The URL can be used to link to this page

02. Jitka Cymbal CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: TM-2005-14 Jitka Cymbal Jing and Roger Low 21988 McClellan Road Agenda Date: January 10, 2006 Application Summary: TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide a 21,803 square foot lot into two parcels (11,385 and 10,418 square feet in size) in a Rl-7.5 zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the tentative map, file number TM-2005-14 in accordance with the model resolution. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Total Acreage (gross): Net Acreage per parcel: Density: Low Density Residential, 1-5 DU/ gr. acre Rl-7.5 21,803 square feet Lot 1- 9,766 sq. ft., Lot 2-10,418 sq. ft. 4 du/ gr. acre. Project Consistency with: General Plan: Zoning: Yes, Policy 2-23 Yes Categorically exempt. Environmental Assessment: BACKGROUND: The project site is located on the northeast corner of McClellan and Madrid Roads. A main residence, a second unit, and a detached garage currently exist on the unimproved parcel. Single-family residential parcels surround the subject parcel. DISCUSSION: There are two major discussion points for this subdivision: conformance with the General Plan, since the applicant is proposing a flag lot, and tree removal and retention. Following is a detailed discussion of each subject. Zoning and General Plan Conformance: Lot one (the flag lot) equals 11,385, but has a net lot area of 9,766 since the panhandle portion of the lot (driveway) is not counted in the net area calculation and lot two equals 10,418 net square feet. Since both proposed lots have net areas greater than the 7,500 square feet required for the Rl-7.5 zoning district, the subdivision is consistent }-I TM-2005-14 Page 2 January 10, 2006 with the zoning. The residential density at 4 d.u.j gross acre is also consistent with the general plan land use designation (Low Density Residential, 1-5 DU / gr. Acre). In the recently adopted General Plan, Policy 2-23 was added to address neighborhood compatibility. Specifically, the policy ensures "that zoning, subdivision and lot line adjustment requests consider the need to preserve neighborhood lot patterns." It also specifically addresses the subject of flag lots by allowing the creation of "flag lots in proposed subdivisions when they are the only reasonable alternative that integrates with the lot pattern in the neighborhood." Staff believes that in the case of this subdivision, since there is insufficient frontage to subdivide the parcel into two conventional lots, the creation of a flag lot is the only reasonable alternative that integrates with the surrounding lot pattern. The adjacent lots to the north and south are flag lots and there appears to be a clear pattern in this area of flag lots. The clear pattern is demonstrated in the aerial below (subject parcel is highlighted in yellow): Tree Removal and Retention: Nine trees are located on the subject property, three of which are significant and two that are protected under the Cupertino Municipal Code. The City's consulting arborist, Barrie D. Coate and Associates conducted a tree survey of the property in October 2005 (see summary below and enclosures). Mr. Coate recommends that the coast live oak G:IPlanning\PDREPORT1pcTMreports\2005tmreportsITM-2005-14. doc J,:) TM-2005-14 Page 3 January 10, 2006 tree, located near the existing garage at the rear of the property, and the large deodar cedar, shown on the site plan as a pine tree near Madrid Road, be protected. He has provided detailed instructions on how to protect the coast live oak and the deodar cedar. As a condition of approval, staff is requiring a tree protection bond and requiring that the applicant enter into an agreement with a licensed arborist to ensure compliance with Mr. Coate's recommendations. Additionally, Mr. Coate recommends staff consider retaining a silk tree along the northern property for screening purposes. Staff is recommending that the tree be retained as a condition of the tentative map approval and that the retention be reviewed again at the building permit stage. The Director of Community Development shall make the final decision on the retention of the tree since it is not a protected species and would be retained only for privacy screening. Finally, although the applicant shows they are planning to retain an elm tree, Mr. Coate recommends removal due to decay and a hollow trunk. Tree # and Type Condition Recommendation Notes (Refer to Arborist ReDort\ #1 Coast Live Oak Fair Retain Extremely healthy oak specimen, but its structure makes it highly vulnerable to limb breakage. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to follow the recommendations of the consulting arborist to preserve the tree and ensure healthv retention. #2 Siberian Ehn Poor Remove Tree has been stub cut in the past and major decay has resulted. Trunk is hollow due to an old wound. Consulting arborist recommends removal of the tree due to the current state of health. #3 California Date Pahn Excellent May be retained, Not a significant species, tree can easily removed or be transplanted or removed at transulanted. auulicant" s discretion. #4 Deodar Cedar Excellent Retain Fine specimen of Deodar Cedar that has been overgrown with English Ivy. Ivy needs to be removed to preserve tree. Arborist also makes further recommendations for protecting and preserving. As a condition of approval the applicant will need to follow these recommendations. #5 Silk Tree Excellent May be retained or Not a significant species, mostly removed. ornamental tree. G: \Planning\PD REPOR TlpcTMreports 12005 tmreports ITM-2005-14.doc ;)/3 TM-2005-14 Page 4 January 10,2006 Tree # and Type Condition Recommendation Notes (Refer to Arborist Report) #6 Silk Tree Fair May be retained or Not a significant species, mostly removed. ornamental tree. #7 Silk Tree Fair May be retained or Not a significant species, mostly removed. ornamental tree. #8 Eugenia Excellent May be retained or Not a protected species. removed. #9 Silk Tree Excellent May be removed or Not a significant species, mostly retained. ornamental tree. However, serves as privacy screening between subject property and the adjacent property to the north. As a part of the tentative map application, staff is recommen<ling the tree be retained. At the building permit stage, staff will evaluate whether it is feasible to reWn the tree and the Director of Community Development will make the final decision. Prepared by: Gary Chao, Associate Planner c:::::::Þ Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme~ Enclosures: Model Resolution for TM-2005-14 Plan Set Exhibit A: Tree Survey & Arborist Report G: \Planning\P D REPORT1pc TMreports \2005 tmreports\ TM-2005 -14. doc J--4 TM-2005-14 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 21,803 SQUARE FOOE LOT INTO TWO PARCELS, 9,766 SQUARE FEET AND 10,413 SQUARE FEET RESPECTIVELY AT 21988 MCCLELLAN ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: TM-2005-14 Jitka Cymbal (Low residence) 21988 McClellan Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially harm fish and wildlife or their habitat. e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems. J.-5 Resolution No. Page 2 TM-2005-l4 January 10, 2006 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application TM-2005-14 for a Tentative Map is hereby approved as modified, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TM-2005-14, as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approved is based on the tentative map entitled "TENTATIVE MAP, LANDS OF DANNY LEE, 21988 MC CLELLAN ROAD, CUPERTINO" by Westfall Engineers, Inc., dated November 2005, and consisting of two sheets labeled pages 1 and 2, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEMOLITION The applicant is required to demolish existing structures in accordance with City demolition procedures. 3. COVENANT FOR TREE PROTECTION The applicant shall prepare and record a covenant that runs with the land, prior to final map approval, acknowledging the protective status of the Coast Live Oak, Deodar Cedar and the Silk tree identified as #9 in the consulting arborist report dated October 24, 2005, notifying future property owners of the kinds and numbers of trees protected by City Ordinance and the requirement for a tree removal permit for these trees. The covenant shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. All protected trees on site shall be fenced off during construction, watered on a regular basis and no trenching shall be done within 6' of the tree trunks. In the event that any trees need to be relocated or removed due to required improvements, a tree removal application' may be made to the Director of Community Development. 4. TREE PROTECTION BOND The applicant, prior to approval of the final map and building permit approval, shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $30,000 to ensure protection of existing trees on the site. The bond shall be returned after completion of G:\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\200S\ TM-200S-14 res. doc ,J-fo Resolution No. Page 3 TM-2005-l4 January 10, 2006 construction, subject to a letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition. 5. TREE PROTECTION STANDARDS The applicant shall enter into an agreement with a licensed arborist to oversee the protection of the three aforementioned trees during construction on the property. Th~ agreement with the arborist shall reference the recommendations for protection of the aforementioned trees as presented by Barrie D. Coate and Associates in the arborist report dated October 24, 2005. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS: The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 8. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 9. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 10. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City, San Jose Water Company and Santa Clara County Fire. 11. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. G:\P1anning\PDREPORT\RES\2005\ TM-2005-14 res.doc ,},-'7 Resolution No. Page 4 TM-2005-l4 January 10, 2006 12. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers andj or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 13. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post storm drain calculations are required 14. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City and Santa Clara County Fire, as needed. 15. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 16. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: h. Street Tree $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $2,785.00 min. $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,000.00 min. $ 2,000.00 $ 640.71 Not Required $ 3,250.00 $15,750.00 By Developer Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. G:\Planning\ PDREPORT\ RES\2005\ TM-2005-14 res.doc ~-B Resolution No. Page 5 TM-2005-l4 January 10, 2006 -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 17. TRANSFORMER Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 18. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 19. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. 20. DRIVEWAY EASEMENT The developers of both Lots 1&2 must submit a signed agreement approved by the City, which sets aside a driveway easement along their adjoining properties. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development G: \Planning\PDREPORT\RES\ 2005\ TM-2005-14 res.doc Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission J-0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREE PROTECTION DURING DEMOliTION AND CONSTRUCTION AT THE LEE PROPERTY 21988 MCCLELLAN ROAD, CUPERTINO Assignment Mrs. Ghosh asked me to prepare an analysis of the trees at this property in order to protect them fTom upcoming demolition and proposed construction activity. Summary The site currently is occupied by a home and two small axillary structures which I presume will all be demolished. There are only three significant trees on the property, trees #1, 2, and 4 which are a vigorous healthy coast live oak, a Siberian elm with a very poor structure, and a fine specimen of deodar cedar. The plan I reviewed for tlns project is titled sheet Al prepared by H.M.C. Associates, ,LLP, undated. This plan shows only one of the trees on the property to be preserved, tree #1, the large coast live oak. The deodar cedar tree #4 is a species protected by City Ordinance and is a fine specimen at the margin of the propel1y. Observations There are nine trees on the property only three of which are significant and only two of those are protected by City Ordinance. The two protected trees are trees #1 and #4, a coast live oak and a large deodar cedar. The third significant tree is a Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila) a species which is usually considered of poor quality since it is very brittle and subject to breakage. . The trees #5-9 are Silk trees (Albizziajulibrissin). Trees 5-7 are seen on the Madrid Road fTontage and tree #9 another Albizzia is seen on the north property line. Tree #8 is Eugenia (Syzygium paniculatum) tree on the property line at the southwest comer of the property. Recommendations I. This coast live oak is extremely healthy but its structure makes it highly vulnerable to major limb breakage. I suggest that: a. The horizontal 12-inch diameter limb which is directed east from the point at which it joins the main trunk at 7 feet above grade be removed entirely. PREPARED BY: BARRIE 0, COArE, CONSULTING ARBORIST OCTOBER 24. 2005 ,;)-/1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREE PROTECTION DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION AT THE LEE PROPERTY 21988 MCCLELLAN ROAD. CUPERTINO 2 This will leave a well-balanced crown above it without leaving the high potential for limb breakage that this limb presents. b. Have all deadwood removed &om the tree. c. Have a cable installed between the two remaining main trunks to prevent the included bark site seen at 2 feet above grade resulting in half of the tree splitting apart. d. The tree is fairly heavily infested with Ehrhom scale. , I suggest that it be sprayed this winter wíth a combination emulsifiable oil and an insecticide to begin control of that insect/disease combination. e. I suggest endweight reduction by drop crotch pruning procedures by an ISA certified arborist ITom the western and northern portions of the canopy to prevent limb drop in the next few years. f. Where necessary the lowest hanging branches of 3 inch diameter or smaller could be removed but branches any larger than that should not be removed without consultation with a certified arborist. 2. Tree #2 is Siberian elm The tree has been stub cut in the past at multiple heights including 12 feet, 15 feet, and 20 feet. The result is major decay sites at each ofthese stub-cutting locations. . Note that the trunk is hollow due to an old wound. . I would suggest that removal of this tree would not be significant. 3. Tree #3, a California fan palm, is not significant and since this species is easily transplanted the tree could either be demolished or transplanted at the desire of the owner, in my opinion. 4. Tree #4 is a fine deodar cedar which is unfortunately overgrown with English ivy. a. I suggest the ivy be removed and that the tree certainly be preserved. b. The canopy is composed of very long limbs and it would be wise to have a knowledgeable arborist do drop crotch pruning of the longest limbs to prevent limb breakage in the future but the tree should not have all of the interior branches stripped out which is commonly done since that merely exacerbates the likelihood oflimb breakage. PREPARED BY: BARRIE D, COATE. CONSULTING ARBORIST OCTOBER 24. 2005 J.. -1:< RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREE PROTECTION DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION AT THE LEE PROPERTY 21988 MCCLELLAN ROAD. CUPERTINO 3 c. A 6 foot chain link fence mounted on 2 inch galvanized pipe posts driven at least 2 feet in the ground must be installed in the locations shown on the enclosed plan section before any construction or demolition equipméht' arrives on site. d. I recommend that existing pavement be left in place until all demolition and as much building construction, as possible is completed. e. When existing pavement is to be removed, it must be broken up and the pieces hand loaded into a skip loader backing over unbroken sections of pavement. 5. Trees #5, 6, 7 are in Madrid Road frontage and this area may experience road widening which would remove those but those trees are not protected by City Ordinance in any case. 6. Tree #9 serves an important screen between this property and those to the north and I suggest an effort be made to save that tree for that purpose. 7. Tree #8 the Eugenia tree in the corner is of no significance and is not protected by City Ordinance. Construction Impact The proposed construction design would cause potential damage to trees # I and 4 if they are retained. Tree #1 I. The proposed walkway which would travel beneath the canopy of this tree could be installed if: ¡r. No compaction is done in the area which will be occupied by the walkway before installation. , b. If the walkway is installed on top of the existing grade. c. No wheeled equipment is allowed into the area during the construction of that walkway. d. If the base rock is material which drains at least Yo" per hour to provide oxygen and moisture in the area beneath the paving. 2. The driveway shown beneath the canopy of this tree would cause severe dan1age to the root system if it were installed as driveways are usually installed by excavation of 9 to 12 inches of surface soil. a. If this driveway can be installed on top of existing grade and the base material is of pervious texture that passes at least Yo" of water per hour, (not standard construction road base material) and the pavement surface is of a material that passes water rapidly as well, this driveway could be installed as shown. PREPARED BY: BARRIE D. COATE. CONSULTING ARBORIST OCTOBER 24. 2005 dH3 RECOMMENDA nONS FOR TREE PROTECTION DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION AT THE LEE PROPERlY 21988 MCCLELLAN ROAD. CUPERTINO 4 Be aware that no equipment may be allowed in the area in which that drive is to be installed before installation of the road. It must be leveled by hand tools. If this pervious paving approach is not acceptable to City Engineers, I suggest that concrete be poured over the undisturbed base material with sufficient rebar in it to support it without 95% compaction before installation. If impervious paving is used, the newly installed portion of the driveway which would be beneath the canopy however must have perforated areas down to original soil grade in at least 10% of its surface. These may be take the form of 2 to 4 inch wide strips in which strip drains are installed or stripes cut through the paving with bricks set into them. 3. Tree #4 I suggest a construction period fence be erected as shown on the plan before any equipment arrives on scene. Signs that enclosed should be mounted on 10- foot intervals along the top of the fence to prevent sub contractors rrom tearing the fence down. Inspections I suggest that arborists inspections be scheduled after: 1. Protected fences are installed but before demolition begins. 2. After demolition is completed. . 3. During the installation of the driveway and the walkway shown beneath tree #1. Respectfully submitted, ~~.~ Barrie D. Coate BDC/sl Enclosures: Tree Data Accumulation Chart Tree Preservation Sign Site Plan Pictures PREPARED BY: BARRIE D. COATE. CONSULTINGARBORIST OCTOBER 24. 2005 )-/4- Recommend Status , , ........- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '- , , If? , , , , , , ...J I::' , , , _I <CI~ , lO'a:: >1 1('0· ,'Iw 01- ('o.:W """"IN :&ID:: WIW oc'1:JWIQ W,e:: wlt= D:: 0::: a::¡t- ....¡" ~ Q. 1-'0 WIW ~tWIW -J C!>!t; !LL!:! ~ en ICn ' :! <l;lw ole-Io 0 t::lt- w1wlo :2 a::10 W¡Wlw W WI a:: ZIZID::,D:: ::CIa. , , , , , , I x , , , ___.1.~w~_L___.J_w__ ----r---· , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : x I , , , --~T----I"-~-.,..--- ----1"--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___.1.____1.___..1..___ _w_~L___. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , IX , , , ---T-~--I"'---""--- ----1"---' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___.1._~w_L___.J.._~w ____L_w_, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---T~---I"'---"'I"'--- ----1"'--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___J.__w_L___.J..___ ____1.___, , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---"1----1"'---.,...--- ----1"'--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___.I.____L___.J..___ ____L__~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , --_!_--_!.._-_.!..--- ____L___ = Best. 5 = Worst Page 1 01 . .. .. .... -.. - . - . . . . · . . . · - · . . .. . . . ,. . Measurements , , , " , " , " , " , " , " -I I W' , , , W' , , , LoLl II- N' IW ;:1 : w , ¡ 00::: I LL vI.&. ¡ ("II """w, 'r.i \\::VI- I ~ e:: '" ' W >- t- rJ) : UJ ~ ! I ~=! :I:,J: I '""-..... III ....... , õ:2 c ¡! ¡ - - . 18.0 x 16.01 ¡ ¡ 30 ¡50 ------+---t-------:-- ---- -+----i--- I I , I , 1 I , , t e:: '" :5 :5 ...J ...J o 0 C,.) C,.) I- I- o 0 o 0 e:: e:: o w ~ ;:¡; ¡;; W I- J: C!> [jj J: I ~ w tu ;:¡; <I; õ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES (408)353-1052 2353SSummilRoad Los Galos, CA 95030 f f f , , I I , I I , I ----1---- ---+---i----t---~r--- , ," I I I , , f f I 4 : i----'--- , , , , õ Name Plant Tree # , , , , , , --- ----1"'---.,.._. , , , , , , , I I I , I I I , , I I --- --------+- '~f----I---- , I , I ! I I , , , , , , .-"1----,.--- , , , , , , , 1 Ii' ¡ , 1 I , , 1 I t , r ___..____,.___..,.___.,----"1----1"- , I , 1 I I I I I I I . t' I , t I I " I I ___..1____ ___"""___..1____.1.____1.___ I I I I I . , 1 ! 4 ¡ 5 ---.,..---.,-------' , , , , , , , , , 1 I 1 : 2 I ---+---t----t--- , , , , , , 28.0 ¡ ¡ f ! ¡ 40 130 ______.,..___,.______"'I______,.____.,..__w"""___. 1 I I I 1 I I L r 1 , I I I I 12.0 I 1 : l 1 10 16 ------+---t-------:------I-----+-----I---· , 1 I 1 I I Coast Live Oak ----------------------------~----- i?!~~~~~_~J!':'____________________ Ulmus l'umlla Quercus agrllolla ------2------- -----_?_------, i t I 1 I I ¡ : : ---...----I"'---.,..-~-.,----I"'---' 1 I t I , , I I I I . 1 , I , I I I 1 ---t--~-----+---f----I_--- 1 I I I , I L I I I i X I 1 I x I I ---..--------r---..----,.----,.--- I 1 I , I I I I I I I I I I I l' ------~- ---~I_---_:---- ----1---- I I I r I II! 1 11 ¡ 2 ¡ ---.,..---.,----I'--~ , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 I 1 : 2 I ___.J..~__.I____I.___ , , , , , , , , , 35.0 1 ¡ ¡ ¡ ! 70 145 ------T---r----w-,------r----T----'---- I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I: : 111 15130 ------T---t-------:-~---- ----T----i---' 1 I I I I I ___m~_______g_~~!~.!"!:1J?_P.?_I!.??J!':'___________ Washlnstonia fililera Deodar Cedar ._---~-------------------~----~---- Cedrus deodara 4 ----~-----~--- I I , I ---.,.----1"'---"'1"'--- ----1"'---' I I I I t 1 I I I 1 I 1 , 1 I ___J.____...___.J..__~.1____I.._~_ , I t I I 1 I I I , , , , , , , , , ---"~---I'----r-' , , , , , , , , , I I I , I I ___..I__~_ ___-'-~ ~_..L___~ ____1.___ I I 1 'I 1 I I i , , , , , , --.,----r----I"'~-- ¡ : I ! 3 ¡ 1 ¡ 4 ¡ ---..,..---.,----,,--_. , , , , , , , , , , , 3: 3 I 6 ___.J..___.I____ ___ , , , , , , ¡! ¡ 12112120 ------.,..---T-~----.,------ ----...,..---~.,---- ¡ ¡ ¡ 6 ¡ ¡ I 1 1 I 1 10 I 15 15 __~___.J..___.L______.I____~_ ____-'-____ ---' I I I I I t i?!l~_"!:~~_"______m______m__m_ ~----- Albizia julibrissln i?!l~_"!:~~~ -----_?_-~----, 6 ------------- ill I I I I I I I I ---"1----1"'---.....---.,----1"'---' I I I 1. I I , I I 1 I I I I , I I I 1 , I I __~....____...___.J..___.I~___...___ L L I L I I I 1 I I , I I I I I I I I I I 1 ---r-~~r---T---T---r--T---· I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I , I , I 1 ___.____.L___.....___..L_~__.I.____...___ I I I . t 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 ¡ 1 ¡ 2 ---..,....---.,---- ---. , , , , , , . , , 1 I 1 I 2 : ___.J..___.I____.L___ , , , , , , , . , ¡ ¡ ¡ 12 ¡ 20 ¡ 6 ------..,..---"1------.,------ -----r----"f---' I! I I I 1 I I I I I I I 6.0 1 x : 8.0 I 1 1 10 : 20 ______.J..___.L______.I______L____..L..____..I___ I I 1 I I I L I I I I I I I Silk Tree ----~---------------------------- ~!_!g~.n.~§_______m____m________ Syzyg_ium paniculatum 7 --~---------- 8 -----~------- , 1 , I I ___.!_~__L___..!...___.!.____L___ ill i I 1 ___J____!.___..!..___J____.!.____L_~_ 21988 McClellan Road. Cupertino , , , , , , ___...!-___l____!.___ I , I I I . I I I --_!_----_.!_~---_!.~--_..!..---_.!_-- , , t 9 Silk Tree --------------..--------------~------------------- - Job Name: Lee Job #: 10-05-229 Date:Oct. 24, 2005 ~ ....\.. Ü\ WA ING TREE PRESERVATION AREA KEEP OUT NOTICE: PROTECTIVE TREE FENCING IS REQUIRED ON THIS JOB SITE. ITS REMOVAL OR DAMAGE MAY RESULT IN A FINE. This card must be posted on the protective fencing onSO foot centers .for each protected tree on the job site, and remain up during the entire construction period. Fencing may not be removed without written pennission of the Town Arborist. During demolition and construction all reasonable steps necessary to prevent damage, or the destruction of protected trees is required. Failure to comply with all precautions may result in a STOP WORK order being issued by the Town. Call 50 yyi E' C()6í~p flVìd Ao:;;soc, t-(08'-J5?r 1052 for infonnation ¿)-Ih Q (I U. 1 ~.: <.. ( (f (j <:¡ c.; " ~ ", I. I' I I I! [i i: , ì ! i r , " ~ I' r r ~ ¡ i ~ v, Tree Preservation Detail at the lee Properly HORTICULTURAl CONSULTANTS CONSULTING ARSORISTS BARRIE D. COATE "\ " 21988 McClellan Road, Cupertino ., ¡, I.. ,-'~ '" , ...,.... Prepared at the Request of: and ASSOCIATES (~œ)353-1115: ¡ I I I i. ! 1-. ~ ¡,,¡ f..) ;z: LL1 a VJ :;! 1:0 III VJ o p., o "" "- Walk On Top Of Existing Grade . k-"'-' , -t~ ;---- 1 " :: Ji ,1., i, 'f " :1' ,;\J ';'1 I! ¡.:.-- \\, ! J 9 (h2-7· . Cily of Cupertino. Community Planning Department Oal.: Oclobe( 24. 2005 Job #10-05-229 This logo is attached to a plan done by anolher professional. 'fhe presence 01 this logo is nol for the purpose of claiming credit for the plan but merely to add horticullural or arooricullural information \0 a Ian prepared by other;;. Dt.lSSuIol:liBw LOr~QJ,CA9SOJO Tree numbers correspond to evaluation charls. All dimensions and Iree loca1ions are appro;.:imale. " I "'" ~¡ Must Be . Pervious Base ,ii And Surface ~ I; " -,' -¡[~riP L;o, _, . I I ),1 : "i, ",,' ~ Protective Fence , ~- I -...... -...- .~.' ¡ i i- i -'._-- [ I I l_ ( 1 '''I i i i i i i ii-- I' I : 2f ~ ____J \ ) ., I~ \1 t, 1 , j \i II :1 I [I _1."-_ j ). I -\ ---- i i i i I e 3 , r---- , I , I , I ) rT,~.,- ,I c', ~.....--J I i i I, Ii Ii if ;/ ----'I --- " Ii .! I , 5 1 1, i i i I 1 --' ¡ _I i I i i i J ¡' I ". 6 'f ~Protectjve Fence \ II l ~ - - -\ \ ,I ¡. ( 'Î I~t· ! I I I I I (7 8 , 'f I"J " I: I 1 "I." ~" , ,--- ~ .l. ~ ,1 'I . II, / ~ /I t/ I ì/tì/ ¡I",'/ /1 '" / "1/" , '" j' /1 ¡:::/! ' > VI'; / L //,/1 I 0" A "j / ;)<':,~ _\I ......y J I ~ / / "I' ~ /. I- / ,,/ Ie, "",, " 'i" I, & / . /' 4 ~ I . / / . ' " // I I // r /' / ~"" / /i .¿", I / / rN>,>;/ / I !' ~' , i ' : ""WC" , I í! <0.". / rp- Ir'~wA I '" V 't / Q" I ¡ , ' ' /'IQ, '< / -9- ~ o';,c-o' I 'C~( ó~;t/ 1 I I I ,I I I_fl-"": i:r ¡ ~,. , ~ I I; . < .,! -,~),..; ¡- .,' ¡O t I ,,0 I ,0 , ,>, : ,.:8 ~ -< ! / C/J I I 1/ __11/// /[ ~ < ! II I I ' Þ i" < I / j _//+-----c _---I I < ! , I > / I I ~> / ~ I / v~ ì <;:j Id # -;",,_'Ò" CHAN / / McClELLAN LANE SITE HYANNISPORT -- ORIVE VICINITY MAP 60 40 , ' , ' ¡ : I ,~ I ¡E i < , " I I ' ' " I· I ~ i 8 f ~ I i i --------L____~~~__j p,'sr:)(NC .,ëu¿ EX r--' I j ~-------, 20 __I /' ---------- ~.~ -;:1<) _I <1<;\"'" ,~'è,~'''' ¡ o .9" SHYR ;1'è:"'>: // '-- ---------- ~ ---------N89~-~_.-.--. .- ."00D FElliCE ,a'~:; 60.25' ; 01"P~\tD ~! / -"---j------- / ¡ -~ / "tWA / / / / / 1 / ...,... c.....-~boc. I0079SÞ:io'1IoIty c..........Cttml. Td.2S3-9000 f.,.2S~ W-*fa/l,~'&Ic 14513Bi,;a.iRWWf s-u.øa,CA,95e1O Tel, 161-0244 f.."1-4261 ... Site_ BIIÎIÜI@;_(""""'" Existina__1'tOÍo/aIIiII ""'P<-I_.æUIaIDII ExisIiD&.......R.¡.mlO ~~_R._1_7~ ~,Ia~·--..- o..-"¡s..bdírioIer': EngiDcU: >- () ¡g VI ë -' o o :r () VI :r co 'i' ¡¡¡ Z ::> >- z o ::E w IE '~ . ~ o is b ° z -=--------~~_.._-------" ~ , -, rt-----'-----.-- 1-< ~< 1" "1 GARAr;[ .3H'.C, SL"'" 'x TS C·J~C -~----- ;-' ~ ~)C>, ~'6~' ~' // -;?}:.,~- (j.l°o '+ n ',,--/"0, 0...+ '-'~" '\(' -'-'- R, , ',~ 1 '1,.385s... )"-. I ; ,/ "-1--"--0...<' , /' _._!/ v I --~ ~-! CJr<CS~A~VAJ '.'_; i ~ ' I '"~ I I \--:~-'1 '.j I 'J.' ~.E':K I'" ;d;''C' '--~~~fJ<;"' \;::, ; .;r:> w::cc· > '--, '-', "- ~'''''}......~: '\ '1,. / \ ¡:::r------~--", . r-- ~ "jr,t· (_.(-- r~,~-""..__ ----~_. --_.~.-- + ~ -\·J,,-_,_)'-)'1 , , I , I ,.---~._--~-~ E):iST:NGRES,![';(NCE F~ :5825 + /.. !....----------:;i~-c:ONc.S.i. ~ -----.---.-'-- "or;· ,'6"" '::.,",'. ....---- / ------- "6'), "'1:'" , -..<:,\ " ,c / ::1 <I: o æ ::1 ....... æ ::1 <I: :::E ./' JOaNa. 2005-085 SHEET (]F' , ~ TENTATIVE MAP LANDS OF DANNY LEE 21988 McCLELLAN RI)AD. CUPER!lND 84.00' 8"'1 DATE DATE, NOVEMBER 2005 4 SCALE, HCJ<:. l' ~lD' WESTFALL ENG I NEERS, INC VERT. DESIGNED' JC IN' "'" """. '" 3"",1 CHECKED< KC DATE. 14583 BIG BASIN liAY, SARATOGA. CA 95070 (408)e67-0<~' P&g. ¡;II K TAN ,!.~i::; 200.231 N( 116.00' ZHAO 'o'èr:;_'6'":. REVISI()ll DATE " "J. McClEUAN LANE w z .. ~ ''0 .."" :0 SITE I?$l; ~ HYANNISPORT -- DRIVE VICINITY MAP -;.. >- o ¡;;: V> is ~ o o :J: ~ :J: " ;: t5 z ::> >- z o " "' e: .> ",¡ 1 I '" / / YI / / > /IIV,/ L /. I / <::;4- foBI,¡ _y--ç:. Y ~ _",. ..' ~ / D".. ~ / " I ./ ;; P' /, ~/ '" . '/ / // r/ / / ~;; // / ¢ I / /1 ""¿,,,,,,,,,,, / I / I ." > ..' I { .... f.--ý !, / r- . ~ I '. /'- 1/ ",'? / Q / 1/ '! ~,,\, : t"'-I'o,! ~/ I ! '''1- / / ~ /// i / ~~rl IJ' 'k" I ~ ~ PI kf1i~ o II < ! / æ: ry 1=1 II J/ i ~'-'1:"'-' < [ 1=1 I Ii / <I: I < !/ :::E 1':/+--,(/ .~--' I < 60 40 RES;,~NCE 38'l4 _L -;.. .1 ~ ", ~I ! !I ' .. ' ~I ~ " , ;., g g g .. ,,0:; " F,r .,Ø/ ø~ t¡ - , 20 ----- . , ~ I ' : , CARAGE i T.5.381.5 PAD~Oo ~ ¡z ª 8 EX GARAG T.S,3BJ.O L ". ; i. " l--" " 4~ PROPOSED RESIDENCE "-/1 F.F.JB2.0 : PAD 379.0 I ;~ i '"': 1. IL "s'" s,· o - ·"'---";1 CHAN .> ;;11-'; , b' " SHYR ~C' )"!P ._~ / --.~-- / ~-------------t<S9"59'"'3'5"w-¡~'--~--~--"-'-' - - - ~ - - - - -I3'IIiOO()-'E~ .- .- - - - - - - - -- $D76'~6"Þ\tc 09" " --.:... -!)' - ø ~. 80.2S· 3D ___ :=>"bc-<+ ~ 0'10. C\. sq.f\ ,,, .' 1,,>~;\J' '"'--r " .~ "" 'Q rr~ q , -¿í· " " Ay , .J \r' t, ~ '. ~ ...:ri·' <,;:;:/,:P GARAGE . T.S.381.0 PAD 380.0 ,r,,'-"Y"'r ...(' '--. ---~.;_i.-___.-----.L1.._:__~. r- ) '-'~.., ' . <'. -1;--''----1--..... PROPOSED RESIDENCE F.F. EL 382.5 PAD 379.S ~ of) -;,'è'" / / / , ; It. // / / -/ / , , ! '" " 2 10.418 sq. "1.'>'[ ~ / 1 I > I > I / /~ I~ / v* 1<:7 /d * /' / ,~ ---; ',-) S :I,~ C::-'NCSL'"~,"'AL' I· ¡ ~" , , i~ : I I I ~. I , I" '~' : \..-:'------, ~<j ?'~: I .v'" ,_~/ -\"""'I '." " .~ ,.. , j ~/Í I " "aeJ' ~?, ~ I d':: 1// . L_~~~~~~___~__J - I //J ;v C:.!NC SU,5 1./ ~~~ -----'/ N89·4S50E 200.2' ~-=1-J I I _ ,j , L4--,--- "( ..-I:'JNC.:SLA8 . ~/ \_..-=--~- ~6-, '~ />" 4.!'~ <> ' -~-- i ~.'þ' ~J ENC! -;-1- O:X!ST!WiRESj[ IT ~8¡5 - -;..{ " ;'00;:;- -;~-,G 84.00' ,-' .' . ;;¿:.'¡' / )6'101001) :,)'[ \,.-----\-.,¡ '&. ~*' .-' . , '-" , ,- ç'J"'.' '., '[NCE ;J ',' 116.00' 'Jl'J'Ò" " --"J,-)'-.~ I < J!llND. 2OO5-08S S>fiT ",' , GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN LANDS OF DANNY LEE ê198S HcCLELLAN ROAD, CUPERTINO TAN ENGINEERS, INC S:AR~TOGA, CII 95070 (400)867-0;;'>.' " , WESTFALL 14583 BIG BASIN 101M, 4 ;;0,.,0 BY't<AR£LCYMBAL, RCE345341 DATE' . 1\IIT(. NOVEMBER 2005 SCAlE' HeR, 1'=10' VEJi!T. DESIGNEI}¡ JC CHrCKED> KC PRDJ.ENI :it: ZHAO DATE " "'~~ REVISION DATE " NO.