The URL can be used to link to this page

86-131 H. J. Degenkolb Associates & Engineers, Professional Consulting Services N 13 A;T3 snTTauaoD Atpoaoc /s/ UMW ouT;zadnO 3o A}T0 'ioAux saa2og w snsgzsg /s/ :0'3AOudd'd auoH : ySEN auoH :INBSEN auoH :MON sza2og 'sxzsdg 'A2unia 'uosugor 'oggsg :San 1T0000O '4TO atp 3o saagwe 940A :awn bupioiio3 atp Act 9861 ' IixT 3o AEP 4L sTu} out;iednD 3o A;TO ata 3o TTounOJ Agro eta ;o bttpaaot nETnbaz E ;E u IMari QESSVa sou II 3iegeq uT o; pea-raga/ uTaaat; quaunazbe a pead� ;o A} O a1O '3T0 e014pue .zoA OS a;II Ha ' pa2T.zotanE AQaxaq sae NLj EN ati} ;Etp 'fI3A'IOS3ii � adaaalin 'MON ilieui eq4 PUP sxzoM oiignd 3o . a etp Aq petcxddd uaeq buTAeq ;uua1 az5E PTEs Pue 11Touf3 A;TO etp o; pew-ass-1d ueeq seg 'seoTAass razrnbez etp 3o suompuoo pus sorsa; aq4 burumno 'szeautbug sa;eToossif ctoxuabaa 'r 'H put ouTga dtno 3o A;TO am. use/gag queweezbe ue 'Sv'32I2EIM pue :saoTnzas Azesseoeu atp apTnazd o; buTTITM Pue PsTUTTenb sT szaauTbvg 'sa;EToossif qmpxuabaci 'r 'H 3o waTg atp isciamm SapzazaW otn; egg 3o suoT3Ep�mo; atp raTnaz Ped SSE; pue sue-Ed Teztt�nz;s azEdazd o; que}insuoa e 3o seOTnzas atp buibebua ;o snortsap 3o A;TO ata 'svarapg )IN'dL 530 . taPI 30 23IVd3H MIL Hal MIMES ellarcENEONH DULDIOSN00 HO! D IIOSA(%d 'SL13<3NION3 'S LMcOSSd ETIO?IIisma 'r 'H HIM allaEMEN do NOTTLD2XZ ONIZRIOHLfid ONTntaino 30 am sta 30 =WOOD AIM Mil 30 NOIJLIIOS3uu FI 0089 'ON NOIJIIIOS2H / (ATTACHMENT) M P'.R\- ` .';, to /a OooV-/76 ) ' Y gal- -Ari exepeeo( �' /1,000.0[ City of Cupertino 0 16 6.0 .6 ac.,/ AGREEMENT NO. BY THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on the /MI day of 3/ gin / 19 S C by and between the CITY OF CUPERTINO (Hereinafter referred to as CITY) and Name (1) H. J. Degenkolb & Associates, Engi(2 ers1 • Address 350 Sansome St. , Suite 500 City San Francisco I Zip 94104 Phone (415)392-6952 (Hereinafter referred as CONTRACTOR), in consideration of their mutual covenants,kthe parties hereto agree as follows: CONTRACTOR Shall provide or furnish the following specified services and/or materials: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS SERVICES DELIVERY. EXHIBITS:The following attached exhibits hereby are made part of this Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK, EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSAL, EXHIBIT "B" TERMS The services and/or materials furnished under this Agreement shall commence on ASAP and shall be completed before Mat eh 31, 1986 (4o be nee, cktalredr) AWA) COMPENSATION For the full performance of this Agreement,CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR: TIME & MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SCHEDULE IN EXHIBIT "B" BUT NOT TO EXCEED $11,00( GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Hold Harmless. Contractor agrees to save and hold harmless the City,its officers,agents and employees from any and ,ei)iW all damage and liability of every nature, including all costs of defending any claim, caused by or arising out of the et- City shall not be liable for acts of Contractor in performing services described herein. Insurance. Should the City require evidence of insurability Contractor shall file with City a Certificate of Insurance O before commencing any services under this agreement.Said Certificate shall be subject to the approval of City's m d Director of Administrative Services. S V Non-Discrimination. No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons under this agreement because of d v, the race, color, national origin,ancestry,religion or sex of such person. g S Interest of Contractor. It is understood and agreed that this agreement is not a contract of employment in the sense LI. 9 pt that the relation of master and servant exists between City and undersigned.At all times Contractor shall be deemed to 4L p bean independent contractor and Contractors not authorized to bind the City to any contracts or other obligations in executing this agreement.Contractor certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest under this 0- . agreement is an officer or employee of City. Changes. This agreement shall not be assigned or transferred without the written consent of the City. No changes or d�C variations of any kind are authorized without the written consent of the City. S-sr CONTRACT CO-ORDINATOR and representative for CITY shall be: �Qs S Name Department Public Works, City of Cupertino s QJ k. Traviee Wttitteu, Asst . Ci�y Eugiuese (408) 252-4505 6 4 Address 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,CA 95014 Telephone This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution by CITY, in witness thereof, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first written above. CONTRACTOR:-QCITY qF CUPERTINO: By C\h•-Yn—.i tt 6a-2-e/r By P/ Title Prectdpn+ Title APPROVALS ( tp/..,, , � " DepartfHead Date Cr.,. .. av, ‘ ,/ Y ,,/�� 4 s EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK o Slope stability, including eathquake effects. o Evaluation of the tank itself and its anchorage for response to earthquakeforces. o A preliminary foundation design. We propose to perform this work in two (2) phases: Phase 1-a. Review and evaluate all existing data and assess the slope stability using present-day technique. -b: Evaluate the tank structure for earthquake forces, examining in particular any tendency for buckling and any anchorage requirements. -c. Develop alternative solutions and identify the risks associated with those solutions for: 1. Releveling of the tanks. 2. Providing slope stability, if required. 3. Reinforcing the tanks, if required. -d. Summarize findings in report form and review with the City. -e. Provide an analysis as an alternate to the foundation design outlined above. This analysis shall include minor grouting and filling @ the tank ring wall and sand cushion on an annual basis. -f. Provide recommendations on foundations and support of tank bottom, ring wall and inlet piping. -g. Formally meet with City staff'on at least three (3) occasions during the development of the review and report. Data, work sheets and evaluationsmaybe exchanged at this time. Phase 2 Not part of this agreement. •J I• Harding Lawson Associates EXHIBIT "A" Engineers, Geologists Supplement & Geophysicists 7 Harding Lawson AsIoelates EXHIBIT "A" Supplement December 6, 1985 H. J. Degenkolb Associates 350 Sansome Street 1 Sart Francisco, California 94104 J Attention: Mr. Tom Wosser ] Gentlemen: Water Tank Evaluation City of Cupertino Cupertino, California ` Harding Lawson Associates would be very pleased to work with you on your evaluation and development of recommendations for the City of Cupertino water tanks. We have provided similar services for many above-ground water tank projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, including several owned by IBM Corporation. Our proposed project team would consist of Frank L. Rollo, Vice President, J and Paul C. Guerin, Senior Engineer. Mr. Rollo is currently serving as principal engineer for the soil and foundation investigation being per- formed for Marriott Corporation's site in Vallco Park, Cupertino. Resumes for these individuals are attached. Also attached are a list of representative liquid storage tank projects, projects performed in Santa Clara County, and our corporate brochure. If J we can provide additional information or if you have questions, please call. 1 . Yours very truly, J HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES jet 1, ,t3V(- Frank L./1 Rollo 1 Vice President J ML/FLR/nlh Attachments: Lists of Representative Projects Resumes of Key Personnel Corporate Brochure •I Engineers 666 Howard St. Telephone Alaska Hawaii 1 Geologists& San Francisco 415/543-8422 California Nevada • • JEXHIBIT "A" lSupplement J LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE LIQUID STORAGE TANK PROJECTS FOR WHICH 1 HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES HAS PERFORMED GEOTECFNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES J Name and Location of Project Client Ground-water sampling for volatile Confidential organics, processing plant storage tank, Santa Clara, California Monitoring well design/installation, Ray L. Hellwig Plumbing & Heating i storage tank, Santa Clara, California Company Soil investigation; drilling, Confidential sampling, and monitoring well 1 construction Four storage tanks, San Jose, Almaden Vineyards California 1-million-gallon water storage Robert Walter tank, Santa Rosa, California (Fountain Grove Ranch) ] 5-million-gallon water storage City of Anchorage reservoir, Anchorage, Alaska Water Utility District J300,000-gallon water storage Citizens Utilities Company of tank, Larkfield, California California 1 1/2-million-gallon water storage City of Millbrae tank, Millbrae, California 1 Two 300,000 bbl and two 50,000 Guam Oil & Refining Company bbl tanks, Apra Harbor, Guam ] Dynamic analysis for under- Pacific Gas & Electric Company • ground fuel-oil storage tanks for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power 1 Plant, Orange County, California ] Tank farm and pump station, Pacific Gas & Electric Company 1 Hercules, California Union Oil water tank, Union Oil Company Rodeo, California 1 • 11 EXHIBIT "A" Supplement LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE LIQUID STORAGE TANK PROJECTS FOR WHICH HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES HAS PERFORMED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (continued) Name and Location of. Project Client • Tank removal, Petroleum facility, Confidential J Sunnyvale, California Seepage investigation, Beckman Instruments, Inc. J chemical facility storage tank, Palo Alto, California J Water storage study of nine sites City of Vacaville and Reimer for Environmental Impact Report, Associates Vacaville, California 50,000-gallon water-storage Jordan/Avert & Associates facility, Point Reyes, California J Eight oil storage tanks, Shell.Chemical Company i Deer Park, Texas J 9/84 j I I . 11 1 EXHIBIT "A" Supplement REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PERFORMED BY HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Name and Location of Project Services Provided Client • Baylands Athletic Center, Soil engineering recommendations and Daniel, Mann, Johnson Palo Alto, California _ construction control. and Mendenhall Redwood City, CA California Savings & Loan Assoc. , Soil engineering recommendations and California Federal Palo Alto Branch, California construction control. Savings & Loan Assoc. , Los Angeles, CA Stanford University Reservoir, Site investigation. Lawrence G. Brian Palo Alto, California Redwood City, CA McLaughlin Glen, Maybell Way, Consultation regarding fill and drainage. Jones, Thenn & Assoc. and Georgia Avenue, Palo Alto, CA Palo Alto, California Residential Building Complex, Soil investigation. Stanford Properties Palo Alto, California Covenant Presbyterian Church Soil and foundation investigation. Covenant Presbyterian Sanctuary, Church, c/o Alfred W. Palo Alto, California Lee, AIA, San Mateo, CA Apartment Development, Consultation and inspection, soil inves- B&D Properties Willow Road and San Francisquito tigation and slope stability study. San Francisco, CA Creek, Palo Alto, California — " m„ , • —+ J `1 I_. La L EXHIBIT "A" Supplement REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PERFORMED BY HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (continued) Name and Location of Project Services Provided Client Alza Research Facility, Retaining wall design criteria. John A. Blume & Assoc. Palo Alto, California San Francisco, CA Bullock's, Stanford Shopping Foundation investigation. Federal Department Center, Palo Alto, California Stores, Inc. , c/o Welton Becket & Assoc. , Architects and Engi- neers, San Francisco, CA Yacht Harbor, Environmental, geological and engineer- George S. Nolte & Palo Alto, California ing consultation. Assoc. , San Jose, CA • Veterans Administration Hospital, Foundation investigation. Veterans Administration Blind Rehabilitation Center, through consulting Palo Alto, California engineers/architects Commercial Building, Soil investigation. Landes Construction Co. Los Altos, California Redwood City, CA Security Pacific National Bank, Foundation investigation and observation Security Pacific Los Altos Branch, San Antonio during construction. National Bank, San Road, Los Altos, California Francisco, CA St. Francis High School, Geotechnical engineering services. Angus McSweeney, Inc. Mountain View, California John Michael Lee, Assoc., San Francisco, CA a L_a u L.....a L—a u L.-2 Lei EXHIBIT "A" Supplement . REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PERFORMED BY HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (continued) Name and Location of Project Services Provided Client Office Building and Press Room, Soil investigation. Dana Bryant Corporation Mountain View, California c/o Robert .M. Burke Burlingame; CA El Camino Hospital, Geologic and seismic investigation, El Camino Hospital Surgery Facility Expansion, foundation engineering, and preparation Mountain View, California of design earthquake data. Roundtree Subdivision, Units 1 Soil investigation. U.S. Development Corp. and 2, Cupertino, California Walnut Creek, CA Bullock's Vallco Park, Foundation investigation: Bullock's Northern Cupertino, California California, Menlo Park, CA Shoreline Park Study, Preliminary soil engineering studies. Department of Parks and northern Santa Clara County, Recreation, County of California Santa Clara, California Gates of Heaven Cemetery, Geologic and seismic hazards study. Archidiocese of Santa Clara County, California San Francisco, CA • Security Pacific National Bank, Foundation investigation. Security Pacific Mountain View Branch, National Bank Mountain View, California San Francisco, CA Kaiser Permanente Cement Plant, Site inspection and consultation. Engle and Engle Santa Clara County, California San Rafael, CA L a L_i L_i lei I_4 r EXHIBIT "A" Supplement . REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PERFORMED BY HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (continued) Name and Location of Project Services Provided Client Lo's Osos Dam, Coyote Creek Flood Preliminary investigation and design for Santa Clara Valley Control Project, Santa Clara site selection. Involved geologic hazards Water District, c/o County, California investigation and dam engineering. George S. Nolte & Assoc. • Levitz Furniture Store, Pavement services. Levitz Furniture Stores Santa Clara, California Lexington Dam outlet structure, Magnetic survey. Santa Clara Valley Santa Clara Valley, California Water District Manufacturing plant, Monitoring well installation as part of Confidential Santa Clara, California hydrogeologic investigation for hazardous- waste management. Manufacturing plant, Site monitoring; single-point sampling, Confidential Santa Clara, California sampling of ground water and volatile organics for hazardous-waste management. Processing plant storage tank, Ground-water evaluation, sampling of Confidential Santa Clara, California ground water and volatile organics. Manufacturing plant, Test borings and monitoring well tests for Confidential Santa Clara, California hazardous-waste management. Industrial facility processing Ground-water monitoring for hazardous- Confidential and manufacturing plant, waste management. Campbell, California a ;,,_a J J -a J J - . u Ls1 Jl L-J L-f L_ 1 i_.. . 6-4 'J :1 EXHIBIT "A" Supplement REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PERFORMED BY HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (continued) Name and Location of Project Services Provided Client Wastewater facility, Borehole electrical-resistivity surveying Confidential Santa Clara, California and hydrogeological investigation. Manufacturing plant, Ground-penetrating radar survey prior to Applied Materials Santa Clara, California drilling, to locate buried objects. Storage tank, Site monitoring, monitoring well design/ Ray L. Hellwig Plumbing Santa Clara, California installation. & Heating Company Storage tank, Soil investigation; drilling, sampling, Confidential Santa Clara, California and monitoring well construction. Regency Plaza high-rise, Pile study, soils engineering analysis, Maskatiya Suri and Santa Clara, California including determination of bearing Company capacity for deep foundation, and observation and testing during construc- tion. Warehouse, Hydrogeologic investigation, soil E. A. Hathaway & Santa Clara, California sampling, monitoring well installation, Company ground-water sampling and monitoring, laboratory soils testing. Liquid- and hazardous-waste Hydrogeologic investigation and preliminary Confidential processing plant, Palo Alto, site characterization. Involved site moni- California taring, water sampling for volatile organics and organics, and modeling of contaminant transport. Sig 1. 1=1 LJ L.,J L-.! L-1 L --I L. _J L . -i L--a L--i L__J l—J L J L—/ LJ EXHIBIT "A" Supplement REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PERFORMED BY HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (continued) Name and Location of Project Services Provided Client Residential subdivision, Landslide investigation and slope-stability Pacific Gas & Electric Los Gatos, California study. Company Computer facility, Major hydrogeologic investigation for ground- Confidential Santa Clara County, California water contamination. Manufacturing plant, Santa Clara Major hydrogeologic investigation for ground- Confidential County, California water contamination. Industrial facility and Hydrogeologic investigation and site Confidential residential subdivision, characterization for ground-water contami- Sunnyvale, California nation. South Bay Center, Soil investigation for low-rise structure. Southern Pacific Land San Jose, California Company Hazardous-materials management Hydrogeological investigations, site Exxon Company, U.S.A. plans for 36 service stations, monitoring, and regulatory agency assistance. Santa Clara County, California 550-acre soil and ground-water Comprehensive multi-level aquifer studies and Major data processing contamination site, Santa Clara and design and implementation of aquifer company County, California restoration system. Cleanup monitoring. Jeanne D'Arc Manor Housing Soil investigation and dynamic response Jeanne D'Arc Manor Project, San Jose, California analysis. 1 ' EXHIBIT "A" Supplement Harding Lawson Associates FRANK L. ROLLO Vice President/Principal Engineer Mr. Rollo, HLA vice president, has over 20 years of management experience. In addition to serving as the director of the firm's geotechnical services, he is on the board of directors and is the principal in charge of HLA's San Francisco office. Mr. Rollo has worked extensively in the San Francisco Bay Area. He has managed the firm's Guam office and has experience with tropical soil and rock conditions. He has expertise in foundation engineering for port facilities and high-rise buildings and is experienced in working with lateral earth pressures, pile foundations, and advanced techniques of earthquake engineering. J EDUCATION M.S. , Civil Engineering (Soil Mechanics) , University of California, Berkeley, 1964 B.S. , Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1963 EXPERIENCE 1964 - present: Harding Lawson Associates REGISTRATION Civil Engineer - California, Colorado, Nevada, Guam 1 MEMBERSHIPS American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Northern California 1 Society of American Military Engineers 11 National Society of Professional Engineers J I I JEXHIBIT "A" Supplement JFrank L. Rollo - Page 2 Harding Lawson Associates REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Consulted regarding foundation support, including slope stability and liquefaction study, for the proposed 14,000-foot-long Knik Arm Bridge, Anchorage, Alaska. Client: Alaska Department of Transportation 1 Conducted detailed geotechnical investigation for planned Post/Mason Hotel J project in San Francisco, including design criteria for 80-foot-deep excavation adjacent to existing structures. Client: John Portman Associates Performed foundation engineering for five high-rise buildings on soft, sensitive soils, Embarcadero Center, San Francisco. Client: John Portman 1 and Associates Acted as principal engineer and project manager for geotechnical aspects of 50-megawatt geothermal power plants, Units 18, 20 and 21, The Geysers, 1 Sonoma County, California. Client: Pacific Gas and Electric Company J Managed geotechnical aspects of the India Basin Redevelopment Project, San 1 Francisco. Client: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency Acted as project manager for geotechnical studies at Diablo Canyon nuclear J power plant, San Luis Obispo, California. Client: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Conducted soil/structure interaction studies for hospitals and office build- Jings in various locations in the San Francisco Bay area. Provided foundation engineering and site response analysis for 25-story J high-rise built on soft clays, San Francisco. Client: Corwin Booth and Associates Performed foundation engineering for 35-story high-rise, San Francisco; pile 1 foundations gained support in sand below soft clays. Client: Southern 1 Pacific Company J Provided foundation design criteria for the Koror-Babelthaup Bridge, Palau. Client: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Acted as principal geotechnical engineer for copper reduction facilities, 1 Tenke, Zaire. Client: Fluor-Utah, Inc. Conducted foundation investigation for N-Reactor facilities, Hanford, Washington. Client: Norman Engineering Company _l 1 UI 1 EXHIBIT "A" J Supplement 1 Harding Lawson Associates Frank L. Rollo - Page 3 Performed geotechnical engineering services for 25-mile-long pipeline (39-inch to 96-inch inside diameter) and 3-mile-long outfall and support ] structures for interceptor sewer project, Alameda County, California. Foun- dation conditions included bay mud, high water table, and heaving sands. Client: East Bay Dischargers Authority and Kennedy/Jenks Engineers, Inc. ] Acted as project manager for geotechnical investigation of Saipan Inter- national Airport, Saipan. Client: The Ralph M. Parsons Company ] Performed foundation engineering for dock and high school, Kusaie Island, Micronesia. Client: Pacific Architects and Engineers ] Conducted soil and geological investigations for Diamond Heights Redevelop- ment Project, San Francisco. Client: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency ] Moen water supply study, Truk District, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. Client: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Performed soil investigation, including correction measures for landslide, ] for Hunters Point Redevelopment Project, San Francisco. Client: San Francisco Redevelopment Agency ] Consulted on the cross-island road, Ponape District, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. Client: Mackinlay/Winnacker/McNeil & Associates ] Investigated and observed roadway reconstruction after landslide, Lakeshore Country Club, San Francisco. Client: The Olympic Club Acted as project manager for geotechnical investigations for Inarajan- ] Talofofo Bridges, Sumay and Liyog Bridges, and Ilig River Bridge, Guam. Client: Government of Guam ] Evaluated Yap District Airport pavements, Yap Island, Micronesia. Client: The Ralph M. Parsons Company Acted as project manager for geotechnical investigation for Dau Sokels ] Bridge, Ponape. Client: Ponape Transportation Authority Conducted a liquefaction study to evaluate the liquefaction potential of ] loose, saturated sands during various seismic events. Client: City of Pittsburg, California ] Provided foundation engineering and site response analysis for 33-story office building, Gateway Plaza, San Francisco. Client: Southern Pacific Railroad Company ] Acted as project manager for geotechnical investigation of a $500 million compactor-compressor facility, Ain Smara, Algeria. Client: The Ralph M. l Parsons Company J 7 EXHIBIT "A" Supplement Frank L. Rollo - Page 4 Harding Lawson Associates J Consulted regarding foundation support, including lateral stability, for semisubmersible drilling platform, MacKenzie Delta, Canada. Client: Earl & Wright Evaluated several schools in San Francisco for potential geological hazards and foundation behavior during seismic events. Client: San Francisco 1 Unified School District Conducted detailed investigation of South Shore Marina site, Richmond, 1 California, and adjacent onshore commercial development, including founda- tion criteria and site response evaluation. Client: City of Richmond Performed investigation and site response analysis for new foundation on sand and rock, Children's Hospital, San Francisco. Client: Children's Hospital J Performed evaluation of rock slope stability and foundation support for residential development adjacent to old quarry, Wharf Plaza Development, San l Francisco. Client: BJW Associates J • 7 J I I 1 7 7 ] EXHIBIT "A" Supplement Harding Lawson Associates ] PAUL C. GUERIN Senior Engineer I Mr. Guerin has been responsible for conducting various aspects of geotech- nical investigations, including static and dynamic finite element analyses of earth dams, slope stability studies, settlement analyses, borehole log- ging, and pile installation inspection. He has conducted research in several areas, including the strength behavior of weakly cemented sands 1 subjected to dynamic loading, the modeling of soil properties, and the measurement of soil properties in situ using an acoustic cone penetrometer. He is currently developing a series of manuals for the design of lateral 7 forces on offshore gravity structures, piles, retaining walls, excavations, reinforced earth slopes, and buried pipes. 1 EDUCATION M.S. , Geotechnical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1982 B.S. , Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1981 EXPERIENCE 1 1984 - present: Harding Lawson Associates 1982 - 1984: Telegraph Avenue Geotechnical Associates, Berkeley, California, geotechnical engineer 1980 - 1982: University of California, Berkeley, research assistant 1 1981: Engeo, Inc., Concord, California, geotechnical engineer REGISTRATION 1 Professional Engineer - California REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Prepared geotechnical design recommendations for 24-story hotel and 33-story office tower, both with 40-foot-deep excavations through soft bay mud soils. 7 Client: Embarcadero Center, Limited Provided consultation and observation services during construction of 23- story hotel structure. Excavation for structure extended up to 70 feet through sands and rock requiring significant underpinning of adjacent struc- tures and excavation support. Client: Embarcadero Center, Limited 7 EXHIBIT "A" Supplement Paul C. Guerin - Page 2 Harding Lawson Associates ] Project manager for. large commercial development in San Francisco., Investigation consisted of 21 test borings and significant laboratory test- ? ing program. Presented conclusions and recommendations for site develop- ment. Client: Baywest Development Company Project manager during investigation of steep hillside site. Project in- 1 cluded 130 multilevel condominium units. Client: Embarcadero Development Company 1 Project manager during construction of 23-story office tower in downtown San Francisco. Provided consultation regarding removal of unexpected hazardous waste. Client: Continental Development Company Supervised field investigation and developed recommendations for design of 40-foot-deep excavation in San Francisco. Client: St. Francis Hospital 1 Project manager for preliminary soil study; provided preliminary foundation recommendations to aid in estimating site development costs. Client: American Can Company J Project engineer for foundation investigation on marginal bay mud site in San Rafael, California. Observed exploratory drilling, developed pile foundation recommendations, and estimated deformations of site under earthquake loads. Client: Treffinger, Walz & MacLeod J Project manager for foundation investigation and geologic hazards study for new school building in San Francisco. Client: San Francisco Unified School District Provided recommendations for foundation design for building additions at l Alameda Naval Air Station. Client: Jordan/Casper/Woodman/Dobson J Project manager for ongoing consultation regarding construction of auxiliary 1 facilities at Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, San Luis Obispo, California. Client: Pacific Gas and Electric Company l Project manager during construction of 19-story office tower located in J Santa Clara, California. Client: Maskatiya, Suri & Company Performed engineering analyses for design of pile foundationssubjectedto J extreme horizontal ice loads, Prudhoe Bay Unit., Lisburne development project, Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Client: ARCO Oil Company 1 Performed exploratory drilling and developed foundation recommendations for two-story auto dealership, San Rafael, California. Client: R.A.B. Motors, Inc. Conducted static and dynamic finite element analyses of proposed mine tail- ings dam for molybdenum project in Nevada. Performed with previous employer. I 1 • EXHIBIT "A" Supplement Paul C. Guerin - Page 3 Harding Lawson Associates Slope Stability Performed stability analyses of hazardous waste containment levees for EPA l permit application. Client: Hughes Aircraft J Performed steady-state seepage., rapid drawdown, and probable maximum flood _ 1 slope stability analyses for 130-foot-high embankment dam located at McLaughlin Gold Mine Project in Yolo County, California. Determined yield acceleration and embankment response to earthquake loads, and estimated 1 deformations of the embankment using Makdisi-Seed method. Client: Davy McKee Corporation Project manager for seismic bluff stability assessment for proposed court- 1 house, Anchorage, Alaska. Supervised cyclic testing program that included resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests on Bootlegger Cove clay. Per- formed Newmark analysis to determine displacements under dynamic loading. 1 Client: State of Alaska Project engineer for seismic stability assessment of 110-foot-high existing 1 embankment dam located in Napa County, California. Supervised field investi- gation, laboratory testing program, and review of existing data. Client: City of Napa 1 Designed reinforcement and conducted stability analysis for 80-foot-high Tensar-reinforced slope, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California. Client: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Performed static and pseudostatic seismic stability analyses for hazardous waste containment levees, Middletown, California. Client: Geothermal, Inc. 1 Performed static and pseudostatic seismic stability analyses for levee built over compressible soils, Port Sonoma, California. Client: Chart House Restaurants 1 Performed static and pseudostatic seismic stability analyses for large spoils fill at The Geysers, Sonoma County, California. Client: Union Oil 1 Company Conducted post-earthquake stability analysis for proposed northern California landfill to be developed over soft, compressible soils. Client: 1 Acme Fill Corporation Performed numerous stability analyses for large residential development in Danville, California. Performed with previous employer. 1 _ 1 `7 1 EXHIBIT "A" Supplement -1 Paul C. Guerin - Page 4 Harding Lawson Asglolates 1 Research and Development Developed slope stability program, TSTAB, to analyze circular-failure sur- 1 faces using Bishop's Modified or Spencer's method of analysis. Performed with previous employer. 1 Developed slope stability program, TSLOPE, to analyze noncircular-failure surfaces using Spencer or Morgenstern and Price method of analysis. Per- formed with previous employer. Studied several case histories of slope instability in Orinda formation to determine manmade and natural conditions contributing to instability. Performed with previous employer. _) Participated in development of three-dimensional soil model for conference in Grenoble, France. Performed with previous employer. 1 Conducted research to determine strength behavior of weakly cemented sands subjected to dynamic loading. Prepared artificially cemented sand specimens and tested specimens in cyclic simple-shear apparatus. Performed with 1 previous employer. Performed research related to measurement of soil properties in situ using 1 acoustic cone penetrometer. Penetrated 3-foot-diameter triaxial sand specimens to determine relationship among acoustic amplitude, grain size, confining pressure, and rate of penetration. Performed with previous 1 employer. MEMBERSHIPS 1 American Society of Civil Engineers Tau Beta Pi, National Engineering Honor Society Chi Epsilon, National Civil Engineering Honor Society 1 PUBLICATIONS 1981. Earthquake hazards for the Auburn Dam, California Engineer, Vol. 59, 1 No. 4, pp. 9-11. _1 1 7 1 S EXHIBIT "A" Supplement HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES Engineers, Geologists & Geophysicists CALIFORNIA 666 Howard Street, San Francisco.94105 Telephone: 415/543-8422 7655 Redwood Boulevard, P.O.Box 578, Novato 94948 Telephone: 415/892-0821 • Telex 340523 2430 Stanwell Drive, Suite 110, Concord 94520 Telephone: 415/687-9660 355A Tesconi Circle, Santa Rosa 95401 J Telephone: 707 /545-3291 15621 Redhill Avenue, Suite 100;Tustin 92680 Telephone: 714/259-7992 NEVADA 940 Matley Lane, Reno 89502 Telephone: 702/329-6123 I TEXAS 6220 Westpark Drive, Suite 100, Houston 77057 Telephone: 713/789-8050 ALASKA 601 East 57th Place, Anchorage 99518 • Telephone: 907 /563-8102 HAWAII 1259 South Beretania Street, Honolulu 96814 Telephone: 808 /537-3352 COLORADO 5580 Havana Street, Suite 5A, Denver 80239 Telephone: 303/375-0180 ] ARIZONA 120 West Broadway, Suite 340, Tucson 85701 • Telephone: 602/622-3060 9105 . . . . •.,..,.• • • '4 . : '• .1 i4 il• . I • °.t•/ ' • ' i, . • . l' i'.. -i•: • 4 , 1 . • ' • ,'41,..4..,:, • 1 , 'Ii. r1 i •vr:.•.,.'S.; EXHIBIT "A" b ,• • 4i • • ...a,. . .. •'-.1 re- :..35,.:::•t -t4;‘.. I Supplement ii-te. & 7 >I '''. . ft,:k, 7: • Ill I. • •.1 .. it ..... r -n•-• '••• 1 - "'a , • -c.V. '• 1.'1 ,....1: t,4: k... r-.J.,..i,', 5-& 1 ,,e,,F.11.0fi'•:,: -i • V. . 111 i •/..t..t.:1 . .. . -: i %It li .1113„,‘1 13, ....: 4.4/1111&iir:4.4,14:>.-.,• •'T.(7.'‘ ` .. 0 )....1 Si .1,‘ • :?I'tql •'Ilak 441.‘"le.‘I 1 7'ti! : 't...• v.?, , •i,calmi il t,.5“ • --•.1 i .1, ' IA ii,i-le4:7; ,:11/4'..V4: '•:•21 •• 4•• r: :44'-L41/2 t, n i. -• • ..i '..,-;6. ;1,1 4;1, • I . ,‘ -, 4 . ift-iik-.: • st_ '4- :4 It--.14.-. i it 4f,, tl .‘-‘10 • at.Y-•''.;,-i;A.:.1-. .k .t4 4 Ntr-ok: ,.1.. '' .T.,.., .., v ‘...,,,,S::...-zprt•vt :-. - ir... \I ..'irlirtil k -op '21. •• •• 71;1;4:S.ft, lif•;4.-: kj,t11;k. ;pati! 71 11.1 1 .:,••3 ' at .i• .., /A ..t,•• • : • - -e* ,, •,,..• ••!-',. • :4 „. "is ,,,,,,,'',.• -'•, , q .i•fr ii•friek,;I:‘• .:f04‘ 4 . ft:‘114.X..t.l...t . ' .‘ lit ‘` .3.t.cultj..1 5 . .' A '. • ..4 , -•... 0, -•/.1, , •.'• 't • ‘7'.,, i•...'7 it ! ‘S 41A .1 \I!.f•gieri^ljtr4-;:i .Ili 1';‘41..44-2-.7"47‘4.1f el%ft;V:a11,111 It . •30.i'..k. ; •cf.. k.,1/4 4 :4' n.% . • . R r. ii.;\ 1,,is( , •';`-',1A• 0 ,1.21: L • 0-bit 'r • ' ,,-., .. y 0.,:k1 .,1 it ..-51/4r. .:. .• ...L.• r-i ‘t 1 ..• n.,- a• 5, , , - .:. - if,z1,,, • •t ••• •t • ..;•-'1, .:14 .fit- • ":1•1141,';'. 7 'I' Ay ;‘, A.,: r • • ''. • i , . • • :- . • . Ai . .i .. . 11, 1%; 100 . i1111;• ,1/4.• ii id :g .fr• ,••-k•t‘, ',..i. 1 'e 1' .-• - .. •:;.......• 1.•it •--: fr., I ..i..4trti, 4 4 .t , .: ''‘.:-A . '?; e t. ,,k . . ., ?iv ...,,,,I,. cL.: t• • •:, 1 ). .i tr... .... ,, ‘ I* C 'ri-_,. , . ,,. , • -, . . :.•:titi • • .. 0 ,., t khrlys„,,,•11..• ..- 1,, II? v. . • . ; ''.44 !At 1 I. .•.- ,/,..41 71," - I, .4'. •al ,, r.3.,/ •ip- • t, - -, :it :•7‘ "ti .• -'` ,•••....4,1;gict,);.. .-\ •:•€ . . ,-..•• . - c , .....,...,....0„. ....,....r . 4 .• ...,.k,A,. . ... . „ ,o.. sici....itt:., .. _. .,..kst„. .0.1t .4.4 ,.... t 01,007, 'If: -.-ii 1.{ r'''c-4:-- .: •!cx. S • :11-';4 ,. , 10.• ' q • o,',FAVit_.. . .. .... tin. 'It. :o. t.• 1-4 • • .e.,,, VC- ;'1' ,..; v • -"it .9 :-.* c -ik\k, to ‘.;•:'/' A jiKA•.' . ....t.' reY/Imr.j.J.11 1 , ;1' • iy. •i, '• 0 , ',s'• 'flol :i.• l ,:•14 K .. ;?.0.4, b ). .. ,.,• ..t.,:at,,,,-,4% d .P.' . • ba'' I.,, ; - 1 1.* ' vis .1 V ••g XV*;.1.4041:11.• •b •kt ut is, b. I 1,1 s f. -4.'s C • . •:,• .;• • • it' • -:.•‘ 147.0tt• 4. `'..8. i `1 s . I .1? -Y ...... it‘1/2145FIV.:.1-4..41.. .4 i I 1 'i,.. 47,‘Ltit' .4".! *Et". ,tteNkr,• st‘p• ,... fig-...1v.'141:454144;dr.cl.,;‘) ... - ‘.(::: I . 1/2 -1/.. Iti y ..--!„.; ••••• . . ?T.:- • . t•Zr-,,... a., ..4A , ;iv cr,s ks; at' YL$0• 46 )1 •/.1-. .. :! N `. .i 4, k 2 ' •,..,W • ,...tak'- y7 1 .. • ' 4.t . er a v.rit4, .•;.-4r dr f '-..4,sw:\ .1_ . It:4, . _121-1::•..,.1:7".t.1.4.y1-4.1e1.174(it:, t. ...tc.....,!:4 .. • ....,A4773.,ci. , , .:ti:: 1 : ' ...--14 . r t:it'frcit_asi.- lZ-4' 4-1%„.44.its.(ikitsr..ii Lit:III:I.lt4(.1.1.1 ..,: -;lksit it::,...:Iti•w.t.:1.:.: 1.14 :;...13...11.c.‘...!.lt?: ...1..::::4,41:1 ‘ti ::?. 7..?;;PC., 71'ilstr: 1,1::: : 41:14441:::;:11... i 4 yA 1, ' ..4, ;t, :.. 1):. ).. .. :. . ..ii '?4..: 1 '... ' c •'di.. .11''k lit; f Air t 1/4? .y.4. _ y,r, 4 , . *tt: .. .4 , ..., :4./.. , ,,ii:) ,. ffit --:-; ,•:': ci , - • If•I. ) tt . Is ' ' ef cr.:E14;) .1 F ilic...C1;;t1. ..:• ...I'lf.:1;.1'it i I .1 kat ) . • 11 '.2::' SS g .::. ,.'t. k ...„...±4;,VN P-- ell 1 A ce..x; •,'P'.. e,111:;;;," :4 I ..iiru..;., - . 1 : . ...,t %iiiit4:‘ ' !Ls,- SAL.ii.s4.4.qii,-)ticeit. - Asiiib .r4,.4- A 11.), T I ..-.s. ,;":i:e :\\ft, .1?; ".;;:-‘ :::1:\\•i'. ' it4-:4S. ykL;,' ei%."1•41: *•:Litoi‘ ?-i•,* ;• ; %,t 1r ,t441?;13 ': - i. ''Z:/•:1*.k. A I.4.1:4 e. .4tie. .;:11,1.::. i v74';104 ;...!...t. s::.-1\--;.iii-k,,4 .. , . :•:?./.1444,ii„. . . 1,.*/ .,..1,4... ,44 Adi re 4. . .541,,i• .t, „....k.,,,• 4,..• .,tv,?•,, '.1.,c ...„..: i t,.. :,i, ,.!:‘,.,. 4 4 N ;• ..\,.-.. . .kx..., salt •.:-... - - • ? hil i_1 HAtibINO LAWSON ASSOCIMES i 44.., tFiTr.i '4.- :.,,, !le Ji3-•,.; ,;:,....,i, • -L.cii,• - - r 1 11.1;t:?,: '-+:4‘--'1 .VA; \- " r • • C •.4es. t A - '`V. Ca'ti 1(••%\t ‘ : 1`.., I-ILA established Its tint flay Area office In ke , \ .4 ' . ' •' •,-,-' l' "t;::..r:.- • I‘"11::: :' A\ ' ::c.1 - k"A- 5.`` 1 . k. "fr r 1 1 I931 otti es were later ci " ‘,"-Y•if: ',, i'ci i. ' ' ..• -tc-.....,... 4.., ;.',.., A)4N k%i an Milt ltd ti . C .. . 1 . .' .-S.\‘'•."IL ‘‘ r:-:• :'-'4'C'''''''"‘‘' `4'. I. Tht' ‘st f tit/tiled In tbilCbitil , d111.§ ROM Mid matin k; si i ... 1 • ..r tit. : !,1• I 4•. . IT'• . 1-.1. v •it.v....1 vt- : ' 0..).•0 .1 '03-41,4)1/41 ke.,. ;4,,; • \ „ .:4,p ::,”1:ezi:::;•,, :1 A.'. 4.1 r... ill,4.,.......,,:-.: • ,, . 1,.v)..-it County. the Hutt otters a tun range dr 'cc I-ig- ,I.' • 1,t•P'l 4 7 :e:$`111;,-.4;J:;'1.10.'7:)- .7 - i a-fc..;i:\:i4.tcY4.r•ii'((;Ft'S•,..4.1,::lj litottissIdnal capabllitles-S and founda- lf,-: N.141g. '''' . ' • 1. t /I = '. C -'1:\nit 4 tIon engineering, geology, geophysics, design _.,, :5,, ' •,‘. ,. • .,-p4 'f . i :le-:; /I . b • .;,. .1,"C',11' I '..1 ;1: 1,•V:77.-Z.:•‘.41 of earth dams and reservoirs, earthquake V. .k its ir• . .).‘,. .-. •y. .pa.... iw):.-.. 1.-, . • s . .• ki“ -• . '...'‘ii.';'??''':7: engineering, solid and hatarddus waste .1 I- I. • . -.. . - t g Arc -1-1-1.- .4' --• •-•,.-:,- •-• ...-1 management, and dredging technology. /.,,. ,t. ra.,, g. ' • • ? . ,c-.1'. :.•-• .0-fi' . :•‘`••. c, • . ..4 ••••.;," ' •.• .:"'lli,-•;• ' . j. •-: •-) .: :' :1,- ,,,•:; ;1' • . • .,*4.0 e •q • , 11 tir ' 4-1 i .. e i.. i .i Y• ''''- ki.t .t rc::' •')IV..: t . 1 .".•‘‘-:".• - ; 666 !Alward Street, San handset, 94101 :. 1 C :•1- . t- -M(1, 1 ..41.' -"••••i\-4::i lir r.A'.k,; i'.7 '': •••IN" .' l.S.1 1 a telephone: 413 / 141-8412 1 fet•I•••;114 *4, .• I.I.t7V• .-- R .ye f I'Vt';‘. .k- 1.,‘ , "...'‘„:!(•;•!;•••(". Z.1) . IC' r:Lfri.. ' 'V,Si 2-re: t3/4 '4 fc*?:\C\:i.:':*::;•i. • T it : .. .c 1410 Stanwell br., Suite Ito, Concord 94320 .c 41-t....f‘t•': ' ,f,t. •• 2. •,..,' 'AI k7( xi •‘ l' Lk±-t...,. .--*.c. ,' -, ii 1 t ,.. 44,..: , ;*,I telephone! 411 / 681-9650 1 .;114.1174vitydl1/27r•-• 'f . ç1 •'•,r-lkiii\ :•.:xcV•ii;y„774-11'...1,..kilAc.:4 ,:i ':!..4?, 155A tescofti tittle, SantalRosa 95401 '1-. tz 't•,:-L•sen-.-vsys.,-,-.- -71\.-. , . - `. •_;-- tsq ,ksa r " t Icohotie- 101 / i43-32.9 ; :- ,. z .z.,3.- :'.-.-cici Alt ,t,...74,- it ,-: • • e ' lib •,...,• I".....is:1.1. catir.;-,,A..),•,:tr.;..0i,,,AL St\'...i.‘. ..:,..4::;'... .41,),:k.'!Icktiti..4.1 ... ....4 1....'. . i 1N61.1 liletii4v9o4oti Boulevard, P.O. liok 318 re,. . •••• , ;5 • , .r. 4. 1\ k . -. • ...;.--", 4C. ks...:-..1.... 4 .1 ,, 1 • ' '6P•Ime4YIS "r-Likl't .1:).- ...:(1". . ..‘; AN .' 1-elev.:hit:me'. 415 ! 891.-0811 I telet .1401). . k • EXHIBIT "A" . • Supplement r ,�jf� t. no.6.4t .....i - 7. IF -.gyp %r ��a y�.. r, rr We t 1p(i We'•"111F11 17.1.11 Marsh deposits, deep compressible ri{:' '"' "bay mud" along the Bay margins, , 1i e ! err ' and hillside terrain susceptible to .. I" • • landsliding are some of the elements IT ,. of the complex local geology with ijl�IliilTiliii1Mi +F., - - which HLA's Bay Area personnel /'rri - :*weal ., are familiar. They also have exper- tise in analyzing the potential NLA provided complete geotechnical design for a marginal wharf, effects on local projects of the finger pier, and small boa( harbor at Yerba Buena Island in San numerous faults that cross the Francisco Bay for the U.S. Coast Guard. region. Santa• Ron % 9 O0 m F9F 2 FF r t ,. It, l t. 0 O _ t/ ,.fid ��•VI„ I . Zn •Concord 40 Oakland y9 O _ I,�:° ±e.: l .£I.. . ^- A. �/ • r San 990 .:.n •Fsenclvco t Sen ,� Jose 0 914, o9 The firm's work at The Geysers geothermal resource Om 4.., Cy area in Lake and Sonoma Counties has encompassed o 9p -0 slope stability and ground-water protection investiga- 0 -v-0 lions, soil and foundation engineering, and construc- tion testing and management. 0 . 1 EXHIBIT "A" r upplement .y �y+ ,x '- '� S Fir t v �� . t ' "taro � - c ., ;, c; Cl '.- , 1 .4 t ..,84:1‘.411%.— .r la "RA -1Specialists in earthquake engineering and seismology 1 provide services for projects in seismically active areas. 1 1' jt i 1 j 1 r, . ; , The Novato office serves as the t ' 1•I j"'j f' ! firm's technical services and admin- 1 t: "'t • Y +; .t- ;,� l •i+l,•�,'. 1 istrative headquarters. Specialists p,-� L i ''"' 1 from Novato are available to pro- "i ( . 4' ,, vide technical consultation for t L' r - = I. 1` projects performed by any other 1 : , ,- ` ,. r j I. ,. �(, HLA office. Y P 1I '� ,. 1,,,, `. y, s ki FILA's hazardous-waste specialists have performed investigations 1 at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Superfund" hazardous-waste sites throughout the country, including the Times a Beach, Missouri, site of contamination by Dioxin. I ` The Novato office performs all • laboratory testing for Bay Area 1 •, . t0"f projects and conducts special testing ' (0 for offices outside the Bay Area. • - . , �i�- . . . j �' � Here, a cyclic triaxial compression 1 r, • :� �� ! I test is being performed to evaluate • " ' % . soil shear strength for seismic � . : :. 1 1 I design. 1 i l �. iii—{ ' -. .-. ] l! - , ' 1 EXHIBIT "A" 4- Supplement =---7 i, ,. z4 �, ~°moo ' •. -•:M�1 rt.-,. Top: Larkspur Ferry Terminal, : " ' Hi' - % 1114116‘.:."1"1 a Marin County, California,for ,' 4 AAA. q_ Golden Gate Bridge Highway& - riff-- Transportation District. Center: _3'' ' Embarcadero Center, San Fran- I.'l_1 9 cisco,for John Portman & Asso- cia/es. Bottom: N-SERV chemical - processing unit, Pittsburg, California,for Dow Chemical - Company. I C. _(4 Some Clients and Projects = � CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO West side transport project (wastewater), Sunset t District portion PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 1 = • 11 4 - �e Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, San Luis Obispo 1 s County, California u . ie t w,. u• I- JOHN PORTMAN & ASSOCIATES and - iii / t. t�l . ROCKEFELLER/TRAMMEL-CROW ::' . �j LA„ '1 ,FT'- ', Embarcadero Center, San Franciscos 0 NO t mt {{ OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. q • .yds a 1! no Trampas Canyon Dani, Orange County, California -- --• n In nn nn ' EXXON USA ,• - ' In Ill . IP Benicia Refinery, over 20 projects, Benicia, California " ii All k p„. EAST BAY DISCIIARGERS AUTHORITY and if , q�ry� p�pt I KENNEDY ENGINEERS, INC. lit -.:1 .J in In' Iu Wastewater transportation project, Alameda County, 7.-..... ,t• '`r 41 .a '^I a ft, California �, - 4il11 PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY ' , , -- , Coaxial cable route: Utah state line to San Francisco 1'l •• A. Bay Area 1 --!. ARCO/POLYMERS, INC. .. ' Hydrocarbon project, Solano County, California LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY Over 100 projects, Berkeley, California - '14,x,14.-, r • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA f . `" Santa Cruz campus, Santa Cruz, California ` , BEAULIEU VINEYARDS n r r ir,eid a ..;.•0414• �- • `lora etc, l Beaulieu Winery, Rutherford, California ).rd":.,./.1.4.;.,:,. ,q` i r!' i - U.S° NAVY, NAVAL FACILI'T'IES ENGINEERING +/=)f" . ...__ �1 L `' 1r COMMAND, WESTERN DIVISION r< :ft ^ I r is - `- `;(Y�I Sanitary landfill study, Naval Air Station, Alameda, 4 t r' ..,� T 1 • I1(,y'•• California r grillir%Th16-1 Dredging technology study, Mare Island, California .. 1 _ . F .I . KELLER& GANNON and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF r ,j "^' sn ENERGY Flash radiography facilities, Lawrence Livermore 'S" — SIM ," • . ! ;l National Laboratory, Livermore, California : I I 1 r t I 4-1--.12 i ilill -. ' • EXHIBIT "Airlc, ti•• --.4`'{ Supplement J t - ,}y l?*.1 ede. \ I ' r , t9�14 ti:\ 67 n4 7 rs. 7 \ ' :1 .l 11 1 Richard S. Harding, Presi- HLA originated in 1957 and was incorporated in 1959. dent. B.S., civil engineering, --1------.2: The company has expanded geographically over the 1 University of Texas. Mem- 1 " •s\::—.-_.: years and has developed the technical staff required ber, American Society of • '• '-- — to serve clients' needs worldwide. The firm's adminis- Civil Engineers(ASCE), 11 - • j Structural Engineers Associ- ft._,F i,._�.. trative center is in Novato, California, a few miles 1 ation of Northern California north of San Francisco. Regional offices are located (SEAONC), Consulting .;.,, in Anchorage, Honolulu, Houston, Reno, San Fran- Engineers Association of 7 -•• cisco, and Tustin (Orange County, California). California(CEAC), Inter- Two additional branch offices serve northern ,1 national Society for Soil California in Santa Rosa and Concord. Mechanics&Foundation Engineering(ISSMFE), `1 Chi Epsilon, Tau Beta Pi. Registered professional engineer. ,1 Robert T. Lawson,Exec- ,r: .r utive Vice-President. H.S., f 4 civil engineering, University =! 1 , of Washington. Member, C 4 f I ASCE, SEAONC, CEAC, r - ylx Society of American Mili- . ' # . 4 1 tary Engineers(SAME). o ! Registered professional r. •--1 engineer. - )l"11 Ir. i : ' I I a HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES -1 • EXHIBIT "A" 1 Supplement L + • lo • ; , ..� r I . ' . ` I ito . Donald L.Schreuder,Man- Frank L. Rollo, Vice- Richard P. Prezio, Vice- aging Vice-President. M.S. President. M.S. and B.S., President of Finance and and B.S., civil engineering, civil engineering, Uni- Administration- B,S., ac- University of California, versify of California, Waltham,ng, Massachusetts. College, Berkeley. Member, ASCE, Berkeley. Member, ASCE, CEAC, SAME, ISSMFE. SEAONC, National Soci- Certified Public Account- Registered professional ety of Professional Engi- ant, California. Member, • engineer. neers (NSPE), and SAME. American Institute of Cer- • Registered professional tified Public Accountants, engineer, California Society of Certi • - fied Public Accountants, and National Association • of Accountants. 0 HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES - O WEEK. ENDING 11-6-83 UILLCII CIIG/ _- ,.� RCpOitlCUARGLS TO DATE BUD 0 OPEN JOB SUMMARY CURRENT O7HE0. TOTAL t0 DATE BUDGET 0 JOB no. DESCRIPTION ._ . .EON NG0. AUTH-OPTS LABOR PAGE OOL van ^O-^' Tr RECEIVABLE -- - CHP ACCOUNTS O ACTIVE • TRRA INCA BCN EI AGE ANALYSIS OF °nom H3 00201 077 01 DATE 02-10-83 30 OPVS sN�MARY 00 001 NB 06-16- 0 CURRENT PERI 1UT nl 0 Q BALANCE PRODUCTION GRnt10 O 0 PSSOGI AICs OVERSEAS �'0 DESCRIPTION G LAWSON ALL OFFICES HDUSION I 0 Q nCGOUNT N0. - UARD IN• LOS nNtiELES •'.. - ALASKA Q D n� HAWAII --------------- D RENO I— n ASSOCIATES Q 0 Q �. Q 11PRDING 03_12-83 0 END RIG • >•'D pEP1Op CNpIND WEEK ItIC Q [ O Q 2 O ENGINCERS• Y 0 R DETAIL REPORT DOE HOWARD . INnal i� O J08 CLIENT 1296-_,..A. ENGINES NOVATO O 0 O 2. PHIS 0 Z, O MATERIAL NO 030 D6 SUMMARY TIME REPORT - 00845 - .,nu cern I1V 0 0 2, Q p DRAFTING• O JOB _ 09 25 83 TOTAL W. O • WEEK ENDING OF OTHCR OTA L CHHOG 0 2, VEHICLES stGK EO 0 O VAC COMP O 02 I,W HOL 02 oO 2�. 0 DRILLING 0 SO.SC 02 0 7,• pg POSTE O 0,00 0.00 50.51 O 02 O 0 OTHER ACTIVE PERSONNEL 0,00 0,00 OO.�U 0.00 124:Qp 508.5' 03 7. ODUCi ION T Q Q (10 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 96.00 11.5 n 03 O 3•e O PR unt PEEK !tau 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 - ?;'qD ,c n0 11.50 11-` • 4-. ;gig."... JI tits EXHIBIT "A" ,t 'i X -'21':' - Supplement . . -2-m• • ;i-"" • 1 ?I 1 11) • • i ; 1 4� 4' Frank C. Kresse, Principal Jerome S. Nelson, Principal �, ��? �� 1•1 Geologist. B.A., geology, Geophysicist. B.S., geo- ® d University of California, logical and geophysical — • / { Berkeley. Member, Geo- engineering, University of 1_"'t_ - - logical Society of America, Minnesota. Member, San 1 - Association of Engineering Francisco Bay Area Geo- r ��"'':f. Geologists(AEG), Seismo- physical Society, Society of .�/ i. logical Society of America, Exploration Geophysicists, i National Water Well As- AEG, European Associa- t ' sociation. Registered tion of Exploration Geo- • t geologist and certified ` " A B physicists, and International Timelyaccounting informationprovided engineering geologist. Society for Rock Mechanics. d thoucpteto manage- engineering geophysicist, men!and to all offices through computerized data registered geologist, and processing performed in the Novato Service Center. certified engineering geologist. 1 • a _' ^" I. 1 , tt : 1 � ' -ISI+:,t _ f i �•, r _ ait , • la ` _ a : i. 1 f ��t sty : I .1. , . PAGE 0 p\ ----- ' 0 II -,.� �.' fit .r. .._. , r Y i em- .: �1�. / '. -1 PAGE 01 ..+�° - "-., •,� (It VAC SICK ° N'G-s. r `'..t„ l III s 4 O NLA's stockholders are full-time employees holding positions of responsible charge 1,.5050 0.00 t •so 1 54 and active in professional practice. 0.00. 0 20.02 .00 0.00 201 .680 O 0.00 0.00 2.40 1.54 40 1.24 M.00 0.00 2. �n.00 0.00 8.48 242.26 O . __ i ¢e a EXHIBIT "A" I Supplement 11 • 1 r . .: i, li.: • g.. P n c. •i , • kt \ . 'W' Is a 111 / dill • 4� � \ R l ,t, , 1 I t., • . a: 'ilk. r; 1 .\ ' . \ :\ iff44 ;:\ ,.. \,,,s, fil •i ... , ,. .i. I:tioa: . , iik.i rit . •17' ----a. Alla .ilite• ' jal �� i' . ' � ,.: : • !y 1, / 1�illr• ,� rkieel —\ q ' • Y 5 • . `• 44 4°r. .4111Saiada Checking instrument calibration is an important part of quality assurance. HLA's Quality Assurance Program is administered from the Novato office the firm's Director of QualityAssurance.of 0 The program encompasses all aspectsr HLA's quality control program and meets A` O the standards of the nuclear industry. ` O i Jt " - ( Fund ' Oliver E. Merwin Scholarship In March of 1976, HLA established the z, Oliver E. Merwin Scholarship Fund in �' memory of an early principal member • of the firm. The fund provides financial ., I;, IA assistance to students in the disciplines sciplie geology, geophysics, "d� i i e I of soil mechanics, ement a[ �;, seismology, and business manag ; l accredited U.S. colleges and universities. EXHIBIT "A" • HARDING LAWSON ASSOCIATES supplement Harding Lawson Associates applies the 111111% relatedoundioniengin of soil mechanics and a�`0� foundation engineering during the design and construction phases of many kinds'of projects. In a typical soil and foundation engineering 0�s?Ar .`n9 investigation, HLA personnel collect surface •`*Se�n 6cjt` ` - and subsurface soil data, evaluate the physical `_ properties, ndand engineering il- at parametersesign oto the �Q t® ®IP site, and develop soil-related design criteria and plans and specifications. S& �� • . a Braced ercaration, Enrhareadero Center, San Francisco, California. {c' Rf ; •��_ ,�mi. ,AuI ��` \ - �y s\1. :. 1'.` ,\= �1•t1 = _ _ !J !' • • ' �'3`r- I .I ' �� <_ _ A 1 ." ... IIS r•-1 -t I\'!f 1 ill t yl es �t IIIUI��I�III�I��1 ' ii: ..`1r 4 4 kw r i.t i - . ... -4k `.› ' thiel/ . L 'y t' r I t' .- . rpti n• . I •p I _ , yeal.ai. ,' .1 t n•,i • %� „. • - A tl .'.< III ,i 1 %i/.� , y., 1 r irtA E3/4 r✓ J_ Sb'%/ •f a.. c I 1—'" 1 � — rI•4,1 {ytz f _ 1111 "'" 1 ., EXHIBIT "A" • Supplement 1 t• Foundation Design t Criteria HLA provides foundation i design criteria to meet site k conditions and structural re- quirements. We evaluate and r � t A kr' develop criteria for all types a- r � y foundation systems subject I, µ= '{' t ' 111 I ` t static and dynamic loads, "°, '_- 4— .' - AI b ranging from shallow spread itY, �.• �P,5 % footings to deep pile (ounda• • tions. We also analyze off- ct• • ' .� •-. •' - 4 . shore structures for vertical T„ t t.-. -, /r .......,i.. , , -• . r --.-; capacity and resistance to at a;. , - eral loads. Computer model. s�> ,` i , , 11 I I_' I I" - ing, field instrumentation, kJ Illi I i I P. other effective techniques a• ,;1' . used to design and evaluate foundation performance. First concrete island drilling structure in Alaskan Beaufort Sea, being readied for oil exploration. Retaining Structures ® 1 U HLA designs temporary . I n ' . - and permanent retaining I ' i I —* _ .4 e, { i • structures for excavations. Bral typescing ing and of Zo1eN 1.1 , < t ;i1 • In i�mn, , /iv i-_ 1 s;tl 1: ll • f'Hi ', :TI shoring alternatives are I • - , , I _ I. evaluated to determine ' ` I ` which system is best suited •'•-I:* i a. I, . . I t I i to the site and excavation �' C conditions. Construction ( materials are selected for - - compatibility with sub- _ "• f---4 conditions. I I- ISI 4+1 r11/ !:121.'•NiZiiTi, t. 1.M -Ai 41. • lfits - %ia Np - 10 t; .*\%y : •alp •1 ;oft, a'. e "" 41.. . /' ! r I I C -- Placement of tiebacks and installation of underpinning, Ramada Renaissance Hotel, San Francisco, California. • • EXHIBIT "A" - Supplement Soil Dynamics and > . Earthquake Engineering The disciplines of soil t p r dynamics and earthquake en- .+ °=� ,q*s` z gineering have developed in I IIIIIIII I Ir I �: response to the need to iden- T- r..,,._c, tify safe sites for complex i' "r 3 structures in active seismic areas. HLA's capabilities rela- — tive to these disciplines include • Seismicity studies • Analyses of liquefaction1. . potential - ■ Site-response studies • Soil-structure interaction " '•, analyses Diablo Capeon Nuclear Power Plant, near San Luis These capabilities have been Obispo, California. . applied to projects that in- volve offshore platforms, earthen and tailings dams, bridges, tunnels, tanks, and vibrating machinery. Slope Stability HLA analyzes natural and embankment slopes using state- of-the-art methods. We have developed computer codes for ,�•''`� static and pseudostatic anal- ..'.r\` yses. Sophisticated two-and '� :�\ z three-dimensional finite- ,.'. `�i�`� element methods are used to compute slope deforms- We et. tions under various loading conditions. Y(t) z 0 P w 0 E Ij U 0 Finite-element model TIME(sec) of embankment with earthquake time history. EXHIBIT "A" Supplement ♦' • �„ i .� - t f I • 41 -.n Construction Services } , • :y r HLA's construction services t u , . ,- include field and laboratory ... ,. testing of materials, testing eM .::-:• for compliance with specifi- r per ."--, I. t ! ��' #' •� � � y.. cations, surveillance of 3: �` • ' .10 , foundation installations to y, „�1 ', a \4. verify conditions, and bud- da $ ;'K`«".,' ?, -- ',' , 1 '. get and schedule monitor- y 'i<f l ti, ---- .1:.1/41.4.', ), ” - ing. The firm also provides i ' r ti n j. A r, , a da° , ` ' ' ' construction management t $i. is' '�: it.' ,t�' tr�j•' 9. for large earthwork 3 3{ , 'a 1d f , • i..t F projects. �. .. �,. � � . ; .. 5c , :, a- Observation of drilling Jor cast-in-place piles. 1 w - m E EEE :in �� y =- E1 ii '!11a.LIs M; .R - IP. - • 111 !--ir 5_,e: t_ _._ llemmetercenter, Honolulu, ;• .: ...• .. , „- <-,-+.- Hawaii(left); Greenway Plaza, '� - v'•' ' Houston, Texas (below, left); and •" ' 't'' " • `:;k MGM Grand Hotel, Reno, Nevada '" ' c • fig. (below, right). k. , 4 ., :u+ air,-, K r - .t. i' i G ' i+ a _ hi-' .. - i016,14 Iy ill 2-4 ' • 4 ,. I ski; � t .a,,� J Y . i,+`1 + , . i t-:.....2, II .�. Ste' 13-4 ,fit `C' -- Pt I i : 1.l tar F' , Plea. - torr iI ii...er� •---- —• ..---•- • • .. . . 7."' • '7111'=ir-_ ..":";• -t-- i...... ,--. _. ...,- .i.• • L....1; ,.,. __:-. - - . „ _.,.,, .,,.._,....._ .5 ...-.!.,.‘ ...• ., - -...tcr• a r.cr if?' - `. c-r - • -- ':'7'Fr-•••P ; '7" -tir“ -- ' SI '' r ' ••.; s: rt..; - . ' . . p, . ...I. .: ... ; I .a 1:- • . . • . . ' • ., . . : . . . . . ' . . ' . - .• . ' . • , • . , - , ' .. • - - . . . . . . ' . .. • , . • . . • • • . ' _ - • . - . ..: . . . - . , — - - . - ' • . - -- --- . . • . . • ' ' - ,. - • • • ' • . . , .- - ' • - . . ' . ' - -. • - - - -• -. -- • • . -. . - -- • ' . .. • . - . 1 • .. • • . . •, . • • • , . -• . - ' - . - • . . • • •" " • •- -- - „ . • . - ... • .., - - . ' . - . . . . ' . . . ... , - -. • - - - • . • :.' _, • - - -- .--. . . ... - .- - -- • ... • -1,-.. . - , . -. . - • : '- ' . - -- - , , , - .. . : . . - • - - --ia.• •• r r: 'r1- - - •, -. • - .. ... . .... •- •.. • - . -, ... , •. • • -- -• . . c•-.-- • 5..7 ''-''' - - .. • ' . '•- • , .,—. . .. .- .. ,.- - . ' ' • - - - . - . . ... . - -. ' . ' , $ • .. . , • - ' - . • - ... . - • • ' . - • • • •.. • . : ,e r.v.ii -7-) ” ' • . - . . . 7:-.71.-.4-r•27.'„ . 4 5 .7:-. .1'. •. .- •••.; L.'•• - . . • - 7' • T. i' . •- .-- . , . . . -. . .• . • .111 . - .: • • ' • - • ' 91 - .4. .r" . ‘f .4' : • . .... /...., . ,, - . •. . ' • .. • . • • • . . . • • ' . • . . • - - • • ' . . -. .-- • . .. _ . ''' : • - • . . . . • .4 -. . . . 4''4 •••• 1: . ' - . • ; .... 1 • ' • •7- 4-:' . . - - • - . .. .. - -.‘" • ''' i -- . . f. , •.,.. -: • , . , . . • - . • . -. . . . . . . • • . . . . . • ' ' , • 7:- :' '1: 7 . . „ . : . • ; • • ' . • s.• -1 H. J. begniikalli A§§neitite§, tftginenti . I . • • ••,. , ..: . . . . .. , . . . .. .__ ...• • _. • • . . ,-...-.1. I a 0 I t ‘lii 0 • 11 I I . . - ._ .. • - . 1:11 4 1.• •,....-. • . .1 • • ..- .. ' ..,. ?.,... --t 7 ....T...,; ...,;:::4.".14-i`-F1"; C-I'':•"•7' _ • • 350 Sansome Street Sone 500 • EXHIBIT "B" San I1 ai1CI$Co,CA I 91104 • 415392-6952 H.J.Degenkolh Associates,Engineers • A California Corporation Degenkolh niac6cmg in the brawl field of Structural Bupueemig Henry J.Degenkolb I! Mantas D.Wosser • R Guidon Dean f •. December 16, 1985 Loring A,Wyllie,Jr. Ted J.Canon City of Cupertino George E.Greenwood 10300 Torres Avenue ChnsD.Poland Cupertino, California 950.14 David R.Bonneville it Attention: Bruce Donohue, City Engineer Reference: MERCEDES TANK REPAIR Gentlemen: We areleased to respond to P p your Request for Proposals for evaluation and recommended reinforcement of the City's two 2.0 million gallon water tanks and their foundation systems. We have assembled the highly qualified team of H.J. Degenkolb Associates, Engineers and Harding • Lawson Associates, Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists. H.J. Degenkolb Associates, with forty-five years of experience in structural engineering, has maintained an active interest in all aspects of earthquake engineering, an interest that has taken us to all parts of the world to personally examine earthquake effects on structures of all types, including fluid storage tanks. Our foundation design experience • {" goes well beyond the normal foundation design associated with buildings. It has included shoring and bracing of deep excavations and exposed embankments, special underpinning, heavy machinery foundations and ; �; protection of buildings against effects of tunneling. `ii: As background information, we are attaching a copy of our mini-brochure and our supplements, "Experience in Earthquake Engineering", "Summary of M... Experience - Steel Fluid Storage Tanks" and "Summary - Shoring and Deep Excavation Projects". Our firm has worked closely with Harding Lawson Associates on a number of projects. As geotechnical engineers, they have had a great deal of experience in connection with liquid storage tanks and have provided services on many projects in Santa Clara County. Of particular ' . significance is their evaluation and recommendations for remedial work for protection of the water supply tanks at the IBM Santa Teresa Laboratory, San Jose in 1978. The experience and qualifications of Harding Lawson Associates are presented in the attached brochure. • • • ,i 8 ' I EXHIBIT "B" • H.J.Degeskolb Associates,Engineers Page o SEE EXHIBIT "A" Decembe 16, 1985. We have revi- ed the report prepared by Cleary Consultants, Inc , in which the prob em has been defined as one of differential set, ement resulting from ong-term consolidation and creep, accompani- . by seasonal fluctua ons. it appears to us that there are th ee issues in need resolution ° Differential se lament of the tanks as a result of consolidation y//bf the fill. • "/S1ope stability, inc. uding earthquake effec 's. ° Evaluation of the tank tself and its an. orage for response to earthquake forces. We propose to perform this work - n two p•ases: Phase 1-a. Review and evaluate : 1 existing data and assess the slope stability usin .resent-day technique. -b. Evaluate the tan struct re for earthquake forces, examining in pay icular a tendency for buckling and any anchorage requirements. 1 ' • -c. Develop a16‘rnative solutions :nd identify the risks associatd with those solutions for: 1. elevelin g of the tanks. i.4j'• ; 11 (11;1 2. Providing slope stability, if rLquired. /3. Reinforcing the tanks, if required {It'Et . Summarize findings in report form and revi-w with the ;; ,;' City. y. L. HI' N;, Pha 4 2-a. Obtain City's agreement for recommended scheme I . (. +« ' ,ai -b. Prepare design documents and t4� provide construction review. ,., ( 4 • EXHIBIT "B" H.J.Degenkulb Associates,Engineers Page Three December 16, 1985 We propose to provide our services in accordance with our "Consulting Engineering Services, General Conditions and Compensation" copy enclosed. We will bill monthly on an hourly basis, with non—salary j • expenses charged at cost plus 10%. After completion of Phase 1, it may !; be possible to establish a fixed fee for Phase 2 services. We are available to start this project immediately upon authorization and we estimate that Phase 1 could be completed within one to two months. We appreciate this opportunity to present this proposal and we look forward to meeting with you to discuss it in greater depth. Very truly yours, H. J. DEGENKOLB ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS Thomas D. Wosser President TDW/dq enclosures ,Ar 1 YL.•..1.. • i.i ge Ir+ . f• :' P } N 3r :� • w EXHIBIT "B" H.J.Oegenkolb Associates.Engineers A • SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING H.J. DEGENKOLB ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS fl.7. Degenkolb Associates has been practicing structural engineering for forty years, including the design of buildings of all types, utilizing all of the normal used materials of construction. Our prime objective is to serve our clients in the highest possible degree of professionalism, providing the best advice and the most appropriate design in a timely manner to meet agreed upon schedules. To that end, each project comes under the direct supervision of one of the Principals of the firm from the beginning to the completion of the work. From the beginning of its practice, the firm has had a very strong interest in earthquake engineering, based on an awareness that designing • with an understanding of the performance of materials and of building response to seismic activity will produce structures with a much lower . exposure to personal injury or property damage. That philosophy has led to a continuing program of self-education in the field of earthquake engineering, including world-wide on-site observations and evaluation of every earthquake of significance to modern construction since the 1952 earthquake in Kern County, California, up to and including the 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Over the years, the firm has been in the forefront in the advancement of the "state-of-the-art" techniques including the application of "dynamic analysis" procedures and the development of seismic resistant structural systems. Particular expertise has been developed in the area of computer applications to problems of structural analysis and earthquake engineering. Throughout its history, our firm has prepared seismic evaluations for major institutions, such as the University of California, the United ;44i.:2!J . States Navy, Pacific Telephone, IBM, the State of California, the 45'W; General Services Administration, and the Veterans Administration. The '•;q< ultimate goal .of a seismic evaluation program is to reduce hazards which have been disclosed to an acceptable level of risk. Normally, the first consideration is to minimize the exposure to personal injury and provide 0 for life safety. However, in the case of hospitals, certain functions, !: , such as computer facilities, and emergency buildings, it is often .f ;i important to provide an even higher level of performance in order to maintain their crucial functions in a time of natural disaster. In • ?. - recent years, there has been a greatly increased interest in damage :'= control and bracing of equipment and non-structural items in.order to "painimize business interruption and maintain operations that are critical A.td '1441 financially or socially. 43 $4 . • ..nr 1 65*F O KJ.0penkoibAssociates.Engineers EXHIBIT "B" Experience of H.J. Degenkolb Associates in the broad field of earthquake engineering is extensive in the following general areas: I 1. Design of earthquake resistant buildings. 2. Development and review of building codes. 1 3. Investigation of earthquake damage. 4. Seismic risk-evaluations of buildings and other structures. • • 5. Seismic investigations, studies and reports. i 6. Seismic strengthening of existing buildings and systems. The strength of the firm lies in the in-depth experience of its 4i professional staff. Henry Degenkolb, a member of the National Academy of Engineering, has served as a consultant on earthquake matters to the U.S. Office of Science and Technology, and has been a member of the State of California's Seismic Safety Commission as well as the U.S. Geological Survey's Earthquake Studies Advisory Panel. Mr. Degenkolb • and staff members are active in the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute and the Seismological Society of America, and have presented numerous professional papers on earthquake engineering at meetings of these and other professional societies. r Euilding Design - ¢ The design of earthquake resistant buildings is based on structural • - engineering criteria that are entirely different from those used for '- ' other structures. Earthquake resistant design must deal with exceedingly complex dynamic forces, and must develop structural capabilities to withstand deformations and stress levels beyond code-stipulated elastic limits. While controlled by building codes as a minimum requirement, earthquake resistant design is largely dependent kA:. upon the experience and judgment of the structural engineer. The V:: p mary consideration in earthquake resistant design is one of life *; ,,; safety. However, protection against property damagebuilding ' Ss';;' interruption should be commensurate with the Own 's understanding, the 'Vt'"' use of the building and costs necessary to mitigate the potential loss. 5"'' _Code Development - "'"" An active participation in the development and review of building codes 1f1 by members of- the firm constitutes a unique background and provides a Zii.iSound basis for evaluating codes and recommending appropriate safety �q ir, standards. pc1.17 1 ,.?. . p t • EXHIBIT "B" H.J.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers • • Henry Degenkolb was a member of the Joint Committee on Lateral Forces, which was established in 1948 to evaluate the current understanding of wind and earthquake forces and to draft model provisions for building codes in California. The work performed by that committee became the basis for the Recommended Lateral Force Requirements of the Structural Engineers Association of California. These requirements have been adopted by the Uniform Building Code, and have formed the basis for earthquake codes throughout the world. • • That document has been under constant review, and members of the Degenkolb firm have been active in this work. The firm's President, Thomas D. Wosser, served on the California committee from 1972 through 1974, and Vice President, Loring A. Wyllie, Jr. , served from 1975 • ' .' through 1977. Further participation bymembers of the firm in the development of ��•. P P<, building code provisions has been through numerous technical affiliations. Henry Degenkolb is a member of the Building Standards Commission and the Board of Examiners ( a code appeal board) of the City of San Francisco, and an active participant in the Committee on a Standards of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Loring Wyllie is I° a member of Committee 318 of the American Concrete Institute, which maintains the code for concrete construction in the United States and other parts of the world. Tom Wosser is a member of ASCE's Executive Committee for the Technical Council on Codes and Standards. Members of the firm also have been active in other code efforts, including the Building Code Committee of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, California's Building Code,Advisory Board of Historic Structures and the development of ATC-3. The firm also has been involved in developing new high-rise-building fire safety requirements for the State of California. (. Earthquake Damage Investigations - The firm has conducted investigations of earthquake damage in North and South America, Europe, Africa, and the Far East. Members of the firm have actively participated in earthquake research including on-site surveys and studies of actual damage resulting from earthquakes in Kern - County, California (1952), San Francisco, California (1957) , Anchorage, Alaska (1964), Seattle, Washington (1965) , Caracas, Venezuela (1967) , Manila, The Philippines (1968) , Santa Rosa, California (1969) , Manila, The Philippines (1970), San Fernando, California (1971) , Managua, q1) Nicaragua (1972) , Lima, Peru (1974) , Oroville, California (1975), Guatemala (1976), Italy (1976) , The Philippines (1976) , Argentina (1977) , Imperial Valley, California (1979), Livermore, California (1980), El Asnam, Algeria (1980), Eureka, California (1980) , Coalinga, '114,1California (1983), Challis, Idaho (1983) , Morgan Hill, California (1984) " j . and Mexico City (1985). It 4 OFF,, • G-G nl1 .::rr, ..,<: 9� EXHIBIT "B" • H.J.Degenkolb Associates.Engineers • . The following earthquake damage investigations and reports Were carried out for the identified clients: Coalinga, California, -1983 Report on Observations, Earthquake of May 2, 1983, Coalinga, California. This is an in-house report on the Coalinga Earthquake. Greenville, California, 1980 Report of Observations of Damage Caused by the January 24, 1980 Greenville (Diablo-Livermore Earthquakes. This is an in-house report. El-Asnam, 'Algeria, 1980 Reconnaissance and Engineering Report, Observed damage resulting from the earthquake of October 10, 1980, and participated in the preparation of the report. Client: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. .cr-•, Imperial Valley, California, 1979 ' ii. Reconnaissance Report. Observed damage resulting from the earthquake of October 15, 1979, and participated 4 partici in the preparation of the report. Client: Earthquake Engineering • •`iil;' Research Institute. Argentine Earthquake, 1977 Reconnaissance Report. Observed damage resulting from the earthquake of August 16, 1976, and • ; :�; q g participated in the • preparation of the report. Client: Earthquake Engineering pd`�k Research Institute. x•?of Italian Earthquake, 1976 * s�.• Reconnaissance Report. Observed damage resulting from the earthquake of May 6, 1976, and participated in the •C. preparation of the report. Client: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 1. Guatemala Earthquake, 1976 ; •.z'• Reconnaissance Report. Observed damage resulting from the ;'• earthquake of February 4, 1976, and participated in the preparation of the report. Client: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. • • 4 _F�n1 • EXHIBIT "B" H.J.Degenkoib Associaies,Engineers Field Investigations. Conducted detailed post-earthquake field investigations of three 15-story buildings (Reforms Oblesico, El Cortijo, and Torre de Santa Clara) and presented reports concerning the extent and effects of damage. Client: Grupo Insa. Repair and Rehabilitation. Proposed repair schemes for a severely damaged 11-story building (Edificio Cruz Azul) and a 10-story hotel (Camino Real) , and presented recommendations concerning types of analysis for use in rehabilitation design. Consultant to Ing. Juan Jose Hermosilla. Managua Earthquake, 1972 Investigation. Conducted detailed investigation of damage and developed schemes for reconstruction and strengthening of the 15-story headquarters building of the Banco Central de Nicaragua. Repair and Shoring. Recommended repairs and temporary shoring of earthquake damage to the 5-story Lang Building and the 5-story Banco de la Vivienda (La Salle School) . Repair and Reconstruction. Made recommendations for the repair and reconstruction of numerous low-cost housing units badly damaged by the earthquake. Consultant to Dr. Filadelfo ii Chamorro C. of Managua. Investigation and Dynamic Analysis. Conducted detailed investigation and dynamic analysis to identify the mode of failure of the Managua Service Station, which resulted in publication of the paper, "A Documented Vertical Acceleration i' Failure." Investigation and Repair. Investigated damage and designedrepairs and reinforcement to movie theatre Cine Cabreradamaged in the earthquake. San Fernando Earthquake, 1971 }' . Investigation of Damage. Conducted an extensive investigation of damage resulting from the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971, to the Balboa Water Treatment Plant and underground reservoir. Study included effects of ground motion and soil failures. ,S: �M1Sr ado. �` 5 . " H.J.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers EXHIBIT "B" .,. . • • ,-A• �. Investigation of Freeway Interchanges. Investigated damage to xyy., several freeway interchange structures which were heavily 14:i damaged and partially collapsed. Structural Soils Investigation. Participated in the i, structural aspects of a geologic-soils investigation of the Olive View Hospital site for the County of Los Angeles. , Client: Wooward-McNeil and Associates. y . Review Conditions of Retail Stores. Reviewed and reported on the post-earthquake condition of approximately fifteen retail • ,j.. stores in the Los Angeles area. Client. F.W. Woolworth _ ;. Company. 1 Caracas, Venezuela Earthquake, 1967 . ACReconstruction Reports. Prepared reports on proposed ' t reconstruction of two headquarters buildings following • £. earthquake damage. Clients: Mene Grande Oil Company, Mobil Oil Company. '71k` Ii , Seismic Risk Evaluations - The evaluation of the structural safety of existing buildings, with ,; . major emphasis on earthquake resistance, is a significant part of the • :t; practice of H.J. Degenkolb Associates. While many seismic risk {• evaluations focus on the life safety aspects of structural performance, 1; for certain facilities it is appropriate to consider the effects on -.: non-structural elements, some of which may be life threatening or their continued performance following an earthquake is essential. The nature #' of seismic risk evaluations can vary considerably, from a simple review itof the building with a subjective report based upon the engineer's experience through a detailed evaluation of design drawings and up to .1.2.. completely independent analysis, possibly using dynamic response 4, procedures with in-depth studies of seismicity of the site and 14: probabilities of occurrence of earthquakes of various magnitudes. This last procedure is often referred to as a Seismic Risk Analysis. '' A Seismic Risk Analysis attempts to identify the level of risk of a 'h . particular building or structure with respect to its seismic 1`' environment. The analysis has two major components: yt/, , 1. The seismicity of the given locale must be established in terms of ; %. the probability of occurrence, within a given time period, of 1,7 earthquakes which will yield specific ground motions at the given • `i '} site. There are many variables which must be considered, including , �'. relative locations of the site and affecting faults, length of i''. 4•'a: I J.. A.. 6 EXHIBIT "B" `, N.J.Degenkoib Associates,Engineers ;!14- active faults, historic rate of occurrence of earthquakes of various sizes on those faults, geology between the faults and the site and soil conditions at the site. The seismicity study /1,0 identifies buildings response spectra for design or evaluation, in addition to,projecting the probability of occurrence of earthquakes yielding specific ground motion. ktiA.; 2. The capacity of the given structure to resist earthquake-induced .t j ' forces must be evaluated to establish significant response ,,levels, w,'1 usually significant first yielding (the threshold of damage) and then the estimated level of a collapse mechanism. There are many til variables and many assumptions that enter into the evaluation ab: process, which normally relates the structural capacity at those •''`" defined levels to a peak ground acceleration. >.: Given the results of the seismicity study and the seismic resisting capacity of the structure, the two analyses can be combined to yield the probabilities of the specific building suffering r.•'r, earthquake-induced damage or earthquake-induced collapse over a given period of time. Damage Prediction - Damage prediction is becoming an important aspect of seismic evaluation. %" '` rP ,Industrial complexes, large corporations, financial. institutions, and P 8 various governmental agencies desire to know their exposure to damage in order to properly evaluate the impact earthquakes will have on their operations. While structural engineers generally are confident in . p;% statements regarding life safety aspects of seismic evaluation, because •'t: of observations of earthquake damage, we must maintain skepticism in our •; ability to predict damage for the same reason. Despite the constant advances in analytical techniques, the added insight from research work, IV and the lessons learned from actual earthquakes, the structural engineering community is still a long way from analytically correlating the building damage observed with the earthquake characteristics measured. ;,.f Damage prediction for a given facility is by far the most difficult task of any seismic evaluation. In order to reduce the uncertainty as much as possible, consideration must be given to the local site conditions, proximity to active faults, effects of various source mechanisms, { effects of focusing, direction of the strong motion propagation, degree of soil/structural coupling, as well as all the variables associated '�. with structural response. The lack of correlation that exists between # observed damage and damaged predicted by simple techniques demands recognition that there is more to damage prediction than response spectra, mode shapes and the allowable capacity of elements as we design ? them for new construction. A proper evaluation of performance of .. existing structures requires consideration of the strength and toughness of the available elements even if they are not permitted by the building %i4 codes. Accuracy is often limited because of the lack of performance information regarding outdated building materials and techniques. ...G;: H..1.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers EXHIBIT "B" u;; :*'r Procedures usedrintpredicting damage must recognize and report the ,, :i. assumptions involved and estimate the error-bound that is anticipated. ,ctte Examples of Seismic Risk Evaluations - Ei Mitigation of Seismic Hazards - IBM - San Jose Center. Reviewed ,CL anticipated seismic performance of manufacturing and research I equipment including computer floor systems and prepared • ', _ recommendations for mitigation program. E , Plutonium Building 332, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Performed in-depth seismic evaluation of the structure and non-structural elements affecting potential continued use of the facility. ?,;. L Hewlett Packard Mayfield Mall Project. Performed detailed "seismic i risk analysis" resulting in projected probabilities of damage and '-. ' collapse within a 50-year period. IBM Building - San Diego, California. Performed detailed "seismic ;i; risk analysis" resulting in projected probabilities of damage and rjr collapse within a given time period. 0: 3;- IBM Leased Facilities, Western United States. Conducted seismic QEF: evaluations of approximately twenty IBM facilities. d , r Appraisers Building, San Francisco. Conducted a complete evaluation of structural and non-structural components of the ' 16-story Appraisers Building, located near the original shoreline "'; on the edge of the Financial District. The structural analysis , - included modeling of the structural steel frame and concrete shear "r ; walls for inclusion in a dynamic analysis using several modes of raj vibration in response to the prescribed spectrum. The EASE2 14 computer program was used. 450-Ton Regunning Crane, Hunters Point, San Francisco. Conducted a z ,.,; completed stress evaluation of all members for vertical and lateral i , loads, in addition to an on-site inspection for evaluation of the r" physical condition of the 167x730x178 feet high structure. The N . lateral load evaluation was based upon a three dimensional modal response spectral analysis, using the STRUDL-DYNAL computer k.P; program. ?' Veterans Administration Hospitals. Structural consultant in a :x. �. ,; joint venture with the architectural firm, f' Vosbeck-Vosbeck-Kendrick-Redinger of Alexandria, Virginia, in the ;lit evaluation of the earthquake resisting capabilities of hospitals in IJ; -1 Salisbury, N.C. , Louisville, KY. , and Salem, Va. F.. • Iri lit 8 l4 H.J.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers EXHIBIT "B" Sandia Laboratories, Livermore, California: Reviewed existing :51 buildings to evaluate seismic resisting capabilities, and made specific recommendations for structural reinforcement, where deemed necessary. • ; .;‘7. Pacific Telephone Equipment Buildings: Evaluated expected seismic ' performance of equipment buildings. During the past ten years, • 1.•M; , some twenty buildings have been evaluated in a similar manner. University of California, All Campuses: Made seismic studies of ; ` all significant buildings, comprising a general seismic risk 1`475 evaluation of each building that included reviewing building 1. Y drawings and conducting on-site physical examinations. • ` Pitti Power Plant, Apra Harbor, Guam. Made a detailed seismic • structural analysis for the Civil Engineering Laboratory, Port Hueneme, California. Report included recommendations for . { i strengthening of the building and for anchorage of the equipment vc,'4 housed inside. Seismic Safety Study, Apra Harbor, Guam. Made a seismic evaluation of portions of the Naval Facilities in Guam. This report covered site geology, evaluation of all site utility operations (electrical, telephone, water, sanitary) including distribution ;l; ; lines and a rapid evaluation of twenty-five buildings. .• Pacific Telephone's Corporate rporate Headquarters, San Francisco. Conducted a seismic review of the 27-story headquarters building at 140 New Montgomery Street. Sonoma Valley Hospital, Sonoma, California. Evaluated expected seismic performance of equipment buildings. During the past ten years, some twenty buildings have been evaluated in a similar manner. Federal Reserve Bank, San Francisco. Evaluated the seismic performance of the former bank building on Battery Street and developed a reinforcement scheme. • 310 California Street, San Francisco. Made a seismic evaluation of this 8-story building for a prospective new owner. i; 1 550 California street, San Francisco. Made a seismic evaluation of this 12-story building and an adjacent annex for a prospective new owner. University of California, Berkeley. Evaluated potential falling hazards and developed mitigation procedures for South Hall, Doe j Library, Wheeler Hall. California Hall, and several other buildings. • 9 9 ski EXHIBIT "B" H.J.Oegenkolb Associates,Engineers fE, University of Utah Medical Center. Salt Lake City. Consultation on fi the seismic performance of this large facility located near an • active fault. it JL Seismic Investigations, Studies and Reports - c H.J. Degenkolb Associates perform special seismic investigations and : reports. The following are examples of this work: Natural Gas Project in Wyoming. Investigated the dynamic response 1 of over eighty structures to proposed underground nuclear explosions intended to stimulate the production of natural gas in Western Wyoming. The project for El Paso Natural Gas Company was 4 called Project Wagon Wheel. Redwood City, California. Investigated the Redwood Shore • development in San Mateo County. University of California, Irvine. Reviewed earthquake faults and made recommendations regarding building design. ' gi Tri-Cities Seismic Safety and Environmental Resources Study. '. � Developed the joint planning study for the cities of El Cerrito, 0=' Richmond and San Pablo. The State of California has designated 1 this study as a model for seismic safety elements of other communities. East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland. Developed seismic design criteria for facilities. Quito, Ecuador. Made engineering seismic studies of three different schemes for Edificio Cofiec (bank/office building) . I' Puerto Rico. Provided seismic design criteria consultation and surveys. Santa Rosa, California. Made a seismic evaluation of the Sonoma County Administration Building site. IBM Corporation. Established guidelines for the subsequent review and evaluation of all facilities leased by IBM in California, Nevada and Alaska. • %1 Seismic Safety Review of Proposed LNG Facility, Little Cojo Bay. California. Presented earthquake engineering considerations for analysis, materials and design details for the tanks, trestles and 1 other elements at the proposed LNG Facility. Included • ? 'i, consideration of dynamic analyses, damping values and ductility ;i.}, requirements, as well as horizontal force factors for various 5jr elements of equipment. .j:. 10 • -01' EXHIBIT "B" N.J.Oegenkolb Associates,Engineers Crane Toppling Study, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. Performed a • dynamic analysis of 50-ton traveling crane to determine seismic response and potential performance. r4 ATC-14. Developing standard procedures for identifying and ',�"$%! evaluating the seismic hazard in existing buildings. NSF funding through Applied Technology Council. Northern Telecom. Development of prototype and specific systems for seismic bracing of communications equipment. N�I. Seismic Strengthening of Existing Buildings and Systems - The following is a partial summary of seismic strengthening projects , performed by the firm: Naval Hospital Oakland, Oakland, California. Modification work for F '5..,• the Naval Hospital Oakland is scheduled for construction in MIO; 1984-85. The work is comprised of the complete seismic strengthening of the existing nine-story building, compensation work required because of the strengthening, and correction of tl' . various fire, power and HVAC code deficiencies. The Degenkolb office is the prime professional responsible for the entire "q: project. Budget for the basic work is approximately $30,000,000. 'It' Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center, Oakland, California. The Henry t, . J. Kaiser Convention Center (nee Oakland Auditorium) was • t'",;: constructed in 1914. The remodeling and rehabilitation work, being completed in 1984 includes p general modernization, new 75,000 square t: foot framed slab in the basement, new esplanade and entrance structure, repair of distress caused by differential settlement and seismic reinforcement. Cost of the work is in the order of $10,000,000. Campton Place Hotel, San Francisco, California. The rehabilitated Campton Place Hotel was opened for business in the fall of 1983. Two, approximately 70 year old, out-of-date buildings, one a sixteen-story steel frame building and the other a seven-story reinforced concrete building, were completely gutted and fully modernized to create a luxury hotel on Union Square. The work included complete seismic strengthening to the force level of the fcurrent San Francisco Building Code. Cost of the project was approximately $15,000,000. is •r 11 . • a r :L' EXHIBIT "B" N.J.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers Oakland Hotel, Oakland. California. Rehabilitation of the Oakland -^ Hotel began in 1979, converting the seventy-year old hotel into a '' senior citizens residence center. The building is a nine-story, U-shaped structures with concrete floor slabs on a structural steel <<h frame and unreinforced masonry exterior walls. Rehabilitation work included all construction of seismic resisting shear wall elements in connection with the stairs and elevators and "Basketing" of the .' ' exterior masonry walls. Royal Stanford Court Hotel, San Francisco, California. Built in 56,; 1915 on Nob Hill in San Francisco, the Stanford Court apartment building was converted a a modern luxury hotel in 1972. While the structural shell and basic architecture were retained, the conversion included new dining rooms under the building, major underpinning of existing column footings, addition of a new elevator and stairway system and strengthening of the entire -'` building for increased earthquake resistance. tN Balboa High School, San Francisco, California. Balboa High School .ori • consists of several two and three-story classroom structures, an auditorium, a major gymnasium and an athletic field grandstand, built between 1925 and 1930. Rehabilitation work was performed in the mid-1970s to meet the stringent seismic code requirements of the State of California. Bracing of Piping for Seismic Forces - IBM GPD Plant, San Jose, California. Evaluated all piping systems within a 200,000 square foot manufacturing plant and provided construction documents for seismic bracing systems. Boric Acid Plant, Stauffer Chemical Company, San Francisco, California. Participated in the rehabilitation of the entire plant, including seismic strengthening and reinforcement of deteriorating masonry walls and floor framing, all while plant operations were maintained. y • •s' Pacific Telephone, Santa Ana, California. Reinforced the existing five-story steel frame, brick enclosed structure for additional earthquake resistance, utilizing new reinforced gunite walls on the exterior of the building. th . Summary - H.J. Degenkolb Associates has extensive and varied experience in the field of earthquake engineering, with particular emphasis on: ° Evaluation of seismic performance of buildings and non-structural systems, including computer facilities and other equipment. 12 is o EXHIBIT "B" ' i. H.J.Degenkolb Associates.Engineers 1. 'i Development of specific mitigation plans and solutions for varying degrees of risk, assisting in evaluation of cost—benefit factors. . E ° Preparation of the design of seismic strengthening systems for 4 buildings, including non—structural items. That experience I , includes full services, with the preparation of construction 4 IR documents, obtaining and analyzing bids and performing professional engineering construction stage services. i " • ####0 s.r i L tl fr.•i, 61 ti. 1. ' t FF i 1' T' .1 ;. • y> 13 EXHIBIT "B" • • .E; ..:J.Degenkolb Associates.Engineers SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE — STEEL FLUID STORAGE TANKS Washwater Tank, Balboa Water Treatment Plant - A.J. Degenkolb Associates was an integral part of the team which evaluated the effects of the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake on the Balboa Water Treatment Plant. The washwater tank, a steel tank 100 feet in diameter and 36 feet high, suffered buckling of portions of -'%' the tank and anchor bolt failure. The damage resulted from the vertical and horizontal forces induced by sloshing of the water caused by the ground motion. • Auxiliary Fuel Oil Storage Tank - Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore - .�l H.J. Degenkolb Associates prepared a report "The Effects of the Livermore Earthquakes of January 1980 on Sandia Laboratories", ;;. which included evaluation of the performance of the auxiliary fuel oil storage tank. The steel tank, 25 feet in diameter and 48 feet high, developed a nearly complete "elephant's foot" buckle at the base and suffered failure of all of the anchor bolts. The firm subsequently prepared design documents and provided i; construction review for repair of the tank. ,S. I; ° Report on Earthquake Resistant Design — LNG Terminals in California — s� H.J. Degenkolb Associates prepared reports for the California cc Coastal Commission, which included specific recommendations for • ' Y, design of the storage tanks. 6. : e Investigation of Seismic Forces on Steel Tanks for Bethlehem Steel Company - ,i ' -•i" This report presented our recommendations for seismic design of cif ' small steel tanks and included a summary of basic references ,Ir` covering design and observed performance of steel tanks. r. i . •• ht Y 4 maw' EXHIBIT "B" N N•J.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers U . ' SUMMARY - SHORING AND DEEP EXCAVATION PROJECTS A H. J. Degenkolb Associates has had considerable experience in the field of construction shoring and the effects of construction on adjacent settlements. Each shoring design or consulting project • involves consideration of numerous factors resulting in a customized design or set of recommendations. Factors always considered are soil types, water levels and effects of dewatering, bracing systems, effects of bulkhead movement on adjacent structures, practical ;,r construction operations, etc. The following is a partial description `: of experience: '.t1 SLURRY WALL CONSTRUCTION v --v5 ,. The firm has had extensive experience in the design of slurry wall LI:- . bulkheads and in the observation of their construction and • ".. performance. Specific projects for which H. J. Degenkolb Associates . had this responsibility include: ° Bank of California San Francisco • h : ° St. Francis Hotel ."4, Tower Addition San Francisco ' + ,h. ATS. 'Z. ° - AAA Office Building San Francisco • $: : ° One Market Plaza San Francisco yr' (See below) ,, SHORING DESIGN - ONE MARKET PLAZA, SAN FRANCISCO ! The design of a slurry wall bulkhead at the foot of Market Street in rdeep bay muds. The design included monitoring systems which permitted evaluation of the bulkhead performance and resulted in a savings of ;time and costs by utilizing the results of the monitoring system. The ., : design received Honorable Mention in the National Awards for ' Engineering Excellence competition of the American Consulting s Engineers Council. • xk 1 •o .. EXHIBIT "B" N.J.Degenkolb Associates,Engineers r OTHER CONSTRUCTION BULKHEADS H. J. Degenkolb Associates has performed the design and construction observatiot of other bulkheads for deep excavations on the following projects: ° Bank of America World Headquarters San Francisco ° TransAmerica Building San Francisco • Bank of America Data Center and Bank of America Data Center ' ' Parking Structure San Francisco ° Office Building, 350 California Street San Francisco ° Office Building, 595 Market Street San Francisco o Office Building, California and Front Streets San Francisco e. o Masonic Temple San Francisco o Saks Fifth Avenue, Union Square San Francisco ° Levi's Plaza, Battery and Union Streets San Francisco C Federal Reserve Bank, Market Street between Main and Spear Streets San Francisco 44 ° Crocker National Bank Building Northern California Headquarters, Kearny Street and Post Street San Francisco o Pacific Gateway Office Building, Mission Street between Main and a Beale Streets San Francisco • Office Building, 201 Spear Street San Francisco O Office Building, 100 Spear Street San Francisco f Office Building, 123 Mission Street San Francisco • Office Building, 345 California Street San Francisco • Office Building, 333 Bush Street San Francisco i Office Building, 222 Kearny Street San Francisco ;A Office Building, 250 Montgomery Street San Francisco "' ° Bank of Canton Building, 555 Montgomery Street San Francisco o Hotel at Post and Mason Streets San Francisco ° Office Building, 33 New Montgomery Street San Francisco ' ° Office Building, 455 Market Street San Francisco • 2 H.J.Degenkelh Associates,Engineers EXHIBIT "B" '":- or ° Office Building, 11th and Broadway for Bechtel Corporation a ° Oakland Embankment Bulkhead, Shell Oil Company Coalinga o . Embankment Bulkhead, Snake Road d o Oakland Embankment Bulkhead, Standard Oil Richmond ° Silicon Valley Financial Center San Jose o Office Building, Stockton & O'Farrell Sts. San Francisco ° Office Building, Embarcadero West o San Francisco Hotel, Embarcadero West San Francisco ° Office Building, 100 First Street San Francisco CONSULTATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT Consultants to evaluate the effects and protection measures of structures adjacent to proposed tunneling operations in downtown Los Angeles. Preparation of contract drawings and specifications for protection of buildings immediatel} above proposed tunnel driving. CONSULTATION - BALTIMORE RAPID TRANSIT Consultants to Bechtel Corporation for the protection of structures adjacent to tunneling operations in soft soils near the Bolton Hill :+ Station. CONSULTATION - MBTA RED LINE EXTENSION, BOSTON ''17 Consultants to Bechtel Corporation for evaluating the effects and the F, protection of structures adjacent to tunneling operations in Boston transit extension. INVESTIGATION OF SLURRY WALL FAILURE, OMAHA, NEBRASKA '.. Investigation of slurry wall failure at the City-County Building in : Omaha, Nebraska, including expert testimony. . CONSULTATION ON BART CONSTRUCTION Mr. Degenkolb was a member of a consulting panel to PBTB, BART design engineers, on subsurface construction problems. The firm also evaluated 1. the effect of tunneling operations on adjacent structures along segments of the BART route. 6 =.j • 3 ' 1 • • EXHIBIT "B" H. J. DEGENKOLB ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS I. CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES General Conditions and Compensation v Ring engineering services include investigations, research, preparation of, reports, etc. The scope of • services is defined in the letter of agreement for each project I Conditions tor who may perform work in connection with The drawings, specifications, 'reports and re- any design, report, or study prepared by H. J. t• •auctions thereof are instruments of service Degenkolb Associates of such limitation of ha- . 10 be used only for the specific project coy- bility for design defects, errors, omissions or 'wed by the agreement between the client and professional negligence, and require as a con- J. Degenkolb Associates. Tracings and/or dition precedent to their performing the work a lal masters, as well as calculations, shall like limitation of liability on their part as against main the property of H. J. Degenkolb Associ- H. J. Degenkolb Associates. In the event that tet, unless set forth in the letter of agree- the client does not wish to limit our firm's pro- nt, and are not to be reused by the client fessional liability to this sum, H. J. Degenkolb other projects Associates will waive this limitation upon the • J Degenkolb Associates warrants that its client's written request provided that the client races are performed within the limits pre- agrees to pay for this waiver an additional con • bed by its clients with the usual thorough- sideration of 5% of our firm's total fee or $200, as and competence of the engineering pro- whichever is greater. 1 =ion No other warranty or representation, In the event the client makes a claim against her expressed or implied, is included or in- H. J. Degenkolb Associates, at law or otherwise, f nded In H. J. Degenkolb Associates propos- for any alleged error, omission or other act aris- ( If;contracts, designs or reports The firm does ing out of the performance of professional serv- •t guarantee the completion of performance ices, and the client fails to prove such claim, contracts by the construction contractor(s) then the client shall pay all costs incurred by other third parties, nor is it responsible for H. J. Degenkolb Associates in defending itself i air acts or omissions, nor for the safety of against the claim. contractor(s) work, • estimates or statements of cost referred to • the scope of services are predicted costs Compensation are based on professional opinions and Employee's time will be charged to the client based ••ment. H. J. Degenkolb Associates cannot on the attached schedule of hourly rates These rates held responsible for fluctuations in construc- are subject to change upon notification. • costs and factors which could not be anti- Time spent in traveling, when in the interest of the • ted at the time of preparation of a particu- astimate. project, will be charged to the client. A maximum charge of eight hours per day will be made for travel. " client agrees to limit any and all liability or Direct non-salary expenses will be charged at cost, ms for damages, costs of defense, or ex- • e to be levied against H. J. Degenkolb plus 10%. Direct non-salary expenses include, but • lates to a sum not to exceed $50,000, or are not limited to: • amount of its fee, whichever is greater, on a Travel and subsistence when away from the • •unt of any design defect, error, omission, home office on project business professional negligence. Further, the client b. Identifiable communication expense such as lees to notify any contractor or subcontrac- telephone and telegraph outside the home of- • EXHIBIT "B" fice metropolitan area, and postage other than for general correspondence. c. Plan check permit and inspection fees required by governing bodies. - d. Photographic services. e. Identifiable printing and reproduction costs ap- plicable to the project. f. Engineering computer services. The basic charge includes pro-rated costs of develop- ment, preparation and verification of programs utilized on the project r g. Subcontracted services. c. Method of Payment Invoices are submitted at the end of each calendar month for services performed during the month or '' 44-:'• as otherwise agreed to by the client. These are pay- . Fir able on receipt . Interest of 1-1/2% per month (but not exceeding the maximum rate allowable by law) will be payable on �• • any amounts not paid within 30 days, payment there- rfri • after to be applied first to accrued interest and then • 2 ' to the principal unpaid amount. Any attorney's fees or other cost incurred in collecting any delinquent .Y•.. amount shall be paid by the client i • Modification of Agreement f , The foregoing conditions may be modified only by �:;.; written agreement `. j p. {. • EXHIBIT "B" .1' ,. 51 • i COMPENSATION SCHEDULE The following hourly rates are applicable as of July 1, 1985. These rates are subject to change upon notification. Henry J. Degenkolb $150/hour Senior Structural Engineers $86-110/hour Design Engineers $54-86/hour Structural Designers $34-54/hour 1r Senior Draftsperson $41-64/hour Draftsperson $26-41/hour +i V. k.; • t ix • ;s.:4