ERC Packet 12-05-2019CITY OF CUPERTINO
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Conference Room C
Thursday, December 5, 2019
9:30 AM
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.Subject: Draft Minutes of August 1, 2019
Recommended Action: approve or modify the Draft Minutes of August 1, 2019
Draft Minutes of August 1, 2019
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the members on any matter not
on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the
members from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.Subject: Review of the Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan. The Master
Plan is a planning document intended to ensure that the City ’s park and recreation
system meets the needs of the Cupertino community, and to guide the City in
allocating resources for future development, renovation, and management of City park
and recreation facilities, through the year 2040. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is
proposed. Project Name: City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan;
Applicant(s): City of Cupertino; Location: citywide
Recommended Action: Conduct the Public Hearing and find:
1) That the Initial Study is appropriate for the Master Plan; and
2) Recommend that the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration
Parks & Recreation System Master Plan
Parks & Recreation System Master Plan Appendices
Parks & Recreation System Master Plan IS/MND
Parks & Recreation System Master Plan IS/MND Appendices
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
Page 1
Environmental Review Committee Agenda December 5, 2019
STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the
next meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance
should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for
assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings
distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative
format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use
during the meeting.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will
be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at
10300 Torre Avenue during normal business hours.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100
written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a
matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written
communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You
are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to
the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights
you may have on the information provided to the City .
Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the
notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the
members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment .
Page 2
Community Development Department
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
ACTION MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW COMMITTEE HELD ON August 1, 2019
Committee Members:Kitty Moore, Chair
Chad Mosley, Vice Chair
Ben Fu
Deborah Feng
Darcy Paul
Rhoda Fry, Member at Large
Committee Members absent:None
Staff present:Gian Martire, Associate Planner
Joseph Petta, Assistant City Attorney
Consultant Presenters:Carmen Borg AICP, Urban Planner, Shute, Mihaly &
Weinberger
Terri McKracken, Placeworks
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. July 18, 2019
The minutes of the July 18, 2019 were approved as written
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
(Reserved for persons wishing to address the Committee on issues that are not already
included in the regular Order of Business)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:None
STUDY SESSION:
2. Subject: Presentation of common CEQA documents and terms
Recommended Action: receive presentation and provide any input to Staff
Carmen Borg, from Shute Mihaly & Weinberger, went over the basics of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The objectives of CEQA are environmental protection,
disclosure, and public participation. There are CEQA regulations, guidelines and exceptions. She
provided informational resources and links to the Committee.
Additional Discussion
o Environmental Impacts are mitigated and avoided through project development
where possible
o Disclosure of environmental impacts to the “lead agency” (decision makers) and to
the public
o Public participation is the noticing requirements to the public and surrounding
agencies
o Courts are the ultimate arbitrators of CEQA interpretations
o CEQA only applies to discretionary projects
o What kinds of projects are Categorically Exempt, noticing requirements for
exemptions
o Negative Declaration - Initial Study indicates that the project poses no environmental
impacts
o Mitigated Negative Declaration – Initial Study indicates that the project poses some
potential environmental impacts that can mitigated to be less than significant
o Environmental Impact Report – a more detailed report than an Initial Study, indicates
that there may be substantial evidence of environment impacts. The Report includes
technical reports and alternative solutions for the project to reduce the potential
impacts.
o The definition of Cumulative Impacts
o Project cumulative impacts vs Citywide EIR, specific plan or program area EIRs
o Documentation names–Notice of Preparation, Notice of Intent, Notice of Availability,
Notice of Determination
The Committee asked for training materials (a summary of the presentation) available to future
Committee members, a table showing statutory authority, and another table showing the noticing
requirements for CEQA documents throughout the life of a project.
A resident spoke about the need for multi-city collaboration for projects at the edges of the City
PUBLIC HEARING:
3. Subject: Development and Use Permits to allow the construction of a 155-room hotel,
Architectural and Site approval for a 155-room hotel, Development Agreement and General
Plan Amendment for hotel allocation, height and setbacks. A Mitigated Negative Declaration
is proposed. Application No(s): ASA-2018-02, DA-2018-01, DP-2018-01, GPA-2018-01, U-2018-
02 (EA-2018-03); Applicant(s): Sherly Kwok (De Anza Properties); Location: 10931 N De Anza
Blvd. APN #326-10-061
Recommended Action: Conduct the public hearing to determine: 1) that the proposed
mitigations are not in conflict with the City’s General Plan; and 2) recommend to the City
Council the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
Geologic/Soils
o There will be a Stop Work Order in the construction documents should any remains
be discovered on site. The site will need to be cleared by a paleontologist before work
can continue.
o The soils report and geophysical survey did not indicate any hazardous contaminates
on site requiring mitigations
Hydrology
o The developer will have to provide evidence that the completed hotel will not exhaust
the City’s waste water systems
o The hotel meets all C3 requirements for storm water run off
Trees/Landscaping
o A nesting survey will be required prior to the start of any planned construction during
the spring months
o No site trees are proposed to be removed, approximately 12 trees will be added to the
site
Air Quality
o Standard mitigating measures will be in place during construction to reduce dust and
exhaust
o Dust from the construction trucks entering and leaving the site will need managed
o The developer will be required to pay a fee to “buy” voluntary carbon offsets (Green
House gases) as set and collected by the California Air Resources Board
Archeological/Cultural
o There will be a Stop Work Order in the construction documents should any remains
or artifacts be discovered on site. The site will need to be cleared by an archeologist or
tribal representative before work can continue.
Noise
o Any installed mechanical equipment will be required to meet the City’s Noise
Ordinance
o The applicant is aware of the City’s Noise Ordinance and permitted construction
hours
ACTION: Find that the proposed mitigations are not in conflict with the City’s General Plan; and
recommend that the City Council approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration for EA-
2018-03 and associated applications
MOTION: Ben Fu
SECOND: Chad Mosley
NOES: none
VOTE: 4-0-1 (Paul absent)
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS: None
STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
The City held a meeting at the Lehigh Cement Plant regarding their permits, reclamation
project, violations. City Staff, County Staff and various Local and State agency Staff were in
attendance.
ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
/s/Beth Ebben
Beth Ebben
Deputy Board Clerk
parks and
recreation
system
master plan
October 2019
city of
i
prepared by
October 2019
ii
Dear Residents of Cupertino,
It is my sincere pleasure to present this Parks and Recreation System Master Plan to the Cupertino
community. The plan represents a framework of opportunities that will guide City staff, Parks and
Recreation Commissioners and City Council to create a world-class parks and recreation system through
the year 2040 and beyond. In the City’s 55-year history, this is the first long-term plan developed to guide
the parks and recreation system. The plan outlines a path forward to expand quality of life for all members
of the Cupertino community.
Cupertino is a unique city in the heart of Silicon Valley. With a highly educated and diverse population, the
parks system should be just as unique and innovative. While land to build new parks is in short supply,
creativity is not. It is this sense of creativity and innovation that the City will need to rely on to improve its
parks system, to continue to offer the most important educational and recreation programs and to ensure
the most sustainable natural areas and open spaces.
This plan represents the efforts and input of thousands of community members, the Parks and Recreation
Commission, City Council members and staff. John Muir, perhaps our country’s most important
preservationist, wrote in 1873: that the mountains are calling, and I must go and study incessantly. Clearly,
he had a goal and saw the importance of planning to get to the top of his mountain. Following in the
tradition of Mr. Muir, this Master Plan sets out goals and important action items to guide our community in
reaching the highest level of park and recreation services.
Over the next 20 years, the City will need to react to changing conditions – demographics, technology and
environmental changes. This Master Plan was created to be resilient and malleable to answer the new
challenges that may lie ahead. The plan recognizes the many competing needs this City will face and
outlines a way of prioritizing what’s most important and what’s possible for our City. At the end of the
day, the Master Plan is a super set of ideas– opportunistic by definition. The Parks and Recreation
Commission, City staff, and community members will implement this plan in three-year, prioritized
strategic plans, the first to be published in 2020.
Cupertino is a vibrant city with beautiful parks and dynamic recreation opportunities. The many common
themes that emerged from this plan breed optimism and a bright future for the City’s parks and recreation
system.
Sincerely,
Jeff Milkes
Director of Parks and Recreation
Jeff Milkes
CITY COUNCIL
Steven Scharf, Mayor
Liang Chao, Vice Mayor
Darcy Paul, Council Member
Rod G. Sinks, Council Member
Jon Robert Willey, Council Member
Barry Chang (former)
Savita Vaidhyanathan (former)
Gilbert Wong (former)
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
Neesha Tambe, Chair
Gopal Kumarappan, Vice Chair
Helene Davis, Commissioner
Carol Stanek, Commissioner
Xiangchen ‘Minna’ Xu, Commissioner
Meenakshi Biyani (former)
David Fung (former)
Judy Wilson (former)
acknowledgements
We appreciate the guidance provided by City Council, Parks and Recreation
Commission and our Master Plan Advisory Group, as well as the involvement of City
staff , stakeholders, interest groups, and residents who have given their time, energy,
and ideas to this Master Plan.
iii
iv
MASTER PLAN ADVISORY GROUP
Lauv Aeron, Soccer, AYSO Region 35
Ritvik Banakar, Teen Commission alternate
Kinjal Buch, California Cricket Academy
Heather Dean, Cupertino Senior Center
Justin Duran, Creekside Community Church
Leigh Anne Gillis, Cupertino Girls Softball League
Ed Hirshfield, Cupertino Tennis Club
Kevin Jenkins, Cupertino Union School District
Steven Kaufman, Cupertino Union School District
Shani Kleinhaus, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society
Matt Miller, Blue Pheasant Hackers
Peggy Milovina, Fine Arts League of Cupertino
Don Phillips, Cupertino Little League
Jack Omen, Cupertino Block Leaders
Byron Rovegno, Walk-Bike Cupertino
Josh Selo, West Valley Community Services
Rachel Shahrivar, Fremont Union High School District
Nancy Sullivan, Fremont Union High School District
Keith Warner, Cupertino Chamber of Commerce
David Wei, Organization of Special Needs Families
Art Zimmerman, AYSO Region 64 and De Anza Youth Soccer League
Bob Colloton (former, Cupertino Senior Center)
Brandi Hucko (former, Garden Gate Elementary School, CUSD)
Mackenzie Mossing (former, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society)
CITY STAFF
Deborah Feng, City Manager
Jeff Milkes, Director, Parks and Recreation
Christine Hanel, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation
Roger Lee, Director, Public Works
Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager, Public Works
Timm Borden, Interim City Manager, Director of Public Works (former)
acknowledgements (continued)
v
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
v
Acknowledgments..................... iii
Executive Summary...................... xi
1 Introduction ................................1
Purpose of the Plan ................................1
Planning Process ................................2
Plan Organization ................................3
Park & Recreation System ...................4
2 Vision and Goals........................15
The Community ..............................15
Community Engagement Process..........16
Outreach Themes ..............................17
Master Plan Vision ..............................31
Master Plan Mission............................31
Master Plan Goals ..............................32
3 Systemwide Objectives & Actions......................................37
Conservation.......................................38
Connection..........................................46
Equitable Access..................................50
Enhancement.......................................56
Activity...............................................62
Quality ..............................................68
Sustainability.......................................76
4 Opportunity Highlights.................85
Enhancements to Existing Parks..................86
Enhancements to Existing Trails..................90
Potential Joint Use Opportunities................91
New Acquisitions.......................................92
Potential Major New Facilities....................93
Expanded Services .....................................96
Added Recreation Elements.........................97
Natural Vegetation Enhancements.............. 99
5 Implementation ..............................103
Implementing Early Action Initiatives........ 103
Advancing Additional Recreation Elements 108
Advancing Major Projects.........................109
Funding the Vision ...................................113
Prioritizing Capital Projects ......................113
Moving Forward ......................................115
Appendices
Appendix A: Park & Facility Inventory................A-1
Appendix B: Recreation Programs Overview.........B-1
Appendix C: Community Engagement Methodology .....................................................................C-1
Appendix D: Park Access and Opportunity Maps..D-1
Appendix E: Park Site Overviews........................... E-1
Appendix F: Opportunities and Costs....................F-1
Appendix G: Potential Funding Sources................G-1
Appendix H: Project Prioritization Tools ..............H-1
contents
vi
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
List of Figures
Figure 1: Parks and Recreation System Planning Process
Figure 2: City Parks by Classification
Figure 3: City Parks Inventory
Figure 4: Recreation Facilities
Figure 5: Key Groups and Input Opportunities
Figure 6: Key Themes From Community Outreach
Figure 7: Nature Receives the Most and Strongest Support of the Priority Goals for the Parks and Recreation
System
Figure 8: Preferred Opportunities to Improve Trails and Connectivity
Figure 9: Preferred Opportunities to Provide Extraordinary Play Opportunities
Figure 10: Diverse Interests in Eight Types of Programming Enhancements
Figure 11: Preferred Options to Incorporate Teen Empowerment in Cupertino Parks and Recreation
Figure 12: High Expectations and High Satisfaction Levels are Both Noted in Outreach Findings
Figure 13: Preferred Options to Enhance Parks and Recreation Facilities to Reflect Cupertino’s Unique
Character and Identity
Figure 14: Preferred Partnership Opportunities in Cupertino Parks and Recreation
Figure 15: Preferred Options to Address Cupertino’s Cultural Diversity Through Parks and Recreation Services
Figure B-1: Sites Where Programs are Currently Offered
vii
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
List of Tables
Table 1: Planning Level Costs for Potential Major New or Expanded Facilities
Table 2: Funding Sources & Their Use
Table A-1: Cupertino Park & Facility Inventory Matrix
Table A-2: Major Recreation Buildings/ Facilities That Are Programmed by Parks and Recreation
Table B-1: Existing Program Service Areas Overview
Table B-2: Participation in City Programs
Table F-1: Site Opportunities for Parks and School Fields Managed by City
Table F-2: New Major Park & Recreation Facility Opportunities
Table F-3: Opportunities for Added Recreation Elements
Table G-1: 2019-2023 City of Cupertino Capital Improvement Program Summary
List of Maps
Map 1: Existing Parks, Open Space and Recreation Resources
Map D-1: Opportunity to Foster Natural Systems
Map D-2: Opportunity to Enhance Pedestrian and Bike Connectivity
Map D-3: Access to All Public Park Acreage within a 10-minute Walk
Map D-4: Access to Neighborhood-Serving Park Acreage within a 10-minute Walk
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
xi
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
the future of parks
and recreation
Cupertino is an innovative city located at the west
end of the world-famous Silicon Valley. Here,
corporate headquarters blend with family-friendly
parks and tree-shrouded neighborhoods that climb
into the foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains.
Technologically savvy and rich in diversity, our
community is noted for its excellence in education,
innovation and community livability.
Cupertino’s parks and recreation system is integral
to both the fabric or our city and the spirit of
our community. Our parks offer green space,
respite, and protected natural resources, as well
as facilities, programs and events that support
community celebrations, health, and lifelong
learning. However, our parks system faces several
unique challenges. Our high expectations,
evolving needs, high land costs, and multi-cultural
character influence how park and recreation
services are provided now and will be provided in
the future.
This Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
(Master Plan) responds to these challenges.
It integrates our vision and aspirations into a
cohesive strategy to guide the future development,
renovation, management and programming of our
City’s parks and recreation facilities. The Master
Plan will provide direction for the City and Parks
and Recreation Department as it improves and
enhances parks and recreation through the year
2040.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
xii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
our community’s
expectations
Community preferences, priorities and
expectations underpin every recommendation in
this Master Plan. As the plan was developed—
between 2015 and 2018—residents, stakeholders,
partners, businesses, elected officials, staff,
youth, and people of diverse cultures were
invited to share their aspirations for the parks
and recreation system. More than an estimated
2,000 community members provided their input
and feedback through varied online and in-
person activities.
Our community identified 12 themes to focus
on and address through new policies and
projects. These include improving park and
facility access and trail connectivity, as well as
integrating nature, the arts, and extraordinary
play opportunities. Residents want a greater
variety of recreation options, plus welcoming,
customer-friendly parks and services that reflect
the community’s diverse culture and unique
characteristics. Empowering youth and teens,
supporting social gatherings, and collaborating
with partners and stakeholders round out the
priorities noted through community feedback.
From this community input, the Master Plan’s
vision, mission and goals were defined to guide
the City in enhancing recreation opportunities
for all Cupertino residents.
xiii
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
KEY THEMES FROM COMMUNITY OUTREACH
xiv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
our guiding vision, mission and goals
We aspire to create an inspiring, lively,
healthy, diverse and sustainable community
by connecting our residents to outstanding
parks, nature and one another.
Cupertino:
•PROMOTES parks and public spaces as
integral elements of our City’s character;
•RESTORES, preserves, and protects our
creeks, meadows, trees and natural areas;
•ENGAGES our diverse residents in healthy,
inclusive events and activities; and
•CREATES a safe, connected, walkable and
welcoming community.
MASTER PLAN VISION
MASTER PLAN MISSION
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
xv
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MP1. CONSERVATION Protect nature, trees and natural areas
in parks and throughout the city to support wildlife, ecological
functions and a stronger connection to Cupertino’s natural
environment.
MP2. CONNECTION Provide an interconnected network of
multiuse trails, walkways and bikeways, close-to-home parks,
and community destinations.
MP3. EQUITABLE ACCESS Distribute parks and facilities
throughout the community for easy and equitable access.
MP4. ENHANCEMENT Reinvigorate and revitalize parks and
recreation facilities to support broad and inclusive recreation
interests.
MP5. ACTIVITY Provide programs, events and services that
foster social cohesiveness and lively, diverse activities for
people of all ages, abilities, cultures, and interests.
MP6. QUALITY Create high quality recreation experiences,
places and services that are welcoming, safe, responsive,
comfortable and reflective of Cupertino’s unique character.
MP7. SUSTAINABILITY Provide, manage and maintain parks,
facilities, programs and services through sound management
and stewardship, sustainable choices and the wise use of
resources.
MASTER PLAN GOALS
xvi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master planEXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
1 The Background: Introduction
Why do we plan? We developed this Master
Plan to align our parks and recreation services
with community expectations, to identify
the key projects that will transform our
community, and to help ensure we have the
resources needed to create a parks system that
embodies Cupertino’s unique identity and
diversity. As noted in Chapter 1, opportunities
and challenges must be addressed when
renovating City parks, trails, creek corridors,
sports fields and recreation facilities to serve
residents, employees and visitors, through the
year 2040.
2 Our Community’s Aspirations:
Vision & Goals
An estimated 2,000 public participants and
extensive input helped define our vision,
mission, and goals, as well as community
expectations to enhance and improve our
parks, facilities, programs and services.
Residents articulated 12 clear themes, as
defined in Chapter 2, as well as seven goals
that provide the foundation for the policies and
projects noted in the Master Plan.
3 The 2040 Plan: Systemwide
Objectives & Actions
What actions will Cupertino take to support
Conservation, Connection, Equitable
Access, Enhancement, Activity, Quality, and
Sustainability in our parks and programs?
Chapter 3 redefines our standards, identifies
action items, and notes in detail our objectives
for enhancing and increasing our investment in
our parks and recreation system.
snapshot of the master plan
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
xvii
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 Transformative Projects:
Opportunities Highlights
Evolving recreation trends, changing
community dynamics, and aging assets will
affect our existing parks system through
the year 2040, and there will be a need for
expanded services. Chapter 4 highlights key
projects with the potential to transform existing
parks and recreation; expand current joint use
opportunities and partnerships; acquire or add
new parks, major new facilities, and a variety
of recreation elements; expand services for
teens and seniors; and protect and augment
natural resources and nature in parks. It
features the selected key projects from the full
list of opportunities that appear in Appendix F.
5 Steps to Success:
Implementation
With strong advisory group advocacy
on behalf of the parks system and clear
community expectations for better parks and
recreation services, the City of Cupertino
recognizes the importance of implementing
the most critical, innovative actions to support
community livability. Chapter 5 describes the
early action initiatives already underway, the
pilot projects anticipated to diversify recreation
elements, capital resources needed for major
facility development, and the decision-
making still needed to develop new parks and
facilities. The chapter identifies funding and
prioritization strategies to sequence future
capital projects.
xviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master planEXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Appendices A-H: Data and Details
The extensive, transparent Master Plan process
included substantial data gathering and
analysis along the way. In addition to several
reports completed independently by City staff,
MIG, Inc., and other professionals, Master
Plan appendices consolidate the data, tools and
information necessary to implement the plan.
These include:
•Appendix A: Park & Facility Inventory
•Appendix B: Recreation Programs
Overview
•Appendix C: Community Engagement
Methodology
•Appendix D: Park Access and Opportunity
Maps
•Appendix E: Park Site Overviews
•Appendix F: Opportunities and Costs
•Appendix G: Potential Funding Sources
•Appendix H: Project Prioritization Tools
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
xix
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
investing in our future
This Master Plan captures our community’s vision and articulates
a realistic approach for enhancing our parks, facilities and
recreation opportunities. By moving forward with several
early action initiatives, the City is already demonstrating its
responsiveness to community priorities and its intent to implement
this Master Plan.
The City of Cupertino must invest wisely in funding the vision
for new parks, facilities, programs and events. This will require
proactive planning to identify the right locations, partnerships
and mix of features to include in revenue-generating major
facilities. It will also require the strategic expansion of existing
funding resources, as well as the exploration of new ones to have
the funding necessary to care for park assets, steward natural
resources, and activate parks, while adding new recreation
elements, major facilities, trails and neighborhood parks. Above
all, it will require focus, collaboration and innovation as we create
the types of parks, facilities and programs that are integral to
becoming a model multicultural and livable community for the
21st century.
INTRODUCTION
1
1
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER ONE
purpose of the plan
Cupertino is a progressive and highly desirable
hometown for people and businesses in Silicon
Valley. The City is known for its excellent public
schools, parks, and a culturally diverse community
that artfully blends innovation with inspiration,
collaboration and community livability. It is also
known as the home of successful businesses,
including the headquarters of Apple, Inc.
The City’s parks and recreation system is a refuge
for residents, offering green space, respite and
protected natural resources, as well as facilities,
programs and events that support community
celebrations, sports and other activities. As the
City’s population has become more diverse over
time, the parks and recreation system has evolved
more slowly. City parks have remained traditional,
creating opportunities to integrate a greater degree
of ingenuity, accessibility and originality into
various parks, programs and activities—while
retaining the beloved amenities and characteristics
of the parks and recreation system.
The City began developing a new Parks and
Recreation System Master Plan (Master Plan) to
proactively create a parks system for the future
that is aligned with the community’s dynamic
values and priorities. The Master Plan integrates
the community’s vision and aspirations into a
cohesive strategy to guide the future development,
renovation, management and programming of
City parks and recreation facilities. The Master
Plan will provide direction for the City and Parks
and Recreation Department and for improvements
to the parks and recreation system through the
year 2040.
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND STUDIES
This Master Plan incorporated
relevant data and policies
from several documents:
▪General Plan (2015)
▪ADA Self-Evaluation and
Transition Plan (2015)
▪Bicycle Transportation Plan (2016)
▪Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018)
INTRODUCTION
1
2
INTRODUCTION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
planning process
The planning process provided residents a
chance to re-imagine current and future park and
recreation opportunities. An extensive public
engagement process helped assess community
needs and priorities, while identifying
opportunities to meet those needs in the future.
An estimated 2,000 community members
provided their input and feedback through a
dozen varied online and in-person activities.
The planning process also identified the broad
community support to preserve and enhance
recreation, walkability, access to open spaces, and
Cupertino’s sense of place and quality of life.
The project team designed a multi-phased
planning process to develop a comprehensive
and innovative Master Plan that reflects the
community’s aspirations (Figure 1). In 2015, the
City initiated a public outreach effort and began
evaluating demographics, trends, policies, parks,
facilities and programs to provide a foundation
of information for subsequent analysis. Initial
findings were discussed with City Council, the
Parks and Recreation Commission, the Parks
and Recreation Management Team and a Master
Plan Advisory Group to ensure the plan reflected
community priorities. Subsequent phases built
upon this initial feedback and assessments to
create Master Plan goals, opportunities and an
action plan for the future.
FIGURE 1: PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM PLANNING PROCESS
Project
Initiation &
Outreach
Trends,
Demographics
& Policy Review
Existing
Systems
Inventory &
Assessment
Interpretation
of Key Planning
Directions
Plan Adoption
Plan Development & Refinement
Master Plan Goals & Opportunities
Community Needs & Opportunities Assessment
3
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER ONE
In addition to input collected through extensive
outreach and engagement efforts, the Master
Plan draws from several studies completed as
part of the planning process:
•Demographics Analysis
•Trends Analysis
•Existing Parks and Facilities Summary
•Recreation Program Overview & Analysis
•Community Outreach & Vision Summary
plan organization
Chapter 1: Introduction provides an overview
of the planning process, the existing parks and
recreation system, and plan organization.
Chapter 2: Vision and Goals details the
community engagement process and outreach
themes that informed the Master Plan’s vision,
mission, and goals.
Chapter 3: Systemwide Objectives and Actions
identifies recommended actions to enhance and
manage the parks and recreation system.
Chapter 4: Opportunities Highlights presents
key opportunities for existing City parks, new
major facilities and added recreation elements.
Chapter 5: Implementation summarizes the
type of funding investment needed, identifies
the process by which capital projects can be
prioritized, and provides highlights of key
initiatives already moving forward.
A series of appendices provides technical
documentation.
Appendix A: Park & Facility Inventory
summarizes and classifies park and facility data
associated with sites in the existing parks system.
Appendix B: Recreation Programs Overview
summarizes the Department’s existing programs
and events, documenting current services and
participation.
Appendix C: Community Engagement
Methodology describes the approach and key
tasks associated with the public outreach effort.
Appendix D: Park Access and Opportunity
Maps presents a series of analysis maps for
parks, trails and natural areas that informed the
development of planning objectives and actions.
Appendix E: Park Site Overviews describes sites
in the City’s park system, noting existing
amenities and facilities, any recent or planned
improvements, and opportunities for future site
enhancements.
Appendix F: Opportunities and Costs presents
three opportunities matrices and identifies the
cost assumptions and cost estimates for facilities.
Appendix G: Potential Funding Sources
provides an overview of existing funding sources
and presents options for enhancing existing
funds and adding new funding sources.
Appendix H: Project Prioritization Tools
presents a checklist and sequencing criteria
to assist in screening and prioritizing future
projects.
4
INTRODUCTION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
the park & recreation
system
The City of Cupertino owns or manages 224
acres of parks, trails, creek corridors, sports
fields and recreation facilities at 32 sites. These
include a variety of parks ranging from smaller
neighborhood parks to large parks that attract
people from across the community. Residents
also benefit from nearby Santa Clara County
parks, open space preserves, and other local
parks and recreation resources owned and
managed by other providers. (See Appendix A.)
Figure 2 and Map 1 illustrate the different types
of parks and their distribution. The City has two
“community parks”: Memorial Park and Stevens
Creek Corridor Park. For purposes of this Master
Plan, Stevens Creek Corridor Park (SCCP)
includes the continuous lands along Stevens
Creek from McClellan Road to Stevens Creek
Boulevard, which are owned by the City and
Water District. SCCP includes multiple facilities,
such as Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry
Farm Park, McClellan Ranch Preserve,
McClellan Ranch West, and Stocklmeir Ranch.
Together, City parks contain traditional park
amenities such as sports fields, sports courts,
restrooms and playgrounds. Cupertino’s
parks are well-maintained, with standardized
landscapes and facilities. Many are decades old
and could do more to integrate natural resources
and habitat. Some newer parks, such as Sterling
Barnhart, provide newer design features, and the
Environmental Education Center in McClellan
Ranch Preserve in Stevens Creek Corridor Park
is a state-of-the-art green building.
City parks and facilities are also home to
countless events and programs offered in a
variety of different program service areas,
ranging from Aquatics to Lifelong Learning &
Enrichment. (See Appendix B.) Within the parks
system, nine indoor facilities support recreation
and community activities:
•Portal Park Building
•Creekside Park Building
•Wilson Park Ceramic Center
•Environmental Education Center
•Monta Vista Recreation Center
•Quinlan Community Center
•Senior Center
•Sports Center
•Community Hall
In 2017, an estimated more than 347,000 people
participated in recreation programs. Of these,
approximately 60,000 attended community
events based in Cupertino’s parks.
5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
CalabazasPark
WestwoodOaks Park
MurdockPark
RainbowPark SaratogaCreek Park
MaywoodPark
JennyStrandPark
JohnMisePark
GrantPark
OrtegaPark
SerraPark
RaynorPark
SARATOGA
SAN JOSE
SUNNYVALE
LOS ALTOS
SANTA
CLARA
Stevens
Creek
Reservoir
SAN JOSE
Homestead Rd
Lawrence ExpwyStelling RdStevens Creek Blvd
McClellan Rd
Bubb RdS
t
e
v
en
s
C
a
n
y
on
R
d Foothill BlvdFo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
Pierce RdSaratoga Sunnyvale RdSunnyvale Saratoga RdDe Anza BlvdQuito RdBlaney AveWolfe RdMiller AveBollinger Rd
Rainbow Dr
Prospect Rd
Blackberry Farm Park
MemorialPark
Kennedy MiddleSchool
CreeksidePark
Hyde MiddleSchool
LindaVistaPark
Blackberry FarmGolf Course
CollinsElementary
EatonElementary
FariaElementary
Varian Park
LincolnElementary
RegnartElementary
Jollyman Park
WilsonPark
Hoover Park
Garden GateElementary
Stevens CreekElementary
PortalPark
StocklmeirRanch
LibraryField
Sports Center
Three OaksPark
Monta Vista RecreationCenter & Park
McClellanRanch West
SomersetPark
Franco Park
Mary AveDog ParkCanyonOakPark
LittleRanchoPark
SterlingBarnhartPark
Community Hall
De AnzaCollege
StevensCreekCounty Park
Fremont OlderOpen SpacePreservePicchetti RanchOpen SpacePreserve
RanchoSan AntonioCounty ParkRanchoSan AntonioOpen SpacePreserve
StevensCreekCounty Park
Deep CliffGolf Course
CupertinoHigh School
HomesteadHigh School
LawsonMiddleSchool
MontaVistaHighSchoolMcClellanRanch Preserve RanchoRinconada
CivicPark CupertinoLibrary
Cali MillPlaza
SedgwickElementary
TownSquare
Main StreetPark
SCVWDPercolationPond
Cupertino CityCenter ParkCity Hall
LynbrookHigh School
MillerMiddleSchool
CupertinoMiddleSchool
ArchbishopMitty HighSchool
West ValleyElementary
NimitzElementary
DilworthElementaryMeyerholzElementary Murdock-PortalElementary
De VargasElementary
EisenhowerElementary
StocklmeirElementary Calabazas CreekSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanente CreekPr
o
s
p
e
c
t
C
r
e
e
k
Junipero Serra Channel
Swiss Creek Heney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaRegnart CreekStevens CreekRecreation Centers/Fields
Recreation Centers/Facilities
Other Facilities
Parks & Recreation
System Master Plan
Base Map Features
Cupertino City Boundary
Cupertino Sphere of Influence *
Railroad
Creeks and Channels
Water Bodies
Note: * per Local Agency Formation Commission
February 2018
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.50.125
Miles
Sources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.
Schools and Colleges
Golf Course (private ownership)
Other Recreation Resources
Local Parks Open to Public
County Parks & Regional Open Space Preserves
Shared-Use Paths
Cupertino Parks and Trails
Community Parks
Large Neighborhood Parks
Small Neighborhood Parks
Special Use Sites
School Fields Managed by City
Map 1:
Existing Parks, Open Space
and Recreation Resources
6
INTRODUCTION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
FIGURE 2: CITY PARKS BY CLASSIFICATION
CITY PARKS
COMMUNITY PARKS | 2 sites | 85.8 total acres
Examples: Memorial Park, Stevens Creek Corridor
Park
Definition: Community parks are larger parks (20+ acres) that provide unique recreation opportunities and serve the entire community. These parks consist of a single contiguous site or several functionally- and geographically-linked use areas that provide a variety of recreation facilities. They typically include specialized facilities and space for large group gatherings, programming and events.
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS | 8 sites | 66.4 total acres
Examples: Creekside Park, Jollyman Park, Wilson Park
Definition: Large neighborhood parks, varying between 4 acres and 13 acres in size, provide a range of passive and active recreation opportunities for surrounding neighborhoods. They typically include play areas, picnic areas, open lawn areas, and sports courts. Several also include programmable and reservable facilities, such as sports fields and small recreation centers.
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS | 6 sites | 6.8 total acres
Examples: Little Rancho Park, Sterling Barnhart Park
Definition: Small neighborhood parks provide
essential recreation opportunities for nearby
neighbors. Typically less than 3 acres in size, these
parks may include play areas, open lawn areas, and
picnic tables/benches. Some include sports courts.
SPECIAL USE SITES | 5 sites | 10.7 total acres
Examples: Civic Center Plaza, Mary Avenue
Dog Park, Cupertino Sports Center
Definition: Special use sites support unique recreation
opportunities serving all or most of the Cupertino
community. These single-purpose sites may
include specialized recreation facilities not found
elsewhere in the parks system. Urban plazas, civic
space, dog parks and sports complexes (without
other uses) are considered special use sites.
SCHOOL SPORTS FIELDS | 9 sites | 45.5 total acres
Examples: Eaton Elementary, Lincoln
Elementary, Kennedy Middle School
Definition: This category includes sports fields at nine school sites managed through a joint use agreement. These sports fields provide additional recreational opportunities to the community when not in use by the schools.
TRAIL CORRIDORS | 4 sites | 8.8 total acres
Examples: Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge & Trail,
Saratoga Creek Trail (acreage excludes Stevens Creek Trail)
Definition: Trail corridors include trails and associated greenways that link destinations in the community. These typically are single-purpose linear features not located within parks of other types. These trails may extend beyond Cupertino and connect to surrounding cities and regional trail systems.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER ONE
7
FIGURE 3:
CITY PARKS INVENTORY
CITY OWNED OR MANAGED PARKS AND FACILITIES
SITE ACREAGE
COMMUNITY PARKS
Memorial Park 22.1
Quinlan Community Center
Senior Center
Stevens Creek Corridor Park (SCCP)
Blackberry Farm Golf Course 16.4
Blackberry Farm Park 19.7
McClellan Ranch Preserve 13.0
McClellan Ranch West 3.1
Stocklmeir Ranch 5.1
Other property in SCCP 6.4
Community Parks Subtotal 85.8
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Creekside Park 13.0
Hoover Park 5.0
Jollyman Park 11.2
Linda Vista Park 11.0
Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center 6.2
Portal Park 3.8
Varian Park 6.3
Wilson Park 9.9
Large Neighborhood Parks Subtotal 66.4
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Canyon Oak Park 0.6
Franco Park 0.6
Little Rancho Park 0.3
Somerset Park 1.7
Sterling Barnhart Park 0.5
Three Oaks Park 3.1
Small Neighborhood Parks Subtotal 6.8
SPECIAL USE SITES
Civic Center
Civic Center Plaza 1.0
Community Hall -
Library Field 3.0
Mary Avenue Dog Park 0.5
Cupertino Sports Center 6.2
Special Use Sites Subtotal 10.7
8
INTRODUCTION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
CITY OWNED OR MANAGED PARKS AND FACILITIES
SITE ACREAGE
TRAIL CORRIDORS
Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge & Trail 4.0
Creekside Park and Regnart Creek Trail 0.1
Saratoga Creek Trail 4.7
Stevens Creek Trail -
Trail Corridors Subtotal 8.8
SCHOOL FIELDS (MANAGED BY CITY)
Collins Elementary School 2.5
Eaton Elementary School 4.5
Faria Elementary School 4.2
Garden Gate Elementary School 2.9
Hyde Middle School 7.8
Kennedy Middle School 13.3
Lincoln Elementary School 3.1
Regnart Elementary School 4.1
Stevens Creek Elementary School 3.1
School Fields Subtotal 45.5
Total City Parks and Facilities 224.0
OTHER RECREATION RESOURCES
LOCAL PARKS AND RECREATION RESOURCES
Cali Mill Plaza 1.0
Civic Park [at Town Center Lane]0.5
Cupertino City Center Park (and Amphitheater)1.1
Main Street Park 0.8
Rancho Rinconada 1.5
SCVWD Percolation Pond 5.0
Town Square [at Main Street]0.7
Subtotal Local Parks and Resources 10.6
COUNTY PARKS AND REGIONAL OPEN SPACE PRESERVES
Fremont Older Open Space Preserve*~739
Rancho San Antonio County Park & Preserve*~4,153
Stevens Creek County Park*~1,070
Subtotal County Parks and
Regional Preserves 5,962.0
Total Other Recreation Resources ~5,972.6
FIGURE 3:
CITY PARKS INVENTORY (CONT.)
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER ONE
9
FIGURE 4: RECREATION FACILITIES
NUMBER OF CITY OWNED OR MANAGED
SITES WITH THESE TYPES OF FACILITIES
Athletic Facilities
12 with Baseball/Softball Fields
12 with Soccer Fields
5 with Basketball Hoops
4 with Tennis Courts
1 with Cricket Field
1 with Volleyball Court
Outdoor Recreation Facilities
17 with Playgrounds
14 with Picnic Areas
13 with Open Field/Lawn Areas
2 with Water Play
1 with Amphitheater
1 with Community Gardens
1 with Horseshoe Pits
1 with Swimming Pools
Indoor Facilities
8 with Recreation Buildings
5 with Other Buildings
Trails/Natural Areas
4 with Trails
3 with Natural Areas
Amenities
16 with Restrooms
11 with Barbecue Grills
6 with Concessions
4 with Wi-Fi
4 with Reservable Picnic Areas
10
INTRODUCTION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
planning context
The City of Cupertino is an innovative city
with unique challenges and considerations that
affect a parks and recreation system master
plan. Generally speaking, this is a community
of high expectations, evolving needs, and city
characteristics that influence how park and
recreation needs are currently met and will
continue to be addressed in the future.
The City of Cupertino celebrates the cultural
diversity and unique demographic makeup of
its community. Based on the 2017 Community
Survey Report by Godbe Research, 64% of the
population identifies as Asian, including 33%
of the population identifying as Chinese and
18% identifying as Indian. Residents are highly
educated, with 74% holding bachelor’s, graduate
or professional degrees. Not surprisingly,
Cupertino is a community that prides itself on
providing exceptional educational opportunities
and supporting the achievement of its teen and
youth community. Most residents (78%) live in
family households, and currently, there are a
large percentage of households with children.
However, the numbers of children are expected
to decline over time while numbers of older
adults and retirees will increase, changing
recreation needs in the future. Supporting the
overall well-being of Cupertino’s youth as well
as serving the increasing number of elders are
both priorities for the community—as is serving
residents of all ages, interests, abilities and needs.
Recreation programs, events and facilities must
be family-friendly and highly diverse to serve
the City’s population.
11
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER ONE
Cupertino also is a growing community. The
current population of 62,545 residents is projected
to increase 7.4% over the next 20 years. This
means that 71,200 residents may live in Cupertino
by 2040 (Association of Bay Area Governments).
This will add to the existing demands and needs
for parks, recreation facilities and programs.
Finally, Cupertino is a built-out city, with
little or no open space available to acquire as
park land. Land is extremely expensive, and a
regional housing shortage creates a competing
need for land, including undeveloped and
redeveloping areas. This combination of factors
makes prospects for adding new parks and large
facilities challenging and critically important as
some new housing is anticipated to be higher
density with less outdoor space.
As a result of the lack of undeveloped land,
new recreation facilities are expected to be built
primarily in existing parks or in collaboration
at partner sites. In existing City parks, the
addition of new facilities has the potential to
displace existing open space and facilities or
sport fields. The growing population will also
increase the demands on existing parks, sparking
competing uses and increasing maintenance
costs. For this reason, any potential projects
must be considered carefully in the context
of the community’s vision and priorities, and
innovative and creative solutions will be needed
to serve residents in the future.
VISION & GOALS
2
15
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
the community
Since 2015, the City of Cupertino has collected
insights from community members and
stakeholders to shape the Parks and Recreation
System Master Plan (Master Plan). A robust
community engagement process was critical to
defining the community’s vision and aspirations
for the future. Following a short overview of the
community and community engagement process,
this chapter summarizes the key themes heard
through community feedback that were used to
develop the City’s vision, mission, and goals for
parks and recreation.
VISION & GOALS
2
16
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
community
engagement process
To ensure that the Master Plan reflects the
priorities of a diverse community and that the
parks and recreation system effectively serves
all residents, a robust community outreach
and engagement process involved four key
groups and many different community input
opportunities. (See Appendix C for details.)
KEY GROUPS
Four groups provided ongoing
guidance for the Master Plan
▪City Council
▪Parks and Recreation
Commission
▪Master Plan Advisory Group
▪Parks and Recreation
Management Team
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER
INPUT OPPORTUNITIES
More than 2,000 participants
were estimated to be involved
in the following activities:
▪Citywide Survey
▪Intercept Events
▪Stakeholder interviews
▪Public Community
Workshop
▪Block Leader Workshop
▪Council and Community
Leader Interviews
▪Recreation Staff
Focus Group
▪Vision and Goals
Questionnaire
▪Parks and Recreation
Commission-hosted
Community Workshops
▪Parks and Recreation
Commission Meetings
▪City Council Meetings
or Study Sessions
▪Draft Plan Review Meetings
FIGURE 5:
KEY GROUPS AND INPUT
OPPORTUNITIES
17
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
outreach themes
Through thousands of comments, Cupertino
residents articulated 12 clear priorities and
aspirations for City parks, trails, natural
areas, programs and events. These key themes
were integrated into the vision, goals and
opportunities that will shape the future of
Cupertino’s parks and recreation system.
FIGURE 6: KEY THEMES FROM COMMUNITY OUTREACH
18
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Nature Experience
Community members
want more opportunities to
connect to nature.
Expanding access to nature is a top priority
for the community. Throughout all outreach
activities, participants consistently favored
incorporating nature and increasing access
to natural open space over other potential
enhancements. Community priorities include
improving or restoring creeks, meadows, and
wildlife habitat in existing parks, as well as
planting more trees and native plants in public
spaces. Stakeholders, Council members and
residents noted the importance of environmental
education and nature programs in connecting
people to nature. Gardening and nature play
were seen as additional opportunities to connect
to nature. As the City renovates its parks,
residents would like to see a decreased emphasis
on large lawn areas and more focus on retaining
a site’s natural character. City parks could
better highlight existing natural amenities and
tree cover, adding to the City’s overall “natural
capital.”
85% of Citywide Survey respondents noted that improving access to natural open space is needed
FIGURE 7: NATURE RECEIVES THE MOST AND STRONGEST SUPPORT OF THE
PRIORITY GOALS FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM
(VISION AND GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE)
19
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
Trails & Connectivity
Residents value trails and
desire more opportunities
for walking and biking in
Cupertino.
Residents, stakeholders and Council members all
expressed a desire to build a connected network
of trails and paths in Cupertino. Residents value
trails for recreation and fitness and as places to
hike with friends and family, walk their dogs,
exercise, and experience nature. To reduce traffic
congestion and increase mobility options, many
residents recommended the City develop a
comprehensive network for biking and walking,
linking parks to neighborhoods and other
destinations. Stakeholders also recommended
providing amenities such as pathway mile
markers, bike parking, bike repair stations and
water bottle fill-up stations to promote active
(i.e., non-motorized) transportation.
Outreach respondents would like to see City
trails connected to regional trails and nearby
County parks and open space preserves. Many
residents recommended extending Stevens Creek
Trail to link to county land and open space areas.
Residents value diversity in terms of trail types,
such as jogging paths, loop trails, bike trails,
guided hikes, and interpretive trails.
FIGURE 8: PREFERRED OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE TRAILS AND CONNECTIVITY
(VISION AND GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE)*
80% of Citywide Survey participants favor adding trails and pathways
*In figures 8, 9, 11, 13, 14 and 15, questionnaire respondents could choose up to two responses from a list of six to eight
options. The percentage noted reflects the percentage of respondents that chose this option.
20
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Park & Facility Access
Residents want easy,
enhanced access to
parks and recreation
opportunities.
Providing better pedestrian and bike connections
is the community’s preferred strategy to enhance
access to recreation opportunities. Residents
also recommend providing park land and trails
in underserved areas, and creating accessible
and inclusive play areas. The eastern side of
Cupertino was identified as an area in need of
improved access to recreation opportunities. In
other areas, lack of parking and poor bike and
pedestrian accessibility were identified as the
top barriers preventing residents from using City
parks.
The provision of amenities such as restrooms and
benches are additional ways to improve park
use and make parks more accessible to families,
seniors and others in the community. Residents
also expressed interest in adding year-round
sports and aquatics facilities, and some field
sports teams favor all-weather artificial turf
fields. Overall, many residents highlighted the
importance of ensuring that facilities continue to
be accessible to families with children, residents
with special needs, and older adults.
Needs for quality neighborhood parks, similar to Sterling Barnhart park, were noted
in east and north Cupertino. (Council and Community Leader Interviews)
21
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
Social Gathering & Celebration
Residents appreciate
community events and
would like to see more
spaces in Cupertino for
bringing people together.
Cupertino parks, programs and events play an
important role in connecting residents socially.
Many residents would like to see the City
organize more neighborhood events, such as
concerts and movies at neighborhood parks.
Providing additional smaller events serving
different neighborhoods is more favored than
creating more citywide community events.
Nonetheless, stakeholders and other residents
support and noted the popularity of citywide
events and festivals, such as the Big Bunny run,
Harvest Festival, Diwali and 4th of July events.
Residents would like to see additional spaces
that could increase the variety and size of
community-serving events. Residents also value
increased opportunities for outdoor health and
fitness events, such as races, walkathons or park
boot camps. Overall, residents hope to see more
community events and activities to celebrate the
strong sense of community in Cupertino.
Special events are selected as the most popular type
of program enhancement. (Intercept Events)
52% of Questionnaire respondents want small events in neighborhood parks, such as movies in the park, neighborhood-scale concerts and recreation activities
22
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Extraordinary Play
Cupertino desires a
variety of play
experiences for all
ages and abilities.
Diversifying play experiences emerged as a
priority for residents across all engagement
efforts. Participants stressed the importance of
providing play opportunities for all age groups,
from children to seniors, and ensuring they are
accessible to people of all abilities. Community
members would like to see enhanced water,
nature and adventure play by providing
specialized amenities to support those play
experiences. Residents also highlighted the
need to look beyond modular and traditional
playgrounds, by adding unstructured and
diverse play opportunities, such as climbing
towers, water play, and play equipment for
people of every ability level.
50% of Questionnaire respondents think the City should support more play opportunities for all age groups
FIGURE 9: PREFERRED OPPORTUNITIES TO PROVIDE EXTRAORDINARY PLAY
OPPORTUNITIES (VISION AND GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE)
23
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
Recreation Variety
Residents and visitors
desire a wide range of
recreation options.
Cupertino is a diverse community with a keen
interest in diverse recreation. Outreach findings
indicate that residents expect a greater variety
of recreation options, including unique, high-
quality attractions for residents and visitors. The
wide range of recreation interests includes a need
for different types of facilities and programs that
support visual and performing arts, nature and
environmental education, sports and fitness, and
more. Community members want to see different
types of facilities that go beyond standard
recreation offerings, such as non-traditional,
multi-purpose facilities.
Community members recommended adding
varied facilities such as a parcourse, outdoor
exercise equipment, and moveable seating to
City parks, as well as traditional elements such
as basketball courts.
74% of Questionnaire respondents believe that having a greater variety of facilities and programs is important
FIGURE 10: DIVERSE INTERESTS IN EIGHT TYPES OF PROGRAMMING
ENHANCEMENTS (CITYWIDE SURVEY)
Performing, visual,
cultural arts
Classes for lifelong
learning
Before and after school
programs
Nature and
environmental programs
Aquatic programs
Adult sports/fitness
Youth sports/fitness
Special events (i.e. Earth
Day, 4th of July, festivals,
etc.)
24
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Youth & Teen Empowerment
Special attention is needed
to engage and empower
Cupertino youth and teens.
With the high academic
pressure placed on teenagers in Cupertino,
residents would like to see spaces and
programming for teenagers that focus on
empowerment, stress reduction, confidence-
building, well-being and fun. Outreach
participants favor providing volunteer and
internship opportunities, enhancing non-
competitive youth sports and fitness, and
other diverse youth offerings. Community
leaders recommend increasing youth and teen
involvement in community activities and events.
Relocating and reprograming the teen center
would help better support teens and balance
the need for educational, recreational and
social opportunities. Opportunities include a
student union-style space and elements noted
by Cupertino’s teens in the 2016 Teen Center
Relocation Survey. While ideas to serve teens
varied, many outreach respondents agreed
that teens warranted special attention and
programming tailored to their specific needs.
FIGURE 11: PREFERRED OPTIONS TO INCORPORATE TEEN EMPOWERMENT IN
CUPERTINO PARKS AND RECREATION (VISION AND GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE)
25
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
Welcoming Places & Services
Residents expect
outstanding customer
service and quality facilities
that are responsive to
community needs.
Outreach findings indicate high community
expectations for a more user-friendly, customer-
oriented parks and recreation system. “Safe,”
“friendly,” and “welcoming” are the top
priorities for Cupertino’s parks and recreation
system. While most residents are highly satisfied
with the safety and maintenance of Cupertino’s
parks, several believe that better parks are
offered outside of Cupertino, citing concerns
with the quality of certain amenities and features
in local parks.
Enhancing park amenities such as benches, shade
structures, seating variety, water fountains and
bike racks can help make parks more comfortable
and welcoming. Community members would
like to see recreation programming that is timed
for their lives and better suited to their interests.
Residents also requested improvements to the
reservation process, such as increased flexibility.
They also mentioned opportunities to improve
the City’s website, with a simple portal for
residents to make suggestions.
59% of Questionnaire respondents want more benches, shade structures, water fountains, bike racks and amenities to make parks more comfortable
FIGURE 12: HIGH SATISFACTION IN THE QUALITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SERVICES (CITYWIDE SURVEY)
25%
3%
55%
15%
3%
26
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Uniquely Cupertino
Parks and recreation
opportunities should reflect
Cupertino’s character,
heritage and diverse
community.
Cupertino is a unique
community and residents want parks that
emphasize the community’s character
and heritage. Many residents recommend
integrating local history, art, culture and
natural resources into parks and facilities to
help provide recreation opportunities that
reflect Cupertino’s unique character. Programs,
preschool options and teen services should
respond to the community’s interest in
educational opportunities and lifelong learning.
Community groups, agencies, businesses and
providers should collaborate to provide unique
and specialized programs. The City is gauging
resident and business support for integrating
technology and innovation into events,
programs and recreation spaces to incubate
new and exciting opportunities for Cupertino
residents. As one Council member noted, the
City needs to ask, “What is best for Cupertino?”
and incorporate those answers into the parks,
programs and services provided.
Questionnaire respondents favor integrating local history, art, culture and natural resources in parks and facilities as a top method to reflect Cupertino’s unique character
FIGURE 13: PREFERRED OPTIONS TO ENHANCE PARKS AND RECREATION
FACILITIES TO REFLECT CUPERTINO’S UNIQUE CHARACTER AND IDENTITY (VISION
AND GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE)
27
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
The Arts
Cupertino should support
the arts by offering a
diverse set of arts and
culture programming.
Community members strongly support
expanding arts and culture programs and
events in Cupertino. Residents would like to
see more art programs and festivals, and are
in favor of investing in dedicated facilities
that would support high-quality and diverse
activities, including visual, performing and fine
arts programming. Residents also highlighted
the need to provide arts programming for
people of all ages and abilities, with a focus on
activities for youth and teens. Increasing arts
programming can offer diverse opportunities for
teen empowerment.
Residents raised the possibility of building a
performing and fine arts venue dedicated to
the arts. Residents value variety in terms of arts
programming, recommending diverse events,
such as poetry readings, a jazz festival, concerts,
arts and crafts fair. Council members and
community leaders also noted opportunities to
improve Memorial Park to better host events and
amphitheater programs.
An arts center, such as the Mountain
View Center for the Performing arts, is
desired. (Council and Community Leader
Interviews; Community Workshop)
28
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Partnerships
Strong partnerships
can help create unique
and diverse parks and
recreation programs.
The engagement process revealed that Cupertino
residents have high expectations for parks and
recreation opportunities, including needs that
may not be met by the City alone. To provide the
diverse opportunities desired, many outreach
respondents recommended involving partners
to increase space and funding for recreation.
Residents noted opportunities for community
groups, agencies, businesses and providers
to collaborate in the provision of unique and
specialized programs. Many participants
suggested creating café-style spaces for youth
and teens, that could possibly be developed
in conjunction with the Cupertino Library or
schools, and organized around educational
programming themes (e.g., incubator space,
music/performing arts, entrepreneurship).
Opportunities for local businesses to sponsor
parks and recreation were also noted. Building
partnerships can also help expand volunteer
opportunities for all ages.
FIGURE 14: PREFERRED PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES IN CUPERTINO PARKS AND
RECREATION (VISION AND GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE)
29
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
Cultural Diversity
Recreation facilities and
programs should celebrate
Cupertino’s cultural
diversity.
Residents want parks that reflect the cultural
diversity of residents, thereby celebrating
Cupertino’s unique character, heritage, and
community. Council members have noted that
culturally diverse and culturally enriching
programs and facilities are needed, such as
cultural events and celebrations, tai chi, cricket,
performing and cultural arts. Many residents
recommend organizing more multicultural
festivals and events in Cupertino to celebrate the
City’s cultural diversity.
Providing new and different recreation
options for culturally diverse residents
will help respond to changing markets and
demographics. Residents would like to see both
busy “activated” parks for active recreation
and quieter parks for passive recreation.
Additionally, stakeholders frequently mentioned
that it was important to provide inclusive play
opportunities that are accessible for people of all
age groups and for people with disabilities.
A majority of Questionnaire respondents want recreation facilities that support diverse cultural interests
FIGURE 15: PREFERRED OPTIONS TO ADDRESS CUPERTINO’S CULTURAL
DIVERSITY THROUGH PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES (VISION AND GOALS
QUESTIONNAIRE)
30
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
We aspire to create an
inspiring, lively, healthy,
diverse and sustainable
community by connecting our
residents to outstanding parks,
nature and one another.
Cupertino:
•PROMOTES parks and public
spaces as integral elements
of our City’s character;
•RESTORES, preserves,
and protects our creeks,
meadows, trees and
natural areas;
•ENGAGES our diverse
residents in healthy,
inclusive events and
activities; and
•CREATES a safe, connected,
walkable and welcoming
community.
Master Plan Vision Master Plan Mission
31
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
master plan vision
Throughout the Master Plan process, an
estimated 2,000 community members shared
their aspirations for Cupertino’s parks, open
space, and recreation programs. From this input,
a vision statement was crafted to guide the City
as it works to enhance recreation opportunities
for all Cupertino residents. The vision statement
paints a picture of the desired future the
community wants to achieve.
We aspire to create an inspiring, lively, healthy,
diverse and sustainable community by
connecting our residents to outstanding parks,
nature and one another.
This vision includes the following elements:
Create: to bring about through our collective
ingenuity, creativity, innovation, activity and
interest in exploring new ideas and places
Inspiring: cultivating a high level of community
satisfaction and inspired living
Lively: activating and invigorating our
community through programs, events and
diverse recreation opportunities that provide
experiences for all ages, interests and abilities
Healthy: improving our community’s health,
fitness and wellness, along with the City’s
financial health and economic vitality
Diverse: the unique character and culture of
Cupertino
Sustainable: supporting our future legacy by
maintaining a green, environmentally-friendly
system
Community: the unique place, people and
shared fellowship that grows from our common
attitudes, interests, goals, and aspirations for the
future
Connecting: creating relationships, linking and
uniting people through trails, social activities,
volunteerism, community engagement and
partnerships, and stewardship
Our residents: the people and families who live
in Cupertino, as well as employees who spend
their daytime hours here
Outstanding: our desire to be the best; to be a
world-class, accredited, Gold Medal department
Parks: our safe, well-maintained open spaces
and social hubs that support inclusive, indoor
and outdoor recreation facilities, plus a variety of
events, programs and recreation experiences
Nature: our wildlife, trees, creeks, meadows
and natural areas that that support a healthy
ecosystem, recreation, environmental education,
stewardship, stress reduction and community
health
One another: the people who live, work, visit
and attend school in Cupertino
master plan mission
A mission statement, presented on the previous
page, describes the approach that City staff will
take in providing parks, recreation facilities and
programs, trails and open space. The mission
statement emerged from public priorities
and was refined by staff and advisory group
members before presentation to the Parks and
Recreation Commission and City Council.
32
VISION & GOALS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
master plan goals
Master Plan goals will provide overarching
guidance for the parks and recreation system.
These goals are aligned with the City’s General
Plan goals and policies for Parks and Recreation.
Seven goals are presented:
•MP1. CONSERVATION
Protect nature, trees and natural areas in
parks and throughout the city to support
wildlife, ecological functions and a
stronger connection to Cupertino’s natural
environment.
•MP2. CONNECTION
Provide an interconnected network of
multiuse trails, walkways and bikeways,
close-to-home parks, and community
destinations.
•MP3. EQUITABLE ACCESS
Distribute parks and facilities throughout the
community for easy and equitable access.
•MP4. ENHANCEMENT
Reinvigorate and revitalize parks and
recreation facilities to support broad and
inclusive recreation interests.
•MP5. ACTIVITY
Provide programs, events and services that
foster social cohesiveness and lively, diverse
activities for people of all ages, abilities,
cultures, and interests.
•MP6. QUALITY
Create high quality recreation experiences,
places and services that are welcoming, safe,
responsive, comfortable and reflective of
Cupertino’s unique character.
•MP7. SUSTAINABILITY
Provide, manage and maintain parks,
facilities, programs and services through
sound management and stewardship,
sustainable choices and the wise use of
resources.
These goals reflect community priorities and
guide the objectives and actions in the next
chapter.
MP1: CONSERVATION
MP2: CONNECTION
MP3: EQUITABLE ACCESS
MP4: ENHANCEMENT
MP5: ACTIVITY
MP6: QUALITY
MP7: SUSTAINABILITY
33
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER TWO
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS
3
37
#.X Objective: Objectives reflect the desired outcomes the City wants to achieve by implementing the Master Plan.
Goal MP#: Master Plan goals provide direction for long-range change.
i Action: Actions are the more detailed ideas, innovations and strategies that will help achieve Master Plan goals.
systemwide objectives
and actions
Objectives and strategic actions are presented
below, organized and numbered by goal. To
support decision-making, these actions should
continue to be evaluated and integrated into the
City’s annual planning for projects and services,
annual work plans, and departmental strategic
plans that will follow this Master Plan.
Goals, objectives and actions are noted in the
following format:
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS
3
38
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 1: CONSERVATION
MP1 Protect nature, trees and natural areas in parks and throughout the city to support wildlife, ecological functions and a stronger connection to Cupertino’s natural environment.
1.A Protect important natural resources, habitat, and riparian corridors through
acquisition and collaboration.
i Protect important natural resources through park land acquisition,
conservation easements, regulations and other techniques.
ii Work with partners, including but not limited to Santa Clara County,
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, Santa Clara Valley Water
District, Union Pacific Railroad, nonprofits, and private entities/property
owners to strategically connect riparian corridors, wetlands and other
natural areas to preserve vital ecological functions, protect habitat,
improve water quality and increase biodiversity.
iii Connect habitat within the Stevens Creek corridor from north to south
Cupertino, taking interim steps and making progress towards protection
and preservation of this key riparian corridor.
iv Evaluate and pursue opportunities to protect parcels along creeks, or
contiguous to existing parks and natural areas, or with active or remnant
habitat.
v Collaborate with efforts to enhance or expand habitat areas and conduct
restoration in County parks, open space preserves, creek corridors and
other natural areas.
vi Support efforts to secure public ownership and protect and restore habitat
on undeveloped tracts, such as the former McDonald Dorsa quarry site,
or lands in the vicinity of the cement plant, if such opportunities become
available.
39
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
1.B Manage meadows, natural areas, wildlife habitat and creeks within City
jurisdiction to maintain and restore ecological health and function.
i Implement or support work by others to remove invasive species, address
bank erosion, enhance habitat value, and improve water quality and flood
capacity to enhance the ecological function along Regnart, Calabazas,
Heney, Stevens, Permanente and Saratoga Creeks, Junipero Serra Channel,
and open space parcels. (Most such sites are not City-owned.)
ii Foster natural systems by creating pollinator pathways through the city,
taking advantage of rights-of-way to create a gridded network of habitat
within the urban core of Cupertino.
40
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
iii Add bird-friendly and pollinator-friendly plantings, gardens and features
in parks and at other City-owned sites. Include bird baths/water sources,
rocks with shallow depressions, bird houses and nest-friendly areas,
bee nesting blocks, vegetation for forage and cover, and protected, non-
mulched ground areas for ground-nesting species where appropriate.
iv Create or enhance “park forests,” concentrated tree plantings that establish
a large, contiguous tree canopy and emphasize native trees. Augment the
existing tree canopies at Jollyman, Three Oaks and Linda Vista parks.
v Support efforts to secure public ownership and restore habitat on
undeveloped tracts, such as former quarry property or lands in the
vicinity of the cement plant, if such opportunities become available.
vi Support efforts in Santa Clara County to protect and expand oak savannas
and woodlands.
vii Within the Stevens Creek corridor, renovate the Blackberry Farm Golf
Course to provide improved habitat value. Future decisions regarding the
golf course property should respect the site’s unique creekside location
and emphasize choices that are compatible with increased ecological
value.
MP1: CONSERVATION, CONTINUED
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
41
1.C Ensure natural resources in parks and on City property are maintained and
stewarded.
i Continue to work with volunteers and partners to improve, enhance and
restore natural areas.
ii Maintain natural areas in parks to control invasive species, remove or
prune hazardous trees, control river- and stream-bank erosion, minimize
wildfire hazards and provide safe access.
iii Develop a maintenance management plan that addresses natural resources
in park lands and trail corridors and regularly update it. This plan will
identify the maintenance tasks, frequencies, staffing and resources needed
to manage, maintain and steward natural resources.
iv Prepare guidelines for use of native vegetation and wildlife-friendly
elements for trails along creek corridors and parks in proximity to creeks.
These can address items such as use of native riparian plantings, bird- and
pollinator-friendly plantings, goals for addition of native oaks, and water
features/fountains for water for birds where creek flows are not year-
round.
42
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
1.D Design parks and trail corridors to reflect and respect the Santa Clara Valley
local ecology, habitats and native landscape.
i Incorporate and enhance existing natural features when renovating parks
or building new ones.
ii Preserve existing native or large canopy trees in parks.
iii Increase tree canopy where opportunities exist. Develop a Parks Tree
Palette for adding/replacing trees, and a plan for canopy succession.
iv Update the City’s Plant Palette to encourage horticultural diversity in
parks for both ecological benefits and visual interest. Include a variety of
carefully selected shrub, grass, and ground cover species that have unique
textures and colors and are best suited for Cupertino’s climate, soil, and
wildlife. Utilize native and/or climate-appropriate plants when possible;
consider drought tolerance; avoid invasive species.
v Embrace storm water management, incorporating green infrastructure
elements such as rain gardens, bioswales, permeable pavers and detention
ponds to help reduce flooding, filter pollutants and replenish groundwater
during storm events.
MP1: CONSERVATION, CONTINUED
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
43
vi Replace unused or under-used areas of lawn in City parks with pollinator
gardens, native plant species, trees that provide canopy or wildlife value,
and other planting regimes with habitat value.
vii Incorporate dark sky policies, which the City plans to develop in 2019-20,
into park and facility design and operations. Minimize light intrusion into
environmentally sensitive areas, and minimize/avoid lighting of creek
corridors or riparian habitats. Consider methods such as light intensities
as low as feasible, appropriate LED lighting color range, use of low
shielded downlighting, and turning off lights at night.
viii Incorporate bird-safe design guidelines, which the City plans to develop
in 2019-20, into park and facility design and operations. Consider
methods such as use of opaque/fritted/etched glass, avoiding multi-story
reflective/transparent glass, avoiding exterior uplighting and spotlights,
use of shielded exterior lights, and turning off building lights or use of
window blinds at night.
1.E Expand opportunities to experience nature, balancing access with natural
resource protection.
i Locate access points away from high value habitat and significant natural
resources to the extent feasible.
ii Interpret the natural environment and ecological processes in parks.
iii Add nature play elements in several locations.
44
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP1: CONSERVATION, CONTINUED
iv Encourage interaction with nature through the provision of nature trails,
habitat viewing areas, and pollinator plantings.
v Gather information and develop actions to manage existing orchards and
retain the connection with Cupertino’s agricultural past.
vi Incorporate community gardens at multiple park sites to provide hands-
on opportunities to interact with nature by growing and harvesting food.
vii Add plantings in developed parks to attract birds and butterflies for
viewing; incorporate boulder groupings, logs/woody debris, and other
niches and micro-habitats where insect and plant discovery can occur.
viii Provide quiet areas with seating that allow for solitude, in locations with
views of creeks, natural areas, or vistas across the landscape.
ix Support trails in creek corridors and natural areas, in a manner that
accommodates wildlife protection.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
45
1.F Support environmental education and nature interpretation.
i Continue the management and stewardship of the Stevens Creek corridor
as Cupertino’s environmental education and nature interpretation hub.
ii Collaborate with schools located near parks, e.g., Creekside, Portal and
Varian parks, to create outdoor “classroom” space.
iii Create “naturehood parks” by providing more natural elements and
learning areas (such as outdoor “classrooms,” gardens and places to dig),
in large neighborhood parks.
iv Provide environmental education and nature interpretation programming
at multiple sites, bringing the expertise of the McClellan Ranch Preserve
Environmental Education Center out into Cupertino’s neighborhoods and
developed parks.
v Continue to support and enhance the elementary school Creek Studies
Program that is currently hosted at McClellan Ranch Preserve and any
successor or associated programs.
vi Pursue collaboration with Deer Hollow Farm at Rancho San Antonio to
provide environmental education opportunities for the community.
46
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 2: CONNECTION
MP2 Provide an interconnected network of multi-use trails, walkways and bikeways, close-to-home parks, and community destinations.
2.A Implement opportunities for the proposed trails and paths noted in the
Bicycle Transportation Plan, Pedestrian Transportation Plan, Cupertino
General Plan, Countywide Trails Master Plan, and other local and
regional plans to improve access to parks and expand walking and biking
opportunities in Cupertino.
i Improve pedestrian and bike access to parks through the construction of
the envisioned network of Class I Bike Paths, Class II Bike Lanes, Class III
Bike Routes and Bike Boulevards, Class IV Protected Bikeways, as well as
the sidewalks, trails and pathways noted in the plans.
ii Dedicate or acquire open space along creeks and utility corridors for trails
through regional cooperation, grants and private development review.
iii Require dedication or easements for trails, as well as their development, as
part of the development review process, where appropriate.
iv Establish Joint Use Agreements with the Santa Clara Valley Water District
that support the implementation of trails along creeks and ponds.
v Implement way-finding signage to support use of trails, walkways and
bikeways.
vi Establish safe routes and access paths to park spaces.
vii Continue to evaluate and pursue opportunities to develop multi-use trails
walkways and bikeways.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
47
2.B Prioritize the completion of a comprehensive network of off-street walkways,
trails and protected bikeways to provide safe, inviting walking and biking
opportunities.
i Reassess the trail priorities in earlier planning efforts for the Bike and
Pedestrian transportation plans to focus on prioritizing improving access
to parks, recreational activities and programs, as well as connecting
parks to other community destinations. Revise criteria in the Bike and
Pedestrian plans to more highly rank routes that improve pedestrian and
cyclist access to such destinations.
ii Prioritize trail development and partnerships with surrounding cities and
agencies to connect Cupertino to regional trails.
iii Extend existing trails and fill gaps in connectivity to link City and County
parks and regional open space preserves and provide access to pedestrians
and bicyclists to trails in regional open space areas. (See Appendix D).
iv Connect the existing popular multi-use paths (Don Burnett Bicycle
Pedestrian Bridge and Homestead Road to Mary Avenue Trail, Stevens
Creek Trail and Saratoga Creek Trail) to more locations when possible,
such as extending the Mary Avenue Trail southward toward Stevens Creek
Blvd. and De Anza College, extending Stevens Creek Trail south to Linda
Vista Park or Stevens Creek County Park, extending Saratoga Creek Trail
northward to Stevens Creek Boulevard, or connecting the east end of
Junipero Serra Channel trail to the Saratoga Creek Trail.
v Pursue trails, walkways and bikeways that connect to current trails or
major destinations, such as a trail overpass over the railroad that would
link Rancho San Antonio to the west end of Stevens Creek Blvd.
48
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP2: CONNECTION, CONTINUED
vi When development proposals come forward, provide inviting pedestrian-
cyclist connections to current or envisioned trails.
–When redeveloping The Oaks shopping center, provide safe and
well-designed connections to a trail extension on the west side of
Mary Avenue that will link along or through the site to Stevens Creek
Boulevard and planned bikeway improvements and to a possible trail
extension to the Don Burnett Bicycle Pedestrian Bridge.
–For properties developing along the Junipero Serra Trail or Historic
De Anza Trail alignments, provide public trail access routes if feasible,
especially on commercial, industrial, office or mixed-use parcels.
vii Provide more trails in creek corridors (in a wildlife-compatible manner),
rail corridors and off-street locations to support park connectivity, non-
motorized transportation, recreation and health benefits.
viii Evaluate and pursue means to improve pedestrian/bicycle connectivity
and access to parks via use of rights-of-way, easements, joint use
agreements or partnerships, land acquisition from willing owners, or other
possible opportunities.
2.C Support walking in parks.
i Provide looped internal pathways or trails in parks with adequate space,
wide enough for people to walk side-by-side comfortably.
ii Provide benches, water fountains, distance markers, and other amenities
along pathways and trails to encourage walking for fitness. Add fitness
stations along suitable trails and walking routes in parks.
iii Vary trail length, types and challenge levels to expand trail-related recreation
options. Include soft-surfaced nature trails and jogging trails, as well as hard-
surfaced trails for bicycle, tricycle, walker, and stroller use.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
49
MP2: CONNECTION, CONTINUED
2.D Encourage biking and walking to parks and recreation destinations and use
of non-single-driver-vehicle options through physical and programmatic
enhancements.
i Create welcoming pedestrian and cyclist entrances to parks, with
pedestrian and bike paths that are visually prominent, direct, and
physically separated from parking lots.
ii Provide secure bike parking at parks, with racks located near each use
area. Add self-service bike repair stations at community parks, on trails
and at popular cycling destinations.
iii Publish bike and walking route information online and in the City’s public
materials such as the recreation program guide.
iv Provide recreation events that encourage use of the pedestrian-bike
network.
v Encourage drop-in group walks at several park sites around Cupertino
and publish a schedule of these.
vi Improve connections and paths between parks and surrounding uses,
such as schools and nearby neighborhoods.
vii Embrace the best practices of the National Recreation & Park Association’s
“Safe Routes to Parks” program.
viii Explore providing improved drop-off areas, very short-term parking,
convenient car pool parking space, and other improvements to encourage
carpools and shuttles and reduce demand for inefficient single-occupancy
vehicle parking.
ix Participate in the process to develop a city shuttle bus service pilot
program, and identify key park and recreation needs and destinations.
50
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 3: EQUITABLE ACCESS
MP3 Distribute parks and facilities throughout the community for easyand equitable access.
3.A Provide parks within walking distance of most residential areas.
i Strive to provide parks within a ½ mile (10-minute) walk of residents in
neighborhoods zoned for the following: Single Family Residential (R1),
Single Family Residential Cluster (R1C), and Residential Duplex (R2),
Multiple Family Residential (R3) and Mixed Use Planned Development
(P). (See Appendix D.)
ii For new “neighborhood parks” that are intended to provide
“neighborhood facilities,” strive for parks that are:
–City-owned or designated for public access;
–Open year-round and accessible during regular park hours;
–Located in the City;
–Not designed to provide County-wide or regional service; and
–Aim to provide a minimum of three unrestricted, self-directed
recreation uses. These uses do not require a permit, reservation,
membership, staff presence or advance scheduling to participate,
such as seating, playgrounds, looped walking paths, drop-in tennis
courts, drop-in basketball courts, picnic areas, turf areas for play, and
similar amenities that can be freely enjoyed and serve casual daily
neighborhood use.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
51
iii Consider areas where residents have access to less than 3 acres of park
land in the city within a 10-minute walk as “underserved.”
iv New developments in areas that are underserved should be required
v Supplement neighborhood parks with parks that provide specialized
facilities to meet unique recreation needs, such as dog parks, urban plazas,
trail corridors, joint use sports fields, community/recreation buildings, or
other special features.
3.B Continue to implement the park land acquisition and implementation
program to meet community recreation needs.
i Provide a minimum of three acres per 1,000 residents, as per General Plan
policies.
ii Apply acquisition strategies that balance land costs, availability and
recreation needs and strive to maintain the City’s existing level of
service of 3.7 acres of total park land and open space per 1,000 residents
(including City-managed sites with joint use agreements) as the
community grows through the year 2040.
iii Evaluate the City’s park land dedication criteria to determine if they best
serve the City. Revise and update the criteria and associated municipal
code as needed.
to dedicate park land rather than paying in-lieu fees, to the extent
allowed by State law.
52
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP3: EQUITABLE ACCESS, CONTINUED
iv Prioritize neighborhood park land acquisition in underserved areas in
Cupertino; consider how well each site meets the criteria noted above
for “neighborhood parks” that provide “neighborhood facilities” in
evaluating potential acquisitions.
v Provide new neighborhood parks of sufficient size to provide
opportunities for social gathering, play and active recreation.
vi Seek opportunities to expand existing parks through acquisition of
adjacent property from willing sellers, especially in underserved areas.
vii Explore acquisition of surplus school properties for park land. Take
advantage of the Naylor Act to purchase surplus school sites.
viii Pursue acquisition of available public agency properties for park land.
Pursue acquisition of the ‘Lawrence-Mitty’ property along Saratoga Creek.
ix Undertake a park procurement plan that includes actionable methods for
adding park and recreation space, and that addresses underserved areas.
x Pursue partnerships with School Districts to add, enhance or improve
public access to recreation facilities at school sites and to develop vacant
school-owned property, especially in underserved areas.
xi Explore expanding Joint Use Agreements with schools, especially in
underserved areas, to include public access to play areas, sports courts,
sports fields and other indoor and outdoor recreation amenities.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
53
xii Acquire land through easement, joint use agreement or ownership for trail
and riparian corridors.
xiii Pursue unique options, opportunities and partnerships to meet residential
and specialized park needs. These include, but are not limited to, privately
owned public open space (POPOS), park partnerships outside of the city
(e.g., Santa Clara County or adjacent cities), renovated or repurposed
buildings, jointly developed / joint use facilities, pocket parks, pavement-
to-park “parklets,” street or public plazas, and use of street and roadway
rights-of-way for permanent or temporary park space.
xiv Coordinate with new developments or redevelopments on park land
dedications or the provision of in-lieu fees. If in-lieu fees are provided,
regularly evaluate the fees and ensure these are sufficient to cover the cost
to acquire park land when it becomes available.
3.C Expand recreation opportunities by enhancing park and facility access.
i Implement programmatic solutions to enhance recreation options
throughout the city. These may include, but are not limited to, mobile or
pop-up programs (staff-led activities) and movable facilities (e.g., climbing
wall, dance floor, movie screen that can be set up in different locations.)
54
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP3: EQUITABLE ACCESS, CONTINUED
ii Explore options to increase access to existing non City-owned community
facilities, such as gymnasiums, swimming pools, tennis courts and
theaters/performance space provided by the School Districts, De Anza
College and non-profit organizations in Cupertino. Assess opportunities
to increase public use through options such as scheduling changes,
programming provision, and/or reductions in fees or subsidies.
iii Improve entryways to parks and recreation facilities to make them
more attractive, accessible, and welcoming. Ensure parks and recreation
facilities are as welcoming to visitors traveling by foot and bicycle as they
are to those arriving by automobile.
iv Consider programmatic and physical improvements to improve access
by motorized and public transportation. Improve drop-off areas and
loading/unloading zones; address parking needs while considering
autonomous vehicle trends; facilitate or connect residents to shuttle
services, transit and transportation options.
v Provide recreation facilities that are usable year-round and in all seasons.
Update agreements, documents or practices that limit recreation use of
City facilities to expand usage windows.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
55
vi Explore methods to deliver more use from existing facilities. (For example,
consider adding programming at buildings that are currently closed
evenings or weekends, revising field use permits to an hourly or usage
basis rather than ‘blanket’ permits to encourage more efficient usage, or
other ideas.)
vii Embrace and strive for universal designed access to parks and facilities
for all people, regardless of ability. Strive for universal/ all-inclusive
design to make existing and new parks and facilities more user friendly
and accessible to populations with special needs, parents with young
children and others who benefit from wider access routes, seating and
resting points, shade, universal and family-friendly restrooms, and similar
accommodations.
56
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 4: ENHANCEMENT
MP4 Reinvigorate and revitalize parks and recreation facilities and diversify offerings to support broad and inclusive recreation interests.
4.A Embark on a program of strategic reinvestment in and renovation/expansion
of major facilities to meet community priorities.
i When major reinvestment is needed in existing recreation facilities,
evaluate the benefit before doing a like-for-like replacement. Consider
repurposing, or a more significant remodel to retool the current inventory
of facilities and better meet community needs.
ii Improve the user experience when renovating existing indoor facilities.
Include welcoming entry sequences, social/lobby/lounge spaces,
convenient pick-up and drop-off, and comfortable areas to wait for
transportation.
iii Consider the new facility needs (see 4B) when evaluating reinvestments
and enhancements to Quinlan Community Center and Cupertino Sports
Center, two large facilities which could be remodeled or expanded to
address broader recreation interests and needs.
iv When building or remodeling, strive for flexible, multi-use space that can
accommodate a range of uses and that can be adapted over time to serve
evolving needs.
v Incorporate findings of Public Works’ 2019 Facility Condition and Use
Assessment into recreation facility planning and capital project proposals.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
57
vi Consider whether a smaller facility should be phased out or repurposed
once its uses can be incorporated into a facility that better accommodates
its program. (For example, Monte Vista Recreation Center and the Wilson
Park ceramics studio are aging facilities that house important programs
but are not designed for their current uses.)
4.B Consider adding new major facilities to meet community needs at existing
parks, through renovations to existing facilities, or at sites acquired in the
future.
i Prepare a business plan prior to developing new major facilities
to help identify the optimal size, amenities, location, programming, fees,
revenue and operating model for facilities with high operating costs, such
as a performing arts center, an aquatic facility or a gymnasium/recreation
center. Evaluate grouping similar uses (e.g., maker space, art studio space,
performing arts) for synergies and operating efficiencies.
ii Evaluate options for joint-use partnerships and/or renovation of existing
facilities (public, private or partner) prior to building new ones.
iii Explore potential equity partners, operating partners and sponsors before
planning and designing major facilities.
58
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP4: ENHANCEMENT, CONTINUED
iv Consider adding the following facilities in the future, if warranted and
desired:
–Performing Arts/Fine Arts Center
–Gymnasium/Recreation Center
–Year-round Aquatics (see 4C below)
–Expanded Senior Center or satellite site with senior-friendly
services
–Improved/Relocated Teen Center
–Technology Center/Incubator Hub/Maker Space
4.C Expand swimming and water play opportunities.
i Continue to operate the Blackberry Farm pool complex as a place for
leisure and swimming. If feasible in the future, pursue expanding the
swimming season.
ii Pursue partnerships with other entities that have swimming pools in and
near Cupertino, especially focused on securing time for family swimming,
swim lessons, lap swimming, and aquatic exercise.
iii Evaluate providing a new year-round aquatics complex in the city based
on a business and operations plan that recommends a design program.
Consider a full range of aquatics programming to provide the most
opportunity for users and increase revenue potential. Provide programs
and facilities that focus on varied recreation opportunities for families and
for all ages and abilities.
iv Provide more water play features (splash pads/spray play areas/
interactive water features) for play in warm weather, geographically
dispersed in the city.
4.D Diversify play experiences to support extraordinary play.
i Encourage play for all age groups, including children, teens, adults and seniors.
ii Provide a universally-accessible, all-inclusive destination play area in an
easily accessible location such as a large neighborhood park.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
59
iii Provide inclusive elements in new play areas and in existing ones when
renovating or updating them, and to all play areas over time.
iv Consider users of all ages, backgrounds, needs and abilities when
developing recreation programming.
v Pilot an adventure playground or nature play area to stimulate the
imagination by including sand and water play, or interactive elements with
movable and loose parts.
vi Provide unique destination play areas in community parks.
vii Provide temporary mobile recreation programs and amenities in different
locations around the city.
viii Add “unstructured” and varied play opportunities that look beyond
modular, traditional manufactured play structures.
4.E Improve the functionality and usability of existing facilities for field sports.
i Design multi-use sports fields to support multiple sports: rectangular fields
should be designed to allow for soccer, lacrosse, Ultimate Frisbee, etc.
ii Provide at least one cricket/multi-use field.
iii Make investments in softball and baseball fields to get more playing time
and more use out of these facilities, such as allowing for continued or
expanded youth soccer in outfield areas during non-ball game times or
designing to accommodate kickball or different base distances.
iv Partner with school districts on expanding community use of school
sports fields.
60
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP4: ENHANCEMENT, CONTINUED
v Consider whether to create an artificial turf field, which could allow
sooner use after wet weather than natural turf.
vi Evaluate whether lighting any sport fields is appropriate to extend
evening usage hours.
vii Manage sport fields to maximize and optimize use. (For example, evaluate
the field use permitting system and consider new practices to improve
field use efficiency.)
4.F Add new features and facilities at existing parks to create variety and
respond to diverse recreation interests.
i Provide at least one special feature or facility at each large neighborhood
park, so that each park offers something unique in addition to the
traditional park features of playgrounds, sports fields, and picnic tables.
ii Consider incorporating additional features suggested by the community
during the Master Plan process when renovating existing or building new
parks. (See also Chapter 4.)
–Covered/shaded picnic areas for smaller groups (5-25)
–More outdoor event space
–Outdoor games, such as chess tables, giant checkers, Jenga®, or
outdoor table tennis
–More courts and types of courts (bocce, pickleball, badminton,
volleyball, futsal) which address the community’s diversity
–Outdoor “living rooms,” “libraries” and seating areas
–Outdoor fitness equipment
–Bike skills area or pump track
–Roller hockey
–Disc golf course (full or mini course)
–Community gardens
–Healing garden
–Teaching/educational garden
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
61
MP4: ENHANCEMENT, CONTINUED
iii Prioritize the addition of basketball courts, especially full-size courts, to
provide multiple basketball venues.
iv Provide additional dog parks and explore providing off-leash dog areas
and/or dog exercise spaces where suitable.
v Develop a process for collecting and evaluating future community
proposals for new features in parks, including identifying whether there
are partner resources for implementation.
4.G Provide social hubs, group gathering spaces and activity areas to support
social interaction, self-directed group activities and drop-in users.
i Add a variety of seating options and groupings of seating in parks:
benches, movable seating, seat walls, etc.
ii Create activity hubs by locating seating areas, shade, and other elements
that encourage people to linger near places that attract daily activity
(playgrounds, dog parks, etc.)
iii Provide shaded, reservable and “first-come, first-served” medium and
large group picnic areas at multiple sites across Cupertino.
iv Incorporate accessible outdoor fitness hubs in parks, locating these near
activity areas.
v Provide restrooms in higher use parks.
vi Provide Wi-Fi and shaded/covered outdoor working areas with charging
stations in selected parks to encourage students and employees to be
outdoors.
vii Provide equipment and technology in parks to support recreation
activities, especially fitness.
62
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 5: ACTIVITY
MP5 Support social gatherings, events, programs and activities for people of all ages, abilities, cultures, and interests.
5.A Facilitate and provide events, fairs, and festivals that foster community
cohesiveness.
i Continue to facilitate and refresh community-wide events, fairs and
festivals at Memorial Park, as well as other suitable community spaces.
ii Improve facilities and infrastructure at Memorial Park to better
accommodate festivals.
iii Provide smaller events in neighborhood parks, such as movies in the park,
concerts, arts and crafts, outdoor fitness, and recreation activities that
would appeal to nearby neighbors.
iv Support temporary unique events, such as “pop-up” parklets or
temporary street closures for special programs.
v Increase outdoor programs and events that support health, wellness and
fitness, such as races, walkathons, walking groups, boot camps, or 10,000
step challenges.
vi Explore opportunities to host events at new venues, including potential
partnerships, joint-use arrangements or special event policies such as exist
for Cali Mill Plaza and Main Street Park/Town Square.
vii Facilitate community groups as bodies for organizing neighborhood
events.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
63
5.B Rethink facilities, programs and services to empower Cupertino youth and
teens.
i Develop and program a new student union-style or café-style activity
center for teens, potentially in partnership with a school, library district
or other entity, or at a new or re-purposed venue. Be open to creative
methods or settings to achieve this.
ii Connect youth and teens to volunteer opportunities and internships.
iii Support teen opportunities for skill building, college application
assistance, employment training, trips and excursions.
iv Facilitate and coordinate more events such as <hack> Cupertino that
merge fun, social and educational opportunities.
v Consider adding fitness equipment or activities that are likely to appeal
to teens (e.g. “exer-gaming,” interactive equipment, and climbing wall).
Maintain relevancy by staying apprised of national trends.
vi Evaluate and pursue opportunities to offer stress reduction activities for teens
and offerings that support their well being. Diversify locations where teen
offerings occur and prioritize locations preferred by teens.
vii Add more challenging and adventurous recreation facilities, such as
climbing spires or bike skills parks and provide introductory “lessons”
and social activities to encourage use.
viii Provide appropriate evening and nighttime teen activities and social events.
ix Involve youth and teens in planning events and programs, and designing
park spaces.
64
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP5: ACTIVITY, CONTINUED
5.C Support lifelong learning and recreation for adults and seniors, responding
to the increasing population of these demographic groups.
i Provide multi-generational activities and services for older adults, both fit
and frail.
ii Expand programs, activities and services designed for seniors and older
adults at facilities and destinations outside the Senior Center.
iii Increase opportunities to get seniors outdoors—through programs such as
guided walks, gardening, lawn bowling, and disc golf.
iv Increase opportunities for senior fitness and senior sports, recognizing that
seniors are staying active longer.
v Increase programming that targets young/active seniors, including at the
Sports Center.
vi Add programming space and associated infrastructure to the Senior
Center when resources are available, to address the significant increase in
the 65+ senior population (140% increase in the Bay Area from 2010-2040).
vii Add senior-friendly athletic and fitness facilities, such as pickleball courts,
bocce courts, and senior-oriented outdoor fitness equipment.
viii Consider re-naming and re-branding the Senior Center and expanding its
hours and offerings to attract a wider range of older adults.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
65
MP5: ACTIVITY, CONTINUED
5.D Increase arts and cultural programming and emphasize collaboration with
partners.
i Increase the amount of arts and cultural programming available in
Cupertino, including programs, events and festivals associated with fine
arts, music, educational arts, literary arts and media arts.
ii Continue to offer cultural programming and events, working with
community cultural groups to tailor these to the diverse interests and
backgrounds of Cupertino’s residents.
iii Encourage smaller scale “mini-art” performances (e.g., street performer-
style programs, short/small performances, or temporary art installations)
in parks or under-utilized public spaces to bring more performing arts
viewing opportunities to residents.
iv Incorporate artists and art into youth recreation programming, partnering
with schools and other organizations.
v Consider partnership opportunities to provide maker space/incubator
hub programming merged with art interests to support programs and
classes such as computer animation, videography, graphics, website
development, music recording, etc.
vi Explore the availability of performing arts space at existing venues.
vii Collaborate with the Fine Arts Commission to support art programs, such
as “Art in Unexpected Places.”
5.E Support environmental education and nature interpretation programming.
i Continue to provide quality environmental education and nature
programming at McClellan Ranch Preserve, including both indoor and
outdoor programs.
ii Continue to increase the opportunities for gardening and food production
in Cupertino. Provide community garden space at other locations besides
McClellan Ranch Preserve.
iii Partner with schools to create outdoor classrooms and curricula to bring
environmental education options closer to students. Consider more
natural areas in parks adjacent to schools, such as Varian and Portal parks.
iv Provide more challenging nature-based activities in parks and recreation
facilities, such as orienteering, overnight camping, outdoor survival
training, canoe/kayak training (in pools or at reservoirs/lakes), etc.
66
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP5: ACTIVITY, CONTINUED
5.F Provide outdoor recreation programs in neighborhood parks.
i Support organized play opportunities, classes and activities in parks.
Consider programming options led by staff, contract staff and partners.
ii Provide a mix of fun and learning opportunities, including learning new
activities, skills, sports and information about local history, nature and
culture.
iii Offer outdoor exercise and programs to support health and wellness, such
as outdoor yoga, tai chi, badminton, volleyball, kickball, and boot camps,
and including some free or low-cost programming.
iv Explore options for mobile or pop-up programs (staff-led activities) and
movable facilities (e.g., climbing wall, portable movie screen) that can be
set up in large or small neighborhood parks and other locations where
appropriate.
v When renovating neighborhood parks, explore options to add
infrastructure, facilities or utilities to support neighborhood programming
and events. For example, add electrical service, include paved areas that
can be used as stage spaces, choose pavilions/tables that can be used as
outdoor “classrooms” as well as for picnic/party reservations.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
67
MP5: ACTIVITY, CONTINUED
5.G Prioritize core program services areas to more effectively manage and provide
programs, events and activities.
i Continue to provide and enhance services in the following program
services areas: Arts & Culture; Events and Festivals; Child, Youth and Teen
Development & Leadership; Education & Nature Interpretation; Lifelong
Learning & Enrichment; Seniors/Older Adult Programs; Aquatics; and
Sports, Fitness and Exercise.
ii Add and increase program options or partner/promote/support services
by others in the following program services areas: Culturally Diverse
Programming; Play and Outdoor Recreation; and Therapeutic Recreation
including for all abilities.
iii Provide or continue to provide the following supplemental services
to support community activities and ensure programming excellence:
Adaptive/Inclusive Recreation Accommodations; Community Outreach
and Neighborhood Services; Park and Facility Reservations, Rentals and
Permits; Sports Field Scheduling; Partnership and Volunteer Coordination.
68
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 6: QUALITY
MP6 Create high quality recreation experiences, places and services that are welcoming, safe, responsive, comfortable and reflective of Cupertino’s unique character.
6.A Design and develop high quality, high functioning parks and social spaces.
i Develop and implement design, development and programming
guidelines as well as maintenance standards to elevate the quality,
functionality and uniqueness of parks.
ii Balance maintenance needs and efficiencies with desires to provide
unique, artistic or themed amenities and facilities in parks. Involve
maintenance staff in decision-making about park design and elements to
include in parks.
iii Design multi-use spaces and facilities to be flexible and easily adaptable to
address changing community needs over time.
iv In site renovation and development, design parks and facilities to take into
account the supervisory needs of program staff, parents and guardians
to watch over children and those they caretake as they participate in
activities. Consider sight lines, the proximity of play areas and restrooms,
the location of benches, and distance of parking and drop-off areas to the
program space.
v In site renovation and development of parks and facilities, collaborate
with County Sheriff and County Fire staff to secure design input
relating to safety aspects. Take into account the needs and practices
of public safety personnel, including after-hours sheriff patrols and
emergency access needs. Utilize principles of “Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design.”
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
69
vi Provide support amenities such as lighting, trash receptacles, water
fountains, dog dishes, restrooms, loading/unloading zones and parking
to address site functional needs. For example, provide restrooms within
indoor facilities in neighborhood parks to better support staff-led program
activities for children. Ensure parking and drop-off areas and loading/
unloading zones support facility use, events and programs.
vii Apply a consistent template for informational, directional and site identity
signage in parks and trail corridors.
viii Provide improved natural lighting in buildings, acoustics and sound
attenuation, energy and resource efficiency with maintenance, upgrades,
and new construction projects.
6.B Incorporate Cupertino’s identity and placemaking into park and facility
design, renovation and revitalization.
i Involve nearby neighbors, stakeholders and interest groups in the
planning, design and development of parks, recreation facilities and trails.
ii Add elements to City parks and facilities that reflect Cupertino’s unique
environment, interests and community characteristics.
iii Integrate unique elements and vary designs to elevate Cupertino’s system
and enhance user experiences.
iv Promote and encourage art in public parks and open spaces. Develop
policy and criteria for art installations and potential art donations through
collaboration with the Fine Arts Commission.
70
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP6: QUALITY, CONTINUED
v Develop, implement and maintain a master signage plan for all Cupertino
public parks to ensure adequate and consistent signage that identifies
public parks and recreation areas.
vi Protect, preserve and restore historic buildings and sites and provide
interpretive signage about Cupertino’s local history to inform visitors and
spotlight Cupertino’s uniqueness.
vii Highlight natural features/topography and protect local landscapes to
emphasize Cupertino’s identity.
viii Provide interpretive elements in parks to educate the community about
the City’s cultural diversity and natural resources. Enhance existing
interpretive elements and features to tell a story about Cupertino and the
surrounding region.
ix Invest in high-quality materials, art, details, storytelling and other
methods to elevate design to create Cupertino-worthy facilities. Recent
examples high-quality facilities are Franco and Sterling Barnhart Parks,
the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge and the McClellan Ranch
Environmental Education Center.
x Design parks with site themes, special elements and different color and
material palettes so that each has a unique character.
xi Explore opportunities to integrate Cupertino’s sister city relationships into
park features, landscaping and programming.
xii Design and redevelop parks to provide the facilities, activities and
programs best suited for the service area based on the site’s history,
the desires/demographic characteristics of nearby neighbors, and the
surrounding neighborhood’s character, including current and future
development, land use and density.
xiii Consider new trends and needs, as well as the preferences of nearby
neighbors, before replacing amenities or facilities at the end of their
lifecycle. Avoid replacing failing amenities and facilities in-kind without
reviewing current needs.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
71
6.C Improve parks and recreation hospitality and comfort to enhance recreation
user experiences.
i Make parks more comfortable by providing or enhancing support
amenities such as benches, drinking fountains with bottle fillers and bike
racks/bike parking. Coordinate with proposed City plan to increase access
to drinking water at City facilities and parks, in support of Healthy Cities
Initiative goals.
ii Provide shaded areas in parks, trails and outdoor spaces, using shade
trees, shade “sails” or permanent shade structures.
iii Provide benches, tables, and places to relax in parks. Provide benches at
intervals along looped paths and trails.
iv Provide small social spaces, seating areas and activity hubs in parks.
v Add device charging stations/plugs in parks or facilities at higher-use
gathering areas where demand exists. Consider solar-powered options for
outdoor benches and tables.
vi Provide clean, inviting, accessible restrooms in large neighborhood
parks and community parks, and other high use or well programmed
sites. Include good ventilation and amenities such as mirrors and baby
changing stations. Pursue providing restroom access at sport fields.
vii Consider parking/paving layouts that accommodate mobile uses,
including food trucks where appropriate (consistent with Economic
Development Strategic Plan goals).
72
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP6: QUALITY, CONTINUED
6.D Enhance communication, the availability of parks and programming
information, and customer service.
i Refresh the Department’s identity to align with Master Plan vision,
mission and goals as part of a regular strategic planning process.
ii Regularly update the City’s website using the most current information
from the Department’s rebranded image.
iii Use the City’s website to collect contact information for people who would
like to be on mailing lists to receive updates about programs, events and
services.
iv Provide easy-to-find calendar schedules of City drop-in programs, events
and community meetings to facilitate participation.
v Provide information about available transportation assistance, connections
to social services, and other resources available to residents in the
community.
vi Continue to offer communication support in multiple languages to
diverse groups; in the long term, continue to monitor needs to provide
information, signage and materials in different languages.
vii Make it easier to register, reserve and use parks, facilities and programs
via online programs suitable for computer, tablet or phone use. Continue
implementation of software, network and connectivity improvements that
allow users to register for programs more conveniently and from more
locations. Implement procedures that are as simple and flexible as possible
for users to make or change reservations and registrations.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
73
viii Maintain the ability to report unsatisfactory park conditions or concerns
using the web or a smart phone app (such as the current Cupertino 311
app).
ix Encourage all staff who have customer contact (including maintenance,
administrative and recreation staff) to participate in customer service and
cultural diversity training. Trainings should address American customs
as well as the perspectives of other countries and cultures to strengthen
staff’s ability to deliver a positive, welcoming experience for all customers.
6.E Track, monitor and report data to measure performance in providing high
quality parks and services.
i Identify 8-10 Department performance measures to track annually that
will measure progress and communicate success in providing services
(e.g., participation, satisfaction, cost recovery, per capita investments).
ii Provide resources to collect and evaluate data on participation by service
area and other key metrics; provide in an annual report.
iii Identify and implement the processes needed to track and measure
services. Coordinate new registration system software with needed data-
tracking processes.
iv Continue conducting online customer feedback surveys to collect data on
customer satisfaction; invite ideas for desired new facilities, programs and
activities.
74
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP6: QUALITY, CONTINUED
v Conduct a community recreation survey approximately every five years to
better understand community recreation priorities and needs.
vi Update GIS data for parks and facilities to use in lifecycle planning,
maintenance tracking and long-range park and facility planning.
6.F Develop and update recreation program management tools, data-tracking
procedures and fees.
i Maintain updated registration software to facilitate program registration,
facility reservation and data tracking to help ensure the best customer
service possible.
ii Define a fee philosophy, methodology and cost recovery goals for fees and
charges for programs and services.
iii Re-evaluate options for park and facility rentals to expand options for
part, half and full day reservations to support more family gatherings and
group activities.
iv Create and implement a program evaluation and forecasting tool to assist
in decision-making about what types of programs to provide, which
classes to cancel and when to introduce new or trending activities.
v Track program participation, cost recovery, and customer satisfaction
data by program service area and supplemental service area to track
participation, measure the success of different types of programs, and
evaluate programming needs.
vi Request demographic and geographic data from participants to track
what demographic and geographic areas of the city are well-served and
underserved.
vii Provide staff and analyst resources to regularly evaluate data, report
findings, and develop opportunities.
viii Conduct a review of the recreation brochure, and evaluate existing
programs and activities, as well as desired programs. Create a marketing
plan.
ix Conduct a periodic program review and analysis to help maintain
program quality, responsiveness and relevance.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
75
6.G Clarify roles, responsibilities, communication and scheduling procedures
and provide staff training to enhance program quality and customer service.
i Enhance program quality by ensuring that recreation staff receive program
training, certifications and professional development opportunities, as
well as direction and mentorship, particularly when new programs are
initiated.
ii Clarify staff policies and procedures, as well as the chain of command, on
program decision-making.
iii Improve relationships and communication with partners, volunteers and
contract providers by appointing a coordinator lead for each.
iv Continue to discuss partnership options to offer joint programs and
services or programs in joint-use facilities with the De Anza College,
Cupertino Union School District, Fremont Union High School District, the
Cupertino Library, YMCA and other partners.
v Increase drop-in programs, short-duration programs with three or fewer
classes, and flexible program registration options to meet the needs of
busy residents.
vi Develop an outreach mechanism to solicit and evaluate community
suggestions for new programs, activities or offerings.
vii Connect with new residents by providing information about existing and
new recreation programs.
76
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MASTER PLAN GOAL 7: SUSTAINABILITY
MP7 Provide, manage and maintain parks, facilities, programs and services through sound management and stewardship, sustainable choices and the wise use of resources.
7.A Leverage resources and diversify funding sources to support capital
development and ongoing operations. (Financial Sustainability)
i Continue to be fiscally and financially prudent in funding the park and
recreation needs of the Cupertino community.
ii Coordinate with City leaders to expand the Public Works and Recreation
and Community Services Departments’ resources to support additional
park land and facilities, park and natural area maintenance, recreation
activities and the arts.
iii Develop a fee philosophy and cost recovery goals for programs and rental
facilities to reflect changing market conditions and the community’s
ability to pay.
iv Explore adding a facility use fee to all program fees to provide dedicated
funding for maintenance, renovation and facility replacement.
v Expand staff capacity for grant writing, grant management, solicitation
of sponsorships and donations, and exploration of new revenue sources.
Explore grant funding opportunities and pursue those that are suitable.
vi Diversify funding sources, considering sponsorships, bond measures,
operational levies and other alternatives to fund capital projects,
operations, maintenance, and programming.
vii Evaluate options to develop and adopt an impact fee methodology
to enable the City to collect fees that address the impacts on the park,
recreation and trail system based on development in residential,
commercial and industrial areas.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
77
viii Leverage resources by collaborating with partners, stakeholders
and volunteers. Explore formal public/ public and public/private
partnerships for facility development and operations.
ix Define appropriate use of enterprise funds.
x Establish a 501(c)(3) parks foundation or formalize a relationship with an
established 501(c)(3) to position Cupertino to benefit from philanthropic
giving. Explore mechanisms to support accepting property and life
estate gifts or other types of donations that could support the parks and
recreation system.
7.B Develop and implement customized guidelines and best practices for
sustainable park design and development. (Sustainable Choices)
i Consider permeable surfacing in at least 75% of new paved trails and
50% of new parking lots. Stay apprised of new pervious materials and
technologies.
ii Use local and recycled materials in building and services.
iii Pursue green building or LEED-compliant construction in the
development of indoor facilities. [This does not require LEED
certification.]
iv If additional parking is needed at a site, prior to converting existing green
space to parking use, evaluate if underground or structured solutions are
viable (including financially), and explore opportunities to share parking
at nearby sites or other such options.
78
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP7: SUSTAINABILITY, CONTINUED
v Develop water-efficient, climate-controlled irrigation systems in all new
parks. Update current irrigation systems when parks are renovated to
improve water efficiency.
vi In new splash pads, spraygrounds and fountains, prioritize designs that
use systems which clean and recirculate the water, or that collect the water
and use it for irrigation.
vii Incorporate water efficient fixtures in all new restrooms and water
fountains. Add low-flow devices in all existing restrooms toilets.
viii Consider the use of graywater where available for irrigation at parks and
possible public demonstration purposes.
ix Support the City’s Zero Waste Policy (adopted December 2017) by
encouraging recycling and composting. Initiate a system-wide recycling
program for all parks. Provide recycling receptacles, information and
publicity at all large special events.
x Compost grass clippings, leaves, twigs, branches, and other garden or
compostable refuse generated in public parks. Continue to chip trimmed
tree branches from appropriate species and repurpose as mulch.
xi Integrate native and/or climate appropriate plants where possible.
Consider turf alternatives, except where turf is delivering a beneficial use
(sport field, golf course, play area, etc.) or providing desired green space.
Promote drought-resistant/ low water use turf species.
xii Continue to reduce the use of toxics and hazardous chemicals through
Cupertino’s Integrated Pest Management program.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
79
MP7: SUSTAINABILITY, CONTINUED
xiii Emphasize efficient, renewable, and/or clean energy sources including
solar and co-generation. Add solar-powered features in new or renovated
facilities where appropriate.
xiv Provide electric vehicle charging stations in parking areas. Strive to meet
the most current standards for fast charging.
7.C Steward resources and maintain assets to ensure high quality parks and
facilities. (Sound Management and Stewardship)
i Ensure that a high level of park maintenance continues to provide safe
and attractive parks, and to enhance user experience.
ii Ensure maintenance and operations dollars are available before
constructing new facilities; create and adopt an associated policy.
iii Evaluate the establishment of a ‘sinking fund’ or other funding strategy
to address major maintenance and planned replacements of facilities and
equipment.
iv Increase maintenance where needed to support increased programming,
activities and facility reservations in parks.
v Invest more funds in natural resource stewardship, and protect cultural,
historical and natural resources in parks.
vi Improve maintenance efficiencies. Avoid difficult-to-maintain artistic
amenities that do not function well.
vii Ensure resources are available to provide maintenance and upkeep of
existing facilities to lengthen their lifespan and reduce the number of
deferred projects in the future.
viii Invest in training for City tree crews and engage outside professional
services as needed to ensure sustainable and effective tree management.
Update and expand the City tree inventory to include all mature trees on
City park land and rights-of-way. Consider creating a staff Urban Forester
position.
ix Train staff in maintenance and stewardship of natural areas, green
infrastructure, and bioswales, so that these features thrive and the
integrity of natural resources on City property is maintained. Involve
expert professional services as needed to support informed and ongoing
care for habitat areas.
80
SYSTEMWIDE OBJECTIVES & ACTIONS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP7: SUSTAINABILITY, CONTINUED
x Develop guidelines for vegetation management in the Stevens Creek
corridor to promote natural resource stewardship.
xi Focus on storm water management and green infrastructure when
designing or renovating City parks. For example, consider installing a
‘storm water management garden’ on City or public property to showcase
green infrastructure techniques.
xii Work with Sustainability Division staff on a long-term climate adaptation
plan to prepare parks and natural resources for future climate change
(increased flooding, warmer temperatures, less predictable rainfall,
increased extreme heat days e.g.).
7.D Collaborate with partners, stakeholders and volunteers to take advantage of
opportunities, widen participation and strengthen offerings. (Wise Use of
Resources)
i Continue coordinating with the School Districts to identify joint-use
opportunities for indoor and outdoor facilities, as well as co-development
opportunities for new parks and facilities. Support shared program
initiatives by sharing information and facilitating regular coordination
meetings. Collaborate with schools outside the city limits that could help
address recreation and Master Plan goals.
ii Enhance recreational programs and services through new partnerships
with agencies, recreation districts and non-profit organizations that
provide recreational programming.
iii Maintain and strengthen current collaboration and existing agreements
with agencies and non-profit organizations, including the Library District
and Northwest YMCA, to ensure progressive excellence in the facilities,
programs, and services provided.
iv Pursue opportunities to partner with the business community, private
organizations and non-traditional partners in areas of joint interest to
provide excellent parks and recreation facilities and expand recreation
offerings to the community.
v Continue to cultivate business partners and sponsorships for facilities,
activities and services that reflect shared interests and/or also help
address employee needs.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER THREE
81
vi Identify equity partners to help build, operate and/or program new
public facilities.
vii Pursue partnerships with private developers that are providing common
open space to make such spaces available to the public.
viii Expand volunteer opportunities for all ages; continue to identify and
publicize volunteer opportunities that support youth development
programs; make volunteer opportunities easier to locate on the
Department website.
ix Include a role for trained or supervised volunteers in vegetation
management at key sites, such as the Stevens Creek corridor; provide
periodic oversight and guidance regarding the corridor conditions and
management by qualified professionals.
x Continue discussing joint opportunities with other jurisdictions, such as
adjacent cities, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, and Santa
Clara County, to achieve Master Plan goals, and to provide facilities that
may draw from outside the city (such as a cricket field).
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS
4
85
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
The systemwide objectives and actions provide
strong guidance for park renovations and
facility development. There are a range of
project opportunities that support Master Plan
goals, objectives, and actions. Opportunities
for Cupertino’s parks system include the
development of new parks and trails, major
new facilities and renovations to the City’s
most beloved park sites. These investments will
enhance recreation opportunities, the quality
of parks for all residents, and the protection of
Cupertino’s natural resources.
This chapter describes the types of improvements
that will implement the Master Plan’s goals and
objectives. These opportunities are divided into
the following categories, based on the types and
scale of the projects:
•Enhancements to existing parks
•Enhancements to existing trails
•Potential joint use opportunities
•New acquisitions
•Potential major new facilities
•Expanded services
•Added recreation elements
•Natural vegetation enhancements
While this chapter presents highlights only,
Appendix E includes descriptions of the
City’s park sites, along with recent or planned
improvements and enhancement opportunities.
Appendix F identifies short and longer term
enhancements for parks, recreation facilities and
recreation elements by type.
The opportunities outlined in this plan will help
guide future planning, decisions on site selection
and features, and project phasing.
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS
4
86
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING PARKS
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
neighborhood park opportunities
Sustain existing assets and diversify recreation
experiences by enhancing facilities throughout
Cupertino’s fourteen neighborhood parks. (See
Appendix F for more detailed opportunities for
each park site.) Opportunities for new and/or
enhanced recreation facilities have been identified
in most of Cupertino’s neighborhood parks, with
seven neighborhood parks including short-term
opportunities and twelve neighborhood parks
including longer-term opportunities.
POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS
Master Plan/Design Process:
▪6 neighborhood parks
Potential Added Recreation Facilities:
▪11 neighborhood parks
Potential Natural Vegetation
Enhancement:
▪12 neighborhood parks
Potential Major Facility Development:
▪4 neighborhood parks
Major Reinvestment:
▪5 neighborhood parks
Minor Reinvestment:
▪10 neighborhood parks
Assets Sustained/Replaced:
▪8 neighborhood parks
SELECTED ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES:
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Short Term
•Sustain existing uses in all large neighborhood
parks.
•Add and enhance recreational facilities, with
elements such as community gardens, dog
areas, sport courts and loop paths in suitable
large parks such as Jollyman, Wilson and
Hoover.
•Diversify play environments with all-inclusive
or nature play elements in parks such as
87
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
Jollyman, Creekside, Linda Vista, Portal and
Varian.
Short and Longer Term
•Initiate planning and design processes for
new facilities and renovations of existing
facilities in Creekside Park, Linda Vista Park,
Monta Vista Park, Portal Park, Wilson Park,
and Jollyman Park.
Longer Term
•Continue the types of investments and
enhancements initiated in the short-term.
•Provide trailhead amenities and connections
to existing/proposed bike facilities in
Creekside Park, Jollyman Park, Linda Vista
Park, Monta Vista Park, Portal Park, Varian
Park, and Wilson Park.
•Evaluate development or redevelopment
opportunities for major new recreational
facilities in Creekside, Jollyman Park, Monta
Vista Park, and Wilson Park.
•Renovate and enhance Creekside Park, Monta
Vista Park, Jollyman Park, and Wilson Park
to better support sports, active and passive
recreation and enhance social gathering
opportunities and neighborhood and
community activities.
•Renovate and enhance Portal Park and Linda
Vista Park to increase recreation diversity and
enhance social gathering opportunities and
activities.
SELECTED ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES:
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Short Term
•Sustain existing uses in all small
neighborhood parks.
Longer Term
•Improve connections to proposed bike
routes/trails and surrounding neighborhoods
and trailheads in Franco Park and Somerset
Park.
•Add small-scale recreation facilities such as
nature play elements, community gardens
or other features to diversify recreation in
Somerset Park and Three Oaks Park.
•Support neighborhood events with event
utilities and infrastructure in Three Oaks
Park.
88
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING PARKS
COMMUNITY PARKS
SELECTED ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
• Develop a site master plan for Memorial Park.
• Complete the Stevens Creek Corridor Master
Plan.
Short Term
• Consider nature integration, shade, ADA accessibility, pathway and seating improvements, amphitheater improvements and pond re-purposing at Memorial Park.
• Phase in improvements guided by the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
Longer Term
• Phase in improvements to existing Memorial Park facilities and add recreation opportunities as guided by the Site Master Plan.
• If appropriate, proceed with the development of any selected major new facilities identified for Memorial Park, the expansion of an adjacent recreation building (Sports Center, Senior Center), or a possible combined facility.
• Renovate Stocklmeir Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry Farm Park, and/or McClellan Ranch Preserve, West and other corridor parcels as guided by the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS
Pursue the following opportunities
at Memorial Park and Stevens
Creek Corridor Park:
▪Potential Added Recreation Facilities
▪Potential Natural Vegetation
Enhancement
▪Potential Major Facility Development
▪Major Reinvestments
▪Assets Sustained/Replaced
community parks opportunities
Invest in Memorial Park as a community hub
by renovating the site as a multi-use and civic-
focused event space. Complete the Stevens
Creek Corridor Master Plan to guide short and
longer-term opportunities for renovation and
enhancement. Implement priority short- and
longer-term opportunities.
89
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING PARKS
SPECIAL USE SITES
SELECTED ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
• Sustain existing uses at Library Field pending decision on implementation of Civic Center Master Plan.
• Enhance Mary Avenue Dog Park with shade, seating, and dog amenities.
• Implement seismic upgrades to the Sports Center. Consider implementing improvements to the locker rooms, showers, restrooms and recreation areas approved in the 2018-19 budget.
Longer Term
• Relocate the cricket field if a better site is identified, and consider long-term options for redeveloping Library Field as civic center-related space or permanent green space.
• Renovate the Sports Center, potentially adding recreation uses compatible with the Memorial Park Master Plan, any related new facility business plan, and Public Works’ Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS
Pursue the following opportunities
at Civic Center, Sports Center,
and/or Mary Avenue Dog Park:
▪Potential Added Recreation Facilities
▪Potential Natural Vegetation
Enhancement
▪Potential Major Facility Development
▪Major & Minor Reinvestments
▪Assets Sustained/Replaced
special use facilities opportunities
Pursue opportunities to enhance Cupertino’s
special use sites, including the Mary Avenue Dog
Park and Civic Center (including Civic Center
Plaza, Community Hall and Library Field), and
the Cupertino Sports Center.
90
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
trail opportunities
Expand and enhance existing trails as part of a
larger effort to prioritize and implement priority
opportunities noted in the Bicycle Transportation
Plan, Pedestrian Transportation Plan, Cupertino
General Plan, and Countywide Trails Master
Plan. Support riparian corridor protection, nature
integration and improved park access.
SELECTED ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short and Longer term
• Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge & Trail:
Encourage connections between school, parks,
and regional destinations. Consider improved
habitat plantings on property north and south
of the bridge that provide year-round beauty
and seasonal interest. Evaluate off-street trail
extension southward to Stevens Creek Blvd.
ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING TRAILS
VARIOUS TRAIL CORRIDORS
• Creekside Park and Connection to Regnart
Creek Trail: Consider adding trail amenities,
enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor,
and adding green infrastructure. Encourage
connections between school, parks and trail.
• Saratoga Creek Trail: Consider adding
trail amenities, enhancing and protecting
the riparian corridor, and adding green
infrastructure. Encourage connections
northward to Stevens Creek Blvd. and to
regional destinations.
• Stevens Creek Trail: Consider adding trail
amenities and adding green infrastructure.
Encourage pedestrian and bike connections
between trail, City parks, County parks and
nearby schools. Work with the County to
implement a pedestrian-bicycle access to
Rancho San Antonio from Stevens Creek
Blvd. with parking/trailhead amenities per
the adopted Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens
Creek Trail Feasibility Study. Continue to
implement habitat restoration and to protect
the riparian corridor. Install interpretive
signage/elements including for historical
resources.
POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS
Short and Longer Term
▪Potential Trail Development
▪Potential Added Recreation
Facilities
▪Potential Natural Vegetation
Enhancement
▪Minor Reinvestment
91
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
POTENTIAL JOINT USE OPPORTUNITIES
SCHOOL PARTNERSHIPS
• Facilitate connections between schools and
any proposed nearby bikeways and trails.
• Pursue partnerships with School District to
improve public access to recreation facilities
at Garden Gate Elementary School or to add
and enhance recreation facilities to address
nearby needs.
• Pursue partnerships with the School District
at Hyde Middle and/or nearby Sedgewick
Elementary to improve public access to
recreation opportunities or to add and
enhance recreation facilities.
• Encourage connections between Kennedy
Middle School, proposed trail and nearby
parks. Pursue partnerships with School
District to improve public access or to add or
enhance recreation facilities.
• Encourage connections between Regnart
Elementary School, proposed trail and nearby
parks. Pursue partnerships with School
District to improve public access or to add or
enhance recreation facilities.
• Encourage connections and shared uses
between Stevens Creek Elementary School
and Varian Park.
POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS
Short and Longer Term
▪Potential Added Recreation
Facilities (with Public Access)
▪Minor Reinvestment
▪Assets Sustained/Replaced
school joint use opportunities
Coordinate with the School Districts and
other potential partners to enhance access to
community sports fields and recreation facilities.
Improve park/school connections and trail/
school access.
SELECTED ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short and Longer term
• Continue joint-use agreement for sport field
uses at all existing joint use sites.
• Explore options to broaden sharing of
indoor and outdoor recreation facilities as
appropriate at existing sites and potentially at
added schools.
92
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
NEW ACQUISITIONS
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND TRAILS
park opportunities
If opportunities arise, acquire and develop new
neighborhood parks in targeted underserved areas.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/ OPPORTUNITIES
•New acquisitions especially in north and east
Cupertino (e.g., Lawrence-Mitty parcels on west
side of Lawrence Expressway)
•Joint-use sites at schools
•Public-private partnerships if opportunities arise
trail opportunities
Coordinate to develop trails from the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, Pedestrian Transportation Plan,
the Countywide Trails Master Plan and this Master
Plan that support multi-use recreation, park access and
connectivity to community destinations.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/ OPPORTUNITIES
•New corridors as identified in City pedestrian and
bicycle transportation plans, including acquisition of
Lawrence-Mitty parcels on west side of Lawrence
Expressway
•Regional trails in cooperation with other agencies
and jurisdictions
•Enhanced trails in community parks and large
neighborhood parks
•Linda Vista Park to McClellan Ranch Preserve Trail.
(Pursue steps to support property acquisition and trail
implementation.)
•Other Potential Trails, such as Junipero Serra Trail
or Historic De Anza Trail. (Complete feasibility
analysis, and develop multi-use trails if feasible.)
POTENTIAL PARK ELEMENTS
▪play opportunities
▪seating
▪green space/open lawn
▪small picnic area
▪looped walking path
▪game space
▪active-use courts
▪neighborhood-serving amenities
▪landscaping/native plantings
▪
POTENTIAL TRAIL ELEMENTS
▪accessible multi-use trails
▪ signage/way inding
▪distance/mileage markers
▪information kiosks
▪crossings
▪seating
▪interpretive elements or art
▪ outdoor itness equipment
▪adjacent jogging trail
▪green infrastructure
▪green space protection or
habitat enhancement
93
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
POTENTIAL MAJOR NEW FACILITY
AQUATICS FACILITY
aquatics facility opportunities
Pursue opportunities to partner with existing
aquatics providers, including schools. If a new
city facility is desired, prepare a market analysis
and business plan. If a new aquatics facility is
warranted and pursued, consider providing
a year-round swimming facility designed for
recreation and instructional swimming, aquatic
exercise, lap swimming, and pool events.
SITE SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION
If pursed, develop one facility in an accessible
location, considering sites in central and east
Cupertino or opportunities to co-develop with
another centralized City facility.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Creekside Park
• Jollyman Park
• Wilson Park
• Potential new site
• Public-private partnership
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪lap pool
▪warm water instructional pool
▪recreation pool
▪hot tub
▪zero depth entry
▪lazy river
▪water play features
▪lifeguard/office space
▪locker rooms
▪family changing rooms
▪outdoor showers
▪lounge
▪spectator areas
▪birthday party rooms
▪concessions
▪rental features
▪nearby parking
94
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
POTENTIAL MAJOR NEW FACILITY
PERFORMING & FINE ARTS CENTER
arts facility opportunities
Pursue opportunities to partner with existing
performing or fine arts venues. If a new city
facility is desired, prepare a market analysis
and business plan. If a new facility is warranted
and pursued, consider developing a community
auditorium or fine and performing arts center
to house community-scale performances and
support daytime arts and recreation programs as
well as evening programs and events.
SITE SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION
If pursed, develop one facility in a centralized
location near businesses, restaurants and/
or attractions. Consider space near potential
partners, Cupertino’s civic center, or nightlife-
oriented downtown areas.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Civic Center/Library Field
• Potential new site
• Public-private partnership
• Other/repurposed building
• Joint use facility
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪industry-standard theater
▪pull-down screen
▪dressing rooms
▪backstage storage
▪box office/lobby
▪concessions
▪smaller theater/rehearsal space
▪dance studio/floor
▪recording & television studio
▪arts wing for programming
▪arts/crafts/ceramics spaces
▪music instruction rooms
▪reservable multi-purpose room
▪dance studio
▪maker/incubator space
▪catering kitchen
▪indoor/outdoor event space
▪art plaza
▪ceramics/crafts/art spaces
95
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
POTENTIAL MAJOR NEW FACILITY
GYMNASIUM COMPLEX AND MULTI-USE RECREATION CENTER
gym and multi-use recreation center opportunities
Pursue opportunities to partner with existing
gymnasium venues. If a new city facility is
desired, prepare a market analysis and business
plan. If a new facility is warranted and pursued,
consider providing a multi-generational
gymnasium complex and recreation center to
provide sports court spaces and support other
activities.
SITE SELECTION AND DISTRIBUTION
If pursued, develop one centrally located facility.
Consider co-locating the facility with an aquatics
center or a teen space.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Creekside Park
• Jollyman Park
• Wilson Park
• Potential new site
• Public-private partnership
• Joint use facility
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪full size basketball court(s) with
bleachers and dividing walls
▪volleyball, badminton, pickleball
▪fitness studios
▪gymnastics space
▪multipurpose rooms
▪smaller court
▪senior fitness room
▪multi-purpose rooms (reservable)
▪meeting rooms
▪program space
▪social space/coffee kiosk
▪teen room
▪childcare room
▪climbing wall
▪track
▪locker rooms
▪family changing rooms
▪lobby/front desk/reception
▪equipment room
96
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
EXPANDED SERVICES
SPACE FOR SENIORS AND TEENS
senior center opportunities
Provide additional recreation space for older
adults, and both fit and frail seniors. Evaluate
opportunities to provide senior services at other
locations; explore locations and develop pilot
activities. Explore partnerships. If additional space
at the Senior Center is desired, conduct a study
to evaluate renovations that would enhance the
function, capacity and financial sustainability
of the Senior Center and assess demand. If an
addition is warranted and pursued, expand the
Senior Center for increased senior population.
Include senior-friendly space at new or existing
recreation/community or fine arts centers or gyms.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/ OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Potential aquisition
• Public-private partnerships if opportunities arise
teen center opportunities
Pursue opportunities to partner with teen services
providers (such as schools or library). Create a
unique teen space or activities that may include
student union-style gathering and program space
and active indoor uses for teens.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/ OPPORTUNITIES
• Creekside Park
• Civic Center/Library Field
• Wilson Park
• Special Use Site
• Schools (mobile activities)
POTENTIAL SENIOR CENTER
ELEMENTS
▪exercise rooms
▪half-court gym/ fitness space
▪programming space
▪arts & crafts room
▪music rooms
▪additional classrooms
▪meeting rooms
▪private consultation/health room
▪front desk/reception area
▪accessible parking and drop off
▪outdoor low impact game space,
gardens, and activity areas
POTENTIAL TEEN SPACE ELEMENTS
▪study room
▪kitchen and/or café
▪computer lab
▪game room
▪meeting/ program space
▪maker space/ creative space
▪open gym
▪basketball hoop
▪mobile programs and activities
97
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
ADDED RECREATION ELEMENTS
DIVERSE PLAY AREAS
nature play opportunities
Provide nature play elements in parks to connect
people to nature and support experiential play.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Creekside Park
• Wilson Park
• Linda Vista Park
• Portal Park
• Other neighborhood parks
• Trail corridors
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪logs, stumps, boulders
▪water features
▪sand, mud, rocks
▪movable pieces
▪plants and trees
water play opportunities
Integrate a variety of water play opportunities at
existing parks.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Other large neighborhood or community
parks
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪playable water channel
▪spray play areas
▪splash pads
▪sand play area
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪variety of inclusive play features
▪sensory stimulation
▪parallel play/challenge elements
▪diverse seating arrangements
▪shade
universal / all-inclusive play opportunities
Support inclusive play by providing a destination
all-inclusive play area, and by incorporating
inclusive play elements at existing play areas.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Memorial Park
• Jollyman Park
• Creekside Park
• Wilson Park
• Existing play areas in other large
neighborhood parks
98
OPPORTUNITY HIGHLIGHTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
ADDED RECREATION ELEMENTS
UNIQUE RECREATION FEATURES
neighborhood event space opportunities
Provide space to support small group events,
programs and outdoor classes.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Creekside Park
• Jollyman Park
• Three Oaks Park
• Existing areas in other neighborhood parks
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪stage
▪portable screen
▪pavilion
▪outdoor classroom
▪lawn area
diverse features opportunities
Add facilities which appeal to Cupertino’s
diverse population and reflect Cupertino’s
unique character.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• All suitable City parks
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪outdoor fitness equipment
▪outdoor chess
▪tai chi
▪disc golf
▪climbing spire
▪outdoor table tennis
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪full-size basketball courts
▪pickleball courts
▪community-size cricket field
▪multi-use rectangular fields
sports facility opportunities
Diversify recreation and sports opportunities.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• Sport-oriented City parks
• Other suitable City parks
• School fields
• Other partnerships
• Indoor gym space in local schools if available
99
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FOUR
NATURAL VEGETATION ENHANCEMENTS
INTEGRATED NATURAL ELEMENTS
natural vegetation opportunities
Integrate natural plantings and reduce turf areas
where not actively used for recreation.
POTENTIAL LOCATIONS/OPPORTUNITIES
• City parks with natural features
• All other suitable City parks
POTENTIAL ELEMENTS
▪native plantings
▪natural area restoration
▪habitat enhancements
▪bioswales
▪invasive plant removal
▪park forests
▪orchards
▪successional tree plantings
▪pollinator patches, gardens
and corridors
▪bee hives
▪bird habitat, baths and houses
▪riparian enhancements
▪lawn reduction
IMPLEMENTATION
5
103
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FIVE
As described in earlier chapters, this Master
Plan presents a comprehensive vision for the
evolution of Cupertino’s parks system that
builds on the park assets already in place, adds
new major facilities and incorporates more
programming at more locations. This chapter
discusses how Cupertino will move forward
to implement the vision, goals and projects
described in earlier chapters.
• Implementing Early Action Initiatives
describes immediate action items and their
timelines.
• Advancing Additional Recreation Elements
summarizes a variety of enhancements for
the existing parks and recreation system.
These enhancements are the ones that many
residents and decision makers feel should
be emphasized at this time. Short term
implementation opportunities are possible for
each.
• Advancing Major Projects discusses capital
and operating costs of potential new major
facilities.
• Funding the Vision summarizes the current
levels of investment in parks and recreation.
• Prioritizing Capital Projects introduces tools
for sequencing capital projects.
To provide additional implementation
information, Appendices F, G and H supplement
this chapter with detail on project costs, a menu
of potential funding methods, and tools for
prioritizing projects. Officials have consistently
emphasized the importance of pursuing
partnerships with school districts, recreation
providers, and others, as a first step to help
deliver the goals of the Master Plan, rather
than pursuing new large expensive recreation
facilities.
Implementing Early Action
Initiatives
Due to their level of community support and
interest, Cupertino has already implemented
several early action initiatives. These are projects
that are already funded in the capital program, or
projects that are now underway, or are programs
and offerings that have recently been added.
These initiatives address community priorities
and are aligned with Master Plan goals, actions
and opportunities. These warranted early
action and meet one or more of the following
conditions: necessary first step, time sensitivity,
previously funded capital project, or item that
can be accomplished with current staffing. These
initiatives are described on pages 104-107.
IMPLEMENTATION
5
104
IMPLEMENTATION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP2:
CONNECTION
MP3: EQUITABLE
ACCESS
MP4:
ENHANCEMENT
MP5:
ACTIVITY
MP7:
SUSTAINABILITY
MP6:
QUALITY
MP1:
CONSERVATION
GOAL
ALIGNMENT
MP2:
CONNECTION
MP3: EQUITABLE
ACCESS
MP4:
ENHANCEMENT
MP5:
ACTIVITY
MP6:
QUALITY
MP1:
CONSERVATION
GOAL
ALIGNMENT
CUPERTINO LOOP TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION
The Public Works Department is advancing the development of key
trails, walkways and bikeways through Cupertino. Near-term trail
work will focus on the feasibility, and if approved, the design and
implementation of the Regnart Creek and Junipero Serra Trails, which are
key segments of an envisioned loop trail connecting parks to schools and
community destinations.
TIMELINE
2-4 years
MEMORIAL PARK SITE MASTER PLAN
AND INITIAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS
The City has already funded a project to develop a Memorial Park Master
Plan that will guide reinvestment in Cupertino’s largest park and one of
its most significant public gathering places. The City would like to move
forward quickly with improvements to the amphitheater and pathway
circulation, as well as take steps to repurpose and renovate the inactive
pond area. Since these projects affect other opportunities for the site,
as noted in Chapter 4 and Appendices E and F, a guiding Master Plan
is a necessary first step before needed improvements can be made. The
Master Plan effort will include a robust public engagement process to
provide opportunities for the community to weigh in on the future of
Memorial Park.
TIMELINE
12-month planning process to be initiated upon adoption of this Master
Plan; improvements as sequenced in the site master plan
MP7:
SUSTAINABILITY
105
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FIVE
MP3: EQUITABLE
ACCESS
MP5:
ACTIVITY
MP7:
SUSTAINABILITY
MP6:
QUALITY
MP1:
CONSERVATION
GOAL
ALIGNMENT
STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN COMPLETION
The Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan addresses public lands along
Stevens Creek from McClellan Road to Stevens Creek Boulevard. Among
the sites included are McClellan Ranch Preserve, McClellan Ranch West,
Blackberry Farm Park, Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Stocklmeir Ranch, and
22050 Stevens Creek Boulevard. This Master Plan was deferred while the
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan was underway, allowing
overarching community priorities for parks to be coordinated with Stevens
Creek corridor enhancements. With the guiding vision and goals of the System
Master Plan in place, the City will be positioned to reinitiate and complete
the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan. A preferred concept for the Stevens
Creek corridor will be advanced and refined given the overall guidance of this
Master Plan.
TIMELINE
Reinitiate the project after approval of the Master Plan, with a goal of
completion within 12 months
EXPANDED TEEN OPPORTUNITIES
To quickly respond to the need for more teen programming, the City has
implemented new activities and begun coordinating with partners to broaden
recreation opportunities for Cupertino teens beyond the Teen Center. Recreation
staff has initiated several new activities and programs focusing on leadership
skills, stress reduction and socialization. The first Cupertino Teen Leadership
Academy was held during summer of 2018. The first Junior Swim Instructor
program was also successfully launched in 2018. The Young Naturalist
program for 7th and 8th graders was launched in 2018. The <hack> Cupertino
overnight hackathon debuted in 2017 and is flourishing. A Youth Activity Board
composed of teens began convening in January 2019. Its role is to advise and
sponsor teen activities in collaboration with the Teen Commission and City
staff. The first ‘Bobatino’ teen event was held at Main Street Park in September
2018 and attracted over 600 teens.
From October through November 2018, the first off-site teen center pilot
program was launched at Lawson Middle School. The Parks and Recreation
Department and School initiated bringing Teen Center activities to teens at
Lawson Middle School. Additional mobile teen programs are being considered,
and these will be evaluated to determine the most effective programming
approaches for Cupertino’s teens. The Teen Center was renovated in early 2019
with flexible, reservable “Infinity Room” space and new amenities.
TIMELINE
Continue pilot program implementation in collaboration with Cupertino Union
School District in 2020
MP2:
CONNECTION
MP3: EQUITABLE
ACCESS
MP4:
ENHANCE-
MP5:
ACTIVITY
MP7:
SUSTAINABILITY
MP6:
QUALITY
MP1:
CONSERVATION
GOAL
ALIGNMENT
MP2:
CONNECTION
MP4:
ENHANCEMENT
106
IMPLEMENTATION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MP2:
CONNECTION
MP3: EQUITABLE
ACCESS
MP4:
ENHANCEMENT
MP5:
ACTIVITY
MP7:
SUSTAINABILITY
MP6:
QUALITY
MP1:
CONSERVATION
GOAL
ALIGNMENT
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ACTIVATION
Cupertino residents desire more activities and programs in their
neighborhoods. To respond to this need, Cupertino began testing new
formats to expand recreation programming and events in neighborhood
parks. In summer 2018, the City launched a Neighborhood Events
program that brought recreation activities to 11 parks and public venues
as a pilot program. Programming like this can be implemented much
faster than developing new facilities and can more readily respond to
neighborhood interests and activity needs. More neighborhood-scale
activities are in the works for 2019, drawing from lessons learned in 2018,
per presentations to Parks and Recreation Commission in October 2018
and City Council in December 2018.
TIMELINE
The second year of neighborhood programs continued in summer 2019
with over 30 events, including concerts, movies, dance, fitness, “art in
the park,” and several special themed events, as well as Cupertino’s first
overnight campout
PARKS AND RECREATION STRATEGIC PLAN
Parks and Recreation staff is developing a Strategic Plan that will guide
the Department’s actions and efforts for the next three to five years. It
will build upon the Master Plan. The Strategic Plan will identify the
projects, programs and tasks targeted for action in the near term. Staff
plans to invite input on a proposed Strategic Plan after approval of the
Master Plan. It will serve as a ‘road map’ for near-term implementation
of community priorities for our parks and recreation system.
TIMELINE
A proposed Strategic Plan within 3 months of Master Plan approval, with
immediate launch of first year actions in 2020
MP2:
CONNECTION
MP3: EQUITABLE
ACCESS
MP4:
ENHANCEMENT
MP5:
ACTIVITY
MP6:
QUALITY
MP1:
CONSERVATION
GOAL
ALIGNMENT
MP7:
SUSTAINABILITY
107
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FIVE
advancing additional
recreation elements
Based upon the public input process, City residents
support a wide variety of enhancements to the
current parks and recreation system. There is broad
support for a number of features and amenities that
can be implemented relatively easily, for less cost
and resources than needed for a New Major Facility.
Among the items of high interest are:
• Community gardens at more locations
• Basketball courts
• Walking paths in parks and looped paths
• Outdoor exercise equipment
• Nature play
• All-inclusive play
• More shade in parks
• Native/pollinator-friendly plantings, nature
enhancements and access to nature
Other items of particular interest include:
• Neighborhood events in neighborhood parks
• Dog parks or off-leash dog areas at suitable sites
• Recreation variety (pickleball court striping,
outdoor ping pong, etc.)
• A possible healing garden
Further areas of focus will affect decisions regarding
elements to pursue in the short term. These include
strong desire to:
• Address equity issues; improve geographic
distribution of parks and recreation facilities;
prepare a park acquisition plan that addresses
equity
• Provide strong teen and youth support
• Optimize the use of existing facilities; seek ways to
deliver more from what we have
• Actively pursue partnerships
Short Term Actions for Additional Recreation Elements
Options to improve community recreation within
the near term include the following actions noted in
Table F-3. Recommended implementation actions
will be vetted and sequenced in conjunction with the
upcoming Strategic Plan.
Nature Play: Create a pilot program at one site,
considering a park with good tree canopy and natural
features. Evaluate and pursue opportunities for a
destination nature play area.
All-Inclusive Play: Plan, design and build a
destination all-inclusive play area. Evaluate
and pursue opportunities to add inclusive play
options citywide at additional park sites that are
geographically distributed.
Water Play: Consider a water play feature as part
of the Memorial Park Master Plan. Develop an
action plan to identify top sites and prioritization for
implementing at least one new water play area in the
short term.
Improved Outdoor Space for Citywide Events:
Include better event infrastructure and improvements
to the amphitheater and circulation in the Memorial
Park Master Plan. Begin improvements, phased per
the site master plan timeline.
Improved Outdoor Space for Neighborhood Events:
Develop one pilot project. Provide hardscape/
softscape areas and access to power.
Multi-use Sport Fields: Explore options to keep the
existing lighted sports field at Memorial Park as part
of the site master plan. Explore joint use agreements
with schools to provide more access to existing sport
fields and indoor gymnasium space. Evaluate changes
to field scheduling and use permits to increase
capacity and usage.
Cricket Field: Explore opportunities to partner
with the County, Sunnyvale, School District or other
jurisdiction to create a shared/joint-use facility in
region to support youth and adult play.
108
IMPLEMENTATION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Dog Parks/Dog Areas: Identify potential sites for
additional dog parks or dog off-leash areas and
determine neighborhood support.
Basketball: Develop one or two basketball courts;
prioritize full-size courts.
Pickleball: Develop two or more courts. Consider
overlays or joint striping of existing tennis courts
that only support recreational play (i.e., do not jointly
stripe tournament courts). Consider pickleball striping
for multi-court tournament venue in conjunction with
the Memorial Park Master Plan.
Community Gardens: Develop a community
garden implementation plan that renovates in a
timely manner the existing site at McClellan Ranch
and identifies other suitable sites and priorities for
implementation. Add one or more community garden
in an underutilized area or unneeded lawn area within
a park, preferably in an area with higher density
population.
Recreation Diversity in Outdoor Settings: Plan and
develop one pilot project in the first year. Thereafter,
rotate through parks and update one to two parks
per year with new elements such as outdoor fitness
equipment, outdoor table tennis, looped paths with
mile markers, or other new features (see Table F-3 for
more possible options). Emphasize community desired
elements such as looped paths and fitness equipment.
Improved Comfort Amenities: Update amenities
and furnishings at one to two sites in conjunction with
other park projects. Amenities may include shade
shelters, varied types of seating, bike racks, water
bottle fillers, WiFi, and others (see Table F-3). Prioritize
parks with trails, with active walkers and that lack
shade. Prioritize adding shade to the parks system.
Natural Vegetation Enhancements: Integrate natural
elements into parks upon renovation or development.
Work with partners to identify significant natural
areas to prioritize enhancements and restoration
(potentially in conjunction with trail development).
Consider natural vegetation enhancements as part of
the Memorial Park Master Plan. Provide actionable
items that include pollinator, habitat and/or native
plantings in the upcoming Strategic Plan and/or
Capital Improvement Program.
advancing major projects
Through public outreach, City residents noted a desire
for several major projects. They are addressed in
Appendix F, Table F-2. Any of these projects would be
a significant commitment of resources, and therefore
none is expected to be implemented in the short
term, i.e., within the next seven years. These projects
are considered “major” because they require a large
capital investment and will require more operational
resources. For example, a new neighborhood park
requires capital dollars to buy land, design and
construct the park. This new park will then need to
be maintained, requiring more staff time and grounds
maintenance to keep the park clean and facilities
in working order. Activation of this new park with
neighborhood-scale programming will increase the
workload for Parks and Recreation staff. The City
will need to be prepared to allocate additional budget
dollars and consider additional staff positions as major
projects are implemented. This means that capital
costs as well as ongoing operational costs are both
important considerations in making decisions about
when and how to advance major projects.
Short Term Actions for Major Projects
Major Projects involve extensive lead time to
implement. Options to help address associated
community recreation needs in the near term include
the following actions noted in Table F-2. A more
formal set of recommended implementation actions
will be provided in the upcoming Strategic Plan.
New Neighborhood Parks: Explore joint use
agreements with schools and/or other partners to
improve access to existing facilities, especially in
109
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FIVE
underserved areas. Evaluate opportunities to acquire
or partner to develop appropriate property.
Trails and Trail Corridors: Coordinate with Public
Works to identify and implement project priorities.
Explore joint use agreements with the Water District
that support implementation of creek trails. Continue
to pursue opportunities for planned trail development.
Aquatics Facility: Explore partnerships with existing
providers. If a new City facility is desired in the
future, prepare a market analysis and business plan
to address site selection and program elements and
define anticipated costs including operating costs.
Consider an aquatics facility as part of the Memorial
Park Master Plan.
Performing and Fine Arts Center: Explore
partnership or rental opportunities with high schools
and De Anza College or other potential partners
to meet immediate needs for performing arts
space. Develop a pilot program using an existing
performance space. If a new City facility is desired
in the future, prepare a market analysis and business
plan to evaluate potential sites and program elements
and anticipated costs for a new performing and fine
arts center.
Gymnasium Complex/Multi-use Recreation Center:
Explore partnership and rental opportunities with
schools and existing providers. If a new City facility
is desired in the future, prepare a market analysis and
business plan to evaluate potential sites and program
elements and anticipated costs for a new center.
Consider opportunities to combine with the existing
Sports Center and/or a new aquatics center.
Enhanced Teen Services: Maintain the existing
teen center facility without significant reinvestment.
Explore new site or partnership opportunities to create
a unique teen space in Cupertino.
Expanded Senior Services: Evaluate interest in
senior-friendly recreation opportunities at alternative
locations; explore potential locations based on
results. Develop mobile activities as a test pilot to
gauge interest in new locations and new programs.
Explore partnership opportunities. Conduct a
facility evaluation to evaluate and implement facility
renovations that would enhance the function, capacity
and financial sustainability of the Senior Center to
address the growing number of seniors.
Other Replaced or Repurposed Existing Building:
Continue to maintain identified facilities noted
for potential replacement without significant
reinvestment. Consider the reuse of buildings and
space in conjunction with the development of other
major facilities. Coordinate with Public Works’
Facility Condition and Use Assessment to identify
and prioritize projects at buildings that warrant
reinvestment.
110
IMPLEMENTATION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Potential Project Estimated Capital Improvement Costs1
Neighborhood Parks, per 3-acre park $10,000,000 - $15,000,000
plus land acquisition, ~$30,000,000
Trails and Trail Corridors Not included – addressed in 2018 Pedestrian Plan and 2016
Bike Plan; Public Works is implementing priority projects
Aquatics Facility2 $45,000,000 - $60,000,000
Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use
Recreation Center2
$30,000,000 - $40,000,000
Performing & Fine Arts Center2 $60,000,000 - $100,000,000
Senior Center Expansion2 $15,000,000 - $25,000,000
Total $160,000,000 - $240,000,000
TABLE 1: PLANNING LEVEL COSTS FOR POTENTIAL MAJOR NEW OR EXPANDED FACILITIES
1 Capital costs are planning level costs in 2018 dollars. See Appendix F for information on assumptions.
2 Land acquisition costs are not expected for these projects; projects are anticipated to occur in existing parks or via
partnerships.
Potential Capital Costs for Major Projects
The Master Plan identifies a planning level cost range
for each of the potential major new or expanded
facilities, as described in Chapter 4 and detailed in
Appendix F. Assuming these are individual projects,
the total projected cost for implementation may
range from $160M and $240M (in 2018 dollars, not
accounting for inflation). While the range of costs will
be refined during preparation of the future facility
master plans and business plans required for each
project, Table 1 illustrates the potential magnitude
of investment needed for capital development.
These costs would be in addition to the anticipated
improvements and enhancements of existing parks.
For comparison, capital investment by the City varies
year-to-year, based on the contributions from major
development projects and grant funding. Across all
departments, the 5-year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for FY 2019 (adopted in June of 2018) included
just over $21 million in projects involving new
funding, as well as over $26 million in fully-funded
previous projects that were still in progress. (Note: In
October 2018, the City Council deferred or de-funded
a number of these projects.)
111
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FIVE
Source Capital Projects Operating Budget
General Fund X X
User Fees X X
Park Impact Fees X
Assessment/Community Facilities District X X
General Obligation Bond1 X
Parcel Tax1 X X
Operating Levy1 X
Public-Private Partnerships X X
Earned Revenue (sponsorships, licenses, concessions)X X
Grants X
1 Voter approval required.
TABLE 2: FUNDING SOURCES AND THEIR USE
Operating Costs for Major Projects
The City of Cupertino budgeted over $22 million in
2018-19 to provide park and recreation services for
the community, not including capital improvements.
This includes $17.4 million in funds tied to Recreation
and Community Services and another $4.5 million
for grounds maintenance, which is within the
Public Works Department’s budget. Adding and
programming additional parks and major facilities
to the parks system will require more funding for
operations.
To determine how much additional funding will
be needed for operations, Action 4.B.i in Chapter 3
calls for the preparation of a business plan prior to
major facility development. The business plan will
define the final design program for the facility and
also quantify the operating cost impact of each major
project, which will depend on its operating model and
revenue-generating potential. While some facilities
may generate revenue to offset operating costs, major
facilities typically need some level of operational
subsidy, especially during the first five years as
pilot programs are identified. Cupertino will need
to increase its operating budget to account for the
increased costs and increased staffing associated with
each major new or expanded facility. To give a sense
of these costs, Appendix F notes the range of potential
operating costs for major new or expanded facilities.
When the information from the business plan is in
hand, Cupertino can increase its budget allocations
accordingly to account for the projected operating cost
of the new facility.
funding the vision
The City of Cupertino will need to invest wisely in
the new parks, facilities, programs and events desired
by residents. Several Master Plan objectives, notably
Objectives 7.A and 7.C, include strategies to expand
existing funding resources and explore new ones. As
detailed in Appendix G, there are a variety of potential
funding sources to help fund park improvements
and service enhancements, some of which are already
in use in Cupertino. Some funding sources have
restrictions on use and can only be used for capital
projects. Table 2 summarizes the potential uses of
some of these different funding sources.
112
IMPLEMENTATION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
To carry out this park investment, the City
of Cupertino should consider the following
implementation steps (see also Goal 7.A):
• Establish Cupertino’s fee philosophy and cost
recovery goals for parks and recreation services.
• Update the fee structure for parks and recreation
services. As part of the update, consider
establishing a facility use fee as part of the
structure.
• Work closely with developers during the proposal
stage for new facilities to ensure that any
community benefit contributions are aligned with
the Master Plan and community priorities.
• Update Cupertino’s impact fee methodology to
enable the City to collect fees that address the
impacts on the parks system from development in
residential, commercial and industrial areas.
• Establish a 501(c)(3) parks foundation or formalize
a relationship with an established 501(c)(3) to
position Cupertino to benefit from philanthropic
giving. Explore mechanisms to support accepting
property and life estate gifts or other types of
donations.
• Explore formal public/public and public/
private partnerships for facility development and
operations.
• Explore grant funding opportunities and pursue
those that are suitable. This will require adequate
staffing levels to write the grants and conduct
compliance activities. Matching funding may also
be required.
• Evaluate feasibility of new revenue sources,
including exploring sponsorships.
• Explore the feasibility of voter-approved funding
for major projects, including a parcel tax or bond as
one of the methods to be evaluated.
prioritizing capital projects
This Master Plan provides opportunities and funding
strategies that will be implemented over the next 20
years. During that time frame, the City will update its
Capital Improvement Plan many times and will need
to prioritize which parks and recreation system capital
projects should be advanced. In addition, over the
20-year planning horizon, recommended projects may
evolve, and new project ideas may arise in response
to new opportunities or needs. For these reasons, the
Master Plan includes two tools to prioritize capital
projects. These tools are included as worksheets in
Appendix H. This section provides an overview of the
tools and how to use them.
Tool: Goal and Community Priority Alignment Checklist
The Goal and Community Priority Alignment
Checklist allows the City to evaluate new projects to
determine if they are consistent with the direction of
the Master Plan. All projects should advance at least
one community priority (as noted in Chapter 2) and
one Master Plan Goal (as noted in Chapters 2 and
3). Once a project is found to be consistent with the
Master Plan, staff can evaluate possible time frames
for implementation using the Phasing and Sequencing
Criteria Scorecard.
Tool: Sequencing Criteria
Not all projects can happen at once. Some projects are
more urgent or timely and should be implemented in
the short term, while other projects will require more
time to align funding or resources. The sequencing
criteria use a scoring system to help guide the phasing
of capital projects immediately (1-2 years) into the
short term (2-7 years), and long term (8+ years).
The Sequencing Criteria are expressed as a series of
questions around specific implementation topics, each
of which is scored. Among the topics are:
113
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | CHAPTER FIVE
• Does the project address any identified system
needs?
• Does the project diversify recreation opportunities
for people of different ethnicities and/or cultures?
• Does the project coincide with or support another
City project, goal or City Council initiative?
• Does action need to be taken now before the
opportunity is lost? Is project completion needed
before another priority project can be started?
• Are staff and resources available to operate and
maintain the site/facility?
• Is funding available for the project in the proposed
time frame?
• Does the project leverage outside resources?
• Can the project be done quickly and easily? Have the
necessary advanced planning, feasibility studies and
permitting already been completed?
• Is there public support for the project?
• Does the project deliver high value for the cost or
resources needed relative to other projects?
The Sequencing Criteria and Evaluation Scorecard in
Appendix G contains the complete list of criteria and
is a tool to help in the evaluation and decision-making
process.
moving forward
Cupertino residents came forward to share their
appreciation for their parks and recreation system
and to dream about its possibilities. This Master
Plan captures the community’s vision and articulates
how to enhance the parks, facilities and recreation
opportunities. By moving forward with the Early
Action Initiatives, the City is already demonstrating its
responsiveness to community priorities and its intent to
implement this Master Plan. This includes taking steps
to provide a greater diversity and variety of recreation
opportunities, an emphasis or integration of natural
systems and habitat, more comfortable and welcoming
amenities, improved connectivity, and a distinctly
Cupertino identity and sense of place.
Moving forward, continued community input will be
invited regularly. Opportunities will be shared with
community members and the Parks and Recreation
Commission as part of a process to implement projects
defined in this Master Plan, including a focus on
allowing partnerships or use of existing facilities.
Emphasis will be placed on meeting the City’s needs
to provide high-quality recreation facilities in all
parts of the City, exceptional programs in a cost-
effective and sustainable manner, and protection of
our natural environment. The elements of this plan
will be implemented via a Parks and Recreation
Strategic Plan which will map out actions for the next
3 years, by selecting projects to fund in the annual
Capital Improvement Program and by implementing
a design process for each capital project. Each of these
will include public input opportunities; each will be
strengthened and improved by active feedback from our
community.
This Master Plan is the first step of many more to come.
Continued public engagement is vital to creating this
plan’s vision for an outstanding parks and recreation
system for Cupertino.
IMPLEMENTATION | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
10300 Torre Ave.
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3200
cupertino.org
APPENDICES
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX A
3
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCESPARK & FACILITY INVENTORY
A
4
PARK & FACILITY INVENTORY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX A
A-1A-1
The City of Cupertino manages a variety of
parks ranging from smaller neighborhood parks
to large parks that attract people from across
the community. The City currently manages 33
sites, that are categorized in six different park
classifications. In addition, other providers
add parks, recreation facilities and open space
areas that provide publicly-accessible recreation
opportunities in Cupertino. This appendix
introduces this classification system, along with
the park and recreation facility inventory of sites
relevant to the planning process.
city parks by classification
Parks are classified as follows:
• Community Park: Community parks are
larger parks (20+ acres) that provide unique
recreation opportunities and serve the entire
community. These parks consist of a single
contiguous site or several functionally- and
geographically-linked use areas that provide
a variety of recreation facilities. They typically
include specialized facilities and space for
large group gatherings, programming and
events.
• Large Neighborhood Park: Large
neighborhood parks, varying between 4
acres and 13 acres in size, provide a range of
passive and active recreation opportunities for
surrounding neighborhoods. They typically
include play areas, picnic areas, open lawn
areas, and sports courts. Several also include
programmable and reservable facilities, such
as sports fields and small recreation centers.
• Small Neighborhood Park: Small
neighborhood parks provide essential
recreation opportunities for nearby neighbors.
Typically less than 3 acres in size, these parks
may include play areas, open lawns, and
picnic tables/benches. Some include sports
courts.
• Special Use Site: Special use sites support
a unique recreation opportunity serving all
or most of the Cupertino community. These
single-purpose sites may include specialized
recreation facilities not found elsewhere in the
park system. Urban plazas, civic space, dog
parks and sports complexes (without other
uses) are considered special use sites.
PARK & FACILITY INVENTORY
A
A-2A-2
PARK & FACILITY INVENTORY | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
• Trail Corridors: Trail corridors include
trails and associated greenways that link
destinations in the community. These typically
are single-purpose linear features not located
within parks of other types. These trails may
extend beyond Cupertino and connect to
surrounding cities and regional trail systems.
• School Sports Fields: This category includes
sports fields at nine school sites managed
through a joint use agreement. These sports
fields provide additional recreational
opportunities to the community when not in
use by the schools.
other recreation resources
in cupertino
Other providers offer the following:
• Local Parks and Recreation Resources: Local
park resources include public and private
sites that are open to the public and provide
recreation opportunities and/or open space
for residents.
• Santa Clara County Parks and Midpeninsula
Regional Open Space Preserves: County
parks and open space preserves protect nature
and attract park visitors from throughout the
region.
AcreageBaseball/Softball FieldBasketball HoopCricket FieldSoccer FieldTennis CourtVolleyball CourtAmphitheaterCommunity GardenHorseshoe PitOpen Field/Lawn AreaPicnic AreaPlaygroundSwimming PoolWater PlayRecreation BuildingOther BuildingFood Prep/KitchenRestaurant/Food Serv.Natural AreaTrailBBQ GrillsConcessionsRestroomWiFiAdjacent to SchoolRentable FacilityReservable PicnicNotes
Memorial Park 22.1 •L •L ••••••••6 tennis courts, 1 softball field, water features (inactive), community festival site. Acreage includes 0.4 acre parcel at Senior
Center entry.
Quinlan Community Center •²•••••
Senior Center •••••
Stevens Creek Corridor Park (SCCP)Total acreage of site is about 63.7 acres
Blackberry Farm Golf Course 16.4 •••••Municipal 9-hole golf course, restaurant, pro shop
Blackberry Farm Park 19.7 •••••••³••⁴••••••2 sand volleyball courts, 2 bocce courts, 2 pools, 2 horseshoe pits. Acreage includes west creek bank at Scenic Circle
McClellan Ranch Preserve 13.0 •••••••Environmental Education Center, historic buildings, 4-H, Audubon & nonprofits, wifi at EEC and vicinity
McClellan Ranch West 3.1 •
Stocklmeir Ranch 5.1 •••Residence (closed), orange grove
Other property in SCCP 6.4 •••1.3 acres of City land including 22050 Stevens Creek Blvd. and Nathan Hall Tank House. 5.1 acres of Water District land
(roughly half is trail property with use agreement; roughly half is creek channel managed by Water District)
Community Parks Subtotal 85.8 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 Note: SCCP and Memorial Park count as one site each.
Creekside Park 13.0 •••••••••••3 soccer fields, 2 basketball hoops, backstop, Weekly Farmers' Market, inactive concession
Hoover Park 5.0 •••••2 Soccer Fields, 1 basketball hoop
Jollyman Park 11.2 ••••••••1 baseball/soccer joint use field, 1 soccer field, batting cage, 1 basketball hoop
Linda Vista Park 11.0 •••••••Water feature (inactive); par/exercise course
Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center 6.2 ••••••••2 softball fields, 2 tennis courts, batting cage, separate preschool and program buildings
3.8 •••••₁••••
Varian Park 6.3 ••••••2 tennis courts, apricot orchard, adjacent YMCA program building
Wilson Park 9.9 •••••••₁••••⁵Ceramic studio, 2 baseball fields, 1 soccer/baseball joint use field, batting cage
Large Neighborhood Parks Subtotal 66.4 3 3 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 4 0 3 0 1 0 7 2 6 0 2 2 2
Canyon Oak Park 0.6 •
Franco Park 0.6 ••
Little Rancho Park 0.3 •
Somerset Park 1.7 •••••1 basketball hoop. Adjacent to freeway and railroad. PG&E land adds ~0.4 acres of the total.
Sterling Barnhart Park 0.5 ••Adjacent to Saratoga Creek Trail and creek
Three Oaks Park 3.1 ••••
Small Neighborhood Parks Subtotal 6.8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Civic Center
Civic Center Plaza 1.0 •0⁶••
Community Hall •••••
Library Field 3.0 •••1 multi use field for youth cricket, soccer, volleyball (all on 1 field)
Mary Avenue Dog Park 0.5
Cupertino Sports Center 6.2 ••L •••••Fitness Center, Teen Center, indoor gym & racquetball, 18 tennis courts, 1 multi-purpose court that includes basketball
Special Use Parks Subtotal 10.7 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 2 0
Amenities
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
COMMUNITY PARKS
Athletic Facilities
Portal Park
SPECIAL USE SITES
Site
City & City-Managed Parks and Facilities
Revised 9/27/19 Outdoor Recreation Facilities Other
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Table A-1: Cupertino Park & Facility Inventory Matrix
Indoor Facilities
Trails/
Natural
Areas
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
AcreageBaseball/Softball FieldBasketball HoopCricket FieldSoccer FieldTennis CourtVolleyball CourtAmphitheaterCommunity GardenHorseshoe PitOpen Field/Lawn AreaPicnic AreaPlaygroundSwimming PoolWater PlayRecreation BuildingOther BuildingFood Prep/KitchenRestaurant/Food Serv.Natural AreaTrailBBQ GrillsConcessionsRestroomWiFiAdjacent to SchoolRentable FacilityReservable PicnicNotes
AmenitiesAthletic Facilities
Site
Revised 9/27/19 Outdoor Recreation Facilities OtherIndoor Facilities
Trails/
Natural
Areas
4.0 •Trail is ~ 0.4 miles; is the Mary Avenue to Homestead Road trail
Creekside Park and Regnart Creek Trail 0.1 •Water District parcel located on west side of Creekside Park provides a 1-block public trail on 0.4 acres creek property; joint use
agreement covers 0.1 acre trail.
Saratoga Creek Trail 4.7 •• Approx 0.45 miles maintained by City via joint use agreement; owned by County (~3.3 acres) and SCVWD (~1.4 acres). Trail
extends south of Bollinger in San Jose.
Stevens Creek Trail -••Trail is ~ 1 mile. Restrooms at Blackberry Farm Park & McClellan Ranch. Acreage is included in SCC.
Trail Corridors Subtotal 8.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Collins Elementary School 2.5 •1 baseball field, cricket batting cages not managed by City
Eaton Elementary School 4.5 ••1 soccer/baseball joint use field
Faria Elementary School 4.2 ••1 baseball diamond adjoining 1 soccer field
Garden Gate Elementary School 2.9 •1 soccer field
Hyde Middle School 7.8 ••1 soccer field, 1 baseball/soccer joint use field, track not managed by city
Kennedy Middle School 13.3 •••1 baseball field, 1 soccer field, 2 baseball/soccer joint use fields, track not managed by City
Lincoln Elementary School 3.1 ••2 softball/soccer joint use fields
Regnart Elementary School 4.1 ••2 baseball/soccer joint use fields
Stevens Creek Elementary School 3.1 ••2 softball diamonds adjoining 1 soccer field
School Fields Subtotal 45.5 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Total City Parks and Facilities 224.0 12 5 1 12 4 2 1 1 1 13 14 16 1 2 7 2 6 2 4 5 11 5 12 4 2 5 4
Cali Mill Plaza Park 1.0 0⁶•Use agreement in place
Civic Park [at Town Center Lane]0.5 •0⁶Private ownership; open to public
1.1 ••Private ownership; open to public; pool is private use only and is not included in acreage subtotal
Main Street Park 0.8 •••0⁶2 chess/checker tables; nature play elements; use agreement in place; private ownership
Rancho Rinconada 1.5 •••••••Recreation & Park District; public facilities
SCVWD Percolation Pond 5.0 ••Walking path around percolation pond; Water District ownership; open to public
Town Square [at Main Street]0.7 •Use agreement in place; private ownership. (Size includes buildings; net avail. space is smaller.)
Subtotal Local Parks & Resources 10.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
Fremont Older Open Space Preserve*~739 •••Extensive trails; approximately 739 acres for total site, including acreage outside of city; 204 acres within City.
Rancho San Antonio County Park & Preserve*~4,153 •••••••Extensive trails, Deer Hollow Farm, 4 tennis courts, model airplane flying area; approximately 4,153 acres for total site,
including acreage outside of city, approximately 130 acres within City.
Stevens Creek County Park*~1,070 ••••••Extensive trails, boating access to reservoir (non-motorized), archery course & range; approximately 1,070 acres for total site,
including acreage outside of city, approximately 79 acres within City.
Subtotal County Parks & Regional Preserves ~5962 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 1
Total Other Recreation Resources ~5,972.6 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 4 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 4 4 3 0 4 1 0 1 1
L - Lighted court 2 - Playground at Quinlan Center for preschool program; other playgrounds available in adjacent Memorial Park 4 - Food service for outdoor dining available during swim season
1 - Building has a kitchenette 3 - Seasonal creek access 5 - Ceramic party rentals available 6 - Restaurant or café adjacent to site
* Only includes acreage within City limits
LOCAL PARKS & RECREATION RESOURCES
Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge & Trail
Cupertino City Center Park (and
amphitheater)
COUNTY PARKS & REGIONAL OPEN SPACE
PRESERVES
Other Recreation Resources
TRAIL CORRIDORS
SCHOOL FIELDS (managed by City)
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Table A-2: Major Recreation Buildings/ Facilities That Are Programmed by Parks & Recreation
May 2019
Facility
Name & Address Key Uses/ Functions
Size in SF
(rounded)Year Built Notes
Quinlan Commty. Center
10185 N. Stelling Rd.
City's primary & largest venue for
indoor recreation activities,
events & gatherings
28,700 1990
Quinlan Community Center provides multiple classrooms/activity rooms (for dance, music, crafts, fitness, preschool and more), meeting space, multi-
purpose community rooms, a large lobby, and a commercial-style kitchen. Quinlan hosts larger community-oriented activities and rentals. It plays a
key role in some of the city's major festivals. The Cupertino Historical Society's museum is housed here, as are Recreation staff. The interior was
updated in 2015. The adjacent rear plaza was renovated in 2010.
Sports Center
21111 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Athletics, fitness, sport courts,
tennis hub. Membership based.16,750 1977
An extensive building remodel occurred 2003. A minor remodel of raquetball courts occurred in 1996. Planned improvements include seismic
upgrades. Proposed improvements include upgrades to locker rooms, upstairs restrooms, and the front desk/lobby area. The building hosts fitness,
gym, raquetball courts, classes, child care, and a Teen Center that opened in 2004. Teen Center space (approx. 1,700 sf) was refreshed in early
2019. Drop-in visitors are welcome and pay a drop-in fee. Exterior grounds offer 18 lighted tennis courts & 1 multi-purpose court.
Senior Center
21251 Stevens Creek Blvd.Activities for seniors 50+15,500 2000
The Senior Center was built in 2000 (replacing an older building dating to 1978). A wide range of senior activities are offered including fitness,
education, recreation, enrichment, case management, wellness, and socializing. In addition to program space, the building offers a lobby area,
reading room with fireplace, a large multi-use reception hall and commercial-style kitchen, and generous outdoor deck and patio areas.
Blacksmith Shop
22221 McClellan Rd.
Blacksmith displays, historical &
educational focus 600 2015 renovation
The Blacksmith Shop was renovated in 2015 to meet current safety standards and placed on a new foundation. The original walls remain and are
visible on the interior. The building was Charley Baer's 1950's replica of his father's earlier blacksmith shop. Visitors enjoy its displays of historic
blacksmithing tools and farm implements. The forge is being restored, and blacksmithing demonstrations and classes are planned.
Environmental Education
Center
22221 McClellan Rd.
Environmental and outdoor
education hub 2,500 2015
The Environmental Education Center at McClellan Ranch Preserve is a state-of-the-art building consistent with LEED silver standards. It sports solar
panels, rainwater harvesting, bird-safe design, and other environmentally-friendly features. The "EEC" hosts a wide variety of environmental
activities for all ages year round.
Community Hall
10350 Torre Ave.
Public meetings, large group
gatherings, Library programs
6,000 2004 The Community Hall is designed to host public meetings and civic functions, and is heavily used for those. It is currently frequently used for Library
programs. It also hosts numerous trainings, functions and gatherings.
Creekside Park Building
10455 Miller Ave.
Multi-purpose recreation and
community space
1,800 1996 This building provides a community room with a kitchenette that hosts classes and can be rented, as well as restrooms, storage and a currently
inactive concession area. Restrooms were updated in 2018.
Monta Vista Park & Recreation
Center Buildings
22601 Voss Ave.
Preschool and youth offerings 12,000 1967 This former school site provides two program buildings including a preschool building of ~2,600 sf, and a multi-use building that has hosted
gymnastics and martial arts at ~9,400 sf. Other classes focusing on youth including fitness, crafts, cooking, reading and science, as well as storage
for recreation, occur here. The multi-use building was built in 1967; the preschool building predates it.
Portal Park Building
19810 Portal Rd.
Parent-child programs 1,550 1967 Portal Park and its building were designed in 1967. The building provides a multi-purpose recreation activity space with a kitchen, as well as
detached restrooms (an additional 300 sf). Parent-child programs, including a preschool, are offered here.
Wilson Park Building
19784 Wintergreen Dr.
Ceramics hub - studio &
instruction
1,400 Pre 1975 The Wilson Park recreation building serves as the city's ceramics center. It also contains a kitchen, and a separate sports storage area. The kitchen,
plumbing and water service were updated in 2018. An adjacent restroom building (300 sf) was replaced in 2003.
AT McCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE
AT CITY PARKS & CIVIC SITES
ADJOINING MEMORIAL PARK
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW
B
A-6
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW |cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX B
B-1
introduction
The City’s Parks and Recreation Department
(the Department) offers a variety of community
events, recreation and education programs,
facilities and services that promote personal
development, community cohesion, health and
fitness, and connections to nature among other
benefits. As part of the Master Plan process,
the Department’s existing recreation programs,
events and services were evaluated to better
understand the types of programs and services
provided, as well as opportunities to enhance
park activation and programming in the future.
The analysis identified the core areas where
programs were offered, as well as the ancillary
services needed to support the effective and
efficient provision of programs, events and
recreation uses.
This appendix provides a summary of the core
program and service areas identified, as well as a
baseline evaluation of community participation
in City programs and facilities. This appendix
draws information from the Recreation Programs
Overview and Analysis (November 2017)
available under separate cover.
service areas
The City of Cupertino provides a wide variety
of programs and services to support recreation.
For analysis, discussion and future data tracking,
the Master Plan classified services in two distinct
categories:
• Program Service Areas reflects the different
types of core recreation programs, camps,
classes, activities and events produced,
hosted, staffed and/or facilitated by the City.
• Support Service Areas include administrative
and customer-focused efforts necessary to
support recreation and facilitate recreation
participation.
Program Service Areas
The Department offers a variety of programs
across nine service areas. The programs provide
recreational and educational opportunities for
a diversity of ages and interests. Service areas
include:
• Arts & Culture: Includes classes, camps,
programs, and activities relating to fine,
visual, performing and cultural arts.
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW
B
B-2
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
• Aquatics: Includes all aquatics and swimming
programs and services.
• Child, Youth and Teen Development
& Leadership: Includes programs from
preschool through college preparation
that focus on child and youth learning and
development, afterschool enrichment, and
youth and teen empowerment.
• Events and Festivals: Includes all events,
fairs, festivals, races and community-
scale activities produced by the City, in
collaboration with the City or at City facilities.
• Golf: Includes all golf participation and golf-
related programs and services.
• Environmental Education/Nature Programs:
Includes opportunities to learn about,
appreciate, restore, interpret and interact with
the natural environment through classes,
camps, volunteer opportunities, etc.
• Lifelong Learning & Enrichment: Includes
opportunities for skill development and
personal enrichment for recreation and leisure
in a non-academic context.
• Seniors/Older Adult Programs: Includes all
programs, activities and services designed
and offered exclusively for seniors and older
adults, whether at the Senior Center or other
facilities.
• Sports, Fitness and Exercise: Includes
organized athletic leagues, sport-focused
camps, sports or fitness classes, and open
gyms/facilities/courts, except those relating
to golf, aquatics or seniors.
Table B-1 further defines these categories by
providing examples of existing programs
and noting where activities and programs are
currently provided at sites across the park
system. Several findings emerge:
• City programs are offered primarily in the
City’s Community and Large Neighborhood
parks. Programs have not been provided
in the past in Small Neighborhood Parks,
County Parks and Regional Open Spaces.
There is an opportunity to expand the
provision and distribution of programs to
make them more easily access to residents
across the city.
• Through joint-use agreements and other
collaborative initiatives, the City has pursued
providing programs in local parks owned
or managed by other providers. This is an
interesting opportunity to explore further.
• In addition to the City’s existing program
services areas, there are opportunities to
expand programs in the following areas:
◊ Culturally Diverse Programming: The
City could expand programs responding to
the community’s racial, ethnic and cultural
demographics, including special interests
as well as service and language needs.
◊ Play and Outdoor Recreation: There is
an opportunity to provide less structured
but organized play opportunities at
indoor and outdoor facilities, as well as
outdoor programming and activation in
parks and related public spaces. These
types of activities would be suitable in
neighborhood and community parks
and could help create more vibrant park
spaces.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX B
B-3
◊ Therapeutic Recreation: The City could
expand classes, activities and events
specifically for people with disabilities,
health challenges, varied abilities or special
needs. These programs could be offered to
augment and expand senior programs and
services, as well as to support people of
all ages. Currently the City accommodates
people with special needs within their
existing program structure.
9 INDOOR FACILITIES:
• Portal Park Building
• Creekside Park Building
• Wilson Park Ceramic Center
• Environmental Education
Center (McClellan Ranch
Preserve)
• Monta Vista Recreation
Center
• Quinlan Community Center
• Senior Center
• Sports Center
• Community Hall
15 SPORTS FIELD SITES:
• Creekside Park
• Hoover Park
• Jollyman Park
• Memorial Park
• Monta Vista Park
• Wilson Park and nine
schools
4 PRIMARY OUTDOOR
EVENT VENUES:
• Memorial Park
• Civic Center Plaza
• Stevens Creek
Corridor Park
• Creekside Park
FIGURE B-1: SITES WHERE PROGRAMS ARE CURRENTLY OFFERED
B-4
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Program Service Area Examples of Existing Programs
and Events
Locations Where
Currently Offered
Arts & Culture
Includes classes, camps,
programs, etc. relating to fine,
visual and performing and
cultural arts
• Dance, Act Perform Camp
• Hogwarts Camp
• Bilingual Chinese & English Music
Class
• Group Ukulele Beginners
• IncrediBooks
• Ceramic and Art Birthday Part
»Community Parks
»Large Neighborhood Parks
Aquatics
Includes all aquatics
programs, events and services
• Drop-in swimming
• Picnic reservations with swimming
• Pool parties
• Swimming lessons
• Lifeguard training
»Community Parks
»School Fields/ School Sites
Child, Youth and Teen
Development & Leadership
Includes programs from
preschool through college
preparation that focus on
child and youth learning and
development, afterschool
enrichment, and youth and
teen empowerment
• Civically Active Teens
• Preschool Adventures Summer
Camp
• Cupertino Preschool Program
• Cupertino Teen Commission
• Debate & Critical Thinking: Team
Debate
• College Preparation Program
• Leaders in Training
»Community Parks
»Large Neighborhood Parks
Events and Festivals
Includes all events, fairs,
festivals, races and
community-scale activities
produced by the City, in
collaboration with the City or
at City facilities
• Big Bunny Fun Run
• Earth Day/Healthy Communities
Day
• Fourth of July
• Concerts in the Park
• Shakespeare in the Park
• Kids ‘N Fun
• Diwali Festival
• Wafu Ikebana Flower Show
• Harvest Festival
• Farmers Market
• Cherry Blossom Festival
»Community Parks
»Special Use Sites
»Large Neighborhood Parks
Golf
Includes all golf and golf-
related programs and services
• Blackberry Farm Golf Course (golf
and footgolf)
• Jr. Golf at Deep Cliff Golf Course
• Golf for Women
»Community Parks
»Local Parks and Recreation
Resources
Environmental Education/
Nature Programs
Includes opportunities to
learn about, restore, interpret
and interact with the natural
environment through
classes, camps, volunteer
opportunities, etc.
• Nature Camps
• Eco-explorers Camps
• Tuesday Evening Nature
• Meadow Restoration
»Community Parks
»Trail Corridors
TABLE B-1: EXISTING PROGRAM SERVICE AREAS OVERVIEW
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX B
B-5
Program Service Area Examples of Existing Programs
and Events
Locations Where
Currently Offered
Lifelong Learning & Enrichment
Includes opportunities for skill
development and personal
enrichment for recreation and
leisure in a non-academic
context
• Chess
• Best of California
• Leadership 95014
• Bakery Favorites
• Electronics Design Camp
• Cooking
• Bilingual Chinese
• Creative writing
»Community Parks
»Large Neighborhood Parks
»Special Use Sites
Seniors/Older Adult Programs
Includes all programs,
activities and services
designed and offered
exclusively for seniors and
older adults, whether at the
Senior Center or other facilities
• Summer Luau and June Birthday
Bash
• Ping Pong Social
• Ballroom Dance Social
• iPad Beginning
• Chinese Brush Painting
• Zumba Gold
»Community Parks
Sports, Fitness and Exercise
Includes all organized athletic
leagues, camps, sports or
fitness classes, and open
gyms/facilities/courts, except
those relating to golf, aquatics
or seniors
• Badminton Camps
• Ice Skating for Kids
• Family Total Body Fitness
• Vinyasa Yoga
• Private & Group Tennis Instruction
• Cricket Camp
»Community Parks
»Large Neighborhood Parks
»Special Use Sites
»School Fields/ School Sites
»Local Parks and Recreation
Resources
B-6
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Support Service Areas
Support services are necessary to offering
successful recreation and education programs.
The City provides the following services to
support park and facility use and program
participation:
• Adaptive/Inclusive Recreation
Accommodations: Includes outreach and
support to accommodate requests to make
events and activities accessible for people of
all abilities.
• Communication, Branding and Marketing:
Includes the Department’s efforts to advertise
its programs and communicate effectively
about recreation options.
• Customer Service: Includes elements such as
registration and connections to social services.
• Park and Facility Reservations, Rentals and
Permits: Administers applications, permitting
and scheduling for park and facility rentals
and reservations (e.g., meeting rooms, picnic
spaces, community garden plots, sports
fields, and recreation facilities for use by
other leagues, clubs, groups, organizations or
individuals).
• Park and Facility Maintenance: Includes
landscaping and infrastructure maintenance,
janitorial services, equipment repair, natural
resource stewardship and similar services to
ensure the cleanliness, safety and usability
of parks. These services are provided by the
public works department.
• Partnership and Volunteer Coordination:
Includes the recruitment and management of
partnership and volunteer opportunities.
• Program Management: Includes program
administration and planning, such as
decision-making, cost recovery, fee
methodology, development, staffing, staff
policies and procedures, staff management
and training.
Prior to the Master Plan, the
City of Cupertino tracked
program data in the following
categories:
• Rentals
• Events
• Athletic groups
• Sports Center
• Golf Course
• After-school enrichment
• Camps
• Youth classes & programs
• Teen classes & programs
• Adult classes & programs
• Senior Center
• McClellan Ranch Preserve/
nature programs
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX B
B-7
program participation
To better understand the breadth and depth of
the City’s existing programs and services, the
Master Plan evaluated recreation participation
by compiling all existing program data from 2016
through September 2017. At that time, the City
tracked programs and services using in different
categories using different methodologies. Data
were not available for all types of programs and
services.
Table B-2 summarizes tracked program
participation in the one-year 2016- to 2017-
time frame. While the participation numbers
presented here are incomplete, the evaluation
helps illustrate what services and programs are
currently provided, where program enhancement
is needed to better address the recreation
preferences and needs of City residents, and
what processes should be recommended to
support service provision.
The City of Cupertino served more than 347,000
annual estimated participants based on data
through September 2017. Table B-2 summarizes
available City data on recreation program
participants. The data highlight interesting
patterns in current programming participation
noted below. However, the numbers should be
viewed with care since the categories represent
different types and durations of participation,
and compare “apples to oranges.” In particular,
participants in registered classes that occur over
weeks or months are ‘undercounted’ as described
in the fourth bullet below.:
• Pool/Other Facility Reserved or Drop-in
Uses (Providing Places to Gather, Picnic and
Play): While the City provides a variety of
programs and events, it serves a high number
of people through its facility reservations,
rentals and reservations and drop-in
swimming. The City reports over 2,100
rentals/ reservations serving an estimated
155,800 people and over 21,000 pool users
at Blackberry Farm in the 12-month period.
Rental opportunities include indoor meeting
rooms and spaces such as at the Quinlan
Community Center, Monta Vista Recreation
Center and Creekside Park Building. It
includes outdoors venues such as picnic
areas. The majority of rental use occurred
at two sites, Community Hall and Quinlan
Community Center, which accounted for over
1,000 rentals or reservations and over 87,000
estimated users. Pool use includes drop-in
visitors and pool parties at Blackberry Farm
(but not class participants for swimming
or aquatics, which are shown with Classes
data). These data do not include sports field
reservations and use by leagues, which
accounts for another over 5,000 participants.
These numbers also do not include parks
reserved through permitting for special
events, which are described below.
• Special Events (Connecting the Community):
Special events and festivals also attract large
numbers of participants. Most of these events
are hosted by other entities in City parks
and facilities, although some events are
coordinated or sponsored by the City. These
include the popular outdoor concerts, movies
and Shakespeare in the Park, as well as fun
runs, community events and celebrations
such as the Holiday Tree Lighting program,
4th of July, and the Wildlife & Harvest Day
celebration. Of the estimated approximately
B-8
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
60,000 people participating in events, about
40,000 attended events at Memorial Park. That
site is critical to hosting large community-
wide events in Cupertino.
• Sports Center and Golf Course Rounds
(Fostering Active, Healthy Individuals):
The Sports Center and Golf Course are also
top service areas in terms of numbers of
people served. With over 34,000 sports center
member visits for fitness classes alone and
over 25,500 golf rounds, the City devotes
substantial resources towards meeting sport
and fitness needs. These numbers do not
include people participating in registered
classes at the Sports Center, which are
included in Classes data and categorized by
age group, nor does it include court usage by
members, clubs or leagues.
• Recreation & Enrichment Classes and
Programs (Enriching Lives through
Recreation and Education): Other types of
age-specific programs and staff-led activities
account for an important component of
the City’s program and recreation services.
These categories include all other types of
programs, including areas of emphasis such
as education, enrichment, environmental
education, nature interpretation, youth and
teen development and empowerment, senior
services, and programs for diverse cultures.
However, it is important to note that classes,
camps, and other “registered” activities are
counted by quantity of registrations. For
example, a participant that signs up for an 8-
or 12-week registered fitness class at Quinlan
Center or the Senior Center will count as
“1.” A Sports Center member that attended 8
different Zumba classes for members counts
as 8 in the data provided. This methodology
under-represents registered activities and
classes, relative to picnic reservations, golf,
drop-in swimming, special events and other
activities where each “person-visit” is counted
individually.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX B
B-9
City-Identified
Service Area
Estimated
Participants Data Included
Rentals 155,800 Facility reservations and rentals
Drop-in Swimming 21,100 Swimming at Blackberry Farm, excl. season
passes
Events 59,700
Events hosted by the city or other groups
in city parks and facilities (including Senior
Center events)
Sports Center 36,200 Membership classes/activities at the Sports
Center (excludes registered classes)1
Sports Center membership
Total number of memberships for the year was
1,980. Sports Center Tennis Club membership
was 380.
Golf Course 25,600 Rounds of golf or foot golf
Youth Classes/Programs 10,200 Registered classes of all types, including
aquatics and sports
Teen Classes/Programs 7,100 Registered and drop-in teen activities of all
types
Adult Classes/Programs 2,000 Registered classes of all types, excluding
senior classes
Senior Center 5,800 Senior Center classes, drop-in classes, and
field trips2
Senior Center Volunteers 200 208 volunteers provided more than 25,000
hours of service
Athletic Groups 5,100 Participants in sports leagues that use city
fields or joint use fields (88% youth sport teams)
Youth Camps 5,000 Youth camps of all types, including sports, arts,
nature, etc. Also includes Extended Care.
McClellan Ranch Preserve 13,700 Activities at McClellan Ranch or led by
McClellan Staff excluding classes & camps3
TOTALS 347,500
TABLE B-2: PARTICIPATION IN CITY PROGRAMS
(ROUNDED TO NEAREST 100)
Note: These estimates are derived from data from January 2016 through September 2017 and represents the 12 months that provided the most current complete information. Data counts represent a mix of visits, registered participants, facility users, estimated use, and other counts.
1 Data for similar activities or the same location may be presented in more than one category, due to how participation
is tracked. For example, “Sports Center” figures include member classes held at the Sports Center, but not registered
classes held there, such as tennis lessons, which are shown in the appropriate Classes & Programs category instead.
2 Data not available for usage resulting from Senior Center drop-in participants.
3 Excludes activity by nonprofits housed at McClellan Ranch Preserve such as Rolling Hills 4-H and Santa Clara Valley
Audubon Society.
B-10
RECREATION PROGRAMS OVERVIEW | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCESCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY
C
B-12
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY | cupertino parks and recreation system master
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX C
C-1
introduction
From Spring 2016 through 2018, the City of
Cupertino collected comments from community
members and stakeholders to shape the Parks
and Recreation System Master Plan. This
appendix provides details on the advisory
groups involved in the Master Plan process, as
well as the types of outreach activities conducted.
key groups
participation
Four groups provided ongoing guidance for the
Master Plan:
• City Council: City Council received periodic
project updates and provided policy-level
guidance on several key elements of the
Master Plan, including plan goals, system-
wide and specific recommendations, project
priorities, and implementation strategies.
• The Parks and Recreation Commission
(PRC): The PRC met 18 times to provide
guidance and serve as a forum for public
input throughout the process, including two
special Commission meetings that hosted
community workshops. The PRC received
regular project updates and presentations
of key findings throughout all phases of the
Master Plan development. The PRC was
actively involved in the planning process and
provided guidance on all aspects of the plan,
including preliminary research, parks and
facilities inventory, community engagement
results, recreation programs analysis, vision/
mission/goals of the plan, community needs
and opportunities, potential “big moves”
and major facility recommendations, site-
specific recommendations, project priorities
and prioritization criteria, Memorial Park
concepts, costs/funding, and the elements of
the Draft Plan.
• Master Plan Advisory Group: The Master
Plan Advisory Group was created to
advise the Project Team throughout plan
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY
C
C-2
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY | cupertino parks and recreation system master
development and help ensure the Master Plan
reflected the diverse needs of the community.
Members from 18 groups representing
different recreation and community interests
were involved to provide guidance, insight
and expertise about the local community. The
insights of the Master Plan Advisory Group
were shared with the Parks and Recreation
Commission to support project decision-
making. The Master Plan Advisory Group
convened seven times between September
2017 and January 2019.
• Parks and Recreation Management Team
(Project Team): The Project Team was
responsible for coordinating and directing
the planning process, communication and
coordination with City Council, the Parks and
Recreation Commission and the Master Plan
Advisory Group. Throughout the process,
the Project Team reviewed key deliverables,
coordinated public outreach activities, and
provided updates about the development of
the Master Plan to City Council, the PRC and
the Master Plan Advisory Group.
community engagement
process
To ensure that the Master Plan reflects the
priorities of a diverse community, the City of
Cupertino collected input from an estimated
more than 2,000 residents and stakeholders
through varied outreach activities:
• Citywide Survey: From March 24th to July
19th, 2016, the City of Cupertino implemented
a survey to collect community input on
the state of the City’s parks and recreation
system and potential improvements and
alterations to the system in the future. The
27-question survey, available online and in
paper, collected input from a total of 679
respondents.
• Intercept Events: Between March and July
2016, the Master Plan was spotlighted at four
“intercept” events at Cupertino’s Big Bunny
Fun Run, the Earth Day & Arbor Day Festival,
Cupertino Day and 4th of July Festival
to raise awareness about the Master Plan
process. Hundreds of community members
placed stickers on display boards to “vote” for
desired recreation amenities, programs and
facilities.
• Teen Commission’s Teen Center Survey:
To evaluate preferences for relocating and
improving the Teen Center, a Teen Center
Survey was created and distributed by the
Cupertino Teen Commission from November
9, 2015, to January 8th, 2016, to teens
attending Cupertino middle and high schools.
Over 1,000 teens responded. (These responses
are not included in the tally of about 2,000
Master Plan participants.)
• Stakeholder Interviews: The City and
consultant RHAA met with stakeholder
groups to identify issues and ideas unique
to Cupertino. Twenty-four organizations
(34 people) participated, representing the
following areas of interest: environmental
groups, organized sports teams, non-City
parks and recreation providers, public safety
organizations, community service groups,
Cupertino’s business community, including
Cupertino hotels, and schools that offer joint
use of facilities with the City.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX C
C-3
• Public Community Workshop: In May 2016,
the Parks and Recreation Commission hosted
a public community workshop to continue
to receive feedback and suggestions for the
improvement of the City’s existing parks,
recreation facilities, and programming.
• Block Leader Workshop: In June 2016, the
City and RHAA conducted a workshop
with approximately 25 block leaders to
collect information on the current and future
park and recreation system. Block leaders
are community members that serve as
representatives of their neighborhoods and
liaisons to City residents.
• Council and Community Leader Interviews:
As a follow-up to the other outreach activities,
the City and MIG, Inc., conducted eight
interviews with 11 Council members and
community leaders in April and May 2017 to
gain insights from elected officials and key
partners into planning opportunities and
challenges.
• Recreation Staff Focus Group: Recreation
program staff met on April 18, 2017, to discuss
desired community benefits provided through
recreation programs, events and drop-in
activities. The visioning session included
discussions about the service enhancements
needed to achieve the community’s desired
recreation outcomes for the future. Early
input by Recreation staff was provided in
December 2015 at a focused workshop.
• Vision and Goals Questionnaire: Building on
earlier outreach efforts, an online and paper
questionnaire was distributed between July
10 and August 9, 2017, to share key themes
identified from preliminary outreach activities
and invite feedback on the concepts related
to the Master Plan vision and goals. A total of
1,206 respondents participated in the survey.
• Parks and Recreation Commission/ Hosted
Community Workshop: On May 17, 2018,
the Parks and Recreation Commission
held a work session in combination
with a Community Workshop to discuss
enhancement priorities for the City’s
recreation facilities and receive community
feedback on these priorities. Approximately
30 community members attended the
workshop, which included a live polling
exercise to help identify priorities for facility
development and improvements and for
the addition of recreation features. Session
participants also provided feedback on
preliminary site concepts for the renovation of
Memorial Park.
• Draft Plan Review Meetings: A series of
meetings were held beginning in January 2019
to present and discuss the Draft Master Plan
and receive public feedback. Opportunities
for public input included a Community
workshop, Teen Commission-hosted
workshop, several City commission meetings
(such as the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission,
the Planning Commission and the Parks
and Recreation Commission), as well as City
Council reviews during several meetings.
C-4
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY | cupertino parks and recreation system master
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCESPARK ACCESS AND OPPORTUNITY MAPS
D
C-6
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY | cupertino parks and recreation system master
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX D
D-1C-D-1D-1
opportunity maps
This appendix contains maps that support the
goals, objectives and actions of the Master Plan.
The first map (Map D-1) illustrates opportunities
to foster natural systems in Cupertino. Map
D-2 illustrates enhanced pedestrian and
bicycle connectivity as identified in the City’s
2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan and the 2018
Pedestrian Transportation Plan.
park access maps
Maps D-3 and D-4 show the amount of accessible
park acreage within a 10-minute walk for
City residents. Initial versions of these maps
were presented to the Parks and Recreation
Commission (PRC) in August 2017. Revised
versions were presented to the PRC and the
City Council in September 2017. The maps were
further refined in response to input received at a
joint PRC and City Council meeting in February
2018.
Maps D-3 and D-4 support the implementation
of two City of Cupertino policies:
• Per Cupertino General Plan Policy RPC-2.4,
the City of Cupertino strives to ensure that all
residents have “access within a ½ mile walk
of a neighborhood park or a community park
with neighborhood facilities.”
• In October 2017, Cupertino’s Mayor joined
134 of the nation’s mayors in launching a
“10-minute walk” parks advocacy campaign
in conjunction with the National Recreation
and Park Association, Trust for Public Land,
and Urban Land Institute.
Both policies emphasize providing parks
within ½ mile (which is approximately a
10-minute walk). The 10-minute walk campaign
focuses on access to any park or green space,
while the City’s General Plan policy calls for
neighborhood-serving features or facilities. The
General Plan does not define what is meant
by “neighborhood park” and “neighborhood
facilities.”
PARK ACCESS & OPPORTUNITY MAPS
D
C-D-2D-2
PARK ACCESS & OPPORTUNITY MAPS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
C-D-2D-2
The Park Access maps use ArcGIS Network
Analyst Extension1 to illustrate areas within a ½
mile (10-minute walk) walking distance to parks.
The maps highlight unserved areas zoned for
residential uses. They divide residential uses into
three categories to reflect different population
densities:
• Single Family Residential (R1), Single Family
Residential Cluster (R1C), and Residential
Duplex (R2), which allows for residential uses
with densities up to 10 dwelling units per acre.
• Multiple Family Residential (R3) and Mixed
Use Planned Development (P), which allows
for residential uses with densities up to 20 or
more dwelling units per acre.
• Residential Hillside (RHS) and Agricultural
Hillside, where residential densities can range
from 0.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre.
Map D-3: Access to All Public Park Acreage within a 10-minute Walk
Map D-3 illustrates areas served with a ½-mile
of all publicly-accessible, designated parks,
open space and trails, including school sport
fields used as recreation space as per a joint use
agreement (JUA) between the City and Cupertino
Union School District. This includes City, County
and Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
1 ArcGIS Network Analyst provides network-based
spatial analysis tools. It uses a configurable transportation
network data model, allowing organizations to accurately
represent their unique network requirements (e.g.:
determining areas around the parks that fall within a
specified distance from the parks along the road network
rather than using a simple one-mile buffer around the parks
without taking the mode of travel into consideration).
parks and open space; sites owned by other
Districts such as Rancho Rinconada and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District percolation pond;
and privately-owned parks that provide public
access, such as Main Street Park, and Cali Mill
Plaza. Sites that count towards providing access
are named on the map and labeled. These sites are
within City limits or are operated by the City.
Map D-3 does not include privately-owned and
operated parks and recreation facilities, such
as Deep Cliff Golf Course, the YMCA, schools
without joint use agreements, or parks and
recreation resources outside the city limits.
This map illustrates where there are disparities in
the amount of park acreage available to residents.
The map is color-shaded to show the variation in
park acreage residents can access within a ½ mile
walk depending on where they live, ranging from
zero to 20+ acres of park land.
Because of overlapping service areas, some areas
have access to more acreage than indicated. The
purpose of the map is to highlight residents that
do not have access to at least 3 acres of park
land within ½ mile walk. Three acres is enough
space to provide a play area, open lawn, seating/
picnic areas, and one or more small sports
courts or other facilities to support traditional
neighborhood park uses.
Residential density is communicated in a
‘big picture’ manner by indicating the type
of residential zoning. Residential hillside and
agricultural residential zoning, which exists in
the west part of the city, is very low density, with
generally ~½ acre to 10 acres of land per dwelling
unit. This low-density zoning was excluded from
the color-coded park acreage mapping, except to
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX D
D-3C-D-3D-3
indicate on map D-3 where there is access to park
acreage in adjacent regional parks and preserves.
Mixed-use zoning that could allow residential is
included in the color-coded mapping. However,
commercial property that faces on the west side
of Wolfe Road from Highway 280 to Homestead
Road was excluded. These parcels comprise three
hotel sites and a shopping center and are deemed
unlikely to become residential. For the same
reason, commercial/office property in proximity to
De Anza Blvd. from Highway 280 to Alves Drive
was excluded from the analysis. This area contains
office and commercial uses, including Infinite
Loop, which are deemed unlikely to become
residential within the 20-year planning horizon of
this document.
Map D-4: Access to Neighborhood-Serving Park Acreage within a 10-minute Walk
This map is similar to map D-3 but focuses on
access to neighborhood-serving park acreage
that meet the six criteria listed below. This map
illustrates where there are disparities in the
amount of neighborhood-serving park acreage
available for residents. The low-density residential
and the commercial/office parcels excluded on
Map D-3 are also excluded on Map D-4.
Map D-4 focuses shows ½-mile access to all
neighborhood parks in the City designed to serve
surrounding residents with at least three recreation
uses.
For purposes of this map, qualifying
“neighborhood-serving” sites must be:
1) City-owned or designated for public access;
2) Neighborhood parks or other types of parks that meet neighborhood needs;
3) Open year-round and accessible during regular park hours;
4) Located in the City;
5) Not designed to provide County-wide or regional service; and
6) Able to provide a minimum of three unrestricted, self-directed recreation uses.
For this final criterion, “unrestricted” uses means
that no permit, reservation or membership is
required to participate. “Self-directed uses”
means that the facilities are available for drop-
in participation and do not require advance
scheduling nor staff leadership (as do events,
programs or classes). Examples of park elements
that support self-directed uses include seating,
playgrounds, looped walking paths, drop-in tennis
courts, drop-in basketball courts, picnicking,
turf areas for play, and similar amenities that
can be freely enjoyed and serve casual daily
neighborhood use.
Based on these criteria, this map excludes trail
corridors, County parks and regional open space,
private park and recreation facilities, and several
specialized or small City parks, such as the Mary
Avenue Dog Park and Little Rancho Park. It
also excludes schools with and without joint use
agreements, and parks and recreation resources
outside the city limits.
Note: Map D-4 also excludes the Rancho
Rinconada pool and recreation facility, which is
managed by its Park & Recreation District for local
use. Excluding Rancho Rinconada makes is easier
to see where District residents are served by City
parks as well as that site.
C-D-4D-4
PARK ACCESS & OPPORTUNITY MAPS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Park and Open Spaces
Natural Resource Areas
Open Space Preserves
City Parks
Base Map Features
Cupertino City Boundary
Railroad
Cupertino Sphere of Inuence *
Opportunities for Natural Corridor Enhancement
Creeks/Riparian Enhancements
Pollinator Pathways
Park Forest
Pollinator Gardens
Creeks and Channels
Water Bodies
Note: * per Local Agency Formation Commission
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Feet
Map D-1:
Opportunity to
Foster Natural Systems
Parks & Recreation
System Master Plan
Sources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.
Non-City Parks
Schools and Colleges
Cemetery
Habitats
Rural Residential/Oak Woodland
Mixed Oak Woodland
Intermittent Urban Tree Canopy
June 2019
SARATOGA
SAN JOSE
SUNNYVALE
LOS ALTOS
SANTA
CLARA
Stevens
Creek
Reservoir
SAN JOSE
StevensCreek Quarry
Lehigh PermanenteQuarry and Cement
CUPERTINOCUPERTINO
Stevens Creek to BayCalabazas Creek to BayFoothills to BaySAN JOSE
SANTA CLARA
LOS GATOS
CUPERTINO REGIONAL HABITAT CONNECTIONS
Monte Bello,
Saratoga Gap, & El
Sereno Open
Space Preserves
Fremont
Older Open
Space
Preserve
San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife
Refuge
Mission Peak
Regional Preserve
Almaden
Quicksilver
County ParkSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanete CreekPr
o
s
p
e
c
t
C
r
e
e
kRegnart
Cree
k
Junipero Serra Channel
Swiss Creek Heney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaCalabazas CreekStevens Creek
SARATOGA
SAN JOSE
SUNNYVALE
LOS ALTOS
SANTA
CLARA
Stevens
Creek
Reservoir
SAN JOSE
Homestead Rd
Lawrence ExpwyStelling RdCox Ave
Stevens Creek Blvd
McClellan Rd
Bubb RdS
t
e
v
en
s
C
an
yon
RdFoothill BlvdFo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
Pierce RdSaratoga Sunnyvale RdSunnyvale Saratoga RdDe Anza BlvdQuito RdBlaney AveWolfe RdMiller AveBollinger Rd
Rainbow Dr
Prospect Rd
Kennedy MiddleSchool
Hyde MiddleSchool
CollinsElementary
EatonElementary
FariaElementary
LincolnElementary
RegnartElementary
Garden GateElementary
Stevens CreekElementary
De AnzaCollege
StevensCreekCounty Park
Fremont OlderOpen SpacePreservePicchetti RanchOpen SpacePreserve
RanchoSan AntonioCounty ParkRanchoSan AntonioOpen SpacePreserve
StevensCreekCounty Park
Deep CliGolf Course
CupertinoHigh School
HomesteadHigh School
LawsonMiddleSchool
MontaVistaHighSchool
RanchoRinconada
CivicPark CupertinoLibrary
Cali MillPlaza
SedgwickElementary
TownSquare
Main StreetPark
SCVWDPercolationPond
Cupertino CityCenter Park
City Hall
Blackberry Farm Park
MemorialPark
CreeksidePark
LindaVistaPark
Blackberry FarmGolf Course
Varian Park
Jollyman Park
WilsonPark
Hoover Park
PortalPark
Stocklmeir
Ranch
LibraryField
Sports Centerand Teen Center
Three OaksPark
Monta Vista RecreationCenter & Park
McClellanRanch West
SomersetPark
Franco Park
Mary AveDog ParkCanyonOakPark
LittleRanchoPark
SterlingBarnhart ParkMcClellanRanch Preserve
QuinlanCommunityCenter
Community Hall
Senior Center Calabazas CreekSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanente CreekPr
o
s
p
e
c
t
C
r
e
e
k
Junipero Serra Channel
Swiss Creek Heney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaRegnart CreekStevens CreekPark and Recreation Facilities
Cupertino Parks and Recreation Facilities
Community Parks
Large Neighborhood Parks
Small Neighborhood Parks
Special Use Sites
Other Recreation Resources
Local Parks Open to Public
County Parks & Regional Open Space Preserves
Schools and Colleges
Base Map Features
Cupertino City Boundary
Cupertino Sphere of Inuence *
Railroad
Creeks and Channels
Water Bodies
Note: * per Local Agency Formation Commission
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Feet
Map D-2:
Opportunity to Enhance
Pedestrian and Bike Connectivity
Parks & Recreation
System Master Plan
Sources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.
Recreation Centers/Fields
Recreation Centers/Facilities
Other Facilities
School Sport Fields Managed by City
Other
Park/Open Space Trails
Key Opportunities
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Existing Proposed
Class I Path and Trails
Class II Bike Lanes and Class III Routes or Boulevards
Class IV Protected Bikeway
Golf Course
January 2019
SARATOGASAN JOSESUNNYVALELOS ALTOSSANTACLARAStevensCreekReservoirSAN JOSEHomestead RdLawrence ExpwyStelling RdStevens Creek BlvdBarnhart AvePhil LnMcClellan RdBubb RdSteven
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
dFoothill BlvdFoothill ExpwyPierce RdSaratoga Sunnyvale RdSunnyvale Saratoga RdDe Anza BlvdQuito RdBlaney AveTantau AveWolfe RdMiller AveBollinger RdProspect RdSaratoga Creek TrailDon Burnett Bridge & TrailFranco ParkFranco ParkEatonElementaryRanchoRinconada Kennedy MiddleSchoolHyde MiddleSchoolCollinsElementaryEatonElementaryFariaElementaryRegnartElementaryGarden GateElementaryStevens CreekElementaryStevensCreekCounty ParkFremont OlderOpen SpacePreservePicchetti RanchOpen SpacePreserveRanchoSan AntonioCounty ParkRanchoSan AntonioOpen SpacePreserveStevensCreekCounty ParkRanchoRinconada CivicParkCali MillPlazaTownSquareMain StreetParkSCVWDPercolationPondCupertino CityCenter ParkLincolnElementaryBlackberry Farm ParkMemorialParkCreeksideParkLindaVistaParkBlackberry FarmGolf CourseVarian ParkJollyman ParkWilsonParkHoover ParkPortalParkStocklmeirRanchSports CenterThree OaksParkMonta Vista RecreationCenter & ParkMcClellanRanch WestSomersetParkMary AveDog ParkCanyonOakParkLittleRanchoParkSterlingBarnhartParkMcClellanRanch PreserveBlackberry Farm ParkMemorialParkKennedy MiddleSchoolCreeksideParkHyde MiddleSchoolLindaVistaParkBlackberry FarmGolf CourseCollinsElementaryEatonElementaryFariaElementaryVarian ParkRegnartElementaryJollyman ParkWilsonParkHoover ParkGarden GateElementaryStevens CreekElementaryPortalParkStocklmeirRanchThree OaksParkMonta Vista RecreationCenter & ParkSomersetParkMary AveDog ParkCanyonOakParkLittleRanchoParkSterlingBarnhartParkStevensCreekCounty ParkFremont OlderOpen SpacePreservePicchetti RanchOpen SpacePreserveRanchoSan AntonioCounty ParkDon Burnett Bridge & TrailSaratoga Creek TrailRanchoSan AntonioOpen SpacePreserveStevensCreekCounty ParkMcClellanRanch PreserveRanchoRinconada CivicParkCali MillPlazaTownSquareMain StreetParkSCVWDPercolationPondCupertino CityCenter ParkLincolnElementarySports CenterMcClellanRanch WestCivic Center& Library FieldCivic Center& Library FieldCalabazas CreekSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanente CreekProspect CreekJunipero Serra ChannelSwiss CreekHeney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaRegnart CreekStevens CreekRecreation Centers/FieldsRecreation Centers/FacilitiesOther FacilitiesParks & RecreationSystem Master PlanBase Map FeaturesCupertino City BoundaryCupertino Sphere of Influence *RailroadCreeks and ChannelsWater BodiesNote: * per Local Agency Formation CommissionJune 20190 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.50.125MilesSources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.Schools and CollegesGolf Course (Private Ownership)Other Recreation ResourcesLocal Parks Open to PublicCounty Parks & Regional Open Space PreservesShared-Use PathsCupertino Parks and TrailsCommunity ParksLarge Neighborhood ParksSmall Neighborhood ParksSpecial Use SitesSchool Fields Managed by CityMap D-3: Access to All Public Park Acreage within a 10-minute walkAccessible Acreage10-Minute Walking Distance by Park Size in Acres0.3 - 1.001.1 - 3.03.1 - 5.05.1 - 1011 - 1520+Residential ZoningMixed-Use Development / Multi-Family ResidentialSingle Family Residential / DuplexResidential Hillside / Agricultural Residential
Homestead RdLawrence ExpwyStelling RdStevens Creek BlvdBarnhart AvePhil LnMcClellan RdBubb RdSteven
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
dFoothill BlvdFoothill ExpwyPierce RdSaratoga Sunnyvale RdSunnyvale Saratoga RdDe Anza BlvdQuito RdBlaney AveTantau AveWolfe RdMiller AveBollinger RdProspect RdSARATOGASAN JOSESUNNYVALELOS ALTOSSANTACLARASAN JOSEMcClellanRanch PreserveMcClellanRanch PreserveBlackberry Farm ParkMemorialParkCreeksideParkLindaVistaParkVarian ParkJollyman ParkWilsonParkHoover ParkPortalParkThree OaksParkSomersetParkFranco ParkSterlingBarnhartParkMain StreetParkMonta Vista RecreationCenter & ParkBlackberry Farm ParkMemorialParkCreeksideParkLindaVistaParkVarian ParkJollyman ParkWilsonParkHoover ParkPortalParkThree OaksParkSomersetParkFranco ParkSterlingBarnhartParkMain StreetParkMonta Vista RecreationCenter & ParkCivic Center& Library FieldCivic Center& Library FieldCalabazas CreekSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanente CreekProspect CreekJunipero Serra ChannelSwiss CreekHeney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaRegnart CreekStevens CreekRecreation Centers/FieldsRecreation Centers/FacilitiesOther FacilitiesParks & RecreationSystem Master PlanBase Map FeaturesCupertino City BoundaryCupertino Sphere of Influence *RailroadCreeks and ChannelsWater BodiesNote: * per Local Agency Formation CommissionJune 20190 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.50.125MilesSources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.Schools and CollegesGolf Course (Private Ownership)Other Recreation ResourcesLocal Parks Open to PublicMap D-4: Access to Neighborhood-Serving Park Acreagewithin a 10-minute WalkAccessible Acreage10-Minute Walking Distance by Park Size in Acres0.3 - 1.001.1 - 3.03.1 - 5.05.1 - 1011 - 1520+Residential ZoningMixed-Use Development / Multi-Family ResidentialSingle Family Residential / DuplexResidential Hillside / Agricultural ResidentialCounty Parks & Regional Open Space PreservesShared-Use PathsCupertino Parks and TrailsCommunity ParksLarge Neighborhood ParksSmall Neighborhood ParksSpecial Use SitesSchool Fields Managed by City
PARK SITE OVERVIEWS
E
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-1
introduction
There are a variety of opportunities for
enhancing and developing parks and facilities to
achieve community goals for Cupertino’s park
and recreation system. This Appendix provides
an overview of city park sites with a description,
focus, recent and planned improvements, and
short and longer term opportunities.
A page for each park notes the address and
includes an aerial view and photographs. A
brief description provides summary information.
The park focus identifies the park’s primary
function. The recent and planned improvements
narrative provides context for potential site
enhancement opportunities. For recently
built or recently renovated parks, near-term
opportunities emphasize sustaining existing
uses and maintaining the facilities with some
opportunities for diversifying recreation options.
For older parks and facilities that have not been
recently updated, potential site enhancements
usually include more extensive opportunities.
These opportunities are also listed by park in
Appendix F, Table F-1: Site Opportunities for
Parks & School Fields Managed by City.
park sites
This appendix includes site opportunities for the
parks listed below.
• Canyon Oak Park
• Civic Center – including Civic Center Plaza, and Library Field
• Creekside Park
• Franco Park
• Hoover Park
• Jollyman Park
• Little Rancho Park
• Linda Vista Park
• Mary Avenue Dog Park
• Memorial Park
• Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center
• Portal Park
• Somerset Park
• Sterling Barnhart Park
• Stevens Creek Corridor Park – including Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry Farm Park, and McClellan Ranch Preserve/McClellan Ranch West
• Three Oaks Park
• Varian Park
• Wilson Park
A citywide map is included on the next page to
provide an overview of park locations. This is
“Map 1” from Chapter 1 of the Master Plan, and
is reproduced here for convenience.
PARK SITE OVERVIEWS
E
E-2
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
CalabazasParkWestwoodOaks ParkMurdockParkRainbowParkSaratogaCreek ParkMaywoodParkJennyStrandParkJohnMiseParkGrantParkOrtegaParkSerraParkRaynorParkSARATOGASAN JOSESUNNYVALELOS ALTOSSANTACLARAStevensCreekReservoirSAN JOSEHomestead RdLawrence ExpwyStelling RdStevens Creek BlvdMcClellan RdBubb RdStevens
C
a
ny
o
n
R
dFoothill BlvdFoothill ExpwyPierce RdSaratoga Sunnyvale RdSunnyvale Saratoga RdDe Anza BlvdQuito RdBlaney AveWolfe RdMiller AveBollinger RdRainbow DrProspect RdBlackberry Farm ParkMemorialParkKennedy MiddleSchoolCreeksideParkHyde MiddleSchoolLindaVistaParkBlackberry FarmGolf CourseCollinsElementaryEatonElementaryFariaElementaryVarian ParkLincolnElementaryRegnartElementaryJollyman ParkWilsonParkHoover ParkGarden GateElementaryStevens CreekElementaryPortalParkStocklmeirRanchLibraryFieldSports CenterThree OaksParkMonta Vista RecreationCenter & ParkMcClellanRanch WestSomersetParkFranco ParkMary AveDog ParkCanyonOakParkLittleRanchoParkSterlingBarnhartParkCommunity HallDe AnzaCollegeStevensCreekCounty ParkFremont OlderOpen SpacePreservePicchetti RanchOpen SpacePreserveRanchoSan AntonioCounty ParkRanchoSan AntonioOpen SpacePreserveStevensCreekCounty ParkDeep CliffGolf CourseCupertinoHigh SchoolHomesteadHigh SchoolLawsonMiddleSchoolMontaVistaHighSchoolMcClellanRanch PreserveRanchoRinconada CivicParkCupertinoLibraryCali MillPlazaSedgwickElementaryTownSquareMain StreetParkSCVWDPercolationPondCupertino CityCenter ParkCity HallLynbrookHigh SchoolMillerMiddleSchoolCupertinoMiddleSchoolArchbishopMitty HighSchoolWest ValleyElementaryNimitzElementary DilworthElementaryMeyerholzElementaryMurdock-PortalElementaryDe VargasElementaryEisenhowerElementaryStocklmeirElementaryCalabazas CreekSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanente CreekProspect CreekJunipero Serra ChannelSwiss CreekHeney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaRegnart CreekStevens CreekRecreation Centers/FieldsRecreation Centers/FacilitiesOther FacilitiesParks & RecreationSystem Master PlanBase Map FeaturesCupertino City BoundaryCupertino Sphere of Influence *RailroadCreeks and ChannelsWater BodiesNote: * per Local Agency Formation CommissionFebruary 20180 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.50.125MilesSources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.Schools and CollegesGolf Course (private ownership)Other Recreation ResourcesLocal Parks Open to PublicCounty Parks & Regional Open Space PreservesShared-Use PathsCupertino Parks and TrailsCommunity ParksLarge Neighborhood ParksSmall Neighborhood ParksSpecial Use SitesSchool Fields Managed by CityMap 1: Existing Parks, Open Space and Recreation Resources
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-3
CANYON OAK PARK
CANYON OAK WAY, BETWEEN 21140 AND 21150
Description
Constructed in the early 2000’s, this 0.6-acre
park provides play equipment, seating and a
small lawn area. It enjoys a view to extensive
open space.
FOCUS
Play node for local use.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term
▪Maintain orientation to the view of
open space. Sustain existing uses.CANYON OAK WAY►N
E-4
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
ADJACENT TO 10800 TORRE AVE, AT TORRE AVE AND PACIFICA DRIVE
Description
This 3-acre area is adjacent to the Cupertino
Library and Civic Center. It is currently used by
both youth cricket and youth volleyball teams
for sports activities, and hosts occasional special
events. Its east side is bordered by Regnart
Creek.
FOCUS
Multi-use civic area for green space, recreation,
and gatherings.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
A storage area for sports equipment was
installed in 2107. A design for a trail along
Regnart Creek is in preparation.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Sustain existing uses pending
decision on implementation of
Civic Center Master Plan and
cricket field long-term location.
▪Consider creating a separate parcel
for Library Field and rezoning it as
PR zoning (park and recreation).
Longer Term
▪Consider the addition of major
facilities, relocation of cricket field if
a better site is identified, and long-
term options as civic center-related
space or permanent green space.
▪Consider whether adjacent parking
can be put underground to expand
Library Field and green space.
CIVIC CENTER ─ LIBRARY FIELD
PACIFICA DRTORRE AVE►N
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-5
CIVIC CENTER ─ PLAZA
10350 TORRE AVENUE
Description
The civic center plaza was renovated in 2004
as part of construction of the new Library and
Community Hall. The site forms the heart of
the city’s civic center. The one-acre plaza hosts
a popular interactive fountain. It also offers
benches, landscaping, wifi availability, and hosts
annual community events such as Earth & Arbor
Day and the springtime Big Bunny 5K & Kids
Fun Run.
FOCUS
Multi-use civic space for gathering and
programming.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term
▪Sustain existing uses in the short term.
▪Evaluate Civic Center Master Plan
in relation to major new facility
discussions to clarify use of Civic
Center, and adjacent areas.TORRE AVE►N
COMMUNITY HALL
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
Adjacent landscaping at City Hall was renovated
in 2017 for turf reduction and to showcase
drought-tolerant plantings. The interactive
fountain was re-opened in 2017.
CUPERTINO LIBRARY
E-6
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
CREEKSIDE PARK
10455 MILLER AVENUE, AT PHIL LANE
Description
This 13-acre site offers 3 tournament-quality
sport fields, 2 basketball hoops, 2 playgrounds,
family picnicking with barbeques, restrooms, and
a recreation building whose community room
can be rented. Creekside Park is a popular venue
for youth soccer and it currently hosts a weekly
Farmers Market. The park can be accessed from
Miller Avenue, and by pedestrians and cyclists
via a bridge over Calabazas Creek. It is the site
of the former Fremont Older School and was
extensively improved with park amenities in
1997.
FOCUS
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Consider adding nature play
and/or inclusive play elements
to the existing play area.
▪Consider other enhancements to
outdoor recreation diversity.
▪Evaluate opportunities to enhance
the recreation building and reactivate
or repurpose the concession area.
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Coordinate with results of Public
Works’ Facility Condition and
Use Assessment to modify the
recreation building as needed.
▪Refresh sports fields to maintain
site use as a sports hub. Consider
artificial turf or other enhancements
to increase the playing capacity.
▪Consider adding a full basketball
court, other sports courts, and
diverse recreation elements to
support sports and active uses.
▪Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to off-street trail and
proposed buffered bike lane.MILLER AVERECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
The restrooms were renovated in 2018. Unused
turf was recently replaced with drought-tolerant
plants and drip irrigation.►N
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-7
FRANCO PARK
10981 FRANCO COURT, AT HOMESTEAD ROAD
Description
Cupertino’s Franco Park opened in January
2011. This 0.6-acre neighborhood park includes
picnic tables and seating, as well as playground
equipment with safety surfacing and a perimeter
fence to separate the park from adjacent streets.
FOCUS
Neighborhood park.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. Park is less
than 10 years old.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term
▪Sustain existing uses.
▪Consider adding shade and
small group seating area.
▪Improve pedestrian and bicycle
access from Franco Court.
▪Evaluate possible on-street
parking and crosswalk to
Franco Court access point.
FRANCO CT
HOMESTEAD RD►N
E-8
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
HOOVER PARK
LEEDS AVENUE AND DONEGAL DRIVE, NEAR PRIMROSE WAY
Description
Hoover Park is a 5-acre site built in 1987
that offers 2 sport fields, 2 playgrounds for
elementary and pre-school age children,
basketball hoop, and family picnicking.
FOCUS
Neighborhood park and recreation and sports
space.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. Within the
last 5 years, new benches and picnic tables were
installed, trees were planted around the play
structure and a walkway to it added, drought
tolerant plantings and drip irrigation installed, as
well as trees and more efficient irrigation.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Consider adding a community
garden and diverse
recreation elements.
▪Consider providing a larger/
full-size basketball court.
▪Consider a looped walking
path and restrooms.LEEDS AVE
►N
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-9
JOLLYMAN PARK
1000 SOUTH STELLING ROAD, NEAR CARRIAGE CIRCLE
Description
Constructed in the early 1990’s, this 11.2-acre
park offers soccer play, baseball field with batting
cage, 2 playground areas, a basketball hoop,
turf areas, family picnic areas with barbeques,
restrooms and a walking loop.
FOCUS
Neighborhood and community hub for sports,
recreation programs and activities.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
Accessibility upgrades were added in 2018 at
the north playground plus a walkway to the
south playground from Stelling Road. A drinking
fountain with water bottle filler was also added
in 2018. An inclusive playground project is being
proposed in association with a recent grant
award. Benches were recently added, the fence at
Stelling Road entry replaced and extended, and
trees planted in the southwest part of the site.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Pursue adding an all-inclusive play
area, grouped seating, a picnic
shelter, continuous all-weather loop
path (that includes the east part of
the park), and neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure.
▪Sustain existing uses.
▪Respond to community request
for trial off-leash dog area.
Longer Term
▪ Consider additional diverse
amenities, such as outdoor
fitness equipment/parcourse or
a full-size basketball court.
▪ Provide connections to bikeway
improvements on Stelling Rd.
DE FOE DR DUMAS DRS STELLING RD ►N
E-10
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
LINDA VISTA PARK
11111 LINDA VISTA DRIVE, NEAR COLUMBUS AVENUE
Description
This 11-acre park site includes a reservable large
group picnic/barbecue area, two playground
areas (pre-school and elementary), a fitness
station, restrooms, and an extensive turf area.
It was acquired in 1968 and renovated to its
current configuration in 1986.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Select design concept to
repair or repurpose the inactive
ponds. Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Repair or renovate the ponds
(per 2014 technical report).
▪Consider adding neighborhood-
serving event utilities and infrastructure,
a picnic shelter or pavilion, a
destination nature play and/or water
play area, and diverse recreation
elements, potentially including
adventure and challenge elements.
▪Consider a community garden or
demonstration, healing or rain garden.
▪Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to the proposed
off-street trail. Consider installing
outdoor exercise equipment in
addition to, or as replacement for,
existing parcourse equipment.
►NDEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSELINDA VISTA DRIVE
FOCUS
Neighborhood and community hub for
picnicking and nature-based recreation.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-11
23635 OAK VALLEY ROAD
Description
Constructed in the early 2000’s, this 0.3-acre
park serves its neighbors with play equipment,
benches and landscaping.
FOCUS
Play node for local use.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term
▪Sustain existing uses.
LITTLE RANCHO PARK
OAK VALLEY ROAD ►N
E-12
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
MARY AVE DOG PARK
10309 MARY AVENUE
Description
Opened in early 2014, Mary Avenue Dog Park
is Cupertino’s first park designed for off-leash
dogs. This 0.5-acre site provides a fenced areas
for large and small dogs, benches, and a dog
drinking fountain.
FOCUS
Dog park and gathering site for dog owners/
friends.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. In the last
2 years, trees were planted, picnic tables added,
and new trash/recycling receptacles installed.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term
▪Enhance existing use.
▪Consider adding shade, varied
terrain, small group seating
areas, dog amenities (such
as dog agility features).
MARY AVE
►N
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-13
MEMORIAL PARK
21251 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
Description
Memorial Park was originally constructed in
the early and mid 1970’s. Additional elements
have been added since, such as the Veterans
Memorial in 2007. Memorial Park is the city’s
largest park, with 22 acres (including the Senior
and Quinlan Community centers). It offers 6
lighted tennis courts, a lighted baseball field, an
outdoor amphitheater and stage, walking paths,
reservable group picnicking, 2 playgrounds,
restrooms, and lawn areas. Memorial Park hosts
the city’s large outdoor events such as the Cherry
Blossom, Kids ‘N Fun, and Diwali festivals. The
amphitheater is home to annual Shakespeare in
the Park, Summer Concert series, and Cinema at
Sundown events.
FOCUS
Community hub and multi-use, civic- focused
event space.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017.
Landscaping in front of Quinlan was renovated
in 2018 with drought tolerant planting and drip
irrigation. A capital project to develop a master
plan and design concept for Memorial Park
improvements is funded.STEVENS CREEK BLVDANTON WAYALVES DRCHRISTENSEN DR►NSPORTS
CENTER
SENIOR
CENTER
QUINLAN
COMMUNITY
CENTER
E-14
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
▪Engage the public in developing a
site master plan for Memorial Park as
a community hub and multi-use, civic-
focused event space. Include the
presence of the Quinlan Community,
Senior, and Sports centers in planning
Memorial Park as a community space.
▪Consider repurposing the inactive
pond, renovating the amphitheater,
adding walking path improvements
and playable water feature,
enhancing the tree canopy,
integrating natural features,
and renovating, adding and/
or expanding recreation facilities
to enhance indoor and outdoor
event space, community gathering
space, active/healthy recreation
uses and play opportunities.
▪Clarify the role of memorials at this
site, addressing opportunities to make
a community-building statement and/
or tribute to community cohesiveness.
Short Term
▪Implement Phase 1 improvements
in the pond/amphitheater area.
▪Consider nature integration,
shade, ADA accessibility, pathway
and seating improvements,
pond re-purposing, and other
elements consistent with the
site master plan process.
Longer Term
▪Phase in additional improvements,
including improvements to existing
facilities, based on the site master
plan, and the addition of recreation
opportunities. Pending the site master
plan, this may potentially include
major facilities (such as an aquatic
facility, gymnasium/recreation center,
senior center expansion and/or a
potential performing/fine arts center)
at this site, or as an expansion of an
adjacent recreation building that
would affect this site (Sports Center,
Senior Center e.g.), as well as the
addition or repurposing of facilities.
▪Provide connections to proposed
trails, bike lanes and bike routes.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-15
MONTA VISTA PARK & RECREATION CENTER
22601 VOSS AVENUE, AT SOUTH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
Description
The site of a former elementary school, Monta
Vista Park and Recreation Center was acquired
by the City and renovated as a park in 1982.
Additional improvements to the softball area
occurred in 1993. This 6.2-acre park offers a
2-building recreation center including restrooms,
two tennis courts, 2 softball fields and a batting
cage, turf areas, play equipment, and family
picnicking. A preschool and gymnastics/martial
arts programs are currently hosted at this site, as
is girls’ softball.
FOCUS
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Consider temporary options
to expand play opportunities
near the preschool.
▪Consider restriping tennis court(s)
to share for pickleball.
▪In conjunction with major facility
business plans, explore opportunities
to relocate or expand the
gymnastics/martial arts & preschool
programs to other facilities.
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Address renovation or replacement
of the existing multi-use and
preschool buildings based on major
facility recommendations and in
coordination with Public Works’
Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
▪Consider adding a basketball court,
picnic shelter, neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure, and
other diverse recreation elements.
▪Provide connections to
proposed buffered bikeway.
VOSS AVE S FOOTHILL BLVDWOODRIDGE CT
►N
E-16
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
PORTAL PARK
10225 NORTH PORTAL AVENUE, NEAR AMHERST DRIVE
Description
Portal Park, designed in the late 1960’s, is one
of the city’s oldest. Portal Park with its 3.8
acres offers a reservable group picnic area, 2
playgrounds, rolling turf, a recreation building
and restrooms. The play areas were renovated in
2002-03. This site borders L.P. Collins Elementary
School.
FOCUS
Neighborhood park and gathering space.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. The
concrete area behind the recreation building was
recently improved.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Improve walkway lighting
and signage.
▪Explore options to share
adjacent school parking.
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Consider adding shading to the
picnic area, grouped seating, nature
play area and/or inclusive play
elements, and diverse recreation
elements, such as badminton, bocce/
lawn bowling, and/or games to
support small group gatherings.
▪Improve connections to
the adjacent school.
▪Re-evaluate the location and
use of the recreation building,
considering relocating the building
or the preschool-age and child
programming or adding indoor
restrooms, and in coordination
with Public Works’ Facility
Condition and Use Assessment.
▪Provide connections to the
proposed bike boulevard and
adjacent neighborhoods.
N PORTAL AVE ►N
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-17
10798 STOKES AVENUE AT NORTHERLY TERMINUS
Description
Somerset Park was constructed in the early
1970’s and renovated in 1996. Somerset Park’s
neighborhood enjoys its 1.7 acres of picnic area,
playground, basketball hoop, trees and lawn
space.
FOCUS
Neighborhood park.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. Trees and
planting were recently added throughout the
park.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Consider adding a community
garden, dog area, and/ or larger
basketball area or other amenities.
▪Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to the De Anza
Trail if it is implemented.
SOMERSET PARK
STOKES AVE
►N
E-18
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
10486 STERLING BOULEVARD
Description
Sterling Barnhart Park is one of the city’s newer
parks and was dedicated in August 2010. This
0.5 acre site provides playground equipment,
picnicking, game table, benches, and plantings
which include California native species. This
site is bordered by Saratoga Creek, and offers
pedestrian-bicycle access to Saratoga Creek Trail
on the opposite creek bank.
FOCUS
Play node with trail connection.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. Trees were
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short & Longer Term
▪Sustain existing uses.
▪Consider effects of an extension
of Saratoga Creek Trail or
the acquisition of Lawrence-
Mitty property, if pursued.
STERLING BARNHART PARK
STERLING BLVDLAWRENCE EXPY►N
recently planted along the park frontage, and a
concrete walkway and mowband added.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-19
STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK ─
BLACKBERRY FARM GOLF COURSE
22100 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
Description
Blackberry Farm
Golf Course is
a nine-hole Par
29 golf facility
acquired by the
City in 1991, from
private owners
who had built it in
1962. The course,
located along
Stevens Creek,
offers narrow
tree-lined fairways
and small greens
which reward
accuracy. The
course includes
a putting green
and a range
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
▪Complete the Stevens Creek
Corridor Master Plan.
Short Term
▪Phase in improvements as guided
by the site master plan, enhancing
natural/habitat areas and facilities
supporting environmental education,
gatherings and recreation uses, while
retaining the natural character of
the park. Provide connections to
any extension of the Stevens Creek
Trail & nearby bikeways. Provide
trailhead amenities. Stabilize east
creek bank at 22050 Stevens Creek
Blvd. per results of the concept design
project, using methods similar to those
employed in upstream restoration.
Longer Term
▪Implement renovation of Stocklmeir
Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf Course,
Blackberry Farm Park, and/ or
McClellan Ranch Preserve and West,
and other corridor parcels, consistent
with the recommendations of the
Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
structure for drive practice. A pro shop with
golf merchandise and a restaurant are on site;
professional instruction is available. Footgolf is
also offered.
FOCUS FOR STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK
Community-focused natural area supporting
environmental education, outdoor gathering and
recreation consistent with protecting wildlife and
habitat value.
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
►N
E-20
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK ─
BLACKBERRY FARM PARK
21979 SAN FERNANDO AVENUE
Description
Blackberry Farm was acquired by the City
in 1991. It has been subsequently renovated,
including extensive improvements in 2009
which also included the Stevens Creek Trail
and creek restoration. The trail and creek
corridor parkland are open daily. The group
picnic grounds and pool complex are operated
seasonally, currently from May to September,
within a 100-day window. Seasonal amenities
include 2 swimming pools with pool buildings
and lawn area, reservable group picnic area
with barbeques and sinks, and food service
concession. Additional amenities include 2
volleyball courts, 2 bocce courts, 2 horseshoe
pits, picnic tables, playground, lawn area, trail,
and restrooms. The creek corridor setting, all-
weather trail and wildlife viewing opportunities
are popular year-round.
FOCUS FOR STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK
Community-focused natural area supporting
environmental education, outdoor gathering and
recreation consistent with protecting wildlife and
habitat value.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
Replastering of the pools is scheduled for late
2019. A feasibility study is funded to identify
alternatives for improving pedestrian and
bicycle access at the San Fernando entry.
SAN FERNANDO AV
E
►N
BLACKBERRY
FARM GOLF
COURSE
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-21
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
▪Complete the Stevens Creek
Corridor Master Plan.
Short Term
▪Phase in improvements as guided
by the site master plan, enhancing
natural/habitat areas and facilities
supporting environmental education,
gatherings and recreation uses, while
retaining the natural character of
the park. Provide connections to any
extension of the Stevens Creek Trail &
nearby bikeways. Provide trailhead
amenities. Complete feasibility work &
if approved, pursue implementation
of improved pedestrian & bicycle
access to Blackberry Farm Park via
San Fernando Ave. Evaluate steps for
expanded use of Blackberry Farm.
Longer Term
▪Implement renovation of Stocklmeir
Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf Course,
Blackberry Farm Park, and/ or
McClellan Ranch Preserve and West,
and other corridor parcels, consistent
with the recommendations of the
Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
E-22
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK ─
McCLELLAN RANCH PRESERVE & McCLELLAN RANCH WEST
22221 AND 22241 MCCLELLAN ROAD
Description
Purchased by the City
1972, McClellan Ranch has
a rich history, including
uses for agriculture and
as a horse ranch. The
site contains various
buildings relating to its
past as well as the relocated
Parrish tank house and
Blacksmith Shop. A new
Environmental Education
Center was completed in
2015. The 4-H area was
renovated and Stevens
Creek Trail constructed in
2008-2009. McClellan Ranch is the hub of the
city’s environmental education activities and
hosts City Naturalist-led programs. This site
offers community gardens for residents, a stretch
of Stevens Creek Trail, riparian habitat areas,
plus creek and wildlife views. Rolling Hills
4-H, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, and
Friends of Stevens Creek Trail are housed at this
site. McClellan Ranch was designated as the
city’s first and only nature and rural preserve in
1976; its name was updated to McClellan Ranch
Preserve in 2012. McClellan Ranch West, a 3.1-
acre parcel, was acquired in 1990.
M c CLELLAN
R
D
►N
FOCUS FOR STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR APRK
Community-focused natural area supporting
environmental education, outdoor gathering and
recreation consistent with protecting wildlife and
habitat value.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
At McClellan Ranch Preserve, Blacksmith Shop
renovation and new Environmental Education
Center were completed in 2015. The tank house
was repaired in 2013. A community gardens
renovation project is planned for 2019/2020. At
McClellan Ranch West, the residential structure
was removed in 2016. In 2019, restoration
plantings and parking improvements were added.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-23
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Immediate
▪Complete the Stevens Creek
Corridor Master Plan.
Short Term
▪Phase in improvements as guided
by the site master plan, enhancing
natural/habitat areas and
facilities supporting environmental
education, gatherings and
recreation uses, while retaining the
natural character of the park.
▪Provide connections to any extension
of the Stevens Creek Trail & nearby
bikeways. Provide trailhead amenities.
Longer Term
▪Implement renovation of Stocklmeir
Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf Course,
Blackberry Farm Park, and/ or
McClellan Ranch Preserve and West,
and other corridor parcels, consistent
with the recommendations of the
Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
E-24
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
7535 SHADOWHILL LANE
Description
This 3.1-acre neighborhood park was constructed
in 1980, with a later renovation of the play area
in 1996. Three Oaks Park offers playgrounds,
family picnicking, walkways and lawn space. It
is also known for the distinctive large oak trees
that are its namesake.
FOCUS
Neighborhood park with nature emphasis.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
No currently planned improvements. Additional
benches were recently installed.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Address successional tree plantings
to maintain character.
▪Consider adding nature play
area and/or inclusive elements
and repurposing or improving the
southeasterly rock play area.
▪Consider adding neighborhood-
serving event utilities and
infrastructure, and diversifying
recreation opportunities.
THREE OAKS PARK
MOLTZEN DR
CANDLELIGHT WAYRUPPELL PLSHADOWHILL LN ►N
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX E
E-25
VARIAN PARK
22220 VARIAN WAY
Description
This is a 6.3-acre site includes two tennis courts,
2 playgrounds, an apricot orchard, lawn areas,
walkways, and family picnic areas. It is adjacent
to Stevens Creek Elementary School.
FOCUS
Neighborhood park with tennis, passive
recreation, orchard and habitat focus.
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Consider expanding or replacing play
area with nature play area and/or
thematic or inclusive play elements.
▪Consider restriping tennis court(s)
to share for pickleball.
▪Consider other enhancements
for outdoor recreation diversity.
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Consider diverse recreation
elements focused on passive
uses and nature education.
▪Consider community garden,
outdoor classroom, pollinator
patches and interpretive signage.
▪Maintain connections to
adjacent school.
▪Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to proposed bikeway.
VARIAN WAY STONYDALE DRAMELIA CT STEVENS CREEK
ELEMETARY SCHOOL
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017.
Minor accessibility upgrades to the entry were
constructed in 2017. ►N
E-26
SITE-SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES|cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
WILSON PARK
10200 PARKSIDE LANE AND 10249 SOUTH PORTAL AVENUE
Description
This ~10-acre park includes 3 baseball fields
on the west side of the site and serves as the
community’s baseball hub. The east side of the
site features 2 playgrounds, family picnicking,
restrooms, pathways, a large turf area, and a
recreation building that hosts ceramics programs.
The eastern part of Wilson Park was constructed
in the late 1960’s. Park improvements on the
western part, including the baseball fields,
batting cage and concession building, were
constructed in 1992. A portion of the site was
renovated in 2003 (restroom building, play area).
FOCUS
Neighborhood and community hub for sports,
recreation and activities.
RECENT/PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
The tennis courts were resurfaced in 2017.
Minor accessibility upgrades to the entry were
constructed in 2017. Drought tolerant and native
SITE ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
Short Term
▪Consider adding neighborhood-
serving event utilities and
infrastructure, picnic shelter, and
a large/full-size basketball court.
▪Sustain existing uses.
Longer Term
▪Evaluate use of and desirability of
renovating/replacing the ceramics
building, particularly if ceramics can
be incorporated into a fine arts or
recreation facility, and in coordination
with Public Works’ Facility
Condition and Use Assessment.
▪Consider a wider, maintenance-
friendly loop path, community
garden, variety of sports courts,
activity hubs, and diverse recreation
elements, including those that
provide challenge elements.
▪Consider full-size basketball court.
▪Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to nearby bikeways
and proposed off-street trail. If
desired, a sport field can fit on
the east portion of the site (with
relocation of the central play area
and picnicking reconfiguration).PARKSIDE LNWINTERGREEN DRRODRIGUES AVE
COLD HARBOR AVE►N
plantings with drip irrigation were recently
installed.
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS
F
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
29
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
F-1
introduction
The systemwide objectives and actions presented
in Chapter 3 have implications for park and
facility development and renovation. This
appendix introduces site- and facility-specific
opportunities to guide capital projects at
existing parks and potential future sites. These
items are intended to be flexible, recognizing
that additional site master planning, market
studies and business plans will influence the
ultimate design, development and construction
of new parks, facilities and trails, along with
the renovation of several key park sites. These
project suggestions are intended to supplement
Master Plan goals, objectives, and actions by
guiding future planning, decisions on site
selection and features, and project phasing.
The opportunities are divided into three
matrices, based on the types and scale of the
projects:
•Site-specific opportunities for existing City
parks
•Opportunities for new major parks, trails and
major recreation facilities
•Opportunities for added recreation elements
Following these matrices, this appendix
summarizes planning-level cost estimates and
assumptions for potential new projects.
site opportunities for
existing city parks
The Master Plan presents site opportunities for
each existing site in the City’s park inventory,
including City parks and school fields currently
managed by the City. For each site, Table F-1
provides the following information:
•Acres: Total site acreage.
•Vision/Park Focus: Defines the general vision
for the park, the site function and purpose
for site enhancements to provide overarching
guidance for site improvements and added
features.
•Site Enhancement Opportunities: Describes
the specific enhancement opportunities
recommended for further consideration.
Notes are provided about the general timeline
for evaluating potential projects, including
enhancement opportunities that may occur
in the following time frames: immediate (1-2
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS
F
F-2
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
years), short-term (2-7 years) and longer-term
(8+ years). The actual phasing and sequencing
of projects is opportunity-driven and may
vary depending on funding, site master
plans recommendations, business planning,
partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities
and similar variables. Longer-term projects
also may be moved to the short term under
the right circumstances, contingent on project
prioritization.
•Suggested Projects: Each site may be suited
for various types of enhancements, as noted
in this section.
◊Master Plan/Design Process: Requires
developing master plans/design concepts
and/or conducting feasibility/market
studies and business plans. This applies
to existing sites slated for significant
enhancements and facility development.
◊Potential Major Facility Development:
Describes the opportunity to build
or renovate a major facility, such as a
community recreation center, aquatic
facility or performing arts center (as
defined in the next section of this
appendix). This enhancement opportunity
may include making significant upgrades
to an existing facility by adding new
major features. Such enhancements have
the potential to change the purpose and
character of the park.
◊Potential Added Recreation Facilities:
Describes the opportunity to provide
one or more unique or new features at a
site, such as play areas, sports facilities,
group gathering spaces and other diverse
recreation amenities and facilities (as
described in the third section of this
appendix).
◊Potential Natural Vegetation
Enhancement: Describes the opportunity
to provide enhancements to existing
natural features and vegetation in parks or
create new features that support nature-
based programs and expand natural/
habitat areas at existing site.
•Suggested Level of Investment: Based on
community priorities and site opportunities,
each site is suggested for one of three
different levels of investment, ranging from
the greatest level of reinvestment to support
multiple improvements or enhancements to
a level that maintains the current function of
the site:
◊Major Reinvestment: Consider providing
extensive level of improvements/
upgrades to an existing park. Major
renovations may include major facilities
or new, large-scale, signature park
elements such as play areas, sports fields,
extensive trails, considerable accessibility
improvements, new picnic shelters, new
restrooms etc.
◊Minor Reinvestment: Consider providing
small- to medium-level improvements
or upgrades to an existing park. Minor
renovations may include a series of
elements such as small park features,
an enhanced play area, a seating area,
trail, new/renovated sports courts, small
circulation adjustments, site furnishings,
plantings etc.
◊Assets Sustained/Replaced: Ensure the
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
F-3
existing use of the park is sustained by
maintaining, improving or replacing
existing facilities. This recommendation
does not imply that an older or worn
facility must be replaced with the same
type and style of facility. It is intended to
describe improvements or enhancements
that do not significantly alter the existing
amount or type of site use.
new major park and
recreation facility
opportunities
Given community priorities and needs, the
City of Cupertino may choose to explore
opportunities to add new parks, trails, and
major new facilities in the future. Each of these
projects would require a substantial investment,
potentially in new land acquisition and/or
facility construction. While partnerships and
opportunities to reduce costs by renovating
existing sites may be explored, Table F-2 defines
these key large-scale investments, their desired
amenities, and potential opportunities to address
these needs. The following information is
presented for each type of project:
• Opportunity: Describes the purpose and
focus of the enhancement opportunity.
• Potential Elements: Provides a list of
potential programs and features to include,
based on community preferences, priorities
and needs. Amenities, program options and
uses will be determined through site master
plans, facility business plans, and market
studies.
• Site Selection and Distribution: Identifies
relevant consideration when selecting sites
or distributing these types of recreation
across the community (where more than one
park or facility providing this type of service
may be provided). Using these criteria,
specific sites would be identified through the
completion of more detailed site master plans
and other decision-making processes based
on community priorities, the availability
of project resources and site opportunities
emerging over time. All sites should consider
access, transportation, parking and transit
needs.
• Phasing/Options: Describes a potential
timeline for considering these opportunities,
including options to explore collaborating
with potential partners before pursuing new
park or facility development. Enhancement
opportunities may occur in the following
time frames: immediate and short-term
(1-7 years) and longer-term (8+ years).
The actual phasing and sequencing of
projects is opportunity-driven and may
vary depending on funding, site master
plans recommendations, business planning,
partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities
and similar variables. Longer term projects
may be moved to the short term under the
right circumstances.
• Potential City-Owned Locations: Identifies
specific City parks or types of parks
in Cupertino where the recommended
enhancement or new facility could be located.
Specific locations include community parks
and large neighborhood parks.
F-4
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
• Potential Alternate Locations: Identifies
opportunities to consider other sites that
are not currently owned or managed by the
City of Cupertino. These other opportunities
include acquiring new land, coordinating
with private partners on partner-owned
land, purchasing and repurposing existing
buildings, or building on sites identified
through a joint-use agreement, such as a
school, County or other publicly-owned
space.
• Planning Level Project Cost Estimate:
Identifies planning level cost estimates and
potential ranges of costs for each project/
facility added. Costs are noted in 2018
dollars, not accounting for inflation. They
represent planning level estimates based
on general assumptions about future park
and facility development. Cost for major
facilities also factor in comparables to existing
facilities using publicly accessible estimates.
In most cases, a base cost is provided as a
conservative opinion of cost and serves as a
baseline for cost considerations. Ranges are
provided given the lack of detail in actual
program, components, or sizing of elements.
• Operating Cost: Identifies order of magnitude
cost assumptions for operations for added
major facilities to provide a sense of the
operational and staffing impacts associated
with these potential new projects. Operations
costs are presented using dollar symbols as
defined below:
◊ $ = no new staffing; minimal impact on
existing operating budgets.
◊ $$ = minimal new staffing; modest impact
on existing operating budgets.
◊ $$$ = moderate new staffing; facility
expected to cover much or most of its
staffing and programming costs over time.
◊ $$$$ = extensive new staffing; facility
expected to need city subsidy during early
years but could cover much of its staffing
and programming costs over time (~80+%).
◊ $$$$$ = extensive new staffing; facility
expected to involve ongoing significant
annual city subsidy.
opportunities for added
recreation
elements
Cupertino residents would like to see a variety
of recreation amenities and facilities adding
in the community. Table F-3 presents on the
following different types of recreation elements
and features that the City should strive to add
in existing parks or other locations to meet
community needs. As in the previous section,
these opportunities specify the type of project
suggested, the potential features it may include,
consideration for the siting and distribution of
these facilities, consideration in the timing of
projects or development of multiple facilities,
and potential City-owned and other sites where
the project may be appropriate.
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedImmediate: Engage the public in developing a site master plan for Memorial Park as a community hub and multi-use, civic-focused event
space. Include the presence of Quinlan Community Center, Senior Center, Sports Center in planning Memorial Park as a community
space. Consider repurposing the inactive pond, renovating the amphitheater, adding walking path improvements and playable water
feature, enhancing the tree canopy, integrating natural features, and renovating, adding and/or expanding recreation facilities to
enhance indoor and outdoor event space, community gathering space, active/healthy recreation uses and play opportunities. Clarify the
role of memorials at this site, addressing opportunities to make a community-building statement and/or tribute to community cohesiveness. √√
Short term: Implement Phase 1 improvements in the pond/amphitheater area. Consider nature integration, shade, ADA accessibility,
pathway and seating improvements, amphitheater improvements, pond re-purposing, and other elements consistent with the site master
plan process. √√√
Longer term: Phase in additional improvements, based on the site master plan, including improvements to existing facilities, development
of any selected major new facilities, and the addition of recreation opportunities. Pending the site master plan, this may potentially include
major facilities such as an aquatic facility, gymnasium/recreation center, senior center expansion and/or a potential performing/fine arts
center at this site, or as an expansion of an adjacent recreation building that would affect this site (Sports Center, Senior Center e.g.), as
well as the addition or repurposing of facilities. Provide connections to proposed trails, bike lanes and bike routes.√√√√
Immediate: Complete the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.√√
Short term: Phase in improvements as guided by the site master plan, enhancing natural/habitat areas and facilities supporting
environmental education, gatherings and recreation uses, while retaining the natural character of the park. Provide connections to any
extension of the Stevens Creek Trail & nearby bikeways. Provide trailhead amenities. Stabilize east creek bank at 22050 Stevens Creek Blvd.
per results of the concept design project, using methods similar to those employed in upstream restoration. Complete feasibility work & if
approved pursue implementation of improved pedestrian & bicycle access to Blackberry Farm Park via San Fernando Ave. Evaluate steps
for expanded use of Blackberry Farm.√√√
Longer term: Implement renovation of Stocklmeir Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry Farm Park, and/ or McClellan Ranch
Preserve and West and other corridor parcels, consistent with the recommendations of the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.√√√√
Short term: Consider adding nature play and/or inclusive play elements to the existing play area. Consider other enhancements to outdoor
recreation diversity. Evaluate opportunities to enhance the recreation building and reactivate or repurpose the concession area. Sustain
existing uses. √
Longer term: Coordinate with results of Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment to modify the recreation building as needed.
Refresh sports fields to maintain site use as a sports hub. Consider artificial turf or other enhancements to increase the playing capacity.
Consider adding a full basketball court, other sports courts, and diverse recreation elements to support sports and active uses. Provide
trailhead amenities and connections to existing/proposed off-street trail and proposed buffered bike lane.√√√√√
Short term: Sustain existing uses. √√
Longer term: Consider adding a community garden and diverse recreation elements. Consider providing a larger/full-size basketball court.
Consider a looped walking path and restrooms.√√√
22.1
63.7
Creekside Park
Site
City Parks and Facilities
Community hub and multi-use, civic-
focused event space
Community-focused natural area
supporting environmental education,
outdoor gathering and recreation
consistent with protecting wildlife and
habitat value
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub
COMMUNITY PARKS
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
13.0
Table F-1: Site Opportunities for Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Hoover Park Neighborhood park and recreation and
sports space
Memorial Park
Stevens Creek Corridor Park
5.0
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedSite
Short term: Pursue adding an all-inclusive play area, grouped seating, a picnic shelter, continuous all-weather loop path (that includes the
east part of the park), and neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure. Sustain existing uses. Respond to community request for
trial off-leash dog area.√√√√
Longer term: Consider additional diverse amenities, such as outdoor fitness equipment/parcourse or a full-size basketball court. Provide
connections to bikeway improvements on Stelling Rd. Consider for location of development of major new facilities.√√√
Short term: Select design concept to repair or repurpose the inactive ponds. Sustain existing uses. √
Longer term: Repair or renovate the ponds (per 2014 technical report). Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and
infrastructure, a picnic shelter or pavilion, a destination nature play and/or water play area, and diverse recreation elements, potentially
including adventure and challenge elements. Consider a community or demonstration, healing or rain garden. Provide trailhead amenities
and connections to the proposed off-street trail. Consider installing outdoor exercise equipment in addition to, or as replacement for,
existing parcourse equipment.√√√√
Short term: In conjunction with major facility business plans, if pursued, explore opportunities to relocate or expand the gymnastics/martial
arts & preschool programs to other facilities. Consider temporary options to expand play opportunities near the preschool. Consider
restriping tennis court(s) to share for pickleball. Sustain existing uses.√√
Longer term: Address renovation or replacement of the existing multi-use and preschool buildings based on major facility
recommendations and in coordination with Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Consider adding a half or full basketball
court, picnic shelter, neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure, and other diverse recreation elements. Provide connections to
proposed buffered bikeway.√√√√√
Short term: Improve walkway lighting and signage. Explore options to share adjacent school parking. Sustain existing uses.√
Longer term: Consider adding shading to the picnic area, grouped seating, nature play area and/or inclusive play elements, and diverse
recreation elements, such as badminton, bocce/lawn bowling, and/or games to support small group gatherings. Improve connections to
the adjacent school. Re-evaluate the location and use of the recreation building, considering relocating the building or the preschool-age
and child programming or adding indoor restrooms, and in coordination with Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Provide
connections to the proposed bike boulevard and adjacent neighborhoods.√√√√
Short term: Consider expanding or replacing play area with nature play area and/or thematic or inclusive play elements. Consider
restriping tennis court(s) to share for pickleball. Consider other enhancements for outdoor recreation diversity. Sustain existing uses.√√√
Longer term: Consider diverse recreation elements focused on passive uses and nature education. Consider community garden, outdoor
classroom, pollinator patches and interpretive signage. Maintain connections to adjacent school. Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to proposed bikeway.√√√
Short term: Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure, picnic shelter, and a large/full-size basketball court.
Sustain existing uses.√√√
Longer term: Evaluate use of and desirability of renovating/replacing the ceramics building, particularly if ceramics can be incorporated
into a fine arts or recreation facility, and in coordination with Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Consider a wider,
maintenance-friendly loop path, community garden, variety of sports courts, activity hubs, and diverse recreation elements, including
those that provide challenge elements. Consider full-size basketball court. Provide trailhead amenities and connections to nearby
bikeways and proposed off-street trail. If desired, a sport field can fit on the east portion of the site (with relocation of the central play area
and picnicking reconfiguration).√√√√√
Varian Park 6.3
11.2
Linda Vista Park 11.0
Neighborhood and community hub for
sports, recreation and activities
Jollyman Park Neighborhood and community hub for
sports, recreation programs and activities
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub
Portal Park
Neighborhood and community hub for
picnicking and nature-based recreation
Neighborhood park and gathering space
Neighborhood park with tennis, passive
recreation, orchard and habitat focus
9.9
6.2
3.8
Wilson Park
Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedSite
Canyon Oak Park 0.6 Play node for local use Short and longer term: Maintain orientation to the view of open space. Sustain existing uses. √√
Franco Park 0.6 Neighborhood park Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses. Consider adding shade and small group seating area. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access
from Franco Court; evaluate possible on-street parking and crosswalk to Franco Court access point.√√
Little Rancho Park 0.3 Play node for local use Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses.√
Short term: Sustain existing uses. √
Longer term: Consider adding a community garden, dog area, and/ or larger basketball area or other amenities. Provide trailhead
amenities and connections to the De Anza Trail if it is implemented. √√√
Sterling Barnhart Park 0.5 Play node with trail connection Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses. Consider effects of an extension of Saratoga Creek Trail or the acquisition of Lawrence-Mitty
property, if pursued. √√
Short term: Sustain existing uses. √
Longer term: Look to address successional tree plantings to maintain character. Consider adding nature play area and/or inclusive
elements and repurposing or improving the southeasterly rock play area. Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and
infrastructure, and diversifying recreation opportunities.√√√
Civic Center
Civic Center Plaza/Community
Hall 1.0 Short and longer term: Evaluate Civic Center Master Plan in relation to major new facility discussions to clarify use of Civic Center and
adjacent areas. Sustain existing uses in the short term.√√√
Short term: Sustain existing uses pending decision on implementation of Civic Center Master Plan and cricket field long-term location.
Consider creating a separate parcel for Library Field and rezoning it as PR zoning (park and recreation). √
Longer term: Consider the addition of major facilities, relocation of cricket field if a better site is identified, and long-term options as civic
center-related event space or permanent green space. Consider whether adjacent parking can be put underground to expand Library
Field & green space.√√√√√
Mary Avenue Dog Park 0.5 Dog park and gathering site for dog
owners/friends Short and longer term: Enhance existing use. Consider adding shade, varied terrain, small group seating areas, dog amenities. √√√
Short term: Implement seismic upgrades. Consider implementing improvements to the locker rooms, showers, restrooms, and reception
area as approved in the 2018-19 budget. Revisit site use in the Memorial Park Master Plan and facility business plan associated with the
development of a Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use Recreation Center and/or Aquatics Center, if proposed for Memorial Park, and
consider opportunities for a combined facility. Plan to re-locate the teen center to a different location to optimize teen access and re-
purpose teen area for sport uses.√√
Longer term: Renovate the facility, potentially adding recreation uses compatible with the Memorial Park Master Plan, any related facility
business plan, and Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment.√√√
4.0 Regional connectivity and native
plantings
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school and trail, and regional destinations. Consider improved habitat plantings
that provide year-round beauty and seasonal interest.√√
0.4 Local connectivity, park access and
riparian corridor protection Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities, enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor, and adding green infrastructure. √√
Saratoga Creek Trail 4.7 Regional connectivity and riparian
corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities, enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor, and adding green infrastructure.
Encourage connections to regional destinations.√√
Neighborhood park with nature emphasis
Multi-use civic area for green space,
recreation, and gatherings
Multi-use civic space for gathering and
programming
Library Field 3.0
Cupertino Sports Center 6.2
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge
& Trail
TRAIL CORRIDORS
Indoor/outdoor sports hub
Three Oaks Park 3.1
Somerset Park 1.3 Neighborhood park
Creekside Park and Regnart Creek
Trail
SPECIAL USE SITES
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedSite
Stevens Creek Trail -Local connectivity, park access and
riparian corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities and green infrastructure. Encourage connections between trail, City parks, County
parks and nearby schools. Work with the County to implement a pedestrian-bicycle access to Rancho San Antonio from Stevens Creek
Blvd. with parking/trailhead amenities per the adopted Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Study. Continue to
implement habitat restoration and to protect the riparian corridor. Install interpretive signage/ elements including for historical resources.√√
Collins Elementary School 2.5 Sports fields and recreation facilities
Short and longer term: Encourage connections and shared uses between school and Portal Park. Pursue partnerships with School District to
improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to address nearby needs. Encourage connections to proposed bikeways.
Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Eaton Elementary School 4.5 Sports fields and recreation facilities Short and longer term: Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. Encourage
connections to proposed bikeway.√
Faria Elementary School 4.2 Sports fields and recreation facilities Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to
address nearby needs. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Garden Gate Elementary School 2.9 Sports fields and recreation facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to
address nearby needs. Encourage connections to proposed bikeway. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to
broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Hyde Middle School 7.8 Sports fields and recreation facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District at Hyde Middle and/or nearby Sedgewick Elementary to improve public
access or to add or enhance recreation facilities. Encourage connections to proposed bikeway. Continue joint-use agreement for sport
field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Kennedy Middle School 13.3 Sports fields, recreation facilities and
trail/school access
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school, proposed De Anza Trail if implemented, and nearby parks. Continue joint-
use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. √
Lincoln Elementary School 3.1 Sports fields and recreation facilities Short and longer term: Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. Encourage
connections to proposed bikeway.√
Regnart Elementary School 4.1 Sports fields, recreation facilities and
trail/school access
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school, proposed trail if implemented, and nearby parks. Pursue partnerships with
School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use &
explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Stevens Creek Elementary School 3.1
Sports fields, recreation facilities,
park/school connections, trail/school
access.
Short and longer term: Encourage connections and shared uses between school and Varian Park and connections to proposed bikeway.
Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. √
SCHOOL FIELDS (currently managed by city)
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****
Short term: Explore joint use agreements with schools
and/or other partners to improve access to existing
facilities especially in underserved areas. Evaluate
opportunities to acquire or partner to develop any
vacant School District parcels. Acquire site(s), or
develop agreements to foster public use of existing or
partner facilities, as opportunities arise. Pursue
acquisition of Lawrence-Mitty parcels on the west side
of Lawrence Expressway. Engage the public in
creating site concepts and develop site(s). Consider
during acquisition whether neighborhood park
guidelines can be met. (Refer to Master Plan
objectives for guidelines for acquisition.) Encourage
creative solutions to providing park and recreation
spaces, including consideration of smaller spaces.
X X X $10-15,000,000/ 3 acre site &
acquisition (about $10M/ acre 2018
estimates)
$$
Longer term: Continue to acquire site(s) as
opportunities arise. Engage public in creating site
concepts and develop site(s). Consider during
acquisition whether neighborhood park guidelines
can be met.
X X X
Short term: Identify project priorities. Explore joint use
agreements with SCVWD that support implementation
of creek trails. Continue to pursue opportunities for
planned trail development. Require dedication or
easements for trails as part of the development
review process, where appropriate. Dedicate or
acquire open space along creeks and utility corridors
for trails through regional cooperation, grants and
private development review. Emphasize
implementation of the Cupertino Loop Trail.
X X TBD; Costs for trails will be based on
Public Works’ estimates
Longer term: Build more trails and improve trail
corridors. Connect parks via walkways to nearby trails
and ensure key parks include trailhead amenities.
Continue to pursue opportunities for planned trail
development. Require dedication or easements for
trails as part of the development review process,
where appropriate. Dedicate or acquire open space
along creeks and utility corridors for trails through
regional cooperation, grants and private
development review.
X X X X X X X X
Coordinate to develop trails from the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, regional plans and this
Master Plan that support multi-use
recreation, park access and connectivity to
community destinations.
-accessible, firm and stable multi-use, off-road
trails
-signage/wayfinding
-distance/mileage markers
-information kiosks
-crossings
-seating
-interpretive elements or art
-outdoor fitness equipment/par course elements
-adjacent soft-surfaced jogging trail
-green infrastructure
-wider corridor for greenspace protection or
riparian enhancement
Prioritize connections between parks,
schools, and trails; extensions of
existing trails; gap closures; and
completing loop trails.Other/Repurposed BuildingTable F-2: New Major Park & Recreation Facility Opportunities
Revised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Develop 1-3 parks. Prioritize
underserved areas especially in north
and east Cupertino per findings
regarding underserved areas.
Numbers of parks and size may vary
depending on opportunities. Strive to
acquire 3.5+ acres if possible.
Trails and Trail Corridors
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use SitesPotential New Parks
Potential New Trails
-play opportunities
-seating
-green space/open lawn
-small group gathering space/picnic area
-looped walking path
-game space
-active-use courts as space allows
-neighborhood-serving amenities
-landscaping/native plantings
If opportunities arise, acquire and develop
new neighborhood parks especially in
targeted underserved areas.
Neighborhood Parks
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****Other/Repurposed BuildingRevised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use Sites
Short term: Pursue opportunities to partner with existing
aquatics providers including schools. If a new city
facility is desired, prepare a market analysis and
business plan to evaluate site selection and program
elements and define anticpated operating costs.
Phasing to be dependent on business plan. Explore
acquisition opportunities. Consider as part of the
Memorial Park Master Plan. Consider opportunities to
combine with the existing Sports Center and/or a new
Gymnasium/Multi-Use Recreation Center.
X X $45-60,000,000 $$$$$
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a year-round
aquatics facility.
X X X X X X
Short term: Pursue partnership and joint use
opportunities to provide gym space. If a new
gym/multi-use rec center is desired, prepare a market
analysis and business plan to evaluate site selection
and program elements and define anticipated
operating costs. Consider as part of the Memorial
Park Master Plan. Consider opportunities to combine
with the existing Sports Center and/or a new
Gymnasium/Multi-Use Recreation Center.
X X X $30-40,000,000 $$$
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a multi-
generational gymnasium and multi-use recreation
center complex. Consider multi-story design solutions
and rooftop use.
X X X X X X X
Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use
Recreation Center
Explore partnership opportunities to provide
gym space. If a new facility is warranted and
desired in the future, provide a multi-
generational gymnasium complex and
recreation center to provide sports court
spaces and support other activities.
-full size basketball court(s) with bleachers and
dividing walls
-volleyball, badminton, pickleball space or
overlays
-fitness studios
-gymnastics space
-multipurpose rooms for smaller court sports and
other activities
-senior fitness room
-multi-purpose rooms (reservable) and meeting
rooms
-program space
-social space/coffee kiosk
-teen room
-childcare room
-possible additional features such as climbing
wall; rooftop/elevated track
-locker rooms, family changing rooms
-office space
-lobby/front desk/reception
-equipment room and storage
-nearby parking
If pursued, develop one centrally
located facility; could be co-located
or combined with other major
facilities. Ensure additional space for
parking and grounds with access via
arterial/collector street. Nearby transit
desirable. This facility would have
synergy with an Aquatics Center or a
Teen Center.
Aquatics Facility Explore partnership opportunities to provide
year-round aquatics. If a new facility is
warranted and desired in the future, provide
year-round swimming facility designed for
recreation and instructional swimming,
aquatic exercise / lap swimming, and pool
events.
-lap pool
-warm water instructional pool
-recreation pool
-hot tub
-zero depth entry
-lazy river
-water play features
-support spaces such as lifeguard/office space,
locker rooms, family changing rooms, outdoor
showers, storage, mechanical space,
lounge/spectator areas
-cost recovery features such as all-purpose
spaces, birthday party rooms, concessions, and
rental features
-nearby parking
If pursed, develop one facility in an
accessible location; consider sites in
central and east Cupertino or
opportunities to co-develop with
another centralized major facility to
increase programming options.
Provide parking and access via
arterial/collector street, ideally near
transit.
Provide a minimum of 2-3 acres.
Could be co-located with another
identified proposed or existing facility.
Potential New Major Facilities
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****Other/Repurposed BuildingRevised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use Sites Short term: Explore partnership and joint use
opportunities with high schools and DeAnza College
or other potential partners with existing performing arts
space to meet immediate needs. If a new city facility
is desired, prepare a market analysis and business
plan to evaluate site selection and potential program
elements and define anticipated operating costs.
X X X $60-100,000,000 $$$$
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a performing and
fine arts center with arts wing.
X X X X X X
Short term: Continue to refine and expand teen
services. Maintain existing teen center facility without
significant reinvestment. Coordinate with the School
District on the Lawson Teen Center Pilot Program for
mobile recreation options. Consider other partnership
opportunities to create a unique teen space in
Cupertino. Consider a trial project to test teen interest
in teen amenities at Creekside Park.
X X
Longer term: Integrate teen uses into a multi-
generational facility or new teen space if pursued,
and repurpose the existing Teen Center. Continue
hosting teen activities at school sites and other
locations besides the Teen Center.
X X X X X X X X
Performing/Fine Arts Center Explore partnership opportunities to
provide performing/fine arts space. If a
new facility is warranted and desired in
the future, develop a community
auditorium and/or fine and performing
arts center to house community-scale
performances and support daytime arts
and recreation programs as well as
evening programs and events.
-industry-standard stage
-professional lighting
-sloped floor, fixed seating
-pull-down screen
-dressing rooms
-restrooms
-backstage storage
-box office, lobby, concessions
-smaller theater/rehearsal space
-dance studio/floor
-recording & television studio
-arts wing for drawing, painting,
photography, theater, dance, music/voice
lessons
-arts/crafts/ceramics spaces
-practice/instruction rooms
-reservable multi-purpose room-dance
studio/floor
-maker/incubator space (computer lab,
graphics & animation studio, industrial
shop)
-catering kitchen
-offices
-storage
-outdoor (or indoor/outdoor) event space
or art plaza
-ceramics/crafts/art spaces
-nearby parking
If pursued, develop one facility in
a centralized location near
businesses, restaurants and/or
attractions. Consider space near
potential partners, Cupertino's
civic center, or nightlife-oriented
downtown areas. Ensure
additional space for parking and
grounds with access via
arterial/collector street and
ideally near transit.
May be co-located with other
major facilities (e.g., community
center, senior center), but
typically lacks synergy with other
active uses (e.g., sports fields,
gymnasiums, and swimming
pools).
-study room
-café
-computer lab and/or video gaming
-game room
-meeting/program space
-open gym; basketball hoop
-kitchen
Location near a middle and/or high
school, library or shopping/downtown
area. Consider Library/Civic Center,
high school/middle school corridors,
and Wilson & Creekside parks. Do not
develop as a stand-alone facility.
Consider co-locating with gymnasium
complex, performing/ fine arts center,
incubator/ maker space or other
major facility.
Create unique teen space that may include
student union-style gathering and program
space and/or active indoor use for teens.
Enhanced Teen Space or Services
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****Other/Repurposed BuildingRevised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use Sites
Short term: Conduct survey to evaluate interest in
alternative locations as well as alternative recreation
opportunities for seniors; explore potential locations
based on results. Develop mobile activities as a test
pilot to gauge interest in new locations and new
programs. Explore partnership opportunities. Conduct
a facility evaluation to evaluate facility renovations
that would enhance the function, capacity and
financial sustainability of the Senior Center.
X X X X $15-25,000,000 $$$
Longer term: Consider potential Senior Center
renovations, and providing older adult recreation with
a multigenerational gymnasium complex,
performing/fine arts center, or other major facilities if
pursued.
X X X X X
Short term: Continue to maintain existing facility
without significant reinvestment. Consider reuse of
buildings and space in conjunction with other major
facilities. Coordinate with results of Public Works'
Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
X X X X
Longer term: Renovate, replace or relocate buildings
as needed.X X X X
Other Replaced or Repurposed Existing
Building
Re-evaluate and consider replacement or
repurposing of existing aging, worn or
underperforming buildings in conjunction
with the development of new facilities.
-range of options including removing or
replacing buildings with new buildings or
additional recreational facilities
-projects dependent on major facility
development and considerations
Re-evaluate the following aging
facilities:
-Monta Vista buildings (multi-use &
preschool buildings)
-Wilson Park ceramics building
-Portal Park stand-alone building
-Stevens Creek Corridor Park aging
infrastructure, consistent with
outcomes of Stevens Creek Corridor
Master Plan (Stocklmeir Ranch house,
Blue Pheasant/Pro Shop, Blackberry
Farm pool complex, McClellan
Ranch Barn, former residence at
22050 Stevens Creek Blvd., etc.)
Expanded Senior Center or Services Provide additional recreation space for older
adults, and both frail and active seniors.
Incorporate senior space into a multi-
generation facility, such as as gymnasium
complex/recreation center, if such a facility
is pursued in the future.
-2-story addition with elevator access to second
floor (if existing center expanded)
-exercise rooms or half-court gym space
-multi-age programming space for frail to active
seniors
-arts & crafts room
-music rooms of different sizes with presentation
capacity
-additional classrooms and meeting rooms
-private consultation/health/conference room
-front desk/reception area
-office space
-storage
-accessible parking and drop off areas
-parking lot circulation improvements
-outdoor low impact game space, gardens,
and activity areas
If warranted, expand existing Senior
Center, and consider other locations
to expand distribution of senior
activities. Co-locate senior activities
in other recreation areas to
encourage multi-age programming
as well as a range of offerings for frail
to active seniors.
Potential Major Facility Enhancements
* Note: Si
tes w
ill be determined through site master plans, trails plans and other decision-making processes based on community priorities, the availability of project resources and site opportunities emerging over time. All sites should consider access, transportation, parking
** Note: The actual phasing and sequencing of projects is opportunity-driven and may vary depending on funding, site master plans recommendations, business planning, partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities and similar variables. Longer term projects may be moved
to the short term under the right circumstances.
***See PLANNING LEVEL COST ASSUMPTIONS & ESTIMATES for further delineation of assumptions.
Key to Operations Costs:
$ = no new staffing; minimal impact on existing operating budgets
$$ = minimal new staffing; modest impact on existing operating budgets
$$$ = moderate new staffing; facility expected to cover much or most of its staffing and programming costs over time
$$$$ = extensive new staffing; facility expected to need city subsidy during early years but could cover much of its staffing and programming costs over time (~80+%)
$$$$$ = extensive new staffing; facility expected to involve ongoing significant annual city subsidy
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Short Term: Create a pilot program at one site,
considering a park with good tree canopy and
natural features. Evaluate and pursue opportunities
for a destination nature play area that incorporates
water play elements.
X X X X X X X $300,000
Longer Term: Build a permanent nature play area.
Develop 2-3 additional nature play areas at parks or
along trail corridors that are geographically
distributed.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Short Term: Plan, design and build a destination all-
inclusive play area. Incorporate Feasibility Study
findings. Evaluate and pursue opportunities to add
inclusive play options citywide at additional park sites
that are geographically distributed.
X $1,000,000-5,000,000
Longer Term: Implement opportunities to integrate
other universal play elements (e.g., swings, slides)
that are geographically distributed at existing play
areas when replacing play equipment at the end of
its lifecycle or renovating a park site. Emphasize
community parks and large neighborhood parks for
installation of more extensive universal/all-inclusive
elements
X X X X X X X X X X X
Short Term: Consider as part of the Memorial Park
Master Plan. Develop an action play to identify top
sites and prioritization for implementing at least one
new water play area in the short term.
X $1,000,000-2,000,000
Longer Term: Consider opportunities in community
parks and large neighborhood parks to add water
play features. These may be stand-alone new areas
or integrated into existing play areas.
X X X X X X X X X
Improved Outdoor Event Space --
Citywide Events
Provide event space to support large group
events and programs (500+ people).
-infrastructure
-utilities (electricity, water, restrooms, lighting)
-staging areas
-loading and unloading zones
-large group amphitheaters
-event hardscape or lawn
-portable stage and other equipment
-improved park circulation
-support amenities (mix of permanent and portable
elements, including shade, seating, restrooms,
parking, bike parking, drinking fountains, trash
receptacles)
Focus on improvements to existing event space, such as
Memorial Park and the Civic Center, to take advantage of
the existing amenities, centralized location and transit
access. Improve pedestrian/bike access and infrastructure.
Short Term: Include better event infrastructure and
amphitheater and circulation improvements in the
Memorial Park Master Plan. Begin improvements,
phased as per the site master planning timeline.
Longer term: Evaluate options and improve
Creekside Park and the Civic Center for events and
markets.
X X X $200,000-1,500,000
Improved Outdoor Event Space--
Neighborhood Events
Provide event space to support small group
events, programs and outdoor classes (50-
500 people).
Smaller event spaces could accommodate
neighborhood movies, small performances,
cultural events, meet-up group activities,
mobile programming and outdoor classes,
such as yoga and tai chi, and 'art in the
park' activities.
-hardscape
-utilities
-sloped hillside and stage
-portable stage, screen and other equipment
-lawn area
-shade
-pavilion or outdoor classroom with movable chairs
and tables for flexible program use
-support amenities such as restrooms and parking
Parking, electrical power, restrooms, room to
accommodate stage(s) and attendees, bike parking, and
seating are considerations. Nearby transit is desirable.
Short Term: Develop one pilot project. Provide
hardscape/softscape areas and access to power.
Longer Term: Identify and plan projects for 1-2
additional sites. Include an outdoor pavilion or space
to accommodate a portable stage.
X X X X X X X X X X X X $200,000-1,500,000
Develop 3 to 4 geographically dispersed across the city.
Provide play areas in a mix of community parks, large
neighborhood parks, smaller parks and trail corridors.
Locate at least one in a more natural site and in a park
where natural elements/native plantings exist or are being
added. These may replace an existing play area at the end
of its lifecycle. Create at least one destination nature play
facility in a more centralized, accessible location.
Provide one that is centrally located in a community park or
large neighborhood park. Accessible parking necessary
and nearby transit access desirable. Pursue integrating
other universal play elements in additional parks.
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingGeographically distribute 3-4 different types of water play
opportunities. Consider adding to community parks and
large neighborhood parks, taking into account the existing
interactive fountain at Community Hall and a potential
new water play feature in Memorial Park renovations or at
a new Aquatics Facility. Provide one destination water play
feature in a community park that is centralized for easy
access.Public-private partnershipTrail CorridorsPotential Added Recreation Facilities
-play area designed for all ages and abilities
-stimulation for multiple senses (tactile/touch;
auditory/hearing; visual/sight; gustatory/taste;
olfactory/smell; proprioception [body awareness];
vestibular processing [understanding changes in
location, orientation in space, and balance]; and
interception)
-parallel play with different levels of challenge
-shade
-accessible and diverse seating arrangements
Support all-inclusive and universal play by
providing a destination universal / all-
inclusive play area and adding additional
inclusive elements at existing play areas.
Table F-3: Opportunities for Added Recreation Elements
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsUniversal/All-Inclusive Play Areas
Nature Play Areas Provide nature play elements in parks to
connect people to nature and support
experiential play.
Water Play Integrate a variety of water play
opportunities at existing parks.
-interactive water play feature
-playable water channel
-spray play areas
-splash pads
-hand pump and sand play area
-climbable elements such as logs, stumps, boulders,
mounds and trees
-water features or water play features (hand pump,
e.g.)
-sand, mud, wood chips, rocks
-movable pieces, such as branches for fort-building
-other natural play elements consistent with the site
character
-plants and trees
-butterfly gardens
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingPublic-private partnershipTrail Corridors
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsMulti-Use Sport Fields Increase the playing capacity of existing
sports fields. If feasible, add new multi-use
rectangular fields. Address needs for fields if
an existing field is displaced by new facility
development.
-regulation-size rectangular field lined for soccer,
multi-use
-regulation-size diamond field designed for
baseball/softball
- diamond field with rectangular field overlay where
feasible
-turf or artificial turf
-field lighting, if feasible
-amenities such as bleachers, dugouts, concessions,
and shade
Given size requirements, provide improvements and new
fields where feasible.
Short Term: Explore options to keep the existing ball
field at Memorial Park as part of the site master
planning process. Explore joint use agreements with
schools to provide additional access to existing sport
fields. Evaluate and implement changes to field
scheduling to increase capacity and usage.
Longer Term: Continue to improve amenities at
existing fields. Acquire ownership or use of other
site(s) as opportunities arise.
X X X X X X X X X X $2,500,000+
Cricket Field Develop a community-size field to support
youth and adult cricket play.
-regulation size turf field and pitch for adult play, but
if space is constrained, to support youth play
-may be overlay on other field sports
-may consider international size field if developed
through partner collaboration
-may include amenities such as lighting, storage,
shade, concessions
Provide one field in an accessible location. Consider large
neighborhood parks, community parks and partner sites,
such as schools and parks provided by other cities or
agencies. Avoid displacing existing fields. See Cricket Field
Study for reference regarding necessary support amenities if
an international size field is considered at a partner site.
Cupertino needs are based on providing a community-size
field for youth and adult play.
Short Term: Explore opportunities to partner with the
County, School District, neighboring city or other
jurisdiction to create a shared/joint-use facility in the
region to support youth and adult play.
Longer Term: If a suitable site is identified, partner to
design and build facility. Depending on the nature
and type of facility constructed, re-evaluate needs
for the Library Field youth cricket field.
X X $5,000,000
Dog Park(s)/Dog Off-Leash Area(s)Provide additional dog parks, smaller dog
runs, and/or off-leash areas.
-unfenced off-leash area; may be temporary or
permanent and demarcated by signage, cones or
similar features
-smaller dog run, mid-size dog area, or full size dog
park with different fenced areas for small and large
dogs
-fence, suited to character of park
-double entry gate
-turf, decomposed granite, other suitable surfacing,
or combination
-dog waste dispensers
-dog drinking stations
-water pools
-seating and picnic tables
-shade shelter
-lighting
-topography and landscaping
Provide two or more additional facilities or off-leash areas
to be geographically distributed (away from existing facility
at Mary Avenue). Consider large and small neighborhood
parks.
Short Term: Identify potential sites and determine
neighborhood support. Respond to residents’ request
for a trial off-leash dog area. If implemented and
successful, pursue at additional suitable sites.
Longer Term: Develop dog runs, off-leash areas or
dog parks. Note: the timing may be considered in
conjunction with park site master planning.
X X X X X X X X X X X X $600,000
Basketball Courts Provide basketball courts to diversify
recreation and sports opportunities.
-full-size courts are strongly preferred and are
prioritized
-consider half-size courts or hoops where space does
not allow full-size
-lighting, if feasible
Provide 3-4 or more courts to be geographically distributed.
New facilities may be considered in replacement of existing
half courts and hoops (Somerset, Hoover, Jollyman, and
Creekside), at additional large neighborhood parks or joint-
use schools.
Short Term: Develop 1-2 courts.
Longer Term: Develop 1-2 or more courts.
X X X X X X X X X X $250,000
Pickleball Courts Provide pickleball courts to diversify
recreation and sports opportunities.
-pickleball courts (paired if possible)
-tournament-friendly pickleball venue (6+ courts)
Provide 4 or more courts to be geographically distributed
and a tournament venue in a convenient location.
Consider joint-striping of existing tennis courts at Varian Park,
Monta Vista Park and Memorial Park. (Avoid joint-striping
tennis courts used for competitive play.) Consider providing
courts in neighborhoods or sites in need of low-impact
fitness activities for seniors and adults.
Short Term: Develop 2 courts. Consider overlays or
joint striping of existing tennis courts that only support
recreational play. Consider pickleball striping for
multi-court tournament venue in conjunction with
Memorial Park Master Plan.
Longer Term: Develop 2 or more additional courts
and pickleball complex.
X X X X X X X X X X $30-40,000+, $500-600,000
Potential Added Recreation Facilities Cont.
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingPublic-private partnershipTrail Corridors
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsGardens Provide more opportunities for community
gardens. Pursue a healing garden.
Consider opportunities for gardens of other
types in parks, such as demonstration
gardens, rain gardens and orchards.
For community gardens:
-combination of in-ground, raised beds, and
accessible planting areas
-individual reservable plots and group spaces
-fencing, water, composting/green waste recycling
-native plant hedges or hedgerows
-seating, shade
For Healing garden:
-garden showcasing healing plants
-informational/educational elements
Other gardens:
-demonstration garden showcasing methods of
gardening or different plant palettes such as organic
gardening techniques, xeriscaping, native species,
plantings for pollinators, birds and wildlife
-bird baths and bird houses
-rain garden and stormwater garden elements
-orchards or permaculture plantings
-sister city-inspired gardens
Provide 1-2 or more new community gardens at site(s)
agriculturally suitable for growing, based on aspects such
as soil conditions, topography and solar access.
Geographically disperse from existing facility at McClellan
Ranch. Consider locations suitable to support educational
and social use, such as near a school or senior center.
Consider areas of higher residential density with less access
to gardening space. Consider smaller, neighborhood-scale
gardens at more numerous locations.
Identify a venue for a healing garden that is agriculturally
suitable and can accommodate intended features and
visitorship.
Short Term: Develop a community garden
implementation plan that renovates in a timely
manner the existing site at McClellan Ranch and
identifies suitable sites and priorities for
implementation. Add at least one or more
community gardens in an underutilized area or
unneeded lawn area within a park, preferably in an
area with higher density population.
Longer Term: Evaluate demand and needs for
additional community gardens. Implement
additional community gardens accordingly. Select a
location and support implementation of a healing
garden. Consider development of other types of
horticultural gardens.
X X X X X X X X X X X X $500,000 for community
garden
Outdoor Recreation Diversity Provide a broader range of outdoor
recreation opportunities, including facilities
that support individual and group activities,
with a broad range of varied challenge
levels. Diversify facilities to appeal to
Cupertino's diverse population and reflect
Cupertino's unique character.
-loop paths & mile markers
-outdoor fitness equipment
-bocce, lawn bowling or petanque
-outdoor table tennis (ping pong)
-outdoor chess
-badminton
-volleyball
-pickleball
-futsal
-tai chi
-disc golf
-bike skills area/pump track
-parkour obstacle course
-climbing spire
-zip line
-outdoor "living rooms"
-family-style long tables
-thematic play areas
-sound garden
-self-directed hike/app stations
-other facilities to respond to new trends and diverse
cultural needs
Provide at least one unique feature or facility at every
community park and large neighborhood park. Consider
smaller unique elements at other sites, or use art, colors,
and facility choices to create different recreation and play
experiences.
Short Term: Plan and develop one pilot project at
one park to add diversity elements in the first year.
Then rotate through parks and update one to two
parks a year with new elements. Implement an
outdoor table tennis pilot program at 1-2 sites by year
2 to evaluate usage and interest. Identify a suitable
site and implement installation of outdoor fitness
equipment during years 2-5.
Longer Term: Continue rotating through parks and
update one to two parks a year. Evaluate options to
add more diverse and unique features whenever
existing facilities are renovated or replaced.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X $100,000/year
Improved Comfort & Amenities Provide amenities to create welcoming,
inclusive, safe, and comfortable parks for
people of all ages and cultural groups.
Integrate amenities to reflect park
character.
-seating with shade through structures or plantings
-shade shelters (with movable tables/chairs, picnic
tables, or other seating)
-variety of seating options and groupings
-restrooms where appropriate
-drinking fountains/ bottle fillers/ dog drinking dishes
-lighting
-trash/recycling receptacles
-parking
-permeable paving
-bike racks, docking stations
-alternative transportation pickup/drop offs
-art (playable, integrated, stand-alone, and/or
temporary displays)
-signage and wayfinding
-interpretive elements, information kiosks
-wifi
-co-working stations/outdoor work space
-multilingual or icon-based signage
Consider needs at all parks. (Small neighborhood parks may
not need restrooms or parking, e.g.)
Short Term: Update amenities and furnishings at 1-2
sites in conjunction with other park projects. Prioritize
parks with trails, with active walkers and that lack
shade.
Longer Term: Seek to provide comfort improvements
at one site every year, distributed throughout the
system.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X $100,000/year
Potential Added Recreation Facilities Cont.
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingPublic-private partnershipTrail Corridors
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsNatural Vegetation Enhancements Reduce turf areas where not actively used
for recreation, and replace with a range of
alternative plantings while considering
maintenance needs.
-native plantings
-natural area protection/restoration
-habitat enhancements
-bioswales
-lawn reduction
-invasive plant removal
-tree preservation and protection (including
orchards, park forests)
-successional tree plantings
-pollinator patches, gardens and corridors
-bee hives
-bird habitat, baths and houses
-riparian enhancements
Explore opportunities to naturalize park spaces not used for
recreation. Provide pollinator corridors through the city.
Short Term: Integrate natural elements into parks
upon renovation or development. Work with partners
to identify significant natural areas to prioritize
enhancements and restoration (potentially in
conjunction with trail development). Consider
natural vegetation enhancements as part of the
Memorial Park Master Plan. Identify defined tasks,
including adding pollinator, habitat and/or native
plantings that are actionable in the short term.
Prepare guidelines for use of native vegetation and
wildlife-friendly elements for parks that are in
proximity to creeks and for trails along creek
corridors.
Longer Term: Seek to reduce lawn and provide
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X $100,000/year
**The actual phasing and sequencing of projects is opportunity-driven and may vary depending on funding, site master plans recommendations, business planning, partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities and similar variables. Longer term projects may be moved to the short term under the right circumstances.
Potential Natural Vegetation Enhancements
* Note: Sites will be determined through site master plans, trail plans and other decision-making processes based on community priorities, the availability of project resources and site opportunities emerging over time.
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
F-18
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
planning level cost
assumptions & estimates
This section presents planning-level cost
estimates and costing assumptions.
These opinions of costs are noted in 2018 dollars
and do not account for inflation. They represent
planning level estimates reflecting general
assumptions about future park and facility
development. Construction costs are noted based
on MIG experience in costing parks with similar
amenities. Cost for major facilities also factor in
comparables to existing facilities using publicly
accessible estimates. In most cases, a base cost
is provided as a conservative opinion of cost
and serves as a baseline for cost considerations.
Ranges are provided given the lack of detail
in actual program, components, or sizing of
elements.
These planning level costs may be used to guide
next steps in implementing capital improvement
projects. All costs will need refining through
facility and site master planning efforts, and/
or during the development of design and
construction documents. Changes to project
scopes and programming, combining or
separating facilities, acquiring land or building
at City-owned sites, or introducing phases to
development will all have impacts to costs.
Given the current volatility in land price and
construction costs, all costs will also need
adjustment for inflation and current construction
conditions at the time of implementation.
Current construction cost rise in the San
Francisco Bay Area is considerably higher
than the cost of living inflation rate, so it will
be important to apply appropriate inflation
adjustments. For example, if construction cost
rise is 5%/year, then cost of construction will be
1/3 higher within 6 years.
New Parks and Major Recreation Facilities
Costs associated with Table E-2: Planning
Level Costs for New Major Park & Recreation
Facilities are described below. Project costs are
based on an estimated construction cost, plus
a 65% allowance for ‘soft’ costs such as design,
engineering, environmental clearance, project
management, construction inspection and
testing, and other expenses. The total project
cost therefore allocates 60% to construction and
40% to other costs. Estimates do not include land
acquisition or new parking, as those expenses
cannot be accurately estimated at this time. Note:
No costs are identified for New Trails and Trail
Corridors, which should reference Public Works’
construction costs.
New Neighborhood Park (Per 3-Acre Park)
Land Acquisition TBD1
Project Estimate $10-15,000,0002
Operating Cost $$
1 Land acquisition is too variable to anticipate as
it is dependent on a variety of factors including
but not limited to numbers and size(s) of
parcel(s) and whether land is purchased, gifted,
provided in lieu or a joint-use site. However,
current data for Cupertino indicates that the
value of land suitable for a park is approximately
$10M/ acre in 2018.
2 Project estimate assumes development of a
3-acre site with $60 per square foot costs which
accommodates a range of site improvements
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
F-19
including concrete formwork, landscaping,
infrastructure, and facilities such as play areas
with synthetic safety surfacing, sports courts,
game tables and activity hubs, picnic tables and
seating, possible small shade shelter, and open
grass areas for play. Costs will likely need to
be updated based on the site master plan and
any phasing. This cost is per 3-acre site. Smaller
parks incur higher maintenance costs per acre
than larger ones.
Aquatics Facility
Land Acquisition TBD1
Project Estimate $45-60,000,0002
Operating Cost $$$$$
1 Land acquisition is too variable a cost to
anticipate as it is dependent on a variety of
factors including but not limited to size of
parcel(s) or whether the parcel is already City-
owned, purchased, gifted, or provided in lieu.
Additional considerations are whether it is a
joint-use facility on other lands or developed
with a partner; or whether an aquatics facility is
built as a standalone facility or combined with
another facility, such as a gymnasium complex.
2 Project estimate is a starting point and assumes
a construction budget of ~$30,000,000. This is
based on recent aquatic center studies. This is a
placeholder and will need to be updated based
on the program and size developed during a site
master planning effort.
Gymnasium Complex and Multi-Use Recreation Center
Land Acquisition TBD1
Project Estimate $30-40,000,0002
Operating Cost $$$
1 Land acquisition is too variable a cost to
anticipate as it is dependent on a variety of
factors including but not limited to size of
parcel(s) or whether the parcel is already City-
owned, purchased, gifted, or provided in lieu.
Additional considerations are whether it is a
joint-use facility on other lands or developed
with a partner.
2 Project estimate assumes a construction
budget of ~$20-25,000,000 based upon recent
construction of nearby gyms and athletic centers,
which are used as a guide until the space
programming for the building is determined in
the site master planning effort.
Performing/Fine Arts Center
Land Acquisition TBD1
Project Estimate $60-100,000,0002
Operating Cost $$$$
1 Land acquisition is too variable a cost to
anticipate as it is dependent on a variety of
factors including but not limited to size of
parcel(s) or whether it is purchased, gifted, or
provided in lieu. Additional considerations are
whether it is a joint-use facility on other lands or
developed with a partner.
2 Project estimate assumes a construction budget
of $40-55,000,000. This is based on costs of similar
projects. This is a placeholder and will need
to be updated based on the program and size
developed during a site master planning effort.
Enhanced Teen Services
Teen services are anticipated to be a
programmatic expansion accommodated in
a major facility of another type (such as a
gymnasium/recreation center or performing
F-20
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
arts venue) or provided via a partnership.
Additionally, providing enhanced teen services
could be addressed through programs with
limited capital improvements (e.g., not a teen-
specific venue). Consequently, no capital costs
are noted here. Capital improvement costs
should be considered if a separate teen venue
is considered or a teen venue is proposed at a
partner site, such as a school.
Enhanced Senior Services – Senior Center Addition
Land Acquisition N/A1
Project Estimate $15-25,000,0002
Operating Cost $$$
1 Additional senior services are recommended as
an expansion of the existing center at Memorial
Park or in conjunction with another facility (such
as a performing/fine arts center). For this reason,
no acquisition costs are noted here.
2 Project estimate is directly related to the
program changes and the type and amount of
improvements. Assuming that changes would
require expansion of the building, a ~$10-
15,000,000 construction budget is a placeholder
and will need to be updated based on the
program and size developed during a site master
planning effort.
Other Replaced or Repurposed Existing Building
The need for new or replacement buildings at
parks such as Portal, Monta Vista or Wilson
should be coordinated with the results of the
Public Works facility assessment evaluation
study that is currently underway.
added recreation
elements
Costs associated with Table F-3: Opportunities
for Added Recreation Elements are noted below.
Planning-level costs are identified for one of each
type of amenity, based on the assumptions noted
below.
Nature Play Area
Project Estimate $300,0001
1 Cost varies based on the size, number of
components, and complexity of the nature play.
This cost assumes construction of a modest
nature play component added to an existing play
area without utility coordination or water play.
Universal/All-Inclusive Play Area
Project Estimate $1,000,000-
2,000,0001
1 Cost varies based on the size of the area being
developed, number and type of components,
whether it is a full play area renovation or add-
ons to an existing play area, and complexity
of the universal/all-inclusive play. This cost
assumes construction of an all-inclusive play
space adjacent to an existing play area. A full-
size, destination, all-inclusive play area similar to
‘Magical Bridge’ or Rotary PlayGarden would be
in the $5M+ range.
Water Play
Project Estimate $1,000,000-
2,000,0001
1 Cost varies based on the size, number/type
of components, and complexity of the water
play and utility coordination. This cost assumes
construction of water play adjacent to an existing
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
F-21
play area with accessible potable water and utility
connections, similar in size to the one at John D.
Morgan Park in Campbell.
Improved Outdoor Event Space
Project Estimate $1,000,000-
2,000,0001
1 Cost is a starting point and is based on an
allowance of $200-500,000 per park site and
improvements at 2-4 sites, but is dependent on
the park site plan, programming needs, location
and capacity of existing infrastructure and
utilities, and the extent of the changes. The cost
assumes some electrical work, lighting, loading
areas, event hardscape, and supporting amenities.
Costs will vary depending on the type and size
of stage/event area, parking and circulation
improvements if needed, and existing utility
and infrastructure capacity. Costs will need to be
updated based on the concept plan for each park
and current construction conditions.
Multi-Use Sport Field
Project Estimate $2,500,000+1
1 Cost is a starting point and is based on
~$1,500,000 of improvements but is dependent
on the site master plan, existing infrastructure,
and the extent of the changes. This assumes one
regulation soccer/multi-use field with lawn or
artificial turf, irrigation, and some site amenities.
Multiple baseball or softball fields would be more
expensive given the additional fencing, backstops
etc. This cost does not include field lighting. Costs
will need to be updated based on the concept
plan/site master plan and current construction
conditions.
Cricket Field
Project Estimate $5,000,000+1
1 Cost is based on ~$3,000,000 of improvements
but is dependent on the site master plan and the
extent of the changes. This assumes a cricket field
appropriate for practice and adult play but not
a cricket stadium or regional facility. Costs will
need to be updated based on the site master plan
and current construction conditions.
Dog Park/Dog Area
Project Estimate $600,0001
1 Cost varies based on the extent of the changes.
The estimate is a starting point based upon
~$350,000 construction cost and assumes that a
dog area is added to an existing park of a size
similar to the Mary Avenue Dog Park. Cost would
increase depending on the size of the dog area,
whether there are water features or dog skills
training components, and if surfacing is other
than lawn or decomposed granite. This cost will
need to be updated based on the site master plan
and current construction conditions.
Basketball Court
Project Estimate $250,000+1
1 Cost varies based on the scope of a regulation
size court and some limited adjacent seating. This
cost will need to be revised based on what other
improvements are included, such as pathways,
lighting, utilities or additional seating.
Pickleball Courts
Project Estimate–
Restripe Existing
Courts
$30-40,000+1
Project Estimate –
Construct a New
8-Court Complex
$500-600,0002
1 The estimate for “Restripe Existing Courts” is
F-22
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
based on a painted overlay to ~4 existing tennis
courts with surface cleaning and sealing, and
funding for net improvements.
2 The estimate for Construct a new 8-court
complex is based on a ~$50,000/court price. This
assumes courts are clustered with perimeter
fencing. This cost will need to be revised based
on the site master plan; what other improvements
are included beyond the court and some fencing,
such as fencing between courts, site amenities,
lighting, etc.; and current construction conditions.
Community Gardens
Project Estimate $500,0001
1 Cost is for a community garden and is
dependent on the size of the garden area, the
amenities provided, the availability of potable
water, the number of raised beds, etc. This cost
is based on a construction budget of ~$300,000
and would accommodate at-grade beds, some
raised beds, hose bibs, access route, and perimeter
fencing. This cost assumes the creation of a
community garden area in an existing park with
available nearby potable water. A large facility,
such as that at McClellan Ranch, a healing
garden, or demonstration garden would be more
expensive.
Outdoor Recreation Diversity
Providing additional outdoor recreation diversity
has a range of costs from $500 for nets and
standards for badminton to $2,000-5,000 for
outdoor table tennis, chess tables, benches, to
$30,000 for structured parkour (obstacle course)
elements or outdoor fitness equipment and
beyond. Pilot programs could explore a variety
of options including temporary options, outdoor
games like a giant Jenga or portable climbing
wall, to build and test interest. Elements could
rotate through different parks. Other elements
could be permanent to provide a range of small
and larger scale additions to existing amenities,
with a few sites each year receiving something
new to add to their offerings. A yearly allocation
of $100,000 or more would allow for a variety of
new elements to be added at sites throughout the
system to create additional interest and address
the needs of a larger, more diverse population.
Improved Comfort & Amenities in Parks
Providing additional shade, seating, potable
water, signage, lighting, bike racks, art and
restrooms throughout the park system will
provide all users with a higher level of comfort
and interest to each facility. These amenities can
be added incrementally over time with a few
parks receiving comfort improvements each year.
These improvements range in cost with new trees
costing $250 and other amenities costing more.
A yearly allocation of $100,000 would allow a
few parks a year to have a wide range of comfort
improvements customized each park’s specific
needs.
Natural Vegetation Enhancements
Providing natural vegetation enhancements
includes a range of improvements to reduce
manicured areas and provide for natural
systems and habitats. As part of standard
landscape maintenance, underutilized lawn
areas throughout the system could be converted
to native plantings and habitat areas; this will
require a change in maintenance practice but
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
F-23
may reduce the amount of time needed to
maintain the areas. Larger restoration and
habitat enhancements have greater cost but
small, incremental efforts can be pilot programs.
These enhancements can be coordinated with
neighborhood groups and partners to implement
and/or events, such as quarterly invasive plant
removal efforts, can be organized. A yearly
allocation of $100,000 or more would allow for a
variety of these enhancements to be implemented
with ongoing efforts to reduce lawn and water
usage in the landscape, provide more dynamic
and lively habitats throughout the City, as well as
provide visual interest and green infrastructure.
additional information:
existing sites
Some of the initial projects to be included in
the City’s Capital Improvement Program will
be associated with existing park site master
planning and/or improvements. Allowances are
noted below for these site plans and projects.
Memorial Park
Project Estimate $10-13,000,0001
1 The estimate assumes a construction budget of~
$8,000,000 for “phase one” site improvements.
Such improvements include renovation and
repurposing of the pond areas; a new water
feature; renovation of the amphitheater;
improvements to support event hosting;
improvements to the pathway system; landscape
renovation; and infrastructure improvements.
This does not include the development of
new major buildings/”big moves” (such as an
aquatic center or gym) which may or may not
be included in the site; new major buildings
are separately addressed. Costs will need to be
updated based on the site master plan.
Stevens Creek Corridor Park
Costs will need to be identified based on
completion of the Stevens Creek Corridor
Master Plan to accurately reflect that plan’s
implementation.
Creekside, Hoover, Jollyman, Linda Vista, Monta Vista, Portal, Varian and Wilson Parks
Each of these large neighborhood parks is
expected to warrant investment in renovation
and enhancements during the next two decades.
The appropriate budget for each park will
depend upon selected improvements. Strategic
plans and Capital Improvement Programs that
will follow this Master Plan will identify the
parks that are prioritized for near-term attention
and improvement.
Small Neighborhood Parks
For Canyon Oak and Little Rancho Parks, small
scale improvements ranging between $10,000
and $100,000 each will provide additional play
and recreational value and diversity.
For Franco and Sterling Barnhart Parks, these are
the two newest small neighborhood parks and as
such are well designed, in good condition, and
have limited unprogrammed space. Ongoing
maintenance are the main needs with minor
improvements needed when life cycle costs
indicate replacements are needed.
For Somerset and Three Oaks Parks, there is
a need longer term to add recreational value
F-24
OPPORTUNITIES AND COSTS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
and diversify the opportunities. As life-cycle
costs indicate replacements are needed, a wider
variety of play and recreation opportunities
should be infused as well as a reconsideration
of the amount of turf to climate-appropriate
plantings. They are anticipated to warrant
investment that is higher than for small
neighborhood parks but less than for the large
neighborhood parks noted above.
Mary Avenue Dog Park
Similar to Franco and Sterling Barnhart
Parks, the Mary Avenue Dog Park is recently
constructed, well designed, in good condition,
and has limited unprogrammed space. Ongoing
maintenance is the main need with minor
improvements such as additional shade and
seating, possible dog agility/exercise elements,
or replacement of existing facilities at the end of
their life cycle.
Cupertino Sports Center
Cupertino Sports Center major improvements
for long-term needs are directly linked to the
Memorial Park site master plan efforts, and the
results of Public Worker’s Building Condition
and Use Assessment, as well as discussions
regarding major new recreation facilities such
as an aquatic center or gymnasium. Depending
on those discussions, a separate site master
plan may or may not be necessary. Costs for
such major improvements are too conceptual to
address at this juncture.
Trail Corridors
Most existing trails would benefit from
incremental improvements for comfort (such
as shade or added seating), environment (such
as habitat plantings or green infrastructure), or
increased connectivity (such as linkages between
trails, bike corridors, and parks especially).
Comfort and environmental improvements are
lower cost and can be phased in over time for
minimal cost (installing benches, e.g.). Increased
connectivity improvements vary in cost and
are more expensive given their scale and
complexity; these improvements would need to
be coordinated with Public Works.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX F
F-25
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX G
F-27
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES
G
F-28
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX G
G-1
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES
G
introduction
Cupertino relies on a variety of funding
resources to develop and operate its parks
and recreation system. Looking forward, this
Master Plan recommends many system-wide
enhancements, ranging from park renovations
to major new facility development, park
acquisition, and added recreation programs and
events. The City has a strong history of investing
in parks and recreation services. Implementing
the Master Plan will require increasing this
investment, both by maximizing existing funding
sources and identifying new ones. This appendix
reviews funding sources for capital projects and
operations.
Park Acquisition, Development and Renovation Funding
The Master Plan identifies projects that require
land acquisition, park and facility development,
and renovation and enhancement at most parks
in Cupertino. There is considerable flexibility
in the sources that can be used for funding
the acquisition and development of new park
and recreation projects, and some flexibility in
funding park renovations.
Existing Funding Sources
Cupertino’s budget includes several accounts
used for acquisition, development and
renovation projects in Cupertino’s parks and
recreation system. Each source is detailed below
with the fund name(s) that appear in the City’s
budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The
fund description clarifies potential uses for these
funds in implementing future projects.
• General Fund. The General Fund is the
primary fund for governmental services and
has the fewest limitations on uses. While
the General Fund is the City’s main source
of operating funding, several accounts
within the General Fund are used for capital
improvements. The main sources of funding
for Cupertino’s General Fund are the property
and sales taxes collected within City limits,
along with franchise fees and charges for
services. Some fees are collected in special
funds and are not passed through the
General Fund. This includes fees collected for
G-2
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
to be used to acquire new parkland or fund
capital improvements at existing recreation
and park facilities which will serve the new
units. If appropriate land is not available or
the development is less than 50 units, the fair
market value of the required land is collected
as a fee. Cupertino collects in-lieu fees based
on 3 acres of land per 1,000 residents and
deposits them in a special Park Dedication
fund. The amount of the fee is based on a
current appraisal of land value. Revenues
generated through the Park Land Dedication
Fee cannot be used for the operation and
maintenance of park facilities.
•Park Maintenance Fee. Cupertino Municipal
Code (Chapter 14.05) establishes a limited
impact fee targeted at single lot development
(new building on an existing, single parcel
of land). These fees support park acquisition
development, rehabilitation and maintenance
of parks to off-set the impact of declining
open space within the city as lots are
developed. Fees are assessed in a similar
manner to Chapter 13.08, based on the
number of dwelling units, residents per unit
and a park acreage standard of 3 acres per
1,000 people. This fee is limited to financing
the acquisition and maintenance of parks and
recreation facilities.
Capital Improvement Program
Across all departments in the City of Cupertino,
the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
for FY 2019 (adopted in June of 2018) set aside
over $21 million to fund new and existing
projects. A summary of the total existing and
new projects included for funding in the five-
year CIP (fiscal years 2019-2023) is below.
recreation programs, which are captured in an
enterprise fund.
•Capital Improvement Fund (General Fund).
Resources for any type of capital project
can be transferred to this fund, mainly from
the General Fund, at the discretion of City
Council in the budgeting process.
•Capital Reserve (General Fund). The City’s
Capital Reserve is intended to be used for
capital improvement projects in the City.
Funding for this reserve is governed by the
City’s “Assigned and Unassigned Fund
Balance and Use of One Time Funds Policy”,
found in the Financial Policies and Schedules
section of the City’s budget documents. Per
that policy, any unassigned fund balance in
the General Fund at year end over $500,000
will be transferred to the Capital Reserve.
In the 2017-18 fiscal year, this fund’s ending
balance was projected at $13.5 million,
due to a large transfer. The 2018-19 Capital
Improvement Program allocated most these
resources over the next two years.
•Stevens Creek Corridor Park Capital
Projects. This fund pays for the design and
construction of projects within the Stevens
Creek Corridor. This fund was a special
purpose set-aside recognizing the significance
of this set of parks. No ongoing funding is
projected.
•Park Land Dedication/In-Lieu Fees. The
Cupertino Municipal Code (Chapter 13.08)
requires dedication of land or collection
of equivalent fees for park or recreational
purposes as a condition of approval of new
dwelling units. Any land required to be
dedicated and/or fees required to be paid are
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX G
G-3
TABLE G-1: 2019-2023 CITY OF CUPERTINO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM SUMMARY
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
New Projects $8,556,500 $1,960,000 $1,960,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000
Existing Projects $1,885,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000
Total $10,441,500 $2,240,000 $2,240,000 $2,080,000 $2,080,000
Table G-1 shows the magnitude of new projects
funding in the 2019 fiscal year and the planning
for the following four years. Funded projects and
longer-term planning are heavily influenced by
the current development proposals in the city,
which can change within any given year.
The citywide CIP also carried over nearly $27
million in projects that are completely funded.
The new, existing and carried over projects
included the following park and recreation
system items:
•Lawrence-Mitty Park Master Plan
•Sports Center Upgrades
•Stevens Creek Corridor Park Chain Master
Plan - McClellan Rd to Stevens Creek Blvd.
•Memorial Park Master Plan & Parking Study
•Senior Center Repairs
Note: Subsequent action by the City Council on
September 18, 2018 de-funded or deferred a number of
the projects in the approved 5-year CIP.
Potential New Sources and Mechanisms for Capital Projects
There are several potential funding sources for
park and facility capital projects and mechanisms
for land acquisition that Cupertino is not
currently using (but may have in the past).
Combining these sources and mechanism is
a typical strategy when developing complex
projects.
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES
•Expanded Park Impact Fees. A Park Impact
Fee is a funding source that supports
capacity-enhancement projects to support
new residential or commercial growth.
These funds are authorized in Government
Code §66000- 66025 (the "Mitigation Fee
Act"), the bulk of which was adopted as
1987's Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 and thus
are commonly referred to as "AB 1600
requirements." Currently, the City relies
primarily on Municipal Code Chapter 13.08
Park Land Dedication Fee (described above),
Chapter 18.24 Dedications and Reservations,
and Chapter 14.05 Park Maintenance Fee to
acquire and pay for new parks related to new
development. The City can apply impact
fees to residential, commercial or industrial
development, if each has a measurable
connection (or nexus) to increased park
use. To establish this connection for non-
residential development, pre-nexus and
nexus studies with positive results would be
required to establish impact fees for parks.
G-4
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
• General Obligation Bond. The City has
the authority to request voter approval for
general obligation bonds to finance the
construction of improvements to the park
system with a time-limited property tax
increase. Requirements for a high threshold of
approval (two-thirds of voters) makes general
obligation bond tax measures challenging
to pass, but the time-limited nature of these
measures (the tax expires when the bonds
are paid off) improves public perception in
many cases. General Obligation bonds can
only be used for capital improvements, not
maintenance and operations.
• Grants. There are a variety of public and
private granting agencies that fund park
and recreation projects, each with its own
priorities that dictate the types of projects that
are eligible. These sources range from public
agencies supporting environmental and water
quality restoration to private foundations
looking to improve health outcomes. In most
cases, grant funds require a local contribution
to the project and include specific project
reporting protocols. For the City to
proactively identify grant opportunities,
dedicated staff time is needed for identifying,
tracking, applying for and managing the
grant process. While it is possible for a
grant to cover programming or operational
expenses, it is very uncommon, and grants
should mainly be considered a capital
funding source. Of statewide significance,
the recent Parks, Environment and Water
Bond (Proposition 68) passed in June of
2018 includes $725 million in competitive
grants specifically targeted at “park-poor
neighborhoods.” These funds will be awarded
via the statewide competitive grants program.
• Assessment District. An assessment district
is a mechanism that allows cities to assess
housing units or land parcels to maintain
and improve street lighting, landscaping
and parks that provide a special benefit to
designated areas. Assessment districts help
each property owner pay a fair share of the
costs of such improvements over a period
of years at reasonable interest rates. This
ensures that the cost will be spread to all
properties that receive direct and special
benefit from the improvements constructed.
Establishment of a new district or revision
to an existing district requires a majority
vote of the property owners. Landscape and
Lighting Assessment Districts (LLADs) are
used by California cities to fund park capital
improvements and operations. The City of
Cupertino does not currently have any special
districts that fund parks and recreation
improvements or operations. However,
the Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park
District is an independent special district in
east Cupertino that owns and operates the
Rancho Rinconada pool and recreation center
which serves residents of the area.
• Community Facilities District. The Mello-
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
allows any county, city, special district,
school district or joint powers authority
to establish a Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District (“CFD”) to finance public
improvements and services. The services
and improvements that Mello-Roos CFDs
can finance include parks, as well as streets,
sewer systems and other basic infrastructure,
police protection, fire protection, ambulance
services, schools, libraries, museums and
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX G
G-5
other cultural facilities. Formation of a
CFD requires a two-thirds vote of residents
living within the proposed boundaries.
If there are fewer than 12 residents, then
the vote is instead conducted of current
landowners. The assessment cannot be based
on property value; instead, it is based on
the size of the property or square footage of
structures. By law, the CFD is also entitled
to recover expenses needed to form the CFD
and administer the annual special taxes
and bonded debt. The special assessment
continues until bonds are paid off and then
is typically reduced to a level to maintain the
investments. The ongoing component of a
CFD makes it useful for major facilities that
typically require an ongoing investment in
operations. Cupertino does not currently have
any CFDs for parks and recreation facilities.
•Parcel Tax. A parcel tax is levied on each
parcel, and the tax rate may vary based on
features of each property other than the
property value. Similar to general obligation
bonds, parcel taxes require a two-thirds
vote of the community. However, parcel
taxes offer flexibility in funding both capital
and operations, and do not expire unless
established with a sunset clause. The mix
of funding is typically stated in the ballot
measure and is fixed for the life of the tax.
In the case of the 2016 Los Angeles County
parks funding measure, the tax was based
on the improved square footage of each
property. A parcel tax can also be based on
the number of dwelling units or a flat rate
per parcel. If Cupertino were interested
in exploring community interest in voter-
approved funding mechanisms, the feasibility
of a parcel tax should be included in the
investigation.
•Community Benefits Agreement. Real
estate developers can negotiate directly with
communities (or a coalition of interests)
and sign a contract known as a Community
Benefit Agreement (CBA) promising to
deliver specific amenities or mitigations to the
local community. In exchange, the community
group commits to support (or at least not
oppose) the project. The benefits could
include either park land or built features.
•Public–Private Partnerships. Partnerships
are formal agreements between multiple
entities (often a public agency and either a
community-based organization or private
enterprise) to provide services, facilities, or
both. These partnerships are built to access
skills and resources from all partners. While
the public-private variation attracts the most
attention, many public-public and non-profit
partnerships have greatly benefited park and
recreation systems.
LAND ACQUISITION MECHANISMS
Cupertino has very little land available for park
system expansion. When land can be purchased,
the cost is high (valued in 2018 at $10,000,000
per acre). There are a variety of mechanisms to
explore for park land acquisition.
•Direct Purchase or Fee Simple Acquisition.
Direct purchase is the most customary means
of acquiring park land in most communities.
In many cases, a public agency purchases real
property from a willing seller at fair market
value. A fee simple purchase transfers full
ownership of the property, including the
underlying title, to another party. Most of
Cupertino’s park land has been acquired
through fee simple acquisition.
G-6
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
• Easement. An easement is a partial interest
in real property. Easements are especially
applicable in situations where the landowner
is not interested in selling their land but is
willing to place an easement on the property
to dedicate the land for a specific purpose,
in this case typically for park, recreation,
conservation or trail purposes. The terms
of an easement agreement are negotiated
between the private landowner and the public
agency to tailor the easement to needs of each
party. Easements may be acquired by direct
purchase or by donation. In park systems,
easements are most typically seen for trail
connections or for conservation purposes.
Easements may be suitable for planned trail
corridors where outright property acquisition
is not desirable or feasible.
• Real Property Donations. A willing property
owner may give real property or grant an
easement as a donation to a public agency or
a non-profit organization. In some cases, a
property owner may agree to sell the property
at less than fair market value. The property
owner is paid for part of the value of the
property and donates the remaining value,
receiving tax benefits for the donation. To
maximize the benefit (and attractiveness)
of this mechanism, Cupertino would need
a non-profit entity to accept the donation
and provide the tax receipt. This could be a
parks-specific or community foundation. The
Trust for Public Land, land trusts and other
organizations may also be able to play this
role.
• Life Estate. In some cases, a property owner
may donate or sell real property to a public
agency but retain a life estate, through which
they retain the right to use the property for
the duration of their life.
• Land Swap. A land swap is a simultaneous,
mutual transfer of real property between
willing parties.
• Long Term Lease. A lease is a legal agreement
granting the use of a property in exchange for
payment for a specified length of time. For
parks and recreation purposes, the payment
may be nominal (e.g., $1 per year) and the
term is often long (such as 99 years).
• Property Dedication. Dedication of real estate
is a required donation of real property to a
government for a public purpose, typically
resulting from a land use or entitlement
process. For example, cities sometimes require
a property owner to dedicate right-of-way
to widen a street or park land as part of a
subdivision process.
• Conditions of Approval. Public agencies
can require public use in some cases as a
condition of approval of a land use action.
Sometimes, public use is provided through
dedication or easement to a public agency,
and sometimes the private property owner
retains ownership but must provide public
access. San Francisco’s Privately Owned
Public Open Spaces are an example of this.
• Land Trust. A land trust is an agreement
through which one party (the trustee) agrees
to hold ownership of a piece of property for
the benefit of another party (the beneficiary).
A land trust can also be a private nonprofit
organization that as all or part of its mission
actively works to protect land, often for
conservation or affordable housing purposes.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX G
G-7
• Community Benefits Agreement. As noted,
real estate developers can negotiate directly
with communities (or a coalition of interests)
and sign a contract known as a Community
Benefit Agreement (CBA) promising to
deliver specific amenities or mitigations to
the local community, which can include park
land.
operating funds
In addition to funds for capital projects, the
City of Cupertino will need additional funds to
maintain, operate, program and manage parks,
facilities, programs and events. The City of
Cupertino budgeted over $22 million in 2018-19
to provide parks and recreation services for the
community, not including capital improvements.
This includes $17,442,432 in funds tied to
Recreation and Community Services. Along with
another $4,530,150 for grounds maintenance
(within the Public Works Department’s budget).
Existing Sources of Operating Funding
Cupertino’s parks and recreation services are
funded primarily through city taxes and user
fees for facilities and programs. User fees include
everything from facility rentals to program fees.
A comprehensive fee schedule is updated and
adopted each year by resolution of the City
Council.
The City’s budget includes funds for park and
recreation operations in several accounts:
GENERAL FUND
• General Fund. Resources for the Recreation
and Community Services Department are
primarily from the General Fund. Funding
for the maintenance of parks and recreation
facilities is also designated from the General
Fund to the Public Works Department. The
General Fund, the City’s primary source
of operating funding, is a limited pool of
resources that funds all City services, not just
parks and recreation.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
• Blackberry Farm Golf Course Fund. This
fund pays for operating costs related to the
Blackberry Farm Golf Course. Revenues
are collected as fees from users of the golf
course. While Blackberry Farm generates a
substantial number of users and user fees, this
fund is only for golf course operations.
• Sports Center Fund. This fund pays for
operating costs related to the Sports Center.
Revenues are collected as fees from users of
the Sports Center.
• Recreation Programs Fund. This fund pays
for operating costs related to the City’s
community centers and park facilities.
Revenues are collected as fees for recreation
programs at the City’s community centers
and park facilities.
Potential Expanded and New Sources for Operations and Services
There are fewer sources of operating funding
available for parks and recreation services, and
securing ongoing sources committed to parks
and recreation will be challenging. Options to
expand existing sources of operations funding
and identify new sources are noted below.
G-8
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
• Increased General Fund Support. The
Recreation & Community Services
Department could make a case to increase
General Fund support for parks maintenance,
programming and events. The City could
make the case for increasing General Fund
support in a variety of ways. First, park and
facility maintenance needs will increase
as new project are brought online. Second,
community priorities for enhanced recreation
opportunities and programming services
were noted in outreach activities. Third,
there are many citywide benefits associated
with parks and programs. For example, the
health benefits of parks, trails, recreation
programming and natural spaces provide
a substantial (although indirect) financial
benefit in the off-setting of public and private
health care costs. The proper maintenance of
park sites has been shown to maintain and
increase surrounding property values, one
of the tax bases that the General Fund relies
on. Further, the attraction value of park and
recreation events and programming draw
visitors who support the sales tax base. Park
lands and recreation services also reduce
the cost of other critical City services, such
as water retention/treatment and crime
prevention.
It is possible, though not necessarily simple,
to increase General Fund support for parks
and recreation services through lesser known
mechanisms, including the following.
• Utility User Tax (UUT). California cities
can, with voter approval, levy a tax on
utilities such as electricity, gas, water, sewer,
telephone (including cell phones and long-
distance services), sanitation, and cable
television. The rate of the tax and the use
of revenues is determined by the City. The
revenues are most often used for essential
services, including police, fire, streets, and
parks. Cupertino currently levies 2.4% on
telecommunications, electricity and gas. This
falls in the low range for California cities with
UUTs (average is around 5%). Majority voter
approval is needed to increase an established
UUT. Expanded UUTs could expand the
resources to the General Fund, potentially
allowing more non-UUT funds to be allocated
to parks and recreation.
• Hotel Tax (Transient Occupancy Tax). Taxes
on people staying less than 30 days in a city
help support public services and facilities
that make an area a good destination for
business or vacation travel. Many cities use
Hotel Taxes to pay for park improvements.
In 2011, Cupertino increased the hotel tax
from 10% to 12% to ensure funding for
general city services, including library
services, neighborhood police patrols, rapid
9-1-1 emergency response times, city street
maintenance, current levels of police officers
and school traffic safety and crossing guards.
Parks and recreation services do not receive
TOT funds at this time.
• Increased Enterprise Fund Revenues. The
City of Cupertino uses three enterprise funds
to track the revenues and expenditures
associated with key areas of service
(Blackberry Farm Golf Course, the Sports
Center and Recreation Programs). Additional
resources could be generated within these
funds by increasing fees or adding revenue
generating services and concessions.
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX G
G-9
• Expanded User Fees. Currently, over $6
million is generated from charges for services
(user fees) in the Recreation and Community
Services budget. Some of these fees are
accrued to one of the three enterprise funds,
but some are accrued to the Recreation and
Community Services General Fund budget.
This Master Plan recommends defining a fee
philosophy, methodology and cost recovery
goals for fees and charges for programs and
services, as well as re-evaluating options
for park and facility rentals to improve
customer service but also generate more
revenues. While some programs benefit only
individuals and some services are premiums
on top of the essential park and recreation
experience, price increases across the board
can limit access to key community services
and reduce use of parks and programming.
• Assessment District. As previously described,
an assessment district is a mechanism that
allows cities to assess housing units or land
parcels for amenities that provide a special
benefit to designated areas. A Landscape
and Lighting Assessment District can fund
operations as well as capital improvements.
• Community Facilities District. CFD’s are
described in the capital section above. One of
the important features of a CFD is the ability
to designate a portion of the funding for
operations and maintenance of facilities.
• Parcel Tax. The details of parcel taxes are
included in the capital section. Like some
other special taxes, a portion of the revenue
can be designated for operational purposes.
It is important to note that parcel taxes do
not necessarily include an expiration date but
often do to increase the appeal to voters.
• Operating Levy. Cities can levy additional
taxes (primarily sales taxes) to fund
operations and can choose to target these
requests to specific areas or programs. As
with other special taxes in California, a super-
majority (2/3rds of voters) is required to pass
the measure. The high standard of approval
has limited this method to only the most
popular of purposes.
• Public–Private Partnerships. Some
partnerships have strong potential for
operating parks and recreation facilities and
services. Many cities have partnered with
non-profit organizations, such as the YMCA,
to operate facilities on city-owned land.
Other types of partner entities can take on
management of an entire site or program,
such as Cupertino’s relationship with
Audubon at McClellan Ranch Preserve.
• Sponsorships. The City may solicit sponsors
who are willing to pay for advertising,
signage, facility naming rights, etc.,
generating funds to support operations. In
addition, sponsors are often sought to support
a particular event or program, such as a
concert or movie series.
• Concessions. Food, beverage and
merchandise vendors or concessionaires that
operate restaurants, coffee kiosks, rentals of
equipment (such as bicycles or games) or
provide other revenue-generating facilities
or services in parks can also generate excess
revenues to support the park system. The
City can establish contracts with vendors and
concessionaires for these services. In some
cases, concessions can generate revenue for
the agency.
G-10
POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOLS
H
G-12
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOLS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX H
H-1
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOLS
H
introduction
The Master Plan recommends a number of park
site and system enhancements that are intended to
be implemented through approximately the year
2040. The City of Cupertino will prioritize projects
as part of its annual process to update the Capital
Improvement Program. Since recommended
projects may evolve and new project ideas may
arise during the years to come, this document
provides tools and guidance to assist in prioritizing
capital projects.
tool: goal and community
priority alignment checklist
The Goal and Community Priority Alignment
Checklist allows the City to evaluate new projects
to determine if they are consistent with the
direction of the Master Plan.
Alignment with Master Plan Goals
The project in consideration must be clearly
aligned with at least one of the following Master
Plan goals. If multiple goals are addressed, the
project more strongly supports the direction of this
master plan.
Does the project:
□Protect nature, trees and natural areas in parks
and throughout the city to support wildlife,
ecological functions and a stronger connection
to Cupertino’s natural environment?
□Create a walkable, bikeable and accessible city
by providing an interconnected network of
multi-use trails, walkways and bikeways, close-
to-home parks, and community destinations?
□Distribute parks, facilities and recreation
opportunities throughout the community for
easy and equitable access?
□Reinvigorate and revitalize parks and recreation
facilities and offerings to support broad and
inclusive recreation interests?
□Support social gatherings, events, programs
and activities for people of all ages, abilities,
cultures, and interests?
H-2
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOLS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
□Create high quality recreation experiences,
places and services that are welcoming,
responsive, comfortable and reflective of
Cupertino’s unique character?
□Provide, manage and maintain high-quality
parks, recreation facilities, programs and
services for Cupertino residents through
sound management and stewardship,
sustainable choices and wise use of resources?
____ Total Goals Addressed
Alignment with Community Priorities
The following checklist includes twelve key
priorities that emerged from Master Plan
community outreach. The project in consideration
should be clearly aligned with at least one of the
following key priorities. If multiple priorities
are addressed, the project strongly supports the
direction of this master plan.
Does the project:
□Protect nature or support nature experiences?
□Provide improved connectivity or trail
opportunities?
□Support park and facility access (geographic,
ADA, bike/pedestrian entry)?
□Increase the variety and diversity of recreation
options?
□Support social gatherings, special events or
celebrations?
□Provide unique or extraordinary play
opportunities?
□Empower teens or youth?
□Reflect Cupertino’s unique character and
identity?
□Improve user comfort, increase ease of use or
create welcoming places and services?
□Support the Arts in our community?
□Promote partnerships?
□Support diverse cultural interests?
____ Total Priorities Addressed
tool: sequencing criteria &
evaluation
Instructions: Evaluate the project on a 4-point
scale of 0 to 3 points for each criterion, where
completely meets = 3 points; partially meets = 2
points; somewhat meets = 1 point; and not at all
meets = 0 points. Certain criteria that are critical
for advancing the project are proposed to be
weighted (e.g., have their rated score multiplied
by 2).
cupertino parks and recreation system master plan | APPENDIX H
H-3
Criteria Score 1 Critical
Criteria
Total
Alignment with Park and Recreation System Needs: Does the project address any of the following identified
system needs?
Repair/Improvement: Repair or improve
an existing site, asset or natural resource?
Access/Connectivity: Improve
pedestrian/ bicycle connectivity, access
to an existing destination, or extend the
trail network?
Service Level: Improve service to
residents and users, or improve the ability
to provide high-quality service?
Available Space: Be implemented using
existing park space or available space?
X 2
Multiple/Flexible Use: Support multiple or
flexible uses?
New Service or Opportunity: Provide
an opportunity or service not already
available (e.g., meet an unmet need,
address a gap in services)?
Equity: Serve an underserved group or
underserved geographic area?
Age: Provide improved service to teens/
youth or to seniors?
Distribution: Improve the balance and
distribution of amenities in the system?
Usership: Benefit a large number of
residents?
Sustainability & Efficiency: Increase
sustainability, reduce costs or increase
maintenance and operational
efficiencies?
Resource Use: Use or leverage available
resources (staffing, funding, partnerships,
equipment)?
H-4
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOLS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
Criteria Score 1 Critical
Criteria
Total
Financial Strength: If for an enterprise
facility, increase the financial viability or
sustainability of the facility?
Safety and Use: Does it repair or replace
deficient or non-functioning amenities
and facilities to improve safety or restore
use?
X2
Diversity: Does the project diversify
recreation opportunities for people
of different ages, ethnicities and/or
cultures?
City Priority: Does the project coincide
with or support another City project, goal
or City Council initiative?
Timing: Does action need to be taken
now before the opportunity is lost? Is
project completion needed before
another priority project can be started?
X 2
Staffing/Operations: Are staff and
resources available to operate and
maintain the site/facility?
X 2
Funding Availability: Is funding available
for the project in the proposed time
frame?
X 2
Outside Funding/Partnerships: Does the
project significantly leverage outside
resources?
Ease of Implementation: Can the project
be done quickly and easily? Have the
necessary advanced planning, feasibility
studies and permitting already been
completed?
Public Support: Is there public support for
the project?
Value: Does the project deliver high
value for the cost or resources needed
relative to other projects?
1 completely meets = 3 points; partially meets = 2 points; somewhat meets = 1 point; not at all meets = 0 points
H-6
PROJECT PRIORITIZATION TOOLS | cupertino parks and recreation system master plan
10300 Torre Ave,
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3200
cupertinogpa.org
PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM
MASTER PLAN
OCTOBER 2019
INITIAL STUDY /
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF CUPERTINO
City of Cupertino
Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
October 2019
Page 1
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Cupertino
Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project
Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration
Project: City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Lead Agency: City of Cupertino
Project Proponent: City of Cupertino
Availability of Documents: The Initial Study for this Mitigated Negative Declaration is available
for review at:
Contact:
City of Cupertino, City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager
City of Cupertino
Department of Public Works
Email: parksmp@cupertino.org
(408) 777-3120
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City proposes to adopt and implement the City of Cupertino (City) Parks and Recreation
System Master Plan (Master Plan) which identifies opportunities for park improvements and
development and is needed to provide guidance for long-term decision making by City staff.
The Master Plan is intended to ensure that the City’s park and recreation system meets the
needs of the Cupertino community, and to guide the City in allocating resources for future
development, renovation, and management of City park and recreation facilities, through the
year 2040. The key components of the Master Plan are vision and goals, systemwide objectives
and actions, enhancement opportunities, and associated implementation actions. The Master
Plan is focused on City owned or managed developed parks and recreation facilities in
Cupertino, and does not cover non-City owned natural open spaces, or other non-City owned
assets such as county and regional parks.
PROPOSED FINDINGS
The City of Cupertino has reviewed the attached Initial Study and determined that the Initial
Study identifies potentially significant project effects, but that:
1.Revisions to the project plans, identified herein as mitigation, would avoid or mitigate the
effects to a point where no significant effects would occur; and
2.There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the
project may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, pursuant to
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15064(f)(2) and
15070(b), a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for consideration as the
appropriate CEQA document for the project.
BASIS OF FINDINGS
Based on the environmental evaluation presented in the attached Initial Study, the project would
not cause significant adverse effects related to Agricultural/Forestry, Air Quality, Energy,
Geology/Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use/Planning,
Mineral Resources, Noise, Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation,
Page 2
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Utilities, and Wildfire. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable.
The project would have potentially significant impacts to aesthetics (light and glare), biological,
cultural and tribal resources and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project to
reduce these impacts to less than significant levels.
Mitigation Measures
The project could result in significant adverse effects to aesthetic, biological, cultural, and tribal
resources. However, the project has been revised to include the mitigation measures listed
below, which reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. With implementation of these
mitigation measures, the project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Nor would the project
cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly.
MITIGATION MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT:
Impact AES -1: Park projects that include night lighting could cause light and glare impacts to
sensitive adjacent land uses.
Mitigation Measure AES -1: New exterior lighting in proximity to adjacent property will be
shielded as necessary to ensure that exterior light sources do not create a significant light or
glare impact on an adjacent land use. A lighting plan that addresses potential light and glare
impacts shall be prepared for projects that include new night lighting in proximity to adjacent
private properties.
Impact BIO-1: Future park projects could impact special-status species, sensitive communities,
wetlands and wildlife corridors, as defined by state and federal law.
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: The Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) for Parks and
Recreation improvements shall be reviewed annually by staff to identify projects that could
potentially affect special-status species, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, wildlife
corridors, and/or native wildlife nursery sites. Any such projects shall be reviewed by a
professional in field biology. The biological professional shall:
a) Research the potential occurrence of special-status species and sensitive communities in the
areas affected by CIP projects by reviewing the California Natural Diversity Database, California
Native Plant Society Inventory, IPaC, or other appropriate databases, by contacting resource
agencies such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and/or
NOAA Fisheries Service, or other appropriate methods.
b) For each CIP project approved for funding that could impact special-status species, sensitive
natural communities, wetlands, wildlife corridors, and/or nursery sites during construction or as
a result of the proposed use, including maintenance, prior to the start of construction identify all
resource agency permits required for the project and ensure that the project is modified as
necessary to minimize effects on biological resources and avoid impacts.
c) For each CIP project that could have a significant impact on special-status species, sensitive
natural communities, wetlands, wildlife corridors, and/or nursery sites, specify measures to
avoid impacts or to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level that will be implemented as
part of the project. Indicate the timing of when the measures would be implemented (e.g., prior
to construction activities, during construction, post-construction etc.). These measures may
include actions such as the following currently accepted measures:
Page 3
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
1.Pre-construction surveys for special-status plant and animal species, nesting birds, and
roosting bats in the correct season and using CNPS, CDFW and/or other accepted
protocols, as appropriate, to identify if the species are present and would be impacted by
the project.
2.Wildlife exclusion fencing to prevent species, such as protected amphibians and reptiles,
from entering the work site. Regular fence inspections to assure that species are not
trapped and to maintain the integrity of the fence.
3.Clear delineation of the work area and/or protected areas in the field to prevent
construction activities from extending beyond required work areas and into nearby
natural areas that contain sensitive species habitat or sensitive natural communities or
wetlands. Environmentally sensitive areas may also be delineated on construction
drawings for certain projects.
4.Silt fencing or other erosion control measures to protect water quality downstream of the
project and the biological resources that rely on suitable water quality.
5.Worker environmental awareness training provided by a qualified professional (typically
a biologist) prior to the start of any project activities that affect the physical environment
to educate workers about the presence of environmentally sensitive areas, what species
may be present, what laws protect the species, and what to do if a special-status
species is encountered.
6.Construction site sanitation to dispose of food and beverage waste and associated
wrappers or containers to minimize site attractiveness to wildlife during construction.
7.Wildlife protection measures, such as minimizing the use of monofilament netting which
can ensnare reptiles and amphibians, covering trenches near suitable habitat so that
species are not trapped and unable to hide from a predator, and/or daily pre-construction
sweeps to verify special-status species are not present in the work area.
8.Actions to take if special-status species are discovered, such as establishment of buffer
zones or other measures acceptable to resource agencies to protect the individual
species.
Impact CULT-1: Park projects involving ground moving activity below the existing topsoil layer
may disturb unknown prehistoric or historic cultural resources, during project construction.
Mitigation Measure CULT-1: Upon discovery of possible buried prehistoric or historic cultural
materials, work within 25 feet of the find must be halted and the City must be notified. The City
shall retain a qualified archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards to review and evaluate the find. Construction work shall not begin
again until the archaeological or cultural resources consultant has been allowed to examine the
cultural materials, assess their significance, and offer proposals for any additional exploratory
measures deemed necessary for the further evaluation of, and/or mitigation of adverse impacts
to, any potential prehistorical or historical resources or unique archaeological resources that
have been exposed.
If the discovery is determined to be a unique archaeological or historical resource, and if
avoidance of the resource is not possible, the archaeologist shall inform the City of the
necessary plans for treatment of the find(s) and mitigation of impacts. The City shall ensure that
the treatment program is completed. The work shall be performed by the archaeologist and shall
result in a detailed technical report that shall be filed with the Northwest Information Center,
Sonoma State University. Construction in the immediate vicinity of the find shall not
recommence until treatment has been completed.
Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.98 of the Public
Resources Code of the State of California, in the event of the discovery of human remains
during construction, there will be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains. The County Medical Examiner/Coroner
Page 4
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
will be notified and will determine whether the remains are Native American. If the Coroner
determines the remains are Native American and are not subject to his or her authority, he or
she will notify the California Native American Heritage Commission, which will attempt to identify
descendants of the deceased Native American(s).
In anticipation of additional discoveries during construction, Archaeological Sensitivity Training
shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist for all personnel who will engage in ground
moving activities on the site prior to resuming construction.
If a newly discovered resource is, or is suspected to be, Native American in origin, the resource
shall be treated as a significant Tribal Cultural Resource, pursuant to Public Resource Code
21074, until the County has determined otherwise with the consultation of a qualified
archaeologist.
The City shall coordinate with the archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for
any resources that are discovered. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data
recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis. If appropriate, the archaeologist may introduce archaeological
monitoring on all or part of the site. An archaeological report shall be written detailing all
archaeological finds and submitted to the City and the Northwest Information Center.
The City shall ensure that the appropriate construction conditions are included in any contract
that has the potential for ground disturbing operations. All excavation contracts for the project
shall contain provisions for stopping work in the vicinity of a find exposing archaeological
resources during subsurface construction.
Table of Contents Page i
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
CUPERTINO PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
INITIAL STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Purpose of CEQA .............................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Potential Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................... 2
1.4 Lead Agency Name and Address ...................................................................................... 2
1.5 Contact Person and Phone Number .................................................................................. 2
1.6 Document Organization ..................................................................................................... 2
Chapter 2. Project Description .............................................................................................. 5
2.1 Project Background & Objective ........................................................................................ 5
2.2 Project Location................................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Land Uses and Setting .....................................................................................................16
2.4 Land Use Designations ....................................................................................................17
2.5 Zoning District ..................................................................................................................17
2.6 Project Characteristics......................................................................................................17
2.7 Scope of CEQA Review ...................................................................................................38
2.8 Public Agencies Approval Required..................................................................................39
2.9 Cupertino Standard Design and Construction MEASURES ..............................................39
Chapter 3. Environmental Checklist and Responses ...........................................................43
3.1 Aesthetics.........................................................................................................................47
3.2 Agricultural and Forest Resources ...................................................................................69
3.3 Air Quality.........................................................................................................................71
3.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................85
3.5 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................... 107
3.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................ 117
3.7 Geology and Soils .......................................................................................................... 122
3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................... 132
3.9 Hazards and Hazardous MAterials ................................................................................. 139
3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .......................................................................................... 150
3.11 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................. 161
3.12 Mineral Resources ......................................................................................................... 166
3.13 Noise .............................................................................................................................. 168
3.14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................. 182
3.15 Public Sevices ................................................................................................................ 183
Table of Contents Page ii
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.16 Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 190
3.17 Transportation ................................................................................................................ 195
3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... 204
3.19 Utilities and Service Systems ......................................................................................... 209
3.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................... 217
3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................................ 222
Chapter 4. References ...................................................................................................... 225
Chapter 5. List of Preparers .............................................................................................. 233
TABLES
Table 2-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities ................................................................. 9
Table 2-2: Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Actions
with the Potential to Have Environmental Effects ......................................................................18
Table 2-3: Site Opportunities - Existing City Parks & School Fields Managed by City ...............27
Table 2-4 New Park & Recreation Facility Matrix * ....................................................................32
Table 2-5 City of Cupertino Park Design and Construction Standards ......................................39
Table 3-1: Potentially Applicable BAAQMD Rules and Regulations ..........................................73
Table 3-2: BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan Control Measure Sectors .........................................77
Table 3-3: BAAQMD Construction and Operational Screening Criteria for Park Land Use ........82
Table 3-4 Parks/Recreation Facilities Containing or Adjacent to Historic Resources ............... 109
Table 3-5 Cortese Sites in Proximity of Parks and Recreational Facilities ............................... 140
Table 3-6: Caltrans’ Vibration Threshold Criteria for Building Damage .................................... 172
Table 3-7: Caltrans’ Vibration Threshold Criteria for Human Response .................................. 172
Table 3-8: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments .................................. 173
Table 3-9: Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels...................................................... 174
Table 3-10: Brief Daytime Noise Incident Levels ..................................................................... 174
Table 3-11:Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels (dBA) ............................................. 177
Table 3-12:Typical Equipment Groundborne Vibration Levels ................................................. 180
FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Regional Location .................................................................................................... 6
Figure 2-2: Existing Parks Open Space and Recreation Resources from Master Plan ............... 7
Figure 3.7-1: Geological Hazards ............................................................................................ 124
Figure 3.20-1 Fire Hazard Severity Zones ............................................................................... 218
Table of Contents Page iii
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Master Plan Appendix F Opportunities Tables
Appendix B. Sensitive Habitats and Special Status Species
Appendix C. Historic Resources within Cupertino
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page iv
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
Acronym / Symbol Full Phrase or Description
AB Assembly Bill
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
ACM Asbestos-Containing Materials
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
AG Agriculture
ALUC Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers
BA Public Building
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BGS Below Ground Surface
BL Buildings
BMP Best Management Practices
BP Before Present
BTU British Thermal Units
C&D Construction and Demolition
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Cal Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Cal OES California Office of Emergency Services
CAL OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Cal Water California Water Service Company
CalARP California Accidental Release Prevention
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CBSC California Building Standards Commission
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CERT Community Emergency Response Team
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page v
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Acronym / Symbol Full Phrase or Description
CESA California Endangered Species Act
CFC California Fire Code
CFP California Fully Protected
CGS California Geological Survey
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
City City of Cupertino
CLPPA Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Acts
CLUP Comprehensive Land Use Plan
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
CNPS California Native Plant Society
CO Carbon Monoxide
CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
CRLF California Red-Legged Frog
CSC Clean, Safe Creeks and Natural Flood Protection Plan
CSD Cupertino Sanitary District
CSSC California Species of Special Concern
CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency
CUSD Cupertino Union School District
CVP Central Valley Project
CWA Clean Water Act
dBA A-Weighted Sound Level
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DPS Distinct Population Segment
DSOD Division of Safety of Dams
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EN Energy
EOC Emergency Operations Center
EOP Emergency Operations Plan
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page vi
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Acronym / Symbol Full Phrase or Description
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FESA Federal Endangered Species Act
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
FUHSD Fremont Union High School District
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GWh Gigawatt Hours
H&SC California Health and Safety Code
H2S Hydrogen Sulfide
HAP Hazardous Air Pollutants
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HFHSZ High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
HFSZ High Fire Severity Zone
HMBP Hazardous Materials Business Plan
HMCD Hazardous Materials Compliance Division
HOV High-Occupancy Vehicle
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
IS Initial Study
IWM Integrated Waste Management
kWh Kilowatt Hours
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
LHMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
LID Low Impact Development
LOP Local Oversight Program
LOS Levels of Service
LRA Local Responsibility Area
LSAA Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement
Master Plan Cupertino Parks and Recreation Systemwide Master Plan
MBTA Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MGD Million Gallons per Day
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
MPOs Metropolitan Planning Organizations
MROSD Mid-Peninsula Open Space District
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page vii
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Acronym / Symbol Full Phrase or Description
MRP Medical Removal Protection
MRP Municipal Regional Permit
MRP Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit
MS4s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheets
MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission
MTCO2e Million Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalents
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plant
ND Negative Declaration
NFIP National Flood Insurance Program
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NIMS National Incident Management System
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NOI Notice of Intent
NOx Oxides of Nitrogen
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPPA California Native Plant Protection Act
NPS Non-Point Source
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
NW Natural and Working Lands
O3 Ozone
OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
OES Office of Emergency Services
OHP Office of Historic Preservation
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
P Parks and Open Space
P(BA) Planned Development – Public Building
P(Res) Planned Development – Residential
Pb Lead
PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl
PELs Permissible Exposure Limits
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page viii
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Acronym / Symbol Full Phrase or Description
PF Public Facility
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company
PM Particulate Matter
PM10 Inhalable Coarse Particulate Matter
PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter
POTWs Publicly Owned Treatment Works
PPV Peak Particle Velocity
PR Park and Recreation
PRC Public Resources Code
PTP Pedestrian Transportation Plan
R1 Single-Family Residential
RC Riparian Corridor
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
ROG Reactive Organic Gases
RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SB Senate Bill
SCCFD Santa Clara County Fire Department
SCUSD Santa Clara Unified School District
SCVHP Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan
SCVURPPP Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District
SDC Seismic Design Category
SFBAAB San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
SFPUC San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer
SJ/SC WPCP San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant
SL Super Greenhouse Gasses
SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SOx Oxides of Sulfur
SR State Route
SRA State Responsibility Area
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page ix
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Acronym / Symbol Full Phrase or Description
SS Stationary Sources
SV 2.0 Silicon Valley 2.0
SVCE Silicon Valley Clean Energy
SWP State Water Project
SWPCP Sunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC Toxic Air Contaminants
TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load
T Transportation
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
US United States
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
USTs Underground Storage Tanks
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones
VHFSZ Very High Fire Severity Zone
VLD Very Low Density
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VTA Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
WA Waste
WPCP Water Pollution Control Plant
WPT Western Pond Turtle
WR Water
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Page x
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page left blank intentionally
Introduction Page 1
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Chapter 1. Introduction
1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Cupertino (City) proposes to adopt and implement the City of Cupertino Parks and
Recreation System Master Plan (Master Plan). The Master Plan is needed to provide guidance for
long-term decision making by the City and identify priorities for park improvements and development.
The Master Plan is intended to ensure that the City parks and recreation system meets the needs of
the Cupertino community, and to guide the City in allocating resources for future development,
renovation, and management of City parks and recreation facilities, and trails through the year 2040.
The Master Plan pertains to City owned or managed developed parks, facilities, and recreation
programming in Cupertino, and does not cover non-City owned natural open spaces, or non-City
owned assets such as county and regional parks. The Master Plan does identify enhancement
opportunities for joint City/School District improvements to school district facilities, primarily sport
playing fields that are covered by an existing City-School District agreement. Any future projects
conducted at school district owned facilities would be reviewed by the school district to evaluate the
appropriate level of CEQA determination required for the project.
The Master Plan incorporates relevant data and policies from the City’s Community Vision 2040
General Plan (General Plan), 2015 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (2015), Bicycle
Transportation Plan (2016) and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018).
The City is the lead agency for the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Master Plan. This
IS/MND has been prepared to comply with Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which sets
forth the following required contents of an Initial Study:
• A description of the major elements of the project (see Chapter 2).
• Identification of the environmental setting (see Chapter 3).
• Identification of environmental effects (see Chapter 3).
• Discussion of ways to mitigate potentially significant effects identified, if any (see Chapter 3).
• Examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other
applicable land use controls (see Chapter 3).
• The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study
(see Chapter 4).
1.2 PURPOSE OF CEQA
CEQA Guidelines Section 15002(a)describes the basic purposes of CEQA which are to:
1. Inform government decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental
effects of proposed activities.
2. Identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.
3. Prevent significant, avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in projects
through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures.
4. Disclose to the public the reason why a governmental agency approved the project in the
manner the agency chose if significant environmental effects are involved.
Introduction Page 2
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The adoption of the Master Plan is considered a project under CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Section
15378(a)(1)). Pursuant to Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared this IS/MND
to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. All aspects and phases of
the Master Plan are considered in this IS/MND at a programmatic level. The Master Plan presents
opportunities for enhancing the parks and recreation system, but the implementation of the new park
features would be subject to a separate CEQA determination.
If the analysis in this IS/MND determines there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project,
either individually or cumulatively, may have a significant effect on the environment, the City shall
prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or determine whether a previously prepared EIR would
adequately analyze the project at hand.
The City may prepare a Negative Declaration (ND) or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the
project if the Initial Study determines there is no substantial evidence that the project, or any of its
aspects, may have a significant effect on the environment.
1.3 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
As described in greater detail throughout this IS/MND, adoption of the Master Plan would result in
future projects that have the potential for significant impacts to aesthetic, biological, cultural, and tribal
resources. Mitigation measures have been identified to reduce these potentially significant impacts to
less than significant levels. The impacts and mitigation measures are summarized in the Draft
Mitigated Negative Declaration presented at the front of this document. Pursuant to Section 15097 of
the CEQA Guidelines, lead agencies are required to prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program (MMRP) that describes the roles and responsibilities in monitoring and reporting on the
implementation of the proposed mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND.
1.4 LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
City of Cupertino
Department of Public Works
10300 Torre Avenue,
Cupertino, California 95014
1.5 CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER
Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager
City of Cupertino, Department of Public Works
408-777-3120
parksmp@cupertino.org
1.6 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
The purpose of this IS/MND is to evaluate the potentially significant environmental impacts of the
Master Plan. This IS/MND is organized as follows:
• Chapter 1 – Introduction. This chapter introduces the project and describes the purpose and
organization of this IS/MND.
• Chapter 2 – Project Description. This chapter describes the project location, area, site,
objectives, and characteristics.
• Chapter 3 – Environmental Checklist and Responses. This chapter contains the Environmental
Checklist, which identifies potentially significant and less-than-significant environmental
impacts (by environmental issue) and discusses each impact resulting from implementation of
the proposed project. This chapter also contains the Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Introduction Page 3
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Chapter 4 – Report Preparation. This chapter provides a list of those involved in the
preparation of this IS/MND.
• Appendices
Introduction Page 4
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page is intentionally left blank.
Project Description Page 5
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Chapter 2. Project Description
2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE
In 2015, the City of Cupertino (City) initiated the Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
(Master Plan) planning process to better align the City’s park and recreation services with community
expectations, to identify key projects that could be added to the recreation system, and to ensure the
City has the resources needed to create a park system that embodies Cupertino’s desires.
The Master Plan integrates the community’s vision into a cohesive strategy to guide future
development, renovation, and management of City parks, recreation facilities, and trails. The Master
Plan would provide direction for the City as it improves and enhances the City’s parks through the
year 2040. The Master Plan was developed after an extensive public engagement process that
helped assess community needs and goals while identifying opportunities to meet those needs in the
future.
The Master Plan is focused on City owned or managed developed parks, facilities, and trails in
Cupertino, and does not cover non-City natural open spaces, or other non-City owned assets such as
county and regional parks. The Master Plan does not cover trails that are owned and managed by
other entities. It integrates trails that have been previously addressed in the Cupertino 2016 Bicycle
Transportation Plan or 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan or other regional documents. The Master
Plan does identify enhancement opportunities for joint City/School District improvements to school
district facilities, primarily sport fields that are covered by an existing City/School District agreement.
2.2 PROJECT LOCATION
Cupertino, California, is on the western edge of Silicon Valley abutting the foothills of the Santa Cruz
Mountains. The City encompasses approximately 13 square miles and is located 42 miles south of San
Francisco. Cupertino is surrounded by the cities of Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, Saratoga,
and San Jose. The City contains numerous residential neighborhoods, a number of vibrant commercial
areas, corporate campuses, De Anza Community College, and many mixed-use areas (see Figure 2-1
Regional Location). Cupertino contains four major local roadways which transect or border the City:
Homestead Road, Wolfe Road, De Anza Boulevard, and Stevens Creek Boulevard. These major mixed-
use corridors have been the center of retail, commercial, office and multi-family housing in Cupertino
for decades. They act as “spines” of the community–connecting residential neighborhoods to major
employment centers, schools and colleges, civic uses, parks, highways and freeways, and adjacent
cities.
The Master Plan would encompass the park and recreation system owned and/or managed by the City.
The City has approximately 224 acres of park, trails, and sports fields at 32 sites managed by the City
(see Figure 2-2 and Table 2-1). These include a variety of parks ranging from smaller neighborhood
parks to large parks that attract people from across the community. Figure 2-2 shows the locations of
park and recreation facilities within the City with a focus on public facilities. Table 2-1 lists each park
and recreation facility, the location, size, available amenities, and other relevant information.
City of Cupertino
San JoseFremont
Sacramento
Oakland Stockton
Santa Rosa
Richmond
Gilroy
San Mateo
MontereyC:\Users\bdannels\Dropbox\Work\Cases\20288_01_Cupertino_PMP_IS\GIS\MXDs\Fig1_RegionalSetting_20190108.mxd1/8/2019Source: ESRI, 2018; MIG, 2019
City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan IS/MND
0 2.5 51.25 Miles
Figure 2-1: Regional Location Map
CalabazasPark
WestwoodOaks Park
MurdockPark
RainbowPark SaratogaCreek Park
MaywoodPark
JennyStrandPark
JohnMisePark
GrantPark
OrtegaPark
SerraPark
RaynorPark
SARATOGA
SAN JOSE
SUNNYVALE
LOS ALTOS
SANTA
CLARA
Stevens
Creek
Reservoir
SAN JOSE
Homestead Rd
Lawrence ExpwyStelling RdStevens Creek Blvd
McClellan Rd
Bubb RdS
t
e
v
en
s
C
an
y
on
R
d Foothill BlvdFo
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
Pierce RdSaratoga Sunnyvale RdSunnyvale Saratoga RdDe Anza BlvdQuito RdBlaney AveWolfe RdMiller AveBollinger Rd
Rainbow Dr
Prospect Rd
Blackberry Farm Park
MemorialPark
Kennedy MiddleSchool
CreeksidePark
Hyde MiddleSchool
LindaVistaPark
Blackberry FarmGolf Course
CollinsElementary
EatonElementary
FariaElementary
Varian Park
LincolnElementary
RegnartElementary
Jollyman Park
WilsonPark
Hoover Park
Garden GateElementary
Stevens CreekElementary
PortalPark
StocklmeirRanch
LibraryField
Sports Center
Three OaksPark
Monta Vista RecreationCenter & Park
McClellanRanch West
SomersetPark
Mary AveDog ParkCanyonOakPark
LittleRanchoPark
SterlingBarnhartPark
Community Hall
De AnzaCollege
StevensCreekCounty Park
Fremont OlderOpen SpacePreservePicchetti RanchOpen SpacePreserve
RanchoSan AntonioCounty ParkRanchoSan AntonioOpen SpacePreserve
StevensCreekCounty Park
Deep CliGolf Course
CupertinoHigh School
HomesteadHigh School
LawsonMiddleSchool
MontaVista
McClellan SHchooligh
Ranch Preserve RanchoRinconada
CivicPark CupertinoLibrary
Cali MillPlaza
SedgwickElementary
TownSquare
Main StreetPark
SCVWDPercolationPond
Cupertino CityCenter ParkCity Hall
LynbrookHigh School
MillerMiddleSchool
CupertinoMiddleSchool
ArchbishopMitty HighSchool
West ValleyElementary
NimitzElementary
DilworthElementaryMeyerholzElementary Murdock-PortalElementary
De VargasElementary
EisenhowerElementary
StocklmeirElementary Calabazas CreekSaratoga CreekRodeo CreekPermanente CreekPr
o
s
p
e
c
t
C
r
e
e
k
Franco Park
Junipero Serra Channel
Swiss Creek Heney CreeksSunnyvale East ChannelMontebello Creek CreekSaratogaRegnart CreekStevens CreekRecreation Centers/Fields
Recreation Centers/Facilities
Other Facilities
Base Map Features
Cupertino City Boundary
Cupertino Sphere of Influence **
Railroad
Creeks and Channels
Water Bodies
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.50.125
Miles
Note: * City-owned facilities evaluated in the Initial Study
** per Local Agency Formation Commission
Sources: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County, 2017.
Local Parks Open to Public
County Parks & Regional Open Space Preserves
Schools and Colleges
Golf Course
Community Parks*
Large Neighborhood Parks*
Small Neighborhood Parks*
Special Use Sites*
School Fields Managed by City
Shared-Use Paths*
City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System
Master Plan IS/MND
Figure 2-2
Existing Parks, Open Space and
Recreation Resources
Other Recreation Resources
Cupertino Parks and Trails
Project Description Project Description Page 8 This page left blank intentionally City of Cupertino Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Project Description Page 9
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 1
Name Address Size in
Acres Zoning General Plan Land
Use Designation Existing Facilities
COMMUNITY PARK
Memorial Park 21251 Stevens Creek
Blvd 22.1 PR P, PF B/S, T, A, OF/L, PA, PL, RB, FP/K, BBQ,
RR, WIFI, RF, RP
Stevens Creek Corridor
Linear park from Stevens
Creek Blvd. to McClellan
Road
63.7 PR P
V, CG, HP, OF/L, PA, PL, SW, WP, RB,
OB, FP/K, R/F, NA, TR, BBQ, CON, RR,
WIFI, RP
Total Community Park Area 85.8 Acres
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Creekside Park 10455 Miller Ave 13.0 PR P B, S, OF/L, PA, PL, RB, FP/K, BBQ,
CON, RR, RF
Hoover Park Leeds Ave and Donegal
Dr 5.0 PR P B, S, OF/L, PA, PL
Jollyman Park 1000 S Stelling Rd 11.2 PR P B/S, B, S, OF/L, PA, PL, BBQ, RR,
Linda Vista Park 11111 Linda Vista Dr 11.0 PR P OF/L, PA, PL, BBQ, RR, RP
Monta Vista Park &
Recreation Center 22601 Voss Ave 6.2 PR P B/S, T, OF/L, PA, PL, RB, BBQ, RR
1The full Park and Facility Inventory Matrix can be found in Appendix A of the Master Plan.
Project Description Page 10
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 1
Name Address Size in
Acres Zoning General Plan Land
Use Designation Existing Facilities
Portal Park 10225 N Portal Ave 3.8 PR P OF/L, PA, PL, RB, FP/K, BBQ, RR, AS,
RP
Varian Park 22200 Varian Way 6.3 PR P T, OF/L, PA, PL, BBQ, AS
Wilson Park 10249 S Portal Ave
&19784 Wintergreen Dr. 9.9 PR P B/S, S, OF/L, PA, PL, RB, FP/K, BBQ,
CON, RR, RF
Total Large Neighborhood Park Area 66.4 Acres
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Canyon Oak Park 21140-21150 Canyon
Oak Way 0.6 P(Res) P PL
Franco Park 10981 Franco Ct 0.6 PR P PA, PL
Little Rancho Park 23635 Oak Valley Rd 0.3 P(Res) P PL
Somerset Park 10798 Stokes Ave 1.7 PR P B, OF/L, PA, PL, BBQ
Sterling Barnhart Park 10486 Sterling Blvd 0.5 PR P PA, PL
Three Oaks Park 7535 Shadowhill Ln 3.1 PR P OF/L, PA, PL, BBQ
Total Small Neighborhood Park Area 6.8 Acres
Project Description Page 11
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 1
Name Address Size in
Acres Zoning General Plan Land
Use Designation Existing Facilities
SPECIAL USE SITES
Civic Center:
Civic Center Plaza/
Community Hall 10350 Torre Ave 1.0 P (BA) PF WP, OB, FP/K, R/F, RR, WIFI
Library Field Torre Ave & Pacifica Dr 3.0 P (BA) PF C, OF/L
Mary Avenue Dog Park 10309 Mary Ave 0.5 PR P
Cupertino Sports
Center
21111 Stevens Creek
Blvd 6.2 PR P T, RB, CON, RR, WIFI, RF
Total Special Use Sites Area 10.7 Acres
TRAIL CORRIDORS
Don Burnett Bicycle-
Pedestrian Bridge &
Trail
4.0 T T TR
Creekside Park and
Regnart Creek Trail
1 block from East Estates
Dr to Calabazas Creek/
Creekside Park
0.1 *
*acreage
excludes
Creekside
Park
Regnart
Creek
Trail: R1
East of E
Estates Dr.
Creekside
Park: PR
Regnart Creek Trail:
Riparian Corridor
Creekside Park: P
TR
Project Description Page 12
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 1
Name Address Size in
Acres Zoning General Plan Land
Use Designation Existing Facilities
Saratoga Creek Trail 4.7 Pre-PR P NA, TR
Stevens Creek Trail - PR P NA, TR
Total Trail Corridors Area 8.8 Acres
SCHOOL FIELDS (MANAGED BY THE CITY)
Collins Elementary
School 10300 N Blaney Ave 2.5 BA PF B/S
Eaton Elementary
School 20220 Suisun Dr 4.5 BA PF B/S, S
Faria Elementary 10155 Barbara Ln 4.2 BA PF B/S, S
Garden Gate
Elementary School 10500 Ann Arbor Ave 2.9 BA PF S
Hyde Middle School 19325 Bollinger Rd 7.8 BA PF B/S, S
Kennedy Middle School 821 Bubb Rd 13.3 BA PF B/S, S, RR
Lincoln Elementary
School 21710 McClellan Rd 3.1 BA PF B/S, S
Regnart Elementary
School 1170 Yorkshire Dr 4.1 BA PF B/S, S
Project Description Page 13
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-1: Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 1
Name Address Size in
Acres Zoning General Plan Land
Use Designation Existing Facilities
Stevens Creek
Elementary School 10300 Ainsworth Dr 3.1 BA PF B/S, S
Total School Fields Area 45.5 Acres
Facility Definitions:
A – Amphitheater
AS – Adjacent to
school
B - Basketball Hoop
BBQ – BBQ Grills
B/S – Baseball/Softball
C - Cricket Field
CG – Community Garden
CON – Concession
FP/K – Food Prep/
Kitchen
HP – Horseshoe Pit
NA – Natural Area
OB – Other Building
OF/L – Open Field/ Lawn
PA – Picnic Area
PL – Play ground
RB – Recreation Bldg.
R/F – Restaurant/ Food
Service
RR – Restrooms
RF – Rentable Facility
RP – Reservable Picnic
S - Soccer Field
SW – Swimming Pool
T - Tennis Courts
TR –Trail
V - Volleyball Court
WIFI – WiFi
WP – Water Play
Zoning Ordinance Abbreviations:
BA – Public Building
P(BA) – Planned Development-Public Building
PR – Parks and Recreation
P(Res) – Planned Development-Residential
R1 – Single Family Residential
T - Transportation
General Plan Land Use Definitions:
P (Parks and Open Space) – Land owned by the public and used for recreation
PF (Public Facilities) – Land used or planned to be used by a governmental entity
for a public service
RC (Riparian Corridor) – Creek corridors not part of a larger park or residential
property
T (Transportation) – Streets, highways, and rail corridors
Project Description Page 14
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page left blank intentionally
Project Description Page 15
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
2.2.1 Existing Park and Recreation Facilities
The City parks contain typical park amenities including sports fields, restrooms, and
playgrounds. The parks are well maintained, with standardized landscapes and facilities. Many
are decades old and could do more to integrate natural resources and habitat. Some newer
parks such as Sterling Barnhart and the McClellan Ranch Preserve Environmental Education
Center, provide newer design features and higher amenity levels. The park and recreation
system also includes nine indoor facilities to support recreation. In 2017, it was estimated that
more than 347,000 people participated in City Park and Recreation programs. Of these,
approximately 60,000 attended community events based in Cupertino’s parks.
The City currently has about 3.7 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, when land publicly
accessible through agreements is counted (using U.S. Census Bureau data for the City’s July
2018 population estimate). The General Plan standard is a minimum of 3 acres per 1,000
residents. If the amount of land accessible due to an agreement with Cupertino Union School
District is excluded, the available park land is about 178 acres (or approximately 2.96 acres per
1,000 residents).
2.2.1.1 Existing Parks
Figure 2-2 shows various types of parks spread throughout the City, and Table 2-1 provides a
list of City parks, recreation facilities, and associated amenities.
Community Parks
Community parks serve multiple neighborhoods and provide features that draw users from the
entire City. Community parks are larger parks with multiple features such as sports fields,
community centers, or destination playgrounds. The City has two community parks; Memorial
Park (22.1 acres) and Stevens Creek Corridor Park (63.7 acres), Memorial Park is a popular
park and facility venue for festivals and special outdoor events; it contains the Quinlan
Community Center and the Senior Center.
For purposes of this IS/MND, Stevens Creek Corridor Park includes the contiguous lands along
Stevens Creek from McClellan Road to Stevens Creek Boulevard owned by the City and Santa
Clara Valley Water District, also known as Valley Water (note that the south tip of Varian Park
which contains a short stretch of Stevens Creek is not included in Stevens Creek Corridor Park).
Stevens Creek Corridor Park is a community-focused natural area supporting environmental
education, outdoor gathering, and recreation consistent with the site’s wildlife and habitat value.
Stevens Creek Corridor Park contains multiple facilities including the Blackberry Farm Golf
Course, Blackberry Farm Park, McClellan Ranch Preserve, McClellan Ranch West, and
Stocklmeir Ranch. Most of the Stevens Creek Corridor Park facilities are not addressed in detail
in the Master Plan because the City is developing a master plan specific to the park.
Large Neighborhood Parks
Large Neighborhood parks (8 sites totaling 66.4 acres), varying between four and 13 acres in
size, provide a range of passive and active recreation opportunities for the surrounding
neighborhoods. They include play areas, picnic areas, open lawn areas, and sports fields or
courts. Several also include programmable and reservable facilities, such as sports fields and
small recreation centers. Examples of large neighborhood parks are Creekside Park, Jollyman
Park, and Wilson Park.
Small Neighborhood Parks
Small neighborhood parks (6 sites totaling 6.8 acres) provide essential recreation opportunities
for nearby neighbors. These parks are typically less than three acres, and may include play
Project Description Page 16
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
areas, open lawn areas, and picnic tables/benches, or sports courts. Examples of small
neighborhood parks are Little Rancho Park and Sterling Barnhart Park.
Special Use Sites
Special use sites (five sites totaling 10.7 acres) support unique recreation opportunities serving
all or most of the Cupertino community. These single-purpose sites include specialized
recreation facilities not found elsewhere in the park system. Urban plazas, civic space, dog
parks and sports complexes are considered special use parks. Examples of special use sites
are Civic Center Plaza, Mary Avenue Dog Park, and the Cupertino Sports Center.
Trail Corridors
Trail Corridors (four sites totaling 8.8 acres, excluding acreage for Stevens Creek Trail which is
counted in Community Parks) includes trails and associated greenways that link destinations in
the community. These are single-purpose linear features not located within parks of other types.
These trails may extend beyond Cupertino and connect to surrounding cities and regional trail
systems. Examples of existing trails are the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge and Trail,
and Saratoga Creek Trail.
School Fields Managed by the City
This category includes sports fields at school sites managed through a joint use agreement
(nine sites totaling 45.5 acres). These sports fields provide additional recreational opportunities
to the community when not in use by the schools. The school fields covered under the joint use
agreement are Collins Elementary, Eaton Elementary, Faria Elementary, Garden Gate
Elementary, Hyde Middle, Kennedy Middle, Lincoln Elementary, Regnart Elementary, and
Stevens Creek Elementary Schools.
2.3 LAND USES AND SETTING
Cupertino was incorporated in 1955 and grew from a lightly settled agricultural community of
2,500 people into a mostly suburban community during Silicon Valley’s expansion from the
1960s through the 1980s (Cupertino 2015b).
Cupertino’s land use pattern was largely built on a conventional suburban model, with
predominantly single-family residential subdivisions and distinct commercial and employment
centers. This development pattern was heavily influenced by the topography of the area, with
more intensive growth located on the valley floor and lower density residential in the foothills.
The western area by the foothills is semi-rural with steep terrain, larger residential lots and
access to open space. The pattern becomes more suburban immediately west of Highway85
where residential neighborhoods have a more uniform pattern with smaller lots and older
commercial and industrial areas along Stevens Creek Boulevard and Bubb Road. The land use
pattern becomes more urban east of Highway 85, with a relatively connected street grid and
commercial development along major boulevards such as Stevens Creek, De Anza,
Homestead, Stelling, and Wolfe Road. This area also has significant amounts of multi-family
development in and around the major boulevards.
Cupertino is one of many cities that compose the "heart" of Silicon Valley, as many
semiconductor and computer companies were founded in the City and in the surrounding areas.
The City is the worldwide headquarters for Apple Inc. which is the City’s largest employer Other
large employers are Seagate Technology, and Foothill–De Anza Community College District
(Cupertino Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2018G)
Parks and open space areas are more concentrated in the western portion of the City limits with
neighborhood and other parks interspersed throughout the remainder of the City. The western
portion of Cupertino, which extends into the foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains, is developed
Project Description Page 17
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
with low density residential neighborhoods backing up to regional open space preserves
including McClellan Ranch Preserve owned by the City of Cupertino; Midpeninsula Regional
Open Space District (MROSD) preserves including Rancho San Antonio Preserve, Picchetti
Ranch Open Space Preserve, and Fremont Older Open Space Preserve; and Stevens Creek
County Park owned and operated by Santa Clara County. Class I-style shared-use trails
(exclusive right-of-way for bicycles and pedestrians away from the roadway and with cross flows
by motor traffic minimized) owned or managed by the City include the Don Burnett Bicycle-
Pedestrian Bridge and Trail connecting Mary Avenue south of Highway 280 to Homestead
Road, the Saratoga Creek Trail connecting the Rancho Rinconada Recreation Center area to
Sterling Barnhart Park and Mitty Way, and Stevens Creek Trail within the Stevens Creek
Corridor Park. Proposed improvements to the bicycle and pedestrian transportation network are
contained in the City’s Bicycle (2016) and Pedestrian (2018) Transportation Plans.
2.4 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
The General Plan shows most parks and recreation system facilities within the Parks and Open
Space and Public Facilities land use designations. Table 2-1 lists the land use designation for
each City park and recreation system facility as presented in the General Plan.
2.5 ZONING DISTRICT
The City’s Zoning Ordinance contained in the Cupertino Municipal Code (Municipal Code)
contains regulations and development standards that implement the policies of the General Plan.
The Zoning Ordinance identifies City parks as being mostly within the Park and Recreation (PR)
zoning district. Canyon Oak Park and Little Rancho Park are within the Planned Development –
Residential(P(Res)) zoning district and the Civic Center Plaza/Community Hall is within the
Planned Development – Public Building (P(BA)) zoning district. School fields managed by the City
are within the Public Building (BA) zoning district. Park and recreation system trail corridors that
cross multiple zoning districts and public rights-of-way do not have single zoning designations,
but the portions with public rights-of-way are considered as Transportation (T) zoning. Table 2-1
lists the land use designation for each City park and recreation system facility as presented in the
City’s Zoning Ordinance.
2.6 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
The proposed Master Plan provides a cohesive strategy to guide the future development,
enhancement, renovation, and management of City parks, recreation facilities, and trails. It
provides direction for the City through the year 2040.
2.6.1 Covered Facilities
The Master Plan is focused on existing and planned City owned or managed parks and special
use sites, trail corridors, potential major new facilities, and school fields managed by the City.
The enhancement opportunities identified in the Master Plan are designed as a guide and
decision-making tool for the City, and do not necessarily include every park or recreation facility
improvement needed over time. The Master Plan presents enhancement opportunities for the
parks and recreation system that would be implemented over a period of time. Therefore, some
enhancements may evolve over time or may not be fully implemented depending on the design
process, community input, neighborhood compatibility, or environmental constraints.
2.6.2 Master Plan Description
The proposed Master Plan is the result of an analysis of the existing park and recreation system
as well as an extensive community engagement process involving: inventory of parks and
recreation facilities; analysis of needs and interests; development of vision and goals; and
Project Description Page 18
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
identification of project opportunities. An overview of this planning process is presented in
Chapter 2 of the Master Plan. The Master Plan incorporates relevant data and policies from
several documents:
•Cupertino General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040 (Amended October 20, 2015 by
Ordinance Number CC 15-087)
•Americans with Disabilities Act Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan (2015)
•Bicycle Transportation Plan (2016)
•Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018)
2.6.2.1 Systemwide Objectives and Actions
The Master Plan establishes seven goals to provide overarching guidance and direction for
long-range change for the parks and recreation system. Each Master Plan goal is supported by
specific objectives, and objectives are carried out by proposed actions. Chapter 3 of the Master
Plan presents all goals, objectives, and actions. The Master Plan goals and objectives with the
potential to affect the environment are presented in Table 2-2. The goals, objectives, and
actions listed in Table 2-2 are the focus of this CEQA environmental impact analysis.
Table 2-2: Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and
Actions with the Potential to Have Environmental Effects
Objective Action
Goal Master Plan #1: Conservation – Protect nature, trees, and natural areas in parks and
throughout the City to support wildlife, ecological functions, and a stronger connection to
Cupertino’s natural environment.
Objective 1A: Protect important
natural resources, habitat, and
riparian corridors through acquisition
and collaboration.
i Protect important natural resources through park land
acquisition, conservation easements, regulations and other
techniques.
iii Connect habitat within the Stevens Creek corridor from
north to south Cupertino, taking interim steps and making
progress towards protection and preservation of this key
riparian corridor.
Objective 1B: Manage meadows,
natural areas, wildlife habitat and
creeks within City jurisdiction to
maintain and restore ecological
health and function.
i Implement or support work by others to remove invasive
species, address bank erosion, enhance habitat value, and
improve water quality and flood capacity to enhance the
ecological function along Regnart, Calabazas, Heney,
Stevens, Permanente and Saratoga Creeks, Junipero Serra
Channel and open space parcels. (Most such sites are not
City-owned.)
ii Foster natural systems by creating pollinator pathways
through the City, taking advantage of rights-of-way to create
a gridded network of habitat within the urban core of
Cupertino.
iii Add bird-friendly and pollinator-friendly plantings, gardens
and features in parks and at other City-owned sites. Include
bird baths/water sources, rocks with shallow depressions,
bird houses and nest-friendly areas, bee nesting blocks,
vegetation for forage and cover, and protected, non-mulched
ground areas for ground-nesting species where appropriate.
iv Create or enhance “park forests,” concentrated tree
plantings that establish a large, contiguous tree canopy and
emphasize native trees. Augment the existing tree canopies
at Jollyman Park, Three Oaks Park, and Linda Vista Park.
Project Description Page 19
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
vii Within the Stevens Creek corridor, renovate the
Blackberry Farm Golf Course to provide improved habitat
value. Future decisions regarding the golf course property
should respect the site’s unique creekside location and
emphasize choices that are compatible with increased
ecological value.
Objective 1C: Ensure natural
resources in parks and on City
property are maintained and
stewarded.
i Continue to work with volunteers and partners to improve,
enhance and restore natural areas.
ii Maintain natural areas in parks to control invasive species,
remove or prune hazardous trees, control river- and stream-
bank erosion, minimize wildfire hazards and provide safe
access.
iii Develop a maintenance management plan that addresses
natural resources in park lands and trail corridors and
regularly update it. This plan will identify the maintenance
tasks, frequencies, staffing and resources needed to
manage, maintain and steward natural resources.
Objective 1D: Design parks and trail
corridors to reflect and respect the
Santa Clara Valley local ecology,
habitats, and native landscape.
i Incorporate and enhance existing natural features when
renovating parks or building new ones.
ii Preserve existing native or large canopy trees in parks.
iii Increase tree canopy where opportunities exist. Develop a
Parks Tree Palette for adding/replacing trees, and a plan for
canopy succession.
v Embrace storm water management, incorporating green
infrastructure elements such as rain gardens, bioswales,
permeable pavers and detention ponds to help reduce
flooding, filter pollutants and replenish groundwater during
storm events.
vi Replace unused or under-used areas of lawn in City parks
with pollinator gardens, native plant species, trees that
provide canopy or wildlife value, and other planting regimes
with habitat value.
vii Incorporate dark sky policies, which the City plans to
develop in 2019-20, into park and facility design and
operations. Minimize light intrusion into environmentally
sensitive areas and minimize/avoid lighting of creek corridors
or riparian habitats. Consider methods such as light
intensities as low as feasible, appropriate LED lighting color
range, use of low shielded downlighting, and turning off lights
at night.
viii Incorporate bird-safe design guidelines, which the City
plans to develop in 2019-20, into park and facility design and
operations. Consider methods such as use of
opaque/fritted/etched glass, avoiding multi-story
reflective/transparent glass, avoiding exterior up-lighting and
spotlights, use of shielded exterior lights, and turning off
building lights or use of window blinds at night.
Objective 1E: Expand opportunities
to experience nature, balancing
access with natural resource
protection.
i Locate access points away from high value habitat and
significant natural resources to the extent feasible.
iii Add nature play elements in several locations.
Project Description Page 20
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
iv Encourage interaction with nature through the provision of
nature trails, habitat viewing areas, and pollinator plantings.
vi Incorporate community gardens at park sites to provide
hands-on opportunities to interact with nature by growing and
harvesting food.
vii Add plantings in developed parks to attract birds and
butterflies for viewing; incorporate boulder groupings,
logs/woody debris, and other niches and micro-habitats
where insect and plant discovery can occur.
viii Provide quiet areas with seating that allow for solitude, in
locations with views of creeks, natural areas, or vistas across
the landscape.
ix Support trails in creek corridors and natural areas, in a
manner that accommodates wildlife protection.
Objective 1F: Support environmental
education and nature interpretation.
iii Create naturehood parks” by providing more natural
elements and learning areas in large neighborhood parks
(such as outdoor “classrooms”, gardens, places to dig).
Goal MP2: Connection – Provide an interconnected network of multi-use trails, walkways, and
bikeways, close to home parks, and community destinations.
Objective 2.A Implement
recommendations for the proposed
trails and paths noted in the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, Cupertino
General Plan, Countywide Trails
Master Plan and other local and
regional plans to improve access to
parks and expand walking and biking
opportunities in Cupertino.
v Implement way-finding signage to support use of trails,
walkways and bikeways.
Objective2.B Prioritize the
completion of a comprehensive
network of off-street walkways, trails
and protected bikeways to provide
safe, inviting walking and biking
opportunities.
iii Extend existing trails and fill gaps in connectivity to link
City and County parks and regional open space preserves
and provide access to pedestrians and bicyclists to trails in
regional open space areas. (See Appendix D of the
Master Plan).
iv Connect the existing popular multi-use paths (Don
Burnett Bicycle Pedestrian Bridge and Homestead Road
to Mary Avenue Trail, Stevens Creek Trail, and Saratoga
Creek Trail) to more locations when possible, such as
extending the Mary Avenue Trail southward toward
Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza College, extending
Stevens Creek Trails south to Linda Vista Park or Stevens
Creek County Park, extending Saratoga Creek Trail
northward to Stevens Creek Boulevard, or connecting the
east end of Junipero Serra Channel trail to the Saratoga
Creek Trail.
vii Provide more trails in creek corridors (in a wildlife
compatible manner), rail corridors and off-street locations to
support park connectivity, non-motorized transportation,
recreation and health benefits.
Project Description Page 21
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
Objective 2.C Support walking in
parks
i Provide looped internal pathways or trails in parks with
adequate space, wide enough for people to walk side-by-
side comfortably.
ii Provide benches, water fountains, distance markers, and
other amenities along pathways and trails to encourage
walking for fitness. Add fitness stations along suitable
trails and walking routes in parks.
iii Vary trail length, types and challenge levels to expand
trail-related recreation options. Include soft-surfaced
nature trails and jogging trails, as well as hard surfaced
trails for bicycle, tricycle, walker, scooter and stroller use.
Objective 2.D Encourage biking and
walking to parks and recreation
destinations and use of non-single-
driver-vehicle options through
physical and programmatic
enhancements.
i Create welcoming pedestrian and cyclist entrances to
parks, with pedestrian and bike paths that are visually
prominent, direct, and physically separated from parking
lots.
ii Provide secure bike parking at parks, with racks located
near each use area. Add self-service bike repair stations
at community parks, on trails and at popular cycling
destinations.
vi Improve connections and paths between parks and
surrounding uses, such as schools and nearby
neighborhoods.
Goal MP3: Equitable Access – Distribute parks and facilities throughout the community for easy
and equitable access.
Objective 3.A Provide parks within
walking distance of most residential
areas.
v Supplement neighborhood parks with parks that provide
specialized facilities to meet unique recreation needs,
such as dog parks, urban plazas, trail corridors, joint use
sports fields, community/recreation buildings, or other
special features.
Objective 3.C Expand recreation
opportunities by enhancing park and
facility access.
iii Improve entryways to parks and recreation facilities to
make them more attractive, accessible, and welcoming.
Ensure parks and recreation facilities are as welcoming to
visitors traveling by foot and bicycle as they are to those
arriving by automobile.
iv Consider programmatic and physical improvements to
improve access by motorized and public transportation.
Improve drop-off areas and loading/unloading zones;
address parking needs while considering autonomous
vehicle trends; facilitate or connect residents to shuttle
services, transit and transportation options.
Goal MP4: Enhancement – Reinvigorate and revitalize parks and recreation facilities and diversify
offerings to support broad and inclusive recreational interests.
Objective 4.A Embark on a program
of strategic reinvestment in and
renovation/expansion of major
facilities to meet community
priorities.
ii Improve the user experience when renovating existing
indoor facilities. Include welcoming entry sequences,
social/lobby/lounge spaces, convenient pick-up and drop-
off, and comfortable areas to wait for transportation.
Objective 4.B Consider adding new
major facilities to meet community
needs at existing parks, through
iv Consider adding the following facilities in the future, if
warranted and desired:
––Performing Arts/Fine Arts Center
Project Description Page 22
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
renovations to existing facilities, or at
sites acquired in the future
––Gymnasium/Recreation Center
–– Year-round Aquatics (see 4C below)
––Expanded Senior Center or satellite site with senior-
friendly services
––Improved/Relocated Teen Center
––Technology Center/Incubator Hub/Maker Space
Objective 4.C Expand swimming and
water play opportunities
iv Provide more water play features (splash pads/spray
play areas/ interactive water features) for play in warm
weather, geographically dispersed in the City.
Objective 4.D Diversify play
experiences to support extraordinary
play.
ii Provide a universally-accessible, all-inclusive destination
play area in an easily accessible location such as a large
neighborhood park.
iii Provide inclusive elements in new play areas and in
existing ones when renovating or updating them, and to
all play areas over time.
Objective 4.E Improve the
functionality and usability of existing
facilities for field sports.
i Design multi-use sports fields to support multiple sports:
rectangular fields should be designed to allow for soccer,
lacrosse, Ultimate Frisbee, etc.
ii Provide at least one cricket/multi-use field.
vi Evaluate whether lighting any sport fields is appropriate
to extend evening usage hours.
4.F Add new features and facilities at
existing parks to create variety and
respond to diverse recreation
interests.
i Provide at least one special feature or facility at each
large neighborhood park, so that each park offers
something unique in addition to the traditional park
features of playgrounds, sports fields, and picnic tables.
ii Consider incorporating additional features suggested by
the community during the Master Plan process when
renovating existing or building new parks. (See also
Chapter 4.)
–Covered/shaded picnic areas for smaller groups (5-25)
–More outdoor event space
–Outdoor games, such as chess tables, giant checkers,
Jenga®, or outdoor table tennis
–More courts and types of courts (bocce, pickleball,
badminton, volleyball, futsal) which address the
community’s diversity
–Outdoor “living rooms,” “libraries” and seating areas
–Outdoor fitness equipment
–Bike skills area or pump track
–Roller hockey
–Disc golf course (full or mini course)
–Community gardens
–Healing garden
–Teaching/educational garden
iii Prioritize the addition of basketball courts, especially
full-size courts, to provide multiple basketball venues.
Project Description Page 23
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
iv Provide additional dog parks and explore providing off -
leash dog areas and/or dog exercise spaces where
suitable.
4.G Provide social hubs, group
gathering spaces and activity areas
to support social interaction, self-
directed group activities and drop-in
users.
i Add a variety of seating options and groupings of seating
in parks: benches, movable seating, plop benches, seat
walls.
ii Create activity hubs by locating seating areas, shade,
and other elements that encourage people to linger near
places that attract daily activity (playgrounds, dog parks,
etc.)
iii Provide shaded, reservable and “first-come, first-
served” medium and large group picnic areas at multiple
sites across Cupertino.
iv Incorporate accessible outdoor fitness hubs in parks,
locating these near activity areas.
v Provide restrooms in higher use parks.
vi Provide Wi-Fi and shaded/covered outdoor working
areas with charging stations in selected parks to
encourage students and employees to be outdoors.
vii Provide equipment and technology in parks that
supports recreation activity, especially fitness.
Goal MP5: Activity – Support social gatherings, events, programs, and activities for people of all
ages, abilities, cultures, and interests.
Objective 5A: Facilitate and provide
events, fairs, and festivals that foster
community cohesiveness
ii Improve facilities and infrastructure at Memorial Park to
better accommodate festivals.
Objective5.B Rethink facilities,
programs and services to empower
Cupertino youth and teens.
vii Add more challenging and adventurous recreation
facilities, such as climbing spires and bike skills parks and
provide introductory “lessons” and social activities to
encourage use.
Objective 5.E Support environmental
education and nature interpretation
programming.
iv Provide more challenging nature-based activities in
parks and recreation facilities, such as tree climbing,
orienteering, overnight camping, outdoor survival training,
canoe/kayak training (in pools or at reservoirs/lakes), etc.
MP Goal 6: Quality – Create high quality recreation experiences, places and services that are
welcoming, safe, responsive, comfortable and reflective of Cupertino’s unique character.
6.A Design and develop high quality,
high functioning parks and social
spaces.
vi Provide support amenities such as lighting, trash
receptacles, water fountains, dog dishes, restrooms,
loading/unloading zones and parking to address site
functional needs. For example, provide restrooms inside
indoor facilities in neighborhood parks to better support
staff-led program activities for children. Ensure parking
and drop-off areas and loading/ unloading zones support
facility use, events and programs.
6.B Incorporate Cupertino’s identity
and placemaking into park and
facility design, renovation and
revitalization.
vi Protect, preserve, and restore historic buildings and
sites and provide interpretive signage about Cupertino’s
local history to inform visitors and spotlight Cupertino’s
uniqueness.
Project Description Page 24
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
viii Provide interpretive elements in parks to educate the
community about the City’s cultural diversity and natural
resources. Enhance existing interpretive elements and
features to tell a story about Cupertino and the
surrounding region.
6.C Improve parks and recreation
hospitality and comfort to enhance
recreation user experiences.
i Make parks more comfortable by providing or enhancing
support amenities such as benches, drinking fountains
with bottle fillers and bike racks/bike parking.
ii Provide shaded areas in parks, trails, and outdoor
spaces, using shade trees, shade “sails” or permanent
shade structures.
iii Provide benches, tables, and places to relax in parks.
Provide benches at intervals along looped paths and
trails.
iv Provide small social spaces, seating areas, and activity
hubs in parks.
v Add device charging stations/plugs in parks or facilities
at higher-use gathering areas where demand exists.
Consider solar-powered options for outdoor benches and
tables.
vi Provide clean, inviting, accessible restrooms in large
neighborhood parks and community parks, and other high
use or well programmed sites. Include good ventilation
and amenities such as mirrors and baby changing
stations.
vii Consider parking/paving layouts that accommodate
mobile uses, including food trucks where appropriate
(consistent with Economic Development Strategic Plan
goals).
MP Goal 7 Sustainability - Provide, manage, and maintain parks, facilities, programs and services
through sound management and stewardship, sustainable choices and the wise use of resources.
7.B Develop and implement
customized guidelines and best
practices for sustainable park design
and development. (Sustainable
Choices)
i Consider permeable surfacing in at least 75% of new
paved trails and 50% of new parking lots. Stay apprised of
new pervious materials and technologies.
Ii Use local and recycled materials in building and
services.
iii Pursue green building or LEED-compliant construction
in the development of indoor facilities. [This does not
require LEED certification.]
v Develop water-efficient, climate-controlled irrigation
systems in all new parks. Update current irrigation
systems when parks are renovated to improve water
efficiency.
vi In new splash pads, “spray grounds” and fountains,
prioritize designs that use systems which clean and
recirculate the water, or that collect the water and use it for
irrigation.
vii Incorporate water efficient fixtures in all new restrooms
and water fountains. Add low-flow devices in all existing
restrooms toilets.
Project Description Page 25
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Objective Action
viii Consider the use of graywater where available for
irrigation at parks and possible public demonstration
purposes.
x Compost grass clippings, leaves, twigs, branches and other
garden or compostable refuse generated in public parks.
Continue to chip trimmed tree branches from appropriate
species to repurpose as mulch.
xi Integrate native and/or climate appropriate plants where
possible. Consider turf alternatives, except where turf is
delivering a beneficial use (sport field, golf course, play area,
etc.) or providing desired green space. Promote drought-
resistant / low water use turf species.
xiii Emphasize efficient, renewable, and/or clean energy
sources including solar and co-generation. Add solar-
powered features in new or renovated facilities where
appropriate.
xiv Provide electric vehicle charging stations in parking
areas. Strive to meet the most current standards for fast
charging.
7.C Steward Resources and
maintain assets to ensure high
quality parks and facilities (Sound
Management and Stewardship)
iv. Increase maintenance where needed to support
increased programming, activities, and facility
reservations in parks.
ix Train staff in maintenance and stewardship of natural
areas, green infrastructure, and bioswales, so that these
features thrive and the integrity of natural resources on
City property is maintained. Involve expert professional
services as needed to support informed and ongoing care
for habitat areas.
x Develop guidelines for vegetation management in the
Stevens Creek Corridor to promote natural resource
stewardship.
xi. Focus on stormwater management and green
infrastructure when designing and renovating City parks.
For example, consider installing a stormwater
management garden on city or public property to
showcase green infrastructure techniques.
Source: The City of Cupertino, Parks and Recreation System Master Plan, Chapter 3. October, 2019.
The Master Plan goals are consistent with the General Plan goals and policies for Parks and
Recreation. Many of the Master Plan objectives and actions incorporate General Plan policies
for the protection of the environment, including many which require protection and preservation
of natural resources and the environment through stormwater management, wildlife and creek
protection, water quality protection, efficient water and energy use, and implement city-wide
ordinances such as the Integrated Pest Management Ordinance, and Zero Waste policy.
2.6.2.2 Opportunities
Master Plan Chapter 4 Opportunity Highlights, describes the types of renovations and facility
development that would implement the Master Plan’s goals and objectives. There are a range of
project opportunities that would carry out Master Plan goals, objectives, and actions, including
the development of new parks and trails, potential major new facilities, and renovations to
Project Description Page 26
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
existing park sites. These opportunities are divided into the following categories, based on the
types and scale of the projects:
•Enhancement of existing parks,
•Enhancement of existing trails,
•Potential joint use opportunities,
•New acquisitions,
•Potential major new facilities,
•Expanded services,
•Added recreation elements, and
•Natural vegetation enhancements.
While Master Plan Chapter 4 presents highlights only, Master Plan Appendix E includes a
description of City park sites, along with enhancement opportunities. Appendix F documents
short and longer-term enhancements for existing parks, recreation facilities and recreation
elements by type (see Appendix A of this IS/MND).
The summary of site opportunities for enhancements to existing City parks, trails, special use
sites, and school fields managed by the City is presented in Table 2-3, below (see Table F-1 of
the Master Plan and reproduced here in Appendix A for the full table). Table 2-4 shows a
summary of the new acquisitions and potential major new facilities (see Table F-2 New Major
Park and Recreation Facility Opportunities matrix of the Master Plan and reproduced here in
Appendix A for the full table).
Table 2-3 presents enhancement opportunities at existing parks, trails and school sites. These
enhancement opportunities include routine improvements, as well as the potential to add new
recreation elements as summarized below:
2.6.2.3 Added Recreational Elements
The following describes the types of features that could be added within the system over both
the short and long-term to enhance user experiences. These items are included in Table F-3 of
the Master Plan.
Nature Play – Provide nature play elements in parks to connect people to nature and support
experiential play.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•All parks except special use sites and school fields
Water Play – Integrate a variety of water play opportunities at existing parks
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•All community and large neighborhood parks
Universal/All-Inclusive Play – Support inclusive play by providing a destination all-inclusive play
area, and by incorporating inclusive play elements at existing play areas.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•All community and large neighborhood parks
•Three Oaks Park
•Somerset Park
Project Description Page 27
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-3: Site Opportunities - Existing City Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Site Vision / Park Site Enhancement Opportunities
Immediate Short Term Longer Term
City Parks and Facilities
COMMUNITY PARKS
Memorial Park
Community hub and multi-
use, civic-focused event
space
Immediate: Engage the public in developing a site master
plan for Memorial Park as a community hub and multi-use,
civic-focused event space. Include the presence of
Quinlan Community Center, Senior Center, Sports Center
in planning Memorial Park as a community space. Consider
repurposing the inactive pond, renovating the
amphitheater, adding walking path improvements and
playable water feature, enhancing the tree canopy,
integrating natural features, and renovating, adding and/or
expanding recreation facilities to enhance indoor and
outdoor event space, community gathering space,
active/healthy recreation uses and play opportunities.
Clarify the role of memorials at this site, addressing
opportunities to make a community-building statement
and/or tribute to community cohesiveness.
Short term: Implement Phase 1 improvements in the
pond/amphitheater area. Consider nature integration, shade,
ADA accessibility, pathway and seating improvements,
amphitheater improvements, pond re-purposing, and other
elements consistent with the site master plan process.
Longer term: Phase in additional improvements, based
on the site master plan, including improvements to
existing facilities, development of any selected major new
facilities, and the addition of recreation opportunities.
Pending the site master plan, this may potentially include
major facilities such as an aquatic facility,
gymnasium/recreation center, senior center expansion
and/or a potential performing/fine arts center at this site,
or as an expansion of an adjacent recreation building that
would affect this site (Sports Center, Senior Center e.g.),
as well as the addition or repurposing of facilities. Provide
connections to proposed trails, bike lanes and bike
routes.
Stevens Creek Corridor Park
Community-focused
natural area supporting
environmental education,
outdoor gathering and
recreation consistent with
protecting wildlife and
habitat value
Immediate: Complete Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
Short term: Phase in improvements as guided by the site
master plan, enhancing natural/habitat areas and facilities
supporting
environmental education, gatherings and recreation uses,
while retaining the natural character of the park. Provide
connections to any extension of the Stevens Creek Trail &
nearby bikeways. Provide trailhead amenities. Stabilize east
creek bank at 22050 Stevens Creek Blvd. per results of the
concept design project, using methods similar to those
employed in upstream restoration. Complete feasibility work
& if approved pursue implementation of improved pedestrian
& bicycle access to Blackberry Farm Park via San Fernando
Ave. Evaluate steps for expanded use of Blackberry Farm.
Longer term: Implement renovation of Stocklmeir Ranch,
Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry Farm Park,
and/ or McClellan Ranch Preserve and West and other
corridor parcels, consistent with the recommendations of
the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Creekside Park Neighborhood recreation
and sports hub
Short term: Consider adding nature play and/or inclusive play
elements to the existing play area. Consider other
enhancements to outdoor recreation diversity. Evaluate
opportunities to enhance the recreation building and
reactivate or repurpose the concession area. Sustain existing
uses.
Longer term: Coordinate with results of Public Works'
Facility Condition and Use Assessment to modify the
recreation building as needed. Refresh sports fields to
maintain site use as a sports hub. Consider artificial turf
or other enhancements to increase the playing capacity.
Consider adding a full basketball court, other sports
courts, and diverse recreation elements to support sports
and active uses. Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to existing/proposed off-street trail and
proposed buffered bike lane.
Project Description Page 28
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-3: Site Opportunities - Existing City Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Site Vision / Park Site Enhancement Opportunities
Immediate Short Term Longer Term
Hoover Park
Neighborhood park and
recreation and sports
space
Short term: Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Consider adding a community garden and
diverse recreation elements. Consider providing a
larger/full-size basketball court. Consider a looped
walking path and restrooms.
Jollyman Park
Neighborhood and
community hub for sports,
recreation programs and
activities
Short term: Pursue adding an all-inclusive play area, grouped
seating, a picnic shelter, continuous all-weather loop path
(that includes the east part of the park), and neighborhood-
serving event utilities and infrastructure. Sustain existing
uses. Respond to community request for trial off-leash dog
area.
Longer term: Consider additional diverse amenities, such
as outdoor fitness equipment/parcourse or a full-size
basketball court. Provide connections to bikeway
improvements on Stelling Rd. Consider for location of
development of major new facilities.
Linda Vista Park
Neighborhood and
community hub for
picnicking and nature-
based recreation
Short term: Select design concept to repair or repurpose the
inactive ponds. Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Repair or renovate the ponds (per 2014
technical report). Consider adding neighborhood-serving
event utilities and infrastructure, a picnic shelter or
pavilion, a destination nature play and/or water play area,
and diverse recreation elements, potentially including
adventure and challenge elements. Consider a
community or demonstration, healing or rain garden.
Provide trailhead amenities and connections to the
proposed off-street trail. Consider installing outdoor
exercise equipment in addition to, or as replacement for,
existing parcourse equipment.
Monta Vista Park & Recreation
Center
Neighborhood recreation
and sports hub
Short term: In conjunction with major facility business plans,
if pursued, explore opportunities to relocate or expand the
gymnastics/martial arts & preschool programs to other
facilities. Consider temporary options to expand play
opportunities near the preschool. Consider restriping tennis
court(s) to share for pickleball. Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Address renovation or replacement of the
existing multi-use and preschool buildings based on
major facility recommendations and in coordination with
Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
Consider adding a half or full basketball court, picnic
shelter, neighborhood-serving event utilities and
infrastructure, and other diverse recreation elements.
Provide connections to proposed buffered bikeway.
Portal Park Neighborhood park and
gathering space
Short term: Improve walkway lighting and signage. Explore
options to share adjacent school parking. Sustain existing
uses.
Longer term: Consider adding shading to the picnic area,
grouped seating, nature play area and/or inclusive play
elements, and diverse recreation elements, such as
badminton, bocce/lawn bowling, and/or games to support
small group gatherings. Improve connections to the
adjacent school. Re-evaluate the location and use of the
recreation building, considering relocating the building or
the preschool-age and child programming or adding
indoor restrooms, and in coordination with Public Works'
Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Provide
connections to the proposed bike boulevard and adjacent
neighborhoods.
Project Description Page 29
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-3: Site Opportunities - Existing City Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Site Vision / Park Site Enhancement Opportunities
Immediate Short Term Longer Term
Varian Park
Neighborhood park with
tennis, passive recreation,
orchard and habitat focus
Short term: Consider expanding or replacing play area with
nature play area and/or thematic or inclusive play elements.
Consider restriping tennis court(s) to share for pickleball.
Consider other enhancements for outdoor recreation
diversity. Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Consider diverse recreation elements
focused on passive uses and nature education. Consider
community garden, outdoor classroom, pollinator patches
and interpretive signage. Maintain connections to
adjacent school. Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to proposed bikeway.
Wilson Park
Neighborhood and
community hub for sports,
recreation and activities
Short term: Consider adding neighborhood-serving event
utilities and infrastructure, picnic shelter, and a large/full-size
basketball court. Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Evaluate use of and desirability of
renovating/replacing the ceramics building, particularly if
ceramics can be incorporated into a fine arts or
recreation facility, and in coordination with Public Works'
Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Consider a
wider, maintenance-friendly loop path, community
garden, variety of sports courts, activity hubs, and
diverse recreation elements, including those that provide
challenge elements. Consider full-size basketball court.
Provide trailhead amenities and connections to nearby
bikeways and proposed off-street trail. If desired, a sport
field can fit on the east portion of the site (with relocation
of the central play area and picnicking reconfiguration).
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Canyon Oak Park Play node for local use Short and longer term: Maintain orientation to the view of open space. Sustain existing uses.
Franco Park Neighborhood park Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses. Consider adding shade and small group seating area. Improve pedestrian
and bicycle access from Franco Court; evaluate possible on-street parking and crosswalk to Franco Court access point.
Little Rancho Park Play node for local use Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses.
Somerset Park Neighborhood park Short term: Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Consider adding a community garden, dog
area, and/ or larger basketball area or other amenities.
Provide trailhead amenities and connections to the De
Anza Trail if it is implemented.
Sterling Barnhart Park Play node with trail
connection
Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses. Consider effects of an extension of Saratoga Creek Trail or the acquisition
of Lawrence-Mitty property, if pursued.
Three Oaks Park Neighborhood park with
nature emphasis Short term: Sustain existing uses.
Longer term: Look to address successional tree plantings
to maintain character. Consider adding nature play area
and/or inclusive elements and repurposing or improving
the southeasterly rock play area. Consider adding
neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure,
and diversifying recreation opportunities.
Project Description Page 30
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-3: Site Opportunities - Existing City Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Site Vision / Park Site Enhancement Opportunities
Immediate Short Term Longer Term
SPECIAL USE SITES
Civic Center
Civic Center /Community Hall
Multi-use civic space for
gathering and
programming
Short and longer term: Evaluate Civic Center Master Plan in relation to major new facility discussions to clarify use of
Civic Center, and adjacent areas. Sustain existing uses in the short term.
Library Field
Multi-use civic area for
green space, recreation,
and gatherings
Short term: Sustain existing uses pending decision on
implementation of Civic Center Master Plan and cricket field
long-term location. Consider creating a separate parcel for
Library Field and rezoning it as PR zoning (park and
recreation).
Longer term: Consider the addition of major facilities,
relocation of cricket field if a better site is identified, and
long-term options as civic center-related event space or
permanent green space. Consider whether adjacent
parking can be put underground to expand Library Field
& green space.
Mary Avenue Dog Park Dog park and gathering
site for dog owners/friends
Short and longer term: Enhance existing use. Consider adding shade, varied terrain, small group seating areas, dog
amenities.
Cupertino Sports Center Indoor/outdoor sports hub
Short term: Implement seismic upgrades. Consider
implementing improvements to the locker rooms, showers,
restrooms, and reception area approved in the 2018-19
budget. Revisit site use in the Memorial Park Master Plan
and facility business plan associated with the development of
a Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use Recreation Center and/or
Aquatics Center, if proposed for Memorial Park, and consider
opportunities for a combined facility. Plan to re-locate the
teen center to a different location to optimize teen access and
re-purpose teen area for sport uses.
Longer term: Renovate the facility, potentially adding
recreation uses compatible with the Memorial Park
Master Plan, any related facility business plan, and
Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
TRAIL CORRIDORS
Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian
Bridge & Trail
Regional connectivity and
native plantings
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school and trail, and regional destinations. Consider improved
habitat plantings that provide year-round beauty and seasonal interest.
Creekside Park and Regnart Creek
Trail
Local connectivity, park
access and riparian
corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities, enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor, and adding green
infrastructure.
Saratoga Creek Trail Regional connectivity and
riparian corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities, enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor, and adding green
infrastructure. Encourage connections to regional destinations.
Stevens Creek Trail
Local connectivity, park
access and riparian
corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities and green infrastructure. Encourage connections between trail,
City parks, County parks and nearby schools. Work with the County to implement a pedestrian-bicycle access to Rancho
San Antonio from Stevens Creek Blvd. with parking/trailhead amenities per the adopted Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens
Creek Trail Feasibility Study. Continue to implement habitat restoration and to protect the riparian corridor. Install
interpretive signage/ elements including for historical resources.
SCHOOL FIELDS (Currently managed by City)
Collins Elementary School Sports fields and recreation
facilities Short and longer term: Encourage connections and shared uses between school and Portal Park. Pursue partnerships
with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to address nearby needs.
Project Description Page 31
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-3: Site Opportunities - Existing City Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Site Vision / Park Site Enhancement Opportunities
Immediate Short Term Longer Term
Encourage connections to proposed bikeways. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to
broaden sharing of facilities.
Eaton Elementary School Sports fields and recreation
facilities
Short and longer term: Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Encourage connections to proposed bikeway.
Faria Elementary School Sports fields and recreation
facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation
facilities to address nearby needs. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing
of facilities.
Garden Gate Elementary School Sports fields and recreation
facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation
facilities to address nearby needs. Encourage connections to proposed bikeway. Continue joint-use agreement for sport
field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Hyde Middle School Sports fields and recreation
facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District at Hyde Middle and/or nearby Sedgewick Elementary to
improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities. Encourage connections to proposed bikeway. Continue
joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Kennedy Middle School
Sports fields, recreation
facilities and trail/school
access
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school, proposed De Anza Trail if implemented, and nearby
parks. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Lincoln Elementary School Sports fields and recreation
facilities
Short and longer term: Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Encourage connections to proposed bikeway.
Regnart Elementary School
Sports fields, recreation
facilities and trail/school
access
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school, proposed trail if implemented, and nearby parks. Pursue
partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities. Continue joint-use
agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Stevens Creek Elementary School
Sports fields, recreation
facilities, park/school
connections, trail/school
access.
Short and longer term: Encourage connections and shared uses between school and Varian Park and connections to
proposed bikeway. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.
Project Description Page 32
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-4 New Park & Recreation Facility Matrix *
OPPORTUNITY POTENTIAL ELEMENTS SITING/ DISTRIBUTION PROJECT APPROACH
Potential New Parks
Neighborhood Parks
If opportunities arise, acquire and develop
new neighborhood parks especially in
targeted underserved areas.
-play opportunities-seating
-green space/open lawn
-small group gathering space/picnic area
-looped walking path
-game space
-active-use courts as space allows
-neighborhood-serving amenities
-landscaping/native plantings
Develop 1-3 parks. Prioritize
underserved areas especially in north
and east Cupertino per findings
regarding underserved areas.
Numbers of parks and size may vary
depending on opportunities. Strive to
acquire 3.5+ acres if possible.
Short term: Explore joint use agreements with schools
and/or other partners to improve access to existing
facilities especially in underserved areas. Evaluate
opportunities to acquire or partner to develop any
vacant School District parcels. Acquire site(s), or
develop agreements to foster public use of existing or
partner facilities, as opportunities arise. Pursue
acquisition of Lawrence-Mitty parcels on the west side
of Lawrence Expressway. Engage the public in creating
site concepts and develop site(s). Consider during
acquisition whether neighborhood park guidelines can
be met. (Refer to Master Plan objectives for guidelines
for acquisition.) Encourage creative solutions to
providing park and recreation spaces, including
consideration of smaller spaces.
Longer term: Continue to acquire site(s) as
opportunities arise. Engage public in creating site
concepts and develop site(s). Consider during
acquisition whether neighborhood park guidelines can
be met.
Potential New Trails
Trails and Trail Corridors
Coordinate to develop trails from the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, regional plans and this
Master Plan that support multi-use
recreation, park access and connectivity to
community destinations.
-accessible, firm and stable multi-use, off-road
trails
-signage/wayfinding
-distance/mileage markers
-information kiosks
-crossings
-seating
-interpretive elements or art
-outdoor fitness equipment/par course elements
-adjacent soft-surfaced jogging trail
-green infrastructure
-wider corridor for greenspace protection or
riparian enhancement
Prioritize connections between parks,
schools, and trails; extensions of
existing trails; gap closures; and
completing loop trails.
Short term: Identify project priorities. Explore joint use
agreements with SCVWD that support implementation
of creek trails. Continue to pursue opportunities for
planned trail development. Require dedication or
easements for trails as part of the development review
process, where appropriate. Dedicate or acquire open
space along creeks and utility corridors for trails through
regional cooperation, grants and private development
review. Emphasize implementation of the Cupertino
Loop Trail.
Longer term: Build more trails and improve trail
corridors. Connect parks via walkways to nearby trails
and ensure key parks include trailhead amenities.
Continue to pursue opportunities for planned trail
development. Require dedication or easements for trails
as part of the development review process, where
appropriate. Dedicate or acquire open space along
creeks and utility corridors for trails through regional
cooperation, grants and private development review.
Project Description Page 33
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-4 New Park & Recreation Facility Matrix *
OPPORTUNITY POTENTIAL ELEMENTS SITING/ DISTRIBUTION PROJECT APPROACH
Potential New Major Features
Aquatics Facility
Explore partnership opportunities to provide
year-round aquatics. If a new facility is
warranted and desired in the future, provide
year-round swimming facility designed for
recreation and instructional swimming,
aquatic exercise / lap swimming, and pool
events.
-lap pool
-warm water instructional pool
-recreation pool
-hot tub
-zero depth entry
-lazy river
-water play features
-support spaces such as lifeguard/office space,
locker rooms, family changing rooms, outdoor
showers, storage, mechanical space,
lounge/spectator areas
-cost recovery features such as all-purpose
spaces, birthday party rooms, concessions, and
rental features
-nearby parking
If pursed, develop one facility in an
accessible location; consider sites in
central and east Cupertino or
opportunities to co-develop with
another centralized major facility to
increase programming options.
Provide parking and access via
arterial/collector street, ideally near
transit.
Provide a minimum of 2-3 acres.
Could be co-located with another
identified proposed or existing facility.
Short term: Pursue opportunities to partner with existing
aquatics providers including schools. If a new city facility
is desired, prepare a market analysis and business plan
to evaluate site selection and program elements and
define anticipated operating costs. Phasing to be
dependent on business plan. Explore acquisition
opportunities. Consider as part of the Memorial Park
Master Plan. Consider opportunities to combine with the
existing Sports Center and/or a new Gymnasium/multi-
use recreation center.
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a year-round
aquatics facility.
Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use Recreation
Facility
Explore partnership opportunities to provide
gym space. If a new facility is warranted and
desired in the future, provide a multi-
generational gymnasium complex and
recreation center to provide sports court
spaces and support other activities.
-full size basketball court(s) with bleachers and
dividing walls
-volleyball, badminton, pickleball space or
overlays
-fitness studios
-gymnastics space
-multipurpose rooms for smaller court sports and
other activities
-senior fitness room
-multi-purpose rooms (reservable) and meeting
rooms
-program space
-social space/coffee kiosk
-teen room
-childcare room
-possible additional features such as climbing
wall; rooftop/elevated track
-locker rooms, family changing rooms
-office space
-lobby/front desk/reception
-equipment room and storage
-nearby parking
If pursued, develop one centrally
located facility; could be co-located or
combined with other major facilities.
Ensure additional space for parking
and grounds with access via
arterial/collector street. Nearby transit
desirable. This facility would have
synergy with an Aquatics Center or a
Teen Center.
Short term: Pursue partnership and joint use
opportunities to provide gym space. If a new gym/multi-
use rec center is desired, prepare a market analysis and
business plan to evaluate site selection and program
elements and define anticipated operating costs.
Consider as part of the Memorial Park Master Plan.
Consider opportunities to combine with the existing
Sports Center and/or a new Gymnasium/multi-use
recreation center.
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a multi-generational
gymnasium and multi-use recreation center complex.
Consider multi-story design solutions and rooftop use.
Project Description Page 34
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-4 New Park & Recreation Facility Matrix *
OPPORTUNITY POTENTIAL ELEMENTS SITING/ DISTRIBUTION PROJECT APPROACH
Performing/Fine Arts Center
Explore partnership opportunities to provide
performing/fine arts space. If a new facility is
warranted and desired in the future, develop
a community auditorium and/or fine and
performing arts center to house community-
scale performances and support daytime arts
and recreation programs as well as evening
programs and events.
-industry-standard stage
-professional lighting
-sloped floor, fixed seating
-pull-down screen
-dressing rooms
-restrooms
-backstage storage
-box office, lobby, concessions
-smaller theater/rehearsal space
-dance studio/floor
-recording & television studio
-arts wing for drawing, painting, photography,
theater, dance, music/voice lessons
-arts/crafts/ceramics spaces
-practice/instruction rooms
-reservable multi-purpose room-dance
studio/floor
-maker/incubator space (computer lab, graphics
& animation studio, industrial shop)
-catering kitchen
-offices
-storage
-outdoor (or indoor/outdoor) event space or art
plaza
-ceramics/crafts/art spaces
-nearby parking
If pursued, develop one facility in a
centralized location near businesses,
restaurants and/or attractions.
Consider space near potential
partners, Cupertino's civic center, or
nightlife-oriented downtown areas.
Ensure additional space for parking
and grounds with access via
arterial/collector street and ideally
near transit.
May be co-located with other major
facilities (e.g., community center,
senior center), but typically lacks
synergy with other active uses (e.g.,
sports fields, gymnasiums, and
swimming pools).
Short term: Explore partnership and joint use
opportunities with high schools and DeAnza College or
other potential partners with existing performing arts
space to meet immediate needs. If a new city facility is
desired, prepare a market analysis and business plan to
evaluate site selection and potential program elements
and define anticipated operating costs.
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a performing and fine
arts center with arts wing.
Enhanced Teen Space or Services Create unique teen space that may include
student union-style gathering and program
space and/or active indoor use for teens.
-study room
-café
-computer lab and/or video gaming game room-
meeting/program space
-open gym; basketball hoop
-kitchen
Location near a middle and/or high
school, library or shopping/downtown
area. Consider Library/Civic Center,
high school/middle school corridors,
and Wilson & Creekside parks. Do
not develop as a stand-alone facility.
Consider co-locating with gymnasium
complex, performing/ fine arts center,
incubator/ maker space or other
major facility.
Short term: Continue to refine and expand teen
services. Maintain existing teen center facility without
significant reinvestment. Coordinate with the School
District on the Lawson Teen Center Pilot Program for
mobile recreation options. Consider other partnership
opportunities to create a unique teen space in
Cupertino. Consider a trial project to test teen interest in
teen amenities at Creekside Park.
Longer term: Integrate teen uses into a multi-
generational facility or new teen space if pursued, and
repurpose the existing Teen Center. Continue hosting
teen activities at school sites and other locations
besides the Teen Center.
Project Description Page 35
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 2-4 New Park & Recreation Facility Matrix *
OPPORTUNITY POTENTIAL ELEMENTS SITING/ DISTRIBUTION PROJECT APPROACH
Potential Major Facility Enhancements
Expanded Senior Center or Services
Provide additional recreation space for older
adults, and both frail and active seniors.
Incorporate senior space into a multi-
generation facility, such as gymnasium
complex/recreation center, if such a facility is
pursued in the future.
-2-story addition with elevator access to second
floor (if existing center expanded)
-exercise rooms or half-court gym space
-multi-age programming space for frail to active
seniors
-arts & crafts room
-music rooms of different sizes with presentation
capacity
-additional classrooms and meeting rooms
-private consultation/health/conference room
-front desk/reception area
-office space
-storage
-accessible parking and drop off areas
-parking lot circulation improvements
-outdoor low impact game space, gardens, and
activity areas
If warranted, expand existing Senior
Center, and consider other locations
to expand distribution of senior
activities. Co-locate senior activities
in other recreation areas to
encourage multi-age programming as
well as a range of offerings for frail to
active seniors.
Short term: Conduct survey to evaluate interest in
alternative locations as well as alternative recreation
opportunities for seniors; explore potential locations
based on results. Develop mobile activities as a test
pilot to gauge interest in new locations and new
programs. Explore partnership opportunities. Conduct a
facility evaluation to evaluate facility renovations that
would enhance the function, capacity and financial
sustainability of the Senior Center.
Longer term: Consider potential Senior Center
renovations, and providing older adult recreation with a
multigenerational gymnasium complex, performing/fine
arts center, or other major facilities if pursued.
Other Replaced or Repurposed Existing Building Re-evaluate and consider replacement or
repurposing of existing aging, worn or
underperforming buildings in conjunction with
the development of new facilities.
-range of options including removing or replacing
buildings with new buildings or additional
recreational facilities
-projects dependent on major facility
development and considerations"
Re-evaluate the following aging
facilities:
-Monta Vista buildings (multi-use &
preschool buildings)
-Wilson Park ceramics building
-Portal Park stand-alone building
-Stevens Creek Corridor Park aging
infrastructure, consistent with
outcomes of Stevens Creek Corridor
Master Plan (Stocklmeir Ranch
house, Blue Pheasant/Pro Shop,
Blackberry Farm pool complex,
McClellan Ranch Barn, former
residence at 22050 Stevens Creek
Blvd., etc.)
Short term: Continue to maintain existing facility without
significant reinvestment. Consider reuse of buildings
and space in conjunction with other major facilities.
Coordinate with results of Public Works' Facility
Condition and Use Assessment.
Longer term: Renovate, replace or relocate buildings as
needed.
* Note: Sites will be determined through site master plans, trails plans and other decision-making processes based on community priorities, the availability of project resources and site opportunities emerging over time. All sites should consider access,
transportation, parking and transit needs.
** Note: The actual phasing and sequencing of projects is opportunity-driven and may vary depending on funding, site master plans recommendations, business planning, partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities and similar variables. Longer term
projects may be moved to the short term under the right circumstances.
Longer term projects may be moved to the short term under the right circumstances.
Project Description Page 36
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page left blank intentionally
Project Description Page 37
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Improved Outdoor Event Space – Provide space to support large or small group events,
programs, and outdoor classes.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•All community and large neighborhood parks except for Stevens Creek Corridor Park
•Three Oaks Park
•Civic Center Plaza/Library Field
•Public Private Partnership
•Joint Use Facility
Gardens – Provide more opportunities for various types of gardens including community
gardens.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•Creekside Park
•Jollyman Park
•Wilson Park
•Stevens Creek Corridor Park
•Portal Park
•Monta Vista Park
•Linda Vista Park
•Hoover Park
•Varian Park
•Three Oaks Park
•Somerset Park
•Joint-Use Facility
Outdoor Recreation Diversity – Add facilities which appeal to Cupertino’s diverse population and
reflect Cupertino’s unique character.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•All suitable City parks
Sports and Recreation Facilities – Diversify recreation and sports opportunities (multi-use sports
fields, basketball courts, pickleball courts e.g.).
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•Sport-oriented City parks
•Other suitable City parks
•School fields
•Other partnerships
•Indoor gym space in local schools if available
Dog Park(s)/Dog Off-Leash Areas(s) – Provide additional dog parks, smaller dog runs, and/or
off-leash areas.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•Creekside Park
•Jollyman Park
•Wilson Park
•Portal Park
•Monta Vista Park
•Linda Vista Park
•Hoover Park
Project Description Page 38
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
•Varian Park
•Three Oaks Park
•Somerset Park
•Potential Acquisition or Joint-Use Facility
Natural Vegetation Recommendations – Integrate natural plantings and reduce turf areas where
not actively used for recreation.
Potential Locations/Opportunities
•All City parks
2.7 SCOPE OF CEQA REVIEW
The Master Plan identifies opportunities for park improvements and development and is
intended to guide the City in allocating resources for future enhancement, renovation, and
management of City park and recreation facilities through the year 2040. The key components
of the Master Plan are vision and goals, systemwide objectives and actions, opportunities for
improving the parks and recreation system (including acquisition of new parks and potential
major new facilities as well as smaller enhancements), and associated implementation actions.
The Master Plan establishes a policy framework to support decision-making that concerns the
physical development of the City’s parks. The Master Plan contains a number of goals and
actions that do not have the potential to affect the environment as analyzed under CEQA and
are not considered in detail in this document (see Chapter 3 of the Master Plan for a complete
list of goals, objectives and actions).
This IS/MND focuses on Master Plan goals, objectives, actions, and enhancement opportunities
that have the potential to cause environmental impacts when implemented (see Table 2-2 and
Table 2-3). While the Master Plan identifies types and potential locations of park improvements
contemplated, it does not present project-level design plans for any specific improvement or
project. In the absence of project-level information, this IS/MND identifies general areas of
potential environmental impacts that could occur from implementation of the Master Plan, and
identifies how existing City policies, programs, and procedures, as well as regulatory standards
and programmatic procedures, would reduce or avoid environmental impacts. Where a
potentially significant impact is identified, the impact analysis identifies programmatic mitigation
measures that would be applied to future projects to reduce or prevent environmental impacts.
Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction
of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once project-level information is
developed for improvements proposed to be implemented under the opportunities identified in
the Master Plan, the City would review the project under CEQA and determine the appropriate
level of environmental review. In the absence of even conceptual-level design and
implementation information at this time, this IS/MND cannot evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of some of the actions contemplated in the Master Plan. Future review of
these projects would focus on site-specific environmental issues that could not be examined in
sufficient detail as part of this IS/MND. When a specific, proposed project is pursued on school
district-owned property, the City and the school district would determine which entity would be
the CEQA lead agency, and what the appropriate CEQA determination for the project would be.
Certain types of improvements or modifications identified in the Master Plan are considered
small in scale and may not be projects under CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 Project),
may qualify for exemptions, or may be covered by this IS/MND. These types of small-scale
projects/improvements may include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Improving walking trails within parks;
•Adding shade to existing parks;
•Replacing/Improving play equipment;
Project Description Page 39
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
•Removal/replacement of existing picnic tables;
•Construction of new restrooms or other small structures in parks;
•Incorporation of sustainable practices in the maintenance and management of parks;
•Improvement of landscaping with sustainable plantings or native planting providing
wildlife habitat,
•Improvements that may assist the City in meeting or exceeding Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements;
•Improvement of trail connections and access;
•Development of fitness areas in parks;
•Integration of nature into parks;
•Enhancement of seating areas in parks;
•Enhancement of existing sports fields (excluding field lighting, additional evening
events, or increase in spectators);
•Creation of wayfinding signage or safe routes to parks;
•Replacing, renovating, or repurposing buildings within the parks and recreation
system.
2.8 PUBLIC AGENCIES APPROVAL REQUIRED
The City of Cupertino is the lead agency with jurisdiction over adoption and implementation of
the Master Plan and certification of the CEQA document. During implementation of any physical
improvements requiring additional City review or permits, the City will follow its adopted plans
and policies, as well as any state and regional requirements for the control of environmental
impacts. In addition, permits or other approvals may be required from regulatory agencies (such
as Caltrans, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Santa
Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water), Regional Water Quality Control Board) depending on
the nature of the specific project and the location in which it occurs.
2.9 CUPERTINO STANDARD DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MEASURES
The City would design and construct all Master Plan enhancement opportunities consistent with
all relevant federal, state, regional, and local regulations aimed at preventing or reducing
environmental impacts. Table 2-5 City of Cupertino Standard Design and Construction
Measures lists standard measures that would be incorporated into park design and construction
projects with the intent of ensuring all park projects are carried out consistent with relevant
regulations.
Table 2-5 City of Cupertino Standard Design and Construction Measures
Resource
Area Condition
Air Quality
Fugitive Dust. To reduce potential fugitive dust that may be generated by project
construction activities, the City of Cupertino will implement the most current version
of the BAAQMD Basic Construction Measures when ground disturbing activities
have the potential to generate fugitive dust. The current Basic Construction
Measures are provided below:
•All active construction areas will be watered twice daily or more often if
necessary. Increased watering frequency will be required whenever wind
speeds exceed 15 miles-per-hour.
•Cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand, and any other materials that can be
windblown. Trucks transporting these materials will be covered.
•All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads will be removed
using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day or as often
as necessary to keep them free of dust and debris associated with site
construction. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
Project Description Page 40
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Resource
Area Condition
• Subsequent to clearing, grading, or excavating, exposed portions of the site
will be watered, landscaped, treated with soil stabilizers, or covered as soon
as possible. Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive
construction areas and previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more.
• Installation of sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt
runoff to public roadways.
• Replanting of vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible after
completion of construction.
• Idling times will be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in
use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes. Clear signage will
be provided for construction workers at all access points.
• All construction equipment will be maintained and properly tuned in
accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment will be checked
by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition
prior to operation.
• Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact
at the City of Cupertino regarding dust complaints. This person will respond
and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD’s phone number
will also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
Air Quality
Construction Emission Reduction/Energy Efficiency Best Management
Practices:
To reduce construction equipment related fuel consumption and emissions of criteria
air pollutants, toxic air contaminants, and GHGs, the City shall implement the
following best management practices:
Where possible, electrical service shall be provided to construction work areas to
avoid the need to power equipment with generators.
The design shall be energy efficient consistent with the City’s Climate Action Plan
and incorporate sustainable energy design elements including, but not limited to:
• Exterior energy design elements;
• Internal lighting service and climatic control systems; and
• Building siting and landscape elements.
Hazardous
Materials
Contaminated Soils.
• During the design phase of a project the City will conduct screening
research to ensure the proposed project would not be located on or
immediately adjacent to unremediated contaminated soils. The City will
conduct a search of all lists of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5, including the List of
Hazardous Waste and Substances sites from Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database, List of Leaking
Underground Storage Tank Sites by County and Fiscal Year from Water
Board GeoTracker database, and List of hazardous waste facilities
subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health
and Safety Code, identified by DTSC, during the design phase of
recommended projects in order to identify any active remediation sites.
The design will consider the findings of this search.
• For park projects that meet the criteria for a grading permit, the City shall
investigate whether the project would be located in areas of past
agricultural use and if so, perform soil sampling consistent with state and
County regulations to determine if past agricultural activities caused soil
contamination.
Project Description Page 41
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Resource
Area Condition
Water
Quality
• Erosion Control. Park projects will be designed in accordance with the
most current Chapter 9.18 Stormwater Pollution Prevention and
Watershed Protection of the Municipal Code, as applicable, and the most
current Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES permit. Projects will be
constructed in accordance with the most current version of Section 7.20
Storm Water Pollution Control of the General Conditions of the City’s
Public Works contract documents. Construction plans will include the
City of Cupertino, Public Works Department “Construction Best
Management Practices” plan sheet.
• Green Stormwater Infrastructure. Park projects will be designed
consistent with the City’s Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Plan
(adopted Sep. 2019).
Noise
Construction Noise. Construction projects will be carried out in conformance with
the most current version of Chapter 10.48 of the Municipal Code, Community Noise
Control. The current language is provided below.
• Section 10.48.051, Landscape Maintenance Activities, states that the use of
motorized equipment for landscape maintenance activities for public
schools, public and private golf courses, and public facilities is limited to the
hours of 7 AM to 8 PM on weekdays and 7 AM to 6 PM on weekends and
holidays.
• Section 10.48.053, Grading, Construction, and Demolition sets forth
standards for construction-related noise:
1. Grading, construction and demolition activities shall be allowed to
exceed the noise limits of Section 10.48.040 during daytime hours (7
AM to 8 PM on weekdays and 9 AM to 6 PM on weekends) provided
that the equipment utilized has high-quality noise muffler and
abatement devices installed and in good condition, and the activity
meets one of the following two criteria: 1) No individual device
produces a noise level more than 87 dBA at a distance of 25 feet; or
2) The noise level on any nearby property does not exceed 80 dBA.
2. Grading, street construction, demolition, and underground utility
work are prohibited within 750 feet of a residential area on
weekends, holidays, and during the nighttime period (8 PM to 7 AM
on weekdays and 6 PM to 9 AM on weekends). This restriction does
not apply to emergency work activities as defined by Section
10.48.030 of the Municipal Code.
3. Construction, other than street construction (and certain emergency
work activities), is prohibited on holidays.
4. Construction, other than street construction (and certain emergency
work activities) is prohibited during nighttime periods unless it meets
the nighttime standards in Section 10.48.040.
• Park Usage Noise. Chapter 13.04, Parks Section 13.04.190, Closing Hours
– Prohibitions, states that no person shall remain, stay, or loiter in any public
park between the hours of 10 PM and 6 AM, unless otherwise posted at the
public park.
Traffic Control
Traffic Control. For all construction projects affecting vehicle, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation patterns, the contractor will provide vehicle traffic control
measures to ensure safety and vehicle flow during construction, and which
ensure public safety and provide for adequate access to public rights-of-way
during construction. All construction projects will require the construction
contractor to comply with the most current version of Section 7.21 Traffic Control
and Public Safety of the General Conditions of the City’s Public Works contract
documents which require contractors to give adequate warning to the public of
construction and to maintain access to public rights-of-way during construction.
Project Description Page 42
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
In addition to the measures listed in Table 2-5, the City uses several documents to specify
standard measures for City sponsored construction projects. These standard measures are
specified in City construction contracts and serve to eliminate or reduce environmental impacts
associated with construction projects, some of which are intended to ensure the City complies
with state and federal laws regarding air emissions, storm water pollution prevention, and
hazardous materials handling and storage at construction sites. These measures are found in
the documents listed below. Over the life of the Master Plan, however, the City may revise the
language of these documents, or add new measures, in order to respond to changing
environmental and regulatory conditions. As the City initiates design and construction of park
enhancement opportunities, these measures would be incorporated into the project description
and implemented as part of the appropriate phase of the project.
The current City documents containing standard measures consist of:
• Department of Public Works Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Water Course Protection (pursuant to City
Municipal Code Chapter 9.18) (dated September 1, 2016)
• City of Cupertino Public Works Department, Standard Details for Construction within City
right-of-way. Undated.
• City of Cupertino Public Works Contract Documents, General Conditions of Project
Manual (standard construction contract language)
These documents can be found at: www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/public-
works/engineering-standards-policies-procedures.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 43
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Chapter 3. Environmental Checklist and Responses
1. Project Title: Cupertino Parks & Recreation System Master Plan
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Cupertino
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager
Department of Public Works
parksmp@cupertino.org
(408) 777-3120
4. Project Location: City of Cupertino
5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:
City of Cupertino
Public Works Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
6. General Plan Designation: N/A
7. Zoning: N/A
Description of the Project: The City proposes to adopt and implement the City of Cupertino
(City) Parks and Recreation System Master Plan (Master Plan) which identifies
opportunities for park improvements and development and is needed to provide overall
guidance for long-term decision making by City staff.
The Master Plan is intended to ensure that the park and recreation system meets the
needs of the Cupertino community, and to guide the City in allocating resources for future
development, renovation, and management of City parks and recreation facilities through
the year 2040. The key components of the Master Plan are vision and goals, systemwide
objectives and actions, enhancement opportunities, and implementation actions. The
Master Plan is focused on City owned or managed developed parks and recreation
facilities in Cupertino, and does not cover non-City owned natural open spaces, or non-
City owned assets such as county and regional parks. The Master Plan does identify
enhancement opportunities for joint City/School District improvements to school district
facilities, primarily sport fields that are covered an existing City/School District agreement.
8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project’s surroundings):
The Master Plan encompasses all City-owned or City-managed park and recreation
facilities. City parks are found in residential areas, mixed use areas, and commercial
areas.
9. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval,
or participation agreement.). No other agencies have approval authority over the Master
Plan.
10. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the
project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code
section21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example,
the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures
regarding confidentiality, etc.? The City of Cupertino has not received a request from a
Native American tribe for consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section
21080.3.1.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 44
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
Aesthetics Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Public Services
Agricultural and
Forestry Resources Hazards and Hazardous
Materials Recreation
Air Quality Hydrology/Water Quality Transportation
Biological Resources Land Use/Planning Tribal Cultural
Resources
Cultural Resources Mineral Resources Utilities/Service Systems
Energy Noise Wildfire
Geology/Soils Population/Housing Mandatory Findings of
Significance
Environmental Checklist and Responses
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
� I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because revisions in
the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
D I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the ervironment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addressed.
D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier El� or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Printed Name
Agency
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project
Initial Study I Mitigated Negative Declaration
Date
JK,n_ Yo,c
Title
City of Cupertino
Page 45
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 46
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page left blank intentionally
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 47
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.1 AESTHETICS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:*
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage points.) If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
*Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099
3.1.1 Environmental Setting
The City of Cupertino is situated on the mid-peninsula in the south Bay Area. Cupertino borders
San Jose and Santa Clara to the east, Saratoga to the south, and Sunnyvale and Los Altos to
the north. As of the 2010 census, the City had a land area of 11.26 square miles (US Census
Bureau 2010). The topography of the City and the surrounding vicinity is generally flat because
the City lies in the west-central part of the Santa Clara Valley, which has a broad, mostly flush
alluvial plain that extends southward from San Francisco Bay. Linda Vista Park is the only City
park not situated on largely flat land. The Santa Cruz Mountains rise up to the west and provide
a visual backdrop for the majority of the City. Cupertino is further defined by its largely urban
setting.
Scenic Highway Corridors
There are no state-designated scenic highways within the City.
Sensitive Scenic and Visual Resources
The City defines scenic vistas and scenic corridors in the following manner (page 4.1-21 of
General Plan EIR):
“Scenic corridors are considered a defined area of landscape, viewed as a single entity
that includes the total field of vision visible from a specific point, or series of points along
a linear transportation route. Public view corridors are areas in which short-range,
medium-range and long-range views are available from publicly accessible viewpoints,
such as from city streets. However, scenic vistas are generally interpreted as long-range
views of a specific scenic feature (e.g. open space lands, mountain ridges, bay, or ocean
views)”.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 48
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The eastern part of Cupertino is relatively flat, whereas the western part of the city is
characterized by changes in topography as it slopes into the Santa Cruz Mountains. Because
Cupertino is largely built out, views of scenic vistas within the City are limited. However, given
the flat nature of the majority of the City, views of the Santa Cruz Mountain Range can be
captured from portions of major roadway corridors such as Stevens Creek Boulevard and
Homestead Road. Views of the Santa Cruz Mountains are likely to increase as a person travels
towards the foothills in the western and southern areas of the City.
The City has not designated any major roadways or any other streets/areas in the City as scenic
corridors or as being part of a scenic vista. While the General Plan does not specifically address
scenic corridors or vistas, it recognizes the views of the foothills (i.e. Montebello) and ridgelines
of the Santa Cruz Mountains to the west and other natural features that surround the City as
important resources (Cupertino 2014).
City Parks as Scenic Resources
The City of Cupertino owns or manages approximately 224 acres of parks, trails, creek
corridors, sports fields, and recreation facilities at 32 sites. Most of the City’s parks are
landscaped with common native and non-native plant species and contain a variety of
recreation facilities including, but not limited to: play areas, picnic areas, open lawns, sports
courts, sports fields, bathrooms, and trails, which influence the aesthetic quality of each park.
Several parks, including Creekside Park, Stevens Creek Corridor Park, and Sterling Barnhart
Park, feature a creek or other linear water feature, along with their corresponding riparian
vegetation. All City park land has been categorized into community park, neighborhood park,
special use site, and trail corridor categories, and is shown on the map in Figure 2-2, Existing
Parks Open Space and Recreation Resources.
Section 2.2.1 in Project Description describes the City’s existing community parks, large
neighborhood parks, small neighborhood parks, and special use sites.
Community Parks
The City has two community parks: Memorial Park (22 acres) and Stevens Creek Corridor Park
(63.7 acres). Memorial Park features an urban setting with commercial uses along Stevens
Creek Boulevard to the south and single and multi-family residences on other adjacent parcels.
The park’s scenic resources include open lawns, mature trees, ponds, a gazebo, and public art.
Stevens Creek Corridor Park is composed of several contiguous sites, and for purposes of the
Master Plan is categorized as a single Community Park. It has many scenic and historic
components; the park includes Stevens Creek Trail, McClellan Ranch Preserve, McClellan
Ranch West, Blackberry Farm Park, Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Stocklmeir Ranch, and
additional adjacent parcels owned by the City or Santa Clara Valley Water District. The park
features a largely riparian setting situated around Stevens Creek, as well as the aforementioned
developed sites and trail.
Representative photos of Memorial Park and Stevens Creek Corridor Park are presented below.
Both parks provide pleasing views of open areas, landscaping and an open view of the skyline,
and Stevens Creek Corridor Park provides high quality views of Stevens Creek, the riparian
corridor, open meadows, and large native trees. The visual quality of both parks is high, and the
natural landscape of Stevens Creek Corridor Park is unique and highly valued by park users.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 49
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Memorial Park
Memorial Park picnic area in foreground and play area with tennis courts in background,
camera facing northwest.
Gift from Cupertino’s sister city Toyokawa, Japan in foreground and ponds (currently empty)
in background within Memorial Park. Adjacent multi-family residences and view of mountains
in the background on right. Picture looking south from picnic area.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 50
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Memorial Park gazebo and pond (currently empty) in the foreground with amphitheater in the
background. Picture looking east.
Memorial Park lawn in foreground with Quinlan Community Center and single-family
residences in background. Picture looking east.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 51
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Stevens Creek Corridor Park
McClellan Ranch Preserve entrance and view of Parrish Tank House with Stevens Creek
Trail on right. Picture looking southwest.
McClellan Ranch Preserve, Rolling Hills 4-H grounds in foreground and community garden in
background. Picture looking northwest from Stevens Creek Trail.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 52
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Blackberry Farm Park orchard and pool house buildings with Stevens Creek Trail on right.
Picture looking south.
Group picnic area at Blackberry Farm Park. Picture looking west.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 53
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are intended to serve the neighborhoods in which they are located;
therefore, they are largely situated in residential settings. The City has eight large
(approximately 4 to 13 acres) and six small community parks (approximately 0.3 to 3 acres).
These parks include Creekside Park, Hoover Park, Jollyman Park, Linda Vista Park, Monta
Vista Park and Recreation Center, Portal Park, Varian Park, Wilson Park, Canyon Oak Park,
Franco Park, Little Rancho Park, Somerset Park, Sterling Barnhart Park, and Three Oaks Park.
The visual quality of neighborhood parks varies with the size of the park, the amount of active
recreation facilities, and landscaping. All parks are attractive and provide park users with
pleasing visual settings. Parks with native landscaping and those near creek channels provide
more natural visual settings.
Sterling Barnhart Park
Sterling Barnhart Park featuring sign and play area with access to Saratoga Creek Trail on
right. Adjacent single-family residence pictured on left. Saratoga Creek borders east edge of
park. Picture looking northeast.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 54
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Pedestrian-bicycle bridge over Saratoga Creek. Picture looking west towards Sterling
Barnhart Park.
Saratoga Creek. Picture looking south from pedestrian-bicycle bridge.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 55
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Jollyman Park
Jollyman Park baseball field and trail. Picture looking northeast.
Surrounding single family neighborhood near Jollyman Park. Picture looking west down
Heatherwood Drive.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 56
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Creekside Park
Softball backstop in Creekside Park. Picture looking south from park building.
Trail and benches near western play area in Creekside Park. Picture looking west.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 57
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Pedestrian-bicycle bridge entrance to Creekside Trail. Picture from western edge of northern
sport field in Creekside Park.
Calabazas Creek. Picture looking northeast from pedestrian-bicycle bridge to Creekside Park.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 58
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Linda Vista Park
Linda Vista Park southern play area situated at the highest of three primary levels along the
hillside. Picture looking south.
Linda Vista Park group picnic area situated in middle of the three primary levels along the
hillside. Picture looking north from upper level.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 59
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Linda Vista Park playground and picnic area situated on lowest of three primary levels along
the hillside with restroom building in the background. Picture looking southeast.
Pathway within Linda Vista Park on left. Deep Cliff Golf Course on right. Picture looking
northwest from Linda Vista Park.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 60
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Little Rancho Park
Little Rancho Park play area and benches with surrounding single-family houses in
background. Picture looking southwest.
Canyon Oak Park
Canyon Oak Park play area and benches. Picture looking northeast toward Canyon Oak Way
from rear of the park.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 61
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
View of part of Rancho San Antonio County Park across Canyon Oak Way from Canyon Oak
Park. Picture looking northeast.
Library Field
Library Field with rows of trees and Pacifica Drive in the background. Picture looking
southeast from Cupertino Library.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 62
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Civic Center Plaza
Civic Center Plaza featuring sign in foreground, Community Hall in center background, and
Cupertino Library on right. Picture looking east.
Civic Center Plaza vicinity featuring statue in foreground and benches, landscaping, and City
Hall in background. Picture looking north.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 63
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Special Use Sites
Special use sites are parks that do not fit into the other park categories. The City has the
following special use sites: the Civic Center (Civic Center Plaza, Community Hall, and Library
Field), Mary Avenue Dog Park, and the Cupertino Sports Center. These sites all feature an
urban setting with landscaping and are generally surrounded by residential and/or commercial
uses. While each special use site is attractive in an urban setting, their management is not
focused on visual or scenic qualities.
Trail Corridors
Identified trail corridors within the City include the Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge and
Trail, Creekside Park and Regnart Creek Trail (from Creekside Park to East Estates Drive),
Saratoga Creek Trail, Stevens Creek Trail, the proposed Linda Vista Park to McClellan Ranch
Preserve Trail, and other potential trails (Junipero Serra Trail, Historic De Anza Trail e.g.). Most
trails within the City lie within a riparian corridor or parks within an urban setting. Stevens Creek
Trail passes through several scenic areas, including Stocklmeir Ranch.
Pedestrian-bicycle bridge over Calabazas Creek that links to Creekside Park. Picture looking
west.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 64
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Stevens Creek Trail through Stocklmeir Ranch. Picture looking north.
Pedestrian-bicycle bridge over Stevens Creek near Stocklmeir Ranch. Picture looking north.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 65
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Stevens Creek Trail through McClellan Ranch Preserve. Picture looking east from parking lot.
3.1.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal and State Regulations
There are no federal or state regulations related to aesthetic or scenic quality that are relevant
to the proposed Master Plan.
Local Regulations
City of Cupertino General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040 (‘General Plan’)
The General Plan, along with several specific plans, guides development within the City. The
General Plan does not contain policies specific to visual or aesthetic quality that are directly
relevant to the Master Plan, other than policies that guide the visual quality of new structures
and streetscapes, and which protect residential neighborhoods from intrusive effects of more
intense development. These policies are listed below.
•Policy LU-2.2. Require developments to incorporate pedestrian-scaled elements along
the street and within the development such as parks, plazas, active uses along the
street, active uses, entries, outdoor dining, and public art.
•Policy LU-12.4. The Montebello foothills at the south and west boundary of the valley
floor provide a scenic backdrop, adding to the City’s scale and variety. While it is not
possible to guarantee an unobstructed view of the hills from every vantage point, an
attempt should be made to preserve views of the foothills.
•Policy LU-27.7. Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and visually
intrusive effects from more intense development with landscape buffers, site design,
setbacks, and other appropriate measures.
Specific plans including Heart of the City Specific Plan, South Vallco Specific Plan, and the
Monte Vista Design Guidelines address the aesthetic quality of development within each of
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 66
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
those areas, including building design details, pedestrian friendly design features, landscaping
treatment, signage, lighting, and public improvement details.
City of Cupertino Municipal Code
Besides the General Plan, the City of Cupertino Municipal Code (‘Municipal Code’) is the
primary tool that shapes the form and character of physical development in Cupertino. The
Municipal Code contains all ordinances for the city, and identifies land use categories, site
development regulations, and other general provisions that ensure consistency of proposed
development projects with the General Plan. The Municipal Code is organized by Title, Chapter,
and Section. The following provisions from the Municipal Code help minimize visual impacts
associated with new development projects:
•Title 13 Section 04.201 Nature and/or Rural Preserve designates and includes
provisions for nature and/or rural preserves. Uses for these areas shall be limited to
those which will maintain and protect the ecology of the area, conserve the natural
features and scenic values, expand community awareness and understanding of natural
history and the environment, and provide enjoyment of the resources present consistent
with their preservation. McClellan Ranch Park is designated a nature and rural preserve.
(Ord. 710, (part), 1975)
•Title 19 is the City’s Zoning Code, which establishes comprehensive zoning regulations
for the City. The purposes of the Zoning Ordinance include assuring the orderly and
beneficial development of the City, attaining a desirable balance of residential and
employment opportunities, and promoting efficient urban design and arrangement.
Municipal Code § 19.040.020. The Zoning Ordinance sets forth the standards requiring
architectural and site review and stipulating aesthetic criteria for new development. For
instance, a proposed development should ensure compatibility to adjacent uses in terms
of architectural style and building size. The Zoning Ordinance also contains development
standards related to aesthetics, including fencing (Chapter 19.48) and signage
(Municipal Code Chapter 19.104).
o Pursuant to Chapter 19.168, Architectural and Site Review, the Approval Body,
defined as either the Director of Community Development and his/her designee,
the Planning Commission or City Council depending upon context, is responsible
for the review of architectural and site designs of buildings within the city to
promote and ensure compliance with the goals and objectives identified in the
General Plan. The findings for architectural and site review are as follows:
The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this [Architectural and
Site Review] chapter, the General Plan, any specific plan, zoning
ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use
permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which
regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to
the following specific criteria:
o Abrupt changes in building scale should be avoided. A gradual transition related
to height and bulk should be achieved between new and existing buildings.
o With respect to new projects within existing residential neighborhoods, new
development should be designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and
visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, walls, and
other appropriate design measures.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 67
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.1.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. As described in the Environmental Setting and reflected in the policies presented in
the Regulatory Setting discussion, there are no designated scenic vistas within the City limits.
However, the General Plan recognizes the foothills (i.e. Montebello) as important resources and
provides policies to ensure their protection as scenic elements visible from within the City, but it
does not define them as scenic vistas. Views of the Santa Cruz mountains and the Montebello
area foothills would be visible from within selected parks depending on the location of the park,
intervening topography, and development.
Certain types of projects carried out under the Master Plan could potentially block views of the
foothills from within a particular park such as the construction of a new building, or extensive
tree planting. However, because the City lacks designated scenic vistas, adoption and
implementation of the Master Plan would not affect a scenic vista and the project would have no
impact.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees,
rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. No state designated scenic highways are located within the City of Cupertino.
Therefore, adoption of the Master Plan would not affect a state designated Scenic Highway. In
addition, as stated above, the City does not have any locally designated scenic corridors.
c)In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the
project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable
zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Cupertino is an urbanized area. The Master Plan
projects would be designed, constructed, and maintained consistent with all adopted City
policies and regulations, including those focused on visual quality of the urban environment. The
Master Plan presents several objectives that would enhance the visual quality of certain parks
through managing meadows, natural areas and wildlife habitat (Objective 1B), recognizing local
ecological habitats and native landscape (Objective 1D), re-landscaping with native species,
and introducing butterfly and pollinator gardens (Objective 1E). The Master Plan is intended to
enhance the visual character of Cupertino parks. Once design and implementation information
becomes available for specific development or improvement projects recommended by the
Master Plan, the City would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are covered by this
programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent environmental review is required. Therefore,
adoption of the Master Plan will not cause a significant impact to the visual character of the
project area and its surroundings.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Most existing City parks have night security
lighting. Some parks with sports fields and tennis courts, such as Memorial Park or Cupertino
Sports Center, have existing field or court lighting for night games and recreation. The Master
Plan identifies an opportunity to improve walkway lighting at Portal Park, as well as to evaluate
whether lighting any sports fields is appropriate to extend evening hour usage (Table 2-2,
Objective 4.E, Action vi). The Master Plan does not recommend night lighting at any specific
sports field. Potential new park and recreation facilities presented in Table 2-4 would also likely
result in new security night lighting.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 68
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Nighttime safety and security lighting in parks are usually placed in parking lots, along
pathways, and around buildings, and is not high intensity lighting or mounted at an elevation
where direct glare impacts to adjacent sensitive land uses (residential areas) would be
anticipated. Currently the City does not have any adopted policies specifically directed at
preventing light and glare impacts to adjacent land uses. Although impacts are not anticipated,
without such policies in place to guide future park projects, there is potential that night lighting
associated with park and recreation activities could cause light and glare impacts to adjacent
sensitive land uses. Mitigation Measure AES-1 presented below would be applied to future park
projects with a night lighting component to ensure light and glare impacts are prevented.
Implementation of AES-1 would reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant
levels.
Any future park development would be required to design, construct, and maintain new night
lighting in accordance with all adopted City plans and policies, including the General Plan and
the Municipal Code, and policies related to energy usage and control of light and glare. Master
Plan Objective 1D.vii, states that the new dark sky policy that the City plans to develop, would
be incorporated into park projects to minimize light intrusion into environmentally sensitive areas
such as creek and riparian corridors.
Objective 4.E, Action vi of the Master Plan recommends evaluating whether lighting any sports
fields is appropriate to extend evening hour usage (see Table 2-2). Sport field lighting requires
high intensity lighting that is elevated above the field and can cause light and glare impacts to
adjacent land uses. The Master Plan does not recommend night lighting at any specific sports
field. It is not possible to assess the potential light and glare impacts of Objective 4.E, Action vi
in advance of a proposed project at an identified location. Once a project location is identified
and project design and implementation information are available, the City would evaluate the
project to determine what level of subsequent environmental review is required. Projects
implemented under the Master Plan would be subject to Mitigation Measure AES-1 and would
be designed according to all General Plan and Municipal Code requirements, discussed above
in the Regulatory Setting, which are intended to address conflicts between land uses.
Mitigation Measures:
Impact AES -1: Park projects that include night lighting could cause light and glare impacts to
sensitive adjacent land uses.
Mitigation Measure AES -1: New exterior lighting in proximity to adjacent property will be
shielded as necessary to ensure that exterior light sources do not create a significant light or
glare impact on an adjacent land use. A lighting plan that addresses potential light and glare
impacts shall be prepared for projects that include new night lighting in proximity to adjacent
private properties.
Effectiveness: This measure would minimize and/or avoid light and glare impacts to
sensitive adjacent properties.
Implementation: The City shall implement this measure during the design of park
projects that include night lighting.
Timing: During project design.
Monitoring: City shall implement this measure per the MMRP requirements and
shall require a lighting plan that addresses potential light and glare
impacts be prepared for projects including night lighting.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 69
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.2 AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project*:
a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use or a Williamson Act contract?
c)Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d)Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e)Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland
to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forestland to non-forest use?
*In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the
Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon
measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.
3.2.1 Environmental Setting
The California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
(FMMP) rates farmland according to soil quality and irrigation status. The FMMP classifies
Prime Farmland, as well as other farmland of importance. Classifications found within the City of
Cupertino are defined as follows:
•Urban and Built-Up Land. Urban and Built-Up land is occupied by structures with a
building density of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately 6 structures to a 10-acre
parcel. Common examples include residential, industrial, commercial, institutional
facilities, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, and
water control structures.
•Other Land. Land not included in any other mapping category. Common examples
include low density rural developments; brush, timber, wetland, and riparian areas not
suitable for livestock grazing; confined livestock, poultry or aquaculture facilities; strip
mines, borrow pits; and water bodies smaller than forty acres. Vacant and
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 70
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
nonagricultural land surrounded on all sides by urban development and greater than 40
acres is mapped as Other Land.
A majority of land in Cupertino has been classified under the FMMP as Urban and Built-up
Land. Some land near Linda Vista Park and Regnart Creek, along the base of the foothills and
outside of the urban area, is classified as Other Land. Maps prepared pursuant to the FMMP
show there are no lands classified as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland) within the City of Cupertino.
The California Land Conservation (Williamson) Act 2010 Status Report identifies land in Santa
Clara County that is currently under Williamson Act contract and shows that there is no land
under Williamson Act within the City (Cupertino 2014).
The Cupertino Land Use Map has no agriculture land use designation (City of Cupertino 2018).
Public Resources Code section 12220(g) defines “forest land” as land that can support 10
percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and
that allow for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish
and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. Public Resources
Code section 4526 defines “timber land” as land which is available for, and capable of, growing
a crop of trees of a commercial species for lumber or other forest products, including Christmas
trees. The City of Cupertino does not contain any private or public forestland or timberland
(CDFW 2015).
3.2.2 Regulatory Setting
Because the City does not contain agriculture or forest land, there are no adopted policies or
regulations relevant to the proposed Master Plan.
3.2.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping
and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
c)Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forestland (as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d)Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e)Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forestland to non-forest use?
No Impact. (Responses a – e). The City’s existing parks are not located within prime or other
agricultural lands as mapped by the State FMMP. Rather, existing parks are located within
areas designated as “Urban and Built-up Land.” Adoption of the Master Plan would not result in
projects that would convert any farmland or forest land to a non-agricultural/non-forest use
because no farmland or forest lands lie within the City boundaries. Therefore, the Master Plan
would not result in impacts to any agricultural or forest resources.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 71
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.3 AIR QUALITY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project*:
a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
b)Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
c)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d)Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
*Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
3.3.1 Environmental Setting
The City of Cupertino is located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which
is composed of Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, San Francisco, San Mateo, Marin, and
Napa County, as well as the southern portions of Solano and Sonoma counties. The SFBAAB is
characterized by a Mediterranean climate with warm, dry summers and cool, damp winters.
During the summer daytime, high temperatures near the coast are primarily in the mid-60s,
whereas areas farther inland are typically in the high-80s to low-90s. Nighttime low
temperatures on average are in the mid-40s along the coast and low- 60’s to mid-50s inland.
Federal, state, and local governments control air quality through the implementation of laws,
ordinances, regulations, and standards. The federal and state governments have established
ambient air quality standards for “criteria” pollutants considered harmful to the environment and
public health. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) have been established for
carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), fine particulate matter
(particles 2.5 microns in diameter and smaller, or PM2.5), inhalable coarse particulate matter
(particles 10 microns in diameter or smaller, or PM10), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). California
Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) are more stringent than the national standards for the
pollutants listed above and also include the following additional pollutants: hydrogen sulfide
(H2S), sulfates (SOX), and vinyl chloride. In addition to these criteria pollutants, the federal and
state governments have classified certain pollutants as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) or toxic
air contaminants (TACs), such as asbestos and diesel particulate matter (DPM).
The SFBAAB is currently designated as non-attainment for the 1-hour and 8-hour state ozone
standards, the 8-hour national ozone standard, the state annual average PM2.5 standard, the
national 24-hour PM2.5 standard, and the state annual average and 24-hour PM10 standards
(BAAQMD 2017a). Locally, the City of Cupertino is not in an area that generally experiences
elevated levels of the nonattainment pollutants, specifically ozone and PM2.5 (BAAQMD 2018).
This is because the City’s geographic location allows the large-scale wind pattern in the Bay
Area to disperse criteria pollutants generated within and in proximity to Cupertino either
southward to San Jose or eastward to the East Bay (BAAQMD 2018). They do not remain
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 72
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
stagnant in the city, which would lead to higher concentrations of criteria air pollutants. The Bay
Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) Healthy Places initiative provides support for
addressing healthy infill development and identifies areas throughout the Bay Area that are
estimated to have elevated levels of fine particulates and/or toxic air contaminants. In the City of
Cupertino, areas with elevated levels of pollution are most likely to be along and in the vicinity of
major roadways and large commercial or industrial facilities (BAAQMD 2019a).
3.3.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency - Federal Clean Air Act
The federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the
national air pollution control effort. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
responsible for implementing most aspects of the Clean Air Act, including the setting of NAAQS
for criteria pollutants under the Clean Air Act. States with areas that exceed the NAAQS must
prepare a state implementation plan that demonstrates how those areas will attain the
standards within mandated time frames.
State
California Air Resources Board
The federal Clean Air Act delegates the regulation of air pollution control and the enforcement of
the NAAQS to the states. In California, the task of air quality management and regulation has
been legislatively granted to the California Air Resources Board (CARB), with subsidiary
responsibilities assigned to air quality management districts and air pollution control districts at
the regional and county levels. CARB has established the CAAQS, which are more restrictive
than the NAAQS.
In addition, CARB establishes the process for the identification and control of TACs and
includes provisions to make the public aware of significant toxic exposures and for reducing risk.
A substance is considered toxic if it has the potential to cause adverse health effects in humans,
including increasing the risk of cancer upon exposure, or acute and/or chronic non-cancer
health effects. Examples include certain aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons, certain metals,
and asbestos. TACs are generated by a number of sources, including stationary sources such
as dry cleaners, gas stations, combustion sources, and laboratories; mobile sources such as
automobiles, on- and off-road diesel equipment (e.g., trucks, excavators, bulldozers); and area
sources such as landfills.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
The BAAQMD is responsible for maintaining air quality and regulating emissions of air pollutants
within the SFBAAB. The BAAQMD carries out this responsibility by preparing, adopting, and
implementing plans, regulations, and rules that are designed to achieve attainment of state and
national air quality standards. The BAAQMD currently has 13 regulations containing more than
100 rules that control and limit emissions from sources of pollutants. Most of these rules do not
directly apply to the proposed Master Plan. The BAAQMD rules that would be most likely to
apply to the future park enhancement, improvement, and development activities identified in the
Master Plan are summarized in Table 3-1 below.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 73
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 3-1: Potentially Applicable BAAQMD Rules and Regulations
Regulation and Rule Description
Regulation 6 (Particulate Matter)
1 – General Requirements Limits the quantity of particulate matter in the
atmosphere by controlling emission rates,
concentration, visible emissions and opacity
6 – Prohibition of Trackout Addresses fugitive road dust emissions associated
with trackout of dirt/mud onto pavement
Regulation 8 (Organic Compounds)
Rule 3 – Architectural Coatings Limits the quantity of volatile organic
compounds in architectural coatings supplied, sold,
offered for sale, applied, solicitedfor application, or
manufactured for use within the BAAQMD
Rule 40 – Aeration of Contaminated Soil
and Removal of Underground Storage
Tanks
Limits emissions of organic compounds from soil that
has been contaminated by organic chemical or
petroleum chemical leaks or spills
Rule 47 – Air Stripping and Soil Vapor
Extraction Operations
Limits emissions of organic compounds from
contaminated groundwater and soil; applies to new
and modified air stripping and soil vapor extraction
equipment used for the treatment of groundwater or
soil contaminated with organic compounds
Regulation 11 (Hazardous Pollutants)
Rule 2 – Asbestos Demolition, Renovation,
and Manufacturing
Controls emissions of asbestos to the atmosphere
during demolition of structures with asbestos-
containing materials
Source: BAAQMD, 2019b
In April 2017, the BAAQMD adopted its Spare the Air-Cool the Climate 2017 Clean Air Plan
(2017 Clean Air Plan). The 2017 Clean Air Plan updates the most recent Bay Area ozone plan,
the 2010 Clean Air Plan, in fulfillment of state ozone planning requirements. This plan presents
the District’s Ozone Strategy and addresses PM, TACs, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
in a single, integrated document that contains control strategies describing specific measures
and actions the BAAQMD and its partners will implement to improve air quality, protect public
health, and protect the climate. The Plan includes 85 distinct control measures to help the
region reduce air pollutants and has a long-term strategic vision which forecasts what a clean
air Bay Area will look like in the year 2050. The control measures aggressively target
transportation which is considered the largest source of GHG, ozone pollutants, and particulate
matter emissions. The 2017 Clean Air Plan includes more incentives for electric vehicle
infrastructure, off-road electrification projects such as Caltrain and shore power at ports, and
reducing emissions from trucks, school buses, marine vessels, locomotives, and off-road
equipment (BAAQMD, 2017b).
In May 2017, the BAAQMD published an updated version of its CEQA Air Quality Guidelines
(BAAQMD, 2017c). This IS/MND contains the BAAQMD’s recommendations to Lead Agencies
for evaluating the significance of a project’s potential air quality impacts and provides guidance
on assessing and mitigating both project- and plan-level air quality impacts. The BAAQMD’s
CEQA Air Quality Guidelines state (BAAQMD, 2017c, pg. 9-1):
“The term general and area plan refers broadly to discretionary planning activities which
may include, but are not limited to the following: general plans, redevelopment plans,
specific plans, area plans, community plans, congestion management plans, and
annexations of lands and service areas. General and area plans are often subject to
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 74
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
program-level analysis under CEQA, as opposed to project-level analysis. As a general
principle, the guidance offered within this chapter should be applied to discretionary,
program-level planning activities; whereas the project-level guidance offered in other
chapters should be applied to individual project-specific approvals, such as a proposed
development project. Air quality impacts from future development pursuant to general or
area plans can be divided into construction-related impacts and operational-related
impacts. Construction-related impacts are associated with construction activities likely to
occur in conjunction with future development allocated by the plan. Operational-related
impacts are associated with continued and future operation of developed land uses,
including increased vehicle trips and energy use.”
The proposed Master Plan provides the blueprint and basis for decision-making for the
enhancement of existing City parks and the addition of new park and recreation facilities. As
such, it is a discretionary plan-level document that does not authorize or approve any specific
park enhancement or improvement, or other park-related project. Accordingly, this IS/MND
evaluates the Master Plan using the plan-level guidance contained in the Chapter 9 of the
BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (BAAQMD 2017c). Where possible, a discussion of
potential future construction and operational emissions impacts has been provided for
information purposes only.
General Plan
The Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element of the City’s General Plan includes
goals, policies, and strategies to help the City improve sustainability and the ecological health
and the quality of life for the community. The following goals, policies, and strategies from the
General Plan apply to the Master Plan:
•Goal ES-2. Promote conservation of energy resources.
•Policy ES-2.1 Conservation and Efficient Use of Energy Resources. Encourage the
maximum feasible conservation and efficient use of electrical power and natural gas
resources for new and existing residences, businesses, industrial and public uses.
•Strategy ES-2.1.5 Urban Forest. Encourage the inclusion of additional shade trees,
vegetated stormwater treatment and landscaping to reduce the “heat island effect” in
development projects.
•Goal ES-4 Maintain healthy air quality levels.
•Policy ES-4.1 New Development. Minimize the air quality impacts of new development
projects and air quality impacts that affect new development.
•Strategy ES-4.1.1 Toxic Air Contaminants. Continue to review projects for potential
generation of TACs at the time of approval and confer with the BAAQMD on controls
needed if impacts are uncertain.
•Strategy ES-4.1.2 Dust Control. Continue to require water application to non-polluting
dust control measures during demolition and the duration of the construction period.
•Policy ES-4.2 Existing Development. Minimize the air quality impacts of existing
development.
•Strategy ES-4.2.4 Fuel efficient Vehicles and Use. Prioritize the purchase, replacement,
and ongoing use of fuel-efficient and low polluting City fleet vehicles.
3.3.3 Discussion
The adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific park enhancement,
improvement, or other development action identified in the Master Plan. Because project-
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 75
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
specific information is not available at this time, potential air quality impacts can only be
evaluated at a program-level, based on the likely construction and operational activities
associated with the Master Plan projects. Once design and implementation information become
available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are
covered by this programmatic IS/MND, or whether subsequent CEQA analysis is necessary.
In general, the potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development actions
identified in the Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS/MND (see Section 2.7) are small
in size (i.e., potential projects do not have a large footprint) and scale (i.e., potential projects do
not involve substantial expansion of existing park and recreational facilities or the development
of significant new facilities) and are compatible with the existing active and/or passive
recreational nature of the specific park type where the improvement would occur (e.g.,
community park, large neighborhood park, small neighborhood park). The potential air quality
impacts of the projects listed in Section 2.7 are considered and evaluated below.
As described in Section 2.7 and noted above, the Master Plan identifies some modifications to
existing park and recreation facilities (see Table 2-3) as well as several potential new park and
recreation facilities (e.g., an Aquatics Facility; see Table 2-4) that may result in a new park
facility, or an appreciable change in the nature and character of the recreation activities offered
at an existing park facility. Once project-level information is developed for improvements
proposed to be implement under the opportunities identified in the Master Plan, the City would
review the project under CEQA and determine the appropriate level of environmental review. In
the absence of even conceptual-level design and implementation information, this IS/MND
cannot evaluate the potential environmental impacts of some of the actions contemplated in the
Master Plan. Future review of these projects would focus on site-specific environmental issues
that could not be examined in sufficient detail as part of this IS/MND.
Would the project:
a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. As described below, the Master Plan would not conflict with an applicable air quality
plan, including the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan.
BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan
Consistent with BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, the proposed Master Plan would
result in a significant impact if it would be inconsistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan control
measures or result in a projected increase in vehicle trips or vehicle miles travelled (VMT) that
exceeds a projected population increase. As discussed in more detail below, the proposed
Master Plan is consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan and many of the enhancement
opportunities (see Section 2.7) would not result in an increase in vehicle trips or VMT. None of
the Master Plan enhancement opportunities would result in a change in population in the City.
The proposed Master Plan, therefore, would be consistent with the BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air
Plan.
Consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan Control Measures
With regard to consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan control measures, the BAAQMD CEQA
Guidelines recommend a lead agency analyze consistency using the following three questions:
1)Does the project support the primary goals of the Air Quality Plan?
2)Does the project include applicable control measures from the Air Quality Plan?
3)Does the project disrupt or hinder implementation of any Air Quality Plan control
measures?
These questions are answered below.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 76
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
•Support for the Primary Goals of the 2017 Clean Air Plan: The BAAQMD’s 2017
Clean Air Plan is a multi-pollutant plan focused on protecting public health and the
climate. Specifically, the primary goals of the 2017 Clean Air Plan are to:
o Attain all state and national quality standards;
o Eliminate disparities among Bay Area communities in cancer health risk from toxic
air contaminants; and
o Reduce Bay Area GHG Emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and 80
percent below 1990 levels by 2050 2.
The proposed Master Plan is a plan-level document that would not authorize or approve
any specific park improvement project that requires quantification and assessment of
potential construction or operational emissions. Furthermore, as described below under
discussion b), the size and scale of the potential park improvements that are within the
scope of this IS/MND are substantially below the development intensity level (in acres)
at which the BAAQMD has determined a potential air quality impact may occur from a
park project (BAAQMD 2017b, Table 3-1). Adoption of the Master Plan, therefore, would
not generate emissions that could interfere with attainment of ambient air quality
standards.
The proposed Master Plan would not generate significant emissions of TACs, nor
contribute to disparities in cancer risk among Bay Area communities. Cupertino is not in
an area that generally experiences elevated levels of the nonattainment pollutants,
specifically ozone and PM2.5 (BAAQMD 2018). This is because the City’s geographic
location allows the large-scale wind pattern in the Bay Area to disperse criteria pollutants
generated within and in proximity to Cupertino either southward to San Jose or eastward
to the East Bay. They do not remain stagnant in the city, which would lead to higher
concentrations of criteria air pollutants. Additionally, according to BAAQMD data, the
City is not an impacted community under the BAAQMD’s Community Air Risk Evaluation
(CARE) Program, which identifies areas and populations that are most vulnerable to air
pollution and associated adverse health risks. The adoption of the Master Plan would not
generate significant TAC emissions in areas vulnerable to air pollution and, therefore,
would not contribute to disparities in health risks associated with TAC emissions.
Finally, as described Section 3.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the Master Plan would
support Bay Area GHG emissions reductions by expanding non-motorized access to
City parks and through consistency and compliance with policies contained in the City’s
General Plan and Climate Action Plan (Cupertino 2015a).
For the reasons described above, the adoption of Master Plan would support the primary
goals of the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan.
•Inclusion of Applicable 2017 Clean Air Plan Control Measures: Chapter 5 of the
2017 Clean Air Plan contains the BAAQMD’s strategy for achieving the plan’s climate
and air quality goals. This control strategy is the backbone of the 2017 Clean Air Plan. It
identifies 85 distinct control measures designed to:
o Reduce ozone precursors, in order to fulfill California Health & Safety Code ozone
planning requirements;
o Protect public health by reducing emissions of ozone precursors, PM, and TACs; and
2 Impacts related to GHG emissions and consistency with the 2017 Clean Air Plan are discussed in Section 3.8,
Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 77
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
o Serve as a regional climate protection strategy by reducing emissions of GHG across
the full range of economic sectors
The 85 control measures identified in the 2017 Clean Air plan are grouped by nine
economic-based “sectors” as shown in Table 3-23.
Table 3-2: BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan Control Measure Sectors
Sector No. of
Measures General Description of Sector Applicability
Agriculture (AG) 4 Applies to sources of air pollution from agricultural
operations include on and off-road trucks and
farming equipment, aircraft for crop spraying, animal
waste, pesticide and fertilizer use, crop residue
burning, travel on unpaved roads, and soil tillage.
Buildings
(BL) 4 Applies to residential, commercial, governmental and
institutional buildings, which generate emissions
through energy use for heating, cooling, and
operating the building, and from the materials used in
building construction and maintenance
Energy
(EN) 2 Applies to emissions of criteria pollutants, TACs, and
GHGs from electricity generated and used within the
Bay area, as well as GHG emissions from electricity
generated outside the Bay area that is imported and
used within the region
Natural and Working
Lands (NW) 3 Applies to emissions from natural and working lands,
including forests, woodlands, shrub lands,
grasslands, rangelands, and wetlands.
Stationary Sources
(SS)
40 Applies to stationary sources used in commercial and
industrial facilities. Such sources are regulated
through BAAQMD rulemaking, permitting, and
enforcement programs
Super GHGs (SL) 3 Applies to emissions of methane, black carbon, and
fluorinated gases
Transportation (TR) 23 Applies to on-road motor vehicles such as light-duty
automobiles or heavy-duty trucks, as well as off-road
vehicles, including airplanes, locomotives, ships and
boats, and off-road equipment such as airport
ground-support equipment, construction equipment
and farm equipment.
Waste
(WA) 4 Applies to emissions from landfills and composting
activities.
3The BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan use the same economic sectors contained in CARB’s Scoping Plan.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 78
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 3-2: BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan Control Measure Sectors
Sector No. of
Measures General Description of Sector Applicability
Water
(WR) 2 Applies to direct emissions from the treatment of
water and wastewater at publicly owned treatment
works and indirect emissions associated with the
energy used to pump, convey, recycle, and treat
water and wastewater throughout the Bay
Of the nine economic sectors, six contain control measures that are relevant to potential
Master Plan projects. As described below, the City’s General Plan and proposed Master
Plan incorporate policies and implementing actions that are consistent with the 2017
Clean Air Plan control measures and implementation mechanisms.
o Buildings control measure 4 (BL4; Urban Heat Island Mitigation) reduces formation of
ground-level ozone, PM, and GHG by mitigating urban heat island effects through the
use of building materials that reflect instead of absorbing solar radiation (e.g., cool
pavements and roofs) and the planting of trees to block incoming solar radiation. This
2017 Clean Air Plan control measure would be implemented through BAAQMD
information dissemination actions, such as the development of model ordinances and
heat island outreach and awareness campaigns. As described in Section 2.6.1, the
Master Plan identifies the desire of the City to develop more parks in underserved
neighborhoods and calls for enhancements to natural vegetation (see Section 2.6.1,
Objectives 1A through 1F). Increasing park land, protecting existing vegetation, and
adding vegetation to existing parks would reduce the urban heat island phenomenon,
consistent the 2017 Clean Air Plan measure BL4.
o Energy control measure 2 (EN2; Decrease Electricity Demand) reduces indirect
emissions of air quality pollutants and GHG emissions by decreasing energy use
through consumer awareness and tracking of electricity use. The BAAQMD
implements this measure through information dissemination services, such as
consumer awareness programs, ad campaigns, and coordination with local
governments to adopt energy efficiency programs. As described in Section 3.6,
Energy, and Section 3.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the City’s General Plan
Climate Action Plan includes community-wide and municipal control measures that
call for increased energy efficiency, tracking, and reduction. Master Plan projects
would be developed consistent with City policies for energy efficiency and would thus
be consistent with 2017 Clean Air Plan measure EN2.
o Natural and Working Lands control measure 2 (NW2, Urban Tree Planting) reduces
criteria air pollutants and GHG by promoting the planting of trees in urban settings.
This measure is similar to BL4 described above. Increasing park land, protecting
existing vegetation, and adding vegetation to existing parks would reduce the urban
heat island phenomenon, consistent the 2017 Clean Air Plan measure NW2.
o Stationary source control measure 36 (SS36; PM from Trackout) reduces PM2.5 and
PM10 emissions from track-out of mud and dirt onto paved, public roadways and SS38
(Fugitive Dust) reduces fugitive dust emissions from sources including construction
activities. These 2017 Clean Air Plan measures would be implemented through the
BAAQMD’s rulemaking and permitting authority. In August 2018, the BAAQMD
adopted Regulation VI, Rule 6, Prohibition of Trackout, pursuant to SS36. As
described in Section 2.9, the City would comply with the BAAQMD’s trackout
prevention requirements and has incorporated the BMPs for fugitive dust control
contained in the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines as presented in the Table 2-
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 79
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
5 as a standard measure for Master Plan projects. The Master Plan would be
consistent with 2017 Clean Air Plan measures SS36 and SS38.
o Transportation control measure 9 (TR9; Bicycle Access and Pedestrian Facilities)
generally reduces single-occupancy vehicle trips by expanding bicycle facilities
serving employment sites, educational and cultural facilities, residential areas,
shopping districts, and other activity centers. The Master Plan calls for providing an
interconnected network of multi-use trails, walkways and bikeways, close-to-home
parks and other facilities that encourage biking and walking to City park and recreation
facilities (see Section 2.6.1, Objectives 2A to 2D and 3A to 3C).
o Waste control measure 4 (WA4; Recycling and Waste Reduction) reduces emissions
from landfills by diverting recyclables and other materials from landfills. This measure
would be implemented through the BAAQMD’s dissemination of best practices, such
as model ordinances. The City currently implements construction and demolition
recycling requirements (65% waste diversion for applicable projects) through
Municipal Code Section 16.72, which exceeds the current 2016 CalGreen code
requirements. Master Plan Objective 7.B calls for developing guidelines and best
management practices for sustainable park design and development, including
composting green waste generated in the parks.
o Water control measure 2 (WR2; Support Water Conservation) promotes water
conservation, reduced water consumption, and on-site water recycling, which reduces
indirect GHG emissions associated with electricity used to capture, use, convey, store,
and treat water. The Master Plan identif ies water saving strategies to be implemented
in existing parks and future developments, such as implementation of water efficient,
climate-controlled irrigation systems, the use of graywater where available for
irrigation, installing water-saving fixtures in bathrooms, and replacing high water use
landscaping with drought tolerant and low water-use plantings (Objective 7.B.). In
addition, as described in Section 3.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the City’s Climate
Action Plan includes community-wide and municipal control measures that call for
water conservation, including the use of water efficient landscaping. These measures
have achieved a 29% reduction in total municipal water usage (comparing 2015 to
2008 water use levels). Master Plan projects would be developed consistent with City
policies for water conservation and would thus be consistent with 2017 Clean Air Plan
measure WR2.
• Disruption or Hindrance of Any 2017 Clean Air Plan Control Measures: The
proposed Master Plan provides guidance and priorities for the continued development of
a park and recreation system that meets the needs of the Cupertino community. The
adoption of the Master Plan would not disrupt, delay, or otherwise hinder any BAAQMD
rulemaking processes, and individual activities would comply with all applicable
BAAQMD rules and regulations in effect at the time individual activities move forward.
The adoption of the Master Plan also does not disrupt, delay, or otherwise hinder with
any grant or information-sharing programs operated by the BAAQMD or other regional
agencies through which many of the 2017 Clean Air Plan’s control measures are
implemented.
As described above, the proposed Master Plan would support the primary goals of the 2017
Clean Air Plan, include policies and implementing actions commensurate with the 2017 Clean
Air Plan’s control measures, and would not disrupt, delay, or otherwise hinder the
implementation of any 2017 Clean Air Plan control measure.
Increases in Vehicle Trips/Vehicle Miles Travelled that Exceeds Population Growth
The proposed Master Plan provides guidance and priorities for the continued development of a
park and recreation system that meets the needs of the Cupertino community; it does not
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 80
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
authorize or approve any change any in land use designation or otherwise alter population in
the City of Cupertino. In addition, because the Master Plan focuses on serving the needs of the
local community, it is not likely to result in substantial new vehicle trips or increases in VMT
because the enhancement opportunities are scaled to the type of park in which they are
proposed and most enhancement opportunities do not introduce new uses or activities but
rather recommend improvements to existing uses or enhancements in the infrastructure
(walkways, buildings, landscaping). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the projects
identified in the Master Plan would allow the City’s park and recreation system to better serve
Cupertino residents and thereby reduce or avoid the need for residents to travel outside the City
for certain park and recreation facilities. The Master Plan would support a reduction in
recreation-related vehicle trips and associated VMT through the Master Plan overarching goals
of connectivity (MP2), equitable access (MP3), and creation of high quality, inclusive recreation
experiences that support and reflect Cupertino’s unique character (MP4, MP5, and MP6). The
potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development actions identified in the
Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS (see Section 2.7.1) are compatible with the
existing active and/or passive recreational nature of the specific park type where the
improvement would occur (e.g., community park, large neighborhood park, small neighborhood
park) and would not induce population growth or result in appreciable changes to local traffic
conditions or recreational-related vehicle trips and VMT.
Conclusion Regarding BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan Consistency
As described above, the proposed Master Plan would be consistent with the BAAQMD 2017
Clean Air Plan control measures and would not increase vehicle miles travelled or population
within the City. The proposed Master Plan, therefore, would not conflict with the BAAQMD 2017
Clean Air Plan.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
Less Than Significant Impact. As described in Section 3.3.1, the City of Cupertino is located
in the SFBAAB, an area of non-attainment for national and state ozone standards, national and
state PM2.5 standards, and state PM10 standards. The future development of potential park
enhancements, improvements, and other development actions identified in the Master Plan that
are within the scope of this IS/MND (see Section 2.7) would generate emissions of regulated air
quality pollutants from the following activities, which could contribute to violations of standards
for SFBAAB nonattainment pollutants (ozone, PM2.5, and PM10):
• Short-term construction activities: Park enhancements, improvements, and other
development or construction-related activities would generate emissions from the
following sources:
o Gasoline and diesel fuel combustion in the construction equipment necessary to
complete a project (e.g., material lifts, fork lifts, trenchers, backhoes, etc.), as well as
in motor vehicles travelling to and from the park project site, such as city worker
vehicle trips, vendor vehicle trips (e.g., material deliveries to the project area), and
soil or debris hauling truck trips, would generate emissions of ROG, NOX, CO,
exhaust PM, and other pollutants. The age, type, amount, size, and hours of
construction equipment use, as well as the associated number of workers, vendors,
and haul trucks needed to construct a project, all influence the amount of exhaust
emissions produced by construction equipment and construction-related motor
vehicle trips.
o Demolition and ground disturbance activities associated with equipment or structure
removal, land clearing and grubbing, excavation, grading, and other earth moving
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 81
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
activities necessary to complete a project generate fugitive dust and PM emissions.
These emissions are generated during active demolition and earth moving
operations, as well as when earth/materials are dropped or loaded into haul trucks
and transported to their final destinations. The silt content, soil moisture level, wind
speed, and volume of material moved affect potential fugitive dust emissions from
demolition and earth moving activities.
o Motor vehicle travel on paved and unpaved roads used to access park projects also
generates fugitive dust and PM emissions. The silt content, moisture level, vehicle
weight, and vehicle speed are factors that affect fugitive dust emissions from vehicle
travel on paved and unpaved roads.
• Long-term operational activities: Once constructed, park enhancements,
improvements, and/or other development activities would generate emissions from the
following sources:
o Small “area” sources including landscaping equipment that combust fuel and the use
of consumer products such as paints, cleaners, and fertilizers that result in the
evaporation of ROG into the atmosphere during product use4.
o Energy use in the form of the combustion of natural gas in water and space heating
equipment, which produces emissions of ROG, NOX, CO, and PM.
o Mobile sources, specifically visitor vehicles and City maintenance vehicles travelling
to and from parks, which generate ROG, NOX, CO and PM from fuel combustion as
well as fugitive dust and PM from road travel and tire and break wear.
The proposed Master Plan provides the blueprint and basis for decision-making for the
enhancement of existing City parks and for potential future development of new park and
recreation facilities. As such, it is a discretionary plan-level document that does not authorize or
approve any specific park, park enhancement or improvement, or other park-related project that
requires quantification and assessment of potential construction or operational emissions.
Nonetheless, the BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines contain screening criteria to provide
lead agencies with a conservative indication of whether a proposed project could result in
potentially significant air quality impacts. Consistent with the BAAQMD’s guidance, if a project
meets all the screening criteria, then the project would result in a less than significant air quality
impact (a detailed air quality assessment is not required for the project).One of the land use
types presented for screening analysis in the BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines is a “City
Park” land use. Table 3-3 below presents the BAAQMD’s construction and operational air quality
screening sizes for a City Park land use type, as well as the other screening criteria a project
must meet in order for a lead agency to determine the project would not result in a significant air
quality impact.
4 Area sources are sources that are individually small but numerous in operation throughout an area.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 82
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 3-3: BAAQMD Construction and Operational Screening Criteria for Park Land Use
Screening
Criterion Requirement Project Consistency
1)Land Use
Type and
Size
Project is below all applicable
construction and operational screening
size criteria for “City Park” land uses:
•Construction: 67 acres
•Operations: 2,613 acres
Projects that involve a development
footprint smaller than or equal to the
values listed for a City Park would
satisfy this screening criterion
requirement.
2)Basic
Construction
Measures
Project design and implementation
includes all BAAQMD Basic Construction
Mitigation Measures
Projects that incorporate all BAAQMD
Basic Construction Mitigation Measures
would satisfy this screening criterion
requirement (BAAQMD, 2017, Table 8-
2).
3)Demolition Demolition activities are consistent with
BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 3:
Asbestos Demolition, Renovation, and
Manufacturing
Projects that comply with applicable
BAAQMD regulations, including
Regulation 11, Rule 3 governing
asbestos demolition, renovation, and
manufacturing activities, would satisfy
this requirement.
4) Construction
Phases
Construction does not include
simultaneous occurrence of more than
two construction phases (e.g., grading,
paving, and building construction would
occur simultaneously)
Projects that would involve two or less
active construction phases would
satisfy this requirement.
5)Multiple
Land Uses
Construction does not include
simultaneous construction of more than
one land use type
Projects that would involve construction
of a single land use type would satisfy
this requirement.
6)Site
Preparation
Construction does not require extensive
site preparation
Projects that do not require extensive
site preparation or grading would
satisfy this requirement.
7) Material
Transport
Construction does not require extensive
material transport and considerable haul
truck activity (greater than 10,000 cubic
yards).
Projects that would not involve more
than 10,000 cubic yards of total
material transport would satisfy this
requirement.
8) Carbon
Monoxide
Hotspots
A)Project is consistent with the
applicable congestion management
program, regional transportation plan,
and local congestion management
agency plans; and
B)Project traffic would not increase
traffic volumes at affected
intersections to more than 44,000
vehicles per hour, or more than
24,000 vehicles per hour where
vertical and/or horizontal mixing is
substantially limited (e.g., tunnel,
parking garage, bridge underpass,
Projects that would not result in
significant traffic impacts, conflict with
an applicable congestion management
program or plan, or increase traffic
volumes above BAAQMD CO hotspot
screening levels would satisfy this
requirement.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 83
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 3-3: BAAQMD Construction and Operational Screening Criteria for Park Land Use
Screening
Criterion Requirement Project Consistency
natural or urban street canyon, below-
grade roadway).
Source: BAAQMD, 2017b (Table 3-1, Table 8-2, Page 3-5)
The future development of potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development
actions identified in the Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS/MND (see Section 2.7)
would be unlikely to generate significant short- or long-term emissions. The City would use the
BAAQMD’s construction and operational screening criteria for park land uses presented in
Table 3-3 to evaluate future park projects or improvements identified in the Master Plan.
Consistent with the BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Guidelines, if the project satisfies all of the screening
criteria, it would not result in a significant air quality impact. As shown in Table 3-3, the
BAAQMD recommends all projects implement certain identified basic construction measures to
reduce and avoid fugitive dust emissions. The implementation of these measures during future
construction projects would ensure that Master Plan projects do not result in significant fugitive
dust impacts. As shown in Table 2-5, the City has incorporated standard design and
construction measures into the planning, design, and implementation of the Master Plan
projects that are within the scope of this IS/MND to control and reduce short-term, construction
related emissions, including the BAAQMD’s recommended basic construction measures.
Given their size, scale, and general lack of substantial emissions sources, the Master Plan
projects within the scope of this IS/MND are likely to satisfy the screening criteria listed in Table
3-3 and, therefore, would result in less than significant air quality impacts at the project-level.
Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in Non-Attainment Pollutants
The SFBAAB is an area of non-attainment for national and state ozone, state PM10, and national
and state PM2.5 air quality standards. Regarding cumulative impacts, the BAAQMD’s CEQA Air
Quality Guidelines state (BAAQMD 2017b, pg. 2-1):
“SFBAAB’s non-attainment status is attributed to the region’s development history. Past,
present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality
impacts on a cumulative basis. By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative
impact. No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of
ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to
existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to
the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be
considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants,
BAAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions
would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance
thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant
adverse air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore,
additional analysis to assess cumulative impacts is unnecessary.”
As described above and discussed under paragraph a), the proposed Master Plan does not
conflict with the BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air Plan and, for Master Plan projects that are within
the scope of this IS, would not result in construction or operational emissions that exceed
BAAQMD construction or operational screening criteria. As such, the Master Plan would not
result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to regional air quality impacts.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 84
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
c)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above, most projects identified in the Master
Plan are small in size and scale and are consistent with the existing active and/or passive
recreational activities at each specific park. Projects involving improving walking trails, replacing
existing equipment and small structures or buildings (e.g., restrooms, shade structures),
developing fitness areas, and enhancing sports fields, etc. would not emit substantial levels of
diesel particulate matter, which is a TAC, or other TACs for prolonged periods of time such that
an adverse health effect would occur at sensitive residential, school, or other receptors that may
be located near (within 1,000 feet) an individual Master Plan project. Although construction of
Master Plan projects would emit criteria and hazardous air pollutants, construction of those
projects would not exceed BAAQMD screening criteria and would be subject to the City’s
construction and design standards pertaining to controlling and reducing construction dust and
exhaust emissions (see Table 2-5). Master Plan projects, therefore, would not expose sensitive
receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
d)Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting
a substantial number of people?
Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of projects would generate odors associated with
construction activities, such as fuel and oil odors and asphalt paving odors. The odors
generated would be intermittent, localized in nature, and would disperse quickly. The Master
Plan would not result in other emissions, including odors, that would adversely affect a
substantial number of people.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 85
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
3.4.1 Environmental Setting
Most of the City’s existing parks are developed and support active and passive sports or
recreation facilities, play equipment, parking lots, and/or landscaped vegetation. The exceptions
are the Stevens Creek Corridor Park (63.7 acres), Creekside Park (13 acres), Linda Vista Park
(11 acres), and a portion of Varian Park along Stevens Creek. The Stevens Creek Corridor Park
consists of the reach of Stevens Creek from McClellan Road to Stevens Creek Boulevard. The
corridor supports riparian vegetation and natural habitat, and steelhead are known to be
resident year-round. Public uses include trails, public swimming pools, group picnic areas,
Stocklmeir Ranch and orchard, McClellan Ranch Preserve, Blackberry Farm Golf Course,
Blackberry Farm Park, and related support facilities. Creekside Park is primarily composed of
soccer fields, open field/lawn area, picnic area, and playgrounds. It is adjacent to Calabazas
Creek. Linda Vista Park consists of an open turf areas, picnic areas, and playgrounds. Linda
Vista Park also contains a large undeveloped area surrounded by additional undeveloped land,
and it is adjacent to Stevens Creek. A small undeveloped portion of Varian Park is also adjacent
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 86
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
to Stevens Creek. Riparian and creek habitat, as well as other natural habitats, also occur
adjacent to the existing and proposed City trail corridors, such as Stevens Creek Trail, Saratoga
Creek Trail, and Regnart Creek Trail.
Methods
Background Research
The following sources for information were reviewed relevant to biological resources within the
Master Plan area:
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database
(CNDDB) record search for nine U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute
quadrangles (i.e., Cupertino, San Jose West, Milpitas, Mountain View, Mindego Hill,
Palo Alto, Big Basin, Los Gatos, and Castle Rock Ridge) surrounding the Master Plan
area and within a 5-mile radius of the Master Plan area (CDFW 2019).
• California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Program Inventory of Rare and
Endangered Plants of California record search within a 5-mile radius of the Master Plan
area (CNPS 2019).
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and
Consultation (IPaC) search within the Master Plan area (USFWS 2019a).
• USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS 2019b).
• City of Cupertino General Plan Community Vision 2015-2040: Chapter 6 Environmental
Resources and Sustainability Element (City of Cupertino 2015b).
• City of Cupertino General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (City of Cupertino
2014b).
• Blackberry Farm Stream Rehabilitation Fish Salvage Field Report (Santa Clara Valley
Water District 2008).
• Final Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Report (Sokale 2002).
• Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2 Project Initial Study and Mitigated
Negative Declaration (TRA Environmental Sciences 2011).
• Biological Resources Assessment Lehigh Permanente Quarry (WRA Environmental
Consultants 2011).
• Apple Campus 2 Project Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report (LSA
Associates 2013).
• Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study (City of Cupertino 2018a)
• McClellan Ranch Parking Area Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (City of
Cupertino 2018b).
• Regnart Creek Trail Feasibility Study (City of Cupertino 2018c)
Vegetation Communities and Other Habitats
The majority of the City is urbanized with most vegetated areas in the City consisting of actively
managed and maintained non-native landscaping. Remnant native trees are scattered
throughout the urbanized areas along with non-native trees, shrubs, and groundcover. In the
western portion of the City near the foothills, the developed areas are bordered by natural areas
supporting a cover of grassland, chaparral and woodlands.
Vegetation communities are assemblages of plant species that occur together in the same area,
which are defined by species composition and relative abundance. Plant communities in the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 87
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Master Plan area were classified using Preliminary Descriptions of Terrestrial Natural
Communities of California (Holland 1986) and A Manual of California Vegetation 2nd edition
(Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 2009). The following vegetation communities are found within the City:
Developed: Developed habitat includes areas where permanent structures and/or
pavement have been placed, which prevents the growth of vegetation. Most of the
existing parks in the Master Plan area include developed habitat, such as pavement,
parking lots, and/or playground areas.
Ornamental Vegetation: Ornamental vegetation includes lands that have been planted
with landscaping and are usually maintained on an ongoing basis. Such landscaping
may include native and non-native plantings. Existing parks contain various species of
ornamental vegetation, including turf grass, ornamental shrubs and trees such as ash
(Fraxinus spp.), American sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), oleander (Nerium
oleander), Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), pine trees
(Pinus spp.), as well as many others. Native trees such as coast redwood (Sequoia
sempervirens), sycamores (Platanus racemosa), and coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)
are also present in some of the parks.
Disturbed/Ruderal: Disturbed/ruderal land includes areas regularly cleared of vegetation,
lands that are composed of primarily non-native plant species, or areas regularly
disturbed by human activities. Within the Master Plan area, disturbed/ruderal land
includes areas where the ground is bare, the soils are compacted, and/or the vegetation
community is dominated by non-native species like brome (Bromus spp.), italian
ryegrass (Festuca perennis), slender oats (Avena barbata), and bristly ox-tongue
(Helminthotheca echioides). Disturbed/ruderal land is present within some parks and
within and along many of the existing and proposed trail alignments.
Coast Live Oak Woodland/Chaparral: Coast live oak woodland is considered a sensitive
natural community by the CDFW. Coast live oak woodland consists of coast live oak as
the dominant tree. A diversity of shrubs/chaparral, especially wild lilac (Ceanothus spp.),
chemise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), manzanita (Arctostaphylos spp.), coyote bush
(Baccharis pilularis) and toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) occur within this habitat. A
number of understory plants occur under or around these large shrubs, California
blackberry (Rubus ursinus), poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum), California sage
(Artemesia californica), and pink flowering current (Ribes sanginium). Coast live oak
woodland interwoven with chaparral occurs over much of the knoll just above Linda Vista
Park and along the southern portion of Linda Vista Park.
Valley Foothill Riparian: Riparian habitat is considered a sensitive natural community by
the CDFW and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Riparian vegetation is
dominated by species that are adapted to wet stream banks, floodplains, and creek
terraces that are seasonally flooded or permanently saturated by freshwater. Trees
within the riparian areas in the City include coast live oak, valley oak, western sycamore,
California buckeye (Aescelus californica), and willow (Salix sp.). Shrubs include coyote
brush, California wild rose (Rosa californica), California blackberry, snowberry
(Symphoricarpos albus), and blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana). Non-native
vegetation, including Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), periwinkle (Vinca
minor), and tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) occur within the riparian areas in the
City. Riparian vegetation is associated with Stevens Creek within the Stevens Creek
Corridor portion of the Master Plan area, Saratoga Creek adjacent to Saratoga Creek
Trail and Sterling Barnhart Park, and Calabazas Creek adjacent to Creekside Park.
Creek: Creeks are protected by a variety of agencies including CDFW, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE), and RWQCB. Creeks are perennial and seasonal linear water
features (i.e., features that flow year-round or throughout the wet season). Numerous
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 88
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
creeks, including Calabazas Creek, Stevens Creek, Regnart Creek, Saratoga Creek,
Heney Creek, and Permanente Creek are present within the Master Plan area. The
banks of many of the creeks are vegetated by valley foothill riparian habitat (see above).
Stevens Creek is a 12.5-mile-long perennial creek that eventually empties into the San
Francisco Bay. Stevens Creek runs through the Stevens Creek Corridor portion of the
Master Plan area. Calabazas Creek is a 13.3-mile-long creek that eventually flows into
Guadalupe Slough in the San Francisco Bay. Historically Calabazas Creek was a
tributary to Saratoga Creek. Calabazas Creek was detached from Saratoga Creek and
re-routed directly into Guadalupe Slough in 1876.Calabazas Creek runs adjacent to
Creekside Park. Saratoga Creek is an approximately 14-mile-long creek that flows into
Guadalupe Slough and the San Francisco Bay. The portion of Saratoga Creek Trail
managed by the City is located adjacent to Saratoga Creek from Bollinger Road to
Sterling Barnhart Park which is also located adjacent to Saratoga Creek. Regnart Creek
is a 4-mile-long creek that flows into Calabazas Creek. Regnart Creek is undergrounded
adjacent to Jollyman Park and runs adjacent to the Civic Center and the proposed
Regnart Creek Trail.
Drainage Ditch: Aquatic habitat, including man-made drainage ditches, may be protected
by CDFW, USACE, and RWQCB. The Junipero Serra Channel runs adjacent to the
proposed Junipero Serra Trail within the City. The Junipero Serra Channel was originally
designed and constructed by Caltrans to intercept drainage on the south side of
Interstate 280 when the freeway was built. The channel generally has a trapezoidal
structure and is concrete lined for much of the corridor. The channel eventually flows into
Calabazas Creek.
Wildlife Likely to Occur
Wildlife in the parks likely consists of common species adapted to urban areas, as well as those
that travel through the Santa Cruz Mountains. Mammals such as eastern fox squirrel (Sciurus
niger), native and non-native mice and rats, Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), raccoon
(Procyon lotor), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), and striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis);
and reptiles or amphibians such as western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), northern
alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea), and California slender salamander (Batrachoseps attenuatus)
are expected to inhabit the parks. Bird species such as Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna),
oak titmouse (Baeolophus inornatus), Nuttall’s woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii), downy
woodpecker (Piciodes pubescens), acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus), black phoebe
(Sayornis nigricans), California scrub-jay (Aphelocoma californica), American crow (Corvus
brachyrhynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), California towhee (Melozonecrissalis),
Wilson’s warbler (Cardellinapusilla), Swainson’s thrush (Catharus ustulatus), and various raptor
species, including red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus),
barn owl (Tyto alba), Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), western screech owl (Megascops
kennicottii), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) could also nest or forage in certain City parks.
Parks would also support butterflies, particularly Steven Creek Corridor Park where monarch
butterflies (Danaus plexippus) are known to occur.
Numerous riparian adapted species likely occur within the Master Plan area parks containing
creeks and drainages, especially the Stevens Creek Corridor Park. Invertebrates such as
Nicklin’s peninsula shoulderband snail (Helminthoglypta nickliniana), quick gloss snail
(Zonotoides arboreus), and native fish species, including Central California Coast steelhead
(Oncorhynchus mykiss), Sacramento sucker (Catostomus occidentalis), California roach
(Lavinia symmetricus), and three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) occur in Stevens
Creek Corridor Park.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 89
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Special-Status Species
For the purposes of this assessment, special-status species include the following:
•Plant or animal species listed, proposed for listing, or candidate for possible future listing
as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA, 50
CFR §17.12);
•Plant or animal species listed or candidate for listing by the State of California as
threatened or endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA, Fish
and Game Code §2050 et seq.);
•Plant species listed as rare under the California Native Plant Protection Act (Fish and
Game Code §1900 et seq.);
•Animal species listed as a Fully Protected (CFP) Species (Fish and Game Code §§3511,
4700, 5050, and 5515);
•Animal species listed as a California Species of Special Concern (CSSC) by the CDFW;
•Plant species considered by CNPS and CDFW to be “rare, threatened, or endangered in
California” (Ranks 1A, 1B, and 2);
The potential occurrence of special-status plant and animal species within the Master Plan area
was evaluated by developing a list of special-status species that are known to or have the
potential to occur in the vicinity of the Master Plan area based on a search of the CNDDB,
CNPS, and USFWS databases. The potential for occurrence of those species included on the
list were then evaluated based on the habitat requirements of each species relative to the
habitat at each park or trail location. Each species was evaluated for its potential to occur on or
in the immediate vicinity of each existing park according to the following criteria:
No Potential: There is no suitable habitat present (i.e., habitats are clearly unsuitable for
the species requirements [e.g., foraging, breeding, cover, substrate, elevation,
hydrology, plant community, disturbance regime]). Additionally, there are no recent
known records of occurrence in the vicinity of the park. The species has no potential of
being found in the park.
Low Potential: Limited suitable habitat is present (i.e., few of the habitat components
meeting the species requirements are present and/or the majority of habitat is unsuitable
or of very low quality). Additionally, there are no or few recent known records of
occurrence in the vicinity of the park. The species has a low probability of being found in
the park.
Moderate Potential. Suitable habitat is present (i.e., some of the habitat components
meeting the species requirements are present and/or the majority of the habitat is
suitable or of marginal quality). Additionally, there are few or many recent known records
of occurrences in the vicinity of the park. The species has a moderate probability of
being found in the park.
High Potential: Highly suitable habitat is present (i.e., all habitat components meeting the
species requirements are present and/or the habitat is highly suitable or of high quality).
Additionally, there are few or many records of occurrences within the last ten years and
within close vicinity of the project area. This species has a high probability of being found
in the park.
Present or Assumed Present. Species has a recent (within five years) recorded
observation in the CNDDB or literature within the park.
A complete list of all special-status species with potential to occur within the Master Plan area,
their regulatory status, and habitat requirements is provided in Appendix B.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 90
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Special-Status Plants
Nine special-status plant species have documented occurrences and/or have potential to occur
within the Master Plan area. Other species were excluded from this list of species possibly
occurring within the Master Plan area due to the lack of essential habitat requirements for the
species, the lack of known occurrences within 5 miles of the Master Plan area, and/or the
Master Plan area is not within the species’ known range of distribution. Although the nine
special-status plant species may occur within the Master Plan area, many of them are not
expected to occur within the existing Master Plan project sites due to the lack of essential
habitat requirements within these areas. However, three special-status plant species have a
moderate potential to occur within one or more Master Plan project sites. The following section
describes the special-status plant species with moderate potential to occur within the existing
parks and/or trails in the Master Plan area in greater detail.
In addition to these three special-status plant species, one CNPS Rare Plant Rank 4.3 species,
Santa Clara red ribbons (Clarkia concinna spp. automixa), has a moderate potential to occur
within one or more Master Plan project areas. Rare Plant Rank 4 species are not afforded
protection under CEQA; however, they are identified as potentially limited in distribution and
may be considered under CEQA since they could become scarcer in the future. As a result, this
section also discusses the potential for Santa Clara red ribbons to occur in the Master Plan
project areas.
Western Leatherwood: Western leatherwood (Dirca occidentalis) listed by the CNPS as
California Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 species. It is a perennial deciduous shrub that is found
in mesic broad-leafed upland forest, closed-cone coniferous forest, chaparral,
cismontane woodland, North Coast coniferous forest, riparian forest, and riparian
woodland habitats. It is generally known from the San Francisco Bay area; specimens
have been collected from Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and
Sonoma counties. Primary threats to this species are the loss of habitat and impacts to
roadside populations during road maintenance. Four CNDDB occurrences for western
leatherwood have been documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. Suitable
habitat for this species is present within the riparian and oak woodland habitat in the
Master Plan area. As a result, western leatherwood could occur in the Stevens Creek
Corridor Park; within riparian habitat adjacent to Creekside Park, Sterling Barnhart Park,
portions of Varian Park next to Stevens Creek, and Saratoga Creek Trail; and within the
oak woodland/chaparral habitat in the undeveloped portion of Linda Vista Park.
Arcuate Bush-Mallow: Arcuate bush-mallow (Malacothamnus arcuatus) is listed by the
CNPS as a California Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 species. It is a perennial evergreen shrub
that is found in chaparral and cismontane woodland. It is generally known from the San
Francisco Bay area, including in Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and San Mateo counties. One
CNDDB occurrence for arcuate bush-mallow has been documented within 5 miles of the
Master Plan area. This species could be present within the oak woodland/chaparral
habitat in the undeveloped portion of Linda Vista Park.
Woodland Woollythreads: Woodland woollythreads (Monolopia gracilens) is listed by the
CNPS as a California Rare Plant Rank 1B.2 species. It is an annual herb that is found in
openings in broad leafed upland forests, chaparral, cismontane woodland, and North
Coniferous forests. It can also be found in valley and foothill grasslands. It is often found
on serpentinite soils. It is generally known from the Central Coast area, including in
Alameda, Contra Costa, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, San Luis
Obispo, and San Mateo counties. Three CNDDB occurrences for woodland woolly
threads have been documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. The most recent
occurrence is recorded from Rancho San Antonio in 2015; the two other occurrences are
older.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 91
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This species could be present within the oak woodland/chaparral habitat in the
undeveloped portion of Linda Vista Park, although serpentine soils are not expected at
this location.
Santa Clara Red Ribbons: Santa Clara red ribbons (Clarkia concinna ssp. automixa) are
listed by the CNPS as California Rare Plant Rank 4.3. This species is an annual herb
that is found in chaparral and cismontane woodland on slopes and near drainages. It is
known from the San Francisco Bay area, including in Alameda, Santa Clara, and Santa
Cruz counties. Three CNDDB occurrences for Santa Clara red ribbons have been
documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. This species was also documented
at the nearby Lehigh Permanente Quarry (WRA Environmental Consultants 2011). This
species could be present within the oak woodland/chaparral habitat in the undeveloped
portion of Linda Vista Park.
Special-Status Wildlife
Twenty-two special-status animal species have documented occurrences and/or have potential
to occur within the Master Plan area. Other species were determined to have no potential to
occur within the Master Plan area due to the lack of essential habitat requirements, the lack of
known occurrences within the Master Plan area, local range restrictions, regional extirpations,
lack of connectivity with areas of suitable or occupied habitat, incompatible land use, and/or
habitat degradation/alteration of on-site or adjacent lands.
Only ten special-status wildlife species are expected to occur within or adjacent to the existing
Master Plan project areas due to the lack of essential habitat requirements for the other twelve
species within or near the parks and/or trails. The following section describes species with
moderate or high potential to occur within the existing parks and/or trails in the Master Plan area
in greater detail.
In addition to these ten special-status animal species, one CDFW Watchlist species, Cooper’s
hawk (Accipiter cooperii) and one species being considered for listing under the FESA, monarch
butterfly (Danuasplexippus), have a moderate or high potential to occur within one or more
Master Plan project areas. Watchlist species and candidate species under the FESA are not
afforded protection under CEQA; however, they may become listed in the future. As a result,
this section also discusses the potential for Cooper’s hawk and monarch butterfly to occur in the
Master Plan project areas.
Monarch Butterfly: The monarch butterfly is not currently listed, but it is being considered
for listing under the FESA. The species is well-known for its north-south migrations from
Canada to Mexico which span the lives of several generations. Monarch butterfly winter
roost sites, typically used between October and February, extend along the West Coast
from Mendocino County in northern California, south to Baja California in Mexico. Winter
roosts consist of hundreds or thousands of monarchs in wind-protected tree groves
close to sources of nectar and water. On the California coast, these roosts usually form
in eucalyptus, but Monterey pine and Monterey cypress groves are also used. During the
breeding season (generally April to August), monarch butterflies lay their eggs on
milkweed (Asclepias spp. or occasionally Gomphocarpus spp. And Calotropis spp.),
which is the sole source of food for monarch caterpillars. Milkweeds are critical for
successful development of the monarch caterpillar into an adult butterfly.
Monarch populations across North America have fallen by as much as 90 percent in the
last two decades and in February 2015, the USFWS showed that nearly a billion
monarchs had vanished from overwintering sites since 1990. The main reason for the
decline has been attributed to herbicides used by farmers and homeowners on
milkweed, the butterfly’s larval host plant. In recent years, the City planted narrow-leaved
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 92
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
milkweed (Asclepiasfascicularis) along Stevens Creek. Since 2015, monarchs are
known to breed within the Master Plan area in the Stevens Creek Corridor Park,
including McClellan Ranch Preserve and Stocklmeir Ranch.
Steelhead-Central California Coast Distinct Population Segment (DPS): Central
California coast steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) is listed as threatened under the
FESA. Central California Coast steelhead DPS includes naturally spawned anadromous
steelhead. Steelhead is an anadromous fish that is native to coastal streams from Baja
California to Alaska and parts of Asia. Adult steelhead migrate from the ocean into
streams in the late fall, winter, or early spring seeking out deep pools within fast moving
streams to rest prior to spawning. Steelhead spawn in shallow water gravel beds and the
young usually spend the first one to two years of their lives as residents of their natal
stream.
Critical habitat for the Central California Coast steelhead DPS was designated on
September 2, 2005 and includes all river reaches and estuarine areas accessible to
listed steelhead in coastal river basins from the Russian River in Sonoma County to
Aptos Creek in Santa Cruz County as well as the drainages of San Francisco Bay and
San Pablo Bay. Stevens Creek is designated critical habitat for Central California Coast
steelhead (NOAA Fisheries 2005).
Central California Coast steelhead historically occurred in Calabazas Creek; however,
this species has not been observed in this creek since 1970. Steelhead are not expected
to occur within this Calabazas Creek due to several impassable barriers to migration
upstream from the San Francisco Bay, including a 13-foot dam and a drop structure.
Steelhead historically migrated from the San Francisco Bay to spawn in Saratoga Creek;
however, an impassable barrier is present at the confluence of Saratoga Creek and San
Tomas Aquino Creek that prevents steelhead from passage into Saratoga Creek.
Stevens Creek is known to support a population of steelhead year-round (Santa Clara
Valley Water District 2008), and steelhead are known to be present year-round in
Stevens Creek in the Stevens Creek Corridor Park.
Santa Cruz Black Salamander: Santa Cruz black salamander (Aneides niger) is
designated as a CSSC. It is found in damp environments on land. This species moves
only during periods of high humidity (e.g., rain events). The Santa Cruz black
salamander is a terrestrial salamander; therefore, it does not live directly in bodies of
water but is generally found in moist areas near streams and creeks in deciduous
woodland, coniferous forest, and coastal grasslands. They may be active year-round
along streams but will stay in moist underground burrows or under rocks, logs or other
objects near streams during dry periods. Six CNDDB occurrences of Santa Cruz black
salamander have been documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area, including in
the vicinity of Permanente Creek near Lehigh Permanente Quarry, near Stevens Creek
Reservoir, and within Stevens Creek near Los Altos. Suitable habitat is present within
the Stevens Creek Corridor Park portion of the Master Plan area. Additional suitable
habitat for this species could also be present within other creeks in the Master Plan area,
including Calabazas Creek and Saratoga Creek.
California Giant Salamander: California giant salamander (Dicamptodonensatus) is
designated as a CSSC. It occurs in wet coastal forests in or near clear, cold permanent
or semi-permanent streams and seepages. They are active on rainy nights and during
daylight in wet periods during winter. Four CNDDB occurrences of California giant
salamander have been documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area, including
within Permanente Creek, Stevens Creek, Stevens Creek Reservoir, and Saratoga
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 93
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Creek. Suitable habitat for this species is present within the creeks throughout the
Master Plan area.
Red-bellied Newt. Red-bellied newt (Taricha rivularis) is a CSSC that has a very limited
range in the San Francisco bay area. In California it is more common in the northwest
portion of the state in streams and rivers in coastal woodlands and redwood forest. An
isolated population occurs in the Stevens Creek watershed, more than 80 miles south of
the known range of the species. The Stevens Creek population was not found to be
genetically divergent from the main population, which has the lowest genetic diversity of
any coastal salamander species, so it hasn’t been determined if it is a natural population
or it was introduced (California Herps.com, accessed 9/7/2019).
California red-legged frog (CRLF): CRLF (Rana draytonii) is listed as threatened under
FESA and is a CSSC. CRLF occurs in grassland, riparian woodland, oak woodland, and
coniferous forest. This species requires quiet freshwater pools, slow-flowing streams,
and freshwater marshes with heavily vegetated shores for breeding. These frogs
typically stay near the shore hidden in vegetation rather than in open water. CRLF
frequently occupies seasonal bodies of water and in some areas these habitats may be
critical for persistence and breeding. CRLF may lie dormant during dry periods of the
year or during drought, utilizing animal burrows (typically California ground squirrel;
Otospermophilus beecheyi) to aestivate. CRLF disperse during the wet months during
autumn, winter, and spring. Recently metamorphosed CRLF expand outward from their
pond of origin and adults migrate toward breeding ponds. Frogs disperse through many
types of upland vegetation and use a broader range of habitats outside of the breeding
season.
Six CNDDB occurrences for CRLF have been documented within 5 miles of the Master
Plan area, including within Permanente Creek, Gate of Heaven Cemetery Pond,
Calabazas Creek, Pichetti Ranch Open Space, and Saratoga Creek. Potentially suitable
habitat for this species is present within and adjacent to numerous creeks in the Master
Plan area, including Calabazas Creek, Saratoga Creek, and Stevens Creek. As a result,
CRLF could occur within or adjacent to Creekside Park, Stevens Creek Corridor Park,
Linda Vista Park, and Saratoga Creek Trail. CRLF could also disperse through Junipero
Sierra Channel and Regnart Creek; therefore, they could occur adjacent to the proposed
Regnart Creek Trail and Junipero Serra Channel.
Western pond turtle (WPT): WPT (Emys mormorata) is designated as a CSSC. WPT is
often seen basking above the water but will quickly slide into the water when it feels
threatened. The species is active from around February to November and may be active
during warm periods in winter. WPT hibernates underwater, often in the muddy bottom
of a pool and may estivate during summer droughts by burying itself in soft bottom mud.
When creeks and ponds dry up in summer, some turtles that inhabit creeks will travel
along the creek until they find an isolated deep pool, others stay within moist mats of
algae in shallow pools while many turtles move to woodlands above the creek or pond
and bury themselves in loose soil where they will overwinter.
Pond turtles are normally found in and along riparian areas, although females have been
reported up to a mile away from water in search of appropriate nest sites. The preferred
habitat for these turtles includes ponds or slow-moving water with numerous basking
sites (e.g., logs, rocks), food sources (i.e., plants, aquatic invertebrates, and carrion),
and few predators (e.g., raccoons, introduced fishes, and bullfrogs). Typically, the
female excavates a nest in hard-packed clay soil in open habitats (usually on south-
facing slopes) within a few hundred yards of a watercourse.
No CNDDB records for WPT have been documented within the Master Plan area. WPT
has been observed within the City, including at McClellan Ranch Preserve. Suitable
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 94
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
riverine habitat for WPT occurs within the Master Plan area in Stevens Creek and may
occur within other creeks in the Master Plan area, including Saratoga Creek and
Calabazas Creek. Suitable grassy, upland nesting habitat for WPT is also present
adjacent to Stevens Creek at McClellan Ranch West, McClellan Ranch Preserve and the
open grassland parcel just north of McClellan Ranch Preserve. As a result, WPT could
occur within or adjacent to Creekside Park, Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Linda Vista
Park, and Saratoga Creek Trail.
Cooper’s Hawk: Cooper’s hawk is a watchlist species. It is a breeding resident
throughout most of the wooded portion of California. It typically occurs in dense stands
of live oak, riparian deciduous, or other forest habitats near water. It often uses patchy
woodlands and edges with snags for perching and dense stands with moderate crown-
depths for nesting. The CNDDB documents a nesting pair in 2003 within the riparian
area along Calabazas Creek. A pair of Cooper’s hawks has also been observed nesting
along Stevens Creek at McClellan Ranch Preserve and Blackberry Farm Park (TRA
Environmental 2011) and consistently observed nesting there by City staff. As a result,
Cooper’s hawk could occur within the Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Linda Vista Park, or
other riparian areas in the Master Plan area.
White-tailed kite: White-tailed kite (Elanusleucurus) is designated as a CFP. White-tailed
kite is resident in a variety of open habitats, including agricultural areas, grasslands,
scrub and open chaparral habitats, meadows, and emergent wetlands throughout the
lower elevations of California. Nests are constructed mostly of twigs and placed in small
to large trees, often at habitat edges or in isolated groves (Dunk 1995). This species
preys upon a variety of small mammals and other vertebrates. One CNDDB occurrence
for white-tailed kite has been documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area where
white-tailed kite was known to breed at the Blackberry Farm Golf Course. As a result,
white-tailed kite could breed within the Master Plan area, including within the Stevens
Creek Corridor Park, Linda Vista Park, and other riparian areas in the Master Plan area.
Yellow warbler: The yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia) is designated as a CSSC. It is
often heard singing from the tops of willow and cottonwood (Populus spp.) trees along
streams and ponds throughout California. This warbler is most abundant in early
succession riparian habitats that possess dense thickets of young willow trees. Yellow
warblers build their nests in the vertical fork of a bush or small tree such as willow or
other riparian species. The nest is typically within about 10 feet of the ground but
occasionally up to about 40 feet. This species primarily feeds on insects (Shuford and
Gardali 2008). No CNDDB records for yellow warbler have been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area. Yellow warbler has frequently been observed nearby the
Master Plan Area at the Lehigh Permanente Quarry (WRA Environmental Consultants
2011). Yellow warbler has been observed in Stevens Creek Corridor Park and
documented in Audubon records in 2002 and May 2009 (B. Banfield, personal
communication). Suitable nesting habitat is present within the riparian corridors in the
Master Plan area and near the City parks. As a result, yellow warbler could nest within
the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and adjacent to Creekside Park, Sterling Bernhart
Park, portions of Varian Park adjacent to Stevens Creek, portions of Linda Vista Park
near Stevens Creek, or the Saratoga Creek Trail.
San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat: The San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat
(Neotoma fuscipes annectens) is designated as a CSSC and is one of eleven historically
described subspecies of the dusky-footed woodrat (packrats) found in forest and
shrubland communities throughout much of California and Oregon. They consume a
wide variety of nuts and fruits, fungi, foliage and some forbs. Many species are good
climbers and rock dwellers, and dusky-footed woodrats are highly arboreal. Evergreen or
live oaks and other thick-leaved trees and shrubs are important habitat components for
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 95
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
the species. This species requires dense understory and disappears if underbrush is
cleared or burned. Woodrat houses have been found in ornamental trees (e.g.
Callistemon spp.; bottlebrush) adjacent to parking lots when there is wooded habitat with
a thick understory close by. If appropriate habitat is present, woodrats can occur quite
close to suburban development.
San Francisco dusky-footed woodrats are nocturnal species that are well known for their
large terrestrial stick houses, some of which can last for twenty or more years. Houses
typically are placed on the ground against or straddling a log or exposed roots of a
standing tree, and are often located in dense brush. Nests are also placed in the
crotches and cavities of trees and in hollow logs. Sometimes arboreal nests are
constructed in habitat with evergreen trees such as live oak.
One CNDDB occurrence for San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat has been documented
within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat houses
have been observed within Blackberry Farm and at Stocklmeir Ranch, as well as
throughout the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and/or oak woodland areas (TRA
Environmental 2011). San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat individuals have been
observed at multiple Stevens Creek Corridor Park sites in recent years. San Francisco
dusky-footed woodrat houses may also be found in other riparian habitat within the
Master Plan area, as well as within oak woodland habitat in the undeveloped portion of
Linda Vista Park.
Pallid Bat: Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) is designated as a CSSC. Pallid bat is found in
dry, open habitats including deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and forests.
This species roosts in protected structures (e.g., old buildings, bridges, caves, mines,
and hollow trees) and rocky outcrops. One CNDDB occurrence for pallid bat has been
documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. Pallid bats have been observed in
the Stevens Creek Corridor on a transient basis during spring and summer seasonal
movements. As a result, pallid bat could occur within the Stevens Creek Corridor Park or
within Linda Vista Park. Pallid bat may also be present within other riparian areas in the
Master Plan area with suitable large trees for roosting.
Nesting Birds and Bats
The trees, shrubs, grasses, and other natural and/or manmade landscapes found within and
adjacent to the existing parks and trails are nesting habitat for bird species. Numerous raptors,
such as red-tailed hawk, red-shouldered hawk, white-tailed kite, Cooper’s hawk, great horned
owl, western screech owl, barn owl, and other bird species are known to nest within Stevens
Creek Corridor Park .
Bats tend to forage and roost near freshwater sources. Some trees (e.g., redwoods, eucalyptus)
and man-made structures within the existing parks, especially those near the riparian corridors
of Stevens Creek, provide suitable bat roosting habitat for bat species, including Pallid bat.
Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis) have been observed in the Stevens Creek corridor and big
brown bat (Eptesicusfuscus) maternity colonies are present at Blackberry Farm (TRA
Environmental 2011).
Sensitive Habitats and Critical Habitat
Sensitive natural communities are communities that are especially diverse; regionally
uncommon; or of special concern to local, state, and federal agencies. Elimination or substantial
degradation of these communities would constitute a significant impact under CEQA. The City
parks contain riparian, creek, ditch, and coast live oak woodland habitat that are considered
sensitive natural communities by the CDFW and other regulatory agencies. Stevens Creek also
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 96
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
contains designated critical habitat Central California Coast steelhead, which is protected by the
USFWS.
Wildlife Movement
Habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation resulting from land use changes or habitat
conversion can alter the use and viability of wildlife movement corridors (i.e., linear habitats that
naturally connect and provide passage between two or more otherwise disjunct larger habitats
or habitat fragments). In general, studies suggest that habitat corridors provide connectivity for
and are used by wildlife, and as such are an important conservation tool (Beier and Noss 1998).
Wildlife habitat corridors should fulfill several functions. They should maintain connectivity for
daily movement, travel, mate-seeking, and migration; plant propagation; genetic interchange;
population movement in response to environmental change or natural disaster; and
recolonization of habitats subject to local extirpation (Beier and Loe 1992).
The suitability of a habitat as a wildlife movement corridor is related to, among other factors, the
habitat corridor’s dimensions (length and width), topography, vegetation, exposure to human
influence, and the species in question (Beier and Loe 1992). Species utilize movement corridors
in several ways. “Passage species” are those species that use corridors as through-ways
between outlying habitats. The habitat requirements for passage species are less than those for
corridor dwellers. Passage species use corridors for brief durations, such as for seasonal
migrations or movement within a home range. As such, movement corridors do not necessarily
have to meet any of the habitat requirements necessary for a passage species’ everyday
survival.
Large herbivores, such as deer and elk, and medium-to-large carnivores, such as coyotes,
bobcats and mountain lions, are typically passage species. “Corridor dwellers” are those
species that have limited dispersal capabilities – a category that includes most plants, insects,
reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, birds – and that use corridors for a greater length of time.
As such, wildlife movement corridors must fulfill key habitat components specific to a species’
life history requirements for them to survive (Beier and Loe 1992).
No mapped habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors are known to be present within
the Master Plan area, except within Stevens Creek Corridor Park. Due to the urban
development surrounding many of the parks and trails and the current use of the existing parks,
it is unlikely that City parks support any migrations. However, many common wildlife species
including raccoon, opossum, striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), terrestrial coast garter snake
(Thamnophis elegans terrestris), and western fence lizard likely use vegetated areas and/or
riparian corridors (e.g., Stevens Creek, Saratoga Creek, Calabazas Creek) within the Master
Plan area for dispersal/movement corridors. Stevens Creek is known to be a migration corridor
for steelhead. Other special-status species such as CRLF, San Francisco dusky-footed
woodrat, and western pond turtle may also use Stevens Creek, Calabazas Creek, or Saratoga
Creek and/or their associated riparian corridors for movement and dispersal.
Aquatic Features
Stevens Creek and its riparian corridor runs through the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and the
park contains wetlands and robust riparian vegetation. Stevens Creek is also adjacent to Linda
Vista Park, and is near an undeveloped portion of Varian Park.
Other parks within the Master Plan area have not been evaluated for wetlands. Calabazas
Creek runs directly adjacent to Creekside Park. Saratoga Creek and its riparian corridor runs
directly adjacent to the Saratoga Creek Trail and Sterling Barnhart Park. Regnart Creek runs
adjacent to the Civic Center, Wilson Park and the proposed Regnart Creek Trail and is
undergrounded beneath Jollyman Park. Junipero Serra Channel runs adjacent to the proposed
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 97
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Junipero Serra Trail. Linda Vista Park contains an undeveloped area which could contain
wetlands.
3.4.1 Regulatory Setting
Biological and water resources in California are protected under federal, state, and local laws.
The laws that may pertain to the biological and water resources within the Master Plan area
include the following.
Federal Regulations
Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA)
The FESA of 1973, as amended, provides the regulatory framework for the protection of plant
and animal species (and their associated critical habitats), which are formally listed, proposed
for listing, or candidates for listing as endangered or threatened under FESA. FESA has the
following four major components: (1) provisions for listing species, (2) requirements for
consultation with the USFWS and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Fisheries, (3) prohibitions against “taking” (i.e., harassing, harming, hunting, shooting,
wounding, killing, trapping, capturing, or collecting, or attempting to engage in any such
conduct) of listed species, and (4) provisions for permits that allow incidental “take”. FESA also
discusses recovery plans and the designation of critical habitat for listed species.
Both the USFWS and NOAA Fisheries share the responsibility for administration of FESA.
Section 7 requires federal agencies, in consultation with, and with the assistance of the USFWS
or NOAA Fisheries, as appropriate, to ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are
not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species or result in
the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat for these species. Non-federal
agencies and private entities can seek authorization for take of federally listed species under
Section 10 of FESA, which requires the preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The U.S. Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 USC §§ 703 et seq., Title 50 Code of Federal
Regulations [CFR] Part 10) states it is “unlawful at any time, by any means or in any manner, to
pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill; attempt to take, capture or kill; possess, offer for sale, sell, offer
to barter, barter, offer to purchase, purchase, deliver for shipment, ship, export, import, cause to
be shipped, exported, or imported, deliver for, transport or cause to be transported, carry or
cause to be carried, or receive for shipment, carriage, or export any migratory bird, any part,
nest, or egg of any such bird, or any product, whether or not manufactured, which consists, or is
composed in whole or in part, of any such bird or any part, nest or egg thereof…” The MBTA
does not protect some birds that are non-native or human-introduced or that belong to families
that are not covered by any of the conventions implemented by MBTA.
The USFWS enforces MBTA. Previously, under MBTA it was illegal to disturb a nest that is in
active use, since this could result in killing a bird, destroying a nest, or destroying an egg. In
2017, the USFWS issued a memorandum stating that the MBTA does not prohibit incidental
take; therefore, the MBTA is currently limited to purposeful actions, such as hunting and
poaching.
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal law regulating water quality. The
implementation of the CWA is the responsibility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). However, the EPA depends on other agencies, such as the individual states and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), to assist in implementing the CWA. The objective of
the CWA is to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the
Nation’s waters.” Section 404 and 401 of the CWA apply to activities that would impact waters
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 98
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
of the U.S. The USACE enforces Section 404 of the CWA and the California State Water
Resources Control Board enforces Section 401.
Section 404
As part of its mandate under Section 404 of the CWA, the EPA regulates the discharge of
dredged or fill material into “waters of the U.S.”. “Waters of the U.S.” include territorial seas, tidal
waters, and non-tidal waters in addition to wetlands and drainages that support wetland
vegetation, exhibit ponding or scouring, show obvious signs of channeling, or have discernible
banks and high-water marks. Wetlands are defined as those areas “that are inundated or
saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that
under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions” (33 CFR 328.3(b)). The discharge of dredged or fill material into
waters of the U.S. is prohibited under the CWA except when it follows Section 404 of the CWA.
Enforcement authority for Section 404 was given to the USACE, which it accomplishes under its
regulatory branch. The EPA has veto authority over the USACE’s administration of the Section
404 program and may override a USACE decision with respect to permitting.
The USACE has specific guidelines for determining the extent of its jurisdiction. The methods of
delineating USACE jurisdiction are defined in the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual
(Environmental Laboratory 1987), and the Arid West Manual (USACE 2008). The methods of
delineating USACE jurisdiction are defined in the manuals and require examination of three
parameters (soil, hydrology, and vegetation).
Substantial impacts to waters of the U.S. may require an Individual Permit. Projects that only
minimally affect waters of the U.S. may meet the conditions of one of the existing Nationwide
Permits, if other conditions of the permit are satisfied. A Water Quality Certification or waiver
pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA is required for Section 404 permit actions.
Section 401
Any applicant for a federal permit to impact waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the CWA,
including Nationwide Permits where pre-construction notification is required, must also provide
to the USACE a certification or waiver from the State of California. The “401 Certification” is
provided by the State Water Resources Control Board through the local Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB).
The RWQCB issues and enforces permits for discharge of treated water, landfills, storm-water
runoff, filling of any surface waters or wetlands, dredging, agricultural activities and wastewater
recycling. The RWQCB recommends that the application for a Certification under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act be made at the same time as other applications are provided to other
agencies, such as the USACE, USFWS, or NOAA Fisheries. The application to the RWQCB is
similar to the pre-construction notification that is required by the USACE. It must include a
description of the habitat that is being impacted, a description of how the impact is to be
minimized, and proposed mitigation measures with goals, schedules, and performance
standards. Mitigation must include a replacement of functions and values, and replacement of
wetland at a minimum ratio of 2:1, or twice as many acres of wetlands provided as are removed.
The RWQCB looks for mitigation that is on site and in-kind, with functions and values as good
as or better than the water-based habitat that is being removed or impacted. A higher mitigation
ratio may be required, depending on site conditions and project impacts.
State Regulations
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act
The intent of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne) is to protect water
quality and the beneficial uses of waters of the State, and it applies to both surface and ground
water. Under this law, the SWRCB develops statewide water quality plans, and the RWQCBs
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 99
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
develop basin plans, which identify beneficial uses, water quality objectives, and implementation
plans. The RWQCBs have the primary responsibility to implement the provisions of both
statewide and basin plans. Waters regulated under Porter-Cologne, referred to as “waters of the
State,” include isolated waters that are not regulated by the USACE. Projects that require a
USACE permit, or fall under other federal jurisdiction, and have the potential to impact waters of
the State are required to comply with the terms of the Water Quality Certification Program. If a
proposed project does not require a federal license or permit, any person discharging, or
proposing to discharge, waste (e.g. dirt) to waters of the State must file either a Notice of Intent
or a Report of Waste Discharge and receive either a Notice of Applicability, waste discharge
requirements (WDRs) or a waiver to WDRs before beginning the discharge.
California Endangered Species Act
The California Endangered Species Act (CESA; Fish and Game Code 2050 et seq.) generally
parallels the federal Endangered Species Act. It establishes the policy of the State to conserve,
protect, restore, and enhance threatened or endangered species and their habitats. Section
2080 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibits the take, possession, purchase, sale, and
import or export of endangered, threatened, or candidate species, unless otherwise authorized
by permit or by the regulations. “Take” is defined in Section 86 of the California Fish and Game
Code as to “hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or
kill.” This definition differs from the definition of “take” under FESA, in that it is specific to take of
an individual, whereas FESA considers modification of habitat as potentially resulting in take.
CESA is administered by CDFW. CESA allows for take incidental to otherwise lawful projects
but mandates that State lead agencies consult with the CDFW to ensure that a project would
not jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species.
Native Plant Protection Act
The Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA) was created in 1977 with the intent to preserve, protect,
and enhance rare and endangered plants in California (California Fish and Game Code sections
1900 to 1913). The NPPA is administered by CDFW, which has the authority to designate native
plants as endangered or rare and to protect them from “take.” CDFW maintains a list of plant
species that have been officially classified as endangered, threatened or rare. These special-
status plants have special protection under California law.
California Fish and Game Code
Non-Game Mammals
Sections 4150-4155 of the California Fish and Game Code protects non-game mammals,
including bats. Section 4150 states “A mammal occurring naturally in California that is not a
game mammal, fully protected mammal, or fur-bearing mammal is a nongame mammal. A non-
game mammal may not be taken or possessed except as provided in this code or in accordance
with regulations adopted by the commission”. The non-game mammals that may be taken or
possessed are primarily those that cause crop or property damage. All bats are classified as a
non-game mammal and are protected under California Fish and Game Code.
Nesting Birds
Nesting birds, including raptors, are protected under California Fish and Game Code Section
3503, which reads, “It is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any
bird, except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation made pursuant thereto.” In
addition, under California Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5, “it is unlawful to take, possess,
or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of-prey) or to take,
possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code
or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto”. Passerines and non-passerine land birds are
further protected under California Fish and Game Code 3513. As such, CDFW recommends
surveys for nesting birds that could potentially be directly (e.g., actual removal of
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 100
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
trees/vegetation) or indirectly (e.g., noise disturbance) impacted by project-related activities.
Disturbance during the breeding season could result in the incidental loss of fertile eggs or
nestlings, or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Disturbance that causes nest abandonment
and/or loss of reproductive effort is considered “take” by CDFW.
California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600-1607
Sections 1600-1607 of the California Fish and Game Code require that a Notification of Lake or
Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) application be submitted to CDFW for “any activity that
may substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed, channel, or
bank of any river, stream, or lake.” The LSAA requirement applies to any work undertaken in or
near a river, stream, or lake that flows at least intermittently through a bed or channel. This
includes ephemeral streams, desert washes, and watercourses with a subsurface flow. CDFW
reviews the proposed actions in the application and, if necessary, prepares an LSAA that
includes measures to protect affected fish and wildlife resources.
Fully Protected Species and Species of Special Concern
The classification of California fully protected (CFP) species was the CDFW’s initial effort to
identify and provide additional protection to those animals that were rare or faced possible
extinction. Lists were created for fish, amphibians and reptiles, birds, and mammals. Most of the
species on these lists have subsequently been listed under CESA and/or FESA. The Fish and
Game Code sections (§5515 for fish, §5050 for amphibian and reptiles, §3511 for birds, §4700
for mammals) deal with CFP species and state that these species “…may not be taken or
possessed at any time and no provision of this code or any other law shall be construed to
authorize the issuance of permits or licenses to take any fully protected species”. “Take” of
these species may be authorized for necessary scientific research. This language makes the
CFP designation the strongest and most restrictive regarding the “take” of these species. In
2003, the code sections dealing with CFP species were amended to allow the CDFW to
authorize take resulting from recovery activities for state-listed species.
California species of special concern (CSSC) are broadly defined as animals not currently listed
under the FESA or CESA, but which are nonetheless of concern to the CDFW because they are
declining at a rate that could result in listing, or historically occurred in low numbers and known
threats to their persistence currently exist. This designation is intended to result in special
consideration for these animals by the CDFW, land managers, consulting biologists, and others,
and is intended to focus attention on the species to help avert the need for costly listing under
FESA and CESA and cumbersome recovery efforts that might ultimately be required. This
designation also is intended to stimulate collection of additional information on the biology,
distribution, and status of poorly known at-risk species, and focus research and management
attention on them.
Sensitive Vegetation Communities
Sensitive vegetation communities are natural communities and habitats that are either unique in
constituent components, of relatively limited distribution in the region, or of particularly high
wildlife value. These communities may or may not necessarily contain special-status species.
Sensitive natural communities are usually identified in local or regional plans, policies or
regulations, or by the CDFW (i.e., CNDDB) or the USFWS. The CNDDB identifies several
natural communities as rare, which are given the highest inventory priority (Sawyer et. al. 2009;
CDFW 2018).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 101
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Local Regulations
General Plan
The City of Cupertino General Plan Chapter 6: Environmental and Sustainability Element
(Cupertino 2015b) addresses protection of biological resources within the City limits. The
following policies and strategies apply to the Master Plan.
•Policy ES-5.1 Urban Ecosystem. Manage the public and private development to ensure
the protection and enhancement of its urban ecosystem.
•Strategy ES-5.1.1 Landscaping. Ensure that the City’s tree planting, landscaping and
open space policies enhance the urban ecosystem by encouraging medians, pedestrian-
crossing curb-extensions planting that is native, drought-tolerant, treats stormwater and
enhances urban plant, aquatic and animal resources in both, private and public
development.
•Strategy ES-5.1.2 Built Environment. Ensure that sustainable landscaping design is
incorporated in the development of City facilities, parks and private projects with the
inclusion of measures such as tree protection, stormwater treatment and planting of
native, drought tolerant landscaping that is beneficial to the environment.
•Policy ES-5.2 Development Near Sensitive Areas. Encourage the clustering of new
development away from sensitive areas such as riparian corridors, wildlife habitat and
corridors, public open space preserves, and ridgelines. New development in these areas
must have a harmonious landscaping plan approved prior to development.
•Strategy ES-5.2.1 Riparian Corridor Protection. Require the protection of riparian
corridors through the development approval process.
•Policy ES-5.3 Landscaping in and near Natural Vegetation. Preserve and enhance
existing natural vegetation, landscape features and open space when new development
is proposed within existing natural areas. When development is proposed near natural
vegetation, encourage the landscaping to be consistent with the palate of vegetation
found in the natural vegetation.
•Strategy ES-5.3.1 Native Plants. Continue to emphasize the planting of native, drought
tolerant, pest resistant, non-invasive, climate appropriate plants and ground covers,
particularly for erosion control and to prevent disturbance of the natural terrain.
•Strategy ES-5.3.2 Hillsides. Minimize lawn area in the hillsides.
•Policy ES-5.4 Hillside Wildlife Migration. Confine fencing on hillside property to the area
around a building, rather than around an entire site, to allow for migration of wild
animals.
•Policy ES-5.5 Recreation and Natural Vegetation. Limit recreation in natural areas to
activities compatible and appropriate with preserving natural vegetation, such as hiking,
horseback riding, mountain biking and camping.
•Policy ES-5.6 Recreation and Wildlife. Provide open space linkages within and between
properties for both recreational and wildlife activities, most specifically for the benefit of
wildlife that is threatened, endangered or designated as species of special concern.
•Strategy ES-5.6.1 Creek and Watercourse Identification. Require identification of creeks,
water courses and riparian areas on site plans and require that they be protected from
adjacent development.
•Strategy ES-5.6.2 Trail Easements. Consider requiring easements for trail linkages if
analysis determines that they are needed.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 102
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy ES-7.1: Natural Waterbodies and Drainage Systems. In public and private
development, use Low Impact Development (LID) principles to manage stormwater by
mimicking natural hydrology, minimizing grading and protecting or restoring natural
drainage systems.
• Strategy ES-7.1.1 Development Plans. Continue to require topographical information;
identification of creeks, streams and drainage areas; and grading plans for both public
and private development proposals to ensure protection and efficient use of water
resources.
City of Cupertino Tree Ordinance
The City of Cupertino’s Protected Tree Ordinance (Ordinance Number 07-2003, Chapter 14.18
of the Municipal Code) requires a permit to remove protected trees from public or private
property. Protected trees include trees of the following species that have a minimum single trunk
diameter of 10 inches (31-inch circumference) or minimum multi-trunk diameter of 20 inches
(63-inch circumference) measured 4.5 feet from the natural grade: native oak tree (Quercus sp.)
species, including coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), black oak
(Quercus kelloggii), blue oak (Quercus douglasii), and interior live oak (Quercus wislizeni);
California buckeye (Aesculus californica); big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum); deodar cedar
(Cedrus deodara); blue atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica ‘Glauca’); bay laurel or California bay
(Umbellularia californica); and western sycamore (Platanus racemosa).
Protected trees also include heritage trees, approved privacy protection plantings in R-1 zoning
districts, and trees required to be protected as a part of a zoning, tentative map, or use permit.
Application for designation as a heritage tree is referred to the Planning Commission for review
and determination in accordance with Chapter 19.124 of the Municipal Code. The Planning
Commission may, by resolution, designate a tree or grove of trees as a heritage tree(s).
Development projects are subject to Chapter 14.18, Appendix A of the Municipal Code:
“Standards for the Protection of Trees during Grading and Construction”. The removal of
protected trees generally requires the planting of replacement trees, in accordance with the
Replacement Tree Guidelines in the Cupertino Tree Ordinance.
City of Cupertino Water Resource Protection Ordinance
The City of Cupertino’s Water Resource Protection Ordinance for Properties Adjacent to a
Stream (Ordinance Number 07-1992, Chapter 9.19 of the Municipal Code) requires a permit for
modifications to streamside properties under the jurisdiction of the City, except for the following
modifications:
• Less than three cubic yards of earthwork provided it does not damage, weaken, erode,
or reduce the effectiveness of the stream to withhold storm and flood waters.
• A fence that is six feet or less in height or is otherwise permitted by the City.
• An accessory structure 120 square feet or less in size.
• Interior or exterior additions or alterations to structures within the existing footprint.
• Landscaping on an existing single-family lot.
A request for stream modification permit must be filed with the City for any proposed
modification to a stream other than those modifications listed above. The Santa Clara Valley
Water Resources Protection Collaborative, whose members include the SCVWD and City,
developed the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams: A Manual of Tools,
Standards, and Procedures to Protect Streams and Streamside Resources in Santa Clara
County. This IS/MND includes requirements and recommendations for land use activities in and
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 103
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
around Santa Clara County streams, in order to protect stream resources. Stevens Creek is
within the City’s jurisdiction and a permit would be needed for modifications to this creek.
Santa Clara Valley Water District Water Resources Protection Ordinance
The SCVWD (now also known as Valley Water) owns property along many of the City creeks,
including Calabazas Creek, Stevens Creek, Regnart Creek, Junipero Serra Channel, and
Saratoga Creek. The SCVWD requires that an Encroachment Permit for any construction work
or modification proposed within the SCVWD facility or easement with the following exceptions:
• An encroachment permit is not required for access onto Valley Water facilities or
easements that have been opened to and developed for public recreational purposes or
when the permit authority determines that access requirements applicable thereto have
already been established by contract or operation of law.
• Where Valley Water holds a nonexclusive easement, the owner of the underlying fee is
not required to obtain an encroachment permit for activities not in conflict with the Valley
Water easement unless the easement requires Valley Water approval for the activity or
work.
The Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams developed by the Water Resources
Protection Collaborative includes requirements and recommendations for land use activities in
and around Santa Clara County streams, in order to protect stream resources.
3.4.2 Discussion
Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction
of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and implementation
information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to
determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent
environmental review is required.
Many of the existing parks are landscaped and do not provide suitable habitat for special-status
plant or animal species, do not contain sensitive natural communities or federally protected
wetlands, and do not provide a migratory wildlife corridor. Parks that contain undeveloped
natural lands and/or are near riparian corridors do have the potential to support special-status
plant or animal species, contain sensitive natural communities, contain wetlands, and support
wildlife migration (such as steelhead, which may rely on trees along the waterway to protect
water temperatures along their migratory routes, for example).
Projects implemented under the Master Plan in parks that are currently landscaped and/or
hardscaped are not expected to result in significant biological impacts. Projects in these parks
that introduce or maintain plants that support pollinator species and birds with a variety of
flowering species and water sources could provide a net biological benefit by increasing
resources and supporting biological diversity.
Projects implemented under the Master Plan in parks that contain undeveloped natural lands
and/or are near riparian corridors could result in significant impacts if special-status species,
sensitive natural communities, wetlands, or wildlife migration are impacted by project activities.
Projects implemented under the Master Plan would be designed, built, and maintained by the
City in a manner consistent with local policies that protect biological resources. Some projects
may require authorization from the CDFW under California Fish and Game Code section 1600,
the USACE under section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, the USFWS and/or NOAA
Fisheries under the federal Endangered Species Act, and/or the RWQCB under the federal
Clean Water Act section 401 or under the state Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act.
Projects subject to these authorizations would be required to comply with permit conditions and
reporting requirements enforced by those agencies.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 104
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The project area is not within an adopted plan area for a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural
Communities Conservation Plan.
Would the proposed project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-
status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or
by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. (Responses a-d). For the purposes of this
response, use of the term “special-status species” includes everything listed under question (a)
above.
As noted above, some projects that would be implemented under the Master Plan could impact
special-status species, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, wildlife corridors, and/or wildlife
nursery sites. Over the approximately 20-year time period that the plan will be implemented, the
biological environment may change, and the methods used to protect biological resources are
expected to evolve based on scientific research and changes in standard practices. Therefore,
the following programmatic mitigation measure is recommended to prevent significant impacts
to special-status species, sensitive natural communities, and wetlands, as defined by state and
federal law, and on wildlife corridors or nursery sites.
Impact BIO-1: Future park projects could impact special-status species, sensitive communities,
wetlands and wildlife corridors, as defined by state and federal law.
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: The Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) for Parks and
Recreation improvements shall be reviewed annually by staff to identify projects that could
potentially affect special-status species, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, wildlife
corridors, and/or native wildlife nursery sites. Any such projects shall be reviewed by a
professional in field biology. The biological professional shall:
a) Research the potential occurrence of special-status species and sensitive communities in the
areas affected by CIP projects by reviewing the California Natural Diversity Database, California
Native Plant Society Inventory, IPaC, or other appropriate databases, by contacting resource
agencies such as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and/or
NOAA Fisheries Service, or other appropriate methods.
b) For each CIP project approved for funding that could impact special-status species, sensitive
natural communities, wetlands, wildlife corridors, and/or nursery sites during construction or as
a result of the proposed use, including maintenance, prior to the start of construction identify all
resource agency permits required for the project and ensure that the project is modified as
necessary to minimize effects on biological resources and avoid impacts.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 105
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
c) For each CIP project that could have a significant impact on special-status species, sensitive
natural communities, wetlands, wildlife corridors, and/or native wildlife nursery sites, specify
measures to avoid impacts or to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level that will be
implemented as part of the project. Indicate the timing of when the measures would be
implemented (e.g., prior to construction activities, during construction, post-construction etc.).
These measures may include actions such as the following currently accepted measures:
1. Pre-construction surveys for special-status plant and animal species, nesting birds, and
roosting bats in the correct season and using CNPS, CDFW and/or other accepted
protocols, as appropriate, to identify if the species are present and would be impacted by
the project;
2. Wildlife exclusion fencing to prevent species, such as protected amphibians and reptiles,
from entering the work site. Regular fence inspections, to assure that species are not
trapped and to maintain the integrity of the fence.
3. Clear delineation of the work area and/or protected areas in the field to prevent
construction activities from extending beyond required work areas and into nearby
natural areas that contain sensitive species habitat or sensitive natural communities or
wetlands. Environmentally sensitive areas may also be delineated on construction
drawings for certain projects.
4. Silt fencing or other erosion control measures to protect water quality downstream of the
project and the biological resources that rely on suitable water quality.
5. Worker environmental awareness training provided by a qualified professional (typically
a biologist) prior to the start of any project activities that affect the physical environment
to educate workers about the presence of environmentally sensitive areas, what species
may be present, what laws protect the species, and what to do if a special-status
species is encountered.
6. Construction site sanitation to dispose of food and beverage waste and associated
wrappers or containers to minimize site attractiveness to wildlife during construction.
7. Wildlife protection measures, such as minimizing the use of monofilament netting which
can ensnare reptiles and amphibians, covering trenches near suitable habitat so that
species are not trapped and unable to hide from a predator, and/or daily pre-construction
sweeps to verify special-status species are not present in the work area.
8. Actions to take if special-status species are discovered, such as establishment of buffer
zones or other measures acceptable to resource agencies to protect the individual
species.
Effectiveness: Implementation of Measure BIO-1 would avoid or reduce significant impacts to
special-status species, sensitive natural communities, wetlands, and migratory wildlife corridors
and nursery sites to a less than significant level.
Implementation: Measure BIO-1 shall be completed by, or overseen by, a qualified
professional with expertise in field biology, biological impact assessment, and resource agency
permits. The results shall be documented in field records, consultation notes, and/or reports, as
determined appropriate by the professional or as required by resource agency permits obtained
for the project.
Timing: City staff will review the adopted CIP each year after funding is approved to determine
if the funded projects need to be reviewed by a qualified professional biologist. Project-specific
timing for each measure to be implemented would be identified by the qualified professional
when the project’s scope and design is adequately defined to allow determination of appropriate
measures, and before finalizing the design for bidding or construction.
Monitoring: Site-specific monitoring as indicated by the qualified professional with project
specific review. Proof that the mitigation measure has been implemented will be provided
through biological documentation for each project that requires biological review.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 106
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Less than Significant Impact. Projects implemented under the Master Plan would be
designed, built, and maintained by the City in a manner consistent with the City’s General Plan
policies and the City of Cupertino’s Protected Tree Ordinance (Ordinance Number 07-2003,
Chapter 14.18 of the Municipal Code, see Regulatory Setting above) and implementation of
“Standards for the Protection of Trees during Grading and Construction”. The removal of
protected trees requires the planting of replacement trees, in accordance with the Replacement
Tree Guidelines in the Cupertino Tree Ordinance.
None of the policies in the Master Plan are expected to adversely impact biological resources,
and compliance with the biology-related Master Plan goal, objectives, and actions listed in Table
2-2 will protect biological resources.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP),
Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan (SCVHP) was prepared by Santa Clara County
and a number of participating local agencies to provide a framework to protect, enhance, and
restore natural resources in the County. The City was not a participating local partner and the
SCVHP does not include any locations within the City boundary. As a result, the Master Plan
area is not within an area covered by an HCP or NCCP. The Master Plan would, therefore, not
conflict with the provisions of an HCP or NCCP.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 107
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
3.5.1 Environmental Setting
The City of Cupertino is a relatively modern city, having little widespread construction until the
middle of the 20th Century. Much of the history of the City comes from the technology boom in
the early 1960s and continuing through today. There is little surviving evidence of Native
American use of the area and there have been no major archaeological discoveries within the
City.
Prehistoric
The area encompassed by the City of Cupertino is a region historically occupied by the Tamyen
linguistic group of the Ohlone (first called the Costanoan, or “coastal dwellers” by the Spanish),
near the linguistic boundary with the Ramaytush group (City of Cupertino 2014).
The Ohlone lived in tribelets or nations that were dialect distinct from each other, autonomous,
and territorially separated from each other. Each tribelet consisted of one or more permanent
villages, with various seasonal temporary encampments located throughout their territory for the
gathering of raw material resources, hunting, and fishing.
The Ohlone lived in extended family units in domed dwellings constructed from tule, grass, wild
alfalfa, and ferns. The subsistence practices included the consumption of plant resources such
acorns, buckeyes, and seeds that were supplemented with the hunting of elk, deer, grizzly bear,
mountain lions, sea lions, whales, and waterfowl. The Ohlone peoples practiced controlled
burning on an annual basis throughout their territory as a form of land management to ensure
plant and animal yields for the coming year (Levy 1987).
Historic
The first Europeans to reach the San Francisco Bay area were Spanish explorers in 1769 as
part of the Portolá expedition. In 1774, the de Anza expedition had set out to convert the Native
American tribes to Christianity, resulting in the establishment of (among others) Mission San
Francisco de Asis (Mission Dolores), founded in 1776 and Mission Santa Clara de Asis,
founded in 1777. The Mission at Santa Clara was also known as Mission Santa Clara de
Thamien in reference to the Tamyen people. In 1776, Captain Juan Bautista de Anza led an
expedition from Sonora, Mexico, up the coast of California, aiming to establish a presidio (fort)
on San Francisco Bay. Leaving most of his party in Monterey to rest, De Anza continued north
with Pedro Font, a Franciscan priest, diarist and cartographer, and 18 other men. As they
passed through the Santa Clara Valley, Font bestowed the name Arroyo San Jose de Cupertino
on the stream that now is called Stevens Creek.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 108
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The native Tamyen people were slowly subjugated and absorbed into the Mission system. By
1795, all the Tamyen villages had been abandoned and the people baptized into the Christian
faith (City of Cupertino 2014).
The village of West Side was established in the 19th Century at the crossroads of Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road (now De Anza Boulevard) and Stevens Creek Road. Many of Cupertino’s
pioneer settlers planted grapes in the late 1800s. Vineyards, orchards, and wineries proliferated
on Montebello Ridge, on the lower foothills, and on the flat lands below. Almost all the land
within Cupertino's present-day boundaries was covered by crop orchards, such as prune, plum,
apricot, and cherry.
By 1898, the West Side post office at the Crossroads needed a new name to distinguish it from
other similarly named towns. John T. Doyle, a San Francisco lawyer and historian, had given
the name Cupertino to his winery, in recognition of the name bestowed on the nearby creek by
Petrus Font. In 1904, the name was applied to the Crossroads and to the post office when the
Home Union Store incorporated under the name, The Cupertino Store, and moved to the
northeast corner of the Crossroads.
As the orchards flourished, the valley became known for a profusion of blossoms in spring.
Many more people passed through the Cupertino area first by electric railway and later by car to
view all the blossoms in the “Valley of Heart’s Delight.” Because of the electric railway, the
Monta Vista area of Cupertino developed. Monta Vista was the name of its first housing tract
(City of Cupertino 2019a).
By the late 1940’s, Cupertino was swept up in Santa Clara Valley’s postwar population
explosion.
Modern History
Today, Cupertino is part of a world-renowned high technology center, known as “Silicon Valley,”
and is home to several companies producing leading-edge computers and software. However, it
was not until the post-World War II economic boom, that Cupertino began to significantly grow
in size. In 1950 it had grown from a little more than a crossroads surrounded by a few houses to
a population of 2,438 (Bay Area Census 2018). It was incorporated in 1955 by election on the
27th of September. Cupertino officially became Santa Clara County’s 13th city on October 10,
1955. In 1960, the City’s population was 3,664. By 2010, the population had grown to 58,302.
(City of Cupertino 2019a). Much of the reason for that growth can be linked either directly or
indirectly to the emerging technology boom from the early 1960s which started with Varian
Electronics, an electronics firm. Silicon Valley Apple Computer (now simply called Apple)
emerged in Cupertino in 1977, and other significant technology companies (such as Hewlett
Packard, Portal Software, NetManage, Symantec, etc.) emerged over the following decades.
Today, the private sector in Cupertino is dominated by high-tech companies and numerous
small businesses.
Archaeological Resources
The General Plan EIR identified two documented archaeological resources: CA‐SCL‐715 and
CA‐SCL‐69, both of which were identified as Native American sites (City of Cupertino 2014).
Further communication with Placeworks, which prepared the General Plan EIR, clarified that
only one of the resources, CA-SCL-715 (P-43-000633), is within City boundaries. The other
resource, CA-SCL-69, is outside the City boundaries (T. McCracken 2019). Resource CA-SCL-
715 (P-43-000633) is recorded as being within the boundary of Stevens Creek Corridor Park
(Basin 2006).
Historic Resources
Historic resources consist of resources in the built environment, including standing buildings and
structures, which are greater than fifty years in age. As of March 2019, there were eight
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 109
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
properties in Cupertino listed in the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Directory of
Historic Properties (OHP 2019). These resources have been evaluated for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places, and most have been evaluated for state or local listing as
well.
The General Plan EIR (Cupertino 2014b), identified 62 historical period buildings, structures,
and landmarks as being within the City of Cupertino. There are 73 total cultural resources listed
within the EIR. However, five of these are duplicates, coming under multiple entries; two are
prehistoric sites, mentioned above; and four are outside of the City’s boundary and Sphere of
Influence (SOI). A table and map of the resources can be seen in Appendix C.
Historic Resources in Master Plan Area
The project area consists of all the City of Cupertino’s parks and recreational facilities operated
by the City. All the parks and recreational facilities within the Master Plan, with the exception of
Saratoga Creek Trail, are located in incorporated Cupertino. Saratoga Creek Trail is operated
by the City and covered by a joint use agreement with the other public agency owners. Land
that the trail is anticipated to be annexed by the City in the future.
There are four existing parks/recreational facilities that contain, or are directly adjacent to,
known historical resources including historic sites, commemorative sites, community landmarks,
and other built environment historic resources; Civic Center/Community Hall, Jollyman Park,
Memorial Park, and Stevens Creek Corridor Park. Table 3-4 presents a list of which resources
are within each park/recreational facility.
Table 3-4 Parks/Recreation Facilities Containing or Adjacent to Historic Resources
Civic Center /
Community Hall
Jollyman Park Memorial Park Stevens Creek
Corridor Park
Cupertino Civic
Center1
Good Shepherd
Church2(adjacent)
Gazebo Trim1 Baer Blacksmith1
Community Center
Sports Complex1
Enoch J. Parrish
Tank House1
Nathan Hall Tank
House1
Stocklmeir
Farmhouse1
Elisha Stephens
Place1
Sources:
1 City of Cupertino Historically Significant Resource
2 SHPO Recorded Cultural Resource
3.5.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing cultural resources exist to protect
cultural, historic, and paleontological resources from damage and destruction. Violation of these
laws and regulations would constitute a significant impact to cultural and paleontological
resources. The laws and policies that pertain to the cultural resources potentially present in city
parks or are affected by potential Master Plan projects are discussed below.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 110
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Federal
National Historic Preservation Act
Significant archaeological and built environment resources are protected by the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The National Register is an inventory of the United States'
historic resources and is maintained by the National Park Service. The inventory includes
buildings, structures, objects, sites, districts, and archeological resources meeting the following
criteria as specified in the Code of Federal Regulations
The criteria for determining whether a property is eligible for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) are found in Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 60.4
and are reproduced below:
The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and
culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of
location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and
a. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of our history; or
b. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or
c. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of
construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic
values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinctions; or
d. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or
history.
For a property to qualify for the NRHP, it must meet at least one of the above National Register
Criteria for Evaluation by being associated with an important context and retaining historic
integrity of those features necessary to convey its significance.
State
California Environmental Quality Act
Pursuant to CEQA, a historical resource is a resource listed in, or eligible for listing in, the
California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR); see CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(a)(1). In
addition, resources included in a local register of historic resources or identified as significant in
a local survey conducted in accordance with state guidelines are also considered historic
resources under CEQA, unless a preponderance of the facts demonstrates otherwise; see
CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(a)(2)-(3). The fact that a resource is not listed in or determined
eligible for listing in the CRHR or is not included in a local register or survey shall not preclude a
lead agency from determining that the resource may be a historic resource as defined in
California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5024.1; see CEQA Guidelines §
15064.5(a)(4). CEQA applies to archaeological resources when (1) the archaeological resource
satisfies the definition of a historical resource or (2) the archaeological resource satisfies the
definition of a “unique archaeological resource”; see CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(c). If an
archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor a historical resource, the effects
of a project on those resources shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment;
see CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(c)(4), PRC 21083.2(h).
A unique archaeological resource is an archaeological artifact, object, or site that has a high
probability of meeting any of the following criteria:
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 111
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
1. The archaeological resource contains information needed to answer important
scientific research questions and there is a demonstrable public interest in that
information.
2. The archaeological resource has a special and particular quality such as being the
oldest of its type or the best available example of its type.
3. The archaeological resource is directly associated with a scientifically recognized
important prehistoric or historic event or person.
California Register of Historical Resources
The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) administers CRHR, which was established in 1992
though amendments to the PRC, as an authoritative guide to be used by state and local
agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources and to indicate
what properties are to be protected from substantial adverse change. The CRHR includes
resources that have been formally determined eligible for, or listed in, the NRHP, State
Historical Landmark Number 770 or higher, Points of Historical Interest recommended for listing
by the State Historical Resources Commission, resources nominated for listing and determined
eligible in accordance with criteria and procedures adopted by the State Historical Resources
Commission, and resources and districts designated as city or county landmarks when the
designation criteria are consistent with CRHR criteria. To be eligible for the CRHR, a resource
must:
a. Be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of local or regional history or the cultural history of California or the
United States; or
b. Be associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national
history; or
c. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of
construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic
values; or
d. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the
prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation.
A resource should generally be 50 years old to be considered eligible, although the OHP has
issued guidance on evaluating potential historic resources before they are 50 years old. The
OHP’s guidance states that if enough time has passed in order to “gain a scholarly perspective”
on the resource, then it can be considered as a potential resource (OHP 2015). Additionally, a
resource must possess several of the seven aspects of integrity to be eligible for listing in the
NRHP and/or the CRHR. Integrity is defined as “…the authenticity of an historical resource’s
physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource’s
period of significance” (OHP 2006). The seven levels of integrity are location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Resources that are listed in the NRHP are
automatically eligible for the CRHR (PRC §5024.1(c)).
Both NRHP and CRHR evaluations must be made within an appropriate historic context. A
historic context includes three components: a time period, place, and event. A historic context is
developed through one or more research themes to help identify the resources’ significance at
the local, state, or national level. A resources’ integrity is based on its ability to convey its
significance through data requirements. Data requirements can best be described as evidence
found within the archaeological record that conveys the resources’ historical significance. If the
appropriate data requirements are lacking, the resource arguably lacks significance and is
therefore not an eligible resource.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 112
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
California Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52
AB52 creates a formal consultation process which requires a lead agency, prior to the release of
a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report for a
project, to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and
culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project if: (1) the California Native
American tribe requested the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency through
formal notification of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and culturally
affiliated with the tribe, and (2) the California Native American tribe responds, in writing, within
30 days of receipt of the formal notification and requests the consultation. (PRC § 21080.3.1)
California Health and Safety Code, Sections 7050 and 7052
California H&SC Section 7050.5 requires that, in the event of the discovery of human remains
outside a dedicated cemetery, all ground disturbances must cease, and the county coroner
must be notified. Section 7052 establishes a felony penalty for mutilating, disinterring, or
otherwise disturbing human remains, except by relatives.
Public Resources Code Section 5097.5
Public Resources Code Section 5097.5 states, “it is illegal for any person to knowingly and
willfully excavate or remove, destroy, injure, or deface cultural resources.” Furthermore, the
crime is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $10,000 and/or county jail time for
up to one year. In addition to a fine and/or jail time, the court can order restitution, and
restitution will be granted of the commercial and archaeological value of the property.
Penal Code Section 622.5
Penal Code Section 622.5 provides misdemeanor penalties for injuring or destroying objects of
historic or archaeological interest located on public or private lands but specifically excludes the
landowner.
Local Regulations
General Plan
The following policies from the Cupertino General Plan relate to Cultural Resources.
• Policy LU-6.1 Historic Preservation. Maintain and update an inventory of historically
significant structures and sites in order to protect resources and promote awareness of
the City’s history in the following four categories: Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites,
Community Landmarks and Historic Mention Sites.
• Policy LU-6.2 Historic Sites. Projects on Historic Sites shall meet the Secretary of
Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties.
• Policy LU-6.3 Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites and Community Landmarks. Projects
on Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites and Community Landmarks shall provide a
plaque, reader board and/or other educational tools on the site to explain the historic
significance of the resource. The plaque shall include the city seal, name of resource,
date it was built, a written description and photograph. The plaque shall be placed in a
location where the public can view the information.
• Policy LU-6.4 Public Access. Coordinate with property owners of public and quasi-public
sites to allow public access of Historic and Commemorative Sites to foster public
awareness and education. Private property owners will be highly encouraged, but not
required, to provide public access to Historic and Commemorative Sites.
• Policy LU-6.5 Historic Mention Sites. These are sites outside the City’s jurisdiction that
have contributed to the City’s history. Work with agencies that have jurisdiction over the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 113
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
historical resource to encourage adaptive reuse and rehabilitation and provide public
access and plaques to foster public awareness and education.
• Policy LU-6.6 Incentives for Preservation of Historic Resources. Utilize a variety of
techniques to serve as incentives to foster the preservation and rehabilitation of Historic
Resources including: 1. Allow flexible interpretation of the zoning ordinance not essential
to public health and safety. This could include land use, parking requirements and/or
setback requirements. 2. Use the California Historical Building Codes standards for
rehabilitation of historic structures. 3. Tax rebates (Milles Act or Local tax rebates). 4.
Financial incentives such as grants/loans to assist rehabilitation efforts.
• Policy LU-6.8 Cultural Resources. Promote education related to the City’s history
through public art in public and private developments.
3.5.3 Discussion
The adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific park enhancement,
improvement, or other development action identified in the Master Plan. Since project-specific
information is not available at this time, potential impacts to cultural and historic resources can
only be evaluated at a program-level, based on the likely construction and operational activities
associated with the Master Plan projects. Once project-level information is developed for
improvements proposed to be implemented under the Master Plan, the City would review the
project under CEQA and determine the appropriate level of environmental review. In the
absence of even conceptual-level design and implementation information, this IS/MND cannot
evaluate the potential environmental impacts of some of the actions contemplated in the Master
Plan. Future review of these projects/improvements would focus on site-specific environmental
issues that could not be examined in sufficient detail as part of this IS/MND.
In general, the potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development actions
identified in the Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS/MND (see Section 2.7) are small
in size (i.e., potential projects do not have a large footprint) and scale (i.e., potential projects do
not involve substantial expansion of existing park and recreational facilities or the development
of significant new facilities) and are compatible with the existing active and/or passive
recreational nature of the specific park type where the improvement would occur (e.g.,
community park, large neighborhood park, small neighborhood park, etc.). The potential cultural
and historic resource impacts of these projects are considered and evaluated below. Examples
of the types of projects that are within the scope of this IS/MND generally include but are not
limited to the opportunities listed in Section 2.7.
Would the proposed project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
Less Than Significant Impact. Most existing City parks do not contain historic resources,
however Table 3-4 Parks/Recreation Facilities Containing or Adjacent to Historic Resources
lists historic resources in or adjacent to parks and recreational facilities that could be affected by
implementation of the Master Plan. The four parks that contain historic resources are Civic
Center / Community Hall, Jollyman Park, Memorial Park, and Stevens Creek Corridor Park.
Although the Master Plan presents immediate, short-term and long-term opportunities for the
Civic Center / Community Hall and for Stevens Creek Corridor Park, a site-specific master plan
will be prepared for Stevens Creek Corridor Park, and a site-specific master plan has been
prepared for the Civic Center and was adopted by the City Council in July 2015 together with
associated environmental documents The site-specific master plan for Stevens Creek Corridor
Park would further develop enhancement opportunity ideas and would be developed consistent
with adopted City policy, including land use policies described in the Regulatory Setting
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 114
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
regarding the protection of cultural/historic resources. Conformance with adopted City policies
would serve to reduce or eliminate potential impacts on sensitive cultural resources. The
Stevens Creek Corridor site-specific master plan would undergo separate CEQA review to
analyze the potential environmental impacts of implementing the master plan enhancement
opportunities.
Improvements considered in the short term for Jollyman Park include a replacement of an
existing play area with an all-inclusive one, grouped seating, a picnic shelter, and a continuous
all-weather loop path. Long term improvements could include development of major new
facilities, and potentially adding additional amenities, such as outdoor fitness
equipment/parcourse or a full-size basketball court. None of these improvements would directly
impact the Good Shepherd Church (identified historic resource, see Table 3-4 Parks/Recreation
Facilities Containing or Adjacent to Historic Resources) adjacent to the park, and none of the
short-term improvements would indirectly adversely affect the character of the area, so would
also not impact a historic resource. Development of major facilities could have potential to affect
the area around the Good Shepherd Church (identified resource, see Table 3-4). The City would
design a major facility consistent with adopted policy regarding the protection of historic
resources and a separate CEQA document would be prepared which would analyze its effects
on historic resources.
As enhancement opportunities identified in Table 2-3 are developed into specific projects, the
City would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic
IS/MND or whether subsequent environmental review is required. Development of major
facilities as presented in Table 2-4 could have the potential to affect a historic resource. These
projects would be designed and developed consistent with adopted City policy regarding the
protection of cultural/historic resources (see Regulatory Setting) and would be analyzed in a
separate CEQA document once project plans are developed.
This IS/MND has considered known, listed, resources. However, any structure or significant
feature within the City park system that is approaching 50 years old or older which could be
impacted by a proposed improvement, would be considered under CEQA to have the potential
of being classified as a historic resource. Typical improvements which could directly impact
historic resources include, but are not limited to, renovating, expanding, or otherwise physically
altering an existing structure. Improvements which alter the existing character of a park or
recreation facility or include the development of major facilities could indirectly impact a historic
resource. Any project that could adversely change a historic resource would require a CEQA
document to analyze the project’s potential impacts prior to project approval.
By following local and state regulations and ordinances listed in Regulatory Setting, above, and
applying CRHR criteria to any structure that would be affected by the proposed Master Plan,
other unlisted resources eligible for listing would also be protected. Implementation of the
Master Plan would thus have a less than significant impact on historic resources.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Sub-surface archaeological resources are
generally found beneath modern topsoil layers and in undisturbed (native) soils. Although soils
within the City boundaries and any potential archaeological features have been disturbed by
historic farming operations as well as urban development, the Master Plan area could still
contain subsurface archaeological deposits, particularly in parks and open space areas that
have been subject to less intensive ground disturbance than more developed areas, especially
in parks near creeks. With the exception of Stevens Creek Corridor Park, there are no
documented prehistoric or historic archaeological resources in or near any of the existing City
parks and recreational facilities.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 115
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
As described in the environmental setting, Stevens Creek Corridor park contains a documented
Native American archaeological site as documented in CA-SLC-715 (P-43-000633). The Master
Plan lists the immediate completion of the Stevens Creek Corridor Park site master plan which
would include potential renovation or improvements to Stocklmeir Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf
Course, Blackberry Farm Park, and / or McClellan Ranch Preserve and West. The site-specific
master plan for the Stevens Creek Corridor Park would be developed consistent with all City
policies and regulations, including those focused on the protection of cultural and historic
resources and the site-specific master plan would be subject to a separate CEQA
determination.
In general terms, many of the improvements proposed by the Master Plan as presented in Table
2-2 Master Plan Goals, Table 2-3 Site Opportunities, and described in Section 2.7 would be
projects with minimal ground disturbing components and, thus, have a minimal chance for
uncovering unknown archaeological resources. However, any ground disturbing work has the
potential for archaeological discovery. New park and recreation facilities presented in Table 2-4
would have a greater likelihood of discovering unknown archaeological resources because the
extent of earthmoving activities is assumed to be relatively large. Once project-level information
is developed for improvements proposed to implement under the opportunities identified in the
Master Plan, the City would review the project under CEQA and determine the appropriate level
of environmental review. In the absence of conceptual-level design and implementation
information at this time, this IS/MND cannot evaluate the potential environmental impacts of
some of the actions contemplated in the Master Plan. Future review of these projects would
focus on site-specific environmental issues that could not be examined in sufficient detail as part
of this IS/MND.
Section 2.9 in Project Description identifies the design and construction measures the City of
Cupertino includes in Public Works contract documents, including General Conditions for
construction. In this document, Section 7.18 Historic or Archaeological Items identifies historic
and archaeological items requiring notification and stoppage of work upon discovery of any
potential historic or archeological items, including historic or prehistoric ruins, a burial ground,
archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints or other
archeological, paleontological or historical feature on the project site (collectively, “Historic or
Archeological Items”) during construction. The City would include this measure in all
construction contracts for park projects.
To safeguard potential archaeological resources from impacts during construction, the following
mitigation measure will be implemented for all park projects if unknown prehistoric or historic
cultural resources are discovered. Implementation of the mitigation would reduce potentially
significant impacts to less than significant levels.
Mitigation Measures:
Impact CULT-1: Park projects involving ground moving activity below the existing topsoil layer
may disturb unknown prehistoric or historic cultural resources during project construction.
Mitigation Measure CULT-1: Upon discovery of possible buried prehistoric or historic cultural
materials, work within 25 feet of the find must be halted and the City must be notified. The City
shall retain a qualified archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards to review and evaluate the find. Construction work shall not begin
again until the archaeological or cultural resources consultant has been allowed to examine the
cultural materials, assess their significance, and offer proposals for any additional exploratory
measures deemed necessary for the further evaluation of, and/or mitigation of adverse impacts
to, any potential prehistorical or historical resources or unique archaeological resources that
have been exposed.
If the discovery is determined to be a unique archaeological or historical resource, and if
avoidance of the resource is not possible, the archaeologist shall inform the City of the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 116
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
necessary plans for treatment of the find(s) and mitigation of impacts. The City shall insure that
the treatment program is completed. The work shall be performed by the archaeologist and shall
result in a detailed technical report that must be filed with the Northwest Information Center,
Sonoma State University. Construction in the immediate vicinity of the find must not
recommence until treatment has been completed.
Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.98 of the Public
Resources Code of the State of California, in the event of the discovery of human remains
during construction, there will be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains. The County Medical Examiner/Coroner
will be notified and will determine whether the remains are Native American. If the Coroner
determines the remains are Native American and are not subject to his or her authority, he or
she will notify the California Native American Heritage Commission, which will attempt to identify
descendants of the deceased Native American(s).
In anticipation of additional discoveries during construction, Archaeological Sensitivity Training
shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist for all personnel who will engage in ground
moving activities on the site prior to resuming construction.
If a newly discovered resource is, or is suspected to be, Native American in origin, the resource
shall be treated as a significant Tribal Cultural Resource, pursuant to Public Resource Code
21074, until the County has determined otherwise with the consultation of a qualified
archaeologist.
The City shall coordinate with the archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for
any resources that are discovered. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data
recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis. If appropriate, the archaeologist may introduce archaeological
monitoring on all or part of the site. An archaeological report shall be written detailing all
archaeological finds and submitted to the City and the Northwest Information Center.
The City shall ensure that appropriate construction conditions are included in any contract that
has the potential for ground disturbing operations. All excavation contracts for the project shall
contain provisions for stopping work in the vicinity of a find exposing archaeological resources
during subsurface construction.
Effectiveness: This measure would minimize and/or avoid impacts on undetected
archaeological and tribal resources.
Implementation: The City shall implement this measure in the event archaeological
resources are unearthed.
Timing: During all earth disturbing phases of project construction.
Monitoring: An archaeological report, if appropriate, will be written detailing all
archaeological finds and submitted to the City and the Northwest
Information Center.
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. There are no known cemeteries or burial
grounds that would be impacted by any project proposed under the Master Plan. The
boundaries of existing cemeteries are clearly defined and Master Plan projects would not disturb
ground within a cemetery or burial ground. The City would adhere to Section 7050.5 of the
Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.9 of the Public Resources Code (see above) as
Master Plan projects are implemented. This would ensure that impacts to human remains,
including Native American remains would be minimized in cases of unanticipated discovery.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 117
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.6 ENERGY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
3.6.1 Environmental Setting
Energy is primarily categorized in three areas: electricity, natural gas, and fuels used for
transportation. Energy consumption is closely tied to the issues of air quality and greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions, as the burning of fossil fuels and natural gas for energy has a negative
impact on both, and petroleum and natural gas currently supply most of the energy consumed in
California.
California is the most populous state in the U.S., representing 12 percent of the total population,
has the largest economy, and is second only to Texas in total energy consumption. However, in
general, California’s per capita energy consumption is relatively low. This is due to the state’s
mild climate, which reduces energy demand for heating and cooling, extensive efforts to
increase energy efficiency, and implementation of alternative technologies; California leads the
nation in electricity generation from solar, geothermal, and biomass resources.
According to the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report,
Californians consumed about 280,500 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity in 2014 and 13,240
million British thermal units (BTU) of natural gas in 2013. The CEC estimates that by 2025,
California’s electricity consumption will reach between 297,618 GWh and 322,266 GWh, an
annual average growth rate of 0.54 to 1.27 percent (CEC, 2015), and natural gas consumption
is expected to reach between 12,673 million and 13,731 million BTU by 2024, an average
annual growth rate of -0.4 to 0.33 percent (CEC 2015).
In 2017, total electricity use in Santa Clara County was approximately 17,189 million kilowatt
hours (kWh), including 13,139 million kWh of consumption for non-residential land uses (CEC,
2019a). Natural gas consumption was approximately 445 million therms in 2017, including 206
million therms from residential uses (CEC 2019b).
Energy conservation refers to efforts made to reduce energy consumption to preserve
resources for the future and reduce pollution. It may involve diversifying energy sources to
include renewable energy, such as solar power, wind power, wave power, geothermal power,
and tidal power, as well as the adoption of technologies that improve energy efficiency and
adoption of green building practices. Energy conservation can be achieved through increases in
efficiency in conjunction with decreased energy consumption and/or reduced consumption from
conventional energy sources.
3.6.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal and State Regulations
Since increased energy efficiency is so closely tied to the State’s efforts to reduce GHG
emissions and address global climate change, the regulations, policies, and action plans aimed
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 118
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
at reducing GHG emissions also promote increased energy efficiency and the transition to
renewable energy sources. The U.S. EPA and the State address climate change through
numerous pieces of legislation, regulations, planning, policy-making, education, and
implementation programs aimed at reducing energy consumption and the production of GHG.
As described in Chapter 2 the proposed Master Plan would not involve the development of
facilities that include energy intensive equipment or operations. While there are numerous
regulations that govern GHG emissions reductions through increased energy efficiency, the
following regulatory setting description focuses only on regulations that: 1) provide the
appropriate context for the proposed Master Plan’s potential energy usage; and 2) may directly
or indirectly govern or influence the amount of energy used to develop and operate Master Plan
projects. See the Environmental and Regulatory Setting discussion in Section 3.8, Greenhouse
Gas Emissions, for a description of the key regulations related to global climate change, energy
efficiency, and GHG emission reductions.
California Air Resources Board (CARB) Low Carbon Fuel Standard Regulation (LCFS)
CARB initially approved the LCFS regulation in 2009, identifying it as one of the nine discrete
early action measures in its original 2008 Scoping Plan to reduce California’s GHG emissions.
Originally, the LCFS regulation required at least a 10% percent reduction in the carbon intensity
of California’s transportation fuels by 2020 (compared to a 2010 baseline). On September 27,
2018, CARB approved changes to the LCFS regulation that require a 20% reduction in carbon
intensity by 2030. These regulatory changes exceed the assumption in CARB’s 2017 Climate
Change Scoping Plan, which targeted an 18% reduction in transportation fuel carbon intensity
by 2030 as one of the primary measures for achieving the state’s GHG 2030 target.
Local Regulations
Municipal Code
Chapter 16.58 of the Municipal Code, Green Building Standards Code, adopts the 2016
California Green Building Standards Code. The California Energy Commission (CEC) first
adopted Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings in 1978 in
response to a legislative mandate to reduce energy consumption in the State. Although not
originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, increased energy efficiency, and reduced
consumption of electricity, natural gas, and other fuels would result in fewer GHG emissions
from residential and nonresidential buildings subject to the standard. The standards are updated
periodically to allow for the consideration and inclusion of new energy efficiency technologies
and methods.
Part 11 of the Title 24 Building Standards Code is referred to as the California Green Building
Standards Code (CALGreen Code). The purpose of the CALGreen Code is to “improve public
health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings
through the use of building concepts having a positive environmental impact and encouraging
sustainable construction practices in the following categories: (1) planning and design; (2)
energy efficiency; (3) water efficiency and conservation; (4) material conservation and resource
efficiency; and (5) environmental air quality.” The CALGreen Code is not intended to substitute
or be identified as meeting the certification requirements of any green building program that is
not established and adopted by the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC).
CALGreen contains both mandatory and voluntary measures. For non-residential land uses
there are 39 mandatory measures including, but not limited to exterior light pollution reduction,
wastewater reduction by 20 percent, and commissioning of projects over 10,000 square feet.
Two tiers of voluntary measures apply to non-residential land uses, for a total of 36 additional
elective measures.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 119
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
General Plan
The Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element of the City’s General Plan includes
goals, policies, and strategies to help the City improve sustainability and the ecological health
and the quality of life for the community. The following goals, policies, and strategies from the
General Plan apply to the Master Plan:
• Goal ES-2. Promote conservation of energy resources
• Policy ES-2.1 Conservation and Efficient Use of Energy Resources. Encourage the
maximum feasible conservation and efficient use of electrical power and natural gas
resources for new and existing residences, businesses, industrial and public uses.
• Strategy ES-2.1.1 Coordination. Continue to evaluate, and revise as necessary,
applicable City plans, codes and procedures for inclusion of Federal, State, and regional
requirements and conservation targets.
• Strategy ES-2.1.2 Comprehensive Energy Management. Prepare and implement a
comprehensive energy management plan for all applicable municipal facilities and
equipment to achieve the energy goals established in the City’s Climate Action Plan.
Track the City’s energy use and report findings as part of the Climate Action Plan
reporting schedule. Embed this plan into the City’s Environmentally Preferable
Procurement Policy to ensure measures are achieved through all future procurement
and construction practices.
• Strategy ES-2.1.3 Energy Efficient Replacements. Continue to use life cycle cost
analysis to identify City assets for replacement with more energy efficient technology.
Utilize available tools to benchmark and showcase city energy efficiency achievements
(i.e. EPA Portfolio Manager, statewide Green Business Program).
• Strategy ES-2.1.6 Alternate Energy Sources. Promote and increase the use of alternate
and renewable energy resources for the entire community through effective policies,
programs and incentives.
• Strategy ES-2.1.7 Energy Co-generation Systems. Encourage the use of energy co-
generation systems through the provision of an awareness program targeting the larger
commercial and industrial users and public facilities.
• Strategy ES-2.1.8 Energy Audits and Financing. Continue to offer and leverage regional
partners’ programs to conduct energy audits and/or subvention programs for homes,
commercial, industrial and city facilities, and recommend improvements that lead to
energy and cost savings opportunities for participants and encourage adoption of
alternative energy technologies. Encourage energy audits to include emerging online
and application-based energy analytics and diagnostic tools. Share residential and
commercial energy efficiency and renewable energy financing tools through outreach
events and civic media assets.
• Goal ES-3. Improve building efficiency and energy conservation
• Policy ES-3.1 Green Building Design. Set standards for the design and construction of
energy and resource conserving/efficient building.
• Strategy ES-3.1.1 Green Building Program. Periodically review and revise the City’s
Green Building ordinance to ensure alignment with CALGreen requirements for all major
private and public projects that ensure reduction in energy and water use for new
development through site selection and building design.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 120
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
City of Cupertino Climate Action Plan
The Cupertino Climate Action Plan is a strategic planning document that identifies sources of
GHG emissions within the City’s boundaries, presents current and future emissions estimates,
identifies a GHG reduction target for future years, and presents strategic goals, measures, and
actions to reduce emissions from the energy, transportation and land use, water, solid waste,
and green infrastructure sectors (Cupertino 2015a). Chapter 4 of the City’s Climate Action Plan
defines actions and implementation steps that the City could take to reduce its own GHG
emissions, including:
•Goal 1: Improve Facilities – Transform facilities into models of technology demonstration
and conservation.
o Measure M-F-1: Sustainable Energy Portfolio. Procure low-carbon electricity through
utility-based programs or participation in a Community Choice Energy District.
o Measure M-F-2: Renewable/Low-Carbon Electricity Generation. Develop renewable
energy facilities at municipal buildings and facilities.
o Measure M-F-3: Advance Energy Management Activities. Reduce energy
consumption in existing municipal buildings through data analysis, interactive
management systems, employee education, and building operation and maintenance
policies.
o Measure M-F-5: Expand New Building Energy Performance. Establish energy
efficiency targets for new municipal buildings.
o Measure M-F-6: Complete Citywide Public Realm Lighting Efficiency. Upgrade public
realm lighting to more efficient technology.
o Measure M-F-7: Conserve Water Through Efficient Landscaping. Implement best
management practices in landscaping design and share City successes community-
wide to lead by example in water conservation action.
3.6.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a)Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
Less than Significant Impact. As described in Section 3.3.3, the potential park enhancements,
improvements, and other development actions identified in the Master Plan that are within the
scope of this IS (see Section 2.7.1) are small in size (i.e., potential projects do not have a large
footprint) and scale (i.e., potential projects do not involve substantial expansion of existing park
and recreational facilities or the development of significant new facilities) and are compatible
with the existing active and/or passive recreational nature of the specific park type where the
improvement would occur (e.g., community park, large neighborhood park, small neighborhood
park, etc.). Although these projects would not be large, the construction of Master Plan projects
would require the use of construction equipment and generate construction-related vehicle trips
that would combust fuel, primarily diesel and gasoline. The use of this fuel would be necessary
to complete the Master Plan project. In addition, as shown in Table 2-5, the City has included
BMPs to reduce fuel use in small equipment, idling, and waste hauling activities, ensuring fuel
would not be combusted in a wasteful or inefficient manner.
Certain new facilities such as new walkway lighting projects, new restrooms and other small
structures, and renovating, replacing, or repurposing existing park and recreation buildings
would consume electricity. In addition, a small, incremental increase in City fuel use may result
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 121
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
from maintenance activities at new, modified, or replacement park and recreation facilities.
Master Plan Objective 7.B focuses on sustainability issues and encourages green building
design, water efficient systems, and climate appropriate landscaping. Master Plan projects
would be subject to the City’s General Plan and Climate Action Plan policies pertaining to the
efficient use of energy. Furthermore, the energy used to construct Master Plan projects would
support non-vehicular travel within the City by providing an interconnected network of multi-use
trails, walkways and bikeways, close-to-home parks and other facilities that encourage biking
and walking to City park and recreation facilities (see Section 2.6.1, Objectives 2A to 2D and 3A
to 3C). Thus, the Master Plan is anticipated to reduce fuel use in the City over the long-term and
result in a net beneficial effect on energy consumption. For these reasons, the Master Plan
would not constitute a significant impact due to demand for fuel, electricity, or natural gas
energy resources and would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of these
resources.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
No Impact. The Master Plan would not conflict with or obstruct any state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency because the Master Plan would be implemented in
accordance with the City’s General Plan and Climate Action Plan policies pertaining to
renewable energy and energy efficiency, and the proposed facilities would not interfere with the
installation of any renewable energy system.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 122
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?
Note: Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in on-
or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks
to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
3.7.1 Environmental Setting
The following geology setting discussion is summarized from the General Plan, General Plan
EIR, and California Geological Survey (CGS) regulatory maps and seismic hazard reports.
Regional Geology
The City of Cupertino lies in the west-central part of the Santa Clara Valley, a broad, mostly flat
alluvial plain that extends southward from San Francisco Bay. Major faults lines occur on either
side of the valley, including the San Andreas Fault on the west and the Hayward and Calaveras
Faults on the east. The majority of the City is young, unconsolidated Quaternary alluvium from
the Holocene period. The very western part of the City is characterized by lower Pleistocene to
Upper Pliocene fluvial deposits of the Santa Clara Formations. The shallowest alluvium (and
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 123
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
youngest geologic deposits) in the City consist of unconsolidated sediment that is exposed
along the lower reaches of present-day drainages, such as Stevens, Regnart, and Calabazas
Creeks, as well as the flanking alluvium that reflects both recent and former stream courses.
These sediments have been described as Holocene-age younger alluvium and coarse-grained
alluvium that are composed of unconsolidated, poorly sorted gravel, silt, sand, and clay and
organic matter. More often than not, these sediments are encountered in active modern
drainage channels and small alluvial fans where they tend to grade into fine- to coarse-grained
alluvial deposits such as levees and fans.
Underlying the above-referenced younger alluvium is the Santa Clara Formation, a lower
Pleistocene to Upper Pliocene age assemblage of moderately to well-consolidated fluvial
deposits of pebble and cobble gravel with lesser amounts of sand, silt, and clay. Clay matrix in
this sedimentary bedrock is reported to be moderately expansive, and as a rule, the typical
permeability and porosity is low. The depositional material of the Santa Clara Formation is
thought to be composed of various non-marine environments that were formed in response to
late Cenozoic tectonism and uplift of the nearby Coast Ranges. The Santa Clara Formation is
believed to be as much as 500 feet thick in the Cupertino area, and it typically lies
unconformably on older Pliocene age rocks, often as a thin sedimentary veneer (City of
Cupertino 2014b).
Erosion
Within the City, sources of erosion include surface runoff and land disturbance or development.
City soils are generally not anticipated to have high erosion potential, but more substantive
erosion could occur along the City's creek banks, drainages, and other water courses.
Landslides
The City is mapped with landslide hazards in the south western portion of the City (Figure 3.7-1
Geologic Hazards). City and regional parks and open space resources within, or directly
adjacent to, landslide areas area includes: Deep Cliff Golf Course, Fremont Older Open Space
Preserve, Rancho San Antonio County Park, Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve,
Stevens Creek County Park, and Stevens Creek Corridor Park. W ith the exception of Stevens
Creek Corridor Park, none of the other parks or recreational resources are included in the
Master Plan. Other parks and recreational resources within the City are outside landslide hazard
zones and, therefore, are unlikely to be subject to significant land slippage (California
Department of Conservation 2002).
Subsidence
Subsidence occurs where water, gas, or other material is removed from intergranular spaces,
resulting in compaction of soils. In extreme circumstances, this phenomenon can cause severe
lowering of the soil surface, damaging overlying structures and causing risks to life. Subsidence
is most common in areas underlain by loose, compressible clay rich soils, where water or oil is
withdrawn in excessive amounts. Subsidence may also occur within landfill areas as the
underlying materials compact over time. The potential for subsidence in the Master Plan area is
not able to be generally estimated because City parks are spread over a wide area with varying
soil types.
City of Cupertino
Cupertino Sphere of Influence (SOI)
Cupertino Parks and Recreational Resources
Landslide Zone
Liquifaction Zone
Fault Zone
Alquist-Priolo Fault Trace
Alquist-Priolo Fault Leaderline
Pre-Quaternary Fault
Quaternary Faults
Concealed Fault
Certain Fault
Approximately Located FaultT:\CASE\Env\20288_01 Cupertino Parks Master Plan CEQA\GIS\MXDs\Geology_20190909.mxd 9/9/2019
Source: ESRI 2017; California Geological Survey 2002 & 2010; MIG 2018
City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Plan
0 1 20.5 Miles K
Figure 6.1-1 Geological Hazards
S
a
n
A
n
dre
a
s
F
a
ult
Cascade
F
a
ult
M
onte-Vista
F
ault
B
e
rrocal
F
a
ult
StanfordFault
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 125
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Seismicity
The City of Cupertino is in an area of high seismicity, with active faults associated with the San
Andreas Fault system. A map of the significant faults in the vicinity of Cupertino is shown
inFigure 3.7-1. The San Andreas Fault, one of the longest and most active faults in the world,
follows the ridge of the coastal mountains west of the City, and is approximately 1.8 miles south
west of the City at its closest point. Three additional faults closely associated with the San
Andreas fault, the Sargent-Berrocal, Monta Vista-Shannon, and Cascade fault systems, also
cross the portions of the City. Additionally, the Stanford fault is very close (approximately 0.2
miles) to the north eastern corner of the City. These additional faults are from the Quaternary
period (10,000 – 1.6 million years before present (BP)) and are generally considered inactive
(USGS 2019a). A further, unnamed, fault lies close to the south western corner of the City.
However, this fault is a pre-Quaternary age fault (Over 1.6 million years BP since last fault
activity) (California Department of Conservation 2010) and is considered inactive (DSOD 2001).
Significant earthquakes have occurred in the Bay Area and strong to violent ground-shaking in
the Master Plan area can be expected due to a future major earthquake on one of the active
faults in the region. Cupertino has a Modified Mercalli Shaking Severity level of 8 (Very Strong)
(USGS 2013). An event of sufficient magnitude could damage even strong, modern buildings in
the Master Plan area. Ground-shaking associated with an event along the San Andreas Fault
systems would have severe effects on the Master Plan area. The Working Group on California
Earthquake Probabilities has estimated that there is a 72 percent chance that a magnitude 6.7
or greater earthquake will occur in the San Francisco Bay Area within 30 years from 2014
(USGS 2015a, Field, E.H 2015). The probability of a 6.7 magnitude or greater earthquake
occurring along the San Andreas Fault was estimated to be 6.4 percent within 30 years from
2014 (USGS 2015b, Field, E.H 2015).
Ground Failure
Ground failure in the event of seismic activity may take the form of settlement, surface rupture,
liquefaction, or slope failure (landslides). Seismic settlement is the displacement of surface
geologic structures associated with a seismic event.
• Settlement: Settlement can cause unexpected changes in grade, interrupt utilities, and
damage structures. The potential for seismic settlement has not been mapped for the
Master Plan area.
• Surface Rupture: Rupture occurs when movement on a fault breaks through to the
surface. Areas overlying active faults are among those areas at risk of rupture during a
seismic event. The Berrocal fault and sections of the Monte-Vista fault system have
evidence of surface activity in portions of the City. The Cascade fault is a concealed fault
and has no surface evidence. All parks and recreational facilities are within one mile of
an active fault line, as shown in Figure 3.7-1.
• Liquefaction: Liquefaction is the condition by which saturated soils lose cohesion during
seismic events and settle, lose stability or amplify the effects of ground-shaking.
Liquefaction is most associated with alluvium and other young soil types with high sand
content. The liquefaction zone within the City and surrounding area is restricted to
canyon bottoms and borders of the larger creek channels (Figure 3.7-1). City park and
recreation resources that are in or near a liquefaction zone include; Stevens Creek
Corridor Park and Varian Park. Additionally, other City recreational resources span or
are adjacent to creeks that are mapped within a liquefaction zone. These include:
Creekside Park, Jollyman Park, Library Field, and Wilson Park.
• Slope failure: Slope failures, or landslides, may occur as a result of seismic activity.
Ground shaking from an earthquake may exacerbate existing slope instability. Additional
information on landslides and parks that may be affected by landslides is detailed above.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 126
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.7.2 Regulatory Setting
State Regulations
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act
The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act was passed in 1972 to mitigate the hazard of
surface faulting to structures for human occupancy. This state law was a direct result of the
1971 San Fernando Earthquake, which was associated with extensive surface fault ruptures
that damaged numerous homes, commercial buildings, and other structures. The law requires
the State Geologist establish regulatory zones (known as Earthquake Fault Zones 5) around
surface traces of active faults and issue appropriate maps accordingly. These maps are
distributed to all affected cities, counties, and state agencies for their use in planning and
controlling new or renewed construction. Local agencies must regulate most development
projects within the zones identified in the maps. There are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zones within the Master Plan area (California Department of Conservation 2002).
Seismic Hazard Mapping Act
The Seismic Hazard Mapping Act was passed in 1990 following the Loma Prieta earthquake to
reduce threats to public health and safety and to minimize property damage caused by
earthquakes. The act directs the U.S. Department of Conservation to identify and map areas
prone to the earthquake hazards of liquefaction, earthquake-induced landslides, and amplified
ground shaking. The Act requires site-specific geotechnical investigations to identify potential
seismic hazards and formulate mitigation measures prior to permitting most developments
designed for human occupancy within the Zones of Required Investigation.
California Building Code
The California Building Code (CBC) is codified in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) as
Title 24, Part 2 and became effective January 1, 2016. The CBC is administered by the
California Building Standards Commission but enforced by California cities and counties. The
purpose of the CBC is to establish minimum standards to safeguard the public health, safety,
and general welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials,
use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all building and structures and certain
equipment within its jurisdiction.
The CBC contains necessary California amendments, which are based on the American Society
of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Minimum Design Standards 7-10. ASCE 7-10 provides requirements
for general structural design and includes means for determining earthquake loads as well as
other loads for inclusion into building codes. The earthquake design requirements consider the
occupancy category of the structure, site class, soil classifications, and various seismic
coefficients, which are used to determine a seismic design category (SDC) for a project. The
SDC is a classification system that combines the occupancy categories with the level of
expected ground motions at the site; SDC values range from A (very small seismic vulnerability)
to E/F (very high seismic vulnerability and near a major fault). Once a project is categorized
according to SDC, design specifications can be determined. The provisions of the CBC apply to
the construction, alteration, movement, replacement, and demolition of every building or
structure, or any appurtenances connected or attached to such buildings or structures,
throughout California.
5 "Earthquake Fault Zones" were called "Special Studies Zones" prior to January 1, 1994.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 127
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Local Regulations
General Plan
The following policies from the Cupertino General Plan relate to Geology and Soils.
• Policy LU-12.1 Land Use Regulations. Establish and maintain building and development
standards for hillsides that ensure hillside protection.
• Strategy LU-12.1.1 Ordinance and Development Review. Through building regulations
and development review, limit development on ridgelines, hazardous geological areas
and steep slopes. Control colors and materials and minimize the illumination of outdoor
lighting. Reduce visible building mass with measures including, stepping structures down
the hillside, following natural contours, and limiting the height and mass of the wall plane
facing the valley floor.
• Policy LU-12.3 Rural Improvement Standards in Hillside Areas. Require rural
improvement standards in hillside areas to preserve the rural character of the hillsides.
Improvement standards should balance the need to furnish adequate utility and
emergency services against the need to protect the hillside, vegetation and animals.
• Strategy LU-12.3.1 Grading. Follow natural land contours and avoid mass of grading of
sites during construction, especially in flood hazard or geologically sensitive areas.
Grading hillside sites into large, flat areas shall be avoided.
• Policy HS-5.1 Seismic and Geologic Review Process. Evaluate new development
proposals within mapped potential hazard zones using a formal seismic/geologic review
process.
• Strategy HS-5.1.1 Geotechnical and Structural Analysis. Require any site with a slope
exceeding 10 percent to reference the Landslide Hazard Potential Zone maps of the
State of California for all required geotechnical and structural analysis.
• Strategy HS-5.1.3 Geologic Review. Continue to implement and update geologic review
procedures for Geologic Reports required by the Municipal Code through the
development review process.
• Policy HS-5.2: Public Education on Seismic Safety. Reinforce the existing public
education programs to help residents minimize hazards resulting from earthquakes.
Municipal Code
The Zoning Ordinance contained in the Municipal Code and similar tools provide specific
standards that regulate the development of land uses, structures, and infrastructure within the
community. These Codes and Ordinance are required to be consistent with the General Plan.
The City Municipal Code includes standards which address geology, soils, seismicity, and
associated hazards. Relevant chapters of the Municipal Code are summarized below:
16.08.120 Engineering Geological Reports. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Director,
after review by a civil engineer, may require an engineering geological investigation, based on
the most recent grading plan. The engineering geological report shall include an adequate
description of the geology of the site, and conclusions and recommendations regarding the
effect of geologic conditions on the proposed development. All reports shall be subject to
approval by the Director, and supplemental reports and data may be required as deemed
necessary. Recommendations included in the report and approved by the Director shall be
incorporated in the grading plan as needed for other purposes. The cost is to be borne by the
applicant.
16.08.130 Soils Engineering Reports. The Director may require after review by a civil engineer,
a soils engineering investigation, based on the most recent grading plan. Such reports shall
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 128
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
include data regarding the nature, distribution, erodibility of existing soil, strength of existing
soils with particular emphasis on stability of existing and proposed cut and fill slopes, data
regarding the nature, distribution and erodibility of soil to be placed on the site, if any,
conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures, and design criteria for corrective
measures. Recommendations included in the report and approved by the Director shall be
incorporated in the grading plan or specifications. The cost is to be borne by the applicant.
3.7.3 Discussion
The impact discussion presented below focuses on the Master Plan’s effect on geology and
soils. The Master Plan is evaluated to determine whether it would create or exacerbate soil or
geologic conditions identified in each of the significance threshold criteria below.
Would the proposed project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Less than Significant Impact. The City is not within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, and there are
no known Alquist-Priolo faults that cross the existing City park locations. However, three
fault/fault systems are known to exist within the City; the Berrocal, Monte Vista, and Cascade
fault systems. Of these, the Monte Vista fault is the most recently active, having last had activity
less than 15,000 years ago (USGS 2019b). The Berrocal and Cascade fault systems, have, in
comparison, had last known activity between 15,000 and 130,000 years ago. All three faults are
Quaternary period faults (10,000 – 1.6 million years BP), which generally means that they are
considered inactive. Because there are no faults considered to be active within the City, there is
a less than significant impact from exposing people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects from the rupture of a known earthquake fault.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less Than Significant Impact. The City is located in the San Francisco Bay Area which is
considered one of the most seismically active regions in the United States. Significant
earthquakes have occurred in this area and strong to violent ground-shaking in the City can be
expected due to a major earthquake along one of the faults in the region. The City would adhere
to policies related to protections extended to people and property from ground-shaking, such as
the CBC and City Municipal Code, as described above in the Regulatory Setting.
The proposed Master Plan would be unlikely to have an impact on or exacerbate existing
geological conditions relating to ground shaking. For most Master Plan projects, ground moving
activity is generally anticipated to be minimal and not have a significant impact under CEQA.
Activities listed in Table 2-3 would, in general terms, not have a significant effect under CEQA,
as long as relevant codes and regulations are implemented, such as preparation of a site-
specific geotechnical report and implementation of the CBC for the construction of structures.
Master Plan projects such as a new gymnasium facility, aquatic facility, performing arts center
or expansion of the Senior Center (see Table 2-4) could have the potential to exacerbate
existing geological conditions. The City would design and construct these projects consistent
with the requirements in Municipal Code Section 16.08.120 Engineering Geological Reports and
Section 16.08.130 Soils Engineering Reports, which would ensure the potential effects of
seismic ground shaking on park projects would be reduced to less than significant levels.
As a result, the adoption and implementation of the Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact related to seismic ground-shaking.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 129
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated sandy soils lose
strength and flow like a liquid during earthquake shaking. Ground settlement often accompanies
liquefaction. Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Varian Park are located in potential liquefaction
zones. Additionally, other parks and recreational facilities span or are adjacent to creeks that
are mapped within a liquefaction zone. These include: Creekside Park, Jollyman Park, Library
Field, and Wilson Park.
The proposed Master Plan would be unlikely to have an impact on or exacerbate existing
geological conditions relating to liquefaction. For most Master Plan projects ground moving
activity is generally anticipated to be minimal, would not exacerbate risks from liquefaction, and
would not have a significant impact under CEQA. Activities listed in Table 2-3 normally would
not have a significant effect on the environment as long as relevant codes and regulations, such
as implementation of the CBC for the construction of structures, such as restrooms, are
followed.
Master Plan projects (see Table 2-4) could have the potential to exacerbate existing geological
conditions. These include, but are not limited to, expansion of the senior center, or a new
gymnasium facility, performing arts center or aquatic facility. The City would design and
construct these projects consistent with the requirements in Municipal Code Section 16.08.120
Engineering Geological Reports and Section 16.08.130 Soils Engineering Reports, which would
ensure the potential effects of ground failure on park projects would be reduced to less than
significant levels.
As a result, the adoption and implementation of the Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact related to ground failure and liquefaction.
iv. Landslides?
Less Than Significant Impact. The existing City parks are generally flat or have minimal
slopes and are not susceptible to landslides. Only Stevens Creek Corridor Park is within a
landslide zone. Proposed activities at Stevens Creek Corridor Park include extensions of
bikeways and pedestrian paths, improvement of trailhead amenities, and the stabilization of the
creek bank of Stevens Creek. These proposed activities would be developed under a separate
site-specific master plan for the Stevens Creek Corridor Park which would undergo a separate
CEQA determination. The conceptual plans for Stevens Creek Corridor Park include bank
stabilization which would have a beneficial effect on reducing localized landslides from creek
bank failure.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less Than Significant Impact. Some activities envisioned in the Master Plan listed in Table 2-
3 in Project Description would include grading or new impervious surface area (e.g., extending
bicycle paths, creating play areas) that could result in soil disturbance, alter drainage patterns,
and/or cause erosion. The City would be subject to Waste Discharge Requirements (see
Hydrology Section) and would implement BMPs to protect water quality and prevent
sedimentation during specific project construction activities.
Master Plan projects could have the potential to exacerbate existing geological conditions.
These projects include, but are not limited to, expansion of the senior center, a new performing
arts center, gymnasium facility, or aquatic facility (see Table 2-4). The City would design and
construct these projects consistent with the requirements in Municipal Code Section 16.08.120
Engineering Geological Reports and Section 16.08.130 Soils Engineering Reports, which would
ensure the potential effects of soil erosion would be reduced to less than significant levels.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 130
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Once design and implementation information become available for specific projects, the City
would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND
or whether subsequent environmental review is required.
With inclusion of existing regulations and codes into project design and construction,
implementation of the Master Plan would have a less than significant impact on soil erosion and
loss of topsoil
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less Than Significant Impact. See response to question a) iv) for a response to impacts
related to landslides.
See response to question a) iii) for a response to impacts related to liquefaction or collapse.
As described above in the environmental setting, there are unstable soils underlying some parts
of the City. The majority of the projects proposed under the Master Plan would have little
physical impact or would occur in already developed areas, therefore, those projects would
have no impact to unstable geological units or soils. Structures identified by the proposed
Master Plan would be constructed in accordance with current CBC regulations. Pursuant to
Municipal Code requirements (Section 16.08.120 Engineering Geological Reports and Section
16.08.130 Soils Engineering Reports), any significant development would require a geotechnical
report with recommended mitigation or avoidance measures. By following existing codes and
regulations, impacts to unstable soils would be less than significant.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils contain shrink-swell clays that are capable of
absorbing water. As these clays absorb water, they increase in volume, and these changes in
volume are capable of exerting enough force on buildings and other structures to damage
foundations and basement walls. Damage from expansive soils also occurs when the soils dry
out and contract, causing subsidence and earth fissuring. No geotechnical report has been
prepared that covers all the City’s existing parks; therefore, it is not known whether there are
expansive soils underlying these parks. However, construction of structures identified by the
proposed Master Plan would be constructed in accordance with current CBC regulations, and
any significant development would require a geotechnical report with recommended mitigation
or avoidance measures (pursuant to Municipal Code requirements). By following existing codes
and regulations, impacts from expansive soils on park projects would be less than significant.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
No Impact. No alternative waste water disposal or septic tank systems are proposed as part of
the Park Master Plan.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA does not provide guidelines for what is considered to be
a unique geologic feature. However, no unusual geological features with potential for being
considered unique are identified in the City’s General Plan or General Plan EIR. The City’s
geological setting is not significantly distinct from surrounding cities, and none of the parks
within the Master Plan are known to contain unique geologic features.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 131
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The majority of the City of Cupertino is on recent alluvium deposits of the Holocene (11,700
years ago to present). Holocene deposits are too recent to contain fossils. The western edge of
Cupertino heading into the hills contains quaternary non-marine terrace and Plio-Pleistocene
non-marine deposits. These deposits date from the late Pleistocene (126,000 – 11,700 years
ago) and the Pliocene/Pleistocene boundary (around 2,588,000 years ago) (City of Cupertino
2014)
A review of the University of California’s Museum of Paleontology’s (UCMP) fossil locality
database was conducted for the entire City and Sphere of Influence (City of Cupertino 2014).
No paleontological resources have been identified within the current park locations; however,
the presence of Pleistocene deposits that are known to contain fossils indicates that the overall
park system sites could contain paleontological resources. Because most of the enhancement
opportunities contained in the Master Plan involve minor ground disturbance it is unlikely that
implementation of the Master Plan recommendations would result in impacts to paleontological
resources. Paleontological features are found in sedimentary bedrock. Most small-scale projects
or improvements proposed in the Master Plan are small projects for which excavation would not
extend beneath surficial soils, would not encounter a paleontological horizon and, therefore,
would not disturb paleontological resources. A list of minor projects is described in Section
2.7.1. Projects with the potential to impact environmental resources, primarily larger projects,
would undergo a separate CEQA process once design plans are available. These projects
would be evaluated for the potential to encounter bedrock and thus have a potential impact on
paleontological resources for which mitigation measures would be identified as necessary. The
City will design, construct, and manage park projects in conformance with adopted City policies
and standards and CEQA requirements. This process would ensure impact to paleontological
resources from park projects would be less than significant.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 132
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
3.8.1 Environmental Setting
Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere and affect regulation of the Earth’s temperature are
known as greenhouse gases (GHGs). GHGs that contribute to climate regulation are a different
type of pollutant than criteria air pollutants or hazardous air pollutants, because climate
regulation is global in scale, both in terms of causes and effects. Some GHGs are emitted to the
atmosphere naturally by biological and geological processes, such as evaporation (water
vapor), aerobic respiration (carbon dioxide), and off-gassing from low oxygen environments
including swamps or exposed permafrost (methane); however, GHG emissions from human
activities, such as fuel combustion (carbon dioxide) and refrigerants (hydrofluorocarbons), are
primarily responsible for the significant contribution to overall GHG concentrations in the
atmosphere, climate regulation, and global climate change.
At the state and regional level, transportation activities including motor vehicle trips are a
significant source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately 39.4% and 34.3% of the
most recent State, and San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin GHG emissions inventories,
respectively (BAAQMD 2015, CARB 2018a). The City of Cupertino completed a Climate Action
Plan in 2015. According to the City’s Climate Action Plan, community-wide emissions totaled
307,088 metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e). Like the state and regional GHG inventories,
the transportation sector accounted for nearly 33.8% of total Cupertino community-wide
emissions (Cupertino 2015a). Within the City, energy usage is the largest source of community
GHG emission (55.2%); the transportation sector is the second largest source of community-
wide GHG emissions. Municipal operations (e.g., City buildings, public lighting, use of City
vehicles, solid waste generated by City operations, and water use in City landscaping) emitted
1,775 MTCO2e in 2010, accounting for less than 1% of the total community-wide emissions.
The City’s CAP estimates that municipal and community-wide emissions would grow to
approximately 1,855 MTCO2e and 355,600 MTCO2e annually by 2020.
The City’s Climate Action Plan does not provide a specific estimate of GHG emissions from City
park and recreation facilities; however, the City’s existing park and recreation facilities generate
GHG emissions from the sources described in Section 3.3. Air Quality, as well as the following
GHG-specific sources:
• Energy use and consumption: In addition to natural gas usage, existing park and
recreation facilities generate indirect GHG emissions from electricity use in buildings
(e.g., lights, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, or HVAC, equipment). 100% of
City’s electricity consumption is provided from renewable energy sources through the
Silicon Valley Clean Energy’s Green Prime Program.
• Solid waste disposal: Emissions generated from the transport and disposal of waste
generated by park and recreation facilities.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 133
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Water/wastewater: Emissions from electricity used to supply water to land uses, and treat
the resulting wastewater generated.
3.8.2 Regulatory Setting
State Regulations
State of California Assembly Bill (AB ) 32 and Related Executive and Legislative Actions
In June 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger issued Executive Order S-3-05. This order
established the State’s GHG emission targets for 2010 (reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels),
2020 (reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels), and 2050 (reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent
below 1990 levels), created the Climate Action Team and directed the Secretary of the
California Environmental Protection Agency to coordinate efforts with meeting the GHG targets
with the heads of other state agencies.
In September 2006, Assembly Bill (AB) 32 was enacted, the California Climate Solutions Act of
2006. AB 32 establishes the caps on statewide GHG emissions proclaimed in Executive Order
S-3-05 and set December 31, 2020 as the date for achieving GHG reduction levels. In order to
effectively implement the emissions cap, AB 32 also directed CARB to establish a mandatory
reporting system to tract and monitoring GHG emissions from large stationary sources, prepare
a Scoping Plan demonstrating how the 2020 deadline can be met, and develop appropriate
regulations and programs to implement the plan by 2012.
In 2016 Senate Bill (SB) 32 and AB 197 were enacted. SB 32 made the GHG reduction target to
reduce GHG emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 a requirement, as opposed to
a goal. AB 197 gives the Legislature additional authority over CARB to ensure the most
successful strategies for lowering emissions are implemented, and requires CARB to, “protect
the state’s most impacted and disadvantaged communities …[and] consider the social costs of
the emissions of greenhouse gases.”
On September 10, 2018, Governor Edmund Brown issued EO-55-18, which directs the State to
achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible and no later than 2045 and achieve and maintain
net negative GHG emissions thereafter.
SB 375 Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act
SB 375 went into effect in January 2009. The objective of SB 375 is to better integrate regional
planning of transportation, land use, and housing to reduce sprawl and ultimately reduce GHG
emissions and other air pollutants. SB 375 tasks CARB with setting GHG reduction targets for
each of California’s 18 regional Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). In 2010, CARB
adopted GHG reduction targets for the San Francisco Bay region. The targets were set at7%
and 15% reduction in per capita passenger vehicle GHG reductions by 2020 and 2035,
respectively (compared to 2005). The regional strategy for achieving VMT goals mandated
under SB 375 is presented in Plan Bay Area 2040. In March 2018, CARB established new
regional GHG reduction targets for the San Francisco Bay region (CARB, 2018b). The new
targets are 10% reduction in per capita passenger vehicle GHG reductions by 2020 and a 19%
reduction by 2035 (compared to 2005).
CARB Scoping Plan
The CARB Scoping Plan is the State’s comprehensive plan for identifying how the State will
reach its GHG reduction targets established by AB 32 and SB 32. CARB has prepared several
iterations of the Scoping Plan with the most recent being prepared in 2017. CARB is required by
AB 32 to update the Scoping Plan every five years.
CARB’s current 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan has a primary objective of identifying the
measures needed to achieve the State’s GHG reduction target for 2030 (to reduce emissions by
40 percent below 1990 levels; CARB, 2017a). To achieve this GHG reduction target, the 2017
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 134
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Climate Change Scoping Plan includes a recommended plan-level efficiency threshold of six
metric tons or less per capita by 2030 and no more than two metric tons by 2050. The major
elements of the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan include, but are not limited to:
•Low Carbon Fuel Standard, with an increased stringency (18 percent by 2030);
•Implementation of SB 350, which expands the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to
50 percent and doubles energy efficiency savings by 2030;
•California Sustainable Freight Action Plan, which improves freight system efficiency,
utilizes near-zero emissions technology, and deployment of ZEV trucks;
•Continued implementation of SB 375;
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
As described in Section 3.3.2 Air Quality, the BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air Plan is a
comprehensive, multi-pollutant plan intended to reduce criteria air pollutant concentrations and
public exposure to Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs), as well reduce GHG emissions (BAAQMD
2017b). A key goal of the BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air Plan is to reduce Bay Area GHG
emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050,
consistent with GHG reduction targets adopted by the State.
Local Regulations
General Plan
The Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element of Cupertino’s General Plan includes
goals, policies and strategies to help the City improve sustainability and the ecological health
and the quality of life for the community. The following goals and policies of this Element apply
to the Master Plan:
•Goal ES-1. Ensure a sustainable future for the City of Cupertino.
•Policy ES-1.1 Principles of Sustainability. Incorporate the principles of sustainability into
Cupertino’s planning, infrastructure, and development process in order to achieve
improvement, reduce GHG emissions, and meet the needs of the community without
compromising the needs of future generations.
•Strategy ES-2.1.1 Climate Action Plan. Adopt, implement, and maintain a Climate Action
Plan to attain GHG emission targets consistent with state law and regional requirements.
•Goal ES-2. Promote conservation of energy resources.
•Policy ES-2.1 Conservation and Efficient Use of Energy Resources. Encourage the
maximum feasible conservation and efficient use of electrical power and natural gas
resources for new and existing residences, businesses, industrial, and public uses.
•Strategy ES-2.1.2 Comprehensive Energy Management. Prepare and implement a
comprehensive energy management plan for all applicable municipal facilities and
equipment to achieve the energy goals established in the City’s Climate Action Plan.
Track the City’s energy use and report findings as part of the Climate Action Plan
reporting schedule. Embed this plan into the City’s Environmentally Preferable
Procurement Policy to ensure measures are achieved through all future procurement
and construction practices.
•Strategy ES-2.1.3 Energy Efficient Replacements. Continue to use life cycle cost
analysis to identify City assets for replacement with more energy efficient technology.
Utilize available tools to benchmark and showcase City energy efficiency achievements
(i.e. EPA Portfolio Manager, statewide Green Business Program).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 135
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
•Goal ES-3. Improve building efficiency and energy conservation.
•Policy ES-3.1 Green Building Design. Set standards for the design and construction of
energy and resource conserving/efficient building.
•Strategy ES-3.1.1Green Building Program. Periodically review and revise the City’s
Green Building ordinance to ensure alignment with CALGreen requirements for all major
private and public projects that ensure reduction in energy and water use for new
development through site selection and building design.
Cupertino Climate Action Plan
The Cupertino Climate Action Plan (CAP) is a strategic planning document that identifies
sources of GHG emissions within the City’s boundaries, presents current and future emissions
estimates, identifies a GHG reduction target for future years, and presents strategic goals,
measures, and actions to reduce emissions from the energy, transportation and land use, water,
solid waste, and green infrastructure sectors (Cupertino 2015a).
The CAP uses 2010 as the GHG baseline emissions for the City and set community-wide
emissions reduction goals for 2020 (15 percent below 2010 baseline levels), 2035 (49 percent
below 2010 baseline levels), and 2050 (83 percent below baseline levels).
The City’s Climate Action Plan includes the following goals and measures related to
transportation and land use emissions:
•Goal 2: Encourage Alternative Transportation – Support transit, carpooling, walking, and
bicycling as viable transportation modes to decrease the number of single-occupancy
vehicle trips within the community.
o Measure C-T-1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Environment Enhancements. Continue to
encourage multi-modal transportation, including walking and biking, through safety
and comfort enhancements in the bicycle and pedestrian environment.
Chapter 4 of the City’s Climate Action Plan defines actions and implementation steps that the
City could specifically take to reduce its own GHG emissions, including:
•Goal 1: Improve Facilities – Transform facilities into models of technology demonstration
and conservation.
o Measure M-F-1: Sustainable Energy Portfolio. Procure low-carbon electricity through
utility-based programs or participation in a Community Choice Energy District.
o Measure M-F-2: Renewable/Low-Carbon Electricity Generation. Develop renewable
energy facilities at municipal buildings and facilities.
o Measure M-F-3: Advance Energy Management Activities. Reduce energy
consumption in existing municipal buildings through data analysis, interactive
management systems, employee education, and building operation and maintenance
policies.
o Measure M-F-5: Expand New Building Energy Performance. Establish energy
efficiency targets for new municipal buildings.
o Measure M-F-6: Complete Citywide Public Realm Lighting Efficiency. Upgrade public
realm lighting to more efficient technology.
o Measure M-F-7: Conserve Water Through Efficient Landscaping. Implement best
management practices in landscaping design and share City successes community-
wide to lead by example in water conservation action.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 136
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Goal 2: Convert Vehicle Fleet – Pursue employee commute and fleet alternatives to
encourage multi-modal mobility and support a broad shift toward alternative fuel
vehicles.
o Measure M-VF-1: Low emission and alternative fuel vehicles. Transition City vehicle
fleet to fuel-efficient and alternative-fuel vehicle models.
• Goal 3: Reduce Solid Waste – Effectively manage materials to shift behavior,
consumption, and life-cycle impacts.
o Measure M-SW -1: Waste Reduction. Reduce municipal waste through procurement
policies, waste diversion goals, and waste stream monitoring and analysis.
o Measure M-SW -3: Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion. Enhance
construction and demolition waste diversion rates for municipal projects.
Municipal Code
Chapter 16.72 of the City’s Municipal Code, Requirement for Construction and Demolition
Waste Recycling, is intended to ensure maximum diversion of construction and demolition
waste generated by new construction or remodeling projects within the City. Section 16.72.040
requires covered projects to recycle or divert at least sixty-five percent (65%), or meet the
amounts, criteria and requirements specified in the applicable California Green Building
Standards Code, whichever is more restrictive, of all materials generated for discard by the
project.
3.8.3 Discussion
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. As described in Section 3.3.3, the potential park
enhancements, improvements, and other development actions identified in the Master Plan that
are within the scope of this IS/MND (see Section 2.7) are small in size (i.e., potential projects do
not have a large footprint) and scale (i.e., potential projects do not involve substantial expansion
of existing park and recreational facilities or the development of significant new facilities) and
are compatible with the existing active and/or passive recreational nature of the specific park
type where the improvement would occur (e.g., community park, large neighborhood park, small
neighborhood park).
Although these projects would not be large, they would nonetheless generate GHG emissions
from the short-term construction and long-term operational activities described in Section 3.3.3,
discussion b), as well as the energy, solid waste, and water sources described in Section 3.8.1
above. The BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines contain screening criteria to provide lead
agencies with a conservative indication of whether a proposed project could result in potentially
significant GHG impacts (BAAQMD, 2017b). Consistent with the BAAQMD’s guidance, if a
project meets all the screening criteria, then the project would result in a less than significant
GHG impact (i.e., the project would not emit significant GHG emissions and a detailed GHG
assessment is not required for the project).One of the land use types presented for screening
analysis in the BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines is a “City Park” land use. The
operational screening size for a City Park land use is 600 acres.
The future development of potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development
actions identified in the Master Plan that are within the scope of this CEQA IS/MND would be
small in size and scale and would not exceed the BAAQMD’s screening size for City park land
uses. In addition, potential Master Plan projects would be subject to the City’s General Plan and
Climate Action Plan policies calling for reductions of GHG emissions from mobile, energy,
water, and other GHG emissions sources, and the Goal 7 of the Master Plan (Sustainability)
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 137
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
calls for the City to provide, manage, and maintain parks, facilities, programs, and services
through sound stewardship, sustainable choices, and wise use of resources. As the City plans
and designs park projects being carried out under the Master Plan, they would need to be
consistent with all City policies related to energy use presented in the Regulatory Setting
discussion presented above.
The City’s existing park and recreation facilities are subject to maintenance activities and
maintenance-related vehicle trips. Master Plan Objective 7.B acknowledges the importance of
designing and maintaining park facilities in an energy efficient manner and identifies a number
of actions that would reduce or limit energy consumption from new projects.
Although certain projects within the scope of this IS/MND may result in additional maintenance-
related trips (i.e., new infrastructure would require maintenance in addition to existing
infrastructure), the Master Plan focuses on serving the needs of the local community and is
likely to reduce overall visitor and maintenance VMT GHG-emissions by:
• Providing a connected and accessible network of parks for residents via paths, trails,
sidewalks;
• Improving access including for those with disabilities
• Creating additional parks and recreational spaces in areas that are currently
underserved (i.e. areas where residents have access to less than three acres of
developed park land in the City within a 10-minute walk)
The Master Plan projects within the scope of this IS/MND would not exceed the BAAQMD’s
screening size for City Park land uses (600 acres) and, given their size, scale, and general lack
of substantial emissions sources, would not generate GHG emissions that would have a direct
or indirect significant impact on the environment.
b) Conflict with an applicable, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
No Impact. The proposed Master Plan would not conflict with an applicable policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, including the BAAQMD Clean Air Plan, the
CARB 2017 Scoping Plan Update, or the City’s Climate Action Plan.
CARB Scoping Plan. As discussed under Section 3.8.2, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping
Plan is CARB’s primary document used to ensure State GHG reduction goals are met. The plan
identifies an increasing need for coordination among State, regional, and local governments to
achieve the GHG emissions reductions that can be gained from local land use planning and
decisions. The major elements of the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, which is designed to
achieve the State’s 2030 GHG reduction goal, are listed in Section 3.8.2. Nearly all of the
specific measures identified in the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan would be implemented at
the state level, with CARB and/or another state or regional agency having the primary
responsibility for achieving required GHG reductions. These include programs, like the State’s
Mobile Source Strategy, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, and Sustainable Freight Action Plan, which
would reduce tailpipe GHG emissions from construction equipment and vehicle trips associated
with the construction of potential BP Master Plan projects in addition to any reductions the City
achieves.
The proposed Master Plan, therefore, would not have the potential to directly conflict with any of
the specific measures identified in the City’s Climate Action Plan. Furthermore, as described
below, Master Plan projects would be implemented in accordance with the City’s Climate Action
Plan, which includes GHG reduction targets and measures commensurate with the 2017
Climate Change Scoping Plan’s goal to reduce GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by
2030. Therefore, the implementation of Master Plan projects consistent with the City’s Climate
Action Plan would ensure Master Plan projects do not conflict with state GHG reduction goals.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 138
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan. As discussed in Section 3.3, Air Quality, the proposed Master
Plan would support the primary goals of the BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air Plan (including GHG
reduction goals), include policies and implementing actions commensurate with the 2017 Clean
Air Plan’s control measures, and not disrupt, delay, or otherwise hinder the implementation of
any 2017 Clean Air Plan control measure. The Master Plan, therefore, would not conflict with
the BAAQMD’s 2017 Clean Air Plan. Furthermore, as described below, Master Plan projects
would be implemented in accordance with the City’s Climate Action Plan, which includes GHG
reduction targets and measures commensurate with the 2017 Clean Air Plan’s goal to reduce
GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. Therefore, the implementation of Master Plan
projects consistent with the City’s Climate Action Plan would ensure park projects do not conflict
with BAAQMD regional GHG reduction goals.
Cupertino Climate Action Plan
The Master Plan is a planning-level document that would not authorize or approve any specific
park improvement project that requires quantification and assessment of potential construction
or operational emissions. Furthermore, as described above under discussion a) as well as in
Section 3.3, discussion b), the size and scale of the potential park improvements are
substantially below the development intensity level (in acres) at which the BAAQMD has
determined a potential GHG impact may occur from a park project. Although each potential
Master Plan project would be different, the City would review each project for consistency with
its Climate Action Plan. Master Plan projects would primarily be subject to the City’s Climate
Action Plan local government control measures listed in Section 3.8.2. According to the City’s
2017 CAP Progress Report (City of Cupertino, 2017):
• 100% of municipal energy consumption comes from renewable energy sources that
generate little to no GHG emissions (e.g., solar, wind, geothermal, etc.)
• The City has reduced municipal building electric usage by 25% compared to 2010
baseline conditions.
• The City has reduced municipal natural gas usage by 20% compared to 2010 baseline
conditions.
The City’s Climate Action Plan’s GHG reduction targets are commensurate with the BAAQMD’s
2017 Clean Air Plan GHG reduction goals and the state’s GHG reduction goals upon which the
2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan was developed. Through 2015, the City had achieved a
13% reduction in GHG emissions, as compared to the Climate Action Plan’s 2010 baseline
year, and the City is on track to meet or exceed its Climate Action Plan GHG reduction goals,
making community-wide and municipal GHG emission reductions consistent with applicable
plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purposes of reducing GHG emissions (e.g., AB
32) (City of Cupertino, 2017).
The Master Plan’s overarching goals and objectives would support and are consistent with the
City’s Climate Action Plan GHG reduction strategy. Master Plan Goal 1 calls for the
conservation of natural areas and the protection of nature resources (Objective 1A). Master
Plan Goal 2 establishes a focus on connectivity and implementing recommendations for the
proposed trails and paths identified in the Bicycle Transportation Plan, Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, Cupertino General Plan, Countywide Trails Master Plan, and other local
and regional plans. This interconnected network of trails would improve access to parks and
expand walking and biking opportunities in Cupertino, thereby encouraging alternative modes of
transportation and a reduction in vehicle trips. Master Plan Goal 7 focuses on sound
stewardship, sustainable choices, and the wise use of resources related to renewable energy,
energy efficiency, water use for irrigation, and providing electric vehicle charging stations in
parking areas. For these reasons, the Master Plan would not conflict with the City’s Climate
Action Plan.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 139
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within 2 miles of a public airport or public use
airport, result in a safety hazard or excessive noise
for people residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
3.9.1 Environmental Setting
The Master Plan includes approximately 224 acres of park, trails, and sports fields at 32 sites
managed by the City. Hazardous materials refer to materials that exhibit corrosive, poisonous,
flammable, and/or reactive properties and have the potential to harm human health and/or the
environment. Hazardous materials are used in products (e.g., household cleaners, industrial
solvents, paint, pesticides) and in the manufacturing of products (e.g., electronics, newspapers,
plastic products). Hazardous materials can include petroleum, natural gas, synthetic gas,
acutely toxic chemicals, and other toxic chemicals that are used in agriculture, industrial uses,
businesses, hospitals, and households.
The term “hazardous materials,” as used in this chapter, includes all materials defined in the
H&SC: A material that, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical
characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to
the environment if released into the workplace or the environment. “Hazardous materials”
include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous waste, and any material that a
handler or the unified program agency has a reasonable basis for believing that it would be
injurious to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the
workplace or the environment.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 140
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Hazardous materials are commonly found throughout the Master Plan area in households,
businesses, and agricultural operations. Areas at a higher risk of a hazardous materials
discharge include those near major roadways used to transport hazardous materials, including
Highway 85 and Interstate 280. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) does not
restrict hazardous materials transport on either of these highways (National Hazardous
Materials Route Registry 2019). In general, risk of discharge from existing land uses is
considered low, because there are extremely limited manufacturing industries in the City
(Cupertino, 2019a). However, current and past uses of herbicides, pesticides, dry cleaning
chemicals, motor vehicle fuels, and other contaminants can lead to soil and groundwater
contamination. Older buildings could have asbestos-containing materials or lead based paint
present.
California Government Code Section 65962.5 requires CalEPA to compile, maintain, and
update specified lists of hazardous materials release sites in California. This list is commonly
referred to as the Cortese list. The CEQA Guidelines (California Public Resource Code Section
21092.6) require the lead agency to consult the lists compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 to determine whether a proposed project is listed on the California Department
of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor Database and the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) Geo Track databases. Both DTSC and SWRCB databases were
accessed on January 24, 2019 for listed contamination sites in the City of Cupertino. The
majority of Cortese list sites within the City are closed sites, meaning that they have met
cleanup criteria, with only ten SWRCB-identified sites with an open or active status, and only
three DTSC-identified sites identified as active at that time. The three DTSC sites are also
included on the SWRCB sites, thus totaling ten active or open sites. None of the parks or
recreational facilities within the Master Plan are included as active or open sites on the Cortese
list. Three of the active sites are within 1,000 feet (as measured on Google Earth from parcel
boundary to parcel boundary) of an existing park or recreational facility included on the Master
Plan. The active sites in proximity to a park/recreational facility are summarized in the table
below.
Table 3-5 Cortese Sites in Proximity of Parks and Recreational Facilities
Cortese
Site Name
Site Type Address Parks/Recreational
Facilities Within 1000
Feet
Distance from
Park/Recreational
Facility (Approx.)
Cupertino
Beacon
Leaking
Underground
Storage Tank
Cleanup Site
22510 Stevens
Creek Boulevard
Monta Vista Recreation
Center and Park
925 Feet
N/A (Private
Residence)
Cleanup
Program Site
11226 Bubb Road Regnart Elementary
School
650 Feet
Sedgwick
Elementary
School
School 10480 Finch
Avenue
Creekside Park 950 Feet
Hyde Middle School 500 Feet
Source: DTSC 2019a, DTSC 2019b SWRCB 2019, Google Earth 2019
The closest airport to the City is the San Jose International Airport, located approximately four
(4) miles to the northeast of the City. The Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission
(ALUC) has adopted a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for areas surrounding San Jose
International Airport. Cupertino is not within the CLUP (Santa Clara County, 2016). The City
also is not located within any protected airspace zones defined by the ALUC, including military
airports and airspace zones (Cupertino 2014).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 141
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City’s Emergency Plan was prepared in accordance with the National Incident Management
System (NIMS) and is used in conjunction with the State Emergency Plan, the Santa Clara
Operational Disaster Response and Recovery Area Interim Agreement, and the Santa Clara
County Emergency Plan.
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire) maps areas of significant
fire hazards in the state (CalFire 2012). These areas are identified based on weather, terrain,
fuels, and other factors. There is a small Very High Fire Severity Zone (VHFSZ) located at the
very southern edge of the city, in the vicinity of Upland Way, where the Fremont Older Open
Space Preserve crosses the boundary of the City (City of Cupertino 2014). A larger area High
Fire Severity Zone (HFSZ) exists in the sparsely populated western reaches of the city. A map
of the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Areas can be seen as Figure 3.20-1, in this IS/MND.
Based on identified Fire Hazard Severity Zones, none of the City’s existing parks or recreational
facilities are located in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Several parks/recreational
facilities included in the Master Plan are, however, located within a High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone. These include Little Rancho Park, Canyon Oak Park, Monta Vista Recreation Center &
Park, and Linda Vista Park.
There are three fire stations in the City, operated by the Santa Clara County Fire Department
(SCCFD), serving the City and nearby unincorporated areas (SCCFD 2019).
3.9.2 Regulatory Setting
Hazardous materials and wastes can pose a significant actual or potential hazard to human
health and the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or
otherwise managed. Many federal, State, and local programs that regulate the use, storage, and
disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous waste are in place to prevent these unwanted
consequences. These regulatory programs are designed to reduce the danger that hazardous
substances may pose to people and businesses under normal daily circumstances and as a
result of emergencies and disasters.
Federal Regulations
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
The EPA is the primary federal agency that regulates hazardous materials and waste. In
general, the EPA works to develop and enforce regulations that implement environmental laws
enacted by Congress. The agency is responsible for researching and setting national standards
for a variety of environmental programs. EPA programs promote handling hazardous wastes
safely, cleaning up contaminated land, and reducing waste volumes through such strategies as
recycling. California falls under the jurisdiction of EPA Region 9. Under the authority of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and in cooperation with State and tribal
partners, the EPA Region 9 Waste Management and Superfund Divisions manage programs for
site environmental assessment and cleanup, hazardous and solid waste management, and
underground storage tanks.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) oversees administration of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act, which requires: specific training for hazardous materials
handlers; provision of information to employees who may be exposed to hazardous materials;
and acquisition of material safety data sheets (MSDS) from materials manufacturers. Material
safety data sheets describe the risks, as well as proper handling and procedures, related to
particular hazardous materials. Employee training must include response and remediation
procedures for hazardous materials releases and exposures.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 142
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
The TSCA of 1976 provides EPA with authority to require reporting, record-keeping and testing
requirements, and restrictions relating to chemical substances and/or mixtures. Certain
substances are generally excluded from TSCA, including, among others, food, drugs, cosmetics
and pesticides. TSCA addresses the production, importation, use, and disposal of specific
chemicals including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), asbestos, radon and lead-based paint.
State Regulations
California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA)
CalEPA was created in 1991 by Governor Executive Order W-5-91. Several State regulatory
boards, departments, and offices were placed under the CalEPA umbrella to create a cabinet-
level voice for the protection of human health and the environment and to assure the
coordinated deployment of State resources. Among those responsible for hazardous materials
and waste management are DTSC, the Department of Pesticide Regulation, and the Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). CalEPA also oversees the unified
hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program (Unified Program),
which consolidates, coordinates, and makes consistent the following six programs:
• Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventories (Business Plans)
• Underground Storage Tank Program
• Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Act
• Hazardous Waste Generator and Onsite Hazardous Waste Treatment Programs
• California Uniform Fire Code: Hazardous Material Management Plans and Inventory
Statements
• California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP)
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
The California DTSC, which is a department of CalEPA, is authorized to carry out the federal
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous waste program in California to protect
people from exposure to hazardous wastes. The department regulates hazardous waste, cleans
up existing contamination, and seeks to control and reduce the hazardous waste produced in
California, primarily under the authority of RCRA and in accordance with the California
Hazardous Waste Control Law (California H&SC Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and the Hazardous
Waste Control Regulations (Title 22, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Divisions 4 and
4.5). Permitting, inspection, compliance, and corrective action programs ensure that people who
manage hazardous waste follow federal and State requirements and other laws that affect
hazardous waste specific to handling, storage, disposal, treatment, reduction, cleanup, and
emergency planning.
State Water Resources Control Board
The San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is authorized by the
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to enforce provisions of the Porter-Cologne
Water Quality Control Act of 1969. This act gives the San Francisco RWQCB authority to
require groundwater investigations when the quality of groundwater or surface waters of the
State is threatened and to require remediation actions, if necessary.
California Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Like OSHA at the federal level, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal
OSHA) is the responsible State-level agency for ensuring workplace safety. Cal OSHA assumes
primary responsibility for the adoption and enforcement of standards regarding workplace safety
and safety practices. In the event that a site is contaminated, a Site Safety Plan must be
prepared and implemented to protect the safety of workers. Site Safety Plans establish policies,
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 143
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
practices, and procedures to prevent the exposure of workers and members of the public to
hazardous materials originating from the contaminated site or building.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
CalFire has mapped fire threat potential throughout California. CalFire ranks fire threat based on
the availability of fuel and the likelihood of an area burning (based on topography, fire history,
and climate). The rankings include no fire threat and moderate, high, and very high fire threat.
CalFire published a 2010 Strategic Fire Plan for California that contains goals, objectives, and
policies to prepare for and mitigate the effects of fire on California’s natural and built
environments. CalFire’s Office of the State Fire Marshal provides oversight of enforcement of
the California Fire Code as well as overseeing hazardous liquid pipeline safety.
California Health and Safety Code
California Health & Safety Code Division 20, Chapter 6.95, and California Code of Regulations,
Title 19 of Section 2729, set out the minimum requirements for business emergency plans and
chemical inventory reporting. These regulations require businesses to provide emergency
response plans and procedures, training program information, and a hazardous material
chemical inventory disclosing hazardous materials stored, used, or handled on site. A business
which uses hazardous materials or a mixture containing hazardous materials must establish and
implement a business plan if the hazardous material is handled in certain quantities.
California Building Code
The State of California provides a minimum standard for building design through Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations (CCR), also known as the California Building Standards Code.
The 2016 California Building Code (CBC), is Part 2 of Title 24. The 2016 CBC is based on the
2015 International Building Code but has been modified for California conditions. It is generally
adopted on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, subject to further modification based on local
conditions. Commercial and residential buildings are plan-checked by local City and County
building officials for compliance with the CBC Typical fire safety requirements of the CBC
include the installation of sprinklers in all new high-rise buildings and residential buildings; the
establishment of fire resistance standards for fire doors, building material; and particular types
of construction.
California Fire Code
The California Fire Code (CFC) is Part 9 of Title 24of the CCR. The CFC is updated every three
years and includes provisions and standards for emergency planning and preparedness, fire
service features, fire protection systems, hazardous materials, fire flow requirements, fire
hydrant locations and distribution, and the clearance of debris and vegetation within a
prescribed distance from occupied structures in wildlife hazard areas. The Santa Clara County
Fire Department provides fire protection services for the City as well as for Campbell, Los Altos,
Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Saratoga, and other unincorporated areas. The Fire
Department implements and enforces the CFC in Cupertino.
Federal and State Hazardous Materials-Specific Programs and Regulations
Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) Regulations
State-level agencies, in conjunction with the federal EPA and OSHA, regulate removal,
abatement, and transport procedures for asbestos-containing materials (ACM). Releases of
asbestos from industrial, demolition, or construction activities are prohibited by these regulations
and medical evaluation and monitoring is required for employees performing activities that could
expose them to asbestos. Additionally, the regulations include warnings that must be heeded
and practices that must be followed to reduce the risk for asbestos emissions and exposure.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 144
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Finally, federal, State, and local agencies must be notified prior to the onset of demolition or
construction activities with the potential to release asbestos.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
The United States EPA prohibited the use of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the majority of
new electrical equipment starting in 1979 and initiated a phase-out for much of the existing
PCB-containing equipment. The inclusion of PCBs in electrical equipment and the handling of
those PCBs are regulated by the provisions of the Toxic Substances Control Act, United States
Code Title 15, Section 2601 et seq. Relevant regulations include labeling and periodic
inspection requirements for certain types of PCB-containing equipment and outline highly
specific safety procedures for their disposal. Likewise, the State of California regulates PCB-
laden electrical equipment and materials contaminated above a certain threshold as hazardous
waste. These regulations require that such materials be treated, transported, and disposed
accordingly. At lower concentrations for non-liquids, RWQCBs may exercise discretion over the
classification of such wastes.
Lead-Based Paint
Cal OSHA’s Lead in Construction standard is contained in Title 8 CCR, Section 1532.1. The
regulations address the following areas: permissible exposure limits (PELs); exposure
assessment; compliance methods; respiratory protection; protective clothing and equipment;
housekeeping; medical surveillance; medical removal protection (MRP); employee information,
training, and certification; signage; record keeping; monitoring; and agency notification. The
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Acts (CLPPA) of 1986 and 1989 with Subsequent
Legislative Revisions (California H&SC, Division 106, Sections 124125 to 124165) declared
childhood lead exposure as the most significant childhood environmental health problem in the
state. The CLPPA established the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program and
instructed it to continue to take steps necessary to reduce the incidence of childhood lead
exposure in California.
Regional Regulations
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
The Porter-Cologne W ater Quality Act established the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and divided the state into nine regional basins, each under the jurisdiction of a
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) is
the Regional Water Quality Control Board (San Francisco Bay RWQCB) that regulates water
quality in the Master Plan area. The San Francisco Bay RWQCB has the authority to require
groundwater investigations when the quality of groundwater or surface waters of the state is
threatened, and to require remediation actions, if necessary.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
The BAAQMD has primary responsibility for control of air pollution from sources other than
motor vehicles and consumer products (which are the responsibility of CalEPA and California
Air Resources Board (CARB)). The BAAQMD is responsible for preparing attainment plans for
non-attainment criteria pollutants, control of stationary air pollutant sources, and the issuance of
permits for activities including demolition and renovation activities affecting asbestos containing
materials.
Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (DEH)
The routine management of hazardous materials in California is administered under the Unified
Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Program (“Unified Program”), and
most of the City of Cupertino’s hazardous materials programs are administered and enforced
under the Unified Program. The Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (DEH)
Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (HMCD) is the Certified Unified Program Agency
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 145
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
(CUPA)for implementation and enforcement of hazardous material regulations under the Unified
Program. The HMCD also enforces additional hazardous materials storage requirements in
accordance with the Santa Clara County Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance and Toxic
Gas Ordinance. Under the authority of the RWQCB, the Santa Clara County DEH implements
the Local Oversight Program (LOP) to oversee the investigation and remediation of leaking
underground storage tanks (USTs) in Santa Clara County, including the City of Cupertino.
Businesses storing hazardous materials over threshold quantities are required to submit
Hazardous Materials Business Plans (HMBPs) to the HMCD. A HMBP must include measures
for safe storage, transportation, use, and handling of hazardous materials. A HMBP must also
include a contingency plan that describes the facility’s response procedures in the event of a
hazardous materials release.
Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD)
The SCCFD, through a formal agreement with the HMCD, implements hazardous materials
programs for the City of Cupertino as a Participating Agency within the Unified Program. The
HMCD also enforces storage, handling, and dispensing requirements for hazardous materials
and other regulated materials according to the City of Cupertino Hazardous Materials Storage
Ordinance.
Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management and Santa Clara County
Emergency Operation Plan
The Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) has adopted an Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP), which identifies hazards, incidents, events, and emergencies believed
to be important to the operational area. It is applicable to a wide variety of anticipated incident
events, including wildland fires. As part of the EOP, Fire agencies in the county have signed a
countywide mutual aid agreement to ensure firefighting resources and personnel will be
available to combat wildland / urban interface fires. If these resources within the county are not
enough to meet the threat, fire resources from throughout California can be summoned under
the State’s Master Mutual Aid Agreement administered by the Cal OES. All fire agencies in
Santa Clara County have signed the California Master Mutual Aid Agreement and participate in
mutual aid operations as required.
Local Regulations
General Plan
The Health and Safety Element, Chapter 7, of the General Plan contains goals and policies that
seek to reduce the risks associated with hazards in the community, including fire hazards,
hazardous materials, and hazardous wastes. Health and Safety Element policies that are
relevant to Master Plan-related hazards and hazardous materials are listed below.
• Policy HS-1.1: Regional Hazard Risk Reduction Planning. Coordinate with Santa Clara
County and local agencies to implement the Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation
Plan (LHMP) for Santa Clara County.
• Policy HS-2.1: Promote Emergency Preparedness. Distribute multi-hazard emergency
preparedness information for all threats identified in the emergency plan. Information will
be provided through Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), First Aid and Community
Emergency Response Team (CERT) training, lectures and seminars on emergency
preparedness, publication of monthly safety articles in the Cupertino Scene, posting of
information on the Emergency Preparedness website and coordination of video and
printed information at the library.
• Policy HS-2.1: Emergency Public Information. Maintain an Emergency Public
Information program to be used during emergency situations.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 146
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy HS-3.1: Regional Coordination. Coordinate wildland fire prevention efforts with
adjacent jurisdictions. Encourage the County and the Midpeninsula Regional Open
Space District to implement measures to reduce fire hazards, including putting into effect
the fire reduction policies of the County Public Safety Element, continuing efforts in fuel
management, and considering the use of “green” fire break uses for open space lands.
• Policy HS-3.2: Early Project Review. Involve the Fire Department in the early design
stage of all projects requiring public review to assure Fire Department input and
modifications as needed.
• Policy HS-3.3: Emergency Access. Ensure adequate emergency access is provided for
all new hillside development.
• Policy HS-3.6: Fire Prevention and Emergency Preparedness. Promote fire prevention
and emergency preparedness through city-initiated public education programs, the
government television channel, the Internet, and the Cupertino Scene.
• Policy HS-6.1: Hazardous Materials Storage and Disposal. Require the proper storage
and disposal of hazardous materials to prevent leakage, potential explosions, fire or the
release of harmful fumes. Maintain information channels to the residential and business
communities about the illegality and danger of dumping hazardous material and waste in
the storm drain system or in creeks.
• Policy HS-6.4: Educational Programs. Continue to encourage residents and businesses
to use non- and less hazardous products, especially less toxic pest control products, to
slow the generation of new reduce hazardous waste requiring disposal through the
county-wide program.
• Policy HS-6.5: Hazardous Waste Disposals. Continue to support and facilitate, for
residences and businesses, a convenient opportunity to properly dispose of hazardous
waste.
Municipal Code
Besides the General Plan, the Municipal Code is the primary tool that guides development in the
City. The City’s municipal code identifies land use categories, site development regulations, and
other general provisions that ensure consistency between the General Plan and proposed
development projects. The following chapters and sections of the Municipal Code would apply
to the proposed Project:
Chapter 9.12, Hazardous Materials Storage, in Title 9, Health and Sanitation, contains the
standards for the protection of health, life, resources, and property through prevention and
control of unauthorized discharges of hazardous materials in the City of Cupertino. The
Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance regulates the storage, handling, and dispensing
requirements for hazardous materials and other regulated materials in the City. Under Section
9.12.012, any person, firm or corporation which stores any material regulated by the City is
required to have a current Hazardous Materials Storage Permit.
Chapter 16.40, Fire Code, in Title 16, Buildings and Construction, contains regulations based on
the 2016 CFC, governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion.
Chapter 16.74 Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area Adopted, in Title 16, Buildings and
Construction, includes the City’s Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area map, which was adopted in
2009. This Map is located in Section 16.74.010.
City of Cupertino Emergency Operations Plan
State law requires cities to prepare an emergency plan in order to effectively respond to natural
or human-caused disasters that threaten lives, the natural environment or property. The
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 147
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Cupertino Emergency Operations Plan establishes an organizational framework to enable the
City to manage its emergency response activities and to coordinate with County, State and
Federal agencies. The Emergency Operations Plan was prepared in accordance with the
National Incident Management System (NIMS) and is used in conjunction with the State
Emergency Plan, the Santa Clara Operational Disaster Response and Recovery Area Interim
Agreement, Santa Clara County Emergency Plan, as well as plans and Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) of contract agencies and special districts. Support personnel such as City
staff, special districts and volunteer groups are trained to perform specific functions in the
Emergency Operations Center. The plan is reviewed annually and tested through periodic
emergency disaster drills.
3.9.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. (Response a-b).
The project is the implementation of a park and recreation facilities master plan, which does not
involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The project also does not
involve the use of hazardous materials in amounts that would pose a significant hazard to the
environment through foreseeable upset and release conditions. Only small amounts of fuels,
oils, lubricants, pesticides, paints, and cleaning agents are currently used within City facilities for
routine maintenance and this would not change as a result of the implementation of the Master
Plan. Therefore, the use of these materials does not present a significant hazard to the public.
Some park projects may require the demolition of existing buildings such as restrooms or
replacing, renovating, or repurposing buildings within the parks and recreation system. Older
buildings may contain either asbestos containing materials or lead based paint. As described in
the Regulatory Setting, state agencies, in conjunction with the federal EPA and OSHA, regulate
removal, abatement, and transport procedures for asbestos containing materials. Releases of
asbestos from industrial, demolition, or construction activities are prohibited by these
regulations. The disposal of materials containing lead-based paint is regulated by Cal OSHA.
All improvements related to implementation of the Master Plan would be designed to be
consistent with all applicable General Plan, Municipal Code, and Master Plan policies. In
addition, all Master Plan improvements would be subject to Cupertino’s construction standards
(see Project Description Section 2.9), including the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance
(Municipal Code chapter 9.12) and General Conditions of Cupertino’s Project Manual section
7.19 Recycling and Waste Disposal and 7.20 Stormwater Pollution Control (E)(2) Hazardous
Material/Waste Management and 10.2 Hazardous Material regarding removal, handling, or
disturbance of any asbestos or other Hazardous Materials, and the Public Works Construction
BMPs related to paint removal for lead based paint, and would be subject to federal, state and
local regulations, regarding the storage, handling, use, and disposal requirements for hazardous
materials.
Finally, adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the
construction of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and
implementation information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the
project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 148
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
subsequent environmental review is required. Therefore, the impact is considered less than
significant.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or hazardous waste within one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
Less than Significant Impact. A number of parks and recreational facilities are near or
immediately adjacent to one or more schools. The types of chemicals used in the parks for
routine maintenance would not pose a hazard to the school population because of the low level
of toxicity (vehicle fuels, fluids, fertilizers, paints, etc.) and because of the small quantities in
use. Implementation of the Master Plan would not affect existing materials handling and storage
practices, therefore there would be no change from existing conditions.
Existing policies and regulations contained in the General Plan and Municipal Code, as well as
applicable federal, state and local regulations, govern the storage, handling, dispensing, and
disposal requirements for hazardous materials within the City. By following existing regulations,
as well as the City’s standard design and construction measures discussed in Section 2.9 of the
Project Description, potential impacts from hazardous materials to schools would be at a less
than significant level.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. None of the existing City parks or facilities covered in the Master Plan are listed on
the Cortese List pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 by the Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC 2019a, 2019b).
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. Cupertino is not within two miles of a public airport or within any airport land use
plan defined by the Santa Clara County ALUC (Santa Clara County, 2016), and there are no
private airstrips or heliports listed by FAA in Cupertino (FAA 2019). Implementation of the
Master Plan would therefore not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the
project area.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. Adherence to City Policy HS-3.2 (Early Project Review) would require the SCCFD
to review all projects requiring public review in the early design stage to ensure that, among
other criteria, the proposed project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Implementation of
the Master Plan would not impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
Future projects implemented as part of the Master Plan would be designed to be consistent with
all applicable General Plan and Master Plan policies. Most Master Plan enhancement
opportunities are proposed for existing parks and would have little likelihood of causing
interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. Some Master
Plan opportunities include the acquisition of new park land or the development of new facilities
(see Table 2-4). While the Master Plan identifies specific types of park improvements
contemplated, it does not present project-level design plans for any specific improvement or
project. Once design and implementation information become available for specific projects, the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 149
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
City would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic
IS/MND or whether subsequent environmental review is required. Due to this, and by following
existing codes and regulations, there would be no impact to emergency plans.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of
loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
Less Than Significant Impact.
The environmental setting states that none of the City’s parks and recreation facilities are
located in a Very High Fire Severity Zone (VHFSZ). The four parks within a High Fire Severity
Zone (HFSZ) are at an elevated risk of wildland fires.
Two of the parks within a HFSZ (Little Rancho Park, and Canyon Oak Park) do not have any
improvements proposed under the Master Plan, and there would be no requirement for the
installation of associated infrastructure.
Because none of the City’s parks and recreation facilities is located in a VHFSZ, the project
would not change the existing conditions in a VHFHSZ and, therefore, would not exacerbate
wildfire risks and would not expose people or structures to significant risk from wildfire.
The other two parks in the HFHSZ (Monta Vista Recreation Center & Park, and Linda Vista
Park), have more substantial potential enhancement opportunities identified, such as the
renovation or replacement of the existing buildings at Monta Vista, and at Linda Vista Park the
addition of features such as a picnic shelter or pavilion, a destination nature play and/or water
play area, and potentially including adventure or challenge elements. These improvements
would necessitate separate CEQA documentation which would include a discussion of wildfire
risks.
Adoption of the Master Plan and implementation of its recommendations would not increase
existing fire hazard conditions or further expose park visitors to extreme fire hazard. Therefore,
implementation of the Master Plan would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 150
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface or groundwater quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-
or off-site;
ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site;
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
3.10.1 Environmental Setting
This analysis summarizes and draws from the environmental and regulatory setting information
for Hydrology and Water Quality chapter contained in the City’s General Plan EIR (2014) and
updated as appropriate.
Climate
The City is located within a Mediterranean-type climate zone, with almost all precipitation falling
between the months of October and May. Average rainfall is 15.93 inches. Temperatures tend
to be fairly mild with an average high of 71 degrees Fahrenheit and low of 50 degrees
Fahrenheit.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 151
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Hydrology and Surface Water Drainage
The City of Cupertino lies within the Lower Peninsula and West Valley Watersheds; which are
divided into smaller watersheds within the City’s boundaries: Permanente Creek, Stevens
Creek, Calabazas Creek, Saratoga Creek, Junipero Serra Channel, and Sunnyvale East
Channel watersheds. The watersheds eventually discharge into south San Francisco Bay
approximately 12 miles north and include the following waterways (see Figure 2-2):
• Permanente Creek
• Heney Creek
• Stevens Creek
• Regnart Creek
• Prospect Creek (primarily outside City limits)
• Calabazas Creek, and
• Saratoga Creek.
There are no other major surface water bodies within the City’s boundary; however, Stevens
Creek Reservoir managed by the Santa Clara Valley Water District is nearby and within the
City’s sphere of influence.
The City’s Department of Public Works manages the stormwater drainage system including
public streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and storm drains.
Groundwater
Cupertino is within the Santa Clara subbasin of the Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin. The
Santa Clara Subbasin extends from the southern edge of San Francisco Bay through the
Coyote Valley to approximately Cochrane Road in Morgan Hill. Groundwater movement
generally follows the surface water patterns flowing from the interior of the subbasin northerly
toward San Francisco Bay. Groundwater levels within Cupertino are generally 50 feet or more
below ground surface (bgs). The basin is divided into confined and recharge areas. Almost all of
the City of Cupertino is located within the Santa Clara subbasin recharge area. The City has
one recharge facility, the McClellan Road Ponds recharge facility which is owned and managed
by the Santa Clara Valley Water District. The creeks that flow through the City also provide
seepage and groundwater recharge.
Water Quality
Surface water quality is affected by point source and non-point source (NPS) pollutants. Point
source pollutants are emitted at a specific point, such as a pipe, while NPS pollutants are
generated by surface runoff from diffuse sources such as streets, paved areas, and landscape
areas. Point source pollutants are mainly controlled with pollutant discharge regulations
established by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB through National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System, or waste discharge requirements (see Regulatory section, below).
NPS pollutants are more difficult to monitor and control and are important contributors to
reductions in surface water quality in urban areas. Typical stormwater runoff pollutants include
oil, grease, and metals accumulated in streets, driveways, parking lots, and rooftops, as well as
pesticides, herbicides, particulate matter, nutrients, animal waste, and other substances from
landscaped areas. In general, pollutant concentrations in stormwater runoff do not vary
significantly within an urbanized watershed. However, pollutant concentrations do increase
when impervious cover is more than 40 to 50 percent of the drainage area. Runoff volume is the
most important variable in predicting pollutant loads.
Flooding
According to flood mapping prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
small portions of Cupertino are within the 100-year floodplain (designated as zone A and AE,
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 152
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
denoting a risk of flooding of 1 percent for any given year). The 100-year floodplain within the
City is confined to the areas immediately adjacent to creeks and streams. City parks in or
adjacent to these flood hazard areas include Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Varian Park,
Creekside Park, Wilson Park, Sterling Barnhart Park, and the Rancho Rinconada special district
facility (owned and managed by an independent park and recreation district) (General Plan EIR
Figure 4.8-4 FEMA Floodplains). The zone is shown crossing Jollyman Park; however, Regnart
Creek flows underground through a culvert at this location. The 100-year flood zone is a Special
Flood Hazard Area, which requires homeowners with mortgages to have flood insurance.
Most of the western and central portions of Cupertino are within the 500-year floodplain, which
is considered to be a low to moderate risk area for flooding.
Dam Failure Inundation
Dam failure is the uncontrolled release of impounded water behind a dam. Flooding,
earthquakes, blockages, landslides, lack of maintenance, improper operation, poor construction,
vandalism, and terrorism can all cause a dam to fail. The only dam with potential for failure
affecting the City of Cupertino is the Stevens Creek Dam. The Division of Safety of Dams
(DSOD) designated the dam as “high hazard” due to its location within a highly seismic
environment (Cupertino 2015b). Major modifications were made to the dam and appurtenant
structures in 1985 and 1986 to address seismic stability and spillway capacity. The dam
inundation zone extends along the Stevens Creek corridor, generally widening as the creek
reaches the City’s northern limits.
3.10.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal Regulations
Clean Water Act
Under the Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1977, the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) seeks to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the
nation’s waters. The statute employs a variety of regulatory and non-regulatory tools to reduce
direct pollutant discharges into waterways, finance municipal wastewater treatment facilities,
and manage polluted runoff. The CWA authorizes the USEPA to implement water quality
regulations. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program
under Section 402(p) of the CWA controls water pollution by regulating storm water discharges
into the waters of the United States (US). California has an approved state NPDES program.
The USEPA has delegated authority for water permitting to the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB), which has divided the state into nine regional basins, each under the
jurisdiction of a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
Section 303(d) of the CWA requires that each State identify water bodies or segments of water
bodies that are “impaired” (i.e. not meeting one or more of the water quality standards
established by the State). These waters are identified in the Section 303(d) list as waters that
are polluted and need further attention to support their beneficial uses. Once the water body or
segment is listed, the state is required to establish Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the
pollutant causing the conditions of impairment. TMDL is the maximum amount of a pollutant that
a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards.
The intent of the Section 303(d) list is to identify water bodies that require future development of
a TMDL to maintain water quality. In accordance with Section 303(d), the RWQCB has identified
impaired water bodies within its jurisdiction, and the pollutant or stressor responsible for
impairing the water quality.
Section 401 requires an applicant for any Federal permit that proposes an activity that may
result in a discharge to “waters of the U.S.” to obtain certification from the State that the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 153
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
discharge will comply with other provisions of the CWA. In California, a Water Quality
Certification is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board and/or RWQCB.
Section 404 authorizes the USACE to regulate the discharge of dredged or fill material to waters
of the U. S., including wetlands. The USACE issues individual site-specific or general
(Nationwide) permits for such discharges.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
FEMA administers the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which provides subsidized
flood insurance to communities that comply with FEMA regulations, which limit development in
flood plains. FEMA also issues Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) that identify which land
areas are subject to flooding. These maps provide flood information and identify flood hazard
zones in the community. The design standard for flood protection is established by FEMA, with
the minimum level of flood protection for new development set as the 100-year flood event, also
described as a flood that has a 1-in-100 chance of occurring in any given year.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
As previously discussed, the NPDES permit program was established by the CWA to regulate
municipal and industrial discharges to surface waters of the U.S. from their municipal separate
storm sewer systems (MS4s). Under the NPDES Program, all facilities which discharge
pollutants from any point source into waters of the U.S. are required to obtain an NPDES permit.
Point source discharges include discharges from publicly owned treatment works (POTWs),
discharges from industrial facilities, and discharges associated with urban runoff, such as storm
water. The NPDES permit programs in California are administered by the SWRCB and the nine
RWQCBs.
The SWRCB issued county-wide municipal stormwater permits in the early 1990s to operators
of MS4s serving populations over 100,000 (Phase 1). On November 19, 2015, the SWRCB re-
issued these county-wide municipal stormwater permits as one Municipal Regional Stormwater
NPDES Permit (Order No. R2-2015-0049) to regulate stormwater discharges from municipalities
and local agencies in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties, and the
cities of Fairfield, Suisun City, and Vallejo.
Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) for New Development and
Redevelopment allows the permittees to use their planning authorities to include appropriate
source control, site design, and storm water treatment measures in new development and
redevelopment projects to address both soluble and insoluble storm water runoff pollutant
discharges and prevent increases in runoff flows from new development and redevelopment
projects. The goal is to be accomplished primarily through the implementation of low impact
development (LID) techniques.
State Regulations
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act
The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act (Water Code Sections 1300 et seq.) is the basic water
quality control law in California. The Act established the SWRCB, (see also below) and divided
the state into nine regional basins, each under the jurisdiction of a RWQCB. The Act authorizes
the SWRCB and RWQCBs to issue and enforce Waste Discharge Requirements, NPDES
permits, Section 401 water quality certifications, or other approvals.
State Water Resources Control Board
The SWRCB is the primary State agency responsible for the protection of the state’s water
quality and groundwater supplies. Construction activities that disturb one or more acres of land
must comply with the requirements of the SWRCB Construction General Permit (2009-0009-
DWQ) as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ. Under the terms of the permit, applicants must file
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 154
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
permit registration documents with the SWRCB prior to the start of construction. The registration
documents include a Notice of Intent (NOI), risk assessment, site map, Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP), annual fee, and a signed certification statement.
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
The San Francisco Bay RWQCB is the regional authority responsible for planning, permitting
and enforcement of the CWA. Cupertino is within the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay
RWQCB (Region 2), which covers most of the Bay Area region, including Santa Clara County.
The San Francisco Bay RWQCB addresses region-wide water quality issues through the Water
Quality Control Plan for San Francisco Bay Region (Basin Plan), which is updated every 3
years. The Basin Plan was adopted in 1993 and updated most recently in May 2017. The Basin
Plan designates beneficial uses of the State waters within Region 2, describes the water quality
that must be maintained to support such uses, and provides programs, projects, and other
actions necessary to achieve the standards established in the Basin Plan.
California Fish and Game Code
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protects streams, water bodies, and
riparian corridors through the streambed alteration agreement process under Section 1600 to
1616 of the California Fish and Game Code. The California Fish and Game Code establishes
that “an entity may not divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed,
channel, or bank of any river, stream or lake, or deposit or dispose of debris, waste, or other
material containing crumbled, flaked, or ground pavement where it may pass into any river
stream, or lake (Fish and Game Code Section 1602(a)) without notifying the CDFW,
incorporating necessary mitigation and obtaining a streambed alteration agreement. The
CDFW’s jurisdiction extends from the top of banks and often includes the outer edge of riparian
vegetation canopy cover.
Emergency Services Act
The Emergency Services Act, under California Government Code Section 8589.5(b), calls for
public safety agencies whose jurisdiction contains populated areas below dams, to adopt
emergency procedures for the evacuation and control of these areas in the event of a partial or
total failure of the dam. The Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES), is responsible for
the coordination of overall state agency response to major disasters and assisting local
governments in their emergency preparedness, response, recovery, and hazard mitigation
efforts. In addition, the Cal OES Dam Safety Program provides assistance and guidance to local
jurisdictions on emergency planning for dam failure events and is also the designated repository
of dam failure inundation maps.
Regional Regulations
Santa Clara Valley Water District (now “Valley Water”)
Valley Water, previously known and referred to herein as Santa Clara Valley Water District
(SCVWD), is a water resources agency responsible for balancing flood protection needs with
the protection of natural watercourses and habitat in the Santa Clara Valley. Valley Water
serves 16 cities and 1.8 million residents, provides wholesale water supply, operates three
water treatment plants, and provides flood protection along the creeks and rivers within the
county. Valley Water implements the Clean, Safe Creeks and Natural Flood Protection (CSC)
Plan that created a countywide special parcel tax for flood protection, improved water quality
and safety, healthy creek and bay ecosystems and trails, parks and open space along
waterways.
In addition, Valley Water has developed the Water Supply and Infrastructure Master Plan, which
provides the strategy for meeting the County’s future water demands to the year 2035 with a
combination of reliable water supply sources and conservation programs. Groundwater in the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 155
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Santa Clara Basin is also managed by Valley Water through its 2016 Groundwater Management
Plan. Valley Water also prepares an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP, last updated in
2015) that provides information on water supply sources, historical water usage, water
conservation programs, demand projections, water shortage contingencies, and water quality.
Valley Water reviews plans for development projects near streams to ensure that the proposed
storm drain systems and wastewater disposal systems will not adversely impact water quality in
the streams. In addition, Valley Water reviews projects for conformance to Valley Water flood
control design criteria, stream maintenance and protection plans, and groundwater protection
programs.
Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) – The
SCVURPPP is an association of 13 cities and towns in the Santa Clara Valley, together with the
County of Santa Clara and Valley Water. The RWQCB has conveyed responsibility for
implementation of storm water regulations to the member agencies of SCVURPPP. The
SCVURPPP incorporates regulatory, monitoring, and outreach measures aimed at improving
the water quality of South San Francisco Bay and the streams of the Santa Clara Valley to
reduce pollution in urban runoff to the “maximum extent practicable.” The SCVURPPP
maintains compliance with the NPDES Permit and promotes storm water pollution prevention
within that context. Participating agencies (including the City of Cupertino) must meet the
provisions of the common permit by ensuring that new development and redevelopment
mitigate water quality impacts to storm water runoff both during the construction and operation
of projects.
Municipal Regional Storm Water NPDES Permit (MRP) - As stated above, pursuant to Section
402 of the CWA and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, municipal storm water
discharges in the City of Cupertino are subject to the W aste Discharge Requirements of the
MS4 Permit (Order Number R2-2009-0074) and NPDES Permit Number CAS612008, as
amended by Order Number R2-2011-0083. Provision C.3 of the MRP addresses post-
construction storm water management requirements for new development and redevelopment
projects that add and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious area. Provision C.3 of
the MRP also mandates that Cupertino require the incorporation of site design, source control,
and storm water treatment measures into development projects, minimize the discharge of
pollutants in storm water runoff and non-storm water discharge, and prevent increases in runoff
flows. LID methods are the mechanisms for implementing such controls.
Effective December 1, 2011, projects must treat 100 percent of the calculated runoff (based on
specific sizing criteria) with LID treatment measures that include harvesting and reuse,
infiltration, evapotranspiration, or biotreatment (biotreatment may only be used if the other
options are infeasible). In addition, projects that create and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more
of impervious surface for auto service facilities, retail gasoline outlets, restaurants, and/or
surface parking lots will also be required to provide LID treatment of storm water runoff.
In order to comply with Provision C.3 of the MRP, project sponsors are required to submit a
Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) with building plans, to be reviewed by the City of
Cupertino Public Works Department. The SWMP must be prepared under the direction of a
licensed and qualified professional.
Local Regulations
General Plan
The following are relevant goals and policies from the Environmental Resources and
Sustainability Element, Health and Safety Element, and Infrastructure Elements of the Cupertino
General Plan that are related to hydrology and water quality.
Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element
• Goal ES-7: Ensure protection and efficient use of all water resources.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 156
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy ES-7.1 Natural Water Bodies and Drainage Systems. In public and private
development, use Low Impact Development (LID) principles to manage stormwater by
mimicking natural hydrology, minimizing grading and protecting or restoring natural
drainage systems.
• Policy ES-7.2 Reduction of Impervious Surfaces. Minimize stormwater runoff and
erosion impacts resulting from development and use low impact development (LID)
designs to treat stormwater or recharge groundwater
• Policy ES-7.3 Pollution and Flow Impacts. Ensure that surface and groundwater quality
impacts are reduced through development review and voluntary efforts.
• Policy ES-7.8 Natural Water Courses. Retain and restore creek beds, riparian corridors,
watercourses and associated vegetation in their natural state to protect wildlife habitat
and recreation potential and assist in groundwater percolation. Encourage land
acquisition or dedication of such areas.
• Policy ES-7.11 Water Conservation and Demand Reduction Measures. Promote efficient
use of water throughout the City in order to meet State and regional water use reduction
targets.
Health and Safety Element
• Goal HS-7. Protect people and property from risks associated with floods.
• Policy HS-7.3 Existing Non-Residential Uses in the Flood Plain. Allow commercial and
recreational uses that are now exclusively within the flood plain to remain in their present
use or to be used for agriculture, provided it doesn’t conflict with Federal, State and
regional requirements.
• Policy HS-7.4 Construction in Flood Plains. Continue to implement land use, zoning and
building code regulations limiting new construction in the already urbanized flood hazard
areas recognized by the Federal Flood Insurance Administrator.
• Policy HS-7.5: Hillside Grading. Restrict the extent and timing of hillside grading
operations to April through October except as otherwise allowed by the City. Require
performance bonds during the remaining time to guarantee the repair of any erosion
damage. Require planting of graded slopes as soon as practical after grading is
complete.
Infrastructure Element
• Policy INF-4.1 Planning and Management. Create plans and operational policies to
develop and maintain an effective and efficient stormwater system.
Municipal Code
The City’s Municipal Code is another primary tool that guides development in the city. It
identifies land use categories, site development regulations, and other general provisions that
ensure consistency between the General Plan and proposed development projects. The
Municipal Code contains all ordinances for the City. The following chapters contain directives
pertaining to hydrology and water quality issues:
• Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection provides
regulations and legal effect to the MRP issued to the City and ensures ongoing
compliance with the most recent version of the NPDES permit regarding municipal
stormwater and urban runoff requirements. The code contains permit requirements for
construction projects and new development or redevelopment projects.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 157
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Chapter 9.19, Water Resources Protection requires property owners to obtain permits
for modification of property adjacent to a stream.
• Chapter 14.15, Landscape Ordinance, implements the California Water Conservation in
Landscaping Act of 2006 establishing new water-efficient landscaping and irrigation
requirements.
• Chapter 16.18, Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan requires implementation of
an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan calculating maximum runoff for the 10-
year storm event and measures to be undertaken to retain sediment on site, surface and
erosion control measures, and vegetative measures.
• Chapter 16.52, Prevention of Flood Damage, applies to all Special Flood Hazard Areas
within the City (i.e., subject to flooding during the 100-year storm). A development permit
must be obtained before new construction, substantial improvements, or development
begins in any are of special flood hazard. It also specifies construction standards that
must be implemented to protect buildings and improvements from flood damage.
3.10.3 Discussion
Implementation of Master Plan projects could result in hydrology and water quality impacts
during construction and operation of new facilities/amenities.
The Master Plan is consistent with the General Plan and includes Park Master Plan Goal 7B
which specifically addresses sustainable park design including consideration of permeable
surfacing on new trails and parking lots, water efficient and climate controlled irrigation systems
for new parks, recirculation or reuse of splash pad water, use of water efficient fixtures and
articulates the City’s intent to develop and implement the Master Plan in a sustainable manner
while protecting natural resources. Master Plan projects would be designed, constructed, and
maintained consistent with adopted City policy related to management of storm water runoff and
water quality objectives.
While the Master Plan identifies specific types of park improvements contemplated, it does not
present project level design plans for any specific improvement or project. In the absence of
project level information, this section identifies general areas of potential hydrology and water
quality resources impacts that could occur from the implementation of the Master Plan and
identifies how existing City policies, programs, and procedures would reduce or avoid
environmental impacts.
Adoption of the Master Plan would not approve the construction or implementation of any
projects or improvements identified in the Master Plan. As funding and designs become
available for specific projects, hydrology and water quality impacts related to master plan
improvements, would be evaluated based on project-specific conditions. A general discussion of
how construction-related and operational related activities associated with the implementation of
new projects in the future could impact hydrology and water quality follows.
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less than Significant Impact. The Master Plan opportunities referenced in Table 2-3 in the
Project Description with potential to result in environmental impacts are generally limited to
minor site disturbance, for example changes to park landscaping, trenching for utilities,
installation of shade structures or picnic tables, playground equipment, or additional
landscaping. These activities could potentially increase the amount of sediment runoff from the
site and flow into the City’s storm drains or natural drainage channels. Increased sediment could
negatively impact water quality of runoff flowing from the site. Objective 1D(v) of the Master
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 158
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Plan encourages embracing storm water management by incorporating green infrastructure
elements such as rain gardens, bioswales, permeable pavers, and detention pods to help
reduce flooding, filter pollutants, reduce stormwater runoff, and replenish groundwater.
Construction of park facilities could also involve the use of hazardous materials associated with
construction equipment (fuels, paints, thinners, and other chemicals or fluids), that are
potentially harmful to the environment in the event of an accidental spill or improper use or
handling.
Projects involving the disturbance of over one acre are subject to the requirements of the
SWRCB Construction General Permit. Additionally, the City requires stormwater pollution
prevention and watershed protection, stream resource protections, erosion and sediment
control, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 9.18, 9.19 and 16.18, as explained above in the
Regulatory Setting. Compliance with the regulatory and Municipal Code requirements protecting
surface and water quality ensure the project would not violate water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.
Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant.
Additionally, the City has developed standard measures or BMPs that are required to be
included in construction contracts that outline the City’s requirements for storm water runoff
management, compliance measures with municipal code requirements, storm drain protection
from road work, fresh concrete, and paints/solvents (see Section 2.9 in Project Description).
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
Less than Significant Impact. The Master Plan objectives and actions listed in Table 2-2 and
enhancement opportunities presented in Table 2-3 with potential to result in environmental
impacts are limited to minor site disturbance such as trenching for utilities, installation of shade
structures or picnic tables, playground equipment, additional bird, bee, or tree plantings, or
increasing habitat value through planting of new native landscaping and do not represent
activities that would significantly change the amount of impervious surfaces within parks. The
Master Plan includes Objective 7B which specifically addresses sustainable park design
including consideration of permeable surfacing on new trails and parking lots and, as explained
above, all new development is required to comply with the NPDES permit which requires
development projects over 5,000 square feet to treat 100 percent of the calculated runoff (based
on specific sizing criteria) with low impact development treatment measures that include
harvesting and reuse, infiltration, evapotranspiration, or biotreatment (biotreatment may only be
used if the other options are infeasible). These sustainable park design and low impact
development treatment measures encourage groundwater infiltration; therefore, the Master Plan
activities would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Mater Plan
would impede sustainable groundwater management.
Master Plan Objective 7B also promotes water efficient and climate-controlled irrigation systems
for new parks, recirculation or reuse of splash pad water, and use of water efficient fixtures. The
City’s Landscape Ordinance and Green Building Code also promote the efficient use of water
supplies. Therefore, the project would not substantially decrease water supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge and the impact is consisted less than significant.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site;
Less than Significant Impact. Compliance with existing regulations such as the Municipal
NPDES permit requirements, Municipal Code Chapters 9.18, 9.19, and 16.18, as described
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 159
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
above in the Regulatory Setting, and standard conditions are in place to prevent substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site from ground-disturbing Master Plan activities. Several parks
are immediately adjacent to creeks including Varian Park, Creekside Park, Wilson Park, and
Sterling Barnhart Park, Linda Vista and Civic Center/Library Field, and Stevens Creek Corridor
Park has Steven Creek traveling through it. Existing City parks are already developed, and
improvements identified in the Master Plan would not result in the alteration of the course of a
stream or river thus altering the existing drainage patterns. Therefore, the impact is considered
less than significant.
ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or off-site;
Less than Significant Impact. City projects, including Master Plan activities are subject to
compliance with the NPDES permit which requires the implementation of low impact
development measures that would limit the effects of new impermeable surfaces that could
potentially contribute to flooding on- or off-site. Master Plan Objective 1D, action iii, specifically
directs parks and trail corridors to be designed to “embrace stormwater management,
incorporating green infrastructure elements, such as rain gardens, bioswales, permeable
pavers, and detention ponds to help reduce flooding, filter pollutants and replenish
groundwater”. Thus, this impact is considered less than significant.
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff;
Less than Significant Impact. As stated in discussion c.ii) above, numerous regulations,
policies and standards are in place to ensure that any proposed new development in the City
does not increase the rate or amount of runoff into existing storm drain facilities. All new
impervious areas over 5,000 square feet are required to implement low impact development
measures and implement appropriately-sized stormwater treatment and capture to maintain
runoff flow rates and volume. The improvements covered by this IS/MND are limited to minor
site disturbance including trenching for utilities, installation of shade structures or picnic tables,
playground equipment, additional plantings, and increasing habitat value through planting of
new native landscaping, do not represent activities that would significantly change the amount
of impervious surfaces within parks. These activities are considered minor in nature and, when
considered with existing regulations in place by the City through General Plan policies, Master
Plan policies, Municipal Code requirements, and the municipal regional permit for Santa Clara
County (SCVURPP), the implementation of the Master Plan is not anticipated to result in
exceedance of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or substantial sources of
polluted runoff.
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
Less than Significant Impact. Municipal Code Chapter 16.52 Prevention of Flood Damage
applies to all Special Flood Hazard Areas within the city (i.e., areas subject to flooding during
the 100-year storm) and requires that a development permit must be obtained before new
construction, substantial improvements, or development begins in any area of special flood
hazard. It also specifies construction standards that must be implemented to protect buildings
and improvements from flood damage. This regulation ensures flood risks are not exacerbated
by new development.
The Master Plan does not specifically propose any new structures or facilities at Varian Park,
Creekside Park, Wilson Park, Sterling Barnhart Park, or Stevens Creek Corridor Park within
identified floodplains that would impede or redirect flood flows. The structures identified are
relatively small in nature, such as picnic tables, or shade structures and would not impede or
redirect flood flows in a manner that would affect adjacent properties. Once design and
implementation information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 160
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether
subsequent environmental review is required. Therefore, the impacts are considered less than
significant.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to
project inundation?
Less than Significant. As stated above, Municipal Code Chapter 16.52 addresses flood
hazards for new developments in identified flood zones and ensures facilities are designed
appropriately to address the hazard.
Tsunamis are a series of traveling ocean waves generated by a rare, catastrophic event
including earthquakes, submarine landslides and volcanic eruptions. The City is more than 12
miles away from the San Francisco Bay and is not located within a tsunami hazard zone.
A seiche is an oscillation wave generated in a closed or partially closed body of water which can
be compared to the back-and-forth sloshing in a bath tub. Seiches can be caused by winds,
changes in atmospheric pressure, underwater earthquakes, tsunamis or landslides into the
water body. Bodies of water such as bays, harbors, reservoirs, ponds and swimming pools can
experience seiche waves up to several feet in height during a strong earthquake. A seiche could
theoretically occur in the San Francisco Bay as a result of an earthquake or other disturbance,
but the threat of flooding would be no greater than the threat of tsunami inundation in a tsunami
inundation zone. The City is not located within a tsunami inundation zone and therefore is not
subject to seiche risk from San Francisco Bay waters.
The McClellan Ranch percolation ponds at McClellan Road/Bubb Road, and the Stevens Creek
Reservoir (both owned and operated by Valley Water), are in the City or the City’s sphere of
influence. No specific Master Plan improvements are identified for either the McClellan Ranch
percolation ponds or the Stevens Creek Reservoir areas, therefore the impact is considered
less than significant. Future plans at either area would need to consider seiche inundation
hazards in design planning. The project is the implementation of a park and recreation Master
Plan that does not involve use of materials that are considered hazardous pollutants or
materials in large amounts. Therefore, the risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation
is considered less than significant.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management plan?
Less than Significant Impact. Adoption and implementation of the Master Plan would not
conflict with the Basin Plan, the applicable water quality control plan for the region. As stated
above, ground disturbing activities are required to implement BMPs to control sediment and
erosion during construction and new development is required to implement low impact
development treatment measures to ensure stormwater leaving sites does not adversely affect
receiving waters. The City has measures and policies in place to limit impervious surfaces and
encourage stormwater retention and recharge. Park projects would not be a point source of
pollution regulated under the CWA or the Porter-Cologne Act. Park projects would not use
groundwater in large enough amounts to conflict with Valley Water groundwater management
plans. Therefore, the project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 161
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy,
or regulation adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
3.11.1 Environmental Setting
This analysis summarizes and draws from the environmental and regulatory setting information
for land use contained in the City’s General Plan Final EIR (2014b).
Cupertino is a 10.9 square mile city located on the southern portion of the San Francisco
Peninsula, in Santa Clara County. The cities of Los Altos and Sunnyvale border Cupertino on
the north, Santa Clara and San Jose borders Cupertino on the east, and Saratoga lies on its
southern border. Unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County form the southern and western
boundaries of the city.
Cupertino is a suburban community characterized by predominantly single-family residential
subdivisions with distinct commercial and employment centers. The land use patterns within the
City are influenced by the area’s agricultural origins (orchards were widespread in Cupertino
through World War II and up through the 1960s), the hilly terrain on the City’s western margins,
and the major roadways that extend through and around the city. In general, land use patterns
are more urban in character as one travels northeast through the City, with predominantly
larger-lot residential uses in the city’s western foothills transitioning to smaller-lot residential
uses interspersed with small commercial and industrial centers, schools, and other non-
residential uses. East of State Route 85, the land use pattern is even more urbanized, with
hotels and major commercial uses along major highways, and large corporate campus facilities.
The proposed project is the implementation of the City’s Parks and Recreation System Master
Plan. This environmental analysis covers proposed or potential Master Plan activities within the
City’s ownership or management responsibility. Therefore, Master Plan references to activities
occurring on non-City owned or operated properties is not covered (primarily on local school
sites). All City-owned park and recreational facilities are designated on the Land Use Map as
Parks and Open Space or Public Facilities, except for the Don Burnett Bridge Trail from Mary
Avenue to Homestead Road.
The City currently has about 3.7 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, when land publicly
accessible through agreements is counted (using U.S. Census Bureau data for the City’s July
2018 population estimate of 60,170 residents). The General Plan standard is a minimum of 3
acres per 1,000 residents. If the amount of land accessible due to an agreement with Cupertino
Union School District is excluded, the available park land is about 178 acres (or approximately
2.96 acres per 1,000 residents).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 162
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.11.2 Regulatory Setting
Land use regulations relevant to the impact analysis of each of the environmental disciplines in
the Environmental Checklist are presented and discussed in the specific impact analysis
section. For example, policies to protect environmentally sensitive habitats are listed in the
regulatory setting of Biological Resources section (Section 3.4.2 of this Environmental
Checklist), or visual resource policies in the Aesthetics Section 3.1.2). This setting discussion
focuses on land use-related plans and policies that relate to the Parks and Recreation System
Master Plan.
Federal and State Regulations
There are no federal or state land use regulations that apply to the project.
Local Regulations
General Plan
Chapter 3 of the City’s General Plan is the Land Use and Community Design Element. It
provides an overall policy context for future physical change in the City, including growth, and
helps define the desired balance among social, environmental, and economic considerations,
while enhancing the quality of life in the community. The intent of the element is to preserve and
enhance the distinct character of each planning area.
Relevant goals and policies of the General Plan include:
• Goal LU-3. Ensure that project site planning and building design enhance the public
realm through a high sense of identity and connectivity
• Policy LU-3.1 Site Planning. Ensure that project sites are planned appropriately to create
a network of connected internal streets that improve pedestrian and bicycle access,
provide public open space and building layouts that support City goals related to
streetscape character for various Planning Areas and corridors.
• Policy LU-3.2 Building Heights and Setback Ratios. Maximum heights and setback ratios
are specified in the Community Form Diagram (Figure LU-2). As indicated in the figure,
taller heights are focused on major corridors, gateways and nodes. Setback ratios are
established to ensure that the desired relationship of buildings to the street is achieved.
• Policy LU-3.3 Building Design. Ensure that building layouts and design are compatible
with the surrounding environment and enhance the streetscape and pedestrian activity.
• Policy LU-11.1Connectivity. Create pedestrian and bicycle access between new
developments and community facilities. Review existing neighborhood circulation to
improve safety and access for students to walk and bike to schools, parks, and
community facilities such as the library.
• Policy LU-27.4 Connections. Support pedestrian and bicycling improvements that
improve access with neighborhoods to parks, schools, and local retail, and between
neighborhoods. Support traffic calming measures rather than blocking the street to
reduce traffic impacts on neighborhoods.
• Policy LU-27.8 Protection. Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light,
glare, odors and visually intrusive effects from more intense development with landscape
buffers, site and building design, setbacks and other appropriate measures.
• Policy LU-27.9 Amenities and Services. Improve equitable distribution of community
amenities such as parks and access to shopping within walking and bicycling distance of
neighborhoods.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 163
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Goal RPC‐1: Create a full range of park and recreational resources and preserve natural
resources.
• Policy RPC-1.1 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Prepare a citywide Parks and
Recreation Plan that outlines policies to pan for the communities open space and
recreational needs. Specific strategies include preparation of separate master plans for
the Stevens Creek Corridor and the Civic Center.
• Policy RPC-1.2. Continue to implement a park land acquisition and implementation
program that provides a minimum of 3 acres per 1,000 residents.
• Goal RPC‐2. Distribute parks and open space throughout the community and provide
services, and safe and easy access, to all residents and workers
• Policy RPC-2.1 Park Land Acquisition. The City’s park land acquisition strategy should
be based upon three broad objectives:
• Distributing parks equitably throughout the City;
• Connecting and providing access by providing paths, improved pedestrian and
bike connectivity and signage; and
• Obtaining creek lands and restoring creeks and other natural open space areas,
including strips of land adjacent to creeks that may be utilized in creating buffer
areas, trails and trail amenities.
• Policy RPC-2.3 Park Land Distribution. Strive for an equitable distribution of parks and
recreational facilities throughout the City. Park acquisition should be based on the
following priority list. Accessibility to parks should be a component of the acquisition
plan.
• High Priority: Parks in neighborhoods or areas that have few or no park and
recreational areas.
• Medium Priority: Parks in neighborhoods that have other agency facilities such
as school fields and district facilities, but no City parks.
• Low Priority: Neighborhoods and areas that have park and recreational areas
which may be slightly less than the adopted City’s park land standard.
• Private Development: Consider pocket parks in new and renovated projects to
provide opportunities for publicly-accessible park areas.
• Policy RPC-2.4 Connectivity and Access. Ensure that each home is within a half-mile
walk of a neighborhood park or community park with neighborhood facilities; ensure that
walking and biking routes are reasonably free of physical barriers, including streets with
heavy traffic; provide pedestrian links between parks, wherever possible; and provide
adequate directional and site signage to identify public parks.
• Policy RPC-2.5 Range of Park Amenities. Provide parks and recreational facilities for a
variety of recreational activities. Strategy identified to address special needs groups
(such as seniors, disabled, or visually challenged individuals) by making improvements
to existing facilities and trails.
• Goal RPC‐3. Preserve and enhance access to parks that have significant natural
resources
• Policy RPC-3.1 Preservation of Natural Areas. Design parks to utilize natural features
and the topography of the site in order to protect natural features and keep maintenance
costs low. Strategies identified include maximizing native planting, restore and provide
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 164
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
access to creek and riparian habitat where possible, and to consider establishing Nature
Play Areas in lieu of more conventional play equipment.
• Goal RPC‐4. Integrate parks and public facilities within neighborhoods and areas
• Policy RPC-4.1 Recreational Intensity. Design parks appropriately to address the facility
and recreational programming required by each special area and neighborhood based
on current and future plans for the areas.
• Policy RPC-4.2 Park Safety. Design parks to enhance public safety by providing visibility
to the street and access for public safety responders.
• Goal RPC‐5: Create an interconnected system of multiuse trails and provide safe
pedestrian and bicycle access through the city and connections to local nodes and
destinations.
• Policy RPC-5.1 Open Space and Trail Linkages. Dedicate or acquire open space land
along creeks and utility through regional cooperation, grants and private development
review.
• Policy RPC-5.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths. Develop a citywide network of pedestrian
and bicycle pathways to connect employment centers, shopping areas and
neighborhoods to services including parks, schools, libraries and neighborhood centers.
• Goal RPC‐6: Create and maintain a broad range of recreation programs and services
that meet the needs of a diverse population.
Heart of the City Specific Plan
The Heart of the City Special Area is a key mixed-use, commercial corridor that encompasses
approximately 635 acres along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Highway 85 and the eastern
city limit. The Heart of the City Specific Plan guides development and redevelopment of the
Stevens Creek Boulevard corridor to implement the vision of “pedestrian‐inclusive gathering
places” to support a sense of place for Cupertino residents and visitors. According to the
Specific Plan, new development projects “should include pedestrian and bicycle pathways.”
Memorial Park, Quinlan Community Center, Cupertino Senior Center and Sports Center, and
Civic Center are within the Heart of the City Specific Plan area.
Municipal Code
Besides the General Plan, the Municipal Code is the primary tool that regulates development in
Cupertino. The Municipal Code contains all ordinances for the City and identifies land use
categories, site development regulations, and other general provisions that ensure consistency
between the General Plan and proposed development projects
Title 19 of the Municipal Code establishes the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance
describes the zoning designations and contains the zoning map and development standards for
the zoning designations. Zoning Ordinance Chapters 19.88 and 19.92 regulate Open Space and
Parks and Recreation zones, respectively.
Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan (2016)
Cupertino adopted a Bicycle Transportation Plan in 2016 to guide the development and
implementation of improving the City’s bicycling environment. The Plan included a needs
analysis, infrastructure recommendations, trail feasibility study, recommended programs, and
implementation strategy.
Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018)
The Cupertino adopted a Pedestrian Master Plan in 2018 to achieve its vision of an inviting,
safe and connected pedestrian network that enhances the quality of life for all community
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 165
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
members and visitors. The plan is a guiding framework for the development and maintenance of
pedestrian facilities throughout the City and recommend policies, programs, and messaging to
support and promote walking.
Cupertino ADA Transition Plan (2015)
In 2015, the City of Cupertino adopted an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self‐Evaluation
and Transition Plan in accordance with the requirements of the ADA for public entities. The ADA
Transition Plan reviews the programs, activities, and services provided by the City and identifies
and prioritizes removal of current barriers to accessibility.
The Transition Plan also includes a ten‐year plan for accessibility barrier removal (15‐year
schedule for barrier removal within the public rights‐of‐way). The Plan prioritizes the criteria for
barrier removal on public rights‐of‐way
3.11.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The proposed Master Plan contains recommendations for the City’s parks and
recreation system. One of the main goals of the Master Plan is to improve connectivity within
the City by enhancing bicycle and pedestrian access from neighborhoods to local parks.
Increased connectivity would be achieved by implementation of the City’s Bicycle Transportation
Plan and Pedestrian Transportation Plan, as well as the proposed Park and Recreation System
Master Plan. There are no recommendations in the Park and Recreation System Master Plan
that would physically divide an established community. Therefore, there would be no impact as
a result of physically dividing an established community.
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Less than Significant Impact. The Master Plan incorporates relevant data and policies from
several documents including the General Plan (2015b), the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2016),
the Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018) and the ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan
(2015) (Master Plan pg. 1). None of the Master Plan potential enhancement opportunities
(“project activities”) evaluated by this IS/MND with potential for environmental impacts would
cause a significant impact due to a conflict with any established land use plan policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of mitigating a significant environmental effect, because
project activities would occur at existing park and recreation facilities designated as park or
public facilities consistent with Cupertino land use and zoning designations, and would be
subject to the all the City’s adopted plans and policies. While the Master Plan identifies specific
types of park improvements contemplated, it does not present project-level design plans for any
specific improvement or project. Once design and implementation information become available
for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are covered
by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent environmental review is required.
Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 166
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local -general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
3.12.1 Environmental Setting
There are several mineral resource areas located in the City’s sphere of influence, but outside
the City limits. Two quarries, Lehigh Permanente and Stevens Creek, have been designated by
the State as having mineral deposits of regional or state significance. These quarries are
located in the unincorporated Santa Clara County outside City limits and, therefore, are within
the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County. Many areas within Cupertino’s City limits containing
mineral resources have already been developed into residential and other uses. A portion of
Linda Vista Park contains land that was part of the former McDonald-Dorsa quarry, which
closed in the early 1970s and is not a current source of minerals. Furthermore, the quarry was
closed before the enaction of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) in
1975.Therefore, any redevelopment in the area would need to address as needed any soil
stabilization and reclamation issues.
3.12.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal Regulations
Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA, Public Resources Code, Sections
2710-2796) provides a comprehensive surface mining and reclamation policy including the
regulation of surface mining operations to assure that adverse environmental impacts are
minimized and that mined lands are reclaimed to a usable condition. SMARA also encourages
the production, conservation, and protection of the state’s mineral resources. Public Resources
Code Section 2207 provides annual reporting requirements for all mines in the state, under
which the State Mining and Geology Board is also granted authority and obligations.
Local Regulations
General Plan
The following policies and strategies in Cupertino’s General plan address mineral resources in
the project area:
• Policy ES-6.1: Cooperatively work with Santa Clara County to ensure that plans for
restoration and mining operations at Lehigh Hanson and Stevens Creek quarries
consider environmental impacts and mitigations.
• Strategy ES-6.1.2: Consider designating abandoned quarries for passive recreation to
enhance plant and wildlife habitat and rehabilitate the land.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 167
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.12.3 Discussion
Would the proposed project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery
site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
No Impact. (Responses a-b). A portion of Linda Vista Park contains land that was part of the
McDonald-Dorsa quarry, which closed in the early 1970s and is not a current source of
minerals. No other City parks include known mineral resources. Therefore, adoption of the
Master Plan would not create any loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value to the
region and residents of the State, and the Master Plan would not result in any adverse impacts
to locally important mineral resources.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 168
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.13 NOISE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or in other applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
3.13.1 Environmental Setting
Noise may be defined as loud, unpleasant, or unwanted sound. The frequency (pitch),
amplitude (intensity or loudness), and duration of noise all contribute to the effect on a listener,
or receptor, and whether or not the receptor perceives the noise as objectionable, disturbing, or
annoying.
The Decibel Scale (dB)
The decibel scale (dB) is a unit of measurement that indicates the relative amplitude of a sound.
Sound levels in dB are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 dB represents a
tenfold increase in acoustic energy, while 20 dBs is 100 times more intense, 30 dBs is 1,000
more intense, and so on. In general, there is a relationship between the subjective noisiness, or
loudness of a sound, and its amplitude, or intensity, with each 10 dB increase in sound level
perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness.
Sound Characterization
There are several methods of characterizing sound. The most common method is the “A-
weighted sound level,” or dBA. This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to
which the human ear is most sensitive. Thus, most environmental measurements are reported
in dBA, meaning decibels on the A-scale.
Human hearing matches the logarithmic A-weighted scale, so that a sound of 60 dBA is
perceived as twice as loud as a sound of 50 dBA. In a quiet environment, an increase of 3 dB is
usually perceptible, however, in a complex noise environment such as along a busy street, a
noise increase of less than 3 dB is usually not perceptible, and an increase of 5 dB is usually
perceptible. Normal human speech is in the range from 50 to 65 dBA. Generally, as
environmental noise exceeds 50 dBA, it becomes intrusive and above 65 dBA noise becomes
excessive. Nighttime activities, including sleep, are more sensitive to noise and are considered
affected over a range of 40 to 55 dBA.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 169
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Sound levels are usually not steady and vary over time. Therefore, a method for describing
either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations over a
period of time is necessary. The continuous equivalent noise level (Leq) descriptor is used to
represent the average character of the sound over a period of time. The Leq represents the level
of steady-state noise that would have the same acoustical energy as the sum of the time-
varying noise measured over a given time period. Leq is useful for evaluating shorter time
periods over the course of a day. The most common Leq averaging period is hourly, but Leq can
describe any series of noise events over a given time period.
Variable noise levels are the values that are exceeded for a portion of the measured time
period. Thus, the L01, L05, L16.7, L25, L50, and L90 descriptors represent the sound levels exceeded
1%, 5%, 16.7%, 25%, 50%, and 90% of the time the measurement was performed. The L90
value usually corresponds to the background sound level at the measurement location.
When considering environmental noise, it is important to account for the different responses
people have to daytime and nighttime noise. In general, during the nighttime, background noise
levels are generally quieter than during the daytime but also more noticeable due to the fact that
household noise has decreased as people begin to retire and sleep. Accordingly, a variety of
methods for measuring noise have been developed. The California General Plan Guidelines for
Noise Elements identifies the following common metrics for measuring noise (Office of Planning
and Research, 2017):
• DNL (Day-Night Average Level): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level
during a 24-hour day, divided into a 15-hour daytime period (7 AM to 10 PM) and a
9-hour nighttime period (10 PM to 7 AM). A 10 dB “penalty” is added to measure
nighttime noise levels when calculating the 24-hour average noise level. For
example, a 45-dBA nighttime sound level (e.g., at 2 AM) would contribute as much to
the overall day-night average as a 55-dBA daytime sound level (e.g., at 7 AM).
• CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): The CNEL descriptor is similar to
DNL, except that it includes an additional 5 dBA penalty for noise events that occur
during the evening time period (7 PM to 10 PM). For example, a 45-dBA evening
sound level (e.g., at 8 PM) would contribute as much to the overall day-night average
as a 50-dBA daytime sound level (e.g. at 8 AM).
The artificial penalties imposed during DNL and CNEL calculations are intended to account for a
receptor’s increased sensitivity to noise levels during quieter nighttime periods. As such, the
DNL and CNEL metrics are usually applied when describing longer-term ambient noise levels
because they account for all noise sources over an extended period of time and account for the
heightened sensitivity of people to noise during the night. In contrast, the Leq metric is usually
applied to shorter reference periods where sensitivity is presumed to remain generally the
same.
Noise-Sensitive Receptors
Noise-sensitive receptors are buildings or areas where unwanted sound or increases in sound
may have an adverse effect on people or land uses. Residential areas, hospitals, schools, and
parks are examples of noise-sensitive receptors that could be sensitive to changes in existing
environmental noise levels. In general, the City’s parks are considered a noise-sensitive land
use. In addition, residences, schools, and other noise-sensitive land uses are generally located
adjacent or in close proximity to most of the City’s small neighborhood parks, large
neighborhood parks, school fields, and trails.
Existing Noise Setting and Ambient Noise Levels
The City’s noise environment consists of transportation and non-transportation related noise
sources.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 170
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The General Plan Health and Safety Element identifies traffic noise as the predominant noise
source in the City. Interstate 280 (I-280), Highway 85, and several major arterial roads such as,
but not limited to, Stevens Creek Boulevard, De Anza Boulevard, Homestead Road, and Foothill
Boulevard are all located within the City’s boundaries. Although the City receives some aircraft-
related noise from planes traveling to and from San Jose International Airport (approximately six
miles northwest of the city center) and other nearby airports, it is not located in a noise-impacted
area for any airport. Similarly, although the City contains one freight rail line (serving the Lehigh
Permanente Quarry), rail service is infrequent and is not a significant contributor to the City’s
transportation-related noise environment.
The General Plan Health and Safety Element identifies that non-transportation noise sources
may occur from all land use types. The City is mostly developed with residential, commercial,
mixed-use, institutional, and light industrial land uses that can generate noise from heating,
ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, loading docks, trash compactors, and
machinery.
The General Plan contains information on ambient noise levels throughout the City. Although
this information is approximately five years old, it is still considered to be a generally accurate
representation of the range of potential ambient noise levels throughout the City. The data
collected as part of the General Plan process indicated noise levels at short-term (15 minute)
measurement locations ranged from a minimum of 58.4 dBA Leq near Memorial Park to 67.3
dBA Leq near Jollyman Park to a maximum of 71.4 dBA Leq along South De Anza Boulevard.
The majority of the ambient noise levels measured throughout the City were between 65 and 70
dBA Leq, with the overall average for all measurements being 66.2 dBA Leq. Noise levels tended
to be higher adjacent to major roadways and freeways, where high volumes of traffic were the
dominant source of noise. Long-term measurements collected near Stevens Creek Boulevard in
2014 indicated noise exposure levels of approximately 69 to 72 DNL.
The Master Plan categorizes the City’s existing parks into six categories: community parks,
large neighborhood parks, small neighborhood parks, special use sites, trail corridors, and
school fields. These facilities, and their potential noise sources, are described below:
• Community Parks, including Memorial Park and Stevens Creek Corridor, are large
parks that serve multiple City neighborhoods. These parks are surrounded by a mix of
land uses that are primarily residential, commercial or institutional in nature. Noise
sources at community parks include human speech, crowd noise, whistles, mechanical
equipment, and noise from activities associated with the use of sport fields, community
centers, and/or recreation features.
• Large Neighborhood Parks such as, but not limited to, Creekside Park, Portal Park,
and Wilson Park, are approximately 4 to 13 acres in size and primarily serve the
neighborhood in which they are located, although they may contain one or more specific
features that draw residents from different neighborhoods. Typical amenities include play
equipment, turf, sport courts, benches, picnic tables, and landscaped areas. Noise
sources in neighborhood parks include speech, whistles, and other noise sources
associated with gatherings or groups of people for sports and recreation purposes.
• Small Neighborhood Parks such as, but not limited to, Franco Park and Somerset
Park, are approximately 0.3 to 3 acres and serve the local neighborhood surrounding the
park. Typical amenities include play equipment, benches, picnic tables, and landscaped
areas that produce noise, such as children’s play, conversations, and dogs barking.
• Special Use Sites such as, but not limited to, the Civic Center and Cupertino Sports
Center, are multi-use civic spaces for gathering and programming. Typical amenities
include interior and exterior civic space, community facilities (meeting halls, e.g.), dog
parks, or sports centers. These facilities produce noise from vehicle trips, crowds,
gatherings and groups of people engaged in sports and recreation activities and building
operations.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 171
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Trail Corridors such as, but not limited to, Don Burnett Bicycle Pedestrian Bridge and
Trail and Saratoga Creek Trail, provide local connectivity, park land access and riparian
corridor protection. In general, these facilities provide trails and paths for pedestrian and
bicycle travel and do not result in human congregation that generates noise in any
location for prolonged periods of time.
• School Fields (managed by the City) are sports fields and recreation facilities located at
elementary and middle schools that are available for community use when the fields are
not in use by the school. Noise sources from school field use include crowds, gatherings,
children playing on equipment, and groups of people engaged in sports, school, or field
recreation activities.
In general, most of the City’s existing park and recreation facilities are not located directly
adjacent to major roadways and other sources of loud noise. Exceptions to this include but are
not limited to Memorial Park (adjacent to Stevens Creek Boulevard), Franco Park (adjacent to
Homestead Road), and Jollyman Park (adjacent to Stelling Road). The City’s existing park and
recreation facilities, particularly the City’s small and large neighborhood parks (see Table 2-1)
that serve the local neighborhood and are usually surrounded by residential and other noise
sensitive land uses, contribute to local ambient noise levels. With regard to public facility noise,
the General Plan states that “outdoor activities that occur on school campuses and in parks
throughout the City generate noticeable levels of noise. Noise generated on both the weekdays
(from physical education classes and sports programs) and weekends (from use of the fields
and stadiums) can elevate community noise levels.” (Cupertino 2015a, Appendix D (Community
Noise Fundamentals, pg. D-11.)
Groundborne Vibration and Noise
Vibration is the movement of particles within a medium or object such as the ground or a
building. Vibration may be caused by natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions,
sea waves, landslides) or humans (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction
equipment). Vibration sources are usually characterized as continuous, such as factory
machinery, or transient, such as explosions.
As is the case with airborne sound, groundborne vibrations may be described by amplitude and
frequency; however, unlike airborne sound, there is no standard way of measuring and reporting
amplitude. Vibration amplitudes can be expressed in terms of velocity (inches per second) or
discussed in dB units in order to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration.
Vibration impacts to buildings are usually discussed in terms of peak particle velocity (PPV) in
inches per second (in/sec). PPV represents the maximum instantaneous positive or negative
peak of a vibration signal and is most appropriate for evaluating the potential for building
damage. Vibration can impact people, structures, and sensitive equipment. The primary concern
related to vibration and people is the potential to annoy those working and residing in the area.
Vibration with high enough amplitudes can damage structures (such as crack plaster or destroy
windows). Ground-borne vibration can also disrupt the use of sensitive medical and scientific
instruments, such as electron microscopes.
Groundborne noise is noise generated by vibrating building surfaces such as floors, walls, and
ceilings that radiate noise inside buildings subjected to an external source of vibration. The
vibration level, the acoustic radiation of the vibrating element, and the acoustical absorption of
the room are all factors that affect potential groundborne noise generation.
3.13.2 Regulatory Setting
State Regulations
California Department of Transportation
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 172
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The California Department of Transportation’ (Caltrans) Transportation and Construction
Vibration Guidance Manual provides a summary of vibration criteria that have been reported by
researchers, organizations, and governmental agencies (Caltrans, 2013a). Chapter six of this
manual provides Caltrans’ guidelines and thresholds for evaluation of potential vibration impacts
on buildings and humans from transportation and construction projects. These thresholds are
summarized in Table 3-6: Caltrans’ Vibration Threshold Criteria for Building Damage and Table
3-7: Caltrans’ Vibration Threshold Criteria for Human Response.
Table 3-6: Caltrans’ Vibration Threshold Criteria for Building Damage
Structural Integrity Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Transient Continuous
Historic and some older buildings 0.50 0.25
Older residential structures 0.50 0.30
New residential structures 1.00 0.50
Modern industrial and commercial structures 2.00 0.50
Source: Caltrans, 2013a
Table 3-7: Caltrans’ Vibration Threshold Criteria for Human Response
Human Response Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Transient Continuous
Barely perceptible 0.035 0.012
Distinctly perceptible 0.24 0.035
Strongly perceptible 0.90 0.10
Severely perceptible 2.00 0.40
Source: Caltrans,2013a
Local Regulations
General Plan
The Health and Safety Element of the City’s General Plan includes goals, policies, and
strategies to ensure that the community continues to enjoy a high quality of life through reduced
noise pollution, effective project design and noise management operations. The following goals,
policies, and strategies from the General Plan apply to the Master Plan:
• Goal HS-8. Minimize noise impacts on the community and maintain a compatible noise
environment for existing and future land use.
• Policy HS-8.1 Land Use Decision Evaluation. Use the Land Use Compatibility for
Community Noise Environments chart, the Future Noise Contour Map and the City
Municipal Code to evaluate land use decisions.
• Policy HS-8.2 Building and Site Design. Minimize noise impacts through appropriate
building and site design.
o Strategy HS-8.2.3 Sound Wall Requirements. Exercise discretion in requiring
sound walls to be sure that all other measures of noise control have been
explored and that the sound wall blends with the neighborhood. Sound walls
should be designed and landscaped to fit into the environment.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 173
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy HS-8.3 Construction and Maintenance Activities. Regulate construction and
maintenance activities. Establish and enforce reasonable allowable periods of the day,
during weekdays, weekends and holidays for construction activities. Require
construction contractors to use the best available technology to minimize excessive
noise and vibration from construction equipment such as pile drivers, jack hammers, and
vibratory rollers.
• Policy HS-8.5 Neighborhoods. Review residents’ needs for convenience and safety and
prioritize them over the convenient movement of commute or through traffic where
practical.
The City’s Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Chart referenced in
Policy HS-8.1 is reproduced below as Table 3-8: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise
Environments.
Table 3-8: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments
Land Use Category
Community Noise Equivalent Level (in dBA, CNEL)
Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally
Unacceptable
Clearly
Unacceptable
Residential – Low Density (Single Family,
Duplex, Mobile Homes) < 60 < 70 < 75 > 75
Residential – Multi Family < 65 < 70 < 75 > 75
Transient Lodging (Motels, Hotels) <65 < 70 < 80 > 80
Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals,
Nursing Homes < 70 < 70 < 80 > 80
Auditoriums, Concert Halls,
Amphitheaters -- < 70 -- > 70
Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports -- < 75 -- > 75
Playground, Neighborhood Parks < 70 -- < 75 > 75
Golf Course, Riding Stables, Water
Recreation, Cemeteries < 75 -- < 80 > 80
Office Buildings, Business Commercial
and Professional Centers < 70 < 77.5 > 77.5 --
Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities,
Agriculture < 75 < 80 > 80 --
Land Use Compatibility Interpretation:
Normally Acceptable:
Specific land use is satisfactory based upon the assumption that any buildings involved
are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation
requirements.
Conditionally Acceptable:
New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of
noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise reduction features included in
the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply
systems or air conditioning will normally suffice.
Normally Unacceptable:
New construction or development should be generally discouraged. If new construction
or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements
must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design.
Clearly Unacceptable: New development should generally not be undertaken.
Source: Cupertino 2015a
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 174
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Municipal Code
The City’s Municipal Code sets forth the following requirements specific to potential park and
recreation noise sources and Master Plan projects:
• Chapter 10.48, Community Noise Control
o Section 10.48.010, Definitions, defines “Noise disturbance” as any sound which:
1. Endangers or injures the safety or health of humans or animals; or
2. Annoys or disturbs a reasonable person of normal sensitivities; or
3. Endangers or damages personal or real property.
o Section 10.48.040, Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels, sets forth that
individual noise sources, or groups of noise sources, shall not produce a noise level
that exceeds the levels set forth in Table 3-9: Daytime and Nighttime Maximum
Noise Levels.
Table 3-9: Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels
Land Use at Point of Origin Maximum Noise Level
Daytime Nighttime
Residential 60 dBA 50 dBA
Nonresidential 65 dBA 55 dBA
Source: Section 10.48.040 of the City Municipal Code (City of Cupertino, 2019)
o Section 10.48.050, Brief Daytime Incidents, sets forth that during the daytime period
only, brief noise incidents exceeding the limits in Chapter 10.48 are allowed
providing that the sum of the noise duration in minutes plus the excess noise level
does not exceed twenty in a two-hour period, as shown in Table 3-10: Brief Daytime
Noise Incident Levels.
Table 3-10: Brief Daytime Noise Incident Levels
Noise Increment Above Normal
Standard Noise Duration in 2‐Hour Period
5 dBA 15 minutes
10 dBA 10 minutes
15 dBA 5 minutes
19 dBA 1 minute
Source: Section 10.48.050 of the City Municipal Code (City of Cupertino, 2019)
o Section 10.48.051, Landscape Maintenance Activities, sets forth that the use of
motorized equipment for landscape maintenance activities for public schools, public
and private golf courses, and public facilities is limited to the hours of 7 AM to 8 PM
on weekdays and 7 AM to 6 PM on weekends and holidays. The section also states
that the use of motorized equipment for landscape maintenance activities is exempt
from the noise limits set forth in Section 10.48.040 (see Table 3.13-4) provided
reasonable efforts are made by the user to minimize disturbances to nearby
residents by, for example, installation of appropriate mufflers or noise baffles,
running equipment only the minimal period necessary, and locating equipment so as
to generate minimum noise levels on adjoining properties.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 175
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
o Section 10.48.053, Grading, Construction, and Demolition sets forth standards for
construction-related noise:
1. Grading, construction and demolition activities shall be allowed to exceed the
noise limits of Section 10.48.040 (see Table 3.13-4) during daytime hours (7 AM
to 8 PM on weekdays and 9 AM to 6 PM on weekends) provided that the
equipment utilized has high-quality noise muffler and abatement devices installed
and in good condition, and the activity meets one of the following two criteria: 1)
No individual device produces a noise level more than 87 dBA at a distance of 25
feet; or 2) The noise level on any nearby property does not exceed 80 dBA.
2. Grading, street construction, demolition, and underground utility work are
prohibited within 750 feet of a residential area on weekends, holidays, and during
the nighttime period (8 PM to 7 AM on weekdays and 6 PM to 9 AM on
weekends). This restriction does not apply to emergency work activities as
defined by Section 10.48.030 of the Municipal Code.
3. Construction, other than street construction (and certain emergency work
activities), is prohibited on holidays.
4. Construction, other than street construction (and certain emergency work
activities) is prohibited during nighttime periods unless it meets the nighttime
standards in Section 10.48.040 (see Table 3.13-4).
• Chapter 13.04, Parks
o Section 13.04.190, Closing Hours – Prohibitions, states that no person shall
remain, stay, or loiter in any public park between the hours of 10 PM and 6 AM,
unless otherwise posted at the public park.
3.13.3 Discussion
The adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific park enhancement,
improvement, or other development action identified in the Master Plan because project-specific
engineering, design, and other information is not available. Because project-specific information
is not available at this time, potential noise and vibration impacts can only be evaluated at a
program level, based on the likely construction and operational activities associated with the
Master Plan projects. Once design and implementation information become available for
specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to determine whether its impacts are
covered by this programmatic IS/MND, or whether subsequent CEQA analysis is necessary.
In general, the potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development actions
identified in the Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS/MND (see Section 2.7) are small
in size (i.e., potential projects do not have a large footprint) and scale (i.e., potential projects do
not involve substantial expansion of existing park and recreational facilities or the development
of significant new facilities) and are compatible with the existing active and/or passive
recreational nature of the specific park type where the improvement would occur (e.g.,
community park, large neighborhood park, or small neighborhood park). The potential noise and
vibration impact of these projects are considered and evaluated below. Examples of the types of
potential noise-generating Master Plan projects include, but are not limited to (see “Site
Enhancement Opportunities” for large and small neighborhood parks Table 2-3):
• Temporary construction noise from equipment use, traffic, or construction activities .
during development and construction of future Master Plan projects.
• Permanent park and recreation noise from the following sources:
o Children’s play activities at playgrounds, nature play areas, water play areas, fields,
and recreation facilities.
o Passive recreation activities such as picnicking, wildlife viewing, or gardening (at
parks with community gardens).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 176
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
o Fitness activities such as walking, jogging, or biking (on park trails or pathways), or
use of fitness equipment and fitness stations.
o Sports activities such as but not limited to soccer, basketball, baseball, or ultimate
Frisbee at single- or multi-use sports fields and facilities.
o Dogs using dedicated dog parks, off-leash dog areas, or dog exercise spaces and
dogs on leash.
o On-site maintenance activities such as invasive species removal, bank stabilization,
and equipment and building repair activities (e.g., painting, replacing parts, etc.).
o Off-site vehicle trips on roads used to access City park and recreation facilities.
This IS/MND focuses on Master Plan goals, objectives, actions and enhancement opportunities
that have the potential to cause environmental impacts when implemented (see Table 2-2 and
Table 2-3). While the Master Plan identifies specific types of park improvements contemplated,
it does not present project-level design plans for any specific improvement or project. In the
absence of project-level information, this IS/MND identifies general areas of potential
environmental impacts that could occur from implementation of the Master Plan, and identifies
how existing City policies, programs, and procedures, as well as regulatory standards and
programmatic procedures, would reduce or avoid environmental impacts.
Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction
of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and implementation
information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to
determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent
environmental review is required.
Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, state, or
federal standards?
Less than Significant Impact. The future development of potential park enhancements,
improvements, and other development actions identified in the Master Plan would generate
noise from expanded, modified, or new recreational activities and operations that could exceed
City standards or result in a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise
levels. These issues are discussed below.
Temporary Construction Noise
The development of future park projects could require the use of heavy-duty construction
equipment that could temporarily increase noise levels at adjacent property lines near
construction areas. The type of equipment used could include small bulldozers, backhoes,
scrapers, compactors/rollers, cranes, pavers, material handlers/lifts, trucks and other
equipment. Since specific construction equipment information is not available at this time,
potential construction-related noise impacts can only be evaluated based on the typical
construction equipment noise levels. Table 3-11: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels
(dBA) presents the estimated, worst-case noise levels that could occur from operation of typical
construction equipment at distances of 25 feet, 50 feet, 100 feet, and 150 feet from the
equipment.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 177
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Table 3-11: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels (dBA)
Equipment
Reference Noise
Level at 25 Feet
(Lmax)
Percent
Usage
Factor(A)
Predicted Noise Levels (Leq) at
Distance(B)
25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet 150 Feet
Bulldozer 91 40 87 81 75 71
Backhoe 86 40 82 76 70 71
Compact Roller 86 20 79 73 67 63
Concrete Mixer 91 40 87 81 75 71
Excavator 91 40 85 81 75 71
Generator 88 50 88 79 73 69
Pneumatic tools 91 50 87 82 76 72
Scraper 91 40 87 81 75 71
Delivery Truck 91 40 79 81 75 71
Sources: Caltrans, 2013b and FHWA, 2010. (A) Lmax noise levels based on manufacturer’s specifications. (B) Usage factor refers to the amount of time the equipment produces noise over the time period. (C) Estimate does not account for any atmospheric or ground attenuation factors. Calculated noise levels based on
Caltrans, 2009: Leq (hourly) = Lmax at 25 feet – 20log (D/25) + 10log (UF), where: Lmax = reference Lmax from
manufacturer or other source; D = distance of interest; UF = usage fraction or fraction of time period of interest
equipment is in use.
Grading, construction, and demolition activities are exempt from the City’s noise standards
contained in Section 10.48.040 of the Municipal Code, provided the activities occur during
daytime hours (7 AM to 8 PM on weekdays and 9 AM to 6 PM on weekends) and one of the
following criteria is met:
• No individual device produces a noise level above 87 dBA at a distance of 25 feet; or
• The noise level on any nearby property does not exceed 80 dBA.
As shown in Table 3.11, typical construction equipment noise levels associated with the
operation of equipment such as a dozer, excavator, or scraper can exceed 87 dBA at a distance
of 25 feet under maximum load operations. When equipment operates under typical conditions
(a combination of low and high load operations), noise levels are predicted to be 87 dBA or
lower at a distance of 25 feet for all equipment (except generators), and less than 80 dBA at a
distance of 100 feet.
Most potential projects identified in the Master Plan would be minor in nature (e.g. improving
ADA accessibility, nature integration, pathways and seating improvements, etc.), short in
duration, and would generally not require substantial or prolonged heavy equipment operation in
close proximity to adjacent property lines (given that all but the smallest neighborhood parks are
several acres in size). It is likely that most, if not all, Master Plan-related projects would not
generate construction noise levels that exceed Municipal Code limits. Furthermore, park
projects would be subject to compliance with General Plan Policy HS-8.3, which requires
construction equipment to utilize the best available technology to minimize excessive noise and
vibration. As identified in Section 7.22 of the General Conditions of the City’s Public Works
contract documents, contractors are required to comply with all applicable noise control laws,
ordinances, regulations, and rules, including those identified in the City’s Municipal Code (see
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 178
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Section 2.9). The noise control requirements are applicable to all equipment used, regardless of
whether or not it is under the contractor’s ownership. For these reasons, potential construction
noise from Master Plan projects would not exceed the City’s Municipal Mode requirements and
are considered a less than significant impact.
Permanent Operational Noise
As described in Section 3.13.1 , the types of noises associated with the City’s existing park and
recreational facilities vary from location to location and are dependent on the types of amenities
present at the particular park and recreation facility. For example, the noises generated at a
small neighborhood park are different than those at a special use site because the small
neighborhood park has few or small scale developed activities. In general, larger park and
recreation facilities can accommodate a wider range of activities and a higher number of visitors
and groups and, therefore, have a higher potential for noise from sports fields, playgrounds, and
other recreational activities. Larger parks, however, also allow recreational activities to be
located farther away from nearby property lines. Although small neighborhood parks may
generate less noise, the noise source (playground, picnic areas, loud conversations, barking
dogs) is usually located closer to the surrounding community than sports fields located at large
community parks.
Most of the City’s neighborhood parks are located in residential neighborhoods. The noise
environments of the City’s residential neighborhoods vary depending on the development
density and proximity to a high-volume roadway; however, as described in Section 3.13.1 the
majority of the daytime ambient noise levels measured throughout the City were between 65
and 70 dBA Leq. These short-term noise levels generally fall within the conditionally acceptable
noise exposure level (70 dBA CNEL) established by the General Plan for low-density
residential, multi-family residential, and commercial land uses that may be adjacent to existing
parks.
In general, the potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development actions
identified in the Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS/MND would have little to no
potential to generate noise levels that exceed the limits in Municipal Code Sections 10.48.040
and 10.48.050 (see Tables 3-9 and 3-10), or appreciably change the 24-hour CNEL in an
adjacent neighborhood. The typical noises emanating from the City’s existing parks include:
• Human voices from conversation, picnicking, celebrations, recorded music, etc.
• Children laughing and shouting
• Whistles, cheering, and other noises associated with organized and unorganized sports
activities
• Dogs barking
• Equipment operations such as mowers, building equipment, etc.
• Vehicle trips to, from, and within parks
These noise sources are generally not substantial, nor prolonged, and are part of usual park
environments. Most of the Master Plan projects would improve the existing infrastructure at
parks and, therefore, would support existing recreation activities (e.g. improving ADA
accessibility, nature integration, pathways and seating improvements, etc.). Accordingly,
projects that improve walking paths or trail connections, replace play equipment or other
structures, and add wayfinding signage would not change the overall existing noise environment
at a park because they do not substantially change the recreational amenities available at the
park, substantially change the capacity of the park to accommodate visitors, or add a new
source of noise to the park. Thus, Master Plan projects that make minor improvements to
existing facilities would not result in significant changes to existing noise levels.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 179
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Some of the park projects that are within the scope of this IS/MND would support new or
additional recreational activities at existing park and recreational facilities, including but not
limited to:
• Creating an all-inclusive play area at Jollyman Park.
• Expanding an existing play area with a nature play area or other thematic elements.
• Construction of new restrooms and other small structures such as a shade structures or
small group seating areas.
• Enhancements to sports fields, such as refreshing sports fields at Creekside Park,
restriping tennis courts to share for pickle ball at Monta Vista or Varian Park and adding
a large/full size basketball court at various parks.
• Adding a dog play area at suitable park sites.
• Replacement, renovation, repurposing of park and recreation buildings.
The expansion or development of new park and recreation amenities at existing City parks
could lead to additional visitor use, organized and unorganized sports practices and games, and
gathering and groups of people for parties, picnics, and other events. This increase in activities
could lead to higher noise levels at properties surrounding existing City parks; however, this
increase in noise would not be significant for several reasons. First, in general, it takes a
doubling of activity to result in an approximately 3 dB increase in noise levels.6 This means that
the number of picnic areas, sports fields and similar facilities could double, and noise levels
measured at the same distance would, on average, be approximately 3 dB higher on average.
This potential 3 dB increase would be predicated on: 1) All existing and new park amenities
being used at the same time, at double the existing use, which may or may not be the case; and
2) The new amenities are located the same distance from the receiver location, which also may
or may not be true. Second, the Master Plan does not propose doubling the capacity of sports
fields at any existing park and, therefore, noise levels are not likely to increase by 3 dBA as a
result of Master Plan projects.
Some Master Plan actions may result in more frequent use of existing sport fields or other
facilities, but at a similar scale as the existing use, so the noise levels are not expected to
change significantly. Finally, typical park and recreation activities occur during the daytime
hours when higher permissible noise levels are allowed under the City’s Municipal Code. None
of the projects that are within the scope of this IS would include field lighting, stages, sound
systems, or other infrastructure that would alter existing park operating schedules. For these
reasons, the Master Plan projects that are within the scope of this IS/MND are not anticipated to
result in significant increases in noise levels at noise sensitive receptor locations when
measured on an hourly or daily basis as set forth by the City’s Municipal Code and General
Plan, respectively. In addition, one of the main focuses of the Master Plan is to expand access
to recreational facilities via bike and walking routes, as opposed to taking motorized vehicles.
This would reduce vehicle trips and thereby reduce vehicle related noise. Implementation of the
Master Plan would have a less than significant impact.
Although the total sustained change in noise levels resulting from potential Master Plan projects
is not anticipated to be significant, individual noise events from normal park uses can
sometimes be perceived as a nuisance if such noises: 1) are perceived as a loud, annoying, or
otherwise objectionable by the receiver; 2) occur regularly; and 3) occur in close proximity (i.e.,
6 As described in Section 3.13.1, the dB is a unit of measurement that evaluates sound pressure levels on
a logarithmic scale. As such, a doubling of an activity (e.g., number of kids playing at the playground),
and energy generated by the activity at the same distance from the receiver, would not result in a
doubling of sound measured on the dB scale (e.g., 50 dB + 50 dB ≠ 100 dB), it would result in an increase
of 3 dB (e.g., if the baseline noise level associated with an activity was 50 dB, and the activity doubled,
the new noise level would be 53 dB).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 180
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
generally within 100 – 200 feet) to the noise sensitive receiver. Examples of potential park-
related noises that may be perceived as a nuisance include excessive dog barking, excessive
shouting or yelling, or excessive sports-related noise levels (e.g., whistles, cheering, etc.). New
projects implemented under the Master Plan would be evaluated during future environmental
review for potential nuisance noise sources and designed so that the siting of facilities with the
potential to generate nuisance noise (e.g., dog parks, group picnic areas, etc.) would be located
away from sensitive residential areas. Specifically, these reviews would be conducted
consistent with General Plan Goal HS-8 and Policy HS-8.2, as well as Municipal Code Section
10.40.010. Future environmental review that assesses project consistency with the City’s
General Plan and Municipal Code would minimize or avoid potential nuisance noise issues and
render nuisance noise sources a less than significant impact.
Off-Site Traffic Noise
The potential park enhancements, improvements, and other development actions identified in
the Master Plan that are within the scope of this IS/MND would occur at existing park and
recreation facilities and would not lead to substantial increases in vehicles trips or park
visitation. As described in Section 3.3, Air Quality, discussion a), the Master Plan would support
a reduction in recreation-related vehicle trips and associated VMT through connectivity,
equitable access, and the creation of high quality, inclusive recreation experiences that support
and reflect Cupertino’s unique character. In general, it takes a doubling of traffic, equipment,
etc. to increase noise levels by approximately 3 dBA, depending on environmental conditions
(Caltrans, 2013b). The proposed Master Plan would not double existing noise generating
activities at any park location and, thus, would not result in substantial increases in noise levels.
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less Than Significant Impact. As explained in discussion a), above, the development of future
Master Plan projects could require the use of heavy-duty construction equipment such as small
bulldozers, backhoes, scrapers, compactors/rollers, cranes, material handlers/lifts, and trucks.
In addition to construction noise, this equipment could also generate groundborne vibration. The
potential for groundborne vibration is typically greatest when vibratory or large equipment such
as rollers, impact drivers, or bulldozers are in operation. For potential park projects, the largest
earthmoving equipment would primarily operate during demolition, site preparation, grading, and
paving work. Because specific construction equipment information is not available at this time,
potential construction-related vibration impacts can only be evaluated based on the typical
construction equipment noise levels. Table 3-12 presents the estimated, worst-case vibration
levels that could occur from the operation of typical construction equipment at distances of 25
feet, 50 feet, and 100 feet from the equipment.
Table 3-12:Typical Equipment Groundborne Vibration Levels
Equipment Peak Particle Velocity(A) (Inches/Second) at Distance
25 Feet 50 Feet 100 Feet 400 Feet
Vibratory Roller 0.21 0.085 0.035 0.006
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.036 0.015 0.002
Small Bulldozer 0.03 0.012 0.005 0.001
Loaded Truck 0.076 0.031 0.013 0.002
Jackhammer 0.035 0.014 0.006 0.001
Sources: Caltrans 2013 and FTA 2006. (A) Estimated PPV calculated as: PPV(D)=PPV(ref*(25/D^1.3 where PPV(D)= Estimated PPV at distance; PPVref= Reference
PPV at 25 ft; D= Distance from equipment to receiver; and n= ground attenuation rate (1.3 for competent sands, sandy clays,
silty clays, and silts).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 181
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
As shown in Table 3-12, construction equipment vibration levels from a roller, large bulldozer, or
jackhammer could exceed Caltrans vibration detection thresholds (see Section 3.13.2)for
“barely perceptible” (0.035 inches/second) and approach thresholds for “distinctly perceptible”
(0.24 inches/second) when operating within 25 to 50 feet of a structure and, therefore, would
likely be perceptible at these building locations. This, however, is not considered to be
excessive, because any equipment operation near residences or other structures would be
expected to be short in duration and intermittent (lasting only a few hours or days in work areas
closest to building locations). Additionally, potential construction vibration levels would not result
in structural damage because the estimated vibration levels are substantially below Caltrans’
thresholds for potential damage to even the most sensitive of residential buildings (0.50
inches/second for older, un-reinforced concrete masonry buildings or historic buildings). Thus,
short-term, intermittent construction equipment vibration levels would not be excessive and
would be a less than significant impact.
Once operational, potential Master Plan projects would not result in the operation of equipment
or actives that would generate substantial groundborne vibration levels.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. Although the City receives some aircraft-related noise from planes traveling to and
from San Jose International Airport (approximately six miles northwest of the city center) and
other nearby airports, it is not located in a noise-impacted area for any airport. There are no
private airports in the vicinity of the City; therefore, no impact would occur from private airport
facilities. Adoption of the Park Master Plan would not have an impact related to excessive
airport-related noise levels.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 182
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Induce a substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
3.14.1 Environmental and Regulatory Setting
The City of Cupertino General Plan and FEIR presents a comprehensive discussion of the City’s
population and housing infrastructure and needs and presents the City’s housing policies in
Chapter 4.11 of the FEIR. In 2018, Cupertino had a population of approximately 60,170 and
approximately 20,715 housing units (U.S. Census Bureau 2019). The City’s household
composition is weighted towards family households with children and has a correspondingly
larger household size (2.83) than the overall Bay Area (Cupertino 2015b).
Several state and regional housing laws and regulations direct Cupertino’s planning for its
housing needs, including the California Housing Element Law, Association of Bay Area
Governments Projections, Plan Bay Area, Strategy for a Sustainable Region, and the City’s
General Plan. The General Plan indicates the City’s fair-share of housing production to meet
regional needs is 1,064 units (Cupertino 2015b).
3.14.2 Discussion
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
No Impact. No residential development is proposed as part of the Master Plan. The Master
Plan would provide a vision and a cohesive strategy to guide future park development,
renovation, and management of the City’s park and recreation facilities. It anticipates projected
population growth by planning for increased needs and use of City park facilities.
Implementation of the Master Plan would not induce substantial population growth either directly
or indirectly. While some projects/improvements may require additional service jobs, they would
not result in a new substantial increase in population growth.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The Master Plan serves as a guide to expand, preserve, and enhance the City’s
park land and recreational facilities. Master Plan recommendations would not displace existing
people or housing such that the construction of replacement housing would be necessary.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 183
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.15 PUBLIC SEVICES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
3.15.1 Environmental Setting
The City of Cupertino is a full-service city with public works and park and recreation
departments, library and cultural arts programs, educational institutions, as well as youth, senior
and childcare services, and public safety services provided by County Sheriff and County Fire.
Emergency Services
Fire Protection
The Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD) provides fire protection services for the City
of Cupertino from the Cupertino Fire Station, located at 20215 Stevens Creek Boulevard
(http://www.sccfd.org/about-sccfd/fire-station-locations/cupertino-fire-station). Additional fire
stations are located at 21000 Seven Springs Parkway and 22620 Stevens Creek Boulevard.
The department employs personnel for fire prevention, suppression, investigation,
administration, and maintenance, as well as a daily emergency response team. The
department's suppression force is also augmented by volunteer firefighters
(https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/public-safety/fire).SCCFD maintains minimum
or target response time standards for fire and emergency service calls. For calls for Emergency
Medical Services (EMS), a fire company with one paramedic is expected to arrive in under 8
minutes, 90 percent of the time. For structure fire calls, the first unit is expected to arrive in
under 8 minutes, 90 percent of the time; also, an effective firefighting force is expected on-
scene in less than 15 minutes from dispatch of alarm at least 90 percent of the time. According
to the 2017 Annual Report, the SCCFD is currently meeting response time standards (SCCFD
2017).
Law Enforcement
The City, and a number of surrounding jurisdictions, contract with the Santa Clara County
Sheriff’s Office, West Valley Division, for law enforcement services. The West Valley Division
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 184
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Substation is located in Cupertino at 1601 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite #148. There are twenty-eight
deputies allocated to the City of Cupertino, of which twenty-one deputies perform routine patrol
functions within the City, twenty-four hours a day (seven deputies have special assignments).
Emergency Operations Center
The City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is located on the first floor of City Hall, with an
alternate location in the Service Center on Mary Avenue. In coordination with the fire
department County Sheriff’s Office and teams of volunteer responders, the OES assures that
emergency preparedness and disaster response resources are in place. OES operations
include, but are not limited to, having an emergency communication plan, having means to
provide emergency water, food, and medical supplies on hand and being trained to provide
CPR and first aid. The City’s emergency communications plan includes several information
methods: Alert SCC, Cupertino.org, the City Channel, Radio Cupertino, and social media sites
such as Facebook and Nextdoor.
Schools
The City of Cupertino is served by three different school districts: Cupertino Union School
District (CUSD), Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD), and Santa Clara Unified School
District (SCUSD). The CUSD and FUHSD are two main school districts serving Cupertino, and
SCUSD serves a small area in the northeast corner of the City.
The CUSD serves the majority of Cupertino and some of neighboring cities, including Los Altos,
San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and some unincorporated Santa Clara County areas. The
CUSD operates 27schools, including 22 elementary schools and five middle schools. Among 25
schools, eight elementary schools and three middle schools are located within the Cupertino city
boundary (CUSD 2019h).
The SCUSD serves the small area in the northeast corner that neither CUSD nor FUHSD
serves. Cupertino students within the SCUSD attend Laurelwood Elementary School, Peterson
Middle School, and Wilcox High School (Cupertino 2019h).
The FUHSD operates five comprehensive high schools, three of which are located within the
Cupertino city boundary – Cupertino, Homestead, and Monta Vista High Schools. The District
also provides an adult school, a community day school, and numerous alternative programs
which serve targeted student populations and/or those students who may benefit from a
different educational environment, such as Middle College and College Now (located on the De
Anza College campus) (FUHSD).
Parks
The City of Cupertino has approximately 224 acres of park, trails, and sports fields at 32 sites
managed by the City. These include a variety of parks ranging from smaller neighborhood parks
to large parks that attract people from across the community. Residents also benefit from
nearby Santa Clara County parks, open space preserves, as well as other local parks and
recreation resources owned and managed by other providers (see Figure 2-2).
The parks contain typical park amenities for both active and passive recreation, including lawn
areas, BBQ areas, walking paths, sports fields, sports courts, restrooms and playgrounds.
Cupertino’s parks are well maintained, with standardized landscapes. Some newer parks, such
as Sterling Barnhart, provide newer design features and higher amenity levels, and the
Environmental Education Center in McClellan Ranch Preserve is a state-of-the-art green
building. Trails along creeks owned and managed by Valley Water supplement Cupertino’s
overall open space and park system. Valley Water helped with the acquisition of lands within
McClellan Ranch Preserve.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 185
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
City parks and recreation facilities are also home to numerous events and programs offered in a
variety of different program service areas, ranging from Aquatics to Life-long Learning
&Enrichment. Within the park system, 9 indoor facilities support recreation:
• Portal Park Building
• Creekside Park Building
• Wilson Ceramic Center
• Environmental Education Center (McClellan Ranch Preserve)
• Monta Vista Recreation Center
• Quinlan Community Center
• Senior Center
• Sports Center
• Community Hall
Library
The Cupertino Library is located in Cupertino's Civic Center complex and is operated by the
Santa Clara County Library system. The library facility is owned and maintained by the City of
Cupertino, located at 10800 Torre Avenue, which is across from City Hall. A Civic Center Master
Plan was adopted in 2015 to meet the facility and parking needs of the various site elements,
including the Library, Library Field, City Hall, Community Hall, and the plaza (City of Cupertino).
Community Centers
The Quinlan Community Center is located at 10185 N. Stelling Road in Cupertino. Opened to
the public in 1990, this 27,000 square foot facility is home to the City of Cupertino's Parks and
Recreation Department and the Cupertino Historical Museum, with the art of the Cupertino Fine
Arts League often lining the walls throughout the building. The Quinlan Community Center is a
multi-use building, offering classrooms for recreation classes, events and programs, as well as a
variety of other rooms available to rent.
The Cupertino Senior Center is located at 21251 Stevens Creek Boulevard. The center offers
opportunities for education, recreation, travel, socializing, volunteering, and other services for
those aged 50 and older.
3.15.2 Regulatory Setting
Local Regulations
General Plan
The following policies from the General Plan relate to public services in the project area:
• Policy LU-8.5. Plan land use and design projects to allow the City to maintain efficient
operations in the delivery of services including, community centers, parks, roads, and
storm drainage, and other infrastructure.
• Policy LU-11.1. Create pedestrian and bicycle access between new developments and
community facilities. Review existing neighborhood circulation to improve safety and
access for students to walk and bike to schools, parks, and community facilities such as
the library.
• Policy LU-16.2. Create a civic heart for Cupertino that enables community building by
providing community facilities, meeting and gathering spaces, public art, and space for
recreation and community events.
• Policy LU-27.9. Improve equitable distribution of community amenities such as parks
and access to shopping within walking and bicycling distance of neighborhoods.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 186
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy M-2.3. Promote pedestrian and bicycle improvements that improve connectivity
between planning areas, neighborhoods and services, and foster a sense of community.
• Policy HS-3.1. Coordinate wildland fire prevention efforts with adjacent jurisdictions.
Encourage the County and the Midpeninsula Open Space District to implement
measures to reduce fire hazards, including putting into effect the fire reduction policies of
the County Public Safety Element, continuing efforts in fuel management, and
considering the use of “green” fire break uses for open space lands.
• Policy HS-3.2. Involve the Fire Department in the early design stage of all projects
requiring public review to assure Fire Department input and modifications as needed.
• Policy HS-4.2. Consider appropriate design techniques to reduce crime and vandalism
when designing public spaces and reviewing development proposals.
• Policy RPC-1.1. Prepare a citywide Parks and Recreation Master Plan that outlines
policies and strategies to plan for the communities open space and recreational needs.
• Policy RPC-1.2. Continue to implement a park land acquisition and implementation
program that provides a minimum of three acres per 1,000 residents.
• Policy RPC-2.1. The City’s park land acquisition strategy should be based upon three
broad objectives:
o Distributing parks equitably throughout the City;
o Connecting and providing access by providing paths, improved pedestrian and
bike connectivity and signage; and
o Obtaining creek lands and restoring creeks and other natural open space areas,
including strips of land adjacent to creeks that may be utilized in creating buffer
areas, trails and trail amenities.
• Policy RPC-2.2. Encourage the continued existence and profitability of private open
space and recreation facilities through incentives and development controls.
• Policy RPC-2.3. Strive for an equitable distribution of parks and recreational facilities
throughout the City. Park acquisition should be based on the following priority list.
Accessibility to parks should be a component of the acquisition plan.
o High Priority: Parks in neighborhoods or areas that have few or no park and
recreational areas.
o Medium Priority: Parks in neighborhoods that have other agency facilities such
as school fields and district facilities, but no City parks.
o Low Priority: Neighborhoods and areas that have park and recreational areas
which may be slightly less than the adopted City’s park land standard.
o Private Development: Consider pocket parks in new and renovated projects to
provide opportunities for publicly-accessible park areas.
• Policy RPC-2.4. Ensure that each home is within a half-mile walk of a neighborhood park
or community park with neighborhood facilities; ensure that walking and Municipal Code
biking routes are reasonably free of physical barriers, including streets with heavy traffic;
provide pedestrian links between parks, wherever possible; and provide adequate
directional and site signage to identify public parks.
• Policy RPC-3.1. Design parks to utilize natural features and the topography of the site in
order to protect natural features and keep maintenance costs low.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 187
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy RPC-4.1. Design parks appropriately to address the facility and recreational
programming required by each special area and neighborhood based on current and
future plans for the areas.
• Policy RPC-4.2. Design parks to enhance public safety by providing visibility to the street
and access for public safety responders.
• Policy RPC-6.2. Enhance the City’s recreational programs and library service through
partnerships with other agencies and non-profit organizations. Maintain and strengthen
existing agreements with agencies and non-profit organizations, including the Library
District, to ensure progressive excellence in the facilities, programs, and services
provided to the diverse and growing Cupertino population.
• Policy RPC-8.1. Partner with school districts to allow community use of their sports fields
and facilities.
Municipal Code
Title 13, Parks, contains regulations and standards for parks and recreation buildings in the City
for all people to enjoy while protecting the rights of surrounding areas. Title 13 regulates any
activities that may occur at parks and recreation buildings at the time of events and/or use,
which includes, but is not limited to, sanitation requirements, vehicle requirements, picnic area
requirements, advertising and sale restrictions, administrative and enforcement authority, and
violation penalties. It also regulates the provision of park and recreational facilities upon
development for which dedication of land and/or payment of a fee is required in accordance with
the adopted General Plan.
Chapter 14.05, Park Maintenance Fee, in Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping,
establishes impact fees to finance the establishment, rehabilitation and maintenance of
neighborhood and community parks and recreation facilities in order to reduce the impacts of
declining open space within the City created by new single-lot residential development within
the City. The fee is used solely to finance the acquisition and maintenance of parks and
recreation facilities. The fee is calculated by multiplying the park acreage standard, average
number of persons per residential dwelling unit, and value per acre.
Title 18, Subdivisions, contains regulations for subdivisions, including park dedication and/or in-
lieu fees. Chapter 18.24 (Dedications and Reservations) includes different dedication
requirements for the City in Article II (Park Land Dedication). The Park Land Dedication
regulations are applied to all development except commercial or industrial subdivisions,
condominium conversion, convalescent hospitals, and similar dependent care facilities. The
amount of dedicated land is determined by multiplying the average number of persons per unit
and the park acreage standard of 3 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents as allowed by
the Quimby Act. The amount of the in-lieu fee is based on the fair market value of the land
which would otherwise be required to be dedicated.
Title 19, Zoning, sets regulations and standards for land uses within the City. Chapters 19.88
(Open Space Zones), 19.92 (Park and Recreation Zones), and 19.96 (Private Recreation Zone)
contain land use and development standards for open space, parks, and recreation buildings
and uses. Chapter 19.88 (Open Space Zones) applies to open space uses in private natural
areas in order to avoid urban sprawl and to preserve environmentally sensitive areas; Chapter
19.92 (Park and Recreation Zones) applies to land uses and recreational activities in publicly-
owned parks and recreation areas. Chapter 19.96 (Private Recreation Zone) provides
development standards for private recreational activities, including indoor recreational facilities.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 188
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.15.3 Discussion
Would the proposed project:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police?
No Impact. (Responses i and ii). The Master Plan does not propose additional residential or
other population-inducing development that would contribute to the need for the construction of
additional facilities to maintain acceptable performance standards for fire protection or police
facilities. Many of projects, opportunities, and actions contemplated in the Master Plan are minor
in nature and would involve improving existing parks (see Section 2.6.1 in Project Description).
These minor projects would not substantially alter the accessibility or response time of
emergency personnel to these sites and would have no impact on police or fire protection
services.
Table 2-4 identifies types of potential new major park and recreation facilities including potential
new neighborhood parks, potential major new facilities such as an aquatics center, gymnasium
complex and multi-use recreation center, or performing/fine arts center. Once constructed,
these new facilities would require police and fire protection services but would be unlikely to
impact response times or require the construction of new or altered services that would cause
significant environmental impacts. While the Master Plan identifies specific types of park
improvements contemplated, it does not present project-level design plans for any specific
improvement or project. New park and recreation facilities would be designed and constructed
in conformance with all City plans, policies and ordinances related to police and fire protection,
and they would require separate environmental review once project-specific design information
becomes available.
iii) Schools?
No Impact. Table 2-3 identifies general Master Plan opportunities for continued joint-use
agreements for field use and improved public access on school campuses. The Master Plan
does not make specific improvement recommendations or propose additional residential or
other population-inducing development that would require the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts related to schools.
The City and school districts would coordinate to determine the lead agency for future projects.
Once design and implementation information become available for specific projects, the City
and or school district would evaluate the project to determine if its impacts are covered by this
programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent environmental review is required.
iv) Parks?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Implementation of the Master Plan may result
in the acquisition of new City-owned parks and recreational facilities. Parks and recreation
facilities maybe developed when opportunities for acquisition presented themselves and as
funding allows. The Master Plan as a whole was designed to maintain acceptable performance
standards for parks and recreational activities within the City of Cupertino. Each proposed new
park would be considered, designed, and constructed consistent with adopted City policy,
including but not limited to the City’s standard design and construction measures as listed in the
Project Description Table 2-5, and the General Plan and Municipal Code requirements.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 189
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction
of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and implementation
information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to
determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent
environmental review is required. This IS/MND has included programmatic mitigation measures
that would be applied to all future park projects under the Master Plan for aesthetics, biology,
and cultural/tribal resources (AES-1, BIO-1, CULT-1) that mitigate potentially significant impacts
to those resource areas to less than significant levels. Therefore, adoption of the Master Plan,
as mitigated, would result in less-than-significant significant impacts, including cumulative
impacts, with respect to the construction or improvement of parks and recreational facilities and
the impact associated with the provision of new or physically altered parks is considered less
than significant with mitigation.
v)Other public facilities?
No Impact. The park improvement opportunities presented in the Master Plan, such as
improving playgrounds and play areas, picnic areas, adding community gardens, improving or
constructing new pathways and trail linkages, and improving landscaping, would not require the
provision of other new or physically altered governmental facilities that are not discussed in i-iv,
above, such as libraries. Adoption of the Master Plan would not result in any significant impacts,
including cumulative impacts, with respect to other public facilities such as libraries.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 190
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.16 RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
3.16.1 Environmental Setting
The City of Cupertino owns or manages approximately 224 acres of parks, trails, creek
corridors, sports fields, and recreation facilities at 32 sites located throughout the City.
Cupertino’s existing parks and recreational facilities are described in detail in Section 2.2.1,
Figure 2-2, and Table 2-1 of this IS/MND. These recreational opportunities include community
parks, neighborhood parks, special use sites, trail corridors, and school fields managed by the
City. There are also a number of Santa Clara County or regional open space parks along the
Montebello foothills and Santa Cruz Mountains within the City’s sphere of influence which
provide recreation opportunities for Cupertino residents. However, these areas are not owned,
operated or managed by the City and are primarily outside the City limits, and are thus not part
of the Master Plan.
3.16.2 Regulatory Setting
Local Regulations
General Plan
The following are goals, policies, and strategies of the General Plan regarding parks and
recreation that are related to the proposed Master Plan.
• Policy LU-16.2. Create a civic heart for Cupertino that enables community building by
providing community facilities, meeting and gathering spaces, public art, and space for
recreation and community events.
• Policy ES-5.5. Limit recreation in natural areas to activities compatible and appropriate
with preserving natural vegetation, such as hiking, horseback riding, mountain biking and
camping.
• Policy ES-5.6. Provide open space linkages within and between properties for both
recreational and wildlife activities, most specifically for the benefit of wildlife that is
threatened, endangered, or designated as species of special concern.
• Strategy ES-6.1.2. Consider designating abandoned quarries for passive recreation to
enhance plant and wildlife habitat and rehabilitate the land.
• Policy ES-7.5. Support the Santa Clara Valley Water District efforts to find and develop
groundwater recharge sites within Cupertino and provide public recreation where
possible.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 191
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy ES-7.8. Retain and restore creek beds, riparian corridors, watercourses and
associated vegetation in their natural state to protect wildlife habitat and recreation
potential and assist in groundwater percolation. Encourage land acquisition or dedication
of such areas.
• Policy HS-7.3. Allow commercial and recreational uses that are now exclusively within
the flood plain to remain in their present use or to be used for agriculture, provided it
doesn’t conflict with Federal, State, and regional requirements.
• Goal RPC-1. Create a full range of park and recreational resources and preserve natural
resources
• Policy RPC-1.1. Prepare a citywide Parks and Recreation Master Plan that outlines
policies and strategies to plan for the community’s open space and recreational needs.
• Policy RPC-2.2. Encourage the continued existence and profitability of private open
space and recreation facilities through incentives and development controls.
• Policy RPC-2.3. Strive for an equitable distribution of parks and recreational facilities
throughout the City. Park acquisition should be based on the following priority list.
Accessibility to parks should be a component of the acquisition plan.
o High Priority: Parks in neighborhoods or areas that have few or no park and
recreational areas.
o Medium Priority: Parks in neighborhoods that have other agency facilities such
as school fields and district facilities, but no City parks.
o Low Priority: Neighborhoods and areas that have park and recreational areas
which may be slightly less than the adopted City’s park land standard.
o Private Development: Consider pocket parks in new and renovated projects to
provide opportunities for publicly-accessible park areas.
• Policy RPC-2.5. Provide parks and recreational facilities for a variety of recreational
activities.
• Policy RPC-4.1. Design parks appropriately to address the facility and recreational
programming required by each special area and neighborhood based on current and
future plans for the areas.
• Goal RPC-6. Create and maintain a broad range of recreation programs and services
that meet the needs of a diverse population.
• Policy RPC-6.1. Ensure that the City continues to offer a wide range of programs to
serve diverse populations of all ages and abilities.
• Policy RPC-7.2. Design facilities to be flexible to address changing community needs.
• Policy RPC-7.3. Design facilities to reduce maintenance and ensure that facilities are
maintained and upgraded adequately.
• Policy RPC-8.1. Partner with school districts to allow community use of their sports fields
and facilities.
Municipal Code
The Municipal Code, organized by Title, Chapter, and Section, contains all ordinances for the
City. The following provisions of the Municipal Code apply to parks and recreational services in
Cupertino:
• Title 13, Parks, sets regulations and standards for parks and recreation buildings in the
city for all people to enjoy and protects the rights of surrounding areas as well. Title 13
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 192
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
regulates any activities that may occur at parks and recreation buildings at the time of
the events and/or use, which includes, but is not limited to, sanitation requirements,
vehicle requirements, picnic area requirements, advertising and sale restrictions,
administrative and enforcement authority, and violation penalties.
• Chapter 14.05, Park Maintenance Fee, in Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping,
establishes impact fees to finance the establishment, rehabilitation and maintenance of
neighborhood and community parks and recreation facilities in order to reduce the
impacts of declining open space within the City created by new single-lot residential
development within the City. The fee is used solely to finance the acquisition and
maintenance of parks and recreation facilities. The fee is calculated by multiplying the
park acreage standard, average number of persons per residential dwelling unit, and
value per acre.
• Title 18, Subdivisions, sets regulations for subdivisions, including park dedication and/or
in-lieu fees. Chapter 18.24 (Dedications and Reservations) includes different dedication
requirements for the City in Article II (Park Land Dedication). The Park Land Dedication
regulations are applied to all development except commercial or industrial subdivisions,
condominium conversion, convalescent hospitals, and similar dependent care facilities.
The amount of dedicated land is determined by multiplying the average number of
persons per unit and the park acreage standard of 3 acres of park land for every 1,000
residents as allowed by the Quimby Act. The in-lieu fee would be determined based
upon the fair market value of the land which would otherwise be required to be
dedicated.
• Title 19, Zoning, sets regulations and standards for land uses within the City. Chapters
19.88 (Open Space Zones), 19.92 (Park and Recreation Zones), and 19.96 (Private
Recreation Zone) contain land use and development standards for open space, parks,
and recreation buildings and uses. Chapter 19.88 (Open Space Zones) applies to open
space uses in private natural areas in order to avoid urban sprawl and to preserve
environmentally sensitive areas; Chapter 19.92 (Park and Recreation Zone) applies to
land uses and recreational activities in publicly-owned parks and recreation areas.
Chapter 19.96 (Private Recreation Zone) provides development standards for private
recreational activities, including indoor recreational facilities.
Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan, June 2016
In June 2016, the City Council adopted the 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan. The Plan is a
long-range planning document designed to encourage bicycling as a safe, practical and healthy
alternative to motor vehicles. It addresses present and future needs of the bicycling community,
lays the groundwork for grant funding eligibility for bicycle projects, and is in close alignment
with the goals set by the Cupertino Bicycle Pedestrian Commission to significantly increase the
attractiveness and safety of bicycling throughout the City, with a particular focus on safe
connectivity to schools. A goal of the Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan that relates to parks
and recreation is as follows:
• Goal 3: Increase and improve bicycle access to community destinations across the City
of Cupertino for all ages and abilities.
Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan, February 2018
To encourage walking as a viable way to get around Cupertino, the City Council adopted the
2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan in February 2018. The Plan outlines physical
improvements to the City that will provide improved access for all ages and abilities. The
following goals of the plan apply to parks and recreation:
• Goal 1: Improve pedestrian safety and reduce the number and severity of pedestrian‐
related collisions, injuries, and fatalities.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 193
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Goal 2: Increase and improve pedestrian access to community destinations across the
City of Cupertino for people of all ages and abilities.
• Goal 3: Continue to develop a connected pedestrian network that fosters an enjoyable
walking experience.
3.16.3 Discussion
The Master Plan focuses on improvements to existing City parks and recreation infrastructure
and assess the need for new parks within the City. The Master Plan provides overall guidance
for long-term decision making by City staff and priorities for park improvements and
development. The Master Plan does not include an analysis of open space or undeveloped
open space. The General Plan is the City’s primary policy document, including for parks and
recreation. The General Plan includes an analysis and policies for a Recreation, Parks, and
Community Services Element. The Master Plan was written to be consistent with the definitions
and standards contained in the General Plan.
The Master Plan aligns with the City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan and Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, adopted in 2016 and 2018 respectively, by identifying needs for
connections to parks, identifying some opportunities for activities that could occur near or
adjacent to the trails, and supporting the need for better access and connections to outdoor
spaces and recreation throughout the City.
Would the proposed project:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project is the adoption and implementation of a
Master Plan with aims to improve existing park and recreational facilities including accessibility.
The result of the Master Plan is therefore likely to increase use of City parks by allowing more
people to be able to visit parks and recreational facilities and by attracting people who do not
currently use these sites with improved facilities. Many of the potential improvements would be
considered an upgrade or enhancement to an existing facility due to the addition of amenities,
landscaping, or minor improvements. Despite the anticipated increase in park use related to the
implementation of the Master Plan, the Master Plan is designed to accommodate both existing
and future populations. Increased sustainability and effective maintenance of City Parks are
goals of the Master Plan. Thus, the Master Plan, by itself, would not cause an increase in use of
the City’s parks that wasn’t previously anticipated [in the General Plan and that would have a
negative impact on recreational facilities.
The City currently has about 3.7 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, when land publicly
accessible through agreements is counted (using U.S. Census Bureau data for the City’s July
2018 population estimate). The General Plan standard is a minimum of 3 acres per 1,000
residents. If the amount of land accessible due to an agreement with Cupertino Union School
District is excluded, the available park land is about 178 acres (or approximately 2.96 acres per
1,000 residents).
The Master Plan standard is a minimum of 3 acres per 1,000 residents, and strives to maintain
a standard of 3.7 acres of park land for every 1,000 residents (including land accessible through
agreements) to serve the community’s anticipated population in 2040. This new park acreage
would be met by the acquisition, dedication, or other means of securing new park and recreation
facilities. Each development of new park and recreation space would be undertaken as a
separate project and would undergo separate CEQA review once project plans were developed.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 194
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
By following Master Plan goals and ensuring that appropriate level of maintenance occurs, as
outlined in the goals, objectives, and policies in the City’s General Plan, impacts to parks would
be at a less than significant level.
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The Master Plan identifies opportunities for new
park and recreational facilities as well as the enhancement of existing park and recreation
facilities. Improvement and updating facilities are addressed in a series of policies within the
City’s Municipal Code (Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping). Furthermore, the Master
Plan was developed to be consistent with the General Plan, the Bicycle Transportation Plan,
and the Pedestrian Transportation Plan. All park projects would be designed, constructed, and
managed according to adopted City policy including the General Plan, other adopted plans, the
Municipal Code, and regional storm water runoff management requirements. The City would
also implement construction contract requirements to protect the environment during
construction as referenced in Section 2.9 and Table 2-5 in Project Description).
Future projects proposed by the Master Plan may have impacts to the environment which would
be considered in project-specific CEQA documents. Implementation of the Master Plan would
have potential impacts to aesthetics (light/glare), biological resources, and cultural/tribal
resources which are considered in this IS/MND. Mitigation (AES-1, BIO-1, CULT-1) is identified
in the relevant sections of this IS/MND to reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
Adoption and implementation of the Master Plan would have a less than significant impact effect
on the environment with mitigation included this CEQA document.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 195
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.17 TRANSPORTATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3(b), which pertains
to vehicle miles travelled?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
3.17.1 Environmental Setting
This analysis summarizes and draws relevant from the environmental and regulatory setting
information for transportation and traffic contained in the General Plan Final EIR (2014b),
Bicycle Transportation Plan (2016), and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018).
Roadway Netw ork
Freeways
The City of Cupertino is served by the following highways:
• I-280 is a north-south freeway that extends from US 101 in San Jose to I-80 in San
Francisco. Within the City of Cupertino, it is generally an east-west oriented eight-lane
freeway with six mixed-flow lanes and two carpool/High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
lanes. Auxiliary lanes, which run from an entrance ramp to the next exit ramp, are
provided along I-280 from Winchester Boulevard to SR 85, except for the segment
between Wolfe Road and De Anza Boulevard. Access to/from the City of Cupertino is
provided via interchanges at Foothill Boulevard, SR85, De Anza Boulevard, Wolfe Road,
Stevens Creek Boulevard, and Lawrence Expressway.
• SR 85 is a north-south freeway that extends from US 101 in South San Jose to US 101
in Mountain View. The freeway has four mixed-flow lanes and two HOV lanes. Access
to/from the City of Cupertino is provided via its interchange with I-280 and interchanges
at Homestead Road, Stevens Creek Boulevard, and De Anza Boulevard.
Major Arterials
A major arterial is a through-road that is expected to carry large volumes of traffic. The major
arterials within and near the City of Cupertino are described below.
• Stevens Creek Boulevard is a major east-west roadway, extending from Permanente
Road in unincorporated Santa Clara County to West San Carlos Street in San Jose. The
number of lanes ranges from two lanes in the western part of the City, to six lanes east
of SR 85.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 196
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Homestead Road is a four-lane, east-west arterial that extends from Foothill Expressway
in the west to Lafayette Street in the east. Much of Homestead Road runs along the
northern border of the City of Cupertino. It has a partial freeway interchange with access
to southbound SR 85 and access from southbound SR 85.
• De Anza Boulevard is an eight-lane, north-south arterial that extends from the City of
Sunnyvale to the City of Saratoga. De Anza Boulevard becomes Sunnyvale-Saratoga
Road north of Homestead Road and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road south of Prospect Road.
Access is provided to/from I-280 and SR 85 via full interchanges at each freeway.
• Wolfe Road is a four- to six-lane, north-south arterial that extends from Stevens Creek
Boulevard in Cupertino to Arques Avenue in Sunnyvale. North of Arques Avenue, it
merges with Fair Oaks Avenue. South of Stevens Creek Boulevard it transitions into
Miller Avenue, which is a four-lane roadway. Wolfe Road provides access to/from I-280
via a partial cloverleaf interchange.
• Lawrence Expressway is an eight-lane north-south expressway. Between US 101 and I-
280, the right-most lane in each direction of travel is designated as a HOV lane. The
HOV lane designation is in effect in both directions of travel during both the AM and PM
peak commute hours. During other times, the lane is open to all users. South of I-280,
Lawrence Expressway is a six-lane expressway. Lawrence Expressway begins at its
junction with SR 237 and extends southward into Saratoga, where it transitions into
Quito Road at Saratoga Avenue. Full interchanges are located at SR 237, US 101, and
I-280.
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Facilities
The following information is summarized from the Cupertino 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Bicycle facilities are categorized into the following three types of bikeways:
• Class I Bike/Shared Use Path: A Class I Bicycle or Shared Use Path provides for bicycle
and pedestrian travel on a paved right-of-way completely separated from streets or
highways. Cupertino has approximately five miles of Class I bikeways, most of which
parallel creek corridors in the community or run through open space.
One regional trail passes through Cupertino. The Stevens Creek Trail is a six-mile long
discontinuous trail that runs parallel to Stevens Creek. In Cupertino, the trail runs south
from Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Road. The Hammond Snyder Loop Trail
connects Cupertino to several regional trails in northwest Cupertino. The Saratoga
Creek Trail, which forms part of the San Tomas Aquino Creek Trail system, runs down
the eastern-most city border.
• Class II Bike Lanes provide a signed, striped, and stenciled lane for one-way travel on a
roadway. Bicycle lanes are often recommended on roadways where traffic volumes and
speeds are too high for comfortably sharing the travel lane. Approximately 27 miles of
Class II facilities currently exist in Cupertino. They generally provide for bicyclist travel
along select arterial corridors. Some Class II bike lanes in Cupertino are enhanced with
green paint and/or buffer striping for an increase in visibility or lateral separation from
motorized traffic.
• Class III Bike Routes provide for shared travel lane use and are generally only identified
with signs, but some have “sharrow” markings. A wide curb lane and/or use of shared
use arrow stencil marking on the pavement is known as a “sharrow.” Bike routes may
have a wide travel lane or shoulder that allow for parallel travel with automobiles. They
may also be appropriate on low volume, low speed streets. There are approximately 8.5
miles of Class III bike paths within the City.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 197
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
•Class IV Bike Lane (Separated Bikeway): A Class IV Bike Lake is an exclusive facility for
bicyclists that is located within or directly adjacent to the roadway and is physically
separated from motor vehicle traffic with a vertical element. Two such facilities within the
City will be located on Stevens Creek Boulevard between Tantau Avenue and Wolfe
Road with plans to extend to Foothill Boulevard and on McClellan Road from Imperial
Ave to Stelling Boulevard, with plans to extend to Byrne Avenue.
For a map of these facilities, please refer to Figure 1-4 in the Cupertino Bicycle Transportation
Plan. The City’s Bicycle Transportation Plan Update Initial Study (2016) noted that the bike
network in the City is largely disjointed and does not provide adequate connectivity. The Bicycle
Transportation Plan’s intent is to improve existing facilities and to connect those facilities to a
larger network of bikeways to provide for greater usage (Cupertino 2016).
Pedestrian Facilities
The following information is summarized from the City of Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation
Plan (PTP, 2018). The PTP is being used to achieve the City’s vision for an inviting, safe, and
connected pedestrian network that enhances the quality of life for all community members and
visitors. The document complements the bicycle network envisioned in the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, to create comprehensive active transportation options of safe routes for
pedestrians and bicyclists. Pedestrian facilities are primarily composed of sidewalks and
pedestrian signals at intersections along most major streets in Cupertino. The PTP identifies a
number of parks that do not provide continuous sidewalks on surrounding roadways including:
Three Oaks Park, Hoover Park, Civic Hall/Center, Memorial Park/Quinlan Community Center,
Varian Park, Stevens Creek Corridor Park, and Monta Vista Park. See additional description of
the PTP and proposed improvements, below, in Regulatory Setting.
Transit Services
The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) bus routes circulate throughout
Cupertino. Bus stops are located along major streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard, De
Anza Boulevard, Stelling Road, Bollinger Road, Homestead Road, Wolfe Road, and Tantau
Avenue.
The City of Cupertino is in the process of launching an 18-month pilot program for a 10-van, on-
demand micro-transit system powered by Via, an on-demand shuttle transportation service
(Cupertino 2019). Anticipated to launch in fall 2019, this will bring transit service to all of
Cupertino, including several locations outside of Cupertino, such as Sunnyvale Caltrain and
Kaiser-Permanente Santa Clara. On-demand ride-sharing has no fixed routes and relies on a
mobile phone application (App) or phone number to request rides. Initial hours of operation will
be Monday – Friday from 6am – 8pm and Saturday from 9am – 5pm.
3.17.2 Regulatory Setting
This section describes federal, State, regional, and local environmental laws and policies that
are relevant to the CEQA review process for transportation and circulation.
Federal Regulations
Americans with Disabilities Act
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides comprehensive rights and
protections to individuals with disabilities. The goal of the ADA is to assure equality of
opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for people with
disabilities. To implement this goal, the US Access Board, an independent Federal agency
created in 1973 to ensure accessibility for people with disabilities, has created accessibility
guidelines for public rights-of-way. While these guidelines have not been formally adopted, they
have been widely followed by jurisdictions and agencies nationwide in the last decade. These
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 198
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
guidelines, last revised in July 2011, address various issues, including roadway design
practices, slope and terrain issues, and pedestrian access to streets, sidewalks, curb ramps,
street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking, public transit, and other components of public
rights-of-way. These guidelines would apply to proposed roadways in the City and facilities
within City parks.
State Regulations
California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358)
Originally passed in 2008, California’s Complete Streets Act took effect in 2011 and requires
local jurisdictions to plan for land use transportation policies that reflect a “complete streets”
approach to mobility. “Complete streets” comprises a suite of policies and street design
guidelines which provide for the needs of all road users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit
operators and riders, children, the elderly, and the disabled. From 2011 onward, any local
jurisdiction—county or city—that undertakes a substantive update of the circulation element of
its general plan must consider “complete streets” and incorporate corresponding policies and
programs.
Senate Bill 743
Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed into law on September 27, 2013. SB 743 started a process that
is fundamentally changing transportation impact analysis as part of CEQA compliance. These
changes include the elimination of auto delay, level of service (LOS), and other similar
measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant
impacts. Further, parking impacts are not considered significant impacts on the environment.
The new revised CEQA Guidelines were adopted on December 28, 2018 and incorporate a
vehicle mile traveled (VMT) standard to evaluate traffic impacts. This evaluation approach will
go into effect by July 2020 as noted below.
Local Regulations
General Plan
Cupertino’s traffic and transportation-related policies are found within General Plan Chapter 5:
Mobility. Specific policies regarding traffic and transportation that are relevant to the proposed
Master Plan include:
• Policy M-1.2: Transportation Impact Analysis. Participate in the development of new
multi-modal analysis methods and impact thresholds as required by Senate Bill 743.
However, until such impact thresholds are developed, continue to optimize mobility for
all modes of transportation while striving to maintain the following intersection Levels of
Service (LOS) at a.m. and p.m. peak traffic hours:
o Major intersections: LOS D
o Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard: LOS E+
o Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road: LOS E+
o De Anza Boulevard and Bollinger Road: LOS E+
• Policy M-1.3: Regional Trail Development. Continue to plan and provide for a
comprehensive system of trails and pathways consistent with regional systems including
the Bay Trail, Stevens Creek Corridor, and Ridge Trail.
• Policy M-2.1: Street Design. Adopt and maintain street design standards to optimize
mobility for all transportation modes including automobiles, walking, bicycling, and
transit.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 199
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Policy M-2.2: Adjacent Land Use. Design roadway alignments, lane widths, medians,
parking and bicycle lanes, crosswalks and sidewalks to complement adjacent land uses
in keeping with the vision of the Planning Area. Strive to minimize adverse impacts and
expand alternative transportation options for all Planning Areas (Special Areas and
Neighborhoods). Improvement standards shall also consider the urban, suburban and
rural environments found within the City.
• Policy M-2.3: Connectivity. Promote pedestrian and bicycle improvements that improve
connectivity between planning areas, neighborhoods and services, and foster a sense of
community.
• Policy M-2.5: Public Accessibility. Ensure all new public and private streets are publicly
accessible to improve walkability and reduce impacts on existing streets.
• Policy M-2.6: Traffic Calming. Consider the implementation of best practices on streets
to reduce speeds and make them user-friendly for alternative modes of transportation,
including pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Policy M-3.1: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Adopt and maintain a Bicycle and
Pedestrian master plan, which outlines policies and improvements to streets, extension
of trails, and pathways to create a safe way for people of all ages to bike and walk on a
daily basis.
• Policy M-3.2: Development. Require new development and redevelopment to increase
connectivity through direct and safe pedestrian connections to public amenities,
neighborhoods, shopping, and employment destinations throughout the city.
• Policy M-3.3: Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossings. Enhance pedestrian and bicycle
crossings and pathways at key locations across physical barriers such as creeks,
highways, and road barriers.
• Policy M-3.6: Safe Spaces for Pedestrians. Require parking lots to include clearly
defined paths for pedestrians to provide a safe path to building entrances.
• Policy M-5.3: Connections to Trails. Connect schools to the citywide trail system.
• Policy M-8.2: Land Use. Support development and transportation improvements that
help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing per capita Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT), reducing impacts on the City’s transportation network and maintaining the
desired levels of service for all modes of transportation.
Municipal Code
Title 11 of the City’s Municipal Code outlines numerous policies relating to vehicles, bicycles,
pedestrians, parking, and traffic. Chapters relating to the project discuss bicycle use (Chapter
11.08), pedestrians (Chapter 11.09), parking regulations (Chapter 11.24-11.28), and truck
routes (11.32), and roadway design features (Chapter 11.34).
Cupertino 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan
Cupertino prepared a Bicycle Transportation Plan in 2016 to guide the development and
implementation of improving the City’s bicycling environment. The Plan included a needs
analysis, infrastructure recommendations, trail feasibility study, recommended programs, and
implementation strategy. Three main goals of the plan were identified:
Goal 1: Increase awareness and value of biking through encouragement, enforcement,
and evaluation programs.
Goal 2: Safety: Improve bicyclist safety through the design and maintenance of roadway
improvements.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 200
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Goal 3: Mobility: Increase and improve bicycle access to community destinations across
the City of Cupertino for all ages and abilities.
It also identified the following recommendations related to the Master Plan:
•Develop a comprehensive bicycle wayfinding program that offers guidance to key
destinations including schools, parking, regional trails, landmarks, and civic buildings.
•Update the existing bike parking ordinance requiring all new major development to
provide bicycle parking in accordance with the rates specified:
o Parks; bicycle parking should be located next to restrooms, picnic areas, fields
and other attractions, 8 bicycle parking spaces per acre.
o Public Facilities (libraries, community centers): bicycle parking should be located
near the main entrance with good visibility, 8 bicycle parking spaces per location.
•Develop special driveway standards on key bicycle corridors that allow an easier
transition to and from the roadway for bicyclists.
•Recommends bikeway and bike boulevard locations (road) and mileage.
Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2018)
The City of Cupertino recently approved a Pedestrian Master Plan (February 2018) to achieve
its vision of an inviting, safe and connected pedestrian network that enhances the quality of life
for all community members and visitors. The plan is a guiding framework for the development
and maintenance of pedestrian facilities throughout the City and recommend policies, programs,
and messaging to support and promote walking.
The three primary goals of the plan are to improve safety, access, and connectivity.
•Safety: Improve pedestrian safety and reduce the number and severity of pedestrian-
related collisions, injuries, and fatalities.
•Access: Increase and improve pedestrian access to community destinations across the
City of Cupertino for people of all ages and abilities.
•Connectivity: Continue to develop a connected pedestrian network that fosters an
enjoyable walking experience.
The plan also outlines a strategy to prioritize projects/improvements that should be
implemented, with the lowest cost improvements (that do not require curb or drainage
improvements) to be implemented within the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as on-going
pedestrian infrastructure maintenance.
General recommendations related to park and recreation facilities include:
•Ensure that pedestrian improvements are included in other …projects.
•Continue to fund elimination of high-priority sidewalk gaps through the CIP.
Various improvements included in the Pedestrian Transportation Plan include:
•Pedestrian pathway projects (shared use paths for non-motorized users) (Stevens Creek
Corridor Park, Creekside Park, Wilson Park, and Civic Center)
•Sidewalk improvements (near Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Monta Vista Park, and
Memorial Park),
•Traffic calming projects (near Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stevens Creek Corridor
Park),
•Intersection improvements (Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Memorial Park and Quinlan
Community Center, Civic Hall), and
•Other pedestrian projects.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 201
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Cupertino ADA Transition Plan (2015)
In 2015, the City of Cupertino adopted an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self‐Evaluation
and Transition Plan in accordance with the requirements of the ADA for public entities. The ADA
Transition Plan reviews the programs, activities, and services provided by the City and identifies
and prioritizes removal of current barriers to accessibility.
The Transition Plan also includes a ten‐year plan for accessibility barrier removal (15‐year
schedule for barrier removal within the public rights‐of‐way). The Plan prioritizes the criteria for
barrier removal on public rights‐of‐way as follows:
1. Government offices and facilities
2. Bus stops and transportation facilities
3. Places of public accommodation such as commercial and business areas
4. Facilities containing employers
5. Other areas such as residential neighborhoods and underdeveloped regions of the City
The Plan notes that the City has an annual curb ramp program, and that a park accessibility
project was completed, including curb ramps and accessibility upgrades installed at Varian
Park, Hoover Park, Three Oaks Park, Jollyman Park, and at Homestead Road and Barranca
Drive. The Appendix of the ADA Transition Plan reviews public right‐of‐way accessibility
compliance adjacent to City properties; the largest projects include Stevens Creek Boulevard
and Monta Vista Park.
Heart of the City Specific Plan
The Heart of the City Specific Plan guides development and redevelopment of the Stevens
Creek Boulevard corridor to implement the vision of “pedestrian‐inclusive gathering places” to
support a sense of place for Cupertino residents and visitors. According to the Specific Plan,
new development projects “should include pedestrian and bicycle pathways.” The Specific Plan
also includes streetscape design guidelines that emphasize improving the pedestrian
environment. Plan Bay Area, the 2013 long‐range regional transportation plan adopted by the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC), identified the Heart of the City area as a Priority Development Area.
3.17.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
No Impact. Goal 2 of the Master Plan is to improve connectivity of people to parks and
recreation facilities and includes policies to implement the proposed trails and paths identified in
the Bicycle Transportation Plan, Pedestrian Transportation Plan, General Plan, Countywide
Trails Master Plan, and other local and regional plans to improve access to parks and expand
walking and biking opportunities in Cupertino. Master Plan Objective 3.C addresses expansion
of recreation opportunities by enhancing park and facility access. Policy 3.C.iv includes
consideration of programmatic and physical improvements to improve access by motorized and
public transportation, improve drop-off areas and loading/unloading zones, facilitation or
connection of residents to shuttle, transit, or transportation options. Policy 3.C.vii also promotes
universal design features to ensure access is also planned with specific user groups with
special needs in mind. The Master Plan is consistent with adopted plans, ordinances, and
policies addressing circulation, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Therefore, there is
no impact.
Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction
of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and implementation
information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 202
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent
environmental review is required.
b)Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(b), which
pertains to vehicle miles travelled?
Less than Significant Impact. Amendments to the CEQA Guidelines were adopted at the end
of December 2018 to give the lead agency the option of analyzing CEQA traffic impacts using
the VMT approach rather than the LOS approach until July 1, 2020, at which time the use of the
VMT analysis approach will be mandatory in all CEQA documents (see CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3(c)). CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(a), defines VMT as the amount and
distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. The City has not approved local guidance
or thresholds for VMT; however, guidance from the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
(OPR) is available (OPR 2018). The City has however, included an advisory VMT discussion in
CEQA documents since 2014. The General Plan EIR (2015) provides a City-wide discussion on
the VMT impacts associated with the proposed General Plan updates. The General Plan EIR
estimated the total VMT per capita to be 10.9 miles per service population per day in 2040 (see
the Transportation and Traffic Chapter of the 2015 General Plan EIR for a comprehensive
discussion of City-wide VMT under the proposed General Plan update conditions).
Daily and per capita VMT reflects a community’s land use patterns, particularly housing and
employment patterns. The Parks and Recreation System Master Plan has been developed to be
consistent with the City’s existing adopted planning and land use documents. As such,
implementation of the Master Plan enhancement opportunities is not anticipated to increase
population, employment patterns, or alter existing land use patterns in a manner that would
result in a significant increase in VMT. Implementation of certain enhancement opportunities at
individual parks may increase usage of that park (increased vehicle trips and VMT) but this
increase is not anticipated to be significant because most trips are assumed to be generated
within Cupertino and the distances to neighborhood and local parks is relatively short.
The proposed Master Plan is also not anticipated to increase VMT because it is consistent with
City policies for multi-model transportation which would decrease vehicle trips to City parks.
Master Plan Goal 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D all promote improved trails for bicycle and pedestrian
access to parks, support facilities for park users who need shade, water and benches along
pathways, and physical and programmatic enhancements to facilitate walking and bicycling to
parks. Master Plan Goal 3A establishes a goal of providing parks within walking distance of
most residential areas, consistent with Land Use/Community Design General Plan Policy 2‐84.
•Policy 2-84: Park Walking Distance. Ensure that each household is within a half‐mile
walk of a neighborhood park, or community park with neighborhood facilities, and that
the route is reasonably free of physical barriers, including streets with heavy traffic.
Wherever possible, provide pedestrian links between parks.
Because the Master Plan would not alter existing land use patterns and is consistent with
adopted City transportation, and multi-modal planning policies the adoption and implementation
of Master Plan would not result in a significant VMT impact. This impact is therefore less than
significant.
General Plan Policy M-1.2 directs the City to optimize mobility for all modes of transportation
and use LOS standards until such time as new multi-modal method and impact thresholds are
established.
General Plan Policy M-1.2 directs the City to maintain the following LOS standards at AM and
PM peak hours until such time new thresholds are adopted:
•Major intersections – LOS D;
•Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard – LOS E or better;
•Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road – LOS E or better
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 203
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
• De Anza Boulevard and Bollinger Road – LOS E or better.
The Master Plan identifies enhancement opportunities at each City park, many of which would
not result in any changes to existing traffic patterns or volumes and as such, would not
significantly affect LOS associated with the park or recreation facility use (see list of small-scale
projects listed in Section 2.7).
The impact of these small-scale projects is considered less than significant because they are
not likely to affect peak hour travel to and from City parks. Some of the small-scale projects may
improve bicycling and/or pedestrian access and may therefore slightly reduce vehicle trips to
City parks.
Some enhancement opportunities do include activities or facilities which may change traffic
patterns around a specific park, particularly the Potential New Major Features identified in the
Master Plan (such as new aquatic or gym facilities or a new performing arts center). Adoption of
the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction of park
improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once project-level information is developed for
improvements identified in the Master Plan, the City would review the project under CEQA and
determine the appropriate level of environmental review. In the absence of even conceptual-
level design and implementation information, this IS/MND cannot evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of some of the actions contemplated in the Master Plan. Projects with
the likelihood to generate traffic impacts would be evaluated under a separate CEQA
determination process and according to the requirements of CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3(b).
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
Less than Significant Impact. As the City carries out park improvement projects noted in the
Master Plan, all projects would be designed according to relevant design and circulation policies
for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians and would be considerate of design hazards or traffic
conflicts from incompatible uses. Implementation of the Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact on traffic hazards.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The Master Plan does not propose any specific improvements that would alter the
roadway system in a manner that would affect emergency access. As stated above, one of the
goals of the Master Plan is to improve access and connectivity. All new recreation facilities
would be designed according to adopted City policies, roadway and multi-modal design
requirements and would be designed to meet all standards for emergency access.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 204
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resources,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
Tribe.
3.18.1 Environmental Setting
The area encompassed by the City of Cupertino is a region historically occupied by the Tamyen
linguistic group of the Ohlone (first called the Costanoan, or “coastal dwellers” by the Spanish),
near the linguistic boundary with the Ramaytush group (Cupertino 2014b).
The Ohlone lived in tribelets or nations that were dialect distinct from each other, autonomous,
and territorially separated from each other. Each tribelet consisted of one or more permanent
villages, with various seasonal temporary encampments located throughout their territory for the
gathering of raw material resources, hunting, and fishing.
The Ohlone lived in extended family units in domed dwellings constructed from tule, grass, wild
alfalfa, and ferns. The subsistence practices included the consumption of plant resources such
acorns, buckeyes, and seeds that were supplemented with the hunting of elk, deer, grizzly bear,
mountain lions, sea lions, whales, and waterfowl. The Ohlone peoples practiced controlled
burning on an annual basis throughout their territory as a form of land management to insure
plant and animal yields for the coming year (Levy 1987).
The first Europeans to reach the San Francisco Bay area were Spanish explorers in 1769 as
part of the Portolá expedition. In 1774, the de Anza expedition had set out to convert the Native
American tribes to Christianity, resulting in the establishment of Mission Santa Clara de Asis,
founded in 1777 (also known as Mission Santa Clara de Thamien in reference to the Tamyen
people).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 205
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
The native Tamyen people were slowly subjugated and absorbed into the Mission system. By
1795, all the Tamyen villages had been abandoned and the people baptized into the Christian
faith (Cupertino 2014b).
3.18.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal Regulations
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990 sets
provisions for the intentional removal and inadvertent discovery of human remains and other
cultural items from federal and tribal lands. It clarifies the ownership of human remains, and it
sets forth a process for repatriation of human remains and associated funerary objects and
sacred religious objects to the Native American groups claiming to be lineal descendants or
culturally affiliated with the remains or objects. It requires any federally funded institution
housing Native American remains or artifacts to compile an inventory of all cultural items within
the museum or with its agency and to provide a summary to any Native American tribe claiming
affiliation.
State Regulations
California Environmental Quality Act: Unique Archaeological Resources
A unique archaeological resource is an archaeological artifact, object, or site that has a high
probability of meeting any of the following criteria:
1. The archaeological resource contains information needed to answer important
scientific research questions and there is a demonstrable public interest in that
information.
2. The archaeological resource has a special and particular quality such as being the
oldest of its type or the best available example of its type.
3. The archaeological resource is directly associated with a scientifically recognized
important prehistoric or historic event or person.
Native American Heritage Commission, Public Resources Code Sections 5097.9 –
5097.991
Section 5097.91 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) established the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC), whose duties include the inventory of places of religious or social
significance to Native Americans and the identification of known graves and cemeteries of
Native Americans on private lands. Under Section 5097.9 of the PRC, a state policy of
noninterference with the free expression or exercise of Native American religion was articulated
along with a prohibition of severe or irreparable damage to Native American sanctified
cemeteries, places of worship, religious or ceremonial sites or sacred shrines located on public
property. Section 5097.98 of the PRC specifies a protocol to be followed when the NAHC
receives notification of a discovery of Native American human remains from a county coroner.
Section 5097.5 defines as a misdemeanor the unauthorized disturbance or removal of
archaeological, historic, or paleontological resources located on public lands.
California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 2001
Codified in the California H&SC Sections 8010–8030, the California Native American Graves
Protection Act (NAGPRA) is consistent with the federal NAGPRA. Intended to “provide a
seamless and consistent state policy to ensure that all California Indian human remains and
cultural items be treated with dignity and respect,” the California NAGPRA also encourages and
provides a mechanism for the return of remains and cultural items to lineal descendants.
Section 8025 established a Repatriation Oversight Commission to oversee this process. The act
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 206
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
also provides a process for non–federally recognized tribes to file claims with agencies and
museums for repatriation of human remains and cultural items.
Public Resource Code 21074
Pursuant to the PRC, a Tribal Cultural Resource is:
•A site, feature, place, cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe that is either included or determined to be eligible for
inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources, or included in a local register
of historical resources, as defined in subdivision (k) of PRC Section 5020.1.
•A cultural landscape that meets the criteria above is a tribal cultural resource to the
extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape.
•A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the
purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native American tribe.
•A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as
defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “nonunique archaeological resource”
as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it
conforms with the criteria of subdivision (a).
Assembly Bill 52
Assembly Bill (AB) 52 specifies that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural resource, as defined, is a project that may have a significant
effect on the environment. AB 52 requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California
Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the
proposed project, if the tribe requests in writing to the lead agency, to be informed by the lead
agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation, prior to
determining whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental
impact report is required for a project. AB 52 specifies examples of mitigation measures that
may be considered to avoid or minimize impacts on tribal cultural resources.
Local Regulations
The Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan includes goals, policies, and strategies to help
the City protect tribal cultural resources. The following policies from the Cupertino General Plan
relate to Tribal Cultural Resources:
•Policy LU-6.1: Historic Preservation. Maintain and update an inventory of historically
significant structures and sites in order to protect resources and promote awareness of
the City’s history in the following four categories: Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites,
Community Landmarks and Historic Mention Sites.
•Policy LU-6.2: Historic Sites. Projects on Historic Sites shall meet the Secretary of
Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties.
•Policy LU-6.3: Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites and Community Landmarks.
Projects on Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites and Community Landmarks shall
provide a plaque, reader board and/or other educational tools on the site to explain the
historic significance of the resource. The plaque shall include the city seal, name of
resource, date it was built, a written description and photograph. The plaque shall be
placed in a location where the public can view the information.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 207
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
•Policy LU-6.4: Public Access. Coordinate with property owners of public and quasi-
public sites to allow public access of Historic and Commemorative Sites to foster public
awareness and education. Private property owners will be highly encouraged, but not
required, to provide public access to Historic and Commemorative Sites.
•Policy LU-6.6: Incentives for Preservation of Historic Resources. Utilize a variety of
techniques to serve as incentives to foster the preservation and rehabilitation of Historic
Resources including: 1. Allow flexible interpretation of the zoning ordinance not essential
to public health and safety. This could include land use, parking requirements and/or
setback requirements. 2. Use the California Historical Building Codes standards for
rehabilitation of historic structures. 3. Tax rebates (Milles Act or Local tax rebates). 4.
Financial incentives such as grants/loans to assist rehabilitation efforts.
•Policy LU-6.8: Cultural Resources. Promote education related to the City’s history
through public art in public and private developments.
3.18.3 Discussion
Would the proposed project:
(a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that is:
i)Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources,
or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code Section 5020.1(k); or
ii)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to
a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the
lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. There is a single recorded Native American
archaeological resource within a park facility. The recorded archaeological site is within Stevens
Creek Corridor Park (Basin 2006). Several other parks/recreational facilities, including
Community Hall, Creekside Park, Library Field, Jollyman Park, and Varian Park are situated
adjacent to creeks. Creeks were important to the Native American tribes in the Bay Area, and
sites and burials are often associated with tribal artifacts and remains. Although excavation in
areas adjacent to creeks is expected to be minimal, there is a potential to encounter native soils
and, therefore, historic or prehistoric tribal cultural artifacts may be encountered during
construction of Master Plan recommended improvements. Disturbance of Tribal Cultural
Resources would constitute a significant impact under CEQA.
The City plans to undertake a separate site-specific master planning effort for Stevens Creek
Corridor Park including appropriate environmental review. Like all City projects, compliance with
federal, state, General Plan, and Municipal Code policies would be required.
Any ground disturbing work in undeveloped land has the potential for archaeological discovery
which, if Native American in origin, could be considered to be a Tribal Cultural Resource. To
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 208
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
safeguard potential tribal resources from impacts during construction, mitigation measure
CULT-1 described in Section 3-5 will be implemented for park projects not subject to project-
specific CEQA review that require ground moving activity below the existing topsoil, or the prior
depth of excavation.
Archaeological artifacts or sites may not meet the criteria for being a “unique archaeological
resource” and therefore not considered significant under CEQA. However, it is possible for a
lead agency to determine that an artifact is considered significant to a local tribe, and thus
considered a significant resource under CEQA. Thus, mitigation measure CULT-1 includes
language that all Native American tribal finds that are discovered as part of construction or
operation of Master Plan project are to be considered a Tribal Cultural Resource, and thus
significant under CEQA, until the lead agency has enough evidence to make a determination of
significance.
With the implementation of mitigation measure CULT-1, impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources
would be less than significant.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 209
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunication facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
3.19.1 Environmental Setting
Potable Water
Water Supply Sources
Cupertino has two major water suppliers: the California Water Service Company (Cal Water)
and the San Jose Water Company. Both retailers purchase their water supply from Valley Water
(formerly SCVWD). Valley Water, the water management agency in Santa Clara County,
manages groundwater recharge through percolation ponds and in-stream recharge of creeks.
The McClellan Pond recharge facility (located in Cupertino) and the Stevens Creek Reservoir
(located outside the City near its southwest boundary) also contribute to Cupertino’s water
supply.
The amount of yearly groundwater production versus purchased treated water varies depending
on the supply available from Valley Water which imports surface water to its service area from
the South Bay Aqueduct of the State Water Project (SWP), the San Felipe Division of the
federal Central Valley Project (CVP) and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s
(SFPUC) Regional Water System. However, Cal Water only receives Valley Water water from
the SWP and CVP sources.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 210
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Wastewater
Wastewater collection and treatment are provided to the City by the Cupertino Sanitary District
and the City of Sunnyvale. The majority of the City is served by the Cupertino Sanitary District,
while the City of Sunnyvale serves only a small portion of the Cupertino Urban Service area
within the Rancho Rinconada area.
Cupertino Sanitary District
The Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD) collects and transports waste water collected in
Cupertino, as well as portions of Los Altos and Saratoga, to the San Jose/Santa Clara Water
Pollution Control Plant located in North San Jose. The District maintains approximately one
million linear feet of sewer lines and 500,000 linear feet of sewer laterals and 17 pump stations.
Sewer lines serving the City Center development, Stevens Creek Boulevard between Randy
Lane and Wolfe Road, Wolfe Road south of Interstate 280, Stelling Road and Foothill Boulevard
are at capacity or nearing capacity.
Eleven of the seventeen CSD pumps are located in Cupertino. Primary trunk lines serving the
Study Area include 12-inch pipelines in Homestead Road, 15- and 18-inch pipelines along the
north side of Interstate 280 (I-280), 12- and 15-inch pipelines on Wolfe Road, 10-inch pipelines
on De Anza Boulevard, 18-inch pipelines on Shetland Place, and 27-inch pipelines on
Pruneridge Avenue. A metered outfall to the City of Santa Clara sanitary sewer system is
located on Homestead Road near Tantau Avenue. Other minor outfalls to the City of San Jose
are located in the southern part of Cupertino (Cupertino Sanitary District 2016).
Sunnyvale Sewer Collection System
The City of Sunnyvale provides wastewater treatment service for Cupertino’s commercial
properties along Stevens Creek Boulevard, east of Finch Avenue, and a portion of the Rancho
Rinconada neighborhood. The City of Sunnyvale sanitary sewer collection system serves a 25-
square-mile service area. The sewer system consists of 283 miles of gravity sewers, five sewer
lift (pump) stations, and over two miles of sewer force main. Service is provided to all Sunnyvale
residents, and to a portion of the City of Cupertino, including two blocks of Cupertino’s
commercial properties along east Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Sunnyvale W ater Pollution
Control Plant has a daily treatment capacity of 29 million gallons per day (mgd).
San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant
The San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP) cleans and treats the
wastewater of approximately 1,500,000 people that live and work in the 300-square-mile area
encompassing the cities of San Jose, Santa Clara, Milpitas, Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos,
Saratoga and Monte Sereno. CSD entered into a master agreement with the cities of San Jose
and Santa Clara for wastewater treatment in 1983. The agreement establishes capacity rights
and obligations for the operation and operating, maintenance and capital costs of the plant by
member agencies. The SJ/SC WPCP has the capacity to treat 167 mgd utilizing an advanced,
tertiary wastewater system. Most of the final treated water from the SJ/SC WPCP is discharged
as fresh water through Artesian Slough and into South San Francisco Bay. About 13 percent is
recycled through South Bay Water Recycling pipelines for landscaping, agricultural irrigation,
and industrial needs around the South Bay. According to the SJ/SC WPCP Master Plan, the
SJ/SC WPCP wet weather capacity will be increased to 450 mgd. Should the SJ/SC WPCP be
upgraded as described in the WPCP Master Plan, the recycling capabilities would be increased,
with much of the recycled water used in groundwater recharge ponds. The CSD has a contract
with the City of San Jose to use a percentage of the capacity of the City’s sewage treatment
facilities. In return, the contract requires the CSD to pay its share of debt service, operation,
maintenance and improvement costs (City of San Jose 2016).
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 211
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Sunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant
The City of Sunnyvale sewer collection system, which serves a small area of the City along
Stevens Creek Boulevard, directs wastewater to the Sunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant
(SWPCP). The SWPCP has an average dry weather flow of 11.9 mgd. The current total service
area population is approximately 148,000. The SWPCP provides advanced secondary
treatment of wastewater from domestic, commercial, and industrial sources from its service
areas. The City of Sunnyvale owns and operates the SWPCP and its associated collection
system (collectively the facility). Wastewater treatment processes at the SWPCP include
grinding and grit removal, primary sedimentation, secondary treatment through the use of
oxidation ponds, fixed-film reactor nitrification, dissolved air flotation, dual media filtration,
chlorine disinfection, and de-chlorination. The SWPCP’s collection system is a 100 percent
separate sanitary sewer (Sunnyvale Clean Water Program 2018).
Stormwater Drainage
According to the Infrastructure Element of the General Plan, the City’s storm drain system
currently operates adequately, with some targeted upgrades or improvements likely over the
next 25 years. There is only localized flooding in the storm drain system, limited primarily to
unimproved streets. The City continues to update its infrastructure planning to ensure that future
improvements include best practices for stormwater management.
The City, along with 76 other agencies throughout the Bay Area, is regulated by the Municipal
Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (MRP). The MRP,
issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, requires the City to carry out a
comprehensive stormwater pollution prevention program. In order to comply with these
requirements, the City joined with 15 other adjoining agencies to form the Santa Clara Valley
Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPP).
Solid Waste
All non-hazardous solid waste, including mixed construction and demolition (C&D) waste, in
Cupertino is collected by Recology South Bay, and taken to Newby Island Sanitary Landfill for
processing and/or disposal. The City has a contract with Newby Island Sanitary Landfill until
2023.Recology provides residential customers with two bulky item collections per year and
hosts quarterly resident drop off events for bulky items, universal waste, salvageable material
donation, and document shredding. Self-hauled mixed C&D waste generated from private
development and construction projects is hauled to an approved C&D processing facility by the
property owner or the contractor.
Newby Island Landfill
The Newby Island Sanitary Landfill is a subsidiary of Republic Services and is located at 1601
Dixon Landing Road in the City of Milpitas. This 352-acre landfill’s total capacity is 66 million
cubic yards as of 2016.The landfill is anticipated to have sufficient overall capacity until January
2041, its estimated closure date (City of San Jose 2016). Changes to the design or operation of
the facility could extend the estimated closure date. According to the franchise agreement, the
Newby Island Sanitary Landfill is prepared to accept all of the waste generated in Cupertino.
Recycling and Composting
The City of Cupertino has a franchise agreement with Recology to provide recycling and
composting services for the City. Under the franchise agreement, recyclable materials including
organics, are also handled by Recology and taken to processing facilities that Recology either
owns or contracts with for processing of those materials. The recycling and composting
programs for Cupertino expanded in 2017 with the adoption of the Zero Waste Policy to include
more items for recycling and expand collection of recycling and compostable material.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 212
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Electric, Gas and Telecommunications Services
Electricity and Gas Providers
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) provides electricity and natural gas services to the
City of Cupertino. PG&E owns and maintains above and below ground networks of electric and
gas transmission and distribution facilities throughout the city. In March 2016, twelve
communities in Santa Clara County, including Cupertino, formed the Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Authority, a community-owned agency established to operate a Community Choice
Aggregation program. Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) sources the electricity; PG&E then
delivers it over existing utility lines and provides maintenance, billing, and customer service
(SVCE 2018). Both gas and electrical service is available throughout the Master Plan area.
Regulatory requirements for efficient use of electricity and gas are contained in Title 24, Part 6,
of the California Code of Regulations, entitled “Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings.” These regulations specify the State’s minimum energy efficiency
standards and apply to new construction of both residential and nonresidential buildings. The
standards regulate energy consumed for heating, cooling, ventilation, water heating, and
lighting. Compliance with these standards is verified and enforced through the local building
permit process.
Telecommunications Services
The City does not directly supply telecommunications utilities; however, it plays an important
role by coordinating with providers, allowing access to public rights-of-way, and ensuring that
proposed improvements or changes in service meet community expectations and are integrated
in a compatible manner.
3.19.2 Regulatory Setting
Federal and State Regulations
No federal or state regulations are directly applicable to the Master Plan.
Regional Regulations
Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan presents Valley Water’s overall plan
for water resource management in Santa Clara County. Valley Water is the primary water
resources agency for Santa Clara County. This Plan outlines the key water resource issues
facing the county and provides a framework for understanding Valley Water’s policies related to
water supply, natural flood protection, and water resources stewardship. The Plan provides
factsheets for all cities within Santa Clara County, that include shared responsibilities with
SCVWD, City-wide Programs and Projects related to water resources management issues, and
a list of related Plan Elements.
Santa Clara County Integrated Waste Management Plan, November 1995
The Santa Clara County Integrated Waste Management Plan sets policies for reducing waste
and implementing waste management programs, including the Santa Clara County Integrated
Waste Management (IWM) Program. The policies are intended to reduce costs, streamline
administration programs, and encourage a coordinated and carefully planned approach to
implementing integrated waste management.
https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rwr/Documents/CoIWMP/IWM-Summary-plan-and-siting-
element.pdf
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 213
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Local Regulations
General Plan
The Infrastructure Element of Cupertino’s General Plan focuses on finding ways to reduce
demand on infrastructure through sustainable measures and balancing modes of transportation.
This Element includes goals, policies, and strategies for the development and maintenance of a
system of high-quality and adequate infrastructure to support community needs and future
development anticipated in the General Plan. It also ensures that the City’s existing
infrastructure is maintained, upgraded, replaced, and expanded when needed. The following
policies of the Infrastructure Element apply to the P arks Master Plan:
• Policy INF-1.2: Maintenance. Ensure that existing facilities are maintained to meet the
community’s needs.
• Policy INF-5.2: Demand. Look for ways to reduce demand on the City’s wastewater
system through implementation of water conservation measures.
• Policy INF-7.2: Facilities. Ensure that public and private developments build new and on-
site facilities and/or retrofit existing on-site facilities to meet the City’s waste diversion
requirements.
Municipal Code
The Municipal Code includes the following provisions regarding utilities and service systems:
• Chapter 14.15, Landscaping Ordinance, establishes water-efficient landscaping
standards to conserve water use for irrigation. The provisions of this chapter apply to
landscaping projects that include irrigated landscape areas exceeding 2,500 square feet
when these projects are associated with new water service, subdivision improvements,
grading and drainage improvements, a new construction subject to a building permit, or
building additions or modifications subject to grading and drainage plan approval.
• Chapter 15.20, Sewage Disposal Systems, establishes standards for the approval,
installation, and operation of individual on-site sewage disposal systems consistent with
the RWQCB standards. The chapter sets regulation for connecting to public sanitary
sewer system.
• Chapter 16.58, Green Building Ordinance, includes the CALGreen requirements with
local amendments for projects in the City. The City’s Green Building Ordinance codifies
green building techniques, including measures affecting water use efficiency and water
conservation. Section 16.58.220 includes Table 101.10 that identifies the green building
requirements by type of building. Section 16.58.230 permits applicants to apply an
alternate green building standard for a project in lieu of the minimum standards outlined
in Section 16.58.220 that meet the same intent of conserving resources and reducing
solid waste.
• Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste requires
all projects within the City that involve construction, demolition, or renovation of 3,000
square feet or more to comply with the provisions of the chapter, and the compliance
with the chapter will be attached as conditions of approval of any building or demolition
permit issued. An applicant for a covered project is required to recycle or divert at least
60 percent of all generated construction and demolition (C&D) waste by salvage or by
transfer to an approved facility. Prior to the permit issuance, the applicant is required to
submit a properly completed Waste Management Plan, which includes the estimated
maximum amount of C&D waste that can feasibly be diverted, which facility will handle
the waste, and the total amount of C&D waste that will be landfilled.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 214
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Cupertino Climate Action Plan (CAP), 2015
The City prepared a CAP as part of a Santa Clara County regional climate mitigation and
adaptation initiative named Silicon Valley 2.0 (SV 2.0). The CAP’s primary goal is to create a
roadmap to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Cupertino. The City’s CAP strategies comprise
a framework of goals, measures, and actions through which near-term (i.e., 2020) targets can
be achieved, and progress can be made on longer-term (i.e., 2035, 2050) targets. The following
goals of the CAP are relevant to the Master Plan regarding utilities and public services:
•Goal 1 – Reduce Energy Use / Improve Facilities: recommends ways to increase energy
efficiency in existing buildings and increase use of renewable energy community-wide.
•Goal 3 – Conserve Potable Water: promotes the efficient use and conservation of water
in buildings and landscapes.
•Goal 4 – Reduce Solid Waste: increases waste diversion through recycling and organics
collection and reducing consumption of materials that will otherwise end up in landfills.
•Goal 5 – Expand Green Infrastructure Enhance the City’s existing urban forest on public
and private lands.
Cupertino Urban Water Management Plan, 2015
Pursuant to State Water Code requirements, water suppliers providing water for municipal
purposes to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet (approximately
980 million gallons) of water annually must prepare and adopt an urban water management plan
(UWMP) and update it every five years. The State Water Code requires water agencies to
evaluate and describe their water resource supplies and projected needs over a 20-year
planning horizon, and to address a number of related subjects including water conservation,
water service reliability, water recycling, opportunities for water transfers, and contingency plans
for drought events. The City of Cupertino adopted its most recent UWMP prepared by SCVWD
in 2015.
City of Cupertino Zero Waste Policy
The purpose of the Zero Waste Policy, adopted under Resolution 17-2249 in 2017, is to protect
the environment and conserve natural resources; prevent pollutants from entering the air, land,
and water; follow the principle of highest and best use so that reducing and reusing waste
materials occurs first, followed by recycling and composting, so that eventually no material goes
to landfills or high-temperature destruction; create a more sustainable, efficient economy; and
preserve the environment for future generations. Elements of the Zero Waste Policy that are
relevant to the Master Plan include:
•13) Require that all private construction projects that come through the City’s permitting
process, and all City projects (through contract requirements), to recover and divert at
least 65% of the construction waste generated by the project.
3.19.3 Discussion
Tables 2-2, 2-3 and 2-4 contains Master Plan actions with the potential for environmental
impacts. These are the actions that are evaluated in the discussion below. While the Master
Plan identifies specific park enhancement opportunities, it does not present project level design
plans for any specific improvement or project. Once design and implementation information
become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to determine if its
impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent environmental review
is required.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 215
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Would the project:
a)Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
Less Than Significant Impact. Many of the Master Plan opportunities identified for park
projects and improvements would be minor in nature and would not cause a change in the
public utility infrastructure. However, park improvements requiring the use of water or electricity
would likely require the installation of new water and electrical lines and projects with substantial
new pavement would likely require new storm drains. The relocation of existing utility
infrastructure or the construction of new infrastructure (new water lines, storm drains, etc.)
would be done according to City policy and would include the implementation of construction
BMPs that are included in the City’s construction contracts (see discussion in Section 2.9) .
Therefore, this impact would be less than significant.
b)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Master Plan could result in an increased
need for potable water because the Master Plan has identified opportunities for new park
features such as water play, new community gardens, new picnic areas, and new types of
landscaping. In addition, public use of the parks will increase overtime as the population of
Cupertino grows because water usage within the parks would increase as a result of the
increase in use.
The 2015 UWMP has determined that Valley Water’s water supply is adequate to supply the
service area in future Normal Year, Single Dry Year, and Multiple Dry Year conditions (SCVWD
2016). The Master Plan incorporates sustainability recommendations and measures for
promoting water use efficiencies and demand at existing park sites in as presented in Goal 7
(see Table 2-2). All park projects would be designed and constructed consistent with adopted
City policy and would incorporate water conservation measures as appropriate. Many small
improvements identified in the Master Plan would not result in an increase in potable water use.
These projects would have a less than significant on potable water service.
Once project-level information is developed for improvements identified in the Master Plan, the
City would review the project under CEQA and determine the appropriate level of environmental
review. In the absence of even conceptual-level design and implementation information, this
IS/MND cannot evaluate the potential environmental impacts of some of the actions
contemplated in the Master Plan. Future review of these projects would focus on site-specific
environmental issues that could not be examined in sufficient detail as part of this IS/MND.
c)Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or
may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s
projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less Than Significant Impact. Many of the Master Plan park enhancement opportunities are
small in nature and are related to improving park amenities, park infrastructure or landscaping
and would not result in an increase in the generation of wastewater. These projects would have
no impact on the wastewater treatment facility capacity. Other identified opportunities for
projects such as renovation of existing park buildings and adding restrooms where they are not
currently located would result in a small increase in the wastewater generated by the park
system. Implementation of the Master Plan would not exceed wastewater treatment
requirements as determined by the CSD or result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project (City of San Jose 2016,
CSD 2016, SCWP 2016). Therefore, these impacts would be less than significant.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 216
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Potential New Major Features presented in the Master Plan (such as new aquatic or gym
facilities or a new performing arts center) would result in an increase in the generation of
wastewater. Once project-level information is developed for improvements identified in the
Master Plan, the City would review the project under CEQA and determine the appropriate level
of environmental review. In the absence of even conceptual-level design and implementation
information, this IS/MND cannot evaluate the potential environmental impacts of some of the
actions contemplated in the Master Plan. Future review of these projects would focus on site-
specific environmental issues that could not be examined in sufficient detail as part of this
IS/MND.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste
reduction goals?
Less Than Significant Impact. The majority of the City’s solid waste is sent to the Newby
Island Sanitary Landfill, which is estimated to have a closure date of January 2041 (City of San
Jose 2016), Master Plan improvements would generate construction and landscape waste as
facilities are improved. The City would plan and implement park improvement projects
consistent with adopted City policy including sustainability measures (waste reduction) and
Cupertino’s Zero Waste Policy (recycling of construction debris) and park construction projects
would not generate waste that would impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.
The amount of municipal solid waste produced by park users usually reflects the number of
people who use the parks, and may increase over time as a result of implementing the Master
Plan because more people would be using the parks. Any additional waste generated because
of an increase in the use of city parks would be a reflection of the overall population of
Cupertino and would not impair the attainment of solid waste reductions goals because the
amount of increased waste is not anticipated to be large. Many Master Plan projects focus on
infrastructure improvements that would not result in significant new users (incorporation of
sustainable practices in the maintenance and management of parks, improvement of
landscaping with sustainable plantings or native planting providing wildlife habitat, repaving
trails).
The potential new major park projects identified in the Master Plan, such as a new aquatic
facility, gym or performing arts center would create an increase in solid waste generation.
However, the increase would be reflective of the population using the facility and would not
induce population growth on its own; rather, the goal of the Master Plan is to provide improved
recreational facilities for the existing and projected population of Cupertino. Thus, while adoption
of the Master Plan could potentially increase solid waste generation due to increased uses of
recreational facilities, it would not be in substantial amounts that would be in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local landfill, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals. This impact would be less than significant.
e) Comply with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
No impact. The City contracts for municipal waste disposal services according to all federal
state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Implementation of future park
projects and improvements envisioned in the Master Plan would be required to comply with all
relevant regulations pertaining to solid waste. The City would ensure that all park projects
comply with the City of Cupertino Zero Waste Policy and would recover and divert at least 65%
of the construction waste generated by the project. No impact would occur.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 217
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.20 WILDFIRE
Is the project located near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones? Yes No
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to
the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
3.20.1 Environmental Setting
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire) maps areas of significant
fire hazards in the state. These areas are identified based on weather, terrain, fuels, and other
factors. There is a small area of Very High Fire Severity located at the southern edge of the
City, in the vicinity of Upland Way, where the Fremont Older Open Space Preserve crosses the
boundary of the City (City of Cupertino 2014b). A larger area of High Fire Severity exists in the
sparsely populated western reaches of the City. A map of the fire severity zones in the City is
included as Figure 3.20-1 Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
CalFire also designates land as either a State or Local Responsibility Area (SRA and LRA) to
designate who has financial responsibility for the prevention and suppression of wildfire (the
state or a local municipality or special service district). The City of Cupertino has the
responsibility for fighting wildland fires within the City limits. The unincorporated area to the west
of the City in Santa Clara County is a State Responsibility Area.
None of the parks or recreational facilities included in the Master Plan is within or near lands
classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ). However, a number of parks are
located within a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (HFHSZ). These include Little Rancho Park,
Canyon Oak Park, Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center, and Linda Vista Park. These parks
are all within the more lightly populated western side of the City.
City Boundary
Very High Fire Hazard
High Fire HazardT:\CASE\Env\20288_01CupertinoParksMasterPlanCEQA\GIS\MXDs\Wildfire_20190909.mxd9/9/2019Source: Source: ESRI, 2017; California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, 2007; MIG, Inc, 2019
City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Plan
0 0.5 10.25 Mile K
Figure 3.20-1 Fire Hazard Severity Zones
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 219
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Both Little Rancho Park and Canyon Oak Park are in the north western tip of the City and are
located near a state responsibility area (SRA) at a distance of 650 feet and 2000 feet,
respectively.
There are three fire stations in the City, operated by operated by the Santa Clara County Fire
Department, serving as fire protection for the City and nearby unincorporated areas (SCCFD
2019).
3.20.2 Regulatory Setting
State Regulations
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
CalFire has mapped fire threat potential throughout California. CalFire ranks fire threat based on
the availability of fuel and the likelihood of an area burning (based on topography, fire history,
and climate). The rankings include no fire threat and moderate, high, and very high fire threat.
Additionally, CalFire produced a 2010 Strategic Fire Plan for California that contains goals,
objectives, and policies to prepare for and mitigate the effects of fire on California’s natural and
built environments. CalFire’s Office of the State Fire Marshal provides oversight of enforcement
of the California Fire Code as well as overseeing hazardous liquid pipeline safety.
California Fire Code
The California Fire Code (CFC) is Part 9 of Title 24. Updated every three years, the CFC
includes provisions and standards for emergency planning and preparedness, fire service
features, fire protection systems, hazardous materials, fire flow requirements, fire hydrant
locations and distribution, and the clearance of debris and vegetation within a prescribed
distance from occupied structures in wildlife hazard areas. The Santa Clara County Fire
Department provides fire protection services for the City as well as in Campbell, Los Altos, Los
Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Saratoga, and other unincorporated areas. The Fire
Department implements and enforces the CFC in Cupertino.
California Strategic Fire Plan
In 2010, the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection issued the California Strategic Fire
Plan, a statewide fire plan developed in concert between the State Board of Forestry and Fire
Protection and CalFire. Goals included improved availability and use of information on hazard
and risk assessment, land use planning, development of shared vision in plans such as
Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPs), establishment of fire resistance in assets at risk,
shared vision among fire protection jurisdictions and agencies, levels of suppression, and post-
fire recovery. In support of this plan, several policies are noted, including creation of defensible
space, improving home fire resistance, fuel hazard reduction that creates resilient landscapes
and protects wildland and natural resources, adequate and appropriate fire suppression, and
commitment by individuals and communities to wildfire prevention and protection through local
planning.
Regional Locations
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Firefighting and emergency medical services are provided to the City by the Santa Clara County
Fire Department (SCCFD). SCCFD is a full-service department that provides similar services to
seven other West Valley cities and adjacent county areas. Mutual aid agreements with the
neighboring jurisdictions augment SCCFD’s fire response capabilities.
Santa Clara County Emergency Operation Plan
The Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services (OES) has adopted an Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP), which identifies hazards, incidents, events, and emergencies believed
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 220
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
to be important to the operational area. It is applicable to a wide variety of anticipated incident
events, including wildland fires. As part of the EOP, Fire agencies in the county have signed a
countywide mutual aid agreement to ensure firefighting resources and personnel will be
available to combat wildland / urban interface fires. If these resources within the county are not
enough to meet the threat, fire resources from throughout California can be summoned under
the State’s Master Mutual Aid Agreement administered by the Cal OES. All fire agencies in
Santa Clara County have signed the California Master Mutual Aid Agreement and participate in
mutual aid operations as required.
Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan
This CWPP is a countywide strategic plan with goals for creating a safer wildland urban
interface community, accompanied by report annexes that address specific issues and projects
by jurisdiction and stakeholder organizations to meet the strategic goals. The purpose of the
CWPP is to assist in protecting human life and reducing property loss due to wildfire throughout
the planning area.
Cupertino Emergency Plan
State law requires cities to prepare an emergency plan in order to effectively respond to natural
or human-caused disasters that threaten lives, the natural environment or property. The
Cupertino Emergency Plan establishes an organizational framework to enable the City to
manage its emergency response activities and to coordinate with County, State and Federal
agencies. The Emergency Plan was prepared in accordance with the National Incident
Management System (NIMS) and is used in conjunction with the State Emergency Plan, the
Santa Clara Operational Disaster Response and Recovery Area Interim Agreement, Santa
Clara County Emergency Plan, as well as plans and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of
contract agencies and special districts. Support personnel such as City staff, special districts
and volunteer groups are trained to perform specific functions in the Emergency Operations
Center. The plan is reviewed annually and tested through periodic emergency disaster drills.
3.20.3 Discussion
Would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire
risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability,
or drainage changes?
No Impact. (Impacts a-d). Of the two parks that are near a State Responsible Area (Little
Rancho Park, and Canyon Oak Park), neither has any improvements identified under the
Master Plan, and there would be no requirement for the installation of associated infrastructure.
Implementation of the Master Plan enhancement opportunities would not change the existing
conditions in a VHFHSZ or in/near an SRA, and therefore would not exacerbate wildfire risks,
and would not expose people or structures to significant risk from wildfire.
The two additional parks in a HFHSZ (Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center, and Linda Vista
Park), have more substantial potential improvements identified, such as the renovation or
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 221
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
replacement of the existing buildings at Monta Vista, and the addition of a picnic shelter or
pavilion, a destination nature play and/or water play area, and potentially including adventure or
challenge elements at Linda Vista. Enhancement opportunities to these parks would not
exacerbate wildfire risks or expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire.
Enhancement opportunities to these parks would not require the installation of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment because they are located in an already urbanized areas with urban infrastructure in
place.
Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center is located in a relatively flat area of the City and if there
were a wildland fire, the project would not increase exposure of people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes.
Linda Vista is located in fairly steep terrain and any future improvements would need to be
evaluated for potential to exacerbate wildland fire risk. Once project-level information is
developed for enhancement opportunities at Linda Vista Park, the City would evaluate the
project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether
subsequent environmental review is required.
The Master Plan would not interfere with either the Cupertino or Santa Clara County Emergency
Plans. Nor would it change existing conditions to exacerbate wildfire risks beyond those that are
currently present.
Implementation of the project would not expose people to a significant risk as a result of wildfire,
because wildfire risk would remain at the current level. Therefore, projects implementing the
Master Plan would have no impact on wildfire risks.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 222
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a)Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b)Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with
the efforts of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
c)Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
3.21.1 Discussion
a)Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less Than Significant with Mitigation. The adoption of the Parks and Recreation System
Master Plan would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Impacts to all resource
areas except aesthetics (light and glare), biological resources, cultural resources, and tribal
resources have been found to be less than significant because all Master Plan projects would
be designed and implemented consistent with the General Plan, Municipal Code, and all
relevant regional, state, and federal regulations related to the protection of the environment and
natural resources. The City would require implementation of standard construction measures
per the City’s contract language as described in Section 2.9.
Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or the construction
of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and implementation
information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the project to
determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether subsequent
environmental review is required.
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 223
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Potential light and glare impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through
implementation of AES-1. Several special-status species or sensitive habitats occur or have the
potential to occur on or near existing parks. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 identified in this IS/MND
would reduce the impacts of future park projects on sensitive habitats and special-status
species to less than significant levels.
Construction of the identified Master Plan enhancement opportunities could impact unknown
cultural and/or tribal resources. The General Plan, Municipal Code, and construction contract
language requirements would ensure projects are planned, designed, and constructed in a
manner that would avoid significant impacts on cultural and/or tribal resources. The City would
incorporate standard construction measures in the City’s contract language (see discussion in
Section 2.9), which will ensure that proper protocols are followed if cultural resources or tribal
resources are discovered during construction. Mitigation Measure CULT-1, which is identified in
this IS/MND, would ensure that if previously undiscovered cultural resources are encountered
during construction they are protected and appropriately catalogued and preserved. The
adoption and implementation of the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan would have a
less than significant impact on these resources. As a result, the project would not eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the efforts of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
Less Than Significant. Most of the projects identified under the Master Plan would not
contribute to cumulative impacts in connection with past projects nor with the effects of other
current projects or probable future projects. As described in the Project Description, many of the
projects and improvements are small in nature and limited in scope and would not contribute to
cumulative impacts. These projects may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Improving walking trails with parks;
• Adding shade to existing parks;
• Replacing/Improving play equipment;
• Removal/replacement of existing picnic tables;
• Construction of new restrooms or other small structures in parks;
• Incorporation of sustainable practices in the maintenance and management of parks;
• Improvement of landscaping with sustainable plantings or native planting providing wildlife
habitat,
• Improvements that may assist the City in meeting or exceeding Americans with Disabilities
Act requirements;
• Improvement of trail connections and access;
• Development of fitness areas in parks;
• Integration of nature into parks;
• Enhancement of seating areas in parks;
• Enhancement of existing sports fields (excluding field lighting, additional evening events,
or increase in spectators);
• Creation of wayfinding signage or safe routes to parks;
• Replacing, renovating, or repurposing buildings within the parks and recreation system.
Table 2-4 presents opportunities for new parks and for potential major new features such as an
aquatics facility, a gymnasium and multi-use recreation facility, performing arts center, or senior
center expansion. Adoption of the Master Plan would not authorize any specific development, or
the construction of park improvements contemplated in the Master Plan. Once design and
Environmental Checklist and Responses Page 224
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
implementation information become available for specific projects, the City would evaluate the
project to determine if its impacts are covered by this programmatic IS/MND or whether
subsequent environmental review is required, and the potential cumulative impacts of these
larger project would be evaluated at that time.
c)Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant. Individual projects carried out under the Master Plan would be planned,
designed, constructed, and operated in conformance with relevant federal and state regulations,
as well as adopted City regulations, policy, and plans. Relevant regulations and policies are
described throughout this IS/MND and would work to ensure projects would not have substantial
adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. For example, the City requires
stormwater pollution prevention and watershed protection, stream resource protections, erosion
and sediment control, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 9.18, 9.19 and 16.18. Compliance
with the regulatory and Municipal Code requirements protecting surface and water quality
ensure the project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Additionally, the City has
developed standard measures or BMPs that are required to be included in construction bid
documents and construction contracts that outline the City’s requirements for storm water runoff
management, storm drain protection from road work, fresh concrete, and paints/solvents.
Additionally, park projects would be designed and constructed according to the measures listed
in Table 2-5. Conformance with federal, state and local regulations related to air quality, traffic
management, and energy use would ensure that significant greenhouse gas emission impacts
do not occur. Conformance with the City’s Noise Ordinance would ensure construction noise
does not cause significant noise impacts. All projects would be designed in conformance with
City policy and the Municipal Code.
The primary goals of the Master Plan are to enhance the existing park and recreation
infrastructure to ensure the park system will meet the needs of the Cupertino community, and to
guide the City in allocating resources for future development, renovation, and management of
City parks. Mitigation measures adopted and incorporated into the project will ensure that
implementation of the Master Plan does not have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
References Page 225
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Chapter 4. References
Alta Planning & Design. June 2016. City of Cupertino 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Cupertino, CA. Adopted June 2016.
American Legal Publishing Corporation. 2019. City of Cupertino, California Municipal Code.
February 5, 2019. Accessed March 12, 2019, March 18, 2019, and April 3, 2019 at
http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/?f=templates&fn=default.htm.
______2019. Cupertino Municipal Code: S-70 Supplement contains: Local legislation current
through ordinance 18-2181, passed 12-4-2018.
http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/cupertino/cityofcupertinocaliforniamu
nicipalcode?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:cupertino_ca
Basin, 2006. Cultural Resources Assessment Including Results of Presence/Absence
Archaeological Testing - Revised, Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan, City of
Cupertino, Santa Clara County.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD).2015. Bay Area Emissions Inventory
Summary Report: Greenhouse Gases Base Year 2011. San Francisco, CA. January
2015.
______2017a. “Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status”. BAAQMD, Research & Data, Air
Quality Standards & Attainment Status. January 5, 2017. Accessed March 2019.
http://www.baaqmd.gov/research-and-data/air-quality-standards-and-attainment-status
______2017b. 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate. BAAQMD, Planning,
Rules, and Research Division. April 19, 2017.
______2017c. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. San Francisco, CA.
June 2010, updated May 2017.
______2018. Revised 2013 CARE Communities Map. San Francisco, CA. January 25, 2018.
______2018b. SB 375 Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets. Adopted
March 22, 2018. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/sustainable-communities-
program/regional-plan-targets.
______2019a. Planning Healthy Places Interactive Map. Web. Accessed March 2019.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9b240e706e6545e0996be
9df227a5b8c&extent=-122.5158,37.5806,-122.0087,37.8427
______2019b. “Current Rules”. BAAQMD, Rules and Compliance. June 20, 2017. Accessed
March 2019. http://www.baaqmd.gov/rules-and-compliance/current-rules
Beier, P. and S. Loe. 1992. A Checklist for Evaluating Impacts to Wildlife Movement Corridors.
Wildlife Society Bulletin 20(4):434-440.
______. and R.F. Noss. 1998. Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? Conservation Biology
12(6):1241-1252.
California Air Resources Board 2017. 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Sacramento, CA.
December 2017.
______. 2018a. California Greenhouse Gas Emission by Scoping Plan Category (2018 Edition:
2000 to 2016). Sacramento, CA. June 22, 2018.
California Department of Conservation. 2002. Accessed January 16, 2019 at
http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Maps/CUPERTINO_EZRIM.pdf
References Page 226
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
______. 2010. Fault Activity Map of California. Accessed January 16, 2019 at
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/metadata/GDM_006_FAM_750k_v2_metadata.ht
ml
______.2016. California Important Farmland Finder. Accessed January 17, 2018.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/.
______. 2018. “SMARA Statutes & Associated Regulations.” Accessed on January 17, 2019.
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dmr/lawsandRegulations.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Environmental Services Division (ESD).
1994. A Field Guide to Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreements, Sections 1600-
1607, California Fish and Game Code.
______. 2019a. California Natural Diversity Database. Accessed January 22, 2019. Available at:
https://map.dfg.ca.gov/rarefind/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2frarefind%2fview%2fRareFind.
aspx.
______. 2019b. California Sensitive Natural Communities. Accessed January 22, 2019.
Available at: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=153609&inline.
______. 2018. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant
Populations and Communities. March 20, 2018. Available at:
http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/survey_monitor.html.
______. 1988-1990. Life history accounts for species in the California Wildlife Habitat
Relationships (CWHR) System. Originally published in: Zeiner, D.C., W.F. Laudenslayer,
Jr., K.E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988-1990. California's Wildlife. Vol. I-III.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Branch. 2015. Private
Timberlands and Public Lands in Northern California. January 13, 2015
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2010. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste
and Substances Site List- Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Accessed January 29, 2019.
https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm
______. 2019a. EnviroStor. Accessed January 24, 2019.
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
______. 2019b. GeoTracker. Accessed January 24, 2019.
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2018. Scenic Highways. Accessed January
28, 2019. http://www.dot.ca.gov/design/lap/livability/scenic-highways/index.html.
Updated August 2, 2018.
______. 2013a. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Sacramento,
California. September 2013.
______. 2013b. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol.
Sacramento, California. September 2013.
California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD). 2001. California Division of Safety of Dams Fault
Activity Guidelines. Accessed January 16, 2019 at https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-
Website/Web-Pages/Programs/All-Programs/Division-of -safety-of -dams/Files/Technical-
Reference-docs/DSOD-Technical-References/California-Division-of-Safety-Of-Dams-
Fault-Activity-Guidelines---DSOD-Technical-References.pdf
California Energy Commission (CEC) 2015. 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report. Sacramento,
CA. 2015.
References Page 227
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
______. 2019a. “Electricity Consumption by County.” Electricity Consumption by County. CEC,
Energy Consumption Database. n.d. Web. February 5, 2019.
http://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx.
_____. 2019b. “Gas Consumption by County.” Gas Consumption by County. CEC, Energy
Consumption Database. n.d. Web. February 5, 2019.
http://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx.
California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), San Francisco Bay Regional Water
Quality Control Board. Basin Planning: Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) for the
San Francisco Bay Area. Accessed January 18, 2019.
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb2/basin_planning.html
California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2001. Botanical Survey Guidelines. California Native
Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Accessed January 25, 2019. Available at:
http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/pdf/cnps_survey_guidelines.pdf.
______. 2019. Rare Plant Program. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California
(online edition, v8-03.39). Accessed January 22, 2019. Available at:
http://www.rareplants.cnps.org.
California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating
Transportation Impacts in CEQA. December. Accessed on September 4, 2019 at
http://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf.
Cal Recycle. Mandatory Commercial Recycling. Updated November 21, 2018. Accessed
January 1, 2019. Available at https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/recycle/commercial.
City of Cupertino. 2014a. Americans with Disabilities Act Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.
Draft. December. Accessed March 13, 2019 at:
https://www.cupertino.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=9181.
______. 2014b. Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) for the General Plan
Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning Project (State
Clearinghouse No. 2014032007), certified on December 4, 2014. An Addendum to the
Final EIR was adopted on Oct. 20, 2015 and a Second Addendum was adopted on
August 20, 2019. Cupertino, CA. 2014
______. 2015a. Climate Action Plan. Cupertino, CA. January.
______. 2015b. Cupertino General Plan: Community Vision 2015-2040 (General Plan). Adopted
October. Amended October 20, 2015 by Ordinance Number CC 15-087.
______. 2016. Bicycle Transportation Plan Update Project Initial Study. Cupertino, CA. May
2016
______. 2017a. 2017 Climate Action Plan Progress Report & GHG Inventory Update. Prepared
by City of Cupertino Sustainability Division. Cupertino, CA. 2017.
______. 2017b. Zero Waste Policy. Resolution No. 17-2249. Adopted December 19, 2017.
______. 2018a. Junipero Serra Trail Feasibility Study. Cupertino, CA. As Amended and
Adopted by City Council on May 21, 2019.
______. 2018b. Land Use Map. Adopted November 15, 2005. Cupertino, CA. Amended
September 19, 2018.
______. 2018c. McClellan Ranch Parking Area Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Cupertino, CA. June 2018
______. 2018d. Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Final Report. Cupertino, CA, February 2018
References Page 228
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
______.2018e. Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan Project Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration. Cupertino, CA., January 2018
______. 2018f. Regnart Creek Trail Feasibility Study. Cupertino, CA. September 2018
______. 2018G.Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Cupertino, CA. 2018
______. 2019a. Cupertino Library. Accessed January 17, 2019. Available
athttps://www.cupertino.org/residents/cupertino-library.
______. 2019b.Emergency Alerts and Communications. Accessed January 17, 2019. Available
at https://www.cupertino.org/residents/community-services-programs/emergency-
preparedness/cupertino-alert-system.
______. 2019c. Emergency Services. Accessed January 17, 2019. Available at
https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/community-services-programs/emergency-services.
______. 2019d. Fire. Accessed January 1, 2019. Available at https://www.cupertino.org/our-
city/departments/public-safety/fire.
______. 2019e. Garbage and Recycling. Accessed January 1, 2019. Available at
https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/environment-sustainability/waste.
______. 2019f. Geographic Information Systems. Accessed January 22, 2019.
https://www.cupertino.org/online-services/open-government-data/city-maps
______. 2019g. History. Accessed January 24, 2019. https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/about-
cupertino/history
______. 2019h. Schools. Accessed January 17, 2019. Available at
https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/schools.
______. 2019i. Sheriff’s Office. Accessed January 1, 2019. Available at
https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/community-services-programs/sheriff-s-office.
______. 2019j. Draft Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan. September 3, 2019
City of San Jose. 2016. Planning Commission Staff Report. File No. PD14-014. Revised
December 24, 2016. Accessed January 1, 2019. Available at
http://www.sanjoseca.gov/Document Center/View/61587.
City of San Jose. 2016 San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility Fact Sheet.
Updated April 25, 2016.
Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD). Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). Prepared by Mark
Thomas. Certified May 18, 2016.
Cupertino Union School District. 2019. Neighborhood Schools. Accessed January 17, 2019.
Available at https://www.cusdk8.org/domain/97.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical
Report Y- 87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi. January. 100 pp. plus appendices.
Federal Air Authority. 2019. Airport/Facility Directory.
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/search/results/?c
ycle=1901&state=CA&sort=city&dir=asc&page=2
Field, E.H. and Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP). 2014 and
2015. UCERF3: A new earthquake forecast for California’s complex fault system: U.S.
Geological Survey 2015–3009, 6 p. Accessed January 16, 2019.
https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/fs20153009
References Page 229
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD). Our Schools. Accessed January 17, 2019.
Available athttps://www.fuhsd.org/our-schools.
Google Earth. 2019. Image Land Sat Copernicus. Accessed January 24, 2019.
http://www.earth.google.com
Holland, R. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.
California Department of Fish and Game.
Kroeber, A.L. 1976. Handbook of the Indians of California, New York. Dover Publications, Inc.
Levy, Richard. 1987. Costanoan in R.F. Heizer (ed.) Handbook of North American Indians. Vol.
8: California: 485-495. Washington D.C. Smithsonian Institute.
LSA Associates. 2013. Apple Campus 2 Project Public Review Draft Environmental Impact
Report.
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. 2018. Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve
Map. May 29, 2018.
National Hazardous Materials Route Registry. 2019. California. Accessed January 24, 2019.
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?hl=en_US&app=mp&mid=1Yyz6yA9I9I5DQ5Gb
2U1X7f_8enM&ll=37.56258215824642%2C-122.14133765221697&z=12
National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service. 2018. Accessed August 9, 2018 and
January 22, 2019. https://www.nps.gov/nR/index.htm
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service. 2005.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Endangered and Threatened Species:
Final Listing Determinations for 10 Distinct Population Segments of West Coast
Steelhead; Final Rule. 50 CFR Part 17 Vol. 70 (170): 52488- 52627. September 2.
Netroline. 2018. Historic Aerials. Accessed January 22, 2019.
https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer
Office of Historic Preservation, California State Parks. 2018. Accessed August 9, 2018 and
January 22, 2019. http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/
Office of Historic Preservation, Listed Historic Resources. 2019. Accessed March7,
2019http://www.ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/?view=county&criteria=43
Old Maps Online. 2018, Bay of San Francisco (David Rumsey Collection). Accessed January
22, 2019. http://www.oldmapsonline.org/map/rumsey/5806.002
Office of Planning and Research. 2017. State of California General Plan Guidelines.
Sacramento. 2017.
Recology South Bay. Cupertino 2017-2018 Service Guide. Accessed January 1, 2019. Available
at https://www.cupertino.org/home/showdocument?id=4118.
San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2019. Municipal Stormwater Program.
Accessed January 23, 2019 at
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sanfranciscobay/water_issues/programs/stormwater/Mu
nicipal/index.html.
Santa Clara County. 2016. Airport Land Use Commission Comprehensive Land Use Plan, San
Jose International Airport. Accessed January 24, 2019.
https://www.sccgov.org/sites/dpd/DocsForms/Documents/ALUC_SJC_CLUP.pdf
______. 2016. Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Accessed March 11,
2019.
References Page 230
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
http://www.sccfd.org/images/documents/fire_prevention/CWPP/CWPP_Strategic_Count
ywide_Document_08_29_16.pdf
______. 2017. Emergency Operations Plan. Accessed March 11, 2019.
https://www.sccgov.org/sites/oes/partners/Documents/Santa-Clara-County-OES-
Emergency-Operations-Plan-2017-01.pdf
Santa Clara County Fire Department. 2017 Annual Report.
______. 2019. Fire Station Locations. Accessed January 29, 2019. http://www.sccfd.org/about-
sccfd/fire-station-locations
Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2008. Blackberry Farm Stream Rehabilitation Fish Salvage
Field Report.
______. 2014. Stream Maintenance Program Update 2014-2023: Best Management Practices.
______. 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. May 2016. Accessed January 18, 2019.
https://www.valleywater.org/your-water/water-supply-planning/urban-water-
management-plan,
______2016. Groundwater Management Plan. Accessed January 18, 2019 at https://s3.us-
west-
2.amazonaws.com/assets.valleywater.org/2016%20Groundwater%20Management%20
Plan.pdf.
Santa Clara Valley Water Resources Protection Collaborative. 2006. Guidelines and Standards
for Land Use Near Streams: A Manual of Tools, Standards, and Procedures to Protect
Streams and Streamside Resources in Santa Clara County.
Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J. Evans. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation 2nd
edition. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA.
McCracken, T. 2019. Associate Principal, Placeworks. Personal Email Communication. March
12, 2019.
Shuford, W.D. and T. Gardali, Editors. 2008. California bird species of special concern: a ranked
assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate
conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field
Ornithologists, Camarillo, CA, and California Department of Fish and Game,
Sacramento, CA.
Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE). 2018. “About SVCE.” Accessed on January 17, 2019.
Available at https://www.svcleanenergy.org/faqs#1518148602266-b9fa5ee4-68ab.
Sokale, Jana. 2002. Pre-Print Final Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Report.
Sunnyvale Clean Water Program (SCWP). “Wastewater Facts and Figures.” 2018. Accessed
January 1, 2019. Available at http://www.sunnyvalecleanwater.com/wastewater-facts-
and-figures.
Toole Design Group. February 2018. City of Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Adopted
February 20, 2018 by Ordinance Number 18-015.
TRA Environmental Sciences. 2011. Stevens Creek Corridor Park and Restoration Phase 2
Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration.
United States Census Bureau. 2019. Quick Facts: Cupertino City, California; United States.
Accessed September 13, 2019 at
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/cupertinocitycalifornia,US/PST045218.
References Page 231
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Information for Planning and
Consultation (IPaC). Accessed February 13, 2019. Available at:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac.
______. 2002. General Rare Plant Survey Guidelines. Accessed January 25, 2019. Available
online at https://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/survey-protocols-
guidelines/Documents/rare_plant_protocol.pdf.
______. Forest Legacy Assessment Project. Accessed January 17, 2018.
https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9d083b89bd2
54c23acf56f8143e0c119.
USGS 2013, Shaking Hazard Map. Accessed January 16, 2019
http://resilience.abag.ca.gov/earthquakes/
______. 2015a. Earthquake Outlook for the San Francisco Bay Region 2014–2043. Accessed
January 16, 2019 at https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2016/3020/fs20163020.pdf
______. 2015b.A New Earthquake Forecast for California’s Complex Fault System.
https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2015/3009/pdf/fs2015-3009.pdf
______. 2017.Land Subsidence: Cause & Effect. Accessed January 16, 2019 at
https://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-cause-effect.html
______. 2019a. Active Fault. Accessed January 16, 2019 at
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/glossary/?term=active%20fault
______. 2019b USGS Maps. Accessed January 16, 2019 at
https://usgs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5a6038b3a1684561a9
b0aadf88412fcf
U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 2010. “Construction Noise Handbook, Chapter 9
Construction Equipment Noise Levels and Ranges.” U.S. Department of Transportation
FHWA. August 24, 2017. Accessed April 1, 2018 at:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook09.cf
m
WRA Environmental Consultants. 2011. Biological Resources Assessment Lehigh Permanente
Quarry.
References Page 232
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page is intentionally left blank.
List of Preparers Page 233
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
Chapter 5. List of Preparers
Lead Agency
City of Cupertino
Public Works Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Contact: Gail Seeds, Park Improvement Manager
City of Cupertino
Department of Public W orks
Email: parksmp@cupertino.org
(408) 777-3120
Prepared by:
MIG, Inc.
2635 North 1st Street, Suite 149
San Jose, CA 95134
(650) 327-0429
Report Preparers:
Barbara Beard, Senior Project Manager
Christina Lau, Deputy Project Manager
Taylor Peterson, Senior Biologist
David Gallagher, Senior Biologist
Chris Dugan, Senior Analyst
Robert Templar, Senior Archaeologist/Analyst
Shelby Kendrick, Analyst
Lauren Huff, Senior Biologist
List of Preparers Page 234
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan Project City of Cupertino
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page is intentionally left blank.
APPENDIX A
Master Plan Appendix F:
Opportunities and Costs
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedImmediate: Engage the public in developing a site master plan for Memorial Park as a community hub and multi-use, civic-focused event
space. Include the presence of Quinlan Community Center, Senior Center, Sports Center in planning Memorial Park as a community
space. Consider repurposing the inactive pond, renovating the amphitheater, adding walking path improvements and playable water
feature, enhancing the tree canopy, integrating natural features, and renovating, adding and/or expanding recreation facilities to
enhance indoor and outdoor event space, community gathering space, active/healthy recreation uses and play opportunities. Clarify the
role of memorials at this site, addressing opportunities to make a community-building statement and/or tribute to community cohesiveness. √√
Short term: Implement Phase 1 improvements in the pond/amphitheater area. Consider nature integration, shade, ADA accessibility,
pathway and seating improvements, amphitheater improvements, pond re-purposing, and other elements consistent with the site master
plan process. √√√
Longer term: Phase in additional improvements, based on the site master plan, including improvements to existing facilities, development
of any selected major new facilities, and the addition of recreation opportunities. Pending the site master plan, this may potentially include
major facilities such as an aquatic facility, gymnasium/recreation center, senior center expansion and/or a potential performing/fine arts
center at this site, or as an expansion of an adjacent recreation building that would affect this site (Sports Center, Senior Center e.g.), as
well as the addition or repurposing of facilities. Provide connections to proposed trails, bike lanes and bike routes.√√√√
Immediate: Complete the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.√√
Short term: Phase in improvements as guided by the site master plan, enhancing natural/habitat areas and facilities supporting
environmental education, gatherings and recreation uses, while retaining the natural character of the park. Provide connections to any
extension of the Stevens Creek Trail & nearby bikeways. Provide trailhead amenities. Stabilize east creek bank at 22050 Stevens Creek Blvd.
per results of the concept design project, using methods similar to those employed in upstream restoration. Complete feasibility work & if
approved pursue implementation of improved pedestrian & bicycle access to Blackberry Farm Park via San Fernando Ave. Evaluate steps
for expanded use of Blackberry Farm.√√√
Longer term: Implement renovation of Stocklmeir Ranch, Blackberry Farm Golf Course, Blackberry Farm Park, and/ or McClellan Ranch
Preserve and West and other corridor parcels, consistent with the recommendations of the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan.√√√√
Short term: Consider adding nature play and/or inclusive play elements to the existing play area. Consider other enhancements to outdoor
recreation diversity. Evaluate opportunities to enhance the recreation building and reactivate or repurpose the concession area. Sustain
existing uses. √
Longer term: Coordinate with results of Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment to modify the recreation building as needed.
Refresh sports fields to maintain site use as a sports hub. Consider artificial turf or other enhancements to increase the playing capacity.
Consider adding a full basketball court, other sports courts, and diverse recreation elements to support sports and active uses. Provide
trailhead amenities and connections to existing/proposed off-street trail and proposed buffered bike lane.√√√√√
Short term: Sustain existing uses. √√
Longer term: Consider adding a community garden and diverse recreation elements. Consider providing a larger/full-size basketball court.
Consider a looped walking path and restrooms.√√√
22.1
63.7
Creekside Park
Site
City Parks and Facilities
Community hub and multi-use, civic-
focused event space
Community-focused natural area
supporting environmental education,
outdoor gathering and recreation
consistent with protecting wildlife and
habitat value
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub
COMMUNITY PARKS
LARGE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
13.0
Table F-1: Site Opportunities for Parks & School Fields Managed by City
Hoover Park Neighborhood park and recreation and
sports space
Memorial Park
Stevens Creek Corridor Park
5.0
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedSite
Short term: Pursue adding an all-inclusive play area, grouped seating, a picnic shelter, continuous all-weather loop path (that includes the
east part of the park), and neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure. Sustain existing uses. Respond to community request for
trial off-leash dog area.√√√√
Longer term: Consider additional diverse amenities, such as outdoor fitness equipment/parcourse or a full-size basketball court. Provide
connections to bikeway improvements on Stelling Rd. Consider for location of development of major new facilities.√√√
Short term: Select design concept to repair or repurpose the inactive ponds. Sustain existing uses. √
Longer term: Repair or renovate the ponds (per 2014 technical report). Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and
infrastructure, a picnic shelter or pavilion, a destination nature play and/or water play area, and diverse recreation elements, potentially
including adventure and challenge elements. Consider a community or demonstration, healing or rain garden. Provide trailhead amenities
and connections to the proposed off-street trail. Consider installing outdoor exercise equipment in addition to, or as replacement for,
existing parcourse equipment.√√√√
Short term: In conjunction with major facility business plans, if pursued, explore opportunities to relocate or expand the gymnastics/martial
arts & preschool programs to other facilities. Consider temporary options to expand play opportunities near the preschool. Consider
restriping tennis court(s) to share for pickleball. Sustain existing uses.√√
Longer term: Address renovation or replacement of the existing multi-use and preschool buildings based on major facility
recommendations and in coordination with Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Consider adding a half or full basketball
court, picnic shelter, neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure, and other diverse recreation elements. Provide connections to
proposed buffered bikeway.√√√√√
Short term: Improve walkway lighting and signage. Explore options to share adjacent school parking. Sustain existing uses.√
Longer term: Consider adding shading to the picnic area, grouped seating, nature play area and/or inclusive play elements, and diverse
recreation elements, such as badminton, bocce/lawn bowling, and/or games to support small group gatherings. Improve connections to
the adjacent school. Re-evaluate the location and use of the recreation building, considering relocating the building or the preschool-age
and child programming or adding indoor restrooms, and in coordination with Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Provide
connections to the proposed bike boulevard and adjacent neighborhoods.√√√√
Short term: Consider expanding or replacing play area with nature play area and/or thematic or inclusive play elements. Consider
restriping tennis court(s) to share for pickleball. Consider other enhancements for outdoor recreation diversity. Sustain existing uses.√√√
Longer term: Consider diverse recreation elements focused on passive uses and nature education. Consider community garden, outdoor
classroom, pollinator patches and interpretive signage. Maintain connections to adjacent school. Provide trailhead amenities and
connections to proposed bikeway.√√√
Short term: Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and infrastructure, picnic shelter, and a large/full-size basketball court.
Sustain existing uses.√√√
Longer term: Evaluate use of and desirability of renovating/replacing the ceramics building, particularly if ceramics can be incorporated
into a fine arts or recreation facility, and in coordination with Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment. Consider a wider,
maintenance-friendly loop path, community garden, variety of sports courts, activity hubs, and diverse recreation elements, including
those that provide challenge elements. Consider full-size basketball court. Provide trailhead amenities and connections to nearby
bikeways and proposed off-street trail. If desired, a sport field can fit on the east portion of the site (with relocation of the central play area
and picnicking reconfiguration).√√√√√
Varian Park 6.3
11.2
Linda Vista Park 11.0
Neighborhood and community hub for
sports, recreation and activities
Jollyman Park Neighborhood and community hub for
sports, recreation programs and activities
Neighborhood recreation and sports hub
Portal Park
Neighborhood and community hub for
picnicking and nature-based recreation
Neighborhood park and gathering space
Neighborhood park with tennis, passive
recreation, orchard and habitat focus
9.9
6.2
3.8
Wilson Park
Monta Vista Park & Recreation Center
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedSite
Canyon Oak Park 0.6 Play node for local use Short and longer term: Maintain orientation to the view of open space. Sustain existing uses. √√
Franco Park 0.6 Neighborhood park Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses. Consider adding shade and small group seating area. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access
from Franco Court; evaluate possible on-street parking and crosswalk to Franco Court access point.√√
Little Rancho Park 0.3 Play node for local use Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses.√
Short term: Sustain existing uses. √
Longer term: Consider adding a community garden, dog area, and/ or larger basketball area or other amenities. Provide trailhead
amenities and connections to the De Anza Trail if it is implemented. √√√
Sterling Barnhart Park 0.5 Play node with trail connection Short and longer term: Sustain existing uses. Consider effects of an extension of Saratoga Creek Trail or the acquisition of Lawrence-Mitty
property, if pursued. √√
Short term: Sustain existing uses. √
Longer term: Look to address successional tree plantings to maintain character. Consider adding nature play area and/or inclusive
elements and repurposing or improving the southeasterly rock play area. Consider adding neighborhood-serving event utilities and
infrastructure, and diversifying recreation opportunities.√√√
Civic Center
Civic Center Plaza/Community
Hall 1.0 Short and longer term: Evaluate Civic Center Master Plan in relation to major new facility discussions to clarify use of Civic Center and
adjacent areas. Sustain existing uses in the short term.√√√
Short term: Sustain existing uses pending decision on implementation of Civic Center Master Plan and cricket field long-term location.
Consider creating a separate parcel for Library Field and rezoning it as PR zoning (park and recreation). √
Longer term: Consider the addition of major facilities, relocation of cricket field if a better site is identified, and long-term options as civic
center-related event space or permanent green space. Consider whether adjacent parking can be put underground to expand Library
Field & green space.√√√√√
Mary Avenue Dog Park 0.5 Dog park and gathering site for dog
owners/friends Short and longer term: Enhance existing use. Consider adding shade, varied terrain, small group seating areas, dog amenities. √√√
Short term: Implement seismic upgrades. Consider implementing improvements to the locker rooms, showers, restrooms, and reception
area as approved in the 2018-19 budget. Revisit site use in the Memorial Park Master Plan and facility business plan associated with the
development of a Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use Recreation Center and/or Aquatics Center, if proposed for Memorial Park, and
consider opportunities for a combined facility. Plan to re-locate the teen center to a different location to optimize teen access and re-
purpose teen area for sport uses.√√
Longer term: Renovate the facility, potentially adding recreation uses compatible with the Memorial Park Master Plan, any related facility
business plan, and Public Works' Facility Condition and Use Assessment.√√√
4.0 Regional connectivity and native
plantings
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school and trail, and regional destinations. Consider improved habitat plantings
that provide year-round beauty and seasonal interest.√√
0.4 Local connectivity, park access and
riparian corridor protection Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities, enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor, and adding green infrastructure. √√
Saratoga Creek Trail 4.7 Regional connectivity and riparian
corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities, enhancing and protecting the riparian corridor, and adding green infrastructure.
Encourage connections to regional destinations.√√
Neighborhood park with nature emphasis
Multi-use civic area for green space,
recreation, and gatherings
Multi-use civic space for gathering and
programming
Library Field 3.0
Cupertino Sports Center 6.2
SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Don Burnett Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge
& Trail
TRAIL CORRIDORS
Indoor/outdoor sports hub
Three Oaks Park 3.1
Somerset Park 1.3 Neighborhood park
Creekside Park and Regnart Creek
Trail
SPECIAL USE SITES
Acres Vision / Park Focus Site Enhancement Opportunities Master Plan/Design ProcessPotential Major Facility DevelopmentPotential Added Recreation FacilitiesPotential Natural Vegetation EnhancementMajor ReinvestmentMinor ReinvestmentAssets Sustained/ReplacedSite
Stevens Creek Trail -Local connectivity, park access and
riparian corridor protection
Short and longer term: Consider adding trail amenities and green infrastructure. Encourage connections between trail, City parks, County
parks and nearby schools. Work with the County to implement a pedestrian-bicycle access to Rancho San Antonio from Stevens Creek
Blvd. with parking/trailhead amenities per the adopted Joint Cities Coordinated Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Study. Continue to
implement habitat restoration and to protect the riparian corridor. Install interpretive signage/ elements including for historical resources.√√
Collins Elementary School 2.5 Sports fields and recreation facilities
Short and longer term: Encourage connections and shared uses between school and Portal Park. Pursue partnerships with School District to
improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to address nearby needs. Encourage connections to proposed bikeways.
Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Eaton Elementary School 4.5 Sports fields and recreation facilities Short and longer term: Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. Encourage
connections to proposed bikeway.√
Faria Elementary School 4.2 Sports fields and recreation facilities Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to
address nearby needs. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Garden Gate Elementary School 2.9 Sports fields and recreation facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities to
address nearby needs. Encourage connections to proposed bikeway. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to
broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Hyde Middle School 7.8 Sports fields and recreation facilities
Short and longer term: Pursue partnerships with School District at Hyde Middle and/or nearby Sedgewick Elementary to improve public
access or to add or enhance recreation facilities. Encourage connections to proposed bikeway. Continue joint-use agreement for sport
field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Kennedy Middle School 13.3 Sports fields, recreation facilities and
trail/school access
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school, proposed De Anza Trail if implemented, and nearby parks. Continue joint-
use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. √
Lincoln Elementary School 3.1 Sports fields and recreation facilities Short and longer term: Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. Encourage
connections to proposed bikeway.√
Regnart Elementary School 4.1 Sports fields, recreation facilities and
trail/school access
Short and longer term: Encourage connections between school, proposed trail if implemented, and nearby parks. Pursue partnerships with
School District to improve public access or to add or enhance recreation facilities. Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use &
explore options to broaden sharing of facilities.√√
Stevens Creek Elementary School 3.1
Sports fields, recreation facilities,
park/school connections, trail/school
access.
Short and longer term: Encourage connections and shared uses between school and Varian Park and connections to proposed bikeway.
Continue joint-use agreement for sport field use & explore options to broaden sharing of facilities. √
SCHOOL FIELDS (currently managed by city)
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****
Short term: Explore joint use agreements with schools
and/or other partners to improve access to existing
facilities especially in underserved areas. Evaluate
opportunities to acquire or partner to develop any
vacant School District parcels. Acquire site(s), or
develop agreements to foster public use of existing or
partner facilities, as opportunities arise. Pursue
acquisition of Lawrence-Mitty parcels on the west side
of Lawrence Expressway. Engage the public in
creating site concepts and develop site(s). Consider
during acquisition whether neighborhood park
guidelines can be met. (Refer to Master Plan
objectives for guidelines for acquisition.) Encourage
creative solutions to providing park and recreation
spaces, including consideration of smaller spaces.
X X X $10-15,000,000/ 3 acre site &
acquisition (about $10M/ acre 2018
estimates)
$$
Longer term: Continue to acquire site(s) as
opportunities arise. Engage public in creating site
concepts and develop site(s). Consider during
acquisition whether neighborhood park guidelines
can be met.
X X X
Short term: Identify project priorities. Explore joint use
agreements with SCVWD that support implementation
of creek trails. Continue to pursue opportunities for
planned trail development. Require dedication or
easements for trails as part of the development
review process, where appropriate. Dedicate or
acquire open space along creeks and utility corridors
for trails through regional cooperation, grants and
private development review. Emphasize
implementation of the Cupertino Loop Trail.
X X TBD; Costs for trails will be based on
Public Works’ estimates
Longer term: Build more trails and improve trail
corridors. Connect parks via walkways to nearby trails
and ensure key parks include trailhead amenities.
Continue to pursue opportunities for planned trail
development. Require dedication or easements for
trails as part of the development review process,
where appropriate. Dedicate or acquire open space
along creeks and utility corridors for trails through
regional cooperation, grants and private
development review.
X X X X X X X X
Coordinate to develop trails from the Bicycle
Transportation Plan, Pedestrian
Transportation Plan, regional plans and this
Master Plan that support multi-use
recreation, park access and connectivity to
community destinations.
-accessible, firm and stable multi-use, off-road
trails
-signage/wayfinding
-distance/mileage markers
-information kiosks
-crossings
-seating
-interpretive elements or art
-outdoor fitness equipment/par course elements
-adjacent soft-surfaced jogging trail
-green infrastructure
-wider corridor for greenspace protection or
riparian enhancement
Prioritize connections between parks,
schools, and trails; extensions of
existing trails; gap closures; and
completing loop trails.Other/Repurposed BuildingTable F-2: New Major Park & Recreation Facility Opportunities
Revised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Develop 1-3 parks. Prioritize
underserved areas especially in north
and east Cupertino per findings
regarding underserved areas.
Numbers of parks and size may vary
depending on opportunities. Strive to
acquire 3.5+ acres if possible.
Trails and Trail Corridors
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use SitesPotential New Parks
Potential New Trails
-play opportunities
-seating
-green space/open lawn
-small group gathering space/picnic area
-looped walking path
-game space
-active-use courts as space allows
-neighborhood-serving amenities
-landscaping/native plantings
If opportunities arise, acquire and develop
new neighborhood parks especially in
targeted underserved areas.
Neighborhood Parks
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****Other/Repurposed BuildingRevised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use Sites
Short term: Pursue opportunities to partner with existing
aquatics providers including schools. If a new city
facility is desired, prepare a market analysis and
business plan to evaluate site selection and program
elements and define anticpated operating costs.
Phasing to be dependent on business plan. Explore
acquisition opportunities. Consider as part of the
Memorial Park Master Plan. Consider opportunities to
combine with the existing Sports Center and/or a new
Gymnasium/Multi-Use Recreation Center.
X X $45-60,000,000 $$$$$
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a year-round
aquatics facility.
X X X X X X
Short term: Pursue partnership and joint use
opportunities to provide gym space. If a new
gym/multi-use rec center is desired, prepare a market
analysis and business plan to evaluate site selection
and program elements and define anticipated
operating costs. Consider as part of the Memorial
Park Master Plan. Consider opportunities to combine
with the existing Sports Center and/or a new
Gymnasium/Multi-Use Recreation Center.
X X X $30-40,000,000 $$$
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a multi-
generational gymnasium and multi-use recreation
center complex. Consider multi-story design solutions
and rooftop use.
X X X X X X X
Gymnasium Complex & Multi-use
Recreation Center
Explore partnership opportunities to provide
gym space. If a new facility is warranted and
desired in the future, provide a multi-
generational gymnasium complex and
recreation center to provide sports court
spaces and support other activities.
-full size basketball court(s) with bleachers and
dividing walls
-volleyball, badminton, pickleball space or
overlays
-fitness studios
-gymnastics space
-multipurpose rooms for smaller court sports and
other activities
-senior fitness room
-multi-purpose rooms (reservable) and meeting
rooms
-program space
-social space/coffee kiosk
-teen room
-childcare room
-possible additional features such as climbing
wall; rooftop/elevated track
-locker rooms, family changing rooms
-office space
-lobby/front desk/reception
-equipment room and storage
-nearby parking
If pursued, develop one centrally
located facility; could be co-located
or combined with other major
facilities. Ensure additional space for
parking and grounds with access via
arterial/collector street. Nearby transit
desirable. This facility would have
synergy with an Aquatics Center or a
Teen Center.
Aquatics Facility Explore partnership opportunities to provide
year-round aquatics. If a new facility is
warranted and desired in the future, provide
year-round swimming facility designed for
recreation and instructional swimming,
aquatic exercise / lap swimming, and pool
events.
-lap pool
-warm water instructional pool
-recreation pool
-hot tub
-zero depth entry
-lazy river
-water play features
-support spaces such as lifeguard/office space,
locker rooms, family changing rooms, outdoor
showers, storage, mechanical space,
lounge/spectator areas
-cost recovery features such as all-purpose
spaces, birthday party rooms, concessions, and
rental features
-nearby parking
If pursed, develop one facility in an
accessible location; consider sites in
central and east Cupertino or
opportunities to co-develop with
another centralized major facility to
increase programming options.
Provide parking and access via
arterial/collector street, ideally near
transit.
Provide a minimum of 2-3 acres.
Could be co-located with another
identified proposed or existing facility.
Potential New Major Facilities
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****Other/Repurposed BuildingRevised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use Sites Short term: Explore partnership and joint use
opportunities with high schools and DeAnza College
or other potential partners with existing performing arts
space to meet immediate needs. If a new city facility
is desired, prepare a market analysis and business
plan to evaluate site selection and potential program
elements and define anticipated operating costs.
X X X $60-100,000,000 $$$$
Longer term: If a new facility is warranted and desired,
plan, design, develop and operate a performing and
fine arts center with arts wing.
X X X X X X
Short term: Continue to refine and expand teen
services. Maintain existing teen center facility without
significant reinvestment. Coordinate with the School
District on the Lawson Teen Center Pilot Program for
mobile recreation options. Consider other partnership
opportunities to create a unique teen space in
Cupertino. Consider a trial project to test teen interest
in teen amenities at Creekside Park.
X X
Longer term: Integrate teen uses into a multi-
generational facility or new teen space if pursued,
and repurpose the existing Teen Center. Continue
hosting teen activities at school sites and other
locations besides the Teen Center.
X X X X X X X X
Performing/Fine Arts Center Explore partnership opportunities to
provide performing/fine arts space. If a
new facility is warranted and desired in
the future, develop a community
auditorium and/or fine and performing
arts center to house community-scale
performances and support daytime arts
and recreation programs as well as
evening programs and events.
-industry-standard stage
-professional lighting
-sloped floor, fixed seating
-pull-down screen
-dressing rooms
-restrooms
-backstage storage
-box office, lobby, concessions
-smaller theater/rehearsal space
-dance studio/floor
-recording & television studio
-arts wing for drawing, painting,
photography, theater, dance, music/voice
lessons
-arts/crafts/ceramics spaces
-practice/instruction rooms
-reservable multi-purpose room-dance
studio/floor
-maker/incubator space (computer lab,
graphics & animation studio, industrial
shop)
-catering kitchen
-offices
-storage
-outdoor (or indoor/outdoor) event space
or art plaza
-ceramics/crafts/art spaces
-nearby parking
If pursued, develop one facility in
a centralized location near
businesses, restaurants and/or
attractions. Consider space near
potential partners, Cupertino's
civic center, or nightlife-oriented
downtown areas. Ensure
additional space for parking and
grounds with access via
arterial/collector street and
ideally near transit.
May be co-located with other
major facilities (e.g., community
center, senior center), but
typically lacks synergy with other
active uses (e.g., sports fields,
gymnasiums, and swimming
pools).
-study room
-café
-computer lab and/or video gaming
-game room
-meeting/program space
-open gym; basketball hoop
-kitchen
Location near a middle and/or high
school, library or shopping/downtown
area. Consider Library/Civic Center,
high school/middle school corridors,
and Wilson & Creekside parks. Do not
develop as a stand-alone facility.
Consider co-locating with gymnasium
complex, performing/ fine arts center,
incubator/ maker space or other
major facility.
Create unique teen space that may include
student union-style gathering and program
space and/or active indoor use for teens.
Enhanced Teen Space or Services
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses for
potential New Major Features or Major Facility
Enhancements will be determined through site
master plans, facility business plans, and market
studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution* Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldPotential AcquisitionPublic-private partnershipJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level Project
Cost Estimate (per
project)***
Operating
Cost****Other/Repurposed BuildingRevised 10/03/19 Potential City-Owned Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Community/Large Neighborhood
Parks
Other Special Use Sites
Short term: Conduct survey to evaluate interest in
alternative locations as well as alternative recreation
opportunities for seniors; explore potential locations
based on results. Develop mobile activities as a test
pilot to gauge interest in new locations and new
programs. Explore partnership opportunities. Conduct
a facility evaluation to evaluate facility renovations
that would enhance the function, capacity and
financial sustainability of the Senior Center.
X X X X $15-25,000,000 $$$
Longer term: Consider potential Senior Center
renovations, and providing older adult recreation with
a multigenerational gymnasium complex,
performing/fine arts center, or other major facilities if
pursued.
X X X X X
Short term: Continue to maintain existing facility
without significant reinvestment. Consider reuse of
buildings and space in conjunction with other major
facilities. Coordinate with results of Public Works'
Facility Condition and Use Assessment.
X X X X
Longer term: Renovate, replace or relocate buildings
as needed.X X X X
Other Replaced or Repurposed Existing
Building
Re-evaluate and consider replacement or
repurposing of existing aging, worn or
underperforming buildings in conjunction
with the development of new facilities.
-range of options including removing or
replacing buildings with new buildings or
additional recreational facilities
-projects dependent on major facility
development and considerations
Re-evaluate the following aging
facilities:
-Monta Vista buildings (multi-use &
preschool buildings)
-Wilson Park ceramics building
-Portal Park stand-alone building
-Stevens Creek Corridor Park aging
infrastructure, consistent with
outcomes of Stevens Creek Corridor
Master Plan (Stocklmeir Ranch house,
Blue Pheasant/Pro Shop, Blackberry
Farm pool complex, McClellan
Ranch Barn, former residence at
22050 Stevens Creek Blvd., etc.)
Expanded Senior Center or Services Provide additional recreation space for older
adults, and both frail and active seniors.
Incorporate senior space into a multi-
generation facility, such as as gymnasium
complex/recreation center, if such a facility
is pursued in the future.
-2-story addition with elevator access to second
floor (if existing center expanded)
-exercise rooms or half-court gym space
-multi-age programming space for frail to active
seniors
-arts & crafts room
-music rooms of different sizes with presentation
capacity
-additional classrooms and meeting rooms
-private consultation/health/conference room
-front desk/reception area
-office space
-storage
-accessible parking and drop off areas
-parking lot circulation improvements
-outdoor low impact game space, gardens,
and activity areas
If warranted, expand existing Senior
Center, and consider other locations
to expand distribution of senior
activities. Co-locate senior activities
in other recreation areas to
encourage multi-age programming
as well as a range of offerings for frail
to active seniors.
Potential Major Facility Enhancements
* Note: Si
tes w
ill be determined through site master plans, trails plans and other decision-making processes based on community priorities, the availability of project resources and site opportunities emerging over time. All sites should consider access, transportation, parking
** Note: The actual phasing and sequencing of projects is opportunity-driven and may vary depending on funding, site master plans recommendations, business planning, partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities and similar variables. Longer term projects may be moved
to the short term under the right circumstances.
***See PLANNING LEVEL COST ASSUMPTIONS & ESTIMATES for further delineation of assumptions.
Key to Operations Costs:
$ = no new staffing; minimal impact on existing operating budgets
$$ = minimal new staffing; modest impact on existing operating budgets
$$$ = moderate new staffing; facility expected to cover much or most of its staffing and programming costs over time
$$$$ = extensive new staffing; facility expected to need city subsidy during early years but could cover much of its staffing and programming costs over time (~80+%)
$$$$$ = extensive new staffing; facility expected to involve ongoing significant annual city subsidy
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Short Term: Create a pilot program at one site,
considering a park with good tree canopy and
natural features. Evaluate and pursue opportunities
for a destination nature play area that incorporates
water play elements.
X X X X X X X $300,000
Longer Term: Build a permanent nature play area.
Develop 2-3 additional nature play areas at parks or
along trail corridors that are geographically
distributed.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Short Term: Plan, design and build a destination all-
inclusive play area. Incorporate Feasibility Study
findings. Evaluate and pursue opportunities to add
inclusive play options citywide at additional park sites
that are geographically distributed.
X $1,000,000-5,000,000
Longer Term: Implement opportunities to integrate
other universal play elements (e.g., swings, slides)
that are geographically distributed at existing play
areas when replacing play equipment at the end of
its lifecycle or renovating a park site. Emphasize
community parks and large neighborhood parks for
installation of more extensive universal/all-inclusive
elements
X X X X X X X X X X X
Short Term: Consider as part of the Memorial Park
Master Plan. Develop an action play to identify top
sites and prioritization for implementing at least one
new water play area in the short term.
X $1,000,000-2,000,000
Longer Term: Consider opportunities in community
parks and large neighborhood parks to add water
play features. These may be stand-alone new areas
or integrated into existing play areas.
X X X X X X X X X
Improved Outdoor Event Space --
Citywide Events
Provide event space to support large group
events and programs (500+ people).
-infrastructure
-utilities (electricity, water, restrooms, lighting)
-staging areas
-loading and unloading zones
-large group amphitheaters
-event hardscape or lawn
-portable stage and other equipment
-improved park circulation
-support amenities (mix of permanent and portable
elements, including shade, seating, restrooms,
parking, bike parking, drinking fountains, trash
receptacles)
Focus on improvements to existing event space, such as
Memorial Park and the Civic Center, to take advantage of
the existing amenities, centralized location and transit
access. Improve pedestrian/bike access and infrastructure.
Short Term: Include better event infrastructure and
amphitheater and circulation improvements in the
Memorial Park Master Plan. Begin improvements,
phased as per the site master planning timeline.
Longer term: Evaluate options and improve
Creekside Park and the Civic Center for events and
markets.
X X X $200,000-1,500,000
Improved Outdoor Event Space--
Neighborhood Events
Provide event space to support small group
events, programs and outdoor classes (50-
500 people).
Smaller event spaces could accommodate
neighborhood movies, small performances,
cultural events, meet-up group activities,
mobile programming and outdoor classes,
such as yoga and tai chi, and 'art in the
park' activities.
-hardscape
-utilities
-sloped hillside and stage
-portable stage, screen and other equipment
-lawn area
-shade
-pavilion or outdoor classroom with movable chairs
and tables for flexible program use
-support amenities such as restrooms and parking
Parking, electrical power, restrooms, room to
accommodate stage(s) and attendees, bike parking, and
seating are considerations. Nearby transit is desirable.
Short Term: Develop one pilot project. Provide
hardscape/softscape areas and access to power.
Longer Term: Identify and plan projects for 1-2
additional sites. Include an outdoor pavilion or space
to accommodate a portable stage.
X X X X X X X X X X X X $200,000-1,500,000
Develop 3 to 4 geographically dispersed across the city.
Provide play areas in a mix of community parks, large
neighborhood parks, smaller parks and trail corridors.
Locate at least one in a more natural site and in a park
where natural elements/native plantings exist or are being
added. These may replace an existing play area at the end
of its lifecycle. Create at least one destination nature play
facility in a more centralized, accessible location.
Provide one that is centrally located in a community park or
large neighborhood park. Accessible parking necessary
and nearby transit access desirable. Pursue integrating
other universal play elements in additional parks.
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingGeographically distribute 3-4 different types of water play
opportunities. Consider adding to community parks and
large neighborhood parks, taking into account the existing
interactive fountain at Community Hall and a potential
new water play feature in Memorial Park renovations or at
a new Aquatics Facility. Provide one destination water play
feature in a community park that is centralized for easy
access.Public-private partnershipTrail CorridorsPotential Added Recreation Facilities
-play area designed for all ages and abilities
-stimulation for multiple senses (tactile/touch;
auditory/hearing; visual/sight; gustatory/taste;
olfactory/smell; proprioception [body awareness];
vestibular processing [understanding changes in
location, orientation in space, and balance]; and
interception)
-parallel play with different levels of challenge
-shade
-accessible and diverse seating arrangements
Support all-inclusive and universal play by
providing a destination universal / all-
inclusive play area and adding additional
inclusive elements at existing play areas.
Table F-3: Opportunities for Added Recreation Elements
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsUniversal/All-Inclusive Play Areas
Nature Play Areas Provide nature play elements in parks to
connect people to nature and support
experiential play.
Water Play Integrate a variety of water play
opportunities at existing parks.
-interactive water play feature
-playable water channel
-spray play areas
-splash pads
-hand pump and sand play area
-climbable elements such as logs, stumps, boulders,
mounds and trees
-water features or water play features (hand pump,
e.g.)
-sand, mud, wood chips, rocks
-movable pieces, such as branches for fort-building
-other natural play elements consistent with the site
character
-plants and trees
-butterfly gardens
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingPublic-private partnershipTrail Corridors
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsMulti-Use Sport Fields Increase the playing capacity of existing
sports fields. If feasible, add new multi-use
rectangular fields. Address needs for fields if
an existing field is displaced by new facility
development.
-regulation-size rectangular field lined for soccer,
multi-use
-regulation-size diamond field designed for
baseball/softball
- diamond field with rectangular field overlay where
feasible
-turf or artificial turf
-field lighting, if feasible
-amenities such as bleachers, dugouts, concessions,
and shade
Given size requirements, provide improvements and new
fields where feasible.
Short Term: Explore options to keep the existing ball
field at Memorial Park as part of the site master
planning process. Explore joint use agreements with
schools to provide additional access to existing sport
fields. Evaluate and implement changes to field
scheduling to increase capacity and usage.
Longer Term: Continue to improve amenities at
existing fields. Acquire ownership or use of other
site(s) as opportunities arise.
X X X X X X X X X X $2,500,000+
Cricket Field Develop a community-size field to support
youth and adult cricket play.
-regulation size turf field and pitch for adult play, but
if space is constrained, to support youth play
-may be overlay on other field sports
-may consider international size field if developed
through partner collaboration
-may include amenities such as lighting, storage,
shade, concessions
Provide one field in an accessible location. Consider large
neighborhood parks, community parks and partner sites,
such as schools and parks provided by other cities or
agencies. Avoid displacing existing fields. See Cricket Field
Study for reference regarding necessary support amenities if
an international size field is considered at a partner site.
Cupertino needs are based on providing a community-size
field for youth and adult play.
Short Term: Explore opportunities to partner with the
County, School District, neighboring city or other
jurisdiction to create a shared/joint-use facility in the
region to support youth and adult play.
Longer Term: If a suitable site is identified, partner to
design and build facility. Depending on the nature
and type of facility constructed, re-evaluate needs
for the Library Field youth cricket field.
X X $5,000,000
Dog Park(s)/Dog Off-Leash Area(s)Provide additional dog parks, smaller dog
runs, and/or off-leash areas.
-unfenced off-leash area; may be temporary or
permanent and demarcated by signage, cones or
similar features
-smaller dog run, mid-size dog area, or full size dog
park with different fenced areas for small and large
dogs
-fence, suited to character of park
-double entry gate
-turf, decomposed granite, other suitable surfacing,
or combination
-dog waste dispensers
-dog drinking stations
-water pools
-seating and picnic tables
-shade shelter
-lighting
-topography and landscaping
Provide two or more additional facilities or off-leash areas
to be geographically distributed (away from existing facility
at Mary Avenue). Consider large and small neighborhood
parks.
Short Term: Identify potential sites and determine
neighborhood support. Respond to residents’ request
for a trial off-leash dog area. If implemented and
successful, pursue at additional suitable sites.
Longer Term: Develop dog runs, off-leash areas or
dog parks. Note: the timing may be considered in
conjunction with park site master planning.
X X X X X X X X X X X X $600,000
Basketball Courts Provide basketball courts to diversify
recreation and sports opportunities.
-full-size courts are strongly preferred and are
prioritized
-consider half-size courts or hoops where space does
not allow full-size
-lighting, if feasible
Provide 3-4 or more courts to be geographically distributed.
New facilities may be considered in replacement of existing
half courts and hoops (Somerset, Hoover, Jollyman, and
Creekside), at additional large neighborhood parks or joint-
use schools.
Short Term: Develop 1-2 courts.
Longer Term: Develop 1-2 or more courts.
X X X X X X X X X X $250,000
Pickleball Courts Provide pickleball courts to diversify
recreation and sports opportunities.
-pickleball courts (paired if possible)
-tournament-friendly pickleball venue (6+ courts)
Provide 4 or more courts to be geographically distributed
and a tournament venue in a convenient location.
Consider joint-striping of existing tennis courts at Varian Park,
Monta Vista Park and Memorial Park. (Avoid joint-striping
tennis courts used for competitive play.) Consider providing
courts in neighborhoods or sites in need of low-impact
fitness activities for seniors and adults.
Short Term: Develop 2 courts. Consider overlays or
joint striping of existing tennis courts that only support
recreational play. Consider pickleball striping for
multi-court tournament venue in conjunction with
Memorial Park Master Plan.
Longer Term: Develop 2 or more additional courts
and pickleball complex.
X X X X X X X X X X $30-40,000+, $500-600,000
Potential Added Recreation Facilities Cont.
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingPublic-private partnershipTrail Corridors
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsGardens Provide more opportunities for community
gardens. Pursue a healing garden.
Consider opportunities for gardens of other
types in parks, such as demonstration
gardens, rain gardens and orchards.
For community gardens:
-combination of in-ground, raised beds, and
accessible planting areas
-individual reservable plots and group spaces
-fencing, water, composting/green waste recycling
-native plant hedges or hedgerows
-seating, shade
For Healing garden:
-garden showcasing healing plants
-informational/educational elements
Other gardens:
-demonstration garden showcasing methods of
gardening or different plant palettes such as organic
gardening techniques, xeriscaping, native species,
plantings for pollinators, birds and wildlife
-bird baths and bird houses
-rain garden and stormwater garden elements
-orchards or permaculture plantings
-sister city-inspired gardens
Provide 1-2 or more new community gardens at site(s)
agriculturally suitable for growing, based on aspects such
as soil conditions, topography and solar access.
Geographically disperse from existing facility at McClellan
Ranch. Consider locations suitable to support educational
and social use, such as near a school or senior center.
Consider areas of higher residential density with less access
to gardening space. Consider smaller, neighborhood-scale
gardens at more numerous locations.
Identify a venue for a healing garden that is agriculturally
suitable and can accommodate intended features and
visitorship.
Short Term: Develop a community garden
implementation plan that renovates in a timely
manner the existing site at McClellan Ranch and
identifies suitable sites and priorities for
implementation. Add at least one or more
community gardens in an underutilized area or
unneeded lawn area within a park, preferably in an
area with higher density population.
Longer Term: Evaluate demand and needs for
additional community gardens. Implement
additional community gardens accordingly. Select a
location and support implementation of a healing
garden. Consider development of other types of
horticultural gardens.
X X X X X X X X X X X X $500,000 for community
garden
Outdoor Recreation Diversity Provide a broader range of outdoor
recreation opportunities, including facilities
that support individual and group activities,
with a broad range of varied challenge
levels. Diversify facilities to appeal to
Cupertino's diverse population and reflect
Cupertino's unique character.
-loop paths & mile markers
-outdoor fitness equipment
-bocce, lawn bowling or petanque
-outdoor table tennis (ping pong)
-outdoor chess
-badminton
-volleyball
-pickleball
-futsal
-tai chi
-disc golf
-bike skills area/pump track
-parkour obstacle course
-climbing spire
-zip line
-outdoor "living rooms"
-family-style long tables
-thematic play areas
-sound garden
-self-directed hike/app stations
-other facilities to respond to new trends and diverse
cultural needs
Provide at least one unique feature or facility at every
community park and large neighborhood park. Consider
smaller unique elements at other sites, or use art, colors,
and facility choices to create different recreation and play
experiences.
Short Term: Plan and develop one pilot project at
one park to add diversity elements in the first year.
Then rotate through parks and update one to two
parks a year with new elements. Implement an
outdoor table tennis pilot program at 1-2 sites by year
2 to evaluate usage and interest. Identify a suitable
site and implement installation of outdoor fitness
equipment during years 2-5.
Longer Term: Continue rotating through parks and
update one to two parks a year. Evaluate options to
add more diverse and unique features whenever
existing facilities are renovated or replaced.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X $100,000/year
Improved Comfort & Amenities Provide amenities to create welcoming,
inclusive, safe, and comfortable parks for
people of all ages and cultural groups.
Integrate amenities to reflect park
character.
-seating with shade through structures or plantings
-shade shelters (with movable tables/chairs, picnic
tables, or other seating)
-variety of seating options and groupings
-restrooms where appropriate
-drinking fountains/ bottle fillers/ dog drinking dishes
-lighting
-trash/recycling receptacles
-parking
-permeable paving
-bike racks, docking stations
-alternative transportation pickup/drop offs
-art (playable, integrated, stand-alone, and/or
temporary displays)
-signage and wayfinding
-interpretive elements, information kiosks
-wifi
-co-working stations/outdoor work space
-multilingual or icon-based signage
Consider needs at all parks. (Small neighborhood parks may
not need restrooms or parking, e.g.)
Short Term: Update amenities and furnishings at 1-2
sites in conjunction with other park projects. Prioritize
parks with trails, with active walkers and that lack
shade.
Longer Term: Seek to provide comfort improvements
at one site every year, distributed throughout the
system.
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X $100,000/year
Potential Added Recreation Facilities Cont.
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
Siting/ Distribution Project Approach
Opportunity
Potential Elements
[Amenities, program options and uses will be
determined through site master plans, facility business
plans, and market studies]
Site Selection
and Distribution Phasing/Options**Memorial ParkCreekside ParkJollyman ParkWilson ParkStevens Creek Corridor ParkPortal ParkMonta Vista ParkLinda Vista ParkHoover ParkVarian ParkCivic Center/Library FieldThree Oaks ParkSomerset ParkPotential AcquisitionJoint-Use FacilityPlanning Level
Project Cost Estimate
(per project)
Community/Large Neighborhood Parks
Other/Repurposed BuildingPublic-private partnershipTrail Corridors
Revised 10/03/2019 Potential City-Managed Locations
Potential
Alternate
Locations
Other Small Neighborhood ParksSchool FieldsNatural Vegetation Enhancements Reduce turf areas where not actively used
for recreation, and replace with a range of
alternative plantings while considering
maintenance needs.
-native plantings
-natural area protection/restoration
-habitat enhancements
-bioswales
-lawn reduction
-invasive plant removal
-tree preservation and protection (including
orchards, park forests)
-successional tree plantings
-pollinator patches, gardens and corridors
-bee hives
-bird habitat, baths and houses
-riparian enhancements
Explore opportunities to naturalize park spaces not used for
recreation. Provide pollinator corridors through the city.
Short Term: Integrate natural elements into parks
upon renovation or development. Work with partners
to identify significant natural areas to prioritize
enhancements and restoration (potentially in
conjunction with trail development). Consider
natural vegetation enhancements as part of the
Memorial Park Master Plan. Identify defined tasks,
including adding pollinator, habitat and/or native
plantings that are actionable in the short term.
Prepare guidelines for use of native vegetation and
wildlife-friendly elements for parks that are in
proximity to creeks and for trails along creek
corridors.
Longer Term: Seek to reduce lawn and provide
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X $100,000/year
**The actual phasing and sequencing of projects is opportunity-driven and may vary depending on funding, site master plans recommendations, business planning, partnerships, the lifecycle of existing facilities and similar variables. Longer term projects may be moved to the short term under the right circumstances.
Potential Natural Vegetation Enhancements
* Note: Sites will be determined through site master plans, trail plans and other decision-making processes based on community priorities, the availability of project resources and site opportunities emerging over time.
Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan
APPENDIX B
TABLE OF SENSITIVE HABITATS
AND SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 1
Table 1. Special-status Plants and Special-status Wildlife Documented Within 5 miles of the City of Cupertino Master Plan Area.
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
Plants
Congon’s tarplant
(Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) 1B.1
Valley and foothill grasslands with alkaline soils.
Elevations from 0-230 meters. Blooms May-
October (November).
Low. One CNDDB occurrence for Congon’s
tarplant has been documented within 5 miles of
the Master Plan area. No suitable habitat is
present for this species within any of the park
areas.
Robust spineflower
(Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta)
FE
1B.1
Sandy or gravelly soils in maritime chaparral,
openings in cismontane woodlands, coastal
dunes, or coastal scrub. Elevations from 3-300
meters. Blooms April-September.
None. One CNDDB occurrence for robust
spineflower has been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area. This species is
presumed extirpated from Santa Clara County.
No suitable habitat for robust spineflower is
present in the Master Plan area.
Santa Clara red ribbons
(Clarkia concinna ssp. automixa) 4.3
Chaparral and cismontane woodland. Elevations
from 90-1,500 meters. Blooms (April) May-June
(July).
Moderate. Three CNDDB occurrences for Santa
Clara red ribbons have been documented
within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. This
species has been documented at nearby Lehigh
Permanente Quarry. This species could be
present within the undeveloped portion of
Linda Vista Park.
• Western leatherwood
• (Dirca occidentalis) 1B.2
Mesic broadleafed upland forest, closed-cone
coniferous forest, chaparral, cismontane
woodland, north coast coniferous forest,
riparian forest, and riparian woodland.
Elevations from 25-425 meters. Blooms
January-April.
Moderate. Four CNDDB occurrences for
western leatherwood have been documented
within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. Suitable
habitat for this species is present within riparian
and oak woodland habitat in the Master Plan
area, including in the Stevens Creek Corridor,
near Creekside Park, along the Saratoga Creek
Trail, and in Linda Vista Park.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 2
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
• Loma Prieta hoita
• (Hoita strobilina) 1B.1
Chaparral, cismontane woodland, and riparian
woodland. Usually serpentinite, mesic.
Elevations from 30-860 meters. Blooms May-
July (August-October).
Low. One CNDDB occurrence for Loma Prieta
hoita has been documented within 5 miles of
the Master Plan area. Although riparian habitat
is present within or adjacent to some of the
parks, no serpentinite soils are present. As a
result, only marginal habitat is present in or
near the parks for this species.
Arcuate bush-mallow
(Malacothamnus arcuatus) 1B.2
Gravelly alluvium in chaparral and cismontane
woodland. Elevation 15-355 meters. Bloom
April-September.
Moderate. One CNDDB occurrence for arcuate
bush-mallow has been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area. Limited suitable
chaparral and cistmontane woodland habitat is
present within the undeveloped portion of
Linda Vista Park.
• Woodland woollythreads
• (Monolopia gracilens) 1B.2
Chaparral, valley, and foothill grassland,
cismontane woodland, broadleaved upland
forest, North Coast coniferous forest. Grassy
sites in openings, sandy to rocky soils, often
seen on serpentine after burns. Elevations from
100-1,200 meters. Blooms February-July.
Moderate. Three CNDDB occurrences for
woodland woollythreads have been
documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan
area. Limited suitable habitat for this species
may be present within the undeveloped portion
of Linda Vista Park.
• Hairless popcornflower
• (Plagiobothrys glaber) 1A
Alkaline meadows and seeps and coastal salt
marshes and swamps. Elevations from 15-180
meters. Blooms March-May.
None. One CNDDB occurrence for hairless
popcornflower has been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area. However, the last
confirmed sighting of this plant was in 1954 and
it is thought to be extinct. No suitable habitat
for this species is present in the Master Plan
area.
• Chaparral ragwort
• (Senecio aphanactis) 2B.2
Sometimes alkaline chaparral, cismontane
woodland, and coastal scrub. Elevations from
15-800 meters. Blooms January-April (May).
Low. No CNDDB occurrences for chaparral
ragwort have been documented within 5 miles
of the Master Plan area. Some limited marginal
habitat for this species is present in Linda Vista
Park.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 3
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
Animals
Invertebrates
• Monarch Butterfly
• (Danuas plexiuppus) FC
Winter roosts in wind-protected tree groves
close to sources of nectar and water, including
in eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), Monterey pine
(Pinus radiata) and Monterey cypress
(Cupressus macrocarpa) groves are also used.
Breeding habitat essentially features native
milkweeds (Asclepias sp.) and trees or shrubs
for shading and roosting, and connectivity
among these habitat elements.
High. Monarchs are known to breed within the
Stevens Creek Corridor, including McClellan
Ranch and Stocklmeir, since 2015 after narrow-
leaved milkweed (Asclepias fascicularis) was
planted.
Fish
• Steelhead (Central California Coast Distinct
Population Segment [DPS])
• (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
FT Deep pools within fast moving streams and
shallow water gravel beds for spawning.
High. Central California Coast steelhead
historically occurred in Calabazas Creek;
however, this species has not been observed in
this creek since 1970. Steelhead are not
expected to occur within this reach of Calabazas
Creek due to several impassable barriers to
migration upstream from the San Francisco Bay,
including a 13-foot dam and a drop structure.
Steelhead historically migrated from the San
Francisco Bay to spawn in Saratoga Creek;
however, an impassable barrier is now present
at the confluence of Saratoga Creek and San
Tomas Aquino Creek that prevents steelhead
from passage into Saratoga Creek.
Stevens Creek is located within the Stevens
Creek Corridor Park and is designated as critical
habitat for Central California Coast steelhead.
Stevens Creek is known to support a population
of steelhead year-round.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 4
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
Amphibians
• Santa Cruz black salamander
• (Aneides niger) CSSC
Mixed deciduous and coniferous woodlands
and coastal grasslands. Adults are found under
rocks, talus, and damp woody debris.
Moderate. Six CNDDB occurrences of Santa
Cruz black salamander have been documented
within 5 miles of the Master Plan area,
including in the vicinity of Permanente Creek
near Lehigh Permanente Quarry, near Stevens
Creek Reservoir, and within Stevens Creek near
Los Altos. Suitable habitat is present within the
Stevens Creek Corridor Park portion of the
Master Plan area.
• California giant salamander
• (Dicamptodon ensatus) CSSC
Occurs in wet coastal forests in or near cold
permanent and semi-permanent streams and
seepages.
Moderate. Four CNDDB occurrences of
California giant salamander have been
documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan
area, including within Permanente Creek,
Stevens Creek, Stevens Creek Reservoir, and
Saratoga Creek. Suitable habitat for this species
is present within the creeks throughout the
Master Plan area.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 5
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
• California red-legged frog
• (Rana draytonii)
FT
CSSC
Lowlands and foothills in or near permanent
sources of deep water with dense, shrubby or
emergent riparian vegetation.
High. Six CNDDB occurrences for California red-
legged frog have been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area, including within
Permanente Creek, Gate of Heaven Cemetery
Pond, Calabazas Creek, Pichetti Ranch Open
Space, and Saratoga Creek. Suitable habitat for
this species is present within and adjacent to
numerous creeks in the Master Plan area,
including Calabazas Creek, Saratoga Creek, and
Stevens Creek.
• California tiger salamander
• (Ambystoma californiense)
FT
CT
WL
Need vernal pools or other sources of seasonal
water for breeding and underground refuges
(e.g., small mammal burrows) for aestivation.
Low. Two CNDDB occurrences for California
tiger salamander have been documented within
5 miles of the Master Plan area, including in
Permanente Creek. California tiger salamander
is not expected to occur within or near any of
the Master Plan park or trail areas due to the
lack of suitable upland aestivation habitat and
breeding sites.
• Foothill yellow-legged frog
• (Rana boylii)
FC
CSSC
Partly-shaded, shallow streams and riffles with
a rocky substrate in a variety of habitats.
Low. Two CNDDB occurrences foothill yellow-
legged frog have been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area, although both of
these occurrences are considered extirpated.
Foothill yellow-legged frog could occur within
the Stevens Creek Corridor, depending on the
type of habitat present within this section of
the creek.
Reptiles
• Northern California legless lizard
• (Anniella pulchra) CSSC Found in sandy or loose loamy soils under
sparse vegetation.
Low. One CNDDB occurrence for northern
California legless lizard has been documented
within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. Very
limited suitable habitat, if any, is present within
the Master Plan area.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 6
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
• Western pond turtle
• (Emys marmorata) CSSC
A thoroughly aquatic turtle of ponds, marshes,
rivers, streams and irrigation ditches, usually
with aquatic vegetation. Needs basking sites
(sandy banks and grassy open fields) and
suitable upland habitat.
Moderate. No CNDDB records for western pond
turtle have been documented within the
Master Plan area. Western pond turtle has
been observed within the City, including at
McClellan Ranch in 2009. Suitable riverine
habitat for western pond turtles occurs within
the Master Plan area in Stevens Creek and may
occur within other creeks in the Master Plan
area, including Saratoga Creek and Calabazas
Creek. Suitable grassy, upland nesting habitat is
also present adjacent to Stevens Creek at
McClellan Ranch West and the open grassland
parcel just north of McClellan Ranch.
Birds: Raptors
Cooper’s hawk
(Accipiter cooperii) WL Inhabit dense stands of riparian habitat or live
oak and deciduous forests near water.
High (Nesting, Wintering/Migration). The
CNDDB documents a nesting pair in 2003 within
the riparian area along Calabazas Creek. A pair
of Cooper’s hawks has also been observed
nesting along Stevens Creek at McClellan Ranch
and Blackberry Farm Park.
Long-eared owl
(Asio otus) CSSC
Frequents dense, riparian and live oak thickets
paralleling stream courses, and nearby
woodland and forest habitats. Require adjacent
open land for foraging.
Low (Nesting, wintering/migration). One
CNDDB occurrence for long-eared owl is
documented in the CNDDB at Monte Bello
Open Space Preserve; however, this occurrence
was from 1987. Very limited suitable habitat for
long-eared owl is present in the western
portion of the Master Plan area in Stevens
Creek Corridor Park and Linda Vista Park.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 7
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
• Western burrowing owl
• (Athene cunicularia) CSSC
Found in open, dry annual or perennial
grasslands, deserts, and other low growing
vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent on
burrowing mammals, especially the California
ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi).
Low (Nesting, Wintering). One CNDDB
occurrence for western burrowing owls has
been documented within 5 miles of the Master
Plan area in Sunnyvale between Patrick Henry
Junior High School and Peterson High School;
however, this occurrence was documented in
1983. No suitable habitat for burrowing owl is
present at any of the parks within the Master
Plan area.
• Golden eagle
• (Aquila chrysaetos) CFP
Found from the tundra, through grasslands,
woodland-brushlands, and forested habitat,
south to arid deserts. Nests in open and semi-
open habitat, but may also nest in coniferous
forest habitat when open space is available
(e.g., fire breaks, clear cuts, pasture land). Nests
constructed on platforms on steep cliffs,
artificial structures (e.g., transmission towers),
or in large trees. Avoids nesting near urban
habitat and does not generally nest in densely
forested habitat.
Low (Nesting, Wintering). No CNDDB
occurrences for golden eagle have been
observed within 5 miles of the Master Plan
area. A golden eagle was observed at
Blackberry Farm in 2015; however, suitable
nesting habitat is limited in the Master Plan
area.
• Swainson’s Hawk
• (Buteo Swainsoni) CT
Breeds in stands with few trees in juniper-sage
flats, riparian corridors, and oak savannah.
Requires suitable adjacent foraging areas such
as grasslands or agricultural fields.
Low (Nesting, Wintering/Migration). One
CNDDB occurrence for Swainson’s hawk has
been documented within 5 miles of the Master
Plan area. This occurrence was a nest in San
Jose documented in 1889. The City is outside
what is generally considered to be the breeding
range for Swainson’s hawk. No suitable
wintering habitat is present within the Master
Plan area.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 8
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
• White-tailed kite
• (Elanus leucurus) CFP Low foothills and valleys with oaks; riparian
areas, marshes near open grasslands for forage.
Moderate (Nesting, Wintering/Migration). One
CNDDB occurrence for white-tailed kite has
been documented within 5 miles of the Master
Plan area where white-tailed kite was known to
breed at the Blackberry Farm Golf Course. A
pair of white-tailed kites, which may have been
the same pair from the golf course, was
observed nesting at the Blackberry Farm group
picnic grounds as well.
American peregrine falcon
• (Falco peregrinus anatum) CFP Riparian areas, wetlands, lakes. Nests on cliffs
or man-made structures.
Low (Nesting, Wintering/Migration). Two
CNDDB occurrences for American peregrine
falcon have been documented within 5 miles of
the Master Plan area. American peregrine
falcons are observed infrequently in McClellan
Ranch Preserve. However, this species is
unlikely to nest within the Master Plan area.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 9
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
Other Birds
• Olive-sided flycatcher
• (Contopus cooperi) CSSC
Associated with coniferous forest openings,
forest edges near natural openings or human -
made openings, or open to semiopen forest
stands. Frequently occurs along wooded shores
of streams, lakes, rivers, ponds, bogs, and
muskegs, where natural edge habitat occurs
and standing dead trees often are present.
Low (Nesting, Wintering/Migrating). No
CNDDB records for olive-sided flycatcher have
been documented within 5 miles of the Master
Plan area. Olive-sided flycatcher has been
observed nearby the Master Plan Area at the
Lehigh Permanente Quarry in April 2008.
However, this species typically breeds in
montane coniferous forests.
• Yellow rail
• (Coturnicops noveboracensis) CSSC Found in freshwater marshlands.
Low (Wintering), None (Nesting). One CNDDB
occurrence for yellow rail has been
documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan
area. No suitable habitat for yellow rail is
present in the project area, especially given the
urban environment within and surrounding the
area.
• Yellow Warbler
• (Setophaga petechia) CSSC Riparian plant associations in close proximity to
water; often in willow thickets.
Moderate (Nesting, Winter/Migration). No
CNDDB records for yellow warbler have been
documented within 5 miles of the Master Plan
area. Yellow warbler has frequently been
observed nearby the Master Plan Area at the
Lehigh Permanente Quarry. Suitable habitat is
present within the riparian corridors in the
Master Plan area and that are near City parks.
Mammals
• Pallid bat
• (Antrozous pallidus) CSSC
• Found in dry, open habitats including deserts,
grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and forests.
Roosts in protected structures and rocky
outcrops.
• Moderate. One CNDDB occurrence for pallid
bat has been documented within 5 miles of the
Master Plan area. Pallid bats have been
observed in the Stevens Creek corridor on a
transient basis during spring and summer
seasonal movements.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 10
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
• Townsend’s big-eared bat
• (Corynorhinus townsendii) CSSC
• Roosts in caves, mines, and large trees. It
forages within woodlands and along stream
edges; extremely sensitive to human
disturbance.
• Low. One CNDDB occurrence for Townsend’s
big-eared bat has been documented within 5
miles of the Master Plan area in a barn on the
Pichetti Winery. Although suitable habitat is
present in the Master Plan area, Townsend’s
big-eared bats are extremely sensitive to
human disturbance and would not be expected
within the City’s urban environment.
• San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat
• (Neotoma fuscipes annectens) CSSC • Forest and scrub habitats of moderate canopy
and moderate dense understory.
• High. One CNDDB occurrence for San Francisco
dusky-footed woodrat has been documented
within 5 miles of the Master Plan area. San
Francisco dusky-footed woodrat houses and
individuals have been observed at Blackberry
Farm and at Stocklmeir, as well as throughout
the Stevens Creek Corridor Park and/or oak
woodland areas. San Francisco dusky-footed
woodrat houses may also be found in other
riparian habitat within the Master Plan area, as
well as within oak woodland habitat in Linda
Vista Park.
Sensitive Habitats and Special-Status Species Page 11
Species Name Listing
Status Habitat Requirements Potential to Occur in the Potential Master Plan
Project Areas
Status Key:
Federal
FT – Federal Threatened
FE – Federal Endangered
FC – Candidate for Federal Listing
State
ST – State Threatened
SE – State Endangered
CFP – California Fully-Protected
CSSC – California Species of Special Concern
WL – California Watchlist Species
California Native Plant Society (CNPS)
Rank 1A – Presumed extinct in California;
Rank 1B – Rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere;
Rank 2A – Plants presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere;
Rank 2B – Rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere;
Rank 4 – Plants of limited distribution.
Additional threat ranks endangerment codes are assigned to each taxon or group as follows:
.1 – Seriously endangered in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened/high degree of immediacy of threat).
.2 – Fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened).
.3 – Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened or no current threats known).
Source: CDFW. 2019. California Natural Diversity Database.
CNPS. 2019. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California.
APPENDIX C
Cupertino Historical
Resources
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING DRAFT EIR CITY OF CUPERTINO CULTURAL RESOURCES TABLE 4.4‐2 CULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA AND VICINITY Site # Site Identifier/ Name Resource Type Site Name Address Year Built Status Project Components Inclusive of Cultural Resources Recorded Cultural Resources 1 P‐43‐0676 Historical – Forest Fire Station Stevens Creek Forest Fire Station 13326 Stevens Canyon Blvd. 1953 Appears eligible for NR N/A (outside City jurisdiction) 2 P‐43‐1833 CA‐SCL‐892H Historical – Railroad Segment 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 3 P‐43‐1867 Historical – Quarry24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 4 P‐43‐1868 Historical – Road24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 5 P‐43‐1869 Historical – Cabin 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 6 P‐43‐1870 Historical – Pumphouse 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 7 P‐43‐2253 CA‐SCL‐881H Historical – Root Cellar 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 8 P‐43‐2264 CA‐SCL‐882H Historical – Orchard 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 9 P‐43‐2267 Historical – Homestead 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 10 P‐43‐2268 CA‐SCL‐883H Historical – Homestead 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 11 P‐43‐2269 CA‐SCL‐884H Historical – Homestead 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 12 P‐43‐2270 Historical – Homestead 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 13 P‐43‐2350 Historical – Ranch Complex Seven Springs Ranch 11801 Dorothy Anne Way 1866 Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 14 P‐43‐2620 Historical – Church Good Shepherd Church 940 South Stelling Road 1960 Ineligible for NR; not evaluated for CR eligibility N/A 15 P‐43‐2644 Historical – Commercial Building 10291 South De Anza Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility South De Anza SpecialArea 16 P‐43‐2690 Historical – Conveyor System 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 17 P‐43‐2691 Historical – Crusher 24001 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 18 CA‐SCL‐69 Prehistoric – Native American Site N/A Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A Page 1
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING DRAFT EIR CITY OF CUPERTINO CULTURAL RESOURCES TABLE 4.4‐2 CULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA AND VICINITY Site # Site Identifier/ Name Resource Type Site Name Address Year Built Status Project Components Inclusive of Cultural Resources 19 P‐43‐0392 CA‐SCL‐386H Historical – Mansion Le Petit Trianon 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd. 1892 NR / CR / LL Heart of the City Special Area 20 CA‐SCL‐414H Historical – Winery Complex Picchetti Brothers Winery and Ranch 13100 Montebello Road 1880 LL, appears eligible for NR N/A (outside City jurisdiction) 21 CA‐SCL‐449H Historical – House and Outbuildings 10505 Miller Avenue Unknown Demolished circa 2007. Documentation updated. N/A 22 CA‐SCL‐715 Prehistoric – Native American Site N/A Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A Office of Historic Preservation Directory Listings 23 179443Seven Springs Ranch 11801 Dorothy Anne Way 1866 Nominated for inclusion in the NR. Not currently listed in NR or CR. N/A 24 91326San Antonio School 2472 Foothill Blvd. Unknown LL / NR / Not evaluated for CR eligibility N/A 25 91204E.J. Parrish HouseMary Avenue 1895 Burned in 1977. Documentation updated. Heart of the City Special Area 26 89437Arroyo de San Joseph Cupertino 21840 McClellan Road Unknown CR / Eligible for NR N/A (on Fremont High School District property) 27 13188Picchetti Brothers Winery and Ranch 13100 Montebello Road 1880 LL / NR / CR N/A (outside city jurisdiction) 28 13187Woodhills Estate (Fremont and Cora Older Ranch) 22800 West Prospect Road 1913 NR / CR N/A (outside City jurisdiction) 29 179158Good Shepherd Church 940 South Stelling Road 1960 Ineligible for NR, not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 30 105984Stevens Creek Forest Fire Station 13326 Stevens Canyon Road Unknown Appears eligible for NR N/A (outside city jurisdiction) 31 172995N/A 20510 Stevens Creek Blvd. 1959 Ineligible for NR, not evaluated for CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area 32 75821Le Petit Trianon 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd. 1892 CR / LL Heart of the City Special Area 33 13186Le Petit Trianon 21250 Stevens Creek Road 1892 NR N/A Page 2
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING DRAFT EIR CITY OF CUPERTINO CULTURAL RESOURCES TABLE 4.4‐2 CULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA AND VICINITY Site # Site Identifier/ Name Resource Type Site Name Address Year Built Status Project Components Inclusive of Cultural Resources 34 91208Fremont and Cora Older Ranch (Woodhills Estate) 22800 West Prospect Road 1913 LL, not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A (outside City jurisdiction) 35 91210Montebello School Montebello Road 1892 LL / not evaluated for NR or CR N/A (outside City jurisdiction) City of Cupertino Historically Significant Resources City of Cupertino Historic Sites 36 Historic Site 1Maryknoll Seminary2300 Cristo Rey Drive Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A (outside Cityjurisdiction) 37 Historic Site 2Snyder Hammond House 22961 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 38 Historic Site 3De La Vega Tack House Rancho Deep Cliff Club HouseUnknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 39 Historic Site 4Baer Blacksmith 22221 McClellan Road (McClellan Ranch Park) Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 40 Historic Site 5Enoch J. Parrish Tank House 22221 McClellan Road (McClellan Ranch Park) Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 41 Historic Site 6Nathan Hall Tank House 22100 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Conformance Sites 44and 45 42 Historic Site 7Gazebo Trim Mary Avenue and Stevens Creek Blvd. (Memorial Park) Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area 43 Historic Site 8Union Church of Cupertino 20900 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area 44 Historic Site 9Old Collins School 20441 Homestead Road Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Homestead SpecialArea 45 Historic Site 10 Miller House 10518 Phil Place Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 46 Historic Site 11 Glendenning Barn 10955 North Tantau Avenue Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility North Vallco Park Special Area City of Cupertino Commemorative Sites 47 Commemorative Site 1 De Anza Knoll Off of Cristo Rey Drive Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 48 Commemorative Site 2 Doyle Winery "Cupertino Wine Company" Visible from McClellan Ranch Park Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A Page 3
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING DRAFT EIR CITY OF CUPERTINO CULTURAL RESOURCES TABLE 4.4‐2 CULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA AND VICINITY Site # Site Identifier/ Name Resource Type Site Name Address Year Built Status Project Components Inclusive of Cultural Resources 49 Commemorative Site 3 Stocklmeir Farmhouse 22120 Stevens Creek Road Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Conformance Site 44 50 Commemorative Site 4 Elisha Stephens Place 22100 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A 51 Commemorative Site 5 Arroyo De San Joseph Cupertino 21840 McClellan Road Unknown Automatically eligible for NR N/A (Fremont High Unified High School District property) 52 Commemorative Site 6 Hazel Goldstone Variety Store 21700 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Monta Vista Village Neighborhood 53 Commemorative Site 7 Woelffel Cannery 10120 Imperial Avenue Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Monta Vista VillageNeighborhood 54 Commemorative Site 8 Engles Grocery "Paul and Eddie's" 21619 Stevens Creek Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Monta Vista Village Neighborhood 55 Commemorative Site 9 Apple One Building 10240 Bubb Road Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Bubb Road SpecialArea 56 Commemorative Site 10 Baldwin Winery 1250 Stevens Creek Blvd. – De Anza Community College Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the CitySpecial Area 57 Commemorative Site 11 Le Petit Trianon 1250 Stevens Creek Blvd. –De Anza Community College Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area 58 Commemorative Site 12 Interim City Hall 10321 South De Anza Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility South De Anza SpecialArea 59 Commemorative Site 13 City of Cupertino Crossroads Intersection at Stevens Creek Blvd. and De Anza Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area 60 Commemorative Site 14 St. Joseph's Church 10110 North de Anza Blvd. Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area City of Cupertino Community Landmarks 61 Community Landmark A Hanson Permanente Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A (outside City jurisdiction) 62 Community Landmark B Downtown Monta Vista Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Monta Vista VillageNeighborhood 63 Community Landmark C Cupertino Historical Museum (Quinlan Community Center) Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area Page 4
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING DRAFT EIR CITY OF CUPERTINO CULTURAL RESOURCES TABLE 4.4‐2 CULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA AND VICINITY Site # Site Identifier/ Name Resource Type Site Name Address Year Built Status Project Components Inclusive of Cultural Resources 64 Community Landmark D Memorial Park, Community Center, Sports complex Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the CitySpecial Area 65 Community Landmark E De Anza CollegeUnknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the CitySpecial Area 66 Community Landmark F De Anza Industrial Park Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N.De Anza SpecialArea67 Community Landmark G Cupertino Civic Center Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area 68 Community Landmark H Vallco Fashion Park Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility Heart of the City Special Area , Study Area 6 (Vallco Shopping District), Housing Element Site 11 (Vallco Shopping District except Rosebowl) 69 Community Landmark I Vallco Industrial Park Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility North Vallco ParkSpecial Area City of Cupertino Sites of Historic Mention 70 Site of Historic Mention 1 Montebello School Montebello Road Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A (outside cityjurisdiction) 71 Site of Historic Mention 2 Perrone Ranch Stone Cellar Unknown Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A (outside cityjurisdiction) 72 Site of Historic Mention 3 Picchetti Brothers Winery and Ranch 13100 Montebello Road1880 Not evaluated for NR or CR eligibility N/A (outside city jurisdiction) 73 Site of Historic Mention 4 Woodhills Estate (Fremont and Cora Older Ranch) 22800 West Prospect Road 1913 Appears eligible for NR N/A (outside city jurisdiction) Notes: NR = National Register; CR = California Register; LL = Local Landmark; N/A = Cultural Resources not within a Project Component. Cultural Resources identified in this table includes those resources eligible, designated on the National Register, California Register, or identified by the City of Cupertino in the 2000‐2020 General Plan. Site 18 and 22 are confidential locations. Source: Tom Origer & Associates, 2013; City of Cupertino 2000‐2020 General Plan, 2005. Page 5
#*
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
%&'(280
|ÿ82
%&'(280
%&'(280
|ÿ85
!(71
1/2 milewest
2-1216-17
!(1
!(13
!(14
!(15
!(19
!(20
!(21
!(23
!(24
!(25
!(26
!(27
!(28
!(29
!(30
!(31
!(32!(33
!(34
!(35
!(36
!(37
!(39
!(40
!(41 !(42 !(43
!(44
!(45
!(46
!(38
!(49
!(50
!(51
!(52
!(53
!(54
!(55
!(56
!(58
!(60
!(47
!(48
!(57!(59
!(61
!(62
!(63
!(64
!(65
!(66
!(67
!(68
!(69
!(70!(72
!(73
PRUNERIDGE AVE
BOLLI
N
G
E
R
R
DS BLANEY AVERAINBOW DR
BOLLINGER RDN STELLING RDNTANTAUAVEMCCLELLAN RD
S DE ANZA BLVDRAINBOW DRBUBB RDBLANEY AVEFOOTHILL BLVDN FOOTHILL BLVDN DE ANZA BLVDHOMESTEAD RD
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
STANTAUAVEPROSPE C T RD N WOLFE RDS WOLFE RDN BLANEY AVEBUBB RDBUBB RDS STELLING RDMILLER AVEMI
LLERAVENBLANEYAVE0 0.25 0.50.125
Miles
CULTURAL RESOURCESCITY OF CUPERTINO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING PROJECT
Figure 4.4-1Cultural Resources
Source: City of Cupertino, 2013; Tom Origer and Associates, 2014; PlaceWorks, 2014.
Sites 18 and 22 are prehistoric location and not shown herebecause their locations are confidential.NOTE:
General Plan and Zoning Conformance SitesProject ComponentsCity BoundarySphere of Influence
#*Cultural Resources
!(1 Cupertino Historically Significant Resources!(1 Office of Historic Preservation Directory Listings!(1 Recorded Cultural Resources
Page 6