Loading...
V-2011-02b City of Cupertino , . � 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 C U P E�tT! N O FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department October 26, 2011 Trillium Atln: Valerie Tellerico 7901 Stonebridge Dr. #503 Pleasanton, Ca. 95088 SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, V-2011-02, TR- 2011-65 This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Conunission, given at the meeting of October 25, 2011, approving a Use Permit and Architectural and Site Permit to allow the co-location of a personal wireless service facility, consisting of twelve panel antennas mounted on a previously approved (but un-built) 70-foot tall monopine with an associated base equipment enclosure at a planned residential development; a Variance Permit to allow equipment cabinets to be setback less than three feet from a side yard residential property line; and a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of one 65" diameter Monterey Pine to facilitate the construction of a person wireless service facility, located near 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, according to Planning Commission Resolution No. (s) 6676, 6677, 6678, and 6679. Please be aware that if this Permit is not used within a ten-year period, it shall expire on October 25, 2021. Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days from the mailing of the notice of the decision. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled before the City Council. Sincerely, Colin Jun Senior Planner Plannulg Department Enclosures: Resolution 6676, 6677, 6678 and 6679 CC: Saul Hoffinan, Rancho Deep Cliff HOA, 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff D� Cupertino CA 95014 g:/planning/post hearing/actionletterU-2011-02,ASA-2011-18, V-2011-02, TR-2011-65 V-2011-02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6679 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO BE SETBACK LESS THAN THREE FEET FROM A SIDE YARD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE NEXT TO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: V-2011-02 Applicant: Valerie Tallerico, Trillium (for AT&T) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Variance, as described on Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more Public Hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support this application, and has met the following findings in order to grant the variance: 1) There are special circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to property in the same district, in that according to the applicant(s), this is the only analyzed cell site that meets the functional RF coverage requirements for both wireless carriers: Verizon Wireless and AT&T. The site has good line-of-sight down Stevens Canyon Road/ Foothill Boulevard and all properties downslope to Stevens Creek without the obstruction of trees and hilly terrain that made the seven alternative sites nonviable for the applicant. In addition the location is well-screened by shorter trees, with reasonable access to needed utilities and has a willing property lessor. In addition, the proposed cell site location on the project property will result in the least amount of visual impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. 2) The special circumstances applicable to the property deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The common open space areas of R1C-zoned developments are commonly developed as landscaped pedestrian walkways or recreational facilities. The project site is a narrow portion of the common-interest area situated between the rear of a single-family residence and the rear of an apartment building. The area is not conducive to the development of landscaped pedestrian walkways or recreational facilities. Resolution No. 6679 V-2011-02 October 25, 2011 3) The issuance of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning in which such property is situated. The only other vicinity properties that are permitted by zoning to host a personal wireless service facility are: RHS-zoned properties, common open space areas of residential developments, parks, Deep Cliff Golf Course, Stevens Creek Plaza Shopping Center and Monta Vista High School. All of these other alternative sites were deemed infeasible by the applicant. Thus, the granting of this variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges. 4) The variance is not being issued for the purpose of allowing a use that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of the property. The Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance expressly allows the construction of personal wireless service facilities in commonly-owned areas of residential developments with a use permit review. 5) The granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare, or convenience, and to secure the purpose of the title. The facility has been designed to blend in with the residential environment and will mitigate noise and geologic impacts. RF energy exposures are estimated to be well-within federal safety standards. The availability of wireless communications coverage to this area will improve public convenience and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for variance is hereby approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino. That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application V-2011-02 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 25, 2011 and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "AT&T/CN4008/RANCHO DEEP CLIFF/ 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE/CUPERTINO, CA 95014" prepared by Connell Design • Group, LLC dated 10/ 04/ 11 and consisting of nine sheets labeled T1, F1, C-1, A1, A2, A2.1, A3, A4 and A5, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, Resolution No. 6679 V-2011-02 October 25, 2011 dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee, Vice Chair Miller, Brophy, Brownley, Sun NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: � s/ Aarti Shrivastava / s/ Winnie Lee Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission g/ planning/ pdreport/ res/ 2011 / V-2011-02 • • or a � �ona . n orma ion . ee i e _ _ _ _ _ _