡>ments, Mr. Irvin
_tad the E:;' :¿::;.:ts some City figures and that an EIf :annot be
WEt.Cten to s:oy :: ~s good or 1t&4. !here was approximately 1% conflict
!
~
I
;"'/ ,¡,¡
"'~', ~',
,~~;
'f
'. .
.....,.(25 OF m _ 17, 1974 em áIIIIm MEldjG
fit iDtexeat Hlaced ap1nat aw.vdd-w:l.de reputation. .. said q...ti_
~ ~Dffic, IIOlse, noxious "....:.cc..re all thb.. wbich are .....tial
. "." CO" ccmsidencl. Tbae had .......'1M.d at last ._r. 'IlL: c:oaacil had
>f~, ,¥cJed by \est jadae-ut: that: '~ would be aD !.pact. but these _ra
-,to' iìiíiÇ." s.art_ as have beeu .....-:~ 'ton1a1U:, _4 tbers _re .tti..tiDl
èí~tanc:es 80 these i~cta '~d bè lhed vith. Hr. IrvtD sua tba
IiJpe of c8ll(la1p vbich is bdnl aD to discredit the developer, IIIJH.
~ builder as a v.., to babe the _tar oJr destroy the c8llter entirel,
& _I. as 1m I 1 as they would be to ignors tM fiaures .bovn in the
ED report.
í
\
I
I
,
I
i
I
1Ir. Don Lauritsoa. 228 Greendale Way, '2, San Jose , d1strl),uted copies
of bf:; remarks. 'Ie referred to a docUlllellt sublll1tt1!d to the Planning
Department entitlo!d, "Vall co PaEk ..atonal Shopping Center-Draft
Zlrdrrnme:1tal Impact Report: A Critique & Suggested Revisions" which
outlined in detail the many areas which are incomplete in the Vallco
c1raft ErR. (be was the Mitigation Measures and Altern3t1ves to the
project whiò. are left incomplete. Such consequenc.es should be
determined i:1 do!tail before construction and these mitigation .....asures
written int<- t.'1e use permits as conditions. Another "as the many
effects, b<,th l<,ag and short-term, of the project on sur(~unding
cities whi~'1 ~øs nat discussed in any detail. None of the flannt~~
Departments ~: surrounding citie~ were consulted. A third was the
environmental :=racts being insufficiently addressed, such as
floodinr. ch~~~:~~rtstiC8 of the site. How much addltional
surface run:::' -.;ill be created by paving the area? Can the existing
storm draj~> ::1 ~he area handle this increase? ~~at ~ill the loss in
Z;roundwatcr :~ ~ith the reduction of rnlnfall percolatioa? ¡'~ere is
the nearest ;,~::Lttion pond with respect to the proj"ct? Another
vas the n0i~t! ~=ra.:.:s of this project. Noise ~asur~:'!lcnts 1I:tr;'!re not
taken duril1~ :-~>i h~ur and therefore do not represent the highest
levels of ":'$~ .~lch exist around the sire. The specific routes,
frequencies JC,j : i:\i! schedules of delivery t rucks should be accounted
for in tht! :::;.. It ...;an be seen from two .lolse cont\"lur maps chat the
build opti",,, ;;iE have an acoustic effect on the nearby residential
neighborhc"'~. ~ "",ise buffer wall. e3rth berms and landscaplrg should
be written :~:~ :::e final EIR, and into the use pcn:tlts tn order tt.at
these r..~id,,~:"s be protected from the increased noise. lite most
blatant voi~ :~ the noise sections of the EIR is the absence of any
aeøtion cf :~" ';¿neral Plan Noise Elements which are required September 1
by the Stat~. ~ill the shopping center satisfy these and fu~ure g~als
of these Nois" El"aents? Mr. Lauritson asked how the $67,OOO/yr. for
1Iitigatioo "",øsures would be distributed; what are the mechanisms con-
trolling its ¿i~tribution and use?
~. Margaret :. Harame, 19735 Drake Dr., Cup~rtino, said 280 is just
~ind her bO'JSe oII1d the Wolfe Road exit begins three houses down from
hers. Future signalization from that exit and aUO'oIing no right hand
turns will cause cars to back up; what about carbon monoxide fumes and
further noise iroo cars sitting on this freeway? She &aid she did not
,
t
,
I
JlDti'l'ES OF 111! .JUNE 17, 1974 CITY COONCIL KEETmC
CC-21S
Page 11
--
- :,....~,
,';, ....,if this hael beea~,..~.teclin, the EU but it should be.
l:Þ8Jr;hour traffic r11kt't~'.Ís'badted up. She said sbe woulel
.11Ir.tÍ. the lIboppinl c:eatei;~1]u.
,.."";..-,',.',
- >."'., ~ ,.~'
-' "" .-"'r,...... ,>:'
111'...111111" Post. 1:.0. 54. .%:at;\~.~~. Tree Ct., Cupertino, said his COllllleDts
_re pœ11sbed and'cI!ft act. anel he did no~ feel he needed to
upend further on tha. '>co.IIIII!Dded the City Council for doinl
lID excellent job of repretteatiDI public IIDd askinl good questions.
Q1e co_t with reprel to BIIt, in early deliberations on the
shopping center, d1sc:ua.ion of dial-a-rlde came up and there was a
..mer of 'ord Motor Company who made a considerable presentation.
Bow it seelllS that as of Septeaber of this year we will have it. It
will be a little different and a little better. This concept should
reduce the traffic flow. He asked DKJM to what extent they hav..
used th.. County planning figures, if there are some, to work in
with the traCfic es~imate.
At 9:l2 p.c. a break was announced with the meeting reconvening at
9:30 p.m.
A discussicn waS held on when to continue hearings, Counc. Frolich
said the things being said are significant things that should be
acd have nor been included in report. Proble"",, br,'ur,ht Corth
tonight ca.-, be responded to by July 1. Counc. Jad<sC'n noted th"rc
was a pn',"~eèural probl~m in that Plar..:1ing C,-",n:::J.is~ion will he ('00-
!"1nuing t.t.",1.-jnS on use pemit on Wedn(.·~day e\'cninr: and .ans\.,'("rs to
q~;tions }('in~ raised ~houlcf be avöiL..Lbl~ to th..·::-; then. Coune.
t\ellis .a'.; ~h~ \:ould like to get ,,11 <¡,,,'sri "as ,"I tl,at C"'J"-¡ 1
has so C0~~;Jlt3't5 can repl)- to them. Shl..~ "·.1:1tl~t! to gí\"t.~ pt~:)lj ':
eve ry opp,'rtt:n1ty to be heard.
Since th~r~ ,",'ere no more CC1:l-Oeots from th~ .Iutllt'nce. the Coun~11
then di recteJ thei r questions to the cOl1suILmt...
Counc. Nellis referred to page 15, parar.raph 1. in t:lR "hich said
concentrati"n of new vehicle activity just south of WC'lfe Road inter-
change creates a potentially daogerous 5i tu:!t i on, asking what the
dang..rous situatior was. ~r. Heald s3id this h,ld b..en d....U \lith
in document dnd was concerned \lith ped,,!<trian tratiic crossing
WolCe Road. )i¡ot enough attention had been gi""n to pedestrian
facilities ~~d this had been passed on to Vallc<,.
On page 24, four inte:qections were reCerred to and Counc, Nellis
asked them to be identified. Mr. Heald said this reCerred back to
a previo", study City has on file. It was ascertained by Coune.
'rolich that the intersections referred to were Stevens Cr..ek access
to Inte~state 280 and Lawrence Expressway, and \Jolfe Road with
Homestead and Stevens Creek.
ic-21S
12
r.
.
¡
1
;
.
-
.
lI1.uuS or tilE m.1I 17, 1974 CITY COUHCIL IŒI'flH":
'~ ,-¢
:;-;CIIII~ of ,... 164, tile atate*t 'I" ... that c aiditioaa1 aCl'Ílitb1HlllDd
:--:{'.'~.111', '.Vo~=Jt -:"'~."...tf.é. '.' J.,:'~, ~::::':-= =-.~. ' ~~.~.,.:::!::~
"', ',.l1ia ...tt~h~1't""~ then VIN1cI lie bip ',.'lt1Gäi. .
", d said tbù _ÔÜ; _cts_ baa bea _..tael by tIIe'}.'", ' iIIr}of .
".' · reñaal to,~'''' ript t1In. .' '" ,
~",:;',' .1~r:, " :',,;:'~j:"J,~,,,, , ',. :
~.~~.cdre1l1s theD af~ to ,.ae 177. rable 52, perta:Ö!f.q to. '
"O;ffr61t. CøDtribllti._'.t V.11eo Puke She qœsti_ð C1t-;r'of capeE-'
~.; eœtdbllti.aa, ..1<iil',1Ibeø the infonatiaa c_ fzaa: aDCI if
Cafertino vas ..tinl c:aQtrlbution due to t.prowaeata neededfo~
.hgpp1ø1 center.' Counc. Heyers said he thought this vas'm ezpruaaiOD
of _It has taken place up to tbis data. The Director of Public Works
.aiel this vas correct. This vas whAt: was put in on Ho_toù aa:c1
Stevens Creek when it was widened sevenl years back.
Counc. NelUs said two areas of concern to her were air and noise
pollution. She had brought these two questions up over o:nd over
again aå e Plar.ning CODlmissioner. She had been told it would be
covered by Elit. She asked where the air and noise tests were conducted.
Hr. Heald referred to sub<:ontract with ESt, Incorpor~~ed, Sunnyvale,
CaUfornia for Air Quality ~d Meteorological assessment of report.
No air samples were taken. Counc, Nellis said on-site air studies
snðuld have been made. This i~ a critical area and samples should
b~ taken in residential areas. Counc, Nellis then asked why only
CO measure:Di!nts were taken. ' Hr. Heald said most impact of center
is traffic related and the best ind1cator of traffic pollution is
carbon DOnoxide - 90% comes from automobilo!s. Most auto related
impact COCleS from carbon lIIOuox1de.
Counc. Nellis then referred to page 37, paragraph 4. no~inl this
indicated .11r standards are being exceeded In area right now. Hr.
Heald said t!\ls was correct. Comc. Nellis asked how EPA £it in
'ederal standards snd Mr. Heald said Cupertino wculd have to decide
whether Impact was severe enough to stop project or whether economic
and socl0 factors override it. There are new guideline.. that will
take effect on a voluntary basin in July of 1974 al,,1 permanent basis
in January, 1975 when all projects will hsve to comply with the..
Counc. Nellis noted there were Federal standards and Bsked tÞe effect
on human bei:1gs if standards are ,nolated. Mr. Heald "aid there was
dat3 available on the actual physical effects but he did not have it
with hi..
Counc. Nellis questioned if there was a reporc on effects of lead
aDd other air pollutants. Mr. Hedld said lead Is ingested Into system
and it is hard to determine how much lead came from autos or breathlnl
fro. roadway. Counc. Nellis referred to a report that more children
,.,. ,~Y
-
e
.
JII,IIUU.:o OF mE J1JR!: 17. D74 ern OOUNCIL HEETIRG
'1i.~
!'·.offed f_,Ji.::l}~f~:~ fi.a ..'o"~_..dd
"'¡" aoc. ~Üfi.i.t(.fl·,~. tÞe. '/ ,':""'Í," ," " ~i\;',"~
~:'. .' 11-' ~f. ,,<~>,{~'i";t<~,;t:il,:::,: "I!O:::- ,':~'"~ .,~. ~"::f!;' , ,.
~,," '" ''rF:''~~
t;,,,.te-,tb.'
itadarcls said the ~,~ N ,~;!~i.~~~:~fi>~'¡Á~H.
~ , ' .' """':- ',\","':",. , ,~:3:~,: '7 ,~
:,i.QlUlac. Rellis ..ked in ':;''1..-4GÎi to.øoi8:. how rc.ùáb~~'. 15-
,.11;.. '" ' ' ,'~ ' ,''7
'." 'ldnut. readinl at each, .tad.oa. 'She determined tbae;".ø all
hken on week days. ~.. &:a1cI said the critical thtlÍÎ is you are
lookinl for abatement q-.l1ty. Counc. Nellis noted· that ac:c:ord1nl
to Table 7 on page 45. an readings were taken prior to the peak
hour. Hr. Heald said the peak noise hour does not alWays correlate
to the peak traffic hour. eo-. Nellis said it seeaed to her that
. _re reliable :œtbod would be to take samplings at various times
of tbe day on several days a week.
Counc. Nellis reIerred to Warren Elementary School report on page
86 which said this scheul nOlI has current noise and activity levels
which are extremely undesir3ble. and yet report says tbere viII be
no serlol:S E'Hects on !>chools. Mr. Heald said traffic going north
from 280 ~~uld not raise noise levels at Warren. Counc. Nellis
asked if t~e length of noise period vould not be extended because
of the sheer volume of cars. Mr. lIeald said the hours vould not
be extended.
In answer to Counc. ~ellis. Mr. Heald explained Table 48, page 138.
Counc. Nellis aske~ what the situation would be viLq regard to
noise lE'vel in residential area to the west. Mr. Heald said that
would de?e~d on whether a vall vas built. If the vall is built
there viII be no accous:ical impact on the residences. If tbere
ia no w.ll. the first COlI ,~f homes will be subjected to a small
cøise in noise level.
In ansver to Counc. Nellis, Hr. Heald said Bullock's uses gas
truc:ks with exhaust under tr.lck and only tvo deliveries a day.
::Ounc. ~e¡ers questioned why their tables did nut coincide witb
BUD standards. Hr. Heald said their tables were based on criteria
of 'edel.al Highway AcIrrlnistration. He explained EPA and HUD
.tandards.
In answer to Mayor Sparks. Hr. Hesld said a l2' vall would abate
... fumes from autoaobiles ad trucks with 13' stac:ks. The l2'
well vould also help abau freeway noise fro", residences.
CC-2lS
Pap 13
,
I
-
e
.guu:! OF till Jal17. 1974 C1'lI œmrClL IIIIrIIG
~ ;'...
"',"'"C,
.~:'
;F!~::: '
:'~1~':t
,.,<:
<.
f~
:,¡L.
~
,
-.:ounc. Nellis referred to Counc. Jackson's sUllestion for reduction.
!fa. Petersoo again referred to alternates section.
In ans"'I!r to Mayor Sparks. Ms. Peterson said if 200,000 sq. ft. were
caken out they would have to start from scrc.tch. Counc. Nelli. noted
that would be Ii regtoilal 'centertheD~ Sizes of shopping centers -
vere discussed.": ···.-.u~.': ...,.. . ..0_' :..
Counc. Nellis referred to page 153 and the statement that there vas
little difference in the total craffic generated by either the
cOllllllerclal or industrial configuration. Mr. Heald said this had
been ~, changed-" in the addendua, but still held true in 'Peak
hour traffic.
Counc. Nellis said the next series of questions would be on in_
to center. She asked vhat Sear's income to Cuper.tino was in te~
of tax revenue. Ms. Peterson said the information 00 a store to
store basis is not disclosed. You can get a total figure on retilil
sales at a site, but Dot by the inö.å.vidual stores.
Hayor Sparks referred to a statement made at the June l4 _Unl
regarding the mix of stores that make up a regional shoppins
c:encer. Ms. Peterson said there was a series of studies being done
on a survey of 28 major shoPPinl centers to determine key indicators
of traffic generation. A disc:ussion was held on relationship of
~uare fo('tale and traffic illlpact. Çqunc. Jackson suggested the
~t~. at the top· of þa&e 217 .bÓuld moreacèüratelÿ·read'"rrip
rel.tèd impacts iDclud1llS air sad DOise impacts would 'rIOt:nec....rlly
tie less in proportion witb further reduction in floor area. !fa.
hteraon alread. Hr. I!eaU noted a survey of 56 regional scud1.
bad proved there vaa DO re1stiou between trip generation & floor
ar...
--
;f' ~uS '. .t.'17.
\,
;'i
, ~'.
. .
,1f"CM çdJIC1L pá..4IØì~
c:c-m
.... IS '
:-i-
'tr
:,:,~~"""'
't:~'''' ~;:1,: "j' ,
, - i~ t.
. . );:·,a. ~
.
, '
.'
~,.
:.:. ,., "!,,~
"
.'","
'/.~.:.; :,'
.;
"
'/", ~,'" ,', ,':"",'(\' ~",'r;"
Senic'",~~.tã~~~,. ~'~íof.' '
,. ". . ' tu, 40... JIiOtí':r....t &' sad.
'<..~:JD'rtIiê~1;tf'.a:lò~ . >1~.Úric:..b8joœtbat .._'11 by
1ãl~?;~~..¡.."ê:õ.Jì'¡¡.~Bel118 asked if. tb1s pl..... -f a
~adiàl1.:lë~ëdè..'.... ~e~U8OD said their intent vas to abov
tIda:1a-.:zíðt.:~opeI!iIIa up'vtrah.1and; 1a:,td~'.bout Y14eD1Da
&lid lIOIÜfication.
On page 178, Counc. ]feJ.1t.s _ted the project 1Dc:OIIIe for the center
vas $80 a square foot, which vas over and above the average of $63
per ltluare foot. She pointed out there had been a decline in
_e centers, and this 18 vith inflation. She questioned the
premise of 5% real arowtb.
C'Ounc. Jacks'On asked if prem1se was based on fact that there would
be n'O future competition put in trade area. !fs. Peterson said
tbere are n'O indications they vill be a competitor to a r~gional
shopping center 'Of this size.
Counc. Jackson said this referred t~ his questi'On 25. The assump-
tion vas made that there ,..'Ould be no drain off of existing c:)1:lpeti-
tors and DO new rp.lional centers. Tables 37-38 show 72.6% of
fl'Oor space 'Of Cupertino Crossroads i~ DSTM type of merchandise. He
&avo other examples. Vallco Village has 43% of floor space devoted
t'O DST!Î. Ms. Petersor said the real gro1Jth in total trade sales,
i!xcluding DS1H. 'WOnld be adequate to meet "need. of. existing viable
fl'OaT areas. Hs. Peterson said the types of merchanclise and price
selections offerëd in c.-unity shopping centers and the types of
_rchandlse and price seleCtions offered in regional shopping centers
are basically dbttDc:tive consumer . appeals. Regionals compete most
cornctly vith regional..
Counc. Nellis said sbe 'WOUld like a comment back to C'Ouncil on
why tberewill be . 5% arowth when there hasn't been on other
centers in .sp.1te,of ~lat:ion.
Ccnmc:. Nellis aated about the $79,000 "8tilllated for yearly expendi-
ture by the City for police. Hr. QulnJ.an said tbis vas based on
interviews conducted by the ataff duri1lg the General Plan EIR
witb repruentativ.. fr_ the sheriff'. office.
.-
HDlIITIS l)f TBI J1Im 17. 1174 crrr cœRCIL hutDIG,
.
,
",
'ti\;:· !IIa~A .;200. Côaac....UI4iJ. quntioae4 the l..t. puaarçb which st" .
,~;,: . .~~"~,J OC~.~f1c:at11.affect..~,~..·. tlutpte isiD .
,·'fi"j.,o ,",_,~_.;.tôw«...Jt",,:....çou14 not~...1iøt.' cillata~ wuld DOt affèc&
··.~."r,i ;~¡,.;:tft:t:·.tiÎâ:êM'ii'~"'to;Pap~198·:~·11IIItof' 1Iaopfta.~
~~",r*",.'.,i. '......., . ,'",^~"" " ,_'i¡'::.,.'. '
L~:~f,,;,;ê'''''.'' ",,' " "'.~,'".>:,.,' , ' :.-' It,.~·;~.,;;·, '
Tfi ;; .¡~:..,~,~... .~;~..... s1Í~~,~âto'þiJd...:.i; &tribuUca of
. iiïoPPiDI td"'; ·151 öf· tìi, "r.t1Ou'~u1d>·CÓIÍit' froa the V..tpte
ana. 118. htenOl! Mié1;ibe VoulcI Ukè'éò....r tbat 1aur in o_r
to 1upect"'i:t.fic·~n.
CouDc. .1118 questt.oaecl Datfic:ations of -1'1)' shorta ¡e. ..kinA if
_re energy would be needed at closed C:ype ùl1,:·..Hr';'~Gene,G.1'D8tt. JIII1M.
said the draft BIll is a reault of hi¡hly inteaaive effort of several
people. 'l'here are oaissions and errors in report. Process is to
clarify certain points. They have responded to so.e 30 letters
although only 13 c:aae in bafore legal deadline.
Hr. Carnett said the estimated water demand for the project is
250,000 gallons per day. The l2" water tube system has adequate
capacity. Estimated sanitary sewage flow is 200.000 gallons per
day. The estimated electrical consumption is 4 to 6 thousand ltVA.
PG&E states there is no problem in providing that amount of energy
to the project. If necessary, this could be reinforced wi th under-
ground cable. lie offered to submit calculations that went into
these figarea.
l
Counc. Nellis questioned whether the center could fœction without
air conditioning. Mr. Ralph Butterfield, arc:hitect for Vallco
said they could not compete successfull¡ without air conditioninl·
Air conditioning has to exist in the individual stores themselves.
Count.:. Nellis said her question was what is energy required for
closed mall as compared to open mall. Mr. Butterfield said he
would like to answer that at a later date. Counc. Frolic:h asked
for a "ballpark" opinion. } r. Butterfial¿ said the bulk of heat
came from lights of the store itself. It would not appreciably
increase load to have enclosed mall.
With reference to page l25, Counc. Nellis asked why there was so
little on leology impacts. Mr. Pantuso said for geology per se
under this center there are no impacts whatever. There had been
SOlIe questions raised on water run off and these were answered in'
the addendum. There are previous geolo¡y investigations in area
fro. whic:h they have extracted information. There vill be no
leological i.pacts on the structure.
~.
-
0;
,
e
IuJIUTaS OF THE J1IIJS 17. 1974 CITY œœCIL MEETING
CC-215
ra.. 17
"
;~
, ~.', ~;~~:" 17p. I.,~,~ , ~};600 II8V job. voulel be afkftecl.
'''':''''^'' ". ..~",. ,.f".,' ",,,,,, " .M4,. as, far as presSIIØ ~ ' '
. .1i~8Þt ~o~, , '.. ,:~;..~!!t.cfe,I1-~I' Ks. retea.. esp1a1necl
ridOdâ1eof'l·· .. '1Q;1.., Shërefeñecl to other .t". aascI.
Of the 1~600n" ,;~SO%'_ul'cUecleriCal and sal. .. -
uøtapt!èd ilourc~~ " ,tea.tm"óf profese1onal/lIIIDapr lnel
,'would involve ac'. . "1eve11n ~ation. '1bey c11cJ ÐOt'8Dtlc1pate
., "I,,· """,..~,' ,,', " ,"
any ,sip1f1c:antn~.ø aøv1n8 into area.
~
;~
Counc. Nellis th8Ì1 asked if the c:1ties of Santa Clara and Sœuyvale
and County of Santa Clara had beèn advised of center and asked to
c~t on it. The Plannin8 Director said he bad a list of those
to whom the report was sent and there had been no co_ts received
from I1l1Y of tbe..
Counc. 'rolir.h sugaested in interest of trying to speed up procedure,'
he assumed aaything that clarified report and answered questions '
raised would be included in final EIR and become a part of it. I
His one question was on traffic. Be was puzzled about the change
made in Wolfe Road ramp from freeway; no right turn. He did not
understand proposal and implications of this. Mr. Heald said the i
Division of Highways is proposing southboW1d traffic off 2eo,now 1
two lanes, will be widened to 4-6 lanes becoming storage lanes for I,
signals onto Wolfe Road. either left turn or right tu>n. The
complete intersection would be reconstructed. He said he had not i
seen design. The Director of Public Works suggested a diagram be
presented at next meeting. He said the intersection was being ¡
lI'Od1fied to four approaching lanes, two left and two right, and !
extending back for stacking purposes. Mr. Heald said this particular
problem is in exclusive domain of Division of Highways. Comc. i
Frolich said he would want to exert whatever influence the City may:
have in getting a satisfactory solution. The Director of Public ¡
Works said it was a mutual agreement between the State, the consult-'
ants and the City that the design eliminati:1g right turn lane was I
best solution to weaving problem.
At 10:55 p.m. a break was declared, with the 1III"eting reconvening
at ll:lO p.m.
Counc:. Jackson said he "mùd like to go through the traffic related I
I
..tters, starting with the letter from the State Department of "
Transportation. The second paragrapb spoke of studying matter of I
overpass at Tantau. The assumption all along bas been that it,
would be done. Hr. Heald said it is still a foregone conclusion
that it would be done, it is just a question of timing. CoUllC.
Jackson said at any event their decision has been based upon the
assu.ption tbat the overcrossing will bave to be required.
",~--,
¡,'
~U1A 0' m I. 17. 1t74 CIn OOUIIClL "tIuif'"
:1;~:~
.
'.
Cowc. .Jackson said v1ÜI nprd to exiting situation at off ra.¡t. be
would very auc:h want to ... detailed intersection _alyat.a .18ilar
to De Leuv, Cather anà1yat.a for Vallco. Hr. Heald said he doubted
if the Division of Hi""'" Plaøning had gotten to the point were
they had done the det.."'.... analysis COWlC. Jackson would like to see.
Be hesitated to do this _ the consultant. In answer to Coœc.
Jackson. ~. Viskovic:h said this could be done and Mr. Heald said
he would prepare a pac:kage of whatever analysis has been done.
Caunc:. Jackson noted the State is estimating traffic on 1-280 as
l20,OOO i:1 1978 and the CODSultants shew a figure of l02,OOO. Mr.
Heald said he felt the Scate was being optimistic. Mr. Heald said
the shc??ing center would probably ha..... less impact on peak hour
traffic than any other development would. He pointed out alternates
to freevay use. 1-280 traffic would be split between Wolfe Road and
Stevens Creek.
Counc. Jackson asked hOU' be could com;>are the DeLeuv, Cather report
done f"r Vallco, the Stace's analysis and the consultant's. Hr.
Heald said it was kind of a freeway gam.a they were playing. DeLe...
Cather as Vallco represeDtative had worked with Cal. in terms of a
General Plan EIR. The c:oasultants' mandate was to accept that work
as a l":1g term analysis. Their charge .-as to look at short term
and ide:1tify critical projects relative to short term. They did'
virtually no new work 00 long term program. Counc. Jac:ltson said
he hoped they were getc1n1 an analysis that takes into consideration
what specific facts vent into General Plan assumption, bOIl these
were assigned to the streecs and intersections, and capacities
inc:luded in there. Be said at some point in time he would like to
have a frame work that says "this is what we all agreed on" so wheh
. certain level of clevelop1llellt is reac:hoi!d, it can be referred to.
Counc. Jackson then referred to statement that there would be . _re
substantial effect OG peak hour traffic on freeway if my ..e other
than a shopping center _re developed. Mr. Heald said the traffic
generation would be the s_, but the distribution is differast.
.
.
.
.
.
lIDIun;:¡ OF tHE JtIII 17. B74,aT!' COUNCIL KEETDlC
CC-21S
Pa. 19
'¡i";'!f~e.-_ nfl';
'~_'::·=:eV:-p·'
~_'~_r to COUDC. Ji..,
';".. ," .\ix a;aà1 shllies clone ",
"·4.....£" .,~';'.. '~':.
t>!i~.;:~~..&n.:e. Jacbon ft'ferr"of left hand turns. 111:.
"<~:"f,;:r~'" ØQld ball said 901 vouiã,? .~'~~ turDS. lie questioned 111:.
4" .'" ..ld'a stataent thåt't' ;COI1trol would prohibit left taDIII.
':", J 1ÍIe Dinctor of Ptblic:' ','" t' d 'there would be left turns f~
Volfe load to Vallco Pa.i..4j~';a1though he did not know the latest
change or nCOlllllEüdatiCID.Jfr. Ba118 Korve of DeLe"", Cather said
lie thou¡ 1t they were gettiø&~ south and north bound left turns
msed. Be said the IIOSt dt.reet route would be to 10 throulJl the
loop to ~: to center paüiDg lot; this is the way the shopping
center wccl¿ be signed. Be ezplatned further the proposed traffic
routing.
Counc. Ja~s~n said he conld see no specific CO counts on adjacent
streets. ::~ asked what vculd be the difficulty in analysing the
effect ~:! ,:'esent homes oc !'.iller Road south o>f Stevens Creek
Boule\'ð:<¿, '"ICe Road no~" of Horoestead a::d ?runerldge east of
Val:co. ,,¿ said at no poi"t does EJR point out CO count. There
should :-~ ¡;:=e type of sr<'~ific counts gh'~~ for homes adja<:ent
to thí'se ¡;::<~ets and shO'JIl how much effect t:.is or future
develop=":::5 "ill have on this count.
Counc. .'a::.t5""- questionéd air quality in r3";<Ì:1~ under the b:rlld-
ing. ~!:<, :a:1tuso said the buildings wer.. !"l~~' ventilated. There
were s~ ?:'Oblems with tmderlround parking. There are several
_thods ¡;,;¿¿ to control air quality. Wheth~r cr not this is a
hazard h5.5 ""t been decided.
Counc. Ja~~on referred to statement in H8"lett-Packard EJR which
showed 5~>=~ficant dba COa:1t5 CQ Homestead R.:aJ. He asked ..-here
counts !:a;i ""en taken on ezistt.nl heavy trafÎic roads. Mr. Pantus
said one "as taken on H111er and one on H~s!ead.
A discussicc was held on the four page respo>nse done jointly
between De:'euw Cat:her and.JJ!JC. The Direct"~ of Public Works
pointed <,ut that when you are looking at 19ì8 line and 1995
you are INdng at differeat assumptions ",,¿er different CO:lC!ition].
You cann~t "ompare the tvo. Mr. Viskovich said DeLeuw Cather
could st..,l~· the exact _1 assignments produced for this stage
and per"e:>tage distributed to different routes. Counc. Jackson
said t!1is was whst he wonld Uke.
.
.
.
CC-215
, p.. 20
JI1JIIJ!ES or THE .J1IŒ 17, 1974 CITY œUNCIL HEETIIG
:
,an.c. Keyen said .ost.of·Jda queatlons haft been raised aDd __"IÑ.
:".OIMI, ,ilü!!~t,QQ ~,' ,QQ,' "~!'~~!'~~~"',' ",=fomta atødards sho~d" ~" ,I: b.
'.._' ", ",,'~.r.. tIaet&~.~-, ,!'AU ,ø1a. to ,teU"o.'to.topf~
.';. :. ':~¡.:;~~:1~~~~"', ~ ':0~f!~aa::'~"I/~:;: ~~~
. .t8llÌlãl:ll1D ----7"" ',1ò;;'.'"C" ' " "
-..,':f~~':--' :, . ",-',AF'S("?~~~·t;~~~J}3;' , , '
"_,' ".'altervU1l.~era1:,'1t~E,..o"f{;.",r:l,~llC:O' noted the lise ,emit ...
-teton Ph_il\l "--is1~~~,.....:, o~~~t:he thinp be1nl considered tODf.gbt
aader BIR hne already beeaiajrilied ~to, There vill be no trucldn8 froa
Sean on vest siele to BÚllÔêiS~ W'loadinl staps haw been r81lOved
further frOll the residentiû: area, Penney's haa agreed not to sen
aasoline per Plmning Co..u.ion request and have moved tba to east
of facilities next to 'our Phase. He spoke on tunnel instead of
bridp, proposed bike routes and bike lanes and are considerinl
putting whatever height vall is required around subdivision. They have
had l2 major plans to date and in realistic terms must come to a point
were they say this is the plan.
,,;.
~, ,
Hr. Ward commented on reductions already agreed to, and that they
are maintaining all landscapinl on Wolfe Road. He said when use
permit and changes have been considered, it will be seen they have
listened to the public and have done everything to mitigate problems
from center.
Mr. Vic Duana, Bullocks, referred to Table 36 on page 110. He said
three depdrt~nt stores are not called super regionalg. Super regionals
are 4, 5 and even 6 stores. They tend to ke~p super marketg out of
regional type centers and into cOQmunity and service type centers.
He noted they do not plan a super regional in Vallco.
With reference to page lBO, Table 54, Mr. Duano noted these centers
arp- older in quality, design, etc. and need up dating.
Hr. Duano noted the market Bnalysis was based on three department
store center.
In an~wer to Counc. Nellis, Hr. Duano stated Bullock's has not said
they would not come without Penney's. The store across the street
could be any store. Entire presentation to officers and Board of
Directors is based on three stores. They would have to reassess
decision on two store baais.
Counc. Meyer said one fact that complicates reduction is that Sear's
is already in existence. Other stores are reduced inproportionately.
Hr. Duana said Bullock's needs l70,OOO sq. ft. on three floors to do
the job for the people in this area. It was pointed out this center
would not ~ave three story store.
Hayor Sparks asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak
at this time.
.,;,
"'f'
~,. "
fk"~:
~"'
f.i;',·{:""
-"
'i "'1',
~r:tj\" ,
,>
I
I
MINUTES 0' THE JURE 17. 1974 cm COONCIL KEETIlfG
CouDc. 1Iel11s salel she woulel like SlIM feel1n& fro. the CouDc11
..co1ibat clf.rec:tioai-hcÎii1e1 be given to c_ultaDU. hwa1cl
"~ a.clina Øiì~~'.Iiì!iìfa1r poUuU_ 1D ana aD4 bn'ilÎÞt
bac:k-Julyl. 'IÌa.,DJ.~to'.C'of Public VatU said a ....ft1àaa11l1Þ
',t{¡.' ~I prepare41it;'J'BiàDd they should havelOMt1da'1 Sa' ahat
. tWó !'INIÜs. - ',..."
, " '
Ways of doc:1lMl1t1nll101øe levela at ~ak houn OQ certa1D Itreets
vere clf.sc:uased. eoUl1è. Heyen noted noise levels an pnttJ w11
clefined. Be felt coÎll1tinl of <XI and pollutant levels to be of
_re signifigance. Counc. Jac:ksan said they neeœd adclf.t1oaal
information on ex1st1ul levels of noise on streets adjacent to
site as well as projections for the future.
After further clf.sc:uasion, Comc. Jackson said he did not consider
EIR adequate in these areas. They should have been studied and
facts presented.
Counc. ~ellis said primary concerns are noise and air. The EIR
is not adequate to make decisions in these arcas. She would like
additional readings at different ti~es of day, different days of
week and include the three streets mentioned by Counc. Jackson:
Prune ridge, }!iller south of Stevens Creek, and Wol fe Road. T"sts
should be taken of air quality in residential area as it is now.
After discussion, it was decided the C('uncil felt the studies
shou Id be doae.
Counc, Jac'son suggested one area to be studied and that was the
homes closest to the off ramp at 1-280, the existing levels and
effects of start and stop traffic. lñe area of Drake Drive,
1-280 abuting Vall co Park, Lark Avellue, East Estates and residen-
tial area surrounded by Vallco and Pr,n1eridge were discussed.
;
I
,
I
signalization on traffic in that configuration. Also more back- :
.
ground bet~cen State count and City count on freeway and off ramp.:
He would like the kind of information which gives how much .
traffic was assigned to each intersection and what is proposed.
They must know traffic assumptions.
Counc. Jackson said he would like an analysis of effect of new
It was moved by Counc. Meyers, seconded by Counc. Frolich, to
continue Application l-EIR-74 (Westfield Company) and Application
3-EIR-73 (Vallco Park Regional Shopping Center) to the meeting of
July 1, 1974.
Motion carried, 5-0
CC-21S
Pap 21
l-EIR-74
3-EIR-73
continued
to 7/ 1/74
i CC-Z15
l. .... 22
'.
~
I
4-V-74
approved
Res. 3678
adopted
lIDuu.$ or m4lt.. 17. 1974 CItt OO\1IC1L mr!
Ie _ qnM to IwW . t. ~ 1:' baartDa OD V.......,. 111\11. J_ 19.
1174 u 7:30 ,.a. t. ) J~1:Ida left _t1.. at dWI paÞC.
. ,··Itfl.:,;;,t~'· '! ,. .
j.~'.....-
~WIoAU_ .;¡i' : 't' .
;.. :;,-.'\. ~"" ' '
, "':~,~~' ':'i, ~, 1.
:f'iò P1 111\1 ' .."
;,;. . 't'" . 1, t',,~
(a) , '¡"""74 of .. - 'tOfUt1- (WSache11a DoData):
n tin the nqu1nð ...r of off..tnet paddnl
apacee ' 'die 1IcC1e111D Squan Shopphl Center. Said
propeft7 .. ...... at the northwat comer of Hc:ClellaD
Road ... --lfp--SuDDyYale Road, c:onatau of 6.9 acn.
_d is wSllata . CC (General C_rc:ial)ZoM. Rec~ded
for app~.
The Pbnning Director ftf.nwd to staff report of May 24, 1974 which
descr.~é!d applicat10a 1a <letaU. The US~ pemit resolution and
acco..p",,:b~ exhibit. _r. attached i"-1s1IIuc:h as the 1.15. perait cannot
be cpèu:i\'é! until the _dance is appNwd by this body.
Move:! ,,~ ~,·unc:.s..llis, .ecOfIded by CC·In~. Meyers, to approve appllcation
4-V- -..
~',·tion .:arried, 4-0
(1) R<?solutlcn )10. 3678: ".\ Resoluticn of the City
C"""cil of tho! City" i Cupo!rtino Gra:1ting a
\"ariance to Se'oman ?r0pert1es (:{inchells Donuts)
to red'.1ce the Requt~~J :;umber of Off-str~et
Parking Spaces wi thin tho! :¡rClellan Square
Sh::¡pplng Co!nter. S.tlJ property contains 6.9
acres and is with1n a CG (G<!neral Commerclal)
Zone located at the ::,'rthwest comer of ~lcClellan
Road and Saratoga-S,.nnyvale Road."
~Ioved '~:: (ounc. Jackson. seconded by CO'lnC. Nellis, to adopt
Resol~:i~n So. 3678.
~Iotion carried, 4~
~) Application 5-V-74 of Vall co Park, Ltd.; Variance to
cons truc:t 9-foot high modular prec:ast securi ty wall at
northerly terminus of ~eaJc'" Avenue on Vallco Park
proper~y. Said property is in a P (Planned Development
with light industrial int~nt) zone and is located at the
southerly property line of lntersil, Inc., 10900 North
Tantau Avenue. Recounœnded for approval.
"
:,">..?,'
,;;!q;;i'~:
,
.
.
e
,:,i~~h;~, .
'<~~L? , huluus OF J1I Π17, 1974 cnT OJIJRCIL HEErINGS
,,-,,'"
"fi."f', "~,~~ ;,'"
;'J~P':¡:~;~t. l -'.
, 'j~)."'(
,~~-.. .-I by CoUDC.':,..,.Ø. ..èODded by Counc.
,I'\'~~~ZOW Appl1c:at1OD S-V-74.
. ' ,
." ~ ~~
;,~ f ,;0' ~ ;,.
. .ir :i~,~:~
" ~-i;'I.~
. "~
- '"
..fl... '
·:,/:4~:,,?,'·t,.t.'
to
'.
Hatton card_. ,'4-0
(1)
Besoluciaa ..3679: "A Besolutlar-of ,the City
eounc11 of tIIe.City of Cupertino Gt:øtiDl a
Variance to vaUco Park, Ltd. to c:oìuatruc:t 9-foot
high Kodu1ar Precast Security Wall at Rortherly
Tel'lllinus of lfeadow Avenue on Vallco Parlt property
Said Property is in a P (Planned neftlop1ænt vith
Light Industrial Intent) Zone and is located at
the Southerly property lines of Intenil. Inc..
l0900 North Tantau Avenue."
Moved by CoO:;!c. Meyers, seconded by Cou.'1':. Nellis, to adopt
Resoluti,~ ~;~. 3679.
Motion carried, 4-0
11. .;~~::it"ctural and Site Approval C,,=itt<,e
\~ Application HC-51,075.361 "f 1 ,S,S. (Bern O'Cr~:1Cr)
requesting approval of a sip I']an for 1:\;0 li¡;ht
industrial b,,:l¿ings l"cat,,;: "t 10!,35 and 10:;:)1 ~ortè, '
Tantau Avenœ =1 19050 rr.=:,-rid¡;<' Ave:\ue. Reco",m":\,"~
f,'r approval.
Moved t-y ~~"=...:. Jackson, see-ended by C0u:-'.~. :lcyers, to appTùve
appli,a:::~ ~C-51,075.361,per the H-C0ntr01 r<,comm<,ndation.
""tion carried, 4-0
(~, Application HC-51,027.14 of Ja~es W. Foug and Assoc-
iates (Security Pacific Natio:\jl Bank) requesting
approval of ligbting and sib:,;,ng for a bank facility
located at the natheast c,'tnt'r of Pacifica Drive and
Saratoga-SUIIDyvale Road. ¡¡.,.:o::œtended for approval.
Moved by C~u=c. Nellis, secoaded by Counc. Nellis, to .~rove
appllcat::~ HC-51,027.l4, per the H-Contro1 rocommcodatloa.
Kotion carried, 4-0
(d Application HC-5l,027.l41 o~ James W. 'oug and
Associstes (Security Pacific N4tiona1 Bank) request-
ing exception to the Sign Ordinance to allow a
-
CC-215.
Page 23
S-V-74,
approftd
Res, 36 79
adopted
IIC-51,075.
361
a¡)pr"...ed
HC-51,027.
app roved
If:"
.,~.,~'
'~:'-:2:'~,:':~1':
.
-
IUJIUUò> OF TIlE .J1 ß 17. U74 ern ~ JEErDG
Mdit1aD Co cwo n11.l:j"" to
.1. aD a lot v1t:1t~1f ~ Þro
) ft. of .1t....I'..fji!Iìi~1oc&t..
comu of rac1fl"~""
1e.....~ ____. jlÔ"'i':fÒrdaial. ,',.
, < dty Pac:1ft.c Ratt.aIÍâ1,{Id.
~,;~,.,~", ,,:0:" ""~ ~:J~.f,:~~',,~ " ,~:': :;,
¡i':1fr' ~...... Cl.4di..~.',.... .~, aftI:' Iadt. pw badL.-1III4 of how they
'....loped tbe1r,a{jà:,~"f1re said they bad caJ;afa111 nvi_d
the atp. ordillaDC.;1W cEAd\ to adcJres. w-elwe to Dew autdelin..
011 uisting ordilL&llC8 aDIi ldeDtific:atica needs at _ .ite. He said
the prtsary ident1ficat1oD .Ips are perpendicular to vehicular
traffic an Saratoaa-S...., ".1.e lIDad.
¡;
Hr. Clañ shoved slides of their sip cd other busin..... dose to
them "i>" have been anaved a free sundinl sign. If they are not
allClled the sip on Saratoga-Sunnyvale lIDad they w11l have to change
whole C-'C1cept of signing. They have considered alternatives and it
will be c!ifficult to put sian on building because of architecture of
buildin~. He noted they have 150 linear feet instead of 120 shown
by sta:: ..ad vith additional 25' ",hich they ",ill be required to
landsca?" and curb cut, rill have the necessary 2l0'.
~:
~'...'
In anS>."'''' to !layor Sparks. the Director of Planning and Development
said t::"~,, Ùree parcels are zoned more for offices than f<.r ce-.ter.
In ans""'" to Counc. Jac:ltson regarding recommendation that there be
no free 5~a.."ding dans in this quadrant, ~r. Sisk explained this was
a conGi:i~n ~f zoning of the conceptual plan.
Counc. ~"Y"rs asked about directional signs and ascertained they were
appro'~ 3t ¡>rior meeting. This is a variance for free standing sign
only.
Ha. !\a:..:! Salim, lOl4l B11ich Place, Cupertino, Chainaan of the
Archiao:;¡ral and Site Approval Co=lt:ee, verified rationale of
not pern:.::ing ground sign, referring to Planning Comaission condition
of zo:1i:~ a:>J less than 210 linear feet.
ØC-5l,027.
141 roe!.........
badr. to __
eont rot
After b~!t"r discussion, ,Counc. Meyers moved to refer application
ØC-51.0~~.1¡1 back to ø-GoDtrol for modification of plans. Seconded
by Co'.:-:. Jackson.
Motion carried, 4-0
t'..
-t"".
j~, '
.
.
.
_.... fW till J1JI& 17. U74 C1Tf c:aDlCIL JlU:I1JIG
, ~~
1.,='" ~ ,í
,¡~~,,)(f'\';".
"Ìí:" ,~,<::,"". ,
f. cs~' '~.--' '>~.':"'7:
,~c . '~.
c'!;':
(I)
~:, ;
"';.,1.»1.3 of Jføda J.. Wl.QII.r
. ", ) '-'¡JI"rtiq "'Fa ..·"01....
~aptq .... .'''. ,for.
'located at die ..... ~of":'
_. 140 ft. _& of "-,,,.í..I- .
~.fec "~.v..å1.
~
i1>~ J~"
,
..~ .., eø.ac~ ~~ _1-'''' .., c:ë-C. J
..,ucaUœ 1C-5l.331.3. "1' Il-CaDttol nc
---.... CO -Haw"
Iltt.œ.
JlDttco canted. 4-0
.. 1:JS11ŒSS
12. A nqœst by Joseph c-rda for a teaporary fruit stand for
a period not exc:eedinl thirty (30) days located at the
northvest corner of Viau and Stevens Creek Boulevard
(GeDeral eo-rc1al Zone) beginninl July 1, 1974, 10' x 10'
in size.
Moved by Counc. Meyers. secODded by Counc. Jackson, to ¡rant
authorization to Mr. Joseph Camarda for a temporary fruit stand
.. per request.
Motion carried, 4"()
13. City Council authorizinl the Mayor to aian alreeaent vith
Sage ..search Corporation concerning preparation of
!nviromaental Iapact Report for Fooclaaker, Inc., (Jack in
the Box) project.
COunc. Jadtson ascertained there vould be no conflict of interest.
Mr. Sbk said seven fi~ had bid. This particular concern had
expertise for analysis food bœiness. Counc. Nellis noted of the
three firms, thb vas lowest bid and there vas a substantial
difference in bida. 1he eo-c1l _mers expressed their concern
CD appraising fee sc:hMule. Mr. Quinlan said he shared their
c:onc:l'!m, but did not Imow bCIV to answer it. The Director of
AdIIinistrative Services said there vas a standard form of
zesolution authorizin& such silDAtures.
Counc. Jackson, seconded by Counc. Meyen, aoved to authorize
...olution No. 3681.
Motion carried, 4"()
CC-215
.... 25
t.
,>,
.
8C-51. 331. 3
...._...J)4
Tellporary
fruit stand
"s. 368l
authorized
e
e
CC-215
, ..... .
~- ,t
,..; to
;'
!lUU&i$ 01' till J1JII17. 1!74 em COORCIL _øc
: :, 14. r..__ea~ "~_~1J75 Operat1q _1: . l' "t .......t..
...~. of I~~~.V-o;~'~'. . .
''!'"'''' ' ",.: ?:·:t-:":;.,:.Æ<;J':<" .' ."" , ,"':,'
Mrs.-..rK""i.;'~Þ'1 OR tile. . . ,. ..;~~ÍIÍa·
'" ".t .~_.' . ;"~,.. ":1_ 7ï3lt:j'r "19.' Ø14
iD tÌIa'~--' .. . ,'c:1tJ 1a11..":~~;t"~;::J:"1 '
; , ,7 't.'¡~t~' ",' ,,',;{, j,f,f; ':t'f' .'
15......t f_ .;'~!;':Îd1Do Ua1CID sd;~~-'~~"'.' ~dq
pañ b.~-4"~24 throq:h July 26,:;;~7~¡~,"',UM tD901wc1
w111 be 45 .t,' ~ ',.r ûy for .n tIays.tlÜcIa)·eiþIåJ. 17's 1IouØ.
Hr. 11c:hard AncleØOD, r ! uC1Do Ua10n School Ð1stdc:e S r Scbo;øl
Dl.rector, had init1.~ die øqueat for an adtlitiOlll1 'croesinl pari.
Be c:a11ed the City Ball tIIú _minI. June 17, to iDfonå that tIae
sc:hool district would -,pnd1. this atter internally'" asked that
his previous requeat be vitbclnllD. It vas r~ved froa tIae .poda
per his requeat.
ORDnu.1(CES
16. first reading of Ordinance No. 640: "An Ordin_c:e of the City
of Cupertino -..dinS Section 1 of Ordinance Bo. 2 by Prezontnl
Approxilll8tely .20 acre frOlll Santa Clara County al-lO (ltesiclen-
tial, Single-Fa2ily 10,000 Sq. 't. Per Dwellin& Onit) Zone to
City of Cupertino n-7.5 (lteaidential, Sinale-F..tly, 7,500
Sq. Ft. Per DveUiøl Unit) Zone; Located Ilesterly of md
adjacent to !fira Vbta Avenue Approximately as feet Southerly
of the intersectiOll of Santa Paula Avenue and !fin Vist.
Avenue, l053S !fira Vista Avenue." (continued frosa _eting
of June 3, 1974)
1be Director of Planøina _d Development referred to staff report
dated JUDe l4. 1974.
Hr. Roy Cook. 14440 lie aasiD Way. Saratop. stated hb opposition to
OrdiDaftc:e 110. 640. Be stated title has not p...ed oø property nUlDbered
10525 !fira Vista AvclJi!. Be also que£tioned why both properties were
not required to be Clœsed .t s_ ti..., since the two properties are
contiguous. Hr. Cook s a.1d the City Engineer had said this vas required
111 the put. Hr. Cook referred to the April l. 1974 eo-c:il ainutes
indicating there vas _ ouestaødinl IIOrtgage on that tu... Be felt
this vas llisleadina since the mrtpge vas on both properties. Be
feels this is a preaature ..mini.trative action. Hr. Cook said the
v~."r _ter vas needed to ..11 ho.... He had 29 sipatuRS of adjoining
property owners who are opposed to this dovnlradinl of the area.
I
~
.
.
e
e
...un.:. 0' tI!E JUNE 17.lt74 C1T'l CCJJlICIL MEETING
~"', t-~. { ~,
~:!:'0-~'C::
I~¿::J:.>';<;· J ;,:'=:1 Director '," ";,, Ralli. a1Ioat'wU f"·;~'.i
"'i",l~;, 't(.~,.~:,',.~.""'. '. '~.. =~ .:: :-Z:~;.,'." , :~::ul:' c:~::,:~~
t1I'f":''¡þ:~' .~,., "., "", VI ,. . . !,~'" ...-:' ;
r£'....'.¡~1;. >'t~,.. ,'-.....t1œ paperil". .,,'f~~ vas ,defilÍ.. - ~ " .
tr;:' ''),', ;"""}jä',¡,''Dere vas no ,,'j k;t:be otÞer lot other that'-
,. t _r to sip both :Lou '~Ju ..., ....·....OD. .
;./~',;. ' ' "
Aftar further disc:uss1oø. Ca.' . -. ..1l1a IIOftd to Iurfe ()rdf- --
110.' 640 read by title oal7. ... the Cleñ '. readinl .hall coaaU-
tate the First Beadinl. S. ......d by Counc. Jac:kson.
Motion earnect. 4-0
It was no~ed tha~ L.A.P.Co bas ..ked the staff to 1nvesUpte
the possibility of anne:dlal t:he second lot vbich vas beiDI doDe.
IESOLUTI cr.-s
17. No. 3492: "A JIesoløncm of ~he City Council of the CitY
of Cupertino. State of California, Adopting Hazardous
Fire Area Haps."
Resolution ~o. 3492 vas ~~.ed from the agenda at the staff'.
request and vas continue4 to the meeting of July 1.
18. No. 3656.4: "A a-olution of the City Council of the City
of Cupertino Authodz1.Dg the Execution of an Agree:zent
allOng the Ci~y. the 'oothill Community College Distr1c~.
_d Brian, Kanps, Foulk and Associates, Engineer of Work -
De ADza CampUS Off-SCree~ Parking and Traffic Fac:il1Ües
Assessmen~ District.-
Counc. Jaw"" questioned ~herthere was opposition frea De
Mayor Sparks noted the CJT.IOS~ has diminished.
Counc. Meyers moved, se~d by Counc. Jac:ksotl, ~o ad..>pt.
1e80lution ~o. 3656.4.
Motion carried. 4-0
UPORTS FRet! om CEBS
19. City Staff - Nolle
CC-21S
Pap 27
Ord. 640
first
Þad1DI
Rea. 3492
continued
Bes. 3656.,
adopted
PultUc JIeMr-,
~ ins _ Solid'
Vue.
, Røit1eat
.
Car. .....
MJ--
~
.
,.J'"
,..-;...,_......~-,.~.
-
.
"nnm::s OF 'IHI J1II! U. 1f1. CITY (DWCIL IŒETIII:
j%~h'" .
"iiœ I!,w.toa
~~~<":~~,~;'\: -
, ~'f! -ìoia
"",
"~~l:,'
'.' ~èl1
'Ç."fJ"",':"^'
!:·,U::í" ,''', " '
~lü_t1gate . eo.pWat of!ttur ..1øIIlol
, ,''',' F'quare Shoppins caUr oato properi;".:a
.' ",' "',_C ,,</-' ':'"
1D tile Feltoo Saltðl: ' -;} . ,
t .'"
1M staff also _,~j~ to instigate surveilløce of speedial
alCln& K..--c1ellaD .... ,. ':';'. .
....
1ECX~lYlClII or,
20.
GtlÎeø11
" "~'iIt'
.,':t.':;!'!::..., '.¡'i>¡' ,
"',:, , , .,:' ..>'"J'"
....ø~ô.f;
,
'~ . .
u.
CoUllC. Meyers ref~ to request by \Civanis C10Jb of Cupertino to hold
a 'lea M:nltet aDd .",ru aø4 Crafts :.11011. He vas fn favor of flea market
but wuld not be in :-__r of hav~g camival ri~...
After a brief disc1&IIlca, Counc. Jackson moved to grant authorization
to the' Kiwanis Club of Ca¡>ertino to hold a Fle.. Market and. Arts and
Crafts Show on Satar4aT. September 7, 1974 in the C~?8rti~o Town
Center. this authorizuion specifically excludes any per.rlssion
for circus ridcs or ~val attractions of a siailar nature.
Seconded by Counc. Keyeca.
Motion ,arried, 4-0
Coune. ~~)"ers reporced there vould be a Public Hearing o:t,Sol1d Waste
on 1ilU=Sda)', June 20 i:I t.'1e County Suilding, Board of Supervisors.
the C<-undl IIICmbers agreed to continue the hearing .on Resident
Card l'u¡;e to Ilednesday, .JUDe 19.
AnJOUR:i~
It V35 .....ved by Counc. );ellis, seconded by Counc. Meyers, to adjourn
to ...e:ing to Wednesday. JUDe 19, at 7:30 p.m. Tbe meecing W3S a':jo"¡'"eJ
at 1:':'5 a.m.
Motion carried~ 4·-0
APPR~:
Isl Reed Sparks
~yor, City of CupertiDo
ArrEST:
/s/ 1è. E. Ryder
C~.t)' Clerk
-~-,-", ._-,-----