The URL can be used to link to this page

11-19-19 Searchable packetCITY OF CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 10350 Torre Avenue, Council Chamber Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:30 PM Televised Special Meeting Study Session (5:30) and Regular Meeting (6:45) NOTICE AND CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Cupertino City Council is hereby called for Tuesday, November 19, 2019, commencing at 5:30 p.m. in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014. Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business on the subject matters listed below under the heading, “Special Meeting." The regular meeting items will be heard at 6:45 p.m. in Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. SPECIAL MEETING ROLL CALL - 5:30 PM STUDY SESSION 1.Subject: Study session regarding policy options to reduce the use of natural gas and increase electrification of Cupertino’s building stock via local amendments to the 2019 California Energy & Green Building Standards Codes (Reach Codes). Recommended Action: Provide direction on policy options to reduce the use of natural gas and increase electrification of Cupertino’s building stock via local amendments to the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes. Staff Report A - CC Resolution No. 18-094 Declaring a Climate Emergency B - ReachCodesPresentation_10.16.19 C - ReachCodesWrittenCommunications_CC_SC D - Signed Letter of intent E - SustainabilityCommissionRecommendation_10.24.19 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 PM Page 1 11/19/19 1 of 237 City Council Agenda November 19, 2019 ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS AND PRESENTATIONS 1.Subject: Certificates of Appreciation to the Cupertino Citizen Corps for their assistance with the recent Public Safety Power Shutdown (PSPS) Recommended Action: Present Certificates of Appreciation to the Cupertino Citizen Corps for their assistance with the recent Public Safety Power Shutdown (PSPS) 2.Subject: Certificates of Appreciation to volunteers at the Silicon Valley Korean School (SVKS) Recommended Action: Present Certificates of Appreciation to volunteers at the Silicon Valley Korean School (SVKS) 3.Subject: Proclamation for Lung Cancer Awareness Month Recommended Action: Present proclamation for Lung Cancer Awareness Month 4.Subject: Presentation by Cupertino-Copertino, Italy Sister City Committee adult delegation regarding recent trip Recommended Action: Receive presentation by Cupertino-Copertino, Italy Sister City Committee adult delegation regarding recent trip 5.Subject: Presentation by Judy Miner, Chancellor of Foothill-De Anza Community College on the planning process for the facility that will replace De Anza's Flint Center Recommended Action: Receive Presentation by Judy Miner, Chancellor of Foothill-De Anza Community College on the planning process for the facility that will replace De Anza's Flint Center POSTPONEMENTS 6.Subject: Continue Item No. 15 Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments to a future meeting date and item will be renoticed. These topics will be discussed in the study session. Recommended Action: Continue Item No. 15 Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments to a future meeting date. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on any matter not on the agenda. The total time for Oral Communications will ordinarily be limited to one hour. Individual speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. As necessary, the Chair may further limit the time allowed to individual speakers, or reschedule remaining comments to the end of the meeting on a first come first heard basis, with priority given to students. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Council from Page 2 11/19/19 2 of 237 City Council Agenda November 19, 2019 discussing or making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. REPORTS BY COUNCIL AND STAFF (10 minutes) 7.Subject: Report on Committee assignments Recommended Action: Report on Committee assignments CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 8.Subject: Annual adoption of Other Post-Employment Benefits (“OPEB”) Trust Investment Policy. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-135 accepting the City Investment Policy for the OPEB Trust. Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - OPEB Trust Policy 9.Subject: Annual adoption of Pension Trust Investment Policy. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-136 accepting the City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust. Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Pension Investment Policy 10.Subject: Treasurer’s Investment Report for period ending September 30, 2019 Recommended Action: Accept staff report and provide recommendations. Staff Report A - Chandler Investment Report 09.30.2019 B - Wells Fargo Mkt Cost Report D - LAIF Statement 11.Subject: Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Senate Bill (SB) 2 Planning Grants Program Application Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 19-137 authorizing application for, and receipt of, SB 2 Planning Grants Program Funds Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - SB 2 Planning Grants Program Application Form 12.Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10425 S. De Anza Boulevard Page 3 11/19/19 3 of 237 City Council Agenda November 19, 2019 Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10425 S. De Anza Boulevard. Staff Report A - Application 13.Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market, Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10983 N. Wolfe Rd. Recommended Action: Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10983 N. Wolfe Road. Staff Report A - Application SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 14.Subject: Second reading of Municipal Code Amendments to the Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 5, adopting new policies regulating the sale of tobacco, such as requiring a local permit to sell tobacco products, prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco, prohibiting new businesses from selling tobacco near schools and reducing tobacco retailer density, prohibiting tobacco sales at pharmacies and in vending machines, and limiting storefront signage. Recommended Action: Conduct second reading and enact Ordinance No. 19-2190; "An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino adding chapter 5.50 to title 5 (Business Licenses and Regulations) to regulate the sale of tobacco products and repealing chapter 10.27 of the Municipal Code (Cigarette and/or Tobacco Vending Machines)" Staff Report A - Draft Ordinance to Regulate the Sale of Tobacco Products PUBLIC HEARINGS 15.Subject: Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments has been continued to a future meeting date and item will be renoticed. These topics will be discussed in the study session. Recommended Action: Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments has been continued to a future meeting date. ORDINANCES AND ACTION ITEMS 16.Subject: Update on Library Expansion Project, selection of Conceptual Design, approval of project delivery method, and direction on project funding. Page 4 11/19/19 4 of 237 City Council Agenda November 19, 2019 Recommended Action: 1. Conceptual Design: Select either the One-Story or the Two-Story Conceptual Design. Additional actions listed below as determined by Conceptual Design selection. 2. One-Story Conceptual Design a. Approve use of a traditional Design-Bid-Build project delivery method. b. Authorize the City Manager or her designee to negotiate and enter into all agreements as necessary with a qualified architectural firm and construction/project management firm for an amount not-to-exceed $808,200. 3. Two-Story Conceptual Design a. Authorize use of a Design-Build project delivery method, using best value selection, assuming Design-Build is determined to be feasible. b. Approve Resolution 19-138 executing a loan agreement of up to $3,000,000 from the General Fund to Capital Fund for the Library Room Expansion. c. Approve Budget Amendment 1920-070 increasing appropriation by $3,000,000 for the Library Expansion Project. d. Authorize the City Manager or her designee to negotiate and enter into all agreements as necessary with a qualified architectural firm and construction/project management firm for an amount not-to-exceed $1,870,500. 4. Staffing: Authorize transfer of a 3-year Limited Term Project Manager in the Department of Public Works from the new City Hall project to the Library Expansion Project. Staff Report A - Draft Resolution B - Program List C - One-Story Conceptual Design D - Two-Story Conceptual Design E - Preliminary Project Schedule 17.Subject: Approve the First Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2019-20 Recommended Action: 1. Accept the City Manager’s First Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2019-20 2. Adopt Resolution No. 19-139 approving First Quarter budget adjustments 3. Adopt Resolution No. 19-140 amending the Compensation Program for the Unrepresented (Management and Confidential) Employees Staff Report A - Draft Resolution Approving Budget Adjustments B - First Quarter Financial Report FY19-20 C - Detailed Description of Year End and Adjustments made through 9/30/19 D - First Quarter Budget Adjustments Journal E - Draft Resolution Amending the Unprepresented Employees' Compensation F - Unrepresented Comp - Clean G - Unrepresented Comp - Redlined Page 5 11/19/19 5 of 237 City Council Agenda November 19, 2019 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - CONTINUED (As necessary) COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Cupertino has adopted the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure §1094.6; litigation challenging a final decision of the City Council must be brought within 90 days after a decision is announced unless a shorter time is required by State or Federal law. Prior to seeking judicial review of any adjudicatory (quasi-judicial) decision, interested persons must file a petition for reconsideration within ten calendar days of the date the City Clerk mails notice of the City’s decision. Reconsideration petitions must comply with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code §2.08.096. Contact the City Clerk’s office for more information or go to http://www.cupertino.org/index.aspx?page=125 for a reconsideration petition form. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next City Council meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the Council meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, City Council meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Cupertino City Council after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Council packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the City Council concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Council on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Council, and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to Page 6 11/19/19 6 of 237 City Council Agenda November 19, 2019 the podium and the Mayor will recognize you. If you wish to address the City Council on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. Page 7 11/19/19 7 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject:Study session regarding policy options to reduce the use of natural gas and increase electrification of Cupertino’s building stock via local amendments to the 2019 California Energy & Green Building Standards Codes (Reach Codes). Provide direction on policy options to reduce the use of natural gas and increase electrification of Cupertino’s building stock via local amendments to the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes. File #:19-6276,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 8 of 237 RESOLUTION NO. 18-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DECLARING A CLIMATE EMERGENCY WHEREAS, in April 2016 world leaders from 175 countries recognized the threat of climate change and the urgent need to combat it by signing the Paris Agreement, agreeing to keep warming "well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels" and to "pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to l.5 °C"; WHEREAS, the death and destruction already wrought by global warming of approximately 1 °C demonstrate that the Earth is already too hot for safety as a ttes ted by increased and intensifying wildfires, floods, rising seas, diseases, droughts and extreme weather; WHEREAS, the United States of America has disproportionately contributed to the climate and ecological crises and has repeatedly obs tructed global efforts to transition toward a sustainable economy, and thus bears an extraordinary responsibility to rapidly solve these crises. (Gillis, Justin and Popovich, Nadja. "The U.S. Is the Biggest Carbon Polluter in History. It just Walked Away from the Paris Climate Deal" Neiu York Tim es , 1 June 2017. ) WHEREAS, justice requires that frontline communities, which have historically borne the brunt of the extractive fossil-fuel economy, participate actively in the planning and implementation of this mobilization effort at all l evels of government and that they benefit first from the transi ti on to a renewable energy economy; WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino strives to be a leader in combatting climate change, and together with our regional bay area communities, we have the insight, drive, capacity and capital to take a moral s tand and do all we can to restore a safe climate within our own boundaries and on behalf of our plenary community; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Cupertino recognizes and declares that we face a Climate Emergency that threatens our city, region, state, nation, civiliza ti on, humanity and the natural world; 11/19/19 9 of 237 Resolution 18-094 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Cupertino City Council calls for an emergency mobilization effort to end citywide greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, educate residents about climate change, and work to advocate for a mass mobilization at the local, state, national, and g lob al levels; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Cupertino commits to keeping the considerations of disadvantaged communities central to all climate emergency mobilization planning processes, and to inviting and encouraging these communities to directly advocate for their specific needs and equity in the environmental justice process; BE .IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Cupertino calls on the State of California, United States of America and all governments and peoples worldwide to initiate an emergency mobili zation effort to mitigate climate change, stop rising greenh ouse gas emissions, and immediately initiate an effort to safely draw down carbon from the atmosphere. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 18th day of September, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Members of the City Council Paul, Sinks, Chang, Scharf, Vaidhyanathan None None None APPROVED: Grace Schmidt, City Clerk ~cy Paul, May,o 1 City of Cupertin p 11/19/19 10 of 237 Green Building Reach Code Community Workshop October 16, 2019 City of Cupertino Sustainability Commission 11/19/19 11 of 237 6:00pm Welcome Councilmember Rod Sinks 6:10pm Introduction Meera Ramanathan & Vignesh Swaminathan, Reach Code Subcommittee Co-Chairs 6:25pm Climate Action + Andre Duurvoort, Sustainability Manager Reach Code Background 6:45pm Green Building + Walker Wells, Raimi + Associates Reach Code Opportunities 8:00pm Closing + Next Steps Andre Duurvoort, Sustainability Manager 2 Agenda 7:15pm Tabletop Discussions + Report Out 11/19/19 12 of 237 Considerations for Today What is important for our environmental and climate action goals? What are the financial/safety/environmental benefits and who realizes them? What is the scope and applicability of the reach code? How does this reach code impact construction and consumer costs? Welcome! 3 11/19/19 13 of 237 Why is a reach code right for Cupertino? Climate Action + Background 11/19/19 14 of 237 •Why: Part of the Sustainability Commission work program •Scope:new construction at time of building permit application •Questions: •How can the reach code best support the Climate Action Plan? •How to best mitigate climate impact of development for next 3 years Green/electrification reach codes 5 11/19/19 15 of 237 •“Reach” beyond the base building code •Support community priorities (CAP) •Includes additional requirements, such as: •Energy/water efficiency •Electric vs. fossil fuels •EV charging infrastructure •Solar PV •Construction waste management What is a local reach code? 6 11/19/19 16 of 237 Cupertino community emissions rate (draft) •Total emissions decreased 24% since 2010 •Electricity emissions decreased 95% since 2010 •Natural gas and transportation growing as percentage of total emissions Transportation Transportation Transportation Natural Gas Natural Gas Natural Gas Electricity Electricity Electricity Off-Road Off-Road Off-Road Wastewater Wastewater Wastewater Solid Waste Solid Waste Solid Waste 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 2010 2015 2018Emissions (MT CO2e)2020 Emissions Reduction Target: 287,870 MT CO2e 7 11/19/19 17 of 237 Cupertino community emissions forecast •As of 2018, emissions are 24% below 2010 levels and the 2020 target has been achieved •Emissions with State policies are projected to be 32% / 26% below 2010 by 2035/2050 •Additional emissions reductions will be needed to achieve Cupertino’s 2035 and 2050 targets (49% / 83% below 2010) 309,488 355,791 231,787 249,812258,659 172,723 57,574 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050Total Emissions (MT CO2e)Additional emissions reduction needed to achieve target 8 11/19/19 18 of 237 Statewide Reach Codes 9 San Jose Electric Preferred Menlo Park All-Electric + Solar PV Berkeley Natural Gas Ban 11/19/19 19 of 237 Walker Wells Green Building + Reach Code Opportunities 11/19/19 20 of 237 Green Building Trends State Climate Goals •SB 350 –Double energy efficiency for natural gas and electricity use •AB 802 –Building energy use benchmarking and disclosure •AB 3232 –Requires the CEC to create a plan by 2021 to reduce building sector emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 •Health and equity co-benefits 2019 Reach Code Trends •Solar installations •All-electric buildings •Increased energy and water efficiency 2022 Code Cycle •ZNE standard for buildings •All-Electric Buildings 2030 Long-Range Goal of Net Zero for all Buildings California Emissions Reduction Goals (from 1990 levels) 40% by 2030 80% by 2050 11 11/19/19 21 of 237 12 Base 2019 CALGreen Code Current Cupertino Green Building Program Energy Efficiency Reach Code (CALGreenTier 1) Green Building Potential Improved PerformanceAll-Electric Reach Code Current Baseline11/19/19 22 of 237 13 Cupertino’s Green Building Program Project Type Minimum Green Building Requirement Required Verification Residential Single Family and Multi-family homes equal to or less than 9 homes CALGreen Building Code in accordance with CALGreen’s minimum thresholds City Review Single Family and Multi-family homes equal to or greater than 9 homes •GPR certified at min. 50 pts or •LEED Silver •Alternate Reference Standard per Section 101.10.2 •Third Party GPR or LEED certification as applicable •Alternate Reference Standard Nonresidential Small: less than 25,000 SF CALGreen Building Code City Review Mid-size: 25,000-50,000 SF •LEED Certified or •Alternate Reference Standard per Section 101.10.2 •Third Party GPR or LEED certification as applicable •Alternate Reference Standard Large: greater than 50,000 SF •LEED Silver or •Alternate Reference Standard per Section 101.10.2 •Third Party GPR or LEED certification as applicable •Alternate Reference Standard New Construction 11/19/19 23 of 237 Proposed Reach Code Requirements Energy Mixed Fuel Buildings Prepare for future conversion of gas appliances to electric: 1.Electric-Ready Water Heating 2.Electric-Ready Space Heating 3.Electric-Ready Cooktop 4.Electric Ready Clothes Drying Performance approach compliance: All-Electric buildings meet code. 1.Energy Efficiency Design Rating of Proposed Design Building is no greater than that of the Standard Design Building 2.Total Energy Design Rating for Proposed Design Building is 10 points less than that of the Standard Design Building 3.Mixed-fuel buildings may not follow the prescriptive compliance approach 4.Certificate of Compliance must be completed by a Certified Energy Analyst (CEA) for all buildings All-Electric buildings meet code. CALGreen Tier 2 All Buildings A4.1 Planning and Design 1.Topsoil protection and reuse (A4.106.2.3) 2.30% of total parking, walking, or patio surfaces shall be permeable (A4.106.4) 3.Cool Roof (A.106.5) 4.Select 4 Elective Measures A4.3 Water Efficiency and Conservation 1.Plumbing fixtures and fittings shall comply with (A4.303.1) 2.Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.2 gallons per cycle (A4.303.1.4.3) 3.Developments shall comply with Cupertino’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) 4.Select 3 Elective Measures A4.4 Material Conservation and Resource Efficiency 1.25% cement foundation mix design reduction (fly ash, slag, etc.) (A4.403.2) 2.15%Recycled Content Value (RCV) (A4.405.3) 3.75%diversion of C&D debris (A4.408.1) 4.Select 4 Elective Measures A4.5 Environmental Quality 1.100%of resilient flooring shall be low VOC (A4.504.2) 2.Thermal insulation shall be low VOC and have no-added formaldehyde (NAF) (A4.504.3) 3.Select 1 Elective Measure Residential New Construction 14 11/19/19 24 of 237 Proposed Reach Code Requirements Energy Mixed Fuel Buildings Prepare for future conversion of gas appliances to electric: 1.Electric-Ready Water Heating 2.Electric-Ready Space Heating 3.Electric-Ready Cooktop 4.Electric Ready Clothes Drying Performance approach compliance: 1.Energy Compliance Margins: 2.Mixed-fuel buildings may not follow the prescriptive compliance approach 3.Certificate of Compliance must be completed by a Certified Energy Analyst (CEA) for all buildings All-Electric buildings meet code. CALGreen Tier 2 All Buildings A5.1 Planning and Design 1.12% total spaces for fuel-efficient vehicles (A5.106.5) 2.Cool Roof (A.106.5) 3.Select 3 Elective Measures (out of 11) A5.3 Water Efficiency and Conservation 1.20%reduction in baseline water use (A5.303.2.3) 2.Select 3 Elective Measures (out of 10) A5.4 Material Conservation and Resource Efficiency 1.15% Recycled Content Value (RCV) (A5.405.4) 2.80%diversion of C&D debris (A5.408.3) 3.Select 3 Elective Measures (out of 14) A5.5 Environmental Quality 1.100% of resilient flooring shall be low VOC and FloorScore or GREENGUARD certified (A5.504.4.7.1) 2.Thermal insulation shall be low VOC and have no-added formaldehyde (NAF) (A5.504.4.8.1) 3.Select 3 Elective Measures (out of 15) Nonresidential New Construction Occupancy Type Compliance Margins Office Building 10% Retail 10% Hotel/motel and High-rise Residential 5% Industrial/Manufacturing 0% All other Nonresidential Occupancies 5% 15 11/19/19 25 of 237 Cost Effectiveness of Increased Energy Efficiency CEC Cost Effectiveness = Measure pays for itself in savings over the course of its lifetime. CALGreen Tiers 1 + 2 determined to be cost-effective as part of 2019 California Building Standards Code adoption process. Based on modeling using State-approved compliance software, all new construction in Cupertino is projected to meet a Tier 1 energy reach code by including a combination of building envelope and/or systems measures. 16 Building Envelope Building Systems Window Glazing HVAC Roof Insulation Pumps + Fans Wall Insulation Hot Water Heater Window Overhang Lighting 11/19/19 26 of 237 Residential Electrification Cost Considerations Avg. Capital cost savings: $3,000-$10,000/dwelling unit Avg. Lifecycle Savings: $330/year Source: E3 Residential Building Electrification in California 17 Single Family Low-Rise Multi-Family 11/19/19 27 of 237 Nonresidential Electrification Cost Considerations 18 Medium Office Medium Retail Small Hotel Incremental Cost Savings $2,363 $17,327 $1,263,932 For nonresidential new construction: Incremental cost of all-electric design with energy efficiency measures and federal minimum appliance efficiencies. Savings are likely the result of not installing natural gas service. Source: CEC 2019 Nonresidential New Construction Reach Code Cost Effectiveness Study 11/19/19 28 of 237 1.Single Family Home –New Construction & Remodel 2.High-Rise Mixed-Use New Construction 3.Office & Hotel New Construction 4.Electric Vehicle Readiness 5.City Processes –Outreach, Verification, Incentives 19 Tabletop Discussion Topics 11/19/19 29 of 237 Next Steps •Public outreach event –October 16 •Publish draft ordinance –Late October •Stakeholder outreach –ongoing •Sustainability division staff report –TBD •1st Council reading –November 19th •2nd Council reading –December 3rd •Implementation begins –early 2020 20 11/19/19 30 of 237 Questions? 21 11/19/19 31 of 237 Sustainability Commission Written Communications (Reach code discussions, multiple meetings) 11/19/19 32 of 237 From:Scott Shell To:City of Cupertino Sustainability Commission Subject:Building Electrification Date:Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:45:31 AM Attachments:190821 Cost effectiveness of all electric buildings.pptx Dear members of the Cupertino Sustainability Commission, I am unable to make your special meeting today, but I wanted to write in support of building electrification. Our 65 person architectural firm has been designing all electric buildings since 2001, and can attest that it is affordable, reliable, and a good solution for our clients. Our largest client is the University of California which now prohibits gas for heating or hot water on all new buildings on all ten of their campuses for all building types including academic, student housing, office, labs, etc. When electrification reach codes started to be discussed, I reached out to the mechanical engineers we work with and interviewed them asking if the building industry as a whole was ready for all electric buildings and if it was cost effective. Their answer was YES. I’ve attached a slide deck summarizing their comments and showing dozens of all electric buildings from different firms. If there is a problem with our buildings after construction, our firm is responsible and I get those phone calls, so we have to be very confident in a solution before we recommend it to our clients. We are now recommending to all our clients today to go all electric. I would like to strongly advocate for an electric reach code similar to Menlo Park. https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/08/28/menlo-park-opts-for-a-natural-gas-ban-almost-as- restrictive-as-berkeley/ In their staff report to council they say why they decided on requiring all electric (with exceptions) rather than relying on incentives—because incentives are only partially effective. https://www.menlopark.org/DocumentCenter/View/22645/H4---20190827-Reach-codes-CC Here is the excerpt: “For example, Sonoma Clean Power offered significant rebates to electrify the rebuild of homes after the 2017 wildfires. Permit applicants could choose between higher energy efficiency standards for a $7,500 rebate or all-electric standard for a $12,500 rebate. In addition to the all-electric rebate, a homeowner would save on upfront construction costs by not installing natural gas infrastructure. As a result of the rebate program, only one-third of permit applicants or homeowners choose the all- electric home. It showed that incentive type regulations based on cost savings fall short on achieving the desired outcome.” So Menlo Park decided to require electric for everything but gas stoves and fireplaces in single family--the two appliances that people cared about. In multifamily it is now typical to have electric stoves and not have gas inside each unit because running the gas piping is too expensive. They also made an exception for Life Science Research Labs for heating only based on one developers advocacy, and the Council put in place an appeals process for cases that they could not 11/19/19 33 of 237 foresee. Only one person spoke in opposition at the council meeting. I believe the Reach Codes that require a 5% or 10% more energy efficient design will not be a strong motivation. Our firm is required to beat Title 24 energy code by 20% by many clients and it is just not that difficult to do. So I encourage you to recommend an all electric requirement, with exceptions as you see appropriate. Sincerely, Scott Shell Scott Shell FAIA, LEED® AP BD+C, CPHC® Principal Pier 1 The Embarcadero, Bay 2 San Francisco, CA 94111 11/19/19 34 of 237 11/19/19 35 of 237 Casa Adelante, 2060 Folsom, San Francisco Maceo May Veterans Apartments, Treasure Island Balboa Upper Yard Family Apts, San Francisco Malcolm Harris, Principal We have a number of all-electric multifamily housing projects. I’m a huge, huge fan of this change to all-electric multifamily housing. It is better in every way, a great simplification of the system. Less expensive, higher performance, less maintenance, more sustainable. It is a major cost saving move that pays for a lot of other upgrades. At Maceo May we saw big savings from eliminating gas fired hydronic heating, the gas connection, and the solar thermal required by T24. The savings paid for continuous exterior insulation, energy recovery ventilators (eliminating Z-ducts), electric resistance heat, and PVs.With these upgrades we are beating Title 24 by 20%, getting more Green Points, and lower GHGs on a grid that’s getting cleaner. The occupants get better indoor air quality benefits from the energy recovery ventilators. 11/19/19 36 of 237 Hunters Point Shipyard Block 52, San Francisco Hunters Point Shipyard Block 54, San Francisco 681 Florida, San Francisco Malcolm Harris, Principal Overall the system is just much simpler—there is just one energy system —electrical, rather than two. The gas fired boiler & hydronic systems are very problematic at every step from design to construction to maintenance.During construction there are often leaks.Commissioning is a constant challenge, and there are lots of tenant complaints in first few months.Operations is challenging as maintenance staff are not equipped to operate the digital BMS system. Casa Adelante 127 residential Units, 9 stories, under construction. Developers: TNDC/CCDC, Architect: Mithun & YA Studio. Maceo May 105 residential units, in permitting. Chinatown Community Development Center, Swords to Plowshares. Balboa Upper Yard Family Apts 120 residential units, in design development. Developer Mission Housing Development & Related California. Hunters Point Shipyard Block 52 136 residential units total, Design Development. Developer McCormack, Baron, Salazar. Hunters Point Shipyard Block 54 136 residential units total, Design Development. Developer McCormack, Baron, Salazar. 681 Florida 136 residential units total, In Design Development. Developers: TNDC & MEDA 11/19/19 37 of 237 Santana Row Lot 11 UC Davis Webster Hall Replacement American Geophysical Union Hormoz Janssens, Principal Almost all our projects are all-electric, I have only been using gas systems where required by the client. Electric is almost always less expensive or cost neutral. Very rarely is it more expensive. Often it is our value engineering option. Most project types work just fine. We are doing a 500,000 sf all electric office for Microsoft, with major cost savings using heat pumps vs a central plant. We do lots of detailed cost analysis with developers to find the most cost-effective solution. For example, at Bay Meadows our all electric design for 1 million sf of development was significantly less expensive than a traditional rooftop package unit + boiler + reheat system. 11/19/19 38 of 237 UC Santa Cruz Student Housing West 270 Brannan, San Francisco Chatam University Dining Commons Hormoz Janssens, Principal The space requirements are smaller for all-electric, instead of having two to three separate systems for space heating, cooling, and hot water, we can do it with a single heat pump system, that space can be used for other things or the building made smaller for more savings. Maintenance is less than most conventional systems because you have just one system. Maintenance is just like an air-conditioning system, it’s the same thing in reverse, and you eliminate the boiler. A huge benefit for heat pumps is reducing water use. Using an air source heat pump for cooling rather than a cooling tower has large water savings. We’ve done several all electric commercial food service projects that have been very successful. The Chef’s quite skeptical at the beginning, but now say they will never go back to cooking on gas. 11/19/19 39 of 237 UC Santa Cruz Student Housing West UC Irvine Student Housing West, Developer ACC UC Riverside Dundee Residence Hall, Developer ACC David Phillips, Associate Vice President for Energy & Sustainability UC Office of the President The University of California has committed to carbon neutrality by 2025. We are prioritizing all-electric new buildings (required starting June 2019), and then electrifying existing buildings & systems over time. Our studies show that all electric mechanical equipment capital costs are comparable for academic & lab buildings, and the costs are lower for residential buildings. Twenty year life cycle costs are comparable for Academic and labs buildings, and lower for residential buildings. UC has many all-electric housing projects, office buildings, and laboratories now in place and many more in design. UC’s carbon neutrality strategies are pragmatic: don’t allow growth to increase carbon emissions; and then transition existing buildings and systems off fossil fuels over time. Decarbonizing Your Campus thru Electrification, SCUP 2019 11/19/19 40 of 237 Exploratorium, San Francisco Packard Foundation, Los Altos Marin Country Day School, Corte Madera Scott Shell, Principal We have completed a dozen or so all electric buildings. 10-15 years ago it was not common in California, and we saw some cost premium on those early projects. In the last 5-7 years all-electric has become much more common on our projects which are primarily commercial and educational. It is now generally cost neutral or less expensive. There are more manufacturers providing equipment, and the subcontractors are more familiar with installing it. Last year we had an all-electric project go to bid and the total cost came back higher than expected. In an attempt to reduce cost, we asked the mechanical contactors to price a standard gas heating system instead. They came back with no cost savings between gas and all electric, so the client decided to stay with the preferred all-electric option. 11/19/19 41 of 237 Mark Day School, San Rafael Boulder Commons Lick Wilmerding High School, San Francisco Scott Shell, Principal When the University of California, one of our largest clients, decided to prohibit gas in new projects that really got our attention. It now seems irresponsible to recommend gas to our clients who may then have to retrofit them before that equipment reaches the end of its life in order to meet their carbon goals or local mandates to decarbonize. We don’t want to be saddling our clients with stranded assets. Last year I interviewed seven leading mechanical engineers that we work with asking if the building industry is ready to go all electric. They agreed that the vast majority of buildings can go all-electric, and the cost is competitive with a few exceptions. Most of our all electric projects also include PVs, it is LESS expensive for our clients to get their electricity from PV than from their utility. With a power purchase agreement there is no out of pocket cost. Some clients decided to fund the PVs themselves since it provides a favorable financial return. Ten years ago solar was seen as an expensive solution for projects with big budgets. It is amazing to see how quickly that has flipped. 11/19/19 42 of 237 Batik Apartments, Seattle Cascade Apartments, Seattle 4700 Brooklyn Ave NE, Seattle Shawn Oram , Principal Ecotope has completed 26 central heat pump water heating projects since 2008, mostly 100-500 unit projects. Partial list: 1200 NE 45th, Seattle August Apartments, Seattle Jackson Apartments, Seattle 11/19/19 43 of 237 Coliseum Place, Oakland Peter Waller, Principal We have several current all-electric multi-family projects. In our experience it has been indispensable to have a knowledgeable energy/Title 24 consultant on the team to help guide both analysis and design. It is critical to share information about best practices and lessons learned. By sharing best practices we can reduce mistakes. We work with both non-profit and for-profit housing developers that own and operate lots of buildings. It is important to make sure everyone is aware of the potential challenges that come with new technology. The life span of the current generation of heat pump water heaters may be less than the traditional gas fired boilers, depending on operating conditions.We expect the life span will increase as the market becomes deeper and more sophisticated,but we try to be open about this reality with our clients.With that in mind provide access for maintenance and future replacement down the road. . Altamira Family Apartments, Sonoma 11/19/19 44 of 237 Quetzal Gardens, San Jose Valley Glen, Dixon Plaza Point, Arcata Sean Armstrong, Redwood Energy All-electric construction consistently reduces construction costs and ongoing utility bills. It saves between $2,500 and $5,000 per residence for the developer to not plumb gas. When infrastructure and appliance costs are added up, a recent study done by Rocky Mountain Institute found a median increased cost of $8,800 more per house for gas infrastructure, piping, purchasing appliances and venting Only education is preventing developers from profiting from the technological innovations available in the all-electric domain. Developers have been choosing all electric construction because it cost less to build and that trend has been going on for 24 years now. New construction is easy technically and financially and because the construction cost savings justify going all-electric. 11/19/19 45 of 237 Cloverdale, Corporation for Better Housing Colonial House Apartments, Oxnard Atascadero, Corporation for Better Housing Sean Armstrong, Redwood Energy New construction is easy technically and financially and because the construction cost savings justify going all-electric. Because an all-electric building can achieve higher mechanical system efficiency than a gas burning building, it is lower cost for developers building all-electric to comply with the Title 24 Energy Code. We documented this is our report A Zero Emissions All-Electric Multi-family Construction Guide, see the graphic on page 7. https://fossilfreebuildings.org/ElectricMFGuide.pdf 11/19/19 46 of 237 152 N. 3rd, San Jose Peter Rumsey, Principal There are great examples of all electric buildings for virtually every building type that are cost effective. It is very easy for our firm to design these systems, we are very familiar with them. For Multifamily projects we are seeing a lot of developers use electric heating with high levels of insulation in apartments that don’t need cooling. All electric air-cooled VRF heat pumps are very common on multifamily projects up to ten stories where cooling is needed; this is very cost effective. Developers are using VRF systems on small to medium sized commercial buildings. Production home builders have been using central heat pump heating and cooling units for many years. And we are seeing a surge in the use of larger heat pumps for generating hot water systems. Central hot water systems can have a cost premium, but it is very small as a percentage of the building cost. The Tidelands Housing, San Francisco 11/19/19 47 of 237 The Exploratorium, San Francisco Pier 70, Building 12 Peter Rumsey, Principal Large 20 story multifamily high-rise require a water source heat pump and that equipment still has a cost premium. Cooking remains a hard sell in many cases, a lot of people are very skeptical of giving up gas. Technically this isn’t a problem, the experts at the Food Service Technology Center in San Ramon say an electric fryer provides better and more even heat than gas. Induction ranges are excellent. The market for all electric buildings and heat pumps has been making significant inroads in California, and this had gotten the attention of manufacturers. General Contractors and mechanical subcontractors are getting more familiar with this approach as well. Title 24 used to discourage electric heating of all types and is now more neutral on the issue. I understand that future versions of title 24 are going to be more encouraging of some types of electric heating. 11/19/19 48 of 237 Alexander Valley Medical Center Goldman School of Public Policy + Housing SMUD Office & Operations Building, Sacramento Ted Tiffany, Principal We have designed quite a few all electric buildings. The Goldman School of Public Policy is as designed all-electric and construction cost compared favorably to gas. This also allowed for individually metered apartments so tenants paid their own utility bills. The UCOP did a robust cost analysis of various building types and in almost all cases it found lower life cycle costs with all-electric buildings. It is important to manage TOU rates. First cost savings are partly dependent on if you can eliminate the gas service, which in most cases you can; if you do this generally makes the construction cost less than mixed fuel buildings. https://www.ucop.edu/sustainability/_files/Carbon%20Neutral%20New %20Building%20Cost%20Study%20FinalReport.pdf 11/19/19 49 of 237 Ted Tiffany, Principal For most building types and sizes, there is no technical reason preventing the industry from shifting to all-electric buildings. Laboratories and Hospitals can be more of a challenge as all electric due to the high outside air loads, demands for sterilization, and high hot water loads.They are possible, but more challenging. Sonoma Clean Power Silver Oak Winery Albany High School 11/19/19 50 of 237 J. Craig Venter Institute Lab, San Diego SFO Consolidated Admin Facility Integrated Genomics Lab, LBNL Eric Solrain, Principal Integral currently has dozens of all-electric buildings recently complete, in construction, and in design. There has been a big sea change in recent years towards all-electric. Around 50% of our work is currently electric. There is lot of momentum in Multi-family Residential and in Commercial projects moving to electric systems. Comparing the construction cost of all-electric to gas depends on what you are comparing it to. If comparing to a high-performance design such as LEED Gold then all-electric is cheaper. If comparing to moderate performance building then all-electric is cost neutral. If comparing to the most basic design, there may be a small cost premium. There are some significant code changes in California energy code in 2019 that will make all electric even more cost competitive, especially for multifamily. 11/19/19 51 of 237 435 Indio, Sunnyvale 415 Mathilda, Sunnyvale 380 N. Pastoria, Mountain View Eric Solrain, Principal All electric has several big advantages: •Electric equipment takes up significantly less space and that space can be used for other things. At 1700 Webster the gas option filled the roof with equipment, while the heat pump option had much less equipment so they were able to put a nice deck and pool on the roof. •Getting gas service to the equipment, and a flue out through the building can be challenging problems and cost money. Getting make- up air to gas boilers can be challenging. •For large multi-family projects heat-pump dryers avoid all the problems associate with venting. •There have been good advances in heat pump choices in recent years. Aermec and Climacool make excellent equipment, that can heat and cool simultaneously with robust controls. •There are huge climate benefits to shifting from gas to electric. London is completely redoing it’s 10 year old decarbonization plan which was drafted when they had a dirty electric grid. Their grid is much cleaner now so they are quickly revising the plan to promote electrification. 11/19/19 52 of 237 Edwina Benner, Sunnyvale Stoddard Housing, Napa Casa Adelante, San Francisco Nick Young In multifamily buildings with individual heating and hot water systems for each unit it’s a no-brainer to go all-electric, from a cost, modeling, technology, and code compliance perspective. All-electric should be the standard design for these projects. For Multifamily buildings with central domestic hot water there are also excellent options using electric heat pumps. We are seeing these projects go with Sanden, Colmac, and Nyle heat pumps. A significant challenge is that Title 24 doesn’t have a modeling pathway for central hot water systems. The CEC is working on fixing this, targeting the 2019 code cycle. Our all-electric multi-family projects include: Edwina Benner Plaza in Sunnyvale, 2437 Eagle Ave in Alameda, St Paul’s Commons in Walnut Creek, Stoddard Housing in Napa, Casa Adelante in San Francisco, and Maceo May in San Francisco. 11/19/19 53 of 237 October 15, 2019 Steven Scharf, Mayor SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL City of Cupertino Attn: Cupertino City Council 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 sscharf@cupertino.org RE: City of Cupertino Development of Reach Codes Dear Mayor Steven Scharf: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the City of Cupertino’s proposed Reach Codes aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the building sector. The Western Propane Gas Association (WPGA) seeks to be a valuable contributor in both the development of these codes and the policies and procedures that may emerge as a result of these discussions. While we applaud efforts for building decarbonization, WPGA believes that Reach Codes disincentivizing propane as a complementary fuel source to electric are fundamentally misguided. WPGA hopes that regulators will look to the example that the City of San Luis Obispo is setting with the development of their Reach Codes and recognize the value that propane provides on a number of levels. Propane provides affordable, clean energy for low income communities as well as a vital back-up power for solar powered homes when battery power is low. Disincentivizing propane as a complementary power to solar has an unintended consequence to make solar homes more expensive and less reliable when power generation is not at peak levels. Furthermore, there has been numerous discussions throughout California regarding planned power outages and safety black-outs. In a recent article published by Politico (PG&E begins massive power shut-off in California to avoid wildfires) it is noted that the Public Safety Power Shutoff could affect 2.4 million electricity users. Propane delivers energy resiliency for communities facing safety black-outs which can be critical for those powering life-sustaining equipment. Vulnerable citizens such as people on dialysis or simply the many individuals using electric powered wheelchairs can use propane energy for reliable power. When looking towards the future, our industry is investing in renewable propane, derived from sustainable sources like beef tallow or vegetable oil. We hope that regulators take a more holistic view of the complementary role propane plays alongside decarbonization efforts including solar, wind and other renewable fuels. The Western Propane Gas Association appreciates your work in this area and looks forward to working with you as the City of Cupertino and the State strive to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through comprehensive clean energy solutions. Sincerely, Ben Granholm Regulatory Affairs Specialist cc: Andre Duurvoot, Sustainability Manager 11/19/19 54 of 237 From:Scott Shell To:City of Cupertino Sustainability Commission Subject:electrification reach code Date:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:43:09 AM Dear members of the Cupertino Sustainability Commission, I am unable to make your meeting on 10/24, but would like to encourage you to recommend an electric reach code that requires electric heating and hot water as your peer cities are doing. These appliances are ~90% of residential gas use, and are the most expensive and difficult to retrofit later. Exceptions can be allowed for cooking if desired, and if a stove is pre-wired, no retrofit is required—just replace the appliance. I also encourage you to apply the ordinance to ALL buildings (with exceptions for specific building types if required). San Francisco reports that 97% of their new residential units have been in high rise residential, so these projects need to be included as well as commercial. Thank you for all your work on this key issue. Scott Scott Shell FAIA, LEED® AP BD+C, CPHC® Principal Pier 1 The Embarcadero, Bay 2 San Francisco, CA 94111 +1 415-214-7277 11/19/19 55 of 237 From:Rand, Stephanie on behalf of Kenney, Robert To:City of Cupertino Sustainability Commission Cc:Berman, Janice; Cline, Darin; Brooks, Anna; Cunningham, Kelly; Kenney, Robert; Andre Duurvoort; Albert Salvador, P.E., C.B.O; aimee.bailey@svcleanenergy.org Subject:All-Electric New Construction Support Date:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 3:10:05 PM Attachments:All-Electric New Construction Support Letter RKenney 2019 Cupertino.docx.pdfDear Sustainability Commission, Attached please find my letter regarding PG&E’s All-Electric New Construction Supportfor the City of Cupertino. Sincerely, Robert Robert S. Kenney Vice President State and Regulatory Affairs Pacific Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 77000 Mail Code B23A San Francisco, CA 94177-00001 Robert.Kenney@pge.com (415) 973-2500 (office) 11/19/19 56 of 237 Robert S. Kenney Vice President State and Regulatory Affairs P. O. Box 77000 San Francisco, CA 94177-00001 Mail Code B23A (415) 973-2500 Robert.Kenney@pge.com October 22, 2019 VIA EMAIL TO: sustainabilitycommission@cupertino.org Sustainability Commission City Hall City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Sustainability Commission: Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is proud to provide electric and natural gas service to the City of Cupertino. And we are committed to helping customers and the community achieve their energy goals. As part of this commitment, PG&E welcomes the opportunity to support the City of Cupertino’s efforts to promote efficient, all-electric new construction, when it is cost-effective. PG&E strongly supports California’s climate and clean air goals. We recognize that achieving these goals requires a range of approaches and tools, including increasing the use of energy-efficient electric appliances in buildings when cost-effective. PG&E welcomes the opportunity to avoid investments in new gas assets that might later prove underutilized as local governments and the state work together to realize long-term decarbonization objectives. With all this in mind, PG&E supports local government policies that promote all-electric new construction when cost effective. Beyond new construction, PG&E believes a multi-faceted approach is needed to cost-effectively achieve California’s broader economy-wide long-term GHG reduction objectives, including both electrification and decarbonizing the gas system with renewable natural gas and hydrogen. As California’s decarbonization policies evolve, PG&E will continue to ensure the safe and reliable operation of the electric and gas systems to continue supporting the customers that depend on us. PG&E appreciates the partnership with the City of Cupertino during its policy development process, which allows us to prepare for the future and continue providing the best service possible to customers. PG&E continuously forecasts load in its service territory and implements upgrades to the distribution grid to meet the demand. PG&E fully expects to meet the needs that all-electric buildings will require. PG&E remains ready to engage with our customers, local government, businesses, and community members to meet their needs safely, reliably, affordably, and with clean energy. PG&E looks forward to continuing to work with the City of Cupertino to accomplish its policy goals. 11/19/19 57 of 237 October 22, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Thank you, and have a safe day. Sincerely, Robert S. Kenney Vice President cc: Andre Duurvoort, Sustainability Manager [AndreD@cupertino.org] Albert Salvador, Building Official [AlbertS@cupertino.org] Aimee Bailey, Ph.D., Director of Decarbonization and Grid Innovation, Silicon Valley Clean Energy [aimee.bailey@svcleanenergy.org] Anna Brooks, Sr. Manager, Public Affairs, PG&E [anna.brooks@pge.com] Darin Cline, Sr. Manager, Government Relations, PG&E [Darin.Cline@pge.com] 11/19/19 58 of 237 From:BRUCE KARNEY To:Andre Duurvoort; Gilee Corral Cc:; Anna Weber; Vignesh Swaminathan; Meera Ramanathan; Angela Chen Subject:Fwd: Natural Gas Cooking as a Social Justice Issue Date:Wednesday, October 23, 2019 9:37:03 AM For your consideration in developing the Cupertino Reach Code... Cheers, Bruce Karney ---------- Original Message ---------- From: BRUCE KARNEY <> Date: October 23, 2019 at 8:54 AM Subject: Natural Gas Cooking as a Social Justice Issue At last night's Mtn. View Council Meeting I heard a new argument for banning natural gas kitchen appliances in single family homes. I thought it was a rather compelling notion that other advocates might want to share with their City Councils. Credit for this idea goes to Vice Mayor Margaret Abe-Koga. Her perspective is that if a reach code requires all-electric kitchens in new multi-family homes, but not in new single family homes, then it essentially is giving a "license to pollute" to only those who are wealthy enough to buy a new single family home. It gives an option to the owners of new single family that renters and condo-residents do not have. This, it is a form of discrimination based on wealth. Rather than addressing this disparity by allowing natural gas kitchens in multi-family residences, the Vice Mayor recommended eliminating the natural gas option in new single family homes. The rest of the Council agreed, and her modification to the staff proposal was adopted on a unanimous vote. Starting in 2020, new residences in Mountain View, whether single-family or multi-family, will have all-electric kitchens. Cheers, Bruce Karney Chair, Carbon Free Mountain View 11/19/19 59 of 237 From:Rod Sinks To:BRUCE KARNEY Cc:Andre Duurvoort; Gilee Corral; Gary Latshaw; Anna Weber; Vignesh Swaminathan; Meera Ramanathan; Angela Chen Subject:Re: Natural Gas Cooking as a Social Justice Issue Date:Wednesday, October 23, 2019 10:42:44 AM Yes, I watched the meeting and have asked for a written summary of Mountain View council's actions. They also mandated electricity in commercial kitchens, with a waiver process to allow exceptions for preparing cuisine when there is no electric option (like Menlo Park). I think it would be useful for the Sustainability Commission and the Council to understand what actions Mountain View, Menlo Park and San Jose have taken. Rod On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:37 AM BRUCE KARNEY <> wrote: For your consideration in developing the Cupertino Reach Code... Cheers, Bruce Karney ---------- Original Message ---------- From: BRUCE KARNEY <> Date: October 23, 2019 at 8:54 AM Subject: Natural Gas Cooking as a Social Justice Issue At last night's Mtn. View Council Meeting I heard a new argument for banning natural gas kitchen appliances in single family homes. I thought it was a rather compelling notion that other advocates might want to share with their City Councils. Credit for this idea goes to Vice Mayor Margaret Abe-Koga. Her perspective is that if a reach code requires all-electric kitchens in new multi-family homes, but not in new single family homes, then it essentially is giving a "license to pollute" to only those who are wealthy enough to buy a new single family home. It gives an option to the owners of new single family that renters and condo-residents do not have. This, it is a form of discrimination based on wealth. Rather than addressing this disparity by allowing natural gas kitchens in multi-family residences, the Vice Mayor recommended eliminating the natural gas option in new single family homes. The rest of the Council agreed, and her modification to the staff proposal was adopted on a unanimous vote. Starting in 2020, new residences in Mountain View, whether single-family or multi-family, will have all-electric kitchens. Cheers, Bruce Karney 11/19/19 60 of 237 Chair, Carbon Free Mountain View 11/19/19 61 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Fellow Commissioners and Cupertino Environmental Staff Cc: Ro Khanna, Tom Pyke, and Rod Sinks In view of the recent publication of the IPCC – Special Report Oceans and Cryosphere, along with other scientifically reviewed publications, I feel that the proposed Reach Codes (Staff’s October 24th Report) are inadequate to meet the needs of reducing carbon emissions. Building codes are designed, in part, to consider low probability, but potentially ruinous events can be avoided. Historically the codes have addressed such issues as: structural integrity, earthquake resilience, water & air safety, cost effectiveness, and other factors that are important for the long-term utility of the structure. In recent years the State of Cali fornia has recognized the necessity of moving society to zero-net greenhouse gas emission society and has mandated the codes address this need. The Reach Codes are designed to meet that goal of reducing greenhouse gases. However, given the recent scientific reports they do not provide for a rapid enough transition. In fact, upon reviewing the Staff Report, I feel the Environmental Commission needs to reexamine the climate goals that drive the Climate Action Plan. I am suggesting the following for the re ach code: 1. All Electric Construction – No natural gas a. Several Cities have already done this (Berkeley and Menlo Park) while several others are in the process of doing so (Mt. View, San Jose). b. Removal of natural gas is essential to allow the complete disma ntling of the natural gas infrastructure, which includes of 3 million miles of pipelines. c. Apply the ban for all types of buildings unless a compelling need can be established. d. Recent publications point to the serious degradation to internal air quality 1 caused by natural gas cookstove cooking. 2. EV adoption – Required to eliminate the use of Fossil-Fuel Vehicles a. All new construction of single-family dwellings should have 240 outlets capable of supporting level 2 charging. b. All multi-family dwellings should have 240 outlets available for every parking space or two parking spaces can share one 240 outlet. The following pages summarize recent information on the risk that climate change phenomenon might become much worse in a short period of time due to continued emissions of greenhouse gases. 1 Building Decarbonization Presentation by Panama Bartholomy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRkz_FPi6z8 11/19/19 62 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Due to climate change, which has resulted from atmospheric heating from anthropogenically introduced greenhouse gases, some of the major atmospheric and ocean flows are being altered. The most recent IPCC Special Report Oceans and Cryosphere, states succinctly1: The polar regions are losing ice, and their oceans are changing rapidly. The consequences of this polar transition extend to the whole planet and are affecting people in multiple ways2. I will briefly review these changes. The driving force of wind patterns in the Northern hemisphere comes from the difference in the temperatures of the Arctic relative to the equator. This difference causes air flows from the equator to flow northward to the Arctic. As these flows interact with the rotation of the earth, they form the polar vortex of high-speed winds in the upper atmosphere. This vortex is largely believed to provide substantial stability and provides predictable seasonal patterns. The farmers in turn depend on these patterns to select crops, growing times, harvesting times, etc. One aspect of climate change has been to warm the Arctic faster than the equator 1. This then reduces the temperature difference between the equator and the Arctic, which then reduces the speed of the air flows and, most likely, weakens the Polar Vortex. The weakened Vortex allows very cold Arctic air to flow down to midlatitudes. In recent years this has caused exceptional winters in our Northwest and very cold snaps in nominally warm places like Italy. Also, it has allowed warm air from midlatitudes to flow to the Arctic and produce exceptionally warm weather in the Arctic (see Figure 2 and Appendix B). The Arctic ice acts like a refrigerator door keeping methyl hydrates, which lie on the ocean floor, and massive organic matter frozen (often beneath glacial ice} inactive. A significant warm spell in the Arctic will lead to release of greenhouse gases from both these sources. Modest releases have already been noted. But the fear is that a confluence of a warming world, and an exceptional storm in the Arctic could lead to an ice-free period that would allow a massive release of greenhouse gases (see Figure 1). For this reason, the IPCC Special Report Ocean and Cryosphere states3: It is very likely that Arctic sea ice extent continues to decline in all months of the year; the strongest reductions in September (-12.8 ± 2.3% per decade; 1979-2018) are likely unprecedented in at least 1000 years. It is virtually certain that Arctic sea ice has thinned, concurrent with a shift to younger ice: since 1979, the areal proportion of thick ice at least 5 years old has declined by approximately 90%. It is very likely that approximately half the observed sea ice loss is attributable to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Changes in Arctic sea ice have potential to influence midlatitude weather on timescales of weeks to months (medium confidence). {3.2.1.1; Box 3.2} See Figure 3 for a graph of the declining Arctic ice. 2 IPCC Final Draft, Special Report Ocean and Cryosphere, September 2018, Chapter 3, page 3 -3 3 IPCC Final Draft, Special Report Ocean and Cryosphere, September 2018, Chapter 3, page 3 -4 11/19/19 63 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. In his recent book, A Farewell to Ice: A Report from the Arctic, Peter Wadhams4 investigates the potential damage of a possible loss of Arctic ice. He examines a release of 50 gigatons of Greenhouse Gases in Carbon dioxide equivalents. Here is part of what he concludes: The extra temperature rise due to the methane by 2040 is 0.6oC, a substantial extra contribution. This would be catastrophic for mankind, partly because it is so quick… Measured at present value the cost of this increase comes out as 60 trillion dollars over century….5 Two figures follow demonstrating some of the concepts discussed previously. Appendix A is a copy of a recent Washington Post article about the diminishing ice. Appendix B is a summary of some of the negative effects of natural gas usage. 4 Peter Wadhams is the former Director of the Scott Polar Institute in Cambridge. He has made more than 50 expeditions to both polar regions, working from ice camps, icebreakers, aircraft and uniquely, submarines. He has several awards and is a Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society and a Member of the Finnish Academy. 5 Wadhams, Peter, A Farewell to Ice: A Report from the Arctic, Oxford Press, 2017, page 125 and 126 11/19/19 64 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Figure 1: This figure describes where highly potent climate gas – methane – is in “cold” – storage in the Arctic. Much of it is in frozen methyl hydrate on the continental shelf. Some free gas is trapped at lower depths. The permafrost, which covers much of northern Siberia, Alaska, and Canada, has prevented the tons of frozen vegetation from decaying. In the decay process, microbes emit both methane and carbon dioxide. From A Farwell to Ice: The amount of methane stored in the hydrate deposits in the entire ocea n bed is estimated to be more than thirteen times the amount of carbon in the atmosphere and amounts to 10,400 Gt .6 6 Wadhams, Peter, A Farewell to Ice: A Report from the Arctic, 2017, page122 11/19/19 65 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Figure 2 – Slides provided by the Climate Reality Project Top image is a depiction of the jet stream when it diverted from its normal confines to the North Pole and split into two streams. This provided an avenue for warm air to visit the North Pole causing unprecedented high temperatures that threaten the stability of the Arctic ice. 11/19/19 66 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Figure 3: Screen shot from Polar Ice Science Center (http://psc.apl.uw.edu/research/projects/arctic-sea- ice-volume-anomaly/) in October of 2019. The above graph shows the decline in Arctic Sea Ice extent over the past 29 years. If the downward trend continues, then we are likely to see an ice-free September within the next decade. This could lead to increases in the release of methane, which is a highly potent greenhouse gas. 11/19/19 67 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Appendix A The Washington Post North Pole surges above freezing in the dead of winter, stunning scientists By Sason Sameno w 11/19/19 68 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Feb. 26, 2018 at 10:52 a.m. PST The sun won’t rise at the North Pole until March 20, and it’s normally close to the coldest time of year, but an extraordinary and possibly historic thaw swelled over the tip of the planet this weekend. Analyses show that the temperature warmed to the melt ing point as an enormous storm pumped an intense pulse of heat through the Greenland Sea. Temperatures may have soared as high as 35 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) at the pole, according to the U.S. Global Forecast System model. While there are no direct measurements of temperature there, Zack Labe, a climate scientist working on his PhD at the University of California at Irvine, confirmed that several independent analyses showed “it was very close to freezing,” which is more than 50 degrees (30 degrees Celsius) above normal. The warm intrusion penetrated right through the heart of the Central Arctic, Labe said. The temperature averaged for the entire region north of 80 degrees latitude spiked to its highest level ever recorded in February. The average temperature was more than 36 degrees (20 degrees Celsius) above normal. “No other warm intrusions were very close to this,” Labe said in an interview, describing a data set maintained by the Danish Meteorological Institute that dates back to 1958. “I was taken by surprise how expansive this warm intrusion was.” 11/19/19 69 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Such extreme warm intrusions in the Arctic, once rare, are becoming more routine, research has shown. A study published last July found that since 1980, these events are becoming more frequent, longer-lasting and more intense. “Previously this was not co mmon,” said lead author of the study Robert Graham, from the Norwegian Polar Institute, in an email. “It happened in four years between 1980-2010, but has now occurred in four out of the last five winters.” Graham explained that these warming events are related to the decline of winter sea ice in the Arctic, noting that January’s ice extent was the lowest on record. “As the sea ice is melting and thinning, it is becoming more vulnerable to these winter storms,” he explained. “The thinner ice drifts more quickly and can break up into smaller pieces. The strong winds from the south can push the ice further north into the Central Arctic, exposing the open water and releasing heat to the atmosphere from the ocean.” 11/19/19 70 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Scientists were shocked in recent days to discover open water north of Greenland, an area normally covered by old, very thick ice. “This has me more worried than the warm temps in the Arctic right now,” tweeted Mike MacFerrin, an ice sheet specialist at the University of Colorado. Such warm water is appearing to have an effect on air temperatures. At the north tip of Greenland, about 400 miles to the south of the North Pole, the weather station Cape Morris Jesup has logged a record-crushing 61 hours above freezing so far this calendar year. The previous record, dating to 1980, was 16 hours through the end of April in 2011, according to Robert Rohde, a physicist at Berkeley Earth, a nonprofit that conducts temperature analysis. At one point, the temperature was as high as 43 degrees (6.1 degrees Celsius). Kent Moore, a professor of atmospheric physics at the University of Toronto, who published a study in 2016 linking the loss of sea ice to these warm events in the Arctic, said a number of factors may have contributed to the latest warming episode. For one, he said, recent storms have tracked more toward the North Pole through the Greenland Sea, drawing heat directly north from lower latitudes, rather than through a more circuitous route 11/19/19 71 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. over the Barents Sea. He also said ocean temperatures in the Greenland Sea are warmer than normal. “The warmth we’re seeing in the Greenland Sea is definitely enhancing the warm events we’re seeing,” Moore said. “I’m surprised how warm it is, but I am not sure why.” The rise in Arctic temperatures is probably also tied to a sudden warming of the stratosphere, the atmospheric layer about 30,000 feet high — above where most weather happens — that occurred several weeks ago, Moore said. Why these stratospheric warming events happen is poorly understood, as are their consequences. However, they tend to rearrange warm and cold air masses, and this latest one has also been linked not only to the Arctic warmth but also to the “Beast from the East” cold spell over Europe. Moore stopped short of saying that the warm spikes observed in the Arctic in recent years are a sure sign that they are becoming a fixture of the winter Arctic climate; more data is needed, he cautioned. Whether a blip or indicative of a new normal, scientists have uniformly expressed disbelief at the current Arctic temperatures and the state of the sea ice. “This is a crazy winter,” said Alek Petty, a climate scientist at NASA, in an interview. “I don’t think we’re sensationalizing it.” “It’s never been this extreme,” Ruth Mottram, a climate scientist at the Danish Meteorological Institute, told Reuters. 11/19/19 72 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Appendix B – Harmful effects of Methane – the primary component of natural gas The above picture shows the massive natural gas release that occurred at Portal Ranch in Southern California in 2015. The release poisoned the air causing evacuation in the region. Natural gas is primarily methane – CH4. Methane is a very potent greenhouse gas. It is 100 times more potent a warming chemical than CO2. CH4 decays in the atmosphere and br eaks down into CO2 and water vapor. There are many business and government interests in promoting natural gas as a “bridge fuel”. Because combustion of natural gas produces about twice the heat as coal combustion for the same amount of CO2 emissions, it is often promoted as a superior fuel to coal. However, because there is substantial leakage of CH4 into the atmosphere in the acquisition, storage, and transportation, the continued use of natural gas poses a substantial climate risk. There are powerful commercial and political proponents of this dangerous fuel. Qatar recently announced that they were going to process natural gas. According to the Guardian 7 Jim Hansen (see Appendix H) has written to the Government of UK, “’If the UK were to join the US by developing gas fields at this point in time it will lock in the methane problem for decades,’ he wrote, adding that fracking would fatally undermine the UK’s attempt to fulfil its climate obligations.’” At a recent symposium at Stanford University Douglas K immelman8 spoke 7 October 13, 2018, “Top climate scientist blast UK’s fracking plans as ‘aping Trump’ 8 October 29, 2018 “Douglas Kimmelman: Inconvenient Truths about Energy (Energy Seminar), video link available: https://energy.stanford.edu/events/energy-seminar-douglas-kimmelman-inconvenient-truths-about-energy 11/19/19 73 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. about his plans as founder of Energy Capital Partners to promote natural gas in the United States. He foresees great financial gain in liquefying it and shipping all over the world. I fear that any policy that enables the expansion of na tural gas is deeply flawed. The following graph is from the 5th IPCC Assessment. In the graph you can see the significant contribution to radiative forcing that methane is causing – it is 16% of the total warming from greenhouse gases. It is only second to CO2. However, if mankind can substantially reduce its emissions of methane, then its contribution to climate forcing will diminish relatively quickly. There is not a solid consensus within the scientific community about what fraction of methane does escape, and what timeframe should be used to determine its global warming potential. However, there are many climate scientists who believe natural gas power may be comparable to coal power because of this leakage. This is from the Union of Concerned Scientists (my underlining):9 Whether natural gas has lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions than coal and oil depends on the assumed leakage rate, the global warming potential of methane over different time frames, the energy conversion efficiency, and other factors [5]. One recent study found that methane losses must be kept below 3.2 percent for natural gas power plants to have lower life cycle emissions than new coal plants over short time frames of 20 years or fewer [6]. And if burning natural gas in vehicles is to deliver even marginal benefits, methan e losses must be kept below 1 percent and 1.6 percent compared with diesel fuel and gasoline, respectively. Technologies are available to reduce much of the leaking methane, but deploying such technology would require new policies and investments [7]. 9 December 18, 2018 https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/coal-and-other-fossil-fuels/environmental-impacts-of- natural-gas#.XBmI3KeZPKY 11/19/19 74 of 237 Personal Comments of Sustainability Commissioner Gary Latshaw, Ph.D. Measurements of natural gas emissions over the entire operation in the US are estimated to be 2.4% of production10. However, this figure comes from a disparate set of measurements – some of which resulted in 9% leakage. On top of everything, the Trump administration has eliminated many of the restrictions that the previous administration placed on the petroleum industry. Since the future is impossible to predict, the most certain constraint is to directly restrict the use of fossil fuel energy. 10 Methane leaks erode green credentials of natural gas , by Jeff Tollefson, Nature, Vol. 493, 3 January 2013 11/19/19 75 of 237 11/19/19 76 of 237 11/19/19 77 of 237 cc 08-06-19 #1 Youth Climate Action Team Written Communications 11/19/19 78 of 237 To the City of Cupertino: Cities throughout the world must use their authority to promptly eliminate the emissions of greenhouse gases. The City of Cupertino along with dozens ofother cities across the Bay Area recently declared a Climate Emergency, signifying an effort to end greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible and transition to a city economy that is ecologically sustainable. The most recent international scientific assessment -the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change October 2018)-states that future generations will need to remove excessive carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in order to stabilize the planet's physical and ecological systems to support our larger human population. The National Snow and Ice Center calculates that the 2019 Arctic summer ice coverage will rank as the smallest or second smallest on record. The shrinking and possible complete disintegration of the summer ice coverage will trigger a cascade of dangerous global events. Massive amounts of methan_e will be released, ocean circulation patterns will be disrupted, possibly change weather patterns throughout the world, and the melting of Greenland ice will accelerate. Surface ice sheets the size of small states will slide into the ocean and causing tens of feet of sea level rise throughout the world. The various mechanisms to sustain life in parts of the planet are already in jeopardy. While national governments throughout the world have a major role to play in avoiding further deterioration of the planet, local governments, cities in particular, also have a critical role to play. It is the duty of cities and other local governments to accomplish this goal within the jurisdictions that they oversee: building codes, infrastructure, local energy policy, the processing of waste etc. Building Codes for New Construction o New construction should have better insulation, rooftop solar panels, and efficient appliances o Reach codes - codes that address energy consumption -should encourage electrification over the use of natural gas o EV Chargers-New construction can have EV-ready (minimum) wiring and installed EV stations o Banning natural gas using other legal mechanism should be incorporated into each city's legal structure, following the lead ofthe City ofBerkeley Processing Waste o Require re-useable utensils in restaurants, and the composting of food waste and landscaping trash Zero Emission Municipal Activities o All municipal vehicles should become Zero-Emission-Vehicles by 2030 o All municipal buildings should become electrified and zero-emitting facilities by 2030 Infrastructure o Improved and expanded bike and pedestrian trails, roadside, and parking facilities o Public EV Chargers -near government buildings 11/19/19 79 of 237 Our youth and their children will bear the burden of our appalling neglect. Sincerely, Gary Latshaw Chair, Bay Area for Clean Environment 11/19/19 80 of 237 Public comment on behalf of Ro Khanna at the Cupertino City Council Meeting on August 6. f~{a_f?o',,, tc <;?/f>/tJ 1#= ( Thank you Mayor and City Council Members. My name is Linda Sell and I am working with Congressman Ro Khanna on local education and environmental initiatives. I am making a public comment on behalf of Ro Khanna. Here is his statement: I am honored and lucky to represent Cupertino and the surrounding Silicon Valley cities. I am proud of the youth and the environmental groups who have gathered here to discuss climate solutions today. Please consider their input, because their input and your work at the city level is important to our future. Cities need to take drastic action and lead the way in transitioning us to a carbon-free and renewable energy future. When cities lead, Congress will follow. I am also working on climate solutions, and your support of building electrification, EV readiness, and fossil fuel divestment will help build support for proactive environmental policy we are working to push through Congress. With that, I'd like to ask you follow the lead of the youth gathered here and prioritize the 4 environmental initiatives presented to you tonight. I believe that working on clean energy and green technology is about engaging our 21st century economy, especially here in the heart of Silicon Valley. China is responsible for 50% percent of the electric vehicle market today. We, in contrast, have about one percent. China will reach 40% percent renewable energy by 2025, while we are predicted to reach only 18%. Addressing climate change is not just about the survival of our planet, climate change is not just about preventing devastating disasters, but whoever wins the clean energy race, whoever creates new technologies, is going to lead the 21st century when it comes to our economic future. Surely you can agree the US should lead the world in 21st century technology and energy. Our state is the most successful economy in the US, and we are leading in showing a solar, wind and renewable energy future is good economics. It is my hope in my work to make this case for the economic vision of clean technology policy. I look forward to having the Bay Area, our vision and your work be a model for the country when it comes to a clean, green energy future. 11/19/19 81 of 237 11/19/19 82 of 237 CUPERTINO REACH CODE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Single-Family/Duplex (including detached ADUs) • All-Electric Required—(includes Heating/Cooling, Water Heater, Clothes Dryer, Cooking Appliances, Fireplace and Fire Pit) High rise Multi-Family (4+ stories), Mixed-Use, Hotel/Motel • All-Electric Required —(includes Heating/Cooling, Water Heater, Clothes Dryer, Cooking Appliances, Fireplace and Fire Pit) • For-Profit Kitchen applicants may appeal to use natural gas for cooking equipment, if listed electrical equivalent alternative is not available. (This language is draft; final language to address Council- approved revision TBD) —Prewiring is required for future use of electric appliances where natural gas installed Commercial (Office, retail) • all Electric—Heating/Cooling, Water Heater, Clothes Dryer, and Cooking Appliances • Natural Gas Allowed in no cases. • For-Profit Kitchen applicants may appeal to use natural gas for cooking equipment, if listed electrical equivalent alternative is not available. (This language is draft; final language to address Council- approved revision TBD) —Prewiring is required for future use of electric appliances where natural gas installed 11/19/19 83 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Certificates of Appreciation to the Cupertino Citizen Corps for their assistance with the recent Public Safety Power Shutdown (PSPS) Present Certificates of Appreciation to the Cupertino Citizen Corps for their assistance with the recent Public Safety Power Shutdown (PSPS) File #:19-6339,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 84 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Certificates of Appreciation to volunteers at the Silicon Valley Korean School (SVKS) Present Certificates of Appreciation to volunteers at the Silicon Valley Korean School (SVKS) File #:19-6257,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 85 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Proclamation for Lung Cancer Awareness Month Present proclamation for Lung Cancer Awareness Month File #:19-6484,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 86 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Presentation by Cupertino-Copertino, Italy Sister City Committee adult delegation regarding recent trip Receive presentation by Cupertino-Copertino, Italy Sister City Committee adult delegation regarding recent trip File #:19-6286,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 87 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Presentation by Judy Miner, Chancellor of Foothill-De Anza Community College on the planning process for the facility that will replace De Anza's Flint Center Receive Presentation by Judy Miner, Chancellor of Foothill-De Anza Community College on the planning process for the facility that will replace De Anza's Flint Center File #:19-5805,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 88 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Continue Item No. 15 Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments to a future meeting date and item will be renoticed. These topics will be discussed in the study session. Continue Item No. 15 Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments to a future meeting date. File #:19-6525,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 89 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Report on Committee assignments Report on Committee assignments File #:19-5172,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 90 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Annual adoption of Other Post-Employment Benefits (“OPEB”) Trust Investment Policy. Adopt Resolution No. 19-135 accepting the City Investment Policy for the OPEB Trust. File #:19-6481,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 91 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Annual adoption of Pension Trust Investment Policy. Adopt Resolution No. 19-136 accepting the City Investment Policy for the Pension Trust. File #:19-6482,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 92 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject:Treasurer’s Investment Report for period ending September 30, 2019 Accept staff report and provide recommendations. File #:19-6483,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 93 of 237 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 800.317.4747 | www.chandlerasset.com INVESTMENT REPORT Period Ending September 30, 2019 City of Cupertino 11/19/19 94 of 237 SECTION 1 Economic Update SECTION 2 Account Profile SECTION 3 Portfolio Holdings SECTION 4 Transactions Table of Contents As of September 30, 2019 1 11/19/19 95 of 237 SECTION |Section 1 |Economic Update 2 11/19/19 96 of 237 The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered the target fed funds rate by 25 basis points in September (for the second time this year)to a range of 1.75%-2.00%. There were three dissenting votes; one policymaker favored a 50-basis point rate cut, and two policymakers favored leaving the fed funds rate unchanged. According to the Fed's dot plot, only seven out of 17 policymakers are anticipating another rate cut before year-end. Although there is a growing disparity among policymakers about the appropriate path of monetary policy, Fed Chair Powell’s press conference suggested the Fed will be flexible and datadependent. Powell indicated more rate cuts may be appropriate if the economy slows further,but the Fed is not on apreset course.We continue to believe the Federal Reserve is likely to cutthe fed funds targetrate again before year-end,in the absence of atrade resolution or meaningful improvement in market-based measures of inflation. The next Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is scheduled for October 29-30. Economic Update ▪ ▪ ▪The Treasury yield curve steepened modestly in September, although the curve remains partially inverted. The 3-month T- bill yield declined nearly 17 basis points to 1.81%, the 2-year Treasury yield increased nearly twelve basis points to 1.62%, and the 10-yearTreasury yield increased about 17 basis points to 1.67%.An inversion of the yield curve in which the 10-year Treasury yield is lower than the 3-month T-bill yield is generally viewed as a powerful predictive signal of an upcoming recession. However,we believe increased short-term Treasury issuance to fund the deficit, and negative sovereign bond yields in othercountries may be distorting the US Treasury yield curve. German sovereign bond yields (from 1-month out to 30-years) remained negative at September month-end. Source: Bloomberg Labor market and consumer fundamentals remain favorable,but manufacturing data continues to disappoint.We believe economic growth has slowed from earlier this year and downside risks to the outlook remain elevated.The US economy continues to face headwinds from trade disputes,slowing global economic growth,and an uncertain outlook for Brexit. However,we believe accommodativeUS monetary policy and a collective dovish stance by all of the major global central banks should help to combat headwinds.We also believe the Trump administration faces significant political pressure to make progress toward a trade agreement with China as we head into an election year. 3 11/19/19 97 of 237 U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose by 136,000 in September, slightly below expectations of 145,000. However, August payrolls were revised higher by 38,000.On a trailing 3-month and 6-month average basis, payrolls increased an average of about 157,000 and 154,000per month, respectively. The unemployment rate declined to 3.5% (the lowest rate since December 1969)from 3.7%in August, and the participation rate held steady at 63.2%. A broadermeasure of unemployment called the U-6, which includes those who are marginally attached to the laborforce and employed part time for economicreasons, dropped to 6.9%in Septemberfrom 7.2%in August. Wages were flat in September, missing expectations fora 0.3% increase, and the average workweek was unchanged.On a year-over-year basis, wages were up 2.9%in September, versus up 3.2%in August. Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 MOM Change In (000's)Nonfarm Payroll (000's) Non-farm Payroll (000's) 3 month average (000's) 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% Unemployment Rate Underemployment Rate (U6) Unemployment Rate (U3)Rate (%)Employment 4 11/19/19 98 of 237 The ConsumerPrice Index (CPI) was up 1.7% year-over-year in September, unchanged from August. Core CPI (CPI less food and energy) was up 2.4% year-over-year in September, also unchanged from August. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index was up 1.4% year-over- year in August, unchanged from July. Core PCE, which is the Fed's primary inflation gauge, was up 1.8% year-over-year in August versus 1.7% year-over-year in July. Core PCE remains below the Fed’s 2.0% inflation target. Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Consumer Price Index (CPI) CPI YOY % Change Core CPI YOY % ChangeYOY( %) Change0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change PCE Core Deflator YOY % ChangeYOY( %) ChangeInflation 5 11/19/19 99 of 237 Retail sales in August were moderately above consensus expectations, coming in at 0.4% compared to the 0.2% estimate. Excluding auto and gas, retail sales were up 0.1% compared to expectations fora0.2% increase.On ayear-over-year basis, retail sales increased by 4.1%, amodest increase from the prior year-over-year number of 3.6%. The Consumer Confidence Index unexpectedly declined to 125.1 in September from 134.2 in August. Nevertheless, the index remains at a strong level. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% Retail Sales YOY % Change YOY (%) Change110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 Index LevelConsumer Confidence Consumer 6 11/19/19 100 of 237 The Leading EconomicIndex (LEI) was flat in August,in line with expectations, following a0.4% increase in July. While the LEI remains higher on a year-over-year basis (up 1.1%in August) the pace of year-over-year improvement continues to decline, and the index suggests broad economic growth will continue to slow. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) increased to 0.10 in August from -0.41 in July.On a 3- month moving average basis, the index improved to -0.06 in August versus -0.14 in July. Negative values are generally consistent with below- average growth. However, periods of economic contraction have historically been associated with values below -0.70 on a 3-month moving average basis. -0.4% -0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)MOM ( %) Change-0.70 -0.50 -0.30 -0.10 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.70 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)3 Month AverageSource: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Activity 7 11/19/19 101 of 237 Housing starts were much strongerthan expected in August,up 12.3% month-over-month to a 1.364million annualized rate. Multi-family starts jumped 32.8% month-over-month to an annualized rate of 445,000, while single-family starts rose 4.4%to an annualized rate of 919,000.On a year-over-year basis, total housing starts were up 6.6%in August. Permits were also stronger than expected in the month. Although housing data tends to be volatile on a month-over-month basis, the August report and three-month moving averages suggest that housing activity is accelerating. According to the Case-Shiller 20-City home price index, home prices were up just 2.0% year-over-year in July, versus up 2.2%in June. The year-over-year pace of price appreciation is at a 7-year low. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MOM Change (In Thousands of Units)Housing Starts Multi Family Housing Starts Single Family Housing Starts 1.5% 2.5% 3.5% 4.5% 5.5% 6.5% 7.5% S&P/Case -Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index YOY( %) ChangeHousing 8 11/19/19 102 of 237 The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index declined to 47.8 in September from 49.1 in August. The reading was worse than expected and suggests the manufacturing sector remains in contraction. New orders and backlog orders also remained below 50.0 in September. Overall, the ISM Manufacturing report suggests the outlook for the manufacturing sector is weak. The Industrial Production index was up 0.4% year-over-year in August versus up 0.5% year-over-year in July.On a month-over-month basis, the index rose 0.6%in August, above the consensus forecast of 0.2%. The manufacturing component of the index rose 0.5%in August, above the 0.1% consensus, following a 0.4% decline in July. Capacity Utilization increased to 77.9%in August from 77.5%in July,but remains below the long-run average of 79.8% indicating there is still excess capacity for growth. Source: Institute for Supply Management Source: Federal Reserve 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 Institute of Supply Management Purchasing Manager Index EXPANDING CONTRACTING 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Industrial Production YOY( %) ChangeManufacturing 9 11/19/19 103 of 237 Second quarter GDP grew at an annualized rate of 2.0% following growth of 3.1%in the first quarter. Although the overall pace of GDP growth slowed in the second quarter (as expected), personal consumption expenditures accelerated and were up 4.6% in Q2, following sluggish growth of just 1.1%in Q1. Personal consumption expenditures contributed 3.00 percentage points to Q2 GDP, federal government spending contributed 0.53 percentage points, and state & local government spending contributed 0.29 percentage points. Meanwhile, gross private domestic investment and net exports were a drag on Q2 GDP growth. The consensus forecast calls for GDP growth of 1.9%in the third quarter and 1.7% in the fourth quarter, for full year growth of about 2.0-2.5% versus 2.9% growth in 2018. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce 9/18 12/18 3/19 6/19 2.3% 1.0% 0.8% 3.0% 2.3% 0.5% 1.1% -1.2% -2.1% -0.4% 0.7% -0.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5% 0.2% -0.1% 0.4% 0.3% 2.9% 1.1% 3.1% 2.0% Total Components of GDP Net Exports and Imports Personal Consumption Expenditures Gross Private Domestic Investment Federal Government Expenditures State and Local (Consumption and Gross Investment) 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Gross Domestic Product (GDP) GDP QOQ % Change GDP YOY % Change Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 10 11/19/19 104 of 237 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000 4,000,000 4,100,000 4,200,000 4,300,000 4,400,000 4,500,000 Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets In$ millions0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% Long Run Federal Funds Rates FOMC DOTS Median of the Longer Run Projections Effective Federal Funds Rate Yield (%)Federal Reserve Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg Fed policymakers have signaled they are prepared to act as appropriate to incoming data in order to sustain the economicexpansion. The FOMC has cutthe fed funds rate by 25 basis points twice this year to arange of 1.75-2.00%. The Fed concluded its balance sheet normalization program in August. However, the Federal Reserve will soon increase its purchases of short-term Treasury securities in order to provide sufficient liquidity to the banking system and money markets. Fed ChairPowell has emphasized thatthe purchases will be aimed at controlling the level of short-term lending rates but will not be aform of quantitative easing or stimulus. More details will be announced at the next FOMC meeting at the end of October. 11 11/19/19 105 of 237 Source: Bloomberg The shape of the Treasury yield curve has changed significantly on a year-over-yearbasis.As of Septembermonth-end, the 3-month T-bill yield was down 39 basis points, the 2-YearTreasury yield was down nearly 120 basis points, and the 10-YearTreasury yield was down nearly 140 basis points, year-over-year. The current shape of the yield curve implies that market participants are pricing-in additional rate cuts.We believe the year-over-year decline in long-term Treasury yields reflects a high level of market participants' nervousness about the outlook for global economic growth and a decline in global inflation expectations. Source: Bloomberg 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% US Treasury Note Yields 2-Year 5-Year 10-YearYield (%)0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% US Treasury Yield Curve Sep-19 Jun-19 Sep-18Yield (%)Bond Yields 12 11/19/19 106 of 237 Section 2|SECTION |Section 2 |Account Profile 13 11/19/19 107 of 237 Objectives Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective The performance objective for the portfolio is to earn a total rate of return through a market cycle that is equal to or above the return on the benchmark index. Investment Objectives The City of Cupertino’s investment objectives,in order of priority,are to provide safety to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio,provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and a market rate of return consistent with the investment program. Strategy In order to achieve these objectives,the portfolio invests in high quality fixed incomes securities consistent with the investment policy and California Government Code. As of September 30, 2019 14 11/19/19 108 of 237 Compliance As of September 30, 2019 Category Standard Comment Treasury Issues No Limitation Complies Agency Issues 25% per Agency/GSE issuer; 20% max agency callable securities; Issued by Federal Agencies or U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise obligations.Complies Supranational "AA" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 10% max per issuer; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by IBRD, IFC, or IADB.Complies Municipal Securities "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Obligations of the City, State of California, and any local agency within the State of California; Obligations of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states in addition to California. Complies Corporate Medium Term Notes "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S.Complies Asset Backed/ Mortgage Backed/ Collateralized Mortgage Obligation "AA" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 20% maximum; 5% max per issuer on Asset-Backed or Commercial Mortgage security; There is no issuer limitation on any Mortgage security where the issuer is the U.S. Treasury or a Federal Agency/GSE .Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCDs) No rating required if amount of the NCD is insured up to the FDIC limit; If above FDIC insured limit, requires "A-1" short-term rated or "A" long-term rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by nationally or state chartered banks, state or federal savings associations, or state or federal credit unions, or by a federally licensed or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Complies Certificates of Deposit (CDs)/Time Deposit (TDs) 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Certificates of Deposit, Time Deposit, non-negotiable, and collateralized in accordance with California Government Code.Complies Banker’s Acceptances "A-1" short-term rated or better by a NRSRO; or "A" long-term rating category or better by a NRSRO; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 180 days max maturity Complies Commercial Paper "A-1" short term rated or better a NRSRO; "A" long-term issuer rating category or better by a NRSRO; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 270 days max maturity; Issued by corporations organized and operating in the U.S. with assets > $500 million; 10% max outstanding paper of the issuing corporation. Complies Money Market Funds 20% maximum; Daily money market funds administered for or by trustees, paying agents and custodian banks contracted by a City of Cupertino as allowed under California Government Code; Only funds holding U.S. Treasury obligations, Government agency obligations or repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Government agency obligations can be utilized. Complies City of Cupertino Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy. 15 11/19/19 109 of 237 Compliance As of September 30, 2019 Category Standard Comment Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)Maximum amount permitted by LAIF; Not used by investment adviser Complies Repurchase Agreements 1 year max maturity; 102% collateralized; A PSA Master Repurchase Agreement is required between City of Cupertino and the broke/dealer or financial institution for all repurchase agreements; Not used by investment adviser Complies Prohibited Securities Reverse Repurchase Agreement; Common stocks; Long-term (> 5 years maturity) notes and bonds; Special circumstances arise that necessitate purchase of securities beyond the 5-year limitation. On such occasions, request must be approved by City Council prior to purchase; Futures/Options; Inverse floaters; Ranges notes, Mortgage-derived, Interest-only strips; Zero interest accrual securities; Purchasing/selling securities on margin; Foreign currency denominated securities. Complies Minimum Budgeted Operating Expenditures in Short Term Investments Minimum 6 months of budgeted operating expenditures in short term investments to provide sufficient liquidity for expected disbursements Complies Max Per Issuer 5% per issuer, unless otherwise specified in the policy Complies Maximum maturity 5 years Complies City of Cupertino Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy. 16 11/19/19 110 of 237 Portfolio Characteristics City of Cupertino 9/30/2019 6/30/2019 Benchmark*Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)2.66 2.62 2.24 Average Modified Duration 2.54 2.32 2.09 Average Purchase Yield n/a 1.94%2.01% Average Market Yield 1.65%1.84%2.10% Average Quality**AAA AA/Aa1 AA/Aa1 Total Market Value 105,780,960 68,116,368 *ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index **Benchmark is a blended rating of S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively. As of September 30, 2019 17 11/19/19 111 of 237 City of Cupertino Sector Distribution Agency 31.3% Money Market Fund FI 9.0% Negotiable CD 5.8% US Corporate 20.2% US Treasury 22.1% ABS 6.8% CMO 2.0% Foreign Corporate 3.0% September 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 Agency 46.2% Money Market Fund FI 0.3% Negotiable CD 8.9% US Corporate 25.6% US Treasury 19.1% As of September 30, 2019 18 11/19/19 112 of 237 Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio Government of United States US Treasury 22.08% Federal Home Loan Bank Agency 13.15% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency 10.47% Wells Fargo 100% Treasury MMKT Fund Money Market Fund FI 8.96% Federal National Mortgage Association Agency 5.76% Honda ABS ABS 1.99% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp CMO 1.98% Nordea Bank ABP New York Negotiable CD 1.92% Toronto Dominion Holdings Negotiable CD 1.92% Bank of Nova Scotia Houston Negotiable CD 1.92% John Deere ABS ABS 1.92% Federal Farm Credit Bank Agency 1.90% Air Products & Chemicals US Corporate 1.68% HSBC Holdings PLC Foreign Corporate 1.50% Toronto Dominion Holdings Foreign Corporate 1.46% Charles Schwab Corp/The US Corporate 1.45% Nissan ABS ABS 1.44% Toyota ABS ABS 1.44% IBM Corp US Corporate 1.43% Honda Motor Corporation US Corporate 1.32% Bank of America Corp US Corporate 1.28% JP Morgan Chase & Co US Corporate 1.26% Wells Fargo Corp US Corporate 1.25% PNC Financial Services Group US Corporate 1.15% Bank of New York US Corporate 1.00% Wal-Mart Stores US Corporate 1.00% Deere & Company US Corporate 0.97% General Dynamics Corp US Corporate 0.97% Apple Inc US Corporate 0.97% Toyota Motor Corp US Corporate 0.97% State Street Bank US Corporate 0.95% Oracle Corp US Corporate 0.95% Chubb Corporation US Corporate 0.81% Paccar Financial US Corporate 0.78% TOTAL 100.00% Issuers City of Cupertino –Account #10659 As of September 30, 2019 19 11/19/19 113 of 237 AAA AA A <A NR 09/30/19 16.1%55.4%20.2%0.0%8.3% 06/30/19 6.2%69.9%19.6%0.0%4.4% Source: S&P Ratings September 30, 2019 vs. June 30, 2019 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% AAA AA A <A NR 9/30/2019 6/30/2019 Quality Distribution City of Cupertino As of September 30, 2019 20 11/19/19 114 of 237 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ City of Cupertino ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Portfolio Compared to the Benchmark as of September 30, 2019 0 -0.25 0.25 -0.50 0.50 -1 1 -2 2 -3 3 -4 4 -5 5+ Portfolio 18.9% 1.9% 5.5% 14.9% 17.8% 22.2% 18.7% 0.0% Benchmark*0.3% 0.1% 1.8% 34.4% 27.2% 22.4% 13.9% 0.0% *ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Duration Distribution City of Cupertino As of September 30, 2019 21 11/19/19 115 of 237 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 3 months Since Inception City of Cupertino ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Total Rate of Return Since Inception 01/31/2019 TOTAL RATE OF RETURN Latest 3 months Since Inception City of Cupertino 1.00%2.97% ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index 0.75%3.48% Investment Performance City of Cupertino Total rate of return:A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time.It is the internal rate of return,which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value;it includes interest earnings,realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio. As of September 30, 2019 22 11/19/19 116 of 237 Purchase Yield as of 9/30/2019 = 1.94% 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Percent (%)Historical Average Purchase Yield City of Cupertino As of September 30, 2019 23 11/19/19 117 of 237 SECTION |Section 3 |Portfolio Holdings 24 11/19/19 118 of 237 Holdings Report City of Cupertino -Account #10659 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration ABS 43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 2.950% Due 08/22/2022 1,600,000.00 09/16/2019 1.45% 1,616,875.00 1,616,669.78 101.16 1.99% 1,618,500.78 1,311.11 1.53% 1,831.00 Aaa / NR AAA 2.90 1.18 89238TAD5 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 2.960% Due 09/15/2022 1,500,000.00 09/10/2019 1.15% 1,517,519.53 1,517,216.64 101.14 1.97% 1,517,112.00 1,973.33 1.44% (104.64) Aaa / AAA NR 2.96 1.12 65479GAD1 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 3.060% Due 03/15/2023 1,500,000.00 09/16/2019 1.37% 1,521,210.93 1,520,994.49 101.45 2.08% 1,521,688.50 2,040.00 1.44% 694.01 Aaa / AAA NR 3.46 1.44 47789JAD8 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A3 2.910% Due 07/17/2023 1,000,000.00 08/27/2019 1.87% 1,020,820.31 1,020,335.78 101.79 1.93% 1,017,877.00 1,293.33 0.96% (2,458.78) Aaa / NR AAA 3.80 1.78 43815NAC8 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3 1.780% Due 08/15/2023 490,000.00 08/20/2019 1.79% 489,995.93 489,996.06 99.79 1.88% 488,963.16 387.64 0.46% (1,032.90) Aaa / AAA NR 3.88 2.34 477870AC3 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3 2.210% Due 12/15/2023 1,000,000.00 08/27/2019 1.79% 1,009,257.81 1,009,063.10 100.66 1.93% 1,006,583.00 982.22 0.95% (2,480.10) Aaa / NR AAA 4.21 2.23 TOTAL ABS 7,090,000.00 1.50% 7,175,679.51 7,174,275.85 1.98% 7,170,724.44 7,987.63 6.79% (3,551.41) Aaa / AAA Aaa 3.41 1.53 Agency 313378UP4 FHLB Note 2.000% Due 10/11/2019 1,500,000.00 06/22/2017 1.43% 1,519,380.00 1,500,230.44 100.00 1.84% 1,500,064.50 14,166.67 1.43% (165.94) Aaa / AA+ NR 0.03 0.03 3133EGJ30 FFCB Note 1.100% Due 11/18/2019 2,000,000.00 11/23/2016 1.36% 1,984,760.00 1,999,328.88 99.90 1.86% 1,997,952.00 8,127.78 1.90% (1,376.88) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.13 0.13 3134G8S83 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 3/30/2017 1.500% Due 12/30/2019 2,000,000.00 03/30/2016 1.50% 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 99.90 1.90% 1,998,012.00 83.33 1.89% (1,988.00) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.25 0.25 3134G9G43 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 12/30/2016 1.020% Due 12/30/2019 3,000,000.00 06/30/2016 1.02% 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 99.78 1.89% 2,993,439.00 7,735.00 2.84% (6,561.00) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.25 0.25 3134G9MW4 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 5/26/2017 1.350% Due 05/26/2020 975,000.00 05/31/2016 1.35% 975,000.00 975,000.00 99.64 1.91% 971,455.88 4,570.31 0.92% (3,544.12) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.65 0.65 3134G9SK4 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 6/30/2017 1.500% Due 06/30/2020 2,000,000.00 06/30/2016 1.50% 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 99.73 1.87% 1,994,522.00 7,583.33 1.89% (5,478.00) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.75 0.74 3136G3QQ1 FNMA Callable Note 1X 5/25/2017 1.500% Due 11/25/2020 3,000,000.00 05/25/2016 1.50% 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 99.63 1.82% 2,988,966.00 15,750.00 2.84% (11,034.00) NR / NR AAA 1.16 1.13 313378JP7 FHLB Note 2.375% Due 09/10/2021 2,000,000.00 09/06/2019 1.57% 2,031,540.00 2,030,592.08 101.36 1.66% 2,027,130.00 2,770.83 1.92% (3,462.08) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.95 1.89 313376C94 FHLB Note 2.625% Due 12/10/2021 1,325,000.00 01/19/2017 1.90% 1,369,559.75 1,344,984.52 102.07 1.66% 1,352,481.83 10,724.22 1.29% 7,497.31 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.20 2.11 As of September 30, 2019 25 11/19/19 119 of 237 Holdings Report City of Cupertino -Account #10659 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 3137EADB2 FHLMC Note 2.375% Due 01/13/2022 1,500,000.00 06/21/2019 1.84% 1,520,100.00 1,517,969.49 101.54 1.69% 1,523,097.00 7,718.75 1.45% 5,127.51 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.29 2.21 3137EAEN5 FHLMC Note 2.750% Due 06/19/2023 1,500,000.00 06/21/2019 1.83% 1,553,100.00 1,549,489.49 104.04 1.63% 1,560,642.00 11,687.50 1.49% 11,152.51 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.72 3.51 3130A3DL5 FHLB Note 2.375% Due 09/08/2023 2,000,000.00 09/06/2019 1.52% 2,066,320.00 2,065,320.66 102.89 1.62% 2,057,700.00 3,034.72 1.95% (7,620.66) Aaa / AA+ NR 3.94 3.75 3135G0U43 FNMA Note 2.875% Due 09/12/2023 1,500,000.00 06/21/2019 1.89% 1,559,805.00 1,555,962.89 104.80 1.62% 1,571,991.00 2,276.04 1.49% 16,028.11 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.95 3.73 3130A0F70 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 12/08/2023 1,500,000.00 04/29/2019 2.36% 1,565,940.00 1,559,906.27 106.99 1.64% 1,604,884.50 15,890.63 1.53% 44,978.23 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.19 3.88 3130A0XE5 FHLB Note 3.250% Due 03/08/2024 1,500,000.00 03/28/2019 2.27% 1,568,115.00 1,561,099.83 107.14 1.58% 1,607,058.00 3,114.58 1.52% 45,958.17 Aaa / AA+ NR 4.44 4.14 3130A1XJ2 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 06/14/2024 1,500,000.00 06/18/2019 1.96% 1,564,890.20 1,561,186.26 105.58 1.64% 1,583,730.00 12,817.70 1.51% 22,543.74 Aaa / AA+ NR 4.71 4.37 3135G0V75 FNMA Note 1.750% Due 07/02/2024 1,500,000.00 07/16/2019 1.96% 1,484,895.00 1,485,528.54 100.57 1.62% 1,508,553.00 6,052.08 1.43% 23,024.46 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.76 4.53 3130A2UW4 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 09/13/2024 2,000,000.00 09/13/2019 1.79% 2,103,380.00 2,102,529.84 105.72 1.67% 2,114,422.00 2,875.00 2.00% 11,892.16 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.96 4.62 TOTAL Agency 32,300,000.00 1.65% 32,866,784.95 32,809,129.19 1.74% 32,956,100.71 136,978.47 31.28% 146,971.52 Aaa / AA+ Aaa 2.33 2.20 CMO 3137B4WB8 FHLMC K033 A2 3.060% Due 07/25/2023 1,000,000.00 08/13/2019 1.18% 1,037,656.25 1,036,452.51 103.64 1.98% 1,036,401.99 510.00 0.98% (50.52) Aaa / NR NR 3.82 3.46 3137B7MZ9 FHLMC K036 A2 3.527% Due 10/25/2023 1,000,000.00 08/19/2019 1.92% 1,061,914.06 1,060,290.08 105.58 2.05% 1,055,785.00 587.83 1.00% (4,505.08) Aaa / NR AAA 4.07 3.65 TOTAL CMO 2,000,000.00 1.55% 2,099,570.31 2,096,742.59 2.02% 2,092,186.99 1,097.83 1.98% (4,555.60) Aaa / NR Aaa 3.95 3.56 Foreign Corporate 404280BS7 HSBC Holdings PLC Callable Note 1X 5/18/2023 3.950% Due 05/18/2024 1,500,000.00 Various 2.51% 1,572,790.00 1,572,150.41 104.66 2.55% 1,569,826.50 21,889.59 1.50% (2,323.91) A2 / A AA- 4.64 3.56 As of September 30, 2019 26 11/19/19 120 of 237 Holdings Report City of Cupertino -Account #10659 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 89114QCA4 Toronto Dominion Bank Note 2.650% Due 06/12/2024 1,500,000.00 09/11/2019 2.24% 1,527,255.00 1,526,972.08 101.89 2.22% 1,528,276.50 12,035.42 1.46% 1,304.42 Aa3 / A NR 4.70 4.37 TOTAL Foreign Corporate 3,000,000.00 2.38% 3,100,045.00 3,099,122.49 2.39% 3,098,103.00 33,925.01 2.96% (1,019.49) A1 / A AA- 4.67 3.96 Money Market Fund FI 94975H270 Wells Fargo 100% Treasury Money Mkt Fund 9,475,707.12 Various 1.54% 9,475,707.12 9,475,707.12 1.00 1.54% 9,475,707.12 0.00 8.96% 0.00 Aaa / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Money Market Fund FI 9,475,707.12 1.54% 9,475,707.12 9,475,707.12 1.54% 9,475,707.12 0.00 8.96% 0.00 Aaa / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 Negotiable CD 06417G5Q7 Bank of Nova Scotia Yankee CD 2.610% Due 12/23/2019 2,000,000.00 04/04/2019 2.57% 2,000,538.93 2,000,170.08 100.01 2.57% 2,000,170.08 27,985.00 1.92% 0.00 P-1 / A-1 F-1+ 0.23 0.23 65558TFW0 Nordea Bank ABP New York Yankee CD 2.640% Due 03/23/2020 2,000,000.00 03/21/2019 2.64% 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 100.00 2.64% 2,000,000.00 28,453.33 1.92% 0.00 P-1 / A-1+ F-1+ 0.48 0.47 89114MYP6 Toronto Dominion Bank Yankee CD 2.620% Due 04/02/2020 2,000,000.00 03/21/2019 2.62% 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 100.00 2.62% 2,000,000.00 28,237.78 1.92% 0.00 P-1 / A-1+ F-1+ 0.51 0.50 TOTAL Negotiable CD 6,000,000.00 2.61% 6,000,538.93 6,000,170.08 2.61% 6,000,170.08 84,676.11 5.75% 0.00 Aaa / AAA Aaa 0.41 0.40 US Corporate 00440EAT4 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 10/3/2020 2.300% Due 11/03/2020 850,000.00 03/05/2019 2.90% 841,840.00 844,636.18 100.32 1.97% 852,745.50 8,037.22 0.81% 8,109.32 A3 / A A 1.10 0.98 369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp Note 3.000% Due 05/11/2021 1,000,000.00 03/11/2019 2.76% 1,004,920.00 1,003,661.97 101.75 1.89% 1,017,511.00 11,666.67 0.97% 13,849.03 A2 / A+ NR 1.61 1.56 857477AV5 State Street Bank Note 1.950% Due 05/19/2021 1,000,000.00 Various 2.65% 986,055.00 988,941.53 100.01 1.94% 1,000,111.00 7,150.00 0.95% 11,169.47 A1 / A AA- 1.64 1.59 68389XBK0 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021 1.900% Due 09/15/2021 1,000,000.00 04/11/2019 2.66% 982,320.00 985,700.00 99.88 1.96% 998,821.00 844.44 0.95% 13,121.00 A1 / A+ A 1.96 1.91 89236TDP7 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note 2.600% Due 01/11/2022 1,000,000.00 03/05/2019 2.89% 992,200.00 993,758.50 101.58 1.89% 1,015,825.00 5,777.78 0.97% 22,066.50 Aa3 / AA- A+ 2.28 2.20 95000U2B8 Wells Fargo & Company Note 2.625% Due 07/22/2022 1,300,000.00 Various 2.68% 1,297,365.00 1,298,180.60 101.11 2.21% 1,314,432.60 6,540.63 1.25% 16,252.00 A2 / A- A+ 2.81 2.69 As of September 30, 2019 27 11/19/19 121 of 237 Holdings Report City of Cupertino -Account #10659 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 69353RFE3 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 6/28/2022 2.450% Due 07/28/2022 1,200,000.00 06/20/2019 2.16% 1,210,236.00 1,209,314.76 101.04 2.06% 1,212,480.00 5,145.00 1.15% 3,165.24 A2 / A A+ 2.83 2.63 44932HAC7 IBM Credit Corp Note 2.200% Due 09/08/2022 1,500,000.00 Various 2.88% 1,467,755.00 1,471,549.25 100.46 2.04% 1,506,901.50 2,108.34 1.43% 35,352.25 A2 / A NR 2.94 2.83 48128BAB7 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note 1X 1/15/2022 2.972% Due 01/15/2023 1,300,000.00 Various 2.92% 1,299,224.00 1,299,931.82 101.81 2.16% 1,323,519.60 8,156.49 1.26% 23,587.78 A2 / A- AA- 3.30 2.20 808513AT2 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 12/25/2022 2.650% Due 01/25/2023 1,500,000.00 Various 2.53% 1,504,955.00 1,505,409.30 101.80 2.07% 1,527,022.50 7,287.50 1.45% 21,613.20 A2 / A A 3.32 3.08 24422ETG4 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.800% Due 03/06/2023 1,000,000.00 03/28/2019 2.60% 1,007,580.00 1,006,599.55 102.84 1.94% 1,028,413.00 1,944.44 0.97% 21,813.45 A2 / A A 3.43 3.26 06406RAG2 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Note 3.500% Due 04/28/2023 1,000,000.00 03/05/2019 3.15% 1,013,650.00 1,011,773.46 104.76 2.11% 1,047,577.00 14,875.00 1.00% 35,803.54 A1 / A AA- 3.58 3.32 037833AK6 Apple Inc Note 2.400% Due 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 03/11/2019 2.79% 984,840.00 986,865.34 101.65 1.92% 1,016,469.00 9,866.67 0.97% 29,603.66 Aa1 / AA+ NR 3.59 3.40 931142EK5 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 5/26/2023 3.400% Due 06/26/2023 1,000,000.00 03/13/2019 2.80% 1,023,630.00 1,020,547.16 105.26 1.90% 1,052,646.00 8,972.22 1.00% 32,098.84 Aa2 / AA AA 3.74 3.41 69371RP59 Paccar Financial Corp Note 3.400% Due 08/09/2023 435,000.00 06/18/2019 2.56% 449,315.85 448,339.98 104.62 2.15% 455,076.12 2,136.33 0.43% 6,736.14 A1 / A+ NR 3.86 3.60 02665WCQ2 American Honda Finance Note 3.625% Due 10/10/2023 1,300,000.00 Various 2.76% 1,345,306.00 1,342,083.75 105.90 2.09% 1,376,675.30 22,384.38 1.32% 34,591.55 A2 / A NR 4.03 3.69 06051GHF9 Bank of America Corp Callable Note 1X 3/5/2023 3.550% Due 03/05/2024 1,300,000.00 Various 3.14% 1,315,499.00 1,314,896.85 103.93 2.35% 1,351,043.20 3,333.06 1.28% 36,146.35 A2 / A- A+ 4.43 3.22 009158AV8 Air Products & Chemicals Callable Note Cont 4/30/2024 3.350% Due 07/31/2024 1,675,000.00 08/07/2019 2.07% 1,771,212.00 1,768,257.63 105.48 2.09% 1,766,823.50 9,507.95 1.68% (1,434.13) A2 / A NR 4.84 4.23 69371RQ25 Paccar Financial Corp Note 2.150% Due 08/15/2024 370,000.00 08/08/2019 2.20% 369,182.30 369,203.34 99.98 2.16% 369,909.72 1,016.47 0.35% 706.38 A1 / A+ NR 4.88 4.59 TOTAL US Corporate 20,730,000.00 2.69% 20,867,085.15 20,869,650.97 2.05% 21,234,002.54 136,750.59 20.20% 364,351.57 A1 / A A+ 3.20 2.87 US Treasury 912828T34 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 09/30/2021 2,000,000.00 09/25/2019 1.71% 1,977,109.38 1,977,265.10 98.98 1.65% 1,979,532.00 61.48 1.87% 2,266.90 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.00 1.97 912828F96 US Treasury Note 2.000% Due 10/31/2021 2,000,000.00 09/25/2019 1.71% 2,012,031.25 2,011,952.72 100.70 1.66% 2,013,984.00 16,739.13 1.92% 2,031.28 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.09 2.02 As of September 30, 2019 28 11/19/19 122 of 237 Holdings Report City of Cupertino -Account #10659 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 912828J43 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 02/28/2022 2,000,000.00 09/11/2019 1.64% 2,005,078.13 2,004,970.93 100.32 1.62% 2,006,328.00 2,980.77 1.90% 1,357.07 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.42 2.36 912828XG0 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 06/30/2022 2,000,000.00 09/11/2019 1.61% 2,028,203.13 2,027,678.81 101.45 1.58% 2,028,984.00 10,740.49 1.93% 1,305.19 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.75 2.65 912828L57 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 09/30/2022 2,000,000.00 09/11/2019 1.62% 2,007,890.63 2,007,756.05 100.50 1.58% 2,009,922.00 95.63 1.90% 2,165.95 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.00 2.91 912828N30 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 12/31/2022 2,000,000.00 Various 1.68% 2,029,085.94 2,028,204.11 101.71 1.58% 2,034,140.00 10,740.49 1.93% 5,935.89 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.25 3.12 912828T91 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 10/31/2023 2,000,000.00 Various 1.94% 1,973,554.69 1,975,628.27 100.21 1.57% 2,004,296.00 13,600.55 1.91% 28,667.73 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.09 3.91 912828V23 US Treasury Note 2.250% Due 12/31/2023 1,500,000.00 06/21/2019 1.80% 1,529,472.66 1,527,705.37 102.77 1.57% 1,541,542.50 8,529.21 1.47% 13,837.13 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.25 4.03 912828B66 US Treasury Note 2.750% Due 02/15/2024 2,000,000.00 Various 2.13% 2,053,613.28 2,050,932.45 104.96 1.57% 2,099,296.00 7,024.45 1.99% 48,363.55 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.38 4.11 912828X70 US Treasury Note 2.000% Due 04/30/2024 1,700,000.00 06/10/2019 1.92% 1,705,976.56 1,705,601.56 101.90 1.57% 1,732,339.10 14,228.26 1.65% 26,737.54 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.59 4.34 912828XX3 US Treasury Note 2.000% Due 06/30/2024 2,000,000.00 Various 1.80% 2,018,574.22 2,018,243.29 101.94 1.57% 2,038,828.00 10,108.69 1.94% 20,584.71 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.75 4.50 912828D56 US Treasury Note 2.375% Due 08/15/2024 1,700,000.00 09/18/2019 1.71% 1,753,191.41 1,752,835.22 103.73 1.58% 1,763,352.20 5,156.59 1.67% 10,516.98 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.88 4.59 TOTAL US Treasury 22,900,000.00 1.77% 23,093,781.28 23,088,773.88 1.59% 23,252,543.80 100,005.74 22.08% 163,769.92 Aaa / AA+ Aaa 3.50 3.34 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 103,495,707.12 1.94% 104,679,192.25 104,613,572.17 1.84% 105,279,538.68 501,421.38 100.00% 665,966.51 Aa1 / AA Aaa 2.62 2.32 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 105,780,960.06 As of September 30, 2019 29 11/19/19 123 of 237 SECTION |Section 4 |Transactions 30 11/19/19 124 of 237 Transaction Ledger City of Cupertino -Account #10659 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 07/17/2019 3135G0V75 1,500,000.00 FNMA Note 1.75% Due: 07/02/2024 98.993 1.96%1,484,895.00 656.25 1,485,551.25 0.00 Purchase 07/31/2019 912828XX3 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 2% Due: 06/30/2024 100.629 1.87%1,509,433.59 2,527.17 1,511,960.76 0.00 Purchase 08/09/2019 009158AV8 1,675,000.00 Air Products & Chemicals Callable Note Cont 4/30/2024 3.35% Due: 07/31/2024 105.744 2.13%1,771,212.00 1,402.81 1,772,614.81 0.00 Purchase 08/15/2019 69371RQ25 370,000.00 Paccar Financial Corp Note 2.15% Due: 08/15/2024 99.779 2.20%369,182.30 0.00 369,182.30 0.00 Purchase 08/16/2019 3137B4WB8 1,000,000.00 FHLMC K033 A2 Due: 07/25/2023 103.766 1.18%1,037,656.25 1,275.00 1,038,931.25 0.00 Purchase 08/22/2019 3137B7MZ9 1,000,000.00 FHLMC K036 A2 Due: 10/25/2023 106.191 1.92%1,061,914.06 2,057.42 1,063,971.48 0.00 Purchase 08/27/2019 43815NAC8 490,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A3 1.78% Due: 08/15/2023 99.999 1.79%489,995.93 0.00 489,995.93 0.00 Purchase 08/29/2019 477870AC3 1,000,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A3 2.21% Due: 12/15/2023 100.926 1.79%1,009,257.81 2,148.61 1,011,406.42 0.00 Purchase 08/29/2019 47789JAD8 1,000,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A3 2.91% Due: 07/17/2023 102.082 1.87%1,020,820.31 1,131.67 1,021,951.98 0.00 Purchase 08/30/2019 404280BS7 500,000.00 HSBC Holdings PLC Callable Note 1X 5/18/2023 3.95% Due: 05/18/2024 105.084 2.47%525,420.00 5,595.83 531,015.83 0.00 Purchase 09/09/2019 3130A3DL5 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 2.375% Due: 09/08/2023 103.316 1.52%2,066,320.00 131.94 2,066,451.94 0.00 Purchase 09/09/2019 313378JP7 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 2.375% Due: 09/10/2021 101.577 1.57%2,031,540.00 23,618.06 2,055,158.06 0.00 Purchase 09/11/2019 808513AT2 500,000.00 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 12/25/2022 2.65% Due: 01/25/2023 102.065 2.01%510,325.00 1,693.06 512,018.06 0.00 Purchase 09/12/2019 89238TAD5 1,500,000.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 2.96% Due: 09/15/2022 101.168 1.15%1,517,519.53 3,330.00 1,520,849.53 0.00 June 30, 2019 through September 30, 2019 As of September 30, 2019 31 11/19/19 125 of 237 Transaction Ledger City of Cupertino -Account #10659 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Purchase 09/12/2019 912828J43 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due: 02/28/2022 100.254 1.64%2,005,078.13 1,153.85 2,006,231.98 0.00 Purchase 09/12/2019 912828L57 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due: 09/30/2022 100.395 1.62%2,007,890.63 15,778.69 2,023,669.32 0.00 Purchase 09/12/2019 912828XG0 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due: 06/30/2022 101.410 1.61%2,028,203.13 8,546.20 2,036,749.33 0.00 Purchase 09/13/2019 06051GHF9 300,000.00 Bank of America Corp Callable Note 1X 3/5/2023 3.55% Due: 03/05/2024 103.883 2.38%311,649.00 236.67 311,885.67 0.00 Purchase 09/13/2019 48128BAB7 300,000.00 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note 1X 1/15/2022 2.972% Due: 01/15/2023 101.618 2.26%304,854.00 1,436.47 306,290.47 0.00 Purchase 09/13/2019 89114QCA4 1,500,000.00 Toronto Dominion Bank Note 2.65% Due: 06/12/2024 101.817 2.24%1,527,255.00 10,047.92 1,537,302.92 0.00 Purchase 09/13/2019 95000U2B8 300,000.00 Wells Fargo & Company Note 2.625% Due: 07/22/2022 100.995 2.26%302,985.00 1,115.63 304,100.63 0.00 Purchase 09/16/2019 3130A2UW4 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 2.875% Due: 09/13/2024 105.169 1.79%2,103,380.00 479.17 2,103,859.17 0.00 Purchase 09/18/2019 43815HAC1 1,600,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due: 08/22/2022 101.055 1.45%1,616,875.00 3,540.00 1,620,415.00 0.00 Purchase 09/18/2019 65479GAD1 1,500,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 3.06% Due: 03/15/2023 101.414 1.37%1,521,210.93 382.50 1,521,593.43 0.00 Purchase 09/19/2019 912828D56 1,700,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.375% Due: 08/15/2024 103.129 1.71%1,753,191.41 3,840.01 1,757,031.42 0.00 Purchase 09/25/2019 02665WCQ2 300,000.00 American Honda Finance Note 3.625% Due: 10/10/2023 106.102 2.04%318,306.00 4,984.38 323,290.38 0.00 Purchase 09/25/2019 404280BS7 1,000,000.00 HSBC Holdings PLC Callable Note 1X 5/18/2023 3.95% Due: 05/18/2024 104.737 2.53%1,047,370.00 13,934.72 1,061,304.72 0.00 Purchase 09/26/2019 912828B66 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.75% Due: 02/15/2024 104.793 1.61%523,964.84 1,569.29 525,534.13 0.00 Purchase 09/26/2019 912828F96 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 2% Due: 10/31/2021 100.602 1.71%2,012,031.25 16,195.65 2,028,226.90 0.00 June 30, 2019 through September 30, 2019 As of September 30, 2019 32 11/19/19 126 of 237 Transaction Ledger City of Cupertino -Account #10659 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Purchase 09/26/2019 912828N30 1,150,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due: 12/31/2022 101.594 1.62%1,168,328.13 5,843.75 1,174,171.88 0.00 Purchase 09/26/2019 912828T34 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due: 09/30/2021 98.855 1.71%1,977,109.38 11,004.10 1,988,113.48 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2019 912828T91 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due: 10/31/2023 100.113 1.60%500,566.41 3,378.06 503,944.47 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2019 912828XX3 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 2% Due: 06/30/2024 101.828 1.60%509,140.63 2,500.00 511,640.63 0.00 Subtotal 39,185,000.00 39,944,880.65 151,534.88 40,096,415.53 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 39,185,000.00 39,944,880.65 151,534.88 40,096,415.53 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 07/17/2019 912828TH3 1,300,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.875% Due: 07/31/2019 100.000 0.88%1,300,000.00 5,247.58 1,305,247.58 220.29 Sale 07/31/2019 3134G8S83 1,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 3/30/2017 1.5% Due: 12/30/2019 99.725 2.17%997,250.00 5,000.00 1,002,250.00 -2,750.00 Sale 08/08/2019 313376C94 1,675,000.00 FHLB Note 2.625% Due: 12/10/2021 102.420 1.57%1,715,535.00 7,083.85 1,722,618.85 13,568.39 Sale 08/21/2019 912828TR1 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1% Due: 09/30/2019 99.891 2.00%499,453.13 1,953.55 501,406.68 -321.21 Sale 08/26/2019 912828TR1 425,000.00 US Treasury Note 1% Due: 09/30/2019 99.902 2.02%424,584.96 1,718.58 426,303.54 -247.21 Sale 08/28/2019 3134G9MW4 1,025,000.00 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 5/26/2017 1.35% Due: 05/26/2020 99.614 1.87%1,021,043.50 3,536.25 1,024,579.75 -3,956.50 Sale 08/28/2019 912828TR1 1,075,000.00 US Treasury Note 1% Due: 09/30/2019 99.902 2.08%1,073,950.20 4,405.74 1,078,355.94 -649.54 Sale 08/29/2019 313378UP4 500,000.00 FHLB Note 2% Due: 10/11/2019 99.993 2.04%499,965.00 3,833.33 503,798.33 -365.30 Subtotal 7,500,000.00 7,531,781.79 32,778.88 7,564,560.67 5,498.92 June 30, 2019 through September 30, 2019 As of September 30, 2019 33 11/19/19 127 of 237 Transaction Ledger City of Cupertino -Account #10659 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Maturity 07/31/2019 912828TH3 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.875% Due: 07/31/2019 100.000 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/15/2019 9128282B5 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.75% Due: 08/15/2019 100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 09/13/2019 313383VN8 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 2% Due: 09/13/2019 100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 4,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 12,000,000.00 12,031,781.79 32,778.88 12,064,560.67 5,498.92 June 30, 2019 through September 30, 2019 As of September 30, 2019 34 11/19/19 128 of 237 Important Disclosures 2019 Chandler Asset Management,Inc,An Independent Registered Investment Adviser. Information contained herein is confidential.Prices are provided by IDC,an independent pricing source.In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value,Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures.Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A. Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return.The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results.These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings.Past performance may not be indicative of future results.Therefore,clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels.All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss.Economic factors,market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio. Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions.Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee,the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results.It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Source ice Data Indices,LLC ("ICE"),used with permission.ICE permits use of the ICE indices and related data on an "as is"basis;ICE,its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations,express and/or implied,including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use,including the indices,index data and any data included in,related to,or derived therefrom.Neither ICE data,its affiliates or their respective third party providers guarantee the quality,adequacy,accuracy,timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof,and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an "as is"basis and licensee's use it at licensee's own risk.ICE data,its affiliates and their respective third party do not sponsor,endorse,or recommend chandler asset management,or any of its products or services. This report is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a specific investment or legal advice.The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication,but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.Any opinions or views expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change.This report may contain forecasts and forward-looking statements which are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicator of future results.Past performance is not indicative of future results.This report is not intended to constitute an offer,solicitation,recommendation or advice regarding any securities or investment strategy and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. Fixed income investments are subject to interest,credit and market risk.Interest rate risk:the value of fixed income investments will decline as interest rates rise.Credit risk:the possibility that the borrower may not be able to repay interest and principal.Low rated bonds generally have to pay higher interest rates to attract investors willing to take on greater risk.Market risk:the bond market in general could decline due to economic conditions,especially during periods of rising interest rates. Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s,S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement,however we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Security level ratings for U.S.Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”)reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated.The issuing U.S.Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P,Moody’s and Fitch respectively. As of September 30, 2019 35 11/19/19 129 of 237 Benchmark Disclosures ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index The ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury &Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market.Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s,S&P and Fitch).Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity,at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance,a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.(Index:GVA0.Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information) As of September 30, 2019 36 11/19/19 130 of 237 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 09/30/2019CITY OF CUPERTINO 10/15/2019 04:34:44 PM EDTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition UnitsACCOUNT: 16737400 CITY OF CUPERTINONET CASHNET CASH.0000($1,015,585.10) ($1,015,585.10) $.00 .00.0000.00U.S. DOLLARSSUBTOTAL.0000($1,015,585.10) ($1,015,585.10) $.00 .00.0000.00CASH SWEEPPROPRIETARY FUNDSVP452000410,491,292.2200$10,491,292.22 $10,491,292.22$.00 .00.0000.00WELLS FARGO 100% TREASURY MONEY MARKET FUND - #008SUBTOTAL10,491,292.2200$10,491,292.22 $10,491,292.22$.00 .00.0000.00SAVINGS & CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSITMARKETABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT06417G5Q72,000,000.0000 12/23/2019 $2,002,260.00 $2,000,538.93 $1,721.07 .09 N/A N/A.0000.00BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA CERT OF DEPOSIT65558TFW02,000,000.0000 03/23/2020 $2,006,060.00 $2,000,000.00 $6,060.00 .30 N/A N/A.0000.00NORDEA BK ABP NY CERT OF DEPOSIT89114MYP62,000,000.0000 04/02/2020 $2,005,880.00 $2,000,000.00 $5,880.00 .29 N/A N/A.0000.00TORONTO-DOMINION CERT OF DEPOSITSUBTOTAL6,000,000.0000$6,014,200.00 $6,000,538.93 $13,661.07 .23.0000.00CORPORATE BONDSCORPORATE BONDS00440EAT4850,000.0000 11/03/2020 $852,745.50 $841,840.00 $10,905.50 1.30 A A3.0000.00ACE INA HOLDINGS DTD 11/03/15 2.300 11/03/2020009158AV81,675,000.0000 07/31/2024 $1,766,823.50 $1,771,212.00 ($4,388.50) (.25) A A2.0000.00AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS DTD 07/31/14 3.350 07/31/202402665WCQ21,300,000.0000 10/10/2023 $1,376,674.00 $1,345,306.00 $31,368.00 2.33 A A2.0000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE MED TERM NOTE037833AK61,000,000.0000 05/03/2023 $1,016,470.00 $984,840.00 $31,630.00 3.21 AA+ AA1.0000.00APPLE INC DTD 05/03/13 2.400 05/03/202306051GHF91,300,000.0000 03/05/2024 $1,351,038.00 $1,315,499.00 $35,539.00 2.70 A- A2.0000.00BANK OF AMERICA CORP DTD 03/05/18 03/05/202406406RAG21,000,000.0000 04/28/2023 $1,047,580.00 $1,013,650.00 $33,930.00 3.35 A A1.0000.00Page 111/19/19 131 of 237 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 09/30/2019CITY OF CUPERTINO 10/15/2019 04:34:44 PM EDTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition UnitsBANK OF NY MELLON CORP MED TERM NOTE24422ETG41,000,000.0000 03/06/2023 $1,028,410.00 $1,007,580.00 $20,830.00 2.07 A A2.0000.00JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP MED TERM NOTE369550BE71,000,000.0000 05/11/2021 $1,017,510.00 $1,004,920.00 $12,590.00 1.25 A+ A2.0000.00GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP DTD 05/11/18 3.000 05/11/2021404280BS71,500,000.0000 05/18/2024 $1,569,825.00 $1,572,790.00 ($2,965.00) (.19) A A2.0000.00HSBC HOLDINGS PLC DTD 05/18/18 05/18/202444932HAC71,500,000.0000 09/08/2022 $1,506,900.00 $1,467,755.00 $39,145.00 2.67 A A2.0000.00IBM CREDIT CORP DTD 09/08/17 2.200 09/08/202248128BAB71,300,000.0000 01/15/2023 $1,323,517.00 $1,299,224.00 $24,293.00 1.87 A- A2.0000.00JPMORGAN CHASE & CO DTD 12/08/16 2.972 01/15/202368389XBK01,000,000.0000 09/15/2021 $998,820.00 $982,320.00 $16,500.00 1.68 A+ A1.0000.00ORACLE CORP DTD 07/07/16 1.900 09/15/202169353RFE31,200,000.0000 07/28/2022 $1,212,480.00 $1,210,236.00 $2,244.00 .19 A A2.0000.00PNC BANK NA DTD 07/28/17 2.450 07/28/202269371RP59435,000.0000 08/09/2023 $455,075.25 $449,315.85 $5,759.40 1.28 A+ A1.0000.00PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP DTD 08/09/18 3.400 08/09/202369371RQ25370,000.0000 08/15/2024 $369,911.20 $369,182.30 $728.90 .20 A+ A1.0000.00PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP MED TERM NOTE808513AT21,500,000.0000 01/25/2023 $1,527,030.00 $1,504,955.00 $22,075.00 1.47 A A2.0000.00CHARLES SCHWAB CORP DTD 12/07/17 2.650 01/25/2023857477AV51,000,000.0000 05/19/2021 $1,000,110.00 $986,055.00 $14,055.00 1.43 A A1.0000.00STATE STREET CORP DTD 05/19/16 1.950 05/19/202189114QCA41,500,000.0000 06/12/2024 $1,528,275.00 $1,527,255.00 $1,020.00 .07 A AA3.0000.00TORONTO-DOMINION BANK MED TERM NOTE89236TDP71,000,000.0000 01/11/2022 $1,015,830.00 $992,200.00 $23,630.00 2.38 AA- AA3.0000.00TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP MED TERM NOTE931142EK51,000,000.0000 06/26/2023 $1,052,650.00 $1,023,630.00 $29,020.00 2.84 AA AA2.0000.00WALMART INC DTD 06/27/18 3.400 06/26/202395000U2B81,300,000.0000 07/22/2022 $1,314,430.00 $1,297,365.00 $17,065.00 1.32 A- A2.0000.00WELLS FARGO & COMPANY DTD 07/24/17 2.625 07/22/2022Page 211/19/19 132 of 237 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 09/30/2019CITY OF CUPERTINO 10/15/2019 04:34:44 PM EDTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition UnitsSUBTOTAL23,730,000.0000$24,332,104.45 $23,967,130.15 $364,974.30 1.52.0000.00US GOVERNMENTUS TREASURY NOTES AND BONDS912828B662,000,000.0000 02/15/2024 $2,099,300.00 $2,053,613.28 $45,686.72 2.22 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 02/18/14 2.750 02/15/2024912828D561,700,000.0000 08/15/2024 $1,763,359.00 $1,753,191.41 $10,167.59 .58 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 08/15/14 2.375 08/15/2024912828F962,000,000.0000 10/31/2021 $2,013,980.00 $2,012,031.25 $1,948.75 .10 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 10/31/14 2.000 10/31/2021912828J432,000,000.0000 02/28/2022 $2,006,320.00 $2,005,078.13 $1,241.87 .06 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 02/28/15 1.750 02/28/2022912828L572,000,000.0000 09/30/2022 $2,009,920.00 $2,007,890.63 $2,029.37 .10 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 09/30/15 1.750 09/30/2022912828N302,000,000.0000 12/31/2022 $2,034,140.00 $2,029,085.94 $5,054.06 .25 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 12/31/15 2.125 12/31/2022912828T342,000,000.0000 09/30/2021 $1,979,540.00 $1,977,109.38 $2,430.62 .12 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 09/30/16 1.125 09/30/2021912828T912,000,000.0000 10/31/2023 $2,004,300.00 $1,973,554.69 $30,745.31 1.56 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 10/31/16 1.625 10/31/2023912828V231,500,000.0000 12/31/2023 $1,541,550.00 $1,529,472.66 $12,077.34 .79 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 01/03/17 2.250 12/31/2023912828X701,700,000.0000 04/30/2024 $1,732,334.00 $1,705,976.56 $26,357.44 1.55 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 05/01/17 2.000 04/30/2024912828XG02,000,000.0000 06/30/2022 $2,028,980.00 $2,028,203.13 $776.87 .04 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 06/30/15 2.125 06/30/2022912828XX32,000,000.0000 06/30/2024 $2,038,820.00 $2,018,574.22 $20,245.78 1.00 N/A AAA.0000.00US TREASURY NOTE DTD 06/30/17 2.000 06/30/2024SUBTOTAL22,900,000.0000$23,252,543.00 $23,093,781.28 $158,761.72 .69.0000.00FEDERAL AGENCYGOVERNMENT AGENCIES3130A0F701,500,000.0000 12/08/2023 $1,604,880.00 $1,565,940.00 $38,940.00 2.49 AA+ AAA.0000.00Page 311/19/19 133 of 237 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 09/30/2019CITY OF CUPERTINO 10/15/2019 04:34:44 PM EDTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition UnitsFED HOME LN BK DTD 12/09/13 3.375 12/08/20233130A0XE51,500,000.0000 03/08/2024 $1,607,055.00 $1,568,115.00 $38,940.00 2.48 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 02/12/14 3.250 03/08/20243130A1XJ21,500,000.0000 06/14/2024 $1,583,730.00 $1,564,890.20 $18,839.80 1.20 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 05/08/14 2.875 06/14/20243130A2UW42,000,000.0000 09/13/2024 $2,114,420.00 $2,103,380.00 $11,040.00 .52 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 08/15/14 2.875 09/13/20243130A3DL52,000,000.0000 09/08/2023 $2,057,700.00 $2,066,320.00 ($8,620.00) (.42) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 10/17/14 2.375 09/08/2023313376C941,325,000.0000 12/10/2021 $1,352,480.50 $1,369,559.75 ($17,079.25) (1.25) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 11/04/11 2.625 12/10/2021313378JP72,000,000.0000 09/10/2021 $2,027,140.00 $2,031,540.00 ($4,400.00) (.22) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 03/05/12 2.375 09/10/2021313378UP41,500,000.0000 10/11/2019 $1,500,060.00 $1,519,380.00 ($19,320.00) (1.27) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN BK DTD 04/11/12 2.000 10/11/20193133EGJ302,000,000.0000 11/18/2019 $1,997,960.00 $1,984,760.00 $13,200.00 .67 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED FARM CREDIT BK DTD 11/18/16 1.100 11/18/20193134G8S832,000,000.0000 12/30/2019 $1,998,020.00 $2,000,000.00 ($1,980.00) (.10) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE SER 00053134G9G433,000,000.0000 12/30/2019 $2,993,430.00 $3,000,000.00 ($6,570.00) (.22) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE3134G9MW4975,000.0000 05/26/2020 $971,460.75 $975,000.00 ($3,539.25) (.36) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE SER 00003134G9SK42,000,000.0000 06/30/2020 $1,994,520.00 $2,000,000.00 ($5,480.00) (.27) AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE SER 00013135G0U431,500,000.0000 09/12/2023 $1,571,985.00 $1,559,805.00 $12,180.00 .78 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED NATL MTG ASSN DTD 09/14/18 2.875 09/12/20233135G0V751,500,000.0000 07/02/2024 $1,508,550.00 $1,484,895.00 $23,655.00 1.59 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED NATL MTG ASSN DTD 07/08/19 1.750 07/02/20243136G3QQ13,000,000.0000 11/25/2020 $2,988,960.00 $3,000,000.00 ($11,040.00) (.37) N/A N/A.0000.00FED NATL MTG ASSN SER 0002Page 411/19/19 134 of 237 WELLS FARGOMarket/Cost Value Comparison Report General ReportingBy Account By Industry Class From Month End With Pricing 09/30/2019CITY OF CUPERTINO 10/15/2019 04:34:44 PM EDTACCOUNT: All Accounts Selected * = Trade or Other Activity Pending Maturity Market Fed Gain/Loss S & P Moody`s Units in EncumbrdAsset IDUnits DateValue Tax Cost Amount % Rating Rating Transition Units3137EADB21,500,000.0000 01/13/2022 $1,523,100.00 $1,520,100.00 $3,000.00 .20 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP MED TERM NOTE3137EAEN51,500,000.0000 06/19/2023 $1,560,645.00 $1,553,100.00 $7,545.00 .49 AA+ AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP SER *SUBTOTAL32,300,000.0000$32,956,096.25 $32,866,784.95 $89,311.30 .27.0000.00MORTGAGE/ASSET-BACKED SECURITIESCORPORATE BACKED OBLIGATION43815HAC11,600,000.0000 08/22/2022 $1,618,496.00 $1,616,875.00 $1,621.00 .10 N/A AAA.0000.00HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER T SER 2018-3 CL A3 *0 DAY DELAY*43815NAC8490,000.0000 08/15/2023 $488,961.20 $489,995.93 ($1,034.73) (.21) AAA AAA.0000.00HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER T SER 2019-3 CL A3 *0 DAY DELAY*477870AC31,000,000.0000 12/15/2023 $1,006,580.00 $1,009,257.81 ($2,677.81) (.27) N/A AAA.0000.00JOHN DEERE OWNER TRUST SER 2019-B CL A3 *0 DAY DELAY*47789JAD81,000,000.0000 07/17/2023 $1,017,880.00 $1,020,820.31 ($2,940.31) (.29) N/A AAA.0000.00JOHN DEERE OWNER TRUST SER 2019-A CL A3 *0 DAY DELAY*65479GAD11,500,000.0000 03/15/2023 $1,521,690.00 $1,521,210.93 $479.07 .03 AAA AAA.0000.00NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER SER 2018-B CL A3 *0 DAY DELAY*89238TAD51,500,000.0000 09/15/2022 $1,517,115.00 $1,517,519.53 ($404.53) (.03) AAA AAA.0000.00TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER SER 2018-B CL A3 *0 DAY DELAY*MORTGAGE BACKED OBLIGATION3137B4WB81,000,000.0000 07/25/2023 $1,036,400.00 $1,037,656.25 ($1,256.25) (.12) N/A AAA.0000.00FED HOME LN MTG CORP SER K033 CL A2 *24 DAY DELAY*3137B7MZ91,000,000.0000 10/25/2023 $1,055,790.00 $1,061,914.06 ($6,124.06) (.58) N/A AAA.0000.00FHLMC MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURED P SER K036 CL A2 *24 DAY DELAY*SUBTOTAL9,090,000.0000$9,262,912.20 $9,275,249.82 ($12,337.62) (.13).0000.00ACCOUNT 16737400 TOTAL 104,511,292.2200$105,293,563.02 $104,679,192.25 $614,370.77 .59.0000.00GRAND TOTAL104,511,292.2200$105,293,563.02 $104,679,192.25 $614,370.77 .59.0000.00END OF REPORTPage 511/19/19 135 of 237 10/2/2019 LAIF Regular Monthly Statement https://laifms.treasurer.ca.gov/RegularStatement.aspx 1/1 Local Agency Investment Fund P.O. Box 942809 Sacramento, CA 94209-0001 (916) 653-3001 October 02, 2019 LAIF Home PMIA Average Monthly Yields CITY OF CUPERTINO FINANCE MANAGER 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Account Number: 98-43-231 September 2019 Statement Tran Type Definitions Effective Date Transaction Date Tran Type Confirm Number Authorized Caller Amount 9/3/2019 9/3/2019 RW 1616524 ZACHARY KORACH -37,000,000.00 Account Summary Total Deposit:0.00 Beginning Balance:57,318,580.20 Total Withdrawal:-37,000,000.00 Ending Balance:20,318,580.20 11/19/19 136 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Senate Bill (SB) 2 Planning Grants Program Application Adopt Resolution No. 19-137 authorizing application for, and receipt of, SB 2 Planning Grants Program Funds File #:19-6400,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 137 of 237 https://cupertino.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=7878449&GUID=49410CF8-4FD0-414D-B6C2-D612407E4C34[11/13/2019 7:16:38 PM] Embedded Secure Document The file https://cupertino.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=7878449&GUID=49410CF8-4FD0-414D-B6C2- D612407E4C34 is a secure document that has been embedded in this document. Double click the pushpin to view. 11/19/19 138 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10425 S. De Anza Boulevard Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10425 S. De Anza Boulevard. File #:19-6514,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 139 of 237 11/19/19 140 of 237 11/19/19 141 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market, Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10983 N. Wolfe Rd. Recommend approval to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the Application for Alcoholic Beverage License for Welcome Market Inc (dba 99 Ranch Market), 10983 N. Wolfe Road. File #:19-6516,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 142 of 237 11/19/19 143 of 237 11/19/19 144 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Second reading of Municipal Code Amendments to the Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 5, adopting new policies regulating the sale of tobacco, such as requiring a local permit to sell tobacco products, prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco, prohibiting new businesses from selling tobacco near schools and reducing tobacco retailer density, prohibiting tobacco sales at pharmacies and in vending machines, and limiting storefront signage. Conduct second reading and enact Ordinance No. 19-2190; "An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino adding chapter 5.50 to title 5 (Business Licenses and Regulations) to regulate the sale of tobacco products and repealing chapter 10.27 of the Municipal Code (Cigarette and/or Tobacco Vending Machines)" File #:19-6139,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 145 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments has been continued to a future meeting date and item will be renoticed. These topics will be discussed in the study session. Adoption of the 2019 California Energy and Green Building Standards Codes with local amendments has been continued to a future meeting date. File #:19-6524,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 146 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Update on Library Expansion Project, selection of Conceptual Design, approval of project delivery method, and direction on project funding. 1. Conceptual Design:Select either the One-Story or the Two-Story Conceptual Design. Additional actions listed below as determined by Conceptual Design selection. 2. One-Story Conceptual Design a. Approve use of a traditional Design-Bid-Build project delivery method. b. Authorize the City Manager or her designee to negotiate and enter into all agreements as necessary with a qualified architectural firm and construction/project management firm for an amount not-to-exceed $808,200. 3. Two-Story Conceptual Design a. Authorize use of a Design-Build project delivery method, using best value selection, assuming Design-Build is determined to be feasible. b. Approve Resolution 19-138 executing a loan agreement of up to $3,000,000 from the General Fund to Capital Fund for the Library Room Expansion. c. Approve Budget Amendment 1920-070 increasing appropriation by $3,000,000 for the Library Expansion Project. d. Authorize the City Manager or her designee to negotiate and enter into all agreements as necessary with a qualified architectural firm and construction/project management firm for an amount not-to-exceed $1,870,500. 4. Staffing:Authorize transfer of a 3-year Limited Term Project Manager in the Department of Public Works from the new City Hall project to the Library Expansion Project. File #:19-5951,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 147 of 237 LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT - PROGRAMMING EXERCISE September 12, 2019 Overall Goal: Beautiful, Within budget, Flexible PROGRAM ROOM Program Room Charactoristics Components Notes/Comments Good Acoustics 130 seat min audience capacity matches capacity of existing Community Hall Light Blocking Flexible Space (ie room can be divided, used for multiple programs/activities)minimum of 3 rooms Media compatible with various technology Utility Sink High Density Power Supplemental Storage Compliments ex. Library Architectural style Kitchenette Consider alcove with lockable doors, could be outside the Program Room Low Maintenance Spillover Seating (and tables) For teens/adults in the program room when not programmed Direct staff acess to the first and second floor Presentation Space Raised area for panel discussion up to 6 speakers (removeable or retractable)High Ceilings Clean Sightlines STORAGE (table and chairs)Adjacent to where it will be used RESTROOMS As required by Code, prefer single occupant JANITORIAL CLOSET Components Notes/Comments Rank 170 seat min. audience capacity 2 Larger Story Room (60 seated, 100 on floor)existing: 40 seated, 55 on the floor 1 Separate off-hours entry 2 Ability to hang art Storage for frequent users 1-2 small conference rooms Components Notes/Comments Performance Space (Stage) Outside gathering space Roof top patio/ Green Roof Maker Space Public Art $5M Essential Program Elements Discretionary Program Elements Wish List Attachment B 11/19/19 148 of 237 One-story CIRCULATION Required spaces to support program functions - 928 SF in total Attachment C 11/19/19 149 of 237 Required spaces to support program functions - 820 GSF Two-story STAIRCASES 230 GSF LOBBY 130 GSF Attachment D 11/19/19 150 of 237 STAIRCASES 257 GSF CIRCULATION 494 GSF Required spaces to support program functions - 910 GSF Two-story 11/19/19 151 of 237 Page 1October 24, 2019 Library Expansion Project CCMP Preferred Alternative (July 7, 2015) Budget Approval (June 18, 2019) Building Systems Assessment (Aug/Sept 2019) Cost and Time Estimate Update (Sept/Oct 2019) City Council •Project Update & Approval •Funding •Delivery Method Nov 19, 2019 Engage Architect (Nov 2019/Jan 2020) Issue Statement of Interest for DB Firms Nov-Dec 2019 Develop Performance Criteria and 35% Plans (Jan/March 2020) Architect Develops Construction Documents September 2020 City Council •Project Update •Project Delivery Recommendation March 2020 Issue RFQ to DB Firms (March 2020) City Council •Award Contract Construction: (November 2020) or •DB Agreement: (July 2020) Construction begins (January 2021) Construction begins (August 2020) City Council •Opening Ceremony DBB - November 2021 DB – September 2021 Design – Bid - Build Design - Build City Council •Authority to use Design Build on CIP Projects over $1M (September 2019) Issue RFP to Shortlisted DB Firms (April -May 2020) Attachment E 11/19/19 152 of 237 CITY OF CUPERTINO Legislation Text Subject: Approve the First Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2019-20 1. Accept the City Manager’s First Quarter Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2019-20 2. Adopt Resolution No. 19-139 approving First Quarter budget adjustments 3. Adopt Resolution No. 19-140 amending the Compensation Program for the Unrepresented (Management and Confidential) Employees File #:19-6398,Version:1 CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 11/13/2019Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ 11/19/19 153 of 237 ATTACHMENT C FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Transit guideway study 149,901 100 General Fund Budget Carryover AC2 Tantau 14 - Pass-thru 2,038,863 100 General Fund Budget Carryover AC2 Tantau 14 - Pass-thru 1,993,796 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Acterra habitat enhancement at Stocklmeir 50,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Adobe After Effects 7,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover CIP Feasibility Studies 378,220 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Alternative Commute Pilot Program 60,500 100 General Fund Budget Carryover ARKnet project purchases 5,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover BBF pool pump 60,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover BBF Pool Replastering: project in progress 194,758 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Bi-annual safety uniform purchase: + addition of pants 24,730 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Bike fleet expansion 5,577 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Bike Plan Updates, Bike/Ped Traffic Counts 82,230 100 General Fund Budget Carryover CAP/GHG report 2,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Chyron Provisioning, camera stabilizer system 19,310 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Creekside concrete work/mowband 10,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Cupertino Village ongoing project -pass thru 4,023 100 General Fund Budget Carryover De Anza Hotel on ongoing project - pass thru 29,419 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Design support for CAP/GHG report 6,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Don Burnett Bridge repair, fencing, inspection 243,008 100 General Fund Budget Carryover ECM Laserfiche 15,852 100 General Fund Budget Carryover EOC chairs 8,967 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Equipment and trailor acquisition 20,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Ergonomic chair 1,025 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Part-time staffing to finish records project 5,433 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Facility repairs: work in progress 33,458 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Facility system replacements, including HVAC & MEP 37,470 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Fountain infrastructure: work in progress 20,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Functional Reorganization - Park Planning & Restoration 4,200 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Grassroots project 502 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Green Building Code update 17,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Greenhouse Gas Inventory project 32,535 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Hidden Treasures 16,304 100 General Fund Budget Carryover HVAC repairs: work in progress 79,844 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Hydroseed @ Regnart: work to be scheduled 45,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Hydroseed at Community Hall: work in progress 4,977 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Irrigation Controller Settlement: replacements in process 273,672 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Irrigation Improvement Special Project 11,381 DETAILED CARRYOVERS, COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS, AND ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVERS 11/19/19 154 of 237 ATTACHMENT C FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DETAILED CARRYOVERS, COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS, AND ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVERS 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Lawn Buster Drought Tolerant Planting Pilot 175,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Locker room floor replacement: work in progress 17,096 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Marina Plaza ongoing project: pass-thru 37,045 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Marketing EV charging station 5,400 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Office re-configuration (Service Center)286,574 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Ongoing scanning project 22,507 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Planned Transportation Projects: work in progress 228,826 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Playground Chip: purchase in progress 49,790 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Preschool kitchen repl, sewer replacment (Bldg Assessment)99,938 100 General Fund Budget Carryover QCC, SR CTR, McClellan Ranch Conf upgrades 145,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Community Hall projector replacement 40,672 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Restroom construction/remodels at Memoral, Jolly, Linda Vista Parks 79,583 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Rodent, Museum painting, HVAC/MEP repairs/replacements 83,375 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Safe Routes to School program supplies 10,208 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Scanning project: work in progress 64,009 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Senior Mobility Program: work in progress 22,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Seven Spring ongoing code case - pass thru 12,500 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Sister city carryover - Bhubaneswar 1,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Special Project: Tree Inventory: work in progress 21,096 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Storm drain repairs and inspection: work in progress 279,475 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Street Light Poles: procurement phased due to no storage 101,760 100 General Fund Budget Carryover The Hamptons ongoing project - pass thru 108,640 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Traffic light upgrades: work in progress 23,995 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Traffic Signal Intersection Modifications 64,923 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Vallco Town Center ongoing project - pass thru 67,839 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Applications projects 175,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Westport ongoing project - pass thru 18,627 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Wilson Park Field Renovation 34,200 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Wine trail wayfinding signage 54,000 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Wireless Master Plan: work in progress 156,570 100 General Fund Budget Carryover Zero Waste Kit 200 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 8,478,803 210 Storm Drain Improvement Budget Carryover Minor Storm Drain Improvements: work in progress 88,828 230 Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain Budget Carryover St Sweeping Contract Litigation/Enhanced St Sweeping 147,238 265 Housing Budget Carryover BMR Linkage Fees Update 100,150 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Bridge Rehab: project in progress 515,135 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Complete annual asphalt project: work in progress 2,424,702 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Complete isolated dig-outs, crack & fog seal 180,551 11/19/19 155 of 237 ATTACHMENT C FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DETAILED CARRYOVERS, COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS, AND ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVERS 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Complete monument gateway sign project 25,859 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Complete Regnart Road repairs: work in progress 125,235 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Orange & Byrne Sidewalk Improvement 3,288,493 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Ph 2 McClellan Sidewalk Improvement 595,861 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover St Median Irrg Plant Replacement: project in progress 4,620 270 Transportation Fund Budget Carryover Striping Improvements McClellan Rd Bike Lanes 22,277 280 Park Dedication Budget Carryover Lawrence-Mitty Park: pending purchase 8,227,099 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TOTAL 15,746,048 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover ADA Improvements: project in progress 98,953 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Bike Implementation: project in progress 3,237,590 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Citywide Park & Recreation MP: project in progress 88,584 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover CW Bldg Condition Assess: project in progress 974,369 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover DeAnza Med Islnd Landscaping Ph 2: project in progress 7,899 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover DeAnza/McClellan Signal Maint: project in progress 145,700 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Green Bike Lanes: project in progress 95,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Inclusive Play Area: project in progress 6,499 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Interim City Hall: project in progress 418,499 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover McClellan West-Parking Lot Improvement: project in progress 25,304 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover MR Construct Trash Enclosure: project in progress 96,172 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover New City Hall: project in progress 3,500,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover QCC Fire Alarm Control Panel Upgrade: project in progress 40,896 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Regnart Road Improvements: project in progress 21,359 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover SCB/Bandley Signal & Median Imps: project in progress 150,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover SCCP Chain MP-MCLN to SCB: project in progress 97,143 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Senior Center Repairs: project in progress 144,082 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Senior Ctr Walkway Replacement: project in progress 14,289 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover St Light Install - Annual Infill: project in progress 26,050 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover St Light Install-Randy & Larry: project in progress 341,198 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover St Light Replacement CW: project in progress 200,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Stevens Crk Bank Repair: project in progress 100,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Carryover Stelling/280 Ped Bridge Lighting: project in progress 38,433 427 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Budget Carryover Work in progress 38,117 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS TOTAL 9,906,136 520 Resource Recovery Budget Carryover China National Sword recycling 40,000 520 Resource Recovery Budget Carryover Enhanced Street sweeping 150,000 520 Resource Recovery Budget Carryover Household Hazardous Waste Expense 45,000 520 Resource Recovery Budget Carryover Outstanding landfill invoices 200,000 520 Resource Recovery Budget Carryover Waste Characterization Special Project 150,000 11/19/19 156 of 237 ATTACHMENT C FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DETAILED CARRYOVERS, COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS, AND ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVERS 560 Blackberry Farm Budget Carryover Golf course maintenance and repair 13,246 560 Blackberry Farm Budget Carryover Golf course maintenance and repair 63,942 560 Blackberry Farm Budget Carryover Golf Course evaluation 10,600 560 Blackberry Farm Budget Carryover Picnic tables/umbrellas/counter display 2,899 570 Sports Center Budget Carryover Facility Updates: work in progress 75,000 570 Sports Center Budget Carryover HVAC: work in progress 51,707 570 Sports Center Budget Carryover Treadmill purchase 2,490 ENTERPRISE FUNDS TOTAL 804,884 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover Augmented reality project 10,000 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover Disaster recovery project 25,000 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover Multi-State Information Sharing & Analysis Center security review 40,000 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover O365 project 25,000 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover O365 project staff training 50,000 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover Office chairs 2,050 610 Innovation & Technology Budget Carryover Video surveillance 94,000 630 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Budget Carryover Fixed asset acquisition: procurement in progress 68,989 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 315,039 BUDGET CARRYOVER TOTAL 35,250,910 100 General Fund Council Action Maintenance Worker I for Storm Water 7,002 100 General Fund Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 1,375,738 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 1,382,740 230 Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 14,652 260 CDBG Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 5,703 265 BMR Housing Council Action Hello Housing contract 120,000 265 BMR Housing Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 5,877 270 Transportation Fund Council Action Maintenance Worker I for Storm Water 48,799 270 Transportation Fund Council Action Orange & Byrne Ave Sidewalk 1,275,438 270 Transportation Fund Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 52,494 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TOTAL 1,522,963 420 Capital Improvement Fund Council Action Regnart Creek Trail Revised Option D Construction 2,100,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Council Action Bicycle Wayfinding Project 65,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Council Action Linda Vista Trail project 615,500 420 Capital Improvement Fund Council Action McClellan Road Bike Corridor: Byrne to Torre 242,941 420 Capital Improvement Fund Council Action Regnart Creek Trail Landscaping Grant 150,000 420 Capital Improvement Fund Council Action Regnart Creek Trail Design 275,000 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS TOTAL 3,448,441 520 Resource Recovery Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 29,597 560 Blackberry Farm Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 8,751 11/19/19 157 of 237 ATTACHMENT C FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DETAILED CARRYOVERS, COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS, AND ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVERS 570 Sports Center Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 22,456 580 Recreation Program Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 33,269 ENTERPRISE FUNDS TOTAL 94,073 610 Innovation & Technology Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 86,342 620 Workers' Compensation Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 2,657 630 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Council Action Salary Adjustments due to Labor Negotiations 19,746 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 108,745 COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENT TOTAL 6,556,962 100 General Fund Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 1,962,541 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 1,962,541 230 Env Mgmt Cln Crk Strm Drain Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 54,933 265 BMR Housing Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 23,195 270 Transportation Fund Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 3,962,103 280 Park Dedication Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 35,575 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TOTAL 4,075,806 420 Capital Improvement Fund Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 4,135,551 427 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 43,869 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS TOTAL 4,179,420 520 Resource Recovery Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 19,875 580 Recreation Program Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 10,390 ENTERPRISE FUNDS TOTAL 30,265 610 Innovation & Technology Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 187,145 630 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Encumbrance Carryover Year End Soft Close 283,492 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 470,637 ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVER TOTAL 10,718,669 CARRYOVER, COUNCIL APPROVED ADJUSTMENT, AND ENCUMBRANCE CARRYOVER TOTAL 52,526,541 FY 2019-20 ADOPTED BUDGET 150,532,151 FY 2019-20 AMENDED BUDGET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 203,058,692 11/19/19 158 of 237 Fund GL Account Expenditures Revenues Fund Balance Description 100 General Fund 100-20-200-480-401 -237,847 (237,847)Apple Donation for Additional Sheriff Officers at Apple Park 100 General Fund 100-15-141-700-702 458,550 -458,550 Legal costs associated with Lehigh and Stevens Creek Quarries ($413,550) and Vallco related matters ($45,000) 100 General Fund 100-11-150-500-501 976 -976 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 100 General Fund 100-11-150-501-500 252 -252 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 100 General Fund 100-11-150-501-505 261 -261 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 100 General Fund 100-11-150-501-507 14 -14 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 100 General Fund 100-11-150-501-509 10 -10 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 100 General Fund 100-12-633-500-501 18,541 -18,541 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 101 General Fund 100-12-633-501-500 4,796 -4,796 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 102 General Fund 100-12-633-501-505 4,960 -4,960 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 103 General Fund 100-12-633-501-507 269 -269 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 104 General Fund 100-12-633-501-509 187 -187 Emergency Services Coordinator Conversion 100 General Fund 100-62-639-719-705 899 -899 Contingency for Teen Program 100 General Fund 100-62-640-719-705 3,782 -3,782 Contingency for Neighborhood Events 100 General Fund 100-71-701-750-028 4,300 -4,300 Cupertino Village Hotel 100 General Fund 100-71-701-750-031 48,350 -48,350 Westport 100 General Fund 100-71-701-600-608 2,200 -2,200 Ergo Equipment 100 General Fund 100-71-701-700-702 800 -800 Ergo Evaluation 100 General Fund 100-73-715-600-608 8,139 -8,139 2019 Code Books 100 General Fund 100-74-202-700-702 1,200 -1,200 Hearing Officer 100 General Fund 100-82-804-500-502 49,838 -49,838 Engineering Staffing Augmentation 100 General Fund 100-82-804-501-500 630 -630 Engineering Staffing Augmentation 100 General Fund 100-82-804-501-507 703 -703 Engineering Staffing Augmentation 100 General Fund 100-84-809-600-613 10,266 -10,266 Memorial Light Replacement 100 General Fund 100-84-813-700-702 17,400 -17,400 BBF Fencing 100 General Fund 100-87-828-700-702 53,965 -53,965 Library Aquarium TOTAL GENERAL FUND 691,288 237,847 453,441 260 Housing 260-72-709-600-623 4,983 -4,983 West Valley Community Service -Villa Village Reno 260 Housing 260-72-710-600-623 6,582 -6,582 Live Oak Adult Day Services 270 Transportation 270-85-820-700-702 30,000 -30,000 Annual Sidewalk Inspection TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 41,565 -41,565 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 732,853 237,847 495,006 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Recommended Adjustments Attachment D 11/19/19 159 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 1 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 1 PROGRAM PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS FOR ELIGIBILITY It is City of Cupertino policy that those certain persons holding positions hereinafter defined and designated either as management or confidential positions shall be eligible for participation under the Unrepresented Employees Compensation Program as hereby adopted by action of the City Council and as same may be amended or as otherwise modified from time to time. It is the stated purpose of this Compensation Program to give recognition to and to differentiate those eligible employees from represented employees who achieve economic gain and other conditions of employment through negotiation. It is the intent that through this policy and those which are adopted or as may be modified or rescinded from time to time such recognition may be given. Eligibility for inclusion with this Compensation program is limited to persons holding positions as management or confidential employees as defined under section 2.52.290 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. These are as designated by the Appointing Authority and may be modified as circumstances warrant. Although subject to change in accordance with provision of the Personnel Code, the positions in the following classifications have been designated as unrepresented. MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATIONS: Classification Title Accountant I Accountant II Accounting Technician Administrative Assistant Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Manager Assistant Director of Community Development/Building Official Assistant Director of Public Works Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services Assistant to the City Manager Business Systems Analyst/Program Manager Capital Improvement Program Manager Chief Technology Officer/Director of Information Services (Department Head) City Architect City Clerk City Engineer Community Relations Coordinator 11/19/19 160 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 2 Deputy Building Official Deputy City Attorney Deputy City Clerk Deputy City Manager Director of Administrative Services (Department Head) Director of Community Development (Department Head) Director of Recreation and Community Services (Department Head) Director of Public Works Economic Development Manager Emergency Services Coordinator Environmental Programs Manager Executive Assistant to the City Attorney Executive Assistant to the City Manager Finance Manager GIS Coordinator GIS Program Manager Human Resources Analyst I Human Resources Analyst II Human Resources Assistant Human Resources Manager Human Resources Technician Information Technology Assistant Innovation and Technology Manager – Applications Innovation and Technology Manager - Infrastructure Legal Services Manager Management Analyst Network SpecialistPark Restoration and Improvement Manager Permit Center Manager Planning Manager Public Information Officer Public Affairs Manager Public Works Projects Manager Public Works Supervisor Recreation Manager Recreation Supervisor Senior Accountant Senior Assistant City Attorney Senior Civil Engineer Senior Management Analyst Service Center Superintendent Sustainability Manager Transportation Manager Web Specialist 11/19/19 161 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 3 In the event of any inconsistency between the Compensation Program and any Employment Contracts, the provisions of the Employment Contract and any amendments thereto control. Adopted by Action of the City Council, April 1, 1974 Revised 10/74, 3/78, 6/81, 6/82, 7/85, 7/87, 1/89, 7/90, 4/91, 5/91, 7/92, 6/95, 6/96, 7/99, 6/02, 7/04, 6/05, 04/07, 7/10, 10/12, 12/12, 7/13,11/13,12/13,3/14, 7/14, 11/15, 6/16, 10/16, 11/16, 6/17, 10/17, 7/19 11/19/19 162 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 4 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 2 SALARY SCHEDULE AND OTHER SALARY RATES It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be compensated for services rendered to and on behalf of the City on the basis of equitably of pay for duties and responsibilities assigned, meritorious service and comparability with similar work in other public and private employment in the same labor market; all of which is contingent upon the City’s ability to pay consistent with its fiscal policies. a. Effective the first full pay period after City Council adoption, a 4% salary increase will be added to the salary range of each classification in this unit. b. Effective the first full pay period in July 2020, a 3.5% salary increase will be added to the salary range of each classification in this unit. c. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, a 3% salary increase will be added to the salary range of each classification in this unit. See Attachment A for a list of paygrades. In addition, equity adjustments as identified in the City’s 2019 total compensation survey shall occur per Attachment B. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 Revised 8/78, 7/79, 6/80, 7/92, 6/95, 10/12, 7/13, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 163 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 5 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 3 TRAINING AND CONFERENCES I. POLICY A. Management Personnel It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be reimbursed or receive advances in accordance with the schedules, terms and conditions as set forth herein for attendance at conferences, meetings and training sessions as defined below for each. It is the intent of this policy to encourage the continuing education and awareness of said persons in the technical improvements and innovations in their fields of endeavor as they apply to the City or to implement a City approved strategy for attracting and retaining businesses in the City. One means of implementing this encouragement is through a formal reimbursement and advance schedule for authorized attendance at such conferences, meetings and training sessions. B. Non-Management Personnel When authorized by their supervisor, a non-management person may attend a conference, meeting or training session subject to the stated terms and conditions included herein for each with payment toward or reimbursement of certain expenses incurred as defined below for each. II DEFINITIONS A. Conferences A conference is an annual meeting of a work related organization the membership of which may be held in the name of the City or the individual. B. Local Area The local area is defined to be within Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties and within a 40- mile distance from Cupertino when traveling to Alameda County. C. Meetings A “meeting” shall mean a convention, conference, seminar, workshop, meal, or like assembly having to do with municipal government operations. An employee serving on a panel for interviews of job applicants shall not come under this definition. 11/19/19 164 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 6 D. Training Session A training session is any type of seminar or workshop the attendance at which is for the purpose of obtaining information of a work related nature to benefit the City’s operations or to enhance the attendee’s capabilities in the discharge of assigned duties and responsibilities. III REIMBURSEMENT AND ADVANCE PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Intent This schedule is written with the intent that the employee will make every effort to find the lowest possible cost to the City for traveling on City business. For example, if paying for parking at the airport is less expensive that paying for a taxi or airport shuttle, then the employee should drive their car and park at the airport; or if renting a car is lower than taking taxis at the out-of-town location, then a car should be rented; or air reservations should be booked in advance to obtain discounted fares. The following procedures apply whether the expense is being paid through a reimbursement or a direct advance. B. Registration Registration fees for authorized attendance at a meeting or training session will be paid by the City. C. Transportation The City will pay transportation costs on the basis of the lowest cost intent stated in paragraph A. Eligible transportation costs include airfare (with coach fare being the maximum), van or taxi service to and from the attendee’s home and airport, destination or airport parking charges, taxi and shuttle services at the out-of-town location, trains, tolls, or rental cars. Use of a personal automobile for City business shall be reimbursed or advanced at the rate per mile in effect for such use, except in no case shall it exceed air coach fare if the vehicle is being used for getting to the destination. Government or group rates offered by a provider of transportation must be used when available. Reimbursement or advances for use of a personal automobile on City business within a local area will not be made so as to supplement that already being paid to those persons receiving a monthly mileage allowance. D. Lodging Hotel or lodging expenses of the employee resulting from the authorized event or activity defined in this policy will be reimbursed or advanced if the lodging and event occurs outside of the local area. Not covered will be lodging expenses related to person(s) who are accompanying the City member, but who themselves are not on City business. In this 11/19/19 165 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 7 instance, for example, the difference between single and multiple occupancy rates for a room will not be reimbursed. Where the lodging is in connection with a conference or other organized educational activity, City-paid lodging costs shall not exceed the maximum group rate published by the conference or activity sponsor, providing that lodging at the group rate is available at the time of booking. If the group rate at the conference hotel is not available, then the non-conference lodging policy described in the next paragraph should be followed to find another comparable hotel. Where lodging is necessary for an activity that is not related to a conference or other organized educational activity, reimbursement or advances shall be limited to the actual cost of the room at a group or government rate. In the event that a group or government rate is not available, lodging rates that do not exceed the median price for lodging for that area and time period listed on travel websites like www.hotels.com, www.expedia.com or an equivalent service shall be eligible for reimbursement or advancement. E. Meals 1. With No Conference Payments toward or reimbursement of meals related to authorized activities or events shall be at the Internal Revenue Service per diem rate for meals and incidental expenses for a given location, as stated by IRS publications 463 and 1542 and by the U.S. General Services Administration. The per diem shall be split among meals as reasonably desired and reduced accordingly for less than full travel days. If per diem is claimed, no receipts are necessary. Alternatively, the actual cost of a meal can be claimed, within a standard of reasonableness, but receipts must be kept and submitted for the expense incurred. 2. As Part of a Conference When City personnel are attending a conference or other organized educational activity, they shall be reimbursed or advanced for meals not provided by the activity, on a per diem or actual cost basis. The per diem and actual cost rate shall follow the rules described in the meals with no conference paragraph. F. Other Expenses Payments toward or reimbursement of expenses at such functions shall be limited to the actual costs consistent with the application of reasonable standards. Other reasonable expenses related to business purposes shall be paid consistent with this policy. No payments shall be made unless, where available, receipts are kept and submitted for all expenses incurred. When receipts are not available, qualifying expenditures shall be reimbursed upon signing of an affidavit of expenditure. 11/19/19 166 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 8 No payment shall be made for any expenses incurred which are of a personal nature or not within a standard of reasonableness for the situation as may be defined by the Finance Department. G. Non-Reimbursable Expenses The City will not reimburse or advance payment toward expenses including, but not limited to: 1. The personal portion of any trip; 2. Political or charitable contributions or events; 3. Family expenses, including those of a partner when accompanying the employee on City- related business, as well as child or pet-related expenses; 4. Entertainment expenses, including theatre, shows, movies, sporting events, golf, spa treatments, etc. 5. Gifts of any kind for any purpose; 6. Service club meals; of those besides economic development staff; 7. Alcoholic beverages; 8. Non-mileage personal automobile expenses including repairs, insurance, gasoline, traffic citations; and 9. Personal losses incurred while on City business. IV ATTENDANCE AUTHORIZATION A. Budgetary Limitations Notwithstanding any attendance authorization contained herein, reimbursement or advances for expenses relative to conferences, meeting or training sessions shall not exceed the budgetary limitations. B. Conference Attendance Attendance at conferences or seminars by employees must be approved by their supervisor. C. Meetings Any employee, management or non-management, may attend a meeting when authorized by their supervisor. D. Training Sessions 11/19/19 167 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 9 Any employee, management or non-management, may attend a training session when authorized by their supervisor. V. FUNDING A. Appropriation Policy It shall be the policy of the City to appropriate funds subject to availability of resources. B. Training Sessions Payments toward or reimbursement of expenses incurred in attendance at training sessions, will be appropriated annually through the budget process. VI. DIRECT CASH ADVANCE POLICY From time to time, it may be necessary for a City employee to request a direct cash advance to cover anticipated expenses while traveling or doing business on the City’s behalf. Such request for an advance should be submitted to their supervisor no less than seven days prior to the need for the advance with the following information: 1) Purpose of the expenditure; 2) The anticipated amount of the expenditure (for example, hotel rates, meal costs, and transportation expenses); and 3) The dates of the expenditure. An accounting of expenses and return of any unused advance must be reported to the City within 30 calendar days of the employee’s return on the expense report described in Section VII. VII. EXPENSE REPORT REQUIREMENTS All expense reimbursement requests or final accounting of advances received must be approved by their supervisor, on forms determined by the Finance Department, within 30 calendar days of an expense incurred, and accompanied by a business purpose for all expenditures and a receipt for each non- per diem item. Revised 7/83, 7/85, 7/87, 7/88, 7/91, 7/92, 12/07,7/10 11/19/19 168 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 10 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 4 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCES AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be compensated fairly for the use of personal automotive vehicles on City business. In many instances the use of personal vehicles is a condition of employment due to the absence of sufficient City owned vehicles for general transportation purposes. It is not intended, however, that such a condition of employment should work an undue hardship. For this reason, the following policies shall apply for mileage reimbursements. Those persons who occasionally are required to use their personal automobiles for City business shall be reimbursed for such use at an appropriate rate established by the City Council. Submission of reimbursement requests must be approved by the Department Head. Employees in the following classifications shall be paid on a monthly basis the following automobile allowance: Classification Allowance Director of Administrative Services 300.00 Director of Community Development 300.00 Assistant City Manager 300.00 Director of Recreation and Community Services 300.00 Director of Public Works 300.00 Chief Technology Officer/ 300.00 Director of Information Services City Clerk 250.00 Senior Civil Engineer 250.00 Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer 250.00 Transportation Manager 250.00 Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services 200.00 Public Affairs Manager 200.00 Deputy City Manager 200.00 Recreation Supervisor 200.00 Recreation Manager 200.00 Employees receiving automobile allowance shall be eligible for reimbursement for travel that exceeds two hundred miles round trip. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 11/19/19 169 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 11 Revised 7/74, 5/79, 6/80, 7/81, 8/84, 7/87, 1/89, 7/90,7/92, 6/96, 8/99, 6/00, 9/01, 1/02, 6/02, 10/07, 7/10, 7/11, 10/12, 12/12, 7/13, 11/15, 10/16, 11/16, 6/17, 7/19 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 5 ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS AND PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be entitled to City sponsored association memberships as well as receiving subscriptions to professional and technical publications. Such sponsorship, however, shall be conditioned upon the several factors as set forth below. Each association for which membership is claimed must be directly related to the field of endeavor of the person to be benefited. Each claim for City sponsored membership shall be submitted by or through the Department Head with their concurrence to the City Manager for approval. Subscriptions to or purchase of professional and technical publications may be provided at City expense when such have been authorized by the Department Head providing the subject matter and material generally contained therein are related to municipal governmental operations. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 Revised 7/92 11/19/19 170 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 12 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 6 OVERTIME WORKED EXEMPT POSITIONS: Management and non-represented professional employees are ineligible for overtime payments for time worked in excess of what otherwise would be considered as a normal work day or work week for other employees. However, no deduction from leave balances are made when such an employee is absent for less than a regular work day as long as the employee has his/her supervisor’s approval. Nothing in this policy precludes the alternative work schedule, which may include an absence of a full eight hour day, when forty hours have been worked in the same seven day work period. NON-EXEMPT POSITIONS: Confidential employees are eligible for overtime or compensation time, at their discretion, for the time worked in excess of 40 hours per week. Nothing in this policy precludes the alternative work schedule, which may include an absence of a full eight hour day, where forty hours have been worked in the same seven day period. COMPENSATORY TIME OFF At the employee’s discretion, compensatory time (CTO) may be granted for overtime worked at the rate of time and one-half for each hour worked in lieu of compensation in cash. Employees, who have previously earned CTO, shall be allowed to schedule CTO at the employee’s discretion provided (1) that prior supervisory approval has been obtained and (2) the request is made in writing. CTO may be accrued for up to 80 hours per calendar year. Any CTO earned exceeding 80 hours will be paid at the rate of time and one-half. An employee may carry over the unused balance into the next calendar year. Any unused carryover balance will be automatically paid out at the end of the calendar year. An employee may exercise his/her option twice each calendar year to convert any/or all accumulated compensatory time to cash. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 Revised 6/80, 7/91, 7/92, 6/96, 7/97, 4/07, 7/13, 10/16 11/19/19 171 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 13 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 7 HEALTH BENEFITS PLAN - EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide group hospital and medical insurance under which employees in Management and Confidential positions and their dependents may be covered. The purpose of this program is to promote and preserve the health of employees and their families through comprehensive health plans available only through employer sponsorship. Although the premium cost for the insurance provided remains the ultimate responsibility of the employee in these positions, the City shall contribute the amounts listed below towards the premium or pay the full cost of the premium if less than the stated amounts. If the premium amounts for any employee covered by this policy are less than the amounts listed below per month, the difference between the premium amount and the stated amounts will be included in the employee’s gross pay. Effective January 1, 2020 City Max Health Contribution City Max *Dental Contribution City Total Max Contribution Employee 848.87 126.78 975.65 Employee +1 1,443.09 126.78 1,569.87 Employee +2 1,876.01 126.78 2,002.79 January 1, 2021 City Max Health Contribution City Max *Dental Contribution City Total Max Contribution Employee 891.32 126.78 1,018.10 Employee +1 1,515.24 126.78 1,642.02 Employee +2 1,969.81 126.78 2,096.59 January 1, 2022 City Max Health Contribution City Max *Dental Contribution City Total Max Contribution Employee 935.88 126.78 1,062.66 Employee +1 1,591.01 126.78 1,717.79 Employee +2 2,068.31 126.78 2,195.09 Health In Lieu Payments The City shall provide a payment of $375 per month in lieu of health care premiums, for Appointed employees who provide proof of alternate coverage. This payment shall be in the form of a contribution to the employee’s deferred compensation plan. 11/19/19 172 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 14 *Dental Coverage: Effective the first month after Council adoption of MOU, dental coverage is capped at $2,500.00 per dependent per annual plan year for the term of this contract. Adopted by Action of the City Council September 16, 1974 Revised 7/75, 7/76, 7/77, 8/78, 7/79, 6/80, 6/81, 7/81, 6/82, 7/83, 7/84, 7/88, 7/89, 7/90, 7/91, 7/92, 6/95, 7/97, 7/99, 6/00, 6/02, 7/04, 6/05, 4/07,12/12, 7/13, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 173 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 15 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 8 FIXED HOLIDAYS It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to recognize days of historical and national significance as holidays of the City without loss of pay or benefits. Recognizing the desirable times throughout the year, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide days off in lieu of holidays for management and confidential employees at such times as are convenient for each employee and supervisor, when such policy is compatible with the workload and schedule of the City. The City provides the following fixed paid holidays for eligible employees covered by this agreement: 1. New Year’s Day 2. Martin Luther King Day 3. Presidents’ Day 4. Memorial Day 5. Independence day 6. Labor Day 7. Veteran’s Day 8. Thanksgiving Day 9. Day Following Thanksgiving 10. Christmas Eve 11. Christmas Day 12. New Year’s Eve When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as the non-work day. When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the previous Friday shall be observed as the non-work day. FLOATING HOLIDAY In addition to the paid holidays, employees occupying these positions shall be provided 20 floating hours per calendar year as non-work time with full pay and benefits. Employees may accumulate floating holiday hours up to two times their annual accrual. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1975 Revised 6/80, 6/89, 7/92, 7/99, 7/13 11/19/19 174 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 16 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 9 LIFE, LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE, AND SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to make available group insurance for Management and Confidential employees that will mitigate the personal and family financial hardships resulting from continuing disability that prevents an employee from performing gainfully in his or her occupation. It is further the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide life insurance benefits in an amount of two and one half times the employee’s annual salary to a maximum of $250,000.00. Employees occupying unrepresented positions may enroll in the disability income program and the life insurance program offered if eligible under the contract provisions of the policy and the personnel rules of the City. The full cost of premiums for these programs shall be paid by the City for such employees. Adopted by Action of the City Council September 16, 1976 Revised 7/76, 6/80, 6/81, 6/82, 6/92, 10/16 11/19/19 175 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 17 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 10 DEFERRED COMPENSATION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide equitable current compensation and reasonable retirement security for management and confidential employees for services performed for the City. The City participates in the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and deferred compensation plans have been established. Both the employee and employer may make contributions from current earnings to these plans. The purpose of this policy is to promote means by which compensation may be provided in such manner and form to best meet the requirements of the City and the needs of individual employees, thereby increasing the ability, to attract and retain competent management and confidential employees. The City shall maintain and administer means by which employees in these positions may defer portions of their current earnings for future utilization. Usage of such plans shall be subject to such agreements, rules and procedures as are necessary to properly administer each plan. Employee contributions to such plans may be made in such amounts as felt proper and necessary to the employee. Employer contributions shall be as determined by the City Council. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1975 Revised 6/80, 7/87, 7/92, 7/99 11/19/19 176 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 18 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 11 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM CONTRIBUTION A. Employees hired on or before December 29, 2012 Only: For employees hired on or before December 29, 2012, the City has contracted with CalPERS for a 2.7% @55 formula. Effective in the first full pay period in July 2017, each employee shall pay the full 8.0% of applicable salary of the employee’s contribution towards CalPERS. B. For Employees hired by the City of Cupertino on December 30, 2012 or December 31, 2012 or a current CalPERS employee who qualifies as a classic member under CalPERS Regulations Only: For Employees hired by the City of Cupertino on December 30, 2012 or December 31, 2012 or a current CalPERS employee who qualifies as a classic member under CalPERS Regulations only the City has contracted with CalPERS for a 2.0% @ 60 retirement formula, three year average compensation. EffectiveOctober 1, 2016, the City shall not pay the employee’s contribution rate to the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and each employee shall pay the full 7% of applicable salary of the employee’s contribution towards CalPERS. C. For new employees hired by the City of Cupertino on or after January 1, 2013 and do not qualify as Classic members Only: For new employees hired by the City of Cupertino on or after January 1, 2013 and do not qualify as classic members as defined by CalPERS, CalPERS has by statute implemented a 2% @ 62 formula, three year average and employees in this category shall pay 50% of the normal cost rate as determined by CalPERS. Adopted by Action of the City Council June, 1981 Revised 6/87, 6/89, 7/90, 7/91, 7/92, 6/03, 7/04, 4/07, 7/10, 10/12, 12/12, 7/13, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 177 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 19 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 12 DENTAL INSURANCE - EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide dental insurance under which employees in Management and Confidential positions and their dependents may be covered. The purpose of this program is to promote and preserve the health of employees. The premium cost for the insurance provided by the City shall not exceed $126.78* per month per employee. Enrollment in the plan or plans made available pursuant to this policy shall be in accordance with Personnel Rules of the City and the provisions of the contract for such insurance between the City and carrier or carriers. *Dental Coverage: Effective the first month after Council adoption of agreement, dental coverage is capped at $2,500.00 per dependent per annual plan year for the term of this contract. Adopted by Action of City Council July 1, 1983 Revised 7/87, 7/88, 7/89, 7/90, 7/91, 7/92, 6/95, 7/99, 4/07, 10/12, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 178 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 20 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 13 ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE The department heads shall receive eighty (80) hours of administrative leave with pay per year. Unrepresented employees exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act shall receive forty (40) hours of administrative leave with pay per year. Employees may accumulate administrative leave hours up to two times their annual accrual. Employees shall be eligible to convert administrative leave hours to pay one time each calendar year. Adopted by Action of the City Council July, 1988 Revised 7/92, 7/97, 7/99, 7/10, 12/12, 10/16 11/19/19 179 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 21 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 14 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide an Employee Assistance Program for the benefit of Management and Confidential employees and their eligible dependents. The purpose of this program is to provide professional assistance and counseling concerning financial, legal, pre-retirement, and other matters of a personal nature. Adopted by Action of the City Council June 17, 1996 11/19/19 180 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 22 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 15 VACATION ACCUMULATION The department heads shall earn vacation hours under the same vacation accumulation schedule as all other employees. Credit shall be provided for previous public sector service time on a year-for-year basis as to annual vacation accumulation. Credit shall only be given for completed years of service. Public service credit shall not apply to any other supplemental benefit. Employee(s) affected by this policy will have the responsibility of providing certification as to previous public sector service. Benefited full-time employees accrue vacation in accordance with the following schedule. Benefited employees who work less than a full-time work schedule accrue vacation in accordance with the following schedule on a pro-rated basis. Service Time Annual Accruals Maximum Accrual 0 - 3 Years 80 Hours 160 Hours 4 - 9 Years 120 Hours 240 Hours 10 – 14 Years 160 Hours 272 Hours 15 – 19 Years 176 Hours 320 Hours 20 + Years 192 Hours 352 Hours An employee may accrue no more vacation credit than what is listed above. VACATION CREDITS The hiring manager, with the approval of the department head and the City Manager, may offer a vacation bank of up to 120 hours of vacation to a prospective candidate in the Unrepresented group. These hours do not vest for payoff purposes if the employee leaves service. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1997 Revised 6/99, 7/10, 12/12, 7/13, 10/16 11/19/19 181 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 23 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 16 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Housing assistance may be offered to the department heads pursuant to Resolution No. 15-092. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1997 Revised 7/99, 7/10, 8/12, 10/15 11/19/19 182 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 24 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 17 VISION INSURANCE – EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide vision insurance under which employees and their dependents may be covered. The purpose of this program is to promote and preserve the health of employees. The premium cost for the insurance provided by the City shall not exceed $14.94 per month per employee. Enrollment in the plan or plans made available pursuant to this policy shall be in accordance with the provisions of the contract between the City and carrier or carriers providing vision insurance coverage, Adopted by Action of the City Council July 1997 Revised 7/99, 6/02, 6/03, 7/10, 10/12 11/19/19 183 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 25 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 18 WORK OUT OF CLASSIFICATION/WORK IN DUAL CLASSIFICATION Work Out of Classification – Temporary assignment, approved in advance by the department head, to a classification in a higher pay grade shall be compensated at the Step 1 rate of the higher classification or at a rate five (5) percent greater than that of the regular position, whichever is greater, for the number of hours assigned. In order to qualify for out-of-classification pay, an employee shall work a minimum of four (4) hours per day in the temporary assignment. An employee may be assigned to work out of class in a higher classification when there is a vacant position for which a recruitment is being, or will be, conducted. Out of class assignments may not exceed 960 hours in a fiscal year. Compensation for work performed in an out-of-class capacity is included for purposes of calculating CalPERS compensation, however, this is at the discretion of CalPERS and future changes to CalPERS regulations would supersede the language of this section. An employee may receive acting pay for working in a higher classification where a vacancy does not exist, in the case of an incumbent being on vacation or leave of absence, or due to the employee being asked to perform higher level work on any other temporary basis. Acting pay is not included for purposes of calculating CalPERS compensation. The higher rate of pay shall be used in computing overtime when authorized overtime is worked in a non-exempt, out of class or acting work assignment. When a non-exempt employee is working out of class or acting in an exempt position for 20 hours or more in a work week, the employee will be ineligible to receive overtime pay for any and all hours worked in the exempt classification during that work week. All requests for out of class pay or acting pay must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services or his/her designee. Work in Dual Classifications – The City Manager may, in his or her sole discretion, grant a pay differential up to five percent (5%) above the higher base salary to an employee assigned by the City Manager to perform all of the duties of another position in addition to the employee’s regular duties, provided that a differential of dual assignments under this provision shall only be paid where the additional assignment is to a position equivalent to the level of the employee’s regular position in a different department or division than the employee’s regular classification, the duration of the additional assignment is for a period of one or more months, and the published base salary for the equivalent level position is the same or lower than the published salary for the 11/19/19 184 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 26 employee’s current classification such that the employee does not quality for working out of class pay. Adopted by Action of the City Council October 2016 Revised 7/19 11/19/19 185 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 27 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 19 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM It is the intent of the City to recognize the value of continuing education and professional development of its employees; and to adopt an Education Reimbursement Program which will encourage employees to avail themselves of City job related educational opportunities that will advance their knowledge and interests in the direction of their career path. Courses should either: a) maintain or improve job skills in the employee’s current position; b) be expressly required by the City or by law; or c) prepare the employee to become a competitive applicant for a different position with the City. The Education Reimbursement Program is a benefit to all full time benefited employees who have completed the required probationary period and provides education reimbursement of up to two thousand dollars($2,000) per calendar year for the cost of registration, required textbooks and/or materials and parking. Employees who wish to seek reimbursement from the City for educational program costs shall provide a written request for reimbursement in advance of enrollment to the Human Resources Division. The form provided shall include the type of training, sponsoring organization or institution, meeting times and costs. Human Resources and the employee’s department head will make the determination if the chosen education program is eligible for reimbursement. No employee shall receive any reimbursement until they have provided satisfactory proof of successful completion of the coursework with a grade of “C” or above, or “Pass” in the case of a Pass/Fail course. Such proof of completion shall be provided within 30 days of the conclusion of the course. Education reimbursement is a taxable benefit under IRS Code. Education reimbursement will be applied to the calendar year in which the course is passed and satisfactory proof of completion is submitted. Mandatory or annual coursework, attendance at conferences and training required to maintain job specific certifications or proficiencies are not included in the Education Reimbursement Program. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 2019 11/19/19 186 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 28 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 20 CITY SPONSORED RECREATION AND WELLNESS PROGRAMS Unrepresented employees shall have the privilege of enrollment in City sponsored recreation programs at the City residents’ fee structure and in preference to non-residents wishing to enroll. Each calendar year, employees and family members on the employee’s dental plan are eligible to be reimbursed up to $500 per employee in Rec Bucks. Employees shall be reimbursed for approved recreation services in accordance with the City’s Recreation Buck Policies. Programs allowing for preregistration will be reimbursed after completion of the program, including those allowing for or requiring preregistration in the calendar year prior to reimbursement. Reimbursements shall be applied to the year in which they are received. Benefited employees will also receive a free employee-only annual Cupertino Sports Center membership. Part-time benefited employees will have the annual amount of Recreation Bucks prorated based on number of hours worked. Recreation Bucks are a taxable benefit under IRS Code, and must be used by the employee within the calendar year and are non-transferrable. City employees are eligible to participate in the City’s wellness program as provided for in the City’s Administrative Rules and Regulations. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 2019 11/19/19 187 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 29 City of Cupertino Listing of Unrepresented Classifications by Salary Rate or Pay Grades Effective July 1, 2013 (Res. No. 13-061) Amended 11/19/13 (Res. No. 13-099) Amended 12/17/13 (Res. No. 13-108) Amended 3/18/14 (Res. No. 14-130) Amended 11/3/14 (Res. No. 14-209) Amended 11/3/2015 (Res. No. 15-099 ) Amended 6/21/16 (Res. No. 16- ) Amended 10/4/16 (Res. No. ) Amended 10/18/16 (Res. No. ) Amended 11/15/16 (Res. No. ) Amended 6/20/17 (Res. No. ) Amended 10/17/17 (Res. No. ) Amended 7/16/19 (Res. No. ) Amended 11/19/19 (Res. No. ) 11/19/19 188 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 30 ATTACHMENT A SALARY SCHEDULE Salary Effective First Full Pay Period after Council Adoption – Amended November 19, 2019 Classification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT I $ 40.23 $ 42.24 $ 44.35 $ 46.57 $ 48.89 ACCOUNTANT II $ 44.34 $ 46.56 $ 48.89 $ 51.34 $ 53.90 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 39.90 $ 41.89 $ 43.99 $ 46.19 $ 48.50 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 35.09 $ 36.84 $ 38.69 $ 40.62 $ 42.65 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 80.13 $ 84.14 $ 88.34 $ 92.76 $ 97.40 ASSISTANT CITY MGR $ 106.67 $ 112.01 $ 117.61 $ 123.49 $ 129.66 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 61.24 $ 64.30 $ 67.51 $ 70.89 $ 74.43 ASST DIR COMM DEV/BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 76.32 $ 80.13 $ 84.14 $ 88.35 $ 92.76 ASST DIR PARKS AND RECREATION $ 76.32 $ 80.13 $ 84.14 $ 88.35 $ 92.76 ASST DIR PUBLIC WORKS/ $ 79.40 $ 83.36 $ 87.53 $ 91.91 $ 96.51 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST $ 52.03 $ 54.63 $ 57.36 $ 60.23 $ 63.24 CAPITAL IMPV PROGRAM MGR $ 66.16 $ 69.46 $ 72.94 $ 76.58 $ 80.41 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 CITY CLERK $ 61.94 $ 65.04 $ 68.29 $ 71.71 $ 75.29 CITY ENGINEER $ 79.40 $ 83.36 $ 87.53 $ 91.91 $ 96.51 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR $ 40.45 $ 42.47 $ 44.60 $ 46.83 $ 49.17 DEPARTMENT HEAD $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 61.99 $ 65.08 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.34 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $ 57.66 $ 60.54 $ 63.57 $ 66.74 $ 70.08 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $ 44.20 $ 46.41 $ 48.73 $ 51.17 $ 53.73 11/19/19 189 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 31 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER $ 72.60 $ 76.24 $ 80.05 $ 84.05 $ 88.25 DIRECTOR OF ADMIN SERVICES $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DIRECTOR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $ 96.98 $ 101.82 $ 106.92 $ 112.26 $ 117.88 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER $ 68.18 $ 71.59 $ 75.17 $ 78.93 $ 82.87 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $ 55.69 $ 58.48 $ 61.40 $ 64.47 $ 67.69 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $ 61.64 $ 64.72 $ 67.96 $ 71.36 $ 74.92 EXEC ASST TO CITY MANAGER $ 41.23 $ 43.29 $ 45.46 $ 47.73 $ 50.12 EXEC ASST TO THE CITY ATTNY $ 40.22 $ 42.23 $ 44.35 $ 46.56 $ 48.89 FINANCE MANAGER $ 70.54 $ 74.06 $ 77.77 $ 81.65 $ 85.74 GIS PROGRAM MANAGER $ 68.64 $ 72.07 $ 75.67 $ 79.46 $ 83.43 HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST I $ 48.15 $ 50.55 $ 53.08 $ 55.74 $ 58.52 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 53.08 $ 55.74 $ 58.52 $ 61.45 $ 64.52 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT $ 29.14 $ 30.60 $ 32.13 $ 33.73 $ 35.42 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 70.54 $ 74.06 $ 77.77 $ 81.65 $ 85.74 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 39.90 $ 41.89 $ 43.99 $ 46.19 $ 48.50 I.T. ASSISTANT $ 39.24 $ 41.20 $ 43.26 $ 45.42 $ 47.69 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - APPLICATIONS $ 68.64 $ 72.07 $ 75.67 $ 79.46 $ 83.43 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - INFRASTRUCTURE $ 68.64 $ 72.07 $ 75.67 $ 79.46 $ 83.43 LEGAL SERVICES MANAGER $ 41.54 $ 43.61 $ 45.80 $ 48.08 $ 50.49 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 48.56 $ 50.99 $ 53.54 $ 56.21 $ 59.03 NETWORK SPECIALIST $ 50.20 $ 52.71 $ 55.34 $ 58.11 $ 61.02 PARK RESTORATION IMPV MGR $ 66.16 $ 69.46 $ 72.94 $ 76.58 $ 80.41 11/19/19 190 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 32 PERMIT CENTER MANAGER $ 61.99 $ 65.08 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.34 PLANNING MANAGER $ 68.91 $ 72.36 $ 75.97 $ 79.77 $ 83.76 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER $ 60.30 $ 63.32 $ 66.48 $ 69.81 $ 73.30 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER $ 61.24 $ 64.30 $ 67.51 $ 70.89 $ 74.43 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MANAGER $ 58.15 $ 61.06 $ 64.11 $ 67.32 $ 70.68 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR $ 50.48 $ 53.00 $ 55.65 $ 58.44 $ 61.36 RECREATION MANAGER $ 51.80 $ 54.38 $ 57.10 $ 59.96 $ 62.96 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $ 46.98 $ 49.33 $ 51.80 $ 54.38 $ 57.10 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 51.34 $ 53.91 $ 56.60 $ 59.43 $ 62.40 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 88.15 $ 92.56 $ 97.19 $ 102.05 $ 107.15 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 68.76 $ 72.20 $ 75.81 $ 79.60 $ 83.58 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 53.08 $ 55.74 $ 58.52 $ 61.45 $ 64.52 SERVICE CENTER SUPERINTENDENT $ 64.10 $ 67.30 $ 70.67 $ 74.20 $ 77.91 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER $ 61.64 $ 64.72 $ 67.96 $ 71.36 $ 74.92 TRANSPORTATION MANAGER $ 73.21 $ 76.87 $ 80.71 $ 84.75 $ 88.98 WEB SPECIALIST $ 44.38 $ 46.60 $ 48.93 $ 51.38 $ 53.95 Salary Effective First Full Pay Period in July 2020 – Amended November 19, 2019 Classification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT I $ 41.63 $ 43.71 $ 45.90 $ 48.20 $ 50.61 ACCOUNTANT II $ 45.90 $ 48.19 $ 50.60 $ 53.13 $ 55.79 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 41.30 $ 43.36 $ 45.53 $ 47.81 $ 50.19 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 36.32 $ 38.13 $ 40.04 $ 42.04 $ 44.14 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 82.94 $ 87.08 $ 91.44 $ 96.01 $ 100.81 ASSISTANT CITY MGR $ 113.39 $ 119.06 $ 125.01 $ 131.26 $ 137.82 11/19/19 191 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 33 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 65.09 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.35 $ 79.12 ASST DIR COMM DEV/BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 81.12 $ 85.18 $ 89.44 $ 93.91 $ 98.60 ASST DIR PUBLIC WORKS $ 84.39 $ 88.61 $ 93.04 $ 97.70 $ 102.58 ASST DIR PARKS AND RECREATION $ 81.12 $ 85.18 $ 89.44 $ 93.91 $ 98.60 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST $ 56.55 $ 59.37 $ 62.34 $ 65.46 $ 68.73 CAPITAL IMPV PROGRAM MGR $ 70.87 $ 74.41 $ 78.13 $ 82.04 $ 86.14 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 CITY CLERK $ 67.32 $ 70.68 $ 74.22 $ 77.93 $ 81.82 CITY ENGINEER $ 84.39 $ 88.61 $ 93.04 $ 97.70 $ 102.58 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR $ 41.87 $ 43.96 $ 46.16 $ 48.47 $ 50.89 DEPARTMENT HEAD $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 65.95 $ 69.25 $ 72.71 $ 76.35 $ 80.16 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $ 59.67 $ 62.66 $ 65.79 $ 69.08 $ 72.54 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $ 48.03 $ 50.44 $ 52.96 $ 55.61 $ 58.39 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER $ 77.18 $ 81.03 $ 85.09 $ 89.34 $ 93.81 DIRECTOR OF ADMIN SERVICES $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DIRECTOR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $ 103.08 $ 108.23 $ 113.65 $ 119.33 $ 125.29 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER $ 72.82 $ 76.47 $ 80.29 $ 84.30 $ 88.52 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $ 59.20 $ 62.16 $ 65.26 $ 68.53 $ 71.95 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $ 66.99 $ 70.34 $ 73.85 $ 77.55 $ 81.42 EXEC ASST TO CITY MANAGER $ 42.67 $ 44.81 $ 47.05 $ 49.40 $ 51.87 EXEC ASST TO THE CITY ATTNY $ 41.62 $ 43.71 $ 45.90 $ 48.19 $ 50.60 11/19/19 192 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 34 FINANCE MANAGER $ 75.85 $ 79.65 $ 83.63 $ 87.81 $ 92.20 GIS PROGRAM MANAGER $ 74.59 $ 78.32 $ 82.24 $ 86.35 $ 90.67 HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST I $ 50.08 $ 52.59 $ 55.21 $ 57.98 $ 60.87 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.87 $ 63.92 $ 67.11 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT $ 30.16 $ 31.67 $ 33.25 $ 34.91 $ 36.66 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 75.85 $ 79.65 $ 83.63 $ 87.81 $ 92.20 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 41.30 $ 43.36 $ 45.53 $ 47.81 $ 50.19 I.T. ASSISTANT $ 40.61 $ 42.64 $ 44.77 $ 47.01 $ 49.36 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - INFRASTRUCTURE $ 74.59 $ 78.32 $ 82.24 $ 86.35 $ 90.67 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - APPLICATIONS $ 74.59 $ 78.32 $ 82.24 $ 86.35 $ 90.67 LEGAL SERVICES MANAGER $ 42.99 $ 45.14 $ 47.40 $ 49.77 $ 52.26 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 50.51 $ 53.04 $ 55.69 $ 58.47 $ 61.40 NETWORK SPECIALIST $ 51.95 $ 54.55 $ 57.28 $ 60.14 $ 63.15 PARK RESTORATION IMPV MGR $ 70.87 $ 74.41 $ 78.13 $ 82.04 $ 86.14 PERMIT CENTER MANAGER $ 65.95 $ 69.25 $ 72.71 $ 76.35 $ 80.16 PLANNING MANAGER $ 74.89 $ 78.63 $ 82.56 $ 86.69 $ 91.03 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER $ 65.16 $ 68.42 $ 71.84 $ 75.43 $ 79.20 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER $ 65.09 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.35 $ 79.12 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MANAGER $ 62.29 $ 65.41 $ 68.68 $ 72.11 $ 75.72 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR $ 52.51 $ 55.13 $ 57.89 $ 60.79 $ 63.82 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $ 48.62 $ 51.06 $ 53.61 $ 56.29 $ 59.10 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 53.14 $ 55.79 $ 58.58 $ 61.51 $ 64.59 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 91.24 $ 95.80 $ 100.59 $ 105.62 $ 110.90 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 71.17 $ 74.72 $ 78.46 $ 82.38 $ 86.50 11/19/19 193 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 35 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.88 $ 63.92 $ 67.11 SERVICE CENTER SUPERINTENDENT $ 67.14 $ 70.50 $ 74.02 $ 77.72 $ 81.61 RECREATION MANAGER $ 53.61 $ 56.29 $ 59.10 $ 62.06 $ 65.16 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER $ 66.99 $ 70.34 $ 73.85 $ 77.55 $ 81.42 TRANSPORTATION MANAGER $ 75.77 $ 79.56 $ 83.54 $ 87.71 $ 92.10 WEB SPECIALIST $ 45.94 $ 48.23 $ 50.65 $ 53.18 $ 55.84 Salary Effective First Full Pay Period in July 2021 – Amended November 19, 2019 Classification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT I $ 42.88 $ 45.03 $ 47.28 $ 49.64 $ 52.12 ACCOUNTANT II $ 47.27 $ 49.64 $ 52.12 $ 54.73 $ 57.46 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 42.53 $ 44.66 $ 46.89 $ 49.24 $ 51.70 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 37.41 $ 39.28 $ 41.24 $ 43.30 $ 45.47 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 85.42 $ 89.70 $ 94.18 $ 98.89 $ 103.83 ASSISTANT CITY MGR $ 116.79 $ 122.63 $ 128.76 $ 135.20 $ 141.96 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 68.72 $ 72.15 $ 75.76 $ 79.55 $ 83.53 ASST DIR COMM DEV/BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 83.55 $ 87.73 $ 92.12 $ 96.72 $ 101.56 ASST DIR PUBLIC WORKS/ $ 86.92 $ 91.27 $ 95.83 $ 100.63 $ 105.66 ASST DIR PARKS AND RECREATION $ 83.55 $ 87.73 $ 92.12 $ 96.72 $ 101.56 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST $ 60.63 $ 63.66 $ 66.84 $ 70.19 $ 73.70 CAPITAL IMPV PROGRAM MGR $ 72.99 $ 76.64 $ 80.48 $ 84.50 $ 88.72 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 CITY CLERK $ 69.68 $ 73.17 $ 76.82 $ 80.67 $ 84.70 CITY ENGINEER $ 86.92 $ 91.27 $ 95.83 $ 100.63 $ 105.66 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR $ 43.12 $ 45.28 $ 47.54 $ 49.92 $ 52.42 11/19/19 194 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 36 DEPARTMENT HEAD $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 67.93 $ 71.33 $ 74.89 $ 78.64 $ 82.57 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $ 61.47 $ 64.54 $ 67.77 $ 71.15 $ 74.71 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $ 49.72 $ 52.21 $ 54.82 $ 57.56 $ 60.44 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER $ 79.49 $ 83.46 $ 87.64 $ 92.02 $ 96.62 DIRECTOR OF ADMIN SERVICES $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DIRECTOR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $ 106.17 $ 111.48 $ 117.06 $ 122.91 $ 129.05 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER $ 75.01 $ 78.76 $ 82.70 $ 86.83 $ 91.17 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $ 62.50 $ 65.62 $ 68.90 $ 72.35 $ 75.96 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $ 72.45 $ 76.07 $ 79.87 $ 83.87 $ 88.06 EXEC ASST TO CITY MANAGER $ 43.95 $ 46.15 $ 48.46 $ 50.88 $ 53.43 EXEC ASST TO THE CITY ATTNY $ 42.87 $ 45.02 $ 47.28 $ 49.63 $ 52.12 FINANCE MANAGER $ 78.13 $ 82.03 $ 86.14 $ 90.44 $ 94.97 GIS PROGRAM MANAGER $ 77.22 $ 81.08 $ 85.13 $ 89.39 $ 93.86 HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST I $ 51.58 $ 54.16 $ 56.87 $ 59.71 $ 62.70 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 56.87 $ 59.72 $ 62.70 $ 65.84 $ 69.13 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT $ 31.06 $ 32.62 $ 34.25 $ 35.96 $ 37.76 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 78.13 $ 82.03 $ 86.14 $ 90.44 $ 94.97 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 42.53 $ 44.66 $ 46.89 $ 49.24 $ 51.70 I.T. ASSISTANT $ 41.83 $ 43.92 $ 46.12 $ 48.42 $ 50.84 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - INFRASTRUCTURE $ 77.22 $ 81.08 $ 85.13 $ 89.39 $ 93.86 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - APPLICATIONS $ 77.22 $ 81.08 $ 85.13 $ 89.39 $ 93.86 11/19/19 195 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 37 LEGAL SERVICES MANAGER $ 44.28 $ 46.50 $ 48.82 $ 51.26 $ 53.82 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 52.03 $ 54.63 $ 57.36 $ 60.23 $ 63.24 NETWORK SPECIALIST $ 53.51 $ 56.19 $ 59.00 $ 61.95 $ 65.05 PARK RESTORATION IMPV MGR $ 72.99 $ 76.64 $ 80.48 $ 84.50 $ 88.72 PERMIT CENTER MANAGER $ 67.93 $ 71.33 $ 74.89 $ 78.64 $ 82.57 PLANNING MANAGER $ 78.52 $ 82.45 $ 86.57 $ 90.90 $ 95.45 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER $ 67.12 $ 70.47 $ 73.99 $ 77.69 $ 81.58 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER $ 67.04 $ 70.39 $ 73.91 $ 77.61 $ 81.49 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MANAGER $ 64.16 $ 67.37 $ 70.74 $ 74.28 $ 77.99 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR $ 54.08 $ 56.79 $ 59.63 $ 62.61 $ 65.74 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $ 50.08 $ 52.59 $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.88 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 54.73 $ 57.47 $ 60.34 $ 63.36 $ 66.52 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 93.98 $ 98.68 $ 103.61 $ 108.79 $ 114.23 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 73.30 $ 76.97 $ 80.81 $ 84.85 $ 89.10 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 56.87 $ 59.72 $ 62.70 $ 65.84 $ 69.13 SERVICE CENTER SUPERINTENDENT $ 69.15 $ 72.61 $ 76.24 $ 80.05 $ 84.06 RECREATION MANAGER $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.88 $ 63.92 $ 67.12 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER $ 72.45 $ 76.07 $ 79.87 $ 83.87 $ 88.06 TRANSPORTATION MANAGER $ 78.04 $ 81.94 $ 86.04 $ 90.34 $ 94.86 WEB SPECIALIST $ 47.32 $ 49.68 $ 52.17 $ 54.77 $ 57.51 11/19/19 196 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 38 ATTACHMENT B EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS Classification July 2019 July 2020 July 2021 Accountant I 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% Accountant II 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% Accounting Technician 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Administrative Assistant 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Assistant Director Of Public Works Engineer 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Assistant to the City Manager 2.70% 2.70% 2.50% Assistant City Manager 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Assistant Director Of Community Dev/Building Official 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Business Systems Analyst 5.00% 5.00% 4.10% Capital Improvement Program Manager 5.00% 3.50% 0.00% Chief Technology Officer 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% City Clerk 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Community Relations Coordinator 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Deputy Building Official 5.00% 2.80% 0.00% Deputy City Clerk 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Deputy City Manager 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director Of Administrative Services 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director of Community Development 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director Of Public Works 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director Of Recreation & Community Services 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Economic Development Manager 5.00% 3.20% 0.00% Emergency Services Coordinator 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Environmental Programs Manager 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Executive Assistant to the City Attorney 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% Executive Assistant To The City Manager 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% Finance Manager 5.00% 3.90% 0.00% GIS Program Manager 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Human Resources Analyst I 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Human Resources Assistant 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Human Resources Analyst II 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Human Resources Manager 5.00% 3.90% 0.00% Human Resources Technician 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Information Technology Assistant 4.40% 0.00% 0.00% Innovation and Technology Manager – Applications 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% 11/19/19 197 of 237 CC 11.19.19, 39 Innovation and Technology Manager - Infrastructure 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Legal Services Manager 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% Management Analyst 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Network Specialist 1.30% 0.00% 0.00% Park Restoration & Improvement Manager 5.00% 3.50% 0.00% Permit Center Manager 5.00% 2.80% 0.00% Planning Manager 5.00% 5.00% 1.80% Public Affairs Manager 5.00% 4.40% 0.00% Public Information Officer 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Public Works Project Manager 5.00% 3.50% 0.00% Public Works Supervisor 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Recreation Manager 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Recreation Supervisor 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Senior Accountant 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% Senior Civil Engineer 4.00% 0.00% 0.00% Senior Management Analyst 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Service Center Superintendent 5.00% 1.20% 0.00% Sustainability Manager 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Transportation Manager 4.00% 0.00% 0.00% Web Specialist 1.30% 0.00% 0.00% 11/19/19 198 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 1 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 1 PROGRAM PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS FOR ELIGIBILITY It is City of Cupertino policy that those certain persons holding positions hereinafter defined and designated either as management or confidential positions shall be eligible for participation under the Unrepresented Employees Compensation Program as hereby adopted by action of the City Council and as same may be amended or as otherwise modified from time to time. It is the stated purpose of this Compensation Program to give recognition to and to differentiate those eligible employees from represented employees who achieve economic gain and other conditions of employment through negotiation. It is the intent that through this policy and those which are adopted or as may be modified or rescinded from time to time such recognition may be given. Eligibility for inclusion with this Compensation program is limited to persons holding positions as management or confidential employees as defined under section 2.52.290 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. These are as designated by the Appointing Authority and may be modified as circumstances warrant. Although subject to change in accordance with provision of the Personnel Code, the positions in the following classifications have been designated as unrepresented. MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATIONS: Classification Title Accountant I Accountant II Accounting Technician Administrative Assistant Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Manager Assistant Director of Community Development/Building Official Assistant Director of Public Works Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services Assistant to the City Manager Business Systems Analyst/Program Manager Capital Improvement Program Manager Chief Technology Officer/Director of Information Services (Department Head) City Architect City Clerk City Engineer Community Relations Coordinator 11/19/19 199 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 2 Deputy Building Official Deputy City Attorney Deputy City Clerk Deputy City Manager Director of Administrative Services (Department Head) Director of Community Development (Department Head) Director of Recreation and Community Services (Department Head) Director of Public Works Economic Development Manager Emergency Services Coordinator Environmental Programs Manager Executive Assistant to the City Attorney Executive Assistant to the City Manager Finance Manager GIS Coordinator GIS Program Manager Human Resources Analyst I Human Resources Analyst II Human Resources Assistant Human Resources Manager Human Resources Technician Information Technology Assistant Innovation and Technology Manager – Applications Innovation and Technology Manager - Infrastructure Legal Services Manager Management Analyst Network SpecialistPark Restoration and Improvement Manager Permit Center Manager Planning Manager Public Information Officer Public Affairs Manager Public Works Projects Manager Public Works Supervisor Recreation Manager Recreation Supervisor Senior Accountant Senior Assistant City Attorney Senior Civil Engineer Senior Management Analyst Service Center Superintendent Sustainability Manager Transportation Manager Web Specialist 11/19/19 200 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 3 In the event of any inconsistency between the Compensation Program and any Employment Contracts, the provisions of the Employment Contract and any amendments thereto control. Adopted by Action of the City Council, April 1, 1974 Revised 10/74, 3/78, 6/81, 6/82, 7/85, 7/87, 1/89, 7/90, 4/91, 5/91, 7/92, 6/95, 6/96, 7/99, 6/02, 7/04, 6/05, 04/07, 7/10, 10/12, 12/12, 7/13,11/13,12/13,3/14, 7/14, 11/15, 6/16, 10/16, 11/16, 6/17, 10/17, 7/19 11/19/19 201 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 4 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 2 SALARY SCHEDULE AND OTHER SALARY RATES It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be compensated for services rendered to and on behalf of the City on the basis of equitably of pay for duties and responsibilities assigned, meritorious service and comparability with similar work in other public and private employment in the same labor market; all of which is contingent upon the City’s ability to pay consistent with its fiscal policies. a. Effective the first full pay period after City Council adoption, a 4% salary increase will be added to the salary range of each classification in this unit. b. Effective the first full pay period in July 2020, a 3.5% salary increase will be added to the salary range of each classification in this unit. c. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, a 3% salary increase will be added to the salary range of each classification in this unit. See Attachment A for a list of paygrades. In addition, equity adjustments as identified in the City’s 2019 total compensation survey shall occur per Attachment B. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 Revised 8/78, 7/79, 6/80, 7/92, 6/95, 10/12, 7/13, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 202 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 5 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 3 TRAINING AND CONFERENCES I. POLICY A. Management Personnel It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be reimbursed or receive advances in accordance with the schedules, terms and conditions as set forth herein for attendance at conferences, meetings and training sessions as defined below for each. It is the intent of this policy to encourage the continuing education and awareness of said persons in the technical improvements and innovations in their fields of endeavor as they apply to the City or to implement a City approved strategy for attracting and retaining businesses in the City. One means of implementing this encouragement is through a formal reimbursement and advance schedule for authorized attendance at such conferences, meetings and training sessions. B. Non-Management Personnel When authorized by their supervisor, a non-management person may attend a conference, meeting or training session subject to the stated terms and conditions included herein for each with payment toward or reimbursement of certain expenses incurred as defined below for each. II DEFINITIONS A. Conferences A conference is an annual meeting of a work related organization the membership of which may be held in the name of the City or the individual. B. Local Area The local area is defined to be within Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties and within a 40- mile distance from Cupertino when traveling to Alameda County. C. Meetings A “meeting” shall mean a convention, conference, seminar, workshop, meal, or like assembly having to do with municipal government operations. An employee serving on a panel for interviews of job applicants shall not come under this definition. 11/19/19 203 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 6 D. Training Session A training session is any type of seminar or workshop the attendance at which is for the purpose of obtaining information of a work related nature to benefit the City’s operations or to enhance the attendee’s capabilities in the discharge of assigned duties and responsibilities. III REIMBURSEMENT AND ADVANCE PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Intent This schedule is written with the intent that the employee will make every effort to find the lowest possible cost to the City for traveling on City business. For example, if paying for parking at the airport is less expensive that paying for a taxi or airport shuttle, then the employee should drive their car and park at the airport; or if renting a car is lower than taking taxis at the out-of-town location, then a car should be rented; or air reservations should be booked in advance to obtain discounted fares. The following procedures apply whether the expense is being paid through a reimbursement or a direct advance. B. Registration Registration fees for authorized attendance at a meeting or training session will be paid by the City. C. Transportation The City will pay transportation costs on the basis of the lowest cost intent stated in paragraph A. Eligible transportation costs include airfare (with coach fare being the maximum), van or taxi service to and from the attendee’s home and airport, destination or airport parking charges, taxi and shuttle services at the out-of-town location, trains, tolls, or rental cars. Use of a personal automobile for City business shall be reimbursed or advanced at the rate per mile in effect for such use, except in no case shall it exceed air coach fare if the vehicle is being used for getting to the destination. Government or group rates offered by a provider of transportation must be used when available. Reimbursement or advances for use of a personal automobile on City business within a local area will not be made so as to supplement that already being paid to those persons receiving a monthly mileage allowance. D. Lodging Hotel or lodging expenses of the employee resulting from the authorized event or activity defined in this policy will be reimbursed or advanced if the lodging and event occurs outside of the local area. Not covered will be lodging expenses related to person(s) who are accompanying the City member, but who themselves are not on City business. In this 11/19/19 204 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 7 instance, for example, the difference between single and multiple occupancy rates for a room will not be reimbursed. Where the lodging is in connection with a conference or other organized educational activity, City-paid lodging costs shall not exceed the maximum group rate published by the conference or activity sponsor, providing that lodging at the group rate is available at the time of booking. If the group rate at the conference hotel is not available, then the non-conference lodging policy described in the next paragraph should be followed to find another comparable hotel. Where lodging is necessary for an activity that is not related to a conference or other organized educational activity, reimbursement or advances shall be limited to the actual cost of the room at a group or government rate. In the event that a group or government rate is not available, lodging rates that do not exceed the median price for lodging for that area and time period listed on travel websites like www.hotels.com, www.expedia.com or an equivalent service shall be eligible for reimbursement or advancement. E. Meals 1. With No Conference Payments toward or reimbursement of meals related to authorized activities or events shall be at the Internal Revenue Service per diem rate for meals and incidental expenses for a given location, as stated by IRS publications 463 and 1542 and by the U.S. General Services Administration. The per diem shall be split among meals as reasonably desired and reduced accordingly for less than full travel days. If per diem is claimed, no receipts are necessary. Alternatively, the actual cost of a meal can be claimed, within a standard of reasonableness, but receipts must be kept and submitted for the expense incurred. 2. As Part of a Conference When City personnel are attending a conference or other organized educational activity, they shall be reimbursed or advanced for meals not provided by the activity, on a per diem or actual cost basis. The per diem and actual cost rate shall follow the rules described in the meals with no conference paragraph. F. Other Expenses Payments toward or reimbursement of expenses at such functions shall be limited to the actual costs consistent with the application of reasonable standards. Other reasonable expenses related to business purposes shall be paid consistent with this policy. No payments shall be made unless, where available, receipts are kept and submitted for all expenses incurred. When receipts are not available, qualifying expenditures shall be reimbursed upon signing of an affidavit of expenditure. 11/19/19 205 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 8 No payment shall be made for any expenses incurred which are of a personal nature or not within a standard of reasonableness for the situation as may be defined by the Finance Department. G. Non-Reimbursable Expenses The City will not reimburse or advance payment toward expenses including, but not limited to: 1. The personal portion of any trip; 2. Political or charitable contributions or events; 3. Family expenses, including those of a partner when accompanying the employee on City- related business, as well as child or pet-related expenses; 4. Entertainment expenses, including theatre, shows, movies, sporting events, golf, spa treatments, etc. 5. Gifts of any kind for any purpose; 6. Service club meals; of those besides economic development staff; 7. Alcoholic beverages; 8. Non-mileage personal automobile expenses including repairs, insurance, gasoline, traffic citations; and 9. Personal losses incurred while on City business. IV ATTENDANCE AUTHORIZATION A. Budgetary Limitations Notwithstanding any attendance authorization contained herein, reimbursement or advances for expenses relative to conferences, meeting or training sessions shall not exceed the budgetary limitations. B. Conference Attendance Attendance at conferences or seminars by employees must be approved by their supervisor. C. Meetings Any employee, management or non-management, may attend a meeting when authorized by their supervisor. D. Training Sessions 11/19/19 206 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 9 Any employee, management or non-management, may attend a training session when authorized by their supervisor. V. FUNDING A. Appropriation Policy It shall be the policy of the City to appropriate funds subject to availability of resources. B. Training Sessions Payments toward or reimbursement of expenses incurred in attendance at training sessions, will be appropriated annually through the budget process. VI. DIRECT CASH ADVANCE POLICY From time to time, it may be necessary for a City employee to request a direct cash advance to cover anticipated expenses while traveling or doing business on the City’s behalf. Such request for an advance should be submitted to their supervisor no less than seven days prior to the need for the advance with the following information: 1) Purpose of the expenditure; 2) The anticipated amount of the expenditure (for example, hotel rates, meal costs, and transportation expenses); and 3) The dates of the expenditure. An accounting of expenses and return of any unused advance must be reported to the City within 30 calendar days of the employee’s return on the expense report described in Section VII. VII. EXPENSE REPORT REQUIREMENTS All expense reimbursement requests or final accounting of advances received must be approved by their supervisor, on forms determined by the Finance Department, within 30 calendar days of an expense incurred, and accompanied by a business purpose for all expenditures and a receipt for each non- per diem item. Revised 7/83, 7/85, 7/87, 7/88, 7/91, 7/92, 12/07,7/10 11/19/19 207 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 10 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 4 AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCES AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be compensated fairly for the use of personal automotive vehicles on City business. In many instances the use of personal vehicles is a condition of employment due to the absence of sufficient City owned vehicles for general transportation purposes. It is not intended, however, that such a condition of employment should work an undue hardship. For this reason, the following policies shall apply for mileage reimbursements. Those persons who occasionally are required to use their personal automobiles for City business shall be reimbursed for such use at an appropriate rate established by the City Council. Submission of reimbursement requests must be approved by the Department Head. Employees in the following classifications shall be paid on a monthly basis the following automobile allowance: Classification Allowance Director of Administrative Services 300.00 Director of Community Development 300.00 Assistant City Manager 300.00 Director of Recreation and Community Services 300.00 Director of Public Works 300.00 Chief Technology Officer/ 300.00 Director of Information Services City Clerk 250.00 Senior Civil Engineer 250.00 Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer 250.00 Transportation Manager 250.00 Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services 200.00 Public Affairs Manager 200.00 Deputy City Manager 200.00 Recreation Supervisor 200.00 Recreation Manager 200.00 Employees receiving automobile allowance shall be eligible for reimbursement for travel that exceeds two hundred miles round trip. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 11/19/19 208 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 11 Revised 7/74, 5/79, 6/80, 7/81, 8/84, 7/87, 1/89, 7/90,7/92, 6/96, 8/99, 6/00, 9/01, 1/02, 6/02, 10/07, 7/10, 7/11, 10/12, 12/12, 7/13, 11/15, 10/16, 11/16, 6/17, 7/19 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 5 ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS AND PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS It is City of Cupertino policy that eligible persons under this Compensation Program shall be entitled to City sponsored association memberships as well as receiving subscriptions to professional and technical publications. Such sponsorship, however, shall be conditioned upon the several factors as set forth below. Each association for which membership is claimed must be directly related to the field of endeavor of the person to be benefited. Each claim for City sponsored membership shall be submitted by or through the Department Head with their concurrence to the City Manager for approval. Subscriptions to or purchase of professional and technical publications may be provided at City expense when such have been authorized by the Department Head providing the subject matter and material generally contained therein are related to municipal governmental operations. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 Revised 7/92 11/19/19 209 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 12 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 6 OVERTIME WORKED EXEMPT POSITIONS: Management and non-represented professional employees are ineligible for overtime payments for time worked in excess of what otherwise would be considered as a normal work day or work week for other employees. However, no deduction from leave balances are made when such an employee is absent for less than a regular work day as long as the employee has his/her supervisor’s approval. Nothing in this policy precludes the alternative work schedule, which may include an absence of a full eight hour day, when forty hours have been worked in the same seven day work period. NON-EXEMPT POSITIONS: Confidential employees are eligible for overtime or compensation time, at their discretion, for the time worked in excess of 40 hours per week. Nothing in this policy precludes the alternative work schedule, which may include an absence of a full eight hour day, where forty hours have been worked in the same seven day period. COMPENSATORY TIME OFF At the employee’s discretion, compensatory time (CTO) may be granted for overtime worked at the rate of time and one-half for each hour worked in lieu of compensation in cash. Employees, who have previously earned CTO, shall be allowed to schedule CTO at the employee’s discretion provided (1) that prior supervisory approval has been obtained and (2) the request is made in writing. CTO may be accrued for up to 80 hours per calendar year. Any CTO earned exceeding 80 hours will be paid at the rate of time and one-half. An employee may carry over the unused balance into the next calendar year. Any unused carryover balance will be automatically paid out at the end of the calendar year. An employee may exercise his/her option twice each calendar year to convert any/or all accumulated compensatory time to cash. Adopted by Action of the City Council April 1, 1974 Revised 6/80, 7/91, 7/92, 6/96, 7/97, 4/07, 7/13, 10/16 11/19/19 210 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 13 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 7 HEALTH BENEFITS PLAN - EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide group hospital and medical insurance under which employees in Management and Confidential positions and their dependents may be covered. The purpose of this program is to promote and preserve the health of employees and their families through comprehensive health plans available only through employer sponsorship. Although the premium cost for the insurance provided remains the ultimate responsibility of the employee in these positions, the City shall contribute the amounts listed below towards the premium or pay the full cost of the premium if less than the stated amounts. If the premium amounts for any employee covered by this policy are less than the amounts listed below per month, the difference between the premium amount and the stated amounts will be included in the employee’s gross pay. Effective January 1, 2020 City Max Health Contribution City Max *Dental Contribution City Total Max Contribution Employee 848.87 126.78 975.65 Employee +1 1,443.09 126.78 1,569.87 Employee +2 1,876.01 126.78 2,002.79 January 1, 2021 City Max Health Contribution City Max *Dental Contribution City Total Max Contribution Employee 891.32 126.78 1,018.10 Employee +1 1,515.24 126.78 1,642.02 Employee +2 1,969.81 126.78 2,096.59 January 1, 2022 City Max Health Contribution City Max *Dental Contribution City Total Max Contribution Employee 935.88 126.78 1,062.66 Employee +1 1,591.01 126.78 1,717.79 Employee +2 2,068.31 126.78 2,195.09 Health In Lieu Payments The City shall provide a payment of $375 per month in lieu of health care premiums, for Appointed employees who provide proof of alternate coverage. This payment shall be in the form of a contribution to the employee’s deferred compensation plan. 11/19/19 211 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 14 *Dental Coverage: Effective the first month after Council adoption of MOU, dental coverage is capped at $2,500.00 per dependent per annual plan year for the term of this contract. Adopted by Action of the City Council September 16, 1974 Revised 7/75, 7/76, 7/77, 8/78, 7/79, 6/80, 6/81, 7/81, 6/82, 7/83, 7/84, 7/88, 7/89, 7/90, 7/91, 7/92, 6/95, 7/97, 7/99, 6/00, 6/02, 7/04, 6/05, 4/07,12/12, 7/13, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 212 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 15 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 8 FIXED HOLIDAYS It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to recognize days of historical and national significance as holidays of the City without loss of pay or benefits. Recognizing the desirable times throughout the year, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide days off in lieu of holidays for management and confidential employees at such times as are convenient for each employee and supervisor, when such policy is compatible with the workload and schedule of the City. The City provides the following fixed paid holidays for eligible employees covered by this agreement: 1. New Year’s Day 2. Martin Luther King Day 3. Presidents’ Day 4. Memorial Day 5. Independence day 6. Labor Day 7. Veteran’s Day 8. Thanksgiving Day 9. Day Following Thanksgiving 10. Christmas Eve 11. Christmas Day 12. New Year’s Eve When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as the non-work day. When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the previous Friday shall be observed as the non-work day. FLOATING HOLIDAY In addition to the paid holidays, employees occupying these positions shall be provided 20 floating hours per calendar year as non-work time with full pay and benefits. Employees may accumulate floating holiday hours up to two times their annual accrual. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1975 Revised 6/80, 6/89, 7/92, 7/99, 7/13 11/19/19 213 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 16 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 9 LIFE, LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE, AND SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to make available group insurance for Management and Confidential employees that will mitigate the personal and family financial hardships resulting from continuing disability that prevents an employee from performing gainfully in his or her occupation. It is further the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide life insurance benefits in an amount of two and one half times the employee’s annual salary to a maximum of $250,000.00. Employees occupying unrepresented positions may enroll in the disability income program and the life insurance program offered if eligible under the contract provisions of the policy and the personnel rules of the City. The full cost of premiums for these programs shall be paid by the City for such employees. Adopted by Action of the City Council September 16, 1976 Revised 7/76, 6/80, 6/81, 6/82, 6/92, 10/16 11/19/19 214 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 17 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 10 DEFERRED COMPENSATION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide equitable current compensation and reasonable retirement security for management and confidential employees for services performed for the City. The City participates in the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and deferred compensation plans have been established. Both the employee and employer may make contributions from current earnings to these plans. The purpose of this policy is to promote means by which compensation may be provided in such manner and form to best meet the requirements of the City and the needs of individual employees, thereby increasing the ability, to attract and retain competent management and confidential employees. The City shall maintain and administer means by which employees in these positions may defer portions of their current earnings for future utilization. Usage of such plans shall be subject to such agreements, rules and procedures as are necessary to properly administer each plan. Employee contributions to such plans may be made in such amounts as felt proper and necessary to the employee. Employer contributions shall be as determined by the City Council. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1975 Revised 6/80, 7/87, 7/92, 7/99 11/19/19 215 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 18 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 11 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM CONTRIBUTION A. Employees hired on or before December 29, 2012 Only: For employees hired on or before December 29, 2012, the City has contracted with CalPERS for a 2.7% @55 formula. Effective in the first full pay period in July 2017, each employee shall pay the full 8.0% of applicable salary of the employee’s contribution towards CalPERS. B. For Employees hired by the City of Cupertino on December 30, 2012 or December 31, 2012 or a current CalPERS employee who qualifies as a classic member under CalPERS Regulations Only: For Employees hired by the City of Cupertino on December 30, 2012 or December 31, 2012 or a current CalPERS employee who qualifies as a classic member under CalPERS Regulations only the City has contracted with CalPERS for a 2.0% @ 60 retirement formula, three year average compensation. EffectiveOctober 1, 2016, the City shall not pay the employee’s contribution rate to the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and each employee shall pay the full 7% of applicable salary of the employee’s contribution towards CalPERS. C. For new employees hired by the City of Cupertino on or after January 1, 2013 and do not qualify as Classic members Only: For new employees hired by the City of Cupertino on or after January 1, 2013 and do not qualify as classic members as defined by CalPERS, CalPERS has by statute implemented a 2% @ 62 formula, three year average and employees in this category shall pay 50% of the normal cost rate as determined by CalPERS. Adopted by Action of the City Council June, 1981 Revised 6/87, 6/89, 7/90, 7/91, 7/92, 6/03, 7/04, 4/07, 7/10, 10/12, 12/12, 7/13, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 216 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 19 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 12 DENTAL INSURANCE - EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide dental insurance under which employees in Management and Confidential positions and their dependents may be covered. The purpose of this program is to promote and preserve the health of employees. The premium cost for the insurance provided by the City shall not exceed $126.78* per month per employee. Enrollment in the plan or plans made available pursuant to this policy shall be in accordance with Personnel Rules of the City and the provisions of the contract for such insurance between the City and carrier or carriers. *Dental Coverage: Effective the first month after Council adoption of agreement, dental coverage is capped at $2,500.00 per dependent per annual plan year for the term of this contract. Adopted by Action of City Council July 1, 1983 Revised 7/87, 7/88, 7/89, 7/90, 7/91, 7/92, 6/95, 7/99, 4/07, 10/12, 10/16, 7/19 11/19/19 217 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 20 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 13 ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE The department heads shall receive eighty (80) hours of administrative leave with pay per year. Unrepresented employees exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act shall receive forty (40) hours of administrative leave with pay per year. Employees may accumulate administrative leave hours up to two times their annual accrual. Employees shall be eligible to convert administrative leave hours to pay one time each calendar year. Adopted by Action of the City Council July, 1988 Revised 7/92, 7/97, 7/99, 7/10, 12/12, 10/16 11/19/19 218 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 21 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 14 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide an Employee Assistance Program for the benefit of Management and Confidential employees and their eligible dependents. The purpose of this program is to provide professional assistance and counseling concerning financial, legal, pre-retirement, and other matters of a personal nature. Adopted by Action of the City Council June 17, 1996 11/19/19 219 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 22 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 15 VACATION ACCUMULATION The department heads shall earn vacation hours under the same vacation accumulation schedule as all other employees. Credit shall be provided for previous public sector service time on a year-for-year basis as to annual vacation accumulation. Credit shall only be given for completed years of service. Public service credit shall not apply to any other supplemental benefit. Employee(s) affected by this policy will have the responsibility of providing certification as to previous public sector service. Benefited full-time employees accrue vacation in accordance with the following schedule. Benefited employees who work less than a full-time work schedule accrue vacation in accordance with the following schedule on a pro-rated basis. Service Time Annual Accruals Maximum Accrual 0 - 3 Years 80 Hours 160 Hours 4 - 9 Years 120 Hours 240 Hours 10 – 14 Years 160 Hours 272 Hours 15 – 19 Years 176 Hours 320 Hours 20 + Years 192 Hours 352 Hours An employee may accrue no more vacation credit than what is listed above. VACATION CREDITS The hiring manager, with the approval of the department head and the City Manager, may offer a vacation bank of up to 120 hours of vacation to a prospective candidate in the Unrepresented group. These hours do not vest for payoff purposes if the employee leaves service. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1997 Revised 6/99, 7/10, 12/12, 7/13, 10/16 11/19/19 220 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 23 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 16 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Housing assistance may be offered to the department heads pursuant to Resolution No. 15-092. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 7, 1997 Revised 7/99, 7/10, 8/12, 10/15 11/19/19 221 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 24 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 17 VISION INSURANCE – EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to provide vision insurance under which employees and their dependents may be covered. The purpose of this program is to promote and preserve the health of employees. The premium cost for the insurance provided by the City shall not exceed $14.94 per month per employee. Enrollment in the plan or plans made available pursuant to this policy shall be in accordance with the provisions of the contract between the City and carrier or carriers providing vision insurance coverage, Adopted by Action of the City Council July 1997 Revised 7/99, 6/02, 6/03, 7/10, 10/12 11/19/19 222 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 25 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 18 WORK OUT OF CLASSIFICATION/WORK IN DUAL CLASSIFICATION Work Out of Classification – Temporary assignment, approved in advance by the department head, to a classification in a higher pay grade shall be compensated at the Step 1 rate of the higher classification or at a rate five (5) percent greater than that of the regular position, whichever is greater, for the number of hours assigned. In order to qualify for out-of-classification pay, an employee shall work a minimum of four (4) hours per day in the temporary assignment. An employee may be assigned to work out of class in a higher classification when there is a vacant position for which a recruitment is being, or will be, conducted. Out of class assignments may not exceed 960 hours in a fiscal year. Compensation for work performed in an out-of-class capacity is included for purposes of calculating CalPERS compensation, however, this is at the discretion of CalPERS and future changes to CalPERS regulations would supersede the language of this section. An employee may receive acting pay for working in a higher classification where a vacancy does not exist, in the case of an incumbent being on vacation or leave of absence, or due to the employee being asked to perform higher level work on any other temporary basis. Acting pay is not included for purposes of calculating CalPERS compensation. The higher rate of pay shall be used in computing overtime when authorized overtime is worked in a non-exempt, out of class or acting work assignment. When a non-exempt employee is working out of class or acting in an exempt position for 20 hours or more in a work week, the employee will be ineligible to receive overtime pay for any and all hours worked in the exempt classification during that work week. All requests for out of class pay or acting pay must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services or his/her designee. Work in Dual Classifications – The City Manager may, in his or her sole discretion, grant a pay differential up to five percent (5%) above the higher base salary to an employee assigned by the City Manager to perform all of the duties of another position in addition to the employee’s regular duties, provided that a differential of dual assignments under this provision shall only be paid where the additional assignment is to a position equivalent to the level of the employee’s regular position in a different department or division than the employee’s regular classification, the duration of the additional assignment is for a period of one or more months, and the published base salary for the equivalent level position is the same or lower than the published salary for the 11/19/19 223 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 26 employee’s current classification such that the employee does not quality for working out of class pay. Adopted by Action of the City Council October 2016 Revised 7/19 11/19/19 224 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 27 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 19 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM It is the intent of the City to recognize the value of continuing education and professional development of its employees; and to adopt an Education Reimbursement Program which will encourage employees to avail themselves of City job related educational opportunities that will advance their knowledge and interests in the direction of their career path. Courses should either: a) maintain or improve job skills in the employee’s current position; b) be expressly required by the City or by law; or c) prepare the employee to become a competitive applicant for a different position with the City. The Education Reimbursement Program is a benefit to all full time benefited employees who have completed the required probationary period and provides education reimbursement of up to two thousand dollars($2,000) per calendar year for the cost of registration, required textbooks and/or materials and parking. Employees who wish to seek reimbursement from the City for educational program costs shall provide a written request for reimbursement in advance of enrollment to the Human Resources Division. The form provided shall include the type of training, sponsoring organization or institution, meeting times and costs. Human Resources and the employee’s department head will make the determination if the chosen education program is eligible for reimbursement. No employee shall receive any reimbursement until they have provided satisfactory proof of successful completion of the coursework with a grade of “C” or above, or “Pass” in the case of a Pass/Fail course. Such proof of completion shall be provided within 30 days of the conclusion of the course. Education reimbursement is a taxable benefit under IRS Code. Education reimbursement will be applied to the calendar year in which the course is passed and satisfactory proof of completion is submitted. Mandatory or annual coursework, attendance at conferences and training required to maintain job specific certifications or proficiencies are not included in the Education Reimbursement Program. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 2019 11/19/19 225 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 28 City of Cupertino UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM Policy No. 20 CITY SPONSORED RECREATION AND WELLNESS PROGRAMS Unrepresented employees shall have the privilege of enrollment in City sponsored recreation programs at the City residents’ fee structure and in preference to non-residents wishing to enroll. Each calendar year, employees and family members on the employee’s dental plan are eligible to be reimbursed up to $500 per employee in Rec Bucks. Employees shall be reimbursed for approved recreation services in accordance with the City’s Recreation Buck Policies. Programs allowing for preregistration will be reimbursed after completion of the program, including those allowing for or requiring preregistration in the calendar year prior to reimbursement. Reimbursements shall be applied to the year in which they are received. Benefited employees will also receive a free employee-only annual Cupertino Sports Center membership. Part-time benefited employees will have the annual amount of Recreation Bucks prorated based on number of hours worked. Recreation Bucks are a taxable benefit under IRS Code, and must be used by the employee within the calendar year and are non-transferrable. City employees are eligible to participate in the City’s wellness program as provided for in the City’s Administrative Rules and Regulations. Adopted by Action of the City Council July 2019 11/19/19 226 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 29 City of Cupertino Listing of Unrepresented Classifications by Salary Rate or Pay Grades Effective July 1, 2013 (Res. No. 13-061) Amended 11/19/13 (Res. No. 13-099) Amended 12/17/13 (Res. No. 13-108) Amended 3/18/14 (Res. No. 14-130) Amended 11/3/14 (Res. No. 14-209) Amended 11/3/2015 (Res. No. 15-099 ) Amended 6/21/16 (Res. No. 16- ) Amended 10/4/16 (Res. No. ) Amended 10/18/16 (Res. No. ) Amended 11/15/16 (Res. No. ) Amended 6/20/17 (Res. No. ) Amended 10/17/17 (Res. No. ) Amended 7/16/19 (Res. No. ) Amended 11/19/19 (Res. No. ) 11/19/19 227 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 30 ATTACHMENT A SALARY SCHEDULE Salary Effective First Full Pay Period after Council Adoption – Amended November 19, 2019 Classification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT I $ 40.23 $ 42.24 $ 44.35 $ 46.57 $ 48.89 ACCOUNTANT II $ 44.34 $ 46.56 $ 48.89 $ 51.34 $ 53.90 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 39.90 $ 41.89 $ 43.99 $ 46.19 $ 48.50 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 35.09 $ 36.84 $ 38.69 $ 40.62 $ 42.65 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 80.13 $ 84.14 $ 88.34 $ 92.76 $ 97.40 ASSISTANT CITY MGR $ 106.67 $ 112.01 $ 117.61 $ 123.49 $ 129.66 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 61.24 $ 64.30 $ 67.51 $ 70.89 $ 74.43 ASST DIR COMM DEV/BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 76.32 $ 80.13 $ 84.14 $ 88.35 $ 92.76 ASST DIR PARKS AND RECREATION $ 76.32 $ 80.13 $ 84.14 $ 88.35 $ 92.76 ASST DIR PUBLIC WORKS/ $ 79.40 $ 83.36 $ 87.53 $ 91.91 $ 96.51 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST $ 52.03 $ 54.63 $ 57.36 $ 60.23 $ 63.24 CAPITAL IMPV PROGRAM MGR $ 66.16 $ 69.46 $ 72.94 $ 76.58 $ 80.41 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 CITY CLERK $ 61.94 $ 65.04 $ 68.29 $ 71.71 $ 75.29 CITY ENGINEER $ 79.40 $ 83.36 $ 87.53 $ 91.91 $ 96.51 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR $ 40.45 $ 42.47 $ 44.60 $ 46.83 $ 49.17 DEPARTMENT HEAD $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 61.99 $ 65.08 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.34 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $ 57.66 $ 60.54 $ 63.57 $ 66.74 $ 70.08 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $ 44.20 $ 46.41 $ 48.73 $ 51.17 $ 53.73 11/19/19 228 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 31 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER $ 72.60 $ 76.24 $ 80.05 $ 84.05 $ 88.25 DIRECTOR OF ADMIN SERVICES $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DIRECTOR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION $ 94.22 $ 98.93 $ 103.88 $ 109.08 $ 114.52 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $ 96.98 $ 101.82 $ 106.92 $ 112.26 $ 117.88 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER $ 68.18 $ 71.59 $ 75.17 $ 78.93 $ 82.87 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $55.69 $ 40.45 $58.48 $ 42.47 $61.40 $ 44.60 $64.47 $ 46.83 $67.69 $ 49.17 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $ 61.64 $ 64.72 $ 67.96 $ 71.36 $ 74.92 EXEC ASST TO CITY MANAGER $ 41.23 $ 43.29 $ 45.46 $ 47.73 $ 50.12 EXEC ASST TO THE CITY ATTNY $ 40.22 $ 42.23 $ 44.35 $ 46.56 $ 48.89 FINANCE MANAGER $ 70.54 $ 74.06 $ 77.77 $ 81.65 $ 85.74 GIS PROGRAM MANAGER $ 68.64 $ 72.07 $ 75.67 $ 79.46 $ 83.43 HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST I $ 48.15 $ 50.55 $ 53.08 $ 55.74 $ 58.52 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 53.08 $ 55.74 $ 58.52 $ 61.45 $ 64.52 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT $ 29.14 $ 30.60 $ 32.13 $ 33.73 $ 35.42 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 70.54 $ 74.06 $ 77.77 $ 81.65 $ 85.74 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 39.90 $ 41.89 $ 43.99 $ 46.19 $ 48.50 I.T. ASSISTANT $ 39.24 $ 41.20 $ 43.26 $ 45.42 $ 47.69 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - APPLICATIONS $ 68.64 $ 72.07 $ 75.67 $ 79.46 $ 83.43 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - INFRASTRUCTURE $ 68.64 $ 72.07 $ 75.67 $ 79.46 $ 83.43 LEGAL SERVICES MANAGER $ 41.54 $ 43.61 $ 45.80 $ 48.08 $ 50.49 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 48.56 $ 50.99 $ 53.54 $ 56.21 $ 59.03 NETWORK SPECIALIST $ 50.20 $ 52.71 $ 55.34 $ 58.11 $ 61.02 PARK RESTORATION IMPV MGR $ 66.16 $ 69.46 $ 72.94 $ 76.58 $ 80.41 11/19/19 229 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 32 PERMIT CENTER MANAGER $ 61.99 $ 65.08 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.34 PLANNING MANAGER $ 68.91 $ 72.36 $ 75.97 $ 79.77 $ 83.76 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER $ 60.30 $ 63.32 $ 66.48 $ 69.81 $ 73.30 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER $ 61.24 $ 64.30 $ 67.51 $ 70.89 $ 74.43 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MANAGER $ 58.15 $ 61.06 $ 64.11 $ 67.32 $ 70.68 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR $ 50.48 $ 53.00 $ 55.65 $ 58.44 $ 61.36 RECREATION MANAGER $ 51.80 $ 54.38 $ 57.10 $ 59.96 $ 62.96 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $ 46.98 $ 49.33 $ 51.80 $ 54.38 $ 57.10 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 51.34 $ 53.91 $ 56.60 $ 59.43 $ 62.40 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 88.15 $ 92.56 $ 97.19 $ 102.05 $ 107.15 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 68.76 $ 72.20 $ 75.81 $ 79.60 $ 83.58 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 53.08 $ 55.74 $ 58.52 $ 61.45 $ 64.52 SERVICE CENTER SUPERINTENDENT $ 64.10 $ 67.30 $ 70.67 $ 74.20 $ 77.91 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER $ 61.64 $ 64.72 $ 67.96 $ 71.36 $ 74.92 TRANSPORTATION MANAGER $ 73.21 $ 76.87 $ 80.71 $ 84.75 $ 88.98 WEB SPECIALIST $ 44.38 $ 46.60 $ 48.93 $ 51.38 $ 53.95 Salary Effective First Full Pay Period in July 2020 – Amended November 19, 2019 Classification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT I $ 41.63 $ 43.71 $ 45.90 $ 48.20 $ 50.61 ACCOUNTANT II $ 45.90 $ 48.19 $ 50.60 $ 53.13 $ 55.79 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 41.30 $ 43.36 $ 45.53 $ 47.81 $ 50.19 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 36.32 $ 38.13 $ 40.04 $ 42.04 $ 44.14 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 82.94 $ 87.08 $ 91.44 $ 96.01 $ 100.81 ASSISTANT CITY MGR $ 113.39 $ 119.06 $ 125.01 $ 131.26 $ 137.82 11/19/19 230 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 33 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 65.09 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.35 $ 79.12 ASST DIR COMM DEV/BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 81.12 $ 85.18 $ 89.44 $ 93.91 $ 98.60 ASST DIR PUBLIC WORKS $ 84.39 $ 88.61 $ 93.04 $ 97.70 $ 102.58 ASST DIR PARKS AND RECREATION $ 81.12 $ 85.18 $ 89.44 $ 93.91 $ 98.60 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST $ 56.55 $ 59.37 $ 62.34 $ 65.46 $ 68.73 CAPITAL IMPV PROGRAM MGR $ 70.87 $ 74.41 $ 78.13 $ 82.04 $ 86.14 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 CITY CLERK $ 67.32 $ 70.68 $ 74.22 $ 77.93 $ 81.82 CITY ENGINEER $ 84.39 $ 88.61 $ 93.04 $ 97.70 $ 102.58 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR $ 41.87 $ 43.96 $ 46.16 $ 48.47 $ 50.89 DEPARTMENT HEAD $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 65.95 $ 69.25 $ 72.71 $ 76.35 $ 80.16 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $ 59.67 $ 62.66 $ 65.79 $ 69.08 $ 72.54 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $ 48.03 $ 50.44 $ 52.96 $ 55.61 $ 58.39 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER $ 77.18 $ 81.03 $ 85.09 $ 89.34 $ 93.81 DIRECTOR OF ADMIN SERVICES $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DIRECTOR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION $ 100.15 $ 105.16 $ 110.42 $ 115.94 $ 121.73 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $ 103.08 $ 108.23 $ 113.65 $ 119.33 $ 125.29 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER $ 72.82 $ 76.47 $ 80.29 $ 84.30 $ 88.52 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $59.20 $ 41.87 $62.16 $ 43.96 $65.26 $ 46.16 $68.53 $ 48.47 $71.95 $ 50.89 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $ 66.99 $ 70.34 $ 73.85 $ 77.55 $ 81.42 EXEC ASST TO CITY MANAGER $ 42.67 $ 44.81 $ 47.05 $ 49.40 $ 51.87 EXEC ASST TO THE CITY ATTNY $ 41.62 $ 43.71 $ 45.90 $ 48.19 $ 50.60 11/19/19 231 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 34 FINANCE MANAGER $ 75.85 $ 79.65 $ 83.63 $ 87.81 $ 92.20 GIS PROGRAM MANAGER $ 74.59 $ 78.32 $ 82.24 $ 86.35 $ 90.67 HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST I $ 50.08 $ 52.59 $ 55.21 $ 57.98 $ 60.87 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.87 $ 63.92 $ 67.11 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT $ 30.16 $ 31.67 $ 33.25 $ 34.91 $ 36.66 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 75.85 $ 79.65 $ 83.63 $ 87.81 $ 92.20 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 41.30 $ 43.36 $ 45.53 $ 47.81 $ 50.19 I.T. ASSISTANT $ 40.61 $ 42.64 $ 44.77 $ 47.01 $ 49.36 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - INFRASTRUCTURE $ 74.59 $ 78.32 $ 82.24 $ 86.35 $ 90.67 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - APPLICATIONS $ 74.59 $ 78.32 $ 82.24 $ 86.35 $ 90.67 LEGAL SERVICES MANAGER $ 42.99 $ 45.14 $ 47.40 $ 49.77 $ 52.26 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 50.51 $ 53.04 $ 55.69 $ 58.47 $ 61.40 NETWORK SPECIALIST $ 51.95 $ 54.55 $ 57.28 $ 60.14 $ 63.15 PARK RESTORATION IMPV MGR $ 70.87 $ 74.41 $ 78.13 $ 82.04 $ 86.14 PERMIT CENTER MANAGER $ 65.95 $ 69.25 $ 72.71 $ 76.35 $ 80.16 PLANNING MANAGER $ 74.89 $ 78.63 $ 82.56 $ 86.69 $ 91.03 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER $ 65.16 $ 68.42 $ 71.84 $ 75.43 $ 79.20 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER $ 65.09 $ 68.34 $ 71.76 $ 75.35 $ 79.12 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MANAGER $ 62.29 $ 65.41 $ 68.68 $ 72.11 $ 75.72 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR $ 52.51 $ 55.13 $ 57.89 $ 60.79 $ 63.82 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $ 48.62 $ 51.06 $ 53.61 $ 56.29 $ 59.10 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 53.14 $ 55.79 $ 58.58 $ 61.51 $ 64.59 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 91.24 $ 95.80 $ 100.59 $ 105.62 $ 110.90 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 71.17 $ 74.72 $ 78.46 $ 82.38 $ 86.50 11/19/19 232 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 35 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.88 $ 63.92 $ 67.11 SERVICE CENTER SUPERINTENDENT $ 67.14 $ 70.50 $ 74.02 $ 77.72 $ 81.61 RECREATION MANAGER $ 53.61 $ 56.29 $ 59.10 $ 62.06 $ 65.16 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER $ 66.99 $ 70.34 $ 73.85 $ 77.55 $ 81.42 TRANSPORTATION MANAGER $ 75.77 $ 79.56 $ 83.54 $ 87.71 $ 92.10 WEB SPECIALIST $ 45.94 $ 48.23 $ 50.65 $ 53.18 $ 55.84 Salary Effective First Full Pay Period in July 2021 – Amended November 19, 2019 Classification Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 ACCOUNTANT I $ 42.88 $ 45.03 $ 47.28 $ 49.64 $ 52.12 ACCOUNTANT II $ 47.27 $ 49.64 $ 52.12 $ 54.73 $ 57.46 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN $ 42.53 $ 44.66 $ 46.89 $ 49.24 $ 51.70 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $ 37.41 $ 39.28 $ 41.24 $ 43.30 $ 45.47 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 85.42 $ 89.70 $ 94.18 $ 98.89 $ 103.83 ASSISTANT CITY MGR $ 116.79 $ 122.63 $ 128.76 $ 135.20 $ 141.96 ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER $ 68.72 $ 72.15 $ 75.76 $ 79.55 $ 83.53 ASST DIR COMM DEV/BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 83.55 $ 87.73 $ 92.12 $ 96.72 $ 101.56 ASST DIR PUBLIC WORKS/ $ 86.92 $ 91.27 $ 95.83 $ 100.63 $ 105.66 ASST DIR PARKS AND RECREATION $ 83.55 $ 87.73 $ 92.12 $ 96.72 $ 101.56 BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYST $ 60.63 $ 63.66 $ 66.84 $ 70.19 $ 73.70 CAPITAL IMPV PROGRAM MGR $ 72.99 $ 76.64 $ 80.48 $ 84.50 $ 88.72 CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 CITY CLERK $ 69.68 $ 73.17 $ 76.82 $ 80.67 $ 84.70 CITY ENGINEER $ 86.92 $ 91.27 $ 95.83 $ 100.63 $ 105.66 COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR $ 43.12 $ 45.28 $ 47.54 $ 49.92 $ 52.42 11/19/19 233 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 36 DEPARTMENT HEAD $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL $ 67.93 $ 71.33 $ 74.89 $ 78.64 $ 82.57 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY $ 61.47 $ 64.54 $ 67.77 $ 71.15 $ 74.71 DEPUTY CITY CLERK $ 49.72 $ 52.21 $ 54.82 $ 57.56 $ 60.44 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER $ 79.49 $ 83.46 $ 87.64 $ 92.02 $ 96.62 DIRECTOR OF ADMIN SERVICES $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DIRECTOR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION $ 103.15 $ 108.31 $ 113.73 $ 119.42 $ 125.38 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS $ 106.17 $ 111.48 $ 117.06 $ 122.91 $ 129.05 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER $ 75.01 $ 78.76 $ 82.70 $ 86.83 $ 91.17 EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR $62.50 $ 43.12 $65.62 $ 45.28 $68.90 $ 47.54 $72.35 $ 49.92 $75.96 $ 52.42 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS MANAGER $ 72.45 $ 76.07 $ 79.87 $ 83.87 $ 88.06 EXEC ASST TO CITY MANAGER $ 43.95 $ 46.15 $ 48.46 $ 50.88 $ 53.43 EXEC ASST TO THE CITY ATTNY $ 42.87 $ 45.02 $ 47.28 $ 49.63 $ 52.12 FINANCE MANAGER $ 78.13 $ 82.03 $ 86.14 $ 90.44 $ 94.97 GIS PROGRAM MANAGER $ 77.22 $ 81.08 $ 85.13 $ 89.39 $ 93.86 HUMAN RESOURCE ANALYST I $ 51.58 $ 54.16 $ 56.87 $ 59.71 $ 62.70 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II $ 56.87 $ 59.72 $ 62.70 $ 65.84 $ 69.13 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT $ 31.06 $ 32.62 $ 34.25 $ 35.96 $ 37.76 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER $ 78.13 $ 82.03 $ 86.14 $ 90.44 $ 94.97 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN $ 42.53 $ 44.66 $ 46.89 $ 49.24 $ 51.70 I.T. ASSISTANT $ 41.83 $ 43.92 $ 46.12 $ 48.42 $ 50.84 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - INFRASTRUCTURE $ 77.22 $ 81.08 $ 85.13 $ 89.39 $ 93.86 INNOVATION AND TECH MGR - APPLICATIONS $ 77.22 $ 81.08 $ 85.13 $ 89.39 $ 93.86 11/19/19 234 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 37 LEGAL SERVICES MANAGER $ 44.28 $ 46.50 $ 48.82 $ 51.26 $ 53.82 MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 52.03 $ 54.63 $ 57.36 $ 60.23 $ 63.24 NETWORK SPECIALIST $ 53.51 $ 56.19 $ 59.00 $ 61.95 $ 65.05 PARK RESTORATION IMPV MGR $ 72.99 $ 76.64 $ 80.48 $ 84.50 $ 88.72 PERMIT CENTER MANAGER $ 67.93 $ 71.33 $ 74.89 $ 78.64 $ 82.57 PLANNING MANAGER $ 78.52 $ 82.45 $ 86.57 $ 90.90 $ 95.45 PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER $ 67.12 $ 70.47 $ 73.99 $ 77.69 $ 81.58 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER $ 67.04 $ 70.39 $ 73.91 $ 77.61 $ 81.49 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT MANAGER $ 64.16 $ 67.37 $ 70.74 $ 74.28 $ 77.99 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR $ 54.08 $ 56.79 $ 59.63 $ 62.61 $ 65.74 RECREATION SUPERVISOR $ 50.08 $ 52.59 $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.88 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $ 54.73 $ 57.47 $ 60.34 $ 63.36 $ 66.52 SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY $ 93.98 $ 98.68 $ 103.61 $ 108.79 $ 114.23 SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER $ 73.30 $ 76.97 $ 80.81 $ 84.85 $ 89.10 SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST $ 56.87 $ 59.72 $ 62.70 $ 65.84 $ 69.13 SERVICE CENTER SUPERINTENDENT $ 69.15 $ 72.61 $ 76.24 $ 80.05 $ 84.06 RECREATION MANAGER $ 55.22 $ 57.98 $ 60.88 $ 63.92 $ 67.12 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER $ 72.45 $ 76.07 $ 79.87 $ 83.87 $ 88.06 TRANSPORTATION MANAGER $ 78.04 $ 81.94 $ 86.04 $ 90.34 $ 94.86 WEB SPECIALIST $ 47.32 $ 49.68 $ 52.17 $ 54.77 $ 57.51 11/19/19 235 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 38 ATTACHMENT B EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS Classification July 2019 July 2020 July 2021 Accountant I 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% Accountant II 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% Accounting Technician 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Administrative Assistant 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Assistant Director Of Public Works Engineer 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Assistant to the City Manager 2.70% 2.70% 2.50% Assistant City Manager 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Assistant Director Of Community Dev/Building Official 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Business Systems Analyst 5.00% 5.00% 4.10% Capital Improvement Program Manager 5.00% 3.50% 0.00% Chief Technology Officer 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% City Clerk 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Community Relations Coordinator 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Deputy Building Official 5.00% 2.80% 0.00% Deputy City Clerk 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Deputy City Manager 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director Of Administrative Services 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director of Community Development 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director Of Public Works 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Director Of Recreation & Community Services 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Economic Development Manager 5.00% 3.20% 0.00% Emergency Services Coordinator 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Environmental Programs Manager 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Executive Assistant to the City Attorney 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% Executive Assistant To The City Manager 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% Finance Manager 5.00% 3.90% 0.00% GIS Program Manager 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Human Resources Analyst I 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Human Resources Assistant 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Human Resources Analyst II 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Human Resources Manager 5.00% 3.90% 0.00% Human Resources Technician 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Information Technology Assistant 4.40% 0.00% 0.00% Innovation and Technology Manager – Applications 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% 11/19/19 236 of 237 CC 7-16-1911.19.19, #16 39 Innovation and Technology Manager - Infrastructure 5.00% 5.00% 0.50% Legal Services Manager 1.80% 0.00% 0.00% Management Analyst 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Network Specialist 1.30% 0.00% 0.00% Park Restoration & Improvement Manager 5.00% 3.50% 0.00% Permit Center Manager 5.00% 2.80% 0.00% Planning Manager 5.00% 5.00% 1.80% Public Affairs Manager 5.00% 4.40% 0.00% Public Information Officer 2.70% 2.70% 0.00% Public Works Project Manager 5.00% 3.50% 0.00% Public Works Supervisor 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Recreation Manager 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Recreation Supervisor 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Senior Accountant 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% Senior Civil Engineer 4.00% 0.00% 0.00% Senior Management Analyst 5.00% 0.50% 0.00% Service Center Superintendent 5.00% 1.20% 0.00% Sustainability Manager 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Transportation Manager 4.00% 0.00% 0.00% Web Specialist 1.30% 0.00% 0.00% 11/19/19 237 of 237