DRC Summary 072105
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
To:
Mayor and City Council Members
Planning Commissioners
From:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development
Subj:
July 25, 2005
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE
July 21,2005.
Date:
Chapter 19.136 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for
A eal of decisions made b the Desi Review Committee
1. Application
EXC-2005-12; Alan Ford (E. Hoffman Enterprises), 19960 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Description
Sign Exception for a letter height of 24 inches, which exceeds the maximum letter
height of 18 inches.
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective July 21, 2005. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on August
4, 2005.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of July 21, 2005
Resolution No. 218
Approved Plans
2. Application
R-2005-18; Baldev Jandu, 10276 Orange Avenue
Description
Residential Design Review for a 2,027 square foot first and second story addition
to an existing 810 square foot residence and an exception for a reduced side yard
setback on the first floor to 5 feet on both sides.
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective July 21, 2005. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on August
4, 2005.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of July 21, 2005
Resolution No. 219
Approved Plans
G:planninglDrc/07210S summaryletter.doc
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Alex Stanford, Planning Department
Application: EXC-2005-12
19960 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Date: July 21, 2005
Project Description: Sign exception to allow a letter height of twenty-four inches,
which exceeds the eighteen-inch maximum allowed wall sign height (based on square
footage and setback from property line) on an approved commercial building.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of EXC-2005-12, based on the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, E. Hoffman Enterprises, owns a commercial building consisting of 3,303
square feet approximately 86 feet from the South East corner of Stevens Creek
Boulevard and South Blaney Avenue. The building tenant is Charles Schwab, and E.
Hoffman Enterprises has proposed to replace the existing channel letters on the Charles
Schwab wall sign. The exception requested is for:
Wall sign height
The applicant proposes to replace the existing wall sign channel letters on the north
elevation facing Stevens Creek Boulevard. The proposed height of the letters "h" and
"I" in" charles" is twenty-four inches. The sign ordinance allows a maximum wall sign
height of eighteen inches.
DISCUSSION:
Findin~s for Exception
Per Section 17.44.040 of the Municipal Code, the Design Review Committee may grant
an exception based upon the following findings:
A. Literal Enforcement of the Sign Regulations will result in restrictions inconsistent with the
spirit and intent of this title.
The intent of the Sign Ordinance is to "provide architectural and aesthetic harmony of
signs as they relate to building design" and to "provide [sign regulations] that will
allow for good visibility for the public and the needs of the business...." Two of the
seventeen channel letters in the wall sign exceed the eighteen-inch maximum by eight
inches due to the lower-case font of the sign. Staff believes the sign is attractive and that
the heights of the "h" and "I" letters are appropriate for the scale of the sign. If the "h"
I-I
July 21, 2005
EXC-2005-12
and "I" channel letters were reduced to eighteen inches, the remaining letters would be
too small.
B. The granting of the exception will not result in a condition that is materially detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare.
The signs do not create any health or safety problems.
c. Least modification of the prescribed regulations and the mzmmum varzance that will
accomplish the purpose.
Per the Sign Ordinance, the applicant is allowed a 35 feet long wall sign. However, the
applicant is proposing a much shorter wall sign at 24'2."
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Plan Set
Prepared by: Alex Stanford, Planning Department . ~ t
Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen~
G: IPlanninglDRClstaff rep 12005 IEXC-2005 -12. doc
2
l-;c
EXC-2005-12
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW TWO CHANNEL
LETTERS IN A WALL SIGN TO EXCEED THE ALLOWED WALL SIGN
HEIGHT ON AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-12
E. Hoffman Enterprises
19960 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2005-12, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
EXC-2005-12 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
July 21, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
1-3
Resolution No.
Page 2
EXC-2005-12
July 21, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Charles Schwab," dated March 16, 2005,
consisting of two pages, except as amended by this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of July 21, 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
G: \ Planning \ DRC\ res \2005\ EXC-2005-12 res.doc
)-4-
EXC-2005-12
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 218
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW TWO CHANNEL
LETTERS IN A WALL SIGN TO EXCEED THE ALLOWED WALL SIGN
HEIGHT ON AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-12
E. Hoffman Enterprises
19960 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and
compatible with the surrounding area;
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of
the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the
purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2005-12, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
EXC-2005-12 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
July 21, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. 218
Page 2
EXC-2005-12
July 21, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Charles Schwab," dated March 16, 2005,
consisting of two pages, except as amended by this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of July 21, 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Giefer and Chairperson Miller
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Isl Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director.of Community Development
I sl Marty Miller
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
G: 1 Planning 1 DRCI res 12005 1 EXC-2005-12 res.doc
e
..
:2,3 iD E<Zl 1 '-g
~ - E 9la e ~
Ii') S 0 ~u. Si .- ~
-0I~~1Il:!!'" ~C" +
.5_....Cl~.EJ:.Q ~
c., 1 ';: "5:t ~ ~ ~ =. III
)CUll.!!! =>.F ew "
. i 0 III ci 0.. J:: - S
~ 0.. IJ) ..21 ~
..... < ro U! I... .-
.g",., ~.; -'TIt! C)
;f$ ~ .
. \9
tn ci I"'
~ WV ~
'0
CI) . ~~ ~
...~ ~o.. ~
... t: ~ .!; ---'
CD ~ -g . .c~ ~:'"'-<
Q) 0 _ (.')
..J ~~ ~ .~~
CO.D (.') -00) OJ
-"5-0 ~ti~:g:r:: ~
A' "'0 2 .c co ; ::;; (J)
W'Q)c 0)-.:::5 .-
Ctii::J .cl:D'O.o U " ~
.gOE >.~~5 :Q
-~ "",-.- $
.... ... ~.2:> -o.5:.f; d5 trJ
_ _-- ",,"'Ex '"
... '-VO~ ~~~~ ~
CI).l:i2 a:l~.2:>O t\~ in
E 0 "'"C " .. "C -."! -
.~.E ::arE~ -~
E Q) = Q) Q) co '-.--
CI)....o.D 3:-oEUi ~
__0= (I.)"'--c: N
CJ..J~'~ !~~.; ~
ca (J) <D .D - .D -..N
-CI).~~~~'i~~ci> ~
0. ,,-.. ~_C \.3
(,)l:l)OO-0ct1"':p
co1ii~oEi::~.~
CI)_cc=1l2.!1CX +-:+
,-vgemcoQ)_ClQ)
a:LL alf- ;oU.lC<;:Ul'O ,
.. .... .q.-Th
ct NE
cD "'C "0
~ ;::: Q) c:
1ft .c ~ ~ ::J c:
V~Q) $:"'Oc_o'-
U:S c: ~oo. i51 ...:
__ m 0 19 ~ ~ . E g
.s:::Q) ~ UJn:I_o "C
.... 0 c_:=:aE ~
a. ~.- 01 3: 0 - t:...
0.- ",,, - - :::. c
~ "C ::~i5o~ (1)
.....ch ~ =03::g-o .9
,-v~ .5 3:co.c=Q) c
~Q) .... =t:oQ)o 0
_,,> o..~:::Jcn(fJ.!g."'O
,.. Q) Q) :::JIn(l)coa.~Q)
... .... .D o"OQ).oCl)._=
CI) '0 0 J: c>= o..c-aS
a) - = 0 CU - - co (f.I
a.."'C _~ ",oo..c-o:=:....c
E Om 1:' C CD 0 c: 3: O)-a; en
~ Q)~O co 11)= :::5 >.-.D.!:
Oo..:::J !!: o<D,ea.O--
CI) Eg~Cf.) 0= 0 0)8 ~~.~
Coc._c ..2o.gE-=a>Cl)
(.') 0.= - . =... -(fJ ([I -
U lD cu 3:~ aj.D.c~,g:s (fJ iO
as .o>.~c~~~'Eoo,gcB
_ ::::.r..::::.5'- o.c .c ;: (1) to ;J: 0.2' co
i..-3:>..c:...IIJ(.'l - _Cl)e.
Q. Cl)lDg..gj2Cl)
CI) .... 0).2: i51- - In
,.. co;!:: .5!:! ~ Q)
...-C0'5.00"l:::
a:W .~~.5 ~"O2
UJU)>cn&iP
CD
tZ)
tZ)"
iJ.)"
C,) >-
C,) ~
~;
=
~ .~
o ~
~ ~
.~~
U)~
"E
~
~
:J
o
'"
<=
o
~
-'"
o
...
0>
.
E
'"
~
~
v;
>-.
~
~
.
-"
~
;S
i<
Q
Z
~
00
'"
~
~
.
8
'"
,
ill
'"
<0
~
~
"
<=
Jl
0..
~
~
.
~
g
o
'"
:li
'"
<0
-
~
.
"'@
::;:
"
E
o
"
.,;
~
1$
g
~
""
'C
.~
~
@J
~
o
~
r::
.0
"C'"
~ ..
:=g
:;;~
>.c
~ "
"'''
_w
"' 0
,,-
:;;"
1n!E
~ "
" "
00.
:Z:(I)
"lie!
c< I"
"',.. w
~ II I-
"'.<: 0
f- Z
.
..i:i
~
~
E
o
"
~
~
"
g
<=
~
""
'C
~
<=
.!?P
~
>I~I [g
~ 1;) E
'" E! '"
0:':'"
.;, ~ ~
- ~ C
. ~ "C
(f) (I) ~
t-
'. -"
'"
E
"
"
1
< ,
-+
.Q
~ -c ~
~ 0 ~ ~ -=
Gs-o - &. .s~
cC: ~ x :E~
._CO 'S~>:c
"'0 lD 0 (ij ::> co
CD (.) ~ ~ 0
~$ 1? € ~c
'"5 cu 3: ....!2l
~ '7 E E ~ (/)
:J = ::I:::J -.. 0)
o gee ~ ~
......-0(1) .E.E E~
-CI)COW ..2.2 2x
... _ ..:;"iCU <U _(1)
CI)_O;[;; Ox "0 "Co
..-g~ .!!:!~ .$ e:s;
E.-.!f!-~ m-.c.B .a
.... (1) "'C '" 01.;;:: (.') i
.c o.c _ Q:l~ ~..o~$=
CI),.. E:cIlJ'E.....om(.')~m
'-u o ca(j)-iUcu..E';.!S! cUi
(,) (.) t;:l= a..D....om ms; .
O lDCQ:l_=.c__E_C)
.DO)-...._U)_..... ""C
... _'-..r:::..oS:::I-i'sQ)..o;
'-v =(I)CJ:I=cna. c.l:l=1IJ
-o.C :~e'j~2~.!~.~'~
PlftO)ca.r:::.l)ro~mU) CD_
CD """cu.!:""i' c 0..._ o.~ ~ ~o
-- 5E1;j:B ~-aB m:m c e
a: ~ft '-.a ::J C'U n:I f! a:l 't Q) _Ql (IS
VI en = a. t) u.. 0) u... ~ ..J en a.
CD
'-'
~
H
'. ..J ,;,
.~ t ~ ... ~
1\ - f g
.. ~ IZ\il fl
I __ J
G. i
- !
I
n- \.. i
~ \~ j
I K i l
r
',.
"
CD
o
0
~~
-
w :
Uz
~~ ~
-
o
a..
"
:;' ..
- >
" .!!!
.. ~
0.. 0
CD
x
"
~
o
"'
c
~
>
..
Ii)
"
QjE'
~.
o~
c:
ca
a..
,~
..-.
~ \J\ ' ..s,
~- ~
.,.... -
.-..sQ
~
~ - -- --- --"
~
"?
~
~
~ ]
0
<;"T
,
,
Q - -~
l.J).
.~ I I~
.~
~
r--
-
-
~vrv18 'S
1
VJ
I
I
L c- ~.
,-
l.,
g
<'
::s.----
."2
--J.:
~
(,::C)
j 4
-G'I/<:""'>
~ ~ "
-5 :;;;, '3;
0~ s;..
~d\~
~ 0 ~
i!<. ....9 _ .,
o a--..-...:....--'
~ <S
U,..-
.-.
I
+.
j
I
J
~Ii 'm~~I ~.
\
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Piu Ghosh, Assistant Planner
Application: R-2005-18
10276 Oran!?;e Avenue
Date: July 21, 2005
Project Description: Exception to the Rl Ordnance to allow a 5-foot side setback when
10 feet is required to construct a new 2,825 square foot two story single-family residence
on a property zoned Rl-7.5 (Single Family Residential).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of R-2005-18, based on the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
On July 7, 2005, the Committee considered the project and directed the applicant to:
. Provide a Privacy Protection Planting plan
. Provide the setbacks for the homes on the two sides of the proposed project
. Provide dimensioned building elevations with maximum height called out.
DISCUSSION:
Privacy Protection Planting plan
The Privacy Protection Planting plan has been provided. The applicant is proposing to
plant 7 (seven) Italian Cypresses in his right side yard and 6 (six) Italian Cypresses in
his left side yard as privacy protection trees. These trees tend to grow vertically and can
easily trimmed to allow adequate emergency fire access.
The plan is missing some trees along the Southerly property line. Staff recommends
adding one IS-gallon Cupressus Sempervirens - Italian Cypress and one IS-gallon Pinus
Helipensis - Aleppo Pine in this area to provide adequate screening for the adjacent
neighbor.
Setbacks for adjacent homes
Commissioner Giefer requested side yard information of the two adjacent homes. The
following is an aerial photograph showing the subject property and neighboring
properties with the side yard setbacks called out.
d - 2.....
Figure 1 (Dimeusious not to scale)
Please note that the applicant provided the side yard measurements for the adjacent
homes.
Height of building at tallest point
The height of the building at its tallest point is 23'4" at the front elevation. The
maximum height of a building allowed under the Rl Ordinance is 28' .
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Plan Set
Piu Ghosh, Assistant Planner
CiddYWordell,CityPlanner~ f..,r ~
----
Prepared by:
Approved by:
G: \ Planning \ DRe \ staff rep \ 2005 \ R-2005-18bSRdoc
2
;)-3,
R-2005-18
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN EXCEPTION TO THE Rl ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A
FIVE FOOT SETBACK WHEN TEN FEET IS REQUIRED TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW 2,825 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE STORY
RESIDENCE.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
R-2005-18
Baldev S. Jandu
10276 Orange Avenue
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has
held one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit qnd intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. The proposed residence will not result in significant adverse visual impacts as
viewed from adjoining properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. R-2005-18, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
R-2005-18 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of July
21, 2005, and are inco.rporated by reference herein.
":;-4-
Resolution No.
Page 2
R-2005-18
July 21, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the plan set as part of the staff report to the Design Review
Committee dated July 21, 2005, except as may be amended by conditions in this
resolution.
2. PRIVACY PROTECTION PLANTING PLAN
A detailed privacy-planting plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval prior to issuance of the building permits. The plan shall be
consistent with the privacy screening provisions in the Chapter 19.28 of the Zoning
Ordinance and the recommendations of the staff report.
3. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT
The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future
property owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection
requirements. The precise language will be subject to approval of Planning staff.
Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development
Department prior to final occupancy of the residence.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020; you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
G: \Planning\DRClres\2005\R-2005-/8 res. doc
;)- 5'
Resolution No.
Page 3
ATTEST:
Ciddy Wordell,
City Planner
G:IPlanl1il1gIDRClresI2005IR-2005-18 res. doc
R-2005-18
APPROVED:
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
July 21, 2005
(;2 ~(p
R-2005-18
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 219
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN EXCEPTION TO THE Rl ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A
FIVE FOOT SETBACK WHEN TEN FEET IS REQUIRED TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW 2,825 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE STORY
RESIDENCE.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
R-2005-18
Baldev S. Jandu
10276 Orange Avenue
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has
held one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title;
2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
3. The proposed residence will not result in significant adverse visual impacts as
viewed from adjoining properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. R-2005-18, is here by approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
R-2005-18 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of July
21, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. 219
Page 2
R-2005-18
July 21, 2005
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "New 2-Story House", located at 10276
Orange Avenue, Cupertino dated February & March 2005, consisting of six pages,
except as amended by this resolution.
2. PRIVACY PROTECTION PLANTING PLAN
A detailed privacy-planting plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval prior to issuance of the building permits. The plan shall
incorporate one of the following items to address the privacy impacts of the
bedroom window above the garage facing the right side of the house.
The applicant shall either
. Raise the sill height of the window to be five feet from the finished floor, or
. Get a signed waiver from the adjacent neighbor at 10284 Orange Avenue or
. The plan shall be consistent with the privacy screening provisions in the
Chapter 19.28 of the Zoning Ordinance and the recommendations of the staff
report.
3. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT
The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future
property owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection
requirements. The precise language will be subject to approval of Planning staff.
Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development
Department prior to final occupancy of the residence.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
G: IPlanninglDRClresl2005\R -2005-18 res. doc
Resolution No. 219 R-2005-18 July 21, 2005
Page 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Giefer and Chairperson Miller
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/ Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Community Development Director
/s/ Marty Miller
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Design Review Committee
G: IPlanninglDRClres\2005\R -2005-/8 res. doc
III ;
fn i ~
z
::>> -
!!
. '>
O.
Zlll..
>.,.
>CO - . :rJ ~ t
11:11111)
aCl ~.. ~
OZC H]lh
1'- I-~U
.1 ~ . ~ j ~ ,
cnoo z
c ' I
I(D! ., i 'r In,
.
N.-..... .. !Un":nj' ~ "h ~UIII
_NlI: .. > ~ ~ I h II ~ .~ 1I1! 11 I !II
0111 a:1U ~ i I llll 'r
lUa a 'r 10
111"-'" HL I Ji! I d I
z~
z~;:) ~.c
i ".. - !i II n II i III
eu OlD ihlll !I ...1 a I III ,.u~u
l!l
KIlII_ i XI
~ !
I
o
'"
lU
.~
/1
/ I
/ I
'- // I
, / I
'>( I
./ , I
,
" I
!lMaN
aTOEl
G
'"
.,.
;,
ll11I!
=
c::>
=
-<
......:
!!!'=
I
-
!!!
~
'"
----~l t
~
, II
--- '~
---~
/ -
'- /,........ -
'- --=....- -4
'- ".... J
, ,
,
,
'"
,,;
...
o
'"
M
=
;>-
-<
,
~! i II "'~
.Ii! I
- I
o
ru
...
m-OCI
m_J)JJIl)lIIIl'lllllXl I !lMaN
ii
I I i I HI !
_,...A
KIlII_ i XI
'"
s
I
IJJ)]
1Il
~ 3:
. ~ ()j
-lTJ
i ~I
Ii
l!l
Ii
1"--
46 :J EI n
t
~
z
::s
ll..
c:::
o
o
...J
U.
I-
CJ)
"""'
",
,
,
,
,
""
""" Iii
',.1
___0. . ~--:--==~
j _LLLLLLLJ--1LLJ. \1 J
:;-:;-~~,-",.,-"u= -- -~- , !JJJ~.:::i::L-i.-{1~~
_LJ-.J_LLLLJ_LJ .1_1,1_1_1"j,J_LLJ_LLJ_LLLLLLLLJI" "
~..::!-d.-:d..-.Jd~d~--1'}~d-d.-:d..--1ddd.l.Lt~.:U..~d..::!::!.-:!..--1.J,. " \
... .. "
..-
,/ ..1
---- / ::' ' ,
_____~ ~' ' ,r----- '..
----t-S ;' "1 __.JI
-<, t: I
" '11
" :: I
" '11
" :: I
_____ nn' ,,'
, li-:--- nn nn_n~
, ~::E: ___ ...... n_nn
" > [J .... \". -,-----
" :J D ..../ ........."""
" Q: ;'....... \
" ~............. \
" ~.....____ I
" ',.......... -..,
" " ........ I
, ' I
" " .... I
" " ......-/
, I
'\ " /
, y
'. I
- - I
__N ~
,.-_______ l' ,
-- -~
/ ,
/
,
,
------------(/ u-/
, ,
:,.--
,
;' II ;'
,
,
/
.-_nn__n__ , /-
,jr -----------,r~ I
, ~ ~ ,
" ,~------
, , ~ ,
// ','\-----
,-
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
'"
,
,
,
r------r-
" I,'
, I,
, "
" I'
" I ,/
" - I /
" IU ",""
" ~I /1
" " 1.i.Y~ I
" " k::l x I
" "/~:... I
, l',_. I
" .... -b I
-----y t!:\eu I
'"
"
, ,
, "
, ,
, ,
, "
, ,
,,-, L______~-
l---\--+----------------~ "
, , ,
...
~---,
,
~
~----------------------------------~
_!-~~.,," - /' I
=
R
CJ)!! II I :~ 1111!!i I I
W IIi . I .":11 · I I I
b ft~ ! I. i il Jlli Ili.i ! . ~I
Z I I ~-I II:n.. I~. ~!I!iIIIM I II I
~ i! i I nii ! ;1' I:~II; 1~11I1111t.;hl ~. I ~ ;1
~ fr!i I Ill} . ",II . 'ill i I. ~ '!Qlli!!l~. II ; I P . Ii!
9 lli;I!! !~il!Ii"I'.i.l L.!ij.ld.l~~ liail'li!l! in iLrlMLh.ii 10.
u. till- I ..- .;11 tL"III!III!;~ I -:lo!!.' i.~ I "I .IU. I. I.i ,i.
8 m~!~Jj!!!==!L~~=!!. ~:!tq!~==~~~~b!~~!b !I!!!m!~!~!_.,!!!:!!fi!
1..6 :J EI f1
"1
....-,
I '
"-Ik.~
%
C
C
.."
~~
,po
,
,
,
,
/
/
,
r
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
I
,
, --IT
, ,
L_____ ~_
,
,
,
,
,
,I II
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
i
,
-
, '
, '
, '
,
,
,
,
T
'"
w
'"
w
>
[J
u
.~
_.... .....,...."
h
T
z
:5
0..
IX:
o
o
....J
u..
CI
Z
C\I
ij---\
I /, I
I ~iL-/ I' I
~ ?"\l~ I
~ 1/ ';'"u I I
i?I ;c;t", I 'I
-.1/ I> I ,
y/-_~__..J , I
---r---{ uA
~r---------------~
h .-~.-,~s---l9-'L-.<
....
,
0)1
' ID
. ;10
/
J
J
- ----,
--------~---------- I
r,- ~ I
I I -. I
Jh ' II I I 1\
I , --- I II I I_ i'
" I I, I
r-" , I '0 Z I I I I _ _ _ --I
- , rr-- I
------- I, )/11',: I I
I' it' ~:r', ~____J
d I , im '" / " I
11" " "
\' I" _.,
iill _~__
- " /
~
~
~~
>1>
o
l-
v
~
....
I
K
..
l'
t
~6__:J El n
---,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r------------l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
____.J
I
Z'
::5
a..
I-
Z
LLJ
~
W
~
m
,t-,8
r
~
'r
.,
:E-
Ox
o
"'-
"''1'
W"
"'-
o
1:'1
.
1:'1
~,
.
~
~
~
,
,.
.<-.a
"
:,
lu
x
W:E
X CJ~
<l: 0 ,
l:lCll::ru
N
-
,
!!l
....
'"
/
Elf]
--------
L6 :J
-.1'
Q
"
"
"
"
o
.L-.8E
""
""
'"
<l:
'"
<.S
....
:j
~
J
I
(
N
,
::1:=
Ox
0_
"',.,
""
WN
"'-
I
....
Ql
'j'
'"
:E-
ElX
"'.
",'j'
W"
"'-
:o::M
o
.1
..
L
I
'\'
..
-' -
N '
, '
..
.
,
"
r
1
r
~
,-",
--~-------------1
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
!zll
iO
,-
it-
i~
iw
:...J
iw
,
:0:::
!Lfi
Ie:::
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
L-J-tr--------------J
,
,
,
,
t"-,t";
~I I
'ltG-.0'
~
~
I'
EE3
,
,
,
,
,
ml
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
~~
II ~ I
en ilij11!l1l!
~! I ! I ~i I
O~; II I ;., Ii
ZII2 I d ~
Z I> I I If 114
o~ lIII I!I ~ I il!
i= 1~5i &l ! !; I!;I I'
~:;II ! . I! 1If11l1 I
w Co ~ I.. b. Ii
m !.I ..1 il ~llllld
o:::ll~ill' ...; II I I
Q In. ~i I ~J: il.lldl
0::: l!i ft..1l .lMl Iii'." W
w~di! R l!!l iIi ~': b
~lIli 'illlll;i tl
~ ~!~i h j~~~1 n~~J!
:<!it"3N","O'/ y 1'3 ;~q pau6!saO I <I) ~ L
I
I
--------..,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
i~11
,-
i~
:>
iw
:...J
iW
it-
iZ
:0
Jo:=
iLL.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
__m____ !
u,
"-.r::
I
~ ~ U HI!
I I
S 119 UI
'-
I
i I ~I tlllt
L 6:) E.
II
I~ I
ild II
d.
na~J:''l. ^'J<t"N'i1
I U~ I ~ II
~.lll
iJ i!!
~
~
II
B
I
~
~ J 1\
Ui~
~
K I
T --~---~~--,
I I
I I
I I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
m I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I lmi
I I I
I I I
rn_1 I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I ~~--------l
I I I I
I I I I
IlIEEl I I I I I
83\ I I I I I
I I izl I i II
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I :0 I
I I I 'Z
...-, I- I :0
I I ,I- I
I I :<( I I-
I I :1-
i ...-, ,> I
I I I !~
:w m I
I I '...J I
I I :w I :w
I I I
I I I I I...J
I 'I- I :w
I
I I ::::c I :1-
:(!) I
I I I :u..
I I I- I
I I :0:: I 'W
I I :...J
I I I I
m II I I I m I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I m I I
~ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
~ m I I
I I
.. I I
~ I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I- I Ilm~lilJlI I I
tt.'flkl1.1!l1 . II. EHrnIU I r'
I Ii' 11
CJ) I ~ ~ s, II!
~! II! R ~i I
~.. i!; ! Ii II
z i iu i ii 114
e ii-I ~ i !I I!;II_
~ ;~I-..I ~ I~ I!ia 5~
~ Hi~~ 1:1 '1 ~III d
w~I~~ ;~i h II III
g51!d ~~ I ~I~ dl'dl
0:: I. III! Ii !II;!I III~"IW
w ~~I:l Ii!; ~~;;a
S lnilll!m: i i~l!!
...t...l J ..1....,,1 J.._;:~_
~'
i1i'
0:,
'---
K
'...-..........
L6 :J EI fl
=
=
z
-<
....:
!!!,O
I
~
!!!
!
=
;:;-
-<
U) -..... ~ i
<:i.
.
.
IlI'IIt
II
9
I!l
'"
EO
~
~
~;
~~
I
~
~
'"
+
...
~
-'"
~
~
~!
~
;
il
f----
-71
"71-i
~
, II
-=~
....
l-----'
,
,
r"""""-----..., "I
I', 1:1 1--'
~ ' )iii.;-J.___L
,,,,, ,J r
L~,-_ ' u __J
~
N
, , /
... 1/
I', /t'
I \(
+_J ,
,
,
,
/
/
;
II
IIIJI
~
~
~I
~~I
~
I I
---.
\11
~J \\ .
~lfJ~\ Ii
1.-6 :J EJ fl
:9,"t.'3N~O/ y '1'3 :Aq p;u6!sao
no~.t'~ ^'3O"N'il
131~ I ~ II