The URL can be used to link to this page

18. Peter Ko Use Permit /~I ci~J ~. 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 CITY OF CUPEIQ1NO Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDA NO. Ib AGENDA DATE January 17, 2006 SUMMARY: Application: U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18, EA-2005-16 Applicant: Peter Ko (for Sandhill Properties/Whole Foods Market) Owner: Paul & Barbara Weiss Location: 20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 316-31-018, -020 USE PERMIT to demolish structures associated with a former car dealership and construct a new 68,214 square foot one-story market with mezzanine level. ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL for a new 68,214 square foot one-story market with mezzanine level. RECOMMENDATIONS: On 5-0 votes, the Planning Commission recommended the following actions: 1. the granting of a mitigated negative declaration, file no. EA-2005-16; 2. approving the Use Permit, file no. U-2005-20,.based on the resolution no. 6349; and 3. approving the Architectural & Site Approval, file no. ASA-2005-18, based on resolution no. 6350. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission heard this item on December 20, 2005. Staff presented information pertaining to parking, traffic, site and architectural design in its staff report (Exhibit A-i). DISCUSSION: Public Comments. Various members of the public and the Chamber of Commerce were very supportive of the project (Exhibit B-1). Alves Drive neighbors, who would be most impacted by the project, had a detailed list of IB~\ Printed on Recycled Paper File Nos. U-200S-20, ASA-200S-18 & EA-200S-16 Page 2 January 17,2006 concerns, which is categories: 1) included in Exhibit B-1. Those concerns fell into two Compliance with existing city regulations, governing noise, operating hours, lighting and refuse management. 2) Parking Lot Design-designing Stelling Road driveways for entrance omy with the goal of directing all outbound traffic onto Stevens Creek Boulevard. Staff Comments. There is one significant size tree on the property-a 36" diameter Bay Laurel, which is located in the planned footprint of the proposed Whole Foods Market. The tree is not one of the protected species and its removal would be mitigated by the planting of dozens of proposed trees in the parking lot, along the street and along the building perimeter. With respect to neighbor concerns, existing ordinances regulating commercial noise, operating hours, lighting and refuse management will be followed. Staff pointed out that the noisest area will be near the entrance to the loading dock, which is over 260 feet away from the nearest residence and there are intervening church buildings. There are also building design features that will limit noise: 1) the loading dock will be enclosed and roofed, and 2) most rooftop equipment will be concentrated on the south side of the building roof away from residences. Whole Foods is not proposing late night or early morning hours that require special permission from the City. Building and parking lot lighting is being designed to not avoid glare on adjacent properties. Staff believes that the residents' suggestion to make the Stelling Road driveways "entrance omy," would not resolve the real issue of potential cut-through traffic on Alves Drive. Some late traffic/circulation comments were submitted by the Public Works Department and introduced to the Commission on December 20th (Exhibit C-1). The memorandums recommended additional conditions of approval, including: 1) Having all truck transporters abide by an approved truck route plan; 2) Having the Public Works Department continue to evaluate the on-site circulation plan during the building permit review to ensure that truck turning movements can be negotiated; 3) Conducting traffic engineering studies to evaluate the feasibility of extending the left turn pockets on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard and/ or southbound Stelling Road; and 4) Removing on-street parking on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard adjoining the project site. 1~-2 2 File Nos. U-200S-20, ASA-200S-18 & EA-200S-16 Page 3 January 17, 2006 After the Commission hearing, the Community Development and Public Works Department Directors had further traffic discussions and developed additional concerns that were not expressed in the traffic consultant's study. The concern is to provide for left turns from the project site onto Stelling Road to avoid an excessive number of U-turn movements on the same road. Staff is recommending an added condition of approval to the Planning Commission resolutions that would: Require a traffic engineering study to evaluate the feasibility of allowing controlled left turns from the project site onto Stelling Road and provide funding for such traffic improvements if feasible. The study should include the possible use of the abutting church property in its evaluation. Commission Comments. Overall, the commissioners were pleased with the project design and felt the site was far enough away from the closest residents to not have a noise impact. Their main concerns were with traffic and circulation. The Commission modified staff's recommended conditions of approval by expanding the cut-through traffic study to include the Garden Gate neighborhood, not just Alves Drive, examining the combined impact of Whole Foods and church traffic on Sunday, and prohibiting project construction traffic on Alves Drive. Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6349, 6350 Exhibit A-I: Planning Commission Staff Report dated 12/20/05 Exhibit B-1: Written public comments Exibit C-l: Public Works Dept. Memos (2) Negative Declaration Plan Set Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Submitted by: . /:/'£2-- ..>~~ Approved by: &~di-/~LJ QsL David W. Knapp City Manager Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g:planningl pdreportl eel U-2005-20 ee.doc Iß-3 3 U-2005-20 CITY OF CUPERTINO , 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6349 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A FORMER CAR DEALERSHIP AND CONSTRUCT A 68,214 SQUARE FOOT MARKET WITH CAFE AT 20955 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title; and 3) The proposed development is consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2005-20 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of December 20, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Ico-4 Resolution No.6349 Page 2 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2005-20 Peter Ko (Sandhill Properties/Whole Foods) 20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "WHOLE FOODS MARKET/20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA 95014" dated 12/16/05 and consisting of 13 sheets labeled ASO.O, ASO.1, AS1.0,AS1.1, AS2.0, AS4.0, AS4.1a, AS4.1b, AS4.2, AS4.3, AS4.4, AS5.0,AS6.0, C1 and C2 except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION APPROVAL A development allocation of 68,214 square feet of Heart of the City commercial development potential is granted less the existing building area of the car dealership (30,981 square feet). 3. BICYCLE RACK LOCATION Prior to building permit approval, applicant shall identify an adequate location for a bicycle rack near the store entrance. 4. BUILDING DESIGN CHANGES At the building permit stage, the applicant shall revise the southeast corner of the building or change the side setback to conform to Heart of the City Specific Plan side setback for a commercial building. Design change shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 5. LANDSCAPING CHANGES The applicant shall modify the landscape plan to comply with the Heart of the City landscape standards, including the planting of 36" boxed trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director concurrent with a building permit application 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice Iß-5 Resolution No.6349 Page 3 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and oth'7r exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 7. PUBLIC ART The Applicant shall contribute %% of the construction valuation toward onsite public art. If the artwork is located on the Stevens Creek Boulevard elevation, it should be visible through the landscape improvements and potentially incorporated with the planned building signage. Public art design shall be referred to the Fine Arts Commission for comment. 8. SIGN AGE Signage is not approved with this use permit application. Signage shall conform to the City Sign Code. Applicant may apply for a sign exception as needed. 9. COVENANT OF RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT The applicant shall record a deed restriction for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easement between the subject property and the abutting corner property at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, to be implemented at such time that the City can require the same of adjacent property owners, subject to approval of the City Attorney. The covenant of easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building occupancy. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 10. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 11. CURB AND GUTIER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 12. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. l~rLo Resolution No.6349 Page 4 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 13. TRAFFIC SIGNS. DETAILS AND LEGENDS Traffic control signs, details and legends shall be placed at locations specified by the City. All improvement plans shall include all necessary signage, details and legends along with traffic control plans. 14. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 15. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 16. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 17. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 18. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost $ 5% of On-Site Improvement Cost $ 1,000.00 $13,180.60 ** N/A N/A \~-1 Resolution No.6349 Page 5 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 19. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 20. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 21. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMF's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. 22. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS In addition, the applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and stormwater treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. The property owners with treatment BMPs will be required to certify on-going operation and maintenance. 23. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a notice of intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses a preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control storm water runoff quality and BMP inspection and maintenance. \ lèr £) Resolution No.6349 Page 6 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 24. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on-site. Erosion Control notes shall be stated on the plans. 25. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Envirorunental Programs Department. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 26. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to maintain all non-standard items in the City's Right-of-way. 27. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to the City to be approved to the satisfaction of the Traffic Department. 28. WORK SCHEDULE A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable for all gradingl erosion control work in cònjunction with this project. 29. FLOOR PLAN FOR STORAGE, SORTING AND PROCESSING OF MATERIALS, TRASH AND RECYCLABLES Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a floor plan providing for adequate storage, sorting and processing of materials, trash and recyclables in the interior of the building. Outside storage of materials, trash and recyclables is prohibited, other than items for retail display, customer outdoor furniture and shopping carts. Plan shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 30. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Applicant shall conduct a traffic engineering study to examine the potential extension of the left turn pockets and lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard and lor Stelling Road as described in a traffic report prepared by Pang Engineers rne. and dated 10/28/05. The utility of the "duck-out" Stelling Road lane fronting the project shall also be evaluated. Work shall be coordinated through and approved by the Public Works Department. Street improvements as needed shall be constructed by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 31. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR POTENTIAL CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC Applicant shall fund a study to examine potential Garden Gate neighborhood cut- through traffic resulting from the project. Applicant shall pay for necessary traffic 15-0\ Resolution No.6349 Page 7 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 improvements to alleviate project neighborhood traffic impacts. Work shall be coord,inated through the Public Works Department. The study shall include an analysis of potential traffic impacts resulting from the simultaneous operation of the abutting church and market. 32. PLAN FOR RECYCLE AND/OR REUSE OF DEMOLITION MATERIAL Prior to demolition permit approval, the applicant shall submit a plan for the reuse and recycling of demolition debris. 33. MERGING OF PARCELS Prior to building occupancy, the property owner shall merge the two parcels into one lot. 34. TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENTS The applicant shall develop a truck route plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall ensure that the market and its suppliers abide by the truck route plan. The Public Works Department shall further evaluate and approve the parking layout and circulation to ensure that on-site delivery truck turning movements can be negotiated. 35. REMOY AL OF ON-STREET STEVENS CREEK BOULEY ARD PARKING The Stevens Creek Boulevard on-street parking abutting the project frontage shall be removed as part of the required street improvements. 36. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC Project construction traffic is prohibited from traveling on Alves Drive. \ß-\O Resolution No.6349 Page 8 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice Chair Miller, Chen, Giefer, Saadati COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Gilbert Wong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Planning Commission G :CupertinojPlanning/PD REportjRESjU-2005-20 \ß-\\ ASA-2005-18 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6350 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL FOR A 68,214 SQUARE FOOT MARKET AND CAFÉ AT 20955 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2005-18 Peter Ko (Sandhill Properties/Whole Foods Market) 20955 Stevens Creek Blvd., APN 326-31-018 & -020 SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. The proposal will use materials and design elements that compliment neighboring structures; and 4. The proposal is consistent with the standards and design guidelines of the Heart of the City Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval, File No. ASA- 2005-18, is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and 15-\2- Resolution No.6350 Page 2 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this r¢solution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2005- 18 set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of December 20, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "WHOLE FOODS MARKET/20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA 95014" dated 12/16/05 and consisting of 13 sheets labeled ASO.O, ASO.l, ASl.0,ASl.l, AS2.0, AS4.0, AS4.1a, AS4.1b, AS4.2, AS4.3, AS4.4, AS5.0,AS6.0, Cl and C2 except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION APPROVAL A development allocation of 68,214 square feet of Heart of the City commercial development potential is granted less the existing building area of the car dealership (30,981 square feet). 3. BICYCLE RACK LOCATION Prior to building permit approval, applicant shall identify an adequate location for a bicycle rack near the store entrance. 4. BUILDING DESIGN CHANGES At the building permit stage, the applicant shall revise the southeast corner of the building or change the side setback to conform to Heart of the City Specific Plan side setback for a commercial building. Design change shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 5. LANDSCAPING CHANGES The applicant shall modify the landscape plan to comply with the Heart of the City landscape standards, including the planting of 36" boxed trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director concurrent with a building permit application 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- \~rl~ Resolution No.6350 Page 3 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 7. PUBLIC ART The Applicant shall contribute %% of the construction valuation toward onsite public art. If the artwork is located on the Stevens Creek Boulevard elevation, it should be visible through the landscape improvements and potentially incorporated with the planned building signage. Public art design shall be referred to the Fine Arts Commission for comment. 8. SIGNAGE Signage is not approved with this use permit application. Signage shall conform to the City Sign Code. Applicant may apply for a sign exception as needed. 9. COVENANT OF RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT The applicant shall record a deed restriction for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easement between the subject property and the abutting corner property at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, to be implemented at such time that the City can require the same of adjacent property owners, subject to approval of the City Attorney. The covenant of easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building occupancy. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 10. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 11. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 12. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. 13. TRAFFIC SIGNS. DETAILS AND LEGENDS Traffic control signs, details and legends shall be placed at locations specified by the City. All improvement plans shall include all necessary signage, details and legends along with traffic control plans. 14. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. IB-\L\ Resolution No.6350 Page 4 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 15. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer i\1 accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 16. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 17. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 18. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost $ 5% of On-Site Improvement Cost $1,000.00 $ 13,180.60 ** N/A N/A Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. lÐ-l5 Resolution No.6350 Page 5 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 19. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 20. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 21. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. 22. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS In addition, the applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and stormwater treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. The property owners with treatment BMPs will be required to certify on-going operation and maintenance. 23. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a notice of intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses a preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMP' s) to control storm water runoff quality and BMP inspection and maintenance. 24. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on-site. Erosion Control notes shall be stated on the plans. 25. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Department. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 26. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to maintain all non-standard items in the City's Right-of-way. IB-Ilt? Resolution No.6350 Page 6 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 27. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to the Çity to be approved to the satisfaction of the Traffic Department. 28. WORK SCHEDULE A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable for all grading/ erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 29. FLOOR PLAN FOR STORAGE, SORTING AND PROCESSING OF MATERIALS, TRASH AND RECYCLABLES Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a floor plan providing for adequate storage, sorting and processing of materials, trash and recyclables in the interior of the building. Outside storage of materials, trash and recyclables is prohibited, other than items for retail display, customer outdoor furniture and shopping carts. Plan shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 30. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Applicant shall conduct a traffic engineering study to examine the potential extension of the left turn pockets and lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard and / or Stelling Road as described in a traffic report prepared by Pang Engineers Inc. and dated 10/28/05. The utility of the" duck-out" Stelling Road lane fronting the project shall also be evaluated. Work shall be coordinated through and approved by the Public Works Department. Street improvements as needed shall be constructed by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 31. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR POTENTIAL CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC Applicant shall fund a study to examine potential Garden Gate neighborhood cut- through traffic resulting from the project. Applicant shall pay for necessary traffic improvements to alleviate project neighborhood traffic impacts. Work shall be coordinated through the Public Works Department. The study shall include an analysis of potential traffic impacts resulting from the simultaneous operation of the abutting church and market. 32. PLAN FOR RECYCLE AND/OR REUSE OF DEMOLITION MATERIAL Prior to demolition permit approval, the applicant shall submit a plan for the reuse and recycling of demolition debris. 33. MERGING OF PARCELS Prior to building occupancy, the property owner shall merge the two parcels into one lot. 16-11 Resolution No.6350 Page 7 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 34. TRUCK ROUTE PLAN & TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENTS The applicant shall develop a truck route plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The applicant shan ensure that the market and its suppliers abide by the truck route plan. The Public Works Department shan further evaluate and approve the parking layout and circulation to ensure that on-site delivery truck turning movements can be negotiated. 35. REMOVAL OF ON-STREET STEVENS CREEK BOULEV ARD PARKING The Stevens Creek Boulevard on-street parking abutting the project frontage shan be removed as part of the required street improvements. 36. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC Project construction traffic is prohibited from traveling on Alves Drive. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following ron can vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice Chair Miller, Chen, Giefer, Saadati NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Gilbert Wong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Planning Commission G:CupertinojPlanning/P 0 ReportjRES/ ASA -200S-18 lß-lð f-)'h,bJ~ A-I CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18, EA-2005-16 Agenda Date: December 20,2005 Applicant: Peter Ko (for Sandhill Properties!Whole Foods Market) Owner: Paul & Barbara Weiss Location: 20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 316-31-018, -020 APPLICATION SUMMARIES: USE PERMIT to demolish structures associated with a former car dealership and construct a new 68,214 square foot one-story market with mezzanine level. ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL for a new 68,214 square foot one-story market with mezzanine level. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend the granting of a negative declaration, file no. EA-2005-16 2. Recommend approving the Use Permit, file no. U-2005-20, based on the model resolution. 3. Recommend approving the Architectural & Site Approval, file no. ASA-2005-18, based on the model resolution. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Site Area: Commercial! Office! Residential P (Heart of the City) 5.68 acre Building Square Footage to be Demolished: Proposed Building Square Footage: Ground Floor: Mezzanine: Total Building Coverage: Floor to Area Ratio: Maximum Building Height: Actual Building Height: Required Parking: Store: Bar Seating: Café Seating: Provided Parking: Hours of Operation: 30,981 square feet (car dealership) 63,894 square feet 4,320 square feet 68,214 square feet 25.8% 27.6% 36 feet varies-35 feet maximum 68,214 sq. ft.j250 sq. ft.jparking stall = 22 seats!3 seats! parking stall = 100 seats!4 seats! parking stall= (exempt, see Exhibit A) 376 stalls 281 stalls 272.9 stalls 7.3 stalls 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 1<Q-IC\ U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 Page no. 2 Projected Total Employees: 400 Projected Employees (at one time): 100 -125 Environmental Assessment: Mitigated Negative Declaration December 20, 2005 BACKGROUND: The applicant, Peter Ko, is requesting a use permit and architectural & site approval to demolish a former car dealership and construct a 68,214 square foot grocery store with café. The 5.68 property consists of two parcels located near the northeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road. The property is surrounded by a church/ daycare to the north, an office building to the east, small commercial buildings and a church to the south, and a gasoline service station and the City Sports Center to the west. De Anza College is located diagonally away at the southwest corner of Stelling Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard. DISCUSSION: Site Layout. The proposed building is situated on the eastern quarter of the property facing Stelling Road. There is one main north/ south driveway aisle that opens on Stevens Creek Blvd. The other driveway aisles run predominantly east/west and open on Stelling Road in two locations. There are two public entries - one on the southern third of the front elevation and the main entry on the northern third. The main public exit is centered between the entrances. Along the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage, a café will be located at the corner of the building near the main driveway with a semi-circular outdoor eating area. The employee/ administration mezzanine level will have a balcony opening on the boulevard. A multi-aisle sunken loading dock is located at the northern end of the building at the rear of the property. The dock is completely enclosed and fitted with roll-up doors. No other buildings are being proposed with this application. Potential future building pads are shown merely to indicate how future redevelopment may integrate with this project. Architecture and Building Materials. The design was reviewed and approved by the City Architect, Larry Cannon. The building will be constructed of concrete masonry blocks with a sand color finish. The public sides of the building, the south and east sides, will be articulated horizontally and vertically and detailed with materials that will give the premises an" organic" look: a stone base, timber posts integrated with sloped metal canopies, slats made from recycled products to decorate roof ends and form cornices of building walls. One of the more interesting features are the timber ì t) - 20 2 U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 Page no. 3 posts at the café, which will have branching struts to evoke the appearance of trees. Unadorned sections of the wall on the public sides will be coated in stucco. Building Side Setback. The commercial building side setback in the Heart of the City Specific Plan calls for a minimum setback of 10 feet or 1/2 the height of the building wall, whichever is greater. The building is appropriately setback except for a 30-foot length of wall that is 28 feet tall and should be setback a minimum of 14 feet, instead of 12 feet. There are a number of design solutions to obtain compliance with the specific plan: 1) increasing the side setback to 14 feet, 2) reducing the height of the building element by two feet, or 3) clipping the wall height by two feet. A condition has been place in the resolution requiring the applicant to provide a design solution to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development that will fix the side setback violation. Landscaping. No significant size trees will be removed with this project and about 130 new trees will be planted. Coastal Redwoods and Madrones will be planted in the setback areas to soften the appearance of the unadorned north and east building elevations. The southerly 40% of the east elevation is proposed not to be planted because of the screening provided by the adjacent office building and a row of mature Coastal Redwoods situated on the adjacent property between the existing office and proposed building. The parking lot will be populated by mainly London Plane trees, which are noted for large canopies and good shading characteristics. The parking lot swales shown on the site plan are there to detain and filter storm waters. Heart of the City landscape improvements will be installed along Stevens Creek Boulevard. A slightly modified version that mimics the street improvements in front of Peets Coffee and Panera Bread will be used of the potential for high pedestrian usage from De Anza College. This includes interlocking stone pavers set in the sidewalk and extending into the front landscape strip, and landscaped wells in lieu of a grassy strip to buffer the pedestrian lane from boulevard vehicular traffic. A series of independent trellises behind the Heart of the City landscape improvements and along the parking lot will visually tie the parking lot into the building. A flowering hedge row is not shown but has been made a condition of approval. Public Art. The recently adopted General Plan provided that such pr.ojects contribute %% of its construction valuation towardspublic art. The applicant has provided a section of the Stevens Creek Boulevard elevation for this public art, below the planned signage. Staff is concerned that this lower area will not be visible enough with the Heart of the City trees in front. Staff is recommending that the public art be placed t ß - 2\ 3 U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 Page no. 4 higher on the building or integrated with the planned signage. A condition has been added to the resolution. Parking and Traffic. Parking. The proposed 68,214 square foot building generates a parking requirement of 273 parking stalls. Added to this is the parking requirement for the bar seating, which is 8 stalls for a total of 281 parking stalls. Incidental food area seating is not charged against the grocery store parking requirement in accordance with Planning Commission resolution no. 4333 (Exhibit A). Even if an additional 25 parking stalls were required for the café seating (100 seats), the 376 stalls more than compensate for any perceived excess parking demand. There is on-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard in front of this property. Some of this parking west and east of the driveway entrance will likely need to be removed to facilitate truck turning movements and possible extended left turn pockets on Stevens Creek Boulevard. Truck Route. Stelling Road is not a truck route. The store operator will need to plan a truck route for deliveries, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, and inform all of its delivery contractors. A condition has been placed in the resolution. General Traffic. A project traffic report has been prepared by Pang Engineers, Inc. and reviewed by Public Works Department staff (Exhibit B). The report was prepared to comply with City transportation level of service (LOS) policies and also Congestion Management Program (CMP) standards. The net peak hour traffic trips (excludes car dealership trips) is 2,929 daily trips with 57 trips during the AM peak hour and 328 trips during the PM peak hour. Looking at the affected signalized intersections for "Existing Traffic," "Background Traffic," and "With Project Traffic" conditions, all studied intersections continue to meet City LOS and CMP LOS standards. The traffic report did identify traffic operational deficiencies at the Stevens Creek and Stelling Road intersection that would be worsen with the Whole Foods project, but not to a point that degraded LOS below City standards. The traffic consultant recommended that the applicant study the possibility of lengthening the left turn pockets on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard and/ or lengthening the left turn pocket on southbound Stelling Road. A condition has been placed in the resolution. In addition to this studý, there appears to be an unused Stelling Road "duck out" lane in front of the subject project and the church to the north. The need for this lane should be evaluated by the applicant and the Public Works Department and modified or incorporated in the project as needed. A condition has been placed in the resolution. IlQ - Z2- 4 U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 Page no. 5 Cut-Through Traffic. Staff is concerned about the potential for project traffic cutting easterly through Alves Drive. This potential cannot be studied until after the project is occupied and traffic patterns have had a chance to normalize. The neighborhood is also involved in the study. Staff is recommending that the applicant pay for this study and set aside funds to construct necessary traffic improvements. Noise. Potential noise sources include truck deliveries and roof equipment noise. Staff feels that disturbances to residential neighbors (Alves Drive) would be unlikely as the nearest residential neighbor is 260 feet away to the north. Loading dock noises will be minimized as the facility will be enclosed. In addition the building is being designed to place the majority of rooftop equipment on the southern portion of the building. Environmental Review. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) reviewed this project on December 14,2005. It recommended a mitigated negative declaration for this project conditioning it with the traffic engineering studies for the left turn pockets and potential neighborhood cut-through traffic previously mentioned by staff. In addition, the ERC recommended a plan for the recycling of demolition materials and the siting of the bicycle racks in a usable location. Enclosures: Model Resolutions Exhibit A: Planning Commission Resolution No. 4333 Exhibit B: Traffic Report prepared by Pang Engineers, Inc. dated 10/28/05 Initial Study and ERC Recommendation Plan Set Submitted by: Colin J ung, Senior Planner C' Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen~"~_ G: CupertinoNT /Planning/PDREPOR T /pcUsereports/2005ureports/U-2005-20.doc I€J- 23 5 U-2005-20 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A FORMER CAR DEALERSHIP AND CONSTRUCT A 68,214 SQUARE FOOT MARKET WITH CAFE AT 20955 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title; and 3) The proposed development is consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolutionare based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2005-20 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of December 20, 2005, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Ie - '24 Resolution No. Page 2 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2005-20 Peter Ko (Sandhill Properties/Whole Foods) 20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "WHOLE FOODS MARKET/20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA 95014" dated 11/10/05 and consisting of 13 sheets labeled ASO.O, ASO.1, AS1.0,AS1.1, AS2.0, AS4.0, AS4.1a,AS4.1b, AS4.2, AS4.3, AS4.4, AS5.0,AS6.0, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION APPROVAL A development allocation of 68,214 square feet of Heart of the City commercial development potential is granted less the existing building area of the car dealership (30,981 square feet). 3. BICYCLE RACK LOCATION Prior to building permit approval, applicant shall identify an adequate location for a bicycle rack. 4. BUILDING DESIGN CHANGES At the building permit stage, the applicant shall revise the southeast corner of the building or change the side setback to conform to Heart of the City Specifi Plan side setback for a commercial building. Design change shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 5. LANDSCAPING CHANGES The applicant shall modify the landscape plan to comply with the Heart of the City landscape standards, including the planting of 36" boxed trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard and the planting of a low profile flowering shrub row at the perimeter of the parking facing Stevens Creek Boulevard. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director concurrent with a building permit application 16-26 Resolution No. Page 3 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 7. PUBLIC ART The Applicant shall contribute %% of the construction valuation toward onsite public art. If the artwork is located on the Stevens Creek Boulevard elevation, it shall be mounted high enough to be visible through the landscape improvements and potentially incorporated with the planned building signage. 8. SIGN AGE Signage is not approved with this use permit application. Signage shall conform to the City Sign Code. Applicant may apply for a sign exception as needed. 9. COVENANT OF RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT The applicant shall record a deed restriction for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easement between the subject property and the abutting corner property at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, to be implemented at such time that the City can require the same of adjacent property owners, subject to approval of the City Attorney. The covenant of easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building occupancy. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 10. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 11. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 12. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. 16-2.(P Resolution No. Page 4 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 13. TRAFFIC SIGNS, DETAILS AND LEGENDS Traffic control signs, details and legends shall be placed at locations specified by the City. All improvement plans shall include all necessary signage, details and legends along with traffic control plans. 14. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 15. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and! or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 16. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 17. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 18. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost $ 5% of On-Site Improvement Cost $1,000.00 $13,180.60 1~-21 Resolution No. Page 5 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: ** N/A N/A Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 19. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 20. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 21. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. 22. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS In addition, the applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and stormwater treahnent BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. The property owners with treahnent BMPs will be required to certify on-going operation and maintenance. 23. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a notice of intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses a preparation of a Storm Water Pollution lB- 2'6 Resolution No. Page 6 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) to c0,ntrol storm water runoff quality and BMP inspection and maintenance. 24. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on-site. Erosion Control notes shall be stated on the plans. 25. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Department. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 26. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to maintain all non-standard items in the City's Right-of-way. 27. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to the City to be approved to the satisfaction of the Traffic Department. 28. WORK SCHEDULE A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable for all grading/ erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 29. FLOOR PLAN FOR STORAGE, SORTING AND PROCESSING OF MATERIALS, TRASH AND RECYCLABLES Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a floor plan providing for adequate storage, sorting and processing of materials, trash and recyclables in the interior of the building. Outside storage of materials, trash and recyclables is prohibited, other than items for retail display, customer outdoor furniture and shopping carts. Plan shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 30. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Applicant shall conduct a traffic engineering study to examine on-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard and the potential extension of the left turn pockets and lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road as described in a traffic report prepared by Pang Engineers Inc. and dated 10/28/05. The utility of the "duck-out" Stelling Road lane fronting the project shall also be evaluated. Work shall be coordinated through and approved by the Public Works Department. Street improvements as needed shall be constructed by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Iß-2q Resolution No. Page 7 U-2005-20 December 20, 2005 31. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR POTENTIAL CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC Applicant shall fund a study to examine potential neighborhood cut-through traffic resulting from the project. Applicant shall pay for necessary traffic improvements to alleviate project neighborhood traffic impacts. Work shall be coordinated through the Public Works Department. 32. PLAN FOR RECYCLE AND/OR REUSE OF DEMOLITION MATERIAL Prior to demolition permit approval, the applicant shall submit a plan for the reuse And recycling of demolition debris. 33. MERGING OF PARCELS Prior to building occupancy, the property owner shall merge the two parcels into one lot. 34. TRUCK ROUTE PLAN The applicant shall develop a truck route plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall ensure that the market and its suppliers abide by the truck route plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Planning Commission G:CupertinojPlanning/PD ReportjRESjU-2005-20 1~-30 ASA-2005-18 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL FOR A 68,214 SQUARE FOOT MARKET AND CAFÉ AT 20955 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2005-18 Peter Ko (Sandhill Properties/Whole Foods Market) 20955 Stevens Creek Blvd., APN 326-31-018 & -020 SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. The proposal will use materials and design elements that compliment neighboring structures; and 4. The proposal is consistent with the standards and design guidelines of the Heart of the City Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval, File No. ASA- 2005-18, is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and ItJ- 3\ Resolution No. Page 2 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this *esolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2005- 18 set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of December 20, 2005, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits titled: "WHOLE FOODS MARKET/20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA 95014" dated 11/10/05 and consisting of 13 sheets labeled ASO.O, ASO.l, ASl.0,ASl.1, AS2.0, AS4.0, AS4.1a,AS4.1b, AS4.2, AS4.3, AS4.4, AS5.0,AS6.0, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION APPROVAL A development al1ocation of 68,214 square feet of Heart of the City commercial development potential is granted less the existing building area of the car dealership (30,981 square feet). 3. BICYCLE RACK LOCATION Prior to building permit approval, applicant shal1 identify an adequate location for a bicycle rack. 4. BUILDING DESIGN CHANGES At the building permit stage, the applicant shal1 revise the southeast corner of the building or change the side setback to conform to Heart of the City Specifi Plan side setback for a commercial building. Design change shal1 be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 5. LANDSCAPING CHANGES The applicant shall modify the landscape plan to comply with the Heart of the City landscape standards, including the planting of 36" boxed trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard and the planting of a low profile flowering shrub row at the perimeter of the parking facing Stevens Creek Boulevard. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director concurrent with a building permit application. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Iß-32 Resolution No. Page 3 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 7. PUBLIC ART The Applicant shall contribute %% of the construction valuation toward onsite public art. If the artwork is located on the Stevens Creek Boulevard elevation, it shall be mounted high enough to be visible through the landscape improvements and potentially incorporated with the planned building signage. 8. SIGNAGE Signage is not approved with this use permit application. Signage shall conform to the City Sign Code. Applicant may apply for a sign exception as needed. 9. COVENANT OF RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT The applicant shall record a deed restriction for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easement between the subject property and the abutting corner property at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, to be implemented at such time that the City can require the same of adjacent property owners, subject to approval of the City Attorney.' The covenant of easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building occupancy. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 10. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 11. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 12. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. 13. TRAFFIC SIGNS, DETAILS AND LEGENDS Traffic control signs, details and legends shall be placed at locations specified by the City. All improvement plans shall include all necessary signage, details and legends along with traffic control plans. 14. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 1~-33 Resolution No. Page 4 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 15. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in ~ccordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 16. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 17. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 18. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost $ 5% of On-Site Improvement Cost $1,000.00 $ 13,180.60 ** N/A N/A Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 15-34 Resolution No. Page 5 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 19. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 20. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 21. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. . 22. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REOUlREMENTS In addition, the applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and stormwater treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. The property owners with treatment BMPs will be required to certify on-going operation and maintenance. 23. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a notice of intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses a preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) to control storm water runoff quality and BMP inspection and maintenance. 24. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on-site. Erosion Control notes shall be stated on the plans. 25. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Department. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 26. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to maintain all non-standard items in the City's Right-of-way. l6-35 Resolution No. Page 6 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 27. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to the Çity to be approved to the satisfaction of the Traffic Department. 28. WORK SCHEDULE A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable for all grading/ erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 29. FLOOR PLAN FOR STORAGE, SORTING AND PROCESSING OF MATERIALS, TRASH AND RECYCLABLES Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a floor plan providing for adequate storage, sorting and processing of materials, trash and recyclables in the interior of the building. Outside storage of materials, trash and recyclables is prohibited, other than items for retail display, customer outdoor furniture and shopping carts. Plan shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 30. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Applicant shall conduct a traffic engineering study to examine on-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard and the potential extension of the left turn pockets and lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road as described in a traffic report prepared by Pang Engineers Inc. and dated 10/28/05. The utility of the "duck-out" Stelling Road lane fronting the project shall also be evaluated. Work shall be coordinated through and approved by the Public Works Department. Street improvements as needed shall be constructed by the applicant to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 31. TRAFFIC STUDY FOR POTENTIAL CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC Applicant shall fund a study to examine potential neighborhood cut-through traffic resulting from the project. Applicant shall pay for necessary traffic improvements to alleviate project neighborhood traffic impacts. Work shall be coordinated through the Public Works Department. 32. PLAN FOR RECYCLE AND/OR REUSE OF DEMOLITION MATERIAL Prior to demolition permit approval, the applicant shall submit a plan for the reuse And recycling of demolition debris. 33. MERGING OF PARCELS Prior to building occupancy, the property owner shall merge the two parcels into one lot. 34. TRUCK ROUTE PLAN The applicant shall develop a truck route plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall ensure that the market and its suppliers abide by the truck route plan. \6--3(¡i Resolution No. Page 7 ASA-2005-18 December 20, 2005 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Planning Commission G:CupertinojPlanning/P D ReportjRES/ ASA -2005-18 l~-3l CITY OF CUPER INC 10300 Torre Avenue cupertino, California 95014 EXHIBIT A RESOWTION NO. 4333 OF THE PlANNING CüMKISSION OF THE . CITY OF CUPERI'INO INI'ERPREI'ING THE INCIDENTAL PROVISION OF INOOOR FOOD SERVICE AREA SEATING AS A PERMI'ITED USE IN A REI'AIL GROCERY OUI'LEI' UNDER DEFINED CIRCUMSTANCES 'Ihe Dirèctor of community Development may allow indoor seating without securing a Use Permtit for consumption of food items purchased on the premises of a retail gr=ery outlet when the following guidelines are met: 1) Availability of the seating area cannot be advertised, and table side waiter/waitress service may not be offered. 2) Food items for on premises consumption must be purchased at the· regular checkout counter. (Exception: If the food item is purchased at an in-store deli =unter or swlar sales area which is under the same management control as that of the main sales floor, it may then be purchased at a satellite cash register.) 3) Hours of availability for the seating area =incide with hours of operation for the gr=ery sales floor. 4) Management of the seating area remains the responsibility of the grocery operator including removal of litter. 5) 'Ihe existing parking space inventory for the grocery outlet site is consistent with city ordinance requirements at the time the seating area is installed. 6) the ability to provide incidental food service seating does not apply to "convenience markets" as defined in Section 4.2 of ordinance 1344. 7) total seating does not exceed a ratio of one (1) seat for every 500 s.f. of gross floor area. 8) no al=holic beverages will be =nsumed in the seating area. 'Ihe Director of Conununity Development may still require an application for a Use Permit in any specific case to address explicit matters of community concern, even when it appears that the above-stated =iteria can be met. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of March, 1991 at a Regular Meeting of the Plarming commission of the city of cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSI'AIN : ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS : COMMISSIONERS : COMMISSIONERS : COMMISSIONERS : Austin, Mahoney, Fazekas, QJnnn. Mackenzie None None Mann ATI'FSI': APPROVED : /s/ Mark Cauqhey Mark Caughey city Plarmer Isl Donald Mackenzie Donald Mackenzie, Chairman cupertino Planning Commission \pcresos\reso1344 lB-Ó1() EXHIBIT B TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT WHOLE FOODS MARKET NORTHEAST QUADRANT STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD AND STELLING ROAD CITY OF CUPERTINO October 28, 2005 By PANG ENGINEERS, INC. Traffic and Transportation Consultants P.O. Box 4255 Mountain View, CA 94040 I'Ó-oq TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................i, ii TABLE IT SUMMARY - LEVEL OF SERVICE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ..................................................iii I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................1 II. SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................1 III. TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................4 A. Trip Generation.............. .............. ..... ................................... ....................... 4 B. Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................... 7 C. Level of Service ........................................................................................ 11 D. Operational Deficiencies.......................................................·..·..·.............15 E. Access and Circulation.................................................·..........·................. 19 F. Public Transit ............................................................................................ 20 G. Bicycle Routes.............................................·........·..·..···..·....·...................23 IV. IMPROVEMENTS .........................................................................................23 V. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 25 APPENDIX Site Plan Intersection Counts Approved Trips Inventory Level of Seryice Descriptions Level of Service Calculations Street Improvements \~p'\{) PLATE 1 PLATE 2 PLATE 3A, 3B PLATE 4 PLATE 5 TABLE I TABLE II LIST OF PLATES Page VICINITY MAP........................................... ................. 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION.................................. ...... .......... 8 TRIP ASSIGNMENT PM PEAK HOUR.............................................··..·· ....... 9, 10 BUS ROUTES..............................................········..·· ..... 22 BICYCLE ROUTES...............................................··· ...... 24 LIST OF TABLES Page TRIP GENERATION.........................................········..· 5,6 SUMMARY LEVEL OF SERVICE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS.................................... 14 l tb - 41 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SANDHILL PROPERTY COMPANY proposes to develop a Whole Foods Market on the northeasterly quadrant of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road on the former Anderson Chevrolet dealership site. This project expects to generate about 4,171 daily trips, with 133 AM peak hour trips and 426 PM peak hour trips. The existing land use on the site has a trip credit of 1,242 daily trips, 76 AM peak hour and 98 PM peak hour trips. The net total trips expected are 2,929 daily trips and 57 AM and 328 PM peak hour trips. Seven intersections were analyzed for traffic impacts from the proposed project for the PM peak hour with the Highway Capacity Manual delay methodology for signalized intersections. The AM peak hour was not analyzed since the expected net project trips will not exceed the 100 trip peak hour threshold. Six intersections are along Stevens Creek Boulevard at State Route 85 southbound ramp CW) and State Route 85 northbound ramp (E), Mary Avenue, Stelling Road, Saich Way and De Anza Boulevard. The seventh intersection is at Stelling Road and Greenleaf Drive. The Stevens Creek Boulevard at SR-85 SB ramp (W) and NB ramp (E) intersections, and at Stelling Road and at De Anza Boulevard are Congestion Management Program intersections. The three City of Cupertino signalized intersections will operate at a "D" or better level of service for the "Existing", "Existing + Approved Projects" or "Background", and "With Project" . conditions. These results satisfy the City of Cupertino's level of service policy of a "D" or better LOS. The four CMP intersections will operate with a "D" or better level of service for the "Existing", "Existing + Approved Projects" or "Background", and "With r'!~E~I~E~S J.~ ~=.. n TR PO ATI :óN~ ~ \ß-42. Project" conditions,and satisfies the CMP threshold requirements of an "E" or' better LOS. The suggested street improvemeIlts,areto wÏ(ierqhel10rth sid~ofStey¢ns" Creçk .:' .' '-~.._-,>,.', -- ',.- '.', '_"-~" ,"-.', ,', ,.,.-.'._..;-:.',....~.'--.- ..-..:-:--:."".'.-.:,,-.. '.,'.'. '-:--"""'-"-"-'-::.'j' Boulevard to City of Cupertin() standards. The intent is to improve operational 4efic¡çl1~ies al0l1g Stevens Crêek Boulevard by providing an increased length for the westbound left turn lane. The traffic analysis report concludes that there is adequate capacity in the existing transportation system to develop the entire project as proposed. ii Q~~c¡¡;~~~~~,JtL~ l'ß- 43 TABLED SUMMARY LEVEL OF SERVICE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS * EXISTING(l) BACKGROUND(2) WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION Count Intersect'o Intersect'o lntersect'n Date Delay'" LOS V/C") Delay()) LOS V/C") Delay()) LOS V/C") (seclveh) (seclveh) (seclveh) 1. SR85 W Ramps I Stevens Creek Boulevard pM 9/29/04 27.1 C 0.728 27.4 C 0.735 27.7 C 0.742 2. SR85 E Ramps I Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 9/28104 35.1 D+ 0.731 35.2 D+ 0.736 35.5 D+ 0.748 3. Mary I Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 10/6/05 34.3 C- 0.656 34.2 C- 0.664 36.0 D+ 0.677 4. Stevens Creek Blvd I Stelling Road PM 10121/04 48.8 D 0.8t4 48.9 D 0.829 52.5 D- 0.876 With Improvements: Alternative 1 51.4 D- 0.876 Alternative 2 50.0 D 0.849 Alternative 3 49.1 D 0.849 5. Saich Way I Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 10/6/05 18.7 B- 0.543 18.6 B- 0.547 18.4 B- 0.553 6. De Anza Blvd.! S levens Creek Boulevard PM 10121/04 41.3 D 0.796 42.0 D 0.809 42.3 D 0.819 7. Greenleaf I Stelling Road PM 10/6/05 187.3 F 1.100 WICIP 10/6/05 22.7 C+ 0.673 22.7 C+ 0.673 23.2 C 0.689 16 * * 1 ~ v * 1~- Footnotes: LOS ; Level of Service * Congestion Management Program (CMP) Intersection (I) Existing; represents lane configuration for "Background" and "With Project" conditions (2) Existing + Approved Projects; "Background Traffic" condition. (3) Intersection delay; average delay for the whole intersection (4) V/C; critical volume I capacity ratio LOS calculations with TRAFFIX per Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program Guidelines. ~£.~~,;J!1"~¥J~~~~~,m~~ IB-+'\ #0512 10/24/05 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT I. INTRODUCTION SANDHILL PROPERTY COMPANY proposes to develop a Whole Foods Market on the northeasterly quadrant of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road on the former Anderson Chevrolet dealership. The objective of this report is to analyze the existing and future traffic conditions, provide an estimate of traffic generation for the project, assign and distribute the trips to critical intersections, and suggest possible street improvements and / or mitigation measures if required. II. SITE CONDITIONS The subject property was recently vacated by an automobile dealership with approximately 37,250 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). Stevens Creek . Boulevard is a 6 lane major east-west arterial street with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). Stelling Road is a major north-south 4 lane street south of Stevens Creek Boulevard with a posted speed of 35 mph. Stelling Road north of Stevens Creek Boulevard narrows down from 4 to 2 lanes north of the project site with a posted speed of 30 mph. State Route 85 is a 6 lane freeway with 2 of the lanes operating as High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes, and with a posted speed of 65 mph. 1-280 is an 81ane freeway with 2 of the lanes operating as HOV lanes, and with a posted speed of 65 mph. Mary Avenue is a two lane north-south street. Saich Way 1 Iß-45 is a 2 lane north-south street. De Anza Boulevard is a 6 to 8 lane north-south major arterial street south of Stevens Creek Boulevard, and an 8 lane street north of Stevens Creek Boulevard, with a posted speed of 40 mph. The site is bounded on the south by Stevens Creek Boulevard and southerly thereof with commercial retail uses such as Panda Express, T-Mobile, Starbucks, J&J Hawaiian BBQ, etc. Southwest of the project site is De Anza College. Westerly of the project site is Stelling Road and the Cupertino Sports Center. To the north is the N.C. Abundant Church and single family residences. To the east are office buildings ego Stevens Creek Office Center (Plate 1). 2 1~-4(o Greenleaf Stevens PLATE 1 VICINITY MAP #051' 10-5-05 -0 oc 0> C Q) .... (f) z 8 Dr. >. ~ \- o § -0 C o Rd. ~ -.- I -0 ~ ID Blvd. . o N C 4: Q) o 1æI~q.E~Wi lß··41 III. TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS A. Trip Generation The Whole Foods Market is planned for a maximum of 68,000 square feet.(l) The project is expected to generate about 4,171 trips per day. During the AM peak hour, 133 trips will occur with 81 inbound and 52 outbound. For the PM peak hour, 426 trips are expected with 217 inbound and 209 outbound. The "existing" land use on the site is an automobile dealership with about 37,250 square, and has a trip credit of 1,242 daily trips, 76: ~~\¡:~. :Sr-~I\~o~r~f~ls~ k" i:~'('il . (. 'The net total tiipsexpecttid iSthùs2;929dailytrip~: During the AM peak hour, about 57 trips are expected with 25 inbound and 32 outbound. The AM peak hour is not evaluated since the 100 peak hour trip threshold is not satisfied.(2) For the PM peak hour, about 328 trips are expected with 179 inbound and 149 outbound (Table I). The PM peak hour is evaluated for the "worst case" condition. (I) The preliminary site plan shows 67,542 square feet, early October, 2005. (2) Ref. : City of Cupertino, Public Works Department and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Guidelines. 4 Iß-45 Table I TRIP GENERATION LAND USE UNIT TRIP DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR RATE TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS IN OUT IN OUT PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Supermarket (I) (2) 68,000 61.344 4171 61% 39% 51% 49% sq. ft. (a) AM .......... 1.95 (b) .......... 81 52 133 PM .......... 6.27 (b) .......... .......... .......... 217 209 426 TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT: DAILY 4171 AM .......... .......... .......... 81 52 133 PM .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 217 209 426 Page 1 of2 10-5-05 #0512 ~t~,,~,;~~~~Æi'1!~,HiÇA (5-4'1 Table I TRIP GENERATION (continued.. .) LAND USE UNIT TRIP DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR RATE TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS IN OUT IN OUT EXISTING LAND USE (CREDITS): 1. Automobile Dealership 37,250 33.34 (a) 1242 74% 26% 39% 61% sq.ft. AM . . . . . . . . . . 2.05(b) .......... 56 20 76 PM .......... 2.64 (b) .......... .......... .......... 38 60 98 NET PROJECT: DAILY 2929 AM .......... .......... .......... 25 32 57 PM .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 179 149 328 AM = Morning Peak Hour PM = Evening Peak Hour sq.ft. = square feet Ref.: (I) Institute of Transportation Engineers, "Trip Generation", Seventh Edition, 2003 (2) San Diego Association of Governments, "Traffic Generators", April, 2002 (with 40% Passby Trips) (a) Per 1,000 square feet per day (b) Per 1,000 square feet per peak hour Page 2 of2 10-5-05 #0512 Q~Cj,~J1ffi¡:j"J.~~~l~ lß - 50 B. Trip Distribution and Assignment The trips are distributed and assigned based on existing traffic volumes, and other projects in the proximity of this development. The trip distribution is shown below and on Plate 2. A summary of the trip distribution is as follows: 1. North (35%) State Route 85 10% Stelling Road 15% De Anza Boulevard 10% 2. West (15%) Stevens Creek Boulevard 15% 3. East (5%) Stevens Creek Boulevard 5% 4. South (45%) State Route 85 10% Stelling Road 20% De Anza Boulevard 15% TOTAL 100% The trips are more specifically assigned on Plates 3A and 3B for the PM peak hours. 7 15-51 Stevens 15% ~ ~ -.- t ~1 -0 a::: 7 Dr. Greenleaf 21 ~ -0 > ã:i Blvd. Ä 0' C ã> +' (f) Z o N C « Q) o c Rd. PLA TE 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ~1 ~1 LEGEND: o Critical Intersections * CMP Intersection iI~<£..E~1~W.s 10512 1O-~05 1~-~2 22~ stevens 27~ <D ~ ~ ~ l~ 1 ! -.- 1 I 85 8 Greenleaf Dr. ro 10 ~ ~ 1 1 >. 3 'U £ CD Blvd. ~ 9 ~8 ~ to 10 <D 1 1 o N C « Q) o McClellan 22 L 1-27 1 1 Rd. O<D t0t0 ~r- ~~ LEGEND: 11 o Critical Intersections * CMP Intersection PLATE 3A TRIP ASSIGNMENT PM PEAK HOUR m~æp""E.!IG~œSJ.~.s; ""2 10-5-05 iß-53 CD ~ w ~ æ ::E '" 0 (1) -22 " ~ " ::>J ~ ;;:: 18 ~ ;-i L15 0 L ::>J ,15 ::>J co -< 0 co 0 -52 3 01 3 01 -37 ~ " " ~ ~ !" Stevens Creek Blvd. 45- stevens Creek Blvd. Stevens Creek Blvd. 27- r 63- 18 @ \at Alves © ® 0 (1) 22 VI -52 ~ ~ VI 18 ~ 0 N I 26 5' ,30 õ' 0 _9 U '" ;T -27 -1 CD ::>J c:;: 23 ::E :;: ?- 0 ?- '< Stevens Creek Blvd. Stevens Creek Blvd. 1s---J Stevens Creek Blvd. 63 --1 23- I 8- 63 ø LEGEND VI CD ~ Intersection Number 26 ~ PLATE 38 \ ~. ::>J ~ ?- TRIP ASSIGNMENT Greenleaf Dr. I \ 1 PM PEAK HOUR \ 22 I;~G...ENG1NEERS. I~,S¡ "0512 ß-:A C. Level of Service A maximum of seven signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project site were selected by the City of Cupertino's Department of Public Works for level of service analyses for the PM peak hour. The intersections were evaluated with the TRAFFIX{l) software program for several conditions: 1. Existing (year 2004/2005); . 2. Existing + Approved Projects ("Background Traffic"); 3. "Background Traffic" + Project ("With Project"). A Congestion Management Program analysis was performed at four of the seven signalized critical intersections, namely Stevens Creek Boulevard at State Route 85 southbound ramp (W), State Route 85 northbound ramp (E), Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard, for the above three conditions. A fourth condition "Cumulative" or "With Growth" which represents the near term growth of traffic, was also considered. The "Existing" calculations and list of approved and pending projects were supplied by the City of Cupertino. The approved projects were reviewed and consist of the following projects in proximity to the project site: I. Cupertino City Center with 205 apartments, 7,000 square feet retail, and a hotel with 217 units. (2) (l) Traffic Impact Analysis Software, Dowling Associates, Inc. (2) The approved trips inventory (A TI) was reviewed and where discrepancies were found, the higher volumes were used to denote a "worst case" condition. 11 Iß-55 The pending projects list were reviewed and there were no projects in the proximity of the project site that were significant in nature. All of the above approved and pending projects were reviewed and the PM peak hour trips assigned to the critical intersections. The critical volume to capacity (V IC) ratios, average delay and level of service (LOS) were calculated based on the Highway Capacity Manual Delay Methodology for signalized intersections. The City of Cupertino's Transportation Policy requires a minimum standard LOS of "D". A significant impact is defined as the proposed project causes the LOS to deteriorate from LOS "D" or better under the "Background" condition to the unacceptable "E" or "F" - LOS. For intersections operating at the unacceptable "E" or "F" _ LOS under the "Background" condition, a significant impact is defined as the proposed project causes: 1. an increase in critical delay value of 4.0 or more seconds, AND 2. an increase in the critical VIC ratio of 0.010 or more. Six of the seven intersections are assumed to operate with the existing lane patterns and signal timing. For the Stelling Road I Greenleaf Drive intersection, the City of Cupertino has in progress a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to convert the shared left-thru-right movements along Stelling Raod to a separate left, and a shared thru-right lane pattern. Additionally, the traffic signal and its operations will be modified e.g., an increase in the cycle length from 60 to 90 seconds. These CIP improvements are considered as part of the "Existing", "Background" and "With Project" conditions. 12 lß-ôtt> , A summary of the LOS results are contained on Table II. For the "With Project" condition, the three City of Cupertino signalized intersections at Stevens Creek Boulevard / Mary Avenue, Stevens Creek Boulevard / Saich Way and Stelling Road / Greenleaf Drive will operate with a "D" or better LOS for the "Existing", "Existing+Approved Projects" or "Background", and "With Project" conditions (Table II). For the four CMP intersections, namely Stevens Creek Boulevard / State Route 85 SB ramp (W), and Stevens Creek Boulevard / State Route 85 NB ramp (E), Stevens Creek Boulevard / Stelling Road, and Stevens Creek Boulevard / De Anza Boulevard, the significance criteria is defined differently. The minimum standard is an "E" - LOS. A significant impact is defined as the deterioration from LOS "E" or better under the "Background" condition to the unacceptable "F" LOS. For intersections operating at the unacceptable "F" - LOS under the "Background" condition, a significant impact is defined as the proposed project causes: 1. an increase in critical delay value of 4.0 or more seconds, AND 2. an increase in the critical V/C ratio of 0.010 or more. A summary of the CMP - LOS results are also contained on Table II. For the "Existing", "Existing+Approved Projects" or "Background" and "With Project" conditions, the four CMP intersections will operate with a "D" or better LOS. lß-Sl 13 TABLE II SUMMARY LEVEL OF SERVICE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS * EXISTING(l) BACKGROUND(2) WIlli PROJECT INTERSECTION Count Intersect' n Intersect'n Intersect'n Date Delay(3) LOS V/C(4) De1ay<3) LOS V/C(4) DelalJ) LOS V/C(4) (sec!veh) (sec!veh) (sec!veh) I. SR85 W Ramps / Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 9/29/04 27.1 C 0.728 27.4 C 0.735 27.7 C 0.742 2. SR85 E Ramps I Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 9/28104 35.1 D+ 0.731 35.2 D+ 0.736 35.5 D+ 0.748 3. Mary I Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 10/6/05 34.3 C- 0.656 34.2 C- 0.664 36.0 D+ 0.677 4. Stevens Creek Blvd . I Stelliog Road PM 10/21/04 48.8 D 0.814 48.9 D 0.829 52.5 D- 0.876 With Improvements: Alternative I 51.4 D- 0.876 Alternative 2 50.0 D 0.849 Alternative 3 49.1 D 0.849 5. Saich Way / Stevens Creek Boulevard . PM 10/6/05 18.7 B- 0.543 18.6 B- 0.547 18.4 B- 0.553 6. De Anza Blvd.! Stevens Creek Boulevard PM 10121/04 41.3 D 0.796 42.0 D 0.809 42.3 D 0.819 7. Greenleaf I Stelling Road PM 10/6105 187.3 F 1.100 WICIP 10/6105 22.7 C+ 0.673 22.7 C+ 0.673 23.2 C 0.689 * * * Footnotes: LOS ; Level of Service * Congestion Management Program (CMP) Intersection (I) Existing; represents lane configuration for "Background" and "With Project" conditions (2) Existing + Approved Projects; "Background Traffic" condition. (3) Intersection delay; average delay for the whole intersection (4) V/C; critical volume I capacity ratio LOS calculations with TRAFFIX per Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program Guidelines. #0512 10/24/05 Q~~n~J19!~Æi~~~,Ht~! Iß-5~ A detailed freeway analyses was not performed for the project. By observation, the capacity on SR-85, which contains two mixed flow and one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction has a capacity of approximately 5500 [(2x2200)+(1xI100)]. The maximum directional peak hour project trips expected on SR-85 for example is 18. This represents 0.33% (18/5500) or less than 1% of the directional freeway capacity. 'Î'1i1.Í~:JÞ.~(~is',j~;;'fr6~W~y>T;rtp~hfrÒm'this " ~[pr9ject. ..Thus,. theana~ysis indicates that thec,¡tY of Cupertino's' LOS. policy is satisfied ., . '. 'J" 'è'.~-· :: ". - "_'<'::', -".: -,- - ,'_..' ,.-" with no significant traffic impacts, and that the CMP's LOS p()licy is also satisfi\?d. ·D.', . OPERATIONAL DEFICIENCIES . ,,' ':"'\:/"/-i-.?~·.'\.~:~·_- ".', "':,;- ">:.,<: "};;:'_>',\~ ',:::'i\:', -, .;;-,' '," _~.y"..:. .;c, The Stevens Creek Boulevard / Stelling Road critical intersection operates with a LOS of "D" and "D-" for the "Background" and "With Project" conditions respectively for the PM peak hour. WWlfith,~::!ijt~t!l!J(;t¡g1;L~a.-t¡*(i!J§th'?)¡R:;or.) ~'. -'--'-"--'~-'~"---'-~~"'--":""':',;::~:;,_.:.'- ',- ....- ,.,','- .,-', -,',:,', 'b~tfe¡.I..º$:'thÍ:eshQlli;the··ieftàn(f¡.¡glÎt. tum'.vòi¡f;riis'år¡;·(¡¡J!¡e(Þ.igh"'Iii'an,í . attt:n1Ptt8.JmPf9Y,~)h~<Jp,\}~¡lti()l1s, Ilt th,i~itlter§,ect¡on; thè.Jeftarid right .turn! storage lengths may be co¡nparedwith the.actualqemandrequirements... ,..__:,..,;,."~'~ ,·::V~,:~:.,~F~.(;..,:'::~'--,·.::::;_~_~,;,.,':".",,:,:,::;:-;'_~_,:~':"":'/_::~:-';~"'-"':.'¡"":':':_<;:-':_'-"", -' - - "" -"'" " 15 lð- 5q Stevens Creek Boulevard Westbound Eastbound Remarks Volume Storage (ft) Volume Storage (ft) -a -a -a -a § - § - <= - ¡:: - u u " u " u 0 " bl) 0 " 0 " bl) ~ " .... "5' .S b'o "5' b'o "5' ¡:: .= bl) .'" ~ -"d .... - -"d ~ -"d .... -"d ~ OJ ~ OJ ~ .;< ~ ~ .~ ~ K µ:¡ ¡.Q µ:¡ µ:¡ ¡.Q µ:¡ Left 563 616 200 260* 280* 310 373 250 320* 380* * Turn (2 (2 (2 Deficiency each) each) each) Right 208 208 0 0 0 273 273 0 I 0 0 No existing Turn separate right turn lane. Stelling Road Northbound Southbound Remarks V olurne Storage (ft) Volume Storage (ft) -a -a -a -a ¡:: - ¡:: - <= - § - " u i5 u i5 u u ~ " bl) " " bl) 0 " "5' ¡:: b'o '0' b'o '0' ¡:: ~ "5' -"d .... .'" .><i .... -"d .... .", ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ OJ ~ .;< ~ ~ .~ U K '" µ:¡ ¡.Q µ:¡ µ:¡ ¡.Q µ:¡ Left 219 219 320 240 240 276 302 210 280* 320* * Turn Deficiency Right 249 249 0 0 0 271 271 0 0 0 No existing Turn separate right turn lane. 16 l ß - (QO The Stevens Creek Boulevard double westbound left turn lanes have a demand of 260 feet(l) for each lane or 520 feet for the "Background" condition, and 280 feet for each lane or 560 feet for the "With. Project" condition. This may be compared to about 200 feet for each of 2 lanes or 400 feet total for the "Existing" condition. While there is a current deficiency of 60 feet per lane or 120 feet, the project will add another 20 feet per lane or 40 feet deficiency. Thus, the total left turn lane length should be increased by 160 feet. Since the median island cannot be relocated due to existing poles and overhead lines, the 160 feet may be added only with the extension of the outside left turn lane. With the existing on-street parking in front of the project site recommended for removal, a restriping and I or widening plan for Stevens Creek Boulevard in the westbound direction is suggested. A preliminary pre-design sketch of potential improvements is shown in the Appendix. It appears that about a 3 foot pavement widening to the north on Stevens Creek Boulevard will be required to implement the increased dual westbound left turn lane requirements at the Stevens Creek Boulevard I Stelling Road intersection. The outside left turn lane will be lengthened with the proposed improvements. With this suggested improvement, the LOS will remain the same, with the left turns operating more efficiently. Similarly, the Stevens Creek Boulevard eastbound left turn lane has a demand of 320 feet for the "Background", and 380 feet for the "With Project" condition. The existing left turn storage is 250 feet. Thus, there is a current deficiency of 70 feet and a future deficiency of an additional 60 feet. The 130 feet total deficiency can only be accommodated with a second left turn lane. With the median island fixed in place due to the existing poles and overhead lines, a second left turn lane is impractical. A suggestion (Alternate 1) would be to restripe the eastbound lanes along Stevens Creek Boulevard so that the outside travel lane is 11 feet with a 9 foot wide bike lane. The wide bike lane would operate as a separate right turn (I) Assumes 20 feet per vehicle including headways, and a poisson distribution for which 95% of the time "X" or fewer vehicles will arrive. 17 [6-01 lane. The existing traffic signal inductor loops may require relocation to "center" within the restriped lanes. While the eastbound left turn lane storage deficiency is not directly addressed, the inclusion of a separate eastbound right turn lane would improve the intersections' average delay from 52.5 to 51.4 seconds with the LOS remaining at D-. The Stelling Road southbound left turn lane has a demand of 280 feet for the "Background" and 320 feet for the "With Project" condition. The existing left turn lane is about 210 feet. Thus, there is a current deficiency of 70 feet and a future deficiency of another 40 feet. The 110 feet total deficiency may be accomplished by lengthening the existing left turn lane. However, the existing median landscaping would be removed and there could be a conflict with the northbound left turn lane at Alves Drive. A suggestion (Alternate 2) would be to widen Stelling Road southbound by about 2 feet to create an outside 9 foot wide bike lane. The wide bike lane would operate as a separate right turn lane. This suggested improvement may require traffic signal poles to be relocated. Again, while the southbound left turn lane storage deficiency is not directly addressed, the inclusion of a separate right turn lane would improve the intersections' average delay from 52.5 to 50.0 seconds with the LOS slightly improved from D- toD. Combining Alternate I and Alternate 2 would create Alternate 3. With both of these suggested improvements, the intersections' average delay would be improved from 52.5 to 49.1 seconds, and the LOS from D- to D. The above three alternatives are suggested operational and street improvements, and include the widening along the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard and restriping to create sufficient westbound left turn storage capacity. All of these suggestions are operational improvements which if implemented, would fIÙnimize 18 I ß~ (s;2- the operational deficiencies at the Stevens Creek Boulevard I Stelling Road intersection, and along Stevens Creek Boulevard itself. E. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Vehicular access to and from the project site is planned with two new driveways along Stelling Road to replace the existing two driveways, and one new driveway on Stevens Creek Boulevard to replace the three existing driveways. The two driveways on Stelling Road are primarily for automobiles. The one driveway on Stevens Creek Boulevard is planned for both automobiles and large delivery trucks. The intent is for the large delivery trucks to enter only from Stevens Creek Boulevard with a right turn and travel northerly in front of the Whole Foods Market, then turn left and back in to the truck dock. 'Ì'hi:Úi,if.fsimpeiative/ th~t.·th~...ex.isHng· 09:$.¥ee.$~~~!~f:~m~.;!~gg..g!!f~lM~}ffiigll.~'gW;lþ~j!lº~~;ii,ª~9r;: St~vens ÇreekBoulevard. be remove.4..$qJ~p,r()y'e."eJ:1iculaxacs,,~s1~f The trucks would unload and then exit either to Stevens Creek Boulevard or Stelling Road. If the egress is on Stelling Road, the trucks must turn north where there is no apparent left turn lane available to accommodate U-turns and the trucks would enter into a residential area. Stelling Road is not a current designated truck route. (1) If the trucks enter on the northerly driveway on Stelling Road, there could be a truck turning issue both off-site and on site. Perhaps the trucks would back in from Stelling Road and create vehicular conflicts on Stelling Road itself. Additionally, trucks backing in on the long east-west aisle to the truck dock could create on-site vehicular conflicts.¡'¡:þU$·í';truck;.acçess..~~e¡rt,¡µ!)~.,¡fu.i~s!J~Ùiat.l1eeds .;;. :-,<:':::'.~--'r;/;;·:":<':;~\ ::; '--_~:,": ;:;i;":::;:';.:,;., ,,' - ,:,;-:,_ ',-,:, -":/-:-:~ -":',:',:.':: ':»: additional clarification from the applicant (~~fer töthe·Sit~Plañ. iÍ1"th~¡~þpelldix). (1) Ref.: City of Cupertino. Public Works Department 19 15··(03 The street improvements fronting the property along Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road should be constructed to the City of Cupertino standards. Sidewalks should be provided in the border area between the property line and face of curb, and existing driveways closed and new driveways constructed. F. PUBLIC TRANSIT The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (SCVTA) supplies bus service on Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road in proximity to the project site. The routes, approximate hours of operation, and headways, are as follows: Routes Stevens Creek Boulevard 23 25 53 Stelling Road 54 55 Hours of Operation (weekday) 5:00 AM to Midnight 6:00 AM to Midnight 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM 7:30 AM to 7:30 PM 6:15 AM to 6:20 PM 6:00 AM to 8:30 PM 8:30 AM to 7:30 PM 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM 20 Headways (minutes) 15 weekdays 15 Saturdays 20 Sundays 30 weekdays 30 Saturdays 60 Sundays 60 weekdays only 30-45 weekdays 60 weekends 20-30 weekdays 30 Saturdays 45 Sundays lß -(e4 The average daily bus loadings (1) as of October, 2005 are as follows: LINE ON OFF TOTAL 1. Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard far side Stelling Road 23 193 86 279 25 55 2. Westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard far side Stelling Road 23 49 152 201 53 3. Northbound Stelling Road near side Stevens Creek Boulevard 25 23 29 52 54 55 4. Northbound Stelling Road far side Stevens Creek Boulevard 53 72 9 81 54 5. Southbound Stelling Road near side Stevens Creek Boulevard 53 0 15 15 54 6. Southbound Stelling Road far side Stevens Creek Boulevard 25 156 61 217 54 55 TOTAL 352 845 493 Refer to Plate 4 for the bus routes. (1) Source: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Service Development Department. 21 I€)- CdS Stevens 5 PLATE 4 BUS ROUTES #0512 10-5-05 æ~ I I 5 2 I I ~ cree:1 I I --Ig> LEGEND ~ -.- I @ BUS ROUTE NUMBER - - BUS ROUTE -- BUS STOPS IiIWf~~NG\rÆ:¡R§a.It!£; l~ -l.olP G. BICYCLE ROUTES The City of Cupertino Bicycle Routes in the vicinity of the project site are shown on Plate 5. " IV. IMPROVEMENTS The following street improvements relate to suggestions to improve access, minimize congestion and enhance the traffic carrying capability of streets in the proximity of the development. Improve to City of Cupertino, Department of Public Works standards, the frontage improvements on Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, including the border area between the face of curb and the property line with a sidewalk, and the closure of existing driveways and construction of new driveways. "( /(l. Restripe westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard from Stelling Road to f¥.' easterly of the project site to provide for increased left turn storage capacity. This improvement may require the widening of Stevens Creek Boulevard by approximately 3 feet. '3. Clarify the truck ingress and egress movements with a clear and concise truck operations plan. 23 Iß-to1 ~ -.- I I I I I~ I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - _-1 ~ifJ- - - - - - - - - - - Stevens Creek I I Blvd. I I I Ig' I 12 (/) I 12 I I I I W1f!:Q I I - - 8ICVCtE ROUTE I I PLA TE 5 BICYCLE ROUTES 1iI~G...E~!.R~~~ '0012 10-5-06 Vó- CQ?J V. CONCLUSIONS The peak period traffic impacts have been evaluated for Whole Foods Market project. Several conclusions may be extracted from this report. They are related to trip generation, circulation and access, and intersection levels of service. 1. This project is expected to generate about 4,171 trips per day, and 133 trips during the AM peak hour, and 426 trips during the PM peak hour. With the trip credit for existing automobile dealership land use, the net total estimate is 2,929 daHy trips and 57 AM peak hour and 328 PM peak hour trips. 2. Three of the City of Cupertino's critical signalized intersections along Stevens Creek Boulevard at Mary Avenue and Saich Way, and at Stelling Road I Greenleaf Drive will operate with a "D" or better level of service for the "Existing", "Background", and "With Projeèt" conditions. Thus, the City of Cupertino's "D" or better LOS policy is satisfied with an insignificant impact. 3. The four CMP critical intersections, namely Stevens Creek Boulevard I State Route 85 SB ramp (W), Stevens Creek Boulevard I State Route 85 NB ramp (E), Stevens Creek Boulevard I Stelling Road, and Stevens Creek I De Anza Boulevard will operate with a "D" or better level of service for the "Existing", "Background" and "With Project" conditions. Thus, the CMP's LOS policy of an "E" or better LOS is satisfied. 25 l5-~ CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 14, 2005 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on December 14, 2005. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 (EA-2005-16) Peter Ko 20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Use Permit to demolish a former car dealership and construct a new 68,214 square foot market and café Architectural & Site Approval to construct a new 68,214 square foot market & cafe FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts with the following mitigations incorporated in the project. 1) Prepare a traffic engineering study to evaluate the feasibility of lengthening the left turn pocket and left turn lane on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard and/ or the left turn pocket on southbound Stelling Road. Fund improvements as needed. 2) Fund a neighborhood cut-through traffic study for the east side of Alves Drive. Fund any necessary traffic improvements. r I e a plan for the recycling and/ or reuse of construction debris. D te ine adequate location for bicycle rack. Ste e PI secki Director of Community Development c:\ Planning \ ERCI Rec\2005 \REC ea200516.doc \~-10 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department I F CUPEIQ1NO [st?ffUseLQ~I)""":]:,iC ",;;,3,.,. -. EA File No. E ft-?:l)()Ç--li:; Case File NO.ù-l.f)DS'""-2 AsA-æc.;--,~ f"ttachments ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Title: 'AJ ktì ~()" Fe-ocÅ c, ~'ÞrW Project Location: 2_B'i::5S- sf,:, ,'þ..,.-,.c; C\<?D \<:. R ì "J... 3?-b- =< \- 0\ R .-07.-0 , J 'f I Project Description: [)c.Q" \"", .r¥'~ ,t ~ ~",.\,Ì;\\ rt hc·n'vp..r (''''of" C\ 2_ C\\Q J"sV, r (J- .' c .,-+-r- ~'. n ,..,.,.. ",. X 2...1 L\- .-;;:;. or:. t: N''' ,. 'fz¡ + .¡,' ;t\;. tl\ <2:z..<'J\.v1 1''-<. &, :t (. '" . M'TJ "'~ ;, .,.¡..- l.p - c-\" rI,. 2 I !'.r. .f+. ,,"\o..<'Þ:t w':tl \ I I '^^€,'Z..-,..". Environmental Setting: "I ZOU",,^-,,-- I"',' ( " .~ ìi\£1 t~T . ð II" . PI,.)/(.) JC evv-J. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) _ .r,,¡"'2, Building Coverage - 2.5.9_°/0 Exist. BUildin!¡1BIs:f. Proposed I ..1.- Bldg. /:,8 ?-Ilt s.f. Zone -_I" G.P. Designation - (..,,,,,,,,,p rL.W ï ()ffie¿/ «.e.s"(C/i2M.ll J Assessor's Parcel No. -3'2.b- 3\ -Q13 -020 ¡ If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type #4 Unit Type #5 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) 0 Monta Vista Design Guidelines 0 S. De Anza Conceptual 0 N. De Anza Conceptual 0 S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual )õl Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual 0 Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - ,~ 2..1 c¡... s.f. IO!"'¡~'1:::' ,- Employees/Shift - "",::,,-roarking Required""' 30~) Sf' Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - FAR - 2.7.6 '7"Max. Parking Provided 3 7 f£, YES ~ NO 0 1<2>-1\ --- ~~~"'-""'-"~-'"'''''"''-...~ ;. i¡¡;\; j,' , . .,' , ._ ..~. . . . 'INttIAL"iŒaYt'SøORC.E-;jj[IS:r." .'. . .' i::;¡¡¡:~,.·; ,J! ,.. _" ~""', l' - ---\1M;~-- ,--~<*~=""'(;W'.J:,~~.- -', ., --~ A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 1. land Use Element 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2. Public Safety Element 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 3. Housing Element 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 4. Transportation Element 29. Fremont Union High School District 5. Environmental Resources 30. Cupertino Union School District 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 31. Pacific Gas and Eiectric 7. land Use Map 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 8. Noise Element Amendment 33.· County Sheriff 9. City Ridgeline Policy 34. CAL TRANS 10. Constraint Maps 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Excesses Center, 1976) 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 14. Geological Report (site specific) 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 40. County Hazardous Waste Management 16. Zoning Map Plan 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 18. City Noise Ordinance 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel leak Site C. CITY AGENCIES Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and 19. Community Development Dep!. List Substances Site 20. Public Works Dep!. 21. Parks & Recreation Department F. OTHER SOURCES 22. Cupertino Water Utility 44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 46. Experience w/project of similar 23. County Planning Department scope/characteristics 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 47. ABAG Projection Series 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete. the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond conciseiy. and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Pre parer's Affidavit. G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. "'Project Plan Set of Legislative Document "'Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) lß-12 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: \ »- 0 r::- C ë c:t: _ r:: os os 0 os r:: -os- os os- tí .~ 0 0 ..c u .- '- ..r:: 0 0 ISSUES: -.- ~ ......-:51ão I- .- os o os c:: II)~'¡¡: Cle. tn := Q. ze. [and Supporting Information Sources] Q r:: E en Co .- i- ll) r:: E E õ.~- Q)tn :::0 Q.~- ..J'- ::¡¡; 0 c..en en r:: ..Jen I I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a D D D g scenic vista? [5.9,24,41,44] , I b) Substantially damage scenic resources, D D D ßl ! including. but not limited to, trees, rock ! outcroppings, and historic buildings within a i state scenic highway? [5,9.11.24,34,41,44] I c) Substantially degrade the existing visual D D D ..Iq I i character or quality of the site and its i I surroundings? [1,17,19,44] I d) Create a new source of substantial light or D D D 129- ! glare, which would adversely affect day or I nighttime views in the area? [1.16,44] II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In . determining whether impacts to agricultural . . I resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts . on agriculture and farmland. Would the I project: . I a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique D D D ~ Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide I Importance (Farmland), as shown on the I i maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland I Mapping and Monitoring Program of the i California Resources Agency, to non- I I agricultural use? [5.7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for D D D }{J I agricultural use, or a Williamson Act I contract? [5.7 ,23] I c) Involve other changes in the existing D D D t"t I environment which. due to their location or , I nature, could result in conversion of I Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] I , lß-13 \ ISSUES: ».... C _ 0 Cc l _ C C C .. -III.... ea co 0 co 111111.... - .!!! 0 0 .co.c"-Io.o .coo u .....- ~ 1-tþ:_ñšO ~._ III o III C:~ II) .- .¡¡: C) c. '" ~ Q. zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] c) C E en C ._ 10.0 II) C E E õ.~- (1)tn :=0 c).~- -1'- :¡; 0 c..en en C -1 enl III. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the \ applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon I to make the following determinations. Would the project: ! I a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of 0 0 0 R!. i the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44] I b) Violate any air quality standard or 0 0 0 ß I contribute substantially to an existing or I I projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] I c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net 0 0 0 fit ! I i increase of any criteria pollutant for which \ the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality I standard (including releasing emissions \ which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] ! d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial 0 0 0 p¡f. pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a 0 0 0 ,¡¡g. substantial number of people? [4.37,44] IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would " the project: , ¡ a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either 0 0 0 p¡¡' directly or through habitat modifications, on I any species identified as a candidate. I ! sensitive, or special status species in local or I regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by I I , the California Department of Fish and Garne I or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? I [5,10.27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any 0 0 0 y¡ riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans. policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5.10.27.44] , c) Have a substantial adverse effect on El.. , 0 0 0 ¡ federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal \'ú-l4 i I »- !: _ 0 !:ë - !: C s::::¡:; -"'- CO «Ii 0 CU "'",- - .~ u u .r:. u.c·- .... or. u u u ISSUES: -.- ~ ~¡¡::.....1üO I- .- '" o '" c~ II)'-'~ C)c. fI) ~ Co zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] Q) !: E en C .- "- II) !: E E õ.~- Q)tn ::0 Q) .~- ..J'- :¡¡¡ u Q.1fJ IfJ !: ..J1fJ pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] I d) Interfere substantially with the movement 0 0 0 ~ I of any native resident or migratory fish or I wildlife species or with established native I resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery I sites? [5,10.12,21,26] Ie) Conflict with any local policies or 0 0 0 ý:l ! ordinances protecting biological resources. I such as a tree preservation policy or I i ordinance? [11,12,41] , i f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted i Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural 0 0 0 ~ I Community Conservation Plan, or other I approved local, regional, or state habitat ! conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] Iv. CUL rURAL RESOURCES -- Would the I project: . a) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 $I the significance of a historical resource as . defined in §15064.5? [5.13,41] , r b) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 ftI I the significance of an archaeological I resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41] I c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique 0 0 0 ,t¡ I i paleontological resource or site or unique : geologic feature? [5,13,41] , , i d) Disturb any human remains, including 0 0 0 ø. I those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 1[1,5] 1 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the ¡project: I a) Expose people or structures to potential I substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury. or death involving: I I I i) Rupture of a known earthq uake fault, as 0 0 0 )it i delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo ! Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the l~-ì6 I c _ 0 I »- c- , _ c c C·- c -..- raca oca ....- - .~ (,) u .cu.c·-~ .cOO 0 ISSUES: -.- ~ 1-¡¡::....1GO 1-'- .. o .. c~ .,.-'- Oc, (I') ~ Co zc, : [and Supporting Information Sources] '" C E ., C .;;:.-... ., C E E õ.~- Q)C) ':::0 "'.~- L D..en ...J'- :;: 0 ...Jen en C ; ! State Geologist for the area or based on ! other substantial evidence of a known fault? I Refer to Division of Mines and Geoiogy ! Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] , , ! ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 ISi!' I [2,5.10.44] I iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including 0 0 0 .I8l I i liquefaction? [2.5,10.39,44] I ! iv) Landslides? [2.5.10.39,44] 0 0 0 £'9. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the 0 0 0 ¡;;¡: loss of topsoil? [2,5.10,44] ! , i c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is 0 0 0 Þl I unstable, or that would become unstable as I ! a result of the project, and potentially result i in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, ! subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? I [2,5.10,39] ; I d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined 0 0 0 !t I in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code I (1997), creating substantial risks to life or I property? [2,5.10] ! e) Have soils incapable of adequately 0 0 0 0 I supporting the use of septic tanks or NJp., I alternative waste water disposal systems I where sewers are not available for the I disposal of waste water? [6.9.36,39] ,. I i VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS I MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or 0 0 0 )!t the environment through the routine I transport. use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or 0 0 0 ø. I the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions I involving the release of hazardous materials , I into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] I i c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle 0 0 0 -&.. hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile Iß-l(¿¡ »- c- 0 c- -c r::::: C·- c -1'11- tans o1Q 1'111'11- - .!!! 0 0 .cU.c;::;~ .cOO 0 ISSUES: -.- ë 1-ct:_nsO 1-'- I'll o I'll c~ 111'-'- tile. II) ~ 0. ze. [and Supporting Information Sources] Q C E III C :¡:._.... III C E E õ.~- GJC» =:0 Q.~- ..J'- :¡: 0 Q.(/J (/J C ..J(/J of an existing or proposed school? [2.29.30.40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a 0 0 0 0 list of hazàrdous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section N/yt 65962.5 and. as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 0 use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport ¡V/A or public use airport, would the project resuit in a safety hazard for people residing or I working in the project area? [ ] I f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 0 0 - 0 I airstrip, would the project result in a safety fA hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically 0 0 0 -~ interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] h) Expose people or structures to a 0 0 0 /I§'( significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with I wildlands?[1,2,44] I VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY I -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or 0 0 0 fit waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater 0 0 0 á I I supplies or interfere substantially with I I groundwater recharge such that there would ! be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a I ¡lowering of the local groundwater table level ! . (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing i I nearby wells would' drop to a level I which would not support existing land uses I . or planned uses for which permits have been I granted)? [20.36,42] \ß-ll \ ISSUES: ».... 1:.... 0 I:ë -I: s:: c;: -...... fa ns 0 co ........ .... .! (J U .cu"c"-"- ~uu U .....- ~ 1-¡¡::_1aO J-.- .. o .. C~ II)'-'¡: C)a. I/) ~ CL za. [and Supporting Information Sources] Q I: E CI) c .- '- II) I: E E õ.~- Q) en :!: 0 Q.!:?- - D..I/) -1'- :;u -II/) I/) I: , c) Substantially alter the existing drainage 0 0 0 .ès( pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion of siltation on- or off-site? [14. 20,36] I d) Substantially alter the existing drainage 0 0 0 J"t I pattern of the site or area, including through I the alteration of the course of a stream or I river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which I would result in flooding on- or off-site I I [20.36.38] , ! e) Create or contribute runoff water which 0 0 0 );:( I I i would exceed the capacity of existing or i , planned stormwater drainage systems or I provide substantial additional sources of i polluted runoff? [20,36.42] f) Otherwise substantially degrade water 0 0 0 ~ quality? [20,36,37] , g) Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood 0 0 0 0 hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood I Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate N/A Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i [2,38] , h) Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area 0 0 0 0 structures which would impede or redirect t-JJp,[ I flood flows? [2,38] I i) Expose people or structures to a significant 0 0 0 ~ I risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, I including flooding as a result of the failure of I a levee or darn? [2.36.38] I j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or 0 0 0 JQ I . rnudflow? [2.36,38] I I I : IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would ! the project: ! a) Physically divide an established 0 0 0 ~ ! community? [7,12.22.41] , , , .ø:1 , I b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, 0 0 0 I policy, or regulation of an agency with , tB-l<6 ! - ».... 0 c.... -c C ë c;:: c -"'.... '" 01 0 '" "'01.... .... .!:!:! u u .J:: u .-.... ..c: (.) (.) (.) ISSUES: .....- ~ 1-;::5êUo 1-,- '" o '" t:~ en .- .- CI C. (I) ~ 0- zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] c) C E en C ~ .- .... en C E E õ.!2'- (1) C) ;!: 0 c).~- ....1.- :¡; (.) ! c..en en .: ....I en jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? i [1.7.8.16,17.18,44] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat D D D J& conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5.6,9.26] I i X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the ! project: 1 a) Result in the loss of availability of a known D D D R I mineral resource that would be of value to ! the region and the residents of the state? ! [5.10] i b) Result in the loss of availability of a D D D :J4... locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a iocal general plan, I specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] I XI. NOISE -- Would the project result in: I a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, D D }'§. D I noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other I agencies? [8,18.44] I b) Exposure of persons to or generation of D D .& D I excessive groundborne vibration or I groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44] , ! c) A substantial permanent increase in D D $l D ! ambient noise levels in the project vicinity I above levels existing without the project? ¡ [8.18] I d) A substantial temporary or periodic D D ,[j( D ! increase in ambient noise levels in the I I i project vicinity above levels existing without I i the project? [8,18,44] , I I e) For a project located within an airport land D D D D use plan or, where such a plan has not been I N/fr I i adopted, within two miles of a public airport ! or public use airport. would the project I I expose people residing or working in the l~-lg I >-.... 0 1:.... I -I: r::: 1: I:: :¡:; I: -"'.... '" '" 0 '" "''''.... .... .!!! 0 0 .c 0 .-... ..1:00 0 ISSUES: .....- ~ 1-;¡::;1ûO 1-'- '" o '" c~ In'-'¡¡: C)c. IIJ ~ Co zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] Q) I: E tn c: .- s- In I: E E õ.~- Q)cn :::0 Q).!2'- ...J'- :¡;; 0 I a.t/) t/) I: ...Jt/) project area to excessive noise levels? , [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 D D D airstrip, wòuld the project expose people NJ A- I residing or working in the project area to excessive noise ievels? [8,18] XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project: \ a) Induce substantial population growth in an D D 0 ß\ area, either directly (for example, by i ¡ proposing new homes and businesses) or I I indirectly (for example, through extension of I I roads or other infrastructure)? [3.16.47,44] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing D D D )i¡ housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people. D D D ~. necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or I physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant I environmental impacts, in order to maintain I acceptable service ratios. response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: I I Fire protection? [19,32,44] D D D ~ i Police protection? [33,44] D D D .;:8 I I Schools? [29.30,44] D D D j( ! ! ! Parks? [5,17,19.21,26,27,44] D D D g I ì , l ! Other public facilities? [19.20,44] D D D ß( , I I XIV. RECREATION -- ! i a) Would the project increase the use of D 0 D ,g I existing neighborhood and regional parks or l~- <òO »- c _ 0 c- _c c: c::¡:; c -..- mea ons ....- - .~ u 0 .s::.uJ:;'- ..coo 0 ISSUES: -.- 9 1-¡¡:_caO I- .- .. o .. c~ '" .- .¡: CI 00 en ~ Q. zOo [and Supporting Information Sources] CI> C E cnC .-'- '" C E E õ.~- (1) tn ~ 0 CI> .91- Q.(/) -Jêñ ::¡¡; g -I(/) - other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the I facility would occur or be accelerated? 1[5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational 0 0 0 0 facilities or require the construction or N/fì expansion of recreational facilities which I might have an adverse physical effect on the I environment? [5,44] I ! XV. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC -- I Would the project: 1 a) Cause an increase in traffic which is 0 0 ^ 0 i substantial in relation to the existing traffic. ! load and capacity of the street system (i.e.. I result in a substantial increase in either the i number of vehicle trips, the volume to , ! capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at I intersections)? [4,20.35,44] I b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, 0 0 ~ 0 I a level of service standard established by the . I county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4.20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, 0 0 0 ')9. including either an increase in traffic levels or I a change in location that results in , substantial safety risks? [4.?] I d) Substantially increase hazards due to a 0 0 0 .~ i , design feature (e.g., sharp curves or I dangerous intersections) or incompatible I uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] I I e) Result in inadequate emergency access? I 0 0 0 ß. I I i [2,19.32.33,44] I f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 .Bt i [17,44] , g) Conflict with adopted policies. plans, or 0 0 0 BI.. , programs supporting alternative I ¡ transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle ; racks)? [4,34] I I XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS- I i Would the project: lß-~\ I c _ 0 I »- c- _ c c C +:i C -111- ea CO 0 ctI 111111- - .~ u to) ..c u..c.- .... .c",'" '" I ISSUES: -.- ë )-.-+J1O 0 1-'- III o III c~ "':!::'¡:e>Q. U)~c. zQ. [and Supporting Information Sources] CI> C E fI) C .-.... '" C E E õ.~- Q) tD :!:: 0 CI>.!!I- - ....1'- :E'" D..CJ) CJ) .= ....ICJ) a) Exceed wastewater treatment 0 0 0 b<t. requirements of the applicable Regional I Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of 0 0 0 Ç3.. new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the . construction of which could cause significant ! environmental effects? [36.22.28,36] I c) Require or result in the construction of 0 0 0 J2, I new storm water drainage facilities or I expansion of existing facilities, the I construction of which could cause significant ! environmental effects? [5.22.28.36,44] I ; I I e) Result in a determination by the 0 0 0 ~ , wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing I commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient 0 0 0 Þ'1. permitted capacity to accommodate the I . project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] g) Comply with federal, state, and local 0 0 0 1'9. I statutes and regulations related to solid I waste? [?] l~-ß2 a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 ,Kí degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining ¡leVelS, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of I the major periods of California history or I prehistory? 0 ! b) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 )Q i individually limited, but cumulatively I considerable? ("Cumulatively I considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when ¡ viewed in connection with the effects of past I projects, the effects of other current projects, I and the effects of probable future projects)? 0 c) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 ~ effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 0 I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents. from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Print Preparer's Name ~R ,t' ~ Go \" "'l'": "" J Preparer's Signature l~-~3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factQrs checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Aesthetics 0 Agriculture Resources 0 Air Quality 0 Biological Resources 0 Cultural Resources 0 Geology /Soils 0 Hazards & Hazardous 0 Hydrology / Water 0 Land Use / Planning Materials Quality 0 Mineral Resources 0 Noise 0 Population / Housing 0 Public Services 0 Recreation ;8., T ransportationfT raffic 0 Utilities / Service 0 Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) finds that: 0 The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. !! Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment. but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards. and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. nothing further is required. CÔ\lr, ~I ^Ù Staff Evaluator Ó 00 . ERC Chairperson ¡2-IIL//os- Date I I 12-{ \ Lt.1, 't Db Date M l fò - <"6'1 DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM WHOLE FOODS MARKET PROJECT FILE NOS. U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18, EA-2005-16 Traffic and Circulation Impacts Truck Route. Market truck traffic must be confined to the major arterial streets. Stelling Road is not a truck route. The store operator will need to plan a truck route for deliveries, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, and inform all of its delivery contractors. General Traffic. A project traffic report was prepared by Pang Engineers, Inc. and reviewed by Public Works Department staff (Exhibit B). The report was prepared to comply with City transportation level of service (LOS) policies and also Congestion Management Program (CMP) standards. The net peak hour traffic trips (excludes car dealership trips) is 2,929 daily trips with 57 trips during the AM peak hour and 328 trips during the PM peak hour. Looking at the affected signalized intersections for "Existing Traffic," "Background Traffic," and "With Project Traffic" conditions, all studied intersections continue to meet City LOS and CMP LOS standards. The traffic report did identify traffic operational deficiencies at the Stevens Creek and Stelling Road intersection that would be worsen with the Whole Foods project, but not to a point that degraded LOS below City standards. The traffic consultant recommended that the applicant study the possibility of lengthening the left turn pocket and lane on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard and/ or lengthening the left turn pocket on southbound Stelling Road. Cut-Through Traffic. There is a potential for project traffic cutting easterly through Alves Drive, a residential neighborhood. This potential cannot be studied until after the project is occupied and traffic patterns have had a chance to normalize. The neighborhood is also involved in the study. A study will need to be funded and funds set aside to construct necessary traffic improvements. l5-ffi t.Jlhib;t: [5- \ December 20, 2005 To: From: Subject: Members of the Cupertino Planning Commission Larry Burriesci, Resident of Alves Drive Application no. U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 (EA-2005-16) Whole Foods Members of the Planning Commission: Thank you for the notification and for this opportunity to participate in the permit, architectural and site approval discussion for this important and welcome project. This correspondence reflects prior discussions with several other residents of Alves Drive and it summarizes our more significant questions and concerns. I have also visited with four current Scofield Drive neighbors of the existing Whole Foods store, and was pleased overall that the management of Whole Foods seems to be interested in being a good neighbor to surrounding residents This letter addresses two areas: (I) Compliance with Existing Laws and Ordinances We expect a situation that will allow the applicant to comply with existing laws and ordinances in the design, implementation and long-term operation of the tàcility and especially in the initial demolition and construction phases. (2) Parking Lot Design It is clear that curb cuts on the Stelling Road side of the parking lot are essential to getting traffic onto the proposed Whole Foods property, and that is not an issue as long as the Stelling entrances are not exits. We ask that the parking lot be designed so as to deliver all departing auto and truck traffic onto Stevens Creek Boulevard as is currently the case with the existing Whole Foods site. (1) Compliance with Existing Laws and Ordinances: (a) Noise Ordinance City approval is required for HV AC design and for operation of air conditioning, heating, ventilation infrastructure. The noise ordinance requires compliance at all times of the day or night. Roof-mounted equipment must be appropriately shieldedlbaftled for noise suppression. There should be no North-facing output in excess of the allowed levels associated with noise generating equipment. A proper design will avoid a repeat of the costly and protracted after-the- fact solutions to the equipment noise problems from the YMCA. Implementation of a properly designed sound wall along the north boundary of the property needs to be discussed. (b) Store Operating Hours With respect to the noise ordinance, the term "store operating hours" must be better defined in the application as well as the process for approval to change operating hours. Besides just "open for business" hours, store operating hours must include operation of shipping/receiving and related activities with respect to the noise ordinance such as: Store sound systems - outdoor public address, telephone ringer, and paging - directed to the South only, and only at sound pressure levels allowed by the noise ordinance, and not during IOpm-7am. No outdoor facility maintenance from lOpm-18m. Proper maintenance, repair and setting of fire and break-in alarm systems to eliminate false alarms. 1'6- ~LP L. Burriesci page I 00 (c) Noisy Equipment No Electrical, Motorized, hydraulic and pneumatic equipment operated between IOpm-7am Carton crusher Bailer Shredder Pallet handler Recycling equipment Electrical Generators Transformers Roll-up doors/gates Dock levelers (d) Delivery Vehicles Arrival Time - No waiting or camping in trucks or cars during lOpm-7am No Delivery-related noise generation during lOpm-7am No Back-up alarms No Engines running No StereolRadio No Horns No Yelling or loud talking We expect Whole Foods to accept responsibility for informing and instructing the truck operators and for providing clearly-posted sound/noise ordinances for them. We expect vigorous enforcement by the city including prompt citations for noise violations. (e) GarbageIRecycling trucks, Parking lot sweeping truck, etc. - No trucks between 10pm-7am (t) Lighting The applicant must submit for city approval a site lighting design and plan that eliminates "spillover" of light. The plan should provide for suppression of direct North-facing lighting from the building or the parking lot. Lighting must be directed toward store property and away from residences, while shielding North-facing bright parts ofJamps. (g) Refuse Management Refuse management must be designed and operated to ensure containment of odor. No garbage/recycling preparation or pickup activity to be conducted between IOpm-7am No processing or storage of hazardous waste (2) Parking Lot Design The existing Whole Foods store currently operating In Cupertino is situated such that all customer and truck traffic must leave the property by entering Stevens Creek Boulevard. Stevens Creek Boulevard is a six lane thoroughfare designed to handle substantial volumes of automobile and truck traffic. It is most likely the case that Stevens Creek Boulevard in this vicinity will be capable of handling projected traffic levels for some time to come. lß-'~l L. Burriesci page 2 of 3 Conversely, Stelling Road in this vicinity is a four lane road narrowing down to one lane in each direction with no traffic lights, with residential properties on both sides and with very restrictive accommodation for automobile drivers to execute left turns or U-turns. For example, at thel Quinlan Center, only three autos can fit into the left turn lane, and tmcks are not able to eXécuteí U-turns at all. There is one preferred route for these cars and trucks to use after exiting the Whole Foods parking lot onto Stelling Road. As so many hundreds of vehicles do now, they would turn right onto Alves Drive in order to "circle the block" with easily executable right turns to wind up back at Saich Way and Stevens Creek Boulevard where a traffic light allows them to turn either left or right onto Stevens Creek. Alves Drive is a very narrow residential street. It is essentially a one-way street with no outlet to Stelling Road because it has not been able to handle such volumes of traffic for over twenty years. There is pretty constant foot traffic on Alves Drive that must share the street with a steady flow of autos and trucks. There is a 3-ton vehicle weight limit on Alves drive that is posted but never observed nor enforced. It is clear that curb cuts on the Stelling Road side of the proposed Whole Foods parking lot are essential to efficiently route traffic onto the proposed Whole Foods property. That is not an issue as long as these proposed Stelling entrances into the parking lot are not able to be used as exits We ask that the parking lot be designed so as to deliver all departing traffic onto Stevens Creek Boulevard as is currently the case at the existing Whole Foods site. During Demolition and Constmction No constmction or demolition tmcks on Alves Drive - we encourage the city to implement a trial street closure of Alves Drive at its intersection with Stelling Road during the Whole Foods demolition and constmction period. Conclusion: Although I am personally enthusiastic about Whole Foods coming to its proposed new location, I would vigorously devote a tremendous amount of time and energy to opposing the project if: (1) The applicant were not prepared to practice compliance with the existing laws and ordinances during demolition, constmction and operation of the store as a necessary condition of doing business here. (2) There were no accommodation of the need to deliver all traffic to Stevens Creek Boulevard and none directly to Stelling Road Sincerely, ~~~~ Larry Bu SCI 20900 Alves Drive (408) 257-7519 Attachment: Satellite photo showing both the current and proposed locations of Whole Foods Market, Alves Drive, Scofield Drive and Stelling Road [1()- t£? L. Burriesci page 3 of 3 ·.' ,- .' - . . ..... . .: ~ . , ~I . ..., to' J. " ' ',\I. -.' ... é.II, '~ 16 _ . _ \~r£>q Cupertino Chamber of Commerce Your Partner in Silicon Valley December 20, 2005 Attention: Cupertino Planning Commission Good Afternoon, Due to this meeting falling at such a difficult time of the year we are unable to have a Chamber representative at the Planning Commission meeting. However, we feel it is very important that our voice be heard'on two items on the agenda this evening. Item 1. Applicant: Peter Ko, Whole Foods Location: 20955 Stevens Creek Blvd. We hope the Commission agrees with the Chamber to support Whole Foods moving to a vacant building which was previously used as a car dealership. This site sits on one of the busiest roads in Cupertino with new growth all around it. Although Whole Foods currently is across the street, the store is very crowded and the parking leaves a lot to be desired. The new location would enable the store to have an exemplary store allowing a larger retail pad with ample parking to better serve the community of Cupertino and the surrounding communities. We urge the commission to vote yes on this application. Item 2. Applicant: KCR Development, Inc. Location: 19620-19780 Stevens Creek Blvd. We support this re-construction of the current shopping center. We feel the layout will better serve those who shop and visit the restaurants, allowing more visibility from the road. The expanse from 15,267 square feet to 37,250 square feet complies with our policy for increasing the commercial/retail space in Cupertino and will benefit both the city and the community. We understand that KCR Development has gone above and beyond the requirements for the restaurants to have lower emissions from their vents and support them for their consideration of the neighbors. Sincerely, ~~ Christine Giusiana, CEO 20455 Silverado Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 (408)-252-7054 www.cupertino-chamber.org 1~-qO r cft~ \ q{V\ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Cupertino Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the matter described below. The public is encouraged to attend and speak. APPLICATION NO.: APPLICANT: LOCATION: U-2005-20, ASA-2005-18 (EA-2005-16) Peter Ko (Whole Foods) 20955 Stevens Creek Blvd. APN: 326-31-018 326-31-020 DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to demolish structures associated with a former car dealership and construct a one story, 63,000 square foot market Architectural and Site Approval for a new one story, 63,000 square foot market HEARING DATE: ADDRESS: December 20, 2005 beginning at 6:45 p.rn. Council Chamber, Community Hall, 10350 Torre Avenue If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please note that Planning Commission policy is to allow an applicant and groups to speak for 10 minutes and individuals to speak for 3 minutes. The agenda for this application will be available on the Friday afternoon preceding the meeting. NOTE: Agenda may be subiect to change. If interested in an item, or have questions, please call the Planning Department at 408-777-3308 prior to the meeting date to verify that the item is still on the agenda. The time this item will be heard on the agenda cannot be predicted. NOTE TO OWNERS OF RECORD: This notice is sent to owners of real property as shown on the last tax assessment roll. Tenants are not necessarily notified. Steve Piasecki Community Development Department ì~rC11 RECEIVED DEC 1 32005 labels Kiersa Witt From: Helena Cohen [helena_cohen@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20.20059:21 AM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Approval of Planned Marketplace Shopping Center To Whom It May Concern: I heartily endorse the plan to build a "flagship" Whole Foods Market store on the old Anderson Chevrolet site. The current store is too small for the number of people shopping there and I believe that the store culture is well suited to the community.. I only hope that the city is highly selective about the kind of business that replaces the current Whole Foods store. It would be wonderful if the city could court a bookstore chain (i.e. Barnes and Noble/Borders) to open there--I still believe that the store "A Clean Well Lighted Place for Books" is sorely missed by the community. PLEASE--no more restaurants, clothing retail or fast food! Sincerely, Helena Cohen 11105 La Paloma Drive, Cupertino, CA 95014 12/20/05 l0-Q2. Colin Jung From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Friday, December 16, 2005 8:25 AM Colin Jung Piu Ghosh FW: Whole Foods Markets -----Original Message----- From: Eilene Peak (mailto:epeak@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 7:04 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Whole Foods Markets We are unable to attend the Planning Commission Public Hearing on Dec. 20 or Jan. 17. However we wish to make our thoughts known to you. WE VERY MUCH SUPPORT THE PROPOSED WHOLE FOODS MARKETS project. The location is wonderful and Cupertino will do well to have such a fine business in our community. At the current location, the parking lot and market is always full, and the customers and staff are always helpful and cheerful. Their business practices and products as well as their treatment of their workers, suppliers, and customers are first rate. We are thrilled with the proposed project. Thank you. Eilene and Mike Peak 10386 Amistad Ct. Cupertino, CA 95014 epeak@earthlink.net 1 \lò-Q3 Page 1 of 1 Colin Jung From: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Friday, December 16, 20051:51 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: Piu Ghosh Subject: FW: Whole Foods Market -----Original Message---n From: bob.myers@avagotech.com [mailto:bob.myers@avagotech.comj Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:59 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Cc: bobmyers5@comcast.net Subject: Whole Foods Market TO: Cupertino Planning Commission I would like to express my STRONG SUPPORT for APPROVAL of Whole Foods Markets' application for construction on the former Anderson Chevrolet property. Sincerely, Bob Myers 1127 Elmsford Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 408-446-4894 \ß-gk 12/19/2005 ~. cy¡ I ..£) \j\ -j o u 6" ~ c ~ 3 "' . ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ () o ? . 0- " ~ ~ o ~ () c . ~ o ß)3 15J~ ro ...p. (") r-0 III 0 ~oct-'-x- 0..00-0 ~1!R- r.ïr-S~D:J3 7<:" 01 _. ~ OJ 3 U1 ::; :!1.,.., ::J Q I 0 .......::: ::J W N '" m @SClLOC:-CO -<<D:C>~3QJ (lJ ~ ~~ e :r 00... . g .......0 ...::>. :::!. () '" o ~ CD 3 ~ 0) ~~ }! . '" , " " 111 S' "" v 51 ". ~ m 3 ~ ~ g. . n 8"3 ~ '" , " m ro '" " o , " r 0 ~ n · ~ ::¡ ~ " õ' 3' 3 . , .0 <\. · . c Q " . " 0 11 . ~ · '" D ~ . c ~ , < ~ · ~ u :;; ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ OJ') I~ z '" c CD '- ~ "" " '" "" OJ CD r '- ^ '" ~. ~ 0) 0 0) ~ " '" '" ~ '" ... '" () ~ . z c 3 ~ ~ ~ '" 0) ... ... "' õ' . u ,. , ~ "' . ;\ õ' , ..... '" .... <1> o <1> .... ~. :;:' EJ-h~\',-t-: c-\ City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 . Telephone: (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 777·3333 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Ralph A. Qualls, Jr., Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 2005 TO: Planning Commission CC: Steve Piasecki, Director, Community Development; Colin Jung, Project Planner Glenn GoePfert~sistant Director of Public Works FROM: SUBJECT: Proposed Whole Foods Development - Stevens Creek Blvd.lStelling Road: Clarification of Traffic Engineering Requirements Although Public Works has commented previously on the proposed project, we feel that the following clarifications of our requirements are sufficiently important to include them specifically in the approval of the subject project. 1. The initial traffic study for this project undertaken for the City by Pang Engineers identified deficiencies in the left turn lane capacities on the westbound, eastbound, and southbound approaches to the Stevens Creek Boulevard/Stelling Road intersection. When completed and in operation, the subject project will increase each of these deficiencies. Public Works has determined that it is most appropriate for the project to correct the left turn lane deficiency on the southbound Stelling Road approach to the intersection as a condition of development. We recommend that the project be required to extend the left turn lane on the southbound Stelling Road approach to the Stevens Creek Boulevard/Stelling Road intersection, as directed by the Director of Public Works. 2. The initial traffic study for this project indicated that the existing on-street parking adjoining the site along the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard might conflict with truck traffic accessing the site from Stevens Creek Boulevard. Public Works shares this concern and goes further to note that the existing parking constitutes a potential conflict with fast moving traffic along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The current Director of Public Works has consistently opposed allowing parking to be placed along Stevens Creek Boulevard for this reason, and wants to take this opportunity to remove the existing parking along the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard adjoining the project site. We recommend that the project be required to remove the existing parking along the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard adjoiuing the project site, making the necessary changes to the existing signing and striping, as directed by the Director of Public Works. l ß-qto City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 777-3333 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Ralph A. Qualls, Jr., Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 2005 FROM: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Glenn Goepfert~sistant Director of Public Works TO: SUBJECT: Proposed Whole Foods Development - Stevens Creek Blvd.lStelling Road: Truck Route Plan Requirements The developer has submitted a truck route plan pursuant to the recommendations of the Pang Engineers traffic study and Public Works. According to Sandhill Properties project manager Karen Ngo, the truck route plan currently consists of the following: Trucks would come from 280, exit De Anza Blvd., make a right on Stevens Creek Boulevard. make a right into the site, make a left at the end of the drive, and then back into the loading dock. Trucks leaving the site would make a right out of the site onto Stevens Creek Boulevard and go straight to get onto Highway 85. Whole Foods plans to distribute the above truck route to their vendors. In addition, Public Works will require the following additions to the truck route plan: 1. Whole Foods will have to have vendors and any other truck transporters that would enter the site sign an agreement that they will adhere to the truck route plan. 2. A turning template is currently shown on the preliminary project site plan to show that a truck with a trailer, having driven to the north side of the parking lot from Stevens Creek Boulevard can make the make a turn from the northbound aisle to the westbound aisle and then back into the loading dock. A turning template must also be shown for truck movement out of the loading dock that shows that a left turn onto the southbound aisle to the Stevens Creek Boulevard can be negotiated. The site plan will be required to be altered as necessary to make the necessary truck movements possible and more likely to be adhered to. 3. Other changes to the parking lot layout may be required, such as restricting parking aisle access to the ingress/egress aisle to Stevens Creek Boulevard within the first 125 feet or so from the Stevens Creek Boulevard driveway. \6-11"1 CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARA nON As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4,1974, January 17 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on January 17, 2006. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2005-20 (EA-2005-16), ASA-2005-18 Peter Ko (Whole Foods) 20955 Stevens Creek Blvd DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Use Permit to demolish structures associated with a former car dealership and construct a one-story, 68,214 square foot market with mezzanine level. Architectural Site approval for a new one-story 68,214 square foot market with mezzanine level. FINDINGS OF DECISIONMAKING BODY The Planning Commission granted a mitigated Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts with the included traffic mitigation measures incorporated in the project approval: 1) Requirement to study and fund the potential lengthening of the left-turn lane(s) on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard and/ or southbound Stelling Road at the intersection of these two streets. 2) Requirement to study the potential of project cut-through traffic into the Garden Gate neighborhood and fund necessary traffic improvements. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development l~-qß CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on City Clerk g/erc/negEA200516 16-<11 4. Operational deficiencies at the Stevens Creek Boulevard I Stelling Road intersection, and along Stevens Creek Boulevard westbound along the project frontage would be improved with street widening and restriping. 5. Vehicular access and circulation as proposed on the site plan appear adequate for automobiles with the suggested improvements in place. However, truck access requires conditions of approval for selected ingress and egress movements to predetermined driveways. The traffic analysis report concludes that there is adequate capacity in the existing transportation system to develop the entire project as proposed. 26 IE)~ lCO APPENDIX lß-{01 Site Plan ~ß -l02 i i II i ¡ ¡I ~·'ì. .., "'. ~--_._._.- \ \__.__n.. ;II o J> tJ ~i _"'#1:: ~-= z o ;II ~ 1: .. ~ m r- r- Z ~ 'i {' r ',. 'YY).::"':,-,-)--.=·~_~_ r" !-1""-/1 \",r{~¡ (,ß ry__)i L '.. '. __.~j~l, ___.,' ! \___~ . ,~-..{ SN3^31S CèI'1A31nOe >l33è1::;¡ ¡ ~ ~ ¡ ~ i:!S1 ,J( \ .. + .. + .. + ~ !: I~: } ! ~ ·"'~L.~"",. .",~., '''''KlS'' . , , , · · · · · £]1-<6 \ -......-.. ,4IIi:..I NV'1c13J.ISA}lVNtwn3l:ld NY1d ocno nsv -- - ........ -- -, NY1d WI . - _w ~ lUll A..- -~~ - ,(J-M"" ..... EB ~ '-- '-,....J -- .... .....- -.. ~ - -~-- ~-~ -~ -- - "j .~ ,,,J '.....,.,.... - "1'- -/- 7"')'7" ~ . ~ j-i\.)C ~W.SNOO):O:l.1.ON lNlijdSSiRjOO1:lcl ~ -~ -~ - EÐ oIYl'I,u>l -- '" \~') (-~.) " ,~~ LJ. J r_ C)"~'~ ..~~~j () , ..--" -~~ _.~ J ~ Ð__. - -- ~ -- .--'IrSoI.".,!,. nwJ.'U~""1r!"I'rVf'..1BaIJ.' rT1t'l'l __"''911~'''''^ 9T1'r.L'¡' __..~ en'rJ.'" ~_J'!>I'ÐIOIV"'J:'J'..w::>:) '1'10'''''.' __oICWI"OIW'!' "h'.LOJ. ~!I""" -*",01 (.oHI't"I'~'" """"'ÞNIcnr-tIIN rM_L,.a9al;>\l' 'II"" 'll'õliWt'JIJ." SNO¡J.'V'lnS"t.l ,''', ,- [\ :.....~':) '-.__/v--"" \...._/' M'_M"~ "'uroI!I:<I 1:"':== e '::IU's¡:IeijIp/\t'O) AN't'dNO:J A1"I:13d01:!'d TlIHONVS ,(~O.:lIlY.) 'ONU¡'¡3dn:¡ .13}~'v'1^J saoo~ 3l0HM Intersection Counts Iß- \ 0'1 BA YMETRICS TRAFFIC RESO UR CES INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY PROJECT: CUPERTINO TMC SURVEY DATE: 10/6/2005 DAY: THURSDAY N-S Approach: MARY - DE ANZA COLLEGE ENT. SURVEY TIME: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM E-W Approach: STEVENS CREEK CITY: CUPERTINO FILE: SCMRCPM PEAK HOUR t ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE VOLUMES I 05:00 PM I TO I 06:00 PM I ~ North I PHF= I 0.90 I ..;,,>J. 4 ~ ~ þ ~ * I PHF= I I 221 :..·..··>i>i 205 I 0.99 ....... >..... TOTAL .' I 1,111 ''''. I 3,752 I ~." 915 I 1,269 '."'Ib: I~ 1,412 I .. I 304 ~ þr 292 I 1,636 --... --... 1,377 I , t r PHF= ll: :.': . 0.97 STEVENS CREEK ~ ~ MARV - DE ANZA COLLEGE ENT. I PHF= I 0.88 I TIME PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND From To Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TOTAL SUR VE Y DA TA 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM 36 3 5 43 2 29 37 190 32 I 24 193 28 622 04: [5 PM - 04:30 PM 80 8 15 83 3 67 82 399 61 58 424 52 /,332 04:30 PM -- 04:45 PM 132 10 18 134 7 102 123 632 102 101 643 85 2,089 04:45 PM - 05:00 PM 191 14 24 199 10 130 173 896 157 147 851 128 2,910 05:00 PM --- 05:15 PM 238 24 28 254 16 175 235 1,154 224 206 1,093 183 3,830 05:[5 PM -- 05:30 PM 300 29 33 326 32 212 293 1,437 306 281 1,320 229 4,798 05:30 PM --- 05:45 PM 354 32 36 394 58 240 341 1,732 381 364 1.536 285 5,753 05:45 PM -- 06:00 PM 401 37 43 446 71 274 , 394 2,007 461 , 439 1,766 333 I 6,672 TOTAL BY PERIOD 04:00 PM --- 04:15 PM I 36 3 5 ! 43 2 29 37 190 32 24 193 28 621 04:15 PM --- 04:30 PM 44 5 10 40 I 38 45 209 29 34 231 24 710 04:30 PM --- 04:45 PM 52 2 3 51 4 35 4[ 233 41 43 219 33 757 04:45 PM --- 05:00 PM 59 4 6 65 3 28 50 264 55 46 208 43 .83/ 05:00 PM -- 05:15 PM 47 10 4 55 6 45 62 258 67 59 242 55 9/0 05:15 PM --- 05:30 PM 62 5 5 72 16 37 58 283 82 75 227 46 968 05:30 PM -- 05:45 PM 54 3 3 68 26 28 48 295 75 83 216 56 955 05:45 PM --- 06:00 PM '47 5 7 , 52 13 34 , 53 275 80 , 75 230 48 I 9/9 ! HOURLY TOTALS I , , 130 I 04:00 PM --- 05:00 PM 191 14 24 199 10 173 896 157 147 851 128 2,920 04:15 PM .- 05:15 PM 202 21 23 211 14 146 198 964 192 182 900 155 3,208 04:30 PM -- 05:30 PM 220 21 18 243 29 145 211 1,038 245 223 896 177 3,466 I 04:45 PM --- 05:45PM 222 22 18 260 51 138 218 1,100 279 263 893 200 3,664 'I 05:00 PM --- 06:00 PM 210 23 19 . 247 61 144 , 221 1,111 304 , 292 915 205 I 3,752 I East Bay: (5/0) 232-1271 SF/Peninsula: (415) 750-1317 I l0 a ~ ~ - BA YME TRICS TRAFFIC RESOURCES INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY PROJECT: CUPERTINO TMC SURVEY DATE: 10/6/2005 DAY: THURSDAY N-S Approach: SAICH SURVEY TIME: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM E-W Aooroach: STEVENS CREEK CITY: CUPERTINO FILE: SCSACPPM PEAK HOUR . t ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE VOLUMES I 04:30 PM I TO I 05:30 PM I ~ North I PHF= I 0.76 I Iji··l T~ ~ ',.-," '- '-', -Y( . ..... ....Ji>ild I PHF= I I 263 ~. 57 I 0.91 ",. ' '," "., .... "-" TOTAL I 1,235 --+ I 3,073 I .........-.- 1,258 I 1,456 .. .~,'. 1,315 I ... --þJ> I.:> I 0 ~ F 0 I 1,498 1.297 I , t r , ~"l PHF= I ,,' .'....:.... 0.97 I STEVENS CREEK ITIJ::II:J ~ SAICH I PHF= I ERR I TIME PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUNP EASTBOUND WESTBOUNP From To I Left Thru Right . Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TOTAL. I SUR VEY DA TA ! 0 34 56 254 0 . 0 16 . 624 04:00 PM -- 04: 15 PM 0 0 15 0 249 04: 15 PM --- 04:30 PM 0 0 0 35 0 62 117 530 0 0 527 26 /,297 04:30 PM -- 04:45 PM 0 0 0 49 0 104 189 835 0 0 829 34 2,040 04:45 PM -- 05 :00 PM 0 0 0 66 0 157 247 1,164 0 0 1,109 47 2,790 05:00 PM -- 05:15 PM 0 0 0 79 0 204 320 1.455 0 0 1,440 68 3,566 05:15 PM --- 05:30 PM 0 0 0 97 0 260 380 \,765 0 0 1,785 83 4,370 05:30PM -- 05:45 PM 0 0 0 119 0 323 434 2.049 0 0 2,03\ 100 5,056 05:45 PM TOT 06:00 PM . 0 0 0 . 135 0 370 495 2.352 0 0 2,363 120 5,835 I TOTAL BY PERIOD ! I 254 . , 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM 0 0 0 15 0 34 56 0 0 249 16 624 04:15 PM -- 04:30 PM 0 0 0 20 0 28 61 276 0 0 278 10 673 04:30 PM --- 04:45 PM 0 0 0 14 0 42 72 305 0 0 302 8 743 04:45 PM -- 05:00 PM 0 0 0 17 0 53 58 329 0 0 280 13 750 05:00 PM TOT 05:15 PM 0 0 0 13 0 47 73 291 0 0 331 21 776 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM 0 0 0 18 0 56 60 310 0 0 345 15 804 05:30 PM Tn 05:45 PM 0 0 0 22 0 63 54 284 0 0 246 17 686 05:45 PM 06:00 PM . 0 0 0 16 0 47 61 303 0 0 332 20 779 I HOURLY TOTALS ! I . , 04:00 PM TOT 05:00 PM 0 0 0 66 0 157 247 1,164 0 0 1,109 47 2,790 04:15 PM -- 05:15PM 0 0 0 64 0 170 264 1,201 0 0 1,191 52 2,942 04:30 PM -- 05:30 PM 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1.235 0 0 1,258 57 3,073 04:45 PM -- 05:45 PM 0 0 0 70 0 219 245 1,214 0 0 1,202 66 3,0/6 05:00 PM -- 06:00 PM . 0 0 0 . 69 0 213 248 1,188 0 0 1,254 73 3,045 I East Bay: (510) 232-1271 -. SF/Peninsula: (415) 750-1317 I ~ o - ) ó) - BA YMETRICS TRAFFIC RESOURCES INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY PROJECT: CUPERTINO TMC N-S Approach: STELLING E-W A roach: GREENLEAF SURVEY DATE: 10/6/2005 SURVEY TIME: 4:00 PM CITY: CUPERTINO DAY: THURSDAY TO 6:00 PM FILE: STGLCPPM PEAK HOUR I 04:45 PM I TO I 05:45 PM I ~ t ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE VOLUMES North I PHF~ I 0.92 I J" ...'¡. '~,. '"-.""".,.,,,-->."-'---,- "':"-'",- ,'-,",';, ,..........-",...-;.. ....,.. -,', -.,--.. ,':-"'-,.,-:':' ->;,..>.... :~:..: ;-:: -,',,:,;,:,,' '.-- -.'..', ~ 49 -Yf tL 44 ~ t 30 TOTAL ----J¡.. @ill .- 35 ~ .~ 36 ì t í PHF= it 0.91 89 , ~. 62 48 127 GREENLEAF ~ I PHF= I 0.46 I ~ STELLING I PHF= I 0.46 115 10 19 26 39 54 62 70 TIME PERIOD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Left Th."u Rí~ht. Left Thru Ri ht EASTBOUND Left Thru Right WESTBOUND Left Thru Right From To SURVEY DATA 04:00 PM 04:15PM 0 95 2 4 113 2 10 2 3 5 5 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 2 211 2 7 243 6 18 5 13 12 13 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 3 320 3 12 405 9 25 10 21 22 20 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 5 462 4 22 589 19 37 18 36 28 32 05:00 PM 05:15PM 5 567 7 25 812 26 53 22 47 36 39 05: 15 PM 05:30PM 9 700 10 33 996 41 62 33 55 49 49 05:30 PM 05:45 PM II 841 12 35 1,192 55 74 40 69 58 55 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 13 966 15 39 1,377 65 88 49 76 64 63 TOTAL BY PERIOD ---- 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 0 95 2 4 113 2 10 2 3 5 5 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 2 116 0 3 130 4 8 3 10 7 8 04:30 PM 04:45 PM I 109 I 5 162 3 7 5 8 10 7 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 2 142 I 10 184 10 12 8 15 6 12 05:00 PM 05: 15 PM 0 105 3 3 223 7 16 4 II 8 7 05:15PM 05:30 PM 4 133 3 8 184 15 9 II 8 13 10 05:30PM 05:45 PM 2 141 2 2 196 14 12 7 14 9 6 05:45 PM 06:00 PM , 2 125 3 4 185 10 14 9 7 6 8 HOURLY TOTALS --;-- 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 5 462 4 22 589 19 37 18 36 28 32 04: 15 PM 05:15 PM 5 472 5 21 699 24 43 20 44 31 34 04:30 PM 05:30 PM 7 489 8 26 753 35 44 28 42 37 36 04:45PM 05:45 PM 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 8 504 11 17 788 46 51 31 40 36 31 East Bay: (510) 232-1271 SF/Peninsula: (415) 750-1317 10 25/ 9 300 7 325 13 4/5 15 402 8 4U6 8 4/3 13 386 ç; /,29/ ~ - 39 \ 44 1,442 óJ 43 1,548 - 44 1,636 44 /,607 Approved Trips Inventory l <D-lOf:J Greenleaf Stevens 44 APPROVED TRIPS INVENTORY (1) PM PEAK HOUR #0012 10-24-05 "CJ a:: 7 8 r. >. ~ ~~;'.{-~t~ 6* 26-----> 18-¡ ~ Î r (J)I~I~I 0> C Qj ..... (f) z o N C « Q) a Rd. LEGEND: o Critical Intersections * CMP Intersection (1) Source: City of Cupertino ! -.- t Ivd. 1iI~q,.E_F¡¡R¡W~ lß-loq Level of Service Descriptions \ß'- \to Level of Service Descriptions (Signalized Intersections) . Average LOS Control Delay VIC Ratio , Description (Seconds) A S 10.0 < 0.600 Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression an lor short cycle lengths. B+ 10.1 - 12.0 Operations with low delay occurring with good B 12.1 - 18.0 0.600-0.699 progression and/or short cycle lengths. B- 18.1-20.0 C+ 20.1 - 23.0 Operations with average delays resulting from fair C 23.1 - 32.0 0.700-0.799 progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual c- 32.1 - 35.0 cycle failures begin to appear. D+ 35.1 - 39.0 Operations with longer delays due to a D 39.1-51.0 0.800-0.899 combination of unfavorable progression, long cycl¡ D- 51.1 - 55.0 lengths, and high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E+ 55.1-60.0 Operations with high delays values indicating poor E 60.1 - 75.0 0.900-0.999 progression, long cycle lengths, and high VIC E- 75.1 - 80.0 ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F >80.0 ~ 1.00 Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. Notes: LOS: Level of Service V IC: Volume to Capacity Ratio Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000 ~~~n~R~~~.~hE~Æt,Æ!fJ tB- UI Level of Service Calculations l ß-\\"2., COMPARE Man OcI1715:50:52 2005 Page 3-13 SR 85 W. Ramp Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R _______n_n 1 nnn_nnnn II nn_n________II_______________11 _____nnn_n_1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 29 Sep 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 854 0 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 854 0 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 854 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 854 0 PCE Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 LOO 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1\00 1.00 Final Vol., 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 ~54 0 ____________I____________n_II___nnnnnn II nnn_nnn__II_nnnnn_n_1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 Lanes, 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.03 0.97 2.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat., 0 0 0 4938 12 1750 0 5742 1755 3150 3800 0 _________n_I_______n__n__II_n____n__nn II nn_______n__II__________nn_1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.44 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: Green Time: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: AdjDel/Veh: HCM2kAvg: Clly of Cupertino CMP 2004 . Existing PM Peak Hour level Of Service Complrtatlon Report 2000 HCM Operallons (Base Volume AJtemallve) EJdsllng(PM) Intersection #219: SRB5 W Ramps/Stevens Creek Blvd 1642-219 {(CM? 2004)] Signsl=SpIiVRighls=lnclude Final Vol: 777"· 3 1267 lanes: 1 0 0 1 2 ~ 4 t ~ ~ Signal=Prolect Slgnal=Profecl Final Vol: lanes: Righls=Jnclude VolCnlDale: 912912004 Righls=tnclude lanes: FlnalVot: j- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 0"· 0 0 0 ~ loss Time (see): . J- 0 0 841 3 --.. CriUcalVlC: 0.728 -+- 2 654·'· r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 27.4 r 0 257 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 27.1 2 181 LOS; C ~ ~ t ~ ~ lanes: Flnal,Vol: o 0 0 0 0 000 Signal=SpliVRighls,.lnclude "Street Name: Approach: Movement: **** **** 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 10.3 0.61 51. 8 1.00 51. 8 4 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 67.1 0.42 11.4 1. 00 11.4 8 67.1 0.42 11.4 1. 00 11.4 8 67.1 0.73 17.6 1.00 17.6 19 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 23.7 0.68 40.9 1. 00 40.9 10 23.7 0.68 40.9 1. 00 40.9 9 **** 33.9 0.73 36.3 1. 00 36.3 14 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o TM"'~77n".<: r.nn....inhll...\ ?nn"! nn....inn A....",..i..'.... In.. l tb- I t~ 11"-""'....... In PANf.I ::Nf.lIN~I=R~ INr: COMPARE Sal Oct 22 00:16:40 2005 Page 3-11 Street Name: SR 85 W. Ramp Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1-----------"---11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green, 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 29 Sep 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 854 0 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 841 257 181 854 0 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 24 0 Initial Fut, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 885 257 181 878 0 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 885 257 181 878 0 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 885 257 181 878 0 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.' 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 885 257 181 878 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 Lanes, 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.06 0.94 2.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.' 0 0 0 4938 12 1750 0 5809 1687 3150 3800 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.44 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: Green Time: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh, User DelAdj: AdjDel/Veh: HCM2kAvg' Clf)' 01 Cupertloo CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM OperatlOf1s (Future Volume Allernative) Background (PM) Intersection #219: SR8S W Remps/Stevens Creek Blvd 1642-219 [(CMP 2004)] Slgnal=SpIlVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 777··· 3 1267 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 2 ~ -4 t ~ ~ Signai";Protect Slgnalsprotect Final Vol: Lanes: Rlghts=lnclude Vol Cnt Dete: 9/2912004 Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle TIme (see): 110 -t. 0"· 0 0 0 -\. Loss TIme (sec): 9 J- 0 0 68' 3 -JIo- CrIUcaIVlC: 0.735 +- 2 878'" =( Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 27.7 r 0 257 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 27.4 2 161 LOS: C ~ ~ t fÞ- ~ Lanes: Final Vol: o 0 0 0 0 000 Slgnal=SpliVAlghts=lnclude **** **** 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 66.4 0.74 18.2 1.00 18.2 19 10.2 0.62 52.1 1.00 52.1 4 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 24.4 0.69 40.5 1. 00 40.5 10 24.4 0.69 40.5 1. 00 40.5 10 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 66.4 0.42 11.7 1. 00 11. 7 8 66.4 0.42 11.7 1. 00 11.7 8 **** 34.6 0.74 36.1 1. 00 36.1 14 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o l~-'l4 ~ ... -~~~.~ .....__...._ht ,~\ ..."".. n..-..Aln... .............1....... In.. 11<"-"m'M In PANA FNr,LNFFR~ INf:: COMPARE Sat OCl22 22:41:18 2005 Page 3-6 SR 85 W. Ramp Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 29 Sep 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol: 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 885 257 181 878 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1267 3 777 0 885 257 181 878 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W/PROJECT: 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 27 0 15 22 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1285 3 777 0 912 ,257 196 900 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1285 3 777 0 912 257 196 900 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1285 3 777 0 912 257 196 900 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1285 3 777 0 912 257 196 900 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.08 0.92 2.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4938 12 1750 05848 1648 31503800 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.44 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.24 0.00 Crit Moves: Green Time: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: AdjDel/Veh: HCM2kAvg: City 01 Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Proect(PM) Intersection #219: SRSS W Ramps/Stevens Creek Blvd 1642-219 [(CMP 2004)] Signal=SpIiVRighls",lnclude FinarVol: n7"· 3 1285 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 2 ~ 4 t ~ ~ Signal=Protect Slgnal=Prolect Final Vol: lanes: Rights=lnctude Vol Cnt Dale: 9/2912004 RighlÞlnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j< Cycle TIme (see): 110 't. 0·" 0 0 0 ~ Loss TIme (see): 9 J- 0 0 912 3 -JI>- GriliealVlC: 0.742 +- 2 900'" r Avg Grit Del (seclveh): 28.0 r 0 257 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 27.7 2 196 LOS: C ~ +t t ~ ~ Lanes: Final Vol: o 0 0 0 0 000 Slgnal:SplltJAlghts=lnelude Street Name: Approach: Movement: **** **** 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 25.0 0.69 40.2 1.00 40.2 10 10.2 0.67 54.3 1.00 54.3 5 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 65.9 0.43 12.1 1. 00 12.1 8 65.9 0.43 12.1 1. 00 12.1 9 65.9 0.74 18.8 1. 00 18.8 20 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 25.0 0.69 40.2 1. 00 40.2 10 **** 35.1 0.74 35.9 1. 00 35.9 15 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 1~-1l6 T...H;v'17nO::1O:: ('.onvrinht /r:) ~003 Dowllno Assoclatea. Ine. Ucensed to PANG ENGlNEERS.ING. COMPARE Mon Oct 17 15:50:522005 Page 3-15 Street Name:SR 85 E. Ramp De Anza Campus Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11------------------------------1---------------I Min. Green, 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ____________1_______________11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 28 Sep 2004 « S:00-6:00PM Base Vol, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1594 0 0 775 837 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1594 0 0 775 837 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1594 0 0 775 0 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1594 0 0 775 0 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Vol. , 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1594 0 0 775 0 ____________I____u_________II_______________II---------------II---------__u--1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.99 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes, 0.53 0.02 1.45 0.65 1.35 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.' 936 28 2536 1176 2523 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750 ___u_______I_______________II_______________II-uu-----~----II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.16 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 42.8 42.8 Volume/Cap, 0.73 0.73 Oelay/Veh, 31.5 31.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh, 31.5 31.5 HCM2kAvg' 15' 15 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 . Existing PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Base Volume AhemaUve) Existing (PM) Intersection #220: SR 85 E Ramps/Stevens Creek Blvd 1643·220 [CM? 2004 - Existing] Slgnal..SpIlURights=lnclude Final Vol: 0 221"· 103 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 ~ -4 ... .þ. ~ Signal=Protect Slgnal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Aights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 912912004 Rights=lgnore Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle TIme (see): 110 ~ 515··· 2 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 9 .t- O 0 1594 3 --- CrIUcaIVlC: 0.731 .....- 3 775"· 0 T Avg Cril Del (secJveh): 41.6 T 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 35.1 0 0 LOS: D+ ~ ~ t ~ rJÞ- Lanes: Final Vol: o 0 11 0 1 266 am 447 Slgnal:>5pliURights=lnclude **** **** 42.8 0.45 25.1 1. 00 25.1 8 13 .2 0.73 52.8 1. 00 52.8 7 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 24.6 0.73 43.6 1.00 43.6 10 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 45.1 0.68 27.5 1. 00 27.5 15 13 .2 0.73 52.8 1. 00 52.8 7 **** 20.5 0.73 44.8 1. 00 44.8 10 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o I e> -"\ I (¡¡ Tr<lHf..770."i1.':¡ Coovrlaht (e) 2003 Dowllno AssocIates. Inc. Ucensad to PANG ENGINEERS. INC. COMPARE Sal Oel22 00:16:40 2005 Page 3-13 Street Name:SR 85 E. Ramp De Anza Campus Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ----u------I---------------II-------u-n--- 1 I-------n------I 1---------------1 Min. Green, 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11___________----I Volume Module: » Count Date: 28 Sep 2004 « 5:00-6:00PM Base Vol, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515'1594 0 0 775 837 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1594 0 0 775 837 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 24 0 Initial Fut, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1638 0 0 799 837 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume, 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1638 0 0 799 0 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1638 0 0 799 0 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 Final Vol.: 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1638 0 0 799 0 ------------ I--u-----------II _______________11_______________11_______________ I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.99 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes, 0.53 0.02 1.45 0.65 1.35 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.' 936 28 2536 11762523 0 31505700 0 0 5700 1750 ____________1 ---------------1 1---------------1 I----------u---I1 _______n______ I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.16 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 42.5 42.5 Volume/Cap, 0.74 0.74 Delay/Veh: 31.9 31.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh, 31.9 31.9 HCM2kAvg, 16 16 CIty of Cuper1ino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Compulallon Report 2000 HCM Operallons (Future Volume Allemalive) Background (PM) Intersection #220: SR 85 E Ramps/Slevens Creek Blvd 1643-220 (CMP 2004 - Existing] Signal..SplltlAights=lnclude Final Vol: 0 221·" 103 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 ..-J 4 + .þ. ~ Signal;'Prol9C1 Signal..Protect Final Vol; lanes: Rights=lneluda VolCrltDale; 9/2812004 Alghts..lgnore lanes: FInal Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 515"· 2 0 -t Loss Time (see): . J.- 0 0 163. 3 -þJ- CrltieaIV/C: 0.736 ...- 3 799·" 0 r Avg eril Del (sedveh): 41.7 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (secJveh): 35.2 0 0 LOS; D+ ~ ~ t ~ ~ lanes: Final Vol: o 0 11 0 1 266 S·" 447 Signal=SpiitlAights=lnclude **** **** 42.5 0.46 25.3 1.00 25.3 8 13 .1 0.74 53.2 1.00 53.2 7 24.4 0.74 43.9 1.00 43.9 10 45.4 0.70 27.5 1.00 27.5 16 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 13.1 0.74 53.2 1.00 53.2 7 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o **** 21. 0 0.74 44.6 1. 00 44.6 10 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o \~ ~\ t7 .. -...- -..-...---- ...- COMPARE Mon Oct 24 09:26:46 2005 Page 3-7 85 E. Ramp De Anza Campus Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11 ,--------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 28 Sep 2004 « 5:00-6:00 PM Base Vol: 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1638 0 0 799 837 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 266 8 447 103 221 0 515 1638 0 0 799 837 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W/PROJECT: 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 37 15 Initial Fut: 266 8 465 103 221 0 515 1683 0 0 836 852 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 266 8 465 103 221 0 515 1683 0 0 836 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 266 8 465 103 221 0 515 1683 0 0 836 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 0.00 Final Vol.: 266 8 465 103 221 0 5151683 0 0 836 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.99 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.52 0.02 1.46 0.65 1.35 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 919 28 2553 1176 2523 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.16 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 42.5 42.5 Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.75 De1ay/Veh: 32.3 32.3 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 32.3 32.3 HCM2kAvg: 16 16 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Altemallve) Project (PM) Intersection #220: SR 85 E Ramps/Stevens Creek Blvd 1643-220 [CMP20d4] Slgnal=SplltJRights=lnclude Final Vol: 0 221'" 103 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 ~ 4 .¡. .þ. ~ Signal..Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Alghls:lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 9/2812004 RIghts=lgnore Lanes: Final Vol: ..f Cycte Time (see): 110 ~ 515'- 2 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 9 J.- 0 0 1683 , ----... CrJlicaIVlC: 0.748 ..- , 836'" 0 =f Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 42.1 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 35.' 0 0 LOS: 0+ ~ ~ t ~ rÞ" Lanes: Final Vol: o 0 11 0 1 266 S'" 465 Signal=SpUVRlghts=include Street Name:SR Approach: Movemen t : **** **** 42.5 0.47 25.5 1.00 25.5 8 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 45.6 0.71 27.8 1. 00 27.8 17 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 12.9 0.75 54.1 1.00 54.1 7 12.9 0.75 54.1 1. 00 54.1 7 24.0 0.75 44.7 1.00 44.7 10 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o **** 21. 6 0.75 44.5 1.00 44.5 10 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o I~-\\'b . .." _~_~ ........__ "__H'_'" .__ .'.__u..................,................. ,..... COMPARE Moo Oct 17 15:50;522005 City 01 Cupertino CUP 2004 - Existing PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Base Volume Allemallve) Exlsllng (PM) Page3-1 Intersection #3: Mary Avenue I Stevens Creek Blvd. Final Vol: Lanes: Slgnal=Prolect/Righls=lnclude 144 61 247·" -.J'4 ¡ .}..'~ Signal=Prolect Slgnal=Protect FlnatVol: Lanes; Righls-olnctude Vol Cnt Date: 101612005 Rlghls=Jnclude Lanes: Final Vol:. -.f Cycle Time (S9C): 110 ~ 22' 0 20S ~ loss Time (see): '2 J.- 0 1111·" 2 --.... CritlcaIVIC: 0.656 +- 2 915 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 35.3 r 0 30' 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 34.3 292··· lOS: c· ~ ~ t ~ ~ Anza Campus Mary Avenue Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ____________I_____u________II_______________llu_______n____II____u______---I Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 5:00-6:00 PM Base Vol: 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 ------------1---------------1 I-----u--------I I-----u--------I 1--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 0.55 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.33 0.67 1.00 2.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 3150 986 814 1750 1900 1750 1750 4395 1203 1750 4574 1025 ------------I---------------II---------------II----u---------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.17 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 13.6 10.0 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.26 Oelay/Veh: 46.8 47.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 46.8 47.4 HCM2kAvg: 4 2 lanes: Final Vol: 2 0 0 0 210 23·" 19 Signal=ProtecVAights=lnclude Street Name:De Approach: Movemen t : **** **** 10.0 0.26 47.4 .1.00 47.4 2 22.1 0.70 47.0 1.00 47.0 9 18.5 0.49 42.7 1. 00 42.7 5 25.5 0.55 38.7 1. 00 38.7 7 39.7 0.70 31.2 1.00 31.2 15 18.5 0.19 39.6 1.00 39.6 2 39.7 0.70 31.2 1. 00 31.2 14 **** 26.2 0.70 43.6 1. 00 43.6 10 40.4 0.55 27.9 1. 00 27.9 10 40.4 0.55 27.9 1. 00 27.9 10 \ß-\Iq Trafflx7.7.0515 Copyright (c) 2003 Dowling Associates, Inc. Ucensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Sat Oct 22 00:16;40 2005 Page 3· 1 City of Cupertino CMP2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM OperaUons (Future Volume Alternative) Background (PM) Intersection #3: Mary Avenue I Stevens Creek Blvd. Slgnal,.Prolect Slgnal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes; Rlghls=lnclude Vol Cnl Date; 10/612005 Rights-Include Lanes; FJnalVol; J- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 221 0 20S -t Loss Timl¡l (see); 12 .t- O 1 1155·" 2 -.. CrilicalVIC: 0.664 ...- 2 93. r Avg Crit Del (sec/vah); 35.3 r 0 304 0 Avg Detay (secJveh): 34.2 292"· LOS: C· ~ ~ t ~ ~ Slgnal..ProtecVAlghts..lnclude Final Vol: 144 61 247··· Lanes; 10101 ..v4+.þ.~ Lanes: 2 0 0 0 Final Vol: 210 23··· 19 Signal=ProleeIlRights=lnclude Street Name:De Anza Campus Mary Avenue Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green, 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 5:00-6:00 PM Base Vol, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1111 304 292 915 205 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 24 0 Initial Fut, 210 23 19 247 61 144' "221 1155 304 292 939 205 User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1155 304 292 939 205 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1155 304 292 939 205 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.' 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1155 304 292 939 205 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes, 2.00 0.55 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.35 0.65 1.00 2.44 0.56 Final Sat.' 3150 986 814 17501900 1750 1750 4432 1166 17504595 1003 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 13.5 10.0 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.26 Delay/Veh, 47.0 47.4 User OelAdj, 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh, 47.0 47.4 HCM2kAvg: 4 2 **** **** **** 10.0 0.26 47.4 1. 00 47.4 2 21. 8 0.71 47.9 1.00 47.9 9 18.4 0.19 39.7 1. 00 39.7 2 18.4 0.49 42.9 1. 00 42.9 5 25.3 0.55 39.0 1. 00 39.0 7 40.3 0.71 31.0 1. 00 31. 0 15 40.3 0.71 31.0 1. 00 31.0 15 25.8 0.71 44.4 1.00 44.4 10 40.9 0.55 27.6 1. 00 27.6 10 40.9 . 0.55 27.6 1.00 27.6 10 lß-\ZO Traffx 7.7.0515 Copyright (c) 2003 Dowling Associates, Inc. Ucensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Sat Ocl22 00:16:40 2005 Page 3-2 Clly 01 Cupertino CMP2004 PM Peak Hour Lavel Of Service CompUlalion Report 2000 HCM Operations (Fulure Volume AUemaliva) Proacl(PM) Intersection #3: Mary Avenue / Stevens Creek Blvd. Signal=ProlacVRighls=lnclude Final Vol: 144 61 247·" Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 -.J4'¡'.þ.~ Slgnal';'Protect Slgnat=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rlghls-lnclude Vol CoI Dale: 101612005 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ..f Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 221 0 205 ~ Loss TIme (see): 12 J.- 0 1218"· 2 -.. CrillcalV/C: 0.677 +-- 2 991 r Avg Grit Del (seclveh): 37.3 T 0 30' 0 Avg Dalay (seclveh): 36.0 292··· LOS: 0+ ~ ~ t ~ r+ Anza Campus Mary Avenue Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green, 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 5:00-6:00 PM Base Vol, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1155 304 292 939 205 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1155 304 292 939 205 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WITH PROJEC, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 52 0 Initial Fut, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1218 304 292 991 205 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1218 304 292 991 205 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1218 304 292 991 205 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 210 23 19 247 61 144 221 1218 304 292 991 205 ____________I_hnnn__n__II________n___n II-nn--------h II nnnnn_uu 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes, 2.00 0.55 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.38 0.62 1.00 2.47 0.53 Final Sat.' 3150 986 814 1750 1900 1750 1750 4480 1118 1750 4639 960 _________h_1 __h__nn_____11 uu________u_I'1 u___________n II--------h--n-I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.03 0.08 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.17 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 13.3 10.0 Volume/Cap, 0.55 0.26 De1ay/Veh, 51.2 50.3 User De1Adj, 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh, 51.2 50.3 HCM2kAvg, 4 2 Lanes: 2 0 0 0 Final Vol: 210 23"· 19 Slgnal=ProtectlRights=lnclude Street Name:De Approach: Movemen t : **** **** 10.0 0.26 50.3 1.00 50.3 2 21.4 0.72 54.2 1.00 54.2 9 18.1 0.19 41. 0 1. 00 41. 0 2 18.1 0.50 47.9 1.00 47.9 5 24.7 0.56 43.5 1.00 43.5 7 41.3 0.72 31.7 1. 00 31.7 16 **** 41.3 0.72 31.7 1. 00 31.7 15 25.3 0.72 49.9 1. 00 49..9 11 41. 8 0.56 27.9 1. 00 27.9 11 41.8 0.56 27.9 1. 00 27.9 10 l~- ILl T.~f¥77n<::.<:: {""""rlnhll...1 ?nn<t nnwllnn A....n.-I..I.... Inn I 1r..m",Att In PANr" FNr"INFFRS. INC COMPARE Mon Oct 17 15:50:52 2005 Page:J.11 Stelling Road Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11___------------1 Min. Green, 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ____________\_______________11_______________11_______________11__._____________1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 ____________ 1 _______________11_______________11 _______________11_______________1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes, 1.00 1.07 0.93 1.00 1.35 0.65 1.00 2.25 0.75 2.00 2.42 0.58 Final Sat., 1750 2024 1674 17502528 1171 17504251 1346 31504554 1044 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 18.4 Volume/Cap: 0.81 Delay/Veh: 66.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/veh, 66.2 HCM2kAvg' 10 City of Cupertino CUP 2004· existing PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Base Volume Allernatlve) existing (PM) Intersection #217: Stevens Creek Blvd/Stelling Rd 1613-217 [CMP 2004] Slgnal=ProtecVRlghls=lnclude Final Vol: 271 585'" 276 Lanes: 0 1 1 0 1 ~ 4 . ~ '-J,. Slgnal=Protect Slgnal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 1012112004 Aighls..lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ..f Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 310·" 0 208 ~ Loss Time (see): 12 J- 0 862 2 -... Critical V/C: 0.614 ~ 2 907·" r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 49.1 1= 0 273 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 46.6 2 563 LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 1 0 Final Vol: 219'- 301 24' Slgnal=ProtectlR¡ghl~nclude Street Name: Approach: Movement: **** **** 25.5 0.70 46.5 1.00 46.5 11 25.5 0.70 46.5 1. 00 46.5 10 27.0 0.70 48.3 1. 00 48.3 11 34.1 0.81 45.0 1. 00 45.0 17 34.1 0.81 45.0 1.00 45.0 16 26.1 0.81 57.3 1.00 57.3 13 29.5 0.83 47.1 1. 00 47.1 16 29.5 0.83 47.1 1.00 47.1 15 26.0 0.83 53.0 1. 00 53.0 12 **** 29.3 0.81 46.6 1. 00 46.6 15 29.3 0.81 46.6 1.00 46.6 15 TraJlix7.7.0515 Copyrlghl (c) 2003 Dowling Associates, Inc. lß-l2-1- Ucensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Sat Oct 22 00;16;40 2005 Page3-9 Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R -----------cl---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 862 273 563 907 208 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 24 0 Initial Fut: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 __n_n_____1 nnU_____nn 11_____nnnn__II__________nn_II______n_nnn I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.07 0.93 1.00 1.35 0.65 1.00 2.28 0.72 2.00 2.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1750 2024 1674 1750 2528 1171 1750 4302 1296 3150 4576 1022 n____nnn I---n--------n 1 1______nnn___1 1 n_____n______11 n_U____nnn 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 18.1 Volume/Cap: 0.83 Delay/Veh: 68.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.6 HCM2kAvg: 10 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service ComputatIon Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background (PM) Intersection #217: Stevens Creek Blvd/Stelling Rd 1613-217 [CMP 20041 Slgnal",ProtectlRights=lnclude Final Vol: 271 565'" 276 Lanes: 0 1 1 0 1 ~ ...{ t ~ I...,. Slgnal;'Protect Signal=Protec! Final Vol: Lanes: Rlghts=lnclude Vol Cnt Date; 1012112004 Alghts..lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j< Cycle Time (see); 120 -t. 310 0 206 ~ Loss Time (see): 12 .t- O 9060.. 2 -Jt>- Critical VlC: 0.829 +- 2 931 =r Avg Crlt Del (seclveh): 49.5 r 0 273 0 Avg Delay (secJveh): 48.9 2 563'" LOS; 0 ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 Final Vol: 2190.. 301 24" Signal=ProtectIRlghts=lnclude **** **** **** 25.1 0.71 47.3 1.00 47.3 11 26.6 0.71 49.3 1.00 49.3 11 26.2 0.81 56.7 1.00 56.7 13 30.5 0.83 46.5 1.00 46.5 15 25.9 0.83 53.3 1. 00 53.3 12 33.5 0.83 46.3 1.00 46.3 17 33.5 0.83 46.3 1.00 46.3 17 30.5 0.83 46.5 1.00 46.5 16 25.1 0.71 47.3 1. 00 47.3 10 30.1 0.81 45.9 1. 00 45.9 15 30.1 0.81 45.9 1.00 45.9 15 \ß-\23 _..~. '-, ~""~ .._..~,__ .u__._.__ .__ . 'A___~"'_ ......... .....,....,.,............... ...... COMPARE Men Oct 24 09:18:37 2005 Page 3-5 Clly 01 Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Altemallve) Project (PM) Intersection #217: Stevens Creek Blvd/Stelling Rd 1613-217 [CMP 2004] Slgnal=ProlecllRlghls=lnelude Final Vol: 271 60ru S02 Lanes: 0 1 1 0 1 ~ 4 t .þ. ~ Slgnal=Prolect Slgnal=Prolecl Final Vol: Lanes: Alghts=lnc!ude Vol Cnt Dale: 1012112004 Alghls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 3730.. 0 208 ~ Loss Time (see): 12 J.- 0 808 2 ----. Critical V/C: 0.876 +- 2 9830.. r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 54.3 r 0 273 0 Avg Delay (seclveh); 52.5 2 616 LOS; o· ~ ~ t ~ rÞ" lanes: 1 0 0 FinalVol:- 219"· 364 24. Slgnal=ProteellRlghls=lnelude Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0 __________"_1_______________1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol: 219 301 249 276 5B5 271 310 906 273 563 931 20B Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 20B Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WITH PROJEC: 0 63 0 26 22 0 63 0 0 53 52 0 Initial Fut: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 9B3 20B User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 9B3 20B Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 9B3 20B PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1~00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 9B3 20B nn__nnn In-_n_nn_n_11 n___n_n_n__II___n_n~____n II--n----nn---I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.B3 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.17 0.B3 1.00 1.37 0.63 1.00 2.2B 0.72 2.00 2.46 0.54 Final Sat.: 17502196 1502 1750 2557 1142 17504302 1296 31504621 97B ___n_nnn 1----h-n-n___11 nnn_n_n___11 nn_____n__n II n_n_nnn___ 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 17.1 Volume/Cap: O.BB Delay/Veh: 77.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 77.7 HCM2kAvg: 11 **** **** 24.3 0.B2 52.7 1.00 52.7 13 24.3 0.B2 52.7 1. 00 52.7 13 25.3 0.B2 58.4 1. 00 5B.4 13 32.5 0.B8 50.6 1. 00 50.6 19 32.5 0.8B 50.6 1. 00 50.6 1B 29.2 0.8B 61. 7 1.00 61. 7 16 30.3 0.B4 47.0 1.00 47.0 16 30.3 0.B4 47.0 1.00 47.0 16 2B.1 0.B4 52.0 1. 00 52.0 13 **** 29.1 O.BB 50.4 1.00 50.4 17 29.1 O.BB 50.4 1.00 50.4 17 lð- 12..1 .. -...- -..-...---- ...- COMPARE Mon Oct 24 21:46:15 2005 PSQe3-1 street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green, 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WITH PROJEC, 0 63 0 26 22 0 63 0 0 53 52 0 Initial Fut, 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 6.16 983 208 ------------1---------------1 I-------c-------I 1---------------1 1- --------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes, 1.00 1.17 0.83 1.00 1.37 0.63 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.46 0.54 Final Sat.' 17502196 1502 17502557 1142 1750 5700 1750 31504621 978 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 17.1 Volume/Cap: 0.88 De1ay/Veh, 77.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh, 77.7 HCM2kAvg' 11 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Altemallve) Project (PM) Intersection #217, Stevens Creek Blvd/Stelling Rd 1613·217 [CMP 2004 w/ IMP (All. 1)] Signal,.ProlecllRlghls=lnclude Final Vol: 271 607"· 302 Lanes: 0 1 1 0 1 .,.J 4 ... .þ. ~ Signal=Protecl Slgnal..Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol-cntDale: 1012112004 Rights..lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 373'" 0 20. ~ Loss TIme (see): 12 ~ 0 1 906 , ---.... CriticalV/C: 0.676 ..- 2 983'- 0 r AvgCrit Del (seclV9h): 54.3 r 0 '" Avg Delay (secJveh): 51.4 2 616 LOS: D· ~ ~ t ~ rJo. Lanes: 1 0 0 Final Vol: 219'" 364 249 Signal=ProlecllRlghls=lnclude **** **** 24.3 0.82 52.7 1.00 52.7 13 25.3 0.82 58.4 1. 00 58.4 13 32.5 0.88 50.6 1. 00 50.6 19 32.5 0.88 50.6 1.00 50.6 18 29.2 0.88 61.7 1.00 61.7 16 26.2 0.73 45.9 1. 00 45.9 12 26.2 0.72 49.8 1. 00 49.8 11 24.3 0.82 52.7 1.0Ò 52.7 13 32 .2 0.73 43.2 1.00 43.2 12 **** 29.1 0.88 50.4 1. 00 50.4 17 29.1 0.88 50.4 1.00 50.4 17 l ß - \ '2..~ Trallix7.7.0515 Copvrlohl Ie} 2003 Dowlinø Associates, 100. licensed 10 PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Mon Oct 24 21:46;15 2005 Page 3-2 Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------[ Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WITH PROJEC: 0 63 0 26 22 0 63 0 0 53 52 0 Initial Fut: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00· 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.17 0.83 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.28 0.72 2.00 2.46 0.54 Final Sat.: 1750 2196 1502 1750 3800 1750 1750 4302 1296 3150 4621 978 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 21.0 23.4 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.85 De1ay/Veh: 54.5 55.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 54.5 55.9 HCM2kAvg: 9 14 City 01 Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) proJecl:(PM) Intersection #2172: Stavens Creek Blvd/Stelling Rd 1613-217 [CMP 2004 w/IMP (All. 2)] SJgnal=ProtectJRights..lnclude Final Vol: 271 607 302"· lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ~ 4 . .þ. ~ Slgnal",Protecl Slgnal_Prolect Final Vol: lanes: Righls>=lnclude Vol CrltDate; 1012112004 Rights..lnclude lanes; Final Vol: J. Cycle Time (see); 120 ~ 373'" 0 208 ~ loss Time (sec); 12 J-- 0 908 2 -. CrIUcaIVlC: 0.849 1- 2 963·'· --r Avg Crit Del (seclveh); 53.2 T 0 27' 0 Avg Delay (seclveh); 50.0 2 616 LOS: 0 ~ ~ t ~ ~ lanes: 1 0 0 FinatVol; 219 364""'· 249 Signal=ProleellRights=lnclude **** **** 23.4 0.85 55.9 1. 00 55.9 13 24.4 0.85 63.3 1.00 63.3 13 26.8 0.69 48.1 1. 00 48.1 10 30.1 0.85 57.2 1.00 57.2 16 31.2 0.81 45.1 1. 00 45.1 16 31.2 0.81 45.1 1.00 45.1 15 26.8 0.71 46.0 1. 00 46.0 12 29.0 0.81 49.4 1.00 49.4 13 **** 30.1 0.85 47.9 1. 00 47.9 17 30.1 0.85 47.9 1.00 47.9 16 l6~ \z.{Q T,..fflv77 n.<:;1<; Copyright (c) 2003 Dowling Associates, Inc. Ucensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Mon Oct 24 21:46:15 2005 Page 3-3 Stelling Road Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green, 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0 ------------ 1 _______________11_______________11_______________11_______________1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:30-6:30 PM Base Vol, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 219 301 249 276 585 271 310 906 273 563 931 208 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WITH PROJEC, 0 63 0 26. 22 0 63 0 0 53 52 0 Initial Fut, 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 219 364 249 302 607 271 373 906 273 616 983 208 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes, 1.00 1.17 0.83 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.46 0.54 Final Sat.' 1750 2196 1502 1750 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4621 978 ____________1 _______________11_______________11 _______________11_______________1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 21.0 23.4 Volume/Cap, 0.71 0.85 Delay/Veh, 54.5 55.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh, 54.5 55.9 HCM2kAvg, 9 14 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Oparatlons (Future Volume Ahemative) Project (PM) Intersection #2173, Stevens Creek Blvd/Stelling Rd 1613-217 tCMP 2004 wi IMP (All. 3)] Slgnal=Prolecl/Rlghts=lnclude FInal Vol: 271 607 302"· Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ~ 4 .¡. .þ. ~ Signal=Protect Slgnal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Rlghts..lnclude Vol GrIt Dale: 1012112004 Rlghls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 3730.. 0 2<>. ~ Loss Time (see): 12 ~ 0 906 3 -+ CrltlcalVlC: 0.849 ..-. 2 983"· 0 r Avg CrilDel (seclveh): 53.2 1= 0 273 Avg Delay (seclveh): 49.1 2 916 LOS: 0 ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: FInal Vol: 1 0 0 219 364·" 249 Signal=ProtecI/Rights..lnclude Street Name: Approach: Movemen t : **** **** 23.4 0.85 55.9 1. 00 55.9 13 27.0 0.71 44.7 1. 00 44.7 11 27.0 0.69 48.0 1. 00 48.0 10 24.4 0.85 63.3 1. 00 63.3 13 26.8 0.71 46.0 1. 00 46.0 12 26.8 0.69 48.1 1. 00 48.1 10 30.1 0.85 57.2 1. 00 57.2 16 33.2 0.71 41.7 1.00 41.7 11 **** 30.1 0.85 47.9 1. 00 47.9 17 30.1 0.85 47.9 1. 00 47.9 16 15 -I'Ll Traftlx 7.7.0515 Copyright (0) 2003 Dowling Assoclales, loe. Licensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Tue Oct 11:110:55:56 2005 Page 3· 2 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 - existIng PM Peak Hour level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM OperatIons (Base Volume AllemaUve) Exlsllng(PM) Intersecti,on #5: Saich Way I Stevens Creek Blvd. Signal=ProtectlRight8=lnclude Final Vol: 198....· 0 62 lanes: 10001 ~4t~~ Slgnal",Prolect SlgnaJ",Protecl FinelVol: Lanes: Rlghts..lnclude Vol Cnt Date; 10/612005 Rlghts=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (sec): 110 ~ 263'" 0 57 ~ Loss Time (see): 9 .t- O 1 1235 3 -... CrIUcalV/C: 0.543 .- 2 1258'" 0 r Avg Crit 091 (secJveh): 27.0 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 18.7 0 0 LOS: B· ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes; 00000 Final Vol; 0 0 0 Slgnal=ProtecVRlghls=lnclude Street Name: Saich Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 [---------------11---------------11--------------- [ Min. Green, 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 4:30-5:30 PM Base Vol: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11___________---- [ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.87 0.13 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 1750 5700 0 0 5357 243 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.11 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 crit Moves: Green Time: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DÉÜAdj: AdjDel/Veh: HCM2kAvg: **** **** 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o **** 47.6 0.54 23.4 1. 00 23.4 11 47.6 0.54 23.4 1.00 23.4 11 lB- I¿~ Traffhc7.7.0515 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 22.9 0.17 35.9 1.00 35.9 2 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 22.9 0.54 40.5 1.00 40.5 7 30.5 0.54 35.1 1.00 35.1 8 78.1 0.31 6.0 1. 00 6.0 5 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o Copyright (c) 2003 Dowtlng Associates, Inc. Ucensed 10 PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Sat Oct 22 00: 16:402005 Page 3· 3 CUy of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service ComputaUon Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background (PM) Intersection #5: Saich Way I Stevens Creek Blvd. Street Name: Saich Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 4:30-5:30 PM Base Vol: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1235 0 0 1258 57 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 24 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1279 0 0 1282 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1279 0 0 1282 57 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1279 0 0 1282 57 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 ·1.00'1.00 1.00 1,001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1279 0 0 1282 57 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900' '1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.87 0.13 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 17505700 0 05361 238 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.11 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: Green Time: Volume/Cap: Delay/Veh: User DelAdj: AdjDe1/Veh: HCM2kAvg: Signal=ProtecVRlghtsslnclude Final Vol: 198"· 0 62 Lanes: 10001 .,.J4+.þ.~ Signal..Protect Slgnal=Prolecl Final Vol: lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cot Date: 101612005 Rlghts=lnclude lJines: FInal Vol: j> Cycle Time (sec): 110 ~ 263·" 0 57 ~ Loss TIme (sec): . .t- O 1279 3 ----... Critical V/C: 0.547 ...- 2 1282·" 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 26.9 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/Veh): 18.6 0 0 LOS: B· ~ ~ t ~ ~ lanes: 00 0 00 Final Vol: 0 0 0 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude **** **** 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 22.7 0.17 36.1 1. 00 36.1 2 22.7 0.55 40.8 1. 00 40.8 7 30.2 0.55 35.4 1.00 35.4 8 78.3 0.32 5.9 1.00 5.9 5 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o **** 48.1 0.55 23.2 1. 00 23.2 11 48.1 0.55 23.2 1.00 23.2 11 \~~ rz.q Traffix7.7.0515 CopyrIght (c) 2003 Dowling Associates, Inc. Ucensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Mon Oct 24 09:18:37 2005 ' Page 3,2 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Altematlve) projøct(PM) Intersection #5: Saich Way I Stevens Creek Blvd. Street Name: Saich Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 15 Sep 2004 « Base Vol, 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1279 0 0 1282 57 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1279 0 0 1282 57 Added vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WITH PROJEC, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 27 0 Initial Fut, 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1302 0 0 1309 57 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1302 0 0 1309 57 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1302 0 0 1309 57 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 0 0 0 62 0 198 263 1302 0 0 1309 57 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 Lanes, 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.87 0.13 Final Sat.' 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 17505700 0 0 5366 234 ___n___n__1 n___n___n___II___n___n___n 1 I_n___n__n___I1___n____nn__1 capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.11 0.15 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: Green Time: Volume/Cap: De1ay/Veh: User DelAdj: AdjDel/Veh, HCM2kAvg' Slgnal=ProtecllAights=lnclude Final Vol: 198'" 0 62 lanes: 10001 .,.J4~.þ.~ Signal=Proteet Signal=Protect Final Vol: lanes: Rlghts=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 911512004 Rightss;lnclude lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 263'" 0 57 ~ Loss Time (sec): 9 J- 0 1 1302 3 -JI>- Critical VIC: 0.553 +-- 2 1309·... 0 r Avg Grit Del (seclveh): 26.8 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sealveh): 18.4 0 0 LOS: B· ~ ~ t t--- rÞ- lanes: 00000 Final Vol: 0 0 0 Slgnal=protecVRights..lnclude **** **** 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o 22.5 '0.17 36.3 1. 00 36.3 2 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 22.5 0.55 41.1 1. 00 41.1 7 29.9 0.55 35.7 1.00 35.7 8 78.5 0.32 5.9 1.00 5.9 5 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 o 0.0 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 o **** 48.6 0.55 23.0 1. 00 23.0 11 48.6 0.55 23.0 1. 00 23.0 11 l ~- l3D Tralll( 7.7.0515 Copyright (c) 2003 Dowting Associates, Inc. licensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Mon Oct 1715;50:52 2005 Page 3-9 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 - existing PM Peak Hour level 01 Service Computalioo Report 2000 HCM Operations (Base Volume Alternative) Exlsttng(PM) Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd.lStevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2004} Signal",ProtectlRlghts=lnclude Final Vol; 278 1718-- 491 Lanes: 0 1 , 0 2 ~ 4 t ~ ~ Signal",Protecl Slgnal=Prolect Final Vol; lanes; Rlghts=Overlap Vol Crlt Dale; 1012112004 Rights=lnclude lanes; Final Vol; J. Cycle Time (see); 118 ~ 269-- 2 0 255 ~ loss Time (see); 12 J- 0 788 , -þo- CrltlcalVIC: 0.796 ...- 2 819'" 0 T Avg Crlt Del (seclveh); 42.9 r 0 508 Avg Delay (seclveh): 41.3 2 36B lOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ('I'- lanes: 2 0 , 0 Final Vol: 515'-- 1017 "8 Slgnal=ProlectlRights=<Jverlap Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11________-------I Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:15-6:15 PM Base Vol: 515 1017 318 491 1778 278 269 788 506 368 819 255 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 515 1017 318 491 1778 278 269 788 506 J68 819 255 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 515 1017 318 491 1778 278 269 788 506 368 819 255 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 515 1017 318 491 1778 278 269 788 506 368 819 255 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF.Adj: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 5151017 318 4911778 278 269 788 506 368 819 255 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.44 0.56 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.26 0.74 Final Sat.: 31505700 1750 3150 6484 1014 31505700 1750 3150 4269 1329 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.14 0.29 0.12 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 24.2 Volume/Cap: 0.80 De1ay/Veh: 51.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 51.3 HCM2 kA vg : 11 **** **** 34.6 0.61 36.5 1.00 36.5 11 53.5 0.40 21. 9 1. 00 21. 9 8 30.3 0.61 40.0 1.00 40.0 9 40.7 0.80 36.7 1.00 36.7 19 40.7 0.80 36.7 1. 00 36.7 18 12.7 0.80 63.8 1.00 63.8 7 22.3 0.73 47.7 1. 00 47.7 10 46.5 0.73 34.5 1. 00 34.5 17 18.8 0.73 52.7 1.00 52.7 8 **** 28.4 0.80 45.4 1. 00 45.4 14 28.4 0.80 45.4 1. 00 45.4 14 I ~ - \.2; \ Tralx7.7.0515 Copyright (c) 2003 Dowling Associates, Inc. Ucensed to PANG ENGINEERS. INC. COMPARE Sat 0c122 00:16:40 2005 Page 3- 7 CUy of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background (PM) Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd.lStevens Creek Blvd 1636-211 [CMP 2004] Signal",ProtecVRlghts=lnclude Final Vol: 278 1803·" 544 lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 ~ 4 + .þ. ~ Slgnal",Protect Signal",Protect Final Vol: lanes: Rlghts=Overlap Vol GrIt Date: 1012112004 Rights=lnclude lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (sec): 118 ~ 269·" 2 0 271 J¡.. lossTlma(sec): 12 J.- 0 814 3 ---þo- Critical V/C: 0.809 +-- 2 834'" 0 =r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 43.5 T 0 524 Avg Delay (seclveh): 42.0 2 372 lOS: D ~ ~ t fÞ- r+ lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 524·" 1033 336 SlgnaJ=ProtecVRights=Overlap Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ____________1_______________11_______________11 n_____________II_______________1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:15-6:15 PM Base Vol: 515 1017 318 491 1778 278 269 788 506 368 819 255 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Initial Bse: 515 1017 318 491 1778 278 269 788 506 368 819 255 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI: 9 16 18 53 25 0 0 26 18 4 15 16 Initial Fut: 524 1033 336 544 1803 278 269 814 524 372 834 271 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 524 1033 336 544 1803 278 269 814 524 372 834 271 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 524 1033 336 544 1803 278 269 814 524 372 834 271 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 524 1033 336 544 1803 278 269 814 524 372 834 271 ____________1_______________ 11---------------11 n_____________II__nC__________1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.44 0.56 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.24 0.76 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 6496 1002 3150 5700 1750 3150 4225 1373 ------------1---------------1 I-n------------I 1---------------1 1----------- ----I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.14 0.30 0.12 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 24.3 Volume/Cap: 0.81 De1ay/Veh: 52.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 52.2 HCM2kAvg: 11 **** 33.2 0.65 38.2 1. 00 38.2 12 40.5 0.81 37.3 1.00 37.3 18 51. 8 0.44 23.4 1. 00 23.4 8 31.6 0.65 40.0 1. 00 40.0 10 40.5 0.81 37.3 1. 00 37.3 19 **** 12.5 0.81 65.3 1.00 65.3 7 22.6 0.75 47.9 1.00 47.9 11 46.8 0.75 35.3 1.00 35.3 18 18.7 0.75 53.5 1.00 53.5 8 **** 28.8 0.81 45.7 1. 00 45.7 15 28.8 0.81 45.7 1. 00 45.7 14 l~-13z.. Traffhc 7.7.0515 Copyright (c) 2003 Dowling Associates. Inc. licensed to PANG ENGINEERS, INC. COMPARE Moo Oct 24 11 :05:49 2005 Page 3-4 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project (PM) Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd./Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2004] Signal=ProtectJAlghts=lnclude Final Vol: 296 18030.. 544 lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 ~ 4 t .þ.. ~ Signal';PrOlect Signal=Protect Final Vol: lanes: Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date: 1012112004 RlghIÞlnclude lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see); "8 ~ 284·" 2 0 271 ~ loss Time (see): 12 J- 0 822 3 ---... CritlcalVIC: 0.819 +-- 2 643·" 0 r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 44.0 r 0 52' Avg Delay (seclveh): 42.3 2 372 lOS: 0 ~ ~ t ~ ~ Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 21 Oct 2004 « 5:15-6:15 PM Base Vol, 524 1033 336 544 1803 278 269 814 524 372 834 271 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 524 1033 336 544 1803 278 269 814 524 372 834 271 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W/PROJECT, 0 0 0 0 0 18 15 8 0 0 9 0 Initial Fut, 524 1033 336 544 1803 296 284 822 524 372 843 271 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 524 1033 336 544 1803 296 284 822 524 372 843 271 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 524 1033 336 544 1803 296 284 822 524 372 843 271 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 524 1033 336 544 1803 296 284 822 524 372 843 271 n______n__1 n_n__________ II n_nn________11 n_______n__n II---n----------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes, 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.41 0.59 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.24 0.76 Final Sat., 3150 5700 1750 3150 6441 1057 31505700 1750 31504236 1362 n___nnn_l_n____nnnn II--------nn--- II-nn--------n II---nnn------ I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.14 0.30 0.12 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 24.0 Volume/Cap: 0.82 De1ay/Veh, 53.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh, 53.1 HCM2 leA vg , 11 lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 524"· 1033 336 Signal=ProtecVRlghts..Overlap **** **** 32.9 0.65 38.4 1.00 38.4 12 40.3 0.82 37.7 1. 00 37.7 19 13 .0 0.82 65.5 1.00 .65.5 7 22.9 0.74 47.5 1.00 47.5 11 51. 7 0.44 23.5 1. 00 23.5 8 31.4 0.65 40.2 1.00 40.2 10 40.3 0.82 37.7 1. 00 37.7 19 46.9 0.75 35.3 1. 00 35.3 17 18.8 0.74 53.2 1.00 53.2 8 **** 28.7 0.82 46.2 1. 00 46.2 15 28.7 0.82 46.2 1. 00 46.2 14 1<Ò-ß3 T...Hry77n<:t<: r........\WI......II,,\~n....wIl""'AA"""'IAI<>-..ln" lIr.ansod 10 PANG ENGINEERS. INC COMPARE Tue Oct 18 10:55:56 2005 Page 3-3 City 01 Cupertino CMP 2004· Existing PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Base Volume Alternative) ExIsting (PM) Intersection #71: Greenleaf I Stelling Rd. [CM? 2004] SignaJ=ProtectlRlghts=lnclude Final Vol: 46 787 23·" Lanes: 0011 00 .,.J4t~~ Slgna(.,.Protect Slgnat",Protect Final Vol: lanes: Rights=lnctude Vol Cnl Dale: 101612005 Righls=lnclude lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (sec): 60 ~ 49··· 0 0 44 ~ Loss Time (see): 9 ..t- O 0 30 11 -... CrltlcalVlC: 1.100 1- 11 35··· 0 =r Avg Crll Del (seclveh): 187.6 r 0 4. 0 Avg Delay (seclveh); 187.3 0 3. LOS: F ~ ~ t ~ ~ lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Final Vol: 8 521'" 9 Slgnal=ProtectlRlghts=lnclude Street Name: Stelling Road Greenleaf Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R d________n I_nnnnnnn I I-n--n--------I I n_____________II__d__n_nnn I Min. Green, 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 7 7 10 7 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 4:45-5:45 PM Base Vol, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 PCE Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 ________dn I nnnn_______II________ndn_ll_dn________n II nnn_nnn__1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes, 0.01 0.97 0.02 0.03 0.92 0.05 0.38 0.24 0.38 0.31 0.30 0.39 Final Sat.: 26 1695 29 47 1609 94 675 413 661 548 533 670 nnnnnn 1______n____u_II_____nnnnn II n____dn_ndll__nnn_nnn I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 13.1 13.1 Volume/Cap: 1.41 1.41 De1ay/Veh, 221.1 221 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh, 221.1 221 HCM2kAvg, 31 31 **** **** 10.0 0.44 23.5 1. 00 23.5 3 7.0 0.56 28.6 1. 00 28.6 3 **** 10.0 0.39 23.2 1. 00 23.2 2 10.0 0.39 23.2 1. 00 23.2 2 \ e>- \34 .......,............".., 13 .1 1.41 221.1 1.00 221.1 31 20.9 1. 41 211. 9 1. 00 211.9 48 20.9 1. 41 212 1.00 212 48 20.9 1.41 211.9 1. 00 211.9 48 7.0 0.62 31.1 1.00 31.1 3 10.0 0.44 23.5 1. 00 23.5 3 ,....~._I_... fAI 'Jnn'2 n.....~I~_ A~~....I.....~ 1_.. I ,....~...~ ,_ a~Mf":! CMf":!'MCCDC> 1~1'" COMPARE Tue Oct 18 10:55:562005 Page 3-9 City 01 Cupertino CMP 2004 - Existing PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Opera lions (Base Volume Alternative) Existing (PM) Intersection #722: Greenleaf I Stelling Rd. [With CIP] Stelling Road Greenleaf North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green, 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 7 7 10 7 ____________1_______________11_______________11---------------11 __._u__________1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 4:45-5:45 PM Base Vol, .8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. , 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 I-n----- -------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes, 1.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.94 0.06 0.38 0.24 0.38 '0.31 0.30 0.39 Final Sat.' 1750 1769 31 1750 1701 99 675 413 661 548 533 670 ____________1_______________11 n_________u__ II-~-------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.46 0.46 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 10.0 Volume/Cap: 0.04 Delay/Veh: 35.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh, 35.8 HCM2kAvg: 0 Slgnal",ProlecllRlghts",lnclude Final Vol: 46 787- 23 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 ~4t~~ Signal=Proteet Slgnal=Protect FinaJVol: Lanes: Rights:lnelude Vol Cnt Dale; 101612005 RIghts=lnelude Lanes: Final Vol; j Cycle Time (see); 90 ~ 49'" 0 0 44 ~ Loss Time (see); . J- 0 0 30 11 -+ CriticatVlC: 0.673 -+- 11 35'" 0 =r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 26.4 T 0 4. 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 22.7 0 36 LOS: c+ ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 1 0 0 0 Final Vol; 8'" 521 9 Signal=ProtectlRighls=lnelude Street Name: Approach: Movement: **** **** 45.5 0.58 16.5 1. 00 16.5 11 52.7 0.79 18.5 1. 00 18.5 19 8.3 0.79 62.6 1.00 62.6 6 7.5 0.79 64.4 1. 00 64.4 5 10.7 0.61 42.7 1.00 42.7 4 10.7 0.61 42.7 1. 00 42.7 4 45.5 0.58 16.5 1.00 16.5 11 17.2 0.07 29.9 1. 00 29.9 1 52.7 0.79 18.5 1.00 18.5 19 **** 10.0 0.59 42.8 1. 00 42.8 4 10.0 0.59 42.8 1. 00 42.8 4 \ß~\?YS COMPARE Sat Oct 22 00:16:40 200S Page3-S City 01 CUper1ino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernatlve) Bacl<ground(PM) Intersection #7: Greenleaf I Stelling Rd. [WIth CIP] Street Name: Stelling Road Greenleaf Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 7 7 10 7 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 6 Oct 2005 « 4:45-5:45 PM Base Vol: 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATI: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 ------------1---------------11---------------11-----------"---11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.94 0.06 0.38 0.24 0.38 0.31 0.30 0.39 Final Sat.: 1750 1769 31 1750 1701 99 675 413 661 548 533 670 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.46 0.46 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 10.0 Volume/Cap: 0.04 Delay/Veh: 35.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 35.8 HCM2kAvg: 0 Signal::ProtectlAlghls=lnclude Final Vol: 46 787'-- 23 lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 .,.J4t~~ Signal=Proteet Slgnal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rlghts=lnclude VolCntDale: 1OI6I200S Aights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle TIme (see): 90 ~ 49'" 0 0 44 ~ Loss Time (sec): 9 J- 0 0 30 11 -... CrllicalVIC: 0.673 ...- 11 3S'" 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 26.4 T 0 49 0 Avg Delay (see/veti): 22.7 0 3. LOS: c+ ~ ~ t ~ ~ lanes: 1 0 0 0 Final Vol: S'" S21 9 Slgnal=ProtecIlRights_lnclude **** **** 45.5 0.58 16.5 1.00 16.5 11 45.5 0.58 16.5 1.00 16.5 11 17 .2 0.07 29.9 1. 00 29.9 1 52.7 0.79 18.5 1.00 18.5 19 52.7 0.79 18.5 1. 00 18.5 19 8.3 0.79 62.6 1. 00 62.6 6 10.7 0.61 42.7 1.00 42.7 4 10.7 0.61 42.7 1. 00 42.7 4 7.5 0.79 64.4 1.00 64.4 5 **** 10.0 0.59 42.8 1. 00 42.8 4 10.0 0.59 42.8 1.00 42.8 4 \ <0- \3LD Traffix 7.7.0515 CODvrloht (c1 2003 Dowtlno Associates. Inc. Ucensed 10 PANG ENGINEERS. INC. COMPARE Sat Oct 22 00:16:40 2005 Page3-6 City of Cupertino CMP 2004 PM Peak Hour Level 01 Service Compulation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project (PM) Intersection #7: Greenleaf I Stelling Rd. (With CIP] Signal=ProtecIlRJghts=lnciude Final Vol: 46 613"· 23 Lanes: 01 001 ~4+.þ.~ Signal=Protect Slgnal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 1013112005 Rights=lnciude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (sec): 90 ~ 49'" · · 44 ~ Loss Time (sec): . J- · · 3. 11 ---+- CrlticalVlC: 0.669 ..;t- 11 35'" · =r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 27.4 r · 4. · Avg Delay (seclveh): 23.2 · 3. LOS: C ~ +t t ~ rto> Street Name: Stelling Road Greenleaf Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11 _______________11_______________1 Min. Green, 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 7 7 10 7 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 31 Oct 2005 « 4:45-5:45 PM Base Vol, 8 521 9 23 787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 8 521 9 23 ·787 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W/PROJECT, 0 22 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut, 8 543 9 23 813 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj, 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume, 8 543 9 23 813 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol, 8 543 9 23 813 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. , 8 543 9 23 813 46 49 30 48 36 35 44 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19.00 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.92 0.95 0,95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes, 1.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 0.95 0.05 0.38 0.24 0.38 0.31 0.30 0.39 Final Sat.' 17501771 29 17501704 96 675 413 661 548 533 670 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11__________-----I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat, 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 10.0 Volume/Cap: 0.04 Delay/Veh: 35.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh, 35.8 HCM2kAvg: 0 lanes: 1 0 0 0 Final Vol: S'" 543 9 Slgnal=ProtectlRights=lnclude *#f** 46.2 0.60 16.4 1.00 16.4 11 46.2 0.60 16.4 1. 00 16.4 11 16.7 0.07 30.3 1.00 30.3 1 52.9 0.81 19.4 1.00 19.4 21 52.9 0.81 19.4 1.00 19.4 21 **** 8.1 0.81 66.5 1.00 66.5 6 10.6 0.62 43.2 1. 00 43.2 4 10.6 0.62 43.2 1.00 43.2 4 7.4 0.80 66.1 1.00 66.1 5 **** 10.0 0.59 42.8 1. 00 42.8 4 10.0 0.59 42.8 1.00 42.8 4 t ~- \31 Tu.ffv77n<;1<; (".onvrlohl (cl 2003 Dowllna Associates. Inc. Licensed 10 PANG ENGINEERS. tNC. Street Improvements' t <ò- \3lb \\ !¡¡¡! 1 ~ ¡ \ l ~ I ~3 : I j ~: I ~ . ¡.I 0 I i U1 I 1 I t! ~ Poi , I I I ~ I I I U:1jJ !"[]"I ~~j I I I: 1 \ ,__1_ __L__~ ~__ ___~__.. . I) \ _______m___________m___ ..¡._-.-------T-lII~Tm..------ ---.----------------------------------~....~~ , . 1\1:. ..'nJlJi..._________ ~-- I J-----------------.- 1f ~::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.----------1 I ¡ =- ~:: 10' . 250' ---J i :.... 111 .____n__________ .____ ç _!~~ 90 . - , : i r-~----ïä;- .__/- j ~--___-------L-------m-n----- ---..--.-...-, I i I Ii Ç! nn!!I:---------::::=::::::::::::::r-:-:m_______ .1.." ______________m____m__~~ i ! i .=~:::::-m"ç¡.---u~K---- . + . . : ,----7 it:-·, 11' _m________~ : : I -- ~, 90' ------- . ----------------------,1'" ......: I : I 200 11.2" \ I : I ¡ I . I 11' -..! I : ___n____u_____ 11 I I I I f .___________________________ ____.__ \ It i ···...···!J;""",,~-·1 i ¡ ,:--=--::-------.:.:------___m___________:=--.=--=__ -..oL~"=;,"f=;=""=----E:ïîij(_Wlt:._~__I_ I _____m___.J-¡_.- _ ___ f~-j----:..'t-=--=- ·...'\~ï~:~--::rf~Tt--!¡.r( ~6~~~~¡R~REEK ..~. \ , . . , ~'I FP!...... "I'W. )...I' II , . \ ~~tS~~~ALK fj¡ ¡ i ¡ jjj L EXISTING : i ¡¡I !~¡ LANE WIDTHS !:!¡ ¡ 'I i !¡;¡i ãi: I ~ : I : :: ,IDI ! ¡·o ¡¡ ! ¡ ,¡IN II : : ,"" I' II !! I! ; I ~ ~ I : ! I 4·: : I ~ ., \..1' I I I ¡ I þO'11"11' ! I I: II: : I , .\ ¡¡ j I I! II I : I!!"g!\ ¡ I : I' '... I ¡ I I, I t -I- t NO SCALE ~.,,~ EXISTING S' SIDEWALK I PROJECT SITE 5' liKE LJ.HE~ 3' SHIFT OF CURB AND GUTTER TO 1I1E HORTH 65' TRANsm~ ) ~I EXISTING 7' BIKE LANE PLUS 2' WIDENING (9' TOTAL) SHELL GAS STATION 1-15'± 1',' CONCEPTUAL STREET IMPROVEME/NTS STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD STELLING ROAD \~-\3C\ ew:}!!!!IBw.r.. 4Ia512 EXISTING LANE WIDiHS '\ \ \ .. - - ,"'~ - ,- ,·¡··.¡:::-:-_-_-.:.-.L".-mBUNiC.::::.-.:.-:::::.-:-.-:.-.:.-::.:::_-: ---'::. -.:.:::::¡:¡~:::~::==::~~~~::::::::~=~~~::.-=~~~-{;a~~:::::..- 1:~ 11' - 111 1" :11': I L..-..:.- . _ . '- II' - , 11' '11" ! L::..-- 11 ~ : : '- 11' , ",11' '12" ': --------....-.---------------... -- ------- 11 .ç ...:x; I i JI~~7_~~:::-_::=::-:.::::.:-_:_.:::=:7_::=_::::::__::..~::=:::::~=~~~-£~~~~~-~-~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~--~~-=~~~~~~~::.-=~~~-~~- ! :. A" I :: -- 200' 90 r . !~c:--":c.::::::~=-=::=:::==.:::=--=-------==:==,:=---=-=:=-~-:--=::-==-..c::: " BIKE LANE J' SHIFT or CURB AND GUTTER TO TIle NORTII PROJECT SI1E NEW D/W 3D' lANE 5' BIKE 3' SHIFT OF CURB AND GUTTER TO THE NORTH ...J .. GAS SHELL STATION 'j' i I I i \, '" z :J :I: (J ~ ;:¡ 198' lWISITION 65' 45';1; - Q -< o C<: ~ Z ::; ...J W l- V) , EXISTING 7 BIKE~ _._~-------, - --------- --------- ------.:::::_---------- ---1:2' ...J .. lANE BIKE s' STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD 1\... 1 12' -;ç-jfr----·------------------- ,--------------...------------------- ------------------------------------ __0-. --\..----------....------ 1'--1 ~! , 11· "1~'" , , '------------"";,~......-.... ----------------------- ... z :J :>: '-' !;¡ ;:¡ -.- \I. 1\. SCALE NO ---------_.._-----------------------------~--------------------------------------------. ----------------.---..------------...------------.---------------.-.-.--------------- STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CONCEPTUAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD / STELLING ROAD L\:b lOS12 \ WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. c;þ 900 High Street. Suite 1 PaIoAllo,CA 94301 p:6S0.853.19OB f:650.853.1845 ~ R..AI'fIH:.i 5lENITTAL 5EP1B"1:!ER23,~ R.,...ðHfiSôiEaetII1T,.ðL OCTcea<:2.f.1~ '"""""'....CIT1' NO'va'EIfR 1Ø,2ØØ5 RE\I15ICt6PERS'JJõOCTIRAL M::ìV. 30, 2ØØ5 R.AtfoIKI ÆSŒ!MITTAL DEC.1E>,2ØØ5 - - - - I'IIOJ~~ MO. øs-;¡3 o,o.TE Aü:;,UST4,2ØØ5 --~ - - COVEll SHEET SII:ET ASO.O @KO¡Ul(H'ÆCTSIIC. WHOLE FOODS MARKET 20955 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino. California 95014 SCOPE OF WORK THE PROJECT UI-IOLE FOOD5 MAfõðŒT IS LOCATED AT TI-IE N~&T COf'iNEF<: a= STEVENS CFi!EEK 5OLILEv.ARD AND NORTI-i STEl..LIN;::;; ~AD. TI-E PROJECT ADDRE55 IS 2~ 5TE'1EH5 CREEK 6OULEyARD, CUPERTIN.O, CA $Ø14. 11-IE 5COFE OF 11-IE PROJECT IS TO CCNSTJõi1JCT A NEW o-IE-SìORY 64,øøø 50. FT. RETAIL BUILDING. - GROCERY N.A.RKET euILDI~. 2Ø$S 5TE'IEN& QæEK BOULEvARD CUPERTINO, CA $"14 H YoN YE5 1ØØICAL.FOIõNIAI!U~00D£(= 2IZIØI C,ðI,..I'ORHI,oI. r-EGWlICAL. CODE (01C! WØI çALJ'OI;NIA ~ COOE (C/"C) 2lZlØlCAL.~IA~ COOE cœc:) 2lZlØlCAL.f'OI'I-.....~"'(JE6U,.ATICI'I& _FlÆc.GID£(CI'C) AU. CIT'T'.IOOf"ÆP ac>~ ili!E..ATtö TO øJlI...ONG ~l1'õUC1'\OI'I PROJECT ADDRE56 OCOJPANY GROUP rrF'E ~5TRUCTION 5PRJI'I(LERED CODE REFERENCES A PROPOSED NEW PROJECT BY: SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY SHEET INDEX G ENE R A L: ,6,50.0 COYER SHEET ,6,50.1 PROJECT SlI"I1ARY TA6I...E, vlClNtrr 4 AERIAL M,ðF5 C , V I L: C1 FRELI11IHARY GRADn-t:;, 4 DRAINAGE PLAN C2 STOR'1IJATER M~T PlAN ARCHITECTURAL: A51.0 EXISTING. CctIDmCN5 AS1.1 FÆLIMIIiART' SITE Ft..AN C 51-1fLL. ewLD~ FLOOR PLAN A52.0 F'RELIMINART" ROO" Ft..AN A54.0 0VEF1ALL &cI-Et1ATlC allLDl1't::o E1...EVATICt5 A54.10 SCI-EMATlC S~ ELEvATION· STE~ CREEK. 6QJLEvARD AS4.1b 5C1-1EMATIC STI'£ET ELEvATION· sTEVEN5 CREEK 6COL.EYAfëD AS4.2 5Cl-EMATIC ENTRY FACADE ELEVATiON - MAIN ENTRY A54.3 ENLARC:rED PARTIAl.. ELEvATIc:N5 - ENTRJE5 A54.4 EN1..~D PARTIAl.. ELEVATJ~ - ux::oD CANOPT DETAIL A55.0 cçt.ICEPi1JAL LAH:>5CAF'E R...ðN A56.0 p~LOTLIGI-/T1NS5T1.Ð-r A57.0 PROJECT ~~ ¡- i 1. , ~ t 1 PROJECT TEAM DrvELoPER/OWNER: SAND HILl. PROPERTY COWPANY F'I'Dne: (b50) 344-15ØØ }ØE.FC\IRf1.! A¥EI'fJE Fax: (b50) 344-ØbS2 SAN MATEO. CA ~I CO'rUct: .JOI..H TU J~.~.::oIII KAREN '"'" """''''1'<'''''''" ARC HIT [ C T : KO ARCHITECTS \HC. F'hone: (b50) ðS3-19Ø8 søø I-IIGI-I STF1£ET, SUITE ¡ Fax: (bSØ) ð!B-Je.4S PALO ALTO, CA ~}ØI COnUIC~ PETER 1<0, AlA dealg'l-.øarchcOll'l MAFIJ(t1.I>IOZ I1èIIt.~rch.ccm T.I. ARC HIT [ C T : B[CKHAW DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS (BDGA) Fh:;>ne: (&12 ) 343-2:n~ SW& 5I-!OAL Cfõ!EEK 6l YD. "21Ø F<1Ix: (&12 ) 343-S12& AUSTIN. TX 1&181 CO'rUCl: ..Jc:')I..toI eECKI-'AM Joh\.bed<.hall~rdi\.eCt.&£GIII TENANT: WHOli FOODS WAAKET CAUFORNIA. INC. F'I'Dne: (&10) 428-144~ ~ 1-IOflTC« STÆET, SUITE ;¡ØØ Fax: (~1Ø) 428·14~ EMER"TVILLE. CA ~øe Contact< DEBRA MAR/NOZZI ~a_rirlC>1Z1<1ù1olefooGl&.CCII G EDT [ C H N I C A l [ N GIN E E R UNITED SOIL ENGINEERING, INC. Ft1ono=: (40&) 9&8.~ ~18 EDWARD AvENJE Fax: (4Ø[;)~.I3*, SANTA CLARA. CA ~ Con\.aCl: SEAN DEIYERT ede!vert......ltecbcl\,C.OII\ WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. A. 900 High Street, SUite 1 .. PaIoAllc,CA94301 p:650.853.1908 f: 650.853.1845 ~ PLAlØIG: 5EII1ITTAI.. 5EPTB'EER 23. wøs ~ Fi£5æMfTTAL OCToeER 2-4, 2Ø(t5 ~f'ERcrrr ~1Ø,2ØØS ~ FER5~ NOV. 30. 2ØØ5 ~i£sœMJTTAL DEC.I6,2Ðœ PRO.ECT stMotARY TABlE Ii MAPS ,RO.€CI'IIO.øs-313 ClAn: AOOL5T 4, 2ØØ!> --~ - IE ASO.1 PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE SITE: AREA (&G. FT. ,.:\ND ACRES) NET AREA _241þE>Ø SF. ~ :105£>8 ACRES GRO&5 AREA t:241.5'hØ SF. c !Sh8 ACRES TOT Ai. SUILPING AREA ""8.214 SF. PROPo&EP BUILDING AREA GRC'LND LEVEL b3ßS4 SF. RJTURE MEZZANINE LEveL 4,32Ø SF. FLOOR AREA RATIO 02"" (2i.o %) 6LDG AREA I NET SITE AREA 63,5S4 5F / 241,sóØ 6F . Ø2E> NLN6ER OF STORIES ONE-STORY un¡..¡ A f'I..lTlJRE MEZZANINE LEYEL HE"*' 450' MAX. BUtLDING PAD ELEVATION 261.12 -2642>8 . Ø.12 FROM CURB TO FINI51-1 FLOOR (2% .5L0FE) CURB ELEVATION VARIES, :it2"'Ø.4Ø - 2"'336 AS EXISTING ALc:::t-IC:õ: 5TE\IEN& cREEK BOULEVARD NLt16ER Œ EMPLOTo::.E5 ~CTED 4ØØ TOTAL TEAM t1EM6ER5 <EMPLOYEES) 1ØØ-12S TEAM MEM6Efõ!;5 ~ AT AN.,... ONE TIME NlM6ER 0= SEATS PROJECTED 02 BAR .seATS (INDOOR.>: 22 NON-SAR SEATS (INDOOR 4 C\JTDOOR CAÆ TA6LE5)' """ FAF<KJNG REQUIRED læ 51 ALL5 A55tJ'1E AVERAGE OF 1 SPACE FER 2541 SF FOR úENERAI.. CCM"IERCIAL 11,$Ø/250 . 2æ &PACES REQUIFi!ED P~INGo F'ROYIDED 316 STALL.S OFF-5T'f<£ET (& STALL.S FER!,IÞØØ SF) STANDARD PARI<!NG (6~); 212 ~TAL.LS COMPACT PAF!Kr»:::. (~), 15>6 ~T ALLS ACCESS/au: PA~INr:::., 1 ~TAl..LS } ACeESOleLE VAN ACCESS. PA~, I ~T.ðJ...L HOURS OF OPERATION a,øø AM TO IIZI,ØØ A'1 EXI~TINc:. use: cc:t"f"'IERClAL PROPOSED UOE GRlXERT' / Fi:ET All.. AND CAFE ZONIN:;:. DESk:iNATICt-I PLANNED DE'ÆLOA'1ENT GENERAL PLA.N DESIGNATION cc:t'I"1ERClAL/0FF"!CEIRE5IDENTrAL FAY1NG AREA t!6!,ØØ2 ~.f. (65% OF NET LOT t>.F<EA) I..AND5CAPE AREA !24¡4øa S.f. C1Ø% OF NET LOT AREA) 5IGNAGE ALLOWED - PRELIM CAl.OJLA TIONS TOTAL 822 SF FER SPECIFIC PLAN, 13 SF FER O-IE PARK:lNc:. LOT ~'-ø' x 1..5 . 522 SF LINEAR FOOT STEvENS CREe::::: 2Ø0'·Ø" x 1..S . 3ØØ SF 5~ PROFOSED - NOT A PARr TOTAl.. 126 SF MAIN ENTRY 51C;,NAGE (PA~ LOT): 5'-2" TALL LETTE~ . ~5 Sf' 5100 STACKED LOGO &lc.:.NAGE (P.AR!<INC;. Lon 3'-':" TALI.. LETTEF'1.& . m Sf' &IGN STACKED LOGO SIc.:.NAGE (STEVENS CREEK); 4'-1" TAL-I.. LETTERS· 24':1 SF 51GN FARJ<:INc:.l..OT !NTERlOR LANDSCAPING 12% LAND5CAP~ C13þ22 SF LANDSCAPr»:::. / 118,283 SF PA~) 3 NT5 AERIAL MAP ffi ~ ¡! ~ N ~ w ALVE5 DR ~ >" ~ " u ~ ~ ¡! ~ N ~ w D ~ SITE eLYD VICINITY MAP (NTS) AERIAL MAP (NTS) 85 STEvENS \CREEK ~~ ., @ PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE 2 N'T5 VICINITY MAF WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY BKO Architects, Inc. 9QOHighStreelSlße1 --- P~IoAllo.CA 94301 p:650.&53.1908 f:650.853.1845 ..- KEY MAP EB ,DE. . WRlCHT alii. __ . ....,..,...:. n51,s-..__.tIuiIdin1;~.I"OII)T!T_ ~a....c.'_!ISŒô<"""("'"ì727-51>+1 ~ ..- 1'IIOJU:I'1III.NJ5235 E9 DATE DECDlBER12,2005 _WI!'" SV - AS SHJ\IN PRELIMINARY SlEET GRADING & C1 DRAINAGE PLAN @KOAJICIIQIiC1$-=- A05235 - "',! / '1 t,. f" i~;. ¡ ,~! ,:~ 0=' '2~. ,~ .~~';¡,,:w"T'. ".,·-t,.",:..,<-", 'i'.'" . '.I.<.I....r.-'." ::~$:c" 1 " -, .. .. (. ·l . .'~', '. '.,. . ,'. "-.. '. ~ ,"" , .. ':. .. '., i,;;". ,. .~., .. ' "'" .. .~.. ~"r-::' , . 'or, ,.v', . ""';''''':':, "'j ¡ I .. ¡ i,k,',;.;:LJç' . : i II 'I '....1'.' '~!;':!¡;. .. '. .: .¡, ., "j '. I I,,; I'. {~~..., I ;.: 'I: : " ;.$-~: !: ~,' :' :.. .~-!, !II ";':Dr''(¡ ... "'....... i I... ,i~..~.,. . I. I.' ""i: ¡ '. '. . i.' ,';!'" "tt ! ,,[,.. ,,...1.<_. ·1' '''' ....~.",. (. ;11 '. :'''';,\11':,';', .,' t)"Ft"<:;4 I ,',:: . ':'-"-, i> '.: i ;, ':.< ; :'.' '''¡ :r~ ., ' " ',,~\ < ' :f"<". ,¡: .. II.' I' ,'"", \j ,;I-"'.'j' ':-1 ".,,,\,.., ""," I. ""'" I , . I I,. ~I~ ! ' , I'i :'., ,'o! , ê ';', - I j!¡::~t" L' I.;, \ I I ":f Q¡, " : Iii" ~þ..'" .c " I. " 'r ' /< 0'. ,. I,' _'''' ,..> .' .0: n:: '~Ir ~ . '" ,- f: ' (! " I. .~" . , :z \;,1:1 . kL ~I~ '3 !!'r¡""'<;cf: 'I '~". " . :w:i¡'''f'"''l! ~ ~'~r,;;, ", '" .: ~. ~ Ii??' r ¡~ ,¡~!i9~" c' >è~o, . _ ~¥,. 1 ' ~r1"''', I '" _.. "~" _ '<I,!, <j/' ;", < ~. ,k';., , .I ~ ._. ' , '" . . .iI,. . , _, _', .". , .', . ,. h. , ~ r , _, " . "", " " '.... " I.--_._-_._,...J ,!I _ ,:,ÌIV~ ' . ',,--,. '~ '--'., "'" " ' ,. ", /".- ''"'f1~. -- .tL,_,~__. '. '.. "'_.. "',' O'!i'¡l~¡!f i'n .~'~":: ,- .... ". i~_:~<~i.<,=~;~~~¿~:: " · ~1-ii'J~ H· - .,""- , .j J'" !¡'1i<"q".;<::=t-~,_..o.,.o o~.,""",," __ _.L,=_ . . '. ~ ;c "A li. . ~''1'''~¡¡ __L'~",ê;¡ 1'C~~"~~"=~~~'-'''F~-:~ç."-=,..~_._u>u,,.".,. ~ /<¡ ';y. " ~ '~"'" . . -" - .,'-" ". -.- -'~- - ;~t~T¡;ï~~~:;~:~~~~~~=-'C~~~~~i5 . ,-. -; ~ ~- "- " / . -"" - ~ ::~~~~~L~,;:t:f~ 'e: ¿',¿: -~: >_>"~'" ." -:.-::-:.."....!.::~ <::".;-::::-.:::-,:,1 -' ~. '" -...... '"="=" " /-f¡: . .r ~~ ~'.V , , iF ¡ ! ,. " .~ - ------ ;;¡" =.~ , --- --,----------------- ~':-' . 2Ø4.7 ~:;;-- "::~ _.~--:; .1'(/ .T-- -¡. , ~-¡: ~ ,. ~ - ..¡....!! ".::.' ~. - 4'.~. -, [ ~ ¡w---' :=~~~,~~~~~-,:~=~' y .--,--1/ .,." / . "--,-r- "" ,_..... _ /...-- --..., ;'.S$!Ö!Ii9('~ -:;f GOD (3~S.:> ~.R. 2.::::,) ~ BdO~ You Di&" kI Ca6fonWo, NC'Yada a.... H_aii ~ 1~·2444 ~~ . '" ~.. .. ~ . . ¡¡ ~Scn;...-.·"" "";-fl.,lß:· .o9I)K<Iocm.........._"'CoAcon!,CA.94~J2J.2 S<:<IIa 1- = 30 1\ ~~~.,...92S-1'!16-16&3 - - C-1tIPQ1:-IIC)Y.c-5IT£,C-T1LII,c-GRAD --- ~~JS\A02!i7.B~\QIII.~T_I'LW\C7_A(l..,. D£rDBiII~-- ,,,....,w WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND Hill PROPERTY COMPANY BKa Architects, Inc. goo HiglStreet, $L.ite1 -- PaloAlto.CA94301 p:650.B53.1908 f;65O.853..1845 ..- KEY MAP EB 'KlER . WRIGHT CIIa ....... . IUD'ØOa. -.c. 3U!__....nI.IkII~:2.("""J'r.!}~ s-.o-Co'__. .AXI«II)T.!1_' - ..- __NJ52J5 E9 \IIJt DECD/BER12.2005 _I'I'SV ~ ASSH:I\rIN STORMWATER IlEEf MANAGEMENT C2 PLAN @(OUCHfIII:I5C.. A05235 Co. "" ~ 'f' , , I ~ .,.,,' '/ I ,"I~,. 1/ . ... . · '" '" rn. _, ~'_', ~,~ ..... '.' ",'. ..... .-..> > ........./ ..~...........~":'"-f'"~':,.~~'- t~ ", .. -"'" . , . /' .._~ ~ '.=.". -- , -~ ~b:=,: ~-~- '::~[:':·.~¡~i ~i-~=':::CC4~='~-- . -- -ë·~i_· '" "it t 'J);' , :t ;: ,/ ~'F """If' ,.-. k/~ ~' ¡"SS£Ii!!(·,'CFGO.D (~56" ~_R. 2':-') " ~F~" ;'~' , ',:": - . . ~] __~_ -;-1 <~:c~~ -~<~<~ .;{' ---_._----_._--_...-.......,£..--- ..(;'. 8" .~ -:f~ (...... I ¡f::" """''" ,iI~ ',. "",'I.- ,.._~ , I _ _-=-....,,_.....,.-=¡;~~ ... /.j \~'"Ci~-::"!~~7;)-_:.-_,! --- ~ , ,..........:- -' ~- C3J]8efon,Y_Dî! hi. 0I1i1"onåa, Nc:Yada md B.--ü ~ ~ 1.m.642-2444 ~ :f.. . '" '" .;'; . . i/ ¡;1.~- 2O-1~ $oaI.1".3Oft ~" - - - C_1OP(Ic-IØ)Y.(-snE,c.-Tn8,C-4!IOÐ.(-S1RIII -- 'V _PlMf\C2-SIW.doov DE~"- 11,401.... LEGEND 1NOICA'!EJ)N!£}.DRAI!£D'JO'ÆGET....lIDSWAl,[S WHOLE EXISTIN(i, CI-lURC>-I FOODS MARKET - (E) DAYCARE CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LITTLE VlLL.AGE SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY ~5IIILEQftiDi U'N:3:$-31..ot9 - 662.40' - "1 -I ir4 I "--- -.\ rœ Ko Architects, Inc. ~ I EXISTING. . 900 High SUeet. Suile 1 ;;.. elJlLDING PaIoAl&o,CA 94301 ~ p:6S0.853.1908 ~ ~. j\-j f:650.853.1845 , I I ~ ~. I ~, ,-~ ~ 1#V.:t,44115Q.IT ,~. ~ ... "".15 - --- ,~ . ~~ <= I - -. . EXISTING ~ ~ 6UILDING - - " .(NE1') ............. (NET) ,--/~;;~~;C=)/~ IGROSS) - " - ")""') ~ ~ ., -. , , ---' "- ~, exiSTING BUILDING. ,-~ 1EGMT:1U " M£A:2II,sz:I5Q.IT ..... .!ia' T - 1 / Htff ~ EXISTIt-t= BUILDING. - ~ .~ A.AII<I'I>SIEMITT"- S£PTEI"eER23,Wfh íi A.AII<I'I> mœt1ITT"- OCTceEF/: 24, wœ . N , ~""CIT1' NO'Æt£IER IØ, 2ØØ5 I ~""51RJC11Iò1L NCN. 3Ø, 2ØØS ~F/ESlE!t1JnAL DEC. 1&,2ØØ5 . / ~ - ~.- "OJECT MO. /tIS-3ß- -- ..., E9 ~~ AI.ICôOST4,~ . PTN PARCEL ONE . .~ DRA_8I'IJ 14,269 sq. It. ~, . D.3276 _ 475_62' - 1".;)Ø'·0' - treVEt!t:c::REB:~A!IÐ - - - - I'UBLl(;NWffafWt.ywrDn;I'.uœ& <t ðTEv!!N6~eLVO ~~¡þ'-ø" GRAPHIC SCALE ~......,. EXlSDIG IBEET . ~ ~ COIØTIONS AStO (DlmT) 1-"" 30 ~ - 1",3<>' EXISTING CONDITIONS @ ~g,wlCHlJECl"S..c. ~ , ... "", .,,,, ....: '\ - ..... "! ~-'\ ~ ~ ~ ..... ...--~ ~ ~ - \~- .. - !i: ", .. . \,. f "'-- -.- "... ~ ::::::1'1. ....., '. ", - /' ~ ..... .- , V EXIST"'" "A5~ \ &T.ATIc:N TO F<Et1AN 'v/ '\ .- """""WKT~ BYLPm1.JJ" <E)~&T~ '0_ . R!GHTSŒTI£F'\J/!lJC-" ~ .-- ~~- PAAŒJ.'IW· "! ~: · " · · · pœ pAAŒJ. twO~ ~_. PTN PARCEL ONE T12sq.1t. , O.0163iKI'Mi , IIIGHTSOfl1-£F'\JIU " .-. pœPAAŒJ.O ~~, S ...... 11. FD ............) .....ow. s KEY MAP ~ ~5UB1mAL SEPTEt'ElER23,2tIØS ~ÆSlØ1mAl.. OCTc:eEfê. 24, WfIh """"""'....= ~ 1Ø,2ØØ5 ~f'ERS~ 1CY..3Ø, WfIh PLN+I1tt:õ: IæSi.B1ITT AI.. DEC.1&,2ØØ5 ~.- PROJ[çT 10(1. Ø!>-3ß EB ~~ Atk:iJ&T4,2Ø1t'-> DRAWllIII' U - I".:£I'-Ð' ~y SlEET SITE PLAN AS1.1 & S/EI.l. BLDG PLAN @ICO.urc>o'J(Çf$N;. WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. ø 900 High Sbeel Suite 1 PaIoAllo,CA 94301 p: 650.853.1908 f; 650.853.1845 ~.- œ C~ Æ!'1O'v'E{E)1LiÃLLS /;h ~~~-==~o=,,~,o STOIõ!E~ P~I.OTTl'EE5TO.4AVEo(¡O. ~-/, ~~~~- ~ __. -~ -', -,..11 / ._r=-::--r....·~O=~I..nQ...E5 ~-<!:/':- 'I /z ' .----..~~~ - .~~ ~ , -I'U ~~-:- '- : /-)--: -; ".:.; . . . ~1" -~ d . '(':"0:"'" ~ ::: :-::..:;;: ~ ~ -:.. ::. := H . i --- 11:~ I, IY¡~" V I III1 i 1111111 ~}~ I~J;~g~~;1 ;; ,"",1"~". "I"" "" " , "'" : )'J) 'V AIV 1 1 ~, 11 I' 11 'I 11l~~"'{''1Z</--~··-<'~5;~¡;~.:, ' :I:~-, " I ,., - - I," >(., ~. -~ - 1 . r- . .,." - . - . "'~,"'V'- ~ . ¡ I .:. . ¡ ~ ""¥ IS t:. r;i) '" ;:-0-- ,,,,~-. :;' ,Fiol: i ., . l I I I Tel T Ill, ,T,I ~[L T ¡;mr, -',';,Ill',~,'f," 11'0'", 'I ~ r" =~~~,' ., .,;, '_.' .M L [ . ~ ~il"irr;;T ~~ ~: 0 1 / "'i'" 5!11ALE.TTI". & ~~ :',1 ..¡ + 'P <SO, ~;!'"\AI'I~: . I . ~'-0"T'YP r>-:', ,..- ,I I ' "'" , ' i ¡ , -i> $IILðJ.E.TYP. ~ .;; ¡ : i :.~¡;, '\\';~HÄL~ I ~NX1(õ!MAfõJoœT~ ~ ! :t"i~A J ~11~j I J I~I : lfltll,J. 1"I~ll~lf~~.t:~i \~~~~,::;i i : I~ ~ 'IE ~1111:llllml~~=~liIIIRI·fÐ~r::-~~~~::" · _:~ , a !: -+- 11 11 I i>1 l"","""pÎm, 1'1 1 ~I d ~~ f ~ ~¡ PROPOSEDl'æTAIL ~ ~! ~ I '. . ~ . I . . . , ~ I I. I ~ I ~ . , I.: _:,' ~Ì¡i.~ I ~ ~, ~~~~ ...¡~;~: ~ ,~ ~ . i ~III 1T [ ~TIITIET IT ,I 1 [,. ,'. : 1. ,~ 9" "f,AL'6.>145Fi, I>: ¡~..c:),c(, ~)-;,.-7 ...J ~ " + ILL ,[ IÞ,' ~ -I~,"J '"',,: < ~Mc" .,', TOTAL A',,""""'" . 316 ",' ALL' .-;",- -' '. T\j /. .! fII r-,..... T $l/JALE.TYP. Tou _,,___"'~ r,-' .' " , 'I -~ --.-' .......- W . I':" , . _._."P~" - . ------. !"7 ,UI'M ~TAOœC> LOGO a: e'4" TYP " ill, ", ,- OEOGTMoCDS ! ; j / \~ : 'Ç~mí"'lIIJI~I(1II~I~. ~,~-~.r. II~ i; I~I ~II'.'! ,,-,. ::;: ~ I~:=~~= i it» f- ~ ,~- ·>lI,IT I ITI 14t· ~, '""",~"""'-~ I " \ ( _ ._ . ~,. 0 a: I 1.':",_ c:: f"- [H i01R>~-'-' I'" a ' ~ I ~~ ~~ ~~",,",...J!-... ro:::-' I I,d'! º~' """'''"'"''''"rn> 1\ l.Tx] , I I ' z +~ ~,':R 1\ I~f EX"T""~~' III I 1 :¡,A'~ !;:¡ú:îì q ¡ \ I I fl· EX15'''''' 5TAT!c:toI. .' ...L. . +::,.~ ·i I, __ I PEMO~~ I /'r--.L· I '~ SUIL.Dn-c;. '_ ... ~ p±', ,~. . '\'\IJJ" .L_""""",=f' \, I I' .."..... ......... '(lØ'\- ~ VI' . . . .. I c:=J Ji u~:-FQR8'PI-O'T'EE I \1 't~ I r\~ \- ,~. rtr1'-~T~U~.· ~ ~ ~"; ,;r. ..J. ';.,0;' " ,-,""""" 1 X " 1 r¡""""""""l¡ I Il'<ob"'í C,6Æ 1,\ , I I II:¡ ~ t I I \ 'I I G RJ FAD II Q ~ ~ Q ~Ð" LQIJ WALL wI\l.I ,"'I r.: ' 18 i I I \ I .......f:;:;. ~ C, -,' '" I, _ ¡ ,~~ i>. ~" ,f" ~ ' . ö> '¡ '~ -,,~ I' \ 1 I 1,1 II .'o::(cl ~1\1 I >'1 !:2 I ~ LOG05IGN- I , ~_b~__~~ __~~~ --~~~ m 11:111/ I¡'·~'-+"'\."-~~ In ;.. :-'<4f ~AP_ 2-;=, .- ...- . ..':}\-..' -. Q.. --~-, _______ . .. .1/f/): '. ; . .. ~' "%:ijJ." ~ .0' i'-- .-7.Ä"~~-; F1J+ tv:.::'"'"- \,.-.-- . ""'" '. - ,7':-= "¡:7""'" , . . r'"~'¡-' ~", - """"'" J .'" ____~____~ o"f'"'1. ~ '7% - ~-Ji.-± &'7~' ~ y'. J~' - ---../ ! JS'-.· ;!e'.t." ~._IÞ" !>~'4" .-ø-c" ,-. i OFeI~ÆNI2W1l)1VIIE!I----.J / ~'... \ \' \ \ : $IDEIW.X TO IUIDet AoO AU6N UT¡' ----./ : _ _ - - - - - - ""'\- , 'fI.EEXI&1'IGI"'IOOJSC'ÆDecoEIIW.KN L-Ø'JEVEN!>c:fii£8<:BLvr::>fõ!ECLlÆD : MONT~1'J.EEXI&TNõG.45!1TAf1Oo / / _ _ _ \ ~6'-Ð"L.AN05CM'EŒTeACK !3'-c"~M::;II.N;I(eEfiI"I&)1I.I'nI / \' - - " ~.£D:!oE.sa¡L.MÐ5CAFE~ _~PAD o!=:~::'~~~_F::"~ / A / \ \ ~~ I HOT !NI::..UCED N ~ AF'P'LIGATIOH ~ T'I'õiI5E$ ALONGI ~TEvee aæec: ðLIIP , TO eE ~ I"'LAtoE TÆE~, TYP. i STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD 1"'3Øf - ~ 7l. .- .~-.-- --;- ~, , (-'¡-.....' ';:::.., 1 1 EX/5TN::: 6U1L.DfN:::I EXI5TING 6UILDING PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN TABULATIONS 511E AREA: Sbð ACRE5 (241PhØ SF) NEW RETAIL AREA, 1.41 ACRES (6;¡,8~ SF) NEW FLOOR AREA, 1.51 ACRES. ('-"8,2\4 SF) FAR(IN(;, :;;16 STALL5 TOTAL 5TANDARD F~ING, 212 STALL5 CCf"'F'ACT PARKJNG (4Ø%): 1&6 5TALL5 ACCE551BLE FAFiKiNG, 15TALL5 vAN ACCE55. FA~: 15TALLS 5;'1 5T AJ...L.5 FER \,øøø SF (E) DAYCARE LITTLE VILLAGE (L\ :C ~ - -- ~ ÆDE5~""'" IIFM 8TAOC:EC L060 MCN.rENT _ - HOT A .,./IRr )£UJ~I&a.£l"El'ITALc:::M:;;P~LOT-$EE ~~ I KEY MAP ~ f'I..Al'f4tG $EMlTTAL !fF'1e"I6ER n 2ØØS f'LAl+I&'G F£SlE!MITTAl OCTOEIBi! 2., 2IDØS ~FERc:rrr ~IØ.~ ~ ÆRS~ MOv.3Ø,WØ5 ~lif:sœMJTTAI.. DEC.I&,2ØØ5 I'lKlJECT MO. £15-313 PAlE AlXõlJ5T4,2ØØ5 OU,.....BT IJ - HEEl AS2.O ~~ WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. ~ 9OOHighStreet,Suite1 ... PaIcAllo,CA 94301 p:650.853.1908 1:650.853.1845 - ~.- EB @KO ~.- E9 PREL.IoIIWIY ROOF PLAN 2ØXZø F'FI&J1JNAR'I'" FiOCf EGUIFtENT, TYP. Nr:JFrn4 FACN::. CLERESTORY 1'iOŒ J1c:;t{TOR, T'r'P. F<X>1 p¡;£Lt1INA1i!'r~EQJIF't'ENT,TTf'. !2"x 12'!D.RC'Cf' ROCf 5CI<!EEN, TYF. FROYIDE sc::¡;er.¡ TO TOP a= f"ECI.WOCAL.l.t4fTS IIJ.ERE PARAPET WAU. Dœ& NOT f'Fi'DYIDE ,ðDEQJATE 5CFifEN. AIR INTAKE !4OCO, 50 X IØØ ~ OFENm ;IX;IRXf~ RCiCf .AT~ Gf'fNIt6 LOCATICN. SIZE FER U1A 14 X 14 ROŒ 0FENtt2 MAIŒ I9XI9FiOCf~ ffiElf1tt.lAR'l' FJ:)OF EGUIF'tENT, TrP. ~ ~ITFORTRAtI~ 19 X 19Rr:Xf0f9l1tt:> I4X14!i'ÐCf0FENH::;.MAKE 2Ø x 212> ~ 0f'ÐUN(:j:, TYP. 6Al.C<><Y I1E7 AI.. 'ZACTIGIE' zt-C FINI5W f"DCF. TYP. STACIŒD LCGO SIGN· NOT A PART PRELIMINARY ROOF PLAN I ,..,ø· ""'" TJ..E ROCI"TOP EaJlftÐ/T N'OfiMATlOO INDICATED 00 1'1-115 FLAN IS ~ 0f<PEõ! Cf' HAúNI'I\DE A:-V GeNERAL IDEA Cf' Lc:cAT1CN a= EGlLIFtENT eM.. 'f . n-E II>FOfõtIATION éll'ÆN IS NOT 5PECFIC TO 11·115 PROJECT. ROCf~, TYP. ~L)ITFOTLT. 1UI:) 125'·4" - '~'O----- / i , " .~ o ~ ;.,...., ~'IO' :: ,¡'I ; :~., 'I,J . 1:,Jj- r'f~~ ~ ~~1 ' I':;,¡~I': ,".;"l!i ),:~ ' ,~.¡'''' ¡: , - ". : ,~~ U ~~~ o 0 . 8· llddJ r;=-]- L=;jr;¡- o .£;" ....;::0.;;;", ~ y. .~ ;, " "<- IZJ EJ ø 'L. . . ", RdoFí~ _sunup. \ "-.~ ......--....-/.-¡: ~------~~ --- ! :-;-- .~ ~ . . ,'-~ ~J . ...--...---- I ! ...-~/' ..~~-~___ i ""'-----~~ - - -- l:] '" o .()1;J ~ ~ .2J R ~ " ,g 24'-4" o QotJ (E; DAYCA/i£ I..mLEYllLAGE &K'T1..1GHTS AT LOAD~ DOCK aJlLT -LP ~N::;, AT LoADot:;, DOCK MA&6 WALl.. I STONE CO'ÆÆD OlI1'DOORI"IAf<IIŒT"I-\AU..'I..NDERRXF Q..RIÆD úLU-1.AM. FACIA aJLl..T·UP~ SIGH 6AND - SIGNA6£ IiOT A FAP!T SKrLIGI-ITS IN CANOF1' NA"IlRAI.. IlI:JOO P05TS, TYi"'. ,--; B I-EAYr ~FOfi!: I'3EA:1 FRAMING, TTP. t~! I <& METAL 'ZACTIQE' ZINC FINIS!-! FðX:f', TYP. - ="Fl -n -j-' 'I +: f'F<E,..MWR'!' ROŒ EGUIF't1EI'(T, T11". ~ - T' -H rl :c , , p ~ " ~ ; ~~ --- <& lJ METAl.. 'ZACT!QUE' ZINC FINISI-I ~. TYi"'. -).-I t1 TÆLLIS STJiiiOC1\.IÆ A60YE TO LET SlH..1GI-IT .±c - FILTER ~ AT EDGe CÆ- ~ "1J ±-i f:KnJGI.IT OVER CAFE - CW'DOOR SEA~- - STEVENS (EJ W4U. TO ~N L"~~ WHOLE - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --,-- -----------.--- ___. '_'0 __ ~'-$ FOODS - - ~$*, MARKET /~ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ _ ~-~A"') ,::.; - SAND HILL ~ f 1Ø'·4" ~JI'-Ø" l PROPERTY COMPANY """"" "'" - c;¡..ecx$"1'ANDE><rr ~~~ - .~ """ oou.£V"'" - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - ,...- PARKING LOT SIDE WITH ENTRY FEATURE - WEST ELEVATIO~ rœ Ko Architects, Inc. 900 High Street, Suite 1 ~ ø PaIoAlto,CA 94301 p:650.853.1908 f: 650.853.1$45 - - - - - - --- - - - - - - .", r'" r'" é,\ :¡~[ -(~[ -¡~[ '-j---' ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~t.~-~r··· .~ ,--~'t i: ~ ~'-$o~4" -.- NalTIIE1.1.~EI..B'1EWT~$TEYeI6CJ1œB(.5..VC:>I"~LOT ~~eEATINI:!t 1IT¡.~~"I1'IG_ - - - -- - ~ ~.- - KEY MAP EB STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD STREET SIDE - SOUTH ELEV A TlDN ,"". 2 - - L ~~a.EO~~ ~~TOMATc'!lLAßAT -~.........,.. ~==:::: CMJUl.l.U..ATa.A.CXSIDE ~ LIGi-IT.~. . I~C~; 28'_$ ill - I : 8 ~ ~"--, - """"" , .;:.:;:... i . . ~."...,...., i ,_......",;I , ~ . '--'." --," '-:.-.-. ,.,.--", - -'-~""" - - .. -- -. ., ~ """'-- - - _(E) W4U. TO I " """"'" """" ~ - - - $"TE\ÆN&aEEK!!IL.VC:> ~ """"""" f'!.AM<I<;sœt11TTAI. 5EP'IB"EER23.WZ5 C~ ~¡;e!'i.Ø1fTTAL OCTOBER 14, 2ØØ5 - - - - """"""....= NO'\IEI"eERIØ,2ØØS REAR SIDE - EAST ELEVATION ,"". 3 REYlSI(N¡ÆRSTI"!.ICTIJRAL ICV. 30, 2ØØ5 - - - - FLJH<Þ<; ,"""",,,AI. DEC.I&,1ØØS (E)WAL.LTO~IN -~ CMJW4U.A"1'~.IDE _$TONE\lA.U.ATr'IAN ~eTLO.AD1NG OO<X PROJECT lOCI. Ø5-SB - 1.-.--- ___.n.__.__. "._~ ~~ AI1::à15T 4, 21t1œS DRAWl! BY U ~ I ~ 1116" = I'-ø" :.. . ~ ~ I i~ ~ ~ OVERALL SKEEl - - ~ .q'-~ 1/2" ~ ~-.w I SctEMATIC AS4.0 - "'""'" D~LOT IIULDI'IG CK ".111' I'\AR-I~y B..EV A TIONS - - REAR SIDE WITH LOADING DOCK - NORTH ELEVATION 1116" 4 @KOARCIIII&TS.,c. WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. 900 High Street Suite 1 o PaIoAlkl,CA 94301 p: 650.853.1908 f:550.853.1845 /- ,. ~ - ----".. I I L i I ":1/' :', --7~' -:~ -- - - - RPAD ASOYE '", 'CJ 1 - >~-:~ ". "f- I I \ I i '- V ~ J\ : 51c1\TT\ I I \ t I \ ¡ J \ t I \ f / \ I I \ I / --AJTUÆ __ _'ç ¡. ------1 ZZANJNE ~ I ME AREA [ I ~ I I I I I ~ / 38'_ I '- PREP F<=5\ ~'_ø" KlTCI-IEN\ LOGO &1úN AREA A60VE 51G.N.A6E NOT A PART ROOF LINE ASOvE 2Ø~ LOW WALL WITH LANDSCAP!NG ~.- '- I3A<ERT\ ~. ~ Jc:A5i-!-UP , ~ F\...A'tI~ 3B1ITTAL 5EPTE"eER 23, 2ØØS FUH<tIO -.e11TT" OCToeER 24, 2ØØS '"""""'....CIT1' ~1Ø,2ørre 1i'51S!CN5f'ER5"1Rrn1RA1. t<IOV'. 30, 2ØØS FLAltiNGIi£SlS1ITTAL DEC.1&,2ØØS I'IIOJECTNO.~313 ~n ..aLI::".U5T4,2ØØS ou._rr IJ - J~2' .1'-0" SCl£MATIC SHEET STREET AS4.1a B.EV A TION @KOARCHlTECfSIMC. ~.- EB KEY MAP STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ~ ~.- ~ KITCHEN WlTI-I 6ALca-rr AI3O'Æ WlTI-1 seT6ACl< TRANSL.UCENT UJlNDc::u.J& WNDCWS - - SCHEMATIC ELEVATION@STEVENSCREEKBOULEVARD 131.32 "2'-Ø" LOGO &IGN FACE ~ CAFE lUTH 0lJ'TD00R SEATING -------- _8 n ^ "'''' (/1"-' v u -- -- ~ J"'-~' ---- ---- ",,-",,"=,==.o=-=¡--= i-¡-:"--¡~- -ñ---~--·^- ,'" (/1"-' v u OPEN ~AT TRELLIS AT END a: ROOF 5TFaJCTUIõi1.E. ~ÇN' &..AT5 -RECYCLED PRODUCT (A "GREEN" 6UILDIN:::;, PRODUCT) 5I..OFED METAL CAoNOF'T' ·ZINC" COLOR, "GREEN" SUILDJNG. F'RQD\.ICT 5TRL1C11JRAL "TREE&" . NATURAL WOOD FOL.E CON&TRUCTION WlTI-I WOOD 5TRUTS (6RANCI-+ES) FOLDrNC:< 5TOREfRONT 5Y5TEM -- "NANA WALL"- TO c;opa..¡ INDOOR TO OUTDOOR ~ ~ W'-!>· DRIVEWAY MEZZANINE 6ALCONY FOR ADMINI:;;TRATla.I OFFICES LATTICE ~FOR Fl.~RINI;:J vINES CMJ WALLS WITH PAINTED 6rucGO FINI5I-\, TYP. "CUPERTINO ORQ4ARD THEME" MOSAIC ~ TO 6E PROVIDED 6"'- O\I.NER SLOPED METAL CANOP'f FOR 6I.N Pfõ?ClTECTION. rTF. NAT1JRAL TIM6ER F'OLE5<5£ALED) WITH CONCRETE BASES, T'r"P. 36' HIGH STa-IE 6ASE, TYP. L<::::GO SIGN - NOT A PART OF SU6MITTA!.. +36'-0' CORNICE COMF'RISED OF SLAT&, TO MATo-! SLAT& U&ED ON PROJECT AT EN1'RT" AND ~-MAINTAIN A TI-EME OF MATERlAL.&~ rrPlcA!... OF ALL ÇORNICE& &HOlLN. WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. 900 High SbeaI Suite 1 , Qi PaIoAl1o. CA 9ß¡1 p:650.$53.1908 1:650.653.1845 r.;::;. '0 -,.--, , i IJ I LOGO HONI.MEN'T SIGNAGE SIGNAGE NOT A PART -- -~- -- - ~-- _.. TRELlJ5 ELEMENT ALCJNG. SoTEYENS CREe:::. 6LVD. TYP. 21!1'_!!> NATiJRAL TIH6ER POLE5(&EALED) WITH CONCRETE eASE5, TYP. V PAFð<ING LOT I ) ~.- EB - ~ P D [ i1 KEY ~A , - ,.,-... "" m·· BfI1 :. ,-'.;),'i, .",," ".C,', :.' ,:">_. .. .~.':.::. .:...::~ I.....'..,..'...'...'...... .....'.... ';. :}3:-- ::',\;.".,:7;' : -,::-:::::,:,_-::,;:~- " ," -~..<+..:.,-J _'-!!> 31"· OI..ITDOC'R&EATlNC::. STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD , ~,~____ TYP , ( _ NA ~,' ~ ~--- .r ' ~,~ , ' - - - , ,~ """ ~r" ~ ' . F' f f¡iJ'f. F" _!¿? _ =!'" ' ~ rt ~r'\! ¿ . .-c-cr- . ~ " , -, . ,,-. -y "-'-' -- --.. ~< . --* ' '4' ~L~TAL~ t S,TEvEN5- CREEl<. 6L y,,,,," FA"'" ~ "'" LOT eETOND - :"~ ¡ i ~ ~MIì1! ~- í @¡ TRELLIS ELEMENT ALc;t.IG 5iE'ÆN5 CREEK BLVD, TYP. (~ (~, /" -~ ~ / ì ~ /" (. 0-.. ( "" c;, 0....../ - \(. ,^ « ~ 1 ' -,. "" . ....¡ ~;).:;. I~~.." -~'f';P, -!¿~~-y -----I-!lb----jf- ~~ 1 CAFE WIT" SCHEMATIC ELEVA nON @ STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD T,m. T ~ DRIVEWAY t:~~ ~~ ¿;' ~, ~~ ~ .1* )!j~ . , .1 = . ¡ ~I ~ ~ SlEMmAL 5EPŒI"eER 23, 2~ FlAI'HtG FlEsœMmAL OCT06ER 24, 2ØØ'3 F£YI~ FER crrr HO'.ß'eER WJ, 200S ÆYl51GN5 FER S1'ROC:T1RAL t40V. 30, 2ØØS PLAtf\lNS~AL D£C.I6,:zøø!; NATURAL TIMEIER POLE5<'5EALED) WIT!-! CONCF!:ETE 6A5E$, TYP. ""..," 7 ""-ø" n n n < n, -, NA1URAL TIMBER POLE5(SEALEDJ WI~ CCNC:R:ETE 6A5E$, TYF. -~. 'n '·.ø<V "--1' I'JIO.((;'( 110, Ø5-313 DATE ALr.U5T4,2ørre DRAWII8JU sc.ou: 3132': I'-ø" " . ( r- " . SCIEMA TIC SlEET STREET ELEVATION AS4.1b Æ ~ ~ ~~d ~O" " . ill " . ~/ ~ ~ $TEVEN$ CfiŒEK 6L VD , I ~ '-Ð"TTP. ,...l , m " . "I' ¡; ~ " . , :.( @KOoaam:crs..c. - 2 T f'/4" ~ REQúIRED $TEVEN$ CREEK BLVD SETBACK P,.:\,f;1K/NG l...OT ENlARGED lRELLlS SIDE ELEVATION@ PARKING LOT ALONG STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD , I - 3 r f'/4" &'-ø"TTP_ TYPICAL TRELLIS ELEVATlON@STEVENSCREEKBOULEVARD .J,.. WHOLE FOODS MARKET SLOPED METAl... c.ANOFY RCiI..ND CONCRETE PLANTERS FOR SUN FROTECTION WlLOW FLANTING.&, TYP, TIMSER POlES tUITH CONCRETE eASE, TTP. ~ STONE WAINSCOTT .2ð'-Ø" ~sœH!TTAl 5Ef'Ie"eER23,2ØØS ~ fêESI,.61JTTAl OCToeEFI: 24, 2ØØS § .w'·ø' l'EYlSlCN&PEF<crTY 1t:'h'S'1BER10,2ØØS ~i I ~FERSTl'iOCT1.RAL 1t:JV.3Ø,2ØØS A...A/'ffi:õ RESœMITTAl DEC. IE>, 2ØØS 1£>1'-". ~ 33'_Ø" ,,'..,p Cl-lECK STAND EXIT ENTRY DEMO KlTCI-IEN OOR SEATING. 2 ~.- œ I'!IOJ[C'! MO. Ø&-313 041t Al.tõUST-4,2ØØ!> IIWNB'I'IJ sç,o.¡¡: 3/32'.1'·11>" IiEET AS4.2 .. .- ~.. ~~:- . -~~:¡;~L8~iJ .t9 UJ lr o. ~ = ~.."\" "~~:,\(~)-",t[-~. ~d_. , ~, c=J LtjJ CANDY' .~ _ ~,!!F~. ~iJ .~~' T HAFO<E.T "ALL ~. DEPT [] [gJ [gJ [gJ [gJ [gJ Ç0' NDOOR IIJJ r,~ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA CARTS ^ ^ SEA""" /', ,y) ç;..-:--..J // /, /"'. ~'-Ø..V4·"/ ~-13)'" IØØ'·..· _ ' /, SANDHILL :wALL , V C><ECKSTAND PROPERTY COMPANY .~_ EXIT ~ 1- Ii II ¡ II II 'iI INDOOR SEATINCiI ' E , . -,J11--;rr;-- ---- -. il_u-: 11[1 Jill 11[1 -,."." "il II ' nil '; - H ~ II II " I _, .. --!!..: 1III ri"U·. ijll liil III1 11111111 V 1111 III 11111111 I rœ II. ,.' ,.. . <'U-tl = tdl Ii ,.1 II II II II II II II II II II II .1 1I11 Ii II; ~ Ko Architects, Inc. 1111', ,,) It 11_ j-a II jl 1111 III! IIII II )I l11.....If II I II lilt - ~ 900 High Street 5uile1 Ii II ' u!l' "-.' 1111 ,C;:erTER Il~ 11(1 IhlhTDOORSEA!rM II 1111 OORSEATINi!.II II 11[1 -/- I I I ,- . ^ . till IIjl 1.111. ,Ill, 111./ Ir¡j 1111111 III [II' 11111111 III 1)11111 111111111 '-1'_' ~~' .-!tt-" .. Pak;)AIIo,CA94301 _ /J!r~===...(I;,iC'" J-I;~.."'c..._. ,~'~L~ ';, I\il~"'~ .11.11 '_. .'__~.__~..II.H. III~_ _ ...: ~.II_ .~'_ 11l_-=_.=---:-.__~,.~_II.~~t_ -_' .... _till. _ 1)1 ~II.~__, _=-.JI~~II~_____..dbJlL lJw .+-+-7+ : ~~- ~;~:=~i= . ~c.-~."'.,.r~.---1í!,·'.· '''-7-. '~. '~~,H.... ...--.".....'~.~'-... ~'--' ~~-~- :JiÎ1 ..,-~. ,....'..+r#.-, "T.. '* ,~D ,il ' _~'(I '¡f'¡1 ','fl!- : ··-.,d'~" ...-...-.....?:::::~v .. u~·:-- -~'u~u ~1J 'µ p~' ~'þ" U~L______ JUUUJ 4µ U.i'-, ' 1 ! : - . -Irr. ~t IU~'IJ~r C\11'DOOR!lII ,'!' 'ufí" , IIn:.........."":::::?·; ,. " '~ :, : I"~ i' ~I, ll:f' -. c-i-j-...;¡..~~:i- -41- ¡¡~ Iii 'III I1Afit:;ET IIII ~ 1111 .iUr",,?- ~ , 'I: i ':: .I" Ju... ìJ\L In ~ 1111 -hIALL 1111 . 1111 '>...-.....~-,r. ' I I L060 IGNABOvE ;0-:;' ~ g ~ ~ 1111: 1\ II r II!I _......:;-~~- ~ a I I 5jr.N,V..F NOr A PARr i I ~~ -j'J f!i J Ii 11'1 II I[ ~'¿I .......('"-::::=-:0- c-r , - -----.-,-=--=-~- -~-'- ff -~ -:. f. II Ii U II I~ 11_ -.-.1fi ~ - ----"'-- -~.. ,'- .-t-i I :/Y - 1II1 1I1I-__'---'j1~",---t ~" ~ I :! , r~ - . =="4:= ~--.:t:::::~~ . --- I IL 'c .~! ~"- 'Ii::! -. . ' ',1 '. MkoWALL ¡' .-. I a ~-dd~=...u i ' -;- w ;c~r;.~<~:;~-~~- -f Il·~ ' . I'--~~ 'm .. <~~~ = == _)~..~~~_:_.~/-'"_.._- Rr=c- ------' FA"';¡;¡d,- I ~"~~'èi ¢= ï 2"'" '0 KEY MAP t;;~£:=-..~=-=-== --¡-~i± ~ ~> J : L: ~ANTER5 : T:" ~ ~> ~ CORNICE COMPRISED OF -SlATS, TO MATC!-! SL.AT5 USED CN F'ROJECT AT ENTRY .ÄND ~-HAINTAIN A TI-eME OF MATERlAL5. TYPICAL OF ALL COfõ3'.IICE5 SI-IOU.N. CMJ OR T!L T -UP CONCIõ£TE wALLß. TYP. LOGO SIGN . &IGN.AGE NOT A FAF'IT . 36'-Ø" - - - Î SCIÐIATIC ENTRY FACADE B.EV A TJON -~.::.u r-['.._.~ t-t>____ _------... --<;::::"-:.)] :~ . LP L~ ON EIiTRT' FEATUFi:E LOI.I'ICRS ANDNTEFiNALLTLtT~ i1J.IOL.E FOCOS l.œD SIGN· HOT A PART aRVED GLU-LAM r- ~AI.. 5lATA.0JVEFi!5 TO MATCW HORIZONTAL SIJ'{ Si4ADES USED AT .ADJACENT CANCf'Y - 1õ£CYa.£D f'L.A5TIC IlIX'O F'F!OtOCT ('GREEN' alILDtt:i PRCOJCT) ¡-1OCIODT1õiJSSUlTJ.lt'ETALCANOf"r J B.l1L.T-tP ROCf eEYQIID --I ;I; ~ t ~'.~-- c _ _H~I-I~ _ _ ~ARD~CE~ _ STc:tœ c.ova<ED MA551UAl1. I-IORIZa(TAl5LAT~ - ~CL£D w::x:o F1'OD\JCT ("...". eoJILD'" F1'OD\JCT) / ,"' TAU. >lA1\RAL ""'" POLE / / m,001E~ -~ - @1\II.urc..-n;C'lSINC. 1 r f3/3:2 SCHEMATIC ELEVATION @ MAIN ENTRY WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko An:hitects, Inc. 900 High Street. Suite, e PaIoA/I(J,CA94301 p:650.85J.1908 1:650.853.1845 SoLOPED METAl.. CANOPT" OPEN WOOD SL,AT TRELLIS "ORCI4ARD" CANOPY "TREES' FOI..E CCN5TRUCTION WITI-I Uk:X)O 5TF<11T5 (6RANc1-Œ5) ---I ~..-..-S L......;~'''....-..... ~ ,~._~"ì ~~. h ........... ~ ¿' - t~ tt:!1~~ ~ - < ~.-~ ~ ~ \ß l' ~v ~ , W' ~ é --'1, >( '¡. ;5 <' c:~~ (-' .. '"r~c:::::"' { , ;:, \, , " r TRANsPARENT 5TOREFRONT DOOR 5"(5'1'81 - NANA WALL SYSTEMS ---------- SCHEMATIC ELEVATlON@CAFEENTRY ¡;;:;:-r2 - ,-----1- " r",-ø' - E '" ~. D- ? - m --¡: ROUND CONCRETE PLANTERS WILo.LI FLANTINGS, TYP. \ 7,\ ~, \ /",-ø. - - , UP LIGrtltt5 CH EN'!Rr ÆATl.IFì£ L.ctJ\1ER5 AND ~ y LIT &IGNA6E UHOI..E FOODS L.OGO 5~ - NOT A PART ORÆD GLU-L.AM I-IORZCmAL !il..ATILCJ.J\IERSTOMATo.I I-IORIZONTAL 5Ui SWADES USED AT ADJAŒNT cmopr - ~crClED FLASTIC IIXXO PRODUCT ("GREEN" aJIlDINGFRODJ;::T) lOC1OD1'IõIJ&5tu"Jì.lI"ETAlc;..lNOF'T 6UILT-'JP RC(;f æTctC 25'-0" ~' , , , , , ,..,' , , , , , , , ~.- EB KEY MAP STaE CO'ÆIi£D MA55 WAJ..1. IGIRIZCNTAl 5lAT5it.0lJIÆR5. Æcra...EJ ILi.?OD PRCPUCT ("GÆEN' 6ULD~ F'F/ODOCT) r ,..TAlLNA"""'-"""'F<'LE ~ F'LAI'tIN:S 5Uer1ITTAL 5EPTE"'E\ER 23,2ØØ5 f'L..,ðHfiõ: ÆSl.EitlmAL OCTQ6fR 24, 2Ø0S ~F'ERcrrr HO'YS"EiERIØ,20Ø5 ~F'ERS~ ~.~,2ØØ5 R...AI+IHG RESl61ITTAL DEÇ.I&,:wøs EN..ARGED $ HEEl PARTIAL S 3 ELEVATIONS A 4. - ÐITRES -~ I'ROJ£CT NO. tJS-3ß D.01t Alt:õIJ&T4,2Øtæ DUoWNII'rIJ - @~ J: ¿r;~ e'-Ð" J SCHEMATIC ELEVATION@MAIN ENTRY 1--;;;-r1 T o o £L ? rn~D1§)~¡~~IE~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = T J ~.,~. ;.. ....,....:. .':'," ,'," ..," ..'..... ..-, ,'.:' " ,-.:,': ".,.', ," ,1$iÌh ---r<.-e:. ""' ~' . __L~~ o o - , ~u~j ~.,~ : 7-' ~r-L-.J "'_" ..c . ._~ . '-- '_ ___,. _ . -.- = T -., o ~ - U'_1"TYf". -.- ~.~ - ~ = ~ = , c::::::::: I i ¡ :: = = = = cART ""'""'- -. ,.- WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CAUFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. . 9OOHighStreet,SuIte1 PaIoAllo,CA 94301 p:650.853.1908 f:650.853.1845 KEY MAP ~.- E9 3Ø_~ ------ ~ ~ uu. ~~~ V"y ~ 1 C; ç A ~~ . " , ~ ~ r"0' SLOFED METAL CANOPY OPEN I!J:::'OD SLAT TRELLIS .. _.,.. ...._ __ . u_.__ Q o Q '" l~ -.. -.---- 1 '-II" "ORCI-!,ARD. C.éNOPY ''TREES" POLE ÇONSmJCTION WITH WOOD 5TIõaJT5 (6R.ANCHE5) - - I'IIOJW NO. /æ.3/3 ~~ AOOIUST4,2ØØ5- DllAWNIn'U - 1/2" .1'-Ø" 20'-0' STEVENS CREEK 5ETBA.CI< 5TE\1EN5 CREEK I EtLARGED SHm PEDE5TF<!IAN WALKWAY 8LYD PARTIAL AS4.4 ELEVATION - CAFE ENTRY - WOOD CANOPy DETAIL@ CAFE ENTR~ @I«IAIICHßtC1'$M:. ~ ~ 5lEMfTTAL 5EPŒM6ER 23, 2ØØ5 R....AI+IN:;~AL OCT06ER24,2øe:6 ~PERGITY ~1Ø.2ØØ5 ~ F"ER 5TRJCT\RÁl NOv. 30, 2ØØ5 ~Itt;oFiiESlS1ITTAL DEC.I&.~ q TRANSPARENT 5T~ DOOR SYSTEM - N.ANA WALL = SYSTEM '? ~ :~~I: '¡ 14'-(Ó" J 1¡Ó'-Ø" L " i:! CAFE OUTDOOR 5EAT!NC!o AT WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY 1d ~ _Ck<'~~ l.ant:isQpcArr:hj~ L'!851ÑAI>.......~2l11 Hmfase,Úllifomi;¡!ISa ø.H1.7fJW ~_.1:!II!_.uuJ lIE'.""''''''' EB KEY MAP \1 ~ 70" ,{jU mrmm, III i Il31 ¡'II è)tr' : 00 .0 ~ - - .... .... .... ~'" - + - ~ - i> 01 . - - - ~i ì -'-.----- -""""'" ~-~. ~ !"'AVER STQE ~ œ;! ~ ~ + i> -W JC .A..)'--T Qrfrmm ~ ,¡. ~ ~ '..j ~ i> (' · , z · > < o Z J J · " · ci z / aOULEvA~D ~ PlANNlNGSUBI.IITlAl SEPlEMSER23,2tJ05 PLANNINGRESUBt.lITTAL OCTOOER 24, 2005 REVl90NSPER an NO\Ðl8ER10.2005 REVlSI()$PERSlRUCTlJRAl NOV. 30,2005 PLANNlNGRESUBt.llTTAL DEC. 16.1G1J5 ç¡g....oRf" .f«I.ÆCff«l. ffi DATtDEC.16,2ûQ5 ."_8'1 GGI =. 1~-O" CONCEPTUAL SHEEf LANDSCAPE PLAN AS5.0 @"O~IItC. - ,.-.,....... ........~ ~ ~ ~.~ - - - - - ,_ .--- ..__ "...,.l.Jlyd__ ~ ,..., ""-- -~~~ ~ ,&AI. _....~..._ D¥\I ,- """"L"'"P'" .....""'11......... ,...... uw_..~_' "'-...._ ,.sa~.... ~ ,.......-~ -......- ,60<. _..~. ~_.._ ,...L -~-IW>!' >¥"""...... ....., """"""'L"'-''''-' I¥""........ ,- _...."-.~_. --, ,- "-5P<'!I"'Doo«"""""" PI<.__o.g. I_:NM.<_ __.... ..... _........~- ....- '...l ............._ -..y_", ..... "-op. "".. '..., -........ _.. I±tj ~.~~._~ STEVENS CREEK. ---.--' -~ ~>uogoo._- --.....- -~. .......-- ""'-""-' "..,......-.....-.. ---~~"'9__. ____ ~__.......,....o.o.r ~r__ """-......-. 1"IMp'e.....- ~........._.._'.0Nrl' ___.,.....T-" -........- -....---- -..go--~- 1- ~~~ L.o_T.....,..._ -- L-'!I_'_ Paving Legend [j'j ~""""_-~~_eutC ~ _.."_.,,,....____0:>..<lOI........., -~ IBL.oIlÐ'O-T1'?>_ Plant Legend ~~- .~ .~, .~ .~, .~, .- ._, .~ .~ ._, ._, .- t"C._L...__ C2D ....-- - ~ ~ -'- ~--_. -- -- u.ø-- ,_ """'-<>"0' ~..,.....~...,.. -- .....-- ---- ...-- ....'1.."""""11- -'- -.- ~-- -'- -......-.. ~- .~, ---.... "'Þ'''~_ .~, ~....~. -- .~, -9'-_'_ ---.- ,............3·togto ,~'. Eoocol.....'~· ~......_..... ._, _"'I;"f.~.-· ---. -, -~- -..- ~, -- ......~ -, _G__...... ---... ~- - """'" ;;0;;;;- o o ~ o ,.~- = T~__ ŒX> I WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY rœ Ko Architects, Inc. . 9OOHlghStnlet.Suè1 PaIoAno,CA 94301 p: 850.853.1908 f: 650.853.1845 \]] _.- KEY OAAP œ - """""""""1. 5EPÆI'EER 23, 2ØØS .........._AI. OCTGI!!Ði! 24, 2œ& ..."..,......= ~1I>,2ÐØS ~F'ER5TJU:TlR,ðL M::7oI.3Ø,211/1111S """""_AI. DEC.1r.,2ØØS _.- PIIOÆCI' 110. c&-3B E9 DATE Al.Gl&T4,2£IeI& DRAWllIII' eL - NT> PRO.ECT 11111 ,~ RBIJBIIIGS AS-7.0 @1tO~K:.. VlEW@STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ......._'" VIEW FROM PARKING AREA 'a" , ' '.... ".....'...>.J., \," -' EE3. diameter Bay Laurel :,., 36" looking west ~, ";;:;~... 1Z ~ Z005 , 9 so'u't" .. .... ._ ,f'y, ';'\ '''Pi) Rear yard 100 Rear looking west, church playground behind wall ìl-.,,,Ä:* :, ;;,¡;\);;{ ';'1i""'J~:;i'1J WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALlFORNlA SAND HilL PROPERTY COMPANY tœK'''''''_''~ . 9¢<'...,.._s.-",' __,c..9<30' ;>Øð(I,!ð3'1IOI! f'6508$3,'eo!! - ,IT \1 M '~ : ,'" ! ~ ,,'/' I ,~-A% ' ,-_._.---t~=-:.:..'.::-~ KEYWAP ffi PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ---_._....--_.."._"'_._------~- ...-~;¡:---~~-:-~n._ ~~¡¡. ~J04._ IFIII~~_~____~,.·- ..--.."..... ---..--- .....- --_..._~- .._-_._-_._~- -- -..,..." --..-..-...."...,.- .~~-~~'-~ -'P-.' "",. '·'.~··ø· --- .. ___n _____.~___ PI!ElMWIY um SITE PlAN AS1.1 . SIELL IILDGPlAN " ~ .ól.eULA ""QN5 ~'!"E ,""",,'" '!SI;;II¡£."';; ~..t- .,ç.""!\ ')4'.~"" 5/" ~, ""QE&'''3~~'; "'- ':"::I«E~'IWI:'~ SO, I~·' !\.,......'-~ ~"..~-" .....-.$ , e~Ai...'.~ · · · · \ ~ E",·t\Y"'"" !I<I'i..::>_ ! U ~""e.T_ ~_::>,..,.. !!">db"_ ~OI"G }-:;:.......I , t~ i " +-~ -. ·_.._'''__L''''''''''~ ';'¡' \. ::...,~...""""" ~~"~~ .....""""-... -....,..,,~........._.....'" -OIK'-"'C''''''....'''....-.... ,/._-~'"'........ /. /_ :':.._~.::.._.o ,/ ...."""- /" .-.---.--...>""........"..........- I ~"''''"''''^''''''"'''''''~ / ~"",-""""",,". ~ .ttâr=-·~~~=:~~~:~~~ - @;~ ",. ,~~. .I"~··'·.·I~. ---- oJ' / ,/' .I! 1 . " , " : / / ~ '10.,' '. I . . . / ri ' -~_. n-,-A --"1 !', A -~ ___c""""~.:.-'-"__ ;' f='-' ,..! J. i.,.' I. : ," i ¡. .""'j:: / ~- i¡, .__ / c,~.~~!-fI&;-~!~ ," - ,¡ ~f-~! .' /. . . . '1' .! ! ~ ¡ i~:,~ ~ . _ ! , ". "; .' -t' _......~..... t, ........... . [ . '~..... .' ' -- ,,;--. . <.1£/.. " ., . '.. .!' " ' I I' " -. f 4 - M.. L.....,...,..:.... ,¡'., Il I ,'ð W [_:: TI.· . ~~~~C!~ -~I-'-' ï~ ;Øi ~I-"! L I~T"" I):¡.I ". .-: j , ' !&Ð ,...- _ . . _ -SOO;.f;-.:" ~II '..·.'1.-.-. I ; I ... ....".--" -- , '":. ¡" ]---;'" ',.. .. -- .---'- ---".----:-'--..- , ~,::.I:' ,,,,,,__,,,,,2... '4>._ ~""'Å'~~'" .¡JI~... .... 'i' _'I' _.~,O':::".'" __ ~'"':"W ~ ;:V-'T~Wf"r~~-' ¡ .:-'::"" ~z:rANI'ELE""'''''·~&J' t" i, I ," ': '! - , I, I I ,1 ,,"I' .i().'" . -ra-.......e,:...ef. ... t- ..." .. ....~. ' _..~.-,.. '---....,.....+. ..-~,.,.,.,J ~ ~ j _~(T;'....~~""t...~~_ ~_. 4~..·::;- t )'-..., ~~: ;: ,'- ,-" . !...1. l::~¡' l~ .:,~-=··~·::7~':..:::;·\.;:Li:wr;·':~~t-~·¥, ..,~;::~~.~~ ~_._____.__ ~...._ .'~~'_;~i.~~..- '." ..........._...._ ,. . ~- ,.- ",..~. ,,,,," ....!.._." _,..-..~~_~___ _ ..._~ ",' I ¡ , I' \ I ! , ,~.. ¡~_. 'aoco-____ _.__ I __~ ¡-hi: j L.........~. .:.. ,1' : . ¡ i " ¡ .. 0' : -+-".'~---j- .--n.'.----f--- ..,.- __ II. . "1 ~......-e_ptWo I~~:~' .~, i =~~~...--- I ,~ '";;~~~". < i _ ¡ .. +'" : . : I ' 'tit 1· " - -L-=:t"~~ ~-----i-- v ;::- -----4-""7"-- " .,... -$' '(þ, t@-!~· ! ~, ..0' ß< I ' _~V , ,v-, . )- .. ' , ¡ , 'I " .. f)- ÎW""~ ;' \ .....'"""'-0 ~'í.'¡ ," '....... !". «;'-.7-.' . ; ! " a. D'N:> \". ,.,. . 7-' . - "_,__ =",,-" .~. ,____ .; -~~-~i0l- ------ - - i.';" ../v\>~:,i.o'""\ -J~..."-'--': <··t )- µ, A" "... ,\ " ' ~ ~~.- .'_'-' \.// ,: ",:;',; ~..,'_ . . r .~~ ~; ,-",.~....,,I !:L7 ~.> '<~, ~/'''''\'''^ <{. ~ .,__. __.. ., , . Li~.;. -'- " "I ,--'- " __ .--/~'-----/~¡ ~___dii="'" ", ~~,]11 '. .' \ \ '" .~:;,,~j~:!- <, ,. '=----- ==--~---\- ' -~~...,~:,.; .,~ ~--=-- --='-~.._=. \ ""........,.. ,-- """"..,.........,_.......... ¡ STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD --~""':-=-_: ---=: - 4.~ -----,( '~.~ ~--'Io ~j' ~ . j" WH FO( MARKEl' .' CUPERTINO, CAUI'ORIiWI SAND HILi. PROPERTY COMPANY 11""_,"', .9011"'9>__, _-.CllIo<3C1 ¡r_t$l.'!IDII "_-"10& 1"-- Ji' ¡~ ~j~~ ~~,~ 1> .._ KEY WAf' EB --"---, PROGRESS PRJNT . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i(:llj' ...~~ ·..·J£,X4 ¡~-- ( ... iii::H'~-~-¡;;,ji- PARIONG LOT SIDE wîTH ENTRŸ'¡;ÊÄru~STELEVATION i.-~ 1 /~' " I~ . ,........."O_~_-, -------------{ -- -----\~ 'f/~'- ~., "r' I I ~ '~\I <"·i',~~,~~!,r~·~, I ,,¡, I ~-- -- '" '~,....i¢ ..;;1 "',ii __ t,d'~ f."; _ ____~ _ _ -.f. '" ~, ~ ~ ~ -=-------=-= ~~~~~..."'..;.;;;.-.m _ _ _ :t:;;; ~~::.;.~ ~-¿"---;'~~~'faG_ _ ...-::__ ~"'~~ .1<---."" ~_____,.___...!!!!:.':'I!"_.,.__.___._ STEVENS CREEK BOUlEVARD STREET SIDE - SOUTH ELEVATION I ~... 2 ~~ ----- ~ . - ;¡::¡;¡:;¡¡¡;¡"Ul'rnAi. -.- ....- _r.... ~...- ~~_E -;¡¡;;-~~-?_.~~. ~..- ---.--.- -----.. ---- --~-- --_._._--_.~- ---_..__._--~".- ...._'-~-_.._-- '".,,", "'. p".~! .'-.--- ·~'T .=:---~.-,~ "'~..,;. .~--- "" '''''"''-4' - --~ OYÐIAU. $lEEr -"" AS4.0 BUI.OING ELEVATIONS ,'.- -.---- r-'~~- ,----,,",,-,"'" ; í ,--- . I II """ .,;.. ~;: _: 0"· - - - - -- - - - -.--..--- - - - I~¡;;:-:*' ,---_........",..". I ,-,." / =-..~ , §Š -- ~-- ¡.....................,. / ~~.."'/ / -, - ~ ---. ,1/ ..'..-...'~- / /"'--- , / // / ...............c.. ~ / / ._~.> ( ",~".;", ",FÒ~Ò~ I '.,;> ~':...,..' r--- ............, ..-...", I I I WHOLE ~DS .KET ~.CAlIFORNIA ;:~DHH..l ~COMPANY ."";-,,~ ""'-,-, _a.I<!OI ,ø ,.......'e06 I J J 1 I I ; -I I I _:;-Ai..' F;,;,"""" 'ZZAHN! -. ~~ , \ \ e.oI.c:GI'iYAec:>"" , '---"'''06''''"," -'lOE~..ew..",·~c_ - '"'"5.... "=~ \ +- .....c;.e..-. ~~ ~-- i --, ---:-~ """"'~'" ðE.>'''6 ""="'6 --~".. -- ft- , . ,.. "~ ~. "'.... PROGRESS PRINT NOT FORCONS1'RUCTION STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD -a<..L.....Ui..,."....'NTW / 61="""'''.'''''. 1/-.-- "1-£!"!I!:''"IOð4<:.4Rf'~ / =N:~I~"'" 1-<XiC_.o;cT" //r=I'1I!.TAI...~ ~~au5'<lnAl,. / / ~._~T;,"" ,æ,'_Ð" / / / ~ NA~ n-eE1I / f / ~&(~~~;"''''" , . ~~.""T",-"O·-o· ~~'_6TQo111! . <~....... CO!Nc:ti~M:QŒ"""T& '"O........C>!&..."'T&~ooi-. ~~~:~~ \, Œ"'ATE!IiI....6c.;;;~~ \ \ ~' ~- \ ~~.IiI. __»,_ ~_... ~~- "'-I'!IIIQIT _If._ -- - -- - - __ft.3I!I ---- ~.~~ -"'. ~._'.;~:. --.--.--.-. SQEIIA11C lIEn S1ÆÐ a...""" AS4.1a ~.,,-='"' .~~ '"1I!~eAi..~""F(:'O! <,Çr1"",e"'/U.T"""""'C1:;6 ~"'''''''ce~FCIIi "'-~v;>E6 _11'--- !-:~-. ~ ¡þ. , ". ~ i c· -+~~í =, ~;;:¡ - -- KlTco«N""¡'; ~¿;:;;;¡:,.-~ "IIt4NIILxe.;~ ~ $~ ..--., ......~ - 1iIOOC~<:oIiO~""'" ~eTOlL'T&f~) "GU)_6T~T&~ere-·-- -... __.."·TO ""'I!'<-...;:>oCOI w_ ~ Þ-- L _ ~~~;:-;,~.;~;;." ~-=-~- --- -'.--- r-' - -"- -". ,,?-~~~;.- , " C>"'SN$;.4T_~;6AT!tØ0f' 1OCCF6TOU::......., "ëG»!"6!.."'T& _.e;y=~.f.. ~'!IU:1..D_~~, 6LOf'ED>"I!......~·Z""'·_--,_· ~OIO.'GR!!E>i·!IO.I'L"'tNo:, ~.;CT , _~._.--;~'~ ~,,'_.4,-.Þ<"""( . ~^.o>, ;"'..-- ,~....,..,......-,-- f---- r ¡ ! , ì 1 , WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CAlIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPA."!Y taKa"""- ,'~ . ::,,:,~~' .,þ,m.IOIJI ,,-<~ rc----~- ¡~ ~]11 0==1- ...~ KEY ...,.,p EB ¡ PROGRESS PRINT I I NOT FOR CONSTRUed -'. "":'~S"",,", ~...t-'1E"'~ -':'SS"<!oS' i; =~ ee...'·,«> ~ ~=C<.¡¡ ~....~ ~.t:i_ -.:x.rvø ~ ~ ..--#" T·--~·^ ~OCI'II:.iN'...n.:\,., .' V ""'i~-C",::,~J-Jlf~:.L:~::¿¡i .: ~ ...- \..' /-~ :'i·-~~~~"-it' nr-~'7---, ~ I ""'_.......' l!\ I ~lfâ::q .-.'i '. \ ~ ~:~ ~ \_ ~-< .._ l__~ <"-~~~!>E~T'r'P'. . ""7DOO!'I!~~""" '-----~~~~~ \ 2Ð'Lai.'.....~ "'I........,IN<ioAlc:>MATI<o ~-~-LANC~1P70 2~!..O.liuw..~ -'II;:P.H;:)~T!!~ IØ.<:'.iI!"I,.ANT_,T'r'P'_ ......,.,...v I I --. ---._-,""..:£---'._-~_.- ~TMC' . ~; -. "'P<::x:><ISEAT"6 i"'" ~ -- ~ = =OOR,*",~ ~Ji-·.1-'_-_c.,o'.~~",,_~~_ ..oO./IIQN6!.O'1" . """ * ~~,-<--~ //. . >'/~, j;/ I ~/~ ~/.. -~', I r r .~~~~~ / \ (',~E';<::et<"",,!II "'~ ~..<:aAt.~ F~; lr" :>~- I j." ",,: _i_l',!:~ , ,_ ..-¡....~ .. .c-+··_"F··k~"):::::: , (,_.,~ ... '¡, v' ..,¡,. ~ ;!' ¡ Ii: ¡: i ,:: . ' ~ ;!!_( : = ., c__" _ 'f .. . .'. .._- -,- . ,.. ,." ,'." '- ,,;. '3' , ~./ ~'.' '" ... ¡:~, ~jd -~ :1 I_~~-'f .·~t{ 1·- ,~_~-~ ~,.-----t-7.~""F=-' ''1':'''''' - ~--¡, . I ,// ' '*'-. :~"- ii _~..~=hr-~::J: ;~' ~ !i"-=-~"""'\-"- ,l----.., .,¡. >.,.' ~/'.' :,.. ,,::_.. __."_,~,_",,",,,,",,_===..... t:L.c.! Œ~~,~;'~...._ __ --'- ?:~/ ----- _~~~ð£p<»9L....1'&.TQ..,,.:.1'O_I!oW>.T$ / ~~T:,~æ¡-~~,.....1V<1.1L&, 1/ '''~ÇAl .,.....~ ~'ae SoI<OI>'. ~!O!:UoC~PI.."'''~ I r-O"\;"'""'-'-~,"""'. ! Il;/I..OOI P\.A.'.rrNG6.T'?". /, ¡ ,~vE!O:TK:oOL.9L.A.T$, / / 1.-~O::óO~_·S--....r.ENC"'A"&.R! I ' \<IE~~_~¡ON / ' / " !'GR~ /./ .-,»-_.,. / / / / / / / .I / ,..~'.e j .' -T-' '/' ._.C' -t_ "'. ..............~TøE<X>.tIIEØrI<ð5---.. ,__._....___....~"'e."1!t"~'!IÆ~ I ; ¡I/<;-'¥~"'!MkoI(f I J-:;~~~= ,/ i------Uð.£~""""'_·>CIA.._ : ! ,-»'1"'-L'IA'!\A<;.~1'a.!' / / r--a.!MP::;¡,;¡..... ~~ALCM-OOf"T I I / ,¡_~"'-&.:.·t~1O.....·0< !..1'OIt_PI'OTE:::-nON I í ..- t =-....~~~~~ 'I / ; ! '~IUo.DM,~T' / /;--n-eEJIi:~S-"TW I I ! !, __øo.:>_u,.'V....~ ~~~ II 1/ Ii' 1!Lii!.·....,.,.ee--CIC ['-~ ~--- ~-~~ I J . r'! r'1 - ,. I n-"") ~lW" ¡. I I / """" ~~Al _~_ ..__-.eI"'T'.... (;ÇIQ(I.1...._ ____II .__c;r'" ~..,.- ----.---- ~~~~ "'''~'- ~-"-_.._.._----- SClØATIC 111ft ENTRY AS4.2 FACADE EL£VATION 0 <'I .,'c !II __ ----~-- --l-._._.._~___ EN"""- :>~><'.:::>If>< ;>''1"=t>e¡..T''''6 ,L____ ,''''. .I " T . " -~ Qe:x6TMC:IãX" .~ ",~, , 'r-~ WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY II""A_~' 1Iœ"",_s....' . "",,-,QO.":!(I' ...$5<>.lJU,,'JO! "OI$;,S53.'av.; !..r---, .iI'...~- i...., 1~ 4>'1 µ. ,: L-P------f ! , I "~~r I " ,.,.. _,__,_' U'u_~_""_· KEY &04...... EB ~ ~____ ~~!l£TlõF'\.."'-'ITS'~ io.I!.O\;~...,,,.._.~. -------~,. ~ / / ,-- j PROGRESS PRINT ~OT FOR ~SlRUCTlON ~5IB"f'f0l.~~_ .;v.-!lE!ll.Ø'm.... ~¡..- ~1"ERC!'" ~.,¡,,_ -,--~ --.--- ..--....--...----.--....-.---. --- -.-.- -..m...ø·~_. ..~ ....-..1;",_ ----- ......'1.0 ---- "-'.. "".".IY' -T·"'·"""""'''' ........... I PARTIAL 3 aevAT10ftS AS4. - EHmES --'~' ~v ..' SCHEMATIC ELEVATION@CAFEENTRY 2 /- .~--- &'00£~"IotoIIoe'........ ________ !o1"~_O'B<N'I!.Io~JlfllElA'\ÐI!I / r~--- ~""'·.<.._!LA'V..a.__·'lECT'Q.ED>OX> r RO~'_"_ / / ~,~.!ilJlLpI<iÕ~, / / IIIo«1E~Lœc_.1C'..~.... / / r- »T"'-I.....~=PC:>..! / I ORÆO~·~... / / I / I I_~'A~.~'O~~ ¡ / /! =:::"-~~=~~. _/ t---- ~..,-------- - -- - _/---,1" / ! .--'~~' ~Ui';-LI;_~~_T¡_ _ _:'_ ___ _ r__ _ __ / _ /_ /J1/ í-~;::''''~~ / I ""'--~ ~I--=.",- ~- --- - -- ~ 1---- - I~ - -~ ¡ / {H / !-=:....~--=- ~~~1r~~-~ - - - ~ ~- ==-=--- ~ -:'" - -~ , ~V' L "'" ~L~ ~ ~ ITm:0 <;'.v,rr -"7"'" ~ ~ ~ - . --~~W (, 0~~ 2 ßf?\'/?,\,-í ',,\ I :'j11 1,\' 1)1 ~r- I -r ~T- ==i,: _ ~ _____ ~;;:;;;=,,¡::----=--~_à\')\\, ~JUi ;:,-- I '--~ ~ ~v'I~¿;~ '\$, '~~~ -ry;--,¥',,~----':~~' -~;¿ 'I § --il )~-~\.~- ~~ ¿~-~--=-== ... LC '-' ~~ ~ ~_-::~~, t"--=-=-¡ , - _ ,,' - _ ~~..::-- _-=---- ¡~ ===---5" I I.... =------~..:...- ~I/ ---==-' , : li"'.'_;.k J I' 1'1 i! ' . ".. I. I'· ,'. I r~M'l:- - ~I ,I ,\'!!J......l it:l, J~-~"'~'1,r~~;'-=i ~!: :.\..'j I '."" 1;, . " ,I. ,11:'1 -",,~,.," .l.._~--,-. ·,·'.1 \ . ,',- h '-- ~, ',' ~ ' --.-..-.--=,~,,~ --~........,-"" ~-::æ ;']'1 -[,. ,==~ -'è. ;~- ,,,"" . h ,j ~ ,-,-,",,"" <....-,f'", ! --=:::==:=::::-.:::: I I WHOLE I FOODS MARKET I i 'ERT1NO, CAUFOF SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY ~ G~gG.Ing&AæOl."idIt!S l_"",,~ '''''"__,r,, ...._r..-...'" ....."'" .,......- ~r---li tk1l_:Jj KEY '-lAP EB e " -.......-. ; .~ .. - "__IIB"I"T'" _u_ "'t..MMC!."..,..-rAl OCIG'EI"'_ <IE__~~"".- -'-~-"----- -------"_._"_..,-,---~- ----.-.. -....-.-----..-----. _.....36 ...-.--- ".~ ~"-- ___.____...u_. ~--- nut CCHCS'1UAL LAIC>SCAÆ AS5.0 PlAN ,. e Plan · · · · · · · · · ~ '.~::~ -¡-@@@~~~@$$$' · · ,~' . dsc Ji or-~- "l------>... EI:('--- ·-o:,-,,::-=:~J:· l:"'--rt: T' .'r I ! ! .. . .... , '" >~, '~ .,$ -1) -," · _~'J" I ,_ , . , " . . ' ;.@< A' coG, $$@$~$$~ ~ .' ---7f;) '\þ. ' ' , ~ t<ti kb.~ '~ (þ; $t:p~ :::~ ,~ ." ~ . ' ." $t" j ~r .,_$~~, ..~. ,t,- \ t- "' =-. ~ !=" i ¡ ~ -..;. -¡>o'í ,-- - S T EVE ~ S C ~ e: f K 90 OJ '- t ~ "R D --. !!!. ~ --:-¡¡¡¡¡¡- ,-=,~-~~-~'~-.: ~-'- -.-:::=:--==- - -::::~~::...:--- iC-~-"··f ;: =:..-.... ::::..... ¡""~ ~.'_..^~ ,.. --- - I ... _.._ __ I ,. -. - II ;~ _7',::;:, ::::-- I :: ="."::.:'_ == -I ,""- ---- .....-- I ... -- -.... : - --- ...- -.., I . -- -- - -- ...... .. -- - ---- '----.-- -,---~--------_._---~---- Paving Legend ~ .!!:.~---_.!!!!!!. -~~ '" -- _.- ....¡-- ...-, .... 1---- ---- .... i__ ___ .- :-- --- .- '-.--- .- .- .---.... - ....'--- .....- .... ;-.- --- .- --.-.- --'- .... -.-- "-- - ~_;;¡¡¡;;:-"*ï¡¡;;';¡;-:¡: c-==) L ,-- " "' ~ f ... ~-- o o . ~ - ......¡ w~ --- 1--- -~..""- .~ .-_r_ .. -- -- .- -.-'" -- -- ~ -.. .. -- -- .. -- -- '. -- -- '. ,. .. o o (j;;) o ....- o L line East pr Landscaping , I , ! ! I i~ ~ .;:;:::;:.~ ~::~~ , i:É~: 7"-: \"/,,,"'/ .-"',' ~ '''''~''''''''''-"'''''~~,~~.;..:. 1œ:~I~' ,,85<1_10 ,,--,~ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERìY COMPANY L --1,..1[9 ] i ~,V/ : '----IC-., -,--~ -0- ....- <EY Io!AP EÐ ! PROGRESS PRINT ! . I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ! ~j 1" .. L ~ SCHEMATiC ELEVATlON@STE....ENSCREEKBOULEVARD ~~:.L~ ~-.ømAL ~¡'._ .~-,:!:!!?,.,. ~...- "'''''...''¡';: ----. ><"_~~'_;:ß ~---.:.-~~- ~~. SCHEMATIC 11m :""" AS4.1b ----.--. , ! , ¡ I . _~..-.,._, i f+--~.'.~~c-:'-.,._H..., ~~-tt~r~-~~!& ~. ,;:-::. '!I;;... :~I:C: ., . _.,_ \. ". ", '/\ I, --\.. '7:{~";~~ ':':":';'~\-,7~::-- v \-,11.'r'.,4 ~ ~'~"'- ,-'/' \',~'~" '< 'ì ' ~~~",\~i:./, ,i;;.~,~,~.. ~\~}'Ä¿:\~~..-<i, .... '1:c ~~~~~"CURB& '-~e$~=" '--~~~~\trM "-----~~r..~~ ~eo..,.Q,T""'!'"_ ~TEa46E"""'""_ STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ----~ ----111:£.&. -....... ~ ~ '-1i?;, ,~~ OR;v£IO,O..... ------- " ~ ~ ~·_><A,.,JfU;.T__ r -.-:- - -,-1/ . ~~,¡¡;~~ I ¡"#it'" ' . " . - '- - . . -, ,', " --- . -I\:~ ij,~; +;~'~'ri\~ L · "'",' __TO! . ..... '..-, ----- ---- - ;¡.,....(¡,......~C>NG&T!!~<="'IiEEJ<:I!i..YDUI"',..~LC1'I2Yc:tC' ,'~' /~~~"'".,. " ~~.t¥.. '>~~-- ".. '~ ',..f---'-~....'-.-... '<~--' i~[-i:."1 "-ll~ i - ¡'T-~--'!' ¡'I :; ¡ ¡ ',:1 ~ I e; ~! ;,I.!""- , ~i "':~; ! '." ~ _\ ciA" ~;;:~,_ " -- "'t. -~-, - ì-¡;- ; f¡ Ii i U l: """IAo<.L""~ l"OI.~ee;l,LB);iiIIT'.. ~~.""""- +."0 ",,·.i ~_. c ....~~~ c.o.:.:-~'\' '"",4"'-",,/c>. roof oJ °i" . .~...." .~.}': _':"::0' "__,4 ,-.....- . " . . , ~!7~~:_ :~.x-'~'?.::j¡.,;:~ - . :Z<~,,:..'" < '. " '. ,'~~~~"'_.,.;;..'-' M::"';':":'~ t I I \ "IOEW..I& ëi..B'Ð<T ----. ~&Tf:YE~ ' ~e.:..v::>,~_ êr: ·:L__ ï-i-- -=--'TT~ r- I'. I! ~..: ·"1 ~" H µ ,'1 . . . ' . , -. m':.·. .'~. , I " )'---"- ---,!,~.'!: -.. ,.----- TYÞlCALTR CMU WALLS wm.¡ PAINTED STUCCO FINISH, TYP. "CUPERTINO ORCHARD THEME" MOSAIC ARTWORK TO BE PROVIDED BY ou.NER SLOPED METAL CANOPY FOR SUN PROTECTION, TYP. NATURAL TIMBER POLE5<SEALEDJ WITH CONCRETE BASES, TYP, , 36" HIe¡,¡.¡ STONE BASE, TYP. ~2'·Ð· KITCHEN WITH TRANSLUCENT WINDOWS CORNICE COMPRISED OF SLATS. TO MATCH SLATS USED ON PROJECT AT ENTRY AND SUNSCREENS-MAINTAIN A THEME OF MATERIALS., TYPICAL OF ALL COI'iNICES SHOUN. LOGO SIGN· NOT A PART OF SUI9MITT AL L'-Ø" ~ , E ~ . I. It T II »"~y<'-' rirt~·T·;~~ n-::t.::l"1"'"'"'J:- 42'·",- LOGO SIGN FACE )/4." OR SEATINC. ---- ¡.., f' &"""'""""" ~,',: }::'~:. ((é , .., , 'h. ':,':1; " " ','t,' . ..'" ~'; r J<'\{~ ),. , ~ " ,:i,;:J:: ", l t ! -,-.......-~ , ,.,""" ~'"'RA<lD! ~ ---- : "" 'i -'; ~.~ ~~ÞØ"~. ./ ,_I ! , , 'I r .~; ~ ""~:¡ ~LE' . \ MEZZANINE I .---;! i ;drAl.. I I IIIr;;:\N;ICGIfoICIIIIm;II"\..Aoffi ;U/\.QIIIR.~,~, I ---~- , ,t<:r!(: r+~ '00 ¡ >:or ~~"._-' ~". - rri"i'm- ". ~._~--:-: . . . . . . . -:- ."7". .. ", . . . . . . . . " . : . .. . ',' , ! : · , : ! : ! V 1 ¡ ¡I: : ; :' i : I ! i i I : : I' ,,' f.." I: I,. ',.. '" . . , , ' / 'I 'j , , ", ,_ ~ n,~, /1 í / <" q __ .~--;-IJf _/_ ._ I I ~ I ~--.J/ ! ¡ " , '0 '/ / '¡' ;:. . i' ¡I,,' ~ t" ,I '~' ,0, '~' ~'~. ' , 0 ~-t~,. :' -~~t&ff" > 'ï*'¡ .', . ,- ''', VI 1'Vf 'I ", I I '", .~ I! I i Ie ,i I I I",' ;~.:.- I ! ( , ,. '[' J<--.i' l. . I ! " '-ðl¡lALE~,""'" = ~'-II'''''''. ~:; '-'~L ¡ : ~ -¡üo!.L~ T"!". ,., ~;~ ' - " .,', , ' " "",,' .. I, I. eL.' ,~. ..,' ~,. ,.I"I"~""""II,·!.II,:,~.g '.. ., '" lL.L'LL,L JL~:,..!,L.~_L:;:~~~,:,:, " ~J . , ,'-..-.-.- '. .~~. I+'-"'~. '.-, '. '1~. 1'.,1' '. I,.~ -1;:l"'b_ "'·"""·"'1' I..' " .,.. '~..."""'..' ! ' I ' ¡ " ' , , ' , ' ! ic\ i: " , ''} ¡ j I. .: ;. ; ! , " .~ '-~E"T"' õ! !~ :.-~"~..-..,_:,,"- 'I . ~I r 11 - .'.J..........'.. _. " ' ¥ ~4:~~~·· ~ ---!#; " I '~; ':'_ .~ 1,1 :~.""' I .~ Q.' 11-",_,;;.._ ,. ,., " , ' '1 ,-1.' !"!61AOœDI.OCIIO j. L ,.".,.,.... YI' "" ,·t .I :¡e.~" , ~;:'Gh' 7'~..r.,y' ~ ,.:'"<. ~ I ¡ ¡ ! ,.,';\ j } '.: ... , ..'. I 'l , I ! :I'" . ~_ :;-"~ ~. 1214 3=11j; .....".'..., ... .~'" l ~, I, . '."" ~r f ~ I . . .I . ~ / , c_.~. _.' ~ -- I >111', """'TN.Q,i$6!..CI"E~PfõIMõ , __ --' I ~ ---- __.J II ';;"i I', . J..,,~. ,. '.' EXI$TmGoAS ,// ) :; : ! !: ': _ ' : ! . . .,¡.- 4~.l" ~ STAT1CN \.1 ' : " !, " ',. ',!.! .;. 1. . .'9'--'-"-'. - ('. II + ?~'-'W-'@'-t$t , '-..f"- mf;#./ ----t in -. . ¡ ! ¡ : ! ! ' i , , ::4: r· ~~ ~'---~.~ - , , ,I "", ,~~ .- \ , ';I·.,'"'<' .... , !:....TI~·PAO) \9; ....-..-. ; '~ilil ,/r;".","~",T¡'¡_ iii , a¡ilolN6 \IIÍ'I' - .,.,..,. ~,~ ........,6Co\PH:òl_' . t . 4eØrþ;JY-./ ~¡ '" r~' I'T, '. ""'I "" ,j' ' I I ' ,\ ./ .é~" 1_ ~ ~~ ." "\ ..', . l.... d ~- '" \ ../,/ \ .~"" IO·'·.~ ",. .'" ,',', --, "/ ," ~~ffi~;"'-""îèl'N_"'A-''--'' ;(~ ,. :~.~. .. ,-" ~, ,,- ¡'~ ~ ~., y ... , -'--"-q ,¡,:---'-'- ""-""-'~ì -<-(''\<_~__¡ ~ ' , < \ G -'-'" I . ,_ . , , ~ . )' \ " ---- ·-ì _I ~..'" /'"."....~:~.:'"_~~~~.:..J :;,\;¡;:~';~:",:}:~:~: &'0_0,' .. ,'," )' ' ~" ..~. . - . ' , , . '," . '" \'/'<," - .. , , I r I I ¡ i t e CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY I taKo~~i_'~ 1:><'$"':><; . \100"""__' I!<J'~PING PoIo-.CAIWXi' O·ððiJ-tU,goe "OJa!Ø!i3.,aaS ~_"""~:J._ ~~....ocrœl!ll)l_ ~~crrr ~c:>._ "---- Exl&T;.;c¡. a;'~D""" ,,-»-.., . '-.--......::»-.- - ~ '" -. .-- ....~_...". --- 'EJp."'''<;:'<'1õ!E ~..,.~¡;: "'L~.o.<õE r-..... r .... . .. ¡ I ;--.--.----..----.. ...-_""""'~......:;. I --=-........ --~ EXJmIG " COOIXI1ONS AS1.0 -- EXlsnNG COND1T1ONS .'¡)'"-""'~ ..i.7~!!· - -";;-'-"::::-- .....~AIICR._ -~. ~-- ---- ~ -.",-:;;;"~,,,,-- "w"'", .""- '" _.. ,.,,,~ ......-. CRAPHIC SCAU: iìiiiiiiiiiiiï ~:": ,) --'- "~_ .-orllJ(ll,-A ----=~="-- . ~ ...~ftI'''''' : - I-:ft.~: .. F- ~!I¡~ !~I ~I!! tor::_ -ge !! ~-- ........-¡. .............,- .._......1_ -=- :. "0:.==- il ~I rl I! .....,.. i f..' "",:::Q .~~ '1,- , . . . -- -- \1, WHOLE FOODS MARKET CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SANDHILL PROPERTY COMPANY Iœ """'''''.'''','~ . -"'""-~.., --""~ "'....1Ii51'gos "~IIðJ,'1.I/i [~ I .¡;- . í: / ., b~s.~..~ KEY III"''' EB ~-~~ _:3,_ ~1IIf6Ie1(rTA..XI"O!I!OI:.O._ 1i",~~i9:,TY __~IØ:...~. ---~_._-_.,- -."" ~ ---- ......,... ........",æ·) ""<a!&.!"_ _._-~ 0""''''- ~ ""iV-' ._.._n.'.o_.. ,_______.____ PI!ElMWIY 11111 ROOF AS2.0 PlAN ~. "'1!iIXI"'G"'~~'~,,"Ci ~<U="'-M_.....""s""""~" '"""'~"".:>è,w;,~~AC'I' _<:GA'",,('I1¡:~""EI'o'"'' ~~ ""~..T,""",<S';S'«,;T6"£<:~;!'Ç ~~, .~..'")'.' )::;"::', !;'~ fo.' 11 ;:J!, ....">.;:., .'1"" -'. )~ i(~ : ~ ~""""j i ~ -- ........... r~- +' "~$ i . ¡. ý" .. .. ! :-. --1'<.. ':-~- ~";~ti'''::' --"M~"'X"¡:~"""Ð<",""" ,';" "~ , : . - ~.~= - Ii [.1;' __ ~~~TCR!"'" 1C.¡e~~"'!", ~_""~':>T"""""' -'~""""~-."'" ---=:2'¡'J.::).~ -IIVO'$C!OP.'i _.....,.."AI<I!"'"'"'....,,""'''''''''''~ -~"s'~::>P'e<"t> -"""'....~~cC<::4~""a<~ -,.~"''IC<7''"''"'''''".-,~ -.."..1I!i:IC>'0I"9<"" --'-~I1""""~öQ;_',""" --.'.-. w.c~..." ~""""""'; ----_._,!,,'!!""""~ .'.~-.~~~~""-E -·14A¡"",",~"iO."'''' -~-"¥ 1'-.,,_____ 2~ --. ..~-- '¡:'~""G.OIII' _"'C!YIl.!...:iI' !!KY;.:c..<!!ATC".o::"'~ !IA.,-""~,,.~px.<: ....-......, ..~"'( ~~'....., I œ I(í ID i.¿ #- I gr. Whole Foods Market Relocation Traffic Flow Analysis Marc McGee January 17, 2006 nvolvement History of ng from Observed Planning Commission meeti December 20, 2005. · I Watched webcast replay and Report. Drafted an email on January 5, 2006 to Counci members, Planning Commission chairman and select staff. the Staff read · · At the request of Sandhill Properties, met with Peter/Mary and Peter Ko on January 7, 2006. · Problem Statement As proposed, Whole Food patrons living east and/or south of the Stevens Creek Boulevard/Stelling intersection will have significant difficulty exiting the Whole Foods site, and may become a traffic concern to local neighborhoods. · The egress onto Stevens Creek Boulevard cannot adequately enable traffic crossing three lanes to enter the left hand turn lane at Stelling. · Traffic will back up at the Stevens Creek exit while motorists wait to cross three lanes of Stevens Creek. · Site Traffic Flow Current At the current location, west-most exit (flowing east) onto Stevens Creek is 290 feet from Saich. · Though somewhat difficult, crossing three lanes of Stevens Creek to u-turn at Saich is achievable. · At the current location, east-most exit (flowing east) onto Stevens Creek is 95 feet from Saich. · to Safely crossing three lanes of Stevens Creek u-turn at Saich is virtually impossible. · Proposed Site Traffic Flow As proposed, current west exit onto Stevens Creek is approximately 355 feet from Stelling. . Traffic will have 65 feet more than at the current site to cross three lanes of Stevens Creek traffic and make a u-turn at Stelling. . . ternatlve A Orient the Whole Foods Market to be parallel with Stevens Creek Move the Stevens Creek entrance/exit to Whole Foods substantially east of its proposed location (232 feet further) . . Benefits East flowing traffic can easily cross three lanes on Stevens Creek to u-turn at Stevens Creek/Stelling . - Potential for use of South flowing traffic can easily cross three lanes on Stevens Creek to left onto Stelling at Stevens Creek/Stelling Alves is greatly reduced . rements . I Requ Applicant Markets greatly prefer to have the majority of the parking directly facing the entrance to the market. · Orienting Whole Foods parallel with Stevens Creek places most of the parking offset (and away) from the market's entrance. · The back of all Whole Foods Markets is designated as a storeroom - no exterior doors or windows. · My Recommendations Accept the proposed Whole Foods site plan with one modification: . th ree to be ng Whole - Change the west exit onto Stevens Creek lanes wide (adding a third lane) traffic enteri - East-most lane will be used by Foods from Stevens Creek - Middle exit lane will be used by traffic exiting Whole Foods to cross three lanes of Stevens Creek and u- turn at Stelling - West-most exit lane will be used by traffic exiting Whole Foods and proceeding west of Stevens Creek or turning right onto Stelling