CC 09-06-05
·
CUPERJINO
APPROVED MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, September 6, 2005
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Kwok called the meeting to order in the Council Chamber, 10350 Torre
A venue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. He asked for a moment of
silence in recognition of the passing of Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, as
well as for all of the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
ROLL CALL
City Council members present: Mayor Patrick Kwok, Vice-Mayor Richard Lowenthal, and
Council members, Sandra James, Dolly Sandoval, and Kris Wang. Council members absent:
none.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENT A nONS
1. Proclamation for the 9-vear-old Cupertino All-Star baseball team for winning the
championship. (No documentation in packet).
Mayor Kwok presented the proclamation to the baseball team members and their coach.
2. Proclamation for the Cupertino Senior All-Star baseball team for being the runner-up.
(No documentation in packet).
Mayor Kwok presented the proclamation to a team representative.
3. Presentation to the Cupertino Block Leader Program from the California Association of
Public Information Officials (CAPrO). (No documentation in packet).
Communications Manager Rick Kitson said that the City had received an honorable
mention for its Block Leader Program for innovation and outreach. On behalf of CAPrO,
he presented the award to Mayor Kwok, who accepted it on behalf of the City Council.
Council. He also thanked City employee Laura Domondon Lee, who manages the Block
Leader Program, and said that the public was invited to attend Block Leader training that
would be presented on September 15.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 2
4. Proclamation to CUDertino's Ham Radio Emergencv Coordinator Jim Oberhofer for
receiving the California Emergency Services Association (CESA) Coastal Chapter Silver
Award. (No documentation in packet).
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator Marsha Hovey said that Mr. Oberhofer has
volunteered hundreds of hours to the city since 1999. She said this award recognizes him
for the software program he developed, and which is now being used by amateur radio
operators allover the country to speed up communications. Mayor Kwok presented the
proclamation.
POSTPONEMENTS - None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
The City Clerk distributed the following documents:
· A perspective drawing of the Adobe Terrace project (item No. 21)
· A draft resolution for the Redevelopment Agency meeting, to be held later in the evening
· A letter encouraging people to bicycle and walk to the Golden Jubilee on September 24
and 25, to reduce parking impacts
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Dennis Whittaker made several public service announcements; (1) He encouraged people to
participate in the Optimists Clubs event, a walk to benefit Families with Kids with Cancer. He
said they are also helping to sponsor the JW House; (2) He said the local USO (United Service
Organizations, Inc.) desperately needs volunteers, and people can volunteer as little 4 hours a
month; and (3) He talked about the importance ofremembering the active duty troops and their
families, and mentioning them as often as possible to wish them home safe, sound, and soon.
Deborah Hill asked the City Council to support a program at the library to provide free reading
lessons for all ages. She also extended her sympathy to all the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
Rusty Britt said that it was too bad the Superior ruled to allow outsiders as signatories on
measures A, B, and C. She said that the opponents of the measures are a collection of special
interest groups and officials who frequently do not represent the Cupertino residents, and they
hope the name-dropping will impress the voters. She said the authors in favor are simply
Cupertino residents with no political affiliations with developers, and they are trying to preserve
the suburban character of the city.
J ames said that she wished to correct some statements made by the last speaker. She said that it is
okay to have a difference of opinion, but people opposed to the initiatives should not be
characterized as not being members of the community, because a majority of them are.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR
Sandoval/James moved and seconded to approve the items 5-7, 10, 12-14, and 16-18 on the
Consent Calendar as recommended. Item Nos. 8,9, 11, 15, and 19 were pulled for discussion.
Vote: Ayes: James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: None.
5. Approve the minutes from the August 16 City Council meeting.
6. Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Pavable for August 12, 19, and 26 Resolution Nos.
05-144 to 05-146.
7. Adopt resolutions accepting Payroll for August 12 and 26, Resolution Nos. 05-147 and
05-148.
10. Adopt a resolution authorizing the investment of monies in the Local Agencv rnvestment
Fund (LArF), Resolution No. 05-150.
12. Adopt a resolution approving an easement maintenance agreement for Civic Park
Development R-l (Tavlor Woodrow Homes. Inc.), APN 369-40-017, Resolution No. 05-
152.
13. Accept municiDal imDrovements (No documentation in packet):
a) Jia Huo Yu and Shirley K. Ng, 10663 Santa Lucia Road, APN 342-17-008
b) Bin Xu and Chi Zhang, 10465 Byme Avenue, APN 357-12-038
14. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute all necessary
cooperative agreements with the California Department of Transportation required for
design oversight, construction, and maintenance in connection with the Marv Avenue
Bicvcle Footbridge Proiect, Resolution No. 05-153.
16. Adopt a resolution approving the final maD of Tract No. 9729 for Oak Park Village
located on De Anza Boulevard, Resolution No. 05-154.
17. Adopt a resolution approving an imDrovement agreement for CUDertino Estate LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company, 22291 Cupertino Road, APN 326-16-017,
Resolution No. 05-155.
18. Adopt a resolution approving a roadwav easement for CUDertino Estate LLC, a California
Limited Liability Company, 22291 Cupertino Road, APN 326-16-017, Resolution No.
05-156.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 4
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above)
8. Accept the Treasurer's rnvestment and Budget ReDort for July 2005.
Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood clarified how revenues are reported in the
monthly Treasurer's report. WangILowenthal moved and seconded to accept the
Treasurer's Report as presented. The motion carried unanimously.
9. Adopt a resolution accepting the Treasurer and DeDutv Treasurer aDDointments,
Resolution No. 05-149.
Carol Atwood introduced the new Finance Director and Deputy City Treasurer, David
Woo. Lowenthal/Sandoval moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 05-149. The
motion carried unanimously.
11. Adopt a resolution approving an imDrovement agreement for Civic Park Development R-
I (Tavlor Woodrow Homes. Inc.), APN 369-40-017, Resolution No. 05-151.
Staff clarified items in the staff report. Wang/James moved and seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 05-151. The motion carried unanimously.
15. Report on the status of the traffic study in the neighborhood affected by the traffic
restrictions on Kim Street north of Bollinger Road. Set a public hearing for October 4,
2005, for discussion of the traffic report and recommendations on traffic restrictions on
Kim Street north of Bollinger Road and an existing petition for permanent closure of Kim
Street at Bollinger Road.
Public Works Director Ralph Qualls said that no action is expected at this time, but he
asked Council to set a public hearing. Staff will return then with a full traffic report, and
will provide notice to the entire neighborhood.
Leslie Jeffries said that when traffic is not permitted through the Kim gateway, she is
forced to drive around the closure, which adds 10 minutes to her daily commute, and she
must wait at the intersection near the Home Depot where dozens of day workers come by
and knock on the vehicle windows asking for work. She felt this was an unsafe situation,
and she asked the Council to consider adopting an anti-loitering law, and to keep the gate
open permanently.
Robert Hall said he was one of spokespersons representing the 128 homeowners who
signed a petition in favor of the Kim street closure. He said they feel there is adequate
transportation on the main corridors, and the closure helps to reduce the disruption to the
residential area.
Jim Wiant, member of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission, said he applauded the
changes recommended in the General Plan, which add references to pedestrian access.
He recommended that Kim Street be open to both pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 5
Lowenthal/Sandoval moved and seconded to hold the public hearing on October 4, 2005.
The motion carried unanimously.
19. Sister Cities:
a) Approve the Revised Policy and Guidelines for Sister City PartnershiDs
b) Deny the request to pay for hotel accommodations for the Toyokawa and/or
Hsinchu Sister City delegates during the Golden Jubilee Celebration
Council member Richard Lowenthal pointed out a typographical error on page 19(a-3),
second bullet, under the title Travel and Program Expenses, and Council concurred that
the last sentence should actually read, "No disbursements will be made without approval
of City Council." Council also concurred to strike the first sentence under the title New
Affiliations, and have the bullet read, "Cupertino will not establish a relationship with
any foreign city that already has an affiliation in the U.S. The City also will not establish
a relationship with more than one sister city in the same country."
Wang said that there are still areas in the guidelines that need some work, and as the
liaison to the Sister Cities, she asked for more time to discuss the policy with staff. She
also asked that this item not be put on consent in the future to allow for a more full
discussion.
Public Information Officer Rick Kitson noted that it was important that Council hear this
item tonight because of potentially significant expenses in conjunction with the Golden
Jubilee that may be charged to these Sister City accounts, specifically paying for hotel
accommodations for Sister City delegates. Council discussed item 19(b) and noted that
the City does not have a budget to pay for accommodations for the Sister City delegates,
and has never picked up that expense, and that community organizations themselves
would be the ones to pick up that expense if they desired.
LowenthallWang moved and seconded to appoint Council members Kris Wang and
Richard Lowenthal to serve on a subcommittee and to meet with the City Manager on this
item, and report back at the next meeting; also, that staff shall communicate with the
Sister City and explain that a decision has not been made regarding item 19(b), related to
paying for hotel accommodations for delegates. The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Kwok re-ordered the agenda to take up item No. 23 next.
NEW BUSINESS
23. Consider an aDDeal of the City Manager's determination to dismiss the appeal regarding a
window installation at 20272 Northcove Square. The applicants and appellants are David
and Margaret Critzer.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 6
The City Attorney said his recommendation was to refer the matter back to the City
Manager for a hearing. He said that Mr. Eller, who represents the appellant, and Mr.
White, who represents the homeowners association, were in agreement with this
recommendation.
JameslWang moved and seconded not to hear the merits of the appeal at this time because
the merits had not been addressed in the City Manager's appeal hearing, and to refer the
matter back to the City Manager for further hearings on the merits. The motion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
20. General Plan uDdate, Application Nos. GPA-2004-01 and EA-2004-17, City of
Cupertino, Citywide. (This item was continued from the meeting of August 16).
Mayor Patrick Kwok said that at tonight's meeting, Council would focus on the subject of
parks and trails, traffic circulation, and economic development policies, if time allowed.
Community Development Director Steve Piasecki gave the staff report.
Council discussed whether or not the topic of Economic Development Policies should be
removed from the General Plan discussion and brought up to Council as a separate item.
Council member James said for the record that she thought that this topic deserved a full
presentation to the community so that they would understand it, and have a chance to tell
Council how they feel. She said she is only asking that it be taken out of the General Plan
discussion because people don't understand that it's been added in two meetings before
the end of a 4-year process.
JameslKwok moved and seconded to take the Economic Development Policies topic out
of the ongoing General Plan discussion, and bring it separately to Council as a proposed
policy. Council member Wang offered an amendment to have a public hearing on
September 20 on the topic but still include it in the General Plan discussion. James added
a friendly amendment that any hearing would involve mailed notice to all residents.
Kwok seconded the amendment. Wang clarified her amendment to say that the hearing
could be anytime to allow for citywide notice, but she would like it to be on September
20, and that the topic would be heard before voting on the General Plan. James accepted
Wang's amendment and withdrew her friendly amendment. Council voted on whether
there would be Citywide notice for a hearing on Economic Development Policies. The
motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Kwok, Wang, James. Noes: Sandoval and
Lowenthal. Absent: None. Council voted on whether to hold a special public hearing
within the General Plan context on the subject of Economic Development Policies on
September 20. The motion carried unanimously.
Piasecki noted that there might not be time for Citywide notice for the September 20
meeting, but staff would know by next week.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 7
Wang/James moved and seconded that Council would discuss the subject of Economic
Development on September 20 regardless of whether Citywide notice was done or not,
but would not take action until Citywide notice has been given. The motion carried
unanimously.
Leon Pirofalo from Planning Resource Associates commented that the discussion on
circulation impacts was being covered at tonight's meeting as part of the ErR discussion.
He said that another associate at the next meeting would be presenting the rest of the ErR
material. He introduced Bob Harrison, the City's traffic consultant.
Harrison gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding circulation, and highlighted the Level
of Service (LOS) intersections and their impact during morning and afternoon peak hour.
He said the only intersections that didn't make the City LOS standard "D" were
Homestead at De Anza, and Stelling at McClellan Rd. Both would need an additional
right turn lane to bring them up to standard. He said the City couldn't control the
freeways, so they would remain about the same as they are today. Council asked
questions regarding school traffic and new developments. Piasecki responded that staff
would focus traffic analysis in conjunction with any adjacent development to make the
very best condition possible.
Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith reviewed the staff report on parks and trails.
The PowerPoint slides highlighted amended language on Policy 2-70, Strategy 2
regarding trail projects; the Mary A venue Footbridge Study; the BicyclelPedestrian
Commission amended language regarding trail projects; projects to enhance walkability,
including the Mary Avenue Footbridge and the Stevens Creek Trail; and Council options.
Council was in recess from 8:43 p.m. until 9:53 p.m.
The public hearing was opened at 9:53 p.m.
May Koski said she was a member of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission but was
speaking as a resident of Regnart Road. She said that she is a trail advocate, but had
concerns about the open space parks and trails portion of the land use element - Regnart
Creek and West Foothill trails. She said that the General Plan Task Force accepted staff's
recommendation that the trail alignment along the upper portion of Regnart Creek would
be along the road, but now it's not clear that this is what is actually being recommended.
She also wanted to make it clear that the Regnart Creek Trail is actually the Regnart
Creek portion of the Calabasas Creek Trail. She said she also had concerns that the other
new trail elements of the General Plan haven't been subject to public input, noticing, or
planning.
Bob Rodert, resident, said he wanted to keep Cupertino hillsides the way they are when
considering any rezoning in those areas.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 8
Jennifer Griffin asked Council to protect Cupertino schools from overcrowding; keep the
building heights to 35 feet; keep the density of new proposed building projects down;
preserve the view of the hills; preserve the tech parks; preserve the parks, greenbelts,
trees; and purchase more park land.
Geoffrey Paulson, chairman of the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission, said that the
commission is concerned about the constraints of the recent proposed language regarding
the opposite side of the creek. He said that the word "urban" limited the trail, and striking
the language gave more latitude. He also noted that another change the commission
suggested was to propose additional language to the Regnart Creek portion regarding on-
street trails to reflect concerns from residents.
Julia Miyakawa, speaking on behalf of the Regnart Gatekeepers, said that the group has
been fighting the opening of Regnart Creek trail and have already submitted a petition.
She asked the proponents of the trail to think about the residents who will be affected by
the trail 24 hours a day. She said the Gatekeepers are concerned about the safety of
children, legal liability issues, and other concerns already mentioned in previous hearings.
She asked Council to remove the trail from the General Plan, and to not be swayed by
out-of-town special interest groups.
Lisa Giefer, Planning Commissioner, spoke regarding commercial and office space. She
wanted to clarify that the Commission recommended lowering that nurnber by
approximately 500,000 square feet because they felt that the current number seemed
artificially high. The byproduct of lowering the number was an improvement in the
jobslhousing imbalance, but that was not the primary motivation in lowering the number.
As a resident, she urged Council to adopt the amended language proposed by the Bicycle
Pedestrian Commission regarding trails.
Gary Virshup, resident, said that bike and pedestrian trails enhance the quality of life for
everyone in Cupertino. He urged Council to not make it more difficult to add trails by
adding language regarding not allowing trails to be on the opposite side of the creek from
residential development.
Aaron Grossman, Executive Director of the Friends of the Stevens Creek Trail, urged
Council to accept the Bicycle Pedestrian proposed language regarding trails. He also
urged Council to discuss the parking cash out concept where businesses get credit for the
workers that don't drive. He urged Council to study the concerns the residents have
regarding the Regnart Creek Trail, but to not wipe the trail out completely from the
General Plan.
Michael Foulkes, representing the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, said that Policies 2-
20 and 2-42 were short-sighted and would stifle business coming into the City; he asked
Council to consider zoning as a package when talking about a policy of cohesive
commercial centers; and he asked for more discussion regarding 1 % for art, thinking it
was best dealt with on a project to project basis, rather than put into the General Plan.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 9
Anne Ng, resident, asked Counèil to eliminate the restriction of creek trails to the
opposite side of the creek in residential development, and to support the parking cash out
concept with a definition of cash out and a specification that it apply to employers. She
said that she supports the Regnart Creek Trail, but nothing should be done until the
neighborhood supports it.
Council member Wang asked the Chamber of Commerce to look into the impact of cash
out on businesses.
Norm Hackford talked about setbacks in the Crossroads streetscape plan. He said that a
20-foot setback wasn't acceptable to the residents in 2003, and he hasn't heard any
further discussion of this issue. He requested Council to either delete it from the General
Plan or to review it in a public hearing. He was also concerned about adding parking on
Rodrigues, which adds to traffic congestion.
Raj Abhyanker, resident and Cupertino City Council candidate, said he was sadden by the
tensions that have played a part in decisions relating to height, density, setbacks, trails,
cell phone towers, etc. He said he hopes that the facts could be evaluated in the best
interest of the City to maintain the suburban character of the City, and that people can
remain neighbors and friends after the issues have been decided upon.
Ned Britt spoke about school traffic congestion near Faria School. He said it's more than
a 30-minute congestion period, and he's worried about the safety of the children. He
suggested prohibiting circulation in that area instead of just trying to improve it.
Dennis Whittaker, President of the Concerned Citizens of Cupertino (CCC) Save Our
City, and a former member of the General Plan Task Force said he disagreed that
Economic Development policies should not be part of the General Plan. He noted that it
was because of the General Plan Task Force that Economic Development was included in
the discussion. He asked that notification be sent out to all the residents regarding
Economic Development. He mentioned other intersections around the City that need
traffic circulation improvement, and asked for a study regarding how many cars
Cupertino have now versus 10 years ago.
Sara Arzeno, resident and part of the Lindy Lane Development Group, was concerned
about the development of the Lindy Lane hillside. She said that many yards have been
destroyed, and the quality of life has been reduced. She requested to have the area
rezoned to hillside property.
Marty Miller, resident, said that he is an avid use of parks and open space in Cupertino,
and a supporter of trails. He said that all trails aren't worth implementing, and Regnart
Creek is not a good place for a trail. He said it is a ditch, not a trail, and dredged only for
flood control. He explained that the Santa Clara Valley Water District has kept access
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 10
restricted for almost 20 year, to keep people from disturbing it, thereby ensuring its
intended purpose as a flood-control mechanism. A lot of water flows through it during the
rainy season, and the slopes are steep and dangerous, especially for children. He urged
Council to drop Regnart Creek from the General Plan as a potential trail site.
Council member Lowenthal commented that the area is for flood control purposes, but
that the Water District has consistently said they welcome trail use, as long as their trucks
can still get through.
Mike Bullock talked about car parking cash out where employers pay employees an extra
amount each time that they get to work without driving. He said that there is nothing in
what he is advocating that would force any company to choose this policy. He asked for
off-street parking ordinances amended with three items: 1) The definition of car parking
cash out; 2) Schedule of parking lot size reductions as a function of amount paid; 3)
sentence in front of the schedule of reductions making it clear that the reductions would
only apply after the City verified that the expected reductions in driving did take place.
He also said that he is an advocate of trails and agreed with what Ann Ng said.
Deborah Hill encouraged more trails and parks.
The public hearing was closed at 10:47 p.m.
Piasecki explained that the next meeting would focus on the draft Environmental rmpact
Report (ElR), and 1 % for Art.
21. Consider Application No. TM-2005-02, Pinn Bros. Construction (Adobe Terrace) located
at 20128 Stevens Creek Blvd., APN 369-03-001. A tentative map for condominium
purposes for an approved mixed-use project consisting of 2,395 square feet of retail space
and 23 residential units.
Steve Piasecki reviewed the staff report and made a PowerPoint presentation.
Kris Wang commented that when Council first reviewed the project for approval on
March 1,2005, the application was to provide rental units on one single parcel, and now
it is being changed to sub-divide the parcel into 23 different units. She said this is
contradictory to the Heart of the City Plan under the section of MuIti-Unit Residential
Development Standards. The Plan calls for mixed-use and any un-subdivided parcels that
are then sub-divided, must be for mixed-use or they are not qualified to be in the Heart of
the City.
Piasecki noted that the staff report on March 1 said the project was for 23 residential
condominium units, and pointed out that the applicant had noted that the project had
changed from an apartment project to an ownership condominium project at that time.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 11
Jeff Curran, Pinn Brothers, said that the reason for the delay in bringing the Tentative
Map to Council was that they were waiting for a purchase agreement, which would allow
them to sell the 23 units.
Dennis Whittaker asked staff to clarify whether the project was one entity, as a
condominium association, or 23 separate units of ownership, as a townhouse association.
He said that it is a different project if the units are now divided into townhouses, and it
should go back to the Planning Commission for further discussion.
Curran clarified that the 23 units would not 23 separate parcels but only one lot; it is a
condominium project; and the retail parcel user would also be a member of the
condominium association.
Mayor K wok stated for the record that he did not vote to approve this project because it
took away some of the retail and changed it into residential, but he would support the
Tentative Map sub-division request.
Sandoval/Lowenthal moved and seconded to approve Tentative Map TM-2005-02 in
accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 6311. The motion carried
unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
22. Consider adopting a resolution supporting Assemblv Bill 438, as amended, (Parra) sex
offenders, Resolution No. 05-157.
Sandoval/James moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 05-157 and authorize the
Mayor to send letters of support to state legislators and staff. The motion carried
unanimously.
23. Consider an aDDeal of the City Manager's determination to dismiss the appeal regarding a
window installation at 20272 Northcove Square. The applicants and appellants are David
and Margaret Critzer.
This item was heard earlier in the meeting.
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 12
24. Receive the resignation from Fine Arts Commissioner Martha Bills, and initiate the
process to fill the unscheduled vacancy.
Council concurred to include this vacancy in the annual recruitment process.
25. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1966: "An Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 14.04, Section 14.04.230 of the Cupertino
Municipal Code Relating to Street Improvement Requirements, Exception Based On Less
Than Twenty-Five Percent Expansion of Existing Floor Area."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Lowenthal/James moved and seconded to
read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the
first reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval, Wang. Noes:
None. Absent: None.
26. Conduct the first reading or Ordinance No. 1967: "An Ordinance of the City Council of
the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 9.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code -
Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, Revising Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Requirements for Land Development Projects."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. LowenthallWang moved and seconded to
read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the
first reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval, Wang. Noes:
None. Absent: None.
ORDINANCES - None
STAFF REPORTS - None
COUNCIL REPORTS
Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:29 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to Wednesdav. SeDtember 14 at 6:00 D.m. for a
meeting regarding the General Plan, Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre Avenue,
Cupertino, CA 95014.
~k
Kimberly Smit
September 6, 2005
Cupertino City Council
Page 13
For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at
www.cupertino.org.Click on Agendas & Minutes/ City Council/ Packets.
Most Council meetings are shown live on Cable Channel 26, and are available at your
convenience from our web site. Visit www.cuDertino.org and click on Watch Meetings.
Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City
Channel, 777-2364.