CC 3-3-20 #11 De Anza Hotel Written Communications (updated 3-3-20)The following attachments are comments referenced in Attachment L of Item 11.
Attachments:
A: Late Comment Letter #1: Michael R. Lozeau, Lozeau Drury LLP (January 20, 2020)
B: Late Comment Letter #2: Michael Goolsby, Better Neighborhoods, Inc. (January 21, 2020)
C: Affidavit of Mailing for the Notice of Intent for the IS/MND, De Anza Hotel
January 20, 2020
Via E-Mail and Hand Delivery
Mayor Steven Scharf Gian Paolo Martire, Associate Planner
Vice Mayor Darcy Paul City of Cupertino
Councilmember Rod Sinks Community Development Department
Councilmember Liang Chao Planning Division
Councilmember Jon Willey 10300 Torre Avenue
Lauren Sapudar, Executive Assistant to City Council Cupertino, CA 95014
10300 Torre Avenue gianm@cupertino.org
Cupertino, CA 95014
citycouncil@cupertino.org
Grace Schmidt, City Clerk
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
cityclerk@cupertino.org
Re: Comment on the De Anza Hotel Project (GPA-2018-01, DP-2018-01, ASA-
2018-02, DA-2018-01, U-2018-02, EA-2018-03)
Dear Mayor Scharf, Honorable City Council Members, Ms. Schmidt and Mr. Martire:
I am writing on behalf of the Laborers International Union of North America, Local
Union No. 270 (“LIUNA”) and its members regarding the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration (collectively the “MND”) prepared for the De Anza Hotel Project (“Project”) (GPA-
2018-01, DP-2018-01, ASA-2018-02, DA-2018-01, U-2018-02, EA-2018-03) for Applicant
Sherly Kwok of De Anza Properties (“Applicant”), including all actions related or referring to
the proposed demolition of the existing commercial building and development of a hotel. The
Project site is located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard in the City of Cupertino, California.
APN: 326-10-061.
On August 1, 2019, our office submitted a CEQA and Land Use Notice Request on
behalf of LIUNA to Mr. Gian Paolo Martire, Mr. Benjamin Fu, and Ms. Grace Schmidt
requesting that the City of Cupertino (“City”) send us notice of any and all actions or hearings
related to activities undertaken, authorized, approved, permitted, licensed, or certified by the City
and any of its subdivisions on the Project. See Exhibit D. We did not receive notice of the
Attachment A
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 2 of 17
Planning Commission meeting held on December 10, 2019 at which the Planning Commission
considered recommending the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) to City Council for
adoption. These comments would have been submitted at that meeting and we would have
attended the meeting if we had received notice as requested.
After reviewing the Project and MND, it is evident that the MND is inadequate and fails
as an informational document because there is a “fair argument” that the Project may have
unmitigated adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, CEQA requires that the City of
Cupertino prepare an environmental impact report (“EIR”) for the Project pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq.
This comment has been prepared with the assistance of Certified Industrial Hygienist
Francis Offerman, PE, CIH, environmental consulting firm SWAPE, and noise expert Derek
Watry. Mr. Offermann’s comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A hereto and are
incorporated herein by reference and entirety. SWAPE’s comment and curriculum vitae are
attached as Exhibit B hereto and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Mr.
Watry’s comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit C hereto and are incorporated
herein by reference in their entirety.
I.PROJECT BACKGROUND
Applicant proposes to demolish the existing commercial building on the Project site and
construct a seven-story hotel with up to 156 rooms, a rooftop terrace, lounge, bar, ground-floor
conference facilities, a restaurant, and four levels of below-grade parking.
II.STANDING
Members of LIUNA Local 270 live, work, and/or recreate in the vicinity of the Project
Site. These members will suffer the impacts of a poorly executed or inadequately mitigated
Project, just as would the members of any nearby homeowners association, community group or
environmental group. LIUNA Local 270 members live and work in areas that will be affected by
traffic, noise, air pollution, wildlife impacts and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions generated
by the Project. Therefore, LIUNA Local 270 and its members have a direct interest in ensuring
that the Project is adequately analyzed and that its environmental and public health impacts are
mitigated to the fullest extent possible.
III.LEGAL STANDARDS
As the California Supreme Court has held, “[i]f no EIR has been prepared for a
nonexempt project, but substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the
project may result in significant adverse impacts, the proper remedy is to order preparation of an
EIR.” Communities for a Better Env’t v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th
310, 319-320 (CBE v. SCAQMD) (citing No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68,
75, 88; Brentwood Assn. for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491,
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 3 of 17
504–505). “Significant environmental effect” is defined very broadly as “a substantial or
potentially substantial adverse change in the environment.” Pub. Res. Code (“PRC”) § 21068;
see also 14 CCR § 15382. An effect on the environment need not be “momentous” to meet the
CEQA test for significance; it is enough that the impacts are “not trivial.” No Oil, Inc., 13 Cal.3d
at 83. “The ‘foremost principle’ in interpreting CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to
be read so as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable
scope of the statutory language.” Communities for a Better Env’t v. Cal. Res. Agency (2002) 103
Cal.App.4th 98, 109 (CBE v. CRA).
The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of
Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 (Bakersfield Citizens); Pocket Protectors v. City
of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927. The EIR is an “environmental ‘alarm bell’
whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before
they have reached the ecological points of no return.” Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at
1220. The EIR also functions as a “document of accountability,” intended to “demonstrate to an
apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological
implications of its action.” Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988)
47 Cal.3d 376, 392. The EIR process “protects not only the environment but also informed self-
government.” Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.
An EIR is required if “there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before
the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.” PRC §
21080(d); see also Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927. In very limited circumstances, an
agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a negative declaration, a written statement briefly
indicating that a project will have no significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 CCR § 15371),
only if there is not even a “fair argument” that the project will have a significant environmental
effect. PRC, §§ 21100, 21064. Since “[t]he adoption of a negative declaration . . . has a terminal
effect on the environmental review process,” by allowing the agency “to dispense with the duty
to prepare an EIR],” negative declarations are allowed only in cases where “the proposed
project will not affect the environment at all.” Citizens of Lake Murray v. San Diego (1989) 129
Cal.App.3d 436, 440.
Where an initial study shows that the project may have a significant effect on the
environment, a mitigated negative declaration may be appropriate. However, a mitigated
negative declaration is proper only if the project revisions would avoid or mitigate the potentially
significant effects identified in the initial study “to a point where clearly no significant effect on
the environment would occur, and…there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record
before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the
environment.” PRC §§ 21064.5 and 21080(c)(2); Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130
Cal.App.4th 322, 331. In that context, “may” means a reasonable possibility of a significant
effect on the environment. PRC §§ 21082.2(a), 21100, 21151(a); Pocket Protectors, 124
Cal.App.4th at 927; League for Protection of Oakland's etc. Historic Res. v. City of Oakland
1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904–05.
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 4 of 17
Under the “fair argument” standard, an EIR is required if any substantial evidence in the
record indicates that a project may have an adverse environmental effect—even if contrary
evidence exists to support the agency’s decision. 14 CCR § 15064(f)(1); Pocket Protectors, 124
Cal.App.4th at 931; Stanislaus Audubon Society v. County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th
144, 150-51; Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th
1597, 1602. The “fair argument” standard creates a “low threshold” favoring environmental
review through an EIR rather than through issuance of negative declarations or notices of
exemption from CEQA. Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928.
The “fair argument” standard is virtually the opposite of the typical deferential standard
accorded to agencies. As a leading CEQA treatise explains:
This ‘fair argument’ standard is very different from the standard normally followed
by public agencies in making administrative determinations. Ordinarily, public
agencies weigh the evidence in the record before them and reach a decision based
on a preponderance of the evidence. [Citations]. The fair argument standard, by
contrast, prevents the lead agency from weighing competing evidence to determine
who has a better argument concerning the likelihood or extent of a potential
environmental impact. The lead agency’s decision is thus largely legal rather than
factual; it does not resolve conflicts in the evidence but determines only whether
substantial evidence exists in the record to support the prescribed fair argument.
Kostka & Zishcke, Practice Under CEQA, §6.29, pp. 273-274. The Courts have explained that
it is a question of law, not fact, whether a fair argument exists, and the courts owe no deference
to the lead agency’s determination. Review is de novo, with a preference for resolving doubts in
favor of environmental review.” Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 928 (emphasis in
original).
CEQA requires that an environmental document include a description of the project’s
environmental setting or “baseline.” CEQA Guidelines § 15063(d)(2). The CEQA “baseline” is
the set of environmental conditions against which to compare a project’s anticipated impacts.
CBE v. SCAQMD, 48 Cal.4th at 321. CEQA Guidelines section 15125(a) states, in pertinent part,
that a lead agency’s environmental review under CEQA:
must include a description of the physical environmental conditions in the
vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time [environmental analysis] is
commenced, from both a local and regional perspective. This environmental
setting will normally constitute the baseline physical conditions by which a Lead
Agency determines whether an impact is significant.
See Save Our Peninsula Committee v. County of Monterey (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 124–25
Save Our Peninsula”).) As the court of appeal has explained, “the impacts of the project must
be measured against the ‘real conditions on the ground,’” and not against hypothetical permitted
levels. Id. at 121–23.
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 5 of 17
III. DISCUSSION
A. There is Substantial Evidence of a Fair Argument that the Project Will Have a
Significant Health Risk Impact from its Indoor Air Quality Impacts.
Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis “Bud” Offermann, PE, CIH, has conducted a
review of the proposed Project and relevant documents regarding the Project’s indoor air
emissions. Indoor Environmental Engineering Comments (Jan. 16, 2020) (Exhibit A). Mr.
Offermann concludes that it is likely that the Project will expose future hotel employees of the
Project to significant impacts related to indoor air quality, and in particular, emissions of the
cancer-causing chemical formaldehyde. Mr. Offermann is a leading expert on indoor air quality
and has published extensively on the topic. See attached CV.
Mr. Offermann explains that many composite wood products used in modern hotel
construction contain formaldehyde-based glues which off-gas formaldehyde over a very long
time period. He states, “The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood
products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density
fiberboard, and particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for
flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims.” Ex.
A, pp. 2-3.
Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen. Mr. Offermann states that there is a fair
argument that the employees of the Project are expected to experience significant work-day
exposures. Id. p. 4. This exposure of employees would result in “significant cancer risks resulting
from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly
found in offices, warehouses, residences and hotels.” Id. Assuming they work eight hour days,
five days per week, an employee would be exposed to a cancer risk of approximately 16.4 per
million, assuming all materials are compliant with the California Air Resources Board’s
formaldehyde airborne toxics control measure. Id. This is more than the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk of 10
per million. Id.
Mr. Offermann also notes that the high cancer risk that may be posed by the Project’s
indoor air emissions likely will be exacerbated by the additional cancer risk that exists as a result
of the Project’s location near roadways with moderate to high traffic (i.e. I-280, Homestead
Road, Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road) and the high levels of PM2.5 already present in the ambient
air. Ex. A, p. 10. No analysis has been conducted of the significant cumulative health impacts
that will result to employees working at the Project.
Mr. Offermann concludes that this significant environmental impact should be analyzed
in an EIR and mitigation measures should be imposed to reduce the risk of formaldehyde
exposure. Id. Mr. Offermann identifies mitigation measures that are available to reduce these
significant health risks, including the installation of air filters and a requirement that the
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 6 of 17
applicant use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density
fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-
added formaldehyde (NAF) resins or ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins in the
buildings’ interiors. Id., pp. 11-12.
The City has a duty to investigate issues relating to a project’s potential environmental
impacts, especially those issues raised by an expert’s comments. See Cty. Sanitation Dist. No. 2
v. Cty. of Kern, (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1597–98 (“under CEQA, the lead agency bears a
burden to investigate potential environmental impacts”). In addition to assessing the Project’s
potential health impacts to workers, Mr. Offermann identifies the investigatory path that the City
should be following in developing an EIR to more precisely evaluate the Projects’ future
formaldehyde emissions and establishing mitigation measures that reduce the cancer risk below
the BAAQMD level. Id., pp. 4-9. Such an analysis would be similar in form to the air quality
modeling and traffic modeling typically conducted as part of a CEQA review.
The failure to address the project’s formaldehyde emissions is contrary to the California
Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Ass’n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt.
Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 386 (“CBIA”). At issue in CBIA was whether the Air District could
enact CEQA guidelines that advised lead agencies that they must analyze the impacts of adjacent
environmental conditions on a project. The Supreme Court held that CEQA does not generally
require lead agencies to consider the environment’s effects on a project. CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800-
801. However, to the extent a project may exacerbate existing adverse environmental conditions
at or near a project site, those would still have to be considered pursuant to CEQA. Id. at 801
CEQA calls upon an agency to evaluate existing conditions in order to assess whether a project
could exacerbate hazards that are already present”). In so holding, the Court expressly held that
CEQA’s statutory language required lead agencies to disclose and analyze “impacts on a
project’s users or residents that arise from the project’s effects on the environment.” Id. at 800
emphasis added).
The carcinogenic formaldehyde emissions identified by Mr. Offermann are not an
existing environmental condition. Those emissions to the air will be from the Project. Employees
will be users of the hotel. Currently, there is presumably little if any formaldehyde emissions at
the site. Once the project is built, emissions will begin at levels that pose significant health risks.
Rather than excusing the City from addressing the impacts of carcinogens emitted into the indoor
air from the project, the Supreme Court in CBIA expressly finds that this type of effect by the
project on the environment and a “project’s users and residents” must be addressed in the CEQA
process.
The Supreme Court’s reasoning is well-grounded in CEQA’s statutory language. CEQA
expressly includes a project’s effects on human beings as an effect on the environment that must
be addressed in an environmental review. “Section 21083(b)(3)’s express language, for example,
requires a finding of a ‘significant effect on the environment’ (§ 21083(b)) whenever the
environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly.’” CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800 (emphasis in original). Likewise, “the
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 7 of 17
Legislature has made clear—in declarations accompanying CEQA’s enactment—that public
health and safety are of great importance in the statutory scheme.” Id., citing e.g., §§ 21000,
subds. (b), (c), (d), (g), 21001, subds. (b), (d). It goes without saying that the hundreds of future
employees of the project are human beings and the health and safety of those workers is as
important to CEQA’s safeguards as nearby residents currently living near the project site.
Because Mr. Offermann’s expert review is substantial evidence of a fair argument of a
significant environmental impact to future users of the project, an EIR must be prepared to
disclose and mitigate those impacts.
B. The IS/MND Fails to Adequately Mitigate the Potential Adverse Impacts of the
Project on Wildlife by Window Collisions.
The IS/MND states that the Project “would alter the physical characteristics of the site;
however, this change is not expected to contribute to a substantial increase in the risk of
collisions to local and migratory birds.” IS/MND, p. 4-22. We had wildlife expert, Dr. Shawn
Smallwood, review the analysis of bird collision impacts and mitigation measures. Dr.
Smallwood concurs with the implementation of the identified mitigation measures but believes
they must include a post-construction fatality monitoring component in order to ensure their
effectiveness. In order to inform of whether and to what degree fatality reduction measures or
compensation measures might be needed to mitigate bird collisions with windows, Dr.
Smallwood recommends adding a requirement that the Project conduct weekly fatality searches
and a qualified biologist integrate carcass detection trials into the fatality searches to estimate a
carcass detection rate. Dr. Smallwood’s recommended fatality monitoring strategy will inform
whether or not the mitigation measures identified in the MND actually address any potential
significant bird collision impacts.
C. The IS/MND Failed to Adequately Analyze the Project’s Construction Emission
Impacts.
SWAPE reviewed the IS/MND and construction emission analysis and found that the
IS/MND incorrectly analyzed these emissions. The BAAQMD provides significance thresholds
to evaluate air pollution emissions in the form of pounds per day. In order to compare the
Project’s air pollutant emissions to these thresholds, the IS/MND stated that “[a]verage daily
emissions are based on the annual construction emissions divided by the total number of active
construction days.” IS/MND, p. 4-11. However, SWAPE states that the IS/MND’s conversion of
annual emissions measured in tons per year to pounds per year and then divided by the number
of construction workdays is incorrect. Ex. B, p. 2.
California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) provides three types of output files
winter, summer, and annual. Winter and summer output files provide emissions estimates in
pounds per day while the annual output files measure emissions in tons per year. Id. CEQA
requires the most conservative analysis, and the use of converted annual CalEEMod output files
may underestimate emissions. SWAPE therefore concludes that the IS/MND’s conversion from
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 8 of 17
the annual tons per year to pounds per day was unsubstantiated and incorrect, and the IS/MND
should have provided and utilized emissions from the winter or summer CalEEMod output files
in order to compare to the BAAQMD thresholds. Id.
D. The IS/MND Relied on Unsubstantiated Input Parameters to Estimate Project
Emissions and Thus Failed to Adequately Analyze the Project’s Air Quality
Impacts.
The IS/MND for the Project relies on emissions calculated from CalEEMod.2016.3.2.
This model relies on recommended default values, or on site-specific information related to a
number of factors. The model is used to generate a project’s construction and operational
emissions. SWAPE reviewed the Project’s CalEEMod output files and found that the values
input into the model were inconsistent with information provided in the IS/MND, resulting in an
underestimation of the Project’s emissions. Id. The particular errors identified by SWAPE are
discussed below. These errors should be corrected in a subsequent CEQA document prior to
approval of the Project.
1. The IS/MND relies on the use of an underestimated land use size.
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the floor surface area values of
the proposed parking lot and hotel land uses were underestimated within the model, and as a
result, may underestimate the Project’s emissions. Id. According to the IS/MND, the Project
proposes to construct an 18,000 square-foot driveway and surface parking lot and a 129,000
square-foot hotel building. IS/MND, p. 3-25. However, the CalEEMod output files reveals that
only 860 square feet of the parking lot and only 122,256 square feet of the hotel were included in
the model. IS/MND Revised App. A, pp 93, 135. By underestimating the floor surface areas of
the proposed parking lot and hotel land uses, the model underestimates the Project’s construction
and operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
2. The IS/MND relies on unsubstantiated changes to intensity factors.
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model’s CO2 intensity factor
was artificially reduced from 641.35 to 10.84, the CH4 intensity factor was reduced from 0.029 to
0, and the N2O intensity factor was reduced from 0.006 to 0. IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 96,
138, Ex. B, p. 3. According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the
justification provided for this change is that “Carbon Intensity factors adjusted for Silicon Valley
Clean Energy Power.” IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 94, 136. Furthermore, the IS states that
Silicon Valley Clean Energy will supply electricity to the Project site. IS/MND, p. 4-30.
However, neither the IS/MND nor its associated appendices provide a citation or further
justification for the updated carbon intensity factors. Ex. B, p. 4. Without any evidence
supporting this, reliance on these reductions violates CEQA.
3. The IS/MND fails to include the total amount of material export.
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 9 of 17
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the IS/MND’s model failed to
include the total amount of material export expected to occur during Project construction. Id.
According to the IS/MND, “[t]he proposed Project would require up to 72,000 cubic yards of
cut.” IS/MND, p. 3-25. However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that only
71,054 cubic yards of material export were included in the model. IS/MND Revised App. A, pp.
95, 137, Ex. B, p. 4. The underestimation of 946 cubic yards of material export presents an issue,
as the inclusion of the entire amount of material export within the model is necessary to calculate
the emissions produced from material movement, including truck loading and unloading, and
additional hauling truck trips. Ex. B, p. 4. As a result of the IS/MND failing to include the total
amount of material export, emissions generated during Project construction may be
underestimated.
4. The IS/MND relies on unsubstantiated changes to pieces of construction
equipment.
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the number of several pieces of
construction equipment were reduced to zero. IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 95, 138, Ex. B, p. 4.
According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided
for these changes is: “No grading soil haul equipment.” IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 94, 136.
However, this change is not mentioned or justified in the IS/MND and associated appendices.
Without any evidence supporting this, reliance on these reductions violates CEQA.
5. The IS/MND relies on unsubstantiated changes to fleet fix.
The CalEEMod output files demonstrate that several fleet mix percentage values were
manually altered. IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 95, 137, Ex. B, p. 5. The explanation provided in
the file is: “Refer to CalEEMod inputs fleet mix.” IS/MND Revised App. A, p. 94. But neither
the IS/MND nor the associated appendices mention or justify these changes. Ex. B, p. 5. Without
any evidence supporting this, reliance on the model violates CEQA.
6. The IS/MND relies on unsubstantiated changes to wastewater treatment system
percentages.
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the wastewater treatment system
percentages were manually altered. IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 96, 138, 139, Ex. B, p. 6. The
explanation provided is “Refer to CalEEMod inputs.” IS/MND Revised App. A, pp. 94, 136.
However, the IS/MND fails to justify this statement or mention the changes. According to the
CalEEMod User’s Guide, each type of wastewater treatment system is associated with different
GHG emission factors. Therefore, artificially altering the wastewater treatment system
percentages may result in an underestimation of the Project’s GHG emissions. Ex. B, p. 6.
Without any evidence supporting these changes, reliance on the model violates CEQA.
7. The IS/MND relies on an incorrect indoor water use rate.
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 10 of 17
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the indoor water use rate, used to
estimate the Project’s GHG emissions associated with the supply and treatment of water, was
incorrectly changed from the CalEEMod default value without sufficient justification. Id.
According to the IS/MND, “[t]he estimated water demand is 156 hotel rooms x 390 square foot
per room x 0.50 gpd/sf for a total of 30,420 gpd.” IS/MND, p. 4-93. Converted, this correlates
with an indoor water use rate of 11,103,300 gallons per year (gpy). Ex. B, p. 6. However, only
82,125 gpy were inputted into the model for the hotel land use. IS/MND Revised App. A, p. 138,
Ex. B, p. 6. The explanation provided is “Refer to CalEEMod inputs.” IS/MND Revised App. A,
p. 136. This fails to substantiate the changes or justify a different indoor water use rate than was
specified in the IS/MND. Ex. B, p. 7. Thus, the CalEEMod is incorrect and underestimates the
hotel land use’s indoor water use rate.
Further, while the IS/MND provides data on the hotel land use’s indoor water use rate, it
fails to provide an indoor water use rate for the Project’s other proposed land uses. Id. As a
result, the model may underestimate the Project’s water-related operational emissions.
8. The IS/MND relies on an unsubstantiated change to solid waste generation rates.
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the Project’s solid waste
generation rates were manually changed without adequate justification. IS/MND Revised App.
A, p. 138, Ex. B, p. 7. The explanation provided is “Refer to CalEEMod inputs.” IS/MND
Revised App. A, p. 136. However, the IS/MND fails to justify or mention these changes, and can
therefore not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
9. The IS/MND relies on an unsubstantiated application of a construction mitigation
measure.
Review of the CalEEMod output files reveals that the model includes a 9% reduction of
particulate matter emissions as a result of the “Clean Paved Roads” mitigation measure. IS/MND
Revised App. A, pp. 94, 134, Ex. B, p. 8. While the IS/MND mentions sweeping paved roads, it
does not justify or mention the 9% reduction. IS/MND, p. 4-11. As a result, the model may
underestimate the Project’s construction emissions and the mitigation cannot be relied upon.
10. The IS/MND relies on an unsubstantiated application of water-related operational
mitigation measures.
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the Project’s emissions were
modeled with several unsubstantiated water-related mitigation measures. IS/MND Revised App.
A, p. 129, Ex. B, p. 9. The Project’s operational emissions were modeled including the following
water-related mitigation measures: “Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet,” “Install Low Flow
Kitchen Faucet,” “Install Low Flow Toilet,” and “Install Low Flow Shower.” IS/MND Revised
App. A, p. 129. However, the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table fails to
mention or provide a justification for the inclusion of these mitigation measures and the IS/MND
fails to address these mitigation measures. As a result, the model cannot be relied upon to
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 11 of 17
determine Project significance.
E. The IS/MND Fails to Adequately Evaluate Health Risks from Diesel Particulate
Matter Emissions.
SWAPE’s review of the IS/MND and construction health risk assessment (“HRA”) found
that the IS/MND relies on an unsubstantiated air model that underestimates the Project’s
emissions and completely failed to conduct a quantified HRA for Project operation. Ex. B, pp. 9-
10. SWAPE concluded that the use of the construction related mitigation measures and the
failure to evaluate the operational health risk posed to nearby receptors to the Project is
inappropriate for several reasons.
First, the construction HRA relies on an unsubstantiated air model that underestimates the
Project’s emissions as discussed above. As a result, the IS/MND’s conclusion that, after
mitigation, the construction-related health risk to the maximally exposed individual receptor
would be approximately 5.1 in one million cannot be relied upon to determine the Project’s
significance.
Second, simply stating that the Project “would not result in creation of land uses that
would generate substantial concentrations of TACs” does not justify the omission of an
operational HRA. By failing to prepare an operational HRA, the IS/MND is inconsistent with
recommendations set forth by the Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment’s
OEHHA) most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health
Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015. “Risk Assessment Guidelines
Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015,
available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. The OEHHA
guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of a health risk
assessment. Id. Once construction of the Project is complete, the Project will operate for a long
period of time. During operation, the Project will generate vehicle trips, which will generate
additional exhaust emissions, thus continuing to expose nearby sensitive receptors to emissions.
The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months
should be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of
30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident
MEIR). Id. at 8-6, 8-15. Although the IS/MND did not provide the expected lifetime of the
Project, SWAPE reasonably assumes that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not
more. Therefore, SWAPE states that health risks from Project operation should have also been
evaluated in the IS/MND, as a 30-year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month
requirement set forth by OEHHA. Ex. B, p. 10.
Third, SWAPE found that the IS/MND failed to sum the cancer risk calculated for each
age group. Id. According to OEHHA guidance, “the excess cancer risk is calculated separately
for each age grouping and then summed to yield cancer risk at the receptor location.” “Guidance
Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 8-4. However, review of
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 12 of 17
the construction HRA conducted in the IS/MND failed to sum each age bin to evaluate the total
cancer risk over the course of the Project’s lifetime. Ex. B, p. 10. This is incorrect and an
updated analysis should quantify the Project’s construction and operational health risks and then
sum them to compare to the BAAQMD threshold of 10 in one million. Id., pp. 10-11, “California
Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-
pdf.pdf?la=en.
F. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project May have a Significant Health Risk
Impact.
Correcting the above errors, SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate
potential impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. SWAPE used
AERSCREEN, the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. Ex. B, pp. 11-14.
SWAPE used a sensitive receptor distance of 50 meters (the distance to the closest residential
receptor) and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA
guidance. Id., pp. 11-13.
SWAPE calculates that the Project’s construction and operation may pose cancer risks to
adults, children, and infants of approximately 21, 140, and 150 in one million, well above the
BAAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one million. Id., p. 14. The excess cancer risk over the
course of a residential lifetime calculated by SWAPE is 310 in one million, resulting in a
potentially significant health risk impact not previously addressed or identified by the IS/MND.
Id. These screening level calculations demonstrate that the Project’s construction and operational
diesel particulate matter emissions may result in a potentially significant health risk impact.
SWAPE’s screening-level HRA analysis and results can be found in Exhibit B, pp. 11-14.
G. The IS/MND Failed to Adequately Analyze Greenhouse Gas Impacts.
The IS/MND concludes that the Project’s GHG emissions would exceed the BAAQMD’s
bright line threshold, and subsequently proposes mitigation to find that the GHG emissions
impact would be less than significant. IS.MND, p. 4-39. The IS/MND also evaluates the
Project’s consistency with the CARB Scoping Plan, the Plan Bay Area 2040, and Cupertino’s
Climate Action Plan (“CAP”) to determine that the Project would have a less than significant
impact. Id., p. 4-40. However, SWAPE concludes that this analysis and subsequent less than
significant impact conclusion is incorrect for several reasons.
First, the CARB Scoping Plan and the Plan Bay Area cannot be relied upon to determine
project significance because they do not qualify as CAPs. Ex. B, p. 15. When CEQA Guidelines
sections 15064.4(b)(3) and 15183.5(b)(1) are read in conjunction, they make clear that qualified
GHG reduction plans, also known as CAPs, should require the following features: 1) inventory;
2) establish GHG reduction goals; 3) analyze project types; 4) craft performance based
mitigation measures; and 5) monitoring. Id., pp. 15-16. These CAP features provide the
necessary substantial evidence demonstrating a project’s incremental contribution is not
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 13 of 17
cumulatively considerable as required by CEQA Guidelines section 15064.4(b)(3). As SWAPE
points out, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate that the plans and policies include these 5 listed
requirements to be considered a qualified CAP for the City, leaving an analytical gap showing
that compliance with said plans can be used for a project-level significance determination. Id. at
16.
Second, the Project fails to demonstrate consistency with the Cupertino CAP. SWAPE
notes that the CAP fails to provide specific, project-level measures, and instead provides
community-wide” measures with quantified GHG reduction potentials. Id. Regardless of this,
the IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with all of the CAP’s “community-wide” measures
and associated GHG reduction potentials. See, id., pp. 16-20.
H. There is Substantial Evidence that the Project May have a Significant Greenhouse
Gas Impact.
The IS/MND’s GHG analysis is also flawed because it relies on an incorrect CalEEMod
model (discussed above), and cannot assume that the implementation of one mitigation measure
would reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to a less than significant level without quantifying
impacts. SWAPE ran an updated GHG analysis using the updated CalEEMod output files and
comparing the total Project’s GHG emissions, including construction emissions and operational
emissions, to the BAAQMD bright-line threshold of 1,100 MT CO2e/year and found that the
Project’s GHG emissions exceed the threshold.
SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase
Proposed
Project MT
CO2e/year)
Construction amortized over 30
years)34.85
Area 0.01
Energy 974.49
Mobile 1,183.11
Waste 47.71
Water 42.52
Total 2,282.69
Threshold 1,100
Exceed?Yes
When accurately modeled, SWAPE determined that the Project’s GHG emissions would
be approximately 2,283 MT CO2e/year. Ex. B, pp. 21-22. Since this exceeds the BAAQMD’s
1,100 MT CO2e/year threshold, a Tier 4 analysis is warranted. Id., p. 22. SWAPE divided the
Project’s GHG emissions by the service population value of 78 people to find that the Project
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 14 of 17
would emit approximately 29.3 MT CO2e/SP/year, which exceeds the BAAQMD 2030
substantial progress threshold of 2.6 MT CO2e/SP/year. Id. When accurately analyzed, the
Project’s total GHG emissions exceeds the “Substantial Progress” efficiency threshold for 2030,
thus resulting in a significant impact not previously assessed or identified in the IS/MND. Id.
SWAPE Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase
Proposed Project
MT CO2e/year)
Annual Emissions 2,282.69
Service Population 78
Service Population Efficiency 29.3
Threshold 2.6
Exceed?Yes
SWAPE concludes that due to these significant impacts and the failure of the IS/MND to
analyze all potential GHG emission impacts, an updated GHG analysis should be prepared in a
Project-specific EIR and additional mitigation measures should be incorporated into the Project.
Id.
I. The IS/MND Fails to Adequately Evaluate and Mitigate the Project’s Noise Impacts.
The comment of noise expert Derek Watry is attached as Exhibit D. Mr. Watry has
identified several issues with the IS/MND for the Project. His concerns are summarized below.
1. The MND fails to adequately evaluate construction noise levels.
Mr. Watry reviewed the proposed Project and relevant documents regarding the Project’s
noise impacts, and concludes that the IS/MND improperly analyzed construction noise levels.
Mr. Watry concludes that analyzed properly, construction noise levels during the five stages of
the Project construction would create a significant noise impact. Ex. D, p. 2.
The Cupertino Municipal Code (“CMC”) section 10.48.053 sets the quantitative
requirements for construction noise as: “. . . construction activities [may] not exceed 80 dBA at
the nearest affected property or individual equipment items do not exceed 87 dBA at 25 feet.
Only one of these two criteria must be met.” The IS/MND uses the first of these two options and
presents estimates of construction noise at the two nearest property lines shared with noise-
sensitive receptors. However, as Mr. Watry points out, “the [IS/MND] treats the 80 dBA limit as
a limit for the average noise level.” Ex. D, p.1. There is no indication in CMC section 10.48.053
that the code intended this limit to be for the average noise level limit, and “it is more likely that
the 80 dBA limit is intended to be a maximum for noise levels from the construction activities.”
Id.
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 15 of 17
Mr. Watry also noted that the IS/MND uses the Federal Highway Administration
Roadway Construction Noise Model to determine the data output for the Project’s noise levels.
However, the Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model shows the
maximum noise levels for construction phases at a distance of 200 feet while the construction
equipment used at the Project site will be closer than 200 feet to the Cupertino Hotel property
line. Id., p. 2. Mr. Watry used the attenuation with distance factor used in the IS/MND and the
closest approach point to the Cupertino Hotel property line to calculate the maximum noise
levels of the Project’s construction phases, shown below:
TABLE I Maximum Construction Noise Levels
Construction Phase Lmax Distance to 80 dBA Lmax
Demolition 93 dBA 150 ft
Site Preparation 88 dBA 89 ft
Grading 93 dBA 150 ft
Building Construction 87 dBA 80 ft
Paving 87 dBA 80 ft
Id. The table also shows the distance of the loudest piece of equipment in each phase will need to
be from the property to produce a maximum noise level of 80 dBA. As Mr. Watry notes, “[f]or
the demolition and grading phases, the distance is nearly half the width of the project site
indicating that the 80 dBA limit will be exceeded half of the time during these phases.”
Mr. Watry concludes that the City’s misinterpretation of the CMC led to an inadequate
noise impact analysis, and when properly analyzed the Project’s noise levels during five stages
of construction will create a significant noise impact. An EIR must therefore be prepared.
2. The MND fails to adequately mitigate the operational noise impacts.
The IS/MND concludes that the Project’s operational noise impacts would be potentially
significant but Mitigation Measure NOISE-2 would make that impact less than significant.
IS/MND, p. 4-63. However, Mitigation Measure NOISE-2 does not provide a substantive
analysis that feasible mitigation is possible. Ex. D, p. 3. Instead, it simply states that a qualified
acoustician will, at some point in the future, determine specific measures to reduce noise levels.
CEQA prohibits deferring the formulation of mitigation measures to post-approval
studies. CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B); Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202
Cal.App.3d 296, 308-309. An agency may only defer the formulation of mitigation measures
when it possesses “‘meaningful information’ reasonably justifying an expectation of
compliance.” Sundstrom at 308; see also Sacramento Old City Association v. City Council of
Sacramento (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1011, 1028-29 (mitigation measures may be deferred only
for kinds of impacts for which mitigation is known to be feasible”). A lead agency is precluded
from making the required CEQA findings unless the record shows that all uncertainties regarding
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 16 of 17
the mitigation of impacts have been resolved; an agency may not rely on mitigation measures of
uncertain efficacy or feasibility. Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221
Cal.App.3d 692, 727 (finding groundwater purchase agreement inadequate mitigation because
there was no evidence that replacement water was available). This approach helps “insure the
integrity of the process of decisionmaking by precluding stubborn problems or serious criticism
from being swept under the rug.” Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd Dist.
Agricultural Assn. (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929, 935.
Mr. Watry points out that the IS/MND attempts to minimize operational noise levels from
the generator including a Level II sound enclosure, but still found that the noise levels exceed the
adopted criteria. Ex. D, p. 3. Mr. Watry concludes that this “provides more impetus for
additional analysis to demonstrate that feasible mitigation is possible or to determine that the
impact is significant.” Id.
3. The IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate traffic noise levels.
For the traffic noise analysis, the IS/MND uses a relative, “audible” threshold of
significance and “only ‘audible’ changes in noise levels at sensitive receptor locations (i.e., 3
dBA or more) are considered potentially significant.” IS/MND, p. 4-58. Mr. Watry states that
t]he fundamental problem with using a relative threshold of significance, e.g., a change of 3
dBA or greater, is that, over time, there will effectively be no limit.” Ex. D, p. 3. In order to keep
noise levels from increasing continually without limit over time, Mr. Watry concludes that
absolute criteria should be used as well. Id., p. 4.
For this project, an appropriate source for absolute criteria is the Cupertino
General Plan – Community Vision 2015-2040. Chapter 7, Health and Safety
Element, contains Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments,
cast in terms of either the Day-Night Equivalent Level (Ldn) or the Community
Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), both 24-hour weighted average noise levels.
General Plan, Figure HS-8]. For various types of land uses, Figure HS-8
indicates if a particular noise exposure is “normally acceptable”, “conditionally
acceptable”, “normally unacceptable”, or “clearly unacceptable”. A very
reasonable, absolute threshold of significance would be if the noise level changed
from one classification to another, regardless of the amount of the increase.
Id.
Mr. Watry’s absolute criteria analysis would necessarily be based on measurements of
the existing noise environment around the Project site, which the IS/MND did not do in its noise
analysis.
IV. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the MND for the Project should be withdrawn, an EIR should
De Anza Hotel Project
January 20, 2020
Page 17 of 17
be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance
with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments.
Sincerely,
Michael R. Lozeau
Paige Fennie
Lozeau | Drury LLP
Exhibit A
INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
1448 Pine Street, Suite 103 San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: (415) 567-7700
E-mail: offermann@IEE-SF.com
http://www.iee-sf.com
Date: January 16, 2020
To: Michael Lozeau
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, California 94612
From: Francis J. Offermann PE CIH
Subject: Indoor Air Quality: De Anza Hotel – Cupertino, CA
IEE File Reference: P-4327)
Pages: 15
Indoor Air Quality Impacts
Indoor air quality (IAQ) directly impacts the comfort and health of building occupants,
and the achievement of acceptable IAQ in newly constructed and renovated buildings is a
well-recognized design objective. For example, IAQ is addressed by major high-
performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards
Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014). Indoor air quality in homes is particularly important
because occupants, on average, spend approximately ninety percent of their time indoors
with the majority of this time spent at home (EPA, 2011). Some segments of the
population that are most susceptible to the effects of poor IAQ, such as the very young
and the elderly, occupy their homes almost continuously. Additionally, an increasing
number of adults are working from home at least some of the time during the workweek.
Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other
business establishments.
The concentrations of many air pollutants often are elevated in homes and other buildings
relative to outdoor air because many of the materials and products used indoors contain
2
and release a variety of pollutants to air (Hodgson et al., 2002; Offermann and Hodgson,
2011). With respect to indoor air contaminants for which inhalation is the primary route
of exposure, the critical design and construction parameters are the provision of adequate
ventilation and the reduction of indoor sources of the contaminants.
Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Impact. In the California New Home Study (CNHS)
of 108 new homes in California (Offermann, 2009), 25 air contaminants were measured,
and formaldehyde was identified as the indoor air contaminant with the highest cancer risk
as determined by the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), No
Significant Risk Levels (NSRL) for carcinogens. The NSRL is the daily intake level
calculated to result in one excess case of cancer in an exposed population of 100,000 (i.e.,
ten in one million cancer risk) and for formaldehyde is 40 µg/day. The NSRL
concentration of formaldehyde that represents a daily dose of 40 µg is 2 µg/m3, assuming
a continuous 24-hour exposure, a total daily inhaled air volume of 20 m3, and 100%
absorption by the respiratory system. All of the CNHS homes exceeded this NSRL
concentration of 2 µg/m3. The median indoor formaldehyde concentration was 36 µg/m3,
and ranged from 4.8 to 136 µg/m3, which corresponds to a median exceedance of the 2
µg/m3 NSRL concentration of 18 and a range of 2.3 to 68.
Therefore, the cancer risk of a resident living in a California home with the median indoor
formaldehyde concentration of 36 µg/m3, is 180 per million as a result of formaldehyde
alone. The CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk is 10 per million, as
established by the Bay Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD, 2017).
Besides being a human carcinogen, formaldehyde is also a potent eye and respiratory
irritant. In the CNHS, many homes exceeded the non-cancer reference exposure levels
RELs) prescribed by California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
OEHHA, 2017b). The percentage of homes exceeding the RELs ranged from 98% for the
Chronic REL of 9 µg/m3 to 28% for the Acute REL of 55 µg/m3.
The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured
with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and
3
particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring,
cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims.
In January 2009, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted an airborne toxics
control measure (ATCM) to reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood
products, including hardwood plywood, particleboard, medium density fiberboard, and
also furniture and other finished products made with these wood products (California Air
Resources Board 2009). While this formaldehyde ATCM has resulted in reduced
emissions from composite wood products sold in California, they do not preclude that
homes built with composite wood products meeting the CARB ATCM will have indoor
formaldehyde concentrations that are below cancer and non-cancer exposure guidelines.
A follow up study to the California New Home Study (CNHS) was conducted in 2016-
2018 (Chan et. al., 2019), and found that the median indoor formaldehyde in new homes
built after 2009 with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials had lower indoor
formaldehyde concentrations, with a median indoor concentrations of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2
ppb) as compared to a median of 36 µg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS.
Thus, while new homes built after the 2009 CARB formaldehyde ATCM have a 38%
lower median indoor formaldehyde concentration and cancer risk, the median lifetime
cancer risk is still 112 per million for homes built with CARB compliant composite wood
products, which is more than 11 times the OEHHA 10 in a million cancer risk threshold
OEHHA, 2017a).
With respect to this project, the buildings in the De Anza Hotel Project in Cupertino, CA
consist of a hotel.
The employees of the hotel are expected to experience significant indoor exposures (e.g.,
40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year). These exposures for employees are anticipated to
result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the
building materials and furnishing commonly found in offices, warehouses, residences and
hotels.
4
Because the hotel will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM
materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the
indoor formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in
residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median
of 22.4 µg/m3 (Chan et. al., 2019)
Assuming that the hotel employees work 8 hours per day and inhale 20 m3 of air per day,
the formaldehyde dose per work-day at the offices is 149 µg/day.
Assuming that these employees work 5 days per week and 50 weeks per year for 45 years
start at age 20 and retire at age 65) the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose
is 65.8 µg/day.
This is 1.64 times the NSRL (OEHHA, 2017a) of 40 µg/day and represents a cancer risk
of 16.4 per million, which exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. This impact
should be analyzed in an environmental impact report (“EIR”), and the agency should
impose all feasible mitigation measures to reduce this impact. Several feasible mitigation
measures are discussed below and these and other measures should be analyzed in an
EIR.
While measurements of the indoor concentrations of formaldehyde in residences built
with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials (Chan et. al., 2018), indicate that
indoor formaldehyde concentrations in buildings built with similar materials (e.g. hotels,
residences, offices, warehouses, schools) will pose cancer risks in excess of the CEQA
cancer risk of 10 per million, a determination of the cancer risk that is specific to this
project and the materials used to construct these buildings can and should be conducted
prior to completion of the environmental review.
The following describes a method that should be used prior to construction in the
environmental review under CEQA, for determining whether the indoor concentrations
resulting from the formaldehyde emissions of the specific building materials/furnishings
5
selected for the building exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines. Such a design
analyses can be used to identify those materials/furnishings prior to the completion of the
City’s CEQA review and project approval, that have formaldehyde emission rates that
contribute to indoor concentrations that exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, so that
alternative lower emitting materials/furnishings may be selected and/or higher minimum
outdoor air ventilation rates can be increased to achieve acceptable indoor concentrations
and incorporated as mitigation measures for this project.
Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment.
This formaldehyde emissions assessment should be used in the environmental review
under CEQA to assess the indoor formaldehyde concentrations from the proposed
loading of building materials/furnishings, the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate
data for building materials/furnishings, and the design minimum outdoor air ventilation
rates. This assessment allows the applicant (and the City) to determine before the
conclusion of the environmental review process and the building materials/furnishings
are specified, purchased, and installed if the total chemical emissions will exceed cancer
and non-cancer guidelines, and if so, allow for changes in the selection of specific
material/furnishings and/or the design minimum outdoor air ventilations rates such that
cancer and non-cancer guidelines are not exceeded.
1.) Define Indoor Air Quality Zones. Divide the building into separate indoor air quality
zones, (IAQ Zones). IAQ Zones are defined as areas of well-mixed air. Thus, each
ventilation system with recirculating air is considered a single zone, and each room or
group of rooms where air is not recirculated (e.g. 100% outdoor air) is considered a
separate zone. For IAQ Zones with the same construction material/furnishings and design
minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. (e.g. hotel rooms, apartments, condominiums,
etc.) the formaldehyde emission rates need only be assessed for a single IAQ Zone of that
type.
2.) Calculate Material/Furnishing Loading. For each IAQ Zone, determine the building
material and furnishing loadings (e.g., m2 of material/m2 floor area, units of
furnishings/m2 floor area) from an inventory of all potential indoor formaldehyde
6
sources, including flooring, ceiling tiles, furnishings, finishes, insulation, sealants,
adhesives, and any products constructed with composite wood products containing urea-
formaldehyde resins (e.g., plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard).
3.) Calculate the Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each building material, calculate the
formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) from the product of the area-specific formaldehyde
emission rate (µg/m2-h) and the area (m2) of material in the IAQ Zone, and from each
furnishing (e.g. chairs, desks, etc.) from the unit-specific formaldehyde emission rate
µg/unit-h) and the number of units in the IAQ Zone.
NOTE: As a result of the high-performance building rating systems and building codes
California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014), most manufacturers
of building materials furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate
tests using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and
Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using
Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017), or other equivalent chemical emission rate
testing methods. Most manufacturers of building furnishings sold in the United States
conduct chemical emission rate tests using ANSI/BIFMA M7.1 Standard Test Method for
Determining VOC Emissions (BIFMA, 2018), or other equivalent chemical emission rate
testing methods.
CDPH, BIFMA, and other chemical emission rate testing programs, typically certify that
a material or furnishing does not create indoor chemical concentrations in excess of the
maximum concentrations permitted by their certification. For instance, the CDPH
emission rate testing requires that the measured emission rates when input into an office,
school, or residential model do not exceed one-half of the OEHHA Chronic Exposure
Guidelines (OEHHA, 2017b) for the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in
Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017). These certifications themselves do
not provide the actual area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (i.e., µg/m2-h) of the
product, but rather provide data that the formaldehyde emission rates do not exceed the
maximum rate allowed for the certification. Thus for example, the data for a certification
of a specific type of flooring may be used to calculate that the area-specific emission rate
of formaldehyde is less than 31 µg/m2-h, but not the actual measured specific emission
7
rate, which may be 3, 18, or 30 µg/m2-h. These area-specific emission rates determined
from the product certifications of CDPH, BIFA, and other certification programs can be
used as an initial estimate of the formaldehyde emission rate.
If the actual area-specific emission rates of a building material or furnishing is needed
i.e. the initial emission rates estimates from the product certifications are higher than
desired), then that data can be acquired by requesting from the manufacturer the complete
chemical emission rate test report. For instance if the complete CDPH emission test
report is requested for a CDHP certified product, that report will provide the actual area-
specific emission rates for not only the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed
in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017), but also all of the cancer and
reproductive/developmental chemicals listed in the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor
Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), all of the toxic air contaminants (TACs) in the California Air
Resources Board Toxic Air Contamination List (CARB, 2011), and the 10 chemicals
with the greatest emission rates.
Alternatively, a sample of the building material or furnishing can be submitted to a
chemical emission rate testing laboratory, such as Berkeley Analytical Laboratory
https://berkeleyanalytical.com), to measure the formaldehyde emission rate.
4.) Calculate the Total Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the
total formaldehyde emission rate (i.e. µg/h) from the individual formaldehyde emission
rates from each of the building material/furnishings as determined in Step 3.
5.) Calculate the Indoor Formaldehyde Concentration. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the
indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3) from Equation 1 by dividing the total
formaldehyde emission rates (i.e. µg/h) as determined in Step 4, by the design minimum
outdoor air ventilation rate (m3/h) for the IAQ Zone.
Equation
1) where: Cin = indoor formaldehyde concentration (
8
Etotal = total formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) into the IAQ Zone.
Qoa = design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone (m3/h)
The above Equation 1 is based upon mass balance theory, and is referenced in Section
3.10.2 “Calculation of Estimated Building Concentrations” of the California Department
of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical
Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017).
6.) Calculate the Indoor Exposure Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Risks. For each IAQ
Zone, calculate the cancer and non-cancer health risks from the indoor formaldehyde
concentrations determined in Step 5 and as described in the OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots
Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk
Assessments (OEHHA, 2015).
7.) Mitigate Indoor Formaldehyde Exposures of exceeding the CEQA Cancer and/or
Non-Cancer Health Risks. In each IAQ Zone, provide mitigation for any formaldehyde
exposure risk as determined in Step 6, that exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per
million or the CEQA non-cancer Hazard Quotient of 1.0.
Provide the source and/or ventilation mitigation required in all IAQ Zones to reduce the
health risks of the chemical exposures below the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health
risks.
Source mitigation for formaldehyde may include:
1.) reducing the amount materials and/or furnishings that emit formaldehyde
2.) substituting a different material with a lower area-specific emission rate of
formaldehyde
Ventilation mitigation for formaldehyde emitted from building materials and/or
furnishings may include:
1.) increasing the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone.
NOTE: Mitigating the formaldehyde emissions through use of less material/furnishings,
9
or use of lower emitting materials/furnishings, is the preferred mitigation option, as
mitigation with increased outdoor air ventilation increases initial and operating costs
associated with the heating/cooling systems.
Further, we are not asking that the builder to “speculate” on what and how much composite
materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on
the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California
Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile
Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”,
CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building
Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials
selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde.
Outdoor Air Ventilation Impact. Another important finding of the CNHS, was that the
outdoor air ventilation rates in the homes were very low. Outdoor air ventilation is a very
important factor influencing the indoor concentrations of air contaminants, as it is the
primary removal mechanism of all indoor air generated air contaminants. Lower outdoor
air exchange rates cause indoor generated air contaminants to accumulate to higher indoor
air concentrations. Many homeowners rarely open their windows or doors for ventilation
as a result of their concerns for security/safety, noise, dust, and odor concerns (Price,
2007). In the CNHS field study, 32% of the homes did not use their windows during the
24 hour Test Day, and 15% of the homes did not use their windows during the entire
preceding week. Most of the homes with no window usage were homes in the winter field
session. Thus, a substantial percentage of homeowners never open their windows,
especially in the winter season. The median 24 hour measurement was 0.26 ach, with a
range of 0.09 ach to 5.3 ach. A total of 67% of the homes had outdoor air exchange rates
below the minimum California Building Code (2001) requirement of 0.35 ach. Thus, the
relatively tight envelope construction, combined with the fact that many people never
open their windows for ventilation, results in homes with low outdoor air exchange rates
and higher indoor air contaminant concentrations.
10
The De Anza Hotel Project – Cupertino CA is close to roads with moderate to high traffic
e.g. I-280, Homestead Road, Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road, etc.). As a result of the outdoor
vehicle traffic noise, the Project site is likely to be a sound impacted site. The noise
analyses provided in the Public Review Draft Initial Study (Placeworks, 2019), does not
report the existing plus project noise levels (e.g. CNEL, Ldn), rather this report simply
reports what the increase in the existing noise levels caused by the Project.
As a result of the high outdoor noise levels, the current project will require the need for
mechanical supply of outdoor air ventilation air to allow for a habitable interior
environment with closed windows and doors. Such a ventilation system would allow
windows and doors to be kept closed at the occupant’s discretion to control exterior noise
within building interiors.
PM2.5 Outdoor Concentrations Impact. An additional impact of the nearby motor vehicle
traffic associated with this project, are the outdoor concentrations of PM2.5. According to
the Public Review Draft Initial Study (Placeworks, 2019), this Project is located in the San
Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, which is a State and Federal non-attainment area for PM2.5.
An air quality analyses should to be conducted to determine the concentrations of PM2.5 in
the outdoor and indoor air that people inhale each day. This air quality analyses needs to
consider the cumulative impacts of the project related emissions, existing and projected
future emissions from local PM2.5 sources (e.g. stationary sources, motor vehicles, and
airport traffic) upon the outdoor air concentrations at the project site. If the outdoor
concentrations are determined to exceed the California and National annual average PM2.5
exceedence concentration of 12 µg/m3, or the National 24-hour average exceedence
concentration of 35 µg/m3, then the buildings need to have a mechanical supply of outdoor
air that has air filtration with sufficient PM2.5 removal efficiency, such that the indoor
concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles is less than the California and National PM2.5
annual and 24-hour standards.
It is my experience that based on the projected high traffic noise levels, the annual average
concentration of PM2.5 will exceed the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour
11
standards and warrant installation of high efficiency air filters (i.e. MERV 13 or higher) in
all mechanically supplied outdoor air ventilation systems.
Indoor Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures
The following are recommended mitigation measures to minimize the impacts upon
indoor quality:
indoor formaldehyde concentrations
outdoor air ventilation
PM2.5 outdoor air concentrations
Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Mitigation. Use only composite wood materials (e.g.
hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish
systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins or
ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins (CARB, 2009). Other projects such as the
AC by Marriott Hotel – West San Jose Project (Asset Gas SC Inc.) and 2525 North Main
Street, Santa Ana (AC 2525 Main LLC, 2019) have entered into settlement agreements
stipulating the use of composite wood materials only containing NAF or ULEF resins.
Alternatively, conduct the previously described Pre-Construction Building
Material/Furnishing Chemical Emissions Assessment, to determine that the combination
of formaldehyde emissions from building materials and furnishings do not create indoor
formaldehyde concentrations that exceed the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks.
It is important to note that we are not asking that the builder to “speculate” on what and how
much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood
materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct
using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and
Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using
Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier (i.e.
Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to
12
insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off
gassing of formaldehyde.
Outdoor Air Ventilation Mitigation. Provide each habitable room with a continuous
mechanical supply of outdoor air that meets or exceeds the California 2016 Building
Energy Efficiency Standards (California Energy Commission, 2015) requirements of the
greater of 15 cfm/occupant or 0.15 cfm/ft2 of floor area. Following installation of the
system conduct testing and balancing to insure that required amount of outdoor air is
entering each habitable room and provide a written report documenting the outdoor
airflow rates. Do not use exhaust only mechanical outdoor air systems, use only balanced
outdoor air supply and exhaust systems or outdoor air supply only systems. Provide a
manual for the occupants or maintenance personnel, that describes the purpose of the
mechanical outdoor air system and the operation and maintenance requirements of the
system.
PM2.5 Outdoor Air Concentration Mitigation. Install air filtration with sufficient PM2.5
removal efficiency (e.g. MERV 13 or higher) to filter the outdoor air entering the
mechanical outdoor air supply systems, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor
PM2.5 particles are less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour
standards. Install the air filters in the system such that they are accessible for replacement
by the occupants or maintenance personnel. Include in the mechanical outdoor air
ventilation system manual instructions on how to replace the air filters and the estimated
frequency of replacement.
References
AC 2525 Main LLC. 2019. Environmental Settlement Agreement with Laborers’
International Union of North America Local 652.
Asset Gas SC. Inc. 2019. Settlement Agreement and Release with Jose Mexicano,
Alejandro Martinez, and Laborers’ International Union of North America Local 652.
13
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. California Environmental
Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, San
Francisco, CA. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-
research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en
BIFA. 2018. BIFMA Product Safety and Performance Standards and Guidelines.
www.bifma.org/page/standardsoverview
California Air Resources Board. 2009. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Reduce
Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products. California Environmental
Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/compwood07/fro-final.pdf
California Air Resources Board. 2011. Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List.
California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm
California Building Code. 2001. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2 Volume
1, Appendix Chapter 12, Interior Environment, Division 1, Ventilation, Section 1207:
2001 California Building Code, California Building Standards Commission. Sacramento,
CA.
California Building Standards Commission (2014). 2013 California Green Building
Standards Code. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11. California Building
Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx.
California Energy Commission, 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for
Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2015publications/CEC-400-2015-037/CEC-400-2015-037-
CMF.pdf
14
CDPH. 2017. Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions
for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1. California Department of Public
Health, Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/
DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx.
Chan, W., Kim, Y., Singer, B., and Walker I. 2019. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in
New California Homes with Gas Appliances and Mechanical Ventilation. Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, Energy Technologies Area, LBNL-2001200, DOI:
10.20357/B7QC7X.
EPA. 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, Chapter 16 – Activity Factors.
Report EPA/600/R-09/052F, September 2011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C.
Hodgson, A. T., D. Beal, J.E.R. McIlvaine. 2002. Sources of formaldehyde, other
aldehydes and terpenes in a new manufactured house. Indoor Air 12: 235–242.
OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015. Air Toxics Hot
Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health
Risk Assessments.
OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2017a. Proposition 65
Safe Harbor Levels. No Significant Risk Levels for Carcinogens and Maximum Allowable
Dose Levels for Chemicals Causing Reproductive Toxicity. Available at:
http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/safeharbor081513.pdf
OEHHA - Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2017b. All OEHHA
Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. Available at:
http://oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html
Offermann, F. J. 2009. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes. California Air
Resources Board and California Energy Commission, PIER Energy Related
15
Environmental Research Program. Collaborative Report. CEC 500 2009 085.
https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/04-310.pdf
Offermann, F. J. and A. T. Hodgson. 2011. Emission Rates of Volatile Organic
Compounds in New Homes. Proceedings Indoor Air 2011 (12th International Conference
on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011), June 5-10, 2011, Austin, TX USA.
Placeworks. 2019. Public Review Draft Initial Study, The De Anza Hotel Project.
Price, Phillip P., Max Sherman, Robert H. Lee, and Thomas Piazza. 2007. Study of
Ventilation Practices and Household Characteristics in New California Homes.
California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2007-033. Final Report, ARB
Contract 03-326. Available at: www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/03-326.pdf.
USGBC. 2014. LEED BD+C Homes v4. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C.
http://www.usgbc.org/credits/homes/v4
Francis (Bud) J. Offermann III PE, CIH
Indoor Environmental Engineering
1448 Pine Street, Suite 103, San Francisco, CA 94109
Phone: 415-567-7700
Email: Offermann@iee-sf.com
http://www.iee-sf.com
Education
M.S. Mechanical Engineering (1985)
Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Graduate Studies in Air Pollution Monitoring and Control (1980)
University of California, Berkeley, CA.
B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (1976)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.
Professional Experience
President: Indoor Environmental Engineering, San Francisco, CA. December, 1981 -
present.
Direct team of environmental scientists, chemists, and mechanical engineers in
conducting State and Federal research regarding indoor air quality instrumentation
development, building air quality field studies, ventilation and air cleaning performance
measurements, and chemical emission rate testing.
Provide design side input to architects regarding selection of building materials and
ventilation system components to ensure a high quality indoor environment.
Direct Indoor Air Quality Consulting Team for the winning design proposal for the new
State of Washington Ecology Department building.
Develop a full-scale ventilation test facility for measuring the performance of air
diffusers; ASHRAE 129, Air Change Effectiveness, and ASHRAE 113, Air Diffusion
Performance Index.
Develop a chemical emission rate testing laboratory for measuring the chemical
emissions from building materials, furnishings, and equipment.
Principle Investigator of the California New Homes Study (2005-2007). Measured
ventilation and indoor air quality in 108 new single family detached homes in northern
and southern California.
Develop and teach IAQ professional development workshops to building owners,
managers, hygienists, and engineers.
2
Air Pollution Engineer: Earth Metrics Inc., Burlingame, CA, October, 1985 to March,
1987.
Responsible for development of an air pollution laboratory including installation a forced
choice olfactometer, tracer gas electron capture chromatograph, and associated
calibration facilities. Field team leader for studies of fugitive odor emissions from sewage
treatment plants, entrainment of fume hood exhausts into computer chip fabrication
rooms, and indoor air quality investigations.
Staff Scientist: Building Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Program, Energy and
Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. January, 1980 to
August, 1984.
Deputy project leader for the Control Techniques group; responsible for laboratory and
field studies aimed at evaluating the performance of indoor air pollutant control strategies
i.e. ventilation, filtration, precipitation, absorption, adsorption, and source control).
Coordinated field and laboratory studies of air-to-air heat exchangers including
evaluation of thermal performance, ventilation efficiency, cross-stream contaminant
transfer, and the effects of freezing/defrosting.
Developed an in situ test protocol for evaluating the performance of air cleaning systems
and introduced the concept of effective cleaning rate (ECR) also known as the Clean Air
Delivery Rate (CADR).
Coordinated laboratory studies of portable and ducted air cleaning systems and their
effect on indoor concentrations of respirable particles and radon progeny.
Co-designed an automated instrument system for measuring residential ventilation rates
and radon concentrations.
Designed hardware and software for a multi-channel automated data acquisition system
used to evaluate the performance of air-to-air heat transfer equipment.
Assistant Chief Engineer: Alta Bates Hospital, Berkeley, CA, October, 1979 to January,
1980.
Responsible for energy management projects involving installation of power factor
correction capacitors on large inductive electrical devices and installation of steam meters
on physical plant steam lines. Member of Local 39, International Union of Operating
Engineers.
Manufacturing Engineer: American Precision Industries, Buffalo, NY, October, 1977 to
October, 1979.
3
Responsible for reorganizing the manufacturing procedures regarding production of shell
and tube heat exchangers. Designed customized automatic assembly, welding, and testing
equipment. Designed a large paint spray booth. Prepared economic studies justifying new
equipment purchases. Safety Director.
Project Engineer: Arcata Graphics, Buffalo, N.Y. June, 1976 to October, 1977.
Responsible for the design and installation of a bulk ink storage and distribution system
and high speed automatic counting and marking equipment. Also coordinated material
handling studies which led to the purchase and installation of new equipment.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
Chairman of SPC-145P, Standards Project Committee - Test Method for Assessing
the Performance of Gas Phase Air Cleaning Equipment (1991-1992)
Member SPC-129P, Standards Project Committee - Test Method for Ventilation
Effectiveness (1986-97)
Member of Drafting Committee
Member Environmental Health Committee (1992-1994, 1997-2001, 2007-2010)
Chairman of EHC Research Subcommittee
Member of Man Made Mineral Fiber Position Paper Subcommittee
Member of the IAQ Position Paper Committee
Member of the Legionella Position Paper Committee
Member of the Limiting Indoor Mold and Dampness in Buildings Position Paper
Committee
Member SSPC-62, Standing Standards Project Committee - Ventilation for
Acceptable Indoor Air Quality (1992 to 2000)
Chairman of Source Control and Air Cleaning Subcommittee
Chairman of TC-4.10, Indoor Environmental Modeling (1988-92)
Member of Research Subcommittee
Chairman of TC-2.3, Gaseous Air Contaminants and Control Equipment (1989-92)
Member of Research Subcommittee
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
D-22 Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheres
Member of Indoor Air Quality Subcommittee
E-06 Performance of Building Constructions
American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH)
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
Bioaerosols Committee (2007-2013)
4
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)
Cal-OSHA Indoor Air Quality Advisory Committee
International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ)
Co-Chairman of Task Force on HVAC Hygiene
U. S. Green Building Council (USGBC)
Member of the IEQ Technical Advisory Group (2007-2009)
Member of the IAQ Performance Testing Work Group (2010-2012)
Western Construction Consultants (WESTCON)
PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS
Licensed Professional Engineer - Mechanical Engineering
Certified Industrial Hygienist - American Board of Industrial Hygienists
SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS AND SYMPOSIA
Biological Contamination, Diagnosis, and Mitigation, Indoor Air’90, Toronto, Canada,
August, 1990.
Models for Predicting Air Quality, Indoor Air’90, Toronto, Canada, August, 1990.
Microbes in Building Materials and Systems, Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July,
1993.
Microorganisms in Indoor Air Assessment and Evaluation of Health Effects and Probable
Causes, Walnut Creek, CA, February 27, 1997.
Controlling Microbial Moisture Problems in Buildings, Walnut Creek, CA, February 27,
1997.
Scientific Advisory Committee, Roomvent 98, 6th International Conference on Air
Distribution in Rooms, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, June 14-17, 1998.
Moisture and Mould, Indoor Air ’99, Edinburgh, Scotland, August, 1999.
Ventilation Modeling and Simulation, Indoor Air ’99, Edinburgh, Scotland, August,
1999.
Microbial Growth in Materials, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August, 2000.
5
Co-Chair, Bioaerosols X- Exposures in Residences, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, CA, July
2002.
Healthy Indoor Environments, Anaheim, CA, April 2003.
Chair, Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Multi-Family Homes, Indoor Air 2008,
Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2008.
Co-Chair, ISIAQ Task Force Workshop; HVAC Hygiene, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey,
CA, July 2002.
Chair, ETS in Multi-Family Housing: Exposures, Controls, and Legalities Forum,
Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse, CA, September 14, 2009.
Chair, Energy Conservation and IAQ in Residences Workshop, Indoor Air 2011, Austin,
TX, June 6, 2011.
Chair, Electronic Cigarettes: Chemical Emissions and Exposures Colloquium, Indoor Air
2016, Ghent, Belgium, July 4, 2016.
SPECIAL CONSULTATION
Provide consultation to the American Home Appliance Manufacturers on the
development of a standard for testing portable air cleaners, AHAM Standard AC-1.
Served as an expert witness and special consultant for the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission regarding the performance claims found in advertisements of portable air
cleaners and residential furnace filters.
Conducted a forensic investigation for a San Mateo, CA pro se defendant, regarding an
alleged homicide where the victim was kidnapped in a steamer trunk. Determined the air
exchange rate in the steamer trunk and how long the person could survive.
Conducted in situ measurement of human exposure to toluene fumes released during
nailpolish application for a plaintiffs attorney pursuing a California Proposition 65
product labeling case. June, 1993.
Conducted a forensic in situ investigation for the Butte County, CA Sheriff’s Department
of the emissions of a portable heater used in the bedroom of two twin one year old girls
who suffered simultaneous crib death.
Consult with OSHA on the 1995 proposed new regulation regarding indoor air quality
and environmental tobacco smoke.
6
Consult with EPA on the proposed Building Alliance program and with OSHA on the
proposed new OSHA IAQ regulation.
Johnson Controls Audit/Certification Expert Review; Milwaukee, WI. May 28-29, 1997.
Winner of the nationally published 1999 Request for Proposals by the State of
Washington to conduct a comprehensive indoor air quality investigation of the
Washington State Department of Ecology building in Lacey, WA.
Selected by the State of California Attorney General’s Office in August, 2000 to conduct
a comprehensive indoor air quality investigation of the Tulare County Court House.
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory IAQ Experts Workshop: “Cause and Prevention of Sick
Building Problems in Offices: The Experience of Indoor Environmental Quality
Investigators”, Berkeley, California, May 26-27, 2004.
Provide consultation and chemical emission rate testing to the State of California
Attorney General’s Office in 2013-2015 regarding the chemical emissions from e-
cigarettes.
PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS :
F.J.Offermann, C.D.Hollowell, and G.D.Roseme, "Low-Infiltration Housing in
Rochester, New York: A Study of Air Exchange Rates and Indoor Air Quality,"
Environment International, 8, pp. 435-445, 1982.
W.W.Nazaroff, F.J.Offermann, and A.W.Robb, "Automated System for Measuring Air
Exchange Rate and Radon Concentration in Houses," Health Physics, 45, pp. 525-537,
1983.
F.J.Offermann, W.J.Fisk, D.T.Grimsrud, B.Pedersen, and K.L.Revzan, "Ventilation
Efficiencies of Wall- or Window-Mounted Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers,"
ASHRAE Annual Transactions, 89-2B, pp 507-527, 1983.
W.J.Fisk, K.M.Archer, R.E Chant, D. Hekmat, F.J.Offermann, and B.Pedersen, "Onset of
Freezing in Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers," ASHRAE Annual Transactions, 91-
1B, 1984.
W.J.Fisk, K.M.Archer, R.E Chant, D. Hekmat, F.J.Offermann, and B.Pedersen,
Performance of Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers During Operation with Freezing
and Periodic Defrosts," ASHRAE Annual Transactions, 91-1B, 1984.
F.J.Offermann, R.G.Sextro, W.J.Fisk, D.T.Grimsrud, W.W.Nazaroff, A.V.Nero, and
K.L.Revzan, "Control of Respirable Particles with Portable Air Cleaners," Atmospheric
Environment, Vol. 19, pp.1761-1771, 1985.
7
R.G.Sextro, F.J.Offermann, W.W.Nazaroff, A.V.Nero, K.L.Revzan, and J.Yater,
Evaluation of Indoor Control Devices and Their Effects on Radon Progeny
Concentrations," Atmospheric Environment, 12, pp. 429-438, 1986.
W.J. Fisk, R.K.Spencer, F.J.Offermann, R.K.Spencer, B.Pedersen, R.Sextro, "Indoor Air
Quality Control Techniques," Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey, (1987).
F.J.Offermann, "Ventilation Effectiveness and ADPI Measurements of a Forced Air
Heating System," ASHRAE Transactions , Volume 94, Part 1, pp 694-704, 1988.
F.J.Offermann and D. Int-Hout "Ventilation Effectiveness Measurements of Three
Supply/Return Air Configurations," Environment International , Volume 15, pp 585-592
1989.
F.J. Offermann, S.A. Loiselle, M.C. Quinlan, and M.S. Rogers, "A Study of Diesel Fume
Entrainment in an Office Building," IAQ '89, The Human Equation: Health and
Comfort, pp 179-183, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1989.
R.G.Sextro and F.J.Offermann, "Reduction of Residential Indoor Particle and Radon
Progeny Concentrations with Ducted Air Cleaning Systems," submitted to Indoor Air,
1990.
S.A.Loiselle, A.T.Hodgson, and F.J.Offermann, "Development of An Indoor Air Sampler
for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds", Indoor Air , Vol 2, pp 191-210, 1991.
F.J.Offermann, S.A.Loiselle, A.T.Hodgson, L.A. Gundel, and J.M. Daisey, "A Pilot
Study to Measure Indoor Concentrations and Emission Rates of Polycyclic Aromatic
Compounds", Indoor Air , Vol 4, pp 497-512, 1991.
F.J. Offermann, S. A. Loiselle, R.G. Sextro, "Performance Comparisons of Six Different
Air Cleaners Installed in a Residential Forced Air Ventilation System," IAQ'91, Healthy
Buildings, pp 342-350, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA (1991).
F.J. Offermann, J. Daisey, A. Hodgson, L. Gundell, and S. Loiselle, "Indoor
Concentrations and Emission Rates of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds", Indoor Air,
Vol 4, pp 497-512 (1992).
F.J. Offermann, S. A. Loiselle, R.G. Sextro, "Performance of Air Cleaners Installed in a
Residential Forced Air System," ASHRAE Journal, pp 51-57, July, 1992.
F.J. Offermann and S. A. Loiselle, "Performance of an Air-Cleaning System in an
Archival Book Storage Facility," IAQ'92, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1992.
S.B. Hayward, K.S. Liu, L.E. Alevantis, K. Shah, S. Loiselle, F.J. Offermann, Y.L.
Chang, L. Webber, “Effectiveness of Ventilation and Other Controls in Reducing
Exposure to ETS in Office Buildings,” Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July 4-8, 1993.
8
F.J. Offermann, S. A. Loiselle, G. Ander, H. Lau, "Indoor Contaminant Emission Rates
Before and After a Building Bake-out," IAQ'93, Operating and Maintaining Buildings for
Health, Comfort, and Productivity, pp 157-163, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
L.E. Alevantis, Hayward, S.B., Shah, S.B., Loiselle, S., and Offermann, F.J. "Tracer Gas
Techniques for Determination of the Effectiveness of Pollutant Removal From Local
Sources," IAQ '93, Operating and Maintaining Buildings for Health, Comfort, and
Productivity, pp 119-129, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1993.
L.E. Alevantis, Liu, L.E., Hayward, S.B., Offermann, F.J., Shah, S.B., Leiserson, K.
Tsao, E., and Huang, Y., "Effectiveness of Ventilation in 23 Designated Smoking Areas
in California Buildings," IAQ '94, Engineering Indoor Environments, pp 167-181,
ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1994.
L.E. Alevantis, Offermann, F.J., Loiselle, S., and Macher, J.M., “Pressure and Ventilation
Requirements of Hospital Isolation Rooms for Tuberculosis (TB) Patients: Existing
Guidelines in the United States and a Method for Measuring Room Leakage”, Ventilation
and Indoor air quality in Hospitals, M. Maroni, editor, Kluwer Academic publishers,
Netherlands, 1996.
F.J. Offermann, M. A. Waz, A.T. Hodgson, and H.M. Ammann, "Chemical Emissions
from a Hospital Operating Room Air Filter," IAQ'96, Paths to Better Building
Environments, pp 95-99, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1996.
F.J. Offermann, "Professional Malpractice and the Sick Building Investigator," IAQ'96,
Paths to Better Building Environments, pp 132-136, ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 1996.
F.J. Offermann, “Standard Method of Measuring Air Change Effectiveness,” Indoor Air,
Vol 1, pp.206-211, 1999.
F. J. Offermann, A. T. Hodgson, and J. P. Robertson, “Contaminant Emission Rates from
PVC Backed Carpet Tiles on Damp Concrete”, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland,
August 2000.
K.S. Liu, L.E. Alevantis, and F.J. Offermann, “A Survey of Environmental Tobacco
Smoke Controls in California Office Buildings”, Indoor Air, Vol 11, pp. 26-34, 2001.
F.J. Offermann, R. Colfer, P. Radzinski, and J. Robertson, “Exposure to Environmental
Tobacco Smoke in an Automobile”, Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, California, July 2002.
F. J. Offermann, J.P. Robertson, and T. Webster, “The Impact of Tracer Gas Mixing on
Airflow Rate Measurements in Large Commercial Fan Systems”, Indoor Air 2002,
Monterey, California, July 2002.
M. J. Mendell, T. Brennan, L. Hathon, J.D. Odom, F.J.Offermann, B.H. Turk, K.M.
Wallingford, R.C. Diamond, W.J. Fisk, “Causes and prevention of Symptom Complaints
9
in Office Buildings: Distilling the Experience of Indoor Environmental Investigators”,
submitted to Indoor Air 2005, Beijing, China, September 4-9, 2005.
F.J. Offermann, “Ventilation and IAQ in New Homes With and Without Mechanical
Outdoor Air Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse, CA, September 14, 2009.
F.J. Offermann, “ASHRAE 62.2 Intermittent Residential Ventilation: What’s It Good
For, Intermittently Poor IAQ”, IAQVEC 2010, Syracuse, CA, April 21, 2010.
F.J. Offermann and A.T. Hodgson, “Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in
New Homes”, Indoor Air 2011, Austin, TX, June, 2011.
P. Jenkins, R. Johnson, T. Phillips, and F. Offermann, “Chemical Concentrations in New
California Homes and Garages”, Indoor Air 2011, Austin, TX, June, 2011.
W. J. Mills, B. J. Grigg, F. J. Offermann, B. E. Gustin, and N. E. Spingarm, “Toluene and
Methyl Ethyl Ketone Exposure from a Commercially Available Contact Adhesive”,
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 9:D95-D102 May, 2012.
F. J. Offermann, R. Maddalena, J. C. Offermann, B. C. Singer, and H, Wilhelm, “The
Impact of Ventilation on the Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in
Residences”, HB 2012, Brisbane, AU, July, 2012.
F. J. Offermann, A. T. Hodgson, P. L. Jenkins, R. D. Johnson, and T. J. Phillips,
Attached Garages as a Source of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes”, HB
2012, Brisbane, CA, July, 2012.
R. Maddalena, N. Li, F. Offermann, and B. Singer, “Maximizing Information from
Residential Measurements of Volatile Organic Compounds”, HB 2012, Brisbane, AU,
July, 2012.
W. Chen, A. Persily, A. Hodgson, F. Offermann, D. Poppendieck, and K. Kumagai,
Area-Specific Airflow Rates for Evaluating the Impacts of VOC emissions in U.S.
Single-Family Homes”, Building and Environment, Vol. 71, 204-211, February, 2014.
F. J. Offermann, A. Eagan A. C. Offermann, and L. J. Radonovich, “Infectious Disease
Aerosol Exposures With and Without Surge Control Ventilation System Modifications”,
Indoor Air 2014, Hong Kong, July, 2014.
F. J. Offermann, “Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes: Direct and Indirect Passive
Exposures”, Building and Environment, Vol. 93, Part 1, 101-105, November, 2015.
F. J. Offermann, “Formaldehyde Emission Rates From Lumber Liquidators Laminate
Flooring Manufactured in China”, Indoor Air 2016, Belgium, Ghent, July, 2016.
F. J. Offermann, “Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde Emission Rates for E-Cigarettes”,
Indoor Air 2016, Belgium, Ghent, July, 2016.
10
OTHER REPORTS:
W.J.Fisk, P.G.Cleary, and F.J.Offermann, "Energy Saving Ventilation with Residential
Heat Exchangers," a Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory brochure distributed by the
Bonneville Power Administration, 1981.
F.J.Offermann, J.R.Girman, and C.D.Hollowell, "Midway House Tightening Project: A
Study of Indoor Air Quality," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report
LBL-12777, 1981.
F.J.Offermann, J.B.Dickinson, W.J.Fisk, D.T.Grimsrud, C.D.Hollowell, D.L.Krinkle, and
G.D.Roseme, "Residential Air-Leakage and Indoor Air Quality in Rochester, New York,"
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-13100, 1982.
F.J.Offermann, W.J.Fisk, B.Pedersen, and K.L.Revzan, Residential Air-to-Air Heat
Exchangers: A Study of the Ventilation Efficiencies of Wall- or Window- Mounted
Units," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-14358, 1982.
F.J.Offermann, W.J.Fisk, W.W.Nazaroff, and R.G.Sextro, "A Review of Portable Air
Cleaners for Controlling Indoor Concentrations of Particulates and Radon Progeny," An
interim report for the Bonneville Power Administration, 1983.
W.J.Fisk, K.M.Archer, R.E.Chant, D.Hekmat, F.J.Offermann, and B.S. Pedersen,
Freezing in Residential Air-to-Air Heat Exchangers: An Experimental Study," Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-16783, 1983.
R.G.Sextro, W.W.Nazaroff, F.J.Offermann, and K.L.Revzan, "Measurements of Indoor
Aerosol Properties and Their Effect on Radon Progeny," Proceedings of the American
Association of Aerosol Research Annual Meeting, April, 1983.
F.J.Offermann, R.G.Sextro, W.J.Fisk, W.W. Nazaroff, A.V.Nero, K.L.Revzan, and
J.Yater, "Control of Respirable Particles and Radon Progeny with Portable Air Cleaners,"
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-16659, 1984.
W.J.Fisk, R.K.Spencer, D.T.Grimsrud, F.J.Offermann, B.Pedersen, and R.G.Sextro,
Indoor Air Quality Control Techniques: A Critical Review," Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-16493, 1984.
F.J.Offermann, J.R.Girman, and R.G.Sextro, "Controlling Indoor Air Pollution from
Tobacco Smoke: Models and Measurements,", Indoor Air, Proceedings of the 3rd
International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol 1, pp 257-264, Swedish
Council for Building Research, Stockholm (1984), Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory,
Berkeley, CA, Report LBL-17603, 1984.
11
R.Otto, J.Girman, F.Offermann, and R.Sextro,"A New Method for the Collection and
Comparison of Respirable Particles in the Indoor Environment," Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Special Director Fund's Study, 1984.
A.T.Hodgson and F.J.Offermann, "Examination of a Sick Office Building," Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, an informal field study, 1984.
R.G.Sextro, F.J.Offermann, W.W.Nazaroff, and A.V.Nero, "Effects of Aerosol
Concentrations on Radon Progeny," Aerosols, Science, & Technology, and Industrial
Applications of Airborne Particles, editors B.Y.H.Liu, D.Y.H.Pui, and H.J.Fissan, p525,
Elsevier, 1984.
K.Sexton, S.Hayward, F.Offermann, R.Sextro, and L.Weber, "Characterization of
Particulate and Organic Emissions from Major Indoor Sources, Proceedings of the Third
International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Stockholm, Sweden, August
20-24, 1984.
F.J.Offermann, "Tracer Gas Measurements of Laboratory Fume Entrainment at a Semi-
Conductor Manufacturing Plant," an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report,
1986.
F.J.Offermann, "Tracer Gas Measurements of Ventilation Rates in a Large Office
Building," an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1986.
F.J.Offermann, "Measurements of Volatile Organic Compounds in a New Large Office
Building with Adhesive Fastened Carpeting," an Indoor Environmental Engineering
R&D Report, 1986.
F.J.Offermann, "Designing and Operating Healthy Buildings", an Indoor Environmental
Engineering R&D Report, 1986.
F.J.Offermann, "Measurements and Mitigation of Indoor Spray-Applicated Pesticides",
an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report, 1988.
F.J.Offermann and S. Loiselle, "Measurements and Mitigation of Indoor Mold
Contamination in a Residence", an Indoor Environmental Engineering R&D Report,
1989.
F.J.Offermann and S. Loiselle, "Performance Measurements of an Air Cleaning System
in a Large Archival Library Storage Facility", an Indoor Environmental Engineering
R&D Report, 1989.
F.J. Offermann, J.M. Daisey, L.A. Gundel, and A.T. Hodgson, S. A. Loiselle, "Sampling,
Analysis, and Data Validation of Indoor Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons", Final Report, Contract No. A732-106, California Air Resources Board,
March, 1990.
12
L.A. Gundel, J.M. Daisey, and F.J. Offermann, "A Sampling and Analytical Method for
Gas Phase Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons", Proceedings of the 5th International
Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Indoor Air '90, July 29-August 1990.
A.T. Hodgson, J.M. Daisey, and F.J. Offermann "Development of an Indoor Sampling
and Analytical Method for Particulate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons", Proceedings
of the 5th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Indoor Air '90,
July 29-August, 1990.
F.J. Offermann, J.O. Sateri, “Tracer Gas Measurements in Large Multi-Room Buildings”,
Indoor Air ’93, Helsinki, Finland, July 4-8, 1993.
F.J.Offermann, M. T. O’Flaherty, and M. A. Waz “Validation of ASHRAE 129 -
Standard Method of Measuring Air Change Effectiveness”, Final Report of ASHRAE
Research Project 891, December 8, 1997.
S.E. Guffey, F.J. Offermann et. al., “Proceedings of the Workshop on Ventilation
Engineering Controls for Environmental Tobacco smoke in the Hospitality Industry”,
U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration and ACGIH,
1998.
F.J. Offermann, R.J. Fiskum, D. Kosar, and D. Mudaari, “A Practical Guide to
Ventilation Practices & Systems for Existing Buildings”, Heating/Piping/Air
Conditioning Engineering supplement to April/May 1999 issue.
F.J. Offermann, P. Pasanen, “Workshop 18: Criteria for Cleaning of Air Handling
Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000.
F.J. Offermann, Session Summaries: Building Investigations, and Design &
Construction, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000.
F.J. Offermann, “The IAQ Top 10”, Engineered Systems, November, 2008.
L. Kincaid and F.J. Offermann, “Unintended Consequences: Formaldehyde Exposures in
Green Homes, AIHA Synergist, February, 2010.
F.J. Offermann, “ IAQ in Air Tight Homes”, ASHRAE Journal, November, 2010.
F.J. Offermann, “The Hazards of E-Cigarettes”, ASHRAE Journal, June, 2014.
PRESENTATIONS :
Low-Infiltration Housing in Rochester, New York: A Study of Air Exchange Rates and
Indoor Air Quality," Presented at the International Symposium on Indoor Air Pollution,
Health and Energy Conservation, Amherst, MA, October 13-16,1981.
13
Ventilation Efficiencies of Wall- or Window-Mounted Residential Air-to-Air Heat
Exchangers," Presented at the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air
Conditioning Engineers Summer Meeting, Washington, DC, June, 1983.
Controlling Indoor Air Pollution from Tobacco Smoke: Models and Measurements,"
Presented at the Third International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate,
Stockholm, Sweden, August 20-24, 1984.
Indoor Air Pollution: An Emerging Environmental Problem", Presented to the
Association of Environmental Professionals, Bar Area/Coastal Region 1, Berkeley, CA,
May 29, 1986.
Ventilation Measurement Techniques," Presented at the Workshop on Sampling and
Analytical Techniques, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, September 26,
1986 and September 25, 1987.
Buildings That Make You Sick: Indoor Air Pollution", Presented to the Sacramento
Association of Professional Energy Managers, Sacramento, CA, November 18, 1986.
Ventilation Effectiveness and Indoor Air Quality", Presented to the American Society of
Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers Northern Nevada Chapter, Reno,
NV, February 18, 1987, Golden Gate Chapter, San Francisco, CA, October 1, 1987, and
the San Jose Chapter, San Jose, CA, June 9, 1987.
Tracer Gas Techniques for Studying Ventilation," Presented at the Indoor Air Quality
Symposium, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, September 22-24, 1987.
Indoor Air Quality Control: What Works, What Doesn't," Presented to the Sacramento
Association of Professional Energy Managers, Sacramento, CA, November 17, 1987.
Ventilation Effectiveness and ADPI Measurements of a Forced Air Heating System,"
Presented at the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning
Engineers Winter Meeting, Dallas, Texas, January 31, 1988.
Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation, and Energy in Commercial Buildings", Presented at the
Building Owners &Managers Association of Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, July 21,
1988.
Controlling Indoor Air Quality: The New ASHRAE Ventilation Standards and How to
Evaluate Indoor Air Quality", Presented at a conference "Improving Energy Efficiency
and Indoor Air Quality in Commercial Buildings," National Energy Management
Institute, Reno, Nevada, November 4, 1988.
A Study of Diesel Fume Entrainment Into an Office Building," Presented at Indoor Air
89: The Human Equation: Health and Comfort, American Society of Heating,
Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, San Diego, CA, April 17-20, 1989.
14
Indoor Air Quality in Commercial Office Buildings," Presented at the Renewable
Energy Technologies Symposium and International Exposition, Santa Clara, CA June 20,
1989.
Building Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality", Presented to the San Joaquin Chapter of
the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers,
September 7, 1989.
How to Meet New Ventilation Standards: Indoor Air Quality and Energy Efficiency," a
workshop presented by the Association of Energy Engineers; Chicago, IL, March 20-21,
1989; Atlanta, GA, May 25-26, 1989; San Francisco, CA, October 19-20, 1989; Orlando,
FL, December 11-12, 1989; Houston, TX, January 29-30, 1990; Washington D.C.,
February 26-27, 1990; Anchorage, Alaska, March 23, 1990; Las Vegas, NV, April 23-24,
1990; Atlantic City, NJ, September 27-28, 1991; Anaheim, CA, November 19-20, 1991;
Orlando, FL, February 28 - March 1, 1991; Washington, DC, March 20-21, 1991;
Chicago, IL, May 16-17, 1991; Lake Tahoe, NV, August 15-16, 1991; Atlantic City, NJ,
November 18-19, 1991; San Jose, CA, March 23-24, 1992.
Indoor Air Quality," a seminar presented by the Anchorage, Alaska Chapter of the
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, March 23,
1990.
Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality", Presented at the 1990 HVAC & Building Systems
Congress, Santa, Clara, CA, March 29, 1990.
Ventilation Standards for Office Buildings", Presented to the South Bay Property
Managers Association, Santa Clara, May 9, 1990.
Indoor Air Quality", Presented at the Responsive Energy Technologies Symposium &
International Exposition (RETSIE), Santa Clara, CA, June 20, 1990.
Indoor Air Quality - Management and Control Strategies", Presented at the Association
of Energy Engineers, San Francisco Bay Area Chapter Meeting, Berkeley, CA,
September 25, 1990.
Diagnosing Indoor Air Contaminant and Odor Problems", Presented at the ASHRAE
Annual Meeting, New York City, NY, January 23, 1991.
Diagnosing and Treating the Sick Building Syndrome", Presented at the Energy 2001,
Oklahoma, OK, March 19, 1991.
Diagnosing and Mitigating Indoor Air Quality Problems" a workshop presented by the
Association of Energy Engineers, Chicago, IL, October 29-30, 1990; New York, NY,
January 24-25, 1991; Anaheim, April 25-26, 1991; Boston, MA, June 10-11, 1991;
Atlanta, GA, October 24-25, 1991; Chicago, IL, October 3-4, 1991; Las Vegas, NV,
December 16-17, 1991; Anaheim, CA, January 30-31, 1992; Atlanta, GA, March 5-6,
1992; Washington, DC, May 7-8, 1992; Chicago, IL, August 19-20, 1992; Las Vegas,
15
NV, October 1-2, 1992; New York City, NY, October 26-27, 1992, Las Vegas, NV,
March 18-19, 1993; Lake Tahoe, CA, July 14-15, 1994; Las Vegas, NV, April 3-4, 1995;
Lake Tahoe, CA, July 11-12, 1996; Miami, Fl, December 9-10, 1996.
Sick Building Syndrome and the Ventilation Engineer", Presented to the San Jose
Engineers Club, May, 21, 1991.
Duct Cleaning: Who Needs It ? How Is It Done ? What Are The Costs ?" What Are the
Risks ?, Moderator of Forum at the ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Indianapolis ID, June 23,
1991.
Operating Healthy Buildings", Association of Plant Engineers, Oakland, CA, November
14, 1991.
Duct Cleaning Perspectives", Moderator of Seminar at the ASHRAE Semi-Annual
Meeting, Indianapolis, IN, June 24, 1991.
Duct Cleaning: The Role of the Environmental Hygienist," ASHRAE Annual Meeting,
Anaheim, CA, January 29, 1992.
Emerging IAQ Issues", Fifth National Conference on Indoor Air Pollution, University of
Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, April 13-14, 1992.
International Symposium on Room Air Convection and Ventilation Effectiveness",
Member of Scientific Advisory Board, University of Tokyo, July 22-24, 1992.
Guidelines for Contaminant Control During Construction and Renovation Projects in
Office Buildings," Seminar paper at the ASHRAE Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, January
26, 1993.
Outside Air Economizers: IAQ Friend or Foe", Moderator of Forum at the ASHRAE
Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, January 26, 1993.
Orientation to Indoor Air Quality," an EPA two and one half day comprehensive indoor
air quality introductory workshop for public officials and building property managers;
Sacramento, September 28-30, 1992; San Francisco, February 23-24, 1993; Los Angeles,
March 16-18, 1993; Burbank, June 23, 1993; Hawaii, August 24-25, 1993; Las Vegas,
August 30, 1993; San Diego, September 13-14, 1993; Phoenix, October 18-19, 1993;
Reno, November 14-16, 1995; Fullerton, December 3-4, 1996; Fresno, May 13-14, 1997.
Building Air Quality: A Guide for Building Owners and Facility Managers," an EPA
one half day indoor air quality introductory workshop for building owners and facility
managers. Presented throughout Region IX 1993-1995.
Techniques for Airborne Disease Control”, EPRI Healthcare Initiative Symposium; San
Francisco, CA; June 7, 1994.
16
Diagnosing and Mitigating Indoor Air Quality Problems”, CIHC Conference; San
Francisco, September 29, 1994.
Indoor Air Quality: Tools for Schools,” an EPA one day air quality management
workshop for school officials, teachers, and maintenance personnel; San Francisco,
October 18-20, 1994; Cerritos, December 5, 1996; Fresno, February 26, 1997; San Jose,
March 27, 1997; Riverside, March 5, 1997; San Diego, March 6, 1997; Fullerton,
November 13, 1997; Santa Rosa, February 1998; Cerritos, February 26, 1998; Santa
Rosa, March 2, 1998.
ASHRAE 62 Standard “Ventilation for Acceptable IAQ”, ASCR Convention; San
Francisco, CA, March 16, 1995.
New Developments in Indoor Air Quality: Protocol for Diagnosing IAQ Problems”,
AIHA-NC; March 25, 1995.
Experimental Validation of ASHRAE SPC 129, Standard Method of Measuring Air
Change Effectiveness", 16th AIVC Conference, Palm Springs, USA, September 19-22,
1995.
Diagnostic Protocols for Building IAQ Assessment”, American Society of Safety
Engineers Seminar: ‘Indoor Air Quality – The Next Door’; San Jose Chapter, September
27, 1995; Oakland Chapter, 9, 1997.
Diagnostic Protocols for Building IAQ Assessment”, Local 39; Oakland, CA, October 3,
1995.
Diagnostic Protocols for Solving IAQ Problems”, CSU-PPD Conference; October 24,
1995.
Demonstrating Compliance with ASHRAE 62-1989 Ventilation Requirements”, AIHA;
October 25, 1995.
IAQ Diagnostics: Hands on Assessment of Building Ventilation and Pollutant
Transport”, EPA Region IX; Phoenix, AZ, March 12, 1996; San Francisco, CA, April 9,
1996; Burbank, CA, April 12, 1996.
Experimental Validation of ASHRAE 129P: Standard Method of Measuring Air Change
Effectiveness”, Room Vent ‘96 / International Symposium on Room Air Convection and
Ventilation Effectiveness"; Yokohama, Japan, July 16-19, 1996.
IAQ Diagnostic Methodologies and RFP Development”, CCEHSA 1996 Annual
Conference, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, August 2, 1996.
The Practical Side of Indoor Air Quality Assessments”, California Industrial Hygiene
Conference ‘96, San Diego, CA, September 2, 1996.
17
ASHRAE Standard 62: Improving Indoor Environments”, Pacific Gas and Electric
Energy Center, San Francisco, CA, October 29, 1996.
Operating and Maintaining Healthy Buildings”, April 3-4, 1996, San Jose, CA; July 30,
1997, Monterey, CA.
IAQ Primer”, Local 39, April 16, 1997; Amdahl Corporation, June 9, 1997; State
Compensation Insurance Fund’s Safety & Health Services Department, November 21,
1996.
Tracer Gas Techniques for Measuring Building Air Flow Rates”, ASHRAE,
Philadelphia, PA, January 26, 1997.
How to Diagnose and Mitigate Indoor Air Quality Problems”; Women in Waste; March
19, 1997.
Environmental Engineer: What Is It?”, Monte Vista High School Career Day; April 10,
1997.
Indoor Environment Controls: What’s Hot and What’s Not”, Shaklee Corporation; San
Francisco, CA, July 15, 1997.
Measurement of Ventilation System Performance Parameters in the US EPA BASE
Study”, Healthy Buildings/IAQ’97, Washington, DC, September 29, 1997.
Operations and Maintenance for Healthy and Comfortable Indoor Environments”,
PASMA; October 7, 1997.
Designing for Healthy and Comfortable Indoor Environments”, Construction
Specification Institute, Santa Rosa, CA, November 6, 1997.
Ventilation System Design for Good IAQ”, University of Tulsa 10th Annual Conference,
San Francisco, CA, February 25, 1998.
The Building Shell”, Tools For Building Green Conference and Trade Show, Alameda
County Waste Management Authority and Recycling Board, Oakland, CA, February 28,
1998.
Identifying Fungal Contamination Problems In Buildings”, The City of Oakland
Municipal Employees, Oakland, CA, March 26, 1998.
Managing Indoor Air Quality in Schools: Staying Out of Trouble”, CASBO,
Sacramento, CA, April 20, 1998.
Indoor Air Quality”, CSOOC Spring Conference, Visalia, CA, April 30, 1998.
Particulate and Gas Phase Air Filtration”, ACGIH/OSHA, Ft. Mitchell, KY, June 1998.
18
Building Air Quality Facts and Myths”, The City of Oakland / Alameda County Safety
Seminar, Oakland, CA, June 12, 1998.
Building Engineering and Moisture”, Building Contamination Workshop, University of
California Berkeley, Continuing Education in Engineering and Environmental
Management, San Francisco, CA, October 21-22, 1999.
Identifying and Mitigating Mold Contamination in Buildings”, Western Construction
Consultants Association, Oakland, CA, March 15, 2000; AIG Construction Defect
Seminar, Walnut Creek, CA, May 2, 2001; City of Oakland Public Works Agency,
Oakland, CA, July 24, 2001; Executive Council of Homeowners, Alamo, CA, August 3,
2001.
Using the EPA BASE Study for IAQ Investigation / Communication”, Joint
Professional Symposium 2000, American Industrial Hygiene Association, Orange County
Southern California Sections, Long Beach, October 19, 2000.
Ventilation,” Indoor Air Quality: Risk Reduction in the 21st Century Symposium,
sponsored by the California Environmental Protection Agency/Air Resources Board,
Sacramento, CA, May 3-4, 2000.
Workshop 18: Criteria for Cleaning of Air Handling Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2000,
Espoo, Finland, August 2000.
Closing Session Summary: ‘Building Investigations’ and ‘Building Design &
Construction’, Healthy Buildings 2000, Espoo, Finland, August 2000.
Managing Building Air Quality and Energy Efficiency, Meeting the Standard of Care”,
BOMA, MidAtlantic Environmental Hygiene Resource Center, Seattle, WA, May 23rd,
2000; San Antonio, TX, September 26-27, 2000.
Diagnostics & Mitigation in Sick Buildings: When Good Buildings Go Bad,” University
of California Berkeley, September 18, 2001.
Mold Contamination: Recognition and What To Do and Not Do”, Redwood Empire
Remodelers Association; Santa Rosa, CA, April 16, 2002.
Investigative Tools of the IAQ Trade”, Healthy Indoor Environments 2002; Austin, TX;
April 22, 2002.
Finding Hidden Mold: Case Studies in IAQ Investigations”, AIHA Northern California
Professionals Symposium; Oakland, CA, May 8, 2002.
Assessing and Mitigating Fungal Contamination in Buildings”, Cal/OSHA Training;
Oakland, CA, February 14, 2003 and West Covina, CA, February 20-21, 2003.
19
Use of External Containments During Fungal Mitigation”, Invited Speaker, ACGIH
Mold Remediation Symposium, Orlando, FL, November 3-5, 2003.
Building Operator Certification (BOC), 106-IAQ Training Workshops, Northwest Energy
Efficiency Council; Stockton, CA, December 3, 2003; San Francisco, CA, December 9,
2003; Irvine, CA, January 13, 2004; San Diego, January 14, 2004; Irwindale, CA,
January 27, 2004; Downey, CA, January 28, 2004; Santa Monica, CA, March 16, 2004;
Ontario, CA, March 17, 2004; Ontario, CA, November 9, 2004, San Diego, CA,
November 10, 2004; San Francisco, CA, November 17, 2004; San Jose, CA, November
18, 2004; Sacramento, CA, March 15, 2005.
Mold Remediation: The National QUEST for Uniformity Symposium”, Invited
Speaker, Orlando, Florida, November 3-5, 2003.
Mold and Moisture Control”, Indoor Air Quality workshop for The Collaborative for
High Performance Schools (CHPS), San Francisco, December 11, 2003.
Advanced Perspectives In Mold Prevention & Control Symposium”, Invited Speaker,
Las Vegas, Nevada, November 7-9, 2004.
Building Sciences: Understanding and Controlling Moisture in Buildings”, American
Industrial Hygiene Association, San Francisco, CA, February 14-16, 2005.
Indoor Air Quality Diagnostics and Healthy Building Design”, University of California
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, March 2, 2005.
Improving IAQ = Reduced Tenant Complaints”, Northern California Facilities
Exposition, Santa Clara, CA, September 27, 2007.
Defining Safe Building Air”, Criteria for Safe Air and Water in Buildings, ASHRAE
Winter Meeting, Chicago, IL, January 27, 2008.
Update on USGBC LEED and Air Filtration”, Invited Speaker, NAFA 2008
Convention, San Francisco, CA, September 19, 2008.
Ventilation and Indoor air Quality in New California Homes”, National Center of
Healthy Housing, October 20, 2008.
Indoor Air Quality in New Homes”, California Energy and Air Quality Conference,
October 29, 2008.
Mechanical Outdoor air Ventilation Systems and IAQ in New Homes”, ACI Home
Performance Conference, Kansas City, MO, April 29, 2009.
Ventilation and IAQ in New Homes with and without Mechanical Outdoor Air
Systems”, Healthy Buildings 2009, Syracuse, CA, September 14, 2009.
20
Ten Ways to Improve Your Air Quality”, Northern California Facilities Exposition,
Santa Clara, CA, September 30, 2009.
New Developments in Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings”,
Westcon meeting, Alameda, CA, March 17, 2010.
Intermittent Residential Mechanical Outdoor Air Ventilation Systems and IAQ”,
ASHRAE SSPC 62.2 Meeting, Austin, TX, April 19, 2010.
Measured IAQ in Homes”, ACI Home Performance Conference, Austin, TX, April 21,
2010.
Respiration: IEQ and Ventilation”, AIHce 2010, How IH Can LEED in Green buildings,
Denver, CO, May 23, 2010.
IAQ Considerations for Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB)”, Northern California
Facilities Exposition, Santa Clara, CA, September 22, 2010.
Energy Conservation and Health in Buildings”, Berkeley High SchoolGreen Career
Week, Berkeley, CA, April 12, 2011.
What Pollutants are Really There ?”, ACI Home Performance Conference, San
Francisco, CA, March 30, 2011.
Energy Conservation and Health in Residences Workshop”, Indoor Air 2011, Austin,
TX, June 6, 2011.
Assessing IAQ and Improving Health in Residences”, US EPA Weatherization Plus
Health, September 7, 2011.
Ventilation: What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been”, Westcon, May 21, 2014.
Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes: Direct and Indirect Passive Exposures”, Indoor
Air 2014, Hong Kong, July, 2014.
Infectious Disease Aerosol Exposures With and Without Surge Control Ventilation
System Modifications”, Indoor Air 2014, Hong Kong, July, 2014.
Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes”, IMF Health and Welfare Fair, Washington,
DC, February 18, 2015.
Chemical Emissions and Health Hazards Associated with E-Cigarettes”, Roswell Park
Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, August 15, 2014.
Formaldehyde Indoor Concentrations, Material Emission Rates, and the CARB ATCM”,
Harris Martin’s Lumber Liquidators Flooring Litigation Conference, WQ Minneapolis
Hotel, May 27, 2015.
21
Chemical Emissions from E-Cigarettes: Direct and Indirect Passive Exposure”, FDA
Public Workshop: Electronic Cigarettes and the Public Health, Hyattsville, MD June 2,
2015.
Creating Healthy Homes, Schools, and Workplaces”, Chautauqua Institution,
Athenaeum Hotel, August 24, 2015.
Diagnosing IAQ Problems and Designing Healthy Buildings”, University of California
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, October 6, 2015.
Diagnosing Ventilation and IAQ Problems in Commercial Buildings”, BEST Center
Annual Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, January 6, 2016.
A Review of Studies of Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes and Impacts
of Environmental Factors on Formaldehyde Emission Rates From Composite Wood
Products”, AIHce2016, May, 21-26, 2016.
Admissibility of Scientific Testimony”, Science in the Court, Proposition 65
Clearinghouse Annual Conference, Oakland, CA, September 15, 2016.
Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation”, ASHRAE Redwood Empire, Napa, CA, December
1, 2016.
Exhibit B
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
949) 887-9013
mhagemann@swape.com
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
310) 795-2335
prosenfeld@swape.com
January 16, 2020
Michael Lozeau
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
Subject: Comments on the De Anza Hotel Project (SCH No. 2019079010)
Dear Mr. Lozeau,
We have reviewed the July 2019 Public Review Draft Initial Study (“IS”) for the De Anza Hotel Project
Project”) located in the City of Cupertino (“City”). The Project proposes to construct a 129,000 square
foot hotel, an 88,000 square foot subterranean parking garage, and an 18,000 square foot driveway and
surface parking lot on the 1.29-acre site.
Our review concludes that the IS fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s Air Quality, Health Risk, and
Greenhouse Gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and
operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An updated EIR
should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts
that the project may have on the surrounding environment.
Air QualityIncorrectAnalysis of Project Construction Emissions
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“BAAQMD”) provides significance thresholds to evaluate
air pollutant emissions in the form of pounds per day (lbs/day). In order to compare the Project’s air
pollutant emissions to these thresholds, the IS states,
Average daily emissions are based on the annual construction emissions divided by the total
number of active construction days” (p. 4-11).
2
Thus, the IS converted the annual emissions measured in tons per year to pounds per year, and then
divided them by the number of workdays of construction. However, this is incorrect. CalEEMod provides
three types of output files – winter, summer, and annual. While the annual output files measure
emissions in tons per year, both the winter and summer output files provide emissions estimates in
pounds per day. Furthermore, CEQA requires the most conservative analysis, and the use of converted
annual CalEEMod output files may underestimate emissions. Thus, the IS’s conversion from the annual
tons per year to pounds per day was unsubstantiated and incorrect. As such, the IS should have
provided and utilized the emissions from the winter or summer CalEEMod output files in order to
compare to the BAAQMD thresholds. Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions
The IS’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2016.3.2.1 CalEEMod provides
recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological
data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific
project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values,
but the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that such changes be justified by
substantial evidence.2 Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and
operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the
reader what parameters were utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make
known which default values were changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.3
Review of the Project’s air modeling, provided in the Revised Appendix A to the IS, demonstrates that
the IS underestimates emissions associated with Project activities. As previously stated, the IS air quality
analysis relies on air pollutant emissions calculated using CalEEMod. When reviewing the Project’s
CalEEMod output files, provided as Appendix A to the IS, we found that several of the values inputted
into the model were not consistent with information disclosed in the IS. As a result, the Project’s
construction and operational emissions are underestimated. An updated EIR should be prepared to
include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and
operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.
Underestimated Land Use Sizes
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the floor surface area values of the
proposed parking lot and hotel land uses were underestimated within the model, and as a result, the
model may underestimate the Project’s emissions.
1 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
2 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 1, 9.
3 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, fn 1, p. 11, 12 – 13. A key feature
of the CalEEMod program is the “remarks” feature, where the user explains why a default setting was replaced by
a “user defined” value. These remarks are included in the report.
3
According to the IS, the Project proposes to construct an 18,000-square-foot driveway and surface
parking lot (p. 3-25). However, review of the CalEEMod output files reveals that only 860-square-feet of
parking lot were included in the model (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 93, 135).
Furthermore, according to the IS, the Project proposes to construct a 129,000-square-foot hotel building
p. 3-25). However, review of the CalEEMod output files reveals that only 122,256-square-feet of hotel
were included in the model (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 93, 135).
As you can see in the excerpt above, the model underestimated the parking lot land use size by
approximately 17,140-square-feet and the hotel land use size by approximately 6,744-square-feet. As
previously stated, the land use type and size features are used throughout CalEEMod to determine
default variable and emission factors that go into the model’s calculations.4 The square footage of a land
use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., VOC emissions
from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts). By
underestimating the floor surface areas of the proposed parking lot and hotel land uses, the model
underestimates the Project’s construction and operational emissions and should not be relied upon to
determine Project significance.
Unsubstantiated Reduction in Intensity Factors
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the default values for the CO2, CH4, and
N2O intensity factors were manually changed without justification. As a result, the Project’s operational
emissions may be underestimated.
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model’s CO2 intensity factor was
artificially reduced from 641.35 to 10.84, the CH4 intensity factor was reduced from 0.029 to 0, and the
N2O intensity factor was reduced from 0.006 to 0 (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 96, 138).
4 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 18.
4
As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be
justified.5 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification
provided for this change is: “Carbon Intensity factors adjusted for Silicon Valley Clean Energy Power”
Revised Appendix A, pp. 94, 136). Furthermore, the IS states that Silicon Valley Clean Energy will supply
electricity to the Project site (p. 4-30). However, neither the IS nor its associated appendices provide a
citation or further justification for the updated carbon intensity factors. As a result, we cannot verify
these altered values, and the model may underestimate the Project’s emissions.
Failure to Account for Total Amount of Material Export
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the IS’s model failed to include the
total amount of material export expected to occur during Project construction. As a result, the Project’s
construction-related emissions may be underestimated.
According to the IS, “[t]he proposed Project would require up to 72,000 cubic yards of cut” (p. 3-25).
However, review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that only 71,054 cubic yards of
material export were included in the model (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 95, 137).
As you can see in the excerpt above, the model underestimates the amount of material export by 946
cubic yards. This underestimation presents an issue, as the inclusion of the entire amount of material
export within the model is necessary to calculate the emissions produced from material movement,
including truck loading and unloading, and additional hauling truck trips.6 Furthermore, despite the fact
that the IS states that the Project would require up to 72,000 cubic yards of material export, CEQA
requires the most conservative analysis. Thus, the total amount of possible material export should have
been included. As a result, emissions generated during Project construction may be underestimated by
the model.
Unsubstantiated Changes to Pieces of Construction Equipment
The IS’s CalEEMod model includes several unsubstantiated reductions to the numbers of pieces of
construction equipment. As a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction emissions.
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the number of several pieces of
construction equipment were reduced to zero (Revised Appendix A, pp. 95, 138).
5 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9
6 CalEEMod User’s Guide, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/upgrades/2016.3/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-1.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p. 3, 26.
5
As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be
justified.7 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification
provided for these changes is: “No grading soil haul equipment” (Revised Appendix A, pp. 94, 136).
However, this change is not mentioned or justified in the IS and associated appendices. As a result, we
cannot verify these reductions, and the model should not be relied upon to determine Project
significance.
Unsubstantiated Changes to Fleet Mix
The IS’s CalEEMod model includes several unsubstantiated changes to the Project’s fleet mix percentage
values, and as a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s mobile-source operational emissions.
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that several fleet mix percentage values
were manually altered (Revised Appendix A, pp. 95, 137).
As you can see in the excerpt above, the fleet mix for the proposed Project was artificially changed in
the model. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults
be justified.8 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification
provided for these changes is: “Refer to CalEEmod inputs fleet mix” (Revised Appendix A, pp. 94).
However, the IS and associated appendices fail to mention or justify these changes. As a result, the
model may underestimate the Project’s mobile-related operational emissions.
7 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9
8 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9
6
Unsubstantiated Changes to Wastewater Treatment System Percentages
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the wastewater treatment system
percentages were manually altered (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 96, 138, 139).
As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be
justified.9 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification
provided for these changes is: “Refer to CalEEMod inputs” (Revised Appendix A, pp. 94, 136). However,
the IS fails to justify this statement or mention the changes. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide,
each type of wastewater treatment system is associated with different GHG emission factors.10 Thus,
artificially altering the wastewater treatment system percentages may result in an underestimation of
the Project’s GHG emissions. As a result, the model should be relied upon to determine Project
significance.
Incorrect Indoor Water Use Rate
The indoor water use rate, used to estimate the proposed Project’s GHG emissions associated with the
supply and treatment of water, was incorrectly changed from the CalEEMod default value without
sufficient justification.11 As a result, the Project’s operational emissions may be underestimated.
According to the IS, “[t]he estimated water demand is 156 hotel rooms x 390 square foot per room x
0.50 gpd/sf for a total of 30,420 gpd” (p. 4-93). Converted, this correlates with an indoor water use rate
of 11,103,300 gallons per year (gpy).12 However, review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files
demonstrates that only 82,125 gpy were inputted into the model for the hotel land use (see excerpt
below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 138).
9 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 2, 9
10 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 45
11 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 44-45.
12 Indoor Water Use Rate = 30,420 gpd x 365 days per year = 11,103,300 gpy
7
As you can see in the excerpt above, the indoor water use rate was underestimated by approximately
11,021,175 gpy. As previously stated, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires that any non-default values
inputted must be justified.13 However, according to the IS, the indoor water use rate should have been
30,420 gpd, or 11,103,300 gpy (p. 4-93). According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data”
table, these changes are justified by stating: “Refer to CalEEMod inputs” (Revised Appendix A, pp. 136).
However, this fails to substantiate the changes or justify a different indoor water use rate than was
specified in the IS. Thus, the CalEEMod is incorrect and underestimates the hotel land use’s indoor water
use rate.
Furthermore, while the IS provides data on the hotel land use’s indoor water use rate, the IS fails to
provide an indoor water use rate for the Project’s other proposed land uses. However, review of the
Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the indoor water use rate for the Quality Restaurant
land use was artificially altered without justification (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 138).
As you can see in the excerpt above, the indoor water use rate was manually changed for the proposed
Quality Restaurant land use. As previously stated, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires that any non-
default values inputted must be justified.14 However, review of the IS demonstrates that this change was
not mentioned or substantiated. As a result, we cannot verify this change and the model may
underestimate the Project’s water-related operational emissions.
Unsubstantiated Changes to Solid Waste Generation Rates
The solid waste generation rates, used to estimate the proposed Project’s operational greenhouse gas
GHG) emissions associated with the disposal of solid waste into landfills, were artificially changed from
the CalEEMod default values without sufficient justification. 15 As a result, the model may underestimate
the Project’s operational emissions.
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the proposed Project’s solid waste
generation rates were manually changed without adequate justification (see excerpt below) (Revised
Appendix A, pp. 138).
13 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 7, 13.
14 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 7, 13.
15 CalEEMod User’s Guide, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-
guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 46
8
As you can see in the excerpt above, the solid waste generation rates were artificially altered from the
default values. As previously stated, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires that any non-default values
inputted must be justified.16 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the
justification provided for these changes is: “Refer to CalEEMod inputs” (Revised Appendix A, pp. 136).
However, the IS fails to justify or mention these changes. As a result, these changes cannot be verified
and we find the Project’s air quality model to be unreliable for determining Project significance.
Unsubstantiated Application of Construction Mitigation Measure
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model includes an unsubstantiated
construction mitigation measure, and as a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s
construction-related emissions.
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files reveals that the model includes a 9% reduction of
particulate matter emissions as a result of the “Clean Paved Roads” mitigation measure (see excerpt
below) (Revised Appendix A, pp. 94, 134).
As you can see in the excerpt above, the model includes a 9% reduction off particulate matter from the
mitigation measure “Clean Paved Roads.” As previously stated, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires that
any non-default values inputted must be justified.17 While the IS mentions sweeping paved roads, it fails
to justify or mention the 9% reduction (p. 4-11). Furthermore, the “User Entered Comments & Non-
Default Data” table fails to justify the inclusion of this mitigation measure. Thus, the reduction cannot be
verified, and as a result, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction emissions.
Unsubstantiated Application of Water-related Operational Mitigation Measures
Review of the Project’s CalEEMod output files reveals that the model included several water-related
mitigation measures without sufficient justification, and as a result, the Project’s operational emissions
may be underestimated.
16 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 7, 13.
17 CalEEMod User Guide, p. 7, p. 13, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/01_user-
39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4 (A key feature of the CalEEMod program is the “remarks”
feature, where the user explains why a default setting was replaced by a “user defined” value. These remarks are
included in the report.)
9
The Project’s CalEEMod output files demonstrate that the Project’s emissions were modeled with
several unsubstantiated water-related mitigation measures (see excerpt below) (Revised Appendix A,
pp. 129).
As you can see in the excerpt above, the Project’s operational emissions were modeled including the
following water-related mitigation measures: “Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet,” “Install Low Flow
Kitchen Faucet,” “Install Low Flow Toilet,” and “Install Low Flow Shower” (Revised Appendix A, pp. 129).
As previously stated, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires that any non-default values inputted must be
justified.18 However, the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table fails to mention or
provide a justification for the inclusion of these mitigation measures. Additionally, the IS fails to address
these mitigation measures. As a result, we cannot verify the inclusion of these measures in the model,
and the model should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated
The IS conducts a construction health risk assessment (HRA) and determines that, after mitigation, the
construction-related health risk posed to the maximally exposed individual receptor (MEIR) would be
approximately 5.1 in one million (see excerpt below) (p. 4-16, Table 4-5).
However, the IS’s analysis is incorrect, as the construction HRA relies on an unsubstantiated air model
that underestimates the Project’s emissions. As a result, the IS’s construction HRA should not be relied
upon to determine the Project’s significance.
18 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User’s Guide, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 7, 13.
10
Furthermore, review of the IS demonstrates that the IS failed to conduct a quantified HRA for Project
operation, stating:
I]mplementation of the proposed project would not result in creation of land uses that would
generate substantial concentrations of TACs… Development of the proposed hotel may result in
stationary sources of TACs emissions from the restaurant’s use of charbroilers, or emergency
generators and boilers. However, these sources are not considered to be large emitters…
H]otel-related truck deliveries would be less than CARB’s recommended advisory criteria for
distribution centers (100 trucks per day)… [I]mpacts related to TACs are considered less than
significant.” (p. 4-16, 4-17).
However, these justifications and subsequent less than significant impact conclusion are incorrect. By
failing to prepare an operational HRA, the IS is inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the
Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment’s (OEHHA) most recent Risk Assessment
Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, as cited by the IS (Appendix B,
p. 2). The OEHHA guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of a
health risk assessment.19 Once construction of the Project is complete, the Project will operate for a
long period of time. During operation, the Project will generate vehicle trips, which will generate
additional exhaust emissions, thus continuing to expose nearby sensitive receptors to emissions. The
OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months should be
evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be
used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident (MEIR).20 Even
though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that
the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, health risks from Project operation
should have also been evaluated by the IS, as a 30-year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month
requirement set forth by OEHHA. These recommendations reflect the most recent health risk policy, and
as such, an updated assessment of health risks posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project
operation should be included in a revised CEQA evaluation for the Project.
Furthermore, the IS fails to sum the cancer risk calculated for each age group. According to OEHHA
guidance, “the excess cancer risk is calculated separately for each age grouping and then summed to
yield cancer risk at the receptor location.”21 However, review of the construction HRA conducted in the
IS demonstrates that the IS failed to sum each age bin to evaluate the total cancer risk over the course
of the Project’s lifetime. This is incorrect and thus, an updated analysis should quantify the Project’s
19 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf
20 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 8-6, 8-15.
21 “Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 8-4
11
construction and operational health risks and then sum them to compare to the BAAQMD threshold of
10 in one million.22
In an effort to demonstrate the potential risk posed by the Project to nearby sensitive receptors, we
prepared a simple screening-level operational HRA. The results of our assessment, as described below,
demonstrate that construction and operational DPM emissions may result in a potentially significant
health risk impact that was not previously identified or evaluated within the IS. Screening-Level Assessment Indicates Significant Impact
In an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by Project construction and operation to
nearby sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening-level HRA. The results of our assessment, as
described below, provide substantial evidence that the Project’s construction and operational DPM
emissions may result in a potentially significant health risk impact that was not previously identified.
In order to conduct our screening level risk assessment, we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening
level air quality dispersion model. 23 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the
OEHHA 24 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (CAPCOA) 25 guidance as the
appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”). A Level 2 HRSA
utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind
concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an
unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling
approach is required prior to approval of the Project.
We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health-related impacts to
sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the SWAPE annual CalEEMod output
files. According to the IS, there is a residential receptor located approximately 225 feet, or 69 meters,
east of the Project site (p. 4-60, Table 4-7). However, review of Google Earth demonstrates that there
are sensitive receptors roughly 50 meters east of the Project site. Consistent with recommendations set
forth by OEHHA, as cited by the IS, we assumed that residential exposure begins during the third
trimester stage of life. The SWAPE construction CalEEMod output files indicate that construction
activities will generate approximately 127 pounds of DPM over the approximately 592-day construction
period. The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum
downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability
in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission
rate by the following equation:
22 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en
23 “AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,” USEPA, April 11, 2011, available at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf
24 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf
25 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects,” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf
12
126.6 592 453.6 1 24
1 3,600 Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission
rate of 0.001123 grams per second (g/s). Subtracting the 592-day construction duration
from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the MEIR
would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 28.4
years approximately. SWAPE’s updated operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will
generate approximately 81 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used
to estimate the construction DPM rate,
we estimatedthe following emission rate for Projectoperation: 80.
8 365 453.6 1 24 1 3,600
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00116 g/s.
Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 1.29-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of
95 meters by 55 meters. A release height of three meters was selected to
represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an
initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume
dispersion
upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs
for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of
single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized
average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour
concentration by 10%.26 As previously stated, there are residential receptors located
approximately 50 meters from the Project boundary. The single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for
Project construction is approximately 5.141 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 50 meters downwind. Multiplying this
single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.
5141 µg/m3 for Project construction at the nearest sensitive receptor. For Project operation, the single-
hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 5.321 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 25 meters downwind. Multiplying
this single-hour concentration by 10%, we
get an annualized average concentration of 0.5321 µg/m3 for Project operation at the nearest sensitive
receptor. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the residential receptors located closest
to the Project site using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA and the BAAQMD.
Consistent with the construction schedule proposed by the IS’s CalEEMod output files, the annualized average concentration for construction was
used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and the first 1.37 years
of the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was
used for 26 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” EPA, 1992, available at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf;
see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk
13
the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the remainder of the infantile stage of
life (2 – 16 years), child stage of life (2 – 16 years) and adult stage of life (16 – 30 years). Consistent with
the methodology utilized by the IS, we utilized age sensitivity factors (Appendix B, p. 2). Thus, we
multiplied the quantified cancer risk by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and
during the first two years of life (infant) and by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 to 16
years). Furthermore, in accordance with guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th percentile
breathing rates for infants.27 Finally, according to BAAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At
Home (FAH) value of 0.85 for the 3rd trimester and infant receptors, 0.72 for child receptors, and 0.73
for the adult receptors.28 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-1 and an averaging time of
25,550 days. Consistent with OEHHA guidance, exposure to the sensitive receptor was assumed to begin
in the third trimester to provide the most conservative estimate of air quality hazards. The results of our
calculations are shown below.
The Closest Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor
Activity Duration
years)
Concentration
ug/m3)
Breathing
Rate (L/kg-
day)
ASF Cancer Risk
with ASFs*
Construction 0.25 0.5141 361 10 5.9E-06
3rd Trimester
Duration 0.25
3rd
Trimester
Exposure
5.9E-06
Construction 1.37 0.5141 1090 10 9.8E-05
Operation 0.63 0.5321 1090 10 4.7E-05
Infant Exposure
Duration 2.00 Infant
Exposure 1.5E-04
Operation 14.00 0.5321 572 3 1.4E-04
Child Exposure
Duration 14.00 Child
Exposure 1.4E-04
Operation 14.00 0.5321 261 1 2.1E-05
Adult Exposure
Duration 14.00 Adult
Exposure 2.1E-05
Lifetime Exposure
Duration 30.00 Lifetime
Exposure 3.1E-04
27 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and
Assessment Act,” June 5, 2015, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-
assessment/ab2588-risk-assessment-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 19.
Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf
28 “Air Toxics NSR Program Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Guidelines.” BAAQMD, January 2016, available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/rules-and-regs/workshops/2016/reg-2-5/hra-
guidelines_clean_jan_2016-pdf.pdf?la=en
14
As indicated in the table above, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the
third trimester of pregnancy at the closest receptor, located approximately 50 meters away, over the
course of Project construction and operation, are approximately 21, 140, 150, and 5.9 in one million,
respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the closest
receptor is approximately 310 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant health risk impact
not previously addressed or identified by the IS.
An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project’s air emissions with the
health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to
be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. 29 The purpose of the screening-level
construction HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project’s emissions
and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction of the Project
could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-
to-date, applicable guidance are used. Therefore, since our screening-level construction HRA indicates a
potentially significant impact, the City should prepare an EIR with a revised HRA which makes a
reasonable effort to connect the Project’s air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to
nearby receptors. Thus, the City should prepare an updated, quantified air pollution model as well as an
updated, quantified refined health risk assessment which adequately and accurately evaluates health
risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.
Greenhouse GasFailuretoAdequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The IS concludes that the Project’s emissions would exceed the BAAQMD bright line threshold, and
subsequently proposes mitigation. Specifically, the IS states:
Because the project’s net increase in long-term emissions of 1,272 MTCO2e exceeds BAAQMD’s
bright-line threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e per year... the following mitigation measure is proposed”
p. 4-39).
The IS goes on to state:
As a result of implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, emissions from the proposed
project would not exceed the BAAQMD’s bright-line threshold. Therefore, the impact would be
less than significant” (p. 4-39).
Finally, the Project evaluates the Project’s consistency with the CARB Scoping Plan, the Plan Bay Area
2040, and Cupertino’s CAP in order to determine that the Project would have a less than significant
impact (p. 4-40). Thus, the IS relies upon the implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 to reduce
the Project’s GHG impact to a less than significant level, as well as consistency with the above-
mentioned plans.
29 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February
2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 1-5
15
However, this analysis and subsequent less than significant impact conclusion is incorrect for several
reasons.
1) The CARB Scoping Plan and the Plan Bay Area cannot be relied upon to determine Project
significance;
2) The Project fails to demonstrate consistency with the Cupertino CAP;
3) The IS’s incorrect and unsubstantiated analysis indicates a potentially significant GHG impact;
and,
4) Updated analysis indicates significant impact.
1) The CARB Scoping Plan and Plan Bay Area are not CAPs
The IS determines that the Project demonstrates consistency with the CARB Scoping Plan and Plan Bay
Area. However, these policies do not qualify as Climate Action Plans (CAPs). CEQA Guidelines §
15064.4(b)(3) allows a lead agency to consider “[t]he extent to which the project complies with
regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction
or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions (see, e.g., section 15183.5(b)).” (Emph. added). When
adopting this language, the California Natural Resources Agency (“Resources Agency”) explained in its
2018 Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action (“2018 Statement of Reason”)30 that it explicitly
added referenced to section 15183.5(b) because it was “needed to clarify that lead agencies may rely on
plans prepared pursuant to section 15183.5 in evaluating a project’s [GHG] emissions … [and] consistent
with the Agency’s Final Statement of Reasons for the addition of section 15064.4, which states that
proposed section 15064.4 is intended to be read in conjunction with . . . proposed section 15183.5.
Those sections each indicate that local and regional plans may be developed to reduce GHG emissions.’”
2018 Final Statement of Reason, p. 19 (emph. added); see also 2009 Final Statement of Reasons for
Regulatory Action, p. 27.31 When read in conjunction, CEQA Guidelines §§ 15064.4(b)(3) and
15183.5(b)(1) make clear qualified GHG reduction plans (also commonly referred to as a Climate Action
Plan [“CAP”]) should include the following features:
1) Inventory: Quantify GHG emissions, both existing and projected over a specified time period,
resulting from activities (e.g., projects) within a defined geographic area (e.g., lead agency
jurisdiction);
2) Establish GHG Reduction Goal: Establish a level, based on substantial evidence, below which
the contribution to GHG emissions from activities covered by the plan would not be
cumulatively considerable;
3) Analyze Project Types: Identify and analyze the GHG emissions resulting from specific actions
or categories of actions anticipated within the geographic area;
30 Resources Agency (Nov. 2018) Final Statement of Reasons For Regulatory Action: Amendments To The State
CEQA Guidelines, http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/2018_CEQA_Final_Statement_of%20Reasons_111218.pdf.
31 Resources Agency (Dec. 2009) Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, p. 27 (“Those sections each
indicate that local and regional plans may be developed to reduce GHG emissions. If such plans reduce
community-wide emissions to a level that is less than significant, a later project that complies with the
requirements in such a plan may be found to have a less than significant impact.”), http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/
docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf.
16
4) Craft Performance Based Mitigation Measures: Specify measures or a group of measures,
including performance standards, that substantial evidence demonstrates, if implemented on a
project-by-project basis, would collectively achieve the specified emissions level;
5) Monitoring: Establish a mechanism to monitor the CAP progress toward achieving said level
and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving specified levels;
The above-listed CAP features provide the necessary substantial evidence demonstrating a project’s
incremental contribution is not cumulative considerable, as required under CEQA Guidelines §
15064.4(b)(3).32 Here, however, the IS fails to demonstrate that the plans and policies include the
above-listed requirements to be considered a qualified CAP for the City. As such, the IS leaves an
analytical gap showing that compliance with said plans can be used for a project-level significance
determination. Thus, the IS’s GHG analysis regarding the CARB Scoping Plan and Plan Bay Area should
not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
2) The Cupertino CAP Cannot be Relied upon to Determine Project Significance;
As discussed above, the IS relies on the Project’s consistency with the Cupertino CAP to determine that
the Project’s GHG impact would be less than significant. Specifically, the IS states,
Development in the Cupertino, including the proposed project, is required to adhere to City-
adopted policy provisions, including those contained in the adopted CAP. The City ensures that
the provisions of the Cupertino CAP are incorporated into projects and their permits through
development review and applications of conditions of approval as applicable. Therefore, the
impact would be less than significant” (p. 4-43).
However, the CAP fails to provide specific, project-level measures. Instead, the CAP provides
community-wide” measures with quantified GHG reduction potentials. Regardless, the IS fails to
demonstrate consistency with all of the CAP’s “community-wide” measures and associated GHG
reduction potentials (see table below).
32 See Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160, 200-201
Upheld qualitative GHG analysis when based on city’s adopted its greenhouse gas strategy that contained
multiple elements” of CEQA Guidelines § 15183.5(b), “quantification of [city’s] baseline levels of [GHG] emissions
and planned reductions[,]” approved by the regional air district, and “[a]t the heart” of the city’s greenhouse gas
strategy was “specific regulations” and measures to be implemented on a “project-by-project basis … designed to
achieve the specified citywide emission level.”).
17
Measure IS Consistency
Cupertino CAP
Community-Wide Measures
Measure C-E-1 Energy Use Data and Analysis
Increase resident and building
owner/tenant/operator knowledge about how,
when, and where building energy is used.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 850 MT CO2e/yr
Here, the IS fails to address
owner/tenant/operator knowledge about how,
when, and where building energy is used. The IS
also fails to address any quantified GHG
reductions or potential for future reductions.
Measure C-E-2 Retrofit Financing
Promote existing and support development of
new private financing options for home and
commercial building retrofits and renewable
energy development.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 10,525 MT
CO2e/yr
Here, the IS fails to address new or existing
private financing options for home and
commercial building retrofits and renewable
energy development. The IS also fails to address
any quantified GHG reductions or potential for
future reductions.
Measure C-E-3 Home & Commercial Building
Retrofit Outreach
Develop aggressive outreach program to drive
voluntary participation in energy- and water-
efficiency retrofits.
Supporting Measure
Here, the IS fails to address outreach programs to
drive voluntary participation in energy- and
water-efficiency retrofits.
Measure C-E-4 Energy Assurance & Resiliency
Plan
Develop a long-term community-wide energy
conservation plan that considers future
opportunities to influence building energy
efficiency through additional or enhanced
building regulations.
Supporting Measure
Here, the IS fails to address a long-term
community-wide energy conservation plan. The IS
also fails to mention future opportunities to
influence building energy efficiency through
additional or enhanced building regulations.
18
Measure C-E-5 Community-Wide Solar
Photovoltaic Development
Encourage voluntary community-wide solar
photovoltaic development through regulatory
barrier reduction and public outreach campaigns.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 4,400 MT CO2e/yr
Here, while the IS mentions the potential for
solar panels on the roof level, it fails to quantify
these emissions or mention voluntary
community-wide photovoltaic development
through regulatory barrier reduction and public
outreach campaigns (p. 3-13). The IS also fails to
address any quantified GHG reductions or
potential for future reductions.
Measure C-E-6 Community-Wide Solar Hot
Water Development
Encourage communitywide solar hot water
development through regulatory barrier reduction
and public outreach campaigns.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 925 MT CO2e/yr
Here, the IS fails to mention solar hot water
development through regulatory barrier
reduction and public outreach campaigns. The IS
also fails to address any quantified GHG
reductions or potential for future reductions.
Measure C-E-7 Community Choice Energy
Option
Partner with other Santa Clara County
jurisdictions to evaluate the development of a
regional CCE option, including identification of the
geographic scope, potential costs to participating
jurisdictions and residents, and potential
liabilities.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 56,875 MT
CO2e/yr
Here, the IS fails to mention partnering with
other Santa Clara County jurisdictions or
evaluating the development of a regional CCE
option. The IS also fails to address the
identification of the geographic scope, potential
costs to participating jurisdictions and
residentials, or potential liabilities. The IS also
fails to address any quantified GHG reductions or
potential for future reductions.
Measure C-T-2 Bikeshare Program
Explore feasibility of developing local bikeshare
program.
Supporting Measure
Here, while the IS discusses bicycle facilities in the
vicinity of the proposed Project and mentions
that the Project would not conflict with the City’s
Bike Plan, the IS fails to address a bikeshare
program (p. 4-83).
19
Measure C-T-3 Transportation Demand
Management
Provide informational resources to local
businesses subject to SB 1339 transportation
demand management program requirements and
encourage additional voluntary participation in
the program.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 2,375 MT CO2e/yr
Here, while the IS addresses a TDM program, the
IS fails to mention SB 1339, informational
resources, or encouraging additional voluntary
participation in the program (p. 3-22). The IS also
fails to address any quantified GHG reductions or
potential for future reductions.
Measure C-T-5 Transit Priority
Improve transit service reliability and speed.
Supporting Measure
Here, while the IS mentions local transit, it fails to
discuss any improvements of transit service
reliability and speed (p. 4-77).
Measure C-T-6 Transit-Oriented Development
Continue to encourage development that takes
advantage of its location near local transit
options (e.g., major bus stops) through higher
densities and intensities to increase ridership
potential.
Supporting Measure
Here, while the IS mentions transit, it fails to
discuss encouraging development that takes
advantage of its location near local transit
options (p. 4-77). The IS also fails to address
encouraging higher densities and intensities to
increase ridership potential.
Measure C-T-7 Community-Wide Alternative
Fuel Vehicles
Encourage community-wide use of alternative
fuel vehicles through expansion of alternative
vehicle refueling infrastructure.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 10,225 MT
CO2e/yr
Here, the IS fails to mention encouraging
community-wide use of alternative fuel vehicles
or alternative fuel refueling infrastructure. The IS
also fails to address any quantified GHG
reductions or potential for future reductions.
20
Measure C-SW-2 Food Scrap and Compostable
Paper Diversion
Continue to promote the collection of food scraps
and compostable paper through the City’s
organics collection program.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 750 MT CO2e/yr
Here, while the IS mentions the existing
composting program, it fails to specifically
address food scraps or compostable paper (p. 3-
24). The IS also fails to mention the City’s
organics collection program. Finally, the IS also
fails to address any quantified GHG reductions or
potential for future reductions.
Measure C-SW-3 Construction & Demolition
Waste Diversion Program
Continue to enforce diversion requirements in
City’s Construction & Demolition Debris Diversion
and Green Building Ordinances.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 550 MT CO2e/yr
Here, the IS states: “[T]he City’s Zero Waste
Policy also requires that all private construction
projects that come through the City’s permitting
process, and all City projects (through contract
requirements), to recover and divert at least 65
percent of the construction waste generated by
the project. Compliance with applicable statutes
and regulations would ensure that the impact
would be less than significant, and no mitigation
measures would be required” (p. 4-97, 4-98).
However, the IS fails to address any quantified
GHG reductions. Furthermore, the IS failed to
address how the City’s policy would be enforced
by the Project.
Measure C-G-1 Urban Forest Program
Support development and maintenance of a
healthy, vibrant urban forest through outreach,
incentives, and strategic leadership.
2035 GHG Reduction Potential: 725 MT CO2e/yr
Here, the IS states: “The City recognizes
that every tree on both public and private
property is an important part of Cupertino's
urban forest and contributes significant
economic, environmental and aesthetic benefits
of the community. All 11 existing trees will
remain on the project site as part of the proposed
project. The existing tree species are not native to
California, nor indigenous to the project site” (p.
4-21). However, the IS fails to address any
quantified GHG reductions resulting from this
measure. Furthermore, simply maintaining the
existing trees on the site does not constitute
supporting the development and maintenance of
a healthy, vibrant urban forest. Finally, there is no
mention of the use of outreach, incentives, or
strategic leadership to achieve this measure.
3) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Analysis Demonstrates Significant GHG Impact
As discussed above, the IS reports that the Project would result in annual GHG emissions of 1,272 MT
CO2e/year (MT CO2e/yr) and concluded that, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1,
21
emissions from the Project would not exceed the BAAQMD bright-line threshold of 1,000 MT CO2e/year
p. 4-39). However, this conclusion is incorrect for two reasons.
First, the IS’s GHG analysis relies on an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model, as discussed above. This
is incorrect, as the model underestimates the Project’s GHG emissions.
Second, the IS cannot assume that the implementation of one mitigation measure would reduce the
Project’s GHG emissions to a less than significant level without quantifying impacts. Without any sort of
quantified analysis of the mitigation measure and its associated reductions, the IS cannot claim a less
than significant impact simply based on one mitigation measure. Until the City adequately quantifies the
Project’s GHG emissions, including the implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, and demonstrates
that the Project’s GHG emissions would not exceed relevant BAAQMD thresholds, there is not
substantial evidence that the Project’s GHG impact would be less than significant.
4) Updated Analysis Indicates Significant Impact
Applicable thresholds and site-specific modeling demonstrate that the Project may result in a potentially
significant GHG impact. The updated CalEEMod output files, modeled by SWAPE with Project-specific
information, disclose the Project’s mitigated emissions, which include approximately 1,046 MT CO2e of
total construction emissions (sum of emissions from 2020, 2021, and 2022) and approximately 2,248 MT
CO2e/year of annual operational emissions (sum of area, energy, mobile, stationary, waste, and water-
related emissions from both on-site and off-site operations). When we compare the total Project’s GHG
emissions, including construction emissions amortized over 30 years and operational emissions, to the
BAAQMD bright-line threshold of 1,100 MT CO2e/year,33 we find that the Project’s GHG emissions
exceed the threshold (see table below).
SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase
Proposed
Project (MT
CO2e/year)
Construction (amortized over 30 years) 34.85
Area 0.01
Energy 974.49
Mobile 1,183.11
Waste 47.71
Water 42.52
Total 2,282.69
Threshold 1,100
Exceed? Yes
33 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p.
2-4.
22
As demonstrated in the table above, the proposed Project would generate a total of approximately
2,283 MT CO2e/year when modeled correctly, which exceeds the BAAQMD’s 1,100 MT CO2e/year
threshold. Hence, a Tier 4 analysis is warranted. According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report,
service population is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported
by the project.”34 Review of the IS demonstratres that the Project would result in no new residents and
78 new jobs (p. 1-4). Thus, the Project is estimated to have a service population of 78. When dividing the
Project’s GHG emissions by a service population value of 78 people, we find that the Project would emit
approximately 29.3 MT CO2e/SP/year.35 This exceeds the BAAQMD 2030 substantial progress threshold
of 2.6 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).
SWAPE Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase Proposed Project
MT CO2e/year)
Annual Emissions 2,282.69
Service Population 78
Service Population Efficiency 29.3
Threshold 2.6
Exceed? Yes
As the table above demonstrates, when correct input parameters are used to model Project emissions,
the Project’s total GHG emissions exceed the “Substantial Progress” efficiency threshold for 2030 of 2.6
MT CO2e/SP/year, thus resulting in a significant impact not previously assessed or identified in the IS. As
a result, an updated GHG analysis should be prepared in a Project-specific EIR and additional mitigation
should be incorporated into the Project.
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become
available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional
information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of
care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants
practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing
results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was
reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or
otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by
third parties.
34 CAPCOA (Jan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, p. 71-72, http://www.capcoa.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf.
35 Calculated: (2,283 MT CO2e/year) / (78 service population) = (29.3 MT CO2e/SP/year).
23
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 95.92 1000sqft 0.01 95,923.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 12.86 1000sqft 0.30 0.00 0
Parking Lot 18.00 1000sqft 0.41 18,000.00 0
Hotel 156.00 Room 0.42 129,000.00 0
Quality Restaurant 10.36 1000sqft 0.24 10,358.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 58
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2022OperationalYear
CO2 Intensity
lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4Intensity
lb/MWhr)
0.006N2OIntensity
lb/MWhr)
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation
Santa Clara County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage1of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about intensity factors.
Land Use - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about parking lot and hotel land use sizes.
Construction Phase - Consistent with IS's model.
Off-road Equipment - No change. See SWAPE comment about equipment unit amounts.
Trips and VMT - Consistent with IS's model.
Demolition -
Grading - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about grading.
Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS's model.
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See SWAPE comment about water use rates and wastewater treatment system percentages.
Solid Waste - See SWAPE comment about solid waste generation rates.
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment about construction mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage2of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 350.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 72,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 95,920.00 95,923.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 12,860.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 226,512.00 129,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,360.00 10,358.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.20 0.01
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.20 0.42
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 64.00 79.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 38.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 4.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 58.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.64
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage3of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 10.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,957,216.12 11,103,300.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage4of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.1759 2.5658 1.1145 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0591 0.3359 0.1153 0.0558 0.1711 0.0000 518.5810 518.5810 0.0449 0.0000 519.7039
2021 0.2970 2.3722 2.1497 5.3600e-
003
0.1458 0.0913 0.2370 0.0396 0.0881 0.1277 0.0000 469.7131 469.7131 0.0506 0.0000 470.9768
2022 0.7833 0.2583 0.2684 6.3000e-
004
0.0161 0.0101 0.0262 4.3700e-
003
9.7000e-
003
0.0141 0.0000 54.7272 54.7272 6.7700e-
003
0.0000 54.8964
Maximum 0.7833 2.5658 2.1497 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0913 0.3359 0.1153 0.0881 0.1711 0.0000 518.5810 518.5810 0.0506 0.0000 519.7039
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.1759 2.5658 1.1145 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0278 0.3046 0.1153 0.0266 0.1418 0.0000 518.5809 518.5809 0.0449 0.0000 519.7038
2021 0.2970 2.3722 2.1497 5.3600e-
003
0.1458 0.0633 0.2091 0.0396 0.0609 0.1005 0.0000 469.7128 469.7128 0.0506 0.0000 470.9765
2022 0.7833 0.2583 0.2684 6.3000e-
004
0.0161 6.3900e-
003
0.0225 4.3700e-
003
6.1600e-
003
0.0105 0.0000 54.7272 54.7272 6.7700e-
003
0.0000 54.8963
Maximum 0.7833 2.5658 2.1497 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0633 0.3046 0.1153 0.0609 0.1418 0.0000 518.5809 518.5809 0.0506 0.0000 519.7038
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage5of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.22 10.50 0.00 39.02 19.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 8-3-2020 11-2-2020 3.6039 3.6039
2 11-3-2020 2-2-2021 0.7145 0.7145
3 2-3-2021 5-2-2021 0.6506 0.6506
4 5-3-2021 8-2-2021 0.6701 0.6701
5 8-3-2021 11-2-2021 0.6715 0.6715
6 11-3-2021 2-2-2022 0.6551 0.6551
7 2-3-2022 5-2-2022 0.7591 0.7591
Highest 3.6039 3.6039
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage6of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Energy 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 969.8418 969.8418 0.0329 0.0128 974.4919
Mobile 0.4132 1.8226 5.1890 0.0186 1.7360 0.0156 1.7516 0.4647 0.0146 0.4793 0.0000 1,702.092
8
1,702.092
8
0.0554 0.0000 1,703.478
1
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.2557 0.0000 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.5202 23.0800 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5641
Total 1.0826 2.2084 5.5157 0.0209 1.7360 0.0449 1.7809 0.4647 0.0439 0.5086 23.7759 2,695.019
8
2,718.795
7
1.6916 0.0240 2,768.245
0
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage7of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Energy 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 969.8418 969.8418 0.0329 0.0128 974.4919
Mobile 0.4132 1.8226 5.1890 0.0186 1.7360 0.0156 1.7516 0.4647 0.0146 0.4793 0.0000 1,702.092
8
1,702.092
8
0.0554 0.0000 1,703.478
1
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.2557 0.0000 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.5202 23.0800 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5641
Total 1.0826 2.2084 5.5157 0.0209 1.7360 0.0449 1.7809 0.4647 0.0439 0.5086 23.7759 2,695.019
8
2,718.795
7
1.6916 0.0240 2,768.245
0
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage8of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/3/2020 8/14/2020 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/17/2020 8/21/2020 5 5
3 Grading Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
4 Grading Soil Haul Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/5/2020 2/4/2022 5 350
6 Paving Paving 2/7/2022 2/18/2022 5 10
7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/21/2022 3/18/2022 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 209,037; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,679; Striped Parking Area: 6,835
Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 2.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage9of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Grading Soil Haul Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Soil Haul Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Soil Haul Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage10of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.8900e-
003
0.0000 6.8900e-
003
1.0400e-
003
0.0000 1.0400e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
5.7600e-
003
5.7600e-
003
5.3800e-
003
5.3800e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Total 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
6.8900e-
003
5.7600e-
003
0.0127 1.0400e-
003
5.3800e-
003
6.4200e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use DPF for Construction Equipment
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 4.00 79.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 7 106.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading Soil Haul 3 8.00 0.00 9,000.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage11of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.3000e-
004
0.0115 2.3500e-
003
3.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 3.0127 3.0127 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 3.0161
Vendor 8.0000e-
005
2.2800e-
003
6.1000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.4000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5229 0.5229 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5235
Worker 2.2000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
1.6300e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4421 0.4421 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4424
Total 6.3000e-
004
0.0139 4.5900e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3200e-
003
5.0000e-
005
1.3700e-
003
3.6000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.9777 3.9777 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 3.9820
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.8900e-
003
0.0000 6.8900e-
003
1.0400e-
003
0.0000 1.0400e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
1.7100e-
003
1.7100e-
003
1.6500e-
003
1.6500e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Total 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
6.8900e-
003
1.7100e-
003
8.6000e-
003
1.0400e-
003
1.6500e-
003
2.6900e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage12of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.3000e-
004
0.0115 2.3500e-
003
3.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 3.0127 3.0127 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 3.0161
Vendor 8.0000e-
005
2.2800e-
003
6.1000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.4000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5229 0.5229 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5235
Worker 2.2000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
1.6300e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4421 0.4421 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4424
Total 6.3000e-
004
0.0139 4.5900e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3200e-
003
5.0000e-
005
1.3700e-
003
3.6000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.9777 3.9777 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 3.9820
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0145 0.0000 0.0145 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
2.0500e-
003
2.0500e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Total 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
0.0145 2.0500e-
003
0.0166 7.3800e-
003
1.8900e-
003
9.2700e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage13of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 4.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
3.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2614 0.2614 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2617
Worker 7.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1360 0.1360 0.0000 0.0000 0.1361
Total 1.1000e-
004
1.1900e-
003
8.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.3000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
6.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3975 0.3975 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3979
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0145 0.0000 0.0145 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Total 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
0.0145 3.1000e-
004
0.0148 7.3800e-
003
2.8000e-
004
7.6600e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage14of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 4.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
3.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2614 0.2614 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2617
Worker 7.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1360 0.1360 0.0000 0.0000 0.1361
Total 1.1000e-
004
1.1900e-
003
8.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.3000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
6.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3975 0.3975 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3979
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0678 0.0000 0.0678 0.0372 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0103 0.0103 9.4400e-
003
9.4400e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0678 0.0103 0.0780 0.0372 9.4400e-
003
0.0467 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage15of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4000e-
004
6.8300e-
003
1.8200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
4.3000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
1.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.5687 1.5687 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.5705
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 6.4000e-
004
7.1200e-
003
4.8200e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.3848 2.3848 9.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.3871
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0678 0.0000 0.0678 0.0372 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
1.5400e-
003
1.5400e-
003
1.4200e-
003
1.4200e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0678 1.5400e-
003
0.0693 0.0372 1.4200e-
003
0.0387 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage16of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4000e-
004
6.8300e-
003
1.8200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
4.3000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
1.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.5687 1.5687 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.5705
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 6.4000e-
004
7.1200e-
003
4.8200e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.3848 2.3848 9.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.3871
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0718 0.0000 0.0718 0.0379 0.0000 0.0379 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0103 0.0103 9.4400e-
003
9.4400e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0718 0.0103 0.0821 0.0379 9.4400e-
003
0.0473 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage17of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0374 1.3058 0.2674 3.5500e-
003
0.0763 4.2400e-
003
0.0805 0.0210 4.0600e-
003
0.0250 0.0000 343.2186 343.2186 0.0157 0.0000 343.6111
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 0.0378 1.3061 0.2704 3.5600e-
003
0.0772 4.2500e-
003
0.0815 0.0212 4.0700e-
003
0.0253 0.0000 344.0348 344.0348 0.0157 0.0000 344.4278
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0718 0.0000 0.0718 0.0379 0.0000 0.0379 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
1.5400e-
003
1.5400e-
003
1.4200e-
003
1.4200e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0718 1.5400e-
003
0.0734 0.0379 1.4200e-
003
0.0393 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage18of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0374 1.3058 0.2674 3.5500e-
003
0.0763 4.2400e-
003
0.0805 0.0210 4.0600e-
003
0.0250 0.0000 343.2186 343.2186 0.0157 0.0000 343.6111
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 0.0378 1.3061 0.2704 3.5600e-
003
0.0772 4.2500e-
003
0.0815 0.0212 4.0700e-
003
0.0253 0.0000 344.0348 344.0348 0.0157 0.0000 344.4278
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0255 0.0255 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 58.0935 58.0935 0.0108 0.0000 58.3631
Total 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0255 0.0255 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 58.0935 58.0935 0.0108 0.0000 58.3631
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage19of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 5.3300e-
003
0.1530 0.0408 3.7000e-
004
8.8400e-
003
7.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
003
2.5600e-
003
7.3000e-
004
3.2800e-
003
0.0000 35.1379 35.1379 1.6100e-
003
0.0000 35.1782
Worker 0.0113 8.1000e-
003
0.0849 2.6000e-
004
0.0269 1.7000e-
004
0.0271 7.1500e-
003
1.6000e-
004
7.3100e-
003
0.0000 23.0707 23.0707 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 23.0848
Total 0.0166 0.1611 0.1257 6.3000e-
004
0.0357 9.3000e-
004
0.0367 9.7100e-
003
8.9000e-
004
0.0106 0.0000 58.2086 58.2086 2.1800e-
003
0.0000 58.2630
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0174 0.0174 0.0168 0.0168 0.0000 58.0934 58.0934 0.0108 0.0000 58.3630
Total 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0174 0.0174 0.0168 0.0168 0.0000 58.0934 58.0934 0.0108 0.0000 58.3630
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage20of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 5.3300e-
003
0.1530 0.0408 3.7000e-
004
8.8400e-
003
7.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
003
2.5600e-
003
7.3000e-
004
3.2800e-
003
0.0000 35.1379 35.1379 1.6100e-
003
0.0000 35.1782
Worker 0.0113 8.1000e-
003
0.0849 2.6000e-
004
0.0269 1.7000e-
004
0.0271 7.1500e-
003
1.6000e-
004
7.3100e-
003
0.0000 23.0707 23.0707 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 23.0848
Total 0.0166 0.1611 0.1257 6.3000e-
004
0.0357 9.3000e-
004
0.0367 9.7100e-
003
8.9000e-
004
0.0106 0.0000 58.2086 58.2086 2.1800e-
003
0.0000 58.2630
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0893 0.0893 0.0862 0.0862 0.0000 236.9197 236.9197 0.0423 0.0000 237.9771
Total 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0893 0.0893 0.0862 0.0862 0.0000 236.9197 236.9197 0.0423 0.0000 237.9771
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage21of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0179 0.5632 0.1499 1.4800e-
003
0.0361 1.2500e-
003
0.0373 0.0104 1.1900e-
003
0.0116 0.0000 141.9740 141.9740 6.1900e-
003
0.0000 142.1287
Worker 0.0426 0.0295 0.3164 1.0000e-
003
0.1097 6.9000e-
004
0.1104 0.0292 6.4000e-
004
0.0298 0.0000 90.8194 90.8194 2.0700e-
003
0.0000 90.8711
Total 0.0605 0.5927 0.4664 2.4800e-
003
0.1458 1.9400e-
003
0.1477 0.0396 1.8300e-
003
0.0414 0.0000 232.7934 232.7934 8.2600e-
003
0.0000 232.9998
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0614 0.0614 0.0591 0.0591 0.0000 236.9194 236.9194 0.0423 0.0000 237.9768
Total 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0614 0.0614 0.0591 0.0591 0.0000 236.9194 236.9194 0.0423 0.0000 237.9768
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage22of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0179 0.5632 0.1499 1.4800e-
003
0.0361 1.2500e-
003
0.0373 0.0104 1.1900e-
003
0.0116 0.0000 141.9740 141.9740 6.1900e-
003
0.0000 142.1287
Worker 0.0426 0.0295 0.3164 1.0000e-
003
0.1097 6.9000e-
004
0.1104 0.0292 6.4000e-
004
0.0298 0.0000 90.8194 90.8194 2.0700e-
003
0.0000 90.8711
Total 0.0605 0.5927 0.4664 2.4800e-
003
0.1458 1.9400e-
003
0.1477 0.0396 1.8300e-
003
0.0414 0.0000 232.7934 232.7934 8.2600e-
003
0.0000 232.9998
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
7.3600e-
003
7.3600e-
003
7.1100e-
003
7.1100e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Total 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
7.3600e-
003
7.3600e-
003
7.1100e-
003
7.1100e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage23of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.6000e-
003
0.0510 0.0135 1.4000e-
004
3.4500e-
003
1.0000e-
004
3.5600e-
003
1.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
004
1.1000e-
003
0.0000 13.4689 13.4689 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 13.4831
Worker 3.8100e-
003
2.5400e-
003
0.0279 9.0000e-
005
0.0105 6.0000e-
005
0.0106 2.7900e-
003
6.0000e-
005
2.8500e-
003
0.0000 8.3832 8.3832 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 8.3876
Total 5.4100e-
003
0.0535 0.0414 2.3000e-
004
0.0140 1.6000e-
004
0.0141 3.7900e-
003
1.6000e-
004
3.9500e-
003
0.0000 21.8521 21.8521 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 21.8707
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
5.0800e-
003
5.0800e-
003
4.8900e-
003
4.8900e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Total 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
5.0800e-
003
5.0800e-
003
4.8900e-
003
4.8900e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage24of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.6000e-
003
0.0510 0.0135 1.4000e-
004
3.4500e-
003
1.0000e-
004
3.5600e-
003
1.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
004
1.1000e-
003
0.0000 13.4689 13.4689 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 13.4831
Worker 3.8100e-
003
2.5400e-
003
0.0279 9.0000e-
005
0.0105 6.0000e-
005
0.0106 2.7900e-
003
6.0000e-
005
2.8500e-
003
0.0000 8.3832 8.3832 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 8.3876
Total 5.4100e-
003
0.0535 0.0414 2.3000e-
004
0.0140 1.6000e-
004
0.0141 3.7900e-
003
1.6000e-
004
3.9500e-
003
0.0000 21.8521 21.8521 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 21.8707
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4400e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
1.7400e-
003
1.7400e-
003
1.6000e-
003
1.6000e-
003
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9315
Paving 5.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.9800e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
1.7400e-
003
1.7400e-
003
1.6000e-
003
1.6000e-
003
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9315
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage25of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Total 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4400e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9314
Paving 5.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.9800e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9314
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage26of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Total 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.7504 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.0500e-
003
0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Total 0.7525 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage27of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Total 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.7504 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.0500e-
003
0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Total 0.7525 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage28of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Total 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage29of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4132 1.8226 5.1890 0.0186 1.7360 0.0156 1.7516 0.4647 0.0146 0.4793 0.0000 1,702.092
8
1,702.092
8
0.0554 0.0000 1,703.478
1
Unmitigated 0.4132 1.8226 5.1890 0.0186 1.7360 0.0156 1.7516 0.4647 0.0146 0.4793 0.0000 1,702.092
8
1,702.092
8
0.0554 0.0000 1,703.478
1
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,659.84 1,659.84 1659.84 4,668,392 4,668,392
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,659.84 1,659.84 1,659.84 4,668,392 4,668,392
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 100 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage30of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 549.9107 549.9107 0.0249 5.1400e-
003
552.0654
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 549.9107 549.9107 0.0249 5.1400e-
003
552.0654
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Hotel 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Parking Lot 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Quality Restaurant 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage31of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 5.71599e
006
0.0308 0.2802 0.2354 1.6800e-
003
0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0000 305.0270 305.0270 5.8500e-
003
5.5900e-
003
306.8396
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
2.15322e
006
0.0116 0.1056 0.0887 6.3000e-
004
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
0.0000 114.9041 114.9041 2.2000e-
003
2.1100e-
003
115.5869
Total 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage32of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 5.71599e
006
0.0308 0.2802 0.2354 1.6800e-
003
0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0000 305.0270 305.0270 5.8500e-
003
5.5900e-
003
306.8396
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
2.15322e
006
0.0116 0.1056 0.0887 6.3000e-
004
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
0.0000 114.9041 114.9041 2.2000e-
003
2.1100e-
003
115.5869
Total 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage33of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
562109 163.5239 7.3900e-
003
1.5300e-
003
164.1646
Hotel 982980 285.9602 0.0129 2.6800e-
003
287.0806
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6300 1.8327 8.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.8399
Quality
Restaurant
338914 98.5939 4.4600e-
003
9.2000e-
004
98.9802
Total 549.9107 0.0249 5.1500e-
003
552.0654
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage34of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
562109 163.5239 7.3900e-
003
1.5300e-
003
164.1646
Hotel 982980 285.9602 0.0129 2.6800e-
003
287.0806
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6300 1.8327 8.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.8399
Quality
Restaurant
338914 98.5939 4.4600e-
003
9.2000e-
004
98.9802
Total 549.9107 0.0249 5.1500e-
003
552.0654
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage35of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Unmitigated 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.5516 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Total 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage36of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.5516 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Total 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage37of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5641
Unmitigated 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5641
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 11.1033 /
0.439691
21.4482 0.3626 8.7100e-
003
33.1093
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
3.14461 /
0.20072
6.1520 0.1027 2.4700e-
003
9.4549
Total 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5642
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage38of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 11.1033 /
0.439691
21.4482 0.3626 8.7100e-
003
33.1093
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
3.14461 /
0.20072
6.1520 0.1027 2.4700e-
003
9.4549
Total 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5642
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage39of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Unmitigated 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Category/Year
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 85.41 17.3375 1.0246 0.0000 42.9528
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
9.45 1.9183 0.1134 0.0000 4.7524
Total 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage40of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 85.41 17.3375 1.0246 0.0000 42.9528
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
9.45 1.9183 0.1134 0.0000 4.7524
Total 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage41of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
11.0 Vegetation
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:06PMPage42of42
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Annual
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 95.92 1000sqft 0.01 95,923.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 12.86 1000sqft 0.30 0.00 0
Parking Lot 18.00 1000sqft 0.41 18,000.00 0
Hotel 156.00 Room 0.42 129,000.00 0
Quality Restaurant 10.36 1000sqft 0.24 10,358.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 58
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2022OperationalYear
CO2 Intensity
lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4Intensity
lb/MWhr)
0.006N2OIntensity
lb/MWhr)
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation
Santa Clara County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage1of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about intensity factors.
Land Use - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about parking lot and hotel land use sizes.
Construction Phase - Consistent with IS's model.
Off-road Equipment - No change. See SWAPE comment about equipment unit amounts.
Trips and VMT - Consistent with IS's model.
Demolition -
Grading - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about grading.
Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS's model.
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See SWAPE comment about water use rates and wastewater treatment system percentages.
Solid Waste - See SWAPE comment about solid waste generation rates.
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment about construction mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage2of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 350.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 72,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 95,920.00 95,923.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 12,860.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 226,512.00 129,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,360.00 10,358.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.20 0.01
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.20 0.42
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 64.00 79.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 38.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 4.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 58.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.64
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage3of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 10.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,957,216.12 11,103,300.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage4of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.3075 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 1.6574 16.3634 6.4861 1.5353 8.0214 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
2021 2.3181 18.1908 16.5975 0.0408 1.1551 0.6994 1.8545 0.3128 0.6750 0.9878 0.0000 3,940.210
2
3,940.210
2
0.4291 0.0000 3,950.937
8
2022 75.3144 16.7953 16.1502 0.0404 1.1551 0.6025 1.7577 0.3128 0.5817 0.8946 0.0000 3,901.599
8
3,901.599
8
0.4162 0.0000 3,912.003
6
Maximum 75.3144 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 1.6574 16.3634 6.4861 1.5353 8.0214 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.3075 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 0.5736 15.1999 6.4861 0.5518 6.9510 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
2021 2.3181 18.1908 16.5975 0.0408 1.1551 0.4855 1.6407 0.3128 0.4669 0.7797 0.0000 3,940.210
2
3,940.210
2
0.4291 0.0000 3,950.937
8
2022 75.3144 16.7953 16.1502 0.0404 1.1551 0.4202 1.5754 0.3128 0.4040 0.7168 0.0000 3,901.599
8
3,901.599
8
0.4162 0.0000 3,912.003
6
Maximum 75.3144 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 0.5736 15.1999 6.4861 0.5518 6.9510 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage5of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.01 7.81 0.00 49.05 14.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage6of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 2.2571 10.2404 29.4968 0.1010 9.8751 0.0862 9.9613 2.6359 0.0805 2.7164 10,194.29
14
10,194.29
14
0.3421 10,202.84
36
Total 5.9262 12.3543 31.3022 0.1137 9.8751 0.2469 10.1220 2.6359 0.2413 2.8772 12,730.76
52
12,730.76
52
0.3909 0.0465 12,754.39
43
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 2.2571 10.2404 29.4968 0.1010 9.8751 0.0862 9.9613 2.6359 0.0805 2.7164 10,194.29
14
10,194.29
14
0.3421 10,202.84
36
Total 5.9262 12.3543 31.3022 0.1137 9.8751 0.2469 10.1220 2.6359 0.2413 2.8772 12,730.76
52
12,730.76
52
0.3909 0.0465 12,754.39
43
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage7of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/3/2020 8/14/2020 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/17/2020 8/21/2020 5 5
3 Grading Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
4 Grading Soil Haul Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/5/2020 2/4/2022 5 350
6 Paving Paving 2/7/2022 2/18/2022 5 10
7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/21/2022 3/18/2022 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 209,037; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,679; Striped Parking Area: 6,835
Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 2.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage8of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Grading Soil Haul Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Soil Haul Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Soil Haul Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage9of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 1.1525 2.5306 0.2087 1.0761 1.2848 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use DPF for Construction Equipment
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 4.00 79.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 7 106.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading Soil Haul 3 8.00 0.00 9,000.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage10of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0667 2.3013 0.4895 6.1600e-
003
0.1381 7.5200e-
003
0.1456 0.0378 7.1900e-
003
0.0450 657.6093 657.6093 0.0312 658.3887
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0481 0.0339 0.3313 9.7000e-
004
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 96.2606 96.2606 2.3900e-
003
96.3203
Total 0.1311 2.7902 0.9506 8.2000e-
003
0.2719 0.0105 0.2824 0.0740 9.9800e-
003
0.0839 867.4316 867.4316 0.0391 868.4082
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 0.3413 0.3413 0.3298 0.3298 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 0.3413 1.7194 0.2087 0.3298 0.5385 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage11of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0667 2.3013 0.4895 6.1600e-
003
0.1381 7.5200e-
003
0.1456 0.0378 7.1900e-
003
0.0450 657.6093 657.6093 0.0312 658.3887
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0481 0.0339 0.3313 9.7000e-
004
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 96.2606 96.2606 2.3900e-
003
96.3203
Total 0.1311 2.7902 0.9506 8.2000e-
003
0.2719 0.0105 0.2824 0.0740 9.9800e-
003
0.0839 867.4316 867.4316 0.0391 868.4082
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.8210 0.8210 0.7553 0.7553 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.8210 6.6205 2.9537 0.7553 3.7090 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage12of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.1231 0.1231 0.1133 0.1133 0.0000 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.1231 5.9227 2.9537 0.1133 3.0670 0.0000 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage13of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.6844 5.2009 2.4827 0.6296 3.1123 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage14of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.1027 0.1027 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.1027 4.6192 2.4827 0.0944 2.5771 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage15of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.6844 5.4724 2.5238 0.6296 3.1534 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage16of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5324 87.3895 18.5875 0.2341 5.2430 0.2855 5.5285 1.4370 0.2731 1.7101 24,972.50
60
24,972.50
60
1.1839 25,002.10
25
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 2.5620 87.4103 18.7914 0.2347 5.3087 0.2859 5.5946 1.4544 0.2735 1.7279 25,031.74
33
25,031.74
33
1.1853 25,061.37
65
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.1027 0.1027 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.1027 4.8906 2.5238 0.0944 2.6182 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage17of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5324 87.3895 18.5875 0.2341 5.2430 0.2855 5.5285 1.4370 0.2731 1.7101 24,972.50
60
24,972.50
60
1.1839 25,002.10
25
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 2.5620 87.4103 18.7914 0.2347 5.3087 0.2859 5.5946 1.4544 0.2735 1.7279 25,031.74
33
25,031.74
33
1.1853 25,061.37
65
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage18of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1717 4.7777 1.3629 0.0113 0.2844 0.0239 0.3083 0.0819 0.0229 0.1047 1,192.397
2
1,192.397
2
0.0578 1,193.842
3
Worker 0.3919 0.2764 2.7014 7.8800e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 784.8941 784.8941 0.0195 785.3806
Total 0.5636 5.0540 4.0642 0.0192 1.1551 0.0293 1.1845 0.3128 0.0279 0.3407 1,977.291
3
1,977.291
3
0.0773 1,979.222
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.5443 0.5443 0.5240 0.5240 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.5443 0.5443 0.5240 0.5240 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage19of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1717 4.7777 1.3629 0.0113 0.2844 0.0239 0.3083 0.0819 0.0229 0.1047 1,192.397
2
1,192.397
2
0.0578 1,193.842
3
Worker 0.3919 0.2764 2.7014 7.8800e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 784.8941 784.8941 0.0195 785.3806
Total 0.5636 5.0540 4.0642 0.0192 1.1551 0.0293 1.1845 0.3128 0.0279 0.3407 1,977.291
3
1,977.291
3
0.0773 1,979.222
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage20of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1419 4.3078 1.2321 0.0112 0.2844 9.7500e-
003
0.2941 0.0819 9.3200e-
003
0.0912 1,181.336
0
1,181.336
0
0.0544 1,182.697
1
Worker 0.3637 0.2470 2.4660 7.6000e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 757.6542 757.6542 0.0174 758.0891
Total 0.5056 4.5547 3.6982 0.0188 1.1551 0.0150 1.1702 0.3128 0.0142 0.3270 1,938.990
2
1,938.990
2
0.0718 1,940.786
1
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.4705 0.4705 0.4527 0.4527 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.4705 0.4705 0.4527 0.4527 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage21of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1419 4.3078 1.2321 0.0112 0.2844 9.7500e-
003
0.2941 0.0819 9.3200e-
003
0.0912 1,181.336
0
1,181.336
0
0.0544 1,182.697
1
Worker 0.3637 0.2470 2.4660 7.6000e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 757.6542 757.6542 0.0174 758.0891
Total 0.5056 4.5547 3.6982 0.0188 1.1551 0.0150 1.1702 0.3128 0.0142 0.3270 1,938.990
2
1,938.990
2
0.0718 1,940.786
1
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage22of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1324 4.0707 1.1605 0.0111 0.2844 8.4800e-
003
0.2929 0.0819 8.1100e-
003
0.0900 1,169.918
4
1,169.918
4
0.0520 1,171.217
6
Worker 0.3399 0.2216 2.2633 7.3200e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 730.1386 730.1386 0.0156 730.5280
Total 0.4723 4.2922 3.4238 0.0184 1.1551 0.0137 1.1688 0.3128 0.0129 0.3257 1,900.056
9
1,900.056
9
0.0676 1,901.745
5
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.4066 0.4066 0.3911 0.3911 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.4066 0.4066 0.3911 0.3911 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage23of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1324 4.0707 1.1605 0.0111 0.2844 8.4800e-
003
0.2929 0.0819 8.1100e-
003
0.0900 1,169.918
4
1,169.918
4
0.0520 1,171.217
6
Worker 0.3399 0.2216 2.2633 7.3200e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 730.1386 730.1386 0.0156 730.5280
Total 0.4723 4.2922 3.4238 0.0184 1.1551 0.0137 1.1688 0.3128 0.0129 0.3257 1,900.056
9
1,900.056
9
0.0676 1,901.745
5
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage24of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Total 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.0612 0.0612 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.0612 0.0612 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage25of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Total 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage26of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Total 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage27of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Total 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage28of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.2571 10.2404 29.4968 0.1010 9.8751 0.0862 9.9613 2.6359 0.0805 2.7164 10,194.29
14
10,194.29
14
0.3421 10,202.84
36
Unmitigated 2.2571 10.2404 29.4968 0.1010 9.8751 0.0862 9.9613 2.6359 0.0805 2.7164 10,194.29
14
10,194.29
14
0.3421 10,202.84
36
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,659.84 1,659.84 1659.84 4,668,392 4,668,392
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,659.84 1,659.84 1,659.84 4,668,392 4,668,392
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 100 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage29of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Hotel 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Parking Lot 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Quality Restaurant 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage30of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15660.2 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5899.24 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage31of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15.6602 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5.89924 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage32of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage33of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage34of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:07PMPage35of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Winter
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 95.92 1000sqft 0.01 95,923.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 12.86 1000sqft 0.30 0.00 0
Parking Lot 18.00 1000sqft 0.41 18,000.00 0
Hotel 156.00 Room 0.42 129,000.00 0
Quality Restaurant 10.36 1000sqft 0.24 10,358.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 58
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2022OperationalYear
CO2 Intensity
lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4Intensity
lb/MWhr)
0.006N2OIntensity
lb/MWhr)
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation
Santa Clara County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage1of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about intensity factors.
Land Use - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about parking lot and hotel land use sizes.
Construction Phase - Consistent with IS's model.
Off-road Equipment - No change. See SWAPE comment about equipment unit amounts.
Trips and VMT - Consistent with IS's model.
Demolition -
Grading - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about grading.
Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS's model.
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See SWAPE comment about water use rates and wastewater treatment system percentages.
Solid Waste - See SWAPE comment about solid waste generation rates.
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment about construction mitigation measures.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage2of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 350.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 72,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 95,920.00 95,923.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 12,860.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 226,512.00 129,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,360.00 10,358.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.20 0.01
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.20 0.42
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 64.00 79.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 38.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 4.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 58.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.64
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage3of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 10.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,957,216.12 11,103,300.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage4of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.2352 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 1.6527 16.3588 6.4861 1.5309 8.0170 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.571
1
2021 2.2878 18.1080 16.6467 0.0418 1.1551 0.6991 1.8542 0.3128 0.6747 0.9875 0.0000 4,038.1124 4,038.1124 0.4265 0.0000 4,048.775
5
2022 75.3101 16.7235 16.2013 0.0414 1.1551 0.6023 1.7574 0.3128 0.5815 0.8943 0.0000 3,996.934
5
3,996.934
5
0.4137 0.0000 4,007.276
8
Maximum 75.3101 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 1.6527 16.3588 6.4861 1.5309 8.0170 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.57
11
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.2352 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 0.5733 15.1953 6.4861 0.5515 6.9466 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.571
1
2021 2.2878 18.1080 16.6467 0.0418 1.1551 0.4852 1.6404 0.3128 0.4666 0.7794 0.0000 4,038.1124 4,038.1124 0.4265 0.0000 4,048.775
5
2022 75.3101 16.7235 16.2013 0.0414 1.1551 0.4199 1.5751 0.3128 0.4037 0.7166 0.0000 3,996.934
5
3,996.934
5
0.4137 0.0000 4,007.276
8
Maximum 75.3101 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 0.5733 15.1953 6.4861 0.5515 6.9466 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.57
11
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage5of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.95 7.81 0.00 48.99 14.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage6of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 2.5901 9.6694 30.2985 0.1084 9.8751 0.0857 9.9608 2.6359 0.0801 2.7160 10,933.50
37
10,933.50
37
0.3417 10,942.04
58
Total 6.2592 11.7833 32.1040 0.1211 9.8751 0.2464 10.1216 2.6359 0.2408 2.8767 13,469.97
75
13,469.97
75
0.3905 0.0465 13,493.59
65
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 2.5901 9.6694 30.2985 0.1084 9.8751 0.0857 9.9608 2.6359 0.0801 2.7160 10,933.50
37
10,933.50
37
0.3417 10,942.04
58
Total 6.2592 11.7833 32.1040 0.1211 9.8751 0.2464 10.1216 2.6359 0.2408 2.8767 13,469.97
75
13,469.97
75
0.3905 0.0465 13,493.59
65
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage7of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/3/2020 8/14/2020 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/17/2020 8/21/2020 5 5
3 Grading Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
4 Grading Soil Haul Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/5/2020 2/4/2022 5 350
6 Paving Paving 2/7/2022 2/18/2022 5 10
7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/21/2022 3/18/2022 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 209,037; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,679; Striped Parking Area: 6,835
Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 2.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage8of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Grading Soil Haul Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Soil Haul Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Soil Haul Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage9of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 1.1525 2.5306 0.2087 1.0761 1.2848 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use DPF for Construction Equipment
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 4.00 79.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 7 106.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading Soil Haul 3 8.00 0.00 9,000.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage10of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0649 2.2464 0.4549 6.2700e-
003
0.1381 7.4000e-
003
0.1455 0.0378 7.0800e-
003
0.0449 668.9482 668.9482 0.0298 669.6925
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0452 0.0278 0.3575 1.0500e-
003
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 104.7808 104.7808 2.5600e-
003
104.8449
Total 0.1256 2.7240 0.9263 8.4200e-
003
0.2719 0.0103 0.2822 0.0740 9.8300e-
003
0.0838 890.2486 890.2486 0.0374 891.1848
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 0.3413 0.3413 0.3298 0.3298 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 0.3413 1.7194 0.2087 0.3298 0.5385 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage11of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0649 2.2464 0.4549 6.2700e-
003
0.1381 7.4000e-
003
0.1455 0.0378 7.0800e-
003
0.0449 668.9482 668.9482 0.0298 669.6925
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0452 0.0278 0.3575 1.0500e-
003
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 104.7808 104.7808 2.5600e-
003
104.8449
Total 0.1256 2.7240 0.9263 8.4200e-
003
0.2719 0.0103 0.2822 0.0740 9.8300e-
003
0.0838 890.2486 890.2486 0.0374 891.1848
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.8210 0.8210 0.7553 0.7553 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.8210 6.6205 2.9537 0.7553 3.7090 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage12of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.1231 0.1231 0.1133 0.1133 0.0000 1,667.4119 1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.1231 5.9227 2.9537 0.1133 3.0670 0.0000 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage13of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.6844 5.2009 2.4827 0.6296 3.1123 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage14of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.1027 0.1027 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.1027 4.6192 2.4827 0.0944 2.5771 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage15of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.6844 5.4724 2.5238 0.6296 3.1534 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage16of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.4644 85.3080 17.2727 0.2381 5.2430 0.2809 5.5239 1.4370 0.2688 1.7057 25,403.09
70
25,403.09
70
1.1306 25,431.36
21
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 2.4922 85.3251 17.4928 0.2387 5.3087 0.2813 5.5900 1.4544 0.2691 1.7235 25,467.57
76
25,467.57
76
1.1322 25,495.88
21
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.1027 0.1027 0.0944 0.0944 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.1027 4.8906 2.5238 0.0944 2.6182 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage17of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.4644 85.3080 17.2727 0.2381 5.2430 0.2809 5.5239 1.4370 0.2688 1.7057 25,403.09
70
25,403.09
70
1.1306 25,431.36
21
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 2.4922 85.3251 17.4928 0.2387 5.3087 0.2813 5.5900 1.4544 0.2691 1.7235 25,467.57
76
25,467.57
76
1.1322 25,495.88
21
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage18of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1632 4.7231 1.1962 0.0116 0.2844 0.0235 0.3079 0.0819 0.0225 0.1044 1,223.455
3
1,223.455
3
0.0537 1,224.797
1
Worker 0.3684 0.2262 2.9154 8.5700e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 854.3668 854.3668 0.0209 854.8895
Total 0.5316 4.9494 4.1115 0.0202 1.1551 0.0290 1.1841 0.3128 0.0275 0.3403 2,077.822
1
2,077.822
1
0.0746 2,079.686
6
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.5443 0.5443 0.5240 0.5240 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.5443 0.5443 0.5240 0.5240 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage19of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1632 4.7231 1.1962 0.0116 0.2844 0.0235 0.3079 0.0819 0.0225 0.1044 1,223.455
3
1,223.455
3
0.0537 1,224.797
1
Worker 0.3684 0.2262 2.9154 8.5700e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 854.3668 854.3668 0.0209 854.8895
Total 0.5316 4.9494 4.1115 0.0202 1.1551 0.0290 1.1841 0.3128 0.0275 0.3403 2,077.822
1
2,077.822
1
0.0746 2,079.686
6
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage20of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1339 4.2697 1.0761 0.0115 0.2844 9.4400e-
003
0.2938 0.0819 9.0300e-
003
0.0909 1,212.200
9
1,212.200
9
0.0505 1,213.463
9
Worker 0.3413 0.2022 2.6712 8.2700e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 824.6915 824.6915 0.0187 825.1600
Total 0.4753 4.4719 3.7473 0.0197 1.1551 0.0147 1.1699 0.3128 0.0139 0.3267 2,036.892
4
2,036.892
4
0.0693 2,038.623
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.4705 0.4705 0.4527 0.4527 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.4705 0.4705 0.4527 0.4527 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage21of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1339 4.2697 1.0761 0.0115 0.2844 9.4400e-
003
0.2938 0.0819 9.0300e-
003
0.0909 1,212.200
9
1,212.200
9
0.0505 1,213.463
9
Worker 0.3413 0.2022 2.6712 8.2700e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 824.6915 824.6915 0.0187 825.1600
Total 0.4753 4.4719 3.7473 0.0197 1.1551 0.0147 1.1699 0.3128 0.0139 0.3267 2,036.892
4
2,036.892
4
0.0693 2,038.623
8
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage22of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1249 4.0389 1.0135 0.0114 0.2844 8.2000e-
003
0.2926 0.0819 7.8400e-
003
0.0897 1,200.687
6
1,200.687
6
0.0483 1,201.894
0
Worker 0.3181 0.1815 2.4615 7.9700e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 794.7040 794.7040 0.0168 795.1247
Total 0.4430 4.2204 3.4749 0.0193 1.1551 0.0134 1.1685 0.3128 0.0126 0.3254 1,995.391
7
1,995.391
7
0.0651 1,997.018
7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.4066 0.4066 0.3911 0.3911 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.4066 0.4066 0.3911 0.3911 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage23of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1249 4.0389 1.0135 0.0114 0.2844 8.2000e-
003
0.2926 0.0819 7.8400e-
003
0.0897 1,200.687
6
1,200.687
6
0.0483 1,201.894
0
Worker 0.3181 0.1815 2.4615 7.9700e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 794.7040 794.7040 0.0168 795.1247
Total 0.4430 4.2204 3.4749 0.0193 1.1551 0.0134 1.1685 0.3128 0.0126 0.3254 1,995.391
7
1,995.391
7
0.0651 1,997.018
7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage24of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Total 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.0612 0.0612 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.0612 0.0612 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage25of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Total 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage26of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Total 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage27of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Total 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage28of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.5901 9.6694 30.2985 0.1084 9.8751 0.0857 9.9608 2.6359 0.0801 2.7160 10,933.50
37
10,933.50
37
0.3417 10,942.04
58
Unmitigated 2.5901 9.6694 30.2985 0.1084 9.8751 0.0857 9.9608 2.6359 0.0801 2.7160 10,933.50
37
10,933.50
37
0.3417 10,942.04
58
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,659.84 1,659.84 1659.84 4,668,392 4,668,392
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,659.84 1,659.84 1,659.84 4,668,392 4,668,392
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 100 0 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage29of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Hotel 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Parking Lot 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Quality Restaurant 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage30of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15660.2 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5899.24 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage31of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15.6602 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5.89924 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage32of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage33of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage34of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:08PMPage35of35
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - HRA Mitigation - Santa Clara County, Summer
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 95.92 1000sqft 0.01 95,923.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 12.86 1000sqft 0.30 0.00 0
Parking Lot 18.00 1000sqft 0.41 18,000.00 0
Hotel 156.00 Room 0.42 129,000.00 0
Quality Restaurant 10.36 1000sqft 0.24 10,358.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 58
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2022OperationalYear
CO2 Intensity
lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4Intensity
lb/MWhr)
0.006N2OIntensity
lb/MWhr)
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022
Santa Clara County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage1of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about intensity factors.
Land Use - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about parking lot and hotel land use sizes.
Construction Phase - Consistent with IS's model.
Off-road Equipment - No change. See SWAPE comment about equipment unit amounts.
Trips and VMT - Consistent with IS's model.
Demolition -
Grading - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about grading.
Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS's model.
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See SWAPE comment about water use rates and wastewater treatment system percentages.
Solid Waste - See SWAPE comment about solid waste generation rates.
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment about construction mitigation measures.
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 350.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage2of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 72,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 95,920.00 95,923.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 12,860.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 226,512.00 129,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,360.00 10,358.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.20 0.01
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.20 0.42
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 64.00 79.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.64
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 10.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,957,216.12 11,103,300.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage3of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.1759 2.5658 1.1145 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0591 0.3359 0.1153 0.0558 0.1711 0.0000 518.5810 518.5810 0.0449 0.0000 519.7039
2021 0.2970 2.3722 2.1497 5.3600e-
003
0.1458 0.0913 0.2370 0.0396 0.0881 0.1277 0.0000 469.7131 469.7131 0.0506 0.0000 470.9768
2022 0.7833 0.2583 0.2684 6.3000e-
004
0.0161 0.0101 0.0262 4.3700e-
003
9.7000e-
003
0.0141 0.0000 54.7272 54.7272 6.7700e-
003
0.0000 54.8964
Maximum 0.7833 2.5658 2.1497 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0913 0.3359 0.1153 0.0881 0.1711 0.0000 518.5810 518.5810 0.0506 0.0000 519.7039
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.1759 2.5658 1.1145 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0591 0.3359 0.1153 0.0558 0.1711 0.0000 518.5809 518.5809 0.0449 0.0000 519.7038
2021 0.2970 2.3722 2.1497 5.3600e-
003
0.1458 0.0913 0.2370 0.0396 0.0881 0.1277 0.0000 469.7128 469.7128 0.0506 0.0000 470.9765
2022 0.7833 0.2583 0.2684 6.3000e-
004
0.0161 0.0101 0.0262 4.3700e-
003
9.7000e-
003
0.0141 0.0000 54.7272 54.7272 6.7700e-
003
0.0000 54.8963
Maximum 0.7833 2.5658 2.1497 5.5400e-
003
0.2768 0.0913 0.3359 0.1153 0.0881 0.1711 0.0000 518.5809 518.5809 0.0506 0.0000 519.7038
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage4of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 8-3-2020 11-2-2020 3.6039 3.6039
2 11-3-2020 2-2-2021 0.7145 0.7145
3 2-3-2021 5-2-2021 0.6506 0.6506
4 5-3-2021 8-2-2021 0.6701 0.6701
5 8-3-2021 11-2-2021 0.6715 0.6715
6 11-3-2021 2-2-2022 0.6551 0.6551
7 2-3-2022 5-2-2022 0.7591 0.7591
Highest 3.6039 3.6039
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage5of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Energy 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 969.8418 969.8418 0.0329 0.0128 974.4919
Mobile 0.3619 1.4753 3.8894 0.0129 1.1727 0.0111 1.1838 0.3139 0.0104 0.3243 0.0000 1,182.068
8
1,182.068
8
0.0417 0.0000 1,183.1103
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.2557 0.0000 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.5202 23.0800 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5641
Total 1.0313 1.8611 4.2162 0.0152 1.1727 0.0404 1.2131 0.3139 0.0397 0.3536 23.7759 2,174.995
8
2,198.771
7
1.6779 0.0240 2,247.877
1
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage6of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Energy 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 969.8418 969.8418 0.0329 0.0128 974.4919
Mobile 0.3619 1.4753 3.8894 0.0129 1.1727 0.0111 1.1838 0.3139 0.0104 0.3243 0.0000 1,182.068
8
1,182.068
8
0.0417 0.0000 1,183.1103
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.2557 0.0000 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.5202 23.0402 27.5604 0.4653 0.0112 42.5242
Total 1.0313 1.8611 4.2162 0.0152 1.1727 0.0404 1.2131 0.3139 0.0397 0.3536 23.7759 2,174.956
0
2,198.732
0
1.6779 0.0240 2,247.837
2
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage7of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/3/2020 8/14/2020 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/17/2020 8/21/2020 5 5
3 Grading Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
4 Grading Soil Haul Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/5/2020 2/4/2022 5 350
6 Paving Paving 2/7/2022 2/18/2022 5 10
7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/21/2022 3/18/2022 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 209,037; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,679; Striped Parking Area: 6,835
Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 2.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage8of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Soil Haul Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Soil Haul Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Soil Haul Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage9of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.8900e-
003
0.0000 6.8900e-
003
1.0400e-
003
0.0000 1.0400e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
5.7600e-
003
5.7600e-
003
5.3800e-
003
5.3800e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Total 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
6.8900e-
003
5.7600e-
003
0.0127 1.0400e-
003
5.3800e-
003
6.4200e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 4.00 79.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading Soil Haul 3 8.00 0.00 9,000.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 7 106.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage10of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.3000e-
004
0.0115 2.3500e-
003
3.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 3.0127 3.0127 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 3.0161
Vendor 8.0000e-
005
2.2800e-
003
6.1000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.4000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5229 0.5229 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5235
Worker 2.2000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
1.6300e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4421 0.4421 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4424
Total 6.3000e-
004
0.0139 4.5900e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3200e-
003
5.0000e-
005
1.3700e-
003
3.6000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.9777 3.9777 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 3.9820
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.8900e-
003
0.0000 6.8900e-
003
1.0400e-
003
0.0000 1.0400e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
5.7600e-
003
5.7600e-
003
5.3800e-
003
5.3800e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Total 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e-
004
6.8900e-
003
5.7600e-
003
0.0127 1.0400e-
003
5.3800e-
003
6.4200e-
003
0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e-
003
0.0000 10.6015
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage11of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.3000e-
004
0.0115 2.3500e-
003
3.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
7.1000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
004
0.0000 3.0127 3.0127 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 3.0161
Vendor 8.0000e-
005
2.2800e-
003
6.1000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
1.4000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5229 0.5229 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.5235
Worker 2.2000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
1.6300e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4421 0.4421 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4424
Total 6.3000e-
004
0.0139 4.5900e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3200e-
003
5.0000e-
005
1.3700e-
003
3.6000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 3.9777 3.9777 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 3.9820
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0145 0.0000 0.0145 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
2.0500e-
003
2.0500e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Total 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
0.0145 2.0500e-
003
0.0166 7.3800e-
003
1.8900e-
003
9.2700e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage12of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 4.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
3.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2614 0.2614 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2617
Worker 7.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1360 0.1360 0.0000 0.0000 0.1361
Total 1.1000e-
004
1.1900e-
003
8.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.3000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
6.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3975 0.3975 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3979
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0145 0.0000 0.0145 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 7.3800e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
2.0500e-
003
2.0500e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Total 4.0700e-
003
0.0459 0.0193 4.0000e-
005
0.0145 2.0500e-
003
0.0166 7.3800e-
003
1.8900e-
003
9.2700e-
003
0.0000 3.7816 3.7816 1.2200e-
003
0.0000 3.8122
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage13of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 4.0000e-
005
1.1400e-
003
3.0000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
7.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2614 0.2614 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.2617
Worker 7.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
005
5.0000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
0.0000 1.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
0.0000 4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.1360 0.1360 0.0000 0.0000 0.1361
Total 1.1000e-
004
1.1900e-
003
8.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.3000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.3000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
6.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3975 0.3975 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.3979
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0678 0.0000 0.0678 0.0372 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0103 0.0103 9.4400e-
003
9.4400e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0678 0.0103 0.0780 0.0372 9.4400e-
003
0.0467 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage14of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4000e-
004
6.8300e-
003
1.8200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
4.3000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
1.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.5687 1.5687 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.5705
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 6.4000e-
004
7.1200e-
003
4.8200e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.3848 2.3848 9.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.3871
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0678 0.0000 0.0678 0.0372 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0103 0.0103 9.4400e-
003
9.4400e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0678 0.0103 0.0780 0.0372 9.4400e-
003
0.0467 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage15of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4000e-
004
6.8300e-
003
1.8200e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
4.3000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
1.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.5687 1.5687 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.5705
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 6.4000e-
004
7.1200e-
003
4.8200e-
003
3.0000e-
005
1.3400e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.3900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.1000e-
004
0.0000 2.3848 2.3848 9.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.3871
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0718 0.0000 0.0718 0.0379 0.0000 0.0379 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0103 0.0103 9.4400e-
003
9.4400e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0718 0.0103 0.0821 0.0379 9.4400e-
003
0.0473 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7347
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage16of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0374 1.3058 0.2674 3.5500e-
003
0.0763 4.2400e-
003
0.0805 0.0210 4.0600e-
003
0.0250 0.0000 343.2186 343.2186 0.0157 0.0000 343.6111
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 0.0378 1.3061 0.2704 3.5600e-
003
0.0772 4.2500e-
003
0.0815 0.0212 4.0700e-
003
0.0253 0.0000 344.0348 344.0348 0.0157 0.0000 344.4278
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0718 0.0000 0.0718 0.0379 0.0000 0.0379 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0103 0.0103 9.4400e-
003
9.4400e-
003
0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Total 0.0203 0.2263 0.0968 2.1000e-
004
0.0718 0.0103 0.0821 0.0379 9.4400e-
003
0.0473 0.0000 18.5844 18.5844 6.0100e-
003
0.0000 18.7346
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage17of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0374 1.3058 0.2674 3.5500e-
003
0.0763 4.2400e-
003
0.0805 0.0210 4.0600e-
003
0.0250 0.0000 343.2186 343.2186 0.0157 0.0000 343.6111
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 4.0000e-
004
2.9000e-
004
3.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
2.6000e-
004
0.0000 0.8162 0.8162 2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.8167
Total 0.0378 1.3061 0.2704 3.5600e-
003
0.0772 4.2500e-
003
0.0815 0.0212 4.0700e-
003
0.0253 0.0000 344.0348 344.0348 0.0157 0.0000 344.4278
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0255 0.0255 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 58.0935 58.0935 0.0108 0.0000 58.3631
Total 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0255 0.0255 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 58.0935 58.0935 0.0108 0.0000 58.3631
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage18of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 5.3300e-
003
0.1530 0.0408 3.7000e-
004
8.8400e-
003
7.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
003
2.5600e-
003
7.3000e-
004
3.2800e-
003
0.0000 35.1379 35.1379 1.6100e-
003
0.0000 35.1782
Worker 0.0113 8.1000e-
003
0.0849 2.6000e-
004
0.0269 1.7000e-
004
0.0271 7.1500e-
003
1.6000e-
004
7.3100e-
003
0.0000 23.0707 23.0707 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 23.0848
Total 0.0166 0.1611 0.1257 6.3000e-
004
0.0357 9.3000e-
004
0.0367 9.7100e-
003
8.9000e-
004
0.0106 0.0000 58.2086 58.2086 2.1800e-
003
0.0000 58.2630
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0255 0.0255 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 58.0934 58.0934 0.0108 0.0000 58.3630
Total 0.0650 0.4732 0.4220 7.1000e-
004
0.0255 0.0255 0.0246 0.0246 0.0000 58.0934 58.0934 0.0108 0.0000 58.3630
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage19of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 5.3300e-
003
0.1530 0.0408 3.7000e-
004
8.8400e-
003
7.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
003
2.5600e-
003
7.3000e-
004
3.2800e-
003
0.0000 35.1379 35.1379 1.6100e-
003
0.0000 35.1782
Worker 0.0113 8.1000e-
003
0.0849 2.6000e-
004
0.0269 1.7000e-
004
0.0271 7.1500e-
003
1.6000e-
004
7.3100e-
003
0.0000 23.0707 23.0707 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 23.0848
Total 0.0166 0.1611 0.1257 6.3000e-
004
0.0357 9.3000e-
004
0.0367 9.7100e-
003
8.9000e-
004
0.0106 0.0000 58.2086 58.2086 2.1800e-
003
0.0000 58.2630
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0893 0.0893 0.0862 0.0862 0.0000 236.9197 236.9197 0.0423 0.0000 237.9771
Total 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0893 0.0893 0.0862 0.0862 0.0000 236.9197 236.9197 0.0423 0.0000 237.9771
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage20of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0179 0.5632 0.1499 1.4800e-
003
0.0361 1.2500e-
003
0.0373 0.0104 1.1900e-
003
0.0116 0.0000 141.9740 141.9740 6.1900e-
003
0.0000 142.1287
Worker 0.0426 0.0295 0.3164 1.0000e-
003
0.1097 6.9000e-
004
0.1104 0.0292 6.4000e-
004
0.0298 0.0000 90.8194 90.8194 2.0700e-
003
0.0000 90.8711
Total 0.0605 0.5927 0.4664 2.4800e-
003
0.1458 1.9400e-
003
0.1477 0.0396 1.8300e-
003
0.0414 0.0000 232.7934 232.7934 8.2600e-
003
0.0000 232.9998
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0893 0.0893 0.0862 0.0862 0.0000 236.9194 236.9194 0.0423 0.0000 237.9768
Total 0.2365 1.7795 1.6834 2.8800e-
003
0.0893 0.0893 0.0862 0.0862 0.0000 236.9194 236.9194 0.0423 0.0000 237.9768
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage21of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0179 0.5632 0.1499 1.4800e-
003
0.0361 1.2500e-
003
0.0373 0.0104 1.1900e-
003
0.0116 0.0000 141.9740 141.9740 6.1900e-
003
0.0000 142.1287
Worker 0.0426 0.0295 0.3164 1.0000e-
003
0.1097 6.9000e-
004
0.1104 0.0292 6.4000e-
004
0.0298 0.0000 90.8194 90.8194 2.0700e-
003
0.0000 90.8711
Total 0.0605 0.5927 0.4664 2.4800e-
003
0.1458 1.9400e-
003
0.1477 0.0396 1.8300e-
003
0.0414 0.0000 232.7934 232.7934 8.2600e-
003
0.0000 232.9998
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
7.3600e-
003
7.3600e-
003
7.1100e-
003
7.1100e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Total 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
7.3600e-
003
7.3600e-
003
7.1100e-
003
7.1100e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage22of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.6000e-
003
0.0510 0.0135 1.4000e-
004
3.4500e-
003
1.0000e-
004
3.5600e-
003
1.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
004
1.1000e-
003
0.0000 13.4689 13.4689 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 13.4831
Worker 3.8100e-
003
2.5400e-
003
0.0279 9.0000e-
005
0.0105 6.0000e-
005
0.0106 2.7900e-
003
6.0000e-
005
2.8500e-
003
0.0000 8.3832 8.3832 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 8.3876
Total 5.4100e-
003
0.0535 0.0414 2.3000e-
004
0.0140 1.6000e-
004
0.0141 3.7900e-
003
1.6000e-
004
3.9500e-
003
0.0000 21.8521 21.8521 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 21.8707
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
7.3600e-
003
7.3600e-
003
7.1100e-
003
7.1100e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Total 0.0206 0.1563 0.1591 2.8000e-
004
7.3600e-
003
7.3600e-
003
7.1100e-
003
7.1100e-
003
0.0000 22.6971 22.6971 3.9500e-
003
0.0000 22.7959
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage23of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 1.6000e-
003
0.0510 0.0135 1.4000e-
004
3.4500e-
003
1.0000e-
004
3.5600e-
003
1.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
004
1.1000e-
003
0.0000 13.4689 13.4689 5.7000e-
004
0.0000 13.4831
Worker 3.8100e-
003
2.5400e-
003
0.0279 9.0000e-
005
0.0105 6.0000e-
005
0.0106 2.7900e-
003
6.0000e-
005
2.8500e-
003
0.0000 8.3832 8.3832 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 8.3876
Total 5.4100e-
003
0.0535 0.0414 2.3000e-
004
0.0140 1.6000e-
004
0.0141 3.7900e-
003
1.6000e-
004
3.9500e-
003
0.0000 21.8521 21.8521 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 21.8707
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4400e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
1.7400e-
003
1.7400e-
003
1.6000e-
003
1.6000e-
003
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9315
Paving 5.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.9800e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
1.7400e-
003
1.7400e-
003
1.6000e-
003
1.6000e-
003
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9315
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage24of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Total 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4400e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
1.7400e-
003
1.7400e-
003
1.6000e-
003
1.6000e-
003
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9314
Paving 5.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.9800e-
003
0.0339 0.0440 7.0000e-
005
1.7400e-
003
1.7400e-
003
1.6000e-
003
1.6000e-
003
0.0000 5.8848 5.8848 1.8700e-
003
0.0000 5.9314
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage25of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Total 1.9000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
1.3700e-
003
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.2000e-
004
1.4000e-
004
0.0000 1.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.4113 0.4113 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4115
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.7504 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.0500e-
003
0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Total 0.7525 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage26of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Total 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.7504 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.0500e-
003
0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Total 0.7525 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e-
005
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
8.2000e-
004
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 2.5574
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage27of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Implement Trip Reduction Program
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Total 6.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6800e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000 1.3287 1.3287 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.3294
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage28of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3619 1.4753 3.8894 0.0129 1.1727 0.0111 1.1838 0.3139 0.0104 0.3243 0.0000 1,182.068
8
1,182.068
8
0.0417 0.0000 1,183.1103
Unmitigated 0.3619 1.4753 3.8894 0.0129 1.1727 0.0111 1.1838 0.3139 0.0104 0.3243 0.0000 1,182.068
8
1,182.068
8
0.0417 0.0000 1,183.1103
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,659.84 1,659.84 1659.84 3,153,581 3,153,581
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,659.84 1,659.84 1,659.84 3,153,581 3,153,581
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage29of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 549.9107 549.9107 0.0249 5.1400e-
003
552.0654
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 549.9107 549.9107 0.0249 5.1400e-
003
552.0654
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Hotel 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Parking Lot 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Quality Restaurant 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage30of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 5.71599e
006
0.0308 0.2802 0.2354 1.6800e-
003
0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0000 305.0270 305.0270 5.8500e-
003
5.5900e-
003
306.8396
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
2.15322e
006
0.0116 0.1056 0.0887 6.3000e-
004
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
0.0000 114.9041 114.9041 2.2000e-
003
2.1100e-
003
115.5869
Total 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage31of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 5.71599e
006
0.0308 0.2802 0.2354 1.6800e-
003
0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0000 305.0270 305.0270 5.8500e-
003
5.5900e-
003
306.8396
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
2.15322e
006
0.0116 0.1056 0.0887 6.3000e-
004
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
8.0200e-
003
0.0000 114.9041 114.9041 2.2000e-
003
2.1100e-
003
115.5869
Total 0.0424 0.3858 0.3240 2.3100e-
003
0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0293 0.0000 419.9311 419.9311 8.0500e-
003
7.7000e-
003
422.4265
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage32of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
562109 163.5239 7.3900e-
003
1.5300e-
003
164.1646
Hotel 982980 285.9602 0.0129 2.6800e-
003
287.0806
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6300 1.8327 8.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.8399
Quality
Restaurant
338914 98.5939 4.4600e-
003
9.2000e-
004
98.9802
Total 549.9107 0.0249 5.1500e-
003
552.0654
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage33of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
562109 163.5239 7.3900e-
003
1.5300e-
003
164.1646
Hotel 982980 285.9602 0.0129 2.6800e-
003
287.0806
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 6300 1.8327 8.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
1.8399
Quality
Restaurant
338914 98.5939 4.4600e-
003
9.2000e-
004
98.9802
Total 549.9107 0.0249 5.1500e-
003
552.0654
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage34of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Unmitigated 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.5516 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Total 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage35of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.5516 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Total 0.6269 2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
003
0.0000 1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.2400e-
003
5.2400e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 5.5800e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage36of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 27.5604 0.4653 0.0112 42.5242
Unmitigated 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5641
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 11.1033 /
0.439691
21.4482 0.3626 8.7100e-
003
33.1093
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
3.14461 /
0.20072
6.1520 0.1027 2.4700e-
003
9.4549
Total 27.6002 0.4653 0.0112 42.5642
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage37of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 11.1033 /
0.41287
21.4209 0.3626 8.7100e-
003
33.0818
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
3.14461 /
0.188476
6.1395 0.1027 2.4700e-
003
9.4424
Total 27.5604 0.4653 0.0112 42.5242
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage38of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Unmitigated 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Category/Year
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 85.41 17.3375 1.0246 0.0000 42.9528
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
9.45 1.9183 0.1134 0.0000 4.7524
Total 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage39of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 85.41 17.3375 1.0246 0.0000 42.9528
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
9.45 1.9183 0.1134 0.0000 4.7524
Total 19.2557 1.1380 0.0000 47.7052
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage40of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
11.0 Vegetation
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:28PMPage41of41
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Annual
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 95.92 1000sqft 0.01 95,923.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 12.86 1000sqft 0.30 0.00 0
Parking Lot 18.00 1000sqft 0.41 18,000.00 0
Hotel 156.00 Room 0.42 129,000.00 0
Quality Restaurant 10.36 1000sqft 0.24 10,358.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 58
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2022OperationalYear
CO2 Intensity
lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4Intensity
lb/MWhr)
0.006N2OIntensity
lb/MWhr)
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022
Santa Clara County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage1of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about intensity factors.
Land Use - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about parking lot and hotel land use sizes.
Construction Phase - Consistent with IS's model.
Off-road Equipment - No change. See SWAPE comment about equipment unit amounts.
Trips and VMT - Consistent with IS's model.
Demolition -
Grading - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about grading.
Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS's model.
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See SWAPE comment about water use rates and wastewater treatment system percentages.
Solid Waste - See SWAPE comment about solid waste generation rates.
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment about construction mitigation measures.
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 350.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage2of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 72,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 95,920.00 95,923.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 12,860.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 226,512.00 129,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,360.00 10,358.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.20 0.01
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.20 0.42
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 64.00 79.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.64
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 10.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,957,216.12 11,103,300.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage3of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.2352 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 1.6527 16.3588 6.4861 1.5309 8.0170 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.571
1
2021 2.2878 18.1080 16.6467 0.0418 1.1551 0.6991 1.8542 0.3128 0.6747 0.9875 0.0000 4,038.1124 4,038.1124 0.4265 0.0000 4,048.775
5
2022 75.3101 16.7235 16.2013 0.0414 1.1551 0.6023 1.7574 0.3128 0.5815 0.8943 0.0000 3,996.934
5
3,996.934
5
0.4137 0.0000 4,007.276
8
Maximum 75.3101 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 1.6527 16.3588 6.4861 1.5309 8.0170 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.57
11
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.2352 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 1.6527 16.3588 6.4861 1.5309 8.0170 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.571
1
2021 2.2878 18.1080 16.6467 0.0418 1.1551 0.6991 1.8542 0.3128 0.6747 0.9875 0.0000 4,038.1124 4,038.1124 0.4265 0.0000 4,048.775
5
2022 75.3101 16.7235 16.2013 0.0414 1.1551 0.6023 1.7574 0.3128 0.5815 0.8943 0.0000 3,996.934
5
3,996.934
5
0.4137 0.0000 4,007.276
8
Maximum 75.3101 115.9627 30.7353 0.2687 14.7060 1.6527 16.3588 6.4861 1.5309 8.0170 0.0000 28,380.01
43
28,380.01
43
2.0223 0.0000 28,430.57
11
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage4of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage5of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 2.3001 7.8751 22.1764 0.0752 6.6708 0.0609 6.7317 1.7806 0.0569 1.8375 7,588.458
1
7,588.458
1
0.2539 7,594.806
3
Total 5.9692 9.9890 23.9818 0.0879 6.6708 0.2217 6.8925 1.7806 0.2176 1.9982 10,124.93
19
10,124.93
19
0.3027 0.0465 10,146.35
70
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 2.3001 7.8751 22.1764 0.0752 6.6708 0.0609 6.7317 1.7806 0.0569 1.8375 7,588.458
1
7,588.458
1
0.2539 7,594.806
3
Total 5.9692 9.9890 23.9818 0.0879 6.6708 0.2217 6.8925 1.7806 0.2176 1.9982 10,124.93
19
10,124.93
19
0.3027 0.0465 10,146.35
70
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage6of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/3/2020 8/14/2020 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/17/2020 8/21/2020 5 5
3 Grading Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
4 Grading Soil Haul Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/5/2020 2/4/2022 5 350
6 Paving Paving 2/7/2022 2/18/2022 5 10
7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/21/2022 3/18/2022 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 209,037; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,679; Striped Parking Area: 6,835
Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 2.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage7of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Soil Haul Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Soil Haul Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Soil Haul Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage8of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 1.1525 2.5306 0.2087 1.0761 1.2848 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 4.00 79.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading Soil Haul 3 8.00 0.00 9,000.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 7 106.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage9of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0649 2.2464 0.4549 6.2700e-
003
0.1381 7.4000e-
003
0.1455 0.0378 7.0800e-
003
0.0449 668.9482 668.9482 0.0298 669.6925
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0452 0.0278 0.3575 1.0500e-
003
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 104.7808 104.7808 2.5600e-
003
104.8449
Total 0.1256 2.7240 0.9263 8.4200e-
003
0.2719 0.0103 0.2822 0.0740 9.8300e-
003
0.0838 890.2486 890.2486 0.0374 891.1848
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 1.1525 2.5306 0.2087 1.0761 1.2848 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage10of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0649 2.2464 0.4549 6.2700e-
003
0.1381 7.4000e-
003
0.1455 0.0378 7.0800e-
003
0.0449 668.9482 668.9482 0.0298 669.6925
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0452 0.0278 0.3575 1.0500e-
003
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 104.7808 104.7808 2.5600e-
003
104.8449
Total 0.1256 2.7240 0.9263 8.4200e-
003
0.2719 0.0103 0.2822 0.0740 9.8300e-
003
0.0838 890.2486 890.2486 0.0374 891.1848
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.8210 0.8210 0.7553 0.7553 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.8210 6.6205 2.9537 0.7553 3.7090 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage11of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.8210 0.8210 0.7553 0.7553 0.0000 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.8210 6.6205 2.9537 0.7553 3.7090 0.0000 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage12of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.6844 5.2009 2.4827 0.6296 3.1123 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage13of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.6844 5.2009 2.4827 0.6296 3.1123 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage14of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0155 0.4498 0.1139 1.1000e-
003
0.0271 2.2400e-
003
0.0293 7.8000e-
003
2.1400e-
003
9.9400e-
003
116.5196 116.5196 5.1100e-
003
116.6473
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 0.0434 0.4669 0.3340 1.7500e-
003
0.0928 2.6500e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5200e-
003
0.0278 181.0001 181.0001 6.6900e-
003
181.1673
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.6844 5.4724 2.5238 0.6296 3.1534 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage15of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.4644 85.3080 17.2727 0.2381 5.2430 0.2809 5.5239 1.4370 0.2688 1.7057 25,403.09
70
25,403.09
70
1.1306 25,431.36
21
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 2.4922 85.3251 17.4928 0.2387 5.3087 0.2813 5.5900 1.4544 0.2691 1.7235 25,467.57
76
25,467.57
76
1.1322 25,495.88
21
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.6844 5.4724 2.5238 0.6296 3.1534 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage16of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.4644 85.3080 17.2727 0.2381 5.2430 0.2809 5.5239 1.4370 0.2688 1.7057 25,403.09
70
25,403.09
70
1.1306 25,431.36
21
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0278 0.0171 0.2200 6.5000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 64.4805 64.4805 1.5800e-
003
64.5200
Total 2.4922 85.3251 17.4928 0.2387 5.3087 0.2813 5.5900 1.4544 0.2691 1.7235 25,467.57
76
25,467.57
76
1.1322 25,495.88
21
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage17of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1632 4.7231 1.1962 0.0116 0.2844 0.0235 0.3079 0.0819 0.0225 0.1044 1,223.455
3
1,223.455
3
0.0537 1,224.797
1
Worker 0.3684 0.2262 2.9154 8.5700e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 854.3668 854.3668 0.0209 854.8895
Total 0.5316 4.9494 4.1115 0.0202 1.1551 0.0290 1.1841 0.3128 0.0275 0.3403 2,077.822
1
2,077.822
1
0.0746 2,079.686
6
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage18of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1632 4.7231 1.1962 0.0116 0.2844 0.0235 0.3079 0.0819 0.0225 0.1044 1,223.455
3
1,223.455
3
0.0537 1,224.797
1
Worker 0.3684 0.2262 2.9154 8.5700e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 854.3668 854.3668 0.0209 854.8895
Total 0.5316 4.9494 4.1115 0.0202 1.1551 0.0290 1.1841 0.3128 0.0275 0.3403 2,077.822
1
2,077.822
1
0.0746 2,079.686
6
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage19of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1339 4.2697 1.0761 0.0115 0.2844 9.4400e-
003
0.2938 0.0819 9.0300e-
003
0.0909 1,212.200
9
1,212.200
9
0.0505 1,213.463
9
Worker 0.3413 0.2022 2.6712 8.2700e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 824.6915 824.6915 0.0187 825.1600
Total 0.4753 4.4719 3.7473 0.0197 1.1551 0.0147 1.1699 0.3128 0.0139 0.3267 2,036.892
4
2,036.892
4
0.0693 2,038.623
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage20of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1339 4.2697 1.0761 0.0115 0.2844 9.4400e-
003
0.2938 0.0819 9.0300e-
003
0.0909 1,212.200
9
1,212.200
9
0.0505 1,213.463
9
Worker 0.3413 0.2022 2.6712 8.2700e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 824.6915 824.6915 0.0187 825.1600
Total 0.4753 4.4719 3.7473 0.0197 1.1551 0.0147 1.1699 0.3128 0.0139 0.3267 2,036.892
4
2,036.892
4
0.0693 2,038.623
8
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage21of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1249 4.0389 1.0135 0.0114 0.2844 8.2000e-
003
0.2926 0.0819 7.8400e-
003
0.0897 1,200.687
6
1,200.687
6
0.0483 1,201.894
0
Worker 0.3181 0.1815 2.4615 7.9700e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 794.7040 794.7040 0.0168 795.1247
Total 0.4430 4.2204 3.4749 0.0193 1.1551 0.0134 1.1685 0.3128 0.0126 0.3254 1,995.391
7
1,995.391
7
0.0651 1,997.018
7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage22of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1249 4.0389 1.0135 0.0114 0.2844 8.2000e-
003
0.2926 0.0819 7.8400e-
003
0.0897 1,200.687
6
1,200.687
6
0.0483 1,201.894
0
Worker 0.3181 0.1815 2.4615 7.9700e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 794.7040 794.7040 0.0168 795.1247
Total 0.4430 4.2204 3.4749 0.0193 1.1551 0.0134 1.1685 0.3128 0.0126 0.3254 1,995.391
7
1,995.391
7
0.0651 1,997.018
7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage23of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Total 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage24of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Total 0.0390 0.0223 0.3019 9.8000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 97.4637 97.4637 2.0600e-
003
97.5153
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage25of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Total 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage26of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Implement Trip Reduction Program
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Total 0.0630 0.0360 0.4877 1.5800e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 157.4414 157.4414 3.3300e-
003
157.5247
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage27of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.3001 7.8751 22.1764 0.0752 6.6708 0.0609 6.7317 1.7806 0.0569 1.8375 7,588.458
1
7,588.458
1
0.2539 7,594.806
3
Unmitigated 2.3001 7.8751 22.1764 0.0752 6.6708 0.0609 6.7317 1.7806 0.0569 1.8375 7,588.458
1
7,588.458
1
0.2539 7,594.806
3
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,659.84 1,659.84 1659.84 3,153,581 3,153,581
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,659.84 1,659.84 1,659.84 3,153,581 3,153,581
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage28of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Hotel 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Parking Lot 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Quality Restaurant 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage29of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15660.2 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5899.24 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage30of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15.6602 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5.89924 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage31of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage32of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage33of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:35PMPage34of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Summer
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 95.92 1000sqft 0.01 95,923.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 12.86 1000sqft 0.30 0.00 0
Parking Lot 18.00 1000sqft 0.41 18,000.00 0
Hotel 156.00 Room 0.42 129,000.00 0
Quality Restaurant 10.36 1000sqft 0.24 10,358.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4
Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 58
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2022OperationalYear
CO2 Intensity
lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4Intensity
lb/MWhr)
0.006N2OIntensity
lb/MWhr)
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022
Santa Clara County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage1of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
Project Characteristics - See SWAPE comment about intensity factors.
Land Use - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about parking lot and hotel land use sizes.
Construction Phase - Consistent with IS's model.
Off-road Equipment - No change. See SWAPE comment about equipment unit amounts.
Trips and VMT - Consistent with IS's model.
Demolition -
Grading - Consistent with IS's model. See SWAPE comment about grading.
Vehicle Trips - Consistent with IS's model.
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - See SWAPE comment about water use rates and wastewater treatment system percentages.
Solid Waste - See SWAPE comment about solid waste generation rates.
Land Use Change -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment about construction mitigation measures.
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 350.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 5.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 11.25 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage2of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 72,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 95,920.00 95,923.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 12,860.00 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 226,512.00 129,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,360.00 10,358.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.20 0.01
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.20 0.42
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 64.00 79.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 10.64
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 10.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 10.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 3,957,216.12 11,103,300.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage3of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.3075 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 1.6574 16.3634 6.4861 1.5353 8.0214 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
2021 2.3181 18.1908 16.5975 0.0408 1.1551 0.6994 1.8545 0.3128 0.6750 0.9878 0.0000 3,940.210
2
3,940.210
2
0.4291 0.0000 3,950.937
8
2022 75.3144 16.7953 16.1502 0.0404 1.1551 0.6025 1.7577 0.3128 0.5817 0.8946 0.0000 3,901.599
8
3,901.599
8
0.4162 0.0000 3,912.003
6
Maximum 75.3144 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 1.6574 16.3634 6.4861 1.5353 8.0214 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 5.3075 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 1.6574 16.3634 6.4861 1.5353 8.0214 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
2021 2.3181 18.1908 16.5975 0.0408 1.1551 0.6994 1.8545 0.3128 0.6750 0.9878 0.0000 3,940.210
2
3,940.210
2
0.4291 0.0000 3,950.937
8
2022 75.3144 16.7953 16.1502 0.0404 1.1551 0.6025 1.7577 0.3128 0.5817 0.8946 0.0000 3,901.599
8
3,901.599
8
0.4162 0.0000 3,912.003
6
Maximum 75.3144 118.0569 32.0336 0.2645 14.7060 1.6574 16.3634 6.4861 1.5353 8.0214 0.0000 27,935.97
89
27,935.97
89
2.0757 0.0000 27,987.87
15
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage4of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage5of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 1.9741 8.2505 22.3856 0.0701 6.6708 0.0614 6.7322 1.7806 0.0573 1.8379 7,072.514
3
7,072.514
3
0.2591 7,078.992
1
Total 5.6432 10.3644 24.1911 0.0828 6.6708 0.2221 6.8929 1.7806 0.2181 1.9987 9,608.988
2
9,608.988
2
0.3079 0.0465 9,630.542
8
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Energy 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mobile 1.9741 8.2505 22.3856 0.0701 6.6708 0.0614 6.7322 1.7806 0.0573 1.8379 7,072.514
3
7,072.514
3
0.2591 7,078.992
1
Total 5.6432 10.3644 24.1911 0.0828 6.6708 0.2221 6.8929 1.7806 0.2181 1.9987 9,608.988
2
9,608.988
2
0.3079 0.0465 9,630.542
8
Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage6of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/3/2020 8/14/2020 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/17/2020 8/21/2020 5 5
3 Grading Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
4 Grading Soil Haul Grading 8/24/2020 10/2/2020 5 30
5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/5/2020 2/4/2022 5 350
6 Paving Paving 2/7/2022 2/18/2022 5 10
7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/21/2022 3/18/2022 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 209,037; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,679; Striped Parking Area: 6,835
Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 2.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.72
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage7of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Soil Haul Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41
Grading Soil Haul Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40
Grading Soil Haul Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage8of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 1.1525 2.5306 0.2087 1.0761 1.2848 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 4.00 79.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading 3 8.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Grading Soil Haul 3 8.00 0.00 9,000.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 7 106.00 42.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage9of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0667 2.3013 0.4895 6.1600e-
003
0.1381 7.5200e-
003
0.1456 0.0378 7.1900e-
003
0.0450 657.6093 657.6093 0.0312 658.3887
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0481 0.0339 0.3313 9.7000e-
004
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 96.2606 96.2606 2.3900e-
003
96.3203
Total 0.1311 2.7902 0.9506 8.2000e-
003
0.2719 0.0105 0.2824 0.0740 9.9800e-
003
0.0839 867.4316 867.4316 0.0391 868.4082
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.3781 0.0000 1.3781 0.2087 0.0000 0.2087 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.3781 1.1525 2.5306 0.2087 1.0761 1.2848 0.0000 2,322.312
7
2,322.312
7
0.5970 2,337.236
3
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage10of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.2 Demolition - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0667 2.3013 0.4895 6.1600e-
003
0.1381 7.5200e-
003
0.1456 0.0378 7.1900e-
003
0.0450 657.6093 657.6093 0.0312 658.3887
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0481 0.0339 0.3313 9.7000e-
004
0.1068 6.7000e-
004
0.1075 0.0283 6.1000e-
004
0.0289 96.2606 96.2606 2.3900e-
003
96.3203
Total 0.1311 2.7902 0.9506 8.2000e-
003
0.2719 0.0105 0.2824 0.0740 9.9800e-
003
0.0839 867.4316 867.4316 0.0391 868.4082
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.8210 0.8210 0.7553 0.7553 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.8210 6.6205 2.9537 0.7553 3.7090 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage11of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 0.8210 0.8210 0.7553 0.7553 0.0000 1,667.4119 1,667.4119 0.5393 1,680.893
7
Total 1.6299 18.3464 7.7093 0.0172 5.7996 0.8210 6.6205 2.9537 0.7553 3.7090 0.0000 1,667.411
9
1,667.411
9
0.5393 1,680.893
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage12of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.3 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.6844 5.2009 2.4827 0.6296 3.1123 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage13of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.5166 0.0000 4.5166 2.4827 0.0000 2.4827 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.5166 0.6844 5.2009 2.4827 0.6296 3.1123 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage14of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.4 Grading - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0164 0.4550 0.1298 1.0700e-
003
0.0271 2.2800e-
003
0.0294 7.8000e-
003
2.1800e-
003
9.9700e-
003
113.5616 113.5616 5.5100e-
003
113.6993
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 0.0459 0.4759 0.3337 1.6600e-
003
0.0928 2.6900e-
003
0.0955 0.0252 2.5600e-
003
0.0278 172.7989 172.7989 6.9800e-
003
172.9733
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.6844 5.4724 2.5238 0.6296 3.1534 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage15of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5324 87.3895 18.5875 0.2341 5.2430 0.2855 5.5285 1.4370 0.2731 1.7101 24,972.50
60
24,972.50
60
1.1839 25,002.10
25
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 2.5620 87.4103 18.7914 0.2347 5.3087 0.2859 5.5946 1.4544 0.2735 1.7279 25,031.74
33
25,031.74
33
1.1853 25,061.37
65
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.7880 0.0000 4.7880 2.5238 0.0000 2.5238 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 0.6844 0.6844 0.6296 0.6296 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Total 1.3498 15.0854 6.4543 0.0141 4.7880 0.6844 5.4724 2.5238 0.6296 3.1534 0.0000 1,365.718
3
1,365.718
3
0.4417 1,376.760
9
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage16of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.5 Grading Soil Haul - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 2.5324 87.3895 18.5875 0.2341 5.2430 0.2855 5.5285 1.4370 0.2731 1.7101 24,972.50
60
24,972.50
60
1.1839 25,002.10
25
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0296 0.0209 0.2039 5.9000e-
004
0.0657 4.1000e-
004
0.0661 0.0174 3.8000e-
004
0.0178 59.2373 59.2373 1.4700e-
003
59.2740
Total 2.5620 87.4103 18.7914 0.2347 5.3087 0.2859 5.5946 1.4544 0.2735 1.7279 25,031.74
33
25,031.74
33
1.1853 25,061.37
65
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage17of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1717 4.7777 1.3629 0.0113 0.2844 0.0239 0.3083 0.0819 0.0229 0.1047 1,192.397
2
1,192.397
2
0.0578 1,193.842
3
Worker 0.3919 0.2764 2.7014 7.8800e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 784.8941 784.8941 0.0195 785.3806
Total 0.5636 5.0540 4.0642 0.0192 1.1551 0.0293 1.1845 0.3128 0.0279 0.3407 1,977.291
3
1,977.291
3
0.0773 1,979.222
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Total 2.0305 14.7882 13.1881 0.0220 0.7960 0.7960 0.7688 0.7688 0.0000 2,001.159
5
2,001.159
5
0.3715 2,010.446
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage18of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1717 4.7777 1.3629 0.0113 0.2844 0.0239 0.3083 0.0819 0.0229 0.1047 1,192.397
2
1,192.397
2
0.0578 1,193.842
3
Worker 0.3919 0.2764 2.7014 7.8800e-
003
0.8708 5.4300e-
003
0.8762 0.2310 5.0000e-
003
0.2360 784.8941 784.8941 0.0195 785.3806
Total 0.5636 5.0540 4.0642 0.0192 1.1551 0.0293 1.1845 0.3128 0.0279 0.3407 1,977.291
3
1,977.291
3
0.0773 1,979.222
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage19of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1419 4.3078 1.2321 0.0112 0.2844 9.7500e-
003
0.2941 0.0819 9.3200e-
003
0.0912 1,181.336
0
1,181.336
0
0.0544 1,182.697
1
Worker 0.3637 0.2470 2.4660 7.6000e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 757.6542 757.6542 0.0174 758.0891
Total 0.5056 4.5547 3.6982 0.0188 1.1551 0.0150 1.1702 0.3128 0.0142 0.3270 1,938.990
2
1,938.990
2
0.0718 1,940.786
1
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Total 1.8125 13.6361 12.8994 0.0221 0.6843 0.6843 0.6608 0.6608 0.0000 2,001.220
0
2,001.220
0
0.3573 2,010.151
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage20of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1419 4.3078 1.2321 0.0112 0.2844 9.7500e-
003
0.2941 0.0819 9.3200e-
003
0.0912 1,181.336
0
1,181.336
0
0.0544 1,182.697
1
Worker 0.3637 0.2470 2.4660 7.6000e-
003
0.8708 5.2900e-
003
0.8761 0.2310 4.8700e-
003
0.2358 757.6542 757.6542 0.0174 758.0891
Total 0.5056 4.5547 3.6982 0.0188 1.1551 0.0150 1.1702 0.3128 0.0142 0.3270 1,938.990
2
1,938.990
2
0.0718 1,940.786
1
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage21of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1324 4.0707 1.1605 0.0111 0.2844 8.4800e-
003
0.2929 0.0819 8.1100e-
003
0.0900 1,169.918
4
1,169.918
4
0.0520 1,171.217
6
Worker 0.3399 0.2216 2.2633 7.3200e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 730.1386 730.1386 0.0156 730.5280
Total 0.4723 4.2922 3.4238 0.0184 1.1551 0.0137 1.1688 0.3128 0.0129 0.3257 1,900.056
9
1,900.056
9
0.0676 1,901.745
5
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 2,001.542
9
2,001.542
9
0.3486 2,010.258
1
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage22of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.1324 4.0707 1.1605 0.0111 0.2844 8.4800e-
003
0.2929 0.0819 8.1100e-
003
0.0900 1,169.918
4
1,169.918
4
0.0520 1,171.217
6
Worker 0.3399 0.2216 2.2633 7.3200e-
003
0.8708 5.1700e-
003
0.8759 0.2310 4.7600e-
003
0.2357 730.1386 730.1386 0.0156 730.5280
Total 0.4723 4.2922 3.4238 0.0184 1.1551 0.0137 1.1688 0.3128 0.0129 0.3257 1,900.056
9
1,900.056
9
0.0676 1,901.745
5
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage23of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Total 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6877 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7951 6.7738 8.8060 0.0135 0.3474 0.3474 0.3205 0.3205 0.0000 1,297.378
9
1,297.378
9
0.4113 1,307.660
8
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage24of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.7 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Total 0.0417 0.0272 0.2776 9.0000e-
004
0.1068 6.3000e-
004
0.1074 0.0283 5.8000e-
004
0.0289 89.5453 89.5453 1.9100e-
003
89.5931
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage25of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Total 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 75.0425 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Total 75.2470 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-
003
0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage26of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Implement Trip Reduction Program
3.8 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Total 0.0673 0.0439 0.4484 1.4500e-
003
0.1725 1.0200e-
003
0.1735 0.0458 9.4000e-
004
0.0467 144.6501 144.6501 3.0900e-
003
144.7272
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage27of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.9741 8.2505 22.3856 0.0701 6.6708 0.0614 6.7322 1.7806 0.0573 1.8379 7,072.514
3
7,072.514
3
0.2591 7,078.992
1
Unmitigated 1.9741 8.2505 22.3856 0.0701 6.6708 0.0614 6.7322 1.7806 0.0573 1.8379 7,072.514
3
7,072.514
3
0.2591 7,078.992
1
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 1,659.84 1,659.84 1659.84 3,153,581 3,153,581
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Restaurant 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,659.84 1,659.84 1,659.84 3,153,581 3,153,581
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Quality Restaurant 9.50 7.30 7.30 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage28of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Hotel 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Parking Lot 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Quality Restaurant 0.610498 0.036775 0.183084 0.106123 0.014413 0.005007 0.012610 0.021118 0.002144 0.001548 0.005312 0.000627 0.000740
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage29of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15660.2 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5899.24 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage30of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 15.6602 0.1689 1.5353 1.2897 9.2100e-
003
0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 0.1167 1,842.382
0
1,842.382
0
0.0353 0.0338 1,853.330
3
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
5.89924 0.0636 0.5784 0.4858 3.4700e-
003
0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 0.0440 694.0277 694.0277 0.0133 0.0127 698.1520
Total 0.2325 2.1137 1.7755 0.0127 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 0.1606 2,536.409
7
2,536.409
7
0.0486 0.0465 2,551.482
3
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage31of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage32of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
8.0 Waste Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.4112 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
3.0226 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7900e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Total 3.4366 2.7000e-
004
0.0300 0.0000 1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
0.0642 0.0642 1.7000e-
004
0.0684
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage33of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/16/2020 12:33PMPage34of34
De Anza Construction & Operation 2022 - Santa Clara County, Winter
AERSCREEN 16216 AERMOD 19191 01/16/20
13:43:40
TITLE:De Anza Construction
AREA PARAMETERS
SOURCE EMISSION RATE:0.112E 02 g/s 0.891E 02 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE:0.215E 06 g/(s m2)0.171E 05 lb/(hr m2)
AREA HEIGHT:3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE:95.00 meters 311.68 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE:55.00 meters 180.45 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION:1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN:URBAN
POPULATION:60777
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE 5000.meters 16404.feet
BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS
BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON POINT SOURCES
FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS
25 meter receptor spacing:1.meters 5000.meters
MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1 HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS ug/m3)deg)m)PERIOD
1*1.000 5.141 15 50.0 WIN
worst case diagonal
MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS
MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:250.0 310.0 K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED:0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT:AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE:Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:Winter
ALBEDO:0.35
BOWEN RATIO:1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH:1.000 meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY U*)NOT ADUSTED
METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT
YR MO DY JDY HR
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U*W*DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50
HT REF TA HT
10.0 310.0 2.0
AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES
OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1 HR CONC DIST 1 HR CONC
m)ug/m3)m)ug/m3)
1.00 3.727 2525.00 0.2584E 01
25.00 4.568 2550.00 0.2549E 01
50.00 5.141 2575.00 0.2516E 01
75.00 3.111 2600.00 0.2483E 01
100.00 2.086 2625.00 0.2450E 01
125.00 1.546 2650.00 0.2419E 01
150.00 1.209 2675.00 0.2388E 01
175.00 0.9812 2700.00 0.2358E 01
200.00 0.8187 2725.00 0.2328E 01
225.00 0.6976 2750.00 0.2299E 01
250.00 0.6050 2775.00 0.2271E 01
275.00 0.5312 2800.00 0.2243E 01
300.00 0.4719 2824.99 0.2216E 01
325.00 0.4233 2850.00 0.2189E 01
350.00 0.3827 2875.00 0.2163E 01
375.00 0.3484 2900.00 0.2138E 01
400.00 0.3191 2925.00 0.2113E 01
425.00 0.2939 2950.00 0.2088E 01
450.00 0.2717 2975.00 0.2064E 01
475.00 0.2524 3000.00 0.2041E 01
500.00 0.2353 3025.00 0.2018E 01
525.00 0.2202 3050.00 0.1995E 01
550.00 0.2067 3075.00 0.1973E 01
575.00 0.1946 3100.00 0.1951E 01
600.00 0.1836 3125.00 0.1930E 01
625.00 0.1737 3150.00 0.1909E 01
650.00 0.1646 3175.00 0.1889E 01
675.00 0.1563 3199.99 0.1868E 01
700.00 0.1487 3225.00 0.1849E 01
725.00 0.1417 3250.00 0.1829E 01
750.00 0.1353 3275.00 0.1810E 01
775.00 0.1294 3300.00 0.1791E 01
800.00 0.1239 3325.00 0.1773E 01
825.00 0.1188 3350.00 0.1755E 01
850.00 0.1141 3375.00 0.1737E 01
875.00 0.1097 3400.00 0.1720E 01
900.00 0.1055 3425.00 0.1703E 01
925.00 0.1017 3450.00 0.1686E 01
950.00 0.9806E 01 3475.00 0.1669E 01
975.00 0.9465E 01 3500.00 0.1653E 01
1000.00 0.9201E 01 3525.00 0.1637E 01
1025.00 0.8894E 01 3550.00 0.1621E 01
1050.00 0.8605E 01 3575.00 0.1606E 01
1075.00 0.8331E 01 3600.00 0.1590E 01
1100.00 0.8072E 01 3625.00 0.1575E 01
1125.00 0.7827E 01 3650.00 0.1561E 01
1150.00 0.7594E 01 3675.00 0.1546E 01
1175.00 0.7373E 01 3700.00 0.1532E 01
1200.00 0.7163E 01 3725.00 0.1518E 01
1225.00 0.6963E 01 3750.00 0.1504E 01
1250.00 0.6773E 01 3775.00 0.1490E 01
1275.00 0.6592E 01 3800.00 0.1477E 01
1300.00 0.6418E 01 3825.00 0.1464E 01
1325.00 0.6253E 01 3850.00 0.1451E 01
1350.00 0.6094E 01 3875.00 0.1438E 01
1375.00 0.5943E 01 3900.00 0.1425E 01
1400.00 0.5798E 01 3925.00 0.1413E 01
1425.00 0.5659E 01 3950.00 0.1401E 01
1450.00 0.5525E 01 3975.00 0.1389E 01
1475.00 0.5397E 01 4000.00 0.1377E 01
1500.00 0.5274E 01 4025.00 0.1365E 01
1525.00 0.5156E 01 4050.00 0.1354E 01
1550.00 0.5043E 01 4075.00 0.1342E 01
1574.99 0.4933E 01 4100.00 0.1331E 01
1600.00 0.4828E 01 4125.00 0.1320E 01
1625.00 0.4726E 01 4149.99 0.1309E 01
1650.00 0.4628E 01 4175.00 0.1298E 01
1675.00 0.4534E 01 4200.00 0.1288E 01
1700.00 0.4443E 01 4225.00 0.1278E 01
1725.00 0.4355E 01 4250.00 0.1267E 01
1750.00 0.4270E 01 4275.00 0.1257E 01
1775.00 0.4188E 01 4300.00 0.1247E 01
1800.00 0.4108E 01 4325.00 0.1237E 01
1824.99 0.4031E 01 4350.00 0.1228E 01
1850.00 0.3957E 01 4375.00 0.1218E 01
1875.00 0.3885E 01 4400.00 0.1209E 01
1900.00 0.3815E 01 4425.00 0.1199E 01
1924.99 0.3747E 01 4450.00 0.1190E 01
1950.00 0.3681E 01 4475.00 0.1181E 01
1975.00 0.3618E 01 4500.00 0.1172E 01
2000.00 0.3556E 01 4525.00 0.1163E 01
2025.00 0.3496E 01 4550.00 0.1154E 01
2050.00 0.3438E 01 4575.00 0.1146E 01
2075.00 0.3381E 01 4600.00 0.1137E 01
2100.00 0.3326E 01 4625.00 0.1129E 01
2125.00 0.3273E 01 4650.00 0.1121E 01
2150.00 0.3221E 01 4675.00 0.1112E 01
2175.00 0.3170E 01 4700.00 0.1104E 01
2200.00 0.3121E 01 4725.00 0.1096E 01
2224.99 0.3073E 01 4750.00 0.1088E 01
2250.00 0.3026E 01 4775.00 0.1081E 01
2275.00 0.2981E 01 4800.00 0.1073E 01
2300.00 0.2936E 01 4825.00 0.1065E 01
2325.00 0.2893E 01 4850.00 0.1058E 01
2350.00 0.2851E 01 4875.00 0.1050E 01
2375.00 0.2810E 01 4899.99 0.1043E 01
2399.99 0.2770E 01 4925.00 0.1036E 01
2425.00 0.2731E 01 4950.00 0.1029E 01
2449.99 0.2693E 01 4975.00 0.1022E 01
2475.00 0.2656E 01 5000.00 0.1015E 01
2500.00 0.2620E 01
AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY
3 hour,8 hour,and 24 hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1 hour concentration as referenced in
SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES,REVISED Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA 454/R 92 019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED
1 HOUR 3 HOUR 8 HOUR 24 HOUR ANNUAL
CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC
PROCEDURE (ug/m3)ug/m3)ug/m3)ug/m3)ug/m3)
FLAT TERRAIN 5.141 5.141 5.141 5.141 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 50.00 meters
IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 3.727 3.727 3.727 3.727 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date
H0 U*W*DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT
REF TA HT
0.37267E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45676E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51414E+01 50.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31110E+01 75.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20861E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15458E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12090E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.98121E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.81873E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69761E+00 225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60502E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53118E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47191E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42332E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38268E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34844E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31912E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29388E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27173E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25239E+00 475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23531E+00 500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22017E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20667E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19456E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18359E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17366E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16458E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15629E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14871E+00 700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14175E+00 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13535E+00 750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12942E+00 775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12393E+00 800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11883E+00 825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11409E+00 850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10967E+00 875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10555E+00 900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10168E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.98055E 01 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.94654E 01 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.92009E 01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.88941E 01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.86046E 01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.83310E 01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.80721E 01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.78269E 01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.75943E 01 1150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.73733E 01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.71634E 01 1200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.69635E 01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.67731E 01 1250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.65915E 01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64183E 01 1300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62527E 01 1325.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60944E 01 1350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.59429E 01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57979E 01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.56588E 01 1425.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55254E 01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53974E 01 1475.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52745E 01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51563E 01 1525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.50426E 01 1550.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49332E 01 1574.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48278E 01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47263E 01 1625.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46284E 01 1650.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45340E 01 1675.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44428E 01 1700.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43548E 01 1725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42698E 01 1750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41876E 01 1775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41081E 01 1800.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40312E 01 1824.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39567E 01 1850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38846E 01 1875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38148E 01 1900.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37470E 01 1924.99 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36814E 01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36177E 01 1975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35559E 01 2000.00 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34959E 01 2025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34376E 01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33810E 01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33260E 01 2100.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32725E 01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32205E 01 2150.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31699E 01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31207E 01 2200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30728E 01 2224.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30261E 01 2250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29806E 01 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29364E 01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28932E 01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28511E 01 2350.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28101E 01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27701E 01 2399.99 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27311E 01 2425.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26930E 01 2449.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26558E 01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26195E 01 2500.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25841E 01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25495E 01 2550.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25156E 01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24826E 01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24503E 01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24187E 01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23878E 01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23576E 01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23280E 01 2725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22991E 01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22708E 01 2775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22431E 01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22160E 01 2824.99 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21894E 01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21634E 01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21379E 01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21129E 01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20885E 01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20645E 01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20410E 01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20179E 01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19953E 01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19731E 01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19514E 01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19300E 01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19091E 01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18886E 01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18684E 01 3199.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18486E 01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18292E 01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18101E 01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17914E 01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17730E 01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17549E 01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17371E 01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17197E 01 3400.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17025E 01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16857E 01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16691E 01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16528E 01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16368E 01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16210E 01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16055E 01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15903E 01 3600.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15753E 01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15606E 01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15461E 01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15318E 01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15177E 01 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15039E 01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14903E 01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14769E 01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14637E 01 3825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14507E 01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14379E 01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14253E 01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14129E 01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14007E 01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13887E 01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13768E 01 4000.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13651E 01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13536E 01 4050.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13423E 01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13311E 01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13201E 01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13092E 01 4149.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12985E 01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12879E 01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12775E 01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12672E 01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12571E 01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12471E 01 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12373E 01 4325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12276E 01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12180E 01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12085E 01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11992E 01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11900E 01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11809E 01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11719E 01 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11631E 01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11544E 01 4550.00 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11457E 01 4575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11372E 01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11288E 01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11205E 01 4650.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11123E 01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11043E 01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10963E 01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10884E 01 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10806E 01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10729E 01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10653E 01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10578E 01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10504E 01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10431E 01 4899.99 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10359E 01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10287E 01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10216E 01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10147E 01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
AERSCREEN 16216 AERMOD 19191 01/16/20
13:45:29
TITLE:De Anza Operation
AREA PARAMETERS
SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.116E 02 g/s 0.922E 02 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE:0.222E 06 g/(s m2) 0.177E 05 lb/(hr m2)
AREA HEIGHT:3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE:95.00 meters 311.68 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE:55.00 meters 180.45 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN:URBAN
POPULATION:60777
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE 5000.meters 16404.feet
BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS
BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON POINT SOURCES
FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS
25 meter receptor spacing:1.meters 5000.meters
MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE 1 HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL
SECTOR ROUGHNESS ug/m3)deg)m)PERIOD
1*1.000 5.321 15 50.0 WIN
worst case diagonal
MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS
MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:250.0 310.0 K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT:AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE:Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:Winter
ALBEDO:0.35
BOWEN RATIO:1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY U*)NOT ADUSTED
METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT
YR MO DY JDY HR
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U*W*DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50
HT REF TA HT
10.0 310.0 2.0
AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES
OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1 HR CONC DIST 1 HR CONC
m) (ug/m3)(m) (ug/m3)
1.00 3.857 2525.00 0.2674E 01
25.00 4.727 2550.00 0.2638E 01
50.00 5.321 2575.00 0.2603E 01
75.00 3.220 2600.00 0.2569E 01
100.00 2.159 2625.00 0.2536E 01
125.00 1.600 2650.00 0.2503E 01
150.00 1.251 2675.00 0.2471E 01
175.00 1.015 2700.00 0.2440E 01
200.00 0.8473 2725.00 0.2409E 01
225.00 0.7220 2750.00 0.2379E 01
250.00 0.6261 2775.00 0.2350E 01
275.00 0.5497 2800.00 0.2321E 01
300.00 0.4884 2825.00 0.2293E 01
325.00 0.4381 2850.00 0.2266E 01
350.00 0.3960 2875.00 0.2239E 01
375.00 0.3606 2900.00 0.2213E 01
400.00 0.3303 2925.00 0.2187E 01
425.00 0.3041 2950.00 0.2161E 01
450.00 0.2812 2975.00 0.2137E 01
475.00 0.2612 3000.00 0.2112E 01
500.00 0.2435 3025.00 0.2088E 01
525.00 0.2279 3050.00 0.2065E 01
550.00 0.2139 3075.00 0.2042E 01
575.00 0.2013 3100.00 0.2019E 01
600.00 0.1900 3125.00 0.1997E 01
625.00 0.1797 3150.00 0.1976E 01
650.00 0.1703 3175.00 0.1954E 01
675.00 0.1617 3200.00 0.1934E 01
700.00 0.1539 3225.00 0.1913E 01
725.00 0.1467 3250.00 0.1893E 01
750.00 0.1401 3275.00 0.1873E 01
775.00 0.1339 3300.00 0.1854E 01
800.00 0.1283 3325.00 0.1835E 01
825.00 0.1230 3350.00 0.1816E 01
850.00 0.1181 3375.00 0.1798E 01
875.00 0.1135 3400.00 0.1780E 01
900.00 0.1092 3425.00 0.1762E 01
925.00 0.1052 3450.00 0.1744E 01
950.00 0.1015 3475.00 0.1727E 01
975.00 0.9796E 01 3500.00 0.1710E 01
1000.00 0.9522E 01 3525.00 0.1694E 01
1025.00 0.9205E 01 3550.00 0.1678E 01
1050.00 0.8905E 01 3575.00 0.1662E 01
1075.00 0.8622E 01 3600.00 0.1646E 01
1100.00 0.8354E 01 3625.00 0.1630E 01
1125.00 0.8100E 01 3650.00 0.1615E 01
1150.00 0.7859E 01 3675.00 0.1600E 01
1175.00 0.7631E 01 3700.00 0.1585E 01
1200.00 0.7413E 01 3724.99 0.1571E 01
1225.00 0.7207E 01 3750.00 0.1556E 01
1250.00 0.7009E 01 3775.00 0.1542E 01
1275.00 0.6822E 01 3800.00 0.1528E 01
1300.00 0.6642E 01 3825.00 0.1515E 01
1325.00 0.6471E 01 3850.00 0.1501E 01
1350.00 0.6307E 01 3875.00 0.1488E 01
1375.00 0.6150E 01 3900.00 0.1475E 01
1400.00 0.6000E 01 3925.00 0.1462E 01
1425.00 0.5856E 01 3950.00 0.1450E 01
1450.00 0.5718E 01 3975.00 0.1437E 01
1475.00 0.5586E 01 4000.00 0.1425E 01
1500.00 0.5459E 01 4025.00 0.1413E 01
1525.00 0.5336E 01 4050.00 0.1401E 01
1550.00 0.5219E 01 4075.00 0.1389E 01
1574.99 0.5105E 01 4100.00 0.1378E 01
1600.00 0.4996E 01 4125.00 0.1366E 01
1625.00 0.4891E 01 4150.00 0.1355E 01
1650.00 0.4790E 01 4175.00 0.1344E 01
1675.00 0.4692E 01 4200.00 0.1333E 01
1700.00 0.4598E 01 4225.00 0.1322E 01
1725.00 0.4507E 01 4250.00 0.1311E 01
1750.00 0.4419E 01 4275.00 0.1301E 01
1775.00 0.4334E 01 4300.00 0.1291E 01
1800.00 0.4251E 01 4325.00 0.1280E 01
1824.99 0.4172E 01 4350.00 0.1270E 01
1850.00 0.4095E 01 4375.00 0.1260E 01
1875.00 0.4020E 01 4400.00 0.1251E 01
1899.99 0.3948E 01 4425.00 0.1241E 01
1924.99 0.3878E 01 4450.00 0.1232E 01
1950.00 0.3810E 01 4475.00 0.1222E 01
1975.00 0.3744E 01 4500.00 0.1213E 01
2000.00 0.3680E 01 4525.00 0.1204E 01
2025.00 0.3618E 01 4550.00 0.1195E 01
2050.00 0.3558E 01 4575.00 0.1186E 01
2075.00 0.3499E 01 4600.00 0.1177E 01
2100.00 0.3442E 01 4625.00 0.1168E 01
2125.00 0.3387E 01 4650.00 0.1160E 01
2150.00 0.3333E 01 4675.00 0.1151E 01
2175.00 0.3281E 01 4700.00 0.1143E 01
2200.00 0.3230E 01 4725.00 0.1135E 01
2224.99 0.3180E 01 4750.00 0.1126E 01
2250.00 0.3132E 01 4775.00 0.1118E 01
2275.00 0.3085E 01 4800.00 0.1110E 01
2300.00 0.3039E 01 4825.00 0.1103E 01
2325.00 0.2994E 01 4850.00 0.1095E 01
2350.00 0.2951E 01 4875.00 0.1087E 01
2375.00 0.2908E 01 4900.00 0.1079E 01
2399.99 0.2867E 01 4925.00 0.1072E 01
2425.00 0.2826E 01 4950.00 0.1065E 01
2449.99 0.2787E 01 4975.00 0.1057E 01
2475.00 0.2749E 01 5000.00 0.1050E 01
2500.00 0.2711E 01
AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY
3 hour,8 hour,and 24 hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1 hour concentration as referenced in
SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES,REVISED Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA 454/R 92 019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED
1 HOUR 3 HOUR 8 HOUR 24 HOUR ANNUAL
CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC
PROCEDURE ug/m3)ug/m3)ug/m3)ug/m3)ug/m3)
FLAT TERRAIN 5.321 5.321 5.321 5.321 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 50.00 meters
IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 3.857 3.857 3.857 3.857 N/A
DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date
H0 U*W*DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT
REF TA HT
0.38567E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47270E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53208E+01 50.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32196E+01 75.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21589E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15998E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12512E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10155E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.84730E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72196E+00 225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.62614E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54972E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48838E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43810E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39604E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36061E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33026E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30414E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28122E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26120E+00 475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24352E+00 500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22785E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21389E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20135E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19000E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17972E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17032E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16174E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15390E+00 700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14669E+00 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14007E+00 750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13394E+00 775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12825E+00 800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12297E+00 825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11807E+00 850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11350E+00 875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10923E+00 900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10522E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10148E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.97957E 01 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.95220E 01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.92045E 01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.89049E 01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.86217E 01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.83538E 01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.81000E 01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.78593E 01 1150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.76307E 01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.74134E 01 1200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.72065E 01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.70095E 01 1250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.68216E 01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.66422E 01 1300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.64709E 01 1325.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.63071E 01 1350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.61503E 01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.60002E 01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.58563E 01 1425.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.57183E 01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.55858E 01 1475.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.54585E 01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.53362E 01 1525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.52186E 01 1550.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.51054E 01 1574.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.49963E 01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.48912E 01 1625.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.47899E 01 1650.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.46922E 01 1675.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45979E 01 1700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.45068E 01 1725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.44188E 01 1750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.43337E 01 1775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.42515E 01 1800.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.41719E 01 1824.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40948E 01 1850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.40202E 01 1875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.39479E 01 1899.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38778E 01 1924.99 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.38098E 01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.37439E 01 1975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36800E 01 2000.00 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.36179E 01 2025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.35576E 01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34990E 01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.34421E 01 2100.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33867E 01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.33329E 01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32805E 01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.32296E 01 2200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31800E 01 2224.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.31317E 01 2250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30847E 01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.30388E 01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29942E 01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29507E 01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.29082E 01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28668E 01 2399.99 0.00 35.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.28264E 01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27870E 01 2449.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27485E 01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.27110E 01 2500.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26743E 01 2525.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26385E 01 2550.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.26034E 01 2575.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25692E 01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25358E 01 2625.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.25031E 01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24711E 01 2675.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24399E 01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.24093E 01 2725.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23793E 01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23500E 01 2775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.23214E 01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22933E 01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22658E 01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22389E 01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.22125E 01 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21867E 01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21613E 01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21365E 01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.21122E 01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20883E 01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20649E 01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20420E 01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.20195E 01 3100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19974E 01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19757E 01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19545E 01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19336E 01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.19131E 01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18930E 01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18733E 01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18539E 01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18348E 01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.18161E 01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17977E 01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17797E 01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17619E 01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17445E 01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17273E 01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.17105E 01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16939E 01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16776E 01 3550.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16616E 01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16458E 01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16303E 01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16150E 01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.16000E 01 3675.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15852E 01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15707E 01 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15564E 01 3750.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15423E 01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15284E 01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15148E 01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.15014E 01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14881E 01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14751E 01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14622E 01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14496E 01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14371E 01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14249E 01 4000.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14128E 01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.14009E 01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13891E 01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13775E 01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13661E 01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13549E 01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13438E 01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13329E 01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13221E 01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13115E 01 4250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.13010E 01 4275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12907E 01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12805E 01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12704E 01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12605E 01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12507E 01 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12410E 01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12315E 01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12221E 01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12128E 01 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.12037E 01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11946E 01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11857E 01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11769E 01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11682E 01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11596E 01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11512E 01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11428E 01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11345E 01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11264E 01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11183E 01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11104E 01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.11025E 01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10947E 01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10871E 01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10795E 01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10720E 01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10646E 01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10573E 01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
0.10501E 01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0 360 10011001
1.30 0.043 9.000 0.020 999.21.6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0
310.0 2.0
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887 9013
Email: mhagemann@swape.com
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
Professional Certifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:
Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine
years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science
Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from
perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of
the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement
actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working
with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.
Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the
application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt
has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of
Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.
Positions Matt has held include:
Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present);
Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2014;
Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 2003);
Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004);
Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989–
1998);
Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000);
Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 –
1998);
Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995);
Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports
since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water
resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic
hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the
local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and
implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins
and Valley Fever.
Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities.
Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former
Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns.
Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications
for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission.
Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S.
Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in
Southern California drinking water wells.
Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the
review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas
stations throughout California.
Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation.
Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school.
Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony
by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel.
Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology
of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking
water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony
against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies.
Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by
MTBE in California and New York.
2
Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production related contamination in Mississippi.
Lead author for a multi volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los
Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines.
3
Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with
clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange
County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of
wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange
County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection
of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the
development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the
discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including
Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business
institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to
characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point
Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army
Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of
monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and
groundwater.
Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory
analysis at military bases.
Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation
development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of
groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to
show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and
County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the
Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included
the following:
Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for
the protection of drinking water.
Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities
through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports,
conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very
concerned about the impact of designation.
4
Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments,
including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water
transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance
with Subtitle C requirements.
Reviewed and wrote part B permits for the disposal of hazardous waste.
Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed
the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service wide investigations of contaminant sources to
prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the
Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants.
Conducted watershed scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and
Olympic National Park.
Identified high levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico
and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA.
Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a
national workgroup.
Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while
serving on a national workgroup.
Co authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal
watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation
wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks.
Contributed to the Federal Multi Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water
Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the
potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking
water supplies.
Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing
to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in
Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
Improved the technical training of EPAs scientific and engineering staff.Earned
an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations
with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles
into the policy making process.Established
national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.5
Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for
timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical
models to determine slope stability.
Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource
protection.
Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the
city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later
listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern
Oregon. Duties included the following:
Supervised year long effort for soil and groundwater sampling.
Conducted aquifer tests.
Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university
levels:
At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in
environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater
contamination.
Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students.
Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in
Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public
Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and
Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las
Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at
schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE
Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater
Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust,
Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water
in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy
of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a
meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water
Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited
presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of
the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a
meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address
Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental
Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater
and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage
Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and
State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished
report.
7
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage
Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related
to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft
Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright
Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund
Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air
Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic
Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui,
October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu,
Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air
and Waste Management Association Publication VIP 61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases
in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater
Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of
Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL
contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
8
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of
Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009
2011.
9
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: prosenfeld@swape.com
October 2015 1 Rosenfeld CV
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling
Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education:
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on VOC filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience:
Dr. Rosenfeld is the Co-Founder and Principal Environmental Chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise
SWAPE). His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, risk assessment, and ecological
restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling, oil spills, boilers,
incinerators and other industrial and agricultural sources relating to nuisance and personal injury. His project
experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites
containing petroleum, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, PCBs, PAHs, dioxins, furans, volatile
organics, semi-volatile organics, perchlorate, heavy metals, asbestos, PFOA, unusual polymers, MtBE, fuel
oxygenates and odor. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using various modeling programs
recommended by California Air Quality Management Districts.
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner
UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher)
UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor
UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator
UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate
Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist
National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor
Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager
Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager
Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor
King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist
Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist
Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist
Bureau of Land Management, Kremmling Colorado 1990; Scientist
October 2015 2 Rosenfeld CV
Publications:
Chen, J. A., Zapata, A R., Sutherland, A. J., Molmen, D. R,. Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C.,
2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated
Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and
Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and
Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal
of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best
Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living
near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air
Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid
Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two
Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins
And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527-
000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near
a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for
Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater,
Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food,
Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing,
Rosenfeld P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). Anatomy of an Odor Wheel. Water Science and Technology.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J.J.J., Hensley A.R., Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). The use of an odor wheel classification for
evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities. Water Science And Technology.
October 2015 3 Rosenfeld CV
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science
and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme
For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC)
2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities,
and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science
and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from
Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using
High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management
Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water
Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal
of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor
emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and
Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and
distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users
Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids
Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters
thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third
World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
October 2015 4 Rosenfeld CV
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile
organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American
Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.;
Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse,
R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis,
Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS)
Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United
States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted
from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United
States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the
United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture
conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in
populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air
Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and
Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing
Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from
University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A
Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst
MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment
Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted
from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3-
Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture
conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala,
Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And
Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on
Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia
Hotel in Oslo Norway.
October 2015 5 Rosenfeld CV
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And
Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting &
Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel,
Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human
Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton
Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA
Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater
Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from
Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related
Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human
Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and
Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability
and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental
Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento,
California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh
International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical
Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus
Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California
CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA
Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
October 2015 6 Rosenfeld CV
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and
Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water
Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture
conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a
Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from
Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water
Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted
from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery
Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur
Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th
Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue
Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil
Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from
Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from
Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur
Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th
Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue
Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three
Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim
California.
October 2015 7 Rosenfeld CV
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science
100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on
the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New
Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage
tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1,
2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San
Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation
Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry,
Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of
Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on
VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of
polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered
Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the
Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts
in West Indies. 1993.
October 2015 8 Rosenfeld CV
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda
Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants
Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September, 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants
Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants
Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants
Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico
Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward
DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant
Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida
Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma
Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City
Landfill, et al. Defendants.
Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
October 2015 9 Rosenfeld CV
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants
Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Carolina, County of Aiken
David Anderson, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Case Number: 2007-CP-02-1584
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants
Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides, State of Louisiana
Roger Price, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Roy O. Martin, L.P., et al., Defendants.
Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division
Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Carolyn Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Chevron Oil Company, et al., Defendants.
Case Number 1:05 CV 227
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2008
In the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana
Craig Steven Arabie, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Case Number 07-2738 G
In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana
Leon B. Brydels, Plaintiffs, vs. Conoco, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Case Number 2004-6941 Division A
In the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 153rd Judicial District
Linda Faust, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Witco Chemical Corporation
A/K/A Witco Corporation, Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. and Koppers Industries, Inc., Defendants.
Case Number 153-212928-05
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2006, October 2007
Rosenfeld Trial: January 2008
In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino
Leroy Allen, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Nutro Products, Inc., a California Corporation and DOES 1 to 100,
inclusive, Defendants.
John Loney, Plaintiff, vs. James H. Didion, Sr.; Nutro Products, Inc.; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case Number VCVVS044671
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2009
Rosenfeld Trial: March 2010
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division
James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.
Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
October 2015 10 Rosenfeld CV
In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles
Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley, Plaintiffs, vs. Peter T. Hoss, as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust;
Plains Exploration & Production Company, a Delaware corporation; Rayne Water Conditioning, Inc., a
California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.
Case Number SC094173
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008, October 2008
In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch
Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm, et al., all individually, Plaintiffs, vs. Unocal Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation; Union Oil Company of California, a California corporation; Chevron Corporation, a
California corporation; ConocoPhillips, a Texas corporation; Kerr-McGee Corporation, an Oklahoma
corporation; and DOES 1 though 100, Defendants.
Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299)
Rosenfeld Deposition: January 2008
In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas, Eastern District of Arkansas
Harry Stephens Farms, Inc, and Harry Stephens, individual and as managing partner of Stephens
Partnership, Plaintiffs, vs. Helena Chemical Company, and Exxon Mobil Corp., successor to Mobil
Chemical Co., Defendants.
Case Number 2:06-CV-00166 JMM (Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM)
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010
In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division
Rhonda Brasel, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.
Civil Action Number 07-4037
Rosenfeld Deposition: March 2010
Rosenfeld Trial: October 2010
In the District Court of Texas 21st Judicial District of Burleson County
Dennis Davis, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Defendant.
Case Number 25,151
Rosenfeld Trial: May 2009
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division
Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and
on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.
Case 3:10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants
Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
Exhibit C
15 January 2020
Michael Lozeau, Esq.
Lozeau Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
Subject: The De Anza Hotel Project Public Review Draft Initial Study
Review and Comment on Noise Analysis
Dear Mr. Lozeau,
Per your request, Wilson Ihrig has reviewed The De Anza Hotel Project Public Review Draft Initial
Study (“DIS”, July 2, 2019). In this letter, we offer comments on the noise analysis and proposed
mitigation measures.
Comments on Construction Noise Analysis
The pertinent Cupertino Municipal Code for the control of construction noise is § 10.48.053 –
Grading, Construction and Demolition. The DIS summarizes the quantitative requirements of this
code as:
construction activities [may] not exceed 80 dBA at the nearest affected property or
individual equipment items do not exceed 87 dBA at 25 feet. Only one of these two criteria
must be met.” [DIS at p 4-59]
Of the two options, the DIS utilizes the first one and presents esti mates of construction noise at the
two nearest property lines shared with noise-sensitive receptors (an apartment complex and a
hotel). However, the DIS treats the 80 dBA limit as a limit for the average noise level (technically
denoted “Leq”). There is no indication in § 10.48.053 that that is the intent of the code. Rather, given
that people are more likely to complain about short-duration, high noise levels than the long-term
average noise level and that most noise ordinances specify maximum allowable noise levels, it is
more likely that the 80 dBA limit is intended to be a maximum for noise levels from the construction
activities.1 To that point, § 10.48.053 specifically exempts construction noise from § 10.48.040 which
1 The “maximum” noise level is typically the highest reading from a sound level meter using the “slow”
meter response.
The De Anza Hotel Project
Review and Comment on Noise Analysis
2
specifies the maximum allowable noise levels from non-construction activities at residential and non-
residential properties.
The DIS utilizes the Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model, and data
output from the model are provided in Appendix C of the DIS. In particular, these sheets sho w the
maximum (Lmax) noise levels for the various construction phases at a distance of 200 ft. However, the
construction equipment will be closer than this to the Cupertino Hotel property line.2 Using the
attenuation with distance factor used by the DIS and the closest approach point to the Cupertino
Hotel property line, the maximum noise levels on the Cupertino Hotel property may be easily
calculated.3 These are shown in Table I. Also shown is the distance the loudest piece of equipment
in each phase will need to be from the property to produce a maximum noise level of 80 dBA. For the
demolition and grading phases, the distance is nearly half the width of the project site indicating that
the 80 dBA limit will be exceeded half of the time during these phases.
TABLE I Maximum Construction Noise Levels
Construction Phase Lmax Distance to 80 dBA Lmax
Demolition 93 dBA 150 ft
Site Preparation 88 dBA 89 ft
Grading 93 dBA 150 ft
Building Construction 87 dBA 80 ft
Paving 87 dBA 80 ft
In conclusion on this point, we believe the DIS misinterprets the intent of the construction noise
limits provided in § 10.48.053 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. If the limits are interpreted as we
believe they should be – as maximum, not average, noise levels – then construction noise levels
during the five stages shown in Table I would create a significant noise impact at the Cupertino Hotel.
2 The DIS uses the center of the project site for the purpose of calculating the average noise level. This
is reasonable because the equipment will, in the long-term, move all around the site and will, on
average, be in the center. This is not appropriate for determining the maximum sound level, however,
because this will clearly occur when the equipment is at its closest approach point. Note that the
maximum noise level is determined by the single loudest piece of equipment in each phase, not a
summation of the noise levels from all equipment as is appropriate and as was done for the average
noise level calculations.
3 The attenuation rate is 6 dB per doubling of distance [DIS at p 4-59], and the closest distance is 34 feet
across driveway) [DIS at p 3-1].
The De Anza Hotel Project
Review and Comment on Noise Analysis
3
Comments on Mitigation Measure NOISE-2
Mitigation Measure NOISE-2 pertains to the operational noise from mechanical equipment once the
project is put into service.
The DIS notes that the emergency generator will have to be run for routine testing up to 50 hours per
year. [DIS at p 4-62] The DIS goes on to provide noise estimates both with and without sound
attenuation at the nearest receptors to the west (commercial) and to the east (apartment buildings).4
In both instances, the DIS concludes that the noise levels at both the commercial buildings and the
apartment buildings could exceed the applicable criterion, and states, “Therefore, this impact would
be potentially significant.” [DIS at p4-63] The DIS then goes on to say, “With implementation of
Mitigation Measure NOISE-2, project-related operational noise impacts would be less than
significant.” [DIS at p 4-63; no emphasis added].
A review of Mitigation Measure NOISE-2 indicates that it does not, in fact, provide a substantive
analysis that feasible mitigation is possible. Rather, it simply states that, in the future, a qualified
acoustician will “determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply
with the City’s noise level requirements.” [DIS at p 4-63] In other words, the mitigation measure is
simply to assert that the equipment will be selected and designed to meet the adopted threshold of
significance rather than provide a substantive description and analysis of what would need to be
done to accomplish this.
To add an element of reality to this point, Wilson Ihrig was recently asked to review a situation in
which an EIR asserted that an emergency generator would be selected and designed to meet that
projects threshold of significance, exactly as is being done here. However, when the project
developers set out to meet this requirement, they found that, due to the proximity of the generator
to noise-sensitive receptors, the mitigation measures could cost up to $200,000, an amount they were
not prepared to spend. As noted previously, the De Anza DIS estimates noise levels from the
generator including “a Level II sound enclosure” and still finds that the noise levels exceeded the
adopted criteria. [DIS at p 4-63]. If anything, this provides more impetus for additional analysis to
demonstrate that feasible mitigation is possible or to determine that the impact is significant.
Comments on Traffic Noise Analysis
The traffic noise analysis utilizes a relative, “audible” threshold of significance, stating, “Only ‘audible’
changes in noise levels at sensitive receptor locations (i.e., 3 dB or more) are considered potentially
significant.” [DIS at p 4-58]
The fundamental problem with using a relative threshold of significance, e.g., a change of 3 dBA or
greater, is that, over time, there will effectively be no limit. If the noise level today is 65 .0 dBA and
an increase to 67.9 dBA is found to be a less than significant impact, then the next project will take
4 As an aside, the emergency generator noise does not seem to have been assessed at the Cupertino
Hotel.
The De Anza Hotel Project
Review and Comment on Noise Analysis
4
67.9 dBA as the baseline, and an increase to 70.8 dBA will be found to be a less than significant impact.
The total increase would be 5.8 dBA, which would be deemed a significant impact if brought about
by either project individually, but would not be in the two-project scenario because the baseline for
the second project will be the noise level resulting from the first project. At each step, the noise level
increase would be characterized as “inaudible”, although the net increase would be characterized as
audible”.
While it is appropriate to use relative impact criteria, in order to keep noise levels from increasing
continually without limit over time, absolute criteria should be utilized, as well. For this project, an
appropriate source for absolute criteria is the Cupertino General Plan – Community Vision 2015 –
2040. Chapter 7, Health and Safety Element, contains Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise
Environments, cast in terms of either the Day-Night Equivalent Level (Ldn) or the Community Noise
Equivalent Level (CNEL), both 24-hour weighted average noise levels. [General Plan, Figure HS-8].
For various types of land uses, Figure HS-8 indicates if a particular noise exposure is “normally
acceptable”, “conditionally acceptable”, “normally unacceptable”, or “clearly unacceptable”.
A very reasonable, absolute threshold of significance would be if the noise level changed from on
classification to another, regardless of the amount of the increase. For example, Residential – Multi-
Family land use is normally acceptable up to CNEL 65 and conditionally acceptable up to CNEL 70. If
the existing noise environment at, for example, the Aviare apartment complex is CNEL 69, and the
project causes it to increase to CNEL 71 – thereby transforming the area from one that is conditionally
acceptable for the use to one that is normally unacceptable – that should be determined to be a
significant noise impact even though the increase is only 2 dBA and characterized as “inaudible”.
Finally on this point, the above analysis would necessarily be based on measurements of the existing
noise environment around the project site, something the DIS did not do. As such, even though the
DIS states that the traffic noise increase due to the project will be up to 2.0 dBA, it is not possible to
ascertain whether or not that increase will cause any of the noise-sensitive receptors to transition
from one land use classification to another, lower quality one.
Please contact us if you have any questions about our comments on the De Anza Hotel Project Draft
Initial Study noise analysis.
Very truly yours,
WILSON IHRIG
Derek L. Watry
Principal
2020-01-15 deanza-hotel ismnd noise rvw wilson-ihrig.docx
Wilson Ihrig – Derek Watry Resume – Page 1
DEREK WATRY
Principal
Mr. Watry is experienced in all aspects of environmental noise issues, having conducted extensive
field measurements, prepared EIR/EIS sections, helped resolve complex community noise issue,
established acceptability criteria, and studied meteorological effects on sound transmission.
He is well versed in the requirements of CEQA and NEPA. His experience includes responding to
community noise complaints that can be miles from transit noise, construction noise, and low-
frequency music noise. He has made numerous presentations at public meetings, conducted
technical seminars on outdoor noise propagation, and served as the acoustical expert for several
legal actions. These experiences have given him a thorough understanding of the technical, public
relations, and political aspects of environmental noise and vibration compliance work.
Education
M.B.A., Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, California
M.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley
B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California at San Diego
Relevant Project Experience
San Francisco Department of Public Works, Environmental Services On-Call
Several task orders with prime consultant. Recent projects have been the Northshore Main
Improvement Project, design noise mitigation for a recently constructed SOMA West Skate Park,
and a variety of other construction noise and vibration monitoring tasks.
City of Fremont Environmental Services On Call (Since 2004)
Providing oversight of and acoustical analysis for a variety of task orders. Work tasks primarily
focus on noise insulation and vibration control design compliance for new residential projects and
peer review other consultant’s projects.
King City Silva Ranch Annexation EIR
Conducted the noise portion of the EIR and assessed the suitability of the project areas for the intended
development. Work included a reconnaissance of existing noise sources and receptors in and around
the project areas, and long-term noise measurements at key locations.
Loch Lomond Marina EIR, San Rafael
Examined traffic noise impacts on existing residences. Provided the project with acoustical analyses
and reports to satisfy the requirements of Title 24.
Mare Island Dredge and Material Disposal, Vallejo
EIR/EIS analysis of noise from planned dredged material off-loading operations.
San Francisco Clean Water Program – Richmond Transport Tunnel
Environmental compliance monitoring of vibration during soft tunnel mining and boring, cut-and-
cover trenching for sewer lines, hard rock tunnel blasting and site remediation. Work involved
long-term monitoring of general construction activity, special investigations of groundborne
vibration from pumps and bus generated ground vibration, and interaction with the public
homeowners). Construction methods monitored included tunneling, pile driving, heavy equipment
operation, and rock blasting.
Wilson Ihrig – Derek Watry Resume – Page 2
San Francisco Department of Public Works, 525 Golden Gate Avenue Demolition
Noise and vibration monitoring and consultation during demolition of a multi-story office building
next to Federal, State, and Municipal Court buildings.
San Francisco Department of Public Works, 9-1-1 Emergency Communications Center
Technical assistance on issues relating to the demolition and construction work including vibration
monitoring, developing specification and reviewing/recommending appropriate methods and
equipment for demolition of Old Emergency Center.
Patterson Ranch EIR, Fremont
Conducted noise and vibration portion of the EIR.
Tyco Electronics Annual Noise Compliance Study, Menlo Park
Conducted annual noise compliance monitoring. Provided letter critiquing the regulatory
requirements and recommending improvements.
BART SFO Extension - Construction Vibration and Noise Monitoring
Environmental compliance monitoring of noise and vibration during cut-and-cover construction of
BART subway structure. Work included extensive monitoring of ground vibration at buildings and
structures in close proximity to vibratory pile driving activity to ascertain compliance with
construction specification limits.
Golden Gate Park Concourse Underground Garage, San Francisco
Noise and vibration testing during underground garage construction to monitor for residences and
an old sandstone statue during pile driving.
Fourth Street Bridge Rehabilitation, San Francisco
Construction noise, vibration, and underwater monitoring and support. Work included underwater
noise measurements during pile driving and subsequent lab analysis, and ground-to-water transfer
mobility measurements and subsequent analysis to predict underwater acoustic pressure levels
during concrete abutment demolition.
Caltrain Centralized Equipment Maintenance and Operations Facility, San Jose
Noise study of impacts for new maintenance and operations facility built next to existing residential
neighborhood.
Relevant Expert Consultant Experience
Expert consultant review of the noise studies for the following projects:
Star Concrete Batch Plant Project
Mountain Peak Winery Expansion Project
The Shops at Austin Creek Development
Monterey Downs and Monterey Horse Park Development
Atascadero Del Rio Road Commercial Area Development
WinCo Vallejo Development
Walmart Tehachapi Development
Riverwalk Marketplace, Phase II, Development
Walmart Rohnert Park Expansion
Exhibit D
Via Email and U.S. Mail
August 1, 2019
Gian Paolo Martire, Associate Planner
City of Cupertino
Community Development Department
Planning Division
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
gianm@cupertino.org
Benjamin Fu, Planning Manager
City of Cupertino
Community Development Department
Planning Division
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
benjaminf@cupertino.org
Grace Schmidt, City Clerk
City of Cupertino
City Clerk’s Office
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
cityclerk@cupertino.org
Re: CEQA and Land Use Notice Request for the Project known as De Anza Hotel
Dear Mr. Martire, Mr. Fu and Ms. Schmidt:
I am writing on behalf of the Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union 270 and its
members living in the City of Cupertino (“LiUNA”), regarding the project known as De Anza Hotel, including
all actions related or referring to the construction of a new seven-story hotel with up to 156 rooms, a
rooftop terrace, lounge, and bar and ground-floor conference facilities and restaurant with four levels of below-
grade parking located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard in the City of Cupertino (“Project”).
We hereby request that City of Cupertino (“City”) send by electronic mail, if possible or U.S. Mail to our firm
at the address below notice of any and all actions or hearings related to activities undertaken, authorized,
approved, permitted, licensed, or certified by the City and any of its subdivisions, and/or supported, in whole
or in part, through contracts, grants, subsidies, loans or other forms of assistance from the City, including, but
not limited to the following:
Notice of any public hearing in connection with the project as required by California Planning and
Zoning Law pursuant to Government Code Section 65091.
Any and all notices prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”),
including, but not limited to:
Notices of any public hearing held pursuant to CEQA.
Notices of determination that an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) or supplemental EIR
is required for the project, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.4.
August 1, 2019
CEQA and Land Use Notice Request for the Project known as De Anza Hotel
Page 2 of 2
Notices of any scoping meeting held pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.9.
Notices of preparation of an EIR or a negative declaration for the project, prepared pursuant
to Public Resources Code Section 21092.
Notices of availability of an EIR or a negative declaration for the project, prepared pursuant
to Public Resources Code Section 21152 and Section 15087 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations.
Notices of approval and/or determination to carry out the project, prepared pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21152 or any other provision of law.
Notices of approval or certification of any EIR or negative declaration, prepared pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section 21152 or any other provision of law.
Notices of determination that the project is exempt from CEQA, prepared pursuant to Public
Resources Code section 21152 or any other provision of law.
Notice of any Final EIR prepared pursuant to CEQA.
Notice of determination, prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21108 or
Section 21152.
Please note that we are requesting notices of CEQA actions and notices of any public hearings to be held under
any provision of Title 7 of the California Government Code governing California Planning and Zoning Law.
This request is filed pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2 and 21167(f), and Government
Code Section 65092, which requires agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written
request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.
In addition, we request that the City send to us via email or U.S. Mail a copy of all Planning Commission,
Environmental Review Committee and City Council meeting and/or hearing agendas.
Please send notice by electronic mail, if possible or U.S. Mail to:
Michael Lozeau
Hannah Hughes
Komal Toor
Lozeau Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Ste 150
Oakland, CA 94612
510 836-4200
michael@lozeaudrury.com
hannah@lozeaudrury.com
komal@lozeaudrury.com
Please call if you have any questions. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Hannah Hughes
Legal Assistant
Lozeau | Drury LLP
17901 Von Karman Ave, Suite 600
Irvine, CA 92614
949) 556-8714
www.better-neighborhoods.com/
January 21, 2020
Kirsten Squarcia, MMC
City Clerk for the City of Cupertino
City Council Members of the City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Email: cityclerk@cupertino.org
Re: De Anza Hotel Project – Cupertino
Members of the City Council,
This letter is submitted by Better Neighborhoods as a request that the City Council deny approval of
the Project and remand consideration of the Project to the Planning Commission for further study
and analysis to comply with the requirements of CEQA.
Better Neighborhoods is an organization established to help people have a voice in local
development decisions as prominent as that of planners and developers. Our aim is to encourage
smart growth consistent with the needs of the community while protecting the natural environment
and places of historic and aesthetic significance, supporting California’s need for affordable housing
and balancing the desire for growth with the need for features that make cities livable.
The proposed Project is a seven-story, 156-room hotel with rooftop bar and lounge and related
parking and other facilities, called the De Anza Hotel Project (the “Project”).
The Planning Commission considered and approved the Project. In doing so they reviewed and
approved the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (the “MND”). Better Neighborhoods
submitted a comment letter regarding several aspects of the MND. The staff submitted to the
Planning Commission a reply memorandum prepared by Placeworks, dated December 5, 2019.
The Placeworks memorandum (the “Response Memo”) purports to address all of the comments
raised by Better Neighborhoods. However, most of the comments by Placeworks in the
memorandum are either dismissive of the comments we have made, or are evasive or incorrect
responses, none of which address the fundamental CEQA issues raised by Better Neighborhoods.
Attachment B
City Council of Cupertino
Re: DeAnza Hotel Project
January 21, 2020
Page 2
We write this letter to the City Council in the hopes of explaining more fully our concerns with the
inadequate CEQA analysis undertaken for the proposed Project.
In the prior comment letter submitted to the Planning Commission and in this letter, Better
Neighborhoods provides substantial evidence for this administrative record that supports a fair
argument that the proposed Project might have a significant environmental impact not previously
considered. Accordingly, the City Council should deny the Project approval and remand the Project
to the Planning Commission for further and more complete CEQA review.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The subject property very likely has an underground storage tank (“UST”) that contains waste oil.
In the MND, the Applicant admits that the geophysical survey was performed only “within
accessible areas of the site”. A substantial surface area of the site was ignored, and no borings were
performed, due to limited accessibility. This is discussed in Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous
Materials, on page 4-44 and page 4-47 of the MND. As a result of this limited investigation, the
applicant has not found the location of the UST.
Nonetheless, the Environmental Data Resources (EDR) records show that the UST was installed at
the project site in 1973. There is no record of the UST removal. Therefore, one can and should
conclude that a UST remains buried somewhere on the site.
The Response Memo attempts to avoid this issue by claiming that the chances of finding the UST
are low. It continues by stating that even if the UST is discovered during grading of the site, the
developer will simply comply with California law and sample the soil, remove the tank, clean up
any toxins, and proceed with the project.
We know that the project will have four levels of subterranean parking. The massive hole that must
be created to allow for this underground garage is certain to come upon the UST. Before the
digging begins, we must understand the nature and extent of the contamination.
There is substantial evidence that the UST exists now. CEQA does not allow the City to defer the
nature, type and specification of a mitigation measure. In this case, if the UST has leaked and
contaminated surrounding soil and possibly groundwater, the whole cleanup process will be an
unknown new project. For this reason, the City should require as much additional boring and
testing as may be required until the UST is identified. Then, the soils samples should be taken to
confirm whether or not contamination has occurred. Then, when the facts are known, the City can
require an appropriate mitigation measure.
City Council of Cupertino
Re: DeAnza Hotel Project
January 21, 2020
Page 3
General Plan Amendment
The Project site, a 1.29-acre parcel at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, is currently developed with
a one-story Goodyear Auto Service Center. The site is now designated under the General Plan as
Commercial/Residential, General Commercial (CG) with special development regulations (rg),
referred to as CG-rg.
This Project is in conflict with the General Plan. Simply Amending the General Plan to
accommodate this Project is improper.
The Vision for the Homestead Special Area is “The Homestead Villa neighborhood is largely
developed and is not anticipated to change in character.”
This General Plan Amendment is the worst sort of “spot zoning.” The staff report clearly states that
It should be noted that the General Plan amendments would only apply to the proposed hotel.” In
Foothill Communities Coalition v. County of Orange, the court of appeal concluded that spot zoning
can be found where an isolated parcel is zoned less restrictively than surrounding property. This
project is exactly this sort of impermissible spot zoning. The developer has not suggested, and there
is no reason why this Project should justify a General Plan Amendment. There is no substantial
public need for this hotel here, at this location in the City and this hotel project certainly is not in the
public interest.
Also, the City should not attempt to allocate hotel rooms across Special Areas within the General
Plan and change the height limitations within this Homestead Special Area – unless the City
conducts an exhaustive and thoughtful analysis of what the future will likely bring for development
across the City if this Project is approved. There are many, many unintended consequences of this
General Plan Amendment. For example, if this Project is approved, there will be increased pressure
and demand to densify properties near this Project site, and the City will have set a precedent with
this particular approval, thus making it much more likely that additional General Plan Amendments
will be approved for intense uses and for taller and more prominent buildings – thus further
changing the essential character of this area of the City. Also, if hotel rooms are moved out of other
Special Areas and placed into the Homestead area, the City has done nothing more that create
pressure for future plan amendment requests in the other Special Areas that are now losing allocated
hotel rooms.
The General Plan was approved after a very long and information rich process. Now, the CG
zoning district is intended to provide a means of guiding development to establish retail, office and
services “that ensure the maximum compatibility with surrounding residential areas.” This
Project is directly contradictory to this. The City should not be whimsical to alter the General Plan
just to accommodate one developer’s desire to build a hotel where it does not belong.
City Council of Cupertino
Re: DeAnza Hotel Project
January 21, 2020
Page 4
Compatibility with the General Plan
The MND fails to analyze and explain why this hotel Project should be approved, notwithstanding
all of the many inconsistencies with the General Plan.
Staff reports that “Staff has evaluated the proposed General Plan Amendments and concludes that
based on the net positive fiscal impacts of the project (see Attachment 7) and minimal
environmental impacts of the project, the proposed amendment supports several of the City’s other
General Plan goals including:…” However, staff fails entirely to comply with CEQA and identify,
analyze and explain all of inconsitiencies that the Project creates with the General Plan. The MND
is practically silent on all of the many inconsistencies between this Project and the General Plan.
There are many, many examples of this, but just a few are instructive:
First, Page PA-3 of the General Plan, regarding Special Areas, states that “[The Special Areas]
should be enhanced with more pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities; supported by focused
development standards.” This Project does the opposite, including ignoring the development
standards that have been developed for this area.
Second, Page LU-12 of the General Plan (LU-1.3.1: Commercial and Residential Uses), regarding
Land Use Allocations, states that “All mixed-use areas with commercial zoning will require retail as
a substantial component.”. The Staff was a bit disingenuous when they refer to the compatibility of
the Project with Goal LU-1.3 – that encourages mixed use areas in certain circumstances. However,
the specific strategies for achieving this goal seem to preclude putting a hotel in the middle of this
residential area.
For this reason alone, the MND fails to comply with CEQA. The City should deny the approvals of
this Project and have the CEQA document updated to explore the General Plan inconsistencies. In
fact, Better Neighborhoods believes that CEQA requires a full environmental impact report to be
completed if the General Plan is to be amended.
We urge the City to deny the approvals and require that a full environmental impact report be
created, so that the requirements of CEQA can be met for a General Plan Amendment.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
IN our prior letter, Better Neighborhoods raises several questions about the GHG analysis in the
MND. The Response Memo attempts to respond to all of these comments, but does so
inadequately. First, we think the GHG analysis does not take into account all of the sensitive
receptors that will surround the Project. The City acknowledges that prior to mitigation, there will
be construction air quality impacts. The Response Memo sates that causing the large construction
equipment to use heavy duty air filters should bring the total GHG impacts to a level of less than
City Council of Cupertino
Re: DeAnza Hotel Project
January 21, 2020
Page 5
significant. We would like to see the arithmetic of how this was confirmed. Also, does this merely
create a smeared average of GHG toxins, but in fact result in some nearby sensitive receptors
actually receiving a large dose of the bad gases?
Also, Mitigation Measure GHG-1 for buying GHG “credits” or “offsets” is not a proper mitigation
measure. Even though the local air quality board may allow it, in fact this does nothing for the
neighbors that will be harmed by the bad GHG that the Project creates. We urge the City to reject
GHG offset credits, and instead require the developer to actually reduce the GHG emissions – not
simply pay to pretend they are not harmful. Al Gore may buy offsets so that he can fly in a private
jet with a clear conscience, but this is not a proper use of the City’s power to protect its citizens.
Noise and Light Nuisance
The Response Memo indicates that the noise study contemplated the decibel impact of multiple
human conversations from the roof top bar.
Better Neighborhoods primary noise concern about the rooftop bar relates to large events and
amplified sound. We require that to protect the surrounding sensitive receptors, the Hotel Project
should include a condition of approval that prohibits amplified sound (speakers, music,
megaphones, etc.) entirely. Also, it should prohibit more than a certain number of persons on the
rooftop at one time, based on the cumulative noise levels that could be created by a crowd.
In addition to the Noise issue, there is no analysis of light and glare impacts that will be created
when events occur on the bar rooftop area. We urge the City to deny the approvals, and require a
full analysis of all lighting fixtures, glare and colored, blinking or other lighting that will be visible
from surrounding properties.
We also require that to protect the surrounding sensitive receptors, the Hotel Project should include
a condition of approval that prohibits any bright lights, strobe lights, colored lighting or other
obnoxious use of light – if it can be seen from the surrounding neighborhood.
Light, Glare and Shadow
Better Neighborhoods previously asked for a shadow study. The Response Memo states that there
are no thresholds of significance, and that shadow studies are only conducted for impacts on public
spaces. This is not correct.
If there is no threshold of significance, then the City is obligated to use one that is otherwise
applicable, and possibly from another city.
The shadow impact we are concerned with is the shadow this overly tall building will throw onto
surrounding residential uses. Please complete a shadow study to show that nearby residences will
City Council of Cupertino
Re: DeAnza Hotel Project
January 21, 2020
Page 6
not use the reasonable use of their front yards and back yards – especially during the summer
months. We can recommend the thresholds of significance established by the City of Los Angeles
for shade and shadow impacts on residential properties.
Development Agreement
The City intends to enter into a Development Agreement with the applicant. The developer will
obtain substantial benefits under this agreement – not the least of which is a General Plan
Amendment that rezones their property and allows for this dense and incompatible project.
The only significant consideration provided by the applicant is a one-time $500,000 Community
Amenity Funding payment. In the context of a project that will cost perhaps $15 million or $20
million to complete, this fee is a paltry sum. Many cities negotiate Development Agreements that
result in much more favorable benefits for the City. The City and we citizens are entitled to receive
park fees, traffic mitigation fees, school fees and other benefits – that would justify the substantial
value being transferred to this developer.
We urge the City Council to deny this Development Agreement and return the negotiation to the
City Manager and the Planning Commission to come up with a Development Agreement that is not
a naked charity gift to this developer.
This letter provides substantial evidence for this administrative record that supports a fair argument
that the proposed Project might have a significant environmental impact not previously considered.
Accordingly, the City Council should deny the Project approval and remand the Project to the
Planning Commission for further and more complete CEQA review.
Sincerely,
Better Neighborhoods, Inc.
Attachment C