Loading...
PC Summary 08-09-2011 , City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 C U P E RT I N O FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department To: Mayor and City Council Members From: Gary Chao, City Planner Date: August 10, 2011 Subj: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS MADE August 9, 2011 Chapter 19.32 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for appeal of decisions made by the Planning Commission 1. A�plication EXC-2011-08, INT-2011-01, TR-2011-22 (EA-2011-08), Barre Barnes (WJB Canyon, LLC), Lot 167, Cordova Road Hillside Exception to allow the construction of a new, 3,704 square foot single family residence with an approximately 1,189 square foot basement on slopes greater than 30% on a vacant lot; Request for a yard interpretation to interpret Cordova Road, instead of San Juan Road, as the front yard for a new single family residence; Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacements of protected 25"and 32" diameter Coast Live Oak trees Action The Planning Cominission approved the application on a 4-0-1 vote. Enclosures: Planning Commission Report August 9, 2011 Planning Commission Resolution (s) 6652, 6653 and 6654 Approved Plan Set g:playinirzg/Post Hearirig/suimnary to cc080911 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 950143255 C U P E RT i N O (408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • plannulgflcupertino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 1 Agenda Date: August 9, 2011 Applications: DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-12, EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 Applicant: Mark Creedon (Byer Properties) Location: 20750 Stevens Creek Boulevard (APNs 359-08-020, 359-08-021, 359-08-022, 359-08- 006, 359-08-013) APPLICATION SUMMARY: 1. Development Permit (DP-2011-03) to allow the construction of two new retail building pads; 8,136 square feet and 5,086 square feet respectively; and demolition of an existing 4,930 square foot restaurant building for a net square footage increase of 8,292 square feet. 2. Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2011-12) for two new retail building pads and associated site improvements, including, but not limited to parking lot re-orientation, lighting, landscaping, and street frontage improvements consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan. 3. Exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan (EXC-2011-10) to allow a 26 foot front setback for a new 5,086 retail pad building where a 35 foot front setback is required. 4. Tree Removal Permit (TR-2011-30) to allow the removal and replacement of 79 trees within an existing shopping center parking lot in conjunction with the proposed new development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plannulg Commission recommend approval of the following to the City Council: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA-2011-10); 2. Development Permit (DP-2011-03); 3. Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2011-12); 4. Exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan (EXC-2011-10); and 5. Tree Removal Permit (TR-2011-30) in accordance with the model resolutions. PRO ECT DATA: General Plan Desi ation Commercial/Office/Residential S ecific Plan Heart of the Ci Crossroads Area Zonin Desi ation P Planned Develo ment Environmental Assessment Miti ated Ne ative Declaration EA-2011-10 Lot Size (5 arcels) 236,966 s uare feet 5.44 acres Existing Shopping Center 136,590 s.f. Buildin Area Pro osed Buildin E +8,136 s.f. Pro osed Buildin F +5,086 s.f. 21 DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-02, Crossroads Shopping Center Building Pads August 9, 2011 EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 Pro osed Demolition -4,930 s.f. Total Proposed Shopping 144,882 s.f. (8,289 s.f. net) Center Buildin Area Re uire Allowed Pro osed Building E Setback Front: 35 feet from edge of curb Front: 40 feet Side: 0 feet if promoting Side: 90 feet (east) and 41.5 feet (west) pedestrian access Rear: 94 feet Building F Setback Rear:1.5 times the height of the Front: 26 feet (exception requested) building Side: 35.5 feet (east) 492 feet (west) Rear: 320 feet Buildin E Hei ht 45 feet 30 feet Buildin F Hei ht 26 feet Project Area Auto Parking 705 stalls 625 stalls (alternative parking rate ro osed Pro' ect Area Bic cle Parkin 36 Class II 37 Class II BACKGROUND: Existing Center and Surroundings The project site is situated on five (5) parcels within the Cupertino Crossroads Shopping Center (The Crossroads), located on the south side of Stevens Creek Boulevard generally between the ternvni of Bandley Drive and Saich Way. The majority of the shopping center is owned by Byer Properties, from the current Vista Eye Center to Fontana's Restaurant. The Mardesich Co. owns everything eastward to South De Anza Boulevard. Adjacent and across the street land uses include single-family residential to the south; the Bottegas Shopping Center to the north; commercial retail and restaurants to the west; and the Mardesich Co.- owned portion of the Crossroads shopping center to the east. Recent City Approvals In Apri12011, the Planning Commission approved an Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2011-02) for fa�ade, landscaping, parking lot, lighting and sidewallc enhancements including the demolition of 2,400 square feet from the rear loading area at the former Mervyn's department store site as well as a Tree Removal Permit (TR-2011-0� for the removal and replacement of 31 trees. In June 2011, the Director of Community Development approved a Tree Removal Permit (TR-2011-29) for the removal and replacement of an additional six (6) trees. Construction and demolition is currently underway to accommodate the future TJ Maxx tenant. DISCUSSION: New Buildings The proposed project consists of the core and shell construction of two new retail building pads (Building E- 8,136 square feet and Building F- 5,086 square feet) along the Stevens Creek Boulevard street frontage. The former 4,930 square foot Marie Callender's restaurant building is proposed to be demolished and replaced with Building F. The project proposes a net gain of 8,289 square feet to the center and will leave a balance of 107,190 square feet in the Heart of the City General Plan Development Allocation. The applicant is requesting an Exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan for Building F to encroach 9 feet into the required 35 foot setback from the curb. 22 DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-02, Crossroads Shopping Center Building Pads August 9, 2011 EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 Site I���ip�roz�e»�ef2ts Site improvements proposed are summarized as follows: ➢ Public sidewalk, landscaping, and street furniture enhancements along the street frontage, consistent with the Heart of City Specific Plan and similar to the Peet's Coffee/Panera Bread building on Stevens Creek Boulevard � Parking lot improvements (resurfacing, re-orientation of parking spaces, low water use landscaping, storm water facilities) to maximize parking capacity and to enhance efficiency, onsite permeability and pedestrian safety ➢ New pedestrian plaza between Building F and existing Pizza Hut building ➢ New fountain behind Building E ➢ New trash enclosures for each building ➢ Outdoor seating areas ➢ New pedestrian scale, building, and parking lot lightulg throughout the project site .. . _ ` , �� , . �, .,_ ,: i�,:�' �� � � � � � � � �,�; a �` � , �.. � � ' = �^ � � � . .. (`•�rr "� �.. � f r :, a.. � — '�' �.�. T ns r � � � � � ` .� . . r�, �. I�� �' � r f ... .. � _ �� '!� � � ti; s. � � � . .. � « . �r.�� � *.�.._—'— �h � � � �; ' �.� ,� � f_ �r�+� - ; „ ; � � � _ � � �` � �';��arf ��`A , '�'k�"�,�. �'� � '�._'�'� �.�y.� ; ` � �' � _; ,�' • �--";-`"� � � � �� � ,�,, _ _ - - _ _ _ . �- .� e . � �.'� .. '� ` � �' ,n ,u � �` � � �'� .. � �,�..n�.z� . .. �,,, .�� ,, ss _ ,..,�,,. ,..V.�.. . a .. � �"" .. .., .� . . �R_, . .. �, . . � � . � ,_ .... � . . �. ,r, .�«, ,., .. „ — .. �. � �.;� _ � , . � � � _ yi r+, i� i � _ � �. +4 +1� . as r '�, �'�Z� e.e+� . . . �. » .. . .. , � �,� � ' - ... � . . ... ,� � W . � . . r ,r - �.. � .� i. � .. . -.- � � .� +.. lln. ��ile a li ,. .,+e;�>, i ...���......�.. .TM� . . ` t.., � �� .�_ _ 4 � � �� � �� ' � 'AI! � hn . N � r � . 1„« �T � _. '. ,�l� �` t I '^�';' T . � � ' � 'fR 'a.�+ '°h. � � [31dg E ��� � ��� , � � � . � � � �,� w . � � � � _ � � �/. .e ,� � ,� , �� �'� •� �� Bl� � � �� ,� � M¢�'' • F � � , . , ��' � � � ��` ���� � `'� a �� �' � ���t �� a --- �'�4 . , , �, �; ,. � ` � � �,� ' � � _ � � � �. � � '. jC111 , I.O�B � �'� ,�* '*''� 1 �ea�+�±� � i . . .. , . � Y � , .�"'�.�„ _aa�,�" °� - . C �. � �, .�_; . �... �.,� , _ . � Parkin� Lo� A �"'� i :�t `.,�;°£�" ° I -� ,� � P , a µ �r '�' � ,� �' �` � _ _ � _�� , ��I�� ��; k�`� � �� � � � . � � . , � � �; ��: .�....r ..�.r�nr.r ai.r�e � � ± . . . , - �, e �: � �` „�,s � t � — � E • t � • , � ; ... -. x ,�,. K° �._ � _ . , . .. ._ l.. aa. � � ,» '- � w.� . �::. - _, �e a ,�� A � �' �' k ,�� � : � : � ,� �, ., t � Property line �° - ,� _t, �.,� .r ; ��� � f � � � , ;� � .� a ' . 4 '�'� � •' - i Parking lot area of work ";�; , � � , "` r, �� _ , , � . �. e *�� �� a � � � ' L , a , ' �; New buildings , ,�;°- .'��` ,:�` '� R *� �! .'� �� � � r � •�� � � ' r � , ; �±� � �.� � � ' �� Bldg demo area of work � � , " f .'.' ,� �u� ,�;;.� ; ---- ` i w ;� �� . � ,i ��* "�:,, i � �� ,`� � . '� '� '� r " F� � Public ROW area of work "� "� .� i A . �� � �I► � +� !J `� j N ..2 � � � :� ; �' �., p _, � � ��� �;�- � � `,�� �� ,� ; F .� ,�..- ; � � �.. � - . � ���, , � �� �' J � � � �� �+-.. �_ . . �t �} ; - » A � ` j �"''.� �^9.*.F ��_ �__ �� ' __�. rLL_ , __. l�r�p�sea r�reas ot �ti'ork Diagram Arcltitectural Rez�iezv The applicant has designed Building E to generally reflect the architectural theme of the Crossroads with colored ceramic tile at the bases, a combination of gable and parapet roofs, arched entries, pilasters, and a series of columns to defule the tenant spaces. Buildulg F is designed to reflect the unique style requiremealts for the tenant, Islands Restaurant, with more modern forms and buildulg materials. The colors of Buildulg E match that of the existing shopping center while Building F proposes warmer colors 23 DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-02, Crossroads Shopping Center Building Pads August 9, 2011 EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 (see Attachment 1 for the color and material sheet). Both buildings will be incorporating several green building features, including low-emissivity window glazing, cool roofs, and sun shading devices. The City's Architectural Consultant has reviewed both buildings and recommended additional architectural enhancements as illustrated in Attachment 2. As a condition of the project, the applicant is required to work with staff during the building permit phase to finalize the architectural details. In addition, the final design of the plaza between Building F and the existing Pizza Hut building shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. Heart of the City Front Setback Exception The project proposes to comply with all of the Heart of the City Specific Plan requirements, except for the proposed front yard setback for Building F. The Heart of the City Specific Plan requires a minimum 35-foot front setback to the edge of the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The applicant proposes an average of approximately 31 feet (a m;nimum setback of 26 feet) in order to create wall articulations and visual interest in the design of the building, while also maximizing the necessary retail square footage for the prospective tenant. The setback encroachment allows for a more attractive and active streetscape, similar to the frontage detail in front of the existing Peet's Coffee/Panera Bread building further west on Stevens Creek Boulevard. The City has granted similar setback exceptions in 2004 for the Peet's Coffee/ Panera Bread building and in 2007 for the new retail building at the corner of Tantau Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard (not yet constructed). In both cases, the approved building setbacks were an average of approximately 35 feet along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Given the constraints of the project site, the setback exception is necessary in order to facilitate sufficient area towards the rear of the building to maximize the parking lot layout and retain a large Oak tree in the parking lot. It should be noted that the required 26-foot landscape easement/public sidewalk area is provided by the project to ensure that the frontage sidewalk and landscaping details are consistent with the commercial district. Parking The project proposes 625 parking spaces or 4.32 spaces per 1,000 squaze feet (ks�. Comprehensively, when taking into effect the total parking for the entire shopping center, the project proposes a total of 1,029 parking spaces or a rate of 4.68 spaces per ksf. The City's Parking Ordinance requires the project to provide a total of 705 parking spaces (if assuming that all tenants in Building E would potentially be restaurant uses) at a rate of 4.88 spaces per ksf — resulting in a deficit of 80 stalls. The Ordinance provides for alternative parking considerations through a parking study prepared by a licensed traffic/parking engineer. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. was retained by the City to conduct a parking study for the project (see Attachment 3). The study provides the following conclusions about the project's parking sufficiency: • Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) manual standards, the parking provided by the project exceeds the 85� percentile parking demand for similar shopping centers (4.30 per ks�. • Using recent parking survey data in the three local shopping centers with similar tenant mixes (Homestead Square, Mariposa, and Grand Park Plaza shopping centers), the study concluded that based on the highest surveyed rate, a conservative share of restaurant space (15 % of the center), the seasonal adjustment factor, and a circulation factor of 10%, the parking provided by the project exceeds the parking survey rate of 4.20 spaces per ksf. 24 DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-02, Crossroads Shopping Center Building Pads August 9, 2011 EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 Other factors were also taken into consideration such as that additional� parking demand savings can be assumed from people combining shopping trips from one store to the other and the fact that the site is also served by a VTA bus stop with 37 Class II bicycle parking spaces. Hexagon concludes that the parking proposed by the project is adequate. Tree Removals and Replacements T'he project proposes to remove 79 trees in the two parking lots near the project areas of work. Most removals occur in Parking Lot A, near Pier 1 Imports and Building E. It should be noted that none of the trees removed are protected species. The majority of the trees in question were identified by the City's Consulting Arborist as being over-pruned and predisposed to decline a�d/ or structural defects (see Attachment 4). No trees were identified as having a high suitability for preservation, however, nine (9) will be retained onsite, including a large Oak tree to the rear of Pizza Hut. The project is required to fulfill the recommendations contained in the arborist report in order to protect and increase the longevity of the trees to be retained. In order to mitigate the trees being removed, the project proposes to plant 901ow and medium water use 24-inch box trees in the parking lot and street frontage, consistent with the replacement requirements of the Protected Tree Ordinance and landscape design concept of the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Staff supports the tree removals since they allow for a safer, more efficient pedestrian and vehicle circulation system. Further, the proposed parking lot modifications and the replacement trees will visually enhance the shopping center envirorunent. Public Outreach The applicant mailed out notices to property owners within 300 feet of the project, inviting them to attend a neighborhood meeting (see Attachment 5). On July 27, 2011, the applicant hosted the neighborhood meeting inside the Marie Callender's building. The meeting was attended by the applicant and five (5) neighbors. Comments were similar to those received at the March 28, 2011 neighborhood meeting for the TJ Maxx architectural and site approval project (see Attachment 6). Neighbors had concerns about the storage of shipping containers along the rear property line, delivery truck operations during early morning and late night hours, and glare from onsite lighting. The project has been conditioned accordingly and similarly to the TJ Maxx approval, by restricting storage of materials along the rear property line, only allowing deliveries within the hours specified by the City's Noise Ordinance, and requiring that the final lighting plan be reviewed for compliance with the lighting standards in the City's Parking Ordinance. Other Key Conditions of Approval Lot Mergers In accordance with City policy, the property owner will be required to merge two large, slender lots with the larger shopping center parcel containing Building E and the future TJ Maxx tenant. Odor Abatement Systems In accordance with City policy and to mitigate odor impacts, all new restaurants within the shopping center shall install odor abatement systems prior to occupancy. Building E Tenant Entrance In order to maintain an active street presence, future tenants in Building E will be required to have their main entrance face the street and keep their windows and doors free of obstructions. 25 DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-02, Crossroads Shopping Center Building Pads August 9, 2011 EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 Signage The applicant has provided conceptual designs for signage for illustrative purposes only. These conceptual signs are not a part of this application. A separate application for review and approval of a sign program and signage will be required for the project as a condition of approval. The sign program shall be comprehensive and provide sign criteria for the entire shopping center. Other Department/Agency Review The City's Public Works Department, Building Division, the Santa Clara County Fire Department, the Cupertino Sanitary District, and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) reviewed the project and have no objections to the project. Their pre-hearing comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval. In order to address VTA's comments, a condition has been added to require the developer enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to ensure proper maintenance of the sidewalk path near the existing bus stop. In addition, the final sidewalk paver design shall allow anchoring to adequately support the bus shelter. Intersection Mitigation While the project is not anticipated to create significant traffic impacts to the area, the level of pedestrian and vehicular activities are expected to increase at the intersection of Stevens Creek and Bandley. Consequently, the Public Works Department has conditioned the project to contribute to the improvements of the traffic signal and median at Stevens Creek and Bandley to accommodate the potential increased vehicular and pedestrian activities. The City will observe the intersection as tenants occupy the building and will apply the improvement measures accordingly. Environmental Assessment On July 21, 2011, the Environmental Review Committee recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA-2011-10, see Attachment '� for the project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project includes the following mitigation measures to reduce the potential environmental impacts of the project to less than significant levels: • Scenic Resources: Tree replacements required by the City's Protected Tree Ordinance • Objectionable Odors: Condition of Approval requirement for restaurant odor abatement systems • Water Quality and Runoff: Implementation of storm water best management practices (BMPs); construction of parking lot bio-swale; drainage provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer • Temporary Noise Levels: Construction and deliveries shall comply with the City's Noise Ordinance and noise mitigation measures recommended in a previous noise impact study conducted onsite (see Attachment 8). Prepared by: George Schroeder, Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: f sJGarX Chao /s/Aarti Shrivastava Gary Chao Aarti Shrivastava City Planner Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolutions Attachment 1: Color and material sheet . Attachment 2: Crossroads Center Pads suggestions by Cannon Design Review dated July 27, 2011 26 DP-2011-03, ASA-2011-02, Crossroads Shopping Center Building Pads August 9, 2011 EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 Attachment 3: Parking Study by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., dated August 3, 2011 Attachment 4: Arborist Report by Arbor Resources, dated July 22, 2011 Attachment 5: Applicant's invitation letter for the neighborhood meeting Attachment 6: Neighborhood meeting notes from Kahn Design Associates dated July 27, 2011 Attachxnent 7: Initial Study, Mitigation Measures, and Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA-2011-10) Attachment 8: Noise Impact and Mitigation Study by Stan Shelly, Environmental Consulting Services, dated March 24, 2011 Plan Set 27 EXC-2011-08 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6652 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A HILLSIDE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3,704 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 1,189 SQAURE FOOT BASEMENT ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 30% ON A VACANT LOT SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2011-08 (EA-2011-08) Applicant: Barre Barnes (WJB Canyon, LLC) Location: Lot 167, Cordova Rd APN#342-17-068 SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Hillside Exception, as described on Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more Public Hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support this application, and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public health and safety. 2. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 3. The proposed development has legal access to public streets and public services are available to serve the development. 4. The proposed development requires an exception, which involves the least modification of, or deviation from, the development regulations prescribed in this chapter necessary to accomplish a reasonable use of the parcel. 5. All alternative locations for development on the parcel have been considered and have been found to create greater environmental impacts than the location of the proposed development. 6. The proposed development does not consist of structures on or near known geological or environmental hazards that have been determined by expert testimony to be unsafe or hazardous to structures or persons residing therein. 7. The proposed development includes grading and drainage plans that will ensure that erosion and scarring of the hillsides caused by necessary construction of the housing site and improvements will be minimized. 8. The proposed development consists of structures incorporating designs, colors, materials, and outdoor lighting which blend with the natural hillside environment and which are designed in such a manner as to reduce the effective visible mass, including building height, as much as possible without creating other negative environmental impacts. Resolution No. 6652 EXC-2011-08 August 9, 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. The proposed development is located on the parcel as far as possible from public open space preserves or parks (if visible therefrom), riparian corridors, and wildlife habitats unless such location will create other, more negative environmental impacts. 10. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purposes of this chapter as described in Section 19.40.010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the initial study, Environmental Review Committee recommendation, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Commission finds that the project with mitigations incorporated will not have a significant environmental impact and adopts a mitigated negative declaration with a mitigation monitoring report (file no. EA-2011-OS) and application no. EXC-2011-08 is hereby approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2011-08, as set forth in the Minutes of the Plannulg Commission Meeting of August 9, 2011, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set titled: "WBJ Canyon, LLC, Single Family Residence-New � Construction, Cordova Rd, Cupertino California" dated May 23, 2011 consisting of 10 sheets labeled A000 through A07 and an Engineering plan sets dated July 2011 consisting of 4 sheets labeled 1 a nd 1 through 3, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Cotton Shires & Associates, Inc. Geologic Peer Review Letter dated July 20, 2011 and pertaini.ng to the proposed development. Notice of the availability of the remedial grading plan and drainage plan shall be provided to interested neighbors and plans shall be provided to the Planning Con�unission. 3. RELOCATION OF CORDOVA ROAD STREET GATE If the Cordova Road street gate conflicts with the driveway entrance of the approved residence, the street gate shall be relocated at the applicant's expense to a point northerly of its present location, but along the applicant's property frontage. Final location is subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works. The gate shall be kept closed during and after construction. 4. BUILDING DESIGN MODIFICATIONS The 3-story tall wall, north of the garage shall be broken up visually with architectural detailing subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development at the building permit stage. 5. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN The applicant shall provide with the building permit plan set, a construction management plan that provides the following information details: • A recitation of the City's standards for noise control and construction hours 2 Resolution No. 6652 EXC-2011-08 August 9, 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ • A site plan illustrating the locations for construction equipment and materials, porta- potties, construction/security office trailer (if any) and worker parking. • Location of signage for name and telephone number of complaint coordinator. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN Applicant shall provide a privacy landscape plan for the property incorporating any of the replacement oaks. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8. STREET WIDENING Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. � 9. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 10. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighiing shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 11. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 12. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post- development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation of existing storm water facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private properties (particularly 10690 Cordova Road) and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. 3 Resolution No. 6652 EXC-2011-08 August 9, 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 14. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ Per current fee schedule ($2,468.00 or 5%) b. Grading Permit: $ Per current fee schedule ($2,217.00 or 5%) c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $1,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ TBD e. Power Cost: ** f. Map Checking Fees: $ Per current fee schedule (N/A) g. Park Fees: $ Per current fee schedule ($15,750.00) h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond:100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements Labor & Material Bond:100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement On-site Grading Bond:100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 15. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and sixnilar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 16. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES � Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 17. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 4 Resolution No. 6652 EXC-2011-08 August 9, 2011 17. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain cerfification from a City approved third party reviewer. 18 EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 19. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 20. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non-standard appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 21. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 22. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 23. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 24. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No.125. 25. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 26. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 5 Resolution No. 6652 EXG2011-08 August 9, 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. 27. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 28. SAN TOSE WATER COMPANY CLEARANCE Provide San Jose Water Company approval before issuance of a building permit approval. 29. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject development. 30. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to issuance of building permits. 31. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9� day of August 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONEIZS: Chair Lee, Vice Chair Miller, Brophy, Brownley NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sun ATTEST: APPROVED: �s/Gary Chao /s/Winnie Lee Gary Chao Winnie Lee, Chair City Planner Planning Commission G: � Planning � PDREPORT � RES � EXC-2010-12res.doc 6 TR-2011-22 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6654 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENTS OF PROTECTED 25" AND 32" DIAMETER COAST LIVE OAK TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT LOT 167 CORDOVA ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2011-22 Applicant: Barre Barnes (WJB Canton, LLC) Location: Lot 167, Cordova Road APN# 342-17-068 SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for tree removal, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has recommended adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and � WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regard to this application: 1. That the location of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated property, that the trees are in poor to questionable health and are unlikely to survive construction on the property, despite protective measures, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s). 2. That the applicant desires to protect the 32" diameter oak and the Commission desires to afford the applicant the opportunity to attempt to preserve the tree. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the initial study, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof,: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (file no. EA-2011-08) is hereby adopted; the application for a Tree Removal Permit, Application no. TR-2011-22, is hereby approved, and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR-2011-22 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED REMOVALS The two protected oaks which are 25" and 32" in diameter are approved for removal. The oaks are described and the approval is based on the arborist report prepared by Consulting Arborist, Michael Bench, datecl June 6, 2011 entitled, "An EvaluaHon of the Existing Trees on the corner property at Cordova Road and San Juan Road, Cupertino California° (Trees #7 and #8), and a report prepared by The Shady Tree Company, dated May 25, 2011 entitled "Tree Report for 430 Cordova Rd, Cupertino California APN #342-17-068"except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. Resolution No. 6654 TR-2011-22 August 9, 2011 2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. EXC-2011-08 and INT-2011-01 shall be applicable to this approval. 3. PROTECTION OF OAK TREE #8 The applicant shall strive to preserve the 32" diameter Coast Live Oak described in condition #1 above and incorporating the protection recommendations described in the Bench and Shady Tree arborist reports. During the course of the grading and construction activities, the applicant finds that preservation of the oak proves infeasible or the oak suffers irreparable harm, the applicant is authorized to remove the tree. 4. REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENTS For each of the specimen size oaks removed, the applicant shall be required to plant one 36" box or two 24" box Coast Live Oaks on the property, i n accordance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. The required replacement trees shall be shown on the building plans and shall be planted prior to final occupancy of the project associated with file nos. EXC-2011-08 and INT-2011-01. 5. ADDITIONAL TREE REPLACEMENTS The Director of Community Development shall have the discreHon to require additional tree replacements as deemed necessary. The final tree replacement plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to final building approval. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee, Vice Chair Miller, Brophy, Brownley NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sun ATTEST: APPROVED: Ls/Gary Chao /s/Winnie Lee Gary Chao Winnie Lee, Chair City Planner Planning Commission INT-2011-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6653 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN INTERPRETATION OF THE FRONT YARD OF A CORNER LOT BEING CORDOVA ROAD FOR LOT 167, CORDOVA ROAD (APN 342-17-068). SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: INT-2011-01 Applicant: Barre Barnes Property Owner: WJB Canyon, LLC Location: Lot 167, Cordova Road (APN 342-17-068) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR YARD INTERPRETATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Front Yard Interpretation, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino's Municipal Code Section 19.08 (Definitions) defines a front lot line for a corner lot as the shorter line that abuts a street, which is San Juan Road for the subject property. WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino's Municipal Code Section 19.08.030(S)(1) provides the Planning Commission discretion to modify the provisions of this definition when it improves the design relationship of the proposed buildings to adjacent buildings or parcels. WHEREAS, the applicant has filed an application requesting that Cordova Road be designated as the front lot line/front yard of the subject parcel. WHEREAS, all necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has demonstrated that designating Cordova Road as the front lot line would improve the design relationship of the proposed building to adjacent buildings or parcels, in that: 1) The buildable portion of the lot lies well below the grade of San Juan Road. To locate the driveway/ garage at San Juan Road would require very tall retaining walls that could not be screened from adjacent neighbors; 2) Code-required yard relationships creates a building footprint on the steepest portions of the property, necessitating excessive grading and tall retaining walls to facilitate development. 3) Residential Hillside (RHS) zoning standards requires new development to minimize grading impacts and excessive retaining wall height to minimize environmental and visual impacts on adjacent properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Front Yard Interpretation is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and icesoiunon i�o. oo�� ii� i-�uii-ui HU�IIST U7� GU11 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. INT-2011-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2011, and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED PROTECT This approval is based on a plan set entitled, "WJB Canyon LLC/Single Family Residence-New Construction'/403 Cordova Road, Cupertino, California;' dated May 23, 2011, consisting of ten sheets labeled "A000, A00 through A07, 1(titled Property of Stalder), and an additional three sheets labeled 1, 2 and 3 of 3 with grading and drainage plans and details prepared Nordic Engineering, Inc. and dated July 2011, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee, Vice Chair Miller, Brophy, Brownley NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sun ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Gary Chao /s/Winnie Lee Gary Chao Winnie Lee, Chair City Planner Planning Commission G:P1aiuling/ PDREPORT/ RES/ 2011 / INT-2011-01. doc C �, � .:��� _�;b ���'' -_��-rl —.:.'��.7 , . : � : �: . `. . , �.cw ���i ���, �Cet'_P..e... �:,tiT�J' . ;; �., °"�' � :'����I�Ii�.� � � �� '' l � �J :;��'�:�i�t���� v� C s I��ult z �- 3 0 w � w Z F . �...�..e.+..�.�-.<a.c� . ¢ n . � . ,..� -�i i� � � .--� ctt U U ° o� � �� � �� � �U � � o U O � � � 1 a� V � v � � � v �, U� � M w F-+-a ,� �� � .� �� � 0 � � � 0 � � 0 z 0 > w � u Q � � ¢ O "� O Q � �. � � ¢ � w ¢V' >o W z ° U C.�7 0� Z z a w � �� � v � � � � a� � 0 U w � � �- �- w � s � DATE: h1a}', � 2011 SCALE: Jos N°: XXX SHEET N°: A000 \ — \I lot areas at 30% grade or more 01-SITE PLAN Scale:l/16" = - —r� _ i ✓ �- sas � /� \�� /i�i, —�� �� ��, � -� � � _l s es 1 O I � tg � / i i Abbreviations : ARV ARRF.VIA71(�N Ri.K at.c x'� CtiMNT C:ASF.MFNT c�.tN (:uI.D WAi7=.F t�� nc�u� DRY IIFYEi: L)W I�ISH WA_tiHF.R (F.) � F.XLS'RN(; HR H(�titi RIBB HTF HFATF.R H W HC1T W A TF.R (N) NF.W f'L. f'LA"IF. HF.IC;HT I'F I'AIF (Rl RF.I .Ih:ATED I:EF RF.PRI( ��F.RAT( �I: SH SINC;f.F. HUNt; tiLt? SI.IDINC� lF.MP TF.MI'ERARY TYP TYPI<�At. W'ASH W ASHF.R w�,� W,�� K L� NEW WALL-2X157Uf1S NEW 4VALL-2K657UC?S Dcx�F ?'-lr' DOURLF. DOOR, -4'-lP' tiLIDINC; DCk�R, �l'-0"XN_8° W I NCX?W, �4'-0"X�}'-U" ti WGLF H UNC; General Scope TU f�F.VELUPF. I.ANf) FUF SINC�I.F: FAMILY FFSIDF.N('E General Notes : ALL NEW WC�RKTO BE IN CONFORMANC'F. WITH� CBC-CALIFVRNIA BUILDINC; CODE-2(X17 CEC-CALIFURNIA ELECTRICAL CODE-2007 CMGCALIFORNIA MECHANICAL C'UDE-2W7 CPCLALIFORNIA PLUMBINC; C'ODF.'W7 CFGCAUFORNIA FIFE C'UDE-2W7 C.E�:LALIFURN[A ENERGY C.�)DE-2007 IBC-IN7ERNA710NAL BUILDINC: C'UUE-2lRb UM�-UNIFURM MECHANIC'AL CODE-2lXk; UPC.-UNIFURM PLUMBW(; CUDE-2(Nb NE�-NATIUNAL ELECTRIC CUDE-2U05 ND':-NAT. DESk;N Sf F.C:.FI)R WU�7D CUNST.-1'N7 AND ALL PER'i7NENT LOC'AL CC�DPti qND (�ftt)INANC_Eti ALL WRITTEN DIMENtiI(�N.titiHAI.L TAKE PREC'EDENC:E C�VER SLALED DIMENti1C�Nti. t:ON'iT.AC:TI`�F e1SSUMEti FULL FFti�pNtiABILITI' F��R MF.TFIOD ANn MANNF.R OF C'C�NSTRUC"T10N AND FOR ALI. IUB SI'iE SAFETI' DUFING C'UNSiT.UC'TIUN. GRADFS Pl? BE SLC�PED A MINIMUN C�F 2X AWAY FROM'iHE STFUC"fURFS FOR H��RIlUNi'AL DISTANCE AT LEhST 5'-0". ALL �ONCRE'iE "FLA7WORK" (DR[VEINAY, 1YALK5, ET�.) SHALL BE CONS'fRUCTED IN A��ORDAN('E W/ THE SOILS FEPORT. 1 Drawing Index : A000- Cover Sheet A00- Title Sheet, Site Plan A01- Topographv - Trees Location - House Location A02- Lower Level Floor Plan, Basement Level Floor Plan A03- Main Level Floor Plan, Roof Floor Plan A04- Exterior Elevations A05- Building Sections A06- Building Sections Owner Data : 430 Cordova Road Cupertino, California, 95014 Lot Data : A. P. N. : 342 -17 - 068 Lot Size : 13,886 Sq. Ft. Property Location : 430 Cordova Road Zonu�g District : RHS-21 Stories : Two Allowable Floor Area : 4,731.57 Sq. Ft. House: FAR Calculations: A= Maximum ai!owable house size prior to instituting the maximum 6,500 square foot building size. 6= Net lot area. Slope Adjustment Criteria Average percent slope of first ?0 feet of lot= 32 % Average percent slope of lot = 24 % Average percent slope of building pad= 26 % C=Ax(1-(1.5xD-0.1))) A=Maximum allowable house size = 6500 sq. ft. C=Maximum allowable buildi�g for lots with grater than 10°� average slope. D=Average percent slope of net lot area. [C=6,500x(1-(1.5x0.24-0.1)))] C=6500x(1-(0.36-0.1)) C=6500x(1-0.26) C=6500x0.74 C=4,310 Total Allowable Square Foota�;e = 4,810 sq.ft. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 4500 for first 10000 sf 59.59 sf for each 1000 sf over 4,731.57 SQ. FT A=((B-10,000)/ 1000)(59.59)+4500 A=((13,886-10,(100)/ 1000)(59.59)+4500 Total Allowable Square Foota�;e = 4,731.57 sq.ft. Maximum Buildin� Area (4,731.57 sq.ftJ X 079 (slope adjustment penalty) = 3,737.93 sq. ft. max. Proposed Conditions House : Entry Level : 2,706.70 sq. ft. Lower LeveL 509.40 sq. ft. Basement [.evel: 1,189.10 sq. ft. Garage: 437.70 sq. ft. Total Square Footage: 4,892.9 sq. ft. Impen-ious Areas Driveway 533 sq. ft. Total Impervious Areas: 533 sq. ft. Total Coveraee Total Buildu�g Area 3,559.10 sq. ft. 25.6 h Tota1 Impervious Area 533 sq. ft. 3.9% Total Coverage Area 4,092.10 sq. ft. 29.5% .,........ �... �_. ..��. ....... . . . .. . .._.. ._.. ..... ..�..... ..�.- �....... _...._.. � ..... .-f......._ v .. ����'— �;f/— �l , '�1�- /l' -� , _ . . � ��• � �=�'-r ,� E � > __._..... -_' _. �,� ��-:�,,�..,,_ . �'� . a . sr •� [�), .�� � . r . u s ,. . , �, i � � �..� .:l�.f� �i�tiw�+ ��� � �:�:Yb ��:�:'s3& ' �' z F � �.�; p ' � ': � � � :� . C ¢ c. C� . ,..i � -� � O U ; U p c O � � '� � � � ¢ � �U � O U O � Q� � � � 1 � � � � � �Q 1� U� t� M w M�--� ,� � � .�'�' � � � O � c� � O � i-� 0 � � di U W Q � � � Q O � C ^ � O 1�-� � .� 1� ¢ O w ¢ V W So ° o � oW ! z z � �. U m `--� � � ' in '� Cn -`"a� U � 0 � � F F- W [i.1 x � � � �--I � .-� � \ � � N .-�i � � � � � DATE: hiay�, 23 2011 SCALE: 1/16" = i'-0" �os H°: )OCX SHEET N": A00 1 � , , � � � � � � `� � \ � � � \ � \'G, \ � 1 � oss �� � � ,----_ � i � ♦ � / ,�, ��, 1 � �� ` , �/ , I � � s s - � \ � �` \ �� � � ' � I � O ' � ` � y" f'INF � � \ � \ � � � ` �ZSS � _ '��� 0���� � � / �'--", �' � � � Q � � � � / <v � / � - £55 - - ��, v Q'. � C' � / � / � � � \ O� ��\ - � „ Q' �F' � � �\ � ' � �/ � �_ ' �� � � 1 � ' �V � � � � �1�� � ��bs ' � n•ru��� � �\ ,_-----�---,,� � / / � �. url� � � � ,, � � � . \ .E \ i \�,� � � - ` �. /�/// �1/ sss 'p� Z� ��.� \,��� � �\ � � �� / / � � ��'�--� \ �,\ � j � � � � P G`� � \ ♦ �. `. / / � / � 9 SS — ��� —� � � � � \ ' � � 5ti � `� \ / / � � �`�' \ �, � � -" ��► � � i � � , � , 'ss$saw � ` � � � \♦ � , � q � � � /� � � � � � � �� � i � �� s- ��� ,-t; =_ \� ��\ �\ � �� ', / � � / '. .\ � � pq , � � � / \ 85. / / � � ��� ��563'T.O.W�� V � � \\\ \ \ ������ \ ,-- r �3 ` \ � � i � \ � � � G ` / � \ / DR(�EWAY� � �� / � � � ^ i � 6" C'HEFRY � � � i ( , \ / � � � i O � � � � � i � I 6SS . � �, , „„ �E.E � ; ` � � ---- ��, � � � / / \\ 562' B.OtiOI i �� i // � �/ �� \` \ `� � � i � ` � i 1� {�55 - L _` _ oss � '� --- � � -- � – =— � �q �b : ---,- _ , R�, , '--- -' �-�-�� � �a� 563' T.A.W � � � .� • � I ' i , ��� l � � \ \ i � \tj'�TREE � �. � ; / � /1 \ i � ' � -- . i 8" 0 ./ - ` i'. `J� ,9 / � /�-- _- � 7RUNK'iRF.F. � �� Z55 � /` i � � � S _ � / � / � � / �.67�.�W� �% � ` �� �� . � i / . / . / !� ` � � �Z9Sti���/ /�� �/i� v� ----- � :,� '�� ' _£95�' //� / I \ \' / / � � // � �/ /1 `\` .O ! �` -'__ i- '�___ \rS, � , ____� / � � b - � / � / /\ � � � , � ,ti��� E � . ------ , , - � / \ � £95 � i �/ �/ � � i 1lP'iF.EF, � � i � � � � /'� 5 i / � `' \r �� ' / / / i O / �` I � � 1 � /,' h" MUI.TI ` \\�� i� /� / � � /� � � � I � \ / �� i i �� 7RUNK BAY � � � � \ � � g� � - � y / `` � 1 1\ ' � _ / / '�\ � n\` ` ���TREE �- , �i � � ' � _ _ � �� , � , d � � � � g55 , , � � � � i / / � - --- % ' ^ � �� � E �� ��j � i � �IDEYARD�� �� �i i i / O 5 �� �--�_- \ g /i r ' / . ' � � 3� ci� � � 9 95 - ' - - Jr ��� � �� \ � i / � Z � .� ��. � , � � � �� � '-�---'' � __---' ` '---� � - � O i � 9 � � , r � � � � i / � ' \ �� 9 ,9 5 , / � / / i ` g" TT.EF, i _ _ � � � j � / � 4,9 � i i ' � ^ i / �� � � �-- �� ( i � � �� _ i � � '4 �i ��� � i 5 1 I � � � � � '� � �� i � 59 J y�, �Cll BPCY � � � L9S- - —� �� � ,-----,/`` i �` / � , / ��/ 9g c�� i � ��/ i � , � � � // �� - - � �� i/�/ /� �' / // /`� ' � i �� 9 i i � J (/ '1 � - 89$ �--� i�� / i _ ` \\�� , \`� - - � � � i / �i '� t� gC� � ,' / � ' i � � � '� -----� _ _ _ - �_ � � ' , � �<'� - 0 �� � � ' ' � �� I � _ ggs � � / i _ �� � �-- - � � � O ` � � � i i ,sc , L�' � � .' � � i ♦ / � � �� _ � � � �� i � _ a �r.\e� \ � ` - � � �� - ' � / 'r,�Z,LS ,-� �� � i � ` I � � 0� � i � k"� /��' v - � � %` � a � �� � � � i' ,� � � ��9 � � / / _ � � � � =�� � � � � � � � � � � �c� . � � -1 / � �. � �. �1 _ _' � - _' � i� � c� � � � / / / -- L� � ( . - y �. � � � - _ � , ' � � � c�1. � � / � � � / S � _ _ / � / �'�� _ " � � I � ' - � � , � ' � � /� i / i \ � � ,� � \ j- - ZLS� � ` � �f � � �� - �- L1 _\ --,_ ' _ _ _-- � � - � l i i � LL��I - -6L5 � \ \� \ ' / \ < \ I \ _ ` / ---_ � / --- _ / /� � ' � -� ' _ � / � z,�BaCv� � , __ ._------ i � � - £LS � � i , - _ 'f� ps' � 1 �g��s� ro.w -•- _ � � � _ � � _ � ' � ` � ' � � / � / ,'�i �Q��� � _ � � � � / �� � \ \ �=/ 1 / / /'_ /� ; � ( �" iGQO � \ � \ �i \ � EN7RY � _ � _ � / / �/ � - � _ _ / /� / i / / % i Og5 � bLS- -� �_ � � i L+iw � � I �) � i il - - _ \ _ - - � � / /� - / , � i i i _ _ l85 \ I \ / �_ i ti`9'RfiE � �'^ C/� 2-S" � �k �-- i _SZS'T�O.W - - _ T = � _ � - � � � � S�S � i / \� / � � � � .�y�� C.HEFF�-' i � ` �Y � TR � � � / � � � � T �. �- / � / i 7 � \ / / ` / \� / - � � f 7T��T.����� \ / \ - � 573_B.O.W �- _ - - - � � / � � _ � _ - i r � - z8S � / � � �� '� �_,� __- T , � ��, _ _ , �- �,� - - - - � � � \ � � - i i i� � / . ' ,� � �, �' '� � _ i � °` � / 9 _ � � '�!� _- . � __ � - - �� - - - - - - ' - � \ - , i� ��o �E�� _ GS 1_ - � / � x ' ` � x _ - ` � �`� �� _ � � � i i i t _ _ � � - - - - / ��-- =--- o Q . �� - 5rl-B.ouv � � - - - 7 _ �'�-�t - - - - _ _ � � _ � � � � �� �Y89 � � � i � i o / _ \� __ _ _ _ � �, -� - -_ � _ -v��e- �'�.�� - -- - - - , - � � ii� N ,-.J / � -Y L _ -L�`_-` � // ��S — � � _� � / � Q� Cn i \ 3",RA�' •� - 1 i 1 •'� _ _ � - -- i -- - - - _ - - - - '�-� � i� _ ---- _ 5S5 — - -�� � � __ / � � �i fy i � i oN �� � - - �� - -r� - T � - - `- - - -i - - - - - - - - _ _ � �� � / _/� �� / 1 i � � \ � � � T � / _ _ L � _ !�.......� � _ i -/ - - � _ - - '- _ _ � _ _ „1� / � � / I / \ I 7 ��'( / - - � - 1.�'i11C � J ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � - � � ` ' � / � � I \ LfJ / .� � � ""� - - � � 'Q i � ' � / i / � i � / T �� = ��-1ri''\Zv-l7LTT'ik�NY�B�j'Y� - - �r - �� -� � r _ ` � � - - - - - - - - � \ /// �— 9 � � 8LS - - - - j � i � � � ����'� � i �T � - / � � - - - - - - - �� � � _ � �/ 8S `. i / / I � = �__; ]7 4.42—�� ��'�'� r // __ � - - - � �� _ �i� �,--LBS �� � / � / i _�� � i � \ � \ �1� \`� 6 �� � � � / S� V T �� � � � � � � ;� 7 — — 88S �, , ' om �, ��' � i / J ,UAIV D — � r ' � � \\ � �' � EXLSTI C: RC�ADWAY � _ _ � 6g �6" MULTI-UAK i ti w �y ��; , ,.>' � � / ; O Q N I '° ���,�`'------'��; , � � i � „ � � j s � , � � ��� � � � � ��� ; � � � , ; ' � � c�o � i o � �� � � � *After backfill of all excavated areas of the house and retaining wails, plant native drought tolerant grasses and ground cover as to minimize erosion j �v �� - :��:,� r _ �� � , � � -- ,��=�� -� � . � ; . � - � �� ° �'�=�' ' �'�`> .,.���.. . .. ` � '": � (�,, ' -�(' °" . � . . �i s';�� f?IIr��aa-. C.� / � i���t , �� � 4�i4.:�.i�i�w RV > � ���e G��-���� � � x F � � c� .� �I � � c� U U ° � � r"� V � , 1 � � � �U � O U O � � � V � � � � � � �, U� c� M w E�—+ . a: � •� � � C� � C� � O � O O V ' TOPOGRAPHY / TREES LOCATION / HOUSE LOCATION Scale: 3/32" =1'-0" z 0 � C u w Q � O � c Q "� O � � w ¢v �o W z ° � C�.7 0� v � � �--� o � �, d� cn � c� w 0 � F w w _ � O f� V O � � � � � � � V O � � � � Q "' O � � DATE: h1ay, 23 2011 SCALE: 3/32" =1' JOB N°: XXX SHEET N°: A01 CUT 8 FILL CALCULATION Name Surtace Area Cut Fiil Net cuUfill 00.SITE REMINDER 16205 SF 0.83 CY 73.84 CY 73.01 CY 01-DRIVEWAY 532 SF 31.88 CY 9.88 CY -22.00 CY 02-GARAGE 488 SF 12.44 CY 25.23 CY 12.79 CY 03-DOWNSTAIRS 515 SF 0.40 CY 100.23 CY 99.82 CY 04-ENTRY LEVEL 664 SF 0.00 CY 76.82 CY 76.82 CY 05-BASEMENT 1207 SF 178.45 CY 5.48 CY -172.98 CY O6-ENTRY PORCHE 199 SF 0.08 CY 7.01 CY 6.93 CY 07-SIDE YARD 1451 SF 0.12 CY 174.66 CY 174.55 CY � Grand total: 8 21262 SF 224.21 CY 473.16 CY 248.95 CY � � sss ♦ , �9 / I � ` � 699 / �' / . Z9S � � i•. `°'° ' . / �9s _ _ �- / y� ' -`�s.... .. \ / s9s � BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Scale: l/S" =1'-0" / � / � �SS /'. / !ss _ ,/' � ZSg ._ _. � � ., 9 SS / . �' ; / ' / { �_ 1 � ♦ a� � ` ♦ / .._.._�.. ___.._.__.______.__..._...___....__.. .---• --_..._..,. .,_._ „ . � j�'�"-�� �!� c. �,, t l�' �-.�L'�� ` i , _ � � � � ._. " 1_�L-�' ����j� .. ��� a : �' � , ,_ .� , •r� ' s :. i ' . .. Y' . .. �� / i , • .• . ...a. w..inw� wws.if�r3� ♦.F ; q i � 1 �.� . T � h . r ' Y . •. C� .s ^_�.,._..:.. �. ».._,.,... �ecr�Jbfs � �, ''• �P5 �.:e' ,i , � t i' � �; 3 y o � w c u� _.,s...�-. e,...-..,.,.<.�..-.�.v.s._..._..«»�. - -�e++.o. ..�»a..�.e�_w.- �_+r�a . . . . .: . F . . _ ... C Q 0. �� G 6 ...��� ry° :.. .. . _._ _ _ P� 4,� y �.�°' L `� .. _. �j��......,�,5� GQ�+aG`�- \ ' �,�' : � __ ': \ . _ _ _ Y .,. � A ,� � � ............. � �. • ,... � . ..... \ � \ WNEOF BUILDM(; ' � � �..` . ��,� .. , ....... .. ABOVE , -' � i" � �`� . � ���, � LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Scale: l/S" =1'-0" ctS . r ., � •`� �--� � o U =� U o � � , 1 ^ V � , 1 � � � �U � O U O � � � � u � Q� � � � � � U� c� M w F-y , a ~� bA .� �� � 0 � � � 0 � �, 0 0 � v w Q � W � � Q O � c ^ � O �__I � � � Q U O W 'o ° � C. oW � � �' �.. °_ �, di cn � v � 0 � �w � � w w � � a W � �l w � w W � � � W � � � DATE: I�fa}', � 2011 SCALE: 1/S" =1' JOB N": XXX SHEET [V": A02 �. os ' J � ' � : / / ,� / 3T ZsC � I �- �S _� _ / � i 9ss �. / � . ,, � �s5 � f. � � � 8s _ , i 3 I Aos / . . . g / � / 09S / � , , �,r . � , / , � _ Z � s9s / _ . � / / �s � / i _ E ,-� n / / _ _. '� �' , I / � I , � ♦ / � / Y / / �'. . . i i �� / ♦ � `` �Y � `� ,. f ` ., A06 ` ♦ � � _ � .. � . � Cl0.5ET 11] SF _ __ .. - �NTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Scale:l/8" = 1'-0" / ` , �,, �.� / , � i / � `�' ! � � � `♦ i ; ; � ; �` , : \� `� y � � � x � / � ` / � � i / / �. I / ♦ : � � �` s � `s. / / \ �/ ♦ / ' � � / �� � � � / � � � / � � ` i ♦ 1 / � �,\ �� � � / � � �. i % ,' � � �_ � --��� ���� �� �� ��� ���� ��� ���. � � s � -� � � �\ � ZOOF PLAN Scale:l/8" =1'-0" 1�,��� �L;�f—��r� ���a�?�'f1'°�w? �� ,��4��—�, �, , , . . �;; •.(j �-/f . , :. .. ...�.:�.._.__���_ _. ..a � �=,«�,:: :: i�:'�. � ti��, o �t��� . � >,�... � �...�..........�...--� � ¢ �. c� .� � `•*� �--a � O U ; U o :� c � � v � � u, � �U � � o U O � � � t a� � � � � � � � � U� c� M w Hi-� , a; �� � cn � c� O � c� � O � 7'.'1 Q U 0 � w Z w Q � � ¢ O � � 0 C� � , � w ¢v �o W z I � o C�7 0�, I Z z � �, c� M .-, ° � �„ d� c1� � v , � � Q � w � � � � � � � Z w W � O W � O _ � DATE: htd}', � 2011 SCALE: 1�8° =1� JOB N°: XXX SHEET N°: A03 ?ST ELEVATION - - - - - - Scale:l/8" =1'_0" s� l� i i i i � � �� �� ����� ����� � �� � � � � — — � � � .�� �. _.% . : UTH ELEVATION Scale:l/8" =1'_0" )RTH ELEVATION Scale: l/8" =1'-0" � — — — — — — — TOP OF BLD__ _G�� i - - _ _ . . .� _ ss,�-�� v, �Nr �- �� ��t��`�, �T�'—,� ���—� � , ' . _ � � --��: 1 - �, ; . . _ _ .. . — ROOF PLATE ' � ` .. — — — — — — — — 583' -� ? � �:1 t�., i ;`:. �u±'� : x ��� � � � ENTRY LEVEL ' ' ' — � � ��i����`��� ���� �< 574' - 0" � � i � — — — �i �� � i i�� i� ��ij� — � _ _ � i � i�i�i / i�i �i �, _ DINING RM 8� �HALL � � � % � �� fi� � i� ��/� ��/ �/� i�/��i��� 572' - 6 " `/ ° . � � � i i�� � �y i�� .� �� C<� �� � �� � � � � �� � �� ������ �������%���y�i�� GREAT RM & � . � �\� \� ����� \ \� � �\�\��� � \���� ���� ������y��� : ;x ; � t,� V�.r � ��� � � � KITCHEN �,;• E z 1 �'� � � i � ��`�����fi,�� '�/ 572�-s° ; � `� � ���� � ���� �� ��� � �� ����� � � �� � �. � �, �� �fi��� , �, '� f� :� � �� � � ���� � �� �������'����fi�'��'`������i�� ��,� DOWNSTAIRS / t — 3E��' ta�i�d� 4 i�i i /� !� � i i� � � i�� � � Ti��ii�ii ii� i i � �� ��� ������� � ����� ��?���� BASE�MENT,L] � �'�\' ����� \ \� � � � � � %� = 562' - 6" � , '�� y , � �� � � � �'� � � � � ��T� � ��� �� �T�%�% ! ��� � ��y�����''�� �y'�\����� � ���< GARAGE LEVEL ! ... i �/Ni �/ i ii „ i �i,��i,���i�'� i,�i, ssz' - o" ) F- � 3 n c . - - - - _ _ TOP OF BLD_ G n � """'_ �z 591' _ 7 v � � 5 c � _ _ _ _ _ ROOF PLATE � � . 583' -�1 i` - - - � ���� i�� �ifi� � i �i i�i��i��� \ T\i /\ i � ENTRY LEVEL c� � � i � � ���� i i�y���i � i . 574' - 0 „ •.-i �� � < .�, ;�� i� �� i� � � i� '� � DINING RM 8 HAL� � � � �� �� � � � i � �� ������i �� � �.y� � 572' - 6" v,� . ��� � � �� � ��� i i i � ���� � � �%������� �� � � �� � �������\��\� GR EAT RM & �--� z � . , � . . . ��� !�� �l.� ��� � . ��1.� �1.� . � �. . .1.��! i. < KITCHEN � O 572' _ 6 U > U o :� � � � a� T,,., ,.� .,, ,.,. _ � � S� � �U 0 � U �, O � W � Q � � � ¢ � � � a � :� O� � o � °' � � U �' � w ¢ >o �, � U W g Z . � � o C�7 o W z v n.., � �, �' z ° � M w W �t+ �n .� � v ° h�-� ..-.� �� .� cn -c� � 0 � � � 0 � 0 U T^ OF BLOG � 591' -� � )OF PLATE /1 583' - 0" `1 f_R�Y LEVEL � 57q� - p�� V 2EAT RM 8 KITC�HEN � 572' - 6" `/ R�M 8 HALL�� 572' - 6'�1 MSTAIRS / 3ASEMENT ss2' - s° � �GE LE� 562' - 0" � � O � � � w w � � w � � �y � � w X T � w cn DATE: h�1ay, 23 20ll SC'ALE: 1/8" =1'-0" ]oa r���: XXX SHEET N°: A04 � s / �1��"-:��r/— �r , T� —���— � � ; � . _ - ��� ...���,�� � � ; — -- — TOP OF BLDG n " , . • 591' - 7• , . . . . . . �. � .v �. _ .��__ �_� _ _ ROOF PLATE � y =' 583' -�� t + ENTRY LEVEL ' ,�_ � 574'-0" ; ... ' ....,_�':: GREAT RM 8 ; ° ._.. ..__, _. ., KITC�HEN�] i �._=a�r:` �>",���.4qbe',C' 572' - 6" u � , DINING RM 8 HALL ; 572' - 6" � DOWNSTAIRS ! � BASEMENT � = _ �— 562' - 6" � F �i�; L_..,.... ........ .. _�....�..... . ..,�.�.,,....,,....,,..d,..•<.�.<:m ,. �.� � � � GARAGE LEVEL w .��, � 562' - 0" � � `' �` `->>% �%�� �i�i ` �i� ��y �`y`> ` �%�%�`i`i`i`i� `i`i�%yy ` `i`iy ` ` `> ¢ ; � � �� �i � i � i i i i i � �����, � ���,5,� �� � ��?�;, ����,��� � � � � � � < w , r� � � � .a � ��. �, �� � .a . .a .�. n, .. Section 3 Scale:l/8�� —1�-0�� .� � �, `� TOP OF B�LDG ] � � — — — — — — — — — — — — �: — 591' - 7" �/ U = > U o W o� w , �, �� �� .�� F-� w a� ° � �� � — — — — — ROOF PLATE n � '.� � 583' -�� � � � ,' . . .� � � � ENTRYLEVEL � U 574' - 0" �-r � — GREAT RM & � U KITCHEN — — — — — — 5�2. - 6,. O 3 DINING RM 8 HALL O � , , , � i�i �i i � \ I � � / iv� \i�� i � �i 572' - 6" Z i�i i� �� � ��������� i����i i �� ��� � i � � ' ; � � � � �.`�� ��(� � �� �� � � � �� DOWNSTAIRS / ,�� � � iy/� � � �y � ������� ��� ��,�������,y���� � y ���� BASEMENT v � � � y� � � � �� � ��� 562'-6" � • • • - - - , � � � i i�i� � • •�� • � • � � • GARAGE LEVEL � 562' - 0" � � � � Section 2 r ) �' � Scale: l/8" =1'-0" v � .� cn -c� � � _ TOP OF BLD_G � O - — — — 591' - 7�I �"� c� � O "� _ _ ROOF PIAT� �"" 583� _ ��� O U ENTRY LE_V_E��L � � 574' -�1 � GREAT RM & KITCHEN — — 572' -� DINING RM & HALL n 572' - 6" DOWNSTAIRS / BASEMENT � 562� _ 6�� � GARAGE LEVEL � 562' - 0" v DATE: tion 1 Scal e:l/S" = hfa}', 23 2011 SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" Joa ►v�: XXX SHEET N°: A05 —�,,- ?, .� , , ti :� i TOP OF BLDG � 591' -� ; A M _ ROOF PLAT_E__� ; 583' - 0"Z1 ENTRY LEV__ E� - 574' - 0" v s i GREAT RM & _ KITCHEN � , 572' - 6" LI DINING RM & HALL 572' - 6 DOWNSTAIRS / i BASEMENT � i _ �2� g" V 0 � ._..w...,.,.�..,. �w..� z F C Q a. c� . ,.., � � U � > U o � o� .�._.._. _.-----_._._____ _w._ t _,.. ._ .�r . � C'l l ''" G '� �"'''� / � / � / 1 /' ( { r ,, ' � ' 1 . f i � . . • � ���',/ � {r� r V - ' 1�` �( � _ .. a._ e , o� .. ... .. <• �.� ..�� .._� , .r , ': �,>�� ` . GARAGE LEVEL y t-�_- 562' - 0" : � �ction 6 Scale: l/8" =1'-0" Section 5 Scale:l/S" =1'-p" �ction 4 Scale:l/8" =1'-0" _ _ TOP OF BLDG � 591' -�1 __ _ ROOF PLAT_� 583' - 0" V ENTRYLEVEL 574' - 0" GREAT RM & KITCH�EN � 572' - 6" `1 DINING RM & HALL 572' - 6" DOWNSTAIRS / BASEMENT — 562' - 6" _ TOP OF BLD_ G /1 591' -�1 �„ _ ROOF PLAT_ E � 583' _ 0" v ENTRY LEVEL 574' - 0" GREAT RM & KITCHEN 572' -� DINING RM & HALL 572' - 6" DOWNSTAIRS / _ BASEMEN__ T � 562' -�1 6" GARAGE LEVEL 562' - 0" �,r � I F..��3?°, :�� j.'.. . �� � � � � � � � � �U � � O U O � N � � I � V � � � � CI) � � � U� � M w F�--� ,� .� �� c� O � «� O '� � O U O � � � r --� E--� w � � u.i H � � F � F^ p"'� w � z � � DATE: h1ay, 23 2011 SCALE: 1/8" =1' JOB N°: XXX SHEET N°: A06 / � �- �._..,.._.._.y...,.�._._..... _ .._.._�.,....�.�f..� _ z,; ,. j �'r -- ,:� � r l - �-'' �f , .?r'Jr - :.� c � / -;:�� I'. � :� � `. t � W t 1 M' . 3. .. .,.�s�� r � `` ( ! � 4' �) .,.....».�.,.M: r:�.�.-_ , ';4w tt �� � � '�`° � � �", .-�� �� / ; e:.ti s< d .:r^' �a� ?� �/ .t.. �.. n: '.�+;� .C� ;h:: i_ s, ` �6�:t � � � - , • ��''' / �,:� . ,�.� . � v �+� .•s:,..x��w N � � i� ���` `� �� � 4r / / � �� / ♦ / �� ' ��� �/ ` � � J ��� �\ � �� / / � � 20 10 0 10 20 / � i ��e�n � � � � �° °"'°�" `a°"" ""�,. �,.. SCALE: 1 "=10' / / � ,�" � � �""�� � � � � i� / � � ���� �� / Q / � �� ��r- / , �� �\ / , o ��.. � � � ; . , � � � � �, . / / / � _ �.,� � � \ 'Q' * , A �- � � '�, � � ~� � . � , , � � � � � ,� , �' cj � '� � � � `� '�a � � /� �`� / �,� � � � � � ..�, � c�a � ! � / , �`Q z� � w�°���� � �° .� � � � �°� . � V � �� � �:.� �_ .,�, � � � �,., � � � / � ��( � ,� n• � � '� �� �" � \ �. / � / � � � � � �� � � � � � � to ' � � �°" .`°� � .«.�. .�.n„ ",� .� ,� � ��,� i � �� � ��� �� � �� ,, � � °'� � � � a � � ,�` • � �• � �� i C�� �� � �� st aNC � '�� / / ��' w�' � � � �'�� ^°�,«, „� / / ' 4 � � �" °°�° � � � . � i � � � � .� — � � .�� �, �. � � . j� ' � -�. � �.,� � � ��� �..�.,�� �� �:,�� � � . � � `'� � � � � � --�.�,����� � t . �,� ��� .� �� . / � ° °� � ,.� ,� � � �,� ` � . / / � a�rr � � °"�°°�°�� F'� � � � / � / �� � �� � � ��,;`< � . , °� ». 3� � i � �° � � LOT AREA:13,886 SQ.FT. `� �� � , r ��"`� � / � � ' � ``" 3 �" d' �' ��.,,,, Y \ / ? � . 3 � ^n. ,..� ,` / � / r ��� �� �,� ��� � � �o .32AC .} �� ��� ��� � � �.�. �►Y g � � � ~ �� °� ��� �`` �°� , 4 2` a.� / � , 1 € � �" a ;� �` � � �''$ .� . l { � � ¢ �` /.. � q 24 �.� ".,,,� "�'"'° ,� ...�... ..,� � / � � ,��.,�� F�.,,* .�,k � "'�"° —a" q�tY � � ?�°"F ;Y�» 4 �...� � � / / : ?� `. Z ,,," � � �YUL71 'til�i( g y " � ...! � �""°' °°� $ �� / `s 3 �€ �� :.. ' � .' � � A ������ . � s s s 3'�r 6 � � . s� ��£ � � ��. `� M � � �� s� r ,��'s � � "q, � ' ;,o.�" ,�°° �� ,�" ,�"�.,.� / _, � ..v,a � /' �'�.� � _ �� ' � °°� rr { = �, / `°° °� g � `� � � _ _ "�:; � � � �__ — _ NOAD'�MAY EASF]E1lT � — � # w� t� 9AY � �s � --��_ ,., � � � � '� , ,;�, _ ,..,�� _ � �_� � HAY � �� � `` � � �`�� � �_ _ � � � � �: 3 � � �� ��� �� ��,, � - � � �. �° � �°��, � � , � °�.�„ °,�` `�- � — � : i�' 7t+�E � —�_ , A �-�... �,,,� � -�� '� �.�, ». ��, °°,��.,,�`�:�,°° �� .a' ,� ��� ; s sS„� ~� '�+�� ...,�_ �. ,___ `.""' � � �� � �" � � VA ''^�,,.. :1 w2'd..."'°"�"""'.�; '.,.� N ,1 �«f... �. � -�` "'` -- —_. _ UA N ROAD � �� � �w��.�..o.�,�� 'r+�r., � � �� �' � � 1` � �� ��� 4 ��� ����"�"ro�`°�.., ^' `,�� �� � � `��°""��`""°°�,�, t �:. e �''<n:`�•a; ._ � � � �. �� : �; 3 �: ��� �� �� � w ; � � � :x: � �: �i M . :a3 C � _� s i � � �� � ��� :�:;�; � � �� ;4- y . � �� � ,. �, � � W Z � � Q � (,�j� � � J f U � h � r w �io � N Z � � H � �w oz� � Q U Dt� WY 2Q10 � ,•�,� DIOrIC Jo� s�+..� ,� dr � s�,..b. N m � m � 0 .=� � v L L 61 O U a c 0 � � � � � m � GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SNALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF CALIfORNIA DEPARTMENT OF iRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPEqFlCAiIONS (1992 EDITION), S7ANDARO PLANS (DAiED JULY 1991), AND pTY OF CUPERTiNO STANDARD DETAILS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICAflONS, AND AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, AND TO 1HE SATISFACTION OF THE qTY ENGINEER. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR TWO (2) WARKING DAYS PRIOR TO REWIRINC AN INSPECTI6N. TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALUNG PERMANENT STRIPING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALI CALL FOR REVIEW aND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED STRIPINC BY 7HE CITY TRAFFIC ENGlNEER. THE CITY SHALI HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE CHANGES IN THE LOCATION OF TME AUGNMENT OF IANE STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. , �. ALL UNDERGROUND UTlUT1ES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ADEOUATELY BACKftLLED BEFORF PIACEMENT OF THE BASE MATERIAL AND SURFACE STRUCTURES. �F UTIUTIES ARE TO BE INSTALLED SUBSEQUENTLY, A WRIT7EN NOTIFICATION fROM THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY INDICATING ITS COMMITMENT TO BORE OR TUNNEL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING NATH THE WORK_ UNDERGRIXIND UTIUTIES. EXCEPT STORM AND SANITARY SEWER, NALL NOT BE PERMITTED:IN PAVEMENT AREA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF STREET CROSSINGS, UNLE55 OTNERNISE APPROVED AND AU1FfORIZED BY THE CIFf ENGWEER. 4. THE CONiRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL OF THE UTlU71ES, UNDERGROUND MAlNS, AND SERVICES THAT MAY CONFLJCT WI1H THE PROJECT LOCATEO IN THE FlELD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGRDUND SERVICE ALERT (USA) TWO (2) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK, FOR LOCAitON OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, AT (800) 227-2600. 5. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL, FILL AREAS, AND BASE MATERIAL SHALL ATTAIN A MINIMUM 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION AS PER STANDARD SPEGFICAT10N5. FOR TYPICAI TRENCH SECTIONS, REFER TO TME CI7Y STANOARD DETAILS, NATH THE EXCEP710N Of SANITARY SEIMERS. 6. ALL TREES, ROOTS ANO FOREIGN MATTER IN EXIS7ING OR PROPOSED RiGHT OF WAY SHAI� BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF TWO (2) FEET BELOW SUBGRAOE AND DISPOSED OF. 7• ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVED OR DAMAGED SHALL BE REPLACED AS REQUIREO!BY THE CiTY ENGINEER. S• ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ALL STRUCNRES MUST BE CLASS "A" (6 SACKS PER CUBtC YARD) AS PER STANDARD SPECIFlCATIONS AND SHALL ATTAIN A MINIMUM STRENGIH OF 3,000 p,5.1. IN 28 DAYS. SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND CUTTERS SHALL BE CLASS 'B' (5 SACKS PER CUBIC YARD) AS PER STANDARDiSPECIFlCATiON AND SHALL ATTAIN A MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 2,500 P.5.1. IN 28 DAYS. IF THE CLASS OF CONCRElE !S NOT SPECIFlEO ON THE PLAN OR OTHER'MSE DIRECTEO BY ENqNEER, IT SHALL BE CLASS A. 9• DROP INLETS INSTALLED SHALL 8E CITY Of CUPERTINO STANDARD UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. THE BOXES SHAIL BE INSTALLED AT THE SAME T1ME THE P.C.C. CURB AND GUTTER IS INSTALLED. CLASS "A' P.C.C. SHALL BE USED. 70. A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF SIX (6) INCHES OF P.C.C. SHAIL BE REQUIRED FOR COMMERC)AL DRIVEWAY APPROACHES AND FIVE (5) INCHES FOR RESIDENTIAI. LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMIMED PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE CURBS. THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE SAME' T1ME AS THE CURB. 11. ALL STREET CURBS SHAL� BE VERTICAL P.C.C. CURBS. 12. INSTALL CITY OF CUPERTINO SiFtEET NAME SI�NS, FOUR (4) BLADES EACH PER aSSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 13. INSTALL qTY OF CUPERTINO STANDARD MONUMENT BOX(ES) AND MONUMENT(S) AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 14. ALL GRADE STAKES AND LATHS REWIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE INSTA��ED BY THE CONiRACTOR'S ENC�INEER AS DIRECiED. MINIMUM OFF-SETS FOR CUT STAKES SHALL BE �IVE (5) FEET. 15. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE CUT SHEETS APPROVED BY THE C17Y ENGINEER. NOTIFY 1}IE CITY ENGINEER TWO (2� WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO REQUIRING INSPECTION. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REWEST FOR FlNAL INSPECTION. 17. GRADING OF LOTS OUTSIDE OF R/W AS PER TYPICAL SECTION ANO FOR CROSS-SECTION, SNALL BE COMPLETED AND APPROVEO BY THE CITY ENGtNEER BEFORE PROCEEDING IMTH PREPARATION OF THE SUBGRADE AND PLACEMENT OF SURFACE STF2UCTURES ON LOTS. ALL LOTS SHA�� BE GRADED TO THE STREET ELEVATION, OR AS SHOWN ON iHE PLANS, OR AS DEiERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 18. NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER TWO (2) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF REQUIRtNG SERVICES FOR FlELD STAKING. AT THIS T1ME. THREE (3) COPIES OF THE CUT SHEETS NALI BE fURNISHED. 19. ALL STANDARD STREET MONUMENTS, LOT CORNER PIPES, AND OTHER PERMANENT MONUMEMTS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED BEFORE ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CITY OF CUPERTINO. ! 20. MANHOLE FRAMES AND COVERS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO FIN�SH GRADE BEFORE FlNAL PAVING. 21. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT RELEASE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE RESPONS181LITY FOR 1HE CORRECTIONS OF MISTAKES, ERRORS, OR OMlSSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. IF, DURINCx THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC INTEREST REQUIRES A MODIFlCATION OF/OR;A DEPARTURE FROM iHE CITY OF CUPERTINO SPECIFICATION OR 1NESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, THE GITY ENGINEER SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE SUCH MODIFlCAnON OR DEPARTURE AND T0: SPECIfY THE MANNER IN WHICH 7HE SAME IS TO BE COMPLETED. 22. FOR ALL FlVE (5) F00T MONOLITHIC S�DEWALKS, ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND ELECTROU.ER SHALL BE INSTALLED BEHIND SIDEWALK. 23. EACH SHEET OF THE CONSTRUCTION/MODIFICATION PLANS SHALL BE INIT1AlED BY iHE GTY ENGINEER TO BE CONSIDERED APPROVED FINAL PLANS. IT SHALL 8E THE RESPONSlBILTY OF THE' CONTRACTOR, AND ALL SU8-CONTRACTORS TO INSURE THEY ARE FURNISHED NATH APPROVED PLANS OR THE LATEST REVISED PLANS. 24. AlL WATER LINES, YALVES, hIYDRANTS, AND APPURTENANCES THERETO INSTALLED WITHIN T}iE CITY OF CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL WATER UTILITYS SERVICES AREA. SHAIL BE THE PROPERTY OF SAID wntER unurr. 25. CONSTRUCTION SIGNING SHAIL BE INS7A�LED PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 27. NOTIFY GTY OF CUPERTINO TRAFFIC SIGNAI MAINTENANCE FOR INSPECTION OF FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS, (408) 777-1366, iW0 (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO POURING ANY CABWET OR SIGNAL FOUNDATIONS RELATiN� TO THIS JOB. 28. ANY AND ALL STORM UNES INSTALLED AS PART OF TNE WORN ON THESE PIANS SHAL� BE CLEANED OF AlL EXCESS MATERIAI, DEBRIS AND OBSIF2UCilONS. STORM LINES �iALI BE FlUSHED AS DiRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVAL APPROVED: T1MM BORDEN, RCE 45512, EXPIRES: 12/31/12 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DA7E: N ��. �e Q O � � �o � M ,� VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) � \ ."JI� . / ` \ � � � \ / / \ �- 3� ` i ' � ' ` \ / \ / � \ � � .___ � I I I 2a PRQJECT SIiE (ppN:342-t7-O68) �� 0 85 N RD z � U � � o � �� � v TOP OF FENCE HUNG WITH FLUORESCENT FLAGGING TAPE EVERY 10 FEET. 6' CHAIN LJNK OR WELDED WIRE MESH d' FENCE POST OF 2" DIAMETER '� GI PIPE OR T-ANGLE POST. TYPICAL TREE PROTECTION DETAiI TREE PROTECTION NOTES i. THE DEVELOPER SHAIL INSTALL TNE "TREE PROTECTION" DEV(CES PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING UR CLEARING WORK. 2, THE CITY RESERVES TNE RIGHT TO ISSUE A"STOP WORK" NOTICE IF THE "TREE PROTECTION" DEVICES ARE NOT MAINTAINED PROPERLY. 3. SEE THE PROJECT GRADING PLAN FOR SPECIFlC TREES 1}iAT REQUIRE PROTECTION. ALL SPECIMEN TREES REQUIRE PROTECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. NO El(CAVAilONS WITHIN "THE TREE PROTECTION AREA" ARE ALIOWED UNLESS UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A TREE SERVICE COMPANY. 5. ANY FILUNG NATHIN THE "TREE PROTECTION AREA" SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A DETAILED IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROVED BY THE CITY. 6. NO TRIMMING, CUTTING NOR PRUNING OF DESIGNATED TREES CAN OCCUR WITHOUT A REGISTERED TREE SERVICE COMPANY. 7. CONSULT ORDINANCE 778 OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND EXCEPTIONS. 8. APPROVED WOOD CONSTRUC110N IS AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE FOR THE CHAtN UNK FENCING. NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY USA (UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT) AT 800-227-2600 A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING UNDERGROUND WORK FOR VERIFICATION OF 1}iE L4CATlON OF UNDERGROUND U11LIT{ES. GRADING NOTES 1) CIVIL ENGINEER OR SOILS ENGINEER TO REVIEW ALL GRADING AND SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT TO THE CITY PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. 2) COMPACTION REPORTS AND PAD ELEVATION CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED ON ALL BUILDING PAD WORK. 3) CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS, (408) 777-3104, FOR DRAINAGE AND FINAL GRADE INSPECTION, WHfCH INCLUDES ORAIN LINES AND ROOF DRAINS/DOWN SPOUTS. 4) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROI AND INSURING THE AREA AOJACENT TO THE WORK IS LEFT IN A CLEAN CONDITION. 5) THE CONTRACTOR SHAIL REVIEW STD. OETAIL 6-4 ON TREE PROTECTION PR�OR TO ACCOMPLISHING ANY WORK OR REMOVING ANY TREES. 6) ALL GRADIN6 SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY -------, DATED -----_, FILE N0. --,-- 7) ALl STORM LINE INSTALlATION WITH SLOPE lESS THAN 2% SHA�L 8E CERTIFIED BY A CIVIL ENGINEER. 8} ALL ON-SITE SF,NITARY SEWER LINES AND LATERALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO BUILDING OEPARTMENT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9) UTIUZE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (8MP's), AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, FOR ANY ACTIVITY WHICH DISTURBS SOII. 10) NO Fi(LLSIDE GRADING SHALL BE PEt�FORMED BETWEEN OCTOBER t, 2011 TO APRI� 15, 2012. 11) ALL ROOF DRe�^JS AND/OR DOWN SPOUTS SHALL BE DRAINED SHEET FLOW 2� AWAY FROM THE SUtLDIr;G AND MAY BE COLLECTED BY DRAINAGE INLET CONNECTED TO PUBUC STORM �RAIN FACILITY. IF' AND ONLY IF THE DRAINAGE IS IN THE HILISIDE AREA CAN THE W?.TER BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE PUBIIC STORM DRAIN. AB6REVIATION: (E) EXISIING g N NEW yy BOTTOM OF WALL AC ASPHALi1C CONCRETE CONC CONCRETE DWY DRIVEWAY Eg ELECTRICITY BOX EG EXISTING GRADE FF FINISH FLOOR FG FINISH GRADE FL FLOWLINE GR GRATE GRD GROUND INV INVERT MAX. MAXIMUM MIN. MINIMUM N.T.S NOT TO SCALE R-O-W RIGHT-OF-WAY SDCO STORMDRAIN CLEANOUT SDMH STORMDRAIN MANHOLE SSCO SANITARY SEWER CIEANOUT SSMH SANITARY SEINER MANHOLE SW SIDEWALK 7g TELEPHONE BOX TC TOP OF CURB Tp TOP OF PAVEMENT 7YP_ TYPICAL Tyy TOP OF WALL �,y� WATER METER WV WATER VALVE Fc�pFESS/p� ,�Qw���� N �'Ut���F y y � y � w NO.C60070 m �fc �p " 1F �' CiV11- P �`� F LEGEND �-- ----..�.........,.-•�---v,.......,..�._.,.,_....._.__ _ �.._.__v�...� . -'s � � 11��� ��� / - ��' � I ����'�j `=�� ' �'�' � � ) ': '�.� �; . _ . , .�.�f-.. �-�'�/.� _ � �� g 3 ` J ` . , r `' `; i � M ��� f 'r � � 4 , . :.x , ^ _ ,.....,�...._ � { � � � ... ., , � t � , � £'. ,. '� ........., �'.. b }'`�S� .. `�P� �i P t { � �:,..;. .._...._,-.a,.,..o. .:.�.�.. : �.-.�._-�.� � EXISTING PROPOSED OESCRIP110N LINES SOLID LINES � --- SANITARY SEWER AND FLUSHING INLET - � ��- SANITARY SEWER AND MANHOLE - se'-��- s�-- oow�.o�--� STORMDRAIN AND MANHOLE v � ` � STORM DROP INLET AND LATERAL V�� 'W' WATER MAIN y� � FIRE HYDRANT _ CURB AND GUTTER � -�>- �� -�� - ELECTROLIER WITH CONDUIT ---- -- - - - -- -- EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT _�_ - - ;- �- - 1-+I rEE (wn�) - +` �--- -- +.� CROSS (WATER} " -- ` ' � cas ur,E -_ u s� -- � l SEWER LAiERAL SHEET INDEX SHEET N0. DESCRtPTION SHEET 1 COVER SHEET SHEET z GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET 3 DETAILS dc CROSS SECTIONS REVIS10N5 � e � � C N � � Ntl U � 2 b `�` �o 7 C m U U ,g 9 t9� � $ � � r •� :� s ��_ C • �a • � oi W ��" � �'av v � o N U? 01 ' ��V ��� = V � U � O 'S � �/ �� - ¢� - Zr � � Z I..L_ W � � � O _J F- � U W r'- '-� � o � N �� J. � Z V � � � � � Z � o�� U <C U Dote: JULY, 2011 Scale: AS SHOWN D� own: V,T .;ob: os�s>> Sheet � of � Shee:s N Q-� 8 Q o PROJECT SI7E oQ .� (APN: 342-17-068) U �p' S AN JUqN � 85 � �'O 2 _ U � o ��`' ➢ ,�, 5 � ViCINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) I f .�,�__...�....�...�,.._.�._��.�._ � . ' i ��.. ��� j- L , r 7 -- i c -�Z�,.� : ��o , o o � o' 20 / - > � : , ^/ � SCALE: 1' =10' � �� . �- r. �', R ! � y � _V , x / �1 / ,. t ' 1 i o � � � . t �r ' ` - w.��. . ....�., `�,�.. V ! �.._,.+...- .o i i . R'I�`CiC91i�:2!'�W`,�� .aJS ; / { i - �, � �_ ��� � , . �+t;,iy....,ic�+fJ S ^"�'q?d a.ai� ra! ? � � / r 4'i� •4rr1�v� 'Y✓�JG ��::�� g♦�i/ � . . �tii�� / � / / / / / / ?� � o � � � / i � ,Ji /, 4 , ., IrJV.=93.34 % J��ii'E � � i / o ;� � j 4 �� / / � � �/ /% 5 ` /�,� � / �' �~,, l Iv / , � ,y' � !'� / /� ?� ; Q- � (E; o"VCP� �� LaTEk 5[1^.�ER �� I;iV.=iO3.02± \ / � �/ � e � 2�- �� ; ;i ; ,� y � b� �./ � � .�i � / b� h / �/^ \ � yj � /i I, �`. �� i, . �, � WM ti �� � ' � 0. / � (\, � n . '� �� � `/� � / �4�i�:�i►��tv �r' / '� .�v� �� •^� C�tC ��iS6f ,�,° i" O� �� � ' � a �� � � / � o b^ / � ^0 � i /� / � �/ � / i �� � ' /i �T/ p t s;� �� � i / � � / / �� W � � �.-� � �,o � � , / / �°, / " '/a \\ // / �� , � / ��' � o \ � „ / � `%/ / / ` o� ' ' / � / V / � „o ryy/ \ �J � / p ^.., � � � � V" h � /, �'1 � � / �� o Z � � / � V , � / Q �' / / ^ ry� �� � � � `� s / f v � \ { � �� �, I �/ 0 8 ` 7W=722.50 ' _-� � \.. \ � �2 `� ° ; � SF 7 BW=120.67 -_ �'� / / / � F (E) TpE �`� \ � \ / � � k T 21. ` ,� �-� � � WIA \� 5 / /� / , � � _` _ TW=123.7E \ \ � ,. ' 24 BA � � \ CONC=123 GR E BRcAK y �� i� � � � �p � i ; i � � 6 � ,, , os `� ` � � / / � `-- ' c c �oNc � � � " LD ERR?' � � 12 . 5 �� � \ � , ' � r`� i,�S � �W 26.00 e � � � (E) AC CURB _ , I / i � _C NC 723.2 \ � ! �� � _ . � N N N v � � o . � N z n � m a oi � L � i m c m � \ y / ' 6 - � � � \ \\ � �/ � j ��: � \ / � BW=123.� , � r• c� � G°ADE BRtAK-'� 123.50 \ E� Sur,�H �'t � �� ` - '12�--59� RIM=129.77 � �S��B�� CONC=123.36 !NV.=124.69 � � 1 ���_ j � i \ �� ,. coN� \ � � � \ 131.50 � +� E SSMH �c � 2,16"MUL\�� :R NK BAY RIM=130.79 o SA ] ` j � \ ~_ � �� � INV=122.'a N � 1 � \ _ \-__`-__ ,`` N h'0 =.�_ ; ` - � �_ � ss �� _ (E) UTILITY CL'c- � _��SS ` ��� G -�7-- � - �� J ,c ,S ` _ � rs��� : � � `_ (E; Ai� CURg J / `` � �� - r=_ u � E; E[ / '-� - - "`�u � :s �- / �� -�, � - _ _�_ _ � � � - �t �� � / F �.l j � � dT '.. ��____ `' � � �_�"V� / �` n �t --� � � - __` (E) EGGE OF P.�,VEtsENT -� --�-.- CONSTRUCT GRASS SWALE PER DETAIL 1 ON SHEET 3. SEE GRADING PLAN ON SHEET 2 FOR FLOWLINE ELEVATIONS. INSTALL BO UNEAR FEET 18" DIAME?ER HDPE PERFORATED RETENTION PIPE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 3, 1MTH SLOPE = 0.07,. INSTALL CHRISTY U21 DRAINAGE INLET WITH IIGHT DUTY CAST IRON GRATE. SEE GRADIN( PLAN ON SHEET 2 FOR GRATE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS. PROPOSE RETAINING WALL WITH DRAIN ROCK, FlLTER fABRIC AND 4" SCHL 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE ON THE OUTER PERIMETER Of THE RETAINING WALL FOR THE BASEMEP PER DETAII 3 ON SHEET 3. SEE STRUCTl1RE DRAWINGS FOR ALL DETAILS AND SPECIFtCATIONS OF RETAINING WAL�. INSTALL 4" DIAMETER PVC SEWER LATER PIPE NATH 2� MINIMUM SLOPE. PROVIDE C�EAN( 1 F00T BEHIND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALSO, PROVIDE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALI PROTECT TREE DURING CdNSTRUCTION. SEE TREE PROTECTION DETAI CN ,SH�ET � FOft l�,ORE INfORMATiCt�f. or��n�rc- rvicr��l� mrr/a-� ..�.. �.�t..�.� '.....-r .�.....r-.. ......�.....�.... .,..... ......,�... ...�. EARTH WORK QUATITIES F � \ \) roE-��( VOLUME CUT VOLUME FILL � \ ` 1" ` �G� � (CUBIC YARD) (CUBIC YARD) A �� BASEMENT 170.22 0.0 � \ FOUtaD � � 6 � RE N� DI o`�' DRIVEWAY 30.98 9.72 ._�� � GR=102.0 GARAGE 28.8 12.22 ♦ INV=97. FRONT YARD 12.31 69.31 i � �BER Y �\\ � 3 0� TOTAL 242.31 91.25 \ � � 6 8"ELDERBERRY v �� / 'a '� � � ' / � W � ` �°� IA�IPORT: OA �CUB C d' . i / ( E � 'OE '1' � 0 � �`�' i 4 � R S NOTES: EARTH WORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE �- � 103.65 °o-. o� APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S �' �` a° PERFORATED PIPE J �� i � RESPONSIBIUTY TO INDEPENDENTLY �� . �=� �E INV.=107.38 - �s�. � \ (DAYLIGHT) ��° `�„ ss. / � USE.�TE QUANTITIES FOR H�S/HER OWN 7 • ,� / � �' / � / �L �� � +1 ` � / � U L TI / ���p � \ ^ / � � 2U BA j q �� � �GRP.DE tAK °� W ,/ C _ _____ • � s� 'GNK\ __ / � - -►- _ Y i ' � ,��`L v � + � � � ),� ^ 1 � ( ) SDCO� __� i 6 ` / / 4"PER ATED IPE < < � \ � 'y � / p.54 v.= i os. a , � ,�ti'" / E�10� (HI POW �__�, - �E) TOC ` GRAO REAK�� � % / \� `� �1Y �/ � � / ^`L / FL ._r / i * ��� � 114.3 9" ULTI TRU. AY / � � � i � ,� ` � ry � / � SQ �0. /4Ci. / / � GRADE EAK � � ,�r� ��$ / � � / / ' __ = � � � (E, 70E � � � /�,� / � * / O / NC ' \ -- i__ � ' `1,�� ;r 5.84 ` FL .�. i `� ����� 119.06 ^� i � /�O � � j � � ��- , �� � =1 .7 � / � 3W=123.7 j� �� � , �W , ��,. , - F. C � �'' o i 0 i FL � m � h�� �i .28 � / o , � � ,� �� , - _ - W _ ;E? ra��� / % �pFESS/O LDERE - / Q �G� Nr VY��F` 3� �� , _ � F /� �y � `�y y G_ �`� � i w NO. C60070 m rr y ------- ---- - -- - - {E) WAL' o -�� / * � � �k - - _ �� c��/ �,� CIV14 ���' _ � ; � OP �- � ' - e: / 'h �--_- y, � - b '�� �i� / -� _ FOUNG 3/4"I.P1 � �" � � ` /; ; '�' � � `_ � �o �1ULTi � �TRUNK O.qK � � , � � C � `� rs � � j EDGE 0� PAVEF,IE^d \ �- rs �_� T u / -� _�-_- sr � - _ _ 1$ ��� \ - s_ _t �-- • �E SSMH _ � � �_ s:�_ Q I!.A-144.29 \ ,rr(E) EDGE CF PAVENENT REVISIONS � c 0 U N C N t �� mc� � Z � Cat� a $ �° c � 1 x s c g� LLa� c .� .�� �� �� � C U N � u�i C D o� � + � m N V Z � pW m O 3 � � U U � � C � m � _' Q �+ _ Z t ��W L � �..L.. W � Q Z � 1..L� � Q 'p � U I � w � � O I z C� N �„_ Z � LL Q i Z � C� Q U Date: JULY, 2011 Scale: 1'=10' Drown: V.T Job: 061511 Sheet /� L of 3 Sheets N � 0 �; m 0 � � � z � a c 0 L t!1 C m � F----- 24" 24" � I ` - NATIVE MATERIAL I �--- COMPACTED TO 95% i I I —� ! I—I I RELATIVE COMPACTION N I I I- I( I—I �( I I( I � �i — _i� —-���— DETAIL 1: GRASS SWALE (NOT TO SCALE) � NATIVE MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION 3/4" DRAIN ROCK FORE RATiON: 0.3 18"' DIA. PERFORATED HDPE PIPE WITH 5=0.0q : �11RAFY 140N FILTER BABRI,C � 4.0' � DETAIL 2: RETENTION CHAMBER (NOT TO SCALE) I 7 05 �------- � i PROJECT�ITE ��I � ------ (E �ADE � _ � �- 100I------ -' � (N) GRASS � l SWALE� � I �� 95 f ------- .— _-� N DA1 L%/.f E'L�'�_ I RETENT ON I PIPE I I -- 90.00 � ---- 10 20 SECTION A-A SCALE: HORIZONTA�: 1'=20' VER TICAL:1 "= 20" - —� , -- � ' 140 � -�-�-- -� � PROJECT � � '� t35 �� ,��-1 DATU.S! ELEV �� ��E) C�12ADE � 130.00 p 10 SECTION B-B SCALE: HORIZONTAL:1 "=20' VERTICAL: i"=20" I R-O-W �N) WA�L ( TYP. ) 120 � ------�-}---- -- ' (E) GRADE (N� GARAGE i� 115� ----- ^ � � � ----- -�----_ � I (E) A,. _ - ,_ 110 F-� PAVEMEN ' � _ ' �9.2% ---- -- j (E) AC �N)�DRIVEWAY � D.ATL:W ELE6' ; BERM PROJECT SITE — -- —�_. ID�.GO � 10 20 30 4C 50 SECTION E-E SCALE: HORIZONTAL: 1 "=20' VERTICAL: t"=20" NATIVE SOIL COfdPACTFn m an� I 3/4 " DRAIN MARAFI 140 FILTEf �OOFING JG WAII FOR NT ARRlER PER SOILS REPORT MENT FLOOR �CAPILLARY BREAK MATERIAL RER SOlLS REPORT iz 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE ' DETAIL 3: RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE (NOT TO SCALE) � NOTES: 1. PROVIDE DRAIN ROCK, FILTER FABRIC AND 4" SCHL. 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE PER DETAtI 3 ON TNE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE RETAINVNG WALL FOR THE BASEMENT. DRAtN AT MINIMUM SLOPE OF i% SEE GRADING PLAN ON SHEET 2 FOR INVERT ELVATION AND DAYLIGHT. 2. FLOOR OF BASEMENT TO BE PLACED ON VAPOR BARRIER AND CAPILLARY BREAK MATERIAL PER SOIL REPORL 125 120 115 DAT_U.if GLEf� I70.00 0 10 AREA CUT = 222.89 SQ.fT AREA FILL = OA SQ.FT � -.---- ----- ' �(E) EDGE OF R-O-'•N i ,! PAVEMENT , �-- - ��E) GRADE � --�------- ' � i � � F ----t-- _ ! � ' 140 �- � — - ' --= �E� A� ` �� -1--- PROJFaCT i � PAVE�t T , � i SITE i ; ,3s----- ----.-� �--- - -- I ' �(E) G�2ADE � � � } �' ;— 130 — - -�--� -=--t- - I ' � I � i � I � t 25 �------ -}--- -------- --- ' i �'----- i ' �---- I , UATL'.•'Lf ELE� I � i ! i --- `----- ' --- i -- --�-------��---�.-_-._-, 120.00 0 10 20 30 40 SECTION C-C SCALE: HORIZONTAL: t"=20' VERIICA�:1 °= 20" (N) WALL 120 �— -- � - -� � I(N GARAGE I -� , � s L - _=-=� �=„2.04 _ I i � 1 ' 110 --}------� ' � (E) GRADE'� � D�]?'G;y E'LE'l' i � ---. ---- � --- --J 10�.0U 0 ' 10 20 SECTION H-H SCALE: HORIZONTAL• t"=20' VERTICAL: 7 "=20" AR� C,�1T = 35.36 SO.FT ._�_w__......__.�-.---» --�--�--�- -�°--- AREA FILL�= 15.83 SQ.FT 'Nj-�2cl1-U� , ��''�l�".�� / " � e �_� �� —���.�...— ��' �- � _ .� - .�.,�-�..__._.,.e __. a . ;,� -.��_,, � � , a, � Si t� ..:s . �.., ��!i�...:H4•��� _ _ �. ^ �c� :;t J � } �'�- ��,_.<. r < �Jt�=��:.'.Ei:h'V . , � . .r. 1G�3� � �'a °: d.�� � t �.� � � '�"""""��"�'��� STRUCTURE DRAWINGS FOR RET i �OFESSlp � �� N � U �F� c � `y\ �, y � 2 �' � No. C6007p m * Exp Cb-�� � * sr Gv►� ���' F � AINING WALL LAYOUT, FOOTINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS R-O-W � 2s ; - -------{---;-- -----,—; j � I ;(N) YARD i I � i 2.47 j 120 � AC -{----T �I'—�_ � __' r �E� AC j I PAVEME�� BERM __--T , ��._r.�--'--- - "� � i 115 r--�-- ---,-"��E) GR E i (N) IGRASS � i � Dr!'lL;?! E1.El� I SWALE PRUIECT SITE � - ___1___-__.-y_—_�-J IIU.00 0 10 20 30 SECTION D-D SCALE: NORIZOhiTAL: 1 "=20' VERTiCAL: t"=20" � I REVISIONS m �c � � N U C N t�0 2 � � N �Zo �� � 7 C W U � c9�, °gm m C � N T � m � m '+� � c G • m • �'rn C� c� c c u W m y '4'rnn m ^�� Cl � b ry �Z Ol W �p C O'� m �O3 Z a � d V � ° rn p c ` y �� z c - m i) I — �� z - 0, �� V / z � f W VJ U� ('r1 r ^ w V J � � � U U ( � w � c- O I z J � � � � � LLJ � � 0 Q U D�te: JULY, 2011 �cc;e AS SHOWN e�aw-, v.r JV�. �6�5�� Sreei � o! 3 S!-ects 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 SECTION G-G SCALF: HORIZONTAL: 1'=20' VERTICAL:1 "=20"