TR-2011-42b OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT 1 N O (408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • planning(a�cupertino.org
September 19, 2011
John Rickard
Apple, Inc.
10480 Ridgeview Ct
Cupertino, Ca. 95014
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION LETTER - Application ASA-2011-15, TR-2011-42
This letter confirms the decision of the Design Review Committee, given at the meeting of September
15, 2011; approving an Architectural and Site approval to add a new 650 square foot lobby,
accessibility improvements, new windows and skylights to buildings at an existing office complex
and a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of 20 trees that are part of an
approved landscape plan at an existing office complex, located at 1 Results Way, according to
Resolution No. 307 and 308.
Please be aware that if this permit is not used within two years, it shall expire on
September 15, 2013.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days from the
mailing of the notification of this decision. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing,
which will be scheduled before the City Council.
Sincerely,
� 1�..-
Colin Jung
Senior Planner
City of Cupertino
Enclosures:
Resolution No. 307 and 308
Plan Set
CC: XL Construction, 851 Buckeye Ct, Milpitas CA 95035
TR-2011-42
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 308
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 20 TREES THAT ARE
PART OF AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR AN EXISTING OFFICE
PARK AT 1 RESULTS WAY (APN 357-20-041)
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: TR-2011-42
Applicant: John Rickard (Apple, Inc.)
Location: 1 Results Way
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application to
allow the removal and replacement of 20 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan.
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that:
1. That three of the trees are dead or dying.
2. That the location of the other 17 trees restrict the economic enjoyment of the property
by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by
owners of similarly zoned and situated property and there are no reasonable
alternatives to preserve the trees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, the Application No. TR-2011-42, is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application TR-2011-42 as set
forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of September 15, 2011, and are
incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the Plan Set titled: "Apple Inc. - Results Way Campus ", prepared by
Studios Architecture and consisting of three sheets labeled L1.0 - Tree Disposition and L2.0,
L2.1 Planting Plan, dated August 24, 2011, except as may be amended by the conditions in
this resolution.
Resolution No. 308 TR-2011-42 September 15, 2011
Page 2
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions.
You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest
these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying
with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of September 15, 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Chair Miller, Sun
NOES: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: none
ABSTAIN: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: none
ABSENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: none
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/ s/ Gary Chao / s/ Marty Miller
Gary Chao Marty Miller, Chair
City Planner Design Review Committee
• •
•
� �