PC Summary 11-22-05
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue, Curertino, California 95014 408 777-3308
To:
Mayor and City Council Members
From:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development
Date:
November 28, 2005
Subj:
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS MADE
November 22, 2005
Chapter 19.32 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for
a eal of decisions made b the Plannin Commission
1. Application
TM-2005-10, INT-2005-01; Dipesh Gupta, 10752 S Stelling Road
Description
Tentative Map to subdivide a 20,473 net square foot parcel into 2 parcels ranging
from 7,387 square feet to 7,390 square feet
Interpretation to define the front yard as Jollyman Lane for a future single family
residence in accordance with section 19.08.030 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
Action
The Planning Commission approved the application on a 5 - 0 vote.
The ten-calendar day appeal will expire on December 2, 2005.
Enclosures:
Planning Commission Report of November 22, 2005
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6339 & 6340
Approved Plan Set
2. Application
TM-2005-12, INT -2005-02; Dipesh Gupta, 10758 S Stelling Road
Description
Tentative Map to subdivide a 22,566 net square foot parcel into 2 parcels of
approximately 7,486 square feet to 8,744 square feet
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Property Location:
TM_2005-10,INT-2005-0l Agenda Date: November 22, 2005
Dipesh Gupta
Manish Gupta DBA Shashi, LLC
10752 Stelling Road
Application Summary:
TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide a 20,473 square foot lot into two parcels (7,387 and
7,390 square feet in size) in a Rl-6 zoning district.
INTERPRETATION to allow the front yard of the lot at the corner of S. Stelling Road
and Jollyman Lane to change from Stelling Road to Jollyman Lane.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the tentative map, file
number TM-2005-10 and the interpretation request, file no. INT-2005-01, in accordance
with the model resolutions.
Project Data:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Total Acreage (gross):
Net Acreage per parcel:
Density:
Low Density Residential, 1-5 DUj gr. acre
Rl-6
20,473 square feet
Lot 2- 7,387.47 sq. ft., Lot 2- 7,390.39 sq. ft.
4.26 duj gr. acre.
Environmental Assessment:
Yes
Yes
Categorically exempt.
Project Consistency with: General Plan:
Zoning:
BACKGROUND:
The project site is located on the northeast corner of S. Stelling Road and Jollyman Lane
at 10752 S. Stelling Road. The lot lacks curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements.
An existing house and storage building are located toward the rear of the lot with
driveway access taken from the southeast corner of the lot. Surrounding land uses are
predominantly single-family residential uses with the exception of the Redeemer
Lutheran Church located to the south of the property.
DISCUSSION:
Zoning and General Plan Conformance:
At 7,387.47 and 7,390.39 net square feet, both proposed lots are consistent with the
zoning designation of Rl-6. The residential density at 4.26 d.u'; gross acre is also
consistent with the general plan land use designation.
~l -I
November 22,2005
TM_2005_10,INl-2005-01
Page 2
Trees on site:
The lot is heavily treed, but most of the trees are ornamental or fruit trees. A total of
fifteen trees exist on the project parcel. The City's consultant arborist, Barrie D. Coates
and Associates, conducted a tree survey (Exhibits A and B). The survey indicates that
there are four specimen trees located on the property, of which two are good specimens
and two are fair specimens. The two trees that are fair specimens could be replaced with
tree replacements as deemed appropriate by the City's arborist with the approval of the
Director of Community Development. Staff recommends that the two good specimens
(Trees 5 and 8) be retained as protected trees on the site.
Number and Tvpe Condition Recommendation Notes
#5 Deodar Cedar Good Retain Located on edge of sewer and storm drain
easement. Since trenching close to the tree
may damage the tree, consider alternatives
such as:
a.) Retain tree with Cupertino Sanitary
Departments agreement and arborist
confirmation that easement and
trenching will not affect tree
b.) Narrower easement with root barrier
measures to prevent damage to tree or
sewer lines
c.) Easement agreement between applicant
and property owner of 10758 S. Stelling
to have easement on their property
d.) If alternatives not viable, viability of
relocation should be looked at prior to
considering replacement
#8 Blue Atlas Cedar Good · Located along the southern property line
Retain
· Should be retained since no concrete
development plans
· When development plans are presented,
staff with the approval of the Director of
Community Development . shall
determine relocation or replacement
oPtions
#7 Deodar Cedar Fair Replace or retain Located along the southern property line.
Replacements:
· Two 48" box and One 36" box specimens
or
· Five 36" box specimens
#10 Deodar Cedar Fair Replace or retain Located along the southern property line.
Replacements:
· One 48" box and one 24" box specimens
or
· Two 36" box and two 24" box specimens
#3 and #4 Coast Fair Retain Located at the Northwestern corner of the
Redwood property. These are fairly large and healthy.
. Need to be irrigated throughout
construction.
G: IPlanninglP DREPO R Tipc TMreports 12005 tmreports \ TM- 2005-/ O. doc
4-,;?
TM_2005_10,INT_2005_01
Page 3
November 22, 2005
.
Also located in proposed drainage
easement.
Consider same alternatives as for Tree
#5.
.
Located at the Southwestern corner of the
ro er . 20' estimated hei ht.
#2 Samuel Sommer Good
Ma olia
Retain
Interpretation:
For the corner lot, the zoning ordinance requires the S. Stelling Road frontage (the
shorter side) to the front yard, since it is the shorter lot line abutting a street. This
determines the building setbacks from the property line and the building footprint of
the lot. It is logical to consider the Jollyman Lane frontage as the front yard. However,
to do so requires a Planning Commission interpretation.
During the initial staff review of the subdivision, staff and the applicant came to the
conclusion that interpreting the Jollyman Lane as the front yard would give the
applicant a more consistent street frontage on Jollyman Lane since they plan to develop
and build (in conjunction with the property adjacent to this one) three homes on
Jollyman Lane. If this interpretation is not approved, this property could potentially be
built as close as 12' from the property line while the house next to it will be located 20'
from the property line. This would give an inconsistent look to the street frontage on
Jollyman Lane. Also, this interpretation will allow the applicant greater flexibility in
retaining the specimen trees located on the property.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing a 20' setback on the S. Stelling Road frontage as
well with front entry elements such as an entry way or a wrap around porch to
maintain a street front look. This has been included as a condition of approval so that
the street frontage along S. Stelling Road remains consistent as well. The proposed
interpretation also gives the applicant the option of a larger rear yard for use.
Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Assistant Planner ... .
Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development < S~-J? ~,>4;)QúL!
c. ~.J
Enclosures: Model Resolution for TM-2005-10, INT -2005-01
Exhibit A: Tree Survey & Arborist Report for 10752 S. Stelling Road
Exhibit B: Addendum to Tree Survey
Plan Set
G: ¡PlanninglP DREPOR Tipc TMreports 12005 tmreports 1 TM- 200 5-/ O. doc
J.f-3
TM-2005-10
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 20,473 NET SQUARE FOOT
PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS OF APPROXIMA TEL Y 7,387 AND 7,390 SQUARE
FEET AT 10752 S. STELLING ROAD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
TM-2005-10
Dipesh Gupta, dba Shashi, LLC
10752 S. Stelling Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning
Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino
General Plan.
b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent
with the General Plan.
c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development
contemplated under the approved subdivision.
d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage nor injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat.
e) That the designs of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated
therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application TM-2005-10 for a Tentative Map is hereby
approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
page 2 thereof, and
J.f-t-f
Resolution No.
Page 2
TM-200S-10
November 22, 2005
That the subconc1usions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application TM-2005-10, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of
November 22, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The approval is based on exhibits titled: "Shashi, LLC, Two lot subdivision,
10752 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 2 sheets, dated October 19,
2005, labeled C1 and C3 dated November 08, 2005, except as may be amended by
the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. DEMOLITION
The applicant is required to demolish existing structures in accordance with City
demolition procedures.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERV ATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS:
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. SOUTH STELLING ROAD ELEVATION
The applicant shall design the elevation of the future house developed on the lot
at the corner of S. Stelling Road and Jollyman Lane in a manner that will keep the
look along Stelling Road consistent with the existing elevations along the street
since many houses front onto it. The elements that may be incorporated include a
front entry porch, a wrap around porch that wraps around the front of the house
to maintain a street front look.
5. COVENANT FOR TREE PROTECTION
The applicant shall prepare and record a covenant that runs with the land, prior
to final map approval, acknowledging the protective status of the two Cedars,
the two redwoods and the Southern Magnolia, notifying future property owners
of the kinds and numbers of trees protected by City Ordinance and the
requirement for a tree removal permit for these trees. The covenant shal1'be
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
G: \Plann inglP DREPO R TiRES12005\ TM-2005-1 0 res. doc
tf;5
Resolution No.
Page 3
TM-2005-10
November 22, 2005
-----
In the event that any trees need to be relocated or removed due to required
improvements, a tree removal application may be made to the Director of
Community Development.
6. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant, prior to approval of the final map, shall provide a tree protection
bond in the amount of $30,000 to ensure protection of existing trees on the site.
The bond shall be returned after recordation of the final map, subject to a letter
from the City arborist is indicating that the trees are in good condition.
7. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING
Applicant shall comply with the policies in the City's Below Market Rate
Housing Manual.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
8. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
9. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in
accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
10. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
11. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Fire, if needed.
12. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or
Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
13. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Pre- and post development calculations shall be submitted to the City. Runoff
shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
14. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
G: IPlanning IP DREPOR TiRESI2005 ITM-2005-1 0 res. doc
*-&,
Resolution No.
Page 4
TM-200S-10
November 22, 2005
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of
the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
15. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for
undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
Fees:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
d. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee
schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein
may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a
building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at
that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
$ 5% of Off-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,130.00 minimum
$ 6% of On-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,000.00 minimum
$1,000.00
TBD
NjA
$ 3,250.00
$ 31,500.00
By Developer
a. Checking & Inspection Fees:
b. Grading Permit:
16. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located
underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
17. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES
The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances
installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for
water service to the subject development.
18. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP
plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion
and or sediment control plan shall be provided.
G.. IPlanningIPDREPORTiRES\2005ITM-2005-1 0 res. doc
'-1--1
Resolution No.
Page 5
TM-200S-10
November 22, 2005
------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF
ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 California Government Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV of
this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices.
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \Planning!P DREPOR TiRESI2005 ITM-2005-1 0 res. doc
y--e,
INT-2005-01
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN INTERPRET A TION OF FRONT YARD FACING JOLL YMAN LANE FOR
A FUTURE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 19.08.030 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an
interpretation, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) That design relationships with adjacent yards and buildings, and the protection of
specimen trees would be improved by interpreting the front yard as facing Hillcrest Road
as shown in the below referenced drawing; and
2) That design relationships would be improved by interpreting them consistently with the
existing neighborhood design and lot orientation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for an interpretation is hereby recommended for
approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page
2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. INT-2005-
01 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005 and
are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein.
4-4
Resolution No.
Page-2-
INT-2005-02
November 22, 2005
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Location:
INT-2005-02
Dipesh Gupta (Shashi LLC)
Leroy & Beatrice May
10758 S. Stelling Road
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "Shashi LLC, Two lot
Subdivision, 10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA." consisting of one sheet labeled C2,
except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: IPlanninglP D REPOR TiRES120051JNT-2005 -02.doc
q-ro
BARRIE O. COATE
and ASSOCIATES
HorncwuœICon~~nœ
23535 Summit Road
Los Gatos. CA 95033
408l35~ 1052
RECEIVED OCT 1 7 2005
EXHIBIT A
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE
SHASm LLC. SUBDMSION SITE
10752.10758 S. STELLING ROAD
CUPERTINO
Prepared at the request of:
Colin Jung
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Prepared by:
Michael L. Bench
Consulting Arborist
September 22nd, 2005
Job # 09-05-193
+JI
£')(. H I B I r A
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE SHASHllLC, SUBDIVISION SITE, 10752, 10758 S. STELLING ROAD. CUPERTINO 1
Assignment
I was asked by Colin Jung, City of Cupertino, to evaluate the trees located at Shashi LLC,
Subdivision Site, 10752, 10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, California.
The plan provided for this evaluation is the Tentative Map prepared by Criterium-Decker Engineers,
San Jose, Califomia, Sheet A, dated 8-25-04. It displayed the existing conditions at the site. No plan
showing proposed construction was provided.
Summary
There are 26 trees included in this inventory. Of these 26 trees, 18 are located on this property, and 8
trees are located on the property toward the north on Orline Court.
The trees at this site protected by the City of Cupertino are Trees # 5, 7, 8, and 10.
However, I recommend that the 8 Italian cypress trees located on the neighboring property be treated
as protected trees.
Because we do not have plans showing proposed construction on site, a comprehensive tree
protection plan cannot be provided. However, suggested precautions are provided for the
preservation of the neighboring 8 Italian cypress trees and general tree preservation
recommendations, as well as suggested mitigation for underground utilities.
Observations
There are a total of 26 trees included in this tree inventory. Of these, 18 are located on these two
parcels (Blasquez Family Trust, APN 359-22-061 and May Family Trust, APN 359-22-060)
proposed for a new subdivision. In addition to these, there are 8 trees located in a row adjacent to the
property boundary on the north side of the May Family Trust Site. Some of these 26 trees were not
shown on the map provided and have been added. The locations of these added trees are estimated
using visual references only. The attached map shows the locations of all 26 trees and their
approximate canopy dimensions.
The 26 trees are classified as follows:
Tree # I - Fruitless mulbeny (Morus alba)
Tree # 2 - Samuel Sommer Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora 'Samuel Sommer ')
Trees # 3, 4, 16 - Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens)
Trees # 5, 7,10 -Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara)
Tree # 6 - Victorian box (Pittosporum undulatum)
Tree # 8 - Blue atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica 'Glauca ')
Tree # 9 -Italian stone pine (Pinus pinea)
Tree # II - Australia bush cheny (Syzygium paniculatum)
Tree # 12 - Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
Trees # 13, 14, 15-Siberian elm (Ulmuspumila)
Tree # 17 - Califomia black walnut (Juglans hindsii)
Tree # 18 - Apricot (Prunus armeniaca)
Tree # 19 -Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens): This number represents 8
specimens that are essentially identical for all practical purposes.
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"", 2005
¡..f -( ;)..
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE SHASllllLC. SUBDiVISION SITE, 10752. 10758 S. STELLING ROAD, CUPERTINO 2
The particulars of these trees (species, trunk diameter, height, spread, and structure) are included in
the attachments that follow this text.
The health and structure of each specimen is rated on a scale of 1-5 (Excellent - Extremely poor) on
the data sheets attached to this text. Based on these health and structure ratings combined, I have
given each tree an overall condition rating as follows:
Excellent
S ecimens
9,12,19
Good
S ecimens
2,5,6,8,
16
Fair
S cimens
1,3,4,7,
10, II, 13,
14, 15 17
18
Poor
S cimens
Comments about Specific Trees
Trees # 1,7,10,13,14, and 15 have been "topped". This very poor pruning procedure causes trees
to produce water waterspouts, which are inherently weak and prone to failure. "Topping" also forces
greater energy to be diverted to side branches, which become longer and heavier than they would
have become nonnally. This makes these side branches also prone to failure. For these reasons, the
branching structures is of these trees is poor.
Tree # 17 is a large California black walnut (Jug/ans hindsii). The south half of the canopy is very
sparse and contains considerable dead wood. The north half of the canopy is relatively dense and
vigorous. Thus, the overall condition rating is only Fair.
Tree # 19 represents a row of 8 Italian cypress trees (Cupressus sempervirens). These trees are
located within I foot of the north side property boundary on the neighboring property.
If any of the Coast redwood Trees # 3, 4, or 16 would be preserved during construction, they would
likely decline ifthey are not irrigated throughout the construction period.
Protected Trees
The City of Cupertino (Chapter 14.18)" fmds that the preservation of specimen and heritage trees on
private and public property, and the protection of all trees during construction, is necessary for the
best interests of the City and of the citizens and the public thereof." The City "finds it is in the public
interest to enact regulations controlling the care and removal of specimen and heritage trees..." A
"Heritage Tree" means "any tree or grove of trees which, because off actors, but not limited to, its
historic value, unique quality, girth, height or species, has been found by the Architectural and Site
Approval Committee to have a special significance to the community." A "Specimen tree" means any
of the following:
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"", 2005
tf-(3
EVALUATION OF lREES AT THE SHASHI u.c, SUBDIVISION SITE, 10752. 10758 S. STELLING ROAD, CUPERTINO 3
Soecies Measurement from Single Trunk Multi-Trunk
Natural Grade Diameter/Circumference Diameter/Circumference
Oak trees; 4 'h feet 10 inches D (31 inches C) 20inchesDI'63 inches C)
California Buckeve
Bil! LeafManle; 4 'h feet 12 inches D (38 inches C) 25 inchesr>779 inches C)
Deodar Cedar;
Blue Atlas Cedar
The trees at this site protected by the City of Cupertino are Trees # 5, 7, 8, and 10.
Although the 8 neighboring Italian cypress trees, represented by # 19, are not defined as specimen
trees, I recommend that these trees be protected because of their importance as a partial screen
between these two properties.
Risks to Trees by Proposed Construction
Ifany earth work (excavation, trenching, grading) were to be done within 6 feet of the trunks of the 8
Italian cypress trees (# 19), their root systems may be damaged.
If any underground utilities are to be replaced or upgraded, it will be essential that the location of
trenches be planned prior to construction and those locations are shown on plans, and that the
trenches be dug at the locations shown on the plans.
If utilities would be installed underground, it would be essential that the trenches must be located a
minimum distance of 5 times the trunk diameter from the trunks of trees provided all other sides of
the root zones of these trees would not be compromised by grading.
It is likely that the protected trees at this site would be at risk of damage by construction or
construction procedures that are common to most construction sites. These procedures may include
the dumping or the stockpiling of materials over root systems, may include the trenching across the
root zones for utilities or for landscape irrigation, or may include construction traffic across the root
system resulting in soil compaction and root die back.
Recommendations
The plans for the proposed new development have not been provided for this tree survey. For this
reason, it is not possible to access the impact to the protected trees at this site or to provide a Tree
Protection plan for their survival.
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"", 2005
tf-¡if
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE SHASIll LLC. SUBDIVISION SITE. 10752, 10758 S. STELLING ROAD. CUPERTINO 4
However, I recommend that no earth work (excavation, trenching, grading, etc.) must be done within
6 feet of the trunks of the 8 Italian cypress trees (# 19).
Respectfully submitted,
.......
Michael L. Bench, Associate
~$~
Barrie D. Coate, Principal
MLB/sh
Enclosures:
Map
Tree Protection Infonnation
Typical Standard Footing Infonnation
Glossary
Tree Charts pages I - 2
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"", 2005
H--/5
BARRIE D. COATE
and ASSOCIATES
Horticutural Consultants
23535 SlJmmit Road
Los GatOS. CA 95033
4081353-1052
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. Any legal description provided to the appraiser/consultant is assumed to be correct.
No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character nor is any opinion rendered as to
the quality of any title,
2. The appraiser/consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for accuracy of
information provided by others.
3. The appraiser/consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason
of this appraisal unless subsequent written arrangements are made, including payment of an
additional fee for services,
4. Loss or removal of any part of this report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation.
5, Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for anr
purpose by any other than the person(s) to whom it is addressed without written consent 0
this appraiser/consultant.
6. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the
appraiser/consultant, and the appraiser's/consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the
reporting of a specified value nor upon any finding to be reported,
7, Sketches, diagrams, graphs, photos, etc" in this report, being intended as visual aids, are
not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys.
8. This report has been made in conformity with acceptable appraisal/evaluation/diagnostic
reporting techniques and procedures, as recommended by the International Society of
Arboriculture.
9. When applying any pesticide, fungicide, or herbicide, always follow label instructions,
lO.No tree described in this report was climbed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take
responsibility for any defects which could only have been discovered by climbing. A full root
collar inspection, consisting of excavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root collar
and major buttress roots, was not performed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take
responsibility for any root defects which could only have been discovered by such an
inspection.
CONSULTING ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to
examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to
reduce risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations
of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.
Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often
hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or
safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time, Likewise, remedial treatments,
like medicine, cannot be guaranteed.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some
degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
dJtlhJÙf. ~ ~
Barrie D, Coate
ISA Certified Arborist
Horticultural Consultant
I-Hit,
BARRIE D. COATE AND ASSOCIATES
Horticultural Consultants
(lI-08) 353-1052
Fax (lI-08) 353-1238
23535 Summit Rd. Los Gatos, CA 95033
TREE PROTECTION BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION
These are general recommendations
And may be superseded by site-specific instructions
BEFORE
Plan location of trenching to avoid all possible cuts beneath tree canopies. This includes trenches
for utilities, irrigation lines, cable TV and roof drains.
Plan construction period fence locations which will prevent equipment travel or material storage
beneath tree canopies.
Install fences before any construction related equipment is allowed on site. This includes pickup
trucks.
Inform subcontractors in writing that they must read this document. Require return of signed
copies to demonstrate that they have read the document.
Prune any tree parts, which conflict with construction between August and January. Except for
pines which may be pruned between October-January. Only an ISA certified arborist, using
¡SA pruning instructions may be used for his work. If limbs are in conflict with the
construction equipment before the certified arborist is on-site, carpenters may cut off
offending parts of 6" diameter or less, leaving an 18" long stub, which should be re-cut later
by the arborist.
Under no circumstances may any party remove more than 30% of a trees foliage, or prune so
that an unbalanced canopy is created.
DURING
A void use of any wheeled equipment beneath tree canopies.
Maintain fences at original location in vertical, undamaged condition until all contractors and
subcontractors, including painters are gone.
Clear root collars of retained trees enough to leave 5-6 buttress roots bases visible at 12" from
the trunk.
Irrigate trees adjacent to construction activity during hot months (June-October). Apply 10
gallons of water per I" oftrunk diameter (measured at 4 Y,') once per 2 week period by
soaker hose. Apply water at the dripline, or adjacent to construction not around the trunk.
Apply mulch to make a 3" deep layer in all areas beneath tree canopies and inside fences. Any
organic material which is non toxic may be used.
AFTER
Irrigate monthly with I 0 gallons of water per I" of trunk diameter with a soaker hose, placed just
inside the dripline. Continue until 8" of rain has fallen.
Avoid cutting irrigation trenches beneath tree canopies.
Avoid rototilling beneath tree canopies since that will destroy the small surface roots which
absorb water.oA void installation ofturf or other frequently irrigated plants beneath tree canopies.
t-[---'17
31
BARRIE D, COATE
AND ASSOCIATES
Horticultural Consultants
(4-08) 353-1052
23535 Summit Road
Los Gatos, CA 95033
II ! I
! I
U
. .
. ~
Typical Rebar
Majority Of Roots
Severed At Edge
Of Trench
(All Roots Outside
Of Trench Die)
Pier and On-Grade Footing
.
Typical Reba~ IJ
Existing .
Grade '.. .'
, . .
//7~~J'{. . :', ~:U . ~. W~:'~ :¡¡ll~E·~.~~·;·· ~~š§:
§!@:t:'~ .. '. . ~/!'I~j~ ,~: ~/lIJ ~if!l~ . '"~/
///K~' I . : 7i/~l/ï ~7µ1 '.' F'/'h~r;--'j '~" I !!l~:~.
-/ . -,....: _. /, I,. /. -/1' I._~. _/,..
-=- 'Il/~., /lm-;:::::-J:IL?->f<frj.~.J"J' '- . -........ T"'"" "/P7~.,
- 11/. :::::::..//. ~/IP--:::'1IJI. :SItt, :o::.:/II¡o~·' ,I./I¡'=r-'II, .(.:::
~ Roots are Sever~d I
Only at Pier LOC~ J
Concrete Spans (typical)
Must Be On-Top
of Existing Grade.
l
Concrete
Footing
Existing
Grade
- .
, .... þ .", ... \ "
., r
. .
J-f -I '6
11
BARRIE D. COATE AND ASSOCIATES
Horticultural Consultants
(408) 353-1052
Fax (.1 .08) 353-1238
23535 Summit Rd. Los Gatos, CA 95033
GLOSSARY
Co-domin3nt (stems, branches) equal in size and relative importance, usually associated with
either the trunks or stems, or scaffold limbs (branches) in the crown.
Crown _ The portion of a tree above the trunk including the branches and foliage.
Cultivar _ A named plant selection from which identical or nearly identical plants can be
produced, usually by vegetative propagation or cloning.
Decurrent _ A term used to describe a mature tree crown composed of branches lacking a central
leader resulting in a round-headed tree.
Excurrent _ A term used to describe a tree crown in which a strong central leader is present to
the top of a tree with lateral branches that progressively decrease in length upward from the base.
Girdling root - A root that partially or entirely encircles the trunk and/or large buttress roots,
which could restrict growth and downward movement of photosynthates.
Included bark _ Bark which is entrapped in narrow-angled attachments of two or more stems,
branches, or a stem and branch(es). Such attachments are weakly attached and subject to splitting
out.
Kinked root - A taproot or a major root(s) which is sharply bent and can cause plant instability
and reduction of movement of water, nutrients, and photosynthates.
Root collar _ The flared, lower portion of the base of a tree where the roots and stem merge.
Also referred to as the "root crown".
Leader - The main stem or trunk that forms the apex of the tree.
Stem _ The axis (trunk of a central leader tree) ofa plant on which branches are attached.
Temporary branches - A small branch on the trunk or between scaffold branches retained to
shade, nourish, and protect the trunk of small young trees. These branches are kept small and
gradually removed as the trunk develops.
Definition of Woody Parts
Trunk _ The main stem of a tree between the ground and the lowest scaffold branch.
Scaffold branches -In decurrent trees, the branches that form the main structure of the crown.
Limb - A major structural part.
Branch - A smaller part, attached to a limb or scaffold branch.
Branchlet - A small part, attached to a branch.
Twig - A very small part attached to a branchlet.
Leaf - The main photosynthetic organ of most plants.
l..HQ
~c-c....
!if8-8-
=",z
g>'f'~
"0 <:> a>
CD <¡n"
3...<n
<7",:T
a> W 0>
, !3-
'" -.
'" ,...
::> ,...
_0. 0
'"
8
01
...
II
W
a>
"U J!!.
0> 01
ra II
a>
... :¡:
0 0
- û!
N -
~-'"
T I : I I , , I , : -i
, I I I I
I I . I , I , , I I ãJ
,... I", ICD I-..¡ 10) 101 I..,. I", I", ,
10 ,... CD
, I I , I I , I .
, , , , I I I I I I 'It ~
, , , , , . 1 , 1 ,
, , , , , , , ,
iál :Þ. Ii[ C) :92 Ii: ~ IS; C) '0 ¡g l 'C) rn ~!g> ~ ."
:0 ~ 'c: Hit ~ iR ig 12
'0 0::: ,-. ICD '0> t '§13 ~ Ia:
10. ,0> IS!!. 5 1!{1
'" ,::> 'J> l:::t· &iäi im
10> ~·i~ '" I", 10> ~ .0> '" 10> 1::0 ¡¡;. !::o ~ !:
" 0> 10> \' Iw ~ " ..,- I'" ~
'C) I¡;;> '0 '.. ... '9:(J)
111> .. ,0 1;f I'" 10 :a> i§ æ If{ IS: "U ~
0> ,::> :¡ '0 0> iiï it! =-
'0. I" '0 '0. ,,. ¡g ~13 15. 2!i!
10> :0 a> 10> .g :8 2- ~t! ~ >-
I"U ~ § 0> 9::3 '<7
" '0. , , :.. U> ,.,.,
, ,-. '0> ii! '0. .. '0. "".. Z ¡j¡ Ô
,::I 0> ê- ~ - !' C
\CD I.... S I ~h 0> ~= ~
· <Q , , is:
, , ¡;; , ¡;; ¡¡¡' , 3 ~ @ 1'"'1 1'"'1
, , , , cñ:m ~l
, , 0::: , 2' :0 , .. ~ :;: 0
, . , , ..""
· , @ , 3 '" , 31::1 .... ~
, , , .
, , , , 0:::,0 ,.,.,
, , , , (DI= U>
, , , , -Iw ,.,.,
, , , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
'... :... '... I~ ,'" ,'" '... , ,'"
I.... '.... !-.J ,.... :m I"" !O) lID 'N DIAMETER @ 4-1/2 FEET
, ---.¡,.-- , , , ,
---+--- ---+--- ---+---- ---..--- ------ ---01--- ---...--- ------+--- ---...--- ---------------------------------------
I.c.. , ..<.. , I.c.. , I.c.. , , :.c.. MUL TI-SYSTEM
-~-+--- , , , ,
-f--- ---f--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- ---j--- --+--- -----+-- --+--- ---------------------------------------
, , '... , , , , , , , ;;:
I.... I 10 1 !m , I'" I , :...
, , CD
:tñ , ,- , , I.... , , 10 DBH
, I"" , , , , , ..
, , , , , , , , , --------------------------------------. ( J
--.--- ------ ---.--- ------ -.........- ..----- ........-_.. ---......... ---....--- .........---
, , , , , , , , , , c:
, , , , , , ,... , , , ii1
~ , '.... , :~ , I~ , , ,
, . , I , ,
:.... , !~ , :.... , '... , , , 3
, , · :0 , , , DBH
· , , I , , , , , CD
, , I , , , , , I -------------------------------------- ::s
---,.-~... --.,..--- ---,.--- --.,..--- ---"1--- ---r-"''' ---'1-_. ---r--- --"'--""1""-- ---r---
, , , , , , , , , I IAMETER @ 2 FEET iii'
I , , , , , , , , ,
· , , . , , , , , ,
---4--... --.........- ---.1--- --....--- -...-~--- --........... ---.1--- ---1---- ----_..&._- ---1.---
I.... :... :... 101 IN :.... 1m 1m IN :... HEIGHT ESTIMATED
'0 '01 '01 '0 '01 '0 '0 '0 '0 '01
---t--- __-1..___ ---f--- --+--- ---i--- ---1---" ---i--- --+--- -----+-- ---~--- --------------------------------------
,
'w 'N 'w '.... 'N '.... 'N !~ 'N 'w SPREAD ESTIMATED
'01 '01 '01 '0 ,0, '0 '01 '01 '0
, , , , · I , , , , _f!~~~~f!_~~::s)______________________
,... ,... ,... ,... ,~ :N :N IW IN ,...
, , , , , ,
---f--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- ---t--- ---~--- ---i--- ---~--- -----+-- ---~--- C)
:.... :... :N I.... IN I... :W IN :... I.... _~~~_l!~~l!_~~_~!:~2________________ 0
, l..n.J,...__ , , I , · , , , ::s
---+--- ---+..-- ------ .........--- ...--..--- ..--4--- ---........ -------- ___ o___ Q.
, I , , , , , , , , ~
, , , I , · , , , , CONDITION RATING (2-10)
, l..__+___ . , , , · , , , õ
---f--- ---f--- --+--- ---t--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- -----+-- ---~--- -------------------------------------- ::s
, , I , , I , · , I HAZARD RATING (4-12)
, I I , , , , · , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , · , · , , · CROWN CLEANING
I , I , , , , , , · ~
, , . , , , , , , , ---------------------------------------
....-,.--- --....--- ---,.--- --..,.--- ---,--- ---r---- ---,--- ---1"'--- -----.,..-- ---1"'---
, , , , · , , , , , CROWN THINNING
, , , , , , , , , , 2-
, , , , , , · , , ,
--.....--.. __..L...__ ---.1.--- -..-'---- .......1--- ---'--.... ---.I...... ---1...-- ----.......-- ___L___ --------------------------------------- ::s
, , , , , , , · , ,
, , , , , , , , , , CROWN RESTORATION IE!.
I- I , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , I , , ,- n
---..0 --...,...--- ---'1--- .......... ---,,--- --_ro--- ...--.,--- ---1"'--- -----1--- ---10 --------------------------------------
¡g , , '0 , · , , , ¡g CROWN RAISING ..
· , ¡:g · , , , , !2:
I , , , , , ,
---{a> --+--- ---f--- ----1m ---f--- --+--- ---i--- ---~--- -----+-- ___I CD -------------------------------------- S-
,0. , , 10. , , , , , :0. REMOVE END-WEIGHT
, , , , , , I , , ra
, · , __-101 , , · , , I
.....-.--- ------ ---.--- ---..--- ---¡.--- ..--..--- _"_Þ<___ -------- ---¡.--- -------------------------------------- Z
, , , ,- , I , · , ,
, , , :01 , , , , , , CABLES NEEDED # ..
, , , , , I · · I ..
-t--- --+-- ---f--- --- Q ---t--- -+--- ---j--- , -----+-- ---~--- --------------------..-----------------
---r--- 0.
· , , , , , , , · , PRUNING PRIORITY (1-5) ( J
, , , , ! I , , , ,
, · , · , , , ,
, , : , , : : , I ,
,
, , , , , I , , , , "
, , I , , , , , , , INSECTS (1-5)
, , I , , I , , · CD
I , I , , , , I , , ~
---.--- --.....--- ---.--- -.---- ---.--- ___to__· ---..-_. ---:---- -----....-- ---1---- ---.-.--------...-----...-...--------...------
, , , , , , , , ,
· , , , , , I , , I TREE CROWN DISEASE (1-5)
, ~---I---- . I , , , , , I C
---f--- ---f--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- ---t--- --+--- -----+-- --+--- ----.---------...----------------------- iii'
, , , , , , , I , , DEAD WOOD (1-5) a>
I , , , · , , , · ,
, ___.l.___ , , , · , , , , ..
---+--- ---+--- --.....-.- ----1-..- --.....--- ----1--- ---1---- -...----+--- ---1---- .---------...--------...------...----------- ..
· , , · , , · , , ,
I , I , , , , , , , TRUNK DECAY(1-5) CD
, , , , , , , · , ,
, , , , , , , , , , "
---T--- --....--- ---T-·" --..,.--- ---,...- --·r·-- ---,--- ---r··- -----....-- ---1"'--. ---------...-------....-------------------
, , , , · , , , , , ë!
, , , , · , , , , ,
, , , , · , , , , , <7
, , , , , , , , , , ~9..?~_~9.~~~~9..'::'~~~~~!:~2____
· , , , , , · , , · ii
---f--- --+--- n+__ __+_n ---f·-- --+--- ---t--- --+--- __n_+n ---r--- 3
, , , , , · , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ROOT COLLAR DISEASE (1-5) ( J
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , · , · , , , ,
, , , · , , , , , , ~~~~~_~~2:~_~5]:~~______________ :0
, , , · I , , I , ,
, , , , , I , , , , co
---T--- --.,...--- ---T--- --,.....- ---,.-- -·-r--- ---,--- ---r--- -----....-- ---r---
I · I , , , I , , , NEEDS FERTILIZER n
, , , , , , , · , , 0
, , , , , , , I , ,
--_.&__... __...L.___ --_.&_-- --......--- ---.1--- __,.J.....__ ---.1--- ---..--- _____...L._.. --....--... ------------...-----....-----..-...----..--...-- 3
, , , , , , , , , ,
I · , , , , I , , , RECOMMEND REMOVAL 3
, , , , · , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , · --------------------------------------- CD
---,.--- --..,...--- ---,,--- --...,..--- ---,,--- ---1"'--- ---.,--- ---1"'--- -----....-- ---1"'--- ::J
· , , , , , , , , , REMOVAL PRIORITY (1-3)
, , , , , , , , , , 0.
· , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , HERITAGE TREE? !I.!
: , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ..
-
PROTECTED TREE? c:
( J
f-
~o
0<-<-
'" 0 0
-"''''
~:etz
cnUjm
.. 63
"0 ..
- O't..
"'(f
3ëô::J"
"'t.>'"
.. en
, ::;]'
'" -.
'" õ
" õ
_a. ()
'"
8
'"
~
"
m
..
"U ~
'" '"
<0 "
..
'" ~
s¡, 0
,
'" ~
I I I I I I -i
I I I I I I
I I . I I I ¡;¡
~ ~ ~ ,~ .~ .~ ,~ .~ .~
(C) co -.. ¡OJ :U1 :~ Ie..> :'" :~ ..
I I I I I I 'II: S»-
I · I I I I
I · , · .
~ §t ~ f. ~ () :9 :~ :Q? ¡;;; tço. "1JqJ f iÈ"
'" ¡i" .", g ¡g ~ :..
m' 3' '''' :.. .,¡¡¡ : fit
::> 0 la en 1-·
ãJ " ~ S1. ::> ¡~. i~· en ¡ffi" 113 I",
en ~ en 3 !::o 'tJ ",' 1= ~
en ." ," I" '3 I'" ~
'" II> ::T m' '.. 1m , § '0 ::I
3 !~ ,m 1m 1m "U
en 5' I!! ,- ,- !" 'tJ .... :oc
ãI 13 13 13 'C i» 'g¡ 22
g¡ ~ ~ '" 10 ~ '" , II> 'en 2- ª >
en · , , cã' · ::> I::;]' ¡z~
::I en 0 '0 · , , , õ' "" ,.,.,
;;, -, ,.. 'a. · · , , I() z .~ t¡J Õ
't> I , I 5' , '" . Ii C
2 ~ I I b '" s;! !.
CD · I ¡¡¡. · ¡¡;
s · · ... 3 H õ t""I t""I
, ::> ¡: " ~
5' , II> R .. > 0
ãJ' , ::I
c , , -I >
::> - , ,
en , , ,.,., ~
, , ""
· ,
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
~ ~ ,,,, g¡ I'" ,,,, ,0> ,~
0> 0 :'" :... ,'" 10 DIAMETER@ 4-1/2 FEET
---.1--- ,
--- --- n_ , --- --- --- ~~ .......--- ---...-..... -_....--- ---+--.. ---~-- -iñ-(j-L:ïri:¡¡i(~T'~~--------------------
CD ""'-. 1""'-. · , , I¿ :""'-.
:§ , I---f--- .
--- --- --- --- --- --~--- ---+-- ---+-- ---~--- --+-- ----------..---------------------------
· , , , , , ¡:
~ I~ I , , I~ I~
0> I\! , , co
:0> , , , It.> :0 DBH
, , , ..
, , , , , , /II
--- -oo --- n_ _n --- --- --- ---þo--- ......._-- ___to___ ------ ....-.--- ------ --..--------------....----....-------------
, , , , , , c
· , , , , , ii1
'" , , · , :~ ,
, , · , ,
- · , , , It.> , 3
'" , · · . , DBH
, · · , · , co
--- _n oo- --- --- _n , , , , , , --------------------------------------- "
--- --- "--roo"" ---.,--- ---...._- ---.,..-- ---..--- ----r--
, , , , , , JIAMETER @ 2 FEET ¡¡
, · · , , ,
, , , , · ,
--- --- --- --- --- --- n_ --- ---~--- ---""-..- -_..&._-- ---""--.. ---..--- ---..1..--
... ~ ... ICD :... It.> :... :~ It.> HEIGHT ESTIMATED
0 '" 0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '''' '0
--- --- --- --- --- --- ---~--- ___~n- ---f--- ---+-- -nf--- ___..1-__ -..----....----------..-.--..-----------.
,
0> '" '" 't.> '... !~ .... ,'" ,~ SPREAD ESTIMATED
0 '" '0 '''' '", '''' :'"
, , , , · , HEALTH (1-5)
~ t.> t.> :'" ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ I'"
, · , ,
--- --- n_ _n --- n_ --- --- ___~-n ---~--- ---f--- ---+-- n_tn_ ---+-- --------------------------------------. 0
~ ~ t.> :~ :... :... :... :~ I", ~:r_~_l!s:~l!~~_~:~2________________ 0
, · , , , , "
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- n_ ---.....-- -......--... ...--.....-... ...---...- ...-.............. ----...- ...
, , · , , , CONDITION RATING (2-10) ;:;:
, , · , , ,
, · , , · · õ
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- n_ ---~--- ---4--- _n~-__ ---+--- ---tn- ---+-- ----...---------...---...-...-----......---...----...- :s
, , : , , , HAZARD RATING (4-12)
, , , , ,
, , , , , ,
, , , , · ·
, · , , , · CROWN CLEANING
, , · , · , "tI
, , · , , , --------------------------------------.
--- --- --- _n --- --- n_ --- -"'-r--- ---.,--- ---r--- --....,...-- ---r--'" ---.,..-- 2
, · , , , , CROWN THINNING
, , , , , , 2-
, · , , · ,
--- --- --- --- --- n_ --- --- .......1.--- -....1...-... -...-1.--- ---.1...-- ---1.--- ___J..__ --------------------------------------- :s
· , , · , ,
· , , , · , CROWN RESTORATION CD
, , , , · , õ
oo- -oo '@ --- --- --- --- , · , · , , --...----.....-...----------...-------------...--
--- ---r--- -........ ......-1 ---"I ---'1'--- ---~--
, ,- ,- :õ , , CROWN RAISING ..
, ¡g ¡g , , 5!:
â · ro , ,
_n --- n_ -r --- n_ n_~--- ---+5 ---H5 ---+5 _nf_n ---+-- -----------------...------------------...- S-
.. · !~ '.. '(I) , , REMOVE END-WEIGHT
~ , 10. 10. , , CD
, , ,
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---....._- --..... ---I ----I ---..--- ------ -...-...----------...-...-----------------...--- Z
, , , , , ,
, · , , , , CABLES NEEDED # ..
, · , · , , ..
-- --- --- --- --- --- ---~--- ---+-- ---t--- ---+-- ---t--- ---+-- --------------------------------------- a.
, , , , , , PRUNING PRIORITY (1-5) ..
: · · , , ,
, , , , ,
, · I , , ,
, I , , , · "tI
, , , , , INSECTS (1-5)
· · I , · · CO
, · · · , !II
--- --- --- _n --- n_ --- --- ---..--- ---ot--- ---r--- ------ ---+--- ...----- ---------------------------------------
, , , , , c:
, , , · , · TREE CROWN DISEASE (1-5) c
, , , , , ,
--- _n --- --- _n --- n_ _n ---~--- ---~--- ___ton ___+n_ ---t--- _n+__ -------------------------------------- ¡¡-
, , , · , , DEAD \NOOD (1-5) CO
, , · , , ,
, · , , , , ..
_n --- --- _n --- n_ --- --- ___to___ ----1--- ---..--- ---....-- ---+--- ---....-- ---------------...-----------------...---- /II
, , , , , ·
, , , , , , TRUNK DECAY(1-5) ..
, , , · · ,
, , , , · , "tI
_n --- _n _n --- n_ --- --- -"'-r--- ---.,--- ---r--- ---...--- ---r--- ---""1'"-- --------------------------------------- ,
, , , , · ,
, , , , , , 0
, , , · , , '"
, , , , , , _~9..?_~.<?~~~~9..~~_':!?_!~:~L_ iõ
, , , , , ·
n_ --- n_ --- --- _n --- --- _n~-n ___~-n ___~-n ---+-- ---t--- ---+-- 3
I · , , , , ,
, , , , · , ROOT COLLAR DISEASE 11-5) ..
· , , , · ,
, , , , , ·
, , , , , , ~_~!:~~_~~~~_~5!:~L__m_______
, , · · , , ;0
, , , , , ,
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- oo- , , , , , · ( )
---r--- ---.,--- ---r--- ---,--- ---r--- ---.,...--
, , , , , , ~-~!:~~_:..~_~~I_~~~~~--------------- n
, , , , , , 0
, , , , , , 3
--- n_ --- --- --r- oo- --- -.....1....-- --....1--- ___1.___ ---...-- ...__1.___ ---......-
, , , , , ,
, · · , , , RECOMMEND REMOVAL 3
, , , , , ·
--- --- , · , , · , --------------------------------------- ..
--- --- --- --- --- .-- ---r--- ---...--- ---'/'-_.. ---..,..-- ---'/'--- ---..,..-- :s
· , , , , , REMOVAL PRIORITY (1-3)
· , , , , , a.
, · , , , ·
, , · · , , HERITAGE TREE? !I.!
, , , · , ,
· , , , , , ..
..
PROTECTED TREE? c
!II
l-f-c2l
EXHIBIT B
Addendum to Evaluation of Trees at the
Shashi, LLC, Subdivision Site
10752,10758 S. Stelling Road
Cupertino, Ca1ifomia
Assignment
I have been asked by Piu Kosh, Planner, City of Cupertino, to provide an opinion about
the long term feasibility of preserving the cedar trees, which are "protected" by city
regulation.
Observations
Tree # 5 is a deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) with a trunk diameter of 16 inches at 4 Yz feet
above grade. Its height is approximately 40 feet and its canopy spread is approximately
40 feet. This specimen is in relative good condition. I recommend that this tree be
preserved.
Tree # 7 is a deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) with a trunk diameter of 23 inches at 4 Yz feet
above grade. Its height is approximately 50 feet and its canopy spread is approximately
40 feet. This specimen is in only fair condition, because of the fact that this tree has been
topped. This destructive procedure produces a central leader that no longer grows. The
energy that would have gone to the central leader becomes diverted to the side branches.
In time, the side branches become long, heavy, and, thus, prone to failure. This can
sometimes be managed if pruning to side branches is possible in order to prevent
breakage. Unfortunately this tree has minimal side branching ofthe lateral limbs. Pruning
would result in further disfigurement. I recommend that this tree be replaced.
Tree # 8 is a blue atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica glauca) with a trunk diameter of 17, 10, 8,
7, 7, inches at 4 Yz feet above grade. Its height is approximately 40 feet and its canopy
spread is approximately 40 feet. This specimen is in relative good condition. I
recommend that this tree be preserved.
Tree # 10 is a deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) with a trunk of 14,7,5,4,4 inches at 4 Yz
feet above grade. Its height is approximately 40 feet and its canopy spread is
approximately 35 feet. This specimen is in only fair condition. It has been topped, and
has minimal side branches on the primary stems. As with Tree # 7, pruning will disfigure
this tree further. I recommend that this tree be replaced.
Replacement Recommendations
If any or all of Trees # 5, 7, 8,10 are removed, I recommend that they be replaced. In this
event, I recommend that these trees be replaced based on their value. The values of each
tree is addressed according to ISA (Intemational Society of Arboriculture) standards, 9th
Edition, Trunk formula method.
lf~
nu..\ 131 T E>
The ISA Westem Chapter Species Classification Guide is used to provide species ratings
and to provide a trunk values per square inch, which is part of the trunk formula method.
The trunk formula worksheet made available by the ISA is used to complete the
appraisals of these 4 trees. The worksheets are attached.
Tree # 5 has an appraised value of $ 4, II O. Should this tree be replaced, this value is
equivalent to 2 - 48 inch boxed specimens or 4 - 36 inch boxed specimens. These
equivalent values are based on the average wholesale price of the boxed size specimen
times 2.5, an average cost of delivery, soil preparation and installation.
Tree # 7 has an appraised value of $ 5,200. Should this tree be replaced, this value is
equivalent to 2 - 48 inch boxed specimens and I - 36 inch boxed specimens. An
alternative equivalent would be 5 - 36 inch boxed specimens.
Tree # 8 has an appraised value of $ 8,200. Should this tree be replaced, this value is
equivalent to 2 - 60 inch boxed specimens and 1 - 36 inch boxed specimens. An
alternative equivalent would be 8 - 36 inch boxed specimens.
Tree # 10 has an appraised value of$ 2,680. Should this tree be replaced, this value is
equivalent to 1 - 48 inch boxed specimens and 1 - 24 inch boxed specimens. An
alternative equivalent would be 2 - 36 inch boxed specimens and 2 - 24 inch boxed
specunens.
I recommend that the replacement trees be one ofthe following protected species:
Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara)
Blue atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica glauca)
Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)
Respectfully submitted,
MLB/BDC
4-;23
~
~
CITY OF
CUPERJINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Developmenr Departmenr
Novernber28,2005
Dipesh Gupta
Shashi LLC
20380 Town Center Lane #135
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - TM-2005-10
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the
meeting of November 22, 2005, approving a Tentative Map to subdivide a 20,473
net square foot parcel into 2 (two) parcels of approximately 7,387 and 7,390
square feet, located at 10752 S. Stelling Road), according to Planning Commission
Resolution No. 6339.
Please be aware that if the Tentative Map permit is not used within a three-year
period, it shall expire on November 22, 2008.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 10 calendar
days from the date of this letter. If this happens, you will be notified of a public
hearing, which will be scheduled before the City Council.
Sincerely,
, ~--.;
··/--1'~/~
Piu Ghosh
Assistant Planner
Cc : Leroy & Beatrice May, 10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino CA 95014
Manish Gupta, 20380 Town Center Lane #135, Cupertino, CA 95014
G: I Planning I Post Hearing IAction Letters I action letter tm20051O.doc
TM-2005-1O
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6339
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A TENT A TIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 20,473 NET SQUARE FOOT
PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS OF APPROXIMA TEL Y 7,387 AND 7,390 SQUARE
FEET AT 10752 S. STELLING ROAD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: TM-2005-10
Applicant: Dipesh Gupta, dba Shashi, LLC
Location: 10752 S. Stelling Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning
Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino
General Plan.
b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent
with the General Plan.
c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development
contemplated under the approved subdivision.
d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage nor injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat.
e) That the designs of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated
therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application TM-2005-10 for a Tentative Map is hereby
approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
page 2 thereof, and
Resolution No.6339
Page 2
TM-2005-1O
November 22, 2005
-------
--------------------------
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application TM-2005-10, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of
November 22, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The approval is based on exhibits titled: "Shashi, LLC Two lot subdivision,
10752 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 2 sheets, dated October 19,
2005, labeled Cl and C3 dated November OS, 2005, except as may be amended by
the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. DEMOLITION
The applicant is required to demolish existing structures in accordance with City
demolition procedures.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS:
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. SOUTH STELLING ROAD ELEVATION
The applicant shall design the elevation of the future house developed on the lot
at the corner of S. Stelling Road and Jollyman Lane in a manner that will keep the
look along Stelling Road consistent with the existing elevations along the street
since many houses front onto it. The elements that may be incorporated include a
front entry porch, a wrap around porch that wraps around the front of the house
to maintain a street front look.
5. COVENANT FOR TREE PROTECTION
The applicant shall prepare and record a covenant that runs with the land, prior
to final map approval, acknowledging the protective status of the two Cedars,
the two redwoods and the Southern Magnolia, notifying future property owners
of the kinds and numbers of trees protected by City Ordinance and the
requirement for a tree removal permit for these trees. The covenant shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
All protected trees on site shall be fenced off during construction, watered on a
regular basis and no trenching shall be done within 6' of the tree trunks.
G: \Planning\P DREPOR TiRESI2005 ITM-2005-1 0 res. doc
Resolution No.6339
Page 3
TM-2005-1O
November 22, 2005
--~--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
In the event that any trees need to be relocated or removed due to required
improvements, a tree removal application may be made to the Director of
Community Development.
6. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant, prior to approval of the final map, shall provide a tree protection
bond in the amount of $30,000 to ensure protection of existing trees on the site.
The bond shall be returned after recordation of the final map, subject to a letter
from the City arborist is indicating that the trees are in good condition.
7. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING
Applicant shall comply with the policies in the City's Below Market Rate
Housing Manual.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
8. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
9. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in
accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
10. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
11. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Fire, if needed.
12. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or
Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
13. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Pre- and post development calculations shall be submitted to the City, Runoff
shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
14. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
G: IPlanninglPDREPORTiRESI20051 TM-2005-1 0 res. doc
Resolution No.6339
Page 4
TM-ZOOS-IO
November 22, 2005
----------~---------------------------------------
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of
the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
15. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for
under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
Fees:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
d. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee
schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein
may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a
building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at
that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
$ 5% of Off-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,130.00 minimum
$ 6% of On-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,000.00 minimum
$ 1,000.00
TBD
N/A
$ 3,250.00
$15,750.00
By Developer
a, Checking & Inspection Fees:
b. Grading Permit:
16. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located
underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
17. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES
The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances
installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for
water service to the subject development.
18. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP
plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion
and or sediment control plan shall be provided.
G: IPlanning\P DREPOR TiRESI2005 ITM- 2005-10 res. doc
Resolution No.6339
Page 5
TM-200s-1O
November 22, 2005
-~-~------------------------~-----------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFlCA TE OF
ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 California Government Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV of
this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices.
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Chen,
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
AYES:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I s/Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Is/Gilbert Wong
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \Planning\P DREPOR TiRES12005\ TM- 2005-10 res. doc
INT-200S-01
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6340
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN INTERPRET A TION OF FRONT YARD FACING JOLL YMAN LANE FOR
A FUTURE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 19.08.030 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an
interpretation, as described in Section n. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) That design relationships with adjacent yards and buildings, and the protection of
specimen trees would be improved by interpreting the front yard as facing Hillcrest Road
as shown in the below referenced drawing; and
2) That design relationships would be improved by interpreting them consistently with the
existing neighborhood design and lot orientation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for an interpretation is hereby recommended for
approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page
2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. INT-2005-
01 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005 and
are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein.
Resolution No. 6340
Page-2-
INT-2005-01
November 22, 2005
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Location:
INT-2005-01
Dipesh Gupta (Shashi LLC)
Dipesh Gupta (Shashi LLC)
10752 S. Stelling Road
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "Shashi LLc, Two lot
Subdivision, 10752 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA." consisting of one sheet labeled C1,
except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
2. SIDE YARD SETBACKS
Applicant shall propose side yard setbacks that are no less that 6' from any protected
trees.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Chen
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
AYES:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/ s/Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
/s/GilbertWong
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: IPlanning\PDREPOR TiRESI2005 IINT- 2005-0 I.doc
¡
¡
I
¡
¡
!
!
,
,
¡
i
¡
o
¡
,
I
ï
¡
,
,
!
,
,
¡
,
~
!
,
~
¡
,
I
,
!
,
i
¡
,
8
!
,
8
¡
!
I
p
,
¡
,
¡
¡
!
,
,
!
,
¡
¡
¡
!
¡
,
,
i
1
!
I
,
!
1
,
,
,
,
,
!
Do'" .......
- -
œ/'l2lfJS P\J/ØIGN'PIICAtKII
10/04/05 P\JIImICIÐJIIITT.....
IOj1a¡œ Pl.HØNCRE9ØlTtAl
P~(;F'T\TRD
I nrr ?, 1 2005
I
I
BY:
fL_277,1Z'
FI._Z77.1Z'
f'L_271,12'
,~,
RW_ZIl4.68
INY ~. PIPE
INV 4" PIPE
..v...· PIPE
~ .~--~'
~CM:GAA1E
.I \
\
/
~.
"--. ..~
~"
/
/
W
::J "'
'" Z
~ W N
~ ....
!rl "'
'"
o z is'''
, .... '"
:E :Q 8"' -~
~WZOWI.n
j ~WC N~g¡
. ~z: ~M~
j ~~::Jz~
W.....VI~_
.....
ci
'"
z
00
¡nZ
5:J
0....
I W"" Q.
(Df-O ""
:=>(f] :E
::3{/) 'Ò W
--.J t- (f)~ ~ ~
Ig(\ ~
... tn If)w . f-
1 <C 01'0... _ Z
~ ::r: 3: O::J å ~
(/) I-.-U
~I
Job No.:
]a... Dab!:
Dn._u,: œ
PnoJactl.rchltoc:t: MIA
Cb.cbd.1I1' ..
m.. N......CU.q
PItJt. Daw II!-li-2005
- -
- -
_N<>.: C1
·
i,
·H
I ci! 61
II Ii
I'l
· 'liD
I : B
I I I
i I ,-
"I , I ~
I Ll
,I P '. 3119-2~- o5~ n C.....NU
i i i I ~~'~BII~~MIC.Ui'"
· I "I <OO~6 IOL!.'c... 0001'"
1 GUP!:RTDiC. 801
II I TRACT NO./ & 25
I 557 MAPS 2
,I
.1 "I '-_~
~I __
, I
I \
I,~~~~ -,
iI
~":::2!1n4·THR\J.FL_275.7J· ~
INV B" PIPE _~~
-8"'5'5 @
--
'æ
sUI..DING OU1\.JNE 7)'7./7'/7///77T/;777-"'77/77/
5'C(WTOURINTERVAl-100-
I'CCNTOURIHTERY.....-lOl-
CEtl1UIUNE
FEllCE:-1YI'EHOTEC-'--'-'-
GASLJNE ~-
O'ÆRHEADUNE _DH-OH-
PI.).N RafT-OF-WAYUNE- - - --
RECOROBOUNDARY
SANIT1.RYS['I£R-~SS-
W"iE!lUNE . w-
PAOPOSEDF'fIOPERTYUNE,
PROPOSED DEDICATION
DESCRIPTION
RETAININGW'\u'
aORE HOLE LOCATION
WATER VALVE
SPOTELEVAllON&:
.'"
SURVEY CONTROL
DRIP UNE
-~-
, t
I ~
I .. :I:\~22,O:;<!" J'~~¡(11.,,~ I
~~~--ßOC~ (~T"" --..----
I ¡C>40 o~o. cA-at><]14 I
CUPKR'fU A
Ll 0:"''"'"
I ~
L
",
".
",
,
....:264,81·
INV12"PlPEIN,FL-2IIO.3I·
INV12" P!f"õ IN. FL_2f1O.20'
IIIVU" PlPEWT. FL_211O.1~·
I
~c
,,'
~
.
.
,,'
\\
'\\\
r\¡ \.
1\
I
I
I
I
I
"-I',~" S:;¡-'I2-( OO
P~.1fl DRU~O ¡, "'''0 mlùlA
1000~ó OJiWl. cr
<:tJPI'IITIJ'O,CA"MU
PARCEL MAP
561 MAPS 44
3
PARCEL
I
I
I
I
,
;,
"
i
-,
I
I
1
I
1-
J
,
L
A,P¡('.1','_2<_DBf,
K:II W1H .~1) H,U;KY
'O?L'Ooll"[Lr
OUl'~I/T\~O, n "5"'~
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
.,r.~" 359.¡æ-OO& í
~~:~~"[{r~~G~Ú w="- I
, .
RECORD OF SJRVÈY
286 MAPS 28 I
I
I
,--P.¡(.. :,~O-".-OO4
CHU A\E:l(A>jU><R t. 1ùI" J~~H ¡
10'11" SOL"fH ",=IN~RD.
CL,.>Kl1¡(O.CA.,a,. ~
-~
,-
I
~
,
... W w ,104 .
!toll w rn"12"!
I ø;~:ç -=-cc- .
i~ 0(/ (
IN,
I 1[, LEGAL OWNER AS FOLLOWS
I I LANcsroBE SI.IB-Dl\I1DED Þ.R£ OrotlED BY
I ¡t,pN, J5!i_22_œ1.II......SHOOPTADBASHASHIU.C.
1OJðO~CENT[RLJd£,SUI1[13O,CJPER-nNO,C"
,
I i
145' I
I
,--
r-
1
I
I
I
1 1.""IEJ()HJiN.ANDõ',íJ.Y¡(lC
:i'Caa~ O¡¡U¡;E OT
C[JJ'~~1l1<O, CA 9~01'
I
1
L
~
.\.P,It , 3~~_~~_etlO
U:;¡OYlI..&<BI'ATlttctH-!UY
te75!!5.mT.UßiGRn
CUPER'''''''. C~ "'0'4
!
ì -----58(_"",
....... .---¡ "
--,-- \d b~
---\"=-~;;&i~,",",-~- ,=- .J
. "
~
,
_._1
I
,-J
,-
I
I
L
·
·
"
~
·
"
"
~
z
5'
_J
b
N
10,035.55 S~
7,390,39 SF
i¡¡~4'
.'\
EASEMENT
-~~~'J::"~~~v-",~~~
, !'IgO-OO'OO"W 215.00'
'-'~,-=--.:.A2^-.
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LEGEND
~HALTICCONalETE
ACE! .'J'HlGHASPHAL1\CCONCRETEBERII
~ ASPHALTCONCRETEPA'oÐIENT
~ ANQ.EPOINT
~KE BIKE LANE 51RIPING
BLOC BUILDING
BORE BOREI«!I.ELOCATJON
BCI'/I eACK OF WAU(
C8 CATCN BASIN
a.. CENTERUNE
"" """"
CONC CONCRETE
DASH OASHED UNE STRIPING
01 DRAlNAGEINLET
DUlE D"YUGHT
DWY DRIVE WAY
EL£C ELECTRICAL
E-RIS EL£C~CALRlSER
EL£CT El£CTROUER
EP EDGEOF'PA'ÆIIIENT
ro """
IT F1NISt£D F\.OOR ELEVATION
fH FlREI-MIRAHT
FL FLOW U~
CB CR"-OEBRE:,tJ(
HP H¡CHPDlNT
HV HIGH WLTAGE VAULT
H6:T HUBilcTACK
~V IN\'ERT
JT JOINT TRENCH
UP UP Of GUTTER
IIIE ",,I,TCHEIIISTING
IIIH MANHOLE
UON MONUWENT
N6:S NAlLikSHINER
NG NA1URALGROUND
.. 00=
POL PONT ON UNE
PW PA!NTIIIARK-TYPENOTED
PW POT"-8\.E WATER
REF!- REFlEClI'Æ BUTTON STRIPING
SDIIIH STCRMDR....NWANHOLE
SL8 STREETUGHTBOX
SOUD SaJD UNE STRIPING
SPI( SPIKE
55 SAHITARYS£WER
SSCO SANITARYSEWERc.£ANOUT
SSWH SAHITARY$nI£Rt.lANHOLE
.. """""'
TI'C TIP OF CURB AT FACE
TOG TOP OF GRތ
TOW TOP OF WAU.
Vo.T VAULT
W WATER
WW WATER WEYER
.00
'"
,,'
c
II
~
C-J_
I
,
APPR\)VAI.
.g Cammlnlon
flanli!.
~II"S¡;::::::=:--~
m"'
RI....285.61
r¡v 1~" Pl'E
INV15"F'I'E
INV 16" F'I'[
IN,fL_216.4Î
IN,FL_278-4Î
OOT.FL_Z16.4Î
.
,
.
,-
INVIZ"PIPEIN.FL-ZI!lO.15' T
INV1Z"PlPEIN,f1.-ZN.'"
~V 1~" F'IPE WT. Fl_2N.N·
EXISTING TREES BASIS OF BEARINGS UTILITY NOTE
AU.ÐOSl1NG~ŒS_W1-ni!NTHESUB..ECTPROPER1Y lHE BEAR1NQS SHOWN l.1'ON THS Will' AAEBASED WON-niE THEU1lU1lES9iDIINON-niISWAPAIIEOERI'lEDfflCIIISUIIFACE
UNESWlLl.BEREIoIOVEO. ŒNml:L.llEaFJIJlL'llUH1.ANEASFOJNDII()f'II.IMElHEDANOSHO'/I'HMi OBSERVAl1a<1. ,\CTUALLOCATIONA/CISlZE.TOCETHER'M-nil1iE
USTuPOH -niATCERTAlN TAACT.u.P NO. 78O!.f1LEC rnR RECORD AS PRESDCE Π'ANY ADDITIONAL UTUlY UNES NOT SHOwN ON -nil! PLAN,
EICIOK~701fWAPSASPAGE2'J,SANTACl/IR.o\(:OIJNTYRECOROS. SHALL lIE ØFlED IN l1iE f1ElD8Y-niEc:ONTRACTCIIIDURING
CD'IS'fRUC1lON.
EXISTING BUILDINGS BENCHMARK SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
Ali.ÐOsmG9I.JILDItlGS,STmJClURES, PA1los..tDRIvEWAYS lHE'ÆR11CALD"TUIoiFOFl-niISSlTEISBASEDUI'ONSANTAQ.A/lA THIS IIAP WASPREI'ARm BY IlECRUNDEM IIYOIREC-nON AHD IS BASED
SH()"M<IWlT1iIN-niEsua.£CTPROPERT'1'TlJ9E~DVED. VALl.EYWATUlOISTRlCTBEN~AR {NUUB.ER611442ATTHESCIU-niIll[ST CN A f1ElDSURVEYPERFORWEIICN AUOOST1g,2OOð, Al.KõUST21. AND
aJRNERaFlokQLU.ANRCJ.I)AIoI) SCU1H STEUJNGROAf). S£P1'EMIIER....~·
n£VA'IICN _ 287.44'
om
DJimsc.CHAP!'EI..l. P.LS.
UœtlSENUIIBEN1951.2
¡¡;-
TENTATIVE MAP PREPARER
TEN1A1lvE MAP P~EPARED BY
III1L.LARDDECI<ER,R-C.E.4ðe2'J,EXP.D€c.J1.'œ
LAND USE
UISTtNGðS!NGlEFAl.ltYRESlIJÐI1lAL
PROPOSED_StNQ.EfAlollLYRESJOENl1AL
I
, SUB-DIVIDER
THE RESlDEN1lAL LOT SUB-Dl~SlON IS BEING Qa<I[ BY DtF'ESH ¡;UPT...
DBASHASHILl.C.2D3IICTOIINCENTERlANE,SUllEt3S.CJPERl1NO.CA
~
'"
IN.fl-:!8R.5f'
tlv8"PlPEIN,FL-287.SS·
NV1B"~THRU.Fl-280.07'
~
~
ª
i
i
.
o
o
~
,
~
,
o
>
~
~
~
~
i!
,
~
~
.
~
<
,
E
¡
~
o
8
~
ó
!
>
~
~
~
~
o
~
"
~
ª
"
~
j
>
~
~
8
~
~
~
~
No .,... Revilion
- -
J/1S/115 """"',.....
11/8/05 a.£lrnRE'llSl~
PAYE~ENT
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
.5" HIGH ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE BERM
ASPHALTIC CONCRElE
ANGLE POINT
BIKE LANE STRIPING
BUILDING
BORE HOLE LOCATION
BACK Of WALK
CATCH BASIN
CENTERLINE
CORNER
CONCRETE
.-...
INLET
LEGEND
AC
ACB
ACP
AP
81KE
8LDG
80RE
BOW
es
CL
COR
CONC
~
01
DUTE
~
~"'~284.68'
INV." PPE IN, FL~J!77.12'
INV 4" PIP£ IN. FL_277.12'
INV." PlP£IN. FL_277.12'
INV 4" PIPE IN. FL_277.12'
INV8"PIP£OOT.FL-277.12'
\
\
"'O~."'I,J
œ_
~.
~,
"
.00
rBS)i-PRŒ2059¡/
I
~"_284.SI·
INV12"I'IPEIN,Fl_2BO.J1'
INV12"I'IPEIN,FL-2!IO.20'
INVIJ!"I'IPEOUT,fL",2BO.1S'
"'
"
~' ~~
..,"" ~
25~.,99FL254óE .... I
TFQIIiWf'f LP 2~ó 1
~~5.1;:, ~
",,,
·
I
,
28<.S2
Fl 28'
.".....80'
2~4,99
WO""
·2B4
"'
TOP OF CQNCRElE UTlUTY
~ " , EASEMENT
'" z 'i;. 10' "
" 0 r z
" 0 ~ "-OOR - 0
~ 0 ~
. ~ FR""IING
~
z . 0 31 I ~
< ~ f F.F.PER .
~ 0 "
~ g z ~ ,
. " t
~ ,
~
-ª-'" \ .LA £.1!!.. = +2%.... I +5 (E)GRD.
~
~(N)12".DROPINLET
wi c.!. GRAlE
lOT GRADING SECTION A-A ~(~)'2" lRCPS.D.TOS.D.
UNDER S_ STELU~G ROAD
-
SCALE: =10'
/-0;:.-'.-/''/,// /,/,
EGEND
~li.DING OU1U~E 777;
COIHOUR I~TERVAL
CONTOORINTERVAL
ENTERU~E ----
NOTED
/,"'
õNCE TYPE
-'SU~E _
\.£RHEI\D UNE
LAN RIGI-IT-Of-WAY UNE- - - - -
ECOROBOUNDARY
,yjITARYSEW[R S5 55-
MER UNE. .
ROPOSED PROPERTY UN[,
--
01-1-01-1-
w
œ ~ U1
W W ~
ð ?i: ~
w :z ..:'"
ç ...J U~
!i:Q 8 :g IlfJ:
õ:!ltlzN5co
WZ~~~~
~~fë::>",~~
Uw...... ~-
"
~
!
o
ATION
APPROVAl.
EP
Pl!i!!Hl;:g Ca.,::¡;rlà!rr..
FH
FL
28'
ß:_:i ~~g~
UP '~O'28S60
85.41 :~VL-
I:RO\MII \L.....:~'^-T
'285_44
-~
I
·
~m
286_05
m,
"
N
<IS
~
§
,
z
:3
Q.
W
~
~
o
<IS
l:I
z
~
Q
~
l:I
~
·
·
"
·
o
a:
ü
z
::J
--'
W
z>--
aU)
Vi .
5U)
cpaJ<:(
mLf)u
=>r--
~(f)S?ó
--.JI- ;:;
- 0 ÑI-
i7j--.JLf)8S
<I.: 0 ¡-""D-
:r:3:0=>
Ull- ..--U
BS"S'C Mal
JT JONT TRENCH
LIP UP OF GUTIER
~E MATCH EXISTING
~H '-1ANHOLE
~ON MONU'-1ENT
N&S NAIL
ÃL GROUND
OUlliT
POINT ON LINE
PAINT MARK-TYPE NOTED
POTA8LE WATER
REFLECTIVE 8UTTON STRIPING
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
STREET LIGHT BOX
SaUD LINE STRIPING
SPIKE
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SIDEWALK
TOP OF CUR8 AT FACE
TOP OF GRADE
TOP Of WALL
VAULT
WAlER
WATER METER
--
-18"$0-
85.67
. ,
~.
RlM-:zæi.67
IfjVI5"PPEIN,FL-27t1.47>
INV 15" PPE IN, FL-2711.47'
INVI8"PlPEOUT,FL-278.47'
.....
.
-----t:J."
28386
.~
OL
POL
P.
PW
Rm
SDMH
SLB
SOLID
SPK
SS
SSCO
SSMH
SW
TfC
TOG
TOW
"'-T
W
""
28S3J;~,.2~
F1. .: .~____t90
2~5_ .Ei. ~. 28 '80
"'
!J1~5-91
285.87
H'1"ELECVlT
01128£'°
~"~" ~, ¡~.~'
.. 2~6.IS
TC( ' VlT
28:3.3 --286<15
E-Rl5
28525
TFC 285.2'
~~,
'/251
"c{-BOW
fi!6-32,' 6.'-, !¡lOW
_~41'28.&. "864" -:>8627'
" UP -pll-,S.'-1fC f f'~WY TfC~,
25"" 1B:\!>8~-=1aô¡;1 2857fjA
'~,ì. W FL ~~5~Fl TFCCID'/fY 285 2
R -287.24 uP '\- Ò;) UP'::
IN 8" PPE TtJRU. Fl_275.7! '-., <'I !B
7_4 S '°565 2862;\ _~
~g6BS ""-- - - ~N C!L~~D~
^~,/ / S
~."",',86. 286.34 J.~2 ÍI.J 2B543
. ··.uP P . N LIP
54, 2~' '" .,- _____n_ ____n_. ~
-. _TfC 18 ~5-861;:~4,,¡ _W¿~~~
~'
~
"'
28692
~-.
1J;,6~
'·WItT
"
"
'"
&~~J_
286,5U
,fL'
,,"
~
d
~4 288
we
2866'
,.
\
'\
~\",
2S5~
"' '
M
286
~
Jòf
/
/~'\
"
8t..~
~
·
,",
^"
'"'
"-
\
\ D
'.
\.
\
~81
, ~m
2B7.'~----'~69Q I
œ '"
'.
----.~~~
,
287.4'
&SETHo!tT
287.61 287.6-.1
2¡ft¡R3 WNLlT3.01
œ
~
287.2
,œ, .
¿87.S
"
"
257_"
~e
)D" 11IEI
"
----...
23'_75
œ
"
'"
287_54
FN(:POl
~
;-
~
,
"
...
¿
~
R!W-ZM.DJ' \r
INV12"I'IPEIN,FL_280.1S'
INV12" PIPE IN, Fl_Z79.¡ :J·
INV1S"I'IP[OUT,FL_Z79.79·
'_S.oe: CON'
'^" RIOl-OCATE(£)
PGa:EV,t.ULT
TYPE .....-~
~ /I: GUTTER
,\,CPPAYI;:MI'N
00
,,~
.800\
28-9.31"..,ri,
[LEC I, ~'ï
\
"'''\ '"'
" ~
\
288.34 ,.
FENCE TO SE287.1;
'_/, ~G
(::9
::;'TAP
\
----------------~-
~8ß. 7H
Le8.n PW-ELEC
PGI<E~,
"
'"
?8t_3
~,
\
"
I
\
\
ENJI~ENTS
,
\
2BB.5
~,
288.72
~,
SHED 288..7
~,
Zb8_37
cONe,~M5
,~,
í LDG
288.7'
~,
.we
28B9
~e
91
\
\
\
,
,
\
2B9.õ"
~
20',.32
-.cOSW
~
b
N
~ -./' \
." Sos. ~
:: - l\
f'NCAP (
,,¡;, I~'!
~~f~Kî(
J'f
~ ¡
~!I
~ ¡
.
FrI. J/"- IP, OPE~
-288.1:----.
"
28~.22
'"
1? :887J
~,~
;ý 2Si
-'~ '"
4" TREE
- -
290'9 ~
'" ~
,(1;'
"
zg1n7
'2!W·~·~...2,',8ii:¡iÒ·r'lf'CðOT
~ ~
;;N¡
- mnrn>
4
~~
_¢t·;f.
~"t
.- 'i
!.Y'--~ 290,08
~ -NC POL
289.83
( ~ 2:aGOS
I~I
\ I .. mn
"r\ý i;"~
~ f"'-''>-íF = 293,
~)b'IO
C,75
'..
"
,~
Æ
ftEI.!X:ATE(E)
F'OWERPOLE
,8/
we
'"
~~
A
::
~,~ ~
r'~
r F,F,~3,5
L
a.. ~
----
"
291.B2
œ,..
.
~'\
t nl5 ,n__~
"
(N)9"DlA.5
CONNECT TO
~RElOCATE(E)UGlH
::g~~tM£)
lablllo.:
IaaueDo.tc:
DnI-.nBy:
ProjllctArob1tect: N/"'
C1uocbdlly; 'MJD
P\lo, Kame 2508tp(CJ).dwq
,/
TH' Ul1LIT:ES SHO""" O~ lKI'; MW APE ~ER;VID FliG~ SLIPFACE
nRS'RVA:TIO~. AÇTJ~.c l?CA 11l11~ A'-JD 9ZE, TOCE THE¡; '~Th THE
P~lSU<CE OF A~' ADD'll~~AL UI,UT¡ ,I,<E:O NO: 3n8wr. C'N T~'
5H"" 8E VE~"''-D ,~ l~E f;[lD ~, THé c-J"""'.CrO" OuP '-<:'
290.1J
ClACD'/fY
29032
~-.
lOCAllONCf'
RElOCATEO (E) UGI
10'UllUTYE.o.SUIENT
fe'/;
.' :;'ï
!.YifJ
'"
'"
'" 0 ~
~:: "~I
5' I
-~
THEBEAP"'C35HO"'NUPQN!HL5o.1APA.Rf6ASEDUP<)"TH£
CENTERUNo OF JOll Y>.!AN LAN[ AS F')UI,r, MO'W~ENTED AN[' S~QWI\ "
EA5TUPGti THO.' (tRI.,-" TRAC1MAP N;;·, lea1, F'LE¡;' fORR"C~D"õ
BOOK ~S7 'i "AP'; AS PAGE 20, $ANT> Ci A"~ ~')'-'~T' PECCPl',>
(N) PROP tji£T
IiRATE_Z91.J9
tjV,OUT_J!II9.6
(N)ACP
(N) Sme:WALK
RETAINING WAll
BORE HOLE LOCATION
WATER VALVE
SPOT ELEVAi10N & DESCRIPTION
SIGN
SURVEY CONTROL
TREE \\1111--1 DRIP UNE
=:J
=:J
--
.
;;,
,~
[>,
J
!---7
-
IJ.81'
INV 12" PIPE IN. FL-289.W'
INV9" PIPE IN,FL"287.56'
INV18" PIPE ltfRU. FL_280_0, /
I
/
5$6
!
I!"_S.S.
i\
,
"
~:
,
29"_l.'
.~
'"''" ''"'' I
TFCa:¡w-,lIP, 0 d
11' .''''1&/,.,,",
f(-22!/ ·811<[ P/REFLI
H I
"jlj.i i
Tfa:¡~ t
: I
I
;9.3.50
,,"0
,
m
".
,
,,"
m'r"
,~¡(~ E 0
~n.04
~P : 288
, 'ASH
,
,""II
"'
2g22
1945OUD
i
"
0,
91.B9'
~ '
2n].0
TF~wr
iFtii,
¥F't81
29'Ì-J4
FL,
(N) HANDlCN' RA/oIP
SID_I_2'
RlIo!-29J.59'
TffiU,rL_2I1e,OC'
,.,
,
"'
,I ,
i\l;'9T~"
i ~fL ~
j : ~914
!TfC
?1otDe.t.e11-06-2005
- -
-
Sheetlllo.: C3
.-
T'0',AND"õ3Aõõl
',jHST':'.'N:
~TE
MY:"
U~DER
~,.'-Gf;
,'l"¡"1S': CH"i-'"EL'". flC
I."TNSE I,')M';,O n~'
-'-
THE V[,'l1U. C' FSP "liS SIT:: 'S ~ UçCI,.-',AH"'-(L.'.P
·,'^.c." ,,~TE" [ NU"Ec-lR 8"4£: Al ,~¡- '''-',1
CGR"~~ V 'hC
ElEVATlCìN-287.44·
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
- -
SCALE: =20
ü¡,~
45'
,
.:g~
~ti'l'
45'
/,/
,/
,/
/
~.
-.. ,;_.. .:, ').
',::' "3 ' - ,"- ~-- ""-
--
18
Ü4.18'
;¡;;:-
I
I
"~
(
-
APPROVAL -'-11 -}..()OfJ-
"....,............
I
I
1~ AIŒA - 10.353.31 BF
NET AHEA _ 8,738.20 SF
[- C.ÖNC·· J
r(~ . . -..-..-" \.
).
¡
II
L¡- CONC WALK (
¡ NG)
1 ,,' . ,. l
¿ of, ..,. .., , I 98..70'
= - -. ./ICONC ..,.- -', 'J'2.24' --
RED. "<I 4 .. 4
.. .., ,\'
~
E)ISTlNG 1-STORY
;þD FRAME HOUSE
...
OF THE MAY FAMILY TRUST I
APN 359-22-060 ~
'III :11
þ x x r
...
I~ AREA - 10,270.61 8l" I
NET AREA = 15,6815.M Sf
I . ~
13 . ~47
_ __62.e4'_ ~
~ 9F
_... D . ctJRB
.~ '"
o~
_ _ ~~(AbbS90.00'OO"~14.79 @-
W -W -W
2"5D
\
/.
'"
r'-v-
f1:"
(NG)
31
IÐ
III a.:1/;;r¡D6
1:;11
-
/
1~ -
PliiJwit!.!J COII/mlss/PII
1---
CDn .....øcrr
Signall
--
b
(\
II
..-
~
-N-
-L-
I
I
I
17
.
WALNUT
,
,w tJf SURVEY
286 MAPS 28
1'<J
l
I
I
I
.J
""~D'
" ~
~ ~-~
.~
.
LANDS OF RODRIGUEZ
APN 359-22-005
W
..J
«
o
en
-,I¡-
I
I
,
,
,
..,
2a
-
l
-
..
w-
5"5D-
,
,
~IÇ
,,00
W,a
~
-r
W
::m;
(NG)
I
I
l¡¡
..
~
I
~-
~
JðLL YMA1\! LANEW
v~/y..-..~
N90·00'OO"W 215.00'
. . .
IGH
...... .....
....--... --
x
......... ...- ..:_ ........1.. .---..-
. . 11'
'"
.J
,¡¡ ", 4
"..,. .
"/
l I ~
~ I ~ ) ,7. \
'1 ~ (...24' + \~
\ - ~ - -~
~ I "
,- -' """ '-'"
- .~ =:j .-.,'--------
I~ " ~
U EXIST. CURD N
,
.g
W
2" D
I
I
-........-
WV._
vi»-
2"SD
215.00'
I
n
N9JJ.ŠO·OO"E
W
-W
off
-W-
oo
I
L '
N:
Î
.
',;
wv
~
'i\~~
~
-
00'
~
'b
o
'b
P
o
o
z
;1',
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application:
Applicant:
Property Ow'ner:
Property Location:
TM-2005-12,INT-2005-02
Dipesh Gupta
Leroy & Beatrice May
10758 S. Stelling Road
Agenda Date: November 22, 2005
Application Summary:
TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide a 22,566 square foot lot into two parcels (7,486 and
8,744 square feet in size) in a Rl-6 zoning district.
INTERPRERATION to allow the front yard of the lot at the comer of Jollyman Lane and
Orline Court to change from Orline Court to Jollyman Lane.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the tentative map, file
number TM-2005-12 and the interpretation request, file no. INT-2005-02, in accordance
with the model resolutions.
Project Data:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Total Acreage (gross):
Net Acreage per parcel:
Density:
Low Density Residential, 1-5 DU / gr. acre
Rl-6
22,566 square feet
Lot 2- 7,486.04 sq. ft., Lot 2- 8,744.49 sq. ft.
3.86 du/ gr. acre.
Project Consistency with: General Plan:
Zoning:
Environmental Assessment:
Yes
Yes
Categorically exempt.
BACKGROUND:
The project site is located on the northwest corner of Jollyman Lane and Orline Court at
10758 S. Stelling Road. The lot lacks curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements.
An existing house is located toward the rear of the lot with driveway access taken from
the southwest corner of the lot. Surrounding land uses are predominantly single-family
residential uses with the exception of the Redeemer Lutheran Church located to the
south of the property.
S-I
TM-2005-12,INT-2005-02
Page 2
November 22, 2005
DISCUSSION:
Zoning and General Plan Conformance:
At 7,486.04 and 8,744.49 net square feet, both proposed lots are consistent with the
zoning designation of Rl-6. The residential density at 3.86 d.u./ gross acre is also
consistent with the general plan land use designation.
Tree Removal:
The lot has six trees located on it. There are four trees located along the west property
line while the other two are located to the north and the west of the property. The
arborist also pointed out that there are eight Italian Cypresses on the property to the
north at 10725 Orline Court that should be considered protected and proper measures
be taken during development on the property to protect those trees. The arborist's
report has recommendations for the protection of these trees. These have been included
in the conditions of approval for the project.
The applicant is proposing to remove all the trees. The City's consultant arborist, Barrie
D. Coates and Associates, conducted a tree survey (Exhibits A and B).
Tree No. and Tvpe Condition Recommendation Notes
#16 Coast Redwood Good Retain Fairly large tree located in the
northwestern corner of the lot
#13, 14, 15 Siberian Elm Fair Retain Large trees located along the western
property line
#17 Walnut Fair Mav be removed Large tree. A large portion is dead.
#18 Auricot Fair Mav be removed Fruit tree.
Interpretation:
For the corner lot, the zoning ordinance requires the Orline Court frontage (the shorter
side) to be the front yard, since it is the shorter lot line abutting a street. This
determines the building setbacks from the property line and the building footprint of
the lot. It is logical to consider the Jollyman Lane frontage as the front yard. However,
to do so requires a Planning Commission interpretation.
DISCUSSION:
During the initial staff review of the subdivision, staff and the applicant came to the
conclusion that interpreting the Jollyman Lane as the front yard would give the
applicant a more consistent street frontage on Jollyman Lane since they plan to develop
and build (in conjunction with the property adjacent to this one) three homes on
Jollyman Lane. If this interpretation is not approved, this property could potentially be
built as close as 12' from the property line while the house next to it (on the left) will be
located 20' from the property line. This would give an inconsistent look to the street
frontage on Jollyman Lane. The applicant is also proposing a 20' side yard setback on
G: \PlanninglP DREPORTipc TMreports 12005 tmreports I TM-2005-12. doc
5-~
TM-2005-12,INT-2005-02
Page 3
November 22, 2005
the street side. The proposed interpretation also gives the applicant the option of a
larger rear yard for use.
Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Assistant Planner ~
Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community DevelopmentcS Ú-J. {j~cA!
Ck/
Enclosures: Model Resolution for TM-2005-10, INT-2005-0l
Plan Set
Exhibit A: Tree Survey & Arborist Report for 10752 and 10758 S. Stelling
Road
G: \PlanninglP D REPOR TipcTMreporls 12005 tmreports \ TM- 2005-12. doc
5-3
TM-2005-12
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 22,566 NET SQUARE FOOT
PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS OF APPROXIMATELY 7,486 AND 8,744 SQUARE
FEET AT 10758 S. STELLING ROAD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Owner:
Location:
TM-2005-12
Dipesh Gupta, dba Shashi, LLC
Leroy and Beatrice May
10758 S. Stelling Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning
Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino
General Plan.
b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent
with the General Plan.
c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development
contemplated under the approved subdivision.
d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage nor injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat.
e) That the designs of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated
therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application TM-2005-12 for a Tentative Map is hereby
approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
page 2 thereof, and
5-1
Resolution No.
Page 2
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
-----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application TM-2005-12, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of
November 22, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The approval is based on exhibits titled: "Shashi, LLC Two lot subdivision,
10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 2 sheets, dated October 19,
2005, labeled C2 and C4 dated November 08, 2005, except as may be amended by
the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. DEMOLITION
The applicant is required to demolish existing structures in accordance with City
demolition procedures.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS:
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. COVENANT FOR TREE PROTECTION
The applicant shall prepare and record a covenant that runs with the land, prior
to final map approval, acknowledging the protective status of the redwood and
the three Siberian Elms, notifying future property owners of the kinds and
numbers of trees protected by City Ordinance and the requirement for a tree
removal permit for these trees. The covenant shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney.
In the event that any trees need to be relocated or removed due to required
improvements, a tree removal application may be made to the Director of
Community Development.
5. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant, prior to approval of the final map, shall provide a tree protection
bond in the amount of $10,000 to ensure protection of existing trees on the site.
The bond shall be returned after recordation of the final map, subject to a letter
from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition.
G: IPlanningIPDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005-12 res.doc
s-s
Resolution No.
Page 3
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
---------------------~-------------------------------
6. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING
Applicant shall comply with the policies in the City's Below Market Rate
Housing Manual.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
7. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
8. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed In
accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
9. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
10. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Fire, if needed.
11. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or
Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
12. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Pre- and post develOpment calculations shall be submitted to the City. Runoff
shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
13. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of
the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
14. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for
under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
G:IPlanningIPDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005-12 res doc
S-lo
Resolution No.
Page 4
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
-~-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Fees:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
d. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee
schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein
may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a
building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at
that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
$ 5% of Off-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,130.00 minimum
$ 6% of On-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,000.00 minimum
$ 1,000.00
TBD
N/A
$ 3,250.00
$ 31,500.00
By Developer
a, Checking & Inspection Fees:
b. Grading Permit:
15. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located
underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
16. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES
The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances
installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for
water service to the subject development.
,17. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP
plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion
and or sediment control plan shall be provided.
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF
ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 California Government Code)
G:\PlanningIPDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005-12 res.doc
5-1-
Resolution No.
Page 5
TM-200S-12
November 22, 2005
------------------------------------~----------------
------------------------------~--------------
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV of
this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices.
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABST AIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \PlanningIPDREPORTiRES\2005ITM-2005-12 res.doc
S-ß
INT-2005-02
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN INTERPRET A TION OF FRONT YARD FACING JOLL YMAN LANE FOR
A FUTURE SINGLE-F AMIL Y RESIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 19.08.030 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an
interpretation, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) That design relationships with adjacent yards and buildings, and the protection of
specimen trees would be improved by interpreting the front yard as facing Hillcrest Road
as shown in the below referenced drawing; and
2) That design relationships would be improved by interpreting them consistently with the
existing neighborhood design and lot orientation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for an interpretation is hereby recommended for
approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page
2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. INT-2005-
01 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005 and
are incorporated by reference though fu1ly set forth herein.
5-~
Resolution No.
Page-2-
INT-2005-0l
November 22, 2005
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Location:
INT-2005-01
Dipesh Gupta (Shashi LLC)
Dipesh Gupta (Shashi LLC)
10752 S. Stelling Road
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "Shashi LLC, Two lot
Subdivision, 10752 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA." consisting of one sheet labeled Cl,
except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: IPlanningIPDREPORT1RESI2005IJNT-2005-0 I.doc
5-10
BARRIE D. COATE
and ASSOCIATES
Horticutural Consultants
23535 Summit Road
Los Galas. CA 95033
408135:>-1052
EXHIBIT A
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE
SHASm LLC, SUBDIVISION SITE
10752,10758 S. STELLING ROAD
CUPERTINO
Prepared at the request of:
Colin Jung
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Prepared by:
Michael L. Bench
Consulting Arborist
September 22od, 2005
Job # 09-05-193
RECEIVED GCT 1 7 2005
s-)\
tXHlf)JT A
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE SHASHI lLC, SUBDIVISION SITE, 10752, 10758 S. STELLING ROAD, CUPERTINO 1
Assignment
I was asked by Colin Jung, City of Cupertino, to evaluate the trees located at Shashi LLC,
Subdivision Site, 10752, 10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, California.
The plan provided for this evaluation is the Tentative Map prepared by Criterium-Decker Engineers,
San Jose, California, Sheet A, dated 8-25-04. It displayed the existing conditions at the site. No plan
showing proposed construction was provided.
Summary
There are 26 trees included in this inventory. Of these 26 trees, 18 are located on this property, and 8
trees are located on the property toward the north on Orline Court.
The trees at this site protected by the City of Cupertino are Trees # 5, 7, 8, and 10.
However, I recommend that the 8 Italian cypress trees located on the neighboring property be treated
as protected trees.
Because we do not have plans showing proposed construction on site, a comprehensive tree
protection plan cannot be provided. However, suggested precautions are provided for the
preservation of the neighboring 8 Italian cypress trees and general tree preservation
recommendations, as well as suggested mitigation for underground utilities.
Observations
There are a total of26 trees included in this tree inventory. Of these, 18 are located on these two
parcels (Blasquez Family Trust, APN 359-22-061 and May Family Trust, APN 359-22-060)
proposed for a new subdivision. In addition to these, there are 8 trees located in a row adjacent to the
property boundary on the north side of the May Family Trust Site. Some of these 26 trees were not
shown on the map provided and have been added. The locations of these added trees are estimated
using visual references only. The attached map shows the locations of all 26 trees and their
approximate canopy dimensions.
The 26 trees are classified as follows:
Tree # I - Fruitless mulberry (Moros alba)
Tree # 2 - Samuel Sommer Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora 'Samuel Sommer ')
Trees # 3, 4, 16 - Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens)
Trees # 5, 7, 10 - Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara)
Tree # 6 - Victorian box (Pittosporum undulatum)
Tree # 8 - Blue atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica 'Glauca ')
Tree # 9 -Italian stone pine (Pinus pinea)
Tree # Ii - Australia bush cherry (Syzygium paniculatum)
Tree # 12 - Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
Trees # 13, 14, 15 - Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila)
Tree # 17 - Califomia black walnut (Juglans hindsii)
Tree # 18 - Apricot (Prunus armeniaca)
Tree # 19 - Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens): This number represents 8
specimens that are essentially identical for all practical purposes.
S-\~
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"", 2005
BV ALUA TION OF TREES AT THE SHASHl u.c, SUBDIVISION SITE, 10752, 1075S S. STELLING ROAD, CUPERTINO 2
The particulars of these trees (species, trunk diameter, height, spread, and structure) are included in
the attachments that follow this text.
The health and structure of each specimen is rated on a scale of 1-5 (Excellent - Extremely poor) on
the data sheets attached to this text. Based on these health and structure ratings combined, I have
given each tree an overall condition rating as follows:
Excellent
S cimens
9,12,19
Good
S ecimens
2,5,6,8,
16
Fair
S cimens
1,3,4,7,
10, II, 13,
14, 15, 17,
18
Poor
S cimens
Comments about Specific Trees
Trees # 1,7, 10, 13, 14, and 15 have been "topped". This very poor pruning procedure causes trees
to produce water waterspouts, which are inherently weak and prone to failure. 'Topping" also forces
greater energy to be diverted to side branches, which become longer and heavier than they would
have become normally. This makes these side branches also prone to failure. For these reasons, the
branching structures is of these trees is poor.
Tree # 17 is a large California black walnut (Jug/ans hindsii). The south half of the canopy is very
sparse and contains considerable dead wood. The north half of the canopy is relatively dense and
vigorous. Thus, the overall condition rating is only Fair.
Tree # 19 represents a row of 8 Italian cypress trees (Cupressus sempervirens). These trees are
located within 1 foot of the north side property boundary on the neighboring property.
If any of the Coast redwood Trees # 3, 4, or 16 would be preserved during construction, they would
likely decline if they are not irrigated throughout the construction period.
Protected Trees
The City of Cupertino (Chapter 14.18) " finds that the preservation of specimen and heritage trees on
private and public property, and the protection of all trees during construction, is necessary for the
best interests of the City and of the citizens and the public thereof." The City "finds it is in the public
interest to enact regulations controlling the care and removal of specimen and heritage trees..." A
"Heritage Tree" means "any tree or grove of trees which, because of factors, but not limited to, its
historic value, unique quality, girth, height or species, has been found by the Architectural and Site
Approval Committee to have a special significance to the community." A "Specimen tree" means any
of the following:
S-\~
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"", 2005
EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE SHASHl u.c, SUBDIVISION SITE. 10152, 10158 S. STELLING ROAD. CUPERTINO 3
Soedes Measurement from Sinale Trunk Multi-Trunk
Natural Grade DiameterlCircumference DiameterlCircumference
Oak trees; 4 Y2 feet 10 inches D (31 inches C) 20 inches D (63 inches C)
Califomia Buckeve
Big: LeafMaDle; 4 Y2 feet 12 inches D (38 inches C) 25 inches D (79 inches C)
Deodar Cedar;
Blue Atlas Cedar
The trees at this site protected by the City of Cupertino are Trees # 5, 7, 8, and 10.
Although the 8 neighboring Italian cypress trees, represented by # 19, are not defined as specimen
trees, I recommend that these trees be protected because of their importance as a partial screen
between these two properties.
Risks to Trees by Proposed Construction
If any earth work (excavation, trenching, grading) were to be done within 6 feet ofthe trunks of the 8
Italian cypress trees (# 19), their root systems may be damaged.
If any underground utilities are to be replaced or upgraded, it will be essential that the location of
trenches be planned prior to construction and those locations are shown on plans, and that the
trenches be dug at the locations shown on the plans.
If utilities would be installed underground, it would be essential that the trenches must be located a
minimwn distance of 5 times the trunk diameter from the trunks of trees provided all other sides of
the root zones of these trees would not be compromised by grading.
It is likely that the protected trees at this site would be at risk of damage by construction or
construction procedures that are common to most construction sites. These procedures may include
the dwnping or the stockpiling of materials over root systems, may include the trenching across the
root zones for utiliti~s or for landscape irrigation, or may include construction traffic across the root
system resulting in soil compaction and root die back.
Recommendations
The plans for the proposed new development have not been provided for this tree survey. For this
reason, it is not possible to access the impact to the protected trees at this site or to provide a Tree
Protection plan for their survival.
5-11
Prepared by: Michael 1. Bench, Consulting Arborist
September 22"', 2005
EVALUATION OF TREES AT TIlE SHASIll u.c, SUBDIVISION SITE, 10752, 1075& S. STELLING ROAD, CUPERTINO 4
However, I recommend that no earth work (excavation, trenching, grading, etc.) must be done within
6 feet of the trunks of the 8 Italian cypress trees (# 19).
Respectfully submitted,
.......
Michael L. Bench, Associate
~iJCñ4
Barrie D. Coate, Principal
MLB/sh
Enclosures:
Map
Tree Protection Infonnation
Typical Standard Footing Infonnation
Glossary
Tree Charts pages I - 2
5-\S
Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arherist
September 22'», 2005
BARRIE D. COATE
and ASSOCIATES
Horti cutural Consultants
23535 Summit Road
Los Getos. CA 95033
408135').1052
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. Any legal description provided to the appraiser/consultant is assumed to be correct.
No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character nor is any opinion rendered as to
the quality of any title.
2. The appraiser/consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for accuracy of
information provided by others.
3. The appraiser/consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason
of this appraisal unless subsequent written arrangements are made, including payment of an
additional fee for services.
4. Loss or removal of any part of this report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation.
5. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any
purpose by any other than the person(s) to whom it is addressed without written consent of
this appraiser/consultant.
6. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the
appraiser/consultant, and the appraiser's/consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the
reporting of a specified value nor upon any finding to be reported.
7. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, photos, etc., in this report, being intended as visual aids, are
not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys.
8. This report has been made in conformity with acceptable appraisal/evaluation/diagnostic
reporting techniques and procedures, as recommended by the International Society of
Arboriculture.
9. When applying any pesticide, fungicide, or herbicide, always follow label instructions.
1 O.No tree described in this report was climbed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take
responsibility for any defects which could only have been discovered by climbing. A full root
collar inspection, consisting of excavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root collar
and major buttress roots, was not performed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take
responsibility for any root defects which could only have been discovered by such an
inspection.
CONSULTING ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to
examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to
reduce risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations
of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.
Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand, Conditions are often
hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or
safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time, Likewise, remedial treatments,
like medicine, cannot be guaranteed,
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some
degree of risk, The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
cØ~.6J. ~
Barrie D. Coate
ISA Certified Arborist
Horticultural Consultant
s--\ lo
0<-<-
mg.g.
~':It::Z
en" CD
. C ) <03
-0 6 C )
'ãi'{'''
3...en
c-<o:::r
~ (.) ~
t\) :r.
'" r
0) r
_e. 0
'"
8
UI
...
"
tD
C )
-0 .:e-
ll> UI
fC \I
C )
-' ~
0
- ~
'" ~
í I I I I I I : : i -i
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ø
,~ Iw lex> I-.J 101 101 I.þ. it» :'" ,
10 1-' C )
I I I I , , I I ,
, , , , , , I I , I * S»-
, , . , , , , I , I ,
, , , , , , , ,
!~ :II '- 0 :~ Hi? :t! :s: ~ !a? ¡b> en ¡b' g> ~i&' ~ ''TI
",' :~ ! 'E:: ::;:t:1~ ~ 12
'0 <:: ,-. I", '0 o 10 '0 'II> 'II> ~ '§:3 ~ ,-.
Ie. ,II> Ie. Ie. !~ :~ 'co
'" '0) '» ~ ::J. <:: &Hi 'CD
I'" 12. !en I'" '''' 0 !::o I",
1- ,'" '" 1~ :::0 ¡¡;. =
I~ Hi) I~ , ..,- ~ I'" g:
'0 :J IÔ QI '0 2 100 Q. '0 !~ !S 'C ) 'S'en >
ICD CD I:] ¡¡¡: '''' IC ) ~ IC ) !~ 10 I:;:: -0 c.. ....
10 3 ,0 QI
'e. Q) ICD 'e. 'x '0. .g :313 'E:: iii' it! ~ i!2
I", ::s ICD :'" :'" r8 18 ,- ;a >
1-0 ~ § QJ3 'c- fti
~ 'e. ,~ ,~ ICD '" .....
,-. 'm , iiJ , 'e. '" 'e. ""CD '"
,0) QI I g- , ~ Z - r I;J c
C ) ~ , S ¡I' '" s;!. 0
<0 , ,
, ¡¡; , ¡;; , (¡¡' ~IŠ: , 3 ~ ¡¡¡ 1'"\ 1'"\
, , , , ¡[
, <:: , 2' , ::s ""m , CD ~ ;¡;::: 0
, , , "p ,
, £ , s , '" ·
, , , 3,0) , .....¡ >
, . , ,,'0 , ..... .....¡
· , , ~!5Y , '"
· , , · .....
· . . ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
, , 0 , 0
,~ ,~ ,~ '", ,~ ,~ ,~ , ,~
I'" :.:. :-.J It.) I-.J 1m I'" 1m 1<0 I", DIAMETER@ 4-1/2 FEET
, , , 0
~--.--- ------ ---.--- ------ ___.f___ ---10--- ___of___ ---..--- -----.....-- ___ o___ -~-(j-Ci'i:¡;-\i~i'-Ë~-------------------
, , I.¿" , I.¿" , , , , I.¿"
,.¿" , , , ,.¿" , ,
--f--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- ---+--- ---r--- -----+-- ---r--- --------------------------------------
, , o~ , , , , , , , s::
'-.J , 10 I , , 1-' I I 1-'
,- I 101 , CD
101 0 ,- , , I-.J , · :0 DBH
· I'" , , , , , ..
0 , f---..l--- , , , , , · (
-.--- ------ ---.--- -_....-- ------ ---1--- ___ o___ ------- ---..--- --------------------------------------
, , , , 0 , , · , , E::
, 0 0 , , , ,~ , · , ãI
1~ , '-.J , :~ , :~ , , 0
, !~ , , , , ,
:... , , I... , I~ , , , 3
, , , 0 , , DBH
, , , , , , 10 , , , CD
, , , , , , , , , --------------------------------------- 0)
---",--- --,.--- ---,--- --,.--- ---"1--- ~-~..~-- -~-,~~- ---,.--- ------r~- ---,.~--
, , · , , , , , , , DIAMETER @ 2 FEET iii'
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , 0 , , ,
---~--- -_..&._-- ___01___ ------ ___01___ ------- _~_0I___ --~...~-- ----~..&.~- --_...~--
:... I~ I... IUI I", I... 1m :0> IN I~ HEIGHT ESTIMATED
'0 'UI '01 '0 '01 '0 '0 '0 '0 'o.
---t--- --+--- ---t--- --+--- ---t--- --+--- ---i--- --+--- -----+-- ---r--- ---------------------------------------
'w .", 'w '... ,'" '... ,I\.) 0'" ,'" 'W SPREAD ESTIMATED
'UI '01 I'" 10 'UI '0 '01 10 'UI '0
, , , , , , , , , , HEALTH (1-5)
,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ I'" I'" IW I'" .~
, , , , , ,
---1--- ~~..L..___ ---+--- __..L___ ---i--- --_I..~-~ ---i--- --+--- __~__..L..~_ ---r-n ---------------~-----------~-------~-- 0
, , , ,
:... :-' :'" I... IN I... It» IN , I... STRUCTURE (1-5) 0
,~ 0)
, , , , , , , , , ,
---+-~- ------ -~-.--- ------ ---.--- ~--~--- _~_of___ ___ o___ -------- ___ o___ ------------------~------------------- Q.
, , , , , , , , , , ;:¡:
, , , , , , , , , , CONDITION RATING (2-10)
, , , 0 , , , ~-~~--~ 0 , õ
---f--- --+--- ---f--- --+--- ---;--- ---}.--- ---+--- -----+-- ---r--~ --~------~-------~-~-~---------------~ 0)
, , , , , , , , , HAZARD RATING (4-12)
, · , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , 0
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , CROWN CLEANING
, , , , , , , , , , "CI
, , , , , , , , , ,
---T~~- ---r--~ -~-T--- ---r--~ ---,--- ---1"--- ~-~,~-- --~I"'~~- ------r~- ---I"'~-- ~--------~---------------------------~ 2
0 , , , , , · , · , CROWN THINNING
, · , , , , , , , , 2-
0 , , · , , , · , ,
___.L___ -_..&.._-- _~_.L___ .......J..___ ___.I.......... -.....1..-...- ___J.~_... ......-..-...- ~____.J..._... ......_L_..._ -...-...-----...--...-...----............-...---...-...-...-...--- 0)
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , 0 CROWN RESTORATION 10
. , , , , , , 0 , , Õ
,~ , , , , , , , , ,- ---------------------------------------
--,,0 ~--r--- ---"~-,,, --........ ---,,~-- ----~- ...--,--- ---,.-...... ------r-... ---10
¡g , , ¡.g , , , , , ¡g CROWN RAISING ..
, · , , , , , !!:
, , __-'''is , , , , ,
---itO --+--- ---f--- ---i--- --+--- ---+--- --+--- -----+-- ___'CD ---------------------------------------
'CD Ie. S-
Ie. , , Ie. , , , , , REMOVE END-V\iEIGHT
, , , , , , , , 10
, , , ~_":m , , , , , ·
..._+-~- ---...-- ---+--- ...--..--- ------ -_.....--- -_......--- --...----- ---...--- --...-...-----...-----...-------...----...------...- Z
, , , ,- , , , , · ,
, , , I'" , , , , , , CABLES NEEDED # CD
, --+- , , , , , , , CD
--f--- ---+--- --4q ---+--- , ---j--- ---~--- , ---r--- --------------------------------------
---f"'--- ------r-- e.
, , , , 0 , , , , , PRUNING PRIORITY (1-5) ..
, · , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, : I I T , ,
, , , , ,
0 , , , , , , 0 , · "CI
, , , , , , , , , , INSECTS (1-5)
, , , · , , , , , , CD
, · , , , , , , , ,
---+-~- -~---~ ---.-~- -----~ -...-.-...... ...---...... ___of__'" ..._~...--- -_......_-~- -"'-r--~ ~_..._-_..._----~_......_-----_..._......_~~-~----_... ..
, , , , , , 0 , , TRËE CROWN <!:
, , , , , , , , , , DISEASE (1-5)
, , , , , ---~--- , , , , C
---f--- --+--- ---+--- ---}.--- ---;--- ___;_n ---}.--- -----+-- ---}.--- ~--_..._---_...-_............_-----_..._---_...-_...__...- ..
, , , , , , , , , 0 _C?_~C?_~_<?_C?_¡!:?)________________ CD
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ..
-...-+-...- ~~....-_... -~~+~-~ -~....--- _...-..~...- ---...--- ~--..--- ---...~~- ...----....-- ---...--... ..
, , , , , , , · , ·
, , , , , , · , , , TRUNK DECAY(1-5) CD
, , · , , , , · , ·
, , , ~--+_...... , , , , , , "CI
-"'-T--'" ---r-"'- ---T--'" ~--,_...- --...,..-...... ..._...,-~... -~-,.--- ------r-- ---I'"~~- --~-~-_...~-~----------~------~---~~~_...- ~
, , , , , , , , , ,
I , I , , , I , , , 0
, , , · , , , , , , c-
o , , , , , , , , , ~9..9_~_c::~~~E9..':!~~_'=~j!:~L_
, , , , , , , · , , ..
---+--- --+--- ---;--- ~__+m ---;--- --+--- ---+--- --+--- -----+-- ---r--- 3
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , . , , , , , ROOT COLLAR DISEASE (1-5) ..
, , , , , , , , , ,
0 , , , , , , , 0 ,
, , , , , , , , , , ~EEDS WATER(1-5)
, · , , . , , , , , :0
, · , , , , , , , ,
. , , , , , · , , , CD
-"'-T--- ---r"'-- ---,--- ...-T......... ---,--- ~--,...._- --~,~-- ---t"...~- ------r-~ -~...t"--- --~-~-_..._..._--~-~..._----------_..._------~
, , , , , , , , , · ~EEDS FERTILIZER n
, , , , , , , , , , 0
, , , , , , , , , ,
-.........--... _~....L._...... ___.1._..._ __...L._..._ ..._...0I~...... --............- __...01__... ......_.._...~ ---...-....-- --.....--- --------------------------------------- 3
, , , , , , , · , ,
, , , , , , , , , , RECOMMEND REMOVAL 3
, , 0 , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , · , CD
--"'T-~- ---r"''''- --...,--- .......,..-..- ......-,...-- ......-...-- ---,-...- --~,..--- --"'--"'T'"-- ...-...,.--... ..._--_......__..._-----_......_-_..._......__...__...~_......_- 0)
, , , , , , , , , , REMOVAL PRIORITY (1-3)
I , , I , , , , , , Q.
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , HERITAGE TREE? !!.!
, , I , , , , I
, , , , , 0 ..
-
PROTECTED TREE? c
..
':;1-11-'
0<-<-
~g.g.
.. ~:z
cn~m
CO 63
'" co
'ãi '!'..
3-cn
"'co'"
co e.> '"
, U>
N ;;r.
'" r
::> r
_0. ()
'"
8
'"
-
"
IJ
co
"U ~
ID '"
IQ "
co
'" ~
s¡, ,
'" ~
I I , , , I -i
, I , I , I
I I I , I , ,
- ~ ~ I~ .~ I~ ,~ I~ ,~ <1>
<0 co -.¡ :m :'" :.¡:.. :e.> iN :~ <1>
I I I I , , 'II: S»-
I , , , 0 ,
, , , , , ,
~ !!I ~ ~ c... () ¡g :~ :m i J~ j!~ ~ 0>
~ ID 'cr 'cr 'cr Ie
iif '" ::>. "" I~ 1(1) :(1) 1(1) . '¡; :!!l
::> c:: 0 0 ;::J. '::>. i~' CI) :-. Jñl
g '" 3 1- !~ U> 't> '3
'" ~ '" '" :::0 ,ID ~ :3 c::' ,= ~
'" ,::> 'tJ ,::> I'" !
c:: .. "" iii' '<1> , , c:: , 3
§ !î om :m 'm '0 1m "U
'" S· IJ 0- 3 ,- I::> 'tJ Q.. ='"
a :3 '3 13 'e iij' it! - 2!:!
fß CD ª' iij' 10 "" S , .. 'u> ª >
u> · .. , , ::. ;:¡, í1:::
::. 0 '0 , , .¡:¡' , i::T '" .....
~ U> ¡¡¡. -, '" 10. , , , õ' I() . ~ w '"
, , S· , z - i :='
2 ~ , , , , c:: I", '" 1'. ¡;; 0
CD , , , of , ¡¡;
< , 0 , , 'CD 3 ~ ¡¡¡ ('"'\
ID , , , '" , e- " H ('"'\
~. 5' , · , .. , f< CD ~ ;;; 0
, , , , '3
S- , , , : -I >
::. , , , ,
'" , , , , , ..... -I
, , , , , '"
, , , , , .....
, , . , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
~ ¥: '", Iw ,N I'" , ,~
0> 0 :'" 10 :'" ,'" 10> :0 DIAMETER@ 4-1/2 FEET
, , ,
--- -- --- , --- --- --- ~~ ---þo--- ___-t___ ---..--- ------ ---.¡.--- ------ -~-(j-Ci'i:s¡ii13i'~~-------------------
k§ ..... I..... · , , :..... ,
, ---~--- , '.....
--- --- --- --- -- --- ---f--- --+-- ---+-- --1--- --+- --------------------------------------
· , , , , , 3:
~ I~ , , , '''' I~
0> "1 , , , !è;3 CD
10> , , , 10 DBH
· , , II
, , ..._-~--- , , . co
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---..--- ------ ------ ___to___ ------ --------------------------------------
· , : , , , I:
, 0 , , , ñ1
'" , , , , :~ ,
, , , , ,
- , , I , Iw I 3
'" , · , DBH
, · I , I : CD
--- --- --- --- --- , , , --------------------------------------- "
--- --- --- .....-r--- --...,--- ---r--- ---....-- ---..--- ---..,..--
, , , , , , DIAMETER @ 2 FEET õI'
, , , , , ,
, , , , , ,
--- -- --- --- --- --- --- _n _--10--- ---..1--- ___10--- ---,, --- ___L___ ---......--
... ~ ... 1m I... :w :... :~ Iw HEIGHT ESTIMATED
0 '" 0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '''' '0
--- -- --- --- --- --- ---I-n ---,-- _nl___ ---+-- ---1--- ---+-- --------------------------------------
0> '" '" ,w 18\ '... '... ,'" ,~ SPREAD ESTIMATED
0 '" '0 :0 '", '", ''''
, , , , , , _~~~~!_~_s~:~L_____m___m_____
~ w w :'" ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ :'"
, ~--~~-- , ---t---
-- n_ --- -- --- --- -- --- ---1--- ___,n_ ___.J___ ---+-- 0
,
~ ~ w , :... I... I... :~ :'" STRUCTURE (1-5) 0
,~ "
, --~..:--- ---~--- ---..:--- ---~--- ---..:...--
_n --- -- --- -- n_ --- -- ___t-___ -------------------------------------- Q.
, , , , , , ::;:
, , , · , , CONDITION RATING (2-10)
· , , · , , õ
--- --- --- --- --- --- -- n_ ---~-- ___~n- ---1-- --+-- ---t--- , --------------------------------------
---,--- "
, , , , I HAZARD RATING (4-12)
, , , , ,
0 , , , , ,
· , : , , !
, , , , CROWN CLEANING
, , : , : ...
, , , ---------------------------------------
-- n_ --- -- --- _n --- --- ---r--- ---i--- ---¡--- -~-,--- ---r--- ---T-- 2
, , CROWN THINNING
, , , , , , "
, , , , , ,
--- n_ --- --- n_ _n n_ --- ___1.___ ___.J___ ___L___ ___..J...__ ---1.--- ___..L.__ --------------------------------------- :;
, , , , , ,
, , , , , , CROWN RESTORATION <e.
0 , , , , ,
, , ---: , , , 0
--- --- -- OJ n_ --- --- --- ---1"--- ---., ---., ---.,.--- ---..,..-- --------------------------------------
, ,- ,- ,- , , CROWN RAISING ID
, fg '0 fg , , 5!:
ã , ---¡:g , ,
--- n_ --- --- _n _n --- ---1--- --,." n-+U ---In- ---+-- --------------------------------~----- :;
CD , 'CD '11> 'CD , , REMOVE END-WEIGHT
, 10. ---:0- 10. , , IQ
2).. · , ,
--- n_ --- --- -- --- --- ---þ--- ---.. ---.. ---..--- ---i-- -------------------------------------- Z
, , , , ,
, , , , , , CABLES NEEDED # CD
, , , , , , CD
--- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---1--- ---1--- , ---+-- ---1--- ,
---r--- ---,.--- -------------------------------------- 0.
, , i · , , PRUNING PRIORITY (1-5) ..
, , , , :
, , , ,
, ¡ , : :
, , ,
, : : : : ...
, INSECTS (1-5)
· , , , : CD
, , , , , ..
-- --- n_ --- mr-- --- n_ ---þ--- ---.,--- ___t-___ ------ ---r--- ---.....-- --------------------------------------
, 0 , , : ct
, , , , , TREE CROWN DISEASE (1-5) c
, , , , , ,
--- --- --- --- n_ --- ---fn- ---l~-- ---f-n ---Tn --In- , -------------------------------------- ¡¡
::r: , , , , ---Tn DEAD VVOOD (1-5) CD
, : I ___J.__ I
, , II
-- n_ n_ m n_ _n ___10___ ---~--- ___10___ ---..--- ---.....-- -------------------------------------- ..
, : , , , ,
, , , , , TRUNK DECAY(1-5) CD
, , , : , ,
--- --- n_ n_ m --- _n , , , , · ...
--- ---r--- ---.,--- ---r--- ~--.,--- ---r--- ---T-- --------------------------------------
· , , , , a
· , , , , :
, , , , , C'
· , , , , , ROOT COLLAR COVERED (1-5) ..
, , ---t--- , , -~~~---
--- n_ --- n_ --- _n n_ --- ---fn- ---+-- ---+-- _nln_ --------------------------------------- 3
, , , , , ,
, , , , , , ROOT COLlAR DISEASE 11-5) ..
· , : · : ·
, , , ·
, , , , , , ~~~~~_~~~~_~S~:~L___________
, , : , : , ~
, , , ,
--- --- --- n_ --- n_ -- --- , , , , , , CD
---r--- ---,--- ---r--- ---,--- ---r--- ---,..--
0 , , , , : ~~~~~_~~~]:_~~~~~_____m_______ n
, : : , , 0
· 0 , ,
--- --- --- n_ --- --- --- --- ---1.--- ---..1--- ---1.--- ---..1...-- ---.1.--- ---.....-- 3
, , , , , :
0 , , , , RECOMMEND REMOVAL 3
, , : , , I
, , , , CD
--- --- --- _n --- -- --- --- ---1'--- ---.,--- ---r--- ---.,..-- ---¡--- ---..,..-- -------------------------------------- "
, , , , , REMOVAL PRIORITY (1-3)
, , , , , , Q.
, , , , , ,
, , , : HERITAGE TREE? !!.!
, , ,
, , , , ID
-
i PROTECTED TREE? I:
..
6-,9
BARRIE D. COATE AND ASSOCIATES
Horticultural Consultants
(408) 353-1052
Fax (408) 353-1238
23535 Summit Rd. Los Gatos, CA 95033
GLOSSARY
Co-dominant (stems, branches) equal in size and relative importance, usually associated with
either the trunks or stems, or scaffold limbs (branches) in the crown.
Crown - The portion of a tree above the trunk including the branches and foliage.
Cultivar - A named plant selection from which identical or nearly identical plants can be
produced, usually by vegetative propagation or cloning.
Decurrent - A term used to describe a mature tree crown composed of branches lacking a central
leader resulting in a round-headed tree.
Excurrent - A term used to describe a tree crown in which a strong central leader is present to
the top of a tree with lateral branches that progressively decrease in length upward rrom the base.
Girdling root - A root that partially or entirely encircles the trunk and/or large buttress roots,
which could restrict growth and downward movement of photosynthates.
Inclnded bark - Bark which is entrapped in narrow-angled attachments of two or more stems,
branches, or a stem and branch(es). Such attachments are weakly attached and subject to splitting
out.
Kinked root - A taproot or a major root(s) which is sharply bent and can cause plant instability
and reduction of movement of water, nutrients, and photosynthates.
Root collar - The flared, lower portion of the base of a tree where the roots and stem merge.
Also referred to as the "root crown".
Leader - The main stem or trunk that forms the apex of the tree.
Stem - The axis (trunk of a central leader tree) of a plant on which branches are attached.
Temporary brancbes - A small branch on the trunk or between scaffold branches retained to
shade, nourish, and protect the trunk of small young trees. These branches are kept small and
gradually removed as the trunk develops.
Definition of Woody Parts
Trunk - The main stem of a tree between the ground and the lowest scaffold branch.
Scaffold brancbes - In decurrent trees, the branches that form the main structure of the crown.
Limb - A major structural part.
Brancb - A smaller part, attached to a limb or scaffold branch.
Brancblet - A small part, attached to a branch.
Twig - A very small part attached to a branch let.
Leaf - The main photosynthetic organ of most plants.
5-\'1
II Do Not Use Near Trees
U ' Concrete Footing
Existing
. . Grade ')
, '. Formed .~ 1l.....~: 'Þl'("~""~' -"
.~ (I .rI'~J: . "l~t~~~;¡.¡~<>-~::
-;-:."." 'Ä'lã': 'Formed By Trench ' '~~/q'''''~i-::-':
.' ., I ~.. ", .... , -..L....a.::: ¡ I I .
/" ./ / / ~. "'..... 7'" ,¡ ~l I Q~/ t .'
::::: . / / 7/ ~ '~. .. :. . ./p¡ '5::..~o/ ill ;;:
...·_-""/I~..../D'--~-·,·· /T("-:,_(Ol~,
-. ;," /~ q .:::: . -d,/í_:~:>'//~/ /;/;.:.;// j:;f ~::'/¡7' ~~/1/i .
-~.. /1'" Tf,/ .////-""bJ' ,1/__.1/......_ .j
BARRIE D. COATE
AND ASSOCIATES
Horticultural Consultants
(408) 353·1052
23535 Summit Road
Los Gatos, CA 95033
! I
11
Typical Rebar
Typical Standard Footing
For Foundation Or Other Use
! I
Ii
Majority Of Roots
Severed At Edge
Of Trench
(All Roots Outside
Of Trench Die)
/0~~~1&:.. ~', ~ ·l~~··~~. .fig; : ~. :¡¡Il~~' \,' . ~¡:'§:-
~~~ ., '&fl"~~{-¿J5!5.. \..: ~'/9JJ~~~(.l'¡,~¡' .V'.'
.:::-.:::: ( . . J ' I~ --: -,..; . ~/tt, -. / (Ir" b . li_
///~~y{ I ,7/1'~ /11 ~" 'f:¿/ " //~::::.~/,b--./·I ,-::::-' . 0,:::',
- . ~- --"//'/ ~ .. ,./ - I -~----- , I -..' ,
/ -,....,.- - ' " --. / -., '- , .
- ) 11-:-b.J.. . .. --. 11 ~ . ,.. .,..."$,. . - ./,,' I
- /í;. - / / ~ I I .::: _~. / ~... I ,... --_". . __ _ , .-. -. ~ ~
- . .:::::.//1 ~i( !æ_'_~~¡ j. ::=:='ll,¡,/ :o:~:-/!?¡c:::..:.~' .J:/ / I..::¡:..-I/:./..:
'(" Roots are Sever~d '. I
Only at Pier LOC~ J
Concrete Spans (typical)
Must Be On-Top
of Existing Grade.
S-;)o
Typical Reba~
Existing
Grade
.
Pier and On-Grade Footing
IJ
I
Concrete
Footing
- -
. . , . ft
- .
. .
... .. , ;
. .
., ,
. .
11
BARRIE D. COATE AND ASSOCIATES
Horticultural Consultants
(408) 353-1052
Fax (408) 353-1238
23535 Summit Rd. Los Gatos, CA 95033
TREE PROTECTION BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION
These are general recommendations
And may be superseded by site-specific instructions
BEFORE
Plan location of trenching to avoid all possible cuts beneath tree canopies. This includes trenches
for utilities, irrigation lines, cable TV and roof drains.
Plan construction period fence locations which will prevent equipment travel or material storage
beneath tree canopies.
Install fences before any construction related equipment is allowed on site. This includes pickup
trucks.
Inform subcontractors in writing that they must read this document. Require return of signed
copies to demonstrate that they have read the document.
Prune any tree parts, which conflict with construction between August and January. Except for
pines which may be pruned between October-January. Only an ISA certified arborist, using
ISA pruning instructions may be used for his work. Iflimbs are in conflict with the
construction equipment before the certified arborist is on-site, caIpenters may cut off
offending parts of 6" diameter or less, leaving an 18" long stub, which should be re-cut later
by the arborist.
Under no circumstances may any party remove more than 30% of a trees foliage, or prune so
that an unbalanced canopy is created.
DURING
Avoid use of any wheeled equipment beneath tree canopies.
Maintain fences at original location in vertical, undamaged condition until all contractors and
subcontractors, including painters are gone.
Clear root collars of retained trees enough to leave 5-6 buttress roots bases visible at 12" from
the trunk
Irrigate trees adjacent to construction activity during hot months (June-October). Apply 10
gallons of water per I" of trunk diameter (measured at 4 Y2) once per 2 week period by
soaker hose. Apply water at the drip line, or adjacent to construction not around the trunk.
Apply mulch to make a 3" deep layer in all areas beneath tree canopies and inside fences. Any
organic material which is non toxic may be used.
AFTER
Irrigate monthly with 10 gallons of water per I" oftrunk diameter with a soaker hose, placed just
inside the dripline. Continue until 8" of rain has fallen.
A void cutting irrigation trenches beneath tree canopies.
A void rototilling beneath tree canopies since that will destroy the small surface roots which
absorb water.
A void installation of turf or other frequently irrigated plants beneath tree canopies.
S-~\
31
·~
CITY OF
CUPERJINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(40S) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Commumry Development Deparrment
November 28, 2005
Dipesh Gupta
Shashi LLC
20380 Town Center Lane #135
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - TM-2005-12
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the
meeting of November 22, 2005, approving a Tentative Map to subdivide a 22,566
net square foot parcel into 2 (two) parcels of approximately 7,4S6 and S,744
square feet, located at 10758 S. Stelling Road), according to Planning Commission
Resolution No. 6341.
Please be aware that if the Tentative Map permit is not used within a three-year
period, it shall expire on November 22, 200S.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 10 calendar
days from the date of this letter. If this happens, you will be notified of a public
hearing, which will be scheduled before the City Council.
Sincerely,
. _.---7)
J' ¿----~
.-----1 .^"~ .,-:.----:-
Piu Ghosh
Assistant Planner
Cc : Leroy & Beatrice May, 10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino CA 95014
G: \ Planning \ Post Hearing \ Action Letters \ action letter tm200512.doc
TM-2005-12
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6341
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A TENT A TIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 22,566 NET SQUARE FOOT
PARCEL INTO TWO PARCELS OF APPROXIMATELY 7,486 AND 8,744 SQUARE
FEET AT 10758 S. STELLING ROAD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: TM-2005-12
Applicant: Dipesh Gupta, dba Shashi, LLC
Owner: Leroy and Beatrice May
Location: 10758 S. Stelling Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the
Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning
Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino
General Plan.
b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent
with the General Plan.
c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development
contemplated under the approved subdivision.
d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage nor injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat.
e) That the designs of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated
therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application TM-2005-12 for a Tentative Map is hereby
approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
page 2 thereof, and
Resolution No. 6341
Page 2
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application TM-2005-12, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of
November 22, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The approval is based on exhibits titled: "Shashi, LLC, Two lot subdivision,
10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 2 sheets, dated October 19,
2005, labeled C2 and C4 dated November 08, 2005, except as may be amended by
the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. DEMOLITION
The applicant is required to demolish existing structures in accordance with City
demolition procedures.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS:
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period
complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
4. COVENANT FOR TREE PROTECTION
The applicant shall prepare and record a covenant that runs with the land, prior
to final map approval, acknowledging the protective status of the redwood and
the three Siberian Elms, notifying future property owners of the kinds and
numbers of trees protected by City Ordinance and the requirement for a tree
removal permit for these trees. The covenant shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney.
All protected trees on site shall be fenced off during construction, watered on a
regular basis and no trenching shall be done within 6' of the tree trunks.
In the event that any trees need to be relocated or removed due to required
improvements, a tree removal application may be made to the Director of
Community Development.
5. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant, prior to approval of the final map, shall provide a tree protection
bond in the amount of $10,000 to ensure protection of existing trees on the site.
G: IPlanningIPDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005-12 res. doc
Resolution No. 6341
Page 3
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
----------~------------------~----------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
The bond shall be returned after recordation of the final map, subject to a letter
from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition.
6. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING
Applicant shall comply with the policies in the City's Below Market Rate
Housing Manual.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
7. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
8. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed In
accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
9. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
10. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Fire, if needed.
11. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance
with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404
permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or
Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
12. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Pre- and post development calculations shall be submitted to the City. Runoff
shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
13. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of
the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
14. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking
and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for
G: IPlanning\PDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005-12 res. doc
Resolution No. 6341
Page 4
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of
construction permits.
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees:
$ 5% of Off-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,130.00 minimum
$ 6% of On-Site Improvement
Cost or $2,000.00 minimum
$ 1,000.00
TBD
N/A
$ 3,250.00
$ 15,750.00
By Developer
b. Grading Permit:
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:
d. Storm Drainage Fee:
e. Power Cost:
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
h. Street Tree
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off & On-site Improvements
c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
d. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee
schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein
may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a
building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at
that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
15. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located
underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
16. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES
The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances
installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for
water service to the subject development.
17. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP
plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion
and or sediment control plan shall be provided.
G: IPlanningIPDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005-12 res. doc
Resolution No. 6341
Page 5
TM-2005-12
November 22, 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 California Government Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV of
this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices.
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Wong, Vice-Chari Miller, Saadati, Chen
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I s/Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Is/Gilbert Wong
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \PlanningIPDREPORTiRESI2005ITM-2005- J 2 res. doc
INT-2005-02
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6342
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN INTERPRET A TION OF FRONT YARD FACING JOLL YMAN LANE FOR
A FUTURE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 19.0S.030 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an
interpretation, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) That design relationships with adjacent yards and buildings, and the protection of
specimen trees would be improved by interpreting the front yard as facing Hillcrest Road
as shown in the below referenced drawing; and
2) That design relationships would be improved by interpreting them consistently with the
existing neighborhood design and lot orientation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for an interpretation is hereby recommended for
approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page
2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. INT-2005-
01 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005 and
are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein.
Resolution No. 6342
Page-2-
INT-2005-02
November 22, 2005
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Location:
INT-2005-02
Dipesh Gupta (Shashi LLC)
Leroy & Beatrice May
10758 S. Stelling Road
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "Shashi LLC, Two lot
Subdivision, 10758 S. Stelling Road, Cupertino, CA." consisting of one sheet labeled C2,
except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
2. SIDE YARD SETBACKS
Applicant shall propose side yard setbacks that are no less that 6' from any protected
trees.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Chen
Giefer
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I s/Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Is/Gilbert Wong
Gilbert Wong, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G' IPlanning\PDREPORTiRESI2005\INT-2005-02.doc
~
~
!
·
~
~
,
~
~
~
~
~
·
I
~
~
·
,
,
~
,
e
~
·
·
,
,
!
·
~
¡
!
·
,
e
,
,
~
·
!
!
~
·
¡
!
j
,
1
~
·
¡
,
i
,
¡
¡
\
!
,
I
,
~
~
,
,
i
~
~.. """0
- -
oo/22¡œ~j, > >UCþ,1ØI
1D/M/05 PI.J.hNNG 1OØII1,1,1.
10/18/05 Pl.AlHNCRE9J9IIITlAl
UJ
::;) on
'" Z
w ~ '"
'" ~
:rl on
'"
o Z ðg:
, ...J on
:¡: ¡Q ª '" -0;'
:::JW OWLO
· ;!W:¡N~OO
0
· u.JZ ~,..,CO
· ~C3~ Z~
~ uf5~~~......
.....
ci
'"
is,,
¡nZ
5:J
¡s-'
I~<r: Q.
""
ffitf)U :¡:
::3 ~ ,0 W
--11---(f)~ >
s::SOCJ6;: ~ ¡:ë
1. tf) "'w 1'"
« 0 1"'--0.... ! Z
~ ::c 3= Q:=J ~
(/) I-....-U
~
JobNo.;
-,...
Dn.w:a8T- ro
Pro~tArclll_N/A
Cbeet<edlly; ..
rueKoo.ø>oC2.dwq
P1aI. Daw 16-2C-2\X15
- -
1_~IJo.: -
C2
,
J
BlJLD~G aJ1tJN'E /7777"r'/~7~/?777/7r?
5'CONTOURINTERV.<!.-1(1)-
1·CONTOURINTER........~'01-
ŒNTffilINE
FENCE - rn>E NOTEO- - >-
GASLJN£ G-
O'ÆRliEAO UNE OIl 0It--
PlAN RIGH-OF-WAY UNE- - - - -
RECORDBOONDAAY
S/oNITIIRYSFIIEJI_SS---SS-
WATERUN[ w-
PROPOSEDPROP£RTY
--- RETAINI~G wm
.. BORE HOlE LOCATION
. WATER VAL'Æ
""
n;.<N~ : M'-H(; SPOTELEV.o.TION&DfSCRIPT1ON
~ .'"
b SURI/EYCONTROL
0 TREE \IoITH DRIP UHf.:
2005
1
: OrT ')
,
I ,c.. .
~.
TRACT NO. 7801
557 MAPS 24 & 25
=,
RI"'_2B~6B
INV ~. P1PE IN. FLs277.1Z'
ItIV ~. PJPE IN. FL_277,'2'
ItIV~· PIPE IN. Fl~2n.12·
INV ~. PIPE 'N. F1._¡n,12'
ItIV8"PIPEOUT,FL-277.12'
IIlMw'21W.Ø"
INV12"PIPEIN,Fl_280.JI'
INV12"PIPEIN,fl._2IID.20'
INVI2"PI!'EOUT,Fl.280,10'
':A .fL~lII4.20'
~";~O\IECRATE
.1 \
\
18"~ - ----æ
_lIIO:ro' ~
,Fl_200.W
Fl_279.9J' í
Fl_279.7'9'
LEGAL OWNER AS FOLLOWS; TENT A TIVE MAP PREPARER EXISTING TREES BASIS OF BEARINGS UTILITY NOTE
- -
lNIDS TO BE SUB-DlVIO£D ARE O'ØIED B~ TENTATIVE ~AP PREPARED BT AI.i. O1S1UIG lRŒS SHOIIIN IIMlI'IIN TliE SUB.£CT PROPERTY lI1EElEARlNGSSHO'MIUPON THIS MAP AREBA$ED UPON THE THE UT\UTlESSHO'fIIoI ON lHIS~APAliEDœ1~rRCI6ISURI'AŒ
-, "llAAOoe:CKER.R.C.E._2~,EXf'.0E:c.31,·œ. UNES WILL BE RÐIO\UI CENTERlJItEOfAL1\jANlHIE AS roJNDWONUloIElfJEDANDSliOIltlA$ œsERVA l1ON. ACTIJAL LOCA l10N AND 9ZE. TOG£1HER 'MTH TIlE
J5t-22-060,t£ROYfi.AIOOElEA'fRICEfi.WAT EASTUI'OHTHATCERTAlNlRACTIoIAI>NO.7ð01,F1l£DFORR£COROA$ PR~CEOFANYADOlllONALUl1UTYUI< £SNOTSHOWNONTHISPLAH,
TRUST,107511SOUl1-lS1ElJ..llolG~,CUPERl1I1O,CA BOOK ~7 Of ~APS AS PAGE 15, SAJjTA CLARA COUNTY RECMOS. SHAI.i. BE 'ÆR1F1£D IN THE F1ElJ) BY THt CONTRACTOR DURlNO
CCI<IS1IIUOTlON.
,
RlM-2115.8;
INVIS" PiPE PN,Fl_278,H'
INV IS" PIP( IN, FL~278.4;
INVIS"PIP(OUT.Fl-278.4;
.,
~
~ - (0 - ----wsó-
~
~I ',,/,
II 1. \~«>
- --G- ',<_
,
D
a
e
".
.1
,
.1
,
~
·
·
·
/'
~..
'",
~~
'.1"
'"'
I
PARCEL MAP
561 MAPS 44
20'
8
I ~v~: =-,"".,'~.
, till' ,IÆ:x.',Nr.!'R C', ~Nn '"
I ¡(}';'j£ ßGUlit B~!:¡,[,:NC RTJ
cUptRTlNn,CA95CJ'.
RECORD OF SÚRvt.y
286 MAPS 28 '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
8
f
.
<5'
I
.
h
~
w
\>
"
p
8
z,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
LEGEND
AC ASPHAlT1CCONCR(11:
Ace ,S'HIOIiASPHALl1CCONCRE11:BERM
ACf' ASPHALT CONCR£1£ PAVEMENT
IV' ANGLE PONT
BIKE ElIKE LANE STRIPING
EllDG ElUILDlNG
BORE ElOREHOlELOCAl1ON
ElOW ElACK OF WAlK
CEI CATCHElASlN
Cl CENTUlUNE
COR CORNER
CONC CONCRETe:
DASH DASHED UN£ STRIPING
DI DRAlNAGEINL£T
DUTE DA'l'UOIiT
DWY DRI'Æ WAY
ELEC ELECTI!lCAL
E-RjS ELEClRICAlRISER
ELECT ELECTROl.IER
£F' EDGE DrPA'V£IoIENT
rn FQVND
FF fiNISHED FlOCIRELEVAllON
FH fiRE HYDRANT
fL flOW UNE
G!! GRADESREAK
HP HIGH POiNT
~~T ~: :iÁ~GE VAULT 45'
INV IN'V£RT
JT JOINT TRENCH
UP UP OF GUmR
ME MATCH ÐOSTlNG
MH MANHOlE
t.«)N MONUMENT
NotS NAlLotSHINER
NG NATURAl GROUND
01.. OUTlET
POL POINT ON UNE
PM PAINT t.lARK - TYPE NorrD
PW POTABLE WATER
REFl REfLECTl'V£ElUTTONSTRIPING
st'IMH STORMORAINMANHOI.£
$LB STREETUGHTElOX
sauD SOLID UNE STR1PING
Sf> ( SPIKE
55 SNjITARYSEWER
SSCO SANITARY SEWER ClEAN OUT
SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOlE
SW SIDEWAlK
TFC TOP OF CUREI AT FACE
TOG TOP OF CRAOE
TOW TOP OF WAlL
.",T VAULT
W WATER
'M.t WATER METER
)~/~~$
!:."
-r¡v/-_~!!i25...::(~1
::;.'
~,
--
.
21~,OO'
- ',,,,,,b,,,
,:t,
.
NV1I1" PIP£ 1HRIJ,Fl_280.07'
ISBA5EQ
21,AN:I
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
'!HIS ~AP VIAS Pl!EPAAED BYW( 011 l.M:IERMY DjRECTK»I AND
(» A fiELD SUR\'EY PERnJRN£D ON AUWST 19, 2000, AOGIJST
SEPTE~BER 4, 2D06.
om
CUIIl1SC. CHAPPELL, P.LS.
UCf\'lSENIJMIIER7fi2
BENCHMARK
11-£ 'otRl1CAl OAlI.I~ FIJI THIS SITE ¡S BASEOUf'ON s.ANTA C1AAA
VIdJ.EY WATI'R { jSTftlCT 1ItN00~ARK NUwBER _2 AT '!HE SCI!mrIlES
CORNER CF ~ceu:1.1.AH ROAD ANO SOOTH SlElUNG ROAD.
E1.£VA11QN.2I7.44'
EXISTING BUILDINGS
All EXlS~NO BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES. PATIos. '" DR!VE\fAYS
SHOJOIII< IIMTHIN THESIJII.ECT PROPERlY 10 BE REIIIO'ÆIJ.
LAND USE
EJQSTlNO_9NOlEF.....lYRESU)ENl1A.l
P!«IPOSED_SIIo!Q.EFAWlLYRESIOEJ'Il1Al
I
, SUB-DIVIDER
THERE9DENllA.lLOTSUB_Dl"'90HISSEINOOONEBTDlPESHOlIPT....
08ASHAStIIu.c.2Il3IICTOWNCEN1UII..AM£,SlJlTE1~.CUPDtl1NO.CA.
<5'
".
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: EXC-2005-17, DIR-2005-28 Agenda Date: November 22, 2005
Applicant: Cal Com Systems (for Verizon Wireless)
Property Owner: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Property Location: 10110 California Oak Way (PG&E Monta Vista Substation)
Project Data:
General Plan Land Use Designation: Quasi-Public/InStitutional
Zoning: A-Agriculture
Existing Land Use: electrical substation
Height of Existing Utility Pole: 82 feet
Maximum Antenna Height: 55 feet
Proposed Panel Antennas' Height: 94 feet
Closest Distance to Residential Property Line: 580 feet
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION with REFERRAL to the Planning
Commission (file no. DIR-2005-28) to install six (6) 4' x l' panel antennas of a
personal wireless service facility to be mounted to a proposed structural
extension to an existing 82-foot tall P.G.&E. transmission tower, and the
installation of related ground equipment shelter.
HEIGHT EXCEPTION (file no. EXC-2005-17) to allow the six panel antennas to
be mounted at a height of 94 feet - twelve feet above a 82-foot tall P.G.&E.
transmission tower.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of DIR-2005-28 and EXC-2005-17 per the model
resolutions.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Cal Com Systems, representing Verizon Wireless, is proposing to
install a personal wireless service facility at the P.G.&E. Monta Vista electrical
substation with six proposed antennas (4' x 1') mounted to a structural extension
to be erected twelve feet above an existing 82-foot tall P.G.&E. transmission
tower (Exhibit A). The antennas are a collocation on a tower that currently hosts
two other wireless carriers: Sprint PCS and Cingular Wireless. The tower is
centrally located in the substation and is surrounded by residential uses to the
north, east and south at the distances indicated on the aerial photograph.
Rancho San Antonio Park and the Gate of Heaven Cemetery are located to the
west.
to -I
EXC-2005-17, DlR-2005-28
Page 2
November 22, 2005
Personal Wireless Facility Location Photograph with
Distances to Residential Property Lines
. Personal Wireless Service Facility Location
Discussion:
Existing & Approved Facilities. Four wireless communication companies: Sprint
PCS, Cingular Wireless, T-Mobile and Metro PCS already have approvals for
personal wireless service facilities at the P.G.&E. Monta Vista Substation. The
antennas are collocated on two adjacent transmission towers (two carriers per
tower). The antennas are all mounted on the available legs of the towers below
the lowest insulator arm at heights allowed by the City's wireless
communication facilities ordinance (55 feet and below).
All of these facilities were administratively approved by the Director of
Community Development over the last five years because the facilities have
minimal visibility from public rights-of-way and residential properties (CMC
Section 19.10S.090(B)(1)).
2
~ -:)
EXC-200S-17, DIR-200S-28
Page 3
November 22, 2005
Hei¡¡;ht Exception Tustification. The current applications cannot be approved by
the Director because of the request for an antenna height exception, which
requires a public hearing and Planning Commission approval.
There is no more usable space on the legs of this tower to mount additional panel
antennas. Wireless companies desire a certain separation between its own panel
antennas and those of another company, and P.G.&E. requires a separation of at
least 8 feet between the antenna and the closest high tension wire.
To collocate on the tower, the only available space is on a structural extension to
be mounted 8 feet above the highest wire, which places the antennas at a
maximum height of 94 feet, which is above the 55-foot ordinance maximum. The
structural extension would increase the tower height by approximately 15%,
which is minimal, considering that the visual landscape is dominated by
numerous transmission towers and the substation facilities (photo simulations
Exhibits B & C will be available at the hearing). The structural extension,
antennas, and associated cabling should all be painted the same color as the
tower to help mitigate any increased visibility. Such a condition of approval has
been added to the model resolution.
The increased height has the added benefit of extending wireless coverage to a
larger west Cupertino geographic area that is largely underserved for wireless
communications. The obvious benefit of an expanded coverage area is the
potential avoidance of another monopole proposal in a visually sensitive
neighborhood.
Equipment Shelter, Verizon Wireless typically builds an equipment shelter to
house the ground equipment: telephone, power, back-up systems for its personal
wireless service facility. The proposed one-story, shelter is approximately 11.5' x
20.5'. The shelter requires mechanical ventilation, but there are no neighbors to
be disturbed by the equipment noise. The proposed shelter is located in a
relatively flat area that requires minimal grading and no tree removal.
Alternatives Analysis & Wireless Coverage. The applicant looked at various
sites in West Cupertino (Exhibit D). As the area is predominately residential,
most sites would require a variance or exception, and generate public
controversy. Existing and proposed coverage maps (Exhibits E & F) show
existing Verizon coverage in the Foothill Boulevard/Stevens Canyon Road
corridor from Highway 280 south. With the facility, there is marked increase in
coverage (red, yellow and green areas) on the west side of Foothill Boulevard
from Oak Valley south to almost McClellan Road.
3
0-3
EXC-200S-17, DlR-200S-28
Page 4
November 22, 2005
----------
Radio Frequencv Radiation (RFR) Emissions Assessment. The applicant has
commissioned a study to assess the RFR and compare it to federal safety
standards (Exhibit G). The issue is the cumulative emissions that would be
generated by the two existing and the proposed third personal wireless service
facility at this tower. The study was prepared by Hammett & Edison, Inc. and
signed by a state licensed electrical engineer. The engineer concludes that the
cumulative emissions for the simultaneous operation of all three carrier facilities
would be 2.7% of the maximum public exposure (mpe) limit measured at ground
level. The engineer also calculated the potential exposure if the second floor of a
hypothetical residence was located 360 feet away. The figure was 0.76% of the
mpe. Note that the closest residence is even further away at 580 feet, so the
exposure is even less than 0.76 of the mpe.
As the project and cumulative RFR emissions are well below federal safety
standards, federal law (The Telecommunications Act of 1996) prohibits local
government agencies from regulating personal wireless service facilities on the
basis of RFR emissions.
Height Exception Findings.
A height exception may be granted if the Planning Commission can make all of
the prescribed findings. Staff has listed the findings below and discussed
whether the applicant's exception request meets the finding.
A, That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in
restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title.
Staff believes that this finding can be made as the extra antenna height allows the
company to provide more complete wireless communications coverage in a
known underserved area. One of the purposes of the ordinance is to "facilitate
the development of a wireless communications infrastructure in the City for
commercial, public and emergency uses..."
The height exception also facilitates the collocation of antenna on the
transmission tower, which is a preferred design strategy where visual impacts
are minimal.
B. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition that will be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will
not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare.
Staff believes this finding can be made. The company uses a technology with
power outputs that are well below federal standards for exposure to radio
frequency radiation. Cumulative RFR emissions from all three carriers are also
below federal safety standards. The project will have a minimal visual impact as
4
h~1..f
EXC-200S-17, DIR-200S-28
Page 5
November 22, 2005
the panel antenna will be flush-mounted to a short structural extension of an
existing transmission tower and painted to match the pole. The extension is less
than 15% of the total tower height in a visual landscape dominated by numerous
other transmission towers and the electrical substation.
C. That the exception to be granted will not result in a hazardous condition for
pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
The location of proposed improvements do not interfere with pedestrian or
vehicular travel ways nor do they obstruct lines of sight for these travel ways.
Public Notification. For the purposes of this public hearing, meeting notices
were mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property boundaries
of this P.G.&E. property as depicted in Exhibit H.
Enclosures:
Model Resolutions
Exhibit A: Applicant's Project Description
Exhibit B & C: Photo Simulations (will be available at the hearing)
Exhibit D: Alternatives Analysis
Exhibit E: Existing Verizon coverage map
Exhibit F: Proposed Verizon coverage map
Exhibit G: RFR Assessment for Proposed Verizon Wireless Base Station
prepared by Hammett & Edison, Inc. and dated November 14, 2005.
Exhibit H: Mailing radius for project applications
Plan Set
Colin Jung, Senior Planner ,
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development ':;;ÞA.Æ g, - "'. I' [
-~~('4Z...1
CÙ)"'~
Submitted by:
Approved by:
g:planningl pdrepor'l pcEXCreports/EXC-200S-17.doc
5
(p -5
EXC-2005-17
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, Califomia 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW SIX PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE
MOUNTED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 94 FEET ON AN EXTENSION TO AN
EXISTINGP.G.&E. TRANSMISSION TOWER AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-17
Cal Com Systems, Inc. (for V erizon Wireless)
10 11 0 California Oak Way
SECTION 11: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION
WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations when collocation of personal
wireless service antennas is desirable from a design and visual standpoint, an applicant for
development may file an exception request to seek approval to deviate from the standards; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to the Height Exception
for this application:
1. That the literal enforcement of the provIsIOns of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height above the
ordinance maximum is needed to provide more extensive wireless communications coverage
in a known, underserved area and the height exception facilitates the collocation of antenna
on the transmission tower, which is a preferred design strategy where visual impacts are
minimal.
2. That the proposed project will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the wireless technology
produces radiation below federal exposure standards on an individual and cumulative level.
The equipment will have minimal visual impact as the panel antenna will be flush-mounted
to the tower extension and painted to match the tower and the extension represents less than
15% of the existing tower height.
3. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular
traffic because it is not sited within the travel ways or sight lines of pedestrian or vehicular
traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, application no. EXC-2005-l7 is hereby approved; and
to --(p
Resolution No.
Page 2
EXC-2005-17
November 22, 2005
That the sub conclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2005-17, as set
forth in the Minutes of the Plarming Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005, and are
incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION ill: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "VERlZON WIRELESS, FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN,
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY, CUPERTINO, CA 95014, SANTA CLARA COUNTY",
consisting of eight sheets dated 11111105 and labeled: T-I, T-2, C-I, C-2, Al through A-4,
except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES. DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020( d) (I), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount
of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission ofthe City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chair
Plarming Commission
g:/planning/pdreport/res/EXC-2005-17 res. doc
o ~1
DIR-2005-28
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
MODEL RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW THE ERECTION OF A
PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE F ACILITY THAT INCLUDES SIX PANEL ANTENNAS
MOUNTED TO A STRUCTURAL EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING P.G.&E. TRANSMISSION
TOWER LOCATED AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received a referral of a
Director's Minor Modification, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and Cupertino Wireless Facilities Master Plan
and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for Director's Minor Modification is hereby approved;
and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. DIR-2005-
28 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005,
and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
~,,&
Resolution No.
Page-2
DIR-200S-28
November 22, 2005
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
DIR-2005-28
Cal Com Systems (for Verizon Wireless)
10110 California Oak Way
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "VERIZON WIRELESS, FOOTHILL &
McCLELLAN, 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY, CUPERTINO, CA 95014, SANTA
CLARA COUNTY", consisting of eight sheets dated 11/1lj05 and labeled: T-l, T-2, C-l,
C-2, Al through A-4, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this
resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
3. TOWER EQUIPMENT COLOR
All panel antennas, mounting hardware, tower extension and cabling shall be painted to a
flat gray color to match the existing transmission tower.
4. ABANDONMENT
Aerial facilities not used for their permitted purpose for a period of 18 months is
considered abandoned and must be removed by the property owner or applicant who
bears the entire cost of demolition.
5. EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL
This approval expires five (5) years after the effective date of this exception. The
applicant may renew this permit upon a review of the technology to determine if the
visual impact can be further minimized.
b ~q
Resolution No.
Page-3
DIR-2005-28
November 22, 2005
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of November 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Gilbert Wong, Chair
Cupertino Planning Commission
g:jpdreportjresjDIR-2005-28 res
{p~1O
E'l.ìr\ %\ ï': f1
CAL COM SYSTEMS IINC.,
200 IOmega Road # 20 I, San Ramon, CA 94583
September 23, 2005
City of Cupertino Planning Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Dear Planning Official:
INTRODUCTION
Verizon Wireless is the largest wireless communications provider in the U.S. with more
than 31 million wireless voice and data customers. The coast-to-coast wireless provider
was fonned by the combination of the U.S. wireless businesses of Verizon
Communications and Vodafone, including Bell Atlantic Mobile, AirTouch Cellular, GTE
Wireless and PrimeCo Personal Communications. With demand for wireless service
growing steadily, Verizon Wireless needs to build and expand its wireless network to
meet customers' expectations for reliable, high quality wireless service. Wireless service
also enhances public safety and emergency communications in many Bay Area
communities. Hundreds of E-911 calls are made everyday reporting crimes, medical
emergencies, and car accidents, making roadways and neighborhoods safer. In an effort
to improve coverage in the area around Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevards in
Cupertino, Verizon is seeking to construct a wireless telecommunications facility to
better serve its customer's needs.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
Verizon Wireless is pursuing an unmanned wireless communication facility to be co-
located atop an existing PG&E transmission tower at the Monte Vista Substation facility
in Cupertino.
The proposed facility will consist of six (6) 4'xl' panel antennas, to be mounted to a
proposed twelve foot structural extension to the tower. The proposed ll'x 20' equipment
shelter would be located in space adjacent to the existing tower.
The proposed facility is an unoccupied passive use. After initial construction period of
approximately one-month the site will be visited by Verizon for visual inspection and
maintenance only as needed.
& ~II
Sincerely,
Æ-'~
.~
Jason SmJth '
Cal Com Systems
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Application Form
2. 25 Reduced Size Plan Sets
3. Site Photos / Photo simulations
4. Letter of Authorization
o ~I J.
EI/..\t\þ\\: \)
CAL COM SYSTEMS IINC.,
2001 Omega Road # 201, San Ramon, CA 94583
November 14,2005
Colin Jung
City of Cupertino Planning Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Proposed Verizon Wireless Facility at the Monte Vista PG&E Substation
Dear Mr. Jung:
Pursuant to the application submitted on 9/27/05 for the above-referenced project, the
following is an alternative site analysis and explanation of the specific coverage
objectives of the site. Coverage maps depicting the existing and proposed coverage
levels in the area have been included for your review. The color scheme used on these
maps is as follows: red - in building coverage, highest levels; yellow - in car coverage,
moderate levels; green - on street coverage, low levels. All other colored areas on the
map indicate little or no coverage. Also included for your review is a copy of the RF
compliance form stating that the site will be within the allowable FCC standards for
emiSSIOns.
Alternate Site Analysis/Coverage Objectives
The proposed site is needed to improve the existing low signal levels in the areas around
the intersection of Foothill and Stevens Creek boulevards. The area is currently served
by three existing sites: Hwy 280/Mary to the north, and the Hwy/85 and Deanza College
sites located to the east. There are currently no existing Verizon sites south of the
proposed site at the Monte Vista Substation, which results in poor coverage to the areas
to the south along Foothill Boulevard down to McClellan Rd.
In response to numerous customer complaints in the Rancho Deep Cliff area, Verizon
first investigated the possibility of locating a facility somewhere within the Rancho Deep
Cliff development, and met with a member of the homeowners association to evaluate
possible locations. The first possible site explored was an abandoned 40' self supported
lattice tower previously used for television transmission purposes by the association.
While this existing tower would have worked well for antenna placement, there was no
available space for the equipment shelter, and the proximity of the adjacent residential
uses could have posed a problem with equipment noise. We next looked into the
possibility of locating atop the existing club house building near the teunis courts. The
~-{3
local topography of this area being in a "bowl" prevented this building and most other
parts of the Rancho Deep Cliff area from meeting the coverage objectives of the site, and
would only cover a very small area with the signal levels not even reaching Foothill
Boulevard. It was therefore determined that the only way to effectively cover the
surrounding areas from within Rancho Deep Cliff area would be to construct a tower
approximately 70-80' in height, which would most likely be met with opposition from
surrounding property owners. The adjoining Deep Cliff Golf Course was also
approached by Verizon with a proposal to construct a 70' treepole, bur was not interested
and declined the offer.
Height Exception Justification
The proposed PG&E transmission tower at the Monte Vista substation will meet the
coverage objectives of the site, and serve to be part of active co-location with two other
carriers on the tower. Because there are two other carriers on this tower, Verizon is
seeking a hèight exception to add a proposed 12' extension to the tower for the placement
of their antermas. This additional height would also allow for extended coverage to the
areas south of the site along Foothill Boulevard.
Sincerely,
~S~·th ./ ~
Æ~~ml
Cal Com Systems
925-683-5041
~-Itf
EXISTING COVERAGE MAP - FOOTHILL & MCCLELLAN
~
~
--
cP
~
.'
(T1
to -/5
PROPOSED COVERAGE MAP - FOOTHILL & MCCLELLAN
11\
7Z
:::Ç'
é9
-\
.'
îJ
o -{ (p
f,:'i.HIßiT: G
Verizon Wireless' Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way· Cupertino, California
Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers
The finn of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Verizon
Wireless, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. 161556
"Foothill & McClellan") proposed to be located at 10 II 0 California Oak Way in Cupertino, California,
for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ("RF")
electromagnetic fields.
Prevailing Exposure Standards
The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions
for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93-62, effective October 15, 1997, the
FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report
No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,"
published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions,
with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers ("IEEE") Standard C95.1-1999, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human
Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes nearly identical
exposure limits. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure I. These limits apply
for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons,
regardless of age, gender, size, or health.
The most restrictive limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio fTequency energy for several
personal wireless services are as follows:
pen;onal Wirele.''is Service
Personal Communication ("PCS")
Cellular Telephone
Specialized Mobile Radio
[most restrictive fTequency range]
Approx Frequencv
1,950 MHz
870
855
30--300
Occunational T ,imit
5.00 mW/cm2
2.90
2.85
1.00
Public Limit
1.00 mW/cm2
0.58
0.57
0.20
Power line fTequencies (60 Hz) are well below the applicable range of these standards, and there is
considered to be no compounding effect from simultaneous exposure to power line and radio fTequency
fields.
General Facility Requirements
HE
Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or
"cabinets") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that
send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
VW161556596
Page 1 of 4
b-¡ '7
Verizon Wireless· Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way· Cupertino, California
transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables about
I inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless
services, the antennas require line-of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed
at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the
horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of
such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the
maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas.
Computer Modeling Method
The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology
Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation
methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at
locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that the power level from an energy source
decreases with the square of the distance from it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature
of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests.
Site and Facility Description
Based upon information provided by Verizon, including drawings by AT! Architects and Engineers,
dated September 19, 2005, it is proposed to mount six Andrew directional antennas, three cellular
Model BXA-80063-8CF and three PCS Model BXA-185063-l2CF, on a new 12-foot extension to be
installed above an existing 82-foot PG&E tower (#18/114) located near 10110 California Oak Way in
Cupertino. The antennas would be mounted at an effective height of about 92 feet above ground and
would be oriented in pairs toward looT, 80oT, and 150°T. The maximum effective radiated power in
any direction would be 930 watts, representing simultaneous operation of seven cellular channels at
30 watts each and three PCS channels at 240 watts each.
Presently located on the same tower are similar antennas for Sprint PCS, and Cingular Wireless has
proposed to install antennas for its network there, too. For the limited purposes of this study, it is
assumed that Sprint has installed EMS Model RR90 I 7 directional panel antennas at an effective height
of 28 feet above ground, that Cingular will install Kathrein Model AP 14/17 -880/1950/065D directional
dualband antennas at an effective height of 38 feet above ground, and that the maximum effective
radiated power in any direction is 1,000 watts for Sprint and 2,000 watts for Cingular.
HE
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
VW161556596
Page 2 of4
0-/0
Verizon Wireless· Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way· Cupertino, California
Study Results
For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum ambient RF exposure level due to the proposed
Verizon operation by itself is calculated to be 0.00045 mW/cm2, which is 0.045% of the applicable
public limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level at ground for the simultaneous operation of all
carriers is 2.7% of the public exposure limit; the maximum calculated cumulative level at the second-
floor elevation of any nearby building' is 0.76% of the public exposure limit. It should be noted that
these results include several "worst-case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual
power density levels.
No Recommended Mitigation Measures
Since they are to be mounted on a PG&E tower, the Verizon antennas are not accessible to the general
public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure
guidelines. It is presumed that PG&E already takes adequate precautions to ensure that there is no
unauthorized access to its tower. To prevent exposures in excess of the occupational limit by
authorized PG&E workers, it is expected that they will adhere to appropriate safety protocols
adopted by that company.
Conclusion
Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the base
station proposed by Verizon Wireless at 10 II 0 California Oak Way in Cupertino, California, will
comply with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and,
therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated
level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of
unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken
at other operating base stations.
HE
'" Located at least 360 feet away, based on aerial photos from Terraserver.
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANOSCO
VWl61556596
Page 3 of 4
~ -/((
Verizon Wireless' Proposed Base Station (Site No. 161556 "Foothill & McClellan")
10110 California Oak Way· Cupertino, California
Authorship
The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California
Registration Nos. E-13026 and M-20676, which expire on June 30, 2007. This work has been carried
out by him or under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except,
where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct.
November 14,2005
tt, P.E.
HE
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
VW16l556596
Page 4 of4
(p ~;«()
FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC")
to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have
a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits trom Report No. 86, "Biological
Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the
Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, which are
nearly identical to the more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standard
C95.1-1999, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic
Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz." These limits apply for continuous exposures ftom all sources and are
intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or
health.
As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure
conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive:
F reauency
Applicable
Range
(MHz)
0.3 - 1.34
1.34 - 3.0
3.0 - 30
30 - 300
300- 1,500
1,500 - 100,000
1000
100
~
>oN
~.;,: a 10
~ ¡g-2
o ,,~
"" CI a I
~
Electromagnetic Fields (f is frequencv of emission in MHz)
Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field
Field Strength Field Strength Power Density
(Vim) (Aim) (mW/cm')
614 614 1.63 1.63 100 /00
614 823.8/f 1.63 2. 19/f 100 180/1
18421 [ 823.8/f 4.891 [ 2.19/f 9001t' 180/1
61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2
3.54-Jf 1.5* -Jf1l06 {f/238 f/300 f/1500
137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0
./ Occupational Exposure
/ PCS
0.1
,
, FM
,
,
/'-
Public Exposure
-
____I
,
0.1
10 100 103
Frequency (MHz)
105
104
1
Higher levels are allowed for short periods oftime, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or
thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher
levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not
exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation
fonnulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for
projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those fonnulas into a proprietary program that
calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any
number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven
terrain, if required to obtain more accurate projections.
HE
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
FCC Guidelines
Figure I
0-;2/
RFRCALC TM Calculation Methodology
Assessment by Calculation of Compliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to
adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a
significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC
(see Figure I) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent
margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for
short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for
occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits.
Near Field.
Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip
(omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications cell sites. The near field zone is
defined by the distance, D, from an antenna beyond which the manufacturer's published, far field
antenna patterns will be fully formed; the near field may exist for increasing D until some or all of three
conditions have been met:
2h2
I) D>T
2) D > 5h
3) D > 1.6À
where h = aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and
À = wavelength of the transmitted signal, in meters.
The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives this formula for
calculating power density in the near field zone about an individual RF source:
. 180 0.1 x Pnet
power denstty S ~ tlBW X 1t x D x h' in mW/em2,
where 8BW = half-power beamwidth of antenna, in degrees, and
P net = net power input to the antenna, in watts.
The factor of 0.1 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This fonnula has
been built into a proprietary program that calculates distances to FCC public and occupational limits.
Far Field.
OET-65 gives this fonnula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source:
d . S = 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP . mW/ 2
power enstty 2' III em ,
4 x 1t X D
where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts,
RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and
D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters.
The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a
reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole
relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of
power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location
on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual
radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to
obtain more accurate projections.
HE
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SAN FRANCISCO
Methodology
Figure 2
&-~ bJ.
EXHffiIT: H
Illustration of Public Notice
Mailing Radius for Application Nos.
EXC-2005-17 & DIR-2005-28
h-;¿3
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(40S) 777 -330S
FAX (408) 777-3333
CommunIty Development Department
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
November 28, 2005
Jason Smith
Cal Com Systems
2001 Omega Road #100
San Ramon, Ca. 94583
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - EXC-2005-17
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the
meeting of November 22,2005, approving a height exception to allow six panel
antennas to be mounted at a maximum height of 94 feet on an exception to an
existing P.G. & E. transmission tower, located at 10110 California Oak Way,
according to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6337.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within a two-year period, it shall
expire on November 22, 2007.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar
days from the date of this letter. If this happens, you will be notified of a public
hearing, which will be scheduled before the City Council.
Sincerely,
(I!~i:i)'~
. ( I
Cohn J g 'V
Senior Planner
Cc : P.G. & E., 77 Beale Street, San Francisco, CA 94124
g./planning/post hearing/actionletter exc-2005-17
,··.1" ¡,~' -"~(j ¡",11.'.",'.
EXC-2005-17
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6337
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW SIX PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE
MOUNTED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 94 FEET ON AN EXTENSION TO AN
EXISTING P.G.&E. TRANSMISSION TOWER AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
EXC-2005-17
Cal Com Systems, Inc. (for V erizon Wireless)
10110 California Oak Way
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION
WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations when collocation of personal
wireless service antennas is desirable fi-om a design and visual standpoint, an applicant for
development may file an exception request to seek approval to deviate fi-om the standards; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to the Height Exception
for this application:
I. That the literal enforcement of the provISIons of this title will result in restnctJons
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height above the
ordinance maximum is needed to provide more extensive wireless communications coverage
in a known, underserved area and the height exception facilitates the collocation of antenna
on the transmission tower, which is a preferred design strategy where visual impacts are
minimal.
2. That the proposed project will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be
materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the wireless technology
produces radiation below federal exposure standards on an individual and cumulative level.
The equipment will have minimal visual impact as the panel antenna will be flush-mounted
to the tower extension and painted to match the tower and the extension represents less than
15% of the existing tower height.
3. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular
traffic because it is not sited within the travel ways or sight lines of pedestrian or vehicular
traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, application no. EXC-2005-17 is hereby approved; and
DIR-2005-28
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6336
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW THE ERECTION OF A
PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY THAT INCLUDES SIX PANEL ANTENNAS
MOUNTED TO A STRUCTURAL EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING P.G.&E. TRANSMISSION
TOWER LOCATED AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received a referral of a
Director's Minor Modification, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and Cupertino Wireless Facilities Master Plan
and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application for Director's Minor Modification is hereby approved;
and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. DIR-2005-
28 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 22, 2005,
and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
12;8
.n:;
8~g
..
l~~
,,! ~
0',
~ c.
H";
hH
íðH
j~~~
.",
.,ci:'"
" .
I
I
~
~
,
j
.
"-
f-"'>
.A "
les
wireless
FOOTHILL & McCLELLA
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA 0 K WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95 4
APPROVALS
LEASING: OATE:_
ZONING: DATE:_
RF ENGINŒR: DATE:_
CONSTRUCTION: DATE:_
EQUIP. [HGR: DATE:_
OWNER: DATE:_
SITE NO 161556
APPROVED BY .,
DRAWN BY IN
CHECKED BY .,
AT IS UE
~ 09/06/05 ZO REVIEW
2 09/19/05 10 SUBt.lITIAL
SHEET TITLE
TITLE SI£ET
SHEET NUMBER -
-
T-1
-
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
SAP # : 40752557
SITE NO. 161556
-
CODE COMPLIANCE PROJECT DATA
-
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED TOVÆR OWNER: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLlOWING 77 BEALE STREET, ROOM 2361
CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. SAN FRANCISCO, CA
NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK CONTACT: RICHARD SARTlNI
NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. TEL #: 415-308-9400
CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLE 24 & 25) APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS
1. 2785 MITCHELL DRIVE
2. CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. 2001 WALNUT CREEK, CA. 94598
3. CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2001 CONTACT: JIM GRAHAM
4. CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2001 TEL 1/: 925-279-6333
5. CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE, 2001
6. COUNTY ORDINANCES AGENT : CAL COM SYSTEMS
2001 OMEGA ROAD, SUllE 100
ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: SAN RAMON, CA 94583
FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. CONTACT: KEITH SCHMID
HANDICAPPED ACCESS REOUIREMENTS ARE NOT REQUIRED TEL II: 408-679-1141
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. ARCHITECTURAL!£NGINEER : ATI A&E
3860 BLACKHAWK ROAD
CALIFORNIA COACH NOTE DANVILLE. CA. 94506
CONTACT: MARK SORENSON, P.E.
TEL II: 925-648-8800
THE PROJECT TELECOMMUN!CATION EQUIPMENT SHELTER (VERIZON FAX ,: 925-648-8811
WIRELESS SHELTER) IS DESIGNED UNDER THE JURISD!CTION Of THE -
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - SHEET INDEX
(HCD). THE VERIZON SHELTER IS DESIGNED UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS T1 TITLE SHEET
(STANDARDS) FOR COMMERCIAL COACHES (DESCRIBED IN INFORMATION
BULLETIN HH93-10). THE HCD PRESENTLY UTILIZES THE 1991 AND 1994 T2 LEGEND, ABBRE\I1ATlONS, GENERAL NOTES & DETAILS
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS THEIR GOVERNING REGULATIONS FOR C1 SITE SURVEY (PAGE 1 OF 2)
COMMERCIAL COACHES.
C2 SITE SURVEY (PAGE 2 OF 2)
BUILDING/SITE DATA LEGEND A' SITE PLAN
A2 SHELTER PLAN & ANTENNA PLAN
OCCUPANCY: GROUP U A3 NORTHEAST ELEVATION
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION N.R. M NORTHWEST ELEVATION
&. McCLE&LAN
S;gnatt:rc
MAGNESIUM
SEP 2 7 2005
p~/.
--)[ .
~-- - f
---=.::
[J..c..-),oo
M'P!WVAL DIK-.;¡o.ot
"'. 'PM"''-
? ;'::~ r....~:;;':i!;!.:·.:-
14
18/
.
TOWER # :
LINE NAME
WAY
10110 CALIFORNIA
CUPERTINO 95014
SANTA CLA OUNTY
OAK
VICINITY MAP
fRW~. 280
~~
0
S
I
~
i"
< CUPERTINO
"
AVE.
CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN
OAK WAY STEVENS CREEK
@
SITE DIRECTION
FROM VERIZON WIRELESS (WALNUT CREEK):
GO SOUTHWEST ON MITCHELL DR TOWARD N WlGET LN. TURN LEFT ONTO
N WlGET LN. TURN RIGHT ONTO YGNACIO VALLEY RD. MERGE ONTO
1-6BO S TOWARD SAN JOSE. TAKE THE MISSION BLVD WEST EXIT
TOWARD I-BBO/WARM SPRINGS DISTRICT/UC EXTENSION. MERGE ONTO
MISSION BLVD/CA-262 W. MERGE ONTO 1-880 S TOWARD SAN JOSE.
MERGE ONTO CA-237 W TOWARD MTN VIEW. MERGE ONTO CA-B5 S
TOWARD CA-82 SILOS GATOS/SANTA CRUZ. TAKE THE STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD EXIT. TURN RIGHT ONTO STEVENS CREEK BLVD. TURN RIGHT
ONTO CALIFORNIA OAK WAY. END AT 10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5655, US
8'
OAKLAND
SITE
JOSE
MAP
LOCATION
342-63-001
161556
4'_OØ IlERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS
3 SECTORS - 2 ANTENNAS PER SECTOR
SECTOR 90 FT.
SECTOR 90 FT.
SECTOR 90 FT.
2
3
A.P.N. :
SITE NUMBER
ZONING
ANTENNA TYPE
COAX LENGTH
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A TOTAL OF (6) 4'-0" VERIZON PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED
ON THE EXISTING PG&E LA TTTlCE TOWER. VER!ZON WIRELESS
EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO BE INSTALLED IN A 20'-0~ x 30'-0" LEASE
AREA. (2) GPS ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED TO SHELTER.
@
~
>
·
·
õ
"
o
·
o
,
·
¡
5
~
Š
·
~
~
!
i,
~
]
'i
0,
·
õ
~
~
~
¡
i
~
¡
0,
õ
0,
~
o
·
~
~
0:
~I .
,
!
S
i
~I 8
c
J~ ~ III "00
¡lUlI
"1'
!Ö .:.
-
-
~
Ve"70nwire/es.s
-~~
17M MI1aIW. DIIM
w.<t..HUTCfIŒI\,CI_8
FOOTHILL 6. McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161558
10110 CALFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVAlS
lfASING: DATE_
ZONING: DAT[,_
Rf ENGINEER: DATE:_
CONSTRUCTION: DATE_
EQUIP. ENGR: DATE:_
OWNER: DATE:_
SITE NO 161556
APPROVED BY .5
DRAWN BY IN
CHECKED BY .5
GROUT OR PLAST(R
(E) BRICK
(E)uASO"RY
CONCRETE
EA-RTH
GRAVEL
" rM)OO
,~,
WOOD emIT
WOOD BlOCl<lNG
STEEL
CENTERLINE
PRoPERTY/LEASE
LINE
GROUND CONDUCTOR
TELEPHC»>IE CONDUIT
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
CO¡O,XIALCABLE
I,4ECHANIC"l
O\IERH[ADSER'YICE
CONDUCTORS
CHAIN LINK fENCING
PRIIAARYVOLTACE
£lECTRICAlCONOUIT
JOIN1TRENCH
(ELECTRIC/TELCO)
T1
n· ','" ~.-' .~. .~
Un .,.."
I I
Þ:'.T~,'~· ~IT:S'T.::;:1
I.~~';-,~,:"I
"
I- j
~
cs;:¡
"
LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS,
AND GENERAL NOTES
CA0242
T-2
JOB NO.
NUMBER
TITLE
COMPANY
SHEET
SHEET
4
(N) YER1ZON
WIRELESS
NtTENNA. TYP.
21/Z"HæIZONTAl
PIPEBRÞ.CKETS
ATTACHTD
TOYo£Rl.£G
21/Z"~TE:NNA
MOUNTING PIPE_
6'LONG
-,-
-E-
-^-
-.-
-T/E-
-^-
-,-
-E/T-
3'-0-
ço NEW ANTENNA
Ÿ EXISTING ANTENNA
<8> GRQUNQROQ
~ GROUND BUS BAR
. ...ECH....NICA.LGRND
CONNECTI~
. CA.DWELD
0 CHRISTY BOX
EJ ELECTRIC BOX
>:f LIGHT POLE
0 fND.t.lONUt.lENT
~ SPOT ELEVATION
l::. SET POINT
&, REVISION
0 GRID REFERENCE
@ DETA.llREFER£NCE
~ ELEVATION REHRENCI
0 . SECTIONREfERENeE
0 ...A.TCHLINE
~ WORK POINT
2 LEGEND
L
~
<
ê
~
b
,
'<
C
5 ANTENNA DETAIL
r,o.c.
r.O.ht
r.o.s.
LO.W
F.S.
n,n
'"
".
'^.
.
"0
C(.8.(GlU~LAM)
""
OR'"
"OR.
"OR.
"'.
,,,,,
1tII.{")
.,.
LB·(I)
c'.
cr.
c
MA.S.
.^'
M.B.
MECH.
."
M1N.
MISC.
."-
~tg.(,)
N.T.S.
O.C.
OPNG.
'I'
m
PLY.
""
,eo
'"
P.S.F.
1'.5.1.
P.T.
''''.
''''
RAD.(R)
"".
RE1NF.
REO'D.
''"
"'.
S.LD.
,"T.
...
'"
ANCHQRBOlT
ABOVE
~TtNNA.CABLE
COYER I\SSEMeLT
AOOITlONA.L
ABOVE fiNISHED flOOR
ABOVE fiNISHED GRA.DE
A.BOV( GROUND LEVEL
A.LU...INUM
A.LTtRNATE:
A.NTtNNA
APPROXIMATE{LY¡
ARCHITECT(URAl
AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE
BARE COPPER WIRE
""-
..""
BLOCKING
"".
BOUNDARY NAlUNG
BOTTDhI C£ roomlG
BACK-uP CA!IIN[T
CABINET
CANTll£VER(ED)
CAST IN PLACE
œ...,
OU^'
COlUMN
",""m
CüNNECTlON(OR)
CONSTRUCTION
CONTINUOUS
PENNY (NAILS)
DOUBLE
DEPARTMENT
DOUGlAS fiR
DIAMETER
DIAGONAL
DIMENSION
DRAWlNG(S)
DO'lo£L(S)
"'"
ELEVATION
ELECTRICAL
ELEVATOR
EL£CTRlCAL METAU.IC TUBING
EDGE NAIL
ENGINEER
E"'^>.
EXPANSION
EXISTING
EXTERIOR
FAIIRICATION(OR)
fiNISH FLOOR
flNISHGIIADE
flNlSH(ED}
n.oœ
FOUNDAT1ot<1
SPEOflCAT1ON(S)
SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL
SEESTRUCTURAlORA'MNGS
ST~DARD
STtEL
STRUCTURAL
TO BE DETERMINED
TE , pORARY
THICK(NESS)
TOE N....L
TOP OF ANTENNA
TOP OF CURB
TOP OF PLATE (pAR,o,p[T)
TOP Of STEEL
TOP or WAll.
n'>"""
UNDERGROUND
UNDER~ITERSLA8ORATORY
UNl£SS NOTED OTHER¥IISE
VffiIFYINFlELO
WlDE(WlDTH)
.TH
""'"
WEATHERPROOF
'EIGHT
TRANSfORMER
CENTERUNE
PC"E
AZIMUTH
SPEC.
"
S.S.
S,S.D
m.
m.
STRUC
T,B.D.
TEMP.
TH'
T.N.
T.O.A.
T.O.C.
T.O.p
T.O.S.
T.O.W.
n'>'.
"'
,.c
U.N.O.
V.1.F.
W
:.í
W.'
WT.
",..
.
.
"
FACE OF CONCRETE
FAct: Of MASONRY
FACE Of STUD
fACE OF WAlL
f1NISHSURfACE
FOOT(fEET)
fOOTING
GROWTH (CABINET)
GAUG(
GM.VANI2E{O)
GROUND rAlA.TCRC\1ITIHTERRUPITR
Q..UE LAMU<lATEtI BE:f< ,
GlOB'-lPOSlTlONlNGSYSTe: ,
GROUNO
"""'"
HANGER
HEIGHT
Iscu..TtDW'PERGROONtIBUS
INCH{ES)
INTERIOR
POUNO{S)
LAGBOLT5
LINEAR FŒT (fOOT)
LONC(ITUDlNAl)
"'ASONRY
"'AXlMU ,
...ACHINEBOlT
"'ECH~CAL
"'ANUfACTURER
t.lINIMUU
t.lISCELl.ANEOUS
hIETAL
"'W
NOT TO SCALE
ON CENTER
Of>Ot!NG
PRECAST CONCRETE
P£Rscw.L COMINltAlKII SEJMCES
" rM)OO
POINT OF CONNECTION
POWER PROTECTION CABINET
PRI...ARY RADIO CABINET
POUNDS PER SOUARE FOOT
POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
PRESSURE TREATED
POWER (CABINET)
OUANT1TY
RADIUS
REf(R(NŒ
RfJtIfORC£MENT{I+IG)
REQUIRED
RIGID GALVANIZED STŒL
SCHEDULE
SŒELECTRICALORAI'IINGS
'"Err
ow","
SER",ce: PANEL
1-1/4", PIPE
CA8I.£ TO PIPE CONNECTOR
BURNOY TYPE GAR
CONT1NIlOUS BEAD or
SlUCONE SEAl~i
o TOP OF" UNISTRUT (TYP.)
CONDUIT CLAMP
NEOPRENE WASHEJI
o ATTAOiWENT (TYP.)
12-t.nN.I.ENCTH
UH!STRUTP~(TYP,)
(E) MECHANICAl ECVlPMENT SCREEN
16 A'/IIG GROUNo.NG KIT CABLE
1/2-' COAXIAl CABt.£
COPPER ISOlATED GROUND eus
ABBREVIATIONS
'2 AWG BTeW
(TYP.3PlACEs
2 PER UNI$TRUT,
MIN.. TYP.
1/4" . ~ J. LONG ,',',
LAG BOlT, TYP, t:,
~~~~
..
".
".
..
',"
GPS ANTENNA DETAIL
U
ABV.
AceA
A"n
A.F.r
A.LG.
A.G.L
ALUM
ALT.
ANT.
APpRJt
^''"
AWO.
BeW
'U>O.
''''.
BLKG.
"'.
B.N.
B.D.f.
'IV
CAB.
CANT.
C.I,P.
"',.
OCR.
,"-
CONC.
CONN.
CONST.
CONT.
,
OBC
DEPT.
c.r.
DIA.
OIAG,
,~
'WO.
,..
'^.
EL
ELEC.
illV.
[IoIT.
E.N.
ENG.
EO.
E"'.
EXST,(E
EXT,
'''''.
f.f.
LG.
F»<.
""
FD'.
'bILlT'!".
PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCAlED. THESE PLANS ARE INTENOCD TO BE A
DIAGRAWMATIC OUTlINE ONLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE WORK SHAll
INClUDE fURNISHING Io4ATERIAlS, EQUIPMENT AND APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR
NECESSARY TO [FFECT AlL INSTAllATIONS AS INDlCATEO ON THE DRAWINGS.
INSTALl. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATrRIAL5 IN ACCORDANC£ WITH IoIANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATIONS UNI£SS SPEClF1CALLY OTHERWISE INDICATED DR WHERE LOCAL
CooES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE.
NOTED
ALl WORK PERFCRMED AND IroiATERIALS INSTALLED SHALl BE IN STRICT
ACCOROANCE, AS A MINIIroiUM STAND,&.RD, WITH AlL APPLICABLE CooES,
REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES HA'IING ..uRISOICTION. COHTRACTOR SHALL CI'Æ
AlL NOTICES AND CQMPL Y WlTJ-i All. LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS
AND LAWFUL ORDERS or ANY PUBUC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE PERFOfUoIANCE
Of THE WORK. EI£CTRICAL SYSTEIoIS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WlTJ-i
ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL CODES, NATIONAl ELECTRIC CODE, AND UTlUT'I'
COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE ..uRISOICTlON,&.L CODES,
ORDINANCES AND APPUCABI£ REGULATIONS.
IS AN UNOCCUPIED MOBILE RAI
CONTRACTOR SHAlL NOTlrY PROJECT MANAGER OF AU. PRODUcTS OR ITtMS
AS -EXISTlNG- 'MilCH ARE NOT FOUND TO BE IN THE FIELD.
THE FACIUT'I'
,
5
USTEO AND fiRE
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCQROANΠWITH CHAPTER 16 OF THE UNIFORM
BUILDING CODE REGARDING EARTHOUAKE PRO'llSlONS FOR PIPING, WCHT
FIXTURES, CEILING GRID, INTERIOR PARTITIONS AND IroiECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.
AlL WORK IoIUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAl EARTHQUAKE CODES AND
REGULATIONS.
FIRE RATED AREAS WITH U.L
SEAL PENETRAT10NS THROUGH
CODE APPRO\£D MATERIALS.
,
7.
3
NOTE·
ALL POWER AND TEl.£PHONE UTILITIES REQUIRED FOR SITE SERVICE ARE lOCATED
WITHIN THE EXISTING PARCELS.
_",_;;¡';¡":6QDS
I,.~'
'7
pri!WÓ.g Cc.nwJ)'j¡;
GENERAL NOTES
AI'I'ROV A\.
o
·
l
"
c
8
ö
c
·
c
,¡
¡
·
~
.-
~
~
~
~
!
~
~,
8
I
]
~,
·
õ
~
¡¡
<
~
¡
~
,
¡
~
;j
~
C
<
~
~
;:
Phil Auer
Survevin,
B..lk":~leT;y~\:A ~bo;314
J'~Wfe~: (f:l&) IW1~:6.J=4
E-mail: Is5075é..orthlink.ne
EDGE OF PAVEUENT
-E E-
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNE
-X-X-X-
tENCE LINE
------.--.-----
PROPERTY UNE
.ABOVE WEAH SEA LE'ÆL
.ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
.FJELD CONTROL POINT
"'st..
AGI....
o CP 'n
'ö FIRE HYDRANT
SPOT
ElEVATION
HANDICAPPE
PARKING
eTP l'EW'HON£
'OLE
I.IONUIoIENT
,
a_Ius'
<!>
6-
t.lANHOLE
WCHT POLE
."
TREE
"'"'
"li
'0""
'OLE
LEGEND
œ
P-
o
...
if
\..---:" ,
verlZJl!1 WI reless
~~
---
"""'~-
08/22/05
GRAPHIC SCALE 1-"'00'
~
TOO '00 300
BK 342, PG 62 ISURVEYED BY/ OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:
1
/
/
/ /
1 /
/ /
/ ó' 0""1
/ p 0/
. l ~'f / /
..,yt ,,"1/
.... ~
'f / ..
'.//' '"
^Q"~l pe/
.;(/ # "1/
1 ../
$"; 1(/
,ø~1 ".-:1
¿/ /
/ /
/
/
/
FOOTHILL &
161556
10110 CAliFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO. CA 95D14
SANTA CLARA COUN1Y
McCLELLAN
OI"""rPhJIpA,
LS. 5075
[.plres 06/30/07
WOTts:
TlTL£ REPORT WAS AVAIlABLE AT 'TIWE Of' FJELD SURVEY, THIS IS
NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THIS IS A SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAP "'TH
PROPERTY UNES AND [ASEWENTS BEIWC A GRAPHIC DEPICTION or VARIOUS
INFORMATION GATHERED rROM PREUMINARY TIllE REPDRTS OR PROPERTY HISTORY
REPORTS. BACK-UP DOCUMENTS or RECORD, MAPS AND AVAIlABLE MOWUMENTS
FDUND DURING 1HE FIELD SURVEY. NO PROPERTY MONUIIIENTS WERE SO.
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE COMPANY
~~-~~t~ b:~~ ~l~TI~~PE~~~t~P~~DÞR~1:~~~1;T~~~M~ BE
THIS MAP.
l\
/' ..
, \
./. \~
/ 'ij:~"
/ o¡;,~~ _
/ \ /\
/' \ -V" \
.,3,-' \
' ""'d',
/ .....·i'¿e, ;JJ,í' \
' ,"'..., ,
/ ""..'¡¡;¡. /' \
/ ~ \
' "-
\>1',..
~~
~~~
\
,;'>
~
\~
~
\
~\\
MOST EASTERLY'
COO,"'"
(376R.S..7)
DATE or SURVEY,
°
/
/
/1
A.F'.N
A.P.N, BK. 342, PG 60
.. --:~.
.~....
1/'jd'
~':-·¡'.:~.V Al. -
" .,...._.;.... .
'" //
,...,H;; ä~'¡?;!SS¡¡¡¡~-:;¡,;}-::JDD5
,,~"; ( ,,,"
Si&na1UfCcb
Casc"'.'
r'
!-'
(
\
i
SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
IN THE StATE or CAUFORNIA. COUNTY OF SANTA ClARA. BEING THE LANOS
DELINEATED IN THAT CERTAIN RECORD OF SUR'YEY ENTlllED "RECORD OF SURVEY
Of" A PARCEL Of" LAND IN RANCHO SAN ANTONIO (MESAl, BEING IN THE N.W. 1/.
OF SEC. 15. N.E. 1/. Of" SEC. 16, T. 7 S.. R.2 w.III.D.fI.. M.·, PER RECORD OF
SURVEY THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 1S. 1976, IN BOOK 376 or RECORD OF
SURVEYS AT PAGE 47, SANTA ClARA COJNTY RECORos.
\
.
\
\
.
\
,
\
i\~
,,\'(1.
~1~-
~.
\
.
\
\
,
.i
~,
'ò'
~\
:t\
.\
".
\
,
) .
/ / .
, / I'
I /
J '" '
M - '
.'" $ ,
$ r /
. / /
/ .. /
.- / / /
--- ' / '
- I / /
~, .~ /' /
.;It;?'. I""~""'W ,_",,1';;0) .,,/~ /
<"2"'-- -L- 55.50' L-""'·./ /
\:-- ........ <.
--- ---- -
---------------
S45il~~"W PRoPtR'N lINE
LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION (PARCEl. Ar.
COMMENCING AT 'THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE SAID LANDS (376
:i~C:·~EN~N~W~'~~'1f~s~~~'þ~~/E,UEJ& ~gR~~\·Z'l,~~_ŠT
30.00 f'ŒT: THENCE NORTH 44'6'19" EAST 20.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 45'43'41"
EAST 3D.00 FEET TO 'THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
342-63-001
(37& R.5. 47)
A.P.N
DATE=-
DATE=---
DATE=----
DATE=-
DATE=-
DATE:
61556
OP.
ISSUED F'OR
REV. 13
NOT TO SCALE I
._+ c=
; CUPERTINO
SHEET NUMBER
.~ C-1
STE'ÆNS CR{EK SHEET 1 OF 2
=
ICOMPANY JOB NO. CA0242!
DP'
TCN
ISSUED F'OR
90:1:: REV.
ISSUED F'OR
REV. 11
ISSUED F'OR
REV. 12
APPROVALS
ð
,&,
.& 09/06/05
& 09/06/05
08/23/05
09/02/05
APPROVED BY
BY
ID.SING:
ZONING:
Rr ENGINEER:
CONSTRUCTION:
EQUIP. ENGR:
OWNER:
BY
CHECKED
SITE NO
DRAWN
.,
NET AREA OF:
UNDERLYING PARCEL(S): ~ LEASE AREA:6~.
FlOOO PlAIN ELEVATION OF LEASE AREA IN ZONE O. AN AREA OF UNDETERMINED.
r~lE~~3.fà=,H~¡~81.u.g,ss.r~~9~ FEMA FIRM MAP COMMUNITY-PANELI
FAA 1A ŒRTIflCATlON:
LATlTVO( AND LONGlTlJOE WAS OBTAINEO rROM INFORMATION PRD'v1OED SY A GPS
SIJR'ÆY. THE G£OOETlC POSITION SHOWN WAS OETERMINED UTlUZING FAST-STATIC
GPS OBSERVATIONS FROM USGS MONUMENTS USING TRIMBLE 4600lS
RECEI'ÆRS. THE DATA WAS DlFTERENTlAUY CORRECTED 'MTH TRIMBLE GPS
SIJR'ÆY SOFTWARE.
CAUF()Rt. IA
OAK WAY
GENERAllY
EA5EIIIENTS
"'L
(NAD 83)
LATItuDE AND LONGITUDE DEMOTED ON TI-IS PlAN ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN
15:1: FEET HDRIZONTAllY AND THE ELEVATIONS SHO'" ON THIS PLAN ARE
ACCURATE TO WI'THIN M f'ŒT 'ÆRTlCAUY.
POINT:
29 D....TUM.
281 III. 10, SANT.... ClARA COUNTY RECORDS.
SHOWN ON SHE£'T 2 OF 2.
PACIFIC GAS a:. ElECTRIC COIoIf'ANY
77 ElEAlE ST.
SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94106
.....P.N. 342-63-001 (PORTION)
CONTAINING 600 SOIJARE FEET MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH A PROPOSED 12 FOOT 'WID( ACCESS EASE:IttENT AS
SHO'MII HEREON.
TOGETHER WITH PROPOSED 5 FOOT WIDE AND 6 FOOT WIDE UTILITY
GENERAlI. Y SHOWN HEREON.
BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: NGVD
BASIS OF BEARINGS'
425.2' AloISI..
TOWER!EL_507.2' AIoISl/HT_SZ.D'
LATlTUO£: 37'19'30.03"
27) LONGITUDE: 122'04'30.38"
ElEVATION OF GROUND AT CPS
STRUCTURE HEIGHT: TOP OF (E)
LATITUDE: 37'9'30.24"
LONGITUDE: 122"04'26.5Z" (NAD
PROJECT BENCH: AS
O'M\IER'S INFORIIIATlON:
VICINITY MAP
TRACT 6!1!11
(PER 449 M. 24
i
·
!
i
!
i
:
I
,
!
i
,
~ ,-----
,T,
i ~ i
.3.
i:>< i
· <t .
i 0 .
· !
· :J: .
I VJ I
: :J :
I ø I
· z .
'"" .
I I
, ) ,
· ,
om ______-'. j
~.,'- ._-_.~- _._------~/.
f~oRi"",, -=1-________,
'1l.y;=---¡;¡¡JESTlC OAK WY.
f r~i'
I , IPP
! I :
í'
~
1"_100'
"
eo.
TRAC14824
(PER 281 M. 1D)
342-12-030
BK. 342
f~
f?
A.P.N.
SEE
P.O.C. DETAIL
(SHEET 2 OF
SEE
P.O.C. DETAIL
(SHEET 2 OF
CENTERUNE
OF PROPOSED
12' WIDE \£RIZON
WlREL£SS ACCESS
1St 5' WIDE UlIUTY
EASEMENTS
,",P.N.
"
CALIFORNIA
OAK WAY
,.
3<,
".
.....P.N.
2)
SEE
SITE MAP
(SHEET 2 OF
342-63-002
OVERALL SITE MAP
A.P.N
DATE=-
DATE=-
DATE~
DATE:_
DATE,---
OAT£:
Phn Auer
Surveying
B..l":~eÍ:,rt~ Lelr;314
:~:~e~: (f:l¿1 5:1~:~4
E-mail: 1s507S.eart.hlIDk.ne
~ ,
VerlZQl1wlreless
-~
-""""--
wourCllUK,OI._
APPROVAlS
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO. CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
61556
OPA
TCN
OPA
ISSUED toR
90% REV.
ISSUED FOR
REV. 11
ISSUED FOR
REV. 12
ISSUED FOR
REV. 13
lEASING:
ZONING:
RFENGlNrER:
CONSTR\IC11ON
EOUIP. ENGR:
OWNER:
SITE NO
APPROVED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
ß 08/23/05
.&. 09/02/05:
& 09/06/05:
ð 09/06/05!
\';
,,\'\ ;
", \\ ~
\ \ \. 1
,\,\,\'\\
~~
\ \ ' \ \
' '\\
".~. í \, "
5"'&)' ". ~..i I¡f.'q)':. \'\ \ \ '\
3 ;ß;'. ',. .. 'n",. II \ , '.
- ~". ",-, ....
:J ;>:ß.,..ti 0=-<'.'" /.~~¡ry,. \\> " \"
\ 'of _~ ".' ~ '"\"
\~' , :.,;~ ,,' \ ,\
\ . .'~.", ITERÙNE \ \
' .' "r. _,
\ A~~ I .MY-, < \,U\ '.
\ --~ . " >"', -, ,
:; /. .·R~~M¡:'~U~,{~,!gJ"}j//r~~";f,,-,, 'X', ! \1 \
./" E, "~I r·... X ..../ ,
. ! / ! f· (, , " .... ' /"
./ ' ./ .0. ;11 ..'-.. .....~ ~' 0
' '''D_ . A. < ">'¡"". ,
GR~~S~J~~~ / CE~~ / \\ \Æ.' \./' ~~~ /~ (
"","TOGO ¡OF IlER1ZON ~~-N "'''', '" .
. , , ,= / '. -'- '... '. "
.. ~~, "., . '<" -'""" >..'0'.. f ''1M",
0' /1 ~!EA5EM ('·m!i.o ¡ \ \1.\: /~~....'Y ;,z -"-.. '''--. ~,\ / ';:VElEV'j1)< l)
"" ! '""", , ':, . :.. /...' 'v"~. ~.,.... ~ þ ~ . . ". !
¡ ?-'vc:~I¡<:; '., +.-...~! ':r~>~ i ';<: '<", / '- ~ ,/ ":~' _. !l1Ilff111r¡(!1ì ) .
~/" \.------ ~~' -':i>'\.. i ~~~, / ,0,-1 / ~ / \.. :\\ ~,"",S ,.
/ ~ "'~.,'" '" '~.." ( " ,,,':
/' / '",.~ .... , , '.. ":, , \ -'
/' \ ,/ CENTERUQSENEO ~~''v. "",.. .. ¡ , . . I, \\ \ \ '\ /
" ~ - ~<,. '" . . , ". .
,/ ..~ \/ '!::f¡, - ..~~~, i 4' / ¡ ! \ \\\\\ " /
/' ". . ~ ,""" . , "....:.. ,"'" I , I \. \. \ \ \\
.', / " .., "'. . '- . . "",
-,' / .. '" "". i j. ¡ E'~"'.'· ~ í j ; 6 ~ ~ ;, '"
. \ ""/ . ... , "'. ". , . . : , ,
" .-"'. " .. ...."" '" i! -+-.., "! i ii' ,
V· ""'" ~<1í"", "-ì i i ! i /'//////..-
,<, ~ '''-''" ~'-! I, ~ t / -' .. /
,. '''''''%/, I, !//.
/ " ' "'" ,,! ! i /, ... .
""',,",,- ">, ~~ / ,/ / .
,,"-> ~~ I /
'". " ":::: <~'I.
'-, " '"-,, "",
"'-..." '"-,, "
'\.x" '..." ~
J". "'-, "
,b\!,~','ó¡, "~""""-" ''''-
... ',,;.. .......
" ~'0.. "'~
mUNE '-.'0,;<>-"", ""
OF~ROPOSEDON --::>"~ "-
VERIZ ....... '
~~5Ç~\AJ'~~ " "~,~,, '"
& EAS<MENlS ........ ... '"-,, "
'- " '"" "-
" " '"" "
~ '"" "-
".,,~ .
. " _..-0. ___..
" ' "", " """, / ~- -- "
' ,...., -- -" "-...,,,
" ...', ~ ...:::---------=. -- --' ~'...
' , ',,, - - - - "/ " .....,
...... ".. - - . ,<."
' '-..... - ~oÕ'õ':';;"!8' L~~-::- __~..-- _ " " ~.:&~.
.., ~ -- ~.~.- - -- " """
'':0 '- ......", - -_"" __ , 23.00' ,
" ....... - - - / ";0"',,'3.1"
"-~- / L-".
' ,/
,
"-,.
NOT TO SCALE
""
EL_492.4' AloiSI..
HT_67.2'AGt
""
El_501.6' At.ASL
HT_76.4' AGl
"'..
"L
< PT OF TOWER
EL..477.2· AUSl
lofT_S2.0' AGL
""
El_4fI2.:r
HT-57."
'CPO<'
TO'll£R
El_507.2' AMSl
I-IT_82.0' ~GL
TOWER ELEVATION
{El~~Wl:A
El_453.2' At.4Sl
HT-28.0· AGl
4.6'HIGH
,,'
30
~
'-.'0'
'"0
20
jJ
50,,-,
GRAPHIC
TO
,.
"
INTERVAL
E~~~'~'W~
HT"2.9~
..'
PRO.ÆCT BENCH
.X" ON TOP or FOOllNG
EL_420.2' AtoISL
CONTOUR
/
OF" w~U./ CP 6
.2' AWSl
,~s-:.
~~~~~~V,1·
PAoNEI,//
~/fup OF" W"ll
/EL_41B.6' ~t.4Sl
6.1' ~Gl 1'\-
<~r((
"'!'r-
VERIZON WIRELESS
NON-EXClUSIVE 9' X 14'
EASEt.'IEN1 FOR US£: OF
TEI.IPORARY EI.IERGENCY
GENERA10R PARKING
/
/,/
<
.'
,
MAP
PROPOSED
20'X30' VERI20N
WIRELESS
LEASE AREA
(P~RCEL ~)
SITE
~
0'1 At.
¡..mlss/m
ELECl1 CAL1~
VAUlT ~
"
L
Signature
,
"',." An'
"'00 .
~"'''''
),amling
SHEET TITLE
SURVEY
SHEET NUMBER
C-2
SHEET 2 OF 2
=
COMPANY JOB NO. CA02421
UNKNOWN
VAULT
HYORAoNT
EDGE or PA\ÐŒNT
-E E-
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UN[
-x-x-x-
F'ENCE UNE
TElEPHONE -------------
POLE PROPERTY L.JIIE
SPOT AI.ISL ......ABOVE WEAN SEA LE\Æi.
ELEV~TlON
AGL .........ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
o CP ,. ....nELÐ CONTROL POINT
HAoNOICAPPEI
PARKING
"'ONUMENT
t:5 FlRI
.'"
+
a"'24.S·
<!)
e..
~
~ LIGHT POLE
I.IANHOlE
"m
",.T
POLE
P,,",'
POLE
LEGEND
o
.'"
.pp
3
I
i
j
I
j
I'::'\~
er~
CENTERUNE
or PROPOSED I
'2' "DE IlERIZON I .,
WlR LESS ACCESS
&: 5~ WIDE UllUTY I .
EASEMENlS 1.1
I I~¡
I I ¡
I I ¡·.I
·::¡·~~I
'.
Tll21
,p
I !~I
III
I ¡ I I
=,_.1-.1
~
o
-"
c.
..
bg
N.
~
.
.
342-63-001
(376R.5.47)
CENTERUNE
or PROPOSED
S' WIDE 'ÆRIZON
WIRELESS UllUTY
EASEMENT
¡¡:. .,,:>s.,,:.
~L...- 28.23'
A.P.N
I~~
I~~
. ~
I~
I :
OET,.L #2
I
i
,-
P.O.C,
'"
2
i
i
~
".'0'
o
I~i
II
II
I'~
~
,N
!~I
I~I
,~
I
I
I I
CENTERUHE
OF PROPOSED
12' WIDE 'ÆRIZON
WIRELESS ACCESS
&: 5' WIDE UnUTY
EASEMENTS
COHCRETE
P"
.
"
PP Wµ'~NEL
CENTERUNE
or PROPOSED
5' WIDE VERIZON
WIRELESS UllUTY
EASEMENT
P.O.C.
#
DET,.L
APPROVALS
DATE_
DATE_
_DATE:_
DATE_
DATE_
DATE,
WAY
HF
II;:~~
'<I(:¡¡
!~~õñ
Æ:S!~
i~Ii
· .
SHEET TITLE
SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
A-1
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
NO
¡G109/06/05 ZD REVIEW
.3S. 09/19/05 ZD SUB'-4ITTAL
Y:"" .
Vefl70nWtre/es
~~~
1~1IITCtÐJ.._
"'~CllŒK.c.o._
li~
~:~
.8u.::.
:f~
~.;-
8~]
· .
·
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
61556
.5
.5
IN
l
I
I
I
~
~
SITE NO
APPROVED BY
DRAWN BY
CONSTRUCTION:
EQUIP. ENGR:
OWNER:
LEASING:
ZONING:
RF ENGINEER:
J~
f'//
,ç.,
#<8c/
, .
&/'
/'
/
\~
'.
\ ~
'1
\ ~
.0
ì
\
\
\ .
' ~ 00
" ~~ ,!i:~
. 0
',,~ .'~
-, ,. o.
:: \ "'10 :::8
' ',~O ..
r" "5 ~
~-, , \ --~,
m -:" - - - - - ,; --- --;,~-:2ò,,,-, ¡",,~-¡,-, '-" ;~;; g;,g ;~'¡Z",;
~ (E)unurrv"u ~ ~' /______,__=== '________.=:_=_-=--___ ~ __~',.;:_'''',
' ' , /;:..::..--=::=---""\~-~-- "-""'~,,".
----------~fT/. .- ~ l ...,,',~.....,'
------- , ¡"'"', """
' , ,-~ " " "'" ';, '",,,,
~ "<'~, '"" , '" ",,,,,,,,,
' ',,, - -- .Þ 'd" '\, '" "
~-:-.::"-::.-~--~-~""" ~m"- m_ " /'I \ ", m"~""" ,'-
,,,,, 'C "'Þ,-,-' " _. __ --'f " \ _, """" "
'-,- I, , ~-__-_ , '""",
,'..-:-> ~ -:--------=-~ - 'I .~-"!' \, __-:--:::_?_.:/ \." ., ..#...¡. "~~~~","\\
/é-:c-_.- -;;-,,-,,:c_--¡f ! '" ,I I . ----'Bf~'C,~C>. "'---, '¿""",,',,
-- ~ ¡.,: - -, I' i ", " '-~=--=:::=..:-=~= -=-=-\' ,'\ ,". "''''','C\,
'. -- " --', -- - - -- -, ., ""
~~ -: " I-::..;¿-.j,:!'...:'-=-~.:;-~~-==~~=;Ö::_..:--- Rg "c,~ ., ~ð>,~~> ~"','~z"
" . '-- - -- - , - --, " ", ,
"'.~ ,;:0' ,CV-AÓ=_ "-- " ~ """,v,,,
'" '_Cõn "'>-M;-"C~ ""'" '.! ~,.. "~'~'\~)~'~"" /
V~ ., . "'''" "" ,
(N) VERIZ~SI:~~~ I I,"~ " .,"'''' ! ""~'~"'" r /
-- - -- " . -- "'"'' --/ , , .
TEj, POR~~flAfI"KIHG-" '/>-.'1 \ "~I' ,_" ""'."'"" _ /, /.
- ,. -- :.. - '" """ , , ", ,
" . i" , _,~, ""'"'''''' / ___ /,," " ,
- ~ " \ , '''w, , , ,', __ "
.,,~ , , "C" '"",,,,, / "/ i-c.,¡ /' /
V"ULT "'. 'i-J"\ "~ví> '~';" , ,'.~, / .'
X. .~ " , /
_X ,1+' , w, ""--I / /'.'
..,¡ \ J'~"')" I
(E) mea \:., '..' '. ", "Y!/ ,
-. - , , '" ... , ,
I , I .\ / ."" j' i .\
,'1 '" ',\.
ß ' ¡ '" ",
¡~,:'¡"~Oo'c,\, ./ "'''- \ '''. \,\....,.
/ ''. '" "'", '" "
"". \\, "" '\, "
m~ / .,' ". ','
" '0-v,,,
/. . '" "~'"
" '<,
/' ',,,
. '"
/ "-',
./. .",,,
/ '"
/ ,
,
""
,
"
"
Bit 342
".P.N.
342-12-030
A.P.N
/
/
/
/
¢~/
.¡;''/
",/
/
/
---1
V"ULT
'''''
,
~
\
i
SITE PLAN
SC...L£:,"..J()'-O·
\
\
i
\
,
\
\
~
<
.
i
,
g
õ
;!
~
"
g
""
!
i
!
¡
i
\
ì
ì
>
,
.
.
"
1,.
"
,
¡¡
\
\
) \
\
';;;,
;\
~ :
~\
"
¡
b
(E) "CP"VEt.4ENT
V"ULT
'''''
,
-----
E~C. - £1.D05-17
eN \ L .Qi(? - ~~r ~13
.~~,...,~.¡... !'I.."'....~
J42-63-oo1
(E) El£C'fRIC"L
V"ULT
E) TELCO VAULT
(E)CONCRETr
'"
".P.N.
(E) 12·-0' 'MO£
CRA'oEL "CCESs ROAQ
,
,C
w
..
,
:
¡
--- --
,¡,
1>~>
, o;¡,
"Ô."
YER!ZGO ~
'MREL£SS I
EOUlPMENT 112
SHELTER
·
~
;1
S
·
~
~
/
t
i,
~
!
·
",
g
õ
~
~
~
¡
..
.,
·
",
õ
~
o
·
~
~
;:
o
,
~
s
~
o
"
o
,¡
¡
~I >.
..
..
'¡ð
..
H
~i ~~
J~ It I I 1111 iiI
-
-
\/:'"" . I
vertZQ!1wlre ess
YEIUZOI<wRD.ESS
21eWTl>tEl.1-DRM'
-..uTCREEK.CA.HSII
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVALS
lEASING: DATE_
ZONING: DATE_
RF ENGINEER: DATE:_
CONSTRUCTION: DATE_
EQUIP, EHeR: DATE_
OWNER: DATE:_
SITE NO 161556
APPROVED BY .S
DRAWN BY IN
'KED BY .S
I
REVIEW
SUBMITTAL
20';"'C" VERJZON WlREL.ESS LEASE AREA
SEE SURVEY SHEET 2 or 2 FOR LEASE AREA lOCATION
'.
6'1-C-
APPROVAL
-
-
'\_1<,
~
'::~~ .
J''':''O"
- -
HVAC
-
(,)
- -
(N) HV"C
z
.
b
,
;.,
,------
I
I
I
I
I
iI-~:;¡ - ;)oc6
O.u
Plamlir.g ('¡>iIIIJIJU!/JI
SignalulC
'or .t>
/;y(./11'
FOOTING
''''-1<
,
1S'-0·
"'0
~\'-q,
'.\,
i>.
\
,
,
(N) WAVEGUIDE
"""
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'\
,
I I
,
I I
-,' :1
~
I
I
I
N)OOOR
(N) 11'-/1" . 20'-0·
VERIZON WIRELESS
EQUiPMENT SHELTER
(N) "lRce BOX
(N) TOP OF SLAB
ELEv...TlON:4JZ·-S·...USl
(N)EIAERGENCY
G[N[R,t,TOR
IIE:CEPTACL£
-A---_
- -
(N}YERI2ONWlREl£SS
GPS ANTENNAS
@
- -
-
/_---J----
/' I (N)
I
I-
r
.
''"''
I
J----
I
TITLE
SHELTER AREA &.
ANTENNA PLAN
SHEET
>
\
\
\
í
>
\
:)
I
-, \
I
1 I
: I ,,"
I ,
--~¡................
I /' I. "-
/ 17 -.., __
r ,'I L"-.----. !
I ' I
I
I I
'I· 1
L _
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
\
\ .-
\ )':;-°s(t.lfJ'I.1
U~\n'('"
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
·
~
..
;
'¡:¡
:;¡
·
·
z
o
N
~
b
,
~
-
-
,
~--
5'-6"
f
I (N) OISCONNECl
SIIITCH
!:r
. -'
(')
«() SPRINT PCS
PANEL "NTENNA,
(T'fP. or 2)
(N) V[RIZON WIRELESS
PANEL "NTENNA.S
(J SE:CTORS, 2 ANTENNAS
PERS£CTœ) 6B
(N) TOP HAT
(XTEN$H)N
(E)P04:ELATTlCE
"""
~
A.?.. '.50'
...-"'- --
- -
//):::;i ,/
"-C, ~\\'<;;
-' ,".~ -
---'" ....
/
-~
- wz
Ow
0>
,~
o.
,w
~¡:¡
gt!
·
\
\
,---"',----
(N)VERIZ~IIIREL£SS
NON-EXQ.USlYE 9',14'
TEMPORARY EWERŒNCY
C£NER"TQRPARKING
,-I
\
\
\
",.
1 /--
-1"-
>
\
\
\
L..j-
~-
-- ,
/" . _-I
/
/
-
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
./
----
-_...>---
---
SHEET NUMBER
A-2
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
~
~
SHELTER PLAN
SCALE, J/8"" 1'-0'
TO(N)I\NTENNAS
WOUNTED ON
POkE: LA mcr TOWER
,
~".,
.,,;.
c'-
ANTENNA PLAN
SCALE: 1/2"-1'-0"
2
"
>
·
N
N
g
"
o
·
o
·
¡
¡
"
"
~
o
·
~
o
~
~
<:
~
~
]
·
",
·
õ
~
3
"
¡
"
~
.I,
·
"
,
~
o
·
~
~
·
-
/
< ///
-
/
T2~~¡"
P.o.c.
~-~
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
c~ /
Ë3 /
:1,f.1\_ /
~ò. /
"'. J
g¡¡; _--t---
-,,;J.,.---
--
--,,-
--
, --
.-i-""',-
--_.;,,----~-
-----
----
hi t!:¡;g
.n~
.ið"
..:i'i>
i1~
~I ~li
~ 11.
J~ 1~111111 ill!
-
-
~ ,
ve"7onwlreless
-~
171SMllt:!tEU.ÞRM:
IW..NIIrCllEtI\,CO_
FOOTHILL . McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVAlS
lEASING: ",TE_
ZONING: ",TE_
RF ENGINEER: DATE:_
CONSTRUCTION: ",TE_
EQUIP. ENGR: ",TE_
OWNER: OATE:_
ISITE NO 161556
IAPPROVED BY "'
I DRAWN BY IN
I CHECKED BY "'
NO nAT¡:- IS'
2 09/06/05 ZD REVIEW
09/19/05 ZO SUBMITTAL
SHEET TITLE
NORTHEAST ELEY A TION
SHEET NUMBER
A-3
-
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
~.
i~
III:iII
"--~----.._--"--_.-
_::~~~::;' ~~~~~~~~~:..;::~ =
i\fÄ~~ ""'~ ;¡,;.;_ ~ '''j~~t;<w ~ ~~ ~
=::::-==~~;:~~:-
~~~
E) 12'-0· 'MOE PA'ÆD ACCESS ROAD
NORTHEAST ELEVATION
.. -
SCALE: 1/8".1'-0·
APPROVAl.
Plam¡/ng Comm/¡sloi/ /I-';¡;¡-.;loD5
u...
Signatllre L ...
CalC ..., ,
(N)VERIZONWlRE!..ESS
EaJlPMENTSHELTER
@(N)V[RIZC»>lWlRElESS
CPS ANTENNA
T2 (TYP.orz)
(N) VERlZON WIRElESS
UNDERGROUND COAXI....I
"'L<
@
(N) VEF/IZON WIRElESS
PANEl ANTENNAS
PSECTORS.
2 AN'ŒNN"'S PER SECTOR)
EXTENSION
"
(E) CONCRETE PAQ
""""'''''''
"'"
,
TOP OF (N)VE:RIZONWIRELESS AN"TENNAS
94'-0" .....C.L.
CENTER OF (1'1) VEflIZON WIRELESS ANl'ENNAS
92·-0· .....G.l.
TOP OF (E) PG&E LAT11CE TOWER
62'-0· .....G.L
(E) pG&( INSULATOR AAIo1
76'-5· A.C.l.
(E) PC&( INSULATOR AAIo1
67'-2" .....G.l.
(E) PG&E INSULATOR ARIo1
57'-1" A.G.l.
(E) PG&E LAT11CE TOWER
(E)SPRINTPCS
ANT£NHAS
CENTER OF (E) SPRlNTPCS ANTENNAS-
25'-10" .....«
(E) GRACE
0'-0· A.G.l
(E) SPRINT
EOUIPWENT
,
,
E)CON~ETE WAll~ --
·
;;
·
·
·
8
"
o
n
o
·
,
·
!
.;
~
~
~
a
/
t
-;;
i,
5
]
"
u,
·
Õ
~
~
~
¡
1
,
¡
u,
·
u,
~
o
·
~
~
·
~I ·
·
·
·
i
~I 8
0
"
J~ ~lllllllml
~~j~
" .
-
-
\,./:"
Ve"70nwire/ess
vElll2Dt1W1R1J..£SS
27e WIfCH[U D!!M:
WAUfUTCftUK,CA~NI
FOOTHILL & McCLELLAN
SITE NO. 161556
10110 CALIFORNIA OAK WAY
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
APPROVALS
lEASl~: DATE_
ZONING: o.TE,_
RFENGlNEER: OAT£:_
CONSTRUCTION: DATE_
EQUIP. [NGR: DATE:_
OWNER: DATE:_
SITE NO 161556
APPROVED BY .S
DRAWN BY IN
CHECKED BY .S
Nn nATç ISSUE
æ 09/06/05 ZD REVIEW
09/19/05 ZD SUBMITTAL
SHEET TITLE
NORTHWEST ELEVATION
SHEET NUMBER
A-4
-
COMPANY JOB NO. CA0242
--~
i
f,y.c. - ';¡oD6 -I? ;
¡ ..,-..\-'. I J?lK' - ;JU'!-":dß. \
.\...,.....,...".........., I
PL-<o::;t~g C:--i:: ,.:1:;,: .1L 2:;1. ~lf5 \
\
.
Si¡;nalUre
OVERHEAD TRANSMISSiON UN(S
MO( PAVED ACCESS ROAD _ - ---
-.-- ------- - ---
12'-0'
,
TOP or (N) Y(RIZON WlRElf.:SS ANTENNAS
9~·-O· A.G.L
CENTER Of (N) VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS
~iI2'-O' A.G.L
TOP or (E) PG4£: LAmer TO¥I£R
~\;¡,;¡~.,
~'.\.,ir,.!..
.)1t£..'
-',"'W--
:¡l~i
p:q¡
~I)W
,.,
~- "f\~~--
~.~
~"
"
,-\\
-~:<~-
¡T)Þ\i¡
" "'"
iè==-n
(E) PG&E LAT11CE TOWER ii '\,.::'\!
l>~~~,
(E)SPRINTPCS ý:::;;;,_ ..:,'0':
....NTENN....S ,(~.:::;:>-<..Z~_
~'"",,__ f' ì\
~D~D
~
!i """
" %
",P
"
--~~
~:~~z:=::~~
(N)VERtZ
EOU PIolEN'r.,~RELESS
........LT[R
~,-
~. ~,"""~ ------- - -,-. ----
-*'i.t;6c? ~ ~-
:~~-;-~
NORTHWEST ELEVATION
SCALE, Ij1!"."-O·
,
(N)VERIZONWlRELESS @
P""ELANTtNNAS 4
(J SECTORS. T2
2 ANTENH"S PER SECTOR)
HATE)(TENSlON
(N) VERlZON WlREWiS 6B
GPS ANTENNA
(TYP.OF':2) 12
",e
(N)
(£) PG&:E INSULATOR ARM
76'-5· A.C:L
ANlENNAS
".
".
SPRlNTPCS
(E) pekE INSULATOR
i7·-2~'A.-G.L .
E) PG&E INSULATOR
CENTER Of
GRADE
CONCRE1t WAlL
,
("
,
~
>
·
"
~
"
o
·
o
,
·
~
¡
t
i
o
<
5>
a
"
t
<:
i,
8
¿
]
·
",
·
õ
~
5>
i
i
.,
¡
~
õ
i
<
5>
5>
"