The URL can be used to link to this page

04. Vallco Condos ITYOF CUPERJINO Agenda Item No. q City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Summary Agenda Date: Januarv 30. 2006 Application: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Applicant: Mike Rohde (Valko Shopping Center) Property Location: 10123 N. Wolfe Road APNs: 316-20-057 & 316-20-064 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the applications, as summarized in the next section (Application Summary), on a 4-0 vote. APPLICATION SUMMARY: 1. USE PERMIT to construct a 137-unit, two and three-story condominium development 2. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL to construct a 137-unit, two and three-story condominium development 3. RE-ZONING (Z-2005-05) of a 5.19 acre parcel from Planned Development (Regional Shopping) to Planned Development (Regional Shopping/Residential) 4. MODIFICATION TO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (1-DA-90) to encompass the development proposed in U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, and TR-2005-04 5. TREE REMOVAL for an attached condominium development 6. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Data: General Plan Designation: Current Zoning Designation: Proposed Zoning Designation: Specific Plan: Acreage (GrossfNet): Residential Units: Residential Density: Building Height: Floor Area Ratio: Commercial/ Residential P (Regional Shopping) P (Regional Shopping/Residential) Heart of the City of Cupertino 5.19 gross acres/4.37 net acres 137 units (reduced from 156 units originally) 26.4 units/ gross acre Max 45 feet (3 stories), Min 30 feet (2 stories) .69 cj-I Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Valko Residential Condominiums Page 2 Project Consistency with: General Plan: Zoning: Specific Plan: Yes No. Rezoning to allow residential uses. Yes, substantially, except for the east side yard setback. Environmental Assessment: Mitigated Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: On January 10, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted (4-0) to recommend approval of the proposed residential condominium development with changes that are incorporated into the suggested conditions of approval. At the meeting, the Commission acknowledged that the applicant had made significant changes to the project to attempt to address concerns raised by the neighbors and the community, and also complemented the architectural design of the project. On January 23, 2006, Valko resubmitted a revised site plan (See Exhibit D) for the City Council's review that incorporates some of the recommended changes by the Planning Commission. The complete list of modifications as recommended by the Planning Commission is outlined in the Discussion section below. The revised site plan has included recommended changes related to a further reduction in number of units, an increase in the side yard setback along the western property line, and an increase of the open space at the southeast corner of the site. However, the applicant did not include changes related to a reduction in the number of three- bedroom units. A further review of this revised site plan is included in the Discussion section below. DISCUSSION: Proiect Description: The project as presented at the January 10th Planning Commission proposed a 139 unit, two- and three-story condominium complex located within five buildings over an underground podium parking garage, a 1,600 square foot recreation facility surrounded by a 35,500 square foot recreation area, and a 4,000 square foot day care center adjacent to an 8,000 square foot playground area. The project proposed a mix of 34 one-bedroom units, 84 two-bedroom units and 21 three-bedroom units. Further, a permeable landscaped emergency vehicle access was shown along the western perimeter of the site Please refer to the enclosed Planning Commission report for a more detailed description of the project as presented at the meeting. The remainder of this report focuses' on the issues raised at the Planning Commission's public hearing, and a review of the revised site plan submitted on January 23rd. 4 - c, Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-0l, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Valko Residential Condominiums Page 3 Planning Commission: The Commission recommended changes as follows: 1. Reduce the number of units from 139 units to 137 units by eliminating two of the 3-bedroom units to lessen the impact of student generation. Applicant prefers to reduce two two-bedroom units instead of three-bedroom units. 2. Require a minimum 18-foot east side yard setback along Interstate 280. Applicant requested an 18 foot side yard setback; the Heart of the City requires a minimum 20 foot setback. The revised plans now accommodate a 21 foot setback in accordance with the Heart of the City. 3. Provide a minimum 40-foot side yard setback along the western property line, 4. Expand the corner open space by: a. Modifying the Perimeter Road entrance from Wolfe Road. b. Modifying the driveway entrance for the condominium complex by creating a shared driveway for the condominium complex and day care. c. Removing the surface "parking lot" for the day care and replacing with 7 perpendicular parking spaces that can back out directly into the driveway. d. Reducing the day care center to 3,600 square feet. 5. Provide privacy protection planting by: a. Planting a second row of field-grown size redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen tree, within the existing landscape planter area along the western perimeter of the property. b. Planting a double row of trees within the landscape area adjacent to the southern side of Building A, facing the future parking structure site. c. Planting a second row of trees between Buildings A and B. d. Planting infill trees where gaps currently exist in the landscape planter along the western sound wall for privacy protection, in accordance with ERC's recommendation. e. Preserving the existing coast live oak tree as identified by the arborist report, if possible and it is not within the development area of the site. f. Plant up to thirty (30) 24-inch box evergreen trees within the Cal Trans Right-of-Way landscape area adjacent to the project site. 6. Plant two new replacement trees for each tree that was removed on site prior to approval of a Tree Removal Permit, in accordance with .ERe's recommendation. '+-3 Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Vallco Residential Condominiums Page 4 7. Require that an independent economic/marketing consultant be hired to evaluate the economic impacts of the project. The Commission expressed a desire to understand Vallco's need for approval of this residential project to aid in the funding of commercial projects and the parking structure for the future success of the shopping mall. Applicant: The applicant and project architect expressed the following comments during the meeting: ~ Vallco needs to be a lifestyle entertainment shopping center to compete with malls such as Valley Fair and Stanford. ~ Condominium project will help finance the majority of interior and exterior improvements to the mall. ~ Significant changes were made to the plans including reduction of units to 139 units, reduction of building heights to two-stories along the western side of the property, elimination of balconies on elevations facing the western side of the property, creation of open space on the southeast corner of the site, and additional setbacks between 36 feet and 42 feet on the west side of the property, inclusive of landscaping and the emergency vehicle access lane. ~ Request is made to allow an 18 foot side yard setback along the east side of the property adjacent to Interstate 280 to accommodate the underground podium parking garage. ~ Goal of the landscaping between the future parking structure and the condominium project is to create a tree-lined road along Perimeter Road. Public: The Planning Commission heard from several speakers during the public hearing who provided the following comments: ~ Residents do not want an opening created in the sound wall along the western property line that would provide vehicular, pedestrian and/ or bicycle access into their neighborhood to the west. ~ Residents are concerned that the future condominium owners will ask for an opening in the sound wall for access into the neighborhood and school to the west. ~ Development site is too small for the number of units proposed; density of project should be reduced. ~ Project should be reduced to half of the number of units and provide additional green space along the western sound wall. ~ Project will bring more students into school districts that are already impacted. ~ Developers should pay for new high school because schools are overcrowded. +-'1 Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Vallco Residential Condominiums Page 5 ~ Overflow parking for the shopping mall will be gone if condominiums are built on the site. ~ Additional studies should be conducted to consider the total cumulative impacts of all new development projects in the area pertaining to traffic, school, and environmental impacts. ~ Planning Commission should hold off on a recommendation until further studies are conducted. ~ The proposed western side yard setback is not sufficient to mitigate privacy impacts onto the adjacent residential neighborhood to the west, particularly since most of the adjacent residences are one-story. ~ The Planning Commission should deny the project. ~ The two-story buildings on top of the podium parking garage will appear more like 21/2 story buildings. ~ Project as a residential complex will appear as an isolated island at the shopping mall. ~ Buildings are lengthy with no breaks. ~ Project will change the value of properties in the area. ~ High density housing is not appropriate on this site. ~ This type of mixed-use project is not welcome by the neighborhood. ~ Cupertino Chamber of Commerce is supportive of the project. ~ Vallco should be required to replant trees that were removed. ~ Development at Vallco Fashion Park is taking place in a piecemeal fashion. January 23. 2006 Revised Site Plan: Unit Count The revised site plan reduces the unit count to 137 units. The applicant states that the three-bedroom units are premium units offering a higher pro-forma needed to help finance the Vallco shopping mall redevelopment; therefore, they feel it is important to retain these units. Perimeter Road Realignment and Open Space The applicant has slightly realigned the Perimeter Road entrance from Wolfe Road to create a less severe turning radius. The Commission requested realigrunent of the Perimeter Road entrance to allow expansion of the open space area around the day care center and retainment of the existing mature trees along the Perimeter Road entrance. Staff has noted that the purpose of the realignment, as recommended by the Commission, has not been incorporated into the design of the project. The partial tree removal plan (see Exhibit C) indicates that four of the five existing trees along Peiimeter Road are proposed to be removed. 4--~ Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Vallco Residential Condominiums Page 6 Staff recommends the following: 1. Perimeter Road entrance should be further straightened and realigned to the west for greater expansion of open space area at this corner. 2. A 4-way stop should be installed where Perimeter Road meets with the driveway entrance to the project site. 3. All of the existing trees along the Perimeter Road entrance be retained. 4. The shared driveway entrance to the condominium development and day care center should be slightly realigned to the west to create a less severe turning radius from intersection of the proposed 4-way stop. 5. The seven surface parking spaces should be shifted slightly to the north. Landscaping A revised landscape plan has not yet been submitted to the City for review; therefore, it is not known if the Planning Commission's recommendations related to landscaping are proposed to be incorporated into the project by the applicant. The total proposed landscape/ open space area, including the playground area, common open space behind the day care building, landscaped courtyards, recreation area and landscape buffers within the setbacks, is approximately 124,500 square feet. Useable open space area, that excludes the landscape buffers within the setbacks and the emergency vehicle access, is calculated to be approximately 69,000 square feet, or 55.4% of the total landscape/ open space area on the site. Staff recommends that the Commission's recommendations pertaining to landscaping be required of the project. FIoor Area Ratio The revised site plan indicates a total condominium building area of 154,750 square feet, which translates into a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .69. However, if the proposed 4,000 square foot day care and 1,600 square foot recreation building are added, the FAR is .71. If the FAR is calculated considering only the net developable area of 4.37 acres, the condominium building FAR is .75 and including the day care and recreation building, the FAR is .78. ENCLOSURES Draft Ordinance for Z-2005-05 Draft Ordinance for DA-2005-01 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6355 for U-2005-16 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6356 for ASA-2004-11 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6358 for Z-2005-05 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6361 for DA-2005-01 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6360 for TR-2005-04 Plan Set Lf-(P Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Vallco Residential Condominiums Page 7 Exhibit A: Email from Yi-Ke Wang dated January 18, 2006 Exhibit B: Planning Commission Staff Report and enclosures dated January 10, 2006 (including the draft mitigated negative declaration and consultants' reports) Exhibit C: Partial Tree Removal Plan at southeast corner of site Exhibit D: Revised Site Plan stamped received January 23, 2006 Exhibit E: Updated Vallco Fashion Park Master Plan Prepared by: Aki Honda, Senior Planner J ,/-' \ ~ Ste Piasecki Director, Community Development Approved by: ~ David W. Knapp City Manager G:\Planning\PDREPORT\ CC\ U-2005-16CC.doc 4- '7 MODEL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RE-ZONING OF A 5.19 ACRE PARCEL FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING/RESIDENTIAL) AT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application no. Z-2005-05) for the rezoning of a property to Planned Development (Regional Shopping/Residential); and WHEREAS, the re-zoning is consistent with the City's General Plan land use map, proposed uses and surrounding uses; and WHEREAS, upon due notice and after one public hearing the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the rezoning be granted; and WHEREAS, a map of the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A as a proposed amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Cupertino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the property described in attached Exhibit A is hereby rezoned to Planned Development (Regional Shopping/Residential); and that Exhibit A attached hereto is made part of the Zoning Map of the City of Cupertino. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 30th day of January, 2006 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the _ day of February, 2006, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino G: \ Planning \ POREPORT\ ORO \ 2-2005-05 Ord.doc 4-'; EXHIBIT A RE-ZONE 5.19 ACRES FROM: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING) TO: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING/RESIDENTIAL) DAAIŒORNE ~ ~ 8 ~ i ¡ , , .' : ~ ~r^'/'i/ 'i) _...-·..4!i1.5:r...._____~'-.7 "r"- "".",~, <. <'.~. ,-, /"" ^.-.>-..,..,.. ,.".--"'""~. .---....------.-.....-.....--.--.... -- """ , .¿,.; "'~'~' I /1-;// '"""_C'_OC~';," ,'//':' ,/,/' . ~\ ..-L--;::-" " ~~ - -~~]! ~// 't:--~ ,/ , -" ~" L" ~~'_; >j__~""'" ~#..ptJ> --1, ¡ t: """~V,·/· ¡d~ ~,;:.., , .; ~ c' f ",If _~ . ,./* NOfIWKH .l:ÆNtÆ $ J' :ð' *' =:..., V¡úlfEROAO ~rn» ",EB ...,...~~--~"....,_._-~~.- ~_._.MM·~_....~__~~...__·~.._~ Øiu¡;¡,",;I¡<;¡UI;:.s.¡,--~-·-·~-·_^ CONDOMINIUMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CAUFORNIA I~~ær¡,);~ >,~....:::.=-~... Zoning ~Iat Map ~. R~ -,.;; ,. -- -r\. P.rko~!l"fj,~~tþ,. ~,..~_...,......",.....'''''_ ""-"'''''''~'.'' _..,,""~,,~~ "-'''''<'' ",' "'''~'''_'~'''__'' .""",_....,,,-,.,...,, '_."m__.~."""''''.O .":,~~~.,,",,,,,, 4-9 MODEL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MODIFYING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (1-DA-90) TO ENCOMPASS THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05 AND TR-2005-04 FOR A 137 UNIT, TWO- AND THREE- STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD. WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application No. DA-2005- 01) for the modification of a development agreement (1-DA-90) to encompass the development proposed in U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, and TR-2005-04 for a 137 unit, two- and three-story residential condominium development; and WHEREAS, the modification is consistent with the City's General Plan land use map, proposed uses and surroundings; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the subject Development Agreement meets the following requirements: 1. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 2. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the real property is or will be located; 3. Is in conformity with and will promote public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice; 4. Is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare; 5. Will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or preservation of property values; and 6. Will promote and encourage the development of the proposed project by providing a greater degree of requisite certainty. WHEREAS, upon due notice and after one public hearing the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the amendment be granted; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 2.2 Vested Elements, of the development agreement described as 1-DA-90, is hereby amended to add a sub-section adding the development proposed in U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, and TR-2005-04¡ as vested elements of the development agreement. Said subsection shall read as follows: <+-/0 Ordinance No. Page 2 DA-2005-01 January 10, 2006 Applications U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, and TR-2005-04 for a 137 unit, two- and three- story residential condominium development as shown on the approved exhibits for said applications. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the _ day of .2006 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the _ day of _ 2006, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor of Cupertino G:planning/ pdreport/ res / D A-2005-01 2 4-/1 U-2005-16 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6355 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 137 UNIT, TWO- AND THREE- STORY CONDOMIMIUM DEVELOPMENTAT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title; 3) The proposal conforms with the design guidelines and development standards of the Heart of the City Specific Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2005-16 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. éf-l2.- Resolution No.6355 Page 2 U-2005-16 January 10,2006 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2005-16 Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on plan set entitled "Condominiums at Vallco" dated January 3, 2006, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 137-unit residential condominium complex consisting of two- and three-story buildings over a podium parking garage, and day care center. 3. PROTECT AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project, considered major by the Director of Community Development. 4. SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS The project will require approval of the final design by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall incorporate the following modifications: a. Modify plans to provide a minimum 18 foot side yard setback along the east property line adjacent to the Interstate 280 Wolfe Road off-ramp. b. Reduce the maximum number of units to 137 residential units by removing two of the three-bedroom units from the project. c. Reduce the west side of Building A to a 2-story building height matching the building heights of Buildings D and E. d. Modify the roadway entrance (Perimeter Road) so that there is a less severe turning radius into the project site and more trees along Perimeter Road can be retained. e. Provide an expanded open space area at the southeast corner of the project site incorporating passive recreational green space with benches. f. Reduce the size of the day care center to a maximum of 3,600 square feet. g. Remove the surface "parking lot" for the day care center and provide 7 surface parking spaces that can back out directly (e.g., perpendicular parking) into,the driveway; modify the driveway entrance for the condominium complex to accommodate this revised surface parking scheme. 4-/3 Resolution No.6355 Page 3 U-2005-l6 January 10, 2006 h. Provide a minimum 40-foot setback along the western property line, incorporating the existing landscape area along the western perimeter of the site and the minimum 20-foot wide emergency vehicle access. , Provide a double row of trees within the landscape area adjacent to the southern side of Building A facing the future parking structure site for additional screening. J. Provide a second row of trees between Building A and B for additional screening. k. Preserve the existing coast live oak as identified by the arborist report of August 9,2005 by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, if possible, and if it is not within the development area of the site. 5. LANDSCAPING The applicant shall: a. Submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. b. Maintain the existing landscape planter area, including existing trees, along the western property line. c. Provide for infill trees along the western property line where gaps currently exist, as determined by the Director of Community Development. The infill trees shall be redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Director of Community Development, and shall be field grown size. d. Plant a second row of redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Director of Community Development, within the landscape planter area to be retained along the western property line. Trees shall be field grown size. e. Provide up to thirty 24-inch box evergreen trees within the Cal Trans Right-of- Way landscape area adjacent to the project site and the Interstate 280 off-ramp. The applicant shall work with Cal Trans to secure approval for planting of these trees along the project site on Cal Trans property. £. Provide a double row of trees within the landscape area adjacent to the southern side of Building A facing the future parking structure site for additional screening. The type and size of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. g. Provide a second row of trees between Building A and Building B for additional screening. The type and size of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. h. Preserve the existing coast live oak as identified by the arborist report of August 9,2005 by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, if possible, and if it is not within the development area of the site. '1-/1 Resolution No.6355 Page 4 U-2005-16 January 10, 2006 6. TREE REPLACEMENT For each tree that was removed prior to approval of a Tree Removal Permit, two new trees shall be planted on site. 7. TREE PROTECTION MEASURES The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures in the arborist report dated August 9,2005, and prepared by the City's Consulting Arborist, Barrie D. Coate and Associates. 8. TREE PROTECTION BOND A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits. 9. ECONOMIC/MARKETING CONSULTANT The Applicant shall pay for a study to be conducted by an independent economic/ marketing consultant of the City's choosing that shall evaluate the economic impacts the overall project will have on the success of the Vallco shopping mall. 10. WALL EXTENSION The applicant shall provide an extension to the existing soundwall along the western perimeter of the project site to provide for additional privacy screening and sound mitigation from the project site. The design, materials and color shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. No extensions shall be constructed until a building permit is obtained. 11. NOISE DISCLOSURE Any and all future property owners of the residential units shall receive disclosure of the potential for noise impacts from the parking garage to be constructed adjacent to the Macy's department store. 12. OPEN SPACE The project shall comply with the Heart of the City Specific Plan for private and common open space requirements for the project. 13. PARKING AVAILABILITY DURING CONSTRUCTION In accordance with the Development Agreement, the short term deficit of parking availability may not exceed 200 spaces at any time at Vallco Fashion Park. At any time the deficit exceeds 200 spaces, the applicant shall provide sufficient additional parking to offset the deficit to a level at or below the 200 space threshold level. Prior to issuance of building permits, compliance with the number of required parking spaces during construction shall be demonstrated. LI-rs Resolution No.6355 Page 5 U-2005-l6 January 10, 2006 14. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building materials shall be recycled. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 15. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING PROGRAM The applicant shall participate in the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing program by providing 15% of the units at below market rates to qualified buyers. The applicant shall record a covenant, which shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney, to be recorded simultaneously with the filing of a building permit. 16. DESIGN The applicant shall make the following design changes as recommended by the City's Architectural Advisor, Larry Cannon, to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits: · Refine wall caps to ensure positive wall termination. · Open up the stoops, making them more individual in character (e.g., consider some stoops with open railings). · Modify the design of the fins to open them up at the top or lighten their visual mass through use of perforated metal to relate to the trellises (e.g., metal like trellises). · Provide visual unity to the base of buildings (e.g., provide uniform base materials) 17. PARKING GARAGE The width of the parking garage entry shall be no larger than 20 feet in keeping with the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Garage ramps shall comply with building code and fire code requirements. 18. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management and parking plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 250 of any residential property. 19. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval if any portion of the underground podium parking is to be utilized as shared parking for the day care center. 4--! ~ Resolution NO.6355 Page 6 U-2005-l6 January 10, 2006 20. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/ colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 21. NOISE The applicant shall comply with the noise mitigation measures in the noise impact report dated November 15, 2005, and prepared by James Reyff of Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. 22. AIR OUALITY The applicant shall comply with the air quality control measures in the air quality impact report dated November 21, 2005, and prepared by James Reyff of Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. 23. SANITARY DISTRICT The applicant shall provide all necessary sanitary sewer improvements for the proposed project as required by the Cupertino Sanitary District. Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written confirmation that adequate capacity is available for the project or the applicant shall pay for the appropriate mitigation costs to provide the required capacity and shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the District. 24. WATER SERVICE Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written confirmation from California Water Service that adequate capacity is available for the project or the applicant shall pay for the appropriate mitigation costs to provide the required capacity and shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the Service. 25. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservatio~, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you 4-11 Resolution No.6355 Page 7 U-2005-16 January 10, 2006 fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 26. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 27. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 28. TRAFFIC MEASURES a. The applicant may be required to make a contribution toward the improvement of an additional right turn movement from west bound Vallco Parkway to north bound Wolfe Road, if required by the Public Works Department. b. The applicant shall be required to undertake or make a contribution to improve the intersection of north bound Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road if mitigation measures are recommended to improve this intersection as a result of an amended traffic study and as determined by the Public Works Department. c. The applicant shall provide bicycle parking/ access and pedestrian connections to adjacent neighborhoods as required by the Public Works Department. d. A pedestrian connection to Wolfe Road shall be provided to provide access to the sidewalks and bus stops on Wolfe Road. e. Stop signs shall be provided at the driveway intersection with Perimeter Road. f. The applicant shall be required to provide make improvements to correct operational deficiencies at the traffic signal at the intersection of Wolfe Road and the Interstate 280 south bound off-ramp. These improvements include providing pedestrian countdown signal heads and installing or upgrading emergency vehicle preempt (EVP) equipment. 29. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Reconstruction of sidewalks shall be required along N. Wolfe Road, where sidewalks provide pedestrian connections to the project site, if they have been damaged and uplifted by trees, as determined and required by the Public Works Department. Improvements and repair of sidewalks and/ or pedestrian connections on Vallco Fashion Park along Perimeter Road from Stevens Creek Boulevard to the western perimeter of the project site shall be required, as determined and required by the Public Works Department. 4-/'? Resolution No.6355 Page 8 U-2005-l6 January 10,2006 30. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 31. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City, Santa Clara County Fire and San Jose Water Company. 32. TRAFFIC SIGNS, DETAILS, AND LEGENDS Traffic control signs, details and legends shall be placed at locations specified by the City. All improvement plans shall include all necessary signage, details and legends. 33. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.0S of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 34. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. *Pre and Post Development Calculations are required 35. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City and Santa Clara County Fire, as needed. 36. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. ÿ-- t9 Resolution No.6355 Page 9 U-2005-l6 January 10, 2006 37. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: h. Street Tree $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $2,130.00 min. $ 5% of Site Improvement Cost $ 3,000.00 TBD ** $ 6,750.00 $ 1,077,300.00 By Developer .. Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the Public Utility Commission (P.U.c.) Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b, Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 38. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. In the even an above ground enclosure/ device must be located in an area visible from the public street, then it shall be specifically designed to hide or screen the device such that it is compatible with the surrounding commercial shopping environment. In no case shall such structures conflict with pedestrian movement or be located on prominent corners. Said screening and design may include fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. Said equipment locations shall be determined prior to issuance of building permits. 4·;)0 Resolution No.6355 Page 10 U-2005-l6 January 10, 2006 39. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development, as needed. 40. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. 41. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS In addition, the applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and stormwater treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. The City encourages the use of HMP (Hydromodification plan) BMP's in the design of the project. The property owners with treatment BMP's will be required to certify on-going operation and maintenance. 42. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a notice of intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses a preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction BMP's to control storm water runoff quality and BMP inspection and maintenance 43. TRAFFIC The applicant must address all concerns and comments from the Traffic Department. Clearance by the Traffic Department is needed to obtain a building permit. A traffic control plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the Traffic Department prior to commencement of work. 4--21 Resolution No.6355 Page 11 U-2005-16 January 10,2006 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Giefer COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: I s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Gilbert Wong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Planning Commission c:\ Planning \ POREPORT\ RES \2005 \ U-2005-16.doc 4-- 1--.:L- ASA-2005-ll CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6356 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR A TWO- AND THREE-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2005-11 (EA-2005-10) Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. The proposal will use materials and design elements that compliment neighboring structures; 4. The proposal conforms with the design guidelines and standards of the Heart of the City Specific Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval, File No. ASA- 2005-11 is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and 4- -,:1-5 Resolution No.6356 Page 2 ASA-2005-11 January 10,2006 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2005- 11 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on plan set entitled "Condominiums at Vallco" dated January 3, 2006, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 137-unit residential condominium complex consisting of two- and three-story buildings over a podium parking garage, and day care center. 3. PROTECT AMENDMENTS The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project, considered major by the Director of Community Development. 4. SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS The project will require approval of the final design by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall incorporate the following modifications: a. Modify plans to provide a minimum 18 foot side yard setback along the east property line adjacent to the Interstate 280 Wolfe Road off-ramp. b. Reduce the maximum number of units to 137 residential units by removing two of the three-bedroom units from the project. c. Reduce the west side of Building A to a 2-story building height matching the building heights of Buildings D and E. d. Modify the roadway entrance (Perimeter Road) so that there is a less severe turning radius into the project site and more trees along Perimeter Road can be retained. e. Provide an expanded open space area at the southeast corner of the project site incorporating passive recreational green space with benches. f. Reduce the size of the day care center to a maximum of 3,600 square feet. g. Remove the surface "parking lot" for the day care center and provide 7 surface parking spaces that can back out directly (e.g., perpendicular parking) into the driveway; modify the driveway entrance for the condominium complex to accommodate this revised surface parking scheme. h. Provide a minimum 40-foot setback along the western property line, incorporating the existing landscape area along the western perimeter of the site and the minimum 20- foot wide emergency vehicle access. 1. Provide a double row of trees within the landscape area adjacent to the southern side of Building A facing the future parking structure site for additional screening. J. Provide a second row of trees between Building A and B for additional screening. Lf - y!/ Resolution No.6356 Page 3 ASA-2005-ll January 10,2006 k. Preserve the existing coast live oak as identified by the arborist report of August 9, 2005 by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, if possible, and if it is not within the development area of the site. 5. LANDSCAPING The applicant shall: a. Submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. b. Maintain the existing landscape planter area, including existing trees, along the western property line. c. Provide for infill trees along the western property line where gaps currently exist, as determined by the Director of Community Development. The infill trees shall be redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Director of Community Development, and shall be field grown size. d. Plant a second row of redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Director of Community Development, within the landscape planter area to be retained along the western property line. Trees shall be field grown size. e. Provide up to thirty 24-inch box evergreen trees within the Cal Trans Right-of-Way landscape area adjacent to the project site and the Interstate 280 off-ramp. The applicant shall work with Cal Trans to secure approval for planting of these trees along the project site on Cal Trans property. f. Provide a double row of trees within the landscape area adjacent to the southern side of Building A facing the future parking structure site for additional screening. The type and size of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. g. Provide a second row of trees between Building A and Building B for additional screening. The type and size of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. h. Preserve the existing coast live oak as identified by the arborist report of August 9, 2005 by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, if possible, and if it is not within the development area of the site. 6. TREE REPLACEMENT For each tree that was removed prior to approval of a Tree Removal Permit, two new trees shall be planted on site. 7. TREE PROTECTION MEASURES The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures in the arborist report dated August 9, 2005, and prepared by the City's Consulting Arborist, Barrie D. Coate and Associates. 8. TREE PROTECTION BOND A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits. 4 -;)-t;- Resolution No.6356 Page 4 ASA-2005-ll January 10, 2006 9. ECONOMIC/MARKETING CONSULTANT The Applicant shall pay for a study to be conducted by an independent economic/marketing consultant of the City's choosing that shall evaluate the economic impacts the overall project will have on the success of the Vallco shopping mall. 10. WALL EXTENSION The applicant shall provide an extension to the existing soundwaIl along the western perimeter of the project site to provide for additional privacy screening and sound mitigation from the project site. The design, materials and color shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. No extensions shall be constructed until a building permit is obtained. 11. NOISE DISCLOSURE Any and all future property owners of the residential units shall receive disclosure of the potential for noise impacts from the parking garage to be constructed adjacent to the Macy's department store. 12. OPEN SPACE The project shall comply with the Heart of the City Specific Plan for private and common open space requirements for the project. 13. PARKING AVAILABILITY DURING CONSTRUCTION In accordance with the Development Agreement, the short term deficit of parking availability may not exceed 200 spaces at any time at Vallco Fashion Park. At anytime the deficit exceeds 200 spaces, the applicant shall provide sufficient additional parking to offset the deficit to a level at or below the 200 space threshold level. Prior to issuance of building permits, compliance with the number of required parking spaces during construction shall be demonstrated. 14. DEMOLITION REOUlREMENTS All demolished building materials shall be recycled. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 15. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING PROGRAM The applicant shall participate in the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing program by providing 15% of the units at below market rates to qualified buyers. The applicant shall record a covenant, which shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney, to be recorded simultaneously with the filing of a building permit. 4--~0 Resolution No.6356 Page 5 ASA-2005-ll January 10, 2006 16. DESIGN The applicant shall make the following design changes as recommended by the City's Architectural Advisor, Larry Cannon, to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits: · Refine wall caps to ensure positive wall termination. · Open up the stoops, making them more individual in character (e.g., consider some stoops with open railings). · Modify the design of the fins to open them up at the top or lighten their visual mass through use of perforated metal to relate to the trellises (e.g., metal like trellises). · Provide visual unity to the base of buildings (e.g., provide uniform base materials) 17. PARKING GARAGE The width of the parking garage entry shall be no larger than 20 feet in keeping with the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Garage ramps shall comply with building code and fire code requirements. 18. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A construction management and parking plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 250 of any residential property. 19. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review and approval if arty portion of the underground podium parking is to be utilized as shared parking for the day care center. 20. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/ colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 21. NOISE The applicant shall comply with the noise mitigation measures in the noise impact report dated November 15, 2005, and prepared by James Reyff of Illingworth & Rodkinl Inc. 22. AIR OUALlTY The applicant shall comply with the air quality control measures in the air quality impact report dated November 21, 2005, and prepared by James Reyff of Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. 4-ß-' Resolution No.6356 Page 6 ASA-2005-ll January 10, 2006 23. SANITARY DISTRICT The applicant shall provide all necessary sanitary sewer improvements for the proposed project as required by the Cupertino Sanitary District. Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written confirmation that adequate capacity is available for the project or the applicant shall pay for the appropriate mitigation costs to provide the required capacity and shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the District. 24. WATER SERVICE Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written confirmation from California Water Service that adequate capacity is available for the project or the applicant shall pay for the appropriate mitigation costs to provide the required capacity and shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the Service. 25. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICA nONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 26. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 27. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 28. TRAFFIC MEASURES a. The applicant may be required to make a contribution toward the improvement of an additional right turn movement from west bound Vallco Parkway to north bound Wolfe Road, if required by the Public Works Department. b. The applicant shall be required to undertake or make a contribution to improve the intersection of north bound Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road if mitigation measures are recommended to improve this intersection as a result of an amended traffic study and as determined by the Public Works Department. c. The applicant shall provide bicycle parking/ access and pedestrian connections to adjacent neighborhoods as required by the Public Works Department. 4-zJ5 Resolution No.6356 Page 7 ASA-2005-1l January 10, 2006 d. A pedestrian connection to Wolfe Road shall be provided to provide access to the , sidewalks and bus stops on Wolfe Road. e. Stop signs shall be provided at the driveway intersection with Perimeter Road. f. The applicant shall be required to provide make improvements to correct operational deficiencies at the traffic signal at the intersection of Wolfe Road and the Interstate 2S0 south bound off-ramp. These improvements include providing pedestrian countdown signal heads and installing or upgrading emergency vehicle preempt (EVP) equipment. 29. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Reconstruction of sidewalks shall be required along N. Wolfe Road, where sidewalks provide pedestrian connections to the project site, if they have been damaged and uplifted by trees, as determined and required by the Public Works Department. Improvements and repair of sidewalks and/ or pedestrian connections on Vallco Fashion Park along Perimeter Road from Stevens Creek Boulevard to the western perimeter of the project site shall be required, as determined and required by the Public Works Department. 30. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 31. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City, Santa Clara County Fire and San Jose Water Company. 32. TRAFFIC SIGNS, DETAILS, AND LEGENDS Traffic control signs, details and legends shall be placed at locations specified by the City. All improvement plans shall include all necessary signage, details and legends. 33. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.0S of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 34. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facifities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. *Pre and Post Development Calculations are required L/-;J-9 Resolution No.6356 Page 8 ASA-2005-11 January 10, 2006 35. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City and Santa Clara County Fire, as needed. 36. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 37. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: h. Street Tree $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $2,130.00 min. $ 5% of Site Improvement Cost $ 3,000.00 TBD ** $ 6,750.00 $1,077,300.00 By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the Public Utility Commission (P.U.c.) Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 38. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. In the even an above ground enclosure/ device must be located in an area visible from the public street, then it shall be specifically designed to hide or screen the device such that it is compatible with the surrounding commercial shopping environment. In no case shall such structures conflict 4--- 30 Resolution No.6356 Page 9 ASA-2005-ll January 10, 2006 with pedestrian movement or be located on prominent corners. Said screening and design may include fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. Said equipment locations shall be determined prior to issuance of building permits. 39. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development, as needed. 40. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. 41. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REOUIREMENTS In addition, the applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and stormwater treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. The City encourages the use of HMP (Hydromodification plan) BMP's in the design of the project. The property owners with treatment BMP's will be required to certify on-going operation and maintenance. 42. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a notice of intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses a preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction BMP's to control storm water runoff quality and BMP inspection and maintenance 43. TRAFFIC The applicant must address all concerns and comments from the Traffic Department. Clearance by the Traffic Department is needed to obtain a building permit. A traffic control plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the Traffic Department prior to commencement of work. +-31 Resolution No.6356 Page 10 ASA-2005-11 January 10, 2006 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Giefer COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/GilbertWong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Planning Commission G:Cupertino/planning/PO ReportjRE51 A5A -2 005-11 4--- $2- Z-2005-05 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6358 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE RE-ZONING OF A 5.19 ACRE PARCEL FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING/RESIDENTIAL) AT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: Z-2005-05 (EA-2005-10) Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR REZONING WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the rezoning of property, as described on this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the subject rezonIng meets the following requirements: 1) That the rezoning is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino. 2) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to conform to the new zoning designation. 3) That the new zoning encourages the most appropriate use of land. 4) That the proposed rezoning is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of subject parcels. 5) That the rezoning promotes the orderly development of the city. Y- - 33 Resolution No. 6358 Page 2 Z-2005-05 January 10, 2006 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. Z-2005-05 is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application Z-2005-05, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006 and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1 APPROVED EXHIBITS Zoning approval is for area shown in Zoning Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABST AIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Giefer COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Gilbert Wong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission 4-31 EXHIBIT A RE-ZONE 5.19 ACRES FROM: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING) TO: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (REGIONAL SHOPPING/RESIDENTIAL) ~ I! to ¡¡ ~ ' ¡"-ii' ,."."-----,.-~;:;f",'~'r-~-.----~8.E.-....------'--- t. --==:ìl ---"~ '-~lll WI ." ~ '-I ~'" ~_J I -,ï:- : t·-d --2c"" " 1-.. ~J' ;, " ~'~ J, '", " Ii" Il NORI'IICHA"ENLÆ . 1þ./" ',,:1 ~ ~rn" ~ J.o.œ "'.,..........-._~......._.~_._ø...._.,,__ ~_._._,,_,_~_.__....._ _...u__ JI\~~_---"''''-''''.--- P.rko~!q;,t,~~t~" ~""",,"...~,,,._,,,~. ~ 8 J DRAKEDRI\iE --- ,,6ß]' _._,..'..~... -:.,/;': "/ ,,('.>; .-, /~ /",. " -~~. ~ ./ i ....- /" ','" /' " ,#/ ,cJ< ~: /f"" .' # d" $' # WOlfE ROAD CONDOMINIUMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CAUFORNIA Zoning Plat Map S~!f¿Zf:f "'.. In -, "-"""""'--"-" := r..:' ~ ......~,."""".... ""'h,-«" #," ...._ .~.....,." ,~.,... .,.,." '~", " _". ",".~.·'."~"n "" ~"."'"'' ","..,." 4--35 DA-2005-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6361 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR V ALLCO FASHION PARK (1-DA-90) TO ENCOMPASS THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED IN U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05 AND TR-2005-04 FOR A 135 UNIT, TWO- AND THREE-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No(s).: Applicant: Location: DA-2005-01 Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the modification of a development agreement, (1-DA-90) to encompass the development proposed in U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, TR-2005-04 for a 135 unit, two- and three- story residential condominium development, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the subject Development Agreement meets the following requirements: 1) Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; 2) Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribe for, the land use district in which the real property is or will be located; 3) Is in conformity with and will promote public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice; 4) Is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare; 5) Will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or preservation of property values; and 6) Will promote and encourage the development of the proposed project by providing a greater degree of requisite certainly. 4-- 34 Resolution No. 6361 DA-2005-02 PaQe 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: January 10,2006 That the Development Agreement shall be modified to add a sub-section adding the development proposed in U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, TR-2005-04, in Section 2.2 Vested Elements of the development agreement as 1-DA-90, as vested elements of the development agreement; and That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for amendment is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based are contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. DA-2005-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT The Development Agreement Amendments are recommended for approval as shown in Exhibit A (City Council Ordinance). PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Giefer COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Gilbert Wong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission G:/plaIlIlÙlg!pdreport/res/DA-2005-01 4-37 TR-2005-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6360 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO REMOVE AND REPLACE TREES TO CONSTRUCT A 135 UNIT, TWO- AND THREE-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: TR-2005-04 (EA-2005-10) Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application to remove and replace trees as part of the construction of a 135 unit, two- and three- story residential condominium development, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, there are existing and proposed trees to mitigate the visual and privacy impacts of the proposed residential condominium development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application for Tree Removal is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TR-2005-04, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 10, 2006 are incorporated by reference herein. Lf-38 Resolution No. 6360 Page 2 TR-2005-04 January 10, 2006 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION Approval is based upon the Exhibit titled "Condominiums at Vallco" dated January 3,2006, consisting of Sheet 4, Tree Removal Plan, and Sheet 5, Landscape Plan, except as 2. LANDSCAPING The applicant shall: a. Submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. b. Maintain the existing landscape planter area, including existing trees, along the western property line. c. Provide for infill trees along the western property line where gaps currently exist, as determined by the Director of Community Development. The infill trees shall be redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Director of Community Development, and shall be field grown size. d. Plant a second row of redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Director of Community Development, within the landscape planter area to be retained along the western property line. Trees shall be field grown size. e. Provide up to thirty 24-inch box evergreen trees within the Cal Trans Right-of- Way landscape area adjacent to the project site and the Interstate 280 off-ramp. The applicant shall work with Cal Trans to secure approval for planting of these trees along the project site on Cal Trans property. f. Provide a double row of trees within the landscape area adjacent to the southern side of Building A facing the future parking structure site for additional screening. The type and size of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. g. Provide a second row of trees between Building A and Building B for additional screening. The type and size of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. h. Preserve the existing coast live oak as identified by the arborist report of August 9,2005 by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, if possible, and if it is not within the development area of the site. 3. TREE REPLACEMENT For each tree that was removed prior to approval of a Tree Removal Permit, two new trees shall be planted on site. 4. TREE PROTECTION MEASURES The applicant shall comply with the tree protection measures in the arborist report dated August 9,2005, and prepared by the City's Consulting Arborist, Barrie D. Coate and Associates. +-39 Resolution No. 6360 Page 3 TR-2005-04 January 10, 2006 5. TREE PROTECTION BOND A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Wong, Vice-Chair Miller, Saadati, Giefer COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Gilbert Wong Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission 4-tfo EXHIBIT A AkiHonda From: Richard Lowenthal Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:42 PM To: yikewang3@yahoo.com; Aki Honda; Steve Piasecki Subject: RE: suggestion for Vallco Condos project near Macy's Dear Yi-Ke and Sue Wang, Thank you for the suggestion. I've passed it on to our planning department. Sincerely, Richard Lowenthal From: yikewang3@yahoo.com [mailto:yikewang3@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:06 AM To: akih@cupertino.org; rlowenthal@cupertino.org; kwang@cupertino.org; pkwok@cupertino.org; dsandoval@cupertino.org; oma honey@cupertino.org Subject: suggestion for Vallco Condos project near Macy's Dear City Councilors, I am a resident of Merritt Dr., and would like to see the Valleo condominium project to be successful without creating safety/privacy issues for neighborhood. After attending the January 3rd city planning commission meeting, I realized that there was a new day care center planned in this project. Looking the site map, the day care center is shown very close to the future Valleo garage exit/entrance and condominium garage entrance, which generates much traffic around it. For the children¡:s safety and health reasons the location of the daycare should be changed. Besides, since the Valleo neighborhood has much concerns on the intrusion of privacy; and the 40 feet setback is simply not wide enough to ensure our privacy from the two story condos, so it is a good idea to put one story daycare and recreation centers at the current building D and E, which is adjacent to the existing neighborhood. At the same time, more spaces now are available at both end of build B and C (one- or two-bed condos) at eastern site. The layout will still keep similar number of units and will also increase the buffer zone between the new condos and the existing neighborhood. I hope the new layout suggestion will create a win-win situation for both the developers and neighbors. Thanking you for your consideration, Yi-Ke Wang ~~--~-----.-----...---,._~-----".."---.--~-.-- -----._---- Yahoo! Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP. 1/20/2006 4-L/1 Exhibit B CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Agenda Date: January 10, 2006 Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 Applicant (s): Mike Rohde (Vallco Shopping Center) Property Location: 10123 N. Wolfe Road Portion of property on the west side of N. Wolfe Road, south of Interstate 280, and just north of Macy's department store Application Summary: 1. Use Permit to construct 139 residential condominium units with an underground podium parking structure, an associated 1,600 square foot recreation facility, and a 4,000 square foot day care center. 2. Architectural and Site Approval for the 139 residential condominium unit complex and underground podium parking structure. 3. Zoning Map Amendment (Z-2005-05) to rezone a 5.19 acre site from P (Regional Shopping) to P (Res). 4. Modification of a Development Agreement (DA-2005-01) to encompass the development proposed in U-2005-16 and ASA-2005-11. 5. Tree Removal for the removal of trees from the project site. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Mitigated Negative Declaration recommended. The project will have no significant, adverse environmental impacts with the proposed mitigation measures. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the following applications with the recommended modifications to the plans as stated in this staff report: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration, EA-2005-10 2. Use Permit application, U-2005-16 3. Architectural and Site Approval, ASA-2005-11 4. Zoning Map Amendment, Z-2005-05 5. Modification to the Development Agreement, DA-2005-01 6. Tree Removal, TR-2005-04 4 - Lf2- Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 ValleD Residential Condominiums Page 2 Project Data: General Plan Designation: Commercial/Residential Current Zoning: P (Regional Shopping) Proposed Zoning: P (Residential) Specific PIan: Heart of the City Acreage (GrossfNet): 5.19 gross acres/4.37 net acres ResidentiaI Units: 139 units ResidentiaI Density: 26.8 units/ gross acres Building Height: Max 45 feet (3 stories), Min 30 feet (2 stories) Floor Area Ratio: .69 Project Consistency with: General Plan: Zoning: Specific Plan: Yes. No. Rezoning to allow residential uses. Yes EnvironmentaI Assessment: Mitigated Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: Mike Rohde, on behalf of Vallco shopping mall, has submitted applications to construct a residential condominium complex on a portion of the shopping center site located on the west side of North Wolfe Road, south of Interstate 280 and north of Macy's department store. The project site is currently an underutilized surface parking lot that serves as overflow parking for the shopping mall. The applicant has already obtained approval of a lot line adjustment from the City separating this 5.19 acre site from the remaining portions of the shopping mall. In recent months, the City received several comments from neighbors and members of the community voicing concerns about the proposed project. In response, Vallco held neighborhood meetings in September and November of 2005 to provide neighbors with updates to their project and to listen to neighborhood concerns. The following is a list of issues and comments that were raised by the neighbors: . Building Heights and Setbacks: Reduce buildings to two stories, particularly facing the residential neighborhood to the west; provide additional setbacks along the western property line for sufficient privacy protection. . Landscaping: Maintain existing trees along the western property line for privacy protection; trees currently provide only 50% solid coverage, infill where solid coverage of trees is not currently provided; buildings too close to existing trees will not survive without proper light and ventilation; plant large size, evergreen trees to infilllandscape area or preserve existing mature trees by relocating them on site; provide proper care to ensure the viability and health of landscáping in the planter area along the western wall; irrigation has not been provided for some time, provide proper irrigation for trees to be retained; disappointment that trees were cut in the planter area that previously provided additional privacy protection to adjacent neighbors. Lt - tJ3 Applications: U-200S-16, ASA-200S-11, Z-2005-0S, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-200S-10 Valko Residential Condominiums Page 3 · Pedestrian/V ehicular Access: Maintain solid wall between project site and the adjacent neighborhood; no pedestrian/ vehicular access from the project site into the adjacent neighborhood is desired. · Construction Activity: Ensure construction activities do not impact residential neighborhood, particularly at night. · Lighting and Balconies: Remove balconies on upper floors from units facing the western property line, neighbors do not want to see balconies from their yards; ensure that lighting from the condominiums do not impact adjacent residences. · Traffic Impacts: Concern that additional housing will create additional traffic impacts within the surrounding neighborhood, in addition to improvements being made to the shopping mall. · School Impacts: Concern that additional housing will create additional school impacts within the school districts; schools serving students in this area appear to be impacted. · Noise: Concern that additional noise from the condominium complex will affect the adjacent residential neighborhood. · Farmer's Market: Where will Farmer's Market be relocated once the project is under construction? In response to these concerns and at staff's recommendation, the applicant has modified the plans as of January 3, 2006, by modifying the site plan, reducing the number of units and height of buildings, and increasing the building setbacks along the western property line. DISCUSSION: Project Description The proposed project consists of a 139-unit, two- and three-story residential condominium complex located within five buildings over an underground podium parking garage. There will be a mix of 34 one-bedroom units, 84 two-bedroom units and 21 three-bedroom units within the complex. The project also includes an approximately 35,500 square foot recreation area at the northern tip of the site along Interstate 280 with a 1,600 square foot recreation facility for the condominium complex. Additionally, the applicant is proposing an approximately 4,000 square foot day care center at the south east corner of the site surrounded by a 4,000 square foot common open area and 8,000 square foot playground area. Further, a permeable landscaped emergency vehicle access (EVA) roadway is proposed along the western boundary of the site for Fire Department access through the development from Perimeter Road to the end of the recreation area. A landscaped courtyard consisting of pedestrian walkways enhanced by raised planter beds is proposed between the buildings over the podium parking garage. General Plan and Heart of the City Specific Plan The General Plan designation for the project site is Commercial/Residential. Therefore, the proposed residential condominium complex is consistent with the General Plan. It is anticipated that the proposed residential units will be allocated from the available 4-4+ Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 VaIlco Residential Condominiums Page 4 units in the Vallco Park South and Other (Commercial Centers) Areas as identified in the newly adopted General Plan. Currently, there are 400 units available for allocation within the Vallco Park South area and 300 units available in the Other (Commercial Centers) Areas. Although the proposed Toll Brothers project will also be drawing from the same allocation tables, it is anticipated that Vallco will need an allocation of 100 units from the Vallco Park South area and the remaining 39 units from the Other (Commercial Centers) Areas. On a case-by-case basis, the City may allocate units from Other Areas to accommodate project needs for additional unit allocations. Staff recommends that units be allocated when the Commission determines there are extraordinary public benefits associated with the application. The proposed project substantially complies with requirements of the Heart of the City Specific Plan, with the exception of the side yard setback requirement. Staff recommends that the applicant modify the plans to accommodate the required side yard setback along the east property line adjacent to the Interstate 280 Wolfe Road off- ramp. A further discussion of staff's recommendation is provided in the Staff Recommendation section at the end of this report. The following table indicates the project's compliance/non-compliance with the applicable requirements of the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Heart of the City Specific PIan ~. Item' .'" ,', ' , '. Reauired/Allowed , Prò1>osed " ,'.' , Conforms?, Use Commercial/Office Multi-Unit Residential Yes, as residential uses may be allowed an as ancillary use. The condominium project is ancillary to ya11co Fashion Park. Densitv 35 du/ or. acre 26.8 du/ or. acre Yes Rei.-ht Max. 45 feet Max. 45 feet Yes Setbacks: Front 9 feet (from Stevens Creek 60 feet (south) Yes. Project is not along Parkway Landscape Easement) Stevens Creek; therefore, the Parkway Landscape Easement setback does not apply. Sides 20 feet 40 feet (west) Yes 15 feet (east) No. Staff is recommending that the applicant modify plans to comply with this regulation. Rear 20 feet 70 feet (north) Yes Subsurface May not exceed 5 feet above 4 feet above grade level Yes Parking grade . Private Open 60 sf/ du = 8,340 sf. 11,120 sf. Yes Soace Public Open 150 sf./ du - 20,850 sf. 112,500 sf. Yes Space 4-'-/S Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, 2-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-1O ValIeo Residential Condominiums Page 5 Rezoning The project site is currently zoned P(Regional Shopping) or Planned Development (Regional Shopping) which does not allow for residential uses. The site is proposed to be rezoned to PeRes) to allow for the proposed residential uses. Rezoning of the site would also make it compatible with the existing General Plan land use designation for the site that allows for residential uses. DeveIopment Agreement In October of 2005, the City approved an extension to the eXistmg Development Agreement between Vallco Fashion Park and the City of Cupertino. The agreement vests certain uses within the Vallco shopping mall site and locks in the General Plan and zoning ordinances in effect at the time. However, non-retail uses are required to obtain a use permit; therefore, the proposed residential condominium development requires a use permit. Since approval of the use permit for the residential development is discretionary, the residential project is not vested. The development agreement needs to be amended to vest this specific residential project. Design Site, LeveI and Unit PIans The site plan indicates that the condominium complex will be accessed by N. Wolfe Road to the east and Perimeter Road to the south. The site is surrounded by single family residences to the west, N. Wolfe Road and the Interstate 280 off ramp to the east, Interstate 280 to the north and the existing Vallco shopping center to the south across Perimeter Road. The underground parking garage will be accessed by a parking ramp along the southern edge of the condominium complex facing Perimeter Drive. A 4,000 square foot day care center will be located on the southeast corner of the site surrounded by a 7-car parking lot to the north and an 8,000 square foot playground to the south. Additionally, the applicant is proposing a 4,000 square foot common open space area north of the day care center. Further, there will be a 1,600 square foot recreation facility located at the northern tip of the site for the condominium complex included within a 35,500 square foot recreation area. A 20-foot wide landscaped emergency vehicle access (EVA) lane will also be provided along the western side of the site terminating in a turnaround at the northern end of the site adjacent to the recreation area. The Level and Unit Plans indicate that there will be a mixture of one-, two- and three- bedroom units. One-bedroom units will be 675 square feet. Two-bedroom units will be 950 square feet. Three-bedroom units will be 1,550 square feet. Units proposed include 34 one-bedroom units, 84 two-bedroom units and 21 three-bedroom units. Except for units in Buildings D and E, all units will have direct access into the buildings from the underground garage through shared hallways. All first floor units will also have direct outdoor stoop entrances. Upper floors will have private balconies that serve as the private open spaces for the units. However, no balconies will be provided on Buildings 4-40 Applications: U-200S-16, ASA-200S-11, Z-200S-0S, DA-200S-0l, TR-200S-04, EA-200S-10 VaIleD Residential Condominiums Page 6 D and E facing the western property line. Each unit will have at least 60 square feet of private outdoor space in the form of the stoop decks or balconies. The parking garage will accommodate a total of 278 parking stall, 56 bicycle stalls, three elevator vestibules, four staircase exits and two underground trash rooms. All trash facilities to accommodate the development will be fully located within the underground garage; no outdoor trash enclosure areas are proposed. Architectural Design A contemporary architectural style is proposed for the two- and three-story buildings. The two-story buildings have a maximum height of 30 feet and the three-story buildings have a maximum height of 45 feet. The buildings will be constructed over an underground podium parking garage that will be approximately four (4) feet above grade level. Exterior materials include stucco walls with various complementary colors, brick applications on the stoop staircases, veneer ledgestone on the base of the buildings, metal awnings, metal decorative fins, and cornice trims. A materials board has been included within the applicant's plan set indicating the proposed color and material schemes. The City's Architectural Advisor, Larry Cannon, has reviewed the architecture and finds that the architectural design is well done in a modern idiom. However, he makes the following recommendations: · Refine wall caps to ensure positive wall terminations. It appears that there is limited treatment of wall tops in some areas. · Consider opening up the stoops and making them more individual in character (e.g. consider some stoops with open railings). · Consider modifying the design of the fins to open them up at the top or lighten their visual mass through use of perforated metal to relate to the trellises (e.g. metal like trellises). · Consider using only one masonry base material to give visual unity to the base. Parking A total of 285 parking spaces will be provided on site, including 278 underground parking spaces and 7 surface parking spaces. The surface parking spaces are located along the southern end of the project site to serve the proposed day care center. ' The project requires 2 parking spaces per unit (one of which must be covered) for a total of 278 parking spaces. The project is providing a total of 278 parking spaces for the residential portion of the project, which complies with the City's parking requirements. Additionally, 56 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. This complies with the City's requirements to provide a minimum of 40% of the number of number of units. . The Development Agreement requires Vallco Fashion Park to provide space for the relocation of an existing day care center on the mall property. Vallco is proposing to relocate the day care center at the southeast corner of the project site. The applicant has Lj-- 'f ~1 Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 VaIleo Residential Condominiums Page 7 not provided information on the number of children to be accommodated at this day care center. The City's parking requirement for day care centers is 1 parking space for each 6.5 students. It is anticipated that this parking can be accommodated through the shared use of parking for the condominium complex (e.g., underground parking that is not utilized during the day time hours) and the adjacent parking structure to be constructed across from the Macy's department store. Conceptual Landscape Plan and Tree Removal The proposed project will provide landscaping in the form of a large recreation area on the northern portion of the site, raised planter beds with trees and shrubs in the courtyard area above the podium parking garage, and a 4,000 square foot common area between the day care center and condominium complex. The courtyard will also be enhanced with paved walkways, garden shade elements, and water features. The majority of existing mature trees along the western property line adjacent to the masonry wall are proposed to be maintained for added privacy. Most of these trees are mature redwood and pine trees. According to a tree survey conducted by the City Arborist in August 2005, there are 256 trees located on the subject property and 9 trees in the exit ramp in the public right of way at N. Wolfe Road. There are no "Heritage" or "Specimen" trees on site as defined by the City's Heritage and Specimen Trees Ordinance; however, the ordinance does require the protection of all trees on site that were part of a previous site approval. Based on this requirement, all of the existing trees on the project site are to be protected, unless a tree removal permit is obtained. Of the total number of trees on site, there are 186 coast redwood trees that comprise approximately 70% of the trees on site. The redwood trees are primarily located along the perimeter of the site. Several of the trees are showing signs of drought stress as it appears that the irrigation system has been shut off or is non-existent. The proposed project will require the removal of several trees on site to accommodate the condominium complex; however, a majority of the existing redwood trees along the perimeter of the site are proposed to be retained. The City Arborist has recommended several measures for the protection and maintenance of the trees to be retained on site. These measures have been added as mitigation measures and conditions of approval to the project and reflect protective fencing measure, construction methods to protect the drip line areas around trees to be retained, and irrigation requirements. The applicant also removed several trees on site in September of 2005 to accommodate story pole equipment demonstrating the then-proposed building height and setbacks of the proposed condominium development. Many of these trees were already slated to be removed; however, some of the trees removed included redwoods along the western property line that could have possibly been retained. y-c¡~ Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 VaIleD Residential Condominiums Page 8 On December 14, 2005, the ERC recommended that the replacement ratio for those trees removed prior to a tree removal permit be a two new trees for each one that has been removed. The ERC further recommended that the existing landscape planter along the western wall be retained, the existing landscaping in that planter area be retained, an additional row of trees be planted within that planter area with field grown size, evergreen trees, and that the applicant provide infill trees where there are existing gaps between trees. The applicant prefers to plant smaller trees immediately such that they grow to a larger size by the time the project is completed and occupied. Traffic In November 2005, Fehr and Peers prepared a Transportation Impact Analysis based upon the project's previous plans for a 156 unit condominium complex. The study estimated the project to generate 937 new daily trips, including 74 new AM peak hour trips and 87 new PM peak hour trips. Ten key intersections were evaluated for the PM peak hour under the cumulative plus project conditions. The intersection of Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway is projected to degrade to LOS E during the PM peak hour under the cumulative plus project conditions. The unsignalized intersection of Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road is projected to worsen to LOS E during the PM peak hour under cumulative plus project conditions. The remaining intersections are projected to operate at LOSD or better during both peak hours. The project's contribution at the Wolfe Road/Vallco Parkway intersection during PM peak hours is only 1.7 percent and the existing field observations for the Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road intersection is 50 percent lower than the calculated delay. Therefore, the project's cumulative impact at these intersections are considered "less than significant." To mitigate the LOS E designation, the Public Works Department states that an additional right turn movement from west bound Valko Parkway to Northbound Wolfe Road can improve this intersection to LOS D. The Calabazas (Toll Brothers) project will be conditioned by the City to undertake this improvement; however, the proposed project may also be required as a mitigation measure to make a contribution to this improvement. No mitigation is required for the unsignalized intersection of Northbound Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road. However, the City will ask that the traffic study be amended to include suggestions for mitigations that would serve to improve the intersection. Further, the project will be conditioned to undertake or contribute to mitigation, if any, to improve the LOS of this intersection to an acceptable level. SchooI Impacts A school impact analysis was conducted by Townhall Services in November of 2005 for the proposed project based upon the previous plans for a 156 unit condominium complex. The study indicated that student generation rates for the condominium development are .19 for Cupertino Unified School District (CUSD) and .10 for Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD). Based on these student generation rates, an 4-QCJ Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 Vallco Residential Condominiums Page 9 enrollment impact of 39 students was estimated, including 21 students at Collins Elementary, 9 students at Lawson Middle School and 9 students at Cupertino High. The total grade enrollment impact is 3.0 students per grade. The facilities cost per student are anticipated to exceed facilities fee revenue per student by $2,482 per student at CUSD and by $9,176 per student at FUHSD. The operational costs are anticipated to exceed operational revenue at the impacted CUSD schools by $539. However, at FUHSD, there will be a net benefit of $10,199 per student. The City has received letters from FUHSD and CUSD that concurs with these assumptions made by Townhall Services and they have no objections to the project. FUHSD states that the school district is within 2 months of completing a long-range emollment study and school capacity study that may show that the cumulative effect of housing projects may push enrollment figures beyond school capacity. However, the letter states that school enrollment can be mitigated by portable classrooms. It should be noted that since this study was conducted, the applicant has reduced the number of units, which should further reduce the impacts onto the school districts. Noise Impacts A noise impact analysis was prepared by Illingworth and Rodkin, dated November of 2005, for the proposed project. The noise analysis states that the predominant noise sources affecting the site are Interstate 280, the Interstate 280 Wolfe Road off-ramp, and Wolfe Road. The study also states that noise from the Vallco shopping mall and future associated parking structure would also contribute to some insignificant noise levels near the southern portion of the site. The study indicates that exterior ground level noise exposure in the courtyard is calculated to be above 65 dBA between buildings. This is considered a "normally acceptable" noise environment. However, the recreation areal emergency vehicle access (EVA) turnaround area at the northern portion of the site near Interstate 280 is predicted to have a noise level of about 72 dBA. For outdoor use, this would be considered "normally unacceptable". The study indicates that the ground level noise in' this area could be reduced to 65 dBA Ldn or less with construction of a minimum 8 to 10 foot high soundwall along the property boundaries adjacent to Interstate 280 and the I-280 off-ramp. Most of the proposed residential units are anticipated to have exterior noise levels that exceed 60 dBA Ldn. Therefore, the project will be subject to noise control requirements per the State Building Code. This requirement includes providing each unit with forced air mechanical ventilation systems. For units facing Interstate 280 and the off-ramp, additional noise control treatments will be required. Conditions of approval have been added to address these issues to reduce the noise levels to acceptable levels. The noise study also recommended measures to mitigate construction equipment noise. These will also be incorporated into the conditions of approval. 4--5D Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 Vallco Residential Condominiums Page 10 Air Quality Impacts The proposed project is below the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) screening thresholds for projects with potentially significant emissions. Therefore, a study of air quality impacts to be generated from the project was not conducted. An air quality impact report was prepared by Illingworth and Rodkin, dated November of 2005, to assess the impacts and exposure of air pollution emissions from Interstate 280 traffic onto the proposed project. Additionally, the report assessed the impact of construction activities to air quality that will result from the proposed project. Under the BAAQMD CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) guidelines, the report found that exposure of diesel particulate matter (DPM) and carbon monoxide (CO) from I-280 traffic onto the proposed residential project, would be considered a less than significant impact. Therefore, the potential for violation of any air quality standard, exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people are less than significant. However, conditions of approval have been added for construction activity impacts that are standard conditions typically added to projects. Parkland The proposed project will be required to pay a park dedication fee in lieu of providing dedicated park land. Portions of this park dedication fee may possibly be used for improvements to the park to be constructed on the Toll Brothers site. Mfordable Housing Per the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) requirement, 15% of the units are required to be allocated as BMR units. Based upon a total of 139 condominium units, the BMR requirement is 21 units for the proposed project. Half of these BMR units will be available for median income levels and half will be available for moderate income levels. The City's Housing Committee reviewed the proposed project and expressed support for the proposed housing development with the additional comment that provisions be made to support pedestrian connections from the project site to the adjacent shopping mall. Sanitary Sewer The site is currently connected to the Sanitary District. Vallco is currently working to expand the sanitary sewer lines to accommodate the various projects proposed on the shopping mall site. According to the Sanitary District, the proposed project will significantly impact the sanitary sewer, and existing sewer relocation máy be a requirement for service for the proposed improvements. A condition requires that the necessary improvements be completed prior to building occupancy. L/- - ---s / Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 Valko Residential Condominiums Page 11 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Upon review of the proposed project, staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the following modifications to the plans: 1. Modify the site plan to accommodate the required minimum 20 foot side yard setback per the Heart of the City Specific Plan. The proposed project provides only a 15 foot setback. Staff recommends that the Buildings Band C be shifted further west to accommodate the additional setback, which will likely result in the reduction of a few of the units. 2. The proposed roadway entrance (Perimeter Road) from Wolfe Road appears to have been radically changed which will require the removal of several existing mature trees along Perimeter Road. The roadway should be modified so that there is a less severe turning radius into the project site. This will allow retaining the existing trees along Perimeter Road, and allow expansion of open space area around the proposed day care center at the southeast corner of the site. Reducing the day care center (e.g., to 3,600 square feet) will also facilitate additional area for an expanded open space area. The expanded open space area should be a prominent entrance feature at the corner of the site and incorporate passive recreational green space (e.g. green space with benches). The day care and playground area for the day care may be located adjacent to this open space area. 3. The proposed driveway entrance and surface parking lot for the day care center is awkward. Remove the need for a "parking lot" and provide surface parking spaces that can back out (e.g., perpendicular parking) directly into the driveway. Modify the driveway so that it serves both the condominium complex and the day care center. 4. Reduce units to a maximum of 135 residential units for the project. Eliminate the easternmost units on Building A and reduce the west side of Building A along the westerly property line to a 2-story building height, matching the height of Buildings D and E. Shift Buildings Band C, where possible, further north to allow for expanded park land area. 5. Maintain the existing landscape planter area along the western perimeter of the property as recommended by the ERe. 6. Provide a second row of redwood trees, or other acceptable evergreen trees as determined by the Community Development Director, within the landscape planter along the western perimeter of the site. Trees approved for planting within the vyestern landscape planter area shall be field grown size as recommended by the ERe. 7. Provide up to thirty 24-inch box evergreen trees within the Cal Trans Right-of- Way landscape area adjacent to the project site and the Interstate 280 off ramp. The applicant shall be required to work with Cal Trans to secure approval for planting of these trees along the project site on Cal Trans property. 8. Add a condition requiring that any and all future property owners will receive disclosure of the potential for noise impacts from the parking garage to be constructed adjacent to the Macy's department store across from the project site. 4-- f) J- Applications: U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-05, DA-2005-01, TR-2005-04, EA-2005-10 VaIleD Residential Condominiums Page 12 9. Provide an extension to the existing soundwall along the western perimeter of the site to provide for additional privacy screening and sound mitigation from the project site. Staff believes that with these changes, including the lowered building height along the western property line, the additional open space along the Wolfe Road entrance to the project site, and the additional support this project will bring to the Vallco shopping mall, the proposed development will offer a positive and added benefit to the community. The extraordinary public benefits that justify allocating up to 35 units from the Other (Commercial Centers) Area category include the following: 1. Financial support for the public garage which is needed for the AMC Theaters that will help revitalize the Vallco mall. 2. One-half acre highly visible open space area encompassing the day care center. 3. Greater setbacks and lowered building heights coupled with substantial additional tree plantings along the west and east property lines that will buffer and reduce visibility of the development. ENCLOSURES Exhibit A: Various letters from neighbors and members of the community Exhibit B: Letter from Fremont Union High School District, dated December 7, 2005 Exhibit C: Letter from Cupertino Unified School District, dated December 6, 2005 Exhibit D: Memo from Glenn Goepfert, Public Works Dept., dated December 13, 2005 Initial Study (including arborist, traffic, school impacts, noise, and air quality studies) and ERC Recommendation Plan Set **ModeI Resolutions including conditions of approvaI for the project will be made availabIe prior to the PIanning Commission meeting. Submitted by: Aki Honda, Senior Planner , Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen~ G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\pcl[sereporfs \ l[-2005-16.doc Lj--5; EXHIBIT A Aki Honda From: Yi-Ke Wang [ywang@ati.com] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 20053:41 PM To: Aki Honda; yikewang3@yahoo.com Cc: suechangw@yahoo.com Subject: Concerns of condominum proposal at North West of Vallco Mall Hi Ms Honda, I am a resident lived by Vallco Fashion Park. After hearing the presentation from Mike Rohde and Kirk Ellis from Vallco and P+R architects, I am raising some concerns shown below related to this Vall co resident condominium project. I would like city planners and arborists can exam and review them thoughtfully. Concerns 1. Limit building height below 36-feet Reason: The construction site is not in Vallco Park District ( bounded by Wolf, Homestead, Tantau, and Steven Creeks Blvd), or Wolf Corridor area. There is no reason to violate the regular building height limit at 36-feet. 2. Setback to 35-feet away from residential boundary Reason: Building-to-curb setback for most of Cupertino's street is set to 35-feet.These street trees around Cupertino city have the same size and height as redwoods trees between residential and condominium wall. It is vital for redwood trees to growth healthy. It also keep fire clearance, and sight privacy. 3. Raise height of window sills which facing residential zone Reason: It can limit visual intrusion from upper units of condominium. 4. Provide good landscaping plan to keep redwoods trees healthy Reason: Healthy redwoods trees needs water and sun light (refer to setting setback at 35-feet) 5. Lower housing unit density below 23 units/Acre Reason: Lower housing unit can reduce traffic jam and raise quality of school education. 6. Moving mature trees from construction site to residential boundary Detail: Relocate some existing trees and plant them at some holes between existing redwoods trees. Its not a good idea to cut mature trees. 7. Come up an environmental report for noise, light, air, and traffic impact Detail: Need City planner to investigate noise, light, air fiow, and traffic impact for this project. For instance, the straight wall of the building will cause negative impact on noise refiection and air fiow. Best regards, Concerned resident by Vallco Fashion Park Yi-Ke Wang 9120/2005 L/- sLf Kiersa Witt From: Sent: To: Subject: ginmick@eomeast.net Sunday, September 18, 2005 2:26 PM City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Valleo Fashion Park Dear Planning Commission, OK. Now I have two postcards regarding the redoing of Valleo Fashion Park. The first postcard to arrive indicates a "Rose Bowl Site, etc. The second postcard concerns Mike Rohde's three-story condominium development. So I'm a bit confused, here. Is Rohde's development a subset of the Rose Bowl site, or an entirely different consideration? Please enlighten me. Thank you, Ginnie Mickelson 20288 Pacifica Drive Cupertino 408-252-7425 1 ~/- ss- Page I of 1 AkiHonda From: Mala Narayan [malanarayan@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, September 18, 200512:12 PM To: Aki Honda Subject: Application #: TM-2005-06 (EA-2005-10), TR-2005-04, ASA-2005-11, U-2005-16, 2-2005-05, GPA- 2005-04, DA-2005-01 Mr. Honda, I am writing in protest for the subdivision of the 5.19 acre property as well as rezoning it to a shopping/residential development. I have listed few reasons as to why this is not a good idea for the city and residents of Cupertino. I. The city is already up to its neck on condominiums and apartments. The condominiums under construction at the intersection of Finch Avenue and Steven Creek Blvd are expected to increase the city population and affect the schools. With the budget cuts in place, the schools will have no capacity to expand and/or take in more students. 2. In order to construct the condominiums the existing trees will be chopped off. As such we are losing so much greeneries, it is criminal to lose more. 3. These two storey condominiums will encroach on the privacy of residents like us who are on the other side of the wall. We don't want them to be looking in to our backyard when we are having a private party. 4. In all probability the residents will no longer be able to avail of the weekly Farmer's market that opens up on the adjacent parking lot. This farmer's market has been a great boon for getting fresh produce to the local community, especially senior citizens. 5. The construction work will take away the parking lots and open areas that are a great convenience to the shoppers at Vallco Mall. We may need them with the new movie theatres that are already under construction. I would appreciate if you can take these facts in to consideration and reject the proposal in the interests of Cupertino residents. Sincerely, Malleswari Narayan 19639 Merritt Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 4-50 9/20/2005 labels Kiersa Witt From: ajay jhigan [ajhigan@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:06 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: regd.vallco fashion park hello sirlmadme i think we need shopping centre better than any condominiums. so pls.i dont vote for any other project rather than shopping centre. thanks aJ 4-57 9/19105 Page I ofl Aki Honda From: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:56 AM To: Aki Honda; Ciddy Wordell Cc: Steve Piasecki Subject: FW: Mike RohdeNallco condo proposal -----Original Message----- From: paulette altmaier [mailto:paltmaie@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 20052:41 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Mike Rohde/Vallco condo proposal I wish to most strongly register my disagreement with the proposed development of 156 condos on 5.6 acres. The entire plan for Vallco including the condos is on the same horrendous lines as the monstrosity of a development occupying the City Center site. I am sick of these overly dense, massive development blocks, and I vehemently oppose General Plan amendments and rezoning to permit it to be erected. Paulette Altmaier 22605 Salem Ave Cupertino 9/20/2005 4-5 rb labels Kiersa Witt From: Richard Bernhardt [rbernhardt@sprintmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 12:49 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Valco Fashion Park Proposed Residential Subdivision and Three Story Condominium Development Sunday, September 17th, 2005 Dear Honorable Members of the Cupertino Planning Department and Commission: As a long-time resident of Cupertino, I have seen a trend allowing bigger, higher and more density intense development. The result has been a very noticeable erosion of the general look and feel of Cupertino. The continued changes to the General Plan and rezoning of parcels for more intensive uses has resulted in increased traffic, properties that appear "overbuilt" for the neighborhood, noise and formidable infrastructure impact. I cannot agree therefore with the plan to build 156 units of condominiums (three stories in height) on the property located south ofI-280 and west of Wolf road (application of Mike Rohde on behalf of Vall co Fashion Park). Simply put, a 31 unit per acre density in this location is just too high and will be too impactful to the surrounding area. I also question the appropriateness of this type of residential density use in this area given the surrounding commercial, retail and light-industrial uses nearby. Cupertino has gone from a city oriented towards single family dwelling and light to moderate density dwellings one that entertains frequent high impact uses (see e.g. City Center). While the popular sentiment is that anything "housing" especially high density is needed in the Bay Area, that concept becomes a never ending expansion proposition that feeds itself. The growth should be measured and appropriate for the site and surrounding location and the infrastructure should not be severely impacted by the development (this includes schools, police coverage, traffic noise, water & power, and etc.). General Plan changes and rezonings should be taken very seriously and only entertained where the use is vital and appropriate and planned for in advance in the General Plan. To make radical changes to the General Plan on a parcel by parcel basis negates the reason for the General Plan in the first place. Please consider these views in your deliberations on this property development application. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Sincerely, Richard Bernhardt 1142 Kentwood Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-5808 4---59 9/19/05 labels Kiersa Witt From: paulette altmaier [paltmaie@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 20052:41 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Mike RohdeNallco condo proposal I wish to most strongly register my disagreement with the proposed development of 156 condos on 5.6 acres. The entire plan for Vallco including the condos is on the same horrendous lines as the monstrosity of a development occupying the City Center site. I am sick of these overly dense, massive development blocks, and I vehemently oppose General Plan amendments and rezoning to permit it to be erected. Paulette Altmaier 22605 Salem Ave Cupertino 4-00 9/19/05 Aki Honda From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Monday, September 19, 2005 8:57 AM Aki Honda; CiddyWordeJl Steve Piasecki FW: VaJleo Fashion Park -----Original Message----- From: ginmick@comcast.net [rnailto:ginmick@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, September lB, 2005 2:26 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. subject: Vallco Fashion Park Dear Planning Commission, OK. Now I have two postcards regarding the redoing of Valleo Fashion Park. The first postcard to arrive indicates a "Rose Bowl Site, etc. The second postcard concerns Mike Rohde's ~hree-story condominium development. So I'm a bit confused, here. Is Rohde's development a subset of the Rose Bowl site, or an entirely different consideration? please enlighten me. Thank you I Ginnie Mickelson 20288 Pacifica Drive Cupertino 40B-252-7425 1 Lf-- (ç I Aki Honda From: Sent: To: Subject: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Monday, September 19, 2005 8:57 AM Aki Honda FW: Application from Mike Rohde -----Original Message----- From: Greg Labmeier [rnailto:glabmeier@mac.com] Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 9:12 PM To: city of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Application from Mike Rohde I am interested in knowing where exactly the new 5.19 acre lot is going to be developed. The post card i received mentioned that it is "south of i-280 and "west of wolfe road". Where is it in comparison to steven's creek? Thank you. Greg Labmeier 1 4-- (¡,,, AkiHonda From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Monday, September 19, 2005 3:35 PM Colin Jung Aki Honda FW: Vailco Fashion Park Update - Courtesy Notice -----Original Message----- From: Lyn Faust [mailto:lynfaust@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 3:09 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Vallco Fashion Park Update - Courtesy Notice As suggested, I visited the City's website for info, but the most recent Development Activity Report I found was July, 2005. So, either nothing more current has been posted, or I missed a link somewhere? I went looking for answers to the following comments/questions, so I'll just include them here. What are the plans for our Farmer's Market, if residential condos and a parking garage go in north of Macy's (as per notice)? Also, I have real concerns about easy access to parking (not just large parking towers in two additional locations). Today's society seems adverse to walking very far and with exciting new development at the enhanced center, I wonder if that's being taken into enough consideration. An example of my concern where successful redevelopment has occurred on a smaller scale and parking has been impacted is the recent opening of the Pete's Coffee and panera's complex on Stevens Creek Blvd. Have you tried to park there? The Bombay Oven next door is understandably unhappy about the overflow parking extending into their lot, especially at lunch time. People are being referred to Target and I can't imagine that they'd be too thrilled knowing that either. I'm wondering who was responsible for assessing the parking allocation for those businesses. That's perhaps a minor example of what could happen at Vallco where I think parking will be key, especially when theatres are operating during their peak activity periods. the latter won't occur just a night. Many bargain hunting movie goers prefer the less expensive and quieter daytime matinees and during summer months people of all ages will also visit the theatres more often during the daytime hours. they will compete with shoppers for parking spaces. Finally, regarding Vallco's request to amend their Development Agreement and extend the term for five years and their desire to complete the above developments "under the terms of the original agreement". Exactly, what agreement details does that refer to and does keeping it under the current agreement benefit the Center or City (read 1 4-~s taxpayer/sales tax revenues) . Thanks for whatever info you can provide either by email, or when the web site is updated, or Ilm redirected to the appropriate link. Lyn Faust Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors I Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com 2 +~ Page 1 of 1 Aki Honda From: Sue Chang [suechangw@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:44 PM To: Aki Honda Subject: Against Vallco Mall 156 Unit Condominiums Dear Planner, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed 156 units condominium project at Vall co. The 20 feet setback and 42 feet heights of the building makes the proposed project absoiutely unacceptable to our neighborhood. It not only greatly invades our privacy, but also poses a huge safety threat to our properties, not to mention that it will block the morning sun light and will impede the growth of the redwoods planted by the property line. The mere 20 feet setback for those rows of three story condo buildings will invade not just our privacy of the front yards, side yards, back yards, but also our indoor privacy. Moreover, if the condo buildings catch fire, the flames would easily spread over to the dry redwood leaves or branches and onto our roofs, which was the lesson we learned from Santana Row not too long ago. Also, if an earthquake occurred, the condo building might topple down onto our property and endanger our properties and our lives. Furthermore, the 20 feet setback will greatly hurt the roots of the redwoods and endanger them during the construction. Just imagine how deep and wide the foundation will be for a three- story condo building plus the underground parking garage! Even if the redwoods survive, gradually the trees will lean onto our side because of the morning sunlight blocked by the condos, which will cause property damage, especially during the storm seasons. If this happened, then the trees would have to be removed and we would lose the only screen between our property and the condominium buildings. If this scenario happened, who would be responsible? In addition, who can replace those 40+ years old redwoods? We all know that redwoods are protected in California. The other concern is that since the building is too close to the trees, the future residents of the condo might legitimately demand to cut the redwoods branches and it would make our property even less private. Besides, to build such a crowded housing units on the proposed site will not necessarily increase revenue to the City as the Vallco management claims, rather it will be certain to bring more problems to the traffic and schools, and might increase the crime rate in our community as well. Unless Vallco Mall is willing to modify the plan and takes all of our concerns into account, we sincerely ask the Planning Commission to deny the proposed 156 units condo project. Sincerely, Yi-ke Wang & Su-chen (Sue) Chang 19625 Merritt Drive, Cupertino 408-252-5335 Nicholas Timashenki 19630 Merritt Drive, Cupertino 408-257-8921 Yahoo! for Good Cli.c;kþere\Q dormlS' to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 9/20/2005 4--&6 March 6, 2005 Page I of I Aki Honda From: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Tuesday, September 20,200511:18 AM To: Aki Honda Subject: FW: Vallco Fashion Park - Update -----Original Message----- From: Rich Dayton [mailto:richdayton@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:04 AM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Vallco Fashion Park - Update 1) Thanks for the mailing on this project. 2) Under www.cl!per!iOQ.or.g I was not able to find any information on Vallco following the directions in the lower right hand corner of the post card. 3) Cupertino is becoming a pure bedroom community; we have lost a number of businesses in the past several years and are allowing huge condominium complexes to be built or they are being proposed. I live on Bubb road; I cannot leave the house from 7:30 am until after 9 am without forcing my way into school traffic (people dropping off their kids). With the additional condo projects proposed at Bubb and McClellan this traffic probiem is only going to get worse. I hope you are not creating a traffic problem at Vallco or other areas like exists at Valley Fair. Rich Dayton 11236 Bubb Road Cupertino, CA ------------------------------------------------------------------- The Dayton Law Firm Richard C. Dayton Voice: 408 437-7570; Fax: 408 437-7509; Pager: 408473-0670; Cell: 408 666-5147 Web: www.taxandestatepianners.com wwm~ 4-0~ Page 1 of I Aki Honda From: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1 :09 PM To: Aki Honda Subject: FW: Feedback on Valco Fashion Park redevelopment. -----Original Message----- From: kramadas@comcast.net [ma ilto: kramadas@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:52 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Feedback on Valco Fashion Park redevelopment. I support redevelopment of the Valleo Fashion Park. However, I am not in favor of mixed residential and commercial development. I also hope that the development plan will stick to the height restrictions that will go on the Novemeber ballot measure. Cupertino should retain its uniqueness of quite residential neighborhood and create an environment where young families are able to bring up their children in residential neighborhoods with walking access to home schools and neighborhood parks. I was not able to come to the city council meeting yesterday and I am sending in my comments on the plan by email. Krishna Ramadas 12 year Cupertino resident 9/2112005 4-~& 7 OCl G ~j 2005 October I, 2005 To: Cupertino Planning Commission Subject: Recent CourtèSy Notices 1 have lived in the Santa Clara Valley all my life and in Cupertino for 26 years so 1 am very familiar with the changes that have taken place. Although I support growth of our community and recognize the need for city revenues, 1 am saddened by the growth of recent housing developments and the plan for more. The traffic on our city streets is terrible and more housing will make it worse. 1 see the new developments on Stevens Creek and the proposed one on Pruneridge.. How can our streets and our schools accommodate these new residents? I do not agree with the plan to convert Vallco to a multiplex theatre. Ifwhat 1 have been reading is accurate, theatre revenues are down due to the cost of tickets (and the food they sell), also due to the fact that many people seem more interested in getting the movie on DVD and enjoying it in their own home. What will you do if the theatre business continues to decline? Each new or remodeled commercial strip seems to have the same businesses, namely, fast food (Quiznos/Subway), hair and nails, a wireless phone service and a coffee shop I get the feeling the Planning Commission is simply reactive and not "Planning" for appropriate growth. d, lfhank you, L Þ. // ~ Ot/U-~ I Jo~hWalbe 19856 Beekman Place Cupertino 4-&t¿ Aki Honda From: Sent: To: Subject: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Thursday, October 06, 2005 1 :53 PM Aki Honda ' FW: Public hearing for Vallco Fashion Park new condominium development -----Original Message----- From: shiow-wen lee [mailto:shiowenlee@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:20 AM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Cc: shiowenlee@hotmail.com Subject: FW: Public hearing for Valleo Fashion Park new condominium development > > >Dear Sirs/ Madam, > >This email is to response to the public hearing notice for Valleo Fashion >Park subdivide project on 9/27/05 & 10/lS/05. > >We people live in Cupertino like the environment and great school district, >recently we found out more and more condominiums and apartments have been >built to fulfill the need of housing market. Itls good to see our city >council try to provide more affordable housing in this nice neighborhood. > >However, the education budget cut raises the concern about the quality of >the education, with lesser money but more and >more people try to move into Cupertino I the size of class is getting bigger >and we don't know if our school district realize this situation. Our kids >will be facing crowded and less attention due the size of class. > >I urge the city planning department and council to consider this situation >seriouslYI since this will affect the traffic and school qualitYI unless >our >school district can expend the facilities and teachers to accommodate this >situation. > >Regards, > >Cupertino Resident Sam Wang and Shiow-Wen Lee 1 (/--09 Page I of I Aki Honda From: Kiersa Witt on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:19 PM To: Aki Honda Subject: FW: Vallco expansion and Fermer's Market -----Original Message----- From: Vanya Matzek [mailto:VanyaMatzek@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:20 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Vallco expansion and Fermer's Market Gentlebeings: When considering the expansion of Valleo, please do not forget that the weekly Farmer's Market, held in a Valleo parking lot, is a valuable community resource. Vanya & Denise Matzek 408.255-0108 10963 Northfield Square Cupertino, CA 95014 vanyaMatzek@MSN.com o Hot smiley emoticon 1011212005 4- '10 ¡;-, '-", X:'\'il_ ,..~:.... " ^ ..' .L I~O!J5 To: Cupertino Planning Commission I am the owner of the property at 10291 Norwich Avenue. I object to the construction of 156 condominiums at Vallco Fashion Park for the following reasons: I. This a large increase of high density housing to the area causing increased traffic and burden on the schools for which Cupertino is known. This project will likely decrease the property values of existing single family homes nearby where a major allure is spaciousness and tranquility. It will also likely decrease the strength of the Cuperinto school district by dramatically increasing the number of attending children. Weakening of the renowned Cupertino schools will likely decrease property values of existing homes. 2. This large construction is going to impose on the privacy of existing single family homes near Vallco. The tall buildings of the high density house will look over the existing homes, causing loss of privacy and feel of tranquility. This will decrease property values. 3. Removal of any existing barrier such as sound walls and service streets and trees will impact the privacy and tranquility of properties now protected by these barriers, resulting in decrease desirability for the existing homes. 4. If the project is approved, I will be forced to sell my property. I demand compensation for any loss in value of the property as well as the trouble and expenses of replacing this property with another one, including the increase in assessed property tax which occurs when exchanging properties. '-1--7/ City of Cupertino: EFMHome ? '.J; HELP Case Details I print I Close I Case Number: 15971 Customer: Martin, Julie , ~g 10183 Colby Avenue Cupertino CA 95014 4082539449 baymartin4@hotmail.com Status: New Location of Request: Preferred Contact Method; Email Request Type: Complaint Submitted By: Martin, Julie customer Primary Owner: Honda, Aki TopiC: Planning> Zoning Date/Time Created: 11/01/2005 23:13 Date/Time Closed: Original Request To all city council members. First, my family just watched the November 1st city council meeting. I am outraged at what the city council believes is dialog between our community and the Vallco developers. The developers presented a preliminary plan, which changed from the previous meeting, to our community. No feedback from the community was given other than one attendee complaining about the lack of clarity in the presentation. How does simply having a meeting constitute dialog or agreement with the community's wishes, Again, no one has addressed, in writing, whether the wall between the Valco property and our community near Merritt Drive will be opened. If the City council wants to ensure the community and the developers have a dialog then please force the developers to present their plan on this site as well as in the Cupertino Courier and, in that plan, address the issue of the wall as well as their ultimate plans for the northeast portion of the Vallco property. Second, the council has not addressed how more high density housing will impact our already overcrowded schools. At Collins Elementary, classes have been held in the library and the music room this year. Our daughter had to switch teachers three weeks into the year due to the overcrowding. So how is our school going to accomodate all of the i new residents from the planned developments? I would appreciate a response to this : message. Sincerely, Lloyd Martin L____,__..._..__ __________,____.._" _____ ___,__________________________,__.._,________ r-------- ---- ------- - - - - ,----- ------ - -- ---- , Customer Communications I No records of communication activities found ! '-----------1 I I i .----_.. Internal Activity Internal Notes h ttps: // c I i ents. comcate. com/reps/ caseDetai I. p hp Page I of2 4-72, 11/3/2005 Page I of 1 Aki Honda From: yikewang3@yahoo,com Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 9:10 PM To: Aki Honda: yikewang3@yahoo.com; suechangw@yahoo.com Subject: Concerns of Condominums project at Vallco Dear Ms. Honda, I am a resident who lives at 19625 Merritt Dr., which is adjacent to the Vallco Mall sound wall. I would like to present my concems on the Vallco Condominiums project located at North ofMacy, based on two points described below, I. As an engineer, even not an architect, I can tell how inappropriate the site layout it is, especially the two buildings at the westem perimeter of the site. They are too close to the proposed emergency access lane, as well as the redwood trees. The developer wants to take advantage of the maximum 30 units/acre ordinance, totally not take into consideration of environmental issues and the privacy of neighborhood and the living quality of the future residents in these condos. I urge that City councils should seriously take into consideration of the living quality and safety on both sides of the neighborhood, if the rezoning for housing at Vallco is passed, NOT just the profit gain for i §housing i" developers. 2. This developer wants to take the advantage of maximum 30 units/acre ordinance if the rezoning proposal is passed. But remember this site is not a well shaped land (some unused sharp corner space at northern side). In addition, there is some space reserved for 1600 SF recreational building and I 0,000 SF for surrounding green area. The actual size for living space is about 4.5 acres, where can be built for ONLY 130 units maximum. This estimation also supports what I pointed out above, that those two 3- bed-room buildings at western perimeter shouldn¡it be in the project. Again, I urge City officials take a close look on this housing proposal and take into consideration seriously for the living quality and safety of the residents of Cupertino, then you will be able to make a wise decision to reject this overly crowed condo project crammed into the beautiful site on north of Macy¡:s. Thanks so much for dedicating your efforts to the bright future of City of Cupertino. Sincerely Yours, Yi-Ke & Su-Chen Wang 19625 Merritt Dr. Nicholas Timashenki 19630 Merritt Dr. Yahoo! for Good - MakelUjjfl§.r.ence thi.~L~r. 4-13 1/5/2006 EXHIBIT B ..--;--- /~QNT /;..,,«; / t.!:~ , . I I;:S~ a 'Q~ .& ~ $~ '~("'4i' ¡",vI:!: . 8. CE IN "<\.<::> C'/iOOL\) " FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Cupertino, Fremont, Homestead, Lynbrook, Manta Vista High Schools and Adult/Community Education Stephen R. Rowley, Ph.D., Superintendent afSchools December 7, 2005 Ms. Cynthia Wordell, City Planner City of Cupertino 10300 TOlTe Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Ms. Aki Honda, Associate Planner City of Cupertino 10300 TOlTe Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Response to the proposed Landmark Properties, L.L.C. Valko Residences Project Fiscal and Enrollment Impact Analysis Dear Ms. Wordell and Ms. Honda: It is my understanding that the City of Cupertino Planning Commission will soon be holding a hearing on the proposed Vallco Residences residential development, Landmark Properties L.L.c. being the developer. I have reviewed the Vallco Residences Fiscal and Enrollment Impact Report (Report) prepared by Town Hall Services. Per your request, this correspondence represents my position regarding the project. On previous occasions I have commented on similar proposed residential projects, as well as the recently adopted City of Cupertino General Plan Update. The Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD) appreciates the opportunity to respond to City staff in areas where proposed development will have an impact on FUHSD schools. Below, I offer some additional comments that highlight the District's perspective as it relates to the Vallco Properties proposed 156 residential condominiums project. I. The Student Generation Rate (SGR) of 0.10 used in the Report for projected emollment impacts is appropriate and accepted by both the City of Cupertino and FUHSD. A net of approximately 9 students will likely be generated from this project. These students will be enrolled at Cupertino High School. 2. As stated in the fiscal impacts section of the Report, the development impact fee revenue is nearly $83,000 less than the total facilities cost impact to house the 9 students generated as a result of the proposed project. This is not a benefit to the District. 3. It is estimated that the assessed valuation of the property will generate mol'e property tax revenue to FUHSD than the cost of the students coming from the project. The estimated amount of revenue in excess of the cost per student is roughly $10,000. This is a financial benefit to the District (see Report discussion for operational revenue and impacts). SO.HW OF TRl/~TEt.'S: Kathryn Ho, Avie Kat::, Nancy A. NewlolJ, Barbara F Nunes, HOllier H.C TO/Ig 4-7~ 589 West Fl-emont Avenue Posi Ollíce Box F AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ErdPLOYER (408) 522-2200 FAX (408) 245-5325 htlp:! /ww\,J, fuhsd _orgl SEnnv'.':¡[e. ('A 9··1-037 · Page 2 Re: Landmark Properties VaIleo Residences Project December 7, 2005 4. In a previous letter to the City regarding the impact of growth on the capacity of our schools, I stated that we were within two months of completing a long-range enrollment study, as well as a school capacity study. We are not yet done with those studies. However, I reiterate my concern that the cumulative effect of housing projects, especially in the Cupertino High School attendance area, may in fact push our student emollment figures beyond school capacity. 5. Unlike an elementary school, where emollment increases can be mitigated by portable classrooms, the impact of increased emollment in high schools does not have an easy solution. When a high school's emollment substantially exceeds its capacity, it creates extreme pressure on course offerings and core facilities during the day (e.g., lunchroom or library). There is no specific number that qualifies as "substantially exceeds." However, we must be very wary of the cumulative effects on one school that would create more tban a 10% increase above its capacity. 6. The planned developments in the Vallco portion of the City will generate student growth in the Cupertino High School attendance area. The total magnitude of those projects is 966 units, with a cumulative enrollment impact of 95 students, much greater than just the Valleo Residences impact of 9 students if considered individually. Regardless of the dollar figures that will help mitigate the impact of growth, I am concerned in that these projects will have a negative impact on school capacity and its core facilities. The Fremont Union High School District staff will continue to cooperate with the City's staff to evaluate each new development proposal based on the impact to our general fund, school capacity, and physical facilities. We will do so on a proposed project-by-project basis, as well as continuing to assess the cumulative impacts of development over time. Sill~ M- tw( Stephen R. R, owley () Superintendent I I , C: FUHSD Board of Trusteesp 4 -1S- EXHIBIT C Superintendent William E. Bragg, Ph.D. Board of Education Pearl Cheng Ben Uao Josephine Lucey Gary McCue George Tyson Cupertino Union School District 10301 Vista Drive . Cupertino, California 95014-2091 . (408) 252-3000 . Fax (408) 255-4450 December 6, 2005 Ahi Honda,. Senior Planner City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Dear Ahi, RE: Vallco Condominium Project I am responding to your request for final comment on the Vallco Condominium Project. The district has reviewed the enrollment and fiscal impacts of this project as part of the cumulative effects report prepared by Town Hall Services. The district concurs with the cresults as presented. Of special note is the facilities funding shortfall. The Town Hall Services study only projects the student growth ftom development. It does not attempt to forecast the future district total enrollment. Other factors may effect capacity other than development. The Fremont High School District contracted demographer has completed his work for them and in the process has developed a data base that will also enable our district to better project the overall impacts of all types of growth. We have engaged him to assist us with these projections. Once his analysis is completed, we will have a better basis for substantive comment regarding the overall cumulative impacts of all future development. At the present, the district would not have any formal basis for objecting to this particular project, noting however that there may be a facilities funding shortfall. The district also continues to reserve the right to direct students ftom any project to attend schools that may be able to better accommodate growth. Sincerely, Isl Rick Hausman Chief Business Officer Cupertino Union School District 4--7& EXHIBIT D City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408)777-3333 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Ralph A. Qualls, Jr., Director MEMORANDUM DATE: December 13,2005 TO: Aki Honda, Community Development FROM: Glenn Goepfert, Public Works SUBJECT: Transportation Impact Analysis for the Proposed Vallco Northwest Residential Development: Comments After review ofFehr and Peers' draft transportation analysis/traffic study for the subject project, we offer the following comments. I. It appears that the project will contribute to traffic impacts at the following studied intersections: a. Homestead Road and Wolfe Road; b. Wolfe Road and I-280 NB ramps; c. Wolfe Road and I-280 SB ramps; d. SB Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road e. NB Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road f. Perimeter Road and Vallco Parkway. g. Perimeter Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard; h. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road 1. Vallco Parkway and Wolfe Road Appropriate mitigations of the impacts will be undertaken and/or contributed to by the project. None of the intersections suffer an impact due to the project that is deemed "significant" by VTA's CMP guidelines. 2. NB Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road and Vallco Parkway and Wolfe Road degrade to LOS E under Cumulative + Project conditions. Vallco Parkway and Wolfe Road can be improved to LOS D under Cumulative + Project conditions with the addition of an additional right turn movement from WB Vallco Parkway to NB Wolfe Road. The Calabazas Place project will be conditioned by the City to undertake that improvement, but this project maybe required to make a contribution to that· improvement. The unsignalized intersection ofNB Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road is also estimated by the analysis to degrade to LOS E under Cumulative + Project conditions. No mitigation of the degradation of LOS ofNB Wolfe Road and L~''77 Perimeter Road intersection is recommended by the traffic study. However, the City will ask that the traffic study be amended to include suggestions for mitigations that would serve to improve the intersection LOS; and the project will be conditioned to undertake or contribute to the mitigation, if any, recommended to improve the LOS of the intersection to an acceptable level. 3. The project should be conditioned to undertake the recommendations of the traffic study regarding bicycle parking/access and connection to the adjacent neighborhoods. Specifically, a pedestrian and bicycle connection shall be provided to the residential neighborhood to the west of the project. In addition, a pedestrian connection to Wolfe Road to provide access to the sidewalks and bus stops on Wolfe Road shall be provided. 4. Stop signs shall be provided at the driveway intersection with Perimeter Road. 5. The project will be required to make improvements to correct operational deficiencies at the traffic signal at the intersection of Wolf Road and the I-280 southbound offramp. These improvements include providing pedestrian countdown signal heads and installing or upgrading emergency vehicle preempt (EVP) equipment. Copy to: Traffic Engineering 4-7~' CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 14, 2005 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on December 14, 2005. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: U-2005-16, TR-2005-04, Z-2005-05 DA-2005-01, ASA-2005-11 (EA-2005-10) Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road Applicant: Location: DISCRETIONARY ACTION REOUEST Use Permit to construct a 156 unit, two-story attached condominium development South of I-280 and West of Wolfe Road Tree removal and replanting to construct a 156 unit, two-story attached condominium development South of I-280 and West of Wolfe Road Rezoning of a 5.19 acre parcel from Planned Development (Regional Shopping) to a Planned Development (Regional Shopping/Residential) Modification to a Development Agreement (1-DA-90) to encompass the development proposed in U-2005-16, ASA-2005-11, Z-2005-08 and TR-2005-04 Architectural and Site Approval for a 156 unit, two-story attached condominium development South of I-280 and West of Wolfe Road FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts. Lf-79 / s / Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g/ erc/REC EA-2005-10 [/- - \?t) £& CITY OF CUPEIQINO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 .,' '" ,,:"T: ,",.,'" '_cgom~un.it1:,8~V,~I'?£rg~_~t78;Ea.~~ent INITIAL STUDY .. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST . . ~,,_.... -.".,"....'-.... -...,.- ,;,_";,~' ;",.~,'_,,,.._... ......;._, .;'__do.:,,'_";"':'~ "....".;.,.;,-.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Staff Use Only EA File NO.EA-2005-10 Case File No. U-2005-16; ASA-2005-11; 2:-2005-05; TR-2005-04; DA-2005-01 I\ttachments: Arborist, Traffic, Noise, Air Quality, School Impact Reports Project Title: Condominiums at Vallco Project Location: 10123 N. Wolfe Road Project Description: The project consists of a 156 unit condominium complex consistinq of five buildinqs and a podium parkinq qaraqe. The two-storv buildinqs will be comprised of two-storv. three-bedroom units. The three-storv buildinqs will consist of one- and two-bedroom units. Additionallv. there will be a recreational buildinq surrounded bv common area at the southeast corner of the site and a landscaped pedestrian paseo alonq the western perimeter of the site. The pedestrian paseo will also serve as an ernerqenCV vehicle access (EVA) lane. Environmental Setting: The project site is currentlv developed as a surface parkinq lot that serves as additional parkinq for the Vallco shoppinq mall. The site is surrounded bv Hiqhwav 280 to the north. Perimeter Road and Macv's department store to the south. N. Wolfe Road to the east and a sinqle-familv residential neiqhborhood to the west. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) - 4.37 acres Proposed Bldg. - 192.900 Commercial/Residential Assessor's Parcel No. -316-20-057 and 316-20-064 Building Coverage - 130.700 (57%) Exist. Building - NA sJ. Zone - P (Reqlonal Shopplnq) G.P. Designation - If Residential, Units/Gross Acre . 5.19 acres Unit Type #1 Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price 20 Own 1 13,500 sJ. NA 1675 sJ. each) 108 Own 2 102,600 sJ. NA 1950 s.t. each) 28 Own 3 43,400 sJ. NA 11550 s.f. each) Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) o Monta Vista Design Guidelines o S. De Anza Conceptual o N. De Anza Conceptual o S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual x Heart ot the City Specific Plan o Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - NA FAR - .85 Max. Employees/Shift - NA Parking Required - 312 spaces Parking Provided - 319 spaces Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - YES X NO 0 q -81 il.J·- INITIAL STUDY SOURCE LIST A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1. Land Use Element 2. Public Safety Element 3. Housing Element 4. Transportation Eiement 5. Environmental Resources 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgeline Policy 10. Constraint Maps B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. City Aeriai Photography Maps 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geological Report (site specific) 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance 18b City of Cupertino Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Plan C. CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Deveiopment Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupertino Water Utility D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Pianning Departments 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. Fremont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 33. County Sheriff 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District 36b Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program 36c San Jose Water Company E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site 43b National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Discharge Permit Issued to the City of Cupertino by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 43c Hydromodiflcation Plan F. OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience w/project of similar scope/characteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series A. Complete.ill! information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. lEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on eac~ paqe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. ,(Project Plan Set of Legislative Document ,(Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) BE SURE YOUR INITIAL STUDY SUBMITTAL IS COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE MATERIALS MAY CAUSE PROCESSING DELAY L¡_Ç't- EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: c ~~.. C" 0 C" _ C ea c: C .- C -1U" IU 0 .. lUlU" .. i ISSUES: .!!:! (,,) (,,) .co,c:¡:;E ..c: " " " ...- ~ 1-¡¡::~IUO I- .- IU o IU I [and Supporting Information Sources] C~ 1J·-¡:ClOo en :t: a. zOo a> C E U)C :¡:¡:'- IJ C E E õ.~- a> CI .- 0 a> .~- Q.!/ ..J'- :E" ..J!/ , !/ C , - í , i I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: i : a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a 0 0 0 ŒJ I scenic vista? [5.9,24,41,44] , i b) Substantially damage scenic resources, 0 0 0 ŒJ i including, but not limited to, trees, rock I outcrop pings, and historic buildings within a ¡ state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] , i c) Substantially degrade the existing visual 0 ŒJ 0 0 I I character or quality of the site and its I I surroundings? [1,17,19,44] d) Create a new source of substantial light or 0 0 ŒJ 0 i glare, which would adversely affect day or I nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44] ! Items a and b - No Impact I There are no scenic vistas or scenic resources on the project site; therefore, the proposed project will have no ! adverse effects on scenic vistas or scenic resources. I Item c - Less Than Sianificant with Mitiaation I The project site is currently developed as a surface parking lot surrounded by several mature trees that serve to I visually screen the site from the adjacent residential neighborhood to the west and Interstate 280 to the north , and east. These existing trees provide visual character and quality to the site. The project is proposing to I remove several existing trees on site to accommodate the proposed residential condominium development; I I however, the majority of the trees along the perimeter of the site are proposed to be retained. These trees are primarily mature coast redwood trees. A mitigation measure will be added as a conditian of approval to retain the existing 25-foot wide iandscape planter, including existing trees, along the western property line. Additionally, mitigation measures will be incorporated requiring additional trees to be planted on site to provide additional screening of the site and to replace trees previously removed on site: these will be addressed in Section IV (Biological Resources) of the Initial Study. Item d - Less Than Sianificant The proposed project will create a new source of light within the surrounding neighborhood: however, it is not anticipated that the lighting levels of the residential development will adversely affect day or nighttime views in I the area. The lighting levels of the project should be consistent with the lighting levels of other multi-family i residential developments within the surrounding area. A mitigation measure will be added as a condition of I approval to ensure that any lighting fixtures facing residences, existing or new, be shielded to mitigate the I i effects of lighting glare onto surrounding residences. I Lf -f3 ~----_. "'---'-~'----'--'-------I----- ,.-----~- --~-- ----- --, i s::: , , >..... s:::.... 0 s:::.... , , - s::: '" s::: s::: .- s::: , ; -"'.... '" 0.... "''''.... .... ! i ISSUES: .!!! 0 0 r=o~:+:E '<:00 0 .... ¡¡: ~ tt=:::"'O 1-,- '" o '" s::: ._ U) ~ c. zc. I [and Supporting Information Sources] 'sS:::E U)'- == tnc. ! U) c :+: '- U) s::: E E o.~- ( tn .- 0 CD .~- ..J'- :æE 0 ! c..rn rn s::: ..Jrn ; ! ! , i II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In i I ! determining whether impacts to agricultural ¡ i resources are significant environmental i ! ! effects. lead agencies may refer to the I I California Agricultural Land Evaluation and I I ! Site Assessrnent Model (1997) prepared by , , I the California Dept. of Conservation as an I I I optional model to use in assessing impacts I i on agriculture and farmland. Would the ! I project: i , I I , I a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique 0 0 0 I!iI , ! i Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide I I Importance (Farmland), as shown on the ! , I maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland ! Mapping and Monitoring Program of the I ! California Resources Agency, to non- I i agricultural use? [5,7,39] \ b) Conflict with existing zoning for 0 0 i 0 I!iI I agricultural use, or a Williamson Act I I contract? [5,7,23] I c) Involve other changes in the existing 0 0 0 I!iI i I I environment which, due to their location or I nature, could result in conversion of I Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] I I i I I I - , Items a throuoh c No Imoact I The project site is located within a developed urbanized area and has no agricultural land or resources: I therefore, the proposed project will not impact agricultural land or resources. \111. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the i significance criteria established by the I applicable air quality management or air I pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would , the project: ' I' a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality pl.an? [5,37,42,44] b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] o o o o _D_ _--",J , I ! I i I!iI I ! i I 0 I I , I , J y --~~ Lf ~--------_.._---- ____.__n_____·____ --.-~---~~-_._.- ,-------~--------- - ---.". , ; " >,.... ; ë c.Q ,,- - " " -"'.... '" 0.... "''''.... .... ; ISSUES: .~ u u ¡::u..c~E ..c: () () () .....- ~ ¡¡::;t::Cl:So I- .- '" 0 '" I [and Supporting Information Sources] c:t: CI)'- 3: O)Q. U):-!:: 0- Z Q. a> " E C/JC ~'- CI) " E E õ.~- a> 0) .- 0 a> 0)_ , Q..(J) ..J(ij :æ;() ..J(J) " í I i c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net 0 0 0 ŒJ I increase of any criteria pollutant for which I the project region is non-attainment under an i applicable federal or state ambient air quality i standard (including releasing emissions í which exceed quantitative thresholds for 1 ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] I d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial , 0 0 ŒJ 0 I ! pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] ì I e) Create objectionable odors affecting a 0 0 ŒJ 0 I substantial number of people? [4,37,44] i Items b, d and e -Less Than Siqnificant , ! The proposed project IS below the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) screening thresholds I for projects with potentially significant emissions. Therefore, a study of air quality impacts to be generated from I the project was not conducted. However, an air quality impact report was prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin to I assess the impacts and exposure of air pollution emissions from Interstate 280 traffic onto the proposed project. I , Additionally, the report assessed the impact of construction activities to air quality that will result from the I proposed project. I I Under the BAAQMD CEQA (Califomia Environmental Quality Act) Guideiines, the report found that exposure of ' diesel particulate matter (DPM) and carbon monoxide (CO) from 1-280 traffic onto the proposed residential I project would be considered a less than significant impact. Therefore, the potential for violation of any air I quality standard, exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and creation of I' objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people are iess than significant. Further, no mitigation 'I measures pertaining to DPM and CO have been recommended. However, mitigation measures for construction activity impacts have been recommended by the air quality study and will be added as conditions of approval for I I the roject These are construction activity mitigation measures that are typ'cally red t d I t I I: p . I appl 0 eve opmen j ¡ oroiects within the Cllv. I I I IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: I I I , ! I a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either 0 0 0 ŒJ ! I directly or through habitat modifications, on I I any species identified as a candidate, ! , sensitive, or special status species in local or , , i regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by I I the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? I I [5,10,27,44] i , ! ; I ¡b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any 0 0 0 ŒJ I I riparian habitat or other sensitive natural . i , community identified in local or regional I ! plans, policies, regulations or by the I i I California Department of Fish and Game or I I US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] ! , -- -- , ~-, - --~~ LJ ~fS- i~SS~E~· -------~ ;~~ l [and Supporting Information Sources] a¡ ~ E ; õ.~- 0.. en , ---~--~---"------I c.... a c:o ...... í c::;:.- c: c ' !2 co ",1::: C'a CO""" ...... I -oC)~ J::otJ 0 i J-~;o 1--;:t'U oct! I' IJ)'-'-a. ",._a. za. ",t::E... IJ)t:E E .3'~.c0 ().~- en~g ..Jen ::- I f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted I Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural I Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat i conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] I Items a throuah d. and f No Imoae! i The project site is developed as a parking lot and will not have a substantiai adverse effect on threatened or I endangered biological resources. ! Item e Less Than Sianificant with Mitiaation: Iln August of 2005, a tree sUlVey was conducted on the project site by Barrie D. Coate and Associates at which ! time a total of 265 trees were found on site. There are no "Heritage" or "Specimen" trees on site as defined by I the City's Heritage and Specimen Trees Ordinance; however, the ordinance does require the protection of trees that were approved as part of a previous site approval. Based upon this requirement, all of the existing trees on I the projee! site are to be protected, unless a tree removal permit is obtained. Of the total number of trees on ; site, there are 186 coast redwoods that comprise approximately 70% of the trees on site. The redwood trees I are primarily located along the perimeter of the site. There are also a number of trees of other varieties. , including Italian stone pines. in landscape islands within the existing parking lot. Several of the trees are I showing drought stress as it appears that the irrigation system in this area has been shut off or is non- ! functional. I 'I The proposed project will require removal of several trees on site to accommodate the condominium II , development: however, a majority of the existing redwood trees along the perimeter of the site are proposed to I be maintained. The applicant removed several trees on site in October of 2005 to accommodate story pole , equipment to demonstrate the building height of the proposed condominium complex. Many of these trees i were already slated to be removed in conjunction with the development. However. some of the trees removed I included the redwood trees along the western perimeter of the site that could possibly have been retained. ! Further. the applicant did not obtain approval of a tree removal permit for removal of these trees. I A mitigation measure will be added as a condition of approval to retain the existing 25-foot wide landscape I planter, including existing trees, along the western property line. Additionally, mitigation measures will be I incorporated requiring an additional row of trees to be planted within this landscape planter along the western I perimeter of the property to establish a double row of trees for screening. Further, the applicant will be required i to provide infill trees and meet a tree replacement ratio of two new trees for each one that has been removed i without a Tree Removal Permit. Measures will also be included for the protection of trees to be retained on site. I These protection measures include protective fencing, construction methods to protect the drip line areas I around trees to be retained and irrigation requirements. i c) Have a substantial adverse effect on i federally protected wetlands as defined by i Section 404 of the Clean Water Act I (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal i pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, I filling, hydrological interruption, or other I means? [20,36,44] ! i d) Interfere substantially with the movement I of any native resident or migratory fish or I wildlife species or with established native , I resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or I impede the use of native wildlife nursery , sites? [5,10,12.21,26] Ie) Conflict with any local policies or i ordinances protecting biological resources, II such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,12,41] o o o ŒJ o o o ŒJ i ! I I o ŒJ o o o o o ŒJ ¿! - r-0 . ì c 1 ~.- I C'- 0 c'- _C ra!: c: .- C ñiea:.... '" 0'- "'",.- .... ISSUES: .- u ~ "cu.c:.;::¡E ..c u u u .- .- I-¡,¡:::t=;:cuo 1-,- '" o '" c~ (/) ~ c. zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] '" C E ""-;=c>c. .- C> ' IJ)C ;;~ '" C E E 0._ - '" C> .- 0 '" .2'- a..cn ..Jiij :iEu ..Jcn C - i V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the I , i project: , ; i , I , ŒJ i a) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 i the significance of a historical resource as I i defined in §15064.5? [5,13.41] i I I I \ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 ŒJ i the significance of an archaeological +-0 I i resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13.41] , I I c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique 0 0 ŒJ I : paleontological resource or site or unique I I geologic feature? [5,13.41] I I d) Disturb any human remains, including 0 0 0 ŒJ ! those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 1[1,5] ! Items a throuah d - No ImDact II The project site is currently developed as a surface parking lot. The site is not within a sensitive archaeological I area of the City and has no historical resources n site 0 I ! VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the I project: , a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as 0 0 0 ŒJ i I delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo í Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the I State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? , Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 ŒJ [2,5,10.44] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including 0 0 0 ŒJ liquefaction? [2,5,10,39.44] , iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39.44] 0 0 0 ŒJ I I b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the 0 0 I 0 ŒJ I 1 loss of topsoil? [2,5,10.44] , I ! 4-2'7 ~----_.._-_.__. -~._~-----_._----,-~ s::: , , >o- s::: - 0 s:::- , -s::: ra C s::: .- ns;...., -",- '" 0- - i ISSUES: .~ u u .cu.c:,¡:¡r:! ..c:uu u -.- ª 1-t¡:::::CI:IO 1-.- '" o '" c~ II)·-;=Clc. (IJ ~ a. zc. í [and Supporting Information Sources] () s::: E I/) C :,¡:¡ "- II) s::: E .§ i õ.~- () CI .- 0 ().!2'- c..cn ....I(ñ :¡;u ....Icn s::: , , I I c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is D D ŒI D , ; unstable, or that would become unstable as ! a result of the project, and potentially result i in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, i subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? I [2,5,10,39] í , ! d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined D D ŒI D i I I in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code i I (1997), creating substantial risks to life or i I ! property? [2,5,10] , I , ! e) Have soils incapable of adequately D D D ŒI I supporting the use of septic tanks or I alternative waste water disposal systems , I where sewers are not available for the I disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39] I Items a and e - No Impact I The proposed project is not anticipated to expose people or structures to rupture of a known I earthquake fault, seismic ground shaking, or landslides. Additionally, the project site is not known to have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water I disposal systems. I Items b. c and d - Less Than Sianificant I According to the Geologic and Seismic Hazards Map of the Cupertino General Plan, the project site is located in a VF, Valley Floor, zone. The VF zone includes all relatively level valley floor terrain with relatively iow levels of geologic hazard risk. The project will involve excavation for the construction I of an underground podium parking garage for the residential condominium complex and, as a result, I there will be some loss of soil as a result of the proposed project. However, per the General Plan, I the project will be required to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and will require a soils report and a detailed soils/structural evaluation to certify adequacy of normal UBC earthquake regulations with recommendations for more stringent measures if required. Therefore, the risk that the project will expose people or structures to a geologic unit or soil that is unstable is I less than significant. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: I a) Create a significant hazard to the public or D D D ŒI I the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or D D D ŒI I the environment through reasonably . ! foreseeable upset and accident conditions ! involving the release of hazardous materials I I into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] , i , Ll--ff' ~._-----_._~-_._._---~--~-~--_._--~--- ~---r--- -----r------1 '" '" ;.,- I: 1:.2 0 ",- - '" n:s ....- '" i ISSUES: -"'- ..I:C'lJCU1ü "'",- - i .!!:! U U l--uO),- ..c:UU U I -.- ~ I- .- '" o '" l [and Supporting Information Sources] c~ t¡;::.¡:;o en :t: Co zc. () '" E "'--.- c. ; "'''':!:.... '" '" E E I · õ.~- () C> 0 ().~- ..J'- ..c: . [l.rn rn_u ..Jrn , , -- '" i ~- I c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle 0 0 0 ŒJ i I ¡ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, \ substances, or waste within one-quarter mile I I of an existing or proposed school? i I [2,29,30,40,44] I ! d) Be located on a site which is included on a 0 0 0 ŒJ I i I list of hazardous materials sites compiled I i ! pursuant to Government Code Section i I 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a I I I significant hazard to the public or the I i environment? [2,42,40,43] , · I I e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 ŒJ I use plan or, where such a plan has not been I adopted, within two miles of a public airport I I or public use airport, would the project result i in a safety hazard for people residing or I working in the project area? [ ] · I f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 0 0 ŒJ airstrip, would the project result in a safety ¡ hazard for people residing or working in the I project area? [ ] I I g) Impair implementation of or physically 0 0 0 ŒJ interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation I plan? [2,32,33,44] I h) Expose people or structures to a 0 0 0 ŒJ I I significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where I I wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or I where residences are intermixed with I wildlands?[1 ,2,44] ! Items a throuqh h - No Impact i The proposed project site is currently developed as a surface parking lot and has been maintained as such for I I¡ several years. According to the applicant, a Phase I Environmental Assessment has not been prepared for the I project site: it is not anticipated that there will be any evidence of hazardous materials on site. However, a I Phase I Environmental Assessment may be required of the site as part qf the conditions of approval for the I project. The applicant will be required to comply with the findings and recommendations of the Phase I I assessment or Phase II assessment, if required. I I The proposed project as residential condominium deveiopment is not anticipated to generate hazardous waste, ! ] increase the risk of accidental explosion, release hazardous substances, interfere with emergency services, \ i increase exposure of people to hazardous waster or increase fire hazard in areas with flammable bru.sh, grass I or trees. I The project site is not within a two-mile radius of the nearest airport (Moffett Airfield/San Jose Airport) and is not i ¡listed as a contaminated site in the State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. I I ' , I I L_-------.-1 q - r¡;;o¡ ,- I s:: >o- s:: - 0 s::- - s:: cu c c._ ra æ ..... -",- '" 0- - ISSUES: .~ (J 0 ï=uJ:;f! .coo 0 -.- ~ ¡¡::....cao I- .- '" o '" [and Supporting Information Sources] c~ II) .- .- c> II) :t:: a. zc. <I> s:: E II) s:: S: .- e- ll) s:: E E õ.~- mC) :!::o <1>.21- Q.I/) -Iii) :2;0 -II/) s:: i VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY I -- Would the project: I a) Violate any water quality standards or D D D ŒJ l waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] i i I i b) Substantially deplete groundwater D D D ŒJ i ! supplies or interfere substantially with I i groundwater recharge such that there would I be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a , lowering of the local groundwater table level i (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing I nearby wells would drop to a level i which would not support existing land uses i or planned uses for which permits have been I i granted)? [20,36,42] ! c) Create or contribute runoff water which D D ŒJ D I I ! would exceed the capacity of existing or , I i planned stormwater drainage systems or I provide substantial additional sources of I I polluted runoff? [20,36,42] , I d) Otherwise substantially degrade water D D D ŒJ quality? [20,36,37] Ie) Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood D D D ŒJ , hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood I Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate I Map or other flood hazard delineation map? i [2,38] I I f) Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area D D 0 ŒJ I structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] , , ! g) Expose people or structures to a D D D ŒJ ! significant risk of loss, injury or death I involving flooding, including flooding as a I I result of the failure of a levee or dam? I [2,36,38] I , I h) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or D D D ŒJ mudflow? [2,36,38] . C,\ 0 L/_ 7 i ¡ISSUES: i [and Supporting Information Sources] i ----,-- ¡-- - - - -~I----- - - ~~-, c: c: ! ""'--+' __00 __ i .:::=' t: ... c:;:·- ... c : ñšfat) ~cans«; ~caõ ~ ._<.> l-uC)1." U U ~¡¡::"' ¡¡:::;:o 1-¡,¡::n:J ot"a _._ CI)'-'-c. CI).-c. zc. ,¡g"'E CI)"':¡E.... CI)"'E E OCl- Q)CI 0 Q)CI_ .- ...1'-.<: <.> .- 0.. en en,::", ...I en 3=- -------- ._-_._...-._~----'-._._----------'-- , I Items a thouoh d. f throuoh h - No Impact I I The proposed project is not anticipated to violate any water quality standards or water discharge requirements, I i substantially deplete groundwater supplies, degrade water quality, place housing in à 100-year flood zone, or I i expose people or structures to risks involving flooding, or tsunamis.' I , I i Item e - Less Than Sionificant I I The project site is iocated within a B flood zone per the Flood Insurance Rate Map. Community Panel Number! ! 060339-0004-C, dated May 1, 1980. The project site is currently developed as a surface parking lot that is i i relatively flat and primarily paved, with the exception of some landscape islands within the parking lot and i I landscaping along the perimeter of the site. The proposed condominium development will occur primarily on the I I portion of the property that is already paved, and will essentially retain the landscaping areas along the i perimeter of the site. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in a net increase of ! \ impermeable surface on the project site. Construction will also be required to provide additional stormwater ¡ I control measures to reduce run-off in accordance with BAASMA guidelines I , i , I i IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would I I the project: I I a) Physically divide an established 0 0 0 ŒJ I I community? [7,12,22,41] i I b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, 0 0 ŒJ 0 I policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but I not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) I adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ! [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] i c) Conflict with any applicable habitat , 0 0 0 ŒJ i I I conservation plan or natural community , conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] i I Item a and c - No impact i The proposed. development will not physically divide an established community and wili not conflict with any I ""..," ","~, ro"_'_ ,.. · ",wO< romm"", ro__" ",... I i Item b - Less Than'Sionificant il I The proposed project will require a Zoning Map Amendment to amend the existing zoning of the site from i P{Regional Shopping} to P(Residential). The proposed residential project is already consistent with the General I I Plan designation of the site which is Commercial/Residential. Therefore, the proposed Zoning Map Amendment I will provide consistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Map for this project site, and the project will I' I not have significant impacts as a Zoning Map Amendment i I I X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the i I I project: I ! , ; I a) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 ŒJ , , mineral resource that would be of value to . I I the region and the residents of the state? ! i [5,10] ¡ LJ - '1 ( ,-~-------'- ---- -------'---'~____r-~--·---I------- -----·--·---1 , ! c ~- ~ C..... 0 C..... i -c nJ c: C:._ c -ra..... ra 0 ..... rara..... ..... ! ¡ISSUES: .!2 u ~ J:uJ::¡::~ .c (.) (.) (.) , ..... .- 1-tt:::=nJo f- .- ra 0 ra , C~ i [and Supporting Information Sources] () C E II)'-¡:C'>c. ()~ 0.. Z C. ! Cl)C ;1- II) C E E i õ.~- () C'> .- 0 ().~- i I a.m -Ji;; 2 (.) .Jm C , , I b) Result in the loss of availability of a D D D ŒJ ì locally-important mineral resource recovery ! site delineated on a local general plan, í specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] i ! 'I Items a and b - No ImDact No known mineral resources exist on the project site. ! ! I XI. NOISE -- Would the project result in: ; i I a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, D ŒJ D D ! , I noise levels in excess of standards , i , established in the local general plan or noise I I ordinance, or applicable standards of other I ¡agencies? [8,18,44] , , I , i b) Exposure of persons to or generation of D D D ŒJ I i excessive ground borne vibration or ! i ground borne noise levels? [8,18,44] I I , I , i c) A substantial permanent increase in D D ŒJ D , ambient noise levels in the project vicinity I above levels existing without the project? 1[8,18] I I d) A substantial temporary or periodic D D ŒJ D I increase in ambient noise levels in the I project vicinity above levels existing without ! i the project? [8,18,44] I Ie) For a project located within an airport land D D D ŒJ I I use plan or, where such a plan has not been I , adopted, within two miles of a public airport , i or public use airport, would tJle project I I expose people residing or working in the I project area to excessive noise levels? ! [8,18,44] I I f) For a project within the vicinity of a private D D D ŒJ I airstrip, would the project expose people , residing or working in the project area to I i excessive noise levels? [8,18] I L/ - q 2~ ,..-----..-----.---- ---- ~-----~---.-----_..--'--~.- ---,-'- -----T---'----'- Z. 1: ~I -CU.... .~ U ~ -.- .... C~ <1> C E Õ tn_ c..iñ -------,---. C æ ë c.2 cu 0.... ¡::(J~+::~ ~;!::C'Øo II) .- > t:n C. IJ)c;>+::Io. Q)tn '-0 ..Iiñ :2u C C.... ra=_ .c .. u I- .!:! cu IJ) ~ Co II) C E Q) .2'- ..It/) .... u o cu zc. E ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Items b. e and f - No ImDact i The proposed project will not expose people to groundborne vibration or noise and is not located within an I airport land use plan area or private airstrip. I , I I Items a. c and d - Less Than Siqnificant and Less Than Siqnificant with Mitiqation ! , The project site is currently a paved surface parking lot for the Vallco shopping mall. An increase in permanent II ambient noise levels will occur with the development of residential units creating active use of the site, as , opposed to the current use of the site as a parking lot. Additionally, an increase of temporary ambient noise \ levels will occur with construction of the project. This noise generated from the project, however, is considered a I less than significant impact. II The project site is surrounded by Interstate 280 to the north, the Interstate 280 Wolfe Road off-ramp and Wolfe Road to the east, a single-family residential neighborhood to the west and the existing shopping mall to the I south. A noise analysis was prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin dated November 15, 2005 which states that the I predominant noise sources affecting the site are Interstate 280. the Interstate 280 Wolfe Road off-ramp, and Wolfe Road. Noise from the Vallco shopping mall and future associated parking structure would also contribute I to some insignificant noise levels near the southern portion of the site. I The study indicates that exterior ground level noise exposure in the courtyard area is calculated to be 65 dBA in the northern portion of the site between Buildings E and 0 and about 60 dBA between the Buildings A, B, C and F. This is considered a "normally acceptable" noise environment. However, the green space/Emergency Vehicle Access turnaround area at the northern portion of the project site near Interstate 280 is predicted to have a noise level of about 72 dBA. For outdoor use, this would be considered "normally unacceptable." The study indicates that ground level noise in this green space area could be reduced to 65 dBA Ldn or less with I construction of a minimum 8 to 10 foot high sound wall along the property boundaries adjacent to Interstate 280 I and the 1-280 off ramp. Further, it is the intention of this green space area to serve more as a green space, buffer between the freeway and the residential units. The sound wall will be required as a mitigation measure I and will be included as a condition of approval for the project. I Most of the proposed residential units are anticipated to have exterior noise leveis that exceed 60 dBA Ldn; I therefore, the project would be subject to noise control requirements per the State Building Code. This' requirement includes providing each unit with forced air mechanical ventilation systems" For units facing Interstate 280 and the southbound 1-280 Wolfe Road off ramp. additional noise control treatments will be required. The noise study has included mitigation measures to reduce the noise levels to acceptable levels and these will be included as conditions of approval for the project. The study also includes mitigation measures for construction equipment noise that will be in cor orated as conditions of a roval fOT the ro"ect. 4-g3 -----------.------ -~---_._..-------~--.- ---------.----.--.- I c i >-.... æ ê: c .º C.... _ c r:sæ_ ; -"'.... '" 0.... t) , I ISSUES: .!!! () () .co..£::.¡::¡E ..c: () () i .....- ~ .....t;:~rao I- .- '" 0 '" I [and Supporting Information Sources] c:'!:: en·-¡:c>Q. IJ):'!:: Q. Z Q. CI) C E cnC :.¡::¡'- en C E E i ! Õ .2'- CI) C> .- 0 CI).~- I , o..(/ ...Jëi) :2() ...J(/ , C i ! - . , XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would í the project: I I a) Induce substantial population growth in an D D ŒJ D I i area, either directly (for example, by i í ¡ proposing new homes and businesses) or ; I i indirectly (for example, through extension of I I roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] i b) Displace substantial numbers of existing D D D ŒJ I I housing, necessitating the construction of ! I I replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] I c) Displace substantial numbers of people, D D D ŒJ I i necessitating the construction of i replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] I i Item a - Less Than Slamficant I I The proposed 156 unit residential condominium complex will result in population growth within the area. I ! However, development of the site as a residential use is consistent with the General Plan, which included an I I analysis of population and housing in the EIR for the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not. induce substantial population growth or create a demand for housing that would be inconsistent with the ' I General Plan. I I Items band c No Imoact i The project site is currently a surface parking lot; therefore, the project would not displace existing housing and I would not necessitate replacement housing elsewhere. I XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES I a) Would the project result in substantial I I i adverse physical impacts associated with the I I provision of new or physically altered I governmental facilities, need for new or i I physically altered governmental facilities, the , i construction of which could cause significant I I environmental impacts, in order to maintain I acceptable service ratios, response times or I I other performance objectives for any of the I I I public services: , I I Fire protection? [19,32,44] D D ŒJ D , ¡ Police protection? [33,44] D D ŒJ D J , i I ! I i Schools? [29,30,44] D D ŒJ D , , \ Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] D D ŒJ D I r Other public facilities? [19,20,44] D D ŒJ D I i - " L/--- c¡i ----------.----. ---~._--------------_._----- _._~-- ----.-, c: c:.... 0 C't'I £: C._ 10 0.... ¡::(,)..c:;~ ij:~raO VI·->C)c. en £: ;> :.¡::; .... a¡C) '-0 -Iii) 20 c: c:.... c: 1010.... ..c: 0 0 I- .- 10 IJ) ~ Q. VI c: E a¡ .2'- -IC/ .... o o 10 zc. E ! ISSUES: ! [and Supporting Information Sources] ».... -c: -10.... .~ (,) (,) .....- !!' c ~ ~ Q) c: E õ.~- Q.C/ Item a (Fire Protection. Pollee Protection. Schools, Parks and Other Public Facllties) - Less Than Sianificant The project site is currently located within an urbanized area that is served by municipal services, including fire, II police, and public facilities. A residential project of this type and size is not anticipated to create a significant. impact or change in these public services. i ! ; , A schooi impact analysis was conducted by Townhall Services dated November 2005. The student generation I' rates for the condominium development are .19 for Cupertino Unified School District and .10 for Fremont Union High School District. Based on the student generation rates, an enrollment Impact of 39 students is estimated! including 21 students at Collins Elementary, 9 students at Lawson Middie school and 9 students at Cupertino " High. The total per grade enrollment impact is 3.0 students per grade. The faciiities costs per student are anticipated to exceed facilities fee revenue per student at CUSD and FUHSD. The operational costs are, I anticipated to exceed operational revenue at the Impacted CUSD schools by $539. However. at FUHSD, there t I' will be a net benefit of $1 0,199 per student. ! The City has received a letter from FUHSD and CUSD that concurs with the above assumptions made by I I Townhall Services and makes no objections to the project. FUHSD states that the school district is within 2 ! , months of completing a long-range enrollment study and school capacity study which may show that the 1 I cumulative effect of housing projects may push enrollment figures beyond school capacity. However, the letter I states that school enrollment can be mitigated by portable classrooms. The standard for park land per population is 3 acres per population of 1,000 people. Based upon this standard, I there is a deficit of park land area within the proposed project area, Neighborhood M. Per the City's park dedication requirements, the proposed project of 156 residential condominium units with a density of 30 units I per acre would require a park land dedication of approximately .84 acres. The proposed project is not intending I to dedicate land for public park/recreation use. The City recommends that the applicant provide dedicated park area on site of at ieast a half acre along the southeast comer of the site for passive recreational purposes. This would require the removal of some residential units on the project site and bring the park dedication I requirement closer to the half acre area recommended by the City I , XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of D D D ŒJ I existing neighborhood and regional parks or I other recreational facilities such that I ! substantial physical deterioration of the I I facility would occur or be accelerated? I I [5,17,19,21,26,27.44] b) Does the project include recreational D D D ŒJ I , facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5.44] 4 --1'Ç l,s:Es-----m--TÙ~ H:d ~hl o¡· I [and Supporting Information Sources] 2 ~ Ë g¡ ~ ';: g e- g¡ ~ ~ z ~ ! i o.~- Q).~ .- 0 Q).2'- -! ! D. (/ ..J (/ :ïE 0 ..J (/ , , c' , - i litem a - Less Than Sianlficant ¡ i The proposed project is incorporating a 1,600 square foot recreation buiiding for the condominium complex I I surrounded by common open area along the southeast corner of the site and a paved pedestrian paseo along I I the western edge of the site. These are not recreational facilities that are anticipated to create substantial i I physical deterioration of the faciiity to occur or be accelerated. I I i litem b - No ImDact I i The proposed project will not include recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the I ,. t ' I envlronmen . I I ! I I XV. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC-- I I Would the project: i , I i a) Cause an increase in traffic which is 0 0 0 0 I substantial in relation to the existing traffic ¡load and capacity of the street system (i.e., I result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to I , capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at I I intersections)? [4,20,35,44] I b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, 0 0 0 0 I a level of service standard established by the I county congestion management agency for I designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] I c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, I 0 0 0 0 including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in , substantial safety risks? [4,?] ! d) Substantially increase hazards due to a 0 0 0 0 I I design feature (e.g., sharp curves or I I dangerous intersections) or incompatible I I uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] r e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 0 I [2,19,32,33,44] I f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 0 I [17,44] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or 0 0 0 0 I I programs supporting alternative I i transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle I i racks)? [4,34] ! L/ _ c; &> ----.-------------.---- -'----T--------- -..--------- - '-'---, <:: ' >.~ c-::: _0 c:-::: I -o.. rao.. -.-_o.. -CO:'" _ra 0..... ....(0..... .... i .~u(,) -CJ.J::'¡::~ '=oCJ (,) I ~t;:~ i-¡¡:::=:nsO i-tþ:raa. ora i -.-... en·-,.C)a. en'- za., 2 <:: E en <:: ;>:;::... en <:: E E I 0.2'- CI>.2' .- 0 CI> .2'- Il. tI) ...J tI) :;¡; 0 ...J tI) I .: I I ISSUES: i [and Supporting Information Sources] I Items a and b .. Less Than Sionificant ¡ According to the Transportation Impact Analysis report prepared by Fehr and Peers, dated November 2005, the i proposed project as a 156 unit residential condominium complex is estimated to generate 937 new daily trips. I including 74 new AM peak-hour trips and 87 new PM peak hour trips. Ten key intersections were evaluated for i level of service. The intersections of Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway is projected to degrade to LOS E during ¡ the PM peak hour under the cumulative plus project conditions. The unsignalized intersection of Perimeter i Road and Northbound Wolfe Road is projected to worse to LOS E during the PM peak hour under cumulative I plus project conditions. The remaining intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better during both I peak hours. , ¡ The project's contribution at the Wolfe RoadNallco Parkway intersection during PM peak hours is only 1.7 I percent and the existing field observations for the Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road intersection is I ! 50 lower than the calculated delay. Therefore, the projects cumulative impact at these intersections are ¡ considered "Less Than Significant." I To mitigate the LOS E designation for the Northbound Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway intersection, the Public I I Works Department states that an additional right tum movement from westbound Vallco Parkway to Northbound 'I' I Wolfe Road can improve this intersection to LOS D. The Calabazas Place project will be conditioned by the ¡ City to undertake this improvement; however, the proposed project may also be required as a mitigation I measure to make a contribution to this improvement. No mitigation of the degradation of the level of service for II , the unsignalized intersection of Northbound Wolfe Road and Perimeter Road Is recommended. However, the ! City will ask that the traffic study be amended to include suggestions for mitigations that would serve to improve I i this intersection. Further, the project will be conditioned to uJ'ldertake or contribute to mitigation, if any, to ! improve the LOS of this intersection to an acceptabie level. These mitigation measures will be added as conditions of approvai for the project. The study also recommends improvements pertaining to pedestrian and bicycle connections from the surrounding area to the development site and adding stop signs at the driveway intersection with Perimeter I Road. These measures will be added to the conditions of approval for the project. The City's Public Works 1 I Department will also require as a mitigation measure that the project make improvements to correct operational ! deficiencies at the intersection of Wolfe Road and the 1-280 southbound offramp, including countdown signal I i heads and instaliing or upgrading emergency vehicle preempt (EVP) equipment. i , ! Items c. d.e f and 0" No Impact 'I The project will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, substantially increase hazards due to design features, result in inadequate emergency access and/or parking capacity. Additionally, the project will not I conflict with adopted programs supporting alternative transportation. The proposed project will provide a total I of 319 parking spaces which exceeds the required 312 parking spaces for the project. However, the project will i . d 'd t I f 62 b' I rk' 't th C'ty' k' . t be reqUire to provl e a to a 0 ICYc e pa Ing spaces on Sl e per e I spar Ing reqUlremen s. I , , I XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - I , I Would the project: , i a) Exceed wastewater treatment D D D ŒJ I requirements of the applicable Regional , I Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] , D ŒJ I b) Require or result in the construction of D D I new water or wastewater treatment facilities I or expansion of existing facilities, the I construction of which could cause significant I I environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] . i c) Require or result in the construction of I D D D ŒJ I I i new storm water drainage facilities or I I ¡ expansion of existing facilities, the I I construction of which could cause significant , i environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] , ! i Y -C¡l ---------------'-- -- --------------,~--- ----" ! c: i ~- ~ c: - 0 c:- _ c: ns c:: C._ c: i -"'- '" 0- "'",- - , .~ t,) ~ ..cUJ::;r: .c: U U U I ! ISSUES: - .- I-¡¡::~rao I- .- '" o '" ! I [and Supporting Information Sources] c:::t: (/·-:;:Clc. (I) :t: _CL zc. ! Q c: E tl)C ;:L... (/ c: E .§ õ.~- QCI '-0 Q CI_ I i c..l/'J ..Je;¡ 2u ..JI/'J i c: ¡ , I I e) Result in a determination by the , D D D ŒJ i , ! wastewater treatment provider which serves i , or may serve the project that it has adequate I capacity to serve the project's projected i , demand in addition to the provider's existing i commitments? [5,22,28,36.44] I , f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient D D D ŒJ i I permitted capacity to accommodate the I I project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] I I g) Comply with federal, state, and local D D D i ŒJ I I I statutes and regulations related to solid , I i waste? [?] ¡ I Items a throuoh 0 - No Imoact I The project site is served by sanitary sewer service. The applicant, like other users of the system, will be I II required to pay District fees and obtain a permit for construction of the project. A condition of approval will be I incorporated that will require if any necessary improvements are required, these improvements shall be I I completed prior to building occupancy. The project will be required to comply with all federai, state and local I statutes and regulations pertaining related sanitary sewer and solid waste. I i I Lf- 9 t ¡---._--_."---~ -- - - - ---~-- ----- - - -.--.--"..-----..----- .._._-----_.._---~~----~-~---_. ¡- ; ! a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 I ŒJ I degrade the quality of the environment, i substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or I wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining \ levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal I community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered piant or I animal or eliminate important exampies of i the major periods of California history or I prehistory? 0 i b) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 ŒJ 0 I \ individually limited, but cumulatively ! considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental I effects of a project are considerable when , viewed in connection with the effects of past , I projects, the effects of other current projects, I and the effects of probable future projects)? I iO I c) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 ŒJ ! effects which will cause substantial adverse I effects on human beings, either directly or I indirectly? 0 XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by City Staff) PREPARER'S AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature /lâ~,----- , ' Print Preparer's Name jttt/f¡n/L¡;('¡____... '-f -0 c; ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (To be Completed by City Staff) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Aesthetics 0 Agriculture Resources 0 Air Quality 0 Biological Resources 0 Cultural Resources 0 Geology ISoils 0 Hazards & Hazardous 0 Hydrology I Water 0 Land Use / Planning Materials Quality 0 Mineral Resources 0 Noise 0 Population I Housing 0 Public Services 0 Recreation 0 TransportationlTraffic 0 Utilities I Service 0 Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: 0 The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. IRl Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have , been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Staff Evaluator r---~. i - \ , I ' ,.I,~ '-À/ ERèChairperson ~. ~ ) '. .--/. Date j),/IS-/Ù S- Date y - ¡75ð IBARRKIE O. COATE and ASSOCBA TES Horticutural Consultants 23535 Summit Road Los Gatos. CA 95033 408/353-1052 EV ALUA nON OF TREES AT THE V ALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD CUPERTINO Prepared at the request of: Aki Honda City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Prepared by: Michael L. Bench Consulting Arborist August 9th, 2005 Job # 08-05-158 Lf- I'D r EV ALVA nON OF TREES AT THE v ALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROÆCT, 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD. CUPERTINO 1 Assignment I have been asked by Aki Honda, City of Cupertino, to evaluate the trees located at the Val1co Residential Project, 10123, N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino, California. The plan provided for this evaluation is the Tree Removal Plan prepared by Landmark Property Management, Sheet 04, dated 8.08.05. This is an aerial photo showing some but not all tree locations. Summary I inspected the trees on this property on August 9th, 2005. 265 trees were surveyed for this report due to their locations in relation to the proposed construction. Of these 265 trees, 9 are located in the public right of way in the exit ramp from the 280 Freeway to Wolfe Road. All of the trees are identified here and given a condition rating. They have been tagged with a numbered alwninum label for field reference. Some trees and/or circumstances concerning them are briefly described here. It appears that there are no "Heritage" or "Specimen" trees, as defined by the City of Cupertino, on this site. Procedures are recorrunended in order to protect the trees that would be preserved. Observations There are 256 trees located on this property and 9 trees located in the exit ramp in the public right of way at Wolfe Road that are included in this tree survey. These 265 specific trees are included because they appear to be potentially exposed to some level of risk by the proposed construction. The attached map shows the estimated locations of all of these trees and their approximate canopy dimensions. The 265 trees are classified as follows: Trees # l-lOl, 108-128, 131_181,216,217,226,227,228, 257,259-265 - Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) Tree # 102 - White Alder (Alnus rhombifolia) Trees # 103, 104, 105, 106, 107,223,224,225 - Shamel ash (Fraxinus uhdei) Trees # 129, 130, 182-192, 194-198,201- 211, 214, 215, 219, 220, 221, 222, 244-249, 256 - Italian stone pine (Pinus pinea) Trees # 193, 199,200,218,250 - Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) Trees # 212, 213, 243 - Tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) Tree # 229 - Italian alder (Alnus cordata) Trees # 230-235, 239, 240, 241, 242, 251-255 - Honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Trees # 236, 237, 238 - Evergreen pear (?yrus kawakami) Tree # 258 - Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 4~/D2~ Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist August 9"', 200S EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE V ALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD. CUPERTINO 2 The particulars about these trees (species, trunk diameter, height, spread, and structure) are included in the attachments that follow this text. The health and structure of each specimen is rated on a scale of 1-5 (Excellent - Extremely poor) on the data sheets attached to this text. Based on these health and structure ratings combined, I have given each tree an overall condition rating as follows: Excellent Good Fair Poor Extremelv Poor Dead Specimens Specimens Specimens Specimens SDecimens Specimens 17,18,24,28, 1,4,5,6,7, 3,11,16,25, 13,31,38,42 12,63,140, 2,10 29,30,34,35, 8,9,14,15, 37,40,41,45, 49,52,57,58, 174,180, 46,48,66,68, 19,20,21,22, 47,50,53,54, 59,60,71,72, 195 74,75,78,82, 23,26,27,32, 55,56,61,62, 138,139,169 84,85,87-92, 33,36,39,43, 70,73,77,79, 94,104-106, 44,51,64,65, 80,81,102,107, 110,111,112, 67,69,76,83, 108,109,131, 115-121,125, 86,93,95,96, 134-137,141, 126,129,130, 97-101,103, 142,145,159, 132,133,158, 113,114,122, 160-164,168, 182,20 I ,203, 123,124,127, 171-173,175, 207,208,223, 128,143,144, 177,179,181, 247,248,249, 146-157,165, ,184-188,190, 258 166,167,170, 193,199,200, 176,178,183, 202,205,206 189,191,192, 215-217,219, 194,196,197, 220,221,225, 198,204,209, 226,229,231, 210-214,218, 236,237,238, 222,224,227, 243,257,259, 228,230,232, 260,261,262, 233-235,239, 264 240-242,244, 245-246,250, 251-256,263, 265 Comments about Specific Trees Of the 265 total trees on site, 186 are coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), which represents 70 % of the total trees, Most of the coast redwood trees are showing symptoms of drought stress. It appears that the irrigation system in this area of the ValIeo complex has been shut off or is non-functional. Examples of trees showing most severe drought stress are Trees # 37 and 71, in which their tops have died, but there are several others with this condition as well, Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arboris! August 9"', 2005 ~ -IDS EV ALUA TION OF TREES AT THE V ALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROÆCT. 10 123 N, WOLFE ROAD. CUPERTINO 3 A sparse canopy is another symptom of drought stress. Trees # 3, 12, 13,31,38, and 140 are good examples, but again there are many others. It would be essential to restore regular irrigation to the coast redwood trees that would be preserved or to provide a temporary irrigation system during construction. A pennanent irrigation system specifically to irrigate the coast redwood trees would have to be included in the design plans if those trees are expected to survive over the long tenn. Several of the coast redwood trees (5. sempervirens) have structural defects that are unrelated to drought stress. Trees # 40, 47, 52,58,77,98, and 114 have competing leaders that are attached at acute angles. This often results in one of the leaders breaking at the point of connection, sometimes followed by the breaking of the other leader at the point of connection a few years later. This risk can be greatly reduced by removing approximately 1/3 of top of one of these two leaders. The majority of the Italian stone pine (Pinus pinea), are in relatively good condition. This is not surprising because this species is well adapted to our Mediterranean climate. Heritage Trees The City of Cupertino (Chapter 14.18 ) " finds that the preservation of specimen and heritage trees on private and public property, and the protection of all trees during construction, is necessary for the best interests of the City and of the citizens and the public thereof." The City "finds it is in the public interest to enact regulations controlling the care and removal of specimen and heritage trees..." A "Heritage Tree" means "any tree or grove of trees which, because offactors, but not limited to, its historic value, unique quality, girth, height or species, has been found by the Architectural and Site Approval Committee to have a special significance to the community." A "Specimen tree" means any of the following: Oak trees; California Buckeye Measurement from Natural Grade 4 Y2 feet Single Trunk Diameter/Circwnference 10 inches (31 inches C) Multi-Trunk Diameter/Circumference 20 inches D (63 inches C) Species Big Leaf Maple; 4 Y2 feet Deodar Cedar; Blue Atlas Cedar 12 inches (38 inches C) 25 inches D (79 inches C) There are no "Heritage" or "Specimen" trees on this property. Risks to Trees by Proposed Construction It appears that all ofthe trees in the interior of the property would be removed. However, the majority of the 265 total trees are located along the perimeter of this site. It appears that many of these could be preserved, providing instant screening for this development. Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist Ll-{OL-( August 9th, 2005 EV ALUA nON OF TREES AT n.¡¡; v ALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROÆCT. 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD. CUPERTINO 4 Trees # 10-84, 129, 130, 182, 185, 186, 187, 190, 191, 192, 194-200,203, and 204 are located within a few feet from the existing curb and paving. The removal of this curb and paving inside the driplines of these trees could adversely damage the root systems of these trees. At the areas within the driplines of those existing trees that would be preserved, it would be essential to remove the curb and paving without significantly disturbing the soil directly beneath, The trees to be preserved at this site would likely be at risk of damage by construction or construction procedures that are common to most construction sites. These procedures may include the dumping or the stockpiling of materials over root systems, may include the trenching across the root zones for utilities or for landscape irrigation, or may include construction traffic across the root system resulting in soil compaction and root die back. If any undèrground utilities are to be replaced or upgraded, it will be essential that the location of trenches be planned prior to construction, and those locations are shown on plans and that the trenches be dug at the locations shown on the plans. Recommendations for Protection of Preserved Trees I. I recommend that the curb and paving within the driplines of the trees to be preserved be removed in the following manner: · Remove the curb and paving by using the bucket of a backhoe or excavator to reach inside the dripline. · Keep the tractor outside the dripline at all times. · Catch an edge of the paving, lift and peel the paving back toward the' tractor. · Immediately following the demolition and removal of paving, the exposed soil must be covered with course wood chips to a minimum depth of 3 inches. · The area must be thoroughly wet down immediately. This area must be kept damp for at least I month. 2. Trees planned for preservation must be irrigated throughout the entire construction period during the dry months (any month receiving less than linch of rainfall). Irrigate a minimum of 10 gallons for each inch of trunk diameter every two weeks. A soaker hose or a drip line is preferred for this purpose. 3. I recommend that protective fencing be provided during the construction period to protect those trees that are planned to be preserved. This fencing must protect a sufficient portion of the root zone to be effective. In most cases, it would be essential to locate the fencing a minimum radius distance of 10 times the trunk diameter in all directions from the trunk. For example, a tree with a trunk diameter of 15 inches dbh (Diameter at Breast Height = 54 inches above grade) would require that protective fencing be erected 13 feet minimum from the trunk. Prepared by: Michael L. Bench. Consulting Arborist August 9''', 2005 i ~ { D 5 EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE V ALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, 10123 N. WOLFE ROAD. CUPERTINO 5 Ifhardscape (i.e., curbing, paving, etc.) exists inside this 13 foot radius, the protective is usually recommended to be erected at the edge of the hardscape feature and be located at least 13 feet from the trunk minimwn on all other sides. Occasionally it may be essential to have a certified arborist make decisions about the location(s) of protective fencing at the project site. I recommend that protective fencing must: · Consist of chain link fencing and having a minimwn height of 6 feet. · Be mounted on steel posts driven approximately 2 feet into the soil. · Fencing posts must be located a maximum of 10 feet on center. · Protective fencing must be installed prior to the arrival of materials, vehicles, or equipment. · Protective fencing must not be moved, even temporarily, and must remain in place until all construction is completed. 4. There must be no grading, trenching, or surface scraping inside the driplines of protected trees, unless specifically described in another section of this report. 5. Trenches for any utilities (gas, electricity, water, phone, TV cable, etc.) must be located outside the driplines of protected trees, unless approved by a certified arborist. 6. If any old irrigation lines, drain lines, sewer lines, or any other underground features exist inside the driplines of protected trees, but would not be used, I recommend that they be cut off approximately at soil grade and left in the ground. 7. Materials must not be stored, stockpiled, dumped, or buried inside the driplines of protected trees. 8. Excavated soil must not be piled or dumped, even temporarily, inside the driplines of protected trees, 9. Any pruning must be done by an arborist certified by the ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) and according to IS A, Western Chapter Standards, 1998. 10. Any pathways or other hardscape inside the driplines of protected trees must be constructed completely on top of the existing soil grade without excavation. Fill soil may be added to the edge of finished hardscape for a maximum distance of approximately 2 feet from the edges to integrate the new hardscape to the natura] grade, II. The sprinkler irrigation must not be designed to strike the trunks of trees. Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist August 9''', 2005 Lf -I 0 ~ EVALUATION OF TREES AT THE VALLCO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT. 10123 N, WOLFE ROAD, CUPERTINO 6 12. Landscape irrigation trenches must be a minimum distance of 10 times the trunk diameter from the trunks of protected trees. 13. Landscape materials (cobbles, decorative bark, stones, fencing, etc.) must not be installed directly in contact with the bark of trees because of the risk of serious disease infection. Respectfu~y s~' ~ ,,-w- -- - Michael L. Bench, Associate ~J}.~ Barrie D. Coate, Principal MLB/sh Enclosures: Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Map Tree Charts Pages 1 - 27 Prepared by: Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist August 9"', 200S y~ { D 1 Recommend I , : , , , , , , , , , : : : ........ ' : ,- 9 ! :-IIC? .-- I c:(: or- - : 1>:- M ' : o· > ",. --.:n./I-==:t: ill « 1.0 I L...L...: 0::: I,.., ('-. W W ,'W,UJ'I.L- ill S2 'S! ~: "! Q w g: o O:::'~:CIO:: a::: a:: w!¡:::z:a.. -- @ :) ~:cr::w:..J W I- -.J >:~::E:<C (9 0 o >. ::E::> <:( ill Ü U):(I):O:O I- l- I- O:O:o:::iE ii 0 o w:w'w:w w cr: o W:~:o:::o:: I 0... O:::~I , , , ---t- , , Status , 0 o , , 0 ---t---1----1 , , , , PesUDisease Problems " I I " 1 I I I I , I I I 1 : Lõ: :.-.: , '1 ,1.01 ,'''-, 1" I_I 1""-' I I ,......., : w: : 0: I (j), I W' : « : : a::: :W: G)I W: :~: lñ: ': >: '0' . IS' o. _I : S: >- : 0: ,~, ~' ,........1 0::, ...~ I 10'......... I I I I 0 I «I ~'O 0 W' .-J' -: 0 : -.J: (/)10::: > O. 0' t--! ü > ~¡ 0: Üw'W 0 z. }-I (f):W «~: 0: z10::: W 0::: 0: _\ J-- 0 1-: cc: , ,0 , " , " ____.~____L___~___~______L_.__ I I I , I I I I I . I I I I I I , I I , I I I , I I I I , I ____~___~____L___~____L___ I I I I I I I I , I , I I I , Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs I , , I " I I I , I I I " I I I I I I I' I I I I , I I' I ,I' 1 I , I I' I" I , I I I I I' I ' I , I I I ,I I I : : ::: &:::: .-.. 1-: : ':: -r;-I__: :z: Ir{ w:: : 1 N:N: :0 :1- T""" uJ 1 I I I 0 -I T"" I 1 _ 1 I - ~:: ¡~ O:uJ ~:~~::I-:~ # r N:: : uJ: I- __I Z: -- : <.9: « : ~- I- ~I 1 ,LLuJ I-I~ ~I~(n ZIZI~ ~I 101~ I I 1 I........ ,I 1.--1'-" -I _ 1 I 1 L-L- ~ 1:2: 1 1 c::( I ~ 1 ..- 1 « 1 z Z 1 Z 1 0 Z I 1 1 IJJ I 0 :: :N ~I_ :~I~:_ «: :~ -:0:01- @)I~ 1 I A\ ¡::: I- ú)1 W u- 1 ~ Wi Z 1 (/) (/), Z 1 W 1 ~ ¡.-- : : ~ (/) 1: IX Z: « .....I: I : W 4: I : W : Q.. æl(/)1 'æ (/)w W T""1~ OIIX O'~'IX ælWlzl W:>-:: -: -' -: :: : w: I c.9 ~ o(f) , ,w ~ 0 :r:, I- 1-' 0 ~'~'~ ~' > ' (f) , Z '--111 II-'--.A' L-IO _I~ I I I IW' W I~ I I W :r: ~w ~,~ 01 L-L- I I 1 0, 'z- '2: r.-- 1 I <.9 .....I 1 -' I « 1 1 I 1.....1 I «:.....I:II:~ _ IX «:~ ZIN 0:0:0 o:~:ro:~ _:~:m:ro:« w ~ w:1- 0:« cr:æ:oc æ:w:<e:oc 0:'2::0:0:0 I (/) I:(/) ü:I ü:ü:O ü:OC:U:~ - 1 I 1 I I 1 19: : : : : 50 25 : -~--~.-~-~-~----~---~---~--- ---~ I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I , 0 0 2: 1: : __~_~__~~___~L___ , , , , 0 0 , , , BARRIE D, COATE and ASSOCIA US 1'00)353·1052 21m Summil Road lœGaios,CA 95030 Plant Name ~ Tree # , 0 , , , 0 , , , ~--r--T---r---I , , 0 , , , , 0 , , , , ---+---+---1----1 , 0 , , , 0 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I _____~-~--~---~---~------r---- I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I ' I 1 I I I _.___~__~_L___~___~______L___~ 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I ___~----r---~--~-r---~---~--- 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I , I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I ___l____L___j_~__l___J____l___ I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I -'- g! ! ! ! ! dead i ! ! ____~--_r---~----~---_r---r--- --~-r--~~----~-~- I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 141..J:12: : :35:253:2: : ____L__~___~____~___~___~___ _.~_~___~____L___ I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 'I I I I I I 1 1 1 ---_!_---.ç;-~?_~~~?~~-~~~--------------- SeqLJoia sempervirens Coast Redwood --------------------------------- Coast Redwood ---------~----------------------- 2 ---~----- 3 --------- , , , , , , , , , ---~----~---~~-- , , , o , , , , , , , , , 0 , , , , ---t-~--t_---.¡--·-I , , , , , , -'- L o 0 , , , 0 o , , ---1---1---,---1 , , , , 0 , , , , ---t---~---i---- , , , , 0 0 , , , , , , 1 I" 1 ---+----....---..--~-I o , , , , 0 , , , 1 i I , , , ---t----~---i---- , , , , , , , 0 , , , , , , , _.-+-~-........---..-__-I , , , , 0 , , , , I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I _____~----r---_r---~------r----' I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 _____~----t---~---i------t---- I I I 1 I : I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 ___~_~----r·--_r---9------r----' 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I r I I I I I _____~----t---~---t------t---- 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 , 1 1 1 , I I' I 1 , I I I _____~----r---_r---+------r---- I I 1 I J I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 -----~----t---~---~-----~~---- 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I ~ : 1 I : I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I' ' ----~~---~~---~---+------~---- I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I ___+----r---~----r---~----9--- I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 ---t----r---~----t---~----t--- I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 2: 2! ! ___r--~~----r~-· , , , , , , , , , 1 ¡ 3: ! ----t---~----t--- , 0 , , , , L L L 22! ¡ : : : 60130 ____~--_r---~----..---_r---r--- 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 , 1 12:..J:11: : :40:20 ----t--_t·--~----i---_t---r--- I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- Coast Redwood -~------------------------------- 4 --------- 5 --------- I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 ___..----r---..----r---~----+--- I I I 1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I , I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I ---j----~---i----~---~----I--- . I I I I I I I I 1 I I L 2: 1! ! ~___r---~----+~-- , , , , , , , , , , 0 , 2 : 1: : ----f---~----I--- , , , , , , 6! : ¡ : ¡ 40: 15 ____9~-~---~----1---_r---r--- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 18:: : : :65130 ____I--~---~----i---~---f--- I I I I , I I I 1 1 I I Coast Redwood --------------------------------- Coast Redwood ~-----------~---------------~---- 6 --------- 7 --------- I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I ___.____~---..----~~--~----r-·- 1 I I I . I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ' , , _'!.~_l--JL---J----l---JL?~l~-q _~_L_~_J----i--~ I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 ¡ I 1 I I 1 I I 1 . I I ---j----f---i----f---~----I--- I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ! ! ! ! ! t I I I I i I I I I 12: : : J : 35: 151 2 : 1: : ____j___f___i____j____f___I--- ----f---~----I--- I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I' I 1 I .L 8 Coast Redwood ---------~~-------------------------~---_.- I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I . I ---+----~---..----~---~_.-~--- I I I I , I I I I 1 I I I , I I I I 1 I I . I I I I 18: : : : : dead : : : ----~--~---~----..--~~---~-~-r--~~---~----~-~- I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- ___!~___,Ç;_~?_~~~?~~_~~_C!_______________ 9 --------- 5 = Worst 1 = Best 1 0123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Vallco Residential Project, 2005 Job Name: Job #: 08-05-158 n:::\tA· AUGust 9th -c , - c:> ~ Measurements Condition Pruning/Cab ing Needs Pest/Disease Problems Recommend Status : : :: : ::: ¡:: ': 1 : : ~: ::: I I I I , I I I I I I , I I I I 'I I , I I I I I I '" I ,_, ", , I : : :: : ::: :::: : 1.0 : : : -.: : : : :: : :: _: :::: 1 ~: : : W( l'-': - I , I I ,10, I' I I I _I , I ...-, u;> I -'.., ]--' I " I I 1,.....1 I I I I I..() I I I I -I I ~ wI: :: : :: ':- : 12: 1-: I :UlI:: 0: : ct ~ BARRIE D COATE w"" , " ~, N , '0' I ' ~ , (f) , , , w' w ' >- , : : : :1-- :0 : : I'"";" : :-1 -- :<C::: eel (J) : 0:>- LL I I I I W 0 I W ' I C) l...r rF"l' I I- I (9 =1:1: >- I W I I --- I w, « .-. I I'V' -==.- {', d ASSOCIATES N"" W' ., z' ~ ~'CJ' «, - I-- ' (f)' -' "" 'w ",' ~ ~ - w an _: : : : WI-: ~ : G): -: (9 z: z a:::: (9 ~ 0 oc : -: U"): : 6: U) ': W W 0:: ('-0 W . ') ~: : : : LL «:...::: : ~: 1--: Z z: - 0: z :> w : 0: ;.: s: : - S¡ ~ 0:: 0 W a::: \4(0)353-105... ....q ,:2: I I 'N:2. I":::: I _, <C I _ <{' Z I- I _ Or 0 0 _, I _I >- I Ü lOa::: I ....J I ;::;:; W I- o :W: : L _: F= -: : a:::: I-- : Z : (/): ill - lO: : : «: 0:::: 0::: W: -: 0 ... 0:: ~ 135355umm¡lRGad@)'-'II(§)-1 (f) 1.0 I ~ . Z' « W-,' _I (f)W' -« ,z W (La::: , I ~ I 00 ' Ü' :s' :s I-- I I- I Z a.. I-- 0 '(f)' , , (f) I ' I u- I J I I I W ...... I I I I 10::1 l05CalosCA95030 0:::' I I '0::: W'W "r"1......'010::: 0'1- 0::::'0:::' Z -'O'O'W'.-J'.-J ~IW'W..l ill W , ill :>- : :: : -: ~ : _ : : :: W I (9 (/) : a::: : : 0: : >::::2: c;t ~ I-- ,(f) , , ,WI-- 1--, 0 I' I- I I- ,0 ~' ~ ~' ~ '> (f), Z 1--, Ü 1 > I .../ I 0 I 0 > I u.. '-== > CJ Ü '" I' ,« '0'-'''''''' I I W' ">'~I 0' 0 I ,.::= « W ,_ 1 , 'w I' WI-, ......' 0 I u..., " 0 'z- 0 ' '0 ' Z ' , (f) , (/) '0 0 I-- W I~ 1 ,r , ~ I ~ ' I « I 'I --' , , WI' , t- 1 t- 0' 0' I-- ~:~: I:I:~ ~:a::: ~:a::::Z:N 0:0 0:O:21ro1~ W:W:~¡~: 0: 0 : :U ~ - ~,~, ro'm'~ W'(L W'I--'O'« O:::lrY rY'O:::IWI~lrY (/)IrYIWlrY1 0, 0 W,WIW W OC 0 PI N -11 I 1-' II J ,1-1-1-1-, 1 ,_,u... ZII-1-' 'U-I , ~'w' wa::: Tree # ant ame 0 12 1 0 1 0 1 _0 :r:' U) I I (f) , 0 ':r: 0' 0 0' 0 a::: ' 0' a.. ' ~ ' 0 1 I-- ' I'V' I'V , Z 'D: D: I (L , , " , 1 I 1 . " I I 1 1 , 1 u....1 u.... , , 1 C R d d 4 I 1 I I 170' 20 3' 1 I' 'I"" " " 1 I:' 1 oast e woo 1 I I , I '.' 'I I ,I"" I I 'I' '" ____n_n ______m_______nn_____n__nn n__tn+n-~n--t---+n+-n __nf---~--nln- ___tn-+-n~--nf-n+---tn- _____~----fn-+-nt------f---- n_t-n+-ntn-- __n ....... , , , I " '" I 1 1 1 1 1 "'" ,. 1 I I I I I' ,I' "" I' "I" 'I' I , 1 1 " ,I' 1 I , , I' I I I I I 'I' , , , , 'I I' 1 I' I I I I 'I" 1 I' I 12 Coast Redwood 19: : : : :70: 25 5: 1:: :::: 1 J ::::: ::: ______ ___ ____ _________4____~~ _ __ _. _ __ ___ __ __ __...__..... ___~.___~ _ __......___...___ ____...__ _~____.. --- _ --.. --- _I_ ___ ~__ __... _ --..- -- _ ,.--- ------1--- -..---.....---..- -- ---... - --- -- -.--~-I----~ 4___ ~--- ....... 1 , 1 " '" 'I"" I I I I I I" , 1 , , 1 I " I" I 'I I' 1 I 1 , I 1 , 1 1 I' "I " I I 1 I I" I 1 'I 1 3 C R d I 1 1 1 165' :1:' "" I I I" 1 I 'I 1 1 oast e wood 16 I I , , , 120 4' " ,I"" 1 I I I J I" __ ~ _ _ ____ _ __________~__ __ _4_ _____ ___ ___ ___ ____ f- _+___~--- _~-- _ + ---~--- --- - ¡..---~---. f--- ---~----¡..-- -~ --- - J..---+- --f --- - -- - -~-- --f---+---i-- -- - - ¡..-- - - --- f----I-- --~-- -- ---- ....... , I I I I 1 '" I 1 . , I I ,'I" I' I I I I I " ,, I' 1 1 I' I"" ,I' I , , 1 'I I" 1 I , , " I I 'I' I" , , , , 'I I I I ,,, I I' I I I I I I·' I 14 Coast Redwood 14: : : : : 50: 25 2: 1:: I::::: ::::: :: J - ______ __ ___~___ __ ___ - __ _~ ___ ___ - - - - - ~ ___ - ___ ~,. __......_ __ ~____..___......__ _...___ ---1--- _~__ --,. --- ---.. ----I--~- ..-- -- ...---~- -- -,.- - - -- ---~----.. --- .....---.-- --- -...- --- -- -. - -- -I----~---- ---- ....... 1 I , I I I I 1 I 'I" I I , I 1 I I 1 I I , , , 'I I' I "" I' 1 1 I J I 1 I 1 , I , , I I I I 1 I I I , 'I I' I I 1 I' 1 1 I 1 : I' ::, I:: 1 'I I I ,:: I 1 I 15 Coast Redwood 18: : : : : 60: 25 2: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: ___ _ _ ____ __ ____________ __ ______ __ ___ _ __ _ __ ____ T--""---'-- __,,_ ---r~ --r--~ --- _ r~--'----1'- - - ---T----r---' ---- r~ -- ,-- --1' --- ----- ,-- --1'---T -- -T - -- - -- r- - - - --- T- --.,...- - -, ---- ----....... I 1 I I I I I 1 " 1 I I 'I' 1 1 I I , , , , , 'I ,,, 1 I I I 'I ,'I" ,'I 1 1 1 , ,I I' 1 'I 1 1 " I 'I 1 I 1 I I I I I " I I I , I I' 'I I I I I" 16 Coast Redwood 16: : 1 : : 60: 25 3: 1:: ::: \ :: :: 1:: ::: _________ ______~__________________________ _~__.¡,_~......___~____..___......___...___ ~.:--L.---~ ___1.___ ___..__~~I____-I____..___..I____...___ -----~----...---......---..------I.---- ~--...-~--I----..---- ---- ....... , I 1 I , 1 I" I 1 I I 'I 1 'I I , " I I I I I , ,I 1 I I' I ,, I I , I 1 '" I' 1 I I I I I' I 17 Coast Redwood 17! ! 60 ¡ 20 1! 1! !!!! ¡ !!!!! !!! _________________________________ 1 : : : 1 i_::::: : ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ : ¡ ¡ , , , , I" 1 I ,'I I' 'I I I , I I '" I I I"" 'I 1 18 C t R d d 20 65' 20 l' 1 1 "I' 1 1 I ,'I I" __C2?_~___~n~~~_____nn__n____ "I I 1 , 'I I!! 'L--L-I~ ~- 1 I I I' 1 1 1 I 1 'I 1 " I , 1 1 I' I 'I I'" 1 I' 1 , 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I ,I' 'I I 19 Coast Redwood 8 ! 40! 15 2 ¡ 1 ¡ ¡!!!! !!:!: :!! _________________________________ I ¡¡I I ,---¡----ji ¡,I I' I '" 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I' 1 I' 1 I I 1 I' I 1 I 1 1 " I' I" 1 1 I _________________________________ I I' , ' ,'I" I I ,,' " 1 20 Coast Redwooð 7:: 40: 15 2: 1: ::::: ::::: ::: __ _________________________________ ~~-_____t_~~t_-:- ~~~t_--- ~-r___:__~-~:__ -,·r--1-J--:-: :---':-.}- --- I , I , 1 I I I' ,I 1 I " I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I' I' I I' I I I I 1 I 'I I 1 I , 1 = Best, 5 = Worst 2 10123 N. Wolfe Road. Cupertino Job Name: Vall co Residential Project, Job #: 08-05-158 Date: 9th, 2005 August -.Ç: \ -- o ~(') Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs , I ' I I I I I , I I I I I I I r , I' I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I , I' I' I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I : :0::::: 1-. L- r ~ I I , I,() .-- I' I I __ I Z I I L- I I ill : INN: 101 ',- ..- ill I 0 ' ........., ..- I '_ I I -- l.J... ~ Olw :c:>I..} c:>1 II-I <.9 ~ >- N WillI- _ Z: -- : C) : « : -~ t:: _ I- ~ 1,()'-lm ZIZI~lrn 0 ~ ...-- LL. « -.... , , I- I '-' - I _'I V W U- ...;. ::2: N :2: ~ s¡ « ! ~ ~! z ! ~ ¡ ~ 1 0 º ©):~ @) i= I- lÕ¡ W: a::: : I- w: ~ : (f) : ~ ~ ill a:: ~ '00 I (f) (f) I, 0::: I Z ,;5 -I I I ' W I « W W (L u...' I....... W '1"""1 10'~ 0' '.........1...... Z ill ,>- u- W -I ::J I I I- I I-L- I U- W C) I-(f) ~ I- 0 I:I-:~:O ~:~:~:~ > 00 z ill ¡...!.. Wr- I « 1-: Ü : _0 : a:: : : : OW Z- II- T.... ill -l I :) 1 I <C I I I ....J :2::....J I I ~ ~ a::: <e:a::::ZIN O:O:O:OI~ m ::J 5::) m m « w ~ WII-:O:« a::::a::::a::::a:::~w « a::: o:~ 01° - I (f) II(/):O:I 0:0:0:0:0::: ü:~ I I I I , 'I I , '60 20 '1 ' , I I I 26: : I 2 II : :: : I ,.-. Î "1..------.- I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I 21 : : :75: 15 : : : : : : I- .... ... ... ... +- I I I I I , I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I' I I ~ ~~~~-t- 20 : : 75: 20 : : : : : : I I I I I I I I I r r r r r r I I I I I I I I , I I' I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I .. .. .. .. .. .. I I I I I I I I I 19 : : 70: 20 : : : : : : .. .. I.- .. .. l.- I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 ! "! 70! 25 ...··....I........···..·I..·.....'....·..T··....T...... I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I , , , , , , Recommend Status , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .- I I 1 ~ I I _ ~ : : -J c<? ....... : :e:(,... W I 1>- (j) : JO >- « ..........1 rv I 00:::: I- ('0. W Ujlu...lc:; - W ~ .~! illN i w a::: ('0' ill O-_ID:::OWn:: a:::...J1 - ill L_ o::w-:CD:::Ct:r- :'S f-- b:' Z 0.. f-- 0 -,:;:w~,:;;w~ O>lJ.. :.....(90 O(fJ(fJ~:>«w f-- 0 0 0,0 f-- f-- owwU::;:¡¡:O Owww:wwa::: 0:: z z 0:::: a::: I 0.. --- . , , , , , , } } } , , , , , , I !. I , , , , , , ~ , , , , , , t--I , , , , , , ,--,. , , , , , , ~ , , , , , , ~ , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , . , , , PestlDisease Problems , . I I 1 , I I I I I I I I I 1 ú)'! ¡ ! .-! 1 I I I I U")I I ~I 1 , 'I I _I I 1 ..--, ! w! : : 0: , U), I I WI : « : : let::: I WI I -, Wi I U): -: I!?: >: lõ:U(I~1 0: I I~'->-' Ü' _'~ _I I , Uj: 0:«: 0::: I I 101 <{, ~'o 0' W' ...J' -: ~: : ..JI (fJ1 a::: 101 01 I-!O !Y:: oJ ~:w 0:2: 1-: (f)IW «I:=>. 01 z!CC ~!a:::! 0: _:,.1- It-, 0::, I I I I I I' , · . I I I I' I r 'I-.--'------¡- I I I I , · I I I 1 I . 'I I .. .. .... .. · I' I I 1 I I I I I I' I ... I- I- I- l- I . I I I I . 1 I I I , I' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I r r r r r I 1 I I I I I ., I I I I I I .. .. .... .. I I I I I I I ,. . I I 'I I I.- I.- 1.-.. .. I I . I I I I I I I I I 'I I , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,-,' , , , , !. t , , , · , , , , , , , , , , · , , , · , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , . , , , 1 1 2 2 , , , , , , , , ·····..~·······r , , ±D. ·..·..·1···..·' , : : I , , , , , , , , , ---T----I"'---,---~I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___...___...L..___..I____, , , , , , , , , , n_ , , , , , , , , , ---r-~T---r---I ' , , , , , I' I I , , , ___.1.__.-'-___..1____1 , , , , , , , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , -----~----T---~---T------T---- I I . I I I I I I . I I I' I , I I I 1 I I I I I I , I I I ____...I____.___~___J.______.____ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I ___T____r___'____r---~---T--- I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I I , I I I I I I I ___...____~___..I____L___J____.I.___ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 : 2: ! ----r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 I 2 I : ----~--_..I----~--- , , , , , , , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I ......··...T...····I....·..T..··..T..........·T· I I I' I I I I I I ...........l.......i........l.......l...........t. I I I I , I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I ·······'"..··..·,.......·......·T· I I I I :[.......I.......1.......1.......I.....J I I I I I I I I , I , I I I I , , , 3! 1 ..·....T·..·.. , , illI. , , , , , , , , , I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I _____~-_--r---~---T------r---- I I 1 I I I , I' I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I _____~____..___J.___...______..____ I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I ___'----r---'----r---~----T--- I , I I , I I I I , I , I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I , I ___J.____~___~____..___~___~__~ I I I I I , 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ! 2! ¡ ---r---'~---T--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 I 1: I ___~~___J____~___ , , , , , , , , , 16 ! .J! 11 ! : ! 65! 20 ----T--~---'----T---~---r--- I I , I I I 1 I I , I I I I , I I I I I I I I 16: : I : : 60: 20 ____~__~___J____...___...L..___L___ I I I I , , I I I I I I I I I , I -, $ BARRJE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES 14œJJ5}\052 ~ ,,"'_.. lo.sGalo5,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 21 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 22 ç¿~~_~~!S~5!~_~~5!_______________ 23 ç;_~?_~~!S~_q~~~5!_______________ 24 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 25 ç¿~~_~~!S~5!~_~~_q_______________ ................. 26 Coast Redwood ................. --------------------------------- 27 ç¿~?_~~!S~5!~_~~_q_______________ --------- 28 Coast Redwood --------- -------------------------------~- 29 Coast Redwood -~------- ---------~------~---------------- , 30 Coast Redwood --------- --------------------------------- 1 1 20! : : ! ! 60: 20 ----T--~---,----,---~---r--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I 1 I I I I 23: : : I :75125 ____...__~___J____...___~~__~___ , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 = Best, 5 = Worst 3 -t::, I -- Job Name: Vall co Residential Project. 10123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino ~ 0 Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs PesUDisease Problems Recommend Status __. I I 'I I I I I I I' I I I , I I I I I' I , ,I' I I I , ' " lIt 1 I I' I I I I I 1 "I '...-..' I I I I' : : :: ::: : LO,: : :...-..: ::: 1 I I' I I I I I I I U")........... ' I I : : : 0: :: : .- :::..::: ~: ~ : :..J : M I- : : :"'7 : .- : z : : w¡ : w : :. :~: :: c:( : ~ ~ BARRIED COATE ttJ 1 : I~:N 10: j:: ~ :w::: w: w : ::>:- . : I- 0 0 : ::..-; :-: I -- :<t:::: a::: (/) : :0:>- d LL, Willi I (9 I oq- (') , I- I (9 =It r I W 1 -, W' « -' I'V I OOI!::: I r- ('-" N I uJ I- I I Z I ......... <.9 . « , - I- I (f) I _, Ii) I 'ill LO I LL. I ...:: - ill an ASSOCIATES _: W I- ~ :ú?:-:(') Z Z:a::::(9 bt! 0 - :_:L():~: >: (/) .:W:W:o:: C"" w ...- I LL « -.. I I I- I Z _'I 0 I :S ill 10::: , 0 I . I _, 0, - ~ I N I a:: 10 ill (408)353-1052 .¢ ,:2:: N :2::2: : S: «: Z « I Z: 1-: ~ 0, 0 0 ,........: : s: >-: 0: 0 oc-: ~: :;::: ill g: . :W: _ b='-: : 0::: ¡:: : Z: : (f) I ill - LO: : : «: 0::: 0:: ill: -: C: ~ cr: ~ 23535SummltRO<Id@),I-I@)1- 00 u:> I ~ I Z ,~ -'W, I- , ooW' ::::;: t Z WO::o.. I ~ I 00' 0 ' :5, :5 f-' I- , Z I a. f- 0 '00' (j') I u..1 1-"" 1 I I.......' W ...-1 I 'I I 10:::' W' losGaII)5CA95030 0:::" 0::: W W ...-1 ~I 0' cr: 0'1-' 0:::' 0::' Z _101 0, WI ..J' ..J :«, W, I -J W W , W:>-: W: -: : _: :::: w c.9 (f): 0::: : 0: : >':: :E: d: r- I- I(f) I 1 I- I 0 I I I- , I- ,0 ~' ~ ' ~ ' ~ '> 00 Z f- ' 01 :> I ....", I 01 0 > ILL, -== ':> (') 0 'II , 'I- I......... f-'O'_IrY I I I I W '1>'..3...' 0' 0 ,I-=:;I A" W '-f- . , 'w I' ~w . ~, 0 I u.. , , I '0 Z- Ü I I 0, Z I I (f) I (f) I 0 . 0 f-~ W oc:::I I I I (')1 .-JI......' I~ I I I 1.-1 IW' I I 1-1 I- 0'0' I I- "':;:.-J: I: I::2: _: 0::: «: 0::: Z: 0: 0: 0: 0::2 co ~ ill: W: «: ::>: 0: 0 : : (,)::2: - «1~IrolrolA" W'o.. W'f-'Ol 0:::1 0:::1 O:::¡ 0:::1 W'''''''''' ~ (f)IrY/WlrY' 0, 0 ill,W,~,~ 0:: 0 PI tN -, I , I:::: I I I I "" ,........ u.... Z,u..I 11.1-1 I W'lli!' wa::: Tree # . an ame 0 ::2: 0: 0 : R I: en I: (f) : 0 : I 0: 0 : 0 : 0: 0::: : ü: 0.. - : r- : 0 : I- : Œ:: Œ: 7=: 7' : 0:: : c::: I 0.. 3 C d 4 I 1 I I '65' 30 4 I 2 I' ," I " I 1 I I I , I _____~___ ._~?_~~~~__~_~95!_______________ ~__+__~___~----~---~---~--. ____~---~-w--...- ---~.---~---~.---~---~----+--- -----~----.--.~---~----.-.---- ---f----~-·-1--·- --------i I , I I I I I I' I I I I I I ,'I 1 I I I I , I I I I I I 'I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I" I I , , ,I I I I I I '" I I , I I' I" I I I , I I I' I I I ,'I 32 Coast Redwood 7: : : : : 70: 15 2: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ _________________________________ ----t--~---1----~-.-¡¡---~--- ----~---1----r--- ---~---_¡-·-1----r---1----t--- -----1----~---1i---~------r---- ---t----r---1---- -------- I , I I I' ,I I ,, " I I ,I' ,I' I , , , I' ,,, I I , I " I' I' I I I 33 C R d 22' I , I : 75' 30 1 I 3: I :, I' d di 701' I "I ,'I _________ __~?_~~__~__~_~95!_______________ ----f.-~---4~---~---~---~--- ____~---~----}--- ___~----}---~----~--!~J?Je~T!-~ -----~----.---~---f------}---- ---f----}---~---- ---~---- I I , I 1 I I' I I I I " 'I I' I I , , , , I , "I ,'I I I' I ,I' 1 I I , , , , " 'I I I I I I I I I"" ,I' 1 I , 'I I" I' I , I' I I I I' I I I 34 Coast Redwood 23: : : : : 75: 30 1: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ ________________.________________ ----t--~---1----~---~---~--- ---~---1----r--- ---~----~---1----r·--1----t--- -----l----t-·-1i---~------t---- ---t----~---~--·- -------- I I I I I I' I 'I I I I I ,I' I I 'I I , , , I I I I I' """ I" I' " I , , , , :_ I I: I :: I I : I ,: I' I I I , 35 Coast Redwood 25: : : : : 70: 30 1: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ _________________.._______w______ ----T---r---,----,----r---~--- ----~---'----T--- ___,____~---'----r---'----r--- _____'--·-r----r---,------r---- ---T----r---,--·- --- ---- 1 I , I I '" "," I "I' I ,I' , , , I I I I' I "I' I I ,'I' I 1 I , , I , I " I I I I I I 1 I' 'I I I I ,,, 1 1 I I " ,I' ,I'" I I" I' I' 1 36 Coast Redwood 21: : : : : 60: 20 2: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ _____w___________________________ ----t--~---1----~---~---~--- ----~-wwlw---t--- ---~----~---1----~---1----t--- -----lw---t---~---~------t---- ---t---~---1---- -------- , , I I I I I I' "'" I I I I 1 I I" I , , I I I I' I 'I I , I I "I' I I I , I , 1 , 'I '" I I I I : I I 1 I I' I I -: 37 Coast Redwood 31: : : : : 55:30 3: 3:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ ________.________________________ ----T--~---~----,---~---~--- -.-~---'----T--- ---1----r---'----~---,_---T--- _____~----r·--,_---1------r---- ---,----r---,---- -------- , , I I I I I I I I' I I I' 'I I' I 'I I , , I I " I I I I I , , " I I ,'I I" I , I I " ,I I I I , I I I I I "I I' I I , , I I I ,I' '" I I' 'I I I I " I 38 Coast Redwood 15: : : : : 45: 20 3: 4:: :::::: :: J:: ::: _______w_ _________________________________ ____£__~___~___~___~___~___ ____~___~____L___ ___~____~___~____~___~___¿___ _____~____L___~___¿______L____ ___£_w_~___~____ -------- I I I , I I 'I ¡ ,I' I I' I I I I I I I I I , , I I ,I' 'I I I I I "" I I I , I I , I " I I I 'I" I' I I " I ," 39 Coast Redwood 14! ! ! ! ! 50 i 25 2! 1 ¡ ¡ !!!!!! !!!!! !!! _________ _________________________________ ____T__-r__w~----,---_r---~--- ____~---~----r--- ___,----~---,----~---~----T--- _____~----T---_r---1------r---- ---T----~---,---- -------- , I , I I I I' I I I I I I' I I 'I I I I , I I I I " I I' ,I I I I' I' I" 1 I , I I I , I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I ,'I , I I , . I I I I I I I I I I' I I ,I' I I , 40 Coast Redwood 14:: : : :55:253:3:: :::::: ::::: ::: ~----- --------------------------------- ----\--'1---1----1---'1---1--- ----1---1----\--- ---\----1---1----1---1----\--- -----1----1---'1---1------1---- ---\----¡---1---- ----¡---- Î --'-- , ...:... Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino = Best. 5 = Worst .:::::. Job # 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 4 Recommend I : : · , , , , , , , , ¡ : !- i7) : !..J 1 <{ ,.!. : let: <¡- - : :>:- WI: 0 1>- C'-- (f) : I:E:I'- w « lí)1 0:::: WI C2 ",. ill W : WI : W n:: fQ s: ~ : 0:: I º ill I- 0. oc~:c:o:: 0::: 0::: w!~:z:Q.. I- ß :s l-:o::::wl..J ill I- ...J §IW::2::ct (9 0 o >llL::2::> « w ü 00:(/):0:0 t: l- I- O:O:U::æ: 0::: 0 o w:w'w:w w 0:: o WWZ1n::::o:: I 0.. 0::: Z '---- I Status PesUDisease Problems , , , , , -, on , ~: -, 0: W' æl w' >: 0: u: æ: :5: --11 0: u' , f-' 0: 0: æ' , ¡ : r J : : : : : iÕ: : : !.,.!..: : ! I_I : I [w: : : I wI I I : «: : : : WI: lÕ: 1(/)'........1 I I I-!,,?:s: 10 "'"" I >-: I I_I I LÕ:~:O:«: , I:> I 0: ü, ..., 0: I WI --:0:::0:0¡ (f)'ÜIS:I~1 I- I : : I O:W10IZ: w'W:«:::I1 UJJa:::w:o:::: ~!""':O:I-: I ro o , , , I : , , f-' Wi w: lJ..' , N' -' ~, ...J.!~ A\:W ""',f- o::::U) w'>- I-J(I) W' , ,- :;¡:'f- «:--.J _::J o:~ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES 1'001 35}I052 3535SualmllRnad losGalos,CA 95030 ~ --I · , , · . , ---1---"---1--------- , . , , . , t 1 ! · , , , . . , . , ---+----~._-~----~---~ , . , , . , , . . I I I I I -----~----.---~---f------.---- , I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I -----~---+---~---+------+---- I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I 3 I 1 I I ----~---~----.--- , . , , . , t I I ---1 j · , , , , , ---f~--~---~---- ---- , , . , , , · , , · , , , . . , , , ---~---~---~---- ---- · , , · , . , . . 1 I I I 1 I I I I -----i----f---~---~------~----, 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I -----~----~--------~------~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ---~--~-~---~----~---~----+---' I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I ---f----~---i----t---~----f--- I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I ---~----~---~----~---~---~--- I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 2 ¡ 1! ¡ ----~---~----+--- , , , , , , , , , - --I , , , 4: 1: : ---~---~----+--- , , , . , , , , . 2 I 1 I I ----~---~----}--- , , . , . , , , , , . , , , , , , , ---T-~--r---'----·---~ , , . , . . , , , · , , · . . , . , ---+---~---~----.---- , , , , , . , . , I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I -----'----T---ïi---~------r---- 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I -----~----+---~---~------~---- I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ---~----r---'----õ---iî---T--- I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ___+____~___~____L___~___+___ 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I . I I 3! 2 ¡ ¡ ----õ---,----õ--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 : 2: : ----~---~----+--- , , , , , , , , . 17: : : : : 55: 20 ·---I--'"---1----j---'"---f--- I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I , I I 1 20: : : : : 65: 30 -- - - +--....---....--- -+ -- -....- --.. ---, I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9: : : 1 ¡ 40: 25 ----f--~---~----i---~---t--- I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11: : : : 140: 25 ----+-------....----+---....---~--- I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 16: I : : : 70: 30 ____}__~---4----f---~---t--- I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 101";: 9: 9 ¡ :60:25 ____+__~___....____+___....___L___ 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 Plant Name Tree # Coast Redwood -----------------' 41 --------- ___~_~___lÇ;_q?_~~~~~\Y_q~_'!_______________ ---~-~---.ç;-~?_~~~~_'!~~~~--------------- Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 45 Coast Redwood ~~~::,;~~~[~::~~~~::~~~;:.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 44 --------- - , . , , , , , , , ---T----r---'--- · , , · , , , , , , , . · , . , , , ___+___.J..___+____, , , , , , . · , , I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I -----'----r---~---T------r---- 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I -----~----+--------+------+---- , 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 ---~----r---'----r---'----r--- I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I , 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 ___+____L___~____L___....____+___ I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I , , , · , . · , , ---~----r---.,----I , . , , , , , , , 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 _____.,----T---,----~------T---- I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I --- ----r---'----r---,..---T--- 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 4: 1! ! ----r---'----T--- , , . , , . , , , 19 ¡ ! ¡ ! ¡ 80 ¡ 25 ----T--ïi---'----.,---~---r--- 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 _1!_1__JL___j____l___JLª~l}_~I__~_L_?_j____t___ I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 3! 3! ! ---r---'----T--- , , , , , , , , , ___~~___[ç;-q?-~~~~-'!\Y-q~-'!--------------- ___~_~___ ç;_q?_~~~~_'!\Y_q~_'!_______________ -I · , , . , , .......~.......+. , , , , , , · , · , , , ..+...........+. , , , . · , , , , ...........1.. , , , 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 .......1........1.......+.......+. 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 , , , 3: 1: : ____L___~____I.___ , , , , , . , , , 24! ! ! ! ! 80! 25 ____T__,-___.,____.,---~---r--- 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 15: : : :. : 60: 20 ____+__~___~____+___.J..___L___ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I Coast Redwood --------------------------------- ~-------------- Coast Redwood --------------------------------- Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs r 1 I I I I 1 1 I , I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I , I' . 1 1 1 " I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : :: : 0: :: :::-- · I 1 1...-' 1 1 1 I L() : :: ¡ I: - : : Z : t-: : I 1 1 I 1 ~IN 1 10 I II ,...- : :..- 0:0 : "7 : :- : : - 1 IW IUJ ,(.9 "'\t (.91 1"- 1(91~ >- : : w W: I- _: Z - C): <c 1 -~: !::: , 'lJ.. f-, « IL()l L: In Z Z·I 0:: 11"\ I 0 rv I 'I 1 1 II r- '-'" - _I '-'" I u.. · I , «I~ 1,,"""1« Z Z Z,O Z I'W 0 : : :N ~:_ :_1 _ « :1- - 0:0 - 1 1 1 A\ ;:::: I I- Lí)1 W a::: I- w Z 1 (f) (f) Z' w n:: : : :~W:(f) 1:0:: Z <C...J I:W « W1w a. : : :æ W:W ~:~ 0 a::: ü t-: a::: , 0::: WIZ (.9 : : :~ 1-:0 I:"- ~ 0 ~ ~:~:~ >:(f) Z I I 1 r- 1 « ~'ü - ....... 1"1 1 W· · , 'w I'W ~,~ 0 ~ ., 0, ,-Z I 1 1 1 ...JI --' ~ I I I...JI : :I:~ ~:a::: <c:a::: Z 0 0:0:0 ~:m:~ : :001« W:a. W:I- 0 a::: a::::a::::a::::W:<c\a::: : :0:5 I:W I:W ü I ü ülü:ü:a::::ü:a. 1 I I 1 1 1 ---f----~---~-··-~---~-~·-+--- I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I ! t 1 ! 1 1 49 --------- 50 5 = Worst 5 = Best, 1 Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 ....¡: , --, ~ ~ Recommend Status I I I - ' "' '- , :.-J C'1 ~ : « .;.. w ,> - (j) 10 >- -< - ~ ~ I-- C', W lO u.... .,.::;: - W (j') ,.!.. W W c::: ('-. w -O_':::!D:OWct: 0::: --.J - W ct:W-OD:ct:f- :5f-h:Za.f-O --.J~WW...JWW OSu..:O":(9tJ Oenen:O>-<w f-0000!:::f- o w w () :0 ct: 0 OWWWWWct: ct: Z. Z. D: D: I.£h - .....+-1 - , , ...···t·, , , , ~ , , , . . , ................,. , , , . , 0 , , , , , , ....···(·...···T· o , , , , 0 , , n...l. o , , Pest/Disease Problems --;- o , , , -, "' , , , ~, -, 0: W' ",I w' >: 01 0' , "': :51 --,I 0' 0: , f-' 0: 01 "" , ¡ i I , 0' ..,,··t· .......;............}. , " , " , ., ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ...........+.......,........,....................+. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I , I I I I I I I , ...........}.......\-.......}.......}...........}. I I I I I I I I I I , , I' I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I ....................1................+·.·..·....·.0.· I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I , , , : , I , i f I I , , , , , , , , , ,-, I ,lO, I I 'I I I ~I , 1-' I , , 'w ' J (f) : « : : W : í£) : ~ LD'I I '0 "~ _:~ ::::..: >- LO: 0 « " ü ~:O 0 w enlct: Q 0 1-:0 s: ~ ~:w 0 Z (/):w « =:1 zlO:: ~ a: _:..... I- "7 ~ >- !::: ct: º ct: 0.. (9 Z Z ::> ct: 0.. Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs ¡- I I I , I , - I t I I" ' I I I ,I' I I I , I 1" I I I , " ' I ' I I ' ! : Ie! ! I '......-1 I : : ': -- Z 1-: I ,N,N 0 II : 1-00 :-~ - : : WwW :C)~C:> ~ ~: I ill I- I- G)' Z Z C) 0:: b!:! I : LL « « , : ¡::: C) - I ~'I 0 (9 :>: : N 00::: ~ s: « z ~: Z: L- ~ ': · ~ - ~ L ~'Z'~ en 0' · IH' ;:::: I- U)' W r- W' . (f) Z 0 : \':::!jr-(/) .:cr::z«....J:¡::W;,c:: : ~ æ W s:~ 0 cr:: ü 1-:~Icr:::W: · W 0 II-- - 0 I' ,WI ! I-- ~ « ~!ü ~:cr:: ~ ~!~:~!>! · W rr\ W -!I:J 0.« :> >1>,:>.0. : I ~ ~ cr:: <.(:cr:: Z:N 0 o:o:o:~: : :00 « W ~ W:I-- 0:« cr:: cr:::cr:::cr:::w: : :0 ã I (f) I:W O:I ü ü:Ü¡o:cr::: : .. I 2: 1: ::: ----¡..---1----~--- ·..·..·I......·:·......·}...·..·}.. I . I I'" I . I 1 I . I . I I . I I' .. I I 3: 4:: :::: ____..___....____..___ .........................1.......... · I' . 1 I . I I' . I I . 1 I' I' I . 3: 1:: :::: --- _ 1-_ ~ - ~- --- ~-- - .......;. ....... :·.......I......·}.. · ,L ..., · .. . I . I I r. ..,. 1 1 I I" I 3 : 2:: :::: ____..___....____..___ .......1........................·..· I I' ,. I , · . 1 .,.. · I 1 . I . , ". o W o W W z en w -' (]) -< u I (]) o 171: : : :75:20 ---¡--""---~----1---""---f--- · I , . , . , 1 I . I I I . . I . . 18:: : : :65:30 ----.--~---....----..---~---..--- · . . I . I · . I I . . , , . . I , 17: : : : : 70: 20 ----}--~---~----~--~~---~--- I . . . I · . . I . I · I I I I . , . I I . . 12: : : : : 70: 20 ----..-------....----..--------..--- I I I . I . I 1 I I 1 . · . . 1 . I : , , i , , f-' w: w: u..1 N' -' ~, ...}!~ "",'w ~.':I-- o::::w w:>- f-,en w' , ~:¡::: <.(:...J _::::J o:~ -I -I , 0 , , . , ·....·.,.......T· , , , . , , o , , , , 0 .......I.......~. , , o , , , · . ,. . · . ,. , · I I' , ·..··......T.......··......,·····..T......·....T· I . 1 I . · . . I . · , I I . , , .L , , , , , ..1. , , , I . 1 I I . . , .......~........:........~.......4-. · I I . I . I . I . I . · I . I · I . I , . . I .......1..................··....·..· I . . . I , . I 1 . . , 20: ! ! ! :75!20 3:2: ! ____T__~_--,----~----r---r--- ---r---'----T--- · I , . " I I . , I I . " I 1 . · . I , 1 I .., · . . . . I .. I 23: : : : : 80: 20 3: 2: : ----.-------....----..--------..--- ----..---....----..--- · . . . .. I" · , . . " ... · . . . ,. 1 1 1 t 8AR'" D. COA IE and ASSOCIA US (4001353·]052 ~ """0.'. losGalos,CA 95030 Tree # \ Plant Name ~ 51 Coast Redwood ----------------------------- - 52 Coast Redwood ----------------------------- - 53 Coast Redwood ----------------------------- - 54 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- - 55 Coast Redwood ------------------ - 56 Coast Redwood --~-- -I f~ , 0 , , , , ·..···......·..T· , , , , , , , , , , o , .......1.......... , , , , , , " , ,. , 0' , ·'··..·..T......·....T· " , '0 0 " , , , , ..·.....T· , : , , I' . , . .. . · . .. I .L.......I........I........L...........~. · , 'I . , , I' . , , I' . , ., o " , " ..·....T·......·.......·r·......T· , " o 0' I ''''':'' , , , , , , ......L........ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---T----r----,----, , , , , , , , , 0 . , , o , , , , , ___.L____~___..____ , , 0 , , , , , , 1 = Best, 5 = Worst 6 I . . I L · I I' . I L I' . _____'____T----r----T------T---- · . ., . · . 'I I I , I I L · r .. , · . .. . · . .. I _____~____.L___~___..______.L____ , . I' . I I I' . · I . I , · 1 I . I . · I 1 1 . I , . , I I I -__T____~---'----r---'----T--- · . I I I 1 · I . . . . I , . . , , I , , , . . 1 . I I 1 . · , , , , . ___.L____~___..____..___~____.L___ , . . , I I I . I . . L I . I I , . 57 Coast Redwood 13: ¡ ! ! ¡ 75: 20 4! 1: ! __________________ ----T---r----,----,----r---r--- ----r---'----T--- , . I . .. I 1 , · I . . I 1 .. I - ' , . . . I ". I 1 I I .. I' I 58 Coast Redwood 18: : : : : 70: 20 3: 4: : ...... ._----------------- ---_..__......---~---_.._-_......_-_.._-- ---_.._--~---_.._-- , . I I . I ,I' I . . . .. I" r , . . .. '" 59 Coast Redwood 15 ¡ ! : ! ¡ 70: 20 4 ¡ 1 ¡ ! _________ _________________________________ ____T--~---,----~---~---r--- ----r-~-'----T-~- , . I I .. . . , , , . " I I . I . . . .. L I I 60 Coast RedwQod 12 : ¡ ¡ :55:20 4! 2! ! _________ _________________________________ ____ __......___~____..___......___..___ ____..___~____.L___ I I I .. .. I , I , " ,. I , . I ,. I . -L \ ~ Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino ~ Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 1 I . I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ---f----~---~----~---~----+--- 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 I 1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 I 1 , 1 , I 1 I I I 1 ---~----~---~----~---~----~--- I 1 1 , I 1 1 , 1 , I ¡ i ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ I 1 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 ---~----~---~----~---~----+--- , 1 , , . 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 , , 1 1 1 , I I 1 1 , , , , , I , ---~----~---~----~---~---~--- , , , , , , , I , , , I 1 , , , I I I I I I , , I , , , , , , I 1 I ___~----~---4----~---~----~--- , , , I , I , 1 , , , , , , , . , I , I , , , , , , I I , 'I , 1 , , I .......,........,.......-1...,...,......,.,.......,1...... , , 1 1 I , 1 1 , , , , , 1 1 , I I I I I 1 , , , I I , I . , , . , , , , , , ....,...............·..T······'I'···....,.......·'···.. 1 . , , , , , , 1 , , 1 1 , , 1 , , , , 1 , 1 I I , , , , , , I , , ~.......I........I.......·.I.···...·...·....I..... , , I , , I , , , I I , , , 1 , , 1 I I I I I I , , , , , , I , , , , , , , I , , 1 .......'I'.......,.......·.....·..T··....·I··......r--' 1 I , , , , , , 1 , , , . I , 1 I , - - - , ' , . , ' .......,... ..1.. -- , ' , ' . ' status - ~ PestlDisease Problems Recommend I . ", , ' , I ", 1 I 1 , . 1 I I ' I , I" I 1 I lû: : :..--.1 : : I I , , 0.01..--. I 1 -r-I 1 , 110.0 I ,- --: : : s:' : ....!: (") w: : : 0: s : c:t:: ~ (j), I I W' W 1 >1- «: : : 0::1 (f) : 01 >- W 1 1"-' W 1 ;¡j __ 1 rv -== I .- ('0. 1_' LO I' I I,J.... ..::;;'- UJIL()I I' >1 U?IW Win::: ('0 W (5! ~!~! 0 ~ s! N o::! 0 u.i W ..- I __I >- . (j 0 o:::':J I - W 0::: L():~lo:«: æ a:: W:- CIO::: a::: I- ;.::5:0:0: <: <: t-:}ÿ z:a.. t- 0 --,0' ,W' .J .J «I W,....! w CfJ'o::'~IO' .-I .-I >'W :Zl- W I-- ::::OO:>:LL :-GO 1--,0, I::::¿' (j Ü CfJ'CfJ :EI> A'" W 01 , , I I 0, 0 ~ W'W10'Z' I- I- 010 ' I- I- w:wl<{::JI 0 0 W:W O::E ii 0 z:o:::w:a:::: 0 0 W:W !81JE, w cr: _:1-:0:1-: a:: IX: z:z ...:... :c 0... ,,'1 I' W 1 , I' I , I 1 'I I ' I c----4----f---1t---I------f---- ---1----'---;---- ---- , I ,I' , 1 I , , I" "I , , I' 1 ,,' _____j____i___Jl__~i______t____ ___i____L___l____ ----l---- , , " 1 ,I' \ , , I" ,I' , '" I ,,' 1 ,I, I ,,' \ _____~----.---~---f------~---- ---f----~---~---- ---~---- , I ,' I I I I . , I" , I I I ,I I ., I I , ,' ,,' I I ,I' I' 1 , , I" ," I _____~____.L___~___-I______.L____ ---~---~---~---- -------- , I ", I" , , . 1 1 ", I . I I 1 1 I -: 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I' ", . , I' I ", -----'----r---~---;------'I'---- ---T----r---~---- ---~,---- , , ", ", I , I' 1 '" I , , ", ,,' - - , . , ' , ' ... .... , ' , ' , ' , , , , , . ......-1........... , , · , , , , , , . , , .......,....,..'1'. , . · , , , , , , . · , .......L_.......I.. , . , , , . . , , .........1.. , , , , , , ........'1'. , : I I " 1 , , " , I 1 1 , _.L.......1........1................·...·...· 1 , "' ' , I " I , , " 1 i .....-'1'. , : : , ...........'1'. , . , Condition Pruning/Cab ing Needs I ' " I I I I ,I 1 ' , I I" 1 I ' I' 1 I ' ,I 1 1 ' " I I ' I' I : 6': ::: -- . -r- ' I" lO : I 1..- I : Z: t- . : ~I ~ : : 0: I ~ : <.9 I : : ¡::: : <.9 >- , Z ~ G,ml«' - ~ I- , _, Z' ....... , I ~ 0 - :~:~ G _:z:O::::<.9 a::: 1 -r- '<{ Z Z I z" ° I Z 1 I W ° :~'o::: - «: :1-:-:0 0 - ~'w ~ W1Z'(f)IWlz w a:: ..., I «' -, 1-' "0::: Z rv ~'IIW,«'W w ~ ~, 0 ~ 01 'rvlrvl Z ~I~ ,I-'~'~'w G I:~ ~ 0 ~:~:~:~:> CfJ z '0 - 0:: ' I , I W ~'O "" 0 -z --.JI:J « I 1 I I ~ <.(:0::: Z N O:OI010:~ ro :J W:I- 0 « a:::: 0::::0:::: 0:::: W <{ a:: II(/) ü I o:o:o:o:a::::o ~ 2 ¡ 1 ¡ ¡ ~--r---,----T--- , . , . . . ! t ' . , , 1 : 2: : ---~---~----~--- , , , , , . , . , 2! 1! ! ____r___'____T___ , , . , , , . , , , , , 1 : 2 I : ----~---~----~--~ , . , . , , , . , 2! 1! 1 _N__~___~____~___ , . , , , , , , , 5: 3 I I ____~---~----t--- , . , , , , ! ! ! , , , 3 I 1 I : ----~---~----~--- . , . , . , , , , , I \ 3 ' _2_~----f--- ---r , : , . , 9! : ! ! :45: 15 ____T__-r___,____,____r---r--- , I , , I I I , 1 , , , , I , I , I I I , , , I 13: : : : : 45: 20 ---_...--~---~----~---~---~--- I , I , , , , I I I I I , , 1 , , , 22 ¡ ! ! ¡ ! 90! 30 _____T__-r___,____~---_r---r--- I , 1 , I , , I , 1 , I , , , I I , , , , , 1 , 15: : I : : 70: 20 ----_...--~---~----~---~---~--- 1 , . , , , I I , I , I I , , I I 1 Measurements " ' " ' " ' : I : I ¡ , , , , , ..- 0:0 W w:w w 1-,1- LL «:« , N ~:~ : :@ï=:"-CfJ 1 I W' : : a:: w:w : : : wI-: 0 , . ,I- I'« : : :w 1u.J 1 II II:2 ~Ia::: :ro:OOI<t: w:a.. :010:5I:U) 16: : : : : 55: 20 ____I____---4----;--------f--- I I , I , I , , I , I , 1 I I 1 ' 1 1 , I , , , 23 I I : : : 80: 25 ----~--~---~----~---~---~--- I I 1 , , 1 , , , , I , , , , I , I 6: : : : 120: 10 ____+__1t---~----~---1t---~--- , I I , I , I , , , . , I I I , , t , , , , , , 20: : : : 175130 ----.--~-~-~----~---~---~--- , , , , I , , , , , , I I I I , , , , , : i , , ~' w: w: LL' , N' -' ~' ~ b~ A':W ""',~ a:::lw w:>- ~,CfJ w' , 2:¡:: <{:--.J -:~ 0::2 _._.~-~ ~ ,ARRIE D.COAIE and ASSOCIA US (408)353-1052 ~ -~..." Los Galos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 61 Ç;_~?_~~!3~_c!~_~9_c!_______________j 62 Coast Redwood ----------------~---------------- 63 Coast Redwood ~------------------------------_. 64 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 65 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- - - 66 Coast Redwood ------------------- .--- - - 67 Coast Redwood ------------------. .--- - - 68 Coast Redwood ---- --, · , , , , , .......,.......'1'. , , , . , , · , , , , . .......1........1.. , , · . , , I , I I ' I I " I , , " I ..........'1'.......,................,...........'. , I " I I , " ' , . 1 I ' 1 , I I , , I " I I 1 " 1 ............I........I........I........&..........·,.&.· , 1 1 1 I I 1 I I ' , I I' I 20 1 ! : ! : 85 ¡ 25 2! 2 ¡ ¡ ____T___r---,----,----r---r--- ____r___'____T___ , , , I " ", I I I 1 I 1 ", , , , , " I' I 17: ! ! ¡ \60:253:2\ ¡ ____.&.__~___~____~___~___L___ ____L___~____..___ I I , I I' ,I' , , 1 , " ", I . I 1 ': " I ---- 69 Coast Redwood ------------------ 70 Coast Redwood 5 = Worst 7 = Best, 1 Job Name: Vallco Residentia: Project, 10123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 -t:. \ --.. - r ~ Pest/Disease Problems Recommend Status I I I , , I I I I , I' , I _, I I I . l!): :.-: : : , I lO I __ I , =..: :~: ~ : ....J: c=;- W: ! Õ ~ ! <C¡~ (I): : w w : >:- « I ,a:::: (jJ I 0 1>- ill' -I W l5 --.1 I'V ""== I I- ('-. I ll)1 I L.1... ..:::::1_ C/),;;::-. I I > "9, W WI ^'" "- ill - I ....~ 1 , 0 (j) I u... ~ -. ill 0: ~:~: - :::'. ~ a::: 0 ill a:: I __I >- I Ü 0 0:: ---1 I - ill ~ lÕ: ~ : 0: « : 0:: a:::: ill ¡::: I Zc : ~ 0:: 0 ~:S:O:U: <C <C ~ 0:::: :).L. .- -101 I ill I ~ ~ ~ WI WI...J W W I 10' O. --' --':> 1",,==' I-- (1):0::::5;: : 0 0;> u.:.z:<:( (9 Ü f-U:U¡ :~: Ü Ü (/) (1)::2::> « ill 'WIO,Z, ~ t- 0 0,010 1- L- WI 1-0"'1--.1 I 'U100::::' - r- WlW........'......1 0.0 ill W' ,..::::: 0::: 0 Z:OC:W:o::: 0: 0 ill W:~:~ ill Ii:: _: 1--: 0: 1--: a:::: a::: z Z: :..... :r: 0.... - , " , I I " ...........}.. t-..··......~- ..··..·l..···..~.. , l' I I I I I I I I' I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .............., .............. .......1............ I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I , , , , , , ·...·..·r..···..y·· , , , , , , , , , , , , ................... , , , , , , 0' ~ >- f- ¡¡: o IY 0.. (9 Z Z ::J IY 0.. Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs 1 I I I I' , I , I I I I , I I I I " J I I , I I I I I' I I' 1 I , ,I 1 I I : : Ô: I: : L- I ' ..- 1 I I r- I I ,1_ '2 L-' W : : N: C'\I : 0 ~I w. 0 r -,- 1_ II ~: ~ 0 w : ~ ~ ~ :~ ~:~ N 1 w I- 1 _I Z - C): « I -~ : _, 'lLW 1-.- 1 L() I;:: (t"\ Z Z. cr: D 1 0 ,- 1 « -.... .' 1 r- "-' - __I 0 . W ~ ::2: N ::::2 : SI « ~ ~ Z: I- ~ 01 0 ¡Q\ W 1 r,::¡\ - ~ -: W a:::: .- w Z: (/) (j) 1 W ~I-: ~ I- (/) ~Icr: Z ~ ~ I:W ~ Z:W 0:: (j): 0:: tß UJ SI ~ 0 0:: 0 ~ 1 0::: a::: W: z ~¡;;I Wf-OI:f-f=O~~:~~~I(J) W-!-: I-WI«I-:üO-a::: : OIW 1-' rt"l UJ ~.~ ~ ' ,~ :2: ....J::r: I:2 ~,o:: «:0:: Z 0 0:0 0 :2:0) ~ ~:m OJ « W:n.. UJ:~ 0 0:: n:::o:::cr: UJI<C 02:00 ÔII(/) I:(/) ü I 0 0:010 0::::0 . , , ·....:-1 I , --I , , , , , , , ¡ f f 1 . 1 . 1 . 1 I ·..·...~........:·.......·..·..·t· · 1 . . 1 . . . 1 . . 1 · . I · . I · . 1 -................,........... 1 . . 1 . . 1 . . . 3' 41 , ----~~--~_._-+--- , , , , , , 15: : : : :60:25 ----I--~---i----j---~---f--- 1 1 . 1 1 . · I . 1 1 . . 1 1 'I I' 1 _~~_l__JL___J___.j___JL?~L?_~I~~_L_?~J____l.__ · 1 I 1 . 1 I I I I 1 1 . 1 I I 1 r 1 . . I' '" -1 -1 ~ , , , , , , ........f..·....T· , , , , , , , , , , , , .................... , , , , , , · I 'I 1 I 1 I' I 1 I 1 I 1 ·..........T··..·.........··......T··......·..T· · I . I . I . I 1 . · 1 .. I I 1 .. . 1 . I' 1 · . I' . ........................................................ · . .. . 1 1 I' . · 1 I' ~ 1 . . 1 . . I . . . . . · 1 . 1 I . .......1·......·'........'·......T·......¡........r-- 1 1 I I 1 I · . 1 I . . I . 1 . I . 1 . 1 . · I I . 1 . .......1........1........1........... · 1 . . 1 . . . 1 1 1 ¡ 2! ! ----~~--'-·--T-·- , , , , , , ! 1- I , , , 2: 1 I : ----,,---~---_..._-- , , , , , , , , , _I , , . , , , ·....·..'..·....T· , , , , , , , , , , , , ........1........... , , , , , , , " , " , " ..........·T" ......T·.........·T· , " , " ~ . 1 · .. . 1 I' 1 · .. . ...................................................... · I' . 1 . . I . 1 1 · ¡ I 1 . 1 I · 1 . I ....·..,.......-...·.....r··....·T" I . 1 . · . 1 . I , . 1 1 I . 1 . 1 · 1 . .......1.................1........... 1 1 . 1 I . 1 . 1 I 1 . 1 ! 4! ! ---~--·'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 : 2: 1 ---,,---~-~-_..._-- , , , , , , , , , 15! ! ¡ ! ! 70: 20 ----T--~---,----,---~---~--- · I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I . , , I I , 1 . . 1 . 1 28: I : : :75:30 ____.__~___~___~~___-L___,,___ · I I . . I I 1 . 1 . I 1 . . . . --- , , , , , , , , , ·..··..·r.......T·....··.··· , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ........1................ , , , , , , · , .. . 1 1 . I 1 I , ., . ·..........T··....·..·....·.......·T....·......T· I 1 . 1 I 1 I' I -----:.. . . 1 1 · .. . 1 .. 1 · .. . .............. ...1........1............... I I' J 1 . 1 I · " I I . 1 I . . . · . . . ......··......·.......·T.......T· · 1 . . · . . , . 1 1 · . 1 . 1 . · . . . , . · I 1 . I , ................I.................J........I........L-__ · 1 I I . I 1 1 I , . I I . . I . 1 ! 4! ! ---~---'----T--- , , , , , , , , , 1 ! 4! ! ____L___J____..___ , , , , , , , , , · . I 1 I · I . · I I 1 . ·.........·T....·..'........·....-·T....·......T" I . 1 I . I 1 1 I . . 1 I 1 ~ · I' I · I' I 1 I' , ............... .1..............·.·.......· I . I I I I 1 'I 1 , , , T , , , ~ I 1 I I , I . I I 1 I I .................1................·...· I 1 1 . 1 I , I I 1 I 1 1 : 3 ' 1 4----1--- ----~--- I I : 1 : , - , , , 1 1 2: 1 ---~---~----...--- , , , , , , , , , 15! ! ! ! ! 45: 20 ----T--~-~-,---~,---~---~--· I , I I 1 I · I I I I I · . I , I I I I I 1 I 22: 1 1 : : 751 25 ___~...__-L_~_~____...___~___L___ I I I I . I I 1 I . I I · . I I I I 22 ¡ ! ! ! ! 60! 25 ----T--~---,----,---~---r-·- · 1 . I , 1 1 I , 1 I , , I . I I I I . 1 20: 1 : : : 60: 20 ----t--~---~----1--~~---t--- I I . I I . . I I I I ----r- --~_.._- I I ~ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES (406)353-1052 ~ m,,_". losGalos,CA 95030 Tree # I Plant Name !î'""1 ç_~5'_~~~~_d.~~'?_d._ - 72 Coast Redwood ------------------- - 73 Coast Redwood ------------------- - 74 Coast Redwood ------------------- - 75 Coast Redwood ------------------- ....... 76 Coast Redwood ------------------. - 77 Coast Redwood ------------------. - 78 Coast Redwood ----------------~- - 79 Coast Redwood ----------------p- - 80 Coast Redwo'Od 19:: 1 : :75:25 -~--f--~---~----i---~---~--- I I I I I 1 I I I . 1 I . I I I . I 1 I I I I 28: J : : 180: 35 ---~--~---~----...P--~--~~--- 1 I I I I I I I 1 . . I I I I I = Best, 5 = Worst 8 Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N. Woife Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 -L \ - 2i'\ Status '7 ~ ~ ~ æ ('". w o w 0:: - W f- a:: '0:: 0 0.. f- W -' W f- «l90 > « W o f- f- :;: õ:: 0 W W 0:: a:: ID_ , , , , , , .................y.. , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , ---~---~---~~---~---~---- , , , , , , , , , - Recommend I : , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , -.. I I I 1.0 I :...1. -,.!.. : '« : -- , : >, W : I 0: (/') I I I <{ -:œ:::E: uJ LC(:W:W: !R :s:~:o::: o 0:::1-1:0' a:: W:~:Z: :s ~:a:::I.lJ: -.J g;:W:~: o >:LL!:!:: Ü (1)\(1):0: ~ 0:0'0: o W:W\W: o ill'W:". 0::: Z: ZI I , , I.......,.. . .......1 t , , , , , . - , , . , , , ····..·..t· . , : , Pest/Disease Problems ---, , , , _: "', , , -, -, 0: W' "': w' >: 0: ü: "': :5: -': 0: ü' , f-' 0: 0: "': f i I , , , , , , , , , ,.-..., I I l(), , I " I I T"""I I I _I I I , , W ' , , , (f) I. I ~ , , - , , W ,-, , U) , ~ GJ: ': o I I::"" s:>-: G):;E: 0 «: , I:> 0' ~'o 0 w: _I 0 I w:n:::> 0: 1-:0:> ~: o:w:o z. w:w\« =>: (/):a::::w 0:::: ~:I-:O 1-: G) , ~ >- t:: 0:: o õ:: D- 19 z z ::> 0:: D- Pruning/Cabling Needs , , , , , , z o ¡::: 19 « z 0:: - 0 Z f- ~ (f) I W f- 0:: ~ ~ o 0 0:: 0:: o U , , : : , , , : , . , , , , , , , , , .. o W o W W Z (f) W -' ill « o , I I I , I , I I I I I I I , ·······....t·......¡....····.......{-·.....··..·}· I , I' I , I I I I It! J t I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I .....................1.......·'·....··........····.....· , 1 I I , I I I I I , , I' I , , , , : , , , , , 'f- :I :l9 , - c.9!~: z' , -:0: ~:z: «:w: G:::w: ;f::>: :>::0: 0::2:: Q:::W: OlD:::: - I I I I I I I I I I I .......~........:........~.......}.. I I I I I I I I , I , I · r- I , I I · I . . 1 . . . ................1....·....··....·..· · 1 . . · . . . · . I . ; , , , Condition , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I 1..........1 r 10. . ..,-' ¡ ¡ N¡N' , .-..,- ! ! c.9 ¡.¢ C) ..........2.- :It(:¡=:G ~ ,,,-'«'2 z : -' a::: I - « lÕ: w : I- LlJ r 10::: Z, « ......J S:::> 0:0::: ü III- ~:o ~ 1-:0 -:0::: ......J'::> 01<:( «10::: Z:N 0 W:I-- 0:« 0:: I:U) O:I 0 Measurements , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , f- ' , , , , , ill . I I W . . 1 t, : : : I- 0 0 u... . 1 W LlJ C"'J ., W t- _ : \ W I- « "'7 : : LL «: 00:::: oo;:t.::2.. I N ::2.,,,,:: ~\:W:: -: ¡:: ~d-- I I @ t-. (f) '(/)' I (/)' 0:::" 1 0::: W' W w:>-: : w : 1-'(/)" 1-10 W :~ I : I-w I: « 'I-' 1 rn 1 W ~:......J: I: I ::2. ~:a::: « I:J I CO' co « WID.. _0 :~: 0: 0 _0 I: (/) I . 1 _ ' , 3 : ]_~~___~_~_ ---~r-. . : . . , , , 1 : 2: : _w~_~___~____·~__ , , , , . . , , , 21: : : : : 85: 25 ____!__-e___4____j___-e___f___ · 1 . . I 1 · . I . 1 . I ' 1 I I ' · , . I . . 40: : : : : 70: 30 --~-.----~--~-_.-..~-------~--- · I . r . I I . . . I I · I , . . I . I 1 . . . I I , . I I ......""..............y...........y. , I' . I 1 I I 1 1 1 t , , , , , , , T'" I . I . , I · I 1 . 1 I .......~........:·..····{·......t..·····:··......:·· I . I . 1 I · . 1 , . I l' 1 1 . 1 . . 1 I · , 1 I 1 I I l' . ____w~__._..~___w~_~.~____~____ · , 1 I I I 1 . 1 . · . .. . · 1 I I . 1 1 . . . . I . I . , . ___~____~___~____~__w~___.___ 1 I . . . . 1 . . 1 I 1 · I I . I I 24: : : ! : 65: 25 2: 1: : ____+__~---~----i---~---t--- ----t~--4----~--- · . . . " . 1 1 · I 1 . .. .,. , ." 1 " · I I I .. I" 16: : : : : 60: 25 1: 2: : ---_.-------~---_..-----~--~--- .--~-_.~-~--.-_. I I . 1 . I .., 1 . I , I I I I I 1 I I I . 1 .., _I , , , , , , , ---~----~---~----.----: , , , · . , , , , · . . , . , · , , , , , · . . · . , , , , , , . · . I' . · . . I . I I . I . _____'--~-r-w-~w_-,------r---- · . .. I I I . I . 1 . I' 1 """" - I . . I 1 I I I I ' · . I' . .... I---- I I . I . · . 1 1 . 1 1 .. . : , I . I I : I . I . 1 ---i----t---4----t---~---t--- · I . I . I I . I . . . I· :. :. :. :. :. I . 1 . . . I . 1 . . 1 I . , . . . . . I . I . . . · . 1 . I . · I . . , I 1 ¡ 2! ¡ ----r---'----r--- , , , , . , , , , , , , 2: 2: : ----~---~----~--- , . , , , , , , , 31 ¡ ¡ ! ¡ ! 75: 30 ____r·-~---,----,---~-_-r---' · I . I . I I . I 1 I I · . I I I , 1 . I , I I 11: : : : :60: 20 ---_._------~----~--------~--- · . I . 1 I , . . I I 1 I I I . . . , , , r~·-' , , , , , . , , , . ~ ~ , , , · . , , , , ---,,----'---_..I----I · , , , , , , , , , , , 1 1 I 1 1 · . .. I · I . I 1 T T T T T · . .. I · . . I 1 ~ ~ ~.:. ~ · 1 .. I I . I 1 · . I' . _____~_~__L___~___,,______I.____ I I . I 1 I 1 I' . · 1 . I I · I 1 , . I I . 1 1 . , I . I . I I T T T T T T · . 1 I . 1 I 1 . . . . · I I , I I ...... I . . I . 1 · . I . I . · . 1 1 . I ___,,____~___..I____.___~____L___ 1 1 . . I . · I 1 . I I I . . 1 , . 1 ¡ 2! ¡ ----r---'----r--- , , , , , . , , , , . , 1 : 2: : ____.___~____L___ , , , . , , , . , 29 ¡ ! ! ! ¡ 75: 25 _~--T--~---,----,---~---r--- 1 . I . 1 I · . . 1 I I , , . 1 1 1 · 1 . I I I 23: : : : :75:25 ____L_______~____,,________.___ · 1 I . . . I 1 I 1 . . 1 . . , I 1 t------~-----. .--- I ~ OARRlE o. Com and ASSOCIATES 14001 J5J. 1052 ~ ""_.~ losGalos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 81 Coast Redwood --------------------------------. 82 Ç;_~?_~~~~_<!'Y_~9s!______________ 83 Coast Redwood -------------------------------- - 84 Coast Redwood -------------------------------- - 85 Coast Redwood -----------.-------------------. - 86 Coast Redwood --------------------------.------ - 87 Coast Redwood - --------------------------------- - 88 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- -' , , , · , , ---i----~---~----·---- , , , , . , , , , · 1 I 1 ' 1 . .. 1 · . . I . .____'-_--T---~---T------r---- · 1 I' I I I . I , · . I' . · . I . I · . . . . , . I I I _~_ ----r---'----r---'----y--- · . I 1 . I I . I . · I , , I 1 ¡ 2! ! ____r___'____r--- , , . . , , , , , , , , , , , .......1.......1.. , , , , , , I . . I I · . I' . · 1 I 1 . ......................1........1.......1............1.. I I 1 1 , · . .. I · 1 1 I 1 1 . , . · . 1 . I . . 1 .......1.................1.......1.. I I , I 1 . . , · I 1 . , , , 1 : 2: : ____~___~____J.___ , , , , , . , , , 18! ! ! ! ! 80! 25 ____T__-r___,____,___-r__~r___ I I I . . . I 1 . . . . · . . , I . I . . . . I 15: : : : ¡ 80: 25 ____.1__-L___~____.1________.___ · 1 . I . I I 1 1 , . . , 1 1 I , I 89 Coast Redwood ---------~------------------~-------------- - 90 Coast Redwood = Best. 5 = Worst 9 Wolfe Road, Cupertino 0123 N Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 -L I - - ~ Status - - Recommend I I : , , , : : : , , , , , , : '- íif ! : -I ! '1 ..... I 1« ~ -- : : >:- W I 10' >-- ('-. en I : I I- w « û): a:::: ~ : æ ("-- w W,: WI : ow D:: (f) ......, N: a:: W I- (5 ìX!:::¡:c:æ 0::: 0 0:: Wi=::z¡a.. I- w :5 1-1a:::W1-I W I- -.J g;:w:::2::« <.9 ü o >:LL':2::> « W () udU)!O:~ t: 1-0 I- 0:0'0:..::; a::: o w:wlww w a:: o WI w: D::' a:::: I 0.... n:: zl 2, I , , , , , , ......·1..·...+ , , , , , , , , , , , , ··........·····t·' , , , , -i-t- , , , , .~.......}. , , , , , , Pest/Disease Problems -. i , -, "', ::..: o w 0:: W > o Ü 0:: :5 -' o Ü f- o o 0:: f Iff I I I I 1 , I I I I ...........}.......J...............}...........{-., I I I , I , , I I I · I I I · I I I I 1 I I I I ....................·'·.......1......·+...·..........· · I I I I I I I' I ¡ ¡ i i ¡ I I I I , I I I I I , I 'I I ....··.....T···..······..····....·y··......···y· , , I I I , I I I I , I I I J : " , " , ] Lõ': : : I: : I ,. I I I_I I : wI : : U) : : -<, I 'wI -, :(/):-,u;>: :-ILO,......, 10' ,...........' I I:::,: >- : -:~: I <e: LO I 10: 01 ~: : 0' : --IQ'O:W¡ (/):a::::>:o: I-:ÜI>I~: ü:w:o:z: W:W!«!::J: (/)I 0:::1 W,Ct:, ~¡I-:O:I-: Condition Pruning/Cabl'ng Needs I J I' t I I I I I , I I I I I' 1 1 J J 1 I J 1 J J I , .--..1 1 I I , G' I' I , J t I ...- T"""' I 1 'l{) t : .--.. : : Z 1-: t ~: ~ : : 0 IJ ~ l'):' : : ¡::: (9 : >- '--"IZ:~ ~:(9:~ -:~ c I~:~:l') ~:z:æ (9 ~:o æ 'T"""I~'Z Z'~-IO Z ~,w 0 :-:æ:-~: :1- -:0:0 - ~:w: :1- w:~:w ~:Z:w æ l.œIZ'~ ~'I'W ~IW'W ~ ~, 'O'~ Ü'I-'~ ~I ·z _. ::>. I I I LL LL' w' l') I:~:~:O ~:~:~:~I>IW Z I-'Ü'_I~ I , 1 1 'w '~'Olu.. , , , '0' -z ~. --,' I~ ' , , , J ~ ~:æ:z: O:O:O:O:~:ro ~ w:I-:O: æ:æ:æ:æ:w:~ æ I:W:O:I o:O:O:ü:æ:o ~ · " I 1 I . , , I , , .......~........:........}.......}......+. I . I , . , , , . , · 1 , , t · , , , , , , . · . , . .......4.....·..,................"'·, , . . , I I I I I I I , Measurements I- 0 0 W W W W I- l- LL « « N :;; ~ ©-I- I- W er:: m w w I- 0 I- :c « w w :c :;; 52 D:: (D«W~ o¡s:cw · , , i , : I , I ¡ , · , , I , , , , , , , · : , I , , , :c m ° , , , , , I , , , , , , , , I , , , I , 1-: wi wi LL ' , N' -' ~, ~l~ ¡Ç::¡,:w """I- cr:::UJ w:>- I-'w w' , :2 n:: «:-.J _::J 0::2: .-.-.------- 11 l' , ----~---~--w~t--- , , , , , , . , , 1 : 2: : ----~---~----~--- , , , , , , , , , , , , ,. , , , , , , ........... , , , 2: 1: : ----~---~----I--- , , , , , , -'- t ! -I , , .....1. : , I I , , , I , " . I I I' . ...........~.......I.............................~· I , I 1 , 1 I . I . . I I I I . , I I . I I . . I ................I.................¡.. 1 I I 1 I 1 1 . · 1 I . , , , 1 : 2: : __w_~___~____..___ , , . , , , , , , 26: : : : : 85: 30 ----f--~---~~---{---~---~--- · . . . . I , 1 , 1 I I · . I J I J I , I I . . 20: : : : : 70: 20 ----.¡.--~---~----~---~---~--- I I I 1 . . 1 I 1 . I . 1 I . 1 I . -I , , , , , , ····..·r···...·T· , . , , , , , , , , , , .......!........... , , . , , , 1 . . I 1 , . 1 1 · 1 . I I .......·...T....·..'·....···,·······y........···y· I I , , , 1 . 1 , , I I , , 1 , , , , . , . . . . , . . . . ..................................................... 1 . . I , 1 , , . . · . I I , 1 1 1 1 · 1 1 . 1 1 . . ·····..·......·I·.......r·.....·Y' I 1 , J · 1 1 J I 1 . J I I I 1 · J 1 . 1 1 . .......4........'......_.I.......... 1 1 1 . 1 , . . · . 1 , 2 ! 2 ¡ ! ----~---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 2 \ 1: : ----~---~----..--- , , , , , , , , , 26!-J:21! ! !90:30 ·---T---r---,----~----r---~--- 1 1 . 1 . I . 1 1 1 1 , J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . I . 25: : : : : 75: 30 ----..--~---~---_.l.---~---~--- 1 1 1 . 1 . · . , 1 1 . 1 1 1 , . 1 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , · , , . , , , , , , , , · , , , , , , ~ , , ~, , ~'~ , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , ¡ ¡ , , , , , , , , , ¡ ¡ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , --_.l._---~--_.l._---~---~---..--- -----~----..---~--_.l._----_.&._--- ---..----~--_.l._--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---- --- ----~---'----r---'----T--- -----'----T----r---~------r---- ---~----r---~---- -, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .:.. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , . , , , , , , , , , -- ..I................... ............&.................1........1.. ... .......I................I....... ........ , , , , , , · . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , 1 = Best, 5 = Worst 10 2! 1! ! ----r---'-M~-T--- , . , , , , , , , , , , 2: 2: : ----~---~----..-_. , , , , , , , , , 2: 1: : ----r---'----r--- , , , . , , , , , , , , 2 : 1: : ----~---~---_.&._-- , , , , , , , , . 37: : : ¡ : 90: 30 ----I---r---~----~----r--"~--- I , 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 I I 23: : : : : 75: 30 ----+--~---~----~---~---~--- · 1 I . I . I . 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 24! ! ! ! ! 80! 25 ----T---r---,----~----r---~--- · . , 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 I , . . 23: : : : : 85: 20 ----..--~---~---_..._--~---~--- · 1 I 1 . I I 1 I , 1 , , 1 , 1 1 1 22: ! ! ! ! 85: 25 ----T---r---,----,----r---r--- J . 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 . I . 1 1 . 1 , I 1 1 . . 22: : : : : 85: 25 ----..--~---~---_.l.---~---~--- 1 . I I 1 I , . , 1 1 , L 1 1 1 1 I ~ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES 1400IJI}1G12 ~ ~,-,,- losGdtos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 91 Coast Redwood ------------------- 92 Coast Redwood ------------------- 93 Coast Redwood ------------------- 94 Coast Redwood ------------------. 95 Coast Redwood ------------------. - 96 Coast Redwood ------------------. - 97 Coast Redwood - ------~----------- - 98 Coast Redwood .---- -----.------------ - 99 Coast Redwood ------------------ - 100 Coast Redwood Job Name: Valleo Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 ~ ~, 1 , ~ "' ~ , , , , , , -·-t----t---i---- ----~I . I I I , , , , , , , , , ---,.----'----.I---- ____ ---~ , , , , , , , , , 1 I I , , , , , , ---T----~---,---- -------- , , . , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___.1.____1-___.1____ -------- , , , , , , , I ! = Best. 5 = Worst 11 .-J - - - - PestlDisease Problems Recommend I I I I' I I , I I 1 I I ,,, I , . I I I I I , , I' I I' 1 : G=ì: : :..-.: ::: L 'I I I lO ____ I I ,''--, , , " 1.0 1 I 1_ : __I : : ~: ~ : :...J : t1 : ill: : : 0: - : : «:.,- ,en, I I W' ill I ,>,- : «: : : 0::: lj) : 10: >- 'w. ,-. w' « ..-10:: ::2:.'..... C"'. !~!íñ'!Ii?! >: ill U?!w w!œ: ('. ill '0' liS- O. ÇQ "--'N 0::10 ill ~ ..-: ::s.: >-: ü: 0 [Y'\::J : - ill u.. LO:~: :<C: 0::\ oc w:- cqcr: cr: I- ">'0°'01 <:(1 <C 1-,1- Z,Q. I- 0 ::.: 0: : w: --1: ..J <: c::: w:...J ill (/),.......0'0' ....JI ....J >'w :2:'- ill I- :u..:>: : 0: 0 >:LL :- (9 Ü I-IO':>I~I 0' 0 (/)'cn ::2:..:::> A" W Ü' I I I I I 0'0 ~ W1W,OIZI --I -- 0'0 I - I- cn:w:<.{:::J: 0: 0 W:w u::¡: 0:: 0 '~'W'~' 0, 0 IUJluJ Z'~'OIL..L..1 , WIW,~I~ ill 0:: I L..... I I ,_ I ......., rv I I u.. I u.. I _,.---, ,.---, u..¡ u.... 2.2. I 0.... , , , , , . .......}.......}.. , , , , , , . , , , , . .................. , , , , , , Status , , , . , , ---{----I----{---- ----" . " I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---~----~---~---- ---~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .................. , , , , , . , , , , , , .......,.......'(. , , , , , , I I I I I I I I I I , I I I . _____~----r---~---,------r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----~----~---~---~------~---- I I I I . I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ____·~----r---~---,------r---- I I I I I I I 'I , . , " , , I 'I I , , " , I I I' I -----~----~---~---~------~---- . , 'I , , , I' 1 , , " , . , I I I I I " 1 , , 'I , _____'____r___,-___,------r---- I I " I , , I I I 1 , " , , , I 1 I , , 'I I I I ) 1 1 -----~----~---~---~------.¡.---- I , 'I I I 1 I' I I I I' , f j ¡ i i I I I' I I I I I I ·.......···~··....·I..·.....~·..·...~·....·.....~· I , I 1 I I I I I , I I " I 1 I I I , 1 1 ) I I , I " I ...................1.......·1......·+...··..·..·+·..·.. , I I I I I , 'I I , , I I , I I I I I I , " , I I ,I I I I " , ...........'(.......)......."I"......y...........'(. 1 I I I , I I " I 1 1 I I I I I " I , , 'I I I I I I , ...........~.......I........h......+...··......+· I , 'I I 1 1 I 1 , I I I' I I , I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I , , I , 1 , ---~----~---~----.¡.---~----~--- , I 1 , I , I I , , 1 , I 1 1 I I . I , I , I , I I , I , I 1 1 . I 1 I ___T____~---~----r---'-_--T--· 1 , 1 I I I , I 1 I I I . 1 I 1 I I I I , r I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 , ---~----~---~--~-~---~---~--- 1 , , I , , 1 1 , 1 1 , I 1 I , I 1 , I I , 1 I I 1 I . I I I , 1 I 1 1 ___T_·__~---'----r---'--_-T--- 1 I I 1 I , I 1 , , I 1 1 1 1 I 1 , I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I , I 1 1 1 1 , I ---~----.¡.---~----.¡.---~---~--- 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I , 1 1 I I 1 1 I , 1 1 , , I I 1 1 I 1 I ................1..........·.....·+· 1 . I 1 I I , I ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ , 1 1 1 1 I , I I , 1 1 1 I , 1 I 1 ___,____~---'----r---'----r--- 1 I . 1 1 I 1 I , I I I I , I I I 1 iÕ , ~ ~ >- t:: Q: o ii D- C) Z Z ::J Q: D- , , , , ·....r··· , , , Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs 1 r 1 I 1 I r , , I I I I 1 r I , , 1 , , I 1 , r 1 , ' , r r I , I r I : !õ! : r ¡ r ,...-' r I : : ,¡_ z: 1-: : :~, ~ º: I: : :~ ~ ~ r: ~:~ : -: z -- C> « -3! : I~r~ ~ Z Z ~ ~ 10 : ...!-: « z Z -Z·: 0 Z I: W ,_, _ ~ 'I- - 0'0 ~!W¡~ I- W ~!ø ~ Z!W rl~'Z ~ ~ I'W < W'W ~:~:o ~ ü I-:~ ~ :Z I!f--!E 0 ~ ~!~ ~ ~!(/) 1-'0'0 Q: , O'W ~I~'~ ' ,~ <:~JZI 0 0:0 0 ~:m WII-:O: ~ ~:~ ~ W:< I:Ø:O:X 0,0:0 Ü ~:O , , " , " , " , ·..·..·t......·I·....·..(·..·...V·· I , , , , , I . I I I I , I I 1 , I , I I , , I .......1.......·,··.......·.....··· 1 I , , , , , , , I , 1 , , , , , , ··.....·r..·..··'(· , , , , , , , , , 1 : 2: : ----.¡.---~----~--- , , , , . , , , , 1 ! 4 ¡ ! ----r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , 1 ! 4 ¡ ! ----.¡.---~----~--- , , . , , , , , , 1 ! 4! 1 ---r---'----T--- , , , , , , , , , 15: : : : :40: 35 1: 3 ¡ : ----f--~---~----~---~---~--- ----~---~----~--- , 1 I , ,I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I ,I I I I , , 1 I ,I' 16: : : : :50:401:2: : ,---_.--~---~----~---~---.¡.--- ---.¡.---~----.¡.--- I , I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I , , ,I 1 I I I I , 1 I' 1 1 1 13! ! ! ¡ ì 40! 35 1! 2! ! _____r__-r___,____,----r---r--- ---r---'----T--- , I 1 I ,I "I 1 I 1 , 1 I 1 I , I I 1 , 1 1 I I 1 , 1 I , ,I I' 1 10: : : : : 40: 25 1: 2: : ---_._-~---~----~---~.--.¡.--- ---.¡.---~----+--- I I , 1 1 I ,I 1 1 1 I , I' I' I , 1 , 1 'I I 1 , , , . 3: 2: : ----.¡._._~----+_.- , , , , , , , , , 2: 1: : ----f---4----I--- , , , , , , CL Job Name: Vallco Residential Project. 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 12: ! ¡ ! :60:20 _____,---r---,----,----r---r--- 1 I , 1 , I I I 1 I I I 1 , I , I 1 9! ! ! ! : 45: 20 ----~--~---~----~---~---~--- , 1 I 1 I , 1 I 1 , , I I 1 I 1 I I 11! ¡ ! ! ! 25! 20 ____,---r--.,----,----r---r--- I I , I 1 I I , I , I I 1 1 , , , I 1 , , I I 1 18:":13: : :60:20 ---_.--~---~----~---~---.¡.--- 1 I I 1 I , I , , I I I 1 , I , I I I I , I , , 16: : : : :40\35 ----+--~---~----..---~---.¡.--- 1 I I I 1 I I , I , , I 1 , , , I , 19: : : : : 85: 25 ____I__~---4----1---~---f--- I I , 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 Measurements f-- 0 0 W W W W f-- f- u.. « « :N 2:~ 1@ ¡::::t;; :0:: i"ß!w :w 1-:0 :1- X:< ,W 'W x:'2 S2:o:: (1):« w:o.. 0:5 I:Ø I ro o , : , , , , , , , , , : , . , , , , : , : , , f--' wi w: u..' , ('oJ' -' ~, ~!:2 ",,'w ~h-- ec::ø w:>- f--'cn w' , :2:~ «:~ -:~ 0:'2 ~ BARRl' D. COATE and ASSOCIATES (4001353-1052 ~ ill"'_'~ losGalos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 101 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 102 White Alder --------------------------------- Alnus rhombifolia 103 Shamel Ash ................ ------------------------~-------- Fraxinus uhdei 104 Shamel Ash ................. --------------------------------- 105 Shamel Ash --------- --------------------------------- l--~º!?--- Shamel Ash --------------------------------- 107 Shamel Ash --------- --------------------------------- 108 Coast Redwood --------- -------------~------------------- I L-1..º~--- Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 110 Coast Redwood --------- --------------------------------- ~-_._-- L \ - ""'V Status M o :::. ~ ~ D:: C'" w o W 0:: - W I- Q:; 0:: 0 "- I- W ...J W l- e( 0 ü > « W 01-1- ::¡; õ" 0 ill W 0:: Q:; :r; Q.. Recommend r : , , , , , , , o , : , : , , , ¡ f , , , , , , : : , , õ : I~ ~ : Ie( I : > : :0 -: e:::.:~ u;':Wlw ·S: !:::l: 0:: O::::::::!:c w:r-Jz 1-1a::::W :£:w:~ >:LL:~ (/):(/):0 O!@:u w'w:w w:z'Q:; z, , - , , . , , , , , , -------~---j----·---- , 0 , , 0 0 I ! .! - , , , , , , o , 0 ---+---~---~----~._-~ , , , , , , , , , PesUDisease Problems , I I I I , 1 I I I I I' I ¡ íD! ! ! .-.! I I I I \{)I . .,...-, I 1 I I _I , I ...-. I , -, w : : 0: (/) I I WI 1 « : : a::: I ill : 1O': w: (J) lë)' " >, I (5 ,::s: 0: I _'~ s¡ >- ! ü! L£') I 0 1« IY, 'I '0' <!" ~'o 0' w' ..JI -: I~: : ...J: if) 10:::: I 101 0' I-!O! !~! UJ ü, W' O. Z' 1--' w:w:«:~: 0: (f):a:::w:a:::: 0: ~:I-:O:f-: n::: I I' I I I I I I I , I I . -----~----I---1_---j------I---- I I I I I I I' , , I L I 1_ I I I I , I I I I I I I I I ~----~----.---~---+------.-._- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pruning/Cabling Needs ii? ~ >- t:: 0:: º 0:: Q.. o Z Z :::J 0:: Q.. . , , 'It o W o W W Z (f) W ...J m « ü f , , , , , , . I- :r; o ~ o z W W > o ::¡; W 0:: , , , , , , , , , Condition I I I ,¡, , I I 'I' I I I I I I I I I' I 1 I' I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I : :0: ::: , 1....-' I I I I I '-. I I Z' ! ¡ £i: ~ ! ! 01 : : <.9: I : : ¡:::: : _: z ::!- <.9: <.9: « : : LC(: ¡:::: <.? ~: z.: 0::: (9 ',.-'«'Z 212:,0IZ : -: a::: : - «: : I- : - íD¡ w: : I- w: ~ (f) : ~ 1 1 a::: 1 ZI 0::« -.JII'W,<:( ~I:::):O: u:.....: a::: I a:: :r;:1-:¡:::0 ~:~:~:~ .....: 01 _01 a:: : : : -.JI::::)I I~ ' , , «:n:::Z: 0101010 WII--IOI cr:a::::oc:a:: IUJ!O:I 010:°:° -l --I , , , , , , --~~---~---~---- ---- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---.---~---~--- ---- , , , , , , , , , I 1 1 1 1 I , 1 I I --~--~----~-_.~---~------~---- 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 , 1 I I 1 -----~---_..--~--_.-----_._--- I 1 I 1 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I t 1 , ---~----~---~----~---4----+--- I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I .t t \ ! ! t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 ---.----~---~----~---~---.~-- 1 1 I I 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I ---~----~---~----~---{----+--- 1 1 I I I 1 I I , 1 I I I I I I 1 , , , , 1 : 2: I ----f---~----I--- , , , , , , 1 ! 1 , 0 0 1: 1: : ----~---~----~--- , , , , 0 0 , , , 2: 1: : ----f---~----I--- . , , , , , , 0 , 1 1 1 , 1 I I 1 1 , I 1 , 1 I I I 1 -~-.----~---~----~---~----~--- 1 1 1 I , , I I 1 , I I , 1 I , 1 1 , , , 1 : 3 I I -~--~---~---~--- , 0 , , , , . , , , , , , , , ---+----~---{----...----'-I o , , , 0 , , , , - , , , , 0 , , 0 , --_._---~---~~---...---- , , , , , , , , , I , I 1 1 I 1 I 1 , -----~----t---~---{------~---- 1 I 'I 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I' 1 _____~____.___~___.______L____ 1 I 'L 1 I I I 1 , 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 . 1 ---T----r---'----r---~---T--- I I , L 1 1 I I \ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 , , 1 ! 2 i ! ----r---,----r--- , , , , 0 . , , , I 1 I I , 1 , \ 1 1 I , I 1 ___.____~___~____L.__~____L___ 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I , I 1 1 ! 2! ! ___L___~____L___ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0 ---+---~---~----] , , , , 0 , , . , , , 0 , , , , , , ---.1.--...&.._--,1.----1 , . , , , . , , , I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I , -----'----r---~---,------r---- 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I' 1 1 " I I 1 I 1 , I I 1 I 1 _____~___.L___~___.l.______L____ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I , I I 'I 1 I 1 \ I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I ---T----r---'----r---'----r--- I I , I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 , , I 1 , 1 ! 2! ! --·-r---'----r--- , , , , 0 , o , , , 1 , 1 , \ 1 I , , , I I 1 1 I 1 I ___,I.____~___,I.____L_._~____L___ 1 , , I 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 -t 1 I 1 1 I I o , , 1 : 2 I I _.__~___~____L___ . , , , , , , , , , 0 , , , 0 ---.:.----:..---~----...----:-I , , , , , , , , 0 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I , _____'____r---~---T------r---- I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I' I 1 I , 1 1 , I 1 I I , , 1 1 , I I ---T----r---'----r---~---r--- I , I I , 1 I , 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 2! ! ----r--·'---~r--- , 0 . . , , , , , Measurements , , . , , , , , , , , , , , ¡ I-- 0 0 : W w LU I w.......... _ ! :LL«<C ;:: IIN:2:2 u I ~\ - ~ - I ~.....\ nil if) 1 (f) )-: : a:: wI w -: : W : 0 : :..... ~:<:( I IW rnlW : I I:~ ~:a::: :00 rol<:(Wlo.. : 0 0:0 I:(/) , I I I 15:: I :50115 ·---1 1_---~----j---_f---f--- I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 , I 1 I I 1 , 1 - 1 1 1 , , 1 27: : : : 170: 30 ----. ~---~----~---~---~--- 1 1 1 I 1 1 , , 1 I 1 I I 1 , 1 1 I --t I I I I I 20: : I : : 70! 20 ----f ·~--~~----1---~---~---' I 1 I , 1 1 , , , 1 I --:. ' , I \ 1 \ \ I , 1 I 18: : : I :70120 ____. .~___~____,I.________L___ , , , I , I I I I 1 1 , I 1 I I 1 1 20! ! ! ! : 60120 ----r--ii---'----'---ii---r--- 1 1 I I I , , , I 1 , I I I I , 1 I I 1 1 I , I 18: : : : :60:20 ____L_______~____,I.___..&..___L___ I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I , , 18:":12: ¡ :75:20 ----r---r---,----,----r---r--- I I , I I I I 1 I , 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 , , I , , 28: : : I : 55: 25 ---_.l._------~----,I.--_..&..---~--- , , , I , 1 I 1 , I I , I , I 1 I I 10! ! : ! :40: 15 ____T__-r___,____,___-r___r--- 1 I , 1 , 1 , 1 , I I , I I I , I , : , , , , , , , 1-' w: W: LL.: N' -' ~' ..t!: ",,'l ~:t a: :< w :~ ..... ,Ù.I W' , :2::¡::: <:-.J _::J 0::2: BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES (400)353-1052 3535SummilRo..ad losGatos,CA 95030 ~ Plant Name Tree # ___1.~]___lº_~~_~~~~_d.~_~'?.9 Coast Redwood _______________M_________________ 112 --------- Coast Redwood ----------------- 113 --------- ___1.~~__lº_~~_~~~~_~~'?s!_______________ 115 Coast Redwood ---------(--------------------------------- 116 Coast Redwood --------- --------------------------------- Coast Redwood --------~------------------------ 117 --------- Coast Redwood --------------~------------------ Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 118 __.___w__ , , , . , : , , , . , , , , , , . ; , . , . , . , , , o o , . , , o , , , . , , , I I' I' , 'I I' 1 , . . 1 , _J..-1-~J..-' . . , ,I I I , 1 1 '1 I I ILl 1 ! 2 ........1....... , , , I I , 1 1 I 29: : I : 185: 20 .........I......I........I................L............... 1 I I I 1 , 1 , I 1 , 1 I , , , I I Coast Redwood -~------------------------------- 119 --------- 120 5 = Worst 2 = Best. 1 Wolfe Road, Cupertino 0123 N Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 -C:. \ - ....:f:) ---- --1 ---- -I -, PesUDisease Problems Recommend Status I I I' I' I , , I I I I I I I I I I I ..........' " I ,I I 1.0: : : -.: ::: ~: : : 0.1[:"-' : : :- _I I I ......, I£'! I '..J1 ~ W ¡ ! õ!:S ¡ : c(! ~ (/) I I WI W I 1>1- « : : cr:: (/) : : 0: >- W I --, ill I « .-' a:::. 1:2:.... "'. I ~ lÕ! u;>! >! w u;>! w: w æ ('-. W : 0 ....!-: s· 0: ~ s' ~ 0::: 0 w ~ , ........, >- Ü lOa:::. -I - w lÕ:~:<e a:::o:::w_CO:::a:::r- ...:.:>8:u 4::<ít-I-ZD..t-O _I 0 I ill :J I :j ~ ffi I..U ..J W ill (/)¡cr:O!Oo!o$lJ...2c(<.90 I-:US:~ ü:O(/)(f)2><cW 0WIWOIZ ¡-1t-DOOOI-I- mJw:«::J 0: 0 ill W () ::;E oc 0 z:a:::.:wo:1Y 0: 0 Ul I!J ~ ~ ill IX _: 1--: : I- 0:::: 0::: z 7" ¡,¡.. ... I (L , ,I I I I " ' I I I I I I -----i----I---4----!------f---- ---!----~---i---- -------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I I . -----~----~---~---+------~---- ---+---~---~---- ----, I , I I' I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I' I ...........,........,........,.....................,... I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I - , " , " , " ............. ................ , " , " , " , , , , · , .......,...........' , , · , , , , , , . , , .................. , , , , , , , , , , , , ....·..,......·r· , . · , , , , , , , , , .......,........... , , , , , . · . . · ., . 1 1 ..·.......·r·' ·f··..·..r··.....··..r·' · .. . , . . ~ ,., , . . I I · 1 . · . l' . ..............................1................·...·...· · 1 . . I · I " . · . . I . Condition Pruning/Cabl'ng Needs I' " . 1 . I ., . I I I I I ., . I . I ,I 1 I l' I' I' " " I I I I I I : 6': :: :: -- 1.,.-' . " ¡[) 1 ': -- : z ~I:' : ~: ~ : º I:: :s :~I~ ~ :~ ~:~:~ ..-:Z:- ~:< -~::~ ~'L'Ô Z z,æ ô .OIOC ~:~:z Z -'012 :w:o I_'~I ~ Z ~'- 0"0' --:w oc:~ W 2 w:ø :w:~ ~:oc zl~ ~ I w:~ z:w:~ ~:~ O\æ 0 ~ æ:~:w:z: I:~ ~IO ~:~ ~:~:~:ø:~ ~IO O-:æ: : :o:w:z- ~I::J I <C' . 1 I ~ 1 <:æ Z:N 0:0 o:O:~:ro:::J w:~ o:~ æ:oc oc\æ:w:<:oc I:Ø ü:I 0:0 O:o:oc:o:~ --,.- "" 1: 1 :: : : 1 ......+.... ___!___+___i----f---i----!--- · ' I . I I I I I . . I . . I I . . . I - . I I . I I . 2: 1 : : : : : ............ --- ----...---..----..---....---...--- I 1 . . I · I I . . I . . I 1 I , I . I I . I I I I . .......}.......:........~.......}.......:... I . I I . I , . . . I I . · . . I 1 I . · I f ................,..................... , . I , f . . I · , I . I I 1 1 · . . I , . . I . 1 1 .......,.......·...···...'···...·r.. · I . I I I · . I I - · " , " , " i.. .................. , ,. , " , " 1 : 3: ¡ .......}.......;........J... · , , , , , , , , - 2 ¡ 2 ................ , , · 1 ! 2 ···...·r..·..·' , , , - 1 ! 2 ................ , , , 14: ! ! ! :45:20 ................,...............··,·...·..r......r···..· I I 1 . . 1 I I I 1 I I . . I , I I . . I I 16: : : : : 50: 20 ................1........'......····...···...····.......·..· I . I I I I I I I . I . I . . . . . Measurements , , , , , , , , , , , , . , f- ' w : w ' LL :~oo 'w w ~, :w ~ ~ ~:! !LL« V'~' ,N ~ ::2: @):w : : ~, - ~ :~: :\'ð ~ (j) oc .Cf) I 'OC W w Wp-: : W I- .W I I W ~ 0 w' , I .1-- I -< :~: :W w :2: I~ I I I ':2 Ô æ ::Ç !::>! co I CO! < ü:i D- o :::2: : 0: 0: ë5 ::c (j) , , , 23: : : : : 85 20 ......·..1··....1·..·····:··..··..:..·..··+..··..+·....· I I , I . I I . I , . I I . I I . · . I . I 10: : : 1 :45: 15 .........,......1........,........,..................... · I . I I . I I I . . ¡ ¡ ¡ i ¡ ¡ 21! ! ! ! ! 70! 20 .....·..·,·..·..,......··I·....···'...··..r..·..·y....·· · I . I . . I I I . I I I . . I . 1 . I . , 24: : : : : 75: 25 .........1.....·......·..,.......··....···.....·..·......... I . . . I · I , . . , , I I . I -- ---- , , , . , , ·....··'....·..r·' , , · , , , - , . · , , , .L........... · , , , , , I I I , . 1 , . , I I I . I . ..........·r··..·..'.......·'·......r·..........r· · I . , . , , . , , I I , I I I I . I . · I . , I I " I ..............................1......................... I I I' I · . ,. I 1 . . I I , I . . I . I . · . I I ......·..··...·'·.....·T..··..r· I . . I . I I · , I . · I . · . . I I . ..........................1;........... · . I I I , I I · . I . 22: ! ! ! :55:30 2: 1 ........·.....··'..·....·I.........··..·..y..·..·y·..·.. .......y....., , I I I I I I , I I I " I . . I . . I . I I I I I I I 21: : : : : 65: 30 2: 2 .........1......1........1........1......................... ............... I I I . I' . . . I I .. . I . I I 1 I ~ 8AR~E D. COATI and ASSOCIATES (408)3,]·10,2 ~ =,-~ losGalos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 121 Coast Redwood ....................................... 122 Coast Redwood ...................................... 123 Coast Redwood ...................................... 124 Coast Redwood ..................................... , 125 Coast Redwood .................................... - 126 Coast Redwood .................................... - 127 Coast Redwood ,................................... - 128 Coast Redwood ................................... -I --+-- , . , . · , ......,.......y.. , , , , · , , , , , , , .......1............ , , , , , , I I .. I I 1 I' . · I I I I ............y.......,.......,.......y...........y.' 1 I . I . · . , . · . , . I I I I . · I I I I 1 I . I . ...........1.................1......................... I I 1 I I I I I I , .. , I I . . I . I . · . I I .......,........,.......,.......,..' · . 1 . · . I I I . I · . . I . . I . 1 1 . , , I . . . ---..--J_L-. . . I---.----L-_ I . I I , · . , I I I · . I I . . 1 : 1 ·.....·T···.. , . , - 1! 1 ............... , , . 21! ! ¡ ! ì 45: 45 ..............................·'.....··T······y·..·.. : : : : : : _' I , I . I 21 :40:45 ...... ..L............... , . , , , , - ~.2.~....\lþ;~·:;·:ï~:~e..l'.i~.~. 130 talian Stone Pine 1 = Best, 5 = Worst 13 0123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job Name: Vall co Residential Project, Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 (" - \ b Recommend Status , , , , , , : , , , , , , , '1 , -' , , « ~ , , > - ! 0 ~ -'0:: :¡: ('. l!{!w ¡¡: w w ('. w s¡ ~ 0::: 0 W 0:: OC1....J C ¡¡: W f-- w!¡::: z 0:: 1-10::: W D.. f-- 0 ~:w :¡: -' w w <C C9 f-- : u..1 > 0 w:U)::!: 0 « w 0:0:° f-- f-- w:w:ü :¡: ¡¡: 0 W'WI~ W W 0:: z:z1 0:: I CL , , , , , , , ---¡----~---i---- ---~ - , , , 0 , 0 , , , , , , , 0 0 , , , - ---.---~---~---- ---- o , , , , , , , 0 , , , , , , , , 0 ........ - .......,.................,....... 0 , , , , , , , , 0 , , , , , , , 0 , - _._.---~---~---- ---- o , , , 0 , , 0 , 0 , , , , 0 , , 0 .--- L- ---T----~---,---- , , , , , 0 , , , , , , , , , , , , f- --_.---~---~---- ---- , 0 , , , , ! , 0 , : , , , , , , , ---- - ---T----~---,---- 0 0 , , , , , , , , , 0 , , , . . , --_._--~--_._--- ---- -, , , , , , , , , , , , 0 , , , , 0 , ---- - ---T----~---,---- , , , , , , , , , , . , , , 0 , , , --_._--~--_.---- ---- - , , , , , , , , 0 1 = Best. 5 = Worst 4 PestJDisease Problems I " I I I I I I 'I I I I' I G): : : .-: .. I I I,{) I _I ~I I I "I,{) __1 , 1 ......, I w: : : Õ ~I' (/): : : w w -< I I I ,...,. en I I I u.. A" W 1'--'" Lll ...... (f) lòJ Ii? : > w (5 I::::": 0 !:Q .--.. ~: >- 0 0 LO: ~ 0: <:( et:: 0::: ":> '0 « « ~'O O'w -' -' _I 0' ....J....J (f): a::: >: 0 0 0 1--:0 >:~ ü: ü ü:w O:z 1-: I- LLI:w «I~ 0: 0 (J)¡ a::: w: 0::: 0: 0 ~:I- 0:1- a::: cr: , , , , 0 , I I I I I -----~----I---4----¡------I---- I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----~----.---~---~------.---- I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I I I I I ...........1'.......,......."("......1'...........1''' I , I' , I , I' , I , 'I I , , " , I , I' I I , " ~____~____~~_______4______~____ , I ,. , I , I' , I , I' , I I I I I , I " , I , I' , I , I' , ----~'----f---~---~------f---· , , 'I , , I I , I , I' , , , " I , , 'I , , I I I , _____~_~__6________4______6____ I , I' , , , " I , , " , Pruning/Cabling Needs <i¡ ~ ~ ¡r: º 0:: CL C9 Z Z ::> 0:: CL , , , , I , , I I . . . ---~----~---~----~---~----+---, , . . , I . , , I I , , · I , 1 , , , : . , , , . : , I , . , : , I I , . ---~----~---~----~---~----~--- , , , . , I , , , , , · , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Condition , .. 1 f I 1 I " I I I , I 1 'I "" · I I ,." , . \" I , ., \' I ! :0: !! ¡ · '..--' .. I · I 1'''- . Z' 1 I 1NIN :0: ¡l- I ,-\..-- .,.I : : <.9: ...t : f= : : <.9 : ..-1 Z: -- C> <.9 \ <c: J -~ 'It '~ILIf~ Z z,~,r~, 0 "1.- V - 'O'~' W I ..-- ,...... z z Z-' I Z· I '_I~ _ ~ 11-1-' 0 ~:w ~ I- w Zloo:oo:O ill I:~ Z <Co:: ~ I:w:~IZw:w s:~ 0 ü 1-1~locl IZ I!f-- ~ 0 ~ ~!~:~:~:w I-!Ü õ OC s S!~!S!O!w ~:~ Z ~ 0 O:olo:~:ffi WII- 0 ~ ~ æIOClæ:w:<c I:W ü I U:U:ü:U:~:U ...,. 3: .......¡.. , , --+- , 1 : .......~. , , , 2 1 I . , I I I 145:25 .......I........I.......~....··~...... I , , , I . I I I I I I Measurements f' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1.-1 I , .- I . , w, , I w' , , LL: : : I- 0 0 : : : w ill ill ~: : I W I- ~ '"7 I : : LL <c "" ..q-:~: I N:2: == ¡;::¡\,~, I r;:::.¡\ ~,I- ~:.- : : ~ w: C/) o:::.(/), , 0:: W'w w:>- I: : I- I(/) , , W I- I 0 W :-!. : : I- I 1 <c II-I . W t~IW ~ :~: I: I :2 ~: Ct: ::ÇI~I m: []) ::Ç w:a.. o :2: 0 I 0 0 I: C/) I ,I I \ 141 I: :45:20 ......._.:......}........:......··.··.....}......f.....· , , . , I I , , , , I . ----:,t' '" 22 , , , , , , .......1......·1· }. , , . , , , , , , ~ , . , I I I , , , . , . · I I I I , __~4____~___~____~___~___~___ I I I I . I , . I I , 1 I I , . , I I I I I I · I I' I . , I I , . , I · . , I I I ---T----r---'----r--·'----T--- I I I I . I I I , , , I I I . . I 1 I I I , I , I I I I 1 I · . I I . , ---~~---~---~-_.-~---~----~--- I , , . . . · , I , I . I I I , , , 1 ! 2 .......1'...... , , . ~ 3! 1 ¡ ¡ ----~---~---~~-_. , , , , , , , , , 8: : 1 : 130: 15 3: 1: : ----f--~---~---·i---~---~--- ---~---~----}--- I . I I " .', I I . I I I I I I , I I 'I ,. I I I I . 'I I I I 9: I : I 125: 15 3 I 1: : ____~__~___~____~_____~__L_~_ ____~___~.___~___ I I I I I' I' I , . I . . I I I . I I I I I' ., I 15!~!14! ! !45!25 ·........1......'·..··..·,......····......1'......1'...... I , I I I I , , , , I I . , I I I I . I . , . 17: : I I : 45125 ----~-------~~---~---~---~--- I I I . . . I , , , I I I I I I I I I - ~ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES 1408135~1052 ~ ='-... LosGalos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 131 Coast Redwood .................................... 132 Coast Redwood .................................... 133 Coast Redwood .................................... - 134 Coast Redwood ................................... - 135 Coast Redwood ...................-............... - 136 Coast Redwood I I 'I I I I I I , , , I' \ -----'----T---~---~------r---- · I I I . , I 'I I · . I' . , . . I I · I I I , I . ., I _____~____L___~___~______L____ I , I' . , , I' I I I 'I I I I , . I I I , I I , I I I I I 1 . ___~----r---'----r---'----T--- I I I I I I I , , , . I I I I . . I I I I I , I · I . , I , · . . . . . ---~----~---~----~---~---_.--- · , I , I . I I I I I I · . . I 1 . 3 ¡ 1 ¡ : ----r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 4 I 1: : ---~---~---~._-- , , , , , , , , , 14! : ! : ! 50: 20 ----T--~---,~---,---~---r--- · I . I I I · I I I I I , , I , . I · , , . I . 10: : : : :50: 15 ____L__~___~____~________L___ I I I . , I · I I I I I · . , I I . I , I' I I I I I I I . I I . _____'____T___~---,------r---- , , I' . , , I I I I I I' I · . . I . I I I I . I , I' , _____~____L___~___~~_____L____ · I ,. . , . .. I I I . I . , , I . , . I . . I I . I I I I I . ---T----r---'----r---'----T--- I , , I , I , . I I I I I , I I , . · . I . I , , . , , I I I I I I I I ~__~____~___~__~_L___~__._L___ · I . I I , , . , . I I , I I , . I 18: i : ! :70!30 4:2! ! ----T--~---~----~---~---~--- _--~---'----T--- I I I I I I ,,' , I , I I I . I I I . . I I' .. I · I . , ,. 'I I 7: : I : : 25: 15 5 I 2: : ____L__~~__~__~_~___~___L___ ____L___~____L___ , I I .·1' I" I . I , I I I I , , I . I . I ., I 137 Coast Redwood ................................... 138 Coast Redwood ................................... 139 Coast Redwood ................................... 140 ç;_~?_~~~~!!vv_~9_<!_______________ Wolfe Road, Cupertino 10123 N Job Name: Vall eo Residential Project, Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th. 2005 ....t: , ~ ---- Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs Pest/Disease Problems Recommend Status -,,- --- _I I' I III ",'I " I 11" I I I " l' I 'I I' I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I 'I ': : :: :::: J : --I : : :: , I I I I I I I I U'), I ---I I , I I I I I 'I I 11 I LJ")I,,-.. I I : : :0: ::::: __ : ~I :~: tl? : :. c:;- '-- I I I~I I I I , 'U') I I -, 'T'"" I ¡...J ,--- I . 1,1..-.. '2' 'I--I I, ,W I o' ".q;: I ~ HARRIED COATE ttJ I : :~:N :O::I:S :(j) : wi w : > S . : ...... 0 ::~ :-1: : :<t: : a::: Cf) : 0 >- LL 'UJ 0 UJ ' <.9 I..q- (I"\ I ...... I I C) ~ I >- I W -I Wi « __I t'V -=='-.... ('-- a d ASSOCIATES N ' UJ f- ' z' - ~ 0' «. ,- f- '(j) - "'. 'uJ "" ~ "" - w n _ I UJ I- __ û1: _ : rl'\ Z z: a:::: (I"\ L!:I 0 ¡::;: : - U'): ': >: (j) : UJ w 0:: ('0- W ..- LL --r -.. , , 1-- I \".I I 0,......... S w I,.L 0 I I 01 0 I - ...- IN^' 0 UJ (400)353.1052 ' .::2: ........ ~ s: « : z z Z : ~ I 0 : :s: >- : ü: 0 -: - ...... - UJ a::: -q- IW C'\I ~ ¡:::...-.. I a::: I ~ « z I-- I C/) 0 0 - û)1 I « I a::: I 0::: ffi I::::! c ~ a::: I- ~ 23535S,mmiLR"d @!f- @) ¡:: (j) "7 ¡ ~ ! Z! « ':J I ¡fJ ¡:;: z ttJ g: ~ ¡ ~ 8! U ! ~! ~ f- ¡ j:: Z D.. f- 0 ~' l~c"L~,CA95030 0:::>-00 er::: ~ UJ S::J: 0: a::: ü r- 0:::: 0::: W Z rr. -: 0 ~: ow: ..J: ..J s:~ W ~ ...I W ~ UJ , UJ 0 I ,_ I - I 0 I W '-' U) I 0:: I I 0 . 0 LL.:::: c( {I"'I ,--- I, ,_ ,(j) f- I' ~, f-' ~~~.~ > (j) Z ~, U '" ~ > ~ U '---" 1-'- ,--'U'_I"'" UJ - r-I 1:::L1 ü' 0 (j) "" ~ UJ ,- UJ J: ........ ..- I I 0 ' ~ '0 Z U ' 0' Z·' (j) 0 0 ;-'- UJ II- W .....J I ::J I I ~ I ...J I W I I I- I I- 0 0 ~ f- ~:...J I I 1::2: S2 a::: «: a::: : Z : 0 0 0: 0 :2 OJ::J W : W « J :) : 0: 0 u :E :::!;:::J OJ OJ: « w a.. W:.....: 0 : n:: n:: n::: n:: W <C a::: (f) : n:: W: a:::: 0: 0 W W W w ffi 0 Tree # Plant Name 0:::2 0 0: 0 I (f) I: (j) : C) : I C) C) 0: ü n::: ü a.. z :..... 0:.....: a::: a:: ~ ~ I a::: 0::: I Ii I I I I I I I I 'I I I' I I 141 Coast Redwood 11::: : 45 25 3: 1:: : : :: : ::: : _______._ __~________________~_____________ ----t---:----_:----i----:----~--- ----~---_:--~-t--- ---i---~~---1----:_---_:----t--- -----_:----t---+---i-----~t---- --- I ----:---- ,---- --- ...... I I I I I I ,'I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I' . I . I I I I I I" I I I I I I I '~~: I I I I I I I . I I I 'I' I' I ___~~~___ º-~~_~~B~_C!~~~~_____________~_ _~º_!--_!_---~----~---_!_~Q ~_º _~_~-2-~----!--- ___~----~---~----~---_t.---!--- -----~----¡----!----~------!---- ---!----!----~---- ---- ...... · , I I . I I I I I'" I I . I I" I I I I . . I I' I I I I' I I I' . I ... . I I I . . . I I I I I I I I I .. . I I' I ... ; , I I I I I ., I . I I I I' I I . I I .,. 143 Coast Redwood 10: I : : :50:302:11:· :::: I: ::: J: ::: __ ____ _~ _ __ ____ _ __ _ _______ __ __ __._ ______ ~_ _.. --t ---t - --_:----1---+---~--- ----1-- ---:- -- -t--- -- -i - -- -:----1----~---_:---- t- -- ------:---- t--~ -{-- -- i--- -- -t---- ---t --- -:--- -1---' - --- ...... , . . I I' I I I I I I I I I I' I' I .. I , I I I I I ". ,. I I I' I I 'I I 'I I · , , I I I I I I . I I I I I ,. I I I . I I 144 Coast Redwood 16: : : : : 70: 30 2: 1:: :::::: :: J :: ::: _________ _________________________________ ____.,.__....,..---.,----1---....,..---...--- ____...___.,____.,.___ ___,,____..___.,____r___.,..___,.___ -----.,----,.---.,..---,,------.,.---- ---,.----.----.,---- ........ ..... I , . I I' I I I . I , , . I ,., I I " I I . . I I I I I' I I I I I I I' I' I I' I I . I I I I I I I 'I I I . I "I" ,. I , I I , .. .., . I . I . I I I' I ,., 145 Coast Redwood 11: : : : : 55: 30 3: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _ _ _ ~____ _ __ _ .________ __ ~ ______ _____ ___ ____ __ __ t ---t- - - i---- i----t---~- -- ~.:-- t- --i- -- -t-~- ---1 - -- -----i ---- I-~--+--- t --- ------:-~- -t ----t---i ------ 1--- -- ---t--------i ---- -- -- ..... I I I I I I I I' I I I I 'I I' I' I ,. I , I I , . I '" . I I I I I " .. '" 146 Coast Redwood 6: : : J : 25: 10 2: 1: J :::::: ::::: ::: I , I I I I I I I I I I , . I ,. I I' I I I .________ ____.,.__....,..---.,----1---....,..---..--- ___,.---.,----.,.--- ___,,____¡-___'t----,.---.,..---.,.--- _____.,____,.---.,----'t------t_---- ___,,____¡-___'t---- --- ..... I I I I 'I '" . I I I I I' I I' ., I I , . I . I . I' I I . I I' I I " I ,. I I I I I . I " I I" I I I I I I' I .,. · I , I I I I' I I"" I ,.., I I I 147 Coast Redwood 21: : : : : 751 35 2: 1:: ::::: J ::::: ::: n_______ ________________________m______ ----t---}----+---;----}---+--- ----f---i----f--- ---t---+---i----f---i----t--- -----i----t----}----t------t---- ---t----}----;---- ---- ..... I . , I I I 'I I I'" " I I I" 'I I I . , I I I I I I :" I I' I I ... : I I I I I . 'I ,.. I I , , . I I' I I I I I I 148 Coast Redwood 16: : : : : 60: 30 2: 1:: : J : : :: ::::: ::: _____~___ _______~_________~______________~ ____.,.__~_~_~----~---....,..---,.--- ____~---~----t____ ~--'t----~---'t----,.---~----+--- _____.,____t_---~---+--.---t_---- ---+---~---~---- , I I I I I I I' I"" I ,.". I' I I , I , ,. ... . I I I . I 'I I I I I' I I I . I 'I .., ,. I , 'I ." I , . I · I I I I' I I I I" I I' I I I" . I , 149 Coast Redwood 16: J J : : 55: 30 2: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ _________________________________ ----t---}----i----;---~---f--- ----f---i----t--- ---t----r---i----f---i----t--- -----i----t---~---t------t---- ---t----r---i---- --- .... , I , I I I 'I I ., I I I' I' I I I I" : I I , I: I I J ::' I !! : I I '! I:: , . I I '~~. '" 'I' I . I I'" I I' I __]_~9___ ~~9_~~~~_c!~_~?5!_~_____________ _~!_l__JL___J____l---JL?~ ~_~ _~_l_~_J----l--~ ___l____l---J----t---JL---l--- _____J____l___JL___l______t____ ___l____L___j____ -------- I I I .... I I I I·" I I' I' I I I . I . : : : : :: ::: :::::: ::::: ::: Page 15 -+- I ì0 Job Name: Vallco Residential Project. 10123 N. Wolfe Road. Cupertino 1 = Best, 5 = Worst N Job #: 08-05-158 , Date: August 9th, 2005 Recommend I I : , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , I 1_ íi) : ! -J: '? ~ : '«1..- '-' : :>:- W , 10. >- ('-. (/) I : I I- w « rõ: 0:::: : ':2:W: i:2 ('-. ill W "WI I ill 0:::: ~ s!~:o::¡º W I- o a::::=:!:O:n: a:: 0 0:: uJ:I-IZ:1l. I- w :5 -IO:::::W1...J W I- -1 :£:W:~J« (? 0 o >:lL..:::¡::> « W Ü (/)\(1):010 !::: l- I- O:OIU::¡: 0.::: 0 o W:W:W:UJ W 0:::: o W' W: 0::' a::: I 0.... 0:: Z.J Z' I Status PesUDisease Problems --.- i , 0': ~, -, 0: UJ' 0::: UJ' >: 0: ü: 0::: :): ..J: 0: ü' . 1-' 0: 0: 0::: , , , , : , , , , , , , , : , , , : , , , , · , , , , , , , : · , , · f ¡ j , , , , , , , , , I lÕ: : : 't , 1..,-1 I I _I I , , , t WI , : w: ! : «: :-- I WI II[) :(/):-I I 1-11.!)'...... :o:~:-->- I I_I ¡j=):~: 0: <t:u I , :> I 0, ~'O: I W -, ~' 0 U): a:::: : 1-: ü: I ~ ü:w:01z w:w:«:~ (/): 0:::: WI a::: ~:I-:OP- Condition Pruning/Cabl'ng Needs 1 I I I I I I' ' I I' I I ,I I I I I ' I I I I I I' I I I __, I I o. I- I ...-' '1.0 : ':__ Z I- I' \ ~: ~ 0 I : :s. : (?:~ (? ~ (? ~:r : _, z: -- C)...... -~ : I- ¡I.C)IL'fn Z Z 0:::: rn Ol~ 1'1.--1\....1-_0'-' uJ,u.... :s:<e\Z Z z", ~ I 0:0 I ,~,- « Z,I- ,^ 0 ,- ~:w:u....:1- w _I(/) ~ z,uJ:O::: 110:::12'« ~ I'W « W,W¡o.... ~, '0'0:: U' I~ ~ 'Z' _I :J I' I I- , u.... I u.. W I I (9 I:I-:~:O ~:~:~:~ >1(/):Z 1-:0:-0:0.::: : : : O\WIZ- ---11::)1 I ~ I I I I--.JI «: 0::::: Z: 0:0:0:0 ~:ro:::J WJI-:O: 0::::0::::0::::0::: W:~:~ I:W:O:I 0:0:0:0 ~IÜ:~ Measurements I- 0 0 W W W WI-I- u.. <{ <{ N :;: ::;; "" - I- "" f- (J) 0:: [i w W f- 0 f-I<{ W W I :;: S2.0:: co ~ W:~ o ã IIW , r · , , , , , · : : , , , · , , , : , , , , 1-' W: W: u..' , N' -' ~, .,J.::2 6'>,'W ~:.-- a::::(/) W:>- f-,(J) W' , :2:¡::: «:-1 -:~ 0::2 - BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES (4œ)35J.I052 3535SummilRo.1d losGalos,o. 95030 ----f--- ~ · , , , , . ---t----~---~---- , . . , . , ! t I I I I I I _____~----t---_C---t------t---- I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~----~----.---~---.------.---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---t----~---~----f---~----t--- I I I I I I I I ! ! I ! I 1 , ,... 2 I 1 I ----~---~----~--- , , , , . , .! ! , . . · , , · , , ---1---:---1----1 , . . I I I · . . , , . ---~---+---4--~-1 , . . , , , , , , , . , , , , , , . ---.----'"'---..----. , , , , , . , . , I I I I I I -----~----.---~---f------~---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----~---_.---~--_.------.---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I ---.----~---..----.--~~---.--_. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I" I I I I I I ~--4----~---i--~-~---~~---·--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I , . , 2: 1: : ---.--~~----.-~- · , , · , , , , , I I I 2: 1: : --~-~~--i----t--- , , , , . , · , . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---.----~--_..----.---~--_.--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , . 2: 2: : --~-~---~-~-_.--~ · , , , , , · . , · , . , , , ---~---+--_~_---I , . . , , , , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I " I _____'----r~--~---~-~----r---- I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . --~--~---_._--~--_.-----_.---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I ---f----~---~----~---~----}--- I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I , I 2! 2! ! ·-~-r---'----r--- , . , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , . --_.-~--~---~----~--- , , , , , , · , . I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I --~.----~---~---_._--~--_.--- I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I , , . 2: 1: : ~--.--~~---_.--- , , . , , , , . , -, . 15: : : : : 55: 30 ----t--_c---~----~----c---~--- I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I , 16 : x: 5: : : 55: 30 ~---.--~---~---_.---~---.--- I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11: : : : 165: 30 ----t--+-~-~---~4---+---~--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 : x: 7: : : 55: 30 ---_.--~~--~----.~--~---~-~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11! ! : ! :40:25 ·____T__~---,----~-~-~---r--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 24: : I : 180135 ---_.--~---~--~_.~--~-~~.--~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I CD o Plant Name Tree # __]_~}___lç;-~?-~~~~5!~-~95!--------------- 152 Coast Redwood ---------þ--------------------------------- __~~~___LÇ;-~?c~~~~5!~~95!--------------- ___~~~__LÇ;_~~_~~~~5!~_~9_C!_______________ Coast Redwood ------------~-------------------- 155 --------- · , , , · , , , · , , , · , , · , , , · , , , . I . , : , , , · · , t , · · , , · · , · , · , · t , , ~ , : , · · · , · i · , : · , , , , r , , ¡ , , : , , , , , , , , · · , · r · , t , , : , , , , , · , , , , , , · · , , i · , , , · , , , , · · , , i , , : · , , , , r , , t , . , , , , , · , , , · , , , , , · , , · , , , , , , · , , , 2 , , , , , , , , · 156 ,Coast Redwood ---------~--------------------------------- , , , , , , , , , , , · , , · , · , , , , , . , , r , , , , · , , · , , · , · · , , , · , , · , · · , , , , · , : · : , · : · , , , , , , 1 , , · , , · · · , , 2 1 60!30 70:25 , : , · , , , , , · , , · , , , · , · , · · , , , , · , , · , , , , , . , , : , 13 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 157 , · , , , · : , · , , · , , , , , , · , , , . 20 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 158 , , , , , , , , · , · , , , , · · , , · · 2 50! 201 3 , · , , , , , · , 9 , , · x , , , 10 16 , . , . · , ~~, , . : : Page ~ , , · · , , · , , , · , , , L , , , · . , , : · · , , , , , · , , , , , , , , , , · : , , , , , , , , , , , , , · · · , , , , , , , . , , , , · , · , , , , , , , · , · . I I I: 31: L-, i ! :---_._: : I I I I : , , · , : , · , , , , , 3 , , , 75;25 · , , , , r , , , , · , , , · · , , , · : , , · · , · , , , , : r · : , , , 11 ¡ -~ , , , Coast Redwood --------------------------------- Coast Redwood' --------------------------------- 159 160 5 = Worst = Best, 1 0123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino Vallco Residential Project 2005 Job Name: Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th +- , ~ PesUDisease Problems Recommend Status 1 ,I' I I I I I I , 1 I I , I I I I I , I 1 I , ,I I ú1: : :.-: ::: ~: : : u;:>: - : : :- _I I I ~1 u;:> I I..-JI M I I , - ..- I I I. W : : 0 - : \<t:T'" if) I I W ill I 1>- « : : a:: (j) : :0 >- w 1'-" w « -.,((I-=:,)- ('-. (fJ :;::-: I!{ : > ill u;>: W: ""w ;;::: '"'- w _ ..." 1 (j)' I ...... ..-. w o ~: S: 0 -~:!::::! : a: 0 W a::: _ ~ _, >- , ü 0 0::: I ~ I - W Ll): 0:«: 0::: a:: w:-:c a: 0::: ~ ~: 0:0: « <í I-:!X:Z ~ t- 0 _: 0 0: ill: :J 1 :J ~: UJ: W ...J ill W (/):0::: >:0: 0 0 ~:u..:~ <C l? r- 1-10 >I~I Ü 0 (J)'(J),::E > «Ow 0' I I I '0 0 W'W OIZ¡ J- I- 0'0' I- I- (/):W:«::::J: 0 0 w:wIO:2: OC 0 z!OC¡Wo!O:::! 0 0 w!w1~ ~ ill 0:: _,I-, ,I-, a:: 0::: Z,ZI I 0.. .... I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I :- ~-t--:- :- {-r I I I I I I 1 I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I .. " 1".... ..,... I I I I I ,I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 4- ...... .... l- I I I I I I I I , I I I' I I I I . I I I I I , . , , , . · , , T T T , , . · , , , , , · . . , . , · . , , , . · . . · . , , , . , , 0 t--I t , , 0 , , , o 0 , .......'..·..··T·..·..·' , , , L.....1.......t. , , , , , , o 0 . , , , , , , , . , , l , , , I I I I I I I I I , I , I I I ·····..··..T......T....·······...y.....··....T·' I I I I I ...........i.......\........\,......i=I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I o , , , o , , . , , l , . , , , , f , , . , , , . , , , , , , f , , · · , , · , , , , , , , , , , . , , , . , , , Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs I , , ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I ,I I' I I , I I I I I I I' I I , 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I , I : : : :0:: : : : : :- I- : : :~:: Iz: ::lO WI' 'NIN ' '0' f-I I"": ill : : : .........:..- : : _: I: :- LL : : I- 0 0 :(9:..}: :1-: <.9\ :>- N I , ill ill ~ 'z'- (9.(91«1 _'#'1- _ : : W I- I í:Õ: -: /1"\ Z: z: e::: : 0'\ ~: 0: - ..- I I LL « « ,I-I'-' Z-I_"O'~ 'w,Q: 100;::;:1 I ..::;: T""",...,...I Z 'z I Z I 0 '<;,f ,..::; I N «:::.0:::; _, -.... I _ «I L- I - 'I 0' 'ill' .0:::; - I a::: I L- I Z ,-, (J) 0 I 1- IA'., _ I ~\ ï:= I- ;-;:;', ill .- W' (J)' Z' ill I e::: 'l::;21r- I 1::::&'--- (J) ..~, ' <:( I - I - I , ~ ,(J) I (j) I I OC Z,....... ....J I I W c::( WI ill I a.. u...' I I'Y W"-' O'~O' .........1......... ¡Z' W ,>- I u.... ill __::>, I t- L.L.. I u... ill' I (9 I-:ø : ~ I- 0 I I- ~:o ~:~ ~:~,>:(j):Z ,. I r- .A" L- 0 _I"""" I I 'w' W I;:: I W I ~ ~ 0' u.... I I I 0' 'Z- «::: Ir- I (1"\ W ...J::::> I « I I I I....J I '¿':-.J I: I I ~ ~ a::: « 0:: Z: NO: 0 0: 0: ::2 : ro: ::::> ~:::::> ro:ro « w ~ ill I- 0:<:( o:::¡o::: ~:e::::w:«:e::: O:~ 0:0 0 I (j) I (j) ü:I O:ü 0:0:0::::0:a.. - - ----- I I' ,I I , I I I 6 ' , '70 25 3 1 I I I I I I I I 1: : : I :: :::::: -.--r r r-I I ,,-,- .- r r .- I' I I I' I I I I I , I I I I I' I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I ... ,... ...,.....,..,....... , I I ,I I I I I , I I 6: : \ 30: 15 3: 1 : :::::: . I- I- I- I- I- I- I- -I- , I' ,I I "",' , ,I I' , l' I I I I . I' I I I I I I 1 I I I I I" I" I" I" I" I" I" ;- 10! !! 45: 15 3! 1 ¡ !!!!!: ,orr r rrrrrr , I I I I I I I I . I I I , I I I I 1 I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I -p p" """"",," I I . I I I I I I I I I , 15: : : : 60125 3: 1 : :::::: I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- I- l- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I' I , I I I . 1 I . I I I I I I I ..·I..··..··.-·..··..'......·T.. I I I I ....J.......\.......1.......f......1......I. I I I I I I I I . , I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 20 ! ¡ ! 75! 30 2 ¡ 1 ........ ...............I.......T.....·T.....· ·......T...... I 1 " ' 1 I I 1 I 1 I " I , , , , 0 . , , , ---T---~---,·-- , , 0 , , , , , , , 0 . , , , , , , .--~----~---~--- , , , , , , , 0 , o 1 I 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 _____~----f---~---T------r---- , 1 I 1 1 1 . 0 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 I .1 1 1 1 1 I " I 1 1 I I -----~----~---~---~------~---- 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 , I I I 1 ___T____r___'----r---~----T--- 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 0 1 1 1 1 1 I I , I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I ---~----~---~----~---~----~--- 1 1 I , I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 12: ! ! ! :60!20 2:1: ! ____T---r---~----,---~---r--- ·---r---~----T---' , 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 ,I I I 0 11: : : : : 50: 30 3 1 1 1 : ----~--~---~----~---~---~--- ----~---~----~--- I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 0 0 1 1 I , I 1 I I I I I I 17 . 0 . , , , , , , ---T·---r---'-- , , . , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , ___J.____L.___~____, , , , : 1 : Page I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I _____~----r---~---,------r---- 1 I 0 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 _____~____~___~___J.______L____ I I I I I I 0 I 1 0 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I , I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I ___,-~.-I"'---'----r---~----T--- 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 ___J.____L___~____L___~___L___ 1 I I 1 , I 1 , I I I I I 0 I I I I 12 ¡ ! ! ! ! 55! 20 4! 1! ! _____T._~---~---.,---_r---r--- ____r___~----T--- o I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 23: : : : : 80130 2 1 2 1 : ----t--~---~----1---~---~--- ----~---1----t--- I 1 I 1 ,I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I . --- ~ BARRIE D. COATI and ASSOCIATES ¡'OOI31}1Q12 ~ ,~_."'., losGalos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 161 Coast Redwood ----------------------------- 162 Coast Redwood ----------------------------. 163 Coast Redwood ---------------------------- 164 Coast Redwood ---------------------------- 165 Coast Redwood .................. ---------------------------- 166 Coast Redwood ................. ---------------------------------1 167 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 168 Coast Redwood ---------------------------------' 169 Coast Redwood --------------------------------- , 170__ Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 5 = Worst = Best 1 Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 n:=ttp' AIIOt!st 9th. 2005 -t ! ~ -t I Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs Pest/Disease Problems Recommend Status -_.._-f--. I I I , I I I , , ,1 I I I I I I , I ' , , I I I I' 1 I I 1 I ,. I I I I I It' I' I I I ., I I , I I I I Iii i i i i ¡!!!! i ¡ ¡¡:¡! i ! _! ! i ¡ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I , I ~I..--. ' I I , , I I \_,' I I I' 1'1""""1"" I I I- I I I I ,0. I I , I ,_ _I I ..-1 ~ I 1-,' '" L- I I I I "I"""" I "I' 1 l() I' I , '-"1..- I I I. ~ .-, I I I ,,1..--.. 'Z' 'L-l I, ¡WI I I 0' I 1·c:(I~ BARRIE D COATE ill:::: : N: N : 0: :,- : :...... : UJ : :: : ill : : > : - . W I I I I 0 I -. 'I"""" 1_' I I I I --- I «' I I ~ I f/J ' 'o'~ L.L I I I I- 0 I (1"\ I I I L- I I ,,"\ I I >- I I I I u... I I I I I I I I W uJ I '-" I..q- (1"\ I .--- I I V I :þ: I I W I 1"--" ill I « _I I'Y I -...:::: I ('-- d ASSOCIATES ","" W 'z ~ ~ '" «' ,-, 'f- ' (J)' -' "', 'w ",' ~, "'" - W an _: : : ¡ill !-:f--« Lõ:- tr\ Z zJa:::Jc>~W:O:iV :_:LO: ': >0: {fJ ,:w:w:o:: ("-- w ...- I I I I LL «' I I 1-......... _ 0 I IS' Wi u- I 0 I 'I S, I - ...- 'N' 0:: lOW (401J) 353-1052 .q\:2::: IN ~:~ s:« z ~ z 1-1~:O':O:o .-: :s:>-: ü: 0 iE':::¡Jc:-o:: w g: . ¡ill: : : _: ~ _, a::: ~ z (/):: w: - L(): : : «: cr.:: cr.: ill: -: : a:: ~ 135355,mm,""" @:f-:: I © f-: (J) "ì I ~ z « ~ I fß «: z: w: go: ,,!.: ~: [3: ü I :5: :5 f-: t;:: z: D.. f- 0 ~' lœG,[o;,CA 95roO 0: :(J)>- : : : D:: æ: W S::J 0 a:: 0 I- er:: a:::: w: Z: m --I 0: 0: ill : ~: -' ~ \ w: w: -I w W WI I , 'W '0 ,,_ _ 0 .WI ¡\....I U)1a:::1~'0, 0, 0 >'LL,:2Ic:t fI"\ t- L- ,U) I . I L- I-- I :r: ,r- I- ~ ~ ~ ~' > I (J) I Z L-' Ü I I....... I I > I ,~ I > ~ Ü r- I 'I I I r- I « ~'Ü _ rY' I I w, _ r- I I 1..;5.... I 0 I () .. ,n I ..:: , « w ,_ I , I W :r:, r- I 0 ~ ' 0' 'z ü' '0 ' Z I I (/) I VI I 0 . 0 ~ W ,I-- I " I ill -":J~ I I --1' I ill I I I I- I I- 0' 01 I r- L- ~ I.-J: I: :r:: ~ S2 \ a::: «: a:: ZOO 0 0::2: OJ: :J W: ill : « : :J: 0: 0 : : 0 : :2: r- « ':::J I (]) I co I « WID... W I I- 0 I 0::: a:::: a::: D::: I ill I « 'a:: U) 0::: I ill I a::: I 0 I 0 ill I Ww I W I UI Wo: 0 Tree # Plant Name Õ ::2: 0: 0: _0 :r:: en J:: (f) o::c ü Ü ü 0: a::: 0 : 0.. Z: L- : 0 : 1--: n::: "" Wz: Z : D:: : 0:: I ~ . I I I I I I I 1 I 1'--" I I I.L- I I I LJ.... , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -1·: I I I I I I 171 Coast Redwood 13' . . , '60' 20 3' 1" ,,",' "", ,,' _________ _________________________________ ----I--4_---~----f----~---,--- ___,---~----I--- ---I----'---~----,---~----I--- -----~----I---4_---I------I---- ---1----,--"1---- ----'--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I , I ,I I I I I I ,I I I I I , I I I I ,I I , I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I 172 Coast Redwood 19: : : : : 70: 20 3: 1 1: : I : : :: ::::: ::: _________ _________________________________ ----:---¡---1----1----¡---~--- ---~---1----:--- ---1----r---1----~---_¡---:--- -----1----:----¡---1------~---- ---:----r---1---- ---->--- I I I I I I I I I I' I I ,I I I , . I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -¡ I I I' -::, I': I : : I I: : I I 173 Coast Redwood 12' , , , '65'10312' 1 I' 1 , I I 1 1 I I" _________ _________________________________ ____\__4_---~----I---4_---~--- ---f---~----I--- ---¡----~---~----I---,----,--- -----~----I---4_---I------I---- ---I----~---I---- -------- 1 , 1 1 ,I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 'I I" I I I I 1 1 1 , 1 I I I I 1 I' I , " 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I ,I I ,'I I ,I I' 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 , 1 1 I I 1 ,I" I 1 I I 1 ,I I I 1 174 Coast Redwood 6: : : : 140: 5 5: 1: I :::::: : I I :: ::: _________ _________________________________ ----:---r---1----1----r---~--- ----~---1----~--- ---1----r---1----~---_r---:--- -----1----:----r---1------:---- ---:----r---1---- -------- I I I I ,I 1 I' I' I 1 I' I' I 1 1 I 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 I' I I 1 I " ,I 1 I 1 1 I I ,_: , ,. I, ,I 1 I 1 -: I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 -: I I 175 Coast Redwood 19: : : : : 70: 20 3: 3:: :: 1 : :' ::::: : 1 : ,_________ _________________________________ ----;---:---1----1----:---:--- ----:---1----;--- ---;----:---1----:---:----\--- -----1----¡----:---;------¡---- ---1----:---1---- --------1 Nil I I 1 1 I' I ,I' 1 I' 1 1 1 1 I I' I I. 1 1 1 , I' 1 II'! 1 1 I ,I 1 1 1 ,I I I , __J_~?___ ç;_~?_~~~~5!~_~~_C!_______________ _~9_1__Jc___j____1___Jc~!J.L?_~ ~_l_2_j____l___ ___1____L___1____l___JL___1___ _____j____l___Jc___1______L____ ___1____L___1____ -------- I , 1 1 I I ,I I 1 I , I 1 I I 1 1 I I I' 1 , , I I I I I' I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 . 1 1 I 1 ,I 1 I' 'I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I . I I 1 1 I --: :, : I' I 1 I 1 ,I : I I' I 1 I I 177 Coast Redwood 13: : : : :45: 20 3: 1:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ _________________________________ ----¡---:---1----1----:---:--- ---r---l----¡--- ---I----:---1----r---:----;--- -----I----¡----:---I------r---- ---I----r---1---- --------1 1 , 1 1 ,I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I , 1 I I' I I , I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I ,I I I I I I I 178 Coast Redwood 14: : I : : 50115 2: 2:: ::: I :: 1: I 1: : I : ______.__ ______________________________.__ ----t--~---1----1---~---~--- ----~---~----t--- ---~----~---1----~---~-~-t--- -----1----t---~---t------~---- ---t---~---1---- ----~ 1 1 , I I' I 1 I I"'" I" I' I' 1 I I I , I I I I I I I I , ,I I I , I I I I I , , I .: ,I I I I I I I I I' "I' I "I 179 Coast Redwood 7: : : : : 45: 1 0 3: 3:: :::::: ::::: ::: _________ --------------------------------- ----¡--li---ì----l---li---r--- ----r---ì----¡--- ---¡----¡---l----r---li---¡--- -----ì----¡---li---l------¡---- ---¡----r---1---- --------1 , , , , ,I , I' 'I I I I' I I I I I I I I 180 Coast Redwood 12: : : : : 55: 20 5: 1: I :::::: 1: I :: I I : _________ _________________________________ ----t---t---1----i----t---~--- ~:--r---1----t--- ---t----~---~----r---1----t--- -----1----t----t---t------t---- ---t---~---1--- -------- : : : : :: ::: :::::: ::::: ::: Page 18 - . , -+- \ N Job Name: Vall co Residential Project. 10123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino 1 = Best, 5 = Worst , Job #: 08-05-158 ~ Date: August 9th, 2005 Status M , ::::. ~ ~ æ ('-- w o W 0::: - W r 0:: 0::: 0 D-rW -"Wr ..; (') ü > <{ W o r r ::;; ii: 0 W W 0::: 0:: I D- Recommend r , , , , , , , , , , , , , , f : , , , , , , , , , , , , íi) : I...J ~ : Ie( ........., I :> W : I 0 (/) , , <.( -:0::::2: w 1.i?:w:w ~ s: t:::!J a::: o 1X'_qQ 0:: w¡¡:::z :5 I-IOC:W -I :£:wJ:E o >: I..L..: :E o (/):(1):0 I- O!OwiU o WI I W o WI w: 0::: n::: Z:ZI Pest/Disease Problems -r , , : ~, U'), , , ,=-' o w 0:: w > o o 0:: S -' o o f- o o 0:: Ii. , , , , , , , , , -, I , 1.0, I , '1 I I T"""I I I _I I I , , , W, I , (I): : : ........, I I ......... I WI -, I II.['). ~: Lõ: ': 0' I IS' : ::s: >- -, ~' ,~ ¡('). 10' Ü~ I I I I :s:o:o:w , '~' 0 (/).0:::, I .....: u: : ~ U:wIO:z W:w:<C::J (/):o:::w:oc ~:I-:O:I- Pruning/Cabling Needs . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,- , '''' ' " I-! ::s I, : >- ,,,I ......., .........1..,..011- iJ.:¡:O!ä:: :>'w'O ': 0:_ O:WIO:::: Z'w:o.... wlZ:m , ,~ W:U)IZ >:w:z Ol--.J::J ~!~io:: w'ü'o.. 0::: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Measurements Condition -¡ "I f f I I I I 'I I I I' " , I t I I' I I I' I I I 'I I I I I I I " : : :8: :: I '1...-' I I ! ! ¡ N!N' ¡ !Z ~ '0 I I-I T""" I ,0 ~ 01 'I rl"¡" , I;:::: W I W I I.......' "1" (9' ,.--- uJ W: I- : .-: Z: -- : c:> : « I..L.. 1-:< :~:~:c:> ~:Z)O:: c:> «'2 1T"""1«'2 Z'Z- 0 Z N 2:- :_1 :- «: 1-- © ~lrl~iW O::::r Wi~ ~ ~ (1)1(1) "(( z,<C --.JII W « ,0::: wlw :s:~ 0:0::: ü:1- 0::::10::: i~ rlO Iir ~IO ~i~ ~i~ iW.--- I:<C 1-10 _0:0::: : I ,W -.JI I I X:2 º:o:: «:~ z:~ 0:0 0:0 m:~ w:~ W:r o:~ ~:~ ~:~ 0:0 I:W I:W O:I 0:0 0:0 , , , , , , , , , , I . , , i , I , , , r' wi wi "-' , N' -' ~' .,q.::2 @):~ ~1(1) w:>- r'~ w' , :2 n= «:....J _:=:J 0::::2: --1--~--- ~ BARRIE D. COATI and ASSOCIA US 1'00)35),1052 ~ ""'-". LœGalos,CA 95030 --I , , , , , , ---j---+---j----.---- , , , 1 .1 1 ! ! 1 - , , , , , , , , , ___._R_~___~__R_ . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---f----}----~----I , , . , , , , , , 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I -----~----t---+---j------t---- I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 H____~____.___~___.______·____ 1 1 '1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 --I , , , , , , , , , --_.----~---~----þ---~ , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , ---T----r---'----þ--R- , , , , , , , , , - -I , , , , , , , , , ---t---~---~----þ---~ , , , , , , I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ____H1____~---~---~------~-H-- 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I t 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I -----~----.---~---.------.---- I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I -----'----r---ir---,------r---- I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I -----~---_.---~--_.-----_.---- I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I ---j----r---j----t---~----j--- I I I I I I I I I I I I t 1 ! ! 1 t I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ---+----~---~----.---~---.--- I I I I . I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I ---t----}----1----~---4_---t--- I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 t I 1 I I 3 I 1 I I ---~---~----~--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 : 2: : ----~---~----.--- , , , , , , , , , 11: : : : :50: 25 ____j--+---~----j---+---f--- I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 . I 1 I 1 I I 14: : : : 140:20 ---+--~---~----~---~---.--- 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I m o Plant Name Tree # Coast Redwood --------------------------------- 181 --------- 2: 3: : ----f---~----t--- , , , , , , , , , 1 1 I 1 I I I , I 1 I I I I I t I 1 ---.----~---~----.---~---_.--- 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 , . , 2: 41 : ----~---~---_.--- , , , , , , , , , 14: : : : : 35: 25 .---+--~---1----~---~---~---, t I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 161: : : :35130 ----.--~---~----~---~---.--- I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I tali an Stone Pine ------------------- Pinus pinea 182 --------- talian Stone Pine ------------------- 183 --------- I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 ---,----~---'----r---,_---r--- I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I --_._---~---~----.---~--_.--- I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I talian Stone Pine --------------------------------- 184 -.-------- 2! 4! : ----r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 2: 4: : ----~---~---_.--- , , , , , , , , , 9: : ! ¡ : 35: 30 ----r---rR--,----,----r---r--- I I I I I I I I I I I . 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 11:: : : :40:30 ____.__~RR_~____.___~___~___ I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 ___~~?___.!?!~~~_~~~~5ò~~~~______________ , , , , , , , , , ---,----r---,---- ----~--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---~---~--_._--- -------- I I 1 . . , , , , , I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I -----'----r----r---,------r---- I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I -----~---_._--~--_._----_._--- I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 , 1 , I I ---,----~---'----r---'----r--- I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 . I 2! 4! : ---r---'----r--- , , , , , . , , , 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I --_._---~---~---_.---~---~--- I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I . . , 2: 4: : --_._--~----~--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , ---,----r---,----.---~---- , , , , , . , , , I I I , I I I I 1 I I I -----'----r----r---,------r---- 1 I I I I I I 1 , I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I --- ----r---'----r---'----r--- I I I I 1 I 1 I , 1 I I 2 ¡ 2! : ---r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ..... ·1·....' ·t.. .....¡...... .-........'---- : : ! Page 19 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I ............~.......I........I....................I.. I , I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I , , , I I I I , I 1 I I .......J._......I........L.......~. , I I I I , , I , I I , , , 2: 4: : ---_._--~---_.--- , , , , , , , , , 12: ! ! ! : 35: 25 ----,---r---,----,----r---r-·- 1 , I I , I I I I I , I I , , I I , , I , 13: : : : :35\30 ----~--~---~----~---~--_._-- I I 1 , I I I I I I , , I I I , 16: : ! ! :40:20 ----r---r---,----,----r---r--- 1 I 1 I 1 I , , , , I I 1 , I I 1 , . I 1 I I 14: : : : : 40: 25 ----~--~---~---_._-~~---~--- I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I . 1 , I I 1 talian Stone Pine ~-------------------------------- 186 --------- talian Stone Pine --------------------------------- 187 --------- talian Stone Pine --------------------------------- 188 --------- talian Stone Pine --------------~------------------ talian Stone Pine --------------------------------- 189 --------- 190 5 = Worst = Best 1 -\:- \ - Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino ~ Job #: 08-05-158 ~ Date: August 9th, 2005 Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs ¡- I I' 1 1 I I I I , I I I I ' " I ' I I , I I I I I I I : : :0': I 1 ,...-1 I I I I I .-- Z : : :N:N 0 ~ , '0 ,-,..- I I 1-0' '(9" ¡::: (9 ! ill W ¡ ~ .-.! z! ~ <.9 (9 <{ -~ 'It I 1 ~I-I« 1.01L.'(9ZZO:::c.9 0 :: « I 2 ...: : 4: : z Z z"' 0 I Z I W I : : N ~ _ -¡ a::: -.« : I-- - 0 0 : : @;= I- \ ûì: w: : I- w ~: U) <!2 z W 1 I (/)(/) IIO::IZ'ê2~I'W«WW : : a::: w W ~:::>: 0: () 1-: a::: a::: Z : : :W I- 0 I:I--:~:O ~ ~:~ ~ ~ U) : : :I-w I « I--:o:-o:a::: : ow I I I ill ...J.:J' 1« I .....I : :x::2 52 0::: «:cr::Z:N 0 0:0 01~ ro : :(1):« W CL W:I-:O:« a::: D:::D:: O::::W « : :O:õ I (/) I:(/):ü:I U U:U ü:a::: ü , ' " , .......¡......·..!........~...·..·t.. I I I I I I , I I , I I . I I I I , I I I I I I I .........1.......·'·..····...·· I I I I I , I I I ¡ ¡ i , , , , , , , , , .......,........,........... , , , , , , , , , Status '7 :::. ~ ~ æ ('-. w o w cc - W l- e:: CC 0 Il. I- w --' w r <t <.9 Ü > « w o I- I- ::< ¡¡:: 0 w w CC e:: I D- -I PestlDisease Problems Recommend I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I '" I , I I I ," ! lÜ! ! !.-': !! I I I I . I l()1.-.. I I ::s: : : ~: ~ : : I , I I 1 _'....- I ,..... :w: J : 0: - : j« ,(f), , I W' W I I> : «: : : a::: (J) : : 0 : w: _: í!): W « LÕ: 0::: :E :~:L(): ': > ~ ,:w1w , 0' I I:='" 0 - S' N a:: .-.: : s: >-: ü 0 æ::::ï '~I 1.........1 "" "" 1 _ C lC)1 101-"'" LL LL WI~ Z ~I :o:ü: « <Í r-:e::: __I 01 01 W 1 ~ ~ <:( 1 W W , , '01 ....... ....... >1 -== (j):a::S: : 0 0 >:LL oc:::; t;:ü: ::::L: () () (j):lj) :1:, w:w:O:z: I- I- 0:0 0: WIW'~I~1 0 0 W1W 01 z!a:!~!a::! 0 0 w!w ~: _I~I Ir-, et::: et::: "7IZ 1 , , , , , ....·..I....·..~· , , , , , ' f f 1 ¡ i 1 , 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 .¡-.......¡........¡.......+...........+. 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 , !! ! ûì , ~ >- I::: cc º cc D- <.9 z Z :::J cc D- 2: 2: : ----f---i----f--- , , , , , , I (]) o 17: : : : : 40: 30 ____I__-f___i____j___-f___f___ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 , 1 i i , , , 1-: w: wi u-' , N' -' ~' ..;f!~ tA\:w "",I- 0.:::(1) w:>- r'U) w' , 2:¡:: «I--.J -:~ 0(2 -I , , , , , , ................. , , , , , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I .....1....-.··1........··..·..··..·· 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 , , , 2: 2: : ----~---~----.--- , , , , , , , , , 1 1 I 1 1 1 17: : : : : 40\ 25 ---.--~---~-~--..---~---~--- 1 1 1 1 I , 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 --I , , , , , , .....·"t···....T· , , , , , , , , , , , , ·..···T..··....·..T· , , , , , , 3: 3: : ----~---~----~--- , , , , , , ! ! r -I , , , , , , .......1.......·· , , , , , , , , , ·.........t· , , 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ................1........1........- 1 , I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , I , , , 2 I 2: : ----~---~---_.--- , , , , , , , , , -I -I , , , , , , ...·..·r.......T·' , , , , , , , , , , , , ......,1.......... , , , , , , , 1 1 1 I 1 1 . 1 1 ...........}.......¡........:.......}...........}. , 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I , 1 1 1 1 ............1........1........1........1......·....··· 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 . 1 1 1 1 .......}.......:........:.......}.. 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I . 1 I 1 1 . 1 I I 1 , 1 1 1 I ...............1.......,1..·....··· 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 13! ! ! ! : 15: 10 _~__T__~---,----~-~-~---r-_- 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 r 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 _l~_l__JL___J____l___JL~~_t?_~I__~_t_~_J____t___ I 1 1 , I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I' 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 4! 3 ¡ ! ·---r---'----T-~- , , , , , , ! ' J 18: x: 12: : :50:40 ----f--~---~----1---~---~--- 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 , I 1 I 1 1 1 I 12: : : : :35: 15 ----.--~---~---_..---~---~--- 1 1 , 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 I ~ BARR" D. CO'11 and ASSOCIATES (400)35J.1052 ~ =,,_... Los Gatos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 191 Italian Stone Pine --------------------------------- 192 Italian Stone Pine -------------------------------~- 193 ~?!'_~EO~~Y_~J!'_~_________________ Pinus radiata - 194 talian Stone Pine .------------------- - 195 talian Stone Pine .------------------- - 196 talian Stone Pine _1',-,-,,- -- I I , , , , , , ...·...r··.....T·' , , , , , , , , , , , , ......,1............ , , , , , , , I 1 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 ·..··T·....··I..·....·r....···T...·..·....T· , I 1 1 I 1 . I 1 1 , , 1 I I : , ....... : , , , , , " , ........1........1.....··.... , , , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' .......,.. .....,... , ' , ' :.. ~ , " , " 1 _ 1 1 .........1.......,1...........· , " , " , " 23! ! ¡ ! ¡ 45: 30 2 ¡ 2! ! ____T__~---'----T---~---r--- ----r---'---~,--- 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , , 1 ,I 'I 1 17 ¡ ! ! ! ! 40! 35 2! 3! ! ~--~._-~---~---_.._--~---~--- ----~---~---_..._-- I 1 I 1 ,I 1 I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 ,I I 1 I 1 1 1 I ,I 1 197 Italian Stone Pine -------------------- 198 Italian Stone Pine , , , , , , ___~~---~---4----1 ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ___l____L___l___J ! ! ! Page 20 ~ - 1 1 1 , 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I _____,----,~~-~---,------r---- I 1 1 1 1 1 I' I 1 1 1 1 ' 1 I I 1 , , 1 I' 1 I 1 1 I 1 -----~----,.---~---,.-----_.._--- I 1 1 1 , 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 ' 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 __.,----,---,----,---'----T--- 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 , I 1 I 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 ---,.----~---~----~---~---_..._-- 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I , 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 1 2! 4 ¡ ! --~-r---'-~--,--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 3: 3: : ----~---~---_.I._-- , , , , , , , , , 19: ! ! ! : 50: 40 ____T__~---'----T---~---r--- I 1 , 1 I 1 1 I , 1 I . I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 20: : : : : 55: 40 ____...__~___~____.L___~___~___ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I , 1 . I 1 . 1 1 -- 199 ~?!!~EO~~Y_~J!'_~_________________ , 200 ~?!!~EO~~Y_~J!'_~_________________ 5 = Worst = Best, 1 4=- 1 - Job Name: Valleo Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino IV ~ Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 PestlDisease Problems Recommend Status . "I I I I r I J I I I . I , I' I I I -..' I I I I I I lO; : : _: ::: 'I , I I,[) , -. I I , .,-1 I , 'I lO I I 1_ --: 1 : SI ~ : :..J C? w: : : 0 - : : c:{ ~ (/)1 I W Ul I ,>- «: : : 0:: ({) : '0 >- W I I --, W «,.-..' 0:: -=::".- ('" (j) : _: I.!(: > uJ I.C): ..::: - W -ILOI.,-I 0 U) 'oW w a:: ('-. W o : ~: -' Ü -o:s:!::::! a:: 0 W a:: _ ~ I _, >- 0::: ' -I - W 1.0: :0:« 0:: 0::: w:- a a:: 0::: .- ~: :0:0 <í <í ......:...... Z D- t- 0 _I 0 I 'w .-J ...J:c:( ,0::: W ...J ill W (f)'rvIO'O ~I --I :>'w -== _ I- 1u....1>' Q'o>'u..":::;-(9 t-:O:>:~ C): 0 (f):(f) :;: > <C Üill ü' '0' , '0 0 w:w: :z 1-: I- 0:0 t: - (j),WI«I::) 0.0 w'LU u :æ: 0:: 0 z:O::¡Wo:a::: 0: 0 w:w ~ !t! w 0:: :1-::1- n:::O:::z:zI.r..I.r..IQ.. I I I I' LJ I I I I I I I , I I I ' -----~----f---4_---¡------f---- ---¡----~---1---- ---- I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I. I I I , I I I I I I ~-_.-~----~---~..-~---_.-.---- --_.---~---~---- ----, , I I' I I' I I I I 'I I I I I I I 'I I : I I I I I I I I -----~-·--f--·4i---t------~·--- , I 'I I , I I' I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I -----~----~---~---~-_.---~---- I , 1 1 1 1 , 'I I 1 1 1 1 I I Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs 1 1 1 1 1 I J I 1 ,I I 1 I , I , 'J '1 I I , I I I ," 1 , I I' '" 1 1 I " "I 1 , 1 1 I'" l :0: :::: -- , '..-' 1 1 Ill{) : :': _ : : Z: : I- ' : :~I ~ I :O::I ::.. I I (I')' 1 1-- J 1 (I') >- 1 1 '-' '¢ (9 1 I I '-' ::u: : _: z -- (9: «: : ~- !:: ,l{)I-1- (9 Z Z'~I(91 0 æ : ~: « Z Z z·: 0: Z: I W 0 :--:~ _ « :1-:-:010- ~:w:~ I- w ~:W:~:Z:w ~ ~:æ:Z ~ ~ I:W:«:w:w ~ _:~:º 0 1-:~:œ:w:Z:(9 I,I-'I- 0 ~ ~,~,~,>,(f),Z I-:ü:-o,æ :: :o:w:-Z ~,::¡, I « I' 1 I ~ 1 «:~:Z:N 0 O:O:O:~:ro:~ w:I-:O:« œ æ:æ:œ:w:<t:œ I:Ø:O:I OIO:U:O:~:ü:~ 1 , 1 I , , , , . , I , 1 I , , , , ---,----~---~----f---~----¡--- 1 , 1 , 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I , , , , , , , , , 1 , , I , 1 I I 1 I , 1 1 ~__4__~_~___~____~___~___+~__ , , , , , , I I 1 I , I , , I , I , r : I- 0 0 ill W W WI-I- "- <C <C N ::;¡; ~ """ - I- "" I- (f) n:: ~ w ill I- 0 I-I<C ill W I ::;¡; <2 0:: CD:<t w ~ 0:6 I ø Measurements .....,- , , , : , , , I- ' W : ill : "- ' '" ~ ...t1:2 ",,'ill ~:I- œ:(J) w:>- I-,(f) W' , ,- ~,I- .,::::. '---1 J: «:::J CD ë5!~ 0 ------ 1 : 2: : ---~---~----f--- , , , ~ ' , 1 : 4: ! ---~---~----+--- , , , , , , , , , I - --I , , , , , , , , , ---'----r---'----..----:-' , , , , , , I I 1 _ , , , , .....+.....+ ~I , , , , I , 1 1 , I , 1 I I 1 , , , I -----'----r---~---T------r---- 1 , I 1 , 1 I 1 I , I 1 I 1 I , , 1 , I , 1 " 1 , I " , ...........""................1.......""...........""· , , I 1 . , 1 'I I , , " 1 , , , 1 I I , , , I , , ---{----~---i----~-~-~--~-f--- , I , , , , , , 1 I , , I , , I , 1 , I , I , , , , 1 , , , 1 1 I I I , ___4____~___~____~___~____+__~ I . . I I I , I I , , , , , , , , , I I I I I 1 I I , 1 I I I , 1 , 1 1 , 1 I , I , ·---'----r---'----r---'--~-,--- 1 , 1 , I I I 1 I , I I , , 1 1 1 1 - - , " , " ", " .......,,". .........+. , " , " , " -I , , , , , , ....··.....··..·T· , , , , , , I , . 1 , I , 1 I I , , " , ·....·..T..·....'·.....··'··....·T....·......'· , I I' , I , 1 1 , 1 , I I , 1 , I , , , , 1 , , 1 I ·..··..T·......'·.....·,......·,· , I 1 1 , , , , , , , , -- , , : : ......-'.......J................. , , , , , , , , 1 " 1 I " , I " , .......1........1......................... , I' I , I' , I I' , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , I , , I , . . I 1 I , , -----I........'........L........... 1 , , , I 1 , I , I I , -I , , , , , , ..·..·'..···..T.. , , , , , , , , , , , , ......-'.......1............. , , , : : ~ Page 21 , , 'I , 1 I " , I , " , ...........,.......·'....··..I·.....·T··...···..·T· , I " 1 , , 'I I I I I' , , , , ..,.- , , , , 1 I , , I 1 I , , , , ·.....·,.....·..,··..··..'......·T· I 1 1 1 1 , I , 1 1 , I , , , , , , .......J................ , , , , , , , , , ............ , , , , , , 1.---. : , I 1 I I 1 , I I , 1 1 1 .......J........I........L.......J.. I , I I I I I . , I I I 20 ¡ : i ¡ ! 25 ¡ 40 1! 2 ¡ ¡ ----T--~---,----,---~---r--- ---r---'----r--- , I I , " I" I , , I I I I I I I , , I 'I I' I 1 I I , 'I I 1 , 15: : : : : 30: 25 1: 2: : ____1.__~___~____~___~___~___ ____~___~____1.___ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I . I I I I 201X:16!10: :30:351:3: ¡ ____T__~---,----,----r---r--- ----r---'----r--~ I I , I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I' 'I I I I I , I I I' I 21: : : : : 30: 25 1: 3: : ____1.__~___~____~___~___L___ ____~___~____1.___ I I , I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I' I I I -- -- - ~ 'AROED.com and ASSOClA US (4oa) 35J.1052 ~ .,,~."'. losG.l.los,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 201 Italian Stone Pine --------------------- 202 Italian Stone Pine --------------------- 203 Italian Stone Pine --------------------- - 204 tali an Stone Pine .-------------------. - 205 talian Stone Pine .-- -- - -- --- --------- - 206 talian Stone Pine .------------------- - 207 talian Stone Pine ._-----------~------ - 208 talian Stone Pine 18: : : : : 40: 40 ---f--~---~----1----~---f--- I I I I I I , , : : I , I J 1 , I I 17: : : : : 30: 30 ---+--~---~----~---~---~~-- I , I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I , , , , , , , , , ---'----r-~-'---- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---.----~--_..----I , , , , , . , , , 1 I 2 I I ----~---~----f--- , , , , , , , ! I . , , 1 : 3: : ----~---~----+--- , , , , , , , , , 10: : : : : 30: 25 ·---f--~---~----i---~---~--- , I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I , I I , I I I I 15: : : : : 25: 25 ----~--~---~----~---~---~--- I I I I , 1 I 1 , I I I I , I I , I 3 ¡ 2 i : ----r---'----~--- , , , , , , I I J 1 ! 4 ¡ ! ----~---~----~--- , , , , , , , , , 22! ! i ! ! 30! 30 ----T---r---'----T----r---r--- I I I I , I r I , I I . I I I , I I 1 1 I I I 15: x: 14: 10: 130135 ____1._______~____~________~___ I , I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I --- ~~~~~~_~~~~_e:!:~~~______________ talian Stone Pine 209 210 5 = Worst = Best Wolfe Road, Cupertino 0123 N Job Name: Valico Residential Project Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 +- " ~ OÇJ Recommend , , , , , , , , - ' (f) , , ' ~ ' - ' , w : . (f) , , <.( .--.' a::: ' W l!{! w i ~ ........., N o a: :J 0:: W - :5 f- b.:: -' ::¡; W' o > LL: U (f) en: I- 0 0: o w W: o ill WI a:::: Z Z: , , , , ·...··1..·..··}· · , , , , , , . , , , , ................... , , , , · , , . , . , , .......y........... , , , , , , , , , . , . .................... , , , , · , Status ;;:¡ , :s ~ ~ it: ('-. w o w 0::: - W f- a:: 0::: 0 c.. f- W ...J W f- <tt9ü > « W o f- f- :;: õ2 0 W W 0::: a:: I D.. , , , , , , , , , : , , , , , : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . . , , , , .J :( > :;¡ :< JJ :t:: :¡ z W :;: :;: o u w a:: - PesUDisease Problems --,- , , : -, (f)' i:,.: o w 0:: W > o Ü 0:: :5 -' a ü f- a a 0:: : , , ............-- , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I " I ···........t...·... :........:... ,.. ·t.....·.....¡-----i I I I I I I I I I I 1 : r f :.-.: ! : : ur! : : :........., I : .-. : I : w] : : : w: : : :<C: '.-.: 'w: : 1.0' 1(/),_, ,I :-: Lí(: 0: : 0 I T""" I >-' I I_I : lÕ:~:O:«: 1 I $:'0: ü. ~'O: I WI --I 10' 0' (fJ1......., >' I LL I> I I 1--: 0, :~: ü:w:o:z: w:w:<{,=>: (/)'o:::w:o::, ~!I-:O:I-: I <D o : , : , , , f-: W: W: LL: N' -' ~, ..J.::2: A':W ""',f- 0:::(1) w:>- f-,(fJ w' , :2:n:: «I...J -:=> 0:2 2: 3: : ----f---~----f--- , . , , , , , 29: : : : : 30: 35 ----f--"'---~----j---"'---f--- I I I I I I I I I , I I , , , 2: 2: : ---~._-~----~--- , , , , , , , , , , I I 1 I I 12: : : : :25: 15 ---+-------~----~--------~--- I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I ...........1'.......,........,.......y...........'". , , , , I , I ,. , , I " , , , , 'T' , : , , , ·.....·r· · , , - - , , " , , , , I , , , , I , .....................'........1...................·....· , 1 , . , , , I , 1 , I " , j , , · , , , .....···'·......T.. , , , , , , , , , , , , ..................... · . · . , , I " , , 'I , , 'I , ·..··......T..·....¡·.....··'·....··T·..·.......T.. , , , I , , , , , , , , I , 1 , I , , I , 1 1 , 1 , , " , ............1........1........1......................... , " , " , " , , , , , , , , , , , , .................'........1...·..·...· I I , I , I . , , , I , I I 1 I , , . , , , , , , , I I ·......t..··..·¡..·....·t.....··t..··..·¡...·....H , . , I , , I I , , , , I 1 1 , , , I , , , 1 , ........I........,........¡,........I.. , , , , , , , , , , , , 2: 2: : ---f---~----f--- , , , , , , , , I , , , 1 : 3: : -~~~---~----...--- . , , , , , , , , 23 ¡ x ¡ 18 ¡ ¡ ! 25 ¡ 50 1 ¡ 4! ! ----T.~_r---,~~--~---_r---r--- ---r---'----T--- , 1 I , ,. I" I I I . .. ,.. , I , , . .. I , . , . 'I . 1 1 8: : : : : 30: 10 3: 1: : ---_..._-~---~----.¡,---~---~--- _.-~---~---_.I._-- I , , . .. I" 1 . 1 , " I" , 1 1 , .. I" , , , , , , ·..........···..T· , , · , .:........:.. · , , , , . ..........1.. , , , , , , , . . . , · , . 1 , , 1 . . I ..........·T....·..I....·..·'..·....~··..··....·T· I 1 I , I · . . , I I . .. . , . , " , , , , ........................... , , , , , , , , . , . , , , , .......·.····..·T.. , , , , , .:.. , . , ..I...........................~_. , , : ~ Page 22 · . " . , . . . . · . " . .....·..·..T...··..'·.....····.....,.·..........T· · 1 . . , I I , . 1 ---:.. I . ---:.. ...:.. , " , " , " ................ .......I.. ....1.. , ., , " , ,. " 1 1 , I 1 I . I I . , I ..·....T.....··.·.......,··..·..,... , . I I · . I . I , .:.........:.. , , , , , , .L........I.. . , , , , , 3 ¡ 3! ¡ ----r~--'----T--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 3: 2: : ----~---~---_.I._-- , , , , , , , , , Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs j" I I' I t I I I' I I , .. I 1 1 1 I' I 1 I I " I 1 I , " I I I . I 1 I I , : :: : ô:: -- , I I I ~I' l!) ! ! ¡ !rZJ:Ñ' ¡ z .- ~ I , 0 ' . -I ~ . º I --- : f-w o:w : :c:>:.,J. m\ .- (9 - >- , Wi...... I 'Zl-..- '-.11(9 <C w............ : LLw ...... ~ :~:-:rr\ Z Z ~ <.9 > 0 Ñ . «....... ",t-I'-.I--O >W~ I N 00::::::2: : ~: <C: ~ Z« z': L- ~ 0' 0 0 ~ - I I~' Z'~ (fJ - @ ~ I- Lõ': w: u...:...... W _: (f) 1- Z w a::: I (f) ø '1a:::IZI~ ~ I,WI<C W W Q : a::: w W S:~:O: 0 1-:0::::0::: w Z ~ : ~ f- 0 I:f-:~:O ~ ~:~:~ > (fJ Z , ~ « L-'Ü'-'rv 'I W , WI W ~1~10·u... ,. 0 Z- , C) -.J' --' ' I « " -.J :X 2 _10::: <C:a::::Z:N 0 0:0:0 2 m ~ :m <C W1Q w:I-:O:<c a::: a::::a::::a:::1w:<c a::: :0 0 I:W I:W:O:X 0 O:O:O:a::::O Q , , I . 1 , I I 1 1 1 . ....·..}......·:·.......)···..··}··.....I·....·..: · , 1 , I I , . . I 1 I · , 1 . 1 , · I . I . . I 1 . I I . I ----:........:........~.......¡.......:......··:--I 1 I . , . , I 1 I I , . · , I . I 1 13: : : : : 25: 20 ·---f--~---~----i--~~---~--- · . . I 1 , I I , . . I I , , , I I I I . , . 26: : : : : 20: 40 ----...--~---~~~--.¡,---~---~--- 1 I I I 1 I I I I , I I 1 I I , I , , , ............... , , , I I , , , , I , 1 I . I ..·····,···....·,·........···....T.. , , I . I . , , , I I , I , , , I . . I , . , . .......J..........................I.. · 1 I , , . I , · , I , 11 ¡ ¡ : : :30! 10 3: 1! ¡ ----T--~---,----~---~---r--· ----r---'---~T--- I 1 I I ,. I" , , I , .. ,., I . I , " ". · , . , . I . ,. . 11: : : : : 15: 15 2: 2: : ---_...~-~---~~._-.¡,---~---~--- ---~~--~---_.I._-~ I . I , I t I" , I I I 'I '" , I , , " ,.. 19! : ! ! ! 30: 30 ----T--~---,----~---~---r-~- · 1 I , , , , , , . , I I , . I , I I . I I 1 I 22: : : : : 30: 25 ---_.I.~-~---~----.¡,---~---~--~ I , . , . I I . . I I , I I I , I I ----1-- --' I I ~ BARRIE D. com and ASSOCIATES (400)353·1052 ~ ",,-.. losGalos,CA 9sæo Tree # Plant Name 211 Italian Stone Pine ................. ---------------------------------' 212 ~~!e_~[~_~______________________ .................. Lindendron tuliDifera 213 ~~!e_~[~_~______________________ .................. 214 Italian Stone Pine ................. _____M____________________M______ 215 Italian Stone Pine .................. _____M___________________________ ,................. 216 Coast Redwood .................. -~------------------------------- 217 Coast Redwood .................. --------------------------------- ..3.~º.... r::1.?n.~~E~Y_~J:'_~_________________. 219 Italian Stone Pine --------------------------------- - 220 Italian Stone Pine -------------------------------~- 5 = Worst = Best Job Name: Vallco Residential Project. 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th. 2005 --k I - ~ Status '? ::. >- ,> t: w " ('-, w OWn:: - W 0- 0:: n:: 0 a.. 0- W --' W 0- « <.9 u > « W 00-0- :;;: ¡¡: 0 W W n:: 0:: I CL Recommend :- , , , , , , , : , , , , j , , , , , , , , , , , , [Ô] : !...J ...!-' : I « -I ' :> LU : '0 (IJ , , « LûIO::!:2 w ': WdlJ ~ s:t::!:c:: o O:::...J:o a:.:: w:i=:z :S }-- I 0::: uJ -.J g;: w: ~ o >:I.L..:~ o U)I{J):O I- o:@:u o w: w: w o w:z'o:: a:.:: 2,_1 , , . ........i··...··~· · , , . , ' -1 , . , , , , ................... , , , . · , PestlDisease Problems L " I I I I I I I I I _, I I I LO: \ : ..-.: I I I . 1.01 ...-, . I " _. I I ..-1 ill: : : D': (/) : : : LU: <c: : : œ:: w: : G): WJ ~:í!):,:>1 O' I IS' 0 __ ::=.:>-: 0 LO:~:O:<C: a:: . , :>: I '0 I « ~'o'O'w' --' -: :0: ....J (/)1Íì:1>'o 0 I-¡O!>¡~ 0 Ü'W,OIZ I- w:w:<c1::> 0 (/):0:::: w:0:: 0 ~:I-:O:I-- 0:: - , , , . , , ...........1.. ,\.......1.......·..·1.. I I I , I I I I I I I , - . I I' I I I I I I I I ............... .,........................, I I I I I I I I I I I I Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs I I' I I I I I I I 1 I " I I I I I I' I , I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I' I I I I , I' I I' I : :8: : :: : I 1...-1 I I I I , I I I I Z" I : :N:Ñ : 0: :1- : I ._,....... I _' I I I : : C):"';' c.9: I- : I <.9 :tt: : .-.: z: - : <.9 I <C: ~- : ,LO'-o-'<.9 2IZ,O::'(9 0, :~:<C:z ~:~JO:z , w: :_:~:_ <C: :1-:- 0 0: ~'WI~II- W Z'(f),(f) Z w' "" I I 1« - I I - I IIOC'Z'~ ~ I WI~ W'W' S:~:O\~ ü r OC:OC :Z: I:O-:~:O ~ ~ ~I~ ~:(f): r:ü:-o:~ : OIW: ~I:J' 1« I I~I ~:oc:Z:N 0 0 010 ~:ro: W:r:O:~ oc oc oc:oc W:«: x:w:O:I 0 ü O:O,OC:O: , , , , , ., ......{......... .......~.......}.. I I I I I I I I I I I , . I I I I I I I I I I I I ................,................... I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ~ BARR" o. com and ASSOCIATES (4081353·1052 ~ ""'~.". losGatos,CA !i5030 Tree # Plant Name 221 Italian Stone Pine ------~-----------~--------_. 222 italian Stone Pine ---------------------------- 223 Shamel Ash ~-----~-----------------~--- 224 Shamel Ash ~-----~--~--------------~-------- 225 Shamei Ash ----------.-----------.---------. ~ Coast Redwood -~-_.----------_.------------_.-- 227 ç:-~?_~~~~~~-~~~--------------- - 228 Coast Redwood ----------~---~---------------~-- co , ~ >- !::: n:: o ¡¡: CL <.9 Z Z :J 0:: CL 3: 3: : .---,---1----,--- , , , , . , Measurements · ' ' , ' , , ' , , , ' , ' , , ' ' , ' , , ' , , , ' , , , , ' , · , ' , , ' ! 1 r- o! 0 : :W w:~ · I ~ r '« ::2: : : « : :'2 : :N ~:_ ..1J, I~' -, r r-: :~ r-:w w, I~ (I),w >- I I u.. w, ''': I :w --IO I I Ir- I'« : : :w Iw : I: :r:::2: S2: 0:: :00:00:« w:o.. :0:0:0 IIUJ 22 : 1 I :30130 _____ +---1---+--+--+-- 1 I I I I I I I I I , , , , : : , 0-: w' W: "-: "': -, ~, , " "'", ©>!' , n::, wi 0- 'v, , , w,- 2:~ «::J o!~ L ¡-- , , . 2: 2: : ----~---..----I.--_. . , , , , , , , . I I I I I I 29: : : : : 30: 40 ----..--~---~----..---~---..--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----:---' · , , , · , ·......·....···..T· , . · , , , , , . , . , · , . ---.,----I---_..I----I , , , · , . , . , I I I I I I I I I I }.......:........:.......}...........}. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----~-~--+---~---..I-----_I.----- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .......~.......-.:........:.......}. I I I I I I I , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --~.,---_..---~----~---~~---.,--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , 1 1 2: : ___,___1____,___ , . , , , . I ! ! , , , 2: 1: : ---~---~----..--- , , , , , , , ' , 10: : \ : : 351 30 ----+--~---~----~---~---~--- I . I I . I I I I I 1 I I , I , I I 9! ! ! ¡ :25: 15 --~-+--~---~---_..-_.~---+--- I I I I , I I I I I I I I I . I , I -1 , . , · , . ---~---~--_~_---I , , , , . , , . , · . . , . , · , , , , , · . . · , . , , , , , , , , , ~ , , . , . . , , , · , , --_..--~-I-_-_..----I · , , , . . · . . , , . , , . , : , , · , , I I I I , I I I I I I I T T T T I I I I I I I I I I I I . . . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _____~___~L____I_~__..______L_~__ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _____'----r---~---T------r---- , I I I I I I I I I I , I' I " " "" ... I I I I I . I " I I I I I I I.- L L I._ l- I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I , , . ~ , , , ! . I I . , : I I I I I : I I I , . ___T____~---'----r---,----T--- I I I I I I I I I I . I II :.. :.. :.. I :. I I I I I I I I I I I I I.- L I.- L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , , ~ , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ___..____~___..____L___~____..___ I I I I I I I , I I I I I I , I I . , , , , , , . , , , , . , , , : , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , . , ~ , . , 3! 3! ! ----r---'----r--- I I_I , . . , , , , . . 3: 1: : ____L___~____+___ , , , , , , . , , 2! 1! : ---r---'----r--- , , . . , , , , , , , , 2: 1: : ____L___..____,L___ , , , , , , , , , 11! : ¡ ¡ :351.30 ____T__~--·'-~--T----r-_-r--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 17: 1 : : : 65: 20 ___~.,_._I____~____..___~___L___ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 ¡ ! ¡ ¡ ¡50! 15 _____T__~---,----,--_~---r--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . , I I I I . I I 1 17: : : : : 65: 20 .____..__-I-___..____.._~_-I-___L___ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----;- -I 5 = Worst , , , , , , , . , ---:----:---1----1 . , , . , , , . . , , , .......1................1......., ! ! Page 23 = Best 1 I I . I , I I I I I I I I I I ____·'----T·--~---T------r---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --:- , , ....·......t.. , , , . , , , , ..................... , , , . , , I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I ___ ~___~_~_'----r---,----T--- I I I I I I I I I I I I :.. I I , , , ~ , , , 229 tali an Alder 7! ! ! ! ! 15! 10 3: 2 ¡ _________________________________ ____T_~~---~----,---~--_r--- ~~--r~--'---· --- , I I I I I I I _ A/nus cordata : : : : :: :: I I I I I I I I I I .....~.?g..... tt_~!}_~'i_~?_.~~_s_t~__~~____~_______. _~__t___L__t___L__l~QL~_~ _~J_?j_~__L_~ I I I I I I I I I Gleditsia triacanthos : : : :.:: ::: -+- \ _ Job Name: Valico Residential Project. 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino VJ Job #: 08-05-158 C> Date: August 9th, 2005 Status '7 ..... ~ c:- - w a::: ('. W o w c.: - W f- a:: c.: 0 D.. f- W ..J W f- «(?u > <{ W Of-f- ::E ¡¡:: 0 W W c.: a:: I Q. Recommend ¡- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , f : , , , , , , , , , , , , LO : 1-1 ~ : : c:( -- I ::::- W : I 0 (j) , , <{ -:0:::;2 w U?:w:w ~ :S:~:a:: o a::::=:!:c 0::: w:J-:z :5 J-,o::::w -.J :g;:w::1!: o >:u..::2 o U):U):o r- o:O:u o w:UJ'w o WIW:c::: a::: Z:2' Pest/Disease Problems -. : , , -, "" , , -, -, 0: W' cc: w' >: 0: ü: cc: 5: -.J: 0: ü' , 1-' 0: 0: CC' , f ¡ : " , " , : 1O: : , I: . ! :s: ! : ill : : (f) : , « , : ill ;:0: : ~ lò: ~: : 0 11_: _: s¡ >-: LO'~ 0'«' I : s: : ü: .....'OIO'WI -, Q' , (I):a:::!s::o: ...-: 01 :~: Ü:W:OIZ: w:w:«:::>, (fJIO::::W:a::: ~!J-:o:J-: f f , , ····..·~......·t· , , , , , , f f f f f , I I I I ..·....·..·}.....··¡·..·····¡····..·.¡.···........t· I I I I , I I I I I ! I t I I Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs , I I I I I I I I' I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I , I I 'I " I I I' I I , I 'I '" I : : â: ::::.- I......' I I , , l!) : :':.-. : z: It-: I : :~: ~ : 0 I: S I I (1"\ I , I -f- '" , I 1\....I'.q C) '....... '-'I=tt: >- : _: z: - Z I <.9 : ....... ~- : I- ,l!)'-f-'C) '2,0:: C) ,0 ~ :~:«:z 21~·:O Z ,:WID :-:~:- « :1- - 0:0:- ~¡w:~:J- ill ~:U) ~ z UJ:O:: ~:o:::z:~ ~ I:W « ill w:~ -,::>,01 Ü J-IOC 0:: ill Z'C) I:f-:~:O ~ ~:~ ~ > ø:z f-'UI_'~ I W' '~'O'~ , 0 '-z ....J I --' I 1 « 1 ....J I «:~:Z:N 0 0:0 0 ~ m:~ w:~:O:« ~ ~:ælæ,w <c:æ I:Ø:O:IO o:o:o:æ O:~ 1 1 " , " , ,1.......1..·...·:......+· , 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 . 1 1 Measurements f- 0 0 W W W W f- f- LL <{ « N :;;: ~ r.:.' - f- "'" f- ø c.: ¡ß W W f- 0 f- I « W W I :;;: º c.: en « w a.. o Õ I ø I '" o , , : : , , , f-: W: W: LL: ",' -' .....' ~:~ ¡Q\:W "",f- æ:(/) w:>- f-,ø w' , :2:~ «1~ -:~ 0:::2: BARRIE D, COATE and ASSOCIATES 4001353-1051 2J535SlImmitl!:oad L~Ca1OS,CA 95030 ~ 3: 2: : ---f---~----f--- , , , , , , 6 1 1 1 1 '15110 --f--~~--~----~---~---~--- · 1 1 1 I I , 1 1 1 1 I Plant Name Tree # - j , , , , , , ...............+.' , , , , , , I I I , , , , , , , , , ......,........'1'.......,... , , , , . , , , , 1 I I' I 1 1 I' I 1 I I .........·...........1........1·............·····..·+· 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ i . 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 ···...·....'I'..·....'·.......f......·'I'....·.....·'I'· 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 , I I 1 .......40·..·..·1.........·..····...· I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I , , . 2: 2: : ----~---~----...--- , , , I ·1 I , , , 1 1 I 1 1 I 8: : : : :20: 15 --...-------~----~--------~--- 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I C'_()~_~y_~£~~~_t 231 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 , I . ......·,··..·..·,·.......t......·'I'· I 1 . , 1 1 1 I 1 , I 2: 21 : ----~---~----t--- , , , , , . ! ! , , , , , , ................... , , , , , , 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I .....................1........1.......+............... I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .......,........1...................· 1 I 1 1 , . , 1 I . , , , 2: 2: : ----~---~----...--- , , . , , , , , , 10: : : : : 20: 15 ---t--~---~----~---~---}--- · 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 . I 1 1 1 I I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 6: : : : : 10: 10 --+-------~----~---~---~--- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 I , 1 1 1:i.()~_~L~£~~_s_~_ 232 I:i.()~_~y_~£~~_s_t 233 ~ , . , , , , ·.....·r·-·....y· , , , , , , 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I ..........-'1'.......,........,.......'1'..........-'1'. 1 I I' . 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ....·..l.....·..I........r....·..r· 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2! 2! ! ----r---'----r--- . , , , , , ! 1 J -I - , , , , , , ................... , , · , · , 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 .....................1........1......................... 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I ................1................... 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 , , , 3: 2: : ----~---~---_.._-- , , , , , , , , , 8! ! ! ! ! 15: 15 ----r---r---,----,----r---r--- I I I 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 11: : : : :20: 20 ---_.._-~---~---_.._--~---~--- 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 C'_()~_~y_~£~~_s_~_ 234 C'_()~_~y_~s>_~~~_~_________________ ~_~~!SI~~~_~~~~_______________ PJliUS kawakami 235 236 , : , , , , , · , · , : , , , . , : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , --_.._--~--_.._---~---- , , , , , , · . , , , , , , , , 1 I , 1 1 I I 1 I I -_._-~---_.._--~--_.._-----~---- I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I I . I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I . 1 --_.._---~--_.l_---~---~--_..._-- 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I , : , , , , , , , , , , , , : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 3! 2! : ---r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 3: 2: : ----~--_.l_--_..._-- , , , , , , , , , 8! ! ! ! ! 15: 15 ----r---r---~---~,----r---r--- 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I . I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 7! ! ! ! ! 10: 10 ---_..._-~---~--~_.._--~~--~--- 1 1 . 1 1 I 1 I . 1 1 1 1 I I 1 ~_~~!SI~~~_~~_'!~_______________ __~~~___l~_~~!SI_ec~~_~~_'!~_______________ 237 , , , , , , , , , ---T----~---,----·----;---- , , , , , , , , , I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I' -----~-~~-r---_r---,------r---- I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I . 1 , I I I I 1 --- ----r---'----r---~----r--- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 ¡ 2! ! ----r---~----r~-- , , , , , , , , , , , , , ··~·......t·...·..í.... ·.......~I : : ~ Page 24 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 .....................I........,.....................J.. I 1 I I . I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I , , , ·t· : , , , , , , , , , .................1.......... , , . , , , , , , , , , 2: 2: : ____L___.l____L___ , , , , , , , , , 8! ¡ ¡ : : 151 15 ---T---r---~----,---_r---r--- 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I · , 1 r 1 I I 1 1 1 1 8: : : : :20: 15 __...__~___J____..___~___L___ 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 __.?~~___ C'_()~_~y_~£~~~_t ,J1.o.. C'_()~_~L~s>_~~3 5 = Worst = Best 1 0123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Project, Job Name: Vallco Residential Job # 08-05-158 Date: 91h 2005 August L \ \,¡'J - , , I: ~ ................. - , , , , , , ......1.......1.. , , , , " - , , , , ......~......+ ---- , , i ¡ - , , , , , , ~__{w___~_w_~____ -------- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---t----:---1---- --------1 I I I I , , , , , , , , , ---T----r---'---- -------- , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , ---.1.----'----..---- _______ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---T----r---'---- -------- , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---î----¡---1--~a-g-~-25 ~I . , I = Best, 5 = Worst Pest/Disease Problems Recommend . I L. I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I 'I I G)! ! ! _! !!! " I I 1.01 -. I I I 01 : : ~: trt : :...J'M' ill ¡ ¡ ¡ õ! ~ ! ! ~ ~ WI I WI W I 1>- <c: : : 0:::: en : : 0 >- W' 1--' W' lii ..........' rv'oo::: ~ ('-" I , I I I u...1 c:::; _ en, ~I ar;, > I Ll? W' W ~ ~ w _, ..~ I I I (jJ. I I ...... ~_. ill 01 'I Sf 0 I - T""" I N I a::: 0 w ^" : 0: ~ ü: 0 [E':::¡: - w ì= lÕ: ;;f:: 0 <C 0::: 0::: w:;::::: Cz ~ 0:: 0 .I~I 0 «. <C ~''-I ...... I- SIO:O ill ..J::J ~:ffi:LLJ ...J w ill (J)¡ct!~ 0 61 0 S¡LL!~ <C t9 0 0:0: :::¿ 0: 0 (f):(f):~ 6 <C w w:w:o z 1-: I- 010:0 -== t:: I- U)IWI«:::> 0.0 WIWIO -== 0:::: 0 z!a:::!~ cr: 0: 0 w!w!~ ~ ill a::: _,I-, I- cr::, 0::: ZIZ, I 0.... !" .,....,.. L ' ' , , ' , }., .¡.......}.,. , ' , . ' , I 1 1- Status I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I ---- -...---., --- -r--:"'1' --- ~ --\"- ~--, I I " , , , , I I , , ., , I , " . , , , I , , 1 , I I -----~----~---~---~------~-~-- I , " , 1 1 . 1 , 1 , " I , I I' 1 . , I' 1 , , 1 I . -----'----r---~---~--~---\"~--- , , 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 , 1 I' , I , , I 1 1 1 . 1 1 , I " 1 -----~----~---~---~------~-~-- 1 , , , 1 1 , , 1 I 1 I I' 1 I 1 I , I 1 I I' 1 , 1 " , ....................,........1........... ..... 1 I 1 , I , 1 ., , , I I' 1 I I I 1 -t- I , , , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 I' , -----'----r---~---~------r---- I 1 1 1 I I I I' , , I I' , , 1 , I , I 1 , I I , I I' 1 -----~---_.._--~--_..._~----~---- , , " , 1 , " , 1 1 , I I 1 , , , 1 , 1 , , 1 I I I 1 I .........·...........1........'....·.....··......·.....·, , , I I , , , , I , , , , 1 , I I I I I , I I I , , , , I , , , 1 , , ·....·...··.....·...·,·..·····t...............·....·1'· I , , , I , , I' , , , , I , I I , , , , .....\...........\. , , , , , ' , , I , , , 1 I , , , I I , , . I . __~~____~___~____L___~___~___ , , I , , 1 , , 1 , , I I I , . , 1 , 1 1 1 , I 1 I , 1 I , I 1 , , I 1 ___~----~--~,----I"---'~---T--- , , I , , I , I , I , 1 I , , I , 1 , , , , , , 1 I , , I I I I , 1 I 1 ___~____~___~____L___~___~___ , , 1 , , , , I , , , I , 1 , , I , 1 , , , I I I , I , 1 , I , 1 , , , ___~----~---,--_-I"---'----r--_ , I , I , , I 1 , 1 I I I , 1 1 , I I , 1 I , , , I 1 I , , ---f----~---~----~-~-~---~---' I , 1 , , 1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 I , I . , I 1 I 1 , 1 "I , I , 1 1 , I , I I 1 ___...____~___~____L___~_~_~___ , , , 1 1 I 1 , , , , , , 1 , 1 , Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs , I , I ,I I , 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 " , I , 1 I' , I I 1 ., , 1 I I " . , I I I I : ô: :: ::- 1...-1 " 1 1 LC) : . : __ : Z J-: I I : ~: ~ : : 0 I:: ~ 1 (91' "~ (91 '>- I I~ Ø:rnl« -:~:~ I --, Z, Z ' ~ , ~' 0' ~ 1t.()1;::'(9 'Z}O:::I(9 11(2 :~:«~Iz 2'-Z:0 Z .:WIO :-' - ~ :1- - 0:0:- ~:W O:::¡I- w ~:oo ~ Z:W:O::: 'I~ ZI~o:: ~ I'W ~IW'W,~ ~, 0, 0 'o::~' 'Z' -I~' J-, ~'W' '(9 IIf- ~IO ~ ~I~ ~:>:øIZ 1-:0 _0:0::: ::O:W:Z- ~'::I I~ ' ,I ~I ~:~ Z: 0 0:0 O:~:ro:~ W:I- 0: 0::: 0::::0::: O::::W:~:O::: I:W O:I 0 ü:O:O:O::::O:~ 1 I , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 I , .................,........,.......\". I , , I , I , 1 , 1 , , - , " , " , " .......... .......).......... , " , " , " , I , 1 1 , I , 1 1 1 , ................'........1..·......· 1 I , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , , f , , , ......y. , , t 2! 1! ! ___~___~____L___ , , , , , , , , , 1! 1 ¡ ! ~---r---'~---r~-- , , , , , , , , , 19: ! : ¡ ¡ 30! 30 1! 2 ¡ ! -~--r--~---,----,---~---r~-- ----1"---,----1"--- I , , I 1 I 1 I 1 I . , , ,I ,I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 , 30! ! ¡ ! : 30! 25 1: 2! ¡ ____...__~___~____~___~___~~~_ ___~___~____L___ I , , I " I I I 1 . 1 , 1 1 "I , 1 1 1 I' 1 1 1 , , , 2: 2 I : ___L___~____L___ , , , , , , , , , 2! 2 ¡ ¡ ---I"---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 2: 2: : ---~---~----..--- , , , , , , . . , 3: 2: : ----~---4----t--- , , , I : ' 2! 2! ! ----~---~----..--- , , , , , , , , . 2' 2' I ----~---~----.--- , , , , . , Job Name: Vallco Residential Project. 10123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 18: ! ! ! ! 30: 30 ____T__-r___,____,___-r___r___ . I 1 1 , . 1 I , 1 , , I , I , I , I I 1 , 1 I 10: : : : :25: 15 ____L__~___~____~__~~___L___ , 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 , I 1 , , 1 I 1 , I 16: ¡ ¡ ! : 25: 25 ----r---r---,----,---~---r--~ I . , 1 I 1 I , 1 1 , . 1 1 , , , , 1 I I , , 19: : : : : 20: 25 ____...__~___~____~___~___L___ I 1 I I , I , I , , I , 1 I 1 1 , , 5 I 1 I , 110' 5 ---~f--~---~----4---~---~--- I 1 I I I , , I 1 , , 1 I 1 , , , , I 1 I I I , 16: : : I : 25: 25 ____..__~___~____~___~_~_L___ . I I I I I 1 I , , , I I 1 1 , , , 8: : J I :20: 15 ----¡--1----~----1----~---f--- 1 , I 1 , , ¡ i ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ I 1 I I 1 1 7: 1 : : : 15: 15 ----..--~---~----~.--~---~--- I , I I I , , I , , , I , , I , , , Measurements , , , , , , , , , , , , , I- 0:0 w W'w 'f- I~ ~:~ : ~\"<:: :N :2::~ , 6=:1\ ~' I- I~ :00 :0::: æ:w :~ l-iD :w I:iiJ I::2: S21a:: m:<e w:a... o:n I:oo , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , . , , , I CD o , I , ¡ , , , , : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : , , , . , , , , , : , , , f-' w: wi LL' , N' -' ~, ..J.!::2 @)!~ a:::OO w:>- f-'({) w' , :2:~ «:.-J -:=> 0::2 244 talian Stone Pine "... ......... _ _____ __ _______ _ ______ ~____4 __ ___ 245 Italian Stone Pine -- - -- - - -- --- - --- -- -- -- -----~ -- ---, 246 Italian Stone Pine ------~--------------------------' 247 Italian Stone Pine ------~-------------------------- 248 Italian Stone Pine --------~---------~~----~----~--- 249 ~~J~~!:'_~~~!:'~£~~t3______________. 250 ~?~~~~~Y_~J0_~_________________ - +- I ~ BARRIE O. COATI and ASSOCIATES (400)353-1052 ~ ""'~."~ losGatos,CA 95030 Tree # \ Plant Name 241 ~_()!:'..~y_~~~':l.?_~_________________ - 242 ~_()!:'..~y_~~~':l.?_~_________________ !~lle_!!t3_e 243 -t.- , W ~ 5 = Worst --I , , , , , , , , , ---T---~---'---- ----.---~ , . , , , , , , , , , , , . , , . , ---¿---~---~---- ---- , , , , , . , , , - - - - - : : :: ! : : :! : -----~----~---~---1------r---- ! ! :: : I I: : ::: : : :: : --:~-:--:----~_.- --:-:-:--:--r-- : : : Page 26 : : ',: : t.!! t I _ _ Status (', W ('. W w a: W I- - a: 0 <l. I- W -'wI- <t (,') 0 > « w o I- I- :;: C2 0 W w a: a:: I "- , , , · , , , , . --_.---~---~----.---- , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , . --_.----~---~----.---- , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , ---~----~---~----.---- , . , , . , , , , , , , , , , ---t----~---~----·---~ · , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ---+----...---..----1 , . , , . , , , , Recommend , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I 1_ : : -I: C'1 : : <c: ,.=. , 1>'- : : 0: > "-'a:::'-=:::'I- ll?!W:W!æ ::s.:~ a:: 0 0::::-1 ð :;:;::; WI¡::: I-'a: ~ ~ UJ UJ o 0 w w w W 2 2 - , , , ---1---+ + -, · , , , , . ! ! I , , . , , . , , , ---+----1-----1----, , . , , , , , . , = Best z W :;: :;: o u W a:: 1 I I I I I I I I I I -----~----t---~---~------~---- , I 'I I I I I' I , I I I I I I I I I I , 'I , _____J____t___JL___l______~____ I I I' I I , 'I I I I I' I I I 'I I , . I I I I' I -----'----r---~---T------r---- I , .. I I I I I I , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----~---_._--~--_._-----~---- 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I , -----~----f---~---{---þ--~---- I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 " 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I' 1 I 1 1 I 1 _____~____~________4______~____ 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 PesUDisease Problems 'I 1 1 'I , 1 J 1 , lí)! !--.! 'I ,U')I. or- , I' 1 ~ -I 1..-1 , -, w : 01 (/) 1 W' l « : 0::: ( W -I W ~ lñ: Il(! > I o "~I 0 { ~ ~ :::-: >- : ü co: 0 <c: 0::: , I Ü 1 <í :::-10 0 w: ..J UJ a: Q 01 ë5 ~ ü S ~: ü ~ W 0 z! t- (f) W « =:'1 0 Z a:::: W 0.::: 0 _ I- 0 1--: 0:::1 .. , ,. , -~---1-~--~---~---~------t-- ,- I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I_ 1 I 1 I 1 1 , 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 _þþ_~~__þ_.___~___4____þ_~__ I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 ---+----~---~----~---~----.--- 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 I I , 1 I 1 I , I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I-----I~I---I--f- 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T T , , : : : 1 , , , t_ ! : ~ 1-: : 0 II: >- S2!::ft!!:: (!JI 01 a:::: >IW10 I 10:_ 01 WI 0::: Z:wJo.. W'Z1C9 W:(f):Z >IW:_ Ol--.JIZ :::2:1[]]1:J WI «I a:::: a::::! ül 0... I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ---T----r---'----r---,----T--- 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 ___4____~___~____L___~____~___ 1 1 I , 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ___4____~___~____~________.___ I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ---T----r---'----r---,----T--- 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I ___4____~___~____L___~___~___ I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I , I , I 1 I I 1 , 1 I I 1 1 , 1 1 1 I , I , , ---.----~---~----~---~---+--- I 1 , I 1 1 I I , I I I I I , I , , , 1 1 I I I , 1 I I , I ---~----~---~----~---~----.--- , , 1 1 I I , , I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I , 1 , I I 1 1 1 , 1 , I 1 , I , , 1 ---I----~---~----f---~----I--- 1 , I 1 I I , 1 I 1 I I lit , '_ , Pruning/Cabling Needs , , , I , , , , , , , , , , , : : : , , , , '2 10 , - II- <.9;« z·. a:::: <.:> 2'0 ~ 2 I- UJ _ UJ _ I w « I- œ: œ: ~ ~¡~ o ala Ct: o:::'a:::: ü ü!ü , , , -1-- , , , , , , , : Measurements Condition -.- ---¡ 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 , " , " , " : 10: , ~. 1,1_ ININ ~ 0 1-:'"";" WOW 'C)I'I:'j" <..9 W W I- -I Z I - ~ _ LOI -I t.... Z I..L«...... "I-I'-'Z N :2: ~ 0: «! ~ « I§) ¡::: I- "' W a:,1- W (f) (f) 1 a:::: z:« --.J 0.:: W W :::- =:I 0: a:::: ü ~ I- 0 I I- ¡::::O ;¡; w I « I- Ü (5:Ct:: ::;: I -:2: ~ ~ ~ ~ z!~ 0 m « ill 0.. W I- 01« a:::: o Q I (/) I (f) ü:I ü 1 I , 1 " 1 1 I 1 , 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 I , , 1 'I I' 1 ~~_l_~JL___J____J___JL?~l~_~I_~_l_~_J____l--- 1 1 I I 'I I I , 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I , 1 I , 1 I 1 1 I , , , , 1 : 2: I ___~___~____L___ , . , , . , , , , 2! 2! ! ----r---'----r--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 2: 3: : ---~---~----~--- · , , , , , · , , 3 ¡ 1! ¡ ----r---'----T--- , , , , , . , , , 2: 2: : ----~---~----.--- , , , , , , , , , , , , 2: 2: : ___L___~____~___ · . , , . , , . , , , , 2: 2: 1 ___L___~____~___ · , , · , , , , , , . , 2 I 21 : ---~---~----f--- , , , , , , t , 1 -+- 1 Job Name: Vallco Residential Project, 10123 N, Wolfe Road, Cupertino -, W Job #: 08-05-158 W Date: August 9th, 2005 .....¡.?º¡.~?I...~..¡...1. " , " , I! 1 26! ! ! ! ! 80: 30 ----T--,----,----,---,----r--- , 1 I , 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 . , , , 1 I 1 1 , 1 I 6:x:4: 1115:15 ____4_______~____~___~___~___ 1 1 I , I 1 , 1 I I , , 1 , 1 1 I , 7: : ! i : 15: 15 ----T--ïï---'----~---ïï---r--- , , I I I , 1 I , , , , , I , I 1 1 , I 1 , , I 21 1 : : I 120: 35 ___L__~___~____4________L___ I , I , 1 1 1 , , , , I I , I I I , , , , 1 , I 7' , , , '15115 ---f--~---~----~----~---t--- 1 , I I I , 1 , I I , , 1 , I , I 1 I I 1 , , , 7 I : I : : 15: 15 ____L_______~____4________L___ 1 I , 1 , I , , , , , I , , , , I , I I I I I I 7: 1 : : : 15: 10 ----f--~--~~----4---~---~~-- I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I , , 1 , , I , , , I 7 1 : 1 : : 15: 15 ____L__~__~~____4_______~~_~_ I , , 1 , I 1 , , , 1 1 I 1 1 , I 1 , T , , I , , , , I- : w , w u... C! ~ "';',:::2: ,ç::¡,:w "",I- a::::1(f) wl>- I-'UJ W' , ,- ~:~ I «::::J CD o:~ 0 22 _ 260 _lç_()?cs.~~"'E.'Y_()()5!m_____m____ 251 fi_()~..'~y_~?.~~;;_t. --------- 252 fi_()~_~y_~?.~~;;_~_________________ --------- 253 fi_()~_~y_~?.~~;;_~_________________ --------- 254 fi_()~_~y_~?.~~;;_~_________________ ~-------- 255 fi_()~_~y_~?.~~_~_________________ --------- 256 Italian Stone Pine --------- --------------------------------- 257 Coast Redwood --------- ---------~---~---------------~--- 258 ç:()?_s.~~Jy_~_ÇJ_~~________________ --------- . ~ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES (400)353-1052 ~ ""'~.""- losGatos,CA 95030 trunks Plant Name Quercus agrifolia __;z_~~J~~;~~~~~td (4 , Tree # PestJDisease Problems Recommend Status 'I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I , I ! LD'! ! ___: ¡ ! , '1 ,1.0.......... I I : s: :~: ~ : -.J \ M ¡ w ¡ ¡ 0': ~ ! « ¡ ~ I (/), I W' W >,- :<t:: : 0::: if) : 0:>- 'WI __I w' « "'-'0::: ::2:1~ (". ! ~! Lñ: U{ ! >! w .U{! WI Ul! c:: (". ill : 0: ~ : S: 0: ~ ~: t::! : a:: : 0 ill ~ ~, ~ I _, >- I U lOa::: I ....J I I - ill L- l{')! 10:«: 0:::: cr:: w:-IO:O:: a::: .-- " 'O'ü' «'..( L-II-,Zl~ I- 0 ~, , I I -.J' -.J '-'O:::'w' ill - o:O:w: -I:.J :«:W: :..J w (f) O::::s:O: 0: 0 5::LL::¡::od: (9 G o ü: :~: 0: 0 (/):u:d~:~ <{ ill ill w:o:z: 1-: I- 0:0:°:-:::: t: }-- (/) W'«I~I 010 w,w,u,..:; a::: 0 z a::::~:cr::: 0: 0 w:w:~:~ ill 0:: _.....: :.-: o::::o::z:z:: :to. I I' I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I , I I I I -----~----t---1_---¡------t---- ---t----,---j---- --------I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I' I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I' I ,_____4____.___~___··_____·_w__ ---.---~---~---- ----,---- I I I I I I I I I I I' , I I , I I I I I I I I 1II1 I t--t- - I I I I , I I ...........}.......!........j.......}...........}.. .¡.......}.., --! I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I' - - I I I I , I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I , " .....................1.........··..·.....··..···...·...· .............. - I , 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I' I , I I , " Measurements Condition Pruning/Cabling Needs . I I -I I I " I I I I I I I' I I I I I 1 I I . I' I I I 1 . 1 . I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I , , I I I I I I I' I . I . 1 1 I" ," I : :: ::: â: :::: .- 1--1 I' ,I 1".-' ,I" U') w: :: :: 1':'- : I z: : I-- ' 1 I' t' NI N , 101 I ".- W, , , L- ' 0 I --I ".- I I _ I I I -- LL: : 1 ill Olw : le:>:...,t <.9: :1-1 :<.9;t >- N: : : w W II- : .-1 Z: -- : (9 , « : : -~' t: ::: 1 I 1 "I-- , « , l() , L: ,1'1"\ Z 1 Z a::: , 1'1"\ . I 0 tV . I ....... «I ,".-1........ -,- 0,........, 'w ~ ..,} ':2: N' :2: I ".- I « 'Z z' z ' Z' I' 1 0 :w :2 : - : _I a:::: - «: I- : - : 0: 0 : - .A\IL- A\ ;::, I- .-",' UJ I I- WI Z (/). U), Z' w· a::: ~,.- ~ r- I (j)' , « , - I - , , I tV ICfJ (f) , I I a::: z, tV ~'I w, « 1 w' W I a... w:>- a::: W: W S:::I 0:....... 0 \ I- 0:::: a::: : : Z: c.9 L- :CfJ ~ L-: 0 I: I- ¡::: 0 ~:~ ~:~: >w : (/): Z r-'I r- '-1« L-IO _,tV 1 "'w' W ,- WI' W ~, 0 I ....... . I 0 ' ,-z 0;::::: II- 1'/"\ I ~ I ::> I «' I 1 ~ I ~:~ I I ~ ~:a::: «:ü::: Z:N 0:0 O:O::2:lm:::> ~:::I ro ro « w:~ w:1- 0:« a::::a::: a::::a::::w:«:a::: 0:2 0 0 0 ~:(/) I:CfJ O:I 0:0 ü:O:Ct:::O:~ 1 1 1 I. 1 1 I I I , 20 : :: 50: 20 3: 1 :: : : : .........: ......}.. .... ....... ....:....... }.... "f ...... ....... ~....... -- - ~ -- - --- ---{ -- _ø ~-- ---1--- -f---' I 1 , , I 1 I 1 . 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I' I 1 1 1 I , 1 , I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 'I I 1 I , 1 , L.T...!.~.J...~...!...~...!.......l.?9.l.~.º ...~..l..~. nø ____L~~L___l___1__~Lø_ , I 1 , 'I 1 ' , , 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 ' , , I , 1 I I I I I' I , I I 1 I 1 1 , 1 I 1 I .......:........:........~.......}. I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I , I I 1 I 1 I I , 1 1 1 , .................,.................... , I I , , 1 1 , I 1 1 , 2! 1 .......y...... , , , - 3! 1 ............... , , , 11 55:20 ..... ......y...... , , , - - 9! ¡ ! : ! 55! 20 .........1......1........1........,·.........··..··....... 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 I , 1 1 I 1 I , I 1 I ~--I ~ BA'OEO.COATE and ASSOCIATES 14œ)J5~I052 ~ -~.. losGaLos,CA 95030 Tree # Plant Name 261 Coast Redwood --------- ..................................... 262 Coast Redwood --------- ...................................., - 263 Coast Redwood .................................... - 264 Coast Redwood ..................................., --I -I -I - , , , , , , ......"f.......y. , , , , , , , , , , , , .................. , , , , i i , . , , , , .......r...··..T· , , , , , , . , , , , , ................... , , , , , , I I I 1 I 1 , 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ...........1'................,.......1'...........1'., 1 . I 1 I , 1 I I I · 1 1 I . · I I 1 . , 1 I 1 I I 1 1 . 1 .....................................,............,.. 1 I I 1 I 1 , 'I 1 I , , I 1 I I I I I · 1 1 I , I , I' , I 1 1 1 ···....··..1'.......1.......·'..·····1'..·..·...··1'.. 1 , 'I , I 1 , I . , I 'I I · 1 " 1 I , 1 I . I , I' t ...........,.................I.......,..............· · 1 1 I 1 , I 1 . , I 1 I 1 1 · , I , I 1 . 1 I . 1 . ......·,..··..·""...·.."t·····..T.. , 1 I , I 1 , I 1 I . I I . . 1 'I . 1 1 1 I . I ................,.................... I 1 1 , · . . I 1 I I , I I I I ,- 1 I , 1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 I .....··,......··.......·T..·..·T.......'........,·.. 1 , I I 1 I I I I . 1 I I . . 1 . I 1 I 1 . · . I 1 , , 1 , .......I........I.................,... , I . I I . I 1 · . . 1 2! 2 ......·T...... , , , - , , , ........... , , , , , .......~. , , , --:- : , , ·...·..t···...·~....· 1 : o 10 ¡ x ¡ 8 1 ! ¡ 4012 ................,......··,·..·····'·..·..·T·....·Y..· 1 , , I 1 , I 1 1 , I I I 1 1 . I 1 . I I 1 1 I . 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I .........1..................·..·..·,....·.....··........ I , , . I , . I I , . I 1 I , I , , · , 1 I · I 1 , 1 I I I ········1········.·······1'······1'·, · 1 I . , . 1 1 · , I :.. , , , .. , , , Coast Redwood ................................... 265 -I , , , , , , ......".......1'. , , , , , , , , , , , , .......1..................... , , , : : : PaRe 27 · I I' . , , I' 1 · I .. I ...........1'.......,........'.......1'...........1'.. · . . , . 1 . I' I . ,. I , , , , , 1 1 I 1 I 1 , 1 1 1 .....................I........I....................,.. 1 . I' , 1 , I 1 . I I I' , I I I 1 1 1 , , · I . I ·......T·..··.......·.."..··..·T.. · , , , , I , I · , 1 , I 1 , . I , I , 1 I 1 , · . , 1 , 1 __---' .' . , L...--I.-- 1 .. 1 , I . I . 1 I . 1 . . , , .......1'. , , --:.. , , , ........1.. , , , , , , .....1'., , , -:.. I I , 1 I , I 1 . I I 1 I , , .1........1........1.................. 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I , I I 1 I , I , = Best. 5 = Worst 1 10123 N. Wolfe Road, Cupertino Job Name: Vallco Residential Project Job #: 08-05-158 Date: August 9th, 2005 -t:- I - W -+:. ~ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES Horticutural Consultants 23535 Summit Road Los Gates, CA 95033 4081353-1052 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. Any legal description provided to the appraiser/consultant is assumed to be correct. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character nor is any opinion rendered as to the quality of any title. 2. The appraiser/consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for accuracy of information provided by others. 3. The appraiser/consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this appraisal unless subsequent written arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for services. 4. Loss or removal of any part of this report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation. 5. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person(s) to whom it is addressed without written consent of this appraiser/consultant. 6. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the appraiser/consultant, and the appraiser's/consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any finding to be reported. 7. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, photos, etc., in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys. 8. This report has been made in conformity with acceptable appraisal/evaluation/diagnostic reporting techniques and procedures, as recommended by the International Society of Arboriculture. 9. When applying any pesticide, fungicide, or herbicide, always follow label instructions. 1 a.No tree described in this report was climbed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take responsibility for any defects which could only have been discovered by climbing. A full root collar inspection, consisting of excavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root collar and major buttress roots, was not performed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take responsibility for any root defects which could only have been discovered by such an inspection. CONSULTING ARBORIST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. ó3~~~ Barrie D. Coate ISA Certified Arborist Horticultural Consultant '-I-{ 35 V ALLCO RESIDENCES DEVELOPMENT LANDMARK PROPERTIES MANAGMENT FISCAL AND ENROLLMENT IMP ACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: . j, ~--p The City of-Cuperti~~ ' ' I~ Prepared by: TOWN HALL SERVICES 830 Woodside Road, Suite 4 Redwood City, Califomia 94061 (650) 373-7373 phone (650) 373-7370 fax www.townhallservices.com November 2005 4-/3Þ ENROLLMENT IMPACTS Background The City of Cupertino has contracted with Town Hall Services to conduct an objective analysis of the fiscal and enrollment impacts of the proposed Valleo Residences development project, a proposed 156 unit development with 19,000 square feet of playground arp, and approximately 35,000 square feet oflandscaped courtyard area. The project is located on a 5.19 acre parcel which is currently a portion ofthe Valleo Fashion Park shopping center on Wolfe Road adjacent to Highway 280. Landmark Properties Management, LLC anticipates that construction of the project will begin between fall and winter 2006, and be completed by an estimated mid 2009. This analysis contains a projection of new students as a result of the project, and an identification of the fiscal impacts of the project on the districts of which the projected students would attend. The proposed Valleo Residences project is located within the school district service areas of Cupertino Union Elementary School District (CUSD) and Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD). The individual school attendance areas in which Valleo Residences would be located are: Collins Elementary School, Lawson Middle School, and Cupertino High School. Again, the purpose ofthis report is to assess the fiscal and enrollment impacts of this project on the aforementioned schools. Student Generation Rate Analysis A projection of new student enrollment as a result of the Valleo Residences project allows the potential impact of development on the three impacted schools, now and into the future, to be considered. Student generation rates (SGRs), the average number of students per new housing unit, are a significant factor for the projection of enrollment into the future. Multiplying the number of new units by an appropriate SGR results in a projection of students from the units. Different housing types generate different SGRs. Our experience is that single family detached units typically generate approximately two to three times the amount of students generated by multi-family condominium and apartment units. Townhouses (single family attached units) usually exhibit slightly lower SGRs than most single family detached units, but generally have an SGR much greater than multi-family condominium and apartment units. Condominiums (similar to the ones proposed in the Valleo Residences project) and apartments usually have relatively low SGRs unless there are size or affordability features that make them attractive to families with children who require additional space. Factors other than housing type, such as the sale price, the location of residential development, and socio-economics, are also significant in determining student generation. When the units are new, younger families tend to be over-represented and student generation is generally greater at the elementary school level. As new units begin to age, the students PJesent begin to enter the higher grade levels and eventually high school. Thus, with their families Town Hall Services J November, 2005 Lj~/3 7 Citv ofCuDertino Val/co ProDerties DeveloDment ImDact Analvsis aging, they are not replaced by new students at the same rate. A more stabilized SGR occurs as the subdivision ages, with the spreading of students amongst the elementary, middle, and high school being more equally apportioned. Recent Residential Development In Cupertino In order to determine an appropriate SGR to assign to the 156 Valko Residences units, we identified recently developed residential units within the City of Cupertino that are similar in type and characteristics to the proposed Vallco Residences development. We then utilized address and grade information rrom the 2004 student file for both CUSD and FUHSD to count students rrom the units, then calculated elementary and high school SGRs for the various residential developments. Our SGR analysis included site visits to a fairly wide range of single family detached and single family attached projects. It covered 15 residential developments of various types in different parts of the City with an approximate total unit count ofl,723 units, 813 ofthe total being single family. A majority of the housing projects were completed within the last 3-10 years; with the exceptions being the DeAnza Oaks, Woodspring, and Seven Springs developments, which we estimate are 15 plus year old developments. It should be noted that the projects were located in various elementary, middle, and high school attendance areas, including the three attendance areas impacted by the Vallco Residences project (Collins Elementary, Lawson Middle and Cupertino High), and in areas outside of the attendance areas where the Valko Residences project would be located. Attached to this report as Appendices A and B are the SGR breakouts by development for elementary (Appendix A) and high school (Appendix B) districts. Tables I and 2 below summarize the SGR findings for both CUSD and FUHSD for the residential projects analyzed (which are shown in detail in the Appendices). Table 1 Average SGRs by Housing Type Cupertino Union School District Housing Type A.g. SGR by Units' A.g. SGR by Projecf SFD 0.497 0.545 SFA (older) 0.180 0.190 SFA (newer) 0.528 0.369 Condo./ApL 0.164 0.181 TIle total number of students divided by the total number of units; this measurement tends to be hig/JIy influenced by the largest projects and its particular characteristics. 1The average of the SGRs for each project; this measurement reflects ø broader range of projects, with a smaller project being weighted equally to a larger one. Source: Town HaU Services and CUSD stlldentfile. Town Hall Services 2 November, 2005 4-/3 ? Citv ofCuDertino Valleo ProDerÜes DeveloDment ImDact Analvsis Table 2 Average SGRs by Housing Type Fremont Union High School District Housing Type Avg. SGR by Units' Avg. SGR by Project' SFD 0.229 0.207 SFA (newer) 0.115 0.117 SFA (older) 0.125 0.089 Condo./Apt. 0.142 0.043 ¡The total number a/students divided by the total number of units; this measurement tends to be lrig/rly influenced by the largest projects and its particular characteristics. 1Theaverage of the SGRs/oreach project; this measurement reflects a broader range o/projects, with a smaller project being weighted equally to a larger one. Source: Town Hall Services and FUHSD student file. Student generation in Cupertino projects varies by housing type more than is usual in similar communities, particularly with regards to the high student generation in single family detached units, and the low student generation in most apartments. Single family detached (SFD) housing, and a large share of single family attached (SF A) housing (townhomes and condominiums), are targeted towards families with children, with many units having three or four bedrooms. This is because there is a very high premium on family housing in CUSD and FUHSD due to families wanting t? take advantage of the quality of the district's schools. Thus, student generation is very high for an older suburban area. In contrast, other single family attached units and most apartments are in multi-story buildings and have only one or two bedrooms. For young families with children they are more expensive and less satisfactory than other alternatives, so student generation in these housing types is comparatively modest. Ofthe projects we analyzed for similarity to the Vallco Residences project, the Tra Vigue Villas condominium project (46 tòtal units), which was completed within the last two to five years, is the most comparable. The Tra Vigue Villas project exhibited an elementary SGR of 0.239, above the average of the multi-family housing projects in the sample. The TraVigue Villas is a higher density project located in a primarily commercial area (Stevens Creek Blvd.), and without housing attributes such as yards and play areas (more common in single family units) that are likely to be attractive to families with school aged children. On the other hand, it is adjacent to a residential area and it has its own common areas separate rrom the commercial setting. (The Monte Bello apartments, in contrast, are incorporated into the commercial activities site.) While the TraVigue Villas project served as an important comparable for our detennination of the SGRs anticipated for the Vallco Residences project, we also evaluated each of the other projects, considered the factors that detennined its student generation, compared those factors with the Vallco Residences project, and utilized this infonnation in our choice of the SGRs used fOT projecting enrollment rrom the Vallco Residences project. Town Hall Services 3 November, 2005 If-I 3 9 City of CUDertino , Valleo ProDerties DeveloDment ImDaet Analvsis Vallco Residences SGRs The Landmark Properties Management, LLC Vallco Residences project proposes 156 units: 13 one bedroom units (averaging 675 square feet), 117 two bedroom units (averaging 950 square feet), and 26 three bedroom units (averaging 1,273 square feet). The proposed project also includes 19,000 square feet of playground area, and 35,000 square feet of landscaped courtyard and play areas. Table 3 shows the current Vallco Residences development product composition which was provided to us by Landmark Properties Management, LLC staff. The residential portion of the Vallco Residences project is a high density (30 units per acres) project with units ranging from 675 square feet to 1,275 square feet, with the majority being of the two bedroom 950 square feet variety. With these condominium units being an approximate average of 1,000 square feet per unit, and being primarily two bedroom units, the Vallco Residences condominiums will not exhibit the student generation of a more single family oriented project. (For example, the Astoria single family attached townhouse project, with ground level units of a much larger size, has an average SGR of 0.61.) Table 3 Vallco Residences Development Unit Composition Building One Bedrooms Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms Total Average Estimated Unit Square Per Unit Units Type Footage Sales Price 13 Condominium 675 $500,000 117 Condominium 950 $575,000 26 Condominium 1,273 $650,000 156 Source: Town Hall Services and Landmark Properties Management, LLC As shown in Tables I and 2, the average of the condominium and apartment projects' average SGRs for CUSD and FUHSD were 0.180 and 0.043, respectively, though individual projects ranges up to 0.290 and 0.110 for the elementary and high school districts. TraVigne Villas evidenced SGRs of 0.240 and 0.065 respectively. It is our judgment that the SGRs used to calculate new student enrollment 3-10 years after this single family attached project is constructed should be slightly above this level, partially in order to reflect the increasing desire of families to reside in the two school districts. (The SGRs should be well below the SGRs of the ground floor much larger single family attached (townhouse) units in the Bungalows Courts (the Parks at Monte Vista) and Pruneridge Avenue projects which have been recently analyzed.) The SGRs chosen for the Vallco Residences project are shown in Table 4. Town Hall Services 4 November, 2005 4-~/4-0 Citv of CUDertino Valleo Prooerties Develooment Imvact Analvsis Table 4 Valko Residences Development Projected Average SGRs Elementary (K-5) SGR Middle (6-8) SGR Total Elementary SGR Val/co Residences Development Single Family Attached-SF A Condominiums 0.13 0.06 0.19 High School SGR Source: Town Hall Services 0.10 Enrollment Impacts A determination of appropriate SGRs to be used for the Vallco Residences project allows us to proceed with the calculation ofthe enrollment generated from the project. We can also describe how those SGRs change over time, and more importantly, to assess the impact of that development on the current enrollment at the impacted schools: Eisenhower Elementary, Hyde Middle, and Cupertino High. Table 5 shows the calculated student enrollment impact resulting from the project. Table 5 Estimated Enrollment Impact* Valko Residences Development Collins Lawson Cupertino Elementary Middle High One Bedroom 13 13 13 SGR 0.06 0.02 0.02 Students Subtotal 0.65 0.26 0.26 Two Bedroom 117 117 117 SGR 0.13 0.06 0.06 Students Subtotal 15.21 7.02 7.02 Three Bedroom 26 26 26 SGR 0.20 0.08 0.08 Students Subtotal 5.20 2.08 2.08 Total Students 21 9 9 Students Per Grade 3.50 3.00 2.25 *Three to ten years after construction of the units. Source: Town Hall Services Total 1 29 9 39 3.00 Town Hall Services 5 November, 2005 Lj-ILf( Citv of Cuoertino Vallco ProlJerties Develovment ImlJact Analvsis A total of approximately 39 students are projected to be generated as a result of the Vallco Residences development, and will impact the three schools whose attendance boundaries include the project area. It is anticipated that of those 39 students: 21 will attend Collins Elementary School, 9 will attend Lawson Middle School, and 9 will attend Cupertino High School. Capacity issues at each campus will determine if all of these students will be housed at their "home" school, or whether some will need to be sent to another school out of their attendance area as a result of capacity limitations. An examination of the emollment capacity at each of these schools is discussed in the next section. Emollment impacts at these schools occur not only immediately upon completion, but also into the future as well. As stated previously, the elementary student generation is generally greatest the first few years after project completion, then begins a period of time when those students progress through the grade levels. The students at the elementary (K-5) grade level will progress into middle school in the next one to six years, and then pro gress into the high school in the next four to nine years. In short, the 9 high school students generated as a result of the proj ect will progress through high school and, in the next few years, gradually be replaced by the 30 elementary district students as they progress through the high schools. Given the larger number (per grade) of elementary district students, the high school enrollment will increase slightly above its initial level during this period. Eventually the students coming from the Vallco Residences project will tend towards a long term "steady-state" or "plateau," with enrollment at a level moderately below this initial period after construction. Enrollment Capacity At Impacted Schools Enrollment from the addition of new students as a result oftheVallco Residences project directly impacts capacity at the affected schools. In order to evaluate the impact, the capacity of the affected schools must be calculated. Table 6 shows the enrollment capacity at Cupertino High. The proposed Vallco Residences project is located within the new elementary and middle school attendance boundaries of two schools that have been significantly altered, both in terms of facilities and the grade level usage of the middle school campus. Prior to the current school year, the Lawson Middle School campus (10401 Vista Drive) operated as Collins Elementary (grades K-5). In January of2005, the students and staff of what was Collins Elementary moved from 10401 Vista to 10300 Blaney (the renovated former Portal campus). The renovated and modernized Lawson Middle School, at the old Collins elementary site, opened as a state ofthe art middle school in August, 2005. The new Collins Elementary School exists at 10300 Blaney, site of the former Portal Elementary School site. Therefore, historical enrollment information about those schools is currently not available until enrollment patterns are established. CUSD staff has indicated that although historical enrollment at these newly renovated sites is unavailable, the recently completed modernizations and Town Hall Services 6 November, 2005 4~'cf2--- Citv of CUDertino Vallco ProDerties DeveloDmen! ImDact Analvsis renovations to these campuses, combined with newly redrawn attendance boundaries, will reduce, or likely eliminate, any capacity deficit that previously existed at these sites. In the event it is not, staff would make adjustments to the attendance boundaries or school capacities to eliminate the capacity deficit. Therefore, staff has concluded that the addition of 30 students to these schools as a result of the Vallco Residences project can likely be accommodated by the two schools, especially given the relative small number of students from the Vallco Residences project. Historical data is available for Cupertino High School which allows for comparison with the schools enrollment capacity. Currently, the majority of Cupertino classes are loaded at 32 students per class. The District considers this an educationally undesirable ratio, and has operated at a lower ratio in the past. Some classrooms are loaded at lower rates due to policies and programs at FUHSD schools that affect average class size, and some rooms are not available for regular class loading due to the following principal factors which affect FUHSD classroom loading: FUHSD is reinstating the ninth grade math and English class size reduction program (CSR) in Fall 2005. Ninth grade CSR programs, which limit ninth grade math and English classes to a maximum of20 students, are subsidized by the State. About 10% of high school students are in these classes at any time. Table 6 Theoretical Enrollment Capacity At Cupertino High School Classroom Number of Classroom Total Type Classrooms Loading Factor Capacity Cupertino 9-12 56 27.5' 1,540 Cupertino Severe SDC 2 8 16 Cupertino Non-Severe SDC 1 12 12 CBEDS 2004/ Capacity Surplus (Deficit) Total Cupertino Capacity 1,568 1,542 +26 1 CBEDS 2004 represents the enrol/mellt COUllt taken in October, 2004 for the 2004-2005 school year. lCapacity calculated based on 32 studellts per class, with adjustments for teacher prep alld meeting periods and allowances for physical education and the ninth grade class size reduction (CSR) program. Source: Town Hall Services and CDSD and FUHSD data. Special use classrooms such as science labs, music, art, culinary arts, and industrial arts etc., are classrooms that are difficult to utilize every period. Also, per FUHSD policy, teachers use their classroom one period per day for teacher preparation and meetings. On the other hand, at any given time approximately 10% of the students are assumed to be in Physical Education (P.E.) class, and thus do not require classroom space on a regular basis. The result of all these programs is that the effective loading is about 27.5 students per classroom (for non-SDC classes), the figure the District uses for facilities planning. Town Hall Services 7 November, 2005 4~/tf-3 City of Cuvertino VaTlco ProDerties Develovment Imvact Analvsis Finally, as shown in Table 6, Special Day Class (SDC) students at Cupertino High occupy classrooms at 12 students per classroom for non-severe SDC classes, and 8 students per classroom for severe SDC classes. The State maximum for SDC classroom loading is 13 student per classroom for non-severe SDC classrooms, and 9 students per classroom for severe SDC students. Given these assumptions regarding classroom loading, Cupertino High has a capacity of 1,568 students, even with most classes having an average of32 students. This capacity is approximately equal to (greater by 26 students) the current Cupertino High 2004-05 emollment of 1,542 students. Overcrowding exists at several FUHSD schools. At a 2004-2005 emollment of 1,542, Cupertino High is near theoretical emollment capacity. FUHSD has recently conducted a residency verification of all its students. As of May, 2005 the District estimates that approximately 250- 300 students will be "dis-emolled" for the 2005-2006 school year as a result of being ineligible due to residency. The initial estimate is that approximately 30-50 ofthese students will be ftom Cupertino High. As it stands now, an estimated net capacity gain of250-300 for the District, and 30-50 students for Cupertino High, will create additional capacity, but again will not alter the near capacity situation that currently exists. In addition, it will take approximately four years for the gradual passing of the baby boom echo generation ftom high school age to cause a reduction in emollrnent. (The District currently has a study underway to forecast future emollrnent, including the effect of this demographic transition.) CAPITAL COST IMPACTS Residential Development Impact Fee Revenue Both CUSD and FUHSD are eligible to levy Level I development impact fees on new residential and commercial/industrial development. There is currently a development impact fee revenue sharing agreement between FUHSD and its elementary feeder districts. The maximum Levell residential fee that CUSD and FUHSD are allowed to levy is $2.24 per square foot of residential development. Per the existing fee revenue agreement between the elementary and high school districts, FUHSD is allowed to collect 40% of$2.24, or $0.90, per square foot ofresidential development. CUSD is allowed to collect 60% of $2.24, or $1.34, per square foot of residential development. California Govemment Code section 65995.I(a) stipulates that the development of residential units for senior housing will be charged only the commercial/industrial rate, which is examined in the next section. Both District's are still collecting at rates based on the previous 2004 maximum fee level of $2.14 per square foot, but are in the process of bringing their fees up to the maximum allowable. As stated previously, Landmark Properties Management LLC, Inc. has provided Town Hall Services with tentative site plans that show the breakout of unit types and sizes for the Valko Residences project. Table 7 shows the development impact fees that would be generated by the Town Hall Services 8 November, 2005 Y - I ti-'-/- Citv of Cuvertino Val/co Prooerties Deve/ooment Imoact Ana/vsis Val1co Residences project, which includes the development impact fee for the Below Market Rate (BMR) senior housing units which are levied at the commerciallindustrial fee level. Table 7 Development Impact Fees Number of Square Feet Total CUSD CUSD FUHSD FUHSD Total Units Per Unit S uare Feet Fee Fee Total Fee Fee Total Fees One Bedroom 13 675 8,775 $ 1.34 $11,759 $0,90 $7,898 $19,657 Two Bedroom 117 950 111,150 $ 1.34 $148,941 $0.90 $100,035 $248,976 Three Bedroom 26 1,273 33,098 $ 1.34 $44,351 $0,90 $29,788 $74,139 Total 156 $205,051 $137,721 I $342,772 Source: Town Hall Services. CommerciallIndustrial Development Impact Fee Revenue Under California law, both districts are eligible to levy development impact fees on commerciaVindustrial development in addition to the fees being levied for residential development. The districts are each in the process of bringing their fees up to the maximum allowable $0.36 per square foot of commerciaVindustrial development. Currently, they are together levying $0.34 per square foot. The fee sharing agreement also governs the split of fee revenue fÌ'om non-residential development. Of the $0.36 maximum commerciaVindustrial fee, CUSD is allowed to collect 60%, or $0.22, per square foot, and FUHSD is allowed to collect 40%, or $0.14. CommerciaVindustrial fees generated within the districts have averaged four percent of residential fees through the last three years. The commerciaVindustrial fee revenue is sufficiently small, and associating a portion of it with the Val1co Residences project would not change the magnitude of the facilities costs impacts to either CUSD or FUHSD. Currently there is a paved parking lot on the site where the Vallco Residences project is proposed. In relationship to the new residential fees (Table 7) for the Val1co Residences units, the conversion of the site fÌ'om a commerciaVindustrial use, and associated commercial fees, will also be comparatively insignificant. Facilities Costs The cost for housing additional students at each ofthe impacted schools comes fÌ'om each District's existing Levell Development Impact Fee Justification Report. FUHSD's Fee Justification Report was completed in 2001 by Town Hall Services. CUSD's Fee Justification Report was completed in 2000 by School Facility Consultants. (Town Hall Services is now in the process of preparing an updated fee justification report.) Each ofthose reports identifies a Town Hall Services 9 November, 2005 4 -I L/<:; Citv of Cuvertino Vallco Proverties Develovment ImDact Analvsis per student cost to house enrollment generated as a result of new development. Because each of these reports is quite old, we have applied an adjustment of 21 % to the costs enumerated in those reports to bring the costs up to date. (At the time of both reports the Class B Construction Cost Index was 1.40. The State Office of Public Construction's current Class B Construction Cost Index is currently 1.70, 21 % higher.) Table 8 shows the calculation ofthe difference between the development impact fees likely to be generated by the Valleo Residences projects given the current project proposal and the Construction Cost Index adjusted facilities costs per student for each of the districts. The table shows negative capital cost impacts for both districts. Table 8 Facilities Fees Versus Facilities Costs $6,835 $15,302 Facilities Cost Per Student Per Student* Cost Difference Students $9,317 -$2,482 30 $24,478 -$9,176 9 Total Facilities Cost Impact Fee Revenue Per Student CUSD FUHSD -$74,460 -$82,584 *FUHSD fee report completed by Town Hall Services in 2001, CUSD fee report completed by School Facility Consultants in 2000. Source: Town Hall Services and existing CUSD and FUHSD Fee Justification Report. OPERATIONAL REVENUE AND COST IMPACTS Operating Revenues The Valleo Residences project will affect the revenues and costs for the two districts, however, in very different ways. CUSD is currently a "revenue limit" district. Like the overwhelming majority of revenue limit districts in the state, its property tax revenues are not sufficient to reach the per student amounts guaranteed under the State of California school funding program. Therefore the State supplies the additional funds necessary to fill the gap up to the guaranteed level. The result is that the revenues from property taxes plus the revenue limit program funding increases proportionately as enrollment increases. Another reality for a revenue limit district is that the increase in property tax revenue from new homes is offset by a comparable reduction in the money from the State. The "revenue limit" total for CUSD for 2003-2004 was $70,863,543, or $4,351 per student. The State and the Federal Government also supply other funding, generally for categorical programs, and these also tend to increase as enrollment increases. The operating revenue,s from these sources totaled $1,336 per student in CUSD for the 2003-2004 fiscal year. Thus, the per student revenue impact corning from sources that will increase approximately proportionate to the addition of new students resulting from the Valleo Residences project is $5,687. Local Town Hall Services 10 November, 2005 4 r I Lffc, City of CUDertino Valleo PrOlJerties DeveloDment ImDact Analvsis revenues (other than the property tax) constitute a far smaller source of funds; they totaled $8,783,260 or $539 per student. Some examples oflocal revenue sources are interest income and rental/lease income. These revenues are not likely to increase with additional enrollment. FUHSD is one of the relatively few districts in the state that is not a revenue limit district. The District's per student property tax is moderately above the amount of per student revenue limit funding guaranteed by the State. State revenue does not increase when additional students are enrolled. However, new homes generate additional property taxes, increasing the District's revenues. Table 9 shows the calculation of the assumed assessed valuation and property tax calculation for the proposed Vallco Residences project, based on tentative estimates from Landmark Properties Management LLC, Inc. It should be noted that actual market prices paid for the units will determine what the final assessed valuation for the 156 Vallco Residences units will be. Table 9 Estimated Assessed Valuation and Property Tax Valko Residences Development Total 9 8 2 2 156 Estimated Assessed Sales Price Valuation $500,000 $5,500,000 $575,000 $57,500,000 $675,000 $14,850,000 $178,000 $178,000 $232,000 $232,000 $208,000 $1,872,000 $269,000 $2,152,000 $238,000 $476,000 $306,000 $612,000 $83,372,000 Number of Units Three Bedroom 11 100 22 One Bedroom Two Bedroom BMR Units-One Bedroom-Median Income BMR Units-One Bedroom-Moderate Income BMR Units-Two Bedroom-Median Income BM~ Units-Two Bedroom-Moderate I/lcome BMR Units-Three Bedroom-Median I/lcome BMR Units-Three Bedroom-Moderate Income Property Tax Rate (1.0%) $833,720 FUHSD Share of Tax Rate (17.6%) $146,735 FUHSD Share of Tax Rate per FUHSD Student $9,171 Source: Landmark Properties Managemellt LLC, file. estimate of unit sales prices, and the City of Cupertino's BMR housillg program stalldards for a low~illcome Olle bedroom unit. In November 2004 voters in the Fremont Union High School District approved Measure L, a parcel tax of $98 per parcel. The 156 Vallco Residences homes will generate $15,288 in additional funds per year for the approved duration of the parcel tax. Town Hall Services 11 November, 2005 4 -( '-17 Citv of Cuvertino Vallco Proverties Develovment Imvact Analvsis As with the CUSD, local revenues (other than the property tax) constitute a far smaller source of funds; they totaled $5,105,264 or $530 per student. In general, these revenues are not likely to increase with additional enrollment. Thus, the per student revenue impact is calculated to be the $8,858 per student received from property and parcel taxes. Table 10 shows the operational revenue anticipated for additional students as a result of the Vallco Residences project. Given recent information about home sales in the District, it is likely that when the units are completed and ready for sale, the estimated per unit sales price will be higher than the figures indicated in Table 9. Therefore, we are providing an estimated assessed valuation in Table 10, and subsequent operational revenue and cost calculation, for a "higher estimated sales price", should real estate market conditions in the District continue strong growth. Table 10 Higher Estimated Assessed Valuation and Property Tax Valko Residences Development Total 9 8 2 2 156 Higher Estimated Assessed Sales Price (+15%) Valuation $575,000 $6,325,000 $661,250 $66,125,000 $747,500 $16,445,000 $178,000 $178,000 $232,000 $232,000 $208,000 $1,872,000 $269,000 $2,152,000 $238,000 $476,000 $306,000 $612,000 $94,417,000 Number of Units Two Bedroom 11 100 22 One Bedroom Three Bedroom BMR Units-One Bedroom-Median Income BMR Units-One Bedroom·Moderate Income BMR Units-Two Bedroom-Median Income BMR Units-Two Bedroom-Moderate Income BMR Units- Three Bedroom-Median Income BMR Units-Three Bedroom-Moderate Income Property Tax Rute (1.0%) $944,170 FUHSD Shure of Tax Rute (17.6%) $166,174 FUHSD Shure o(Tax Rute per FUHSD Student $10,386 Source: Landmark Properties Management LLC, Inc. estimate of UlÛt sales prices, and the City of Cupertino's BMR housÎllg program standards for a low-income. Operating Costs Almost all operating costs tend to increase with enrollment if educational standards are maintained. These costs include personnel costs like salaries and benefits for certificated and classified employees, which generally comprise a large majority of a district's budget. Therefore, the cost per student is simply a calculation of the revenue available for operating Town Hull Services 12 November, 2005 4- -14-« Citv of Cuvertino Val/co Proverties Develovment fmoact Analvsis expenditures divided by the number of students. Table II shows the operational costs anticipated for additional students as a result of the Vallco Residences project. Table 11 Operational Costs Versus Operational Revenues FUHSD FUHSD CUSD Current A V Higher A V Assumption Students 30 9 9 Revenues State and Federal Funding Per Student $5,687* FUHSD Share of Property Tax $146,735 $166,174 FUHSD Measure L Parcel Tax ($98) $15,288 $15,288 Total Revenues $170,610 $162,023 $181,462 Revenue Per Student $5,687 $18,003 $20,162 Costs Average Cost Per Student $6,226* $7,804*' $7,804** Total Costs $186,780 $70,236 $70,236 Net Fiscal Impact Totallmpact -$16,170 $91,787 $111,226 Per Student Impact -$539 $10,199 $12,358 *Revenues and costs deriÞed from the CUSD Second Interim Budget June, 2004 report; expenditures per student are assumed equal to total current reÞenue per student. **Current aÞerage cost 'per student for Cupertino High provided by FUHSD staff. Source: Town Hall Services Net Operating Impact There is a net fiscal loss (-$539 per student) for CUSD as a result of the additional students from the Vallco Residences project. This reflects the assumption that state and federal revenues will increase along with the increased emollment, but revenues from local sources in general will not. In addition, the current operational cost assumption of $6,226 per student is an. average cost per pupil for all expenditures. At current estimated assessed valuations there is a net fiscal gain of $1 0, 199 per student for FUHSD in providing services to an additional 9 students as a result ofthe Vallco Residences project. Ifreal estate market costs continue to increase as project completion gets nearer, it is likely that a higher per unit sales price will result in the creation of a benefit of perhaps $12,358 per student as a result of the 9 additional students from the Vallco Residences project. Town Hall Services 13 November, 2005 1f~ILf9 Citv of Cuvertino Val/co ProDerties DeveloDment ¡mDaet Analvsis SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The projected emollment and fiscal impacts resulting from the development of 156 single family attached housing units (Valko Residences) have been analyzed. These impacts were analyzed using current emollment and financial infonnation data for CUSD and FUHSD in general, and the affected schools, specifically, Collins Elementary, Lawson Middle, and Cupertino High. The enrollment impacts analyzed in this report describe the expected impact within three to ten years of the Vallco Residences development completion, generally assuming current conditions. However, conditions will change and influence student generation in CUSD and FUHSD. In particular, changes in demographics can impact enrollment capacity within the Districts. For instance, we are currently nearing then end of a period commonly referred to as the "baby boom echo" period, whereby some of the children of the baby boom generation are still emolled in high school. High school enrollment will decline in a few years as the end of the baby boom echo graduates. Shifts in the birth rate can also impact future enrollment. The State of California Department of Finance predicts a moderate increase in the birth rate in the coming years. The capacity issues facing each of the three affected schools as a result of the Valko Residences proj ect will change in the future as demographic shifts occur in the districts. Changes in policies within the districts can also affect emollment into the future. Again, due to capacity concerns and the amount of inter-district transfers at the high schools, FUSHD is currently in the process of a residency verification process. Because of the desirability of FUHSD schools, some students ITom outside of the District attend FUHSD schools. Therefore, there will be a reduction in total enrollment at FUHSD schools in the near future as a result of the emollment verification process, thus impacting emollment capacity. Below is a summary ofthe significant findings contained in this report. o An analysis of recent single family housing in the Cupertino area (Table 1 and Table 2) indicates that appropriate SGR's for the Valko Residences 156 unit development are; 0.19 for CUSD, and 0.10 for the for FUHSD. The SGR's are shown in Table 4. o Based on the SGRs, an enrollment impact of 39 total students is estimated as a result of the Val1co Residences project: 21 students at Collins Elementary (3.50 students per grade), 9 students at Lawson Middle (3.00 students per grade), and 9 students at Cupertino High (2.25 students per grade). The total per grade emollment impact is 3.00 students per grade. The projected enrollment is shown in Table 5. o CUSD has completed or has planned near-tenn modernizations, renovations, and boundary adjustments that will result in adequate capacity for the Collins and Lawson students. For FUHSD, the District as a whole is overcrowded and is operating at a student per class ratio that is educationally undesirable, and the Cupertino campus likely Town Hall Services 14 -:;I) November. 2005 Ib +~ Citv of Cupertino VaIleo Proverties Develomnent Imvact Analvsis had a historical students per class ratio far less than the current student per classroom ratio of 32: I. Capacity calculations are show in Table 6. o Facilities costs per student are anticipated to exceed facilities fee revenue per student at CUSD (-$2,482 per student) and FUHSD (-$9,176 per student), or a total facilities cost deficit of -$74,460 for CUSD and -$82,584 for FUHSD. o Operational costs are anticipated to exceed operational revenue at the impacted CUSD schools (Collins Elementary and Lawson Middle) by -$539. At the impacted FUHSD school (Cupertino High) there will be a net benefit of $1 0, 199 per student using current assessed values, and under higher assessed valuations the impact becomes $12,358 per FUHSD student if real estate market conditions continue to rise as the proposed project nears completion. Total operational costs are projected to be a deficit of -$16,170 for Collins Elementary and Lawson Middle combined, and a surplus of $91,787 (current assessed values), and $111,226 (higher assessed values) for Cupertino High if real estate conditions continue to improve. CUMULATIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS The City of Cupertino has requested that this analysis include, in addition to the analysis for the Toll Brother's Calabazas Place development, a cumulative analysis of the fiscal and enrollment impacts of the project combined with other projects that are either under plan review or have been approved and are under construction. Those other projects (and the project developer) are; Metropolitan at Cupertino (Menlo Equities), Vallco Rosebowl (Vallco Properties), Pruneridge Avenue (Morley Brothers), and Calabazas Place (Vallco Properties). This section assesses the aggregated net enrollment, capital facilities cost, and operational cost impacts as a result of all of these projects. Appendix C shows the fiscal and enrollment impacts of each project, and provides an aggregated analysis of the impacts of those projects as a whole. Town Hall Services completed analyses similar to this one for Vallco Residences project: Pruneridge Avenue, and Calabazas Place projects. Although the Metropolitan and Vallco Rosebowl projects were not similarly analyzed, information was obtained that have allowed us to calculate the estimated impacts ofthose two previously approved projects, and to include them in our analysis of the cumulative fiscal and enrollment impacts. Cumulative Enrollment Impacts The forecasted school enrollment impacts as a result of the five residential development projects all occur in the Cupertino Union Elementary and Fremònt Union High School Districts, and impact schools individually based upon the school attendance area in which Town Hall Services 15 November, 2005 if-i '51 Citv of CUDertino Vallco ProDerties DeveloDment ImDact Analvsis the residential development is situated. The net emollment impact to CUSD and FUHSD schools are as follows: 188 new students in the CUSD elementary schools (grades K-5), 80 new students in CUSD middle schools (grades 6-8), and 95 new students to FUHSD high schools (grades 9-12). Appendix C shows these figures and the impacts of the projects per grade level and per school. It is difficult to assess the emollment versus capacity impacts ofthese projects. As is stated in the previous Enrollment Capacity of Impacted School section of this report, the emollment of the impacted CUSD elementary and middle schools was unknown at the time the report was prepared due to the alteration of the attendance boundaries (Collins Elementary and Lawson Middle) of the schools where this project lies. However, staff have analyzed the situation and concluded that district schools, with modest additions if needed, will be adequate to accommodate students from the proposed projects. FUHSD is concerned about emollment impacts district wide (but their concern is focused primarily on any projects that might be in the Monta Vista School attendance area) and primarily over next few years as they anticipate some emollment decline as the baby boom echo student pass from the high schools. All ofthe five projects analyzed here located within the Cupertino High School attendance area, and therefore impact emollment at that school. Cumulative Capital Facilities Cost Impacts The cumulative net facilities cost impacts for the five projects analyzed is (-$755,609) for the Cupertino Union School District. On a per student facilities cost basis, the average per student facilities cost impact is (-$3,054) for CUSD. The greatest impacts result from the Calabazas Place project, with a total project facilities cost impact of (-$205,275) and the Bungalow Courts project with a per student facilities cost impact of(-$3,771) for CUSD. The cumulative net facilities cost impacts for the six projects analyzed is (-$1,452,034) for the Fremont Union High School District. On a per student facilities cost basis, the average per student facilities cost impact is (-$12,250) for FUHSD. The greatest facilities cost impacts for FUHSD arise from the Calabazas project with a total project facilities costs impact of (-$410,970) and from the Metropolitan project with a per student impact of(-$13,911). Cumulative Fiscal Operatiug Cost Impacts The cumulative net fiscal operating cost impacts for the five projects analyzed is . (-$139,062) for CUSD, with the greatest impact being Calabazas Place (-$56,595). The per student projected operating impact is (-$539). The deficit reflects the assumption that Town Hall Services 16 November, 2005 ' Lf ~ I 5-2-- City of Cuvertino Val/co ProDerties Develovrnent IrnDact Analvsis there are certain local revenues that will not increase proportionately with the emollment generated from new development. In contrast to the elementary district, FUHSD revenues are affected by increases in the property taxes. The District is projected to have net revenue (revenue after deducting costs) of ($791 ,492) under current assessed values, and ($961,338) under higher estimated assessed values. On a per student fiscal operating cost impacts, the average per student operating cost impact is $5,387 for FUHSD under current assessed values, and $7,094 under higher estimated assessed values. With regard to specific projects, the District is projected to receive net revenues from the Calabazas Place project of ($558,202) under current assessed values, and ($642,027) under higher estimated assessed values. It is clear that it is the size of the Calabazas project that causes it to have both the largest negative facilities cost impact and the largest high school operating surplus. It should be noted that the cumulative impacts are aggregations of our individual project analyses using the assumptions contained in those reports, and represent the development composition at the time plans were approved (Metropolitan and Vallco Rosebowl) or where they are currently in the plan review process. It is possible that the development composition ofthe projects that are currently under plan review may be altered, resulting in the data assumptions which were used as the basis for these calculations being changed. Town Hall Services 17 November, 2005 Y'~153 Vallco Condominiums Air Quality Impact Report Cupertino, California November 21, 2005 . . . Prepared for: Aki Honda Community Development Dept. City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Prepared by: James A. Reyff ILUNGWORTH&RoDKIN,INC. 111,. Acoustics· Air Quality .'I/f 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, CA 94952 (707) 766-7700 Job No.: 05-194AQ t{-I çtf Introduction This report is an assessment of the air quality impacts occurring at the proposed Condominiums at Vallco Project proposed in Cupertino, California. This project, named Condominiums at Valleo, would involve the construction of about 156 dwelling units in six 3-story buildings on a 5.2-acre site near Wolfe Road. The site is located just west of Wolfe Road and south of Interstate 280 (1-280. The site is bounded by single-family residences to the west, 1-280 and the 1-280 southbound off-ramp to Wolfe Road on the north, the 1-280 off ramp and Wolfe Road on the east, and Valleo shopping Center to the south. The closest residences are located about 35 feet ITom the closest proposed buildings. The project proposes to develop multi-family residential uses near Interstate 280 (1-280). The size of the project is below the BAAQMD screening threshold for projects with potentially significant emissions; and therefore, project emissions were not evaluated (page 25, BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines)'. The traffic on 1-280 is a substantial source of air pollutant emissions. In particular are emissions of diesel particulate matter (DPM), which is an air toxic contaminant due to its potential to cause cancer. Elevated concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) are also an indicator of air quality impacts ITom traffic, since it is directly emitted ITom vehicular and found at highest concentrations near areas of high traffic volumes. This assessment describes the impacts of air pollution emitted ITom 1-280 traffic, in tenus of DPM and CO on proposed residences of the project. The assessment also evaluates the impact of project construction activities to air quality at adjacent existing residences. This report presents the results of the environmental noise impact assessment conducted for multi-family residential project in Cupertino, California. A block masonry wall would separate the existing residences from the project. This report assesses the potential for noise impacts resulting ITom the project and presents mitigation measures that would reduce significant noise impacts. Setting Overall Regulatory Setting The Federal Clean Air Act governs air quality in the United States. In addition to being subject to federal requirements, air quality in California is also governed by more stringent regulations under the California Clean Air Act. At the Federal level, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) administers the Clean Air Act (CAA). The California Clean Air Act is administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) at the State level and by the Air Quality Management Districts at the regional and local levels. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) regulates air quality at the regional level, which includes the nine-county Bay Area. Criteria Air Pollutants & Effect Air quality studies generally focus on five pollutants that are most commonly measured and regulated: CO, 0" NO" S02, and suspended particulate, i.e., PM.. and PM",. Carbon Monoxide. CO, a colorless and odorless gas, interferes with the transfer of oxygen to the brain. It can cause dizziness and fatigue, and can impair central nervous system functions. CO is emitted almost exclusively from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Automobile exhausts release approximately 70 percent of the CO in the Bay Area. A substantial amount also comes ITom burning wood in fireplaces 'BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines - Assessing the Air Quality Impacts of Projects and Plans. 1996, revised December 1999 . Available at http://www.baaqmd.gov/pln/ceqalindex.htm Lfr (C:;S- and wood stoves. CO is a non-reactive air pollutant that dissipates relatively quickly, so ambient CO concentrations generally follows the spatial and temporal distributions of vehicular traffic. The highest CO concentrations measured in the Bay Area are typically recorded during the winter. Ozone. 0" a colorless toxic gas, is the chief component of urban smog. 0, enters the blood stream and interferes with the transfer of oxygen, depriving sensitive tissues in the heart and brain of oxygen. Although 0, is not directly emitted, it fonns in the atmosphere through a chemical reaction between reactive organic gas (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) under sunlight.' ROG and NOx are primarily emitted ITom automobiles and industrial sources. 0, is present in relatively high concentrations within the Bay Area, and the damaging effects of photochemical smog are generally related to the concentration of 0,. Highest 0, concentrations occur during summer and early autumn, on days with low wind speeds or stagnant air, wann temperatures, and cloudless skies. This pollutant is addressed at the regional leveL Nitrogen Dioxide. NO" a reddish-brown gas, irritates the lungs. It can cause breathing difficulties at high concentrations. Like A" NO, is not directly emitted, but is fanned through a reaction between nitric oxide (NO) and atmospheric oxygen. NO and NO, are collectively referred to as nitrogen oxides (NO,) and are major contributors to 0, fonnation. NO, also contributes to the fonnation ofPMIO (see discussion ofPMJO below). NO, concentrations in the Bay Area are relatively low and do not warrant analysis ITom land use type projects. Sulfur Oxides. Sulfur oxides, primarily SO" are a product of high-sulfur fuel combustion. The main sources of SO, are coal and oil used in power stations, in industries, and for domestic heating. SO, is an irritant gas that attacks the throat and lungs. It can cause acute respiratory symptoms and diminished ventilator function in children. SO, concentrations have been reduced to levels well below the state and national standards, but further reductions in emissions are needed to attain compliance with standards for PMJO, of which SO, is a contributor. In the Bay Area, SO, is primarily an issue for oil refining. Susoended Particulate Matter. Particulate matter pollution consists of very small particles suspended in the air, which can include smoke, soot, dust, salts, acids, and metals. Particulate matter also fonns when industry and gaseous pollutant undergo chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Respirable particulate matter (PMJO) and fine particulate matter (PM",) represent ITactions of particulate matter. PMJO refers to particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter and PM,.5 refers to particulate matter that is 2.5 microns or less in diameter. Major sources of PM", results primarily ITom diesel fuel combustion (trom motor vehicles, power generation, industrial facilities), residential fireplaces, and wood stoves. PMJO include all PM,.5 sources as well as emissions ITom dust generated by construction, landfills, and agriculture; wildfires and brush/waste burning, industrial sources, windblown dust ITom open lands, and atmospheric chemical and photochemical reactions. PMJO and PM,.5 pose a greater health risk than larger-size particles, because these tiny particles can penetrate the human respiratory system's natural defenses and damage the respiratory tract increasing the nwnber and severity of asthma attacks, cause or aggravate bronchitis and other lung diseases, and reduce the body's ability to fight infections. Whereas, larger particles tend to collect in the upper portion of the respiratory system, PM,.5 are so tiny that they can penetrate deeper into the lungs and damage lung tissues. Suspended particulates also damage and discolor surfaces on which they settle, as well as produce haze and reduce regional visibility. Toxic Air Contaminants Toxic air contaminants (TAC) are a broad class of compounds known to cause morbidity or mortality (usually because they cause cancer) and include, but are not limited to, the criteria air pollutants listed above. T ACs are found in ambient air, especially in urban areas, and are caused by industry, agriéulture, fuel combustion, and commercial operations (e.g., dry cleaners). TACs are typically found in low 2 ROG and NOx are emitted from automobiles and industrial sources. 2 ~ -/5to concentrations, even near their source (e.g., benzene near a freeway). Because chronic exposure can result in adverse health effects, TACs are regulated at the regional, state, and federal level. Diesel exháust is the predominant TAC in urban air and is estimated to represent about two-thirds of the cancer risk from TACs (based on the statewide average). According to the CARE, diesel exhaust is a complex mixture of gases, vapors and fine particles. This complexity makes the evaluation of health effects of diesel exhaust a complex scientific issue. Some of the chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and fonnaldehyde, have been previously identified as T ACs by the CARB, and are listed as carcinogens either under the state's Proposition 65 or under the federal Hazardous Air Pollutants programs. California has adopted a comprehensive diesel risk reduction program. The U.S. EP A and CARE have adopted low sulfur diesel fuel standards that will reduce diesel particulate matter substantially. These go into effect in June 2006. Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Project DPM Exposure Background Risk Since identifying diesel particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant, the CARE has conducted studies to identifY existing health effects from exposure to DPM. The CARE has identified the average year 2000 statewide potential cancer risks at 540 excess cases per million people'. The potential risk near high volume freeways was found to be much higher. The risk is predicted to decrease in the future due to plans to reduce diesel particulate matter emissions from a variety of sources. The 2000 CARE report predicts an average statewide risk at 360 excess cancer cases per million people in 2020. Modeling infonnation compiled by CARE indicates that the cancer risk due to DPM in Cupertino is about 500 excess cases per million people'. Analvsis of Site-Specific DPM Cancer Risk This analysis involved the development of future DPM emissions for traffic on 1-280 using the latest version of the CARE EMFAC2002 emission factor model with defaults for Santa Clara County. DPM emissions are anticipated to decrease in the future. Since this analysis assesses the risk of proposed residences to future exposures, the lower future emissions were taken into account. The EMF AC results were then adjusted to the traffic mix on 1-280 reported by Caltrans'. Emission factors were developed for 2010 and 2020, using the calculated mix of diesel-fueled vehicles. Dispersion modeling was conducted using the CAL3QHCR model, which is acceptable to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) for this type of analysis. A 5-year set of meteorological data for Mineta San José International Airport obtained from the BAAQMD was used in the modeling. Other inputs to the model included geometry (based on site plans, dated 10/24/2005), current traffic conditions reported by Caltrans for 1-280, and the DPM emission factors. The plan view showing the project and 1-280 are shown in Figure 1. Results of the modeling along with the inputs are provided in Table 1. Maximmn concentrations of DPM would occur at the first row of proposed senior housing closest to I' 3 -California Air Resources Board, Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel Fueled Engines and Vehicle, s2000. 4 -California Air Resources Board http://www.arb.ca.govltoxics/Cliíhllhrisklcncrinhl/riskmapviewfuU.hlm 5 -Callrans, Based on 2004 Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic on the California State Highway System- http://www.doLca.gov/hq/traffops/saferesrftrafdata/ 3 Lf~(57 280, where annual concentrations are predicted to be 0.01 microgram per cubic meter (µg/m3) or less. The maximum individual cancer risks were computed using the BAAQMD recommended cancer risk factor of 3 x 10.4 cancer cases per µg/m3 of diesel particulate matter, which are based on "best estimates" of plausible cancer potencies as determined by the California Office Of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Over the course of a 70-year lifetime exposure, the incremental risk is calculated to about 3.6 excess cancer cases per million people at the first row of proposed residences. ,The DPM concentrations decrease at positions further from the freeway. Under the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, an incremental risk ofless than ten cases per million at the Maximally Exposed Individual or MEI (in this case being proposed residences near Interstate 280) would result in a less-than-significant impact. It should be noted that this assessment was based on existing traffic levels on 1-280 since future projections were not available. The volume of diesel trucks would have to triple in the near future for the impact to become significant, which is unlikely. Project Carbon Monoxide Exposure Carbon monoxide is an air pollutant that is directly emitted from combustion sources (e.g., automobiles) that concentrations can be modeled and compared with ambient air quality standards. Carbon monoxide emissions from 1-280 traffic were predicted where the closest proposed senior housing units would be located. There are 1- and 8-hour standards for carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide concentrations were modeled using the Caline4 Line-Source dispersion model. Peak-hour traffic volumes, carbon monoxide emission rates, meteorological conditions, and the roadway/receptor geometry were used as input. For this assessment, meteorological conditions most conducive for high carbon monoxide concentrations in the Bay Area, peak-hour traffic conditions (i.e., evening period), slow traffic speeds and emission factors generated by the CARE emission factor model (i.e., EMF AC2002) were used as input to the model. Modeled concentrations were added to background levels to predict total carbon monoxide concentrations. This assessment was conducted for 20 I 0 conditions. Results are shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 4, existing 8-hour Carbon Monoxide levels for exposures at about 100 feet from the freeway would be below California Ambient Air Quality Standards used as CEQA thresholds. Emissions rates are forecasted to decrease substantially in the future; therefore, carbon monoxide levels are predicted to remain below ambient air quality standards with the project. As a result, exposure of project residences to carbon monoxide from 1-280 would be considered a less-than-significant impact. Project Construction Dust from Demolitions and Grading During demolition, grading and construction activities, dust would be generated. Most of the dust would result during grading activities. The amount of dust generated would be highly variable and is dependent on the size of the area disturbed, amount of activity, soil conditions and meteorological conditions. Typical winds during late spring through summer are from the north. Given the close proximity to the project, nearby residences could be adversely affected by dust generated during construction activities. Although grading and construction activities would be temporary, they would have the potential to cause both nuisance and health air quality impacts. PM" is the pollutant of greatest concern associated with dust. Ifuncontrolled, PM" levels downwind of actively disturbed areas could possibly exceed State standards. In addition, dust fall on adjacent properties could be a nuisance. If uncontrolled, dust generated by demolition, grading and construction activities represents a potentially significant impact. 4 If--- rS~ Mitigation Measure Include measures to control dust emissions. Implementation of the measures recommended by the BAAQMD and listed below would reduce the air quality impacts associated with grading and new construction to a less than significant level: I. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods. Active areas adjacent to residences should be kept damp at all times. 2, Cover all hauling trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. Dust-proof chutes shall be used as appropriate to load debris onto trucks during demolition. 3. Pave, apply water at least twice daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas. 4. Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas and sweep streets daily (with water sweepers) if visible soil material is deposited onto the adjacent roads. 5. Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (i.e., previously- graded areas that are inactive for 10 days or more). 6. Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil binders to exposed stockpiles. 7. Limit traffic speeds on any unpaved roads to 15 mph. 8. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 9. Suspend construction activities that cause visible dust plumes to extend beyond the construction site. 10. Limit the area subject to excavation, grading and other construction activity at anyone time 11. During renovation and demolition activities, removal or disturbance of any materials contains asbestos, lead paint or other hazardous pollutants will be conducted in accordance with BAAQMD rules and regulations Construction Eauioment Exhaust Exhaust from construction equipment and associated heavy-duty truck traffic emits diesel particulate matter, which is a known Toxic Air Contaminant. The BAAQMD has not developed any procedures or guidelines for identifying these impacts from temporary construction activities where emissions are transient. They are typically evaluated for stationary sources (e.g., large compression ignition engines such as generators) in health risk assessments that evaluate lifetime exposures (i.e., 24 hours per day over 70 years). Although temporary, diesel exhaust from construction equipment poses both a health and nuisance impact to nearby receptors. These construction activities are expected to occur during a relatively short time, and therefore, the impacts are considered to be less than significant if reasonable available control measures are applied. Mitigation Measures: Include measures to reduce diesel particulate matter exhaust from construction equipment. 5 (-1-/59 I. Opacity is an indicator of exhaust particulate emissions from off-road diesel powered equipment. The project shall ensure that emissions rrom all construction diesel powered equipment used on the project site do not exceed 40 percent opacity for more than three minutes in anyone hour. Any equipment found to exceed 40 percent opacity (or Ringelmann 2.0) shall be repaired irmnediately 2. The contractor shall install temporary electrical service whenever possible to avoid the need for independently powered equipment (e.g. compressors). 3. Diesel equipment standing idle for more than two minutes shall be turned off. This would include trucks waiting to deliver or receive s6il, aggregate, or other bulk materials. Rotating drum concrete trucks could keep their engines running continuously as long as they were onsite and away rrorn residences. 4. Properly tune and maintain equipment for low emissions. 6 y.-' I~O Figure 1 Condominiums at Vallco Modeling Source and Receptor Locations Vallco Residences <4131 587500 587700 587800 566900 56-7000 587100 58;200 7 Lf~/!Pr Table 1 CAL3QHCR Modeling Assumptions and Results 1-280 DPM Risk Modeling at Proposed VaUea Residences Using CaJ3qhcr A'\'erage Hourly Traffic VolUDles Roadwav Information Number of Lanes = 8 (4 each direction) Lane Width = 12 feet 2010 1010 2010 2020 2020 2020 Do.i{1' Traffic Vol.urne VechIDal' % Diesel Nð.Diesel JlechIDa ' % Diesel No. Diesel 10A 990435 0.17% 168 99,435 0,00% 0 10T 46.793 0.1'2% 338 46.793 0.68% 318 MHT 2,298 2.44% 56 2,:198 1.14% 26 HDT 2,474 51.00% 1:86 2,474 59.09% 1462 Total 151000 1.:22% 1,849 151,000 1.20% 1,806 CAL30HC LinklSource Informaiion DP1H Emission Facton; Num of Links. = 2 Model EMFAC2002 Link Lengtb = variable County SantaCJara LinkWîdth= 68 feel Source height = 0 .", Dìesel VehcleSlbour = 39 per link: 2010 Avenne Emission Factof'S Speed DP,v EF (»'mi) (-") LDA 10T MIlD HHD VeIL WeiuhtedAverane 55 - - 0.138 0.0958 60 - - 0.029 0.0009 65 0.088 0.042 - - 0.0157 -~- - , - ~- --- -- - -- ·-'0.1U3 <-~Tótãl 2020 Averaoe Emission Factors Speed DPM EF (g/miJ (=h) LDA LDT lldRD HHD JleA.. WeillhtedAv01lge 55 - - - 0.076 0.0615 60 - - 0.018 0.0004 65 0.061 0.038 - - 0.006; O,tJ686 <-Total Receotor Information Number of Receptors 53 Receptor distances = variable, minimum distance approx. 250 ft. Meteorolol!'ical Conditions San Jose Aírport 1992-1995 & 1997 Hourly Met Data Stability class = variable Wind speed = variable Wmddirection= variable Surface roughness ,. 150 em Cancer Risk Calculations l'¥1uimum Minimum. DPM Concentration :\'leteoroJogical DPM CODceolration {u"/m~ ,. m'} Data Year 2010 2020 2010 2020 1992 0.0188 0.Oll5 0.0065 0_0040 1993 0.0171 0.0105 0.0058 0,0036 1994 0.0188 0.0116 0.0063 0_0038 1995 0.0173 0.0106 0.0058 0.0036 1997 0_0186 0.0114 0_0065 0.0040 Average 0.0181 0.0111 0.006 0.004 CancerRisk' 5A 3.3 1.9 1.1 70-Tl' Cnmulath'e Riskb 3.6 1.2 Notes: Maximum concallfalÎons occur at Receptor No_ 1 (closest t(l highway, northeast comC'l' of[esii!c-u=) MiDímum conC(ßlr3tion oc= at Receptor 3:3 (soudrwest com~ (If[c-sîdc-nces) k«ptor- Hright = U: m a Canc~ risk cak\llated assumiug coastant 70-year c-xposure to conœDlfaj(IQ for Y-C;If of analysis... b CIDIIll1atio,'e cancer risk calculated assumiog'\'3riab1t exposul'f ower a lO-yael: period due to decreased concentrations over Urnc-. 8 Lf,/ {p ?-- Table 2 Predicted Worst Case Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Resulting from 1-280 Traffic (in PPM)* I-Hour Level 8-Hour Level Descri tiou Closest Proposed Housing along 1-280 - 100 feet from near lane Significance Thresholds CAA S * Includes background level of 6 ppm for I-hour exposure and 4.0 ppm for 8-hour exposures 7ppm 4.8 ppm 20 ppm 9,0 ppm 9 L/,.-/(.,3 Valleo Condominium Project Noise Impact Report Cupertino, California November 15, 2005 . . . Prepared for: Aki Honda Community Development Dept. City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Prepared by: James A. Reyff IWNGWQRTH&RooKlN,INC. 11111 Acoustics, Air Quality 111/1 505 Peta]uma Bou]evard South Petaluma, CA 94952 (707) 766-7700 Job No.: 05-]94 4~I/PLf INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the environmental noise impact assessment conducted for a multi-family residential project in Cupertino, California. This project, named Condominiums at Vallco, would involve the construction of about 156 dwelling units in six 3-story buildings on a 5.2-acre site near Wolfe Road. The site is located just west of Wolfe Road and south of Interstate 280 (1-280). The site is bounded by single-family residences to the west, the 1-280 southbound off-ramp to Wolfe Road on the north, Wolfe Road on the east, and Vallco shopping Center to the south. The closest residences are located about 35 feet from the closest proposed buildings. A block masonry wall would separate the existing residences from the project. This report assesses the potential for noise impacts resulting from the project and presents mitigation measures that would reduce significant noise impacts. The Setting section of the report presents a discussion of the fundamentals of environmental acoustics to assist those unfamiliar with acoustical terminology. A description of state regulations and local guidelines is then presented to establish the regulatory criteria applicable in the noise impact assessment. The results of the noise monitoring survey conducted for the project are then presented. The Impact and Mitigation Measures section identifies project impacts, including substantial permanent or temporary noise level increases in the project vicinity that would occur as a result of the project. Where significant noise impacts are identified, mitigation measures to reduce the impacts are identified.- SETTING Fundamentals of Environmental Acoustics Noise maybe defmed as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave. ' In addition to the concepts of pitch and loudness, there are several noise measurement scales which are used to describe noise in a particular location. A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement which indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 decibels represents a ten-fold increase in acoustic energy, while 20 decibels is 100 times more intense, 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense, etc. There is a relationship between the subjective noisiness or loudness of a sound and its intensity. Each 10 decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities. Technical terms are defined in Table 1. There are several methods of characterizing sound. The most common in California is -the A- weighted sound level or dBA. This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. Representative outdoor and indoor noise levels in units 2 4~I("Ç of dBA are shown in Table 2. Because sound levels can vary markedly over a short period of time, a method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in tenns of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. The most common averaging period is hourly, but Leq can describe any series of noise events of arbitrary duration. The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus I dBA. Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends upon the distance the receptor is from the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus I to 2 dBA. Since the sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night -- because excessive noise interferes with the ability to sleep -- 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. The Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL, is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in a community, with a 5 dB penalty added to evening (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) and a 10 dB addition to nocturnal (10:00 pm - 7:00 am) noise levels. The DaylNight Average Sound Level, Ld", is essentially the same as CNEL, with the exception that the evening time period is dropped and all occurrences during this three-hour period are grouped into the daytime period. 3 4~1f.,~ Table 1 Definitions of Aconstical Terms Used in this Report Term Definitions Decibel, dB A unit describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure. The reference pressure for air is 20. SOlUld Pressure Level Sound pressure is the sound force per unit area, usually expressed in micro Pascals (or 20 micro Newtons per square meter), where 1 Pascal is the pressure resulting from a force of 1 Newton exerted over an area of I square meter. The sound pressure level is expressed in decibels as 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the pressures exerted by the sound to a reference sound pressure (e.g., 20 micro Pascals). Sound pressure level is the quantity that is directly measured by a sound level meter. Frequency, Hz The number of complete pressure fluctuations per second above and below atmospheric pressure. Normal hwnan hearing is between 20 Hz and 20.000 Hz. Infrasonic sound are below 20 Hz and Ultrasonic sounds are above 20,000 Hz. A-Weighted Sound The sotIDd pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A- Level, dBA weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very , high frequency components of the sound in amanner-similar to the· frequency response of the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise. Equivalent Noise The average A-weighted noise level during the measurement period. The hourly Leq Level, Leq used for this report is denoted as dBA L.,¡h]. Day-Night Level, Lw. Loo is the equivalent noise level for a continuous 24-hour period with a IO-decibel penalty imposed during nighttime and morning hours (10:00 pm to 7:00 am). Community Noise CNEL is the equivalent noise level for a continuous 24-hour period with a 5-decibel Exposure Level, penalty imposed in the evening (7:00 pm to 10:00 pm) and a 10-decibel penalty CNEL imposed during nighttime and morning hours (10:00 pm to 7:00am) Ll, LIO. Lso, L90 The A-weighted noise levels that are exceeded 1%, 10%, 50%, and 90% ofthe time during the measurement period. Ambient Noise Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. Intrusive That noise which intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. 4 L}' I ~ 1 Table 2 Typical Noise Levels in the Environment Common Outdoor Noise Source Common Indoór Noise Source 120 dB A Jet fly-over at 300 meters Rock concert 110 dBA Pile driver at 20 meters 100 dBA Night club with live music 90 dBA· Large truck pass by at 15 meters 80 dBA Noisy restaurant Garbage disposal at 1 meter Gas lawn mower at 30 meters 70 dBA Vacuum cleaner at 3 meters CommerciallUrban area daytime Normal speech at I meter Suburban expressway at 90 meters 60 dBA Suburban daytime Active office envirornnent 50 dBA Urban area nighttime Quiet office envirornnent 40 dBA Suburban nighttime Quiet rural areas 30 dBA Library Quiet bedroom at night Wilderness area 20 dBA Quiet recording studio lOdBA Threshold of human hearing OdBA Threshold of human hearing 5 tf,-\b~ State and Local Regulations California Environmenta/ Quality Act Under the California Envirorunental Quality Act (CEQA), potential noise effects from a project could be considered significant if any of the following occur: a. exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; b. exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground- borne noise levels; c. a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; d. a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; and e. expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels for a project- located· within, an· airport land- use, plan or where such a -plan- has, not- been, adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project. f. expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels for a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. CEQA does not define what noise level increase would be considered substantial. Typically, an increase in the Ldn noise level resulting from the project at noise sensitive land uses of 3 dBA or greater would be considered a significant impact when projected noise levels would exceed those considered satisfactory for the affected land use. The project would not generate excessive ground-bome vibration or noise levels and is not located in an envirorunent exposed to these impacts. The project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip or commercial airport, and therefore, would not subject future occupants to excessive aircraft noise. Title 24, Part 2 of the State Building Code Title 24, Part 2 of the State Building Code regulates environmental noise inside new multi- family housing projects. Projects exposed to an exterior Ldn of 60 dBA or greater shall incorporate the noise control treatments necessary to reduce the interior Ldn to 45 dBA or less. A report is required to be submitted to the Building Department with the building's plans, which delineates the noise control treatments incorporated in the project design necessary to achieve the interior noise limit. Noise Element of the City of Cupertino General Plan 6 L-t,fo0 The Noise Element establishes goals and policies designed to minimize noise exposure at noise sensitive land uses. Applicable goals and policies of the City of Cupertino are described below. ~Goal A Land Use Compatibility Strive to ensure a compatible noise environment for all existing and future land uses. Policy 6-24 Ùse Figures 6-K (Noise Contour Map), 6-L (Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments), 6-M (Equal Noise Level Contours) and the City Municipal Code to evaluate land use decisions. Multi-family residential uses are considered "nonnally acceptable" in noise environments up to 65 dB Ldn and" conditionally acceptable" in environments up to 70 dB Ldn. In a noise environment between 70 and 75 dB Ldn, multi-family residential land uses are considered "nonnally unacceptable". Above 75 dB Ldn, this land use is considered "clearly unacceptable". Playgrounds and neighborhood parks are considered "nonnally acceptable" in noise environments up to 70 dB Ldn. [¡Goal B Transportation Noise Work to reduce the noise impact of major streets and freeways upon Cupertino. ¡¡Goal C Non-Transportation Noise Sources Protect residential areas as much as possible from intrusive noise generated by sources other than traffic. Policy 6-34 Be sure new commercial or industrial developments plan their delivery areas so they are away from existing or planned homes. Continue active enforcement of Section 10.45 of the Municipal Code limiting commercial and industrial delivery hours adjoining residential uses. Continue to restrict non-emergency building construction work near homes during evening, early morning, and weekends. Policy 6-31 Policy 6-32 [¡Goal D Noise Attenuation Encourage techniques to diminish nOIse wherever they can produce practical and desirable results. Noise Ordinance Chapter 10.48: Community Noise Control, of the City Municipal Code establishes regulations and standards regarding noise. Regulations applicable to the proposed project are listed below. 10.48.40 Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels 7 1-/ ~I Î 0 Individual noise sources, or the combination of a group of noise sources located on the same property, shall not produce a noise level exceeding those specified on property zoned as follows, unless specifically provided in another section of this chapter: Land Use at Location of Complaint Residential Nouresidential Maximum Noise Level on Receivin Ni httime Da ime 50 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 65 dBA 10.48.050 Brief Daytime Incidents During the daytime period only, brief noise incidents exceeding limits in other sections of this chapter are allowed, providing that the sum of the noise duration in minutes plus the excess noise level does not exceed 20 in a two-hour period. For example, the following combinations would be allowable: Noise Increment Above Noise Duration in Normal Standard Two-Hour Period 5-dBk-' , 1-5- Minutes- 10 dBA 10 Minutes 15 dBA 5 Minutes 19dBA I Minute 10.48.53 Grading, Construction and Demolition · Grading, construction and demolition activities shall be allowed to exceed the noise limits of Section 10.48.040 during daytime hours provided that the equipment utilized has high-quality noise muffler and abatement devices installed and in good condition, and the activity meets one of the following two criteria: (a) No individual device produces a noise level more than 87 dBA at a distance of25 feet (7.5 meters); or (b) The noise level on any nearby property does not exceed 80 dBA. · It is a violation of this chapter to engage in any grading, street construction, or underground utility work within 750 feet of a residential area on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, and during the nighttime period, except as provided in Section 10.48.030. · Grading, construction, or demolition occurring during nighttime periods shall not be allowed unless they meet the nighttime standards of Section 10.48.040. Existing Noise Environment 8 y-~-11t The predominate noise source affecting the site is vehicular traffic along Interstate 280, which is audible throughout the site. Noise generated by traffic on the 1-280 off ramp to Wolfe Road and Wolfe Road also affects the site. A noise monitoring survey was conducted from :;:ìeptember 7-8, 2005 (Wednesday-Thursday) to quantify the existing noise environment at representative residential receiver locations. One long-tenn (24-hour) and two short-tenn (lO-minute) noise measurements were conducted. Noise measurement locations are shown on Figure 1. Measurement results are summarized in Table 3. Table 3 Vallco Proposed Residential Project - Noise Measurement Summary Noise Level (dBA Noise Measurement Location Range of Range of (Date/Time) Davtime Len" Nighttime Leo" DNL LT-1 --200 feet from near lane ofI- 68-70 57-68 71 dBA 280. (Sep. 7-8, 2005) Measured Noise at Valleo September 7-8, 2005 90 , - ,- _85" - - - <' 80 , ,cC" c." '" 75 :=, 70 ;,;:_~_,:...~~C___"::,,~:,:._"; .::':='::-c:_:c::-~-'-':=:::: =:;'~.,.-.::.~:......_--,--<c~~~;, ..-,-"':",_:~:;£'~;,~_ It Leq o¡ .. .........-. .__A~ ;.r-'P.: ,. 65 , . -.--.,;.....-..,.,............... ~ '~~--.... .'..../ , . L(1) ,..., 60 --.-.- ' " '"ocX:;~.."¡¡,¡'C..;,"Z'~ .,'., - ~ 55 .. .., .-.. ..._-... -&- L(50) 'õ , .. -. """,'- - - .- -.-,.- --'~R: - --~-- Z 50 - ,- -, -, .., ".-" -----. - " ;' ,~ " "-.... -..-x ~ , " ___ L(90) 45 ,..:, ~ 40 .-.. ,- .-,-,,----- #~~~~~~#~~#~~~#~~~#~#~~~# '" '" '" .... " '" 'V '" '" '" '" .... .... .... '" Hour Beginning , Len Lmax LSD L9D Estimated DNL ST-l -East portion of project site, about 80 feet from 1-280 Off Ramp 64 66 63 61 65 (SeD. 7,2005/ 13:30 to 13:40) ST -2 -South portion of project site, about 100 feet from 1-280 Off 60 63 60 59 63 Ramp (Sep. 7, 2005 / 13:30 to 13:4Ò) , 9 Lf-11~ " f',~:,it:"m'=':-" _.:ý\. ?:;.'~;'~.:~~';':: ··~·:~'·:'-"2'::?·".:f7; ,<~tc-: ;....'" ... -;":-:"""-~/ '"." .." , 'M'P / ,'. . ...-:~::-:~::~.~~:~~~<~ ,; ..~.);..-~~~~~~!";~f~1-f5-->13~:1 . " .'". _.~ ".-/ _ 1'-....-~_. ,./-.J(;~;/ ?~~~».., :'" ~¡/","¡/.. '" / r ~,._.J"':-----.. "\ <7'j7'-... st 2/ ',r· '",' \ \ --::~::,/~.(:; '/):.'~~ / .I - \ ;\ Figure 1 Noise Measurement Locations, Proposed Vallco Residences , Long-term noise measurement L T -I was located near the southeast corner of the site, almost 200 " feet from the near through lanes of 1-280 and about 50 feet from the off ramp. There was some shielding ofl-280 traffic at this measurement site. 1-280 is at a similar elevation to the site and consists of four traffic lanes in each direction, with a northbound auxiliary lane. A 4 to 5 foot concrete barrier is located along the divider between northbound and southbound 1-280 traffic lanes. Hourly Leq noise levels ranged from about 57 dBA at night/early morning to 70 dBA L,q during daytime hours. The calculated day-night average noise level was 71 dBA Ldn (See Figure 2). Simultaneous measurements made at 5 feet and 18 feet above the ground at L T -I indicated 5 dBA higher sound levels at the elevated position that would be similar to 2nd story noise exposure. A short-term measurement, ST-l, was made further from 1-280, but near the 1-280 southbound off ramp to quantify the ground level exposure at this location. The measurement was located at a height of 5 feet above the surrounding ground and noise levels were 64 dBA, about 5 dBA lower than those measured over the same time interval at L T -I. The calculated day-night average noise level at ST-l was 65 dBA Ldn. Another short-term noise measurement was made near ground-level at the south end of the project, close to the 1-280 off ramp (about 100 feet) and in proximity to Wolfe Road (about 250 feet). The measured noise level was 60 dBA and the estimated Ldn noise level is 63 dBA. Simultaneous measurements made at different heights at Site ST-2 indicated much higher noise levels aloft. Noise levels measured 17 feet above the ground (representative of 2nd floor exposure) were 6 dBA higher than levels measured at 5 feet above the ground (representative of ground level exposure). 10 y,113 NOISE IMP ACTS Noise and Land Use Compatibility Assessment Noise levels or exposure described in this section are discussed in tenns of Ldn noise level. Exterior Future Noise Environment The future noise environment throughout the maJonty of the site would continue to result primarily from traffic noise generated along 1-280, the southbound off ramp from 1-280 to Wolfe Road, and Wolfe Road. Noise from the Valko shopping center and associated parking structure would also contribute to some insignificant noise levels near the south portion of the site. Based on the site and building plans', multifamily residences proposed on the site would include private outdoor deck/patio areas. Future build-out traffic volumes along 1-280 were not available; however, future volumes for the off ramp and Wolfe Road were provided by Fehr & Peers2 A credible "worst-case" assessment of future noise levels would assume that traffic noise would increase by about I dBA at portions of the site within 250 feet of the near lane ofI-280. Traffic noise modeling was conducted using the latest version of the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) traffic noise model- TNM version 2.5. Existing traffic counts provided by_Çaltrall.§_~!()n~itIUraffic ]JrsJjeEti()ll.§p,().vi,<ledJ)Yl'~hr__8<]eers ~ert) ust)~ as inpuJ to the --- - --- ~------- - --,-.-.-.-------- model. Predicted noise levels were adjusted based on field measurements. Noise levels were predicted for ground level and upper level positions. Predicted future noise levels for the project are illustrated in Figure 2. Ground level noise exposure in the courtyard area of the project is predicted to be 65 dBA in the northern portion of the site between Buildings E and C. The outdoor courtyard area between Buildings A, B, C, and D would be about 60 dBA or less. This is considered a "nonnally acceptable" noise environment. The outdoor area at the north portion of the project site, near 1- 280, is predicted to have noise levels of about 72 dBA. If this area is intended for outdoor use activities, the noise environment would be considered "nonnally unacceptable." Ground level areas outside the east side of Building C would range from 66 to 74 dBA, depending on the exposure to 1-280. The ground level areas along the east side of Building B would range from 62 to 65 dBA. ' The building designs include private decks. Building facades and decks facing 1-280 (Building C and north portion of Building E) would be exposed to noise levels of up to 78 dBA. Noise levels at these deck areas could not feasibly be reduced to meet "nonnally acceptable" levels without fully enclosing the deck areas. Decks further away from 1-280, but still facing the 1-280 offramp to Wolfe Road (Buildings B and C) would be exposed to noise levels above 65 dBA Ldn. Noise levels at units facing the interior courtyard would be about 65 dBA Ldn or less. Units of Building D and the southern portion of Building E facing the existing single-family residences and shopping center are predicted to have exterior noise levels of 65 dBA Ldn or less. The 2nd floor units of the northem portion of Building E would have noise levels above 65 dBA. The City's noise policy regarding outdoor noise exposure at decks or patios is not clear.. It is I Condominiums a' Valleo Cupertino, California - Plan Diagram, Perkowitz+Ruth Architects, dated 11-23-05. 2 Email transmittal of pm peak-hour traffic volumes from K. Choy, 9-19-2005 11 4---I'H common for communities to not apply the outdoor noise exposure criteria at these spaces in urban settings or near large transportation sources, since the benefits associated with decks outweigh meeting the noise criteria. Mitigating noise exposure on decks is difficult. Interior Future Noise Environment Interior noise levels in new multi-family residential development must be maintained at or below 45 dBA Ldn per the noise standard established by the State Building Code. Interior noise levels within residential units with the windows partially open would be approximately 15 dB lower than exterior noise levels assuming typical California construction methods. Interior noise levels are about 20-25 dB lower than exterior noise levels with the windows closed. Where exterior day-night average noise levels are less than 70 dBA Ldn, interior noise levels can typically be maintained below State standards with the incorporation of an adequate forced air mechanical ventilation system in the residential unit to allow residents the option of controlling noise by maintaining the windows closed. Most of the proposed residential units would have noise levels that exceed 60 dBA Ldn; and therefore, would be subject to noise control per requirements of the State building code. Proposed residential units facing 1-280 and the 1-280 off ramp to Wolfe Road would have exterior noise levels that exceed 70 dBA Ldn and would likely require special acoustical treatments in thebuilding_designs..These .include_tbe f91]Qwillg: Building E South facing units of 2nd, 3rd, and4'h floors Most south facing units of ground floors All south facing 2nd, 3td, and 4th floors Most northern ground floor unit Two northern 2nd floor units Building B Building C Project-Generated Noise The project would primarily generate noise in two ways: project traffic and mechanical equipment associated with air handling systems on the buildings and parking facilities. Traffic would access the project from Wolfe Road near the shopping Center and is not anticipated to cause any noise impacts. A fire access lane would be maintained on site adjacent to the existing single-family residences; however, traffic is not anticipated to routinely use this lane. In addition, it is separated from the existing residences by a block wall. Mechanical equipment used as part of the air handling systems would be necessary for the project. The project has not reached the level of design where noise from this equipment could be predicted. However, it would have to meet the requirements of the City's noise ordinance. This would limit noise level to 60 dBA during the daytime or 50 dBA during the night. Equipment that produces noise levels that are in compliance with the noise ordinance would have a less than significant impact to surrounding land uses. Mitigation measures are recommended to ensure that equipment noise is maintained within the requirements of the City's' noise ordinance. 12 Y- r 115 ÇQÇQ --0-0 "'NO "'Ot- :> , , "0'"" I I.Q \.On f;;¡-n ~ ""-0 0 = = 0 .- ;::S........ :s O~ 'I .- 1-0 c =" N j ~ I 11 -( .~:\ í ,'/ ," , "' V' ! ;C'ì :! ,<;]1' ~(~i f~'- I~ , tl - -, -- ) _on ~ N t- II ",,'"d' ~g S "0-'0 ~, ÇQ -0 00 -= t- t:ÇQÇQn 0""1::;:1 '"å 1-0 Z,""t-O t-t-o o n ~:: OJJ"'!:j o~ = C 0 ;a~Eï:~ == 2] "2 = '''' N '"" ÇQ 'Y I I - . ~: ÇQ -0 on t- ÇQ' ~-o¡:::! ~""""1.I'111 ~r-r- 1-0 r.:I IN 0 1~r-..9 U n ~~~ Cl)-c::I o~ = C 0 :a=¡:¡::~ == 2] "E = ,'" N '"" ~"¡" I I , /. /,.;: 'I' ,'Ij' 'i, 'J! ill I, I'¡ I',. ;¡; " . "~'"-', ¡ ~t i7i ~ . --"1 '" -¡¡ ~ ,..¡ " '" ·Õ Z . '" ,..¡ " ... = - = f;o. -0 " - OJ :a " ... »-< '" '" ... = "" ~ tfr 11 & Construction Noise The proj ect could result in a substantial temporary increase in noise levels in the area during construction. During construction, noise levels would increase in the area of the site. The only area where construction noise levels could potentially impact existing noise sensitive receptors would be to existing single-family residences west of the site. Construction would take place as close as 30 feet from these homes. However, the existing block wall that borders the site would reduce noise levels. Noise levels could reach 75 to 80 dBA at the property line. The City of Cupertino's Noise Ordinance will require that noise levels along any nearby property not exceed 80 dBA during construction. This is a potentially significant impact. MITIGATION MEASURES Exterior Noise Levels Noise levels at the outdoor use area on the north side of the project site (near 1-280) and ground levels of buildings E, C, and B that face eitherI-280 or the 1-280 offramp to Wolfe Road could be reduced by constructing a sound wall along the property boundary adjacent to the off ramp. Such a sound wall, of 8 to 10 feet in height, would reduce noise levels by 6 to 8 dBA at ground- level positions (i.e., 5 feet above ground). The sound wall would have little or no effect for sound exposures at_2.nd levels or higher.-The-outdoor-noise,exposure,at.groundJevels would be brought to 65 dBA Ldn or less. Preliminary estimates indicate that the sound wall would have to be 10 feet high along the north portion of the site and then could be 8 feet high along the east side of the Building C facing the off ramp from 1-280. The wall could then be reduced to 6 feet along the southern portion of Building C and Building B. The sound wall would have to connect to the existing sound wall at the west side of the site. The [mal location and height of the sound wall should be determined when detailed site and grading plans are available. Outdoor decks/patios of Buildings B, C, and E would be exposed to noise levels of 65 dBA or higher. If the City applies the "normally acceptable" criteria for outdoor uses, than the only way to achieve 65 dBA Ldn would be through the use of solid materials and/or deck enclosures. This may be undesirable for the intended use. Interior Noise Levels Since just about all of the site would exceed 60 dBA Ldn, forced air mechanical ventilation would be required for all of the residences. This would be necessary to meet the State building code requirements. The proposed residential facades facing Interstate 280 and the southbound 1- 280 off ramp to Wolfe Road would require additional noise control treatments. Attaining the necessary noise reduction (approximately 30 dBA) from the exterior to interior spaces would be achievable with proper wall construction techniques, the selection of windows and doors with appropriate STC ratings, and the incorporation of forced-air mechanical ventilation systems. Specific noise control treatments cannot be determined until final building plans, project site plans and grading plans are developed for residential areas proposed on the site. The project would be required to submit a report to the City's Building Department, with the building plans that delineate the noise control treatments incorporated in the project design necessary to achieve the interior noise limit of 45 dBA Ldn. Lf-ITI Project Mechanical Equipment Detailed project plans should be reviewed by a qualified acoustical professional to detennine if mechanical equipment would operate in accordance with the City's noise ordinance. If necessary, features to reduce noise from this equipment (e.g., parapet walls) should be incorporated into the final project design. Construction Noise Construction equipment should be well maintained and used judiciously to be as quiet as practical. The following measures are identified to reduce noise from construction. 1. Limit demolition and construction activities to weekday non-holiday, daytime hours between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm; 2. Utilize 'quiet' models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists; 3. Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with mufflers, which are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment; ---------.-..----- .._--- - -- ------. .._-,-- 4. Locate all stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generators, as far away as possible rrom residences; 5. Prohibit all unnecessary idling of intemal combustion engines; 6. Construction noise levels should be mitigated by constructing noise barriers to shield any newly occupied multi-family units constructed as part ofthis project rrom construction at the adjacent buildings. 7. Notify all adjacent residences of the construction schedule in writing; 8. Designate a disturbance coordinator, responsible for responding to complaints about construction noise. The name and telephone number of the disturbance coordinator shall be posted at the construction site and made available to the residences adjacent to the construction site; 15 Lf ~11 ~ Draft Report Vallco Northwest Residential Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of Cupertino Prepared by: Fehr & Peers November, 2005 SJ05-805 4-1 rö TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ i 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................1 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 5 Roadway Network...............,.............,..............,............."",.......,...,·,··,·····,············,,················,······ ..........,.,........ 5 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ,..............................................'..................'........................................ 5 Existing Transit Service .. ..... .,.... ... ...'... ...... ............ ........ ...,. ... .... ,..... ..... ... ........ ... ......'........... ....,..,. ...... ...... .... ..', ,. 6 Existing Intersection Volumes and lane Configurations .............,.....,........,............,..............,.............,.............. 6 level of Service Methodology ,..........................,....................................................................,..................,.......11 Existing Intersection levels of Service...........................................,............................·..·......·..·........................12 Field Observations........,...........,............",.,...........,..,.............···············,··,.·····..····..·..··,·········,··,···· .............,..... 13 3. BACKGROUND CONDITIONS...............................................................·..·...........··..·......................................15 Background Roadway Improvements ....,..........................................................................................................15 Background Traffic Estimates,..... ....,...... ..... ......... .... .... ..... ....... ....... .... ...... ..... ..............',..... ............. ... ...... ........ 15 Background Intersection levels of Service ....................................................................................................... 15 4. PROJECT CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................................18 Project Traffic Estimates..................,..........................................···········..··..··,····..··..···..·····..·..·,·,··..····..·········· .. 18 , ,Project Intersection levels of Service .................................................,..............................................---,...........19 School Traffic................................................................,.................·.···.·············,·...··..·..·..······..··..········· ............ 24 Intersection Impact Criteria......................."..,.........,.................................,.··········..·.····.·········..···············,,·..·.... 24 Intersection Mitigation Measu res...................,.............................,....................··..··..····..····..··..····..··..·············.. 25 Site Access and On-Site Circulation.....................,..............,.............................................................................25 Parking...........................................................................................,................................,............ ...................... 25 5. CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................... 27 Cumulative Traffic Estimates .... .............. ..... ................................. ......'.....,......... ................................'...... ........ 27 Cumulative Intersection levels of Service ........................................................................................................27 APPENDICES Appendix A: Intersection Turning Movement Counts Appendix B: Level of Service Calculations Appendix C: Approved Developments Appendix D: Peak Hour Volume Warrant Lf-I ?/ Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 LIST OF FIGURES Site Location...........,.,...............,.,..........................,.......,........................,...,........,......,...,..... ................ 3 Proposed Site Pian ....... ........................ ......... ...,.."...... ....., ........... ...... ..... ................. ................. ..,.......4 Existing Bicycle Facilities ............. ........ ............. ...... .......... ............ ................ ,............... ......,.... ..........,.8 Existing Transit Facilities. .......... ...... ..... ,............ .......... ........................... .............,..,..........,...... .........'.. 9 Existing Peak Hour Volume..................,............................................................................................. 1 0 Background Peak Hour Volumes ........,..............................................................................................17 Project Trip Distribution ............. ........ ................... '........... ........,.... ....... '.......... ........ ............ ......'... ..... 20 Residential Project Trip Assignment ...............'.............................................................,.................... 21 Project Peak Hour Volumes ...... .......,....,................. ....... ......................... ........ .......... .......... .......... ..... 22 Recommended Site Plan Changes ..,..........................................'...................................................... 26 Cumulative No Project Peak Hour Volumes ......................................................................................28 Cumulative Pius Project Peak Hour Volumes ,........,..,.......,................-....c................c..................'..........-.........29- q, /gL Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 LIST OF TABLES Signalized Intersection level of Service Definitions Using Average Control Vehicular Delay.......... 11 Unsignalized Intersection level of Service Definitions Using Average Control Delay...................... 12 Existing Intersection Levels of Service............................,......................·..........................·............... 13 Background Intersection Levels of Service .................,......................................,..............................16 Project Trip Generation Rates and Estimates.......,.............,..............,.............................................·18 Background and Project Intersection Levels of Service..........,......................................................... 23 Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service ....................................................,................................... 31 Lf~ 193 , ~ f _ Draft Val/co Norlhwest Residential November 2005 ' ....... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed Vallco Northwest residential project. The proposed project includes construction of 156 condominiums on an existing Vallco shopping center parking lot. The project site is generally bounded by Interstate 280 to the north, additional Vallco parking and retail uses to the south, Wolfe Road to the east, and existing single-family residences to the west. The impacts of the proposed project to the surrounding transportation system were evaluated following the guidelines of the City of Cupertino and the Valley Transportation Authority. The operations of 10 key intersections were evaluated with level of service calculations during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak periods for Existing, Background, Project, Cumulative No Project and Cumulative plus Project Conditions. PROJECT TRIP ESTIMATES The proposed residential project is estimated to generate 937 new daily trips, 74 new AM peak-hour trips (13 inbound/61 outbound) and 87 new PM peak-hour trips (58 inbound/29 outbound). INTERSECTION OPERATIONS AND IMPACTS Table ES-1 presents the level of service results for all study intersections under Existing, Background, Project, -and-Cumulative Conditions. The intersection ofValÍeD Parkway and Wolfe Road-wouia operate aCLÖS-E' during the PM peak hour under Cumulative plus Project Conditions. The project's contribution is not cumulatively considerable, therefore, the project would not have a cumulative impact at this intersection. The unsignalized intersection of Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road would worsen to LOS E during the PM peak hour under Cumulative plus Project Conditions. However, field observations indicate the actual delay is less than the calculated delay and this operation is not considered a significant impact. The remaining intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours under all scenarios. The proposed project would have a less-than-significant project impact to the study intersections. SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION Access to the project site is provided via one driveway on Perimeter Road, Stop signs should be provided at the driveway intersection with Perimeter Road. No other modifications to on-site circulation are recommended. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT IMPACTS We recommend that a pedestrian and bicycle connection be provided to the residential neighborhood to the west. This connection will facilitate walking and biking trips to the schools located in this neighborhood and allow nearby residents to walk to the shops at Vallco. In addition, a pedestrian connection should be provided to Wolfe Road to provide access to the sidewalks and bus stops on Wolfe Road. The project would not have a significant impact to the transit facilities because existing transit service is provided within one-quarter mile of the project site. PARKING According to the city's code requirements, 312 spaces are required. The current site plan indicates 314 (307 covered spaces and 7 uncovered guest spaces) spaces provided. Therefore, the number of proposed parking spaces exceeds the city requirements by two spaces. The project should also provide 62 Class I Bicycle spaces. The proposed project will also remove approximately 550 parking spaces for the Vallco shopping center. These fp FEHR & PURS 1~.~..~.a".. u..,~".."s tff I ~tj/ · , Draft Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 - spaces should be replaced with the redevelopment of the shopping center. We recommend that "No Vallco Parking" signs with a warning of towed vehicles be installed. , , " Existing Background Project Cumulative + Project Peak din âinCrit. Crit Intersections Hour Delay' LOS2 Delai LOSz Delay1 LOSz V/C3 Delal Delay' LOSz 1, Homestead Road! AM 26,5 C 26.9 C 26,8 C +0.003 0.0 27.2 C Wolfe Road PM 43.0 D 46,5 D 46,6 D +0.003 +0.2 48.1 D 2. Pruneridge Avenue AM 21.3 C+ 20,3 C+ 20,2 C+ +0.004 0,0 21,2 C+ NJolfe Road PM 32,5 C- 31.7 C 31.7 C +0,003 0,0 32,5 C- 3. Wolfe Road I AM 12,4 B 12,8 B 12.8 B +0,004 +0.1 13.0 B 1-280 NB Ramps6 PM 10.8 B+ 13,6 B 13,9 B +0.010 +0.5 15.7 B 4, Wolfe Roadll-280 AM 11.3 B+ 11.2 B+ 11.2 B+ +0.007 0.0 11.2 B+ S8 Ramps6 PM 10,3 B+ 11.0 B+ 11,1 B+ +0.007 +0.1 11.7 B+ 5. S8 Wolfe Road I AM 9.8 A 10.3 B 10,4 B nIa nIa 10.6 B Perimeter Road PM 11,0 B 13,9 B 14.0 B nIa n/a 14.8 B rN'i'_ - 6, NB Wolfe Road I AM 10,8 B 12.1 B 12,7 B n/a n/a 13,0 B Perimeter Road PM 11,9 B 28.5 D 31,4 D nIa n/a 38,6 E (E)' 7. Vallco Parkway I AM 13.6 B 17.6 B 17.5 B 0.000 0,0 19.3 B- Wolfe Road PM 28.1 C 54,4 D- 54.4 D- +0.001 +0.1 67.5 E 8, Vallee Parkway I AM 13.1 B 17.8 B 17,8 B 0,000 0.0 17.3 B Perimeter Road PM 17,6 B 19.5 B- 19.5 B- 0.000 0,0 19.4 B- 9. Stevens Creek AM 8,1 A 8.3 A 8,6 A +0.001 +0.1 8,5 A Boulevard I PM 15,7 B 16,2 B 16.4 B 0.000 0,0 15.9 B Perimeter Road 10. Stevens Creek AM 35,7 D+ 36.8 D+ 36,9 D+ +0.003 +0.1 37.3 D+ Boulevard I Wolfe PM 37.8 D+ 42.6 D 42.8 D +.0.003 +0.2 45.5 D Road6 ii fþ FEI'''' & PEERS '"....~~.,.,¡o. ".~'u"AØ'1 Lf ~ I ~5 Draft Vallco Northwest Residential November 2005 -- 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed Vallco Northwest residential project in Cupertino, California. The proposed project includes construction of 156 condominiums on an existing surface parking lot. The project site is generally bounded by Interstate 280 to the north, additional Vallco parking and retail uses to the south, Wolfe Road to the east, and existing single-family residences tb the west. The purpose of the analysis is to identify potential transportation impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding roadway system, and recommend appropriate improvements to mitigate these significant impacts. A map of the project site location is presented in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the proposed site plan with access to the site from Perimeter Road, Existing and future conditions were evaluated with level of service calculations for the key intersections near the project site. Project impacts were estimated following the guidelines of the City of Cupertino and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), which is the congestion management agency for Santa Clara County. The analysis evaluated the operations of the following key intersections: 1. Homestead Road and Wolfe Road 2. Pruneridge Avenue and Wolfe Road -- - - -.- - - - - - - 3. Wolfe Road and 1-280 Northbound Ramps 4. Wolfe Road and 1-280 Southbound Ramps 5. Perimeter Road Connector (W) and Southbound Wolfe Road (right in/right out) 6. Perimeter Road Connector (E) and Northbound Wolfe Road (right in/right out) 7. Vallco Parkway and Wolfe Road 8. Vallco Parkway and Perimeter Road 9. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Perimeter Road 10. Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road/Miller Avenue The operations of the study intersections were evaluated during the weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak periods. Each intersection was evaluated for the following four scenarios: Existing Conditions - Existing volumes obtained from counts, representing peak one-hour conditions during the morning and evening commute peak traffic periods. Scenario 2: Background Conditions - Existing volumes plus traffic from approved but not yet constructed and occupied developments near the project site. Scenario 1: Scenario 3: Project Conditions - Background plus project trips from the proposed residential development. Scenario 4: Cumulative No Project Conditions - Traffic from pending developments in the area will be added to the volumes from Scenario 2. Scenario 5: Cumulative plus Project Conditions - Project-generated traffic added to Scenario 4 !,raffic volumes. 1 fì> FEHR & PErRS ,.....~...r.'IQ~· C~Ií~U\ 'A"U 4~ \ 9 (p Draft Val/Go Northwest Residential -~~ , " ' !! The remainder of this report is divided into four chapters. The existing transportation system seNing the site and the current operating conditions of the key intersections are described in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 evaluates traffic operations under Background Conditions for approved but not yet constructed local developments. Chapter 4 describes the method used to estimate the amount of traffic added to the surrounding roadways by the proposed project and its impacts on the transportation system under Project Conditions. This chapter also includes a discussion of site access, on-site circulation, and parking. Cumulative Conditions is described in Chapter 5, 2 fp FEClR& PEERS ......~'..f."O~ UIt'U"'.'; L//~ I ~J7 LEGEND 0 . Study Intersection ~ Project Location @ N NOT TO SCALE SITE LOCATION FIGURE ~I " WJ <1J U c <1J ~ ~ ~ oj ¿ " ~ 10' ~ I-- Creek Homestead Rd. Stevens -ci '" ,ß! õ '" oj > « Æ ~ Resident,,,I\ Graphics \ Od05 \Fig1_sile_locQ hD",dwg '0 '" ~ <1J ~ lj I oj ¿ '" <1J c ~ ¡¡; FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Oct 25. 2005 PC N,\Projects\SJ05-805 Volk:oNorth",,, L , "9 -<) , ~81C1JReD'~ _ 111 ~!ItC~I_! __ r--:rt.,~^,..,~'"':;;'- .' J01~ --- - '-', --- ", ...--- . . _ _~._.__ . ' " ;;;.' c.- ,,. --' -- .,' -. ' CD ' - - .' -- . . - ." . . - ' -.' . --' =. -'ìl \: Ii-,-","-"",'^-""-'"I IJ,.jJ~,'I,L~~u~,'iT· , '/ncrJJJ ~J¡mJ ï : ì'\,.~',i~Z~ I' tm:¡;:,'-¡- ,.µ,.J "-' ,_.. §õsCAi'Eol "'-"'-'''--' LI -/ · ,. ".. ,.... I __I \" / ". ;\ ," 'I' ,''''''''4 - --.. ' ;,._. ,u \ ¡íiìf!)~f¡.,'~1 ¡ !=~..:~" ~r:I' __~"'n1~1---'-;T:-C~ ,,/' ~I \ c, . ,'" .,. I. ,'" ',,",' ",,,,,, ". -=- ,-' .- . ' ".' '" -~:..,,~ ~;:::,:-:: --.~" ~-;;;..\ ~ .., " ," 1 ",", ,', ~'^'. -- "<- .~--~". :-'~. ~~' 2::/, " I ), t -- " , ,," ",. " r-' c;~ ~' " " - ': !'....,J 2A\~' '[ ", "/ .'-< . ,,,,', ~~. c - : "I I' ,.",',rl,1 '~~, y_=--~~ÕÄ.\;A;",~'~B'·" ,', ':-", ___J--_......., I I '41"'" -- I """"' '\.,'f.- '" "' ,~-- I ,> . ,~, " ' ' ' ¡ ",^",- . ,'. "'l~f .rit" /", " '",.' ~_..,,, ï. ,'u" _. "I ( .... "I )J)íN,' , "r - .' - ,"'¡;¡;¡¡_~' "7'-':- ... -- j _, y r \ ¡,/ /' '. __ __. ,,,_ ~. ',\W"~' . )< . _ ____ CQllDOB.4a. /', ,py _., '. ,,' "-, ,,--<t~~ -" . - )' c; :7" ./0'-'> ~'- " 'n~__'_ .__:')~T-,. i'/r' ,,-', If ,--./,.,., , ,,' YI''/ ,I ^. ,\ ' , ,.I '~"~ I '. ^- // ¡RECREA I.....' ,I'""'" (I!. '.!II ,"1,"- ,_,'. ~ " ,I h'lf 'IÕ leo»~~ \'~ ;,,",y-~ ,r ./ '/ 'tU/ """," I (",,! .;. _'I ~ ,,=fWoIO ,/ il I "'""""'"'" ~ ,,..,;:' Ii 'I! .... ,:"",; ", I: __~___._SURF~ .- \') ,: ' ,:,;~~i, ' , ~, .C ,. ,) BUILDINGÍ\: 35TORY BUILDING B: 3 STORY BUILDING C: 3 STORY BUILDING E: 2 STORY BL!JL.DING F: 2 STORY _ TOTAL 1 BEDROOMD.U.:29 .: TOTAL 2 BEDROOM D.U.: 99 TOTAl TOWNHOUSE D.U. (3 BEDROOM): 28 TOTAL D.U_ ON THREE FLOORS: 156 LAND AAEA: 6.19ACRE RATIO: 30 DU PER ACRE PARKING STALLS ON GRADE: -+1-7 COVERED PARKING STALLS: +/·301 TOTAL PARKING OVERALl :.../- 314 PROPOSED SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 ~ , f if FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Nov 29. 2005 PC N:\Projects\Nol"I SF projects\SJ05-.,-B05\Fi92_sitsplol"l.dw9 H bJ L \ ~ -D Draft Vallco Northwest Residentiat November 2005 --. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS This chapter describes the existing conditions of the roadway faciiities, pedestrian and bicycie facilities, transit service, traffic volumes, and intersection operations. This chapter also includes a discussion of the methodology used to calculate intersection levels of service and the corresponding results. ROADWAY NETWORK The project site location and the surrounding roadway network are presented on Figure 1. Regional access is provided by Interstate-280 (1-280), Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Local access is provided by Perimeter Road and Vallco Parkway. Descriptions of these roadways are provided below. 1-280 is a north-south, eight-lane freeway with one lane in each direction designated as a high occupancy vehicie (HaV) lane. HaV lanes, also known as diamond lanes or carpool lanes, are restricted for use by vehicles occupied by two or more persons or motorcycles between 5:00 am and 9:00 am and between 3:00 pm and 7:00 pm. HaVs inciude carpools, vanpools, and buses. It extends from San Francisco, in the north, to San Jose, in the south. Near the site, 1-280 runs in a northwest to southeast direction and is located south of the site. Regional access from 1-280 to the project site is provided via its interchange with Wolfe Road, Ramp metering is utilized on both northbound and southbound on-ramps during peak periods. Sl'eWins Creek Boulevard is -ä six-Iarie~eá-shve$t divided arterial located south' of the project site: It extends from the western boundary of Cupertino into San Jose to the east. Stevens Creek Boulevard is primarily fronted by commercial land uses, inciuding retail, restaurant, and office uses near the site. Wolfe Road is a four-to-six-Iane, north-south arterial located west of the project site. South of Stevens Creek Boulevard, this street is known as Miller Avenue. Perimeter Road is a two-lane internal roadway on the Vallco property. Perimeter Road extends north from Stevens Creek Boulevard along the western boundary of the Vallco property then turns east and tunnels under Wolfe Road and then turns south to connect with Vallco Parkway. Vallco Parkway is a six-lane, east-west roadway that connects Wolfe Road to Tantau Avenue. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES Pedestrian facilities comprise sidewalks and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. Sidewalks are generally provided on both sides on Wolfe Road near the project site. All of the signalized intersections in the area are equipped with pedestrian signals. Bicycie facilities comprise bike paths, bike lanes, and bike routes. Bike paths are paved pathways for use by bicycies that are separated from roadways. Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycies with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bike routes are designated with signs only. Bike lanes are provided on Wolfe Road, Tantau Avenue, Vallco Parkway, and Pruneridge Avenue near the site. Miller Avenue and Pruneridge east of Tantau Avenue are designated as bike routes. Existing bicycie facilities are shown on Figure 3. 5 fp FEHR & PEE ItS "'~""'''<TO. t~I"~"U" Lt- \'1 0 · ' Draft Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 -- EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) operates bus service in Santa Clara County. Figure 4 shows the existing transit facilities near the project site including the location of the closest bus stops on Wolfe Road south of Perimeter Road. Each route is described below. Route 23 is a local bus route that provides service between Downtown San Jose and the San Antonio Shopping Center via Stevens Creek Boulevard near the site. The hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 12:30 am with 15- to 50-minute headways on weekdays. On weekends, this route operates on 15- to 50-minute headways between 5:00 am and 12:00 am. Route 26 is a local bus route that provides service between East San Jose and Sunnyvale. Weekday hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 11 :00 pm with 20- to 50-minute headways, Weekend operations are provided on 30- to 50-minute headways between 7:00 am and 9:30 pm. This route operates an Wolfe Road west of the site. Route 35 is a local bus route that provides commute service between East San Jose and Vallco Fashion Park. Weekday hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 9:00 am and from 3:00 pm to 7:00 pm with 50-minute headways. This route does not provide service to the study area on weekends. This route operates on Wolfe Road, Vall co Parkway. and Pruneridge Avenue near the site. Route 51 is a local bus route between Vallco Fashion Park and Mountain View. The hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 7:00 pm with 30, to 50-minute beadways. Saturday operations are provided o,n 50-minute h,€!adways, between 9:00 am and 7:00 pm. This route operates on Wolfe Road, Vallco Parkway, and Homestead Road near the site. Route 81 is a local bus route between East San Jose and Vallco Fashion Park. The hours of operation are 5:00 am to 11:00 pm on weekdays with 30- to 50-minute headways. This route operates on 50-minute headways between 8:00 am and 9:00 pm on Saturdays and Sundays. Route 81 operates on Woife Road, Pruneridge Avenue, and Tantau Avenue near the project site. Route 101 is an express bus route between the Park-n-Ride lot at Camden Avenue I State Route 85 and Palo Alto. This route operates northbound between 5:45 am to 8:30 am and southbound between 3:30 pm and 7:00 pm with 30-minute headways. This route does not operate on weekends. Route 101 operates on Wolfe Road and 1-280 near the project site. Route 182 is an express bus route between Palo Alto and the IBM facility on Bailey Avenue. This route operates two southbound buses between 7:00 am to 8:30 am and two northbound buses between 4:45 pm and 5:30 pm with 30- to 45-minute headways. This route does not operate on weekends. Route 182 operates on Vallco Parkway, Wolfe Road, and 1-280 near the project site. EXISTING INTERSECTION VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS The operations of the key intersections were evaluated during weekday morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak- hour conditions. Per City guidelines, the AM and PM peak periods occur from 7:00 am to 9:00 am and 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm, respectively. Intersection operations were evaluated for the highest one-hour volume counted during each period. New traffic counts were conducted at all of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak periods in August and September 2005 (see Appendix A), At the time of the counts, the driveway opposite Perimeter Road on Stevens Creek Boulevard was closed due to the construction ;;It the Marketplace development. Therefore, Year 2000 counts at the Stevens Creek Boulevard and Perimeter Road were used for the analysis. Figure 5 presents 6 fp FEClR & PEERS "_'~"~~'.HQ" L""~U"U'~ q~IC;¡1 Draft Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 - the existing AM and PM peak-hour turning movement volumes at the ten study intersections. Existing intersection lane configurations and traffic control devices are also presented on Figure 5. 7 fp FEHR & PEŒS "......ul~n~" ',D~.uU~J;n Lf~lq)- LEGEND . Bike Lane - - - Bike Route _11- . Bike Permitted ~ Project Location ------ - I ,;., ~ - 0._ x §I ~ ~ - ro ' ~- ----~--- - I ~_ - Homestead Rd. . - - Iii .1! Õ ;;: £ ~ ro ~ c ~ Ave. '0 '" ~ '" ~ '" E ." '" a. I '" > « "." '" C ro ã5 ~ « "" u .S; ... @ ------ Creek Stevens N NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES FIGURE 3 - I - - - J .dwg Res;denl;QI\Groph¡~s\Od05\Fi9:Lbikerou ,- <1> ~- ,1¡- :¡¡I ~ .\ I PEE RS CONSULTANTS FEHR & TRANSPORTATION Oct 25. 2005 PC N,\Projects\SJOS-605 Volleo Northwe -+- \ ...D W LEGEND ~ Project Location @ local Bus Route @) Express Bus Route m Bus Stop 23""""" @ ~ N NOT TO SCALE - EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES FIGURE 4 81 26 51 Homestead Rd. -ci a: J'! <5 s: ~I x '" <1> u ~ <1> ~ '" ~ ~ « ~ '" 1;' '" f- .., 25 Rotsìde,,¡iol\Grophics\O<:t05\Fìg4-_l'onsi m 'Ó a: ~ <1> ~ <1> E '¡: <1> £l. 23 PEE RS CONSULTANTS VollcoNoMh...e <Ii .i( ,., <1> ~ '" ¡¡; FEHR & TRANSPORTATION Qd 25. 2005 PC N,\P'ojects\SJOS-a05 + \ ,J:') -+- LEGEND '" J - Turn Lane '" ~ " ~ - Project Location N ---¿;::- :;;;; §~5 N . XX (YY) . AM (PM) Peak Hour ~F-e!. ~::.. ~ ~-- _M~ ~~ Traffic Volumes . T raffie Signal --- -L 79 (75) .-0."1 L45(109: ~N p.= 695 (503: ~~~ . ~Nm N__ ~N . Study Intersection -H¡~ ---391(542) -¡Ill --26(60) JII r ~52 (311: ~ - Stop Sign I(' 179 (295) 1('118(40 i1\1r Ptunorldi¡....., i1\1r H'O' 99¡'66¡~ 43 !"! J IIf Homestead Rd. 3521 515 555 ::::::. íñ'ãJõ' a5(l2aT Cì~ " 207 257 -, ~M~ O~N :;;;íñ " £::!,!::.C c.Sc M~ . ~N~ NN~ &:. ~ mNN ~~~ ~~ _~N "!~ ~o ~.M olfe Rd 11-280 5B Ramps 5 Wolfe Rd ¡Perimeter Rd (W) II ... 8 tñ I ~~- N , cnM. ~.:: N~ N~ -- -~ L" (113) ~~ mN ~N ~~ · J 1111 Jill ~ , · " ¡B~ P..."....R<I.!W) P........Rd.IE) · " 633 (434) dJ IIr j II-- § ¡ 219 (355) =ïi Of" 5(21)ì 00:;;- , N~ . ~~ -- = ¿~ ; ~N r ~, ~~ < ~M . - " a\lco Pkwy /Wo!fe Rd 8 Vallco Pkwy ¡Penmeter Rei Creck Blvd ¡Perimeter Rd 10 Stevens Cleek Blvd /Wolfe R I 8 0 'éõ,ñ'N .........-.:;;; ~~O ~_O N~O N-~ --~ J.. 7 (19) _Nm C!::.S:!. -~- N_N J.." (39) NNM L31 (247) --- --- m~M -1-183(121 ~N~ ~om ::::= 41- (168) ~-M M~~ -3(12) -~- :::='·1,432 (1,092) MN_ ==== 703 (664' JIII~ 1(''' (97) + ,'6(3) .-if- ,'''(94) Jill 1(''' (193) ~ Vallo......., 3¡621~ ì jj I-- Vlli<oPkwy + ~ I s,......C<ookjjjo; + s'....,·;~7538) :=!J ì III-- - @ 1'1- 13(91)J 20 (120¡ ::b 223-, $&-=;:- 83 (6a) =:: ~_N 1,075(1,485 -- íD:;¡:'"@" 394(748~ --- iñiñM' MO~ 29 (") T --~ 9(21 T ~.:::::.t;. 84 (59 T ~N ~ -m- -0- ~M- ~-~ ~ M w_m --w N N~ - mN~ N NN _N ~ NOT TO SCALE - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FEHR & PEE RS AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS- TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS EXISTING CONDITIONS Od 25. 2005 ,C N:\P<ojec!s\SJ05-805 Volk:o Northwest Res¡denl¡o!\Grophics\<Xl05\Fi95_xl~.dw, FIGURE 5 +- \ -J.) \1\ Draft Vallco Norlhwest Residential November 2005 ...... LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service. Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on such factors as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, as the best operating conditions, to LOS F, or the worst operating conditions. LOS E represents "at-capacity" operations. When volumes exceed capacity, stop-and-go conditions result, and operations are designated as LOS F. Signalized Intersections The level of service methodology approved by the City of Cupertino and the VfA analyzes a signalized intersection's operation based on average control vehicular delay calculated using the method described in Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board) with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect conditions in Santa Clara County. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections is calculated using TRAFFIX analysis software and is correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS' USING AVERAGE CONTROL VEHICULAR DELAY Average Control Delay per Vehicle Level of Service Description (Seconds) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable :;; 10,0 progression and/or short cycle lengths. B+ Operations with low delay occurring with good progression andlor 10.1 to 12.0 B short cycle lengths. 12.1 to 18.0 B- 18.1 to 20.0 C+ Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression 20.1 to 23.0 C andlor longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to 23.1 to 32.0 C- appear. 32,1 to 35.0 D+ Operations with longer delays due to a combination of 35.1 to 39,0 D unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios, 39.1 to 51.0 D- Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 51.1 to 55,0 E+ Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, 55.1 to 60.0 E long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios, Individual cycle failures 60.1 to 75.0 E- are frequent occurrences. 75,1 to 80.0 F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring >80,0 due to over-saturation, poor progression, Of very long cycle lengths. Source: VTA's CMP Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines, June 2003, and Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2000. 11 fp FHlR & PEERS 1~'~.~'UI~11QM t'U5~':·U'S L-j-,--¡q& , ' Draft Vallco Northwest Residential November 2005 - --. The level of service standard (i.e., minimum acceptable operations) for all of the signalized study intersections in the City of Cupertino is LOS D except at two locations. According to the City's General Plan, the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard and the De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Road intersections must maintain LOS E+ operations (with no more than 60 seconds weighted average control delay). The same operations methodology is used by the Valley Transportation Authority 0IT A) to analyze traffic impacts for Congestion Management Program (CMP) facilities. The level of service standard for CMP-designated intersections is LOS E. However, in Cupertino, City LOS standards are used to identify intersection impacts. Uns;gnalized Intersections Operations of the unsignalized Perimeter Road intersections at Northbound and Southbound Wolfe Road were evaluated using the methodology contained in Chapter 17 of the 2000 HCM. Level of service ratings for stop-sign controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At two-way or side street-controlled intersections, the control delay is calculated for each movement, not for the intersection as a whole, For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. For all-way stop-controlled locations, a weighted average delay for the entire intersection is presented. Table 2 summarizes the relationship between delay and LOS for unsignalized intersections. LOS D is considered the minimum acceptable level of service for unsignalized intersections, T ABI£ 2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVtCE DEFINITIONS USING AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY Average Control Delay per Vehicle Level of Service Description (Seconds) A Little or no delay ,; 10.0 B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 15,0 C Average traffic delays 15.1 to 25.0 D Long traffic delays 25.1 to 35,0 E Very long traffic delays 35.1 to 50.0 F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded > 50.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Existing intersection lane configurations and peak-hour turning movement volumes were used to calculate the levels of service for the key intersections during each peak hour. The results of the LOS analysis for Existing Conditions are presented in Table 3. The corresponding calculation sheets are contained in Appendix B. The results of the LOS calculations indicate that all study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). 12 ~ FEHR & PEERS lu..s....a...-'!o..;:I>..$U\a~11 L{~lqÎ , ' Draft Vallco Northwest Residentia/ November 2005 --. TABLE 3 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Intersection Peak Hour Count Date Control Delay LOS 1. Homestead Road / Wolfe Road AM 08/05 Signal 26.5 C PM 08/05 43.0 D 2, Pruneridge Avenue / Wolfe Road AM 08/05 Signal 21,3 C+ PM 08/05 32,5 C- 3, Wolfe Road /1-280 NB Ramps' AM 08/05 Signal 12.4 B PM 08105 10.8 B+ 4. Wolfe Road /1-280 SB Ramps' AM 08/05 Signal 11.3 B+ PM 08/05 10,3 B+ 5. SB Wolfe Road / Perimeter Road (W)5 AM 08/05 Two-Way Stop 9,8 A --...- - PM 08/05 11,0 B 6, NB Wolfe Road / Perimeter Road (E)5 AM 08/05 Two-Way Stop 10.8 B PM 08/05 11,96 B 7. Vallco Parkway / Wolfe Road AM 08/05 Signal 13.6 B I PM 08/05 28.1 C 8, Vallco Parkway / Perimeter Road AM 08/05 Signal 13.1 B PM 08/05 17,6 B 9 Stevens Creek Boulevard I Perimeter Road AM 01/00 Signal 8.1 A PM 01/00 15.7 B 10. Stevens Creek Boulevard / Wolfe Road' AM 08/05 Signal 35,7 D+ PM 08/05 37,8 D+ Notes: 1 AM = morning peak-hour, PM = evening peak-hour. 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manua', with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX level of service analysis software package. 3 LOS = Level of service 4 Designated CMP intersection. S Control delay. expressed in seconds per vehicle. is presented for the worst movement/approach for the unsignalized intersection. Change 6 Observed delay is less than the calculated delay. FIELD OBSERVATIONS Field observations of the study intersections were conducted during the morning and evening peak hours in September 2005. The intersections were generally observed to operate at the calculated levels of service for each peak period. No significant congestion was noted on Woife Road and Vallco Parkway. Obs<¡rvations at the 13 fp FEHR & PEERS '~HSP\'H"I~M (~M~U'·'''M'S L!--,IC?8' ¡ , " ' Drat! Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 - Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road intersection indicated an average delay of 6 seconds per vehicle for Perimeter Road during the PM peak hour which is 50 percent less than the calculated delay. During field observations the following lanes were closed for construction: · The eastbound through lane adjacent to the median on Stevens Creek Boulevard was closed between Wolfe Road and Finch Avenue but, the left turn pocket remained accessible. · The westbound through lane adjacent to the median on Stevens Creek Boulevard was closed between Finch Avenue and Wolfe Road but, the left turn pocket remained accessible. · The northbound driveway for the shopping center at Perimeter Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard was closed for construction. The lane closures near Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard did not adversely influence intersection operations. The remaining two lanes in each direction on Stevens Creek Boulevard did not queue back through adjacent intersection to affect operations between Finch Avenue and Perimeter Road. During the closure of the northbound approach at the Perimeter Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard intersection, motor vehicles used the alternate shopping center access of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Portal Avenue, which is the next intersection to the west. 14 fp FEHIt& PEERS 'u....~....,!o. touu<,~"" L{--¡gg Draft Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 -- 3. BACKGROUND CONDITIONS This chapter discusses the operations of the key intersections under Background Conditions. Background Conditions are defined as conditions prior to compietion of the proposed development and serve as the basis to identify project impacts. Traffic voiumes for Background Conditions comprise existing voiumes plus traffic generated by approved but not yet constructed developments in the area. The results of the ievel of service analysis for Background Conditions are presented in this chapter. BACKGROUND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS As part of the Vallco Rose Bowl residentiai development, Vallco Parkway will be narrowed from six lanes to four lanes by eliminating one through lane in each direction. Since this is an approved project, Vallco Parkway was assumed to be narrowed under Background Conditions. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ESTIMATES Traffic volumes for Background Conditions were estimated by adding existing volumes and traffic generated by approved but not yet constructed and occupied developments in the study area. The list of approved projects, presented in Appendix C, was developed with input from planning staff from the Cities of Cupertino, Santa Clara and Sunnyvale. Traffic from the approve>d_developments was obtain'1d from tnaffiçimp_act[eporlsor,'1stil11ated using ITE trip generation rates and standard engineering practice. The trips associated with each development were then assigned to the roadway network based on the relative locations of complementary land uses and existing and estimated future travel patterns. These trips were added to existing traffic volumes to obtained background traffic volumes. Figure 6 illustrates the traffic volumes at the study intersections under Background Conditions. BACKGROUND INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection level of service calculations were conducted to evaluate the operating levels of the study intersections under Background Conditions. The results of the LOS analysis for the key intersections are presented in Table 4, The corresponding LOS calculation sheets are included in Appendix B. All of the study intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours. 15 fì> FEHR & PéERS '....~.~HA1!"" {~'W"U" q _ ;)-DO · t , . - Draft Valleo Northwest Residential November 2005 -- TABLE 4 BACKGROUND INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Peak Intersection Intersection Hour Control Delay LOS 1. Homestead Road 1 Wolfe Road AM Signal 26.9 C PM 46,5 D 2. Pruneridge Avenue I Wolfe Road AM Signal 20.3 C+ PM 31,7 C 3. Wolfe Road 11-280 NB Ramps' AM Signal 12.8 B PM 13,6 B 4. Wolfe Road 11-280 SB Ramps' AM Signal 11.2 B+ PM 11,0 B+ 5, SB Wolfe Road 1 Perimeter Road (W) 5 AM Two-Way Stop 10,3 B - ----- - PM 13.9 B 6. NB Wolfe Road 1 Perimeter Road (E) 5 AM Two-Way Stop 12.1 B PM 28.5' D 7. Valleo Parkway 1 Wolfe Road AM Signal 17,6 B PM 54.4 D- 8. Valleo Parkway 1 Perimeter Road AM Signal 17.8 B PM 19.5 B- 9 Stevens Creek Boulevard 1 Perimeter Road AM Si9nal 8.3 A PM 16.2 B 10, Stevens Creek Boulevard 1 Wolfe Road' AM Signal 36,8 D+ PM 42,6 D Notes: 1 AM = morning peak-hour. PM = evening peak-hour. 2 'M1ole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX level of service analysis software package. 3 LOS = Level of service 4 Designated CMP intersection. 5 Control delay, expressed in seconds per vehicle, is presented for the worst movement/approach for the unsignalized intersection. 6 Observed delay was less than the calculated delay. 16 fp FEHR & PEEßS ,"~~~.~'U'!U~ ~~",u,'Ufl 4J J-D ( . l Stevens Creek BI'Id. @ N NOT TO SCALE LEGEND '" .J . Turn Lane "m ~~ ~:=. XX (YY) - AM (PM) Peak Hour ~ . Project Location ::¡:;: ~~ I ~695(503) Traffic Volumes ~ - Traffic Signal JH í 412 (545) o Study Intersection ~ - Stop Sign ~"'N8Romf1' - t \lr Hom..stead~. rì~ _m '<1".::- Cm ~- MM M' ~, .Ave " " . ¡ , . ~ i . P.Im.....R4(E) L'6(2B2) II- Ñ<õ' ~M <J:!.~ c~ mN ~! ~I 1'0 ~~ g: íD""!.;b .....ciM' ;::ss ~M~ '-'.-0> ......0..... ~¡j~ ~¡ll¡i¡~I_I......._ ~¡~l L 47 (112) --26(60) r¡= 119 (40B) 103!"0I--.l'il!\r 43132¡.J 'illlr 555 603 == .--~ 35 21 T 224345 -, g:;:;¡?2 85(128 m~N £2.C!.c O~N C""".C .....:::.<.0 ~""" ~~o <.Cg:~ NmM m ~. ... . 5 Wolfe Rd IPefltTl8' 6' 1'0 ~ Œ~ _0 N'" ~.ci ~~ NN C~ ~<o N~ ~m ~~ JHH J HI .- ~ P....,....R<J.IW) 633(434) d Ilr 272 (574) =¡1 = 14 (44)ì NO '<t.t:.. C<o r ~O m~ 0. ~Nr:- N~M ~mM ~~;- -L 201 (258) MM...... ::::::743(738) J H l r¡= 11B (224) '''.'''''.-..J III- 414 (69B):!J ì 444(804) == $~-:;; 87(62)T ~S::~ --~ mMm N~ ~~ ,321 ...1-,5 (55 --11544 (=132 (94 + tõ;;;ëñ ~~t:. <.D.....~ ô ;::- __0 ~N_ --- <0-<0 N~~ --!}-- ---< ""'"";~;;131 ::!J 1,196(1,684 = 9(21 T (32) (19B) (115) 16 45 44 -L í ;::- a:; ~_M --- <0-<0 _o~ + L r¡= N N~§ __M ~8~ ~m~ J ¡Hl].. 104 (369) 3 (15) 42 (156: ~ + -:;;;=-;;; ~-- -0_ ~ - M m M .J T ~ v,*oPOIvty 28 (1171 95195 40 92 ìlll- ~~~ MNM ~""--=' mSN ,....g~ ., --.I f V~~"Pk..,. 30 (4381 1(13 14 {198 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS- BACKGROUND CONDITIONS FIGURE 6 Residtor>lõol\ Gcophõcs \ Ocl05\Fig6_bcckgrour>dlv.dwg FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATrON CONSULTANTS Oct Z5. Z005 PC N:\Pcojeels\SJ05-80S Volleo Nor1.hwt!' L ~ y · ' , Draft Vallco Northwest Resjdential November 2005 -- 4. PROJECT CONDITIONS The impacts Of the proposed residential development on the surrounding roadway system are discussed in this chapter. First, the methodology used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the project Is described. Then, the results of the level of service calculations for Project Conditions are presented. Project Conditions are defined as Background Conditions plus traffic generated by the proposed project. A comparison of the intersection operating levels under Background and Project Conditions are presented, and the impacts of the project on the study intersections are discussed. Site access, on-site circulation, and parking are also addressed in this chapter. PROJECT TRAFFIC ESTIMATES The amount of traffic added to the roadway system by a proposed development project is estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation. (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. The first step estimates the amount of added traffic to the roadway network. The second step estimates the direction of travel to and from the project site. The trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning movements during the third step. The resuits of the process for the proposed Vallco Northwest residential project are described in the following sections. Trip Generation The amount of traffic added to the surrounding roadway system by the proposed 156 condominiums was estimated by applying appropriate for the AM and PM peak hours trip generation rates published in Trip Generation (7th Edition) by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) The peak-hour trip generation rates and trip estimates are presented in Table 5, The proposed condominium project is estimated to generate 937 daily trips, 74 AM peak-hour trips (13 inbound and 61 outbound) and 87 PM peak-hour trips (58 inbound and 29 outbound). TABLE 5 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES AND ESTIMATES AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Use Daily In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates 1 Proposed Condominiums 6.01 0.08 0,39 0.47 0,37 0,19 0.56 Trip Estimates Proposed Condominiums (156 d,u.) 937 13 61 74 58 29 87 Notes: 1 Trip rates are expressed as trips per dwelling unit (d.u.). Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003. 18 fþ FWR & P[E~S ,~."S.OIr'IIOM to"'U':U" Lf- ;7-.03 Draft Vallco Northwest Residential November 2005 - Trip Distribution The directions of approach and departure for project traffic were estimated based on the existing travel patterns in the area and the relative locations of employment centers and other attractions such as schools, parks, and retail areas. In addition, information provided in the Census Transportation Planning Packet (CTPP) was used to help determine the trip distribution. The estimated general approach and departure directions are: North: 15 % on Wolfe Road East: 25 % on 1-280 5 % on Homestead Road 3 % on Pruneridge Avenue 12% on Stevens Creek Boulevard South: 8 % on Miller Avenue West: 15 % on 1-280 15% on Stevens Creek Boulevard 2 % on Homestead Road 100% The major directions of approach and departure form the trip distribution pattern for the project, and are illustrated on Figure 7. Most project traffic will approach and depart to 1-280 east and west, and to Wolfe Road north and south. Trip Assignment The project trips generated from the residential development were assigned to the roadway system based on the directions of approach and departure discussed above. Figure 8 shows the residential project trips assigned to each turning movement by intersection. The project trips were added to background traffic volumes to establish intersection volumes for Project Conditions shown on Figure 9. Although the proposed project will eliminate existing parking spaces and localized vehicle demand, no credit was taken for existing trips. This approach results in a conservative estimate of traffic and resulting operations. The displaced vehicles are expected to park elsewhere within the site. PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the proposed project to evaluate the operating conditions of the intersections and identify potential impacts to the local roadway system. The results of the intersection level of service calculations for Background and Project Conditions are presented in Table 6. This table also shows the changes in critical delay and volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) due to the addition of project traffic. Critical turning movements dictate how an intersection operates; therefore, Table 6 presents ¡he change in critical VIC, and delay, All of the key intersections are projected to operate at the same levels of service as Background Conditions with the proposed residential project. The levels of service calculation sheets are included in Appendix B. 19 fp FEHR & PH'" "'~H~""'tO~ ,~""U"U'1 Lf/;¡oL( Study Intersection Residential Project Distribution Project Location LEGEND . ~ X% 11( . @ : tev~s \Creek Blvd. 11( . 12% 15% 5% 11( .. Homestead Rd. .0 ~~ 3% :?$,..,. '", 11( .. "ø Ave. - <Ù > "" ~ ro ~ ~ ro f- 2% . .. 750, ~ I <Ù .¡; ~ .. ::; " '" ~ ~ ~ ~ E '¡: ~ Q. 11( . 15% <Ù .¡; >, w ~ ro ¡¡¡ N NOT TO SCALE PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 7 ResidenlõQI\ GrQphões \ O<:t05\Fõ9 7 _dislri.b~ tÕQn.dwg FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Oel 2.5, 2005 PC N;\PrQjects\5J05-805 Vallea NQrthwe + \ ~ \1'\ LEGEND ~ - Turn Lane ~ . Project Location XX IYY) . AM (PM) Peak Hour '" Traffic Volumes ~ - Traffic Signal ~ 0 M í3(15) _ Study Intersection ~ - Stop Sign I ·nONB"-, Homestead Rd. Ir ~ M~ ~ . -'. '" I BEl . Ave. I L38(18) , ~ , . " ~ " í ~ ¡ §: Æ ~ . ~ ¡¡ , I .. . tevens Creek Blvd ANolre R I I I ~a L'16) =-~ L113) ~w N~ -1(3) JL l... S<......t_~ - .,e__ - @ 2(9)~ '¡2¡- II 21, BE -- N NOT TO SCALE - RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 8 ¡;¡ N ¡ íO(2) 0(1), llr ~- .::,:!.::. _~N IIIiI!III ~ '" w ¡ 2(9), Ir ;::!:::. -~ N_ N . I § w ¡ - t §: - ( P........-R.. íO Ir E ~- , '" M ¡ "' '" w ~ (3) ~ p,"_..... ( Reside"t¡o¡\ Grophics \ Oo;:105 \f'g8_lrip_ossign.dwg Lo - l... v.,oP"", PEE RS CONSULTANTS VollcoNQrthwe FEHR& TRANSPORTATION OC( 2.5. 2005 PC N;\Projeds\SJ05-B05 ~ \S"' Location Projec1 Traffic Signal Stop Sign ~ ~ ~ Turn Lane AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Study Intersection LEGEND J xx IYY) . 695 (503) 1415 (560) ~ ¡¡¡ ~o ;:!O'!. ~:::. ~M ~~ ~~ JH 47(112: 26 (60) 119 (409) L rr= $ ~ N~ __M ;§;: ....C'.!.N N__ -¡Ill (115) (6101 (377) --L rr= " ~- ¡DLl1,;:b ~-- -M~ M~O ~~- -H¡~ I_lIONS......... " " . õ . ~ .. . . þ.........R.. ,14 (300) H-- NN ~~ <D,C ç~ ~N N' ~.' ~I Hr $$ ~~ ~=- ç~ ON ~~ M ,..01 ilHr 8~ C"'".=- .....:::...... ~~~ M~ ': J T '-- 43(32 35(21' 85 (128' 10a 413 '00 illlr ~íiìõ'ì M~~ MO~ -;¿;;; ~~O NOM q ~ , ¡170! 603 346 lIomom........ 103 555 224 L I r F:' ~ _0 ~Ñ ~;; o~ MO, JIH 21 (47) Ilr "'" MO "'",t:- ON N~ - dJ =¡t F:' 3M ~¿ N~ ~~ ~~ JI¡¡ 1·2!OSS"- (434 (583 633 274 , > < !I " @ N NOT TO SCALE :;;-M'ãì N_M ~~M ~~~ -L-202(261 MM.... ::=744 (741 J III rr= 118 (224 "....·~:769B) di ì ! I ~ 448 (806) ==- 6" M":;;- 89(63)T :::S;:~ --~ O~~ M~ -~ ,32 ;!.-.~ _N~ --- U'~N I MLl1N ::::::':i16 (61 -!L _1,544 S....n.C__ ,- ,132(94 39 (22'¡ di + ,196 (1,684 -- .-..; 9(21 __ <D~ TN......... ;;....~ 16 (33) 45 (1981 44(115 --L í r::: ãì ~_M --- ~-~ _0_ + L rr= + ~-~ ~-- -0- ~ - M ~ M J T ~ "''''''0''''''1 28 on! 95(95 40 (92 104 (369) 3(15) 42 {156' ìlj~ Gj'r:::r::- MNM t:::,.....=- o>:::'N __0 M- '" " .-.~N N .0 ~_M ~-- -~~ ~OM ~~~ J¡¡I~ "'oIIo:o~ 30(43al~ 1(13- 4(198 , PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS - PROJECT CONDITIONS FIGURE 9 Res;de~l;al\ G'ophics \ OdOS \Fi99 _pro jecll....dw'1 PEE RS CONSULTANTS Vc~co Ncrthwe FEHR & TRANSPORTATION Del 25, 200S PC N:\Projeds\SJ05-605 +- ~ -.:, " ,- ' Draft Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 - TABLE 6 BACKGROUND AND PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Background Project Peak ôin Crit !1in Crit Intersection Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS V/C' Delay' 1, Homestead Road I Wolfe Road AM 26,9 C 26.8 C +0,003 0.0 PM 46,5 D 46.6 D +0,003 +0.2 2, Prune ridge Avenue I Wolfe Road AM 20,3 C+ 20.2 C+ +0,004 0,0 PM 31.7 C 31,7 C +0,003 0.0 3. Wolfe Road 11-280 NB Ramps' AM 12,8 B 12,8 B +0.004 +0.1 PM 13,6 B 13,9 B +0.010 +0.5 4. Wolfe Road 11-280 SB Ramps' AM 11.2 B+ 11,2 B+ +0.007 0.0 PM 11.0 B+ 11,1 B+ +0,007 +0.1 5. SB Wolfe Road I Perimeter Road ryv¡' AM 10.3 B_ , 10.4 B nla nla - - , PM 13.9 B 14.0 B nla nla 6. NB Wolfe Road I Perimeter Road (E} 6 AM 12.1 B 12,7 B nla nla PM 28.5' D 31.4' D nla nla 7. Valleo Parkway I Wolfe Road AM 17.6 B 17,5 B 0.000 0.0 PM 54.4 0- 54.4 0- +0,001 +0.1 8. Valleo Parkway I Perimeter Road AM 17.8 B 17.8 B 0,000 0.0 PM 19.5 B- 19,5 B- 0,000 0,0 9 Stevens Creek Boulevard I Perimeter AM 8,3 A 8.6 A +0.001 +0.1 Road PM 16.2 B 16.4 B 0,000 0.0 10, Stevens Creek Boulevard I Wolfe AM 36.8 0+ 36.9 0+ +0.003 +0.1 Road6 PM 42.6 D 42,8 0 +0,003 +0,2 Notes: 1 AM = morning peakMhour, PM = evening peak-hour. 2 lNhöle intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturaUon flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County CondiUons. 3 LOS = Level of service 4 Change in the critical volume-toMcapacity ratio 0//C) between Background and Project Conditions. 5 Change in critical movement delay between Background and Project Conditions. 6 Control delay, expressed in seconds per vehicle, is presented for the worst movemenUapproach for the unsignalized intersection. Change in criUcal delay and V/C is not used to identify impacts for unsignalized intersections. 7 Observed delay was less than the calculated delay. 8 Designated CMP intersection. 23 fP FEHR & PHRS ;..~~..".t"'o. couw:'ua Lt- ..)D8 - Draft Va/lea Northwest Residential November 2005 - SCHOOL TRAFFIC According to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) model, approximately 10 percent of residential trips during the AM peak hour are schooi trips. Applying this percentage to the outbound AM peak hour trips, the proposed project would generate 6 school trips. The eiementary and middle schools for this project are located to the west of the project site. Trips from the project site to these schools would use Perimeter Road to Stevens Creek Boulevard. The high school for this project is iocated on Finch Avenue south of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Trips from the project site would use Perimeter Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard to Finch Avenue to access the high school. These schooi trips would not be noticeable to nearby residents. INTERSECTION IMPACT CRITERIA Signalized Intersections Implementation of the proposed project would result in a significant impact if the addition of project traffic causes one of the following: 1. The level of selVice at a Cupertino-monitored intersection operating at LOS D or better under Background Conditions to deteriorate to LOS E or F; or 2, An increase in the critical movement delay at a Cupertino-monitored intersection operating at LOS E or F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an increase in the critical VIC ratio by 0.01 or more; or 3. Degradation of the level of selVice at a CMP-monitored intersection operating at LOS E or better under Background Conditions to LOS F; or 4. An increase in the critical movement delay at a CMP-monitored intersection operating at LOS F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more 'seconds and an increase in the critical VIC ratio by 0.01 or more. According to these criteria, the project will not cause a significant impact to any of the key signalized intersections. All of the key signalized intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours. Unsignalized Intersections For this analysis, traffic impacts at unsignalized intersections are defined to occur when the addition of project traffic causes: 1. Intersection operations to deteriorate from an acceptable level under Background Conditions (LOS D or better) to an unacceptable level (LOS E or worse) and the Caltrans Peak Hour Volume Warrant is met under Project Conditions; or 2. The exacerbation of operations at an unsignalized intersection already operating at an unacceptable level (LOS E or worse) under Background Conditions and the Caltrans Peak Hour Volume Warrant is met under Project Conditions. Based on the project impact criteria listed above, the proposed project will not cause a significant impact to any of the key unsignalized intersections. All of the key unsignalized intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better. . 24 fp FHIR & PEERS ,uws~H"n~" t~.,~"u" L(/ ",-00 , ' Draft Val/co Northwest Residential November 2005 -- INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES The results of the analysis indicate that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on any of the key intersections during both peak hour periods. Therefore, no measures are required to mitigate any project impacts. SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION Access to the project site is provided via one driveway on Perimeter Road. Just east of the project site, Perimeter Road tunnels underneath Wolfe Road. Vehicles accessing the project site from Woife Road will use the loop ramps to Perimeter Road. The number of driveways is sufficient to accommodate the projected traffic volumes generated by the development. Stop signs should be provided on all four legs at the driveway intersection with Perimeter Road. A secured emergency vehicle access lane is provided along the western boundary of the project site. Sidewalks and bike lanes are provided along Wolfe Road near the project site and a paved pedestrian paseo (also selVing as secured emergency vehicle access) is provided along the western edge of the property. We recommend that a pedestrian connection to Wolfe Road be provided at the southeastern portion of the project site to facilitate access to the sidewalks. In addition, we recommend that a pedestrian and bicycle connection be provided between the pedestrian paseo and the residential neighborhood to the west possibly via Auburn Drive. This connection would allow walking and biking trips to the two schools in the neighborhood. Figure 10 illustrates the recommended changes to the site plan. No other modifications to on-site circulation are recommended. Impacts to transit are considered significant if the proposed project conflicts with existing or planned transit facilities or generates potential transit trips without adequate transit capacity or adequate facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists to access transit stops. Based on typical transit mode split in Santa Clara County of 2% to 5%, up to 4 peak-hour transit trips would be generated by the proposed project. These new transit trips would have a negligible effect on existing selVice. Direct transit selVice to the site is not provided. However, existing transit routes on Wolfe Road are provided within one-quarter mile of the project site. PARKING The current site plan indicates 314 (307 covered spaces and 7 uncovered guest spaces) spaces provided. The site plan shows seven guest parking spaces are provided at the southeast corner of the project site near the entrance to the underground parking area. The City of Cupertino's Municipal code for condominiums requires 1 covered and 1 uncovered space for every residential unit. The required number of par1<ing spaces based on the City's code is 312 spaces. Therefore, the number of proposed par1<ing spaces exceeds the city requirements by two spaces. The project should also provide 62 Class I bicycle par1<ing spaces. The project will also be removing approximately 550 parking spaces for the Vallco shopping center. These spaces should be replaced with the redevelopment of Vallco shopping center. Otherwise, there may be a parking deficiency for retail users of the shopping center, To ensure use of guest parking spaces by guests and not retail patrons, we recommend that "No Vallco Parking" signs with a warning of towed vehicles should be installed. 25 fp FEHI\ & PEI'I\S '"~"H"'''¡IO" (6"U""" tf-)-IO -. BUILDING"A: 3 STORY BUILDING B: 3 STORY BUILDING c: 3 STORY BUILDING E: 2 STORY BUILDING F: 2 STORY "TOTAL 1 BEDROOM D.U.: 29 TOTAL 2 BEDROOM D.U.: 99 TOTAL TOWNHOUSE D.U. (3 BEDROOM): 28 TOTAl O.U. ON THREE FLOORS: 156 lAND AREA: 5.19 ACRE RATIO: 30 DU PER ACRE , ~otential Bicycle ! _ t 1:_,¥~, ' ¿;:,::::'~!- ,..~';::::::''!ii. _ __ ,,_._~_' _ _ ' ._', ' c' 13, ,. _____ Connection': _' -;::-;1,/ _ --='-:¡-i:.: 'L::.:..rJ/:' ,;;C:~,-,:-,_.-.... __,_, ' "I - - ~¿, ,--,-..,.~----'---- \' ="'1" "j ".' ':.' ,~~:i%--JLi ," r ~-~~':-"":DI ,'-' 3OL.~......;.~~;.:;""J:J! ¡ \, /..." ...--... ...._.....'~ I,,' ,',','~' ",,,,, " . I JD,-,~, '..' "- ....., " ... ..& ,.., ~,' i~ ·1 r:-:::DS , .' ,- - -,........~ ',' , /, \ '] ,,~~ "" """ "I ' : ,_ -,c,' ' -, I ~~-I \ "- ! , ' .""."...., "" ~_.- -- ,~",- , ,;t-'-"' __,I ' ---'" -'~ ~,- ,-' _I J ":,1;""\ --- " n¿,",;Çt\,)J(",í::l:):;',c) /- ""£$" ,__. II -~ ,"sM\"~" ",' J;/A,,;,:~.,.L\"~,'~Òt,~',·,lj"~,),'-;~::=:...1,,,::::,,·:~·:,,_·\"'f: '/' , I Î' f;' ,-<' "," \y'- _~,_"'c""f' " c 'ìf"....,.. " '," ';!;/.l ' . .,^ ,'~ ,c-C" '", <, " ' ~jiJT''-'-''- ~ . · . ,/1 ' ... ~,7,,~\,s:,".)O,-·_..,·"~\' ", '^ -,~ ",JI --....'.. " ,I "''''''''' "7:<:/"" ""~.'c -,'- - ,.~~---~ - . - I ."""',/ ", ,c:.>,c':'\;:' ".. ..'..,' ,d"'·..'-""'·-t' . < . k <' ,..... . -, __ ("''VI c'" ,...../., ' ~---- ," . ,,'< ,... ; - /" . . .c ~};;\,1,~#'2'~ " f·' " ."",f. ," ',' ,m~~""""''''''''''''/ I' "/' ' ..' ,..,.'~" _," " /;/ /: .~_ "", ' / '";'--'/-;t."~' , . // / ", '. I: ...y. ", J.:' /,( ,''', \ ¡ \ .,'..- . ¡- ~ \ ¡' -- ¡,ReCREAnON] \ ! "''''~' " .. :~'JO" tilJ.L,~" 1"':7"':-_ IGœ8f')' ,\'_ -', '-.' ,_,un "-COHTRCII.·' V ""it"!:' ~"'"..:: ~,- ~ ¡ ::F7-- ,~ _ ··>.r SuRFAGÉ J ~IÆST'> , \}f1[ .. , PARKING STALLS ON GRACE: +'·7 COVERED PARKING STAlLS: +'-3D7 TOTAL PARKING OVERAll. :i'/· 314 RECOMMENDED SITE PLAN CHANGES FIGURE 10 () o .. ,,' FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Nov 29, 2005 PC N:\Projecb\Non Sf projec~s\SJ05-805\fig10_rocDmsjtepla".dw9 ~.-" . +- \ ~ · ' .-, - . Draft Vallco Northwest Residential November 2005 - 5. CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS This chapter presents an analysis of Cumulative Conditions with the proposed residential project. Cumulative No Project Conditions are defined as existing volumes plus traffic generated by approved but not yet constructed developments that will add traffic to streets in the project study area, plus traffic generated by pending developments. Trips from the proposed residential project are added to the Cumulative No Project Conditions to obtain Cumulative plus Project Conditions. This chapter describes the procedure used to determine the cumulative traffic volumes and the results of the level of service analysis for Cumulative Conditions. CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ESTIMATES A list of pending projects was obtained from the Cities of Cupertino, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara. The description and assignment of pending project trips to each intersection is provided on worksheets included in Appendix C. Figure 11 presents the Cumulative No Project volumes. The trips generated by the proposed residential project were added to the Cumulative No Project Condition volumes and the resulting volumes are shown on Figure 12 CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection operations were evaluated with level of service calculations under Cumulative plus Project Co_ndi\icms, and the ref;ults are summarized withl3ackgrou~ß ConditIQ,nªin,Table].Tl1e_Background ConditionL serve as a baseline for determining cumulative impacts. The intersection of Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway is projected to degrade to LOS E during the PM peak hour under Cumulative plus Project Conditions. The unsignalized intersection of Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road is projected to worsen to LOS E during the PM peak hour under Cumulative plus Project Conditions. The remaining intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours. The Wolfe RoadNallco Parkway intersection is projected to degrade from LOS D under Background Conditions to a deficient level of service (LOS E) under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. Cumulative No Project Conditions were calculated for this intersection to determine the project contribution at this intersection under Cumulative Conditions. Table 8 presents the Cumulative No Project and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions as well as the project contribution percentage. The project contribution at the Wolfe RoadNallco Parkway intersection during the PM peak hour is 1.7 percent. This is not considered to be a significant contribution. Therefore, the project's cumulative impact at this intersection is considered less than significant. Although the calculated LOS for the Perimeter Road and Northbound Wolfe Road intersection is E, existing field observations indicate that the actual delay for the side street is 50 percent lower than the calculated delay. Given the existing observations and the fact that the calculated delay is on the border for LOS DIE, we don't consider this a significant impact. fp FEll" & PEERS j"~¡~..'''IQ. '''"'"':~~'\ 27 if - ;2-1,),-- LEGEND '" J . Turn Lane '" N_ ~ ~ - Project Location N- ÑN $N -woo __0 ~" XX (YY) - AM (PM) Peak Hour :£,...;~ ;;o.nC ~t:!. ~ =-~'ö' _W~ L57(116) MO Traffic Volumes - Traffic Signal M~~ -'- 110 (116) ,....N.N ~oo ~:699(519) W~~ N__ ~~ . - Study Intersection -II¡~ --413(610) --¡Hl -- 26 (60) JH ~ . Stop Sign fr 231 (418) fr 155 (425) (:415(558) Home"_Rd. ilHr '-"'"43!32 J ilHr I.,"ONØ~ 103117OI-.J !!r Homestead Rd 555 603 =:: 3521IT ~~~ 85 (128 êñLñtõ ~I 228 360 , ~NM O~~ ¡¡;a Cr:t:!. !:!."?:=. WM . N::'N r--:::'<"") ¿~ ~ ~;;~ Woo~ W~ w~ " "" ~.T . - ^'. C<, 4 Wolfe Rd ¡1-280 58 Rdrnps 5 Wolfe Rd IPemnetcr Rd. (W) 6 II1II 'r Rd (E) , A.. ~ '" ~ ~ _0 1 ~d _N ~ci "-~ "'~ OOM NW L76(282) W" N- ~- -"" · J HH J HI ~ · · ~ ~,"05BIIarrp> P......R..{W) p,"."....Ró.IU W 635 (442) d !!r ! II- , , , 284 (616) =¡1 ê'i'in' 14(44)ì Œíi3' " WM 00 ~'C Stevens Creek 8lod. <!:!.c, CM "'~ r ooN oo~ 0 w~ ~, ~i 7 Vallco Pkwy /Wolfe Rd 8 Vallco Pkwy ¡Pcmneler Rd , Creek Blvd ¡Perimeter Rd 10 Stevens Creek Blvd./Wo!fe Rd $ N~:g ¡:::- 65' õ ¡::::- Õì~~ ~-~ ~~~ ~-- ~_M ~_o !£.~!3 ;-gG -~- ...L 16 (32) ~N~ J..¡15 (55) L 136 (438) --- ooow -'- 225 (293) w-w w-w ~~- ~o~ -- 86 (272~ N~~ NWW J¡Hlk- ~3(15) + -!¡- ::=,1.599 (1.413) ~M~ :::=. 773 (807) frs, (16') ~ í46(123 ,132(94) JHl fr 128 (249) V"IcOPboJ ¡III- v.. """1 + s,......CaII<BMI + s,....,C_8/wo ~ ¡II!- - @ 30 (4381-.J 28 !'17¡ J ~ 37(213) dJ 424(735~ ~ '(13- 128214 --- ú3'~õì 465 (872 --- 14 (198 , U:;-'iD-¡:;ï' ~~~ ,227(1.790~ == oo-í=='Cõ MM~ 40(92 T ~-- ~.s.c:. 87(62 T W~~ NN~ -0_ 9(21 T ~~- ~¿';; ~ - ID"':O¡ --~ N M m - m~o _~o M NW~ ~~ _00 '" NOT TO SCALE - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FEHR & PEE RS AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS- TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT CONDITIONS Od 25, 2005 eo N,\Projeds\SJ05-805 Volleo Northwest Resident'ol\Grophics\Od05\Fig11 _curnnoprojecHv.dw, FIGURE 11 +- , \-J - \tJ LEGEND '" .J . Turn Lane '" N 5' ~ - Project location N_ '"~ .-gca ......cið ~o. XX (YY) . AM (PM) Peak Hour :£...::e ;;co.c. ~~ ~ ~-- -~'" MM Traffic Volumes - Traffic Signal ;::;'~~ ...L 110 (116) ...I'>!.N L57 (116) ~'" H='699 (519) ~"'~ N__ ~'" . - Study Intersection - Stop Sign --W~ -- 413 (610) -¡Ill -- 26 (60) J\I í ;418 (573) ~ r¡= 231 ('20) r¡= 155 ('26) p.............."- ',110"1 1031170¡ --1 i1l\r 43132¡.J i1llr Hr Homestead Rd. 3521 555603 == $GÑ' 85 (128 T ãì~ 228361, ~NM o"'~ ~~ C.....~ C"1.C ~M M::''OI' r-..c... U'.~ NON ~o~ ~O N~M "'~ "'~ ~ O. ~. "'7 . ~I -¡" '~ Ife Rd 11-280 58 Rmnps 5 Wolfe Rd !Pemneter Rd (\IV) , ¡Perimeter Rd {E} 0 ,.. '" '" ~ ~ ~ _0 _N ~ :Qci ;::ci "'~ "'~ ffi~ o~ L 1:14 (300) " ~~ M": J IIH . JHI < ! 1·110 se """" P...,....~..IWI P....._R..{ET . " III- ~ 635('42) ~ Hr . 286 (625) =¡¡ ~N 21 (47)ì $Ñ l ~~ ~C Stevens Creek Bwd. "'!.!::. ~'" ~~ . ON r ",N < ~'<I" ~i j¡ , :; Valleo Pkwy.M1olfe Rd 8 Valko Pkwy ¡Pcrlmeter Rd Creek Blvd /Perlmeter Rd o Stevens Creek Blvd /Wolfe R. . N- N"=:~ r:- õ'ì ~--~ mÑ<D ~~~ ~~~ ~-- ~_M -L 16 (33) ~N_ ~ec -~~ L 136 (438) -~- --- .J..i16 (61) ...L 226 (2961 "'~~ ~-~ ~-N 000 ~"'~ ~o~ - 86 I"'! M~N N~~ J HIll:- -3(15) ~ll,599(1.413) ~M~ ==774 (810) r¡=51 (161) ~ + í'6123 ~I- ,32 (9, Jill r¡= 128 (249) V"~o"""Y ì!lt- V.op-, + S<.......c.-aw + S....n.C'__ -.J ìlll- ~ @ 30 {4381--1 281117! .J 39 {222! dJ 424 (735) :::'} 1(13 - 14 {198 , 'iñÑ'M' 128214-- ~-~ ,227(1.790 = <ò:õ;:'cn 469(874~- 861'õ3' M~ ~ 'O{92T ~-- 9(21 T ed:::. 89(63 T ~~~ NN~ -0_ ~~- ;;;¿¡g ~ - ~~'" --~ N M '" ,- 000 ~'" M M~ _ ~- ~'" .., NOT TO SCALE - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FEHR & PEE RS AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS- TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS Oel lS. zoos PC N:\Projects\SJOS-805 Volleo Norlhwest Residentiol\Grop,,¡cs\Oct05\Fic;12_cumprojecUv,dw9 FIGURE 12 ~ ~ - -L I· Y , Draft Val/co Norihwest Residential - November 2005 ' -- TABLE 7 BACKGROUND AND CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Background Cumulative Plusproject Peak ßin Crit tlin Crit Intersection Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay' VIC' 1. Homestead Road i Wolfe Road AM 26.9 C 27,2 C +0.7 +0,025 PM 46.5 D 48,1 D +3.1 +0,047 2. Pruneridge Avenue I Wolfe Road AM 20,3 C+ 21,2 C+ +1.4 +0.031 PM 31.7 C 32,5 C- +0,8 +0,032 3. Wolfe Road 11-280 NB Ramps' AM 12,8 B 13.0 B +0.4 +0.022 PM 13.6 B 15,7 B +3,2 +0.057 4, Wolfe Road 11-280 SB Ramps· AM 11,2 B+ 11.2 B+ +0.2 +0.030 PM 11.0 B+ 11,7 B+ +1.4 +0,079 5. SB Wolfe Road I Perimeter Road (W)' AM 10,3 " B 10,6, B m n/a n/a - _u PM 13,9 B 14.8 B n/a n/a 6. NB Wolfe Road I Perimeter Road (E) ',7 AM 12.1 B 13.0 B n/a n/a PM 28,5 D 38,6 E n/a n/a 7. Valleo Parkway I Wolfe Road AM 17.6 B 19.3 B- +2.4 +0,042 PM 54.4 D- 67.5 E +12,5 +0.059 8. Vallco Parkway I Perimeter Road AM 17,8 B 17.3 B -0.6 +0.012 PM 19,5 B- 19.4 B- -0,1 +0.023 9 Stevens Creek Boulevard I Perimeter Road AM 8.3 A 8,5 A +0.1 +0,012 PM 16,2 B 15.9 B -0.4 +0.021 10, Stevens Creek Boulevard I Wolfe Road' AM 36,8 D+ 37,3 D+ +0,7 +0.027 PM 42.6 D 45.5 D +3,5 , +0,048 Notes: 1 AM = morning peak·hour. PM = evening peak-hour. 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX level of service analysis software package. 3 LOS = Level of service 4 Change in critical movement delay between Background and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. 5 Change in the critical volume-to-capacity ratio 0I/C) between Background and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. 6 Control delay, expressed in seconds per vehicle, is presented for the worst movemenVapproach for the unsignalized intersection. Change in critical delay and VlC is not used to identify impacts for unsignalized intersections. 7 Observed delay was less than the calculated delay. 8 Designated CMP intersection. 30 fp FaiR & PEERS '"U'S~\"'~HO" ~ø"'"<""" L}... .:;2-1 š' , '. Draft Vallco Northwest Residential November 2005 -- TABLE 8 CUMULATIVE NO PROJECT AND PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project Peak A in Grit AinCrit Project Intersection Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS V/C' Delay' Contribution 7, Vallco Parkway I Wolfe Road AM 19.3 B- 19.3 B- 0,000 0.0 0% PM 67.3 E 67,5 E +0.001 +0,1 1.7% Notes: 1 AM = morning peak·hour, PM = evening peak~hour. 2 Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County Conditions. LOS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX level of service-analysis software package.--- 3 LOS = Level of service 4 Change in the critical volume-to·capacity ratio (V/C) between Cumulative No Project and Project Conditions. 5 Change in critical movement delay between Cumulative No Project and Project Conditions. 6 Control delay, expressed in seconds per vehicle, is presented for the worst movement/approach for the unsignalized intersection. Change in critical delay and VIC is not used to identify impacts for unsignafized intersections. 7 Observed delay was less than the calculated delay. 8 Designated CMP intersection. fp FEI'IR & PEERS '"'.S~~.'~-no. ~o~.,,<'."'~ 31 Lt ~ .).-1 iß ') trJ ~ ::r: >-< t;1j >-< >-ì (1 r"A:.I!.!£. '" ';:oJ\l1Sj j""f{r,(. ." ~~- X-1".(..u.sn (l.E.f"IøoJf.P LM,e.p,,¡J R,ef",r.,j BAI4<.j' o o 0 \) , ¡ ! \0 \..~ .5L- , i § ,~ ~~ ~> 2w --->-~ \ ......... """":<-.:: :íl+rLi i'O"",""'\Ä '! . . , , ~/~$ pM p,,.' ft';M,r¡"-1- ==J ¡2.p/lO L-1Vt-ïJ dlJ . - ------ BASSD .,v ?JV,.... ' -=-' £fJW IJ¡S'~ r¡...J"l:tJJ···-·'· - -~~/'/ ~, --"-.. !EI: (714) 850 3400 fax: (714)8503499 6th Floor 600 Antcn Boulevard, Costa Mes,'I,92626 ProjeC1 Project 5.....J.1!.,.. 1"::;(/ J-+-t-:-----+~-'-----t IJ s I~ l.1 ~" -t: \ ~ ~ EXHIBIT D PROJECT SUMMARY ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED - Gfosssitearea 1225,765 same i(5.19 ac,) 154,750 s.f, nc1uderec room and daycare) 0,69 560 stalls 278 stalls (Estimated) (278 covered stalis) (7 stalis at grade) N/A Parking Tota Approx.75,500 s.f. Approx, 34,500 s.f, P (CG, ML, R) Resideritial+ Daycare"Center 2 and 3 stories above grade 1 sub level 45' max 175,0' 175.5' N/A Residentia 7,300 s.f, 137 total DU 34 82 21 109.000 sJ. same Commerciail Residential 1 f. f. P (CG. ML Hotel) 206,500 s (4.37 ac.) N/A (doesTIot N/A 99 000 s N/A N/A N/A N/A 175.0' 175,5' N/A , I I I , He¡ght Building pad elevation Curb elevation I Number of empioyees projected! Parking I of bUilding structure Total residential un 1 BR 2BR 3BR Zoning designation (Heart of the City Specific Plan Valioo Fashion Park & Vicinity) COUnt !3eneralPlandesígnátîon t ~pursOfOpèr~tion g{¡sting'use Building area EXISTif'¡G FJoör.ar8aratio Pc;&Ë'TRANSfQRMER Nùmberofstories Proposed use Landscape Perimeter Courtyards site area Pavingaréá Net UTiUTY 'eASEMENT '*'..,.,"-...,;....."":'_"''''''''.~,#'. ~.'~ ~ .~if .. '....J ....'if '';¡"~.J1 ç# .~. 1:;<"1; 1:>"" 0- §;A:. DRAKE DRIVE ~ æ C i€ c æ C ~ 463.53' EXISTINGBlOCKWALL ·.',C_ ~. ø _ .....:.. ~:. ....:.. 'i-_'~:·'.i"':.· ':---',-',-:- J Iªð.Çj ÞRQPJBTY f'7Ò7f~;:....#~r~th~tT7t##7 20'-0" LANDSCAPEDPERMEA6lEfJREACCES$LANEY' . 'JJl;R£P.1.(¡¡¡¡;LK . - RECRE~!jPN AREAY·.·Yi. A¡>Pf¡OX:20,ÙÖ05, fìECJiEA!I()NI R()()M.........·............. lßOO$,f¢,' ~Š~~,··············.·············.i·............·.·.·.···.··········'7'..·~7...,,0·.""'······.··········J: .Qf\¡\1T9ŒMš(¡)'S'- ,·····················~···~····b1 fBpl\JMLI\!'IP2ç"r~p< ei ...·.·.·..·..·.·..·.··..·..J::{)lJ~TyI\R[)<....·....·..·.....". ABEA:APPBOX,1(),OPOSf 14575' " y .. ~£E(TRICAlEASEMENT .................. ..-c FROMPROJ :r*1 @15 NÒRVi'ICHAvWUE ~ Q 1= " æ ~ \: " '" N EXISTJNGTiOAD '4:.; I ,.. '.~" ~;pBL?~r:~1.~ tn .--. "fIIt·.:JIlili.iH ........ . .~.·..·...·..·.··..·,.··7·s 408.52 ~20'.~" 17- ...._.._._."'~ , ~~ .1 CÖVEREDWAU< 140'0:0" ?;¡i.\.¡"~ O'f'< ß\I~Dm~E~¡JJn'¡¡';2~1' ........:.¡....:APeRO)t1:&;"'t"<fJiCt·:..:.·..:·\·· ;.....;... - """*^:>? "-.. .. i./::>:::::/:Y::·:\Ú:/::?::5y::.//:n/:, ........"......,..';":,....,..........,...,,..,..':.,.......,...,................,............ ~:..~~:.'JJNi.;..¡;;;;;.::;;;;;.;...;;;;;;..;;;;;;.:..:,;;;,;;,:,;;;,;;,;;;,;,;.."'":.:""""."'": !J¡~ITPf·ßI\1~~q tP9IqM~f\N.pSc:f)~~.9 .···.::·.:·.···.:.·.·:·.c:9lJßTXA~().:.·.·:.·.·..·.:.·..·:.'. AREA:Af'Pf¡OX:24;SOOSF ~<COMMON j)pENAf\EA APrROX' +¡,iSsOOS.f. {JAY(:j\RE q~TER ¡ APPROX.4ÖÖO SF L.......____. \ \ I , I I , ¡ I , I _f! I" I¡¡ '::}:' I~ ¡ \ IiI I, II I , , \ , I I : . 1: I b :V".! M o M (ENTER Of EXISTING ROAD' I I ¡ J. I I , fJRE DEPARTNlENTACCESS GATEsWITHKNOXBOX BIKE PATH - I PARKING 1 I STRUCTURE , j 2D'FR9NT SETBACK I I I I J I I ) '1 1¡ I, j, I EXISTINGROADTO .8ERE'DJRECTED NE\~¡$!REET 1N1J-'ROVEMENT LAYOUT 20'F~ONT SETBACK PBõP-qSE[) lREST~~RANT I I I , 109,000 s.f. Cornrnpn.LJsaþlearea '(H.O,T.C, requires 150 s.f.IOU = 23,400s.f.) 38.500 s.f 11,000 s.f. COmmer; recreatiOn:area Pr¡\fatéoutdp()r~Þé3ce{ba c()n¡é~& .tèrré3pés) '(H.O,T.C. requires 60 s fJDU = 8,340 s.f.) pLAYGROUND AREA APPRÖKS;oüOS:r. I '----'-' I CENTER Of EXISTINGHOAù D.U.-Dweiling Units 'H.O,T.C.- Heart of the City Specific Plan I I RE('EIVRD ! Site Plan and Project Summary SHEET 02 ¡ , SCALE: . ~ Hi JOßNO, 03<~BB,1? i,;Þ,'''';:'S,;¡h'Z,J: BY: IUMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CAUFORNI A N I CONDOM 160 ·n;lsHi)011.p(i,N;,¡,~;:,Ülnr0;~¡li,T")li. (/;+r¡;,"¡,-'(};-:itJ,£¡N,$·?)q,I!',~;~,;;¡;V .·:')£·N."(8~'A1JCÚ:P;;-i}/!i,'0,i) H' r¡nS!'Ü,".H"~. BLSN Cic~\,-,,jI'E¡)i'i';0¡,;$ül);-<Cf,s ,,,-,,,.wtÞ£U,1'?J:'ü',nc .!1Q\Yn~d'WEV~:',\\;'~ÆNf) "E~p-o,m5),;~\':r01< IT'!', ~,C'CiH~;·C~>;,LL'3;!".ÞiW;(; ,,,rv,t1l.S.N'DTKi' :;!-öE~M $HYf0 0N :I),"~ f-\',,,",, \\'I.L ¡;t1.Ä:";"'~ bÜRi,,'¡'¡ ·T.i'f.··.t'I,~lb'j 'f'~'-";E,,~ 'sO 40 20' o GATE \)1·03'00 R. .''-' Cb:~,1M , <, , .. " ,/,.'/! '/ 1'1... N;:,:' "',,"~ ",,,~" ')ti '." , () , , , 'J. ;;!,ii , , , . ; .c, ,,' () n , f" '," , , c' , .. . f.' y , ,,", .'_f'! , , {, i' ;\ , ;', 5 Perkowitz + Ruth AR·C.H··¡T.E··CT i j , i I Master Plan SHEET 01 J08NO. 03-288.17 DATE 01·03·06 ARCHFE <~-5 --- ¡-"^ ¡ I _.---..J PROPOSED 4 - LEVEL PARKIKG STRUCTURE 760 STALLS PROPOSED 139 ATTACHED CONDOMlNmMS & TOW"IHOUSES LA"IDMARK PROPERTIES M.A....NAGÐvŒNT Ibi!! V¡¡!icoFashlcr,Par'k 1012:; !';o~b Wolh E",~. $u!0 !'f~D, Çü~<'Ii01o U.9SÇ1; ---- - S\', , ~ '\' ~ /~' "':"- ;;."',- -~ s,Q ...,....Cr,. ,\,,"{ ~A' .(;., ,.,." "",'.'\" c /, C-----~ ** '" ,"" ~i" .;..'- "" '-,,'ò..... '- " PROPOSED 21 ¡-ROOM HOTEL SITE , ''''."",- J/ -¥ '" .- ~; ~- I I I %'" - 725 STALLS CONDOM N UMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ - LEVEL STRUCTURE ''''.'' ¡¿;~jj'1',¡ ._-~_._- ',,"----_"'-' -,-,,, - PROPOSED 3 PARKING - , \~'''''''''''''''_-':'''-- ",-"-._"'i/.-,,-._.:,,,._*_.--. . _.',"''''''- '-'1->1C:._.:'_.'I'._""___._.."."",,,,, ._'''''" I ,W -,,-~---.--. 2: -~ '1__~ z-..: ;- v, j ~ - , ~ 't. I ~ ~ .~ o u ,...¡ ..;.J < > I PROPOSED 6 - LEVEL PARKIKG STRUCTVRE J1 50 STALLS 1'H¡SfLOC'" "'i.ANN"'N.!.- '\"i,''W,TIÇ,·¡ ç.c)W.·\J¡j~CHéFf.IN:'~ P;;:~¡-'1.1N4:Y 'H¡: rr,',_RM;':;Ié>!, P¡;·~;'!¡L';',;;,' DI, TH'S ",,"N hl-;SH';;:n 0E,~I!',;NfD ,f~':i'" ,'DUJ-:\Té:Ti-A" We 1'¡-fM F'¡':,¡f6\J' '1'(:""':\'''T iN"',"",,,,_,,,," ¡-¡~: ¡;-~spœ~SIH C,' fJF' 'T'2__~,(;Clfl';-¡<Y ~~I I!VUß'",:;ë" 'F',,'MJ ,; -"1":,- "HE- USéS iE, ~:H,::\"N ')H T;.¡I:: ~,N' 'liE 'O-iNiGi', "\)'1'1')';' -, ~[. Df.',I(,~; ,"i,OCUT I ~ , I , , I " EB Co " " ~', F''''f,·C;-'' BLVD - , , , W'('¡,'T ~T' c': 2 ~: " , , , - VICINITY MAP , r L , :0_ " , , , L I:' , l\ , :: " , " , Perkowit%+Ruth ARC HI TEeT L operation N/A 'se Parking I use - Residential+ Daycare Center Zoning designation 1 P (CG, ML P (CG, ML, R) (Heart of the City Specific Plan I Hotel) Vallco Fashion Park & 'vicinity) , General Plan designation 1 Commercial! Residential ¡ Residential pavlngarea 1 7,300 sI, 1199,000 sJ, Landscape N/A 112,500sI Total Perimeter of building structure Approx,70,500 sJ, Courtyards Approx, 38,300 sI. Total residential unit count , N/A 139 total DU , , , , 1 BR 34 28R 84 38R 21 Common usable area '(H,O.T.C, requires 150 sJJDU = 23,400s.l,) 112,500s,(, Common recreation area 38,500 s.l, Private outdoor space (ba!conies &. terraces) 11,120 s,f. '(H,O,TC, requires 60 sI IDU = 8,340 s,(,) D, U, -Dwelling Units 'H,Q TC,- Heart of the City Specific Plan Site Plan and Project Summary l,\FDVh~K SHEET 02 " " '.',..>k' " . rn~)r'Trr" JOG No, ' .,h~,·\,\.;'ó.:>·· M/\.NÞ,-C¡EMJ0JT 03·28i:L1] " g" V3!too F¡;$hlon r~r~ DATE \u'2:; No~h,\M" Rç.c, "u~o ~i))ù, Ç"PNt,,~, CP, %01' 01'03·05 f / /\\' r ARCHlrËCTS PROJECT SUMMARY ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED - - Gross site area I , 225,765 same : (5,19 ac,) 560 stalls 278 stalls (Estimated) (278 covered stalls) (7 stalls at grade) same 156,500 sI, 0,69 2 and 3 stories above grade 1 sub leve 45' max 175.0 175,5 NIA 206,500 sI (437 ac,) N/A N/A N/A N/A 175,0 175,5' N/A Number of employees projected Building area EXISTING Floor area ratio f'G&f TRANSFORMER. Number of stories Height Building pad elevation Curb elevation Net site area 4ö Parking ....."-_..... ......0-.:.....-:-.-.-.- t --- ...--... ,--' ....-,;'... ;_tJ,i'fI' .. ." ; ,~ /~ ,/L.'io~ RECREATION ;Ø/,,~'),,6 . AREA ., , APPROX: 35,500 5.f..l~.I ;,. ''-' // i ...-.......- ~ ~'V ¢;-'" 0- ~ VALLCO DRAKE DRIVE EXISTING BLOCK WALL 463.53' < .. SETBACKFROMfRQPERIY.lJNJ RECREATION ROOM ./1 1600S.F., , LANDSCApED PERMEABLE FIRE ACCESS LANE r"'~' ~ I COVERED WALK , ì- 8UILDJNG D RE$IDEJffiAl'2 STORYI L 1.i<<<.APPRmC17000SFj.<:.. .. f ':'1 1".... ,', .."' ........,..;................. .-. ...:- ...........-.-....,--......_' l.IMITOFRÃiSœ:-- ...... -'n ÞODIUMLANDSCAPwlo COURTYARD .. '~4 AREA:APPROX.10,OOO$F ,_, .. '....1 -- ;"",.~......"':' -""":.:....:.:.:..:.:...,........- 'i~'~>...·. CONDOM N UMS AT CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ¡4S,¡S' , " fš g "i ~ SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LlNE@ 1 r:- .~, : :.1 '"" , 81 ¡¡¡¡ -""'I _______ J'Ib~ ;".;..., ............- - - tl . II 1_ ~ ........-....,....... .."....,..-...' ~r-'\, -,>:..01... "t-."t,'t' o'r'fl'" NORWJCH AVENUE " i3 t " ffi <; ~ t EXISTiNG ROAD t I EXISTINGBLOCKWALL) tu -. .. -R,:. .- ...:...- .',.:. -. 408.52' ------~ ~ r;;_.J "\ . 20'..(j" . COVERED WALK, ~ I $""'! ~. ;;,;.. ¡,:,"'j ;ø:, ~ t~?~ -. ~ =- 'J~gI4R1~§',,·~,RE~!pp~mµSTTRWJ :j".!",','.'..".~PHBQX,';2Q,300 .$.[""""""""";""') I ...... -'--'¡";'-';'--,---,'-'; - "-""-",.... UMIT OfRAjSED PODIUM LANDSCAPED COURTYARD AREA:APPROK28,~OO$f I ¡ r--- I ~!.JlgÞ~~A $jp~Ì''D~H~?T9"Y ABPRO¡.{'¡33,OOO'SI 160' COMMON OPEN AREA APPROX, +/-4000S.f., ~_..~'~ DAYCARE CENTER APPROX.40ÖO SF 1WS h_C'C'R PJ)j.c)j[,ALlINf'0"'M~11C'11 UJII1NIHX' hEREiN is ~~,E,M",'r,,,:\' TH, INH'~M."Ti";kFf!,:).'{jW 'Dr" k!~,H";.'¡'.Aê,&H,J ['8"''.o\II'EO FRC'M S('U'KEE1~(.), W¡- :ÆD.., ¡"E,If.t<U' ""JI'.:'V"'''c "\f þ¿,S',iMi' ¡,:e, f:E':TOU,S'0!;.i''' CÇ,¡': ,"·s.c,COJI',P,(,'\, Nl 8Ulc[;¡w;:., TUm,'TSAj'['_T>i,_ U,:E"S~h'N,'n" ",,''::,PI,AN 'Me, 'Ci-'..\QG[C'jC,';'G11--'EDESiC;"PH:<T2;:': I I "': I I I t fcc"~ I I I - ~ I I I) ~, ~~' ,','" " ":'1 L \, " ¡ ~<,:,;j_:.;../ I I , , I j j I \ r, \ I , I \ ¡ Ot.20'11 PlAYGRCUND AREA APPROx'S,OOOS,f. , I f 20 \ , \ \ , \ , I , I I , I , ¡ I, I I I , , , , \ '\ \\ n , 1\ 1\ II II 'I :j 1_ ~ fiRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ~ GATES WITH KNOX BOX 81KEPATH r···· S~~~~E . ~\II j =~ ~ , ~- 20'FRONT - SETBACK - NEW STREET - - - IMPROVEMENT LAYOUT . EXISTING ROADTO BERE-DIRECTED CENTER OF EXISTING ROAD I I I 80' I I J CENYtROF EXISTING ROAD I I I I, , '" \ \ ¡ f 1 ~'mm____1 ¡ PROPOSE~_ ..11 ¡ RESTAURANZ__V j , o 20'FRONT SETBACK SCALE .-=--...--=. , , , -¡ s , , , , , , , --; , , , , , , " -" , ¿ , , , , , , t, , Perkowitz + Ruth AR ç H j TEC T ¡ ---, I , DRAKE DRIVE NORWICH AVENUE ~ ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ " " ill I I I 1t '" ",. )f! ~ Q " g ~ '"' , ,"' w > æ c w g " I ,-- -- -- .. .- ..:. .. -- · I FIRE TRUCK ACCESSIBLE LANE RESIDENTIAL MOVING VAN & DEUVERY Circulat , , , , , , , . , , . , o \ , I l .L--~ ''',..'"'~- .' ,:~..;.> -~~~ , I I I " ...-~~ .1 ' " 1\' , , , , , , , , , , , I 1t' Jii LTì \ ¡"/ .", :J.J ~¡...,.../ \ I - i , I i I \ ".,' ~ ! I K "" I I I " I i I ',,,: ,"' "" , 11 "," , " ". " I , 1"- I ) \ .,) I I , 1 i , \ j ¡ , , #* / I I · · · II II I' II II I . I , " .~ _,e' II II i ~ I I I I , , I / I / 'I L, '/ /, " , J/ I .,.....: :'\. , \ I J J I , J I J J I ¡ -,=- SCALE! " " ." ',' , JÖßNO. 03-283,1] LA>JDh,1AFK' : ',,"O'-)"'-'!'T!YS': .Ü(l,:L,. t_, )\.iAi:-1AGEM.ENT , '1!11IJ!' , \/allw¡%I1ÎonÞary 21 HC~è Wdf<· R"o(i, $!Jli~ :W:iD. s'¡pd~", ,f.A VALLCO UMS AT CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA N CONDOM ":'''FRV'¡['o' ''-$SU'~-E 1"'_' IS "'LN, V,,~L. 60 Tti'S· fl.c,,;," f'lm (')·iLKl 1r-F0RMr,T:Ot< VfJ)"NE['NUiE"·; "··FFEU\''''.o;;--,.- THt ,',C');:'>-'1."1 0j TH:SHg,¡ 1.0: fiT" U6"CAi~Tu ,P,)\j U>l";-CES T"q \'''i' ¡:i~l-' ;'õ.\.A?Œ H::\W¿'\-rF ',0,[, i'fS·;;'O"ë.:t;Ul',f0Fi n'i:·,~c.C.l",o,çy hl ~-JH,!I·i0,'~. ÎE~f,\Eg;[,'lirv~~·$p,~·~i-nw:-; Vile CHANC'C.D:JPI''''W_t!:Æ.,,¡%r-Rt)Ct.SS 1 '80 40 20' 0' ARt . DATE 01,D3,()6 "",,14 "'s þ 11) , , , c , , , , ,,, , , ,'0 '" , , " l' ;.<: ."" ", , 2 . , Perkowib:+Ruth ARCHITECT 0' 20' 40' 80' Né'TE ïHS snE :1."NPJ['~lL ~,COI'MA,O'1 C.(;I·~1l',"Œ["C;Ë"EI" !c,¡:'I".i'LUHJ,;f,"wt .",'.sU)~[ IX· ~,E:ò"...)r;" H,~ n:SA'TU"A::V.'.'HIC" ",~s,t'tn. ':)~"A"ŒJ::' rr<'M ~ClfF(Ü,' THAT y,~' tÆ,ËM tEU;,,'Œ H('\"/ô.\J.tF. THE hfQRII"·,1'Of';·HiO'i¡G:DH[f:.¡:,,~ '~'¡;~ET['~; C,¡..q CPOM 'W';'P'':',';:'" "'it) ¡:c: 8..il'.C.-¡ -C CHbi,t'ËAS 'Ni: "F'>~E~¡;' {.F" Tt;~ [E¿;:t;," t,EV~i,"'~fH1 'I , ;;, ~/ EXISTING l'REES AND BRANCHES TO BE REMOVED ¡NTHIS AREA EXISTING TREES AND BRANCHES TO REMAIN THIS AREA Tree Removal s N DRAKE DRIVE . -;/ ~. ~ " ~/ / _0/ ý~/ : ,.'" ~ ~//''' /# ..---c..-".----- /"//;/'..... -~~-=-~~~._'-"_. / ="\\~~ "" /C/' __..-=_"""",-=='='- "3 ~ - ~.;¿:;...ç/ _-o;::;:-~~." .._~ ,'- '" .' c~--- . // ,," ~ ",,' """ ,p/ ~ ." ",,= ,,/-C" ,,// "'" ,,,,,,/" "ø vc.-=''' =~~ , ' - - --' -- - -' , ,~_ - ,_ N-'" ý<--~-- '.':' ~ ~-~~~ / ,/¿;\ ,/ç~"1:,~ / . . /;/;;;--- ::.... ~>--.-- ,/ ......-.. .:;0,-'/ .\' /// / /7' :.,......... /./ :.......L:~..._.._' > ........ ,//' :/. '-"''''''- '/ ."/ .... <1" /",,~,-,:--~~:- ,;. '. '''~ " / "ç/,""'/ ,. ." ....,.. ,-' / / /'" \'~\' ;" fr t· .' i/ -/ /' j/ ,/ .if· li f I' ;{ f .1/ I' I if , " ii i ¡¡C' ~\ \ \\\ ""I' 'I ..\\,\., .j '(' \ ' .\ ' \ :' \ \, " ,r , , I o (~" " - o . TREES III _.... 453.53' .. ... . -,,- .. . .' . ." . -- III .. .. .." III .-.-.- . .. I. ",II' ..Q " .. III . O---"-~-~-- . . ~"/,,,,,~/' -' ,-<" -- _, \1 \///,../" ../ o _\y -"<~., C~ .r~_ CJ-/ """ "'~~'~ --'~,,,,,-.: '-.""...,.~ '''''-~''' ~, "~"""'....""\:". \, '.. ~-....... .--.,'..,... '-'. ~ "- " :"', -,...... "", ".: "."- i' - .......... '., '.' /'4 i ''--.,'' "-, "':"'\" " ~~"" "'" "'\ . .'.~ ~ \ -, ...., , 1".' ,\'. ',\\\~ \--... "i·\ ':,\. '.. .. \" .\ \ , .., ' ",'\ \ \\\ :'.,', \\~--a \\ .,------, \ .... ., 1'·--- ;\ '''''''1 \ "i., I \ , I I , I I , , , , , , , ( r~40 (f)~ " ~ "~~~ '--." ~.""""~--,-._"-_. .- '~~ ':'C..----....,. "~<;::,.::-___ ::;', '-:'-----, --'., ----.::;; :'" ~~ -=--_.._.~.~-,.-_-,--.- o !!é ð iii ~ '5 ~ j;.j..'-,- ?" EXISTING DENSE _.- -- .' . r""""v:) ( , rv . ®.. ....J P-- .. .. . . :;:f· ~l· . . ...""'.---'- . . , , o ~,...._-,~_._-~-~-~_._-----.- ,--Í XI ii, .;;, ife/; / jÍ ,/ 1 ' /0. ·1'"'' ¡,.j ¡ :'-' j / f / i.¿ (f) , , , \ , , . l ~,<1 (" ,,?¡ !( I ¡ o -- .. III :. ..... '" if, , /' / " /' , i \ " , \, \. !!é ¡¡ I; ~ ffi " '-'.- . III:· ..... " '-i, c..,-'" q i..../ o " ~ c o @; ·n .." '.' .\.j -" u -.- -- -.- .. III 111·111·........ EXISTINGpENSETRI ~ /' :/ ~"-.. ( ...---.-. NORWICH AVENUE l 08.52- '-'-" . -,- -.'--: .. .... .... ... ...... I" EXI5'TÍNG DEN~ ~ .rY ,,~ .- I , V· ~ ...J .j , ! t .~,~=-"~, 1~, .~ I -l~ I~ :) i tL._L. ',J .,! . , .. /T~', ¡'.~ \- I "-..1.,,/ ~"" ~ '\ ~~,.:'\ ,__. L) / , iO ~":'4-"'" i-~' c..../ , EXISTING SITE SURVEY ..---,-".- \ , , , I , , I ;:C.;:M" Ii (j II v i _J , ,,- NEW STREET 1MPROVEMENT LAYOUT SCALE: c- , , , " , J08NO. 03..Z88,F DATE 01-0:H)6 L"TH ""'- ,,[u'LA"Lt\rtr,,' '''1'I'~'''-''''~I''<:'~' "- L" -"C.I:1\.I. r~_, MAJ-.,]AGE,MENT ""-'" Vz1;œi'zshior.Pz1: Wf·r. Ro~¿, :;",. ~où, çl.'P~nj"", ç~ ;:,,;ù·," NIUMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA CONDOM ",,",n 160' ..J ,. , , ":', i' " , , , ,/. llH2;<!.¡",lh F " ;j h".' , , , " '" :en -," , " ~'. , , :,)(' , , , , ,"C' " " , \' , ,.' ; ,',. -,',' f ......, ",' , " þ , " . ',; , ô . ,'': , " ,,~ v....' .......',,,. ,.'j , (.-, ....., .. .'." . !' ,,' , " , , F , , ¡, c , Perkowin+Ruth ARCHITECT L" GREEN SPACE LANDSCAPE KEY .. EXISTING TREES . 't LARGE SHADE TREES ¡- SMALL SHADE TREES ., TREES H~ POTTED B!NS !!III LARGE FLOWER!NG SHRUBS ~ SMALL PLANTS .. SHRUBS ¡;à?:0'~V) GRASS AREAl GROUND COVER ",',.",,/,'" -'+.,_..'"..~ CONCRETE COLOR WALK PRIVATE YARDS TO BE lANDSCAPE BYOVV1\!ER Landscape Plan SHEET 05 Li\}·n-'\lJ,RK ,I""'i,.!j.\¡f,, " , F)()PFD"'-P;;"'-' )0ENO. "h_,~",d,¡_~ :r/éJ'1/>',GEM.SNT ,03-jE8,17 "IfÆI' , V;Jlic6 F$shl()~p;;rj;, DATE ,1Q~2¡ I'¡orln Wo~o RO"C, $"%6 :mD, ÇWPfrti~~, Ch SôD" OHe~;)i5 ARCHiTECTS GARDEN SHADE WATER FEATURES GARDEN SHADE-...... ELEMENT r'~- GRASS & PLANTS . ElEMENT I i' JNRAISEDBINS , , , ì "" ì .. .. -¡ ~ .'-0 "--"", .",. % I i ------- , ì - L , ! ...--- , '-, ì '\;' /' ~ ...--- .. .. .. ;;-. , '. ,.,' '" ,- , ' "70' " \ // . . '/ .''- ,- / /,,, ' '. ' " * ~ /J ..'-, , /- ' / 0 I I l I " ",,/~ I ''0,'' ",.--,"' "-:.,,:,',;: }- , CO N 0 0 M I N U M S AT VA L LCO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ðRTREATED tONŒETEWAlK I I I . . I --~--_. II II !I II II I I I j , ; ./ , , , 6(J ,ii'S HC')!' PL."ti f.N:·,t,U M'0RMi<T,C'h' CüWAINW hEPEN 'f:, ~~"'ll,"I{-'P'( THE i'~"OR¡'\~1!V-;P~')\;iDf,I ÖNTH:~ 'U-"H~,'" H'Ef< C,õc,·,r'\INEt, 1'''0'/. S)U":CES H.'·T We: ¡Æ,N f·:['ur0.Lf :!'!0'/,\:"iE": ','k; "'-SU>!!; H(; !<['¿.P0NS1Si,i,y f8P C¡'s~.cçlJr,Þ,(y,,\L' 03!,C>i"GS, lU'.4-r!SR,jt"r¡;" ,--"U,AS ::,Hc'W' U, T'K H.."""'U (:HA';C,E D')F:;1',,, '>if,U'·iG"P!<Ü(.E(;S Perkowib; + Ruth A RCHI T ,£C T , , . .~" 'v' , 80' 40' 20' 0' SCALE L_ --7 ,; :.'. .. . . .. .. .. .. .'. RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE TERRACE HALLWAY VERTICAL CIRCULATION UTJLlTY PARKING Parking Summary Lower Level: 278 stalls 40 % of 139 units =56 bicycles On Grade: 7 sta1Js Total Stalls: 285 Guest Parking: 25% of 285=72 stalls Residential Parking: 213 stalls Handicap Parking Residential: 2% of 213::: 5 stalls Guest 2% of 72= 1 KEY '~~J : ¡ j··.·:·::·.·,:iO.,. - n : I I , ,; / ,; ,; / ,; ,; A / SEE SECT10NS# # f'AGE1~/ MECHANICAlROOM BICYCLE PARKING AND STORAGE STAIR ENCLOSVRE TRAsH ROOM ·$TA¡R ENCLOSURE , j i FiTi·...:.i{j a :. \<~y I ! I , i I . '. . P" I ~ .' ! . . ¡ n " " ¡¡ II I I I ¡ : i , ¡ ! ij n B I T I -- I I I I " j I H I - . I I t ~ ! ¡ ! I .'.. I ì I I I ¡ , .~ ¡ " .. .. L " ¡ ;,: . ......:-- · I MECHANICAL ROOM · I ............ ':" ·.ISTAIR ENCLOSURE· ELEVATORVESTJßULE STAIR I ENCLOSURE I I I .. . I TRASH ROOM r I · r-- . . I , , SICYCLE PARKING AND STORAGE . . I . , Plan EB Parking Level ,; /,; .,# ~~.~ (I \ :~~1""-1 .... ... ... .. " , \.) -, ""J./ . . SCALE SHEET 06 JoaNO. {)::-2813.17 LA' }·,.1l~(). >' Þ RT"" 1.; ,Úi,'U... " fJ"""DP\T'-:<::~ ,.J0.~."·-^;r\..JL_. : 'l1 '"' ·~r'·x":,.·,,,", b_.,.,'i".l.'''''',L.~i. 1!õJ1I'" V31Iw¡;:;¡sI1ío~P~,* /,'o~" ROß6, Sd" ':;no, CUi"'.ctIiK, 'tA 95DH VALL CO UMS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA AT N CONDOM 160' H~ IW;:;~h·j?"'·' ~-. W'_,c_" _"__!>"h(;'''''~' ''''.ov"h'W'~C'''' ,.-"V';'" E',.,,\,.N-' TO ",S';<'·j;,W; .. .. '.__' ,<","-;-1)'\"(è , , , i i , i , I 80 7,,:s cLOCk ?LNiAM)i"L IW0~!"h~1C," (CNTJ,¡'iED¡-'fI-\E!1 ,S r-H'L¡WI~."FY CI' T,,¡s', Fcf.!'H.r<' 8'.''''' U~q_o,!t~E[;m¡:'M ~/)Iß:C£S ,hAT 'il£. L·SE'" r,,~,l;s,f F'~S~{"'JS$U> f')p (-'S_~CW"gy .OH['C'ILU'¡;:;S. EI,:~!,'EJ_!'I:" THE U:;¡"'{<ó C"A"'(,cUJPi",_,H=t¿~lê_HI+0Ct'S5 40 20' o TECTS AR H DATE ·(;<3,06 01 , ';0<1 -" n ,ú " , , , ;" , , , , , , ,; , '" " , , j " , , , , s Perkowib + Ruth ARCHITECT # # / PERMEABLE (HEE ACCESS LANE CºVfß~J;¡W_A\'K-' RECREATION AREA '1',.-·, A SEE SECTIONS PAGE 13 RECREATION ROOM-' , , , , .," "'. 3A , % m m, " " 3A :3A 3A "I ~¡ - - - RAiSED LANDSCAPED COURTYARD SEt LANDSCAPE PLANS 'N-O' ------- RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE TERRACE CORRJDOR VERTICAL CIRCULATION UTILITY PRIVATE RECREATION CENTER PARKING STORAGE FJRE COMMAND ROOM RESIDENTIAL , , CA1WAlK KEY ;.~.-.-." !; , , ."' , - LAUTOMÀTED LIFT .'_'Y..y ... , , , , , , , , ...' 2A , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .~";= ..- ... .- -- -- .. -- - f> \ B · - , 3A .11 3Ä :ìr' 1:1: 3AI ',,", .... 3A . cr' "J' ¡m"? 3 " " 3A '" " SECURED FIRE DEPTSERVICEACCESS WITH KNOX BOX 3 3A 3A 3A ..j , I . 1A 2A r:z± $j ,~ "-"'. · · I " , I iJ '~STAIR ENCLOSURE o 2A L'STAIRENcLOSURE RAISEDLANDSCA,PED (OURWARD SEE lANDSCAPEPLANS ",12'.{'- 9.MMON .oPEN SPACE: SURfACE AREADAYCARE PARKING ~ , 12Ä 2k A 2A 2A \ -1 \ ' .oJ ~__~___:_:..........]:f".l ~:"J,.::Q~ lA <\:S'..(J" ~TRYI 'THE CONDOS , /PLAYGROUND : AREA FOR !DAYCARE .>",. , - \ ~-' '-'-- -.--J , , . , · · I I' I' I I ! I I I I , )~ i - I I I I 'I 1// r' /' iil It I , " \ I I J ! J I I I PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRANCE AND EXIT ,=~---- GARDEN ELEMENTS AT ENTRY 5EE lANDSCAPE PLANS FIRE COMMAND STATION ',. CB BUILDING KEY PLAN First Level Plan SHEET 07 ~~ /. >-'. .;¡ .'~. , ' , ,..1 " \1 ì 160'~~/ SCAlEI , i I I J08NO. 03·28$,17 DATE 01-03-00. ~ . Ä 'h'T~, i }']'K r,~L,)'\o.U1 '\.. j,-'''''--''-''b¡~'''~''''-'-' j"., " .", ',,~ . ""/J ";>.Ü".._.,,.. M..\}'if~(,t,ML¡-.;1 -- FÆ!" , V3Iiwf~$t1i()r.Pmt.: Wd~ R,,,d, s"~~ 21JJO, CUp^.~¡r,"_ (;A %(:j, UMS AT CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA VALL CO , N I CONDOM 80 40 20' o 'iHFI,,c('¡¡W,T'C;NFI(cYi[;Ei> hCN,:¿\T;;'V.t AS3UMf Nr, ,;~(;\"",Y\,f<'SPLN!WtL 1F,,,, ,,¡,;;o>' !'~R, 'V'[''-.L NFOR'A',,'iCh CON1A;',ËC HF<EN 1S f"ecEcMHf",- (,1;1 HIS· PUd, HA-:. 8[:,'" C,f,c.1N·;·['0 ,10m,' s:,IjF(XS 1>,.".1' '.\f.. DEn; F'i'lFBl( ¡¡~~T(>","S;LiT" f')f' IT-;S-' "ç.CVWc:y ,üCL P'. '.Dm;s, E\N,TU,:i:' '''~. ',J"!,\,,, C-'i"!',Æ[.u"nN':·7"Eë¿D(,"¡~RJCES" , ')~1nl';Mh , , # # / # # / # # / # '# , , , , , 3A j , , .., , , '¡:OVEREDWALK ~. , , , -..-..,. ..--.-- 'f _,.r-"--- /' -..-.-.-.. / r··-··-· ....,.,....",. ,/ , . "''''''-''5' c,"',,,""',_ ~ ! BAt v.'........ , é.. I t£~ ¡ [~.. , hv i &; co...' ',' it:' , r·J . .. , 1<&/ "?~> I ' . , L.- , , , i , -" , , '" .. , , , , , , , h , , , , .. , , , , , , " , t· , Perkowitz + Ruth ARÇH 'fEtT I -. .. :. .. .- .. .. . . .:. Second Level Plan SHEET 08 ). +t. CHiTtelS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE TERRACE HALLWAY VERTICAL CIRCULATION UTILITY PARKING E9 t , t:a Y:HÓ> ."""-........... JØ KEY '.........--.-,STAIR ENCLOSURE LOW TRASH CHUTE Pi isrÀIR ENCLOSURE . . I , I . . , I I' jVPPE8ijL;~~~n~JB~LOW I "0>",,4 ;1 j ~ # :.->. *" / ~ /~ ~ ~ .... .- :... STAIR ENCLOSURE .. '.y. STAIR I ENCLOSURE· I I I I I I - I I 2A I 2A I I I r--.J I I I ru . . I I TRASH CHUTE" liT') ,~' / , . ..., , ~ ~ / .,.# STAIR ENCLOSURE . I I . , > , , I I SCALE kit JOB NO. iJ3·288,í7 I ¡¡"T'¡'¡'¡'K7 £;. ~"-,.< "'.."" .: -"'01"O"¡:'"T",'kt;: .. ..'-,'.,__>.-'."....'_0 ?"{ANAGDAFNT "'0-" , wllroFa$nlQJ1P;¡rI; c",,",' DATE G.'>OG 0', " ,_..'",". ~"'_>o , --7 ~ ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ hi ()1'~¡;""I\Wof"Rp";.SÚ"·::O~Ù , , , , , . CONDOM N UMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA -..,., f\ ¿,'''''.., ,C:(: " "c,'::' , q. c· , 160 THS; n (":'-": HN.' N·;:' ~,Ll. !'If or,^~io¡ 101, C.OT-iiA!¡-)EÜ ;-i"H' I'·J is "'«H ",;<,.0;0-,' 'f',t. ".f('FI.\-\" U¡i ¡'R,y,'IDEe, c," THS· hiN f'~.s2f.Eèi ·~'B.O.1AIJiED"RC-'-< C,C,,-'F·(.Ëf.lh"-J \"1: E-Er,< RHV{',.S HTt,~"iS-R 'N" f.."".WI/.E ¡.;(, PC.S",·,:"·;c'.1)IUTY f C": IT'S,",Cn)~-",çy ,,"-L '''L'~WK'', 1[";,''-1'';; ."!Jr:, "I <'- U"-f;"i·"5 S,-<UNi< (;I., T,.;'[. "'tN, i','Ll (:¡'--";,SE [;Ln;·;\"'.' )\jE ÜESj"I~ ""·çcr:,," 80' 40 20 o , , -;' , '.'~ , " , , , , Perkowitz + Ruth ARtHITE,CT I I .... ... .... .... .·w ... . .. ... ... ... .. .:. . . .. .. .:. r [ [ RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE TERRACE HALLWAY VERTICAL CIRCULATION UTILITY PARKING KEY j , ~ I"Yi\:'¡;zr, '.......:."'1 .,/,.:<.::.." STAJR ENCLOSURE \ !.:::......,. j;,g¡¡:'t!' '2,., S€€R6ÒFrLÂN STAIR ENCLOSURE 4' /4' ::i·.·....:.··:..:...:.:i .- 4' / .- PRIVATE TERRACE > 2A [ riÄ ìtA ¡;;........ ¡OPEN 'TO ISELÖWJ >o.. 1A 1A J r I l r- r }r::N 2A'·:':'::',.·,:,:', 2A .- .- / STAIR ENCLOSURE STAIR ENCLOSURE · · · · .J · · · · - · · · · ru . I I . I I . .. ',: EB r"-"- j"- i '-"-"-"-"-' ..-..-..--.-. . 'i;2\i1 . ·-··~7 ¡ s;ýJ ./ . ~ ; ,. ~:.:< .... .... , bÅ :,,/ ! ;¡ç0! .-' I> ;;\1/ :¢Jii r.:J .. / ' I ~y " ,<0' : .,"'¿'/ ~r -.... I rd Leve . I Th /"1""'.'<.. /1 \ , "j- \. I j ''>.., :¡ j ~ SCALE JOB NO. 03<238,17 Lr¡'!"" "'K h."~';Ji'/U4.J:< [n"'''-'--r;'''i'': .. ,'hlA'U{l.iL::s \AAt0AGEk-lENT ,., !1i!!f"- Va:IcOF¡¡$hkmp;;rt; Wdfo .Ro~d: Sui¡" .\03ù.CW~":hO. çA. ~5v\. VALLCO N UM CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA AT s CONDOM 160 THS ëLGU,P','^",O¡þ,OU. :f-,!'GHH¡;)"iJ+n,M"ED ",,,,'['1'., 's f"':ELMI·'N'·,' '¡H,: I\E','MÞT!Yi "'f;-,'\'1:ÆC', "f<T'i!;.f-V8 I"A', Pi:TN :'fATi'·mfDf'<)f.~ sç,uve.'~ WF) \'if'. OEEM hn,J.'-KE ;-'ê'\"ó\'i'F w;; K·SU/{' ¡¡:, FC",ë',:,K'F,LiTY FO"' ¡"f,·.".CLU'i"A:'" .''':,f [<JU"IJ;<" ',CoHFfA';L,'THt '-'cc".f'SD;Ç;'~.N ç,,-",y:'V~~ V_'ll (,"ß1,Ç,1' DUP<{'í"\': UESIC,lj "F1XEi'[; ....7 4' .- / .- .- / 4' .- / .- .- / .- .- 80' 40' 20' o ARCH! DAn ~OJ.DG ;) ','i ~2:' Noctl i·' )0 " , , ',', , , .. , , "'^- , , D, , , , r',,, , " , , ';- " r " , , Perkowitz + Ruth ARC HI T ,ft T --7 . . / . . / . . / . . / . #c .. .. .- .. .. - . r-- .. .. .. .. -. . . .. I I I I - I I I ~ ...., JET:: I ymu I <2+ ',"""" k '.-, "/,,.. i;#Bi *1~£ I I ø ~ I MECHANiCAL UNITS: ~ I ""MECHANICAL I UNITS MECHANICAL UNITS ~.All MECHANJCAL EQUIPMENTWIlL BE NO HIGHERTHt>.N ADJACENT PARAPET HEIGHTS ANDSCfìEENED FROM VIEW ATALl POINTS AT GRADE AND ON PODiUM . . . . ~ I KEY - ,_J RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE TERRACE HALLWAY - VERTICAL CIRCULATION UTIUTY PARKING I"""""""""""'" r"-' -..-..-..-- , I " i í I I ('"..J , !~ "'V0- I . ,?£ æ ' ",' .~'/ >----- , , BUILDING KEY PLAN Roof Level Plan J A>JDMARY SHEET 10 ~. '>wjpnr"F(; .. "'- JOB NO. .t"-,,,,"_d,\,._ ¡d)i.N:'\GElvjEN"T 03-288...17 'B WkDFashionPa1: DATE 01'3!'cr1h\'.'cir.Ro"(tS~1~~03D,C~p"('ir". r;;AtS;j¿ 01·03·06 ARCHiTECTS , , , , MECHANICAL VNlTS CONDOM N UMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA , , , ' ..'''' {- I;; , , ',(' #c / It . / #c #c . . , A~' , '~I'''''' í ," r-"~ \ .. f-'C"":J \,L/ ;f'F:HI.~",:,!"f'RO"DE[' 'té-:\,¡Y',Vi:,"S,_')!~fI1C Ç'''\^iC'' FV"~ \'.1ll . /. 160' .,..# ,H'" 'L(o(V FLi"j M'DN, ¡OiFÖf:I,:.;T'Oh" çç,lnr-:"<fT,H¿Rf'" I>. r-Ff(I,;:;i';ÄFY ',1-" D",r'"IS H_Ali HJ;S litE!,: (,E,I·)'AI!·,óc),r,OM ~OU~çE.S rhi.,r WE i:1Cr:M ','r",L'-5U'. H:' Fr'$"'';'<$'81,'''Y"Œ '!-S';,CC.Uk't,C-Y .on B'Ac''''S,', ,U'-"17SN,ID"WE '-""';_"."",'-1' <~HNj(,t 'UJ,_1"iG Wi; P~S!ViPóT;;:n;~ J , I . Perkowitz+Rulh ARC HITECT ru 80' I I 40' I . I , . I 20' 0' SCAlË . . '{. t , ---- , '<' (. - i;~ =¡ ,-;1 , , , , .., , , ,I , , i , µ " , , , , , 'I' ,". ";1 ':1 " ,,8;'1 ! , , ! ." , , , . , , "c' e,/' - ~, ::?-'--. "::s;> , " 11 _c' ,," , ,," --" , - ~"::,.,,, , , , , BEDROOM SHEET 11 J08NO, æ·7.8F,17 DATE 01-02<10- ARCHITECTS 950 SF SECOND AND THIRD LEVELS - , ". , .~~~-, , , ," , 2 BEDROOM UNIT 2D (TYP) , , ". ,_., . , ,"^, ·W" " " u , i - , , , , , UNIT lB (TYP) , 1 BEDROOM -67$ SF I i UNIT lA (TYP) 1 BEDROOM -675 SF - FIRSTFLOOR LEVEL ; UNIT 2C (TYP) 2 BEDROOM - 950 SF FIRST FLOOR LEVEL UNIT PLANS - 1&2 L -\TßFFK /t'U.'--",_'- '. "'Tn"ER'lr' '-'~,A"" .,. :-..'> H;h'A"':c¡r-¡cT''' ,"~>_\. L,,-yx d '-"ft"'" , , Velirot'ashIQl1P¡;rl; ~o~n N~~" Ilk!!, 1-«)M.Sui!' 2D,,~.œþ';rjM",(;Ä_ %,,1, ",f'.: !",'C- ," , , FIRST FLOOR LEVEL 9$0 SF 2 BEDROOM' UNIT2A (TYP) SCALE , , . VALL CO , u UNIT 2B (TYP) - 2 BEDROOM - 950 SF UM CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA AT , 5 N , , .. ,) N " , , CONDOM .:,' , r , " " , , , ..1', '" " ,,- ., , , 20' Th!S FW('f.' Fun .":'i[1 "'- L ')~r'("H<!-""'0N Ü"'il'ANfD HEF-Ci, '5. "';ocE, ';f/N",~'" ~F" 11,:")""/,,,,)':[,,, F","!'~E(" 'Yj n-R"'..."," ;~~,t; r;¡B-; ('8"T"XJ,T;'~'CI<! SOL'1>:"" THi,ï "-'Ë r:;':EM":EL!"iM' !1C,'.'If."C.P w, ~.sS:!_"Æ ue' riEPC,"'SIE<tI'Yi'Uf" F'SACÜ;<\~':;Y ~LL Ë~"LD!~K;S, -nõ!''-$'''SNiD'H£ :)SE$Af;Sh'~Y,,, i)t' ",'S c'-"f' \'.!l.L CHJ<'C'i:CURI"(·TH[¡:;E:S:C'~-"FÇC:bS Perkowitz+ Ruth ARCHITECT . , " , 10' 5 2.5 0' ~m_~_'~. __..LIY ~ í , ~ ,~, I I , , I , 3 BEDROOM TOWNHOUSE SHEET 12 ARCHITECTS UNiT PLANS UNIT 3A, TOWNHOUSE - SECOND FLOOR LEVEL ~. , I , ...._.__....~..~,~-,,-,,~,-,_.._..._._------'- UNIT 3A, TOWNHOUSE, FIRST FLOOR LEVEL 1550SF , í ~ JOB NO. 03-288,17 DATE -i)::>0C en )),;)',~ " LA;';DMARK' ;', V",)p;:¡:nT,":<:; "'"' ''"-''''''-'''''' },'i;\.NAGE1v'iENT , ''E!Jf'" \j¡¡!icoFashi(Y.ìP2rX ~:, r,¡pMr, \V~!'.. Ro;"n;~;.I,. 2œD _ cupoi:ho " - , , VALLCO , ;., C:' , N UMS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA AT , , , , i.' , , I CONDOM , i v. , , , },,; , , , D , SCALE: __ 0' 2.5' 5 10' 20' TH:'" hOC": h.fWÞM'.".u. ItifC'RMATIOU ,:Ç~',O_HTi'Ef':P, 'S PRc·t#I,,;'¡:."'- ·1H[ IHfUNM'Jli "RC,"'IX[' 01" 1',,,;)-,,-"1,- H",o GeEI'; 0Gi':¡f.N;D fFC"f SYJFCES 1'1"_"\,<,[ cn,H r;U){',Œ .H-y'Y¡:"EP '\~.t.sSUH" ',c l'E.sr<",S'3IUFCOF: T'"','cç;.!f'_~'''{ >-':,1. ?l""CW,",'., T¡',,-^WSf.!,;:-:TI'[ U.St.SN,:SW.CV."' 01' "HE~¡j'N 'i,,'c\, ·r.h~r-.'é'EtH':NGTHff;[,S':"'f';")C.[% Perkowitz+Ruth A R C H ¡ T E C ; , ::: iCY')' , " , t:,SfINGÆS![}m11Al , ~ , , 1, 'x!' 1 L. 'i-:~'-'/__. _ _,~!¡)£:0J <j j j , , i , :!'S·"1.'1M(¡( t----1 , i , i i _.-...~,,~. , I' , !' "/~ ~. "~' ' , ,,~,~ ; "'> " I__i -.,..-~ , , -'-.. WFW$ ; -,-", , ""''''- ,lZ i5Hf1 A1HR[l~.N( , i I i " , I "'T.0.1< -,-_.., : ·220",ú"max 3rdHR $I 'lW'{);~"---- $0- 'Ii- ndFLR !!>".{» , 1st T79"·ú" ~l:w;;ìn 167"·' , t LATITUDINAL SITE SECTION B lðncl"",¡"" ¡¡..,n", , EB Site Section SHEET 13 JOB NO. :03-265Î7 DATE 01-Q3.()6 AR.CH1TECTS iliLYjÆ 175';0" .-- --'Ã7 -'/ /~ Roof 199';.0': "'---'-"77 ',__,'_ ~Æ_:~ , ,,~,.,," ^"'=>¿:p;GX0?2;P.'='",.,TI.... , -) 7Q":J):'" ,," , ._..~~""'Ä" ,,',';'Þ=ß%~- ' , _._.--="'4Þ;:;: ~,,---0 :¿~p" .--. .._.,-,._,,_.._,.£ Ck "ÖÙ~, LA-"'"-)"i^¡+~i' -.".:';1. j.</.I~._,,~ EŒTRTlES- H n." ~-.¡-, "-'''''i' YJJ\n"U,"V,L/v ,!1j!!r ' ValicoF^a:;hooP¡)!'k Wo!f"R,,¡¡~_$LL1',2P~_Ç"þe;j¡r.o CONDOM N UMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LONGITUDINAL SITE SECTION A .. -'-.... .... --,,- --....--- .. .. .. .. ' .. ' .. ' .... .. ' .- '" -.. , - o ~" . - ¡ ill ill ill I' I ~""~..~._._,_._----'-.-.~" '''=Ç,'''''''TT'''-"A0~~A,~''''',v··,,7T'''~·,,9=-''''~'''''r-'þ'??,''M'''''"'"<>"'""T','''',,~,,''''''''-=+'';--¡i~O-,S,'',''',''',,','''',,.,'·?)iw""""<"¡S:" ,^%Þ.'''0V!''''iM0W/h/Y4ß/ÞÄ£",Ù%'':i!!:!&'i;Z::<L\\,!à,'''''''''-'''ß00xnz-/s/,v,,"..",'0.'/:J,YÚ"'''&W/Ä'Y+.'"''kfC,>:0.L+:13A''-'!i2,-h. I ' . I , H'''''''''~,;î;~';~¿r;w;~'~~-;:,~ I I I ~ Perime!e<Road TO.f'. 220'..{)"max 31rlRJt 1'99'-,0" 1iJ '4' i:4: ~.ö" '" , 15' P.¡Mf\g(,õtage SCALE { ,. 60 ."H'~·nC<H" FliJ'A'<DAL it,r'(,m,<A-¡!CU ())Im.ji-if;') HfPUli ¡i· "I1::U],{%'.<;"i TI"[ Iwoe".',,'¡':;)' r'C:CVI'XD ':JH THS h~I" ,Y,S [<[EN (;f-".'Þ>~m not;\-, S-0UFC,,~: 1hn ','Æ: œ':'1 F"U~[XF. -¡«i.'kVI''': wë ^.S:';uw' hC ¡·B:.PCN$·!S1:n" F'ß' CI"·ACC"IRt·.C\' A.l.SU"UNé<JfH,,"''': 0,"1)1H[ '.'H>J,,",.SW'W-' C'''TH'Sf-1.A!''~'·^'I_ U'''''6'(i:'.'?:¡'>0"'E[·n.IG·kPRCTfGi':- 3D' O' I , ¡:q::i10n Perkowit% + Ruth ARCHITECT I I , , ",' , , " .; , c' , , < , :;¿ , ;~ .. , , .; , " , , s .__.,,~ I , +22IY-0" -----,-----,,- ----~ HOOF PARAPET MAXIMUM HEIGHT +199'·0" . .. -, - -,- --- -----------~ THIRD LEVEL +189'·0" 'l; ..--. SECOND LEVEL 4179'·0" 'l; /FIRSTlÈVEL' .. , .._~/ 175'·0" " ,,-----'I' GROUND LEVEL I' X,"""""':""':"::' 'M""'·.':'r"" "~'__~~..J_ EB '._.._00'7 j"-"-"-"-"-"- /' .: .' / -..-..-..-..-..-.. /., ,"-" .' .. / ¡ / ¡ (1)"...' ¡ ! r··J I' , / ~.. . : . '\.00'~ / ¡ '~. .. . ~. m.. ,~"'_'_....~m...~~"_m~..~_'m'~'_' m........mmmm.....n..............m........mmn_n_________..mu..mn..._mm_..._ -J,.. ~ ::~'^:::,\;:~, ~75'"'' ... ..".".'""__ ¡ ·V -----C¡ROVNO LEVEL -m-~_:;f:_ +220'-0" ROOF PARAPET MAXIMUM HEIGHT +1B9'·0" -~--~ SECOND LEVEL +199'·0" --~." TH!RDLEVEL +179'-0" /FIRSTLEVEL , .. SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING A ENTRANCE ELEVATION (j) Q) , t BUILDING KEY PLAN , A Building SHEET Elevation- SCALE: 4 1 J08NO. 03-28817 Ù~ly~B~L\§K .'","";-':'.<.111..,,, ~MÞ,NAG£)¡.Œl·IT U' \f¡¡lIæF2ShìQ0PaIi¡ ¡'"""' w6;(" RM~,$~'I..2DôO, (:uJo¡!b VALLCO AT N UMS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA CONDOM 40' TH.c. elCn": f'¡.ftNAt,eKL 1'~fOR'U'""Jr·' cunt·.!!j!'.t:'H;;H~!N ':0 ,'R~L¡¡C:"W', THE ;hFC'f·'M',"<.'I·¡ Pf;'C'\'iCÆ't' ':",·Th¡~f-'IJ·N I'i< SFÐ' 0\'''')A~C:> H,<"" Sf!ê'C¡'"· 1";"'.1' \'>f' U,oF'''' P!'Lt'-.SLE HHÆ.\'E" ',c.-o: ."",.S'.."Œ ",C> ~'l'.S~'Y·'S'8Iln'i<'f: F'$ACf.Uf.;'.n I..H f<¡'U;'~';<', 1Tk"i~,S'Aq[,"JHf; ,_,;;:s"-,, 'h-".\\, ç" ':1<': 'UN W O-j,,-%,Ei)U"I"('YHEC'ESH,,'FGCESS 20 0' 1 ü' DATE 0':-0>\)6 "C"" ¡;:. ¡). , , , ARC , $(", c' --" 101,;, , , , , , (' , . , c , , ''', , , ^' , t" , " , Vi , " , " 5 Perkowitz + Ruth ARC¡"¡-lTEtr SEE BUILDING C +220'-0" ,'> ROOF PARAP~"-''-0 MAXIMUM HEIGHT ~ ~ +199'~O" THIRD LEVEL +189'-0" ~.~" $ECONDLEVEL +179'·0" 'FIRSTl£VEL .._.~, ~.__.J75'·O" ..~ GROUND LEVEL EAST ELEVATION BUILDING B Q) '\ , SEE BUILDING B } < ; EAST ELEVATION BUILDING C ® ..-..-'---.-'.-..-"-..-.', /'/ ~/;/' EB .._.._.._.._u_.._.._..:r , BUILDING KEY PLAN dings B,C SHE' 15 iI Bu Elevations- SCALE: j - ¿T J08NO. 0;:>288,17 t:: '''T' ""L. ,:> DATE D:H!6 01 1" CO,SOt Ll\~i:~2t:!J"ÔJ~K , n'·"".,',ci" 1r", MANAGEMENT ~., \/¡)ilw1"ashlonParx !·i~rth WQ1~ Ro?4,S~¡¡' zo:\ù_Cuþ"tih VALL CO AT N UMS CUPERTINO, C FORNIA I AL CONDOM 40' TCiS Fl.C{;R PiJ!1 "'NC' Al.ll'i'(,F:i-IÄ1IV·) C."~"ÄI"ED H¿"of'» '" f·T,'SUh\IWS·Y· 1 HE ·"i''',)kM.''.T,':'!' '-'H/.',r;,,[) ("!·i "i<;O'U'N M~,ó (;1::'" ('b',1j·.I'ÆD FF'A,< 0~'l!r,(."G THAT ùt. [,i'D,' FE!. "BLE 1',,0;,"\,1<,: 'N; ""·:,,uML ,·,c, ~.'Ei;.;<,!,·~I,'c.i'" F':+: ""'.~.U::ljr.j'·::,' .",-, Gl'Il[-,I'<',~ "",',",,",""·;.0'L' T>i[U~¿:'Þ:os"C,',:-'N ,y, 'HiÕ·H,"" \'~:.l CC;",,"":-EC"'Fi'J·:; 'HE ,Æ&I:,Hi't'(:Ciõc'S 20' 10' :0' ,', , :10'.2;) , , , , , , c , , , ;: !; c " " , v 11 , s Perkowitz+ Ruth ARC HI TECT , ________,±2Q5~oO::_,,~'''''0 MAXHTOFPARAPET ~ +18~·-O':·~'~""'0 SECOND lEVEL ~ +179'·U' :rfIRsTLEVEl "....4!: 175'·0" GROUNO"ÙVEl '~ ~ , +' I" , MAX HT OF PARAPfTil'> +179'·0" FIRST lEVEL 175'·0" " GROUNDLEV~ 189'-0" ECONDlE\'El EB Elevations- Typical Buildings E & D SHEET 16 ..J ARCHITECTS l' -..-..-..-'.-,':7 .-"-"ò'" ,/' '2' r" .' .._.~_.._.. ~®/ .._..- v .. r"- /' . .' j , i i , ! ! r..;J ! A. I~' . .v L..;..- BUILDING KEY PLAN JOBNQ, 03·288,17 DATE 03·06 1 o LANDJvtARK PROPER,lES MANAGFJviENT ----- -~ vailcoFilShlonPaf!: ',10fz:;Nortl\\lkI>~RQðd,su;re'203c,cup.rtir"',(;I\$5C\4 ''',7D);':7'' b'-'90 i',;:gö' ¡.~ ,",r'" Co' , ",', ."',, 1 .. co , , (, , "".. -~ " ?0 , . , I , , . ¡ . CD WEST ELEVATION BUILDING D CONDOMINIUMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA >;<!'¡ '3 ;:':n U(G bt<c (,i\ /02 20:; "":e' ¿is 'J\! ;(),; ( ,'f" .. ,," ''); (' '~ . @ WEST ELEVATION BUILDING E i ; -i ® ELEVATION RECREATION BUILDING AREA ; , SCALE: __ 0' 10' S4U:': , , x-' , , , , )6?Ó " ,J' " ,- (: ,M¿,:,~ ,",,,,,.,, ',-.,"-~ , 40' "EirH-'o;VN:orJPR,V.'OEf; HX,¡''''iRW¿l';;\öVMI:r;,) 8;~W"Çh1'N,","'lM'V,'i..¡ v:) , 6t " " ,", ~', )",- " .~ ,~" , 20' 1H"FtÜO; n_~ÞJ ,4)jDf<lL Nf(;f'1M,10N CÇN,-b,i'W¡;HS"'~-'~ IS PFEur,~:H'-"'Y Ü'lfjl",I"L"-i';H,'-.SBE!')'J')5NAI\~Df'Rl1l^Sl1'JF;çt'$1h',,1'·,¡")EEM'iELi".l<Œ RE$~ON:Õ-iS!UTY"G~' rn.oÚ;-¡iRþ.Cr ,"d K'''.DI',ê,S TE'~,"ii'S"N;:,n-£ USHi,'-S G'N-IG~,fj$~,Ç,THE¡ÆSIa-;r.-RX.fK, ' Perkowitz+Ruth AR CH J .T E· C T 1"", ,Ä , , L HEIGHT OF PARAPEi~ --~ 0'-0" GrOundlevel?- 0'·0" Groundlev~ +18'·0" MAX HEIGHfOFPARAP#- +15'-0".;-11. ,~" '~-.;7 TO,P. EAST ELEVATION , j ---------.--- r------------------ I I r- , 1 CD WEST ELEVATION o +18'·0" "', MAX-:-HEIGHT ÒFPARAP# +15'..-0" --,--,--,--~ T.O.P. .0'..0" Gro'tmd leve-I---0 +18'..'0" '" MAX, HEIGHT OF PARAPÈT-0- +15'..0" -~ ilJ T.O.P. ilJ '0'-0" GrouodLe-ve-1 j ';.' ------ ------------- __" .m" _____ __om _ PÜ1INnAlSfCGNPf!-o.ïRúffKl&5fORAQ r-- MAIN ELEVATION (NORTH) ® ¡ SOUTH ELEVATION 5 , :þ' j; ;; ¥ , , < > 8' 0) C,' , ',': E9 BUILDING KEY PLAN Daycare Center SHEET 17 Elevations- SCALE JOB NO. 03-288,17 LANDMARK 'PROPERTIES Î\{l\..;-....;AGH,lliNT ~-~' WIIcoFas:nlQnPark 1ù\nNorthWcU.Ro<ld,8wlw2Q~D,tup.1 VALLCO UM CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA AT s N CONDOM 32 THi~ ,UY)R !,,;,-"NI'.M)hL ilif'OPM.Æ'iIO" (:üNT"NËD,-¡[,REI'i IS PPEl."Œf·PY tH~ IW¡;'RJ.<A1",)I': PR0'''::)~t' ê_'HTIi,S: "LAN Hft.S 8EE~' OSgMÆC,fFOM ".0UPCË"1"PÙ~ DEEM PL.¡,'.2l.E MO'M':"iT:'F \'é;' ASC,Ui.ji;' ro 'F::tSPÇNf;,'SIUl'Y V,P rT'S ~CÇßiI·':YtH BeH,DiNGS_ 7ET'-ÞI-nS,Þ·!ÐHE'l.'SES'A':,SJi!>V_'" ê';;"",'3 PLM, ",~,\ 'U-W-iG",C0RNG7Hf:Df:~;GNPRÇÇf""Z ~"_" .J"- ,_.._.._ ".._d_ ,. .._.._.._..' n_.._..._..._ · ....-··7 i ./., · ,/' · . I )" " ì ,/ i r"J !~(j)/'/' I=~/ &2.-.,7@ 6' .' 0' DATE OH3'05 Perkowitz+ Ruth ARCHITECT ARCHITECTS ''; r.o,CA9M14 ; " , , ;:, , '8'\1'" , " ;", ',ir.: j , 2 , , .. -", '" i ", :J . 1'c c',' -" ,', 7i' , , , . .. .. v ",,' , (, , " , . , , f .. "',, i'-' , N ,«'!¿-q:' , " , . (;, I, " , ; ,"~'I; "" c"" ,-","" "¡ , , , ,'" ,.. ,'2¿' , :; Sb '-'ir,n" -""'" ",,,c', ~'JL' ~ c/~ g¡C;2( '" Ii" ~ ,;Sli'F!GG vd F "'0 ,'" ,LI' ,:~, ,,,e. , C '+1 E 17. o 17, [ W ~ ~ . ~ H , Q , [ 8P- ,. I CAL ELEVATION TYP I -;. PAINT TO MATCH "ICI''COLOR #752 "RIVERSfRC\i" "'" PAINT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR "SAGE GREEN" PAINT TO MATCH '1CI"COLOR 11$74 "CYPRESS" PAINT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR #743 "5IERRALEONE" PAINT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR #742 ·CP,ISSON GREET'¡" 8A$F INDUSTRIAL COATING 81972 BRONZE BASF INDUSTRIAL COATING 819R4 COPPER CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM Building Finishes SHEET 18 LANDMARK PR,OPE..J:1;f1ES JOB NO. Þf¡.Þ,lxAGEM,E.NT œ·288.17 , g' V1IJlcoFastJ!on?atI: DATE 10\nNortn\'JoI1l>'''~I>¿t'$wið2ù~(;,'Cup''"Þo:CA95D14 01-03-06 "n, :, i-:LÖ¿''',- i, WI"-,',' i: ARCHITECTS ~ FOG SOUTHERN LEDGE-STONE CHIC,o,GO USED CJJlTIJRËD BRICK CONDOM N UMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA t- 5>,1.' U L:; ,D ie',., ,',- ."-·'t·,,,·\,i'.-'i,\,·,H '''(\3i«,f ;r;- (,' '> ",,1:)1 <""i,t,"';"'\(; F'é,~r:~, ,dCF ,,' , FINISHES PAINT TO MATCH "lcrCOlOR #48;2 PAINT TO MATCH "ICI'COLOR "JCr'COlOR TO MATCH PAINT "JCI'COLOR #$73 p¡I,INT TO MATCH "CHALK" FAINT TO IMTCH "ICI"COLOR #817 PAINT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR #215 "ANCIENT COPPER" "¡CI"COLOR#272 PAINT TO M,ATCH "POMPEJi CLAY" PAIt·n TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR #518 "REINDEER" PAINT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR #472 "FORTRESS STONE" SSU,?40G - h,ks."C"c0/('X , " " ',,' - , (c; 7HS f'W0R PLAt,¡'¡'f;ALl 1i';'ORf.'A1X'" C()¡.iTACIEPI'EPi'i:¡'¡ '~.PRELlMI"_".;\' T',f i'l,(,",I~Þ,11V,j "'f<':)vl:n; C"·,TH!ShN' HAS Æ[J.; N;""'-".I"EC', ,1'CoM s,»~cn, 1'.'-"1 '>'Ie ¡:,"".M FHv-ELË Wh'"""EP W';:k_Sl.-'h't NÇ' RESF-'CWS!E,"'¡Y"0R "·S.~CCUR~(Y -"U B'JIUj1%S, TEH.4<TS,oJ';)T;J' Uf,ES?S9-<C,"M 0'1 THS PiArl 'NLL (:¡')W(,;¡·;¡)I.:;~IN" lfit.{')CSIGN~-;"C'iS~ (:-1 , i' .." ".. , "to !i , .- ".. , Perkowitz + Ruth AttC HI .TEC T MATERIALS EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER PROVIDE 7 LIMESTONE COATED FOAM FROF1LE SURROUND LIGHT DASH FINISH EXTERIOR CEMENT P{).STER PROVIDE 7 PAINTED METAL COPING SMOOTH STEEL TROVVEL FINISH PRE·CAST CONCRETE VENEER DRY 7 METAL TRËlLlS! AWNINGJ GRILLEV>.ORK STACKED LEDGE STONE PRE-CAST CONCRgTE PANEL, 7 ARC RAILING S'YSTEM (LIVER BRONZE CO,) BASË, OR mlM THIN BRICK VËNËËR (THICK SET MORTAR: GREEN SCREEN PRE- F!NISHED METAL PANEL (WI STANDING SEAM) E.P$, FPAM MOLDINGICORNICE! TRIM WI EXT CEMENT PLASTER ALUMINUM FRAMED GLASS STEEL CABLEI ROD BRACEJ METAL FIN I~ '" , - r~ i[ SOLID METAL FASCIA _.. ~ , , ;\ i '\ 1\ i \ I . / ,'~,.!<,.ð/~'L~_,_, II ." METAL TRELLIS! AWNING5-~ -j , RESIDENTIAL BALCONIES!~, TERRACES ITYP) , ~B -SECTION PROFILES ON THIS PAGE ~~ KEY ELEVATION ON GRADE {TYP) "SECTION PROFILES ON PREVIOUS PAGE (SHEEï 20) æ Wail Section Detail- Podium Entrance SHEET 19 ~E~'F ~ --c KEY ELEVATION ON PODIUM (TYP) ~D ~ ~A \ , " , , , ADDITIONAL COURTYARD -'~', FOR SOME FIRST LEVEL UNITS PAVED PEDESTRIAN WALK~ ; , , ¡ , ! / , , , , , ! BAY WINDOWS WI OPERABLE"-- UPPER SIDE LIGHTS (TYP) EXTERIOR DECORATIVE METAL PANEL LOWER SIDELIGHT ~ RAISED PLANTER BEDS ",." ,\,::-,/ ,,:~"/)j'./ \~\iI/~_ -_, .:*":\ ~r~\<t.~H::, /" '''''''~ .." :,..,.,.,...~~ \"-1, ..,-......,.. '-'·'..>/Aí>:i: .'j,..-" ! ! , >S- \)1 ~ \ '. DECORATIVE LIGHTING / FIXTURES , :./ I , ! ! j i ! , , I , , I /' / , INDIVUAL UNIT ENTRANCE~, "PORCHES" ' \. [ .;,L\ _, ~ ... .." .. .. .... ,- ;,\~~RAISED PL~NTER BEDS ~"" ,,-, ·""'1. -, ,_ .. >.,,,,'} ",'" :1 _ ~ ., ",: ,'" 'U c·,.:,-,.,_. ",':.,.'..,." _, " ~ '. .. " __ '.i_, .. .>;"'-', f., ..: 'Î."-" ""f""""-"'" ,."j"c '~;¿:,~¥'¡'i\ ,1-~\t:IV't' b; J< .1 ..........<.....,".~........ '~~'lt..!"t<·I\"·,~", J.. .< Ii ·Y':,r,·'\''-\t,¡1,, '.,; """"'!H'! "';~NW!'w,,;-- -8'-0" ; ~,~,~""~,----",~,,,,,,,,,,~,~,-~, PARKING LEVEL ...,;: J:= , '.~ 38'-0"- 40'-0" -$ ~,~ , . PARAPETlEVEL " 37'-0" -$ RooTLEVEC ~, '.24'-0" ~HIRD LEVEC- ~ 14'-0" -$~ SECOND LEVEL 4'~0' ~ -~._-~-. FIRST LEVEL 0'-0" ~ GROUND LEVEL ~ , TYPICAL TERRACE ON PODIUM SCALE T$ ARCHIYEC JOE NO, 03':<';;'617 DATE 0,-03-06 LÜ.J')VI"K FL. .L ,. ,,,"'1.1\ .'·,·.tnnp¡;·¡YI",r'.;;; . .¡K",_""~,."",,, l.f""'M~"q'-",! ,hi '" ~"~\.A~¡d"'_h " I?ÆJI \f;¡liwfusMlonPa'k W~lfo Rt'¿,S·u!",20oD,Ç~;o~'!.i"c 16' T-I'l' "l.C'·::W,· H."-."N·¡[f.Ll :WCWM."T!O¡': ÇcO','TMFD 1'[','''''" is H':ElAi,,;,"RY '¡Hr: i'i"(.'RllPi%FR(''-'0:OT. {;', 1'H'>- Fv\-' MAS HEr·' or:\'1:',II-'[[' ~F0'" 'X'l.:F¿S 'VA1 \W f),,~M REUABl" Ì"é'\'k\'E!" ,\E' ,~~UMf, iK" PtS>'C<-i(':8V¡V i<,¡;' T[;t,G'u~1·n :-1i_ ",:,I:,.¡:"~GS. TSh'AN'~; ~h'D ,HE USESAS SH:YMi ,-;'1'; TH!~. PLNi \"'1\ ;>-;,oJ~0E [,i).e·"·>i' ,H1' UTIG~ PC:'X~·SS· , ! ¡ ¡ I , , , ! , I ,,-,-,., '-,,"A' ":>"- B~ TYPICAL BAY WINDOW ON PODIUM CONDOMINIUMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 8 2 O' 0,2501G Nonh DTn . , , , .. , , ( (' , ',,'-' , ! , ;: , " ~. , , , , , , . ;.. , ,,, -1 " ;-- c j~,' r; , ',0; , Perkowlb::+ Ruth ARCHiTE-tr l~ - SOLID METAL FASCIA ~ METAL TRELLIS! AWNINGS - - 38'-0"-40'-0" $ PARAPEfi:EVEC - PLASTERED WINDOW fRAME PLANTER SILL BINS ITYP) ,- PLANTER BEDS WITH LUSH VEGETATION ;- METAL TRELLIS , , , , 'I:JClf;;; II-ll i , / m Ii J L , METAL OVERHANG! AWNING ITYP) PLANTER BEDS WITH LUSH VEGETATION ,'-' , 'I -,-~-- BAY WINDOWS W! OPERABLE SIDE LIGHTS ITYP) \ \ , , , - EXTERIOR DECORATIVE METAL PANEL LOWER SIDELIGHT ITYP) - PLANTER BEDS WJTH LUSH VEGETATION , , , , , J , ,:.:::.~ . ;n'1" , , kG /~" ,*, ~-- ;xu 4ft?; 4:4 <i'0 $"yf ~'% , , I , ( , , , , , I RESIDENTIAL BALCONIES! TERRACES ITYP) NDIVUAL UNIT ENTRY ¡- PLANTER BEDS WITH ! CLIMBING fAUNA , STOOPS , , , ,- , ! , , i , , i ¡ / ¡ , / , , ,,/ ",; --.--Ji~ -, Ii 1,1' ", (;!) /1 11. 1'1 -,-' -'I' 1': ~ ,,; ! ~ , , 1 I I I; ,ql't" I' ini'! ;I.,C. /;" ".." "j ,<-,- 'II' ",-,.j i::;:1 Hi;- ''ii:; ii I (- I! , 37'-0" ......ROðFlEVEl----- " A'-O" -$I' flRSTLEVEL ,,',0'_0" __ ~ROUND LEVEL -$1-8'-0" '" ' PARKING LEVEL 1 ÇECOND LEVEL ~24'-O" $ THIRD LEVEL 4'-0 , ; j' , E- TYPICAL WINDOW PROFILE ON GRADE' D- TYPICAL BAY WINDOW ON GRADE' c- TYPICAL TERRACE ON GRADE' SCALE ...J s JOB NO 0:;>25517 DATE 0:>06 TECT ARCH f D LNm~'1ARI .. - ~-v~m""_,·,-' ~ , ~'h0r·j<.I.'. '"', \(4N,("';>O'1/"':"(:" _ '-'" ,/'. '_M .t!~ , '1m!! VðilçbF3ffi!0riPark Wúil~RO$d_2·Uil";;ç;;.Q_cwþ."ic",U.Z({)1' , CONDOM N UMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA "'CC":f.;ëT .>.c'2,.'IJfW. :2·I'U'J·!'.~1·.L 16' hfG nc,ç'¡; "',NI i'XD/.t, :N"ÚRMAT'Ch ,~.("j¡H'EÜceEfUr·' " Ff;'"¡",,,<.;'py ,,.t H,lfê,O'òi',,T1 DI' T>%hl-!~ Wi, EEn ('8A1'A1',f[' r¡;'Dr,\ S:)'ÆCU,THe 1'If.. êf'Ü< H_LI"BŒ )",'W/i;",',,¡o: ',,\~. H'.S:."V'SW".'1Y ,.)¡;- ¡""k.CC.UR,".C\' ."'-1. 8..'iL::Ir'c« "U''':'''SA'~",''k''_ c-~ES",S'8-':(N," ,')" 1 I-! ,:,<Þj{(_é' ['UET"C, ''if':::'E'.GPF''i(:ct".[, ! , I , j i i Fe TYPiCAL WINDOW PROFILE ON GRADE' ;-'SEE SHEET 19 FOR LOCATIQN Wall Section Detaìl- On Grade Entrance SHEET 20 8 4 2 o 2:;N"Mt , , . , )' ,- ~ , , , , ',~, , , . f; , ':;' ;: , , , , " " , to , Perkowit::+Ruth A OR C HITE <:1 ,-_. >;~1'-:::"- . ?,.-. ~C'-.. ~. _/0; //:-:--.---,:~-".._ /'- . ~ ~"- ....~..,;--~. ---~,- ~;;~;,,--,:-./.., '----..-.~>""'---->- // ",.- "~ '----..-~ . . ---:?-.- >~/- ..~-- ~-". - /,:/ .- -----. ~-= -".~~,~- »" '.-/ . ''-': __~::c:/ _,/ '----..~ '-.2_...' ---' --- ~- ~.'- . <::;C/. .'_ '----..-. ~--'"-.---.. '.' .'/;::- ..----- '~~--- ~ --/. .,,<--~,- /¿/ .;-/' 'c-. ''''","'~ -,--;--" -- ~~ "~ ¿;--..../.-/ ---, :~~/""'. ~---., ~ ~'~-----. ~- '/-- '.-----'."'- ¡iì i ¡¡ ¡ 1 '=-=' EXISTING SINGLE fAMILY HOMES INE OF WALL ~ I I I I I I I I , I ~ I I I I j ¡ , \, , \ \ \ r , 11 " 'I , n 'L W·"=.';;=:;::--·';l , ¡ , .'" ' 'C' . i¡ I, .'.." II I :i .1, f " 'i~_J.. j- ,=e",=-~J II'=-~-; I : I I Ii'! i~~_J I , , ~ , I I , I I , , \ FIRE LANE ~?Er.;:Œ:~t.'L'·7 / ./ ,// 8 Fire Lane SHEET 21 on at Secti -..---.-..-..-..-..- I Enlarged Typica -40'-0") VARIES 120'-0' I I fl I I , I , I LINE OF WALL 16'-o"IMIN) EXIST, TREES !\ PLANTS ,-~,~._- VARIES 120'-0" 26'-0") '~__"'_~'__.m _ ...___._,~,_,_.__. WALKWAYI FIRE LANE --- CLERESTORY WINDOWS EXTERIOR DECORATIVE - METAL PANEL SIDELIGHT PLANTER AREA ~ COVERED WALKWAY TURF BLOCK MATERIAL- ) AT FIRE DEPARTMENT , , ACCESS LANE \ , ( , , , I , , , , ( i I I , 6ì TOP OF PARAPET '28'-0'- 30'-0" 10'-0'" .i€\ SECOND LEVEL \~14'-0" 10'--0 ..J€' ...ROOF LEVEL \J-24'--û" -'_._'-~'~--,--- !,¡__¡,J , (' ¡ 1 I i , , , ¡ I ' I : ; i , , , , , , I L (PODIUM) ~FIRST LEVEL \ 4 -;::0'-;---""'" , , I 4'-0 g'-O' .., (;ROUND LEVEL -¡:TO'--o" PARKING LEVEL ."_.._---,,, 08'-0" SCALE: -; f ARC JOB NO. 03·25617 DATE --03-06 'f] 1 = '¡')I , ,,].- I1.i''<l .Vd";.i<. ,.' . '",,,,,,,,,-,,>,,,,,,,,,,[:-<;.-' ,'S.I,Ji;:;", J._^, Ml-\.I:0AGEMENT '''.-_....---'~-'''-''''-'' VaÎ;çoFa>hÎonPark N01i"W"I"'RoM,t""oZ(\30,CLiþ.¡j¡tp,C~.'9;¢j4 " ,',' D~ ;,2 , , , ''', , i ;, VALL CO , , , , AT >.; IUMS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA >'( " N , ? CONDOM , .. " . ,,; , -',- .CC.'" , 4' 8' THié. V,-,,c'R fj,r.¡,· ¡.jj[:;0.i. ;f"0FM;"1'~,r" CQ"'iAI"fDHU:f.:!': ¡c,0'Ti,!r"lw·)è\' ·1Ht ¡'<'·'(T.:M.".'!',W ppn,i:ÆD OL'TH3 hH' H"-" ~ü'-" ,'E',~"!',i',EL' ';;q,< WIJFU'& T,Y·T ,\\0 ('iT" "'fUt·,BLE' \--'C.'\,,·:ò:"(iF ','.': ,"';;'s!,,'.'-Io ¡X, FESr-'(NS'(i~F'-FC,~ '1'SA(:C.URI·CY ;'LI 2'- r,,¡'<"GF, EI-!Nrcc'þ,!':L,';'>;" ¡/,tS~SS"ÇN,'" CH-'>',,,Pi,¡'¡" \~H CH"N,;,t [:UF'I'", ThE Œ,"L'~ !-'f;',)USS , , , 16' /C_' ",-,,'- ,,"" s Perkowitz + Ruth A RC H ·lTEC T 2 o , , , Facade I ve of Typic a . I Perspect , ! --" SHEET 22 ARCH TECTS ! J08 NO 03-28fU7 DATE 01<03-06 L "-""".1<.:- /L"JLlV1I'cr\ , ·¡Y¡"~p)"r-!jS:. "h,j,._...! _~_ '1""0'·'(;':1,<1",""-- ." "·"~.'j;_~.,,v..,.{ '...U'" VøllroFasflkmv-.,¡k Woió\ R~"".';¡* "ù3(_. (:"p~';i'-'o.CÞ, %ü,<I \'- , 0înno'lh , , " , "' ". , , :" , , CONDOM N UMS AT VALLCO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ",'if' ;: :·'C c: V"q V ¡-, C , ;:, ';(, , , " , ër:'II-if(H!,'AiV",j-'i'cC""Ü¡:l' j'.)"",',TP \\(NS3,~S ~'o HèW,'-, C,,,n-Æ PL,N-' ',W..l '"v , , '+i"· FLV)R PlN' Mi';'."'-' i"';f'U;'M."J'ui'-'C"T.".''',c~r~ü'', 'i;-I'PEc;'#<'Þ,R', ü: TH¡SFL;o.Ji HÁé [;:TN ("'ÂI,,!:-JËL' pr,,'M 8:"'~Çf:'1H.",' v,<¿ [H}~ 1':i'i.l'D'o Ff.:S1<+;SIf,tl'" ."0,·, "'&_~ÇC.lWf..c" ÞH B'_",,!:'h;,$, tJ>",''''SNm THE 'Y'ESAS UWK_f: c.~J'·!W, 1H ÜE::::"'-~ 1"':S'é.t'GS , Perkowitz+ Ruth A JtC HI T); CT WINTER SUMMER "---'-7 // / " E9 I Shadow Studies SHEET 23 VIEW L,>W'JPK !" .Jh'i \:\ '.PiK)PEKTlES .. JOB NO Ü'·;·-"·-''''},,F01·''[ ,11",~KlJb.J;"" 0:;;.26817 '11'3i!~ . ,~ V3iiWr-ast!o"p;¡rt DATE '18 i n ¡,¡dn Wolro Rood. ~,!W 280. ÇWi'~"i"". CA ~,'O',~ 01·03-06 , , ARCHiTECTS , , _J 4:00 PM 4:00 PM , " , 12:00 PM 12:00 PM CONDOMINIUMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ,-,-,-,',,- , ii ;"co,-, '.-,,- ".n_ -,'--'.-'" 9:00 AM , 9:00 AM , , , -', " , ", , , 1'i:~, 1'1,8';';;,' P,-".H ~N[) f1.L ¡",;)~;MA:¡':)H -::C,',T,AI';l:t, cH;pt'N 1~ H·,~I. ;'1H''''~''i ,,-,if; "'F(,q,i.'..T'.()'; ;"'':;''''c'tD (,]j ',,:O'PIN, 0V.K-[<,; éc[,O,TM-'E[; ':F'('>~ S:'U":CE., lH,'-' "W; ¡'Efl~ FŒ,C"""',U: ',+1-)w(','[r, ",f.kôSU'.I[ Nc' "iEs-,[,t",jflFYO()f" C(;A(:I)ß';AÇY Hl E'UL:.;''/'~'' 'f'~<."WSM'[,) ?Hf U,;!;,:z."S"H"-,-,-, ,y, Hi:S "-U·;; We:. C;-{'-3KF1>P"K' rHE rÆ",I(,1JPiO'OCE,,2, "',' , ~", Ç/.,' , Perkowitz+ Ruth ARCH fTEt T c"· 'c· mages SHEET 24 i Source JOB NO 03·2&8.17 DATE 0':-03-06 l!p~Hºl:ð,Ô.EK . ;<;..)i"Lh..J):::;> !,!J;]'.]/ir..3EMH·ìT '!1;11!'" . Va.IiCDFa'hlonÞ¡¡rk '~O~"' Wotfe RN~_.su¡l" '20,,0, CUi'.~ir"'_ CA. S""~14 VALLCO AT CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA UMS N CONDOM ~h¡" f!.X"·, "".~;'NiC,r·L I!'F-:>I~)-.!Al IC'\' ':'JirM1H:'HcRD,j 1'3 F~Ü,'Wr'!I,~\ H~ IfFC::HÜT':::-,',:· '1>:,\-,Dt''[' 'XiTI·;¡',F,A\ ¡,'!.,S f,t',}, ¡'2A.TNjt'[,H'CM ;-;CUF'ç¿S TVA1 ''''Iõ (·'é'[i.M E¡'cV'BL,f ;--!(""\{"~F \'1;', ;CS'3UMLHÜ :-"",PU;¡':I~IL "",' '<'R r-'S ~.CC!.ß:~,C'- Þ'-L E,;. H"~(.S, '1~.'·';;W" ",~",]>OF >';-:;-Ð".-·AS ',~(N"1' Ü\ '1,<1:; h.m W-i.' CHN'«'[ UJR.kò 7Ht r::E~:ç.u r-'2cçb~ ARCH 1ü'::' ,,;; .. . .~ " i ,. .. , .. , , , , , .. , <- , , .. cr,,' ·,u, . , P. , ;", '",) <>: , Perkowitz+ Ruth ARCHJT£.CT L " 'c,' , ! ,,' Materials & Color Board SH EET 2S Lf\ ,,TD\' A RK :,'.3." l'U"\. ' -., pjiOPE.P::rJ:E.S JOB NO. ;'P'¡''''cue''T . ,\-!-ow·,d.U·A,...i\ 0,,>2('.617 "" 1E,!!'" \/;¡l!roFa£M\onPark DATE ~~ j:ii2ôNorth Welto Ro~::I, Sw;* 20i,U, r"¡.-"!:..,,,, CA <';:,;)1-\ 01·03·06 ;.,...,-, "., 'J'YJ ARCH! IE C T S- ."'." PA1NT TO MATCH "1CI"COLOR#752 "RIVERBIRCW PA1NT TO MATCH 'lCI"COLOR #l!.OO "$AGEGREËW PAINT TO W""TCH "ICI"COLQRm¡74 "CYPRESS" f¥,INT TO MATCH "ICI"'COLOR #743 "SIERRA LEONE" FP.lNT TO MATCH '1CI"COLOR #742 "CAISSON GREEN"' 8ASF iNDUSTRIAL COATII~G Bi8ì2 BRONZE BASF 1NDUSTHiAL tOATiNG 8191'4 COPPER CLEAR At-WDIZEDALUMII'¡UM FOG SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE CHICAGO USED CULTURED BRICK - - <7¿ ..-...,.,. "-,¡ ,'. MATERIALS FINISHES EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER PROVIDE UMËSTONE COATED FOAM PROFILE SURROUND PAINT TO MATCH "¡CI"COLOR #4ß2 LIGHT DASH FINISH .EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER PROVIDE PAINTED METAL COPII.", PAINT .TO MATCM "!CI"COLOR V"OOTH STEEL TROVJEL F¡r,ISH PRE·CAST CONCRETE VENEËR DRYMFTAl TRELLlSI AW\i!NGI GRILLEVVORK PA1NT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR STACKED LEDGE STONE PRË·CAST CONCRETE PANEL ARC RAILlI'¡G SYSTEM (UVER 8RONZË CO.} PÞ,INT TO MATCH "1CI"COLOR #$73 .&.SE.ORTRIM Trl[l~ BRICK VENEER (THICK SETMORTAR¡PAINT TO MATCH ''lCI':COLOR #817"CFALK" GREEN SCREEN ;::: PAINT TO M"TCH "ICI"COLOR #215 ><:"ANCIENTCOPPER" PRE· FINISHED METAL PANEL _ PA1NT TO MATCH "ICI"COLOR #277. (lVI STANDING SEAM) k "POh~PEII CLW" EP.S.FPAMMOLDINGICORr.ICEJ '" FAlm TüMATCH "1CI"COLOR #61ß TR¡MWIEXTCEMENTPlß,STER X: "REII'¡DEER" "-.-..:::. ALUMINUM FRAMED GLASS 7'C .ÞAlhIT TO MATCH ''iCt'"t"";OLOR. #477. / . ;/ "fORTRESS STONE" 3> STEEL CABLE! ROD BRACEI METALFW - -- CONDOMINIUMS AT VALL CO CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ;;, ) 1 ?;~',() ~ .'~ ;; ;~ >" (\ Ie , , f.'¡C'C!"; ".'iiA;i~'hL II,r(Rt,'.~~'C¡,; C('N7"-NEt;,hTH·.N ,¡; PF~¡."i%'.r'Y ,He >F'C.%'J/f:U,' r·'."·,:)VDêC' U,'"[j"S HNi h."$ SEEN (,¡)A.:r,.1>E[¡ F'r:O.JM s,c,l:PCES 1'1'.'·." \W; DeEM Re,-,"'.Ece .MO'/Æ:VU: V,( .'..%l.'hH'.IK ;·¡;:srÜi,:BIUoy ".j;;' 1''S''-CCi-''':~CY .''-L BU;C¡YNGS, TeN.".,·i'·s,'M;-;-H"'. "'%..\"",<)""" ('" T'i'c'HM' we¡ (.H"-'-!(-EI\,IRI-iC· 'Hf; ['Ë·c''':;''¡-'P0Cc~~. l'- , , , Perkowitz+Ruth ARCHITECT , ) , E IBIT E E t Q., ¡f Jo /0(, January 30, 2006 To: Cupertino City Council From: Richard Ho, M.D., MBA Tel 408-828-0189, emaiI address: prkho@aolcom Re: Vallco Shopping Center ('.0000 Development- positive su.,pport position I am a resident and homeowner of Cupertino at 10438 Flora Vista Ave. As most of yon, I would like to see Vallco surpass Valley Fair and bring us quality shopping and entertainment, in addition to the tax income the city can receive. I had not paid much attention to the Vallco development until yesterday when I read the news in Mercury News about the condo project. I would like to support the project because we need more dwellings to accommodate the demand and the developer needs this project to make Vallco a success. The reason I am writing this letter is to Íl!Ìect my profussional opinion regarding comments made by some of our fellow residents on the Mercury News article, that the condo project would sigroificAly increase the student population. These residents raised questions about the cbiIdren-per-bousebold formula used in the sebooI-impact analysis. They claimed that renters of the condo's in Cupertino are fiuniIies with children. I would personally dispute this claim. I am a real estate agent speciali~ in sa1es and property management at Montebello Center (the corner of Stevens Creek and De Anza). This presents an important case study of the issue concerned fur future ...-£"......... Current1y I am managing 7 units there. I don't know jfit is a coincidence or not, all tenants of these 7 units are without children fur the past 18 months since Montebello' s inception. I sha1l be glad to provide the tenants' names and telephone numbers for you to verifY after I seek their approval Moreover, I receive several calls a week from prospective renters, and most of them are without children. The renters are mostly professionals such as engineers, physicians and teachers who work in or close to Cupertino. They are excellent citizens of Cupertino. So as a profussional, I can conclude that the claims ftom these residents disputing the sehool-impact analysis are without base and are wrong. I believe a VaIlco Condo Project will bring prosperity without burden to our sehool system. ¡13Cì!Of/ .tt-1 1/ 30/06 Meeting Regarding Vallco Project. Please distribute to City Council Members We, as concerned Cupertino residents, address the city council at this time to voice our concerns of the important vote of the Vallco condominium project. We look forward to the long awaited renovation of Vall co Shopping Mall and support the developer's vision of a mixed use plan as is prevalent in today's upscale centers. The proposed plan of 137 condominiums will make the renovation financially viable and also make it possible to draw the top quality stores as tenants. Right now, with a long history of failure and low consumer traffic, we believe Vallco needs this mixed use plan to succeed. We believe that a Yes vote for the project to be approved is by far in the best interest of the large majority of Cupertino Residents. The tax revenue benefit and chance to have Vallco become a place with great upscale shops and entertainment and a place we can be proud of are some of the obvious reasons. A No vote puts at risk, if not kills our hopes of Vall co Shopping Mall finally transforming from its long history failure. In a recent State of the City address, Mayor Lowenthal spoke of the great way Cupertino is a leader in the State in so many ways: Education, Technology, and efficiency of government. It is obvious that Cupertino has a unique and talented group that run this city. The mayor also talked about Cupertino's unique partnership with business as a progressive Win/Win relationship. This is probably the most unique way that Cupertino can be a leader, when the prevailing relationship of Government and business in our State is adversarial. It is always an easy political choice to side against business and let them defend their rights. Although this is the common practice in government, our city has the ability to do better and make decisions based on the merits of a project for the city benefit. It is proven that the greatest benefit to both parties comes from the Win/Win relationship in any endeavor. The business partner also has to be of the character to work on the Win/Win terms and be looking out for the interest of the city as well as profitability. Cupertino's city officials and the local developers of Vall co uniquely qualiry for this progressive type of relationship of Win/Win. The local developer's vision of the future of Vall co Mall comes from a desire to better the City, not only to make a profit. There are far safer, easier, and more profitable projects that they could have taken advantage of if money were the only motivation. It is unbelievably unfair to characterize them or treat them as greedy developers looking to take advantage of the City and leave. This type of dialogue and attitude is what makes most Business /Government relationships a Lose/Lose. The true experts have analyzed the repercussions: The city planners, the school districts School- Impact Analysis. Let's use facts for our discussion and decisions and not descend to political rhetoric. The vote tonight is critical. It will, we believe, make or break the projects success. It will also send a message to business of whether Cupertino is willing to be a partner with business in the future. If not a partner now, when confro!lted with this Great opportunity for the City, when will it be? A copy of the Signatures and names of residents that believe these things strongly will follow prior to tonight's meeting. Thank you for your consideration, Concerned Cupertino Residents U> 1 hoJDl, =ÞfL( Grace Schmidt From: Aki Honda Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:51 PM To: Grace Schmidt Subject: FW: Condos at Vallco -----Original Message----- From: Kiersa Witt On Behalf Of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, January 30, 20064:33 PM To: Aki Honda Subject: FW: Condos at Vallco -----Original Message----- From: Brkezzat@aol.com [mailto:Brkezzat@aol.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:10 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Cc: schen246@yahoo.com Subject: Condos at Vallco Dear Sir: It seems that ever since the anti-growth measures were defeated there has been a concerted effort to pave over what little of Cupertino that remains green. I am very disturbed that there is discussion to bring down the retaining wall near Vallco so that all of the traffic will empty into my neighborhood. I chose to live in Cupertino because of the fact that it wasn't like Palo Alto- attitude or density, and every time I turn around there is some new condo project going up-usually in my side of town---- because it is less affluent. At some point the schools which have been a selling point for this community are going to deteriorate, and then developers will no longer have any interest in the city. I do not understand why there is so much interest in building condos in the city when I understand the city gets its income from sales taxes. I hope that at some point the building frenzy will come to an end since it negatively impacts the quality of life in the city, and that at some point we will get some decent high-end retail in the area instead of the mess we have at Vallco-- which appears to be nothing more than a flea market with a roof and a parking garage. Is there some reason that we cannot have a book store in Cupertino-or is there some Orwellian plan afoot? Thank you for listening to my concems, Brooke Ezzat 1/30/2006 1/301ó~ ffi Kimberly Smith From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Stephanie Schaaf [sas@alumnLbrown.edu] Saturday, January 28, 2006 3: 18 PM Richard Lowenthal; Patrick Kwok; Dolly Sandoval; Orrin Mahoney; Kris Wang City Clerk Sierra Club support for smart redevelopment near Vallce Attachments: Sierra Club letter ~ CupertinoCoundlLet ter.doc (51... Dear Mayor Lowenthal and Council Members: Attached please find a letter of support from the Sierra Club regarding development near the Vallco shopping center. I am also including the text of the letter below. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Stephanie Schaaf Vice Chair, Sustainable Land Use Committee Sierra Club, Lorna Prieta Chapter Day: 408-539-2136 Evening: 650-342-0674 Dear Mayor Lowenthal and Council Members: The Sierra Club recently learned that the City Council is considering development near Vallco Shopping Center. While we have not taken a position at this time regarding specific development proposals for this site, the area appears to present an ideal opportunity to plan for smart re-use of underused land in our urban core. AS you are aware, land-use decisions have a tremendous impact on community and environmental. quality. Infill development, preferably mixed-use with residential serving commercial, provides an essential strategy for reducing sprawl and creating rich pedestrian-friendly communities. The jobs/housing imbalance throughout the peninsula generates tremendous pressure for poor development in distant areas such as Morgan Hill and Dublin, putting our precious open spaces and valuable agricultural lands at risk. Such poor development in turn generates automobile traffic with its concurrent air and water quality degradation. These pressures create a vicious circle with increased pressure for automobile infrastructure. By one recent study, fifty percent of the land in San Jose is allocated to automobiles in roads and parking. Furthermore, recent EPA studies have shown that good infill can reduce traffic by putting housing near jobs. We urge the Commission to encourage uses for this site that will help alleviate Cupertino's jobs/housing imbalance and create a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly neighborhood. Sincerely, Stephanie Schaaf Vice-Chair, Sustainable Land Use Committee Sierra Club, Lorna Prieta Chapter 1 SIERRA CLUB FOUNDED 1891 January 28,2006 Cupertino City Council 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Mayor Lowenthal and Council Members: The Sierra Club recently learned that the City Council is considering development near Va\lco Shopping Center. While we have not taken a position at this time regarding specific development proposals for this sit<;, the area appears to present an ideal opportunity to plan for smart re-use of underused land in our urban core. As you are aware, land-use decisions have a tremendous impact on community and environmental quality. Infi\l development, preferably mixed-use with residential serving commercial, provides an essential strategy for reducing sprawl and creating rich pedestrian-ftiendly communities. The jobs/housing imbalance throughout the peninsula generates tremendous pressure for poor development in distant areas such as Morgan Hill and Dublin, putting our precious open spaces and valuable agricultural lands at risk. Such poor development in turn generales automobile traffic with its concurrent air and water quality degradation. These pressures create a vicious circle with increased pressure for automobile infi-astructure. By one recent study, fifty percent of the land in San Jose is a\located to automobiles in roads and parking. Furthenuore, recent EP A studies have shown that good infi\l can reduce traffic by putting housing near jobs. We urge the Commission to encourage uses for this site that wi\l help a\leviale Cupertino's jobs/housing imbalance and create a mixed-use, pedestrian-ftiendly neighborhood. Sincerely, Stephanie Schaaf Vice-Chair, Sustainable Land U.e Committee Sierra Club, Loma Prieta Chapter· Lorna Prieta Chapter 3921 East Bay.hore Road Ste 204 Palo Alto, Ca. 94303 TEL: [650] 390-8411 FAX: [650] 390-8497 www.sierraclub.org/chapters/lomaprieta