Reso 143 File No. 35-:V 63
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 143
III WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received
the application of Richard Gonzales
for a VARIANCE for a rear yard of 111 where ordinance requires 202 ,
Lot 3, Tract 1946, Pringlewood
; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has, XXgxKUt . met the burden of proof re-
quired to support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the VARIANCE be,
ni.Exbu. , and the same is, $ , hereby recommended for approval to the
City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, xub$nxk
text uextErmmxamdxemnd/#/m zwh.ich.zavezatta hmdxh.:v:tozandzmadexaxpavk
hiangmfxamzExhadtzRA34
BE IT FURTHER RES
OLVED:
® That the report of findings attached hereto are approved and adopted;
and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties
affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupert _i._
State of California, this 22 day of July , 19 , by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Adamo, Fitzgerald, Leonard, Small, Snyder, Frolich
NAYS: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Rampy
/s/ Donald Frolich
Chairman of the Planning Comm.
ATTEST:
/s/ Robert S. Shook
Secretary of the Planning Commission
- 1 -
- - File No , 35-V-63
REPORT OF FINDINGS
Tre application for a VARIANCE on behalf of •
Richard Gonzales shows:
ti --
to That •there are special conditions or exceptional characte.rist:i.cs
in the nature of the property to be affected or that it s location, or
it ' s surroundings are such as will permit the Commission to make a deter-
mination that -a 'literal enforcement . of. the Ordinance would result in
practical difficulties or. unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; anc:
3. That the granting of the application will not materially affect
adversely the health or safety of persons_ residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property which is the-subject of the application,
and.. that, tile, use, of_ said, `property. in the, manner which. it is proposed to
be used will not be materially detrimental to the pu,o_lic; welfare or in-
jurious to the value of property or improvements located in said surr-
oundings.
•
•
•
•