Reso 173 410 File No. 39-V-63
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. .173
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received.
the application of STEVENS CREEK GARDEN CENTER for a VARIANCE to the
Sign Ordinance to allow a total sign area of 70 square feet where Or-
dinance allows 55 square feet;, and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to
support his said application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other
evidence. submibted, in his matter, : the application for the VARIANCE be
and the same is hereby recommended for appro'.al to the City Council of
the City of Cupertino for, appropriate action.
BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED:
That the report of findings attached hereto are approved and adopt-
ed, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the
parties affected by this decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Planning Commission of the City of Cu-
ll pertino, State of California, this 18th day of November, 1963, by the.
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Adamo, Rampy, Small, Snyder, Frolich
NOES: . Commissioners: Fitzgerald
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
/s/ Donald Frolich
.•.
Chairman, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
/s/ Robert S Shook
Secretary, Planning Commission
•
-1-
File No. 39-V-63
110
REP OR T."� Ij'INDING3
_
The application for. a VARIANCE on behalf. .of STEVENS CREEK GARDEN
CENTER shows : : : ..
1. That there are special conditions or exceptional characteris-
tics in the nature of the property to be affected or that it 's location,
or it 's surroundings_ are such, as .will permit.;the Commission to make a
determination that a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would' result.
in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment.. of,: substantial property rights; and:.
3. : That the granting of . the .application will not •materially.. affect.
adversely the health or safety. of persons residing or working .in the
neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the application,
and that the use of said property in the manner which it is proposed
to be used will not be materially detrimental 'to ' the public welfare
or injurious ..to._ the value of property or improvements located ,in said
surroundings.
•
-2-